SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)	12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2025
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Basis of Presentation	The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).
Principles of Consolidation	All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with current period presentation.
Use of Estimates in the Financial Statements	Use of Estimates in the Financial Statements The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates are used for (but are not limited to) such items as the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations, fair value of contingent consideration issued in a business combination, the establishment of useful lives for property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, the fair value of equity securities or warrants to purchase the Company’s Common Stock issued individually or as a component of a debt or equity offering, the fair value of changes to the conversion terms of embedded conversion features, the fair value and requisite service periods of stock-based compensation, the fair value of assets received in nonmonetary transactions, the establishment of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities that arise from leasing arrangements, the timing of commencement of capitalization for plant and equipment, impairment of indefinite-lived intangible assets, impairment of long-lived assets, recoverability of deferred tax assets, amortization of deferred issuance costs and debt discount, the fair value of leased assets for the purpose of lease classification, and the recording of various accruals. These estimates are made after considering past and current events and assumptions about future events. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition	Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes revenue under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). The core principle of the revenue standard is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The following five steps are applied to achieve that core principle: •Step 1: Identify the contract with the customer •Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract •Step 3: Determine the transaction price •Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract •Step 5: Recognize revenue when the Company satisfies a performance obligation In order to identify the performance obligations in a contract with a customer, a company must assess the promised goods or services in the contract and identify each promised good or service that is distinct. A performance obligation meets ASC 606’s definition of a “distinct” good or service (or bundle of goods or services) if both of the following criteria are met: the customer can benefit from the good or service either on its own or together with other resources that are readily available to the customer (i.e., the good or service is capable of being distinct), and the entity’s promise to transfer the good or service to the customer is separately identifiable from other promises in the contract (i.e., the promise to transfer the good or service is distinct within the context of the contract). If a good or service is not distinct, the good or service is combined with other promised goods or services until a bundle of goods or services is identified that is distinct. The transaction price is the amount of consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods or services to a customer. The consideration promised in a contract with a customer may include fixed amounts, variable amounts, or both. When determining the transaction price, an entity must consider the effects of all of the following: •Variable consideration •Constraining estimates of variable consideration •The existence of a significant financing component in the contract •Noncash consideration •Consideration payable to a customer Variable consideration is included in the transaction price only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved. The transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation on a relative standalone selling price basis. The transaction price allocated to each performance obligation is recognized when that performance obligation is satisfied, at a point in time or over time as appropriate. Mining Pool The Company has entered into an arrangement with a cryptocurrency mining pool (the Foundry USA Pool) to perform hash computations (i.e. hashrate) for the mining pool in exchange for consideration. Providing hash computation services to a mining pool is an output of the Company’s ordinary activities. The provision of such hash computation services is the sole performance obligation. The mining pool arrangement is terminable at any time without substantial penalty by Foundry USA Pool and may be terminated without substantial penalty by the Company upon providing one Contract Day’s, as defined, prior written notice. The Company’s enforceable right to compensation only begins when and continues while the Company provides hash computation services to its customer, the mining pool operator. Accordingly, the contract term with Foundry USA Pool is deemed to be less than 24 hours and to continuously renew throughout the day. Additionally, the Company concluded that the mining pool operator’s (i.e., the customer’s) renewal right is not a material right because the renewal rights do not include any discounts; that is, the terms, conditions, and compensation amounts are at the then-current market rates. There is no significant financing component in these transactions. The mining pool applies the Full Pay Per Share (“FPPS”) payout model. Under the FPPS model, in exchange for providing hash computation services to the pool, the Company is entitled to pay-per-share base amount and transaction fee reward compensation, calculated on a daily basis, at an amount that approximates the total bitcoin that could have been mined and transaction fees that could have been awarded using the Company’s hash computation services, based upon the then current blockchain difficulty. Under this model, the Company is entitled to compensation, payable in bitcoin, regardless of whether the pool operator successfully records a block to the bitcoin blockchain. The transaction consideration the Company receives, if any, is noncash consideration and is all variable. Because digital assets are considered noncash consideration, fair value of the digital asset award received would generally be determined using the quoted price of the related digital asset in the Company’s principal market at the time of contract inception. The Company has adopted an accounting policy to aggregate individual contracts with individual terms less than 24 hours within each intraday period and apply a consistent valuation point, the start of day Coordinated Universal Time (00:00:00 UTC), to value the related noncash consideration. Revenue is recognized when it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur, which is the same day that control of the contracted service transfers to the mining pool and is the same day as the contract inception. After every 24-hour contract term, the mining pool transfers the digital asset consideration to the Company’s designated digital currency wallets. Consideration payable to the customer in the form of a pool operator fee, which is incurred only to the extent that the Company has generated FPPS consideration, is deducted from the bitcoin the Company receives and is recorded as contra-revenue, as it does not represent a payment for a distinct good or service. The Company recorded revenue from mining of $151.6 million, $139.3 million, and $61.7 million during the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively. Bitcoin Miner Hosting The Company had one bitcoin miner hosting contract which expired in February 2024. At the time of contract inception, the quoted price of bitcoin in the Company’s principal market was approximately $38,000. The Company recorded bitcoin miner hosting revenue of $0.8 million and $7.5 million during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
HPC Leasing	HPC Leasing In December 2024 and August 2025, the Company entered into long-term datacenter lease agreements (the “Core42 HPC Leases” and the “Fluidstack HPC Leases”, respectively, and collectively, the “HPC Leases”) with customers for specified datacenter infrastructure at the Lake Mariner Data Campus to support the customers’ HPC operations. In accordance with ASC 842, Leases, the Company determined at contract inception that these agreements contained a lease, comprising lease components related to the right to use datacenter space and nonlease components for power delivery, physical security, and maintenance services. Certain of the Core42 HPC Leases commenced in 2025 and the remainder of the HPC Leases are expected to commence in 2026. The Company has elected the practical expedient available under ASC 842 to combine the nonlease revenue components that have the same pattern of transfer as the related operating lease components into a single combined component. The single combined component is accounted for under ASC 842 as an operating lease if the lease components are the predominant components and is accounted for under ASC 606 if the nonlease components are the predominant components. The lease components are the predominant components in the Company’s HPC Leases and the single combined component in these arrangements are accounted for under the operating lease guidance of ASC 842. Recognition of HPC lease revenue begins when the Company determines the asset has been made available for the customer’s use. The Company has concluded that it is probable that substantially all of the payments will be collected over the term of the arrangements and recognizes the total combined fixed payments under the agreements on a straight-line basis over the noncancellable term. The Company recognizes the difference between straight-line revenue recognized during the period and the lease payments due pursuant to the underlying arrangement as deferred rent liability or accrued rent receivable in the consolidated balance sheets. Certain arrangements include options to extend the term. These extension options are not reasonably certain to be exercised and are excluded from the lease term and calculation of lease payments at lease commencement. Payments for physical security and other routine maintenance services are included in the fixed lease payments. The lease agreements provide for variable payments for power delivery. Power delivery services represent a stand-ready obligation to make power available to the customer over the coterminous lease term and have the same pattern of transfer as the related operating lease components. Customers are charged monthly for actual power costs incurred at current utility rates. These payments from customers for power delivery are recognized as variable lease payments in accordance with the practical expedient elected. Variable lease payments are presented on a gross basis and are included in HPC lease revenue in the consolidated statements of operations. The lease agreements also provide for variable payments for certain fit-out services as requested by the customer and the Company recognizes revenues as performance obligations are satisfied. In the course of providing its services, the Company routinely subcontracts for services and incurs other direct costs on behalf of its customers. These costs are passed through to the customers, generally with a mark-up, and, in accordance with GAAP, are included in the Company’s HPC lease revenue.
Cost of Revenue	Cost of Revenue Cost of revenue for mining pool revenue is comprised primarily of direct costs of electricity, but excludes depreciation which is separately presented. Cost of revenue for bitcoin miner hosting is comprised primarily of direct costs of electricity, labor and internet provision. Cost of revenue for HPC lease revenue is comprised primarily of direct costs of electricity and also includes costs incurred by the Company in connection with its fit-out services under the HPC Leases.
Power Curtailment Credits	Power Curtailment Credits Proceeds from participation in demand response programs are recorded as a reduction in cost of revenue in the consolidated statements of operations for the period in which the corresponding demand response program occurs.
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash	Cash and Cash Equivalents Highly liquid instruments with an original maturity of three months or less are classified as cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $3,266.4 million and $274.1 million, respectively. The Company maintains cash and cash equivalent balances primarily at three financial institutions that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The Company’s accounts at these institutions are insured, up to $250,000, by the FDIC. As of December 31, 2025, the Company bank balances exceeded the FDIC insurance limit by $3,649.0 million. To reduce its risk associated with the failure of such financial institutions, the Company evaluates at least annually the rating of the financial institutions in which it holds deposits. Restricted Cash The Company considers cash and marketable securities to be restricted when withdrawal or general use is legally restricted. The Company reports restricted cash in the consolidated balance sheets and determines current or noncurrent classification based on the expected duration of the restriction.
