XML 89 R54.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.4
IFRS 7 Disclosures (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2020
Statement [LineItems]  
Summary of Risk Management Strategies
 
  
Market risk management strategy is governed by the Global Asset Liability Committee which oversees the overall market and liquidity risk program. Our overall strategy to manage our market risks incorporates several component strategies, each targeted to manage one or more of the market risks arising from our businesses. At an enterprise level, these strategies are designed to manage our aggregate exposures to market risks against limits associated with earnings and capital volatility.
 
The following table outlines our key market risks and identifies the risk management strategies which contribute to managing these risks.
 
 
 
   
Risk Management Strategy
 
Key Market Risk
 
      Publicly
Traded Equity
Performance Risk
  Interest Rate
and Spread Risk
  Alternative
Long-Duration Asset

Performance Risk
  Foreign
Exchange Risk
  Liquidity Risk 
  
Product design and pricing
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
Variable annuity guarantee dynamic hedging
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
Macro equity risk hedging
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
  
Asset liability management
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
Foreign exchange management
    
 
 
 
 
 
  
Liquidity risk management
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Schedule of Maturity of Financial Liabilities
The following table outlines the maturity of the Company’s significant financial liabilities.
Maturity of financial liabilities
(1)
 
     
As at December 31, 2020
($ millions)
 
Less than
1 year
  
1 to 3
years
  
3 to 5
years
  
Over 5
years
  Total 
 
   
Long-term debt
 
$
 
 
$
 
 
$
 
 
$
6,164
 
 
$
6,164
 
 
   
Capital instruments
 
 
350
 
 
 
 
 
 
584
 
 
 
6,895
 
 
 
7,829
 
 
   
Derivatives
 
 
386
 
 
 
250
 
 
 
555
 
 
 
13,771
 
 
 
14,962
 
 
   
Deposits from
 bank 
clients
(2)
 
 
16,783
 
 
 
2,591
 
 
 
1,515
 
 
 
 
 
 
20,889
 
 
   
Lease liabilities
 
 
116
 
 
 
115
 
 
 
47
 
 
 
75
 
 
 
353
 
 
   
(1)
 The amounts shown above are net of the related unamortized deferred issue costs.
(2)
 Carrying value and fair value of deposits from Bank clients as at December 31, 2020 was $20,889 million and $21,085 million, respectively (2019 – $21,488 million and $21,563 million, respectively). Fair value is determined by discounting contractual cash flows, using market interest rates currently offered for deposits with similar terms and conditions. All deposits from Bank clients were categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy (2019 – Level 2).
 
 
Summary of Variable Annuity and Segregated Fund Guarantees, Net of Reinsurance
The table below shows selected information regarding the Company’s variable annuity and segregated fund investment-related guarantees gross and net of reinsurance.
Variable annuity and segregated fund guarantees, net of reinsurance
 
     
As at December 31,

($ millions)
 
2020
     
2019
 
     
Guarantee
value
  
Fund
value
  
Amount
at
risk
(3),(4)
     
Guarantee
value
  
Fund
value
  
Amount
at
risk
(3),(4)
 
 
   
Guaranteed minimum income benefit
 
$
4,277
 
 
$
3,642
 
 
$
837
 
     $4,629  $3,696  $998 
 
   
Guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit
 
 
49,698
 
 
 
44,831
 
 
 
5,962
 
      53,355   48,031   6,030 
 
   
Guaranteed minimum accumulation benefit
 
 
18,436
 
 
 
18,918
 
 
 
8
 
      17,994   18,362   10 
 
   
Gross living benefits
(1)
 
 
72,411
 
 
 
67,391
 
 
 
6,807
 
      75,978   70,089   7,038 
 
   
Gross death benefits
(2)
 
 
8,968
 
 
 
18,819
 
 
 
689
 
      9,555   17,186   802 
 
   
Total gross of reinsurance
 
 
81,379
 
 
 
86,210
 
 
 
7,496
 
      85,533   87,275   7,840 
 
   
Living benefits reinsured
 
 
3,672
 
 
 
3,157
 
 
 
694
 
      3,977   3,199   832 
 
   
Death benefits reinsured
 
 
677
 
 
 
534
 
 
 
