XML 76 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
9 Months Ended
Aug. 31, 2012
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
5. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

Fair Value Measurements

FASB guidance for fair value measurements clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, the guidance establishes a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: (Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; (Level 2) inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require us to develop our own assumptions. This hierarchy requires us to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. On a recurring basis, we measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value, including our marketable securities and foreign currency contracts.

Our cash equivalents and investment instruments are classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. The types of instruments valued based on quoted market prices in active markets include most money market securities and are generally classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

The types of instruments valued based on other observable inputs include investment-grade corporate bonds, mortgage-backed and asset-backed products and state, municipal and provincial obligations. Such instruments are generally classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

We execute our foreign currency contracts primarily in the retail market in an over-the-counter environment with a relatively high level of price transparency. The market participants usually are large multi-national and regional banks. Our foreign currency contracts valuation inputs are based on quoted prices and quoted pricing intervals from public data sources and do not involve management judgment. These contracts are typically classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

The fair value hierarchy of our cash equivalents, short-term investments and foreign currency contracts is as follows (in thousands):

Fair Value Measurements at
Reporting Date using

Description

Total Fair
Value
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets

(Level 1)
Significant
other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

As of August 31, 2012:

Assets:

Money market funds

$ 363,251 $ 363,251 $

Term deposits

583 583

Mortgage-backed securities

196 196

Foreign currency forward contracts

$ 763 $ $ 763

Liabilities:

Foreign currency forward contracts

$ 131 $ $ 131

As of November 30, 2011:

Assets:

Money market funds

$ 16,664 $ 16,664 $

Term deposits

560 560

Mortgage-backed securities

225 225

Foreign currency forward contracts

142 142

Liabilities:

Foreign currency forward contracts

$ 142 $ $ 142

Derivative Instruments

We conduct business in the Americas; Europe, the Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”); and Asia Pacific and Japan (“APJ”). As a result, our financial results could be affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or changes in economic conditions in foreign markets. The U.S. dollar is our major transaction currency; we also transact business in approximately 25 foreign currencies worldwide, of which the most significant to our operations is the Euro. We enter into forward contracts with financial institutions to manage our currency exposure related to net assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, and these forward contracts are generally settled monthly. Our forward contracts reduce, but do not eliminate, the impact of currency exchange rate movements. We do not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. Gains and losses on forward contracts are included in Other Income (Expense) in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

We had the following forward contracts outstanding as of August 31, 2012 (in thousands):

Notional
Value
Local Currency
Notional
Value
USD
Fair Value
Gain (Loss)
USD

Forward contracts denominated in United States dollars sold:

Brazilian real

(1,500 ) $ (740 ) $ (15 )

Taiwanese dollar

(31,000 ) (1,037 ) (8 )

Forward contracts denominated in United States dollars bought:

British pound

12,400 19,692 399

$ 376

Notional
Value
Local Currency
Notional
Value
EURO
Fair Value
Gain (Loss)
USD

Forward contracts denominated in Euros sold:

Australian dollar

(7,000 ) (5,743 ) $ 275

Japanese yen

(120,000 ) (1,217 ) 44

Korean won

(800,000 ) (562 ) 17

United States dollar

(1,000 ) (795 ) 29

Forward contracts denominated in Euros bought:

British pound

7,500 9,452 (100 )

Canadian dollar

1,000 806 (9 )

$ 256

Derivatives not Designated
as Hedging Instruments
August 31,
2012
November 30,
2011

Foreign currency forward contracts, fair value included in:

Other Current Assets

$ 763 $ 142

Accrued Liabilities

131 142

Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized
In Income on Derivative
Three Months Ended
August 31,
Nine Months Ended
August 31,

Derivatives not Designated

as Hedging Instruments

Location

2012 2011 2012 2011

Foreign Currency Contracts

Other income/(exp.) $ 628 $ (109 ) $ (1,167 ) $ (7,678 )