Nonmonetary Transactions	Nonmonetary Transactions The Company accounts for goods and services exchanged in nonmonetary transactions at fair value unless the underlying exchange transaction lacks commercial substance or the fair value of the assets received or relinquished is not reasonably determinable, in which case the nonmonetary exchange would be measured based on the recorded amount of the nonmonetary asset relinquished.
Digital Assets	Digital Assets Digital assets consists of bitcoin earned as noncash consideration for providing hash computation services to a mining pool and for bitcoin miner hosting services, in accordance with the Company’s revenue recognition policy. From time to time, the Company also received bitcoin as distributions-in-kind from its Nautilus Joint Venture. Digital assets is classified as a current asset in the consolidated balance sheets as it is highly liquid and the Company expects to sell it within the next twelve months to support operations. In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2023-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Crypto Assets (Subtopic 350-60): Accounting for and Disclosure of Crypto Assets (“ASU 2023-08”). The new standard requires certain crypto assets to be subsequently measured at fair value, with changes recognized in net income each reporting period. The Company elected to early adopt ASU 2023-08 effective January 1, 2024, resulting in a cumulative-effect change of $37,000, increasing the digital asset balance and decreasing the opening balance of accumulated deficit in the consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2024. Following adoption of ASU 2023-08, the Company measures digital assets at fair value each reporting period in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement (“ASC 820”). Fair value is determined using Level 1 inputs based on quoted prices from the active trading platform on which the Company regularly transacts, which is considered its principal market for bitcoin. Because bitcoin is continuously traded, the Company uses the midnight UTC price to align with its revenue recognition policy. Gains and losses from remeasurement are included within “loss (gain) on fair value of digital assets, net” in the consolidated statements of operations. For bitcoin sales, gains and losses are calculated as the difference between cash proceeds and the cost basis, using a first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. These gains and losses are also included within “loss (gain) on fair value of digital assets, net” in the consolidated statements of operations. During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company recorded loss (gain) on fair value of digital assets, net of $0.6 million and $(2.2) million, respectively. Accounting for Digital Assets Prior to ASU 2023-08 Before adopting ASU 2023-08, the Company accounted for bitcoin as an indefinite-lived intangible asset. Under this model, digital assets were not amortized, but assessed for impairment annually, or more frequently if events indicated a potential impairment. An impairment loss was recognized if the carrying amount exceeded fair value, determined using Level 1 inputs under ASC 820. For impairment testing, the Company bypassed the optional qualitative assessment and monitored daily bitcoin price movements. The lowest intraday trading price was used to determine impairment at the single bitcoin level, with any excess of the carrying amount over the lowest daily trading price recorded as an impairment loss. Once impaired, the new cost basis was established, and subsequent reversals were prohibited. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company recognized digital assets impairment losses of $3.0 million. Statement of Cash Flows Treatment Bitcoin earned through mining activities is recorded as an adjustment in the consolidated statements of cash flows, reconciling net loss to cash flows from operating activities. Bitcoin received as distributions-in-kind from equity investees is disclosed in supplemental noncash investing activities. Following the repayment of the Term Loans in July 2024 (see Note 10), the Company no longer converts bitcoin into cash immediately. Prior to the repayments of the Term Loans in July 2024, proceeds from sales of digital assets were included in cash flows from operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows as bitcoin was converted nearly immediately into cash during that period. Subsequently, proceeds from sales of digital assets are included within cash flows from investing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows as bitcoin has not been converted nearly immediately into cash.
Concentrations	Concentrations During 2025, the Company contracted with one supplier for the provision of bitcoin miners and, historically, primarily contracted with two suppliers for the provision of bitcoin miners. In addition, the Company primarily contracted with one mining pool operator during the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023. During the year end December 31, 2025, the Company’s HPC lease revenue was generated from one customer. The Company does not believe that these counterparties represent a significant performance risk. Revenue from one bitcoin miner hosting customer represented 10.9% of consolidated revenue for the year ended December 31, 2023. During the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, the Company operations were predominately bitcoin mining. If the market value of bitcoin declines significantly, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company may be adversely affected.
Business Combinations	Business Combinations The Company includes the results of operations of the businesses it acquires as of the acquisition date. The Company allocates the purchase price of the acquisitions to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. The excess of the purchase price over the fair values of identifiable assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill. Contingent consideration is included within the purchase price and is recognized at its fair value on the acquisition date. A liability resulting from contingent consideration is remeasured to fair value as of each reporting date until the contingency is resolved, and subsequent changes in fair value are recognized in earnings. While the Company uses its best estimates and assumptions to accurately apply preliminary values to assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date as well as contingent consideration, where applicable, these estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, the Company records adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the values of the assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations. Accounting for business combinations requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially at the acquisition date, including estimates for assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and contingent consideration, where applicable. Although the Company believes the assumptions and estimates it has made have been reasonable and appropriate, they are based in part on historical experience and information obtained from management of the acquired companies and are inherently uncertain. Critical estimates include valuation of the contingent consideration transferred, and assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that may affect the accuracy or validity of such assumptions, estimates, or actual results. Acquisition-related expenses are recognized separately from the business combination and are expensed as incurred.
Goodwill	Goodwill The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently when an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. The Company may elect to utilize a qualitative assessment to evaluate whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value and if so, it performs a quantitative test. If a quantitative test is required, the Company estimates the fair value of the reporting unit using discounted cash flows. The Company’s analyses require significant assumptions and judgments, including assumptions about future economic conditions, revenue growth, and operating margins, among other factors. Events or changes in circumstances considered in the qualitative analysis, many of which are subjective in nature, include: a significant negative trend in the Company’s industry or overall economic trends, a significant change in how the Company uses the acquired assets, a significant change in business strategy, a significant decrease in the market value of the asset, and a significant change in regulations or in the industry that could affect the value of the asset. The Company compares the carrying value of each reporting unit to its estimated fair value and if the fair value is determined to be less than the carrying value, the Company would recognize an impairment loss for the difference.
Equity Method of Accounting	Equity Method of Accounting Investee companies that are not consolidated, but over which the Company exercises significant influence, are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Whether or not the Company exercises significant influence with respect to an investee depends on an evaluation of several factors including, among others, representation on the investee company’s board of directors and ownership level, which is generally a 20% to 50% interest in the voting securities of the investee company. Under the equity method of accounting, an investee company’s accounts are not reflected within the Company’s consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations; however, the Company’s share of the earnings or losses of the investee company is reflected in equity in net (loss) income of investee, net of tax in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company’s carrying value in an equity method investee company is reflected in equity in net assets of investee in the consolidated balance sheets. Interest related to construction of assets at equity method investee companies is capitalized when the financial statement effect of capitalization is material, construction of the asset at the equity method investee has begun, the equity method investee has not commenced its principal operations and interest is being incurred. Interest capitalization ends at the earlier of the asset being substantially complete and ready for its intended use, the equity method investee commences principal operations or when interest costs are no longer being incurred. Equity method investments are regularly reviewed to determine whether a significant event or change in circumstances has occurred that may impact the fair value of each investment. If the fair value of the investment has dropped below the carrying amount, management considers several factors when determining whether an other-than-temporary decline in market value has occurred, including the length of time and extent to which the market value has been below cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value and other factors influencing the fair market value, such as general market conditions. When the Company’s carrying value in an equity method investee company is reduced to zero, no further losses are recorded in the Company’s consolidated financial statements unless the Company has guaranteed obligations of the investee company or has committed additional funding. When the investee company subsequently reports income, the Company will not record its share of such income until it equals the amount of its share of losses not previously recognized.
Variable Interest Entities	Variable Interest Entities Variable interest entities (“VIE”) are legal entities in which equity investors do not have (i) sufficient equity at risk for the legal entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, or (ii) as a group, the power, through voting or similar rights, to direct the activities of the legal entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance, or (iii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the legal entity or the right to receive expected residual returns of the legal entity. The Company would consolidate any VIE in which it has a controlling financial interest through being deemed to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE. The primary beneficiary of a VIE has both of the following characteristics: (1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact its economic performance; and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could be significant to the VIE. If both characteristics are met, the Company considers itself to be the primary beneficiary and therefore will consolidate that VIE into its consolidated financial statements. The Company determines whether it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE upon initial involvement with a VIE and reassesses whether it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE on an ongoing basis. The determination of whether an entity is a VIE and whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE is based upon facts and circumstances for the VIE and requires significant judgments such as whether the entity is a VIE, whether the Company’s interest in a VIE is a variable interest, the determination of the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the entity, whether the Company controls those activities, and whether the Company has the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could be significant to the VIE. Abernathy Joint Venture In 2025, the Company entered into the Abernathy Joint Venture. The Company determined the Abernathy Joint Venture is a VIE, and while the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence over the Abernathy Joint Venture, the Company determined that it did not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact its economic performance. As such, the Company determined that it was not the primary beneficiary of the Abernathy Joint Venture and, therefore, will account for this entity under the equity method of accounting. There is no basis difference between the carrying amount of our investment and our share of the underlying net assets. See Note 12 for additional information. Nautilus Joint Venture In 2021, the Company entered into a joint venture, Nautilus Cryptomine LLC (“Nautilus”), with an unrelated co-venturer to develop, construct and operate up to 300 MW of zero-carbon bitcoin mining in Pennsylvania. Due to the initial nature of the Nautilus Joint Venture and the continued commitment for additional financing, the Company determined Nautilus was a VIE. While the Company had the ability to exercise significant influence over Nautilus, the Company determined that it did not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of Nautilus. Initially, the power to direct the activities of Nautilus that most significantly impact Nautilus’ economic performance were shared equally by both parties within the Nautilus Joint Venture due to the requirement for both equity holders to approve many of the key operating decisions and when not equally shared, were predominantly under the control of the co-venturer, including through the co-venturer’s majority representation on the board of managers. As such, the Company determined that it was not the primary beneficiary of Nautilus and, therefore, had accounted for this entity under the equity method of accounting. Risks associated with the Company’s involvement with Nautilus included a commitment to potentially fund additional equity investments.