282
 
      718   500   318 
 
   
Total reinsured
 
 
4,349
 
 
 
3,691
 
 
 
976
 
      4,695   3,699   1,150 
 
   
Total, net of reinsurance
 
$
77,030
 
 
$
82,519
 
 
$
6,520
 
     $80,838  $83,576  $6,690 
 
   
(1) 
Where a policy includes both living and death benefits, the guarantee in excess of the living benefit is included in the death benefit category as outlined in footnote 2.
(2)
 Death benefits include standalone guarantees and guarantees in excess of living benefit guarantees where both death and living benefits are provided on a policy.
(3)
 Amount at risk
(in-the-money
amount) is the excess of guarantee values over fund values on all policies where the guarantee value exceeds the fund value and assumes that all claims are immediately payable. For guaranteed minimum death benefit, the amount at risk is defined as the current guaranteed minimum death benefit in excess of the current account balance. In practice, guaranteed death benefits are contingent and only payable upon the eventual death of policyholders if fund values remain below guarantee values. For guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit, the amount at risk
simplistically
assumes that the benefit is paid as a lump sum based on the withdrawal benefit guarantee value and does not recognize that
actual
claims on this business will instead be paid as a lifetime annuity stream. Adjusting for the time value of money, the net amount at risk will be lower than presented. These benefits are also contingent and only payable at scheduled maturity/income start dates in the future, if the policyholders are still living and have not terminated their policies and fund values remain below guarantee values. For all guarantees, the amount at risk is floored at zero at the single contract level.
(4)
 The amount at risk net of reinsurance at December 31, 2020 was $6,520 million (2019 – $6,690 million) of which: US$4,182 million (2019 – US$3,995 million) was on our U.S. business, $964 million (2019 – $1,178 million) was on our Canadian business, US$71 million (2019 – US$104 million) was on our Japan business and US$111 million (2019 – US$145 million) was related to Asia (other than Japan) and our
run-off
reinsurance business.
 
 
 
 
Summary of Investment Categories for Variable Contracts with Guarantees
Investment categories for variable contracts with guarantees
 
 
 
 
 
Variable contracts with guarantees, including variable annuities and variable life, are invested, at the policyholder’s discretion subject to contract limitations, in various fund types within the segregated fund accounts and other investments. The account balances by investment category are set out below.
 
     
As at December 31,
($ millions)
Investment category
 
2020
  
2019
 
 
   
Equity funds
 
$
47,348
 
 $47,489 
 
   
Balanced funds
 
 
42,414
 
  42,448 
 
   
Bond funds
 
 
11,944
 
  11,967 
 
   
Money market funds
 
 
2,113
 
  1,732 
 
   
Other fixed interest rate investments
 
 
1,992
 
  1,975 
 
   
Total
 
$
105,811
 
 $105,611 
Schedule of Potential Immediate Impact on Net Income Attributed to Shareholders Arising from Changes to Public Equity Returns
     
As at December 31, 2020
($ millions)
 -30%  -20%  -10%  +10%  +20%  +30% 
 
   
Underlying sensitivity to net income attributed to shareholders
(4)
                        
 
   
Variable annuity guarantees
 
$
(3,150
 
$
(1,850
 
$
(800
 
$
600
 
 
$
1,040
 
 
$
1,350
 
 
   
General fund equity investments
(5)
 
 
(1,350
 
 
(840
 
 
(410
 
 
380
 
 
 
760
 
 
 
1,130
 
 
   
Total underlying sensitivity before hedging
 
 
(4,500
 
 
(2,690
 
 
(1,210
 
 
980
 
 
 
1,800
 
 
 
2,480
 
 
   
Impact of macro and dynamic hedge assets
(6)
 
 
2,420
 
 
 
1,410
 
 
 
600
 
 
 
(620
 
 
(1,110
 
 
(1,480
 
   
Net potential impact on net income attributed to shareholders after impact of hedging
 
$
(2,080
 
$
(1,280
 
$
(610
 
$
360
 
 
$
690
 
 
$
1,000
 
         
     
As at December 31, 2019
($ millions)
 -30%  -20%  -10%  +10%  +20%  +30% 
 
   
Underlying sensitivity to net income attributed to shareholders
(4)
                        
