XML 25 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.25.1
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2025
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The following table presents the Company’s financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis and their level within the fair value hierarchy as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 (in thousands):
Fair Value Measured as of March 31, 2025
Carrying Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Digital currency$1,400 $1,400 $— $— 
$1,400 $1,400 $— $— 
Fair Value Measured as of December 31, 2024
Carrying ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Digital currency$476 $476 $— $— 
$476 $476 $— $— 
The Company has determined the fair value of convertible notes is approximately $343.0 million as of March 31, 2025 (see Note 8) using Level 1 inputs. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, prepaid expenses, other receivables, other current assets, accounts payable, accrued construction liabilities, accrued compensation, accrued interest and other accrued liabilities and other amounts due to related parties are considered to be representative of their respective fair values principally due to their short-term maturities. There were no additional material non-recurring fair value measurements as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, except for (i) the calculation of fair value of Common Stock issued in connection with the New Ground Lease (see Note 6), (ii) the calculation of fair value of Common Stock warrants issued in connection with amendments to the Company’s long-term debt agreement (see Note 8), in connection with the issuance of Common Stock (see Note 12), in connection with a Common Stock exchange agreement and on a standalone basis, (iii) and the calculation of fair value of nonmonetary assets distributed from the Company’s joint venture (see Note 9) and (v) the calculation of PSUs granted to employees as stock-based compensation (see Note 13).
The Company utilized a Black-Scholes option pricing model, along with a discount for lack of marketability (“DLOM”), to value its Common Stock warrants issued in connection with the Term Loans (as defined in Note 8). The DLOM reflects contractual restrictions on the exercise of the warrants. The estimated fair value of the warrants is classified as Level 3 measurement due to the use of unobservable inputs.
Key assumption used in the valuation model include expected share-price volatility, expected term, risk-free interest rate, dividend yield, and DLOM. Expected volatility is based on historic volatility of a peer group of publicly traded companies over the expected term of the warrants, which is assumed to be equal to the contractual term. The risk-free interest rate is derived from U.S. Treasury yields on the grant date with a maturity corresponding to the expected life of the warrants. The Company applies a dividend yield of zero, consistent with historical practice and expectations.
The Company applied a DLOM of 20% to value the warrants issued in connection with the First Amendment to the LGSA and a DLOM of 30% for warrants issued in connection with the Fifth Amendment.
In addition, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate the fair value of PSUs, incorporating historical and expected annual volatility of approximately 120%, based on both the Company’s and peer public companies’ data. A DLOM of 10.0% was applied in determining the fair value of the Common Stock issued in connection with the New Ground Lease.