Property, Plant and Equipment	Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets (generally 5 years for computer equipment and 4 years for miners). Leasehold improvements and electrical equipment are depreciated over the shorter of their estimated useful lives (25 years) or the lease term. Changes in depreciation and amortization, generally accelerated depreciation and variable amortization, are determined and recorded when estimates of the remaining useful lives or residual values of long-term assets change. Property, plant and equipment included deposits on miners amounting to approximately $0 and $53.9 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, which would be included in property, plant and equipment upon receipt. Interest related to construction of assets is capitalized when the financial statement effect of capitalization is material, construction of the asset has begun, and interest is being incurred. Interest capitalization ends at the earlier of the asset being substantially complete and ready for its intended use or when interest costs are no longer being incurred.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets	Impairment of Long-lived Assets The Company reviews its long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset, or asset group, may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. Any impairment loss recorded is measured as the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.
Leases	Leases In accordance with ASC 842, at inception of a contract, the Company determines whether the contract is or contains a lease. If the Company is the lessee, the lease is classified as an operating or finance lease at the commencement date. Operating leases are included in operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) asset, current portion of operating lease liability, and operating lease liability, net of current portion in the consolidated balance sheets. Finance leases are included in finance lease right-of-use asset, current portion of finance lease liabilities, and finance lease liabilities, net of current portion in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company does not recognize a ROU asset or lease liability for short-term leases having initial terms of 12 months or less and instead recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had one short-term lease. The Company did not have any short-term leases as of December 31, 2024. In an arrangement that is determined to be or contain a lease, the Company includes both the lease and nonlease components as a single component and accounts for it as a lease when the Company would otherwise recognize the cost associated with both the lease and nonlease components in a similar fashion. ROU assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent the Company’s obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. ROU assets and lease liabilities are recognized at commencement date, and subsequently remeasured upon changes to the underlying lease arrangement, based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. If the rate implicit in the lease is not readily determinable, the Company generally uses an estimate of its incremental borrowing rate based on the estimated rate of interest for collateralized borrowing over a similar term of the lease payments at the commencement date. The ROU asset also includes any lease prepayments made and excludes lease incentives. The Company’s lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise that option. Costs associated with operating lease ROU assets are recognized on a straight-line basis within operating expenses or selling, general and administrative, as appropriate, over the term of the lease. Variable lease costs are recognized as incurred and primarily consist of common area maintenance charges not included in the measurement of right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities. Finance lease ROU assets are amortized within operating expenses or selling, general and administrative expenses, as appropriate, on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or, in the instance where title does not transfer at the end of the lease term, the lease term. The interest component of a finance lease is included in interest expense and recognized using the effective interest method over the lease term.
Debt Issuance Costs and Debt Discount	Debt Issuance Costs and Debt Discount Debt issuance costs and debt discount are recorded as a direct reduction of the carrying amount of the debt and are amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the contractual term of the debt and in consideration of expected future principal payments including, when applicable, payments subject to an excess cash flow sweep (see Note 10). Debt issuance costs include incremental third-party costs directly related to debt issuance such as attorney and financial advisor fees. Debt discount includes upfront fees and proceeds allocated to other components included in the debt issuance. The allocation of proceeds between the debt instrument and any other components included in the debt issuance, including Common Stock or warrants to purchase Common Stock, is generally based on the relative fair value allocation method.
Debt Modification	Debt Modification The Company evaluates amendments to its debt instruments in accordance with ASC 470-50, Debt Modifications and Extinguishments. This evaluation includes comparing (1) if applicable, the change in fair value of an embedded conversion option to that of the carrying amount of the debt immediately prior to amendment and (2) the net present value of future cash flows of the amended debt to that of the original debt to determine, in each case, if a change greater than 10% occurred. In instances where the net present value of future cash flows or the fair value of an embedded conversion option, if any, changed more than 10%, the Company applies extinguishment accounting. In instances where the net present value of future cash flows and the fair value of an embedded conversion option, if any, changed less than 10%, the Company accounts for the amendment to the debt as a debt modification. For debt that has been amended more than once in a twelve-month period, the debt terms that existed just prior to the earliest amendment occurring in the prior twelve months are applied to the 10% test, provided modification accounting was previously applied. Gains and losses on debt amendments that are considered extinguishments are recognized in current earnings. Debt amendments that are considered debt modifications are accounted for prospectively through yield adjustments, based on the revised terms. Legal fees and other costs incurred with third parties that are directly related to debt modifications are expensed as incurred and generally are included in interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations. Amounts paid by the Company to the lenders, including upfront fees and the fair value of warrants issued, are included in future cash flows for accounting treatment determination and, if debt modification is applicable, are also included in the determination of yield adjustment.
Convertible Instruments	Convertible Instruments The Company accounts for its issuance of convertible debt and convertible equity instruments in accordance with applicable U.S. GAAP. In connection with that accounting, the Company assesses the various terms and features of the agreement in accordance with ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (“ASC 480”), and ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging Activities (“ASC 815”). ASC 480 requires liability accounting for certain financial instruments, including shares that embody an unconditional obligation to transfer a variable number of shares, provided that the monetary value of the obligation is based solely or predominantly on one of the following three characteristics: (1) a fixed monetary amount known at inception, (2) variations in something other than the fair value of the issuer’s equity shares or (3) variations in the fair value of the issuer’s equity shares, but the monetary value to the counterparty moves in the opposite direction as the value of the issuer’s shares. In accordance with ASC 815, the Company assesses the various terms and features of the agreement to determine whether or not they contain embedded derivative instruments that are required under ASC 815 to be accounted for separately from the host contract and recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. The fair value of derivative liabilities, if any, is required to be revalued at each reporting date, with corresponding changes in fair value recorded in the current period’s operating results.
Derivatives	Derivatives The Company does not apply hedge accounting to its derivatives. Rather, changes in the fair values of derivatives for a particular period are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company evaluates its contracts to determine if they meet the definition of a derivative instrument. If a contract meets the definition, the Company evaluates whether it qualifies for the normal purchases and normal sales exemption and may elect the exemption if the criteria is met.
Warrants	Warrants The Company applies ASC 480 and ASC 815 to assist in the determination of whether warrants issued for the purchase of Common Stock should be classified as liabilities or equity. Warrants that are determined to require liability classification are measured at fair value upon issuance and are subsequently remeasured to their then fair value at each subsequent reporting period with changes in fair value recorded in current earnings. Warrants that are determined to require equity classification are measured at fair value upon issuance and are not subsequently remeasured unless they are required to be reclassified. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had recorded warrant liabilities of $844.7 million relating to the warrants issued in connection with the Google Backstop (see Note 8). All other outstanding warrants granted by the Company have been classified as equity.
Stock Issuance Costs	Stock Issuance Costs Stock issuance costs are recorded as a reduction to issuance proceeds. Stock issuance costs incurred prior to the closing of the related issuances, including under shelf registration statements, are recorded in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets if the closing of the related issuance is deemed probable.
Stock-based Compensation	Stock-based Compensation The Company periodically issues restricted stock units (“RSU”) and restricted stock to employees and non-employees in non-capital raising transactions for services. In accordance with ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”), the Company measures stock-based compensation cost at the grant date, based on the estimated fair value of the award. For RSUs with time-based vesting, the fair value is determined by the Company’s stock price on the date of grant. For RSUs with vesting based on market conditions (“PSUs”), the effect of the market condition is considered in the determination of fair value on the grant date using a Monte Carlo simulation model. As of December 31, 2025, the Company has not issued stock options. Expense for RSUs is recognized on a straight-line basis over the employee’s or non-employee’s requisite service period, including the derived service period for RSUs with market conditions. Expense for restricted stock is recognized on the date of grant as the awards are fully vested on the grant date. Stock-based compensation for PSUs is recorded over the derived service period unless the market condition is satisfied in advance of the derived service period, in which case a cumulative catch-up is recognized as of the date of achievement. Stock-based compensation for PSUs is recorded regardless of whether the market conditions are met unless the service conditions are not met. The Company accounts for forfeitures as they occur. The Company recognizes excess tax benefits or deficiencies on vesting or settlement of awards as discrete items within income tax benefit or provision within net loss and the related cash flows are classified within operating activities.