 
   
Variable annuity guarantees
 $(3,270 $(1,930 $(860 $620  $1,060  $1,360 
 
   
General fund equity investments
(5)
  (1,140  (720  (330  340   680   1,020 
 
   
Total underlying sensitivity before hedging
  (4,410  (2,650  (1,190  960   1,740   2,380 
 
   
Impact of macro and dynamic hedge assets
(6)
  2,690   1,580   670   (580  (1,020  (1,340
 
   
Net potential impact on net income attributed to shareholders after impact of hedging
 $(1,720 $(1,070 $(520 $380  $720  $1,040 
 
   
 
(1) 
See “Caution Related to Sensitivities” above.
(2)
 The tables above show the potential impact on net income attributed to shareholders resulting from an immediate 10%, 20% and 30% change in market values of publicly traded equities followed by a return to the expected level of growth assumed in the valuation of policy liabilities, excluding impacts from asset-based fees earned on assets under management and policyholder account value.
(3)
 Please refer to “Sensitivity of Earnings to Changes in Assumptions” section below for more information on the level of growth assumed and on the net income sensitivity to changes in these long-term assumptions.
(4)
 Defined as earnings sensitivity to a change in public equity markets including settlements on reinsurance contracts, but before the offset of hedge assets or other risk mitigants.
(5)
 This impact for general fund equity investments includes general fund investments supporting our policy liabilities, investment in seed money investments (in segregated and mutual funds made by Corporate and Other segment) and the impact on policy liabilities related to the projected future fee income on variable universal life and other unit linked products. The impact does not include: (i) any potential impact on public equity weightings; (ii) any gains or losses on AFS public equities held in the Corporate and Other segment; or (iii) any gains or losses on public equity investments held in Manulife Bank. The participating policy funds are largely self-supporting and generate no material impact on net income attributed to shareholders as a result of changes in equity markets.
(6)
 Includes the impact of rebalancing equity hedges in the macro and dynamic hedging program. The impact of dynamic hedge rebalancing represents the impact of rebalancing equity hedges for dynamically hedged variable annuity guarantee best estimate liabilities at 5% intervals but does not include any impact in respect of other sources of hedge ineffectiveness (e.g. fund tracking, realized volatility and equity, interest rate correlations different from expected among other factors).
 
 
 
 
 
 
Summary of Potential Impact on Net Income Attributed to Shareholders and MLI's LICAT Total Ratio of an Immediate Parallel Change in Interest Rates Relative to Rates Assumed in the Valuation of Policy Liabilities
Potential impact on net income attributed to shareholders and MLI’s LICAT total ratio of an immediate parallel change in interest rates relative to rates assumed in the valuation of policy liabilities
(1),(2),(3),(4)
 
       
2020
     2019  
 
 
     
As at December 31,
 -50bp  +50bp     -50bp  +50bp     
 
   
Net income attributed to shareholders ($ millions)
                        
 
   
Excluding change in market value of AFS fixed income assets held in the Corporate and Other segment
 
$
nil
 
 
$
(100
     $ (100 $(100    
 
   
From fair value changes in AFS fixed income assets held in the  Corporate and Other segment, if realized
 
 
2,100
 
 
 
(1,900
      1,700   (1,600    
                             
    
MLI’s LICAT total ratio (Percentage points)
                        
    
LICAT total ratio change in percentage points
(5)
 
 
8
 
 
 
(7
 
 
 
 
  4   (4    
 
   
(1)
 See “Caution Related to Sensitivities” above. In addition, estimates exclude changes to the net actuarial gains/losses with respect to the Company’s pension obligations as a result of changes in interest rates, as the impact on the quoted sensitivities is not considered to be material.
(
2
) 
Includes guaranteed insurance and annuity products, including variable annuity contracts as well as adjustable benefit products where benefits are generally adjusted as interest rates and investment returns change, a portion of which have minimum credited rate guarantees. For adjustable benefit products subject to minimum rate guarantees, the sensitivities are based on the assumption that credited rates will be floored at the minimum.
(
3
) 
The amount of gain or loss that can be realized on AFS fixed income assets held in the Corporate and Other segment will depend on the aggregate amount of unrealized gain or loss.
(
4
) 
Sensitivities are based on projected asset and liability cash flows and the impact of realizing fair value changes in AFS fixed income is based on the holdings at the end of the period.
 
