XML 92 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Financial Instruments
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2014
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Financial Instruments

8. Financial Instruments

Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value, which are as follows:

Level 1 – Observable inputs, such as quoted market prices for identical assets and liabilities in active public markets.

Level 2 – Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices based on quoted prices in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions, or valuations in which all significant inputs are observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs to the valuation techniques that are significant to the fair value of the asset or liability.

Assets and liabilities are measured at fair value based on one or more of the following three valuation techniques:

Market Approach – Fair value is determined based on prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets and liabilities.

Income Approach – Fair value is determined by converting relevant future amounts to a single present amount, based on market expectations (including present value techniques and option pricing models).

Cost Approach – Fair value represents the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of the relevant asset (often referred to as replacement cost).

The fair value hierarchy of Actua’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis was as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Asset at

 

 

Valuation Technique

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

(Approach)

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

Cash equivalents (money market accounts)

 

$

77,935

 

 

Market

 

$

77,935

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

$

77,935

 

 

 

 

$

77,935

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liability at

 

 

Valuation Technique

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

(Approach)

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

Acquisition Contingent Consideration Obligations

 

$

3,320

 

 

Income

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

3,320

 

 

 

$

3,320

 

 

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

3,320

 

 

 

 

Asset at

 

 

Valuation Technique

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

(Approach)

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

Cash equivalents (money market accounts and commercial paper investments)

 

$

325,652

 

 

Market

 

$

325,652

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

$

325,652

 

 

 

 

$

325,652

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

During the year ended December 31, 2014, three contingent consideration obligations occurred for Actua.  One was in relation to MSDSonline’s acquisition of KMI where a contingent consideration obligation, in the form of an earn-out, was a component of the MSDSonline’s purchase price for KMI.  Two were in relation to Actua’s acquisition of FolioDynamix where Actua inherited two legacy contingent consideration obligations from prior acquisitions of FolioDynamix.  In aggregate, these three obligations were fair valued on respective dates of acquisitions using monte carlo simulation models that produced results that totaled $3.3 million.  Although the range of these contingent consideration obligations could range from $1.5 million to $5.5 million, there has been little change in value through December 31, 2014, with a value still approximating $3.3 million.  Two of these contingent consideration obligations are short term as they will expire in 2015 and one is long term as it will expire in 2016.  

 

During the year ended December 31, 2012, GovDelivery determined that the estimated fair value of its acquisition contingent consideration obligations had changed with respect to a prior acquisition. The contingent consideration liability had an estimated fair value of $0.7 million, which was determined at the acquisition date, and was written down to the current estimated fair value of zero which resulted in a gain of $0.7 million that is included in “Impairment related and other” on Actua’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. In conjunction with this determination, GovDelivery also performed an impairment analysis of intangible assets and goodwill that were recorded related to the acquisition. See Note 3, “Goodwill and Intangibles, net.”

The carrying value of certain of Actua’s other financial instruments, including accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of those instruments. The fair value of Actua’s long-term debt is based on assumptions concerning the amount and timing of estimated future cash flows and assumed risk-adjusted discount rates. See Note 9, “Debt” for further discussion. Actua’s non-financial assets measured on a non-recurring basis using the market approach were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill (annual impairment assessment)

 

$

264,186

 

 

$

90,466

 

Acquired intangible assets (periodic assessment, as necessary)

 

 

102,325

 

 

 

58,755

 

 

 

$

366,511

 

 

$

149,221