Other Income	Other Income Other income consists primarily of interest income on bank deposits.
Income Taxes	Income Taxes The Company accounts for income taxes pursuant to the provision of ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes (“ASC 740”), which requires, among other things, an asset and liability approach to calculating deferred income taxes. The asset and liability approach requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is provided to offset any net deferred tax assets for which management believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company follows the provision of ASC 740 related to accounting for uncertain income tax positions. When tax returns are filed, it is more likely than not that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. In accordance with the guidance of ASC 740, the benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. The tax benefits recognized in the consolidated financial statements from such positions are then measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with the tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above are reflected as a liability for uncertain tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheets along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination. The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties that would be assessed in relation to the settlement value of unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense.
Loss per Share	Loss per Share The Company computes earnings (loss) per share using the two-class method required for participating securities. The two-class method requires income available to common stockholders for the period to be allocated between Common Stock and participating securities based upon their respective rights to receive dividends as if all income for the period had been distributed. Basic loss per share of Common Stock is calculated by dividing the Company’s net loss by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period. Convertible preferred stock is considered a participating security because it shares on a pro rata basis in any dividends declared on Common Stock. However, since it does not participate in the Company’s losses, it is excluded from the computation of basic net loss per share. Diluted loss per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if other instruments were converted into Common Stock, using the treasury stock method or if-converted method, as applicable. However, for periods in which the Company reports a net loss, all potentially dilutive instruments are excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share, as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. Subsequent to December 31, 2023, the Company determined that its preferred stock dividends would be excluded as a reduction to net loss on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations, and accordingly be excluded from the Company’s computation of basic loss per common share. Previously, the Company had included dividends in this calculation. The Company’s dilutive instruments or participating securities as of December 31, 2025 included Common Stock warrants, convertible notes, and RSUs issued for services. The Company’s dilutive instruments or participating securities as of December 31, 2024 included convertible preferred stock, Common Stock warrants, convertible notes, and RSUs issued for services.
Segment Reporting	Segment Reporting The Company has two operating segments: “Digital Asset Mining,” consisting of providing hash computation services to a mining pool operator and “HPC Leasing,” consisting of providing high-density colocation services to third parties for HPC operations and all operations are domiciled in the United States of America. The reportable segments are identified based on the types of services performed. The Company’s HPC Leasing operations met the criteria to be considered a new segment during the third quarter of 2025. The Digital Asset Mining segment generates revenue from operating owned digital infrastructure and computer equipment as part of a pool of users that process transactions conducted on one or more blockchain networks. In exchange for these services, the Company receives digital assets. The HPC Leasing segment generates revenue through lease agreements providing the right to use datacenter space and providing power delivery, physical security, and maintenance services. The Company’s operations are evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision–making group (“CODM”), which is composed of the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technology Officer and Chief Strategy Officer, to assess performance and allocate resources. The CODM uses segment profit (loss) to evaluate performance and allocate resources. Segment profit (loss) is used to evaluate actual results against expectations, which are based on comparable prior results, and current budget. Segment profit (loss) is also used in deciding how profits and cash flows will be reinvested or otherwise deployed. No asset information for reportable segments is provided to the CODM as the CODM does not evaluate performance or allocate resources based on segment asset or liability information; accordingly, the Company has not presented a measure of assets by segment. The segments’ accounting policies are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The Company excludes certain operating expenses and other expenses from the allocations to operating segments. Prior to the third quarter of 2025, the Company had one segment, Digital Asset Mining, such that the CODM was regularly provided only with consolidated expense data, as presented in the consolidated statements of operations. The CODM managed this segment using consolidated net loss as the primary measure of performance. In the third quarter of 2025, the Company changed the composition of its reportable segments and, accordingly, has recast its segment information for the year ended December 31, 2024 (see Note 19).
Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations Classification	Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations Classification The Company classifies a business as held for sale in the period in which management commits to a plan to sell the business, the business is available for immediate sale in its present condition, an active program to complete the plan to sell the business is initiated, the sale of the business within one year is probable and the business is being marketed at a reasonable price in relation to its fair value. Newly acquired businesses that meet the held-for-sale classification criteria upon acquisition are reported as discontinued operations. Upon a business’ classification as held for sale, net assets are measured for impairment. An impairment loss is recorded for long-lived assets held for sale when the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value less cost to sell. Other assets and liabilities are generally measured for impairment by comparing their carrying values to their respective fair values. A long-lived asset is not depreciated or amortized while it is classified as held for sale.
Recent Accounting Standards	Recent Accounting Standards Adopted In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (“ASU 2023-09”). ASU 2023-09 expands existing income tax disclosures for rate reconciliations by requiring disclosure of certain specific categories and additional reconciling items that meet the quantitative threshold and expands disclosures for income taxes paid by requiring disaggregation by certain jurisdictions, amount of income taxes separated by federal and individual jurisdiction, and the amount of income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax expense (benefit) disaggregated between federal, state, and foreign. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this new standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. In August 2023, the FASB issued an ASU 2023-05, Business Combinations - Joint Venture Formations (Subtopic 805-60): Recognition and Initial Measurement, that requires a joint venture, upon formation, to measure its assets and liabilities at fair value in its standalone financial statements. A joint venture must recognize the difference between the fair value of its equity and the fair value of its identifiable assets and liabilities as goodwill (or an equity adjustment, if negative) using the business combination accounting guidance regardless of whether the net assets meet the definition of a business. The adoption of this new standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. Issued — Not Yet Adopted In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-11, Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Narrow-Scope Improvements (ASU 2025-11), which clarifies interim disclosure requirements and the applicability of Topic 270. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. Upon adoption, the guidance can be applied prospectively or retrospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard will have on the Company’s disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-07, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) and Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Scope Clarification and Accounting for Certain Contracts and Customer Share-Based Consideration (“ASU 2025-07”), which narrows the types of contracts subject to derivative accounting by excluding those whose payouts depend solely on an entity’s own operational metrics, rather than market-based variables, and clarifies that share-based or warrant consideration received from a customer is accounted for under Topic 606 until the right to retain the instrument is unconditional, after which the guidance in Topic 815 and 321 applies. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026, with early adoption permitted, and may be applied prospectively or on a modified retrospective basis with an option to elect or revoke the fair value option for certain instruments upon transition. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on the Company’s accounting and related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. In May 2025, the FASB also issued ASU 2025-04, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718) and Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Clarifications to Share-Based Consideration Payable to a Customer, to address diversity in practice and improve the operability of accounting for share-based consideration granted to customers. The amendments clarify how to distinguish between service and performance conditions for vesting, require entities to estimate forfeitures for all share-based consideration payable to customers, and specify that variable consideration guidance in ASC 606 does not apply when measuring such awards. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on the Company’s accounting and related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements In May 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-03, Business Combinations (Topic 805) and Consolidation (Topic 810): Determining the Accounting Acquirer in the Acquisition of a Variable Interest Entity, which amends existing guidance to allow entities to apply the same principles used in other business combinations when determining the accounting acquirer in a transaction involving a variable interest entity (VIE) that is a business and where consideration is primarily in the form of equity interests. This update addresses comparability concerns and provides for more consistent application of acquisition accounting principles. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on the Company’s accounting and related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income-Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (“ASU 2024-03”) which requires disaggregated disclosure of income statement expenses for public business entities. Additionally, in January 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-01 to clarify the effective date of ASU 2024-03. The ASU does not change the expense captions an entity presents on the face of the income statement; rather, it requires disaggregation of certain expense captions into specified categories in disclosures within the footnotes to the financial statements. This guidance applies to all public business entities and is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The requirements will be applied prospectively with the option for retrospective application. The Company is currently reviewing this ASU to determine the impact on its disclosures within the footnotes to its consolidated financial statements. In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-04, Induced Conversions of Convertible Debt Instruments (Topic 470) (“ASU 2024-04”). ASU 2024-04 clarifies the assessment of whether a transaction should be accounted for as an induced conversion or extinguishment of convertible debt when changes are made to conversion features as part of an offer to settle the instrument. ASU 2024-04 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this new standard will have on the Company’s accounting and related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements.