 
 
 
 
Alternative Long-Duration Asset Performance Risk [member]  
Statement [LineItems]  
Summary of Potential Impact on Net Income Attributed to Shareholders Arising from Changes to Spreads
     
As at December 31,
($ millions)
 
2020
     2019 
 
    -10%   +10%       -10%   +10% 
 
   
Net income attributed to shareholders
                    
 
   
Real estate, agriculture and timber assets
 
$
(1,600
 
$
1,400
 
     $(1,300 $1,200 
 
   
Private equities and other ALDA
 
 
(2,000
 
 
1,900
 
      (1,800  1,700 
 
   
Total
 
$
(3,600
 
$
3,300
 
     $(3,100 $2,900 
    
MLI’s LICAT total ratio (change in percentage points)
 
 
(5
 
 
4
 
      (5  4 
 
 
   
(1) See “Caution Related to Sensitivities ” above.
(2) This impact is calculated as at a point-in-time impact and does not include: (i) any potential impact on ALDA weightings or (ii) any gains or losses on ALDA held in the Corporate and Other segment.
(3) The participating policy funds are largely self-supporting and generate no material impact on net income attributed to shareholders as a result of changes in ALDA returns. For some classes of ALDA, where there is not an appropriate long-term benchmark available, the return assumptions used in valuation are not permitted by the Standards of Practice and CIA guidance to result in a lower reserve than an assumption based on a historical return benchmark for public equities in the same jurisdiction.
(4) Net income impact does not consider any impact of the market correction on assumed future return assumptions.
(5) Please refer to “Sensitivity of Earnings to Changes in Assumptions” section below for more information on the level of growth assumed and on the net income sensitivity to changes in these long-term assumptions.
(6) The impact of changes to the portfolio asset mix supporting our North American legacy businesses are reflected in the sensitivities when the changes take place.
Corporate and swap spreads [Member]  
Statement [LineItems]  
Summary of Potential Impact on Net Income Attributed to Shareholders Arising from Changes to Spreads
     
Corporate spreads
(4),(5)
 
2020
  
2019
 
     
As at December 31,
 -50bp  +50bp  -50bp  +50bp 
 
   
Net income attributed to shareholders ($ millions)
 
$
(1,000
 
$
900
 
 $(800 $800 
    
MLI’s LICAT total ratio (change in percentage points)
(6)
 
 
(4
 
 
4
 
  (7  5 
 
     
Swap spreads
 
2020
  
2019
 
     
As at December 31,
 -20bp  +20bp  -20bp  +20bp 
 
   
Net income attributed to shareholders ($ millions)
 
$
nil
 
 
$
nil
 
 $100  $(100
    
MLI’s LICAT total ratio (change in percentage points)
(6)
 
 
nil
 
 
 
nil
 
  nil   nil 
 
 
   
(1)
See “Caution Related to Sensitivities” above.
(2)
 The impact on net income attributed to shareholders assumes no gains or losses are realized on our AFS fixed income assets held in the Corporate and Other segment and excludes the impact of changes in segregated fund bond values due to changes in credit spreads. The participating policy funds are largely self-supporting and generate no material impact on net income attributed to shareholders as a result of changes in corporate and swap spreads.
(3)
 Sensitivities are based on projected asset and liability cash flows.
(4)
 Corporate spreads are assumed to grade to the long-term average over five years.
(5)
 As the sensitivity to a 50 basis point decline in corporate spreads includes the impact of a change in deterministic reinvestment scenarios where applicable, the impact of changes to corporate spreads for less than, or more than, the amounts indicated are unlikely to be linear.
    
(6)
 LICAT impacts include realized and unrealized fair value change in AFS fixed income assets. Under LICAT, spread movements are determined from a selection of investment grade bond indices with BBB and better bonds for each jurisdiction. For LICAT, we use the following indices: FTSE TMX Canada All Corporate Bond Index, Barclays USD Liquid Investment Grade Corporate Index, and
Nomura-BPI
(Japan). LICAT impacts presented for corporate spreads do not reflect the impact of the scenario switch discussed below.