XML 41 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.25.0.1
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2024
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
As a basis for considering such assumptions, a three-level fair value hierarchy prioritizing the inputs to valuation techniques is used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires the Company to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. The levels are as follows:
(Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
(Level 2) observable inputs for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable either directly or indirectly from market data; and
(Level 3) unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the Company to develop its own assumptions.
The following tables present the Company’s financial instruments that are measured and recorded at fair value on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets on a recurring basis, segregated by hierarchy fair value levels as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 (in thousands):
Fair Value Measured as of December 31, 2024
Carrying Value
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Remeasurement Loss
Digital currency
$476 $476 $— $— $— 
$476 $476 $— $— $— 
Fair Value Measured as of December 31, 2023
Carrying ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3Remeasurement Loss
Contingent consideration liability - Contingent Value Rights$— $— $— $— $(64)
$— $— $— $— $(64)
The Company has determined the fair value of convertible notes is approximately $490.7 million as of December 31, 2024 (see Note 9) using Level 1 inputs. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, prepaid expenses, other receivables, other current assets, accounts payable, accrued construction liabilities, other accrued liabilities and other amounts due to related parties are considered to be representative of their respective fair values principally due to their short-term maturities. There were no additional material non-recurring fair value measurements as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, except for (i) the calculation of fair value of Common Stock issued in connection with the New Ground Lease (see Note 7), (ii) the calculation of fair value of Common Stock warrants issued in connection with amendments to the Company’s long-term debt agreement (see Note 9), in connection with the issuance of Common Stock (see Note 16), in connection with a Common Stock exchange agreement (see Note 15) and on a standalone basis (see Note 15), (iii) the change in fair value of embedded derivatives in certain of the Company’s convertible promissory notes (see Note 10), and (iv) the calculation of fair value of nonmonetary assets distributed from the Company’s Joint Venture (see Note 11) and (v) the calculation of fair value of PSUs ranted to employees as stock-based compensation (see Note 16). The Company utilized a Black-Scholes option pricing model to value its Common Stock warrants (except as discussed above for warrants issued in connection with the New Term Facility and the Fifth Amendment) and to value the change in fair value of embedded derivatives in certain of the Company’s convertible promissory notes. The estimated fair value of the warrants and embedded derivatives is determined using Level 2 and Level 3 inputs. Inherent in the model and fair value estimate are assumptions related to expected share-price volatility, expected life, risk-free interest rate and dividend yield. The Company estimates volatility based on public company peer group volatility over the contractual term of the warrants. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury rate on the grant date for a maturity similar to the expected life of the warrants or the conversion term, as applicable. The dividend rate is based on the historical rate, which the Company anticipates will remain at zero.
The Company utilized a Black-Scholes option pricing model and the application of a discount for lack of marketability (“DLOM”) to value its Common Stock warrants issued in connection with the First Amendment to the LGSA and to value its Common Stock warrants issued in connection with the Fifth Amendment (each as defined in Note 9). The DLOM is applied primarily due to contractual restrictions on the exercise of the respective warrants. The estimated fair value of the warrants is determined using Level 3 inputs. Inherent in the model and fair value estimate are assumptions related to expected share-price volatility, expected life, risk-free interest rate, dividend yield and DLOM. The Company estimates volatility based on public company peer group volatility over the contractual term of the warrants. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury rate on the grant date for a maturity similar to the expected life of the warrants, which is assumed to be equivalent to their contractual term. The dividend rate is based on the historical rate, which the Company anticipates will remain at zero. The Company applied a DLOM of 20% to value its Common Stock warrants issued in connection with the First Amendment to the LGSA and applied a DLOM of 30% to value its Common Stock warrants issued in connection with the Fifth Amendment. The Company utilized a Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate the fair value of PSUs and the application of the Company’s and guideline public company historical and expected annual volatility of approximately 120%. The Company applied a DLOM of 10.0% in determining the fair value of the Common Stock issued in connection with the New Ground Lease.