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2025

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).

Principles of Consolidation

All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with current period presentation.

Use of Estimates in the Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates are used for (but are not limited to) such items as the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations, fair value of contingent consideration issued in a business combination, the establishment of useful lives for property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, the fair value of equity securities or warrants to purchase the Company’s Common Stock issued individually or as a component of a debt or equity offering, the fair value of changes to the conversion terms of embedded conversion features, the fair value and requisite service periods of stock-based compensation, the fair value of assets received in nonmonetary transactions, the establishment of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities that arise from leasing arrangements, the timing of commencement of capitalization for plant and equipment, impairment of indefinite-lived intangible assets, impairment of long-lived assets, recoverability of deferred tax assets, amortization of deferred issuance costs and debt discount, the fair value of leased assets for the purpose of lease classification, and the recording of various accruals. These estimates are made after considering past and current events and assumptions about future events. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). The core principle of the revenue standard is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The following five steps are applied to achieve that core principle:

•Step 1: Identify the contract with the customer

•Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract

•Step 3: Determine the transaction price

•Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract

•Step 5: Recognize revenue when the Company satisfies a performance obligation

In order to identify the performance obligations in a contract with a customer, a company must assess the promised goods or services in the contract and identify each promised good or service that is distinct. A performance obligation meets ASC 606’s definition of a “distinct” good or service (or bundle of goods or services) if both of the following criteria are met: the customer can benefit from the good or service either on its own or together with other resources that are readily available to the customer (i.e., the good or service is capable of being distinct), and the entity’s promise to transfer the good or service to the customer is separately identifiable from other promises in the contract (i.e., the promise to transfer the good or service is distinct within the context of the contract). If a good or service is not distinct, the good or service is combined with other promised goods or services until a bundle of goods or services is identified that is distinct.

The transaction price is the amount of consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods or services to a customer. The consideration promised in a contract with a customer may include fixed amounts, variable amounts, or both. When determining the transaction price, an entity must consider the effects of all of the following:

•Variable consideration

•Constraining estimates of variable consideration

•The existence of a significant financing component in the contract

•Noncash consideration

•Consideration payable to a customer

Variable consideration is included in the transaction price only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved. The transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation on a relative standalone selling price basis. The transaction price allocated to each performance obligation is recognized when that performance obligation is satisfied, at a point in time or over time as appropriate.

Mining Pool

The Company has entered into an arrangement with a cryptocurrency mining pool (the Foundry USA Pool) to perform hash computations (i.e. hashrate) for the mining pool in exchange for consideration. Providing hash computation services to a mining pool is an output of the Company’s ordinary activities. The provision of such hash computation services is the sole performance obligation. The mining pool arrangement is terminable at any time without substantial penalty by Foundry USA Pool and may be terminated without substantial penalty by the Company upon providing one Contract Day’s, as defined, prior written notice. The Company’s enforceable right to compensation only begins when and continues while the Company provides hash computation services to its customer, the mining pool operator. Accordingly, the contract term with Foundry USA Pool is deemed to be less than 24 hours and to continuously renew throughout the day. Additionally, the Company concluded that the mining pool operator’s (i.e., the customer’s) renewal right is not a material right because the renewal rights do not include any discounts; that is, the terms, conditions, and compensation amounts are at the then-current market rates.

There is no significant financing component in these transactions.

The mining pool applies the Full Pay Per Share (“FPPS”) payout model. Under the FPPS model, in exchange for providing hash computation services to the pool, the Company is entitled to pay-per-share base amount and transaction fee reward compensation, calculated on a daily basis, at an amount that approximates the total bitcoin that could have been mined and transaction fees that could have been awarded using the Company’s hash computation services, based upon the then current blockchain difficulty. Under this model, the Company is entitled to compensation, payable in bitcoin, regardless of whether the pool operator successfully records a block to the bitcoin blockchain.

The transaction consideration the Company receives, if any, is noncash consideration and is all variable. Because digital assets are considered noncash consideration, fair value of the digital asset award received would generally be determined using the quoted price of the related digital asset in the Company’s principal market at the time of contract inception. The Company has adopted an accounting policy to aggregate individual contracts with individual terms less than 24 hours within each intraday period and apply a consistent valuation point, the start of day Coordinated Universal Time (00:00:00 UTC), to value the related noncash consideration. Revenue is recognized when it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur, which is the same day that control of the contracted service transfers to the mining pool and is the same day as the contract inception. After every 24-hour contract term, the mining pool transfers the digital asset consideration to the Company’s designated digital currency wallets.

Consideration payable to the customer in the form of a pool operator fee, which is incurred only to the extent that the Company has generated FPPS consideration, is deducted from the bitcoin the Company receives and is recorded as contra-revenue, as it does not represent a payment for a distinct good or service.

The Company recorded revenue from mining of $151.6 million, $139.3 million, and $61.7 million during the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively.

Bitcoin Miner Hosting

The Company had one bitcoin miner hosting contract which expired in February 2024. At the time of contract inception, the quoted price of bitcoin in the Company’s principal market was approximately $38,000. The Company recorded bitcoin miner hosting revenue of $0.8 million and $7.5 million during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

HPC Leasing

In December 2024 and August 2025, the Company entered into long-term datacenter lease agreements (the “Core42 HPC Leases” and the “Fluidstack HPC Leases”, respectively, and collectively, the “HPC Leases”) with customers for specified datacenter infrastructure at the Lake Mariner Data Campus to support the customers’ HPC operations. In accordance with ASC 842, Leases, the Company determined at contract inception that these agreements contained a lease, comprising lease components related to the right to use datacenter space and nonlease components for power delivery, physical security, and maintenance services. Certain of the Core42 HPC Leases commenced in 2025 and the remainder of the HPC Leases are expected to commence in 2026.

The Company has elected the practical expedient available under ASC 842 to combine the nonlease revenue components that have the same pattern of transfer as the related operating lease components into a single combined component. The single combined component is accounted for under ASC 842 as an operating lease if the lease components are the predominant components and is accounted for under ASC 606 if the nonlease components are the predominant components. The lease components are the predominant components in the Company’s HPC Leases and the single combined component in these arrangements are accounted for under the operating lease guidance of ASC 842. Recognition of HPC lease revenue begins when the Company determines the asset has been made available for the customer’s use.

The Company has concluded that it is probable that substantially all of the payments will be collected over the term of the arrangements and recognizes the total combined fixed payments under the agreements on a straight-line basis over the noncancellable term. The Company recognizes the difference between straight-line revenue recognized during the period and the lease payments due pursuant to the underlying arrangement as deferred rent liability or accrued rent receivable in the consolidated balance sheets. Certain arrangements include options to extend the term. These extension options are not reasonably certain to be exercised and are excluded from the lease term and calculation of lease payments at lease commencement.

Payments for physical security and other routine maintenance services are included in the fixed lease payments. The lease agreements provide for variable payments for power delivery. Power delivery services represent a stand-ready obligation to make power available to the customer over the coterminous lease term and have the same pattern of transfer as the related operating lease components. Customers are charged monthly for actual power costs incurred at current utility rates. These payments from customers for power delivery are recognized as variable lease payments in accordance with the practical expedient elected. Variable lease payments are presented on a gross basis and are included in HPC lease revenue in the consolidated statements of operations.

The lease agreements also provide for variable payments for certain fit-out services as requested by the customer and the Company recognizes revenues as performance obligations are satisfied. In the course of providing its services, the Company routinely subcontracts for services and incurs other direct costs on behalf of its customers. These costs are passed through to the customers, generally with a mark-up, and, in accordance with GAAP, are included in the Company’s HPC lease revenue.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue for mining pool revenue is comprised primarily of direct costs of electricity, but excludes depreciation which is separately presented. Cost of revenue for bitcoin miner hosting is comprised primarily of direct costs of electricity,

labor and internet provision. Cost of revenue for HPC lease revenue is comprised primarily of direct costs of electricity and also includes costs incurred by the Company in connection with its fit-out services under the HPC Leases.

Power Curtailment Credits

Proceeds from participation in demand response programs are recorded as a reduction in cost of revenue in the consolidated statements of operations for the period in which the corresponding demand response program occurs.

Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Highly liquid instruments with an original maturity of three months or less are classified as cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $3,266.4 million and $274.1 million, respectively.

The Company maintains cash and cash equivalent balances primarily at three financial institutions that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The Company’s accounts at these institutions are insured, up to $250,000, by the FDIC. As of December 31, 2025, the Company bank balances exceeded the FDIC insurance limit by $3,649.0 million. To reduce its risk associated with the failure of such financial institutions, the Company evaluates at least annually the rating of the financial institutions in which it holds deposits.

Restricted Cash

The Company considers cash and marketable securities to be restricted when withdrawal or general use is legally restricted. The Company reports restricted cash in the consolidated balance sheets and determines current or noncurrent classification based on the expected duration of the restriction.

Nonmonetary Transactions

The Company accounts for goods and services exchanged in nonmonetary transactions at fair value unless the underlying exchange transaction lacks commercial substance or the fair value of the assets received or relinquished is not reasonably determinable, in which case the nonmonetary exchange would be measured based on the recorded amount of the nonmonetary asset relinquished.

Digital Assets

Digital assets consists of bitcoin earned as noncash consideration for providing hash computation services to a mining pool and for bitcoin miner hosting services, in accordance with the Company’s revenue recognition policy. From time to time, the Company also received bitcoin as distributions-in-kind from its Nautilus Joint Venture. Digital assets is classified as a

current asset in the consolidated balance sheets as it is highly liquid and the Company expects to sell it within the next twelve months to support operations.

In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2023-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Crypto Assets (Subtopic 350-60): Accounting for and Disclosure of Crypto Assets (“ASU 2023-08”). The new standard requires certain crypto assets to be subsequently measured at fair value, with changes recognized in net income each reporting period. The Company elected to early adopt ASU 2023-08 effective January 1, 2024, resulting in a cumulative-effect change of $37,000, increasing the digital asset balance and decreasing the opening balance of accumulated deficit in the consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2024.

Following adoption of ASU 2023-08, the Company measures digital assets at fair value each reporting period in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement (“ASC 820”). Fair value is determined using Level 1 inputs based on quoted prices from the active trading platform on which the Company regularly transacts, which is considered its principal market for bitcoin. Because bitcoin is continuously traded, the Company uses the midnight UTC price to align with its revenue recognition policy. Gains and losses from remeasurement are included within “loss (gain) on fair value of digital assets, net” in the consolidated statements of operations.

For bitcoin sales, gains and losses are calculated as the difference between cash proceeds and the cost basis, using a first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. These gains and losses are also included within “loss (gain) on fair value of digital assets, net” in the consolidated statements of operations. During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company recorded loss (gain) on fair value of digital assets, net of $0.6 million and $(2.2) million, respectively.

Accounting for Digital Assets Prior to ASU 2023-08

Before adopting ASU 2023-08, the Company accounted for bitcoin as an indefinite-lived intangible asset. Under this model, digital assets were not amortized, but assessed for impairment annually, or more frequently if events indicated a potential impairment. An impairment loss was recognized if the carrying amount exceeded fair value, determined using Level 1 inputs under ASC 820.

For impairment testing, the Company bypassed the optional qualitative assessment and monitored daily bitcoin price movements. The lowest intraday trading price was used to determine impairment at the single bitcoin level, with any excess of the carrying amount over the lowest daily trading price recorded as an impairment loss. Once impaired, the new cost basis was established, and subsequent reversals were prohibited. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company recognized digital assets impairment losses of $3.0 million.

Statement of Cash Flows Treatment

Bitcoin earned through mining activities is recorded as an adjustment in the consolidated statements of cash flows, reconciling net loss to cash flows from operating activities. Bitcoin received as distributions-in-kind from equity investees is disclosed in supplemental noncash investing activities.

Following the repayment of the Term Loans in July 2024 (see Note 10), the Company no longer converts bitcoin into cash immediately. Prior to the repayments of the Term Loans in July 2024, proceeds from sales of digital assets were included in cash flows from operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows as bitcoin was converted nearly immediately into cash during that period. Subsequently, proceeds from sales of digital assets are included within cash flows from investing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows as bitcoin has not been converted nearly immediately into cash.

Concentrations

During 2025, the Company contracted with one supplier for the provision of bitcoin miners and, historically, primarily contracted with two suppliers for the provision of bitcoin miners. In addition, the Company primarily contracted with one mining pool operator during the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023. During the year end December 31, 2025, the Company’s HPC lease revenue was generated from one customer. The Company does not believe that these counterparties represent a significant performance risk. Revenue from one bitcoin miner hosting customer represented 10.9% of consolidated revenue for the year ended December 31, 2023. During the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024,

and 2023, the Company operations were predominately bitcoin mining. If the market value of bitcoin declines significantly, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company may be adversely affected.

Business Combinations

The Company includes the results of operations of the businesses it acquires as of the acquisition date. The Company allocates the purchase price of the acquisitions to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. The excess of the purchase price over the fair values of identifiable assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill. Contingent consideration is included within the purchase price and is recognized at its fair value on the acquisition date. A liability resulting from contingent consideration is remeasured to fair value as of each reporting date until the contingency is resolved, and subsequent changes in fair value are recognized in earnings.

While the Company uses its best estimates and assumptions to accurately apply preliminary values to assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date as well as contingent consideration, where applicable, these estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, the Company records adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the values of the assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations. Accounting for business combinations requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially at the acquisition date, including estimates for assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and contingent consideration, where applicable. Although the Company believes the assumptions and estimates it has made have been reasonable and appropriate, they are based in part on historical experience and information obtained from management of the acquired companies and are inherently uncertain. Critical estimates include valuation of the contingent consideration transferred, and assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that may affect the accuracy or validity of such assumptions, estimates, or actual results. Acquisition-related expenses are recognized separately from the business combination and are expensed as incurred.

Goodwill

The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently when an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. The Company may elect to utilize a qualitative assessment to evaluate whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value and if so, it performs a quantitative test.

If a quantitative test is required, the Company estimates the fair value of the reporting unit using discounted cash flows. The Company’s analyses require significant assumptions and judgments, including assumptions about future economic conditions, revenue growth, and operating margins, among other factors. Events or changes in circumstances considered in the qualitative analysis, many of which are subjective in nature, include: a significant negative trend in the Company’s industry or overall economic trends, a significant change in how the Company uses the acquired assets, a significant change in business strategy, a significant decrease in the market value of the asset, and a significant change in regulations or in the industry that could affect the value of the asset. The Company compares the carrying value of each reporting unit to its estimated fair value and if the fair value is determined to be less than the carrying value, the Company would recognize an impairment loss for the difference.

Equity Method of Accounting

Investee companies that are not consolidated, but over which the Company exercises significant influence, are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Whether or not the Company exercises significant influence with respect to an investee depends on an evaluation of several factors including, among others, representation on the investee company’s board of directors and ownership level, which is generally a 20% to 50% interest in the voting securities of the investee company. Under the equity method of accounting, an investee company’s accounts are not reflected within the Company’s consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations; however, the Company’s share of the earnings or losses of the investee company is reflected in equity in net (loss) income of investee, net of tax in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company’s carrying value in an equity method investee company is reflected in equity in net assets of investee in the consolidated balance sheets.

Interest related to construction of assets at equity method investee companies is capitalized when the financial statement effect of capitalization is material, construction of the asset at the equity method investee has begun, the equity method investee has not commenced its principal operations and interest is being incurred. Interest capitalization ends at the earlier of the asset being substantially complete and ready for its intended use, the equity method investee commences principal operations or when interest costs are no longer being incurred.

Equity method investments are regularly reviewed to determine whether a significant event or change in circumstances has occurred that may impact the fair value of each investment. If the fair value of the investment has dropped below the carrying amount, management considers several factors when determining whether an other-than-temporary decline in market value has occurred, including the length of time and extent to which the market value has been below cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value and other factors influencing the fair market value, such as general market conditions.

When the Company’s carrying value in an equity method investee company is reduced to zero, no further losses are recorded in the Company’s consolidated financial statements unless the Company has guaranteed obligations of the investee company or has committed additional funding. When the investee company subsequently reports income, the Company will not record its share of such income until it equals the amount of its share of losses not previously recognized.

Variable Interest Entities

Variable interest entities (“VIE”) are legal entities in which equity investors do not have (i) sufficient equity at risk for the legal entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, or (ii) as a group, the power, through voting or similar rights, to direct the activities of the legal entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance, or (iii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the legal entity or the right to receive expected residual returns of the legal entity. The Company would consolidate any VIE in which it has a controlling financial interest through being deemed to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE. The primary beneficiary of a VIE has both of the following characteristics: (1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact its economic performance; and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could be significant to the VIE. If both characteristics are met, the Company considers itself to be the primary beneficiary and therefore will consolidate that VIE into its consolidated financial statements.

The Company determines whether it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE upon initial involvement with a VIE and reassesses whether it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE on an ongoing basis. The determination of whether an entity is a VIE and whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE is based upon facts and circumstances for the VIE and requires significant judgments such as whether the entity is a VIE, whether the Company’s interest in a VIE is a variable interest, the determination of the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the entity, whether the Company controls those activities, and whether the Company has the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could be significant to the VIE.

Abernathy Joint Venture

In 2025, the Company entered into the Abernathy Joint Venture. The Company determined the Abernathy Joint Venture is a VIE, and while the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence over the Abernathy Joint Venture, the Company determined that it did not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact its economic performance. As such, the Company determined that it was not the primary beneficiary of the Abernathy Joint Venture and, therefore, will account for this entity under the equity method of accounting. There is no basis difference between the carrying amount of our investment and our share of the underlying net assets. See Note 12 for additional information.

Nautilus Joint Venture

In 2021, the Company entered into a joint venture, Nautilus Cryptomine LLC (“Nautilus”), with an unrelated co-venturer to develop, construct and operate up to 300 MW of zero-carbon bitcoin mining in Pennsylvania. Due to the initial nature of the Nautilus Joint Venture and the continued commitment for additional financing, the Company determined Nautilus was a VIE. While the Company had the ability to exercise significant influence over Nautilus, the Company determined that it did not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of Nautilus.

Initially, the power to direct the activities of Nautilus that most significantly impact Nautilus’ economic performance were shared equally by both parties within the Nautilus Joint Venture due to the requirement for both equity holders to approve many of the key operating decisions and when not equally shared, were predominantly under the control of the co-venturer, including through the co-venturer’s majority representation on the board of managers. As such, the Company determined that it was not the primary beneficiary of Nautilus and, therefore, had accounted for this entity under the equity method of accounting. Risks associated with the Company’s involvement with Nautilus included a commitment to potentially fund additional equity investments.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets (generally 5 years for computer equipment and 4 years for miners). Leasehold improvements and electrical equipment are depreciated over the shorter of their estimated useful lives (25 years) or the lease term. Changes in depreciation and amortization, generally accelerated depreciation and variable amortization, are determined and recorded when estimates of the remaining useful lives or residual values of long-term assets change. Property, plant and equipment included deposits on miners amounting to approximately $0 and $53.9 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, which would be included in property, plant and equipment upon receipt.

Interest related to construction of assets is capitalized when the financial statement effect of capitalization is material, construction of the asset has begun, and interest is being incurred. Interest capitalization ends at the earlier of the asset being substantially complete and ready for its intended use or when interest costs are no longer being incurred.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

The Company reviews its long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset, or asset group, may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. Any impairment loss recorded is measured as the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.

Leases

In accordance with ASC 842, at inception of a contract, the Company determines whether the contract is or contains a lease. If the Company is the lessee, the lease is classified as an operating or finance lease at the commencement date. Operating leases are included in operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) asset, current portion of operating lease liability, and operating lease liability, net of current portion in the consolidated balance sheets. Finance leases are included in finance lease right-of-use asset, current portion of finance lease liabilities, and finance lease liabilities, net of current portion in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company does not recognize a ROU asset or lease liability for short-term leases having initial terms of 12 months or less and instead recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had one short-term lease. The Company did not have any short-term leases as of December 31, 2024.

In an arrangement that is determined to be or contain a lease, the Company includes both the lease and nonlease components as a single component and accounts for it as a lease when the Company would otherwise recognize the cost associated with both the lease and nonlease components in a similar fashion.

ROU assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent the Company’s obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. ROU assets and lease liabilities are recognized at commencement date, and subsequently remeasured upon changes to the underlying lease arrangement, based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. If the rate implicit in the lease is not readily determinable, the Company generally uses an estimate of its incremental borrowing rate based on the estimated rate of interest for collateralized borrowing over a similar term of the lease payments at the commencement date. The ROU asset also includes any lease prepayments made and excludes lease incentives. The Company’s lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise that option.

Costs associated with operating lease ROU assets are recognized on a straight-line basis within operating expenses or selling, general and administrative, as appropriate, over the term of the lease. Variable lease costs are recognized as incurred and primarily consist of common area maintenance charges not included in the measurement of right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities. Finance lease ROU assets are amortized within operating expenses or selling, general and administrative expenses, as appropriate, on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or, in the instance where title does not transfer at the end of the lease term, the lease term. The interest component of a finance lease is included in interest expense and recognized using the effective interest method over the lease term.

Debt Issuance Costs and Debt Discount

Debt issuance costs and debt discount are recorded as a direct reduction of the carrying amount of the debt and are amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the contractual term of the debt and in consideration of expected future principal payments including, when applicable, payments subject to an excess cash flow sweep (see Note 10). Debt issuance costs include incremental third-party costs directly related to debt issuance such as attorney and financial advisor fees. Debt discount includes upfront fees and proceeds allocated to other components included in the debt issuance. The allocation of proceeds between the debt instrument and any other components included in the debt issuance, including Common Stock or warrants to purchase Common Stock, is generally based on the relative fair value allocation method.

Debt Modification

The Company evaluates amendments to its debt instruments in accordance with ASC 470-50, Debt Modifications and Extinguishments. This evaluation includes comparing (1) if applicable, the change in fair value of an embedded conversion option to that of the carrying amount of the debt immediately prior to amendment and (2) the net present value of future cash flows of the amended debt to that of the original debt to determine, in each case, if a change greater than 10% occurred. In instances where the net present value of future cash flows or the fair value of an embedded conversion option, if any, changed more than 10%, the Company applies extinguishment accounting. In instances where the net present value of future cash flows and the fair value of an embedded conversion option, if any, changed less than 10%, the Company accounts for the amendment to the debt as a debt modification. For debt that has been amended more than once in a twelve-month period, the debt terms that existed just prior to the earliest amendment occurring in the prior twelve months are applied to the 10% test, provided modification accounting was previously applied. Gains and losses on debt amendments that are considered extinguishments are recognized in current earnings. Debt amendments that are considered debt modifications are accounted for prospectively through yield adjustments, based on the revised terms. Legal fees and other costs incurred with third parties that are directly related to debt modifications are expensed as incurred and generally are included in interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations. Amounts paid by the Company to the lenders, including upfront fees and the fair value of warrants issued, are included in future cash flows for accounting treatment determination and, if debt modification is applicable, are also included in the determination of yield adjustment.

Convertible Instruments

The Company accounts for its issuance of convertible debt and convertible equity instruments in accordance with applicable U.S. GAAP. In connection with that accounting, the Company assesses the various terms and features of the agreement in accordance with ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (“ASC 480”), and ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging Activities (“ASC 815”). ASC 480 requires liability accounting for certain financial instruments, including shares that embody an unconditional obligation to transfer a variable number of shares, provided that the monetary value of the obligation is based solely or predominantly on one of the following three characteristics: (1) a fixed monetary amount known at inception, (2) variations in something other than the fair value of the issuer’s equity shares or (3) variations in the fair value of the issuer’s equity shares, but the monetary value to the counterparty moves in the opposite direction as the value of the issuer’s shares. In accordance with ASC 815, the Company assesses the various terms and features of the agreement to determine whether or not they contain embedded derivative instruments that are required under ASC 815 to be accounted for separately from the host contract and recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. The fair value of derivative liabilities, if any, is required to be revalued at each reporting date, with corresponding changes in fair value recorded in the current period’s operating results.

Derivatives

The Company does not apply hedge accounting to its derivatives. Rather, changes in the fair values of derivatives for a particular period are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company evaluates its contracts to determine if they meet the definition of a derivative instrument. If a contract meets the definition, the Company evaluates whether it qualifies for the normal purchases and normal sales exemption and may elect the exemption if the criteria is met.

Warrants

The Company applies ASC 480 and ASC 815 to assist in the determination of whether warrants issued for the purchase of Common Stock should be classified as liabilities or equity. Warrants that are determined to require liability classification are measured at fair value upon issuance and are subsequently remeasured to their then fair value at each subsequent reporting period with changes in fair value recorded in current earnings. Warrants that are determined to require equity classification are measured at fair value upon issuance and are not subsequently remeasured unless they are required to be reclassified. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had recorded warrant liabilities of $844.7 million relating to the warrants issued in connection with the Google Backstop (see Note 8). All other outstanding warrants granted by the Company have been classified as equity.

Stock Issuance Costs

Stock issuance costs are recorded as a reduction to issuance proceeds. Stock issuance costs incurred prior to the closing of the related issuances, including under shelf registration statements, are recorded in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets if the closing of the related issuance is deemed probable.

Stock-based Compensation

The Company periodically issues restricted stock units (“RSU”) and restricted stock to employees and non-employees in non-capital raising transactions for services. In accordance with ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”), the Company measures stock-based compensation cost at the grant date, based on the estimated fair value of the award. For RSUs with time-based vesting, the fair value is determined by the Company’s stock price on the date of grant. For RSUs with vesting based on market conditions (“PSUs”), the effect of the market condition is considered in the determination of fair value on the grant date using a Monte Carlo simulation model. As of December 31, 2025, the Company has not issued stock options.

Expense for RSUs is recognized on a straight-line basis over the employee’s or non-employee’s requisite service period, including the derived service period for RSUs with market conditions. Expense for restricted stock is recognized on the date of grant as the awards are fully vested on the grant date. Stock-based compensation for PSUs is recorded over the derived service period unless the market condition is satisfied in advance of the derived service period, in which case a cumulative catch-up is recognized as of the date of achievement. Stock-based compensation for PSUs is recorded regardless of whether the market conditions are met unless the service conditions are not met. The Company accounts for forfeitures as they occur. The Company recognizes excess tax benefits or deficiencies on vesting or settlement of awards as discrete items within income tax benefit or provision within net loss and the related cash flows are classified within operating activities.

Other Income

Other income consists primarily of interest income on bank deposits.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes pursuant to the provision of ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes (“ASC 740”), which requires, among other things, an asset and liability approach to calculating deferred income taxes. The asset and liability approach requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is provided to offset any net deferred tax assets for which management believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company follows the provision of ASC 740 related to accounting for uncertain income tax positions. When tax returns are filed, it is more likely than not that some positions taken would be sustained upon

examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. In accordance with the guidance of ASC 740, the benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. The tax benefits recognized in the consolidated financial statements from such positions are then measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with the tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above are reflected as a liability for uncertain tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheets along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination.

The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties that would be assessed in relation to the settlement value of unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense.

Loss per Share

The Company computes earnings (loss) per share using the two-class method required for participating securities. The two-class method requires income available to common stockholders for the period to be allocated between Common Stock and participating securities based upon their respective rights to receive dividends as if all income for the period had been distributed.

Basic loss per share of Common Stock is calculated by dividing the Company’s net loss by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period. Convertible preferred stock is considered a participating security because it shares on a pro rata basis in any dividends declared on Common Stock. However, since it does not participate in the Company’s losses, it is excluded from the computation of basic net loss per share. Diluted loss per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if other instruments were converted into Common Stock, using the treasury stock method or if-converted method, as applicable. However, for periods in which the Company reports a net loss, all potentially dilutive instruments are excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share, as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. Subsequent to December 31, 2023, the Company determined that its preferred stock dividends would be excluded as a reduction to net loss on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations, and accordingly be excluded from the Company’s computation of basic loss per common share. Previously, the Company had included dividends in this calculation.

The Company’s dilutive instruments or participating securities as of December 31, 2025 included Common Stock warrants, convertible notes, and RSUs issued for services. The Company’s dilutive instruments or participating securities as of December 31, 2024 included convertible preferred stock, Common Stock warrants, convertible notes, and RSUs issued for services.

Segment Reporting

The Company has two operating segments: “Digital Asset Mining,” consisting of providing hash computation services to a mining pool operator and “HPC Leasing,” consisting of providing high-density colocation services to third parties for HPC operations and all operations are domiciled in the United States of America. The reportable segments are identified based on the types of services performed. The Company’s HPC Leasing operations met the criteria to be considered a new segment during the third quarter of 2025. The Digital Asset Mining segment generates revenue from operating owned digital infrastructure and computer equipment as part of a pool of users that process transactions conducted on one or more blockchain networks. In exchange for these services, the Company receives digital assets. The HPC Leasing segment generates revenue through lease agreements providing the right to use datacenter space and providing power delivery, physical security, and maintenance services.

The Company’s operations are evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision–making group (“CODM”), which is composed of the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technology Officer and Chief Strategy Officer, to assess performance and allocate resources. The CODM uses segment profit (loss) to evaluate performance and allocate resources. Segment profit (loss) is used to evaluate actual results against expectations, which are based on comparable prior results, and current budget. Segment profit (loss) is also used in deciding how profits and cash flows will be reinvested or

otherwise deployed. No asset information for reportable segments is provided to the CODM as the CODM does not evaluate performance or allocate resources based on segment asset or liability information; accordingly, the Company has not presented a measure of assets by segment. The segments’ accounting policies are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The Company excludes certain operating expenses and other expenses from the allocations to operating segments.

Prior to the third quarter of 2025, the Company had one segment, Digital Asset Mining, such that the CODM was regularly provided only with consolidated expense data, as presented in the consolidated statements of operations. The CODM managed this segment using consolidated net loss as the primary measure of performance. In the third quarter of 2025, the Company changed the composition of its reportable segments and, accordingly, has recast its segment information for the year ended December 31, 2024 (see Note 19).

Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations Classification

The Company classifies a business as held for sale in the period in which management commits to a plan to sell the business, the business is available for immediate sale in its present condition, an active program to complete the plan to sell the business is initiated, the sale of the business within one year is probable and the business is being marketed at a reasonable price in relation to its fair value.

Newly acquired businesses that meet the held-for-sale classification criteria upon acquisition are reported as discontinued operations. Upon a business’ classification as held for sale, net assets are measured for impairment. An impairment loss is recorded for long-lived assets held for sale when the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value less cost to sell. Other assets and liabilities are generally measured for impairment by comparing their carrying values to their respective fair values. A long-lived asset is not depreciated or amortized while it is classified as held for sale.

Recent Accounting Standards

Adopted

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (“ASU 2023-09”). ASU 2023-09 expands existing income tax disclosures for rate reconciliations by requiring disclosure of certain specific categories and additional reconciling items that meet the quantitative threshold and expands disclosures for income taxes paid by requiring disaggregation by certain jurisdictions, amount of income taxes separated by federal and individual jurisdiction, and the amount of income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax expense (benefit) disaggregated between federal, state, and foreign. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this new standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2023, the FASB issued an ASU 2023-05, Business Combinations - Joint Venture Formations (Subtopic 805-60): Recognition and Initial Measurement, that requires a joint venture, upon formation, to measure its assets and liabilities at fair value in its standalone financial statements. A joint venture must recognize the difference between the fair value of its equity and the fair value of its identifiable assets and liabilities as goodwill (or an equity adjustment, if negative) using the business combination accounting guidance regardless of whether the net assets meet the definition of a business. The adoption of this new standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Issued — Not Yet Adopted

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-11, Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Narrow-Scope Improvements (ASU 2025-11), which clarifies interim disclosure requirements and the applicability of Topic 270. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. Upon adoption, the guidance can be applied prospectively or retrospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard will have on the Company’s disclosures in the consolidated financial statements.

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-07, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) and Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Scope Clarification and Accounting for Certain Contracts and Customer Share-Based Consideration (“ASU 2025-07”), which narrows the types of contracts subject to derivative accounting by excluding those whose payouts depend solely on an entity’s own operational metrics, rather than market-based variables, and clarifies that

share-based or warrant consideration received from a customer is accounted for under Topic 606 until the right to retain the instrument is unconditional, after which the guidance in Topic 815 and 321 applies. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026, with early adoption permitted, and may be applied prospectively or on a modified retrospective basis with an option to elect or revoke the fair value option for certain instruments upon transition. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on the Company’s accounting and related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements.

In May 2025, the FASB also issued ASU 2025-04, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718) and Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Clarifications to Share-Based Consideration Payable to a Customer, to address diversity in practice and improve the operability of accounting for share-based consideration granted to customers. The amendments clarify how to distinguish between service and performance conditions for vesting, require entities to estimate forfeitures for all share-based consideration payable to customers, and specify that variable consideration guidance in ASC 606 does not apply when measuring such awards. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on the Company’s accounting and related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements

In May 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-03, Business Combinations (Topic 805) and Consolidation (Topic 810): Determining the Accounting Acquirer in the Acquisition of a Variable Interest Entity, which amends existing guidance to allow entities to apply the same principles used in other business combinations when determining the accounting acquirer in a transaction involving a variable interest entity (VIE) that is a business and where consideration is primarily in the form of equity interests. This update addresses comparability concerns and provides for more consistent application of acquisition accounting principles. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on the Company’s accounting and related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements.

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income-Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (“ASU 2024-03”) which requires disaggregated disclosure of income statement expenses for public business entities. Additionally, in January 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-01 to clarify the effective date of ASU 2024-03. The ASU does not change the expense captions an entity presents on the face of the income statement; rather, it requires disaggregation of certain expense captions into specified categories in disclosures within the footnotes to the financial statements. This guidance applies to all public business entities and is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The requirements will be applied prospectively with the option for retrospective application. The Company is currently reviewing this ASU to determine the impact on its disclosures within the footnotes to its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-04, Induced Conversions of Convertible Debt Instruments (Topic 470) (“ASU 2024-04”). ASU 2024-04 clarifies the assessment of whether a transaction should be accounted for as an induced conversion or extinguishment of convertible debt when changes are made to conversion features as part of an offer to settle the instrument. ASU 2024-04 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this new standard will have on the Company’s accounting and related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements.