N-CSR 1 d141199dncsr.htm N-CSR N-CSR

LOGO

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM N-CSR

 

 

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED

MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act file number: 811-09253

 

 

Wells Fargo Funds Trust

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

 

 

525 Market St., San Francisco, CA 94105

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

 

 

Catherine Kennedy

Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC

525 Market St., San Francisco, CA 94105

(Name and address of agent for service)

 

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 800-222-8222

Date of fiscal year end: May 31

Registrant is making a filing for 16 of its series:

Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund, Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund, Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund, Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund, Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund, Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund, Wells Fargo Index Fund, Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund Small Company Value Fund, Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund, Wells Fargo Real Return Fund, Wells Fargo Spectrum Income Allocation Fund, Wells Fargo Spectrum Growth Fund, Wells Fargo Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund, Wells Fargo Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund, and Wells Fargo Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund.

Date of reporting period: May 31, 2021

 

 

 


ITEM 1. REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS


Annual Report
May 31, 2021
Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund




Contents
 
Reduce clutter.
Save trees.
Sign up for electronic delivery of prospectuses and shareholder reports at wellsfargo.com/ advantagedelivery
The views expressed and any forward-looking statements are as of May 31, 2021, unless otherwise noted, and are those of the Fund's portfolio managers and/or Wells Fargo Asset Management. Discussions of individual securities or the markets generally are not intended as individual recommendations. Future events or results may vary significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. The views expressed are subject to change at any time in response to changing circumstances in the market. Wells Fargo Asset Management and the Fund disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any views expressed or forward-looking statements.
 INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED  ■  NO BANK GUARANTEE  ■  MAY LOSE VALUE 

Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund  |  1


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
Andrew Owen
President
Wells Fargo Funds
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to offer you this annual report for the Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021. Despite the initial challenges presented by the spread of COVID-19 cases and the business restrictions implemented throughout much of the world, global stocks showed robust returns, supported by global stimulus programs, a rapid vaccination rollout, and recovering consumer and corporate sentiment. Bond markets mostly produced positive returns, as investors searched for yield and diversification during difficult market stretches.
For the 12-month period, equities had robust returns, as policymakers continued to fight the effects of COVID-19. Emerging market stocks led both non-U.S. developed market equities and U.S. stocks. Gains by fixed-income securities were varied, though mostly positive. For the period, U.S. stocks, based on the S&P 500 Index,1 gained 40.32%. International stocks, as measured by the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net),2 returned 42.78%, while the MSCI EM Index (Net),3 had stronger performance, with a 51.00% gain. Among bond indexes, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index,4 returned -0.40%, the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (unhedged),5 gained 7.84%, the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index,6 returned 4.74%, and the ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index,7 returned 15.18%.
The COVID-19 lockdown began over a year ago.
By June, economies started to reopen and global central banks committed to do all they could to provide economic support through liquidity and low borrowing costs. U.S. economic activity was aided by one-time $1,200 stimulus checks and $600 weekly bonus unemployment benefits that lasted through July. However, unemployment remained historically high and COVID-19 cases began to increase by late June. China’s economic recovery began to pick up momentum.
July was broadly positive for equities and fixed income. However, economic data and a resurgence of COVID-19 cases underscored the urgent need to regain control of the pandemic. Second-quarter gross domestic product (GDP) shrank from the previous quarter by 9.5% and 12.1% in the U.S. and the eurozone, respectively. In contrast, China’s second-quarter GDP grew 3.2% year over year. The U.S. economy added 1.8 million jobs in July, but a double-digit jobless rate persisted.

1 The S&P 500 Index consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. It is a market-value-weighted index with each stock's weight in the index proportionate to its market value. You cannot invest directly in an index.
2 The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) All Country World Index (ACWI) ex USA Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed and emerging markets, excluding the United States. Source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI. You cannot invest directly in an index.
3 The MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure equity market performance of emerging markets. You cannot invest directly in an index.
4 The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based benchmark that measures the investment-grade, U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage pass-throughs), asset-backed securities, and commercial mortgage-backed securities. You cannot invest directly in an index.
5 The Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (unhedged) is an unmanaged index that provides a broad-based measure of the global investment-grade fixed-income markets excluding the U.S. dollar-denominated debt market. You cannot invest directly in an index.
6 The Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index composed of long-term tax-exempt bonds with a minimum credit rating of Baa. You cannot invest directly in an index.
7 The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index of domestic and Yankee high-yield bonds. The index tracks the performance of high-yield securities traded in the U.S. bond market. You cannot invest directly in an index. Copyright 2021. ICE Data Indices, LLC. All rights reserved.

2  |  Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
The stock market continued to rally in August despite concerns over rising numbers of U.S. and European COVID-19 cases as well as the July expiration of the $600 weekly bonus unemployment benefit. Relatively strong second-quarter earnings boosted investor sentiment along with the U.S. Federal Reserve Board’s (Fed’s) announcement of a monetary policy shift expected to support longer-term low interest rates. U.S. manufacturing and services activity indexes beat expectations while the U.S. housing market maintained strength. In Europe, retail sales expanded and consumer confidence was steady. China’s economy continued to expand.
Stocks grew more volatile in September on mixed economic data. U.S. economic activity continued to grow. However, U.S. unemployment remained elevated at 7.9% in September. With the U.S. Congress delaying further fiscal relief and uncertainties surrounding a possible vaccine, doubts crept back into the financial markets. In the U.K., a lack of progress in Brexit talks weighed on markets. China’s economy picked up steam, fueled by increased global demand.
In October, capital markets stepped back from their six-month rally. Market volatility rose in advance of the U.S. election and amid a global increase in COVID-19 infections. Europe introduced tighter restrictions affecting economic activity. U.S. markets looked favorably at the prospect of Democratic control of the federal purse strings, which could lead to additional fiscal stimulus and a boost to economic activity. Meanwhile, China reported 4.9% third-quarter GDP growth.
Global stocks rallied in November, propelled by optimism over three promising COVID-19 vaccines. Reversing recent trends, value stocks outperformed growth stocks and cyclical stocks outpaced information technology (IT) stocks. However, U.S. unemployment remained elevated, with a net job loss of 10 million since February. The eurozone services Purchasing Managers' Index, a monthly survey of purchasing managers, contracted sharply while the region’s manufacturing activity grew. The U.S. election results added to the upbeat mood as investors anticipated more consistent policies in the new administration.
Financial markets ended the year with strength on high expectations for a rapid rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines, the successful passage of a $900 billion stimulus package, and rising expectations of additional economic support from a Democratic-led Congress. U.S. economic data were mixed with still-elevated unemployment and weak retail sales but growth in manufacturing output. In contrast, China’s economic expansion continued in both manufacturing and nonmanufacturing. U.S. COVID-19 infection rates continued to rise even as new state and local lockdown measures were implemented.
The calendar year 2021 began with emerging market stocks leading all major asset classes in January, driven by China’s strong economic growth and a broad recovery in corporate earnings, which propelled China’s stock market higher. In the U.S., positive news on vaccine trials and January expansion in both the manufacturing and services sectors was offset by a weak December monthly jobs report. This was compounded by technical factors as some hedge funds were forced to sell stocks to protect themselves against a well-publicized short squeeze coordinated by a group of retail investors. Eurozone sentiment and economic growth were particularly weak, reflecting the impact of a new lockdown with stricter social distancing along with a slow vaccine rollout.
February saw major domestic equity indexes driven higher on the hope of a new stimulus bill, improving COVID-19 vaccination numbers, and the gradual reopening of the economy. Most S&P 500 companies reported better-than-expected earnings, with positive surprises coming from the financials, IT, health care, and materials sectors. Japan saw its economy strengthen as a result of strong export numbers. Meanwhile, crude oil prices continued their climb, rising more than 25% for the year. Domestic government bonds experienced a sharp sell-off in late February as markets priced in a more robust economic recovery and higher future growth and inflation expectations.
Global stocks rallied in November, propelled by optimism over three promising COVID-19 vaccines.

Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund  |  3


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
The passage of the massive domestic stimulus bill highlighted March activity, leading to increased forecasts for U.S. growth in 2021.
The passage of the massive domestic stimulus bill highlighted March activity, leading to increased forecasts for U.S. growth in 2021. Domestic employment surged as COVID-19 vaccinations and an increasingly open economy spurred hiring. A majority of U.S. small companies reported they were operating at pre-pandemic capacity or higher. Value stocks continued its outperformance of growth stocks in the month, continuing the trend that started in late 2020. Meanwhile, most major developed global equity indexes were up month to date on the back of rising optimism regarding the outlook for global growth. While the U.S. and U.K. have been the most successful in terms of the vaccine rollout, even in markets where the vaccine has lagged, such as in the eurozone and Japan, equity indexes in many of those countries have also been in positive territory this year.
Equity markets produced another strong showing in April. Domestically, the continued reopening of the economy had a strong impact on positive equity performance, as people started leaving their households and jobless claims continued to fall. Domestic corporate bonds performed well and the U.S. dollar weakened. Meanwhile, the U.S. government continued to seek to invest in the recovery, this time by outlining a package of over $2 billion to improve infrastructure. The primary headwind in April was inflation, as investors tried to determine the breadth and longevity of recent price increases. Developed Europe has been supported by a meaningful increase in the pace of vaccinations. Unfortunately many emerging market countries have not been as successful. India in particular has seen COVID-19 cases surge, serving as an example of the need to get vaccinations rolled out to less developed nations.
Vaccine rollouts continued in May, leading to loosened restrictions globally. As a result, equity markets in general saw a minor increase in returns. Concerns that the continued economic rebound could result in inflation increases becoming more than transitory were supported by the higher input costs businesses are experiencing. Meanwhile, those inflation concerns were tempered by the Fed, which stayed steady on its view of the economy and eased fears of a sudden and substantial policy change. Positive performance in the emerging market equity space was supported this month by steady consumer demand and strong commodity prices. Fixed-income markets were also slightly positive for the month, driven by inflation uncertainty and a softer U.S. dollar.
Don’t let short-term uncertainty derail long-term investment goals.
Periods of investment uncertainty can present challenges, but experience has taught us that maintaining long-term investment goals can be an effective way to plan for the future. Although diversification cannot guarantee an investment profit or prevent losses, we believe it can be an effective way to manage investment risk and potentially smooth out overall portfolio performance. We encourage investors to know their investments and to understand that appropriate levels of risk-taking may unlock opportunities.
Thank you for choosing to invest with Wells Fargo Funds. We appreciate your confidence in us and remain committed to helping you meet your financial needs.
Sincerely,
Andrew Owen
President
Wells Fargo Funds

For further information about your Fund, contact your investment professional, visit our website at wfam.com, or call us directly at 1-800-222-8222.

4  |  Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
Preparing for LIBOR Transition
The global financial industry is preparing to transition away from the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), a key benchmark interest rate, to new alternative rates. LIBOR underpins more than $350 trillion of financial contracts. It is the benchmark rate for a wide spectrum of products ranging from residential mortgages to corporate bonds to derivatives. Regulators have called for a market-wide transition away from LIBOR to successor reference rates by the end of 2021 (expected to be extended through June 30, 2023 for most tenors of the U.S. dollar LIBOR), which requires proactive steps be taken by issuers, counterparties, and asset managers to identify impacted products and adopt new reference rates.
The Fund invests in at least one underlying fund that holds one or more securities that use LIBOR as a floating reference rate and has a maturity date after December 31, 2021.
Although the transition process away from LIBOR has become increasingly well-defined in advance of the anticipated discontinuation date, there remains uncertainty regarding the nature of successor reference rates, and any potential effects of the transition away from LIBOR on investment instruments that use it as a benchmark rate. The transition process may result in, among other things, increased volatility or illiquidity in markets for instruments that currently rely on LIBOR and could negatively impact the value of certain instruments held by the Fund.
Wells Fargo Asset Management is monitoring LIBOR exposure closely and has put resources and controls in place to manage this transition effectively. The Fund’s portfolio management team is evaluating LIBOR holdings to understand what happens to those securities when LIBOR ceases to exist, including examining security documentation to identify the presence or absence of fallback language identifying a replacement rate to LIBOR.
While the pace of transition away from LIBOR will differ by asset class and investment strategy, the portfolio management team will monitor market conditions for those holdings to identify and mitigate deterioration or volatility in pricing and liquidity and ensure appropriate actions are taken in a timely manner.
Further information regarding the potential risks associated with the discontinuation of LIBOR can be found in the Fund’s Statement of Additional Information.

Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund  |  5


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Investment objective The Fund seeks long-term total return, consisting of capital appreciation and current income.
Manager Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC
Subadviser Wells Capital Management Incorporated
Portfolio managers Kandarp R. Acharya, CFA®, FRM, Petros N. Bocray, CFA®, FRM, Christian L. Chan, CFA®
    
Average annual total returns (%) as of May 31, 2021
    Including sales charge   Excluding sales charge   Expense ratios1 (%)
  Inception date 1 year 5 year 10 year   1 year 5 year 10 year   Gross Net 2
Class A (EAAFX) 7-29-1996 21.99 8.21 5.44   29.45 9.50 6.06   1.30 1.13
Class C (EACFX) 10-3-2002 28.19 8.81 5.33   29.19 8.81 5.33   2.05 1.88
Class R (EAXFX) 10-10-2003   29.44 9.29 5.83   1.55 1.38
Administrator Class (EAIFX) 10-3-2002   30.62 9.86 6.34   1.22 0.95
Institutional Class (EAAIX)3 11-30-2012   29.76 9.89 6.43   0.97 0.80
Asset Allocation Blended Index4   26.73 10.99 7.83  
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index5   -0.40 3.25 3.29  
MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net)6   42.78 10.88 5.36  
Russell 3000® Index7   43.91 17.36 14.21  
Figures quoted represent past performance, which is no guarantee of future results, and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder may pay on an investment in a fund. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance shown without sales charges would be lower if sales charges were reflected. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted, which assumes the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. Current month-end performance is available on the Fund’s website, wfam.com.
Please keep in mind that high double-digit returns were primarily achieved during favorable market conditions. You should not expect that such favorable returns can be consistently achieved. A fund’s performance, especially for short time periods, should not be the sole factor in making your investment decision.
Index returns do not include transaction costs associated with buying and selling securities, any mutual fund fees or expenses, or any taxes. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
For Class A shares, the maximum front-end sales charge is 5.75%. For Class C shares, the maximum contingent deferred sales charge is 1.00%. Performance including a contingent deferred sales charge assumes the sales charge for the corresponding time period. Class R, Administrator Class, and Institutional Class shares are sold without a front-end sales charge or contingent deferred sales charge.
1 Reflects the expense ratios as stated in the most recent prospectuses, which include the impact of 0.53% in acquired fund fees and expenses. The expense ratios shown are subject to change and may differ from the annualized expense ratios shown in the financial highlights of this report, which do not include acquired fund fees and expenses.
2 The manager has contractually committed through August 31, 2021, to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers at 1.13% for Class A, 1.88% for Class C, 1.38% for Class R, 0.95% for Administrator Class, and 0.80% for Institutional Class. Brokerage commissions, stamp duty fees, interest, taxes, acquired fund fees and expenses (if any) from funds in which the affiliated master portfolios and funds invest and from money market funds, and extraordinary expenses are excluded from the expense caps. All other acquired fund fees and expenses from the affiliated master portfolios are included in the expense caps. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. Without these caps, the Fund’s returns would have been lower. The expense ratio paid by an investor is the net expense ratio (the total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers) as stated in the prospectuses.
3 Historical performance shown for the Institutional Class shares prior to their inception reflects the performance of the Administrator Class shares, and includes the higher expenses applicable to the Administrator Class shares. If these expenses had not been included, returns for the Institutional Class shares would be higher.
4 Source: Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC. The Asset Allocation Blended Index is composed of 45% of the Russell 3000® Index, 35% of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and 20% of the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net). Prior to June 16, 2018, it was comprised of 65% of the MSCI ACWI Index (Net) and 35% of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. You cannot invest directly in an index.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.

6  |  Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Growth of $10,000 investment as of May 31, 20211
1 The chart compares the performance of Class A shares for the most recent ten years with the Asset Allocation Blended Index, Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net) and Russell 3000® Index. The chart assumes a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in Class A shares and reflects all operating expenses and assumes the maximum initial sales charge of 5.75%.
Footnotes continued from previous page
5 The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based benchmark that measures the investment-grade, U.S. dollar– denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage pass-throughs), asset-backed securities, and commercial mortgage-backed securities. You cannot invest directly in an index.
6 The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) All Country World Index (ACWI) ex USA Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed and emerging markets, excluding the United States. Source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indexes or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI. You cannot invest directly in an index.
7 The Russell 3000® Index measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization, which represents approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market. You cannot invest directly in an index.
Balanced funds may invest in stocks and bonds. Stock values fluctuate in response to the activities of individual companies and general market and economic conditions. Bond values fluctuate in response to the financial condition of individual issuers, general market and economic conditions, and changes in interest rates. Changes in market conditions and government policies may lead to periods of heightened volatility in the bond market and reduced liquidity for certain bonds held by the Fund. In general, when interest rates rise, bond values fall and investors may lose principal value. Interest rate changes and their impact on the Fund and its share price can be sudden and unpredictable. The use of derivatives may reduce returns and/or increase volatility. Foreign investments are especially volatile and can rise or fall dramatically due to differences in the political and economic conditions of the host country. Certain investment strategies tend to increase the total risk of an investment (relative to the broader market). The Fund is exposed to high-yield securities risk, mortgage- and asset-backed securities risk, geographic risk, and smaller-company securities risk. Consult the Fund’s prospectus for additional information on these and other risks.

Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund  |  7


Performance highlights (unaudited)
MANAGER'S DISCUSSION
Fund highlights
The Fund outperformed the Asset Allocation Fund Blended Index for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021.
The Tactical Asset Allocation (TAA) overlay and an overweight to credit sectors within the fixed-income portfolio were the largest contributors to relative performance over the period.
Poor relative performance within the international portfolio was the largest detractor from performance over the period.
Stock markets posted remarkable gains as the world recuperated from the pandemic.
The 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021, saw strong results from the broad U.S. equity markets, as illustrated by the Russell 3000® Index’s return of 43.91%. The broad foreign markets also did well, as reflected by the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net)'s return of 42.78%. The broad U.S. fixed-income market, as represented by the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, posted a slightly negative return of -0.40%. However, that result does not show the dichotomy within the fixed-income markets. Long-maturity U.S. Treasury bonds, as captured by the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index*, declined 13.85% as long-term Treasury yields rose over the period.
Ten largest holdings (%) as of May 31, 20211
Wells Fargo Managed Fixed Income Portfolio 21.51
Wells Fargo Disciplined U.S. Core Fund Class R6 13.68
Wells Fargo Large Company Value Portfolio 11.72
Wells Fargo Diversified Large Cap Growth Portfolio 10.91
Wells Fargo Disciplined International Developed Markets Portfolio 8.79
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio 6.02
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF 3.99
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio 3.52
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio 3.43
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio 3.29
1 Figures represent the percentage of the Fund's net assets. Holdings are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
In contrast, high-yield bonds, as shown by the ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index**, advanced 15.18% as credit spreads compressed over the period. Aided by unprecedented levels of monetary and fiscal stimulus, the economy staged an impressive recovery from the pandemic contraction and risky assets performed very well.
Portfolio management made few changes to the underlying portfolio.
A number of underlying managers are employed within the international equity sleeve of the portfolio, and over the course of the year, two were replaced due to performance considerations. While the rest of the portfolio remained stable, we implemented three tactical allocation adjustments over the year. From May 2020 to November 2020, we held a dedicated position in high-yield bonds, and from September 2020 to May 2021, we held a dedicated position in U.S. industrials sector stocks. In March 2021, we established a position in U.S. energy stocks, and that position was still in effect at the end of the period.
 

* The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index measures U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate, nominal debt issued by the U.S. Treasury with 20+ years to maturity. Treasury bills are excluded by the maturity constraint, but are part of a separate Short Treasury Index. STRIPS are excluded from the index because their inclusion would result in double-counting. You cannot invest directly in an index.
** The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index of domestic and Yankee high-yield bonds. The index tracks the performance of high-yield securities traded in the U.S. bond market. You cannot invest directly in an index. Copyright 2021. ICE Data Indices, LLC. All rights reserved.

8  |  Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund


Performance highlights (unaudited)
The Fund’s TAA overlay was active throughout the year. On the heels of the large pandemic-related equity market sell-off that occurred just prior to the start of the period, we established a number of positions that gave us exposure to risky assets. Over the entire period, TAA activity contributed about 120 basis points (bps; 100 bps equal 1.00%) to performance. At the start of the period, we held a long position in an S&P 500 futures contract along with a paired trade that returned the excess performance of the Nasdaq 100 over the S&P 500. We closed both of these trades in July 2020. In August 2020, we established a long position in a Nasdaq 100 contract and closed the trade in February 2021. In September 2020, we established a long position in U.S. industrials stocks and sold it in May 2021. In March 2021, we reestablished the long position in the S&P 500 futures contract and it was still in place at the end of the period. While the aforementioned trades contributed to performance, the trades listed below detracted from performance. At the start of the period, we held a short British pound position. We closed this trade in late July 2020. At the start of the period, we also held a paired trade long the S&P 500 futures contract and short the Russell 2000® futures contract. We closed this trade in August 2020. In July 2020, we established another paired trade that was long the S&P 500 futures contract and short the Nikkei futures contract. We closed this trade in November 2020.
Allocation (%) as of May 31, 2021
  Neutral
allocation
Effective
allocation1
Bonds 35 29
Stocks 65 68
Effective Cash 0 3
1 The effective allocation reflects the effect of the tactical futures overlay that may be in place. Effective cash, if any, represents the net offset to such future positions. Effective allocations are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
On a relative basis, the majority of the underlying sleeves did well over the period. The largest core bond manager within the Fund was overweight credit with respect to Treasury bonds. As Treasury bonds performed poorly over the period, this portfolio had the largest positive contribution to relative performance over the trailing 12 months. Our U.S. equity managers, particularly in the value and in the small-cap space, also added to performance on a relative basis. Managers in the international space had a slight detraction from relative performance.
Looking ahead, we are guardedly optimistic.
The massive amount of uncertainty we faced last year at this time has faded. While the daunting impacts of the virus, U.S. civil unrest, domestic politics, and geopolitical tensions are still very fresh in our mind’s eye, we increasingly see these issues in the rear-view mirror. The rollout of the vaccine, the reduction of political rhetoric, and a very accommodative Federal Reserve Board (Fed) have all helped calm fears. While COVID-19 cases are declining and America is returning to work, we are focused on understanding the economic impacts of the recent unprecedented monetary and fiscal policy effects on the portfolio. While we expect equity markets will continue to advance over the next 12 months, it may be at a much slower pace than over the past 12 months. We believe there are new risks around the corner. We are very concerned about future inflation and are not fully convinced it is transitory in nature. The U.S. Treasury is issuing a large quantity of bonds, the Fed is purchasing a large quantity of bonds, and we continue to monitor closely the duration and credit composition of our fixed-income investments. There are many unknowns, and despite some optimism, we continue to monitor the situation very carefully.
 

Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund  |  9


Fund expenses (unaudited)
As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and contingent deferred sales charges (if any) on redemptions and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) and/or shareholder servicing fees, and other Fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period from December 1, 2020 to May 31, 2021.
Actual expenses
The “Actual” line of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the “Actual” line under the heading entitled “Expenses paid during period” for your applicable class of shares to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes
The “Hypothetical” line of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) and contingent deferred sales charges. Therefore, the “Hypothetical” line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
  Beginning
account value
12-1-2020
Ending
account value
5-31-2021
Expenses
paid during
the period1,2
Annualized net
expense ratio2
Class A        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,123.90 $5.45 1.03%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,019.80 $5.19 1.03%
Class C        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,111.62 $9.37 1.78%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,016.06 $8.95 1.78%
Class R        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,119.79 $6.66 1.26%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,018.65 $6.34 1.26%
Administrator Class        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,123.91 $4.61 0.87%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,020.59 $4.38 0.87%
Institutional Class        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,124.91 $3.71 0.70%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,021.44 $3.53 0.70%
1 Expenses paid is equal to the annualized net expense ratio of each class multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one-half-year period).
2 Amounts reflect net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios in which the Fund invests.

10  |  Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Investment companies:  98.07%          
Affiliated master portfolios:  75.34%          
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio                  $    66,470,173
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio                    113,890,326
Wells Fargo Disciplined International Developed Markets Portfolio                    166,248,547
Wells Fargo Diversified Large Cap Growth Portfolio                    206,242,673
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Porfolio                     19,076,862
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio                     24,217,903
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio                     62,106,544
Wells Fargo Large Company Value Portfolio                    221,492,243
Wells Fargo Managed Fixed Income Portfolio                    406,745,440
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio                     64,752,153
Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio                     21,061,071
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio                     52,076,671
          1,424,380,606
Exchange-traded funds:  6.50%          
Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund          339,231    17,711,251
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF          982,636    75,466,445
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF          258,825    29,648,404
            122,826,100
Stock funds:  16.23%          
Wells Fargo Disciplined U.S. Core Fund Class R6       11,504,836   258,513,675
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6          664,987    23,640,299
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund Class R6        1,829,012    24,636,790
          306,790,764
Total Investment companies (Cost $1,542,531,511)         1,853,997,470
Total investments in securities (Cost $1,542,531,511) 98.07%       1,853,997,470
Other assets and liabilities, net 1.93       36,551,037
Total net assets 100.00%       $1,890,548,507
    
The issuer is an affiliate of the Fund as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund  |  11


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

Investments in affiliates
An affiliated investment is an investment in which the Fund owns at least 5% of the outstanding voting shares of the issuer or as a result of other relationships, such as the Fund and the issuer having the same investment manager. Transactions with issuers that were either affiliates of the Fund at the beginning of the period or the end of the period were as follows:
  Value,
beginning of
period
Purchases Sales
proceeds
Net
realized
gains
(losses) on
affiliated
Underlying
Funds
  Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses) on
affiliated
Underlying
Funds
  Value,
end of
period
  % of
net
assets
Investment companies                    
Stock funds                    
Wells Fargo Disciplined U.S. Core Fund Class R6 $178,014,521 $82,278,663 $(52,557,602) $ 5,775,460   $ 45,002,633   $ 258,513,675    
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6 22,128,708 134,391 (7,966,503) 2,224,040   7,119,663   23,640,299    
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund Class R6 21,561,691 655,510 (6,548,511) 807,088   8,161,012   24,636,790    
        $8,806,588   $60,283,308   $306,790,764   16.23%
    
  Shares,
end of
period
Dividends from
affiliated
Underlying Funds
  Net realized gains
on capital gain
distributions
from affiliated
Underlying Funds
Investment companies        
Stock funds        
Wells Fargo Disciplined U.S. Core Fund Class R6 11,504,836 $ 4,538,731   $ 14,598,207
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6 664,987 102,921   0
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund Class R6 1,829,012 624,039   0
    $5,265,691   $14,598,207
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

12  |  Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

Transactions with the affiliated Master Portfolios were as follows:
  % of
ownership,
beginning
of period
% of
ownership,
end of
period
Net realized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Interest
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Dividends
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Affiliated
income
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Value,
end of
period
  % of
net
assets
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio 17.52% 16.16% $ 5,350,064   $ 19,485,242   $ 0   $ 990,661   $ 1,049   $ 66,470,173    
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio 1.57 2.02 2,267,027   (3,246,752)   1,649,804   0   3,021   113,890,326    
Wells Fargo Disciplined International Developed Markets Portfolio 81.81 81.24 34,470,971   14,583,340   0   4,258,339   50,393   166,248,547    
Wells Fargo Diversified Large Cap Growth Portfolio 70.75 72.28 20,121,819   31,583,204   0   1,292,271   6,569   206,242,673    
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Porfolio 2.63 1.99 4,449,707   4,592,916   0   24,594   6,068   19,076,862    
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio 11.03 13.38 2,609,240   4,836,836   0   600,376   544   24,217,903    
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio 0.00 8.72 4,923,967   10,181,387   0   1,538,427   517   62,106,544    
Wells Fargo High Yield Corporate Bond Portfolio 59.90 0.00 3,417,429   1,817,797   2,794,485   0   71   0    
Wells Fargo International Value Portfolio 20.82 0.00 (5,805,478)   43,033,907   0   3,320,387   30,309   0    
Wells Fargo Large Company Value Portfolio 76.13 76.48 78,658,248   (4,328,152)   0   3,602,205   1,219   221,492,243    
Wells Fargo Managed Fixed Income Portfolio 82.04 81.98 5,945,497   (5,977,261)   10,924,833   0   10,657   406,745,440    
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio 35.61 27.05 765,864   3,277,810   1,572,925   189,612   638   64,752,153    
Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio 1.38 1.53 5,662,953   3,413,115   0   90,047   1,872   21,061,071    
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio 11.31 8.40 5,940,252   23,415,653   0   721,757   4,776   52,076,671    
      $168,777,560   $146,669,042   $16,942,047   $16,628,676   $117,703   $1,424,380,606   75.34%
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund  |  13


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

Futures contracts
Description Number of
contracts
Expiration
date
Notional
cost
Notional
value
Unrealized
gains
  Unrealized
losses
Long              
Bloomberg Commodity Index 2,475 6-16-2021 $ 22,604,002 $ 22,943,250 $ 339,248   $ 0
E-Mini S&P 500 Index 236 6-18-2021 49,804,954 49,588,320 0   (216,634)
FTSE 100 Index 283 6-18-2021 28,190,435 28,238,565 48,130   0
IBEX 35 Index 780 6-18-2021 86,949,898 87,125,985 176,087   0
MSCI Emerging Markets Index 284 6-18-2021 18,953,495 19,324,780 371,285   0
Short              
Australian Dollars Futures (728) 6-14-2021 (56,240,737) (56,157,920) 82,817   0
Mini-DAX Futures (903) 6-18-2021 (80,293,050) (85,103,257) 0   (4,810,207)
10-Year U.S. Treasury Notes (694) 9-21-2021 (91,291,925) (91,564,625) 0   (272,700)
          $1,017,567   $(5,299,541)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

14  |  Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund


Statement of assets and liabilities—May 31, 2021
   
Assets  
Investments in affiliated Master Portfolios, at value (cost $1,179,244,564)

$ 1,424,380,606
Investments in unaffiliated Underlying Funds, at value (cost $121,795,771)

122,826,100
Investments in affiliated Underlying Funds, at value (cost $241,491,176)

306,790,764
Cash

534,573
Cash at broker segregated for futures contracts

38,241,102
Receivable for investments sold

65,427
Receivable for Fund shares sold

32,790
Total assets

1,892,871,362
Liabilities  
Payable for Fund shares redeemed

899,162
Shareholder servicing fees payable

343,347
Administration fees payable

316,165
Management fee payable

298,813
Shareholder report expenses payable

192,862
Payable for daily variation margin on open futures contracts

115,850
Distribution fees payable

34,219
Trustees’ fees and expenses payable

1,626
Accrued expenses and other liabilities

120,811
Total liabilities

2,322,855
Total net assets

$1,890,548,507
Net assets consist of  
Paid-in capital

$ 1,416,132,790
Total distributable earnings

474,415,717
Total net assets

$1,890,548,507
Computation of net asset value and offering price per share  
Net assets – Class A

$ 1,542,706,944
Shares outstanding – Class A1

91,297,393
Net asset value per share – Class A

$16.90
Maximum offering price per share – Class A2

$17.93
Net assets – Class C

$ 52,586,422
Shares outstanding – Class C1

3,167,370
Net asset value per share – Class C

$16.60
Net assets – Class R

$ 3,407,461
Shares outstanding – Class R1

202,148
Net asset value per share – Class R

$16.86
Net assets – Administrator Class

$ 25,026,076
Shares outstanding – Administrator Class1

1,450,597
Net asset value per share – Administrator Class

$17.25
Net assets – Institutional Class

$ 266,821,604
Shares outstanding – Institutional Class1

15,749,927
Net asset value per share – Institutional Class

$16.94
1 The Fund has an unlimited number of authorized shares.
2 Maximum offering price is computed as 100/94.25 of net asset value. On investments of $50,000 or more, the offering price is reduced.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund  |  15


Statement of operations—year ended May 31, 2021
   
Investment income  
Interest allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios (net of foreign withholding taxes of $1,093)

$ 16,942,047
Dividends allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios (net of foreign withholding taxes of $1,100,930)

16,628,676
Dividends from affiliated Underlying Funds

5,265,691
Dividends from unaffiliated Underlying Funds

1,076,788
Affiliated income allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

117,703
Expenses allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

(7,526,402)
Waivers allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

743,170
Total investment income

33,247,673
Expenses  
Management fee

4,958,866
Administration fees  
Class A

3,019,831
Class C

160,933
Class R

7,989
Administrator Class

30,137
Institutional Class

325,306
Shareholder servicing fees  
Class A

3,592,173
Class C

190,761
Class R

9,201
Administrator Class

57,398
Distribution fees  
Class C

570,954
Class R

9,079
Custody and accounting fees

69,521
Professional fees

60,955
Registration fees

112,971
Shareholder report expenses

91,059
Trustees’ fees and expenses

19,430
Other fees and expenses

71,808
Total expenses

13,358,372
Less: Fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements  
Fund-level

(1,754,490)
Class A

(2,716)
Class C

(93)
Administrator Class

(20,864)
Net expenses

11,580,209
Net investment income

21,667,464
Payment from affiliate

712,806
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments  
Net realized gains on  
Securities transactions allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

168,777,560
Affiliated Underlying Funds

8,806,588
Unaffiliated Underlying Funds

17,502,381
Futures contracts

34,139,678
Capital gain distributions from affiliated Underlying Funds

14,598,207
Net realized gains on investments

243,824,414
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on  
Securities transactions allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

146,669,042
Affiliated Underlying Funds

60,283,308
Unaffiliated Underlying Funds

1,030,329
Futures contracts

(15,055,292)
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

192,927,387
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

436,751,801
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

$459,132,071
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

16  |  Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund


Statement of changes in net assets
   
  Year ended
May 31, 2021
Year ended
May 31, 20201
Year ended
April 30, 2020
Operations            
Net investment income

  $ 21,667,464   $ 1,669,038   $ 28,719,641
Payment from affiliate

  712,806   0   0
Net realized gains on investments

  243,824,414   1,279,058   2,140,519
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

  192,927,387   53,264,308   (50,067,897)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations

  459,132,071   56,212,404   (19,207,737)
Distributions to shareholders from            
Net investment income and net realized gains            
Class A

  (55,986,187)   0   (21,696,851)
Class C

  (700,025)   0   (1,880,323)
Class R

  (109,599)   0   (65,870)
Administrator Class

  (921,907)   0   (445,651)
Institutional Class

  (10,355,792)   0   (5,062,752)
Total distributions to shareholders

  (68,073,510)   0   (29,151,447)
Capital share transactions Shares   Shares   Shares  
Proceeds from shares sold            
Class A

6,250,034 93,969,141 370,617 4,834,007 6,471,393 88,539,900
Class C

279,606 4,416,662 21,252 268,156 352,682 4,601,983
Class R

30,203 464,911 5,366 70,207 76,686 1,045,391
Administrator Class

127,077 2,046,652 2,868 37,874 82,695 1,128,405
Institutional Class

1,785,909 27,785,977 117,750 1,544,789 2,340,394 31,989,185
    128,683,343   6,755,033   127,304,864
Reinvestment of distributions            
Class A

3,223,356 50,235,396 0 0 1,392,639 19,726,126
Class C

45,235 683,050 0 0 109,235 1,477,961
Class R

6,360 98,865 0 0 3,939 55,022
Administrator Class

53,449 850,269 0 0 27,855 400,275
Institutional Class

504,693 7,879,021 0 0 271,898 3,868,327
    59,746,601   0   25,527,711
Payment for shares redeemed            
Class A

(13,048,794) (200,591,180) (1,082,884) (14,222,900) (21,422,317) (290,340,362)
Class C

(6,233,258) (89,970,179) (487,279) (6,097,311) (9,169,334) (119,930,791)
Class R

(155,015) (2,300,175) (152) (1,986) (335,021) (4,480,311)
Administrator Class

(302,421) (4,691,747) (34,639) (464,546) (820,004) (11,202,765)
Institutional Class

(3,567,623) (54,922,613) (404,103) (5,323,366) (8,379,750) (112,607,902)
    (352,475,894)   (26,110,109)   (538,562,131)
Net decrease in net assets resulting from capital share transactions

  (164,045,950)   (19,355,076)   (385,729,556)
Total increase (decrease) in net assets

  227,012,611   36,857,328   (434,088,740)
Net assets            
Beginning of period

  1,663,535,896   1,626,678,568   2,060,767,308
End of period

  $1,890,548,507   $1,663,535,896   $1,626,678,568
1 For the one month ended May 31, 2020. The Fund changed its fiscal year end from April 30 to May 31, effective May 31, 2020.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund  |  17


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31   Year ended April 30
Class A 2021 2020 1   2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$13.57 $13.12   $13.49 $14.33 $13.62 $12.71
Net investment income (loss)

0.18 2 0.02   0.21 2 0.15 2 (0.12) (0.09)
Payment from affiliate

0.00 3 0.00   0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

3.75 0.43   (0.36) 0.04 1.08 1.20
Total from investment operations

3.93 0.45   (0.15) 0.19 0.96 1.11
Distributions to shareholders from              
Net investment income

(0.41) 0.00   (0.06) (0.06) (0.25) (0.20)
Net realized gains

(0.19) 0.00   (0.16) (0.97) 0.00 0.00
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.60) 0.00   (0.22) (1.03) (0.25) (0.20)
Net asset value, end of period

$16.90 $13.57   $13.12 $13.49 $14.33 $13.62
Total return4

29.45% 5 3.43%   (1.26)% 1.96% 7.01% 8.86%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)              
Gross expenses

1.14% * 1.21% *   1.22% * 1.18% *,6 0.82% 6 0.80% 6
Net expenses

1.04% * 1.05% *   1.05% * 1.04% *,6 0.82% 6 0.80% 6
Net investment income (loss)

1.19% * 1.22% *   1.54% * 1.08% *,6 (0.82)% 6 (0.80)% 6
Supplemental data              
Portfolio turnover rate

137% 7 13% 7   109% 7 189% 7 0% 8 0% 8
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$1,542,707 $1,287,856   $1,253,699 $1,472,484 $1,348,107 $1,413,776
    
* Ratios include only the net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios and do not include expenses from any other affiliated Underlying Funds. Net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios included in the ratios were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.38%
Year ended May 31, 20201 0.45%
Year ended April 30, 2020 0.45%
Year ended April 30, 2019 0.40%
    
1 For the one month ended May 31, 2020. The Fund changed its fiscal year end from April 30 to May 31, effective May 31, 2020.
2 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
3 Amount is less than $0.005.
4 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges. Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.
5 For year ended May 31, 2021, the Fund received a payment from an affiliate that had an impact of less than 0.005% on total return. See Note 4 in the Notes to Financial Statements for additional information.
6 Ratios did not include any expenses from Asset Allocation Trust or its investments in underlying funds. Asset Allocation Trust did not have any net expenses.
7 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the Fund’s ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. These purchases and sales amounts are aggregated with the direct purchases and sales in the affiliated Underlying Funds and unaffiliated securities and included in the portfolio turnover calculation.
8 Portfolio turnover rate represents the purchase and sales of the Fund’s investment in Asset Allocation Trust and not the underlying investment transactions of Asset Allocation Trust.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

18  |  Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31   Year ended April 30
Class C 2021 2020 1   2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$13.01 $12.58   $12.99 $13.87 $13.17 $12.28
Net investment income (loss)

0.06 2 0.01 2   0.11 2 0.03 2 (0.22) 2 (0.19) 2
Payment from affiliate

0.17 0.00   0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

3.54 0.42   (0.36) 0.06 1.03 1.18
Total from investment operations

3.77 0.43   (0.25) 0.09 0.81 0.99
Distributions to shareholders from              
Net investment income

0.00 0.00   0.00 0.00 (0.11) (0.10)
Net realized gains

(0.18) 0.00   (0.16) (0.97) 0.00 0.00
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.18) 0.00   (0.16) (0.97) (0.11) (0.10)
Net asset value, end of period

$16.60 $13.01   $12.58 $12.99 $13.87 $13.17
Total return3

29.19% 4 3.42%   (2.02)% 1.21% 6.16% 8.08%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)              
Gross expenses

1.89% * 1.96% *   1.97% * 1.92% *,5 1.57% 5 1.55% 5
Net expenses

1.79% * 1.79% *   1.80% * 1.78% *,5 1.57% 5 1.55% 5
Net investment income (loss)

0.43% * 0.47% *   0.82% * 0.23% *,5 (1.57)% 5 (1.55)% 5
Supplemental data              
Portfolio turnover rate

137% 6 13% 6   109% 6 189% 6 0% 7 0% 7
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$52,586 $118,081   $120,029 $237,096 $905,336 $1,232,098
    
* Ratios include only the net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios and do not include expenses from any other affiliated Underlying Funds. Net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios included in the ratios were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.39%
Year ended May 31, 20201 0.44%
Year ended April 30, 2020 0.45%
Year ended April 30, 2019 0.38%
    
1 For the one month ended May 31, 2020. The Fund changed its fiscal year end from April 30 to May 31, effective May 31, 2020.
2 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
3 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges. Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.
4 For year ended May 31, 2021, the Fund received a payment from an affiliate which had a 1.29% impact on the total return. See Note 4 in the Notes to Financial Statements for additional information.
5 Ratios did not include any expenses from Asset Allocation Trust or its investments in underlying funds. Asset Allocation Trust did not have any net expenses.
6 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the Fund’s ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. These purchases and sales amounts are aggregated with the direct purchases and sales in the affiliated Underlying Funds and unaffiliated securities and included in the portfolio turnover calculation.
7 Portfolio turnover rate represents the purchase and sales of the Fund’s investment in Asset Allocation Trust and not the underlying investment transactions of Asset Allocation Trust.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund  |  19


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31   Year ended April 30
Class R 2021 2020 1   2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$13.47 $13.02   $13.37 $14.20 $13.49 $12.58
Net investment income (loss)

0.14 2 0.01 2   0.18 2 0.11 2 (0.15) 2 (0.13) 2
Payment from affiliate

0.07 0.00   0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

3.71 0.44   (0.37) 0.05 1.05 1.21
Total from investment operations

3.92 0.45   0.19 0.16 0.90 1.08
Distributions to shareholders from              
Net investment income

(0.34) 0.00   0.00 (0.02) (0.19) (0.17)
Net realized gains

(0.19) 0.00   (0.16) (0.97) 0.00 0.00
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.53) 0.00   (0.16) (0.99) (0.19) (0.17)
Net asset value, end of period

$16.86 $13.47   $13.02 $13.37 $14.20 $13.49
Total return3

29.44% 4 3.46%   (1.51)% 1.73% 6.70% 8.64%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)              
Gross expenses

1.37% * 1.44% *   1.47% * 1.42% *,5 1.06% 5 1.05% 5
Net expenses

1.28% * 1.27% *   1.30% * 1.29% *,5 1.06% 5 1.05% 5
Net investment income (loss)

0.95% * 0.99% *   1.32% * 0.77% *,5 (1.06)% 5 (1.05)% 5
Supplemental data              
Portfolio turnover rate

137% 6 13% 6   109% 6 189% 6 0% 7 0% 7
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$3,407 $4,318   $4,106 $7,619 $15,658 $20,244
    
* Ratios include only the net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios and do not include expenses from any other affiliated Underlying Funds. Net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios included in the ratios were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.38%
Year ended May 31, 20201 0.45%
Year ended April 30, 2020 0.45%
Year ended April 30, 2019 0.39%
    
1 For the one month ended May 31, 2020. The Fund changed its fiscal year end from April 30 to May 31, effective May 31, 2020.
2 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
3 Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.
4 For year ended May 31, 2021, the Fund received a payment from an affiliate which had a 0.51% impact on the total return. See Note 4 in the Notes to Financial Statements for additional information.
5 Ratios did not include any expenses from Asset Allocation Trust or its investments in underlying funds. Asset Allocation Trust did not have any net expenses.
6 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the Fund’s ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. These purchases and sales amounts are aggregated with the direct purchases and sales in the affiliated Underlying Funds and unaffiliated securities and included in the portfolio turnover calculation.
7 Portfolio turnover rate represents the purchase and sales of the Fund’s investment in Asset Allocation Trust and not the underlying investment transactions of Asset Allocation Trust.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

20  |  Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31   Year ended April 30
Administrator Class 2021 2020 1   2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$13.75 $13.29   $13.66 $14.49 $13.78 $12.84
Net investment income (loss)

0.21 2 0.02 2   0.24 2 0.16 2 (0.09) 2 (0.08) 2
Payment from affiliate

0.12 0.00   0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

3.81 0.44   (0.37) 0.06 1.07 1.24
Total from investment operations

4.14 0.46   (0.13) 0.22 0.98 1.16
Distributions to shareholders from              
Net investment income

(0.45) 0.00   (0.08) (0.08) (0.27) (0.22)
Net realized gains

(0.19) 0.00   (0.16) (0.97) 0.00 0.00
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.64) 0.00   (0.24) (1.05) (0.27) (0.22)
Net asset value, end of period

$17.25 $13.75   $13.29 $13.66 $14.49 $13.78
Total return3

30.62% 4 3.46%   (1.08)% 2.18% 7.10% 9.14%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)              
Gross expenses

1.06% * 1.13% *   1.14% * 1.08% *,5 0.73% 5 0.72% 5
Net expenses

0.87% * 0.86% *   0.86% * 0.86% *,5 0.64% 5 0.64% 5
Net investment income (loss)

1.36% * 1.40% *   1.74% * 1.17% *,5 (0.64)% 5 (0.64)% 5
Supplemental data              
Portfolio turnover rate

137% 6 13% 6   109% 6 189% 6 0% 7 0% 7
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$25,026 $21,628   $21,316 $31,610 $69,607 $92,600
    
* Ratios include only the net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios and do not include expenses from any other affiliated Underlying Funds. Net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios included in the ratios were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.38%
Year ended May 31, 20201 0.45%
Year ended April 30, 2020 0.44%
Year ended April 30, 2019 0.38%
    
1 For the one month ended May 31, 2020. The Fund changed its fiscal year end from April 30 to May 31, effective May 31, 2020.
2 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
3 Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.
4 For year ended May 31, 2021, the Fund received a payment from an affiliate which had a 0.90% impact on the total return. See Note 4 in the Notes to Financial Statements for additional information.
5 Ratios did not include any expenses from Asset Allocation Trust or its investments in underlying funds. Asset Allocation Trust did not have any net expenses.
6 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the Fund’s ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. These purchases and sales amounts are aggregated with the direct purchases and sales in the affiliated Underlying Funds and unaffiliated securities and included in the portfolio turnover calculation.
7 Portfolio turnover rate represents the purchase and sales of the Fund’s investment in Asset Allocation Trust and not the underlying investment transactions of Asset Allocation Trust.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund  |  21


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31   Year ended April 30
Institutional Class 2021 2020 1   2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$13.61 $13.14   $13.52 $14.36 $13.66 $12.74
Net investment income (loss)

0.24 0.02 2   0.26 2 0.19 2 (0.06) 2 (0.06) 2
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

3.74 0.45   (0.38) 0.05 1.06 1.23
Total from investment operations

3.98 0.47   (0.12) 0.24 1.00 1.17
Distributions to shareholders from              
Net investment income

(0.46) 0.00   (0.10) (0.11) (0.30) (0.25)
Net realized gains

(0.19) 0.00   (0.16) (0.97) 0.00 0.00
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.65) 0.00   (0.26) (1.08) (0.30) (0.25)
Net asset value, end of period

$16.94 $13.61   $13.14 $13.52 $14.36 $13.66
Total return3

29.76% 3.58%   (1.01)% 2.39% 7.33% 9.34%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)              
Gross expenses

0.81% * 0.88% *   0.89% * 0.84% *,4 0.49% 4 0.47% 4
Net expenses

0.71% * 0.72% *   0.72% * 0.69% *,4 0.44% 4 0.44% 4
Net investment income (loss)

1.52% * 1.55% *   1.88% * 1.34% *,4 (0.44)% 4 (0.44)% 4
Supplemental data              
Portfolio turnover rate

137% 5 13% 5   109% 5 189% 6 0% 6 0% 6
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$266,822 $231,652   $227,529 $311,958 $572,803 $672,544
    
* Ratios include only the net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios and do not include expenses from any other affiliated Underlying Funds. Net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios included in the ratios were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.38%
Year ended May 31, 20201 0.45%
Year ended April 30, 2020 0.45%
Year ended April 30, 2019 0.38%
    
1 For the one month ended May 31, 2020. The Fund changed its fiscal year end from April 30 to May 31, effective May 31, 2020.
2 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
3 Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.
4 Ratios did not include any expenses from Asset Allocation Trust or its investments in underlying funds. Asset Allocation Trust did not have any net expenses.
5 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the Fund’s ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. These purchases and sales amounts are aggregated with the direct purchases and sales in the affiliated Underlying Funds and unaffiliated securities and included in the portfolio turnover calculation.
6 Portfolio turnover rate represents the purchase and sales of the Fund’s investment in Asset Allocation Trust and not the underlying investment transactions of Asset Allocation Trust.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

22  |  Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund


Notes to financial statements
1. ORGANIZATION
Wells Fargo Funds Trust (the "Trust"), a Delaware statutory trust organized on March 10, 1999, is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). As an investment company, the Trust follows the accounting and reporting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, Financial Services – Investment Companies. These financial statements report on the Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund (the "Fund") which is a diversified series of the Trust.
The Fund is a fund-of-funds that invests in various affiliated mutual funds (“Underlying Funds”) employing a multi-asset, multi-style investment approach designed to reduce the price and return volatility of the Fund and to provide more consistent returns. The Fund may also invest directly in securities. The Underlying Funds incur separate expenses in seeking to achieve their investment objectives. Investments in affiliated Underlying Funds may also include investments in one or more separate diversified portfolios (collectively, the “affiliated Master Portfolios”) of Wells Fargo Master Trust, a registered open-end management investment company. Each affiliated Master Portfolio directly acquires portfolio securities and the Fund acquires an indirect interest in those securities. The Fund accounts for its investments in the affiliated Master Portfolios as partnership investments and records on a daily basis its share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s income, expense and realized and unrealized gains and losses. The financial statements of the affiliated Master Portfolios are presented in separate financial statements and may be obtained free of charge by contacting Investor Services or by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov. The financial statements of the affiliated Master Portfolios are filed with the SEC under Wells Fargo Master Trust. The financial statements for all other affiliated Underlying Funds are also publicly available on the SEC website at sec.gov.
On February 23, 2021, Wells Fargo & Company announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management ("WFAM") to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. WFAM is the trade name used by the asset management businesses of Wells Fargo & Company and includes Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the investment manager to the Fund, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, both registered investment advisers providing sub-advisory services to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Fund's principal underwriter. As part of the transaction, Wells Fargo & Company will own a 9.9% equity interest and will continue to serve as an important client and distribution partner.
Consummation of the transaction will result in the automatic termination of the Fund's investment management agreement and subadvisory agreement. The Fund's Board of Trustees approved a new investment management and new subadvisory agreement and approved submitting the agreements to the Fund’s shareholders for approval at a special meeting of shareholders expected to be held on August 16, 2021. Shareholders of record of the Fund at the close of business on May 28, 2021 are entitled to vote at the meeting. If shareholders approve the new agreements, they would take effect upon the closing of the transaction. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
This shareholder report is not asking you for a proxy. A separate proxy statement with more detailed information about the transaction will be provided to Fund shareholders and should be reviewed carefully.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following significant accounting policies, which are consistently followed in the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund, are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Securities valuation
All investments are valued each business day as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4 p.m. Eastern Time), although the Fund may deviate from this calculation time under unusual or unexpected circumstances.
Investments in the affiliated Master Portfolios are valued daily based on each Fund’s proportionate share of each affiliated Master Portfolio’s net assets, which are also valued daily.
Equity securities and futures contracts that are listed on a foreign or domestic exchange or market are valued at the official closing price or, if none, the last sales price. If no sale occurs on the principal exchange or market that day, a fair value price will be determined in accordance with the Fund’s Valuation Procedures.
Investments in underlying mutual funds are valued at net asset per share as reported by the Underlying Funds as of the close of the regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange on each day the exchange is open for trading.

Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund  |  23


Notes to financial statements
Investments which are not valued using any of the methods discussed above are valued at their fair value, as determined in good faith by the Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees has established a Valuation Committee comprised of the Trustees and has delegated to it the authority to take any actions regarding the valuation of portfolio securities that the Valuation Committee deems necessary or appropriate, including determining the fair value of portfolio securities, unless the determination has been delegated to the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee at Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC ("Funds Management"). The Board of Trustees retains the authority to make or ratify any valuation decisions or approve any changes to the Valuation Procedures as it deems appropriate. On a quarterly basis, the Board of Trustees receives reports on any valuation actions taken by the Valuation Committee or the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee which may include items for ratification.
Futures contracts
Futures contracts are agreements between the Fund and a counterparty to buy or sell a specific amount of a commodity, financial instrument or currency at a specified price on a specified date. The Fund may buy and sell futures contracts in order to gain exposure to, or protect against, changes in interest rates, security values and foreign exchange rates and is subject to interest rate risk, equity price risk and foreign currency risk. The primary risks associated with the use of futures contracts are the imperfect correlation between changes in market values of securities held by the Fund and the prices of futures contracts, and the possibility of an illiquid market. Futures contracts are generally entered into on a regulated futures exchange and cleared through a clearinghouse associated with the exchange. With futures contracts, there is minimal counterparty risk to the Fund since futures contracts are exchange traded and the exchange’s clearinghouse, as the counterparty to all exchange traded futures, guarantees the futures contracts against default.
Upon entering into a futures contract, the Fund is required to deposit either cash or securities (initial margin) with the broker in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the contract value. Subsequent payments (variation margin) are paid to or from the broker each day equal to the daily changes in the contract value. Such payments are recorded as unrealized gains or losses and, if any, shown as variation margin receivable (payable) in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Should the Fund fail to make requested variation margin payments, the broker can gain access to the initial margin to satisfy the Fund’s payment obligations. When the contracts are closed, a realized gain or loss is recorded in the Statement of Operations.
Investment transactions, income and expenses
Investments in the affiliated Master Portfolios are recorded on a trade date basis. The Fund records daily its proportionate share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s income, expenses and realized and unrealized gains or losses. The Fund also accrues its own expenses.
Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains or losses are recorded on the basis of identified cost.
Income dividends and capital gain distributions from investment companies are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Capital gain distributions from investment companies are treated as realized gains.
Distributions to shareholders
Distributions to shareholders from net investment income and any net realized gains are recorded on the ex-dividend date and paid at least annually. Such distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations and may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Dividend sources are estimated at the time of declaration. The tax character of distributions is determined as of the Fund's fiscal year end. Therefore, a portion of the Fund's distributions made prior to the Fund’s fiscal year end may be categorized as a tax return of capital at year end.
Federal and other taxes
The Fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by distributing substantially all of its investment company taxable income and any net realized capital gains (after reduction for capital loss carryforwards) sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes. Accordingly, no provision for federal income taxes was required.
The Fund’s income and federal excise tax returns and all financial records supporting those returns for the prior three fiscal years are subject to examination by the federal and Delaware revenue authorities. Management has analyzed the Fund's tax positions taken on federal, state, and foreign tax returns for all open tax years and does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability.

24  |  Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund


Notes to financial statements
As of May 31, 2021, the aggregate cost of all investments for federal income tax purposes was $1,548,002,596 and the unrealized gains (losses) consisted of:
Gross unrealized gains $302,123,336
Gross unrealized losses (410,436)
Net unrealized gains $301,712,900
Reclassifications are made to the Fund’s capital accounts for permanent tax differences to reflect income and gains available for distribution (or available capital loss carryforwards) under federal income tax regulations. U.S. generally accepted accounting principles require that certain components of net assets be adjusted to reflect permanent differences between financial and tax reporting. These reclassifications have no effect on net assets or net asset values per share. The primary permanent difference causing such reclassification is due to recognition of partnership income. At May 31, 2021, as a result of permanent book-to-tax differences, the following reclassification adjustments were made on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities:
Paid-in capital Total distributable earnings
$(6,814,918) $6,814,918
Class allocations
The separate classes of shares offered by the Fund differ principally in applicable sales charges, distribution, shareholder servicing, and administration fees. Class specific expenses are charged directly to that share class. Investment income, common fund-level expenses, and realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative proportion of net assets of each class.
3. FAIR VALUATION MEASUREMENTS
Fair value measurements of investments are determined within a framework that has established a fair value hierarchy based upon the various data inputs utilized in determining the value of the Fund’s investments. The three-level hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The Fund’s investments are classified within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The inputs are summarized into three broad levels as follows:
Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical securities
Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs or methodologies used for valuing investments in securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.

Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund  |  25


Notes to financial statements
The following is a summary of the inputs used in valuing the Fund’s assets and liabilities as of May 31, 2021:
  Quoted prices
(Level 1)
Other significant
observable inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
unobservable inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Assets        
Investments in:        
Investment companies $ 429,616,864 $0 $0 $ 429,616,864
Investments measured at net asset value*       1,424,380,606
  429,616,864 0 0 1,853,997,470
Futures contracts 1,017,567 0 0 1,017,567
Total assets $430,634,431 $0 $0 $1,855,015,037
Liabilities        
Futures contracts $ 5,299,541 $0 $0 $ 5,299,541
Total liabilities $ 5,299,541 $0 $0 $ 5,299,541
    
* Investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amount presented in the table is intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The Fund’s investments in the affiliated Master Portfolios are valued at $1,424,380,606. Each affiliated Master Portfolio does not have a redemption period notice, can be redeemed daily and does not have any unfunded commitments.
Futures contracts are reported at their cumulative unrealized gains (losses) at measurement date as reported in the table following the Portfolio of Investments. For futures contracts, the current day’s variation margin is reported on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. All other assets and liabilities are reported at their market value at measurement date.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the Fund did not have any transfers into/out of Level 3.
The investment objective of each affiliated Master Portfolio is as follows:
Affiliated Master Portfolio Investment objective
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio Seeks maximum long-term total return (current income and capital appreciation), consistent with minimizing risk to principal
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio Seeks total return, consisting of income and capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Disciplined International Developed Markets Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Diversified Large Cap Growth Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Large Company Value Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Managed Fixed Income Portfolio Seeks consistent fixed-income returns
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio Seeks returns that exceed the rate of inflation over the long-term
Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
4. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
Management fee
Funds Management, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company ("Wells Fargo"), is the manager of the Fund and provides advisory and fund-level administrative services under an investment management agreement. Under the investment management agreement, Funds Management is responsible for, among other services, implementing the

26  |  Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund


Notes to financial statements
investment objectives and strategies of the Fund, supervising the subadviser and providing fund-level administrative services in connection with the Fund’s operations. As compensation for its services under the investment management agreement, Funds Management is entitled to receive a management fee at the following annual rate based on the Fund’s average daily net assets:
Average daily net assets Management fee
First $500 million 0.300%
Next $500 million 0.280
Next $2 billion 0.260
Next $2 billion 0.240
Next $5 billion 0.230
Over $10 billion 0.220
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the management fee was equivalent to an annual rate of 0.28% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
Funds Management has retained the services of a subadviser to provide daily portfolio management to the Fund. The fee for subadvisory services is borne by Funds Management. Wells Capital Management Incorporated, an affiliate of Funds Management and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo, is the subadviser to the Fund and is entitled to receive a fee from Funds Management at an annual rate starting at 0.10% and declining to 0.05% as the average daily net assets of the Fund increase.
Funds Management also serves as the adviser to each affiliated Master Portfolio and is entitled to receive a fee from each affiliated Master Portfolio for those services.
Administration fees
Under a class-level administration agreement, Funds Management provides class-level administrative services to the Fund, which includes paying fees and expenses for services provided by the transfer agent, sub-transfer agents, omnibus account servicers and record-keepers. As compensation for its services under the class-level administration agreement, Funds Management receives an annual fee which is calculated based on the average daily net assets of each class as follows:
  Class-level
administration fee
Class A 0.21%
Class C 0.21
Class R 0.21
Administrator Class 0.13
Institutional Class 0.13
Waivers and/or expense reimbursements
Funds Management has contractually waived and/or reimbursed management and administration fees to the extent necessary to maintain certain net operating expense ratios for the Fund. When each class of the Fund has exceeded its expense cap, Funds Management has waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses from fund-level expenses on a proportionate basis and then from class specific expenses. When only certain classes exceed their expense caps, waivers and/or reimbursements are applied against class specific expenses before fund-level expenses. Net expenses from the affiliated Master Portfolios are included in the expense caps. Funds Management has committed through August 31, 2021 to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap expenses. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. The contractual expense caps are as follows:

Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund  |  27


Notes to financial statements
  Expense ratio caps
Class A 1.13%
Class C 1.88
Class R 1.38
Administrator Class 0.95
Institutional Class 0.80
Distribution fees
The Trust has adopted a distribution plan for Class C and Class R shares of the Fund pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Distribution fees are charged to Class C and Class R shares and paid to Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC ("Funds Distributor"), the principal underwriter, at an annual rate of 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class C shares and 0.25% of the average daily net assets of Class R shares.
In addition, Funds Distributor is entitled to receive the front-end sales charge from the purchase of Class A shares and a contingent deferred sales charge on the redemption of certain Class A shares. Funds Distributor is also entitled to receive the contingent deferred sales charges from redemptions of Class C shares. For the year ended May 31, 2021, Funds Distributor received $28,902 from the sale of Class A shares and $183 in contingent deferred sales charges from redemptions of Class C shares. No contingent deferred sales charges were incurred by Class A shares for the year ended May 31, 2021.
Shareholder servicing fees
The Trust has entered into contracts with one or more shareholder servicing agents, whereby Class A, Class C, Class R, and Administrator Class of the Fund are charged a fee at an annual rate of 0.25% of the average daily net assets of each respective class. A portion of these total shareholder servicing fees were paid to affiliates of Wells Fargo.
Other transactions
On August 14, 2020, Class A, Class C, Class R, and Administration Class of the Fund was reimbursed by Funds Management in the amount of $2,100, $525,311, $13,410 and $171,985, respectively. The reimbursements were made in connection with resolving certain fee reimbursements.
5. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS
The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing in affiliated Master Portfolios. Purchases and sales related to these investments have been calculated by aggregating the results of multiplying the Fund's ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. Purchase and sales in Underlying Funds and unaffiliated securities in which the Fund invests are actual purchases and sales of those investments. Purchases and sales of investments, excluding short-term securities, for the year ended May 31, 2021 were as follows:
Purchases at cost   Sales proceeds
U.S.
government
Non-U.S.
government
  U.S.
government
Non-U.S.
government
$673,625,107 $1,754,596,409   $569,903,346 $1,730,382,051
6. DERIVATIVE TRANSACTIONS
During the year ended May 31, 2021, the Fund entered into futures contracts for hedging purposes. The Fund had an average notional amount of $234,124,776 in long futures contracts and $184,564,124 in short futures contracts during the year ended May 31, 2021.
A summary of the location of derivative instruments on the financial statements by primary risk exposure is outlined in the following tables.

28  |  Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund


Notes to financial statements
The fair value of derivative instruments as of May 31, 2021 by primary risk type was as follows for the Fund:
  Asset derivatives   Liability derivatives
Asset Allocation Statement of Assets and
Liabilities location
Fair value   Statement of Assets and
Liabilities location
Fair value
Interest rate risk Unrealized gains on futures contracts $ 0*   Unrealized losses on futures contracts $ 272,700*
Equity risk Unrealized gains on futures contracts 934,750*   Unrealized losses on futures contracts 5,026,841*
Foreign currency risk Unrealized gains on futures contracts 82,817*   Unrealized losses on futures contracts 0*
    $1,017,567     $5,299,541
    
* Amount represents cumulative unrealized gains (losses) on futures contracts as reported in the table following the Portfolio of Investments. Only the current day’s variation margin as of May 31, 2021 is reported separately on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
The effect of derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations for the year ended May 31, 2021 was as follows:
  Amount of realized
gains (losses) on
derivatives
Change in unrealized
gains (losses) on
derivatives
Equity risk $ 35,856,535 $ (15,604,112)
Interest rate risk 2,695,246 (272,700)
Foreign currency risk (4,412,103) 821,520
  $34,139,678 $(15,055,292)
7. BANK BORROWINGS
The Trust (excluding the money market funds), Wells Fargo Master Trust and Wells Fargo Variable Trust are parties to a $350,000,000 revolving credit agreement whereby the Fund is permitted to use bank borrowings for temporary or emergency purposes, such as to fund shareholder redemption requests. Interest under the credit agreement is charged to the Fund based on a borrowing rate equal to the higher of the Federal Funds rate in effect on that day plus 1.25% or the overnight LIBOR rate in effect on that day plus 1.25%. In addition, an annual commitment fee equal to 0.25% of the unused balance is allocated to each participating fund.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, there were no borrowings by the Fund under the agreement.
8. DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS
The tax character of distributions paid during the years ended May 31, 2021, May 31, 2020 and April 30, 2020 were as follows:
       
  Year ended
May 31, 2021
Year ended
May 31, 20201
Year ended
April 30, 2020
Ordinary income $52,137,175 $0 $ 9,487,853
Long-term capital gain 15,936,335 0 19,663,594
    
1 For the one month ended May 31, 2020. The Fund changed its fiscal year end from April 30 to May 31, effective May 31, 2020.

Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund  |  29


Notes to financial statements
As of May 31, 2021, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Undistributed
ordinary
income
Undistributed
long-term
gain
Unrealized
gains
$111,956,645 $60,823,864 $301,712,900
9. INDEMNIFICATION
Under the Fund's organizational documents, the officers and Trustees have been granted certain indemnification rights against certain liabilities that may arise out of performance of their duties to the Fund. The Fund has entered into a separate agreement with each Trustee that converts indemnification rights currently existing under the Fund’s organizational documents into contractual rights that cannot be changed in the future without the consent of the Trustee. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with service providers that contain a variety of indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent on future claims that may be made against the Fund and, therefore, cannot be estimated.
10. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
In August 2018, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 updates the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Management has adopted this guidance which did not have a material impact on the financial statements.
11. CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization announced that it had made the assessment that coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) is a pandemic. The impacts of COVID-19 are affecting the entire global economy, individual companies and investment products, the funds, and the market in general. There is significant uncertainty around the extent and duration of business disruptions related to COVID-19 and the impacts may last for an extended period of time. COVID-19 has led to significant uncertainty and volatility in the financial markets.
12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
At a meeting held July 15, 2021, the Board of Trustees of the Wells Fargo Funds approved a change in the Fund's name to remove “Wells Fargo” from the Fund's name and replace with “Allspring”. The change is expected to go into effect on October 11, 2021.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) announced that it will be changing its company name to Allspring Global Investments upon the closing of the previously announced sale transaction of WFAM by Wells Fargo & Company to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. The new corporate name is expected to go into effect on the closing date of the transaction, which is anticipated to occur in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
Following the closing of the transaction, Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the Fund's investment manager, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, each sub-advisers to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Fund's principal underwriter, will each be rebranded as Allspring.

30  |  Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund


Report of independent registered public accounting firm
To the Shareholders of the Fund and Board of Trustees
Wells Fargo Funds Trust:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund (the Fund), one of the funds constituting Wells Fargo Funds Trust, including the portfolio of investments, as of May 31, 2021, the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for the year ended May 31, 2021, the period from May 1, 2020 to May 31, 2020, and for the year ended April 30, 2020, and the related notes (collectively, the financial statements) and the financial highlights for the year ended May 31, 2021, the period from May 1, 2020 to May 31, 2020, and for each of the years in the four-year period ended April 30, 2020. In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of May 31, 2021, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for the year ended May 31, 2021, the period from May 1, 2020 to May 31, 2020, and the year ended April 30, 2020, and the financial highlights for the year ended May 31, 2021, the period from May 1, 2020 to May 31, 2020, and for each of the years in the four-year period ended April 30, 2020, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Fund in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and financial highlights, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. Such procedures also included confirmation of securities owned as of May 31, 2021, by correspondence with the custodian, transfer agent and brokers, or by other appropriate auditing procedures. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and financial highlights. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have not been able to determine the specific year that we began serving as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies; however, we are aware that we have served as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies since at least 1955.
Boston, Massachusetts
July 28, 2021

Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund  |  31


Other information (unaudited)
TAX INFORMATION
For corporate shareholders, pursuant to Section 854 of the Internal Revenue Code, 15% of ordinary income dividends qualify for the corporate dividends-received deduction for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 852 of the Internal Revenue Code, $15,936,335 was designated as a 20% rate gain distribution for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 854 of the Internal Revenue Code, $27,602,230 of income dividends paid during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 has been designated as qualified dividend income (QDI).
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, $23,923,255 has been designated as interest-related dividends for nonresident alien shareholders pursuant to Section 871 of the Internal Revenue Code.
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, $5,518,828 has been designated as short-term capital gain dividends for nonresident alien shareholders pursuant to Section 871 of the Internal Revenue Code.
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, 2% of the ordinary income distributed was derived from interest on U.S. government securities.
For corporate shareholders, pursuant to Section 163(j) of the Internal Revenue Code, 19% of ordinary income dividends qualify as interest dividends for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021.
PROXY VOTING INFORMATION
A description of the policies and procedures used to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-222-8222, visiting our website at wfam.com, or visiting the SEC website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the proxies related to portfolio securities were voted during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the website at wfam.com or by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS INFORMATION
The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year as an exhibit to its reports on Form N-PORT. Shareholders may view the filed Form N-PORT by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov.

32  |  Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund


Other information (unaudited)
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS
Each of the Trustees and Officers listed in the table below acts in identical capacities for each fund in the Wells Fargo family of funds, which consists of 139 mutual funds comprising the Wells Fargo Funds Trust, Wells Fargo Variable Trust, Wells Fargo Master Trust and four closed-end funds (collectively the “Fund Complex”). This table should be read in conjunction with the Prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information1. The mailing address of each Trustee and Officer is 525 Market Street, 12th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105. Each Trustee and Officer serves an indefinite term, however, each Trustee serves such term until reaching the mandatory retirement age established by the Trustees.
Independent Trustees
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service*
Principal occupations during past five years or longer Current other
public company or
investment
company
directorships
William R. Ebsworth
(Born 1957)
Trustee,
since 2015
Retired. From 1984 to 2013, equities analyst, portfolio manager, research director and chief investment officer at Fidelity Management and Research Company in Boston, Tokyo, and Hong Kong, and retired in 2013 as Chief Investment Officer of Fidelity Strategic Advisers, Inc. where he led a team of investment professionals managing client assets. Prior thereto, Board member of Hong Kong Securities Clearing Co., Hong Kong Options Clearing Corp., the Thailand International Fund, Ltd., Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company, and Empire Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company. Audit Committee Chair and Investment Committee Chair of the Vincent Memorial Hospital Endowment (non-profit organization). Mr. Ebsworth is a CFA® charterholder. N/A
Jane A. Freeman
(Born 1953)
Trustee,
since 2015;
Chair Liaison,
since 2018
Retired. From 2012 to 2014 and 1999 to 2008, Chief Financial Officer of Scientific Learning Corporation. From 2008 to 2012, Ms. Freeman provided consulting services related to strategic business projects. Prior to 1999, Portfolio Manager at Rockefeller & Co. and Scudder, Stevens & Clark. Board member of the Harding Loevner Funds from 1996 to 2014, serving as both Lead Independent Director and chair of the Audit Committee. Board member of the Russell Exchange Traded Funds Trust from 2011 to 2012 and the chair of the Audit Committee. Ms. Freeman is also an inactive Chartered Financial Analyst. N/A
Isaiah Harris, Jr.
(Born 1952)
Trustee,
since 2009; Audit
Committee
Chair,
since 2019
Retired. Chairman of the Board of CIGNA Corporation since 2009, and Director since 2005. From 2003 to 2011, Director of Deluxe Corporation. Prior thereto, President and CEO of BellSouth Advertising and Publishing Corp. from 2005 to 2007, President and CEO of BellSouth Enterprises from 2004 to 2005 and President of BellSouth Consumer Services from 2000 to 2003. Emeritus member of the Iowa State University Foundation Board of Governors. Emeritus Member of the Advisory Board of Iowa State University School of Business. Advisory Board Member, Palm Harbor Academy (private school). Mr. Harris is a certified public accountant (inactive status). CIGNA Corporation
Judith M. Johnson
(Born 1949)
Trustee,
since 2008
Retired. Prior thereto, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund from 1996 to 2008. Ms. Johnson is an attorney, certified public accountant and a certified managerial accountant. N/A
David F. Larcker
(Born 1950)
Trustee,
since 2009
James Irvin Miller Professor of Accounting at the Graduate School of Business (Emeritus), Stanford University, Director of the Corporate Governance Research Initiative and Senior Faculty of The Rock Center for Corporate Governance since 2006. From 2005 to 2008, Professor of Accounting at the Graduate School of Business, Stanford University. Prior thereto, Ernst & Young Professor of Accounting at The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania from 1985 to 2005. N/A

Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund  |  33


Other information (unaudited)
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service*
Principal occupations during past five years or longer Current other
public company or
investment
company
directorships
Olivia S. Mitchell
(Born 1953)
Trustee,
since 2006;
Nominating and
Governance
Committee Chair,
since 2018
International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans Professor, Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania since 1993. Director of Wharton’s Pension Research Council and Boettner Center on Pensions & Retirement Research, and Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. Previously, Cornell University Professor from 1978 to 1993. N/A
Timothy J. Penny
(Born 1951)
Trustee,
since 1996;
Chair,
since 2018
President and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Minnesota Initiative Foundation, a non-profit organization, since 2007. Member of the Board of Trustees of NorthStar Education Finance, Inc., a non-profit organization, since 2007. N/A
James G. Polisson
(Born 1959)
Trustee,
since 2018
Retired. Chief Marketing Officer, Source (ETF) UK Services, Ltd, from 2015 to 2017. From 2012 to 2015, Principal of The Polisson Group, LLC, a management consulting, corporate advisory and principal investing company. Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director at Russell Investments, Global Exchange Traded Funds from 2010 to 2012. Managing Director of Barclays Global Investors from 1998 to 2010 and Global Chief Marketing Officer for iShares and Barclays Global Investors from 2000 to 2010. Trustee of the San Francisco Mechanics’ Institute, a non-profit organization, from 2013 to 2015. Board member of the Russell Exchange Traded Fund Trust from 2011 to 2012. Director of Barclays Global Investors Holdings Deutschland GmbH from 2006 to 2009. Mr. Polisson is an attorney and has a retired status with the Massachusetts and District of Columbia Bar Associations. N/A
Pamela Wheelock
(Born 1959)
Trustee,
since January
2020; previously
Trustee from
January 2018 to
July 2019
Board member of the Destination Medical Center Economic Development Agency, Rochester, Minnesota since 2019. Interim President of the McKnight Foundation from January to September 2020. Acting Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Human Services, July 2019 through September 2019. Human Services Manager (part-time), Minnesota Department of Human Services, October 2019 through December 2019. Chief Operating Officer, Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity from 2017 to 2019. Vice President of University Services, University of Minnesota from 2012 to 2016. Prior thereto, on the Board of Directors, Governance Committee and Finance Committee for the Minnesota Philanthropy Partners (Saint Paul Foundation) from 2012 to 2018, Interim Chief Executive Officer of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota from 2011 to 2012, Chairman of the Board from 2009 to 2012 and Board Director from 2003 to 2015. Vice President, Leadership and Community Engagement, Bush Foundation, Saint Paul, Minnesota (a private foundation) from 2009 to 2011. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Minnesota Sports and Entertainment from 2004 to 2009 and Senior Vice President from 2002 to 2004. Executive Vice President of the Minnesota Wild Foundation from 2004 to 2008. Commissioner of Finance, State of Minnesota, from 1999 to 2002. Currently Board Chair of the Minnesota Wild Foundation since 2010. N/A
*  Length of service dates reflect the Trustee’s commencement of service with the Trust’s predecessor entities, where applicable.

34  |  Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund


Other information (unaudited)
Officers
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service
Principal occupations during past five years or longer
Andrew Owen
(Born 1960)
President,
since 2017
Executive Vice President of Wells Fargo & Company and Head of Affiliated Managers, Wells Fargo Asset Management, since 2014. In addition, Mr. Owen is currently President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC since 2017. Prior thereto, Executive Vice President responsible for marketing, investments and product development for Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, from 2009 to 2014.
Jeremy DePalma
(Born 1974)
Treasurer,
since 2012
(for certain funds in
the Fund Complex);
since 2021 (for
the remaining funds in the
Fund Complex)
Senior Vice President of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC since 2009. Senior Vice President of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC from 2008 to 2010 and head of the Fund Reporting and Control Team within Fund Administration from 2005 to 2010.
Michelle Rhee
(Born 1966)
Chief Legal Officer,
since 2019
Secretary of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC and Chief Legal Counsel of Wells Fargo Asset Management since 2018. Deputy General Counsel of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. since 2020 and Assistant General Counsel of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. from 2018 to 2020. Associate General Counsel and Managing Director of Bank of America Corporation from 2004 to 2018.
Catherine Kennedy
(Born 1969)
Secretary,
since 2019
Vice President of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC and Senior Counsel of the Wells Fargo Legal Department since 2010. Vice President and Senior Counsel of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC from 1998 to 2010.
Michael H. Whitaker
(Born 1967)
Chief Compliance Officer,
since 2016
Chief Compliance Officer of Wells Fargo Asset Management since 2016. Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer for Fidelity Investments from 2007 to 2016.
1  The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about the Trustees and is available, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-222-8222 or by visiting the website at wfam.com.

Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund  |  35


Other information (unaudited)
LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
In accordance with Rule 22e-4 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Liquidity Rule”), Wells Fargo Funds Trust (the “Trust”) has adopted and implemented a liquidity risk management program (the “Program”) on behalf of each of its series, including the Fund, which is reasonably designed to assess and manage the Fund's liquidity risk. “Liquidity risk” is defined under the Liquidity Rule as the risk that the Fund is unable to meet redemption requests without significantly diluting remaining investors’ interests in the Fund. The Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”) previously approved the designation of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”), the Fund's investment manager, as the administrator of the Program, and Funds Management has established a Liquidity Risk Management Council (the "Council") composed of personnel from multiple departments within Funds Management and its affiliates to assist Funds Management in the implementation and on-going administration of the Program.
The Program is comprised of various components designed to support the assessment and/or management of liquidity risk, including: (1) the periodic assessment (no less frequently than annually) of certain factors that influence the Fund's liquidity risk; (2) the periodic classification (no less frequently than monthly) of the Fund's investments into one of four liquidity categories that reflect an estimate of their liquidity under current market conditions; (3) a 15% limit on the acquisition of “illiquid investments” (as defined under the Liquidity Rule); (4) to the extent the Fund does not invest primarily in “highly liquid investments” (as defined under the Liquidity Rule), the determination of a minimum percentage of the Fund's assets that generally will be invested in highly liquid investments (an “HLIM”); (5) if the Fund has established an HLIM, the periodic review (no less frequently than annually) of the HLIM and the adoption of policies and procedures for responding to a shortfall of the Fund's “highly liquid investments” below its HLIM; and (6) periodic reporting to the Board.
At a meeting of the Board held on May 17-19, 2021, the Board received and reviewed a written report (the “Report”) from Funds Management that addressed the operation of the Program and assessed its adequacy and effectiveness for the period from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 (the “Reporting Period”). Among other things, the Report discussed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on liquidity and management of liquidity risk during the Reporting Period, including during the stressed market conditions caused by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. No significant liquidity events impacting the Fund were noted in the Report. As applicable to the Fund, there were no material changes to the Program during the Reporting Period.
Funds Management concluded in the Report that the Program is operating effectively to assess and manage the Fund’s liquidity risk, and that the Program has been and continues to be adequately and effectively implemented to monitor and, as applicable, respond to the Fund’s liquidity developments.
There can be no assurance that the Program will achieve its objectives under all circumstances in the future. Please refer to the Fund’s prospectus for more information regarding the Fund’s exposure to liquidity risk and other risks to which an investment in the Fund may be subject.

36  |  Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
BOARD CONSIDERATION OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AND SUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENTS:
Board Considerations - Current Agreements
Under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Wells Fargo Funds Trust (the “Trust”) must determine annually whether to approve the continuation of the Trust’s investment management and sub-advisory agreements. In this regard, at a Board meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Meeting”), the Board, all the members of which have no direct or indirect interest in the investment management and sub-advisory agreements and are not “interested persons” of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), reviewed and approved for Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund (the “Fund”): (i) an investment management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”); and (ii) an investment sub-advisory agreement (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Wells Capital Management Incorporated (the “Sub-Adviser”), an affiliate of Funds Management. The Management Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement are collectively referred to as the “Advisory Agreements.”
The Board noted that Wells Fargo & Company recently announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”), which includes Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser, to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. and/or their affiliates (the “Transaction”). The Board further noted that the Transaction would result in a change-of-control of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser, which would be considered to be an assignment that would result in the termination of the Advisory Agreements. In light of the Transaction, the Board separately considered for approval a new investment management agreement with Funds Management and a new sub-advisory agreement with the Sub-Adviser (the “New Agreements”) that would replace the Advisory Agreements upon consummation of the Transaction, subject to approval of the New Agreements by the Fund’s shareholders. The Board also considered for approval interim agreements to go into effect in the event shareholders do not approve the New Agreements before the Transaction is completed. The interim agreements would allow the Manager and the Sub-Adviser to continue providing services to the Fund while the Fund continues to seek shareholder approval of the New Agreements. The Board noted that the terms of the interim agreements would be identical to those of the current Advisory Agreements, except for the term and certain escrow provisions.
At the Meeting, the Board considered the factors and reached the conclusions described below relating to the selection of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser and the approval of the Advisory Agreements. Prior to the Meeting, including at Board meetings held in April and May 2021, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with representatives of Funds Management about these matters. Also, the Board has adopted a team-based approach, with each team consisting of a sub-set of Trustees, to assist the full Board in the discharge of its duties in reviewing investment performance and other matters throughout the year. The Independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Advisory Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately.
In providing information to the Board, Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser were guided by a detailed set of requests for information submitted to them by independent legal counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees at the start of the Board’s annual contract renewal process earlier in 2021. In considering and approving the Advisory Agreements, the Trustees considered the information they believed relevant, including but not limited to the information discussed below. The Board considered not only the specific information presented in connection with the Meeting, but also the knowledge gained over time through interaction with Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser about various topics. In this regard, the Board reviewed reports of Funds Management at each of its quarterly meetings, which included, among other things, portfolio reviews and investment performance reports. In addition, the Board and the teams mentioned above confer with portfolio managers at various times throughout the year. The Board did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each individual Trustee may have attributed different weights to various factors.
After its deliberations, the Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser under each of the Advisory Agreements was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Advisory Agreements for a one-year term. The Board considered the approval of the Advisory Agreements for the Fund as part of its consideration of agreements for funds across the complex, but its approvals were made on a fund-by-fund basis. The following summarizes a number of important, but not necessarily all, factors considered by the Board in support of its approvals.
Nature, extent and quality of services
The Board received and considered various information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser under the Advisory Agreements. This information included a description of the investment advisory services and Fund-level administrative services covered by the Management Agreement, as well as, among other things, a summary of the background and experience of senior management of WFAM, of which Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser are a part, and a summary of investments made in the business of WFAM. The Board also received a description of

Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund  |  37


Board considerations (unaudited)
Funds Management’s and the Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans, including a summary of the performance of such plans and any changes thereto during the COVID-19 pandemic, and of their approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity. The Board also received and reviewed information about Funds Management’s role as administrator of the Fund’s liquidity risk management program, Funds Management’s approach to risk management, and Funds Management’s intermediary and vendor oversight program.
The Board also considered the qualifications, background, tenure and responsibilities of each of the portfolio managers primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the Fund. The Board evaluated the ability of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser to attract and retain qualified investment professionals, including research, advisory and supervisory personnel.
The Board further considered the compliance programs and compliance records of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser. In addition, the Board took into account the full range of services provided to the Fund by Funds Management and its affiliates. The Board also considered information about retention and back-up arrangements that have been put into place with respect to key personnel of WFAM in connection with the anticipated Transaction, noting that WFAM provided assurances that the announcement and eventual culmination of the Transaction is not expected to result in any diminution in the nature or quality of services provided to the Fund.
Fund investment performance and expenses
The Board considered the investment performance results for the Fund over various time periods ended December 31, 2020. The Board considered these results in comparison to the investment performance of funds in a universe that was determined by Broadridge Inc. (“Broadridge”) to be similar to the Fund (the “Universe”), and in comparison to the Fund’s benchmark index and to other comparative data. Broadridge is an independent provider of investment company data. The Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the performance Universe. The Board noted that the investment performance of the Fund (Administrator Class) was lower than the average investment performance of the Universe for all periods under review except the one-year period, which was higher than the average investment performance of the Universe. The Board also noted that the investment performance of the Fund was lower than its benchmark index, the Asset Allocation Blended Index, for all periods under review.
The Board received information concerning, and discussed factors contributing to, the underperformance of the Fund relative to the Universe and benchmark for the periods identified above. The Board took note of the explanations for the relative underperformance during these periods, including with respect to investment decisions and market factors that affected the Fund’s investment performance.
The Board also received and considered information regarding the Fund’s net operating expense ratios and their various components, including actual management fees, custodian and other non-management fees, and Rule 12b-1 and non-Rule 12b-1 shareholder service fees. The Board considered these ratios in comparison to the median ratios of funds in class-specific expense groups that were determined by Broadridge to be similar to the Fund (the “Groups”). The Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the expense Groups and an explanation of how funds comprising expense groups and their expense ratios may vary from year-to-year. Based on the Broadridge reports, the Board noted that the net operating expense ratios of the Fund were in range of the median net operating expense ratios of the expense Groups for each share class except for the Administrator Class, which was lower than the median net operating expense ratio of the expense Group.
The Board took into account the Fund’s investment performance and expense information provided to it among the factors considered in deciding to re-approve the Advisory Agreements.
Investment management and sub-advisory fee rates
The Board reviewed and considered the contractual fee rates payable by the Fund to Funds Management under the Management Agreement, as well as the contractual fee rates payable by the Fund to Funds Management for class-level administrative services under a Class-Level Administration Agreement, which include, among other things, class-level transfer agency and sub-transfer agency costs (collectively, the “Management Rates”). The Board also reviewed and considered the contractual investment sub-advisory fee rates that are payable by Funds Management to the Sub-Adviser for investment sub-advisory services.
Among other information reviewed by the Board was a comparison of the Fund’s Management Rates with the average contractual investment management fee rates of funds in the expense Groups at a common asset level as well as transfer agency costs of the funds in the expense Groups. The Board noted that the Management Rates of the Fund were higher than the sum of these average rates for the Fund’s expense Groups for all share classes. However, the Board also noted that the net operating expense ratios of the Fund were in range of the median net operating expense ratios of the expense Groups for each share class except for

38  |  Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
the Administrator Class, which was lower than the median net operating expense ratio of the expense Group. The Board also noted that the Fund’s expense caps for all share classes were lowered in 2018.
The Board also received and considered information about the portion of the total management fee that was retained by Funds Management after payment of the fee to the Sub-Adviser for sub-advisory services. In assessing the reasonableness of this amount, the Board received and evaluated information about the nature and extent of responsibilities retained and risks assumed by Funds Management and not delegated to or assumed by the Sub-Adviser, and about Funds Management’s on-going oversight services. Given the affiliation between Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser, the Board ascribed limited relevance to the allocation of fees between them.
The Board also received and considered information about the nature and extent of services offered and fee rates charged by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser to other types of clients with investment strategies similar to those of the Fund. In this regard, the Board received information about the significantly greater scope of services, and compliance, reporting and other legal burdens and risks of managing proprietary mutual funds compared with those associated with managing assets of other types of clients, including third-party sub-advised fund clients and non-mutual fund clients such as institutional separate accounts.
Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Board determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the Management Agreement and to the Sub-Adviser under the Sub-Advisory Agreement was reasonable.
Profitability
The Board received and considered information concerning the profitability of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo & Co. (“Wells Fargo”) from providing services to the fund family as a whole. The Board noted that the Sub-Adviser’s profitability information with respect to providing services to the Fund and other funds in the family was subsumed in the WFAM and Wells Fargo profitability analysis.
Funds Management reported on the methodologies and estimates used in calculating profitability, including a description of the methodology used to allocate certain expenses. Among other things, the Board noted that the levels of profitability reported on a fund-by-fund basis varied widely, depending on factors such as the size, type and age of fund.
Based on its review, the Board did not deem the profits reported by Funds Management, WFAM or Wells Fargo from services provided to the Fund to be at a level that would prevent it from approving the continuation of the Advisory Agreements.
Economies of scale
The Board received and considered information about the potential for Funds Management to experience economies of scale in the provision of management services to the Fund, the difficulties of calculating economies of scale at an individual fund level, and the extent to which potential scale benefits are shared with Fund shareholders. The Board noted the existence of breakpoints in the Fund’s management fee structure, which operate generally to reduce the Fund’s expense ratios as the Fund grows in size, and the size of the Fund in relation to such breakpoints. The Board considered that in addition to management fee breakpoints, Funds Management shares potential economies of scale from its management business in a variety of ways, including through fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangements, competitive management fee rates set at the outset without regard to breakpoints, and investments in the business intended to enhance services available to shareholders.
The Board concluded that Funds Management’s arrangements with respect to the Fund, including contractual breakpoints, constituted a reasonable approach to sharing potential economies of scale with the Fund and its shareholders.
Other benefits to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser
The Board received and considered information regarding potential “fall-out” or ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including the Sub-Adviser, as a result of their relationships with the Fund. Ancillary benefits could include, among others, benefits directly attributable to other relationships with the Fund and benefits potentially derived from an increase in Funds Management’s and the Sub-Adviser’s business as a result of their relationships with the Fund. The Board noted that various affiliates of Funds Management may receive distribution-related fees, shareholder servicing payments and sub-transfer agency fees in respect of shares sold or held through them and services provided.
The Board also reviewed information about soft dollar credits earned and utilized by the Sub-Adviser, fees earned by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser from managing a private investment vehicle for the fund family’s securities lending collateral, and commissions earned by an affiliated broker from portfolio transactions.
Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Board did not find that any ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including the Sub-Adviser, were unreasonable.

Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund  |  39


Board considerations (unaudited)
Conclusion
At the Meeting, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser under each of the Advisory Agreements was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Advisory Agreements for a one-year term.

40  |  Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board Considerations - New Agreements
Overview of the Board evaluation process
At a meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Board Meeting”), the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Wells Fargo Funds Trust (the “Trust”, and the series identified below, the “Funds”) approved the continuation of each Fund’s current Investment Management Agreement (the “Current Investment Management Agreement”) and the current Sub-Advisory Agreements (the “Current Sub-Advisory Agreements”, and collectively, the “Current Agreements”).
Wells Fargo Adjustable Rate Government Fund
Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund
Wells Fargo Conservative Income Fund
Wells Fargo Diversified Capital Builder Fund
Wells Fargo Diversified Income Builder Fund
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund
Wells Fargo Global Small Cap Fund
Wells Fargo Government Securities Fund
Wells Fargo High Yield Bond Fund
Wells Fargo Income Plus Fund
Wells Fargo Index Asset Allocation Fund
Wells Fargo International Bond Fund
Wells Fargo International Equity Fund
Wells Fargo Precious Metals Fund
Wells Fargo Short Duration Government Bond Fund
Wells Fargo Short-Term Bond Plus Fund
Wells Fargo Short-Term High Yield Bond Fund
Wells Fargo Spectrum Income Allocation Fund
Wells Fargo Spectrum Growth Fund
Wells Fargo Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund
Wells Fargo Ultra Short-Term Income Fund
Wells Fargo Utility and Telecommunications Fund
Each Trustee on the Board is not an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”)) of the Funds (collectively, the “Independent Trustees”). The process followed by the Board in considering and approving the continuation of the Current Agreements is referred to herein as the “2021 Annual Approval Process.”
As noted above, the closing of the sale of Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”) to a holding company (“NewCo”) affiliated with private funds of GTCR LLC (“GTCR”) and of Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. (“Reverence Capital”, and such transaction, the “Transaction”) will result in a change of control of Wells Fargo Funds Management LLC (“Funds Management”), Wells Capital Management Incorporated (“Wells Capital”) and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited (“WFAM(I) Ltd.”, and together with Funds Management and Wells Capital, the “Advisers”), which will be considered to be an “assignment” of each Fund’s Current Agreements under the 1940 Act that will result in the automatic termination of each Fund’s Current Agreements. In light of the expected termination of each Fund’s Current Agreements upon the closing, at the Board Meeting the Board also considered and approved the New Agreements, which are: (i) a new Investment Management Agreement (the “New Investment Management Agreement”) between the Trust, on behalf of each Fund, and Funds Management; (ii) a new Sub-Advisory Agreement (the “New Wells Capital Sub-Advisory Agreement”) among the Trust, on behalf of each Fund other than International Bond Fund, Funds Management and Wells Capital; and (iii) Sub-Advisory Agreement (the “New WFAM(I) Ltd Sub-Advisory Agreement”, and collectively, the “New Agreements”) among the Trust, on behalf of International Bond Fund, Funds Management and WFAM(I) Ltd (together with Wells Capital, the “Sub-Advisers”) with respect to International Bond Fund, each of which is intended to go into effect upon the closing. The process followed by the Board in reviewing and approving the New Agreements is referred to herein as the “New Agreement Approval Process.”

Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund  |  41


Board considerations (unaudited)
At a series of meetings held in April and May 2021 (collectively, “April and May 2021 Meetings”) and at the Board Meeting, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital about the New Agreements and related matters. The Board reviewed and discussed information furnished by Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital that the Board considered reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the New Agreements and the services to be provided. At these meetings, senior representatives from Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital made presentations to, and responded to questions from, the Board.
In providing information to the Board in connection with the 2021 annual approval process for the Current Agreements (the “2021 Annual Approval Process”) and the New Agreement Approval Process, Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital (as applicable) were guided by requests for information submitted by independent legal counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. In considering and approving the New Agreements, the Trustees considered the information they believed relevant, including but not limited to the information discussed herein. The Board considered not only the specific information presented in connection with the April and May 2021 Meetings as well as the Board Meeting, but also the knowledge gained over time through interaction with Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers about various topics. In this regard, the Board reviews reports of Funds Management at each of its regular Board meetings, which includes, among other things, portfolio reviews and investment performance reports. In addition, the Board confers with portfolio managers at various times throughout the year. The Board was assisted in its evaluation of the New Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom the Independent Trustees received separate legal advice and with whom the Independent Trustees met separately. The Board did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each individual Trustee may have attributed different weights to various factors.
Among other information considered by the Board in connection with the Transaction was:
■  Information regarding the Transaction: information about the structure, financing sources and material terms and conditions of the Transaction, including the expected impact on the businesses conducted by the Advisers and by Wells Fargo Funds Distributor LLC, as the distributor of Fund shares.
■  Information regarding NewCo, GTCR and Reverence Capital: (i) information about NewCo, including information about its expected financial condition and access to capital, and senior leadership team; (ii) the experience of senior management at GTCR and Reverence Capital in acquiring portfolio companies; (iii) the plan to operationalize NewCo, including the transition of necessary infrastructure services through a transition services agreement with Wells Fargo under which Wells Fargo will continue to provide NewCo with certain services for a specified period of time after the closing; and (iv) information regarding regulatory matters, compliance, and risk management functions at NewCo, including resources to be dedicated thereto.
■  Impact of the Transaction on WFAM and Service Providers: (i) information regarding any changes to personnel and/or other resources of the Advisers as a result of the Transaction, including assurances regarding comparable and competitive compensation arrangements to attract and retain highly qualified personnel; and (ii) information about the organizational and operating structure with respect to NewCo, the Advisers and the Funds.
■  Impact of the Transaction on the Funds and their Shareholders: (i) information regarding anticipated benefits to the Funds as a result of the Transaction; (ii) a commitment that the Funds would not bear any expenses, directly or indirectly, in connection with the Transaction; (iii) confirmation that the Advisers intend to continue to manage the Funds in a manner consistent with each Fund’s current investment objectives and principal investments strategies; and (iv) a commitment that neither NewCo nor WFAM will take any steps that would impose any “unfair burden” (as that term is used in section 15(f)(1)(B) of the 1940 Act) on the Funds as a result of the Transaction.
With respect to the New Agreements, the Board considered: (i) a representation that, after the closing, all of the Funds will continue to be managed and advised by their current Advisers, and that the same portfolio managers of the Sub-Advisers are expected to continue to manage the Funds after the Transaction; (ii) information regarding the terms of the New Agreements, including changes as compared to the Current Agreements; (iii) information confirming that the fee rates payable under the New Agreements will not increase as a result of the Transaction as compared to the rates under the Current Agreements; and (iv) assurances that the Transaction is not expected to cause any diminution with respect to the nature, extent and quality of any of the services currently provided to the Funds by the Advisers as a result of the Transaction.
In addition to considering information furnished specifically to evaluate the impact of the Transaction on the Funds and their respective shareholders in connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board considered information furnished at prior meetings of the Board and its committees, including detailed information provided in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process. In this regard, in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board received information about

42  |  Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
complex-wide and individual Fund performance, fees and expenses, including: (i) a report from an independent data provider comparing the investment performance of each Fund to the investment performance of comparable funds and benchmark indices, over various time periods; (ii) a report from an independent data provider comparing each Fund’s total expense ratio (and its components) to those of comparable funds; (iii) comparative information concerning the fees charged and services provided by the Advisers to each Fund in managing other accounts (which may include other mutual funds, collective investment funds and institutional accounts), if any, that employ investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing such Fund(s); and (iv) profitability analyses of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo from providing services to the fund family as a whole.
After its deliberations, the Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the New Agreements is reasonable, approved the New Agreements for a two-year term, and voted to recommend that Fund shareholders approve the New Agreements. The Board considered the approval of the New Agreements as part of its consideration of agreements for funds across the complex, but its approvals were made on a fund-by-fund basis. The following summarizes a number of important, but not necessarily all, factors considered by the Board in support of its approvals.
Nature, extent and quality of services
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board received and considered various information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the Advisory Agreements. This information included a description of the investment advisory services and Fund-level administrative services covered by the Current Management Agreement, as well as, among other things, a summary of the background and experience of senior management of WFAM, of which Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers are a part, and a summary of investments made in the business of WFAM. The Board also received a description of Funds Management’s and the Sub-Advisers’ business continuity plans, including a summary of the performance of such plans and any changes thereto during the COVID-19 pandemic, and of their approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity. The Board also received and reviewed information about Funds Management’s role as administrator of the Funds’ liquidity risk management program, Funds Management’s approach to risk management, and Funds Management’s intermediary and vendor oversight program.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board also considered the qualifications, background, tenure and responsibilities of each of the portfolio managers primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the Funds. The Board evaluated the ability of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to attract and retain qualified investment professionals, including research, advisory and supervisory personnel.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board further considered the compliance programs and compliance records of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers. In addition, the Board took into account the full range of services provided to the Fund by Funds Management and its affiliates.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board considered, among other information, the structure of the Transaction and expected impact, if any, of the Transaction on the operations, facilities, organization and personnel of the Advisers. The Board received assurances from Funds Management that each Fund will continue to be advised by its current Sub-Adviser after the closing, and that the same individual portfolio managers are expected to continue to manage the Funds after the closing. With respect to the recruitment and retention of key personnel, the Board noted information from GTCR, Reverence Capital and the Advisers regarding the potential benefits for employees of joining NewCo. The Board recognized that the personnel who had been extended offers may not accept such offers and personnel changes may occur in the future in the ordinary course.
In addition, the Board considered information regarding the infrastructure, operational capabilities and support staff in place to assist in the portfolio management and operations of the Funds, including the provision of administrative services, and the anticipated impact of the Transaction on such matters. The Board also considered the business-related and other risks to which the Advisers may be subject in managing the Funds and in connection with the Transaction. The Board also considered the transition and integration plans as a result of the change in ownership of the Advisers from Wells Fargo to NewCo. The Board considered the resources and infrastructure that NewCo intends to devote to its compliance program to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations, as well as its risk management program and cybersecurity program. The Board also took into account assurances received from the Advisers, GTCR and Reverence Capital that the Transaction is not expected to cause any diminution in the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Advisers to the Funds and their shareholders.
Fund investment performance and expenses
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board considered the investment performance results for each Fund over various time periods ended December 31, 2020. The Board considered these results in comparison to the investment performance of funds in a universe that was determined by Broadridge Inc. (“Broadridge”) to be similar to each Fund (the

Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund  |  43


Board considerations (unaudited)
“Universe”), and in comparison to each Fund’s benchmark index and to other comparative data. Broadridge is an independent provider of investment company data. The Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the performance Universe. Where applicable, the Board received information concerning, and discussed factors contributing to, underperformance of Funds relative to the Universe and benchmark for any underperformance periods.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board also received and considered information regarding each Fund’s net operating expense ratios and their various components, including actual management fees, custodian and other non-management fees, and Rule 12b-1 and non-Rule 12b-1 shareholder service fees. The Board considered these ratios in comparison to the median ratios of funds in class-specific expense groups that were determined by Broadridge to be similar to the Fund (the “Groups”). The Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the expense Groups and an explanation of how funds comprising expense groups and their expense ratios may vary from year-to-year.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board received a commitment that WFAM will maintain fee and expense commitments for at least two years after the closing. The Board took into account each Fund’s investment performance and expense information among the factors considered in deciding to approve the New Agreements.
Investment management and sub-advisory fee rates
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board reviewed and considered the contractual fee rates payable by each Fund to Funds Management under the Current Management Agreement, as well as the contractual fee rates payable by each Fund to Funds Management for class-level administrative services under a Class-Level Administration Agreement, which include, among other things, class-level transfer agency and sub-transfer agency costs (collectively, the “Management Rates”). The Board also reviewed and considered the contractual investment sub-advisory fee rates that are payable by Funds Management to each of the Sub-Advisers under the Current Sub-Advisory Agreements for investment sub-advisory services (the “Sub-Advisory Fee Rates”).
Among other information reviewed by the Board in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, was a comparison of each Fund’s Management Rates with the average contractual investment management fee rates of funds in the expense Groups at a common asset level as well as transfer agency costs of the funds in the expense Groups.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board also received and considered information about the portion of the total management fee that was retained by Funds Management after payment of the Sub-Advisory Fee Rates. In assessing the reasonableness of this amount, the Board received and evaluated information about the nature and extent of responsibilities retained and risks assumed by Funds Management and not delegated to or assumed by the Sub-Advisers, and about Funds Management’s on-going oversight services. Given the affiliation between Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers, the Board ascribed limited relevance to the allocation of fees between them.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board also received and considered information about the nature and extent of services offered and fee rates charged by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to other types of clients, if any, with investment strategies similar to those of each Fund. In this regard, the Board received information about the significantly greater scope of services, and compliance, reporting and other legal burdens and risks of managing proprietary mutual funds compared with those associated with managing assets of other types of clients, including third-party sub-advised fund clients and non-mutual fund clients such as institutional separate accounts.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board noted the assurances received by it that there would be no increases to any of the Management Rates or the Sub-Advisory Fee Rates as a result of the Transaction. The Board also considered that the New Agreements do not change the computation method for calculating such fees, and there is no present intention to reduce expense waiver and reimbursement arrangements that are currently in effect. Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Board determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the New Management Agreement and to each of the Sub-Advisers under the New Sub-Advisory Agreements was reasonable.
Profitability
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board received and considered information concerning the profitability of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo from providing services to the fund family as a whole. The Board noted that the Sub-Advisers’ profitability information with respect to providing services to each Fund and other funds in the family was subsumed in the WFAM and Wells Fargo profitability analysis.

44  |  Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
Funds Management reported on the methodologies and estimates used in calculating profitability in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, including a description of the methodology used to allocate certain expenses. Among other things, the Board noted that the levels of profitability reported on a fund-by-fund basis varied widely, depending on factors such as the size, type and age of fund.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board received certain information about NewCo’s projected financial condition, and reviewed with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital the underlying assumptions on which such information was based. The Board considered that NewCo is a newly formed entity, with no historical operations, revenues or expenses, and that it is difficult to predict with any degree of certainty the future profitability of NewCo and the Advisers from advisory activities under the New Agreements. The Board considered that the fee rates payable under the New Agreements will not increase as a result of the Transaction as compared to the rates under the Current Agreements, and that the current contractual expense limitations applicable to each Fund will not increase. The Board noted that if the New Agreements are approved by shareholders and the Transaction closes, the Board will have the opportunity in the future to review the profitability of NewCo and the Advisers from advisory activities under the New Agreements.
Economies of scale
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board received and considered information about the potential for Funds Management to experience economies of scale in the provision of management services to the Funds, the difficulties of calculating economies of scale at an individual fund level, and the extent to which potential scale benefits are shared with Fund shareholders. The Board noted the existence of breakpoints in each Fund’s management fee structure, which operate generally to reduce the Fund’s expense ratios as the Fund grows in size, and the size of the Fund in relation to such breakpoints. The Board considered that, in addition to management fee breakpoints, Funds Management shares potential economies of scale from its management business in a variety of ways, including through fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangements, competitive management fee rates set at the outset without regard to breakpoints, and investments in the business intended to enhance services available to shareholders.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board noted that NewCo and the Advisers may benefit from possible growth of the Funds resulting from enhanced distribution capabilities. However, the Board noted that other factors could also affect the potential for economies of scale, and that it was not possible to quantify any potential future economies of scale. Based upon the information furnished to the Board in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process and the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board concluded that Funds Management’s arrangements with respect to each Fund, including contractual breakpoints and expense limitation arrangements, constituted a reasonable approach to sharing potential economies of scale with the Fund and its shareholders.
“Fall-out” benefits to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board received and considered information regarding potential “fall-out” or ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including the Sub-Advisers, as a result of their relationships with the Funds. Ancillary benefits could include, among others, benefits directly attributable to other relationships with the Funds and benefits potentially derived from an increase in Funds Management’s and the Sub-Advisers’ business as a result of their relationships with the Funds. The Board noted that various current affiliates of Funds Management may receive distribution-related fees, shareholder servicing payments and sub-transfer agency fees in respect of shares sold or held through them and services provided.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board also reviewed information about soft dollar credits earned and utilized by the Sub-Advisers, fees earned by Funds Management and Wells Capital from managing a private investment vehicle for the fund family’s securities lending collateral, and commissions earned by an affiliated broker of Wells Fargo from portfolio transactions.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board received information to the effect that the Transaction is not expected to have a material impact on the fall-out benefits currently realized by Funds Management and its affiliates, including the Sub-Advisers. The information reviewed by the Board also noted that several of the ancillary benefits identified for WFAM would be potential ancillary benefits for NewCo, including that the scale and reputation of the Funds might benefit NewCo’s broader reputation, product initiatives, technology investment and talent acquisition. Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Board did not find that any ancillary benefits expected to be received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including NewCo and the Sub-Advisers, under the New Agreements were unreasonable.

Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund  |  45


Board considerations (unaudited)
Conclusion
At the Board Meeting, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and to each of the Sub-Advisers under the New Agreements is reasonable, approved the New Agreements for a two-year term, and voted to recommend that Fund shareholders approve the New Agreements.

46  |  Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board Considerations - Interim Agreements
At a meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Board Meeting”), the Boards of Trustees (each, a “Board”, and collectively, the “Boards”) of Wells Fargo Funds Trust, Wells Fargo Master Trust, Wells Fargo Variable Trust, Wells Fargo Global Dividend Opportunity Fund, Wells Fargo Income Opportunities Fund, Wells Fargo Multi-Sector Income Fund and Wells Fargo Utilities and High Income Fund (each a “Trust”, and the series thereof, a “Fund”) reviewed and approved for the Trusts and Funds, as applicable: (i) interim investment management agreements (the “Interim Management Agreements”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”); (ii) interim investment advisory agreements (the “Interim Advisory Agreements”) with Funds Management; and (iii) interim sub-advisory agreements (the “Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements”) with each of Cooke & Bieler, L.P., Galliard Capital Management LLC (“Galliard”), Peregrine Capital Management Inc., Wells Capital Management LLC (“WellsCap”), and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited (“WFAMI”, and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”). Each Trustee on the Board is not an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) of the Funds (collectively, the “Independent Trustees”). The Interim Management Agreements, Interim Advisory Agreements, and Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements are collectively referred to as the “Interim Advisory Agreements.”
At the Board Meeting, the Boards reviewed and approved the continuation of existing investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements (the “Current Advisory Agreements”) for each Trust and Fund, as applicable. The factors considered and conclusions reached by the Boards in approving the Current Advisory Agreements are summarized in the section entitled “Board Considerations – Current Agreements” of this shareholder report. The Boards noted that Wells Fargo & Company has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”), which includes Funds Management, Galliard, WellsCap and WFAMI (the “Affiliated Sub-Advisers”), to a holding company affiliated with private funds of GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. (the “Transaction”). The Boards further noted that the Transaction would result in a change-of-control of Funds Management and the Affiliated Sub-Advisers, which would be considered to be an “assignment” under the 1940 Act that would terminate the Current Advisory Agreements. At the Board Meeting, the Boards also reviewed and approved new investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements (the “New Advisory Agreements”) for each Trust and Fund, as applicable, that would replace the Current Advisory Agreements upon consummation of the Transaction, subject to approval of the New Advisory Agreements by the applicable Trust’s or Fund’s shareholders. The factors considered and conclusions reached by the Boards in approving the New Advisory Agreements are summarized in the section entitled “Board Considerations – New Agreements” of this shareholder report.
At the Board Meeting, the Boards also approved the Interim Advisory Agreements, which will go into effect for a Trust or Fund only in the event that shareholders of such Trust or Fund do not approve the New Advisory Agreement(s) for the Trust or Fund by the closing date of the Transaction, when the Current Advisory Agreements will terminate. The Board noted that, in such a circumstance, the Interim Advisory Agreements will permit continuity of management by allowing Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to continue providing services to the Trust or Fund pursuant to the Interim Advisory Agreements while the Trust or Fund continues to solicit shareholder approval of such New Advisory Agreement(s). The Boards noted that the terms of the Interim Advisory Agreements are identical to those of the Current Advisory Agreements, except for the term and the addition of escrow provisions with respect to the advisory fees. The Boards also noted that the entities that would service the Funds and Trusts under the Interim Advisory Agreements are identical to those that provide services under the Current Advisory Agreements and those that will provide services under the New Advisory Agreements.
In approving the Interim Advisory Agreements, the Boards considered the same factors and reached the same conclusions as they considered and reached with respect to the Boards’ approvals of the Current Advisory Agreements and New Advisory Agreements, as applicable, which are described in separate Board Consideration sections within this shareholder report. Prior to the Board Meeting, including at a series of meetings held in April and May 2021, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. about the Interim Advisory Agreements and related matters. The Independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Interim Advisory Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately.
At the Board Meeting, after considering the factors and reaching the conclusions described in the separate Board Consideration sections within this shareholder report, the Boards unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and to each Sub-Adviser under each of the Interim Advisory Agreements was reasonable, and approved the Interim Advisory Agreements.

Wells Fargo Asset Allocation Fund  |  47


For more information
More information about Wells Fargo Funds is available free upon request. To obtain literature, please write, visit the Fund's website, or call:
Wells Fargo Funds
P.O. Box 219967
Kansas City, MO 64121-9967
Website: wfam.com
Individual investors: 1-800-222-8222
Retail investment professionals: 1-888-877-9275
Institutional investment professionals: 1-866-765-0778
This report and the financial statements contained herein are submitted for the general information of the shareholders of the Fund. If this report is used for promotional purposes, distribution of the report must be accompanied or preceded by a current prospectus. Before investing, please consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of the investment. For a current prospectus and, if available, a summary prospectus, containing this information, call 1-800-222-8222 or visit the Fund's website at wfam.com. Read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) is the trade name for certain investment advisory/management firms owned by Wells Fargo & Company. These firms include but are not limited to Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC. Certain products managed by WFAM entities are distributed by Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC (a broker-dealer and Member FINRA).
This material is for general informational and educational purposes only and is NOT intended to provide investment advice or a recommendation of any kind - including a recommendation for any specific investment, strategy, or plan.
 INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED  ■  NO BANK GUARANTEE  ■  MAY LOSE VALUE 
© 2021 Wells Fargo & Company. All rights reserved.
PAR-0621-00522 07-21
A224/AR224 05-21


Annual Report
May 31, 2021
Wells Fargo
Growth Balanced Fund




Contents
 
Reduce clutter.
Save trees.
Sign up for electronic delivery of prospectuses and shareholder reports at wellsfargo.com/ advantagedelivery
The views expressed and any forward-looking statements are as of May 31, 2021, unless otherwise noted, and are those of the Fund's portfolio managers and/or Wells Fargo Asset Management. Discussions of individual securities or the markets generally are not intended as individual recommendations. Future events or results may vary significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. The views expressed are subject to change at any time in response to changing circumstances in the market. Wells Fargo Asset Management and the Fund disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any views expressed or forward-looking statements.
 INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED  ■  NO BANK GUARANTEE  ■  MAY LOSE VALUE 

Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund  |  1


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
Andrew Owen
President
Wells Fargo Funds
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to offer you this annual report for the Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021. Despite the initial challenges presented by the spread of COVID-19 cases and the business restrictions implemented throughout much of the world, global stocks showed robust returns, supported by global stimulus programs, a rapid vaccination rollout, and recovering consumer and corporate sentiment. Bond markets mostly produced positive returns, as investors searched for yield and diversification during difficult market stretches.
For the 12-month period, equities had robust returns, as policymakers continued to fight the effects of COVID-19. Emerging market stocks led both non-U.S. developed market equities and U.S. stocks. Gains by fixed-income securities were varied, though mostly positive. For the period, U.S. stocks, based on the S&P 500 Index,1 gained 40.32%. International stocks, as measured by the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net),2 returned 42.78%, while the MSCI EM Index (Net),3 had stronger performance, with a 51.00% gain. Among bond indexes, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index,4 returned -0.40%, the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (unhedged),5 gained 7.84%, the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index,6 returned 4.74%, and the ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index,7 returned 15.18%.
The COVID-19 lockdown began over a year ago.
By June, economies started to reopen and global central banks committed to do all they could to provide economic support through liquidity and low borrowing costs. U.S. economic activity was aided by one-time $1,200 stimulus checks and $600 weekly bonus unemployment benefits that lasted through July. However, unemployment remained historically high and COVID-19 cases began to increase by late June. China’s economic recovery began to pick up momentum.
July was broadly positive for equities and fixed income. However, economic data and a resurgence of COVID-19 cases underscored the urgent need to regain control of the pandemic. Second-quarter gross domestic product (GDP) shrank from the previous quarter by 9.5% and 12.1% in the U.S. and the eurozone, respectively. In contrast, China’s second-quarter GDP grew 3.2% year over year. The U.S. economy added 1.8 million jobs in July, but a double-digit jobless rate persisted.

1 The S&P 500 Index consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. It is a market-value-weighted index with each stock's weight in the index proportionate to its market value. You cannot invest directly in an index.
2 The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) All Country World Index (ACWI) ex USA Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed and emerging markets, excluding the United States. Source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI. You cannot invest directly in an index.
3 The MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure equity market performance of emerging markets. You cannot invest directly in an index.
4 The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based benchmark that measures the investment-grade, U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage pass-throughs), asset-backed securities, and commercial mortgage-backed securities. You cannot invest directly in an index.
5 The Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (unhedged) is an unmanaged index that provides a broad-based measure of the global investment-grade fixed-income markets excluding the U.S. dollar-denominated debt market. You cannot invest directly in an index.
6 The Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index composed of long-term tax-exempt bonds with a minimum credit rating of Baa. You cannot invest directly in an index.
7 The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index of domestic and Yankee high-yield bonds. The index tracks the performance of high-yield securities traded in the U.S. bond market. You cannot invest directly in an index. Copyright 2021. ICE Data Indices, LLC. All rights reserved.

2  |  Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
The stock market continued to rally in August despite concerns over rising numbers of U.S. and European COVID-19 cases as well as the July expiration of the $600 weekly bonus unemployment benefit. Relatively strong second-quarter earnings boosted investor sentiment along with the U.S. Federal Reserve Board’s (Fed’s) announcement of a monetary policy shift expected to support longer-term low interest rates. U.S. manufacturing and services activity indexes beat expectations while the U.S. housing market maintained strength. In Europe, retail sales expanded and consumer confidence was steady. China’s economy continued to expand.
Stocks grew more volatile in September on mixed economic data. U.S. economic activity continued to grow. However, U.S. unemployment remained elevated at 7.9% in September. With the U.S. Congress delaying further fiscal relief and uncertainties surrounding a possible vaccine, doubts crept back into the financial markets. In the U.K., a lack of progress in Brexit talks weighed on markets. China’s economy picked up steam, fueled by increased global demand.
In October, capital markets stepped back from their six-month rally. Market volatility rose in advance of the U.S. election and amid a global increase in COVID-19 infections. Europe introduced tighter restrictions affecting economic activity. U.S. markets looked favorably at the prospect of Democratic control of the federal purse strings, which could lead to additional fiscal stimulus and a boost to economic activity. Meanwhile, China reported 4.9% third-quarter GDP growth.
Global stocks rallied in November, propelled by optimism over three promising COVID-19 vaccines. Reversing recent trends, value stocks outperformed growth stocks and cyclical stocks outpaced information technology (IT) stocks. However, U.S. unemployment remained elevated, with a net job loss of 10 million since February. The eurozone services Purchasing Managers' Index, a monthly survey of purchasing managers, contracted sharply while the region’s manufacturing activity grew. The U.S. election results added to the upbeat mood as investors anticipated more consistent policies in the new administration.
Financial markets ended the year with strength on high expectations for a rapid rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines, the successful passage of a $900 billion stimulus package, and rising expectations of additional economic support from a Democratic-led Congress. U.S. economic data were mixed with still-elevated unemployment and weak retail sales but growth in manufacturing output. In contrast, China’s economic expansion continued in both manufacturing and nonmanufacturing. U.S. COVID-19 infection rates continued to rise even as new state and local lockdown measures were implemented.
The calendar year 2021 began with emerging market stocks leading all major asset classes in January, driven by China’s strong economic growth and a broad recovery in corporate earnings, which propelled China’s stock market higher. In the U.S., positive news on vaccine trials and January expansion in both the manufacturing and services sectors was offset by a weak December monthly jobs report. This was compounded by technical factors as some hedge funds were forced to sell stocks to protect themselves against a well-publicized short squeeze coordinated by a group of retail investors. Eurozone sentiment and economic growth were particularly weak, reflecting the impact of a new lockdown with stricter social distancing along with a slow vaccine rollout.
February saw major domestic equity indexes driven higher on the hope of a new stimulus bill, improving COVID-19 vaccination numbers, and the gradual reopening of the economy. Most S&P 500 companies reported better-than-expected earnings, with positive surprises coming from the financials, IT, health care, and materials sectors. Japan saw its economy strengthen as a result of strong export numbers. Meanwhile, crude oil prices continued their climb, rising more than 25% for the year. Domestic government bonds experienced a sharp sell-off in late February as markets priced in a more robust economic recovery and higher future growth and inflation expectations.
Global stocks rallied in November, propelled by optimism over three promising COVID-19 vaccines.

Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund  |  3


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
The passage of the massive domestic stimulus bill highlighted March activity, leading to increased forecasts for U.S. growth in 2021.
The passage of the massive domestic stimulus bill highlighted March activity, leading to increased forecasts for U.S. growth in 2021. Domestic employment surged as COVID-19 vaccinations and an increasingly open economy spurred hiring. A majority of U.S. small companies reported they were operating at pre-pandemic capacity or higher. Value stocks continued its outperformance of growth stocks in the month, continuing the trend that started in late 2020. Meanwhile, most major developed global equity indexes were up month to date on the back of rising optimism regarding the outlook for global growth. While the U.S. and U.K. have been the most successful in terms of the vaccine rollout, even in markets where the vaccine has lagged, such as in the eurozone and Japan, equity indexes in many of those countries have also been in positive territory this year.
Equity markets produced another strong showing in April. Domestically, the continued reopening of the economy had a strong impact on positive equity performance, as people started leaving their households and jobless claims continued to fall. Domestic corporate bonds performed well and the U.S. dollar weakened. Meanwhile, the U.S. government continued to seek to invest in the recovery, this time by outlining a package of over $2 billion to improve infrastructure. The primary headwind in April was inflation, as investors tried to determine the breadth and longevity of recent price increases. Developed Europe has been supported by a meaningful increase in the pace of vaccinations. Unfortunately many emerging market countries have not been as successful. India in particular has seen COVID-19 cases surge, serving as an example of the need to get vaccinations rolled out to less developed nations.
Vaccine rollouts continued in May, leading to loosened restrictions globally. As a result, equity markets in general saw a minor increase in returns. Concerns that the continued economic rebound could result in inflation increases becoming more than transitory were supported by the higher input costs businesses are experiencing. Meanwhile, those inflation concerns were tempered by the Fed, which stayed steady on its view of the economy and eased fears of a sudden and substantial policy change. Positive performance in the emerging market equity space was supported this month by steady consumer demand and strong commodity prices. Fixed-income markets were also slightly positive for the month, driven by inflation uncertainty and a softer U.S. dollar.
Don’t let short-term uncertainty derail long-term investment goals.
Periods of investment uncertainty can present challenges, but experience has taught us that maintaining long-term investment goals can be an effective way to plan for the future. Although diversification cannot guarantee an investment profit or prevent losses, we believe it can be an effective way to manage investment risk and potentially smooth out overall portfolio performance. We encourage investors to know their investments and to understand that appropriate levels of risk-taking may unlock opportunities.
Thank you for choosing to invest with Wells Fargo Funds. We appreciate your confidence in us and remain committed to helping you meet your financial needs.
Sincerely,
Andrew Owen
President
Wells Fargo Funds

For further information about your Fund, contact your investment professional, visit our website at wfam.com, or call us directly at 1-800-222-8222.

4  |  Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
Preparing for LIBOR Transition
The global financial industry is preparing to transition away from the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), a key benchmark interest rate, to new alternative rates. LIBOR underpins more than $350 trillion of financial contracts. It is the benchmark rate for a wide spectrum of products ranging from residential mortgages to corporate bonds to derivatives. Regulators have called for a market-wide transition away from LIBOR to successor reference rates by the end of 2021 (expected to be extended through June 30, 2023 for most tenors of the U.S. dollar LIBOR), which requires proactive steps be taken by issuers, counterparties, and asset managers to identify impacted products and adopt new reference rates.
The Fund invests in at least one underlying fund that holds one or more securities that use LIBOR as a floating reference rate and has a maturity date after December 31, 2021.
Although the transition process away from LIBOR has become increasingly well-defined in advance of the anticipated discontinuation date, there remains uncertainty regarding the nature of successor reference rates, and any potential effects of the transition away from LIBOR on investment instruments that use it as a benchmark rate. The transition process may result in, among other things, increased volatility or illiquidity in markets for instruments that currently rely on LIBOR and could negatively impact the value of certain instruments held by the Fund.
Wells Fargo Asset Management is monitoring LIBOR exposure closely and has put resources and controls in place to manage this transition effectively. The Fund’s portfolio management team is evaluating LIBOR holdings to understand what happens to those securities when LIBOR ceases to exist, including examining security documentation to identify the presence or absence of fallback language identifying a replacement rate to LIBOR.
While the pace of transition away from LIBOR will differ by asset class and investment strategy, the portfolio management team will monitor market conditions for those holdings to identify and mitigate deterioration or volatility in pricing and liquidity and ensure appropriate actions are taken in a timely manner.
Further information regarding the potential risks associated with the discontinuation of LIBOR can be found in the Fund’s Statement of Additional Information.

Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund  |  5


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Investment objective The Fund seeks total return, consisting of capital appreciation and current income.
Manager Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC
Subadviser Wells Capital Management Incorporated
Portfolio managers Kandarp R. Acharya, CFA®, FRM, Petros N. Bocray, CFA®, FRM, Christian L. Chan, CFA®
    
Average annual total returns (%) as of May 31, 2021
    Including sales charge   Excluding sales charge   Expense ratios1 (%)
  Inception date 1 year 5 year 10 year   1 year 5 year 10 year   Gross Net 2
Class A (WFGBX) 10-14-1998 21.87 9.17 8.26   29.31 10.47 8.90   1.41 1.13
Class C (WFGWX) 10-1-1998 27.35 9.65 8.09   28.35 9.65 8.09   2.16 1.88
Administrator Class (NVGBX) 11-11-1994   29.56 10.70 9.15   1.33 0.95
Growth Balanced Blended Index3   26.73 11.26 9.46  
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index4   -0.40 3.25 3.29  
MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net)5   42.78 10.88 5.36  
Russell 3000® Index6   43.91 17.36 14.21  
Figures quoted represent past performance, which is no guarantee of future results, and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder may pay on an investment in a fund. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance shown without sales charges would be lower if sales charges were reflected. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted, which assumes the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. Current month-end performance is available on the Fund’s website, wfam.com.
Please keep in mind that high double-digit returns were primarily achieved during favorable market conditions. You should not expect that such favorable returns can be consistently achieved. A fund’s performance, especially for short time periods, should not be the sole factor in making your investment decision.
Index returns do not include transaction costs associated with buying and selling securities, any mutual fund fees or expenses, or any taxes. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
For Class A shares, the maximum front-end sales charge is 5.75%. For Class C shares, the maximum contingent deferred sales charge is 1.00%. Performance including a contingent deferred sales charge assumes the sales charge for the corresponding time period. Administrator Class shares are sold without a front-end sales charge or contingent deferred sales charge.
1 Reflects the expense ratios as stated in the most recent prospectuses, which include the impact of 0.54% in acquired fund fees and expenses. The expense ratios shown are subject to change and may differ from the annualized expense ratios shown in the financial highlights of this report, which do not include acquired fund fees and expenses.
2 The manager has contractually committed through September 30, 2021, to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers at 1.13% for Class A, 1.88% for Class C, 0.95% for Administrator Class, Brokerage commissions, stamp duty fees, interest, taxes, acquired fund fees and expenses (if any) from funds in which the affiliated master portfolios and funds invest and from money market funds, and extraordinary expenses are excluded from the expense caps. All other acquired fund fees and expenses from the affiliated master portfolios are included in the expense caps. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. Without these caps, the Fund’s returns would have been lower. The expense ratio paid by an investor is the net expense ratio (the total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers) as stated in the prospectuses.
3 Source: Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC. The Growth Balanced Blended Index is composed of 45% of the Russell 3000® Index, 35% of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, and 20% of the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net). Prior to November 30, 2017, the Growth Balanced Blended Index was composed 35% of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, 16.25% of the Russell 1000® Growth Index, 16.25% of the Russell 1000® Value Index, 16.25% of the S&P 500 Index, 9.75% of the MSCI EAFE Index (Net), and 6.50% of the Russell 2000® Index. You cannot invest directly in an index.
4 The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based benchmark that measures the investment-grade, U.S. dollar– denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage pass-throughs), asset-backed securities, and commercial mortgage-backed securities. You cannot invest directly in an index.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.

6  |  Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Growth of $10,000 investment as of May 31, 20211
1 The chart compares the performance of Class A shares for the most recent ten years with the Growth Balanced Blended Index, Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net) and Russell 3000® Index. The chart assumes a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in Class A shares and reflects all operating expenses and assumes the maximum initial sales charge of 5.75%.
Footnotes continued from previous page
5 The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) All Country World Index (ACWI) ex USA Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed and emerging markets, excluding the United States. Source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indexes or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI. You cannot invest directly in an index.
6 The Russell 3000® Index measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization, which represents approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market. You cannot invest directly in an index.
Balanced funds may invest in stocks and bonds. Stock values fluctuate in response to the activities of individual companies and general market and economic conditions. The use of derivatives may reduce returns and/or increase volatility. Certain investment strategies tend to increase the total risk of an investment (relative to the broader market). Bond values fluctuate in response to the financial condition of individual issuers, general market and economic conditions, and changes in interest rates. Changes in market conditions and government policies may lead to periods of heightened volatility in the bond market and reduced liquidity for certain bonds held by the fund. In general, when interest rates rise, bond values fall and investors may lose principal value. Interest rate changes and their impact on the fund and its share price can be sudden and unpredictable. This Fund is exposed to foreign investment risk, mortgage- and asset-backed securities risk, and smaller-company securities risk. Consult the Fund’s prospectus for additional information on these and other risks.

Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund  |  7


Performance highlights (unaudited)
MANAGER'S DISCUSSION
Fund highlights
The Fund outperformed the Growth Balanced Fund Blended Index for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021.
The Tactical Asset Allocation (TAA) overlay and an overweight to credit sectors within the fixed-income portfolio were the largest contributors to relative performance over the period.
Poor relative performance within the international portfolio was the largest detractor from performance over the period.
Stock markets posted remarkable gains as the world recuperated from the pandemic.
The 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021, saw strong results from the broad U.S. equity markets, as illustrated by the Russell 3000® Index’s return of 43.91%. The broad foreign markets also did well, as reflected by the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net)'s return of 42.78%. The broad U.S. fixed-income market, as represented by the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, posted a slightly negative return of -0.40%. However, that result does not show the dichotomy within the fixed-income markets. Long-maturity U.S. Treasury bonds, as captured by the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index *, declined 13.85% as long-term Treasury yields rose over the period. In contrast, high-yield bonds, as shown by the ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index**, advanced 15.18% as credit spreads compressed over the period. Aided by unprecedented levels of monetary and fiscal stimulus, the economy staged an impressive recovery from the pandemic contraction, and risky assets performed very well.
Portfolio management made few changes to the underlying portfolio.
A number of underlying managers are employed within the international equity sleeve of the portfolio, and over the course of the year, two were replaced due to performance considerations. While the rest of the portfolio remained stable, we implemented three tactical allocation adjustments over the year. From May 2020 to November 2020, we held a dedicated position in high-yield bonds, and from September 2020 to May 2021, we held a dedicated position in U.S. industrials sector stocks. In March 2021, we established a position in U.S. energy stocks, and that position was still in effect at the end of the period.
Ten largest holdings (%) as of May 31, 20211
Wells Fargo Managed Fixed Income Portfolio 21.08
Wells Fargo Disciplined U.S. Core Fund Class R6 13.67
Wells Fargo Large Company Value Portfolio 11.77
Wells Fargo Diversified Large Cap Growth Portfolio 10.83
Wells Fargo Disciplined International Developed Markets Portfolio 8.83
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio 6.54
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF 3.98
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio 3.53
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio 3.41
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio 3.30
1 Figures represent the percentage of the Fund's net assets. Holdings are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
The Fund’s TAA overlay was active throughout the year. On the heels of the large pandemic-related equity market sell-off that occurred just prior to the start of the period, we established a number of positions that gave us exposure to risky assets. Over the entire period, TAA activity contributed about 118 basis points (bps; 100 bps equal 1.00%) to performance. At the start of the period, we held a long position in an S&P 500 futures contract along with a paired trade that returned the excess performance of the Nasdaq 100 Index*** over the S&P 500 Index. We closed both of these trades in July 2020. In August 2020, we established a long position in a Nasdaq 100 contract and closed the trade in February 2021. In September 2020, we established a long position in U.S. industrials stocks and sold it in May 2021. In March 2021, we reestablished the long position in the S&P 500 futures contract and it was still in place at the end of the period. While the aforementioned trades contributed to performance, the trades listed below detracted from performance. At the start of the period, we held a short British pound position. We closed this trade in late July 2020.
 

* The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index measures U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate, nominal debt issued by the U.S. Treasury with 20+ years to maturity. Treasury bills are excluded by the maturity constraint, but are part of a separate Short Treasury Index. STRIPS are excluded from the index because their inclusion would result in double-counting. You cannot invest directly in an index.
** The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index of domestic and Yankee high-yield bonds. The index tracks the performance of high-yield securities traded in the U.S. bond market. You cannot invest directly in an index. Copyright 2021. ICE Data Indices, LLC. All rights reserved.

* The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index measures U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate, nominal debt issued by the U.S. Treasury with 20+ years to maturity. Treasury bills are excluded by the maturity constraint, but are part of a separate Short Treasury Index. STRIPS are excluded from the index because their inclusion would result in double-counting. You cannot invest directly in an index.
*** The Nasdaq 100 Index is an unmanaged group of the 100 biggest companies listed on the Nasdaq Composite Index. The list is updated quarterly, and companies on this index are typically representative of technology-related industries, such as computer hardware and software products, telecommunications, biotechnology, and retail/wholesale trade. You cannot invest directly in an index.

* The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index measures U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate, nominal debt issued by the U.S. Treasury with 20+ years to maturity. Treasury bills are excluded by the maturity constraint, but are part of a separate Short Treasury Index. STRIPS are excluded from the index because their inclusion would result in double-counting. You cannot invest directly in an index.
The S&P 500 Index consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. It is a market-value-weighted index with each stock's weight in the index proportionate to its market value. You cannot invest directly in an index.

8  |  Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund


Performance highlights (unaudited)
At the start of the period, we also held a paired trade long the S&P 500 futures contract and short the Russell 2000 futures contract. We closed this trade in August 2020. In July 2020, we established another paired trade that was long the S&P 500 futures contract and short the Nikkei futures contract. We closed this trade in November 2020.
Allocation (%) as of May 31, 2021
  Neutral
allocation
Effective
allocation1
Bonds 35 29
Stocks 65 69
Effective Cash 0 2
1 Effective allocation includes the effect of any tactical futures overlay that may be in place. Effective cash, if any, represents the net offset to such future positions. These amounts are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
In a relative basis, the majority of the underlying sleeves did well over the period. The largest core bond manager was overweight credit with respect to Treasury bonds. As Treasury bonds performed poorly over the period, this portfolio had the largest positive contribution to relative performance over the trailing 12 months. Our U.S. equity managers, particularly in the value and in the small-cap space, also added to performance on a relative basis. Managers in the international space had a slight detraction from relative performance.
Looking ahead, we are guardedly optimistic.
The massive amount of uncertainty we faced last year at this time has faded. While the daunting impacts of the virus, U.S. civil unrest, domestic politics, and geopolitical tensions are still very fresh in our mind’s eye, we increasingly see these issues in the rear-view mirror. The rollout of the vaccine, the reduction of political rhetoric, and a very accommodative Federal Reserve Board (Fed) have all helped calm fears. While COVID-19 cases are declining and America is returning to work, we are focused on understanding the economic impacts of the recent unprecedented monetary and fiscal policy effects on the portfolio. While we expect equity markets will continue to advance over the next 12 months, it may be at a much slower pace than over the past 12 months. We believe there are new risks around the corner. We are very concerned about future inflation and we are not fully convinced it is transitory in nature. The U.S. Treasury is issuing a large quantity of bonds, the Fed is purchasing a large quantity of bonds, and we continue to monitor closely the duration and credit composition of our fixed-income investments. There are many unknowns, and despite some optimism, we continue to monitor the situation very carefully.
 

Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund  |  9


Fund expenses (unaudited)
As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and contingent deferred sales charges (if any) on redemptions and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) and/or shareholder servicing fees, and other Fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period from December 1, 2020 to May 31, 2021.
Actual expenses
The “Actual” line of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the “Actual” line under the heading entitled “Expenses paid during period” for your applicable class of shares to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes
The “Hypothetical” line of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) and contingent deferred sales charges. Therefore, the “Hypothetical” line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
  Beginning
account value
12-1-2020
Ending
account value
5-31-2021
Expenses
paid during
the period1,2
Annualized net
expense ratio2
Class A        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,123.36 $5.56 1.05%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,019.70 $5.29 1.05%
Class C        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,117.63 $9.50 1.80%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,015.96 $9.05 1.80%
Administrator Class        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,123.85 $4.55 0.86%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,020.64 $4.33 0.86%
1 Expenses paid is equal to the annualized net expense ratio of each class multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one-half-year period).
2 Amounts reflect net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios in which the Fund invests.

10  |  Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Investment companies:  98.07%          
Affiliated master portfolios:  75.42%          
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio                 $   8,429,442
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio                  15,611,577
Wells Fargo Disciplined International Developed Markets Portfolio                  21,060,315
Wells Fargo Diversified Large Cap Growth Portfolio                  25,835,497
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Porfolio                   2,396,132
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio                   3,022,995
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio                   7,877,020
Wells Fargo Large Company Value Portfolio                  28,082,996
Wells Fargo Managed Fixed Income Portfolio                  50,309,508
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio                   8,125,110
Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio                   2,632,850
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio                   6,595,822
          179,979,264
Exchange-traded funds:  6.45%          
Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund          42,170   2,201,696
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF         123,608   9,493,094
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF          32,332   3,703,631
           15,398,421
Stock funds:  16.20%          
Wells Fargo Disciplined U.S. Core Fund Class R6       1,451,853  32,623,137
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6          83,344   2,962,887
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund Class R6         227,861   3,069,290
          38,655,314
Total Investment companies (Cost $184,927,594)         234,032,999
Total investments in securities (Cost $184,927,594) 98.07%       234,032,999
Other assets and liabilities, net 1.93       4,597,307
Total net assets 100.00%       $238,630,306
    
The issuer is an affiliate of the Fund as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund  |  11


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

Investments in affiliates
An affiliated investment is an investment in which the Fund owns at least 5% of the outstanding voting shares of the issuer or as a result of other relationships, such as the Fund and the issuer having the same adviser or investment manager. Transactions with issuers that were either affiliates of the Fund at the beginning of the period or the end of the period were as follows:
  Value,
beginning of
period
Purchases Sales
proceeds
Net
realized
gains
(losses) on
affiliated
Underlying
Funds
  Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses) on
affiliated
Underlying
Funds
  Value,
end of
period
  % of
net
assets
Investment companies                    
Stock funds                    
Wells Fargo Disciplined U.S. Core Fund Class R6 $22,208,533 $10,348,311 $(6,252,835) $ 249,164   $ 6,069,964   $ 32,623,137    
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6 2,760,102 28,366 (979,130) 263,065   890,484   2,962,887    
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund Class R6 2,689,475 92,754 (818,580) 88,526   1,017,115   3,069,290    
        $600,755   $7,977,563   $38,655,314   16.20%
    
  Shares,
end of
period
Dividends from
affiliated
Underlying Funds
  Net realized gains
on capital gain
distributions
from affiliated
Underlying Funds
Investment companies        
Stock funds        
Wells Fargo Disciplined U.S. Core Fund Class R6 1,451,853 $ 552,955   $ 1,778,501
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6 83,344 12,611   0
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund Class R6 227,861 76,999   0
    $642,565   $1,778,501
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

12  |  Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

Transactions with the affiliated Master Portfolios were as follows:
  % of
ownership,
beginning
of period
% of
ownership,
end of
period
Net realized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Interest
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Dividends
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Affiliated
income
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Value,
end of
period
  % of
net
assets
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio 2.20% 2.05% $ 873,948   $ 2,195,146   $ 0   $ 122,607   $ 130   $ 8,429,442    
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio 0.23 0.28 333,941   (436,036)   222,815   0   419   15,611,577    
Wells Fargo Disciplined International Developed Markets Portfolio 10.20 10.29 4,311,293   1,805,815   0   526,977   5,840   21,060,315    
Wells Fargo Diversified Large Cap Growth Portfolio 8.84 9.05 3,970,463   2,382,672   0   158,824   803   25,835,497    
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Porfolio 0.33 0.25 711,625   392,424   0   2,993   739   2,396,132    
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio 1.38 1.67 360,972   535,510   0   74,724   34   3,022,995    
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio 0.00 1.11 618,727   1,337,677   0   190,691   0   7,877,020    
Wells Fargo High Yield Corporate Bond Portfolio 7.51 0.00 441,238   156,428   350,906   0   57   0    
Wells Fargo International Value Portfolio 2.59 0.00 (741,067)   5,348,396   0   409,811   3,191   0    
Wells Fargo Large Company Value Portfolio 9.50 9.70 9,754,257   (587,575)   0   446,311   351   28,082,996    
Wells Fargo Managed Fixed Income Portfolio 9.86 10.14 755,800   (768,063)   1,322,294   0   1,188   50,309,508    
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio 4.38 3.39 101,233   395,891   192,719   23,327   78   8,125,110    
Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio 0.17 0.19 705,202   408,221   0   11,021   231   2,632,850    
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio 1.43 1.06 783,651   2,844,931   0   90,055   583   6,595,822    
      $22,981,283   $16,011,437   $2,088,734   $2,057,341   $13,644   $179,979,264   75.42%
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund  |  13


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

Futures contracts
Description Number of
contracts
Expiration
date
Notional
cost
Notional
value
Unrealized
gains
  Unrealized
losses
Long              
Bloomberg Commodity Index 312 6-16-2021 $ 2,849,474 $ 2,892,240 $ 42,766   $ 0
E-Mini S&P 500 Index 29 6-18-2021 6,120,101 6,093,480 0   (26,621)
FTSE 100 Index 36 6-18-2021 3,586,062 3,592,185 6,123   0
IBEX 35 Index 95 6-18-2021 10,589,883 10,611,498 21,615   0
MSCI Emerging Markets Index 35 6-18-2021 2,335,818 2,381,575 45,757   0
Short              
Australian Dollars Futures (91) 6-14-2021 (7,030,092) (7,019,740) 10,352   0
Mini-DAX Futures (110) 6-18-2021 (9,780,973) (10,366,953) 0   (585,980)
10-Year U.S. Treasury Notes (87) 9-21-2021 (11,444,377) (11,478,563) 0   (34,186)
          $126,613   $(646,787)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

14  |  Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund


Statement of assets and liabilities—May 31, 2021
   
Assets  
Investments in affiliated Master Portfolios, at value (cost $139,610,508)

$ 179,979,264
Investments in unaffiliated Underlying Funds, at value (cost $15,266,721)

15,398,421
Investments in affiliated Underlying Funds, at value (cost $30,050,365)

38,655,314
Cash

108,803
Cash at broker segregated for futures contracts

4,696,894
Receivable for Fund shares sold

28,689
Receivable for investments sold

3,211
Prepaid expenses and other assets

3,048
Total assets

238,873,644
Liabilities  
Management fee payable

56,317
Shareholder servicing fees payable

50,106
Administration fees payable

32,437
Payable for Fund shares redeemed

25,439
Shareholder report expenses payable

24,067
Payable for daily variation margin on open futures contracts

13,470
Distribution fee payable

6,068
Accrued expenses and other liabilities

35,434
Total liabilities

243,338
Total net assets

$238,630,306
Net assets consist of  
Paid-in capital

$ 171,186,111
Total distributable earnings

67,444,195
Total net assets

$238,630,306
Computation of net asset value and offering price per share  
Net assets – Class A

$ 83,101,998
Shares outstanding – Class A1

1,473,615
Net asset value per share – Class A

$56.39
Maximum offering price per share – Class A2

$59.83
Net assets – Class C

$ 9,588,497
Shares outstanding – Class C1

199,852
Net asset value per share – Class C

$47.98
Net assets – Administrator Class

$ 145,939,811
Shares outstanding – Administrator Class1

2,961,248
Net asset value per share – Administrator Class

$49.28
1 The Fund has an unlimited number of authorized shares.
2 Maximum offering price is computed as 100/94.25 of net asset value. On investments of $50,000 or more, the offering price is reduced.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund  |  15


Statement of operations—year ended May 31, 2021
   
Investment income  
Interest allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios (net of foreign withholding taxes of $128)

$ 2,088,734
Dividends allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios (net of foreign withholding taxes of $137,143)

2,057,341
Dividends from affiliated Underlying Funds

642,565
Dividends from unaffiliated Underlying Funds

134,324
Affiliated income allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

13,644
Expenses allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

(928,835)
Waivers allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

90,827
Total investment income

4,098,600
Expenses  
Management fee

664,510
Administration fees  
Class A

159,886
Class C

20,295
Administrator Class

176,414
Shareholder servicing fees  
Class A

190,247
Class C

24,131
Administrator Class

338,097
Distribution fee  
Class C

72,392
Custody and accounting fees

12,051
Professional fees

35,365
Registration fees

51,189
Shareholder report expenses

45,584
Trustees’ fees and expenses

21,080
Other fees and expenses

19,860
Total expenses

1,831,101
Less: Fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements  
Fund-level

(369,217)
Class A

(211)
Administrator Class

(156,865)
Net expenses

1,304,808
Net investment income

2,793,792
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments  
Net realized gains on  
Securities transactions allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

22,981,283
Affiliated Underlying Funds

600,755
Unaffiliated securities

2,167,671
Futures contracts

4,143,096
Capital gain distributions from affiliated Underlying Funds

1,778,501
Net realized gains on investments

31,671,306
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on  
Securities transactions allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

16,011,437
Affiliated Underlying Funds

7,977,563
Unaffiliated securities

131,700
Futures contracts

(1,827,045)
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

22,293,655
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

53,964,961
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

$56,758,753
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

16  |  Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund


Statement of changes in net assets
         
  Year ended
May 31, 2021
Year ended
May 31, 2020
Operations        
Net investment income

  $ 2,793,792   $ 3,165,071
Net realized gains on investments

  31,671,306   2,965,059
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

  22,293,655   5,591,889
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

  56,758,753   11,722,019
Distributions to shareholders from        
Net investment income and net realized gains        
Class A

  (4,537,603)   (1,899,671)
Class C

  (577,341)   (252,329)
Administrator Class

  (9,295,207)   (4,326,341)
Total distributions to shareholders

  (14,410,151)   (6,478,341)
Capital share transactions Shares   Shares  
Proceeds from shares sold        
Class A

101,624 5,268,635 130,896 6,205,787
Class C

20,044 915,152 38,064 1,521,837
Administrator Class

157,869 7,209,637 252,894 10,053,081
    13,393,424   17,780,705
Reinvestment of distributions        
Class A

85,990 4,440,603 38,579 1,874,625
Class C

12,805 561,013 5,569 231,803
Administrator Class

205,233 9,281,044 100,724 4,319,406
    14,282,660   6,425,834
Payment for shares redeemed        
Class A

(194,217) (10,010,832) (213,827) (9,907,481)
Class C

(86,892) (3,822,827) (83,327) (3,328,464)
Administrator Class

(574,313) (25,780,552) (656,994) (27,048,981)
    (39,614,211)   (40,284,926)
Net decrease in net assets resulting from capital share transactions

  (11,938,127)   (16,078,387)
Total increase (decrease) in net assets

  30,410,475   (10,834,709)
Net assets        
Beginning of period

  208,219,831   219,054,540
End of period

  $238,630,306   $208,219,831
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund  |  17


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class A 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$46.33 $45.15 $47.12 $43.91 $39.99
Net investment income

0.61 1 0.65 1 0.72 1 0.53 0.41
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

12.62 1.80 (0.60) 3.13 3.93
Total from investment operations

13.23 2.45 0.12 3.66 4.34
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.50) (0.47) (1.26) (0.45) (0.42)
Net realized gains

(2.67) (0.80) (0.83) 0.00 0.00
Total distributions to shareholders

(3.17) (1.27) (2.09) (0.45) (0.42)
Net asset value, end of period

$56.39 $46.33 $45.15 $47.12 $43.91
Total return2

29.31% 5.31% 0.53% 8.34% 10.93%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

1.22% 1.32% 1.33% 1.35% 1.34%
Net expenses

1.05% 1.04% 1.07% 1.17% 1.20%
Net investment income

1.18% 1.40% 1.55% 1.27% 1.10%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate3

140% 116% 149% 114% 114%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$83,102 $68,581 $68,832 $62,473 $65,514
    
* Ratios include only the net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios and do not include expenses from any other affiliated Underlying Funds. Net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios included in the ratios were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.38%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.45%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.47%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.51%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.50%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges.
3 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the Fund’s ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. These purchases and sales amounts are aggregated with the direct purchases and sales in the affiliated Underlying Funds and unaffiliated securities and included in the portfolio turnover calculation.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

18  |  Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class C 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$39.81 $38.95 $40.86 $38.14 $34.82
Net investment income

0.19 1 0.26 1 0.37 1 0.14 0.13 1
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

10.80 1.54 (0.56) 2.74 3.38
Total from investment operations

10.99 1.80 (0.19) 2.88 3.51
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.15) (0.14) (0.89) (0.16) (0.19)
Net realized gains

(2.67) (0.80) (0.83) 0.00 0.00
Total distributions to shareholders

(2.82) (0.94) (1.72) (0.16) (0.19)
Net asset value, end of period

$47.98 $39.81 $38.95 $40.86 $38.14
Total return2

28.35% 4.52% (0.23)% 7.55% 10.10%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

1.97% 2.07% 2.08% 2.10% 2.09%
Net expenses

1.80% 1.79% 1.82% 1.92% 1.95%
Net investment income

0.43% 0.64% 0.93% 0.52% 0.35%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate3

140% 116% 149% 114% 114%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$9,588 $10,108 $11,434 $16,649 $16,463
    
* Ratios include only the net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios and do not include expenses from any other affiliated Underlying Funds. Net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios included in the ratios were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.38%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.45%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.48%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.51%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.50%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges.
3 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the Fund’s ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. These purchases and sales amounts are aggregated with the direct purchases and sales in the affiliated Underlying Funds and unaffiliated securities and included in the portfolio turnover calculation.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund  |  19


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Administrator Class 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$40.83 $39.93 $42.04 $39.22 $35.78
Net investment income

0.68 0.84 1.05 0.75 0.50 1
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

11.03 1.41 (0.90) 2.63 3.47
Total from investment operations

11.71 2.25 0.15 3.38 3.97
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.59) (0.55) (1.43) (0.56) (0.53)
Net realized gains

(2.67) (0.80) (0.83) 0.00 0.00
Total distributions to shareholders

(3.26) (1.35) (2.26) (0.56) (0.53)
Net asset value, end of period

$49.28 $40.83 $39.93 $42.04 $39.22
Total return

29.56% 5.51% 0.70% 8.63% 11.19%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

1.14% 1.24% 1.25% 1.27% 1.26%
Net expenses

0.86% 0.86% 0.89% 0.92% 0.95%
Net investment income

1.37% 1.57% 1.72% 1.51% 1.34%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate2

140% 116% 149% 114% 114%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$145,940 $129,531 $138,788 $157,889 $162,693
    
* Ratios include only the net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios and do not include expenses from any other affiliated Underlying Funds. Net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios included in the ratios were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.38%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.45%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.47%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.51%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.50%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the Fund’s ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. These purchases and sales amounts are aggregated with the direct purchases and sales in the affiliated Underlying Funds and unaffiliated securities and included in the portfolio turnover calculation.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

20  |  Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund


Notes to financial statements
1. ORGANIZATION
Wells Fargo Funds Trust (the "Trust"), a Delaware statutory trust organized on March 10, 1999, is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). As an investment company, the Trust follows the accounting and reporting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, Financial Services – Investment Companies. These financial statements report on the Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund (the "Fund") which is a diversified series of the Trust.
The Fund is a fund-of-funds that invests in various affiliated mutual funds (“Underlying Funds”) employing a multi-asset, multi-style investment approach designed to reduce the price and return volatility of the Fund and to provide more consistent returns. The Fund may also invest directly in securities. The Underlying Funds incur separate expenses in seeking to achieve their investment objectives. Investments in affiliated Underlying Funds may also include investments in one or more separate diversified portfolios (collectively, the “affiliated Master Portfolios”) of Wells Fargo Master Trust, a registered open-end management investment company. Each affiliated Master Portfolio directly acquires portfolio securities and the Fund acquires an indirect interest in those securities. The Fund accounts for its investments in the affiliated Master Portfolios as partnership investments and records on a daily basis its share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s income, expense and realized and unrealized gains and losses. The financial statements of the affiliated Master Portfolios are presented in separate financial statements and may be obtained free of charge by contacting Investor Services or by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov. The financial statements of the affiliated Master Portfolios are filed with the SEC under Wells Fargo Master Trust. The financial statements for all other affiliated Underlying Funds are also publicly available on the SEC website at sec.gov.
On February 23, 2021, Wells Fargo & Company announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management ("WFAM") to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. WFAM is the trade name used by the asset management businesses of Wells Fargo & Company and includes Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the investment manager to the Fund, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, both registered investment advisers providing sub-advisory services to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Fund's principal underwriter. As part of the transaction, Wells Fargo & Company will own a 9.9% equity interest and will continue to serve as an important client and distribution partner.
Consummation of the transaction will result in the automatic termination of the Fund's investment management agreement and subadvisory agreement. The Fund's Board of Trustees approved a new investment management and new subadvisory agreement and approved submitting the agreements to the Fund’s shareholders for approval at a special meeting of shareholders expected to be held on August 16, 2021. Shareholders of record of the Fund at the close of business on May 28, 2021 are entitled to vote at the meeting. If shareholders approve the new agreements, they would take effect upon the closing of the transaction. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
This shareholder report is not asking you for a proxy. A separate proxy statement with more detailed information about the transaction will be provided to Fund shareholders and should be reviewed carefully.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following significant accounting policies, which are consistently followed in the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund, are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Securities valuation
All investments are valued each business day as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4 p.m. Eastern Time), although the Fund may deviate from this calculation time under unusual or unexpected circumstances.
Investments in the affiliated Master Portfolios are valued daily based on each Fund’s proportionate share of each affiliated Master Portfolio’s net assets, which are also valued daily.
Equity securities and futures contracts that are listed on a foreign or domestic exchange or market are valued at the official closing price or, if none, the last sales price. If no sale occurs on the principal exchange or market that day, a fair value price will be determined in accordance with the Fund’s Valuation Procedures.
Investments in underlying mutual funds are valued at net asset per share as reported by the Underlying Funds as of the close of the regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange on each day the exchange is open for trading.

Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund  |  21


Notes to financial statements
Investments which are not valued using any of the methods discussed above are valued at their fair value, as determined in good faith by the Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees has established a Valuation Committee comprised of the Trustees and has delegated to it the authority to take any actions regarding the valuation of portfolio securities that the Valuation Committee deems necessary or appropriate, including determining the fair value of portfolio securities, unless the determination has been delegated to the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee at Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC ("Funds Management"). The Board of Trustees retains the authority to make or ratify any valuation decisions or approve any changes to the Valuation Procedures as it deems appropriate. On a quarterly basis, the Board of Trustees receives reports on any valuation actions taken by the Valuation Committee or the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee which may include items for ratification.
Futures contracts
Futures contracts are agreements between the Fund and a counterparty to buy or sell a specific amount of a commodity, financial instrument or currency at a specified price on a specified date. The Fund may buy and sell futures contracts in order to gain exposure to, or protect against, changes in interest rates, security values and foreign exchange rates and is subject to interest rate risk, equity price risk and foreign currency risk. The primary risks associated with the use of futures contracts are the imperfect correlation between changes in market values of securities held by the Fund and the prices of futures contracts, and the possibility of an illiquid market. Futures contracts are generally entered into on a regulated futures exchange and cleared through a clearinghouse associated with the exchange. With futures contracts, there is minimal counterparty risk to the Fund since futures contracts are exchange traded and the exchange’s clearinghouse, as the counterparty to all exchange traded futures, guarantees the futures contracts against default.
Upon entering into a futures contract, the Fund is required to deposit either cash or securities (initial margin) with the broker in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the contract value. Subsequent payments (variation margin) are paid to or from the broker each day equal to the daily changes in the contract value. Such payments are recorded as unrealized gains or losses and, if any, shown as variation margin receivable (payable) in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Should the Fund fail to make requested variation margin payments, the broker can gain access to the initial margin to satisfy the Fund’s payment obligations. When the contracts are closed, a realized gain or loss is recorded in the Statement of Operations.
Investment transactions, income and expenses
Investments in the affiliated Master Portfolios are recorded on a trade date basis. The Fund records daily its proportionate share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s income, expenses and realized and unrealized gains or losses. The Fund also accrues its own expenses.
Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains or losses are recorded on the basis of identified cost.
Income dividends and capital gain distributions from investment companies are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Capital gain distributions from investment companies are treated as realized gains.
Distributions to shareholders
Distributions to shareholders from net investment income and any net realized gains are recorded on the ex-dividend date and paid at least annually. Such distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations and may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Dividend sources are estimated at the time of declaration. The tax character of distributions is determined as of the Fund's fiscal year end. Therefore, a portion of the Fund's distributions made prior to the Fund’s fiscal year end may be categorized as a tax return of capital at year end.
Federal and other taxes
The Fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by distributing substantially all of its investment company taxable income and any net realized capital gains (after reduction for capital loss carryforwards) sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes. Accordingly, no provision for federal income taxes was required.
The Fund’s income and federal excise tax returns and all financial records supporting those returns for the prior three fiscal years are subject to examination by the federal and Delaware revenue authorities. Management has analyzed the Fund's tax positions taken on federal, state, and foreign tax returns for all open tax years and does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability.

22  |  Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund


Notes to financial statements
As of May 31, 2021, the aggregate cost of all investments for federal income tax purposes was $185,175,031 and the unrealized gains (losses) consisted of:
Gross unrealized gains $48,388,815
Gross unrealized losses (51,021)
Net unrealized gains $48,337,794
Reclassifications are made to the Fund’s capital accounts for permanent tax differences to reflect income and gains available for distribution (or available capital loss carryforwards) under federal income tax regulations. U.S. generally accepted accounting principles require that certain components of net assets be adjusted to reflect permanent differences between financial and tax reporting. These reclassifications have no effect on net assets or net asset values per share. The primary permanent difference causing such reclassification is due to recognition of partnership income. At May 31, 2021, as a result of permanent book-to-tax differences, the following reclassification adjustments were made on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities:
Paid-in capital Total distributable
earnings
$(1,105,150) $1,105,150
Class allocations
The separate classes of shares offered by the Fund differ principally in applicable sales charges, distribution, shareholder servicing, and administration fees. Class specific expenses are charged directly to that share class. Investment income, common fund-level expenses, and realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative proportion of net assets of each class.
3. FAIR VALUATION MEASUREMENTS
Fair value measurements of investments are determined within a framework that has established a fair value hierarchy based upon the various data inputs utilized in determining the value of the Fund’s investments. The three-level hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The Fund’s investments are classified within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The inputs are summarized into three broad levels as follows:
Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical securities
Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs or methodologies used for valuing investments in securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.

Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund  |  23


Notes to financial statements
The following is a summary of the inputs used in valuing the Fund’s assets and liabilities as of May 31, 2021:
  Quoted prices
(Level 1)
Other significant
observable inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
unobservable inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Assets        
Investments in:        
Investment companies $ 54,053,735 $0 $0 $ 54,053,735
Investments measured at net asset value*       179,979,264
  54,053,735 0 0 234,032,999
Futures contracts 126,613 0 0 126,613
Total assets $54,180,348 $0 $0 $234,159,612
Liabilities        
Futures contracts $ 646,787 $0 $0 $ 646,787
Total liabilities $ 646,787 $0 $0 $ 646,787
    
* Investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amount presented in the table is intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The Fund’s investments in the affiliated Master Portfolios are valued at $179,979,264. Each affiliated Master Portfolio does not have a redemption period notice, can be redeemed daily and does not have any unfunded commitments.
Futures contracts are reported at their cumulative unrealized gains (losses) at measurement date as reported in the table following the Portfolio of Investments. For futures contracts, the current day’s variation margin is reported on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. All other assets and liabilities are reported at their market value at measurement date.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the Fund did not have any transfers into/out of Level 3.
The investment objective of each affiliated Master Portfolio is as follows:
Affiliated Master Portfolio Investment objective
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio Seeks maximum long-term total return (current income and capital appreciation), consistent with minimizing risk to principal
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio Seeks total return, consisting of income and capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Disciplined International Developed Markets Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Diversified Large Cap Growth Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Large Company Value Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Managed Fixed Income Portfolio Seeks consistent fixed-income returns
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio Seeks returns that exceed the rate of inflation over the long-term
Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
4. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
Management fee
Funds Management, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company ("Wells Fargo"), is the manager of the Fund and provides advisory and fund-level administrative services under an investment management agreement. Under the investment management agreement, Funds Management is responsible for, among other services, implementing the

24  |  Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund


Notes to financial statements
investment objectives and strategies of the Fund, supervising the subadviser and providing fund-level administrative services in connection with the Fund’s operations. As compensation for its services under the investment management agreement, Funds Management is entitled to receive a management fee at the following annual rate based on the Fund’s average daily net assets:
Average daily net assets Management fee
First $500 million 0.300%
Next $500 million 0.280
Next $2 billion 0.260
Next $2 billion 0.240
Next $5 billion 0.230
Over $10 billion 0.220
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the management fee was equivalent to an annual rate of 0.30% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
Funds Management has retained the services of a subadviser to provide daily portfolio management to the Fund. The fee for subadvisory services is borne by Funds Management. Wells Capital Management Incorporated ("WellsCap"), an affiliate of Funds Management and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo, is the subadviser to the Fund and is entitled to receive a fee from Funds Management at an annual rate starting at 0.10% and declining to 0.05% as the average daily net assets of the Fund increase.
Funds Management also serves as the adviser to each affiliated Master Portfolio and is entitled to receive a fee from each affiliated Master Portfolio for those services.
Administration fees
Under a class-level administration agreement, Funds Management provides class-level administrative services to the Fund, which includes paying fees and expenses for services provided by the transfer agent, sub-transfer agents, omnibus account servicers and record-keepers. As compensation for its services under the class-level administration agreement, Funds Management receives an annual fee which is calculated based on the average daily net assets of each class as follows:
  Class-level
administration fee
Class A 0.21%
Class C 0.21
Administrator Class 0.13
Waivers and/or expense reimbursements
Funds Management has contractually waived and/or reimbursed management and administration fees to the extent necessary to maintain certain net operating expense ratios for the Fund. When each class of the Fund has exceeded its expense cap, Funds Management has waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses from fund-level expenses on a proportionate basis and then from class specific expenses. When only certain classes exceed their expense caps, waivers and/or reimbursements are applied against class specific expenses before fund-level expenses. Net expenses from the affiliated Master Portfolios are included in the expense caps. Funds Management has committed through September 30, 2021 to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap expenses. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. The contractual expense caps are as follows:
  Expense ratio caps
Class A 1.13%
Class C 1.88
Administrator Class 0.95

Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund  |  25


Notes to financial statements
Distribution fee
The Trust has adopted a distribution plan for Class C shares of the Fund pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. A distribution fee is charged to Class C shares and paid to Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC ("Funds Distributor"), the principal underwriter, at an annual rate of 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class C shares.
In addition, Funds Distributor is entitled to receive the front-end sales charge from the purchase of Class A shares and a contingent deferred sales charge on the redemption of certain Class A shares. Funds Distributor is also entitled to receive the contingent deferred sales charges from redemptions of Class C shares. For the year ended May 31, 2021, Funds Distributor received $5,718 from the sale of Class A shares and $149 in contingent deferred sales charges from redemptions of Class C shares. No contingent deferred sales charges were incurred by Class A shares for the year ended May 31, 2021.
Shareholder servicing fees
The Trust has entered into contracts with one or more shareholder servicing agents, whereby Class A, Class C, and Administrator Class of the Fund are charged a fee at an annual rate of 0.25% of the average daily net assets of each respective class. A portion of these total shareholder servicing fees were paid to affiliates of Wells Fargo.
5. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS
The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing in affiliated Master Portfolios. Purchases and sales related to these investments have been calculated by aggregating the results of multiplying the Fund's ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. Purchase and sales in Underlying Funds and unaffiliated securities in which the Fund invests are actual purchases and sales of those investments. Purchases and sales of investments, excluding short-term securities, for the year ended May 31, 2021 were as follows:
Purchases at cost   Sales proceeds
U.S.
government
Non-U.S.
government
  U.S.
government
Non-U.S.
government
$77,833,651 $221,658,296   $65,221,812 $251,290,285
6. DERIVATIVE TRANSACTIONS
During the year ended May 31, 2021, the Fund entered into futures contracts to gain market exposure to certain asset classes consistent with its asset allocation strategy. The Fund had an average notional amount of $28,651,747 in long futures contracts and $22,670,820 in short futures contracts during the year ended May 31, 2021.
A summary of the location of derivative instruments on the financial statements by primary risk exposure is outlined in the following tables.
The fair value of derivative instruments as of May 31, 2021 by primary risk type was as follows for the Fund:
  Asset derivatives   Liability derivatives
  Statement of
Assets and Liabilities location
Fair value   Statement of
Assets and Liabilities location
Fair value
Interest rate risk Unrealized gains on futures contracts $ 0*   Unrealized losses on futures contracts $ 34,186*
Equity risk Unrealized gains on futures contracts 116,261*   Unrealized losses on futures contracts 612,601*
Foreign currency risk Unrealized gains on futures contracts 10,352*   Unrealized losses on futures contracts 0*
    $126,613     $646,787
    
* Amount represents cumulative unrealized gains (losses) on futures contracts as reported in the table following the Portfolio of Investments. Only the current day’s variation margin as of May 31, 2021 is reported separately on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

26  |  Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund


Notes to financial statements
The effect of derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations for the year ended May 31, 2021 was as follows:
  Amount of realized
gains (losses) on
derivatives
Change in unrealized
gains (losses) on
derivatives
Equity risk $ 4,357,027 $ (1,895,153)
Interest rate risk 332,774 (34,186)
Foreign currency risk (546,705) 102,294
  $4,143,096 $(1,827,045)
7. BANK BORROWINGS
The Trust (excluding the money market funds), Wells Fargo Master Trust and Wells Fargo Variable Trust are parties to a $350,000,000 revolving credit agreement whereby the Fund is permitted to use bank borrowings for temporary or emergency purposes, such as to fund shareholder redemption requests. Interest under the credit agreement is charged to the Fund based on a borrowing rate equal to the higher of the Federal Funds rate in effect on that day plus 1.25% or the overnight LIBOR rate in effect on that day plus 1.25%. In addition, an annual commitment fee equal to 0.25% of the unused balance is allocated to each participating fund.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, there were no borrowings by the Fund under the agreement.
8. DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS
The tax character of distributions paid during the years ended May 31, 2021 and May 31, 2020 were as follows:
  Year ended May 31
  2021 2020
Ordinary income $7,587,206 $2,819,244
Long-term capital gain 6,822,945 3,659,097
As of May 31, 2021, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Undistributed
ordinary
income
Undistributed
long-term
gain
Unrealized
gains
$13,023,434 $6,082,967 $48,337,794
9. INDEMNIFICATION
Under the Fund's organizational documents, the officers and Trustees have been granted certain indemnification rights against certain liabilities that may arise out of performance of their duties to the Fund. The Fund has entered into a separate agreement with each Trustee that converts indemnification rights currently existing under the Fund’s organizational documents into contractual rights that cannot be changed in the future without the consent of the Trustee. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with service providers that contain a variety of indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent on future claims that may be made against the Fund and, therefore, cannot be estimated.
10. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
In August 2018, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 updates the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Management has adopted this guidance which did not have a material impact on the financial statements.

Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund  |  27


Notes to financial statements
11. CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization announced that it had made the assessment that coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) is a pandemic. The impacts of COVID-19 are affecting the entire global economy, individual companies and investment products, the funds, and the market in general. There is significant uncertainty around the extent and duration of business disruptions related to COVID-19 and the impacts may last for an extended period of time. COVID-19 has led to significant uncertainty and volatility in the financial markets.
12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
At a meeting held July 15, 2021, the Board of Trustees of the Wells Fargo Funds approved a change in the Fund's name to remove “Wells Fargo” from the Fund's name and replace with “Allspring”. The change is expected to go into effect on October 11, 2021.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) announced that it will be changing its company name to Allspring Global Investments upon the closing of the previously announced sale transaction of WFAM by Wells Fargo & Company to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. The new corporate name is expected to go into effect on the closing date of the transaction, which is anticipated to occur in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
Following the closing of the transaction, Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the Fund's investment manager, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, each sub-advisers to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Fund's principal underwriter, will each be rebranded as Allspring.

28  |  Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund


Report of independent registered public accounting firm
To the Shareholders of the Fund and Board of Trustees
Wells Fargo Funds Trust:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund (the Fund), one of the funds constituting Wells Fargo Funds Trust, including the portfolio of investments, as of May 31, 2021, the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the financial statements) and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of May 31, 2021, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Fund in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and financial highlights, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. Such procedures also included confirmation of securities owned as of May 31, 2021, by correspondence with the custodian, transfer agent and brokers, or by other appropriate auditing procedures. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and financial highlights. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have not been able to determine the specific year that we began serving as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies; however, we are aware that we have served as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies since at least 1955.
Boston, Massachusetts
July 28, 2021

Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund  |  29


Other information (unaudited)
TAX INFORMATION
For corporate shareholders, pursuant to Section 854 of the Internal Revenue Code, 5% of ordinary income dividends qualify for the corporate dividends-received deduction for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 852 of the Internal Revenue Code, $6,822,945 was designated as a 20% rate gain distribution for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 854 of the Internal Revenue Code, $792,361 of income dividends paid during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 has been designated as qualified dividend income (QDI).
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, $1,443,761 has been designated as interest-related dividends for nonresident alien shareholders pursuant to Section 871 of the Internal Revenue Code.
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, $5,066,569 has been designated as short-term capital gain dividends for nonresident alien shareholders pursuant to Section 871 of the Internal Revenue Code.
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, 1% of the ordinary income distributed was derived from interest on U.S. government securities.
For corporate shareholders, pursuant to Section 163(j) of the Internal Revenue Code, 16% of ordinary income dividends qualify as interest dividends for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021.
PROXY VOTING INFORMATION
A description of the policies and procedures used to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-222-8222, visiting our website at wfam.com, or visiting the SEC website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the proxies related to portfolio securities were voted during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the website at wfam.com or by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS INFORMATION
The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year as an exhibit to its reports on Form N-PORT. Shareholders may view the filed Form N-PORT by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov.

30  |  Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund


Other information (unaudited)
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS
Each of the Trustees and Officers listed in the table below acts in identical capacities for each fund in the Wells Fargo family of funds, which consists of 139 mutual funds comprising the Wells Fargo Funds Trust, Wells Fargo Variable Trust, Wells Fargo Master Trust and four closed-end funds (collectively the “Fund Complex”). This table should be read in conjunction with the Prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information1. The mailing address of each Trustee and Officer is 525 Market Street, 12th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105. Each Trustee and Officer serves an indefinite term, however, each Trustee serves such term until reaching the mandatory retirement age established by the Trustees.
Independent Trustees
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service*
Principal occupations during past five years or longer Current other
public company or
investment
company
directorships
William R. Ebsworth
(Born 1957)
Trustee,
since 2015
Retired. From 1984 to 2013, equities analyst, portfolio manager, research director and chief investment officer at Fidelity Management and Research Company in Boston, Tokyo, and Hong Kong, and retired in 2013 as Chief Investment Officer of Fidelity Strategic Advisers, Inc. where he led a team of investment professionals managing client assets. Prior thereto, Board member of Hong Kong Securities Clearing Co., Hong Kong Options Clearing Corp., the Thailand International Fund, Ltd., Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company, and Empire Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company. Audit Committee Chair and Investment Committee Chair of the Vincent Memorial Hospital Endowment (non-profit organization). Mr. Ebsworth is a CFA® charterholder. N/A
Jane A. Freeman
(Born 1953)
Trustee,
since 2015;
Chair Liaison,
since 2018
Retired. From 2012 to 2014 and 1999 to 2008, Chief Financial Officer of Scientific Learning Corporation. From 2008 to 2012, Ms. Freeman provided consulting services related to strategic business projects. Prior to 1999, Portfolio Manager at Rockefeller & Co. and Scudder, Stevens & Clark. Board member of the Harding Loevner Funds from 1996 to 2014, serving as both Lead Independent Director and chair of the Audit Committee. Board member of the Russell Exchange Traded Funds Trust from 2011 to 2012 and the chair of the Audit Committee. Ms. Freeman is also an inactive Chartered Financial Analyst. N/A
Isaiah Harris, Jr.
(Born 1952)
Trustee,
since 2009; Audit
Committee
Chair,
since 2019
Retired. Chairman of the Board of CIGNA Corporation since 2009, and Director since 2005. From 2003 to 2011, Director of Deluxe Corporation. Prior thereto, President and CEO of BellSouth Advertising and Publishing Corp. from 2005 to 2007, President and CEO of BellSouth Enterprises from 2004 to 2005 and President of BellSouth Consumer Services from 2000 to 2003. Emeritus member of the Iowa State University Foundation Board of Governors. Emeritus Member of the Advisory Board of Iowa State University School of Business. Advisory Board Member, Palm Harbor Academy (private school). Mr. Harris is a certified public accountant (inactive status). CIGNA Corporation
Judith M. Johnson
(Born 1949)
Trustee,
since 2008
Retired. Prior thereto, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund from 1996 to 2008. Ms. Johnson is an attorney, certified public accountant and a certified managerial accountant. N/A
David F. Larcker
(Born 1950)
Trustee,
since 2009
James Irvin Miller Professor of Accounting at the Graduate School of Business (Emeritus), Stanford University, Director of the Corporate Governance Research Initiative and Senior Faculty of The Rock Center for Corporate Governance since 2006. From 2005 to 2008, Professor of Accounting at the Graduate School of Business, Stanford University. Prior thereto, Ernst & Young Professor of Accounting at The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania from 1985 to 2005. N/A

Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund  |  31


Other information (unaudited)
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service*
Principal occupations during past five years or longer Current other
public company or
investment
company
directorships
Olivia S. Mitchell
(Born 1953)
Trustee,
since 2006;
Nominating and
Governance
Committee Chair,
since 2018
International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans Professor, Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania since 1993. Director of Wharton’s Pension Research Council and Boettner Center on Pensions & Retirement Research, and Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. Previously, Cornell University Professor from 1978 to 1993. N/A
Timothy J. Penny
(Born 1951)
Trustee,
since 1996;
Chair,
since 2018
President and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Minnesota Initiative Foundation, a non-profit organization, since 2007. Member of the Board of Trustees of NorthStar Education Finance, Inc., a non-profit organization, since 2007. N/A
James G. Polisson
(Born 1959)
Trustee,
since 2018
Retired. Chief Marketing Officer, Source (ETF) UK Services, Ltd, from 2015 to 2017. From 2012 to 2015, Principal of The Polisson Group, LLC, a management consulting, corporate advisory and principal investing company. Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director at Russell Investments, Global Exchange Traded Funds from 2010 to 2012. Managing Director of Barclays Global Investors from 1998 to 2010 and Global Chief Marketing Officer for iShares and Barclays Global Investors from 2000 to 2010. Trustee of the San Francisco Mechanics’ Institute, a non-profit organization, from 2013 to 2015. Board member of the Russell Exchange Traded Fund Trust from 2011 to 2012. Director of Barclays Global Investors Holdings Deutschland GmbH from 2006 to 2009. Mr. Polisson is an attorney and has a retired status with the Massachusetts and District of Columbia Bar Associations. N/A
Pamela Wheelock
(Born 1959)
Trustee,
since January
2020; previously
Trustee from
January 2018 to
July 2019
Board member of the Destination Medical Center Economic Development Agency, Rochester, Minnesota since 2019. Interim President of the McKnight Foundation from January to September 2020. Acting Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Human Services, July 2019 through September 2019. Human Services Manager (part-time), Minnesota Department of Human Services, October 2019 through December 2019. Chief Operating Officer, Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity from 2017 to 2019. Vice President of University Services, University of Minnesota from 2012 to 2016. Prior thereto, on the Board of Directors, Governance Committee and Finance Committee for the Minnesota Philanthropy Partners (Saint Paul Foundation) from 2012 to 2018, Interim Chief Executive Officer of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota from 2011 to 2012, Chairman of the Board from 2009 to 2012 and Board Director from 2003 to 2015. Vice President, Leadership and Community Engagement, Bush Foundation, Saint Paul, Minnesota (a private foundation) from 2009 to 2011. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Minnesota Sports and Entertainment from 2004 to 2009 and Senior Vice President from 2002 to 2004. Executive Vice President of the Minnesota Wild Foundation from 2004 to 2008. Commissioner of Finance, State of Minnesota, from 1999 to 2002. Currently Board Chair of the Minnesota Wild Foundation since 2010. N/A
*  Length of service dates reflect the Trustee’s commencement of service with the Trust’s predecessor entities, where applicable.

32  |  Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund


Other information (unaudited)
Officers
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service
Principal occupations during past five years or longer
Andrew Owen
(Born 1960)
President,
since 2017
Executive Vice President of Wells Fargo & Company and Head of Affiliated Managers, Wells Fargo Asset Management, since 2014. In addition, Mr. Owen is currently President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC since 2017. Prior thereto, Executive Vice President responsible for marketing, investments and product development for Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, from 2009 to 2014.
Jeremy DePalma
(Born 1974)
Treasurer,
since 2012
(for certain funds in
the Fund Complex);
since 2021 (for
the remaining funds in the
Fund Complex)
Senior Vice President of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC since 2009. Senior Vice President of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC from 2008 to 2010 and head of the Fund Reporting and Control Team within Fund Administration from 2005 to 2010.
Michelle Rhee
(Born 1966)
Chief Legal Officer,
since 2019
Secretary of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC and Chief Legal Counsel of Wells Fargo Asset Management since 2018. Deputy General Counsel of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. since 2020 and Assistant General Counsel of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. from 2018 to 2020. Associate General Counsel and Managing Director of Bank of America Corporation from 2004 to 2018.
Catherine Kennedy
(Born 1969)
Secretary,
since 2019
Vice President of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC and Senior Counsel of the Wells Fargo Legal Department since 2010. Vice President and Senior Counsel of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC from 1998 to 2010.
Michael H. Whitaker
(Born 1967)
Chief Compliance Officer,
since 2016
Chief Compliance Officer of Wells Fargo Asset Management since 2016. Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer for Fidelity Investments from 2007 to 2016.
1  The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about the Trustees and is available, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-222-8222 or by visiting the website at wfam.com.

Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund  |  33


Other information (unaudited)
LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
In accordance with Rule 22e-4 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Liquidity Rule”), Wells Fargo Funds Trust (the “Trust”) has adopted and implemented a liquidity risk management program (the “Program”) on behalf of each of its series, including the Fund, which is reasonably designed to assess and manage the Fund's liquidity risk. “Liquidity risk” is defined under the Liquidity Rule as the risk that the Fund is unable to meet redemption requests without significantly diluting remaining investors’ interests in the Fund. The Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”) previously approved the designation of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”), the Fund's investment manager, as the administrator of the Program, and Funds Management has established a Liquidity Risk Management Council (the "Council") composed of personnel from multiple departments within Funds Management and its affiliates to assist Funds Management in the implementation and on-going administration of the Program.
The Program is comprised of various components designed to support the assessment and/or management of liquidity risk, including: (1) the periodic assessment (no less frequently than annually) of certain factors that influence the Fund's liquidity risk; (2) the periodic classification (no less frequently than monthly) of the Fund's investments into one of four liquidity categories that reflect an estimate of their liquidity under current market conditions; (3) a 15% limit on the acquisition of “illiquid investments” (as defined under the Liquidity Rule); (4) to the extent the Fund does not invest primarily in “highly liquid investments” (as defined under the Liquidity Rule), the determination of a minimum percentage of the Fund's assets that generally will be invested in highly liquid investments (an “HLIM”); (5) if the Fund has established an HLIM, the periodic review (no less frequently than annually) of the HLIM and the adoption of policies and procedures for responding to a shortfall of the Fund's “highly liquid investments” below its HLIM; and (6) periodic reporting to the Board.
At a meeting of the Board held on May 17-19, 2021, the Board received and reviewed a written report (the “Report”) from Funds Management that addressed the operation of the Program and assessed its adequacy and effectiveness for the period from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 (the “Reporting Period”). Among other things, the Report discussed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on liquidity and management of liquidity risk during the Reporting Period, including during the stressed market conditions caused by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. No significant liquidity events impacting the Fund were noted in the Report. As applicable to the Fund, there were no material changes to the Program during the Reporting Period.
Funds Management concluded in the Report that the Program is operating effectively to assess and manage the Fund’s liquidity risk, and that the Program has been and continues to be adequately and effectively implemented to monitor and, as applicable, respond to the Fund’s liquidity developments.
There can be no assurance that the Program will achieve its objectives under all circumstances in the future. Please refer to the Fund’s prospectus for more information regarding the Fund’s exposure to liquidity risk and other risks to which an investment in the Fund may be subject.

34  |  Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
BOARD CONSIDERATION OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AND SUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENTS:
Board Considerations – Current Agreements
Under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Wells Fargo Funds Trust (the “Trust”) must determine annually whether to approve the continuation of the Trust’s investment management and sub-advisory agreements. In this regard, at a Board meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Meeting”), the Board, all the members of which have no direct or indirect interest in the investment management and sub-advisory agreements and are not “interested persons” of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), reviewed and approved for Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund (the “Fund”): (i) an investment management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”); and (ii) an investment sub-advisory agreement (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Wells Capital Management Incorporated (the “Sub-Adviser”), an affiliate of Funds Management. The Management Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement are collectively referred to as the “Advisory Agreements.”
The Board noted that Wells Fargo & Company recently announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”), which includes Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser, to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. and/or their affiliates (the “Transaction”). The Board further noted that the Transaction would result in a change-of-control of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser, which would be considered to be an assignment that would result in the termination of the Advisory Agreements. In light of the Transaction, the Board separately considered for approval a new investment management agreement with Funds Management and a new sub-advisory agreement with the Sub-Adviser (the “New Agreements”) that would replace the Advisory Agreements upon consummation of the Transaction, subject to approval of the New Agreements by the Fund’s shareholders. The Board also considered for approval interim agreements to go into effect in the event shareholders do not approve the New Agreements before the Transaction is completed. The interim agreements would allow the Manager and the Sub-Adviser to continue providing services to the Fund while the Fund continues to seek shareholder approval of the New Agreements. The Board noted that the terms of the interim agreements would be identical to those of the current Advisory Agreements, except for the term and certain escrow provisions.
At the Meeting, the Board considered the factors and reached the conclusions described below relating to the selection of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser and the approval of the Advisory Agreements. Prior to the Meeting, including at Board meetings held in April and May 2021, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with representatives of Funds Management about these matters. Also, the Board has adopted a team-based approach, with each team consisting of a sub-set of Trustees, to assist the full Board in the discharge of its duties in reviewing investment performance and other matters throughout the year. The Independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Advisory Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately.
In providing information to the Board, Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser were guided by a detailed set of requests for information submitted to them by independent legal counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees at the start of the Board’s annual contract renewal process earlier in 2021. In considering and approving the Advisory Agreements, the Trustees considered the information they believed relevant, including but not limited to the information discussed below. The Board considered not only the specific information presented in connection with the Meeting, but also the knowledge gained over time through interaction with Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser about various topics. In this regard, the Board reviewed reports of Funds Management at each of its quarterly meetings, which included, among other things, portfolio reviews and investment performance reports. In addition, the Board and the teams mentioned above confer with portfolio managers at various times throughout the year. The Board did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each individual Trustee may have attributed different weights to various factors.
After its deliberations, the Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser under each of the Advisory Agreements was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Advisory Agreements for a one-year term. The Board considered the approval of the Advisory Agreements for the Fund as part of its consideration of agreements for funds across the complex, but its approvals were made on a fund-by-fund basis. The following summarizes a number of important, but not necessarily all, factors considered by the Board in support of its approvals.
Nature, extent and quality of services
The Board received and considered various information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser under the Advisory Agreements. This information included a description of the investment advisory services and Fund-level administrative services covered by the Management Agreement, as well as, among other things, a summary of the background and experience of senior management of WFAM, of which Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser are a part, and a summary of investments made in the business of WFAM. The Board also received a description of

Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund  |  35


Board considerations (unaudited)
Funds Management’s and the Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans, including a summary of the performance of such plans and any changes thereto during the COVID-19 pandemic, and of their approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity. The Board also received and reviewed information about Funds Management’s role as administrator of the Fund’s liquidity risk management program, Funds Management’s approach to risk management, and Funds Management’s intermediary and vendor oversight program.
The Board also considered the qualifications, background, tenure and responsibilities of each of the portfolio managers primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the Fund. The Board evaluated the ability of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser to attract and retain qualified investment professionals, including research, advisory and supervisory personnel.
The Board further considered the compliance programs and compliance records of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser. In addition, the Board took into account the full range of services provided to the Fund by Funds Management and its affiliates. The Board also considered information about retention and back-up arrangements that have been put into place with respect to key personnel of WFAM in connection with the anticipated Transaction, noting that WFAM provided assurances that the announcement and eventual culmination of the Transaction is not expected to result in any diminution in the nature or quality of services provided to the Fund.
Fund investment performance and expenses
The Board considered the investment performance results for the Fund over various time periods ended December 31, 2020. The Board considered these results in comparison to the investment performance of funds in a universe that was determined by Broadridge Inc. (“Broadridge”) to be similar to the Fund (the “Universe”), and in comparison to the Fund’s benchmark index and to other comparative data. Broadridge is an independent provider of investment company data. The Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the performance Universe. The Board noted that the investment performance of the Fund (Administrator Class) was higher than the Universe for the one-year, three-year and ten-year periods under review, and was lower than the Universe for the five-year period. The Board also noted that the investment performance of the Fund was lower than its benchmark index, the Growth Balanced Blended Index, for all periods under review. The Board took note of the explanations for the relative underperformance during these periods, including with respect to investment decisions and market factors that affected the Fund’s investment performance. The Board noted that it will continue to monitor the Fund’s performance.
The Board also received and considered information regarding the Fund’s net operating expense ratios and their various components, including actual management fees, custodian and other non-management fees, and Rule 12b-1 and non-Rule 12b-1 shareholder service fees. The Board considered these ratios in comparison to the median ratios of funds in class-specific expense groups that were determined by Broadridge to be similar to the Fund (the “Groups”). The Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the expense Groups and an explanation of how funds comprising expense groups and their expense ratios may vary from year-to-year. Based on the Broadridge reports, the Board noted that the net operating expense ratios of the Fund were lower than the median net operating expense ratios of the expense Groups for each share class.
The Board took into account the Fund’s investment performance and expense information provided to it among the factors considered in deciding to re-approve the Advisory Agreements.
Investment management and sub-advisory fee rates
The Board reviewed and considered the contractual fee rates payable by the Fund to Funds Management under the Management Agreement, as well as the contractual fee rates payable by the Fund to Funds Management for class-level administrative services under a Class-Level Administration Agreement, which include, among other things, class-level transfer agency and sub-transfer agency costs (collectively, the “Management Rates”). The Board also reviewed and considered the contractual investment sub-advisory fee rates that are payable by Funds Management to the Sub-Adviser for investment sub-advisory services.
Among other information reviewed by the Board was a comparison of the Fund’s Management Rates with the average contractual investment management fee rates of funds in the expense Groups at a common asset level as well as transfer agency costs of the funds in the expense Groups. The Board noted that the Management Rates of the Fund were higher than the sum of these average rates for the Fund’s expense Groups for all share classes. However, the Board noted that the net operating expense ratios of the Fund were lower than the median net operating expense ratios of the expense Groups for each share class, and that the Fund was benefitting from advisory fee breakpoints through the master portfolios in which it invests.
The Board also received and considered information about the portion of the total management fee that was retained by Funds Management after payment of the fee to the Sub-Adviser for sub-advisory services. In assessing the reasonableness of this amount, the Board received and evaluated information about the nature and extent of responsibilities retained and risks assumed

36  |  Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
by Funds Management and not delegated to or assumed by the Sub-Adviser, and about Funds Management’s on-going oversight services. Given the affiliation between Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser, the Board ascribed limited relevance to the allocation of fees between them.
The Board also received and considered information about the nature and extent of services offered and fee rates charged by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser to other types of clients with investment strategies similar to those of the Fund. In this regard, the Board received information about the significantly greater scope of services, and compliance, reporting and other legal burdens and risks of managing proprietary mutual funds compared with those associated with managing assets of other types of clients, including third-party sub-advised fund clients and non-mutual fund clients such as institutional separate accounts.
Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Board determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the Management Agreement and to the Sub-Adviser under the Sub-Advisory Agreement was reasonable.
Profitability
The Board received and considered information concerning the profitability of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo & Co. (“Wells Fargo”) from providing services to the fund family as a whole. The Board noted that the Sub-Adviser’s profitability information with respect to providing services to the Fund and other funds in the family was subsumed in the WFAM and Wells Fargo profitability analysis.
Funds Management reported on the methodologies and estimates used in calculating profitability, including a description of the methodology used to allocate certain expenses. Among other things, the Board noted that the levels of profitability reported on a fund-by-fund basis varied widely, depending on factors such as the size, type and age of fund.
Based on its review, the Board did not deem the profits reported by Funds Management, WFAM or Wells Fargo from services provided to the Fund to be at a level that would prevent it from approving the continuation of the Advisory Agreements.
Economies of scale
The Board received and considered information about the potential for Funds Management to experience economies of scale in the provision of management services to the Fund, the difficulties of calculating economies of scale at an individual fund level, and the extent to which potential scale benefits are shared with Fund shareholders. The Board noted the existence of breakpoints in the Fund’s management fee structure, which operate generally to reduce the Fund’s expense ratios as the Fund grows in size, and the size of the Fund in relation to such breakpoints. The Board considered that in addition to management fee breakpoints, Funds Management shares potential economies of scale from its management business in a variety of ways, including through fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangements, competitive management fee rates set at the outset without regard to breakpoints, and investments in the business intended to enhance services available to shareholders.
The Board concluded that Funds Management’s arrangements with respect to the Fund, including contractual breakpoints, constituted a reasonable approach to sharing potential economies of scale with the Fund and its shareholders.
Other benefits to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser
The Board received and considered information regarding potential “fall-out” or ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including the Sub-Adviser, as a result of their relationships with the Fund. Ancillary benefits could include, among others, benefits directly attributable to other relationships with the Fund and benefits potentially derived from an increase in Funds Management’s and the Sub-Adviser’s business as a result of their relationships with the Fund. The Board noted that various affiliates of Funds Management may receive distribution-related fees, shareholder servicing payments and sub-transfer agency fees in respect of shares sold or held through them and services provided.
The Board also reviewed information about soft dollar credits earned and utilized by the Sub-Adviser, fees earned by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser from managing a private investment vehicle for the fund family’s securities lending collateral, and commissions earned by an affiliated broker from portfolio transactions.
Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Board did not find that any ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including the Sub-Adviser, were unreasonable.
Conclusion
At the Meeting, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser under each of the Advisory Agreements was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Advisory Agreements for a one-year term.

Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund  |  37


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board Considerations – New Agreements
Overview of the Board evaluation process
At a meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Board Meeting”), the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Wells Fargo Funds Trust (the “Trust”, and the series identified below, the “Funds”) approved the continuation of each Fund’s current Investment Management Agreement (the “Current Investment Management Agreement”) and the current Wells Cap Sub-Advisory Agreement (the “Current Wells Cap Sub-Advisory Agreement”, and collectively, the “Current Agreements”).
Wells Fargo Absolute Return Fund
Wells Fargo Core Plus Bond Fund
Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund
Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund
Wells Fargo Specialized Technology Fund
Wells Fargo Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund
Wells Fargo Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund
Wells Fargo Spectrum Growth Fund
Wells Fargo Spectrum Income Allocation Fund
Wells Fargo Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund
Each Trustee on the Board is not an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”)) of the Funds (collectively, the “Independent Trustees”). The process followed by the Board in considering and approving the continuation of the Current Agreements is referred to herein as the “2021 Annual Approval Process.”
As noted above, the closing of the sale of Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”) to a holding company (“NewCo”) affiliated with private funds of GTCR LLC (“GTCR”) and of Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. (“Reverence Capital”, and such transaction, the “Transaction”) will result in a change of control of Wells Fargo Funds Management LLC (“Funds Management”) and Wells Capital Management Incorporated (“Wells Capital”, and together with Funds Management, the “Advisers”), which will be considered to be an “assignment” of each Fund’s Current Agreements under the 1940 Act that will result in the automatic termination of each Fund’s Current Agreements. In light of the expected termination of each Fund’s Current Agreements upon the closing, at the Board Meeting the Board also considered and approved: (i) (i) a new Investment Management Agreement (the “New Investment Management Agreement”) between the Trust, on behalf of each Fund, and Funds Management; (ii) a new Sub-Advisory Agreement (the “New Wells Capital Sub-Advisory Agreement”) among the Trust, Funds Management and Wells Capital with respect to Core Plus Bond Fund, Growth Balanced Fund, Moderate Balanced Fund, Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund, Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund, Spectrum Growth Fund, Spectrum Income Allocation Fund, and Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund; and (iii) a new Sub-Advisory Agreement (the “New AllianzGI U.S. Sub-Advisory Agreement”, and collectively, the “New Agreements”) among the Trust, Funds Management and Allianz Global Investors U.S., LLC (“AllianzGI U.S.”, and together with Wells Capital, the “Sub-Advisers”) with respect to the Specialized Technology Fund, each of which is intended to go into effect upon the closing. The process followed by the Board in reviewing and approving the New Agreements is referred to herein as the “New Agreement Approval Process.”
At a series of meetings held in April and May 2021 (collectively, “April and May 2021 Meetings”) and at the Board Meeting, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital about the New Agreements and related matters. The Board reviewed and discussed information furnished by Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital that the Board considered reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the New Agreements and the services to be provided. At these meetings, senior representatives from Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital made presentations to, and responded to questions from, the Board.
In providing information to the Board in connection with the 2021 annual approval process for the Current Agreements (the “2021 Annual Approval Process”) and the New Agreement Approval Process, Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital (as applicable) were guided by requests for information submitted by independent legal counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. In considering and approving the New Agreements, the Trustees considered the information they believed relevant, including but not limited to the information discussed herein. The Board considered not only the specific information presented in connection with the April and May 2021 Meetings as well as the Board Meeting, but also the knowledge gained over time through interaction with Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers about various topics. In this regard, the Board reviews reports of Funds Management at each of its regular Board meetings, which includes, among other things, portfolio reviews and investment

38  |  Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
performance reports. In addition, the Board confers with portfolio managers at various times throughout the year. The Board was assisted in its evaluation of the New Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom the Independent Trustees received separate legal advice and with whom the Independent Trustees met separately. The Board did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each individual Trustee may have attributed different weights to various factors.
Among other information considered by the Board in connection with the Transaction was:
■  Information regarding the Transaction: information about the structure, financing sources and material terms and conditions of the Transaction, including the expected impact on the businesses conducted by the Advisers and by Wells Fargo Funds Distributor LLC, as the distributor of Fund shares.
■  Information regarding NewCo, GTCR and Reverence Capital: (i) information about NewCo, including information about its expected financial condition and access to capital, and senior leadership team; (ii) the experience of senior management at GTCR and Reverence Capital in acquiring portfolio companies; (iii) the plan to operationalize NewCo, including the transition of necessary infrastructure services through a transition services agreement with Wells Fargo under which Wells Fargo will continue to provide NewCo with certain services for a specified period of time after the closing; and (iv) information regarding regulatory matters, compliance, and risk management functions at NewCo, including resources to be dedicated thereto.
■  Impact of the Transaction on WFAM and Service Providers: (i) information regarding any changes to personnel and/or other resources of the Advisers as a result of the Transaction, including assurances regarding comparable and competitive compensation arrangements to attract and retain highly qualified personnel; and (ii) information about the organizational and operating structure with respect to NewCo, the Advisers and the Funds.
■  Impact of the Transaction on the Funds and their Shareholders: (i) information regarding anticipated benefits to the Funds as a result of the Transaction; (ii) a commitment that the Funds would not bear any expenses, directly or indirectly, in connection with the Transaction; (iii) confirmation that the Advisers intend to continue to manage the Funds in a manner consistent with each Fund’s current investment objectives and principal investments strategies; and (iv) a commitment that neither NewCo nor WFAM will take any steps that would impose any “unfair burden” (as that term is used in section 15(f)(1)(B) of the 1940 Act) on the Funds as a result of the Transaction.
With respect to the New Agreements, the Board considered: (i) a representation that, after the closing, all of the Funds will continue to be managed and advised by their current Advisers, and, for Specialized Technology Fund only, AllianzGI U.S., and that the same portfolio managers of the Sub-Advisers are expected to continue to manage the Funds after the Transaction; (ii) information regarding the terms of the New Agreements, including changes as compared to the Current Agreements; (iii) information confirming that the fee rates payable under the New Agreements will not increase as a result of the Transaction as compared to the rates under the Current Agreements; and (iv) assurances that the Transaction is not expected to cause any diminution with respect to the nature, extent and quality of any of the services currently provided to the Funds by the Advisers and, for Specialized Technology Fund only, AllianzGI U.S., as a result of the Transaction.
In addition to considering information furnished specifically to evaluate the impact of the Transaction on the Funds and their respective shareholders in connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board considered information furnished at prior meetings of the Board and its committees, including detailed information provided in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process. In this regard, in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board received information about complex-wide and individual Fund performance, fees and expenses, including: (i) a report from an independent data provider comparing the investment performance of each Fund to the investment performance of comparable funds and benchmark indices, over various time periods; (ii) a report from an independent data provider comparing each Fund’s total expense ratio (and its components) to those of comparable funds; (iii) comparative information concerning the fees charged and services provided by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to each Fund in managing other accounts (which may include other mutual funds, collective investment funds and institutional accounts), if any, that employ investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing such Fund(s); and (iv) profitability analyses of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo from providing services to the fund family as a whole.
After its deliberations, the Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the New Agreements is reasonable, approved the New Agreements for a two-year term, and voted to recommend that Fund shareholders approve the New Agreements. The Board considered the approval of the New Agreements as part of its consideration of agreements for funds across the complex, but its approvals were made on a fund-by-fund basis. The following summarizes a number of important, but not necessarily all, factors considered by the Board in support of its approvals.

Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund  |  39


Board considerations (unaudited)
Nature, extent and quality of services
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board received and considered various information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the Advisory Agreements. This information included a description of the investment advisory services and Fund-level administrative services covered by the Current Management Agreement, as well as, among other things, a summary of the background and experience of senior management of WFAM, of which Funds Management and Wells Capital are a part, and a summary of investments made in the business of WFAM. The Board also received a description of Funds Management’s and the Sub-Advisers’ business continuity plans, including a summary of the performance of such plans and any changes thereto during the COVID-19 pandemic, and of their approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity. The Board also received and reviewed information about Funds Management’s role as administrator of the Funds’ liquidity risk management program, Funds Management’s approach to risk management, and Funds Management’s intermediary and vendor oversight program.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board also considered the qualifications, background, tenure and responsibilities of each of the portfolio managers primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the Funds. The Board evaluated the ability of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to attract and retain qualified investment professionals, including research, advisory and supervisory personnel.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board further considered the compliance programs and compliance records of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers. In addition, the Board took into account the full range of services provided to the Fund by Funds Management and its affiliates.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board considered, among other information, the structure of the Transaction and expected impact, if any, of the Transaction on the operations, facilities, organization and personnel of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers. The Board received assurances from Funds Management that each Fund will continue to be advised by its current Sub-Adviser after the closing, and that the same individual portfolio managers are expected to continue to manage the Funds after the closing. With respect to the recruitment and retention of key personnel, the Board noted information from GTCR, Reverence Capital and the Advisers regarding the potential benefits for employees of joining NewCo. The Board recognized that the personnel who had been extended offers may not accept such offers and personnel changes may occur in the future in the ordinary course.
In addition, the Board considered information regarding the infrastructure, operational capabilities and support staff in place to assist in the portfolio management and operations of the Funds, including the provision of administrative services, and the anticipated impact of the Transaction on such matters. The Board also considered the business-related and other risks to which the Advisers may be subject in managing the Funds and in connection with the Transaction. The Board also considered the transition and integration plans as a result of the change in ownership of the Advisers from Wells Fargo to NewCo. The Board considered the resources and infrastructure that NewCo intends to devote to its compliance program to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations, as well as its risk management program and cybersecurity program. The Board also took into account assurances received from the Advisers, GTCR and Reverence Capital that the Transaction is not expected to cause any diminution in the nature, extent and quality of services provided by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to the Funds and their shareholders.
Fund investment performance and expenses
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board considered the investment performance results for each Fund over various time periods ended December 31, 2020. The Board considered these results in comparison to the investment performance of funds in a universe that was determined by Broadridge Inc. (“Broadridge”) to be similar to each Fund (the “Universe”), and in comparison to each Fund’s benchmark index and to other comparative data. Broadridge is an independent provider of investment company data. The Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the performance Universe. Where applicable, the Board received information concerning, and discussed factors contributing to, underperformance of Funds relative to the Universe and benchmark for any underperformance periods.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board also received and considered information regarding each Fund’s net operating expense ratios and their various components, including actual management fees, custodian and other non-management fees, and Rule 12b-1 and non-Rule 12b-1 shareholder service fees. The Board considered these ratios in comparison to the median ratios of funds in class-specific expense groups that were determined by Broadridge to be similar to the Fund (the “Groups”). The Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the expense Groups and an explanation of how funds comprising expense groups and their expense ratios may vary from year-to-year.

40  |  Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board received a commitment that WFAM will maintain fee and expense commitments for at least two years after the closing. The Board took into account each Fund’s investment performance and expense information among the factors considered in deciding to approve the New Agreements.
Investment management and sub-advisory fee rates
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board reviewed and considered the contractual fee rates payable by each Fund to Funds Management under the Current Management Agreement, as well as the contractual fee rates payable by each Fund to Funds Management for class-level administrative services under a Class-Level Administration Agreement, which include, among other things, class-level transfer agency and sub-transfer agency costs (collectively, the “Management Rates”). The Board also reviewed and considered the contractual investment sub-advisory fee rates that are payable by Funds Management to each of the Sub-Advisers under the Current Sub-Advisory Agreements for investment sub-advisory services (the “Sub-Advisory Fee Rates”).
Among other information reviewed by the Board in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, was a comparison of each Fund’s Management Rates with the average contractual investment management fee rates of funds in the expense Groups at a common asset level as well as transfer agency costs of the funds in the expense Groups.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board also received and considered information about the portion of the total management fee that was retained by Funds Management after payment of the Sub-Advisory Fee Rates. In assessing the reasonableness of this amount, the Board received and evaluated information about the nature and extent of responsibilities retained and risks assumed by Funds Management and not delegated to or assumed by the Sub-Advisers, and about Funds Management’s on-going oversight services. With respect to AllianzGI U.S., the Board also considered this amount in comparison to the median amount retained by advisers to funds in a sub-advised expense universe that was determined by Broadridge to be similar to the Specialized Technology Fund. In this regard, the Board noted the small size of the sub-advised expense universe. The Board also considered that the sub-advisory fees paid to AllianzGI U.S. had been negotiated by Funds Management on an arm’s length basis. Given the affiliation between Funds Management and Wells Capital, the Board ascribed limited relevance to the allocation of fees between them.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board also received and considered information about the nature and extent of services offered and fee rates charged by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to other types of clients, if any, with investment strategies similar to those of each Fund. In this regard, the Board received information about the significantly greater scope of services, and compliance, reporting and other legal burdens and risks of managing proprietary mutual funds compared with those associated with managing assets of other types of clients, including third-party sub-advised fund clients and non-mutual fund clients such as institutional separate accounts.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board noted the assurances received by it that there would be no increases to any of the Management Rates or the Sub-Advisory Fee Rates as a result of the Transaction. The Board also considered that the New Agreements do not change the computation method for calculating such fees, and there is no present intention to reduce expense waiver and reimbursement arrangements that are currently in effect. Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Board determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the New Management Agreement and to each of the Sub-Advisers under the New Sub-Advisory Agreements was reasonable.
Profitability
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board received and considered information concerning the profitability of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo from providing services to the fund family as a whole. The Board noted that Wells Capital’s profitability information with respect to providing services to each Fund Wells Capital sub-advises and other funds in the family was subsumed in the WFAM and Wells Fargo profitability analysis. The Board did not consider profitability with respect to AllianzGI U.S., as the sub-advisory fees paid to AllianzGI U.S. had been negotiated by Funds Management on an arm’s-length basis.
Funds Management reported on the methodologies and estimates used in calculating profitability in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, including a description of the methodology used to allocate certain expenses. Among other things, the Board noted that the levels of profitability reported on a fund-by-fund basis varied widely, depending on factors such as the size, type and age of fund.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board received certain information about NewCo’s projected financial condition, and reviewed with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital the underlying assumptions on which such information was based. The Board considered that NewCo is a newly formed entity, with no historical

Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund  |  41


Board considerations (unaudited)
operations, revenues or expenses, and that it is difficult to predict with any degree of certainty the future profitability of NewCo and the Advisers from advisory activities under the New Agreements. The Board considered that the fee rates payable under the New Agreements will not increase as a result of the Transaction as compared to the rates under the Current Agreements, and that the current contractual expense limitations applicable to each Fund will not increase. The Board noted that if the New Agreements are approved by shareholders and the Transaction closes, the Board will have the opportunity in the future to review the profitability of NewCo and the Advisers from advisory activities under the New Agreements.
Economies of scale
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board received and considered information about the potential for Funds Management to experience economies of scale in the provision of management services to the Funds, the difficulties of calculating economies of scale at an individual fund level, and the extent to which potential scale benefits are shared with Fund shareholders. The Board noted the existence of breakpoints in each Fund’s management fee structure, which operate generally to reduce the Fund’s expense ratios as the Fund grows in size, and the size of the Fund in relation to such breakpoints. The Board considered that, in addition to management fee breakpoints, Funds Management shares potential economies of scale from its management business in a variety of ways, including through fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangements, competitive management fee rates set at the outset without regard to breakpoints, and investments in the business intended to enhance services available to shareholders.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board noted that NewCo and the Advisers may benefit from possible growth of the Funds resulting from enhanced distribution capabilities. However, the Board noted that other factors could also affect the potential for economies of scale, and that it was not possible to quantify any potential future economies of scale. Based upon the information furnished to the Board in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process and the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board concluded that Funds Management’s arrangements with respect to each Fund, including contractual breakpoints and expense limitation arrangements, constituted a reasonable approach to sharing potential economies of scale with the Fund and its shareholders.
“Fall-out” benefits to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board received and considered information regarding potential “fall-out” or ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including Wells Capital, and AllianzGI U.S. as a result of their relationships with the Funds. Ancillary benefits could include, among others, benefits directly attributable to other relationships with the Funds and benefits potentially derived from an increase in Funds Management’s and the Sub-Advisers’ business as a result of their relationships with the Funds. The Board noted that various current affiliates of Funds Management may receive distribution-related fees, shareholder servicing payments and sub-transfer agency fees in respect of shares sold or held through them and services provided.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board also reviewed information about soft dollar credits earned and utilized by the Sub-Advisers, fees earned by Funds Management and Wells Capital from managing a private investment vehicle for the fund family’s securities lending collateral, and commissions earned by an affiliated broker of Wells Fargo from portfolio transactions.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board received information to the effect that the Transaction is not expected to have a material impact on the fall-out benefits currently realized by Funds Management and its affiliates, including Wells Capital, and AllianzGI U.S. The information reviewed by the Board also noted that several of the ancillary benefits identified for WFAM would be potential ancillary benefits for NewCo, including that the scale and reputation of the Funds might benefit NewCo’s broader reputation, product initiatives, technology investment and talent acquisition. Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Board did not find that any ancillary benefits expected to be received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including NewCo and Wells Capital, and AllianzGI U.S. under the New Agreements were unreasonable.
Conclusion
At the Board Meeting, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and to each of the Sub-Advisers under the New Agreements is reasonable, approved the New Agreements for a two-year term, and voted to recommend that Fund shareholders approve the New Agreements.

42  |  Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board Considerations - Interim Agreements
At a meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Board Meeting”), the Boards of Trustees (each, a “Board”, and collectively, the “Boards”) of Wells Fargo Funds Trust, Wells Fargo Master Trust, Wells Fargo Variable Trust, Wells Fargo Global Dividend Opportunity Fund, Wells Fargo Income Opportunities Fund, Wells Fargo Multi-Sector Income Fund and Wells Fargo Utilities and High Income Fund (each a “Trust”, and the series thereof, a “Fund”) reviewed and approved for the Trusts and Funds, as applicable: (i) interim investment management agreements (the “Interim Management Agreements”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”); (ii) interim investment advisory agreements (the “Interim Advisory Agreements”) with Funds Management; and (iii) interim sub-advisory agreements (the “Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements”) with each of Cooke & Bieler, L.P., Galliard Capital Management LLC (“Galliard”), Peregrine Capital Management Inc., Wells Capital Management LLC (“WellsCap”), and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited (“WFAMI”, and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”). Each Trustee on the Board is not an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) of the Funds (collectively, the “Independent Trustees”). The Interim Management Agreements, Interim Advisory Agreements, and Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements are collectively referred to as the “Interim Advisory Agreements.”
At the Board Meeting, the Boards reviewed and approved the continuation of existing investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements (the “Current Advisory Agreements”) for each Trust and Fund, as applicable. The factors considered and conclusions reached by the Boards in approving the Current Advisory Agreements are summarized in the section entitled “Board Considerations – Current Agreements” of this shareholder report. The Boards noted that Wells Fargo & Company has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”), which includes Funds Management, Galliard, WellsCap and WFAMI (the “Affiliated Sub-Advisers”), to a holding company affiliated with private funds of GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. (the “Transaction”). The Boards further noted that the Transaction would result in a change-of-control of Funds Management and the Affiliated Sub-Advisers, which would be considered to be an “assignment” under the 1940 Act that would terminate the Current Advisory Agreements. At the Board Meeting, the Boards also reviewed and approved new investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements (the “New Advisory Agreements”) for each Trust and Fund, as applicable, that would replace the Current Advisory Agreements upon consummation of the Transaction, subject to approval of the New Advisory Agreements by the applicable Trust’s or Fund’s shareholders. The factors considered and conclusions reached by the Boards in approving the New Advisory Agreements are summarized in the section entitled “Board Considerations – New Agreements” of this shareholder report.
At the Board Meeting, the Boards also approved the Interim Advisory Agreements, which will go into effect for a Trust or Fund only in the event that shareholders of such Trust or Fund do not approve the New Advisory Agreement(s) for the Trust or Fund by the closing date of the Transaction, when the Current Advisory Agreements will terminate. The Board noted that, in such a circumstance, the Interim Advisory Agreements will permit continuity of management by allowing Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to continue providing services to the Trust or Fund pursuant to the Interim Advisory Agreements while the Trust or Fund continues to solicit shareholder approval of such New Advisory Agreement(s). The Boards noted that the terms of the Interim Advisory Agreements are identical to those of the Current Advisory Agreements, except for the term and the addition of escrow provisions with respect to the advisory fees. The Boards also noted that the entities that would service the Funds and Trusts under the Interim Advisory Agreements are identical to those that provide services under the Current Advisory Agreements and those that will provide services under the New Advisory Agreements.
In approving the Interim Advisory Agreements, the Boards considered the same factors and reached the same conclusions as they considered and reached with respect to the Boards’ approvals of the Current Advisory Agreements and New Advisory Agreements, as applicable, which are described in separate Board Consideration sections within this shareholder report. Prior to the Board Meeting, including at a series of meetings held in April and May 2021, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. about the Interim Advisory Agreements and related matters. The Independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Interim Advisory Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately.
At the Board Meeting, after considering the factors and reaching the conclusions described in the separate Board Consideration sections within this shareholder report, the Boards unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and to each Sub-Adviser under each of the Interim Advisory Agreements was reasonable, and approved the Interim Advisory Agreements.

Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund  |  43


For more information
More information about Wells Fargo Funds is available free upon request. To obtain literature, please write, visit the Fund's website, or call:
Wells Fargo Funds
P.O. Box 219967
Kansas City, MO 64121-9967
Website: wfam.com
Individual investors: 1-800-222-8222
Retail investment professionals: 1-888-877-9275
Institutional investment professionals: 1-866-765-0778
This report and the financial statements contained herein are submitted for the general information of the shareholders of the Fund. If this report is used for promotional purposes, distribution of the report must be accompanied or preceded by a current prospectus. Before investing, please consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of the investment. For a current prospectus and, if available, a summary prospectus, containing this information, call 1-800-222-8222 or visit the Fund's website at wfam.com. Read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) is the trade name for certain investment advisory/management firms owned by Wells Fargo & Company. These firms include but are not limited to Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC. Certain products managed by WFAM entities are distributed by Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC (a broker-dealer and Member FINRA).
This material is for general informational and educational purposes only and is NOT intended to provide investment advice or a recommendation of any kind - including a recommendation for any specific investment, strategy, or plan.
 INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED  ■  NO BANK GUARANTEE  ■  MAY LOSE VALUE 
© 2021 Wells Fargo & Company. All rights reserved.
PAR-0621-00527 07-21
A278/AR278 05-21


Annual Report
May 31, 2021
Wells Fargo
Moderate Balanced Fund




Contents
 
Reduce clutter.
Save trees.
Sign up for electronic delivery of prospectuses and shareholder reports at wellsfargo.com/ advantagedelivery
The views expressed and any forward-looking statements are as of May 31, 2021, unless otherwise noted, and are those of the Fund's portfolio managers and/or Wells Fargo Asset Management. Discussions of individual securities or the markets generally are not intended as individual recommendations. Future events or results may vary significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. The views expressed are subject to change at any time in response to changing circumstances in the market. Wells Fargo Asset Management and the Fund disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any views expressed or forward-looking statements.
 INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED  ■  NO BANK GUARANTEE  ■  MAY LOSE VALUE 

Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund  |  1


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
Andrew Owen
President
Wells Fargo Funds
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to offer you this annual report for the Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021. Despite the initial challenges presented by the spread of COVID-19 cases and the business restrictions implemented throughout much of the world, global stocks showed robust returns, supported by global stimulus programs, a rapid vaccination rollout, and recovering consumer and corporate sentiment. Bond markets mostly produced positive returns, as investors searched for yield and diversification during difficult market stretches.
For the 12-month period, equities had robust returns, as policymakers continued to fight the effects of COVID-19. Emerging market stocks led both non-U.S. developed market equities and U.S. stocks. Gains by fixed-income securities were varied, though mostly positive. For the period, U.S. stocks, based on the S&P 500 Index,1 gained 40.32%. International stocks, as measured by the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net),2 returned 42.78%, while the MSCI EM Index (Net),3 had stronger performance, with a 51.00% gain. Among bond indexes, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index,4 returned -0.40%, the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (unhedged),5 gained 7.84%, the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index,6 returned 4.74%, and the ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index,7 returned 15.18%.
The COVID-19 lockdown began over a year ago.
By June, economies started to reopen and global central banks committed to do all they could to provide economic support through liquidity and low borrowing costs. U.S. economic activity was aided by one-time $1,200 stimulus checks and $600 weekly bonus unemployment benefits that lasted through July. However, unemployment remained historically high and COVID-19 cases began to increase by late June. China’s economic recovery began to pick up momentum.
July was broadly positive for equities and fixed income. However, economic data and a resurgence of COVID-19 cases underscored the urgent need to regain control of the pandemic. Second-quarter gross domestic product (GDP) shrank from the previous quarter by 9.5% and 12.1% in the U.S. and the eurozone, respectively. In contrast, China’s second-quarter GDP grew 3.2% year over year. The U.S. economy added 1.8 million jobs in July, but a double-digit jobless rate persisted.

1 The S&P 500 Index consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. It is a market-value-weighted index with each stock's weight in the index proportionate to its market value. You cannot invest directly in an index.
2 The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) All Country World Index (ACWI) ex USA Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed and emerging markets, excluding the United States. Source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI. You cannot invest directly in an index.

1 The S&P 500 Index consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. It is a market-value-weighted index with each stock's weight in the index proportionate to its market value. You cannot invest directly in an index.
3 The MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure equity market performance of emerging markets. You cannot invest directly in an index.

1 The S&P 500 Index consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. It is a market-value-weighted index with each stock's weight in the index proportionate to its market value. You cannot invest directly in an index.
4 The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based benchmark that measures the investment-grade, U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage pass-throughs), asset-backed securities, and commercial mortgage-backed securities. You cannot invest directly in an index.

1 The S&P 500 Index consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. It is a market-value-weighted index with each stock's weight in the index proportionate to its market value. You cannot invest directly in an index.
5 The Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (unhedged) is an unmanaged index that provides a broad-based measure of the global investment-grade fixed-income markets excluding the U.S. dollar-denominated debt market. You cannot invest directly in an index.

1 The S&P 500 Index consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. It is a market-value-weighted index with each stock's weight in the index proportionate to its market value. You cannot invest directly in an index.
6 The Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index composed of long-term tax-exempt bonds with a minimum credit rating of Baa. You cannot invest directly in an index.

1 The S&P 500 Index consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. It is a market-value-weighted index with each stock's weight in the index proportionate to its market value. You cannot invest directly in an index.
7 The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index of domestic and Yankee high-yield bonds. The index tracks the performance of high-yield securities traded in the U.S. bond market. You cannot invest directly in an index. Copyright 2021. ICE Data Indices, LLC. All rights reserved.

2  |  Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
The stock market continued to rally in August despite concerns over rising numbers of U.S. and European COVID-19 cases as well as the July expiration of the $600 weekly bonus unemployment benefit. Relatively strong second-quarter earnings boosted investor sentiment along with the U.S. Federal Reserve Board’s (Fed’s) announcement of a monetary policy shift expected to support longer-term low interest rates. U.S. manufacturing and services activity indexes beat expectations while the U.S. housing market maintained strength. In Europe, retail sales expanded and consumer confidence was steady. China’s economy continued to expand.
Stocks grew more volatile in September on mixed economic data. U.S. economic activity continued to grow. However, U.S. unemployment remained elevated at 7.9% in September. With the U.S. Congress delaying further fiscal relief and uncertainties surrounding a possible vaccine, doubts crept back into the financial markets. In the U.K., a lack of progress in Brexit talks weighed on markets. China’s economy picked up steam, fueled by increased global demand.
In October, capital markets stepped back from their six-month rally. Market volatility rose in advance of the U.S. election and amid a global increase in COVID-19 infections. Europe introduced tighter restrictions affecting economic activity. U.S. markets looked favorably at the prospect of Democratic control of the federal purse strings, which could lead to additional fiscal stimulus and a boost to economic activity. Meanwhile, China reported 4.9% third-quarter GDP growth.
Global stocks rallied in November, propelled by optimism over three promising COVID-19 vaccines. Reversing recent trends, value stocks outperformed growth stocks and cyclical stocks outpaced information technology (IT) stocks. However, U.S. unemployment remained elevated, with a net job loss of 10 million since February. The eurozone services Purchasing Managers' Index, a monthly survey of purchasing managers, contracted sharply while the region’s manufacturing activity grew. The U.S. election results added to the upbeat mood as investors anticipated more consistent policies in the new administration.
Financial markets ended the year with strength on high expectations for a rapid rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines, the successful passage of a $900 billion stimulus package, and rising expectations of additional economic support from a Democratic-led Congress. U.S. economic data were mixed with still-elevated unemployment and weak retail sales but growth in manufacturing output. In contrast, China’s economic expansion continued in both manufacturing and nonmanufacturing. U.S. COVID-19 infection rates continued to rise even as new state and local lockdown measures were implemented.
The calendar year 2021 began with emerging market stocks leading all major asset classes in January, driven by China’s strong economic growth and a broad recovery in corporate earnings, which propelled China’s stock market higher. In the U.S., positive news on vaccine trials and January expansion in both the manufacturing and services sectors was offset by a weak December monthly jobs report. This was compounded by technical factors as some hedge funds were forced to sell stocks to protect themselves against a well-publicized short squeeze coordinated by a group of retail investors. Eurozone sentiment and economic growth were particularly weak, reflecting the impact of a new lockdown with stricter social distancing along with a slow vaccine rollout.
February saw major domestic equity indexes driven higher on the hope of a new stimulus bill, improving COVID-19 vaccination numbers, and the gradual reopening of the economy. Most S&P 500 companies reported better-than-expected earnings, with positive surprises coming from the financials, IT, health care, and materials sectors. Japan saw its economy strengthen as a result of strong export numbers. Meanwhile, crude oil prices continued their climb, rising more than 25% for the year. Domestic government bonds experienced a sharp sell-off in late February as markets priced in a more robust economic recovery and higher future growth and inflation expectations.
Global stocks rallied in November, propelled by optimism over three promising COVID-19 vaccines.

Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund  |  3


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
The passage of the massive domestic stimulus bill highlighted March activity, leading to increased forecasts for U.S. growth in 2021.
The passage of the massive domestic stimulus bill highlighted March activity, leading to increased forecasts for U.S. growth in 2021. Domestic employment surged as COVID-19 vaccinations and an increasingly open economy spurred hiring. A majority of U.S. small companies reported they were operating at pre-pandemic capacity or higher. Value stocks continued its outperformance of growth stocks in the month, continuing the trend that started in late 2020. Meanwhile, most major developed global equity indexes were up month to date on the back of rising optimism regarding the outlook for global growth. While the U.S. and U.K. have been the most successful in terms of the vaccine rollout, even in markets where the vaccine has lagged, such as in the eurozone and Japan, equity indexes in many of those countries have also been in positive territory this year.
Equity markets produced another strong showing in April. Domestically, the continued reopening of the economy had a strong impact on positive equity performance, as people started leaving their households and jobless claims continued to fall. Domestic corporate bonds performed well and the U.S. dollar weakened. Meanwhile, the U.S. government continued to seek to invest in the recovery, this time by outlining a package of over $2 billion to improve infrastructure. The primary headwind in April was inflation, as investors tried to determine the breadth and longevity of recent price increases. Developed Europe has been supported by a meaningful increase in the pace of vaccinations. Unfortunately many emerging market countries have not been as successful. India in particular has seen COVID-19 cases surge, serving as an example of the need to get vaccinations rolled out to less developed nations.
Vaccine rollouts continued in May, leading to loosened restrictions globally. As a result, equity markets in general saw a minor increase in returns. Concerns that the continued economic rebound could result in inflation increases becoming more than transitory were supported by the higher input costs businesses are experiencing. Meanwhile, those inflation concerns were tempered by the Fed, which stayed steady on its view of the economy and eased fears of a sudden and substantial policy change. Positive performance in the emerging market equity space was supported this month by steady consumer demand and strong commodity prices. Fixed-income markets were also slightly positive for the month, driven by inflation uncertainty and a softer U.S. dollar.
Don’t let short-term uncertainty derail long-term investment goals.
Periods of investment uncertainty can present challenges, but experience has taught us that maintaining long-term investment goals can be an effective way to plan for the future. Although diversification cannot guarantee an investment profit or prevent losses, we believe it can be an effective way to manage investment risk and potentially smooth out overall portfolio performance. We encourage investors to know their investments and to understand that appropriate levels of risk-taking may unlock opportunities.
Thank you for choosing to invest with Wells Fargo Funds. We appreciate your confidence in us and remain committed to helping you meet your financial needs.
Sincerely,
Andrew Owen
President
Wells Fargo Funds

For further information about your Fund, contact your investment professional, visit our website at wfam.com, or call us directly at 1-800-222-8222.

4  |  Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
Preparing for LIBOR Transition
The global financial industry is preparing to transition away from the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), a key benchmark interest rate, to new alternative rates. LIBOR underpins more than $350 trillion of financial contracts. It is the benchmark rate for a wide spectrum of products ranging from residential mortgages to corporate bonds to derivatives. Regulators have called for a market-wide transition away from LIBOR to successor reference rates by the end of 2021 (expected to be extended through June 30, 2023 for most tenors of the U.S. dollar LIBOR), which requires proactive steps be taken by issuers, counterparties, and asset managers to identify impacted products and adopt new reference rates.
The Fund invests in at least one underlying fund that holds one or more securities that use LIBOR as a floating reference rate and has a maturity date after December 31, 2021.
Although the transition process away from LIBOR has become increasingly well-defined in advance of the anticipated discontinuation date, there remains uncertainty regarding the nature of successor reference rates, and any potential effects of the transition away from LIBOR on investment instruments that use it as a benchmark rate. The transition process may result in, among other things, increased volatility or illiquidity in markets for instruments that currently rely on LIBOR and could negatively impact the value of certain instruments held by the Fund.
Wells Fargo Asset Management is monitoring LIBOR exposure closely and has put resources and controls in place to manage this transition effectively. The Fund’s portfolio management team is evaluating LIBOR holdings to understand what happens to those securities when LIBOR ceases to exist, including examining security documentation to identify the presence or absence of fallback language identifying a replacement rate to LIBOR.
While the pace of transition away from LIBOR will differ by asset class and investment strategy, the portfolio management team will monitor market conditions for those holdings to identify and mitigate deterioration or volatility in pricing and liquidity and ensure appropriate actions are taken in a timely manner.
Further information regarding the potential risks associated with the discontinuation of LIBOR can be found in the Fund’s Statement of Additional Information.

Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund  |  5


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Investment objective The Fund seeks total return, consisting of current income and capital appreciation.
Manager Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC
Subadviser Wells Capital Management Incorporated
Portfolio managers Kandarp R. Acharya, CFA®, FRM, Petros N. Bocray, CFA®, FRM, Christian L. Chan, CFA®
    
Average annual total returns (%) as of May 31, 2021
    Including sales charge   Excluding sales charge   Expense ratios1 (%)
  Inception date 1 year 5 year 10 year   1 year 5 year 10 year   Gross Net 2
Class A (WFMAX) 1-30-2004 12.06 6.58 6.19   18.90 7.85 6.82   1.36 1.15
Class C (WFBCX) 1-30-2004 17.01 7.04 6.01   18.01 7.04 6.01   2.11 1.90
Administrator Class (NVMBX) 11-11-1994   19.19 8.12 7.08   1.28 0.90
Institutional Class (WFMYX) 7-31-2018   19.35 8.18 7.11   1.03 0.80
Moderate Balanced Blended Index3   15.77 8.25 6.92  
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index4   -0.40 3.25 3.29  
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Short Treasury 9-12 Months Index5   0.26 1.53 0.91  
MSCI EAFE Index (Net)6   38.41 9.77 5.88  
Russell 1000® Growth Index7   39.92 22.07 16.98  
Russell 1000® Value Index8   44.38 12.33 11.51  
Russell 2000® Index9   64.56 16.01 11.86  
S&P 500 Index10   40.32 17.16 14.38  
Figures quoted represent past performance, which is no guarantee of future results, and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder may pay on an investment in a fund. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance shown without sales charges would be lower if sales charges were reflected. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted, which assumes the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. Current month-end performance is available on the Fund’s website, wfam.com.
Index returns do not include transaction costs associated with buying and selling securities, any mutual fund fees or expenses, or any taxes. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
For Class A shares, the maximum front-end sales charge is 5.75%. For Class C shares, the maximum contingent deferred sales charge is 1.00%. Performance including a contingent deferred sales charge assumes the sales charge for the corresponding time period. Administrator Class, and Institutional Class shares are sold without a front-end sales charge or contingent deferred sales charge.
1 Reflects the expense ratios as stated in the most recent prospectuses, which include the impact of 0.43% in acquired fund fees and expenses. The expense ratios shown are subject to change and may differ from the annualized expense ratios shown in the financial highlights of this report, which do not include acquired fund fees and expenses.
2 The manager has contractually committed through September 30, 2021, to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers at 1.15% for Class A, 1.90% for Class C, 0.90% for Administrator Class, and 0.80% for Institutional Class. Brokerage commissions, stamp duty fees, interest, taxes, acquired fund fees and expenses (if any) from funds in which the affiliated master portfolios and funds invest and from money market funds, and extraordinary expenses are excluded from the expense caps. All other acquired fund fees and expenses from the affiliated master portfolios are included in the expense caps. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. Without these caps, the Fund’s returns would have been lower. The expense ratio paid by an investor is the net expense ratio (the total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers) as stated in the prospectuses.
3 Source: Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC. The Moderate Balanced Blended Index is composed 45% of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, 15% of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Short Treasury 9-12 Months Index, 10% of the Russell 1000® Growth Index, 10% of the Russell 1000® Value Index, 10% of the S&P 500 Index, 6% of the MSCI EAFE Index (Net), and 4% of the Russell 2000® Index. You cannot invest directly in an index.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.

6  |  Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Growth of $10,000 investment as of May 31, 20211
1 The chart compares the performance of Class A shares for the most recent ten years with the Moderate Balanced Blended Index, Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Short Treasury 9-12 Months Index, MSCI EAFE Index (Net), Russell 1000® Growth Index, Russell 1000® Value Index, Russell 2000® Index and S&P 500 Index. The chart assumes a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in Class A shares and reflects all operating expenses and assumes the maximum initial sales charge of 5.75%.
Footnotes continued from previous page
4 The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based benchmark that measures the investment-grade, U.S. dollar– denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage pass-throughs), asset-backed securities, and commercial mortgage-backed securities. You cannot invest directly in an index.
5 The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Short Treasury 9–12 Months Index is an unmanaged index that includes aged U.S. Treasury bills, notes, and bonds with a remaining maturity from 9 up to (but not including) 12 months. It excludes zero-coupon STRIPS. You cannot invest directly in an index.
6 The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) Europe, Australasia, Far East (EAFE) Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the United States and Canada. Source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indexes or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI. You cannot invest directly in an index.
7 The Russell 1000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 companies with higher price/book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. You cannot invest directly in an index.
8 The Russell 1000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 companies with lower price/book ratios and lower forecasted growth values. You cannot invest directly in an index.
9 The Russell 2000® Index measures the performance of the 2,000 smallest companies in the Russell 3000® Index, which represents approximately 8% of the total market capitalization of the Russell 3000® Index. You cannot invest directly in an index.
10 The S&P 500 Index consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. It is a market-value weighted index with each stock’s weight in the index proportionate to its market value. You cannot invest directly in an index.
Balanced funds may invest in stocks and bonds. Stock values fluctuate in response to the activities of individual companies and general market and economic conditions. Bond values fluctuate in response to the financial condition of individual issuers, general market and economic conditions, and changes in interest rates. Changes in market conditions and government policies may lead to periods of heightened volatility in the bond market and reduced liquidity for certain bonds held by the fund. In general, when interest rates rise, bond values fall and investors may lose principal value. Interest rate changes and their impact on the fund and its share price can be sudden and unpredictable. The use of derivatives may reduce returns and/or increase volatility. Certain investment strategies tend to increase the total risk of an investment (relative to the broader market). This fund is exposed to mortgage- and asset-backed securities risk. Consult the Fund’s prospectus for additional information on these and other risks.

Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund  |  7


Performance highlights (unaudited)
MANAGER'S DISCUSSION
Fund highlights
The Fund outperformed the Moderate Balanced Blended Index for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021.
The Tactical Asset Allocation (TAA) overlay and an overweight to credit sectors within the fixed-income portfolio were the largest contributors to relative performance over the period.
Poor relative performance within the international portfolio was the largest detractor from performance over the period.
Stock markets posted remarkable gains as the world recuperated from the pandemic.
The 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021, saw strong results from the broad U.S. equity markets, as illustrated by the Russell 3000® Index’s* return of 43.91%. The broad foreign markets also did well, as reflected by the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net)'s** return of 42.78%. The broad U.S. fixed-income market, as represented by the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, posted a slightly negative return of -0.40%. However, that result does not show the dichotomy within the fixed-income markets. Long-maturity U.S. Treasury bonds, as captured by the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index***, declined 13.85% as long-term Treasury yields rose over the period. In contrast, high-yield bonds, as shown by the ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index, advanced 15.18% as credit spreads compressed over the period. Aided by unprecedented levels of monetary and fiscal stimulus, the economy staged an impressive recovery from the pandemic contraction, and risky assets performed very well.
Portfolio management made few changes to the underlying portfolio.
A number of underlying managers are employed within the international equity sleeve of the portfolio, and over the course of the year, two were replaced due to performance considerations. While the rest of the portfolio remained stable, we implemented three tactical allocation adjustments over the year. From May 2020 to November 2020, we held a dedicated position in high-yield bonds, and from September 2020 to May 2021, we held a dedicated position in U.S. industrials sector stocks. In March 2021, we established a position in U.S. energy stocks, and that position was still in effect at the end of the period.
Ten largest holdings (%) as of May 31, 20211
Wells Fargo Managed Fixed Income Portfolio 28.65
Wells Fargo Conservative Income Fund Institutional Class 14.35
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio 8.36
Wells Fargo Disciplined Large Cap Portfolio 8.26
Wells Fargo Large Company Value Portfolio 7.65
Wells Fargo Diversified Large Cap Growth Portfolio 7.63
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio 4.42
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio 3.84
Wells Fargo Disciplined International Developed Markets Portfolio 3.01
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio 2.04
1 Figures represent the percentage of the Fund's net assets. Holdings are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
The Fund’s TAA overlay was active throughout the year. On the heels of the large pandemic-related equity market sell-off that occurred just prior to the start of the period, we established a number of positions that gave us exposure to risky assets. Over the entire period, TAA activity contributed about 119 basis points (bps; 100 bps equal 1.00%) to performance. At the start of the period, we held a long position in an S&P 500 futures contract along with a paired trade that returned the excess performance of the Nasdaq 100 Index†† over the S&P 500 Index†††. We closed both of these trades in July 2020. In August 2020, we established a long position in a Nasdaq 100 contract and closed the trade in February 2021. In September 2020, we established a long position in U.S. industrials stocks and sold it in May 2021. In March 2021, we reestablished the long position in the S& P
 

* The Russell 3000® Index measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization, which represents approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market. You cannot invest directly in an index.
** The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) All Country World Index (ACWI) ex USA Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalizationweighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed and emerging markets, excluding the U.S. Source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indexes or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI. You cannot invest directly in an index.

* The Russell 3000® Index measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization, which represents approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market. You cannot invest directly in an index.
*** The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index measures U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate, nominal debt issued by the U.S. Treasury with 20+ years to maturity. Treasury bills are excluded by the maturity constraint, but are part of a separate Short Treasury Index. STRIPS are excluded from the index because their inclusion would result in double-counting. You cannot invest directly in an index.

* The Russell 3000® Index measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization, which represents approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market. You cannot invest directly in an index.
The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index of domestic and Yankee high-yield bonds. The index tracks the performance of high-yield securities traded in the U.S. bond market. You cannot invest directly in an index. Copyright 2021. ICE Data Indices, LLC. All rights reserved.

* The Russell 3000® Index measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization, which represents approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market. You cannot invest directly in an index.
†† The Nasdaq 100 Index is an unmanaged group of the 100 biggest companies listed on the Nasdaq Composite Index. The list is updated quarterly, and companies on this index are typically representative of technology-related industries, such as computer hardware and software products, telecommunications, biotechnology, and retail/wholesale trade. You cannot invest directly in an index.

* The Russell 3000® Index measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization, which represents approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market. You cannot invest directly in an index.
††† The S&P 500 Index consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. It is a market-value-weighted index with each stock's weight in the index proportionate to its market value. You cannot invest directly in an index.

8  |  Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund


Performance highlights (unaudited)
500 futures contract and it was still in place at the end of the period. While the aforementioned trades contributed to performance, the trades listed below detracted from performance. At the start of the period, we held a short British pound position. We closed this trade in late July 2020. At the start of the period, we also held a paired trade long the S&P 500 futures contract and short the Russell 2000 futures contract. We closed this trade in August 2020. In July 2020, we established another paired trade that was long the S&P 500 futures contract and short the Nikkei futures contract. We closed this trade in November 2020.
Allocation (%) as of May 31, 2021
  Neutral
allocation
Effective
allocation1
Bonds 60 50
Stocks 40 44
Effective cash 0 6
1 Effective allocation includes the effect of any tactical futures overlay that may be in place. Effective cash, if any, represents the net offset to such future positions. These amounts are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
On a relative basis, the majority of the underlying sleeves did well over the period. The largest core bond manager was overweight credit with respect to Treasury bonds. As Treasury bonds performed poorly over the period, this portfolio had the largest positive contribution to relative performance over the trailing 12 months. Our U.S. equity managers, particularly in the value and in the small-cap space, also added to performance on a relative basis. Managers in the international space had a slight detraction from relative performance.
Looking ahead, we are guardedly optimistic.
The massive amount of uncertainty we faced last year at this time has faded. While the daunting impacts of the virus, U.S. civil unrest, domestic politics, and geopolitical tensions are still very fresh in our mind’s eye, we increasingly see these issues in the rear-view mirror. The rollout of the vaccine, the reduction of political rhetoric, and a very accommodative Federal Reserve Board (Fed) have all helped calm fears. While COVID-19 cases are declining and America is returning to work, we are focused on understanding the economic impacts of the recent unprecedented monetary and fiscal policy effects on the portfolio. While we expect equity markets will continue to advance over the next 12 months, it may be at a much slower pace than over the past 12 months. We believe there are new risks around the corner. We are very concerned about future inflation and we are not fully convinced it is transitory in nature. The U.S. Treasury is issuing a large quantity of bonds, the Fed is purchasing a large quantity of bonds, and we continue to monitor closely the duration and credit composition of our fixed-income investments. There are many unknowns, and despite some optimism, we continue to monitor the situation very carefully.
 

Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund  |  9


Fund expenses (unaudited)
As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and contingent deferred sales charges (if any) on redemptions and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) and/or shareholder servicing fees, and other Fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period from December 1, 2020 to May 31, 2021.
Actual expenses
The “Actual” line of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the “Actual” line under the heading entitled “Expenses paid during period” for your applicable class of shares to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes
The “Hypothetical” line of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) and contingent deferred sales charges. Therefore, the “Hypothetical” line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
  Beginning
account value
12-1-2020
Ending
account value
5-31-2021
Expenses
paid during
the period1,2
Annualized net
expense ratio2
Class A        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,077.45 $5.59 1.08%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,019.55 $5.44 1.08%
Class C        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,071.83 $9.50 1.84%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,015.76 $9.25 1.84%
Administrator Class        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,077.08 $4.30 0.83%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,020.79 $4.18 0.83%
Institutional Class        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,079.64 $3.84 0.74%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,021.24 $3.73 0.74%
1 Expenses paid is equal to the annualized net expense ratio of each class multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one-half-year period).
2 Amounts reflect net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios in which the Fund invests.

10  |  Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Investment companies:  98.23%          
Affiliated master portfolios:  77.66%          
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio                 $   5,246,824
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio                  11,410,074
Wells Fargo Disciplined International Developed Markets Portfolio                   4,109,954
Wells Fargo Disciplined Large Cap Portfolio                  11,272,119
Wells Fargo Diversified Large Cap Growth Portfolio                  10,422,014
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio                   1,334,443
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio                   1,127,992
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio                   1,381,912
Wells Fargo Large Company Value Portfolio                  10,450,900
Wells Fargo Managed Fixed Income Portfolio                  39,120,373
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio                   6,035,049
Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio                   1,339,390
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio                   2,779,814
          106,030,858
Bond funds:  14.35%          
Wells Fargo Conservative Income Fund Institutional Class       1,952,695  19,585,535
Exchange-traded funds:  4.59%          
Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund          24,422   1,275,073
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF          35,424   2,720,563
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF          19,801   2,268,205
            6,263,841
Stock funds:  1.63%          
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6       31,228 1,110,160
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund Class R6       83,039 1,118,530
          2,228,690
Total Investment companies (Cost $113,455,228)         134,108,924
Total investments in securities (Cost $113,455,228) 98.23%       134,108,924
Other assets and liabilities, net 1.77       2,418,956
Total net assets 100.00%       $136,527,880
    
The issuer is an affiliate of the Fund as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund  |  11


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

Investments in affiliates
An affiliated investment is an investment in which the Fund owns at least 5% of the outstanding voting shares of the issuer or as a result of other relationships, such as the Fund and the issuer having the same investment manager. Transactions with issuers that were either affiliates of the Fund at the beginning of the period or the end of the period were as follows:
  Value,
beginning of
period
Purchases Sales
proceeds
Net
realized
gains
(losses) on
affiliated
Underlying
Funds
  Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses) on
affiliated
Underlying
Funds
  Value,
end of
period
  % of
net
assets
Investment companies                    
Bond funds                    
Wells Fargo Conservative Income Fund Institutional Class $18,653,995 $2,101,992 $(1,188,309) $ 172   $ 17,685   $19,585,535   14.35%
Stock funds                    
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6 1,069,244 28,103 (424,036) 114,171   322,678   1,110,160    
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund Class R6 1,035,794 35,406 (364,689) 34,589   377,430   1,118,530    
                2,228,690   1.63
        $148,932   $717,793   $21,814,225   15.98%
    
  Shares,
end of
period
Dividends from
affiliated
Underlying Funds
Investment companies    
Bond funds    
Wells Fargo Conservative Income Fund Institutional Class 1,952,695 $ 148,873
Stock funds    
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6 31,228 4,527
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund Class R6 83,039 29,487
    $182,887
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

12  |  Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

Transactions with the affiliated Master Portfolios were as follows:
  % of
ownership,
beginning
of period
% of
ownership,
end of
period
Net realized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Interest
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Dividends
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Affiliated
income
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Value,
end of
period
  % of
net
assets
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio 1.53% 1.28% $ 542,886   $ 1,470,574   $ 0   $ 81,741   $ 79   $ 5,246,824    
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio 0.18 0.20 260,835   (346,068)   169,232   0   305   11,410,074    
Wells Fargo Disciplined International Developed Markets Portfolio 2.18 2.01 883,867   352,450   0   106,146   1,180   4,109,954    
Wells Fargo Disciplined Large Cap Portfolio 3.21 3.42 715,429   2,439,686   0   152,861   627   11,272,119    
Wells Fargo Diversified Large Cap Growth Portfolio 4.03 3.65 1,726,330   1,095,256   0   68,844   330   10,422,014    
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio 0.19 0.14 370,311   244,339   0   1,612   396   1,334,443    
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio 0.53 0.62 133,336   238,637   0   28,460   10   1,127,992    
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio 0.00 0.19 101,610   231,735   0   34,178   10   1,381,912    
Wells Fargo High Yield Corporate Bond Portfolio 4.64 0.00 274,835   91,253   219,496   0   36   0    
Wells Fargo International Value Portfolio 0.50 0.00 (176,674)   1,012,217   0   75,933   690   0    
Wells Fargo Large Company Value Portfolio 3.93 3.61 3,821,370   (235,888)   0   175,683   125   10,450,900    
Wells Fargo Managed Fixed Income Portfolio 8.11 7.88 371,345   (406,163)   1,073,635   0   976   39,120,373    
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio 3.48 2.52 43,753   336,784   147,993   17,681   51   6,035,049    
Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio 0.10 0.10 376,989   220,442   0   5,882   120   1,339,390    
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio 0.65 0.45 327,792   1,352,128   0   40,101   259   2,779,814    
      $9,774,014   $8,097,382   $1,610,356   $789,122   $5,194   $106,030,858   77.66%
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund  |  13


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

Futures contracts
Description Number of
contracts
Expiration
date
Notional
cost
Notional
value
Unrealized
gains
  Unrealized
losses
Long              
Bloomberg Commodity Index 178 6-16-2021 $ 1,625,662 $ 1,650,060 $ 24,398   $ 0
E-Mini S&P 500 Index 17 6-18-2021 3,587,653 3,572,040 0   (15,613)
FTSE 100 Index 20 6-18-2021 1,992,257 1,995,658 3,401   0
IBEX 35 Index 54 6-18-2021 6,019,728 6,031,799 12,071   0
MSCI Emerging Markets Index 20 6-18-2021 1,334,753 1,360,900 26,147   0
Short              
Australian Dollars Futures (52) 6-14-2021 (4,017,196) (4,011,280) 5,916   0
Mini-DAX Futures (63) 6-18-2021 (5,601,677) (5,937,437) 0   (335,760)
10-Year U.S. Treasury Notes (90) 9-21-2021 (11,839,010) (11,874,375) 0   (35,365)
          $71,933   $(386,738)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

14  |  Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund


Statement of assets and liabilities—May 31, 2021
   
Assets  
Investments in affiliated Master Portfolios, at value (cost $86,200,537)

$ 106,030,858
Investments in unaffiliated Underlying Funds, at value (cost $6,232,647)

6,263,841
Investments in affiliated Underlying Funds, at value (cost $21,022,044)

21,814,225
Cash

121,773
Cash at broker segregated for futures contracts

2,736,937
Receivable for Fund shares sold

45,225
Receivable for dividends

8,266
Prepaid expenses and other assets

5,976
Total assets

137,027,101
Liabilities  
Payable for Fund shares redeemed

305,026
Payable for investments purchased

84,188
Shareholder report expenses payable

31,767
Shareholder servicing fees payable

25,146
Administration fees payable

18,060
Payable for daily variation margin on open futures contracts

13,825
Management fee payable

13,242
Distribution fee payable

4,844
Trustees’ fees and expenses payable

35
Accrued expenses and other liabilities

3,088
Total liabilities

499,221
Total net assets

$136,527,880
Net assets consist of  
Paid-in capital

$ 106,854,262
Total distributable earnings

29,673,618
Total net assets

$136,527,880
Computation of net asset value and offering price per share  
Net assets – Class A

$ 39,004,585
Shares outstanding – Class A1

1,663,636
Net asset value per share – Class A

$23.45
Maximum offering price per share – Class A2

$24.88
Net assets – Class C

$ 7,462,930
Shares outstanding – Class C1

327,670
Net asset value per share – Class C

$22.78
Net assets – Administrator Class

$ 72,032,723
Shares outstanding – Administrator Class1

3,035,868
Net asset value per share – Administrator Class

$23.73
Net assets – Institutional Class

$ 18,027,642
Shares outstanding – Institutional Class1

758,093
Net asset value per share – Institutional Class

$23.78
1 The Fund has an unlimited number of authorized shares
2 Maximum offering price is computed as 100/94.25 of net asset value. On investments of $50,000 or more, the offering price is reduced.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund  |  15


Statement of operations—year ended May 31, 2021
   
Investment income  
Interest allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios (net of foreign withholding taxes of $82)

$ 1,610,356
Dividends allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios (net of foreign withholding taxes of $31,020)

789,122
Dividends from affiliated Underlying Funds

182,887
Dividends from unaffiliated Underlying Funds

72,398
Affiliated income allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

5,194
Expenses allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

(492,793)
Waivers allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

44,921
Total investment income

2,212,085
Expenses  
Management fee

392,810
Administration fees  
Class A

74,493
Class C

16,199
Administrator Class

97,889
Institutional Class

16,186
Shareholder servicing fees  
Class A

88,658
Class C

19,270
Administrator Class

188,202
Distribution fee  
Class C

57,809
Custody and accounting fees

9,411
Professional fees

33,228
Registration fees

61,588
Shareholder report expenses

43,507
Trustees’ fees and expenses

21,079
Other fees and expenses

17,869
Total expenses

1,138,198
Less: Fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements  
Fund-level

(202,682)
Class A

(600)
Administrator Class

(132,653)
Institutional Class

(1,241)
Net expenses

801,022
Net investment income

1,411,063
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments  
Net realized gains on  
Securities transactions allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

9,774,014
Affiliated Underlying Funds

148,932
Unaffiliated securities

1,185,015
Futures contracts

2,483,094
Net realized gains on investments

13,591,055
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on  
Securities transactions allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

8,097,382
Affiliated Underlying Funds

717,793
Unaffiliated securities

31,194
Futures contracts

(1,172,236)
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

7,674,133
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

21,265,188
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

$22,676,251
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

16  |  Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund


Statement of changes in net assets
         
  Year ended
May 31, 2021
Year ended
May 31, 2020
Operations        
Net investment income

  $ 1,411,063   $ 2,007,092
Net realized gains on investments

  13,591,055   1,483,956
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

  7,674,133   3,601,837
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

  22,676,251   7,092,885
Distributions to shareholders from        
Net investment income and net realized gains        
Class A

  (2,015,996)   (949,542)
Class C

  (373,639)   (193,050)
Administrator Class

  (4,052,501)   (2,564,416)
Institutional Class

  (703,391)   (332,334)
Total distributions to shareholders

  (7,145,527)   (4,039,342)
Capital share transactions Shares   Shares  
Proceeds from shares sold        
Class A

330,272 7,438,398 314,459 6,582,803
Class C

49,296 1,081,638 80,214 1,612,864
Administrator Class

264,666 6,037,467 270,029 5,728,452
Institutional Class

285,163 6,638,262 112,688 2,401,546
    21,195,765   16,325,665
Reinvestment of distributions        
Class A

87,227 1,943,994 42,968 914,528
Class C

17,286 372,949 9,165 189,731
Administrator Class

179,103 4,041,113 118,939 2,558,445
Institutional Class

31,036 701,932 15,389 331,571
    7,059,988   3,994,275
Payment for shares redeemed        
Class A

(255,197) (5,746,787) (336,995) (6,989,591)
Class C

(129,801) (2,834,859) (128,163) (2,596,917)
Administrator Class

(1,129,791) (25,741,880) (470,413) (9,914,992)
Institutional Class

(54,941) (1,245,870) (61,855) (1,282,623)
    (35,569,396)   (20,784,123)
Net decrease in net assets resulting from capital share transactions

  (7,313,643)   (464,183)
Total increase in net assets

  8,217,081   2,589,360
Net assets        
Beginning of period

  128,310,799   125,721,439
End of period

  $136,527,880   $128,310,799
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund  |  17


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class A 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$20.87 $20.35 $22.73 $23.47 $22.51
Net investment income

0.25 0.30 0.36 1 0.29 0.28
Net realized and unrealized gains on investments

3.62 0.86 0.11 0.97 1.34
Total from investment operations

3.87 1.16 0.47 1.26 1.62
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.24) (0.35) (0.42) (0.32) (0.29)
Net realized gains

(1.05) (0.29) (2.43) (1.68) (0.37)
Total distributions to shareholders

(1.29) (0.64) (2.85) (2.00) (0.66)
Net asset value, end of period

$23.45 $20.87 $20.35 $22.73 $23.47
Total return2

18.90% 5.65% 2.68% 5.38% 7.33%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

1.24% 1.30% 1.31% 1.33% 1.32%
Net expenses

1.09% 1.08% 1.12% 1.13% 1.15%
Net investment income

0.93% 1.43% 1.65% 1.42% 1.25%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate3

119% 119% 191% 113% 114%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$39,005 $31,334 $30,132 $31,980 $36,679
    
* Ratios include only the net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios and do not include expenses from any other affiliated Underlying Funds. Net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios included in the ratios were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.34%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.37%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.40%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.44%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.46%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges.
3 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

18  |  Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class C 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$20.30 $19.80 $22.20 $22.97 $22.05
Net investment income

0.04 1 0.09 0.12 0.10 0.11 1
Net realized and unrealized gains on investments

3.55 0.88 0.18 0.95 1.32
Total from investment operations

3.59 0.97 0.30 1.05 1.43
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.06) (0.18) (0.27) (0.14) (0.14)
Net realized gains

(1.05) (0.29) (2.43) (1.68) (0.37)
Total distributions to shareholders

(1.11) (0.47) (2.70) (1.82) (0.51)
Net asset value, end of period

$22.78 $20.30 $19.80 $22.20 $22.97
Total return2

18.01% 4.89% 1.90% 4.56% 6.56%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

1.99% 2.05% 2.06% 2.08% 2.07%
Net expenses

1.84% 1.84% 1.87% 1.88% 1.90%
Net investment income

0.19% 0.69% 0.89% 0.66% 0.50%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate3

119% 119% 191% 113% 114%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$7,463 $7,935 $8,509 $10,260 $12,180
    
* Ratios include only the net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios and do not include expenses from any other affiliated Underlying Funds. Net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios included in the ratios were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.34%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.37%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.40%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.44%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.46%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges.
3 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund  |  19


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Administrator Class 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$21.10 $20.56 $22.94 $23.68 $22.70
Net investment income

0.38 0.35 1 0.41 1 0.38 0.35 1
Net realized and unrealized gains on investments

3.59 0.88 0.12 0.94 1.35
Total from investment operations

3.97 1.23 0.53 1.32 1.70
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.29) (0.40) (0.48) (0.38) (0.35)
Net realized gains

(1.05) (0.29) (2.43) (1.68) (0.37)
Total distributions to shareholders

(1.34) (0.69) (2.91) (2.06) (0.72)
Net asset value, end of period

$23.73 $21.10 $20.56 $22.94 $23.68
Total return

19.19% 5.94% 2.95% 5.59% 7.62%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

1.17% 1.22% 1.23% 1.25% 1.24%
Net expenses

0.84% 0.83% 0.87% 0.88% 0.90%
Net investment income

1.21% 1.69% 1.88% 1.67% 1.49%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate2

119% 119% 191% 113% 114%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$72,033 $78,538 $78,209 $112,302 $112,835
    
* Ratios include only the net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios and do not include expenses from any other affiliated Underlying Funds. Net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios included in the ratios were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.34%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.37%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.41%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.44%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.46%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

20  |  Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Institutional Class 2021 2020 2019 1
Net asset value, beginning of period

$21.14 $20.60 $23.24
Net investment income

0.42 0.37 2 0.37 2
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

3.58 0.88 (0.12)
Total from investment operations

4.00 1.25 0.25
Distributions to shareholders from      
Net investment income

(0.31) (0.42) (0.46)
Net realized gains

(1.05) (0.29) (2.43)
Total distributions to shareholders

(1.36) (0.71) (2.89)
Net asset value, end of period

$23.78 $21.14 $20.60
Total return3

19.35% 6.02% 1.72%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*      
Gross expenses

0.91% 0.97% 0.98%
Net expenses

0.74% 0.74% 0.75%
Net investment income

1.27% 1.78% 2.15%
Supplemental data      
Portfolio turnover rate4

119% 119% 191%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$18,028 $10,504 $8,871
    
* Ratios include only the net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios and do not include expenses from any other affiliated Underlying Funds. Net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios included in the ratios were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.34%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.37%
Year ended May 31, 20191 0.38%
    
1 For the period from July 31, 2018 (commencement of class operations) to May 31, 2019
2 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
3 Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.
4 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund  |  21


Notes to financial statements
1. ORGANIZATION
Wells Fargo Funds Trust (the "Trust"), a Delaware statutory trust organized on March 10, 1999, is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). As an investment company, the Trust follows the accounting and reporting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, Financial Services – Investment Companies. These financial statements report on the Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund (the "Fund") which is a diversified series of the Trust.
The Fund is a fund-of-funds that invests in various affiliated mutual funds (“Underlying Funds”) employing a multi-asset, multi-style investment approach designed to reduce the price and return volatility of the Fund and to provide more consistent returns. The Fund may also invest directly in securities. The Underlying Funds incur separate expenses in seeking to achieve their investment objectives. Investments in affiliated Underlying Funds may also include investments in one or more separate diversified portfolios (collectively, the “affiliated Master Portfolios”) of Wells Fargo Master Trust, a registered open-end management investment company. Each affiliated Master Portfolio directly acquires portfolio securities and the Fund acquires an indirect interest in those securities. The Fund accounts for its investments in the affiliated Master Portfolios as partnership investments and records on a daily basis its share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s income, expense and realized and unrealized gains and losses. The financial statements of the affiliated Master Portfolios are presented in separate financial statements and may be obtained free of charge by contacting Investor Services or by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov. The financial statements of the affiliated Master Portfolios are filed with the SEC under Wells Fargo Master Trust. The financial statements for all other affiliated Underlying Funds are also publicly available on the SEC website at sec.gov.
On February 23, 2021, Wells Fargo & Company announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management ("WFAM") to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. WFAM is the trade name used by the asset management businesses of Wells Fargo & Company and includes Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the investment manager to the Fund, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, both registered investment advisers providing sub-advisory services to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Fund's principal underwriter. As part of the transaction, Wells Fargo & Company will own a 9.9% equity interest and will continue to serve as an important client and distribution partner.
Consummation of the transaction will result in the automatic termination of the Fund's investment management agreement and subadvisory agreement. The Fund's Board of Trustees approved a new investment management and new subadvisory agreement and approved submitting the agreements to the Fund’s shareholders for approval at a special meeting of shareholders expected to be held on August 16, 2021. Shareholders of record of the Fund at the close of business on May 28, 2021 are entitled to vote at the meeting. If shareholders approve the new agreements, they would take effect upon the closing of the transaction. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
This shareholder report is not asking you for a proxy. A separate proxy statement with more detailed information about the transaction will be provided to Fund shareholders and should be reviewed carefully.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following significant accounting policies, which are consistently followed in the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund, are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Securities valuation
All investments are valued each business day as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4 p.m. Eastern Time), although the Fund may deviate from this calculation time under unusual or unexpected circumstances.
Investments in the affiliated Master Portfolios are valued daily based on each Fund’s proportionate share of each affiliated Master Portfolio’s net assets, which are also valued daily.
Debt securities are valued at the evaluated bid price provided by an independent pricing service (e.g. taking into account various factors, including yields, maturities, or credit ratings) or, if a reliable price is not available, the quoted bid price from an independent broker-dealer.

22  |  Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund


Notes to financial statements
Equity securities and futures contracts that are listed on a foreign or domestic exchange or market are valued at the official closing price or, if none, the last sales price. If no sale occurs on the principal exchange or market that day, a fair value price will be determined in accordance with the Fund’s Valuation Procedures.
Investments in underlying mutual funds are valued at net asset per share as reported by the Underlying Funds as of the close of the regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange on each day the exchange is open for trading.
Investments which are not valued using any of the methods discussed above are valued at their fair value, as determined in good faith by the Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees has established a Valuation Committee comprised of the Trustees and has delegated to it the authority to take any actions regarding the valuation of portfolio securities that the Valuation Committee deems necessary or appropriate, including determining the fair value of portfolio securities, unless the determination has been delegated to the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee at Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC ("Funds Management"). The Board of Trustees retains the authority to make or ratify any valuation decisions or approve any changes to the Valuation Procedures as it deems appropriate. On a quarterly basis, the Board of Trustees receives reports on any valuation actions taken by the Valuation Committee or the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee which may include items for ratification.
Futures contracts
Futures contracts are agreements between the Fund and a counterparty to buy or sell a specific amount of a commodity, financial instrument or currency at a specified price on a specified date. The Fund may buy and sell futures contracts in order to gain exposure to, or protect against, changes in interest rates, security values and foreign exchange rates and is subject to interest rate risk, equity price risk and foreign currency risk. The primary risks associated with the use of futures contracts are the imperfect correlation between changes in market values of securities held by the Fund and the prices of futures contracts, and the possibility of an illiquid market. Futures contracts are generally entered into on a regulated futures exchange and cleared through a clearinghouse associated with the exchange. With futures contracts, there is minimal counterparty risk to the Fund since futures contracts are exchange traded and the exchange’s clearinghouse, as the counterparty to all exchange traded futures, guarantees the futures contracts against default.
Upon entering into a futures contract, the Fund is required to deposit either cash or securities (initial margin) with the broker in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the contract value. Subsequent payments (variation margin) are paid to or from the broker each day equal to the daily changes in the contract value. Such payments are recorded as unrealized gains or losses and, if any, shown as variation margin receivable (payable) in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Should the Fund fail to make requested variation margin payments, the broker can gain access to the initial margin to satisfy the Fund’s payment obligations. When the contracts are closed, a realized gain or loss is recorded in the Statement of Operations.
Investment transactions, income and expenses
Investments in the affiliated Master Portfolios are recorded on a trade date basis. The Fund records daily its proportionate share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s income, expenses and realized and unrealized gains or losses. The Fund also accrues its own expenses.
Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains or losses are recorded on the basis of identified cost.
Income dividends and capital gain distributions from investment companies are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Capital gain distributions from investment companies are treated as realized gains.
Distributions to shareholders
Distributions to shareholders from net investment income and any net realized gains are recorded on the ex-dividend date and paid at least annually. Such distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations and may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Dividend sources are estimated at the time of declaration. The tax character of distributions is determined as of the Fund's fiscal year end. Therefore, a portion of the Fund's distributions made prior to the Fund’s fiscal year end may be categorized as a tax return of capital at year end.
Federal and other taxes
The Fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by distributing substantially all of its investment company taxable income and any net realized capital gains (after reduction for capital loss carryforwards) sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes. Accordingly, no provision for federal income taxes was required.
The Fund’s income and federal excise tax returns and all financial records supporting those returns for the prior three fiscal years are subject to examination by the federal and Delaware revenue authorities. Management has analyzed the Fund's tax

Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund  |  23


Notes to financial statements
positions taken on federal, state, and foreign tax returns for all open tax years and does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability.
As of May 31, 2021, the aggregate cost of all investments for federal income tax purposes was $112,445,766 and the unrealized gains (losses) consisted of:
Gross unrealized gains $21,373,079
Gross unrealized losses (24,726)
Net unrealized gains $21,348,353
Reclassifications are made to the Fund’s capital accounts for permanent tax differences to reflect income and gains available for distribution (or available capital loss carryforwards) under federal income tax regulations. U.S. generally accepted accounting principles require that certain components of net assets be adjusted to reflect permanent differences between financial and tax reporting. These reclassifications have no effect on net assets or net asset values per share. The primary permanent difference causing such reclassification is due to recognition of partnership income. At May 31, 2021, as a result of permanent book-to-tax differences, the following reclassification adjustments were made on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities:
Paid-in capital Total distributable
earnings
$(235,705) $235,705
Class allocations
The separate classes of shares offered by the Fund differ principally in applicable sales charges, distribution, shareholder servicing, and administration fees. Class specific expenses are charged directly to that share class. Investment income, common fund-level expenses, and realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative proportion of net assets of each class.
3. FAIR VALUATION MEASUREMENTS
Fair value measurements of investments are determined within a framework that has established a fair value hierarchy based upon the various data inputs utilized in determining the value of the Fund’s investments. The three-level hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The Fund’s investments are classified within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The inputs are summarized into three broad levels as follows:
Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical securities
Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs or methodologies used for valuing investments in securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.

24  |  Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund


Notes to financial statements
The following is a summary of the inputs used in valuing the Fund’s assets and liabilities as of May 31, 2021:
  Quoted prices
(Level 1)
Other significant
observable inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
unobservable inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Assets        
Investments in:        
Investment companies $ 28,078,066 $0 $0 $ 28,078,066
Investments measured at net asset value*       106,030,858
  28,078,066 0 0 134,108,924
Futures contracts 71,933 0 0 71,933
Total assets $28,149,999 $0 $0 $134,180,857
Liabilities        
Futures contracts $ 386,738 $0 $0 $ 386,738
Total liabilities $ 386,738 $0 $0 $ 386,738
    
* Investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amount presented in the table is intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The Fund’s investments in the affiliated Master Portfolios are valued at $106,030,858. Each affiliated Master Portfolio does not have a redemption period notice, can be redeemed daily and does not have any unfunded commitments.
Futures contracts are reported at their cumulative unrealized gains (losses) at measurement date as reported in the table following the Portfolio of Investments. For futures contracts, the current day’s variation margin is reported on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. All other assets and liabilities are reported at their market value at measurement date.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the Fund did not have any transfers into/out of Level 3.
The investment objective of each affiliated Master Portfolio is as follows:
Affiliated Master Portfolio Investment objective
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio Seeks maximum long-term total return (current income and capital appreciation), consistent with minimizing risk to principal
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio Seeks total return, consisting of income and capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Disciplined International Developed Markets Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Disciplined Large Cap Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Diversified Large Cap Growth Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Large Company Value Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Managed Fixed Income Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio Seeks returns that exceed the rate of inflation over the long-term
Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
4. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
Management fee
Funds Management, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company ("Wells Fargo"), is the manager of the Fund and provides advisory and fund-level administrative services under an investment management agreement. Under the

Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund  |  25


Notes to financial statements
investment management agreement, Funds Management is responsible for, among other services, implementing the investment objectives and strategies of the Fund, supervising the subadviser and providing fund-level administrative services in connection with the Fund’s operations. As compensation for its services under the investment management agreement, Funds Management is entitled to receive a management fee at the following annual rate based on the Fund’s average daily net assets:
Average daily net assets Management fee
First $500 million 0.300%
Next $500 million 0.280
Next $2 billion 0.260
Next $2 billion 0.240
Next $5 billion 0.230
Over $10 billion 0.220
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the management fee was equivalent to an annual rate of 0.30% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
Funds Management has retained the services of a subadviser to provide daily portfolio management to the Fund. The fee for subadvisory services is borne by Funds Management. Wells Capital Management Incorporated, an affiliate of Funds Management and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo, is the subadviser to the Fund and is entitled to receive a fee from Funds Management at an annual rate starting at 0.10% and declining to 0.05% as the average daily net assets of the Fund increase.
Funds Management also serves as the adviser to each affiliated Master Portfolio and is entitled to receive a fee from each affiliated Master Portfolio for those services.
Administration fees
Under a class-level administration agreement, Funds Management provides class-level administrative services to the Fund, which includes paying fees and expenses for services provided by the transfer agent, sub-transfer agents, omnibus account servicers and record-keepers. As compensation for its services under the class-level administration agreement, Funds Management receives an annual fee which is calculated based on the average daily net assets of each class as follows:
  Class-level
administration fee
Class A 0.21%
Class C 0.21
Administrator Class 0.13
Institutional Class 0.13
Waivers and/or expense reimbursements
Funds Management has contractually waived and/or reimbursed management and administration fees to the extent necessary to maintain certain net operating expense ratios for the Fund. When each class of the Fund has exceeded its expense cap, Funds Management has waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses from fund-level expenses on a proportionate basis and then from class specific expenses. When only certain classes exceed their expense caps, waivers and/or reimbursements are applied against class specific expenses before fund-level expenses. Net expenses from the affiliated Master Portfolios are included in the expense caps. Funds Management has committed through September 30, 2021 to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap expenses. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. The contractual expense caps are as follows:

26  |  Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund


Notes to financial statements
  Expense ratio caps
Class A 1.15%
Class C 1.90
Administrator Class 0.90
Institutional Class 0.80
Distribution fee
The Trust has adopted a distribution plan for Class C shares of the Fund pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. A distribution fee is charged to Class C shares and paid to Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC ("Funds Distributor"), the principal underwriter, at an annual rate of 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class C shares.
In addition, Funds Distributor is entitled to receive the front-end sales charge from the purchase of Class A shares and a contingent deferred sales charge on the redemption of certain Class A shares. Funds Distributor is also entitled to receive the contingent deferred sales charges from redemptions of Class C shares. For the year ended May 31, 2021, Funds Distributor received $6,722 from the sale of Class A shares. No contingent deferred sales charges were incurred by Class A and Class C shares for the year ended May 31, 2021.
Shareholder servicing fees
The Trust has entered into contracts with one or more shareholder servicing agents, whereby Class A, Class C, and Administrator Class of the Fund are charged a fee at an annual rate of 0.25% of the average daily net assets of each respective class. A portion of these total shareholder servicing fees were paid to affiliates of Wells Fargo.
5. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS
The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing in affiliated Master Portfolios. Purchases and sales related to these investments have been calculated by aggregating the results of multiplying the Fund's ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. Purchase and sales in Underlying Funds and unaffiliated securities in which the Fund invests are actual purchases and sales of those investments. Purchases and sales of investments, excluding short-term securities, for the year ended May 31, 2021 were as follows:
Purchases at cost   Sales proceeds
U.S.
government
Non-U.S.
government
  U.S.
government
Non-U.S.
government
$66,813,111 $69,851,332   $56,796,010 $74,904,732
6. DERIVATIVE TRANSACTIONS
During the year ended May 31, 2021, the Fund entered into futures contracts to gain market exposure to certain asset classes consistent with its asset allocation strategy. The Fund had an average notional amount of $16,598,172 in long futures contracts and $14,604,641 in short futures contracts during the year ended May 31, 2021.
A summary of the location of derivative instruments on the financial statements by primary risk exposure is outlined in the following tables.

Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund  |  27


Notes to financial statements
The fair value of derivative instruments as of May 31, 2021 by primary risk type was as follows for the Fund:
  Asset derivatives   Liability derivatives
  Statement of
Assets and Liabilities location
Fair value   Statement of
Assets and Liabilities location
Fair value
Interest rate risk Unrealized gains on futures contracts $ 0*   Unrealized losses on futures contracts $ 35,365*
Equity risk Unrealized gains on futures contracts 66,017*   Unrealized losses on futures contracts 351,373*
Foreign currency risk Unrealized gains on futures contracts 5,916*   Unrealized losses on futures contracts 0*
    $71,933     $386,738
* Amount represents the cumulative unrealized gains (losses) as reported in the table following the Portfolio of Investments. For futures contracts, only the current day's variation margin as of May 31, 2021 is reported separately on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
The effect of derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations for the year ended May 31, 2021 was as follows:
  Amount of realized
gains (losses) on
derivatives
Change in unrealized
gains (losses) on
derivatives
Equity risk $ 2,590,947 $ (1,200,306)
Interest rate risk 234,224 (35,365)
Foreign currency risk (342,077) 63,435
  $2,483,094 $(1,172,236)
7. BANK BORROWINGS
The Trust (excluding the money market funds), Wells Fargo Master Trust and Wells Fargo Variable Trust are parties to a $350,000,000 revolving credit agreement whereby the Fund is permitted to use bank borrowings for temporary or emergency purposes, such as to fund shareholder redemption requests. Interest under the credit agreement is charged to the Fund based on a borrowing rate equal to the higher of the Federal Funds rate in effect on that day plus 1.25% or the overnight LIBOR rate in effect on that day plus 1.25%. In addition, an annual commitment fee equal to 0.25% of the unused balance is allocated to each participating fund.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, there were no borrowings by the Fund under the agreement.
8. DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS
The tax character of distributions paid during the years ended May 31, 2021 and May 31, 2020 were as follows:
  Year ended May 31
  2021 2020
Ordinary income $3,486,043 $2,511,754
Long-term capital gain 3,659,484 1,527,588
As of May 31, 2021, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Undistributed
ordinary
income
Undistributed
long-term
gain
Unrealized
gains
$6,344,365 $1,980,900 $21,348,353

28  |  Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund


Notes to financial statements
9. INDEMNIFICATION
Under the Fund's organizational documents, the officers and Trustees have been granted certain indemnification rights against certain liabilities that may arise out of performance of their duties to the Fund. The Fund has entered into a separate agreement with each Trustee that converts indemnification rights currently existing under the Fund’s organizational documents into contractual rights that cannot be changed in the future without the consent of the Trustee. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with service providers that contain a variety of indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent on future claims that may be made against the Fund and, therefore, cannot be estimated.
10. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
In August 2018, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 updates the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Management has adopted this guidance which did not have a material impact on the financial statements.
11. CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization announced that it had made the assessment that coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) is a pandemic. The impacts of COVID-19 are affecting the entire global economy, individual companies and investment products, the funds, and the market in general. There is significant uncertainty around the extent and duration of business disruptions related to COVID-19 and the impacts may last for an extended period of time. COVID-19 has led to significant uncertainty and volatility in the financial markets.
12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
At a meeting held July 15, 2021, the Board of Trustees of the Wells Fargo Funds approved a change in the Fund's name to remove “Wells Fargo” from the Fund's name and replace with “Allspring”. The change is expected to go into effect on October 11, 2021.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) announced that it will be changing its company name to Allspring Global Investments upon the closing of the previously announced sale transaction of WFAM by Wells Fargo & Company to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. The new corporate name is expected to go into effect on the closing date of the transaction, which is anticipated to occur in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
Following the closing of the transaction, Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the Fund's investment manager, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, each sub-advisers to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Fund's principal underwriter, will each be rebranded as Allspring.

Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund  |  29


Report of independent registered public accounting firm
To the Shareholders of the Fund and Board of Trustees
Wells Fargo Funds Trust:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund (the Fund), one of the funds constituting Wells Fargo Funds Trust, including the portfolio of investments, as of May 31, 2021, the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the financial statements) and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended. In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of May 31, 2021, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Fund in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and financial highlights, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. Such procedures also included confirmation of securities owned as of May 31, 2021, by correspondence with the custodian, transfer agent and brokers, or by other appropriate auditing procedures. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and financial highlights. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have not been able to determine the specific year that we began serving as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies; however, we are aware that we have served as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies since at least 1955.
Boston, Massachusetts
July 28, 2021

30  |  Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund


Other information (unaudited)
TAX INFORMATION
For corporate shareholders, pursuant to Section 854 of the Internal Revenue Code, 9% of ordinary income dividends qualify for the corporate dividends-received deduction for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 852 of the Internal Revenue Code, $3,659,484 was designated as a 20% rate gain distribution for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 854 of the Internal Revenue Code, $402,250 of income dividends paid during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 has been designated as qualified dividend income (QDI).
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, $1,158,807 has been designated as interest-related dividends for nonresident alien shareholders pursuant to Section 871 of the Internal Revenue Code.
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, $2,003,104 has been designated as short-term capital gain dividends for nonresident alien shareholders pursuant to Section 871 of the Internal Revenue Code.
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, 2% of the ordinary income distributed was derived from interest on U.S. government securities.
For corporate shareholders, pursuant to Section 163(j) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26% of ordinary income dividends qualify as interest dividends for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021.
PROXY VOTING INFORMATION
A description of the policies and procedures used to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-222-8222, visiting our website at wfam.com, or visiting the SEC website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the proxies related to portfolio securities were voted during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the website at wfam.com or by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS INFORMATION
The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year as an exhibit to its reports on Form N-PORT. Shareholders may view the filed Form N-PORT by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov.

Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund  |  31


Other information (unaudited)
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS
Each of the Trustees and Officers listed in the table below acts in identical capacities for each fund in the Wells Fargo family of funds, which consists of 139 mutual funds comprising the Wells Fargo Funds Trust, Wells Fargo Variable Trust, Wells Fargo Master Trust and four closed-end funds (collectively the “Fund Complex”). This table should be read in conjunction with the Prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information1. The mailing address of each Trustee and Officer is 525 Market Street, 12th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105. Each Trustee and Officer serves an indefinite term, however, each Trustee serves such term until reaching the mandatory retirement age established by the Trustees.
Independent Trustees
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service*
Principal occupations during past five years or longer Current other
public company or
investment
company
directorships
William R. Ebsworth
(Born 1957)
Trustee,
since 2015
Retired. From 1984 to 2013, equities analyst, portfolio manager, research director and chief investment officer at Fidelity Management and Research Company in Boston, Tokyo, and Hong Kong, and retired in 2013 as Chief Investment Officer of Fidelity Strategic Advisers, Inc. where he led a team of investment professionals managing client assets. Prior thereto, Board member of Hong Kong Securities Clearing Co., Hong Kong Options Clearing Corp., the Thailand International Fund, Ltd., Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company, and Empire Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company. Audit Committee Chair and Investment Committee Chair of the Vincent Memorial Hospital Endowment (non-profit organization). Mr. Ebsworth is a CFA® charterholder. N/A
Jane A. Freeman
(Born 1953)
Trustee,
since 2015;
Chair Liaison,
since 2018
Retired. From 2012 to 2014 and 1999 to 2008, Chief Financial Officer of Scientific Learning Corporation. From 2008 to 2012, Ms. Freeman provided consulting services related to strategic business projects. Prior to 1999, Portfolio Manager at Rockefeller & Co. and Scudder, Stevens & Clark. Board member of the Harding Loevner Funds from 1996 to 2014, serving as both Lead Independent Director and chair of the Audit Committee. Board member of the Russell Exchange Traded Funds Trust from 2011 to 2012 and the chair of the Audit Committee. Ms. Freeman is also an inactive Chartered Financial Analyst. N/A
Isaiah Harris, Jr.
(Born 1952)
Trustee,
since 2009; Audit
Committee
Chair,
since 2019
Retired. Chairman of the Board of CIGNA Corporation since 2009, and Director since 2005. From 2003 to 2011, Director of Deluxe Corporation. Prior thereto, President and CEO of BellSouth Advertising and Publishing Corp. from 2005 to 2007, President and CEO of BellSouth Enterprises from 2004 to 2005 and President of BellSouth Consumer Services from 2000 to 2003. Emeritus member of the Iowa State University Foundation Board of Governors. Emeritus Member of the Advisory Board of Iowa State University School of Business. Advisory Board Member, Palm Harbor Academy (private school). Mr. Harris is a certified public accountant (inactive status). CIGNA Corporation
Judith M. Johnson
(Born 1949)
Trustee,
since 2008
Retired. Prior thereto, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund from 1996 to 2008. Ms. Johnson is an attorney, certified public accountant and a certified managerial accountant. N/A
David F. Larcker
(Born 1950)
Trustee,
since 2009
James Irvin Miller Professor of Accounting at the Graduate School of Business (Emeritus), Stanford University, Director of the Corporate Governance Research Initiative and Senior Faculty of The Rock Center for Corporate Governance since 2006. From 2005 to 2008, Professor of Accounting at the Graduate School of Business, Stanford University. Prior thereto, Ernst & Young Professor of Accounting at The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania from 1985 to 2005. N/A

32  |  Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund


Other information (unaudited)
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service*
Principal occupations during past five years or longer Current other
public company or
investment
company
directorships
Olivia S. Mitchell
(Born 1953)
Trustee,
since 2006;
Nominating and
Governance
Committee Chair,
since 2018
International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans Professor, Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania since 1993. Director of Wharton’s Pension Research Council and Boettner Center on Pensions & Retirement Research, and Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. Previously, Cornell University Professor from 1978 to 1993. N/A
Timothy J. Penny
(Born 1951)
Trustee,
since 1996;
Chair,
since 2018
President and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Minnesota Initiative Foundation, a non-profit organization, since 2007. Member of the Board of Trustees of NorthStar Education Finance, Inc., a non-profit organization, since 2007. N/A
James G. Polisson
(Born 1959)
Trustee,
since 2018
Retired. Chief Marketing Officer, Source (ETF) UK Services, Ltd, from 2015 to 2017. From 2012 to 2015, Principal of The Polisson Group, LLC, a management consulting, corporate advisory and principal investing company. Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director at Russell Investments, Global Exchange Traded Funds from 2010 to 2012. Managing Director of Barclays Global Investors from 1998 to 2010 and Global Chief Marketing Officer for iShares and Barclays Global Investors from 2000 to 2010. Trustee of the San Francisco Mechanics’ Institute, a non-profit organization, from 2013 to 2015. Board member of the Russell Exchange Traded Fund Trust from 2011 to 2012. Director of Barclays Global Investors Holdings Deutschland GmbH from 2006 to 2009. Mr. Polisson is an attorney and has a retired status with the Massachusetts and District of Columbia Bar Associations. N/A
Pamela Wheelock
(Born 1959)
Trustee,
since January
2020; previously
Trustee from
January 2018 to
July 2019
Board member of the Destination Medical Center Economic Development Agency, Rochester, Minnesota since 2019. Interim President of the McKnight Foundation from January to September 2020. Acting Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Human Services, July 2019 through September 2019. Human Services Manager (part-time), Minnesota Department of Human Services, October 2019 through December 2019. Chief Operating Officer, Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity from 2017 to 2019. Vice President of University Services, University of Minnesota from 2012 to 2016. Prior thereto, on the Board of Directors, Governance Committee and Finance Committee for the Minnesota Philanthropy Partners (Saint Paul Foundation) from 2012 to 2018, Interim Chief Executive Officer of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota from 2011 to 2012, Chairman of the Board from 2009 to 2012 and Board Director from 2003 to 2015. Vice President, Leadership and Community Engagement, Bush Foundation, Saint Paul, Minnesota (a private foundation) from 2009 to 2011. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Minnesota Sports and Entertainment from 2004 to 2009 and Senior Vice President from 2002 to 2004. Executive Vice President of the Minnesota Wild Foundation from 2004 to 2008. Commissioner of Finance, State of Minnesota, from 1999 to 2002. Currently Board Chair of the Minnesota Wild Foundation since 2010. N/A
*  Length of service dates reflect the Trustee’s commencement of service with the Trust’s predecessor entities, where applicable.

Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund  |  33


Other information (unaudited)
Officers
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service
Principal occupations during past five years or longer
Andrew Owen
(Born 1960)
President,
since 2017
Executive Vice President of Wells Fargo & Company and Head of Affiliated Managers, Wells Fargo Asset Management, since 2014. In addition, Mr. Owen is currently President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC since 2017. Prior thereto, Executive Vice President responsible for marketing, investments and product development for Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, from 2009 to 2014.
Jeremy DePalma
(Born 1974)
Treasurer,
since 2012
(for certain funds in
the Fund Complex);
since 2021 (for
the remaining funds in the
Fund Complex)
Senior Vice President of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC since 2009. Senior Vice President of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC from 2008 to 2010 and head of the Fund Reporting and Control Team within Fund Administration from 2005 to 2010.
Michelle Rhee
(Born 1966)
Chief Legal Officer,
since 2019
Secretary of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC and Chief Legal Counsel of Wells Fargo Asset Management since 2018. Deputy General Counsel of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. since 2020 and Assistant General Counsel of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. from 2018 to 2020. Associate General Counsel and Managing Director of Bank of America Corporation from 2004 to 2018.
Catherine Kennedy
(Born 1969)
Secretary,
since 2019
Vice President of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC and Senior Counsel of the Wells Fargo Legal Department since 2010. Vice President and Senior Counsel of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC from 1998 to 2010.
Michael H. Whitaker
(Born 1967)
Chief Compliance Officer,
since 2016
Chief Compliance Officer of Wells Fargo Asset Management since 2016. Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer for Fidelity Investments from 2007 to 2016.
1  The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about the Trustees and is available, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-222-8222 or by visiting the website at wfam.com.

34  |  Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund


Other information (unaudited)
LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
In accordance with Rule 22e-4 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Liquidity Rule”), Wells Fargo Funds Trust (the “Trust”) has adopted and implemented a liquidity risk management program (the “Program”) on behalf of each of its series, including the Fund, which is reasonably designed to assess and manage the Fund's liquidity risk. “Liquidity risk” is defined under the Liquidity Rule as the risk that the Fund is unable to meet redemption requests without significantly diluting remaining investors’ interests in the Fund. The Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”) previously approved the designation of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”), the Fund's investment manager, as the administrator of the Program, and Funds Management has established a Liquidity Risk Management Council (the "Council") composed of personnel from multiple departments within Funds Management and its affiliates to assist Funds Management in the implementation and on-going administration of the Program.
The Program is comprised of various components designed to support the assessment and/or management of liquidity risk, including: (1) the periodic assessment (no less frequently than annually) of certain factors that influence the Fund's liquidity risk; (2) the periodic classification (no less frequently than monthly) of the Fund's investments into one of four liquidity categories that reflect an estimate of their liquidity under current market conditions; (3) a 15% limit on the acquisition of “illiquid investments” (as defined under the Liquidity Rule); (4) to the extent the Fund does not invest primarily in “highly liquid investments” (as defined under the Liquidity Rule), the determination of a minimum percentage of the Fund's assets that generally will be invested in highly liquid investments (an “HLIM”); (5) if the Fund has established an HLIM, the periodic review (no less frequently than annually) of the HLIM and the adoption of policies and procedures for responding to a shortfall of the Fund's “highly liquid investments” below its HLIM; and (6) periodic reporting to the Board.
At a meeting of the Board held on May 17-19, 2021, the Board received and reviewed a written report (the “Report”) from Funds Management that addressed the operation of the Program and assessed its adequacy and effectiveness for the period from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 (the “Reporting Period”). Among other things, the Report discussed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on liquidity and management of liquidity risk during the Reporting Period, including during the stressed market conditions caused by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. No significant liquidity events impacting the Fund were noted in the Report. As applicable to the Fund, there were no material changes to the Program during the Reporting Period.
Funds Management concluded in the Report that the Program is operating effectively to assess and manage the Fund’s liquidity risk, and that the Program has been and continues to be adequately and effectively implemented to monitor and, as applicable, respond to the Fund’s liquidity developments.
There can be no assurance that the Program will achieve its objectives under all circumstances in the future. Please refer to the Fund’s prospectus for more information regarding the Fund’s exposure to liquidity risk and other risks to which an investment in the Fund may be subject.

Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund  |  35


Board considerations (unaudited)
BOARD CONSIDERATION OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AND SUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENTS:
Board Considerations – Current Agreements
Under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Wells Fargo Funds Trust (the “Trust”) must determine annually whether to approve the continuation of the Trust’s investment management and sub-advisory agreements. In this regard, at a Board meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Meeting”), the Board, all the members of which have no direct or indirect interest in the investment management and sub-advisory agreements and are not “interested persons” of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), reviewed and approved for Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund (the “Fund”): (i) an investment management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”); and (ii) an investment sub-advisory agreement (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Wells Capital Management Incorporated (the “Sub-Adviser”), an affiliate of Funds Management. The Management Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement are collectively referred to as the “Advisory Agreements.”
The Board noted that Wells Fargo & Company recently announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”), which includes Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser, to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. and/or their affiliates (the “Transaction”). The Board further noted that the Transaction would result in a change-of-control of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser, which would be considered to be an assignment that would result in the termination of the Advisory Agreements. In light of the Transaction, the Board separately considered for approval a new investment management agreement with Funds Management and a new sub-advisory agreement with the Sub-Adviser (the “New Agreements”) that would replace the Advisory Agreements upon consummation of the Transaction, subject to approval of the New Agreements by the Fund’s shareholders. The Board also considered for approval interim agreements to go into effect in the event shareholders do not approve the New Agreements before the Transaction is completed. The interim agreements would allow the Manager and the Sub-Adviser to continue providing services to the Fund while the Fund continues to seek shareholder approval of the New Agreements. The Board noted that the terms of the interim agreements would be identical to those of the current Advisory Agreements, except for the term and certain escrow provisions.
At the Meeting, the Board considered the factors and reached the conclusions described below relating to the selection of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser and the approval of the Advisory Agreements. Prior to the Meeting, including at Board meetings held in April and May 2021, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with representatives of Funds Management about these matters. Also, the Board has adopted a team-based approach, with each team consisting of a sub-set of Trustees, to assist the full Board in the discharge of its duties in reviewing investment performance and other matters throughout the year. The Independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Advisory Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately.
In providing information to the Board, Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser were guided by a detailed set of requests for information submitted to them by independent legal counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees at the start of the Board’s annual contract renewal process earlier in 2021. In considering and approving the Advisory Agreements, the Trustees considered the information they believed relevant, including but not limited to the information discussed below. The Board considered not only the specific information presented in connection with the Meeting, but also the knowledge gained over time through interaction with Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser about various topics. In this regard, the Board reviewed reports of Funds Management at each of its quarterly meetings, which included, among other things, portfolio reviews and investment performance reports. In addition, the Board and the teams mentioned above confer with portfolio managers at various times throughout the year. The Board did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each individual Trustee may have attributed different weights to various factors.
After its deliberations, the Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser under each of the Advisory Agreements was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Advisory Agreements for a one-year term. The Board considered the approval of the Advisory Agreements for the Fund as part of its consideration of agreements for funds across the complex, but its approvals were made on a fund-by-fund basis. The following summarizes a number of important, but not necessarily all, factors considered by the Board in support of its approvals.
Nature, extent and quality of services
The Board received and considered various information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser under the Advisory Agreements. This information included a description of the investment advisory services and Fund-level administrative services covered by the Management Agreement, as well as, among other things, a summary of the background and experience of senior management of WFAM, of which Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser are a part, and a summary of investments made in the business of WFAM. The Board also received a description of

36  |  Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
Funds Management’s and the Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans, including a summary of the performance of such plans and any changes thereto during the COVID-19 pandemic, and of their approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity. The Board also received and reviewed information about Funds Management’s role as administrator of the Fund’s liquidity risk management program, Funds Management’s approach to risk management, and Funds Management’s intermediary and vendor oversight program.
The Board also considered the qualifications, background, tenure and responsibilities of each of the portfolio managers primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the Fund. The Board evaluated the ability of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser to attract and retain qualified investment professionals, including research, advisory and supervisory personnel.
The Board further considered the compliance programs and compliance records of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser. In addition, the Board took into account the full range of services provided to the Fund by Funds Management and its affiliates. The Board also considered information about retention and back-up arrangements that have been put into place with respect to key personnel of WFAM in connection with the anticipated Transaction, noting that WFAM provided assurances that the announcement and eventual culmination of the Transaction is not expected to result in any diminution in the nature or quality of services provided to the Fund.
Fund investment performance and expenses
The Board considered the investment performance results for the Fund over various time periods ended December 31, 2020. The Board considered these results in comparison to the investment performance of funds in a universe that was determined by Broadridge Inc. (“Broadridge”) to be similar to the Fund (the “Universe”), and in comparison to the Fund’s benchmark index and to other comparative data. Broadridge is an independent provider of investment company data. The Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the performance Universe. The Board noted that the investment performance of the Fund (Administrator Class) was higher than the average investment performance of the Universe for the one-year, three- and ten-year periods under review, and was lower than the average investment performance of the Universe for the five-year period under review. The Board also noted that the investment performance of the Fund was lower than its benchmark index, the Moderate Balanced Blended Index, for the three-year and five-year periods under review, higher than its benchmark index for the one-year period under review, and in range of its benchmark index for the ten-year period under review.
The Board received information concerning, and discussed factors contributing to, the underperformance of the Fund relative to the Universe and benchmark for the periods identified above. The Board took note of the explanations for the relative underperformance during these periods, including with respect to investment decisions and market factors that affected the Fund’s investment performance.
The Board also received and considered information regarding the Fund’s net operating expense ratios and their various components, including actual management fees, custodian and other non-management fees, and Rule 12b-1 and non-Rule 12b-1 shareholder service fees. The Board considered these ratios in comparison to the median ratios of funds in class-specific expense groups that were determined by Broadridge to be similar to the Fund (the “Groups”). The Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the expense Groups and an explanation of how funds comprising expense groups and their expense ratios may vary from year-to-year. Based on the Broadridge reports, the Board noted that the net operating expense ratios of the Fund were either in range of or equal to the median net operating expense ratios of the expense Groups for each share class.
The Board took into account the Fund’s investment performance and expense information provided to it among the factors considered in deciding to re-approve the Advisory Agreements.
Investment management and sub-advisory fee rates
The Board reviewed and considered the contractual fee rates payable by the Fund to Funds Management under the Management Agreement, as well as the contractual fee rates payable by the Fund to Funds Management for class-level administrative services under a Class-Level Administration Agreement, which include, among other things, class-level transfer agency and sub-transfer agency costs (collectively, the “Management Rates”). The Board also reviewed and considered the contractual investment sub-advisory fee rates that are payable by Funds Management to the Sub-Adviser for investment sub-advisory services.
Among other information reviewed by the Board was a comparison of the Fund’s Management Rates with the average contractual investment management fee rates of funds in the expense Groups at a common asset level as well as transfer agency costs of the funds in the expense Groups. The Board noted that the Management Rates of the Fund were higher than the sum of these average rates for the Fund’s expense Groups for all share classes. However, the Board also noted that the net operating expense ratios of the Fund were either in range of or equal to the median net operating expense ratios of the expense Groups for each share class, and that the Fund was benefitting from advisory fee breakpoints through the master portfolios in which it invests.

Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund  |  37


Board considerations (unaudited)
The Board also received and considered information about the portion of the total management fee that was retained by Funds Management after payment of the fee to the Sub-Adviser for sub-advisory services. In assessing the reasonableness of this amount, the Board received and evaluated information about the nature and extent of responsibilities retained and risks assumed by Funds Management and not delegated to or assumed by the Sub-Adviser, and about Funds Management’s on-going oversight services. Given the affiliation between Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser, the Board ascribed limited relevance to the allocation of fees between them.
The Board also received and considered information about the nature and extent of services offered and fee rates charged by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser to other types of clients with investment strategies similar to those of the Fund. In this regard, the Board received information about the significantly greater scope of services, and compliance, reporting and other legal burdens and risks of managing proprietary mutual funds compared with those associated with managing assets of other types of clients, including third-party sub-advised fund clients and non-mutual fund clients such as institutional separate accounts.
Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Board determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the Management Agreement and to the Sub-Adviser under the Sub-Advisory Agreement was reasonable.
Profitability
The Board received and considered information concerning the profitability of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo & Co. (“Wells Fargo”) from providing services to the fund family as a whole. The Board noted that the Sub-Adviser’s profitability information with respect to providing services to the Fund and other funds in the family was subsumed in the WFAM and Wells Fargo profitability analysis.
Funds Management reported on the methodologies and estimates used in calculating profitability, including a description of the methodology used to allocate certain expenses. Among other things, the Board noted that the levels of profitability reported on a fund-by-fund basis varied widely, depending on factors such as the size, type and age of fund.
Based on its review, the Board did not deem the profits reported by Funds Management, WFAM or Wells Fargo from services provided to the Fund to be at a level that would prevent it from approving the continuation of the Advisory Agreements.
Economies of scale
The Board received and considered information about the potential for Funds Management to experience economies of scale in the provision of management services to the Fund, the difficulties of calculating economies of scale at an individual fund level, and the extent to which potential scale benefits are shared with Fund shareholders. The Board noted the existence of breakpoints in the Fund’s management fee structure, which operate generally to reduce the Fund’s expense ratios as the Fund grows in size, and the size of the Fund in relation to such breakpoints. The Board considered that in addition to management fee breakpoints, Funds Management shares potential economies of scale from its management business in a variety of ways, including through fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangements, competitive management fee rates set at the outset without regard to breakpoints, and investments in the business intended to enhance services available to shareholders.
The Board concluded that Funds Management’s arrangements with respect to the Fund, including contractual breakpoints, constituted a reasonable approach to sharing potential economies of scale with the Fund and its shareholders.
Other benefits to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser
The Board received and considered information regarding potential “fall-out” or ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including the Sub-Adviser, as a result of their relationships with the Fund. Ancillary benefits could include, among others, benefits directly attributable to other relationships with the Fund and benefits potentially derived from an increase in Funds Management’s and the Sub-Adviser’s business as a result of their relationships with the Fund. The Board noted that various affiliates of Funds Management may receive distribution-related fees, shareholder servicing payments and sub-transfer agency fees in respect of shares sold or held through them and services provided.
The Board also reviewed information about soft dollar credits earned and utilized by the Sub-Adviser, fees earned by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser from managing a private investment vehicle for the fund family’s securities lending collateral, and commissions earned by an affiliated broker from portfolio transactions.
Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Board did not find that any ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including the Sub-Adviser, were unreasonable.

38  |  Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
Conclusion
At the Meeting, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser under each of the Advisory Agreements was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Advisory Agreements for a one-year term.

Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund  |  39


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board Considerations – New Agreements
Overview of the Board evaluation process
At a meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Board Meeting”), the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Wells Fargo Funds Trust (the “Trust”, and the series identified below, the “Funds”) approved the continuation of each Fund’s current Investment Management Agreement (the “Current Investment Management Agreement”) and the current Wells Cap Sub-Advisory Agreement (the “Current Wells Cap Sub-Advisory Agreement”, and collectively, the “Current Agreements”).
Wells Fargo Absolute Return Fund
Wells Fargo Core Plus Bond Fund
Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund
Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund
Wells Fargo Specialized Technology Fund
Wells Fargo Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund
Wells Fargo Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund
Wells Fargo Spectrum Growth Fund
Wells Fargo Spectrum Income Allocation Fund
Wells Fargo Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund
Each Trustee on the Board is not an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”)) of the Funds (collectively, the “Independent Trustees”). The process followed by the Board in considering and approving the continuation of the Current Agreements is referred to herein as the “2021 Annual Approval Process.”
As noted above, the closing of the sale of Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”) to a holding company (“NewCo”) affiliated with private funds of GTCR LLC (“GTCR”) and of Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. (“Reverence Capital”, and such transaction, the “Transaction”) will result in a change of control of Wells Fargo Funds Management LLC (“Funds Management”) and Wells Capital Management Incorporated (“Wells Capital”, and together with Funds Management, the “Advisers”), which will be considered to be an “assignment” of each Fund’s Current Agreements under the 1940 Act that will result in the automatic termination of each Fund’s Current Agreements. In light of the expected termination of each Fund’s Current Agreements upon the closing, at the Board Meeting the Board also considered and approved: (i) (i) a new Investment Management Agreement (the “New Investment Management Agreement”) between the Trust, on behalf of each Fund, and Funds Management; (ii) a new Sub-Advisory Agreement (the “New Wells Capital Sub-Advisory Agreement”) among the Trust, Funds Management and Wells Capital with respect to Core Plus Bond Fund, Growth Balanced Fund, Moderate Balanced Fund, Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund, Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund, Spectrum Growth Fund, Spectrum Income Allocation Fund, and Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund; and (iii) a new Sub-Advisory Agreement (the “New AllianzGI U.S. Sub-Advisory Agreement”, and collectively, the “New Agreements”) among the Trust, Funds Management and Allianz Global Investors U.S., LLC (“AllianzGI U.S.”, and together with Wells Capital, the “Sub-Advisers”) with respect to the Specialized Technology Fund, each of which is intended to go into effect upon the closing. The process followed by the Board in reviewing and approving the New Agreements is referred to herein as the “New Agreement Approval Process.”
At a series of meetings held in April and May 2021 (collectively, “April and May 2021 Meetings”) and at the Board Meeting, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital about the New Agreements and related matters. The Board reviewed and discussed information furnished by Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital that the Board considered reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the New Agreements and the services to be provided. At these meetings, senior representatives from Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital made presentations to, and responded to questions from, the Board.
In providing information to the Board in connection with the 2021 annual approval process for the Current Agreements (the “2021 Annual Approval Process”) and the New Agreement Approval Process, Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital (as applicable) were guided by requests for information submitted by independent legal counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. In considering and approving the New Agreements, the Trustees considered the information they believed relevant, including but not limited to the information discussed herein. The Board considered not only the specific information presented in connection with the April and May 2021 Meetings as well as the Board Meeting, but also the knowledge gained over time through interaction with Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers about various topics. In this regard, the Board reviews reports of Funds Management at each of its regular Board meetings, which includes, among other things, portfolio reviews and investment

40  |  Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
performance reports. In addition, the Board confers with portfolio managers at various times throughout the year. The Board was assisted in its evaluation of the New Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom the Independent Trustees received separate legal advice and with whom the Independent Trustees met separately. The Board did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each individual Trustee may have attributed different weights to various factors.
Among other information considered by the Board in connection with the Transaction was:
■  Information regarding the Transaction: information about the structure, financing sources and material terms and conditions of the Transaction, including the expected impact on the businesses conducted by the Advisers and by Wells Fargo Funds Distributor LLC, as the distributor of Fund shares.
■  Information regarding NewCo, GTCR and Reverence Capital: (i) information about NewCo, including information about its expected financial condition and access to capital, and senior leadership team; (ii) the experience of senior management at GTCR and Reverence Capital in acquiring portfolio companies; (iii) the plan to operationalize NewCo, including the transition of necessary infrastructure services through a transition services agreement with Wells Fargo under which Wells Fargo will continue to provide NewCo with certain services for a specified period of time after the closing; and (iv) information regarding regulatory matters, compliance, and risk management functions at NewCo, including resources to be dedicated thereto.
■  Impact of the Transaction on WFAM and Service Providers: (i) information regarding any changes to personnel and/or other resources of the Advisers as a result of the Transaction, including assurances regarding comparable and competitive compensation arrangements to attract and retain highly qualified personnel; and (ii) information about the organizational and operating structure with respect to NewCo, the Advisers and the Funds.
■  Impact of the Transaction on the Funds and their Shareholders: (i) information regarding anticipated benefits to the Funds as a result of the Transaction; (ii) a commitment that the Funds would not bear any expenses, directly or indirectly, in connection with the Transaction; (iii) confirmation that the Advisers intend to continue to manage the Funds in a manner consistent with each Fund’s current investment objectives and principal investments strategies; and (iv) a commitment that neither NewCo nor WFAM will take any steps that would impose any “unfair burden” (as that term is used in section 15(f)(1)(B) of the 1940 Act) on the Funds as a result of the Transaction.
With respect to the New Agreements, the Board considered: (i) a representation that, after the closing, all of the Funds will continue to be managed and advised by their current Advisers, and, for Specialized Technology Fund only, AllianzGI U.S., and that the same portfolio managers of the Sub-Advisers are expected to continue to manage the Funds after the Transaction; (ii) information regarding the terms of the New Agreements, including changes as compared to the Current Agreements; (iii) information confirming that the fee rates payable under the New Agreements will not increase as a result of the Transaction as compared to the rates under the Current Agreements; and (iv) assurances that the Transaction is not expected to cause any diminution with respect to the nature, extent and quality of any of the services currently provided to the Funds by the Advisers and, for Specialized Technology Fund only, AllianzGI U.S., as a result of the Transaction.
In addition to considering information furnished specifically to evaluate the impact of the Transaction on the Funds and their respective shareholders in connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board considered information furnished at prior meetings of the Board and its committees, including detailed information provided in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process. In this regard, in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board received information about complex-wide and individual Fund performance, fees and expenses, including: (i) a report from an independent data provider comparing the investment performance of each Fund to the investment performance of comparable funds and benchmark indices, over various time periods; (ii) a report from an independent data provider comparing each Fund’s total expense ratio (and its components) to those of comparable funds; (iii) comparative information concerning the fees charged and services provided by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to each Fund in managing other accounts (which may include other mutual funds, collective investment funds and institutional accounts), if any, that employ investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing such Fund(s); and (iv) profitability analyses of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo from providing services to the fund family as a whole.
After its deliberations, the Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the New Agreements is reasonable, approved the New Agreements for a two-year term, and voted to recommend that Fund shareholders approve the New Agreements. The Board considered the approval of the New Agreements as part of its consideration of agreements for funds across the complex, but its approvals were made on a fund-by-fund basis. The following summarizes a number of important, but not necessarily all, factors considered by the Board in support of its approvals.

Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund  |  41


Board considerations (unaudited)
Nature, extent and quality of services
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board received and considered various information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the Advisory Agreements. This information included a description of the investment advisory services and Fund-level administrative services covered by the Current Management Agreement, as well as, among other things, a summary of the background and experience of senior management of WFAM, of which Funds Management and Wells Capital are a part, and a summary of investments made in the business of WFAM. The Board also received a description of Funds Management’s and the Sub-Advisers’ business continuity plans, including a summary of the performance of such plans and any changes thereto during the COVID-19 pandemic, and of their approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity. The Board also received and reviewed information about Funds Management’s role as administrator of the Funds’ liquidity risk management program, Funds Management’s approach to risk management, and Funds Management’s intermediary and vendor oversight program.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board also considered the qualifications, background, tenure and responsibilities of each of the portfolio managers primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the Funds. The Board evaluated the ability of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to attract and retain qualified investment professionals, including research, advisory and supervisory personnel.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board further considered the compliance programs and compliance records of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers. In addition, the Board took into account the full range of services provided to the Fund by Funds Management and its affiliates.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board considered, among other information, the structure of the Transaction and expected impact, if any, of the Transaction on the operations, facilities, organization and personnel of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers. The Board received assurances from Funds Management that each Fund will continue to be advised by its current Sub-Adviser after the closing, and that the same individual portfolio managers are expected to continue to manage the Funds after the closing. With respect to the recruitment and retention of key personnel, the Board noted information from GTCR, Reverence Capital and the Advisers regarding the potential benefits for employees of joining NewCo. The Board recognized that the personnel who had been extended offers may not accept such offers and personnel changes may occur in the future in the ordinary course.
In addition, the Board considered information regarding the infrastructure, operational capabilities and support staff in place to assist in the portfolio management and operations of the Funds, including the provision of administrative services, and the anticipated impact of the Transaction on such matters. The Board also considered the business-related and other risks to which the Advisers may be subject in managing the Funds and in connection with the Transaction. The Board also considered the transition and integration plans as a result of the change in ownership of the Advisers from Wells Fargo to NewCo. The Board considered the resources and infrastructure that NewCo intends to devote to its compliance program to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations, as well as its risk management program and cybersecurity program. The Board also took into account assurances received from the Advisers, GTCR and Reverence Capital that the Transaction is not expected to cause any diminution in the nature, extent and quality of services provided by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to the Funds and their shareholders.
Fund investment performance and expenses
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board considered the investment performance results for each Fund over various time periods ended December 31, 2020. The Board considered these results in comparison to the investment performance of funds in a universe that was determined by Broadridge Inc. (“Broadridge”) to be similar to each Fund (the “Universe”), and in comparison to each Fund’s benchmark index and to other comparative data. Broadridge is an independent provider of investment company data. The Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the performance Universe. Where applicable, the Board received information concerning, and discussed factors contributing to, underperformance of Funds relative to the Universe and benchmark for any underperformance periods.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board also received and considered information regarding each Fund’s net operating expense ratios and their various components, including actual management fees, custodian and other non-management fees, and Rule 12b-1 and non-Rule 12b-1 shareholder service fees. The Board considered these ratios in comparison to the median ratios of funds in class-specific expense groups that were determined by Broadridge to be similar to the Fund (the “Groups”). The Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the expense Groups and an explanation of how funds comprising expense groups and their expense ratios may vary from year-to-year.

42  |  Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board received a commitment that WFAM will maintain fee and expense commitments for at least two years after the closing. The Board took into account each Fund’s investment performance and expense information among the factors considered in deciding to approve the New Agreements.
Investment management and sub-advisory fee rates
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board reviewed and considered the contractual fee rates payable by each Fund to Funds Management under the Current Management Agreement, as well as the contractual fee rates payable by each Fund to Funds Management for class-level administrative services under a Class-Level Administration Agreement, which include, among other things, class-level transfer agency and sub-transfer agency costs (collectively, the “Management Rates”). The Board also reviewed and considered the contractual investment sub-advisory fee rates that are payable by Funds Management to each of the Sub-Advisers under the Current Sub-Advisory Agreements for investment sub-advisory services (the “Sub-Advisory Fee Rates”).
Among other information reviewed by the Board in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, was a comparison of each Fund’s Management Rates with the average contractual investment management fee rates of funds in the expense Groups at a common asset level as well as transfer agency costs of the funds in the expense Groups.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board also received and considered information about the portion of the total management fee that was retained by Funds Management after payment of the Sub-Advisory Fee Rates. In assessing the reasonableness of this amount, the Board received and evaluated information about the nature and extent of responsibilities retained and risks assumed by Funds Management and not delegated to or assumed by the Sub-Advisers, and about Funds Management’s on-going oversight services. With respect to AllianzGI U.S., the Board also considered this amount in comparison to the median amount retained by advisers to funds in a sub-advised expense universe that was determined by Broadridge to be similar to the Specialized Technology Fund. In this regard, the Board noted the small size of the sub-advised expense universe. The Board also considered that the sub-advisory fees paid to AllianzGI U.S. had been negotiated by Funds Management on an arm’s length basis. Given the affiliation between Funds Management and Wells Capital, the Board ascribed limited relevance to the allocation of fees between them.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board also received and considered information about the nature and extent of services offered and fee rates charged by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to other types of clients, if any, with investment strategies similar to those of each Fund. In this regard, the Board received information about the significantly greater scope of services, and compliance, reporting and other legal burdens and risks of managing proprietary mutual funds compared with those associated with managing assets of other types of clients, including third-party sub-advised fund clients and non-mutual fund clients such as institutional separate accounts.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board noted the assurances received by it that there would be no increases to any of the Management Rates or the Sub-Advisory Fee Rates as a result of the Transaction. The Board also considered that the New Agreements do not change the computation method for calculating such fees, and there is no present intention to reduce expense waiver and reimbursement arrangements that are currently in effect. Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Board determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the New Management Agreement and to each of the Sub-Advisers under the New Sub-Advisory Agreements was reasonable.
Profitability
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board received and considered information concerning the profitability of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo from providing services to the fund family as a whole. The Board noted that Wells Capital’s profitability information with respect to providing services to each Fund Wells Capital sub-advises and other funds in the family was subsumed in the WFAM and Wells Fargo profitability analysis. The Board did not consider profitability with respect to AllianzGI U.S., as the sub-advisory fees paid to AllianzGI U.S. had been negotiated by Funds Management on an arm’s-length basis.
Funds Management reported on the methodologies and estimates used in calculating profitability in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, including a description of the methodology used to allocate certain expenses. Among other things, the Board noted that the levels of profitability reported on a fund-by-fund basis varied widely, depending on factors such as the size, type and age of fund.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board received certain information about NewCo’s projected financial condition, and reviewed with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital the underlying assumptions on which such information was based. The Board considered that NewCo is a newly formed entity, with no historical

Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund  |  43


Board considerations (unaudited)
operations, revenues or expenses, and that it is difficult to predict with any degree of certainty the future profitability of NewCo and the Advisers from advisory activities under the New Agreements. The Board considered that the fee rates payable under the New Agreements will not increase as a result of the Transaction as compared to the rates under the Current Agreements, and that the current contractual expense limitations applicable to each Fund will not increase. The Board noted that if the New Agreements are approved by shareholders and the Transaction closes, the Board will have the opportunity in the future to review the profitability of NewCo and the Advisers from advisory activities under the New Agreements.
Economies of scale
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board received and considered information about the potential for Funds Management to experience economies of scale in the provision of management services to the Funds, the difficulties of calculating economies of scale at an individual fund level, and the extent to which potential scale benefits are shared with Fund shareholders. The Board noted the existence of breakpoints in each Fund’s management fee structure, which operate generally to reduce the Fund’s expense ratios as the Fund grows in size, and the size of the Fund in relation to such breakpoints. The Board considered that, in addition to management fee breakpoints, Funds Management shares potential economies of scale from its management business in a variety of ways, including through fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangements, competitive management fee rates set at the outset without regard to breakpoints, and investments in the business intended to enhance services available to shareholders.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board noted that NewCo and the Advisers may benefit from possible growth of the Funds resulting from enhanced distribution capabilities. However, the Board noted that other factors could also affect the potential for economies of scale, and that it was not possible to quantify any potential future economies of scale. Based upon the information furnished to the Board in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process and the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board concluded that Funds Management’s arrangements with respect to each Fund, including contractual breakpoints and expense limitation arrangements, constituted a reasonable approach to sharing potential economies of scale with the Fund and its shareholders.
“Fall-out” benefits to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board received and considered information regarding potential “fall-out” or ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including Wells Capital, and AllianzGI U.S. as a result of their relationships with the Funds. Ancillary benefits could include, among others, benefits directly attributable to other relationships with the Funds and benefits potentially derived from an increase in Funds Management’s and the Sub-Advisers’ business as a result of their relationships with the Funds. The Board noted that various current affiliates of Funds Management may receive distribution-related fees, shareholder servicing payments and sub-transfer agency fees in respect of shares sold or held through them and services provided.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board also reviewed information about soft dollar credits earned and utilized by the Sub-Advisers, fees earned by Funds Management and Wells Capital from managing a private investment vehicle for the fund family’s securities lending collateral, and commissions earned by an affiliated broker of Wells Fargo from portfolio transactions.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board received information to the effect that the Transaction is not expected to have a material impact on the fall-out benefits currently realized by Funds Management and its affiliates, including Wells Capital, and AllianzGI U.S. The information reviewed by the Board also noted that several of the ancillary benefits identified for WFAM would be potential ancillary benefits for NewCo, including that the scale and reputation of the Funds might benefit NewCo’s broader reputation, product initiatives, technology investment and talent acquisition. Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Board did not find that any ancillary benefits expected to be received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including NewCo and Wells Capital, and AllianzGI U.S. under the New Agreements were unreasonable.
Conclusion
At the Board Meeting, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and to each of the Sub-Advisers under the New Agreements is reasonable, approved the New Agreements for a two-year term, and voted to recommend that Fund shareholders approve the New Agreements.

44  |  Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board Considerations - Interim Agreements
At a meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Board Meeting”), the Boards of Trustees (each, a “Board”, and collectively, the “Boards”) of Wells Fargo Funds Trust, Wells Fargo Master Trust, Wells Fargo Variable Trust, Wells Fargo Global Dividend Opportunity Fund, Wells Fargo Income Opportunities Fund, Wells Fargo Multi-Sector Income Fund and Wells Fargo Utilities and High Income Fund (each a “Trust”, and the series thereof, a “Fund”) reviewed and approved for the Trusts and Funds, as applicable: (i) interim investment management agreements (the “Interim Management Agreements”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”); (ii) interim investment advisory agreements (the “Interim Advisory Agreements”) with Funds Management; and (iii) interim sub-advisory agreements (the “Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements”) with each of Cooke & Bieler, L.P., Galliard Capital Management LLC (“Galliard”), Peregrine Capital Management Inc., Wells Capital Management LLC (“WellsCap”), and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited (“WFAMI”, and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”). Each Trustee on the Board is not an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) of the Funds (collectively, the “Independent Trustees”). The Interim Management Agreements, Interim Advisory Agreements, and Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements are collectively referred to as the “Interim Advisory Agreements.”
At the Board Meeting, the Boards reviewed and approved the continuation of existing investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements (the “Current Advisory Agreements”) for each Trust and Fund, as applicable. The factors considered and conclusions reached by the Boards in approving the Current Advisory Agreements are summarized in the section entitled “Board Considerations – Current Agreements” of this shareholder report. The Boards noted that Wells Fargo & Company has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”), which includes Funds Management, Galliard, WellsCap and WFAMI (the “Affiliated Sub-Advisers”), to a holding company affiliated with private funds of GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. (the “Transaction”). The Boards further noted that the Transaction would result in a change-of-control of Funds Management and the Affiliated Sub-Advisers, which would be considered to be an “assignment” under the 1940 Act that would terminate the Current Advisory Agreements. At the Board Meeting, the Boards also reviewed and approved new investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements (the “New Advisory Agreements”) for each Trust and Fund, as applicable, that would replace the Current Advisory Agreements upon consummation of the Transaction, subject to approval of the New Advisory Agreements by the applicable Trust’s or Fund’s shareholders. The factors considered and conclusions reached by the Boards in approving the New Advisory Agreements are summarized in the section entitled “Board Considerations – New Agreements” of this shareholder report.
At the Board Meeting, the Boards also approved the Interim Advisory Agreements, which will go into effect for a Trust or Fund only in the event that shareholders of such Trust or Fund do not approve the New Advisory Agreement(s) for the Trust or Fund by the closing date of the Transaction, when the Current Advisory Agreements will terminate. The Board noted that, in such a circumstance, the Interim Advisory Agreements will permit continuity of management by allowing Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to continue providing services to the Trust or Fund pursuant to the Interim Advisory Agreements while the Trust or Fund continues to solicit shareholder approval of such New Advisory Agreement(s). The Boards noted that the terms of the Interim Advisory Agreements are identical to those of the Current Advisory Agreements, except for the term and the addition of escrow provisions with respect to the advisory fees. The Boards also noted that the entities that would service the Funds and Trusts under the Interim Advisory Agreements are identical to those that provide services under the Current Advisory Agreements and those that will provide services under the New Advisory Agreements.
In approving the Interim Advisory Agreements, the Boards considered the same factors and reached the same conclusions as they considered and reached with respect to the Boards’ approvals of the Current Advisory Agreements and New Advisory Agreements, as applicable, which are described in separate Board Consideration sections within this shareholder report. Prior to the Board Meeting, including at a series of meetings held in April and May 2021, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. about the Interim Advisory Agreements and related matters. The Independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Interim Advisory Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately.
At the Board Meeting, after considering the factors and reaching the conclusions described in the separate Board Consideration sections within this shareholder report, the Boards unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and to each Sub-Adviser under each of the Interim Advisory Agreements was reasonable, and approved the Interim Advisory Agreements.

Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund  |  45


For more information
More information about Wells Fargo Funds is available free upon request. To obtain literature, please write, visit the Fund's website, or call:
Wells Fargo Funds
P.O. Box 219967
Kansas City, MO 64121-9967
Website: wfam.com
Individual investors: 1-800-222-8222
Retail investment professionals: 1-888-877-9275
Institutional investment professionals: 1-866-765-0778
This report and the financial statements contained herein are submitted for the general information of the shareholders of the Fund. If this report is used for promotional purposes, distribution of the report must be accompanied or preceded by a current prospectus. Before investing, please consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of the investment. For a current prospectus and, if available, a summary prospectus, containing this information, call 1-800-222-8222 or visit the Fund's website at wfam.com. Read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) is the trade name for certain investment advisory/management firms owned by Wells Fargo & Company. These firms include but are not limited to Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC. Certain products managed by WFAM entities are distributed by Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC (a broker-dealer and Member FINRA).
This material is for general informational and educational purposes only and is NOT intended to provide investment advice or a recommendation of any kind - including a recommendation for any specific investment, strategy, or plan.
 INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED  ■  NO BANK GUARANTEE  ■  MAY LOSE VALUE 
© 2021 Wells Fargo & Company. All rights reserved.
PAR-0621-00756 07-21
A279/AR279 05-21


Annual Report
May 31, 2021
Wells Fargo
C&B Large Cap Value Fund




Contents

2

6

10
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund  

11
Financial statements  

12

13

14

15

20

25
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio  

26
Financial statements  

30

31

32

33

34

39

40
Board considerations  

45

49

55
 
Reduce clutter.
Save trees.
Sign up for electronic delivery of prospectuses and shareholder reports at wellsfargo.com/ advantagedelivery
The views expressed and any forward-looking statements are as of May 31, 2021, unless otherwise noted, and are those of the Fund's portfolio managers and/or Wells Fargo Asset Management. Discussions of individual securities or the markets generally are not intended as individual recommendations. Future events or results may vary significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. The views expressed are subject to change at any time in response to changing circumstances in the market. Wells Fargo Asset Management and the Fund disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any views expressed or forward-looking statements.
 INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED  ■  NO BANK GUARANTEE  ■  MAY LOSE VALUE 

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund  |  1


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
Andrew Owen
President
Wells Fargo Funds
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to offer you this annual report for the Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021. Despite the initial challenges presented by the spread of COVID-19 cases and the business restrictions implemented throughout much of the world, global stocks showed robust returns, supported by global stimulus programs, a rapid vaccination rollout, and recovering consumer and corporate sentiment. Bond markets mostly produced positive returns, as investors searched for yield and diversification during difficult market stretches.
For the 12-month period, equities had robust returns, as policymakers continued to fight the effects of COVID-19. Emerging market stocks led both non-U.S. developed market equities and U.S. stocks. Gains by fixed-income securities were varied, though mostly positive. For the period, U.S. stocks, based on the S&P 500 Index,1 gained 40.32%. International stocks, as measured by the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net),2 returned 42.78%, while the MSCI EM Index (Net),3 had stronger performance, with a 51.00% gain. Among bond indexes, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index,4 returned -0.40%, the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (unhedged),5 gained 7.84%, the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index,6 returned 4.74%, and the ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index,7 returned 15.18%.
The COVID-19 lockdown began over a year ago.
By June, economies started to reopen and global central banks committed to do all they could to provide economic support through liquidity and low borrowing costs. U.S. economic activity was aided by one-time $1,200 stimulus checks and $600 weekly bonus unemployment benefits that lasted through July. However, unemployment remained historically high and COVID-19 cases began to increase by late June. China’s economic recovery began to pick up momentum.
July was broadly positive for equities and fixed income. However, economic data and a resurgence of COVID-19 cases underscored the urgent need to regain control of the pandemic. Second-quarter gross domestic product (GDP) shrank from the previous quarter by 9.5% and 12.1% in the U.S. and the eurozone, respectively. In contrast, China’s second-quarter GDP grew 3.2% year over year. The U.S. economy added 1.8 million jobs in July, but a double-digit jobless rate persisted.

1 The S&P 500 Index consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. It is a market-value-weighted index with each stock's weight in the index proportionate to its market value. You cannot invest directly in an index.
2 The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) All Country World Index (ACWI) ex USA Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed and emerging markets, excluding the United States. Source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI. You cannot invest directly in an index.
3 The MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure equity market performance of emerging markets. You cannot invest directly in an index.
4 The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based benchmark that measures the investment-grade, U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage pass-throughs), asset-backed securities, and commercial mortgage-backed securities. You cannot invest directly in an index.
5 The Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (unhedged) is an unmanaged index that provides a broad-based measure of the global investment-grade fixed-income markets excluding the U.S. dollar-denominated debt market. You cannot invest directly in an index.
6 The Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index composed of long-term tax-exempt bonds with a minimum credit rating of Baa. You cannot invest directly in an index.
7 The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index of domestic and Yankee high-yield bonds. The index tracks the performance of high-yield securities traded in the U.S. bond market. You cannot invest directly in an index. Copyright 2021. ICE Data Indices, LLC. All rights reserved.

2  |  Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
The stock market continued to rally in August despite concerns over rising numbers of U.S. and European COVID-19 cases as well as the July expiration of the $600 weekly bonus unemployment benefit. Relatively strong second-quarter earnings boosted investor sentiment along with the U.S. Federal Reserve Board’s (Fed’s) announcement of a monetary policy shift expected to support longer-term low interest rates. U.S. manufacturing and services activity indexes beat expectations while the U.S. housing market maintained strength. In Europe, retail sales expanded and consumer confidence was steady. China’s economy continued to expand.
Stocks grew more volatile in September on mixed economic data. U.S. economic activity continued to grow. However, U.S. unemployment remained elevated at 7.9% in September. With the U.S. Congress delaying further fiscal relief and uncertainties surrounding a possible vaccine, doubts crept back into the financial markets. In the U.K., a lack of progress in Brexit talks weighed on markets. China’s economy picked up steam, fueled by increased global demand.
In October, capital markets stepped back from their six-month rally. Market volatility rose in advance of the U.S. election and amid a global increase in COVID-19 infections. Europe introduced tighter restrictions affecting economic activity. U.S. markets looked favorably at the prospect of Democratic control of the federal purse strings, which could lead to additional fiscal stimulus and a boost to economic activity. Meanwhile, China reported 4.9% third-quarter GDP growth.
Global stocks rallied in November, propelled by optimism over three promising COVID-19 vaccines. Reversing recent trends, value stocks outperformed growth stocks and cyclical stocks outpaced information technology (IT) stocks. However, U.S. unemployment remained elevated, with a net job loss of 10 million since February. The eurozone services Purchasing Managers' Index, a monthly survey of purchasing managers, contracted sharply while the region’s manufacturing activity grew. The U.S. election results added to the upbeat mood as investors anticipated more consistent policies in the new administration.
Financial markets ended the year with strength on high expectations for a rapid rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines, the successful passage of a $900 billion stimulus package, and rising expectations of additional economic support from a Democratic-led Congress. U.S. economic data were mixed with still-elevated unemployment and weak retail sales but growth in manufacturing output. In contrast, China’s economic expansion continued in both manufacturing and nonmanufacturing. U.S. COVID-19 infection rates continued to rise even as new state and local lockdown measures were implemented.
The calendar year 2021 began with emerging market stocks leading all major asset classes in January, driven by China’s strong economic growth and a broad recovery in corporate earnings, which propelled China’s stock market higher. In the U.S., positive news on vaccine trials and January expansion in both the manufacturing and services sectors was offset by a weak December monthly jobs report. This was compounded by technical factors as some hedge funds were forced to sell stocks to protect themselves against a well-publicized short squeeze coordinated by a group of retail investors. Eurozone sentiment and economic growth were particularly weak, reflecting the impact of a new lockdown with stricter social distancing along with a slow vaccine rollout.
February saw major domestic equity indexes driven higher on the hope of a new stimulus bill, improving COVID-19 vaccination numbers, and the gradual reopening of the economy. Most S&P 500 companies reported better-than-expected earnings, with positive surprises coming from the financials, IT, health care, and materials sectors. Japan saw its economy strengthen as a result of strong export numbers. Meanwhile, crude oil prices continued their climb, rising more than 25% for the year. Domestic government bonds experienced a sharp sell-off in late February as markets priced in a more robust economic recovery and higher future growth and inflation expectations.
Global stocks rallied in November, propelled by optimism over three promising COVID-19 vaccines.

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund  |  3


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
The passage of the massive domestic stimulus bill highlighted March activity, leading to increased forecasts for U.S. growth in 2021.
The passage of the massive domestic stimulus bill highlighted March activity, leading to increased forecasts for U.S. growth in 2021. Domestic employment surged as COVID-19 vaccinations and an increasingly open economy spurred hiring. A majority of U.S. small companies reported they were operating at pre-pandemic capacity or higher. Value stocks continued its outperformance of growth stocks in the month, continuing the trend that started in late 2020. Meanwhile, most major developed global equity indexes were up month to date on the back of rising optimism regarding the outlook for global growth. While the U.S. and U.K. have been the most successful in terms of the vaccine rollout, even in markets where the vaccine has lagged, such as in the eurozone and Japan, equity indexes in many of those countries have also been in positive territory this year.
Equity markets produced another strong showing in April. Domestically, the continued reopening of the economy had a strong impact on positive equity performance, as people started leaving their households and jobless claims continued to fall. Domestic corporate bonds performed well and the U.S. dollar weakened. Meanwhile, the U.S. government continued to seek to invest in the recovery, this time by outlining a package of over $2 billion to improve infrastructure. The primary headwind in April was inflation, as investors tried to determine the breadth and longevity of recent price increases. Developed Europe has been supported by a meaningful increase in the pace of vaccinations. Unfortunately many emerging market countries have not been as successful. India in particular has seen COVID-19 cases surge, serving as an example of the need to get vaccinations rolled out to less developed nations.
Vaccine rollouts continued in May, leading to loosened restrictions globally. As a result, equity markets in general saw a minor increase in returns. Concerns that the continued economic rebound could result in inflation increases becoming more than transitory were supported by the higher input costs businesses are experiencing. Meanwhile, those inflation concerns were tempered by the Fed, which stayed steady on its view of the economy and eased fears of a sudden and substantial policy change. Positive performance in the emerging market equity space was supported this month by steady consumer demand and strong commodity prices. Fixed-income markets were also slightly positive for the month, driven by inflation uncertainty and a softer U.S. dollar.
Don’t let short-term uncertainty derail long-term investment goals.
Periods of investment uncertainty can present challenges, but experience has taught us that maintaining long-term investment goals can be an effective way to plan for the future. Although diversification cannot guarantee an investment profit or prevent losses, we believe it can be an effective way to manage investment risk and potentially smooth out overall portfolio performance. We encourage investors to know their investments and to understand that appropriate levels of risk-taking may unlock opportunities.
Thank you for choosing to invest with Wells Fargo Funds. We appreciate your confidence in us and remain committed to helping you meet your financial needs.
Sincerely,
Andrew Owen
President
Wells Fargo Funds

For further information about your Fund, contact your investment professional, visit our website at wfam.com, or call us directly at 1-800-222-8222.

4  |  Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund


This page is intentionally left blank.


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Investment objective The Fund seeks maximum long-term total return (current income and capital appreciation), consistent with minimizing risk to principal.
Manager Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC
Subadviser for the affiliated master portfolio*
Cooke & Bieler, L.P.
Portfolio managers Andrew B. Armstrong, CFA®, Wesley Lim, CFA®, Steve Lyons, CFA®, Michael M. Meyer, CFA®, Edward W. O'Connor, CFA®, R. James O'Neil, CFA®, Mehul Trivedi, CFA®, William Weber, CFA®
    
Average annual total returns (%) as of May 31, 2021
    Including sales charge   Excluding sales charge   Expense ratios1 (%)
  Inception date 1 year 5 year 10 year   1 year 5 year 10 year   Gross Net 2
Class A (CBEAX) 7-26-2004 47.97 12.74 11.08   56.98 14.09 11.74   1.28 1.08
Class C (CBECX) 7-26-2004 54.94 13.24 10.91   55.94 13.24 10.91   2.03 1.83
Class R6 (CBEJX)3 10-31-2016   57.75 14.58 12.16   0.85 0.65
Administrator Class (CBLLX) 7-26-2004   57.12 14.20 11.92   1.20 1.00
Institutional Class (CBLSX) 7-26-2004   57.58 14.48 12.18   0.95 0.75
Russell 1000® Value Index4   44.38 12.33 11.51  
Figures quoted represent past performance, which is no guarantee of future results, and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder may pay on an investment in a fund. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance shown without sales charges would be lower if sales charges were reflected. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted, which assumes the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. Current month-end performance is available on the Fund’s website, wfam.com.
Please keep in mind that high double-digit returns were primarily achieved during favorable market conditions. You should not expect that such favorable returns can be consistently achieved. A fund’s performance, especially for short time periods, should not be the sole factor in making your investment decision.
Index returns do not include transaction costs associated with buying and selling securities, any mutual fund fees or expenses, or any taxes. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
For Class A shares, the maximum front-end sales charge is 5.75%. For Class C shares, the maximum contingent deferred sales charge is 1.00%. Performance including a contingent deferred sales charge assumes the sales charge for the corresponding time period. Class R6, Administrator Class, and Institutional Class shares are sold without a front-end sales charge or contingent deferred sales charge.
1 Reflects the expense ratios as stated in the most recent prospectuses, which include the impact of 0.01% in acquired fund fees and expenses. The expense ratios shown are subject to change and may differ from the annualized expense ratios shown in the financial highlights of this report, which do not include acquired fund fees and expenses.
2 The manager has contractually committed through September 30, 2021, to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers at 1.08% for Class A, 1.83% for Class C, 0.65% for Class R6, 1.00% for Administrator Class, and 0.75% for Institutional Class. Brokerage commissions, stamp duty fees, interest, taxes, acquired fund fees and expenses (if any) from funds in which the affiliated master portfolio invests, and extraordinary expenses are excluded from the expense caps. Net expenses from the affiliated master portfolio are included in the expense caps. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. Without these caps, the Fund’s returns would have been lower. The expense ratio paid by an investor is the net expense ratio (the total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers) as stated in the prospectuses.
3 Historical performance shown for the Class R6 shares prior to their inception reflects the performance of the Institutional Class shares, and includes the higher expenses applicable to the Institutional Class shares. If these expenses had been included, returns for the Class R6 shares would be higher.
4 The Russell 1000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 companies with lower price/book ratios and lower forecasted growth values. You cannot invest directly in an index.
Stock values fluctuate in response to the activities of individual companies and general market and economic conditions. Consult the Fund’s prospectus for additional information on these and other risks.

* The Fund is a feeder fund in a master-feeder structure that invests substantially all of its assets in a single affiliated master portfolio of the Wells Fargo Master Trust with a substantially identical investment objective and substantially similar investment strategies. References to the investment activities of the Fund are intended to refer to the investment activities of the affiliated master portfolio in which it invests.
CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.

6  |  Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Growth of $10,000 investment as of May 31, 20211
1 The chart compares the performance of Class A shares for the most recent ten years with the Russell 1000® Value Index. The chart assumes a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in Class A shares and reflects all operating expenses and assumes the maximum initial sales charge of 5.75%.

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund  |  7


Performance highlights (unaudited)
MANAGER'S DISCUSSION
Fund highlights
The Fund outperformed its benchmark, the Russell 1000® Value Index, for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021.
Stock selection in consumer discretionary, information technology, and health care, as well as an overweight position in financials were key contributors to relative performance.
Stock selection in financials and communication services, as well as an underweight in materials detracted from relative performance.
Portfolio overview and updates
U.S. equity markets have recovered strongly from the steepest decline on record last spring. Starting in the second quarter of 2020, investors began to price in a global reopening, which only accelerated as vaccines began to be rolled out. Late in the year, value stocks led the charge, showing strong signs of life. However, its resuscitation was not enough to offset the substantial lead growth built during the height of pandemic-related economic shutdowns. U.S. equity markets continued to surge during the beginning of 2021. Intensifying economic momentum, another enormous dose of fiscal stimulus, accommodative monetary policy, and expanding vaccine availability further fueled the market’s appetite for risk. The resurgence of value stocks that began late last year also intensified, with value stocks beating growth stocks by the widest margin since the first quarter of 2001.
Ten largest holdings (%) as of May 31, 20211
Arrow Electronics Incorporated 3.63
Brookfield Asset Management Incorporated Class A 3.38
AerCap Holdings NV 3.19
Leidos Holdings Incorporated 3.08
State Street Corporation 2.91
US Bancorp 2.78
Arch Capital Group Limited 2.78
Johnson & Johnson 2.75
Fidelity National Financial Incorporated 2.69
The Charles Schwab Corporation 2.63
1 Each holding represents the Fund’s allocable portion of the affiliated master portfolio security. Figures represent each holding as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets. Holdings are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
Stock initiations occurred across multiple sectors and included The Allstate Corporation; Atmos Energy Corporation; General Mills, Incorporated; IAA Incorporated; Ingredion Incorporated; Stanley Black & Decker, Incorporated; and Unilever PLC. Making room for these holdings, we also eliminated positions across multiple sectors, including Hexcel Corporation, Johnson Controls International plc, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Axalta Coating Systems Limited, Snap-on Incorporated, and Eaton Corporation plc.
Contributors
Both stock selection and sector allocation were broadly additive to performance over the period. From an allocation perspective, 9 out of 11 sectors contributed to relative results. The overweight to financials and industrials and the underweight to utilities benefited the Fund the most. Top-performing stocks included Synchrony Financial, Gildan Activewear Incorporated, and The Charles Schwab Corporation. Synchrony benefited from continued good credit results and government stimulus payments. Gildan has seen a recovery in demand for its imprintable garments off 2020 lows. Although many of its end markets remain depressed, new sources of retail channel demand have emerged that could expand the company’s total addressable market over time. Charles Schwab reported good progress on the integration of its TD Ameritrade, Incorporated, acquisition with little evidence of customer churn or other operational issues. The company is also poised to benefit from any increase in interest rates.
Detractors
From an allocation perspective, the underweight to materials and consumer discretionary detracted slightly from the Fund. Only two stocks had negative performance and a negative contribution to results—IAA, Incorporated, and Becton, Dickinson and Company. IAA, an owner and operator of a leading auction marketplace for the sale of total-loss, damaged, and low-value vehicles, underperformed as
 

8  |  Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Sector allocation as of May 31, 20211
1 Figures represent the sector allocation of the affiliated master portfolio as a percentage of the long-term investments of the affiliated master portfolio. These amounts are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
investors drove the stock’s valuation down, potentially due to concerns over the sustainability of recent elevated average selling prices, worry about short-term disruption related to winter storms in Texas, or disappointment that management did not provide guidance due to COVID-19-related uncertainty. Becton Dickinson, a developer, manufacturer, and seller of a broad portfolio of medical supplies, devices, and diagnostics, lagged recently due to investor concerns that a significant decline in demand for the company’s COVID-19 rapid antigen test would cause a sharp drop in overall revenues.
Outlook
Markets are clearly forecasting a strong recovery fueled by pent-up consumer demand and ongoing fiscal and monetary stimulus. However, with indexes well above pre-pandemic levels, even a strong recovery may not be enough to sustain further gains. Although investors are prone to forget it in moments of enthusiasm, valuations matter, and large parts of the market seem expensive even relative to optimistic assumptions.
 

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund  |  9


Fund expenses (unaudited)
As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and contingent deferred sales charges (if any) on redemptions and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) and/or shareholder servicing fees, and other Fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period from December 1, 2020 to May 31, 2021.
Actual expenses
The “Actual” line of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the “Actual” line under the heading entitled “Expenses paid during period” for your applicable class of shares to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes
The “Hypothetical” line of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) and contingent deferred sales charges. Therefore, the “Hypothetical” line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
  Beginning
account value
12-1-2020
Ending
account value
5-31-2021
Expenses
paid during
the period1,2
Annualized net
expense ratio2
Class A        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,261.34 $ 6.03 1.07%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,019.60 $ 5.39 1.07%
Class C        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,257.29 $10.30 1.83%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,015.81 $ 9.20 1.83%
Class R6        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,264.00 $ 3.67 0.65%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,021.69 $ 3.28 0.65%
Administrator Class        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,262.04 $ 5.58 0.99%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,020.00 $ 4.99 0.99%
Institutional Class        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,263.50 $ 4.23 0.75%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,021.19 $ 3.78 0.75%
1 Expenses paid is equal to the annualized net expense ratio of each class multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one-half-year period).
2 Amounts reflect net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio in which the Fund invests.

10  |  Wells Fargo C& B Large Cap Value Fund


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

          Value
Investment companies:  99.93%          
Affiliated master portfolio:  99.93%          
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio         $316,451,986
Total Investment companies (Cost $203,999,902)         316,451,986
Total investments in securities (Cost $203,999,902) 99.93%       316,451,986
Other assets and liabilities, net 0.07           210,336
Total net assets 100.00%       $316,662,322
Transactions with the affiliated Master Portfolio were as follows:
  % of
ownership,
beginning
of period
% of
ownership,
end of
period
Net realized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Dividends
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Affiliated
income
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Value,
end of
period
% of
net
assets
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio 74.98% 76.92% $25,510,777 $89,716,793 $4,625,966 $4,821 $316,451,986 99.93%
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund  |  11


Statement of assets and liabilities—May 31, 2021
   
Assets  
Investments in affiliated Master Portfolio, at value (cost $203,999,902)

$ 316,451,986
Receivable for Fund shares sold

987,420
Receivable from manager

11,479
Total assets

317,450,885
Liabilities  
Payable for Fund shares redeemed

668,181
Administration fees payable

37,745
Distribution fee payable

2,949
Accrued expenses and other liabilities

79,688
Total liabilities

788,563
Total net assets

$316,662,322
Net assets consist of  
Paid-in capital

$ 186,225,688
Total distributable earnings

130,436,634
Total net assets

$316,662,322
Computation of net asset value and offering price per share  
Net assets – Class A

$ 102,332,229
Shares outstanding – Class A1

5,961,813
Net asset value per share – Class A

$17.16
Maximum offering price per share – Class A2

$18.21
Net assets – Class C

$ 4,718,979
Shares outstanding – Class C1

278,123
Net asset value per share – Class C

$16.97
Net assets – Class R6

$ 47,300,613
Shares outstanding – Class R61

2,743,292
Net asset value per share – Class R6

$17.24
Net assets – Administrator Class

$ 5,980,029
Shares outstanding – Administrator Class1

347,592
Net asset value per share – Administrator Class

$17.20
Net assets – Institutional Class

$ 156,330,472
Shares outstanding – Institutional Class1

9,067,223
Net asset value per share – Institutional Class

$17.24
1 The Fund has an unlimited number of authorized shares.
2 Maximum offering price is computed as 100/94.25 of net asset value. On investments of $50,000 or more, the offering price is reduced.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

12  |  Wells Fargo C& B Large Cap Value Fund


Statement of operations—year ended May 31, 2021
   
Investment income  
Dividends allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio (net of foreign withholding taxes of $97,616)

$ 4,625,966
Affiliated income allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

4,821
Expenses allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

(1,760,936)
Waivers allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

110,822
Total investment income

2,980,673
Expenses  
Management fee

128,974
Administration fees  
Class A

174,406
Class C

8,056
Class R6

12,257
Administrator Class

7,877
Institutional Class

161,386
Shareholder servicing fees  
Class A

207,493
Class C

9,579
Administrator Class

15,131
Distribution fee  
Class C

28,737
Custody and accounting fees

12,006
Professional fees

35,337
Registration fees

110,527
Shareholder report expenses

49,529
Trustees’ fees and expenses

21,080
Other fees and expenses

15,218
Total expenses

997,593
Less: Fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements  
Fund-level

(418,340)
Class A

(8,305)
Class R6

(4,086)
Administrator Class

(1,212)
Net expenses

565,650
Net investment income

2,415,023
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments  
Net realized gains on securities transactions allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

25,510,777
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on securities transactions allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

89,716,793
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

115,227,570
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

$117,642,593
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund  |  13


Statement of changes in net assets
         
  Year ended
May 31, 2021
Year ended
May 31, 2020
Operations        
Net investment income

  $ 2,415,023   $ 3,041,679
Net realized gains on investments

  25,510,777   14,162,746
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

  89,716,793   (23,968,868)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations

  117,642,593   (6,764,443)
Distributions to shareholders from        
Net investment income and net realized gains        
Class A

  (4,170,269)   (7,751,447)
Class C

  (154,865)   (388,806)
Class R6

  (2,183,532)   (5,218,989)
Administrator Class

  (299,002)   (711,108)
Institutional Class

  (6,446,162)   (11,583,308)
Total distributions to shareholders

  (13,253,830)   (25,653,658)
Capital share transactions Shares   Shares  
Proceeds from shares sold        
Class A

610,000 8,963,843 738,336 9,862,221
Class C

68,098 996,267 84,359 1,159,805
Class R6

281,375 4,009,424 862,015 10,181,197
Administrator Class

19,784 279,674 86,612 1,194,613
Institutional Class

3,644,970 49,931,868 3,591,723 48,556,144
    64,181,076   70,953,980
Reinvestment of distributions        
Class A

291,093 4,115,619 529,924 7,655,000
Class C

11,107 154,614 26,971 383,791
Class R6

24,172 343,838 47,617 691,796
Administrator Class

13,379 189,677 34,562 500,228
Institutional Class

451,083 6,414,372 792,083 11,497,247
    11,218,120   20,728,062
Payment for shares redeemed        
Class A

(1,092,566) (14,863,709) (1,199,143) (15,487,514)
Class C

(115,785) (1,529,367) (192,765) (2,559,135)
Class R6

(844,970) (11,496,464) (2,860,401) (39,194,686)
Administrator Class

(221,462) (3,119,176) (297,032) (3,913,331)
Institutional Class

(3,426,687) (47,236,282) (4,306,577) (53,511,682)
    (78,244,998)   (114,666,348)
Net decrease in net assets resulting from capital share transactions

  (2,845,802)   (22,984,306)
Total increase (decrease) in net assets

  101,542,961   (55,402,407)
Net assets        
Beginning of period

  215,119,361   270,521,768
End of period

  $316,662,322   $ 215,119,361
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

14  |  Wells Fargo C& B Large Cap Value Fund


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class A 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$11.49 $13.01 $13.91 $14.54 $12.55
Net investment income

0.10 0.12 0.11 0.09 1 0.08
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

6.29 (0.33) 0.02 0.87 2.23
Total from investment operations

6.39 (0.21) 0.13 0.96 2.31
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.11) (0.13) (0.12) (0.06) (0.08)
Net realized gains

(0.61) (1.18) (0.91) (1.53) (0.24)
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.72) (1.31) (1.03) (1.59) (0.32)
Net asset value, end of period

$17.16 $11.49 $13.01 $13.91 $14.54
Total return2

56.98% (3.61)% 1.33% 6.29% 18.62%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

1.24% 1.27% 1.23% 1.21% 1.24%
Net expenses

1.07% 1.07% 1.08% 1.10% 1.15%
Net investment income

0.73% 0.92% 0.83% 0.58% 0.62%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate3

38% 33% 47% 42% 89%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$102,332 $70,680 $79,172 $85,707 $83,016
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.64%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.64%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.65%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.66%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.68%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges.
3 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund  |  15


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class C 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$11.36 $12.87 $13.75 $14.44 $12.48
Net investment income (loss)

(0.03) 0.02 1 0.01 1 (0.02) 1 (0.02)
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

6.25 (0.35) 0.03 0.86 2.22
Total from investment operations

6.22 (0.33) 0.04 0.84 2.20
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

0.00 0.00 (0.01) 0.00 0.00
Net realized gains

(0.61) (1.18) (0.91) (1.53) (0.24)
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.61) (1.18) (0.92) (1.53) (0.24)
Net asset value, end of period

$16.97 $11.36 $12.87 $13.75 $14.44
Total return2

55.94% (4.41)% 0.61% 5.46% 17.73%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

1.99% 2.02% 1.97% 1.96% 1.99%
Net expenses

1.83% 1.83% 1.83% 1.85% 1.90%
Net investment income (loss)

(0.04)% 0.16% 0.07% (0.16)% (0.13)%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate3

38% 33% 47% 42% 89%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$4,719 $3,576 $5,098 $11,031 $8,043
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.64%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.64%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.65%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.66%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.68%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges.
3 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

16  |  Wells Fargo C& B Large Cap Value Fund


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class R6 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 1
Net asset value, beginning of period

$11.53 $13.06 $13.97 $14.59 $12.73
Net investment income

0.16 2 0.18 2 0.18 2 0.18 2 0.16
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

6.32 (0.33) 0.00 3 0.85 2.06
Total from investment operations

6.48 (0.15) 0.18 1.03 2.22
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.16) (0.20) (0.18) (0.12) (0.12)
Net realized gains

(0.61) (1.18) (0.91) (1.53) (0.24)
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.77) (1.38) (1.09) (1.65) (0.36)
Net asset value, end of period

$17.24 $11.53 $13.06 $13.97 $14.59
Total return4

57.75% (3.25)% 1.74% 6.76% 17.65%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

0.82% 0.84% 0.79% 0.77% 0.81%
Net expenses

0.65% 0.65% 0.65% 0.65% 0.70%
Net investment income

1.14% 1.33% 1.27% 1.28% 1.04%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate5

38% 33% 47% 42% 89%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$47,301 $37,859 $68,366 $110,665 $3,532
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.64%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.64%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.65%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.65%
Year ended May 31, 20171 0.68%
    
1 For the period from October 31, 2016 (commencement of class operations) to May 31, 2017
2 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
3 Amount is less than $0.005.
4 Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.
5 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund  |  17


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Administrator Class 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$11.51 $13.03 $13.92 $14.56 $12.54
Net investment income

0.11 1 0.13 1 0.12 1 0.10 1 0.10 1
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

6.30 (0.33) 0.02 0.87 2.24
Total from investment operations

6.41 (0.20) 0.14 0.97 2.34
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.11) (0.14) (0.12) (0.08) (0.08)
Net realized gains

(0.61) (1.18) (0.91) (1.53) (0.24)
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.72) (1.32) (1.03) (1.61) (0.32)
Net asset value, end of period

$17.20 $11.51 $13.03 $13.92 $14.56
Total return

57.12% (3.56)% 1.44% 6.36% 18.82%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

1.17% 1.19% 1.15% 1.13% 1.16%
Net expenses

0.99% 0.99% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00%
Net investment income

0.81% 1.00% 0.90% 0.69% 0.77%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate2

38% 33% 47% 42% 89%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$5,980 $6,167 $9,274 $12,742 $11,467
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.64%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.64%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.65%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.66%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.68%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

18  |  Wells Fargo C& B Large Cap Value Fund


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Institutional Class 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$11.53 $13.05 $13.96 $14.58 $12.58
Net investment income

0.15 0.16 0.14 0.13 1 0.14
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

6.32 (0.33) 0.02 0.89 2.22
Total from investment operations

6.47 (0.17) 0.16 1.02 2.36
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.15) (0.17) (0.16) (0.11) (0.12)
Net realized gains

(0.61) (1.18) (0.91) (1.53) (0.24)
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.76) (1.35) (1.07) (1.64) (0.36)
Net asset value, end of period

$17.24 $11.53 $13.05 $13.96 $14.58
Total return

57.58% (3.33)% 1.64% 6.68% 19.05%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

0.91% 0.94% 0.90% 0.88% 0.91%
Net expenses

0.75% 0.75% 0.75% 0.77% 0.80%
Net investment income

1.05% 1.25% 1.17% 0.87% 0.96%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate2

38% 33% 47% 42% 89%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$156,330 $96,838 $108,613 $135,082 $220,257
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.64%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.64%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.65%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.66%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.68%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund  |  19


Notes to financial statements
1. ORGANIZATION
Wells Fargo Funds Trust (the "Trust"), a Delaware statutory trust organized on March 10, 1999, is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). As an investment company, the Trust follows the accounting and reporting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, Financial Services – Investment Companies. These financial statements report on the Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund (the "Fund") which is a diversified series of the Trust.
The Fund is a feeder fund in a master-feeder structure that invests substantially all of its assets in a single master portfolio with a substantially identical investment objective and substantially similar investment strategies. The Fund invests in Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio, a separate diversified portfolio (the “affiliated Master Portfolio”) of Wells Fargo Master Trust, a registered open-end management investment company. As of May 31, 2021, the Fund owned 76.92% of Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio. The affiliated Master Portfolio directly acquires portfolio securities and the Fund acquires an indirect interest in those securities. The Fund accounts for its investment in the affiliated Master Portfolio as a partnership investment and records on a daily basis its share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s income, expense and realized and unrealized gains and losses. The financial statements of the affiliated Master Portfolio for the year ended May 31, 2021 are included in this report and should be read in conjunction with the Fund’s financial statements.
On February 23, 2021, Wells Fargo & Company announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management ("WFAM") to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. WFAM is the trade name used by the asset management businesses of Wells Fargo & Company and includes Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the investment manager to the Fund, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, both registered investment advisers providing sub-advisory services to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Fund's principal underwriter. As part of the transaction, Wells Fargo & Company will own a 9.9% equity interest and will continue to serve as an important client and distribution partner.
Consummation of the transaction will result in the automatic termination of the Fund's investment management agreement and subadvisory agreement. The Fund's Board of Trustees approved a new investment management and new subadvisory agreement and approved submitting the agreements to the Fund’s shareholders for approval at a special meeting of shareholders expected to be held on August 16, 2021. Shareholders of record of the Fund at the close of business on May 28, 2021 are entitled to vote at the meeting. If shareholders approve the new agreements, they would take effect upon the closing of the transaction. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
This shareholder report is not asking you for a proxy. A separate proxy statement with more detailed information about the transaction will be provided to Fund shareholders and should be reviewed carefully.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following significant accounting policies, which are consistently followed in the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund, are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Securities valuation
All investments are valued each business day as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4 p.m. Eastern Time), although the Fund may deviate from this calculation time under unusual or unexpected circumstances.
Investments in the affiliated Master Portfolio are valued daily based on the Fund’s proportionate share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s net assets, which are also valued daily. Securities held in the affiliated Master Portfolio are valued as discussed in the Notes to Financial Statements of the affiliated Master Portfolio, which are included elsewhere in this report.
Investments which are not valued using any of the methods discussed above are valued at their fair value, as determined in good faith by the Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees has established a Valuation Committee comprised of the Trustees and has delegated to it the authority to take any actions regarding the valuation of portfolio securities that the Valuation Committee deems necessary or appropriate, including determining the fair value of portfolio securities, unless the determination has been delegated to the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee at Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC ("Funds Management"). The Board of Trustees retains the authority to make or ratify any valuation decisions or approve any changes to the Valuation Procedures as it deems appropriate. On a quarterly basis, the Board of Trustees

20  |  Wells Fargo C& B Large Cap Value Fund


Notes to financial statements
receives reports on any valuation actions taken by the Valuation Committee or the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee which may include items for ratification.
Investment transactions, income and expenses
Investments in the affiliated Master Portfolio are recorded on a trade date basis. The Fund records daily its proportionate share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s income, expenses and realized and unrealized gains or losses. The Fund also accrues its own expenses.
Distributions to shareholders
Distributions to shareholders from net investment income and any net realized gains are recorded on the ex-dividend date and paid at least annually. Such distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations and may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Dividend sources are estimated at the time of declaration. The tax character of distributions is determined as of the Fund's fiscal year end. Therefore, a portion of the Fund's distributions made prior to the Fund’s fiscal year end may be categorized as a tax return of capital at year end.
Federal and other taxes
The Fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by distributing substantially all of its investment company taxable income and any net realized capital gains (after reduction for capital loss carryforwards) sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes. Accordingly, no provision for federal income taxes was required.
The Fund’s income and federal excise tax returns and all financial records supporting those returns for the prior three fiscal years are subject to examination by the federal and Delaware revenue authorities. Management has analyzed the Fund's tax positions taken on federal, state, and foreign tax returns for all open tax years and does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability.
As of May 31, 2021, the aggregate cost of all investments for federal income tax purposes was $206,181,382 and the unrealized gains (losses) consisted of:
Gross unrealized gains $112,452,084
Gross unrealized losses (2,181,480)
Net unrealized gains $110,270,604
Class allocations
The separate classes of shares offered by the Fund differ principally in applicable sales charges, distribution, shareholder servicing, and administration fees. Class specific expenses are charged directly to that share class. Investment income, common fund-level expenses, and realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative proportion of net assets of each class.
3. FAIR VALUATION MEASUREMENTS
At May 31, 2021, the Fund’s investment in an affiliated Master Portfolio was measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient. The investment objective and fair value of the affiliated Master Portfolio is as follows:
Affiliated Master Portfolio Investment objective Fair value of affiliated
Master Portfolio
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio Seeks maximum long-term total return (current income and capital appreciation), consistent with minimizing risk to principal $316,451,986
The affiliated Master Portfolio does not have a redemption period notice, can be redeemed daily and does not have any unfunded commitments.
4. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
Management fee
Funds Management, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company ("Wells Fargo"), is the manager of the Fund and provides advisory and fund-level administrative services under an investment management agreement. Under the

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund  |  21


Notes to financial statements
investment management agreement, Funds Management is responsible for, among other services, implementing the investment objectives and strategies of the Fund and providing fund-level administrative services in connection with the Fund’s operations. As long as the Fund continues to invest substantially all of its assets in a single affiliated Master Portfolio, the Fund pays Funds Management an investment management fee only for fund-level administrative services at the following annual rate based on the Fund’s average daily net assets:
Average daily net assets Management fee
First $5 billion 0.050%
Next $5 billion 0.040
Over $10 billion 0.030
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the management fee was equivalent to an annual rate of 0.05% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
Funds Management also serves as the adviser to the affiliated Master Portfolio and is entitled to receive a fee from the affiliated Master Portfolio for those services.
Administration fees
Under a class-level administration agreement, Funds Management provides class-level administrative services to the Fund, which includes paying fees and expenses for services provided by the transfer agent, sub-transfer agents, omnibus account servicers and record-keepers. As compensation for its services under the class-level administration agreement, Funds Management receives an annual fee which is calculated based on the average daily net assets of each class as follows:
  Class-level
administration fee
Class A 0.21%
Class C 0.21
Class R6 0.03
Administrator Class 0.13
Institutional Class 0.13
Waivers and/or expense reimbursements
Funds Management has contractually waived and/or reimbursed management and administration fees to the extent necessary to maintain certain net operating expense ratios for the Fund. When each class of the Fund has exceeded its expense cap, Funds Management has waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses from fund-level expenses on a proportionate basis and then from class specific expenses. When only certain classes exceed their expense caps, waivers and/or reimbursements are applied against class specific expenses before fund-level expenses. Net expenses from the affiliated Master Portfolio are included in the expense caps. Funds Management has committed through September 30, 2021 to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap expenses. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. The contractual expense caps are as follows:
  Expense ratio caps
Class A 1.08%
Class C 1.83
Class R6 0.65
Administrator Class 1.00
Institutional Class 0.75

22  |  Wells Fargo C& B Large Cap Value Fund


Notes to financial statements
Distribution fee
The Trust has adopted a distribution plan for Class C shares of the Fund pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. A distribution fee is charged to Class C shares and paid to Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC ("Funds Distributor"), the principal underwriter, at an annual rate of 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class C shares.
In addition, Funds Distributor is entitled to receive the front-end sales charge from the purchase of Class A shares and a contingent deferred sales charge on the redemption of certain Class A shares. Funds Distributor is also entitled to receive the contingent deferred sales charges from redemptions of Class C shares. Funds Distributor received $4,161 in contingent deferred sales charges from Class A shares for the year ended May 31, 2021. No front-end sales charges were incurred by Class A shares and no contingent deferred sales charges were incurred by Class C shares for the year ended May 31, 2021.
Shareholder servicing fees
The Trust has entered into contracts with one or more shareholder servicing agents, whereby Class A, Class C, and Administrator Class of the Fund are charged a fee at an annual rate of 0.25% of the average daily net assets of each respective class. A portion of these total shareholder servicing fees were paid to affiliates of Wells Fargo.
5. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS
The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing substantially all of its assets in a single affiliated Master Portfolio. Purchases and sales have been calculated by multiplying the Fund's ownership percentage of the affiliated Master Portfolio by the affiliated Master Portfolio's purchases and sales. Purchases and sales of investments, excluding U.S. government obligations (if any) and short-term securities, for the year ended May 31, 2021 were $92,506,033 and $121,749,291, respectively.
6. BANK BORROWINGS
The Trust (excluding the money market funds), Wells Fargo Master Trust and Wells Fargo Variable Trust are parties to a $350,000,000 revolving credit agreement whereby the Fund is permitted to use bank borrowings for temporary or emergency purposes, such as to fund shareholder redemption requests. Interest under the credit agreement is charged to the Fund based on a borrowing rate equal to the higher of the Federal Funds rate in effect on that day plus 1.25% or the overnight LIBOR rate in effect on that day plus 1.25%. In addition, an annual commitment fee equal to 0.25% of the unused balance is allocated to each participating fund.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, there were no borrowings by the Fund under the agreement.
7. DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS
The tax character of distributions paid during the years ended May 31, 2021 and May 31, 2020 were as follows:
  Year ended May 31
  2021 2020
Ordinary income $4,722,816 $ 6,869,198
Long-term capital gain 8,531,014 18,784,460
As of May 31, 2021, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Undistributed
ordinary
income
Undistributed
long-term
gain
Unrealized
gains
$1,961,939 $18,204,091 $110,270,604
8. CONCENTRATION RISKS
Concentration risks result from exposure to a limited number of sectors. Through its investment in the affiliated Master Portfolio which may invest a substantial portion of its assets in any sector, the Fund may in turn be more affected by changes in that sector than a fund whose investments are not heavily weighted in any sector. As of the end of the period, the affiliated Master Portfolio concentrated its portfolio in investments related to the financials sector.

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund  |  23


Notes to financial statements
9. INDEMNIFICATION
Under the Fund's organizational documents, the officers and Trustees have been granted certain indemnification rights against certain liabilities that may arise out of performance of their duties to the Fund. The Fund has entered into a separate agreement with each Trustee that converts indemnification rights currently existing under the Fund’s organizational documents into contractual rights that cannot be changed in the future without the consent of the Trustee. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with service providers that contain a variety of indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent on future claims that may be made against the Fund and, therefore, cannot be estimated.
10. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
In August 2018, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 updates the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Management has adopted this guidance which did not have a material impact on the financial statements.
11. CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization announced that it had made the assessment that coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) is a pandemic. The impacts of COVID-19 are affecting the entire global economy, individual companies and investment products, the funds, and the market in general. There is significant uncertainty around the extent and duration of business disruptions related to COVID-19 and the impacts may last for an extended period of time. COVID-19 has led to significant uncertainty and volatility in the financial markets.
12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
At a meeting held July 15, 2021, the Board of Trustees of the Wells Fargo Funds approved a change in the Fund's name to remove “Wells Fargo” from the Fund's name and replace with “Allspring”. The change is expected to go into effect on October 11, 2021.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) announced that it will be changing its company name to Allspring Global Investments upon the closing of the previously announced sale transaction of WFAM by Wells Fargo & Company to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. The new corporate name is expected to go into effect on the closing date of the transaction, which is anticipated to occur in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
Following the closing of the transaction, Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the Fund's investment manager, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, each sub-advisers to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Fund's principal underwriter, will each be rebranded as Allspring.

24  |  Wells Fargo C& B Large Cap Value Fund


Report of independent registered public accounting firm
To the Shareholders of the Fund and Board of Trustees
Wells Fargo Funds Trust:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund (the Fund), one of the funds constituting Wells Fargo Funds Trust, including the portfolio of investments, as of May 31, 2021, the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the financial statements) and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended. In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of May 31, 2021, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Fund in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and financial highlights, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. Such procedures also included confirmation of securities owned as of May 31, 2021, by correspondence with the transfer agent. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and financial highlights. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have not been able to determine the specific year that we began serving as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies; however, we are aware that we have served as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies since at least 1955.
Boston, Massachusetts
July 28, 2021

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund  |  25


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Common stocks:  95.09%          
Communication services:  7.11%          
Diversified telecommunication services: 2.54%           
Verizon Communications Incorporated          185,100 $ 10,456,299
Entertainment: 2.62%           
Activision Blizzard Incorporated          110,900  10,785,023
Media: 1.95%           
Omnicom Group Incorporated           97,300   8,001,952
Consumer discretionary:  5.56%          
Household durables: 1.90%           
Whirlpool Corporation           33,000   7,823,970
Textiles, apparel & luxury goods: 3.66%           
Gildan Activewear Incorporated          278,700  10,077,792
HanesBrands Incorporated          255,000   4,982,700
           15,060,492
Consumer staples:  7.16%          
Food products: 2.92%           
General Mills Incorporated          131,100   8,240,946
Ingredion Incorporated           39,470   3,746,887
           11,987,833
Personal products: 2.27%           
Unilever plc ADR          155,900   9,349,323
Tobacco: 1.97%           
Philip Morris International Incorporated           84,100   8,109,763
Energy:  0.98%          
Energy equipment & services: 0.98%           
Schlumberger Limited       129,100 4,044,703
Financials:  33.02%          
Banks: 5.81%           
JPMorgan Chase & Company       43,800 7,193,712
PNC Financial Services Group Incorporated       27,100 5,275,828
US Bancorp       188,200 11,438,796
          23,908,336
Capital markets: 10.28%           
Brookfield Asset Management Incorporated Class A       276,100 13,898,874
Intercontinental Exchange Incorporated       49,500 5,587,560
State Street Corporation       137,800 11,985,844
The Charles Schwab Corporation       146,500 10,819,025
          42,291,303
Consumer finance: 1.68%           
Synchrony Financial       145,800 6,912,378
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

26  |  Wells Fargo C& B Large Cap Value Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Diversified financial services: 2.42%           
Berkshire Hathaway Incorporated Class B           34,350 $  9,942,264
Insurance: 12.83%           
Alleghany Corporation           11,600   8,312,212
Arch Capital Group Limited          286,400  11,424,496
Chubb Limited           62,900  10,692,371
Fidelity National Financial Incorporated          236,000  11,089,640
Progressive Corporation           70,197   6,955,119
The Allstate Corporation           31,600   4,316,876
           52,790,714
Health care:  12.66%          
Health care equipment & supplies: 4.33%           
Becton Dickinson & Company           41,140   9,951,355
Medtronic plc           62,200   7,873,898
           17,825,253
Health care providers & services: 5.58%           
HCA Healthcare Incorporated           40,600   8,720,474
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings           22,000   6,038,560
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated           19,880   8,188,970
           22,948,004
Pharmaceuticals: 2.75%           
Johnson & Johnson           66,950  11,331,288
Industrials:  17.11%          
Air freight & logistics: 1.45%           
United Parcel Service Incorporated Class B       27,700 5,944,420
Commercial services & supplies: 2.22%           
IAA Incorporated       160,540 9,145,964
Electrical equipment: 1.38%           
AMETEK Incorporated       41,900 5,660,690
Industrial conglomerates: 1.18%           
3M Company       23,950 4,862,808
Machinery: 4.60%           
Colfax Corporation       218,800 9,670,960
Stanley Black & Decker Incorporated       17,960 3,893,728
Woodward Incorporated       42,250 5,373,355
          18,938,043
Professional services: 3.09%           
Leidos Holdings Incorporated       123,570 12,696,818
Trading companies & distributors: 3.19%           
AerCap Holdings NV       222,500 13,127,500
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio  |  27


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Information technology:  7.25%          
Electronic equipment, instruments & components: 5.34%           
Arrow Electronics Incorporated          124,300 $  14,957,019
TE Connectivity Limited           51,660   7,009,229
           21,966,248
IT services: 1.91%           
Amdocs Limited          100,700   7,864,670
Materials:  1.19%          
Metals & mining: 1.19%           
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Company           29,090   4,889,156
Real estate:  1.07%          
Real estate management & development: 1.07%           
CBRE Group Incorporated Class A           50,300   4,415,334
Utilities:  1.98%          
Gas utilities: 1.98%           
Atmos Energy Corporation           82,110   8,142,849
Total Common stocks (Cost $242,230,582)         391,223,398
    
    Yield      
Short-term investments:  4.88%          
Investment companies:  4.88%          
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class ♠∞   0.03%   20,061,602  20,061,602
Total Short-term investments (Cost $20,061,602)          20,061,602
Total investments in securities (Cost $262,292,184) 99.97%       411,285,000
Other assets and liabilities, net 0.03           113,870
Total net assets 100.00%       $411,398,870
    
Non-income-earning security
The issuer is an affiliate of the Portfolio as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The rate represents the 7-day annualized yield at period end.
    
Abbreviations:
ADR American depositary receipt
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

28  |  Wells Fargo C& B Large Cap Value Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

Investments in affiliates
An affiliated investment is an investment in which the Portfolio owns at least 5% of the outstanding voting shares of the issuer or as a result of other relationships, such as the Portfolio and the issuer having the same adviser or investment manager. Transactions with issuers that were either affiliates of the Portfolio at the beginning of the period or the end of the period were as follows:
  Value,
beginning of
period
Purchases Sales
proceeds
Net
realized
gains
(losses)
Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses)
Value,
end of
period
% of
net
assets
Shares,
end
of period
Income
from
affiliated
securities
Short-term investments                  
Investment companies                  
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class $6,370,055 $124,207,109 $(110,515,562) $0 $0 $20,061,602 4.88% 20,061,602 $6,330
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio  |  29


Statement of assets and liabilities—May 31, 2021
   
Assets  
Investments in unaffiliated securities, at value (cost $242,230,582)

$ 391,223,398
Investments in affiliated securites, at value (cost $20,061,602)

20,061,602
Receivable for dividends

467,407
Receivable for investments sold

387,510
Prepaid expenses and other assets

47,162
Total assets

412,187,079
Liabilities  
Payable for investments purchased

576,921
Advisory fee payable

211,288
Total liabilities

788,209
Total net assets

$411,398,870
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

30  |  Wells Fargo C& B Large Cap Value Portfolio


Statement of operations—year ended May 31, 2021
   
Investment income  
Dividends (net of foreign withholdings taxes of $127,991)

$ 6,054,864
Income from affiliated securities

6,330
Total investment income

6,061,194
Expenses  
Advisory fee

2,194,057
Custody and accounting fees

20,544
Professional fees

44,423
Interest holder report expenses

9,173
Trustees’ fees and expenses

19,199
Other fees and expenses

18,002
Total expenses

2,305,398
Less: Fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements

(145,096)
Net expenses

2,160,302
Net investment income

3,900,892
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments  
Net realized gains on investments

33,139,971
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

117,846,464
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

150,986,435
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

$154,887,327
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio  |  31


Statement of changes in net assets
     
  Year ended
May 31, 2021
Year ended
May 31, 2020
Operations    
Net investment income

$ 3,900,892 $ 4,668,688
Net realized gains on investments

33,139,971 14,608,307
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

117,846,464 (25,082,549)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations

154,887,327 (5,805,554)
Capital transactions    
Transactions in investors’ beneficial interests    
Contributions

49,283,346 41,745,884
Withdrawals

(79,684,157) (99,923,052)
Net decrease in net assets resulting from capital transactions

(30,400,811) (58,177,168)
Total increase (decrease) in net assets

124,486,516 (63,982,722)
Net assets    
Beginning of period

286,912,354 350,895,076
End of period

$411,398,870 $286,912,354
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

32  |  Wells Fargo C& B Large Cap Value Portfolio


Financial highlights
  Year ended May 31
  2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Total return

57.96% (3.40)% 1.80% 6.65% 19.17%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)          
Gross expenses

0.68% 0.68% 0.67% 0.67% 0.68%
Net expenses1

0.64% 0.64% 0.65% 0.66% 0.68%
Net investment income

1.16% 1.36% 1.27% 1.02% 1.09%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate

38% 33% 47% 42% 89%
    
1 Net expense ratios reflect voluntary waivers.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio  |  33


Notes to financial statements
1. ORGANIZATION
Wells Fargo Master Trust (the "Trust"), a Delaware statutory trust organized on March 10, 1999, is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). As an investment company, the Trust follows the accounting and reporting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, Financial Services – Investment Companies. These financial statements report on the Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio (the "Portfolio") which is a diversified series of the Trust.
Interests in the Portfolio are available solely through private placement transactions that do not involve any "public offering" within the meaning of Section 4(2) of the Investment Company Act of 1933.
On February 23, 2021, Wells Fargo & Company announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management ("WFAM") to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. WFAM is the trade name used by the asset management businesses of Wells Fargo & Company and includes Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the adviser to the Portfolio, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, both registered investment advisers providing sub-advisory services to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Portfolio's principal underwriter. As part of the transaction, Wells Fargo & Company will own a 9.9% equity interest and will continue to serve as an important client and distribution partner.
Consummation of the transaction will result in the automatic termination of the Portfolio's advisory agreement and subadvisory agreement. The Portfolio's Board of Trustees approved a new advisory and new subadvisory agreement and approved submitting the agreements to the Portfolio’s interest holders for approval at a special meeting of interest holders expected to be held on August 16, 2021. Interest holders of record of the Portfolio at the close of business on May 28, 2021 are entitled to vote at the meeting. If interest holders approve the new agreements, they would take effect upon the closing of the transaction. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following significant accounting policies, which are consistently followed in the preparation of the financial statements of the Portfolio, are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Securities valuation
All investments are valued each business day as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4 p.m. Eastern Time), although the Portfolio may deviate from this calculation time under unusual or unexpected circumstances.
Equity securities that are listed on a foreign or domestic exchange or market are valued at the official closing price or, if none, the last sales price. If no sale occurs on the principal exchange or market that day, a fair value price will be determined in accordance with the Portfolio’s Valuation Procedures.
Investments in registered open-end investment companies are valued at net asset value. Interests in non-registered investment companies that are redeemable at net asset value are fair valued normally at net asset value.
Investments which are not valued using any of the methods discussed above are valued at their fair value, as determined in good faith by the Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees has established a Valuation Committee comprised of the Trustees and has delegated to it the authority to take any actions regarding the valuation of portfolio securities that the Valuation Committee deems necessary or appropriate, including determining the fair value of portfolio securities, unless the determination has been delegated to the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee at Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC ("Funds Management"). The Board of Trustees retains the authority to make or ratify any valuation decisions or approve any changes to the Valuation Procedures as it deems appropriate. On a quarterly basis, the Board of Trustees receives reports on any valuation actions taken by the Valuation Committee or the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee which may include items for ratification.
Securities lending
The Portfolio may lend its securities from time to time in order to earn additional income in the form of fees or interest on securities received as collateral or the investment of any cash received as collateral. When securities are on loan, the Portfolio receives interest or dividends on those securities. Cash collateral received in connection with its securities lending transactions is invested in Securities Lending Cash Investments, LLC (the "Securities Lending Fund"). Investments in Securities Lending Fund

34  |  Wells Fargo C& B Large Cap Value Portfolio


Notes to financial statements
are valued at the evaluated bid price provided by an independent pricing service. Income earned from investment in the Securities Lending Fund (net of fees and rebates), if any, is included in income from affiliated securities on the Statement of Operations.
In a securities lending transaction, the net asset value of the Portfolio is affected by an increase or decrease in the value of the securities loaned and by an increase or decrease in the value of the instrument in which collateral is invested. The amount of securities lending activity undertaken by the Portfolio fluctuates from time to time. The Portfolio has the right under the lending agreement to recover the securities from the borrower on demand. In the event of default or bankruptcy by the borrower, the Portfolio may be prevented from recovering the loaned securities or gaining access to the collateral or may experience delays or costs in doing so. In such an event, the terms of the agreement allow the unaffiliated securities lending agent to use the collateral to purchase replacement securities on behalf of the Portfolio or pay the Portfolio the market value of the loaned securities. The Portfolio bears the risk of loss with respect to depreciation of its investment of the cash collateral.
Security transactions and income recognition
Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains or losses are recorded on the basis of identified cost.
Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date. Dividend income is recorded net of foreign taxes withheld where recovery of such taxes is not assured.
Federal and other taxes
The Portfolio is not required to pay federal income taxes on its net investment income and net capital gains as it is treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. All income, gains and losses of the Portfolio are deemed to have been “passed through” to the interest holders in proportion to their holdings of the Portfolio regardless of whether income and gains have been distributed by the Portfolio.
The Portfolio’s income tax returns and all financial records supporting those returns for the prior three fiscal years are subject to examination by the federal revenue authority. Management has analyzed the Portfolio’s tax positions taken on federal, state, and foreign tax returns for all open tax years and does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability.
As of May 31, 2021, the aggregate cost of all investments for federal income tax purposes was $267,019,371 and the unrealized gains (losses) consisted of:
Gross unrealized gains $149,220,053
Gross unrealized losses (4,954,424)
Net unrealized gains $144,265,629
3. FAIR VALUATION MEASUREMENTS
Fair value measurements of investments are determined within a framework that has established a fair value hierarchy based upon the various data inputs utilized in determining the value of the Portfolio’s investments. The three-level hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The Portfolio’s investments are classified within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The inputs are summarized into three broad levels as follows:
Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical securities
Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Portfolio’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs or methodologies used for valuing investments in securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio  |  35


Notes to financial statements
The following is a summary of the inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s assets and liabilities as of May 31, 2021:
  Quoted prices
(Level 1)
Other significant
observable inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
unobservable inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Assets        
Investments in:        
Common stocks        
Communication services $ 29,243,274 $0 $0 $ 29,243,274
Consumer discretionary 22,884,462 0 0 22,884,462
Consumer staples 29,446,919 0 0 29,446,919
Energy 4,044,703 0 0 4,044,703
Financials 135,844,995 0 0 135,844,995
Health care 52,104,545 0 0 52,104,545
Industrials 70,376,243 0 0 70,376,243
Information technology 29,830,918 0 0 29,830,918
Materials 4,889,156 0 0 4,889,156
Real estate 4,415,334 0 0 4,415,334
Utilities 8,142,849 0 0 8,142,849
Short-term investments        
Investment companies 20,061,602 0 0 20,061,602
Total assets $411,285,000 $0 $0 $411,285,000
Additional sector, industry or geographic detail, if any, is included in the Portfolio of Investments.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the Portfolio did not have any transfers into/out of Level 3.
4. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES AND OTHER EXPENSES
Advisory fee
The Trust has entered into an advisory contract with Funds Management, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company ("Wells Fargo"). The adviser is responsible for implementing investment policies and guidelines and for supervising the subadviser, who is responsible for day-to-day portfolio management of the Portfolio. Pursuant to the contract, Funds Management is entitled to receive an advisory fee at the following annual rate based on the Portfolio’s average daily net assets:
Average daily net assets Advisory fee
First $500 million 0.650%
Next $500 million 0.625
Next $1 billion 0.600
Next $2 billion 0.575
Next $4 billion 0.550
Next $4 billion 0.525
Next $4 billion 0.500
Over $16 billion 0.475
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the advisory fee was equivalent to an annual rate of 0.65% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets.
Funds Management has retained the services of a subadviser to provide daily portfolio management to the Portfolio. The fee for subadvisory services is borne by Funds Management. Cooke & Bieler, L.P., which is not an affiliate of the Funds Management, is the subadviser to the Portfolio and is entitled to receive a fee from Funds Management at an annual rate starting at 0.38% and declining to 0.30% as the average daily net assets of the Portfolio increase.

36  |  Wells Fargo C& B Large Cap Value Portfolio


Notes to financial statements
Funds Management has voluntarily waived and/or reimbursed advisory fees to reduce the net operating expense ratio of the Portfolio. These voluntary waivers may be discontinued at any time.
Interfund transactions
The Portfolio may purchase or sell portfolio investment securities to certain other Wells Fargo affiliates pursuant to Rule 17a-7 under the 1940 Act and under procedures adopted by the Board of Trustees. The procedures have been designed to ensure that these interfund transactions, which do not incur broker commissions, are effected at current market prices.
5. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS
Purchases and sales of investments, excluding U.S. government obligations (if any) and short-term securities, for the year ended May 31, 2021 were $120,137,705 and $158,115,962, respectively.
6. SECURITIES LENDING TRANSACTIONS
The Portfolio lends its securities through an unaffiliated securities lending agent and receives collateral in the form of cash or securities with a value at least equal to the value of the securities on loan. The value of the loaned securities is determined at the close of each business day and any increases or decreases in the required collateral are exchanged between the Portfolio and the counterparty on the next business day. Cash collateral received is invested in the Securities Lending Fund which seeks to provide a positive return compared to the daily Federal Funds Open Rate by investing in high-quality, U.S. dollar-denominated short-term money market instruments and is exempt from registration under Section 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act. Securities Lending Fund is managed by Funds Management and is subadvised by Wells Capital Management Incorporated ("WellsCap"), an affiliate of Funds Management and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo. Funds Management receives an advisory fee starting at 0.05% and declining to 0.01% as the average daily net assets of the Securities Lending Fund increase. All of the fees received by Funds Management are paid to WellsCap for its services as subadviser.
In the event of counterparty default or the failure of a borrower to return a loaned security, the Portfolio has the right to use the collateral to offset any losses incurred. As of May 31, 2021, the Portfolio did not have any securities on loan.
7. BANK BORROWINGS
The Trust, along with Wells Fargo Variable Trust and Wells Fargo Funds Trust (excluding the money market funds), are parties to a $350,000,000 revolving credit agreement whereby the Portfolio is permitted to use bank borrowings for temporary or emergency purposes, such as to fund interest holders withdrawal requests. Interest under the credit agreement is charged to the Portfolio based on a borrowing rate equal to the higher of the Federal Funds rate in effect on that day plus 1.25% or the overnight LIBOR rate in effect on that day plus 1.25%. In addition, an annual commitment fee equal to 0.25% of the unused balance is allocated to each participating fund.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, there were no borrowings by the Portfolio under the agreement.
8. CONCENTRATION RISKS
As of the end of the period, the Portfolio concentrated its portfolio of investments in the financials sector. A fund that invests a substantial portion of its assets in any sector may be more affected by changes in that sector than would be a fund whose investments are not heavily weighted in any sector.
9. INDEMNIFICATION
Under the Portfolio's organizational documents, the officers and Trustees have been granted certain indemnification rights against certain liabilities that may arise out of performance of their duties to the Portfolio. The Portfolio has entered into a separate agreement with each Trustee that converts indemnification rights currently existing under the Portfolio’s organizational documents into contractual rights that cannot be changed in the future without the consent of the Trustee. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Portfolio may enter into contracts with service providers that contain a variety of indemnification clauses. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent on future claims that may be made against the Portfolio and, therefore, cannot be estimated.
10. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
In August 2018, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 updates the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. The amendments are effective for fiscal years,

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio  |  37


Notes to financial statements
and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Management has adopted this guidance which did not have a material impact on the financial statements.
11. CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization announced that it had made the assessment that coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) is a pandemic. The impacts of COVID-19 are affecting the entire global economy, individual companies and investment products, the funds, and the market in general. There is significant uncertainty around the extent and duration of business disruptions related to COVID-19 and the impacts may last for an extended period of time. COVID-19 has led to significant uncertainty and volatility in the financial markets.
12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
At a meeting held July 15, 2021, the Board of Trustees of the Wells Fargo Funds approved a change in the Portfolio's name to remove “Wells Fargo” from the Portfolio's name and replace with “Allspring”. The change is expected to go into effect on October 11, 2021.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) announced that it will be changing its company name to Allspring Global Investments upon the closing of the previously announced sale transaction of WFAM by Wells Fargo & Company to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. The new corporate name is expected to go into effect on the closing date of the transaction, which is anticipated to occur in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
Following the closing of the transaction, Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the Portfolio's investment adviser, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, each sub-advisers to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC will each be rebranded as Allspring.

38  |  Wells Fargo C& B Large Cap Value Portfolio


To the Interest Holders of the Portfolio and Board of Trustees
Wells Fargo Master Trust:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio (the Portfolio), one of the portfolios constituting Wells Fargo Master Trust, including the portfolio of investments, as of May 31, 2021, the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the financial statements) and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Portfolio as of May 31, 2021, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Portfolio in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and financial highlights, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. Such procedures also included confirmation of securities owned as of May 31, 2021, by correspondence with the custodian, transfer agent and brokers, or by other appropriate auditing procedures. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and financial highlights. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have not been able to determine the specific year that we began serving as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies; however, we are aware that we have served as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies since at least 1955.
Boston, Massachusetts
July 28, 2021

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio  |  39


Other information (unaudited)
TAX INFORMATION
For corporate shareholders, pursuant to Section 854 of the Internal Revenue Code, 73% of ordinary income dividends qualify for the corporate dividends-received deduction for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 852 of the Internal Revenue Code, $8,531,014 was designated as a 20% rate gain distribution for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 854 of the Internal Revenue Code, $4,171,274 of income dividends paid during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 has been designated as qualified dividend income (QDI).
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, $44,802 has been designated as interest-related dividends for nonresident alien shareholders pursuant to Section 871 of the Internal Revenue Code.
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, $2,277,471 has been designated as short-term capital gain dividends for nonresident alien shareholders pursuant to Section 871 of the Internal Revenue Code.
PROXY VOTING INFORMATION
A description of the policies and procedures used to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-222-8222, visiting our website at wfam.com, or visiting the SEC website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the proxies related to portfolio securities were voted during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the website at wfam.com or by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS INFORMATION
The Fund and Portfolio file their complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year as an exhibit to their reports on Form N-PORT. Shareholders and Interest holders may view the filed Form N-PORT by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov.

40  |  Wells Fargo C& B Large Cap Value Fund


Other information (unaudited)
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS
Each of the Trustees and Officers listed in the table below acts in identical capacities for each fund in the Wells Fargo family of funds, which consists of 139 mutual funds comprising the Wells Fargo Funds Trust, Wells Fargo Variable Trust, Wells Fargo Master Trust and four closed-end funds (collectively the “Fund Complex”). This table should be read in conjunction with the Prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information1. The mailing address of each Trustee and Officer is 525 Market Street, 12th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105. Each Trustee and Officer serves an indefinite term, however, each Trustee serves such term until reaching the mandatory retirement age established by the Trustees.
Independent Trustees
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service*
Principal occupations during past five years or longer Current other
public company or
investment
company
directorships
William R. Ebsworth
(Born 1957)
Trustee,
since 2015
Retired. From 1984 to 2013, equities analyst, portfolio manager, research director and chief investment officer at Fidelity Management and Research Company in Boston, Tokyo, and Hong Kong, and retired in 2013 as Chief Investment Officer of Fidelity Strategic Advisers, Inc. where he led a team of investment professionals managing client assets. Prior thereto, Board member of Hong Kong Securities Clearing Co., Hong Kong Options Clearing Corp., the Thailand International Fund, Ltd., Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company, and Empire Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company. Audit Committee Chair and Investment Committee Chair of the Vincent Memorial Hospital Endowment (non-profit organization). Mr. Ebsworth is a CFA® charterholder. N/A
Jane A. Freeman
(Born 1953)
Trustee,
since 2015;
Chair Liaison,
since 2018
Retired. From 2012 to 2014 and 1999 to 2008, Chief Financial Officer of Scientific Learning Corporation. From 2008 to 2012, Ms. Freeman provided consulting services related to strategic business projects. Prior to 1999, Portfolio Manager at Rockefeller & Co. and Scudder, Stevens & Clark. Board member of the Harding Loevner Funds from 1996 to 2014, serving as both Lead Independent Director and chair of the Audit Committee. Board member of the Russell Exchange Traded Funds Trust from 2011 to 2012 and the chair of the Audit Committee. Ms. Freeman is also an inactive Chartered Financial Analyst. N/A
Isaiah Harris, Jr.
(Born 1952)
Trustee,
since 2009; Audit
Committee
Chair,
since 2019
Retired. Chairman of the Board of CIGNA Corporation since 2009, and Director since 2005. From 2003 to 2011, Director of Deluxe Corporation. Prior thereto, President and CEO of BellSouth Advertising and Publishing Corp. from 2005 to 2007, President and CEO of BellSouth Enterprises from 2004 to 2005 and President of BellSouth Consumer Services from 2000 to 2003. Emeritus member of the Iowa State University Foundation Board of Governors. Emeritus Member of the Advisory Board of Iowa State University School of Business. Advisory Board Member, Palm Harbor Academy (private school). Mr. Harris is a certified public accountant (inactive status). CIGNA Corporation
Judith M. Johnson
(Born 1949)
Trustee,
since 2008
Retired. Prior thereto, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund from 1996 to 2008. Ms. Johnson is an attorney, certified public accountant and a certified managerial accountant. N/A
David F. Larcker
(Born 1950)
Trustee,
since 2009
James Irvin Miller Professor of Accounting at the Graduate School of Business (Emeritus), Stanford University, Director of the Corporate Governance Research Initiative and Senior Faculty of The Rock Center for Corporate Governance since 2006. From 2005 to 2008, Professor of Accounting at the Graduate School of Business, Stanford University. Prior thereto, Ernst & Young Professor of Accounting at The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania from 1985 to 2005. N/A

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund  |  41


Other information (unaudited)
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service*
Principal occupations during past five years or longer Current other
public company or
investment
company
directorships
Olivia S. Mitchell
(Born 1953)
Trustee,
since 2006;
Nominating and
Governance
Committee Chair,
since 2018
International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans Professor, Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania since 1993. Director of Wharton’s Pension Research Council and Boettner Center on Pensions & Retirement Research, and Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. Previously, Cornell University Professor from 1978 to 1993. N/A
Timothy J. Penny
(Born 1951)
Trustee,
since 1996;
Chair,
since 2018
President and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Minnesota Initiative Foundation, a non-profit organization, since 2007. Member of the Board of Trustees of NorthStar Education Finance, Inc., a non-profit organization, since 2007. N/A
James G. Polisson
(Born 1959)
Trustee,
since 2018
Retired. Chief Marketing Officer, Source (ETF) UK Services, Ltd, from 2015 to 2017. From 2012 to 2015, Principal of The Polisson Group, LLC, a management consulting, corporate advisory and principal investing company. Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director at Russell Investments, Global Exchange Traded Funds from 2010 to 2012. Managing Director of Barclays Global Investors from 1998 to 2010 and Global Chief Marketing Officer for iShares and Barclays Global Investors from 2000 to 2010. Trustee of the San Francisco Mechanics’ Institute, a non-profit organization, from 2013 to 2015. Board member of the Russell Exchange Traded Fund Trust from 2011 to 2012. Director of Barclays Global Investors Holdings Deutschland GmbH from 2006 to 2009. Mr. Polisson is an attorney and has a retired status with the Massachusetts and District of Columbia Bar Associations. N/A
Pamela Wheelock
(Born 1959)
Trustee,
since January
2020; previously
Trustee from
January 2018 to
July 2019
Board member of the Destination Medical Center Economic Development Agency, Rochester, Minnesota since 2019. Interim President of the McKnight Foundation from January to September 2020. Acting Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Human Services, July 2019 through September 2019. Human Services Manager (part-time), Minnesota Department of Human Services, October 2019 through December 2019. Chief Operating Officer, Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity from 2017 to 2019. Vice President of University Services, University of Minnesota from 2012 to 2016. Prior thereto, on the Board of Directors, Governance Committee and Finance Committee for the Minnesota Philanthropy Partners (Saint Paul Foundation) from 2012 to 2018, Interim Chief Executive Officer of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota from 2011 to 2012, Chairman of the Board from 2009 to 2012 and Board Director from 2003 to 2015. Vice President, Leadership and Community Engagement, Bush Foundation, Saint Paul, Minnesota (a private foundation) from 2009 to 2011. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Minnesota Sports and Entertainment from 2004 to 2009 and Senior Vice President from 2002 to 2004. Executive Vice President of the Minnesota Wild Foundation from 2004 to 2008. Commissioner of Finance, State of Minnesota, from 1999 to 2002. Currently Board Chair of the Minnesota Wild Foundation since 2010. N/A
*  Length of service dates reflect the Trustee’s commencement of service with the Trust’s predecessor entities, where applicable.

42  |  Wells Fargo C& B Large Cap Value Fund


Other information (unaudited)
Officers
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service
Principal occupations during past five years or longer
Andrew Owen
(Born 1960)
President,
since 2017
Executive Vice President of Wells Fargo & Company and Head of Affiliated Managers, Wells Fargo Asset Management, since 2014. In addition, Mr. Owen is currently President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC since 2017. Prior thereto, Executive Vice President responsible for marketing, investments and product development for Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, from 2009 to 2014.
Jeremy DePalma
(Born 1974)
Treasurer,
since 2012
(for certain funds in
the Fund Complex);
since 2021 (for
the remaining funds in the
Fund Complex)
Senior Vice President of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC since 2009. Senior Vice President of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC from 2008 to 2010 and head of the Fund Reporting and Control Team within Fund Administration from 2005 to 2010.
Michelle Rhee
(Born 1966)
Chief Legal Officer,
since 2019
Secretary of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC and Chief Legal Counsel of Wells Fargo Asset Management since 2018. Deputy General Counsel of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. since 2020 and Assistant General Counsel of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. from 2018 to 2020. Associate General Counsel and Managing Director of Bank of America Corporation from 2004 to 2018.
Catherine Kennedy
(Born 1969)
Secretary,
since 2019
Vice President of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC and Senior Counsel of the Wells Fargo Legal Department since 2010. Vice President and Senior Counsel of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC from 1998 to 2010.
Michael H. Whitaker
(Born 1967)
Chief Compliance Officer,
since 2016
Chief Compliance Officer of Wells Fargo Asset Management since 2016. Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer for Fidelity Investments from 2007 to 2016.
1  The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about the Trustees and is available, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-222-8222 or by visiting the website at wfam.com.

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund  |  43


Other information (unaudited)
LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
In accordance with Rule 22e-4 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Liquidity Rule”), Wells Fargo Funds Trust and Wells Fargo Master Trust (each a “Trust”) has adopted and implemented a liquidity risk management program (the “Program”) on behalf of each of its series, including the Fund and the Portfolio, which is reasonably designed to assess and manage the Fund’s or the Portfolio’s liquidity risk. “Liquidity risk” is defined under the Liquidity Rule as the risk that the Fund or Portfolio is unable to meet redemption requests without significantly diluting remaining investors’ interests in the Fund or Portfolio. Each Trust’s Board of Trustees (each a “Board”) previously approved the designation of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”), the Fund’s investment manager and the Portfolio’s investment adviser, as the administrator of the Program, and Funds Management has established a Liquidity Risk Management Council (the “Council”) composed of personnel from multiple departments within Funds Management and its affiliates to assist Funds Management in the implementation and on-going administration of the Program.
The Program is comprised of various components designed to support the assessment and/or management of liquidity risk, including: (1) the periodic assessment (no less frequently than annually) of certain factors that influence the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s liquidity risk; (2) the periodic classification (no less frequently than monthly) of the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s investments into one of four liquidity categories that reflect an estimate of their liquidity under current market conditions; (3) a 15% limit on the acquisition of “illiquid investments” (as defined under the Liquidity Rule); (4) to the extent the Fund or the Portfolio does not invest primarily in “highly liquid investments” (as defined under the Liquidity Rule), the determination of a minimum percentage of the Fund’s or the Portfolio’s assets that generally will be invested in highly liquid investments (an “HLIM”); (5) if the Fund or the Portfolio has established an HLIM, the periodic review (no less frequently than annually) of the HLIM and the adoption of policies and procedures for responding to a shortfall of the Fund’s or the Portfolio’s “highly liquid investments” below its HLIM; and (6) periodic reporting to the Board.
At a meeting of the Board held on May 17-19, 2021, the Board received and reviewed a written report (the “Report”) from Funds Management that addressed the operation of the Program and assessed its adequacy and effectiveness for the period from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 (the “Reporting Period”). Among other things, the Report discussed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on liquidity and management of liquidity risk during the Reporting Period, including during the stressed market conditions caused by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. No significant liquidity events impacting the Fund or the Portfolio were noted in the Report. As applicable to the Fund and the Portfolio, there were no material changes to the Program during the Reporting Period.
Funds Management concluded in the Report that the Program is operating effectively to assess and manage the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s liquidity risk, and that the Program has been and continues to be adequately and effectively implemented to monitor and, as applicable, respond to the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s liquidity developments.
There can be no assurance that the Program will achieve its objectives under all circumstances in the future. Please refer to the Fund’s prospectus for more information regarding the Fund’s exposure to liquidity risk and other risks to which an investment in the Fund may be subject.

44  |  Wells Fargo C& B Large Cap Value Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
BOARD CONSIDERATION OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, ADVISORY AND SUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENTS:
Board Considerations – Current Agreements
Under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Board of Trustees (each, a “Board” and collectively, the “Boards”) of each of Wells Fargo Funds Trust (“Funds Trust”) and Wells Fargo Master Trust (“Master Trust”, and collectively, the “Trusts”) must determine annually whether to approve the continuation of the Trusts’ investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements, as applicable. In this regard, at a Board meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Meeting”), the Funds Trust Board, all the members of which have no direct or indirect interest in the investment management agreement and are not “interested persons” of the Trusts, as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), reviewed and approved for Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund (the “Gateway Fund”) an investment management agreement (the “Gateway Fund Management Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”).
At the Meeting, the Master Trust Board, all the members of which have no direct or indirect interest in the investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements and are Independent Trustees, reviewed and approved: (i) an investment advisory agreement (the “Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement”) with Funds Management for Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio, a portfolio of Master Trust (the “Master Portfolio”); and (ii) an investment sub-advisory agreement (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Cooke & Bieler L.P. (the “Sub-Adviser”) for the Master Portfolio.
The Gateway Fund and the Master Portfolio are collectively referred to as the “Funds.” The Gateway Fund Management Agreement, the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement are collectively referred to as the “Advisory Agreements.”
The Gateway Fund is a gateway feeder fund that invest substantially all of its assets in the Master Portfolio. The Master Portfolio has a substantially similar investment objective and substantially similar investment strategies to the Gateway Fund. Information provided to the Boards regarding the Gateway Fund is also applicable to the Master Portfolio, as relevant.
The Boards noted that Wells Fargo & Company (“Wells Fargo”) recently announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”), which includes Funds Management, to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. and/or their affiliates (the “Transaction”). The Boards further noted that the Transaction would result in a change-of-control of Funds Management, which would be considered to be an assignment that would result in the termination of the Advisory Agreements. In light of the Transaction, each Board separately considered for approval a new investment management agreement with Funds Management and, with respect to the Master Portfolio, the Master Trust Board considered for approval a new sub-advisory agreement with the Sub-Adviser (collectively, the “New Agreements”) that would replace the Advisory Agreements upon consummation of the Transaction, subject to approval of each respective New Agreement by each Fund’s shareholders. The Boards also considered for approval interim agreements to go into effect in the event shareholders do not approve the New Agreements before the Transaction is completed. The interim agreements would allow the Manager and the Sub-Adviser, as applicable, to continue providing services to the Funds while the Funds continue to seek shareholder approval of the New Agreements. The Boards noted that the terms of the interim agreements would be identical to those of the current Advisory Agreements, except for the term and certain escrow provisions.
At the Meeting, the Boards considered the factors and reached the conclusions described below relating to the selection of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser and the approval of the Advisory Agreements. Prior to the Meeting, including at Board meetings held in April and May 2021, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with representatives of Funds Management about these matters. Also, the Boards have adopted a team-based approach, with each team consisting of a sub-set of Trustees, to assist the full Boards in the discharge of their duties in reviewing investment performance and other matters throughout the year. The Independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Advisory Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately.
In providing information to the Boards, Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser were guided by a detailed set of requests for information submitted to them by independent legal counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees at the start of the Boards’ annual contract renewal process earlier in 2021. In considering and approving the Advisory Agreements, the Trustees considered the information they believed relevant, including but not limited to the information discussed below. The Boards considered not only the specific information presented in connection with the Meeting, but also the knowledge gained over time through interaction with Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser about various topics. In this regard, the Boards reviewed reports of Funds Management at each of their quarterly meetings, which included, among other things, portfolio reviews and investment performance reports. In addition, the Boards and the teams mentioned above confer with portfolio managers at various times throughout the year. The Boards did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each individual Trustee may have attributed different weights to various factors.

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund  |  45


Board considerations (unaudited)
After its deliberations, the Funds Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Gateway Fund Management Agreement for a one-year term. Additionally, after its deliberations, the Master Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement, each for a one-year term. The Boards considered the approval of the Advisory Agreements for the Funds as part of their consideration of agreements for funds across the complex, but their approvals were made on a fund-by-fund basis. The following summarizes a number of important, but not necessarily all, factors considered by the Boards in support of their approvals.
Nature, extent and quality of services
The Boards received and considered various information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser under the Advisory Agreements. This information included a description of the investment advisory services and Fund-level administrative services, as well as, among other things, a summary of the background and experience of senior management of WFAM, of which Funds Management is a part, and a summary of investments made in the business of WFAM. The Boards also received a description of Funds Management’s and the Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans, including a summary of the performance of such plans and any changes thereto during the COVID-19 pandemic, and of their approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity. The Boards also received and reviewed information about Funds Management’s role as administrator of the Funds’ liquidity risk management program, Funds Management’s approach to risk management, and Funds Management’s intermediary and vendor oversight program.
The Boards also considered the qualifications, background, tenure and responsibilities of each of the portfolio managers primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the Funds. The Boards evaluated the ability of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser to attract and retain qualified investment professionals, including research, advisory and supervisory personnel.
The Boards further considered the compliance programs and compliance records of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser. In addition, the Boards took into account the full range of services provided to the Funds by Funds Management and its affiliates. The Boards also considered information about retention and back-up arrangements that have been put into place with respect to key personnel of WFAM in connection with the anticipated Transaction, noting that WFAM provided assurances that the announcement and eventual culmination of the Transaction is not expected to result in any diminution in the nature or quality of services provided to the Funds.
Fund investment performance and expenses
The Boards considered the investment performance results for each of the Funds over various time periods ended December 31, 2020. The Boards considered these results in comparison to the investment performance of funds in a universe that was determined by Broadridge Inc. (“Broadridge”) to be similar to the Gateway Fund (the “Universe”), and in comparison to the Gateway Fund’s benchmark index and to other comparative data. Broadridge is an independent provider of investment company data. The Boards received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the performance Universe. The Funds Trust Board noted that the investment performance of the Gateway Fund (Administrator Class) was higher than the average investment performance of its Universe for the one-, three-, five- and ten-year periods ended December 31, 2020. The Funds Trust Board also noted that the investment performance of the Gateway Fund was higher than or in range of its benchmark index, the Russell 1000® Value Index, for all periods ended December 31, 2020.
The Master Trust Board took note of the investment performance of the Master Portfolio in the context of reviewing the investment performance of the Gateway Fund.
The Funds Trust Board also received and considered information regarding the Gateway Fund’s net operating expense ratios, which include fees and expenses of the Master Portfolio, and their various components, including actual management fees assessed at the Gateway Fund and Master Portfolio levels, custodian and other non-management fees, and Rule 12b-1 and non-Rule 12b-1 shareholder service fees. The Funds Trust Board considered these ratios in comparison to the median ratios of funds in class-specific expense groups that were determined by Broadridge to be similar to the Gateway Fund (the “Groups”). The Funds Trust Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the expense Groups and an explanation of how funds comprising expense groups and their expense ratios may vary from year-to-year. Based on the Broadridge reports, the Funds Trust Board noted that the net operating expense ratios of the Gateway Fund were lower than or in range of the median net operating expense ratios of its expense Groups for each share class.
With respect to the Master Portfolio, the Master Trust Board reviewed the fee rates that are payable to Funds Management for investment advisory services (as discussed below), which are the only fees charged at the Master Portfolio level, relative to a corresponding expense Group.

46  |  Wells Fargo C& B Large Cap Value Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
The Boards took into account the Funds’ investment performance and expense information provided to them among the factors considered in deciding to re-approve the Advisory Agreements.
Investment management, advisory and sub-advisory fee rates
The Funds Trust Board noted that Funds Management receives no advisory fees from the Gateway Fund as long as the Gateway Fund continues to invest all (or substantially all) of its assets in a single master portfolio. If the Gateway Fund were to change its investment structure so that it began investing in two or more master portfolios (a fund-of-funds), Funds Management would be entitled to receive an annual fee of 0.25% of the Gateway Fund’s average daily net assets for providing investment advisory services to the Gateway Fund, including allocating the Gateway Fund’s assets to the Master Portfolio.
The Funds Trust Board reviewed and considered the contractual fee rates that are payable by the Gateway Fund to Funds Management under the Gateway Fund Management Agreement for management services (other than investment advisory services), as well as the contractual fee rates payable by the Gateway Fund to Funds Management for class-level administrative services under a Class-Level Administration Agreement, which include, among other things, class-level transfer agency and sub-transfer agency costs (collectively, the “Management Rates”).
The Master Trust Board reviewed and considered the contractual investment advisory fee rate that is payable by the Master Portfolio to Funds Management for investment advisory services under the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement (the “Advisory Agreement Rate”). The Master Trust Board also reviewed and considered the contractual investment sub-advisory fee rate that is payable by Funds Management to the Sub-Adviser for investment sub-advisory services (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement Rate”).
Among other information reviewed by the Funds Trust Board was a comparison of the Gateway Fund’s Management Rate, which, for this purpose, includes the advisory fees paid at the Master Portfolio level, with the average contractual investment management fee rates of funds in the expense Groups at a common asset level as well as transfer agency costs of the funds in the expense Groups. The Funds Trust Board noted that the Management Rates of the Gateway Fund were in range of the sum of these average rates for the Gateway Fund’s expense Groups for each share class, and higher than the sum of these average rates for the Gateway Fund’s expense Groups for Class R6.
The Master Trust Board reviewed a comparison of the Advisory Agreement Rate of the Master Portfolio with those of other funds in the Master Portfolio’s expense Group at a common asset level. The Master Trust Board noted that the Advisory Agreement Rate of the Master Portfolio was in range of the median rate for the Master Portfolio’s expense Group.
The Master Trust Board also received and considered information about the portions of the total management fees that were retained by Funds Management after payment of the fees to the Sub-Adviser for sub-advisory services. The Master Trust Board considered these amounts in comparison to the median amount retained by advisers to funds in a sub-advised expense universe that was determined by Broadridge to be similar to the Master Portfolio. In assessing the reasonableness of these amounts, the Master Trust Board received and evaluated information about the nature and extent of responsibilities retained and risks assumed by Funds Management and not delegated to or assumed by the Sub-Adviser, and about Funds Management’s on-going oversight services. The Master Trust Board also considered that the sub-advisory fees paid to the Sub-Adviser had been negotiated by Funds Management on an arm’s length basis.
The Boards also received and considered information about the nature and extent of services offered and fee rates charged by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser to other types of clients with investment strategies similar to those of the Funds. In this regard, the Boards received information about the significantly greater scope of services, and compliance, reporting and other legal burdens and risks of managing proprietary mutual funds compared with those associated with managing assets of other types of clients, including third-party sub-advised fund clients and non-mutual fund clients such as institutional separate accounts.
Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Funds Trust Board determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the Gateway Fund Management Agreement was reasonable, and the Master Trust Board determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and to the Sub-Adviser under the Sub-Advisory Agreement was reasonable.
Profitability
The Boards received and considered information concerning the profitability of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo from providing services to the fund family as a whole. Funds Management reported on the methodologies and estimates used in calculating profitability, including a description of the methodology used to allocate certain expenses. Among other things, the Boards noted that the levels of profitability reported on a fund-by-fund basis varied widely, depending on factors such as the size, type and age of fund. The Boards did not consider profitability with respect to the Sub-Adviser, as the sub-advisory fees paid to the Sub-Adviser had been negotiated by Funds Management on an arm’s-length basis.

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund  |  47


Board considerations (unaudited)
Based on its review, the Boards did not deem the profits reported by Funds Management, WFAM or Wells Fargo from services provided to the Funds to be at a level that would prevent the Boards from approving the continuation of the Advisory Agreements.
Economies of scale
The Boards received and considered information about the potential for Funds Management to experience economies of scale in the provision of management services to the Funds, the difficulties of calculating economies of scale at an individual fund level, and the extent to which potential scale benefits are shared with shareholders of the Funds. The Boards noted the existence of breakpoints in the Master Portfolio’s advisory fee structure and the Gateway Fund’s management fee structure, which operate generally to reduce the Funds’ expense ratios as the Funds grow in size, and the size of the Master Portfolio and the Gateway Fund, respectively, in relation to such breakpoints. The Boards considered that, in addition to advisory fee and management fee breakpoints, Funds Management shares potential economies of scale from its management business in a variety of ways, including through fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangements, competitive management fee rates set at the outset without regard to breakpoints, and investments in the business intended to enhance services available to shareholders.
The Boards concluded that Funds Management’s arrangements with respect to each Fund, including contractual breakpoints, constituted a reasonable approach to sharing potential economies of scale with the Funds and their shareholders.
Other benefits to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser
The Boards received and considered information regarding potential “fall-out” or ancillary benefits received by Funds Management, the Sub-Adviser, and their affiliates as a result of their relationships with the Funds. Ancillary benefits could include, among others, benefits directly attributable to other relationships with the Funds and benefits potentially derived from an increase in Funds Management’s and the Sub-Adviser’s business as a result of their relationships with the Funds. The Boards noted that various affiliates of Funds Management may receive distribution-related fees, shareholder servicing payments and sub-transfer agency fees in respect of shares sold or held through them and services provided.
The Boards also reviewed information about soft dollar credits earned and utilized by the Sub-Adviser, fees earned by Funds Management and its affiliate from managing a private investment vehicle for the fund family’s securities lending collateral, and commissions earned by an affiliated broker from portfolio transactions.
Based on their consideration of the factors and information they deemed relevant, including those described here, the Boards did not find that any ancillary benefits received by Funds Management, the Sub-Adviser, and their affiliates were unreasonable.
Conclusion
At the Meeting, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Funds Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Gateway Fund Management Agreement for a one-year term. Additionally, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Master Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement, each for a one-year term.

48  |  Wells Fargo C& B Large Cap Value Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board Considerations - New Agreements
Overview of the Board evaluation process
At a meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Board Meeting”), the Board of Trustees of Wells Fargo Funds Trust (“Funds Trust”, and the series identified below, the “Funds”) approved the continuation of each Fund’s current Investment Management Agreement (the “Current Investment Management Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”) and the Board of Trustees of Wells Fargo Master Trust (“Master Trust”, and the series identified below in which each Fund invests substantially all of its assets, a “Master Portfolio”) approved the continuation of the current investment advisory agreement (the “Current Advisory Agreement”) with Funds Management, the current sub-advisory agreement with Wells Capital Management Incorporated (“Wells Capital”, and together with Funds Management, the “Advisers”), and the current sub-advisory agreements with Cooke & Bieler, L.P. (“C&B”) and Peregrine Capital Management, LLC (“Peregrine”, and together with C&B, the “Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers”)(collectively, the “Current Agreements”).
Funds Trust Master Trust
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio
Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio
Wells Fargo Index Fund Wells Fargo Index Portfolio
Wells Fargo Real Return Fund Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio
Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio
Each Trustee on the Funds Trust Board and the Master Trust Board of Trustees (collectively, the “Boards”) is not an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) of the Funds or the Master Portfolios (collectively, the “Independent Trustees”). The process followed by the Boards in considering and approving the continuation of each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s Current Agreements is referred to herein as the “2021 Annual Approval Process.”
As noted above, the closing of the sale of Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”) to a holding company (“NewCo”) affiliated with private funds of GTCR LLC (“GTCR”) and of Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. (“Reverence Capital”, and such transaction, the “Transaction”) will result in a change of control of Funds Management and Wells Capital, which will be considered to be an “assignment” of each Fund’s Current Agreements under the 1940 Act that will result in the automatic termination of each Fund’s Current Agreements. In light of the expected termination of each Fund’s Current Agreements upon the closing, at the Board Meeting the Boards also approved, as applicable: (i) for Funds Trust, a new investment management agreement with Funds Management (the “New Investment Management Agreement”); (ii) for the Master Trust, a new advisory agreement with Funds Management (the “New Advisory Agreement”); (iii) for Master Trust, a new sub-advisory agreement (the “New WellsCap Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Wells Capital for Emerging Growth Portfolio, Index Portfolio, Small Company Value Portfolio, Core Bond Portfolio and Real Return Portfolio; (iv) for Master Trust, a new sub-advisory agreement (the “New Peregrine Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Peregrine for Small Company Growth Portfolio; and (v) for Master Trust, a new sub-advisory agreement (the “New C&B Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with C&B for the C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio, each of which is intended to go into effect upon the closing (the “New Agreements”). The process followed by the Boards in reviewing and approving the New Agreements is referred to herein as the “New Agreement Approval Process.”
At a series of meetings held in April and May 2021 (collectively, “April and May 2021 Meetings”) and at the Board Meeting, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital about the New Agreements and related matters. The Boards reviewed and discussed information furnished by Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital that the Boards considered reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the New Agreements and the services to be provided. At these meetings, senior representatives from Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital made presentations to, and responded to questions from, the Boards.
In providing information to the Boards in connection with the 2021 annual approval process for the Current Agreements (the “2021 Annual Approval Process”) and the New Agreement Approval Process, Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital (as applicable) were guided by requests for information submitted by independent legal counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. In considering and approving the New Agreements, the Trustees considered the information they believed relevant, including but not limited to the information discussed herein. The Boards considered not only the specific information presented in connection with the April and May 2021 Meetings as well as the Board Meeting, but also the knowledge gained over time through interaction with Funds Management, as well as with Wells Capital and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers (collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”), about various topics. In this regard, the Boards review reports of Funds Management at each of their regular

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund  |  49


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board meetings, which includes, among other things, portfolio reviews and investment performance reports. In addition, the Boards confer with portfolio managers at various times throughout the year. The Boards were assisted in their evaluation of the New Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom the Independent Trustees received separate legal advice and with whom the Independent Trustees met separately. The Boards did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each individual Trustee may have attributed different weights to various factors.
Among other information considered by the Boards in connection with the Transaction was:
■  Information regarding the Transaction: information about the structure, financing sources and material terms and conditions of the Transaction, including the expected impact on the businesses conducted by the Advisers and by Wells Fargo Funds Distributor LLC, as the distributor of Fund shares.
■  Information regarding NewCo, GTCR and Reverence Capital: (i) information about NewCo, including information about its expected financial condition and access to capital, and senior leadership team; (ii) the experience of senior management at GTCR and Reverence Capital in acquiring portfolio companies; (iii) the plan to operationalize NewCo, including the transition of necessary infrastructure services through a transition services agreement with Wells Fargo under which Wells Fargo will continue to provide NewCo with certain services for a specified period of time after the closing; and (iv) information regarding regulatory matters, compliance, and risk management functions at NewCo, including resources to be dedicated thereto.
■  Impact of the Transaction on WFAM and Service Providers: (i) information regarding any changes to personnel and/or other resources of the Advisers as a result of the Transaction, including assurances regarding comparable and competitive compensation arrangements to attract and retain highly qualified personnel; and (ii) information about the organizational and operating structure with respect to NewCo, the Advisers and the Funds and Master Portfolios.
■  Impact of the Transaction on the Funds and their Shareholders and the Master Portfolios and their Interest Holders: (i) information regarding anticipated benefits to the Funds and the Master Portfolios as a result of the Transaction; (ii) a commitment that the Funds and Master Portfolios would not bear any expenses, directly or indirectly, in connection with the Transaction; (iii) confirmation that the Advisers and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers intend to continue to manage the Funds in a manner consistent with each Fund’s or Master Portfolio’s current investment objectives and principal investments strategies, as applicable; and (iv) a commitment that neither NewCo nor WFAM will take any steps that would impose any “unfair burden” (as that term is used in section 15(f)(1)(B) of the 1940 Act) on the Funds or the Master Portfolios as a result of the Transaction.
With respect to the New Agreements, the Boards considered: (i) a representation that, after the closing, all of the Funds and Master Portfolios will continue to be managed and advised by their current Advisers and Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, as applicable, and that the same portfolio managers are expected to continue to manage the Funds or Master Portfolios, as applicable, after the Transaction; (ii) information regarding the terms of the New Agreements, including changes as compared to the Current Agreements; (iii) information confirming that the fee rates payable under the New Agreements will not increase as a result of the Transaction as compared to the rates under the Current Agreements; and (iv) assurances that the Transaction is not expected to cause any diminution with respect to the nature, extent and quality of any of the services currently provided to the Funds or the Master Portfolios by the Advisers and Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers as a result of the Transaction.
In addition to considering information furnished specifically to evaluate the impact of the Transaction on the Funds and their respective shareholders and the Master Portfolios and their interest holders in connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards considered information furnished at prior meetings of the Boards and their committees, including detailed information provided in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process. In this regard, in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received information about complex-wide and individual Fund and Master Portfolio performance, fees and expenses, including: (i) a report from an independent data provider comparing the investment performance of each Fund or Master Portfolio to the investment performance of comparable funds and benchmark indices, over various time periods; (ii) a report from an independent data provider comparing each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s total expense ratio (and its components) to those of comparable funds; (iii) comparative information concerning the fees charged and services provided by the Advisers and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, to each Fund or Master Portfolio in managing other accounts (which may include other mutual funds, collective investment funds and institutional accounts), if any, that employ investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing such Fund(s) or Master Portfolio(s) as applicable; and (iv) profitability analyses of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo from providing services to the fund family as a whole.
After its deliberations, the Boards unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the respective New Agreements is reasonable, approved the respective New Agreements for a two-year term, and

50  |  Wells Fargo C& B Large Cap Value Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
voted to recommend that Fund shareholders approve the New Agreements. The Boards considered the approval of the New Agreements as part of their consideration of agreements for funds and master portfolios across the complex, but their approvals were made on a fund-by-fund basis. The following summarizes a number of important, but not necessarily all, factors considered by the Boards in support of their approvals.
Nature, extent and quality of services
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered various information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds and Master Portfolios by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the Current Agreements. This information included a description of the investment advisory services and Fund-level administrative services covered by the Current Agreements, as well as, among other things, a summary of the background and experience of senior management of WFAM, of which Funds Management and Wells Capital are a part, and a summary of investments made in the business of WFAM. The Boards also received a description of Funds Management’s and Wells Capital’s business continuity plans, including a summary of the performance of such plans and any changes thereto during the COVID-19 pandemic, and of their approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity. The Boards also received and reviewed information about Funds Management’s role as administrator of the Funds’ and Master Portfolios’ liquidity risk management program, Funds Management’s approach to risk management, and Funds Management’s intermediary and vendor oversight program.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also considered the qualifications, background, tenure and responsibilities of each of the portfolio managers primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the Funds and the Master Portfolios. The Boards evaluated the ability of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to attract and retain qualified investment professionals, including research, advisory and supervisory personnel.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards further considered the compliance programs and compliance records of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers. In addition, the Boards took into account the full range of services provided to the Funds by Funds Management and its affiliates.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards considered, among other information, the structure of the Transaction and expected impact, if any, of the Transaction on the operations, facilities, organization and personnel of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers. The Boards received assurances from Funds Management that each Fund and Master Portfolio will continue to be advised by its current Sub-Advisers after the closing, and that the same individual portfolio managers are expected to continue to manage the Funds and Master Portfolios, respectively, after the closing. With respect to the recruitment and retention of key personnel, the Boards noted information from GTCR, Reverence Capital and the Advisers regarding the potential benefits for employees of joining NewCo. The Boards recognized that the personnel of the Advisers who had been extended offers may not accept such offers, and personnel changes at the Advisers or the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers may occur in the future in the ordinary course.
In addition, the Boards considered information regarding the infrastructure, operational capabilities and support staff in place to assist in the portfolio management and operations of the Funds and Master Portfolios, as applicable, including the provision of administrative services, and the anticipated impact of the Transaction on such matters. The Boards also considered the business-related and other risks to which the Advisers and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers may be subject in managing the Funds and Master Portfolios, as applicable, and in connection with the Transaction. The Boards also considered the transition and integration plans as a result of the change in ownership of the Advisers from Wells Fargo to NewCo. The Boards considered the resources and infrastructure that NewCo intends to devote to its compliance program to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations, as well as its risk management program and cybersecurity program. The Boards also took into account assurances received from the Advisers, GTCR and Reverence Capital that the Transaction is not expected to cause any diminution in the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Advisers or the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers to the Funds and their shareholders or to the Master Portfolios and their interest holders, as applicable.
Fund investment performance and expenses
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards considered the investment performance results for each Fund over various time periods ended December 31, 2020. The Boards considered these results in comparison to the investment performance of funds in a universe that was determined by Broadridge Inc. (“Broadridge”) to be similar to each Fund (the “Universe”), and in comparison to each Fund’s benchmark index and to other comparative data. Broadridge is an independent provider of investment company data. The Boards received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the performance Universe. Where applicable, the Boards received information concerning, and discussed factors contributing to, underperformance of Funds relative to the Universe and benchmark for any underperformance periods.
The Master Trust Board of Trustees took note of the investment performance of the Master Portfolios in the context of reviewing the investment performance of the Funds.

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund  |  51


Board considerations (unaudited)
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also received and considered information regarding each Fund’s and Portfolio’s net operating expense ratios and their various components, including actual management fees, custodian and other non-management fees, and Rule 12b-1 and non-Rule 12b-1 shareholder service fees. The Boards considered these ratios in comparison to the median ratios of funds in class-specific expense groups that were determined by Broadridge to be similar to each Fund (the “Groups”). The Boards received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the expense Groups and an explanation of how funds comprising expense groups and their expense ratios may vary from year-to-year.
With respect to the Master Portfolios, the Master Trust Board of Trustees reviewed the fee rates that are payable to Funds Management for investment advisory services, which are the only fees charged at the Master Portfolio level, relative to a corresponding expense Group.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards received a commitment that WFAM will maintain fee and expense commitments for at least two years after the closing. The Boards took into account each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s investment performance and expense information among the factors considered in deciding to approve the New Agreements.
Investment management, advisory and sub-advisory fee rates
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board of Trustees of the Trust noted that Funds Management receives no advisory fees from a Fund as long as the Fund continues to invest all (or substantially all) of its assets in a single master portfolio. If a Fund were to change its investment structure so that it began investing in two or more master portfolios (a fund-of-funds), Funds Management would be entitled to receive an annual fee of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets for providing investment advisory services to the Fund, including allocating the Fund’s assets among the Master Portfolios.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board of Trustees of the Trust reviewed and considered the contractual fee rates that are payable by each Fund to Funds Management under the Fund’s Management Agreement for management services (other than investment advisory services), as well as the contractual fee rates payable by the Fund to Funds Management for class-level administrative services under a Class-Level Administration Agreement, which include, among other things, class-level transfer agency and subtransfer agency costs (collectively, the “Management Rates”). The Master Trust Board of Trustees reviewed and considered the contractual investment advisory fee rate that is payable by each Master Portfolio to Funds Management for investment advisory services under the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement (the “Advisory Agreement Rate”). The Master Trust Board of Trustees also reviewed and considered the contractual investment sub-advisory fee rates that are payable by Funds Management to the Sub-Advisers for investment sub-advisory services (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement Rates”).
Among other information reviewed by the Boards in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, was a comparison of each Fund’s Management Rates which, for this purpose, includes the advisory fees paid at the Master Portfolio level, with the average contractual investment management fee rates of funds in the expense Groups at a common asset level as well as transfer agency costs of the funds in the expense Groups.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also received and considered information about the nature and extent of services offered and fee rates charged by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to other types of clients, if any, with investment strategies similar to those of each Fund. In this regard, the Boards received information about the significantly greater scope of services, and compliance, reporting and other legal burdens and risks of managing proprietary mutual funds compared with those associated with managing assets of other types of clients, including third-party sub-advised fund clients and non-mutual fund clients such as institutional separate accounts.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards noted the assurances received by it that there would be no increases to any of the Management Rates, the Advisory Agreement Rates or the Sub-Advisory Agreement Rates as a result of the Transaction. The Boards also considered that the New Agreements do not change the computation method for calculating such fees, and there is no present intention to reduce expense waiver and reimbursement arrangements that are currently in effect. Based on their consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Boards determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the New Management Agreement and the New Advisory Agreement and payable to the Sub-Advisers under the New Sub-Advisory Agreements was reasonable.
Profitability
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered information concerning the profitability of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo from providing services to the fund family as a whole. The Boards noted that Wells Capital’s profitability information with respect to providing services to each Fund

52  |  Wells Fargo C& B Large Cap Value Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
and other funds in the family was subsumed in the WFAM and Wells Fargo profitability analysis. The Boards did not consider profitability with respect to the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, as the sub-advisory fees paid to the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers had been negotiated by Funds Management on an arm’s-length basis.
Funds Management reported on the methodologies and estimates used in calculating profitability in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, including a description of the methodology used to allocate certain expenses. Among other things, the Boards noted that the levels of profitability reported on a fund-by-fund basis varied widely, depending on factors such as the size, type and age of fund.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards received certain information about NewCo’s projected financial condition, and reviewed with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital the underlying assumptions on which such information was based. The Boards considered that NewCo is a newly formed entity, with no historical operations, revenues or expenses, and that it is difficult to predict with any degree of certainty the future profitability of NewCo and the Advisers from advisory activities under the New Agreements. The Boards considered that the fee rates payable under the New Agreements will not increase as a result of the Transaction as compared to the rates under the Current Agreements, and that the current contractual expense limitations applicable to each Fund will not increase. The Boards noted that if the New Agreements are approved by shareholders and the Transaction closes, the Boards will have the opportunity in the future to review the profitability of NewCo and the Advisers from advisory activities under the New Agreements with the Advisers.
Economies of scale
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered information about the potential for Funds Management to experience economies of scale in the provision of management services to the Funds and the Master Portfolios, the difficulties of calculating economies of scale at an individual fund level, and the extent to which potential scale benefits are shared with Fund shareholders. The Boards noted the existence of breakpoints in each Fund’s management fee structure and each Master Portfolio’s advisory fee structure, which operate generally to reduce each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s and expense ratios as they grows in size, and the size of each Fund and Master Portfolio and in relation to such breakpoints. The Boards considered that, in addition to advisory fee and management fee and advisory fee breakpoints, Funds Management shares potential economies of scale from its management business in a variety of ways, including through fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangements, competitive management fee rates set at the outset without regard to breakpoints, and investments in the business intended to enhance services available to shareholders.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards noted that NewCo and the Advisers may benefit from possible growth of the Funds and Master Portfolios resulting from enhanced distribution capabilities. However, the Boards noted that other factors could also affect the potential for economies of scale, and that it was not possible to quantify any potential future economies of scale. Based upon the information furnished to the Boards in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process and the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards concluded that Funds Management’s arrangements with respect to each Fund and Master Portfolio, including contractual breakpoints and expense limitation arrangements, constitute a reasonable approach to sharing potential economies of scale with the Fund and its shareholders and the Master Portfolio and its interest holders.
“Fall-out” benefits to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered information regarding potential “fall-out” or ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including Wells Capital, and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers as a result of their relationships with the Funds and the Master Portfolios, as applicable. Ancillary benefits could include, among others, benefits directly attributable to other relationships with the Funds and Master Portfolios and benefits potentially derived from an increase in Funds Management’s and the Wells Capital’s business as a result of their relationships with the Funds and the Master Portfolios. The Boards noted that various current affiliates of Funds Management may receive distribution-related fees, shareholder servicing payments and sub-transfer agency fees in respect of shares sold or held through them and services provided.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also reviewed information about any soft dollar credits earned and utilized by the Sub-Advisers, fees earned by Funds Management and Wells Capital from managing a private investment vehicle for the fund family’s securities lending collateral, and commissions earned by an affiliated broker of Wells Fargo from portfolio transactions.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards received information to the effect that the Transaction is not expected to have a material impact on the fall-out benefits currently realized by Funds Management and its affiliates, including Wells Capital, and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers. The information reviewed by the Boards also noted that several of the ancillary benefits identified for WFAM would be potential ancillary benefits for NewCo, including that the scale and reputation of

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund  |  53


Board considerations (unaudited)
the Funds and Master Portfolios might benefit NewCo’s broader reputation, product initiatives, technology investment and talent acquisition. Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Boards did not find that any ancillary benefits expected to be received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including NewCo and Wells Capital and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, under the New Agreements were unreasonable.
Conclusion
At the Board Meeting, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Boards unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the New Agreements is reasonable, approved the New Agreements for a two-year term, and voted to recommend that Fund shareholders approve the New Agreements.

54  |  Wells Fargo C& B Large Cap Value Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board Considerations - Interim Agreements
At a meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Board Meeting”), the Boards of Trustees (each, a “Board”, and collectively, the “Boards”) of Wells Fargo Funds Trust, Wells Fargo Master Trust, Wells Fargo Variable Trust, Wells Fargo Global Dividend Opportunity Fund, Wells Fargo Income Opportunities Fund, Wells Fargo Multi-Sector Income Fund and Wells Fargo Utilities and High Income Fund (each a “Trust”, and the series thereof, a “Fund”) reviewed and approved for the Trusts and Funds, as applicable: (i) interim investment management agreements (the “Interim Management Agreements”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”); (ii) interim investment advisory agreements (the “Interim Advisory Agreements”) with Funds Management; and (iii) interim sub-advisory agreements (the “Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements”) with each of Cooke & Bieler, L.P., Galliard Capital Management LLC (“Galliard”), Peregrine Capital Management Inc., Wells Capital Management LLC (“WellsCap”), and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited (“WFAMI”, and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”). Each Trustee on the Board is not an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) of the Funds (collectively, the “Independent Trustees”). The Interim Management Agreements, Interim Advisory Agreements, and Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements are collectively referred to as the “Interim Advisory Agreements.”
At the Board Meeting, the Boards reviewed and approved the continuation of existing investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements (the “Current Advisory Agreements”) for each Trust and Fund, as applicable. The factors considered and conclusions reached by the Boards in approving the Current Advisory Agreements are summarized in the section entitled “Board Considerations – Current Agreements” of this shareholder report. The Boards noted that Wells Fargo & Company has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”), which includes Funds Management, Galliard, WellsCap and WFAMI (the “Affiliated Sub-Advisers”), to a holding company affiliated with private funds of GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. (the “Transaction”). The Boards further noted that the Transaction would result in a change-of-control of Funds Management and the Affiliated Sub-Advisers, which would be considered to be an “assignment” under the 1940 Act that would terminate the Current Advisory Agreements. At the Board Meeting, the Boards also reviewed and approved new investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements (the “New Advisory Agreements”) for each Trust and Fund, as applicable, that would replace the Current Advisory Agreements upon consummation of the Transaction, subject to approval of the New Advisory Agreements by the applicable Trust’s or Fund’s shareholders. The factors considered and conclusions reached by the Boards in approving the New Advisory Agreements are summarized in the section entitled “Board Considerations – New Agreements” of this shareholder report.
At the Board Meeting, the Boards also approved the Interim Advisory Agreements, which will go into effect for a Trust or Fund only in the event that shareholders of such Trust or Fund do not approve the New Advisory Agreement(s) for the Trust or Fund by the closing date of the Transaction, when the Current Advisory Agreements will terminate. The Board noted that, in such a circumstance, the Interim Advisory Agreements will permit continuity of management by allowing Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to continue providing services to the Trust or Fund pursuant to the Interim Advisory Agreements while the Trust or Fund continues to solicit shareholder approval of such New Advisory Agreement(s). The Boards noted that the terms of the Interim Advisory Agreements are identical to those of the Current Advisory Agreements, except for the term and the addition of escrow provisions with respect to the advisory fees. The Boards also noted that the entities that would service the Funds and Trusts under the Interim Advisory Agreements are identical to those that provide services under the Current Advisory Agreements and those that will provide services under the New Advisory Agreements.
In approving the Interim Advisory Agreements, the Boards considered the same factors and reached the same conclusions as they considered and reached with respect to the Boards’ approvals of the Current Advisory Agreements and New Advisory Agreements, as applicable, which are described in separate Board Consideration sections within this shareholder report. Prior to the Board Meeting, including at a series of meetings held in April and May 2021, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. about the Interim Advisory Agreements and related matters. The Independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Interim Advisory Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately.
At the Board Meeting, after considering the factors and reaching the conclusions described in the separate Board Consideration sections within this shareholder report, the Boards unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and to each Sub-Adviser under each of the Interim Advisory Agreements was reasonable, and approved the Interim Advisory Agreements.

Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund  |  55


For more information
More information about Wells Fargo Funds is available free upon request. To obtain literature, please write, visit the Fund's website, or call:
Wells Fargo Funds
P.O. Box 219967
Kansas City, MO 64121-9967
Website: wfam.com
Individual investors: 1-800-222-8222
Retail investment professionals: 1-888-877-9275
Institutional investment professionals: 1-866-765-0778
This report and the financial statements contained herein are submitted for the general information of the shareholders of the Fund. If this report is used for promotional purposes, distribution of the report must be accompanied or preceded by a current prospectus. Before investing, please consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of the investment. For a current prospectus and, if available, a summary prospectus, containing this information, call 1-800-222-8222 or visit the Fund's website at wfam.com. Read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) is the trade name for certain investment advisory/management firms owned by Wells Fargo & Company. These firms include but are not limited to Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC. Certain products managed by WFAM entities are distributed by Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC (a broker-dealer and Member FINRA).
This material is for general informational and educational purposes only and is NOT intended to provide investment advice or a recommendation of any kind - including a recommendation for any specific investment, strategy, or plan.
 INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED  ■  NO BANK GUARANTEE  ■  MAY LOSE VALUE 
© 2021 Wells Fargo & Company. All rights reserved.
PAR-0621-00758 07-21
A280/AR280 05-21


Annual Report
May 31, 2021
Wells Fargo
Diversified Equity Fund




Contents
 
Reduce clutter.
Save trees.
Sign up for electronic delivery of prospectuses and shareholder reports at wellsfargo.com/ advantagedelivery
The views expressed and any forward-looking statements are as of May 31, 2021, unless otherwise noted, and are those of the Fund's portfolio managers and/or Wells Fargo Asset Management. Discussions of individual securities or the markets generally are not intended as individual recommendations. Future events or results may vary significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. The views expressed are subject to change at any time in response to changing circumstances in the market. Wells Fargo Asset Management and the Fund disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any views expressed or forward-looking statements.
 INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED  ■  NO BANK GUARANTEE  ■  MAY LOSE VALUE 

Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund  |  1


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
Andrew Owen
President
Wells Fargo Funds
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to offer you this annual report for the Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021. Despite the initial challenges presented by the spread of COVID-19 cases and the business restrictions implemented throughout much of the world, global stocks showed robust returns, supported by global stimulus programs, a rapid vaccination rollout, and recovering consumer and corporate sentiment. Bond markets mostly produced positive returns, as investors searched for yield and diversification during difficult market stretches.
For the 12-month period, equities had robust returns, as policymakers continued to fight the effects of COVID-19. Emerging market stocks led both non-U.S. developed market equities and U.S. stocks. Gains by fixed-income securities were varied, though mostly positive. For the period, U.S. stocks, based on the S&P 500 Index,1 gained 40.32%. International stocks, as measured by the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net),2 returned 42.78%, while the MSCI EM Index (Net),3 had stronger performance, with a 51.00% gain. Among bond indexes, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index,4 returned -0.40%, the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (unhedged),5 gained 7.84%, the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index,6 returned 4.74%, and the ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index,7 returned 15.18%.
The COVID-19 lockdown began over a year ago.
By June, economies started to reopen and global central banks committed to do all they could to provide economic support through liquidity and low borrowing costs. U.S. economic activity was aided by one-time $1,200 stimulus checks and $600 weekly bonus unemployment benefits that lasted through July. However, unemployment remained historically high and COVID-19 cases began to increase by late June. China’s economic recovery began to pick up momentum.
July was broadly positive for equities and fixed income. However, economic data and a resurgence of COVID-19 cases underscored the urgent need to regain control of the pandemic. Second-quarter gross domestic product (GDP) shrank from the previous quarter by 9.5% and 12.1% in the U.S. and the eurozone, respectively. In contrast, China’s second-quarter GDP grew 3.2% year over year. The U.S. economy added 1.8 million jobs in July, but a double-digit jobless rate persisted.

1 The S&P 500 Index consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. It is a market-value-weighted index with each stock's weight in the index proportionate to its market value. You cannot invest directly in an index.
2 The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) All Country World Index (ACWI) ex USA Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed and emerging markets, excluding the United States. Source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI. You cannot invest directly in an index.
3 The MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure equity market performance of emerging markets. You cannot invest directly in an index.
4 The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based benchmark that measures the investment-grade, U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage pass-throughs), asset-backed securities, and commercial mortgage-backed securities. You cannot invest directly in an index.
5 The Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (unhedged) is an unmanaged index that provides a broad-based measure of the global investment-grade fixed-income markets excluding the U.S. dollar-denominated debt market. You cannot invest directly in an index.
6 The Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index composed of long-term tax-exempt bonds with a minimum credit rating of Baa. You cannot invest directly in an index.
7 The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index of domestic and Yankee high-yield bonds. The index tracks the performance of high-yield securities traded in the U.S. bond market. You cannot invest directly in an index. Copyright 2021. ICE Data Indices, LLC. All rights reserved.

2  |  Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
The stock market continued to rally in August despite concerns over rising numbers of U.S. and European COVID-19 cases as well as the July expiration of the $600 weekly bonus unemployment benefit. Relatively strong second-quarter earnings boosted investor sentiment along with the U.S. Federal Reserve Board’s (Fed’s) announcement of a monetary policy shift expected to support longer-term low interest rates. U.S. manufacturing and services activity indexes beat expectations while the U.S. housing market maintained strength. In Europe, retail sales expanded and consumer confidence was steady. China’s economy continued to expand.
Stocks grew more volatile in September on mixed economic data. U.S. economic activity continued to grow. However, U.S. unemployment remained elevated at 7.9% in September. With the U.S. Congress delaying further fiscal relief and uncertainties surrounding a possible vaccine, doubts crept back into the financial markets. In the U.K., a lack of progress in Brexit talks weighed on markets. China’s economy picked up steam, fueled by increased global demand.
In October, capital markets stepped back from their six-month rally. Market volatility rose in advance of the U.S. election and amid a global increase in COVID-19 infections. Europe introduced tighter restrictions affecting economic activity. U.S. markets looked favorably at the prospect of Democratic control of the federal purse strings, which could lead to additional fiscal stimulus and a boost to economic activity. Meanwhile, China reported 4.9% third-quarter GDP growth.
Global stocks rallied in November, propelled by optimism over three promising COVID-19 vaccines. Reversing recent trends, value stocks outperformed growth stocks and cyclical stocks outpaced information technology (IT) stocks. However, U.S. unemployment remained elevated, with a net job loss of 10 million since February. The eurozone services Purchasing Managers' Index, a monthly survey of purchasing managers, contracted sharply while the region’s manufacturing activity grew. The U.S. election results added to the upbeat mood as investors anticipated more consistent policies in the new administration.
Financial markets ended the year with strength on high expectations for a rapid rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines, the successful passage of a $900 billion stimulus package, and rising expectations of additional economic support from a Democratic-led Congress. U.S. economic data were mixed with still-elevated unemployment and weak retail sales but growth in manufacturing output. In contrast, China’s economic expansion continued in both manufacturing and nonmanufacturing. U.S. COVID-19 infection rates continued to rise even as new state and local lockdown measures were implemented.
The calendar year 2021 began with emerging market stocks leading all major asset classes in January, driven by China’s strong economic growth and a broad recovery in corporate earnings, which propelled China’s stock market higher. In the U.S., positive news on vaccine trials and January expansion in both the manufacturing and services sectors was offset by a weak December monthly jobs report. This was compounded by technical factors as some hedge funds were forced to sell stocks to protect themselves against a well-publicized short squeeze coordinated by a group of retail investors. Eurozone sentiment and economic growth were particularly weak, reflecting the impact of a new lockdown with stricter social distancing along with a slow vaccine rollout.
February saw major domestic equity indexes driven higher on the hope of a new stimulus bill, improving COVID-19 vaccination numbers, and the gradual reopening of the economy. Most S&P 500 companies reported better-than-expected earnings, with positive surprises coming from the financials, IT, health care, and materials sectors. Japan saw its economy strengthen as a result of strong export numbers. Meanwhile, crude oil prices continued their climb, rising more than 25% for the year. Domestic government bonds experienced a sharp sell-off in late February as markets priced in a more robust economic recovery and higher future growth and inflation expectations.
Global stocks rallied in November, propelled by optimism over three promising COVID-19 vaccines.

Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund  |  3


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
The passage of the massive domestic stimulus bill highlighted March activity, leading to increased forecasts for U.S. growth in 2021.
The passage of the massive domestic stimulus bill highlighted March activity, leading to increased forecasts for U.S. growth in 2021. Domestic employment surged as COVID-19 vaccinations and an increasingly open economy spurred hiring. A majority of U.S. small companies reported they were operating at pre-pandemic capacity or higher. Value stocks continued its outperformance of growth stocks in the month, continuing the trend that started in late 2020. Meanwhile, most major developed global equity indexes were up month to date on the back of rising optimism regarding the outlook for global growth. While the U.S. and U.K. have been the most successful in terms of the vaccine rollout, even in markets where the vaccine has lagged, such as in the eurozone and Japan, equity indexes in many of those countries have also been in positive territory this year.
Equity markets produced another strong showing in April. Domestically, the continued reopening of the economy had a strong impact on positive equity performance, as people started leaving their households and jobless claims continued to fall. Domestic corporate bonds performed well and the U.S. dollar weakened. Meanwhile, the U.S. government continued to seek to invest in the recovery, this time by outlining a package of over $2 billion to improve infrastructure. The primary headwind in April was inflation, as investors tried to determine the breadth and longevity of recent price increases. Developed Europe has been supported by a meaningful increase in the pace of vaccinations. Unfortunately many emerging market countries have not been as successful. India in particular has seen COVID-19 cases surge, serving as an example of the need to get vaccinations rolled out to less developed nations.
Vaccine rollouts continued in May, leading to loosened restrictions globally. As a result, equity markets in general saw a minor increase in returns. Concerns that the continued economic rebound could result in inflation increases becoming more than transitory were supported by the higher input costs businesses are experiencing. Meanwhile, those inflation concerns were tempered by the Fed, which stayed steady on its view of the economy and eased fears of a sudden and substantial policy change. Positive performance in the emerging market equity space was supported this month by steady consumer demand and strong commodity prices. Fixed-income markets were also slightly positive for the month, driven by inflation uncertainty and a softer U.S. dollar.
Don’t let short-term uncertainty derail long-term investment goals.
Periods of investment uncertainty can present challenges, but experience has taught us that maintaining long-term investment goals can be an effective way to plan for the future. Although diversification cannot guarantee an investment profit or prevent losses, we believe it can be an effective way to manage investment risk and potentially smooth out overall portfolio performance. We encourage investors to know their investments and to understand that appropriate levels of risk-taking may unlock opportunities.
Thank you for choosing to invest with Wells Fargo Funds. We appreciate your confidence in us and remain committed to helping you meet your financial needs.
Sincerely,
Andrew Owen
President
Wells Fargo Funds

For further information about your Fund, contact your investment professional, visit our website at wfam.com, or call us directly at 1-800-222-8222.

4  |  Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund


This page is intentionally left blank.


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Investment objective The Fund seeks long-term total capital appreciation.
Manager Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC
Portfolio managers Aldo Ceccarelli, CFA®
    
Average annual total returns (%) as of May 31, 2021
    Including sales charge   Excluding sales charge   Expense ratios1 (%)
  Inception date 1 year 5 year 10 year   1 year 5 year 10 year   Gross Net 2
Class A (NVDAX) 5-2-1996 35.74 13.50 10.74   44.02 14.85 11.40   1.40 1.25
Class C (WFDEX) 10-1-1998 41.88 14.00 10.57   42.88 14.00 10.57   2.15 2.00
Administrator Class (NVDEX) 11-11-1994   44.30 15.13 11.67   1.32 1.00
Diversified Equity Blended Index3   43.48 16.03 12.85  
MSCI EAFE Index (Net)4   38.41 9.77 5.88  
Russell 1000® Growth Index5   39.92 22.07 16.98  
Russell 1000® Value Index6   44.38 12.33 11.51  
Russell 2000® Index7   64.56 16.01 11.86  
S&P 500 Index8   40.32 17.16 14.38  
Figures quoted represent past performance, which is no guarantee of future results, and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder may pay on an investment in a fund. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance shown without sales charges would be lower if sales charges were reflected. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted, which assumes the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. Current month-end performance is available on the Fund’s website, wfam.com.
Please keep in mind that high double-digit returns were primarily achieved during favorable market conditions. You should not expect that such favorable returns can be consistently achieved. A fund’s performance, especially for short time periods, should not be the sole factor in making your investment decision.
Index returns do not include transaction costs associated with buying and selling securities, any mutual fund fees or expenses, or any taxes. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
For Class A shares, the maximum front-end sales charge is 5.75%. For Class C shares, the maximum contingent deferred sales charge is 1.00%. Performance including a contingent deferred sales charge assumes the sales charge for the corresponding time period. Administrator Class shares are sold without a front-end sales charge or contingent deferred sales charge.
1 Reflects the expense ratios as stated in the most recent prospectuses, which include the impact of 0.51% in acquired fund fees and expenses. The expense ratios shown are subject to change and may differ from the annualized expense ratios shown in the financial highlights of this report, which do not include acquired fund fees and expenses.
2 The manager has contractually committed through September 30, 2021, to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers at 1.25% for Class A, 2.00% for Class C, and 1.00% for Administrator Class. Brokerage commissions, stamp duty fees, interest, taxes, acquired fund fees and expenses (if any) from funds in which the affiliated master portfolios and funds invest and from money market funds, and extraordinary expenses are excluded from the expense caps. All other acquired fund fees and expenses from the affiliated master portfolios are included in the expense caps. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. Without these caps, the Fund’s returns would have been lower. The expense ratio paid by an investor is the net expense ratio (the total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers) as stated in the prospectuses.
3 Source: Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC. The Diversified Equity Blended Index is composed 25% of the S&P 500 Index, 25% of the Russell 1000® Growth Index, 25% of the Russell 1000® Value Index, 15% of the MSCI EAFE Index (Net), and 10% of the Russell 2000® Index. You cannot invest directly in an index.
4 The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) Europe, Australasia, Far East (EAFE) Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the United States and Canada. Source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indexes or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI. You cannot invest directly in an index.
5 The Russell 1000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 companies with higher price/book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. You cannot invest directly in an index.
6 The Russell 1000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 companies with lower price/book ratios and lower forecasted growth values. You cannot invest directly in an index.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.

6  |  Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Growth of $10,000 investment as of May 31, 20211
1 The chart compares the performance of Class A shares for the most recent ten years with the Diversified Equity Blended Index, MSCI EAFE Index (Net), Russell 1000® Growth Index, Russell 1000® Value Index, Russell 2000® Index and S&P 500 Index. The chart assumes a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in Class A shares and reflects all operating expenses and assumes the maximum initial sales charge of 5.75%.
Footnotes continued from previous page
7 The Russell 2000® Index measures the performance of the 2,000 smallest companies in the Russell 3000® Index, which represents approximately 8% of the total market capitalization of the Russell 3000® Index. You cannot invest directly in an index.
8 The S&P 500 Index consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. It is a market-value weighted index with each stock’s weight in the index proportionate to its market value. You cannot invest directly in an index.
Stock values fluctuate in response to the activities of individual companies and general market and economic conditions. The use of derivatives may reduce returns and/or increase volatility. Certain investment strategies tend to increase the total risk of an investment (relative to the broader market). The Fund is exposed to foreign investment risk and smaller-company securities risk. Consult the Fund’s prospectus for additional information on these and other risks.

Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund  |  7


Performance highlights (unaudited)
MANAGER'S DISCUSSION
Fund highlights
The Fund (Class A, excluding sales charges) outperformed its benchmark, Diversified Equity Blended Index for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021.
Relative outperformance by the underlying equity investments was the most significant contributor to relative performance over the period.
Five of the underlying investments outperformed their respective benchmarks while five underperformed. The largest contributors to performance were the Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio and the Wells Fargo Large Company Value Portfolio.
Stock markets posted remarkable gains as the world recuperated from the pandemic.
The 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021, saw strong results from the large-cap U.S. equity markets, as illustrated by the Russell 1000® Index’s* return of 42.66%. Within the U.S. equity markets, small-capitalization stocks outperformed the large-capitalization market. The small-cap companies illustrated by the Russell 2000® Index returned 64.56%. The broad foreign markets also did well, as reflected by the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index’s** return of 42.78%. Aided by unprecedented levels of monetary and fiscal stimulus, the economy staged an impressive recovery from the pandemic contraction and risky assets performed very well.
Holdings (%) as of May 31, 20211
Wells Fargo Index Portfolio 25.17
Wells Fargo Diversified Large Cap Growth Portfolio 24.56
Wells Fargo Large Company Value Portfolio 16.96
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio 8.48
Wells Fargo Disciplined International Developed Markets Portfolio 7.58
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio 7.57
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio 5.03
Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio 2.44
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio 2.30
1 Figures represent the percentage of the Fund's net assets. Holdings are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
The Fund’s underlying holdings displayed similar patterns. Underlying U.S. equity funds as a group produced solid absolute returns. The Fund experienced strong returns from its value-based strategies. Large-cap U.S. growth stocks
enjoyed a remarkable return of more than 51% over the 12-month period, yet because of conservative positioning, our holdings in this space lagged, with a return of 48%. This was the largest single detractor from relative performance over the period. International equity funds also performed well, posting strong absolute returns and narrowly outperforming their respective benchmarks on balance.
There were no changes to the Fund’s strategic composition.
The Fund’s asset allocation among underlying funds remains aligned with the composition of its blended benchmark: 25% in U.S. large-cap value portfolios, 25% in U.S. large-cap blend portfolios, 25% in U.S. large-cap growth portfolios, 10% in U.S. small-cap portfolios, and 15% in international portfolios.
Looking ahead, we are guardedly optimistic.
The massive amount of uncertainty we faced last year at this time has faded. While the daunting impacts of the virus, U.S. civil unrest, domestic politics, and geopolitical tensions are still very fresh in our mind’s eye, we increasingly see these issues in the rear-view mirror. The rollout of the vaccine, the reduction of political rhetoric, and a very accommodative Federal Reserve Board (Fed) have all helped calm fears. While COVID-19 cases are declining and America is returning to work, we are focused on understanding the economic impacts of the recent unprecedented monetary and fiscal policy effects on the portfolio. While we expect equity markets will continue to advance over the next 12 months, it may be at a much slower pace than over the past 12 months.
 

* The Russell 1000® Index measures the performance of the 1,000 largest companies in the Russell 3000® Index, which represents approximately 92% of the total market capitalization of the Russell 3000® Index. You cannot invest directly in an index.
** The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) All Country World Index (ACWI) ex USA Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed and emerging markets, excluding the U.S. Source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indexes or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI. You cannot invest directly in an index.

8  |  Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Allocation (%) as of May 31, 2021
  Neutral
allocation
Effective
allocation1
U.S. Large Cap Stock Funds 75 75
International Stock Funds 15 15
U.S. Small Cap Stock Funds 10 10
1 Effective allocation includes the effect of any tactical futures overlay that may be in place. Effective cash, if any, represents the net offset to such future positions. These amounts are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
We believe there are new risks around the corner. We are very concerned about future inflation and are not fully convinced it is transitory in nature. The U.S. Treasury is issuing a large quantity of bonds, the Fed is purchasing a large quantity of bonds, and we continue to monitor closely the duration and credit composition of our fixed-income investments. There are many unknowns, and despite some optimism, we continue to monitor the situation very carefully.
 

Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund  |  9


Fund expenses (unaudited)
As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and contingent deferred sales charges (if any) on redemptions and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) and/or shareholder servicing fees, and other Fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period from December 1, 2020 to May 31, 2021.
Actual expenses
The “Actual” line of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the “Actual” line under the heading entitled “Expenses paid during period” for your applicable class of shares to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes
The “Hypothetical” line of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) and contingent deferred sales charges. Therefore, the “Hypothetical” line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
  Beginning
account value
12-1-2020
Ending
account value
5-31-2021
Expenses
paid during
the period1,2
Annualized net
expense ratio2
Class A        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,184.69 $ 6.75 1.24%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,018.75 $ 6.24 1.24%
Class C        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,179.94 $10.82 1.99%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,015.01 $10.00 1.99%
Administrator Class        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,185.92 $ 5.45 1.00%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,019.95 $ 5.04 1.00%
1 Expenses paid is equal to the annualized net expense ratio of each class multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one-half-year period).
2 Amounts reflect net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios in which the Fund invests.

10  |  Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

          Value
Investment companies:  100.09%          
Affiliated master portfolios:  100.09%          
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio         $  14,798,896
Wells Fargo Disciplined International Developed Markets Portfolio          13,218,343
Wells Fargo Diversified Large Cap Growth Portfolio          42,836,761
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio           4,006,056
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio          13,198,807
Wells Fargo Index Portfolio          43,900,204
Wells Fargo Large Company Value Portfolio          29,588,570
Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio           4,250,949
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio           8,784,324
Total Investment companies (Cost $133,870,532)         174,582,910
Total investments in securities (Cost $133,870,532) 100.09%       174,582,910
Other assets and liabilities, net (0.09)          (153,117)
Total net assets 100.00%       $174,429,793
Transactions with the affiliated Master Portfolios were as follows:
  % of
ownership,
beginning
of period
% of
ownership,
end of
period
Net realized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Dividends
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Affiliated
income
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Value,
end of
period
  % of
net
assets
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio 3.77% 3.60% $ 1,473,763   $ 4,385,487   $ 233,756   $ 248   $ 14,798,896    
Wells Fargo Disciplined International Developed Markets Portfolio 5.81 6.46 2,394,142   1,285,276   321,716   3,660   13,218,343    
Wells Fargo Diversified Large Cap Growth Portfolio 16.37 15.01 6,468,455   5,517,045   293,707   1,528   42,836,761    
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio 0.54 0.42 1,048,821   716,870   4,953   1,190   4,006,056    
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio 0.00 1.85 378,768   864,102   149,572   44   13,198,807    
Wells Fargo Index Portfolio 3.39 3.36 3,371,559   9,448,425   605,981   270   43,900,204    
Wells Fargo International Value Portfolio 1.23 0.00 (194,772)   2,568,759   215,086   1,734   0    
Wells Fargo Large Company Value Portfolio 10.44 10.22 11,127,169   (434,371)   513,940   452   29,588,570    
Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio 0.26 0.31 1,027,077   711,132   17,469   370   4,250,949    
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio 1.51 1.42 642,807   3,878,256   109,676   713   8,784,324    
      $27,737,789   $28,940,981   $2,465,856   $10,209   $174,582,910   100.09%
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund  |  11


Statement of assets and liabilities—May 31, 2021
   
Assets  
Investments in affiliated Master Portfolios, at value (cost $133,870,532)

$ 174,582,910
Receivable for Fund shares sold

30,485
Total assets

174,613,395
Liabilities  
Payable for Fund shares redeemed

66,606
Shareholder servicing fees payable

36,723
Management fee payable

33,625
Administration fees payable

24,067
Distribution fee payable

1,067
Trustees’ fees and expenses payable

4
Accrued expenses and other liabilities

21,510
Total liabilities

183,602
Total net assets

$174,429,793
Net assets consist of  
Paid-in capital

$ 121,333,200
Total distributable earnings

53,096,593
Total net assets

$174,429,793
Computation of net asset value and offering price per share  
Net assets – Class A

$ 71,971,374
Shares outstanding – Class A1

2,661,006
Net asset value per share – Class A

$27.05
Maximum offering price per share – Class A2

$28.70
Net assets – Class C

$ 1,698,385
Shares outstanding – Class C1

75,303
Net asset value per share – Class C

$22.55
Net assets – Administrator Class

$ 100,760,034
Shares outstanding – Administrator Class1

3,700,413
Net asset value per share – Administrator Class

$27.23
1 The Fund has an unlimited number of authorized shares.
2 Maximum offering price is computed as 100/94.25 of net asset value. On investments of $50,000 or more, the offering price is reduced.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

12  |  Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund


Statement of operations—year ended May 31, 2021
   
Investment income  
Dividends allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios (net of foreign withholding taxes of $86,729)

$ 2,465,856
Affiliated income allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

10,209
Expenses allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

(771,216)
Waivers allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

62,848
Total investment income

1,767,697
Expenses  
Management fee

473,708
Administration fees  
Class A

135,071
Class C

3,214
Administrator Class

119,669
Shareholder servicing fees  
Class A

160,725
Class C

3,823
Administrator Class

230,054
Distribution fee  
Class C

11,446
Custody and accounting fees

7,268
Professional fees

33,555
Registration fees

51,778
Shareholder report expenses

27,252
Trustees’ fees and expenses

21,080
Other fees and expenses

15,680
Total expenses

1,294,323
Less: Fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements  
Fund-level

(92,741)
Class A

(413)
Class C

(2)
Administrator Class

(156,491)
Net expenses

1,044,676
Net investment income

723,021
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments  
Net realized gains on securities transactions allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

27,737,789
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on securities transactions allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

28,940,981
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

56,678,770
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

$57,401,791
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund  |  13


Statement of changes in net assets
         
  Year ended
May 31, 2021
Year ended
May 31, 2020
Operations        
Net investment income

  $ 723,021   $ 985,336
Net realized gains on investments

  27,737,789   7,327,284
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

  28,940,981   (2,050)
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

  57,401,791   8,310,570
Distributions to shareholders from        
Net investment income and net realized gains        
Class A

  (5,170,073)   (6,060,114)
Class C

  (146,977)   (154,837)
Administrator Class

  (7,647,442)   (8,943,655)
Total distributions to shareholders

  (12,964,492)   (15,158,606)
Capital share transactions Shares   Shares  
Proceeds from shares sold        
Class A

43,959 1,047,373 34,574 724,712
Class C

8,854 180,223 1,492 27,271
Administrator Class

189,208 4,532,096 793,124 13,930,309
    5,759,692   14,682,292
Reinvestment of distributions        
Class A

220,012 5,137,750 271,522 6,024,365
Class C

7,549 146,977 8,155 153,322
Administrator Class

322,033 7,579,820 396,996 8,870,564
    12,864,547   15,048,251
Payment for shares redeemed        
Class A

(366,549) (8,702,717) (430,823) (9,283,399)
Class C

(17,006) (343,155) (10,993) (204,548)
Administrator Class

(842,396) (20,041,824) (1,241,352) (23,720,814)
    (29,087,696)   (33,208,761)
Net decrease in net assets resulting from capital share transactions

  (10,463,457)   (3,478,218)
Total increase (decrease) in net assets

  33,973,842   (10,326,254)
Net assets        
Beginning of period

  140,455,951   150,782,205
End of period

  $174,429,793   $140,455,951
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

14  |  Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class A 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$20.40 $21.36 $26.48 $29.37 $27.30
Net investment income

0.08 1 0.11 1 0.18 1 0.16 1 0.13
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

8.56 1.18 (0.55) 3.93 3.94
Total from investment operations

8.64 1.29 (0.37) 4.09 4.07
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.07) (0.17) (0.13) (0.17) (0.22)
Net realized gains

(1.92) (2.08) (4.62) (6.81) (1.78)
Total distributions to shareholders

(1.99) (2.25) (4.75) (6.98) (2.00)
Net asset value, end of period

$27.05 $20.40 $21.36 $26.48 $29.37
Total return2

44.02% 5.27% (0.57)% 14.68% 15.59%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

1.31% 1.39% 1.37% 1.38% 1.40%
Net expenses

1.25% 1.25% 1.25% 1.25% 1.25%
Net investment income

0.32% 0.52% 0.75% 0.55% 0.63%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate3

122% 81% 91% 70% 90%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$71,971 $56,387 $61,692 $69,766 $68,678
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.45%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.51%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.50%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.53%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.57%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges.
3 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund  |  15


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class C 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$17.35 $18.45 $23.58 $26.86 $25.12
Net investment loss

(0.09) 1 (0.04) 1 (0.01) 1 (0.05) 1 (0.03) 1
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

7.21 1.03 (0.50) 3.58 3.57
Total from investment operations

7.12 0.99 (0.51) 3.53 3.54
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

0.00 (0.01) 0.00 (0.00) 2 (0.02)
Net realized gains

(1.92) (2.08) (4.62) (6.81) (1.78)
Total distributions to shareholders

(1.92) (2.09) (4.62) (6.81) (1.80)
Net asset value, end of period

$22.55 $17.35 $18.45 $23.58 $26.86
Total return3

42.88% 4.53% (1.34)% 13.89% 14.71%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

2.06% 2.14% 2.11% 2.13% 2.15%
Net expenses

2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00%
Net investment loss

(0.43)% (0.23)% (0.04)% (0.21)% (0.13)%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate4

122% 81% 91% 70% 90%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$1,698 $1,317 $1,425 $2,245 $2,355
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.45%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.51%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.50%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.53%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.57%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Amount is less than $0.005.
3 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges.
4 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

16  |  Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Administrator Class 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$20.53 $21.47 $26.60 $29.46 $27.38
Net investment income

0.14 1 0.17 0.24 1 0.23 1 0.24 1
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

8.61 1.20 (0.57) 3.95 3.91
Total from investment operations

8.75 1.37 (0.33) 4.18 4.15
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.13) (0.23) (0.18) (0.23) (0.29)
Net realized gains

(1.92) (2.08) (4.62) (6.81) (1.78)
Total distributions to shareholders

(2.05) (2.31) (4.80) (7.04) (2.07)
Net asset value, end of period

$27.23 $20.53 $21.47 $26.60 $29.46
Total return

44.30% 5.59% (0.35)% 14.99% 15.86%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

1.23% 1.31% 1.29% 1.30% 1.32%
Net expenses

1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00%
Net investment income

0.57% 0.77% 1.00% 0.79% 0.87%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate2

122% 81% 91% 70% 90%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$100,760 $82,752 $87,665 $98,668 $119,893
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.45%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.51%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.50%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.53%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.57%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund  |  17


Notes to financial statements
1. ORGANIZATION
Wells Fargo Funds Trust (the "Trust"), a Delaware statutory trust organized on March 10, 1999, is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). As an investment company, the Trust follows the accounting and reporting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, Financial Services – Investment Companies. These financial statements report on the Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund (the "Fund") which is a diversified series of the Trust.
The Fund is a fund-of-funds that invests in various affiliated mutual funds (“Underlying Funds”) employing a multi-asset, multi-style investment approach designed to reduce the price and return volatility of the Fund and to provide more consistent returns. The Fund may also invest directly in securities. The Underlying Funds incur separate expenses in seeking to achieve their investment objectives. Investments in affiliated Underlying Funds may also include investments in one or more separate diversified portfolios (collectively, the “affiliated Master Portfolios”) of Wells Fargo Master Trust, a registered open-end management investment company. Each affiliated Master Portfolio directly acquires portfolio securities and the Fund acquires an indirect interest in those securities. The Fund accounts for its investments in the affiliated Master Portfolios as partnership investments and records on a daily basis its share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s income, expense and realized and unrealized gains and losses. The financial statements of the affiliated Master Portfolios are presented in separate financial statements and may be obtained free of charge by contacting Investor Services or by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov. The financial statements of the affiliated Master Portfolios are filed with the SEC under Wells Fargo Master Trust. The financial statements for all other affiliated Underlying Funds are also publicly available on the SEC website at sec.gov.
On February 23, 2021, Wells Fargo & Company announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management ("WFAM") to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. WFAM is the trade name used by the asset management businesses of Wells Fargo & Company and includes Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the investment manager to the Fund, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, both registered investment advisers providing sub-advisory services to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Fund's principal underwriter. As part of the transaction, Wells Fargo & Company will own a 9.9% equity interest and will continue to serve as an important client and distribution partner.
Consummation of the transaction will result in the automatic termination of the Fund's investment management agreement and subadvisory agreement. The Fund's Board of Trustees approved a new investment management and new subadvisory agreement and approved submitting the agreements to the Fund’s shareholders for approval at a special meeting of shareholders expected to be held on August 16, 2021. Shareholders of record of the Fund at the close of business on May 28, 2021 are entitled to vote at the meeting. If shareholders approve the new agreements, they would take effect upon the closing of the transaction. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
This shareholder report is not asking you for a proxy. A separate proxy statement with more detailed information about the transaction will be provided to Fund shareholders and should be reviewed carefully.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following significant accounting policies, which are consistently followed in the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund, are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Securities valuation
All investments are valued each business day as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4 p.m. Eastern Time), although the Fund may deviate from this calculation time under unusual or unexpected circumstances.
Investments in the affiliated Master Portfolios are valued daily based on each Fund’s proportionate share of each affiliated Master Portfolio’s net assets, which are also valued daily.
Investments which are not valued using any of the methods discussed above are valued at their fair value, as determined in good faith by the Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees has established a Valuation Committee comprised of the Trustees and has delegated to it the authority to take any actions regarding the valuation of portfolio securities that the Valuation Committee deems necessary or appropriate, including determining the fair value of portfolio securities, unless the determination has been delegated to the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee at Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC ("Funds Management"). The Board of Trustees retains the authority to make or ratify any valuation decisions

18  |  Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund


Notes to financial statements
or approve any changes to the Valuation Procedures as it deems appropriate. On a quarterly basis, the Board of Trustees receives reports on any valuation actions taken by the Valuation Committee or the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee which may include items for ratification.
Investment transactions, income and expenses
Investments in the affiliated Master Portfolios are recorded on a trade date basis. The Fund records daily its proportionate share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s income, expenses and realized and unrealized gains or losses. The Fund also accrues its own expenses.
Distributions to shareholders
Distributions to shareholders from net investment income and any net realized gains are recorded on the ex-dividend date and paid at least annually. Such distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations and may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Dividend sources are estimated at the time of declaration. The tax character of distributions is determined as of the Fund's fiscal year end. Therefore, a portion of the Fund's distributions made prior to the Fund’s fiscal year end may be categorized as a tax return of capital at year end.
Federal and other taxes
The Fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by distributing substantially all of its investment company taxable income and any net realized capital gains (after reduction for capital loss carryforwards) sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes. Accordingly, no provision for federal income taxes was required.
The Fund’s income and federal excise tax returns and all financial records supporting those returns for the prior three fiscal years are subject to examination by the federal and Delaware revenue authorities. Management has analyzed the Fund's tax positions taken on federal, state, and foreign tax returns for all open tax years and does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability.
As of May 31, 2021, the aggregate cost of all investments for federal income tax purposes was $140,519,426 and the unrealized gains (losses) consisted of:
Gross unrealized gains $40,712,378
Gross unrealized losses (6,648,894)
Net unrealized gains $34,063,484
Reclassifications are made to the Fund’s capital accounts for permanent tax differences to reflect income and gains available for distribution (or available capital loss carryforwards) under federal income tax regulations. U.S. generally accepted accounting principles require that certain components of net assets be adjusted to reflect permanent differences between financial and tax reporting. These reclassifications have no effect on net assets or net asset values per share. The primary permanent difference causing such reclassification is due to recognition of partnership income. At May 31, 2021, as a result of permanent book-to-tax differences, the following reclassification adjustments were made on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities:
Paid-in capital Total distributable
earnings
$(1,075,029) $1,075,029
Class allocations
The separate classes of shares offered by the Fund differ principally in applicable sales charges, distribution, shareholder servicing, and administration fees. Class specific expenses are charged directly to that share class. Investment income, common fund-level expenses, and realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative proportion of net assets of each class.
3. FAIR VALUATION MEASUREMENTS
At May 31, 2021, the affiliated Master Portfolios were measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient. The aggregate value of the affiliated Master Portfolios was $174,582,910. The investment objective of each affiliated Master Portfolio is as follows:

Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund  |  19


Notes to financial statements
Affiliated Master Portfolio Investment objective
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio Seeks maximum long-term total return (current income and capital appreciation), consistent with minimizing risk to principal
Wells Fargo Disciplined International Developed Markets Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Diversified Large Cap Growth Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Index Portfolio Seeks to replicate the total return of the S&P 500 Index, before fees and expenses
Wells Fargo Large Company Value Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
The affiliated Master Portfolios do not have a redemption period notice, can be redeemed daily and do not have any unfunded commitments.
4. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
Management fee
Funds Management, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company ("Wells Fargo"), is the manager of the Fund and provides advisory and fund-level administrative services under an investment management agreement. Under the investment management agreement, Funds Management is responsible for, among other services, implementing the investment objectives and strategies of the Fund, supervising the subadviser and providing fund-level administrative services in connection with the Fund’s operations. As compensation for its services under the investment management agreement, Funds Management is entitled to receive a management fee at the following annual rate based on the Fund’s average daily net assets:
Average daily net assets Management fee
First $500 million 0.300%
Next $500 million 0.280
Next $2 billion 0.260
Next $2 billion 0.240
Next $5 billion 0.230
Over $10 billion 0.220
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the management fee was equivalent to an annual rate of 0.30% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
Funds Management also serves as the adviser to each affiliated Master Portfolio and is entitled to receive a fee from each affiliated Master Portfolio for those services.
Administration fees
Under a class-level administration agreement, Funds Management provides class-level administrative services to the Fund, which includes paying fees and expenses for services provided by the transfer agent, sub-transfer agents, omnibus account servicers and record-keepers. As compensation for its services under the class-level administration agreement, Funds Management receives an annual fee which is calculated based on the average daily net assets of each class as follows:

20  |  Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund


Notes to financial statements
  Class-level
administration fee
Class A 0.21%
Class C 0.21
Administrator Class 0.13
Waivers and/or expense reimbursements
Funds Management has contractually waived and/or reimbursed management and administration fees to the extent necessary to maintain certain net operating expense ratios for the Fund. When each class of the Fund has exceeded its expense cap, Funds Management has waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses from fund-level expenses on a proportionate basis and then from class specific expenses. When only certain classes exceed their expense caps, waivers and/or reimbursements are applied against class specific expenses before fund-level expenses. Net expenses from the affiliated Master Portfolios are included in the expense caps. Funds Management has committed through September 30, 2021 to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap expenses. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. The contractual expense caps are as follows:
  Expense ratio caps
Class A 1.25%
Class C 2.00
Administrator Class 1.00
Distribution fee
The Trust has adopted a distribution plan for Class C shares of the Fund pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. A distribution fee is charged to Class C shares and paid to Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC ("Funds Distributor"), the principal underwriter, at an annual rate of 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class C shares.
In addition, Funds Distributor is entitled to receive the front-end sales charge from the purchase of Class A shares and a contingent deferred sales charge on the redemption of certain Class A shares. Funds Distributor is also entitled to receive the contingent deferred sales charges from redemptions of Class C shares. For the year ended May 31, 2021, Funds Distributor received $2,232 from the sale of Class A shares. No contingent deferred sales charges were incurred by Class A and Class C shares for the year ended May 31, 2021.
Shareholder servicing fees
The Trust has entered into contracts with one or more shareholder servicing agents, whereby Class A, Class C, and Administrator Class of the Fund are charged a fee at an annual rate of 0.25% of the average daily net assets of each respective class. A portion of these total shareholder servicing fees were paid to affiliates of Wells Fargo.
5. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS
The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing in affiliated Master Portfolios. Purchases and sales related to these investments have been calculated by aggregating the results of multiplying the Fund's ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. Purchases and sales of investments, excluding U.S. government obligations (if any) and short-term securities, for the year ended May 31, 2021 were $178,668,218 and $194,031,426, respectively.
6. BANK BORROWINGS
The Trust (excluding the money market funds), Wells Fargo Master Trust and Wells Fargo Variable Trust are parties to a $350,000,000 revolving credit agreement whereby the Fund is permitted to use bank borrowings for temporary or emergency purposes, such as to fund shareholder redemption requests. Interest under the credit agreement is charged to the Fund based on a borrowing rate equal to the higher of the Federal Funds rate in effect on that day plus 1.25% or the overnight LIBOR rate in effect on that day plus 1.25%. In addition, an annual commitment fee equal to 0.25% of the unused balance is allocated to each participating fund.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, there were no borrowings by the Fund under the agreement.

Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund  |  21


Notes to financial statements
7. DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS
The tax character of distributions paid during the years ended May 31, 2021 and May 31, 2020 were as follows:
  Year ended May 31
  2021 2020
Ordinary income $4,064,530 $ 1,674,722
Long-term capital gain 8,899,962 13,483,884
As of May 31, 2021, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Undistributed
ordinary
income
Undistributed
long-term
gain
Unrealized
gains
$9,322,916 $9,710,193 $34,063,484
8. INDEMNIFICATION
Under the Fund's organizational documents, the officers and Trustees have been granted certain indemnification rights against certain liabilities that may arise out of performance of their duties to the Fund. The Fund has entered into a separate agreement with each Trustee that converts indemnification rights currently existing under the Fund’s organizational documents into contractual rights that cannot be changed in the future without the consent of the Trustee. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with service providers that contain a variety of indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent on future claims that may be made against the Fund and, therefore, cannot be estimated.
9. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
In August 2018, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 updates the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Management has adopted this guidance which did not have a material impact on the financial statements.
10. CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization announced that it had made the assessment that coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) is a pandemic. The impacts of COVID-19 are affecting the entire global economy, individual companies and investment products, the funds, and the market in general. There is significant uncertainty around the extent and duration of business disruptions related to COVID-19 and the impacts may last for an extended period of time. COVID-19 has led to significant uncertainty and volatility in the financial markets.
11. REORGANIZATION
At a meeting held on May 17-19, 2021, the Board of Trustees of the Fund approved the merger of the Fund into Wells Fargo Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund. An Information prospectus/information statement is expected to be mailed to shareholders in July 2021. The merger does not require shareholder approval and is scheduled to take place on or about September 17, 2021.
12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
At a meeting held July 15, 2021, the Board of Trustees of the Wells Fargo Funds approved a change in the Fund's name to remove “Wells Fargo” from the Fund's name and replace with “Allspring”. The change is expected to go into effect on October 11, 2021.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) announced that it will be changing its company name to Allspring Global Investments upon the closing of the previously announced sale transaction of WFAM by Wells Fargo & Company to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. The new corporate name is expected to go into effect on the closing date of the transaction, which is anticipated to occur in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.

22  |  Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund


Notes to financial statements
Following the closing of the transaction, Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the Fund's investment manager, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, each sub-advisers to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Fund's principal underwriter, will each be rebranded as Allspring.

Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund  |  23


Report of independent registered public accounting firm
To the Shareholders of the Fund and Board of Trustees
Wells Fargo Funds Trust:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund (the Fund), one of the funds constituting Wells Fargo Funds Trust, including the portfolio of investments, as of May 31, 2021, the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the financial statements) and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of May 31, 2021, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Fund in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and financial highlights, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. Such procedures also included confirmation of securities owned as of May 31, 2021, by correspondence with the transfer agent. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and financial highlights. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have not been able to determine the specific year that we began serving as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies; however, we are aware that we have served as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies since at least 1955.
Boston, Massachusetts
July 28, 2021

24  |  Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund


Other information (unaudited)
TAX INFORMATION
For corporate shareholders, pursuant to Section 854 of the Internal Revenue Code, 19% of ordinary income dividends qualify for the corporate dividends-received deduction for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 852 of the Internal Revenue Code, $8,899,962 was designated as a 20% rate gain distribution for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 854 of the Internal Revenue Code, $746,956 of income dividends paid during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 has been designated as qualified dividend income (QDI).
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, $3,366,193 has been designated as short-term capital gain dividends for nonresident alien shareholders pursuant to Section 871 of the Internal Revenue Code.
PROXY VOTING INFORMATION
A description of the policies and procedures used to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-222-8222, visiting our website at wfam.com, or visiting the SEC website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the proxies related to portfolio securities were voted during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the website at wfam.com or by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS INFORMATION
The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year as an exhibit to its reports on Form N-PORT. Shareholders may view the filed Form N-PORT by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov.

Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund  |  25


Other information (unaudited)
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS
Each of the Trustees and Officers listed in the table below acts in identical capacities for each fund in the Wells Fargo family of funds, which consists of 139 mutual funds comprising the Wells Fargo Funds Trust, Wells Fargo Variable Trust, Wells Fargo Master Trust and four closed-end funds (collectively the “Fund Complex”). This table should be read in conjunction with the Prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information1. The mailing address of each Trustee and Officer is 525 Market Street, 12th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105. Each Trustee and Officer serves an indefinite term, however, each Trustee serves such term until reaching the mandatory retirement age established by the Trustees.
Independent Trustees
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service*
Principal occupations during past five years or longer Current other
public company or
investment
company
directorships
William R. Ebsworth
(Born 1957)
Trustee,
since 2015
Retired. From 1984 to 2013, equities analyst, portfolio manager, research director and chief investment officer at Fidelity Management and Research Company in Boston, Tokyo, and Hong Kong, and retired in 2013 as Chief Investment Officer of Fidelity Strategic Advisers, Inc. where he led a team of investment professionals managing client assets. Prior thereto, Board member of Hong Kong Securities Clearing Co., Hong Kong Options Clearing Corp., the Thailand International Fund, Ltd., Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company, and Empire Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company. Audit Committee Chair and Investment Committee Chair of the Vincent Memorial Hospital Endowment (non-profit organization). Mr. Ebsworth is a CFA® charterholder. N/A
Jane A. Freeman
(Born 1953)
Trustee,
since 2015;
Chair Liaison,
since 2018
Retired. From 2012 to 2014 and 1999 to 2008, Chief Financial Officer of Scientific Learning Corporation. From 2008 to 2012, Ms. Freeman provided consulting services related to strategic business projects. Prior to 1999, Portfolio Manager at Rockefeller & Co. and Scudder, Stevens & Clark. Board member of the Harding Loevner Funds from 1996 to 2014, serving as both Lead Independent Director and chair of the Audit Committee. Board member of the Russell Exchange Traded Funds Trust from 2011 to 2012 and the chair of the Audit Committee. Ms. Freeman is also an inactive Chartered Financial Analyst. N/A
Isaiah Harris, Jr.
(Born 1952)
Trustee,
since 2009; Audit
Committee
Chair,
since 2019
Retired. Chairman of the Board of CIGNA Corporation since 2009, and Director since 2005. From 2003 to 2011, Director of Deluxe Corporation. Prior thereto, President and CEO of BellSouth Advertising and Publishing Corp. from 2005 to 2007, President and CEO of BellSouth Enterprises from 2004 to 2005 and President of BellSouth Consumer Services from 2000 to 2003. Emeritus member of the Iowa State University Foundation Board of Governors. Emeritus Member of the Advisory Board of Iowa State University School of Business. Advisory Board Member, Palm Harbor Academy (private school). Mr. Harris is a certified public accountant (inactive status). CIGNA Corporation
Judith M. Johnson
(Born 1949)
Trustee,
since 2008
Retired. Prior thereto, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund from 1996 to 2008. Ms. Johnson is an attorney, certified public accountant and a certified managerial accountant. N/A
David F. Larcker
(Born 1950)
Trustee,
since 2009
James Irvin Miller Professor of Accounting at the Graduate School of Business (Emeritus), Stanford University, Director of the Corporate Governance Research Initiative and Senior Faculty of The Rock Center for Corporate Governance since 2006. From 2005 to 2008, Professor of Accounting at the Graduate School of Business, Stanford University. Prior thereto, Ernst & Young Professor of Accounting at The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania from 1985 to 2005. N/A

26  |  Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund


Other information (unaudited)
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service*
Principal occupations during past five years or longer Current other
public company or
investment
company
directorships
Olivia S. Mitchell
(Born 1953)
Trustee,
since 2006;
Nominating and
Governance
Committee Chair,
since 2018
International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans Professor, Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania since 1993. Director of Wharton’s Pension Research Council and Boettner Center on Pensions & Retirement Research, and Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. Previously, Cornell University Professor from 1978 to 1993. N/A
Timothy J. Penny
(Born 1951)
Trustee,
since 1996;
Chair,
since 2018
President and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Minnesota Initiative Foundation, a non-profit organization, since 2007. Member of the Board of Trustees of NorthStar Education Finance, Inc., a non-profit organization, since 2007. N/A
James G. Polisson
(Born 1959)
Trustee,
since 2018
Retired. Chief Marketing Officer, Source (ETF) UK Services, Ltd, from 2015 to 2017. From 2012 to 2015, Principal of The Polisson Group, LLC, a management consulting, corporate advisory and principal investing company. Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director at Russell Investments, Global Exchange Traded Funds from 2010 to 2012. Managing Director of Barclays Global Investors from 1998 to 2010 and Global Chief Marketing Officer for iShares and Barclays Global Investors from 2000 to 2010. Trustee of the San Francisco Mechanics’ Institute, a non-profit organization, from 2013 to 2015. Board member of the Russell Exchange Traded Fund Trust from 2011 to 2012. Director of Barclays Global Investors Holdings Deutschland GmbH from 2006 to 2009. Mr. Polisson is an attorney and has a retired status with the Massachusetts and District of Columbia Bar Associations. N/A
Pamela Wheelock
(Born 1959)
Trustee,
since January
2020; previously
Trustee from
January 2018 to
July 2019
Board member of the Destination Medical Center Economic Development Agency, Rochester, Minnesota since 2019. Interim President of the McKnight Foundation from January to September 2020. Acting Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Human Services, July 2019 through September 2019. Human Services Manager (part-time), Minnesota Department of Human Services, October 2019 through December 2019. Chief Operating Officer, Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity from 2017 to 2019. Vice President of University Services, University of Minnesota from 2012 to 2016. Prior thereto, on the Board of Directors, Governance Committee and Finance Committee for the Minnesota Philanthropy Partners (Saint Paul Foundation) from 2012 to 2018, Interim Chief Executive Officer of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota from 2011 to 2012, Chairman of the Board from 2009 to 2012 and Board Director from 2003 to 2015. Vice President, Leadership and Community Engagement, Bush Foundation, Saint Paul, Minnesota (a private foundation) from 2009 to 2011. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Minnesota Sports and Entertainment from 2004 to 2009 and Senior Vice President from 2002 to 2004. Executive Vice President of the Minnesota Wild Foundation from 2004 to 2008. Commissioner of Finance, State of Minnesota, from 1999 to 2002. Currently Board Chair of the Minnesota Wild Foundation since 2010. N/A
*  Length of service dates reflect the Trustee’s commencement of service with the Trust’s predecessor entities, where applicable.

Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund  |  27


Other information (unaudited)
Officers
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service
Principal occupations during past five years or longer
Andrew Owen
(Born 1960)
President,
since 2017
Executive Vice President of Wells Fargo & Company and Head of Affiliated Managers, Wells Fargo Asset Management, since 2014. In addition, Mr. Owen is currently President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC since 2017. Prior thereto, Executive Vice President responsible for marketing, investments and product development for Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, from 2009 to 2014.
Jeremy DePalma
(Born 1974)
Treasurer,
since 2012
(for certain funds in
the Fund Complex);
since 2021 (for
the remaining funds in the
Fund Complex)
Senior Vice President of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC since 2009. Senior Vice President of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC from 2008 to 2010 and head of the Fund Reporting and Control Team within Fund Administration from 2005 to 2010.
Michelle Rhee
(Born 1966)
Chief Legal Officer,
since 2019
Secretary of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC and Chief Legal Counsel of Wells Fargo Asset Management since 2018. Deputy General Counsel of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. since 2020 and Assistant General Counsel of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. from 2018 to 2020. Associate General Counsel and Managing Director of Bank of America Corporation from 2004 to 2018.
Catherine Kennedy
(Born 1969)
Secretary,
since 2019
Vice President of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC and Senior Counsel of the Wells Fargo Legal Department since 2010. Vice President and Senior Counsel of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC from 1998 to 2010.
Michael H. Whitaker
(Born 1967)
Chief Compliance Officer,
since 2016
Chief Compliance Officer of Wells Fargo Asset Management since 2016. Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer for Fidelity Investments from 2007 to 2016.
1  The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about the Trustees and is available, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-222-8222 or by visiting the website at wfam.com.

28  |  Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund


Other information (unaudited)
LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
In accordance with Rule 22e-4 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Liquidity Rule”), Wells Fargo Funds Trust (the “Trust”) has adopted and implemented a liquidity risk management program (the “Program”) on behalf of each of its series, including the Fund, which is reasonably designed to assess and manage the Fund's liquidity risk. “Liquidity risk” is defined under the Liquidity Rule as the risk that the Fund is unable to meet redemption requests without significantly diluting remaining investors’ interests in the Fund. The Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”) previously approved the designation of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”), the Fund's investment manager, as the administrator of the Program, and Funds Management has established a Liquidity Risk Management Council (the "Council") composed of personnel from multiple departments within Funds Management and its affiliates to assist Funds Management in the implementation and on-going administration of the Program.
The Program is comprised of various components designed to support the assessment and/or management of liquidity risk, including: (1) the periodic assessment (no less frequently than annually) of certain factors that influence the Fund's liquidity risk; (2) the periodic classification (no less frequently than monthly) of the Fund's investments into one of four liquidity categories that reflect an estimate of their liquidity under current market conditions; (3) a 15% limit on the acquisition of “illiquid investments” (as defined under the Liquidity Rule); (4) to the extent the Fund does not invest primarily in “highly liquid investments” (as defined under the Liquidity Rule), the determination of a minimum percentage of the Fund's assets that generally will be invested in highly liquid investments (an “HLIM”); (5) if the Fund has established an HLIM, the periodic review (no less frequently than annually) of the HLIM and the adoption of policies and procedures for responding to a shortfall of the Fund's “highly liquid investments” below its HLIM; and (6) periodic reporting to the Board.
At a meeting of the Board held on May 17-19, 2021, the Board received and reviewed a written report (the “Report”) from Funds Management that addressed the operation of the Program and assessed its adequacy and effectiveness for the period from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 (the “Reporting Period”). Among other things, the Report discussed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on liquidity and management of liquidity risk during the Reporting Period, including during the stressed market conditions caused by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. No significant liquidity events impacting the Fund were noted in the Report. As applicable to the Fund, there were no material changes to the Program during the Reporting Period.
Funds Management concluded in the Report that the Program is operating effectively to assess and manage the Fund’s liquidity risk, and that the Program has been and continues to be adequately and effectively implemented to monitor and, as applicable, respond to the Fund’s liquidity developments.
There can be no assurance that the Program will achieve its objectives under all circumstances in the future. Please refer to the Fund’s prospectus for more information regarding the Fund’s exposure to liquidity risk and other risks to which an investment in the Fund may be subject.

Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund  |  29


Board considerations (unaudited)
BOARD CONSIDERATION OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AND SUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENTS:
Board Considerations – Current Agreements
Under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Wells Fargo Funds Trust (the “Trust”) must determine annually whether to approve the continuation of the Trust’s investment management agreement. In this regard, at a Board meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Meeting”), the Board, all the members of which have no direct or indirect interest in the investment management agreement and are not “interested persons” of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), reviewed and approved for Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund (the “Fund”) an investment management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”). The Fund is a fund-of-funds that invests all of its assets in multiple portfolios of Wells Fargo Master Trust (the “Master Portfolios”).
The Board noted that Wells Fargo & Company recently announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”), which includes Funds Management, to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. and/or their affiliates (the “Transaction”). The Board further noted that the Transaction would result in a change-of-control of Funds Management, which would be considered to be an assignment that would result in the termination of the Management Agreement. In light of the Transaction, the Board separately considered for approval a new investment management agreement with Funds Management (the “New Agreement”) that would replace the Management Agreement upon consummation of the Transaction, subject to approval of the New Agreement by the Fund’s shareholders. The Board also considered for approval an interim agreement to go into effect in the event shareholders do not approve the New Agreement before the Transaction is completed. The interim agreement would allow the Manager to continue providing services to the Fund while the Fund continues to seek shareholder approval of the New Agreement. The Board noted that the terms of the interim agreement would be identical to those of the current Management Agreement, except for the term and certain escrow provisions.
At the Meeting, the Board considered the factors and reached the conclusions described below relating to the selection of Funds Management and the approval the Management Agreement. Prior to the Meeting, including at Board meetings held in April and May 2021, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with representatives of Funds Management about these matters. Also, the Board has adopted a team-based approach, with each team consisting of a sub-set of Trustees, to assist the full Board in the discharge of its duties in reviewing investment performance and other matters throughout the year. The Independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Management Agreement by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately.
In providing information to the Board, Funds Management was guided by a detailed set of requests for information submitted to it by independent legal counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees at the start of the Board’s annual contract renewal process earlier in 2021. In considering and approving the Management Agreement, the Trustees considered the information they believed relevant, including but not limited to the information discussed below. The Board considered not only the specific information presented in connection with the Meeting, but also the knowledge gained over time through interaction with Funds Management about various topics. In this regard, the Board reviewed reports of Funds Management at each of its quarterly meetings, which included, among other things, portfolio reviews and investment performance reports. In addition, the Board and the teams mentioned above confer with portfolio managers at various times throughout the year. The Board did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each individual Trustee may have attributed different weights to various factors.
After its deliberations, the Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the Management Agreement was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Management Agreement for a one-year term. The Board considered the approval of the Management Agreement for the Fund as part of its consideration of agreements for funds across the complex, but its approval was made on a fund-by-fund basis. The following summarizes a number of important, but not necessarily all, factors considered by the Board in support of its approval.
Nature, extent and quality of services
The Board received and considered various information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund by Funds Management under the Management Agreement. This information included a description of the investment advisory services and Fund-level administrative services covered by the Management Agreement, as well as, among other things, a summary of the background and experience of senior management of WFAM, of which Funds Management is a part, and a summary of investments made in the business of WFAM. The Board also received a description of Funds Management’s business continuity plan, including a summary of the performance of such plan and any changes thereto during the COVID-19 pandemic, and of its approach to data privacy and cybersecurity. The Board also received and reviewed information about Funds

30  |  Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
Management’s role as administrator of the Fund’s liquidity risk management program, Funds Management’s approach to risk management, and Funds Management’s intermediary and vendor oversight program.
The Board also considered the qualifications, background, tenure and responsibilities of each of the portfolio managers primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the Fund. The Board evaluated the ability of Funds Management to attract and retain qualified investment professionals, including research, advisory and supervisory personnel.
The Board further considered the compliance programs and compliance records of Funds Management. In addition, the Board took into account the full range of services provided to the Fund by Funds Management and its affiliates. The Board also considered information about retention and back-up arrangements that have been put into place with respect to key personnel of WFAM in connection with the anticipated Transaction, noting that WFAM provided assurances that the announcement and eventual culmination of the Transaction is not expected to result in any diminution in the nature or quality of services provided to the Fund.
Fund investment performance and expenses
The Board considered the investment performance results for the Fund over various time periods ended December 31, 2020. The Board considered these results in comparison to the investment performance of funds in a universe that was determined by Broadridge Inc. (“Broadridge”) to be similar to the Fund (the “Universe”), and in comparison to the Fund’s benchmark index and to other comparative data. Broadridge is an independent provider of investment company data. The Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the performance Universe. The Board noted that the investment performance of the Fund (Administrator Class) was higher than the average investment performance of the Universe for all periods under review. The Board also noted that the investment performance of the Fund was lower than its benchmark index, the Diversified Equity Blended Index, for all periods under review. The Board received information concerning, and discussed factors contributing to, the underperformance of the Fund relative to its benchmark index for the periods under review. The Board took note of the explanations for the relative underperformance during these periods, including with respect to investment decisions and market factors that affected the Fund’s investment performance. The Board also took note of the Fund’s outperformance relative to the Universe over the same periods.
The Board also received and considered information regarding the Fund’s net operating expense ratios, which include fees and expenses of the Master Portfolios, and their various components, including actual management fees assessed at the Fund and Master Portfolio levels, custodian and other non-management fees, and Rule 12b-1 and non-Rule 12b-1 shareholder service fees. The Board considered these ratios in comparison to the median ratios of funds in class-specific expense groups that were determined by Broadridge to be similar to the Fund (the “Groups”). The Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the expense Groups and an explanation of how funds comprising expense groups and their expense ratios may vary from year-to-year. Based on the Broadridge reports, the Board noted that the net operating expense ratios of the Fund were in range of the median net operating expense ratios of the expense Groups for the Administrator Class, and that the net operating expense ratios of the Fund were higher than the median net operating expense ratios of the expense Groups for the Class A shares.
The Board took into account the Fund’s investment performance and expense information provided to it among the factors considered in deciding to re-approve the Management Agreement.
Investment management fee rates
The Board noted that the Fund is a fund-of-funds that invests in multiple Master Portfolios and therefore Funds Management is entitled to receive an annual fee at a certain annual rate based on the Fund’s average daily net assets for providing investment advisory services to the Fund, including allocating the Fund’s assets among the various Master Portfolios. The Board reviewed and considered the contractual fee rates payable by the Fund to Funds Management under the Management Agreement, as well as the contractual fee rates payable by the Fund to Funds Management for class-level administrative services under a Class-Level Administration Agreement, which include, among other things, class-level transfer agency and sub-transfer agency costs (collectively, the “Management Rates”).
Among other information reviewed by the Board was a comparison of the Fund’s Management Rates with the average contractual investment management fee rates of funds in the expense Groups at a common asset level as well as transfer agency costs of the funds in the expense Groups. The Board noted that the Management Rates of the Fund were lower than the sum of these average rates for the Fund’s expense Groups for all share classes.
The Board also received and considered information about the nature and extent of services offered and fee rates charged by Funds Management to other types of clients with investment strategies similar to those of the Fund. In this regard, the Board received information about the significantly greater scope of services, and compliance, reporting and other legal burdens and risks

Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund  |  31


Board considerations (unaudited)
of managing proprietary mutual funds compared with those associated with managing assets of other types of clients, including third-party sub-advised fund clients and non-mutual fund clients such as institutional separate accounts.
Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Board determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the Management Agreement was reasonable.
Profitability
The Board received and considered information concerning the profitability of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo & Co. (“Wells Fargo”) from providing services to the fund family as a whole.
Funds Management reported on the methodologies and estimates used in calculating profitability, including a description of the methodology used to allocate certain expenses. Among other things, the Board noted that the levels of profitability reported on a fund-by-fund basis varied widely, depending on factors such as the size, type and age of fund.
Based on its review, the Board did not deem the profits reported by Funds Management, WFAM or Wells Fargo from services provided to the Fund to be at a level that would prevent it from approving the continuation of the Management Agreement.
Economies of scale
The Board received and considered information about the potential for Funds Management to experience economies of scale in the provision of management services to the Fund, the difficulties of calculating economies of scale at an individual fund level, and the extent to which potential scale benefits are shared with Fund shareholders. The Board noted the existence of breakpoints in the Fund’s management fee structure, which operate generally to reduce the Fund’s expense ratios as the Fund grows in size, and the size of the Fund in relation to such breakpoints. The Board considered that in addition to management fee breakpoints, Funds Management shares potential economies of scale from its management business in a variety of ways, including through fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangements, competitive management fee rates set at the outset without regard to breakpoints, and investments in the business intended to enhance services available to shareholders.
The Board concluded that Funds Management’s arrangements with respect to the Fund, including contractual breakpoints, constituted a reasonable approach to sharing potential economies of scale with the Fund and its shareholders.
Other benefits to Funds Management
The Board received and considered information regarding potential “fall-out” or ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates as a result of their relationships with the Fund. Ancillary benefits could include, among others, benefits directly attributable to other relationships with the Fund and benefits potentially derived from an increase in Funds Management’s business as a result of their relationships with the Fund. The Board noted that various affiliates of Funds Management may receive distribution-related fees, shareholder servicing payments and sub-transfer agency fees in respect of shares sold or held through them and services provided.
The Board also reviewed information about fees earned by Funds Management and its affiliates from managing a private investment vehicle for the fund family’s securities lending collateral, and commissions earned by an affiliated broker from portfolio transactions.
Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Board did not find that any ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates were unreasonable.
Conclusion
At the Meeting, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the Management Agreement was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Management Agreement for a one-year term.

32  |  Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board Considerations – New Agreements
Overview of the Board evaluation process
At a meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Board Meeting”), the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Wells Fargo Funds Trust (the “Trust”, and the series identified below, the “Funds”) approved the continuation of each Fund’s current Investment Management Agreement (the “Current Investment Management Agreement”) and the current Sub-Advisory Agreements (the “Current Sub-Advisory Agreements”, and collectively, the “Current Agreements”).
Wells Fargo C&B Mid Cap Value Fund
Wells Fargo California Limited-Term Tax-Free Fund
Wells Fargo California Tax-Free Fund
Wells Fargo Classic Value Fund
Wells Fargo Common Stock Fund
Wells Fargo Disciplined Small Cap Fund
Wells Fargo Disciplined U.S. Core Fund
Wells Fargo Discovery Fund
Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund
Wells Fargo Endeavor Select Fund
Wells Fargo Enterprise Fund
Wells Fargo Fundamental Small Cap Growth Fund
Wells Fargo Growth Fund
Wells Fargo High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
Wells Fargo Intermediate Tax/AMT-Free Fund
Wells Fargo Large Cap Core Fund
Wells Fargo Large Cap Growth Fund
Wells Fargo Large Company Value Fund
Wells Fargo Minnesota Tax-Free Fund
Wells Fargo Municipal Bond Fund
Wells Fargo Omega Growth Fund
Wells Fargo Opportunity Fund
Wells Fargo Pennsylvania Tax-Free Fund
Wells Fargo Premier Large Company Growth Fund
Wells Fargo Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund
Wells Fargo Small Cap Fund
Wells Fargo Special Mid Cap Value Fund
Wells Fargo Special Small Cap Value Fund
Wells Fargo Strategic Municipal Bond Fund
Wells Fargo Ultra Short-Term Municipal Income Fund
Each Trustee on the Board is not an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”)) of the Funds (collectively, the “Independent Trustees”). The process followed by the Board in considering and approving the continuation of the Current Agreements is referred to herein as the “2021 Annual Approval Process.”
As noted above, the closing of the sale of Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”) to a holding company (“NewCo”) affiliated with private funds of GTCR LLC (“GTCR”) and of Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. (“Reverence Capital”, and such transaction, the “Transaction”) will result in a change of control of Wells Fargo Funds Management LLC (“Funds Management”) and Wells Capital Management Incorporated (“Wells Capital”, and together with Funds Management, the “Advisers”), which will be considered to be an “assignment” of each Fund’s Current Agreements under the 1940 Act that will result in the automatic termination of each Fund’s Current Agreements. In light of the expected termination of each Fund’s Current Agreements upon the closing, at the Board Meeting the Board also considered and approved the New Agreements, which are: (i) a new Investment Management Agreement (the “New Investment Management Agreement”) between the Trust, on behalf of each Fund, and Funds Management; (ii) a new Sub-Advisory Agreement (the “New Wells Capital Sub-Advisory Agreement”) among the Trust, Funds Management and Wells Capital with respect to each Fund other than C& B Mid Cap Value Fund and Diversified Equity Fund; and (iii) a new Sub-Advisory Agreement (the “New C&B Sub-Advisory Agreement”, and collectively, the “New Agreements”) among the Trust, with respect to the C&B Mid Cap Value Fund, Funds Management and Cooke & Bieler, L.P. (“C&B”, and together with Wells Capital, the “Sub-Advisers”), each of which is intended to go into effect upon the closing. The process followed by the Board in reviewing and approving the New Agreements is referred to herein as the “New Agreement Approval Process.”

Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund  |  33


Board considerations (unaudited)
At a series of meetings held in April and May 2021 (collectively, “April and May 2021 Meetings”) and at the Board Meeting, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital about the New Agreements and related matters. The Board reviewed and discussed information furnished by Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital that the Board considered reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the New Agreements and the services to be provided. At these meetings, senior representatives from Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital made presentations to, and responded to questions from, the Board.
In providing information to the Board in connection with the 2021 annual approval process (the “2021 Annual Approval Process”) and the New Agreement Approval Process, Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital (as applicable) were guided by requests for information submitted by independent legal counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. In considering and approving the New Agreements, the Trustees considered the information they believed relevant, including but not limited to the information discussed herein. The Board considered not only the specific information presented in connection with the April and May 2021 Meetings as well as the Board Meeting, but also the knowledge gained over time through interaction with Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers about various topics. In this regard, the Board reviews reports of Funds Management at each of its regular Board meetings, which includes, among other things, portfolio reviews and investment performance reports. In addition, the Board confers with portfolio managers at various times throughout the year. The Board was assisted in its evaluation of the New Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom the Independent Trustees received separate legal advice and with whom the Independent Trustees met separately. The Board did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each individual Trustee may have attributed different weights to various factors.
Among other information considered by the Board in connection with the Transaction was:
■  Information regarding the Transaction: information about the structure, financing sources and material terms and conditions of the Transaction, including the expected impact on the businesses conducted by the Advisers and by Wells Fargo Funds Distributor LLC, as the distributor of Fund shares.
■  Information regarding NewCo, GTCR and Reverence Capital: (i) information about NewCo, including information about its expected financial condition and access to capital, and senior leadership team; (ii) the experience of senior management at GTCR and Reverence Capital in acquiring portfolio companies; (iii) the plan to operationalize NewCo, including the transition of necessary infrastructure services through a transition services agreement with Wells Fargo under which Wells Fargo will continue to provide NewCo with certain services for a specified period of time after the closing; and (iv) information regarding regulatory matters, compliance, and risk management functions at NewCo, including resources to be dedicated thereto.
■  Impact of the Transaction on WFAM and Service Providers: (i) information regarding any changes to personnel and/or other resources of the Advisers as a result of the Transaction, including assurances regarding comparable and competitive compensation arrangements to attract and retain highly qualified personnel; and (ii) information about the organizational and operating structure with respect to NewCo, the Advisers and the Funds.
■  Impact of the Transaction on the Funds and their Shareholders: (i) information regarding anticipated benefits to the Funds as a result of the Transaction; (ii) a commitment that the Funds would not bear any expenses, directly or indirectly, in connection with the Transaction; (iii) confirmation that the Advisers intend to continue to manage the Funds in a manner consistent with each Fund’s current investment objectives and principal investments strategies; and (iv) a commitment that neither NewCo nor WFAM will take any steps that would impose any “unfair burden” (as that term is used in section 15(f)(1)(B) of the 1940 Act) on the Funds as a result of the Transaction.
With respect to the New Agreements, the Board considered: (i) a representation that, after the closing, all of the Funds will continue to be managed and advised by their current Advisers and for C&B Mid Cap Value Fund, C&B, and that the same portfolio managers of the Sub-Advisers are expected to continue to manage the Funds after the Transaction; (ii) information regarding the terms of the New Agreements, including changes as compared to the Current Agreements; (iii) information confirming that the fee rates payable under the New Agreements will not increase as a result of the Transaction as compared to the rates under the Current Agreements; and (iv) assurances that the Transaction is not expected to cause any diminution with respect to the nature, extent and quality of any of the services currently provided to the Funds by the Advisers as a result of the Transaction.
In addition to considering information furnished specifically to evaluate the impact of the Transaction on the Funds and their respective shareholders in connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board considered information furnished at prior meetings of the Board and its committees, including detailed information provided in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process. In this regard, in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board received information about complex-wide and individual Fund performance, fees and expenses, including: (i) a report from an independent data provider

34  |  Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
comparing the investment performance of each Fund to the investment performance of comparable funds and benchmark indices, over various time periods; (ii) a report from an independent data provider comparing each Fund’s total expense ratio (and its components) to those of comparable funds; (iii) comparative information concerning the fees charged and services provided by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to each Fund in managing other accounts (which may include other mutual funds, collective investment funds and institutional accounts), if any, that employ investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing such Fund(s); and (iv) profitability analyses of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo from providing services to the fund family as a whole.
After its deliberations, the Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the New Agreements is reasonable, approved the New Agreements for a two-year term, and voted to recommend that Fund shareholders approve the New Agreements. The Board considered the approval of the New Agreements as part of its consideration of agreements for funds across the complex, but its approvals were made on a fund-by-fund basis. The following summarizes a number of important, but not necessarily all, factors considered by the Board in support of its approvals.
Nature, extent and quality of services
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board received and considered various information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the Advisory Agreements. This information included a description of the investment advisory services and Fund-level administrative services covered by the Current Management Agreement, as well as, among other things, a summary of the background and experience of senior management of WFAM, of which Funds Management and Wells Capital are a part, and a summary of investments made in the business of WFAM. The Board also received a description of Funds Management’s and the Sub-Advisers’ business continuity plans, including a summary of the performance of such plans and any changes thereto during the COVID-19 pandemic, and of their approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity. The Board also received and reviewed information about Funds Management’s role as administrator of the Funds’ liquidity risk management program, Funds Management’s approach to risk management, and Funds Management’s intermediary and vendor oversight program.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board also considered the qualifications, background, tenure and responsibilities of each of the portfolio managers primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the Funds. The Board evaluated the ability of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to attract and retain qualified investment professionals, including research, advisory and supervisory personnel.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board further considered the compliance programs and compliance records of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers. In addition, the Board took into account the full range of services provided to the Fund by Funds Management and its affiliates.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board considered, among other information, the structure of the Transaction and expected impact, if any, of the Transaction on the operations, facilities, organization and personnel of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers. The Board received assurances from Funds Management that each Fund will continue to be advised by its current Sub-Adviser after the closing, and that the same individual portfolio managers are expected to continue to manage the Funds after the closing. With respect to the recruitment and retention of key personnel, the Board noted information from GTCR, Reverence Capital and the Advisers regarding the potential benefits for employees of joining NewCo. The Board recognized that the personnel who had been extended offers may not accept such offers and personnel changes may occur in the future in the ordinary course.
In addition, the Board considered information regarding the infrastructure, operational capabilities and support staff in place to assist in the portfolio management and operations of the Funds, including the provision of administrative services, and the anticipated impact of the Transaction on such matters. The Board also considered the business-related and other risks to which the Advisers may be subject in managing the Funds and in connection with the Transaction. The Board also considered the transition and integration plans as a result of the change in ownership of the Advisers from Wells Fargo to NewCo. The Board considered the resources and infrastructure that NewCo intends to devote to its compliance program to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations, as well as its risk management program and cybersecurity program. The Board also took into account assurances received from the Advisers, GTCR and Reverence Capital that the Transaction is not expected to cause any diminution in the nature, extent and quality of services provided by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to the Funds and their shareholders.
Fund investment performance and expenses
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board considered the investment performance results for each Fund over various time periods ended December 31, 2020. The Board considered these results in comparison to the investment performance of funds in a universe that was determined by Broadridge Inc. (“Broadridge”) to be similar to each Fund (the

Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund  |  35


Board considerations (unaudited)
“Universe”), and in comparison to each Fund’s benchmark index and to other comparative data. Broadridge is an independent provider of investment company data. The Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the performance Universe. Where applicable, the Board received information concerning, and discussed factors contributing to, underperformance of Funds relative to the Universe and benchmark for any underperformance periods.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board also received and considered information regarding each Fund’s net operating expense ratios and their various components, including actual management fees, custodian and other non-management fees, and Rule 12b-1 and non-Rule 12b-1 shareholder service fees. The Board considered these ratios in comparison to the median ratios of funds in class-specific expense groups that were determined by Broadridge to be similar to the Fund (the “Groups”). The Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the expense Groups and an explanation of how funds comprising expense groups and their expense ratios may vary from year-to-year.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board received a commitment that WFAM will maintain fee and expense commitments for at least two years after the closing. The Board took into account each Fund’s investment performance and expense information among the factors considered in deciding to approve the New Agreements.
Investment management and sub-advisory fee rates
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board reviewed and considered the contractual fee rates payable by each Fund to Funds Management under the Current Management Agreement, as well as the contractual fee rates payable by each Fund to Funds Management for class-level administrative services under a Class-Level Administration Agreement, which include, among other things, class-level transfer agency and sub-transfer agency costs (collectively, the “Management Rates”). The Board also reviewed and considered the contractual investment sub-advisory fee rates that are payable by Funds Management to each of the Sub-Advisers under the Current Sub-Advisory Agreements for investment sub-advisory services (the “Sub-Advisory Fee Rates”).
Among other information reviewed by the Board in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, was a comparison of each Fund’s Management Rates with the average contractual investment management fee rates of funds in the expense Groups at a common asset level as well as transfer agency costs of the funds in the expense Groups.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board also received and considered information about the portion of the total management fee that was retained by Funds Management after payment of the Sub-Advisory Fee Rates. In assessing the reasonableness of this amount, the Board received and evaluated information about the nature and extent of responsibilities retained and risks assumed by Funds Management and not delegated to or assumed by the Sub-Advisers, and about Funds Management’s on-going oversight services. With respect to C&B, the Board also considered this amount in comparison to the median amount retained by advisers to funds in a sub-advised expense universe that was determined by Broadridge to be similar to the Specialized Technology Fund. In this regard, the Board noted the small size of the sub-advised expense universe. The Board also considered that the sub-advisory fees paid to C&B had been negotiated by Funds Management on an arm’s length basis. Given the affiliation between Funds Management and Wells Capital, the Board ascribed limited relevance to the allocation of fees between them.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board also received and considered information about the nature and extent of services offered and fee rates charged by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to other types of clients, if any, with investment strategies similar to those of each Fund. In this regard, the Board received information about the significantly greater scope of services, and compliance, reporting and other legal burdens and risks of managing proprietary mutual funds compared with those associated with managing assets of other types of clients, including third-party sub-advised fund clients and non-mutual fund clients such as institutional separate accounts.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board noted the assurances received by it that there would be no increases to any of the Management Rates or the Sub-Advisory Fee Rates as a result of the Transaction. The Board also considered that the New Agreements do not change the computation method for calculating such fees, and there is no present intention to reduce expense waiver and reimbursement arrangements that are currently in effect. Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Board determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the New Management Agreement and to each of the Sub-Advisers under the New Sub-Advisory Agreements was reasonable.
Profitability
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board received and considered information concerning the profitability of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo from providing services to the fund family as a whole. The Board noted that Wells Capital’s profitability information with respect to providing services to each Fund Wells Capital

36  |  Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
sub-advises and other funds in the family was subsumed in the WFAM and Wells Fargo profitability analysis. The Board did not consider profitability with respect to C&B, as the sub-advisory fees paid to C&B had been negotiated by Funds Management on an arm’s-length basis.
Funds Management reported on the methodologies and estimates used in calculating profitability in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, including a description of the methodology used to allocate certain expenses. Among other things, the Board noted that the levels of profitability reported on a fund-by-fund basis varied widely, depending on factors such as the size, type and age of fund.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board received certain information about NewCo’s projected financial condition, and reviewed with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital the underlying assumptions on which such information was based. The Board considered that NewCo is a newly formed entity, with no historical operations, revenues or expenses, and that it is difficult to predict with any degree of certainty the future profitability of NewCo and the Advisers from advisory activities under the New Agreements. The Board considered that the fee rates payable under the New Agreements will not increase as a result of the Transaction as compared to the rates under the Current Agreements, and that the current contractual expense limitations applicable to each Fund will not increase. The Board noted that if the New Agreements are approved by shareholders and the Transaction closes, the Board will have the opportunity in the future to review the profitability of NewCo and the Advisers from advisory activities under the New Agreements.
Economies of scale
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board received and considered information about the potential for Funds Management to experience economies of scale in the provision of management services to the Funds, the difficulties of calculating economies of scale at an individual fund level, and the extent to which potential scale benefits are shared with Fund shareholders. The Board noted the existence of breakpoints in each Fund’s management fee structure, which operate generally to reduce the Fund’s expense ratios as the Fund grows in size, and the size of the Fund in relation to such breakpoints. The Board considered that, in addition to management fee breakpoints, Funds Management shares potential economies of scale from its management business in a variety of ways, including through fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangements, competitive management fee rates set at the outset without regard to breakpoints, and investments in the business intended to enhance services available to shareholders.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board noted that NewCo and the Advisers may benefit from possible growth of the Funds resulting from enhanced distribution capabilities. However, the Board noted that other factors could also affect the potential for economies of scale, and that it was not possible to quantify any potential future economies of scale. Based upon the information furnished to the Board in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process and the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board concluded that Funds Management’s arrangements with respect to each Fund, including contractual breakpoints and expense limitation arrangements, constituted a reasonable approach to sharing potential economies of scale with the Fund and its shareholders.
“Fall-out” benefits to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board received and considered information regarding potential “fall-out” or ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including Wells Capital, and C&B as a result of their relationships with the Funds. Ancillary benefits could include, among others, benefits directly attributable to other relationships with the Funds and benefits potentially derived from an increase in Funds Management’s and the Sub-Advisers’ business as a result of their relationships with the Funds. The Board noted that various current affiliates of Funds Management may receive distribution-related fees, shareholder servicing payments and sub-transfer agency fees in respect of shares sold or held through them and services provided.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board also reviewed information about soft dollar credits earned and utilized by the Sub-Advisers, fees earned by Funds Management and Wells Capital from managing a private investment vehicle for the fund family’s securities lending collateral, and commissions earned by an affiliated broker of Wells Fargo from portfolio transactions.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board received information to the effect that the Transaction is not expected to have a material impact on the fall-out benefits currently realized by Funds Management and its affiliates, including Wells Capital, and C&B. The information reviewed by the Board also noted that several of the ancillary benefits identified for WFAM would be potential ancillary benefits for NewCo, including that the scale and reputation of the Funds might benefit NewCo’s broader reputation, product initiatives, technology investment and talent acquisition. Based on its consideration of the

Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund  |  37


Board considerations (unaudited)
factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Board did not find that any ancillary benefits expected to be received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including NewCo and Wells Capital, and C&B under the New Agreements were unreasonable.
Conclusion
At the Board Meeting, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and to each of the Sub-Advisers under the New Agreements is reasonable, approved the New Agreements for a two-year term, and voted to recommend that Fund shareholders approve the New Agreements.

38  |  Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board Considerations - Interim Agreements
At a meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Board Meeting”), the Boards of Trustees (each, a “Board”, and collectively, the “Boards”) of Wells Fargo Funds Trust, Wells Fargo Master Trust, Wells Fargo Variable Trust, Wells Fargo Global Dividend Opportunity Fund, Wells Fargo Income Opportunities Fund, Wells Fargo Multi-Sector Income Fund and Wells Fargo Utilities and High Income Fund (each a “Trust”, and the series thereof, a “Fund”) reviewed and approved for the Trusts and Funds, as applicable: (i) interim investment management agreements (the “Interim Management Agreements”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”); (ii) interim investment advisory agreements (the “Interim Advisory Agreements”) with Funds Management; and (iii) interim sub-advisory agreements (the “Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements”) with each of Cooke & Bieler, L.P., Galliard Capital Management LLC (“Galliard”), Peregrine Capital Management Inc., Wells Capital Management LLC (“WellsCap”), and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited (“WFAMI”, and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”). Each Trustee on the Board is not an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) of the Funds (collectively, the “Independent Trustees”). The Interim Management Agreements, Interim Advisory Agreements, and Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements are collectively referred to as the “Interim Advisory Agreements.”
At the Board Meeting, the Boards reviewed and approved the continuation of existing investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements (the “Current Advisory Agreements”) for each Trust and Fund, as applicable. The factors considered and conclusions reached by the Boards in approving the Current Advisory Agreements are summarized in the section entitled “Board Considerations – Current Agreements” of this shareholder report. The Boards noted that Wells Fargo & Company has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”), which includes Funds Management, Galliard, WellsCap and WFAMI (the “Affiliated Sub-Advisers”), to a holding company affiliated with private funds of GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. (the “Transaction”). The Boards further noted that the Transaction would result in a change-of-control of Funds Management and the Affiliated Sub-Advisers, which would be considered to be an “assignment” under the 1940 Act that would terminate the Current Advisory Agreements. At the Board Meeting, the Boards also reviewed and approved new investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements (the “New Advisory Agreements”) for each Trust and Fund, as applicable, that would replace the Current Advisory Agreements upon consummation of the Transaction, subject to approval of the New Advisory Agreements by the applicable Trust’s or Fund’s shareholders. The factors considered and conclusions reached by the Boards in approving the New Advisory Agreements are summarized in the section entitled “Board Considerations – New Agreements” of this shareholder report.
At the Board Meeting, the Boards also approved the Interim Advisory Agreements, which will go into effect for a Trust or Fund only in the event that shareholders of such Trust or Fund do not approve the New Advisory Agreement(s) for the Trust or Fund by the closing date of the Transaction, when the Current Advisory Agreements will terminate. The Board noted that, in such a circumstance, the Interim Advisory Agreements will permit continuity of management by allowing Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to continue providing services to the Trust or Fund pursuant to the Interim Advisory Agreements while the Trust or Fund continues to solicit shareholder approval of such New Advisory Agreement(s). The Boards noted that the terms of the Interim Advisory Agreements are identical to those of the Current Advisory Agreements, except for the term and the addition of escrow provisions with respect to the advisory fees. The Boards also noted that the entities that would service the Funds and Trusts under the Interim Advisory Agreements are identical to those that provide services under the Current Advisory Agreements and those that will provide services under the New Advisory Agreements.
In approving the Interim Advisory Agreements, the Boards considered the same factors and reached the same conclusions as they considered and reached with respect to the Boards’ approvals of the Current Advisory Agreements and New Advisory Agreements, as applicable, which are described in separate Board Consideration sections within this shareholder report. Prior to the Board Meeting, including at a series of meetings held in April and May 2021, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. about the Interim Advisory Agreements and related matters. The Independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Interim Advisory Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately.
At the Board Meeting, after considering the factors and reaching the conclusions described in the separate Board Consideration sections within this shareholder report, the Boards unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and to each Sub-Adviser under each of the Interim Advisory Agreements was reasonable, and approved the Interim Advisory Agreements.

Wells Fargo Diversified Equity Fund  |  39


For more information
More information about Wells Fargo Funds is available free upon request. To obtain literature, please write, visit the Fund's website, or call:
Wells Fargo Funds
P.O. Box 219967
Kansas City, MO 64121-9967
Website: wfam.com
Individual investors: 1-800-222-8222
Retail investment professionals: 1-888-877-9275
Institutional investment professionals: 1-866-765-0778
This report and the financial statements contained herein are submitted for the general information of the shareholders of the Fund. If this report is used for promotional purposes, distribution of the report must be accompanied or preceded by a current prospectus. Before investing, please consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of the investment. For a current prospectus and, if available, a summary prospectus, containing this information, call 1-800-222-8222 or visit the Fund's website at wfam.com. Read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) is the trade name for certain investment advisory/management firms owned by Wells Fargo & Company. These firms include but are not limited to Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC. Certain products managed by WFAM entities are distributed by Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC (a broker-dealer and Member FINRA).
This material is for general informational and educational purposes only and is NOT intended to provide investment advice or a recommendation of any kind - including a recommendation for any specific investment, strategy, or plan.
 INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED  ■  NO BANK GUARANTEE  ■  MAY LOSE VALUE 
© 2021 Wells Fargo & Company. All rights reserved.
PAR-0621-00761 07-21
A281/AR281 05-21


Annual Report
May 31, 2021
Wells Fargo
Emerging Growth Fund




Contents

2

6

11
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund  

12
Financial statements  

13

14

15

16

21

26
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio  

27
Financial statements  

32

33

34

35

36

41

42
Board considerations  

47

51

57
 
Reduce clutter.
Save trees.
Sign up for electronic delivery of prospectuses and shareholder reports at wellsfargo.com/ advantagedelivery
The views expressed and any forward-looking statements are as of May 31, 2021, unless otherwise noted, and are those of the Fund's portfolio managers and/or Wells Fargo Asset Management. Discussions of individual securities or the markets generally are not intended as individual recommendations. Future events or results may vary significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. The views expressed are subject to change at any time in response to changing circumstances in the market. Wells Fargo Asset Management and the Fund disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any views expressed or forward-looking statements.
 INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED  ■  NO BANK GUARANTEE  ■  MAY LOSE VALUE 

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund  |  1


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
Andrew Owen
President
Wells Fargo Funds
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to offer you this annual report for the Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021. Despite the initial challenges presented by the spread of COVID-19 cases and the business restrictions implemented throughout much of the world, global stocks showed robust returns, supported by global stimulus programs, a rapid vaccination rollout, and recovering consumer and corporate sentiment. Bond markets mostly produced positive returns, as investors searched for yield and diversification during difficult market stretches.
For the 12-month period, equities had robust returns, as policymakers continued to fight the effects of COVID-19. Emerging market stocks led both non-U.S. developed market equities and U.S. stocks. Gains by fixed-income securities were varied, though mostly positive. For the period, U.S. stocks, based on the S&P 500 Index,1 gained 40.32%. International stocks, as measured by the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net),2 returned 42.78%, while the MSCI EM Index (Net),3 had stronger performance, with a 51.00% gain. Among bond indexes, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index,4 returned -0.40%, the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (unhedged),5 gained 7.84%, the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index,6 returned 4.74%, and the ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index,7 returned 15.18%.
The COVID-19 lockdown began over a year ago.
By June, economies started to reopen and global central banks committed to do all they could to provide economic support through liquidity and low borrowing costs. U.S. economic activity was aided by one-time $1,200 stimulus checks and $600 weekly bonus unemployment benefits that lasted through July. However, unemployment remained historically high and COVID-19 cases began to increase by late June. China’s economic recovery began to pick up momentum.
July was broadly positive for equities and fixed income. However, economic data and a resurgence of COVID-19 cases underscored the urgent need to regain control of the pandemic. Second-quarter gross domestic product (GDP) shrank from the previous quarter by 9.5% and 12.1% in the U.S. and the eurozone, respectively. In contrast, China’s second-quarter GDP grew 3.2% year over year. The U.S. economy added 1.8 million jobs in July, but a double-digit jobless rate persisted.

1 The S&P 500 Index consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. It is a market-value-weighted index with each stock's weight in the index proportionate to its market value. You cannot invest directly in an index.
2 The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) All Country World Index (ACWI) ex USA Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed and emerging markets, excluding the United States. Source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI. You cannot invest directly in an index.
3 The MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure equity market performance of emerging markets. You cannot invest directly in an index.
4 The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based benchmark that measures the investment-grade, U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage pass-throughs), asset-backed securities, and commercial mortgage-backed securities. You cannot invest directly in an index.
5 The Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (unhedged) is an unmanaged index that provides a broad-based measure of the global investment-grade fixed-income markets excluding the U.S. dollar-denominated debt market. You cannot invest directly in an index.
6 The Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index composed of long-term tax-exempt bonds with a minimum credit rating of Baa. You cannot invest directly in an index.
7 The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index of domestic and Yankee high-yield bonds. The index tracks the performance of high-yield securities traded in the U.S. bond market. You cannot invest directly in an index. Copyright 2021. ICE Data Indices, LLC. All rights reserved.

2  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
The stock market continued to rally in August despite concerns over rising numbers of U.S. and European COVID-19 cases as well as the July expiration of the $600 weekly bonus unemployment benefit. Relatively strong second-quarter earnings boosted investor sentiment along with the U.S. Federal Reserve Board’s (Fed’s) announcement of a monetary policy shift expected to support longer-term low interest rates. U.S. manufacturing and services activity indexes beat expectations while the U.S. housing market maintained strength. In Europe, retail sales expanded and consumer confidence was steady. China’s economy continued to expand.
Stocks grew more volatile in September on mixed economic data. U.S. economic activity continued to grow. However, U.S. unemployment remained elevated at 7.9% in September. With the U.S. Congress delaying further fiscal relief and uncertainties surrounding a possible vaccine, doubts crept back into the financial markets. In the U.K., a lack of progress in Brexit talks weighed on markets. China’s economy picked up steam, fueled by increased global demand.
In October, capital markets stepped back from their six-month rally. Market volatility rose in advance of the U.S. election and amid a global increase in COVID-19 infections. Europe introduced tighter restrictions affecting economic activity. U.S. markets looked favorably at the prospect of Democratic control of the federal purse strings, which could lead to additional fiscal stimulus and a boost to economic activity. Meanwhile, China reported 4.9% third-quarter GDP growth.
Global stocks rallied in November, propelled by optimism over three promising COVID-19 vaccines. Reversing recent trends, value stocks outperformed growth stocks and cyclical stocks outpaced information technology (IT) stocks. However, U.S. unemployment remained elevated, with a net job loss of 10 million since February. The eurozone services Purchasing Managers' Index, a monthly survey of purchasing managers, contracted sharply while the region’s manufacturing activity grew. The U.S. election results added to the upbeat mood as investors anticipated more consistent policies in the new administration.
Financial markets ended the year with strength on high expectations for a rapid rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines, the successful passage of a $900 billion stimulus package, and rising expectations of additional economic support from a Democratic-led Congress. U.S. economic data were mixed with still-elevated unemployment and weak retail sales but growth in manufacturing output. In contrast, China’s economic expansion continued in both manufacturing and nonmanufacturing. U.S. COVID-19 infection rates continued to rise even as new state and local lockdown measures were implemented.
The calendar year 2021 began with emerging market stocks leading all major asset classes in January, driven by China’s strong economic growth and a broad recovery in corporate earnings, which propelled China’s stock market higher. In the U.S., positive news on vaccine trials and January expansion in both the manufacturing and services sectors was offset by a weak December monthly jobs report. This was compounded by technical factors as some hedge funds were forced to sell stocks to protect themselves against a well-publicized short squeeze coordinated by a group of retail investors. Eurozone sentiment and economic growth were particularly weak, reflecting the impact of a new lockdown with stricter social distancing along with a slow vaccine rollout.
February saw major domestic equity indexes driven higher on the hope of a new stimulus bill, improving COVID-19 vaccination numbers, and the gradual reopening of the economy. Most S&P 500 companies reported better-than-expected earnings, with positive surprises coming from the financials, IT, health care, and materials sectors. Japan saw its economy strengthen as a result of strong export numbers. Meanwhile, crude oil prices continued their climb, rising more than 25% for the year. Domestic government bonds experienced a sharp sell-off in late February as markets priced in a more robust economic recovery and higher future growth and inflation expectations.
Global stocks rallied in November, propelled by optimism over three promising COVID-19 vaccines.

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund  |  3


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
The passage of the massive domestic stimulus bill highlighted March activity, leading to increased forecasts for U.S. growth in 2021.
The passage of the massive domestic stimulus bill highlighted March activity, leading to increased forecasts for U.S. growth in 2021. Domestic employment surged as COVID-19 vaccinations and an increasingly open economy spurred hiring. A majority of U.S. small companies reported they were operating at pre-pandemic capacity or higher. Value stocks continued its outperformance of growth stocks in the month, continuing the trend that started in late 2020. Meanwhile, most major developed global equity indexes were up month to date on the back of rising optimism regarding the outlook for global growth. While the U.S. and U.K. have been the most successful in terms of the vaccine rollout, even in markets where the vaccine has lagged, such as in the eurozone and Japan, equity indexes in many of those countries have also been in positive territory this year.
Equity markets produced another strong showing in April. Domestically, the continued reopening of the economy had a strong impact on positive equity performance, as people started leaving their households and jobless claims continued to fall. Domestic corporate bonds performed well and the U.S. dollar weakened. Meanwhile, the U.S. government continued to seek to invest in the recovery, this time by outlining a package of over $2 billion to improve infrastructure. The primary headwind in April was inflation, as investors tried to determine the breadth and longevity of recent price increases. Developed Europe has been supported by a meaningful increase in the pace of vaccinations. Unfortunately many emerging market countries have not been as successful. India in particular has seen COVID-19 cases surge, serving as an example of the need to get vaccinations rolled out to less developed nations.
Vaccine rollouts continued in May, leading to loosened restrictions globally. As a result, equity markets in general saw a minor increase in returns. Concerns that the continued economic rebound could result in inflation increases becoming more than transitory were supported by the higher input costs businesses are experiencing. Meanwhile, those inflation concerns were tempered by the Fed, which stayed steady on its view of the economy and eased fears of a sudden and substantial policy change. Positive performance in the emerging market equity space was supported this month by steady consumer demand and strong commodity prices. Fixed-income markets were also slightly positive for the month, driven by inflation uncertainty and a softer U.S. dollar.
Don’t let short-term uncertainty derail long-term investment goals.
Periods of investment uncertainty can present challenges, but experience has taught us that maintaining long-term investment goals can be an effective way to plan for the future. Although diversification cannot guarantee an investment profit or prevent losses, we believe it can be an effective way to manage investment risk and potentially smooth out overall portfolio performance. We encourage investors to know their investments and to understand that appropriate levels of risk-taking may unlock opportunities.
Thank you for choosing to invest with Wells Fargo Funds. We appreciate your confidence in us and remain committed to helping you meet your financial needs.
Sincerely,
Andrew Owen
President
Wells Fargo Funds

For further information about your Fund, contact your investment professional, visit our website at wfam.com, or call us directly at 1-800-222-8222.

4  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund


This page is intentionally left blank.


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Investment objective The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
Manager Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC
Subadviser for the affiliated master portfolio*
Wells Capital Management Incorporated
Portfolio managers Robert Gruendyke, CFA®, David Nazaret, CFA®, Thomas C. Ognar, CFA®
    
Average annual total returns (%) as of May 31, 2021
    Including sales charge   Excluding sales charge   Expense ratios1 (%)
  Inception date 1 year 5 year 10 year   1 year 5 year 10 year   Gross Net 2
Class A (WEMAX) 3-31-2008 44.41 21.97 13.61   53.22 23.43 14.29   1.35 1.28
Class C (WEMCX) 3-31-2008 51.19 22.54 13.45   52.19 22.54 13.45   2.10 2.03
Class R6 (WEGRX)3 7-31-2018   53.85 24.03 14.83   0.92 0.85
Administrator Class (WFGDX) 1-31-2007   53.31 23.56 14.44   1.27 1.20
Institutional Class (WEMIX) 3-31-2008   53.75 23.95 14.79   1.02 0.90
Russell 2000® Growth Index4   50.14 17.57 12.76  
Figures quoted represent past performance, which is no guarantee of future results, and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder may pay on an investment in a fund. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance shown without sales charges would be lower if sales charges were reflected. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted, which assumes the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. Current month-end performance is available on the Fund’s website, wfam.com.
Please keep in mind that high double-digit returns were primarily achieved during favorable market conditions. You should not expect that such favorable returns can be consistently achieved. A fund’s performance, especially for short time periods, should not be the sole factor in making your investment decision.
Index returns do not include transaction costs associated with buying and selling securities, any mutual fund fees or expenses, or any taxes. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
For Class A shares, the maximum front-end sales charge is 5.75%. For Class C shares, the maximum contingent deferred sales charge is 1.00%. Performance including a contingent deferred sales charge assumes the sales charge for the corresponding time period. Class R6, Administrator Class, and Institutional Class shares are sold without a front-end sales charge or contingent deferred sales charge.
1 Reflects the expense ratios as stated in the most recent prospectuses. The expense ratios shown are subject to change and may differ from the annualized expense ratios shown in the financial highlights of this report.
2 The manager has contractually committed through September 30, 2021, to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers at 1.28% for Class A, 2.03% for Class C, 0.85% for Class R6, 1.20% for Administrator Class, and 0.90% for Institutional Class. Brokerage commissions, stamp duty fees, interest, taxes, acquired fund fees and expenses (if any) from funds in which the affiliated master portfolio invests, and extraordinary expenses are excluded from the expense caps. Net expenses from the affiliated master portfolio are included in the expense caps. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. Without these caps, the Fund’s returns would have been lower. The expense ratio paid by an investor is the net expense ratio (the total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers) as stated in the prospectuses.
3 Historical performance shown for the Class R6 shares prior to their inception reflects the performance of the Institutional Class shares, and includes the higher expenses applicable to the Institutional Class shares. If these expenses had been included, returns for the Class R6 shares would be higher.
4 The Russell 2000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 companies with higher price/book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. You cannot invest directly in an index.

* The Fund is a feeder fund in a master-feeder structure that invests substantially all of its assets in a single affiliated master portfolio of the Wells Fargo Master Trust with a substantially identical investment objective and substantially similar investment strategies. References to the investment activities of the Fund are intended to refer to the investment activities of the affiliated master portfolio in which it invests.
CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.
Mr. Gruendyke and Mr. Nazaret became portfolio managers of the Fund on July 28, 2020.

6  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Growth of $10,000 investment as of May 31, 20211
1 The chart compares the performance of Class A shares for the most recent ten years with the Russell 2000® Growth Index. The chart assumes a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in Class A shares and reflects all operating expenses and assumes the maximum initial sales charge of 5.75%.
Stock values fluctuate in response to the activities of individual companies and general market and economic conditions. Smaller-company stocks tend to be more volatile and less liquid than those of larger companies. Certain investment strategies tend to increase the total risk of an investment (relative to the broader market). The Fund is exposed to foreign investment risk. Consult the Fund’s prospectus for additional information on these and other risks.

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund  |  7


Performance highlights (unaudited)

8  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund


Performance highlights (unaudited)
MANAGER'S DISCUSSION
Fund highlights
The Fund outperformed the Russell 2000® Growth Index for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021.
Relative performance contributions came from select medical device and biotech stocks within health care as well as select stocks within consumer discretionary.
Detractors from the Fund mainly stemmed from specialty insurance stocks within financials and stocks within industrials.
Stimulus measures helped support a strong economic recovery.
Following one of the most discordant periods in decades, the markets welcomed one of the strongest economic recoveries ever aided by overwhelming monetary and fiscal accommodation. After injecting a number of stimulus measures, economic data gradually improved over the course of 2020. Late in the year, the economy hit an inflection point after several vaccination approvals from key drug makers were announced. Further cyclical strength was propelled by the Democratic sweep of the presidency and both chambers of Congress, as many believed additional fiscal stimulus would be easier to pass with a Democratic majority. These dynamics spawned one of the biggest rotations from growth to value on record, abetted by much faster gross domestic product growth, higher interest rates along with a steeping yield curve, and unprecedented positive earnings revisions for the broad-based market. While we expected this dynamic to unfold during the recovery and fully understand its general premise, we remain fully confident in the structural advantages of the growth stocks we own and the favorable backdrop around secular tailwinds like the digitization of the economy.
Ten largest holdings (%) as of May 31, 20211
Shockwave Medical Incorporated 3.24
ASGN Incorporated 3.12
Rapid7 Incorporated 2.70
Vericel Corporation 2.64
Crocs Incorporated 2.52
Rexnord Corporation 2.40
Q2 Holdings Incorporated 2.33
Boot Barn Holdings Incorporated 2.25
Novanta Incorporated 2.10
Freshpet Incorporated 2.05
1 Each holding represents the Fund’s allocable portion of the affiliated master portfolio security. Figures represent each holding as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets. Holdings are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
Health care and consumer discretionary served as contributors to the Fund.
Within health care, select biotechnology holdings and medical device stocks were rewarded for their durable business models and solid fundamentals. Strength in the Fund came from ShockWave Medical Incorporated, a medical device company focused on developing and commercializing products in the cardiovascular industry. The stock rallied sharply after beating revenue expectations, highlighting a significant sequential improvement in its business as volumes surpassed pre-COVID-19 levels. Within biotech, Vericel Corporation, a commercial stage regenerative medicine company, rose sharply after the company delivered better-than-expected revenue growth from its MACI segment, a product used for cartilage repair. Stocks within consumer discretionary rose sharply as several retailers garnered increased traffic as they reopened doors during the period. Notable strength in the sector came from Fiverr International Limited, which operates a two-sided e-commerce marketplace connecting businesses with freelancers. The stock rallied strongly after generating strength in virtually all areas of its business as demand for its solutions was pervasive with more people working from home.
Financials and industrials stocks hindered relative performance.
Weakness in the Fund came mainly from select stocks within the financials and industrials sectors. Within financials, eHealth Incorporated*, an online health insurance provider, fell due to weakness from its individual, family, and small business segment. Within industrials, our underweight to several of the more cyclical constituents within the index hindered performance as housing-related stocks, machinery, and select alternative energy names rallied strongly during the period. Mercury Systems Incorporated, a defense electronics supplier, underperformed given their more defensive nature and lingering concerns around the defense budget. Additional weakness came from the technology sector as select software stocks sold off late in the period with many investors taking profits in stocks that were perceived as “COVID-19 winners” throughout 2020.
 

* This security was no longer held at the end of the reporting period.

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund  |  9


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Sector allocation as of May 31, 20211
1 Figures represent the sector allocation of the affiliated master portfolio as a percentage of the long-term investments of the affiliated master portfolio. These amounts are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
Looking ahead, we are guardedly optimistic
We continue to have conviction in our investments surrounding the digitization of our economy. As we have highlighted over the past few years, this trend has been personified within stocks that fall into our software-as-a-service (SaaS), cloud computing, online/e-commerce, digital payments, the internet of things, and innovation (SCODIi). We believe the digital movement is in its infancy and has proven its resiliency amid the economic turmoil in 2020. Specifically, we have targeted companies across the portfolio that are extracting value from SCODIi. Even before the pandemic, the confluence of these trends had already achieved the critical mass to transform entire industries. Today, behavioral changes following the onset of the pandemic have only accelerated these advances. Importantly, we have exposure beyond the technology space as companies in most economic sectors are harnessing these drivers into the backbone of their business.
Through opportunity cost investing, we continue to maximize our opportunities based on our criteria of robust, sustainable, and underappreciated growth. We proudly adhere to our bottom-up process and believe that it is a key to our success. One of our key mantras is we go where the underappreciated growth will be, and we combine that with a diversified approach to portfolio construction that enhances opportunities. This philosophy has helped us generate strong returns over time.
 

10  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund


Fund expenses (unaudited)
As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and contingent deferred sales charges (if any) on redemptions and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) and/or shareholder servicing fees, and other Fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period from December 1, 2020 to May 31, 2021.
Actual expenses
The “Actual” line of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the “Actual” line under the heading entitled “Expenses paid during period” for your applicable class of shares to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes
The “Hypothetical” line of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) and contingent deferred sales charges. Therefore, the “Hypothetical” line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
  Beginning
account value
12-1-2020
Ending
account value
5-31-2021
Expenses
paid during
the period1,2
Annualized net
expense ratio2
Class A        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,108.10 $ 6.67 1.27%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,018.60 $ 6.39 1.27%
Class C        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,104.21 $10.65 2.03%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,014.81 $10.20 2.03%
Class R6        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,110.87 $ 4.47 0.85%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,020.69 $ 4.28 0.85%
Administrator Class        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,108.70 $ 6.31 1.20%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,018.95 $ 6.04 1.20%
Institutional Class        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,110.69 $ 4.74 0.90%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,020.44 $ 4.53 0.90%
1 Expenses paid is equal to the annualized net expense ratio of each class multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one-half-year period).
2 Amounts reflect net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio in which the Fund invests.

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund  |  11


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

          Value
Investment companies:  99.93%          
Affiliated master portfolio:  99.93%          
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio         $911,598,606
Total Investment companies (Cost $517,077,569)         911,598,606
Total investments in securities (Cost $517,077,569) 99.93%       911,598,606
Other assets and liabilities, net 0.07           605,670
Total net assets 100.00%       $912,204,276
Transactions with the affiliated Master Portfolio were as follows:
  % of
ownership,
beginning
of period
% of
ownership,
end of
period
Net realized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Dividends
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Affiliated
income
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Value,
end of
period
% of
net
assets
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio 91.59% 95.20% $164,596,232 $172,105,999 $983,917 $247,659 $911,598,606 99.93%
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

12  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund


Statement of assets and liabilities—May 31, 2021
   
Assets  
Investments in affiliated Master Portfolio, at value (cost $517,077,569)

$ 911,598,606
Receivable for Fund shares sold

1,150,251
Receivable from manager

28,462
Prepaid expenses and other assets

18,902
Total assets

912,796,221
Liabilities  
Payable for Fund shares redeemed

345,225
Administration fees payable

111,521
Shareholder report expenses payable

56,783
Shareholder servicing fees payable

50,596
Distribution fee payable

1,463
Accrued expenses and other liabilities

26,357
Total liabilities

591,945
Total net assets

$912,204,276
Net assets consist of  
Paid-in capital

$ 446,780,259
Total distributable earnings

465,424,017
Total net assets

$912,204,276
Computation of net asset value and offering price per share  
Net assets – Class A

$ 210,837,646
Shares outstanding – Class A1

11,679,940
Net asset value per share – Class A

$18.05
Maximum offering price per share – Class A2

$19.15
Net assets – Class C

$ 2,337,546
Shares outstanding – Class C1

162,269
Net asset value per share – Class C

$14.41
Net assets – Class R6

$ 21,729,307
Shares outstanding – Class R61

1,052,948
Net asset value per share – Class R6

$20.64
Net assets – Administrator Class

$ 28,730,324
Shares outstanding – Administrator Class1

1,513,677
Net asset value per share – Administrator Class

$18.98
Net assets – Institutional Class

$ 648,569,453
Shares outstanding – Institutional Class1

31,558,046
Net asset value per share – Institutional Class

$20.55
1 The Fund has an unlimited number of authorized shares.
2 Maximum offering price is computed as 100/94.25 of net asset value. On investments of $50,000 or more, the offering price is reduced.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund  |  13


Statement of operations—year ended May 31, 2021
   
Investment income  
Dividends allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

$ 983,917
Affiliated income allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

247,659
Expenses allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

(6,652,008)
Total investment income

(5,420,432)
Expenses  
Management fee

411,876
Administration fees  
Class A

407,505
Class C

4,279
Class R6

6,700
Administrator Class

34,539
Institutional Class

752,391
Shareholder servicing fees  
Class A

484,730
Class C

5,090
Administrator Class

66,300
Distribution fee  
Class C

15,270
Custody and accounting fees

24,760
Professional fees

33,973
Registration fees

73,287
Shareholder report expenses

69,204
Trustees’ fees and expenses

21,080
Other fees and expenses

14,512
Total expenses

2,425,496
Less: Fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements  
Fund-level

(545,475)
Class A

(23,158)
Administrator Class

(8)
Institutional Class

(289,381)
Net expenses

1,567,474
Net investment loss

(6,987,906)
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments  
Net realized gains on securities transactions allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

164,596,232
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on securities transactions allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

172,105,999
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

336,702,231
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

$329,714,325
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

14  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund


Statement of changes in net assets
         
  Year ended
May 31, 2021
Year ended
May 31, 2020
Operations        
Net investment loss

  $ (6,987,906)   $ (5,696,248)
Net realized gains on investments

  164,596,232   87,082,930
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

  172,105,999   4,916,772
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

  329,714,325   86,303,454
Distributions to shareholders from        
Net investment income and net realized gains        
Class A

  (40,824,693)   (7,796,239)
Class C

  (488,552)   (97,557)
Class R6

  (4,264,478)   (245,756)
Administrator Class

  (5,278,969)   (1,143,908)
Institutional Class

  (104,301,425)   (28,466,003)
Total distributions to shareholders

  (155,158,117)   (37,749,463)
Capital share transactions Shares   Shares  
Proceeds from shares sold        
Class A

594,602 10,958,344 270,025 3,503,910
Class C

67,936 1,035,606 14,056 158,468
Class R6

203,245 4,206,281 1,351,041 21,252,448
Administrator Class

354,817 6,842,617 185,559 2,546,018
Institutional Class

8,415,847 166,124,291 7,701,460 113,827,845
    189,167,139   141,288,689
Reinvestment of distributions        
Class A

2,332,324 38,903,166 556,631 7,609,147
Class C

36,568 488,552 8,439 97,557
Class R6

68,148 1,296,851 16,154 244,735
Administrator Class

299,668 5,253,185 80,016 1,137,821
Institutional Class

5,494,647 104,178,513 1,832,144 27,683,692
    150,120,267   36,772,952
Payment for shares redeemed        
Class A

(1,365,780) (24,392,486) (1,506,830) (19,951,780)
Class C

(71,196) (1,109,781) (45,564) (513,234)
Class R6

(409,558) (8,565,269) (177,590) 2,654,701
Administrator Class

(528,979) (9,983,853) (557,050) (7,634,612)
Institutional Class

(11,301,966) (220,272,610) (19,569,429) (282,480,504)
    (264,323,999)   (313,234,831)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from capital share transactions

  74,963,407   (135,173,190)
Total increase (decrease) in net assets

  249,519,615   (86,619,199)
Net assets        
Beginning of period

  662,684,661   749,303,860
End of period

  $ 912,204,276   $ 662,684,661
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund  |  15


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class A 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$14.71 $13.51 $17.04 $14.57 $12.55
Net investment loss

(0.20) 1 (0.17) (0.16) 1 (0.15) (0.10) 1
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

7.69 2.13 (0.19) 4.57 2.96
Total from investment operations

7.49 1.96 (0.35) 4.42 2.86
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net realized gains

(4.15) (0.76) (3.18) (1.95) (0.84)
Net asset value, end of period

$18.05 $14.71 $13.51 $17.04 $14.57
Total return2

53.22% 14.97% (0.84)% 32.91% 23.39%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

1.35% 1.36% 1.35% 1.36% 1.36%
Net expenses

1.27% 1.27% 1.29% 1.35% 1.35%
Net investment loss

(1.12)% (1.08)% (1.06)% (1.01)% (0.72)%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate3

48% 55% 71% 47% 115%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$210,838 $148,866 $145,898 $153,526 $129,724
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.81%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.81%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.81%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.81%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.81%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges.
3 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

16  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class C 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$12.40 $11.58 $15.19 $13.28 $11.58
Net investment loss

(0.28) 1 (0.21) 1 (0.25) 1 (0.25) 1 (0.19) 1
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

6.44 1.79 (0.18) 4.11 2.73
Total from investment operations

6.16 1.58 (0.43) 3.86 2.54
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net realized gains

(4.15) (0.76) (3.18) (1.95) (0.84)
Net asset value, end of period

$14.41 $12.40 $11.58 $15.19 $13.28
Total return2

52.19% 14.16% (1.55)% 31.82% 22.56%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

2.10% 2.11% 2.10% 2.11% 2.11%
Net expenses

2.03% 2.03% 2.04% 2.10% 2.10%
Net investment loss

(1.89)% (1.84)% (1.78)% (1.76)% (1.46)%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate3

48% 55% 71% 47% 115%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$2,338 $1,599 $1,761 $4,190 $3,328
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.81%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.81%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.81%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.81%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.81%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges.
3 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund  |  17


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class R6 2021 2020 2019 1
Net asset value, beginning of period

$16.34 $14.86 $18.70
Net investment loss

(0.14) (0.10) 2 (0.07) 2
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

8.59 2.34 (0.59)
Total from investment operations

8.45 2.24 (0.66)
Distributions to shareholders from      
Net realized gains

(4.15) (0.76) (3.18)
Net asset value, end of period

$20.64 $16.34 $14.86
Total return3

53.85% 15.51% (2.35)%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*      
Gross expenses

0.92% 0.93% 0.92%
Net expenses

0.85% 0.85% 0.85%
Net investment loss

(0.68)% (0.67)% (0.51)%
Supplemental data      
Portfolio turnover rate4

48% 55% 71%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$21,729 $19,458 $22
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.81%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.81%
Year ended May 31, 20191 0.81%
    
1 For the period from July 31, 2018 (commencement of class operations) to May 31, 2019
2 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
3 Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.
4 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

18  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Administrator Class 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$15.31 $14.02 $17.54 $14.93 $12.82
Net investment loss

(0.20) 1 (0.14) 1 (0.15) 1 (0.14) 1 (0.07) 1
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

8.02 2.19 (0.19) 4.70 3.02
Total from investment operations

7.82 2.05 (0.34) 4.56 2.95
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net realized gains

(4.15) (0.76) (3.18) (1.95) (0.84)
Net asset value, end of period

$18.98 $15.31 $14.02 $17.54 $14.93
Total return

53.31% 15.07% (0.75)% 33.06% 23.60%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

1.27% 1.28% 1.27% 1.28% 1.26%
Net expenses

1.20% 1.20% 1.20% 1.20% 1.20%
Net investment loss

(1.05)% (1.01)% (0.94)% (0.86)% (0.48)%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate2

48% 55% 71% 47% 115%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$28,730 $21,250 $23,549 $52,335 $50,865
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.81%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.81%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.81%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.81%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.81%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund  |  19


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Institutional Class 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$16.29 $14.83 $18.30 $15.46 $13.20
Net investment loss

(0.15) (0.11) 1 (0.13) (0.09) (0.04) 1
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

8.56 2.33 (0.16) 4.88 3.14
Total from investment operations

8.41 2.22 (0.29) 4.79 3.10
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net realized gains

(4.15) (0.76) (3.18) (1.95) (0.84)
Net asset value, end of period

$20.55 $16.29 $14.83 $18.30 $15.46
Total return

53.75% 15.40% (0.42)% 33.44% 24.08%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

1.02% 1.03% 1.02% 1.03% 1.03%
Net expenses

0.90% 0.90% 0.90% 0.90% 0.90%
Net investment loss

(0.75)% (0.71)% (0.67)% (0.56)% (0.24)%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate2

48% 55% 71% 47% 115%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$648,569 $471,512 $578,073 $606,729 $534,846
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.81%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.81%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.81%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.81%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.81%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

20  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund


Notes to financial statements
1. ORGANIZATION
Wells Fargo Funds Trust (the "Trust"), a Delaware statutory trust organized on March 10, 1999, is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). As an investment company, the Trust follows the accounting and reporting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, Financial Services – Investment Companies. These financial statements report on the Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund (the "Fund") which is a diversified series of the Trust.
The Fund is a feeder fund in a master-feeder structure that invests substantially all of its assets in a single master portfolio with a substantially identical investment objective and substantially similar investment strategies. The Fund invests in Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio, a separate diversified portfolio (the “affiliated Master Portfolio”) of Wells Fargo Master Trust, a registered open-end management investment company. As of May 31, 2021, the Fund owned 95.20% of Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio. The affiliated Master Portfolio directly acquires portfolio securities and the Fund acquires an indirect interest in those securities. The Fund accounts for its investment in the affiliated Master Portfolio as a partnership investment and records on a daily basis its share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s income, expense and realized and unrealized gains and losses. The financial statements of the affiliated Master Portfolio for the year ended May 31, 2021 are included in this report and should be read in conjunction with the Fund’s financial statements.
On February 23, 2021, Wells Fargo & Company announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management ("WFAM") to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. WFAM is the trade name used by the asset management businesses of Wells Fargo & Company and includes Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the investment manager to the Fund, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, both registered investment advisers providing sub-advisory services to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Fund's principal underwriter. As part of the transaction, Wells Fargo & Company will own a 9.9% equity interest and will continue to serve as an important client and distribution partner.
Consummation of the transaction will result in the automatic termination of the Fund's investment management agreement and subadvisory agreement. The Fund's Board of Trustees approved a new investment management and new subadvisory agreement and approved submitting the agreements to the Fund’s shareholders for approval at a special meeting of shareholders expected to be held on August 16, 2021. Shareholders of record of the Fund at the close of business on May 28, 2021 are entitled to vote at the meeting. If shareholders approve the new agreements, they would take effect upon the closing of the transaction. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
This shareholder report is not asking you for a proxy. A separate proxy statement with more detailed information about the transaction will be provided to Fund shareholders and should be reviewed carefully.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following significant accounting policies, which are consistently followed in the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund, are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Securities valuation
All investments are valued each business day as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4 p.m. Eastern Time), although the Fund may deviate from this calculation time under unusual or unexpected circumstances.
Investments in the affiliated Master Portfolio are valued daily based on the Fund’s proportionate share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s net assets, which are also valued daily. Securities held in the affiliated Master Portfolio are valued as discussed in the Notes to Financial Statements of the affiliated Master Portfolio, which are included elsewhere in this report.
Investments which are not valued using any of the methods discussed above are valued at their fair value, as determined in good faith by the Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees has established a Valuation Committee comprised of the Trustees and has delegated to it the authority to take any actions regarding the valuation of portfolio securities that the Valuation Committee deems necessary or appropriate, including determining the fair value of portfolio securities, unless the determination has been delegated to the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee at Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC ("Funds Management"). The Board of Trustees retains the authority to make or ratify any valuation decisions or approve any changes to the Valuation Procedures as it deems appropriate. On a quarterly basis, the Board of Trustees

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund  |  21


Notes to financial statements
receives reports on any valuation actions taken by the Valuation Committee or the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee which may include items for ratification.
Investment transactions, income and expenses
Investments in the affiliated Master Portfolio are recorded on a trade date basis. The Fund records daily its proportionate share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s income, expenses and realized and unrealized gains or losses. The Fund also accrues its own expenses.
Distributions to shareholders
Distributions to shareholders from net investment income and any net realized gains are recorded on the ex-dividend date and paid at least annually. Such distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations and may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Dividend sources are estimated at the time of declaration. The tax character of distributions is determined as of the Fund's fiscal year end. Therefore, a portion of the Fund's distributions made prior to the Fund’s fiscal year end may be categorized as a tax return of capital at year end.
Federal and other taxes
The Fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by distributing substantially all of its investment company taxable income and any net realized capital gains (after reduction for capital loss carryforwards) sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes. Accordingly, no provision for federal income taxes was required.
The Fund’s income and federal excise tax returns and all financial records supporting those returns for the prior three fiscal years are subject to examination by the federal and Delaware revenue authorities. Management has analyzed the Fund's tax positions taken on federal, state, and foreign tax returns for all open tax years and does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability.
As of May 31, 2021, the aggregate cost of all investments for federal income tax purposes was $517,827,023 and the unrealized gains (losses) consisted of:
Gross unrealized gains $394,521,037
Gross unrealized losses (749,454)
Net unrealized gains $393,771,583
Reclassifications are made to the Fund’s capital accounts for permanent tax differences to reflect income and gains available for distribution (or available capital loss carryforwards) under federal income tax regulations. U.S. generally accepted accounting principles require that certain components of net assets be adjusted to reflect permanent differences between financial and tax reporting. These reclassifications have no effect on net assets or net asset values per share. The primary permanent difference causing such reclassification is due to net operating losses. At May 31, 2021, as a result of permanent book-to-tax differences, the following reclassification adjustments were made on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities:
Paid-in
capital
Total distributable
earnings
$(6,802,370) $6,802,370
As of May 31, 2021, the Fund had a qualified late-year ordinary loss of $2,571,417 which will be recognized on the first day of the following fiscal year.
Class allocations
The separate classes of shares offered by the Fund differ principally in applicable sales charges, distribution, shareholder servicing, and administration fees. Class specific expenses are charged directly to that share class. Investment income, common fund-level expenses, and realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative proportion of net assets of each class.

22  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund


Notes to financial statements
3. FAIR VALUATION MEASUREMENTS
At May 31, 2021, the Fund’s investment in an affiliated Master Portfolio was measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient. The investment objective and fair value of the affiliated Master Portfolio is as follows:
Affiliated Master Portfolio Investment objective Fair value of affiliated
Master Portfolio
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio Seek long-term capital appreciation $911,598,606
The affiliated Master Portfolio does not have a redemption period notice, can be redeemed daily and does not have any unfunded commitments.
4. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
Management fee
Funds Management, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company ("Wells Fargo"), is the manager of the Fund and provides advisory and fund-level administrative services under an investment management agreement. Under the investment management agreement, Funds Management is responsible for, among other services, implementing the investment objectives and strategies of the Fund and providing fund-level administrative services in connection with the Fund’s operations. As long as the Fund continues to invest substantially all of its assets in a single affiliated Master Portfolio, the Fund pays Funds Management an investment management fee only for fund-level administrative services at the following annual rate based on the Fund’s average daily net assets:
Average daily net assets Management fee
First $5 billion 0.050%
Next $5 billion 0.040
Over $10 billion 0.030
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the management fee was equivalent to an annual rate of 0.05% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
Funds Management also serves as the adviser to the affiliated Master Portfolio and is entitled to receive a fee from the affiliated Master Portfolio for those services.
Administration fees
Under a class-level administration agreement, Funds Management provides class-level administrative services to the Fund, which includes paying fees and expenses for services provided by the transfer agent, sub-transfer agents, omnibus account servicers and record-keepers. As compensation for its services under the class-level administration agreement, Funds Management receives an annual fee which is calculated based on the average daily net assets of each class as follows:
  Class-level
administration fee
Class A 0.21%
Class C 0.21
Class R6 0.03
Administrator Class 0.13
Institutional Class 0.13
Waivers and/or expense reimbursements
Funds Management has contractually waived and/or reimbursed management and administration fees to the extent necessary to maintain certain net operating expense ratios for the Fund. When each class of the Fund has exceeded its expense cap, Funds Management has waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses from fund-level expenses on a proportionate basis and then from class specific expenses. When only certain classes exceed their expense caps, waivers and/or reimbursements are applied

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund  |  23


Notes to financial statements
against class specific expenses before fund-level expenses. Net expenses from the affiliated Master Portfolio are included in the expense caps. Funds Management has committed through September 30, 2021 to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap expenses. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. The contractual expense caps are as follows:
  Expense ratio caps
Class A 1.28%
Class C 2.03
Class R6 0.85
Administrator Class 1.20
Institutional Class 0.90
Distribution fee
The Trust has adopted a distribution plan for Class C shares of the Fund pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. A distribution fee is charged to Class C shares and paid to Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC ("Funds Distributor"), the principal underwriter, at an annual rate of 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class C shares.
In addition, Funds Distributor is entitled to receive the front-end sales charge from the purchase of Class A shares and a contingent deferred sales charge on the redemption of certain Class A shares. Funds Distributor is also entitled to receive the contingent deferred sales charges from redemptions of Class C shares. Funds Distributor did not receive any front-end or contingent deferred sales charges from Class A or Class C shares for the year ended May 31, 2021.
Shareholder servicing fees
The Trust has entered into contracts with one or more shareholder servicing agents, whereby Class A, Class C, and Administrator Class of the Fund are charged a fee at an annual rate of 0.25% of the average daily net assets of each respective class. A portion of these total shareholder servicing fees were paid to affiliates of Wells Fargo.
5. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS
The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing substantially all of its assets in a single affiliated Master Portfolio. Purchases and sales have been calculated by multiplying the Fund's ownership percentage of the affiliated Master Portfolio by the affiliated Master Portfolio's purchases and sales. Purchases and sales of investments, excluding U.S. government obligations (if any) and short-term securities, for the year ended May 31, 2021 were $389,544,707 and $499,482,047, respectively.
6. BANK BORROWINGS
The Trust (excluding the money market funds), Wells Fargo Master Trust and Wells Fargo Variable Trust are parties to a $350,000,000 revolving credit agreement whereby the Fund is permitted to use bank borrowings for temporary or emergency purposes, such as to fund shareholder redemption requests. Interest under the credit agreement is charged to the Fund based on a borrowing rate equal to the higher of the Federal Funds rate in effect on that day plus 1.25% or the overnight LIBOR rate in effect on that day plus 1.25%. In addition, an annual commitment fee equal to 0.25% of the unused balance is allocated to each participating fund.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, there were no borrowings by the Fund under the agreement.
7. DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS
The tax character of distributions paid during the years ended May 31, 2021 and May 31, 2020 were as follows:
  Year ended May 31
  2021 2020
Ordinary income $ 11,568,904 $ 0
Long-term capital gain 143,589,213 37,749,463

24  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund


Notes to financial statements
As of May 31, 2021, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Undistributed
long-term
gain
Unrealized
gains
Late-year
ordinary
losses
deferred
$74,223,851 $393,771,583 $(2,571,417)
8. CONCENTRATION RISKS
Concentration risks result from exposure to a limited number of sectors. Through its investment in the affiliated Master Portfolio which may invest a substantial portion of its assets in any sector, the Fund may in turn be more affected by changes in that sector than a fund whose investments are not heavily weighted in any sector. As of the end of the period, the affiliated Master Portfolio concentrated its portfolio in investments related to the health care and information technology sectors.
9. INDEMNIFICATION
Under the Fund's organizational documents, the officers and Trustees have been granted certain indemnification rights against certain liabilities that may arise out of performance of their duties to the Fund. The Fund has entered into a separate agreement with each Trustee that converts indemnification rights currently existing under the Fund’s organizational documents into contractual rights that cannot be changed in the future without the consent of the Trustee. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with service providers that contain a variety of indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent on future claims that may be made against the Fund and, therefore, cannot be estimated.
10. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
In August 2018, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 updates the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Management has adopted this guidance which did not have a material impact on the financial statements.
11. CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization announced that it had made the assessment that coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) is a pandemic. The impacts of COVID-19 are affecting the entire global economy, individual companies and investment products, the funds, and the market in general. There is significant uncertainty around the extent and duration of business disruptions related to COVID-19 and the impacts may last for an extended period of time. COVID-19 has led to significant uncertainty and volatility in the financial markets.
12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
At a meeting held July 15, 2021, the Board of Trustees of the Wells Fargo Funds approved a change in the Fund's name to remove “Wells Fargo” from the Fund's name and replace with “Allspring”. The change is expected to go into effect on October 11, 2021.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) announced that it will be changing its company name to Allspring Global Investments upon the closing of the previously announced sale transaction of WFAM by Wells Fargo & Company to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. The new corporate name is expected to go into effect on the closing date of the transaction, which is anticipated to occur in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
Following the closing of the transaction, Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the Fund's investment manager, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, each sub-advisers to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Fund's principal underwriter, will each be rebranded as Allspring.

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund  |  25


Report of independent registered public accounting firm
To the Shareholders of the Fund and Board of Trustees
Wells Fargo Funds Trust:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund (the Fund), one of the funds constituting Wells Fargo Funds Trust, including the portfolio of investments, as of May 31, 2021, the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the financial statements) and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended. In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of May 31, 2021, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Fund in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and financial highlights, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. Such procedures also included confirmation of securities owned as of May 31, 2021, by correspondence with the transfer agent. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and financial highlights. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have not been able to determine the specific year that we began serving as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies; however, we are aware that we have served as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies since at least 1955.
Boston, Massachusetts
July 28, 2021

26  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Common stocks:  98.93%          
Communication services:  3.18%          
Diversified telecommunication services: 1.28%           
Bandwidth Incorporated Class A         103,200 $ 12,207,528
Interactive media & services: 0.63%           
EverQuote Incorporated Class A         192,487   6,069,115
Media: 1.27%           
Cardlytics Incorporated         114,165  12,164,281
Consumer discretionary:  18.15%          
Auto components: 1.49%           
Fox Factory Holding Corporation          91,753  14,265,756
Hotels, restaurants & leisure: 3.03%           
Bally's Corporation          47,121   2,734,432
Papa John's International Incorporated         117,025  10,994,499
Wingstop Incorporated         107,038  15,272,182
           29,001,113
Household durables: 1.09%           
Purple Innovation Incorporated         366,242  10,445,222
Internet & direct marketing retail: 2.17%           
CarParts.com Incorporated         263,015   4,297,665
Fiverr International Limited          48,936  10,047,050
The RealReal Incorporated         367,500   6,420,225
           20,764,940
Leisure products: 1.71%           
YETI Holdings Incorporated       186,970 16,378,572
Specialty retail: 5.36%           
Boot Barn Holdings Incorporated       282,055 21,546,181
Cricut Incorporated Class A       163,216 5,511,804
Figs Incorporated Class A       95,573 3,263,818
Leslie's Incorporated       254,309 7,415,650
Lithia Motors Incorporated Class A       34,762 12,235,876
Petco Health & Wellness Company †«       58,570 1,326,611
          51,299,940
Textiles, apparel & luxury goods: 3.30%           
Crocs Incorporated       238,355 24,131,060
Deckers Outdoor Corporation       22,418 7,519,894
          31,650,954
Consumer staples:  4.86%          
Beverages: 1.40%           
Celsius Holdings Incorporated       204,000 13,370,160
Food & staples retailing: 0.53%           
The Chef's Warehouse Incorporated       165,465 5,089,703
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio  |  27


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Food products: 2.63%           
Freshpet Incorporated         111,333 $  19,685,901
Vital Farms Incorporated         259,556   5,525,947
           25,211,848
Personal products: 0.30%           
Honest Company         181,806   2,868,899
Financials:  5.01%          
Capital markets: 1.74%           
Assetmark Financial Holdings          36,309     946,213
Stifel Financial Corporation         225,971  15,655,271
           16,601,484
Diversified financial services: 0.50%           
Hudson Executive Investment Corporation Class A         266,500   2,643,680
VPC Impact Acquisition Holdings †«         211,900   2,161,380
            4,805,060
Insurance: 2.77%           
Goosehead Insurance Incorporated Class A          92,351   8,299,584
Kinsale Capital Group Incorporated         109,578  18,240,354
           26,539,938
Health care:  28.78%          
Biotechnology: 8.46%           
Arcutis Biotherapeutics Incorporated         421,886  11,116,696
Arena Pharmaceuticals Incorporated          56,502   3,452,837
Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company          41,371   3,599,277
CareDx Incorporated       132,083 10,619,473
Fate Therapeutics Incorporated       42,597 3,262,930
Halozyme Therapeutics Incorporated       288,945 11,965,212
Natera Incorporated       124,188 11,691,058
Vericel Corporation       448,173 25,321,775
          81,029,258
Health care equipment & supplies: 9.00%           
iRhythm Technologies Incorporated       73,283 5,529,935
Neuronetics Incorporated       210,071 2,850,663
Orthopediatrics Corporation       186,666 10,544,762
Outset Medical Incorporated       124,626 6,015,697
Pulmonx Corporation       103,464 4,440,675
Shockwave Medical Incorporated       172,310 30,998,569
SI-BONE Incorporated       398,553 12,024,344
Silk Road Medical Incorporated       70,399 3,419,983
Tandem Diabetes Care Incorporated       59,235 5,058,077
Vapotherm Incorporated       266,322 5,267,849
          86,150,554
Health care providers & services: 3.49%           
Accolade Incorporated       115,800 5,846,742
Addus Homecare Corporation       109,886 10,567,737
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

28  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Health care providers & services (continued)          
Castle Biosciences Incorporated         243,276 $  14,579,531
Privia Health Group Incorporated          73,587   2,408,503
           33,402,513
Health care technology: 2.88%           
Inspire Medical Systems Incorporated          73,509  14,282,799
Phreesia Incorporated         268,273  13,279,514
           27,562,313
Life sciences tools & services: 3.10%           
Akoya Biosciences Incorporated         105,361   2,193,616
Codexis Incorporated         729,237  14,949,359
Neogenomics Incorporated         306,344  12,569,294
           29,712,269
Pharmaceuticals: 1.85%           
Pacira Pharmaceuticals Incorporated         207,280  12,575,678
Revance Therapeutics Incorporated         173,620   5,140,888
           17,716,566
Industrials:  12.73%          
Aerospace & defense: 1.02%           
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions Incorporated         341,670   8,545,167
Mercury Systems Incorporated          18,956   1,240,670
            9,785,837
Building products: 0.39%           
The AZEK Company Incorporated          84,937   3,697,308
Commercial services & supplies: 1.88%           
Casella Waste Systems Incorporated Class A       266,991 18,003,203
Construction & engineering: 0.69%           
Construction Partners Incorporated Class A       205,200 6,609,492
Electrical equipment: 0.42%           
Bloom Energy Corporation Class A       164,635 3,979,228
Machinery: 2.41%           
Rexnord Corporation       460,994 23,035,870
Professional services: 3.12%           
ASGN Incorporated       290,096 29,905,997
Road & rail: 1.59%           
Saia Incorporated       66,166 15,228,767
Trading companies & distributors: 1.21%           
SiteOne Landscape Supply Incorporated       67,447 11,603,582
Information technology:  25.03%          
Electronic equipment, instruments & components: 2.52%           
Novanta Incorporated       145,122 20,167,604
Par Technology Corporation       59,300 3,970,728
          24,138,332
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio  |  29


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
IT services: 3.83%           
Endava plc Sponsored ADR         139,219 $  14,281,085
EVO Payments Incorporated Class A         589,212  16,875,032
Flywire Corporation          98,105   3,368,926
Paymentus Holdings Incorporated A          71,034   2,166,537
           36,691,580
Semiconductors & semiconductor equipment: 4.53%           
Allegro MicroSystems Incorporated         332,757   8,721,561
Diodes Incorporated         165,936  12,556,377
Semtech Corporation         199,151  12,546,513
Silicon Laboratories Incorporated          28,759   3,927,329
Skywater Technology Incorporated         214,258   5,579,278
           43,331,058
Software: 14.15%           
8x8 Incorporated         364,400   8,581,620
ACV Auctions Incorporated Class A         108,350   2,808,432
Alkami Technology Incorporated          18,927     629,701
Envestnet Incorporated          67,672   4,870,354
Everbridge Incorporated          57,526   6,759,305
Jamf Holding Corporation         170,593   5,916,165
Olo Incorporated Class A          23,547     797,066
ON24 Incorporated          59,270   1,907,309
Q2 Holdings Incorporated         234,685  22,278,647
Rapid7 Incorporated         309,455  25,885,911
Sprout Social Incorporated Class A       251,981 17,492,521
SPS Commerce Incorporated       205,276 19,267,205
Talend SA ADR       57,358 3,726,549
Viant Technology †«       57,526 1,679,184
Workiva Incorporated       136,105 12,916,365
          135,516,334
Real estate:  0.69%          
Equity REITs: 0.69%           
QTS Realty Trust Incorporated Class A       104,650 6,632,717
Utilities:  0.50%          
Independent power & renewable electricity producers: 0.50%           
Sunnova Energy International Incorporated       163,257 4,767,104
Total Common stocks (Cost $511,858,727)         947,234,395
    
    Yield      
Short-term investments:  1.39%          
Investment companies:  1.39%          
Securities Lending Cash Investments LLC ♠∩∞   0.03%   3,883,200   3,883,200
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class ♠∞   0.03   9,477,635   9,477,635
Total Short-term investments (Cost $13,360,835)          13,360,835
Total investments in securities (Cost $525,219,562) 100.32%       960,595,230
Other assets and liabilities, net (0.32)        (3,073,067)
Total net assets 100.00%       $957,522,163
    
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

30  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

Non-income-earning security
« All or a portion of this security is on loan.
The issuer is an affiliate of the Portfolio as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The investment is a non-registered investment company purchased with cash collateral received from securities on loan.
The rate represents the 7-day annualized yield at period end.
    
Abbreviations:
ADR American depositary receipt
REIT Real estate investment trust
Investments in affiliates
An affiliated investment is an investment in which the Portfolio owns at least 5% of the outstanding voting shares of the issuer or as a result of other relationships, such as the Portfolio and the issuer having the same adviser or investment manager. Transactions with issuers that were either affiliates of the Portfolio at the beginning of the period or the end of the period were as follows:
  Value,
beginning of
period
Purchases Sales
proceeds
Net
realized
gains
(losses)
  Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses)
  Value,
end of
period
  % of
net
assets
Shares,
end
of period
Income
from
affiliated
securities
Short-term investments                        
Investment companies                        
Securities Lending Cash Investments LLC $ 0 $187,539,904 $(183,656,704) $0   $0   $ 3,883,200     3,883,200 $ 14,813#
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class 10,065,569 252,271,839 (252,859,773) 0   0   9,477,635     9,477,635 3,477
        $0   $0   $13,360,835   1.39%   $18,290
    
# Amount shown represents income before fees and rebates.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio  |  31


Statement of assets and liabilities—May 31, 2021
   
Assets  
Investments in unaffiliated securities (including $3,779,040 of securities loaned), at value (cost $511,858,727)

$ 947,234,395
Investments in affiliated securites, at value (cost $13,360,835)

13,360,835
Cash

1,468,432
Receivable for investments sold

3,659,405
Receivable for dividends

103,124
Receivable for securities lending income, net

3,134
Prepaid expenses and other assets

5,752
Total assets

965,835,077
Liabilities  
Payable upon receipt of securities loaned

3,883,200
Payable for investments purchased

3,788,097
Advisory fee payable

630,498
Accrued expenses and other liabilities

11,119
Total liabilities

8,312,914
Total net assets

$957,522,163
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

32  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio


Statement of operations—year ended May 31, 2021
   
Investment income  
Dividends

$ 1,043,411
Securities lending income from affiliates, net

258,746
Income from affiliated securities

3,477
Total investment income

1,305,634
Expenses  
Advisory fee

6,904,496
Custody and accounting fees

58,388
Professional fees

45,612
Interest holder report expenses

7,237
Trustees’ fees and expenses

19,195
Other fees and expenses

31,885
Total expenses

7,066,813
Net investment loss

(5,761,179)
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments  
Net realized gains on investments

181,278,904
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

176,777,300
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

358,056,204
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

$352,295,025
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio  |  33


Statement of changes in net assets
     
  Year ended
May 31, 2021
Year ended
May 31, 2020
Operations    
Net investment loss

$ (5,761,179) $ (4,861,375)
Net realized gains on investments

181,278,904 95,687,152
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

176,777,300 7,683,217
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

352,295,025 98,508,994
Capital transactions    
Transactions in investors’ beneficial interests    
Contributions

97,803,647 65,548,053
Withdrawals

(215,997,204) (260,126,766)
Net decrease in net assets resulting from capital transactions

(118,193,557) (194,578,713)
Total increase (decrease) in net assets

234,101,468 (96,069,719)
Net assets    
Beginning of period

723,420,695 819,490,414
End of period

$ 957,522,163 $ 723,420,695
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

34  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio


Financial highlights
  Year ended May 31
  2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Total return

53.94% 15.49% (0.28)% 33.60% 23.97%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)          
Gross expenses

0.81% 0.81% 0.81% 0.81% 0.81%
Net expenses

0.81% 0.81% 0.81% 0.81% 0.81%
Net investment loss

(0.66)% (0.62)% (0.57)% (0.47)% (0.15)%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate

48% 55% 71% 47% 115%
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio  |  35


Notes to financial statements
1. ORGANIZATION
Wells Fargo Master Trust (the "Trust"), a Delaware statutory trust organized on March 10, 1999, is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). As an investment company, the Trust follows the accounting and reporting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, Financial Services – Investment Companies. These financial statements report on the Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio (the "Portfolio") which is a diversified series of the Trust.
Interests in the Portfolio are available solely through private placement transactions that do not involve any "public offering" within the meaning of Section 4(2) of the Investment Company Act of 1933.
On February 23, 2021, Wells Fargo & Company announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management ("WFAM") to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. WFAM is the trade name used by the asset management businesses of Wells Fargo & Company and includes Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the adviser to the Portfolio, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, both registered investment advisers providing sub-advisory services to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Portfolio's principal underwriter. As part of the transaction, Wells Fargo & Company will own a 9.9% equity interest and will continue to serve as an important client and distribution partner.
Consummation of the transaction will result in the automatic termination of the Portfolio's advisory agreement and subadvisory agreement. The Portfolio's Board of Trustees approved a new advisory and new subadvisory agreement and approved submitting the agreements to the Portfolio’s interest holders for approval at a special meeting of interest holders expected to be held on August 16, 2021. Interest holders of record of the Portfolio at the close of business on May 28, 2021 are entitled to vote at the meeting. If interest holders approve the new agreements, they would take effect upon the closing of the transaction. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following significant accounting policies, which are consistently followed in the preparation of the financial statements of the Portfolio, are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Securities valuation
All investments are valued each business day as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4 p.m. Eastern Time), although the Portfolio may deviate from this calculation time under unusual or unexpected circumstances.
Equity securities that are listed on a foreign or domestic exchange or market are valued at the official closing price or, if none, the last sales price. If no sale occurs on the principal exchange or market that day, a fair value price will be determined in accordance with the Portfolio’s Valuation Procedures.
Investments in registered open-end investment companies are valued at net asset value. Interests in non-registered investment companies that are redeemable at net asset value are fair valued normally at net asset value.
Investments which are not valued using any of the methods discussed above are valued at their fair value, as determined in good faith by the Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees has established a Valuation Committee comprised of the Trustees and has delegated to it the authority to take any actions regarding the valuation of portfolio securities that the Valuation Committee deems necessary or appropriate, including determining the fair value of portfolio securities, unless the determination has been delegated to the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee at Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC ("Funds Management"). The Board of Trustees retains the authority to make or ratify any valuation decisions or approve any changes to the Valuation Procedures as it deems appropriate. On a quarterly basis, the Board of Trustees receives reports on any valuation actions taken by the Valuation Committee or the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee which may include items for ratification.
Securities lending
The Portfolio may lend its securities from time to time in order to earn additional income in the form of fees or interest on securities received as collateral or the investment of any cash received as collateral. When securities are on loan, the Portfolio receives interest or dividends on those securities. Cash collateral received in connection with its securities lending transactions is invested in Securities Lending Cash Investments, LLC (the "Securities Lending Fund"). Investments in Securities Lending Fund

36  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio


Notes to financial statements
are valued at the evaluated bid price provided by an independent pricing service. Income earned from investment in the Securities Lending Fund, if any, is included in securities lending income from affiliates (net of fees and rebates) on the Statement of Operations.
In a securities lending transaction, the net asset value of the Portfolio is affected by an increase or decrease in the value of the securities loaned and by an increase or decrease in the value of the instrument in which collateral is invested. The amount of securities lending activity undertaken by the Portfolio fluctuates from time to time. The Portfolio has the right under the lending agreement to recover the securities from the borrower on demand. In the event of default or bankruptcy by the borrower, the Portfolio may be prevented from recovering the loaned securities or gaining access to the collateral or may experience delays or costs in doing so. In such an event, the terms of the agreement allow the unaffiliated securities lending agent to use the collateral to purchase replacement securities on behalf of the Portfolio or pay the Portfolio the market value of the loaned securities. The Portfolio bears the risk of loss with respect to depreciation of its investment of the cash collateral.
Security transactions and income recognition
Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains or losses are recorded on the basis of identified cost.
Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date.
Federal and other taxes
The Portfolio is not required to pay federal income taxes on its net investment income and net capital gains as it is treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. All income, gains and losses of the Portfolio are deemed to have been “passed through” to the interest holders in proportion to their holdings of the Portfolio regardless of whether income and gains have been distributed by the Portfolio.
The Portfolio’s income tax returns and all financial records supporting those returns for the prior three fiscal years are subject to examination by the federal revenue authority. Management has analyzed the Portfolio’s tax positions taken on federal, state, and foreign tax returns for all open tax years and does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability.
As of May 31, 2021, the aggregate cost of all investments for federal income tax purposes was $528,656,214 and the unrealized gains (losses) consisted of:
Gross unrealized gains $453,686,146
Gross unrealized losses (21,747,130)
Net unrealized gains $431,939,016
3. FAIR VALUATION MEASUREMENTS
Fair value measurements of investments are determined within a framework that has established a fair value hierarchy based upon the various data inputs utilized in determining the value of the Portfolio’s investments. The three-level hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The Portfolio’s investments are classified within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The inputs are summarized into three broad levels as follows:
Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical securities
Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Portfolio’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs or methodologies used for valuing investments in securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio  |  37


Notes to financial statements
The following is a summary of the inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s assets and liabilities as of May 31, 2021:
  Quoted prices
(Level 1)
Other significant
observable inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
unobservable inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Assets        
Investments in:        
Common stocks        
Communication services $ 30,440,924 $0 $0 $ 30,440,924
Consumer discretionary 173,806,497 0 0 173,806,497
Consumer staples 46,540,610 0 0 46,540,610
Financials 47,946,482 0 0 47,946,482
Health care 275,573,473 0 0 275,573,473
Industrials 121,849,284 0 0 121,849,284
Information technology 239,677,304 0 0 239,677,304
Real estate 6,632,717 0 0 6,632,717
Utilities 4,767,104 0 0 4,767,104
Short-term investments        
Investment companies 13,360,835 0 0 13,360,835
Total assets $960,595,230 $0 $0 $960,595,230
Additional sector, industry or geographic detail, if any, is included in the Portfolio of Investments.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the Portfolio did not have any transfers into/out of Level 3.
4. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
Advisory fee
The Trust has entered into an advisory contract with Funds Management, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company ("Wells Fargo"). The adviser is responsible for implementing investment policies and guidelines and for supervising the subadviser, who is responsible for day-to-day portfolio management of the Portfolio. Pursuant to the contract, Funds Management is entitled to receive an advisory fee at the following annual rate based on the Portfolio’s average daily net assets:
Average daily net assets Advisory fee
First $500 million 0.800%
Next $500 million 0.775
Next $1 billion 0.750
Next $1 billion 0.725
Next $1 billion 0.700
Over $4 billion 0.680
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the advisory fee was equivalent to an annual rate of 0.79% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets.
Funds Management has retained the services of a subadviser to provide daily portfolio management to the Portfolio. The fee for subadvisory services is borne by Funds Management. Wells Capital Management Incorporated ("Wellscap"), an affiliate of Funds Management and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo, is the subadviser to the Portfolio and is entitled to receive a fee from Funds Management at an annual rate starting at 0.55% and declining to 0.40% as the average daily net assets of the Portfolio increase.
Interfund transactions
The Portfolio may purchase or sell portfolio investment securities to certain other Wells Fargo affiliates pursuant to Rule 17a-7 under the 1940 Act and under procedures adopted by the Board of Trustees. The procedures have been designed to ensure that these interfund transactions, which do not incur broker commissions, are effected at current market prices.

38  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio


Notes to financial statements
5. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS
Purchases and sales of investments, excluding U.S. government obligations (if any) and short-term securities, for the year ended May 31, 2021 were $409,168,781 and $524,644,429, respectively.
6. SECURITIES LENDING TRANSACTIONS
The Portfolio lends its securities through an unaffiliated securities lending agent and receives collateral in the form of cash or securities with a value at least equal to the value of the securities on loan. The value of the loaned securities is determined at the close of each business day and any increases or decreases in the required collateral are exchanged between the Portfolio and the counterparty on the next business day. Cash collateral received is invested in the Securities Lending Fund which seeks to provide a positive return compared to the daily Federal Funds Open Rate by investing in high-quality, U.S. dollar-denominated short-term money market instruments and is exempt from registration under Section 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act. Securities Lending Fund is managed by Funds Management and is subadvised by WellsCap. Funds Management receives an advisory fee starting at 0.05% and declining to 0.01% as the average daily net assets of the Securities Lending Fund increase. All of the fees received by Funds Management are paid to WellsCap for its services as subadviser.
In the event of counterparty default or the failure of a borrower to return a loaned security, the Portfolio has the right to use the collateral to offset any losses incurred. As of May 31, 2021, the Portfolio had securities lending transactions with the following counterparties which are subject to offset:
Counterparty Value of
securities on
loan
Collateral
received1
Net amount
JPMorgan Securities LLC $1,270,665 $(1,270,665) $0
Morgan Stanley & Company LLC 867,195 (867,195) 0
UBS Securities LLC 1,641,180 (1,641,180) 0
1 Collateral received within this table is limited to the collateral for the net transaction with the counterparty.
7. BANK BORROWINGS
The Trust, along with Wells Fargo Variable Trust and Wells Fargo Funds Trust (excluding the money market funds), are parties to a $350,000,000 revolving credit agreement whereby the Portfolio is permitted to use bank borrowings for temporary or emergency purposes, such as to fund interest holders withdrawal requests. Interest under the credit agreement is charged to the Portfolio based on a borrowing rate equal to the higher of the Federal Funds rate in effect on that day plus 1.25% or the overnight LIBOR rate in effect on that day plus 1.25%. In addition, an annual commitment fee equal to 0.25% of the unused balance is allocated to each participating fund.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, there were no borrowings by the Portfolio under the agreement.
8. CONCENTRATION RISKS
As of the end of the period, the Portfolio concentrated its portfolio of investments in the health care and information technology sectors. A fund that invests a substantial portion of its assets in any sector may be more affected by changes in that sector than would be a fund whose investments are not heavily weighted in any sector.
9. INDEMNIFICATION
Under the Portfolio's organizational documents, the officers and Trustees have been granted certain indemnification rights against certain liabilities that may arise out of performance of their duties to the Portfolio. The Portfolio has entered into a separate agreement with each Trustee that converts indemnification rights currently existing under the Portfolio’s organizational documents into contractual rights that cannot be changed in the future without the consent of the Trustee. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Portfolio may enter into contracts with service providers that contain a variety of indemnification clauses. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent on future claims that may be made against the Portfolio and, therefore, cannot be estimated.
10. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
In August 2018, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 updates the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. The amendments are effective for fiscal years,

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio  |  39


Notes to financial statements
and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Management has adopted this guidance which did not have a material impact on the financial statements.
11. CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization announced that it had made the assessment that coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) is a pandemic. The impacts of COVID-19 are affecting the entire global economy, individual companies and investment products, the funds, and the market in general. There is significant uncertainty around the extent and duration of business disruptions related to COVID-19 and the impacts may last for an extended period of time. COVID-19 has led to significant uncertainty and volatility in the financial markets.
12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
At a meeting held July 15, 2021, the Board of Trustees of the Wells Fargo Funds approved a change in the Portfolio's name to remove “Wells Fargo” from the Portfolio's name and replace with “Allspring”. The change is expected to go into effect on October 11, 2021.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) announced that it will be changing its company name to Allspring Global Investments upon the closing of the previously announced sale transaction of WFAM by Wells Fargo & Company to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. The new corporate name is expected to go into effect on the closing date of the transaction, which is anticipated to occur in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
Following the closing of the transaction, Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the Portfolio's investment adviser, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, each sub-advisers to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC will each be rebranded as Allspring.

40  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio


Report of independent registered public accounting firm
To the Interest Holders of the Portfolio and Board of Trustees
Wells Fargo Master Trust:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio (the Portfolio), one of the portfolios constituting Wells Fargo Master Trust, including the portfolio of investments, as of May 31, 2021, the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the financial statements) and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Portfolio as of May 31, 2021, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Portfolio in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and financial highlights, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. Such procedures also included confirmation of securities owned as of May 31, 2021, by correspondence with the custodian, transfer agent and brokers, or by other appropriate auditing procedures. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and financial highlights. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have not been able to determine the specific year that we began serving as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies; however, we are aware that we have served as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies since at least 1955.
Boston, Massachusetts
July 28, 2021

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio  |  41


Other information (unaudited)
TAX INFORMATION
For corporate shareholders, pursuant to Section 854 of the Internal Revenue Code, 6% of ordinary income dividends qualify for the corporate dividends-received deduction for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 852 of the Internal Revenue Code, $143,589,213 was designated as a 20% rate gain distribution for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 854 of the Internal Revenue Code, $679,467 of income dividends paid during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 has been designated as qualified dividend income (QDI).
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, $11,568,904 has been designated as short-term capital gain dividends for nonresident alien shareholders pursuant to Section 871 of the Internal Revenue Code.
PROXY VOTING INFORMATION
A description of the policies and procedures used to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-222-8222, visiting our website at wfam.com, or visiting the SEC website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the proxies related to portfolio securities were voted during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the website at wfam.com or by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS INFORMATION
The Fund and Portfolio file their complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year as an exhibit to their reports on Form N-PORT. Shareholders and Interest holders may view the filed Form N-PORT by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov.

42  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio


Other information (unaudited)
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS
Each of the Trustees and Officers listed in the table below acts in identical capacities for each fund in the Wells Fargo family of funds, which consists of 139 mutual funds comprising the Wells Fargo Funds Trust, Wells Fargo Variable Trust, Wells Fargo Master Trust and four closed-end funds (collectively the “Fund Complex”). This table should be read in conjunction with the Prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information1. The mailing address of each Trustee and Officer is 525 Market Street, 12th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105. Each Trustee and Officer serves an indefinite term, however, each Trustee serves such term until reaching the mandatory retirement age established by the Trustees.
Independent Trustees
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service*
Principal occupations during past five years or longer Current other
public company or
investment
company
directorships
William R. Ebsworth
(Born 1957)
Trustee,
since 2015
Retired. From 1984 to 2013, equities analyst, portfolio manager, research director and chief investment officer at Fidelity Management and Research Company in Boston, Tokyo, and Hong Kong, and retired in 2013 as Chief Investment Officer of Fidelity Strategic Advisers, Inc. where he led a team of investment professionals managing client assets. Prior thereto, Board member of Hong Kong Securities Clearing Co., Hong Kong Options Clearing Corp., the Thailand International Fund, Ltd., Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company, and Empire Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company. Audit Committee Chair and Investment Committee Chair of the Vincent Memorial Hospital Endowment (non-profit organization). Mr. Ebsworth is a CFA® charterholder. N/A
Jane A. Freeman
(Born 1953)
Trustee,
since 2015;
Chair Liaison,
since 2018
Retired. From 2012 to 2014 and 1999 to 2008, Chief Financial Officer of Scientific Learning Corporation. From 2008 to 2012, Ms. Freeman provided consulting services related to strategic business projects. Prior to 1999, Portfolio Manager at Rockefeller & Co. and Scudder, Stevens & Clark. Board member of the Harding Loevner Funds from 1996 to 2014, serving as both Lead Independent Director and chair of the Audit Committee. Board member of the Russell Exchange Traded Funds Trust from 2011 to 2012 and the chair of the Audit Committee. Ms. Freeman is also an inactive Chartered Financial Analyst. N/A
Isaiah Harris, Jr.
(Born 1952)
Trustee,
since 2009; Audit
Committee
Chair,
since 2019
Retired. Chairman of the Board of CIGNA Corporation since 2009, and Director since 2005. From 2003 to 2011, Director of Deluxe Corporation. Prior thereto, President and CEO of BellSouth Advertising and Publishing Corp. from 2005 to 2007, President and CEO of BellSouth Enterprises from 2004 to 2005 and President of BellSouth Consumer Services from 2000 to 2003. Emeritus member of the Iowa State University Foundation Board of Governors. Emeritus Member of the Advisory Board of Iowa State University School of Business. Advisory Board Member, Palm Harbor Academy (private school). Mr. Harris is a certified public accountant (inactive status). CIGNA Corporation
Judith M. Johnson
(Born 1949)
Trustee,
since 2008
Retired. Prior thereto, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund from 1996 to 2008. Ms. Johnson is an attorney, certified public accountant and a certified managerial accountant. N/A
David F. Larcker
(Born 1950)
Trustee,
since 2009
James Irvin Miller Professor of Accounting at the Graduate School of Business (Emeritus), Stanford University, Director of the Corporate Governance Research Initiative and Senior Faculty of The Rock Center for Corporate Governance since 2006. From 2005 to 2008, Professor of Accounting at the Graduate School of Business, Stanford University. Prior thereto, Ernst & Young Professor of Accounting at The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania from 1985 to 2005. N/A

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio  |  43


Other information (unaudited)
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service*
Principal occupations during past five years or longer Current other
public company or
investment
company
directorships
Olivia S. Mitchell
(Born 1953)
Trustee,
since 2006;
Nominating and
Governance
Committee Chair,
since 2018
International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans Professor, Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania since 1993. Director of Wharton’s Pension Research Council and Boettner Center on Pensions & Retirement Research, and Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. Previously, Cornell University Professor from 1978 to 1993. N/A
Timothy J. Penny
(Born 1951)
Trustee,
since 1996;
Chair,
since 2018
President and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Minnesota Initiative Foundation, a non-profit organization, since 2007. Member of the Board of Trustees of NorthStar Education Finance, Inc., a non-profit organization, since 2007. N/A
James G. Polisson
(Born 1959)
Trustee,
since 2018
Retired. Chief Marketing Officer, Source (ETF) UK Services, Ltd, from 2015 to 2017. From 2012 to 2015, Principal of The Polisson Group, LLC, a management consulting, corporate advisory and principal investing company. Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director at Russell Investments, Global Exchange Traded Funds from 2010 to 2012. Managing Director of Barclays Global Investors from 1998 to 2010 and Global Chief Marketing Officer for iShares and Barclays Global Investors from 2000 to 2010. Trustee of the San Francisco Mechanics’ Institute, a non-profit organization, from 2013 to 2015. Board member of the Russell Exchange Traded Fund Trust from 2011 to 2012. Director of Barclays Global Investors Holdings Deutschland GmbH from 2006 to 2009. Mr. Polisson is an attorney and has a retired status with the Massachusetts and District of Columbia Bar Associations. N/A
Pamela Wheelock
(Born 1959)
Trustee,
since January
2020; previously
Trustee from
January 2018 to
July 2019
Board member of the Destination Medical Center Economic Development Agency, Rochester, Minnesota since 2019. Interim President of the McKnight Foundation from January to September 2020. Acting Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Human Services, July 2019 through September 2019. Human Services Manager (part-time), Minnesota Department of Human Services, October 2019 through December 2019. Chief Operating Officer, Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity from 2017 to 2019. Vice President of University Services, University of Minnesota from 2012 to 2016. Prior thereto, on the Board of Directors, Governance Committee and Finance Committee for the Minnesota Philanthropy Partners (Saint Paul Foundation) from 2012 to 2018, Interim Chief Executive Officer of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota from 2011 to 2012, Chairman of the Board from 2009 to 2012 and Board Director from 2003 to 2015. Vice President, Leadership and Community Engagement, Bush Foundation, Saint Paul, Minnesota (a private foundation) from 2009 to 2011. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Minnesota Sports and Entertainment from 2004 to 2009 and Senior Vice President from 2002 to 2004. Executive Vice President of the Minnesota Wild Foundation from 2004 to 2008. Commissioner of Finance, State of Minnesota, from 1999 to 2002. Currently Board Chair of the Minnesota Wild Foundation since 2010. N/A
*  Length of service dates reflect the Trustee’s commencement of service with the Trust’s predecessor entities, where applicable.

44  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio


Other information (unaudited)
Officers
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service
Principal occupations during past five years or longer
Andrew Owen
(Born 1960)
President,
since 2017
Executive Vice President of Wells Fargo & Company and Head of Affiliated Managers, Wells Fargo Asset Management, since 2014. In addition, Mr. Owen is currently President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC since 2017. Prior thereto, Executive Vice President responsible for marketing, investments and product development for Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, from 2009 to 2014.
Jeremy DePalma
(Born 1974)
Treasurer,
since 2012
(for certain funds in
the Fund Complex);
since 2021 (for
the remaining funds in the
Fund Complex)
Senior Vice President of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC since 2009. Senior Vice President of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC from 2008 to 2010 and head of the Fund Reporting and Control Team within Fund Administration from 2005 to 2010.
Michelle Rhee
(Born 1966)
Chief Legal Officer,
since 2019
Secretary of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC and Chief Legal Counsel of Wells Fargo Asset Management since 2018. Deputy General Counsel of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. since 2020 and Assistant General Counsel of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. from 2018 to 2020. Associate General Counsel and Managing Director of Bank of America Corporation from 2004 to 2018.
Catherine Kennedy
(Born 1969)
Secretary,
since 2019
Vice President of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC and Senior Counsel of the Wells Fargo Legal Department since 2010. Vice President and Senior Counsel of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC from 1998 to 2010.
Michael H. Whitaker
(Born 1967)
Chief Compliance Officer,
since 2016
Chief Compliance Officer of Wells Fargo Asset Management since 2016. Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer for Fidelity Investments from 2007 to 2016.
1  The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about the Trustees and is available, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-222-8222 or by visiting the website at wfam.com.

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio  |  45


Other information (unaudited)
LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
In accordance with Rule 22e-4 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Liquidity Rule”), Wells Fargo Funds Trust and Wells Fargo Master Trust (each a “Trust”) has adopted and implemented a liquidity risk management program (the “Program”) on behalf of each of its series, including the Fund and the Portfolio, which is reasonably designed to assess and manage the Fund’s or the Portfolio’s liquidity risk. “Liquidity risk” is defined under the Liquidity Rule as the risk that the Fund or Portfolio is unable to meet redemption requests without significantly diluting remaining investors’ interests in the Fund or Portfolio. Each Trust’s Board of Trustees (each a “Board”) previously approved the designation of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”), the Fund’s investment manager and the Portfolio’s investment adviser, as the administrator of the Program, and Funds Management has established a Liquidity Risk Management Council (the “Council”) composed of personnel from multiple departments within Funds Management and its affiliates to assist Funds Management in the implementation and on-going administration of the Program.
The Program is comprised of various components designed to support the assessment and/or management of liquidity risk, including: (1) the periodic assessment (no less frequently than annually) of certain factors that influence the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s liquidity risk; (2) the periodic classification (no less frequently than monthly) of the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s investments into one of four liquidity categories that reflect an estimate of their liquidity under current market conditions; (3) a 15% limit on the acquisition of “illiquid investments” (as defined under the Liquidity Rule); (4) to the extent the Fund or the Portfolio does not invest primarily in “highly liquid investments” (as defined under the Liquidity Rule), the determination of a minimum percentage of the Fund’s or the Portfolio’s assets that generally will be invested in highly liquid investments (an “HLIM”); (5) if the Fund or the Portfolio has established an HLIM, the periodic review (no less frequently than annually) of the HLIM and the adoption of policies and procedures for responding to a shortfall of the Fund’s or the Portfolio’s “highly liquid investments” below its HLIM; and (6) periodic reporting to the Board.
At a meeting of the Board held on May 17-19, 2021, the Board received and reviewed a written report (the “Report”) from Funds Management that addressed the operation of the Program and assessed its adequacy and effectiveness for the period from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 (the “Reporting Period”). Among other things, the Report discussed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on liquidity and management of liquidity risk during the Reporting Period, including during the stressed market conditions caused by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. No significant liquidity events impacting the Fund or the Portfolio were noted in the Report. As applicable to the Fund and the Portfolio, there were no material changes to the Program during the Reporting Period.
Funds Management concluded in the Report that the Program is operating effectively to assess and manage the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s liquidity risk, and that the Program has been and continues to be adequately and effectively implemented to monitor and, as applicable, respond to the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s liquidity developments.
There can be no assurance that the Program will achieve its objectives under all circumstances in the future. Please refer to the Fund’s prospectus for more information regarding the Fund’s exposure to liquidity risk and other risks to which an investment in the Fund may be subject.

46  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio


Board considerations (unaudited)
BOARD CONSIDERATION OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, ADVISORY AND SUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENTS:
Board Considerations – Current Agreements
Under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Board of Trustees (each, a “Board” and collectively, the “Boards”) of each of Wells Fargo Funds Trust (“Funds Trust”) and Wells Fargo Master Trust (“Master Trust”, and collectively, the “Trusts”) must determine annually whether to approve the continuation of the Trusts’ investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements, as applicable. In this regard, at a Board meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Meeting”), the Funds Trust Board, all the members of which have no direct or indirect interest in the investment management agreement and are not “interested persons” of the Trusts, as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), reviewed and approved for Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund (the “Gateway Fund”) an investment management agreement (the “Gateway Fund Management Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”).
At the Meeting, the Master Trust Board, all the members of which have no direct or indirect interest in the investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements and are Independent Trustees, reviewed and approved: (i) an investment advisory agreement (the “Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement”) with Funds Management for Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio, a portfolio of Master Trust (the “Master Portfolio”); and (ii) an investment sub-advisory agreement (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Wells Capital Management Incorporated (the “Sub-Adviser”), an affiliate of Funds Management, for the Master Portfolio.
The Gateway Fund and the Master Portfolio are collectively referred to as the “Funds.” The Gateway Fund Management Agreement, the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement are collectively referred to as the “Advisory Agreements.”
The Gateway Fund is a gateway feeder fund that invest substantially all of its assets in the Master Portfolio. The Master Portfolio has a substantially similar investment objective and substantially similar investment strategies to the Gateway Fund. Information provided to the Boards regarding the Gateway Fund is also applicable to the Master Portfolio, as relevant.
The Boards noted that Wells Fargo & Company recently announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”), which includes Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser, to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. and/or their affiliates (the “Transaction”). The Boards further noted that the Transaction would result in a change-of-control of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser, which would be considered to be an assignment that would result in the termination of the Advisory Agreements. In light of the Transaction, each Board separately considered for approval a new investment management agreement with Funds Management and, with respect to the Master Portfolio, the Master Trust Board considered for approval a new sub-advisory agreement with the Sub-Adviser (collectively, the “New Agreements”) that would replace the Advisory Agreements upon consummation of the Transaction, subject to approval of each respective New Agreement by each Fund’s shareholders. The Boards also considered for approval interim agreements to go into effect in the event shareholders do not approve the New Agreements before the Transaction is completed. The interim agreements would allow the Manager and the Sub-Adviser, as applicable, to continue providing services to the Funds while the Funds continue to seek shareholder approval of the New Agreements. The Boards noted that the terms of the interim agreements would be identical to those of the current Advisory Agreements, except for the term and certain escrow provisions.
At the Meeting, the Boards considered the factors and reached the conclusions described below relating to the selection of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser and the approval of the Advisory Agreements. Prior to the Meeting, including at Board meetings held in April and May 2021, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with representatives of Funds Management about these matters. Also, the Boards have adopted a team-based approach, with each team consisting of a sub-set of Trustees, to assist the full Boards in the discharge of their duties in reviewing investment performance and other matters throughout the year. The Independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Advisory Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately.
In providing information to the Boards, Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser were guided by a detailed set of requests for information submitted to them by independent legal counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees at the start of the Boards’ annual contract renewal process earlier in 2021. In considering and approving the Advisory Agreements, the Trustees considered the information they believed relevant, including but not limited to the information discussed below. The Boards considered not only the specific information presented in connection with the Meeting, but also the knowledge gained over time through interaction with Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser about various topics. In this regard, the Boards reviewed reports of Funds Management at each of their quarterly meetings, which included, among other things, portfolio reviews and investment performance reports. In addition, the Boards and the teams mentioned above confer with portfolio managers at various times throughout the year. The Boards did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each individual Trustee may have attributed different weights to various factors.

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund  |  47


Board considerations (unaudited)
After its deliberations, the Funds Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Gateway Fund Management Agreement for a one-year term. Additionally, after its deliberations, the Master Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement, each for a one-year term. The Boards considered the approval of the Advisory Agreements for the Funds as part of their consideration of agreements for funds across the complex, but their approvals were made on a fund-by-fund basis. The following summarizes a number of important, but not necessarily all, factors considered by the Boards in support of their approvals.
Nature, extent and quality of services
The Boards received and considered various information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser under the Advisory Agreements. This information included a description of the investment advisory services and Fund-level administrative services, as well as, among other things, a summary of the background and experience of senior management of WFAM, of which Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser are a part, and a summary of investments made in the business of WFAM. The Boards also received a description of Funds Management’s and the Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans, including a summary of the performance of such plans and any changes thereto during the COVID-19 pandemic, and of their approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity. The Boards also received and reviewed information about Funds Management’s role as administrator of the Funds’ liquidity risk management program, Funds Management’s approach to risk management, and Funds Management’s intermediary and vendor oversight program.
The Boards also considered the qualifications, background, tenure and responsibilities of each of the portfolio managers primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the Funds. The Boards evaluated the ability of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser to attract and retain qualified investment professionals, including research, advisory and supervisory personnel.
The Boards further considered the compliance programs and compliance records of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser. In addition, the Boards took into account the full range of services provided to the Funds by Funds Management and its affiliates. The Boards also considered information about retention and back-up arrangements that have been put into place with respect to key personnel of WFAM in connection with the anticipated Transaction, noting that WFAM provided assurances that the announcement and eventual culmination of the Transaction is not expected to result in any diminution in the nature or quality of services provided to the Funds.
Fund investment performance and expenses
The Boards considered the investment performance results for each of the Funds over various time periods ended December 31, 2020. The Boards considered these results in comparison to the investment performance of funds in a universe that was determined by Broadridge Inc. (“Broadridge”) to be similar to the Gateway Fund (the “Universe”), and in comparison to the Gateway Fund’s benchmark index and to other comparative data. Broadridge is an independent provider of investment company data. The Boards received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the performance Universe. The Funds Trust Board noted that the investment performance of the Gateway Fund (Administrator Class) was higher than the average investment performance of its Universe for the one-, three-, five- and ten-year periods ended December 31, 2020. The Funds Trust Board also noted that the investment performance of the Gateway Fund was higher than its benchmark, the Russell 2000® Growth Index, for all periods ended December 31, 2020.
The Master Trust Board took note of the investment performance of the Master Portfolio in the context of reviewing the investment performance of the Gateway Fund.
The Funds Trust Board also received and considered information regarding the Gateway Fund’s net operating expense ratios, which include fees and expenses of the Master Portfolio, and their various components, including actual management fees assessed at the Gateway Fund and Master Portfolio levels, custodian and other non-management fees, and Rule 12b-1 and non-Rule 12b-1 shareholder service fees. The Funds Trust Board considered these ratios in comparison to the median ratios of funds in class-specific expense groups that were determined by Broadridge to be similar to the Gateway Fund (the “Groups”). The Funds Trust Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the expense Groups and an explanation of how funds comprising expense groups and their expense ratios may vary from year-to-year. Based on the Broadridge reports, the Funds Trust Board noted that the net operating expense ratios of the Gateway Fund were lower than or in range of the median net operating expense ratios of its expense Groups for each share class.
With respect to the Master Portfolio, the Master Trust Board reviewed the fee rates that are payable to Funds Management for investment advisory services (as discussed below), which are the only fees charged at the Master Portfolio level, relative to a corresponding expense Group.

48  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
The Boards took into account the Funds’ investment performance and expense information provided to them among the factors considered in deciding to re-approve the Advisory Agreements.
Investment management, advisory and sub-advisory fee rates
The Funds Trust Board noted that Funds Management receives no advisory fees from the Gateway Fund as long as the Gateway Fund continues to invest all (or substantially all) of its assets in a single master portfolio. If the Gateway Fund were to change its investment structure so that it began investing in two or more master portfolios (a fund-of-funds), Funds Management would be entitled to receive an annual fee of 0.25% of the Gateway Fund’s average daily net assets for providing investment advisory services to the Gateway Fund, including allocating the Gateway Fund’s assets to the Master Portfolio.
The Funds Trust Board reviewed and considered the contractual fee rates that are payable by the Gateway Fund to Funds Management under the Gateway Fund Management Agreement for management services (other than investment advisory services), as well as the contractual fee rates payable by the Gateway Fund to Funds Management for class-level administrative services under a Class-Level Administration Agreement, which include, among other things, class-level transfer agency and sub-transfer agency costs (collectively, the “Management Rates”).
The Master Trust Board reviewed and considered the contractual investment advisory fee rate that is payable by the Master Portfolio to Funds Management for investment advisory services under the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement (the “Advisory Agreement Rate”). The Master Trust Board also reviewed and considered the contractual investment sub-advisory fee rate that is payable by Funds Management to the Sub-Adviser for investment sub-advisory services (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement Rate”).
Among other information reviewed by the Funds Trust Board was a comparison of the Gateway Fund’s Management Rate, which, for this purpose, includes the advisory fees paid at the Master Portfolio level, with the average contractual investment management fee rates of funds in the expense Groups at a common asset level as well as transfer agency costs of the funds in the expense Groups. The Funds Trust Board noted that the Management Rates of the Gateway Fund were lower than or in range of the sum of these average rates for the Gateway Fund’s expense Groups for each share class.
The Master Trust Board reviewed a comparison of the Advisory Agreement Rate of the Master Portfolio with those of other funds in the Master Portfolio’s expense Group at a common asset level. The Master Trust Board noted that the Advisory Agreement Rate of the Master Portfolio was lower than the median rate for the Master Portfolio’s expense Group.
The Master Trust Board also received and considered information about the portions of the total management fees that were retained by Funds Management after payment of the fees to the Sub-Adviser for sub-advisory services. In assessing the reasonableness of these amounts, the Master Trust Board received and evaluated information about the nature and extent of responsibilities retained and risks assumed by Funds Management and not delegated to or assumed by the Sub-Adviser, and about Funds Management’s on-going oversight services. Given the affiliation between Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser, the Master Trust Board ascribed limited relevance to the allocation of fees between them.
The Boards also received and considered information about the nature and extent of services offered and fee rates charged by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser to other types of clients with investment strategies similar to those of the Funds. In this regard, the Boards received information about the significantly greater scope of services, and compliance, reporting and other legal burdens and risks of managing proprietary mutual funds compared with those associated with managing assets of other types of clients, including third-party sub-advised fund clients and non-mutual fund clients such as institutional separate accounts.
Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Funds Trust Board determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the Gateway Fund Management Agreement was reasonable, and the Master Trust Board determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and to the Sub-Adviser under the Sub-Advisory Agreement was reasonable.
Profitability
The Boards received and considered information concerning the profitability of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo & Co. (“Wells Fargo”) from providing services to the fund family as a whole. The Boards noted that the Sub-Adviser’s profitability information with respect to providing services to the Master Portfolio and other funds in the family was subsumed in the WFAM and Wells Fargo profitability analysis.
Funds Management reported on the methodologies and estimates used in calculating profitability, including a description of the methodology used to allocate certain expenses. Among other things, the Boards noted that the levels of profitability reported on a fund-by-fund basis varied widely, depending on factors such as the size, type and age of fund. Based on its review, the Boards did

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund  |  49


Board considerations (unaudited)
not deem the profits reported by Funds Management, WFAM or Wells Fargo from services provided to the Funds to be at a level that would prevent the Boards from approving the continuation of the Advisory Agreements.
Economies of scale
The Boards received and considered information about the potential for Funds Management to experience economies of scale in the provision of management services to the Funds, the difficulties of calculating economies of scale at an individual fund level, and the extent to which potential scale benefits are shared with shareholders of the Funds. The Boards noted the existence of breakpoints in the Master Portfolio’s advisory fee structure and the Gateway Fund’s management fee structure, which operate generally to reduce the Funds’ expense ratios as the Funds grow in size, and the size of the Master Portfolio and the Gateway Fund, respectively, in relation to such breakpoints. The Boards considered that, in addition to advisory fee and management fee breakpoints, Funds Management shares potential economies of scale from its management business in a variety of ways, including through fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangements, competitive management fee rates set at the outset without regard to breakpoints, and investments in the business intended to enhance services available to shareholders.
The Boards concluded that Funds Management’s arrangements with respect to each Fund, including contractual breakpoints, constituted a reasonable approach to sharing potential economies of scale with the Funds and their shareholders.
Other benefits to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser
The Boards received and considered information regarding potential “fall-out” or ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including the Sub-Adviser, as a result of their relationships with the Funds. Ancillary benefits could include, among others, benefits directly attributable to other relationships with the Funds and benefits potentially derived from an increase in Funds Management’s and the Sub-Adviser’s business as a result of their relationships with the Funds. The Boards noted that various affiliates of Funds Management may receive distribution-related fees, shareholder servicing payments and sub-transfer agency fees in respect of shares sold or held through them and services provided.
The Boards also reviewed information about soft dollar credits earned and utilized by the Sub-Adviser, fees earned by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser from managing a private investment vehicle for the fund family’s securities lending collateral, and commissions earned by an affiliated broker from portfolio transactions.
Based on their consideration of the factors and information they deemed relevant, including those described here, the Boards did not find that any ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including the Sub-Adviser, were unreasonable.
Conclusion
At the Meeting, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Funds Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Gateway Fund Management Agreement for a one-year term. Additionally, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Master Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement, each for a one-year term.

50  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board Considerations - New Agreements
Overview of the Board evaluation process
At a meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Board Meeting”), the Board of Trustees of Wells Fargo Funds Trust (“Funds Trust”, and the series identified below, the “Funds”) approved the continuation of each Fund’s current Investment Management Agreement (the “Current Investment Management Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”) and the Board of Trustees of Wells Fargo Master Trust (“Master Trust”, and the series identified below in which each Fund invests substantially all of its assets, a “Master Portfolio”) approved the continuation of the current investment advisory agreement (the “Current Advisory Agreement”) with Funds Management, the current sub-advisory agreement with Wells Capital Management Incorporated (“Wells Capital”, and together with Funds Management, the “Advisers”), and the current sub-advisory agreements with Cooke & Bieler, L.P. (“C&B”) and Peregrine Capital Management, LLC (“Peregrine”, and together with C&B, the “Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers”)(collectively, the “Current Agreements”).
Funds Trust Master Trust
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio
Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio
Wells Fargo Index Fund Wells Fargo Index Portfolio
Wells Fargo Real Return Fund Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio
Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio
Each Trustee on the Funds Trust Board and the Master Trust Board of Trustees (collectively, the “Boards”) is not an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) of the Funds or the Master Portfolios (collectively, the “Independent Trustees”). The process followed by the Boards in considering and approving the continuation of each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s Current Agreements is referred to herein as the “2021 Annual Approval Process.”
As noted above, the closing of the sale of Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”) to a holding company (“NewCo”) affiliated with private funds of GTCR LLC (“GTCR”) and of Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. (“Reverence Capital”, and such transaction, the “Transaction”) will result in a change of control of Funds Management and Wells Capital, which will be considered to be an “assignment” of each Fund’s Current Agreements under the 1940 Act that will result in the automatic termination of each Fund’s Current Agreements. In light of the expected termination of each Fund’s Current Agreements upon the closing, at the Board Meeting the Boards also approved, as applicable: (i) for Funds Trust, a new investment management agreement with Funds Management (the “New Investment Management Agreement”); (ii) for the Master Trust, a new advisory agreement with Funds Management (the “New Advisory Agreement”); (iii) for Master Trust, a new sub-advisory agreement (the “New WellsCap Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Wells Capital for Emerging Growth Portfolio, Index Portfolio, Small Company Value Portfolio, Core Bond Portfolio and Real Return Portfolio; (iv) for Master Trust, a new sub-advisory agreement (the “New Peregrine Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Peregrine for Small Company Growth Portfolio; and (v) for Master Trust, a new sub-advisory agreement (the “New C&B Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with C&B for the C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio, each of which is intended to go into effect upon the closing (the “New Agreements”). The process followed by the Boards in reviewing and approving the New Agreements is referred to herein as the “New Agreement Approval Process.”
At a series of meetings held in April and May 2021 (collectively, “April and May 2021 Meetings”) and at the Board Meeting, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital about the New Agreements and related matters. The Boards reviewed and discussed information furnished by Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital that the Boards considered reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the New Agreements and the services to be provided. At these meetings, senior representatives from Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital made presentations to, and responded to questions from, the Boards.
In providing information to the Boards in connection with the 2021 annual approval process for the Current Agreements (the “2021 Annual Approval Process”) and the New Agreement Approval Process, Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital (as applicable) were guided by requests for information submitted by independent legal counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. In considering and approving the New Agreements, the Trustees considered the information they believed relevant, including but not limited to the information discussed herein. The Boards considered not only the specific information presented in connection with the April and May 2021 Meetings as well as the Board Meeting, but also the knowledge gained over time through interaction with Funds Management, as well as with Wells Capital and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers (collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”), about various topics. In this regard, the Boards review reports of Funds Management at each of their regular

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund  |  51


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board meetings, which includes, among other things, portfolio reviews and investment performance reports. In addition, the Boards confer with portfolio managers at various times throughout the year. The Boards were assisted in their evaluation of the New Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom the Independent Trustees received separate legal advice and with whom the Independent Trustees met separately. The Boards did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each individual Trustee may have attributed different weights to various factors.
Among other information considered by the Boards in connection with the Transaction was:
■  Information regarding the Transaction: information about the structure, financing sources and material terms and conditions of the Transaction, including the expected impact on the businesses conducted by the Advisers and by Wells Fargo Funds Distributor LLC, as the distributor of Fund shares.
■  Information regarding NewCo, GTCR and Reverence Capital: (i) information about NewCo, including information about its expected financial condition and access to capital, and senior leadership team; (ii) the experience of senior management at GTCR and Reverence Capital in acquiring portfolio companies; (iii) the plan to operationalize NewCo, including the transition of necessary infrastructure services through a transition services agreement with Wells Fargo under which Wells Fargo will continue to provide NewCo with certain services for a specified period of time after the closing; and (iv) information regarding regulatory matters, compliance, and risk management functions at NewCo, including resources to be dedicated thereto.
Impact of the Transaction on WFAM and Service Providers: (i) information regarding any changes to personnel and/or other resources of the Advisers as a result of the Transaction, including assurances regarding comparable and competitive compensation arrangements to attract and retain highly qualified personnel; and (ii) information about the organizational and operating structure with respect to NewCo, the Advisers and the Funds and Master Portfolios.
■  Impact of the Transaction on the Funds and their Shareholders and the Master Portfolios and their Interest Holders: (i) information regarding anticipated benefits to the Funds and the Master Portfolios as a result of the Transaction; (ii) a commitment that the Funds and Master Portfolios would not bear any expenses, directly or indirectly, in connection with the Transaction; (iii) confirmation that the Advisers and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers intend to continue to manage the Funds in a manner consistent with each Fund’s or Master Portfolio’s current investment objectives and principal investments strategies, as applicable; and (iv) a commitment that neither NewCo nor WFAM will take any steps that would impose any “unfair burden” (as that term is used in section 15(f)(1)(B) of the 1940 Act) on the Funds or the Master Portfolios as a result of the Transaction.
With respect to the New Agreements, the Boards considered: (i) a representation that, after the closing, all of the Funds and Master Portfolios will continue to be managed and advised by their current Advisers and Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, as applicable, and that the same portfolio managers are expected to continue to manage the Funds or Master Portfolios, as applicable, after the Transaction; (ii) information regarding the terms of the New Agreements, including changes as compared to the Current Agreements; (iii) information confirming that the fee rates payable under the New Agreements will not increase as a result of the Transaction as compared to the rates under the Current Agreements; and (iv) assurances that the Transaction is not expected to cause any diminution with respect to the nature, extent and quality of any of the services currently provided to the Funds or the Master Portfolios by the Advisers and Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers as a result of the Transaction.
In addition to considering information furnished specifically to evaluate the impact of the Transaction on the Funds and their respective shareholders and the Master Portfolios and their interest holders in connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards considered information furnished at prior meetings of the Boards and their committees, including detailed information provided in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process. In this regard, in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received information about complex-wide and individual Fund and Master Portfolio performance, fees and expenses, including: (i) a report from an independent data provider comparing the investment performance of each Fund or Master Portfolio to the investment performance of comparable funds and benchmark indices, over various time periods; (ii) a report from an independent data provider comparing each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s total expense ratio (and its components) to those of comparable funds; (iii) comparative information concerning the fees charged and services provided by the Advisers and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, to each Fund or Master Portfolio in managing other accounts (which may include other mutual funds, collective investment funds and institutional accounts), if any, that employ investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing such Fund(s) or Master Portfolio(s) as applicable; and (iv) profitability analyses of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo from providing services to the fund family as a whole.
After its deliberations, the Boards unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the respective New Agreements is reasonable, approved the respective New Agreements for a two-year term, and

52  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
voted to recommend that Fund shareholders approve the New Agreements. The Boards considered the approval of the New Agreements as part of their consideration of agreements for funds and master portfolios across the complex, but their approvals were made on a fund-by-fund basis. The following summarizes a number of important, but not necessarily all, factors considered by the Boards in support of their approvals.
Nature, extent and quality of services
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered various information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds and Master Portfolios by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the Current Agreements. This information included a description of the investment advisory services and Fund-level administrative services covered by the Current Agreements, as well as, among other things, a summary of the background and experience of senior management of WFAM, of which Funds Management and Wells Capital are a part, and a summary of investments made in the business of WFAM. The Boards also received a description of Funds Management’s and Wells Capital’s business continuity plans, including a summary of the performance of such plans and any changes thereto during the COVID-19 pandemic, and of their approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity. The Boards also received and reviewed information about Funds Management’s role as administrator of the Funds’ and Master Portfolios’ liquidity risk management program, Funds Management’s approach to risk management, and Funds Management’s intermediary and vendor oversight program.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also considered the qualifications, background, tenure and responsibilities of each of the portfolio managers primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the Funds and the Master Portfolios. The Boards evaluated the ability of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to attract and retain qualified investment professionals, including research, advisory and supervisory personnel.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards further considered the compliance programs and compliance records of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers. In addition, the Boards took into account the full range of services provided to the Funds by Funds Management and its affiliates.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards considered, among other information, the structure of the Transaction and expected impact, if any, of the Transaction on the operations, facilities, organization and personnel of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers. The Boards received assurances from Funds Management that each Fund and Master Portfolio will continue to be advised by its current Sub-Advisers after the closing, and that the same individual portfolio managers are expected to continue to manage the Funds and Master Portfolios, respectively, after the closing. With respect to the recruitment and retention of key personnel, the Boards noted information from GTCR, Reverence Capital and the Advisers regarding the potential benefits for employees of joining NewCo. The Boards recognized that the personnel of the Advisers who had been extended offers may not accept such offers, and personnel changes at the Advisers or the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers may occur in the future in the ordinary course.
In addition, the Boards considered information regarding the infrastructure, operational capabilities and support staff in place to assist in the portfolio management and operations of the Funds and Master Portfolios, as applicable, including the provision of administrative services, and the anticipated impact of the Transaction on such matters. The Boards also considered the business-related and other risks to which the Advisers and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers may be subject in managing the Funds and Master Portfolios, as applicable, and in connection with the Transaction. The Boards also considered the transition and integration plans as a result of the change in ownership of the Advisers from Wells Fargo to NewCo. The Boards considered the resources and infrastructure that NewCo intends to devote to its compliance program to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations, as well as its risk management program and cybersecurity program. The Boards also took into account assurances received from the Advisers, GTCR and Reverence Capital that the Transaction is not expected to cause any diminution in the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Advisers or the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers to the Funds and their shareholders or to the Master Portfolios and their interest holders, as applicable.
Fund investment performance and expenses
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards considered the investment performance results for each Fund over various time periods ended December 31, 2020. The Boards considered these results in comparison to the investment performance of funds in a universe that was determined by Broadridge Inc. (“Broadridge”) to be similar to each Fund (the “Universe”), and in comparison to each Fund’s benchmark index and to other comparative data. Broadridge is an independent provider of investment company data. The Boards received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the performance Universe. Where applicable, the Boards received information concerning, and discussed factors contributing to, underperformance of Funds relative to the Universe and benchmark for any underperformance periods.
The Master Trust Board of Trustees took note of the investment performance of the Master Portfolios in the context of reviewing the investment performance of the Funds.

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund  |  53


Board considerations (unaudited)
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also received and considered information regarding each Fund’s and Portfolio’s net operating expense ratios and their various components, including actual management fees, custodian and other non-management fees, and Rule 12b-1 and non-Rule 12b-1 shareholder service fees. The Boards considered these ratios in comparison to the median ratios of funds in class-specific expense groups that were determined by Broadridge to be similar to each Fund (the “Groups”). The Boards received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the expense Groups and an explanation of how funds comprising expense groups and their expense ratios may vary from year-to-year.
With respect to the Master Portfolios, the Master Trust Board of Trustees reviewed the fee rates that are payable to Funds Management for investment advisory services, which are the only fees charged at the Master Portfolio level, relative to a corresponding expense Group.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards received a commitment that WFAM will maintain fee and expense commitments for at least two years after the closing. The Boards took into account each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s investment performance and expense information among the factors considered in deciding to approve the New Agreements.
Investment management, advisory and sub-advisory fee rates
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board of Trustees of the Trust noted that Funds Management receives no advisory fees from a Fund as long as the Fund continues to invest all (or substantially all) of its assets in a single master portfolio. If a Fund were to change its investment structure so that it began investing in two or more master portfolios (a fund-of-funds), Funds Management would be entitled to receive an annual fee of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets for providing investment advisory services to the Fund, including allocating the Fund’s assets among the Master Portfolios.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board of Trustees of the Trust reviewed and considered the contractual fee rates that are payable by each Fund to Funds Management under the Fund’s Management Agreement for management services (other than investment advisory services), as well as the contractual fee rates payable by the Fund to Funds Management for class-level administrative services under a Class-Level Administration Agreement, which include, among other things, class-level transfer agency and subtransfer agency costs (collectively, the “Management Rates”). The Master Trust Board of Trustees reviewed and considered the contractual investment advisory fee rate that is payable by each Master Portfolio to Funds Management for investment advisory services under the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement (the “Advisory Agreement Rate”). The Master Trust Board of Trustees also reviewed and considered the contractual investment sub-advisory fee rates that are payable by Funds Management to the Sub-Advisers for investment sub-advisory services (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement Rates”).
Among other information reviewed by the Boards in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, was a comparison of each Fund’s Management Rates which, for this purpose, includes the advisory fees paid at the Master Portfolio level, with the average contractual investment management fee rates of funds in the expense Groups at a common asset level as well as transfer agency costs of the funds in the expense Groups.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also received and considered information about the nature and extent of services offered and fee rates charged by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to other types of clients, if any, with investment strategies similar to those of each Fund. In this regard, the Boards received information about the significantly greater scope of services, and compliance, reporting and other legal burdens and risks of managing proprietary mutual funds compared with those associated with managing assets of other types of clients, including third-party sub-advised fund clients and non-mutual fund clients such as institutional separate accounts.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards noted the assurances received by it that there would be no increases to any of the Management Rates, the Advisory Agreement Rates or the Sub-Advisory Agreement Rates as a result of the Transaction. The Boards also considered that the New Agreements do not change the computation method for calculating such fees, and there is no present intention to reduce expense waiver and reimbursement arrangements that are currently in effect. Based on their consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Boards determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the New Management Agreement and the New Advisory Agreement and payable to the Sub-Advisers under the New Sub-Advisory Agreements was reasonable.
Profitability
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered information concerning the profitability of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo from providing services to the fund family as a whole. The Boards noted that Wells Capital’s profitability information with respect to providing services to each Fund

54  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
and other funds in the family was subsumed in the WFAM and Wells Fargo profitability analysis. The Boards did not consider profitability with respect to the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, as the sub-advisory fees paid to the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers had been negotiated by Funds Management on an arm’s-length basis.
Funds Management reported on the methodologies and estimates used in calculating profitability in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, including a description of the methodology used to allocate certain expenses. Among other things, the Boards noted that the levels of profitability reported on a fund-by-fund basis varied widely, depending on factors such as the size, type and age of fund.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards received certain information about NewCo’s projected financial condition, and reviewed with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital the underlying assumptions on which such information was based. The Boards considered that NewCo is a newly formed entity, with no historical operations, revenues or expenses, and that it is difficult to predict with any degree of certainty the future profitability of NewCo and the Advisers from advisory activities under the New Agreements. The Boards considered that the fee rates payable under the New Agreements will not increase as a result of the Transaction as compared to the rates under the Current Agreements, and that the current contractual expense limitations applicable to each Fund will not increase. The Boards noted that if the New Agreements are approved by shareholders and the Transaction closes, the Boards will have the opportunity in the future to review the profitability of NewCo and the Advisers from advisory activities under the New Agreements with the Advisers.
Economies of scale
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered information about the potential for Funds Management to experience economies of scale in the provision of management services to the Funds and the Master Portfolios, the difficulties of calculating economies of scale at an individual fund level, and the extent to which potential scale benefits are shared with Fund shareholders. The Boards noted the existence of breakpoints in each Fund’s management fee structure and each Master Portfolio’s advisory fee structure, which operate generally to reduce each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s and expense ratios as they grows in size, and the size of each Fund and Master Portfolio and in relation to such breakpoints. The Boards considered that, in addition to advisory fee and management fee and advisory fee breakpoints, Funds Management shares potential economies of scale from its management business in a variety of ways, including through fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangements, competitive management fee rates set at the outset without regard to breakpoints, and investments in the business intended to enhance services available to shareholders.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards noted that NewCo and the Advisers may benefit from possible growth of the Funds and Master Portfolios resulting from enhanced distribution capabilities. However, the Boards noted that other factors could also affect the potential for economies of scale, and that it was not possible to quantify any potential future economies of scale. Based upon the information furnished to the Boards in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process and the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards concluded that Funds Management’s arrangements with respect to each Fund and Master Portfolio, including contractual breakpoints and expense limitation arrangements, constitute a reasonable approach to sharing potential economies of scale with the Fund and its shareholders and the Master Portfolio and its interest holders.
“Fall-out” benefits to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered information regarding potential “fall-out” or ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including Wells Capital, and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers as a result of their relationships with the Funds and the Master Portfolios, as applicable. Ancillary benefits could include, among others, benefits directly attributable to other relationships with the Funds and Master Portfolios and benefits potentially derived from an increase in Funds Management’s and the Wells Capital’s business as a result of their relationships with the Funds and the Master Portfolios. The Boards noted that various current affiliates of Funds Management may receive distribution-related fees, shareholder servicing payments and sub-transfer agency fees in respect of shares sold or held through them and services provided.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also reviewed information about any soft dollar credits earned and utilized by the Sub-Advisers, fees earned by Funds Management and Wells Capital from managing a private investment vehicle for the fund family’s securities lending collateral, and commissions earned by an affiliated broker of Wells Fargo from portfolio transactions.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards received information to the effect that the Transaction is not expected to have a material impact on the fall-out benefits currently realized by Funds Management and its affiliates, including Wells Capital, and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers. The information reviewed by the Boards also noted that several of the ancillary benefits identified for WFAM would be potential ancillary benefits for NewCo, including that the scale and reputation of

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund  |  55


Board considerations (unaudited)
the Funds and Master Portfolios might benefit NewCo’s broader reputation, product initiatives, technology investment and talent acquisition. Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Boards did not find that any ancillary benefits expected to be received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including NewCo and Wells Capital and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, under the New Agreements were unreasonable.
Conclusion
At the Board Meeting, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Boards unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the New Agreements is reasonable, approved the New Agreements for a two-year term, and voted to recommend that Fund shareholders approve the New Agreements.

56  |  Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board Considerations - Interim Agreements
At a meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Board Meeting”), the Boards of Trustees (each, a “Board”, and collectively, the “Boards”) of Wells Fargo Funds Trust, Wells Fargo Master Trust, Wells Fargo Variable Trust, Wells Fargo Global Dividend Opportunity Fund, Wells Fargo Income Opportunities Fund, Wells Fargo Multi-Sector Income Fund and Wells Fargo Utilities and High Income Fund (each a “Trust”, and the series thereof, a “Fund”) reviewed and approved for the Trusts and Funds, as applicable: (i) interim investment management agreements (the “Interim Management Agreements”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”); (ii) interim investment advisory agreements (the “Interim Advisory Agreements”) with Funds Management; and (iii) interim sub-advisory agreements (the “Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements”) with each of Cooke & Bieler, L.P., Galliard Capital Management LLC (“Galliard”), Peregrine Capital Management Inc., Wells Capital Management LLC (“WellsCap”), and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited (“WFAMI”, and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”). Each Trustee on the Board is not an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) of the Funds (collectively, the “Independent Trustees”). The Interim Management Agreements, Interim Advisory Agreements, and Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements are collectively referred to as the “Interim Advisory Agreements.”
At the Board Meeting, the Boards reviewed and approved the continuation of existing investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements (the “Current Advisory Agreements”) for each Trust and Fund, as applicable. The factors considered and conclusions reached by the Boards in approving the Current Advisory Agreements are summarized in the section entitled “Board Considerations – Current Agreements” of this shareholder report. The Boards noted that Wells Fargo & Company has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”), which includes Funds Management, Galliard, WellsCap and WFAMI (the “Affiliated Sub-Advisers”), to a holding company affiliated with private funds of GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. (the “Transaction”). The Boards further noted that the Transaction would result in a change-of-control of Funds Management and the Affiliated Sub-Advisers, which would be considered to be an “assignment” under the 1940 Act that would terminate the Current Advisory Agreements. At the Board Meeting, the Boards also reviewed and approved new investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements (the “New Advisory Agreements”) for each Trust and Fund, as applicable, that would replace the Current Advisory Agreements upon consummation of the Transaction, subject to approval of the New Advisory Agreements by the applicable Trust’s or Fund’s shareholders. The factors considered and conclusions reached by the Boards in approving the New Advisory Agreements are summarized in the section entitled “Board Considerations – New Agreements” of this shareholder report.
At the Board Meeting, the Boards also approved the Interim Advisory Agreements, which will go into effect for a Trust or Fund only in the event that shareholders of such Trust or Fund do not approve the New Advisory Agreement(s) for the Trust or Fund by the closing date of the Transaction, when the Current Advisory Agreements will terminate. The Board noted that, in such a circumstance, the Interim Advisory Agreements will permit continuity of management by allowing Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to continue providing services to the Trust or Fund pursuant to the Interim Advisory Agreements while the Trust or Fund continues to solicit shareholder approval of such New Advisory Agreement(s). The Boards noted that the terms of the Interim Advisory Agreements are identical to those of the Current Advisory Agreements, except for the term and the addition of escrow provisions with respect to the advisory fees. The Boards also noted that the entities that would service the Funds and Trusts under the Interim Advisory Agreements are identical to those that provide services under the Current Advisory Agreements and those that will provide services under the New Advisory Agreements.
In approving the Interim Advisory Agreements, the Boards considered the same factors and reached the same conclusions as they considered and reached with respect to the Boards’ approvals of the Current Advisory Agreements and New Advisory Agreements, as applicable, which are described in separate Board Consideration sections within this shareholder report. Prior to the Board Meeting, including at a series of meetings held in April and May 2021, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. about the Interim Advisory Agreements and related matters. The Independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Interim Advisory Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately.
At the Board Meeting, after considering the factors and reaching the conclusions described in the separate Board Consideration sections within this shareholder report, the Boards unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and to each Sub-Adviser under each of the Interim Advisory Agreements was reasonable, and approved the Interim Advisory Agreements.

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund  |  57


For more information
More information about Wells Fargo Funds is available free upon request. To obtain literature, please write, visit the Fund's website, or call:
Wells Fargo Funds
P.O. Box 219967
Kansas City, MO 64121-9967
Website: wfam.com
Individual investors: 1-800-222-8222
Retail investment professionals: 1-888-877-9275
Institutional investment professionals: 1-866-765-0778
This report and the financial statements contained herein are submitted for the general information of the shareholders of the Fund. If this report is used for promotional purposes, distribution of the report must be accompanied or preceded by a current prospectus. Before investing, please consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of the investment. For a current prospectus and, if available, a summary prospectus, containing this information, call 1-800-222-8222 or visit the Fund's website at wfam.com. Read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) is the trade name for certain investment advisory/management firms owned by Wells Fargo & Company. These firms include but are not limited to Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC. Certain products managed by WFAM entities are distributed by Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC (a broker-dealer and Member FINRA).
This material is for general informational and educational purposes only and is NOT intended to provide investment advice or a recommendation of any kind - including a recommendation for any specific investment, strategy, or plan.
 INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED  ■  NO BANK GUARANTEE  ■  MAY LOSE VALUE 
© 2021 Wells Fargo & Company. All rights reserved.
PAR-0621-00762 07-21
A282/AR282 05-21


Annual Report
May 31, 2021
Wells Fargo Index Fund




Contents

2

6

10
Wells Fargo Index Fund  

11
Financial statements  

12

13

14

15

18

23
Wells Fargo Index Portfolio  

24
Financial statements  

38

39

40

41

42

48

49
Board considerations  

54

58

64
 
Reduce clutter.
Save trees.
Sign up for electronic delivery of prospectuses and shareholder reports at wellsfargo.com/ advantagedelivery
The views expressed and any forward-looking statements are as of May 31, 2021, unless otherwise noted, and are those of the Fund's portfolio managers and/or Wells Fargo Asset Management. Discussions of individual securities or the markets generally are not intended as individual recommendations. Future events or results may vary significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. The views expressed are subject to change at any time in response to changing circumstances in the market. Wells Fargo Asset Management and the Fund disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any views expressed or forward-looking statements.
 INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED  ■  NO BANK GUARANTEE  ■  MAY LOSE VALUE 

Wells Fargo Index Fund  |  1


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
Andrew Owen
President
Wells Fargo Funds
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to offer you this annual report for the Wells Fargo Index Fund for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021. Despite the initial challenges presented by the spread of COVID-19 cases and the business restrictions implemented throughout much of the world, global stocks showed robust returns, supported by global stimulus programs, a rapid vaccination rollout, and recovering consumer and corporate sentiment. Bond markets mostly produced positive returns, as investors searched for yield and diversification during difficult market stretches.
For the 12-month period, equities had robust returns, as policymakers continued to fight the effects of COVID-19. Emerging market stocks led both non-U.S. developed market equities and U.S. stocks. Gains by fixed-income securities were varied, though mostly positive. For the period, U.S. stocks, based on the S&P 500 Index,1 gained 40.32%. International stocks, as measured by the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net),2 returned 42.78%, while the MSCI EM Index (Net),3 had stronger performance, with a 51.00% gain. Among bond indexes, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index,4 returned -0.40%, the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (unhedged),5 gained 7.84%, the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index,6 returned 4.74%, and the ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index,7 returned 15.18%.
The COVID-19 lockdown began over a year ago.
By June, economies started to reopen and global central banks committed to do all they could to provide economic support through liquidity and low borrowing costs. U.S. economic activity was aided by one-time $1,200 stimulus checks and $600 weekly bonus unemployment benefits that lasted through July. However, unemployment remained historically high and COVID-19 cases began to increase by late June. China’s economic recovery began to pick up momentum.
July was broadly positive for equities and fixed income. However, economic data and a resurgence of COVID-19 cases underscored the urgent need to regain control of the pandemic. Second-quarter gross domestic product (GDP) shrank from the previous quarter by 9.5% and 12.1% in the U.S. and the eurozone, respectively. In contrast, China’s second-quarter GDP grew 3.2% year over year. The U.S. economy added 1.8 million jobs in July, but a double-digit jobless rate persisted.

1 The S&P 500 Index consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. It is a market-value-weighted index with each stock's weight in the index proportionate to its market value. You cannot invest directly in an index.
2 The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) All Country World Index (ACWI) ex USA Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed and emerging markets, excluding the United States. Source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI. You cannot invest directly in an index.

3 The MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure equity market performance of emerging markets. You cannot invest directly in an index.

4 The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based benchmark that measures the investment-grade, U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage pass-throughs), asset-backed securities, and commercial mortgage-backed securities. You cannot invest directly in an index.

5 The Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (unhedged) is an unmanaged index that provides a broad-based measure of the global investment-grade fixed-income markets excluding the U.S. dollar-denominated debt market. You cannot invest directly in an index.

6 The Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index composed of long-term tax-exempt bonds with a minimum credit rating of Baa. You cannot invest directly in an index.

7 The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index of domestic and Yankee high-yield bonds. The index tracks the performance of high-yield securities traded in the U.S. bond market. You cannot invest directly in an index. Copyright 2021. ICE Data Indices, LLC. All rights reserved.

2  |  Wells Fargo Index Fund


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
The stock market continued to rally in August despite concerns over rising numbers of U.S. and European COVID-19 cases as well as the July expiration of the $600 weekly bonus unemployment benefit. Relatively strong second-quarter earnings boosted investor sentiment along with the U.S. Federal Reserve Board’s (Fed’s) announcement of a monetary policy shift expected to support longer-term low interest rates. U.S. manufacturing and services activity indexes beat expectations while the U.S. housing market maintained strength. In Europe, retail sales expanded and consumer confidence was steady. China’s economy continued to expand.
Stocks grew more volatile in September on mixed economic data. U.S. economic activity continued to grow. However, U.S. unemployment remained elevated at 7.9% in September. With the U.S. Congress delaying further fiscal relief and uncertainties surrounding a possible vaccine, doubts crept back into the financial markets. In the U.K., a lack of progress in Brexit talks weighed on markets. China’s economy picked up steam, fueled by increased global demand.
In October, capital markets stepped back from their six-month rally. Market volatility rose in advance of the U.S. election and amid a global increase in COVID-19 infections. Europe introduced tighter restrictions affecting economic activity. U.S. markets looked favorably at the prospect of Democratic control of the federal purse strings, which could lead to additional fiscal stimulus and a boost to economic activity. Meanwhile, China reported 4.9% third-quarter GDP growth.
Global stocks rallied in November, propelled by optimism over three promising COVID-19 vaccines. Reversing recent trends, value stocks outperformed growth stocks and cyclical stocks outpaced information technology (IT) stocks. However, U.S. unemployment remained elevated, with a net job loss of 10 million since February. The eurozone services Purchasing Managers' Index, a monthly survey of purchasing managers, contracted sharply while the region’s manufacturing activity grew. The U.S. election results added to the upbeat mood as investors anticipated more consistent policies in the new administration.
Financial markets ended the year with strength on high expectations for a rapid rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines, the successful passage of a $900 billion stimulus package, and rising expectations of additional economic support from a Democratic-led Congress. U.S. economic data were mixed with still-elevated unemployment and weak retail sales but growth in manufacturing output. In contrast, China’s economic expansion continued in both manufacturing and nonmanufacturing. U.S. COVID-19 infection rates continued to rise even as new state and local lockdown measures were implemented.
The calendar year 2021 began with emerging market stocks leading all major asset classes in January, driven by China’s strong economic growth and a broad recovery in corporate earnings, which propelled China’s stock market higher. In the U.S., positive news on vaccine trials and January expansion in both the manufacturing and services sectors was offset by a weak December monthly jobs report. This was compounded by technical factors as some hedge funds were forced to sell stocks to protect themselves against a well-publicized short squeeze coordinated by a group of retail investors. Eurozone sentiment and economic growth were particularly weak, reflecting the impact of a new lockdown with stricter social distancing along with a slow vaccine rollout.
February saw major domestic equity indexes driven higher on the hope of a new stimulus bill, improving COVID-19 vaccination numbers, and the gradual reopening of the economy. Most S&P 500 companies reported better-than-expected earnings, with positive surprises coming from the financials, IT, health care, and materials sectors. Japan saw its economy strengthen as a result of strong export numbers. Meanwhile, crude oil prices continued their climb, rising more than 25% for the year. Domestic government bonds experienced a sharp sell-off in late February as markets priced in a more robust economic recovery and higher future growth and inflation expectations.
Global stocks rallied in November, propelled by optimism over three promising COVID-19 vaccines.

Wells Fargo Index Fund  |  3


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
The passage of the massive domestic stimulus bill highlighted March activity, leading to increased forecasts for U.S. growth in 2021.
The passage of the massive domestic stimulus bill highlighted March activity, leading to increased forecasts for U.S. growth in 2021. Domestic employment surged as COVID-19 vaccinations and an increasingly open economy spurred hiring. A majority of U.S. small companies reported they were operating at pre-pandemic capacity or higher. Value stocks continued its outperformance of growth stocks in the month, continuing the trend that started in late 2020. Meanwhile, most major developed global equity indexes were up month to date on the back of rising optimism regarding the outlook for global growth. While the U.S. and U.K. have been the most successful in terms of the vaccine rollout, even in markets where the vaccine has lagged, such as in the eurozone and Japan, equity indexes in many of those countries have also been in positive territory this year.
Equity markets produced another strong showing in April. Domestically, the continued reopening of the economy had a strong impact on positive equity performance, as people started leaving their households and jobless claims continued to fall. Domestic corporate bonds performed well and the U.S. dollar weakened. Meanwhile, the U.S. government continued to seek to invest in the recovery, this time by outlining a package of over $2 billion to improve infrastructure. The primary headwind in April was inflation, as investors tried to determine the breadth and longevity of recent price increases. Developed Europe has been supported by a meaningful increase in the pace of vaccinations. Unfortunately many emerging market countries have not been as successful. India in particular has seen COVID-19 cases surge, serving as an example of the need to get vaccinations rolled out to less developed nations.
Vaccine rollouts continued in May, leading to loosened restrictions globally. As a result, equity markets in general saw a minor increase in returns. Concerns that the continued economic rebound could result in inflation increases becoming more than transitory were supported by the higher input costs businesses are experiencing. Meanwhile, those inflation concerns were tempered by the Fed, which stayed steady on its view of the economy and eased fears of a sudden and substantial policy change. Positive performance in the emerging market equity space was supported this month by steady consumer demand and strong commodity prices. Fixed-income markets were also slightly positive for the month, driven by inflation uncertainty and a softer U.S. dollar.
Don’t let short-term uncertainty derail long-term investment goals.
Periods of investment uncertainty can present challenges, but experience has taught us that maintaining long-term investment goals can be an effective way to plan for the future. Although diversification cannot guarantee an investment profit or prevent losses, we believe it can be an effective way to manage investment risk and potentially smooth out overall portfolio performance. We encourage investors to know their investments and to understand that appropriate levels of risk-taking may unlock opportunities.
Thank you for choosing to invest with Wells Fargo Funds. We appreciate your confidence in us and remain committed to helping you meet your financial needs.
Sincerely,
Andrew Owen
President
Wells Fargo Funds

For further information about your Fund, contact your investment professional, visit our website at wfam.com, or call us directly at 1-800-222-8222.

4  |  Wells Fargo Index Fund


This page is intentionally left blank.


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Investment objective The Fund seeks to replicate the total returns of the S&P 500 Index, before fees and expenses.
Manager Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC
Subadviser for the affiliated master portfolio*
Wells Capital Management Incorporated
Portfolio managers John R. Campbell, CFA®, David Neal, CFA®, Robert M. Wicentowski, CFA®
    
Average annual total returns (%) as of May 31, 2021
    Including sales charge   Excluding sales charge   Expense ratios1 (%)
  Inception date 1 year 5 year 10 year   1 year 5 year 10 year   Gross Net 2
Class A (WFILX) 11-4-1998 31.67 15.21 13.13   39.71 16.58 13.80   0.67 0.45
Class C (WFINX) 4-30-1999 37.83 15.73 12.96   38.83 15.73 12.96   1.42 1.20
Administrator Class (WFIOX) 2-14-1985   39.97 16.81 14.08   0.44 0.25
S&P 500 Index3   40.32 17.16 14.38  
Figures quoted represent past performance, which is no guarantee of future results, and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder may pay on an investment in a fund. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance shown without sales charges would be lower if sales charges were reflected. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted, which assumes the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. Current month-end performance is available on the Fund’s website, wfam.com.
Please keep in mind that high double-digit returns were primarily achieved during favorable market conditions. You should not expect that such favorable returns can be consistently achieved. A fund’s performance, especially for short time periods, should not be the sole factor in making your investment decision.
Index returns do not include transaction costs associated with buying and selling securities, any mutual fund fees or expenses, or any taxes. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
For Class A shares, the maximum front-end sales charge is 5.75%. For Class C shares, the maximum contingent deferred sales charge is 1.00%. Performance including a contingent deferred sales charge assumes the sales charge for the corresponding time period. Administrator Class shares are sold without a front-end sales charge or contingent deferred sales charge.
1 Reflects the expense ratios as stated in the most recent prospectuses. The expense ratios shown are subject to change and may differ from the annualized expense ratios shown in the financial highlights of this report.
2 The manager has contractually committed through September 30, 2021, to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers at 0.45% for Class A, 1.20% for Class C, 0.25% for Administrator Class, Brokerage commissions, stamp duty fees, interest, taxes, acquired fund fees and expenses (if any) from funds in which the affiliated master portfolio invests, and extraordinary expenses are excluded from the expense caps. Net expenses from the affiliated master portfolio are included in the expense caps. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. Without these caps, the Fund’s returns would have been lower. The expense ratio paid by an investor is the net expense ratio (the total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers) as stated in the prospectuses.
3 The S&P 500 Index consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. It is a market-value weighted index with each stock’s weight in the index proportionate to its market value. You cannot invest directly in an index.
Stock values fluctuate in response to the activities of individual companies and general market and economic conditions. The use of derivatives may reduce returns and/or increase volatility. Consult the fund’s prospectus for additional information on these and other risks.

* The Fund is a feeder fund in a master-feeder structure that invests substantially all of its assets in a single affiliated master portfolio of the Wells Fargo Master Trust with a substantially identical investment objective and substantially similar investment strategies. References to the investment activities of the Fund are intended to refer to the investment activities of the affiliated master portfolio in which it invests.
CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.

6  |  Wells Fargo Index Fund


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Growth of $10,000 investment as of May 31, 20211
1 The chart compares the performance of Class A shares for the most recent ten years with the S&P 500 Index. The chart assumes a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in Class A shares and reflects all operating expenses and assumes the maximum initial sales charge of 5.75%.

Wells Fargo Index Fund  |  7


Performance highlights (unaudited)
MANAGER'S DISCUSSION
Fund highlights
The Fund underperformed its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index, for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021.
During the period, the Fund benefited from positive returns in all 11 Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) economic sectors, led by financials, materials, and industrials.
The utilities sector was the Fund’s lowest-performing sector, followed by health care and consumer staples.
The S&P 500 Index surged higher during the period as the economy recovered from the COVID-19 recession.
Over the trailing 12 months, the S&P 500 Index advanced on improving economic data, reopening momentum, broadening vaccine distribution, and continued tailwinds from massive fiscal and monetary stimulus. Although the global COVID-19 pandemic persists, overall U.S. activity reaccelerated as restrictions were scaled back and vaccinations neared a critical mass. Throughout most of 2020, a combination of declining interest rates and a global pandemic accelerated secular trends that already favored the business models of many technology-focused, large-cap growth stocks. However, with last November’s announcement of effective COVID-19 vaccines, investors began a rotation into cyclical value stocks and out of the perceived safety of the secular growth, “stay at home” stocks that dominated most of 2020. This rotation was supported by challenging year-over-year comparisons in the strongest-performing growth stocks, a weaker dollar, and a steepening yield curve.
Ten largest holdings (%) as of May 31, 20211
Apple Incorporated 5.45
Microsoft Corporation 5.22
Amazon.com Incorporated 3.82
Facebook Incorporated Class A 2.19
Alphabet Incorporated Class A 1.96
Alphabet Incorporated Class C 1.93
Berkshire Hathaway Incorporated Class B 1.53
JPMorgan Chase & Company 1.39
Tesla Motors Incorporated 1.33
Johnson & Johnson 1.23
1 Each holding represents the Fund’s allocable portion of the affiliated master portfolio security. Figures represent each holding as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets. Holdings are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
Periodic rebalancing of the Fund aligned with the changing weights and constituents of the S&P 500 Index.
The objective of the Fund is to replicate the performance of the S&P 500 Index before fees and expenses. The portfolio management team uses an investment process designed with the goal of controlling trading and implementation costs and reducing tracking error as much as possible. The portfolio holdings will be highly reflective of the index composition, and the strategy’s performance should closely align with that of the index. Periodic rebalancing takes place to reflect the frequently changing weights and constituents of the index. Consistent with its objective, during the period, the Fund performed closely in line with the return of the benchmark before fees and expenses.
The financials, materials, and industrials sectors led the S&P 500 Index.
During the period, the S&P 500 Index had positive returns in each of the 11 GICS sectors, with 465 of the S&P 500 Index’s constituents generating positive returns. The top-contributing individual stocks to the S&P 500 Index’s overall performance were Apple Incorporated, Microsoft Corporation, Amazon.com, Incorporated, Alphabet Incorporated, and Facebook, Incorporated. Beginning in November, optimism over the reopening of the U.S. economy led investors to rotate out of the perceived safety of secular growth and into more cyclical sectors, such as financials, materials, and industrials. Within financials, Bank of America Corporation, JPMorgan Chase & Company, and Berkshire Hathaway Incorporated each delivered returns exceeding 50%. Within materials, Freeport-McMoran Incorporated, a mining company, was up over 370%. Industrials companies such as FedEx Corporation; United Parcel Service, Incorporated; and American Airlines, Incorporated, all returned over 100%.
 

8  |  Wells Fargo Index Fund


Performance highlights (unaudited)
The utilities, health care, and consumer staples sectors produced the lowest returns for the period.
At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, investors placed a premium on secular growth and defensive companies with “safety” characteristics, including strong balance sheets and lower stock volatility. However, as the U.S. economy recovered and equity markets rallied, more defensive sectors such as utilities, health care, and consumer staples lagged the rest of the S&P 500 Index. Despite the rotation out of defensive sectors, health care and consumer staples were each up over 20% while utilities, the lowest-performing sector, produced a double-digit positive return for the period.
Sector allocation as of May 31, 20211
1 Figures represent the sector allocation of the affiliated master portfolio as a percentage of the long-term investments of the affiliated master portfolio. These amounts are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
Accommodative monetary and fiscal policy could rapidly shift the economy into mid-cycle dynamics.
The historic economic downturn of 2020 was unique in that the pandemic inflicted a major external shock to the global economic system, akin to a large-scale natural disaster. The world’s ongoing recovery will likely be uneven due to regional differences in growth rates, reopening timelines, and vaccination rollouts. The global economic reboot is progressing with ongoing tailwinds from prodigious monetary and fiscal support, but not without growing signs of inflation. Central banks acknowledge the risks from inflation, but most believe that the rise in inflation will be transitory.
Early-stage cyclical themes like value and smaller capitalization could continue to do well, but the market could also abruptly favor higher-quality, lower-volatility, and more defensive names if the burst of post-pandemic growth leads to some excesses. The strongest gains within value have already likely occurred, driven by short covering and investor repositioning. Growth is no longer scarce in this part of the economic cycle and investors typically become more selective as the cycle matures. Faster economic growth and rising inflation should result in a broadening of earnings growth, higher interest rates, and a steeper yield curve. These trends have historically provided tailwinds for value stocks.
 

Wells Fargo Index Fund  |  9


Fund expenses (unaudited)
As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and contingent deferred sales charges (if any) on redemptions and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) and/or shareholder servicing fees, and other Fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period from December 1, 2020 to May 31, 2021.
Actual expenses
The “Actual” line of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the “Actual” line under the heading entitled “Expenses paid during period” for your applicable class of shares to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes
The “Hypothetical” line of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) and contingent deferred sales charges. Therefore, the “Hypothetical” line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
  Beginning
account value
12-1-2020
Ending
account value
5-31-2021
Expenses
paid during
the period1,2
Annualized net
expense ratio2
Class A        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,166.91 $2.38 0.44%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,022.74 $2.22 0.44%
Class C        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,162.43 $6.47 1.20%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,018.95 $6.04 1.20%
Administrator Class        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,168.00 $1.35 0.25%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,023.68 $1.26 0.25%
1 Expenses paid is equal to the annualized net expense ratio of each class multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one-half-year period).
2 Amounts reflect net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio in which the Fund invests.

10  |  Wells Fargo Index Fund


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

          Value
Investment companies:  100.02%          
Affiliated master portfolio:  100.02%          
Wells Fargo Index Portfolio         $1,262,895,519
Total Investment companies (Cost $113,093,548)         1,262,895,519
Total investments in securities (Cost $113,093,548) 100.02%       1,262,895,519
Other assets and liabilities, net (0.02)            (308,784)
Total net assets 100.00%       $1,262,586,735
Transactions with the affiliated Master Portfolio were as follows:
  % of
ownership,
beginning
of period
% of
ownership,
end of
period
Net realized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Interest
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Dividends
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Affiliated
income
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Value,
end of
period
% of
net
assets
Wells Fargo Index Portfolio 96.61% 96.64% $101,189,274 $267,094,800 $975 $17,362,268 $76,003 $1,262,895,519 100.02%
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Index Fund  |  11


Statement of assets and liabilities—May 31, 2021
   
Assets  
Investments in affiliated Master Portfolio, at value (cost $113,093,548)

$ 1,262,895,519
Receivable for Fund shares sold

608,876
Receivable from manager

115,581
Total assets

1,263,619,976
Liabilities  
Payable for Fund shares redeemed

431,233
Shareholder servicing fees payable

210,591
Administration fees payable

196,145
Distribution fee payable

7,954
Accrued expenses and other liabilities

187,318
Total liabilities

1,033,241
Total net assets

$1,262,586,735
Net assets consist of  
Paid-in capital

$ 48,356,059
Total distributable earnings

1,214,230,676
Total net assets

$1,262,586,735
Computation of net asset value and offering price per share  
Net assets – Class A

$ 835,780,801
Shares outstanding – Class A1

16,660,328
Net asset value per share – Class A

$50.17
Maximum offering price per share – Class A2

$53.23
Net assets – Class C

$ 12,530,203
Shares outstanding – Class C1

244,770
Net asset value per share – Class C

$51.19
Net assets – Administrator Class

$ 414,275,731
Shares outstanding – Administrator Class1

8,058,709
Net asset value per share – Administrator Class

$51.41
1 The Fund has an unlimited number of authorized shares.
2 Maximum offering price is computed as 100/94.25 of net asset value. On investments of $50,000 or more, the offering price is reduced.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

12  |  Wells Fargo Index Fund


Statement of operations—year ended May 31, 2021
   
Investment income  
Dividends allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio (net of foreign withholding taxes of $89,256)

$ 17,362,268
Affiliated income allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

76,003
Interest allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

975
Expenses allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

(1,277,256)
Total investment income

16,161,990
Expenses  
Management fee

572,125
Administration fees  
Class A

1,572,960
Class C

29,821
Administrator Class

495,327
Shareholder servicing fees  
Class A

1,872,572
Class C

35,436
Administrator Class

354,247
Distribution fee  
Class C

106,120
Custody and accounting fees

50,221
Professional fees

33,414
Registration fees

66,425
Shareholder report expenses

62,483
Trustees’ fees and expenses

21,079
Other fees and expenses

141,773
Total expenses

5,414,003
Less: Fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements  
Fund-level

(1,962,363)
Class A

(299,611)
Class C

(4,260)
Administrator Class

(1,920)
Net expenses

3,145,849
Net investment income

13,016,141
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments  
Net realized gains on securities transactions allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

101,189,274
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on securities transactions allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

267,094,800
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

368,284,074
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

$381,300,215
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Index Fund  |  13


Statement of changes in net assets
         
  Year ended
May 31, 2021
Year ended
May 31, 2020
Operations        
Net investment income

  $ 13,016,141   $ 17,076,939
Net realized gains on investments

  101,189,274   181,564,933
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

  267,094,800   (64,676,797)
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

  381,300,215   133,965,075
Distributions to shareholders from        
Net investment income and net realized gains        
Class A

  (99,506,178)   (189,301,116)
Class C

  (1,661,488)   (4,981,676)
Administrator Class

  (50,898,614)   (116,506,789)
Total distributions to shareholders

  (152,066,280)   (310,789,581)
Capital share transactions Shares   Shares  
Proceeds from shares sold        
Class A

543,966 25,097,626 732,292 32,317,931
Class C

12,993 609,026 57,399 2,669,398
Administrator Class

1,009,053 47,555,074 1,814,601 90,665,958
    73,261,726   125,653,287
Reinvestment of distributions        
Class A

2,188,868 96,461,288 4,215,720 183,009,568
Class C

31,396 1,403,441 89,742 3,933,010
Administrator Class

1,056,266 47,713,951 2,338,163 103,711,408
    145,578,680   290,653,986
Payment for shares redeemed        
Class A

(2,068,334) (95,239,910) (2,625,376) (122,456,063)
Class C

(183,902) (8,615,422) (145,585) (6,654,277)
Administrator Class

(2,159,572) (101,444,640) (5,173,988) (247,150,828)
    (205,299,972)   (376,261,168)
Net increase in net assets resulting from capital share transactions

  13,540,434   40,046,105
Total increase (decrease) in net assets

  242,774,369   (136,778,401)
Net assets        
Beginning of period

  1,019,812,366   1,156,590,767
End of period

  $1,262,586,735   $1,019,812,366
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

14  |  Wells Fargo Index Fund


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class A 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$41.27 $49.48 $63.35 $66.85 $62.85
Net investment income

0.48 0.65 0.82 0.99 1 1.05
Net realized and unrealized gains on investments

14.92 5.82 0.54 7.99 9.09
Total from investment operations

15.40 6.47 1.36 8.98 10.14
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.57) (0.67) (0.90) (1.02) (1.16)
Net realized gains

(5.93) (14.01) (14.33) (11.46) (4.98)
Total distributions to shareholders

(6.50) (14.68) (15.23) (12.48) (6.14)
Net asset value, end of period

$50.17 $41.27 $49.48 $63.35 $66.85
Total return2

39.71% 12.02% 3.32% 13.87% 16.94%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

0.65% 0.67% 0.65% 0.63% 0.62%
Net expenses

0.44% 0.44% 0.45% 0.45% 0.45%
Net investment income

1.08% 1.47% 1.51% 1.49% 1.68%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate3

4% 3% 4% 3% 9%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$835,781 $660,101 $676,511 $702,866 $684,004
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.11%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.12%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.11%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.10%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.10%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges.
3 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Index Fund  |  15


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class C 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$41.90 $50.02 $63.67 $67.11 $63.12
Net investment income

0.16 1 0.30 0.46 1 0.50 1 0.66
Net realized and unrealized gains on investments

15.21 5.84 0.52 8.00 9.02
Total from investment operations

15.37 6.14 0.98 8.50 9.68
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.15) (0.25) (0.30) (0.48) (0.71)
Net realized gains

(5.93) (14.01) (14.33) (11.46) (4.98)
Total distributions to shareholders

(6.08) (14.26) (14.63) (11.94) (5.69)
Net asset value, end of period

$51.19 $41.90 $50.02 $63.67 $67.11
Total return2

38.83% 11.17% 2.54% 13.02% 16.07%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

1.40% 1.42% 1.39% 1.38% 1.37%
Net expenses

1.20% 1.20% 1.20% 1.20% 1.20%
Net investment income

0.34% 0.72% 0.77% 0.72% 0.93%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate3

4% 3% 4% 3% 9%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$12,530 $16,103 $19,146 $66,117 $67,691
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.11%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.12%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.11%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.10%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.10%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges.
3 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

16  |  Wells Fargo Index Fund


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Administrator Class 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$42.15 $50.24 $64.04 $67.43 $63.33
Net investment income

0.58 0.81 1.02 1 1.26 1.41
Net realized and unrealized gains on investments

15.26 5.85 0.48 7.94 8.94
Total from investment operations

15.84 6.66 1.50 9.20 10.35
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.65) (0.74) (0.97) (1.13) (1.27)
Net realized gains

(5.93) (14.01) (14.33) (11.46) (4.98)
Total distributions to shareholders

(6.58) (14.75) (15.30) (12.59) (6.25)
Net asset value, end of period

$51.41 $42.15 $50.24 $64.04 $67.43
Total return

39.97% 12.25% 3.52% 14.10% 17.18%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

0.42% 0.44% 0.41% 0.40% 0.39%
Net expenses

0.25% 0.25% 0.25% 0.25% 0.25%
Net investment income

1.28% 1.67% 1.72% 1.70% 1.88%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate2

4% 3% 4% 3% 9%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$414,276 $343,609 $460,934 $829,004 $1,151,522
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.11%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.12%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.11%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.10%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.10%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Index Fund  |  17


Notes to financial statements
1. ORGANIZATION
Wells Fargo Funds Trust (the "Trust"), a Delaware statutory trust organized on March 10, 1999, is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). As an investment company, the Trust follows the accounting and reporting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, Financial Services – Investment Companies. These financial statements report on the Wells Fargo Index Fund (the "Fund") which is a diversified series of the Trust.
The Fund is a feeder fund in a master-feeder structure that invests substantially all of its assets in a single master portfolio with a substantially identical investment objective and substantially similar investment strategies. The Fund invests in Wells Fargo Index Portfolio, a separate diversified portfolio (the “affiliated Master Portfolio”) of Wells Fargo Master Trust, a registered open-end management investment company. As of May 31, 2021, the Fund owned 96.64% of Wells Fargo Index Portfolio. The affiliated Master Portfolio directly acquires portfolio securities and the Fund acquires an indirect interest in those securities. The Fund accounts for its investment in the affiliated Master Portfolio as a partnership investment and records on a daily basis its share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s income, expense and realized and unrealized gains and losses. The financial statements of the affiliated Master Portfolio for the year ended May 31, 2021 are included in this report and should be read in conjunction with the Fund’s financial statements.
On February 23, 2021, Wells Fargo & Company announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management ("WFAM") to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. WFAM is the trade name used by the asset management businesses of Wells Fargo & Company and includes Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the investment manager to the Fund, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, both registered investment advisers providing sub-advisory services to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Fund's principal underwriter. As part of the transaction, Wells Fargo & Company will own a 9.9% equity interest and will continue to serve as an important client and distribution partner.
Consummation of the transaction will result in the automatic termination of the Fund's investment management agreement and subadvisory agreement. The Fund's Board of Trustees approved a new investment management and new subadvisory agreement and approved submitting the agreements to the Fund’s shareholders for approval at a special meeting of shareholders expected to be held on August 16, 2021. Shareholders of record of the Fund at the close of business on May 28, 2021 are entitled to vote at the meeting. If shareholders approve the new agreements, they would take effect upon the closing of the transaction. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
This shareholder report is not asking you for a proxy. A separate proxy statement with more detailed information about the transaction will be provided to Fund shareholders and should be reviewed carefully.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following significant accounting policies, which are consistently followed in the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund, are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Securities valuation
All investments are valued each business day as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4 p.m. Eastern Time), although the Fund may deviate from this calculation time under unusual or unexpected circumstances.
Investments in the affiliated Master Portfolio are valued daily based on the Fund’s proportionate share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s net assets, which are also valued daily. Securities held in the affiliated Master Portfolio are valued as discussed in the Notes to Financial Statements of the affiliated Master Portfolio, which are included elsewhere in this report.
Investments which are not valued using any of the methods discussed above are valued at their fair value, as determined in good faith by the Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees has established a Valuation Committee comprised of the Trustees and has delegated to it the authority to take any actions regarding the valuation of portfolio securities that the Valuation Committee deems necessary or appropriate, including determining the fair value of portfolio securities, unless the determination has been delegated to the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee at Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC ("Funds Management"). The Board of Trustees retains the authority to make or ratify any valuation decisions or approve any changes to the Valuation Procedures as it deems appropriate. On a quarterly basis, the Board of Trustees

18  |  Wells Fargo Index Fund


Notes to financial statements
receives reports on any valuation actions taken by the Valuation Committee or the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee which may include items for ratification.
Investment transactions, income and expenses
Investments in the affiliated Master Portfolio are recorded on a trade date basis. The Fund records daily its proportionate share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s income, expenses and realized and unrealized gains or losses. The Fund also accrues its own expenses.
Distributions to shareholders
Distributions to shareholders from net investment income and any net realized gains are recorded on the ex-dividend date and paid at least annually. Such distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations and may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Dividend sources are estimated at the time of declaration. The tax character of distributions is determined as of the Fund's fiscal year end. Therefore, a portion of the Fund's distributions made prior to the Fund’s fiscal year end may be categorized as a tax return of capital at year end.
Federal and other taxes
The Fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by distributing substantially all of its investment company taxable income and any net realized capital gains (after reduction for capital loss carryforwards) sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes. Accordingly, no provision for federal income taxes was required.
The Fund’s income and federal excise tax returns and all financial records supporting those returns for the prior three fiscal years are subject to examination by the federal and Delaware revenue authorities. Management has analyzed the Fund's tax positions taken on federal, state, and foreign tax returns for all open tax years and does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability.
As of May 31, 2021, the aggregate cost of all investments for federal income tax purposes was $118,028,088 and the unrealized gains (losses) consisted of:
Gross unrealized gains $1,149,801,971
Gross unrealized losses (4,934,540)
Net unrealized gains $1,144,867,431
Class allocations
The separate classes of shares offered by the Fund differ principally in applicable sales charges, distribution, shareholder servicing, and administration fees. Class specific expenses are charged directly to that share class. Investment income, common fund-level expenses, and realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative proportion of net assets of each class.
3. FAIR VALUATION MEASUREMENTS
At May 31, 2021, the Fund’s investment in an affiliated Master Portfolio was measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient. The investment objective and fair value of the affiliated Master Portfolio is as follows:
Affiliated Master Portfolio Investment objective Fair value of affiliated
Master Portfolio
Wells Fargo Index Portfolio Seeks to replicate the total return of the S&P 500 Index, before fees and expenses $1,262,895,519
The affiliated Master Portfolio does not have a redemption period notice, can be redeemed daily and does not have any unfunded commitments.
4. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
Management fee
Funds Management, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company ("Wells Fargo"), is the manager of the Fund and provides advisory and fund-level administrative services under an investment management agreement. Under the investment management agreement, Funds Management is responsible for, among other services, implementing the

Wells Fargo Index Fund  |  19


Notes to financial statements
investment objectives and strategies of the Fund and providing fund-level administrative services in connection with the Fund’s operations. As long as the Fund continues to invest substantially all of its assets in a single affiliated Master Portfolio, the Fund pays Funds Management an investment management fee only for fund-level administrative services at the following annual rate based on the Fund’s average daily net assets:
Average daily net assets Management fee
First $5 billion 0.050%
Next $5 billion 0.040
Over $10 billion 0.030
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the management fee was equivalent to an annual rate of 0.05% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
Funds Management also serves as the adviser to the affiliated Master Portfolio and is entitled to receive a fee from the affiliated Master Portfolio for those services.
Administration fees
Under a class-level administration agreement, Funds Management provides class-level administrative services to the Fund, which includes paying fees and expenses for services provided by the transfer agent, sub-transfer agents, omnibus account servicers and record-keepers. As compensation for its services under the class-level administration agreement, Funds Management receives an annual fee which is calculated based on the average daily net assets of each class as follows:
  Class-level
administration fee
Class A 0.21%
Class C 0.21
Administrator Class 0.13
Waivers and/or expense reimbursements
Funds Management has contractually waived and/or reimbursed management and administration fees to the extent necessary to maintain certain net operating expense ratios for the Fund. When each class of the Fund has exceeded its expense cap, Funds Management has waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses from fund-level expenses on a proportionate basis and then from class specific expenses. When only certain classes exceed their expense caps, waivers and/or reimbursements are applied against class specific expenses before fund-level expenses. Net expenses from the affiliated Master Portfolio are included in the expense caps. Funds Management has committed through September 30, 2021 to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap expenses. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. The contractual expense caps are as follows:
  Expense ratio caps
Class A 0.45%
Class C 1.20
Administrator Class 0.25
Distribution fee
The Trust has adopted a distribution plan for Class C shares of the Fund pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. A distribution fee is charged to Class C shares and paid to Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC ("Funds Distributor"), the principal underwriter, at an annual rate of 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class C shares.
In addition, Funds Distributor is entitled to receive the front-end sales charge from the purchase of Class A shares and a contingent deferred sales charge on the redemption of certain Class A shares. Funds Distributor is also entitled to receive the contingent deferred sales charges from redemptions of Class C shares. Funds Distributor did not receive any front-end or contingent deferred sales charges from Class A or Class C shares for the year ended May 31, 2021.

20  |  Wells Fargo Index Fund


Notes to financial statements
Shareholder servicing fees
The Trust has entered into contracts with one or more shareholder servicing agents, whereby Class A and Class C shares of the Fund are charged a fee at an annual rate of 0.25% of the average daily net assets of each respective class. Administrator Class is charged a fee at an annual rate of 0.10% of its average daily net assets. A portion of these total shareholder servicing fees were paid to affiliates of Wells Fargo.
5. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS
The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing substantially all of its assets in a single affiliated Master Portfolio. Purchases and sales have been calculated by multiplying the Fund's ownership percentage of the affiliated Master Portfolio by the affiliated Master Portfolio's purchases and sales. Purchases and sales of investments, excluding U.S. government obligations (if any) and short-term securities, for the year ended May 31, 2021 were $43,761,665 and $140,350,575, respectively.
6. BANK BORROWINGS
The Trust (excluding the money market funds), Wells Fargo Master Trust and Wells Fargo Variable Trust are parties to a $350,000,000 revolving credit agreement whereby the Fund is permitted to use bank borrowings for temporary or emergency purposes, such as to fund shareholder redemption requests. Interest under the credit agreement is charged to the Fund based on a borrowing rate equal to the higher of the Federal Funds rate in effect on that day plus 1.25% or the overnight LIBOR rate in effect on that day plus 1.25%. In addition, an annual commitment fee equal to 0.25% of the unused balance is allocated to each participating fund.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, there were no borrowings by the Fund under the agreement.
7. DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS
The tax character of distributions paid during the years ended May 31, 2021 and May 31, 2020 were as follows:
  Year ended May 31
  2021 2020
Ordinary income $ 16,705,769 $ 19,604,325
Long-term capital gain 135,360,511 291,185,256
As of May 31, 2021, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Undistributed
ordinary
income
Undistributed
long-term
gain
Unrealized
gains
$9,437,246 $59,939,047 $1,144,867,431
8. CONCENTRATION RISKS
Concentration risks result from exposure to a limited number of sectors. Through its investment in the affiliated Master Portfolio which may invest a substantial portion of its assets in any sector, the Fund may in turn be more affected by changes in that sector than a fund whose investments are not heavily weighted in any sector. As of the end of the period, the affiliated Master Portfolio concentrated its portfolio in investments related to the information technology sector.
9. INDEMNIFICATION
Under the Fund's organizational documents, the officers and Trustees have been granted certain indemnification rights against certain liabilities that may arise out of performance of their duties to the Fund. The Fund has entered into a separate agreement with each Trustee that converts indemnification rights currently existing under the Fund’s organizational documents into contractual rights that cannot be changed in the future without the consent of the Trustee. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with service providers that contain a variety of indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent on future claims that may be made against the Fund and, therefore, cannot be estimated.

Wells Fargo Index Fund  |  21


Notes to financial statements
10. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
In August 2018, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 updates the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Management has adopted this guidance which did not have a material impact on the financial statements.
11. CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization announced that it had made the assessment that coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) is a pandemic. The impacts of COVID-19 are affecting the entire global economy, individual companies and investment products, the funds, and the market in general. There is significant uncertainty around the extent and duration of business disruptions related to COVID-19 and the impacts may last for an extended period of time. COVID-19 has led to significant uncertainty and volatility in the financial markets.
12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
At a meeting held July 15, 2021, the Board of Trustees of the Wells Fargo Funds approved a change in the Fund's name to remove “Wells Fargo” from the Fund's name and replace with “Allspring”. The change is expected to go into effect on October 11, 2021.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) announced that it will be changing its company name to Allspring Global Investments upon the closing of the previously announced sale transaction of WFAM by Wells Fargo & Company to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. The new corporate name is expected to go into effect on the closing date of the transaction, which is anticipated to occur in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
Following the closing of the transaction, Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the Fund's investment manager, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, each sub-advisers to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Fund's principal underwriter, will each be rebranded as Allspring.

22  |  Wells Fargo Index Fund


Report of independent registered public accounting firm
To the Shareholders of the Fund and Board of Trustees
Wells Fargo Funds Trust:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Wells Fargo Index Fund (the Fund), one of the funds constituting Wells Fargo Funds Trust, including the portfolio of investments, as of May 31, 2021, the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the financial statements) and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of May 31, 2021, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Fund in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and financial highlights, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. Such procedures also included confirmation of securities owned as of May 31, 2021, by correspondence with the transfer agent. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and financial highlights. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have not been able to determine the specific year that we began serving as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies; however, we are aware that we have served as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies since at least 1955.
Boston, Massachusetts
July 28, 2021

Wells Fargo Index Fund  |  23


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Common stocks:  98.56%          
Communication services:  10.94%          
Diversified telecommunication services: 1.27%           
AT&T Incorporated          258,045 $     7,594,264
Lumen Technologies Incorporated           35,718       494,337
Verizon Communications Incorporated          149,729     8,458,191
             16,546,792
Entertainment: 1.93%           
Activision Blizzard Incorporated           28,033     2,726,209
Electronic Arts Incorporated           10,407     1,487,473
Live Nation Entertainment Incorporated            5,193       467,941
Netflix Incorporated           16,025     8,057,530
Take-Two Interactive Software Incorporated            4,167       773,229
The Walt Disney Company           65,681    11,733,911
             25,246,293
Interactive media & services: 6.20%           
Alphabet Incorporated Class A           10,881    25,644,885
Alphabet Incorporated Class C           10,430    25,152,571
Facebook Incorporated Class A           87,035    28,611,016
Twitter Incorporated           28,879     1,674,982
             81,083,454
Media: 1.31%           
Charter Communications Incorporated Class A            5,117     3,553,910
Comcast Corporation Class A          165,398     9,483,921
Discovery Incorporated Class A †«       5,879 188,775
Discovery Incorporated Class C       10,481 314,954
DISH Network Corporation Class A       8,953 389,635
Fox Corporation Class A       12,098 451,860
Fox Corporation Class B       5,562 201,789
Interpublic Group of Companies Incorporated       14,136 476,242
News Corporation Class A       14,151 381,935
News Corporation Class B       4,406 113,190
Omnicom Group Incorporated       7,780 639,827
ViacomCBS Incorporated Class B       21,259 901,807
          17,097,845
Wireless telecommunication services: 0.23%           
T-Mobile US Incorporated       21,135 2,989,546
Consumer discretionary:  11.93%          
Auto components: 0.15%           
Aptiv plc       9,770 1,469,603
BorgWarner Incorporated       8,648 443,556
          1,913,159
Automobiles: 1.69%           
Ford Motor Company       141,396 2,054,484
General Motors Company       45,880 2,721,143
Tesla Motors Incorporated       27,784 17,371,112
          22,146,739
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

24  |  Wells Fargo Index Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Distributors: 0.14%           
Genuine Parts Company            5,225 $       685,102
LKQ Corporation           10,097       514,543
Pool Corporation            1,456       635,617
              1,835,262
Hotels, restaurants & leisure: 2.08%           
Booking Holdings Incorporated            1,482     3,499,817
Caesars Entertainment Incorporated            7,536       809,743
Carnival Corporation           28,867       853,309
Chipotle Mexican Grill Incorporated            1,018     1,396,676
Darden Restaurants Incorporated            4,716       675,473
Domino's Pizza Incorporated            1,404       599,325
Expedia Group Incorporated            5,006       885,812
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Incorporated           10,045     1,258,337
Las Vegas Sands Corporation           11,884       686,301
Marriott International Incorporated Class A            9,625     1,381,958
McDonald's Corporation           26,977     6,309,651
MGM Resorts International           14,861       637,091
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Limited           13,142       419,230
Penn National Gaming Incorporated            5,379       440,917
Royal Caribbean Cruises Limited            7,921       738,792
Starbucks Corporation           42,598     4,851,060
Wynn Resorts Limited            3,807       502,029
Yum! Brands Incorporated           10,857     1,302,514
          27,248,035
Household durables: 0.44%           
D.R. Horton Incorporated       11,975 1,141,098
Garmin Limited       5,407 769,092
Leggett & Platt Incorporated       4,812 264,804
Lennar Corporation Class A       9,932 983,367
Mohawk Industries Incorporated       2,134 449,591
Newell Rubbermaid Incorporated       13,673 392,278
NVR Incorporated       125 610,904
PulteGroup Incorporated       9,621 555,998
Whirlpool Corporation       2,271 538,431
          5,705,563
Internet & direct marketing retail: 3.99%           
Amazon.com Incorporated       15,487 49,915,685
eBay Incorporated       23,389 1,423,922
Etsy Incorporated       4,561 751,334
          52,090,941
Leisure products: 0.03%           
Hasbro Incorporated       4,622 443,573
Multiline retail: 0.52%           
Dollar General Corporation       8,865 1,799,240
Dollar Tree Incorporated       8,510 829,725
Target Corporation       18,123 4,112,471
          6,741,436
Specialty retail: 2.22%           
Advance Auto Parts Incorporated       2,371 449,850
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Index Portfolio  |  25


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Specialty retail (continued)          
AutoZone Incorporated              803 $     1,129,500
Best Buy Company Incorporated            8,339       969,325
CarMax Incorporated            5,881       677,432
L Brands Incorporated            8,453       590,611
Lowe's Companies Incorporated           26,449     5,153,059
O'Reilly Automotive Incorporated            2,540     1,359,205
Ross Stores Incorporated           12,881     1,628,030
The Gap Incorporated            7,443       248,968
The Home Depot Incorporated           38,954    12,422,820
The TJX Companies Incorporated           43,442     2,934,073
Tractor Supply Company            4,208       764,594
Ulta Beauty Incorporated            2,038       703,844
             29,031,311
Textiles, apparel & luxury goods: 0.67%           
HanesBrands Incorporated           12,621       246,614
Nike Incorporated Class B           46,005     6,277,842
PVH Corporation            2,573       295,432
Ralph Lauren Corporation            1,745       216,520
Tapestry Incorporated           10,053       451,279
Under Armour Incorporated Class A            6,825       154,109
Under Armour Incorporated Class C            7,051       134,392
VF Corporation           11,622       926,506
              8,702,694
Consumer staples:  5.94%          
Beverages: 1.44%           
Brown-Forman Corporation Class B       6,609 531,099
Constellation Brands Incorporated Class A       6,152 1,474,757
Molson Coors Brewing Company Class B       6,811 397,218
Monster Beverage Corporation       13,377 1,261,050
PepsiCo Incorporated       49,918 7,384,869
The Coca-Cola Company       140,330 7,758,846
          18,807,839
Food & staples retailing: 1.31%           
Costco Wholesale Corporation       16,016 6,058,372
Sysco Corporation       18,468 1,495,908
The Kroger Company       27,547 1,018,688
Walgreens Boots Alliance Incorporated       25,948 1,366,422
Walmart Incorporated       50,162 7,124,509
          17,063,899
Food products: 0.97%           
Archer Daniels Midland Company       20,205 1,344,239
Campbell Soup Company       7,344 357,432
ConAgra Foods Incorporated       17,678 673,532
General Mills Incorporated       22,123 1,390,652
Hormel Foods Corporation       10,163 493,312
Kellogg Company       9,209 603,097
Lamb Weston Holdings Incorporated       5,295 436,785
McCormick & Company Incorporated       9,007 802,163
Mondelez International Incorporated Class A       51,094 3,246,002
The Hershey Company       5,303 917,684
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

26  |  Wells Fargo Index Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Food products (continued)          
The J.M. Smucker Company            3,965 $       528,495
The Kraft Heinz Company           23,457     1,022,491
Tyson Foods Incorporated Class A           10,664       847,788
             12,663,672
Household products: 1.36%           
Church & Dwight Company Incorporated            8,868       760,254
Colgate-Palmolive Company           30,703     2,572,297
Kimberly-Clark Corporation           12,230     1,597,605
The Clorox Company            4,551       804,298
The Procter & Gamble Company           89,099    12,015,000
             17,749,454
Personal products: 0.19%           
The Estee Lauder Companies Incorporated Class A            8,312     2,547,794
Tobacco: 0.67%           
Altria Group Incorporated           67,252     3,310,143
Philip Morris International Incorporated           56,348     5,433,638
              8,743,781
Energy:  2.75%          
Energy equipment & services: 0.24%           
Baker Hughes Incorporated           26,376       643,574
Halliburton Company           32,153       721,835
NOV Incorporated           14,046       226,422
Schlumberger Limited           50,593     1,585,079
          3,176,910
Oil, gas & consumable fuels: 2.51%           
APA Corporation       13,672 284,378
Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation       14,452 237,013
Chevron Corporation       69,870 7,251,807
ConocoPhillips       49,018 2,732,263
Devon Energy Corporation       21,431 569,207
Diamondback Energy Incorporated       6,542 523,818
EOG Resources Incorporated       21,115 1,696,379
Exxon Mobil Corporation       153,178 8,941,000
Hess Corporation       9,886 828,645
HollyFrontier Corporation       5,406 175,533
Kinder Morgan Incorporated       70,442 1,291,906
Marathon Oil Corporation       28,562 345,886
Marathon Petroleum Corporation       23,565 1,456,317
Occidental Petroleum Corporation       30,335 787,497
ONEOK Incorporated       16,101 849,167
Phillips 66       15,805 1,331,097
Pioneer Natural Resources Company       7,445 1,133,055
The Williams Companies Incorporated       43,918 1,156,800
Valero Energy Corporation       14,783 1,188,553
          32,780,321
Financials:  11.75%          
Banks: 4.59%           
Bank of America Corporation       274,886 11,652,418
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Index Portfolio  |  27


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Banks (continued)          
Citigroup Incorporated           75,524 $     5,944,494
Citizens Financial Group Incorporated           15,381       767,512
Comerica Incorporated            5,035       395,197
Fifth Third Bancorp           25,727     1,084,136
First Republic Bank            6,367     1,218,898
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated           36,807       583,759
JPMorgan Chase & Company          110,411    18,133,903
KeyCorp           35,054       807,644
M&T Bank Corporation            4,654       747,851
People's United Financial Incorporated           15,397       291,157
PNC Financial Services Group Incorporated           15,342     2,986,781
Regions Financial Corporation           34,760       813,732
SVB Financial Group            1,953     1,138,384
Truist Financial Corporation           48,745     3,011,466
US Bancorp           49,460     3,006,179
Wells Fargo & Company          149,583     6,988,518
Zions Bancorporation            5,942       343,923
             59,915,952
Capital markets: 3.00%           
Ameriprise Financial Incorporated            4,224     1,097,564
Bank of New York Mellon Corporation           29,192     1,520,319
BlackRock Incorporated            5,136     4,504,477
Cboe Global Markets Incorporated            3,879       431,733
CME Group Incorporated       12,990 2,841,692
Franklin Resources Incorporated       9,875 337,824
Intercontinental Exchange Incorporated       20,324 2,294,173
Invesco Limited       13,621 388,607
MarketAxess Holdings Incorporated       1,375 641,493
Moody's Corporation       5,822 1,952,408
Morgan Stanley       54,297 4,938,312
MSCI Incorporated       2,988 1,398,772
Northern Trust Corporation       7,537 913,409
Raymond James Financial Incorporated       4,435 588,037
S&P Global Incorporated       8,709 3,304,804
State Street Corporation       12,729 1,107,168
T. Rowe Price Group Incorporated       8,248 1,578,255
The Charles Schwab Corporation       54,148 3,998,830
The Goldman Sachs Group Incorporated       12,449 4,631,277
The NASDAQ Incorporated       4,174 698,978
          39,168,132
Consumer finance: 0.66%           
American Express Company       23,610 3,780,669
Capital One Financial Corporation       16,616 2,671,520
Discover Financial Services       11,097 1,301,234
Synchrony Financial       19,651 931,654
          8,685,077
Diversified financial services: 1.53%           
Berkshire Hathaway Incorporated Class B       68,989 19,968,176
Insurance: 1.97%           
AFLAC Incorporated       23,171 1,313,332
American International Group Incorporated       31,290 1,653,364
Aon plc Class A       8,177 2,071,806
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

28  |  Wells Fargo Index Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Insurance (continued)          
Arthur J. Gallagher & Company            7,413 $     1,086,820
Assurant Incorporated            2,095       337,609
Chubb Limited           16,290     2,769,137
Cincinnati Financial Corporation            5,424       660,155
Everest Reinsurance Group Limited            1,447       376,162
Globe Life Incorporated            3,438       362,434
Lincoln National Corporation            6,529       455,659
Loews Corporation            8,213       479,475
Marsh & McLennan Companies Incorporated           18,388     2,543,980
MetLife Incorporated           27,200     1,777,792
Principal Financial Group Incorporated            9,173       599,822
Progressive Corporation           21,194     2,099,902
Prudential Financial Incorporated           14,364     1,536,517
The Allstate Corporation           10,959     1,497,109
The Hartford Financial Services Group Incorporated           12,936       845,368
The Travelers Companies Incorporated            9,126     1,457,422
UnumProvident Corporation            7,372       228,311
W.R. Berkley Corporation            5,070       395,409
Willis Towers Watson plc            4,667     1,219,767
             25,767,352
Health care:  12.78%          
Biotechnology: 1.72%           
AbbVie Incorporated           63,894     7,232,801
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Incorporated       7,955 1,404,455
Amgen Incorporated       20,898 4,972,470
Biogen Incorporated       5,512 1,474,350
Gilead Sciences Incorporated       45,467 3,005,823
Incyte Corporation       6,761 566,437
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Incorporated       3,809 1,913,756
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated       9,406 1,962,374
          22,532,466
Health care equipment & supplies: 3.51%           
Abbott Laboratories       64,098 7,477,032
ABIOMED Incorporated       1,637 465,857
Align Technology Incorporated       2,606 1,537,931
Baxter International Incorporated       18,276 1,500,825
Becton Dickinson & Company       10,513 2,542,990
Boston Scientific Corporation       51,277 2,181,836
Danaher Corporation       22,935 5,874,571
Dentsply Sirona Incorporated       7,926 530,408
DexCom Incorporated       3,480 1,285,477
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation       22,597 2,167,052
Hologic Incorporated       9,323 587,908
IDEXX Laboratories Incorporated       3,091 1,725,118
Intuitive Surgical Incorporated       4,259 3,586,845
Medtronic plc       48,777 6,174,680
ResMed Incorporated       5,265 1,083,800
STERIS plc       3,088 589,376
Stryker Corporation       11,842 3,022,907
Teleflex Incorporated       1,689 679,299
The Cooper Companies Incorporated       1,778 699,554
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Index Portfolio  |  29


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Health care equipment & supplies (continued)          
West Pharmaceutical Services Incorporated            2,681 $       931,674
Zimmer Biomet Holdings Incorporated            7,521     1,266,010
             45,911,150
Health care providers & services: 2.73%           
AmerisourceBergen Corporation            5,333       611,908
Anthem Incorporated            8,861     3,528,627
Cardinal Health Incorporated           10,626       595,800
Centene Corporation           21,044     1,548,838
Cigna Corporation           12,731     3,295,419
CVS Health Corporation           47,448     4,101,405
DaVita HealthCare Partners Incorporated            2,613       313,743
HCA Healthcare Incorporated            9,593     2,060,480
Henry Schein Incorporated            5,155       391,986
Humana Incorporated            4,663     2,040,995
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings            3,531       969,189
McKesson Corporation            5,753     1,106,820
Quest Diagnostics Incorporated            4,829       635,834
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated           34,204    14,089,312
Universal Health Services Incorporated Class B            2,816       449,518
             35,739,874
Health care technology: 0.07%           
Cerner Corporation           11,082       867,167
Life sciences tools & services: 1.19%           
Agilent Technologies Incorporated       11,025 1,522,883
Bio-Rad Laboratories Incorporated Class A       780 469,849
Charles River Laboratories International Incorporated       1,801 608,720
Illumina Incorporated       5,279 2,141,374
IQVIA Holdings Incorporated       6,921 1,662,147
Mettler-Toledo International Incorporated       847 1,101,905
PerkinElmer Incorporated       4,055 588,259
Thermo Fisher Scientific Incorporated       14,248 6,689,436
Waters Corporation       2,250 725,063
          15,509,636
Pharmaceuticals: 3.56%           
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company       81,066 5,327,658
Catalent Incorporated       6,159 645,648
Eli Lilly & Company       28,783 5,749,116
Johnson & Johnson       95,112 16,097,706
Merck & Company Incorporated       91,553 6,947,957
Perrigo Company plc       4,816 222,210
Pfizer Incorporated       201,813 7,816,217
Viatris Incorporated       43,675 665,607
Zoetis Incorporated       17,193 3,037,659
          46,509,778
Industrials:  8.81%          
Aerospace & defense: 1.67%           
General Dynamics Corporation       8,390 1,593,345
Howmet Aerospace Incorporated       14,120 500,978
Huntington Ingalls Industries Incorporated       1,457 315,018
L3Harris Technologies Incorporated       7,438 1,621,930
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

30  |  Wells Fargo Index Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Aerospace & defense (continued)          
Lockheed Martin Corporation            8,919 $     3,408,842
Northrop Grumman Corporation            5,610     2,052,531
Raytheon Technologies Corporation           54,979     4,877,187
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated            1,679       704,290
Textron Incorporated            8,211       562,207
The Boeing Company           19,851     4,903,594
TransDigm Group Incorporated            1,979     1,284,054
             21,823,976
Air freight & logistics: 0.73%           
C.H. Robinson Worldwide Incorporated            4,842       469,771
Expeditors International of Washington Incorporated            6,128       770,228
FedEx Corporation            8,824     2,777,883
United Parcel Service Incorporated Class B           26,034     5,586,896
              9,604,778
Airlines: 0.30%           
Alaska Air Group Incorporated            4,495       311,054
American Airlines Group Incorporated           23,145       561,035
Delta Air Lines Incorporated           23,090     1,100,931
Southwest Airlines Company           21,372     1,313,523
United Airlines Holdings Incorporated           11,523       672,367
              3,958,910
Building products: 0.50%           
A.O. Smith Corporation            4,900       348,243
Allegion plc       3,283 461,196
Carrier Global Corporation       29,566 1,357,966
Fortune Brands Home & Security Incorporated       5,017 517,554
Johnson Controls International plc       26,061 1,734,099
Masco Corporation       9,304 561,124
Trane Technologies plc       8,627 1,608,073
          6,588,255
Commercial services & supplies: 0.40%           
Cintas Corporation       3,192 1,128,500
Copart Incorporated       7,524 970,671
Republic Services Incorporated       7,615 831,406
Rollins Incorporated       8,013 273,163
Waste Management Incorporated       14,086 1,981,618
          5,185,358
Construction & engineering: 0.04%           
Quanta Services Incorporated       5,006 477,322
Electrical equipment: 0.55%           
AMETEK Incorporated       8,342 1,127,004
Eaton Corporation plc       14,404 2,092,181
Emerson Electric Company       21,711 2,077,526
Generac Holdings Incorporated       2,274 747,509
Rockwell Automation Incorporated       4,203 1,108,415
          7,152,635
Industrial conglomerates: 1.24%           
3M Company       20,953 4,254,297
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Index Portfolio  |  31


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Industrial conglomerates (continued)          
General Electric Company          317,247 $     4,460,493
Honeywell International Incorporated           25,165     5,810,850
Roper Technologies Incorporated            3,797     1,708,688
             16,234,328
Machinery: 1.75%           
Caterpillar Incorporated           19,730     4,756,508
Cummins Incorporated            5,355     1,377,734
Deere & Company           11,341     4,095,235
Dover Corporation            5,198       782,299
Fortive Corporation           12,232       887,065
IDEX Corporation            2,746       611,424
Illinois Tool Works Incorporated           10,426     2,416,330
Ingersoll Rand Incorporated           13,485       669,395
Otis Worldwide Corporation           14,750     1,155,368
PACCAR Incorporated           12,553     1,149,353
Parker-Hannifin Corporation            4,670     1,439,061
Pentair plc            6,009       414,441
Snap-on Incorporated            1,961       499,310
Stanley Black & Decker Incorporated            5,822     1,262,210
Wabtec Corporation            6,425       531,733
Xylem Incorporated            6,526       770,851
             22,818,317
Professional services: 0.41%           
Equifax Incorporated       4,407 1,035,821
IHS Markit Limited       13,489 1,420,527
Jacobs Engineering Group Incorporated       4,707 668,771
Leidos Holdings Incorporated       4,826 495,872
Nielsen Holdings plc       12,946 352,261
Robert Half International Incorporated       4,093 363,417
Verisk Analytics Incorporated       5,890 1,017,969
          5,354,638
Road & rail: 1.01%           
CSX Corporation       27,589 2,762,211
J.B. Hunt Transport Services Incorporated       3,021 518,222
Kansas City Southern       3,287 978,474
Norfolk Southern Corporation       9,115 2,560,404
Old Dominion Freight Line Incorporated       3,469 920,846
Union Pacific Corporation       24,236 5,446,556
          13,186,713
Trading companies & distributors: 0.21%           
Fastenal Company       20,781 1,102,224
United Rentals Incorporated       2,612 872,304
W.W. Grainger Incorporated       1,592 735,759
          2,710,287
Information technology:  25.85%          
Communications equipment: 0.82%           
Arista Networks Incorporated       1,989 675,027
Cisco Systems Incorporated       152,755 8,080,740
F5 Networks Incorporated       2,231 413,694
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

32  |  Wells Fargo Index Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Communications equipment (continued)          
Juniper Networks Incorporated           11,874 $       312,642
Motorola Solutions Incorporated            6,116     1,255,676
             10,737,779
Electronic equipment, instruments & components: 0.61%           
Amphenol Corporation Class A           21,679     1,458,130
CDW Corporation of Delaware            5,101       843,807
Corning Incorporated           27,802     1,213,001
IPG Photonics Corporation            1,298       271,619
Keysight Technologies Incorporated            6,733       958,645
TE Connectivity Limited           11,972     1,624,361
Trimble Incorporated            9,081       706,411
Zebra Technologies Corporation Class A            1,935       961,792
              8,037,766
IT services: 5.04%           
Accenture plc Class A           22,949     6,475,290
Akamai Technologies Incorporated            5,906       674,524
Automatic Data Processing Incorporated           15,484     3,035,174
Broadridge Financial Solutions Incorporated            4,190       668,221
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation Class A           19,199     1,373,880
DXC Technology Company            9,212       349,319
Fidelity National Information Services Incorporated           22,474     3,348,177
Fiserv Incorporated           21,550     2,482,560
FleetCor Technologies Incorporated            3,018       828,260
Gartner Incorporated       3,210 744,206
Global Payments Incorporated       10,683 2,069,404
International Business Machines Corporation       32,333 4,647,545
Jack Henry & Associates Incorporated       2,753 424,375
MasterCard Incorporated Class A       31,724 11,439,040
Paychex Incorporated       11,613 1,174,539
PayPal Holdings Incorporated       42,376 11,018,608
The Western Union Company       14,868 363,820
VeriSign Incorporated       3,601 791,932
Visa Incorporated Class A       61,370 13,949,401
          65,858,275
Semiconductors & semiconductor equipment: 5.37%           
Advanced Micro Devices Incorporated       43,846 3,511,188
Analog Devices Incorporated       13,348 2,197,081
Applied Materials Incorporated       33,203 4,586,330
Broadcom Incorporated       14,771 6,976,786
Enphase Energy Incorporated       4,668 667,757
Intel Corporation       147,010 8,397,211
KLA Corporation       5,575 1,766,662
Lam Research Corporation       5,171 3,360,374
Maxim Integrated Products Incorporated       9,698 989,293
Microchip Technology Incorporated       9,743 1,529,164
Micron Technology Incorporated       40,476 3,405,651
Monolithic Power Systems Incorporated       1,552 532,522
NVIDIA Corporation       22,433 14,576,515
NXP Semiconductors NV       10,023 2,119,063
Qorvo Incorporated       4,098 748,787
QUALCOMM Incorporated       41,103 5,529,998
Skyworks Solutions Incorporated       5,967 1,014,390
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Index Portfolio  |  33


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Semiconductors & semiconductor equipment (continued)          
Teradyne Incorporated            6,031 $       798,203
Texas Instruments Incorporated           33,297     6,320,437
Xilinx Incorporated            8,892     1,129,284
             70,156,696
Software: 8.24%           
Adobe Incorporated           17,343     8,750,931
ANSYS Incorporated            3,139     1,060,794
Autodesk Incorporated            7,956     2,274,302
Cadence Design Systems Incorporated           10,094     1,281,837
Citrix Systems Incorporated            4,449       511,457
Fortinet Incorporated            4,901     1,071,065
Intuit Incorporated            9,908     4,350,504
Microsoft Corporation          272,897    68,136,923
NortonLifeLock Incorporated           21,055       582,381
Oracle Corporation           67,109     5,284,163
Paycom Software Incorporated            1,776       585,370
PTC Incorporated            3,804       510,269
Salesforce.com Incorporated           33,206     7,906,349
ServiceNow Incorporated            7,095     3,362,179
Synopsys Incorporated            5,513     1,402,176
Tyler Technologies Incorporated            1,468       591,839
            107,662,539
Technology hardware, storage & peripherals: 5.77%           
Apple Incorporated       570,990 71,151,064
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company       47,079 751,381
HP Incorporated       45,320 1,324,704
NetApp Incorporated       8,054 623,138
Seagate Technology Holdings plc       7,268 695,911
Western Digital Corporation       11,075 833,172
          75,379,370
Materials:  2.78%          
Chemicals: 1.88%           
Air Products & Chemicals Incorporated       8,006 2,399,078
Albemarle Corporation       4,220 705,078
Celanese Corporation Series A       4,131 683,474
CF Industries Holdings Incorporated       7,743 411,695
Corteva Incorporated       26,922 1,224,951
Dow Incorporated       26,964 1,844,877
DuPont de Nemours Incorporated       19,480 1,647,813
Eastman Chemical Company       4,916 616,466
Ecolab Incorporated       8,998 1,935,290
FMC Corporation       4,680 546,109
International Flavors & Fragrances Incorporated       9,000 1,275,030
Linde plc       18,918 5,686,746
LyondellBasell Industries NV Class A       9,309 1,048,380
PPG Industries Incorporated       8,573 1,540,740
The Mosaic Company       12,482 451,099
The Sherwin-Williams Company       8,754 2,482,022
          24,498,848
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

34  |  Wells Fargo Index Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Construction materials: 0.13%           
Martin Marietta Materials Incorporated            2,254 $       819,667
Vulcan Materials Company            4,796       879,203
              1,698,870
Containers & packaging: 0.35%           
Amcor plc           56,516       666,889
Avery Dennison Corporation            3,004       662,472
Ball Corporation           11,865       974,828
International Paper Company           14,223       897,471
Packaging Corporation of America            3,431       510,018
Sealed Air Corporation            5,605       318,700
WestRock Company            9,535       556,081
              4,586,459
Metals & mining: 0.42%           
Freeport-McMoRan Incorporated           52,772     2,254,420
Newmont Corporation           28,957     2,127,760
Nucor Corporation           10,784     1,105,791
              5,487,971
Real estate:  2.51%          
Equity REITs: 2.43%           
Alexandria Real Estate Equities Incorporated            4,600       819,996
American Tower Corporation           16,419     4,194,398
AvalonBay Communities Incorporated            5,048     1,044,633
Boston Properties Incorporated            5,130       603,083
Crown Castle International Corporation       15,606 2,957,337
Digital Realty Trust Incorporated       10,172 1,541,668
Duke Realty Corporation       13,524 628,325
Equinix Incorporated       3,231 2,380,342
Equity Residential       12,405 960,767
Essex Property Trust Incorporated       2,352 694,522
Extra Space Storage Incorporated       4,777 715,642
Federal Realty Investment Trust       2,527 288,937
Healthpeak Properties Incorporated       19,491 650,610
Host Hotels & Resorts Incorporated       25,522 438,213
Iron Mountain Incorporated       10,436 454,383
Kimco Realty Corporation       15,647 333,438
Mid-America Apartment Communities Incorporated       4,139 665,137
Prologis Incorporated       26,757 3,153,045
Public Storage Incorporated       5,502 1,554,205
Realty Income Corporation       13,510 924,084
Regency Centers Corporation       5,715 369,189
SBA Communications Corporation       3,956 1,179,363
Simon Property Group Incorporated       11,886 1,527,232
UDR Incorporated       10,740 511,546
Ventas Incorporated       13,556 751,680
Vornado Realty Trust       5,677 268,409
Welltower Incorporated       15,102 1,129,177
Weyerhaeuser Company       27,056 1,027,046
          31,766,407
Real estate management & development: 0.08%           
CBRE Group Incorporated Class A       12,143 1,065,913
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Index Portfolio  |  35


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Utilities:  2.52%          
Electric utilities: 1.58%           
Alliant Energy Corporation            9,041 $       516,693
American Electric Power Company Incorporated           17,968     1,545,248
Duke Energy Corporation           27,812     2,787,319
Edison International           13,723       766,704
Entergy Corporation            7,254       763,556
Evergy Incorporated            8,211       509,000
Eversource Energy           12,411     1,007,649
Exelon Corporation           35,326     1,593,909
FirstEnergy Corporation           19,655       745,121
NextEra Energy Incorporated           70,913     5,192,250
NRG Energy Incorporated            8,853       284,624
Pinnacle West Capital Corporation            4,077       344,833
PPL Corporation           27,824       809,957
The Southern Company           38,231     2,443,726
Xcel Energy Incorporated           19,454     1,378,900
             20,689,489
Gas utilities: 0.03%           
Atmos Energy Corporation            4,637       459,851
Independent power & renewable electricity producers: 0.05%           
AES Corporation           24,174       614,261
Multi-utilities: 0.78%           
Ameren Corporation            9,167       771,861
CenterPoint Energy Incorporated       19,958 504,937
CMS Energy Corporation       10,455 655,947
Consolidated Edison Incorporated       12,390 957,004
Dominion Energy Incorporated       29,150 2,219,481
DTE Energy Company       7,011 967,448
NiSource Incorporated       14,178 361,539
Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated       18,276 1,135,305
Sempra Energy       11,394 1,543,773
WEC Energy Group Incorporated       11,413 1,071,795
          10,189,090
Water utilities: 0.08%           
American Water Works Company Incorporated       6,565 1,017,706
Total Common stocks (Cost $297,667,405)         1,287,933,880
    
    Yield      
Short-term investments:  1.14%          
Investment companies:  1.14%          
Securities Lending Cash Investments LLC ♠∩∞   0.03%      182,600       182,600
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class ♠∞   0.03   14,730,757    14,730,757
Total Short-term investments (Cost $14,913,357)            14,913,357
Total investments in securities (Cost $312,580,762) 99.70%       1,302,847,237
Other assets and liabilities, net 0.30           3,948,487
Total net assets 100.00%       $1,306,795,724
    
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

36  |  Wells Fargo Index Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

Non-income-earning security
« All or a portion of this security is on loan.
The issuer is an affiliate of the Portfolio as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The investment is a non-registered investment company purchased with cash collateral received from securities on loan.
The rate represents the 7-day annualized yield at period end.
    
Abbreviations:
REIT Real estate investment trust
Investments in affiliates
An affiliated investment is an investment in which the Portfolio owns at least 5% of the outstanding voting shares of the issuer or as a result of other relationships, such as the Portfolio and the issuer having the same adviser or investment manager. Transactions with issuers that were either affiliates of the Portfolio at the beginning of the period or the end of the period were as follows:
  Value,
beginning of
period
Purchases Sales
proceeds
Net
realized
gains
(losses)
  Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses)
  Value,
end of
period
  % of
net
assets
Shares,
end
of period
Income
from
affiliated
securities
Common stocks                      
Financials                  
Banks                  
Wells Fargo & Company $ 4,100,362 $ 374,345 $ (576,645) $ 54,959   $ 3,035,497   $ 6,988,518   0.54% 149,583 $ 61,288
Short-term investments                        
Investment
companies
                       
Securities Lending Cash Investments LLC 0 12,799,719 (12,617,119) 0   0   182,600     182,600 490 #
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class 30,205,942 131,504,451 (146,979,636) 0   0   14,730,757     14,730,757 11,920
                14,913,357   1.14    
        $54,959   $3,035,497   $21,901,875   1.68%   $73,698
    
# Amount shown represents income before fees and rebates.
Futures contracts
Description Number of
contracts
Expiration
date
Notional
cost
Notional
value
Unrealized
gains
Unrealized
losses
Long            
E-Mini S&P 500 Index 89 6-18-2021 $17,508,915 $18,700,680 $1,191,765 $0
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Index Portfolio  |  37


Statement of assets and liabilities—May 31, 2021
   
Assets  
Investments in unaffiliated securities (including $176,605 of securities loaned), at value (cost $294,318,910)

$ 1,280,945,362
Investments in affiliated securites, at value (cost $18,261,852)

21,901,875
Cash

8,210
Cash due from broker

2,475,001
Receivable for dividends

1,664,137
Receivable for daily variation margin on open futures contracts

15,124
Receivable for securities lending income, net

61
Prepaid expenses and other assets

132,901
Total assets

1,307,142,671
Liabilities  
Payable upon receipt of securities loaned

182,600
Advisory fee payable

104,137
Payable for investments purchased

60,210
Total liabilities

346,947
Total net assets

$1,306,795,724
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

38  |  Wells Fargo Index Portfolio


Statement of operations—year ended May 31, 2021
   
Investment income  
Dividends (net of foreign withholdings taxes of $92,365)

$ 17,966,139
Income from affiliated securities

78,419
Interest

1,009
Total investment income

18,045,567
Expenses  
Advisory fee

1,138,374
Custody and accounting fees

71,073
Professional fees

52,135
Interest holder report expenses

7,451
Trustees’ fees and expenses

19,165
Other fees and expenses

33,487
Total expenses

1,321,685
Net investment income

16,723,882
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments  
Net realized gains on  
Unaffiliated securities

94,343,110
Affiliated securities

54,959
Futures contracts

10,037,956
Net realized gains on investments

104,436,025
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on  
Unaffiliated securities

273,073,751
Affiliated securities

3,035,497
Futures contracts

526,094
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

276,635,342
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

381,071,367
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

$397,795,249
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Index Portfolio  |  39


Statement of changes in net assets
     
  Year ended
May 31, 2021
Year ended
May 31, 2020
Operations    
Net investment income

$ 16,723,882 $ 20,718,704
Net realized gains on investments

104,436,025 187,218,582
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

276,635,342 (66,539,266)
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

397,795,249 141,398,020
Capital transactions    
Transactions in investors’ beneficial interests    
Contributions

13,277,558 47,457,547
Withdrawals

(159,782,351) (328,736,831)
Net decrease in net assets resulting from capital transactions

(146,504,793) (281,279,284)
Total increase (decrease) in net assets

251,290,456 (139,881,264)
Net assets    
Beginning of period

1,055,505,268 1,195,386,532
End of period

$1,306,795,724 $1,055,505,268
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

40  |  Wells Fargo Index Portfolio


Financial highlights
  Year ended May 31
  2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Total return

40.16% 12.74% 3.67% 14.27% 17.36%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)          
Gross expenses

0.11% 0.12% 0.11% 0.10% 0.10%
Net expenses

0.11% 0.12% 0.11% 0.10% 0.10%
Net investment income

1.41% 1.80% 1.86% 1.84% 2.03%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate

4% 3% 4% 3% 9%
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Index Portfolio  |  41


Notes to financial statements
1. ORGANIZATION
Wells Fargo Master Trust (the "Trust"), a Delaware statutory trust organized on March 10, 1999, is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). As an investment company, the Trust follows the accounting and reporting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, Financial Services – Investment Companies. These financial statements report on the Wells Fargo Index Portfolio (the "Portfolio") which is a diversified series of the Trust.
Interests in the Portfolio are available solely through private placement transactions that do not involve any "public offering" within the meaning of Section 4(2) of the Investment Company Act of 1933.
On February 23, 2021, Wells Fargo & Company announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management ("WFAM") to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. WFAM is the trade name used by the asset management businesses of Wells Fargo & Company and includes Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the adviser to the Portfolio, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, both registered investment advisers providing sub-advisory services to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Portfolio's principal underwriter. As part of the transaction, Wells Fargo & Company will own a 9.9% equity interest and will continue to serve as an important client and distribution partner.
Consummation of the transaction will result in the automatic termination of the Portfolio's advisory agreement and subadvisory agreement. The Portfolio's Board of Trustees approved a new advisory and new subadvisory agreement and approved submitting the agreements to the Portfolio’s interest holders for approval at a special meeting of interest holders expected to be held on August 16, 2021. Interest holders of record of the Portfolio at the close of business on May 28, 2021 are entitled to vote at the meeting. If interest holders approve the new agreements, they would take effect upon the closing of the transaction. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following significant accounting policies, which are consistently followed in the preparation of the financial statements of the Portfolio, are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Securities valuation
All investments are valued each business day as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4 p.m. Eastern Time), although the Portfolio may deviate from this calculation time under unusual or unexpected circumstances.
Equity securities and futures contracts that are listed on a foreign or domestic exchange or market are valued at the official closing price or, if none, the last sales price. If no sale occurs on the principal exchange or market that day, a fair value price will be determined in accordance with the Portfolio’s Valuation Procedures.
Debt securities are valued at the evaluated bid price provided by an independent pricing service (e.g. taking into account various factors, including yields, maturities, or credit ratings) or, if a reliable price is not available, the quoted bid price from an independent broker-dealer.
Investments in registered open-end investment companies are valued at net asset value. Interests in non-registered investment companies that are redeemable at net asset value are fair valued normally at net asset value.
Investments which are not valued using any of the methods discussed above are valued at their fair value, as determined in good faith by the Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees has established a Valuation Committee comprised of the Trustees and has delegated to it the authority to take any actions regarding the valuation of portfolio securities that the Valuation Committee deems necessary or appropriate, including determining the fair value of portfolio securities, unless the determination has been delegated to the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee at Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC ("Funds Management"). The Board of Trustees retains the authority to make or ratify any valuation decisions or approve any changes to the Valuation Procedures as it deems appropriate. On a quarterly basis, the Board of Trustees receives reports on any valuation actions taken by the Valuation Committee or the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee which may include items for ratification.

42  |  Wells Fargo Index Portfolio


Notes to financial statements
Securities lending
The Portfolio may lend its securities from time to time in order to earn additional income in the form of fees or interest on securities received as collateral or the investment of any cash received as collateral. When securities are on loan, the Portfolio receives interest or dividends on those securities. Cash collateral received in connection with its securities lending transactions is invested in Securities Lending Cash Investments, LLC (the “Securities Lending Fund”). Investments in Securities Lending Fund are valued at the evaluated bid price provided by an independent pricing service. Income earned from investment in the Securities Lending Fund (net of fees and rebates), if any, is included in income from affiliated securities on the Statement of Operations.
In a securities lending transaction, the net asset value of the Portfolio is affected by an increase or decrease in the value of the securities loaned and by an increase or decrease in the value of the instrument in which collateral is invested. The amount of securities lending activity undertaken by the Portfolio fluctuates from time to time. The Portfolio has the right under the lending agreement to recover the securities from the borrower on demand. In the event of default or bankruptcy by the borrower, the Portfolio may be prevented from recovering the loaned securities or gaining access to the collateral or may experience delays or costs in doing so. In such an event, the terms of the agreement allow the unaffiliated securities lending agent to use the collateral to purchase replacement securities on behalf of the Portfolio or pay the Portfolio the market value of the loaned securities. The Portfolio bears the risk of loss with respect to depreciation of its investment of the cash collateral.
Futures contracts
Futures contracts are agreements between the Portfolio and a counterparty to buy or sell a specific amount of a commodity, financial instrument or currency at a specified price on a specified date. The Portfolio may buy and sell futures contracts in order to gain exposure to, or protect against, changes in security values and is subject to equity price risk. The primary risks associated with the use of futures contracts are the imperfect correlation between changes in market values of securities held by the Portfolio and the prices of futures contracts, and the possibility of an illiquid market. Futures contracts are generally entered into on a regulated futures exchange and cleared through a clearinghouse associated with the exchange. With futures contracts, there is minimal counterparty risk to the Portfolio since futures contracts are exchange traded and the exchange’s clearinghouse, as the counterparty to all exchange traded futures, guarantees the futures contracts against default.
Upon entering into a futures contract, the Portfolio is required to deposit either cash or securities (initial margin) with the broker in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the contract value. Subsequent payments (variation margin) are paid to or from the broker each day equal to the daily changes in the contract value. Such payments are recorded as unrealized gains or losses and, if any, shown as variation margin receivable (payable) in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Should the Portfolio fail to make requested variation margin payments, the broker can gain access to the initial margin to satisfy the Portfolio’s payment obligations. When the contracts are closed, a realized gain or loss is recorded in the Statement of Operations.
Security transactions and income recognition
Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains or losses are recorded on the basis of identified cost.
Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date.
Interest income is accrued daily and bond discounts are accreted and premiums are amortized daily. To the extent debt obligations are placed on non-accrual status, any related interest income may be reduced by writing off interest receivables when the collection of all or a portion of interest has been determined to be doubtful based on consistently applied procedures and the fair value has decreased. If the issuer subsequently resumes interest payments or when the collectability of interest is reasonably assured, the debt obligation is removed from non-accrual status.
Income is recorded net of foreign taxes withheld where recovery of such taxes is not assured.
Federal and other taxes
The Portfolio is not required to pay federal income taxes on its net investment income and net capital gains as it is treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. All income, gains and losses of the Portfolio are deemed to have been “passed through” to the interest holders in proportion to their holdings of the Portfolio regardless of whether income and gains have been distributed by the Portfolio.
The Portfolio’s income tax returns and all financial records supporting those returns for the prior three fiscal years are subject to examination by the federal revenue authority. Management has analyzed the Portfolio’s tax positions taken on federal, state, and foreign tax returns for all open tax years and does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability.

Wells Fargo Index Portfolio  |  43


Notes to financial statements
As of May 31, 2021, the aggregate cost of all investments for federal income tax purposes was $332,777,937 and the unrealized gains (losses) consisted of:
Gross unrealized gains $996,362,565
Gross unrealized losses (25,101,500)
Net unrealized gains $971,261,065
3. FAIR VALUATION MEASUREMENTS
Fair value measurements of investments are determined within a framework that has established a fair value hierarchy based upon the various data inputs utilized in determining the value of the Portfolio’s investments. The three-level hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The Portfolio’s investments are classified within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The inputs are summarized into three broad levels as follows:
Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical securities
Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Portfolio’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs or methodologies used for valuing investments in securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s assets and liabilities as of May 31, 2021:
  Quoted prices
(Level 1)
Other significant
observable inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
unobservable inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Assets        
Investments in:        
Common stocks        
Communication services $ 142,963,930 $0 $0 $ 142,963,930
Consumer discretionary 155,858,713 0 0 155,858,713
Consumer staples 77,576,439 0 0 77,576,439
Energy 35,957,231 0 0 35,957,231
Financials 153,504,689 0 0 153,504,689
Health care 167,070,071 0 0 167,070,071
Industrials 115,095,517 0 0 115,095,517
Information technology 337,832,425 0 0 337,832,425
Materials 36,272,148 0 0 36,272,148
Real estate 32,832,320 0 0 32,832,320
Utilities 32,970,397 0 0 32,970,397
Short-term investments        
Investment companies 14,913,357 0 0 14,913,357
  1,302,847,237 0 0 1,302,847,237
Futures contracts 1,191,765 0 0 1,191,765
Total assets $1,304,039,002 $0 $0 $1,304,039,002
Futures contracts are reported at their cumulative unrealized gains (losses) at measurement date as reported in the table following the Portfolio of Investments. For futures contracts, the current day’s variation margin is reported on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. All other assets and liabilities are reported at their market value at measurement date.
Additional sector, industry or geographic detail, if any, is included in the Portfolio of Investments.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the Portfolio did not have any transfers into/out of Level 3.

44  |  Wells Fargo Index Portfolio


Notes to financial statements
4. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
Advisory fee
The Trust has entered into an advisory contract with Funds Management, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company ("Wells Fargo"). The adviser is responsible for implementing investment policies and guidelines and for supervising the subadviser, who is responsible for day-to-day portfolio management of the Portfolio. Pursuant to the contract, Funds Management is entitled to receive an advisory fee at the following annual rate based on the Portfolio’s average daily net assets:
Average daily net assets Advisory fee
First $500 million 0.100%
Next $500 million 0.100
Next $2 billion 0.075
Next $2 billion 0.075
Over $5 billion 0.050
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the advisory fee was equivalent to an annual rate of 0.10% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets.
Funds Management has retained the services of a subadviser to provide daily portfolio management to the Portfolio. The fee for subadvisory services is borne by Funds Management. Wells Capital Management Incorporated ("WellsCap"), an affiliate of Funds Management and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo, is the subadviser to the Portfolio and is entitled to receive a fee from Funds Management at an annual rate starting at 0.05% and declining to 0.02% as the average daily net assets of the Portfolio increase.
Interfund transactions
The Portfolio may purchase or sell portfolio investment securities to certain other Wells Fargo affiliates pursuant to Rule 17a-7 under the 1940 Act and under procedures adopted by the Board of Trustees. The procedures have been designed to ensure that these interfund transactions, which do not incur broker commissions, are effected at current market prices.
5. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS
Purchases and sales of investments, excluding U.S. government obligations (if any) and short-term securities, for the year ended May 31, 2021 were $45,288,104 and $145,234,951, respectively.
6. SECURITIES LENDING TRANSACTIONS
The Portfolio lends its securities through an unaffiliated securities lending agent and receives collateral in the form of cash or securities with a value at least equal to the value of the securities on loan. The value of the loaned securities is determined at the close of each business day and any increases or decreases in the required collateral are exchanged between the Portfolio and the counterparty on the next business day. Cash collateral received is invested in the Securities Lending Fund which seeks to provide a positive return compared to the daily Federal Funds Open Rate by investing in high-quality, U.S. dollar-denominated short-term money market instruments and is exempt from registration under Section 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act. Securities Lending Fund is managed by Funds Management and is subadvised by WellsCap. Funds Management receives an advisory fee starting at 0.05% and declining to 0.01% as the average daily net assets of the Securities Lending Fund increase. All of the fees received by Funds Management are paid to WellsCap for its services as subadviser.
In the event of counterparty default or the failure of a borrower to return a loaned security, the Portfolio has the right to use the collateral to offset any losses incurred. As of May 31, 2021, the Portfolio had securities lending transactions with the following counterparties which are subject to offset:
Counterparty Value of
securities on
loan
Collateral
received1
Net amount
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. $176,605 $(176,605) $0
1 Collateral received within this table is limited to the collateral for the net transaction with the counterparty.

Wells Fargo Index Portfolio  |  45


Notes to financial statements
7. DERIVATIVE TRANSACTIONS
During the year ended May 31, 2021, the Portfolio entered into futures contracts to gain market exposure. The Portfolio had an average notional amount of $29,142,735 in long futures contracts during the year ended May 31, 2021.
The fair value, realized gains or losses and change in unrealized gains or losses, if any, on derivative instruments are reflected in the corresponding financial statement captions.
8. BANK BORROWINGS
The Trust, along with Wells Fargo Variable Trust and Wells Fargo Funds Trust (excluding the money market funds), are parties to a $350,000,000 revolving credit agreement whereby the Portfolio is permitted to use bank borrowings for temporary or emergency purposes, such as to fund interest holders withdrawal requests. Interest under the credit agreement is charged to the Portfolio based on a borrowing rate equal to the higher of the Federal Funds rate in effect on that day plus 1.25% or the overnight LIBOR rate in effect on that day plus 1.25%. In addition, an annual commitment fee equal to 0.25% of the unused balance is allocated to each participating fund.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, there were no borrowings by the Portfolio under the agreement.
9. CONCENTRATION RISKS
As of the end of the period, the Portfolio concentrated its portfolio of investments in the information technology sector. A fund that invests a substantial portion of its assets in any sectors may be more affected by changes in that sectors than would be a fund whose investments are not heavily weighted in any sectors.
10. INDEMNIFICATION
Under the Portfolio's organizational documents, the officers and Trustees have been granted certain indemnification rights against certain liabilities that may arise out of performance of their duties to the Portfolio. The Portfolio has entered into a separate agreement with each Trustee that converts indemnification rights currently existing under the Portfolio’s organizational documents into contractual rights that cannot be changed in the future without the consent of the Trustee. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Portfolio may enter into contracts with service providers that contain a variety of indemnification clauses. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent on future claims that may be made against the Portfolio and, therefore, cannot be estimated.
11. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
In August 2018, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 updates the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Management has adopted this guidance which did not have a material impact on the financial statements.
12. CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization announced that it had made the assessment that coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) is a pandemic. The impacts of COVID-19 are affecting the entire global economy, individual companies and investment products, the funds, and the market in general. There is significant uncertainty around the extent and duration of business disruptions related to COVID-19 and the impacts may last for an extended period of time. COVID-19 has led to significant uncertainty and volatility in the financial markets.
13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
At a meeting held July 15, 2021, the Board of Trustees of the Wells Fargo Funds approved a change in the Portfolio's name to remove “Wells Fargo” from the Portfolio's name and replace with “Allspring”. The change is expected to go into effect on October 11, 2021.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) announced that it will be changing its company name to Allspring Global Investments upon the closing of the previously announced sale transaction of WFAM by Wells Fargo & Company to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. The new corporate name is expected to go into effect on the closing date of the transaction, which is anticipated to occur in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.

46  |  Wells Fargo Index Portfolio


Notes to financial statements
Following the closing of the transaction, Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the Portfolio's investment adviser, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, each sub-advisers to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC will each be rebranded as Allspring.

Wells Fargo Index Portfolio  |  47


To the Interest Holders of the Portfolio and Board of Trustees
Wells Fargo Master Trust:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Wells Fargo Index Portfolio (the Portfolio), one of the portfolios constituting Wells Fargo Master Trust, including the portfolio of investments, as of May 31, 2021, the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the financial statements) and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Portfolio as of May 31, 2021, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Portfolio in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and financial highlights, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. Such procedures also included confirmation of securities owned as of May 31, 2021, by correspondence with the custodian, transfer agent and brokers, or by other appropriate auditing procedures. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and financial highlights. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have not been able to determine the specific year that we began serving as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies; however, we are aware that we have served as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies since at least 1955.
Boston, Massachusetts
July 28, 2021

48  |  Wells Fargo Index Portfolio


Other information (unaudited)
TAX INFORMATION
For corporate shareholders, pursuant to Section 854 of the Internal Revenue Code, 95% of ordinary income dividends qualify for the corporate dividends-received deduction for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 852 of the Internal Revenue Code, $135,360,511 was designated as a 20% rate gain distribution for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 854 of the Internal Revenue Code, $16,046,898 of income dividends paid during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 has been designated as qualified dividend income (QDI).
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, $119,269 has been designated as interest-related dividends for nonresident alien shareholders pursuant to Section 871 of the Internal Revenue Code.
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, $1,373,539 has been designated as short-term capital gain dividends for nonresident alien shareholders pursuant to Section 871 of the Internal Revenue Code.
PROXY VOTING INFORMATION
A description of the policies and procedures used to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-222-8222, visiting our website at wfam.com, or visiting the SEC website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the proxies related to portfolio securities were voted during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the website at wfam.com or by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS INFORMATION
The Fund and Portfolio file their complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year as an exhibit to their reports on Form N-PORT. Shareholders and Interest holders may view the filed Form N-PORT by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov.

Wells Fargo Index Portfolio  |  49


Other information (unaudited)
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS
Each of the Trustees and Officers listed in the table below acts in identical capacities for each fund in the Wells Fargo family of funds, which consists of 139 mutual funds comprising the Wells Fargo Funds Trust, Wells Fargo Variable Trust, Wells Fargo Master Trust and four closed-end funds (collectively the “Fund Complex”). This table should be read in conjunction with the Prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information1. The mailing address of each Trustee and Officer is 525 Market Street, 12th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105. Each Trustee and Officer serves an indefinite term, however, each Trustee serves such term until reaching the mandatory retirement age established by the Trustees.
Independent Trustees
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service*
Principal occupations during past five years or longer Current other
public company or
investment
company
directorships
William R. Ebsworth
(Born 1957)
Trustee,
since 2015
Retired. From 1984 to 2013, equities analyst, portfolio manager, research director and chief investment officer at Fidelity Management and Research Company in Boston, Tokyo, and Hong Kong, and retired in 2013 as Chief Investment Officer of Fidelity Strategic Advisers, Inc. where he led a team of investment professionals managing client assets. Prior thereto, Board member of Hong Kong Securities Clearing Co., Hong Kong Options Clearing Corp., the Thailand International Fund, Ltd., Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company, and Empire Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company. Audit Committee Chair and Investment Committee Chair of the Vincent Memorial Hospital Endowment (non-profit organization). Mr. Ebsworth is a CFA® charterholder. N/A
Jane A. Freeman
(Born 1953)
Trustee,
since 2015;
Chair Liaison,
since 2018
Retired. From 2012 to 2014 and 1999 to 2008, Chief Financial Officer of Scientific Learning Corporation. From 2008 to 2012, Ms. Freeman provided consulting services related to strategic business projects. Prior to 1999, Portfolio Manager at Rockefeller & Co. and Scudder, Stevens & Clark. Board member of the Harding Loevner Funds from 1996 to 2014, serving as both Lead Independent Director and chair of the Audit Committee. Board member of the Russell Exchange Traded Funds Trust from 2011 to 2012 and the chair of the Audit Committee. Ms. Freeman is also an inactive Chartered Financial Analyst. N/A
Isaiah Harris, Jr.
(Born 1952)
Trustee,
since 2009; Audit
Committee
Chair,
since 2019
Retired. Chairman of the Board of CIGNA Corporation since 2009, and Director since 2005. From 2003 to 2011, Director of Deluxe Corporation. Prior thereto, President and CEO of BellSouth Advertising and Publishing Corp. from 2005 to 2007, President and CEO of BellSouth Enterprises from 2004 to 2005 and President of BellSouth Consumer Services from 2000 to 2003. Emeritus member of the Iowa State University Foundation Board of Governors. Emeritus Member of the Advisory Board of Iowa State University School of Business. Advisory Board Member, Palm Harbor Academy (private school). Mr. Harris is a certified public accountant (inactive status). CIGNA Corporation
Judith M. Johnson
(Born 1949)
Trustee,
since 2008
Retired. Prior thereto, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund from 1996 to 2008. Ms. Johnson is an attorney, certified public accountant and a certified managerial accountant. N/A
David F. Larcker
(Born 1950)
Trustee,
since 2009
James Irvin Miller Professor of Accounting at the Graduate School of Business (Emeritus), Stanford University, Director of the Corporate Governance Research Initiative and Senior Faculty of The Rock Center for Corporate Governance since 2006. From 2005 to 2008, Professor of Accounting at the Graduate School of Business, Stanford University. Prior thereto, Ernst & Young Professor of Accounting at The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania from 1985 to 2005. N/A

50  |  Wells Fargo Index Portfolio


Other information (unaudited)
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service*
Principal occupations during past five years or longer Current other
public company or
investment
company
directorships
Olivia S. Mitchell
(Born 1953)
Trustee,
since 2006;
Nominating and
Governance
Committee Chair,
since 2018
International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans Professor, Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania since 1993. Director of Wharton’s Pension Research Council and Boettner Center on Pensions & Retirement Research, and Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. Previously, Cornell University Professor from 1978 to 1993. N/A
Timothy J. Penny
(Born 1951)
Trustee,
since 1996;
Chair,
since 2018
President and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Minnesota Initiative Foundation, a non-profit organization, since 2007. Member of the Board of Trustees of NorthStar Education Finance, Inc., a non-profit organization, since 2007. N/A
James G. Polisson
(Born 1959)
Trustee,
since 2018
Retired. Chief Marketing Officer, Source (ETF) UK Services, Ltd, from 2015 to 2017. From 2012 to 2015, Principal of The Polisson Group, LLC, a management consulting, corporate advisory and principal investing company. Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director at Russell Investments, Global Exchange Traded Funds from 2010 to 2012. Managing Director of Barclays Global Investors from 1998 to 2010 and Global Chief Marketing Officer for iShares and Barclays Global Investors from 2000 to 2010. Trustee of the San Francisco Mechanics’ Institute, a non-profit organization, from 2013 to 2015. Board member of the Russell Exchange Traded Fund Trust from 2011 to 2012. Director of Barclays Global Investors Holdings Deutschland GmbH from 2006 to 2009. Mr. Polisson is an attorney and has a retired status with the Massachusetts and District of Columbia Bar Associations. N/A
Pamela Wheelock
(Born 1959)
Trustee,
since January
2020; previously
Trustee from
January 2018 to
July 2019
Board member of the Destination Medical Center Economic Development Agency, Rochester, Minnesota since 2019. Interim President of the McKnight Foundation from January to September 2020. Acting Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Human Services, July 2019 through September 2019. Human Services Manager (part-time), Minnesota Department of Human Services, October 2019 through December 2019. Chief Operating Officer, Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity from 2017 to 2019. Vice President of University Services, University of Minnesota from 2012 to 2016. Prior thereto, on the Board of Directors, Governance Committee and Finance Committee for the Minnesota Philanthropy Partners (Saint Paul Foundation) from 2012 to 2018, Interim Chief Executive Officer of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota from 2011 to 2012, Chairman of the Board from 2009 to 2012 and Board Director from 2003 to 2015. Vice President, Leadership and Community Engagement, Bush Foundation, Saint Paul, Minnesota (a private foundation) from 2009 to 2011. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Minnesota Sports and Entertainment from 2004 to 2009 and Senior Vice President from 2002 to 2004. Executive Vice President of the Minnesota Wild Foundation from 2004 to 2008. Commissioner of Finance, State of Minnesota, from 1999 to 2002. Currently Board Chair of the Minnesota Wild Foundation since 2010. N/A
*  Length of service dates reflect the Trustee’s commencement of service with the Trust’s predecessor entities, where applicable.

Wells Fargo Index Portfolio  |  51


Other information (unaudited)
Officers
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service
Principal occupations during past five years or longer
Andrew Owen
(Born 1960)
President,
since 2017
Executive Vice President of Wells Fargo & Company and Head of Affiliated Managers, Wells Fargo Asset Management, since 2014. In addition, Mr. Owen is currently President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC since 2017. Prior thereto, Executive Vice President responsible for marketing, investments and product development for Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, from 2009 to 2014.
Jeremy DePalma
(Born 1974)
Treasurer,
since 2012
(for certain funds in
the Fund Complex);
since 2021 (for
the remaining funds in the
Fund Complex)
Senior Vice President of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC since 2009. Senior Vice President of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC from 2008 to 2010 and head of the Fund Reporting and Control Team within Fund Administration from 2005 to 2010.
Michelle Rhee
(Born 1966)
Chief Legal Officer,
since 2019
Secretary of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC and Chief Legal Counsel of Wells Fargo Asset Management since 2018. Deputy General Counsel of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. since 2020 and Assistant General Counsel of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. from 2018 to 2020. Associate General Counsel and Managing Director of Bank of America Corporation from 2004 to 2018.
Catherine Kennedy
(Born 1969)
Secretary,
since 2019
Vice President of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC and Senior Counsel of the Wells Fargo Legal Department since 2010. Vice President and Senior Counsel of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC from 1998 to 2010.
Michael H. Whitaker
(Born 1967)
Chief Compliance Officer,
since 2016
Chief Compliance Officer of Wells Fargo Asset Management since 2016. Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer for Fidelity Investments from 2007 to 2016.
1  The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about the Trustees and is available, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-222-8222 or by visiting the website at wfam.com.

52  |  Wells Fargo Index Portfolio


Other information (unaudited)
LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
In accordance with Rule 22e-4 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Liquidity Rule”), Wells Fargo Funds Trust and Wells Fargo Master Trust (each a “Trust”) has adopted and implemented a liquidity risk management program (the “Program”) on behalf of each of its series, including the Fund and the Portfolio, which is reasonably designed to assess and manage the Fund’s or the Portfolio’s liquidity risk. “Liquidity risk” is defined under the Liquidity Rule as the risk that the Fund or Portfolio is unable to meet redemption requests without significantly diluting remaining investors’ interests in the Fund or Portfolio. Each Trust’s Board of Trustees (each a “Board”) previously approved the designation of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”), the Fund’s investment manager and the Portfolio’s investment adviser, as the administrator of the Program, and Funds Management has established a Liquidity Risk Management Council (the “Council”) composed of personnel from multiple departments within Funds Management and its affiliates to assist Funds Management in the implementation and on-going administration of the Program.
The Program is comprised of various components designed to support the assessment and/or management of liquidity risk, including: (1) the periodic assessment (no less frequently than annually) of certain factors that influence the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s liquidity risk; (2) the periodic classification (no less frequently than monthly) of the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s investments into one of four liquidity categories that reflect an estimate of their liquidity under current market conditions; (3) a 15% limit on the acquisition of “illiquid investments” (as defined under the Liquidity Rule); (4) to the extent the Fund or the Portfolio does not invest primarily in “highly liquid investments” (as defined under the Liquidity Rule), the determination of a minimum percentage of the Fund’s or the Portfolio’s assets that generally will be invested in highly liquid investments (an “HLIM”); (5) if the Fund or the Portfolio has established an HLIM, the periodic review (no less frequently than annually) of the HLIM and the adoption of policies and procedures for responding to a shortfall of the Fund’s or the Portfolio’s “highly liquid investments” below its HLIM; and (6) periodic reporting to the Board.
At a meeting of the Board held on May 17-19, 2021, the Board received and reviewed a written report (the “Report”) from Funds Management that addressed the operation of the Program and assessed its adequacy and effectiveness for the period from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 (the “Reporting Period”). Among other things, the Report discussed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on liquidity and management of liquidity risk during the Reporting Period, including during the stressed market conditions caused by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. No significant liquidity events impacting the Fund or the Portfolio were noted in the Report. As applicable to the Fund and the Portfolio, there were no material changes to the Program during the Reporting Period.
Funds Management concluded in the Report that the Program is operating effectively to assess and manage the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s liquidity risk, and that the Program has been and continues to be adequately and effectively implemented to monitor and, as applicable, respond to the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s liquidity developments.
There can be no assurance that the Program will achieve its objectives under all circumstances in the future. Please refer to the Fund’s prospectus for more information regarding the Fund’s exposure to liquidity risk and other risks to which an investment in the Fund may be subject.

Wells Fargo Index Portfolio  |  53


Board considerations (unaudited)
BOARD CONSIDERATION OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, ADVISORY AND SUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENTS:
Board Considerations – Current Agreements
Under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Board of Trustees (each, a “Board” and collectively, the “Boards”) of each of Wells Fargo Funds Trust (“Funds Trust”) and Wells Fargo Master Trust (“Master Trust”, and collectively, the “Trusts”) must determine annually whether to approve the continuation of the Trusts’ investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements, as applicable. In this regard, at a Board meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Meeting”), the Funds Trust Board, all the members of which have no direct or indirect interest in the investment management agreement and are not “interested persons” of the Trusts, as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), reviewed and approved for Wells Fargo Index Fund (the “Gateway Fund”) an investment management agreement (the “Gateway Fund Management Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”).
At the Meeting, the Master Trust Board, all the members of which have no direct or indirect interest in the investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements and are Independent Trustees, reviewed and approved: (i) an investment advisory agreement (the “Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement”) with Funds Management for Wells Fargo Index Portfolio, a portfolio of Master Trust (the “Master Portfolio”); and (ii) an investment sub-advisory agreement (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Wells Capital Management Incorporated (the “Sub-Adviser”), an affiliate of Funds Management, for the Master Portfolio.
The Gateway Fund and the Master Portfolio are collectively referred to as the “Funds.” The Gateway Fund Management Agreement, the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement are collectively referred to as the “Advisory Agreements.”
The Gateway Fund is a gateway feeder fund that invest substantially all of its assets in the Master Portfolio. The Master Portfolio has a substantially similar investment objective and substantially similar investment strategies to the Gateway Fund. Information provided to the Boards regarding the Gateway Fund is also applicable to the Master Portfolio, as relevant.
The Boards noted that Wells Fargo & Company recently announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”), which includes Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser, to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. and/or their affiliates (the “Transaction”). The Boards further noted that the Transaction would result in a change-of-control of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser, which would be considered to be an assignment that would result in the termination of the Advisory Agreements. In light of the Transaction, each Board separately considered for approval a new investment management agreement with Funds Management and, with respect to the Master Portfolio, the Master Trust Board considered for approval a new sub-advisory agreement with the Sub-Adviser (collectively, the “New Agreements”) that would replace the Advisory Agreements upon consummation of the Transaction, subject to approval of each respective New Agreement by each Fund’s shareholders. The Boards also considered for approval interim agreements to go into effect in the event shareholders do not approve the New Agreements before the Transaction is completed. The interim agreements would allow the Manager and the Sub-Adviser, as applicable, to continue providing services to the Funds while the Funds continue to seek shareholder approval of the New Agreements. The Boards noted that the terms of the interim agreements would be identical to those of the current Advisory Agreements, except for the term and certain escrow provisions.
At the Meeting, the Boards considered the factors and reached the conclusions described below relating to the selection of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser and the approval of the Advisory Agreements. Prior to the Meeting, including at Board meetings held in April and May 2021, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with representatives of Funds Management about these matters. Also, the Boards have adopted a team-based approach, with each team consisting of a sub-set of Trustees, to assist the full Boards in the discharge of their duties in reviewing investment performance and other matters throughout the year. The Independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Advisory Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately.
In providing information to the Boards, Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser were guided by a detailed set of requests for information submitted to them by independent legal counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees at the start of the Boards’ annual contract renewal process earlier in 2021. In considering and approving the Advisory Agreements, the Trustees considered the information they believed relevant, including but not limited to the information discussed below. The Boards considered not only the specific information presented in connection with the Meeting, but also the knowledge gained over time through interaction with Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser about various topics. In this regard, the Boards reviewed reports of Funds Management at each of their quarterly meetings, which included, among other things, portfolio reviews and investment performance reports. In addition, the Boards and the teams mentioned above confer with portfolio managers at various times throughout the year. The Boards did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each individual Trustee may have attributed different weights to various factors.

54  |  Wells Fargo Index Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
After its deliberations, the Funds Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Gateway Fund Management Agreement for a one-year term. Additionally, after its deliberations, the Master Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement, each for a one-year term. The Boards considered the approval of the Advisory Agreements for the Funds as part of their consideration of agreements for funds across the complex, but their approvals were made on a fund-by-fund basis. The following summarizes a number of important, but not necessarily all, factors considered by the Boards in support of their approvals.
Nature, extent and quality of services
The Boards received and considered various information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser under the Advisory Agreements. This information included a description of the investment advisory services and Fund-level administrative services, as well as, among other things, a summary of the background and experience of senior management of WFAM, of which Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser are a part, and a summary of investments made in the business of WFAM. The Boards also received a description of Funds Management’s and the Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans, including a summary of the performance of such plans and any changes thereto during the COVID-19 pandemic, and of their approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity. The Boards also received and reviewed information about Funds Management’s role as administrator of the Funds’ liquidity risk management program, Funds Management’s approach to risk management, and Funds Management’s intermediary and vendor oversight program.
The Boards also considered the qualifications, background, tenure and responsibilities of each of the portfolio managers primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the Funds. The Boards evaluated the ability of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser to attract and retain qualified investment professionals, including research, advisory and supervisory personnel.
The Boards further considered the compliance programs and compliance records of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser. In addition, the Boards took into account the full range of services provided to the Funds by Funds Management and its affiliates. The Boards also considered information about retention and back-up arrangements that have been put into place with respect to key personnel of WFAM in connection with the anticipated Transaction, noting that WFAM provided assurances that the announcement and eventual culmination of the Transaction is not expected to result in any diminution in the nature or quality of services provided to the Funds.
Fund investment performance and expenses
The Boards considered the investment performance results for each of the Funds over various time periods ended December 31, 2020. The Boards considered these results in comparison to the investment performance of funds in a universe that was determined by Broadridge Inc. (“Broadridge”) to be similar to the Gateway Fund (the “Universe”), and in comparison to the Gateway Fund’s benchmark index and to other comparative data. Broadridge is an independent provider of investment company data. The Boards received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the performance Universe. The Funds Trust Board noted that the investment performance of the Gateway Fund (Administrator Class) was higher than or in range of the average investment performance of its Universe for the one-, three-, five- and ten-year periods ended December 31, 2020. The Funds Trust Board also noted that the investment performance of the Gateway Fund was in range of its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index, for the three-, five- and ten-year periods ended December 31, 2020, and lower than its benchmark for the one-year period ended December 31, 2020.
The Master Trust Board took note of the investment performance of the Master Portfolio in the context of reviewing the investment performance of the Gateway Fund.
The Funds Trust Board also received and considered information regarding the Gateway Fund’s net operating expense ratios, which include fees and expenses of the Master Portfolio, and their various components, including actual management fees assessed at the Gateway Fund and Master Portfolio levels, custodian and other non-management fees, and Rule 12b-1 and non-Rule 12b-1 shareholder service fees. The Funds Trust Board considered these ratios in comparison to the median ratios of funds in class-specific expense groups that were determined by Broadridge to be similar to the Gateway Fund (the “Groups”). The Funds Trust Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the expense Groups and an explanation of how funds comprising expense groups and their expense ratios may vary from year-to-year. Based on the Broadridge reports, the Funds Trust Board noted that the net operating expense ratios of the Gateway Fund were lower than the median net operating expense ratios of its expense Groups for each share class.
With respect to the Master Portfolio, the Master Trust Board reviewed the fee rates that are payable to Funds Management for investment advisory services (as discussed below), which are the only fees charged at the Master Portfolio level, relative to a corresponding expense Group.

Wells Fargo Index Fund  |  55


Board considerations (unaudited)
The Boards took into account the Funds’ investment performance and expense information provided to them among the factors considered in deciding to re-approve the Advisory Agreements.
Investment management, advisory and sub-advisory fee rates
The Funds Trust Board noted that Funds Management receives no advisory fees from the Gateway Fund as long as the Gateway Fund continues to invest all (or substantially all) of its assets in a single master portfolio. If the Gateway Fund were to change its investment structure so that it began investing in two or more master portfolios (a fund-of-funds), Funds Management would be entitled to receive an annual fee of 0.25% of the Gateway Fund’s average daily net assets for providing investment advisory services to the Gateway Fund, including allocating the Gateway Fund’s assets to the Master Portfolio.
The Funds Trust Board reviewed and considered the contractual fee rates that are payable by the Gateway Fund to Funds Management under the Gateway Fund Management Agreement for management services (other than investment advisory services), as well as the contractual fee rates payable by the Gateway Fund to Funds Management for class-level administrative services under a Class-Level Administration Agreement, which include, among other things, class-level transfer agency and sub-transfer agency costs (collectively, the “Management Rates”).
The Master Trust Board reviewed and considered the contractual investment advisory fee rate that is payable by the Master Portfolio to Funds Management for investment advisory services under the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement (the “Advisory Agreement Rate”). The Master Trust Board also reviewed and considered the contractual investment sub-advisory fee rate that is payable by Funds Management to the Sub-Adviser for investment sub-advisory services (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement Rate”).
Among other information reviewed by the Funds Trust Board was a comparison of the Gateway Fund’s Management Rate, which, for this purpose, includes the advisory fees paid at the Master Portfolio level, with the average contractual investment management fee rates of funds in the expense Groups at a common asset level as well as transfer agency costs of the funds in the expense Groups. The Funds Trust Board noted that the Management Rates of the Gateway Fund were in range of the sum of the average rates for the Gateway Fund’s expense Group for Administrator Class, and higher than the sum of the average rates for the Gateway Fund’s expense Group for Class A.
The Master Trust Board reviewed a comparison of the Advisory Agreement Rate of the Master Portfolio with those of other funds in the Master Portfolio’s expense Group at a common asset level. The Master Trust Board noted that the Advisory Agreement Rate of the Master Portfolio was equal to the median rate for the Master Portfolio’s expense Group.
The Master Trust Board also received and considered information about the portions of the total management fees that were retained by Funds Management after payment of the fees to the Sub-Adviser for sub-advisory services. In assessing the reasonableness of these amounts, the Master Trust Board received and evaluated information about the nature and extent of responsibilities retained and risks assumed by Funds Management and not delegated to or assumed by the Sub-Adviser, and about Funds Management’s on-going oversight services. Given the affiliation between Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser, the Master Trust Board ascribed limited relevance to the allocation of fees between them.
The Boards also received and considered information about the nature and extent of services offered and fee rates charged by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser to other types of clients with investment strategies similar to those of the Funds. In this regard, the Boards received information about the significantly greater scope of services, and compliance, reporting and other legal burdens and risks of managing proprietary mutual funds compared with those associated with managing assets of other types of clients, including third-party sub-advised fund clients and non-mutual fund clients such as institutional separate accounts.
Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Funds Trust Board determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the Gateway Fund Management Agreement was reasonable, and the Master Trust Board determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and to the Sub-Adviser under the Sub-Advisory Agreement was reasonable.
Profitability
The Boards received and considered information concerning the profitability of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo & Co. (“Wells Fargo”) from providing services to the fund family as a whole. The Boards noted that the Sub-Adviser’s profitability information with respect to providing services to the Master Portfolio and other funds in the family was subsumed in the WFAM and Wells Fargo profitability analysis.
Funds Management reported on the methodologies and estimates used in calculating profitability, including a description of the methodology used to allocate certain expenses. Among other things, the Boards noted that the levels of profitability reported on a fund-by-fund basis varied widely, depending on factors such as the size, type and age of fund. Based on its review, the Boards did

56  |  Wells Fargo Index Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
not deem the profits reported by Funds Management, WFAM or Wells Fargo from services provided to the Funds to be at a level that would prevent the Boards from approving the continuation of the Advisory Agreements.
Economies of scale
The Boards received and considered information about the potential for Funds Management to experience economies of scale in the provision of management services to the Funds, the difficulties of calculating economies of scale at an individual fund level, and the extent to which potential scale benefits are shared with shareholders of the Funds. The Boards noted the existence of breakpoints in the Master Portfolio’s advisory fee structure and the Gateway Fund’s management fee structure, which operate generally to reduce the Funds’ expense ratios as the Funds grow in size, and the size of the Master Portfolio and the Gateway Fund, respectively, in relation to such breakpoints. The Boards considered that, in addition to advisory fee and management fee breakpoints, Funds Management shares potential economies of scale from its management business in a variety of ways, including through fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangements, competitive management fee rates set at the outset without regard to breakpoints, and investments in the business intended to enhance services available to shareholders.
The Boards concluded that Funds Management’s arrangements with respect to each Fund, including contractual breakpoints, constituted a reasonable approach to sharing potential economies of scale with the Funds and their shareholders.
Other benefits to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser
The Boards received and considered information regarding potential “fall-out” or ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including the Sub-Adviser, as a result of their relationships with the Funds. Ancillary benefits could include, among others, benefits directly attributable to other relationships with the Funds and benefits potentially derived from an increase in Funds Management’s and the Sub-Adviser’s business as a result of their relationships with the Funds. The Boards noted that various affiliates of Funds Management may receive distribution-related fees, shareholder servicing payments and sub-transfer agency fees in respect of shares sold or held through them and services provided.
The Boards also reviewed information about soft dollar credits earned and utilized by the Sub-Adviser, fees earned by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser from managing a private investment vehicle for the fund family’s securities lending collateral, and commissions earned by an affiliated broker from portfolio transactions.
Based on their consideration of the factors and information they deemed relevant, including those described here, the Boards did not find that any ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including the Sub-Adviser, were unreasonable.
Conclusion
At the Meeting, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Funds Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Gateway Fund Management Agreement for a one-year term. Additionally, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Master Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement, each for a one-year term.

Wells Fargo Index Fund  |  57


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board Considerations - New Agreements
Overview of the Board evaluation process
At a meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Board Meeting”), the Board of Trustees of Wells Fargo Funds Trust (“Funds Trust”, and the series identified below, the “Funds”) approved the continuation of each Fund’s current Investment Management Agreement (the “Current Investment Management Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”) and the Board of Trustees of Wells Fargo Master Trust (“Master Trust”, and the series identified below in which each Fund invests substantially all of its assets, a “Master Portfolio”) approved the continuation of the current investment advisory agreement (the “Current Advisory Agreement”) with Funds Management, the current sub-advisory agreement with Wells Capital Management Incorporated (“Wells Capital”, and together with Funds Management, the “Advisers”), and the current sub-advisory agreements with Cooke & Bieler, L.P. (“C&B”) and Peregrine Capital Management, LLC (“Peregrine”, and together with C&B, the “Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers”)(collectively, the “Current Agreements”).
Funds Trust Master Trust
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio
Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio
Wells Fargo Index Fund Wells Fargo Index Portfolio
Wells Fargo Real Return Fund Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio
Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio
Each Trustee on the Funds Trust Board and the Master Trust Board of Trustees (collectively, the “Boards”) is not an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) of the Funds or the Master Portfolios (collectively, the “Independent Trustees”). The process followed by the Boards in considering and approving the continuation of each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s Current Agreements is referred to herein as the “2021 Annual Approval Process.”
As noted above, the closing of the sale of Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”) to a holding company (“NewCo”) affiliated with private funds of GTCR LLC (“GTCR”) and of Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. (“Reverence Capital”, and such transaction, the “Transaction”) will result in a change of control of Funds Management and Wells Capital, which will be considered to be an “assignment” of each Fund’s Current Agreements under the 1940 Act that will result in the automatic termination of each Fund’s Current Agreements. In light of the expected termination of each Fund’s Current Agreements upon the closing, at the Board Meeting the Boards also approved, as applicable: (i) for Funds Trust, a new investment management agreement with Funds Management (the “New Investment Management Agreement”); (ii) for the Master Trust, a new advisory agreement with Funds Management (the “New Advisory Agreement”); (iii) for Master Trust, a new sub-advisory agreement (the “New WellsCap Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Wells Capital for Emerging Growth Portfolio, Index Portfolio, Small Company Value Portfolio, Core Bond Portfolio and Real Return Portfolio; (iv) for Master Trust, a new sub-advisory agreement (the “New Peregrine Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Peregrine for Small Company Growth Portfolio; and (v) for Master Trust, a new sub-advisory agreement (the “New C&B Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with C&B for the C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio, each of which is intended to go into effect upon the closing (the “New Agreements”). The process followed by the Boards in reviewing and approving the New Agreements is referred to herein as the “New Agreement Approval Process.”
At a series of meetings held in April and May 2021 (collectively, “April and May 2021 Meetings”) and at the Board Meeting, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital about the New Agreements and related matters. The Boards reviewed and discussed information furnished by Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital that the Boards considered reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the New Agreements and the services to be provided. At these meetings, senior representatives from Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital made presentations to, and responded to questions from, the Boards.
In providing information to the Boards in connection with the 2021 annual approval process for the Current Agreements (the “2021 Annual Approval Process”) and the New Agreement Approval Process, Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital (as applicable) were guided by requests for information submitted by independent legal counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. In considering and approving the New Agreements, the Trustees considered the information they believed relevant, including but not limited to the information discussed herein. The Boards considered not only the specific information presented in connection with the April and May 2021 Meetings as well as the Board Meeting, but also the knowledge gained over time through interaction with Funds Management, as well as with Wells Capital and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers (collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”), about various topics. In this regard, the Boards review reports of Funds Management at each of their regular

58  |  Wells Fargo Index Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board meetings, which includes, among other things, portfolio reviews and investment performance reports. In addition, the Boards confer with portfolio managers at various times throughout the year. The Boards were assisted in their evaluation of the New Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom the Independent Trustees received separate legal advice and with whom the Independent Trustees met separately. The Boards did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each individual Trustee may have attributed different weights to various factors.
Among other information considered by the Boards in connection with the Transaction was:
■  Information regarding the Transaction: information about the structure, financing sources and material terms and conditions of the Transaction, including the expected impact on the businesses conducted by the Advisers and by Wells Fargo Funds Distributor LLC, as the distributor of Fund shares.
■  Information regarding NewCo, GTCR and Reverence Capital: (i) information about NewCo, including information about its expected financial condition and access to capital, and senior leadership team; (ii) the experience of senior management at GTCR and Reverence Capital in acquiring portfolio companies; (iii) the plan to operationalize NewCo, including the transition of necessary infrastructure services through a transition services agreement with Wells Fargo under which Wells Fargo will continue to provide NewCo with certain services for a specified period of time after the closing; and (iv) information regarding regulatory matters, compliance, and risk management functions at NewCo, including resources to be dedicated thereto.
■  Impact of the Transaction on WFAM and Service Providers: (i) information regarding any changes to personnel and/or other resources of the Advisers as a result of the Transaction, including assurances regarding comparable and competitive compensation arrangements to attract and retain highly qualified personnel; and (ii) information about the organizational and operating structure with respect to NewCo, the Advisers and the Funds and Master Portfolios.
■  Impact of the Transaction on the Funds and their Shareholders and the Master Portfolios and their Interest Holders: (i) information regarding anticipated benefits to the Funds and the Master Portfolios as a result of the Transaction; (ii) a commitment that the Funds and Master Portfolios would not bear any expenses, directly or indirectly, in connection with the Transaction; (iii) confirmation that the Advisers and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers intend to continue to manage the Funds in a manner consistent with each Fund’s or Master Portfolio’s current investment objectives and principal investments strategies, as applicable; and (iv) a commitment that neither NewCo nor WFAM will take any steps that would impose any “unfair burden” (as that term is used in section 15(f)(1)(B) of the 1940 Act) on the Funds or the Master Portfolios as a result of the Transaction.
With respect to the New Agreements, the Boards considered: (i) a representation that, after the closing, all of the Funds and Master Portfolios will continue to be managed and advised by their current Advisers and Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, as applicable, and that the same portfolio managers are expected to continue to manage the Funds or Master Portfolios, as applicable, after the Transaction; (ii) information regarding the terms of the New Agreements, including changes as compared to the Current Agreements; (iii) information confirming that the fee rates payable under the New Agreements will not increase as a result of the Transaction as compared to the rates under the Current Agreements; and (iv) assurances that the Transaction is not expected to cause any diminution with respect to the nature, extent and quality of any of the services currently provided to the Funds or the Master Portfolios by the Advisers and Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers as a result of the Transaction.
In addition to considering information furnished specifically to evaluate the impact of the Transaction on the Funds and their respective shareholders and the Master Portfolios and their interest holders in connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards considered information furnished at prior meetings of the Boards and their committees, including detailed information provided in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process. In this regard, in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received information about complex-wide and individual Fund and Master Portfolio performance, fees and expenses, including: (i) a report from an independent data provider comparing the investment performance of each Fund or Master Portfolio to the investment performance of comparable funds and benchmark indices, over various time periods; (ii) a report from an independent data provider comparing each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s total expense ratio (and its components) to those of comparable funds; (iii) comparative information concerning the fees charged and services provided by the Advisers and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, to each Fund or Master Portfolio in managing other accounts (which may include other mutual funds, collective investment funds and institutional accounts), if any, that employ investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing such Fund(s) or Master Portfolio(s) as applicable; and (iv) profitability analyses of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo from providing services to the fund family as a whole.
After its deliberations, the Boards unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the respective New Agreements is reasonable, approved the respective New Agreements for a two-year term, and

Wells Fargo Index Fund  |  59


Board considerations (unaudited)
voted to recommend that Fund shareholders approve the New Agreements. The Boards considered the approval of the New Agreements as part of their consideration of agreements for funds and master portfolios across the complex, but their approvals were made on a fund-by-fund basis. The following summarizes a number of important, but not necessarily all, factors considered by the Boards in support of their approvals.
Nature, extent and quality of services
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered various information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds and Master Portfolios by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the Current Agreements. This information included a description of the investment advisory services and Fund-level administrative services covered by the Current Agreements, as well as, among other things, a summary of the background and experience of senior management of WFAM, of which Funds Management and Wells Capital are a part, and a summary of investments made in the business of WFAM. The Boards also received a description of Funds Management’s and Wells Capital’s business continuity plans, including a summary of the performance of such plans and any changes thereto during the COVID-19 pandemic, and of their approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity. The Boards also received and reviewed information about Funds Management’s role as administrator of the Funds’ and Master Portfolios’ liquidity risk management program, Funds Management’s approach to risk management, and Funds Management’s intermediary and vendor oversight program.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also considered the qualifications, background, tenure and responsibilities of each of the portfolio managers primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the Funds and the Master Portfolios. The Boards evaluated the ability of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to attract and retain qualified investment professionals, including research, advisory and supervisory personnel.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards further considered the compliance programs and compliance records of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers. In addition, the Boards took into account the full range of services provided to the Funds by Funds Management and its affiliates.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards considered, among other information, the structure of the Transaction and expected impact, if any, of the Transaction on the operations, facilities, organization and personnel of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers. The Boards received assurances from Funds Management that each Fund and Master Portfolio will continue to be advised by its current Sub-Advisers after the closing, and that the same individual portfolio managers are expected to continue to manage the Funds and Master Portfolios, respectively, after the closing. With respect to the recruitment and retention of key personnel, the Boards noted information from GTCR, Reverence Capital and the Advisers regarding the potential benefits for employees of joining NewCo. The Boards recognized that the personnel of the Advisers who had been extended offers may not accept such offers, and personnel changes at the Advisers or the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers may occur in the future in the ordinary course.
In addition, the Boards considered information regarding the infrastructure, operational capabilities and support staff in place to assist in the portfolio management and operations of the Funds and Master Portfolios, as applicable, including the provision of administrative services, and the anticipated impact of the Transaction on such matters. The Boards also considered the business-related and other risks to which the Advisers and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers may be subject in managing the Funds and Master Portfolios, as applicable, and in connection with the Transaction. The Boards also considered the transition and integration plans as a result of the change in ownership of the Advisers from Wells Fargo to NewCo. The Boards considered the resources and infrastructure that NewCo intends to devote to its compliance program to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations, as well as its risk management program and cybersecurity program. The Boards also took into account assurances received from the Advisers, GTCR and Reverence Capital that the Transaction is not expected to cause any diminution in the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Advisers or the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers to the Funds and their shareholders or to the Master Portfolios and their interest holders, as applicable.
Fund investment performance and expenses
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards considered the investment performance results for each Fund over various time periods ended December 31, 2020. The Boards considered these results in comparison to the investment performance of funds in a universe that was determined by Broadridge Inc. (“Broadridge”) to be similar to each Fund (the “Universe”), and in comparison to each Fund’s benchmark index and to other comparative data. Broadridge is an independent provider of investment company data. The Boards received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the performance Universe. Where applicable, the Boards received information concerning, and discussed factors contributing to, underperformance of Funds relative to the Universe and benchmark for any underperformance periods.
The Master Trust Board of Trustees took note of the investment performance of the Master Portfolios in the context of reviewing the investment performance of the Funds.

60  |  Wells Fargo Index Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also received and considered information regarding each Fund’s and Portfolio’s net operating expense ratios and their various components, including actual management fees, custodian and other non-management fees, and Rule 12b-1 and non-Rule 12b-1 shareholder service fees. The Boards considered these ratios in comparison to the median ratios of funds in class-specific expense groups that were determined by Broadridge to be similar to each Fund (the “Groups”). The Boards received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the expense Groups and an explanation of how funds comprising expense groups and their expense ratios may vary from year-to-year.
With respect to the Master Portfolios, the Master Trust Board of Trustees reviewed the fee rates that are payable to Funds Management for investment advisory services, which are the only fees charged at the Master Portfolio level, relative to a corresponding expense Group.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards received a commitment that WFAM will maintain fee and expense commitments for at least two years after the closing. The Boards took into account each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s investment performance and expense information among the factors considered in deciding to approve the New Agreements.
Investment management, advisory and sub-advisory fee rates
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board of Trustees of the Trust noted that Funds Management receives no advisory fees from a Fund as long as the Fund continues to invest all (or substantially all) of its assets in a single master portfolio. If a Fund were to change its investment structure so that it began investing in two or more master portfolios (a fund-of-funds), Funds Management would be entitled to receive an annual fee of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets for providing investment advisory services to the Fund, including allocating the Fund’s assets among the Master Portfolios.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board of Trustees of the Trust reviewed and considered the contractual fee rates that are payable by each Fund to Funds Management under the Fund’s Management Agreement for management services (other than investment advisory services), as well as the contractual fee rates payable by the Fund to Funds Management for class-level administrative services under a Class-Level Administration Agreement, which include, among other things, class-level transfer agency and subtransfer agency costs (collectively, the “Management Rates”). The Master Trust Board of Trustees reviewed and considered the contractual investment advisory fee rate that is payable by each Master Portfolio to Funds Management for investment advisory services under the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement (the “Advisory Agreement Rate”). The Master Trust Board of Trustees also reviewed and considered the contractual investment sub-advisory fee rates that are payable by Funds Management to the Sub-Advisers for investment sub-advisory services (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement Rates”).
Among other information reviewed by the Boards in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, was a comparison of each Fund’s Management Rates which, for this purpose, includes the advisory fees paid at the Master Portfolio level, with the average contractual investment management fee rates of funds in the expense Groups at a common asset level as well as transfer agency costs of the funds in the expense Groups.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also received and considered information about the nature and extent of services offered and fee rates charged by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to other types of clients, if any, with investment strategies similar to those of each Fund. In this regard, the Boards received information about the significantly greater scope of services, and compliance, reporting and other legal burdens and risks of managing proprietary mutual funds compared with those associated with managing assets of other types of clients, including third-party sub-advised fund clients and non-mutual fund clients such as institutional separate accounts.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards noted the assurances received by it that there would be no increases to any of the Management Rates, the Advisory Agreement Rates or the Sub-Advisory Agreement Rates as a result of the Transaction. The Boards also considered that the New Agreements do not change the computation method for calculating such fees, and there is no present intention to reduce expense waiver and reimbursement arrangements that are currently in effect. Based on their consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Boards determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the New Management Agreement and the New Advisory Agreement and payable to the Sub-Advisers under the New Sub-Advisory Agreements was reasonable.
Profitability
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered information concerning the profitability of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo from providing services to the fund family as a whole. The Boards noted that Wells Capital’s profitability information with respect to providing services to each Fund

Wells Fargo Index Fund  |  61


Board considerations (unaudited)
and other funds in the family was subsumed in the WFAM and Wells Fargo profitability analysis. The Boards did not consider profitability with respect to the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, as the sub-advisory fees paid to the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers had been negotiated by Funds Management on an arm’s-length basis.
Funds Management reported on the methodologies and estimates used in calculating profitability in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, including a description of the methodology used to allocate certain expenses. Among other things, the Boards noted that the levels of profitability reported on a fund-by-fund basis varied widely, depending on factors such as the size, type and age of fund.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards received certain information about NewCo’s projected financial condition, and reviewed with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital the underlying assumptions on which such information was based. The Boards considered that NewCo is a newly formed entity, with no historical operations, revenues or expenses, and that it is difficult to predict with any degree of certainty the future profitability of NewCo and the Advisers from advisory activities under the New Agreements. The Boards considered that the fee rates payable under the New Agreements will not increase as a result of the Transaction as compared to the rates under the Current Agreements, and that the current contractual expense limitations applicable to each Fund will not increase. The Boards noted that if the New Agreements are approved by shareholders and the Transaction closes, the Boards will have the opportunity in the future to review the profitability of NewCo and the Advisers from advisory activities under the New Agreements with the Advisers.
Economies of scale
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered information about the potential for Funds Management to experience economies of scale in the provision of management services to the Funds and the Master Portfolios, the difficulties of calculating economies of scale at an individual fund level, and the extent to which potential scale benefits are shared with Fund shareholders. The Boards noted the existence of breakpoints in each Fund’s management fee structure and each Master Portfolio’s advisory fee structure, which operate generally to reduce each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s and expense ratios as they grows in size, and the size of each Fund and Master Portfolio and in relation to such breakpoints. The Boards considered that, in addition to advisory fee and management fee and advisory fee breakpoints, Funds Management shares potential economies of scale from its management business in a variety of ways, including through fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangements, competitive management fee rates set at the outset without regard to breakpoints, and investments in the business intended to enhance services available to shareholders.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards noted that NewCo and the Advisers may benefit from possible growth of the Funds and Master Portfolios resulting from enhanced distribution capabilities. However, the Boards noted that other factors could also affect the potential for economies of scale, and that it was not possible to quantify any potential future economies of scale. Based upon the information furnished to the Boards in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process and the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards concluded that Funds Management’s arrangements with respect to each Fund and Master Portfolio, including contractual breakpoints and expense limitation arrangements, constitute a reasonable approach to sharing potential economies of scale with the Fund and its shareholders and the Master Portfolio and its interest holders.
“Fall-out” benefits to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered information regarding potential “fall-out” or ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including Wells Capital, and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers as a result of their relationships with the Funds and the Master Portfolios, as applicable. Ancillary benefits could include, among others, benefits directly attributable to other relationships with the Funds and Master Portfolios and benefits potentially derived from an increase in Funds Management’s and the Wells Capital’s business as a result of their relationships with the Funds and the Master Portfolios. The Boards noted that various current affiliates of Funds Management may receive distribution-related fees, shareholder servicing payments and sub-transfer agency fees in respect of shares sold or held through them and services provided.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also reviewed information about any soft dollar credits earned and utilized by the Sub-Advisers, fees earned by Funds Management and Wells Capital from managing a private investment vehicle for the fund family’s securities lending collateral, and commissions earned by an affiliated broker of Wells Fargo from portfolio transactions.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards received information to the effect that the Transaction is not expected to have a material impact on the fall-out benefits currently realized by Funds Management and its affiliates, including Wells Capital, and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers. The information reviewed by the Boards also noted that several of the ancillary benefits identified for WFAM would be potential ancillary benefits for NewCo, including that the scale and reputation of

62  |  Wells Fargo Index Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
the Funds and Master Portfolios might benefit NewCo’s broader reputation, product initiatives, technology investment and talent acquisition. Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Boards did not find that any ancillary benefits expected to be received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including NewCo and Wells Capital and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, under the New Agreements were unreasonable.
Conclusion
At the Board Meeting, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Boards unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the New Agreements is reasonable, approved the New Agreements for a two-year term, and voted to recommend that Fund shareholders approve the New Agreements.

Wells Fargo Index Fund  |  63


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board Considerations - Interim Agreements
At a meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Board Meeting”), the Boards of Trustees (each, a “Board”, and collectively, the “Boards”) of Wells Fargo Funds Trust, Wells Fargo Master Trust, Wells Fargo Variable Trust, Wells Fargo Global Dividend Opportunity Fund, Wells Fargo Income Opportunities Fund, Wells Fargo Multi-Sector Income Fund and Wells Fargo Utilities and High Income Fund (each a “Trust”, and the series thereof, a “Fund”) reviewed and approved for the Trusts and Funds, as applicable: (i) interim investment management agreements (the “Interim Management Agreements”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”); (ii) interim investment advisory agreements (the “Interim Advisory Agreements”) with Funds Management; and (iii) interim sub-advisory agreements (the “Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements”) with each of Cooke & Bieler, L.P., Galliard Capital Management LLC (“Galliard”), Peregrine Capital Management Inc., Wells Capital Management LLC (“WellsCap”), and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited (“WFAMI”, and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”). Each Trustee on the Board is not an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) of the Funds (collectively, the “Independent Trustees”). The Interim Management Agreements, Interim Advisory Agreements, and Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements are collectively referred to as the “Interim Advisory Agreements.”
At the Board Meeting, the Boards reviewed and approved the continuation of existing investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements (the “Current Advisory Agreements”) for each Trust and Fund, as applicable. The factors considered and conclusions reached by the Boards in approving the Current Advisory Agreements are summarized in the section entitled “Board Considerations – Current Agreements” of this shareholder report. The Boards noted that Wells Fargo & Company has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”), which includes Funds Management, Galliard, WellsCap and WFAMI (the “Affiliated Sub-Advisers”), to a holding company affiliated with private funds of GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. (the “Transaction”). The Boards further noted that the Transaction would result in a change-of-control of Funds Management and the Affiliated Sub-Advisers, which would be considered to be an “assignment” under the 1940 Act that would terminate the Current Advisory Agreements. At the Board Meeting, the Boards also reviewed and approved new investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements (the “New Advisory Agreements”) for each Trust and Fund, as applicable, that would replace the Current Advisory Agreements upon consummation of the Transaction, subject to approval of the New Advisory Agreements by the applicable Trust’s or Fund’s shareholders. The factors considered and conclusions reached by the Boards in approving the New Advisory Agreements are summarized in the section entitled “Board Considerations – New Agreements” of this shareholder report.
At the Board Meeting, the Boards also approved the Interim Advisory Agreements, which will go into effect for a Trust or Fund only in the event that shareholders of such Trust or Fund do not approve the New Advisory Agreement(s) for the Trust or Fund by the closing date of the Transaction, when the Current Advisory Agreements will terminate. The Board noted that, in such a circumstance, the Interim Advisory Agreements will permit continuity of management by allowing Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to continue providing services to the Trust or Fund pursuant to the Interim Advisory Agreements while the Trust or Fund continues to solicit shareholder approval of such New Advisory Agreement(s). The Boards noted that the terms of the Interim Advisory Agreements are identical to those of the Current Advisory Agreements, except for the term and the addition of escrow provisions with respect to the advisory fees. The Boards also noted that the entities that would service the Funds and Trusts under the Interim Advisory Agreements are identical to those that provide services under the Current Advisory Agreements and those that will provide services under the New Advisory Agreements.
In approving the Interim Advisory Agreements, the Boards considered the same factors and reached the same conclusions as they considered and reached with respect to the Boards’ approvals of the Current Advisory Agreements and New Advisory Agreements, as applicable, which are described in separate Board Consideration sections within this shareholder report. Prior to the Board Meeting, including at a series of meetings held in April and May 2021, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. about the Interim Advisory Agreements and related matters. The Independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Interim Advisory Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately.
At the Board Meeting, after considering the factors and reaching the conclusions described in the separate Board Consideration sections within this shareholder report, the Boards unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and to each Sub-Adviser under each of the Interim Advisory Agreements was reasonable, and approved the Interim Advisory Agreements.

64  |  Wells Fargo Index Fund




For more information
More information about Wells Fargo Funds is available free upon request. To obtain literature, please write, visit the Fund's website, or call:
Wells Fargo Funds
P.O. Box 219967
Kansas City, MO 64121-9967
Website: wfam.com
Individual investors: 1-800-222-8222
Retail investment professionals: 1-888-877-9275
Institutional investment professionals: 1-866-765-0778
This report and the financial statements contained herein are submitted for the general information of the shareholders of the Fund. If this report is used for promotional purposes, distribution of the report must be accompanied or preceded by a current prospectus. Before investing, please consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of the investment. For a current prospectus and, if available, a summary prospectus, containing this information, call 1-800-222-8222 or visit the Fund's website at wfam.com. Read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) is the trade name for certain investment advisory/management firms owned by Wells Fargo & Company. These firms include but are not limited to Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC. Certain products managed by WFAM entities are distributed by Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC (a broker-dealer and Member FINRA).
This material is for general informational and educational purposes only and is NOT intended to provide investment advice or a recommendation of any kind - including a recommendation for any specific investment, strategy, or plan.
 INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED  ■  NO BANK GUARANTEE  ■  MAY LOSE VALUE 
© 2021 Wells Fargo & Company. All rights reserved.
PAR-0621-00763 07-21
A283/AR283 05-21


Annual Report
May 31, 2021
Wells Fargo
Small Company Growth Fund




Contents

2

6

10
Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund  

11
Financial statements  

12

13

14

15

20

25
Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio  

26
Financial statements  

32

33

34

35

36

41

42
Board considerations  

47

51

57
 
Reduce clutter.
Save trees.
Sign up for electronic delivery of prospectuses and shareholder reports at wellsfargo.com/ advantagedelivery
The views expressed and any forward-looking statements are as of May 31, 2021, unless otherwise noted, and are those of the Fund's portfolio managers and/or Wells Fargo Asset Management. Discussions of individual securities or the markets generally are not intended as individual recommendations. Future events or results may vary significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. The views expressed are subject to change at any time in response to changing circumstances in the market. Wells Fargo Asset Management and the Fund disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any views expressed or forward-looking statements.
 INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED  ■  NO BANK GUARANTEE  ■  MAY LOSE VALUE 

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund  |  1


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
Andrew Owen
President
Wells Fargo Funds
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to offer you this annual report for the Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021. Despite the initial challenges presented by the spread of COVID-19 cases and the business restrictions implemented throughout much of the world, global stocks showed robust returns, supported by global stimulus programs, a rapid vaccination rollout, and recovering consumer and corporate sentiment. Bond markets mostly produced positive returns, as investors searched for yield and diversification during difficult market stretches.
For the 12-month period, equities had robust returns, as policymakers continued to fight the effects of COVID-19. Emerging market stocks led both non-U.S. developed market equities and U.S. stocks. Gains by fixed-income securities were varied, though mostly positive. For the period, U.S. stocks, based on the S&P 500 Index,1 gained 40.32%. International stocks, as measured by the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net),2 returned 42.78%, while the MSCI EM Index (Net),3 had stronger performance, with a 51.00% gain. Among bond indexes, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index,4 returned -0.40%, the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (unhedged),5 gained 7.84%, the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index,6 returned 4.74%, and the ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index,7 returned 15.18%.
The COVID-19 lockdown began over a year ago.
By June, economies started to reopen and global central banks committed to do all they could to provide economic support through liquidity and low borrowing costs. U.S. economic activity was aided by one-time $1,200 stimulus checks and $600 weekly bonus unemployment benefits that lasted through July. However, unemployment remained historically high and COVID-19 cases began to increase by late June. China’s economic recovery began to pick up momentum.
July was broadly positive for equities and fixed income. However, economic data and a resurgence of COVID-19 cases underscored the urgent need to regain control of the pandemic. Second-quarter gross domestic product (GDP) shrank from the previous quarter by 9.5% and 12.1% in the U.S. and the eurozone, respectively. In contrast, China’s second-quarter GDP grew 3.2% year over year. The U.S. economy added 1.8 million jobs in July, but a double-digit jobless rate persisted.

1 The S&P 500 Index consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. It is a market-value-weighted index with each stock's weight in the index proportionate to its market value. You cannot invest directly in an index.
2 The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) All Country World Index (ACWI) ex USA Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed and emerging markets, excluding the United States. Source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI. You cannot invest directly in an index.

3 The MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure equity market performance of emerging markets. You cannot invest directly in an index.

4 The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based benchmark that measures the investment-grade, U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage pass-throughs), asset-backed securities, and commercial mortgage-backed securities. You cannot invest directly in an index.

5 The Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (unhedged) is an unmanaged index that provides a broad-based measure of the global investment-grade fixed-income markets excluding the U.S. dollar-denominated debt market. You cannot invest directly in an index.

6 The Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index composed of long-term tax-exempt bonds with a minimum credit rating of Baa. You cannot invest directly in an index.

7 The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index of domestic and Yankee high-yield bonds. The index tracks the performance of high-yield securities traded in the U.S. bond market. You cannot invest directly in an index. Copyright 2021. ICE Data Indices, LLC. All rights reserved.

2  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
The stock market continued to rally in August despite concerns over rising numbers of U.S. and European COVID-19 cases as well as the July expiration of the $600 weekly bonus unemployment benefit. Relatively strong second-quarter earnings boosted investor sentiment along with the U.S. Federal Reserve Board’s (Fed’s) announcement of a monetary policy shift expected to support longer-term low interest rates. U.S. manufacturing and services activity indexes beat expectations while the U.S. housing market maintained strength. In Europe, retail sales expanded and consumer confidence was steady. China’s economy continued to expand.
Stocks grew more volatile in September on mixed economic data. U.S. economic activity continued to grow. However, U.S. unemployment remained elevated at 7.9% in September. With the U.S. Congress delaying further fiscal relief and uncertainties surrounding a possible vaccine, doubts crept back into the financial markets. In the U.K., a lack of progress in Brexit talks weighed on markets. China’s economy picked up steam, fueled by increased global demand.
In October, capital markets stepped back from their six-month rally. Market volatility rose in advance of the U.S. election and amid a global increase in COVID-19 infections. Europe introduced tighter restrictions affecting economic activity. U.S. markets looked favorably at the prospect of Democratic control of the federal purse strings, which could lead to additional fiscal stimulus and a boost to economic activity. Meanwhile, China reported 4.9% third-quarter GDP growth.
Global stocks rallied in November, propelled by optimism over three promising COVID-19 vaccines. Reversing recent trends, value stocks outperformed growth stocks and cyclical stocks outpaced information technology (IT) stocks. However, U.S. unemployment remained elevated, with a net job loss of 10 million since February. The eurozone services Purchasing Managers' Index, a monthly survey of purchasing managers, contracted sharply while the region’s manufacturing activity grew. The U.S. election results added to the upbeat mood as investors anticipated more consistent policies in the new administration.
Financial markets ended the year with strength on high expectations for a rapid rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines, the successful passage of a $900 billion stimulus package, and rising expectations of additional economic support from a Democratic-led Congress. U.S. economic data were mixed with still-elevated unemployment and weak retail sales but growth in manufacturing output. In contrast, China’s economic expansion continued in both manufacturing and nonmanufacturing. U.S. COVID-19 infection rates continued to rise even as new state and local lockdown measures were implemented.
The calendar year 2021 began with emerging market stocks leading all major asset classes in January, driven by China’s strong economic growth and a broad recovery in corporate earnings, which propelled China’s stock market higher. In the U.S., positive news on vaccine trials and January expansion in both the manufacturing and services sectors was offset by a weak December monthly jobs report. This was compounded by technical factors as some hedge funds were forced to sell stocks to protect themselves against a well-publicized short squeeze coordinated by a group of retail investors. Eurozone sentiment and economic growth were particularly weak, reflecting the impact of a new lockdown with stricter social distancing along with a slow vaccine rollout.
February saw major domestic equity indexes driven higher on the hope of a new stimulus bill, improving COVID-19 vaccination numbers, and the gradual reopening of the economy. Most S&P 500 companies reported better-than-expected earnings, with positive surprises coming from the financials, IT, health care, and materials sectors. Japan saw its economy strengthen as a result of strong export numbers. Meanwhile, crude oil prices continued their climb, rising more than 25% for the year. Domestic government bonds experienced a sharp sell-off in late February as markets priced in a more robust economic recovery and higher future growth and inflation expectations.
Global stocks rallied in November, propelled by optimism over three promising COVID-19 vaccines.

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund  |  3


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
The passage of the massive domestic stimulus bill highlighted March activity, leading to increased forecasts for U.S. growth in 2021.
The passage of the massive domestic stimulus bill highlighted March activity, leading to increased forecasts for U.S. growth in 2021. Domestic employment surged as COVID-19 vaccinations and an increasingly open economy spurred hiring. A majority of U.S. small companies reported they were operating at pre-pandemic capacity or higher. Value stocks continued its outperformance of growth stocks in the month, continuing the trend that started in late 2020. Meanwhile, most major developed global equity indexes were up month to date on the back of rising optimism regarding the outlook for global growth. While the U.S. and U.K. have been the most successful in terms of the vaccine rollout, even in markets where the vaccine has lagged, such as in the eurozone and Japan, equity indexes in many of those countries have also been in positive territory this year.
Equity markets produced another strong showing in April. Domestically, the continued reopening of the economy had a strong impact on positive equity performance, as people started leaving their households and jobless claims continued to fall. Domestic corporate bonds performed well and the U.S. dollar weakened. Meanwhile, the U.S. government continued to seek to invest in the recovery, this time by outlining a package of over $2 billion to improve infrastructure. The primary headwind in April was inflation, as investors tried to determine the breadth and longevity of recent price increases. Developed Europe has been supported by a meaningful increase in the pace of vaccinations. Unfortunately many emerging market countries have not been as successful. India in particular has seen COVID-19 cases surge, serving as an example of the need to get vaccinations rolled out to less developed nations.
Vaccine rollouts continued in May, leading to loosened restrictions globally. As a result, equity markets in general saw a minor increase in returns. Concerns that the continued economic rebound could result in inflation increases becoming more than transitory were supported by the higher input costs businesses are experiencing. Meanwhile, those inflation concerns were tempered by the Fed, which stayed steady on its view of the economy and eased fears of a sudden and substantial policy change. Positive performance in the emerging market equity space was supported this month by steady consumer demand and strong commodity prices. Fixed-income markets were also slightly positive for the month, driven by inflation uncertainty and a softer U.S. dollar.
Don’t let short-term uncertainty derail long-term investment goals.
Periods of investment uncertainty can present challenges, but experience has taught us that maintaining long-term investment goals can be an effective way to plan for the future. Although diversification cannot guarantee an investment profit or prevent losses, we believe it can be an effective way to manage investment risk and potentially smooth out overall portfolio performance. We encourage investors to know their investments and to understand that appropriate levels of risk-taking may unlock opportunities.
Thank you for choosing to invest with Wells Fargo Funds. We appreciate your confidence in us and remain committed to helping you meet your financial needs.
Sincerely,
Andrew Owen
President
Wells Fargo Funds

For further information about your Fund, contact your investment professional, visit our website at wfam.com, or call us directly at 1-800-222-8222.

4  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund


This page is intentionally left blank.


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Investment objective The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
Manager Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC
Subadviser for the affiliated master portfolio*
Peregrine Capital Management, LLC
Portfolio managers William A. Grierson, CFA®, Daniel J. Hagen, CFA®, Paul E. von Kuster, CFA®, Ryan H. Smith, CFA®, Samuel D. Smith, CFA®
    
Average annual total returns (%) as of May 31, 2021
    Including sales charge   Excluding sales charge   Expense ratios1 (%)
  Inception date 1 year 5 year 10 year   1 year 5 year 10 year   Gross Net 2
Class A (WFSAX) 1-30-2004 45.00 16.24 11.77   53.84 17.62 12.43   1.33 1.29
Class C (WSMCX) 1-30-2004 51.86 16.77 11.60   52.86 16.77 11.60   2.08 2.04
Class R6 (WSCRX)3 10-31-2014   54.53 18.13 12.94   0.90 0.86
Administrator Class (NVSCX) 11-11-1994   54.02 17.76 12.62   1.25 1.19
Institutional Class (WSCGX) 3-31-2008   54.39 18.05 12.90   1.00 0.94
Russell 2000® Growth Index4   50.14 17.57 12.76  
Figures quoted represent past performance, which is no guarantee of future results, and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder may pay on an investment in a fund. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance shown without sales charges would be lower if sales charges were reflected. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted, which assumes the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. Current month-end performance is available on the Fund’s website, wfam.com.
Please keep in mind that high double-digit returns were primarily achieved during favorable market conditions. You should not expect that such favorable returns can be consistently achieved. A fund’s performance, especially for short time periods, should not be the sole factor in making your investment decision.
Index returns do not include transaction costs associated with buying and selling securities, any mutual fund fees or expenses, or any taxes. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
For Class A shares, the maximum front-end sales charge is 5.75%. For Class C shares, the maximum contingent deferred sales charge is 1.00%. Performance including a contingent deferred sales charge assumes the sales charge for the corresponding time period. Class R6, Administrator Class, and Institutional Class shares are sold without a front-end sales charge or contingent deferred sales charge.
1 Reflects the expense ratios as stated in the most recent prospectuses, which include the impact of 0.01% in acquired fund fees and expenses. The expense ratios shown are subject to change and may differ from the annualized expense ratios shown in the financial highlights of this report, which do not include acquired fund fees and expenses.
2 The manager has contractually committed through September 30, 2021, to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers at 1.29% for Class A, 2.04% for Class C, 0.86% for Class R6, 1.19% for Administrator Class, and 0.94% for Institutional Class. Brokerage commissions, stamp duty fees, interest, taxes, acquired fund fees and expenses (if any) from funds in which the affiliated master portfolio invests, and extraordinary expenses are excluded from the expense caps. Net expenses from the affiliated master portfolio are included in the expense caps. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. Without these caps, the Fund’s returns would have been lower. The expense ratio paid by an investor is the net expense ratio (the total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers) as stated in the prospectuses.
3 Historical performance shown for the Class R6 shares prior to their inception reflects the performance of the Institutional Class shares, and includes the higher expenses applicable to the Institutional Class shares. If these expenses had been included, returns for the Class R6 shares would be higher.
4 The Russell 2000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 companies with higher price/book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. You cannot invest directly in an index.

* The Fund is a feeder fund in a master-feeder structure that invests substantially all of its assets in a single affiliated master portfolio of the Wells Fargo Master Trust with a substantially identical investment objective and substantially similar investment strategies. References to the investment activities of the Fund are intended to refer to the investment activities of the affiliated master portfolio in which it invests.
CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.
Ryan Smith and Samuel Smith became portfolio managers of the Fund on January 12, 2021.

6  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Growth of $10,000 investment as of May 31, 20211
1 The chart compares the performance of Class A shares for the most recent ten years with the Russell 2000® Growth Index. The chart assumes a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in Class A shares and reflects all operating expenses and assumes the maximum initial sales charge of 5.75%.
Stock values fluctuate in response to the activities of individual companies and general market and economic conditions. Smaller-company stocks tend to be more volatile and less liquid than those of larger companies. Certain investment strategies tend to increase the total risk of an investment (relative to the broader market). The Fund is exposed to foreign investment risk. Consult the Fund’s prospectus for additional information on these and other risks.

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund  |  7


Performance highlights (unaudited)
MANAGER'S DISCUSSION
Fund highlights
The Fund outperformed the Russell 2000® Growth Index for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021.
Stock selection in financials and health care were the largest contributors to performance in the period.
Stock selection within information technology (IT) and consumer discretionary were the largest detractors from performance in the period.
Vaccine deployment and stimulus measures supported the equity environment.
Markets followed a linear path upward in the trailing 12-month period. Despite two massive spikes in worldwide COVID-19 cases, investors looked forward, placing greater focus on vaccine development and broad fiscal and monetary support. The successful development of an effective vaccine and unwavering government stimulus created a positive environment for equities during the period. Broad-based vaccine deployment enabled a gradual reopening of the economy in 2021 and sparked a sharp rotation in market leadership. As the fiscal year progressed, investors moved out of the highly valued momentum names that had worked well throughout the pandemic uncertainty and into more cyclically levered areas of the market that have been left behind. This more normalized or broadening of market returns has been a positive tailwind to the Fund’s more valuation-sensitive approach.
The Fund remained consistent with its long-term discipline of investing in rapidly growing companies purchased at attractive valuations. Relative to the benchmark, the Fund is currently most overweight companies in the financial services and industrials sectors that should benefit from improved economic growth and company fundamentals. Conversely, the Fund is most underweight the consumer discretionary and health care sectors where valuations are currently less attractive.
Financials and health care were the top-contributing sectors for the fiscal year. Positive outperformance in financials was broad-based with strength across the Fund’s capital markets, banking, and insurance holdings. Within capital markets, robust equity underwriting and merger and acquisition activity aided Evercore Partners Incorporated and Stifel Financial, while a rising yield curve and strong fundamental demand drove banking names SVB Financial Group* and Triumph Bancorp, Incorporated. Rapidly growing insurance brokers Goosehead Insurance, Incorporated, and BRP Group, Incorporated, were also strong contributors to performance in the period. Within health care, outperformance was driven by both our underweight position to this underperforming sector as well as strength in biotechnology holdings Immunomedics Incorporated*, and MyoKardia Incorporated*
and health care technology companies Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Incorporated, and Omnicell, Incorporated.
Ten largest holdings (%) as of May 31, 20211
PTC Incorporated 1.71
Syneos Health Incorporated 1.70
Nuance Communications Incorporated 1.48
ASGN Incorporated 1.45
Element Solutions Incorporated 1.37
Avantor Incorporated 1.33
SS&C Technologies Holdings Incorporated 1.32
International Game Technology 1.29
Ciena Corporation 1.25
Omnicell Incorporated 1.23
1 Each holding represents the Fund’s allocable portion of the affiliated master portfolio security. Figures represent each holding as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets. Holdings are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
IT was the largest detractor from performance for the fiscal year. Weakness was primarily driven by optical equipment company Ciena Corporation and mortgage servicing and origination software company Black Knight, Incorporated. Underperformance in Ciena was driven by a temporary slowdown in new equipment orders as customers delayed new deployments due to pandemic-related uncertainty, while weakness in Black Knight was primarily due to a government-mandated moratorium in foreclosure activity that temporarily eliminated a high-margin source of revenue for the company. The consumer discretionary sector also detracted from Fund performance in the period as weakness was primarily due to the Fund’s underweight position to this outperforming sector.
Markets showing signs of normalization.
We are encouraged by the early signs that markets have begun to normalize after a prolonged period of dominance by excessively valued and high momentum stocks. The recent increase in interest rates has very quickly imparted a sense of discipline back into markets with respect to valuation. Areas of excess, such as high-value tech, biotech, pockets within
 

* This security was no longer held at the end of the reporting period.

8  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund


Performance highlights (unaudited)
renewable energy, and the special purpose acquisition company mania, have shown cracks, which has led to outperformance by a much broader segment of the market. While recent, we believe these dynamics could persist for some time. We are in the early innings of an economic expansion underpinned by significant pent-up consumer demand, growing business confidence, and unprecedented government support, which has driven this broadening of market returns. As recent performance has shown, this broadening benefits a valuation-conscious style such as ours, as many strong growth stories trading at attractive valuations, which have been long ignored by the market, have come back into favor.
Sector allocation as of May 31, 20211
1 Figures represent the sector allocation of the affiliated master portfolio as a percentage of the long-term investments of the affiliated master portfolio. These amounts are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund  |  9


Fund expenses (unaudited)
As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and contingent deferred sales charges (if any) on redemptions and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) and/or shareholder servicing fees, and other Fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period from December 1, 2020 to May 31, 2021.
Actual expenses
The “Actual” line of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the “Actual” line under the heading entitled “Expenses paid during period” for your applicable class of shares to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes
The “Hypothetical” line of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) and contingent deferred sales charges. Therefore, the “Hypothetical” line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
  Beginning
account value
12-1-2020
Ending
account value
5-31-2021
Expenses
paid during
the period1,2
Annualized net
expense ratio2
Class A        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,197.17 $ 7.07 1.29%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,018.50 $ 6.49 1.29%
Class C        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,192.91 $11.15 2.04%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,014.76 $10.25 2.04%
Class R6        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,199.84 $ 4.72 0.86%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,020.64 $ 4.33 0.86%
Administrator Class        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,197.96 $ 6.52 1.19%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,019.00 $ 5.99 1.19%
Institutional Class        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,199.31 $ 5.15 0.94%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,020.24 $ 4.73 0.94%
1 Expenses paid is equal to the annualized net expense ratio of each class multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one-half-year period).
2 Amounts reflect net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio in which the Fund invests.

10  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

          Value
Investment companies:  100.47%          
Affiliated master portfolio:  100.47%          
Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio         $1,349,006,660
Total Investment companies (Cost $818,273,541)         1,349,006,660
Total investments in securities (Cost $818,273,541) 100.47%       1,349,006,660
Other assets and liabilities, net (0.47)          (6,360,836)
Total net assets 100.00%       $1,342,645,824
Transactions with the affiliated Master Portfolio were as follows:
  % of
ownership,
beginning
of period
% of
ownership,
end of
period
Net realized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Dividends
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Affiliated
income
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Value,
end of
period
% of
net
assets
Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio 98.08% 97.88% $376,204,644 $243,393,279 $6,157,985 $124,625 $1,349,006,660 100.47%
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund  |  11


Statement of assets and liabilities—May 31, 2021
   
Assets  
Investments in affiliated Master Portfolio, at value (cost $818,273,541)

$ 1,349,006,660
Receivable for Fund shares sold

2,318,075
Total assets

1,351,324,735
Liabilities  
Payable for Fund shares redeemed

8,373,060
Administration fees payable

118,002
Management fee payable

15,397
Distribution fee payable

5,898
Accrued expenses and other liabilities

166,554
Total liabilities

8,678,911
Total net assets

$1,342,645,824
Net assets consist of  
Paid-in capital

$ 609,726,171
Total distributable earnings

732,919,653
Total net assets

$1,342,645,824
Computation of net asset value and offering price per share  
Net assets – Class A

$ 44,249,166
Shares outstanding – Class A1

720,145
Net asset value per share – Class A

$61.44
Maximum offering price per share – Class A2

$65.19
Net assets – Class C

$ 9,234,649
Shares outstanding – Class C1

182,318
Net asset value per share – Class C

$50.65
Net assets – Class R6

$ 407,310,572
Shares outstanding – Class R61

5,994,196
Net asset value per share – Class R6

$67.95
Net assets – Administrator Class

$ 62,091,833
Shares outstanding – Administrator Class1

955,522
Net asset value per share – Administrator Class

$64.98
Net assets – Institutional Class

$ 819,759,604
Shares outstanding – Institutional Class1

12,122,447
Net asset value per share – Institutional Class

$67.62
1 The Fund has an unlimited number of authorized shares.
2 Maximum offering price is computed as 100/94.25 of net asset value. On investments of $50,000 or more, the offering price is reduced.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

12  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund


Statement of operations—year ended May 31, 2021
   
Investment income  
Dividends allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

$ 6,157,985
Affiliated income allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

124,625
Expenses allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

(11,105,410)
Total investment income

(4,822,800)
Expenses  
Management fee

701,620
Administration fees  
Class A

84,736
Class C

20,023
Class R6

132,697
Administrator Class

78,366
Institutional Class

1,105,975
Shareholder servicing fees  
Class A

100,587
Class C

23,786
Administrator Class

150,391
Distribution fee  
Class C

71,226
Custody and accounting fees

50,193
Professional fees

34,680
Registration fees

102,737
Shareholder report expenses

139,025
Trustees’ fees and expenses

21,080
Other fees and expenses

46,075
Total expenses

2,863,197
Less: Fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements  
Fund-level

(644,241)
Class A

(436)
Class C

(8)
Administrator Class

(6,028)
Institutional Class

(85,075)
Net expenses

2,127,409
Net investment loss

(6,950,209)
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments  
Net realized gains on securities transactions allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

376,204,644
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on securities transactions allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

243,393,279
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

619,597,923
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

$612,647,714
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund  |  13


Statement of changes in net assets
         
  Year ended
May 31, 2021
Year ended
May 31, 2020
Operations        
Net investment loss

  $ (6,950,209)   $ (5,409,448)
Net realized gains on investments

  376,204,644   107,501,645
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

  243,393,279   (28,564,804)
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

  612,647,714   73,527,393
Distributions to shareholders from        
Net investment income and net realized gains        
Class A

  (5,976,918)   (4,577,702)
Class C

  (1,628,455)   (1,219,067)
Class R6

  (56,097,914)   (43,043,975)
Administrator Class

  (8,234,181)   (6,401,809)
Institutional Class

  (121,915,798)   (80,415,302)
Total distributions to shareholders

  (193,853,266)   (135,657,855)
Capital share transactions Shares   Shares  
Proceeds from shares sold        
Class A

191,250 10,831,002 188,284 8,973,220
Class C

11,378 530,387 5,111 206,315
Class R6

1,135,839 70,387,361 1,859,972 92,450,593
Administrator Class

140,592 8,368,325 170,705 8,517,203
Institutional Class

2,938,525 180,832,983 4,127,985 204,967,976
    270,950,058   315,115,307
Reinvestment of distributions        
Class A

99,100 5,314,718 79,105 3,985,289
Class C

34,708 1,539,630 24,921 1,076,603
Class R6

860,364 50,924,923 698,418 38,147,601
Administrator Class

144,949 8,217,170 121,124 6,394,121
Institutional Class

1,402,732 82,663,012 1,085,956 59,130,286
    148,659,453   108,733,900
Payment for shares redeemed        
Class A

(353,897) (19,407,294) (793,982) (38,317,325)
Class C

(98,121) (4,589,705) (122,441) (5,026,553)
Class R6

(5,125,700) (309,662,461) (4,156,884) (211,307,944)
Administrator Class

(474,181) (27,971,851) (866,918) (42,999,639)
Institutional Class

(7,943,243) (491,545,106) (9,445,990) (485,047,988)
    (853,176,417)   (782,699,449)
Net decrease in net assets resulting from capital share transactions

  (433,566,906)   (358,850,242)
Total decrease in net assets

  (14,772,458)   (420,980,704)
Net assets        
Beginning of period

  1,357,418,282   1,778,398,986
End of period

  $1,342,645,824   $1,357,418,282
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

14  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class A 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$46.62 $48.98 $56.66 $44.26 $37.69
Net investment loss

(0.47) 1 (0.34) 1 (0.36) (0.35) 1 (0.28) 1
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

24.27 2.49 (3.22) 12.75 6.85
Total from investment operations

23.80 2.15 (3.58) 12.40 6.57
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net realized gains

(8.98) (4.51) (4.10) 0.00 0.00
Net asset value, end of period

$61.44 $46.62 $48.98 $56.66 $44.26
Total return2

53.84% 3.70% (6.13)% 28.02% 17.43%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

1.33% 1.32% 1.31% 1.32% 1.33%
Net expenses

1.29% 1.32% 1.31% 1.32% 1.33%
Net investment loss

(0.85)% (0.69)% (0.63)% (0.71)% (0.68)%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate3

44% 41% 54% 37% 82%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$44,249 $36,534 $64,182 $76,065 $76,087
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.79%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.78%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.78%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.78%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.78%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges.
3 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund  |  15


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class C 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$39.84 $42.75 $50.38 $39.65 $34.02
Net investment loss

(0.75) 1 (0.61) 1 (0.66) 1 (0.64) 1 (0.54) 1
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

20.54 2.21 (2.87) 11.37 6.17
Total from investment operations

19.79 1.60 (3.53) 10.73 5.63
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net realized gains

(8.98) (4.51) (4.10) 0.00 0.00
Net asset value, end of period

$50.65 $39.84 $42.75 $50.38 $39.65
Total return2

52.86% 2.92% (6.82)% 27.06% 16.55%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

2.08% 2.07% 2.06% 2.07% 2.08%
Net expenses

2.04% 2.07% 2.06% 2.07% 2.08%
Net investment loss

(1.60)% (1.44)% (1.38)% (1.47)% (1.43)%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate3

44% 41% 54% 37% 82%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$9,235 $9,336 $13,968 $19,979 $22,410
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.79%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.78%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.78%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.78%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.78%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges.
3 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

16  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class R6 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$50.64 $52.65 $60.31 $46.91 $39.77
Net investment loss

(0.17) (0.14) 1 (0.12) (0.14) (0.11)
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

26.46 2.64 (3.44) 13.54 7.25
Total from investment operations

26.29 2.50 (3.56) 13.40 7.14
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net realized gains

(8.98) (4.51) (4.10) 0.00 0.00
Net asset value, end of period

$67.95 $50.64 $52.65 $60.31 $46.91
Total return

54.53% 4.12% (5.73)% 28.59% 17.95%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

0.90% 0.90% 0.88% 0.89% 0.90%
Net expenses

0.86% 0.89% 0.88% 0.89% 0.90%
Net investment loss

(0.41)% (0.27)% (0.20)% (0.29)% (0.25)%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate2

44% 41% 54% 37% 82%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$407,311 $462,050 $564,516 $618,523 $418,111
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.79%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.78%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.78%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.78%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.78%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund  |  17


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Administrator Class 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$48.87 $51.10 $58.85 $45.91 $39.05
Net investment loss

(0.44) 1 (0.29) 1 (0.29) 1 (0.30) 1 (0.24) 1
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

25.53 2.57 (3.36) 13.24 7.10
Total from investment operations

25.09 2.28 (3.65) 12.94 6.86
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net realized gains

(8.98) (4.51) (4.10) 0.00 0.00
Net asset value, end of period

$64.98 $48.87 $51.10 $58.85 $45.91
Total return

54.02% 3.80% (6.02)% 28.19% 17.57%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

1.25% 1.24% 1.23% 1.24% 1.25%
Net expenses

1.19% 1.20% 1.20% 1.20% 1.20%
Net investment loss

(0.74)% (0.57)% (0.51)% (0.60)% (0.55)%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate2

44% 41% 54% 37% 82%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$62,092 $55,917 $87,850 $114,429 $130,311
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.79%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.78%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.78%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.78%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.78%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

18  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Institutional Class 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$50.47 $52.51 $60.20 $46.85 $39.75
Net investment loss

(0.29) (0.17) 1 (0.15) (0.19) (0.15)
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

26.42 2.64 (3.44) 13.54 7.25
Total from investment operations

26.13 2.47 (3.59) 13.35 7.10
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net realized gains

(8.98) (4.51) (4.10) 0.00 0.00
Net asset value, end of period

$67.62 $50.47 $52.51 $60.20 $46.85
Total return

54.39% 4.07% (5.77)% 28.50% 17.86%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

1.00% 1.00% 0.98% 0.99% 1.00%
Net expenses

0.94% 0.95% 0.95% 0.95% 0.95%
Net investment loss

(0.49)% (0.32)% (0.26)% (0.35)% (0.31)%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate2

44% 41% 54% 37% 82%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$819,760 $793,581 $1,047,883 $1,169,555 $1,014,847
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.79%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.78%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.78%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.78%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.78%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund  |  19


Notes to financial statements
1. ORGANIZATION
Wells Fargo Funds Trust (the "Trust"), a Delaware statutory trust organized on March 10, 1999, is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). As an investment company, the Trust follows the accounting and reporting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, Financial Services – Investment Companies. These financial statements report on the Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund (the "Fund") which is a diversified series of the Trust.
The Fund is a feeder fund in a master-feeder structure that invests substantially all of its assets in a single master portfolio with a substantially identical investment objective and substantially similar investment strategies. The Fund invests in Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio, a separate diversified portfolio (the “affiliated Master Portfolio”) of Wells Fargo Master Trust, a registered open-end management investment company. As of May 31, 2021, the Fund owned 97.88% of Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio. The affiliated Master Portfolio directly acquires portfolio securities and the Fund acquires an indirect interest in those securities. The Fund accounts for its investment in the affiliated Master Portfolio as a partnership investment and records on a daily basis its share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s income, expense and realized and unrealized gains and losses. The financial statements of the affiliated Master Portfolio for the year ended May 31, 2021 are included in this report and should be read in conjunction with the Fund’s financial statements.
On February 23, 2021, Wells Fargo & Company announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management ("WFAM") to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. WFAM is the trade name used by the asset management businesses of Wells Fargo & Company and includes Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the investment manager to the Fund, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, both registered investment advisers providing sub-advisory services to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Fund's principal underwriter. As part of the transaction, Wells Fargo & Company will own a 9.9% equity interest and will continue to serve as an important client and distribution partner.
Consummation of the transaction will result in the automatic termination of the Fund's investment management agreement and subadvisory agreement. The Fund's Board of Trustees approved a new investment management and new subadvisory agreement and approved submitting the agreements to the Fund’s shareholders for approval at a special meeting of shareholders expected to be held on August 16, 2021. Shareholders of record of the Fund at the close of business on May 28, 2021 are entitled to vote at the meeting. If shareholders approve the new agreements, they would take effect upon the closing of the transaction. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
This shareholder report is not asking you for a proxy. A separate proxy statement with more detailed information about the transaction will be provided to Fund shareholders and should be reviewed carefully.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following significant accounting policies, which are consistently followed in the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund, are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Securities valuation
All investments are valued each business day as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4 p.m. Eastern Time), although the Fund may deviate from this calculation time under unusual or unexpected circumstances.
Investments in the affiliated Master Portfolio are valued daily based on the Fund’s proportionate share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s net assets, which are also valued daily. Securities held in the affiliated Master Portfolio are valued as discussed in the Notes to Financial Statements of the affiliated Master Portfolio, which are included elsewhere in this report.
Investments which are not valued using any of the methods discussed above are valued at their fair value, as determined in good faith by the Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees has established a Valuation Committee comprised of the Trustees and has delegated to it the authority to take any actions regarding the valuation of portfolio securities that the Valuation Committee deems necessary or appropriate, including determining the fair value of portfolio securities, unless the determination has been delegated to the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee at Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC ("Funds Management"). The Board of Trustees retains the authority to make or ratify any valuation decisions or approve any changes to the Valuation Procedures as it deems appropriate. On a quarterly basis, the Board of Trustees

20  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund


Notes to financial statements
receives reports on any valuation actions taken by the Valuation Committee or the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee which may include items for ratification.
Investment transactions, income and expenses
Investments in the affiliated Master Portfolio are recorded on a trade date basis. The Fund records daily its proportionate share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s income, expenses and realized and unrealized gains or losses. The Fund also accrues its own expenses.
Distributions to shareholders
Distributions to shareholders from net investment income and any net realized gains are recorded on the ex-dividend date and paid at least annually. Such distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations and may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Dividend sources are estimated at the time of declaration. The tax character of distributions is determined as of the Fund's fiscal year end. Therefore, a portion of the Fund's distributions made prior to the Fund’s fiscal year end may be categorized as a tax return of capital at year end.
Federal and other taxes
The Fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by distributing substantially all of its investment company taxable income and any net realized capital gains (after reduction for capital loss carryforwards) sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes. Accordingly, no provision for federal income taxes was required.
The Fund’s income and federal excise tax returns and all financial records supporting those returns for the prior three fiscal years are subject to examination by the federal and Delaware revenue authorities. Management has analyzed the Fund's tax positions taken on federal, state, and foreign tax returns for all open tax years and does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability.
As of May 31, 2021, the aggregate cost of all investments for federal income tax purposes was $829,673,832 and the unrealized gains (losses) consisted of:
Gross unrealized gains $530,733,119
Gross unrealized losses (11,400,291)
Net unrealized gains $519,332,828
Class allocations
The separate classes of shares offered by the Fund differ principally in applicable sales charges, distribution, shareholder servicing, and administration fees. Class specific expenses are charged directly to that share class. Investment income, common fund-level expenses, and realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative proportion of net assets of each class.
3. FAIR VALUATION MEASUREMENTS
At May 31, 2021, the Fund’s investment in an affiliated Master Portfolio was measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient. The investment objective and fair value of the affiliated Master Portfolio is as follows:
Affiliated Master Portfolio Investment objective Fair value of affiliated
Master Portfolio
Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio Seek long-term capital appreciation $1,349,006,660
The affiliated Master Portfolio does not have a redemption period notice, can be redeemed daily and does not have any unfunded commitments.
4. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
Management fee
Funds Management, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company ("Wells Fargo"), is the manager of the Fund and provides advisory and fund-level administrative services under an investment management agreement. Under the investment management agreement, Funds Management is responsible for, among other services, implementing the investment objectives and strategies of the Fund and providing fund-level administrative services in connection with the Fund’s

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund  |  21


Notes to financial statements
operations. As long as the Fund continues to invest substantially all of its assets in a single affiliated Master Portfolio, the Fund pays Funds Management an investment management fee only for fund-level administrative services at the following annual rate based on the Fund’s average daily net assets:
Average daily net assets Management fee
First $5 billion 0.050%
Next $5 billion 0.040
Over $10 billion 0.030
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the management fee was equivalent to an annual rate of 0.05% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
Funds Management also serves as the adviser to the affiliated Master Portfolio and is entitled to receive a fee from the affiliated Master Portfolio for those services.
Administration fees
Under a class-level administration agreement, Funds Management provides class-level administrative services to the Fund, which includes paying fees and expenses for services provided by the transfer agent, sub-transfer agents, omnibus account servicers and record-keepers. As compensation for its services under the class-level administration agreement, Funds Management receives an annual fee which is calculated based on the average daily net assets of each class as follows:
  Class-level
administration fee
Class A 0.21%
Class C 0.21
Class R6 0.03
Administrator Class 0.13
Institutional Class 0.13
Waivers and/or expense reimbursements
Funds Management has contractually waived and/or reimbursed management and administration fees to the extent necessary to maintain certain net operating expense ratios for the Fund. When each class of the Fund has exceeded its expense cap, Funds Management has waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses from fund-level expenses on a proportionate basis and then from class specific expenses. When only certain classes exceed their expense caps, waivers and/or reimbursements are applied against class specific expenses before fund-level expenses. Net expenses from the affiliated Master Portfolio are included in the expense caps. Funds Management has committed through September 30, 2021 to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap expenses. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. The contractual expense caps are as follows:
  Expense ratio caps
Class A 1.29%
Class C 2.04
Class R6 0.86
Administrator Class 1.19
Institutional Class 0.94
Distribution fee
The Trust has adopted a distribution plan for Class C shares of the Fund pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. A distribution fee is charged to Class C shares and paid to Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC ("Funds Distributor"), the principal underwriter, at an annual rate of 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class C shares.

22  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund


Notes to financial statements
In addition, Funds Distributor is entitled to receive the front-end sales charge from the purchase of Class A shares and a contingent deferred sales charge on the redemption of certain Class A shares. Funds Distributor is also entitled to receive the contingent deferred sales charges from redemptions of Class C shares. Funds Distributor did not receive any front-end or contingent deferred sales charges from Class A or Class C shares for the year ended May 31, 2021.
Shareholder servicing fees
The Trust has entered into contracts with one or more shareholder servicing agents, whereby Class A, Class C, and Administrator Class of the Fund are charged a fee at an annual rate of 0.25% of the average daily net assets of each respective class. A portion of these total shareholder servicing fees were paid to affiliates of Wells Fargo.
5. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS
The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing substantially all of its assets in a single affiliated Master Portfolio. Purchases and sales have been calculated by multiplying the Fund's ownership percentage of the affiliated Master Portfolio by the affiliated Master Portfolio's purchases and sales. Purchases and sales of investments, excluding U.S. government obligations (if any) and short-term securities, for the year ended May 31, 2021 were $593,403,114 and $1,221,419,511, respectively.
6. BANK BORROWINGS
The Trust (excluding the money market funds), Wells Fargo Master Trust and Wells Fargo Variable Trust are parties to a $350,000,000 revolving credit agreement whereby the Fund is permitted to use bank borrowings for temporary or emergency purposes, such as to fund shareholder redemption requests. Interest under the credit agreement is charged to the Fund based on a borrowing rate equal to the higher of the Federal Funds rate in effect on that day plus 1.25% or the overnight LIBOR rate in effect on that day plus 1.25%. In addition, an annual commitment fee equal to 0.25% of the unused balance is allocated to each participating fund.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, there were no borrowings by the Fund under the agreement.
7. DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS
The tax character of distributions paid during the years ended May 31, 2021 and May 31, 2020 were as follows:
  Year ended May 31
  2021 2020
Ordinary income $ 46,221,198 $ 12,251,811
Long-term capital gain 147,632,068 123,406,044
As of May 31, 2021, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Undistributed
ordinary
income
Undistributed
long-term
gain
Unrealized
gains
$34,542,800 $179,044,025 $519,332,828
8. CONCENTRATION RISKS
Concentration risks result from exposure to a limited number of sectors. Through its investment in the affiliated Master Portfolio which may invest a substantial portion of its assets in any sector, the Fund may in turn be more affected by changes in that sector than a fund whose investments are not heavily weighted in any sector. As of the end of the period, the affiliated Master Portfolio concentrated its portfolio in investments related to the health care sector.
9. INDEMNIFICATION
Under the Fund's organizational documents, the officers and Trustees have been granted certain indemnification rights against certain liabilities that may arise out of performance of their duties to the Fund. The Fund has entered into a separate agreement with each Trustee that converts indemnification rights currently existing under the Fund’s organizational documents into contractual rights that cannot be changed in the future without the consent of the Trustee. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with service providers that contain a variety of indemnification

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund  |  23


Notes to financial statements
clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent on future claims that may be made against the Fund and, therefore, cannot be estimated.
10. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
In August 2018, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 updates the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Management has adopted this guidance which did not have a material impact on the financial statements.
11. CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization announced that it had made the assessment that coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) is a pandemic. The impacts of COVID-19 are affecting the entire global economy, individual companies and investment products, the funds, and the market in general. There is significant uncertainty around the extent and duration of business disruptions related to COVID-19 and the impacts may last for an extended period of time. COVID-19 has led to significant uncertainty and volatility in the financial markets.
12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
At a meeting held July 15, 2021, the Board of Trustees of the Wells Fargo Funds approved a change in the Fund's name to remove “Wells Fargo” from the Fund's name and replace with “Allspring”. The change is expected to go into effect on October 11, 2021.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) announced that it will be changing its company name to Allspring Global Investments upon the closing of the previously announced sale transaction of WFAM by Wells Fargo & Company to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. The new corporate name is expected to go into effect on the closing date of the transaction, which is anticipated to occur in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
Following the closing of the transaction, Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the Fund's investment manager, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, each sub-advisers to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Fund's principal underwriter, will each be rebranded as Allspring.

24  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund


Report of independent registered public accounting firm
To the Shareholders of the Fund and Board of Trustees
Wells Fargo Funds Trust:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund (the Fund), one of the funds constituting Wells Fargo Funds Trust, including the portfolio of investments, as of May 31, 2021, the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the financial statements) and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of May 31, 2021, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Fund in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and financial highlights, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. Such procedures also included confirmation of securities owned as of May 31, 2021, by correspondence with the transfer agent. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and financial highlights. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have not been able to determine the specific year that we began serving as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies; however, we are aware that we have served as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies since at least 1955.
Boston, Massachusetts
July 28, 2021

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund  |  25


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Common stocks:  96.91%          
Communication services:  1.54%          
Entertainment: 1.54%           
Lions Gate Entertainment Class B          466,678 $     8,110,864
Zynga Incorporated Class A        1,206,308    13,076,379
             21,187,243
Consumer discretionary:  9.32%          
Auto components: 0.77%           
Fox Factory Holding Corporation           68,249    10,611,355
Hotels, restaurants & leisure: 1.93%           
International Game Technology          730,126    17,712,857
Papa John's International Incorporated           94,893     8,915,197
             26,628,054
Household durables: 0.87%           
Skyline Champion Corporation          236,816    11,994,730
Leisure products: 1.64%           
Callaway Golf Company          254,320     9,389,494
Hayward Holdings Incorporated †«          519,010    13,219,185
             22,608,679
Multiline retail: 0.75%           
Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings Incorporated          119,490    10,328,716
Specialty retail: 3.36%           
American Eagle Outfitters Incorporated          297,960    10,556,723
Burlington Stores Incorporated           34,760    11,240,341
Five Below Incorporated       45,724 8,418,703
Monro Muffler Brake Incorporated       102,714 6,403,191
Sleep Number Corporation       86,918 9,690,488
          46,309,446
Consumer staples:  1.99%          
Food & staples retailing: 1.03%           
Performance Food Group Company       282,477 14,160,572
Personal products: 0.96%           
e.l.f. Beauty Incorporated       471,947 13,214,516
Financials:  9.55%          
Banks: 0.89%           
Triumph Bancorp Incorporated       146,923 12,304,801
Capital markets: 4.29%           
Evercore Partners Incorporated Class A       93,543 13,644,182
Focus Financial Partners Class A       272,118 13,793,661
Open Lending Corporation Class A       173,769 6,704,008
Stifel Financial Corporation       216,559 15,003,208
VIRTU Financial Incorporated Class A       326,619 9,945,549
          59,090,608
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

26  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Insurance: 3.41%           
Argo Group International Holdings Limited          154,642 $     8,294,997
BRP Group Incorporated Class A          413,921    10,174,178
Goosehead Insurance Incorporated Class A          155,647    13,987,996
Palomar Holdings Incorporated          199,144    14,537,512
             46,994,683
Thrifts & mortgage finance: 0.96%           
Essent Group Limited          275,543    13,181,977
Health care:  26.97%          
Biotechnology: 4.48%           
Achilles Therapeutics PL ADR †«          214,873     2,713,846
Amicus Therapeutics Incorporated          485,974     4,500,119
Arena Pharmaceuticals Incorporated           93,667     5,723,990
Black Diamond Therapeutics Incorporated          117,490     1,541,469
Blueprint Medicines Corporation           96,554     8,820,208
Constellation Pharmaceutical          177,575     3,517,761
Cytokinetics Incorporated          284,827     6,217,773
Emergent BioSolutions Incorporated           99,545     6,037,404
Immunovant Incorporated          196,743     2,982,624
Ionis Pharmaceuticals Incorporated          109,355     4,073,474
Iovance Biotherapeutics Incorporated          166,691     3,095,452
Mirati Therapeutics Incorporated           43,932     6,947,846
Turning Point Therapeutics Incorporated           83,176     5,504,588
             61,676,554
Health care equipment & supplies: 6.55%           
Atricure Incorporated       198,559 14,838,314
Axonics Modulation Technologies Incorporated       265,526 15,318,195
Cardiovascular Systems Incorporated       240,584 9,428,487
Cerus Corporation       1,031,634 5,973,161
Conmed Corporation       103,637 14,269,779
Novocure Limited       37,291 7,607,364
Silk Road Medical Incorporated       260,178 12,639,447
Tactile Systems Technology Class I       190,007 10,216,676
          90,291,423
Health care providers & services: 4.70%           
AMN Healthcare Services Incorporated       145,664 12,920,397
HealthEquity Incorporated       127,876 10,629,053
Oak Street Health Incorporated       190,065 11,478,025
PetIQ Incorporated       277,739 11,415,073
Privia Health Group Incorporated       287,129 9,397,732
U.S. Physical Therapy Incorporated       76,513 8,903,049
          64,743,329
Health care technology: 4.17%           
Allscripts Healthcare Solutions Incorporated       621,449 10,806,998
Evolent Health Incorporated Class A       474,778 9,224,937
Omnicell Incorporated       121,054 16,826,506
OptimizeRx Corporation       150,575 7,396,244
Phreesia Incorporated       169,689 8,399,606
Tabula Rasa Healthcare Incorporated †«       110,655 4,781,403
          57,435,694
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio  |  27


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Life sciences tools & services: 5.72%           
Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation          198,705 $     7,513,036
Avantor Incorporated          567,676    18,250,783
ICON plc ADR           72,526    16,228,418
PRA Health Sciences Incorporated           79,001    13,502,851
Syneos Health Incorporated          265,989    23,380,433
             78,875,521
Pharmaceuticals: 1.35%           
Axsome Therapeutics Incorporated           93,992     5,706,254
Pacira Pharmaceuticals Incorporated          124,456     7,550,746
Theravance Biopharma Incorporated          310,369     5,363,176
             18,620,176
Industrials:  19.70%          
Aerospace & defense: 1.40%           
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions Incorporated          308,262     7,709,633
Mercury Systems Incorporated          177,218    11,598,918
             19,308,551
Airlines: 0.79%           
Sun Country Airlines Holding          291,569    10,846,367
Building products: 3.85%           
A.O. Smith Corporation           72,768     5,171,622
Advanced Drainage Systems Incorporated          109,623    12,433,441
Masonite International Corporation          119,205    14,250,958
PGT Incorporated          344,148     8,314,616
The AZEK Company Incorporated       295,742 12,873,649
          53,044,286
Commercial services & supplies: 1.07%           
IAA Incorporated       148,974 8,487,049
KAR Auction Services Incorporated       352,566 6,325,034
          14,812,083
Construction & engineering: 0.47%           
Dycom Industries Incorporated       86,726 6,497,512
Electrical equipment: 1.63%           
Atkore International Incorporated       125,382 9,679,490
Generac Holdings Incorporated       39,054 12,837,831
          22,517,321
Machinery: 3.31%           
Chart Industries Incorporated       94,723 13,823,875
SPX Corporation       258,752 16,205,638
Wabash National Corporation       446,225 7,117,289
Woodward Incorporated       66,406 8,445,515
          45,592,317
Professional services: 5.14%           
ASGN Incorporated       193,448 19,942,554
Clarivate plc       436,329 13,107,323
FTI Consulting Incorporated       68,506 9,423,000
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

28  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Professional services (continued)          
ICF International Incorporated          166,083 $    14,598,696
KBR Incorporated          336,561    13,711,495
             70,783,068
Road & rail: 1.30%           
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Incorporated          189,720     9,055,336
Schneider National Incorporated Class B          362,058     8,866,800
             17,922,136
Trading companies & distributors: 0.74%           
Boise Cascade Company          154,931    10,223,897
Information technology:  23.16%          
Communications equipment: 2.03%           
Ciena Corporation          323,075    17,080,975
Lumentum Holdings Incorporated          133,963    10,900,569
             27,981,544
Electronic equipment, instruments & components: 1.50%           
Itron Incorporated          114,609    10,927,968
Par Technology Corporation          146,041     9,778,905
             20,706,873
IT services: 3.52%           
Black Knight Incorporated          188,276    13,817,576
EVO Payments Incorporated Class A          334,493     9,579,880
LiveRamp Holdings Incorporated          227,581    11,433,669
Verra Mobility Corporation          385,066     5,487,191
WEX Incorporated       41,652 8,160,043
          48,478,359
Semiconductors & semiconductor equipment: 3.59%           
CMC Materials Incorporated       55,618 8,583,526
FormFactor Incorporated       178,261 6,283,700
Onto Innovation Incorporated       150,251 10,783,514
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation ADR       171,573 11,318,671
Teradyne Incorporated       94,453 12,500,855
          49,470,266
Software: 12.52%           
Box Incorporated Class A       610,887 14,239,776
Cloudera Incorporated       639,378 8,222,401
Cornerstone OnDemand Incorporated       216,265 9,509,172
CyberArk Software Limited       97,850 12,381,939
Doubleverify Holdings Incorporated       145,938 5,383,653
Mimecast Limited       220,612 11,028,394
Nuance Communications Incorporated       383,323 20,277,787
Pagerduty Incorporated       341,711 13,890,552
PTC Incorporated       174,503 23,407,832
Sprout Social Incorporated Class A       142,177 9,869,927
SS&C Technologies Holdings Incorporated       245,646 18,145,870
Telos Corporation       188,448 6,196,170
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio  |  29


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Software (continued)          
Zendesk Incorporated           74,283 $    10,151,515
Zuora Incorporated          639,370     9,891,054
            172,596,042
Materials:  2.90%          
Chemicals: 2.16%           
Element Solutions Incorporated          804,038    18,806,449
Orion Engineered Carbons SA          546,041    11,051,870
             29,858,319
Metals & mining: 0.74%           
Steel Dynamics Incorporated          162,730    10,159,234
Real estate:  1.78%          
Equity REITs: 1.34%           
QTS Realty Trust Incorporated Class A          140,721     8,918,897
Ryman Hospitality Properties Incorporated          127,133     9,523,533
             18,442,430
Real estate management & development: 0.44%           
Compass Incorporated Class A †«          456,486     6,135,172
Total Common stocks (Cost $746,109,202)         1,335,633,854
    
      Expiration
date
   
Rights:  0.00%          
Communication services:  0.00%          
Media:  0.00%          
Media General Incorporated ♦†     12-31-2021    347,897             0
Total Rights (Cost $0)                     0
    
    Yield      
Short-term investments:  4.51%          
Investment companies:  4.51%          
Securities Lending Cash Investments LLC ♠∩∞   0.03%   21,935,055    21,935,055
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class ♠∞   0.03   40,275,255    40,275,255
Total Short-term investments (Cost $62,210,310)            62,210,310
Total investments in securities (Cost $808,319,512) 101.42%       1,397,844,164
Other assets and liabilities, net (1.42)         (19,553,244)
Total net assets 100.00%       $1,378,290,920
    
Non-income-earning security
The security is fair valued in accordance with procedures approved by the Board of Trustees.
« All or a portion of this security is on loan.
The issuer is an affiliate of the Portfolio as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The investment is a non-registered investment company purchased with cash collateral received from securities on loan.
The rate represents the 7-day annualized yield at period end.
    
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

30  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021
Abbreviations:
ADR American depositary receipt
REIT Real estate investment trust
Investments in affiliates
An affiliated investment is an investment in which the Portfolio owns at least 5% of the outstanding voting shares of the issuer or as a result of other relationships, such as the Portfolio and the issuer having the same adviser or investment manager. Transactions with issuers that were either affiliates of the Portfolio at the beginning of the period or the end of the period were as follows:
  Value,
beginning of
period
Purchases Sales
proceeds
Net
realized
gains
(losses)
  Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses)
  Value,
end of
period
  % of
net
assets
Shares,
end
of period
Income
from
affiliated
securities
Short-term investments                        
Investment companies                        
Securities Lending Cash Investments LLC $ 0 $168,640,715 $(146,705,660) $0   $0   $ 21,935,055     21,935,055 $ 7,586#
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class 39,427,080 679,360,500 (678,512,325) 0   0   40,275,255     40,275,255 17,281
        $0   $0   $62,210,310   4.51%   $24,867
    
# Amount shown represents income before fees and rebates.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio  |  31


Statement of assets and liabilities—May 31, 2021
   
Assets  
Investments in unaffiliated securities (including $21,640,172 of securities loaned), at value (cost $746,109,202)

$ 1,335,633,854
Investments in affiliated securites, at value (cost $62,210,310)

62,210,310
Receivable for investments sold

3,252,803
Receivable for dividends

435,628
Receivable for securities lending income, net

21,431
Prepaid expenses and other assets

53,797
Total assets

1,401,607,823
Liabilities  
Payable upon receipt of securities loaned

21,935,055
Advisory fee payable

912,918
Payable for investments purchased

468,930
Total liabilities

23,316,903
Total net assets

$1,378,290,920
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

32  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio


Statement of operations—year ended May 31, 2021
   
Investment income  
Dividends

$ 6,282,433
Income from affiliated securities

127,217
Total investment income

6,409,650
Expenses  
Advisory fee

11,109,597
Custody and accounting fees

94,523
Professional fees

46,381
Interest holder report expenses

10,910
Trustees’ fees and expenses

19,191
Other fees and expenses

49,510
Total expenses

11,330,112
Net investment loss

(4,920,462)
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments  
Net realized gains on investments

383,642,418
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

248,333,561
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

631,975,979
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

$627,055,517
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio  |  33


Statement of changes in net assets
     
  Year ended
May 31, 2021
Year ended
May 31, 2020
Operations    
Net investment loss

$ (4,920,462) $ (2,562,794)
Net realized gains on investments

383,642,418 108,634,846
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

248,333,561 (27,501,699)
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

627,055,517 78,570,353
Capital transactions    
Transactions in investors’ beneficial interests    
Contributions

27,183,074 51,028,631
Withdrawals

(661,328,291) (551,302,982)
Net decrease in net assets resulting from capital transactions

(634,145,217) (500,274,351)
Total decrease in net assets

(7,089,700) (421,703,998)
Net assets    
Beginning of period

1,385,380,620 1,807,084,618
End of period

$1,378,290,920 $1,385,380,620
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

34  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio


Financial highlights
  Year ended May 31
  2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Total return

54.64% 4.08% (5.64)% 28.74% 18.15%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)          
Gross expenses

0.79% 0.78% 0.78% 0.78% 0.79%
Net expenses

0.79% 0.78% 0.78% 0.78% 0.79%
Net investment loss

(0.34)% (0.16)% (0.09)% (0.18)% (0.14)%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate

44% 41% 54% 37% 82%
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio  |  35


Notes to financial statements
1. ORGANIZATION
Wells Fargo Master Trust (the "Trust"), a Delaware statutory trust organized on March 10, 1999, is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). As an investment company, the Trust follows the accounting and reporting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, Financial Services – Investment Companies. These financial statements report on the Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio (the "Portfolio") which is a diversified series of the Trust.
Interests in the Portfolio are available solely through private placement transactions that do not involve any "public offering" within the meaning of Section 4(2) of the Investment Company Act of 1933.
On February 23, 2021, Wells Fargo & Company announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management ("WFAM") to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. WFAM is the trade name used by the asset management businesses of Wells Fargo & Company and includes Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the adviser to the Portfolio, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, both registered investment advisers providing sub-advisory services to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Portfolio's principal underwriter. As part of the transaction, Wells Fargo & Company will own a 9.9% equity interest and will continue to serve as an important client and distribution partner.
Consummation of the transaction will result in the automatic termination of the Portfolio's advisory agreement and subadvisory agreement. The Portfolio's Board of Trustees approved a new advisory and new subadvisory agreement and approved submitting the agreements to the Portfolio’s interest holders for approval at a special meeting of interest holders expected to be held on August 16, 2021. Interest holders of record of the Portfolio at the close of business on May 28, 2021 are entitled to vote at the meeting. If interest holders approve the new agreements, they would take effect upon the closing of the transaction. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following significant accounting policies, which are consistently followed in the preparation of the financial statements of the Portfolio, are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Securities valuation
All investments are valued each business day as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4 p.m. Eastern Time), although the Portfolio may deviate from this calculation time under unusual or unexpected circumstances.
Equity securities that are listed on a foreign or domestic exchange or market are valued at the official closing price or, if none, the last sales price. If no sale occurs on the principal exchange or market that day, a fair value price will be determined in accordance with the Portfolio’s Valuation Procedures.
Investments in registered open-end investment companies are valued at net asset value. Interests in non-registered investment companies that are redeemable at net asset value are fair valued normally at net asset value.
Investments which are not valued using any of the methods discussed above are valued at their fair value, as determined in good faith by the Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees has established a Valuation Committee comprised of the Trustees and has delegated to it the authority to take any actions regarding the valuation of portfolio securities that the Valuation Committee deems necessary or appropriate, including determining the fair value of portfolio securities, unless the determination has been delegated to the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee at Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC ("Funds Management"). The Board of Trustees retains the authority to make or ratify any valuation decisions or approve any changes to the Valuation Procedures as it deems appropriate. On a quarterly basis, the Board of Trustees receives reports on any valuation actions taken by the Valuation Committee or the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee which may include items for ratification.
Securities lending
The Portfolio may lend its securities from time to time in order to earn additional income in the form of fees or interest on securities received as collateral or the investment of any cash received as collateral. When securities are on loan, the Portfolio receives interest or dividends on those securities. Cash collateral received in connection with its securities lending transactions is invested in Securities Lending Cash Investments, LLC (the “Securities Lending Fund”). Investments in Securities Lending Fund

36  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio


Notes to financial statements
are valued at the evaluated bid price provided by an independent pricing service. Income earned from investment in the Securities Lending Fund (net of fees and rebates), if any, is included in income from affiliated securities on the Statement of Operations.
In a securities lending transaction, the net asset value of the Portfolio is affected by an increase or decrease in the value of the securities loaned and by an increase or decrease in the value of the instrument in which collateral is invested. The amount of securities lending activity undertaken by the Portfolio fluctuates from time to time. The Portfolio has the right under the lending agreement to recover the securities from the borrower on demand. In the event of default or bankruptcy by the borrower, the Portfolio may be prevented from recovering the loaned securities or gaining access to the collateral or may experience delays or costs in doing so. In such an event, the terms of the agreement allow the unaffiliated securities lending agent to use the collateral to purchase replacement securities on behalf of the Portfolio or pay the Portfolio the market value of the loaned securities. The Portfolio bears the risk of loss with respect to depreciation of its investment of the cash collateral.
Security transactions and income recognition
Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains or losses are recorded on the basis of identified cost.
Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date.
Federal and other taxes
The Portfolio is not required to pay federal income taxes on its net investment income and net capital gains as it is treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. All income, gains and losses of the Portfolio are deemed to have been “passed through” to the interest holders in proportion to their holdings of the Portfolio regardless of whether income and gains have been distributed by the Portfolio.
The Portfolio’s income tax returns and all financial records supporting those returns for the prior three fiscal years are subject to examination by the federal revenue authority. Management has analyzed the Portfolio’s tax positions taken on federal, state, and foreign tax returns for all open tax years and does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability.
As of May 31, 2021, the aggregate cost of all investments for federal income tax purposes was $827,099,368 and the unrealized gains (losses) consisted of:
Gross unrealized gains $609,113,977
Gross unrealized losses (38,369,181)
Net unrealized gains $570,744,796
3. FAIR VALUATION MEASUREMENTS
Fair value measurements of investments are determined within a framework that has established a fair value hierarchy based upon the various data inputs utilized in determining the value of the Portfolio’s investments. The three-level hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The Portfolio’s investments are classified within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The inputs are summarized into three broad levels as follows:
Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical securities
Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Portfolio’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs or methodologies used for valuing investments in securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio  |  37


Notes to financial statements
The following is a summary of the inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s assets and liabilities as of May 31, 2021:
  Quoted prices
(Level 1)
Other significant
observable inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
unobservable inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Assets        
Investments in:        
Common stocks        
Communication services $ 21,187,243 $0 $0 $ 21,187,243
Consumer discretionary 128,480,980 0 0 128,480,980
Consumer staples 27,375,088 0 0 27,375,088
Financials 131,572,069 0 0 131,572,069
Health care 371,642,697 0 0 371,642,697
Industrials 271,547,538 0 0 271,547,538
Information technology 319,233,084 0 0 319,233,084
Materials 40,017,553 0 0 40,017,553
Real estate 24,577,602 0 0 24,577,602
Rights        
Communication services 0 0 0 0
Short-term investments        
Investment companies 62,210,310 0 0 62,210,310
Total assets $1,397,844,164 $0 $0 $1,397,844,164
Additional sector, industry or geographic detail, if any, is included in the Portfolio of Investments.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the Portfolio did not have any transfers into/out of Level 3.
4. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
Advisory fee
The Trust has entered into an advisory contract with Funds Management, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company ("Wells Fargo"). The adviser is responsible for implementing investment policies and guidelines and for supervising the subadviser, who is responsible for day-to-day portfolio management of the Portfolio. Pursuant to the contract, Funds Management is entitled to receive an advisory fee at the following annual rate based on the Portfolio’s average daily net assets:
Average daily net assets Advisory fee
First $500 million 0.800%
Next $500 million 0.775
Next $1 billion 0.750
Next $1 billion 0.725
Next $1 billion 0.700
Over $4 billion 0.680
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the advisory fee was equivalent to an annual rate of 0.78% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets.
Funds Management has retained the services of a subadviser to provide daily portfolio management to the Portfolio. The fee for subadvisory services is borne by Funds Management. Peregrine Capital Management, LLC, which is not an affiliate of Funds Management, is the subadviser to the Portfolio and is entitled to receive a fee from Funds Management at an annual rate of 0.38% of the Fund's average daily net assets. Prior to June 1, 2020, Peregrine Capital Management, LLC received a fee at an annual rate which started at 0.50% and declined to 0.45% as the average daily net assets increased.

38  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio


Notes to financial statements
Interfund transactions
The Portfolio may purchase or sell portfolio investment securities to certain other Wells Fargo affiliates pursuant to Rule 17a-7 under the 1940 Act and under procedures adopted by the Board of Trustees. The procedures have been designed to ensure that these interfund transactions, which do not incur broker commissions, are effected at current market prices.
5. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS
Purchases and sales of investments, excluding U.S. government obligations (if any) and short-term securities, for the year ended May 31, 2021 were $606,284,719 and $1,247,934,107, respectively.
6. SECURITIES LENDING TRANSACTIONS
The Portfolio lends its securities through an unaffiliated securities lending agent and receives collateral in the form of cash or securities with a value at least equal to the value of the securities on loan. The value of the loaned securities is determined at the close of each business day and any increases or decreases in the required collateral are exchanged between the Portfolio and the counterparty on the next business day. Cash collateral received is invested in the Securities Lending Fund which seeks to provide a positive return compared to the daily Federal Funds Open Rate by investing in high-quality, U.S. dollar-denominated short-term money market instruments and is exempt from registration under Section 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act. Securities Lending Fund is managed by Funds Management and is subadvised by Wells Capital Management Incorporated ("WellsCap"), an affiliate of Funds Management and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo. Funds Management receives an advisory fee starting at 0.05% and declining to 0.01% as the average daily net assets of the Securities Lending Fund increase. All of the fees received by Funds Management are paid to WellsCap for its services as subadviser.
In the event of counterparty default or the failure of a borrower to return a loaned security, the Portfolio has the right to use the collateral to offset any losses incurred. As of May 31, 2021, the Portfolio had securities lending transactions with the following counterparties which are subject to offset:
Counterparty Value of
securities on
loan
Collateral
received1
Net amount
Barclays Capital Incorporated $13,079,583 $(13,079,583) $ 0
BNP Paribas Securities Corporation 3,551,862 (3,514,050) 37,812
Citigroup Global Markets Incorporated 4,020,786 (4,020,786) 0
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC 966,336 (966,336) 0
Nomura Securities International Incorporated 21,605 (21,375) 230
1 Collateral received within this table is limited to the collateral for the net transaction with the counterparty.
7. BANK BORROWINGS
The Trust, along with Wells Fargo Variable Trust and Wells Fargo Funds Trust (excluding the money market funds), are parties to a $350,000,000 revolving credit agreement whereby the Portfolio is permitted to use bank borrowings for temporary or emergency purposes, such as to fund interest holders withdrawal requests. Interest under the credit agreement is charged to the Portfolio based on a borrowing rate equal to the higher of the Federal Funds rate in effect on that day plus 1.25% or the overnight LIBOR rate in effect on that day plus 1.25%. In addition, an annual commitment fee equal to 0.25% of the unused balance is allocated to each participating fund.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, there were no borrowings by the Portfolio under the agreement.
8. CONCENTRATION RISKS
As of the end of the period, the Portfolio concentrated its portfolio of investments in the health care sector. A fund that invests a substantial portion of its assets in any sector may be more affected by changes in that sector than would be a fund whose investments are not heavily weighted in any sector.
9. INDEMNIFICATION
Under the Portfolio's organizational documents, the officers and Trustees have been granted certain indemnification rights against certain liabilities that may arise out of performance of their duties to the Portfolio. The Portfolio has entered into a separate agreement with each Trustee that converts indemnification rights currently existing under the Portfolio’s

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio  |  39


Notes to financial statements
organizational documents into contractual rights that cannot be changed in the future without the consent of the Trustee. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Portfolio may enter into contracts with service providers that contain a variety of indemnification clauses. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent on future claims that may be made against the Portfolio and, therefore, cannot be estimated.
10. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
In August 2018, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 updates the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Management has adopted this guidance which did not have a material impact on the financial statements.
11. CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization announced that it had made the assessment that coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) is a pandemic. The impacts of COVID-19 are affecting the entire global economy, individual companies and investment products, the funds, and the market in general. There is significant uncertainty around the extent and duration of business disruptions related to COVID-19 and the impacts may last for an extended period of time. COVID-19 has led to significant uncertainty and volatility in the financial markets.
12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
At a meeting held July 15, 2021, the Board of Trustees of the Wells Fargo Funds approved a change in the Portfolio's name to remove “Wells Fargo” from the Portfolio's name and replace with “Allspring”. The change is expected to go into effect on October 11, 2021.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) announced that it will be changing its company name to Allspring Global Investments upon the closing of the previously announced sale transaction of WFAM by Wells Fargo & Company to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. The new corporate name is expected to go into effect on the closing date of the transaction, which is anticipated to occur in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
Following the closing of the transaction, Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the Portfolio's investment adviser, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, each sub-advisers to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC will each be rebranded as Allspring.

40  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio


Report of independent registered public accounting firm
To the Interest Holders of the Portfolio and Board of Trustees
Wells Fargo Master Trust:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio (the Portfolio), one of the portfolios constituting Wells Fargo Master Trust, including the portfolio of investments, as of May 31, 2021, the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the financial statements) and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Portfolio as of May 31, 2021, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Portfolio in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and financial highlights, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. Such procedures also included confirmation of securities owned as of May 31, 2021, by correspondence with the custodian, transfer agent and brokers, or by other appropriate auditing procedures. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and financial highlights. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have not been able to determine the specific year that we began serving as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies; however, we are aware that we have served as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies since at least 1955.
Boston, Massachusetts
July 28, 2021

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio  |  41


Other information (unaudited)
TAX INFORMATION
For corporate shareholders, pursuant to Section 854 of the Internal Revenue Code, 9% of ordinary income dividends qualify for the corporate dividends-received deduction for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 852 of the Internal Revenue Code, $147,632,068 was designated as a 20% rate gain distribution for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 854 of the Internal Revenue Code, $4,541,406 of income dividends paid during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 has been designated as qualified dividend income (QDI).
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, $46,221,198 has been designated as short-term capital gain dividends for nonresident alien shareholders pursuant to Section 871 of the Internal Revenue Code.
PROXY VOTING INFORMATION
A description of the policies and procedures used to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-222-8222, visiting our website at wfam.com, or visiting the SEC website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the proxies related to portfolio securities were voted during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the website at wfam.com or by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS INFORMATION
The Fund and Portfolio file their complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year as an exhibit to their reports on Form N-PORT. Shareholders and Interest holders may view the filed Form N-PORT by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov.

42  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio


Other information (unaudited)
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS
Each of the Trustees and Officers listed in the table below acts in identical capacities for each fund in the Wells Fargo family of funds, which consists of 139 mutual funds comprising the Wells Fargo Funds Trust, Wells Fargo Variable Trust, Wells Fargo Master Trust and four closed-end funds (collectively the “Fund Complex”). This table should be read in conjunction with the Prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information1. The mailing address of each Trustee and Officer is 525 Market Street, 12th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105. Each Trustee and Officer serves an indefinite term, however, each Trustee serves such term until reaching the mandatory retirement age established by the Trustees.
Independent Trustees
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service*
Principal occupations during past five years or longer Current other
public company or
investment
company
directorships
William R. Ebsworth
(Born 1957)
Trustee,
since 2015
Retired. From 1984 to 2013, equities analyst, portfolio manager, research director and chief investment officer at Fidelity Management and Research Company in Boston, Tokyo, and Hong Kong, and retired in 2013 as Chief Investment Officer of Fidelity Strategic Advisers, Inc. where he led a team of investment professionals managing client assets. Prior thereto, Board member of Hong Kong Securities Clearing Co., Hong Kong Options Clearing Corp., the Thailand International Fund, Ltd., Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company, and Empire Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company. Audit Committee Chair and Investment Committee Chair of the Vincent Memorial Hospital Endowment (non-profit organization). Mr. Ebsworth is a CFA® charterholder. N/A
Jane A. Freeman
(Born 1953)
Trustee,
since 2015;
Chair Liaison,
since 2018
Retired. From 2012 to 2014 and 1999 to 2008, Chief Financial Officer of Scientific Learning Corporation. From 2008 to 2012, Ms. Freeman provided consulting services related to strategic business projects. Prior to 1999, Portfolio Manager at Rockefeller & Co. and Scudder, Stevens & Clark. Board member of the Harding Loevner Funds from 1996 to 2014, serving as both Lead Independent Director and chair of the Audit Committee. Board member of the Russell Exchange Traded Funds Trust from 2011 to 2012 and the chair of the Audit Committee. Ms. Freeman is also an inactive Chartered Financial Analyst. N/A
Isaiah Harris, Jr.
(Born 1952)
Trustee,
since 2009; Audit
Committee
Chair,
since 2019
Retired. Chairman of the Board of CIGNA Corporation since 2009, and Director since 2005. From 2003 to 2011, Director of Deluxe Corporation. Prior thereto, President and CEO of BellSouth Advertising and Publishing Corp. from 2005 to 2007, President and CEO of BellSouth Enterprises from 2004 to 2005 and President of BellSouth Consumer Services from 2000 to 2003. Emeritus member of the Iowa State University Foundation Board of Governors. Emeritus Member of the Advisory Board of Iowa State University School of Business. Advisory Board Member, Palm Harbor Academy (private school). Mr. Harris is a certified public accountant (inactive status). CIGNA Corporation
Judith M. Johnson
(Born 1949)
Trustee,
since 2008
Retired. Prior thereto, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund from 1996 to 2008. Ms. Johnson is an attorney, certified public accountant and a certified managerial accountant. N/A
David F. Larcker
(Born 1950)
Trustee,
since 2009
James Irvin Miller Professor of Accounting at the Graduate School of Business (Emeritus), Stanford University, Director of the Corporate Governance Research Initiative and Senior Faculty of The Rock Center for Corporate Governance since 2006. From 2005 to 2008, Professor of Accounting at the Graduate School of Business, Stanford University. Prior thereto, Ernst & Young Professor of Accounting at The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania from 1985 to 2005. N/A

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio  |  43


Other information (unaudited)
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service*
Principal occupations during past five years or longer Current other
public company or
investment
company
directorships
Olivia S. Mitchell
(Born 1953)
Trustee,
since 2006;
Nominating and
Governance
Committee Chair,
since 2018
International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans Professor, Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania since 1993. Director of Wharton’s Pension Research Council and Boettner Center on Pensions & Retirement Research, and Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. Previously, Cornell University Professor from 1978 to 1993. N/A
Timothy J. Penny
(Born 1951)
Trustee,
since 1996;
Chair,
since 2018
President and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Minnesota Initiative Foundation, a non-profit organization, since 2007. Member of the Board of Trustees of NorthStar Education Finance, Inc., a non-profit organization, since 2007. N/A
James G. Polisson
(Born 1959)
Trustee,
since 2018
Retired. Chief Marketing Officer, Source (ETF) UK Services, Ltd, from 2015 to 2017. From 2012 to 2015, Principal of The Polisson Group, LLC, a management consulting, corporate advisory and principal investing company. Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director at Russell Investments, Global Exchange Traded Funds from 2010 to 2012. Managing Director of Barclays Global Investors from 1998 to 2010 and Global Chief Marketing Officer for iShares and Barclays Global Investors from 2000 to 2010. Trustee of the San Francisco Mechanics’ Institute, a non-profit organization, from 2013 to 2015. Board member of the Russell Exchange Traded Fund Trust from 2011 to 2012. Director of Barclays Global Investors Holdings Deutschland GmbH from 2006 to 2009. Mr. Polisson is an attorney and has a retired status with the Massachusetts and District of Columbia Bar Associations. N/A
Pamela Wheelock
(Born 1959)
Trustee,
since January
2020; previously
Trustee from
January 2018 to
July 2019
Board member of the Destination Medical Center Economic Development Agency, Rochester, Minnesota since 2019. Interim President of the McKnight Foundation from January to September 2020. Acting Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Human Services, July 2019 through September 2019. Human Services Manager (part-time), Minnesota Department of Human Services, October 2019 through December 2019. Chief Operating Officer, Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity from 2017 to 2019. Vice President of University Services, University of Minnesota from 2012 to 2016. Prior thereto, on the Board of Directors, Governance Committee and Finance Committee for the Minnesota Philanthropy Partners (Saint Paul Foundation) from 2012 to 2018, Interim Chief Executive Officer of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota from 2011 to 2012, Chairman of the Board from 2009 to 2012 and Board Director from 2003 to 2015. Vice President, Leadership and Community Engagement, Bush Foundation, Saint Paul, Minnesota (a private foundation) from 2009 to 2011. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Minnesota Sports and Entertainment from 2004 to 2009 and Senior Vice President from 2002 to 2004. Executive Vice President of the Minnesota Wild Foundation from 2004 to 2008. Commissioner of Finance, State of Minnesota, from 1999 to 2002. Currently Board Chair of the Minnesota Wild Foundation since 2010. N/A
*  Length of service dates reflect the Trustee’s commencement of service with the Trust’s predecessor entities, where applicable.

44  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio


Other information (unaudited)
Officers
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service
Principal occupations during past five years or longer
Andrew Owen
(Born 1960)
President,
since 2017
Executive Vice President of Wells Fargo & Company and Head of Affiliated Managers, Wells Fargo Asset Management, since 2014. In addition, Mr. Owen is currently President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC since 2017. Prior thereto, Executive Vice President responsible for marketing, investments and product development for Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, from 2009 to 2014.
Jeremy DePalma
(Born 1974)
Treasurer,
since 2012
(for certain funds in
the Fund Complex);
since 2021 (for
the remaining funds in the
Fund Complex)
Senior Vice President of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC since 2009. Senior Vice President of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC from 2008 to 2010 and head of the Fund Reporting and Control Team within Fund Administration from 2005 to 2010.
Michelle Rhee
(Born 1966)
Chief Legal Officer,
since 2019
Secretary of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC and Chief Legal Counsel of Wells Fargo Asset Management since 2018. Deputy General Counsel of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. since 2020 and Assistant General Counsel of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. from 2018 to 2020. Associate General Counsel and Managing Director of Bank of America Corporation from 2004 to 2018.
Catherine Kennedy
(Born 1969)
Secretary,
since 2019
Vice President of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC and Senior Counsel of the Wells Fargo Legal Department since 2010. Vice President and Senior Counsel of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC from 1998 to 2010.
Michael H. Whitaker
(Born 1967)
Chief Compliance Officer,
since 2016
Chief Compliance Officer of Wells Fargo Asset Management since 2016. Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer for Fidelity Investments from 2007 to 2016.
1  The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about the Trustees and is available, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-222-8222 or by visiting the website at wfam.com.

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio  |  45


Other information (unaudited)
LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
In accordance with Rule 22e-4 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Liquidity Rule”), Wells Fargo Funds Trust and Wells Fargo Master Trust (each a “Trust”) has adopted and implemented a liquidity risk management program (the “Program”) on behalf of each of its series, including the Fund and the Portfolio, which is reasonably designed to assess and manage the Fund’s or the Portfolio’s liquidity risk. “Liquidity risk” is defined under the Liquidity Rule as the risk that the Fund or Portfolio is unable to meet redemption requests without significantly diluting remaining investors’ interests in the Fund or Portfolio. Each Trust’s Board of Trustees (each a “Board”) previously approved the designation of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”), the Fund’s investment manager and the Portfolio’s investment adviser, as the administrator of the Program, and Funds Management has established a Liquidity Risk Management Council (the “Council”) composed of personnel from multiple departments within Funds Management and its affiliates to assist Funds Management in the implementation and on-going administration of the Program.
The Program is comprised of various components designed to support the assessment and/or management of liquidity risk, including: (1) the periodic assessment (no less frequently than annually) of certain factors that influence the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s liquidity risk; (2) the periodic classification (no less frequently than monthly) of the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s investments into one of four liquidity categories that reflect an estimate of their liquidity under current market conditions; (3) a 15% limit on the acquisition of “illiquid investments” (as defined under the Liquidity Rule); (4) to the extent the Fund or the Portfolio does not invest primarily in “highly liquid investments” (as defined under the Liquidity Rule), the determination of a minimum percentage of the Fund’s or the Portfolio’s assets that generally will be invested in highly liquid investments (an “HLIM”); (5) if the Fund or the Portfolio has established an HLIM, the periodic review (no less frequently than annually) of the HLIM and the adoption of policies and procedures for responding to a shortfall of the Fund’s or the Portfolio’s “highly liquid investments” below its HLIM; and (6) periodic reporting to the Board.
At a meeting of the Board held on May 17-19, 2021, the Board received and reviewed a written report (the “Report”) from Funds Management that addressed the operation of the Program and assessed its adequacy and effectiveness for the period from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 (the “Reporting Period”). Among other things, the Report discussed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on liquidity and management of liquidity risk during the Reporting Period, including during the stressed market conditions caused by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. No significant liquidity events impacting the Fund or the Portfolio were noted in the Report. As applicable to the Fund and the Portfolio, there were no material changes to the Program during the Reporting Period.
Funds Management concluded in the Report that the Program is operating effectively to assess and manage the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s liquidity risk, and that the Program has been and continues to be adequately and effectively implemented to monitor and, as applicable, respond to the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s liquidity developments.
There can be no assurance that the Program will achieve its objectives under all circumstances in the future. Please refer to the Fund’s prospectus for more information regarding the Fund’s exposure to liquidity risk and other risks to which an investment in the Fund may be subject.

46  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio


Board considerations (unaudited)
BOARD CONSIDERATION OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, ADVISORY AND SUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENTS:
Board Considerations – Current Agreements
Under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Board of Trustees (each, a “Board” and collectively, the “Boards”) of each of Wells Fargo Funds Trust (“Funds Trust”) and Wells Fargo Master Trust (“Master Trust”, and collectively, the “Trusts”) must determine annually whether to approve the continuation of the Trusts’ investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements, as applicable. In this regard, at a Board meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Meeting”), the Funds Trust Board, all the members of which have no direct or indirect interest in the investment management agreement and are not “interested persons” of the Trusts, as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), reviewed and approved for Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund (the “Gateway Fund”) an investment management agreement (the “Gateway Fund Management Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”).
At the Meeting, the Master Trust Board, all the members of which have no direct or indirect interest in the investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements and are Independent Trustees, reviewed and approved: (i) an investment advisory agreement (the “Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement”) with Funds Management for Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio, a portfolio of Master Trust (the “Master Portfolio”); and (ii) an investment sub-advisory agreement (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Peregrine Capital Management, LLC (the “Sub-Adviser”) for the Master Portfolio.
The Gateway Fund and the Master Portfolio are collectively referred to as the “Funds.” The Gateway Fund Management Agreement, the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement are collectively referred to as the “Advisory Agreements.”
The Gateway Fund is a gateway feeder fund that invest substantially all of its assets in the Master Portfolio. The Master Portfolio has a substantially similar investment objective and substantially similar investment strategies to the Gateway Fund. Information provided to the Boards regarding the Gateway Fund is also applicable to the Master Portfolio, as relevant.
The Boards noted that Wells Fargo & Company (“Wells Fargo”) recently announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”), which includes Funds Management, to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. and/or their affiliates (the “Transaction”). The Boards further noted that the Transaction would result in a change-of-control of Funds Management, which would be considered to be an assignment that would result in the termination of the Advisory Agreements. In light of the Transaction, each Board separately considered for approval a new investment management agreement with Funds Management and the Master Trust Board, with respect to the Master Portfolio, a new sub-advisory agreement with the Sub-Adviser (collectively, the “New Agreements”) that would replace the Advisory Agreements upon consummation of the Transaction, subject to approval of each respective New Agreement by each Fund’s shareholders. The Boards also considered for approval interim agreements to go into effect in the event shareholders do not approve the New Agreements before the Transaction is completed. The interim agreements would allow the Manager and the Sub-Adviser, as applicable, to continue providing services to the Funds while the Funds continue to seek shareholder approval of the New Agreements. The Boards noted that the terms of the interim agreements would be identical to those of the current Advisory Agreements, except for the term and certain escrow provisions.
At the Meeting, the Boards considered the factors and reached the conclusions described below relating to the selection of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser and the approval of the Advisory Agreements. Prior to the Meeting, including at Board meetings held in April and May 2021, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with representatives of Funds Management about these matters. Also, the Boards have adopted a team-based approach, with each team consisting of a sub-set of Trustees, to assist the full Boards in the discharge of their duties in reviewing investment performance and other matters throughout the year. The Independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Advisory Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately.
In providing information to the Boards, Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser were guided by a detailed set of requests for information submitted to them by independent legal counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees at the start of the Boards’ annual contract renewal process earlier in 2021. In considering and approving the Advisory Agreements, the Trustees considered the information they believed relevant, including but not limited to the information discussed below. The Boards considered not only the specific information presented in connection with the Meeting, but also the knowledge gained over time through interaction with Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser about various topics. In this regard, the Boards reviewed reports of Funds Management at each of their quarterly meetings, which included, among other things, portfolio reviews and investment performance reports. In addition, the Boards and the teams mentioned above confer with portfolio managers at various times throughout the year. The Boards did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each individual Trustee may have attributed different weights to various factors.

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund  |  47


Board considerations (unaudited)
After its deliberations, the Funds Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Gateway Fund Management Agreement for a one-year term. Additionally, after its deliberations, the Master Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement, each for a one-year term. The Boards considered the approval of the Advisory Agreements for the Funds as part of their consideration of agreements for funds across the complex, but their approvals were made on a fund-by-fund basis. The following summarizes a number of important, but not necessarily all, factors considered by the Boards in support of their approvals.
Nature, extent and quality of services
The Boards received and considered various information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser under the Advisory Agreements. This information included a description of the investment advisory services and Fund-level administrative services, as well as, among other things, a summary of the background and experience of senior management of WFAM, of which Funds Management is a part, and a summary of investments made in the business of WFAM. The Boards also received a description of Funds Management’s and the Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans, including a summary of the performance of such plans and any changes thereto during the COVID-19 pandemic, and of their approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity. The Boards also received and reviewed information about Funds Management’s role as administrator of the Funds’ liquidity risk management program, Funds Management’s approach to risk management, and Funds Management’s intermediary and vendor oversight program.
The Boards also considered the qualifications, background, tenure and responsibilities of each of the portfolio managers primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the Funds. The Boards evaluated the ability of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser to attract and retain qualified investment professionals, including research, advisory and supervisory personnel.
The Boards further considered the compliance programs and compliance records of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser. In addition, the Boards took into account the full range of services provided to the Funds by Funds Management and its affiliates. The Boards also considered information about retention and back-up arrangements that have been put into place with respect to key personnel of WFAM in connection with the anticipated Transaction, noting that WFAM provided assurances that the announcement and eventual culmination of the Transaction is not expected to result in any diminution in the nature or quality of services provided to the Funds.
Fund investment performance and expenses
The Boards considered the investment performance results for each of the Funds over various time periods ended December 31, 2020. The Boards considered these results in comparison to the investment performance of funds in a universe that was determined by Broadridge Inc. (“Broadridge”) to be similar to the Gateway Fund (the “Universe”), and in comparison to the Gateway Fund’s benchmark index and to other comparative data. Broadridge is an independent provider of investment company data. The Boards received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the performance Universe. The Funds Trust Board noted that the investment performance of the Gateway Fund (Administrator Class) was in range of the average investment performance of its Universe for ten-year period ended December 31, 2020, and lower than the average investment performance of its Universe for one-, three- and five- year periods ended December 31, 2020. The Funds Trust Board also noted that the investment performance of the Gateway Fund was in range of its benchmark, the Russell 2000® Growth Index, for the three- and ten-year periods ended December 31, 2020, and lower than the investment performance of its benchmark index for the one- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2020.
The Master Trust Board took note of the investment performance of the Master Portfolio in the context of reviewing the investment performance of the Gateway Fund.
The Funds Trust Board received information concerning, and discussed factors contributing to, the underperformance of the Gateway Fund relative to the Universe and benchmark for the periods identified above. The Funds Trust Board took note of the explanations for the relative underperformance during these periods, including with respect to investment decisions and market factors that affected the Gateway Fund’s investment performance.
The Funds Trust Board also received and considered information regarding the Gateway Fund’s net operating expense ratios, which include fees and expenses of the Master Portfolio, and their various components, including actual management fees assessed at the Gateway Fund and Master Portfolio levels, custodian and other non-management fees, and Rule 12b-1 and non-Rule 12b-1 shareholder service fees. The Funds Trust Board considered these ratios in comparison to the median ratios of funds in class-specific expense groups that were determined by Broadridge to be similar to the Gateway Fund (the “Groups”). The Funds Trust Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the expense Groups and an explanation of how funds comprising expense groups and their expense ratios may vary from year-to-year. Based on the

48  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
Broadridge reports, the Funds Trust Board noted that the net operating expense ratios of the Gateway Fund were lower than, equal to or in range of the median net operating expense ratios of its expense Groups for each share class.
With respect to the Master Portfolio, the Master Trust Board reviewed the fee rates that are payable to Funds Management for investment advisory services (as discussed below), which are the only fees charged at the Master Portfolio level, relative to a corresponding expense Group.
The Boards took into account the Funds’ investment performance and expense information provided to them among the factors considered in deciding to re-approve the Advisory Agreements.
Investment management, advisory and sub-advisory fee rates
The Funds Trust Board noted that Funds Management receives no advisory fees from the Gateway Fund as long as the Gateway Fund continues to invest all (or substantially all) of its assets in a single master portfolio. If the Gateway Fund were to change its investment structure so that it began investing in two or more master portfolios (a fund-of-funds), Funds Management would be entitled to receive an annual fee of 0.25% of the Gateway Fund’s average daily net assets for providing investment advisory services to the Gateway Fund, including allocating the Gateway Fund’s assets to the Master Portfolio.
The Funds Trust Board reviewed and considered the contractual fee rates that are payable by the Gateway Fund to Funds Management under the Gateway Fund Management Agreement for management services (other than investment advisory services), as well as the contractual fee rates payable by the Gateway Fund to Funds Management for class-level administrative services under a Class-Level Administration Agreement, which include, among other things, class-level transfer agency and sub-transfer agency costs (collectively, the “Management Rates”).
The Master Trust Board reviewed and considered the contractual investment advisory fee rate that is payable by the Master Portfolio to Funds Management for investment advisory services under the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement (the “Advisory Agreement Rate”). The Master Trust Board also reviewed and considered the contractual investment sub-advisory fee rate that is payable by Funds Management to the Sub-Adviser for investment sub-advisory services (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement Rate”).
Among other information reviewed by the Funds Trust Board was a comparison of the Gateway Fund’s Management Rate, which, for this purpose, includes the advisory fees paid at the Master Portfolio level, with the average contractual investment management fee rates of funds in the expense Groups at a common asset level as well as transfer agency costs of the funds in the expense Groups. The Funds Trust Board noted that the Management Rates of the Gateway Fund were in range of the sum of these average rates for the Gateway Fund’s expense Groups for the Institutional Class and Class R6, and higher than the sum of these average rates for the Gateway Fund’s expense Groups for Class A and the Administrator Class. The Board noted that the Fund was benefitting from advisory fee breakpoints through the Master Portfolio in which it invests.
The Master Trust Board reviewed a comparison of the Advisory Agreement Rate of the Master Portfolio with those of other funds in the Master Portfolio’s expense Group at a common asset level. The Master Trust Board noted that the Advisory Agreement Rate of the Master Portfolio was lower than the median rate for the Master Portfolio’s expense Group.
The Master Trust Board also received and considered information about the portions of the total management fees that were retained by Funds Management after payment of the fees to the Sub-Adviser for sub-advisory services. The Master Trust Board considered these amounts in comparison to the median amount retained by advisers to funds in a sub-advised expense universe that was determined by Broadridge to be similar to the Master Portfolio. In assessing the reasonableness of these amounts, the Master Trust Board received and evaluated information about the nature and extent of responsibilities retained and risks assumed by Funds Management and not delegated to or assumed by the Sub-Adviser, and about Funds Management’s on-going oversight services. The Master Trust Board also considered that the sub-advisory fees paid to the Sub-Adviser had been negotiated by Funds Management on an arm’s length basis.
The Boards also received and considered information about the nature and extent of services offered and fee rates charged by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser to other types of clients with investment strategies similar to those of the Funds. In this regard, the Boards received information about the significantly greater scope of services, and compliance, reporting and other legal burdens and risks of managing proprietary mutual funds compared with those associated with managing assets of other types of clients, including third-party sub-advised fund clients and non-mutual fund clients such as institutional separate accounts.
Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Funds Trust Board determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the Gateway Fund Management Agreement was reasonable, and the Master Trust Board determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and to the Sub-Adviser under the Sub-Advisory Agreement was reasonable.

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund  |  49


Board considerations (unaudited)
Profitability
The Boards received and considered information concerning the profitability of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo from providing services to the fund family as a whole.
Funds Management reported on the methodologies and estimates used in calculating profitability, including a description of the methodology used to allocate certain expenses. Among other things, the Boards noted that the levels of profitability reported on a fund-by-fund basis varied widely, depending on factors such as the size, type and age of fund. The Boards did not consider profitability with respect to the Sub-Adviser, as the sub-advisory fees paid to the Sub-Adviser had been negotiated by Funds Management on an arm’s-length basis.
Based on its review, the Boards did not deem the profits reported by Funds Management, WFAM or Wells Fargo from services provided to the Funds to be at a level that would prevent the Boards from approving the continuation of the Advisory Agreements.
Economies of scale
The Boards received and considered information about the potential for Funds Management to experience economies of scale in the provision of management services to the Funds, the difficulties of calculating economies of scale at an individual fund level, and the extent to which potential scale benefits are shared with shareholders of the Funds. The Boards noted the existence of breakpoints in the Master Portfolio’s advisory fee structure and the Gateway Fund’s management fee structure, which operate generally to reduce the Funds’ expense ratios as the Funds grow in size, and the size of the Master Portfolio and the Gateway Fund, respectively, in relation to such breakpoints. The Boards considered that, in addition to advisory fee and management fee breakpoints, Funds Management shares potential economies of scale from its management business in a variety of ways, including through fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangements, competitive management fee rates set at the outset without regard to breakpoints, and investments in the business intended to enhance services available to shareholders.
The Boards concluded that Funds Management’s arrangements with respect to each Fund, including contractual breakpoints, constituted a reasonable approach to sharing potential economies of scale with the Funds and their shareholders.
Other benefits to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser
The Boards received and considered information regarding potential “fall-out” or ancillary benefits received by Funds Management, the Sub-Adviser, and their affiliates as a result of their relationships with the Funds. Ancillary benefits could include, among others, benefits directly attributable to other relationships with the Funds and benefits potentially derived from an increase in Funds Management’s and the Sub-Adviser’s business as a result of their relationships with the Funds. The Boards noted that various affiliates of Funds Management may receive distribution-related fees, shareholder servicing payments and sub-transfer agency fees in respect of shares sold or held through them and services provided.
The Boards also reviewed information about soft dollar credits earned and utilized by the Sub-Adviser, fees earned by Funds Management and its affiliate from managing a private investment vehicle for the fund family’s securities lending collateral, and commissions earned by an affiliated broker from portfolio transactions.
Based on their consideration of the factors and information they deemed relevant, including those described here, the Boards did not find that any ancillary benefits received by Funds Management, the Sub-Adviser, and their affiliates were unreasonable.
Conclusion
At the Meeting, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Funds Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Gateway Fund Management Agreement for a one-year term. Additionally, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Master Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement, each for a one-year term.

50  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board Considerations - New Agreements
Overview of the Board evaluation process
At a meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Board Meeting”), the Board of Trustees of Wells Fargo Funds Trust (“Funds Trust”, and the series identified below, the “Funds”) approved the continuation of each Fund’s current Investment Management Agreement (the “Current Investment Management Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”) and the Board of Trustees of Wells Fargo Master Trust (“Master Trust”, and the series identified below in which each Fund invests substantially all of its assets, a “Master Portfolio”) approved the continuation of the current investment advisory agreement (the “Current Advisory Agreement”) with Funds Management, the current sub-advisory agreement with Wells Capital Management Incorporated (“Wells Capital”, and together with Funds Management, the “Advisers”), and the current sub-advisory agreements with Cooke & Bieler, L.P. (“C&B”) and Peregrine Capital Management, LLC (“Peregrine”, and together with C&B, the “Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers”)(collectively, the “Current Agreements”).
Funds Trust Master Trust
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio
Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio
Wells Fargo Index Fund Wells Fargo Index Portfolio
Wells Fargo Real Return Fund Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio
Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio
Each Trustee on the Funds Trust Board and the Master Trust Board of Trustees (collectively, the “Boards”) is not an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) of the Funds or the Master Portfolios (collectively, the “Independent Trustees”). The process followed by the Boards in considering and approving the continuation of each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s Current Agreements is referred to herein as the “2021 Annual Approval Process.”
As noted above, the closing of the sale of Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”) to a holding company (“NewCo”) affiliated with private funds of GTCR LLC (“GTCR”) and of Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. (“Reverence Capital”, and such transaction, the “Transaction”) will result in a change of control of Funds Management and Wells Capital, which will be considered to be an “assignment” of each Fund’s Current Agreements under the 1940 Act that will result in the automatic termination of each Fund’s Current Agreements. In light of the expected termination of each Fund’s Current Agreements upon the closing, at the Board Meeting the Boards also approved, as applicable: (i) for Funds Trust, a new investment management agreement with Funds Management (the “New Investment Management Agreement”); (ii) for the Master Trust, a new advisory agreement with Funds Management (the “New Advisory Agreement”); (iii) for Master Trust, a new sub-advisory agreement (the “New WellsCap Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Wells Capital for Emerging Growth Portfolio, Index Portfolio, Small Company Value Portfolio, Core Bond Portfolio and Real Return Portfolio; (iv) for Master Trust, a new sub-advisory agreement (the “New Peregrine Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Peregrine for Small Company Growth Portfolio; and (v) for Master Trust, a new sub-advisory agreement (the “New C&B Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with C&B for the C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio, each of which is intended to go into effect upon the closing (the “New Agreements”). The process followed by the Boards in reviewing and approving the New Agreements is referred to herein as the “New Agreement Approval Process.”
At a series of meetings held in April and May 2021 (collectively, “April and May 2021 Meetings”) and at the Board Meeting, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital about the New Agreements and related matters. The Boards reviewed and discussed information furnished by Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital that the Boards considered reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the New Agreements and the services to be provided. At these meetings, senior representatives from Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital made presentations to, and responded to questions from, the Boards.
In providing information to the Boards in connection with the 2021 annual approval process for the Current Agreements (the “2021 Annual Approval Process”) and the New Agreement Approval Process, Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital (as applicable) were guided by requests for information submitted by independent legal counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. In considering and approving the New Agreements, the Trustees considered the information they believed relevant, including but not limited to the information discussed herein. The Boards considered not only the specific information presented in connection with the April and May 2021 Meetings as well as the Board Meeting, but also the knowledge gained over time through interaction with Funds Management, as well as with Wells Capital and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers (collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”), about various topics. In this regard, the Boards review reports of Funds Management at each of their regular

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund  |  51


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board meetings, which includes, among other things, portfolio reviews and investment performance reports. In addition, the Boards confer with portfolio managers at various times throughout the year. The Boards were assisted in their evaluation of the New Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom the Independent Trustees received separate legal advice and with whom the Independent Trustees met separately. The Boards did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each individual Trustee may have attributed different weights to various factors.
Among other information considered by the Boards in connection with the Transaction was:
■  Information regarding the Transaction: information about the structure, financing sources and material terms and conditions of the Transaction, including the expected impact on the businesses conducted by the Advisers and by Wells Fargo Funds Distributor LLC, as the distributor of Fund shares.
■  Information regarding NewCo, GTCR and Reverence Capital: (i) information about NewCo, including information about its expected financial condition and access to capital, and senior leadership team; (ii) the experience of senior management at GTCR and Reverence Capital in acquiring portfolio companies; (iii) the plan to operationalize NewCo, including the transition of necessary infrastructure services through a transition services agreement with Wells Fargo under which Wells Fargo will continue to provide NewCo with certain services for a specified period of time after the closing; and (iv) information regarding regulatory matters, compliance, and risk management functions at NewCo, including resources to be dedicated thereto.
■  Impact of the Transaction on WFAM and Service Providers: (i) information regarding any changes to personnel and/or other resources of the Advisers as a result of the Transaction, including assurances regarding comparable and competitive compensation arrangements to attract and retain highly qualified personnel; and (ii) information about the organizational and operating structure with respect to NewCo, the Advisers and the Funds and Master Portfolios.
■  Impact of the Transaction on the Funds and their Shareholders and the Master Portfolios and their Interest Holders: (i) information regarding anticipated benefits to the Funds and the Master Portfolios as a result of the Transaction; (ii) a commitment that the Funds and Master Portfolios would not bear any expenses, directly or indirectly, in connection with the Transaction; (iii) confirmation that the Advisers and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers intend to continue to manage the Funds in a manner consistent with each Fund’s or Master Portfolio’s current investment objectives and principal investments strategies, as applicable; and (iv) a commitment that neither NewCo nor WFAM will take any steps that would impose any “unfair burden” (as that term is used in section 15(f)(1)(B) of the 1940 Act) on the Funds or the Master Portfolios as a result of the Transaction.
With respect to the New Agreements, the Boards considered: (i) a representation that, after the closing, all of the Funds and Master Portfolios will continue to be managed and advised by their current Advisers and Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, as applicable, and that the same portfolio managers are expected to continue to manage the Funds or Master Portfolios, as applicable, after the Transaction; (ii) information regarding the terms of the New Agreements, including changes as compared to the Current Agreements; (iii) information confirming that the fee rates payable under the New Agreements will not increase as a result of the Transaction as compared to the rates under the Current Agreements; and (iv) assurances that the Transaction is not expected to cause any diminution with respect to the nature, extent and quality of any of the services currently provided to the Funds or the Master Portfolios by the Advisers and Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers as a result of the Transaction.
In addition to considering information furnished specifically to evaluate the impact of the Transaction on the Funds and their respective shareholders and the Master Portfolios and their interest holders in connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards considered information furnished at prior meetings of the Boards and their committees, including detailed information provided in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process. In this regard, in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received information about complex-wide and individual Fund and Master Portfolio performance, fees and expenses, including: (i) a report from an independent data provider comparing the investment performance of each Fund or Master Portfolio to the investment performance of comparable funds and benchmark indices, over various time periods; (ii) a report from an independent data provider comparing each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s total expense ratio (and its components) to those of comparable funds; (iii) comparative information concerning the fees charged and services provided by the Advisers and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, to each Fund or Master Portfolio in managing other accounts (which may include other mutual funds, collective investment funds and institutional accounts), if any, that employ investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing such Fund(s) or Master Portfolio(s) as applicable; and (iv) profitability analyses of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo from providing services to the fund family as a whole.
After its deliberations, the Boards unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the respective New Agreements is reasonable, approved the respective New Agreements for a two-year term, and

52  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
voted to recommend that Fund shareholders approve the New Agreements. The Boards considered the approval of the New Agreements as part of their consideration of agreements for funds and master portfolios across the complex, but their approvals were made on a fund-by-fund basis. The following summarizes a number of important, but not necessarily all, factors considered by the Boards in support of their approvals.
Nature, extent and quality of services
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered various information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds and Master Portfolios by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the Current Agreements. This information included a description of the investment advisory services and Fund-level administrative services covered by the Current Agreements, as well as, among other things, a summary of the background and experience of senior management of WFAM, of which Funds Management and Wells Capital are a part, and a summary of investments made in the business of WFAM. The Boards also received a description of Funds Management’s and Wells Capital’s business continuity plans, including a summary of the performance of such plans and any changes thereto during the COVID-19 pandemic, and of their approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity. The Boards also received and reviewed information about Funds Management’s role as administrator of the Funds’ and Master Portfolios’ liquidity risk management program, Funds Management’s approach to risk management, and Funds Management’s intermediary and vendor oversight program.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also considered the qualifications, background, tenure and responsibilities of each of the portfolio managers primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the Funds and the Master Portfolios. The Boards evaluated the ability of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to attract and retain qualified investment professionals, including research, advisory and supervisory personnel.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards further considered the compliance programs and compliance records of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers. In addition, the Boards took into account the full range of services provided to the Funds by Funds Management and its affiliates.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards considered, among other information, the structure of the Transaction and expected impact, if any, of the Transaction on the operations, facilities, organization and personnel of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers. The Boards received assurances from Funds Management that each Fund and Master Portfolio will continue to be advised by its current Sub-Advisers after the closing, and that the same individual portfolio managers are expected to continue to manage the Funds and Master Portfolios, respectively, after the closing. With respect to the recruitment and retention of key personnel, the Boards noted information from GTCR, Reverence Capital and the Advisers regarding the potential benefits for employees of joining NewCo. The Boards recognized that the personnel of the Advisers who had been extended offers may not accept such offers, and personnel changes at the Advisers or the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers may occur in the future in the ordinary course.
In addition, the Boards considered information regarding the infrastructure, operational capabilities and support staff in place to assist in the portfolio management and operations of the Funds and Master Portfolios, as applicable, including the provision of administrative services, and the anticipated impact of the Transaction on such matters. The Boards also considered the business-related and other risks to which the Advisers and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers may be subject in managing the Funds and Master Portfolios, as applicable, and in connection with the Transaction. The Boards also considered the transition and integration plans as a result of the change in ownership of the Advisers from Wells Fargo to NewCo. The Boards considered the resources and infrastructure that NewCo intends to devote to its compliance program to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations, as well as its risk management program and cybersecurity program. The Boards also took into account assurances received from the Advisers, GTCR and Reverence Capital that the Transaction is not expected to cause any diminution in the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Advisers or the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers to the Funds and their shareholders or to the Master Portfolios and their interest holders, as applicable.
Fund investment performance and expenses
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards considered the investment performance results for each Fund over various time periods ended December 31, 2020. The Boards considered these results in comparison to the investment performance of funds in a universe that was determined by Broadridge Inc. (“Broadridge”) to be similar to each Fund (the “Universe”), and in comparison to each Fund’s benchmark index and to other comparative data. Broadridge is an independent provider of investment company data. The Boards received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the performance Universe. Where applicable, the Boards received information concerning, and discussed factors contributing to, underperformance of Funds relative to the Universe and benchmark for any underperformance periods.
The Master Trust Board of Trustees took note of the investment performance of the Master Portfolios in the context of reviewing the investment performance of the Funds.

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund  |  53


Board considerations (unaudited)
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also received and considered information regarding each Fund’s and Portfolio’s net operating expense ratios and their various components, including actual management fees, custodian and other non-management fees, and Rule 12b-1 and non-Rule 12b-1 shareholder service fees. The Boards considered these ratios in comparison to the median ratios of funds in class-specific expense groups that were determined by Broadridge to be similar to each Fund (the “Groups”). The Boards received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the expense Groups and an explanation of how funds comprising expense groups and their expense ratios may vary from year-to-year.
With respect to the Master Portfolios, the Master Trust Board of Trustees reviewed the fee rates that are payable to Funds Management for investment advisory services, which are the only fees charged at the Master Portfolio level, relative to a corresponding expense Group. In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards received a commitment that WFAM will maintain fee and expense commitments for at least two years after the closing. The Boards took into account each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s investment performance and expense information among the factors considered in deciding to approve the New Agreements.
Investment management, advisory and sub-advisory fee rates
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board of Trustees of the Trust noted that Funds Management receives no advisory fees from a Fund as long as the Fund continues to invest all (or substantially all) of its assets in a single master portfolio. If a Fund were to change its investment structure so that it began investing in two or more master portfolios (a fund-of-funds), Funds Management would be entitled to receive an annual fee of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets for providing investment advisory services to the Fund, including allocating the Fund’s assets among the Master Portfolios.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board of Trustees of the Trust reviewed and considered the contractual fee rates that are payable by each Fund to Funds Management under the Fund’s Management Agreement for management services (other than investment advisory services), as well as the contractual fee rates payable by the Fund to Funds Management for class-level administrative services under a Class-Level Administration Agreement, which include, among other things, class-level transfer agency and subtransfer agency costs (collectively, the “Management Rates”). The Master Trust Board of Trustees reviewed and considered the contractual investment advisory fee rate that is payable by each Master Portfolio to Funds Management for investment advisory services under the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement (the “Advisory Agreement Rate”). The Master Trust Board of Trustees also reviewed and considered the contractual investment sub-advisory fee rates that are payable by Funds Management to the Sub-Advisers for investment sub-advisory services (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement Rates”).
Among other information reviewed by the Boards in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, was a comparison of each Fund’s Management Rates which, for this purpose, includes the advisory fees paid at the Master Portfolio level, with the average contractual investment management fee rates of funds in the expense Groups at a common asset level as well as transfer agency costs of the funds in the expense Groups.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also received and considered information about the nature and extent of services offered and fee rates charged by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to other types of clients, if any, with investment strategies similar to those of each Fund. In this regard, the Boards received information about the significantly greater scope of services, and compliance, reporting and other legal burdens and risks of managing proprietary mutual funds compared with those associated with managing assets of other types of clients, including third-party sub-advised fund clients and non-mutual fund clients such as institutional separate accounts.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards noted the assurances received by it that there would be no increases to any of the Management Rates, the Advisory Agreement Rates or the Sub-Advisory Agreement Rates as a result of the Transaction. The Boards also considered that the New Agreements do not change the computation method for calculating such fees, and there is no present intention to reduce expense waiver and reimbursement arrangements that are currently in effect. Based on their consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Boards determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the New Management Agreement and the New Advisory Agreement and payable to the Sub-Advisers under the New Sub-Advisory Agreements was reasonable.
Profitability
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered information concerning the profitability of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo from providing services to the fund family as a whole. The Boards noted that Wells Capital’s profitability information with respect to providing services to each Fund and other funds in the family was subsumed in the WFAM and Wells Fargo profitability analysis. The Boards did not consider profitability with respect to the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, as the sub-advisory fees paid to the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers had been negotiated by Funds Management on an arm’s-length basis.

54  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
Funds Management reported on the methodologies and estimates used in calculating profitability in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, including a description of the methodology used to allocate certain expenses. Among other things, the Boards noted that the levels of profitability reported on a fund-by-fund basis varied widely, depending on factors such as the size, type and age of fund.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards received certain information about NewCo’s projected financial condition, and reviewed with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital the underlying assumptions on which such information was based. The Boards considered that NewCo is a newly formed entity, with no historical operations, revenues or expenses, and that it is difficult to predict with any degree of certainty the future profitability of NewCo and the Advisers from advisory activities under the New Agreements. The Boards considered that the fee rates payable under the New Agreements will not increase as a result of the Transaction as compared to the rates under the Current Agreements, and that the current contractual expense limitations applicable to each Fund will not increase. The Boards noted that if the New Agreements are approved by shareholders and the Transaction closes, the Boards will have the opportunity in the future to review the profitability of NewCo and the Advisers from advisory activities under the New Agreements with the Advisers.
Economies of scale
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered information about the potential for Funds Management to experience economies of scale in the provision of management services to the Funds and the Master Portfolios, the difficulties of calculating economies of scale at an individual fund level, and the extent to which potential scale benefits are shared with Fund shareholders. The Boards noted the existence of breakpoints in each Fund’s management fee structure and each Master Portfolio’s advisory fee structure, which operate generally to reduce each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s and expense ratios as they grows in size, and the size of each Fund and Master Portfolio and in relation to such breakpoints. The Boards considered that, in addition to advisory fee and management fee and advisory fee breakpoints, Funds Management shares potential economies of scale from its management business in a variety of ways, including through fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangements, competitive management fee rates set at the outset without regard to breakpoints, and investments in the business intended to enhance services available to shareholders.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards noted that NewCo and the Advisers may benefit from possible growth of the Funds and Master Portfolios resulting from enhanced distribution capabilities. However, the Boards noted that other factors could also affect the potential for economies of scale, and that it was not possible to quantify any potential future economies of scale. Based upon the information furnished to the Boards in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process and the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards concluded that Funds Management’s arrangements with respect to each Fund and Master Portfolio, including contractual breakpoints and expense limitation arrangements, constitute a reasonable approach to sharing potential economies of scale with the Fund and its shareholders and the Master Portfolio and its interest holders.
“Fall-out” benefits to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered information regarding potential “fall-out” or ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including Wells Capital, and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers as a result of their relationships with the Funds and the Master Portfolios, as applicable. Ancillary benefits could include, among others, benefits directly attributable to other relationships with the Funds and Master Portfolios and benefits potentially derived from an increase in Funds Management’s and the Wells Capital’s business as a result of their relationships with the Funds and the Master Portfolios. The Boards noted that various current affiliates of Funds Management may receive distribution-related fees, shareholder servicing payments and sub-transfer agency fees in respect of shares sold or held through them and services provided.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also reviewed information about any soft dollar credits earned and utilized by the Sub-Advisers, fees earned by Funds Management and Wells Capital from managing a private investment vehicle for the fund family’s securities lending collateral, and commissions earned by an affiliated broker of Wells Fargo from portfolio transactions.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards received information to the effect that the Transaction is not expected to have a material impact on the fall-out benefits currently realized by Funds Management and its affiliates, including Wells Capital, and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers. The information reviewed by the Boards also noted that several of the ancillary benefits identified for WFAM would be potential ancillary benefits for NewCo, including that the scale and reputation of the Funds and Master Portfolios might benefit NewCo’s broader reputation, product initiatives, technology investment and talent acquisition. Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund  |  55


Board considerations (unaudited)
Boards did not find that any ancillary benefits expected to be received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including NewCo and Wells Capital and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, under the New Agreements were unreasonable.
Conclusion
At the Board Meeting, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Boards unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the New Agreements is reasonable, approved the New Agreements for a two-year term, and voted to recommend that Fund shareholders approve the New Agreements.

56  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board Considerations - Interim Agreements
At a meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Board Meeting”), the Boards of Trustees (each, a “Board”, and collectively, the “Boards”) of Wells Fargo Funds Trust, Wells Fargo Master Trust, Wells Fargo Variable Trust, Wells Fargo Global Dividend Opportunity Fund, Wells Fargo Income Opportunities Fund, Wells Fargo Multi-Sector Income Fund and Wells Fargo Utilities and High Income Fund (each a “Trust”, and the series thereof, a “Fund”) reviewed and approved for the Trusts and Funds, as applicable: (i) interim investment management agreements (the “Interim Management Agreements”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”); (ii) interim investment advisory agreements (the “Interim Advisory Agreements”) with Funds Management; and (iii) interim sub-advisory agreements (the “Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements”) with each of Cooke & Bieler, L.P., Galliard Capital Management LLC (“Galliard”), Peregrine Capital Management Inc., Wells Capital Management LLC (“WellsCap”), and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited (“WFAMI”, and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”). Each Trustee on the Board is not an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) of the Funds (collectively, the “Independent Trustees”). The Interim Management Agreements, Interim Advisory Agreements, and Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements are collectively referred to as the “Interim Advisory Agreements.”
At the Board Meeting, the Boards reviewed and approved the continuation of existing investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements (the “Current Advisory Agreements”) for each Trust and Fund, as applicable. The factors considered and conclusions reached by the Boards in approving the Current Advisory Agreements are summarized in the section entitled “Board Considerations – Current Agreements” of this shareholder report. The Boards noted that Wells Fargo & Company has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”), which includes Funds Management, Galliard, WellsCap and WFAMI (the “Affiliated Sub-Advisers”), to a holding company affiliated with private funds of GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. (the “Transaction”). The Boards further noted that the Transaction would result in a change-of-control of Funds Management and the Affiliated Sub-Advisers, which would be considered to be an “assignment” under the 1940 Act that would terminate the Current Advisory Agreements. At the Board Meeting, the Boards also reviewed and approved new investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements (the “New Advisory Agreements”) for each Trust and Fund, as applicable, that would replace the Current Advisory Agreements upon consummation of the Transaction, subject to approval of the New Advisory Agreements by the applicable Trust’s or Fund’s shareholders. The factors considered and conclusions reached by the Boards in approving the New Advisory Agreements are summarized in the section entitled “Board Considerations – New Agreements” of this shareholder report.
At the Board Meeting, the Boards also approved the Interim Advisory Agreements, which will go into effect for a Trust or Fund only in the event that shareholders of such Trust or Fund do not approve the New Advisory Agreement(s) for the Trust or Fund by the closing date of the Transaction, when the Current Advisory Agreements will terminate. The Board noted that, in such a circumstance, the Interim Advisory Agreements will permit continuity of management by allowing Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to continue providing services to the Trust or Fund pursuant to the Interim Advisory Agreements while the Trust or Fund continues to solicit shareholder approval of such New Advisory Agreement(s). The Boards noted that the terms of the Interim Advisory Agreements are identical to those of the Current Advisory Agreements, except for the term and the addition of escrow provisions with respect to the advisory fees. The Boards also noted that the entities that would service the Funds and Trusts under the Interim Advisory Agreements are identical to those that provide services under the Current Advisory Agreements and those that will provide services under the New Advisory Agreements.
In approving the Interim Advisory Agreements, the Boards considered the same factors and reached the same conclusions as they considered and reached with respect to the Boards’ approvals of the Current Advisory Agreements and New Advisory Agreements, as applicable, which are described in separate Board Consideration sections within this shareholder report. Prior to the Board Meeting, including at a series of meetings held in April and May 2021, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. about the Interim Advisory Agreements and related matters. The Independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Interim Advisory Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately.
At the Board Meeting, after considering the factors and reaching the conclusions described in the separate Board Consideration sections within this shareholder report, the Boards unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and to each Sub-Adviser under each of the Interim Advisory Agreements was reasonable, and approved the Interim Advisory Agreements.

Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund  |  57


For more information
More information about Wells Fargo Funds is available free upon request. To obtain literature, please write, visit the Fund's website, or call:
Wells Fargo Funds
P.O. Box 219967
Kansas City, MO 64121-9967
Website: wfam.com
Individual investors: 1-800-222-8222
Retail investment professionals: 1-888-877-9275
Institutional investment professionals: 1-866-765-0778
This report and the financial statements contained herein are submitted for the general information of the shareholders of the Fund. If this report is used for promotional purposes, distribution of the report must be accompanied or preceded by a current prospectus. Before investing, please consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of the investment. For a current prospectus and, if available, a summary prospectus, containing this information, call 1-800-222-8222 or visit the Fund's website at wfam.com. Read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) is the trade name for certain investment advisory/management firms owned by Wells Fargo & Company. These firms include but are not limited to Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC. Certain products managed by WFAM entities are distributed by Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC (a broker-dealer and Member FINRA).
This material is for general informational and educational purposes only and is NOT intended to provide investment advice or a recommendation of any kind - including a recommendation for any specific investment, strategy, or plan.
 INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED  ■  NO BANK GUARANTEE  ■  MAY LOSE VALUE 
© 2021 Wells Fargo & Company. All rights reserved.
PAR-0621-00766 07-21
A285/AR285 05-21


Annual Report
May 31, 2021
Wells Fargo
Small Company Value Fund




Contents

2

6

11
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund  

12
Financial statements  

13

14

15

16

21

26
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio  

27
Financial statements  

33

34

35

36

37

42

43
Board considerations  

48

52

58
 
Reduce clutter.
Save trees.
Sign up for electronic delivery of prospectuses and shareholder reports at wellsfargo.com/ advantagedelivery
The views expressed and any forward-looking statements are as of May 31, 2021, unless otherwise noted, and are those of the Fund's portfolio managers and/or Wells Fargo Asset Management. Discussions of individual securities or the markets generally are not intended as individual recommendations. Future events or results may vary significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. The views expressed are subject to change at any time in response to changing circumstances in the market. Wells Fargo Asset Management and the Fund disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any views expressed or forward-looking statements.
 INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED  ■  NO BANK GUARANTEE  ■  MAY LOSE VALUE 

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund  |  1


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
Andrew Owen
President
Wells Fargo Funds
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to offer you this annual report for the Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021. Despite the initial challenges presented by the spread of COVID-19 cases and the business restrictions implemented throughout much of the world, global stocks showed robust returns, supported by global stimulus programs, a rapid vaccination rollout, and recovering consumer and corporate sentiment. Bond markets mostly produced positive returns, as investors searched for yield and diversification during difficult market stretches.
For the 12-month period, equities had robust returns, as policymakers continued to fight the effects of COVID-19. Emerging market stocks led both non-U.S. developed market equities and U.S. stocks. Gains by fixed-income securities were varied, though mostly positive. For the period, U.S. stocks, based on the S&P 500 Index,1 gained 40.32%. International stocks, as measured by the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net),2 returned 42.78%, while the MSCI EM Index (Net),3 had stronger performance, with a 51.00% gain. Among bond indexes, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index,4 returned -0.40%, the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (unhedged),5 gained 7.84%, the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index,6 returned 4.74%, and the ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index,7 returned 15.18%.
The COVID-19 lockdown began over a year ago.
By June, economies started to reopen and global central banks committed to do all they could to provide economic support through liquidity and low borrowing costs. U.S. economic activity was aided by one-time $1,200 stimulus checks and $600 weekly bonus unemployment benefits that lasted through July. However, unemployment remained historically high and COVID-19 cases began to increase by late June. China’s economic recovery began to pick up momentum.
July was broadly positive for equities and fixed income. However, economic data and a resurgence of COVID-19 cases underscored the urgent need to regain control of the pandemic. Second-quarter gross domestic product (GDP) shrank from the previous quarter by 9.5% and 12.1% in the U.S. and the eurozone, respectively. In contrast, China’s second-quarter GDP grew 3.2% year over year. The U.S. economy added 1.8 million jobs in July, but a double-digit jobless rate persisted.

1 The S&P 500 Index consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. It is a market-value-weighted index with each stock's weight in the index proportionate to its market value. You cannot invest directly in an index.
2 The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) All Country World Index (ACWI) ex USA Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed and emerging markets, excluding the United States. Source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI. You cannot invest directly in an index.

3 The MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure equity market performance of emerging markets. You cannot invest directly in an index.

4 The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based benchmark that measures the investment-grade, U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage pass-throughs), asset-backed securities, and commercial mortgage-backed securities. You cannot invest directly in an index.

5 The Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (unhedged) is an unmanaged index that provides a broad-based measure of the global investment-grade fixed-income markets excluding the U.S. dollar-denominated debt market. You cannot invest directly in an index.

6 The Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index composed of long-term tax-exempt bonds with a minimum credit rating of Baa. You cannot invest directly in an index.

7 The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index of domestic and Yankee high-yield bonds. The index tracks the performance of high-yield securities traded in the U.S. bond market. You cannot invest directly in an index. Copyright 2021. ICE Data Indices, LLC. All rights reserved.

2  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
The stock market continued to rally in August despite concerns over rising numbers of U.S. and European COVID-19 cases as well as the July expiration of the $600 weekly bonus unemployment benefit. Relatively strong second-quarter earnings boosted investor sentiment along with the U.S. Federal Reserve Board’s (Fed’s) announcement of a monetary policy shift expected to support longer-term low interest rates. U.S. manufacturing and services activity indexes beat expectations while the U.S. housing market maintained strength. In Europe, retail sales expanded and consumer confidence was steady. China’s economy continued to expand.
Stocks grew more volatile in September on mixed economic data. U.S. economic activity continued to grow. However, U.S. unemployment remained elevated at 7.9% in September. With the U.S. Congress delaying further fiscal relief and uncertainties surrounding a possible vaccine, doubts crept back into the financial markets. In the U.K., a lack of progress in Brexit talks weighed on markets. China’s economy picked up steam, fueled by increased global demand.
In October, capital markets stepped back from their six-month rally. Market volatility rose in advance of the U.S. election and amid a global increase in COVID-19 infections. Europe introduced tighter restrictions affecting economic activity. U.S. markets looked favorably at the prospect of Democratic control of the federal purse strings, which could lead to additional fiscal stimulus and a boost to economic activity. Meanwhile, China reported 4.9% third-quarter GDP growth.
Global stocks rallied in November, propelled by optimism over three promising COVID-19 vaccines. Reversing recent trends, value stocks outperformed growth stocks and cyclical stocks outpaced information technology (IT) stocks. However, U.S. unemployment remained elevated, with a net job loss of 10 million since February. The eurozone services Purchasing Managers' Index, a monthly survey of purchasing managers, contracted sharply while the region’s manufacturing activity grew. The U.S. election results added to the upbeat mood as investors anticipated more consistent policies in the new administration.
Financial markets ended the year with strength on high expectations for a rapid rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines, the successful passage of a $900 billion stimulus package, and rising expectations of additional economic support from a Democratic-led Congress. U.S. economic data were mixed with still-elevated unemployment and weak retail sales but growth in manufacturing output. In contrast, China’s economic expansion continued in both manufacturing and nonmanufacturing. U.S. COVID-19 infection rates continued to rise even as new state and local lockdown measures were implemented.
The calendar year 2021 began with emerging market stocks leading all major asset classes in January, driven by China’s strong economic growth and a broad recovery in corporate earnings, which propelled China’s stock market higher. In the U.S., positive news on vaccine trials and January expansion in both the manufacturing and services sectors was offset by a weak December monthly jobs report. This was compounded by technical factors as some hedge funds were forced to sell stocks to protect themselves against a well-publicized short squeeze coordinated by a group of retail investors. Eurozone sentiment and economic growth were particularly weak, reflecting the impact of a new lockdown with stricter social distancing along with a slow vaccine rollout.
February saw major domestic equity indexes driven higher on the hope of a new stimulus bill, improving COVID-19 vaccination numbers, and the gradual reopening of the economy. Most S&P 500 companies reported better-than-expected earnings, with positive surprises coming from the financials, IT, health care, and materials sectors. Japan saw its economy strengthen as a result of strong export numbers. Meanwhile, crude oil prices continued their climb, rising more than 25% for the year. Domestic government bonds experienced a sharp sell-off in late February as markets priced in a more robust economic recovery and higher future growth and inflation expectations.
Global stocks rallied in November, propelled by optimism over three promising COVID-19 vaccines.

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund  |  3


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
The passage of the massive domestic stimulus bill highlighted March activity, leading to increased forecasts for U.S. growth in 2021.
The passage of the massive domestic stimulus bill highlighted March activity, leading to increased forecasts for U.S. growth in 2021. Domestic employment surged as COVID-19 vaccinations and an increasingly open economy spurred hiring. A majority of U.S. small companies reported they were operating at pre-pandemic capacity or higher. Value stocks continued its outperformance of growth stocks in the month, continuing the trend that started in late 2020. Meanwhile, most major developed global equity indexes were up month to date on the back of rising optimism regarding the outlook for global growth. While the U.S. and U.K. have been the most successful in terms of the vaccine rollout, even in markets where the vaccine has lagged, such as in the eurozone and Japan, equity indexes in many of those countries have also been in positive territory this year.
Equity markets produced another strong showing in April. Domestically, the continued reopening of the economy had a strong impact on positive equity performance, as people started leaving their households and jobless claims continued to fall. Domestic corporate bonds performed well and the U.S. dollar weakened. Meanwhile, the U.S. government continued to seek to invest in the recovery, this time by outlining a package of over $2 billion to improve infrastructure. The primary headwind in April was inflation, as investors tried to determine the breadth and longevity of recent price increases. Developed Europe has been supported by a meaningful increase in the pace of vaccinations. Unfortunately many emerging market countries have not been as successful. India in particular has seen COVID-19 cases surge, serving as an example of the need to get vaccinations rolled out to less developed nations.
Vaccine rollouts continued in May, leading to loosened restrictions globally. As a result, equity markets in general saw a minor increase in returns. Concerns that the continued economic rebound could result in inflation increases becoming more than transitory were supported by the higher input costs businesses are experiencing. Meanwhile, those inflation concerns were tempered by the Fed, which stayed steady on its view of the economy and eased fears of a sudden and substantial policy change. Positive performance in the emerging market equity space was supported this month by steady consumer demand and strong commodity prices. Fixed-income markets were also slightly positive for the month, driven by inflation uncertainty and a softer U.S. dollar.
Don’t let short-term uncertainty derail long-term investment goals.
Periods of investment uncertainty can present challenges, but experience has taught us that maintaining long-term investment goals can be an effective way to plan for the future. Although diversification cannot guarantee an investment profit or prevent losses, we believe it can be an effective way to manage investment risk and potentially smooth out overall portfolio performance. We encourage investors to know their investments and to understand that appropriate levels of risk-taking may unlock opportunities.
Thank you for choosing to invest with Wells Fargo Funds. We appreciate your confidence in us and remain committed to helping you meet your financial needs.
Sincerely,
Andrew Owen
President
Wells Fargo Funds

For further information about your Fund, contact your investment professional, visit our website at wfam.com, or call us directly at 1-800-222-8222.

4  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund


This page is intentionally left blank.


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Investment objective The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
Manager Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC
Subadviser for the affiliated master portfolio*
Wells Capital Management Incorporated
Portfolio managers Jeff Goverman, Garth R. Nisbet, CFA®, Craig Pieringer, CFA®
    
Average annual total returns (%) as of May 31, 2021
    Including sales charge   Excluding sales charge   Expense ratios1 (%)
  Inception date 1 year 5 year 10 year   1 year 5 year 10 year   Gross Net 2
Class A (SCVAX) 1-31-2002 67.58 12.03 9.64   77.80 13.36 10.29   1.33 1.15
Class C (SCVFX) 8-30-2002 75.80 12.56 9.48   76.80 12.56 9.48   2.08 1.90
Class R6 (SCVJX)3 10-31-2016   78.63 13.82 10.65   0.90 0.75
Administrator Class (SCVIX) 1-31-2002   77.91 13.49 10.46   1.25 1.05
Institutional Class (SCVNX) 7-30-2010   78.39 13.72 10.69   1.00 0.85
Russell 2000® Value Index4   79.38 13.83 10.64  
Figures quoted represent past performance, which is no guarantee of future results, and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder may pay on an investment in a fund. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance shown without sales charges would be lower if sales charges were reflected. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted, which assumes the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. Current month-end performance is available on the Fund’s website, wfam.com.
Please keep in mind that high double-digit returns were primarily achieved during favorable market conditions. You should not expect that such favorable returns can be consistently achieved. A fund’s performance, especially for short time periods, should not be the sole factor in making your investment decision.
Index returns do not include transaction costs associated with buying and selling securities, any mutual fund fees or expenses, or any taxes. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
For Class A shares, the maximum front-end sales charge is 5.75%. For Class C shares, the maximum contingent deferred sales charge is 1.00%. Performance including a contingent deferred sales charge assumes the sales charge for the corresponding time period. Class R6, Administrator Class, and Institutional Class shares are sold without a front-end sales charge or contingent deferred sales charge.
1 Reflects the expense ratios as stated in the most recent prospectuses. The expense ratios shown are subject to change and may differ from the annualized expense ratios shown in the financial highlights of this report.
2 The manager has contractually committed through September 30, 2021, to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers at 1.15% for Class A, 1.90% for Class C, 0.75% for Class R6, 1.05% for Administrator Class, and 0.85% for Institutional Class. Brokerage commissions, stamp duty fees, interest, taxes, acquired fund fees and expenses (if any) from funds in which the affiliated master portfolio invests, and extraordinary expenses are excluded from the expense caps. Net expenses from the affiliated master portfolio are included in the expense caps. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. Without these caps, the Fund’s returns would have been lower. The expense ratio paid by an investor is the net expense ratio (the total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers) as stated in the prospectuses.
3 Historical performance shown for the Class R6 shares prior to their inception reflects the performance of the Institutional Class shares, and includes the higher expenses applicable to the Institutional Class shares. If these expenses had been included, returns for the Class R6 shares would be higher.
4 The Russell 2000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 companies with lower price/book ratios and lower forecasted growth values. You cannot invest directly in an index.

* The Fund is a feeder fund in a master-feeder structure that invests substantially all of its assets in a single affiliated master portfolio of the Wells Fargo Master Trust with a substantially identical investment objective and substantially similar investment strategies. References to the investment activities of the Fund are intended to refer to the investment activities of the affiliated master portfolio in which it invests.
CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.

6  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Growth of $10,000 investment as of May 31, 20211
1 The chart compares the performance of Class A shares for the most recent ten years with the Russell 2000® Value Index. The chart assumes a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in Class A shares and reflects all operating expenses and assumes the maximum initial sales charge of 5.75%.
Stock values fluctuate in response to the activities of individual companies and general market and economic conditions. Smaller-company stocks tend to be more volatile and less liquid than those of larger companies. Certain investment strategies tend to increase the total risk of an investment (relative to the broader market). The Fund is exposed to foreign investment risk. Consult the Fund’s prospectus for additional information on these and other risks.

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund  |  7


Performance highlights (unaudited)

8  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund


Performance highlights (unaudited)
MANAGER'S DISCUSSION
Fund highlights
The Fund underperformed its benchmark, the Russell 2000® Value Index, for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021.
The consumer discretionary and materials sectors detracted from relative performance. Within consumer discretionary, underperformance in hotels, restaurants, and leisure stocks were the main detractors from performance, while investments in paper and forest products detracted from performance in the materials sector.
The financials and utilities sectors were the primary contributors to relative performance. Within the financials sector, the Fund’s bank stocks contributed to relative performance, while an underweight position in the underperforming utilities sector also contributed to performance.
During the period, investors anticipated the reopening of the economy.
During the 12-month period ending May 31, 2021, the U.S. stock market posted an all-time high, eclipsing the high posted before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Investors celebrated once multiple vaccines were authorized for emergency use in November, and the Biden administration announced its plan to make every adult in the U.S. eligible for vaccination no later than May 1, with a secondary goal of getting the nation closer to normal by the Fourth of July. Over the 12-month period, the S&P 500 Index* rose a strong 40.32% while the Russell 2000® Value Index rose an extraordinary 79.38%.
We increased exposure to cyclical sectors and benefited from the end of the stay-at-home trade.
These cyclical sectors—industrials, materials, and consumer discretionary—were the most leveraged to the reopening of the U.S. economy and hence offered the best opportunity for positive earnings surprises. The stock market ended the 12-month period near record highs as the U.S. approached the milestone of administering more than 300 million vaccine doses.
Stock selection within consumer discretionary and materials sectors was the primary detractor from performance.
Within the consumer discretionary sector, underperformance in hotels, restaurants, and leisure stocks detracted from performance primarily due to underweight positions in outperforming gaming and hotel stocks over the past year. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Limited**, a global cruise line operator, was the main detractor from performance as the company was negatively affected by the suspension of voyages due to the global pandemic. Within the materials
sector, stock selection detracted from performance primarily due to the Fund’s paper and forest products holdings. Neenah, Incorporated**, which provides a variety of filtering media, fine paper, and packaging products, was the main detractor from performance. Despite strong demand for Neenah’s technical products, raw material inflation has negatively affected the company’s expected earnings recovery.
Ten largest holdings (%) as of May 31, 20211
Schnitzer Steel Industries Incorporated Class A 1.38
Synovus Financial Corporation 1.36
Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation 1.33
Ameris Bancorp 1.31
American Eagle Outfitters Incorporated 1.19
Minerals Technologies Incorporated 1.18
MYR Group Incorporated 1.16
Herman Miller Incorporated 1.16
Customers Bancorp Incorporated 1.14
Piper Jaffray Companies Incorporated 1.12
1 Each holding represents the Fund’s allocable portion of the affiliated master portfolio security. Figures represent each holding as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets. Holdings are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
Stock selection within financials and allocation effect within utilities were the main contributors to performance.
The Fund’s bank holdings were the main contributor to relative outperformance within financials as rising interest rates and inflation expectations were a tailwind for banking stocks. From a stock-specific perspective, Western Alliance Bancorp was the primary contributor to performance. Western Alliance has outperformed over the past year due to better-than-expected results highlighted by increases in net
 

* The S&P 500 Index consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. It is a market-value-weighted index with each stock's weight in the index proportionate to its market value. You cannot invest directly in an index.
** This security was no longer held at the end of the reporting period.

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund  |  9


Performance highlights (unaudited)
interest margin, deposit growth, and an improvement in its loan-to-deposit ratio. Credit quality has improved significantly as total nonperforming assets continue to decline faster than expected and net charge-offs have decreased sequentially. The Phoenix-based bank continues to demonstrate solid loan growth funded by low-cost deposits. Additionally, the Fund’s underweight position in the underperforming utilities sector contributed to relative performance.
Sector allocation as of May 31, 20211
1 Figures represent the sector allocation of the affiliated master portfolio as a percentage of the long-term investments of the affiliated master portfolio. These amounts are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
The unprecedented U.S. fiscal stimulus continues.
The third and latest fiscal stimulus package—the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021—was signed into law on March 11, 2021. Additional stimulus is expected via the proposed American Jobs Plan aimed at physical infrastructure addressing road, bridge, and utility repair; clean energy investment; and enhanced broadband access. The American Families Plan is aimed at helping families cover basic expenses such as education, childcare, medical leave, and nutritional assistance. The ultimate size of these plans remains to be seen as they wind their way through Congress.
As the economy continues to reopen, we expect the cyclical sectors will continue to outperform.
History has shown that small-cap value performs best during periods of cyclical rebound with rising gross domestic product, rising inflation, and rising interest rates. The current stimulus environment points toward all three of these conditions continuing.
The Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund does not mirror a benchmark.
The Fund is fundamentals-driven and true small-cap value with a smaller median market cap and lower forward price/earnings than the Russell 2000® Value benchmark. The Fund emphasizes quality style factors such as earnings quality, profitability, and (less) leverage. At the time of investment, the companies we purchase belong to one or more of the following four categories: neglected, oversold, thematic, and earnings turnaround. We remain constructive on the current environment and expect relative outperformance by small-cap value.
 

10  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund


Fund expenses (unaudited)
As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and contingent deferred sales charges (if any) on redemptions and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) and/or shareholder servicing fees, and other Fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period from December 1, 2020 to May 31, 2021.
Actual expenses
The “Actual” line of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the “Actual” line under the heading entitled “Expenses paid during period” for your applicable class of shares to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes
The “Hypothetical” line of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) and contingent deferred sales charges. Therefore, the “Hypothetical” line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
  Beginning
account value
12-1-2020
Ending
account value
5-31-2021
Expenses
paid during
the period1,2
Annualized net
expense ratio2
Class A        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,399.96 $ 6.82 1.14%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,019.25 $ 5.74 1.14%
Class C        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,394.62 $11.34 1.90%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,015.46 $ 9.55 1.90%
Class R6        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,402.21 $ 4.49 0.75%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,021.19 $ 3.78 0.75%
Administrator Class        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,399.88 $ 6.28 1.05%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,019.70 $ 5.29 1.05%
Institutional Class        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,401.45 $ 5.09 0.85%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,020.69 $ 4.28 0.85%
1 Expenses paid is equal to the annualized net expense ratio of each class multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one-half-year period).
2 Amounts reflect net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio in which the Fund invests.

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund  |  11


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

          Value
Investment companies:  99.68%          
Affiliated master portfolio:  99.68%          
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio         $529,548,192
Total Investment companies (Cost $357,102,515)         529,548,192
Total investments in securities (Cost $357,102,515) 99.68%       529,548,192
Other assets and liabilities, net 0.32         1,704,556
Total net assets 100.00%       $531,252,748
Transactions with the affiliated Master Portfolio were as follows:
  % of
ownership,
beginning
of period
% of
ownership,
end of
period
Net realized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Dividends
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Affiliated
income
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Value,
end of
period
% of
net
assets
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio 80.34% 85.41% $29,216,420 $204,433,580 $5,852,151 $36,076 $529,548,192 99.68%
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

12  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund


Statement of assets and liabilities—May 31, 2021
   
Assets  
Investments in affiliated Master Portfolio, at value (cost $357,102,515)

$ 529,548,192
Receivable for Fund shares sold

1,923,615
Receivable from manager

49,093
Prepaid expenses and other assets

205,161
Total assets

531,726,061
Liabilities  
Payable for Fund shares redeemed

256,541
Shareholder servicing fees payable

94,726
Administration fees payable

85,430
Distribution fee payable

2,110
Trustees’ fees and expenses payable

269
Accrued expenses and other liabilities

34,237
Total liabilities

473,313
Total net assets

$531,252,748
Net assets consist of  
Paid-in capital

$ 378,799,454
Total distributable earnings

152,453,294
Total net assets

$531,252,748
Computation of net asset value and offering price per share  
Net assets – Class A

$ 414,012,855
Shares outstanding – Class A1

11,155,001
Net asset value per share – Class A

$37.11
Maximum offering price per share – Class A2

$39.37
Net assets – Class C

$ 3,387,845
Shares outstanding – Class C1

103,648
Net asset value per share – Class C

$32.69
Net assets – Class R6

$ 9,007,412
Shares outstanding – Class R61

235,025
Net asset value per share – Class R6

$38.33
Net assets – Administrator Class

$ 32,721,453
Shares outstanding – Administrator Class1

861,465
Net asset value per share – Administrator Class

$37.98
Net assets – Institutional Class

$ 72,123,183
Shares outstanding – Institutional Class1

1,891,732
Net asset value per share – Institutional Class

$38.13
1 The Fund has an unlimited number of authorized shares.
2 Maximum offering price is computed as 100/94.25 of net asset value. On investments of $50,000 or more, the offering price is reduced.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund  |  13


Statement of operations—year ended May 31, 2021
   
Investment income  
Dividends allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio (net of foreign withholding taxes of $5,681)

$ 5,852,151
Affiliated income allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

36,076
Expenses allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

(3,347,515)
Waivers allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

346,045
Total investment income

2,886,757
Expenses  
Management fee

202,923
Administration fees  
Class A

683,755
Class C

7,265
Class R6

2,211
Administrator Class

29,222
Institutional Class

61,022
Shareholder servicing fees  
Class A

812,810
Class C

8,600
Administrator Class

56,091
Distribution fee  
Class C

25,766
Custody and accounting fees

10,977
Professional fees

37,877
Registration fees

108,936
Shareholder report expenses

57,777
Trustees’ fees and expenses

21,080
Other fees and expenses

46,498
Total expenses

2,172,810
Less: Fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements  
Fund-level

(579,503)
Class A

(130,239)
Class C

(1,038)
Administrator Class

(11,239)
Net expenses

1,450,791
Net investment income

1,435,966
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments  
Net realized gains on securities transactions allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

29,216,420
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on securities transactions allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

204,433,580
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

233,650,000
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

$235,085,966
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

14  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund


Statement of changes in net assets
         
  Year ended
May 31, 2021
Year ended
May 31, 2020
Operations        
Net investment income

  $ 1,435,966   $ 2,260,170
Net realized gains (losses) on investments

  29,216,420   (36,100,494)
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

  204,433,580   (40,806,657)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations

  235,085,966   (74,646,981)
Distributions to shareholders from        
Net investment income and net realized gains        
Class A

  (1,293,657)   (1,775,108)
Class C

  0   (20,482)
Class R6

  (57,563)   (57,654)
Administrator Class

  (111,552)   (132,559)
Institutional Class

  (291,793)   (389,037)
Total distributions to shareholders

  (1,754,565)   (2,374,840)
Capital share transactions Shares   Shares  
Proceeds from shares sold        
Class A

941,668 26,856,731 660,800 16,227,538
Class C

13,195 384,992 9,961 227,898
Class R6

191,063 5,140,970 64,570 1,642,037
Administrator Class

324,601 9,607,503 106,132 2,470,380
Institutional Class

788,867 24,838,642 309,975 7,352,769
    66,828,838   27,920,622
Reinvestment of distributions        
Class A

44,468 1,263,434 61,791 1,738,175
Class C

0 0 745 18,543
Class R6

1,957 57,318 1,984 57,454
Administrator Class

3,678 106,887 4,358 125,424
Institutional Class

9,851 287,148 13,253 382,205
    1,714,787   2,321,801
Payment for shares redeemed        
Class A

(2,387,672) (63,689,654) (1,647,283) (40,312,932)
Class C

(149,932) (3,213,714) (150,237) (3,268,340)
Class R6

(258,998) (7,165,322) (949,988) (24,922,236)
Administrator Class

(194,898) (5,830,131) (185,643) (4,423,218)
Institutional Class

(472,719) (13,399,558) (876,293) (21,210,870)
    (93,298,379)   (94,137,596)
Net asset value of shares issued in acquisition        
Class A

0 0 12,989,900 337,017,442
Class C

0 0 328,733 7,545,278
Class R6

0 0 1,155,117 30,863,882
Administrator Class

0 0 242,559 6,444,855
Institutional Class

0 0 786,790 20,969,975
    0   402,841,432
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from capital share transactions

  (24,754,754)   338,946,259
Total increase in net assets

  208,576,647   261,924,438
Net assets        
Beginning of period

  322,676,101   60,751,663
End of period

  $531,252,748   $322,676,101
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund  |  15


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class A 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$20.91 $24.22 $28.60 $24.01 $20.22
Net investment income

0.09 0.18 1 0.09 0.09 0.05
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

16.22 (3.35) (4.31) 4.58 3.75
Total from investment operations

16.31 (3.17) (4.22) 4.67 3.80
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.11) (0.14) (0.16) (0.08) (0.01)
Net asset value, end of period

$37.11 $20.91 $24.22 $28.60 $24.01
Total return2

77.80% (13.25)% (14.72)% 19.48% 18.86%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

1.32% 1.32% 1.49% 1.47% 1.47%
Net expenses

1.14% 1.13% 1.15% 1.33% 1.35%
Net investment income

0.33% 0.74% 0.38% 0.46% 0.20%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate3

62% 78% 168% 144% 110%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$414,013 $262,574 $11,902 $15,665 $16,280
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.74%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.74%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.75%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.84%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.84%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges.
3 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

16  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class C 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$18.43 $21.48 $25.38 $21.40 $18.15
Net investment income (loss)

(0.07) 1 0.01 1 (0.08) 1 (0.07) 1 (0.11) 1
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

14.33 (3.00) (3.82) 4.05 3.36
Total from investment operations

14.26 (2.99) (3.90) 3.98 3.25
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

0.00 (0.06) 0.00 0.00 0.00
Net asset value, end of period

$32.69 $18.43 $21.48 $25.38 $21.40
Total return2

76.80% (13.98)% (15.37)% 18.60% 17.97%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

2.06% 2.08% 2.22% 2.21% 2.22%
Net expenses

1.90% 1.90% 1.90% 2.08% 2.10%
Net investment income (loss)

(0.29)% 0.02% (0.35)% (0.29)% (0.54)%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate3

62% 78% 168% 144% 110%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$3,388 $4,431 $1,099 $1,980 $1,962
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.74%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.74%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.75%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.84%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.84%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges.
3 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund  |  17


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class R6 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 1
Net asset value, beginning of period

$21.56 $24.92 $29.44 $24.69 $21.37
Net investment income

0.20 0.31 0.21 2 0.29 2 0.08
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

16.78 (3.50) (4.45) 4.65 3.33
Total from investment operations

16.98 (3.19) (4.24) 4.94 3.41
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.21) (0.17) (0.28) (0.19) (0.09)
Net asset value, end of period

$38.33 $21.56 $24.92 $29.44 $24.69
Total return3

78.63% (12.97)% (14.38)% 20.03% 15.95%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

0.89% 0.90% 1.09% 1.03% 1.02%
Net expenses

0.75% 0.75% 0.75% 0.88% 0.90%
Net investment income

0.73% 1.22% 0.77% 1.04% 0.58%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate4

62% 78% 168% 144% 110%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$9,007 $6,491 $731 $322 $29
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.74%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.74%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.75%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.84%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.83%
    
1 For the period from October 31, 2016 (commencement of class operations) to May 31, 2017
2 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
3 Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.
4 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

18  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Administrator Class 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$21.40 $24.80 $29.23 $24.53 $20.66
Net investment income

0.10 1 0.21 1 0.14 1 0.20 0.08 1
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

16.62 (3.43) (4.43) 4.63 3.83
Total from investment operations

16.72 (3.22) (4.29) 4.83 3.91
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.14) (0.18) (0.14) (0.13) (0.04)
Net asset value, end of period

$37.98 $21.40 $24.80 $29.23 $24.53
Total return

77.91% (13.18)% (14.65)% 19.71% 19.00%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

1.24% 1.32% 1.35% 1.38% 1.39%
Net expenses

1.05% 1.05% 1.05% 1.19% 1.20%
Net investment income

0.35% 0.82% 0.49% 0.59% 0.36%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate2

62% 78% 168% 144% 110%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$32,721 $15,581 $13,905 $60,379 $57,591
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.74%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.74%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.75%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.84%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.84%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund  |  19


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Institutional Class 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$21.46 $24.86 $29.40 $24.68 $20.77
Net investment income

0.15 1 0.25 0.19 1 0.21 0.11
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

16.70 (3.43) (4.45) 4.69 3.89
Total from investment operations

16.85 (3.18) (4.26) 4.90 4.00
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.18) (0.22) (0.28) (0.18) (0.09)
Net asset value, end of period

$38.13 $21.46 $24.86 $29.40 $24.68
Total return

78.39% (13.03)% (14.46)% 19.90% 13.70%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

0.99% 1.07% 1.14% 1.14% 1.14%
Net expenses

0.85% 0.85% 0.85% 0.99% 1.00%
Net investment income

0.52% 1.04% 0.68% 0.78% 0.55%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate2

62% 78% 168% 144% 110%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$72,123 $33,600 $33,116 $60,973 $52,072
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.74%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.74%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.75%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.84%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.84%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

20  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund


Notes to financial statements
1. ORGANIZATION
Wells Fargo Funds Trust (the "Trust"), a Delaware statutory trust organized on March 10, 1999, is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). As an investment company, the Trust follows the accounting and reporting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, Financial Services – Investment Companies. These financial statements report on the Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund (the "Fund") which is a diversified series of the Trust.
The Fund is a feeder fund in a master-feeder structure that invests substantially all of its assets in a single master portfolio with a substantially identical investment objective and substantially similar investment strategies. The Fund invests in Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio, a separate diversified portfolio (the “affiliated Master Portfolio”) of Wells Fargo Master Trust, a registered open-end management investment company. As of May 31, 2021, the Fund owned 85.41% of Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio. The affiliated Master Portfolio directly acquires portfolio securities and the Fund acquires an indirect interest in those securities. The Fund accounts for its investment in the affiliated Master Portfolio as a partnership investment and records on a daily basis its share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s income, expense and realized and unrealized gains and losses. The financial statements of the affiliated Master Portfolio for the year ended May 31, 2021 are included in this report and should be read in conjunction with the Fund’s financial statements.
On February 23, 2021, Wells Fargo & Company announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management ("WFAM") to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. WFAM is the trade name used by the asset management businesses of Wells Fargo & Company and includes Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the investment manager to the Fund, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, both registered investment advisers providing sub-advisory services to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Fund's principal underwriter. As part of the transaction, Wells Fargo & Company will own a 9.9% equity interest and will continue to serve as an important client and distribution partner.
Consummation of the transaction will result in the automatic termination of the Fund's investment management agreement and subadvisory agreement. The Fund's Board of Trustees approved a new investment management and new subadvisory agreement and approved submitting the agreements to the Fund’s shareholders for approval at a special meeting of shareholders expected to be held on August 16, 2021. Shareholders of record of the Fund at the close of business on May 28, 2021 are entitled to vote at the meeting. If shareholders approve the new agreements, they would take effect upon the closing of the transaction. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
This shareholder report is not asking you for a proxy. A separate proxy statement with more detailed information about the transaction will be provided to Fund shareholders and should be reviewed carefully.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following significant accounting policies, which are consistently followed in the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund, are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Securities valuation
All investments are valued each business day as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4 p.m. Eastern Time), although the Fund may deviate from this calculation time under unusual or unexpected circumstances.
Investments in the affiliated Master Portfolio are valued daily based on the Fund’s proportionate share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s net assets, which are also valued daily. Securities held in the affiliated Master Portfolio are valued as discussed in the Notes to Financial Statements of the affiliated Master Portfolio, which are included elsewhere in this report.
Investments which are not valued using any of the methods discussed above are valued at their fair value, as determined in good faith by the Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees has established a Valuation Committee comprised of the Trustees and has delegated to it the authority to take any actions regarding the valuation of portfolio securities that the Valuation Committee deems necessary or appropriate, including determining the fair value of portfolio securities, unless the determination has been delegated to the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee at Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC ("Funds Management"). The Board of Trustees retains the authority to make or ratify any valuation decisions or approve any changes to the Valuation Procedures as it deems appropriate. On a quarterly basis, the Board of Trustees

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund  |  21


Notes to financial statements
receives reports on any valuation actions taken by the Valuation Committee or the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee which may include items for ratification.
Investment transactions, income and expenses
Investments in the affiliated Master Portfolio are recorded on a trade date basis. The Fund records daily its proportionate share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s income, expenses and realized and unrealized gains or losses. The Fund also accrues its own expenses.
Distributions to shareholders
Distributions to shareholders from net investment income and any net realized gains are recorded on the ex-dividend date and paid at least annually. Such distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations and may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Dividend sources are estimated at the time of declaration. The tax character of distributions is determined as of the Fund's fiscal year end. Therefore, a portion of the Fund's distributions made prior to the Fund’s fiscal year end may be categorized as a tax return of capital at year end.
Federal and other taxes
The Fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by distributing substantially all of its investment company taxable income and any net realized capital gains (after reduction for capital loss carryforwards) sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes. Accordingly, no provision for federal income taxes was required.
The Fund’s income and federal excise tax returns and all financial records supporting those returns for the prior three fiscal years are subject to examination by the federal and Delaware revenue authorities. Management has analyzed the Fund's tax positions taken on federal, state, and foreign tax returns for all open tax years and does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability.
As of May 31, 2021, the aggregate cost of all investments for federal income tax purposes was $370,833,600 and the unrealized gains (losses) consisted of:
Gross unrealized gains $172,445,677
Gross unrealized losses (13,731,085)
Net unrealized gains $158,714,592
As of May 31, 2021, the Fund had capital loss carryforwards which consisted of $5,786,220 in short-term capital losses.
As of May 31, 2021, the Fund had a qualified late-year ordinary loss of $475,078 which will be recognized on the first day of the following fiscal year.
Class allocations
The separate classes of shares offered by the Fund differ principally in applicable sales charges, distribution, shareholder servicing, and administration fees. Class specific expenses are charged directly to that share class. Investment income, common fund-level expenses, and realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative proportion of net assets of each class.
3. FAIR VALUATION MEASUREMENTS
At May 31, 2021, the Fund’s investment in an affiliated Master Portfolio was measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient. The investment objective and fair value of the affiliated Master Portfolio is as follows:
Affiliated Master Portfolio Investment objective Fair value of affiliated
Master Portfolio
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio Seek long-term capital appreciation $529,548,192
The affiliated Master Portfolio does not have a redemption period notice, can be redeemed daily and does not have any unfunded commitments.

22  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund


Notes to financial statements
4. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
Management fee
Funds Management, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company ("Wells Fargo"), is the manager of the Fund and provides advisory and fund-level administrative services under an investment management agreement. Under the investment management agreement, Funds Management is responsible for, among other services, implementing the investment objectives and strategies of the Fund and providing fund-level administrative services in connection with the Fund’s operations. As long as the Fund continues to invest substantially all of its assets in a single affiliated Master Portfolio, the Fund pays Funds Management an investment management fee only for fund-level administrative services at the following annual rate based on the Fund’s average daily net assets:
Average daily net assets Management fee
First $5 billion 0.050%
Next $5 billion 0.040
Over $10 billion 0.030
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the management fee was equivalent to an annual rate of 0.05% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
Funds Management also serves as the adviser to the affiliated Master Portfolio and is entitled to receive a fee from the affiliated Master Portfolio for those services.
Administration fees
Under a class-level administration agreement, Funds Management provides class-level administrative services to the Fund, which includes paying fees and expenses for services provided by the transfer agent, sub-transfer agents, omnibus account servicers and record-keepers. As compensation for its services under the class-level administration agreement, Funds Management receives an annual fee which is calculated based on the average daily net assets of each class as follows:
  Class-level
administration fee
Class A 0.21%
Class C 0.21
Class R6 0.03
Administrator Class 0.13
Institutional Class 0.13
Waivers and/or expense reimbursements
Funds Management has contractually waived and/or reimbursed management and administration fees to the extent necessary to maintain certain net operating expense ratios for the Fund. When each class of the Fund has exceeded its expense cap, Funds Management has waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses from fund-level expenses on a proportionate basis and then from class specific expenses. When only certain classes exceed their expense caps, waivers and/or reimbursements are applied against class specific expenses before fund-level expenses. Net expenses from the affiliated Master Portfolio are included in the expense caps. Funds Management has committed through September 30, 2021 to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap expenses. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. The contractual expense caps are as follows:

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund  |  23


Notes to financial statements
  Expense ratio caps
Class A 1.15%
Class C 1.90
Class R6 0.75
Administrator Class 1.05
Institutional Class 0.85
Distribution fee
The Trust has adopted a distribution plan for Class C shares of the Fund pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. A distribution fee is charged to Class C shares and paid to Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC ("Funds Distributor"), the principal underwriter, at an annual rate of 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class C shares.
In addition, Funds Distributor is entitled to receive the front-end sales charge from the purchase of Class A shares and a contingent deferred sales charge on the redemption of certain Class A shares. Funds Distributor is also entitled to receive the contingent deferred sales charges from redemptions of Class C shares. For the year ended May 31, 2021, Funds Distributor received $2,038 from the sale of Class A shares. No contingent deferred sales charges were incurred by Class A and Class C shares for the year ended May 31, 2021.
Shareholder servicing fees
The Trust has entered into contracts with one or more shareholder servicing agents, whereby Class A, Class C, and Administrator Class of the Fund are charged a fee at an annual rate of 0.25% of the average daily net assets of each respective class. A portion of these total shareholder servicing fees were paid to affiliates of Wells Fargo.
5. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS
The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing substantially all of its assets in a single affiliated Master Portfolio. Purchases and sales have been calculated by multiplying the Fund's ownership percentage of the affiliated Master Portfolio by the affiliated Master Portfolio's purchases and sales. Purchases and sales of investments, excluding U.S. government obligations (if any) and short-term securities, for the year ended May 31, 2021 were $252,835,028 and $306,280,875, respectively.
6. ACQUISITION
After the close of business on September 20, 2019, the Fund acquired the net assets of Wells Fargo Small Cap Value Fund. The purpose of the transaction was to combine two funds with similar investment objectives and strategies. Wells Fargo Small Cap Value Fund transferred all of its portfolio securities to Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio (a master portfolio in which it invested all of its assets) in exchange for interests in Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio. Immediately thereafter, Wells Fargo Small Cap Value Fund transferred all of its equity interests in Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio to Wells Fargo Small Cap Value Fund in exchange for shares of the Fund. Shareholders holding Class A, Class C, Class R6, Administrator Class, and Institutional Class shares of Wells Fargo Small Cap Value Fund received Class A, Class C, Class R6, Administrator Class, and Institutional Class shares, respectively, of the Fund in the reorganization. The acquisition was accomplished by a tax-free exchange of all of the shares of Wells Fargo Small Cap Value Fund for 15,503,099 shares of the Fund valued at $402,841,432 at an exchange ratio of 0.45, 0.28, 0.49, 0.49, and 0.49 for Class A, Class C, Class R6, Administrator Class and Institutional Class shares, respectively. The investment portfolio of Wells Fargo Small Cap Value Fund with a fair value of $399,448,746, identified cost of $378,004,130 and unrealized gains of $21,444,616 at September 20, 2019 were the principal assets acquired by the Fund. The aggregate net assets of Wells Fargo Small Cap Value Fund and the Fund immediately prior to the acquisition were $402,841,432 and $58,675,150, respectively. The aggregate net assets of the Fund immediately after the acquisition were $461,516,582. For financial reporting purposes, assets received and shares issued by the Fund were recorded at fair value; however, the cost basis of the investments received from Wells Fargo Small Cap Value Fund was carried forward to align with ongoing reporting of the Fund’s realized and unrealized gains and losses with amounts distributable to shareholders for tax purposes.
7. BANK BORROWINGS
The Trust (excluding the money market funds), Wells Fargo Master Trust and Wells Fargo Variable Trust are parties to a $350,000,000 revolving credit agreement whereby the Fund is permitted to use bank borrowings for temporary or emergency purposes, such as to fund shareholder redemption requests. Interest under the credit agreement is charged to the Fund based

24  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund


Notes to financial statements
on a borrowing rate equal to the higher of the Federal Funds rate in effect on that day plus 1.25% or the overnight LIBOR rate in effect on that day plus 1.25%. In addition, an annual commitment fee equal to 0.25% of the unused balance is allocated to each participating fund.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, there were no borrowings by the Fund under the agreement.
8. DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS
The tax character of distributions paid was $1,754,565 and $2,374,840 of ordinary income for the years ended May 31, 2021 and May 31, 2020, respectively.
As of May 31, 2021, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Unrealized
gains
Late-year
ordinary
losses
deferred
Capital loss
carryforward
$158,714,592 $(475,078) $(5,786,220)
9. INDEMNIFICATION
Under the Fund's organizational documents, the officers and Trustees have been granted certain indemnification rights against certain liabilities that may arise out of performance of their duties to the Fund. The Fund has entered into a separate agreement with each Trustee that converts indemnification rights currently existing under the Fund’s organizational documents into contractual rights that cannot be changed in the future without the consent of the Trustee. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with service providers that contain a variety of indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent on future claims that may be made against the Fund and, therefore, cannot be estimated.
10. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
In August 2018, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 updates the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Management has adopted this guidance which did not have a material impact on the financial statements.
11. CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization announced that it had made the assessment that coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) is a pandemic. The impacts of COVID-19 are affecting the entire global economy, individual companies and investment products, the funds, and the market in general. There is significant uncertainty around the extent and duration of business disruptions related to COVID-19 and the impacts may last for an extended period of time. COVID-19 has led to significant uncertainty and volatility in the financial markets.
12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
At a meeting held July 15, 2021, the Board of Trustees of the Wells Fargo Funds approved a change in the Fund's name to remove “Wells Fargo” from the Fund's name and replace with “Allspring”. The change is expected to go into effect on October 11, 2021.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) announced that it will be changing its company name to Allspring Global Investments upon the closing of the previously announced sale transaction of WFAM by Wells Fargo & Company to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. The new corporate name is expected to go into effect on the closing date of the transaction, which is anticipated to occur in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
Following the closing of the transaction, Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the Fund's investment manager, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, each sub-advisers to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Fund's principal underwriter, will each be rebranded as Allspring.

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund  |  25


Report of independent registered public accounting firm
To the Shareholders of the Fund and Board of Trustees
Wells Fargo Funds Trust:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund (the Fund), one of the funds constituting Wells Fargo Funds Trust, including the portfolio of investments, as of May 31, 2021, the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the financial statements) and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended. In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of May 31, 2021, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Fund in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and financial highlights, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. Such procedures also included confirmation of securities owned as of May 31, 2021, by correspondence with the transfer agent. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and financial highlights. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have not been able to determine the specific year that we began serving as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies; however, we are aware that we have served as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies since at least 1955.
Boston, Massachusetts
July 28, 2021

26  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Common stocks:  99.00%          
Communication services:  0.72%          
Entertainment: 0.72%           
Cinemark Holdings Incorporated         198,557 $  4,499,302
Consumer discretionary:  18.88%          
Auto components: 1.81%           
Dana Incorporated                 219,467   5,954,140
Patrick Industries Incorporated                  61,782   5,294,717
           11,248,857
Diversified consumer services: 0.68%           
H&R Block Incorporated         168,833   4,190,435
Hotels, restaurants & leisure: 3.81%           
Dave & Buster's Entertainment Incorporated                 115,610   4,887,991
Del Taco Restaurants Incorporated                 246,119   2,500,569
Denny’s Corporation                 254,676   4,477,204
Dine Brands Global Incorporated                  60,902   5,782,645
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Incorporated                  79,787   5,988,812
           23,637,221
Household durables: 3.39%           
Beazer Homes Incorporated                 211,655   5,039,506
GoPro Incorporated Class A                 330,032   3,702,959
Green Brick Partners Incorporated                 126,658   2,956,198
Hamilton Beach Brand Class A                  65,132   1,641,326
Hooker Furniture Corporation                 145,826   5,227,862
iRobot Corporation †«       25,192 2,461,258
          21,029,109
Internet & direct marketing retail: 0.49%           
Stamps.com Incorporated       16,020 3,006,634
Leisure products: 1.34%           
Johnson Outdoors Incorporated Class A       37,935 4,635,278
Malibu Boats Incorporated Class A       46,843 3,673,428
          8,308,706
Multiline retail: 1.49%           
Big Lots Stores Incorporated       78,147 4,762,278
Nordstrom Incorporated       133,883 4,490,436
          9,252,714
Specialty retail: 4.25%           
American Eagle Outfitters Incorporated       208,088 7,372,558
Dick's Sporting Goods Incorporated       71,190 6,943,161
Shoe Carnival Incorporated       96,420 6,509,314
Urban Outfitters Incorporated       140,805 5,513,924
          26,338,957
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio  |  27


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Textiles, apparel & luxury goods: 1.62%           
Lakeland Industries Incorporated †«                 128,624 $   3,243,897
Rocky Brands Incorporated                 116,484   6,793,347
           10,037,244
Energy:  4.73%          
Energy equipment & services: 2.02%           
Helmerich & Payne Incorporated                 214,472   6,058,834
Patterson-UTI Energy Incorporated                 772,661   6,467,173
           12,526,007
Oil, gas & consumable fuels: 2.71%           
Diamondback Energy Incorporated                  85,684   6,860,718
Southwestern Energy Company               1,148,156   5,935,967
W&T Offshore Incorporated               1,071,392   4,007,006
           16,803,691
Financials:  23.19%          
Banks: 17.13%           
Ameris Bancorp                 148,524   8,159,909
Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation                 200,959   8,243,338
Banc of California Incorporated                 231,526   4,054,020
Banner Corporation                 110,877   6,489,631
Customers Bancorp Incorporated                 187,980   7,115,043
FB Financial Corporation                 135,250   5,660,213
First Foundation Incorporated                 228,393   5,732,664
First Interstate BancSystem Class A                 133,672   6,291,941
Great Southern Bancorp Incorporated       81,413 4,599,020
Heritage Financial Corporation       197,505 5,729,620
Independent Bank Corporation       152,412 3,551,200
Midland States Bancorp Incorporated       159,609 4,446,707
OceanFirst Financial Corporation       233,270 5,157,600
OFG Bancorp       241,527 5,820,801
Synovus Financial Corporation       172,249 8,460,871
Umpqua Holdings Corporation       337,423 6,438,031
Univest Corporation of Pennsylvania       177,699 5,181,703
Western Alliance Bancorp       50,972 5,097,710
          106,230,022
Capital markets: 1.13%           
Piper Jaffray Companies Incorporated       54,676 6,969,003
Insurance: 1.91%           
American Equity Investment Life Holding Company       141,040 4,301,720
Horace Mann Educators Corporation       59,191 2,359,945
State Auto Financial Corporation       128,809 2,434,490
United Fire Group Incorporated       89,335 2,738,118
          11,834,273
Mortgage REITs: 0.32%           
Capstead Mortgage Corporation       307,499 1,983,369
Thrifts & mortgage finance: 2.70%           
Axos Financial Incorporated       124,229 5,889,697
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

28  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Thrifts & mortgage finance (continued)          
Homestreet Incorporated                 124,655 $   5,611,968
Walker & Dunlop Incorporated                  51,680   5,247,587
           16,749,252
Health care:  6.04%          
Biotechnology: 0.08%           
Eagle Pharmaceuticals Incorporated          12,575     498,222
Health care equipment & supplies: 2.58%           
AngioDynamics Incorporated                 215,204   4,975,516
ICU Medical Incorporated                  19,198   3,994,336
Integer Holdings Corporation                  27,691   2,505,205
Merit Medical Systems Incorporated                  75,094   4,531,172
           16,006,229
Health care providers & services: 2.66%           
AMN Healthcare Services Incorporated                  52,324   4,641,139
Brookdale Senior Living Incorporated                 620,593   4,182,797
Five Star Senior Living Incorporated                  46,765     281,058
Option Care Health Incorporated                 171,943   3,153,435
The Ensign Group Incorporated                  50,343   4,188,538
           16,446,967
Health care technology: 0.43%           
Computer Programs & Systems Incorporated          82,858   2,682,113
Pharmaceuticals: 0.29%           
Phibro Animal Health Corporation Class A          63,750   1,797,113
Industrials:  19.77%          
Air freight & logistics: 0.50%           
Radiant Logistics Incorporated       402,994 3,099,024
Airlines: 1.31%           
Alaska Air Group Incorporated       63,970 4,426,724
SkyWest Incorporated       74,984 3,676,466
          8,103,190
Building products: 1.20%           
American Woodmark Corporation       50,304 4,372,424
CSW Industrials Incorporated       25,088 3,056,220
          7,428,644
Commercial services & supplies: 2.89%           
ABM Industries Incorporated       111,173 5,546,421
BrightView Holdings Incorporated       50,789 881,189
Healthcare Services Group Incorporated       143,008 4,288,810
Herman Miller Incorporated       150,510 7,194,378
          17,910,798
Construction & engineering: 3.71%           
Comfort Systems Incorporated       70,836 5,872,304
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company       270,395 3,950,471
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio  |  29


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Construction & engineering (continued)          
MYR Group Incorporated                  83,061 $   7,229,629
Northwest Pipe Company                  75,766   2,398,752
Sterling Construction Company Incorporated                 157,556   3,545,010
           22,996,166
Electrical equipment: 1.40%           
Atkore International Incorporated                  43,144   3,330,717
Encore Wire Corporation                  16,835   1,383,837
Regal-Beloit Corporation                  28,011   3,984,005
            8,698,559
Machinery: 5.70%           
Columbus McKinnon Corporation                  78,794   3,994,856
Federal Signal Corporation                 106,861   4,539,455
Hillenbrand Incorporated                 109,332   4,985,539
Kadant Incorporated                  27,881   4,684,566
Lydall Incorporated                  93,130   3,388,069
Miller Industries Incorporated                  99,750   4,174,538
Rexnord Corporation                  78,682   3,931,740
The Shyft Group Incorporated                 145,100   5,655,998
           35,354,761
Professional services: 1.36%           
CBIZ Incorporated                 112,449   3,734,431
Kelly Services Incorporated Class A                 173,162   4,445,069
Mastech Digital Incorporated                  17,061     268,881
          8,448,381
Road & rail: 1.03%           
Arcbest Corporation       81,864 6,372,294
Trading companies & distributors: 0.67%           
CAI International Incorporated       97,550 4,186,846
Information technology:  9.47%          
Communications equipment: 0.39%           
Netgear Incorporated       62,543 2,431,672
Electronic equipment, instruments & components: 3.41%           
ePlus Incorporated       30,648 2,898,381
Insight Enterprises Incorporated       60,566 6,327,936
Methode Electronics Incorporated       126,990 6,143,776
PC Connection Incorporated       56,578 2,760,441
Sanmina Corporation       71,854 3,025,772
          21,156,306
IT services: 2.43%           
BM Technologies Incorporated †«       14,700 188,895
BM Technologies Incorporated (Acquired 1-14-2021, cost $363,151) ♦†£       29,106 374,012
Conduent Incorporated       752,034 5,700,418
TTEC Holdings Incorporated       31,605 3,426,298
Unisys Corporation       208,379 5,357,424
          15,047,047
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

30  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Semiconductors & semiconductor equipment: 2.60%           
Cirrus Logic Incorporated                  38,630 $   3,015,844
Diodes Incorporated                  35,980   2,722,607
FormFactor Incorporated                  61,413   2,164,808
Ichor Holdings Limited                  75,304   4,236,603
Onto Innovation Incorporated                  54,950   3,943,762
           16,083,624
Technology hardware, storage & peripherals: 0.64%           
NCR Corporation          82,829   3,992,358
Materials:  8.46%          
Chemicals: 3.84%           
Advansix Incorporated                  71,421   2,261,189
American Vanguard Corporation                  39,190     720,704
Hawkins Incorporated                 130,332   4,433,895
Ingevity Corporation                  57,519   4,734,389
Minerals Technologies Incorporated                  84,186   7,324,182
Stepan Company                  32,463   4,371,468
           23,845,827
Construction materials: 0.95%           
Eagle Materials Incorporated          40,194   5,898,871
Containers & packaging: 0.45%           
UFP Technologies Incorporated          50,838   2,767,621
Metals & mining: 3.22%           
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation                  47,801   6,184,971
Schnitzer Steel Industries Incorporated Class A       157,293 8,569,312
United States Steel Corporation       200,401 5,196,398
          19,950,681
Real estate:  7.74%          
Equity REITs: 7.74%           
Agree Realty Corporation       45,564 3,202,238
American Campus Communities Incorporated       72,079 3,399,246
Armada Hoffler Properties Incorporated       256,900 3,409,063
Centerspace REIT       41,457 2,951,324
Global Medical REIT Incorporated       202,565 2,916,936
Independence Realty Trust Incorporated       203,501 3,475,797
Lexington Corporate Properties Trust       255,087 3,157,977
Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation       150,876 2,842,504
One Liberty Properties Incorporated       126,303 3,227,042
Outfront Media Incorporated       151,214 3,620,063
PotlatchDeltic Corporation       56,199 3,383,180
Retail Opportunity Investment Corporation       161,224 2,879,461
RLJ Lodging Trust       211,436 3,249,771
STAG Industrial Incorporated       91,334 3,261,537
Summit Hotel Properties Incorporated       314,354 3,020,942
          47,997,081
Total Common stocks (Cost $393,582,107)         613,845,191
    
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio  |  31


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

      Expiration
date
Shares Value
Warrants:  0.00%          
Energy:  0.00%          
Energy equipment & services:  0.00%          
Parker Drilling Company ♦†     9-16-2024     8,457 $          0
Total Warrants (Cost $0)                   0
    
    Yield      
Short-term investments:  1.21%          
Investment companies:  1.21%          
Securities Lending Cash Investments LLC ♠∩∞   0.03%           1,657,815   1,657,815
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class ♠∞   0.03   5,823,369   5,823,369
Total Short-term investments (Cost $7,481,184)           7,481,184
Total investments in securities (Cost $401,063,291) 100.21%       621,326,375
Other assets and liabilities, net (0.21)        (1,303,709)
Total net assets 100.00%       $620,022,666
    
Non-income-earning security
The security is fair valued in accordance with procedures approved by the Board of Trustees.
£ Restricted security as to resale, excluding Rule 144A securities. The Fund held restricted securities with an aggregate current value of $374,012 (original aggregate cost of $363,151), representing 0.06% of its net assets as of period end.
« All or a portion of this security is on loan.
The issuer is an affiliate of the Portfolio as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The investment is a non-registered investment company purchased with cash collateral received from securities on loan.
The rate represents the 7-day annualized yield at period end.
    
Abbreviations:
REIT Real estate investment trust
Investments in affiliates
An affiliated investment is an investment in which the Portfolio owns at least 5% of the outstanding voting shares of the issuer or as a result of other relationships, such as the Portfolio and the issuer having the same adviser or investment manager. Transactions with issuers that were either affiliates of the Portfolio at the beginning of the period or the end of the period were as follows:
  Value,
beginning of
period
Purchases Sales
proceeds
Net
realized
gains
(losses)
  Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses)
  Value,
end of
period
  % of
net
assets
Shares,
end
of period
Income
from
affiliated
securities
Short-term investments                        
Investment companies                        
Securities Lending Cash Investments LLC $ 0 $88,812,100 $(87,154,285) $0   $0   $ 1,657,815     1,657,815 $ 5,302#
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class 2,323,207 91,273,174 (87,773,012) 0   0   5,823,369     5,823,369 1,860
        $0   $0   $7,481,184   1.21%   $7,162
    
# Amount shown represents income before fees and rebates.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

32  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio


Statement of assets and liabilities—May 31, 2021
   
Assets  
Investments in unaffiliated securities (including $1,618,471 of securities loaned), at value (cost $393,582,107)

$ 613,845,191
Investments in affiliated securites, at value (cost $7,481,184)

7,481,184
Receivable for investments sold

2,758,234
Receivable for dividends

336,351
Receivable for securities lending income, net

864
Prepaid expenses and other assets

96,703
Total assets

624,518,527
Liabilities  
Payable for investments purchased

2,461,770
Payable upon receipt of securities loaned

1,657,815
Advisory fee payable

373,249
Accrued expenses and other liabilities

3,027
Total liabilities

4,495,861
Total net assets

$620,022,666
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio  |  33


Statement of operations—year ended May 31, 2021
   
Investment income  
Dividends (net of foreign withholdings taxes of $6,904)

$ 7,052,712
Income from affiliated securities

44,047
Total investment income

7,096,759
Expenses  
Advisory fee

3,905,881
Custody and accounting fees

32,965
Professional fees

48,336
Interest holder report expenses

19,327
Trustees’ fees and expenses

19,192
Other fees and expenses

12,018
Total expenses

4,037,719
Less: Fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements

(417,661)
Net expenses

3,620,058
Net investment income

3,476,701
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments  
Net realized gains on investments

37,164,709
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

242,793,164
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

279,957,873
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

$283,434,574
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

34  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio


Statement of changes in net assets
     
  Year ended
May 31, 2021
Year ended
May 31, 2020
Operations    
Net investment income

$ 3,476,701 $ 4,223,447
Net realized gains (losses) on investments

37,164,709 (50,607,316)
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

242,793,164 (40,450,997)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations

283,434,574 (86,834,866)
Capital transactions    
Transactions in investors’ beneficial interests    
Contributions

44,706,834 464,639,096
Withdrawals

(109,788,132) (103,765,259)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from capital transactions

(65,081,298) 360,873,837
Total increase in net assets

218,353,276 274,038,971
Net assets    
Beginning of period

401,669,390 127,630,419
End of period

$ 620,022,666 $ 401,669,390
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio  |  35


Financial highlights
  Year ended May 31
  2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Total return

78.76% (13.74)% (14.51)% 20.10% 19.44%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)          
Gross expenses

0.83% 0.82% 0.86% 0.85% 0.84%
Net expenses1

0.74% 0.74% 0.75% 0.84% 0.84%
Net investment income

0.71% 1.15% 0.80% 0.87% 0.72%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate

62% 78% 168% 144% 110%
    
1 Net expense ratios reflect voluntary waivers.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

36  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio


Notes to financial statements
1. ORGANIZATION
Wells Fargo Master Trust (the "Trust"), a Delaware statutory trust organized on March 10, 1999, is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). As an investment company, the Trust follows the accounting and reporting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, Financial Services – Investment Companies. These financial statements report on the Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio (the "Portfolio") which is a diversified series of the Trust.
Interests in the Portfolio are available solely through private placement transactions that do not involve any "public offering" within the meaning of Section 4(2) of the Investment Company Act of 1933.
On February 23, 2021, Wells Fargo & Company announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management ("WFAM") to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. WFAM is the trade name used by the asset management businesses of Wells Fargo & Company and includes Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the adviser to the Portfolio, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, both registered investment advisers providing sub-advisory services to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Portfolio's principal underwriter. As part of the transaction, Wells Fargo & Company will own a 9.9% equity interest and will continue to serve as an important client and distribution partner.
Consummation of the transaction will result in the automatic termination of the Portfolio's advisory agreement and subadvisory agreement. The Portfolio's Board of Trustees approved a new advisory and new subadvisory agreement and approved submitting the agreements to the Portfolio’s interest holders for approval at a special meeting of interest holders expected to be held on August 16, 2021. Interest holders of record of the Portfolio at the close of business on May 28, 2021 are entitled to vote at the meeting. If interest holders approve the new agreements, they would take effect upon the closing of the transaction. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following significant accounting policies, which are consistently followed in the preparation of the financial statements of the Portfolio, are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Securities valuation
All investments are valued each business day as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4 p.m. Eastern Time), although the Portfolio may deviate from this calculation time under unusual or unexpected circumstances.
Equity securities that are listed on a foreign or domestic exchange or market are valued at the official closing price or, if none, the last sales price. If no sale occurs on the principal exchange or market that day, a fair value price will be determined in accordance with the Portfolio’s Valuation Procedures.
Investments in registered open-end investment companies are valued at net asset value. Interests in non-registered investment companies that are redeemable at net asset value are fair valued normally at net asset value.
Investments which are not valued using any of the methods discussed above are valued at their fair value, as determined in good faith by the Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees has established a Valuation Committee comprised of the Trustees and has delegated to it the authority to take any actions regarding the valuation of portfolio securities that the Valuation Committee deems necessary or appropriate, including determining the fair value of portfolio securities, unless the determination has been delegated to the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee at Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC ("Funds Management"). The Board of Trustees retains the authority to make or ratify any valuation decisions or approve any changes to the Valuation Procedures as it deems appropriate. On a quarterly basis, the Board of Trustees receives reports on any valuation actions taken by the Valuation Committee or the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee which may include items for ratification.
Securities lending
The Portfolio may lend its securities from time to time in order to earn additional income in the form of fees or interest on securities received as collateral or the investment of any cash received as collateral. When securities are on loan, the Portfolio receives interest or dividends on those securities. Cash collateral received in connection with its securities lending transactions is invested in Securities Lending Cash Investments, LLC (the “Securities Lending Fund”). Investments in Securities Lending Fund

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio  |  37


Notes to financial statements
are valued at the evaluated bid price provided by an independent pricing service. Income earned from investment in the Securities Lending Fund (net of fees and rebates), if any, is included in income from affiliated securities on the Statement of Operations.
In a securities lending transaction, the net asset value of the Portfolio is affected by an increase or decrease in the value of the securities loaned and by an increase or decrease in the value of the instrument in which collateral is invested. The amount of securities lending activity undertaken by the Portfolio fluctuates from time to time. The Portfolio has the right under the lending agreement to recover the securities from the borrower on demand. In the event of default or bankruptcy by the borrower, the Portfolio may be prevented from recovering the loaned securities or gaining access to the collateral or may experience delays or costs in doing so. In such an event, the terms of the agreement allow the unaffiliated securities lending agent to use the collateral to purchase replacement securities on behalf of the Portfolio or pay the Portfolio the market value of the loaned securities. The Portfolio bears the risk of loss with respect to depreciation of its investment of the cash collateral.
Security transactions and income recognition
Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains or losses are recorded on the basis of identified cost.
Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date. Dividend income is recorded net of foreign taxes withheld where recovery of such taxes is not assured.
Federal and other taxes
The Portfolio is not required to pay federal income taxes on its net investment income and net capital gains as it is treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. All income, gains and losses of the Portfolio are deemed to have been “passed through” to the interest holders in proportion to their holdings of the Portfolio regardless of whether income and gains have been distributed by the Portfolio.
The Portfolio’s income tax returns and all financial records supporting those returns for the prior three fiscal years are subject to examination by the federal revenue authority. Management has analyzed the Portfolio’s tax positions taken on federal, state, and foreign tax returns for all open tax years and does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability.
As of May 31, 2021, the aggregate cost of all investments for federal income tax purposes was $412,906,897 and the unrealized gains (losses) consisted of:
Gross unrealized gains $222,171,137
Gross unrealized losses (13,751,659)
Net unrealized gains $208,419,478
3. FAIR VALUATION MEASUREMENTS
Fair value measurements of investments are determined within a framework that has established a fair value hierarchy based upon the various data inputs utilized in determining the value of the Portfolio’s investments. The three-level hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The Portfolio’s investments are classified within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The inputs are summarized into three broad levels as follows:
Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical securities
Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Portfolio’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs or methodologies used for valuing investments in securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.

38  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio


Notes to financial statements
The following is a summary of the inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s assets and liabilities as of May 31, 2021:
  Quoted prices
(Level 1)
Other significant
observable inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
unobservable inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Assets        
Investments in:        
Common stocks        
Communication services $ 4,499,302 $ 0 $0 $ 4,499,302
Consumer discretionary 117,049,877 0 0 117,049,877
Energy 29,329,698 0 0 29,329,698
Financials 143,765,919 0 0 143,765,919
Health care 37,430,644 0 0 37,430,644
Industrials 122,598,663 0 0 122,598,663
Information technology 58,336,995 374,012 0 58,711,007
Materials 52,463,000 0 0 52,463,000
Real estate 47,997,081 0 0 47,997,081
Warrants        
Energy 0 0 0 0
Short-term investments        
Investment companies 7,481,184 0 0 7,481,184
Total assets $620,952,363 $374,012 $0 $621,326,375
Additional sector, industry or geographic detail, if any, is included in the Portfolio of Investments.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the Portfolio did not have any transfers into/out of Level 3.
4. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
Advisory fee
The Trust has entered into an advisory contract with Funds Management, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company ("Wells Fargo"). The adviser is responsible for implementing investment policies and guidelines and for supervising the subadviser, who is responsible for day-to-day portfolio management of the Portfolio. Pursuant to the contract, Funds Management is entitled to receive an advisory fee at the following annual rate based on the Portfolio’s average daily net assets:
Average daily net assets Advisory fee
First $500 million 0.800%
Next $500 million 0.775
Next $1 billion 0.750
Next $1 billion 0.725
Next $1 billion 0.700
Over $4 billion 0.680
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the advisory fee was equivalent to an annual rate of 0.80% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets.
Funds Management has retained the services of a subadviser to provide daily portfolio management to the Portfolio. The fee for subadvisory services is borne by Funds Management. Wells Capital Management Incorporated ("WellsCap"), an affiliate of Funds Management and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo, is the subadviser to the Portfolio and is entitled to receive a fee from Funds Management at an annual rate starting at 0.55% and declining to 0.40% as the average daily net assets of the Portfolio increase.
Funds Management has voluntarily waived and/or reimbursed advisory fees to reduce the net operating expense ratio of the Portfolio. These voluntary waivers may be discontinued at any time.

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio  |  39


Notes to financial statements
Interfund transactions
The Portfolio may purchase or sell portfolio investment securities to certain other Wells Fargo affiliates pursuant to Rule 17a-7 under the 1940 Act and under procedures adopted by the Board of Trustees. The procedures have been designed to ensure that these interfund transactions, which do not incur broker commissions, are effected at current market prices.
5. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS
Purchases and sales of investments, excluding U.S. government obligations (if any) and short-term securities, for the year ended May 31, 2021 were $296,032,450 and $358,609,637, respectively.
6. SECURITIES LENDING TRANSACTIONS
The Portfolio lends its securities through an unaffiliated securities lending agent and receives collateral in the form of cash or securities with a value at least equal to the value of the securities on loan. The value of the loaned securities is determined at the close of each business day and any increases or decreases in the required collateral are exchanged between the Portfolio and the counterparty on the next business day. Cash collateral received is invested in the Securities Lending Fund which seeks to provide a positive return compared to the daily Federal Funds Open Rate by investing in high-quality, U.S. dollar-denominated short-term money market instruments and is exempt from registration under Section 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act. Securities Lending Fund is managed by Funds Management and is subadvised by WellsCap. Funds Management receives an advisory fee starting at 0.05% and declining to 0.01% as the average daily net assets of the Securities Lending Fund increase. All of the fees received by Funds Management are paid to WellsCap for its services as subadviser.
In the event of counterparty default or the failure of a borrower to return a loaned security, the Portfolio has the right to use the collateral to offset any losses incurred. As of May 31, 2021, the Portfolio had securities lending transactions with the following counterparties which are subject to offset:
Counterparty Value of
securities on
loan
Collateral
received1
Net amount
JPMorgan Securities LLC 989,704 (989,704) 0
Bank of America Securities Incorporated 32,058 (32,058) 0
Morgan Stanley & Company LLC 139,329 (139,329) 0
Citigroup Global Markets Incorporated 223,068 (223,068) 0
UBS Securities LLC 234,312 (234,312) 0
1 Collateral received within this table is limited to the collateral for the net transaction with the counterparty.
7. BANK BORROWINGS
The Trust, along with Wells Fargo Variable Trust and Wells Fargo Funds Trust (excluding the money market funds), are parties to a $350,000,000 revolving credit agreement whereby the Portfolio is permitted to use bank borrowings for temporary or emergency purposes, such as to fund interest holders withdrawal requests. Interest under the credit agreement is charged to the Portfolio based on a borrowing rate equal to the higher of the Federal Funds rate in effect on that day plus 1.25% or the overnight LIBOR rate in effect on that day plus 1.25%. In addition, an annual commitment fee equal to 0.25% of the unused balance is allocated to each participating fund.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, there were no borrowings by the Portfolio under the agreement.
8. INDEMNIFICATION
Under the Portfolio's organizational documents, the officers and Trustees have been granted certain indemnification rights against certain liabilities that may arise out of performance of their duties to the Portfolio. The Portfolio has entered into a separate agreement with each Trustee that converts indemnification rights currently existing under the Portfolio’s organizational documents into contractual rights that cannot be changed in the future without the consent of the Trustee. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Portfolio may enter into contracts with service providers that contain a variety of indemnification clauses. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent on future claims that may be made against the Portfolio and, therefore, cannot be estimated.

40  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio


Notes to financial statements
9. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
In August 2018, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 updates the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Management has adopted this guidance which did not have a material impact on the financial statements.
10. CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization announced that it had made the assessment that coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) is a pandemic. The impacts of COVID-19 are affecting the entire global economy, individual companies and investment products, the funds, and the market in general. There is significant uncertainty around the extent and duration of business disruptions related to COVID-19 and the impacts may last for an extended period of time. COVID-19 has led to significant uncertainty and volatility in the financial markets.
11. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
At a meeting held July 15, 2021, the Board of Trustees of the Wells Fargo Funds approved a change in the Portfolio's name to remove “Wells Fargo” from the Portfolio's name and replace with “Allspring”. The change is expected to go into effect on October 11, 2021.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) announced that it will be changing its company name to Allspring Global Investments upon the closing of the previously announced sale transaction of WFAM by Wells Fargo & Company to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. The new corporate name is expected to go into effect on the closing date of the transaction, which is anticipated to occur in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
Following the closing of the transaction, Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the Portfolio's investment adviser, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, each sub-advisers to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC will each be rebranded as Allspring.

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio  |  41


Report of independent registered public accounting firm
To the Interest Holders of the Portfolio and Board of Trustees
Wells Fargo Master Trust:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio (the Portfolio), one of the portfolios constituting Wells Fargo Master Trust, including the portfolio of investments, as of May 31, 2021, the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the financial statements) and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Portfolio as of May 31, 2021, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Portfolio in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and financial highlights, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. Such procedures also included confirmation of securities owned as of May 31, 2021, by correspondence with the custodian, transfer agent and brokers, or by other appropriate auditing procedures. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and financial highlights. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have not been able to determine the specific year that we began serving as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies; however, we are aware that we have served as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies since at least 1955.
Boston, Massachusetts
July 28, 2021

42  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio


Other information (unaudited)
TAX INFORMATION
For corporate shareholders, pursuant to Section 854 of the Internal Revenue Code, 100% of ordinary income dividends qualify for the corporate dividends-received deduction for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 854 of the Internal Revenue Code, $1,754,565 of income dividends paid during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 has been designated as qualified dividend income (QDI).
PROXY VOTING INFORMATION
A description of the policies and procedures used to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-222-8222, visiting our website at wfam.com, or visiting the SEC website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the proxies related to portfolio securities were voted during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the website at wfam.com or by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS INFORMATION
The Fund and Portfolio file their complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year as an exhibit to their reports on Form N-PORT. Shareholders and Interest holders may view the filed Form N-PORT by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov.

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio  |  43


Other information (unaudited)
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS
Each of the Trustees and Officers listed in the table below acts in identical capacities for each fund in the Wells Fargo family of funds, which consists of 139 mutual funds comprising the Wells Fargo Funds Trust, Wells Fargo Variable Trust, Wells Fargo Master Trust and four closed-end funds (collectively the “Fund Complex”). This table should be read in conjunction with the Prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information1. The mailing address of each Trustee and Officer is 525 Market Street, 12th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105. Each Trustee and Officer serves an indefinite term, however, each Trustee serves such term until reaching the mandatory retirement age established by the Trustees.
Independent Trustees
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service*
Principal occupations during past five years or longer Current other
public company or
investment
company
directorships
William R. Ebsworth
(Born 1957)
Trustee,
since 2015
Retired. From 1984 to 2013, equities analyst, portfolio manager, research director and chief investment officer at Fidelity Management and Research Company in Boston, Tokyo, and Hong Kong, and retired in 2013 as Chief Investment Officer of Fidelity Strategic Advisers, Inc. where he led a team of investment professionals managing client assets. Prior thereto, Board member of Hong Kong Securities Clearing Co., Hong Kong Options Clearing Corp., the Thailand International Fund, Ltd., Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company, and Empire Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company. Audit Committee Chair and Investment Committee Chair of the Vincent Memorial Hospital Endowment (non-profit organization). Mr. Ebsworth is a CFA® charterholder. N/A
Jane A. Freeman
(Born 1953)
Trustee,
since 2015;
Chair Liaison,
since 2018
Retired. From 2012 to 2014 and 1999 to 2008, Chief Financial Officer of Scientific Learning Corporation. From 2008 to 2012, Ms. Freeman provided consulting services related to strategic business projects. Prior to 1999, Portfolio Manager at Rockefeller & Co. and Scudder, Stevens & Clark. Board member of the Harding Loevner Funds from 1996 to 2014, serving as both Lead Independent Director and chair of the Audit Committee. Board member of the Russell Exchange Traded Funds Trust from 2011 to 2012 and the chair of the Audit Committee. Ms. Freeman is also an inactive Chartered Financial Analyst. N/A
Isaiah Harris, Jr.
(Born 1952)
Trustee,
since 2009; Audit
Committee
Chair,
since 2019
Retired. Chairman of the Board of CIGNA Corporation since 2009, and Director since 2005. From 2003 to 2011, Director of Deluxe Corporation. Prior thereto, President and CEO of BellSouth Advertising and Publishing Corp. from 2005 to 2007, President and CEO of BellSouth Enterprises from 2004 to 2005 and President of BellSouth Consumer Services from 2000 to 2003. Emeritus member of the Iowa State University Foundation Board of Governors. Emeritus Member of the Advisory Board of Iowa State University School of Business. Advisory Board Member, Palm Harbor Academy (private school). Mr. Harris is a certified public accountant (inactive status). CIGNA Corporation
Judith M. Johnson
(Born 1949)
Trustee,
since 2008
Retired. Prior thereto, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund from 1996 to 2008. Ms. Johnson is an attorney, certified public accountant and a certified managerial accountant. N/A
David F. Larcker
(Born 1950)
Trustee,
since 2009
James Irvin Miller Professor of Accounting at the Graduate School of Business (Emeritus), Stanford University, Director of the Corporate Governance Research Initiative and Senior Faculty of The Rock Center for Corporate Governance since 2006. From 2005 to 2008, Professor of Accounting at the Graduate School of Business, Stanford University. Prior thereto, Ernst & Young Professor of Accounting at The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania from 1985 to 2005. N/A

44  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio


Other information (unaudited)
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service*
Principal occupations during past five years or longer Current other
public company or
investment
company
directorships
Olivia S. Mitchell
(Born 1953)
Trustee,
since 2006;
Nominating and
Governance
Committee Chair,
since 2018
International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans Professor, Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania since 1993. Director of Wharton’s Pension Research Council and Boettner Center on Pensions & Retirement Research, and Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. Previously, Cornell University Professor from 1978 to 1993. N/A
Timothy J. Penny
(Born 1951)
Trustee,
since 1996;
Chair,
since 2018
President and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Minnesota Initiative Foundation, a non-profit organization, since 2007. Member of the Board of Trustees of NorthStar Education Finance, Inc., a non-profit organization, since 2007. N/A
James G. Polisson
(Born 1959)
Trustee,
since 2018
Retired. Chief Marketing Officer, Source (ETF) UK Services, Ltd, from 2015 to 2017. From 2012 to 2015, Principal of The Polisson Group, LLC, a management consulting, corporate advisory and principal investing company. Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director at Russell Investments, Global Exchange Traded Funds from 2010 to 2012. Managing Director of Barclays Global Investors from 1998 to 2010 and Global Chief Marketing Officer for iShares and Barclays Global Investors from 2000 to 2010. Trustee of the San Francisco Mechanics’ Institute, a non-profit organization, from 2013 to 2015. Board member of the Russell Exchange Traded Fund Trust from 2011 to 2012. Director of Barclays Global Investors Holdings Deutschland GmbH from 2006 to 2009. Mr. Polisson is an attorney and has a retired status with the Massachusetts and District of Columbia Bar Associations. N/A
Pamela Wheelock
(Born 1959)
Trustee,
since January
2020; previously
Trustee from
January 2018 to
July 2019
Board member of the Destination Medical Center Economic Development Agency, Rochester, Minnesota since 2019. Interim President of the McKnight Foundation from January to September 2020. Acting Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Human Services, July 2019 through September 2019. Human Services Manager (part-time), Minnesota Department of Human Services, October 2019 through December 2019. Chief Operating Officer, Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity from 2017 to 2019. Vice President of University Services, University of Minnesota from 2012 to 2016. Prior thereto, on the Board of Directors, Governance Committee and Finance Committee for the Minnesota Philanthropy Partners (Saint Paul Foundation) from 2012 to 2018, Interim Chief Executive Officer of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota from 2011 to 2012, Chairman of the Board from 2009 to 2012 and Board Director from 2003 to 2015. Vice President, Leadership and Community Engagement, Bush Foundation, Saint Paul, Minnesota (a private foundation) from 2009 to 2011. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Minnesota Sports and Entertainment from 2004 to 2009 and Senior Vice President from 2002 to 2004. Executive Vice President of the Minnesota Wild Foundation from 2004 to 2008. Commissioner of Finance, State of Minnesota, from 1999 to 2002. Currently Board Chair of the Minnesota Wild Foundation since 2010. N/A
*  Length of service dates reflect the Trustee’s commencement of service with the Trust’s predecessor entities, where applicable.

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio  |  45


Other information (unaudited)
Officers
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service
Principal occupations during past five years or longer
Andrew Owen
(Born 1960)
President,
since 2017
Executive Vice President of Wells Fargo & Company and Head of Affiliated Managers, Wells Fargo Asset Management, since 2014. In addition, Mr. Owen is currently President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC since 2017. Prior thereto, Executive Vice President responsible for marketing, investments and product development for Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, from 2009 to 2014.
Jeremy DePalma
(Born 1974)
Treasurer,
since 2012
(for certain funds in
the Fund Complex);
since 2021 (for
the remaining funds in the
Fund Complex)
Senior Vice President of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC since 2009. Senior Vice President of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC from 2008 to 2010 and head of the Fund Reporting and Control Team within Fund Administration from 2005 to 2010.
Michelle Rhee
(Born 1966)
Chief Legal Officer,
since 2019
Secretary of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC and Chief Legal Counsel of Wells Fargo Asset Management since 2018. Deputy General Counsel of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. since 2020 and Assistant General Counsel of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. from 2018 to 2020. Associate General Counsel and Managing Director of Bank of America Corporation from 2004 to 2018.
Catherine Kennedy
(Born 1969)
Secretary,
since 2019
Vice President of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC and Senior Counsel of the Wells Fargo Legal Department since 2010. Vice President and Senior Counsel of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC from 1998 to 2010.
Michael H. Whitaker
(Born 1967)
Chief Compliance Officer,
since 2016
Chief Compliance Officer of Wells Fargo Asset Management since 2016. Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer for Fidelity Investments from 2007 to 2016.
1  The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about the Trustees and is available, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-222-8222 or by visiting the website at wfam.com.

46  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio


Other information (unaudited)
LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
In accordance with Rule 22e-4 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Liquidity Rule”), Wells Fargo Funds Trust and Wells Fargo Master Trust (each a “Trust”) has adopted and implemented a liquidity risk management program (the “Program”) on behalf of each of its series, including the Fund and the Portfolio, which is reasonably designed to assess and manage the Fund’s or the Portfolio’s liquidity risk. “Liquidity risk” is defined under the Liquidity Rule as the risk that the Fund or Portfolio is unable to meet redemption requests without significantly diluting remaining investors’ interests in the Fund or Portfolio. Each Trust’s Board of Trustees (each a “Board”) previously approved the designation of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”), the Fund’s investment manager and the Portfolio’s investment adviser, as the administrator of the Program, and Funds Management has established a Liquidity Risk Management Council (the “Council”) composed of personnel from multiple departments within Funds Management and its affiliates to assist Funds Management in the implementation and on-going administration of the Program.
The Program is comprised of various components designed to support the assessment and/or management of liquidity risk, including: (1) the periodic assessment (no less frequently than annually) of certain factors that influence the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s liquidity risk; (2) the periodic classification (no less frequently than monthly) of the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s investments into one of four liquidity categories that reflect an estimate of their liquidity under current market conditions; (3) a 15% limit on the acquisition of “illiquid investments” (as defined under the Liquidity Rule); (4) to the extent the Fund or the Portfolio does not invest primarily in “highly liquid investments” (as defined under the Liquidity Rule), the determination of a minimum percentage of the Fund’s or the Portfolio’s assets that generally will be invested in highly liquid investments (an “HLIM”); (5) if the Fund or the Portfolio has established an HLIM, the periodic review (no less frequently than annually) of the HLIM and the adoption of policies and procedures for responding to a shortfall of the Fund’s or the Portfolio’s “highly liquid investments” below its HLIM; and (6) periodic reporting to the Board.
At a meeting of the Board held on May 17-19, 2021, the Board received and reviewed a written report (the “Report”) from Funds Management that addressed the operation of the Program and assessed its adequacy and effectiveness for the period from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 (the “Reporting Period”). Among other things, the Report discussed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on liquidity and management of liquidity risk during the Reporting Period, including during the stressed market conditions caused by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. No significant liquidity events impacting the Fund or the Portfolio were noted in the Report. As applicable to the Fund and the Portfolio, there were no material changes to the Program during the Reporting Period.
Funds Management concluded in the Report that the Program is operating effectively to assess and manage the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s liquidity risk, and that the Program has been and continues to be adequately and effectively implemented to monitor and, as applicable, respond to the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s liquidity developments.
There can be no assurance that the Program will achieve its objectives under all circumstances in the future. Please refer to the Fund’s prospectus for more information regarding the Fund’s exposure to liquidity risk and other risks to which an investment in the Fund may be subject.

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio  |  47


Board considerations (unaudited)
BOARD CONSIDERATION OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, ADVISORY AND SUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENTS:
Board Considerations – Current Agreements
Under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Board of Trustees (each, a “Board” and collectively, the “Boards”) of each of Wells Fargo Funds Trust (“Funds Trust”) and Wells Fargo Master Trust (“Master Trust”, and collectively, the “Trusts”) must determine annually whether to approve the continuation of the Trusts’ investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements, as applicable. In this regard, at a Board meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Meeting”), the Funds Trust Board, all the members of which have no direct or indirect interest in the investment management agreement and are not “interested persons” of the Trusts, as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), reviewed and approved for Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund (the “Gateway Fund”) an investment management agreement (the “Gateway Fund Management Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”).
At the Meeting, the Master Trust Board, all the members of which have no direct or indirect interest in the investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements and are Independent Trustees, reviewed and approved: (i) an investment advisory agreement (the “Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement”) with Funds Management for Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio, a portfolio of Master Trust (the “Master Portfolio”); and (ii) an investment sub-advisory agreement (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Wells Capital Management Incorporated (the “Sub-Adviser”), an affiliate of Funds Management, for the Master Portfolio.
The Gateway Fund and the Master Portfolio are collectively referred to as the “Funds.” The Gateway Fund Management Agreement, the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement are collectively referred to as the “Advisory Agreements.”
The Gateway Fund is a gateway feeder fund that invest substantially all of its assets in the Master Portfolio. The Master Portfolio has a substantially similar investment objective and substantially similar investment strategies to the Gateway Fund. Information provided to the Boards regarding the Gateway Fund is also applicable to the Master Portfolio, as relevant.
The Boards noted that Wells Fargo & Company recently announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”), which includes Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser, to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. and/or their affiliates (the “Transaction”). The Boards further noted that the Transaction would result in a change-of-control of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser, which would be considered to be an assignment that would result in the termination of the Advisory Agreements. In light of the Transaction, each Board separately considered for approval a new investment management agreement with Funds Management and, with respect to the Master Portfolio, the Master Trust Board considered for approval a new sub-advisory agreement with the Sub-Adviser (collectively, the “New Agreements”) that would replace the Advisory Agreements upon consummation of the Transaction, subject to approval of each respective New Agreement by each Fund’s shareholders. The Boards also considered for approval interim agreements to go into effect in the event shareholders do not approve the New Agreements before the Transaction is completed. The interim agreements would allow the Manager and the Sub-Adviser, as applicable, to continue providing services to the Funds while the Funds continue to seek shareholder approval of the New Agreements. The Boards noted that the terms of the interim agreements would be identical to those of the current Advisory Agreements, except for the term and certain escrow provisions.
At the Meeting, the Boards considered the factors and reached the conclusions described below relating to the selection of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser and the approval of the Advisory Agreements. Prior to the Meeting, including at Board meetings held in April and May 2021, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with representatives of Funds Management about these matters. Also, the Boards have adopted a team-based approach, with each team consisting of a sub-set of Trustees, to assist the full Boards in the discharge of their duties in reviewing investment performance and other matters throughout the year. The Independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Advisory Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately.
In providing information to the Boards, Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser were guided by a detailed set of requests for information submitted to them by independent legal counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees at the start of the Boards’ annual contract renewal process earlier in 2021. In considering and approving the Advisory Agreements, the Trustees considered the information they believed relevant, including but not limited to the information discussed below. The Boards considered not only the specific information presented in connection with the Meeting, but also the knowledge gained over time through interaction with Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser about various topics. In this regard, the Boards reviewed reports of Funds Management at each of their quarterly meetings, which included, among other things, portfolio reviews and investment performance reports. In addition, the Boards and the teams mentioned above confer with portfolio managers at various times throughout the year. The Boards did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each individual Trustee may have attributed different weights to various factors.

48  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
After its deliberations, the Funds Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Gateway Fund Management Agreement for a one-year term. Additionally, after its deliberations, the Master Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement, each for a one-year term. The Boards considered the approval of the Advisory Agreements for the Funds as part of their consideration of agreements for funds across the complex, but their approvals were made on a fund-by-fund basis. The following summarizes a number of important, but not necessarily all, factors considered by the Boards in support of their approvals.
Nature, extent and quality of services
The Boards received and considered various information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser under the Advisory Agreements. This information included a description of the investment advisory services and Fund-level administrative services, as well as, among other things, a summary of the background and experience of senior management of WFAM, of which Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser are a part, and a summary of investments made in the business of WFAM. The Boards also received a description of Funds Management’s and the Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans, including a summary of the performance of such plans and any changes thereto during the COVID-19 pandemic, and of their approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity. The Boards also received and reviewed information about Funds Management’s role as administrator of the Funds’ liquidity risk management program, Funds Management’s approach to risk management, and Funds Management’s intermediary and vendor oversight program.
The Boards also considered the qualifications, background, tenure and responsibilities of each of the portfolio managers primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the Funds. The Boards evaluated the ability of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser to attract and retain qualified investment professionals, including research, advisory and supervisory personnel.
The Boards further considered the compliance programs and compliance records of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser. In addition, the Boards took into account the full range of services provided to the Funds by Funds Management and its affiliates. The Boards also considered information about retention and back-up arrangements that have been put into place with respect to key personnel of WFAM in connection with the anticipated Transaction, noting that WFAM provided assurances that the announcement and eventual culmination of the Transaction is not expected to result in any diminution in the nature or quality of services provided to the Funds.
Fund investment performance and expenses
The Boards considered the investment performance results for each of the Funds over various time periods ended December 31, 2020. The Boards considered these results in comparison to the investment performance of funds in a universe that was determined by Broadridge Inc. (“Broadridge”) to be similar to the Gateway Fund (the “Universe”), and in comparison to the Gateway Fund’s benchmark index and to other comparative data. Broadridge is an independent provider of investment company data. The Boards received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the performance Universe. The Funds Trust Board noted that the investment performance of the Gateway Fund (Administrator Class) was lower than the average investment performance of its Universe for the one-, three-, five- and ten-year periods ended December 31, 2020. The Funds Trust Board also noted that the investment performance of the Gateway Fund was lower than its benchmark index, the Russell 2000® Value Index, for one-, three, and five-year periods ended December 31, 2020, and in range of the performance of its benchmark for the ten-year period ended December 31, 2020.
The Master Trust Board took note of the investment performance of the Master Portfolio in the context of reviewing the investment performance of the Gateway Fund.
The Funds Trust Board received information concerning, and discussed factors contributing to, the underperformance of the Gateway Fund relative to the Universe for the periods identified above. The Funds Trust Board took note of the explanations for the relative underperformance during these periods, including with respect to investment decisions and market factors that affected the Gateway Fund’s investment performance.
The Funds Trust Board also received and considered information regarding the Gateway Fund’s net operating expense ratios, which include fees and expenses of the Master Portfolio, and their various components, including actual management fees assessed at the Gateway Fund and Master Portfolio levels, custodian and other non-management fees, and Rule 12b-1 and non-Rule 12b-1 shareholder service fees. The Funds Trust Board considered these ratios in comparison to the median ratios of funds in class-specific expense groups that were determined by Broadridge to be similar to the Gateway Fund (the “Groups”). The Funds Trust Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the expense Groups and an explanation of how funds comprising expense groups and their expense ratios may vary from year-to-year. Based on the

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund  |  49


Board considerations (unaudited)
Broadridge reports, the Funds Trust Board noted that the net operating expense ratios of the Gateway Fund were lower than or equal to the median net operating expense ratios of its expense Groups for each share class.
With respect to the Master Portfolio, the Master Trust Board reviewed the fee rates that are payable to Funds Management for investment advisory services (as discussed below), which are the only fees charged at the Master Portfolio level, relative to a corresponding expense Group.
The Boards took into account the Funds’ investment performance and expense information provided to them among the factors considered in deciding to re-approve the Advisory Agreements.
Investment management, advisory and sub-advisory fee rates
The Funds Trust Board noted that Funds Management receives no advisory fees from the Gateway Fund as long as the Gateway Fund continues to invest all (or substantially all) of its assets in a single master portfolio. If the Gateway Fund were to change its investment structure so that it began investing in two or more master portfolios (a fund-of-funds), Funds Management would be entitled to receive an annual fee of 0.25% of the Gateway Fund’s average daily net assets for providing investment advisory services to the Gateway Fund, including allocating the Gateway Fund’s assets to the Master Portfolio.
The Funds Trust Board reviewed and considered the contractual fee rates that are payable by the Gateway Fund to Funds Management under the Gateway Fund Management Agreement for management services (other than investment advisory services), as well as the contractual fee rates payable by the Gateway Fund to Funds Management for class-level administrative services under a Class-Level Administration Agreement, which include, among other things, class-level transfer agency and sub-transfer agency costs (collectively, the “Management Rates”).
The Master Trust Board reviewed and considered the contractual investment advisory fee rate that is payable by the Master Portfolio to Funds Management for investment advisory services under the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement (the “Advisory Agreement Rate”). The Master Trust Board also reviewed and considered the contractual investment sub-advisory fee rate that is payable by Funds Management to the Sub-Adviser for investment sub-advisory services (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement Rate”).
Among other information reviewed by the Funds Trust Board was a comparison of the Gateway Fund’s Management Rate, which, for this purpose, includes the advisory fees paid at the Master Portfolio level, with the average contractual investment management fee rates of funds in the expense Groups at a common asset level as well as transfer agency costs of the funds in the expense Groups. The Funds Trust Board noted that the Management Rates of the Gateway Fund were higher than the sum of these average rates for the Gateway Fund’s expense Groups for each share class, except Class R6. The Funds Trust Board noted that the Management Rate of the Gateway Fund was in range of the sum of these average rates for the Gateway Fund’s expense Groups for Class R6. However, the Funds Trust Board noted that the net operating expense ratios of the Gateway Fund were lower than or equal to the median net operating expense ratios of its expense Groups for each share class.
The Master Trust Board reviewed a comparison of the Advisory Agreement Rate of the Master Portfolio with those of other funds in the Master Portfolio’s expense Group at a common asset level. The Master Trust Board noted that the Advisory Agreement Rate of the Master Portfolio was lower than the median rate for the Master Portfolio’s expense Group.
The Master Trust Board also received and considered information about the portions of the total management fees that were retained by Funds Management after payment of the fees to the Sub-Adviser for sub-advisory services. In assessing the reasonableness of these amounts, the Master Trust Board received and evaluated information about the nature and extent of responsibilities retained and risks assumed by Funds Management and not delegated to or assumed by the Sub-Adviser, and about Funds Management’s on-going oversight services. Given the affiliation between Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser, the Master Trust Board ascribed limited relevance to the allocation of fees between them.
The Boards also received and considered information about the nature and extent of services offered and fee rates charged by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser to other types of clients with investment strategies similar to those of the Funds. In this regard, the Boards received information about the significantly greater scope of services, and compliance, reporting and other legal burdens and risks of managing proprietary mutual funds compared with those associated with managing assets of other types of clients, including third-party sub-advised fund clients and non-mutual fund clients such as institutional separate accounts.
Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Funds Trust Board determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the Gateway Fund Management Agreement was reasonable, and the Master Trust Board determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and to the Sub-Adviser under the Sub-Advisory Agreement was reasonable.

50  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
Profitability
The Boards received and considered information concerning the profitability of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo & Co. (“Wells Fargo”) from providing services to the fund family as a whole. The Boards noted that the Sub-Adviser’s profitability information with respect to providing services to the Master Portfolio and other funds in the family was subsumed in the WFAM and Wells Fargo profitability analysis.
Funds Management reported on the methodologies and estimates used in calculating profitability, including a description of the methodology used to allocate certain expenses. Among other things, the Boards noted that the levels of profitability reported on a fund-by-fund basis varied widely, depending on factors such as the size, type and age of fund.
Based on its review, the Boards did not deem the profits reported by Funds Management, WFAM or Wells Fargo from services provided to the Funds to be at a level that would prevent the Boards from approving the continuation of the Advisory Agreements.
Economies of scale
The Boards received and considered information about the potential for Funds Management to experience economies of scale in the provision of management services to the Funds, the difficulties of calculating economies of scale at an individual fund level, and the extent to which potential scale benefits are shared with shareholders of the Funds. The Boards noted the existence of breakpoints in the Master Portfolio’s advisory fee structure and the Gateway Fund’s management fee structure, which operate generally to reduce the Funds’ expense ratios as the Funds grow in size, and the size of the Master Portfolio and the Gateway Fund, respectively, in relation to such breakpoints. The Boards considered that, in addition to advisory fee and management fee breakpoints, Funds Management shares potential economies of scale from its management business in a variety of ways, including through fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangements, competitive management fee rates set at the outset without regard to breakpoints, and investments in the business intended to enhance services available to shareholders.
The Boards concluded that Funds Management’s arrangements with respect to each Fund, including contractual breakpoints, constituted a reasonable approach to sharing potential economies of scale with the Funds and their shareholders.
Other benefits to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser
The Boards received and considered information regarding potential “fall-out” or ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including the Sub-Adviser, as a result of their relationships with the Funds. Ancillary benefits could include, among others, benefits directly attributable to other relationships with the Funds and benefits potentially derived from an increase in Funds Management’s and the Sub-Adviser’s business as a result of their relationships with the Funds. The Boards noted that various affiliates of Funds Management may receive distribution-related fees, shareholder servicing payments and sub-transfer agency fees in respect of shares sold or held through them and services provided.
The Boards also reviewed information about soft dollar credits earned and utilized by the Sub-Adviser, fees earned by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser from managing a private investment vehicle for the fund family’s securities lending collateral, and commissions earned by an affiliated broker from portfolio transactions.
Based on their consideration of the factors and information they deemed relevant, including those described here, the Boards did not find that any ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including the Sub-Adviser, were unreasonable.
Conclusion
At the Meeting, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Funds Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Gateway Fund Management Agreement for a one-year term. Additionally, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Master Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement, each for a one-year term.

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund  |  51


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board Considerations - New Agreements
Overview of the Board evaluation process
At a meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Board Meeting”), the Board of Trustees of Wells Fargo Funds Trust (“Funds Trust”, and the series identified below, the “Funds”) approved the continuation of each Fund’s current Investment Management Agreement (the “Current Investment Management Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”) and the Board of Trustees of Wells Fargo Master Trust (“Master Trust”, and the series identified below in which each Fund invests substantially all of its assets, a “Master Portfolio”) approved the continuation of the current investment advisory agreement (the “Current Advisory Agreement”) with Funds Management, the current sub-advisory agreement with Wells Capital Management Incorporated (“Wells Capital”, and together with Funds Management, the “Advisers”), and the current sub-advisory agreements with Cooke & Bieler, L.P. (“C&B”) and Peregrine Capital Management, LLC (“Peregrine”, and together with C&B, the “Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers”)(collectively, the “Current Agreements”).
Funds Trust Master Trust
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio
Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio
Wells Fargo Index Fund Wells Fargo Index Portfolio
Wells Fargo Real Return Fund Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio
Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio
Each Trustee on the Funds Trust Board and the Master Trust Board of Trustees (collectively, the “Boards”) is not an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) of the Funds or the Master Portfolios (collectively, the “Independent Trustees”). The process followed by the Boards in considering and approving the continuation of each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s Current Agreements is referred to herein as the “2021 Annual Approval Process.”
As noted above, the closing of the sale of Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”) to a holding company (“NewCo”) affiliated with private funds of GTCR LLC (“GTCR”) and of Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. (“Reverence Capital”, and such transaction, the “Transaction”) will result in a change of control of Funds Management and Wells Capital, which will be considered to be an “assignment” of each Fund’s Current Agreements under the 1940 Act that will result in the automatic termination of each Fund’s Current Agreements. In light of the expected termination of each Fund’s Current Agreements upon the closing, at the Board Meeting the Boards also approved, as applicable: (i) for Funds Trust, a new investment management agreement with Funds Management (the “New Investment Management Agreement”); (ii) for the Master Trust, a new advisory agreement with Funds Management (the “New Advisory Agreement”); (iii) for Master Trust, a new sub-advisory agreement (the “New WellsCap Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Wells Capital for Emerging Growth Portfolio, Index Portfolio, Small Company Value Portfolio, Core Bond Portfolio and Real Return Portfolio; (iv) for Master Trust, a new sub-advisory agreement (the “New Peregrine Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Peregrine for Small Company Growth Portfolio; and (v) for Master Trust, a new sub-advisory agreement (the “New C&B Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with C&B for the C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio, each of which is intended to go into effect upon the closing (the “New Agreements”). The process followed by the Boards in reviewing and approving the New Agreements is referred to herein as the “New Agreement Approval Process.”
At a series of meetings held in April and May 2021 (collectively, “April and May 2021 Meetings”) and at the Board Meeting, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital about the New Agreements and related matters. The Boards reviewed and discussed information furnished by Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital that the Boards considered reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the New Agreements and the services to be provided. At these meetings, senior representatives from Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital made presentations to, and responded to questions from, the Boards.
In providing information to the Boards in connection with the 2021 annual approval process for the Current Agreements (the “2021 Annual Approval Process”) and the New Agreement Approval Process, Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital (as applicable) were guided by requests for information submitted by independent legal counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. In considering and approving the New Agreements, the Trustees considered the information they believed relevant, including but not limited to the information discussed herein. The Boards considered not only the specific information presented in connection with the April and May 2021 Meetings as well as the Board Meeting, but also the knowledge gained over time through interaction with Funds Management, as well as with Wells Capital and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers (collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”), about various topics. In this regard, the Boards review reports of Funds Management at each of their regular

52  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board meetings, which includes, among other things, portfolio reviews and investment performance reports. In addition, the Boards confer with portfolio managers at various times throughout the year. The Boards were assisted in their evaluation of the New Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom the Independent Trustees received separate legal advice and with whom the Independent Trustees met separately. The Boards did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each individual Trustee may have attributed different weights to various factors.
Among other information considered by the Boards in connection with the Transaction was:
■  Information regarding the Transaction: information about the structure, financing sources and material terms and conditions of the Transaction, including the expected impact on the businesses conducted by the Advisers and by Wells Fargo Funds Distributor LLC, as the distributor of Fund shares.
■  Information regarding NewCo, GTCR and Reverence Capital: (i) information about NewCo, including information about its expected financial condition and access to capital, and senior leadership team; (ii) the experience of senior management at GTCR and Reverence Capital in acquiring portfolio companies; (iii) the plan to operationalize NewCo, including the transition of necessary infrastructure services through a transition services agreement with Wells Fargo under which Wells Fargo will continue to provide NewCo with certain services for a specified period of time after the closing; and (iv) information regarding regulatory matters, compliance, and risk management functions at NewCo, including resources to be dedicated thereto.
■  Impact of the Transaction on WFAM and Service Providers: (i) information regarding any changes to personnel and/or other resources of the Advisers as a result of the Transaction, including assurances regarding comparable and competitive compensation arrangements to attract and retain highly qualified personnel; and (ii) information about the organizational and operating structure with respect to NewCo, the Advisers and the Funds and Master Portfolios.
■  Impact of the Transaction on the Funds and their Shareholders and the Master Portfolios and their Interest Holders: (i) information regarding anticipated benefits to the Funds and the Master Portfolios as a result of the Transaction; (ii) a commitment that the Funds and Master Portfolios would not bear any expenses, directly or indirectly, in connection with the Transaction; (iii) confirmation that the Advisers and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers intend to continue to manage the Funds in a manner consistent with each Fund’s or Master Portfolio’s current investment objectives and principal investments strategies, as applicable; and (iv) a commitment that neither NewCo nor WFAM will take any steps that would impose any “unfair burden” (as that term is used in section 15(f)(1)(B) of the 1940 Act) on the Funds or the Master Portfolios as a result of the Transaction.
With respect to the New Agreements, the Boards considered: (i) a representation that, after the closing, all of the Funds and Master Portfolios will continue to be managed and advised by their current Advisers and Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, as applicable, and that the same portfolio managers are expected to continue to manage the Funds or Master Portfolios, as applicable, after the Transaction; (ii) information regarding the terms of the New Agreements, including changes as compared to the Current Agreements; (iii) information confirming that the fee rates payable under the New Agreements will not increase as a result of the Transaction as compared to the rates under the Current Agreements; and (iv) assurances that the Transaction is not expected to cause any diminution with respect to the nature, extent and quality of any of the services currently provided to the Funds or the Master Portfolios by the Advisers and Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers as a result of the Transaction.
In addition to considering information furnished specifically to evaluate the impact of the Transaction on the Funds and their respective shareholders and the Master Portfolios and their interest holders in connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards considered information furnished at prior meetings of the Boards and their committees, including detailed information provided in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process. In this regard, in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received information about complex-wide and individual Fund and Master Portfolio performance, fees and expenses, including: (i) a report from an independent data provider comparing the investment performance of each Fund or Master Portfolio to the investment performance of comparable funds and benchmark indices, over various time periods; (ii) a report from an independent data provider comparing each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s total expense ratio (and its components) to those of comparable funds; (iii) comparative information concerning the fees charged and services provided by the Advisers and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, to each Fund or Master Portfolio in managing other accounts (which may include other mutual funds, collective investment funds and institutional accounts), if any, that employ investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing such Fund(s) or Master Portfolio(s) as applicable; and (iv) profitability analyses of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo from providing services to the fund family as a whole.
After its deliberations, the Boards unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the respective New Agreements is reasonable, approved the respective New Agreements for a two-year term, and

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund  |  53


Board considerations (unaudited)
voted to recommend that Fund shareholders approve the New Agreements. The Boards considered the approval of the New Agreements as part of their consideration of agreements for funds and master portfolios across the complex, but their approvals were made on a fund-by-fund basis. The following summarizes a number of important, but not necessarily all, factors considered by the Boards in support of their approvals.
Nature, extent and quality of services
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered various information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds and Master Portfolios by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the Current Agreements. This information included a description of the investment advisory services and Fund-level administrative services covered by the Current Agreements, as well as, among other things, a summary of the background and experience of senior management of WFAM, of which Funds Management and Wells Capital are a part, and a summary of investments made in the business of WFAM. The Boards also received a description of Funds Management’s and Wells Capital’s business continuity plans, including a summary of the performance of such plans and any changes thereto during the COVID-19 pandemic, and of their approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity. The Boards also received and reviewed information about Funds Management’s role as administrator of the Funds’ and Master Portfolios’ liquidity risk management program, Funds Management’s approach to risk management, and Funds Management’s intermediary and vendor oversight program.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also considered the qualifications, background, tenure and responsibilities of each of the portfolio managers primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the Funds and the Master Portfolios. The Boards evaluated the ability of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to attract and retain qualified investment professionals, including research, advisory and supervisory personnel.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards further considered the compliance programs and compliance records of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers. In addition, the Boards took into account the full range of services provided to the Funds by Funds Management and its affiliates.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards considered, among other information, the structure of the Transaction and expected impact, if any, of the Transaction on the operations, facilities, organization and personnel of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers. The Boards received assurances from Funds Management that each Fund and Master Portfolio will continue to be advised by its current Sub-Advisers after the closing, and that the same individual portfolio managers are expected to continue to manage the Funds and Master Portfolios, respectively, after the closing. With respect to the recruitment and retention of key personnel, the Boards noted information from GTCR, Reverence Capital and the Advisers regarding the potential benefits for employees of joining NewCo. The Boards recognized that the personnel of the Advisers who had been extended offers may not accept such offers, and personnel changes at the Advisers or the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers may occur in the future in the ordinary course.
In addition, the Boards considered information regarding the infrastructure, operational capabilities and support staff in place to assist in the portfolio management and operations of the Funds and Master Portfolios, as applicable, including the provision of administrative services, and the anticipated impact of the Transaction on such matters. The Boards also considered the business-related and other risks to which the Advisers and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers may be subject in managing the Funds and Master Portfolios, as applicable, and in connection with the Transaction. The Boards also considered the transition and integration plans as a result of the change in ownership of the Advisers from Wells Fargo to NewCo. The Boards considered the resources and infrastructure that NewCo intends to devote to its compliance program to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations, as well as its risk management program and cybersecurity program. The Boards also took into account assurances received from the Advisers, GTCR and Reverence Capital that the Transaction is not expected to cause any diminution in the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Advisers or the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers to the Funds and their shareholders or to the Master Portfolios and their interest holders, as applicable.
Fund investment performance and expenses
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards considered the investment performance results for each Fund over various time periods ended December 31, 2020. The Boards considered these results in comparison to the investment performance of funds in a universe that was determined by Broadridge Inc. (“Broadridge”) to be similar to each Fund (the “Universe”), and in comparison to each Fund’s benchmark index and to other comparative data. Broadridge is an independent provider of investment company data. The Boards received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the performance Universe. Where applicable, the Boards received information concerning, and discussed factors contributing to, underperformance of Funds relative to the Universe and benchmark for any underperformance periods.
The Master Trust Board of Trustees took note of the investment performance of the Master Portfolios in the context of reviewing the investment performance of the Funds.

54  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also received and considered information regarding each Fund’s and Portfolio’s net operating expense ratios and their various components, including actual management fees, custodian and other non-management fees, and Rule 12b-1 and non-Rule 12b-1 shareholder service fees. The Boards considered these ratios in comparison to the median ratios of funds in class-specific expense groups that were determined by Broadridge to be similar to each Fund (the “Groups”). The Boards received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the expense Groups and an explanation of how funds comprising expense groups and their expense ratios may vary from year-to-year.
With respect to the Master Portfolios, the Master Trust Board of Trustees reviewed the fee rates that are payable to Funds Management for investment advisory services, which are the only fees charged at the Master Portfolio level, relative to a corresponding expense Group.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards received a commitment that WFAM will maintain fee and expense commitments for at least two years after the closing. The Boards took into account each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s investment performance and expense information among the factors considered in deciding to approve the New Agreements.
Investment management, advisory and sub-advisory fee rates
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board of Trustees of the Trust noted that Funds Management receives no advisory fees from a Fund as long as the Fund continues to invest all (or substantially all) of its assets in a single master portfolio. If a Fund were to change its investment structure so that it began investing in two or more master portfolios (a fund-of-funds), Funds Management would be entitled to receive an annual fee of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets for providing investment advisory services to the Fund, including allocating the Fund’s assets among the Master Portfolios.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board of Trustees of the Trust reviewed and considered the contractual fee rates that are payable by each Fund to Funds Management under the Fund’s Management Agreement for management services (other than investment advisory services), as well as the contractual fee rates payable by the Fund to Funds Management for class-level administrative services under a Class-Level Administration Agreement, which include, among other things, class-level transfer agency and subtransfer agency costs (collectively, the “Management Rates”). The Master Trust Board of Trustees reviewed and considered the contractual investment advisory fee rate that is payable by each Master Portfolio to Funds Management for investment advisory services under the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement (the “Advisory Agreement Rate”). The Master Trust Board of Trustees also reviewed and considered the contractual investment sub-advisory fee rates that are payable by Funds Management to the Sub-Advisers for investment sub-advisory services (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement Rates”).
Among other information reviewed by the Boards in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, was a comparison of each Fund’s Management Rates which, for this purpose, includes the advisory fees paid at the Master Portfolio level, with the average contractual investment management fee rates of funds in the expense Groups at a common asset level as well as transfer agency costs of the funds in the expense Groups.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also received and considered information about the nature and extent of services offered and fee rates charged by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to other types of clients, if any, with investment strategies similar to those of each Fund. In this regard, the Boards received information about the significantly greater scope of services, and compliance, reporting and other legal burdens and risks of managing proprietary mutual funds compared with those associated with managing assets of other types of clients, including third-party sub-advised fund clients and non-mutual fund clients such as institutional separate accounts.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards noted the assurances received by it that there would be no increases to any of the Management Rates, the Advisory Agreement Rates or the Sub-Advisory Agreement Rates as a result of the Transaction. The Boards also considered that the New Agreements do not change the computation method for calculating such fees, and there is no present intention to reduce expense waiver and reimbursement arrangements that are currently in effect. Based on their consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Boards determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the New Management Agreement and the New Advisory Agreement and payable to the Sub-Advisers under the New Sub-Advisory Agreements was reasonable.
Profitability
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered information concerning the profitability of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo from providing services to the fund family as a whole. The Boards noted that Wells Capital’s profitability information with respect to providing services to each Fund

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund  |  55


Board considerations (unaudited)
and other funds in the family was subsumed in the WFAM and Wells Fargo profitability analysis. The Boards did not consider profitability with respect to the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, as the sub-advisory fees paid to the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers had been negotiated by Funds Management on an arm’s-length basis.
Funds Management reported on the methodologies and estimates used in calculating profitability in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, including a description of the methodology used to allocate certain expenses. Among other things, the Boards noted that the levels of profitability reported on a fund-by-fund basis varied widely, depending on factors such as the size, type and age of fund.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards received certain information about NewCo’s projected financial condition, and reviewed with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital the underlying assumptions on which such information was based. The Boards considered that NewCo is a newly formed entity, with no historical operations, revenues or expenses, and that it is difficult to predict with any degree of certainty the future profitability of NewCo and the Advisers from advisory activities under the New Agreements. The Boards considered that the fee rates payable under the New Agreements will not increase as a result of the Transaction as compared to the rates under the Current Agreements, and that the current contractual expense limitations applicable to each Fund will not increase. The Boards noted that if the New Agreements are approved by shareholders and the Transaction closes, the Boards will have the opportunity in the future to review the profitability of NewCo and the Advisers from advisory activities under the New Agreements with the Advisers.
Economies of scale
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered information about the potential for Funds Management to experience economies of scale in the provision of management services to the Funds and the Master Portfolios, the difficulties of calculating economies of scale at an individual fund level, and the extent to which potential scale benefits are shared with Fund shareholders. The Boards noted the existence of breakpoints in each Fund’s management fee structure and each Master Portfolio’s advisory fee structure, which operate generally to reduce each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s and expense ratios as they grows in size, and the size of each Fund and Master Portfolio and in relation to such breakpoints. The Boards considered that, in addition to advisory fee and management fee and advisory fee breakpoints, Funds Management shares potential economies of scale from its management business in a variety of ways, including through fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangements, competitive management fee rates set at the outset without regard to breakpoints, and investments in the business intended to enhance services available to shareholders.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards noted that NewCo and the Advisers may benefit from possible growth of the Funds and Master Portfolios resulting from enhanced distribution capabilities. However, the Boards noted that other factors could also affect the potential for economies of scale, and that it was not possible to quantify any potential future economies of scale. Based upon the information furnished to the Boards in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process and the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards concluded that Funds Management’s arrangements with respect to each Fund and Master Portfolio, including contractual breakpoints and expense limitation arrangements, constitute a reasonable approach to sharing potential economies of scale with the Fund and its shareholders and the Master Portfolio and its interest holders.
“Fall-out” benefits to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered information regarding potential “fall-out” or ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including Wells Capital, and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers as a result of their relationships with the Funds and the Master Portfolios, as applicable. Ancillary benefits could include, among others, benefits directly attributable to other relationships with the Funds and Master Portfolios and benefits potentially derived from an increase in Funds Management’s and the Wells Capital’s business as a result of their relationships with the Funds and the Master Portfolios. The Boards noted that various current affiliates of Funds Management may receive distribution-related fees, shareholder servicing payments and sub-transfer agency fees in respect of shares sold or held through them and services provided.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also reviewed information about any soft dollar credits earned and utilized by the Sub-Advisers, fees earned by Funds Management and Wells Capital from managing a private investment vehicle for the fund family’s securities lending collateral, and commissions earned by an affiliated broker of Wells Fargo from portfolio transactions.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards received information to the effect that the Transaction is not expected to have a material impact on the fall-out benefits currently realized by Funds Management and its affiliates, including Wells Capital, and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers. The information reviewed by the Boards also noted that several of the ancillary benefits identified for WFAM would be potential ancillary benefits for NewCo, including that the scale and reputation of

56  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
the Funds and Master Portfolios might benefit NewCo’s broader reputation, product initiatives, technology investment and talent acquisition. Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Boards did not find that any ancillary benefits expected to be received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including NewCo and Wells Capital and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, under the New Agreements were unreasonable.
Conclusion
At the Board Meeting, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Boards unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the New Agreements is reasonable, approved the New Agreements for a two-year term, and voted to recommend that Fund shareholders approve the New Agreements.

Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund  |  57


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board Considerations - Interim Agreements
At a meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Board Meeting”), the Boards of Trustees (each, a “Board”, and collectively, the “Boards”) of Wells Fargo Funds Trust, Wells Fargo Master Trust, Wells Fargo Variable Trust, Wells Fargo Global Dividend Opportunity Fund, Wells Fargo Income Opportunities Fund, Wells Fargo Multi-Sector Income Fund and Wells Fargo Utilities and High Income Fund (each a “Trust”, and the series thereof, a “Fund”) reviewed and approved for the Trusts and Funds, as applicable: (i) interim investment management agreements (the “Interim Management Agreements”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”); (ii) interim investment advisory agreements (the “Interim Advisory Agreements”) with Funds Management; and (iii) interim sub-advisory agreements (the “Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements”) with each of Cooke & Bieler, L.P., Galliard Capital Management LLC (“Galliard”), Peregrine Capital Management Inc., Wells Capital Management LLC (“WellsCap”), and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited (“WFAMI”, and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”). Each Trustee on the Board is not an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) of the Funds (collectively, the “Independent Trustees”). The Interim Management Agreements, Interim Advisory Agreements, and Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements are collectively referred to as the “Interim Advisory Agreements.”
At the Board Meeting, the Boards reviewed and approved the continuation of existing investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements (the “Current Advisory Agreements”) for each Trust and Fund, as applicable. The factors considered and conclusions reached by the Boards in approving the Current Advisory Agreements are summarized in the section entitled “Board Considerations – Current Agreements” of this shareholder report. The Boards noted that Wells Fargo & Company has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”), which includes Funds Management, Galliard, WellsCap and WFAMI (the “Affiliated Sub-Advisers”), to a holding company affiliated with private funds of GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. (the “Transaction”). The Boards further noted that the Transaction would result in a change-of-control of Funds Management and the Affiliated Sub-Advisers, which would be considered to be an “assignment” under the 1940 Act that would terminate the Current Advisory Agreements. At the Board Meeting, the Boards also reviewed and approved new investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements (the “New Advisory Agreements”) for each Trust and Fund, as applicable, that would replace the Current Advisory Agreements upon consummation of the Transaction, subject to approval of the New Advisory Agreements by the applicable Trust’s or Fund’s shareholders. The factors considered and conclusions reached by the Boards in approving the New Advisory Agreements are summarized in the section entitled “Board Considerations – New Agreements” of this shareholder report.
At the Board Meeting, the Boards also approved the Interim Advisory Agreements, which will go into effect for a Trust or Fund only in the event that shareholders of such Trust or Fund do not approve the New Advisory Agreement(s) for the Trust or Fund by the closing date of the Transaction, when the Current Advisory Agreements will terminate. The Board noted that, in such a circumstance, the Interim Advisory Agreements will permit continuity of management by allowing Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to continue providing services to the Trust or Fund pursuant to the Interim Advisory Agreements while the Trust or Fund continues to solicit shareholder approval of such New Advisory Agreement(s). The Boards noted that the terms of the Interim Advisory Agreements are identical to those of the Current Advisory Agreements, except for the term and the addition of escrow provisions with respect to the advisory fees. The Boards also noted that the entities that would service the Funds and Trusts under the Interim Advisory Agreements are identical to those that provide services under the Current Advisory Agreements and those that will provide services under the New Advisory Agreements.
In approving the Interim Advisory Agreements, the Boards considered the same factors and reached the same conclusions as they considered and reached with respect to the Boards’ approvals of the Current Advisory Agreements and New Advisory Agreements, as applicable, which are described in separate Board Consideration sections within this shareholder report. Prior to the Board Meeting, including at a series of meetings held in April and May 2021, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. about the Interim Advisory Agreements and related matters. The Independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Interim Advisory Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately.
At the Board Meeting, after considering the factors and reaching the conclusions described in the separate Board Consideration sections within this shareholder report, the Boards unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and to each Sub-Adviser under each of the Interim Advisory Agreements was reasonable, and approved the Interim Advisory Agreements.

58  |  Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund




For more information
More information about Wells Fargo Funds is available free upon request. To obtain literature, please write, visit the Fund's website, or call:
Wells Fargo Funds
P.O. Box 219967
Kansas City, MO 64121-9967
Website: wfam.com
Individual investors: 1-800-222-8222
Retail investment professionals: 1-888-877-9275
Institutional investment professionals: 1-866-765-0778
This report and the financial statements contained herein are submitted for the general information of the shareholders of the Fund. If this report is used for promotional purposes, distribution of the report must be accompanied or preceded by a current prospectus. Before investing, please consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of the investment. For a current prospectus and, if available, a summary prospectus, containing this information, call 1-800-222-8222 or visit the Fund's website at wfam.com. Read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) is the trade name for certain investment advisory/management firms owned by Wells Fargo & Company. These firms include but are not limited to Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC. Certain products managed by WFAM entities are distributed by Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC (a broker-dealer and Member FINRA).
This material is for general informational and educational purposes only and is NOT intended to provide investment advice or a recommendation of any kind - including a recommendation for any specific investment, strategy, or plan.
 INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED  ■  NO BANK GUARANTEE  ■  MAY LOSE VALUE 
© 2021 Wells Fargo & Company. All rights reserved.
PAR-0621-00767 07-21
A286/AR286 05-21


Annual Report
May 31, 2021
Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund




Contents

2

6

10
Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund  

12
Financial statements  

13

14

15

16

23

28
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio  

29
Financial statements  

52

53

54

55

56

61

62
Board considerations  

67

71

77
 
Reduce clutter.
Save trees.
Sign up for electronic delivery of prospectuses and shareholder reports at wellsfargo.com/ advantagedelivery
The views expressed and any forward-looking statements are as of May 31, 2021, unless otherwise noted, and are those of the Fund's portfolio managers and/or Wells Fargo Asset Management. Discussions of individual securities or the markets generally are not intended as individual recommendations. Future events or results may vary significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. The views expressed are subject to change at any time in response to changing circumstances in the market. Wells Fargo Asset Management and the Fund disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any views expressed or forward-looking statements.
 INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED  ■  NO BANK GUARANTEE  ■  MAY LOSE VALUE 

Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund  |  1


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
Andrew Owen
President
Wells Fargo Funds
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to offer you this annual report for the Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021. Despite the initial challenges presented by the spread of COVID-19 cases and the business restrictions implemented throughout much of the world, global stocks showed robust returns, supported by global stimulus programs, a rapid vaccination rollout, and recovering consumer and corporate sentiment. Bond markets mostly produced positive returns, as investors searched for yield and diversification during difficult market stretches.
For the 12-month period, equities had robust returns, as policymakers continued to fight the effects of COVID-19. Emerging market stocks led both non-U.S. developed market equities and U.S. stocks. Gains by fixed-income securities were varied, though mostly positive. For the period, U.S. stocks, based on the S&P 500 Index,1 gained 40.32%. International stocks, as measured by the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net),2 returned 42.78%, while the MSCI EM Index (Net),3 had stronger performance, with a 51.00% gain. Among bond indexes, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index,4 returned -0.40%, the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (unhedged),5 gained 7.84%, the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index,6 returned 4.74%, and the ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index,7 returned 15.18%.
The COVID-19 lockdown began over a year ago.
By June, economies started to reopen and global central banks committed to do all they could to provide economic support through liquidity and low borrowing costs. U.S. economic activity was aided by one-time $1,200 stimulus checks and $600 weekly bonus unemployment benefits that lasted through July. However, unemployment remained historically high and COVID-19 cases began to increase by late June. China’s economic recovery began to pick up momentum.
July was broadly positive for equities and fixed income. However, economic data and a resurgence of COVID-19 cases underscored the urgent need to regain control of the pandemic. Second-quarter gross domestic product (GDP) shrank from the previous quarter by 9.5% and 12.1% in the U.S. and the eurozone, respectively. In contrast, China’s second-quarter GDP grew 3.2% year over year. The U.S. economy added 1.8 million jobs in July, but a double-digit jobless rate persisted.

1 The S&P 500 Index consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. It is a market-value-weighted index with each stock's weight in the index proportionate to its market value. You cannot invest directly in an index.
2 The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) All Country World Index (ACWI) ex USA Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed and emerging markets, excluding the United States. Source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI. You cannot invest directly in an index.
3 The MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure equity market performance of emerging markets. You cannot invest directly in an index.
4 The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based benchmark that measures the investment-grade, U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage pass-throughs), asset-backed securities, and commercial mortgage-backed securities. You cannot invest directly in an index.
5 The Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (unhedged) is an unmanaged index that provides a broad-based measure of the global investment-grade fixed-income markets excluding the U.S. dollar-denominated debt market. You cannot invest directly in an index.
6 The Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index composed of long-term tax-exempt bonds with a minimum credit rating of Baa. You cannot invest directly in an index.
7 The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index of domestic and Yankee high-yield bonds. The index tracks the performance of high-yield securities traded in the U.S. bond market. You cannot invest directly in an index. Copyright 2021. ICE Data Indices, LLC. All rights reserved.

2  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
The stock market continued to rally in August despite concerns over rising numbers of U.S. and European COVID-19 cases as well as the July expiration of the $600 weekly bonus unemployment benefit. Relatively strong second-quarter earnings boosted investor sentiment along with the U.S. Federal Reserve Board’s (Fed’s) announcement of a monetary policy shift expected to support longer-term low interest rates. U.S. manufacturing and services activity indexes beat expectations while the U.S. housing market maintained strength. In Europe, retail sales expanded and consumer confidence was steady. China’s economy continued to expand.
Stocks grew more volatile in September on mixed economic data. U.S. economic activity continued to grow. However, U.S. unemployment remained elevated at 7.9% in September. With the U.S. Congress delaying further fiscal relief and uncertainties surrounding a possible vaccine, doubts crept back into the financial markets. In the U.K., a lack of progress in Brexit talks weighed on markets. China’s economy picked up steam, fueled by increased global demand.
In October, capital markets stepped back from their six-month rally. Market volatility rose in advance of the U.S. election and amid a global increase in COVID-19 infections. Europe introduced tighter restrictions affecting economic activity. U.S. markets looked favorably at the prospect of Democratic control of the federal purse strings, which could lead to additional fiscal stimulus and a boost to economic activity. Meanwhile, China reported 4.9% third-quarter GDP growth.
Global stocks rallied in November, propelled by optimism over three promising COVID-19 vaccines. Reversing recent trends, value stocks outperformed growth stocks and cyclical stocks outpaced information technology (IT) stocks. However, U.S. unemployment remained elevated, with a net job loss of 10 million since February. The eurozone services Purchasing Managers' Index, a monthly survey of purchasing managers, contracted sharply while the region’s manufacturing activity grew. The U.S. election results added to the upbeat mood as investors anticipated more consistent policies in the new administration.
Financial markets ended the year with strength on high expectations for a rapid rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines, the successful passage of a $900 billion stimulus package, and rising expectations of additional economic support from a Democratic-led Congress. U.S. economic data were mixed with still-elevated unemployment and weak retail sales but growth in manufacturing output. In contrast, China’s economic expansion continued in both manufacturing and nonmanufacturing. U.S. COVID-19 infection rates continued to rise even as new state and local lockdown measures were implemented.
The calendar year 2021 began with emerging market stocks leading all major asset classes in January, driven by China’s strong economic growth and a broad recovery in corporate earnings, which propelled China’s stock market higher. In the U.S., positive news on vaccine trials and January expansion in both the manufacturing and services sectors was offset by a weak December monthly jobs report. This was compounded by technical factors as some hedge funds were forced to sell stocks to protect themselves against a well-publicized short squeeze coordinated by a group of retail investors. Eurozone sentiment and economic growth were particularly weak, reflecting the impact of a new lockdown with stricter social distancing along with a slow vaccine rollout.
February saw major domestic equity indexes driven higher on the hope of a new stimulus bill, improving COVID-19 vaccination numbers, and the gradual reopening of the economy. Most S&P 500 companies reported better-than-expected earnings, with positive surprises coming from the financials, IT, health care, and materials sectors. Japan saw its economy strengthen as a result of strong export numbers. Meanwhile, crude oil prices continued their climb, rising more than 25% for the year. Domestic government bonds experienced a sharp sell-off in late February as markets priced in a more robust economic recovery and higher future growth and inflation expectations.
Global stocks rallied in November, propelled by optimism over three promising COVID-19 vaccines.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund  |  3


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
The passage of the massive domestic stimulus bill highlighted March activity, leading to increased forecasts for U.S. growth in 2021.
The passage of the massive domestic stimulus bill highlighted March activity, leading to increased forecasts for U.S. growth in 2021. Domestic employment surged as COVID-19 vaccinations and an increasingly open economy spurred hiring. A majority of U.S. small companies reported they were operating at pre-pandemic capacity or higher. Value stocks continued its outperformance of growth stocks in the month, continuing the trend that started in late 2020. Meanwhile, most major developed global equity indexes were up month to date on the back of rising optimism regarding the outlook for global growth. While the U.S. and U.K. have been the most successful in terms of the vaccine rollout, even in markets where the vaccine has lagged, such as in the eurozone and Japan, equity indexes in many of those countries have also been in positive territory this year.
Equity markets produced another strong showing in April. Domestically, the continued reopening of the economy had a strong impact on positive equity performance, as people started leaving their households and jobless claims continued to fall. Domestic corporate bonds performed well and the U.S. dollar weakened. Meanwhile, the U.S. government continued to seek to invest in the recovery, this time by outlining a package of over $2 billion to improve infrastructure. The primary headwind in April was inflation, as investors tried to determine the breadth and longevity of recent price increases. Developed Europe has been supported by a meaningful increase in the pace of vaccinations. Unfortunately many emerging market countries have not been as successful. India in particular has seen COVID-19 cases surge, serving as an example of the need to get vaccinations rolled out to less developed nations.
Vaccine rollouts continued in May, leading to loosened restrictions globally. As a result, equity markets in general saw a minor increase in returns. Concerns that the continued economic rebound could result in inflation increases becoming more than transitory were supported by the higher input costs businesses are experiencing. Meanwhile, those inflation concerns were tempered by the Fed, which stayed steady on its view of the economy and eased fears of a sudden and substantial policy change. Positive performance in the emerging market equity space was supported this month by steady consumer demand and strong commodity prices. Fixed-income markets were also slightly positive for the month, driven by inflation uncertainty and a softer U.S. dollar.
Don’t let short-term uncertainty derail long-term investment goals.
Periods of investment uncertainty can present challenges, but experience has taught us that maintaining long-term investment goals can be an effective way to plan for the future. Although diversification cannot guarantee an investment profit or prevent losses, we believe it can be an effective way to manage investment risk and potentially smooth out overall portfolio performance. We encourage investors to know their investments and to understand that appropriate levels of risk-taking may unlock opportunities.
Thank you for choosing to invest with Wells Fargo Funds. We appreciate your confidence in us and remain committed to helping you meet your financial needs.
Sincerely,
Andrew Owen
President
Wells Fargo Funds

For further information about your Fund, contact your investment professional, visit our website at wfam.com, or call us directly at 1-800-222-8222.

4  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
Preparing for LIBOR Transition
The global financial industry is preparing to transition away from the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), a key benchmark interest rate, to new alternative rates. LIBOR underpins more than $350 trillion of financial contracts. It is the benchmark rate for a wide spectrum of products ranging from residential mortgages to corporate bonds to derivatives. Regulators have called for a market-wide transition away from LIBOR to successor reference rates by the end of 2021 (expected to be extended through June 30, 2023 for most tenors of the U.S. dollar LIBOR), which requires proactive steps be taken by issuers, counterparties, and asset managers to identify impacted products and adopt new reference rates.
The Fund invests in an underlying fund that holds one or more securities that use LIBOR as a floating reference rate and has a maturity date after December 31, 2021.
Although the transition process away from LIBOR has become increasingly well-defined in advance of the anticipated discontinuation date, there remains uncertainty regarding the nature of successor reference rates, and any potential effects of the transition away from LIBOR on investment instruments that use it as a benchmark rate. The transition process may result in, among other things, increased volatility or illiquidity in markets for instruments that currently rely on LIBOR and could negatively impact the value of certain instruments held by the Fund.
Wells Fargo Asset Management is monitoring LIBOR exposure closely and has put resources and controls in place to manage this transition effectively. The Fund’s portfolio management team is evaluating LIBOR holdings to understand what happens to those securities when LIBOR ceases to exist, including examining security documentation to identify the presence or absence of fallback language identifying a replacement rate to LIBOR.
While the pace of transition away from LIBOR will differ by asset class and investment strategy, the portfolio management team will monitor market conditions for those holdings to identify and mitigate deterioration or volatility in pricing and liquidity and ensure appropriate actions are taken in a timely manner.
Further information regarding the potential risks associated with the discontinuation of LIBOR can be found in the Fund’s Statement of Additional Information.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund  |  5


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Investment objective The Fund seeks total return, consisting of income and capital appreciation.
Manager Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC
Subadviser for the affiliated master portfolio*
Wells Capital Management Incorporated
Portfolio managers Maulik Bhansali, CFA®, Jarad Vasquez
    
Average annual total returns (%) as of May 31, 2021
    Including sales charge   Excluding sales charge   Expense ratios1 (%)
  Inception date 1 year 5 year 10 year   1 year 5 year 10 year   Gross Net 2
Class A (MBFAX) 10-31-2001 -4.28 2.12 2.80   0.24 3 3.07 3.27   0.82 0.78
Class C (MBFCX) 10-31-2001 -1.52 2.30 2.50   -0.52 3 2.30 2.50   1.57 1.53
Class R (WTRRX) 7-9-2010   0.15 3 2.84 3.03   1.07 1.03
Class R4 (MBFRX)4 11-30-2012   0.55 3.35 3.55   0.59 0.52
Class R6 (WTRIX)5 11-30-2012   0.70 3.49 3.69   0.44 0.37
Administrator Class (MNTRX) 6-30-1997   0.30 3 3.13 3.36   0.76 0.70
Institutional Class (MBFIX) 10-31-2001   0.58 3.42 3.64   0.49 0.42
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index6   -0.40 3 3.25 3.29  
Figures quoted represent past performance, which is no guarantee of future results, and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder may pay on an investment in a fund. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance shown without sales charges would be lower if sales charges were reflected. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted, which assumes the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. Current month-end performance is available on the Fund’s website, wfam.com.
Index returns do not include transaction costs associated with buying and selling securities, any mutual fund fees or expenses, or any taxes. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
For Class A shares, the maximum front-end sales charge is 4.50%. For Class C shares, the maximum contingent deferred sales charge is 1.00%. Performance including a contingent deferred sales charge assumes the sales charge for the corresponding time period. Class R, Class R4, Class R6, Administrator Class, and Institutional Class shares are sold without a front-end sales charge or contingent deferred sales charge.
1 Reflects the expense ratios as stated in the most recent prospectuses. The expense ratios shown are subject to change and may differ from the annualized expense ratios shown in the financial highlights of this report.
2 The manager has contractually committed through September 30, 2021, to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers at 0.78% for Class A, 1.53% for Class C, 1.03% for Class R, 0.52% for Class R4, 0.37% for Class R6, 0.70% for Administrator Class, and 0.42% for Institutional Class. Brokerage commissions, stamp duty fees, interest, taxes, acquired fund fees and expenses (if any) from funds in which the affiliated master portfolio invests, and extraordinary expenses are excluded from the expense caps. Net expenses from the affiliated master portfolio are included in the expense caps. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. Without these caps, the Fund’s returns would have been lower. The expense ratio paid by an investor is the net expense ratio (the total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers) as stated in the prospectuses.
3 Total return differs from the return in the Financial Highlights in this report. The total return presented is calculated based on the NAV at which the shareholder transactions were processed. The NAV and total return presented in the Financial Highlights reflects certain adjustments made to the net assets of the Fund that are necessary under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
4 Historical performance shown for the Class R4 shares prior to their inception reflects the performance of the Institutional Class shares, and includes the higher expenses applicable to the Institutional Class shares. If these expenses had not been included, returns for the Class R4 shares would be higher.
5 Historical performance shown for the Class R6 shares prior to their inception reflects the performance of the Institutional Class shares, and includes the higher expenses applicable to the Institutional Class shares. If these expenses had not been included, returns for the Class R6 shares would be higher.

* The Fund is a feeder fund in a master-feeder structure that invests substantially all of its assets in a single affiliated master portfolio of the Wells Fargo Master Trust with a substantially identical investment objective and substantially similar investment strategies. References to the investment activities of the Fund are intended to refer to the investment activities of the affiliated master portfolio in which it invests.
CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.

6  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Growth of $10,000 investment as of May 31, 20211
1 The chart compares the performance of Class A shares for the most recent ten years with the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The chart assumes a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in Class A shares and reflects all operating expenses and assumes the maximum initial sales charge of 4.50%.
6 The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based benchmark that measures the investment-grade, U.S. dollar– denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage pass-throughs), asset-backed securities, and commercial mortgage-backed securities. You cannot invest directly in an index.
Bond values fluctuate in response to the financial condition of individual issuers, general market and economic conditions, and changes in interest rates. Changes in market conditions and government policies may lead to periods of heightened volatility in the bond market and reduced liquidity for certain bonds held by the Fund. In general, when interest rates rise, bond values fall and investors may lose principal value. Interest rate changes and their impact on the Fund and its share price can be sudden and unpredictable. The use of derivatives may reduce returns and/or increase volatility. Certain investment strategies tend to increase the total risk of an investment (relative to the broader market). Securities issued by U.S. government agencies or government-sponsored entities may not be guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury. This fund is exposed to foreign investment risk and mortgage- and asset-backed securities risk. Consult the Fund’s prospectus for additional information on these and other risks.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund  |  7


Performance highlights (unaudited)
MANAGER'S DISCUSSION
Fund highlights
The Fund (Class A, excluding sales charges) outperformed its benchmark, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021.
Security selection in credit and mortgage-backed securities (MBS), as well as overweights to these sectors, were the primary drivers of excess returns during the 12-month period.
A sector underweight to commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS), driven by our concerns around the fundamentals in the sector and the lack of security selection opportunities, detracted from performance versus the benchmark.
Reopening and stimulus measures set the stage for a strong 2nd half of 2021.
Increased confidence resulting from declining COVID-19 cases, rapidly accelerating vaccine availability, favorable studies on vaccine effectiveness, and implementation of the recent stimulus package should position the U.S. economy for a good second half. Manufacturing surveys indicate that one of the strongest recoveries in decades continues with increasing production, record order backlogs, and extremely light customer inventories. Services activity remains strong despite work-from-home constraints. Demand for durable goods like autos and housing remains robust, even after a strong second half of 2020, which benefited from catchup demand. The outlook for retail sales remains strong, even if February’s performance was muted ahead of the recent passage of the $1.9 trillion fiscal stimulus package. The Boeing Company’s resumption of 737 MAX deliveries is an encouraging sign for transportation-related sectors. Job growth remains solid as the economy reopens and employers gear up for anticipated demand. Further reopening of the economy, receipt of stimulus checks, and a rapid vaccination campaign creating a path toward herd immunity should also bode well for the months ahead.
Ten largest holdings (%) as of May 31, 20211
U.S. Treasury Note, 0.25%, 5-15-2024 2.65
FNMA, 2.50%, 8-12-2051 2.55
FNMA, 2.50%, 6-14-2051 1.71
U.S. Treasury Bond, 1.38%, 11-15-2040 1.51
U.S. Treasury Bond, 1.13%, 8-15-2040 1.43
U.S. Treasury Note, 0.13%, 1-15-2024 1.34
U.S. Treasury Note, 0.13%, 12-31-2022 1.31
U.S. Treasury Note, 0.50%, 2-28-2026 1.29
U.S. Treasury Bond, 1.13%, 5-15-2040 1.29
U.S. Treasury Note, 0.13%, 1-31-2023 1.27
1 Each holding represents the Fund’s allocable portion of the affiliated master portfolio security. Figures represent each holding as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets. Holdings are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
On an international basis, growth in China and Asia remains strong, while Europe and Latin America continue to have concerns around social distancing measures ahead of a more rapid rollout of vaccines, which is expected to lag the U.S. by at least one to two quarters.
Recent steepening of the yield curve has, to date, been interpreted as a healthy sign of optimism in the economy and has yet to challenge the performance of interest-sensitive sectors or overall market liquidity, although abrupt moves in Treasuries in late February and uneven auction results in March were noted by investors and policymakers alike. Indeed, while global policymakers have not signaled a strong willingness to support longer-term yields, responses are starting to be seen. Markets have been well supported by the Federal Reserve, as well as by fixed-income investors abroad who face less robust opportunities in their home markets of Asia and Europe.
The outlook for the economy looks good.
Return-to-office work and a more normal lifestyle following broad vaccine availability, pent-up demand, and a healthy consumer following recent stimulus payments should position the U.S. economy for a solid second quarter, on top of the first quarter’s 6.4% annualized growth rate, albeit with some uncertainty on the sustainability of the expansion. Manufacturing surveys indicate that a robust and broad-based expansion remains underway, with new orders continuing to accelerate, strengthening export demand, and rising backlogs tempered by supply chain bottlenecks and some slowing of consumption. Availability of critical resources like computer chips and commodities like copper, steel, and lumber remains a key concern. Services activity remains strong, especially as dining, travel, and tourism industries reopen as the U.S. population approaches herd immunity. Resumption of travel should benefit transportation-related sectors like aircraft manufacturing.
 

8  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund


Performance highlights (unaudited)
A combination of recently stronger-than-expected growth, potential concerns on supply bottlenecks and input costs, and price pressures could introduce questions on whether the U.S. economy is seeing early signs of overheating risks, at least for a short period. A sharp recent rise in the trade deficit highlights that global imbalances are rising, especially as U.S. consumption appears above trend at a time when demand for exports remains soft. Foreign partners like the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England are proceeding on earlier-than-expected tapering of asset purchases, with rate increases potentially to follow.
Portfolio composition as of May 31, 20211
1 Figures represent the portfolio composition of the affiliated master portfolio as a percentage of the long-term investments of the affiliated master portfolio. These amounts are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
Policymakers will also be grappling with macroprudential risk, which represents risk to the financial system as a whole, and and environmental, social and governance policy issues. Policymakers have signaled concerns with stretched equity valuations in some sectors, herd behavior from retail investors and unregulated market participants, and overall high-risk appetites. Tail risks in market structure, like the amount of capital dedicated by banks to trading and the robustness of nonbank financials, could be examined in the coming quarters. Restoration of fiscal anchors through higher corporate and personal income taxes are likely to be required to narrow the fiscal deficit, even if stimulus expectations are tempered. Lastly, a winding down of credit support programs could allow market participants to better price in risk versus reward in securities while reducing moral hazards. Assessment of longer-term policy challenges like historical inequities in society, lengthy durations of unemployment, and rising income inequality in the “K-shaped” recovery could be included in the debate, especially as food, gasoline, and housing prices are on the rise. Corporate announcements are anticipating shifts in regulations, especially on climate change, consumer protections, digital privacy, and antitrust and technology policy, providing risks and opportunities. At the same time, corporate margins could be pressured from input and wage costs and investments in supply chain integrity, compromising productivity.
While a smooth reopening of the economy would address many of these concerns, near-term expectations around the economy could become more volatile, even if second-quarter growth appears robust, posing a risk management challenge for public policy and portfolios alike. Consistent with our bottom-up process, we have reduced exposure to sectors where we see a less robust opportunity set relative to one year ago. As always, we maintain a neutral duration and we maintain our largest overweight to asset-backed securities, seeing value in high-quality segments of the market. We have reduced our exposure to credit and MBS during the year, as these markets have normalized relative to distressed conditions this time last year. We remain lightly positioned in CMBS, favoring other credit-related sectors and anticipating some dislocations in commercial real estate fundamentals as we move forward. We remain nimble and agile, and we stand ready to take advantage of security selection opportunities where they arise.
 

Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund  |  9


Fund expenses (unaudited)
As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and contingent deferred sales charges (if any) on redemptions and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) and/or shareholder servicing fees, and other Fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period from December 1, 2020 to May 31, 2021.
Actual expenses
The “Actual” line of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the “Actual” line under the heading entitled “Expenses paid during period” for your applicable class of shares to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes
The “Hypothetical” line of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) and contingent deferred sales charges. Therefore, the “Hypothetical” line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
  Beginning
account value
12-1-2020
Ending
account value
5-31-2021
Expenses
paid during
the period1,2
Annualized net
expense ratio2
Class A        
Actual $1,000.00 $ 976.85 $3.84 0.78%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,021.04 $3.93 0.78%
Class C        
Actual $1,000.00 $ 972.93 $7.53 1.53%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,017.30 $7.70 1.53%
Class R        
Actual $1,000.00 $ 976.82 $3.99 0.81%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,020.89 $4.08 0.81%
Class R4        
Actual $1,000.00 $ 978.18 $2.56 0.52%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,022.34 $2.62 0.52%
Class R6        
Actual $1,000.00 $ 978.85 $1.83 0.37%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,023.09 $1.87 0.37%
Administrator Class        
Actual $1,000.00 $ 977.25 $3.45 0.70%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,021.44 $3.53 0.70%
Institutional Class        
Actual $1,000.00 $ 977.90 $2.07 0.42%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,022.84 $2.12 0.42%
1 Expenses paid is equal to the annualized net expense ratio of each class multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one-half-year period).
2 Amounts reflect net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio in which the Fund invests.

10  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund


Fund expenses (unaudited)

Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund  |  11


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

          Value
Investment companies:  100.02%          
Affiliated master portfolio:  100.02%          
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio         $5,331,353,094
Total Investment companies (Cost $5,321,216,119)         5,331,353,094
Total investments in securities (Cost $5,321,216,119) 100.02%       5,331,353,094
Other assets and liabilities, net (0.02)            (969,956)
Total net assets 100.00%       $5,330,383,138
Transactions with the affiliated Master Portfolio were as follows:
  % of
ownership,
beginning
of period
% of
ownership,
end of
period
Net realized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Interest
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Affiliated
income
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Value,
end of
period
% of
net
assets
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio 94.84% 94.49% $124,275,417 $(163,776,116) $93,220,696 $173,474 $5,331,353,094 100.02%
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

12  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund


Statement of assets and liabilities—May 31, 2021
   
Assets  
Investments in affiliated Master Portfolio, at value (cost $5,321,216,119)

$ 5,331,353,094
Receivable for Fund shares sold

7,316,204
Receivable from manager

69,380
Prepaid expenses and other assets

16,954
Total assets

5,338,755,632
Liabilities  
Payable for Fund shares redeemed

6,989,608
Dividends payable

696,813
Administration fees payable

310,070
Distribution fees payable

8,728
Accrued expenses and other liabilities

367,275
Total liabilities

8,372,494
Total net assets

$5,330,383,138
Net assets consist of  
Paid-in capital

$ 5,311,862,299
Total distributable earnings

18,520,839
Total net assets

$5,330,383,138
Computation of net asset value and offering price per share  
Net assets – Class A

$ 370,881,746
Shares outstanding – Class A1

27,620,111
Net asset value per share – Class A

$13.43
Maximum offering price per share – Class A2

$14.06
Net assets – Class C

$ 13,398,588
Shares outstanding – Class C1

1,008,016
Net asset value per share – Class C

$13.29
Net assets – Class R

$ 1,715,529
Shares outstanding – Class R1

131,062
Net asset value per share – Class R

$13.09
Net assets – Class R4

$ 1,780,289
Shares outstanding – Class R41

135,980
Net asset value per share – Class R4

$13.09
Net assets – Class R6

$ 1,978,164,096
Shares outstanding – Class R61

151,247,500
Net asset value per share – Class R6

$13.08
Net assets – Administrator Class

$ 214,796,136
Shares outstanding – Administrator Class1

16,406,572
Net asset value per share – Administrator Class

$13.09
Net assets – Institutional Class

$ 2,749,646,754
Shares outstanding – Institutional Class1

210,320,017
Net asset value per share – Institutional Class

$13.07
1 The Fund has an unlimited number of authorized shares.
2 Maximum offering price is computed as 100/95.50 of net asset value. On investments of $50,000 or more, the offering price is reduced.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund  |  13


Statement of operations—year ended May 31, 2021
   
Investment income  
Interest allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio (net of foreign withholding taxes of $2,091)

$ 93,220,696
Affiliated income allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

173,474
Expenses allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

(19,735,188)
Total investment income

73,658,982
Expenses  
Management fee

2,763,146
Administration fees  
Class A

538,805
Class C

31,113
Class R

3,445
Class R4

2,750
Class R6

717,379
Administrator Class

230,844
Institutional Class

2,139,946
Shareholder servicing fees  
Class A

839,615
Class C

48,454
Class R

2,964
Class R4

3,430
Administrator Class

565,875
Distribution fees  
Class C

145,226
Class R

3,535
Custody and accounting fees

170,996
Professional fees

33,780
Registration fees

166,928
Shareholder report expenses

284,769
Trustees’ fees and expenses

21,080
Other fees and expenses

100,644
Total expenses

8,814,724
Less: Fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements  
Fund-level

(2,290,291)
Class A

(16,030)
Class C

(3)
Class R4

(1,084)
Class R6

(717,379)
Administrator Class

(40,789)
Institutional Class

(845,258)
Net expenses

4,903,890
Net investment income

68,755,092
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments  
Net realized gains on securities transactions allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

124,275,417
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on securities transactions allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

(163,776,116)
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

(39,500,699)
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

$ 29,254,393
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

14  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund


Statement of changes in net assets
         
  Year ended
May 31, 2021
Year ended
May 31, 2020
Operations        
Net investment income

  $ 68,755,092   $ 120,113,953
Net realized gains on investments

  124,275,417   306,742,964
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

  (163,776,116)   56,934,677
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

  29,254,393   483,791,594
Distributions to shareholders from        
Net investment income and net realized gains        
Class A

  (18,390,567)   (6,294,414)
Class C

  (826,028)   (417,858)
Class R

  (109,006)   (97,982)
Class R4

  (255,450)   (161,109)
Class R6

  (147,643,160)   (63,508,068)
Administrator Class

  (13,932,917)   (4,506,235)
Institutional Class

  (162,044,711)   (59,496,339)
Total distributions to shareholders

  (343,201,839)   (134,482,005)
Capital share transactions Shares   Shares  
Proceeds from shares sold        
Class A

12,273,258 169,431,477 5,035,376 68,831,957
Class C

429,511 6,062,121 737,031 9,984,279
Class R

42,683 585,880 91,423 1,215,599
Class R4

73,596 1,019,265 183,129 2,446,252
Class R6

41,373,976 564,946,588 46,956,601 627,133,874
Administrator Class

7,772,437 107,461,106 5,387,937 72,239,222
Institutional Class

91,169,096 1,242,662,922 67,880,909 903,670,274
    2,092,169,359   1,685,521,457
Reinvestment of distributions        
Class A

1,173,633 16,238,069 399,765 5,475,932
Class C

58,078 794,241 14,131 191,525
Class R

5,020 67,665 1,589 21,221
Class R4

18,865 254,704 12,039 160,382
Class R6

8,211,303 110,794,663 3,578,858 47,809,034
Administrator Class

991,907 13,386,686 324,731 4,342,589
Institutional Class

11,300,587 152,228,735 3,940,416 52,636,436
    293,764,763   110,637,119
Payment for shares redeemed        
Class A

(6,969,911) (96,545,555) (7,058,184) (96,112,855)
Class C

(1,472,599) (20,765,992) (1,381,669) (18,673,889)
Class R

(150,925) (2,094,716) (519,677) (6,891,248)
Class R4

(285,459) (3,858,168) (700,264) (9,317,864)
Class R6

(82,522,155) (1,114,913,998) (60,509,001) (803,022,923)
Administrator Class

(8,154,991) (111,662,175) (5,797,513) (77,110,768)
Institutional Class

(63,368,919) (856,440,756) (81,653,483) (1,088,476,808)
    (2,206,281,360)   (2,099,606,355)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from capital share transactions

  179,652,762   (303,447,779)
Total increase (decrease) in net assets

  (134,294,684)   45,861,810
Net assets        
Beginning of period

  5,464,677,822   5,418,816,012
End of period

  $ 5,330,383,138   $ 5,464,677,822
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund  |  15


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class A 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$14.17 $13.28 $12.86 $13.22 $13.28
Net investment income

0.12 1 0.25 0.32 0.24 0.19 1
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

(0.06) 0.93 0.42 (0.36) 0.00
Total from investment operations

0.06 1.18 0.74 (0.12) 0.19
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.15) (0.26) (0.32) (0.24) (0.19)
Net realized gains

(0.65) (0.03) 0.00 0.00 (0.06)
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.80) (0.29) (0.32) (0.24) (0.25)
Net asset value, end of period

$13.43 $14.17 $13.28 $12.86 $13.22
Total return2

0.31% 9.03% 5.87% (0.96)% 1.48%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

0.82% 0.82% 0.83% 0.83% 0.83%
Net expenses

0.78% 0.78% 0.78% 0.78% 0.78%
Net investment income

0.87% 1.85% 2.50% 1.79% 1.40%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate3

457% 603% 577% 542% 614%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$370,882 $299,642 $302,246 $320,208 $360,276
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.35%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges.
3 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

16  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class C 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$14.03 $13.15 $12.74 $13.09 $13.15
Net investment income

0.03 0.15 0.23 0.14 0.09
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

(0.07) 0.92 0.40 (0.35) 0.00
Total from investment operations

(0.04) 1.07 0.63 (0.21) 0.09
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.05) (0.16) (0.22) (0.14) (0.09)
Net realized gains

(0.65) (0.03) 0.00 0.00 (0.06)
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.70) (0.19) (0.22) (0.14) (0.15)
Net asset value, end of period

$13.29 $14.03 $13.15 $12.74 $13.09
Total return1

(0.45)% 8.22% 5.04% (1.65)% 0.72%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

1.57% 1.57% 1.58% 1.58% 1.58%
Net expenses

1.53% 1.53% 1.53% 1.53% 1.53%
Net investment income

0.16% 1.11% 1.75% 1.04% 0.68%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate2

457% 603% 577% 542% 614%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$13,399 $27,971 $34,494 $47,843 $59,049
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.35%
    
1 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges.
2 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund  |  17


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class R 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$13.83 $12.96 $12.55 $12.90 $12.97
Net investment income

0.11 1 0.22 1 0.28 1 0.20 1 0.15 1
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

(0.06) 0.90 0.41 (0.35) (0.01)
Total from investment operations

0.05 1.12 0.69 (0.15) 0.14
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.14) (0.22) (0.28) (0.20) (0.15)
Net realized gains

(0.65) (0.03) 0.00 0.00 (0.06)
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.79) (0.25) (0.28) (0.20) (0.21)
Net asset value, end of period

$13.09 $13.83 $12.96 $12.55 $12.90
Total return

0.22% 8.80% 5.61% (1.19)% 1.15%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

0.87% 1.05% 1.07% 1.08% 1.08%
Net expenses

0.86% 1.02% 1.03% 1.03% 1.03%
Net investment income

0.81% 1.66% 2.25% 1.54% 1.18%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate2

457% 603% 577% 542% 614%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$1,716 $3,241 $8,565 $12,230 $13,826
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.35%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

18  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class R4 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$13.83 $12.95 $12.55 $12.89 $12.95
Net investment income

0.16 1 0.29 1 0.35 0.26 1 0.22
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

(0.06) 0.91 0.40 (0.34) 0.00
Total from investment operations

0.10 1.20 0.75 (0.08) 0.22
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.19) (0.29) (0.35) (0.26) (0.22)
Net realized gains

(0.65) (0.03) 0.00 0.00 (0.06)
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.84) (0.32) (0.35) (0.26) (0.28)
Net asset value, end of period

$13.09 $13.83 $12.95 $12.55 $12.89
Total return

0.55% 9.34% 6.07% (0.61)% 1.74%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

0.59% 0.59% 0.60% 0.60% 0.60%
Net expenses

0.52% 0.52% 0.52% 0.52% 0.52%
Net investment income

1.16% 2.19% 2.76% 2.01% 1.70%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate2

457% 603% 577% 542% 614%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$1,780 $4,549 $10,805 $11,680 $43,205
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.35%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund  |  19


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class R6 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$13.82 $12.95 $12.54 $12.89 $12.95
Net investment income

0.18 1 0.30 0.37 0.28 0.24
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

(0.06) 0.91 0.41 (0.35) 0.00
Total from investment operations

0.12 1.21 0.78 0.00 0.24
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.21) (0.31) (0.37) (0.28) (0.24)
Net realized gains

(0.65) (0.03) 0.00 0.00 (0.06)
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.86) (0.34) (0.37) (0.28) (0.30)
Net asset value, end of period

$13.08 $13.82 $12.95 $12.54 $12.89
Total return

0.70% 9.42% 6.31% (0.54)% 1.90%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

0.44% 0.44% 0.45% 0.45% 0.45%
Net expenses

0.37% 0.37% 0.37% 0.37% 0.37%
Net investment income

1.29% 2.26% 2.92% 2.24% 1.87%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate2

457% 603% 577% 542% 614%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$1,978,164 $2,545,332 $2,513,644 $1,360,847 $797,896
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.35%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

20  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Administrator Class 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$13.83 $12.96 $12.56 $12.90 $12.97
Net investment income

0.13 0.26 0.33 1 0.24 1 0.21
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

(0.06) 0.90 0.40 (0.34) (0.02)
Total from investment operations

0.07 1.16 0.73 (0.10) 0.19
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.16) (0.26) (0.33) (0.24) (0.20)
Net realized gains

(0.65) (0.03) 0.00 0.00 (0.06)
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.81) (0.29) (0.33) (0.24) (0.26)
Net asset value, end of period

$13.09 $13.83 $12.96 $12.56 $12.90
Total return

0.37% 9.14% 5.87% (0.79)% 1.48%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

0.76% 0.76% 0.76% 0.77% 0.77%
Net expenses

0.70% 0.70% 0.70% 0.70% 0.70%
Net investment income

0.95% 1.92% 2.58% 1.86% 1.50%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate2

457% 603% 577% 542% 614%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$214,796 $218,522 $205,825 $269,057 $373,042
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.35%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund  |  21


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Institutional Class 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$13.82 $12.94 $12.54 $12.88 $12.95
Net investment income

0.17 0.29 0.36 0.28 0.23
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

(0.07) 0.92 0.40 (0.34) (0.01)
Total from investment operations

0.10 1.21 0.76 (0.06) 0.22
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.20) (0.30) (0.36) (0.28) (0.23)
Net realized gains

(0.65) (0.03) 0.00 0.00 (0.06)
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.85) (0.33) (0.36) (0.28) (0.29)
Net asset value, end of period

$13.07 $13.82 $12.94 $12.54 $12.88
Total return

0.58% 9.45% 6.18% (0.51)% 1.77%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

0.49% 0.49% 0.50% 0.50% 0.50%
Net expenses

0.42% 0.42% 0.42% 0.42% 0.42%
Net investment income

1.22% 2.21% 2.86% 2.16% 1.82%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate1

457% 603% 577% 542% 614%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$2,749,647 $2,365,421 $2,343,238 $3,318,290 $3,166,348
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.35%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.35%
    
1 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

22  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund


Notes to financial statements
1. ORGANIZATION
Wells Fargo Funds Trust (the "Trust"), a Delaware statutory trust organized on March 10, 1999, is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). As an investment company, the Trust follows the accounting and reporting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, Financial Services – Investment Companies. These financial statements report on the Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund (the "Fund") which is a diversified series of the Trust.
The Fund is a feeder fund in a master-feeder structure that invests substantially all of its assets in a single master portfolio with a substantially identical investment objective and substantially similar investment strategies. The Fund invests in Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio, a separate diversified portfolio (the “affiliated Master Portfolio”) of Wells Fargo Master Trust, a registered open-end management investment company. As of May 31, 2021, the Fund owned 94.49% of Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio. The affiliated Master Portfolio directly acquires portfolio securities and the Fund acquires an indirect interest in those securities. The Fund accounts for its investment in the affiliated Master Portfolio as a partnership investment and records on a daily basis its share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s income, expense and realized and unrealized gains and losses. The financial statements of the affiliated Master Portfolio for the year ended May 31, 2021 are included in this report and should be read in conjunction with the Fund’s financial statements.
On February 23, 2021, Wells Fargo & Company announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management ("WFAM") to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. WFAM is the trade name used by the asset management businesses of Wells Fargo & Company and includes Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the investment manager to the Fund, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, both registered investment advisers providing sub-advisory services to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Fund's principal underwriter. As part of the transaction, Wells Fargo & Company will own a 9.9% equity interest and will continue to serve as an important client and distribution partner.
Consummation of the transaction will result in the automatic termination of the Fund's investment management agreement and subadvisory agreement. The Fund's Board of Trustees approved a new investment management and new subadvisory agreement and approved submitting the agreements to the Fund’s shareholders for approval at a special meeting of shareholders expected to be held on August 16, 2021. Shareholders of record of the Fund at the close of business on May 28, 2021 are entitled to vote at the meeting. If shareholders approve the new agreements, they would take effect upon the closing of the transaction. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
This shareholder report is not asking you for a proxy. A separate proxy statement with more detailed information about the transaction will be provided to Fund shareholders and should be reviewed carefully.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following significant accounting policies, which are consistently followed in the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund, are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Securities valuation
All investments are valued each business day as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4 p.m. Eastern Time), although the Fund may deviate from this calculation time under unusual or unexpected circumstances.
Investments in the affiliated Master Portfolio are valued daily based on the Fund’s proportionate share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s net assets, which are also valued daily. Securities held in the affiliated Master Portfolio are valued as discussed in the Notes to Financial Statements of the affiliated Master Portfolio, which are included elsewhere in this report.
Investments which are not valued using any of the methods discussed above are valued at their fair value, as determined in good faith by the Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees has established a Valuation Committee comprised of the Trustees and has delegated to it the authority to take any actions regarding the valuation of portfolio securities that the Valuation Committee deems necessary or appropriate, including determining the fair value of portfolio securities, unless the determination has been delegated to the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee at Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC ("Funds Management"). The Board of Trustees retains the authority to make or ratify any valuation decisions or approve any changes to the Valuation Procedures as it deems appropriate. On a quarterly basis, the Board of Trustees

Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund  |  23


Notes to financial statements
receives reports on any valuation actions taken by the Valuation Committee or the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee which may include items for ratification.
Investment transactions, income and expenses
Investments in the affiliated Master Portfolio are recorded on a trade date basis. The Fund records daily its proportionate share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s income, expenses and realized and unrealized gains or losses. The Fund also accrues its own expenses.
Distributions to shareholders
Distributions to shareholders from net investement income are declared daily and paid monthly. Distributions from net realized gains, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date and paid at least annually. Such distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations and may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Dividend sources are estimated at the time of declaration. The tax character of distributions is determined as of the Fund's fiscal year end. Therefore, a portion of the Fund's distributions made prior to the Fund’s fiscal year end may be categorized as a tax return of capital at year end.
Federal and other taxes
The Fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by distributing substantially all of its investment company taxable income and any net realized capital gains (after reduction for capital loss carryforwards) sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes. Accordingly, no provision for federal income taxes was required.
The Fund’s income and federal excise tax returns and all financial records supporting those returns for the prior three fiscal years are subject to examination by the federal and Delaware revenue authorities. Management has analyzed the Fund's tax positions taken on federal, state, and foreign tax returns for all open tax years and does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability.
As of May 31, 2021, the aggregate cost of all investments for federal income tax purposes was $5,334,783,324 and the unrealized gains (losses) consisted of:
Gross unrealized gains $ 10,137,192
Gross unrealized losses (13,567,422)
Net unrealized losses $ (3,430,230)
Class allocations
The separate classes of shares offered by the Fund differ principally in applicable sales charges, distribution, shareholder servicing, and administration fees. Class specific expenses are charged directly to that share class. Investment income, common fund-level expenses, and realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative proportion of net assets of each class.
3. FAIR VALUATION MEASUREMENTS
At May 31, 2021, the Fund’s investment in an affiliated Master Portfolio was measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient. The investment objective and fair value of the affiliated Master Portfolio is as follows:
Affiliated Master Portfolio Investment objective Fair value of affiliated
Master Portfolio
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio Seeks total return, consisting of income and capital appreciation $5,331,353,094
The affiliated Master Portfolio does not have a redemption period notice, can be redeemed daily and does not have any unfunded commitments.
4. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
Management fee
Funds Management, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company ("Wells Fargo"), is the manager of the Fund and provides advisory and fund-level administrative services under an investment management agreement. Under the investment management agreement, Funds Management is responsible for, among other services, implementing the investment objectives and strategies of the Fund and providing fund-level administrative services in connection with the Fund’s

24  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund


Notes to financial statements
operations. As long as the Fund continues to invest substantially all of its assets in a single affiliated Master Portfolio, the Fund pays Funds Management an investment management fee only for fund-level administrative services at the following annual rate based on the Fund’s average daily net assets:
Average daily net assets Management fee
First $5 billion 0.050%
Next $5 billion 0.040
Over $10 billion 0.030
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the management fee was equivalent to an annual rate of 0.05% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
Funds Management also serves as the adviser to the affiliated Master Portfolio and is entitled to receive a fee from the affiliated Master Portfolio for those services.
Administration fees
Under a class-level administration agreement, Funds Management provides class-level administrative services to the Fund, which includes paying fees and expenses for services provided by the transfer agent, sub-transfer agents, omnibus account servicers and record-keepers. As compensation for its services under the class-level administration agreement, Funds Management receives an annual fee which is calculated based on the average daily net assets of each class as follows:
  Class-level
administration fee
Class A 0.16%
Class C 0.16
Class R 0.16
Class R4 0.08
Class R6 0.03
Administrator Class 0.10
Institutional Class 0.08
Waivers and/or expense reimbursements
Funds Management has contractually waived and/or reimbursed management and administration fees to the extent necessary to maintain certain net operating expense ratios for the Fund. When each class of the Fund has exceeded its expense cap, Funds Management has waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses from fund-level expenses on a proportionate basis and then from class specific expenses. When only certain classes exceed their expense caps, waivers and/or reimbursements are applied against class specific expenses before fund-level expenses. Net expenses from the affiliated Master Portfolio are included in the expense caps. Funds Management has committed through September 30, 2021 to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap expenses. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. The contractual expense caps are as follows:
  Expense ratio caps
Class A 0.78%
Class C 1.53
Class R 1.03
Class R4 0.52
Class R6 0.37
Administrator Class 0.70
Institutional Class 0.42

Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund  |  25


Notes to financial statements
Distribution fees
The Trust has adopted a distribution plan for Class C and Class R shares of the Fund pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Distribution fees are charged to Class C and Class R shares and paid to Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC ("Funds Distributor"), the principal underwriter, at an annual rate of 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class C shares and 0.25% of the average daily net assets of Class R shares.
In addition, Funds Distributor is entitled to receive the front-end sales charge from the purchase of Class A shares and a contingent deferred sales charge on the redemption of certain Class A shares. Funds Distributor is also entitled to receive the contingent deferred sales charges from redemptions of Class C shares. For the year ended May 31, 2021, Funds Distributor received $7,819 from the sale of Class A shares and $372 in contingent deferred sales charges from redemptions of Class C shares. No contingent deferred sales charges were incurred by Class A shares for the year ended May 31, 2021.
Shareholder servicing fees
The Trust has entered into contracts with one or more shareholder servicing agents, whereby Class A, Class C, Class R, and Administrator Class of the Fund are charged a fee at an annual rate of 0.25% of the average daily net assets of each respective class. Class R4 is charged a fee at an annual rate of 0.10% of its average daily net assets. A portion of these total shareholder servicing fees were paid to affiliates of Wells Fargo.
5. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS
The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing substantially all of its assets in a single affiliated Master Portfolio. Purchases and sales have been calculated by multiplying the Fund's ownership percentage of the affiliated Master Portfolio by the affiliated Master Portfolio's purchases and sales. Purchases and sales of investments, excluding U.S. government obligations (if any) and short-term securities, for the year ended May 31, 2021 were as follows:
Purchases at cost   Sales proceeds
U.S.
government
Non-U.S.
government
  U.S.
government
Non-U.S.
government
$24,128,962,774 $3,853,196,281   $23,265,402,446 $3,987,508,043
6. BANK BORROWINGS
The Trust (excluding the money market funds), Wells Fargo Master Trust and Wells Fargo Variable Trust are parties to a $350,000,000 revolving credit agreement whereby the Fund is permitted to use bank borrowings for temporary or emergency purposes, such as to fund shareholder redemption requests. Interest under the credit agreement is charged to the Fund based on a borrowing rate equal to the higher of the Federal Funds rate in effect on that day plus 1.25% or the overnight LIBOR rate in effect on that day plus 1.25%. In addition, an annual commitment fee equal to 0.25% of the unused balance is allocated to each participating fund.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, there were no borrowings by the Fund under the agreement.
7. DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS
The tax character of distributions paid during the years ended May 31, 2021 and May 31, 2020 were as follows:
  Year ended May 31
  2021 2020
Ordinary income $291,084,924 $134,482,005
Long-term capital gain 52,116,915 0
As of May 31, 2021, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Undistributed
ordinary
income
Undistributed
long-term
gain
Unrealized
losses
$9,052,659 $13,678,678 $(3,430,230)

26  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund


Notes to financial statements
8. INDEMNIFICATION
Under the Fund's organizational documents, the officers and Trustees have been granted certain indemnification rights against certain liabilities that may arise out of performance of their duties to the Fund. The Fund has entered into a separate agreement with each Trustee that converts indemnification rights currently existing under the Fund’s organizational documents into contractual rights that cannot be changed in the future without the consent of the Trustee. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with service providers that contain a variety of indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent on future claims that may be made against the Fund and, therefore, cannot be estimated.
9. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
In August 2018, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 updates the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Management has adopted this guidance which did not have a material impact on the financial statements.
10. CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization announced that it had made the assessment that coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) is a pandemic. The impacts of COVID-19 are affecting the entire global economy, individual companies and investment products, the funds, and the market in general. There is significant uncertainty around the extent and duration of business disruptions related to COVID-19 and the impacts may last for an extended period of time. COVID-19 has led to significant uncertainty and volatility in the financial markets.
11. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
At a meeting held July 15, 2021, the Board of Trustees of the Wells Fargo Funds approved a change in the Fund's name to remove “Wells Fargo” from the Fund's name and replace with “Allspring”. The change is expected to go into effect on October 11, 2021.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) announced that it will be changing its company name to Allspring Global Investments upon the closing of the previously announced sale transaction of WFAM by Wells Fargo & Company to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. The new corporate name is expected to go into effect on the closing date of the transaction, which is anticipated to occur in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
Following the closing of the transaction, Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the Fund's investment manager, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, each sub-advisers to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Fund's principal underwriter, will each be rebranded as Allspring.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund  |  27


Report of independent registered public accounting firm
To the Shareholders of the Fund and Board of Trustees
Wells Fargo Funds Trust:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund (the Fund), one of the funds constituting Wells Fargo Funds Trust, including the portfolio of investments, as of May 31, 2021, the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the financial statements) and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of May 31, 2021, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Fund in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and financial highlights, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. Such procedures also included confirmation of securities owned as of May 31, 2021, by correspondence with the transfer agent. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and financial highlights. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have not been able to determine the specific year that we began serving as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies; however, we are aware that we have served as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies since at least 1955.
Boston, Massachusetts
July 28, 2021

28  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Agency securities: 31.41%            
FHLMC (1 Month LIBOR +0.35%) ±   0.45% 12-15-2048 $     848,963 $       854,599
FHLMC   1.75 5-15-2043     2,571,675     2,638,820
FHLMC   2.00 12-1-2050     5,812,356     5,892,506
FHLMC   2.50 1-1-2036    16,586,615    17,494,665
FHLMC (12 Month LIBOR +1.64%) ±   2.83 5-1-2049     3,796,313     3,964,222
FHLMC   3.00 10-15-2047     8,158,533     8,492,501
FHLMC   3.00 5-15-2050     5,310,761     5,694,732
FHLMC   3.50 4-1-2049     3,766,913     4,079,179
FHLMC   4.00 1-1-2035       133,130       145,999
FHLMC   4.00 1-1-2036       248,778       271,950
FHLMC   4.00 10-1-2036     1,498,157     1,637,399
FHLMC   4.00 3-1-2037       187,970       206,184
FHLMC   4.00 3-1-2037       231,880       255,815
FHLMC   4.00 3-1-2037       321,372       350,168
FHLMC   4.00 4-1-2037     1,977,405     2,166,752
FHLMC   4.00 4-1-2037     1,571,068     1,720,114
FHLMC   4.00 8-1-2038     9,484,077    10,190,772
FHLMC   4.00 11-1-2048     9,119,394     9,997,463
FHLMC   4.00 7-1-2049    12,092,343    13,501,820
FHLMC   4.50 6-1-2039       201,664       225,210
FHLMC   4.50 7-1-2039       260,600       295,913
FHLMC   4.50 11-1-2048     5,316,182     5,869,263
FHLMC   4.50 3-1-2049     2,267,710     2,522,153
FHLMC   4.50 8-1-2049   18,980,319 20,886,427
FHLMC   5.00 5-1-2048   6,567,728 7,416,650
FHLMC   5.00 3-1-2049   12,265,366 13,664,675
FHLMC Series 1897 Class K   7.00 9-15-2026   241 267
FHLMC Series 264 Class 30   3.00 7-15-2042   9,215,999 9,584,959
FHLMC Series 4426 Class QC   1.75 7-15-2037   4,534,816 4,668,092
FHLMC Series 4705 Class A   4.50 9-15-2042   882,956 909,283
FHLMC Series 4763 Class CA   3.00 9-15-2038   1,217,843 1,305,258
FHLMC Series 4767 Class KA   3.00 3-15-2048   3,291,224 3,528,550
FHLMC Series 5091 Class AB   1.50 3-25-2051   12,100,402 12,177,557
FHLMC Series 5092 Class DT   1.50 11-25-2049   12,764,107 12,908,723
FHLMC Series 5119 Class AB   1.50 8-25-2049   6,162,562 6,185,912
FNMA   1.50 1-25-2043   3,357,498 3,404,166
FNMA   1.50 1-25-2043   9,509,457 9,685,012
FNMA   1.50 4-25-2043   982,698 996,798
FNMA   1.70 8-25-2033   11,544,356 11,971,145
FNMA   1.75 5-25-2043   3,600,071 3,726,705
FNMA   1.75 6-25-2046   22,538,318 22,909,413
FNMA   2.00 5-1-2031   2,949,175 3,066,742
FNMA   2.00 5-1-2031   2,943,186 3,060,522
FNMA   2.00 5-1-2036   48,437,657 50,076,432
FNMA %%   2.00 6-17-2036   36,300,000 37,501,035
FNMA   2.00 6-25-2038   11,689,424 12,218,357
FNMA   2.00 4-1-2051   11,343,217 11,486,123
FNMA   2.00 4-1-2051   24,463,905 24,801,202
FNMA %%   2.00 6-14-2051   5,400,000 5,453,685
FNMA %%   2.00 8-12-2051   65,300,000 65,663,500
FNMA   2.50 2-1-2036   11,842,855 12,539,131
FNMA   2.50 3-1-2036   9,504,510 10,075,587
FNMA   2.50 3-1-2036   15,392,661 16,297,811
FNMA   2.50 4-1-2036   3,398,623 3,602,792
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio  |  29


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Agency securities (continued)            
FNMA   2.50% 5-1-2036 $  18,069,848 $   19,132,589
FNMA   2.50 5-1-2036    11,378,768    12,062,518
FNMA   2.50 5-1-2036    11,615,393    12,315,563
FNMA   2.50 11-25-2044     2,245,142     2,390,267
FNMA %%   2.50 7-14-2050    62,200,000    64,256,744
FNMA   2.50 10-1-2050    38,534,457    40,013,227
FNMA %%   2.50 6-14-2051    93,000,000    96,278,633
FNMA %%   2.50 8-12-2051   139,800,000   144,095,057
FNMA (12 Month LIBOR +1.59%) ±   2.70 1-1-2046     9,227,924     9,633,832
FNMA (12 Month LIBOR +1.58%) ±   2.77 6-1-2045     2,806,869     2,924,451
FNMA   3.00 1-1-2043     6,343,390     6,786,886
FNMA   3.00 11-25-2043     2,401,506     2,481,588
FNMA   3.00 5-25-2048     8,121,060     8,636,627
FNMA   3.00 7-25-2049     3,226,128     3,380,174
FNMA   3.00 12-1-2054    26,735,307    28,478,510
FNMA   3.00 7-1-2060    34,063,737    36,496,365
FNMA   3.00 7-1-2060    27,429,130    29,188,960
FNMA   3.50 6-1-2049     1,405,226     1,494,824
FNMA   4.00 9-1-2033     2,789,008     2,983,842
FNMA   4.00 12-1-2036       262,416       287,269
FNMA   4.00 10-1-2037     1,687,757     1,843,555
FNMA   4.00 9-1-2045       991,342     1,104,786
FNMA   4.00 1-1-2046     6,320,220     7,042,352
FNMA   4.00 2-1-2047   4,099,003 4,517,657
FNMA   4.00 4-1-2047   638,498 707,084
FNMA   4.00 4-1-2047   596,107 662,470
FNMA   4.00 4-1-2047   523,287 562,923
FNMA   4.00 10-1-2047   636,818 707,721
FNMA   4.00 10-1-2047   590,965 653,297
FNMA   4.00 7-1-2048   21,752,791 23,864,314
FNMA   4.00 9-1-2048   4,662,311 5,103,804
FNMA   4.00 10-1-2048   3,897,662 4,267,301
FNMA   4.00 11-1-2048   4,156,989 4,551,229
FNMA   4.00 12-1-2048   3,351,569 3,722,476
FNMA   4.00 2-1-2049   4,946,884 5,452,413
FNMA   4.00 5-1-2049   377,993 413,183
FNMA   4.00 5-1-2049   3,089,993 3,447,586
FNMA   4.00 12-1-2049   3,444,150 3,793,526
FNMA   4.00 8-1-2059   10,703,059 11,963,914
FNMA   4.50 5-1-2034   1,128,430 1,247,201
FNMA   4.50 6-1-2041   217,574 245,480
FNMA   4.50 3-1-2043   2,816,905 3,182,211
FNMA   4.50 10-1-2045   4,430,734 5,005,700
FNMA   4.50 2-1-2046   94,461 105,284
FNMA   4.50 6-1-2048   1,617,996 1,815,172
FNMA   4.50 7-1-2048   5,340,327 5,994,350
FNMA   4.50 8-1-2048   7,663,177 8,471,444
FNMA   4.50 10-1-2048   7,031,874 7,741,590
FNMA   4.50 10-1-2048   10,428,216 11,512,391
FNMA   4.50 11-1-2048   2,417,976 2,712,628
FNMA   4.50 1-1-2049   12,582,016 13,948,539
FNMA   4.50 2-1-2049   7,141,602 7,915,566
FNMA   4.50 6-1-2049   5,424,239 5,995,208
FNMA   4.50 7-1-2049   5,512,539 6,109,996
FNMA   4.50 7-1-2049   9,053,612 10,004,902
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

30  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Agency securities (continued)            
FNMA   4.50% 8-1-2049 $   5,245,032 $    5,821,651
FNMA   4.50 3-1-2050     6,343,003     7,046,503
FNMA   4.50 4-1-2050     2,182,108     2,438,130
FNMA   4.50 4-1-2050     3,595,515     4,039,227
FNMA   4.50 1-1-2059    10,534,396    11,903,393
FNMA   5.00 7-1-2044       347,774       389,577
FNMA   5.00 10-1-2048        88,815        99,436
FNMA   5.00 12-1-2048     4,145,785     4,595,962
FNMA   5.00 6-1-2049    27,945,750    31,351,555
FNMA   5.00 8-1-2049    35,234,736    39,545,847
FNMA   5.00 8-1-2049    18,184,335    20,379,278
FNMA   5.00 11-1-2049     5,726,590     6,318,210
FNMA   5.50 12-1-2048     4,354,873     4,959,734
FNMA   5.50 6-1-2049    11,985,584    13,751,091
FNMA   6.00 4-1-2022           618           692
FNMA   6.00 2-1-2029         1,799         2,020
FNMA   6.00 3-1-2033        24,063        27,852
FNMA   6.00 11-1-2033         8,258         9,782
FNMA   2.50 12-1-2035    16,743,961    17,749,217
FNMA   2.50 9-1-2050    42,215,862    43,888,054
FNMA Series 2017-13 Class PA   3.00 8-25-2046     3,781,292     3,989,002
FNMA Series 2017-M7 Class A2 ±±   2.96 2-25-2027     2,040,000     2,228,632
FNMA Series 2018-14 Class KC   3.00 3-25-2048     3,902,080     4,180,749
FNMA Series 2018-15 Class AB   3.00 3-25-2048   1,463,724 1,567,478
FNMA Series 2018-8 Class KL   2.50 3-25-2047   4,307,407 4,517,005
FNMA Series 2020 48 Class AB   2.00 7-25-2050   6,648,030 6,828,871
FNMA Series 2020-48 Class DA   2.00 7-25-2050   16,836,917 17,186,436
FNMA Series 2021-27 Class EC   1.50 5-25-2051   17,115,446 17,313,874
FNMA Series 414 Class A35   3.50 10-25-2042   8,350,761 9,006,210
GNMA   2.00 6-21-2051   18,600,000 18,912,063
GNMA   2.50 3-20-2051   28,366,836 29,407,809
GNMA %%   2.50 6-20-2051   18,002,316 18,649,977
GNMA   2.50 6-21-2051   51,300,000 53,123,415
GNMA   3.50 1-20-2048   4,190,040 4,492,636
GNMA   3.50 3-20-2049   3,123,142 3,363,271
GNMA   4.00 6-20-2047   32,554,816 34,992,140
GNMA   4.00 3-20-2048   1,019,596 1,099,103
GNMA   4.00 4-20-2048   1,781,654 1,920,682
GNMA   4.00 4-20-2048   1,380,931 1,482,851
GNMA   4.00 4-20-2048   1,280,591 1,387,671
GNMA   4.00 5-20-2049   1,843,923 1,996,484
GNMA   4.00 6-20-2049   5,209,317 5,640,407
GNMA   4.00 7-20-2049   4,504,706 4,877,190
GNMA   4.50 8-15-2047   869,075 971,731
GNMA   4.50 6-20-2048   6,039,453 6,518,518
GNMA   4.50 2-20-2049   6,382,978 7,129,852
GNMA   4.50 3-20-2049   587,721 640,350
GNMA   4.50 4-20-2049   957,605 1,048,253
GNMA   4.50 5-20-2049   1,276,323 1,397,202
GNMA   4.50 5-20-2049   1,033,374 1,131,210
GNMA   5.00 12-20-2039   143,369 161,512
GNMA   5.00 11-20-2045   260,471 291,989
GNMA   5.00 3-20-2048   9,882,863 10,875,260
GNMA   5.00 5-20-2048   4,841,645 5,260,290
GNMA   5.00 6-20-2048   18,416,684 20,019,895
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio  |  31


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Agency securities (continued)            
GNMA   5.00% 7-20-2048 $   3,299,118 $     3,599,447
GNMA   5.00 8-20-2048     5,215,604     5,677,216
GNMA   5.00 12-20-2048     5,313,618     5,769,026
GNMA   5.00 1-20-2049     1,055,826     1,147,586
GNMA   5.00 1-20-2049     4,802,124     5,468,044
GNMA   5.00 2-20-2049       723,669       804,962
GNMA   5.00 3-20-2049     1,405,508     1,560,307
GNMA Series 2012-141 Class WA ±±   4.53 11-16-2041     1,137,496     1,273,879
GNMA Series 2017-167 Class BQ   2.50 8-20-2044     4,587,761     4,774,699
GNMA Series 2018-11 Class PC   2.75 12-20-2047     5,960,976     6,149,292
GNMA Series 2019-132 Class NA   3.50 9-20-2049     5,279,773     5,622,578
GNMA Series 2021-23 Class MG   1.50 2-20-2051    12,061,781    12,278,284
Total Agency securities (Cost $1,748,857,570)           1,772,000,438
Asset-backed securities: 8.10%            
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Series 2020-2 Class A2   0.60 12-18-2023     5,236,484     5,245,593
Avis Budget Rental Car Funding LLC Series 2017-1A Class A 144A   3.07 9-20-2023     1,620,000     1,668,959
Avis Budget Rental Car Funding LLC Series 2019-3A Class A1 144A   2.36 3-20-2026     3,825,000     4,020,850
Bank of America Credit Card Trust Series 2021-A1 Class A1   0.44 9-15-2026     5,946,000     5,946,797
College Avenue Student Loan Trust Series 2017-A Class A1 (1 Month LIBOR+1.65%) 144A±   1.76 11-26-2046     2,357,781     2,402,345
College Avenue Student Loan Trust Series 2018-A Class A2 144A   4.13 12-26-2047     1,832,141     1,938,412
College Avenue Student Loan Trust Series 2019- A Class A2 144A   3.28 12-28-2048     2,997,032     3,107,217
College Avenue Student Loan Trust Series 2021-A Class-A2 144A   1.60 7-25-2051     4,397,089     4,397,226
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust Series 2018-1 Class A 144A   3.19 7-15-2031     3,524,000     3,828,762
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust Series 2019-1 Class A 144A   3.52 7-15-2030   7,460,000 8,055,691
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust Series 2021-1 Class A 144A   1.37 10-17-2033   9,260,000 9,372,660
Navient Student Loan Trust Series 2014-AA Class A3 (1 Month LIBOR+1.60%) 144A±   1.70 10-15-2031   2,622,000 2,667,370
Navient Student Loan Trust Series 2016-AA Class A2B (1 Month LIBOR+2.15%) 144A±   2.25 12-15-2045   1,694,001 1,743,926
Navient Student Loan Trust Series 2018-CA Class A2 144A   3.52 6-16-2042   872,215 888,303
Navient Student Loan Trust Series 2018-DA Class A2A 144A   4.00 12-15-2059   4,894,996 5,152,195
Navient Student Loan Trust Series 2019 -D Class A2A 144A   3.01 12-15-2059   9,490,004 9,939,998
Navient Student Loan Trust Series 2019-A Class A2A 144A   3.42 1-15-2043   7,380,041 7,579,743
Navient Student Loan Trust Series 2019-BA Class A2A 144A   3.39 12-15-2059   7,705,386 8,132,577
Navient Student Loan Trust Series 2019-CA Class A2 144A   3.13 2-15-2068   5,921,219 6,063,411
Navient Student Loan Trust Series 2019-FA Class A2 144A   2.60 8-15-2068   7,376,605 7,532,773
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

32  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Asset-backed securities (continued)            
Navient Student Loan Trust Series 2019-GA Class A 144A   2.40% 10-15-2068 $   3,738,750 $    3,843,672
Navient Student Loan Trust Series 2020-A Class A2A 144A   2.46 11-15-2068     7,508,000     7,789,550
Navient Student Loan Trust Series 2020-BA ClassA2 144A   2.12 1-15-2069     4,271,000     4,337,372
Navient Student Loan Trust Series 2020-DA Class A 144A   1.69 5-15-2069     2,975,437     3,010,207
Navient Student Loan Trust Series 2020-EA Class A 144A   1.69 5-15-2069     1,172,598     1,194,483
Navient Student Loan Trust Series 2020-GA Class A 144A   1.17 9-16-2069     7,548,408     7,593,013
Navient Student Loan Trust Series 2020-HA Class A 144A   1.31 1-15-2069     4,022,297     4,056,995
Navient Student Loan Trust Series 2020-IA Class A1A 144A   1.33 4-15-2069    15,262,330    15,280,260
Navient Student Loan Trust Series 2021-A Class A 144A   0.84 5-15-2069     1,791,151     1,792,642
Navient Student Loan Trust Series 2021-BA Class A 144A   0.94 7-15-2069     7,996,053     8,015,905
Navient Student Loan Trust Series 2021-CA Class A 144A   1.06 10-15-2069    18,982,000    18,992,742
Nelnet Student Loan Trust Series 2004-4 Class A5 (3 Month LIBOR+0.16%) ±   0.34 1-25-2037     4,415,115     4,363,549
Nelnet Student Loan Trust Series 2004-5 Class A5 (3 Month LIBOR+0.18%) ±   0.36 10-27-2036     2,131,597     2,100,893
Nelnet Student Loan Trust Series 2005-1 Class A5 (3 Month LIBOR+0.11%) ±   0.29 10-25-2033    17,569,128    17,291,093
Nelnet Student Loan Trust Series 2005-2 Class A5 (3 Month LIBOR+0.10%) ±   0.29 3-23-2037    17,118,017    16,855,433
Nelnet Student Loan Trust Series 2005-3 Class A5 (3 Month LIBOR+0.12%) ±   0.31 12-24-2035    12,888,202    12,707,587
Nelnet Student Loan Trust Series 2005-4 Class A4 (3 Month LIBOR+0.18%) ±   0.37 3-22-2032     3,130,995     3,031,415
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust Series 2020-1 Class A3   2.03 2-15-2024     2,240,000     2,254,087
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust Series 2020-2 Class A2A   0.62 5-15-2023     2,183,249     2,184,130
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust Series 2020-3 Class A3   0.52 7-15-2024     3,198,000     3,204,209
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust Series 2020-4 Class A3   0.48 7-15-2024     2,889,000     2,895,920
Santander Revolving Auto Loan Trust Series 2019-A Class A 144A   2.51 1-26-2032     5,589,000     5,907,815
SLM Student Loan Trust Series 2003-1 Class A5C (3 Month LIBOR+0.75%) 144A±   0.93 12-15-2032     3,020,351     2,933,985
SLM Student Loan Trust Series 2003-10A Class A4 (3 Month LIBOR+0.67%) 144A±   0.85 12-17-2068   8,967,000 8,966,994
SLM Student Loan Trust Series 2007-2 Class A4 (3 Month LIBOR+0.06%) ±   0.24 7-25-2022   15,659,682 15,205,636
SLM Student Loan Trust Series 2007-3 Class A4 (3 Month LIBOR+0.06%) ±   0.24 1-25-2022   4,055,582 3,931,340
SLM Student Loan Trust Series 2010-1 Class A (1 Month LIBOR+0.40%) ±   0.51 3-25-2025   1,407,344 1,383,730
SLM Student Loan Trust Series 2012-1 Class A3 (1 Month LIBOR+0.95%) ±   1.06 9-25-2028   10,478,847 10,346,689
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio  |  33


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Asset-backed securities (continued)            
SLM Student Loan Trust Series 2012-2 Class A (1 Month LIBOR+0.70%) ±   0.81% 1-25-2029 $   8,762,899 $    8,586,281
SLM Student Loan Trust Series 2012-6 Class A3 (1 Month LIBOR+0.75%) ±   0.86 5-26-2026     2,314,495     2,290,919
SMB Private Education Loan Trust Series 2015-B Class A2A 144A   2.98 7-15-2027       208,429       211,089
SMB Private Education Loan Trust Series 2016-A Class A2A 144A   2.70 5-15-2031     5,132,905     5,275,277
SMB Private Education Loan Trust Series 2016-B Class A2A 144A   2.43 2-17-2032     2,509,778     2,576,969
SMB Private Education Loan Trust Series 2016-B Class A2B (1 Month LIBOR+1.45%) 144A±   1.56 2-17-2032     2,458,855     2,494,031
SMB Private Education Loan Trust Series 2016-C Class A2B (1 Month LIBOR+1.10%) 144A±   1.21 9-15-2034     2,690,394     2,714,265
SMB Private Education Loan Trust Series 2018-C Class A2A 144A   3.63 11-15-2035     3,146,468     3,323,942
SMB Private Education Loan Trust Series 2019-A Class A2A 144A   3.44 7-15-2036    11,717,682    12,341,198
SMB Private Education Loan Trust Series 2020-BA Class A1A 144A   1.29 7-15-2053     9,647,679     9,707,923
SMB Private Education Loan Trust Series 2020-PTA Class A2A 144A   1.60 9-15-2054    10,058,000    10,194,336
SMB Private Education Loan Trust Series 2020-PTB Class A2A 144A   1.60 9-15-2054    26,019,000    26,376,043
SMB Private Education Loan Trust Series 2021-A Class APT1 144A   1.07 1-15-2053    22,251,420    22,025,611
SMB Private Education Loan Trust Series 2021-B Class A 144A   1.31 7-17-2051     9,374,000     9,381,378
SMB Private Education Loan Trust Series 2021-C Class A1 (1 Month LIBOR+0.40%) 144A±   0.49 1-15-2053     4,537,000     4,537,000
SMB Private Education Loan Trust Series 2053 Class 1 (1 Month LIBOR+0.80%) 144A±   0.89 1-15-2053     6,986,000     6,986,000
SoFi Professional Loan Program LLC Series 2016-A Class A2 144A   2.76 12-26-2036     1,092,063     1,106,172
SoFi Professional Loan Program LLC Series 2016-E Class A1 (1 Month LIBOR+0.85%) 144A±   0.94 7-25-2039       289,589       290,123
SoFi Professional Loan Program LLC Series 2017-A Class A1 (1 Month LIBOR+0.70%) 144A±   0.81 3-26-2040       325,471       325,670
SoFi Professional Loan Program LLC Series 2017-D Class A2 144A   2.65 9-25-2040       283,964       290,419
SoFi Professional Loan Program LLC Series 2017-E Class A1 (1 Month LIBOR+0.50%) 144A±   0.61 11-26-2040       186,300       186,426
SoFi Professional Loan Program LLC Series 2017-E Class A2B 144A   2.72 11-26-2040     1,258,872     1,282,327
SoFi Professional Loan Program LLC Series 2018-A Class A2B 144A   2.95 2-25-2042     2,015,702     2,056,186
SoFi Professional Loan Program LLC Series 2018-B Class A2FX 144A   3.34 8-25-2047   4,586,613 4,706,809
SoFi Professional Loan Program LLC Series 2020-A Class A2 144A   2.54 5-15-2046   8,057,000 8,346,623
SoFi Professional Loan Program LLC Series 2020-C Class AFX 144A   1.95 2-15-2046   3,579,223 3,644,739
Tesla Auto Lease Trust Series 2021-A Class A3 144A   0.56 3-20-2025   2,130,000 2,137,679
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

34  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Asset-backed securities (continued)            
Toyota Auto Loan Extneded Note Series 2021-1A Class A 144A   1.07% 2-27-2034 $   9,822,000 $     9,852,339
Triton Container Finance LLC Series 2020-1A Class A 144A   2.11 9-20-2045     2,372,483     2,396,490
Total Asset-backed securities (Cost $451,585,022)             456,800,418
Corporate bonds and notes: 24.45%            
Communication services: 2.58%            
Diversified telecommunication services: 1.78%            
AT&T Incorporated   2.25 2-1-2032     4,126,000     3,968,802
AT&T Incorporated   3.10 2-1-2043       900,000       851,989
AT&T Incorporated   3.50 6-1-2041     1,900,000     1,905,972
AT&T Incorporated 144A   3.50 9-15-2053     6,852,000     6,501,331
AT&T Incorporated 144A   3.55 9-15-2055     1,862,000     1,760,635
AT&T Incorporated 144A   3.80 12-1-2057     3,408,000     3,356,025
AT&T Incorporated   3.85 6-1-2060     2,751,000     2,751,751
T-Mobile USA Incorporated   2.05 2-15-2028     5,448,000     5,423,157
T-Mobile USA Incorporated   2.25 2-15-2026     4,117,000     4,151,789
T-Mobile USA Incorporated 144A   2.25 2-15-2026    20,995,000    21,172,408
T-Mobile USA Incorporated   2.88 2-15-2031     3,127,000     3,015,491
T-Mobile USA Incorporated 144A   3.38 4-15-2029    11,875,000    12,084,119
T-Mobile USA Incorporated 144A   3.50 4-15-2031     7,882,000     8,015,600
T-Mobile USA Incorporated   3.75 4-15-2027       518,000       569,443
Verizon Communications Incorporated   2.55 3-21-2031     2,236,000     2,248,504
Verizon Communications Incorporated   2.65 11-20-2040     7,471,000     6,883,509
Verizon Communications Incorporated   2.88 11-20-2050     3,208,000     2,891,568
Verizon Communications Incorporated   3.40 3-22-2041   3,590,000 3,650,792
Verizon Communications Incorporated   3.55 3-22-2051   5,064,000 5,135,374
Verizon Communications Incorporated   3.70 3-22-2061   2,612,000 2,635,889
Verizon Communications Incorporated   4.33 9-21-2028   1,236,000 1,420,604
            100,394,752
Entertainment: 0.14%            
Electronic Arts Incorporated   1.85 2-15-2031   134,000 127,624
NETFLIX Incorporated 144A   3.63 6-15-2025   3,172,000 3,398,005
NETFLIX Incorporated   5.88 11-15-2028   3,409,000 4,124,890
            7,650,519
Media: 0.66%            
Charter Communications Operating LLC   3.50 6-1-2041   3,694,000 3,524,130
Charter Communications Operating LLC   3.90 6-1-2052   6,903,000 6,617,656
Charter Communications Operating LLC %%   4.40 12-1-2061   2,604,000 2,633,395
Charter Communications Operating LLC   4.46 7-23-2022   1,700,000 1,766,687
Charter Communications Operating LLC   4.80 3-1-2050   3,463,000 3,800,719
Comcast Corporation   1.50 2-15-2031   6,389,000 5,936,352
Comcast Corporation   3.75 4-1-2040   3,594,000 3,944,132
Comcast Corporation   3.95 10-15-2025   1,263,000 1,417,870
Comcast Corporation   4.15 10-15-2028   2,163,000 2,493,389
Comcast Corporation   4.60 10-15-2038   1,616,000 1,945,849
Discovery Communications LLC 144A   4.00 9-15-2055   2,199,000 2,176,851
Discovery Communications LLC   4.65 5-15-2050   552,000 613,052
ViacomCBS Incorporated   4.60 1-15-2045   345,000 387,864
            37,257,946
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio  |  35


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Consumer discretionary: 1.81%            
Automobiles: 0.07%            
Ford Motor Company   4.75% 1-15-2043 $     965,000 $       973,492
Nissan Motor Company 144A   2.75 3-9-2028     2,790,000     2,795,761
                3,769,253
Diversified consumer services: 0.27%            
Sodexo Incorporated 144A   1.63 4-16-2026     4,830,000     4,854,441
Sodexo Incorporated 144A   2.72 4-16-2031     4,585,000     4,582,981
Yale University   0.87 4-15-2025     3,182,000     3,210,189
Yale University   1.48 4-15-2030     2,727,000     2,641,069
               15,288,680
Hotels, restaurants & leisure: 0.45%            
GLP Capital LP   4.00 1-15-2030     1,472,000     1,562,219
GLP Capital LP   5.30 1-15-2029     1,800,000     2,077,362
Marriott International Incorporated   2.85 4-15-2031     7,998,000     7,975,115
Marriott International Incorporated   4.63 6-15-2030       700,000       789,485
Marriott International Incorporated   5.75 5-1-2025     3,290,000     3,816,598
Starbucks Corporation   1.30 5-7-2022     2,263,000     2,286,051
Starbucks Corporation   3.35 3-12-2050     2,777,000     2,754,938
Starbucks Corporation   3.50 11-15-2050     3,926,000     3,985,831
               25,247,599
Internet & direct marketing retail: 0.68%            
Amazon.com Incorporated   1.00 5-12-2026    14,682,000    14,674,881
Amazon.com Incorporated   1.65 5-12-2028     5,450,000     5,476,260
Amazon.com Incorporated   2.10 5-12-2031   13,815,000 13,855,853
Amazon.com Incorporated   2.70 6-3-2060   827,000 736,304
Amazon.com Incorporated   3.10 5-12-2051   1,845,000 1,841,189
Amazon.com Incorporated   3.25 5-12-2061   1,845,000 1,850,129
            38,434,616
Specialty retail: 0.34%            
Home Depot Incorporated   2.38 3-15-2051   2,272,000 1,998,331
Home Depot Incorporated   2.70 4-15-2030   2,209,000 2,327,723
Home Depot Incorporated   3.13 12-15-2049   6,918,000 6,981,208
Home Depot Incorporated   3.30 4-15-2040   736,000 774,363
Home Depot Incorporated   3.35 4-15-2050   1,781,000 1,872,207
Lowe's Companies Incorporated   2.63 4-1-2031   4,472,000 4,545,123
Lowe's Companies Incorporated   3.50 4-1-2051   982,000 1,007,132
            19,506,087
Consumer staples: 1.14%            
Beverages: 0.51%            
Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide Incorporated   3.75 7-15-2042   1,627,000 1,706,268
Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide Incorporated   4.38 4-15-2038   5,290,000 6,047,213
Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide Incorporated   4.60 4-15-2048   3,881,000 4,495,121
Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide Incorporated   4.70 2-1-2036   5,036,000 6,000,009
Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide Incorporated   4.90 2-1-2046   4,518,000 5,416,400
Molson Coors Beverage Company   4.20 7-15-2046   4,953,000 5,248,740
            28,913,751
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

36  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Food & staples retailing: 0.04%            
Walgreens Boots Alliance   4.10% 4-15-2050 $     364,000 $       381,481
Walmart Incorporated   3.05 7-8-2026     1,672,000     1,835,694
Walmart Incorporated   4.05 6-29-2048        45,000        54,426
                2,271,601
Food products: 0.05%            
Hormel Foods Corporation %%   1.70 6-3-2028     2,719,000     2,711,345
Personal products: 0.09%            
Estee Lauder Incorporated   1.95 3-15-2031     5,353,000     5,254,412
Tobacco: 0.45%            
Altria Group Incorporated   2.35 5-6-2025       782,000       818,952
Altria Group Incorporated   2.45 2-4-2032     2,099,000     1,987,284
Altria Group Incorporated   3.40 2-4-2041     5,753,000     5,279,842
Altria Group Incorporated   3.88 9-16-2046     3,690,000     3,513,861
Altria Group Incorporated   4.00 2-4-2061     2,372,000     2,212,295
BAT Capital Corporation   2.26 3-25-2028       954,000       938,676
BAT Capital Corporation   2.73 3-25-2031     5,838,000     5,620,555
BAT Capital Corporation   3.56 8-15-2027     3,554,000     3,775,437
BAT Capital Corporation   4.91 4-2-2030       984,000     1,114,269
               25,261,171
Energy: 1.83%            
Energy equipment & services: 0.15%            
Duke Energy Carolinas LLC   2.55 4-15-2031     1,800,000     1,848,448
NSTAR Electric Company   3.10 6-1-2051     1,627,000     1,613,638
Tampa Electric Company   2.40 3-15-2031   2,681,000 2,708,076
Tampa Electric Company   3.45 3-15-2051   2,145,000 2,246,520
            8,416,682
Oil, gas & consumable fuels: 1.68%            
BP Capital Markets America Incorporated   3.38 2-8-2061   1,509,000 1,460,878
Devon Energy Corporation   4.75 5-15-2042   1,900,000 2,089,037
Devon Energy Corporation   5.00 6-15-2045   945,000 1,071,298
Devon Energy Corporation   5.60 7-15-2041   1,436,000 1,731,054
Devon Energy Corporation   5.85 12-15-2025   8,145,000 9,633,966
Diamondback Energy Incorporated   3.25 12-1-2026   5,508,000 5,928,482
Diamondback Energy Incorporated   3.50 12-1-2029   3,272,000 3,468,006
Diamondback Energy Incorporated   4.40 3-24-2051   3,949,000 4,256,623
Enable Midstream Partners   3.90 5-15-2024   491,000 525,375
Enable Midstream Partners   4.15 9-15-2029   2,090,000 2,250,649
Enable Midstream Partners   4.40 3-15-2027   3,526,000 3,892,003
Enable Midstream Partners   4.95 5-15-2028   5,980,000 6,768,822
Energy Transfer Operating Partners LP   4.05 3-15-2025   8,562,000 9,297,463
Energy Transfer Operating Partners LP   5.15 3-15-2045   905,000 993,074
Energy Transfer Operating Partners LP   5.25 4-15-2029   58,000 67,565
Energy Transfer Operating Partners LP   5.30 4-15-2047   552,000 615,427
Energy Transfer Operating Partners LP   6.00 6-15-2048   727,000 879,751
Energy Transfer Operating Partners LP   6.05 6-1-2041   827,000 999,260
Energy Transfer Operating Partners LP   6.10 2-15-2042   931,000 1,108,301
Energy Transfer Operating Partners LP   6.13 12-15-2045   1,597,000 1,924,106
Energy Transfer Partners LP   7.50 7-1-2038   425,000 579,232
Enterprise Products Operating LLC   3.95 1-31-2060   773,000 793,232
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio  |  37


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Oil, gas & consumable fuels (continued)            
Marathon Oil Corporation   5.20% 6-1-2045 $   4,136,000 $     4,759,151
ONEOK Incorporated   3.10 3-15-2030     3,036,000     3,118,666
ONEOK Incorporated   3.40 9-1-2029     1,191,000     1,253,274
ONEOK Incorporated   4.00 7-13-2027       754,000       832,244
ONEOK Incorporated   4.35 3-15-2029     1,282,000     1,431,132
ONEOK Incorporated   4.45 9-1-2049     2,963,000     3,141,684
ONEOK Incorporated   4.95 7-13-2047       354,000       397,061
ONEOK Incorporated   5.85 1-15-2026       454,000       538,263
Pioneer Natural Resource   1.90 8-15-2030     4,772,000     4,491,963
Plains All American Pipeline LP   4.90 2-15-2045       773,000       799,165
Sunoco Logistics Partner LP   5.35 5-15-2045     1,364,000     1,529,268
WPX Energy Incorporated   5.25 9-15-2024    10,806,000    11,986,664
               94,612,139
Financials: 7.00%            
Banks: 3.72%            
Bank of America Corporation (U.S. SOFR+0.69%) ±   0.98 4-22-2025     9,663,000     9,721,078
Bank of America Corporation (U.S. SOFR+1.01%) ±   1.20 10-24-2026    13,590,000    13,549,250
Bank of America Corporation (U.S. SOFR+1.15%) ±   1.32 6-19-2026     8,036,000     8,094,525
Bank of America Corporation (U.S. SOFR+0.91%) ±   1.66 3-11-2027    17,962,000    18,215,994
Bank of America Corporation (U.S. SOFR+0.96%) ±   1.73 7-22-2027     9,689,000     9,810,673
Bank of America Corporation (U.S. SOFR+1.53%) ±   1.90 7-23-2031     5,480,000     5,236,574
Bank of America Corporation (U.S. SOFR+1.37%) ±   1.92 10-24-2031     2,981,000     2,847,886
Bank of America Corporation (3 Month LIBOR+0.64%) ±   2.02 2-13-2026       909,000       943,405
Bank of America Corporation (3 Month LIBOR+0.87%) ±   2.46 10-22-2025   4,935,000 5,196,812
Bank of America Corporation (3 Month LIBOR+0.99%) ±   2.50 2-13-2031   5,008,000 5,039,234
Bank of America Corporation (U.S. SOFR+2.15%) ±   2.59 4-29-2031   5,753,000 5,856,251
Bank of America Corporation (U.S. SOFR+1.32%) ±   2.69 4-22-2032   17,567,000 17,811,692
Bank of America Corporation (3 Month LIBOR+0.79%) ±   3.00 12-20-2023   9,463,000 9,846,323
Bank of America Corporation (U.S. SOFR+1.58%) ±   3.31 4-22-2042   3,863,000 3,953,880
Bank of America Corporation   3.50 4-19-2026   909,000 1,008,172
Bank of America Corporation (3 Month LIBOR+1.06%) ±   3.56 4-23-2027   4,399,000 4,836,712
Deutsche Bank (U.S. SOFR+1.87%) ±   2.13 11-24-2026   9,402,000 9,561,588
Deutsche Bank (U.S. SOFR+2.76%) ±   3.73 1-14-2032   2,396,000 2,400,063
Deutsche Bank   0.90 5-28-2024   4,526,000 4,529,409
Deutsche Bank (U.S. SOFR+1.72%) ±   3.04 5-28-2032   2,770,000 2,756,338
JPMorgan Chase & Company (U.S. SOFR+0.54%) ±%%   0.82 6-1-2025   8,141,000 8,151,880
JPMorgan Chase & Company (U.S. SOFR+0.70%) ±   1.04 2-4-2027   17,835,000 17,617,328
JPMorgan Chase & Company (U.S. SOFR+0.80%) ±   1.05 11-19-2026   9,945,000 9,856,630
JPMorgan Chase & Company (U.S. SOFR+0.89%) ±   1.58 4-22-2027   5,371,000 5,411,773
JPMorgan Chase & Company (U.S. SOFR+1.02%) ±%%   2.07 6-1-2029   8,862,000 8,874,844
JPMorgan Chase & Company (U.S. SOFR+1.85%) ±   2.08 4-22-2026   7,798,000 8,101,059
JPMorgan Chase & Company (U.S. SOFR+1.89%) ±   2.18 6-1-2028   5,462,000 5,600,807
JPMorgan Chase & Company (U.S. SOFR+1.58%) ±   3.33 4-22-2052   2,681,000 2,713,787
JPMorgan Chase & Company (3 Month LIBOR+1.36%) ±   3.88 7-24-2038   2,015,000 2,264,985
            209,808,952
Capital markets: 1.71%            
Athene Global Funding 144A   2.50 3-24-2028   7,171,000 7,302,142
FS KKR Capital Corporation   3.40 1-15-2026   10,775,000 11,127,296
GE Capital Funding LLC   3.45 5-15-2025   2,250,000 2,454,042
GE Capital Funding LLC   4.40 5-15-2030   3,188,000 3,665,347
Golub Capital LLC   2.50 8-24-2026   1,781,000 1,784,698
Golub Capital LLC   3.38 4-15-2024   7,889,000 8,223,050
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

38  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Capital markets (continued)            
Morgan Stanley (U.S. SOFR+0.53%) ±%%   0.79% 5-30-2025 $  18,124,000 $    18,110,176
Morgan Stanley (U.S. SOFR+0.75%) ±   0.86 10-21-2025     6,427,000     6,446,393
Morgan Stanley (U.S. SOFR+0.72%) ±   0.99 12-10-2026     9,072,000     8,962,410
Morgan Stanley (U.S. SOFR+1.99%) ±   2.19 4-28-2026       909,000       950,607
Oaktree Specialty lend   2.70 1-15-2027     3,674,000     3,692,611
Owl Rock Capital Corporation   3.40 7-15-2026    10,381,000    10,849,825
PPL Capital Funding Incorporated   3.10 5-15-2026     5,008,000     5,394,900
PPL Capital Funding Incorporated   3.40 6-1-2023       509,000       533,907
PPL Capital Funding Incorporated   4.13 4-15-2030     4,626,000     5,224,355
PPL Capital Funding Incorporated   5.00 3-15-2044     1,454,000     1,803,063
               96,524,822
Consumer finance: 1.13%            
Bunge Limited Finance Corporation   1.63 8-17-2025     3,101,000     3,137,777
Bunge Limited Finance Corporation   2.75 5-14-2031    11,063,000    11,049,614
Bunge Limited Finance Corporation   3.25 8-15-2026     4,808,000     5,202,233
Bunge Limited Finance Corporation   3.75 9-25-2027     9,007,000     9,935,695
Ford Motor Credit Company LLC   4.00 11-13-2030     2,630,000     2,689,175
General Motors Financial Company Incorporated   5.40 4-1-2048     1,528,000     1,867,197
Hyundai Capital America Company 144A   0.80 1-8-2024     5,635,000     5,623,625
Hyundai Capital America Company 144A   1.25 9-18-2023     2,772,000     2,799,278
Hyundai Capital America Company 144A   1.30 1-8-2026     5,535,000     5,482,905
Hyundai Capital America Company 144A   1.80 10-15-2025     4,653,000     4,710,243
Hyundai Capital America Company 144A   2.38 10-15-2027     1,854,000     1,887,663
John Deere Capital Corporation   0.55 7-5-2022   5,454,000 5,476,634
John Deere Capital Corporation   1.20 4-6-2023   4,200,000 4,276,642
            64,138,681
Diversified financial services: 0.09%            
Andrew W. Mellon Foundation   0.95 8-1-2027   2,173,000 2,124,831
Assured Guaranty US Holdings Incorporated   3.15 6-15-2031   2,749,000 2,785,193
            4,910,024
Insurance: 0.35%            
American International Group Incorporated   3.40 6-30-2030   4,008,000 4,328,477
American International Group Incorporated   4.38 6-30-2050   2,372,000 2,742,968
Brighthouse Financial Incorporated   4.70 6-22-2047   3,263,000 3,520,608
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company 144A   4.35 4-30-2050   2,185,000 2,352,957
SBL Holdings Incorporated 144A   5.00 2-18-2031   6,171,000 6,654,071
            19,599,081
Health care: 1.97%            
Biotechnology: 0.70%            
AbbVie Incorporated   2.30 11-21-2022   5,553,000 5,713,650
AbbVie Incorporated   3.20 11-21-2029   3,299,000 3,538,509
AbbVie Incorporated   3.75 11-14-2023   491,000 529,004
AbbVie Incorporated   4.05 11-21-2039   2,063,000 2,308,063
AbbVie Incorporated   4.25 11-21-2049   5,408,000 6,228,308
AbbVie Incorporated   4.30 5-14-2036   1,291,000 1,491,629
AbbVie Incorporated   4.40 11-6-2042   445,000 516,008
AbbVie Incorporated   4.45 5-14-2046   1,309,000 1,529,296
Gilead Sciences Incorporated   1.20 10-1-2027   891,000 873,324
Gilead Sciences Incorporated   2.60 10-1-2040   3,081,000 2,879,626
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio  |  39


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Biotechnology (continued)            
Gilead Sciences Incorporated   2.80% 10-1-2050 $   3,953,000 $     3,575,726
Gilead Sciences Incorporated   4.00 9-1-2036     1,591,000     1,801,675
Regeneron Pharmaceutical Incorporated   1.75 9-15-2030     6,658,000     6,236,874
Regeneron Pharmaceutical Incorporated   2.80 9-15-2050     2,199,000     1,919,556
               39,141,248
Health care equipment & supplies: 0.08%            
Danaher Corporation   2.60 10-1-2050     2,608,000     2,379,144
Danaher Corporation   3.35 9-15-2025     1,781,000     1,959,561
                4,338,705
Health care providers & services: 0.60%            
Aetna Incorporated   3.88 8-15-2047     1,409,000     1,503,290
CVS Health Corporation   2.70 8-21-2040     2,808,000     2,619,555
CVS Health Corporation   3.00 8-15-2026     1,918,000     2,081,689
CVS Health Corporation   3.70 3-9-2023       645,000       681,877
CVS Health Corporation   4.30 3-25-2028     5,336,000     6,114,400
CVS Health Corporation   4.78 3-25-2038     2,799,000     3,332,831
CVS Health Corporation   5.05 3-25-2048     2,836,000     3,500,404
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated   2.30 5-15-2031     5,575,000     5,600,482
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated   2.75 5-15-2040     1,363,000     1,334,572
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated   2.90 5-15-2050     1,345,000     1,303,756
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated   3.05 5-15-2041       928,000       941,945
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated   3.25 5-15-2051     3,155,000     3,221,701
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated   3.75 10-15-2047       627,000       687,649
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated   3.88 8-15-2059   984,000 1,112,970
            34,037,121
Life sciences tools & services: 0.13%            
Thermo Fisher Scientific Incorporated   4.50 3-25-2030   6,089,000 7,167,652
Pharmaceuticals: 0.46%            
Astrazeneca Finance LLC   1.20 5-28-2026   5,437,000 5,442,821
Astrazeneca Finance LLC   1.75 5-28-2028   2,719,000 2,716,391
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company   2.55 11-13-2050   5,517,000 5,016,676
Pfizer Incorporated   2.55 5-28-2040   6,189,000 5,998,651
Pfizer Incorporated   2.70 5-28-2050   1,263,000 1,193,050
Pfizer Incorporated   2.80 3-11-2022   1,709,000 1,743,428
Royalty Pharma plc 144A   3.55 9-2-2050   4,172,000 4,000,376
            26,111,393
Industrials: 1.63%            
Aerospace & defense: 0.60%            
Northrop Grumman Corporation   2.93 1-15-2025   258,000 275,990
Northrop Grumman Corporation   3.25 8-1-2023   5,199,000 5,517,651
Northrop Grumman Corporation   3.25 1-15-2028   3,208,000 3,472,526
Northrop Grumman Corporation   4.03 10-15-2047   1,845,000 2,099,642
Northrop Grumman Corporation   5.15 5-1-2040   1,881,000 2,408,307
The Boeing Company   2.20 2-4-2026   6,744,000 6,772,835
The Boeing Company   3.25 2-1-2028   3,817,000 4,016,945
The Boeing Company   3.25 2-1-2035   2,181,000 2,156,189
The Boeing Company   3.63 2-1-2031   3,835,000 4,065,991
The Boeing Company   3.75 2-1-2050   1,134,000 1,110,802
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

40  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Aerospace & defense (continued)            
The Boeing Company   5.71% 5-1-2040 $   1,093,000 $     1,360,647
The Boeing Company   5.81 5-1-2050       288,000       370,409
               33,627,934
Airlines: 0.53%            
Delta Air Lines Incorporated 144A   4.50 10-20-2025     7,226,000     7,802,278
Delta Air Lines Incorporated 144A   4.75 10-20-2028    10,490,000    11,450,566
Southwest Airlines Company   4.75 5-4-2023     3,817,000     4,115,600
Southwest Airlines Company   5.13 6-15-2027     5,708,000     6,677,970
               30,046,414
Industrial conglomerates: 0.13%            
General Electric Company   3.45 5-1-2027     3,526,000     3,883,050
General Electric Company   4.25 5-1-2040       291,000       328,913
General Electric Company   4.35 5-1-2050     2,318,000     2,641,383
General Electric Company   5.88 1-14-2038       300,000       397,070
                7,250,416
Road & rail: 0.32%            
Burlington Northern Santa Fe LLC   3.05 2-15-2051     1,781,000     1,780,636
Burlington Northern Santa Fe LLC   3.30 9-15-2051     3,399,000     3,529,916
Burlington Northern Santa Fe LLC   3.55 2-15-2050       900,000       971,314
Union Pacific Corporation   2.15 2-5-2027     2,818,000     2,915,131
Union Pacific Corporation   2.40 2-5-2030     3,491,000     3,557,603
Union Pacific Corporation   2.95 3-1-2022     3,163,000     3,229,755
Union Pacific Corporation   3.15 3-1-2024     1,509,000     1,619,622
Union Pacific Corporation   3.75 2-5-2070   564,000 585,092
            18,189,069
Transportation infrastructure: 0.05%            
Crowley Conro LLC   4.18 8-15-2043   2,609,054 3,043,211
Information technology: 1.92%            
Electronic equipment, instruments & components: 0.04%            
Flex Limited   4.88 5-12-2030   2,172,000 2,496,154
IT services: 0.19%            
Paypal Holdings Incorporated   1.65 6-1-2025   6,889,000 7,120,617
VERISIGN Incorporated %%   2.70 6-15-2031   3,619,000 3,623,705
            10,744,322
Semiconductors & semiconductor equipment: 0.54%            
Broadcom Incorporated 144A   2.45 2-15-2031   3,108,000 2,984,781
Broadcom Incorporated   3.15 11-15-2025   2,327,000 2,500,548
Broadcom Incorporated 144A   3.42 4-15-2033   12,135,000 12,375,406
Broadcom Incorporated 144A   3.47 4-15-2034   4,590,000 4,648,361
Broadcom Incorporated   3.88 1-15-2027   1,345,000 1,477,648
Broadcom Incorporated   4.15 11-15-2030   3,163,000 3,462,908
Intel Corporation   3.10 2-15-2060   777,000 740,810
KLA Corporation   3.30 3-1-2050   2,418,000 2,393,041
            30,583,503
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio  |  41


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Software: 0.66%            
Microsoft Corporation   2.68% 6-1-2060 $     436,000 $       405,500
Microsoft Corporation   2.92 3-17-2052     1,800,000     1,801,596
Oracle Corporation   1.65 3-25-2026     5,471,000     5,542,917
Oracle Corporation   2.30 3-25-2028     1,942,000     1,983,277
Oracle Corporation   2.63 2-15-2023     2,354,000     2,444,128
Oracle Corporation   2.80 4-1-2027     5,435,000     5,775,881
Oracle Corporation   2.88 3-25-2031     5,786,000     5,927,327
Oracle Corporation   2.95 11-15-2024     1,263,000     1,350,282
Oracle Corporation   3.65 3-25-2041     3,654,000     3,724,970
Oracle Corporation   3.95 3-25-2051     2,554,000     2,652,341
Oracle Corporation   4.10 3-25-2061       727,000       761,340
VMware Incorporated   3.90 8-21-2027       709,000       787,510
VMware Incorporated   4.70 5-15-2030     3,572,000     4,147,973
               37,305,042
Technology hardware, storage & peripherals: 0.49%            
Apple Incorporated   2.38 2-8-2041     1,781,000     1,658,084
Apple Incorporated   2.55 8-20-2060     4,172,000     3,649,985
Apple Incorporated   2.65 5-11-2050     4,390,000     4,052,232
Apple Incorporated   2.65 2-8-2051     4,453,000     4,159,434
Apple Incorporated   2.80 2-8-2061     1,781,000     1,633,112
Dell International LLC 144A   4.90 10-1-2026       909,000     1,043,572
Dell International LLC 144A   6.10 7-15-2027     1,809,000     2,219,839
Dell International LLC 144A   8.35 7-15-2046     1,909,000     2,996,210
HP Incorporated   2.20 6-17-2025   5,726,000 5,987,206
            27,399,674
Materials: 0.59%            
Chemicals: 0.40%            
Dow Chemical Corporation   3.60 11-15-2050   1,072,000 1,089,796
Dow Chemical Corporation   4.38 11-15-2042   918,000 1,060,967
LYB International Finance III Company   3.38 10-1-2040   5,326,000 5,344,350
LYB International Finance III Company   3.63 4-1-2051   4,308,000 4,313,670
LYB International Finance III Company   3.80 10-1-2060   882,000 877,123
NewMarket Corporation   2.70 3-18-2031   4,485,000 4,461,441
Westlake Chemical Corporation   3.60 8-15-2026   1,945,000 2,137,800
Westlake Chemical Corporation   4.38 11-15-2047   2,745,000 3,073,007
Westlake Chemical Corporation   5.00 8-15-2046   45,000 54,426
            22,412,580
Metals & mining: 0.19%            
Newmont Mining Corporation   2.25 10-1-2030   11,217,000 11,065,271
Real estate: 1.60%            
Equity REITs: 1.43%            
Agree LP   2.00 6-15-2028   2,655,000 2,628,032
Agree LP   2.90 10-1-2030   1,327,000 1,367,451
American Tower Corporation   1.60 4-15-2026   3,590,000 3,628,493
American Tower Corporation   2.70 4-15-2031   2,690,000 2,719,396
Brixmor Operating Partnership   2.25 4-1-2028   1,245,000 1,236,432
Crown Castle International Corporation   1.05 7-15-2026   5,335,000 5,225,880
Crown Castle International Corporation   2.10 4-1-2031   9,863,000 9,409,866
Crown Castle International Corporation   2.90 4-1-2041   2,490,000 2,301,692
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

42  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Equity REITs (continued)            
Crown Castle International Corporation   4.00% 3-1-2027 $     891,000 $       996,223
Federal Realty Investment Trust   3.95 1-15-2024     2,463,000     2,661,706
Mid-America Apartments LP   3.60 6-1-2027       273,000       302,374
Mid-America Apartments LP   3.75 6-15-2024     4,181,000     4,524,299
Mid-America Apartments LP   3.95 3-15-2029     1,790,000     2,002,741
Mid-America Apartments LP   4.00 11-15-2025     2,181,000     2,423,295
Mid-America Apartments LP   4.30 10-15-2023     1,827,000     1,968,609
Regency Centers LP   2.95 9-15-2029     3,872,000     3,998,767
Spirit Realty LP   2.10 3-15-2028     3,545,000     3,500,387
Spirit Realty LP   2.70 2-15-2032     1,941,000     1,884,757
Spirit Realty LP   3.20 2-15-2031     4,217,000     4,293,107
Spirit Realty LP   3.40 1-15-2030     2,145,000     2,252,692
Spirit Realty LP   4.00 7-15-2029     1,027,000     1,124,329
Spirit Realty LP   4.45 9-15-2026       227,000       253,414
Store Capital Corporation   2.75 11-18-2030     3,154,000     3,124,927
Store Capital Corporation   4.50 3-15-2028     6,726,000     7,509,243
Store Capital Corporation   4.63 3-15-2029     2,272,000     2,563,621
VEREIT Operating Partnership LP   2.20 6-15-2028     1,909,000     1,917,819
VEREIT Operating Partnership LP   2.85 12-15-2032     2,581,000     2,629,206
VEREIT Operating Partnership LP   3.40 1-15-2028     1,890,000     2,041,511
               80,490,269
Real estate management & development: 0.17%            
Essex Portfolio LP   1.70 3-1-2028     4,663,000     4,529,995
Essex Portfolio LP %%   2.55 6-15-2031   1,830,000 1,822,036
Highwoods Realty LP   2.63 10-1-2023   81,000 83,732
Vornado Realty LP   2.15 6-1-2026   2,203,000 2,222,027
Vornado Realty LP   3.40 6-1-2031   1,100,000 1,108,556
            9,766,346
Utilities: 2.38%            
Electric utilities: 1.51%            
Duke Energy Corporation   1.80 9-1-2021   3,754,000 3,762,820
Duke Energy Progress LLC   2.50 8-15-2050   2,672,000 2,343,259
Entergy Arkansas LLC   2.65 6-15-2051   2,382,000 2,155,041
Entergy Corporation   1.90 6-15-2028   3,563,000 3,523,407
Entergy Corporation   2.40 6-15-2031   1,436,000 1,412,318
Evergy Incorporated   2.45 9-15-2024   3,326,000 3,486,364
Evergy Incorporated   2.90 9-15-2029   2,363,000 2,440,416
Evergy Kansas Central Incorporated   3.45 4-15-2050   2,981,000 3,141,950
Eversource Energy   2.55 3-15-2031   2,672,000 2,706,600
Interstate Power & Light Company   3.50 9-30-2049   1,363,000 1,414,259
ITC Holdings Corporation   2.70 11-15-2022   3,599,000 3,707,235
Metropolitan Edison Company 144A   4.30 1-15-2029   3,981,000 4,404,902
Mid-Atlantic Interstate Transmission LLC 144A   4.10 5-15-2028   514,000 570,638
Mississippi Power Company   3.95 3-30-2028   4,390,000 4,895,132
Mississippi Power Company   4.25 3-15-2042   2,636,000 3,003,065
Northern States Power Company   2.25 4-1-2031   1,772,000 1,796,772
Northern States Power Company   3.20 4-1-2052   1,790,000 1,836,686
Pacific Gas & Electric Company   2.10 8-1-2027   6,068,000 5,851,555
Pacific Gas & Electric Company   2.50 2-1-2031   4,908,000 4,536,092
Pacific Gas & Electric Company   3.30 8-1-2040   136,000 119,436
Pacific Gas & Electric Company   3.50 8-1-2050   635,000 549,035
Pacific Gas & Electric Company   3.95 12-1-2047   3,413,000 3,046,295
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio  |  43


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Electric utilities (continued)            
Pacific Gas & Electric Company   4.20% 6-1-2041 $   1,536,000 $     1,477,198
Pacific Gas & Electric Company   4.50 7-1-2040       909,000       891,632
Pacific Gas & Electric Company   4.55 7-1-2030     1,282,000     1,348,577
Pacific Gas & Electric Company   4.75 2-15-2044       891,000       878,911
Pacific Gas & Electric Company   4.95 7-1-2050     1,782,000     1,801,541
Pennsylvania Electric Company 144A   3.25 3-15-2028     1,509,000     1,567,483
Public Service Company of Colorado   1.88 6-15-2031     4,081,000     3,977,466
Public Service Electric and Gas Company   2.05 8-1-2050       736,000       604,698
Public Service Electric and Gas Company   2.70 5-1-2050     3,954,000     3,723,689
Southern California Edison Company   1.75 3-15-2028     2,663,000     2,618,835
Southern California Edison Company   4.13 3-1-2048     1,991,000     2,058,615
Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Company 144A   3.85 6-1-2025     1,254,000     1,356,067
Virginia Electric & Power Company   2.45 12-15-2050     2,600,000     2,283,313
               85,291,302
Gas utilities: 0.08%            
Piemont Natural Gas Company   2.50 3-15-2031     2,672,000     2,678,439
Southern Company Gas Capital Corporation   1.75 1-15-2031     2,181,000     2,036,154
                4,714,593
Independent power & renewable electricity
producers: 0.07%
           
AES Corporation 144A   1.38 1-15-2026     3,835,000     3,791,617
Multi-utilities: 0.72%            
Ameren Corporation   1.75 3-15-2028     1,772,000     1,751,086
Black Hills Corporation   3.05 10-15-2029     2,181,000     2,289,756
Black Hills Corporation   3.88 10-15-2049   1,600,000 1,651,685
Consumers Energy Company   2.50 5-1-2060   1,509,000 1,289,969
Dominion Energy Incorporated   1.45 4-15-2026   5,580,000 5,613,993
Dominion Energy Incorporated   2.00 8-15-2021   2,508,000 2,513,139
Dominion Energy Incorporated   3.30 4-15-2041   1,436,000 1,446,021
DTE Energy Company   1.05 6-1-2025   3,626,000 3,620,714
DTE Energy Company   2.95 3-1-2030   2,381,000 2,474,822
DTE Energy Company   2.95 3-1-2050   3,935,000 3,809,557
DTE Energy Company   3.80 3-15-2027   3,590,000 3,999,707
NextEra Energy Capital Company   2.25 6-1-2030   2,908,000 2,896,318
WEC Energy Group Incorporated   0.80 3-15-2024   4,500,000 4,515,429
WEC Energy Group Incorporated   1.38 10-15-2027   2,582,000 2,521,411
            40,393,607
Total Corporate bonds and notes (Cost $1,365,404,234)           1,379,379,556
Municipal obligations: 0.39%            
Nevada: 0.09%            
Airport revenue: 0.09%            
Clark County NV Airport Authority Build America Bonds Series C   6.82 7-1-2045   3,365,000 5,110,443
New York: 0.12%            
Airport revenue: 0.12%            
Port Authority of New York & New Jersey Consolidated Bonds Series 174   4.46 10-1-2062   5,505,000 6,958,134
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

44  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Ohio: 0.05%            
Education revenue: 0.05%            
Ohio State University General Receipts Taxable Bonds Series A   4.80% 6-1-2111 $   1,957,000 $    2,632,602
Texas: 0.13%            
Education revenue: 0.03%            
University of Texas Financing System Bond Series B   2.44 8-15-2049     1,695,000     1,583,761
Transportation revenue: 0.10%            
North Texas Tollway Authority   6.72 1-1-2049     3,609,000     5,788,456
Total Municipal obligations (Cost $17,173,809)              22,073,396
Non-agency mortgage-backed securities: 3.97%            
Angel Oak Mortgage Trust Series 2019-2 Class A1 144A±±   3.63 3-25-2049     1,161,490     1,176,866
Angel Oak Mortgage Trust Series 2020-2 Class A1 144A±±   2.53 1-26-2065     3,451,870     3,514,567
Angel Oak Mortgage Trust Series 2020-5 Class A1 144A±±   1.37 5-25-2065     1,678,346     1,686,850
Benchmark Mortgage Trust Series 2021-B25 Class A5   2.58 4-15-2054     2,527,000     2,618,393
Benchmark Mortgage Trust Series 2021-B26 Class A5   2.61 6-15-2054     5,429,000     5,630,827
Bunker Hill Loan Depositary Trust Series 2019-2 Class A1 144A   2.88 7-25-2049     3,421,055     3,492,365
Bunker Hill Loan Depositary Trust Series 2019-3 Class A1 144A   2.72 11-25-2059     3,803,880     3,884,879
CD Commercial Mortgage Trust Series 2019-CD8 Class A4   2.91 8-15-2057     2,221,000     2,356,652
CFCRE Commercial Mortgage Trust Series 2017-C8 Class ASB   3.37 6-15-2050     2,014,000     2,156,958
Colt Funding LLC Series 2019-4 Class A1 144A±±   2.58 11-25-2049     2,422,709     2,434,182
Colt Funding LLC Series 2020-2 Class A1 144A±±   1.85 3-25-2065     2,604,209     2,623,994
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificate Series 2015-LC21 Class A4   3.71 7-10-2048     1,777,000     1,951,835
Commercial Mortgage Trust Series 2013-CR10 Class A4 ±±   4.21 8-10-2046        89,000        95,447
Commercial Mortgage Trust Series 2013-CR11 Class A4   4.26 8-10-2050    10,048,000    10,830,679
Commercial Mortgage Trust Series 2013-CR6 Class A4   3.10 3-10-2046   8,286,000 8,535,362
Commercial Mortgage Trust Series 2014-UBS4 Class A4   3.42 8-10-2047   4,323,000 4,582,116
Commercial Mortgage Trust Series 2015-LC23 Class A3   3.52 10-10-2048   2,043,000 2,190,074
CSAIL Commercial Mortgage Trust Series 2015-C2 Class A4   3.50 6-15-2057   2,484,176 2,696,538
CSAIL Commercial Mortgage Trust Series 2015-C4 Class A4   3.81 11-15-2048   2,010,200 2,225,198
CSAIL Commercial Mortgage Trust Series 2019-C16 Class A3   3.33 6-15-2052   4,640,000 5,054,792
CSAIL Commercial Mortgage Trust Series 2019-C17 Class A4   2.76 9-15-2052   2,583,000 2,699,362
CSAIL Commercial Mortgage Trust Series 2021-C20 Class A3   2.80 3-15-2054   5,361,000 5,615,528
GCAT Series 2019-NQM1 Class A1 144A   2.99 2-25-2059   1,187,854 1,193,651
Goldman Sachs Mortgage Securities Trust Series 2014-GC18 Class A4   4.07 1-10-2047   5,804,323 6,240,849
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio  |  45


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Non-agency mortgage-backed securities (continued)            
Goldman Sachs Mortgage Securities Trust Series 2020-GSA2 Class A4   1.72% 12-12-2053 $   4,801,000 $    4,667,962
Impact Funding LLC Series 2010-1 Class A1 144A   5.31 1-25-2051     5,968,349     6,366,241
JPMDB Commercial Mortgage Securities Series 2014-C23 Class A4   3.67 9-15-2047     1,746,083     1,870,156
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust Series 2015-C28 Class A3   2.91 10-15-2048     9,951,788    10,351,626
Mello Warehouse Securitization Trust Series 2020-2 Class A (1 Month LIBOR+0.80%)144A±   0.91 11-25-2053     5,688,000     5,706,132
Mello Warehouse Securitization Trust Series 2021-1 Class A (1 Month LIBOR+0.70%)144A±   0.81 2-25-2055     1,606,000     1,607,913
Mello Warehouse Securitization Trust Series 2021-2 Class A (1 Month LIBOR+0.75%)144A±   0.86 4-25-2055     4,340,000     4,341,262
Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust Series 2012-C5 Class A4   3.18 8-15-2045     1,321,000     1,346,088
Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust Series 2015-C20 Class A4   3.25 2-15-2048       800,041       861,592
Morgan Stanley Capital International Trust Series 2020-HR8 Class A3   1.79 7-15-2053     3,438,000     3,359,417
Morgan Stanley Capital International Trust Series 2021-L5 Class A4   2.73 5-15-2054     3,618,000     3,784,588
New Residential Mortgage Loan Trust Series 2019-NQM4 Class A1 144A±±   2.49 9-25-2059     2,474,664     2,516,763
NewRez WareHouse Securitization Series 2021-1 Class A (1 Month LIBOR+0.75%)144A±   0.86 5-25-2055    11,283,000    11,296,515
SG Capital Partners Series 2019-3 Class A1 144A±±   2.70 9-25-2059     1,826,747     1,842,587
Starwood Mortgage Residential Trust Series 2019-INV1 Class A1 144A±±   2.61 9-27-2049     2,559,329     2,595,349
Starwood Mortgage Residential Trust Series 2020-1 Class A1 144A±±   2.28 2-25-2050     4,726,659     4,788,165
Starwood Mortgage Residential Trust Series 2020-INV1 Class A1 144A±±   1.03 11-25-2055     3,400,727     3,399,508
Starwood Mortgage Residential Trust Series 2020-INV3 Class A1 144A±±   1.49 4-25-2065     4,477,895     4,526,461
Starwood Mortgage Residential Trust Series 2021-1 Class A1 144A±±   1.22 5-25-2065     3,606,781     3,620,610
Verizon Master Trust Series 2021=1 Class A   0.86 5-20-2027     8,833,000     8,819,261
Verus Securitization Trust Series 2019-2 Class A1 144A±±   2.91 7-25-2059     2,913,379     2,964,021
Verus Securitization Trust Series 2019-3 Class A1 144A±±   2.69 11-25-2059     1,947,089     1,982,038
Verus Securitization Trust Series 2019-3 Class A1 144A   2.78 7-25-2059     4,811,624     4,888,614
Verus Securitization Trust Series 2019-4 Class A1 144A   2.64 11-25-2059   6,737,436 6,845,416
Verus Securitization Trust Series 2020-1 Class A1 144A   2.42 1-25-2060   1,565,020 1,588,059
Verus Securitization Trust Series 2020-2 Class A1 144A±±   2.23 5-25-2060   5,584,317 5,637,622
Verus Securitization Trust Series 2020-5 Class A1 144A   1.22 5-25-2065   1,389,612 1,395,135
Verus Securitization Trust Series 2021-1 Class A1 144A±±   0.82 1-25-2066   4,445,016 4,436,218
Verus Securitization Trust Series 2021-2 Class A1 144A±±   1.03 2-25-2066   7,256,594 7,262,468
Verus Securitization Trust Series 2021-R1 Class A1 144A±±   0.82 10-25-2063   5,507,832 5,485,995
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

46  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Non-agency mortgage-backed securities (continued)            
Verus Securitization Trust Series 2021-R3 Class A1 144A♦±±   1.02% 4-25-2064 $   4,862,000 $     4,861,985
Visio Trust Series 2020-1R Class A1 144A   1.31 11-25-2055     3,742,497     3,758,188
Total Non-agency mortgage-backed securities (Cost $222,807,698)             224,261,919
U.S. Treasury securities: 33.16%            
U.S. Treasury Bond   1.13 5-15-2040    87,097,000    72,606,917
U.S. Treasury Bond   1.13 8-15-2040    97,084,000    80,610,059
U.S. Treasury Bond   1.38 11-15-2040    98,406,000    85,351,829
U.S. Treasury Bond   1.38 8-15-2050    30,117,000    24,111,247
U.S. Treasury Bond   1.63 11-15-2050    31,350,000    26,784,656
U.S. Treasury Bond   1.88 2-15-2041    66,944,000    63,398,060
U.S. Treasury Bond   1.88 2-15-2051    28,818,000    26,201,866
U.S. Treasury Bond   2.50 2-15-2045    30,554,000    31,832,255
U.S. Treasury Note   0.13 5-31-2022    33,602,000    33,617,751
U.S. Treasury Note   0.13 9-30-2022    29,297,000    29,305,011
U.S. Treasury Note ##   0.13 10-31-2022    65,327,000    65,344,863
U.S. Treasury Note ##   0.13 12-31-2022    74,138,000    74,149,584
U.S. Treasury Note ##   0.13 1-31-2023    71,738,000    71,738,000
U.S. Treasury Note   0.13 2-28-2023    16,692,000    16,691,348
U.S. Treasury Note   0.13 3-31-2023    51,066,000    51,058,021
U.S. Treasury Note   0.13 4-30-2023    12,824,000    12,819,993
U.S. Treasury Note %%   0.13 5-31-2023    15,160,000    15,153,486
U.S. Treasury Note ##   0.13 8-15-2023    65,727,000    65,655,111
U.S. Treasury Note   0.13 9-15-2023    12,604,000    12,586,276
U.S. Treasury Note   0.13 10-15-2023   16,285,000 16,259,555
U.S. Treasury Note ##   0.13 1-15-2024   75,934,000 75,711,537
U.S. Treasury Note ##   0.25 5-15-2024   149,725,000 149,491,054
U.S. Treasury Note   0.25 9-30-2025   33,600,000 33,023,812
U.S. Treasury Note   0.25 10-31-2025   61,838,000 60,688,200
U.S. Treasury Note   0.38 4-15-2024   41,236,000 41,339,090
U.S. Treasury Note ##   0.38 11-30-2025   69,398,000 68,405,825
U.S. Treasury Note   0.38 12-31-2025   52,737,000 51,927,405
U.S. Treasury Note ##   0.50 2-28-2026   73,816,000 72,939,435
U.S. Treasury Note   0.50 8-31-2027   51,297,000 49,381,378
U.S. Treasury Note   0.75 4-30-2026   57,748,000 57,639,723
U.S. Treasury Note %%   0.75 5-31-2026   39,679,000 39,570,503
U.S. Treasury Note   0.75 1-31-2028   23,660,000 22,964,988
U.S. Treasury Note   1.50 11-30-2024   36,672,000 38,018,550
U.S. Treasury Note   1.63 5-15-2031   48,855,000 48,946,603
U.S. Treasury Note   1.75 11-30-2021   5,241,000 5,285,221
U.S. Treasury Note   1.75 2-28-2022   3,579,000 3,624,157
U.S. Treasury Note ##   1.88 2-28-2022   62,004,000 62,846,867
U.S. Treasury Note   2.00 2-15-2022   45,444,000 46,072,405
U.S. Treasury Note   2.13 8-15-2021   12,435,000 12,489,148
U.S. Treasury Note %%   2.25 5-15-2041   3,581,000 3,608,417
U.S. Treasury Note   2.38 5-15-2051   24,643,000 25,120,458
U.S. Treasury Note   2.88 10-31-2023   25,086,000 26,700,911
Total U.S. Treasury securities (Cost $1,905,705,446)           1,871,071,575
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio  |  47


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Yankee corporate bonds and notes: 3.86%            
Communication services: 0.10%            
Interactive media & services: 0.07%            
Tencent Holdings Limited 144A   3.84% 4-22-2051 $   3,709,000 $    3,748,315
Wireless telecommunication services: 0.03%            
Telefonica Emisiones SA   5.52 3-1-2049     1,423,000     1,764,481
Energy: 0.52%            
Oil, gas & consumable fuels: 0.52%            
Aker BP ASA 144A   4.00 1-15-2031     2,549,000     2,744,956
Equinor ASA   3.25 11-18-2049     1,309,000     1,324,890
Galaxy Pipeline Assets Company 144A   1.75 9-30-2027     5,444,000     5,491,714
Galaxy Pipeline Assets Company 144A   2.16 3-31-2034     4,107,000     4,053,427
Galaxy Pipeline Assets Company 144A   2.63 3-31-2036     2,555,000     2,503,993
Galaxy Pipeline Assets Company 144A   2.94 9-30-2040     2,725,000     2,697,934
Oleoducto Central SA 144A   4.00 7-14-2027     2,151,000     2,231,017
Petroleos del Peru 144A   5.63 6-19-2047     2,568,000     2,653,232
Petroleos Mexicanos Company   2.38 4-15-2025     1,451,600     1,509,150
Petroleos Mexicanos Company   2.46 12-15-2025     4,032,500     4,211,977
               29,422,290
Financials: 2.32%            
Banks: 1.07%            
Banco Santander SA   2.96 3-25-2031     1,800,000     1,833,907
Barclays plc (1 Year Treasury Constant Maturity+0.80%) ±   1.01 12-10-2024     7,278,000     7,317,854
Barclays plc (5 Year Treasury Constant Maturity+2.90%) ±   3.56 9-23-2035     9,826,000    10,049,935
Barclays plc (1 Year Treasury Constant Maturity+1.70%) ±   3.81 3-10-2042   3,440,000 3,447,205
BNP Paribas (U.S. SOFR+1.00%) 144A±   1.32 1-13-2027   6,627,000 6,558,826
BNP Paribas (U.S. SOFR+1.39%) 144A±   2.87 4-19-2032   5,578,000 5,649,404
DNB Bank ASA (1 Year Treasury Constant Maturity+0.72%) 144A±   1.54 5-25-2027   4,671,000 4,689,071
Societe Generale 144A   3.63 3-1-2041   3,105,000 3,023,090
Societe Generale (5 Year Treasury Constant Maturity+3.00%) 144A±   3.65 7-8-2035   3,522,000 3,615,949
Swedish Export Credit Corporation   0.75 4-6-2023   7,752,000 7,821,232
Westpac Banking Corporation (5 Year Treasury Constant Maturity+1.75%) ±   2.67 11-15-2035   6,317,000 6,130,143
            60,136,616
Capital markets: 0.15%            
Antares Holdings LP 144A   3.95 7-15-2026   3,691,000 3,824,297
Credit Suisse Group AG (U.S. SOFR+1.73%) 144A±   3.09 5-14-2032   4,708,000 4,777,742
            8,602,039
Consumer finance: 0.16%            
NTT Finance Corporation 144A   1.16 4-3-2026   8,989,000 8,960,752
Diversified financial services: 0.83%            
DAE Funding LLC 144A   2.63 3-20-2025   2,964,000 2,994,351
DAE Funding LLC 144A   3.38 3-20-2028   4,264,000 4,281,482
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

48  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Diversified financial services (continued)            
DH Europe Finance II   2.05% 11-15-2022 $   2,836,000 $     2,905,368
DH Europe Finance II   2.20 11-15-2024     4,881,000     5,122,454
DH Europe Finance II   2.60 11-15-2029     3,617,000     3,742,946
GE Capital International Funding Company   4.42 11-15-2035     7,730,000     8,986,462
Siemens Financieringsmaatschappij NV Company 144A   0.65 3-11-2024     1,121,000     1,124,985
Trust Fibrauno 144A   5.25 1-30-2026     2,805,000     3,141,600
Trust Fibrauno 144A   6.39 1-15-2050     3,094,000     3,575,241
UBS Group AG (1 Year Treasury Constant Maturity+1.00%) 144A±   2.10 2-11-2032    11,651,000    11,193,805
               47,068,694
Insurance: 0.11%            
Athene Holding Limited   3.50 1-15-2031     1,345,000     1,415,931
Athene Holding Limited   3.95 5-25-2051       727,000       740,330
Athene Holding Limited   4.13 1-12-2028     3,590,000     3,976,607
                6,132,868
Health care: 0.50%            
Health care equipment & supplies: 0.09%            
Steris plc   3.75 3-15-2051     5,093,000     5,203,712
Pharmaceuticals: 0.41%            
Astrazeneca plc   1.38 8-6-2030     2,936,000     2,754,660
Astrazeneca plc   3.00 5-28-2051     1,811,000     1,782,793
Shire Acquisitions Investments Ireland Designated Activity Company   2.88 9-23-2023     3,699,000     3,883,785
Takeda Pharmaceutical   2.05 3-31-2030     6,799,000     6,634,513
Takeda Pharmaceutical   3.18 7-9-2050     4,327,000     4,143,358
Takeda Pharmaceutical   4.40 11-26-2023   3,391,000 3,698,758
            22,897,867
Industrials: 0.09%            
Transportation infrastructure: 0.09%            
Adani Ports & Special Company 144A   3.00 2-16-2031   1,632,000 1,577,746
Adani Ports & Special Company 144A   4.20 8-4-2027   3,284,000 3,486,613
            5,064,359
Information technology: 0.14%            
Semiconductors & semiconductor equipment: 0.14%            
NXP BV 144A   3.15 5-1-2027   1,773,000 1,904,449
NXP BV 144A   3.25 5-11-2041   1,946,000 1,945,324
NXP BV 144A   3.88 6-18-2026   3,699,000 4,110,719
            7,960,492
Materials: 0.14%            
Metals & mining: 0.14%            
Teck Resources Limited   3.90 7-15-2030   1,600,000 1,710,199
Teck Resources Limited   5.20 3-1-2042   2,099,000 2,411,074
Teck Resources Limited   6.13 10-1-2035   845,000 1,058,625
Teck Resources Limited   6.25 7-15-2041   2,044,000 2,646,651
            7,826,549
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio  |  49


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Real estate: 0.05%            
Equity REITs: 0.05%            
Scentre Group Trust 144A   3.63% 1-28-2026 $   2,808,000 $    3,070,542
Total Yankee corporate bonds and notes (Cost $215,102,906)             217,859,576
Yankee government bonds: 1.35%            
Abu Dhabi Government International 144A   2.50 4-16-2025     2,764,000     2,929,840
Italy Government International Bond   3.88 5-6-2051     4,288,000     4,391,945
Japan Bank for International Cooperation   1.75 10-17-2024     5,044,000     5,241,286
Republic Chile   2.45 1-31-2031     2,769,000     2,789,795
Republic Chile   3.10 5-7-2041     3,129,000     3,043,453
Republic of Colombia   3.25 4-22-2032     1,891,000     1,824,626
Republic of Colombia   3.88 2-15-2061     4,394,000     3,766,757
Republic of Paraguay 144A   2.74 1-29-2033     2,512,000     2,424,080
Republic of Paraguay 144A   5.40 3-30-2050     3,704,000     4,218,893
Republic of Peru   2.39 1-23-2026     3,718,000     3,829,131
Republic of Peru   2.78 1-23-2031    10,249,000    10,274,725
Republic of Peru   3.30 3-11-2041     4,954,000     4,793,045
United Mexican States   2.66 5-24-2031     1,932,000     1,875,644
United Mexican States   3.75 4-19-2071     6,305,000     5,670,339
United Mexican States   3.77 5-24-2061     1,076,000       984,551
United Mexican States   4.28 8-14-2041     7,016,000     7,280,644
United Mexican States   4.35 1-15-2047     1,088,000     1,119,139
United Mexican States   4.50 4-22-2029     6,776,000     7,656,677
United Mexican States   4.75 3-8-2044     1,818,000     1,977,093
Total Yankee government bonds (Cost $74,981,656)           76,091,663
    
    Yield   Shares  
Short-term investments: 4.79%            
Investment companies: 4.79%            
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class ♠∞##   0.03     270,350,377   270,350,377
Total Short-term investments (Cost $270,350,377)             270,350,377
Total investments in securities (Cost $6,271,968,718) 111.48%         6,289,888,918
Other assets and liabilities, net (11.48)          (647,756,218)
Total net assets 100.00%         $5,642,132,700
    
± Variable rate investment. The rate shown is the rate in effect at period end.
±± The coupon of the security is adjusted based on the principal and interest payments received from the underlying pool of mortgages as well as the credit quality and the actual prepayment speed of the underlying mortgages.
144A The security may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers, pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933.
The security is fair valued in accordance with procedures approved by the Board of Trustees.
## All or a portion of this security is segregated for when-issued securities.
The issuer is an affiliate of the Portfolio as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The rate represents the 7-day annualized yield at period end.
%% The security is purchased on a when-issued basis.
    
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

50  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

Abbreviations:
FHLMC Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
FNMA Federal National Mortgage Association
GNMA Government National Mortgage Association
LIBOR London Interbank Offered Rate
REIT Real estate investment trust
SOFR Secured Overnight Financing Rate
Investments in affiliates
An affiliated investment is an investment in which the Portfolio owns at least 5% of the outstanding voting shares of the issuer or as a result of other relationships, such as the Portfolio and the issuer having the same adviser or investment manager. Transactions with issuers that were either affiliates of the Portfolio at the beginning of the period or the end of the period were as follows:
  Value,
beginning of
period
Purchases Sales
proceeds
Net
realized
gains
(losses)
  Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses)
  Value,
end of
period
  % of
net
assets
Shares,
end
of period
Income
from
affiliated
securities
Short-term
investments
                       
Investment
companies
                       
Securities Lending Cash Investments LLC $ 0 $ 258,907,382 $ (258,907,382) $0   $0   $ 0     0 $ 4,340#
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class 315,907,475 5,199,623,937 (5,245,181,035) 0   0   270,350,377     270,350,377 156,045
        $0   $0   $270,350,377   4.79%   $160,385
    
# Amount shown represents income before fees and rebates.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio  |  51


Statement of assets and liabilities—May 31, 2021
   
Assets  
Investments in unaffiliated securities, at value (cost $6,001,618,341)

$ 6,019,538,541
Investments in affiliated securites, at value (cost $270,350,377)

270,350,377
Receivable for investments sold

520,101,636
Receivable for interest

18,659,764
Prepaid expenses and other assets

504,195
Total assets

6,829,154,513
Liabilities  
Payable for when-issued transactions

921,380,460
Payable for investments purchased

263,040,952
Advisory fee payable

1,650,401
Cash collateral due to broker

550,000
Overdraft due to custodian bank

400,000
Total liabilities

1,187,021,813
Total net assets

$5,642,132,700
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

52  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio


Statement of operations—year ended May 31, 2021
   
Investment income  
Interest (net of foreign withholding taxes of $2,200)

$ 98,367,183
Income from affiliated securities

183,058
Total investment income

98,550,241
Expenses  
Advisory fee

20,304,036
Custody and accounting fees

288,180
Professional fees

100,400
Interest holder report expenses

10,322
Trustees’ fees and expenses

19,186
Other fees and expenses

104,473
Total expenses

20,826,597
Net investment income

77,723,644
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments  
Net realized gains on investments

129,629,293
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

(171,533,989)
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

(41,904,696)
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

$ 35,818,948
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio  |  53


Statement of changes in net assets
     
  Year ended
May 31, 2021
Year ended
May 31, 2020
Operations    
Net investment income

$ 77,723,644 $ 132,899,852
Net realized gains on investments

129,629,293 327,904,415
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

(171,533,989) 58,392,982
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

35,818,948 519,197,249
Capital transactions    
Transactions in investors’ beneficial interests    
Contributions

1,103,776,459 2,488,553,741
Withdrawals

(1,259,318,551) (3,071,640,078)
Net decrease in net assets resulting from capital transactions

(155,542,092) (583,086,337)
Total decrease in net assets

(119,723,144) (63,889,088)
Net assets    
Beginning of period

5,761,855,844 5,825,744,932
End of period

$ 5,642,132,700 $ 5,761,855,844
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

54  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio


Financial highlights
  Year ended May 31
  2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Total return

0.65% 9.49% 6.30% (0.53)% 1.89%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)          
Gross expenses

0.35% 0.35% 0.35% 0.35% 0.35%
Net expenses

0.35% 0.35% 0.35% 0.35% 0.35%
Net investment income

1.30% 2.28% 2.93% 2.23% 1.87%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate

457% 603% 577% 542% 614%
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio  |  55


Notes to financial statements
1. ORGANIZATION
Wells Fargo Master Trust (the "Trust"), a Delaware statutory trust organized on March 10, 1999, is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). As an investment company, the Trust follows the accounting and reporting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, Financial Services – Investment Companies. These financial statements report on the Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio (the "Portfolio") which is a diversified series of the Trust.
Interests in the Portfolio are available solely through private placement transactions that do not involve any "public offering" within the meaning of Section 4(2) of the Investment Company Act of 1933.
On February 23, 2021, Wells Fargo & Company announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management ("WFAM") to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. WFAM is the trade name used by the asset management businesses of Wells Fargo & Company and includes Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the adviser to the Portfolio, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, both registered investment advisers providing sub-advisory services to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Portfolio's principal underwriter. As part of the transaction, Wells Fargo & Company will own a 9.9% equity interest and will continue to serve as an important client and distribution partner.
Consummation of the transaction will result in the automatic termination of the Portfolio's advisory agreement and subadvisory agreement. The Portfolio's Board of Trustees approved a new advisory and new subadvisory agreement and approved submitting the agreements to the Portfolio’s interest holders for approval at a special meeting of interest holders expected to be held on August 16, 2021. Interest holders of record of the Portfolio at the close of business on May 28, 2021 are entitled to vote at the meeting. If interest holders approve the new agreements, they would take effect upon the closing of the transaction. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following significant accounting policies, which are consistently followed in the preparation of the financial statements of the Portfolio, are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Securities valuation
All investments are valued each business day as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4 p.m. Eastern Time), although the Portfolio may deviate from this calculation time under unusual or unexpected circumstances.
Debt securities are valued at the evaluated bid price provided by an independent pricing service (e.g. taking into account various factors, including yields, maturities, or credit ratings) or, if a reliable price is not available, the quoted bid price from an independent broker-dealer.
The values of securities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at rates provided by an independent foreign currency pricing source at a time each business day specified by the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee at Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC ("Funds Management").
Investments in registered open-end investment companies are valued at net asset value. Interests in non-registered investment companies that are redeemable at net asset value are fair valued normally at net asset value.
Investments which are not valued using any of the methods discussed above are valued at their fair value, as determined in good faith by the Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees has established a Valuation Committee comprised of the Trustees and has delegated to it the authority to take any actions regarding the valuation of portfolio securities that the Valuation Committee deems necessary or appropriate, including determining the fair value of portfolio securities, unless the determination has been delegated to the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee. The Board of Trustees retains the authority to make or ratify any valuation decisions or approve any changes to the Valuation Procedures as it deems appropriate. On a quarterly basis, the Board of Trustees receives reports on any valuation actions taken by the Valuation Committee or the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee which may include items for ratification.
Foreign currency translation
The accounting records of the Portfolio are maintained in U.S. dollars. The values of other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at rates provided by an independent foreign currency pricing source at a time

56  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio


Notes to financial statements
each business day specified by the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee. Purchases and sales of securities, and income and expenses are converted at the rate of exchange on the respective dates of such transactions. Net realized foreign exchange gains or losses arise from sales of foreign currencies, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest and foreign withholding taxes recorded and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually paid or received. Net unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses arise from changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities other than investments in securities resulting from changes in exchange rates. The changes in net assets arising from changes in exchange rates of securities and the changes in net assets resulting from changes in market prices of securities are not separately presented. Such changes are included in net realized and unrealized gains or losses from investments.
Securities lending
The Portfolio may lend its securities from time to time in order to earn additional income in the form of fees or interest on securities received as collateral or the investment of any cash received as collateral. When securities are on loan, the Portfolio receives interest or dividends on those securities. Cash collateral received in connection with its securities lending transactions is invested in Securities Lending Cash Investments, LLC (the "Securities Lending Fund"). Investments in Securities Lending Fund are valued at the evaluated bid price provided by an independent pricing service. Income earned from investment in the Securities Lending Fund (net of fees and rebates), if any, is included in income from affiliated securities on the Statement of Operations.
In a securities lending transaction, the net asset value of the Portfolio is affected by an increase or decrease in the value of the securities loaned and by an increase or decrease in the value of the instrument in which collateral is invested. The amount of securities lending activity undertaken by the Portfolio fluctuates from time to time. The Portfolio has the right under the lending agreement to recover the securities from the borrower on demand. In the event of default or bankruptcy by the borrower, the Portfolio may be prevented from recovering the loaned securities or gaining access to the collateral or may experience delays or costs in doing so. In such an event, the terms of the agreement allow the unaffiliated securities lending agent to use the collateral to purchase replacement securities on behalf of the Portfolio or pay the Portfolio the market value of the loaned securities. The Portfolio bears the risk of loss with respect to depreciation of its investment of the cash collateral.
When-issued transactions
The Portfolio may purchase securities on a forward commitment or when-issued basis. The Portfolio records a when-issued transaction on the trade date and will segregate assets in an amount at least equal in value to the Portfolio's commitment to purchase when-issued securities. Securities purchased on a when-issued basis are marked-to-market daily and the Portfolio begins earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may arise due to changes in the market value of the underlying securities or if the counterparty does not perform under the contract.
Security transactions and income recognition
Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains or losses are recorded on the basis of identified cost.
Interest income is accrued daily and bond discounts are accreted and premiums are amortized daily. To the extent debt obligations are placed on non-accrual status, any related interest income may be reduced by writing off interest receivables when the collection of all or a portion of interest has been determined to be doubtful based on consistently applied procedures and the fair value has decreased. If the issuer subsequently resumes interest payments or when the collectability of interest is reasonably assured, the debt obligation is removed from non-accrual status. Interest income is recorded net of foreign taxes withheld where recovery of such taxes is not assured. Paydown gains and losses are included in interest income.
Federal and other taxes
The Portfolio is not required to pay federal income taxes on its net investment income and net capital gains as it is treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. All income, gains and losses of the Portfolio are deemed to have been “passed through” to the interest holders in proportion to their holdings of the Portfolio regardless of whether income and gains have been distributed by the Portfolio.
The Portfolio’s income tax returns and all financial records supporting those returns for the prior three fiscal years are subject to examination by the federal revenue authority. Management has analyzed the Portfolio’s tax positions taken on federal, state, and foreign tax returns for all open tax years and does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio  |  57


Notes to financial statements
As of May 31, 2021, the aggregate cost of all investments for federal income tax purposes was $6,291,223,417 and the unrealized gains (losses) consisted of:
Gross unrealized gains $ 77,287,617
Gross unrealized losses (78,622,116)
Net unrealized losses $ (1,334,499)
3. FAIR VALUATION MEASUREMENTS
Fair value measurements of investments are determined within a framework that has established a fair value hierarchy based upon the various data inputs utilized in determining the value of the Portfolio’s investments. The three-level hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The Portfolio’s investments are classified within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The inputs are summarized into three broad levels as follows:
Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical securities
Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Portfolio’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs or methodologies used for valuing investments in securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s assets and liabilities as of May 31, 2021:
  Quoted prices
(Level 1)
Other significant
observable inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
unobservable inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Assets        
Investments in:        
Agency securities $ 0 $ 1,772,000,438 $0 $ 1,772,000,438
Asset-backed securities 0 456,800,418 0 456,800,418
Corporate bonds and notes 0 1,379,379,556 0 1,379,379,556
Municipal obligations 0 22,073,396 0 22,073,396
Non-agency mortgage-backed securities 0 224,261,919 0 224,261,919
U.S. Treasury securities 1,871,071,575 0 0 1,871,071,575
Yankee corporate bonds and notes 0 217,859,576 0 217,859,576
Yankee government bonds 0 76,091,663 0 76,091,663
Short-term investments        
Investment companies 270,350,377 0 0 270,350,377
Total assets $2,141,421,952 $4,148,466,966 $0 $6,289,888,918
Additional sector, industry or geographic detail, if any, is included in the Portfolio of Investments.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the Portfolio did not have any transfers into/out of Level 3.
4. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
Advisory fee
The Trust has entered into an advisory contract with Funds Management, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company ("Wells Fargo"). The adviser is responsible for implementing investment policies and guidelines and for supervising the subadviser, who is responsible for day-to-day portfolio management of the Portfolio. Pursuant to the contract, Funds Management is entitled to receive an advisory fee at the following annual rate based on the Portfolio’s average daily net assets:

58  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio


Notes to financial statements
Average daily net assets Advisory fee
First $500 million 0.400%
Next $500 million 0.375
Next $2 billion 0.350
Next $2 billion 0.325
Next $5 billion 0.300
Over $10 billion 0.290
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the advisory fee was equivalent to an annual rate of 0.34% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets.
Funds Management has retained the services of a subadviser to provide daily portfolio management to the Portfolio. The fee for subadvisory services is borne by Funds Management. Wells Capital Management Incorporated ("WellsCap"), an affiliate of Funds Management and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo, is the subadviser to the Portfolio and is entitled to receive a fee from Funds Management at an annual rate starting at 0.20% and declining to 0.10% as the average daily net assets of the Portfolio increase.
Interfund transactions
The Portfolio may purchase or sell portfolio investment securities to certain other Wells Fargo affiliates pursuant to Rule 17a-7 under the 1940 Act and under procedures adopted by the Board of Trustees. The procedures have been designed to ensure that these interfund transactions, which do not incur broker commissions, are effected at current market prices.
5. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS
Purchases and sales of investments, excluding short-term securities, for the year ended May 31, 2021 were as follows:
Purchases at cost   Sales proceeds
U.S.
government
Non-U.S.
government
  U.S.
government
Non-U.S.
government
$25,535,996,163 $4,077,887,905   $24,622,078,999 $4,220,031,795
6. SECURITIES LENDING TRANSACTIONS
The Portfolio lends its securities through an unaffiliated securities lending agent and receives collateral in the form of cash or securities with a value at least equal to the value of the securities on loan. The value of the loaned securities is determined at the close of each business day and any increases or decreases in the required collateral are exchanged between the Portfolio and the counterparty on the next business day. Cash collateral received is invested in the Securities Lending Fund which seeks to provide a positive return compared to the daily Federal Funds Open Rate by investing in high-quality, U.S. dollar-denominated short-term money market instruments and is exempt from registration under Section 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act. Securities Lending Fund is managed by Funds Management and is subadvised by WellsCap. Funds Management receives an advisory fee starting at 0.05% and declining to 0.01% as the average daily net assets of the Securities Lending Fund increase. All of the fees received by Funds Management are paid to WellsCap for its services as subadviser.
In the event of counterparty default or the failure of a borrower to return a loaned security, the Portfolio has the right to use the collateral to offset any losses incurred. As of May 31, 2021, the Portfolio did not have any securities on loan.
7. BANK BORROWINGS
The Trust, along with Wells Fargo Variable Trust and Wells Fargo Funds Trust (excluding the money market funds), are parties to a $350,000,000 revolving credit agreement whereby the Portfolio is permitted to use bank borrowings for temporary or emergency purposes, such as to fund interest holders withdrawal requests. Interest under the credit agreement is charged to the Portfolio based on a borrowing rate equal to the higher of the Federal Funds rate in effect on that day plus 1.25% or the overnight LIBOR rate in effect on that day plus 1.25%. In addition, an annual commitment fee equal to 0.25% of the unused balance is allocated to each participating fund.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, there were no borrowings by the Portfolio under the agreement.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio  |  59


Notes to financial statements
8. INDEMNIFICATION
Under the Portfolio's organizational documents, the officers and Trustees have been granted certain indemnification rights against certain liabilities that may arise out of performance of their duties to the Portfolio. The Portfolio has entered into a separate agreement with each Trustee that converts indemnification rights currently existing under the Portfolio’s organizational documents into contractual rights that cannot be changed in the future without the consent of the Trustee. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Portfolio may enter into contracts with service providers that contain a variety of indemnification clauses. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent on future claims that may be made against the Portfolio and, therefore, cannot be estimated.
9. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
In August 2018, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 updates the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Management has adopted this guidance which did not have a material impact on the financial statements.
10. CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization announced that it had made the assessment that coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) is a pandemic. The impacts of COVID-19 are affecting the entire global economy, individual companies and investment products, the funds, and the market in general. There is significant uncertainty around the extent and duration of business disruptions related to COVID-19 and the impacts may last for an extended period of time. COVID-19 has led to significant uncertainty and volatility in the financial markets.
11. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
At a meeting held July 15, 2021, the Board of Trustees of the Wells Fargo Funds approved a change in the Portfolio's name to remove “Wells Fargo” from the Portfolio's name and replace with “Allspring”. The change is expected to go into effect on October 11, 2021.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) announced that it will be changing its company name to Allspring Global Investments upon the closing of the previously announced sale transaction of WFAM by Wells Fargo & Company to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. The new corporate name is expected to go into effect on the closing date of the transaction, which is anticipated to occur in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
Following the closing of the transaction, Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the Portfolio's investment adviser, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, each sub-advisers to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC will each be rebranded as Allspring.

60  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio


To the Interest Holders of the Portfolio and Board of Trustees
Wells Fargo Master Trust:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio (the Portfolio), one of the portfolios constituting Wells Fargo Master Trust, including the portfolio of investments, as of May 31, 2021, the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the financial statements) and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Portfolio as of May 31, 2021, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Portfolio in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and financial highlights, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. Such procedures also included confirmation of securities owned as of May 31, 2021, by correspondence with the custodian, transfer agent and brokers, or by other appropriate auditing procedures. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and financial highlights. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have not been able to determine the specific year that we began serving as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies; however, we are aware that we have served as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies since at least 1955.
Boston, Massachusetts
July 28, 2021

Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio  |  61


Other information (unaudited)
TAX INFORMATION
Pursuant to Section 852 of the Internal Revenue Code, $52,116,915 was designated as a 20% rate gain distribution for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021.
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, $68,750,227 has been designated as interest-related dividends for nonresident alien shareholders pursuant to Section 871 of the Internal Revenue Code.
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, $223,388,997 has been designated as short-term capital gain dividends for nonresident alien shareholders pursuant to Section 871 of the Internal Revenue Code.
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, 3% of the ordinary income distributed was derived from interest on U.S. government securities.
For corporate shareholders, pursuant to Section 163(j) of the Internal Revenue Code, 31% of ordinary income dividends qualify as interest dividends for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021.
PROXY VOTING INFORMATION
A description of the policies and procedures used to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-222-8222, visiting our website at wfam.com, or visiting the SEC website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the proxies related to portfolio securities were voted during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the website at wfam.com or by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS INFORMATION
The Fund and Portfolio file their complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year as an exhibit to their reports on Form N-PORT. Shareholders and Interest holders may view the filed Form N-PORT by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov.

62  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio


Other information (unaudited)
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS
Each of the Trustees and Officers listed in the table below acts in identical capacities for each fund in the Wells Fargo family of funds, which consists of 139 mutual funds comprising the Wells Fargo Funds Trust, Wells Fargo Variable Trust, Wells Fargo Master Trust and four closed-end funds (collectively the “Fund Complex”). This table should be read in conjunction with the Prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information1. The mailing address of each Trustee and Officer is 525 Market Street, 12th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105. Each Trustee and Officer serves an indefinite term, however, each Trustee serves such term until reaching the mandatory retirement age established by the Trustees.
Independent Trustees
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service*
Principal occupations during past five years or longer Current other
public company or
investment
company
directorships
William R. Ebsworth
(Born 1957)
Trustee,
since 2015
Retired. From 1984 to 2013, equities analyst, portfolio manager, research director and chief investment officer at Fidelity Management and Research Company in Boston, Tokyo, and Hong Kong, and retired in 2013 as Chief Investment Officer of Fidelity Strategic Advisers, Inc. where he led a team of investment professionals managing client assets. Prior thereto, Board member of Hong Kong Securities Clearing Co., Hong Kong Options Clearing Corp., the Thailand International Fund, Ltd., Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company, and Empire Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company. Audit Committee Chair and Investment Committee Chair of the Vincent Memorial Hospital Endowment (non-profit organization). Mr. Ebsworth is a CFA® charterholder. N/A
Jane A. Freeman
(Born 1953)
Trustee,
since 2015;
Chair Liaison,
since 2018
Retired. From 2012 to 2014 and 1999 to 2008, Chief Financial Officer of Scientific Learning Corporation. From 2008 to 2012, Ms. Freeman provided consulting services related to strategic business projects. Prior to 1999, Portfolio Manager at Rockefeller & Co. and Scudder, Stevens & Clark. Board member of the Harding Loevner Funds from 1996 to 2014, serving as both Lead Independent Director and chair of the Audit Committee. Board member of the Russell Exchange Traded Funds Trust from 2011 to 2012 and the chair of the Audit Committee. Ms. Freeman is also an inactive Chartered Financial Analyst. N/A
Isaiah Harris, Jr.
(Born 1952)
Trustee,
since 2009; Audit
Committee
Chair,
since 2019
Retired. Chairman of the Board of CIGNA Corporation since 2009, and Director since 2005. From 2003 to 2011, Director of Deluxe Corporation. Prior thereto, President and CEO of BellSouth Advertising and Publishing Corp. from 2005 to 2007, President and CEO of BellSouth Enterprises from 2004 to 2005 and President of BellSouth Consumer Services from 2000 to 2003. Emeritus member of the Iowa State University Foundation Board of Governors. Emeritus Member of the Advisory Board of Iowa State University School of Business. Advisory Board Member, Palm Harbor Academy (private school). Mr. Harris is a certified public accountant (inactive status). CIGNA Corporation
Judith M. Johnson
(Born 1949)
Trustee,
since 2008
Retired. Prior thereto, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund from 1996 to 2008. Ms. Johnson is an attorney, certified public accountant and a certified managerial accountant. N/A
David F. Larcker
(Born 1950)
Trustee,
since 2009
James Irvin Miller Professor of Accounting at the Graduate School of Business (Emeritus), Stanford University, Director of the Corporate Governance Research Initiative and Senior Faculty of The Rock Center for Corporate Governance since 2006. From 2005 to 2008, Professor of Accounting at the Graduate School of Business, Stanford University. Prior thereto, Ernst & Young Professor of Accounting at The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania from 1985 to 2005. N/A

Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio  |  63


Other information (unaudited)
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service*
Principal occupations during past five years or longer Current other
public company or
investment
company
directorships
Olivia S. Mitchell
(Born 1953)
Trustee,
since 2006;
Nominating and
Governance
Committee Chair,
since 2018
International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans Professor, Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania since 1993. Director of Wharton’s Pension Research Council and Boettner Center on Pensions & Retirement Research, and Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. Previously, Cornell University Professor from 1978 to 1993. N/A
Timothy J. Penny
(Born 1951)
Trustee,
since 1996;
Chair,
since 2018
President and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Minnesota Initiative Foundation, a non-profit organization, since 2007. Member of the Board of Trustees of NorthStar Education Finance, Inc., a non-profit organization, since 2007. N/A
James G. Polisson
(Born 1959)
Trustee,
since 2018
Retired. Chief Marketing Officer, Source (ETF) UK Services, Ltd, from 2015 to 2017. From 2012 to 2015, Principal of The Polisson Group, LLC, a management consulting, corporate advisory and principal investing company. Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director at Russell Investments, Global Exchange Traded Funds from 2010 to 2012. Managing Director of Barclays Global Investors from 1998 to 2010 and Global Chief Marketing Officer for iShares and Barclays Global Investors from 2000 to 2010. Trustee of the San Francisco Mechanics’ Institute, a non-profit organization, from 2013 to 2015. Board member of the Russell Exchange Traded Fund Trust from 2011 to 2012. Director of Barclays Global Investors Holdings Deutschland GmbH from 2006 to 2009. Mr. Polisson is an attorney and has a retired status with the Massachusetts and District of Columbia Bar Associations. N/A
Pamela Wheelock
(Born 1959)
Trustee,
since January
2020; previously
Trustee from
January 2018 to
July 2019
Board member of the Destination Medical Center Economic Development Agency, Rochester, Minnesota since 2019. Interim President of the McKnight Foundation from January to September 2020. Acting Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Human Services, July 2019 through September 2019. Human Services Manager (part-time), Minnesota Department of Human Services, October 2019 through December 2019. Chief Operating Officer, Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity from 2017 to 2019. Vice President of University Services, University of Minnesota from 2012 to 2016. Prior thereto, on the Board of Directors, Governance Committee and Finance Committee for the Minnesota Philanthropy Partners (Saint Paul Foundation) from 2012 to 2018, Interim Chief Executive Officer of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota from 2011 to 2012, Chairman of the Board from 2009 to 2012 and Board Director from 2003 to 2015. Vice President, Leadership and Community Engagement, Bush Foundation, Saint Paul, Minnesota (a private foundation) from 2009 to 2011. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Minnesota Sports and Entertainment from 2004 to 2009 and Senior Vice President from 2002 to 2004. Executive Vice President of the Minnesota Wild Foundation from 2004 to 2008. Commissioner of Finance, State of Minnesota, from 1999 to 2002. Currently Board Chair of the Minnesota Wild Foundation since 2010. N/A
*  Length of service dates reflect the Trustee’s commencement of service with the Trust’s predecessor entities, where applicable.

64  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio


Other information (unaudited)
Officers
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service
Principal occupations during past five years or longer
Andrew Owen
(Born 1960)
President,
since 2017
Executive Vice President of Wells Fargo & Company and Head of Affiliated Managers, Wells Fargo Asset Management, since 2014. In addition, Mr. Owen is currently President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC since 2017. Prior thereto, Executive Vice President responsible for marketing, investments and product development for Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, from 2009 to 2014.
Jeremy DePalma
(Born 1974)
Treasurer,
since 2012
(for certain funds in
the Fund Complex);
since 2021 (for
the remaining funds in the
Fund Complex)
Senior Vice President of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC since 2009. Senior Vice President of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC from 2008 to 2010 and head of the Fund Reporting and Control Team within Fund Administration from 2005 to 2010.
Michelle Rhee
(Born 1966)
Chief Legal Officer,
since 2019
Secretary of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC and Chief Legal Counsel of Wells Fargo Asset Management since 2018. Deputy General Counsel of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. since 2020 and Assistant General Counsel of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. from 2018 to 2020. Associate General Counsel and Managing Director of Bank of America Corporation from 2004 to 2018.
Catherine Kennedy
(Born 1969)
Secretary,
since 2019
Vice President of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC and Senior Counsel of the Wells Fargo Legal Department since 2010. Vice President and Senior Counsel of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC from 1998 to 2010.
Michael H. Whitaker
(Born 1967)
Chief Compliance Officer,
since 2016
Chief Compliance Officer of Wells Fargo Asset Management since 2016. Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer for Fidelity Investments from 2007 to 2016.
1  The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about the Trustees and is available, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-222-8222 or by visiting the website at wfam.com.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio  |  65


Other information (unaudited)
LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
In accordance with Rule 22e-4 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Liquidity Rule”), Wells Fargo Funds Trust and Wells Fargo Master Trust (each a “Trust”) has adopted and implemented a liquidity risk management program (the “Program”) on behalf of each of its series, including the Fund and the Portfolio, which is reasonably designed to assess and manage the Fund’s or the Portfolio’s liquidity risk. “Liquidity risk” is defined under the Liquidity Rule as the risk that the Fund or Portfolio is unable to meet redemption requests without significantly diluting remaining investors’ interests in the Fund or Portfolio. Each Trust’s Board of Trustees (each a “Board”) previously approved the designation of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”), the Fund’s investment manager and the Portfolio’s investment adviser, as the administrator of the Program, and Funds Management has established a Liquidity Risk Management Council (the “Council”) composed of personnel from multiple departments within Funds Management and its affiliates to assist Funds Management in the implementation and on-going administration of the Program.
The Program is comprised of various components designed to support the assessment and/or management of liquidity risk, including: (1) the periodic assessment (no less frequently than annually) of certain factors that influence the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s liquidity risk; (2) the periodic classification (no less frequently than monthly) of the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s investments into one of four liquidity categories that reflect an estimate of their liquidity under current market conditions; (3) a 15% limit on the acquisition of “illiquid investments” (as defined under the Liquidity Rule); (4) to the extent the Fund or the Portfolio does not invest primarily in “highly liquid investments” (as defined under the Liquidity Rule), the determination of a minimum percentage of the Fund’s or the Portfolio’s assets that generally will be invested in highly liquid investments (an “HLIM”); (5) if the Fund or the Portfolio has established an HLIM, the periodic review (no less frequently than annually) of the HLIM and the adoption of policies and procedures for responding to a shortfall of the Fund’s or the Portfolio’s “highly liquid investments” below its HLIM; and (6) periodic reporting to the Board.
At a meeting of the Board held on May 17-19, 2021, the Board received and reviewed a written report (the “Report”) from Funds Management that addressed the operation of the Program and assessed its adequacy and effectiveness for the period from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 (the “Reporting Period”). Among other things, the Report discussed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on liquidity and management of liquidity risk during the Reporting Period, including during the stressed market conditions caused by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. No significant liquidity events impacting the Fund or the Portfolio were noted in the Report. As applicable to the Fund and the Portfolio, there were no material changes to the Program during the Reporting Period.
Funds Management concluded in the Report that the Program is operating effectively to assess and manage the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s liquidity risk, and that the Program has been and continues to be adequately and effectively implemented to monitor and, as applicable, respond to the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s liquidity developments.
There can be no assurance that the Program will achieve its objectives under all circumstances in the future. Please refer to the Fund’s prospectus for more information regarding the Fund’s exposure to liquidity risk and other risks to which an investment in the Fund may be subject.

66  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio


Board considerations (unaudited)
BOARD CONSIDERATION OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, ADVISORY AND SUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENTS:
Board Considerations – Current Agreements
Under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Board of Trustees (each, a “Board” and collectively, the “Boards”) of each of Wells Fargo Funds Trust (“Funds Trust”) and Wells Fargo Master Trust (“Master Trust”, and collectively, the “Trusts”) must determine annually whether to approve the continuation of the Trusts’ investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements, as applicable. In this regard, at a Board meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Meeting”), the Funds Trust Board, all the members of which have no direct or indirect interest in the investment management agreement and are not “interested persons” of the Trusts, as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), reviewed and approved for Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund (the “Gateway Fund”) an investment management agreement (the “Gateway Fund Management Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”).
At the Meeting, the Master Trust Board, all the members of which have no direct or indirect interest in the investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements and are Independent Trustees, reviewed and approved: (i) an investment advisory agreement (the “Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement”) with Funds Management for Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio, a portfolio of Master Trust (the “Master Portfolio”); and (ii) an investment sub-advisory agreement (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Wells Capital Management Incorporated (the “Sub-Adviser”), an affiliate of Funds Management, for the Master Portfolio.
The Gateway Fund and the Master Portfolio are collectively referred to as the “Funds.” The Gateway Fund Management Agreement, the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement are collectively referred to as the “Advisory Agreements.”
The Gateway Fund is a gateway feeder fund that invest substantially all of its assets in the Master Portfolio. The Master Portfolio has a substantially similar investment objective and substantially similar investment strategies to the Gateway Fund. Information provided to the Boards regarding the Gateway Fund is also applicable to the Master Portfolio, as relevant.
The Boards noted that Wells Fargo & Company recently announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”), which includes Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser, to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. and/or their affiliates (the “Transaction”). The Boards further noted that the Transaction would result in a change-of-control of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser, which would be considered to be an assignment that would result in the termination of the Advisory Agreements. In light of the Transaction, each Board separately considered for approval a new investment management agreement with Funds Management and, with respect to the Master Portfolio, the Master Trust Board considered for approval a new sub-advisory agreement with the Sub-Adviser (collectively, the “New Agreements”) that would replace the Advisory Agreements upon consummation of the Transaction, subject to approval of each respective New Agreement by each Fund’s shareholders. The Boards also considered for approval interim agreements to go into effect in the event shareholders do not approve the New Agreements before the Transaction is completed. The interim agreements would allow the Manager and the Sub-Adviser, as applicable, to continue providing services to the Funds while the Funds continue to seek shareholder approval of the New Agreements. The Boards noted that the terms of the interim agreements would be identical to those of the current Advisory Agreements, except for the term and certain escrow provisions.
At the Meeting, the Boards considered the factors and reached the conclusions described below relating to the selection of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser and the approval of the Advisory Agreements. Prior to the Meeting, including at Board meetings held in April and May 2021, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with representatives of Funds Management about these matters. Also, the Boards have adopted a team-based approach, with each team consisting of a sub-set of Trustees, to assist the full Boards in the discharge of their duties in reviewing investment performance and other matters throughout the year. The Independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Advisory Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately.
In providing information to the Boards, Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser were guided by a detailed set of requests for information submitted to them by independent legal counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees at the start of the Boards’ annual contract renewal process earlier in 2021. In considering and approving the Advisory Agreements, the Trustees considered the information they believed relevant, including but not limited to the information discussed below. The Boards considered not only the specific information presented in connection with the Meeting, but also the knowledge gained over time through interaction with Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser about various topics. In this regard, the Boards reviewed reports of Funds Management at each of their quarterly meetings, which included, among other things, portfolio reviews and investment performance reports. In addition, the Boards and the teams mentioned above confer with portfolio managers at various times throughout the year. The Boards did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each individual Trustee may have attributed different weights to various factors.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund  |  67


Board considerations (unaudited)
After its deliberations, the Funds Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Gateway Fund Management Agreement for a one-year term. Additionally, after its deliberations, the Master Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement, each for a one-year term. The Boards considered the approval of the Advisory Agreements for the Funds as part of their consideration of agreements for funds across the complex, but their approvals were made on a fund-by-fund basis. The following summarizes a number of important, but not necessarily all, factors considered by the Boards in support of their approvals.
Nature, extent and quality of services
The Boards received and considered various information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser under the Advisory Agreements. This information included a description of the investment advisory services and Fund-level administrative services, as well as, among other things, a summary of the background and experience of senior management of WFAM, of which Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser are a part, and a summary of investments made in the business of WFAM. The Boards also received a description of Funds Management’s and the Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans, including a summary of the performance of such plans and any changes thereto during the COVID-19 pandemic, and of their approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity. The Boards also received and reviewed information about Funds Management’s role as administrator of the Funds’ liquidity risk management program, Funds Management’s approach to risk management, and Funds Management’s intermediary and vendor oversight program.
The Boards also considered the qualifications, background, tenure and responsibilities of each of the portfolio managers primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the Funds. The Boards evaluated the ability of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser to attract and retain qualified investment professionals, including research, advisory and supervisory personnel.
The Boards further considered the compliance programs and compliance records of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser. In addition, the Boards took into account the full range of services provided to the Funds by Funds Management and its affiliates. The Boards also considered information about retention and back-up arrangements that have been put into place with respect to key personnel of WFAM in connection with the anticipated Transaction, noting that WFAM provided assurances that the announcement and eventual culmination of the Transaction is not expected to result in any diminution in the nature or quality of services provided to the Funds.
Fund investment performance and expenses
The Boards considered the investment performance results for each of the Funds over various time periods ended December 31, 2020. The Boards considered these results in comparison to the investment performance of funds in a universe that was determined by Broadridge Inc. (“Broadridge”) to be similar to the Gateway Fund (the “Universe”), and in comparison to the Gateway Fund’s benchmark index and to other comparative data. Broadridge is an independent provider of investment company data. The Boards received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the performance Universe. The Funds Trust Board noted that the investment performance of the Gateway Fund (Administrator Class) was higher than or in range of the average investment performance of its Universe for the one-, three- and ten-year periods ended December 31, 2020, and lower than the average investment performance of its Universe for the five-year period ended December 31, 2020. The Funds Trust Board also noted that the investment performance of the Gateway Fund was higher than or in range of its benchmark index, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, for all periods ended December 31, 2020.
The Master Trust Board took note of the investment performance of the Master Portfolio in the context of reviewing the investment performance of the Gateway Fund.
The Funds Trust Board also received and considered information regarding the Gateway Fund’s net operating expense ratios, which include fees and expenses of the Master Portfolio, and their various components, including actual management fees assessed at the Gateway Fund and Master Portfolio levels, custodian and other non-management fees, and Rule 12b-1 and non-Rule 12b-1 shareholder service fees. The Funds Trust Board considered these ratios in comparison to the median ratios of funds in class-specific expense groups that were determined by Broadridge to be similar to the Gateway Fund (the “Groups”). The Funds Trust Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the expense Groups and an explanation of how funds comprising expense groups and their expense ratios may vary from year-to-year. Based on the Broadridge reports, the Funds Trust Board noted that the net operating expense ratios of the Gateway Fund were lower than, in range of or equal to the median net operating expense ratios of its expense Groups for each share class.
With respect to the Master Portfolio, the Master Trust Board reviewed the fee rates that are payable to Funds Management for investment advisory services (as discussed below), which are the only fees charged at the Master Portfolio level, relative to a corresponding expense Group.

68  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
The Boards took into account the Funds’ investment performance and expense information provided to them among the factors considered in deciding to re-approve the Advisory Agreements.
Investment management, advisory and sub-advisory fee rates
The Funds Trust Board noted that Funds Management receives no advisory fees from the Gateway Fund as long as the Gateway Fund continues to invest all (or substantially all) of its assets in a single master portfolio. If the Gateway Fund were to change its investment structure so that it began investing in two or more master portfolios (a fund-of-funds), Funds Management would be entitled to receive an annual fee of 0.25% of the Gateway Fund’s average daily net assets for providing investment advisory services to the Gateway Fund, including allocating the Gateway Fund’s assets to the Master Portfolio.
The Funds Trust Board reviewed and considered the contractual fee rates that are payable by the Gateway Fund to Funds Management under the Gateway Fund Management Agreement for management services (other than investment advisory services), as well as the contractual fee rates payable by the Gateway Fund to Funds Management for class-level administrative services under a Class-Level Administration Agreement, which include, among other things, class-level transfer agency and sub-transfer agency costs (collectively, the “Management Rates”).
The Master Trust Board reviewed and considered the contractual investment advisory fee rate that is payable by the Master Portfolio to Funds Management for investment advisory services under the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement (the “Advisory Agreement Rate”). The Master Trust Board also reviewed and considered the contractual investment sub-advisory fee rate that is payable by Funds Management to the Sub-Adviser for investment sub-advisory services (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement Rate”).
Among other information reviewed by the Funds Trust Board was a comparison of the Gateway Fund’s Management Rate, which, for this purpose, includes the advisory fees paid at the Master Portfolio level, with the average contractual investment management fee rates of funds in the expense Groups at a common asset level as well as transfer agency costs of the funds in the expense Groups. The Funds Trust Board noted that the Management Rates of the Gateway Fund were in range of the sum of these average rates for the Gateway Fund’s expense Groups for each share class.
The Master Trust Board reviewed a comparison of the Advisory Agreement Rate of the Master Portfolio with those of other funds in the Master Portfolio’s expense Group at a common asset level. The Master Trust Board noted that the Advisory Agreement Rate of the Master Portfolio was in range of the median rate for the Master Portfolio’s expense Group.
The Master Trust Board also received and considered information about the portions of the total management fees that were retained by Funds Management after payment of the fees to the Sub-Adviser for sub-advisory services. In assessing the reasonableness of these amounts, the Master Trust Board received and evaluated information about the nature and extent of responsibilities retained and risks assumed by Funds Management and not delegated to or assumed by the Sub-Adviser, and about Funds Management’s on-going oversight services. Given the affiliation between Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser, the Master Trust Board ascribed limited relevance to the allocation of fees between them.
The Boards also received and considered information about the nature and extent of services offered and fee rates charged by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser to other types of clients with investment strategies similar to those of the Funds. In this regard, the Boards received information about the significantly greater scope of services, and compliance, reporting and other legal burdens and risks of managing proprietary mutual funds compared with those associated with managing assets of other types of clients, including third-party sub-advised fund clients and non-mutual fund clients such as institutional separate accounts.
Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Funds Trust Board determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the Gateway Fund Management Agreement was reasonable, and the Master Trust Board determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and to the Sub-Adviser under the Sub-Advisory Agreement was reasonable.
Profitability
The Boards received and considered information concerning the profitability of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo & Co. (“Wells Fargo”) from providing services to the fund family as a whole. The Boards noted that the Sub-Adviser’s profitability information with respect to providing services to the Master Portfolio and other funds in the family was subsumed in the WFAM and Wells Fargo profitability analysis.
Funds Management reported on the methodologies and estimates used in calculating profitability, including a description of the methodology used to allocate certain expenses. Among other things, the Boards noted that the levels of profitability reported on a fund-by-fund basis varied widely, depending on factors such as the size, type and age of fund. Based on its review, the Boards did

Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund  |  69


Board considerations (unaudited)
not deem the profits reported by Funds Management, WFAM or Wells Fargo from services provided to the Funds to be at a level that would prevent the Boards from approving the continuation of the Advisory Agreements.
Economies of scale
The Boards received and considered information about the potential for Funds Management to experience economies of scale in the provision of management services to the Funds, the difficulties of calculating economies of scale at an individual fund level, and the extent to which potential scale benefits are shared with shareholders of the Funds. The Boards noted the existence of breakpoints in the Master Portfolio’s advisory fee structure and the Gateway Fund’s management fee structure, which operate generally to reduce the Funds’ expense ratios as the Funds grow in size, and the size of the Master Portfolio and the Gateway Fund, respectively, in relation to such breakpoints. The Boards considered that, in addition to advisory fee and management fee breakpoints, Funds Management shares potential economies of scale from its management business in a variety of ways, including through fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangements, competitive management fee rates set at the outset without regard to breakpoints, and investments in the business intended to enhance services available to shareholders.
The Boards concluded that Funds Management’s arrangements with respect to each Fund, including contractual breakpoints, constituted a reasonable approach to sharing potential economies of scale with the Funds and their shareholders.
Other benefits to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser
The Boards received and considered information regarding potential “fall-out” or ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including the Sub-Adviser, as a result of their relationships with the Funds. Ancillary benefits could include, among others, benefits directly attributable to other relationships with the Funds and benefits potentially derived from an increase in Funds Management’s and the Sub-Adviser’s business as a result of their relationships with the Funds. The Boards noted that various affiliates of Funds Management may receive distribution-related fees, shareholder servicing payments and sub-transfer agency fees in respect of shares sold or held through them and services provided.
The Boards also reviewed information about soft dollar credits earned and utilized by the Sub-Adviser, fees earned by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser from managing a private investment vehicle for the fund family’s securities lending collateral, and commissions earned by an affiliated broker from portfolio transactions.
Based on their consideration of the factors and information they deemed relevant, including those described here, the Boards did not find that any ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including the Sub-Adviser, were unreasonable.
Conclusion
At the Meeting, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Funds Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Gateway Fund Management Agreement for a one-year term. Additionally, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Master Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement, each for a one-year term.

70  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board Considerations - New Agreements
Overview of the Board evaluation process
At a meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Board Meeting”), the Board of Trustees of Wells Fargo Funds Trust (“Funds Trust”, and the series identified below, the “Funds”) approved the continuation of each Fund’s current Investment Management Agreement (the “Current Investment Management Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”) and the Board of Trustees of Wells Fargo Master Trust (“Master Trust”, and the series identified below in which each Fund invests substantially all of its assets, a “Master Portfolio”) approved the continuation of the current investment advisory agreement (the “Current Advisory Agreement”) with Funds Management, the current sub-advisory agreement with Wells Capital Management Incorporated (“Wells Capital”, and together with Funds Management, the “Advisers”), and the current sub-advisory agreements with Cooke & Bieler, L.P. (“C&B”) and Peregrine Capital Management, LLC (“Peregrine”, and together with C&B, the “Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers”)(collectively, the “Current Agreements”).
Funds Trust Master Trust
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio
Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio
Wells Fargo Index Fund Wells Fargo Index Portfolio
Wells Fargo Real Return Fund Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio
Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio
Each Trustee on the Funds Trust Board and the Master Trust Board of Trustees (collectively, the “Boards”) is not an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) of the Funds or the Master Portfolios (collectively, the “Independent Trustees”). The process followed by the Boards in considering and approving the continuation of each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s Current Agreements is referred to herein as the “2021 Annual Approval Process.”
As noted above, the closing of the sale of Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”) to a holding company (“NewCo”) affiliated with private funds of GTCR LLC (“GTCR”) and of Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. (“Reverence Capital”, and such transaction, the “Transaction”) will result in a change of control of Funds Management and Wells Capital, which will be considered to be an “assignment” of each Fund’s Current Agreements under the 1940 Act that will result in the automatic termination of each Fund’s Current Agreements. In light of the expected termination of each Fund’s Current Agreements upon the closing, at the Board Meeting the Boards also approved, as applicable: (i) for Funds Trust, a new investment management agreement with Funds Management (the “New Investment Management Agreement”); (ii) for the Master Trust, a new advisory agreement with Funds Management (the “New Advisory Agreement”); (iii) for Master Trust, a new sub-advisory agreement (the “New WellsCap Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Wells Capital for Emerging Growth Portfolio, Index Portfolio, Small Company Value Portfolio, Core Bond Portfolio and Real Return Portfolio; (iv) for Master Trust, a new sub-advisory agreement (the “New Peregrine Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Peregrine for Small Company Growth Portfolio; and (v) for Master Trust, a new sub-advisory agreement (the “New C&B Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with C&B for the C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio, each of which is intended to go into effect upon the closing (the “New Agreements”). The process followed by the Boards in reviewing and approving the New Agreements is referred to herein as the “New Agreement Approval Process.”
At a series of meetings held in April and May 2021 (collectively, “April and May 2021 Meetings”) and at the Board Meeting, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital about the New Agreements and related matters. The Boards reviewed and discussed information furnished by Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital that the Boards considered reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the New Agreements and the services to be provided. At these meetings, senior representatives from Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital made presentations to, and responded to questions from, the Boards.
In providing information to the Boards in connection with the 2021 annual approval process for the Current Agreements (the “2021 Annual Approval Process”) and the New Agreement Approval Process, Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital (as applicable) were guided by requests for information submitted by independent legal counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. In considering and approving the New Agreements, the Trustees considered the information they believed relevant, including but not limited to the information discussed herein. The Boards considered not only the specific information presented in connection with the April and May 2021 Meetings as well as the Board Meeting, but also the knowledge gained over time through interaction with Funds Management, as well as with Wells Capital and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers (collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”), about various topics. In this regard, the Boards review reports of Funds Management at each of their regular

Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund  |  71


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board meetings, which includes, among other things, portfolio reviews and investment performance reports. In addition, the Boards confer with portfolio managers at various times throughout the year. The Boards were assisted in their evaluation of the New Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom the Independent Trustees received separate legal advice and with whom the Independent Trustees met separately. The Boards did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each individual Trustee may have attributed different weights to various factors.
Among other information considered by the Boards in connection with the Transaction was:
■  Information regarding the Transaction: information about the structure, financing sources and material terms and conditions of the Transaction, including the expected impact on the businesses conducted by the Advisers and by Wells Fargo Funds Distributor LLC, as the distributor of Fund shares.
■  Information regarding NewCo, GTCR and Reverence Capital: (i) information about NewCo, including information about its expected financial condition and access to capital, and senior leadership team; (ii) the experience of senior management at GTCR and Reverence Capital in acquiring portfolio companies; (iii) the plan to operationalize NewCo, including the transition of necessary infrastructure services through a transition services agreement with Wells Fargo under which Wells Fargo will continue to provide NewCo with certain services for a specified period of time after the closing; and (iv) information regarding regulatory matters, compliance, and risk management functions at NewCo, including resources to be dedicated thereto.
■  Impact of the Transaction on WFAM and Service Providers: (i) information regarding any changes to personnel and/or other resources of the Advisers as a result of the Transaction, including assurances regarding comparable and competitive compensation arrangements to attract and retain highly qualified personnel; and (ii) information about the organizational and operating structure with respect to NewCo, the Advisers and the Funds and Master Portfolios.
■  Impact of the Transaction on the Funds and their Shareholders and the Master Portfolios and their Interest Holders: (i) information regarding anticipated benefits to the Funds and the Master Portfolios as a result of the Transaction; (ii) a commitment that the Funds and Master Portfolios would not bear any expenses, directly or indirectly, in connection with the Transaction; (iii) confirmation that the Advisers and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers intend to continue to manage the Funds in a manner consistent with each Fund’s or Master Portfolio’s current investment objectives and principal investments strategies, as applicable; and (iv) a commitment that neither NewCo nor WFAM will take any steps that would impose any “unfair burden” (as that term is used in section 15(f)(1)(B) of the 1940 Act) on the Funds or the Master Portfolios as a result of the Transaction.
With respect to the New Agreements, the Boards considered: (i) a representation that, after the closing, all of the Funds and Master Portfolios will continue to be managed and advised by their current Advisers and Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, as applicable, and that the same portfolio managers are expected to continue to manage the Funds or Master Portfolios, as applicable, after the Transaction; (ii) information regarding the terms of the New Agreements, including changes as compared to the Current Agreements; (iii) information confirming that the fee rates payable under the New Agreements will not increase as a result of the Transaction as compared to the rates under the Current Agreements; and (iv) assurances that the Transaction is not expected to cause any diminution with respect to the nature, extent and quality of any of the services currently provided to the Funds or the Master Portfolios by the Advisers and Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers as a result of the Transaction.
In addition to considering information furnished specifically to evaluate the impact of the Transaction on the Funds and their respective shareholders and the Master Portfolios and their interest holders in connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards considered information furnished at prior meetings of the Boards and their committees, including detailed information provided in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process. In this regard, in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received information about complex-wide and individual Fund and Master Portfolio performance, fees and expenses, including: (i) a report from an independent data provider comparing the investment performance of each Fund or Master Portfolio to the investment performance of comparable funds and benchmark indices, over various time periods; (ii) a report from an independent data provider comparing each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s total expense ratio (and its components) to those of comparable funds; (iii) comparative information concerning the fees charged and services provided by the Advisers and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, to each Fund or Master Portfolio in managing other accounts (which may include other mutual funds, collective investment funds and institutional accounts), if any, that employ investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing such Fund(s) or Master Portfolio(s) as applicable; and (iv) profitability analyses of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo from providing services to the fund family as a whole.
After its deliberations, the Boards unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the respective New Agreements is reasonable, approved the respective New Agreements for a two-year term, and

72  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
voted to recommend that Fund shareholders approve the New Agreements. The Boards considered the approval of the New Agreements as part of their consideration of agreements for funds and master portfolios across the complex, but their approvals were made on a fund-by-fund basis. The following summarizes a number of important, but not necessarily all, factors considered by the Boards in support of their approvals.
Nature, extent and quality of services
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered various information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds and Master Portfolios by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the Current Agreements. This information included a description of the investment advisory services and Fund-level administrative services covered by the Current Agreements, as well as, among other things, a summary of the background and experience of senior management of WFAM, of which Funds Management and Wells Capital are a part, and a summary of investments made in the business of WFAM. The Boards also received a description of Funds Management’s and Wells Capital’s business continuity plans, including a summary of the performance of such plans and any changes thereto during the COVID-19 pandemic, and of their approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity. The Boards also received and reviewed information about Funds Management’s role as administrator of the Funds’ and Master Portfolios’ liquidity risk management program, Funds Management’s approach to risk management, and Funds Management’s intermediary and vendor oversight program.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also considered the qualifications, background, tenure and responsibilities of each of the portfolio managers primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the Funds and the Master Portfolios. The Boards evaluated the ability of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to attract and retain qualified investment professionals, including research, advisory and supervisory personnel.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards further considered the compliance programs and compliance records of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers. In addition, the Boards took into account the full range of services provided to the Funds by Funds Management and its affiliates.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards considered, among other information, the structure of the Transaction and expected impact, if any, of the Transaction on the operations, facilities, organization and personnel of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers. The Boards received assurances from Funds Management that each Fund and Master Portfolio will continue to be advised by its current Sub-Advisers after the closing, and that the same individual portfolio managers are expected to continue to manage the Funds and Master Portfolios, respectively, after the closing. With respect to the recruitment and retention of key personnel, the Boards noted information from GTCR, Reverence Capital and the Advisers regarding the potential benefits for employees of joining NewCo. The Boards recognized that the personnel of the Advisers who had been extended offers may not accept such offers, and personnel changes at the Advisers or the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers may occur in the future in the ordinary course.
In addition, the Boards considered information regarding the infrastructure, operational capabilities and support staff in place to assist in the portfolio management and operations of the Funds and Master Portfolios, as applicable, including the provision of administrative services, and the anticipated impact of the Transaction on such matters. The Boards also considered the business-related and other risks to which the Advisers and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers may be subject in managing the Funds and Master Portfolios, as applicable, and in connection with the Transaction. The Boards also considered the transition and integration plans as a result of the change in ownership of the Advisers from Wells Fargo to NewCo. The Boards considered the resources and infrastructure that NewCo intends to devote to its compliance program to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations, as well as its risk management program and cybersecurity program. The Boards also took into account assurances received from the Advisers, GTCR and Reverence Capital that the Transaction is not expected to cause any diminution in the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Advisers or the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers to the Funds and their shareholders or to the Master Portfolios and their interest holders, as applicable.
Fund investment performance and expenses
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards considered the investment performance results for each Fund over various time periods ended December 31, 2020. The Boards considered these results in comparison to the investment performance of funds in a universe that was determined by Broadridge Inc. (“Broadridge”) to be similar to each Fund (the “Universe”), and in comparison to each Fund’s benchmark index and to other comparative data. Broadridge is an independent provider of investment company data. The Boards received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the performance Universe. Where applicable, the Boards received information concerning, and discussed factors contributing to, underperformance of Funds relative to the Universe and benchmark for any underperformance periods.
The Master Trust Board of Trustees took note of the investment performance of the Master Portfolios in the context of reviewing the investment performance of the Funds.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund  |  73


Board considerations (unaudited)
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also received and considered information regarding each Fund’s and Portfolio’s net operating expense ratios and their various components, including actual management fees, custodian and other non-management fees, and Rule 12b-1 and non-Rule 12b-1 shareholder service fees. The Boards considered these ratios in comparison to the median ratios of funds in class-specific expense groups that were determined by Broadridge to be similar to each Fund (the “Groups”). The Boards received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the expense Groups and an explanation of how funds comprising expense groups and their expense ratios may vary from year-to-year.
With respect to the Master Portfolios, the Master Trust Board of Trustees reviewed the fee rates that are payable to Funds Management for investment advisory services, which are the only fees charged at the Master Portfolio level, relative to a corresponding expense Group.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards received a commitment that WFAM will maintain fee and expense commitments for at least two years after the closing. The Boards took into account each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s investment performance and expense information among the factors considered in deciding to approve the New Agreements.
Investment management, advisory and sub-advisory fee rates
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board of Trustees of the Trust noted that Funds Management receives no advisory fees from a Fund as long as the Fund continues to invest all (or substantially all) of its assets in a single master portfolio. If a Fund were to change its investment structure so that it began investing in two or more master portfolios (a fund-of-funds), Funds Management would be entitled to receive an annual fee of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets for providing investment advisory services to the Fund, including allocating the Fund’s assets among the Master Portfolios.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board of Trustees of the Trust reviewed and considered the contractual fee rates that are payable by each Fund to Funds Management under the Fund’s Management Agreement for management services (other than investment advisory services), as well as the contractual fee rates payable by the Fund to Funds Management for class-level administrative services under a Class-Level Administration Agreement, which include, among other things, class-level transfer agency and subtransfer agency costs (collectively, the “Management Rates”). The Master Trust Board of Trustees reviewed and considered the contractual investment advisory fee rate that is payable by each Master Portfolio to Funds Management for investment advisory services under the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement (the “Advisory Agreement Rate”). The Master Trust Board of Trustees also reviewed and considered the contractual investment sub-advisory fee rates that are payable by Funds Management to the Sub-Advisers for investment sub-advisory services (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement Rates”).
Among other information reviewed by the Boards in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, was a comparison of each Fund’s Management Rates which, for this purpose, includes the advisory fees paid at the Master Portfolio level, with the average contractual investment management fee rates of funds in the expense Groups at a common asset level as well as transfer agency costs of the funds in the expense Groups.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also received and considered information about the nature and extent of services offered and fee rates charged by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to other types of clients, if any, with investment strategies similar to those of each Fund. In this regard, the Boards received information about the significantly greater scope of services, and compliance, reporting and other legal burdens and risks of managing proprietary mutual funds compared with those associated with managing assets of other types of clients, including third-party sub-advised fund clients and non-mutual fund clients such as institutional separate accounts.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards noted the assurances received by it that there would be no increases to any of the Management Rates, the Advisory Agreement Rates or the Sub-Advisory Agreement Rates as a result of the Transaction. The Boards also considered that the New Agreements do not change the computation method for calculating such fees, and there is no present intention to reduce expense waiver and reimbursement arrangements that are currently in effect. Based on their consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Boards determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the New Management Agreement and the New Advisory Agreement and payable to the Sub-Advisers under the New Sub-Advisory Agreements was reasonable.
Profitability
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered information concerning the profitability of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo from providing services to the fund family as a whole. The Boards noted that Wells Capital’s profitability information with respect to providing services to each Fund

74  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
and other funds in the family was subsumed in the WFAM and Wells Fargo profitability analysis. The Boards did not consider profitability with respect to the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, as the sub-advisory fees paid to the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers had been negotiated by Funds Management on an arm’s-length basis.
Funds Management reported on the methodologies and estimates used in calculating profitability in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, including a description of the methodology used to allocate certain expenses. Among other things, the Boards noted that the levels of profitability reported on a fund-by-fund basis varied widely, depending on factors such as the size, type and age of fund.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards received certain information about NewCo’s projected financial condition, and reviewed with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital the underlying assumptions on which such information was based. The Boards considered that NewCo is a newly formed entity, with no historical operations, revenues or expenses, and that it is difficult to predict with any degree of certainty the future profitability of NewCo and the Advisers from advisory activities under the New Agreements. The Boards considered that the fee rates payable under the New Agreements will not increase as a result of the Transaction as compared to the rates under the Current Agreements, and that the current contractual expense limitations applicable to each Fund will not increase. The Boards noted that if the New Agreements are approved by shareholders and the Transaction closes, the Boards will have the opportunity in the future to review the profitability of NewCo and the Advisers from advisory activities under the New Agreements with the Advisers.
Economies of scale
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered information about the potential for Funds Management to experience economies of scale in the provision of management services to the Funds and the Master Portfolios, the difficulties of calculating economies of scale at an individual fund level, and the extent to which potential scale benefits are shared with Fund shareholders. The Boards noted the existence of breakpoints in each Fund’s management fee structure and each Master Portfolio’s advisory fee structure, which operate generally to reduce each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s and expense ratios as they grows in size, and the size of each Fund and Master Portfolio and in relation to such breakpoints. The Boards considered that, in addition to advisory fee and management fee and advisory fee breakpoints, Funds Management shares potential economies of scale from its management business in a variety of ways, including through fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangements, competitive management fee rates set at the outset without regard to breakpoints, and investments in the business intended to enhance services available to shareholders.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards noted that NewCo and the Advisers may benefit from possible growth of the Funds and Master Portfolios resulting from enhanced distribution capabilities. However, the Boards noted that other factors could also affect the potential for economies of scale, and that it was not possible to quantify any potential future economies of scale. Based upon the information furnished to the Boards in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process and the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards concluded that Funds Management’s arrangements with respect to each Fund and Master Portfolio, including contractual breakpoints and expense limitation arrangements, constitute a reasonable approach to sharing potential economies of scale with the Fund and its shareholders and the Master Portfolio and its interest holders.
“Fall-out” benefits to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered information regarding potential “fall-out” or ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including Wells Capital, and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers as a result of their relationships with the Funds and the Master Portfolios, as applicable. Ancillary benefits could include, among others, benefits directly attributable to other relationships with the Funds and Master Portfolios and benefits potentially derived from an increase in Funds Management’s and the Wells Capital’s business as a result of their relationships with the Funds and the Master Portfolios. The Boards noted that various current affiliates of Funds Management may receive distribution-related fees, shareholder servicing payments and sub-transfer agency fees in respect of shares sold or held through them and services provided.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also reviewed information about any soft dollar credits earned and utilized by the Sub-Advisers, fees earned by Funds Management and Wells Capital from managing a private investment vehicle for the fund family’s securities lending collateral, and commissions earned by an affiliated broker of Wells Fargo from portfolio transactions.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards received information to the effect that the Transaction is not expected to have a material impact on the fall-out benefits currently realized by Funds Management and its affiliates, including Wells Capital, and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers. The information reviewed by the Boards also noted that several of the ancillary benefits identified for WFAM would be potential ancillary benefits for NewCo, including that the scale and reputation of

Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund  |  75


Board considerations (unaudited)
the Funds and Master Portfolios might benefit NewCo’s broader reputation, product initiatives, technology investment and talent acquisition. Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Boards did not find that any ancillary benefits expected to be received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including NewCo and Wells Capital and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, under the New Agreements were unreasonable.
Conclusion
At the Board Meeting, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Boards unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the New Agreements is reasonable, approved the New Agreements for a two-year term, and voted to recommend that Fund shareholders approve the New Agreements.

76  |  Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board Considerations - Interim Agreements
At a meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Board Meeting”), the Boards of Trustees (each, a “Board”, and collectively, the “Boards”) of Wells Fargo Funds Trust, Wells Fargo Master Trust, Wells Fargo Variable Trust, Wells Fargo Global Dividend Opportunity Fund, Wells Fargo Income Opportunities Fund, Wells Fargo Multi-Sector Income Fund and Wells Fargo Utilities and High Income Fund (each a “Trust”, and the series thereof, a “Fund”) reviewed and approved for the Trusts and Funds, as applicable: (i) interim investment management agreements (the “Interim Management Agreements”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”); (ii) interim investment advisory agreements (the “Interim Advisory Agreements”) with Funds Management; and (iii) interim sub-advisory agreements (the “Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements”) with each of Cooke & Bieler, L.P., Galliard Capital Management LLC (“Galliard”), Peregrine Capital Management Inc., Wells Capital Management LLC (“WellsCap”), and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited (“WFAMI”, and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”). Each Trustee on the Board is not an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) of the Funds (collectively, the “Independent Trustees”). The Interim Management Agreements, Interim Advisory Agreements, and Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements are collectively referred to as the “Interim Advisory Agreements.”
At the Board Meeting, the Boards reviewed and approved the continuation of existing investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements (the “Current Advisory Agreements”) for each Trust and Fund, as applicable. The factors considered and conclusions reached by the Boards in approving the Current Advisory Agreements are summarized in the section entitled “Board Considerations – Current Agreements” of this shareholder report. The Boards noted that Wells Fargo & Company has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”), which includes Funds Management, Galliard, WellsCap and WFAMI (the “Affiliated Sub-Advisers”), to a holding company affiliated with private funds of GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. (the “Transaction”). The Boards further noted that the Transaction would result in a change-of-control of Funds Management and the Affiliated Sub-Advisers, which would be considered to be an “assignment” under the 1940 Act that would terminate the Current Advisory Agreements. At the Board Meeting, the Boards also reviewed and approved new investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements (the “New Advisory Agreements”) for each Trust and Fund, as applicable, that would replace the Current Advisory Agreements upon consummation of the Transaction, subject to approval of the New Advisory Agreements by the applicable Trust’s or Fund’s shareholders. The factors considered and conclusions reached by the Boards in approving the New Advisory Agreements are summarized in the section entitled “Board Considerations – New Agreements” of this shareholder report.
At the Board Meeting, the Boards also approved the Interim Advisory Agreements, which will go into effect for a Trust or Fund only in the event that shareholders of such Trust or Fund do not approve the New Advisory Agreement(s) for the Trust or Fund by the closing date of the Transaction, when the Current Advisory Agreements will terminate. The Board noted that, in such a circumstance, the Interim Advisory Agreements will permit continuity of management by allowing Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to continue providing services to the Trust or Fund pursuant to the Interim Advisory Agreements while the Trust or Fund continues to solicit shareholder approval of such New Advisory Agreement(s). The Boards noted that the terms of the Interim Advisory Agreements are identical to those of the Current Advisory Agreements, except for the term and the addition of escrow provisions with respect to the advisory fees. The Boards also noted that the entities that would service the Funds and Trusts under the Interim Advisory Agreements are identical to those that provide services under the Current Advisory Agreements and those that will provide services under the New Advisory Agreements.
In approving the Interim Advisory Agreements, the Boards considered the same factors and reached the same conclusions as they considered and reached with respect to the Boards’ approvals of the Current Advisory Agreements and New Advisory Agreements, as applicable, which are described in separate Board Consideration sections within this shareholder report. Prior to the Board Meeting, including at a series of meetings held in April and May 2021, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. about the Interim Advisory Agreements and related matters. The Independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Interim Advisory Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately.
At the Board Meeting, after considering the factors and reaching the conclusions described in the separate Board Consideration sections within this shareholder report, the Boards unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and to each Sub-Adviser under each of the Interim Advisory Agreements was reasonable, and approved the Interim Advisory Agreements.

Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund  |  77


For more information
More information about Wells Fargo Funds is available free upon request. To obtain literature, please write, visit the Fund's website, or call:
Wells Fargo Funds
P.O. Box 219967
Kansas City, MO 64121-9967
Website: wfam.com
Individual investors: 1-800-222-8222
Retail investment professionals: 1-888-877-9275
Institutional investment professionals: 1-866-765-0778
This report and the financial statements contained herein are submitted for the general information of the shareholders of the Fund. If this report is used for promotional purposes, distribution of the report must be accompanied or preceded by a current prospectus. Before investing, please consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of the investment. For a current prospectus and, if available, a summary prospectus, containing this information, call 1-800-222-8222 or visit the Fund's website at wfam.com. Read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) is the trade name for certain investment advisory/management firms owned by Wells Fargo & Company. These firms include but are not limited to Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC. Certain products managed by WFAM entities are distributed by Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC (a broker-dealer and Member FINRA).
This material is for general informational and educational purposes only and is NOT intended to provide investment advice or a recommendation of any kind - including a recommendation for any specific investment, strategy, or plan.
 INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED  ■  NO BANK GUARANTEE  ■  MAY LOSE VALUE 
© 2021 Wells Fargo & Company. All rights reserved.
PAR-0621-00769 07-21
A287/AR287 05-21


Annual Report
May 31, 2021
Wells Fargo Real Return Fund




Contents

2

6

10
Wells Fargo Real Return Fund  

11
Financial statements  

12

13

14

15

20

25
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio  

26
Financial statements  

38

39

40

41

42

49

50
Board considerations  

55

59

65
 
Reduce clutter.
Save trees.
Sign up for electronic delivery of prospectuses and shareholder reports at wellsfargo.com/ advantagedelivery
The views expressed and any forward-looking statements are as of May 31, 2021, unless otherwise noted, and are those of the Fund's portfolio managers and/or Wells Fargo Asset Management. Discussions of individual securities or the markets generally are not intended as individual recommendations. Future events or results may vary significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. The views expressed are subject to change at any time in response to changing circumstances in the market. Wells Fargo Asset Management and the Fund disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any views expressed or forward-looking statements.
 INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED  ■  NO BANK GUARANTEE  ■  MAY LOSE VALUE 

Wells Fargo Real Return Fund  |  1


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
Andrew Owen
President
Wells Fargo Funds
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to offer you this annual report for the Wells Fargo Real Return Fund for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021. Despite the initial challenges presented by the spread of COVID-19 cases and the business restrictions implemented throughout much of the world, global stocks showed robust returns, supported by global stimulus programs, a rapid vaccination rollout, and recovering consumer and corporate sentiment. Bond markets mostly produced positive returns, as investors searched for yield and diversification during difficult market stretches.
For the 12-month period, equities had robust returns, as policymakers continued to fight the effects of COVID-19. Emerging market stocks led both non-U.S. developed market equities and U.S. stocks. Gains by fixed-income securities were varied, though mostly positive. For the period, U.S. stocks, based on the S&P 500 Index,1 gained 40.32%. International stocks, as measured by the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net),2 returned 42.78%, while the MSCI EM Index (Net),3 had stronger performance, with a 51.00% gain. Among bond indexes, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index,4 returned -0.40%, the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (unhedged),5 gained 7.84%, the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index,6 returned 4.74%, and the ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index,7 returned 15.18%.
The COVID-19 lockdown began over a year ago.
By June, economies started to reopen and global central banks committed to do all they could to provide economic support through liquidity and low borrowing costs. U.S. economic activity was aided by one-time $1,200 stimulus checks and $600 weekly bonus unemployment benefits that lasted through July. However, unemployment remained historically high and COVID-19 cases began to increase by late June. China’s economic recovery began to pick up momentum.
July was broadly positive for equities and fixed income. However, economic data and a resurgence of COVID-19 cases underscored the urgent need to regain control of the pandemic. Second-quarter gross domestic product (GDP) shrank from the previous quarter by 9.5% and 12.1% in the U.S. and the eurozone, respectively. In contrast, China’s second-quarter GDP grew 3.2% year over year. The U.S. economy added 1.8 million jobs in July, but a double-digit jobless rate persisted.

1 The S&P 500 Index consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. It is a market-value-weighted index with each stock's weight in the index proportionate to its market value. You cannot invest directly in an index.
2 The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) All Country World Index (ACWI) ex USA Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed and emerging markets, excluding the United States. Source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI. You cannot invest directly in an index.
3 The MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure equity market performance of emerging markets. You cannot invest directly in an index.
4 The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based benchmark that measures the investment-grade, U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage pass-throughs), asset-backed securities, and commercial mortgage-backed securities. You cannot invest directly in an index.
5 The Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (unhedged) is an unmanaged index that provides a broad-based measure of the global investment-grade fixed-income markets excluding the U.S. dollar-denominated debt market. You cannot invest directly in an index.
6 The Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index composed of long-term tax-exempt bonds with a minimum credit rating of Baa. You cannot invest directly in an index.
7 The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index of domestic and Yankee high-yield bonds. The index tracks the performance of high-yield securities traded in the U.S. bond market. You cannot invest directly in an index. Copyright 2021. ICE Data Indices, LLC. All rights reserved.

2  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Fund


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
The stock market continued to rally in August despite concerns over rising numbers of U.S. and European COVID-19 cases as well as the July expiration of the $600 weekly bonus unemployment benefit. Relatively strong second-quarter earnings boosted investor sentiment along with the U.S. Federal Reserve Board’s (Fed’s) announcement of a monetary policy shift expected to support longer-term low interest rates. U.S. manufacturing and services activity indexes beat expectations while the U.S. housing market maintained strength. In Europe, retail sales expanded and consumer confidence was steady. China’s economy continued to expand.
Stocks grew more volatile in September on mixed economic data. U.S. economic activity continued to grow. However, U.S. unemployment remained elevated at 7.9% in September. With the U.S. Congress delaying further fiscal relief and uncertainties surrounding a possible vaccine, doubts crept back into the financial markets. In the U.K., a lack of progress in Brexit talks weighed on markets. China’s economy picked up steam, fueled by increased global demand.
In October, capital markets stepped back from their six-month rally. Market volatility rose in advance of the U.S. election and amid a global increase in COVID-19 infections. Europe introduced tighter restrictions affecting economic activity. U.S. markets looked favorably at the prospect of Democratic control of the federal purse strings, which could lead to additional fiscal stimulus and a boost to economic activity. Meanwhile, China reported 4.9% third-quarter GDP growth.
Global stocks rallied in November, propelled by optimism over three promising COVID-19 vaccines. Reversing recent trends, value stocks outperformed growth stocks and cyclical stocks outpaced information technology (IT) stocks. However, U.S. unemployment remained elevated, with a net job loss of 10 million since February. The eurozone services Purchasing Managers' Index, a monthly survey of purchasing managers, contracted sharply while the region’s manufacturing activity grew. The U.S. election results added to the upbeat mood as investors anticipated more consistent policies in the new administration.
Financial markets ended the year with strength on high expectations for a rapid rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines, the successful passage of a $900 billion stimulus package, and rising expectations of additional economic support from a Democratic-led Congress. U.S. economic data were mixed with still-elevated unemployment and weak retail sales but growth in manufacturing output. In contrast, China’s economic expansion continued in both manufacturing and nonmanufacturing. U.S. COVID-19 infection rates continued to rise even as new state and local lockdown measures were implemented.
The calendar year 2021 began with emerging market stocks leading all major asset classes in January, driven by China’s strong economic growth and a broad recovery in corporate earnings, which propelled China’s stock market higher. In the U.S., positive news on vaccine trials and January expansion in both the manufacturing and services sectors was offset by a weak December monthly jobs report. This was compounded by technical factors as some hedge funds were forced to sell stocks to protect themselves against a well-publicized short squeeze coordinated by a group of retail investors. Eurozone sentiment and economic growth were particularly weak, reflecting the impact of a new lockdown with stricter social distancing along with a slow vaccine rollout.
February saw major domestic equity indexes driven higher on the hope of a new stimulus bill, improving COVID-19 vaccination numbers, and the gradual reopening of the economy. Most S&P 500 companies reported better-than-expected earnings, with positive surprises coming from the financials, IT, health care, and materials sectors. Japan saw its economy strengthen as a result of strong export numbers. Meanwhile, crude oil prices continued their climb, rising more than 25% for the year. Domestic government bonds experienced a sharp sell-off in late February as markets priced in a more robust economic recovery and higher future growth and inflation expectations.
Global stocks rallied in November, propelled by optimism over three promising COVID-19 vaccines.

Wells Fargo Real Return Fund  |  3


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
The passage of the massive domestic stimulus bill highlighted March activity, leading to increased forecasts for U.S. growth in 2021.
The passage of the massive domestic stimulus bill highlighted March activity, leading to increased forecasts for U.S. growth in 2021. Domestic employment surged as COVID-19 vaccinations and an increasingly open economy spurred hiring. A majority of U.S. small companies reported they were operating at pre-pandemic capacity or higher. Value stocks continued its outperformance of growth stocks in the month, continuing the trend that started in late 2020. Meanwhile, most major developed global equity indexes were up month to date on the back of rising optimism regarding the outlook for global growth. While the U.S. and U.K. have been the most successful in terms of the vaccine rollout, even in markets where the vaccine has lagged, such as in the eurozone and Japan, equity indexes in many of those countries have also been in positive territory this year.
Equity markets produced another strong showing in April. Domestically, the continued reopening of the economy had a strong impact on positive equity performance, as people started leaving their households and jobless claims continued to fall. Domestic corporate bonds performed well and the U.S. dollar weakened. Meanwhile, the U.S. government continued to seek to invest in the recovery, this time by outlining a package of over $2 billion to improve infrastructure. The primary headwind in April was inflation, as investors tried to determine the breadth and longevity of recent price increases. Developed Europe has been supported by a meaningful increase in the pace of vaccinations. Unfortunately many emerging market countries have not been as successful. India in particular has seen COVID-19 cases surge, serving as an example of the need to get vaccinations rolled out to less developed nations.
Vaccine rollouts continued in May, leading to loosened restrictions globally. As a result, equity markets in general saw a minor increase in returns. Concerns that the continued economic rebound could result in inflation increases becoming more than transitory were supported by the higher input costs businesses are experiencing. Meanwhile, those inflation concerns were tempered by the Fed, which stayed steady on its view of the economy and eased fears of a sudden and substantial policy change. Positive performance in the emerging market equity space was supported this month by steady consumer demand and strong commodity prices. Fixed-income markets were also slightly positive for the month, driven by inflation uncertainty and a softer U.S. dollar.
Don’t let short-term uncertainty derail long-term investment goals.
Periods of investment uncertainty can present challenges, but experience has taught us that maintaining long-term investment goals can be an effective way to plan for the future. Although diversification cannot guarantee an investment profit or prevent losses, we believe it can be an effective way to manage investment risk and potentially smooth out overall portfolio performance. We encourage investors to know their investments and to understand that appropriate levels of risk-taking may unlock opportunities.
Thank you for choosing to invest with Wells Fargo Funds. We appreciate your confidence in us and remain committed to helping you meet your financial needs.
Sincerely,
Andrew Owen
President
Wells Fargo Funds

For further information about your Fund, contact your investment professional, visit our website at wfam.com, or call us directly at 1-800-222-8222.

4  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Fund


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
Preparing for LIBOR Transition
The global financial industry is preparing to transition away from the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), a key benchmark interest rate, to new alternative rates. LIBOR underpins more than $350 trillion of financial contracts. It is the benchmark rate for a wide spectrum of products ranging from residential mortgages to corporate bonds to derivatives. Regulators have called for a market-wide transition away from LIBOR to successor reference rates by the end of 2021 (expected to be extended through June 30, 2023 for most tenors of the U.S. dollar LIBOR), which requires proactive steps be taken by issuers, counterparties, and asset managers to identify impacted products and adopt new reference rates.
The Fund invests in an underlying fund that holds one or more securities that use LIBOR as a floating reference rate and has a maturity date after December 31, 2021.
Although the transition process away from LIBOR has become increasingly well-defined in advance of the anticipated discontinuation date, there remains uncertainty regarding the nature of successor reference rates, and any potential effects of the transition away from LIBOR on investment instruments that use it as a benchmark rate. The transition process may result in, among other things, increased volatility or illiquidity in markets for instruments that currently rely on LIBOR and could negatively impact the value of certain instruments held by the Fund.
Wells Fargo Asset Management is monitoring LIBOR exposure closely and has put resources and controls in place to manage this transition effectively. The Fund’s portfolio management team is evaluating LIBOR holdings to understand what happens to those securities when LIBOR ceases to exist, including examining security documentation to identify the presence or absence of fallback language identifying a replacement rate to LIBOR.
While the pace of transition away from LIBOR will differ by asset class and investment strategy, the portfolio management team will monitor market conditions for those holdings to identify and mitigate deterioration or volatility in pricing and liquidity and ensure appropriate actions are taken in a timely manner.
Further information regarding the potential risks associated with the discontinuation of LIBOR can be found in the Fund’s Statement of Additional Information.

Wells Fargo Real Return Fund  |  5


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Investment objective The Fund seeks returns that exceed the rate of inflation over the long-term.
Manager Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC
Subadviser for the affiliated master portfolio*
Wells Capital Management Incorporated
Portfolio managers Kandarp R. Acharya, CFA®, FRM, Petros N. Bocray, CFA®, FRM, Michael Bradshaw, CFA®, Christian L. Chan, CFA®, Jay N. Mueller, CFA®, Garth B. Newport, CFA®, Michael Schueller, CFA®
    
Average annual total returns (%) as of May 31, 2021
    Including sales charge   Excluding sales charge   Expense ratios1 (%)
  Inception date 1 year 5 year 10 year   1 year 5 year 10 year   Gross Net 2
Class A (IPBAX) 2-28-2003 4.19 3.13 2.63   9.10 4.09 3.10   1.43 0.78
Class C (IPBCX) 2-28-2003 7.27 3.32 2.34   8.27 3.32 2.34   2.18 1.53
Class R6 (IPBJX)3 10-31-2016   9.52 4.49 3.43   1.05 0.40
Administrator Class (IPBIX) 2-28-2003   9.31 4.31 3.34   1.37 0.60
Institutional Class (IPBNX)4 10-31-2016   9.46 4.43 3.40   1.10 0.45
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. TIPS Index5   7.05 4.48 3.42  
CPI 6   4.99 2.30 1.77  
Figures quoted represent past performance, which is no guarantee of future results, and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder may pay on an investment in a fund. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance shown without sales charges would be lower if sales charges were reflected. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted, which assumes the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. Current month-end performance is available on the Fund’s website, wfam.com.
Index returns do not include transaction costs associated with buying and selling securities, any mutual fund fees or expenses, or any taxes. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
For Class A shares, the maximum front-end sales charge is 4.50%. For Class C shares, the maximum contingent deferred sales charge is 1.00%. Performance including a contingent deferred sales charge assumes the sales charge for the corresponding time period. Class R6, Administrator Class, and Institutional Class shares are sold without a front-end sales charge or contingent deferred sales charge.
1 Reflects the expense ratios as stated in the most recent prospectuses. The expense ratios shown are subject to change and may differ from the annualized expense ratios shown in the financial highlights of this report.
2 The manager has contractually committed through September 30, 2021, to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers at 0.78% for Class A, 1.53% for Class C, 0.40% for Class R6, 0.60% for Administrator Class, and 0.45% for Institutional Class. Brokerage commissions, stamp duty fees, interest, taxes, acquired fund fees and expenses (if any) from funds in which the affiliated master portfolio invests, and extraordinary expenses are excluded from the expense caps. Net expenses from the affiliated master portfolio are included in the expense caps. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. Without these caps, the Fund’s returns would have been lower. The expense ratio paid by an investor is the net expense ratio (the total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers) as stated in the prospectuses.
3 Historical performance shown for the Class R6 shares prior to their inception reflects the performance of the Administrator Class shares, and is not adjusted to reflect the Class R6 expenses. If these expenses had been included, returns for the Class R6 shares would be higher.
4 Historical performance shown for the Institutional Class shares prior to their inception reflects the performance of the Administrator Class shares, and is not adjusted to reflect the Institutional Class expenses. If these expenses had been included, returns for the Institutional Class shares would be higher.
5 The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) Index is an index of inflation-indexed-linked U.S. Treasury securities. You cannot invest directly in an index.
6 The Consumer Price Index (CPI) for All Urban Consumers in U.S. All Items is published monthly by the U.S. government as an indicator of changes in price levels (or inflation) paid by urban consumers for a representative basket of goods and services. You cannot invest directly in an index.

* The Fund is a feeder fund in a master-feeder structure that invests substantially all of its assets in a single affiliated master portfolio of the Wells Fargo Master Trust with a substantially identical investment objective and substantially similar investment strategies. References to the investment activities of the Fund are intended to refer to the investment activities of the affiliated master portfolio in which it invests.
CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.
Mr. Mueller is expected to retire December 31, 2021. He will remain a portfolio manager of the Fund through October 31, 2021, at which time he will transition to the role of advisor to the team until his retirement.

6  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Fund


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Growth of $10,000 investment as of May 31, 20211
1 The chart compares the performance of Class A shares for the most recent ten years with the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. TIPS Index and CPI. The chart assumes a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in Class A shares and reflects all operating expenses and assumes the maximum initial sales charge of 4.50%.
Bond values fluctuate in response to the financial condition of individual issuers, general market and economic conditions, and changes in interest rates. Changes in market conditions and government policies may lead to periods of heightened volatility in the bond market and reduced liquidity for certain bonds held by the fund. In general, when interest rates rise, bond values fall and investors may lose principal value. Interest rate changes and their impact on the fund and its share price can be sudden and unpredictable. Stock values fluctuate in response to the activities of individual companies and general market and economic conditions. High-yield securities have a greater risk of default and tend to be more volatile than higher-rated debt securities. Loans are subject to risks similar to those associated with other below-investment-grade bond investments, such as credit risk (for example, risk of greater volatility in value), and risk that the loan may become illiquid or difficult to price. The use of derivatives may reduce returns and/or increase volatility. Foreign investments are especially volatile and can rise or fall dramatically due to differences in the political and economic conditions of the host country. These risks are generally intensified in emerging markets. Securities issued by U.S. government agencies or government-sponsored entities may not be guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury. This fund is exposed to mortgage- and asset-backed securities risk and small-company securities risk. Consult the Fund’s prospectus for additional information on these and other risks.

Wells Fargo Real Return Fund  |  7


Performance highlights (unaudited)
MANAGER'S DISCUSSION
Fund highlights
The Fund outperformed its benchmark, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) Index, for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021.
TIPS and other inflation-sensitive growth assets in the portfolio performed well over the period and all contributed to relative performance.
While all components performed well versus the TIPS Index, relative to sector-specific benchmarks, a number of the sleeves lagged.
Stock markets posted remarkable gains as the world recuperated from the pandemic; the same is not true for the fixed-income markets.
The 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021, saw strong results from the broad U.S. equity markets, as illustrated by the Russell 3000® Index’s* return of 43.91%. The broad foreign markets also did well, as reflected by the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net)'s** return of 42.78%. The broad U.S. fixed-income market, as represented by the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index***, posted a slightly negative return of -0.40%. However, that result does not show the dichotomy within the fixed-income markets. Long-maturity U.S. Treasury bonds, as captured by the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index, declined 13.85% as long-term Treasury yields rose over the period. In contrast, high-yield bonds, as shown by the ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index††, advanced 15.18% as credit spreads compressed over the period. Concerns over inflation helped TIPS before better-than-similar-maturity Treasury bonds as the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. TIPS Index posted a 6.95% gain for the trailing 12 months. Aided by unprecedented levels of monetary and fiscal stimulus, the economy staged an impressive recovery from the pandemic contraction and risky assets performed very well.
Ten largest holdings (%) as of May 31, 20211
TIPS, 0.38%, 1-15-2027 3.18
TIPS, 0.38%, 7-15-2025 2.89
TIPS, 0.63%, 1-15-2026 2.57
TIPS, 0.13%, 7-15-2030 2.48
TIPS, 0.63%, 1-15-2024 2.31
TIPS, 0.13%, 7-15-2024 2.26
TIPS, 0.38%, 7-15-2023 2.11
TIPS, 0.25%, 1-15-2025 2.10
TIPS, 0.13%, 1-15-2030 1.97
TIPS, 0.50%, 1-15-2028 1.89
1 Each holding represents the Fund’s allocable portion of the affiliated master portfolio security. Figures represent each holding as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets. Holdings are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
The Fund uses a multi-asset-class strategy to target inflation protection.
During the 12-month period, we maintained allocations to TIPS as well as other inflation-sensitive sectors, such as real estate investment trusts (REITs), short-term high-yield bonds, and inflation-sensitive equities. We used this multi-asset-class strategy to target greater inflation protection and real returns than a traditional inflation-hedged strategy might while seeking to achieve similar levels of volatility.
 

* The Russell 3000® Index measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization, which represents approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market. You cannot invest directly in an index.
** The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) All Country World Index (ACWI) ex USA Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. Source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indexes or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI. You cannot invest directly in an index

* The Russell 3000® Index measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization, which represents approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market. You cannot invest directly in an index.
*** The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based benchmark that measures the investment-grade, U.S.-dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage pass-throughs), asset-backed securities, and commercial mortgage-backed securities. You cannot invest directly in an index.

* The Russell 3000® Index measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization, which represents approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market. You cannot invest directly in an index.
The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index measures U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate, nominal debt issued by the U.S. Treasury with 20+ years to maturity. Treasury bills are excluded by the maturity constraint, but are part of a separate Short Treasury Index. STRIPS are excluded from the index because their inclusion would result in double-counting. You cannot invest directly in an index.

* The Russell 3000® Index measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization, which represents approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market. You cannot invest directly in an index.
†† The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index of domestic and Yankee high-yield bonds. The index tracks the performance of high-yield securities traded in the U.S. bond market. You cannot invest directly in an index. Copyright 2021. ICE Data Indices, LLC. All rights reserved.

8  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Fund


Performance highlights (unaudited)
The largest allocation within the Fund is our investment in TIPS. Due to some duration positioning, this sleeve performed about 50 basis points (bps; 100 bps equal 1.00%) ahead of its benchmark. Relative to the broad TIPS benchmark, all of the other sleeves contributed positively to the relative performance of the Fund. While the STEM (consumer staples, energy, and materials) sleeve advanced more than 28%, the portfolio underperformed a passive STEM portfolio because of poor stock selection, particularly within energy stocks. The REIT sleeve advanced 26.41%, the precious metals mining stocks advanced 12.29%, and the high-yield holdings increased by 9.53%.
Looking ahead, we are guardedly optimistic.
The massive amount of uncertainty we faced last year at this time has faded. While the daunting impacts of the virus, U.S. civil unrest, domestic politics, and geopolitical tensions are still very fresh in our mind’s eye, we increasingly see these issues in the rear-view mirror. The rollout of the vaccine, the reduction of political rhetoric, and a very accommodative Federal Reserve Board (Fed) have all helped calm fears. While COVID-19 cases are declining and America is returning to work, we are focused on understanding the economic impacts of the recent unprecedented monetary and fiscal policy effects on the portfolio. While we expect equity
Portfolio allocation as of May 31, 20211
1 Figures represent the sector allocation of the affiliated master portfolio as a percentage of the long-term investments of the affiliated master portfolio. These amounts are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
markets will continue to advance over the next 12 months, it will be at a much slower pace than over the past 12 months. We know there are new risks around the corner. We are concerned about future inflation and we are not fully convinced it is transitory in nature. The U.S. Treasury is issuing a large quantity of bonds, the Fed is purchasing a large quantity of bonds, and we continue to monitor closely the duration and credit composition of our fixed-income investments. There are many unknowns, and despite some optimism, we continue to monitor the situation very carefully.
 

Wells Fargo Real Return Fund  |  9


Fund expenses (unaudited)
As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and contingent deferred sales charges (if any) on redemptions and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) and/or shareholder servicing fees, and other Fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period from December 1, 2020 to May 31, 2021.
Actual expenses
The “Actual” line of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the “Actual” line under the heading entitled “Expenses paid during period” for your applicable class of shares to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes
The “Hypothetical” line of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) and contingent deferred sales charges. Therefore, the “Hypothetical” line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
  Beginning
account value
12-1-2020
Ending
account value
5-31-2021
Expenses
paid during
the period1,2
Annualized net
expense ratio2
Class A        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,036.20 $3.96 0.78%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,021.04 $3.93 0.78%
Class C        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,032.17 $7.75 1.53%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,017.30 $7.70 1.53%
Class R6        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,038.68 $2.03 0.40%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,022.94 $2.02 0.40%
Administrator Class        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,036.75 $3.05 0.60%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,021.94 $3.02 0.60%
Institutional Class        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,037.46 $2.29 0.45%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,022.69 $2.27 0.45%
1 Expenses paid is equal to the annualized net expense ratio of each class multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one-half-year period).
2 Amounts reflect net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio in which the Fund invests.

10  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Fund


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

          Value
Investment companies:  99.27%          
Affiliated master portfolio:  99.27%          
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio         $74,662,260
Total Investment companies (Cost $66,635,335)         74,662,260
Total investments in securities (Cost $66,635,335) 99.27%       74,662,260
Other assets and liabilities, net 0.73          549,951
Total net assets 100.00%       $75,212,211
Transactions with the affiliated Master Portfolio were as follows:
  % of
ownership,
beginning
of period
% of
ownership,
end of
period
Net realized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Interest
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Dividends
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Affiliated
income
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolio
Value,
end of
period
% of
net
assets
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio 35.29% 31.19% $277,416 $3,967,421 $1,725,292 $203,656 $689 $74,662,260 99.27%
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Real Return Fund  |  11


Statement of assets and liabilities—May 31, 2021
   
Assets  
Investments in affiliated Master Portfolio, at value (cost $66,635,335)

$ 74,662,260
Receivable for Fund shares sold

605,606
Receivable from manager

17,560
Prepaid expenses and other assets

508
Total assets

75,285,934
Liabilities  
Payable for Fund shares redeemed

43,214
Administration fees payable

4,760
Distribution fee payable

739
Accrued expenses and other liabilities

25,010
Total liabilities

73,723
Total net assets

$75,212,211
Net assets consist of  
Paid-in capital

$ 68,809,226
Total distributable earnings

6,402,985
Total net assets

$75,212,211
Computation of net asset value and offering price per share  
Net assets – Class A

$ 13,824,856
Shares outstanding – Class A1

1,264,515
Net asset value per share – Class A

$10.93
Maximum offering price per share – Class A2

$11.45
Net assets – Class C

$ 1,194,808
Shares outstanding – Class C1

111,250
Net asset value per share – Class C

$10.74
Net assets – Class R6

$ 36,202,277
Shares outstanding – Class R61

3,277,246
Net asset value per share – Class R6

$11.05
Net assets – Administrator Class

$ 13,202,915
Shares outstanding – Administrator Class1

1,187,283
Net asset value per share – Administrator Class

$11.12
Net assets – Institutional Class

$ 10,787,355
Shares outstanding – Institutional Class1

976,057
Net asset value per share – Institutional Class

$11.05
1 The Fund has an unlimited number of authorized shares.
2 Maximum offering price is computed as 100/95.50 of net asset value. On investments of $50,000 or more, the offering price is reduced.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

12  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Fund


Statement of operations—year ended May 31, 2021
   
Investment income  
Interest allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

$ 1,725,292
Dividends allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio (net of foreign withholding taxes of $433)

203,656
Affiliated income allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

689
Expenses allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

(303,910)
Waivers allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

49,674
Total investment income

1,675,401
Expenses  
Management fee

32,716
Administration fees  
Class A

21,839
Class C

2,376
Class R6

8,058
Administrator Class

13,272
Institutional Class

8,133
Shareholder servicing fees  
Class A

34,103
Class C

3,705
Administrator Class

33,162
Distribution fee  
Class C

11,128
Custody and accounting fees

3,725
Professional fees

37,760
Registration fees

132,726
Shareholder report expenses

63,082
Trustees’ fees and expenses

21,080
Other fees and expenses

12,465
Total expenses

439,330
Less: Fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements  
Fund-level

(293,645)
Class A

(8,190)
Class C

(1,188)
Administrator Class

(23,891)
Institutional Class

(5,083)
Net expenses

107,333
Net investment income

1,568,068
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments  
Net realized gains on securities transactions allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

277,416
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on securities transactions allocated from affiliated Master Portfolio

3,967,421
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

4,244,837
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

$5,812,905
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Real Return Fund  |  13


Statement of changes in net assets
         
  Year ended
May 31, 2021
Year ended
May 31, 2020
Operations        
Net investment income

  $ 1,568,068   $ 1,149,193
Net realized gains (losses) on investments

  277,416   (1,121,387)
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

  3,967,421   3,059,682
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

  5,812,905   3,087,488
Distributions to shareholders from        
Net investment income and net realized gains        
Class A

  (268,219)   (333,051)
Class C

  (19,136)   (28,644)
Class R6

  (676,727)   (410,590)
Administrator Class

  (261,977)   (268,283)
Institutional Class

  (233,102)   (274,619)
Total distributions to shareholders

  (1,459,161)   (1,315,187)
Capital share transactions Shares   Shares  
Proceeds from shares sold        
Class A

476,116 5,061,849 341,385 3,446,122
Class C

26,515 273,931 58,887 586,232
Class R6

2,143,575 23,199,949 700,870 7,155,041
Administrator Class

574,541 6,217,286 754,263 7,722,657
Institutional Class

358,193 3,851,836 587,649 6,004,061
    38,604,851   24,914,113
Reinvestment of distributions        
Class A

18,861 202,368 23,714 238,785
Class C

1,759 18,532 2,484 24,671
Class R6

28,247 306,213 22,788 231,443
Administrator Class

23,163 252,526 25,943 265,162
Institutional Class

21,437 232,476 26,962 274,014
    1,012,115   1,034,075
Payment for shares redeemed        
Class A

(521,552) (5,567,275) (865,507) (8,666,594)
Class C

(87,496) (914,008) (153,174) (1,519,143)
Class R6

(659,480) (7,182,858) (395,994) (4,031,485)
Administrator Class

(715,288) (7,756,050) (827,804) (8,434,604)
Institutional Class

(428,493) (4,604,300) (699,776) (7,084,487)
    (26,024,491)   (29,736,313)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from capital share transactions

  13,592,475   (3,788,125)
Total increase (decrease) in net assets

  17,946,219   (2,015,824)
Net assets        
Beginning of period

  57,265,992   59,281,816
End of period

  $ 75,212,211   $ 57,265,992
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

14  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Fund


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class A 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$10.22 $9.89 $9.87 $9.96 $9.95
Net investment income

0.22 0.12 0.15 0.21 0.19 1
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

0.70 0.42 0.09 (0.09) 0.03
Total from investment operations

0.92 0.54 0.24 0.12 0.22
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.21) (0.21) (0.19) (0.21) (0.20)
Net realized gains

0.00 0.00 (0.03) 0.00 (0.01)
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.21) (0.21) (0.22) (0.21) (0.21)
Net asset value, end of period

$10.93 $10.22 $9.89 $9.87 $9.96
Total return2

9.10% 5.48% 2.56% 1.25% 2.23%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

1.29% 1.43% 1.16% 1.04% 1.11%
Net expenses

0.78% 0.78% 0.77% 0.80% 0.85%
Net investment income

2.09% 1.79% 1.95% 2.15% 1.92%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate3

20% 24% 39% 29% 25%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$13,825 $13,196 $17,716 $26,133 $29,678
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.39%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.39%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.39%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.41%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.44%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges.
3 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Real Return Fund  |  15


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class C 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$10.06 $9.73 $9.73 $9.82 $9.77
Net investment income

0.12 1 0.11 1 0.10 1 0.03 0.04
Net realized and unrealized gains on investments

0.71 0.35 0.07 0.02 0.10
Total from investment operations

0.83 0.46 0.17 0.05 0.14
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.15) (0.13) (0.14) (0.14) (0.08)
Net realized gains

0.00 0.00 (0.03) 0.00 (0.01)
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.15) (0.13) (0.17) (0.14) (0.09)
Net asset value, end of period

$10.74 $10.06 $9.73 $9.73 $9.82
Total return2

8.27% 4.77% 1.79% 0.53% 1.44%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

2.06% 2.18% 1.91% 1.79% 1.86%
Net expenses

1.53% 1.53% 1.52% 1.56% 1.60%
Net investment income

1.17% 1.09% 1.08% 1.39% 1.23%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate3

20% 24% 39% 29% 25%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$1,195 $1,714 $2,553 $3,517 $4,580
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.39%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.39%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.39%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.41%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.44%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges.
3 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

16  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Fund


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class R6 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 1
Net asset value, beginning of period

$10.33 $9.99 $9.96 $10.05 $10.17
Net investment income

0.29 0.22 0.23 2 0.22 0.10
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

0.69 0.37 0.06 (0.06) (0.07)
Total from investment operations

0.98 0.59 0.29 0.16 0.03
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.26) (0.25) (0.23) (0.25) (0.14)
Net realized gains

0.00 0.00 (0.03) 0.00 (0.01)
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.26) (0.25) (0.26) (0.25) (0.15)
Net asset value, end of period

$11.05 $10.33 $9.99 $9.96 $10.05
Total return3

9.52% 5.94% 2.99% 1.63% 0.36%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

0.85% 1.05% 0.82% 0.66% 0.69%
Net expenses

0.40% 0.40% 0.39% 0.42% 0.47%
Net investment income

2.70% 2.08% 2.34% 2.52% 1.32%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate4

20% 24% 39% 29% 25%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$36,202 $18,224 $14,358 $11,750 $7,438
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.39%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.39%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.39%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.41%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.44%
    
1 For the period from October 31, 2016 (commencement of class operations) to May 31, 2017
2 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
3 Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.
4 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Real Return Fund  |  17


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Administrator Class 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$10.38 $10.03 $9.99 $10.06 $10.03
Net investment income

0.25 1 0.20 1 0.21 1 0.24 1 0.22 1
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

0.71 0.36 0.06 (0.09) 0.02
Total from investment operations

0.96 0.56 0.27 0.15 0.24
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.22) (0.21) (0.20) (0.22) (0.20)
Net realized gains

0.00 0.00 (0.03) 0.00 (0.01)
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.22) (0.21) (0.23) (0.22) (0.21)
Net asset value, end of period

$11.12 $10.38 $10.03 $9.99 $10.06
Total return

9.31% 5.67% 2.78% 1.50% 2.46%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

1.23% 1.37% 1.10% 0.97% 1.04%
Net expenses

0.60% 0.60% 0.59% 0.60% 0.60%
Net investment income

2.26% 1.92% 2.15% 2.39% 2.20%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate2

20% 24% 39% 29% 25%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$13,203 $13,544 $13,562 $23,331 $26,100
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.39%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.39%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.39%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.41%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.44%
    
1 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
2 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

18  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Fund


Financial highlights
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Institutional Class 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 1
Net asset value, beginning of period

$10.33 $9.99 $9.97 $10.06 $10.17
Net investment income

0.26 0.21 0.22 0.24 0.14
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

0.71 0.37 0.05 (0.08) (0.10)
Total from investment operations

0.97 0.58 0.27 0.16 0.04
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.25) (0.24) (0.22) (0.25) (0.14)
Net realized gains

0.00 0.00 (0.03) 0.00 (0.01)
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.25) (0.24) (0.25) (0.25) (0.15)
Net asset value, end of period

$11.05 $10.33 $9.99 $9.97 $10.06
Total return2

9.46% 5.88% 2.84% 1.57% 0.41%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)*          
Gross expenses

0.95% 1.10% 0.84% 0.71% 0.76%
Net expenses

0.45% 0.45% 0.44% 0.47% 0.52%
Net investment income

2.37% 2.09% 2.20% 2.62% 2.24%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate3

20% 24% 39% 29% 25%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$10,787 $10,587 $11,094 $12,110 $5,229
    
* Ratios include net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolio which were as follows:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.39%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.39%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.39%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.41%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.44%
    
1 For the period from October 31, 2016 (commencement of class operations) to May 31, 2017
2 Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.
3 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the affiliated Master Portfolio’s percentage of the Fund’s total investment in securities at the end of the period by the affiliated Master Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Real Return Fund  |  19


Notes to financial statements
1. ORGANIZATION
Wells Fargo Funds Trust (the "Trust"), a Delaware statutory trust organized on March 10, 1999, is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). As an investment company, the Trust follows the accounting and reporting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, Financial Services – Investment Companies. These financial statements report on the Wells Fargo Real Return Fund (the "Fund") which is a diversified series of the Trust.
The Fund is a feeder fund in a master-feeder structure that invests substantially all of its assets in a single master portfolio with a substantially identical investment objective and substantially similar investment strategies. The Fund invests in Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio, a separate diversified portfolio (the “affiliated Master Portfolio”) of Wells Fargo Master Trust, a registered open-end management investment company. As of May 31, 2021, the Fund owned 31.19% of Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio. The affiliated Master Portfolio directly acquires portfolio securities and the Fund acquires an indirect interest in those securities. The Fund accounts for its investment in the affiliated Master Portfolio as a partnership investment and records on a daily basis its share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s income, expense and realized and unrealized gains and losses. The financial statements of the affiliated Master Portfolio for the year ended May 31, 2021 are included in this report and should be read in conjunction with the Fund’s financial statements.
On February 23, 2021, Wells Fargo & Company announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management ("WFAM") to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. WFAM is the trade name used by the asset management businesses of Wells Fargo & Company and includes Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the investment manager to the Fund, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, both registered investment advisers providing sub-advisory services to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Fund's principal underwriter. As part of the transaction, Wells Fargo & Company will own a 9.9% equity interest and will continue to serve as an important client and distribution partner.
Consummation of the transaction will result in the automatic termination of the Fund's investment management agreement and subadvisory agreement. The Fund's Board of Trustees approved a new investment management and new subadvisory agreement and approved submitting the agreements to the Fund’s shareholders for approval at a special meeting of shareholders expected to be held on August 16, 2021. Shareholders of record of the Fund at the close of business on May 28, 2021 are entitled to vote at the meeting. If shareholders approve the new agreements, they would take effect upon the closing of the transaction. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
This shareholder report is not asking you for a proxy. A separate proxy statement with more detailed information about the transaction will be provided to Fund shareholders and should be reviewed carefully.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following significant accounting policies, which are consistently followed in the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund, are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Securities valuation
All investments are valued each business day as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4 p.m. Eastern Time), although the Fund may deviate from this calculation time under unusual or unexpected circumstances.
Investments in the affiliated Master Portfolio are valued daily based on the Fund’s proportionate share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s net assets, which are also valued daily. Securities held in the affiliated Master Portfolio are valued as discussed in the Notes to Financial Statements of the affiliated Master Portfolio, which are included elsewhere in this report.
Investments which are not valued using any of the methods discussed above are valued at their fair value, as determined in good faith by the Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees has established a Valuation Committee comprised of the Trustees and has delegated to it the authority to take any actions regarding the valuation of portfolio securities that the Valuation Committee deems necessary or appropriate, including determining the fair value of portfolio securities, unless the determination has been delegated to the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee at Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC ("Funds Management"). The Board of Trustees retains the authority to make or ratify any valuation decisions or approve any changes to the Valuation Procedures as it deems appropriate. On a quarterly basis, the Board of Trustees

20  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Fund


Notes to financial statements
receives reports on any valuation actions taken by the Valuation Committee or the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee which may include items for ratification.
Investment transactions, income and expenses
Investments in the affiliated Master Portfolio are recorded on a trade date basis. The Fund records daily its proportionate share of the affiliated Master Portfolio’s income, expenses and realized and unrealized gains or losses. The Fund also accrues its own expenses.
Distributions to shareholders
Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date and paid from net investment income monthly and any net realized gains are paid at least annually. Such distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations and may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Dividend sources are estimated at the time of declaration. The tax character of distributions is determined as of the Fund's fiscal year end. Therefore, a portion of the Fund's distributions made prior to the Fund’s fiscal year end may be categorized as a tax return of capital at year end.
Federal and other taxes
The Fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by distributing substantially all of its investment company taxable income and any net realized capital gains (after reduction for capital loss carryforwards) sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes. Accordingly, no provision for federal income taxes was required.
The Fund’s income and federal excise tax returns and all financial records supporting those returns for the prior three fiscal years are subject to examination by the federal and Delaware revenue authorities. Management has analyzed the Fund's tax positions taken on federal, state, and foreign tax returns for all open tax years and does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability.
As of May 31, 2021, the aggregate cost of all investments for federal income tax purposes was $66,734,504 and the unrealized gains (losses) consisted of:
Gross unrealized gains $8,074,893
Gross unrealized losses (147,137)
Net unrealized gains $7,927,756
As of May 31, 2021, the Fund had capital loss carryforwards which consisted of $974,743 in short-term capital losses and $747,945 in long-term capital losses.
Class allocations
The separate classes of shares offered by the Fund differ principally in applicable sales charges, distribution, shareholder servicing, and administration fees. Class specific expenses are charged directly to that share class. Investment income, common fund-level expenses, and realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative proportion of net assets of each class.
3. FAIR VALUATION MEASUREMENTS
At May 31, 2021, the Fund’s investment in an affiliated Master Portfolio was measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient. The investment objective and fair value of the affiliated Master Portfolio is as follows:
Affiliated Master Portfolio Investment objective Fair value of affiliated
Master Portfolio
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio Seeks returns that exceed the rate of inflation over the long-term $74,662,260
The affiliated Master Portfolio does not have a redemption period notice, can be redeemed daily and does not have any unfunded commitments.
4. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
Management fee
Funds Management, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company ("Wells Fargo"), is the manager of the Fund and provides advisory and fund-level administrative services under an investment management agreement. Under the

Wells Fargo Real Return Fund  |  21


Notes to financial statements
investment management agreement, Funds Management is responsible for, among other services, implementing the investment objectives and strategies of the Fund and providing fund-level administrative services in connection with the Fund’s operations. As long as the Fund continues to invest substantially all of its assets in a single affiliated Master Portfolio, the Fund pays Funds Management an investment management fee only for fund-level administrative services at the following annual rate based on the Fund’s average daily net assets:
Average daily net assets Management fee
First $5 billion 0.050%
Next $5 billion 0.040
Over $10 billion 0.030
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the management fee was equivalent to an annual rate of 0.05% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
Funds Management also serves as the adviser to the affiliated Master Portfolio and is entitled to receive a fee from the affiliated Master Portfolio for those services.
Administration fees
Under a class-level administration agreement, Funds Management provides class-level administrative services to the Fund, which includes paying fees and expenses for services provided by the transfer agent, sub-transfer agents, omnibus account servicers and record-keepers. As compensation for its services under the class-level administration agreement, Funds Management receives an annual fee which is calculated based on the average daily net assets of each class as follows:
  Class-level
administration fee
Class A 0.16%
Class C 0.16
Class R6 0.03
Administrator Class 0.10
Institutional Class 0.08
Waivers and/or expense reimbursements
Funds Management has contractually waived and/or reimbursed management and administration fees to the extent necessary to maintain certain net operating expense ratios for the Fund. When each class of the Fund has exceeded its expense cap, Funds Management has waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses from fund-level expenses on a proportionate basis and then from class specific expenses. When only certain classes exceed their expense caps, waivers and/or reimbursements are applied against class specific expenses before fund-level expenses. Net expenses from the affiliated Master Portfolio are included in the expense caps. Funds Management has committed through September 30, 2021 to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap expenses. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. The contractual expense caps are as follows:
  Expense ratio caps
Class A 0.78%
Class C 1.53
Class R6 0.40
Administrator Class 0.60
Institutional Class 0.45

22  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Fund


Notes to financial statements
Distribution fee
The Trust has adopted a distribution plan for Class C shares of the Fund pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. A distribution fee is charged to Class C shares and paid to Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC ("Funds Distributor"), the principal underwriter, at an annual rate of 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class C shares.
In addition, Funds Distributor is entitled to receive the front-end sales charge from the purchase of Class A shares and a contingent deferred sales charge on the redemption of certain Class A shares. Funds Distributor is also entitled to receive the contingent deferred sales charges from redemptions of Class C shares. For the year ended May 31, 2021, Funds Distributor received $858 from the sale of Class A shares. No contingent deferred sales charges were incurred by Class A and Class C shares for the year ended May 31, 2021.
Shareholder servicing fees
The Trust has entered into contracts with one or more shareholder servicing agents, whereby Class A, Class C, and Administrator Class of the Fund are charged a fee at an annual rate of 0.25% of the average daily net assets of each respective class. A portion of these total shareholder servicing fees were paid to affiliates of Wells Fargo.
5. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS
The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing substantially all of its assets in a single affiliated Master Portfolio. Purchases and sales have been calculated by multiplying the Fund's ownership percentage of the affiliated Master Portfolio by the affiliated Master Portfolio's purchases and sales. Purchases and sales of investments, excluding short-term securities, for the year ended May 31, 2021 were as follows:
Purchases at cost   Sales proceeds
U.S.
government
Non-U.S.
government
  U.S.
government
Non-U.S.
government
$15,823,156 $16,864,981   $3,166,824 $9,407,314
6. BANK BORROWINGS
The Trust (excluding the money market funds), Wells Fargo Master Trust and Wells Fargo Variable Trust are parties to a $350,000,000 revolving credit agreement whereby the Fund is permitted to use bank borrowings for temporary or emergency purposes, such as to fund shareholder redemption requests. Interest under the credit agreement is charged to the Fund based on a borrowing rate equal to the higher of the Federal Funds rate in effect on that day plus 1.25% or the overnight LIBOR rate in effect on that day plus 1.25%. In addition, an annual commitment fee equal to 0.25% of the unused balance is allocated to each participating fund.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, there were no borrowings by the Fund under the agreement.
7. DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS
The tax character of distributions paid was $1,459,161 and $1,315,187 of ordinary income for the years ended May 31, 2021 and May 31, 2020, respectively.
As of May 31, 2021, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Undistributed
ordinary
income
Unrealized
gains
Capital loss
carryforward
$197,917 $7,927,756 $(1,722,688)
8. INDEMNIFICATION
Under the Fund's organizational documents, the officers and Trustees have been granted certain indemnification rights against certain liabilities that may arise out of performance of their duties to the Fund. The Fund has entered into a separate agreement with each Trustee that converts indemnification rights currently existing under the Fund’s organizational documents into contractual rights that cannot be changed in the future without the consent of the Trustee. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with service providers that contain a variety of indemnification

Wells Fargo Real Return Fund  |  23


Notes to financial statements
clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent on future claims that may be made against the Fund and, therefore, cannot be estimated.
9. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
In August 2018, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 updates the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Management has adopted this guidance which did not have a material impact on the financial statements.
10. CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization announced that it had made the assessment that coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) is a pandemic. The impacts of COVID-19 are affecting the entire global economy, individual companies and investment products, the funds, and the market in general. There is significant uncertainty around the extent and duration of business disruptions related to COVID-19 and the impacts may last for an extended period of time. COVID-19 has led to significant uncertainty and volatility in the financial markets.
11. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
At a meeting held July 15, 2021, the Board of Trustees of the Wells Fargo Funds approved a change in the Fund's name to remove “Wells Fargo” from the Fund's name and replace with “Allspring”. The change is expected to go into effect on October 11, 2021.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) announced that it will be changing its company name to Allspring Global Investments upon the closing of the previously announced sale transaction of WFAM by Wells Fargo & Company to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. The new corporate name is expected to go into effect on the closing date of the transaction, which is anticipated to occur in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
Following the closing of the transaction, Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the Fund's investment manager, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, each sub-advisers to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Fund's principal underwriter, will each be rebranded as Allspring.

24  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Fund


Report of independent registered public accounting firm
To the Shareholders of the Fund and Board of Trustees
Wells Fargo Funds Trust:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Wells Fargo Real Return Fund (the Fund), one of the funds constituting Wells Fargo Funds Trust, including the portfolio of investments, as of May 31, 2021, the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the financial statements) and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended. In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of May 31, 2021, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Fund in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and financial highlights, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. Such procedures also included confirmation of securities owned as of May 31, 2021, by correspondence with the transfer agent. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and financial highlights. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have not been able to determine the specific year that we began serving as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies; however, we are aware that we have served as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies since at least 1955.
Boston, Massachusetts
July 28, 2021

Wells Fargo Real Return Fund  |  25


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Common stocks: 14.74%            
Consumer staples: 4.49%            
Beverages: 0.68%            
PepsiCo Incorporated            11,052 $  1,635,033
Food & staples retailing: 1.46%            
Costco Wholesale Corporation             2,897   1,095,848
Sysco Corporation             9,235     748,035
Walmart Incorporated            11,631   1,651,951
              3,495,834
Food products: 0.68%            
Mondelez International Incorporated Class A            13,820     877,985
Nomad Foods Limited            24,189     741,877
              1,619,862
Household products: 1.53%            
Church & Dwight Company Incorporated            10,877     932,485
The Clorox Company             2,362     417,436
The Procter & Gamble Company            17,189   2,317,937
              3,667,858
Tobacco: 0.14%            
Philip Morris International Incorporated             3,473     334,901
Energy: 1.22%            
Oil, gas & consumable fuels: 1.22%            
Chevron Corporation            16,107   1,671,746
Phillips 66            14,756   1,242,750
Materials: 3.98%            
Chemicals: 1.74%            
Ashland Global Holdings Incorporated         4,440 421,090
Ecolab Incorporated         2,972 639,218
Linde plc         5,378 1,616,627
The Sherwin-Williams Company         3,378 957,764
Westlake Chemical Corporation         5,347 539,352
            4,174,051
Construction materials: 0.21%            
Martin Marietta Materials Incorporated         1,387 504,383
Containers & packaging: 0.17%            
Crown Holdings Incorporated         3,905 403,152
Metals & mining: 1.86%            
Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited         2,800 200,900
Alamos Gold Incorporated Class A         12,000 108,964
AngloGold Ashanti Limited ADR         5,100 121,227
B2Gold Corporation         24,000 122,883
Barrick Gold Corporation         10,456 251,780
Centerra Gold Incorporated         5,000 40,514
Dundee Precious Metals Incorporated         4,000 28,534
Eldorado Gold Corporation         2,500 29,640
Endeavour Mining Corporation         6,280 151,719
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

26  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

        Shares Value
Metals & mining (continued)            
Evolution Mining Limited            22,000 $      92,110
Franco-Nevada Corporation             1,400     206,926
Gold Fields Limited ADR            14,500     175,595
Kinross Gold Corporation            33,500     270,054
Kirkland Lake Gold Limited             5,237     225,187
Lundin Gold Incorporated             7,100      70,941
MAG Silver Corporation             3,400      72,986
Newcrest Mining Limited             6,600     144,651
Newmont Corporation             5,290     388,709
Northern Star Resources Limited            15,000     135,819
Pan American Silver Corporation             3,000     100,920
Pretium Resources Incorporated             3,000      34,101
Royal Gold Incorporated             3,783     468,222
SilverCrest Metals Incorporated             4,000      39,569
SSR Mining Incorporated             3,000      55,650
SSR Mining Incorporated - U.S. Exchange Traded Shares             1,272      23,343
Steel Dynamics Incorporated             9,167     572,296
Torex Gold Resources Incorporated             6,200      90,663
Wheaton Precious Metals Corporation             4,600     218,262
              4,442,165
Real estate: 5.05%            
Equity REITs: 5.05%            
Alexandria Real Estate Equities Incorporated             2,979     531,037
American Homes 4 Rent Class A         14,628 556,888
American Tower Corporation         5,615 1,434,408
Camden Property Trust         2,860 358,587
CoreSite Realty Corporation         3,630 440,138
Equinix Incorporated         1,511 1,113,170
Federal Realty Investment Trust         2,820 322,439
Four Corners Property Trust Incorporated         18,626 517,058
Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated         10,908 330,949
Host Hotels & Resorts Incorporated         17,241 296,028
Invitation Homes Incorporated         16,155 585,942
Life Storage Incorporated         4,894 486,659
Mid-America Apartment Communities Incorporated         2,179 350,165
Prologis Incorporated         9,409 1,108,757
SBA Communications Corporation         3,012 897,937
Simon Property Group Incorporated         2,538 326,108
STAG Industrial Incorporated         6,723 240,078
Sun Communities Incorporated         4,406 737,653
VICI Properties Incorporated         26,650 829,615
Welltower Incorporated         8,230 615,357
Total Common stocks (Cost $24,963,871)           35,270,708
    
    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal  
Corporate bonds and notes: 13.08%            
Communication services: 1.47%            
Diversified telecommunication services: 0.38%            
CenturyLink Incorporated   6.75% 12-1-2023 $   260,000     286,507
CommScope Holding Company Incorporated 144A   5.50 3-1-2024     290,000     298,323
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio  |  27


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Diversified telecommunication services (continued)            
Level 3 Financing Incorporated   5.38% 5-1-2025 $    85,000 $      86,879
Lumen Technologies Incorporated   7.50 4-1-2024     215,000     240,800
                912,509
Entertainment: 0.14%            
Live Nation Entertainment Incorporated 144A   4.88 11-1-2024     170,000     173,096
Live Nation Entertainment Incorporated 144A   6.50 5-15-2027     150,000     165,563
                338,659
Media: 0.87%            
CCO Holdings LLC 144A   5.13 5-1-2027     600,000     627,000
Cinemark USA Incorporated 144A   8.75 5-1-2025     335,000     364,313
Compression Partners LP   6.88 9-1-2027      20,000      20,994
CSC Holdings LLC 144A   5.50 4-15-2027     200,000     210,000
DISH DBS Corporation   5.00 3-15-2023     200,000     207,750
DISH DBS Corporation   5.88 7-15-2022     190,000     197,600
Townsquare Media Incorporated 144A   6.88 2-1-2026     415,000     438,344
              2,066,001
Wireless telecommunication services: 0.08%            
Sprint Corporation   7.88 9-15-2023     155,000     175,632
Sprint Spectrum Company LLC 144A   3.36 3-20-2023      21,875      21,912
                197,544
Consumer discretionary: 2.44%            
Auto components: 0.24%            
Clarios Global LP 144A   6.75 5-15-2025     185,000     198,181
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company   5.00 5-31-2026   376,000 386,111
            584,292
Automobiles: 0.36%            
Ford Motor Company   4.13 8-17-2027   400,000 418,000
Ford Motor Company   8.50 4-21-2023   355,000 396,269
Ford Motor Company   9.00 4-22-2025   45,000 54,980
            869,249
Hotels, restaurants & leisure: 0.83%            
Carnival Corporation 144A   10.50 2-1-2026   225,000 265,361
Carnival Corporation 144A   11.50 4-1-2023   230,000 263,164
NCL Corporation Limited 144A   12.25 5-15-2024   550,000 665,500
Royal Caribbean Cruises Limited 144A   9.13 6-15-2023   325,000 359,515
Royal Caribbean Cruises Limited 144A   11.50 6-1-2025   370,000 428,275
            1,981,815
Household durables: 0.18%            
KB Home Class B   7.50 9-15-2022   315,000 338,625
Newell Brands Incorporated   4.35 4-1-2023   93,000 97,762
            436,387
Internet & direct marketing retail: 0.06%            
QVC Incorporated   4.38 3-15-2023   140,000 146,936
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

28  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Multiline retail: 0.28%            
Macy's Incorporated 144A   8.38% 6-15-2025 $   605,000 $     668,525
Specialty retail: 0.47%            
L Brands Incorporated   5.63 10-15-2023      65,000      70,525
L Brands Incorporated 144A   9.38 7-1-2025     450,000     573,368
Penske Automotive Group Incorporated   3.50 9-1-2025     140,000     144,228
The Gap Incorporated 144A   8.63 5-15-2025     295,000     325,606
              1,113,727
Textiles, apparel & luxury goods: 0.02%            
Levi Strauss & Company   5.00 5-1-2025      36,000      36,728
Consumer staples: 0.14%            
Food products: 0.14%            
CHS Incorporated 144A   6.63 2-15-2025     315,000     331,538
Energy: 2.28%            
Energy equipment & services: 0.16%            
Oceaneering International Incorporated   4.65 11-15-2024     375,000     375,938
Oil, gas & consumable fuels: 2.12%            
Antero Midstream Company   5.38 9-15-2024     485,000     497,998
Apache Corporation   4.63 11-15-2025      70,000      74,286
Buckeye Partners LP   4.15 7-1-2023     200,000     206,846
Continental Resources Incorporated   4.50 4-15-2023     600,000     626,400
Crestwood Midstream Partners LP   5.75 4-1-2025     225,000     230,558
DCP Midstream Operating LP   5.38 7-15-2025     455,000     498,407
EnLink Midstream Partners LP   4.15 6-1-2025     870,000     887,852
Enviva Partners LP 144A   6.50 1-15-2026   645,000 675,960
EQT Corporation   7.63 2-1-2025   85,000 99,272
New Fortress Energy Incorporated 144A   6.50 9-30-2026   220,000 221,375
Occidental Petroleum Corporation (3 Month LIBOR+1.45%) ±   1.61 8-15-2022   120,000 119,102
Occidental Petroleum Corporation   8.00 7-15-2025   305,000 358,714
Ovintiv Exploration Incorporated   3.90 11-15-2021   155,000 155,726
Ovintiv Exploration Incorporated   5.75 1-30-2022   90,000 92,976
Southwestern Energy Company   6.45 1-23-2025   90,000 98,570
Tallgrass Energy Partners LP 144A   7.50 10-1-2025   225,000 245,664
            5,089,706
Financials: 1.75%            
Consumer finance: 0.75%            
Hawaiian Brand Intellectual Property Limited 144A   5.75 1-20-2026   340,000 361,250
Navient Corporation   7.25 9-25-2023   145,000 158,956
SLM Corporation   5.50 1-25-2023   470,000 491,738
Springleaf Finance Corporation   6.13 3-15-2024   295,000 317,863
Springleaf Finance Corporation   8.88 6-1-2025   414,000 455,918
            1,785,725
Diversified financial services: 0.19%            
United Shore Financial Services LLC 144A   5.50 11-15-2025   450,000 463,172
Insurance: 0.34%            
Genworth Mortgage Holding Incorporated 144A   6.50 8-15-2025   750,000 813,750
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio  |  29


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Mortgage REITs: 0.22%            
Starwood Property Trust Incorporated   4.75% 3-15-2025 $   320,000 $     333,696
Starwood Property Trust Incorporated   5.00 12-15-2021     180,000     181,183
                514,879
Thrifts & mortgage finance: 0.25%            
Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LP 144A   5.25 3-15-2022     545,000     549,769
Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LP 144A   5.25 10-1-2025      53,000      53,928
                603,697
Health care: 0.81%            
Health care providers & services: 0.81%            
HealthSouth Corporation   5.13 3-15-2023     193,000     193,193
Magellan Health Incorporated   4.90 9-22-2024     723,000     793,529
Molina Healthcare Incorporated   5.38 11-15-2022     400,000     418,088
Select Medical Corporation 144A   6.25 8-15-2026     284,000     299,444
Tenet Healthcare Corporation   4.63 7-15-2024     240,000     243,456
              1,947,710
Industrials: 2.30%            
Aerospace & defense: 0.32%            
RBS Global & Rexnord LLC 144A   4.88 12-15-2025     200,000     204,750
Spirit AeroSystems Holdings Incorporated 144A   5.50 1-15-2025     525,000     553,219
                757,969
Airlines: 1.28%            
American Airlines Group Incorporated 144A   5.00 6-1-2022     430,000     428,925
American Airlines Group Incorporated 144A   5.50 4-20-2026     385,000     405,213
Delta Air Lines Incorporated 144A   4.50 10-20-2025   995,000 1,074,352
Hawaiian Airlines Incorporated   3.90 7-15-2027   143,080 138,730
Mileage Plus Holdings LLC 144A   6.50 6-20-2027   850,000 933,130
United Airlines Incorporated 144A   4.38 4-15-2026   90,000 93,263
            3,073,613
Commercial services & supplies: 0.37%            
Corecivic Incorporated   8.25 4-15-2026   200,000 195,120
Covanta Holding Corporation   5.88 7-1-2025   65,000 67,113
Plastipak Holdings Incorporated 144A   6.25 10-15-2025   620,000 634,725
            896,958
Construction & engineering: 0.05%            
Taylor Morrison Communities Incorporated 144A   5.88 4-15-2023   110,000 117,425
Electronic equipment, instruments & components: 0.03%            
Wesco Distribution Incorporated 144A   7.13 6-15-2025   55,000 59,397
Machinery: 0.00%            
Stevens Holding Company Incorporated 144A   6.13 10-1-2026   10,000 10,700
Road & rail: 0.09%            
Uber Technologies Incorporated 144A   8.00 11-1-2026   195,000 210,559
Trading companies & distributors: 0.16%            
Fortress Transportation & Infrastructure Investors LLC 144A   6.50 10-1-2025   358,000 371,425
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

30  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Information technology: 0.60%            
IT services: 0.45%            
Cardtronics Incorporated 144A   5.50% 5-1-2025 $   295,000 $     303,113
Sabre GLBL Incorporated 144A   9.25 4-15-2025     585,000     684,450
Square Incorporated 144A   2.75 6-1-2026      85,000      85,689
              1,073,252
Software: 0.05%            
NortonLifeLock Incorporated 144A   5.00 4-15-2025     120,000     121,284
Technology hardware, storage & peripherals: 0.10%            
Dell International LLC 144A   7.13 6-15-2024     245,000     249,900
Materials: 0.50%            
Chemicals: 0.09%            
Kraton Polymers LLC 144A   4.25 12-15-2025     220,000     222,803
Containers & packaging: 0.11%            
Sealed Air Corporation 144A   5.13 12-1-2024      50,000      54,438
Sealed Air Corporation 144A   5.25 4-1-2023     190,000     200,213
                254,651
Metals & mining: 0.22%            
Cleveland-Cliffs Incorporated 144A   6.75 3-15-2026     195,000     210,594
Cleveland-Cliffs Incorporated 144A   9.88 10-17-2025     274,000     320,595
                531,189
Paper & forest products: 0.08%            
Clearwater Paper Corporation 144A   5.38 2-1-2025     185,000     195,175
Real estate: 0.40%            
Equity REITs: 0.40%            
Service Properties Trust Company   4.35 10-1-2024   500,000 491,123
Service Properties Trust Company   7.50 9-15-2025   420,000 469,486
            960,609
Utilities: 0.39%            
Electric utilities: 0.04%            
NextEra Energy Operating Partners LP 144A   4.25 7-15-2024   100,000 105,950
Independent power & renewable electricity producers: 0.35%            
TerraForm Power Operating LLC 144A   4.25 1-31-2023   600,000 617,580
Vistra Operations Company LLC 144A   5.63 2-15-2027   200,000 207,500
            825,080
Total Corporate bonds and notes (Cost $30,576,823)           31,316,426
Loans: 4.03%            
Communication services: 0.81%            
Entertainment: 0.05%            
Live Nation Entertainment Incorporated (1 Month LIBOR+1.75%) ±   1.88 10-17-2026   124,013 121,006
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio  |  31


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Media: 0.49%            
CSC Holdings LLC (1 Month LIBOR+2.50%) ±   2.60% 4-15-2027 $   366,972 $     364,495
Diamond Sports Group LLC (1 Month LIBOR+3.25%) ±   3.35 8-24-2026     344,750     246,820
Hubbard Radio LLC (3 Month LIBOR+4.25%) ±   5.25 3-28-2025      75,000      73,625
Nexstar Broadcasting Incorporated (1 Month LIBOR+2.50%) ±   2.61 9-18-2026     325,000     323,872
Virgin Media Bristol LLC (1 Month LIBOR+2.50%) ±   2.60 1-31-2028     175,000     173,906
              1,182,718
Wireless telecommunication services: 0.27%            
Consolidated Communications Holdings Incorporated (1 Month LIBOR+3.50%) ±   4.25 10-2-2027     211,000     211,038
SBA Senior Finance II LLC (1 Month LIBOR+1.75%) ±   1.85 4-11-2025     426,404     423,385
                634,423
Consumer discretionary: 0.32%            
Auto components: 0.09%            
Clarios Global LP (1 Month LIBOR+3.25%) ±   3.34 4-30-2026     216,466     215,316
Hotels, restaurants & leisure: 0.12%            
Carnival Corporation (1 Month LIBOR+7.50%) ±   8.50 6-30-2025      49,625      49,790
Carnival Corporation 2021 Term Loan B (1 Month LIBOR+3.75%) <±   3.75 6-30-2025      30,000      30,100
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Incorporated (3 Month LIBOR+1.75%) ±   1.84 5-30-2025     214,500     212,724
                292,614
Specialty retail: 0.11%            
Rent-A-Center Incorporated (1 Month LIBOR+4.00%) ±   4.75 2-17-2028     200,000     201,084
Sally Beauty Holdings Incorporated (3 Month LIBOR+2.25%) ‡±   2.35 7-5-2024      64,064      63,984
                265,068
Consumer staples: 0.04%            
Food products: 0.04%            
Prestige Brands Incorporated (3 Month LIBOR+2.00%) ±   2.09 1-26-2024   90,468 90,581
Energy: 0.16%            
Oil, gas & consumable fuels: 0.16%            
Apergy Corporation (1 Month LIBOR+5.00%) ‡±   6.00 6-3-2027   331,360 337,573
NGPL Holdco LLC (1 Month LIBOR+3.75%) ‡±   4.75 4-14-2028   55,000 55,035
            392,608
Financials: 0.22%            
Diversified financial services: 0.22%            
Delos Finance SARL (3 Month LIBOR+1.75%) ±   1.95 10-6-2023   140,000 139,825
Resolute Investment Managers Incorporated (1 Month LIBOR+3.75%) ‡±   4.75 4-30-2024   105,000 105,131
Russell Investments US Institutional Holdco Incorporated (1 Month LIBOR+3.00%) ±   4.50 5-30-2025   285,000 282,595
            527,551
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

32  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Health care: 0.68%            
Health care equipment & supplies: 0.24%            
Oorth Clinical Diagnistics SA Term Loan (3 Month LIBOR+3.00%) ±   3.11% 6-30-2025 $   220,000 $     220,000
Surgery Center Holdings Incorporated (1 Month LIBOR+3.75%) <±   4.50 8-31-2026     349,509     349,946
                569,946
Health care providers & services: 0.25%            
National Mentor Holdings Incorporated (1 Month LIBOR+3.75%) <±   3.75 3-2-2028       2,836       2,838
National Mentor Holdings Incorporated (1 Month LIBOR+3.75%) <±   4.50 2-18-2028      57,726      57,762
National Mentor Holdings Incorporated (1 Month LIBOR+3.75%) <±   4.50 2-18-2028       1,924       1,925
Select Medical Corporation (3 Month LIBOR+2.25%) ±   2.37 3-6-2025     549,214     544,579
                607,104
Health care technology: 0.04%            
Project Ruby Ultimate Parent Corporation (1 Month LIBOR+3.25%) ±   4.00 3-3-2028      90,000      89,789
Pharmaceuticals: 0.15%            
Bausch Health Companies Incorporated (3 Month LIBOR+3.00%) ±   3.09 6-2-2025     367,701     366,138
Industrials: 0.98%            
Aerospace & defense: 0.10%            
Rexnord LLC (1 Month LIBOR+1.75%) ±   1.84 8-21-2024     156,250     155,998
Spirit AeroSystems Holdings Incorporated (1 Month LIBOR+5.25%) ‡±   6.00 1-15-2025      74,813      75,280
                231,278
Airlines: 0.46%            
AAdvantage American Airlines Incorporated (1 Month LIBOR+4.75%) ±   5.50 4-20-2028     365,000     375,950
JetBlue Airways Corporation (1 Month LIBOR+5.25%) ±   6.25 6-17-2024     207,308     211,800
Mileage Plus Holdings LLC (1 Month LIBOR+5.25%) ±   6.25 6-21-2027     210,000     223,965
SkyMiles IP Limited (3 Month LIBOR+3.75%) ±   4.75 10-20-2027   215,000 225,189
United Airlines Incorporated (1 Month LIBOR+3.75%) ±   4.50 4-21-2028   60,000 60,525
            1,097,429
Building products: 0.09%            
Advanced Drainage Systems Incorporated (1 Month LIBOR+2.25%) ±   2.38 7-31-2026   219,750 220,163
Commercial services & supplies: 0.16%            
Aramark Services Incorporated (1 Month LIBOR+1.75%) ±   1.84 3-11-2025   364,323 359,572
KAR Auction Services Incorporated (1 Month LIBOR+2.25%) ±   2.38 9-19-2026   38,578 37,710
            397,282
Industrial conglomerates: 0.06%            
Werner Finco LP (3 Month LIBOR+4.00%) ‡±   5.00 7-24-2024   134,651 134,651
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio  |  33


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Road & rail: 0.05%            
Uber Technologies Incorporated (1 Month LIBOR+3.50%) ±   3.59% 4-4-2025 $   119,692 $    119,628
Software: 0.06%            
SS&C Technologies Incorporated (1 Month LIBOR+1.75%) <±   1.84 4-16-2025      83,606      82,655
SS&C Technologies Incorporated (1 Month LIBOR+1.75%) ±   1.84 4-16-2025      63,106      62,389
                145,044
Information technology: 0.29%            
Electronic equipment, instruments & components: 0.08%            
CDW LLC (1 Month LIBOR+1.75%) ±   1.85 10-13-2026     193,893     194,136
IT services: 0.08%            
Sabre GLBL Incorporated (1 Month LIBOR+4.00%) ±   4.75 12-17-2027     189,525     190,473
Semiconductors & semiconductor equipment: 0.13%            
ON Semiconductor Corporation (1 Month LIBOR+2.00%) ±   2.09 9-19-2026     310,275     309,800
Materials: 0.44%            
Chemicals: 0.05%            
Ineos US Finance LLC (3 Month LIBOR+2.00%) ±   2.09 4-1-2024     108,270     107,091
Containers & packaging: 0.39%            
Flex Acquisition Company Incorporated (3 Month LIBOR+3.25%) ±   3.45 6-29-2025     180,000     177,899
Flex Acquisition Company Incorporated (1 Month LIBOR+3.50%) ±   4.00 2-23-2028     326,000     324,080
Graham Packaging Company Incorporated (1 Month LIBOR+3.00%) ±   3.75 8-4-2027     220,000     219,850
Reynolds Group Holdings Incorporated (1 Month LIBOR+2.75%) ±   2.84 2-5-2023     215,000     214,432
                936,261
Utilities: 0.09%            
Electric utilities: 0.09%            
ExGen Renewables IV LLC (1 Month LIBOR+2.75%) <±   3.75 12-15-2027   203,975 204,104
Total Loans (Cost $9,748,500)           9,642,202
U.S. Treasury securities: 65.71%            
TIPS   0.13 1-15-2023   3,453,313 3,624,360
TIPS   0.13 7-15-2024   5,013,139 5,450,139
TIPS   0.13 10-15-2024   3,818,992 4,157,288
TIPS   0.13 4-15-2025   3,834,360 4,182,233
TIPS   0.13 10-15-2025   2,020,808 2,223,837
TIPS   0.13 4-15-2026   4,135,090 4,546,700
TIPS   0.13 7-15-2026   3,750,728 4,151,704
TIPS   0.13 1-15-2030   4,322,976 4,754,956
TIPS   0.13 7-15-2030   5,422,515 5,986,870
TIPS   0.13 1-15-2031   3,062,043 3,360,188
TIPS   0.13 2-15-2051   1,022,236 1,072,455
TIPS   0.25 1-15-2025   4,639,949 5,073,123
TIPS   0.25 7-15-2029   3,488,894 3,895,676
TIPS   0.25 2-15-2050   1,771,669 1,920,914
TIPS   0.38 7-15-2023   4,750,858 5,092,294
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

34  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
U.S. Treasury securities (continued)            
TIPS   0.38% 7-15-2025 $ 6,275,798 $   6,972,728
TIPS   0.38 1-15-2027   6,857,231   7,667,185
TIPS   0.38 7-15-2027   3,572,481   4,021,999
TIPS   0.50 4-15-2024   3,270,719   3,557,204
TIPS   0.50 1-15-2028   4,042,066   4,568,503
TIPS   0.63 4-15-2023   4,211,214   4,482,259
TIPS   0.63 1-15-2024   5,135,604   5,580,299
TIPS   0.63 1-15-2026   5,511,203   6,190,926
TIPS   0.63 2-15-2043   2,113,590   2,459,208
TIPS   0.75 7-15-2028   3,597,482   4,154,252
TIPS   0.75 2-15-2042   2,853,723   3,398,979
TIPS   0.75 2-15-2045   2,558,420   3,057,680
TIPS   0.88 1-15-2029   2,957,531   3,441,533
TIPS   0.88 2-15-2047   1,618,134   2,009,521
TIPS   1.00 2-15-2046   1,598,211   2,022,115
TIPS   1.00 2-15-2048   1,229,604   1,581,628
TIPS   1.00 2-15-2049   1,404,927   1,819,729
TIPS   1.38 2-15-2044   2,306,628   3,100,593
TIPS   1.75 1-15-2028   2,420,675   2,950,948
TIPS   2.00 1-15-2026   3,002,040   3,574,607
TIPS   2.13 2-15-2040   1,274,218   1,873,444
TIPS   2.13 2-15-2041   1,626,455   2,412,559
TIPS   2.38 1-15-2025   3,090,758   3,632,913
TIPS   2.38 1-15-2027   2,225,806 2,758,316
TIPS   2.50 1-15-2029   2,331,183 3,021,827
TIPS   3.38 4-15-2032   939,916 1,390,220
TIPS   3.63 4-15-2028   1,891,082 2,572,456
TIPS   3.88 4-15-2029   2,480,740 3,511,645
Total U.S. Treasury securities (Cost $142,978,540)           157,278,013
Yankee corporate bonds and notes: 1.12%            
Communication services: 0.19%            
Media: 0.19%            
Nielsen Holding and Finance BV 144A   5.00 2-1-2025   65,000 66,788
Videotron Limited   5.00 7-15-2022   375,000 389,063
            455,851
Consumer staples: 0.07%            
Food products: 0.07%            
Cooke Omega Investments Incorporated 144A   8.50 12-15-2022   165,000 169,538
Energy: 0.18%            
Oil, gas & consumable fuels: 0.18%            
Northriver Midstream Finance LP 144A   5.63 2-15-2026   425,000 436,798
Financials: 0.16%            
Diversified financial services: 0.16%            
DAE Funding LLC 144A   2.63 3-20-2025   370,000 373,789
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio  |  35


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

    Interest
rate
Maturity
date
Principal Value
Health care: 0.16%            
Pharmaceuticals: 0.16%            
Teva Pharmaceutical Finance BV   2.80% 7-21-2023 $   310,000 $     307,094
Teva Pharmaceutical Finance BV   3.65 11-10-2021      70,000      70,350
                377,444
Industrials: 0.10%            
Trading companies & distributors: 0.10%            
FLY Leasing Limited   5.25 10-15-2024     225,000     229,781
Materials: 0.26%            
Chemicals: 0.16%            
Park Aerospace Holdings Company 144A   5.50 2-15-2024     345,000     379,167
Metals & mining: 0.10%            
Constellium NV Company 144A   5.75 5-15-2024     250,000     252,750
Total Yankee corporate bonds and notes (Cost $2,571,448)             2,675,118
    
    Yield   Shares  
Short-term investments: 0.95%            
Investment companies: 0.95%            
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class ♠∞   0.03     2,265,095   2,265,095
Total Short-term investments (Cost $2,265,095)             2,265,095
Total investments in securities (Cost $213,104,277) 99.63%         238,447,562
Other assets and liabilities, net 0.37             894,378
Total net assets 100.00%         $239,341,940
    
Non-income-earning security
144A The security may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers, pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933.
± Variable rate investment. The rate shown is the rate in effect at period end.
< All or a portion of the position represents an unfunded loan commitment. The rate represents current interest rate if the loan is partially funded.
Security is valued using significant unobservable inputs.
The issuer is an affiliate of the Portfolio as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The rate represents the 7-day annualized yield at period end.
    
Abbreviations:
ADR American depositary receipt
LIBOR London Interbank Offered Rate
REIT Real estate investment trust
TIPS Treasury inflation-protected securities
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

36  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021

Investments in affiliates
An affiliated investment is an investment in which the Portfolio owns at least 5% of the outstanding voting shares of the issuer or as a result of other relationships, such as the Portfolio and the issuer having the same adviser or investment manager. Transactions with issuers that were either affiliates of the Portfolio at the beginning of the period or the end of the period were as follows:
  Value,
beginning of
period
Purchases Sales
proceeds
Net
realized
gains
(losses)
  Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses)
  Value,
end of
period
  % of
net
assets
Shares,
end
of period
Income
from
affiliated
securities
Short-term investments                        
Investment companies                        
Securities Lending Cash Investments LLC $ 0 $ 2,733,330 $ (2,733,330) $0   $0   $ 0     0 $ 80#
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class 923,723 103,021,863 (101,680,491) 0   0   2,265,095     2,265,095 1,437
        $0   $0   $2,265,095   0.95%   $1,517
    
# Amount shown represents income before fees and rebates.
Futures contracts
Description Number of
contracts
Expiration
date
Notional
cost
Notional
value
Unrealized
gains
  Unrealized
losses
Long              
2-Year U.S. Treasury Notes 14 9-30-2021 $ 3,089,647 $ 3,090,281 $ 634   $0
Short              
10-Year U.S. Treasury Notes (5) 9-21-2021 (660,343) (659,688) 655   0
10-Year Ultra Futures (3) 9-21-2021 (435,678) (434,859) 819   0
U.S. Ultra Bond (13) 9-21-2021 (2,413,516) (2,408,250) 5,266   0
5-Year U.S. Treasury Notes (63) 9-30-2021 (7,803,532) (7,802,648) 884   0
          $8,258   $0
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio  |  37


Statement of assets and liabilities—May 31, 2021
   
Assets  
Investments in unaffiliated securities, at value (cost $210,839,182)

$ 236,182,467
Investments in affiliated securites, at value (cost $2,265,095)

2,265,095
Cash at broker segregated for futures contracts

226,000
Foreign currency, at value (cost $5,575)

5,558
Receivable for dividends and interest

893,553
Receivable for investments sold

6,279
Prepaid expenses and other assets

61,520
Total assets

239,640,472
Liabilities  
Payable for investments purchased

217,490
Advisory fee payable

66,529
Payable for daily variation margin on open futures contracts

14,031
Overdraft due to custodian bank

482
Total liabilities

298,532
Total net assets

$239,341,940
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

38  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio


Statement of operations—year ended May 31, 2021
   
Investment income  
Interest

$ 5,388,000
Dividends (net of foreign withholdings taxes of $1,247)

648,488
Income from affiliated securities

2,120
Total investment income

6,038,608
Expenses  
Advisory fee

816,193
Custody and accounting fees

28,353
Professional fees

50,123
Interest holder report expenses

15,470
Trustees’ fees and expenses

19,326
Other fees and expenses

20,674
Total expenses

950,139
Less: Fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements

(154,351)
Net expenses

795,788
Net investment income

5,242,820
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments  
Net realized gains on  
Unaffiliated securities

548,904
Futures contracts

310,755
Net realized gains on investments

859,659
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on  
Unaffiliated securities

12,442,030
Futures contracts

41,150
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

12,483,180
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

13,342,839
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

$18,585,659
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio  |  39


Statement of changes in net assets
     
  Year ended
May 31, 2021
Year ended
May 31, 2020
Operations    
Net investment income

$ 5,242,820 $ 3,780,486
Net realized gains (losses) on investments

859,659 (2,934,511)
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

12,483,180 8,799,280
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

18,585,659 9,645,255
Capital transactions    
Transactions in investors’ beneficial interests    
Contributions

97,022,259 25,838,830
Withdrawals

(38,320,850) (56,167,504)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from capital transactions

58,701,409 (30,328,674)
Total increase (decrease) in net assets

77,287,068 (20,683,419)
Net assets    
Beginning of period

162,054,872 182,738,291
End of period

$239,341,940 $162,054,872
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

40  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio


Financial highlights
  Year ended May 31
  2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Total return

9.58% 5.92% 2.99% 1.67% 2.65%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)          
Gross expenses

0.47% 0.45% 0.45% 0.48% 0.52%
Net expenses1

0.39% 0.39% 0.40% 0.41% 0.44%
Net investment income

2.57% 2.16% 2.29% 2.40% 2.36%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate

20% 24% 39% 29% 25%
    
1 Net expense ratios reflect voluntary waivers.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio  |  41


Notes to financial statements
1. ORGANIZATION
Wells Fargo Master Trust (the "Trust"), a Delaware statutory trust organized on March 10, 1999, is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). As an investment company, the Trust follows the accounting and reporting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, Financial Services – Investment Companies. These financial statements report on the Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio (the "Portfolio") which is a diversified series of the Trust.
Interests in the Portfolio are available solely through private placement transactions that do not involve any "public offering" within the meaning of Section 4(2) of the Investment Company Act of 1933.
On February 23, 2021, Wells Fargo & Company announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management ("WFAM") to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. WFAM is the trade name used by the asset management businesses of Wells Fargo & Company and includes Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the adviser to the Portfolio, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, both registered investment advisers providing sub-advisory services to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Portfolio's principal underwriter. As part of the transaction, Wells Fargo & Company will own a 9.9% equity interest and will continue to serve as an important client and distribution partner.
Consummation of the transaction will result in the automatic termination of the Portfolio's advisory agreement and subadvisory agreement. The Portfolio's Board of Trustees approved a new advisory and new subadvisory agreement and approved submitting the agreements to the Portfolio’s interest holders for approval at a special meeting of interest holders expected to be held on August 16, 2021. Interest holders of record of the Portfolio at the close of business on May 28, 2021 are entitled to vote at the meeting. If interest holders approve the new agreements, they would take effect upon the closing of the transaction. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following significant accounting policies, which are consistently followed in the preparation of the financial statements of the Portfolio, are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Securities valuation
All investments are valued each business day as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4 p.m. Eastern Time), although the Portfolio may deviate from this calculation time under unusual or unexpected circumstances.
Debt securities are valued at the evaluated bid price provided by an independent pricing service (e.g. taking into account various factors, including yields, maturities, or credit ratings) or, if a reliable price is not available, the quoted bid price from an independent broker-dealer.
Equity securities and futures contracts that are listed on a foreign or domestic exchange or market are valued at the official closing price or, if none, the last sales price. If no sale occurs on the principal exchange or market that day, a fair value price will be determined in accordance with the Portfolio’s Valuation Procedures.
The values of securities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at rates provided by an independent foreign currency pricing source at a time each business day specified by the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee at Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC ("Funds Management").
Many securities markets and exchanges outside the U.S. close prior to the close of the New York Stock Exchange and therefore may not fully reflect trading or events that occur after the close of the principal exchange in which the foreign securities are traded, but before the close of the New York Stock Exchange. If such trading or events are expected to materially affect the value of such securities, then fair value pricing procedures approved by the Board of Trustees of the Portfolio are applied. These procedures take into account multiple factors including movements in U.S. securities markets after foreign exchanges close. Foreign securities that are fair valued under these procedures are categorized as Level 2 and the application of these procedures may result in transfers between Level 1 and Level 2. Depending on market activity, such fair valuations may be frequent. Such fair value pricing may result in net asset values that are higher or lower than net asset values based on the last reported sales price or latest quoted bid price. On May 31, 2021, such fair value pricing was not used in pricing foreign securities.

42  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio


Notes to financial statements
Investments in registered open-end investment companies are valued at net asset value. Interests in non-registered investment companies that are redeemable at net asset value are fair valued normally at net asset value.
Investments which are not valued using any of the methods discussed above are valued at their fair value, as determined in good faith by the Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees has established a Valuation Committee comprised of the Trustees and has delegated to it the authority to take any actions regarding the valuation of portfolio securities that the Valuation Committee deems necessary or appropriate, including determining the fair value of portfolio securities, unless the determination has been delegated to the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee. The Board of Trustees retains the authority to make or ratify any valuation decisions or approve any changes to the Valuation Procedures as it deems appropriate. On a quarterly basis, the Board of Trustees receives reports on any valuation actions taken by the Valuation Committee or the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee which may include items for ratification.
Foreign currency translation
The accounting records of the Portfolio are maintained in U.S. dollars. The values of other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at rates provided by an independent foreign currency pricing source at a time each business day specified by the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee. Purchases and sales of securities, and income and expenses are converted at the rate of exchange on the respective dates of such transactions. Net realized foreign exchange gains or losses arise from sales of foreign currencies, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest and foreign withholding taxes recorded and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually paid or received. Net unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses arise from changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities other than investments in securities resulting from changes in exchange rates. The changes in net assets arising from changes in exchange rates of securities and the changes in net assets resulting from changes in market prices of securities are not separately presented. Such changes are included in net realized and unrealized gains or losses from investments.
Securities lending
The Portfolio may lend its securities from time to time in order to earn additional income in the form of fees or interest on securities received as collateral or the investment of any cash received as collateral. When securities are on loan, the Portfolio receives interest or dividends on those securities. Cash collateral received in connection with its securities lending transactions is invested in Securities Lending Cash Investments, LLC (the “Securities Lending Fund”). Investments in Securities Lending Fund are valued at the evaluated bid price provided by an independent pricing service. Income earned from investment in the Securities Lending Fund (net of fees and rebates), if any, is included in income from affiliated securities on the Statement of Operations.
In a securities lending transaction, the net asset value of the Portfolio is affected by an increase or decrease in the value of the securities loaned and by an increase or decrease in the value of the instrument in which collateral is invested. The amount of securities lending activity undertaken by the Portfolio fluctuates from time to time. The Portfolio has the right under the lending agreement to recover the securities from the borrower on demand. In the event of default or bankruptcy by the borrower, the Portfolio may be prevented from recovering the loaned securities or gaining access to the collateral or may experience delays or costs in doing so. In such an event, the terms of the agreement allow the unaffiliated securities lending agent to use the collateral to purchase replacement securities on behalf of the Portfolio or pay the Portfolio the market value of the loaned securities. The Portfolio bears the risk of loss with respect to depreciation of its investment of the cash collateral.
When-issued transactions
The Portfolio may purchase securities on a forward commitment or when-issued basis. The Portfolio records a when-issued transaction on the trade date and will segregate assets in an amount at least equal in value to the Portfolio's commitment to purchase when-issued securities. Securities purchased on a when-issued basis are marked-to-market daily and the Portfolio begins earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may arise due to changes in the market value of the underlying securities or if the counterparty does not perform under the contract.
Loans
The Portfolio may invest in direct debt instruments which are interests in amounts owed to lenders by corporate or other borrowers. The loans pay interest at rates which are periodically reset by reference to a base lending rate plus a spread. Investments in loans may be in the form of participations in loans or assignments of all or a portion of loans from third parties. When the Portfolio purchases participations, it generally has no rights to enforce compliance with the terms of the loan agreement with the borrower. As a result, the Portfolio assumes the credit risk of both the borrower and the lender that is selling the participation. When the Portfolio purchases assignments from lenders, it acquires direct rights against the borrower

Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio  |  43


Notes to financial statements
on the loan and may enforce compliance by the borrower with the terms of the loan agreement. Loans may include fully funded term loans or unfunded loan commitments, which are contractual obligations for future funding.
Futures contracts
Futures contracts are agreements between the Portfolio and a counterparty to buy or sell a specific amount of a commodity, financial instrument or currency at a specified price on a specified date. The Portfolio may buy and sell futures contracts in order to gain exposure to, or protect against, changes in interest rates and is subject to interest rate risk. The primary risks associated with the use of futures contracts are the imperfect correlation between changes in market values of securities held by the Portfolio and the prices of futures contracts, and the possibility of an illiquid market. Futures contracts are generally entered into on a regulated futures exchange and cleared through a clearinghouse associated with the exchange. With futures contracts, there is minimal counterparty risk to the Portfolio since futures contracts are exchange traded and the exchange’s clearinghouse, as the counterparty to all exchange traded futures, guarantees the futures contracts against default.
Upon entering into a futures contract, the Portfolio is required to deposit either cash or securities (initial margin) with the broker in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the contract value. Subsequent payments (variation margin) are paid to or from the broker each day equal to the daily changes in the contract value. Such payments are recorded as unrealized gains or losses and, if any, shown as variation margin receivable (payable) in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Should the Portfolio fail to make requested variation margin payments, the broker can gain access to the initial margin to satisfy the Portfolio’s payment obligations. When the contracts are closed, a realized gain or loss is recorded in the Statement of Operations.
Inflation-indexed bonds and TIPS
The Portfolio may invest in inflation-indexed bonds, including Treasury inflation-protected securities (TIPS). Inflation-indexed bonds are fixed income securities whose principal value is periodically adjusted according to the rate of inflation. If the index measuring inflation falls, the principal value of inflation-indexed bonds (other than municipal inflation-indexed bonds and certain corporate inflation-indexed bonds) will be adjusted downward, and consequently the interest payable on these securities (calculated with respect to a smaller principal amount) will be reduced. Repayment of the original bond principal upon maturity (as adjusted for inflation) is guaranteed in the case of U.S. Treasury inflation-indexed bonds. For bonds that do not provide a similar guarantee, the adjusted principal value of the bond repaid at maturity may be less than the original principal. The value of inflation-indexed bonds is expected to change in response to changes in real interest rates. Real interest rates are tied to the relationship between nominal interest rates and the rate of inflation. If nominal interest rates increase at a faster rate than inflation, real interest rates may rise, leading to a decrease in value of inflation-indexed bonds. Inflation-indexed bonds, including TIPS, decline in value when real interest rates rise. In certain interest rate environments, such as when real interest rates are rising faster than nominal interest rates, inflation-indexed bonds may experience greater losses than other fixed income securities with similar durations.
Security transactions and income recognition
Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains or losses are recorded on the basis of identified cost.
Interest income is accrued daily and bond discounts are accreted and premiums are amortized daily. To the extent debt obligations are placed on non-accrual status, any related interest income may be reduced by writing off interest receivables when the collection of all or a portion of interest has been determined to be doubtful based on consistently applied procedures and the fair value has decreased. If the issuer subsequently resumes interest payments or when the collectability of interest is reasonably assured, the debt obligation is removed from non-accrual status. Paydown gains and losses are included in interest income.
Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date, except for certain dividends from foreign securities, which are recorded as soon as the custodian verifies the ex-dividend date.
Income is recorded net of foreign taxes withheld where recovery of such taxes is not assured.
Federal and other taxes
The Portfolio is not required to pay federal income taxes on its net investment income and net capital gains as it is treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. All income, gains and losses of the Portfolio are deemed to have been “passed through” to the interest holders in proportion to their holdings of the Portfolio regardless of whether income and gains have been distributed by the Portfolio.
The Portfolio’s income tax returns and all financial records supporting those returns for the prior three fiscal years are subject to examination by the federal revenue authority. Management has analyzed the Portfolio’s tax positions taken on federal, state, and foreign tax returns for all open tax years and does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability.

44  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio


Notes to financial statements
As of May 31, 2021, the aggregate cost of all investments for federal income tax purposes was $213,527,256 and the unrealized gains (losses) consisted of:
Gross unrealized gains $25,689,124
Gross unrealized losses (760,560)
Net unrealized gains $24,928,564
3. FAIR VALUATION MEASUREMENTS
Fair value measurements of investments are determined within a framework that has established a fair value hierarchy based upon the various data inputs utilized in determining the value of the Portfolio’s investments. The three-level hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The Portfolio’s investments are classified within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The inputs are summarized into three broad levels as follows:
Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical securities
Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Portfolio’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs or methodologies used for valuing investments in securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s assets and liabilities as of May 31, 2021:
  Quoted prices
(Level 1)
Other significant
observable inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
unobservable inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Assets        
Investments in:        
Common stocks        
Consumer staples $ 10,753,488 $ 0 $ 0 $ 10,753,488
Energy 2,914,496 0 0 2,914,496
Materials 9,523,751 0 0 9,523,751
Real estate 12,078,973 0 0 12,078,973
Corporate bonds and notes 0 31,316,426 0 31,316,426
Loans 0 8,870,548 771,654 9,642,202
U.S. Treasury securities 157,278,013 0 0 157,278,013
Yankee corporate bonds and notes 0 2,675,118 0 2,675,118
Short-term investments        
Investment companies 2,265,095 0 0 2,265,095
  194,813,816 42,862,092 771,654 238,447,562
Futures contracts 8,258 0 0 8,258
Total assets $194,822,074 $42,862,092 $771,654 $238,455,820
Futures contracts are reported at their cumulative unrealized gains (losses) at measurement date as reported in the table following the Portfolio of Investments. For futures contracts, the current day’s variation margin is reported on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. All other assets and liabilities are reported at their market value at measurement date.
Additional sector, industry or geographic detail, if any, is included in the Portfolio of Investments.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the Portfolio did not have any transfers into/out of Level 3.

Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio  |  45


Notes to financial statements
4. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
Advisory fee
The Trust has entered into an advisory contract with Funds Management, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company ("Wells Fargo"). The adviser is responsible for implementing investment policies and guidelines and for supervising the subadviser, who is responsible for day-to-day portfolio management of the Portfolio. Pursuant to the contract, Funds Management is entitled to receive an advisory fee at the following annual rate based on the Portfolio’s average daily net assets:
Average daily net assets Advisory fee
First $500 million 0.400%
Next $500 million 0.375
Next $2 billion 0.350
Next $2 billion 0.325
Next $5 billion 0.300
Over $10 billion 0.290
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the advisory fee was equivalent to an annual rate of 0.40% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets.
Funds Management has retained the services of a subadviser to provide daily portfolio management to the Portfolio. The fee for subadvisory services is borne by Funds Management. Wells Capital Management Incorporated ("WellsCap"), an affiliate of Funds Management and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo, is the subadviser to the Portfolio and is entitled to receive a fee from Funds Management at an annual rate starting at 0.28% and declining to 0.18% as the average daily net assets of the Portfolio increase.
Funds Management has voluntarily waived and/or reimbursed advisory fees to reduce the net operating expense ratio of the Portfolio. These voluntary waivers may be discontinued at any time.
Interfund transactions
The Portfolio may purchase or sell portfolio investment securities to certain other Wells Fargo affiliates pursuant to Rule 17a-7 under the 1940 Act and under procedures adopted by the Board of Trustees. The procedures have been designed to ensure that these interfund transactions, which do not incur broker commissions, are effected at current market prices. Pursuant to these procedures, the Fund had $4,941,269, $0 and $0 in interfund purchases, sales and net realized gains (losses), respectively, during the year ended May 31, 2021.
5. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS
Purchases and sales of investments, excluding short-term securities, for the year ended May 31, 2021 were as follows:
Purchases at cost   Sales proceeds
U.S.
government
Non-U.S.
government
  U.S.
government
Non-U.S.
government
$50,723,683 $54,063,422   $10,151,765 $30,156,667
As of May 31, 2021, the Portfolio had unfunded loan commitments of $217,486.
6. SECURITIES LENDING TRANSACTIONS
The Portfolio lends its securities through an unaffiliated securities lending agent and receives collateral in the form of cash or securities with a value at least equal to the value of the securities on loan. The value of the loaned securities is determined at the close of each business day and any increases or decreases in the required collateral are exchanged between the Portfolio and the counterparty on the next business day. Cash collateral received is invested in the Securities Lending Fund which seeks to provide a positive return compared to the daily Federal Funds Open Rate by investing in high-quality, U.S. dollar-denominated short-term money market instruments and is exempt from registration under Section 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act. Securities Lending Fund is managed by Funds Management and is subadvised by WellsCap. Funds Management receives an

46  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio


Notes to financial statements
advisory fee starting at 0.05% and declining to 0.01% as the average daily net assets of the Securities Lending Fund increase. All of the fees received by Funds Management are paid to WellsCap for its services as subadviser.
In the event of counterparty default or the failure of a borrower to return a loaned security, the Portfolio has the right to use the collateral to offset any losses incurred. As of May 31, 2021, the Portfolio did not have any securities on loan.
7. DERIVATIVE TRANSACTIONS
During the year ended May 31, 2021, the Portfolio entered into futures contracts to speculate on interest rates and to help manage the duration of the portfolio. The Portfolio had an average notional amount of $3,100,271 in long futures contracts and $11,323,497 in short futures contracts during the year ended May 31, 2021.
The fair value, realized gains or losses and change in unrealized gains or losses, if any, on derivative instruments are reflected in the corresponding financial statement captions.
8. BANK BORROWINGS
The Trust, along with Wells Fargo Variable Trust and Wells Fargo Funds Trust (excluding the money market funds), are parties to a $350,000,000 revolving credit agreement whereby the Portfolio is permitted to use bank borrowings for temporary or emergency purposes, such as to fund interest holders withdrawal requests. Interest under the credit agreement is charged to the Portfolio based on a borrowing rate equal to the higher of the Federal Funds rate in effect on that day plus 1.25% or the overnight LIBOR rate in effect on that day plus 1.25%. In addition, an annual commitment fee equal to 0.25% of the unused balance is allocated to each participating fund.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, there were no borrowings by the Portfolio under the agreement.
9. INDEMNIFICATION
Under the Portfolio's organizational documents, the officers and Trustees have been granted certain indemnification rights against certain liabilities that may arise out of performance of their duties to the Portfolio. The Portfolio has entered into a separate agreement with each Trustee that converts indemnification rights currently existing under the Portfolio’s organizational documents into contractual rights that cannot be changed in the future without the consent of the Trustee. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Portfolio may enter into contracts with service providers that contain a variety of indemnification clauses. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent on future claims that may be made against the Portfolio and, therefore, cannot be estimated.
10. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
In August 2018, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 updates the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Management has adopted this guidance which did not have a material impact on the financial statements.
11. CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization announced that it had made the assessment that coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) is a pandemic. The impacts of COVID-19 are affecting the entire global economy, individual companies and investment products, the funds, and the market in general. There is significant uncertainty around the extent and duration of business disruptions related to COVID-19 and the impacts may last for an extended period of time. COVID-19 has led to significant uncertainty and volatility in the financial markets.
12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
At a meeting held July 15, 2021, the Board of Trustees of the Wells Fargo Funds approved a change in the Portfolio's name to remove “Wells Fargo” from the Portfolio's name and replace with “Allspring”. The change is expected to go into effect on October 11, 2021.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) announced that it will be changing its company name to Allspring Global Investments upon the closing of the previously announced sale transaction of WFAM by Wells Fargo & Company to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. The new corporate name is expected to go into effect on the closing date of the transaction, which is anticipated to occur in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.

Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio  |  47


Notes to financial statements
Following the closing of the transaction, Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the Portfolio's investment adviser, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, each sub-advisers to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC will each be rebranded as Allspring.

48  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio


Report of independent registered public accounting firm
To the Interest Holders of the Portfolio and Board of Trustees
Wells Fargo Master Trust:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio (the Portfolio), one of the portfolios constituting Wells Fargo Master Trust, including the portfolio of investments, as of May 31, 2021, the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the financial statements) and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Portfolio as of May 31, 2021, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Portfolio in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and financial highlights, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. Such procedures also included confirmation of securities owned as of May 31, 2021, by correspondence with the custodian, transfer agent, agent banks and brokers, or by other appropriate auditing procedures. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and financial highlights. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have not been able to determine the specific year that we began serving as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies; however, we are aware that we have served as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies since at least 1955.
Boston, Massachusetts
July 28, 2021

Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio  |  49


Other information (unaudited)
TAX INFORMATION
For corporate shareholders, pursuant to Section 854 of the Internal Revenue Code, 8% of ordinary income dividends qualify for the corporate dividends-received deduction for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 854 of the Internal Revenue Code, $118,674 of income dividends paid during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 has been designated as qualified dividend income (QDI).
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, $1,231,500 has been designated as interest-related dividends for nonresident alien shareholders pursuant to Section 871 of the Internal Revenue Code.
For corporate shareholders, pursuant to Section 163(j) of the Internal Revenue Code, 89% of ordinary income dividends qualify as interest dividends for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021.
PROXY VOTING INFORMATION
A description of the policies and procedures used to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-222-8222, visiting our website at wfam.com, or visiting the SEC website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the proxies related to portfolio securities were voted during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the website at wfam.com or by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS INFORMATION
The Fund and Portfolio file their complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year as an exhibit to their reports on Form N-PORT. Shareholders and Interest holders may view the filed Form N-PORT by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov.

50  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Fund


Other information (unaudited)
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS
Each of the Trustees and Officers listed in the table below acts in identical capacities for each fund in the Wells Fargo family of funds, which consists of 139 mutual funds comprising the Wells Fargo Funds Trust, Wells Fargo Variable Trust, Wells Fargo Master Trust and four closed-end funds (collectively the “Fund Complex”). This table should be read in conjunction with the Prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information1. The mailing address of each Trustee and Officer is 525 Market Street, 12th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105. Each Trustee and Officer serves an indefinite term, however, each Trustee serves such term until reaching the mandatory retirement age established by the Trustees.
Independent Trustees
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service*
Principal occupations during past five years or longer Current other
public company or
investment
company
directorships
William R. Ebsworth
(Born 1957)
Trustee,
since 2015
Retired. From 1984 to 2013, equities analyst, portfolio manager, research director and chief investment officer at Fidelity Management and Research Company in Boston, Tokyo, and Hong Kong, and retired in 2013 as Chief Investment Officer of Fidelity Strategic Advisers, Inc. where he led a team of investment professionals managing client assets. Prior thereto, Board member of Hong Kong Securities Clearing Co., Hong Kong Options Clearing Corp., the Thailand International Fund, Ltd., Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company, and Empire Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company. Audit Committee Chair and Investment Committee Chair of the Vincent Memorial Hospital Endowment (non-profit organization). Mr. Ebsworth is a CFA® charterholder. N/A
Jane A. Freeman
(Born 1953)
Trustee,
since 2015;
Chair Liaison,
since 2018
Retired. From 2012 to 2014 and 1999 to 2008, Chief Financial Officer of Scientific Learning Corporation. From 2008 to 2012, Ms. Freeman provided consulting services related to strategic business projects. Prior to 1999, Portfolio Manager at Rockefeller & Co. and Scudder, Stevens & Clark. Board member of the Harding Loevner Funds from 1996 to 2014, serving as both Lead Independent Director and chair of the Audit Committee. Board member of the Russell Exchange Traded Funds Trust from 2011 to 2012 and the chair of the Audit Committee. Ms. Freeman is also an inactive Chartered Financial Analyst. N/A
Isaiah Harris, Jr.
(Born 1952)
Trustee,
since 2009; Audit
Committee
Chair,
since 2019
Retired. Chairman of the Board of CIGNA Corporation since 2009, and Director since 2005. From 2003 to 2011, Director of Deluxe Corporation. Prior thereto, President and CEO of BellSouth Advertising and Publishing Corp. from 2005 to 2007, President and CEO of BellSouth Enterprises from 2004 to 2005 and President of BellSouth Consumer Services from 2000 to 2003. Emeritus member of the Iowa State University Foundation Board of Governors. Emeritus Member of the Advisory Board of Iowa State University School of Business. Advisory Board Member, Palm Harbor Academy (private school). Mr. Harris is a certified public accountant (inactive status). CIGNA Corporation
Judith M. Johnson
(Born 1949)
Trustee,
since 2008
Retired. Prior thereto, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund from 1996 to 2008. Ms. Johnson is an attorney, certified public accountant and a certified managerial accountant. N/A
David F. Larcker
(Born 1950)
Trustee,
since 2009
James Irvin Miller Professor of Accounting at the Graduate School of Business (Emeritus), Stanford University, Director of the Corporate Governance Research Initiative and Senior Faculty of The Rock Center for Corporate Governance since 2006. From 2005 to 2008, Professor of Accounting at the Graduate School of Business, Stanford University. Prior thereto, Ernst & Young Professor of Accounting at The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania from 1985 to 2005. N/A

Wells Fargo Real Return Fund  |  51


Other information (unaudited)
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service*
Principal occupations during past five years or longer Current other
public company or
investment
company
directorships
Olivia S. Mitchell
(Born 1953)
Trustee,
since 2006;
Nominating and
Governance
Committee Chair,
since 2018
International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans Professor, Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania since 1993. Director of Wharton’s Pension Research Council and Boettner Center on Pensions & Retirement Research, and Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. Previously, Cornell University Professor from 1978 to 1993. N/A
Timothy J. Penny
(Born 1951)
Trustee,
since 1996;
Chair,
since 2018
President and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Minnesota Initiative Foundation, a non-profit organization, since 2007. Member of the Board of Trustees of NorthStar Education Finance, Inc., a non-profit organization, since 2007. N/A
James G. Polisson
(Born 1959)
Trustee,
since 2018
Retired. Chief Marketing Officer, Source (ETF) UK Services, Ltd, from 2015 to 2017. From 2012 to 2015, Principal of The Polisson Group, LLC, a management consulting, corporate advisory and principal investing company. Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director at Russell Investments, Global Exchange Traded Funds from 2010 to 2012. Managing Director of Barclays Global Investors from 1998 to 2010 and Global Chief Marketing Officer for iShares and Barclays Global Investors from 2000 to 2010. Trustee of the San Francisco Mechanics’ Institute, a non-profit organization, from 2013 to 2015. Board member of the Russell Exchange Traded Fund Trust from 2011 to 2012. Director of Barclays Global Investors Holdings Deutschland GmbH from 2006 to 2009. Mr. Polisson is an attorney and has a retired status with the Massachusetts and District of Columbia Bar Associations. N/A
Pamela Wheelock
(Born 1959)
Trustee,
since January
2020; previously
Trustee from
January 2018 to
July 2019
Board member of the Destination Medical Center Economic Development Agency, Rochester, Minnesota since 2019. Interim President of the McKnight Foundation from January to September 2020. Acting Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Human Services, July 2019 through September 2019. Human Services Manager (part-time), Minnesota Department of Human Services, October 2019 through December 2019. Chief Operating Officer, Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity from 2017 to 2019. Vice President of University Services, University of Minnesota from 2012 to 2016. Prior thereto, on the Board of Directors, Governance Committee and Finance Committee for the Minnesota Philanthropy Partners (Saint Paul Foundation) from 2012 to 2018, Interim Chief Executive Officer of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota from 2011 to 2012, Chairman of the Board from 2009 to 2012 and Board Director from 2003 to 2015. Vice President, Leadership and Community Engagement, Bush Foundation, Saint Paul, Minnesota (a private foundation) from 2009 to 2011. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Minnesota Sports and Entertainment from 2004 to 2009 and Senior Vice President from 2002 to 2004. Executive Vice President of the Minnesota Wild Foundation from 2004 to 2008. Commissioner of Finance, State of Minnesota, from 1999 to 2002. Currently Board Chair of the Minnesota Wild Foundation since 2010. N/A
*  Length of service dates reflect the Trustee’s commencement of service with the Trust’s predecessor entities, where applicable.

52  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Fund


Other information (unaudited)
Officers
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service
Principal occupations during past five years or longer
Andrew Owen
(Born 1960)
President,
since 2017
Executive Vice President of Wells Fargo & Company and Head of Affiliated Managers, Wells Fargo Asset Management, since 2014. In addition, Mr. Owen is currently President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC since 2017. Prior thereto, Executive Vice President responsible for marketing, investments and product development for Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, from 2009 to 2014.
Jeremy DePalma
(Born 1974)
Treasurer,
since 2012
(for certain funds in
the Fund Complex);
since 2021 (for
the remaining funds in the
Fund Complex)
Senior Vice President of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC since 2009. Senior Vice President of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC from 2008 to 2010 and head of the Fund Reporting and Control Team within Fund Administration from 2005 to 2010.
Michelle Rhee
(Born 1966)
Chief Legal Officer,
since 2019
Secretary of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC and Chief Legal Counsel of Wells Fargo Asset Management since 2018. Deputy General Counsel of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. since 2020 and Assistant General Counsel of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. from 2018 to 2020. Associate General Counsel and Managing Director of Bank of America Corporation from 2004 to 2018.
Catherine Kennedy
(Born 1969)
Secretary,
since 2019
Vice President of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC and Senior Counsel of the Wells Fargo Legal Department since 2010. Vice President and Senior Counsel of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC from 1998 to 2010.
Michael H. Whitaker
(Born 1967)
Chief Compliance Officer,
since 2016
Chief Compliance Officer of Wells Fargo Asset Management since 2016. Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer for Fidelity Investments from 2007 to 2016.
1  The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about the Trustees and is available, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-222-8222 or by visiting the website at wfam.com.

Wells Fargo Real Return Fund  |  53


Other information (unaudited)
LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
In accordance with Rule 22e-4 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Liquidity Rule”), Wells Fargo Funds Trust and Wells Fargo Master Trust (each a “Trust”) has adopted and implemented a liquidity risk management program (the “Program”) on behalf of each of its series, including the Fund and the Portfolio, which is reasonably designed to assess and manage the Fund’s or the Portfolio’s liquidity risk. “Liquidity risk” is defined under the Liquidity Rule as the risk that the Fund or Portfolio is unable to meet redemption requests without significantly diluting remaining investors’ interests in the Fund or Portfolio. Each Trust’s Board of Trustees (each a “Board”) previously approved the designation of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”), the Fund’s investment manager and the Portfolio’s investment adviser, as the administrator of the Program, and Funds Management has established a Liquidity Risk Management Council (the “Council”) composed of personnel from multiple departments within Funds Management and its affiliates to assist Funds Management in the implementation and on-going administration of the Program.
The Program is comprised of various components designed to support the assessment and/or management of liquidity risk, including: (1) the periodic assessment (no less frequently than annually) of certain factors that influence the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s liquidity risk; (2) the periodic classification (no less frequently than monthly) of the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s investments into one of four liquidity categories that reflect an estimate of their liquidity under current market conditions; (3) a 15% limit on the acquisition of “illiquid investments” (as defined under the Liquidity Rule); (4) to the extent the Fund or the Portfolio does not invest primarily in “highly liquid investments” (as defined under the Liquidity Rule), the determination of a minimum percentage of the Fund’s or the Portfolio’s assets that generally will be invested in highly liquid investments (an “HLIM”); (5) if the Fund or the Portfolio has established an HLIM, the periodic review (no less frequently than annually) of the HLIM and the adoption of policies and procedures for responding to a shortfall of the Fund’s or the Portfolio’s “highly liquid investments” below its HLIM; and (6) periodic reporting to the Board.
At a meeting of the Board held on May 17-19, 2021, the Board received and reviewed a written report (the “Report”) from Funds Management that addressed the operation of the Program and assessed its adequacy and effectiveness for the period from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 (the “Reporting Period”). Among other things, the Report discussed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on liquidity and management of liquidity risk during the Reporting Period, including during the stressed market conditions caused by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. No significant liquidity events impacting the Fund or the Portfolio were noted in the Report. As applicable to the Fund and the Portfolio, there were no material changes to the Program during the Reporting Period.
Funds Management concluded in the Report that the Program is operating effectively to assess and manage the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s liquidity risk, and that the Program has been and continues to be adequately and effectively implemented to monitor and, as applicable, respond to the Fund’s and the Portfolio’s liquidity developments.
There can be no assurance that the Program will achieve its objectives under all circumstances in the future. Please refer to the Fund’s prospectus for more information regarding the Fund’s exposure to liquidity risk and other risks to which an investment in the Fund may be subject.

54  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
BOARD CONSIDERATION OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, ADVISORY AND SUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENTS:
Board Considerations – Current Agreements
Under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Board of Trustees (each, a “Board” and collectively, the “Boards”) of each of Wells Fargo Funds Trust (“Funds Trust”) and Wells Fargo Master Trust (“Master Trust”, and collectively, the “Trusts”) must determine annually whether to approve the continuation of the Trusts’ investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements, as applicable. In this regard, at a Board meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Meeting”), the Funds Trust Board, all the members of which have no direct or indirect interest in the investment management agreement and are not “interested persons” of the Trusts, as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), reviewed and approved for Wells Fargo Real Return Fund (the “Gateway Fund”) an investment management agreement (the “Gateway Fund Management Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”).
At the Meeting, the Master Trust Board, all the members of which have no direct or indirect interest in the investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements and are Independent Trustees, reviewed and approved: (i) an investment advisory agreement (the “Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement”) with Funds Management for Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio, a portfolio of Master Trust (the “Master Portfolio”); and (ii) an investment sub-advisory agreement (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Wells Capital Management Incorporated (the “Sub-Adviser”), an affiliate of Funds Management, for the Master Portfolio.
The Gateway Fund and the Master Portfolio are collectively referred to as the “Funds.” The Gateway Fund Management Agreement, the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement are collectively referred to as the “Advisory Agreements.”
The Gateway Fund is a gateway feeder fund that invest substantially all of its assets in the Master Portfolio. The Master Portfolio has a substantially similar investment objective and substantially similar investment strategies to the Gateway Fund. Information provided to the Boards regarding the Gateway Fund is also applicable to the Master Portfolio, as relevant.
The Boards noted that Wells Fargo & Company recently announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”), which includes Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser, to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. and/or their affiliates (the “Transaction”). The Boards further noted that the Transaction would result in a change-of-control of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser, which would be considered to be an assignment that would result in the termination of the Advisory Agreements. In light of the Transaction, each Board separately considered for approval a new investment management agreement with Funds Management and, with respect to the Master Portfolio, the Master Trust Board considered for approval a new sub-advisory agreement with the Sub-Adviser (collectively, the “New Agreements”) that would replace the Advisory Agreements upon consummation of the Transaction, subject to approval of each respective New Agreement by each Fund’s shareholders. The Boards also considered for approval interim agreements to go into effect in the event shareholders do not approve the New Agreements before the Transaction is completed. The interim agreements would allow the Manager and the Sub-Adviser, as applicable, to continue providing services to the Funds while the Funds continue to seek shareholder approval of the New Agreements. The Boards noted that the terms of the interim agreements would be identical to those of the current Advisory Agreements, except for the term and certain escrow provisions.
At the Meeting, the Boards considered the factors and reached the conclusions described below relating to the selection of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser and the approval of the Advisory Agreements. Prior to the Meeting, including at Board meetings held in April and May 2021, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with representatives of Funds Management about these matters. Also, the Boards have adopted a team-based approach, with each team consisting of a sub-set of Trustees, to assist the full Boards in the discharge of their duties in reviewing investment performance and other matters throughout the year. The Independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Advisory Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately.
In providing information to the Boards, Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser were guided by a detailed set of requests for information submitted to them by independent legal counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees at the start of the Boards’ annual contract renewal process earlier in 2021. In considering and approving the Advisory Agreements, the Trustees considered the information they believed relevant, including but not limited to the information discussed below. The Boards considered not only the specific information presented in connection with the Meeting, but also the knowledge gained over time through interaction with Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser about various topics. In this regard, the Boards reviewed reports of Funds Management at each of their quarterly meetings, which included, among other things, portfolio reviews and investment performance reports. In addition, the Boards and the teams mentioned above confer with portfolio managers at various times throughout the year. The Boards did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each individual Trustee may have attributed different weights to various factors.

Wells Fargo Real Return Fund  |  55


Board considerations (unaudited)
After its deliberations, the Funds Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Gateway Fund Management Agreement for a one-year term. Additionally, after its deliberations, the Master Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement, each for a one-year term. The Boards considered the approval of the Advisory Agreements for the Funds as part of their consideration of agreements for funds across the complex, but their approvals were made on a fund-by-fund basis. The following summarizes a number of important, but not necessarily all, factors considered by the Boards in support of their approvals.
Nature, extent and quality of services
The Boards received and considered various information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser under the Advisory Agreements. This information included a description of the investment advisory services and Fund-level administrative services, as well as, among other things, a summary of the background and experience of senior management of WFAM, of which Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser are a part, and a summary of investments made in the business of WFAM. The Boards also received a description of Funds Management’s and the Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans, including a summary of the performance of such plans and any changes thereto during the COVID-19 pandemic, and of their approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity. The Boards also received and reviewed information about Funds Management’s role as administrator of the Funds’ liquidity risk management program, Funds Management’s approach to risk management, and Funds Management’s intermediary and vendor oversight program.
The Boards also considered the qualifications, background, tenure and responsibilities of each of the portfolio managers primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the Funds. The Boards evaluated the ability of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser to attract and retain qualified investment professionals, including research, advisory and supervisory personnel.
The Boards further considered the compliance programs and compliance records of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser. In addition, the Boards took into account the full range of services provided to the Funds by Funds Management and its affiliates. The Boards also considered information about retention and back-up arrangements that have been put into place with respect to key personnel of WFAM in connection with the anticipated Transaction, noting that WFAM provided assurances that the announcement and eventual culmination of the Transaction is not expected to result in any diminution in the nature or quality of services provided to the Funds.
Fund investment performance and expenses
The Boards considered the investment performance results for each of the Funds over various time periods ended December 31, 2020. The Boards considered these results in comparison to the investment performance of funds in a universe that was determined by Broadridge Inc. (“Broadridge”) to be similar to the Gateway Fund (the “Universe”), and in comparison to the Gateway Fund’s benchmark index and to other comparative data. Broadridge is an independent provider of investment company data. The Boards received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the performance Universe. The Funds Trust Board noted that the investment performance of the Gateway Fund (Administrator Class) was higher than the average investment performance of its Universe for the five- and ten-year periods ended December 31, 2020, and was lower than the average investment performance of its Universe for the one- and three-year periods ended December 31, 2020. The Funds Trust Board also noted that the investment performance of the Gateway Fund was in range of its benchmark index, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. TIPS Index, for the five-year period ended December 31, 2020, and lower than its benchmark index for the one-, three- and ten-year periods ended December 31, 2020.
The Master Trust Board took note of the investment performance of the Master Portfolio in the context of reviewing the investment performance of the Gateway Fund.
The Funds Trust Board received information concerning, and discussed factors contributing to, the underperformance of the Gateway Fund relative to the Universe and benchmark for the periods identified above. The Funds Trust Board took note of the explanations for the relative underperformance during these periods, including with respect to investment decisions and market factors that affected the Gateway Fund’s investment performance.
The Funds Trust Board also received and considered information regarding the Gateway Fund’s net operating expense ratios, which include fees and expenses of the Master Portfolio, and their various components, including actual management fees assessed at the Gateway Fund and Master Portfolio levels, custodian and other non-management fees, and Rule 12b-1 and non-Rule 12b-1 shareholder service fees. The Funds Trust Board considered these ratios in comparison to the median ratios of funds in class-specific expense groups that were determined by Broadridge to be similar to the Gateway Fund (the “Groups”). The Funds Trust Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the expense Groups and an explanation of how funds comprising expense groups and their expense ratios may vary from year-to-year. Based on the

56  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
Broadridge reports, the Funds Trust Board noted that the net operating expense ratios of the Gateway Fund were lower than, equal to or in range of the median net operating expense ratios of its expense Groups for each share class.
With respect to the Master Portfolio, the Master Trust Board reviewed the fee rates that are payable to Funds Management for investment advisory services (as discussed below), which are the only fees charged at the Master Portfolio level, relative to a corresponding expense Group.
The Boards took into account the Funds’ investment performance and expense information provided to them among the factors considered in deciding to re-approve the Advisory Agreements.
Investment management, advisory and sub-advisory fee rates
The Funds Trust Board noted that Funds Management receives no advisory fees from the Gateway Fund as long as the Gateway Fund continues to invest all (or substantially all) of its assets in a single master portfolio. If the Gateway Fund were to change its investment structure so that it began investing in two or more master portfolios (a fund-of-funds), Funds Management would be entitled to receive an annual fee of 0.25% of the Gateway Fund’s average daily net assets for providing investment advisory services to the Gateway Fund, including allocating the Gateway Fund’s assets to the Master Portfolio.
The Funds Trust Board reviewed and considered the contractual fee rates that are payable by the Gateway Fund to Funds Management under the Gateway Fund Management Agreement for management services (other than investment advisory services), as well as the contractual fee rates payable by the Gateway Fund to Funds Management for class-level administrative services under a Class-Level Administration Agreement, which include, among other things, class-level transfer agency and sub-transfer agency costs (collectively, the “Management Rates”).
The Master Trust Board reviewed and considered the contractual investment advisory fee rate that is payable by the Master Portfolio to Funds Management for investment advisory services under the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement (the “Advisory Agreement Rate”). The Master Trust Board also reviewed and considered the contractual investment sub-advisory fee rate that is payable by Funds Management to the Sub-Adviser for investment sub-advisory services (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement Rate”).
Among other information reviewed by the Funds Trust Board was a comparison of the Gateway Fund’s Management Rate, which, for this purpose, includes the advisory fees paid at the Master Portfolio level, with the average contractual investment management fee rates of funds in the expense Groups at a common asset level as well as transfer agency costs of the funds in the expense Groups. The Funds Trust Board noted that the Management Rates of the Gateway Fund were in range of the sum of these average rates for the Gateway Fund’s expense Groups for each share class, except Class R6. The Funds Trust Board noted that the Management Rate of the Gateway Fund was higher than the sum of the average rates for the Gateway Fund’s expense Group for Class R6.
The Master Trust Board reviewed a comparison of the Advisory Agreement Rate of the Master Portfolio with those of other funds in the Master Portfolio’s expense Group at a common asset level. The Master Trust Board noted that the Advisory Agreement Rate of the Master Portfolio was equal to the median rate for the Master Portfolio’s expense Group.
The Master Trust Board also received and considered information about the portions of the total management fees that were retained by Funds Management after payment of the fees to the Sub-Adviser for sub-advisory services. In assessing the reasonableness of these amounts, the Master Trust Board received and evaluated information about the nature and extent of responsibilities retained and risks assumed by Funds Management and not delegated to or assumed by the Sub-Adviser, and about Funds Management’s on-going oversight services. Given the affiliation between Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser, the Master Trust Board ascribed limited relevance to the allocation of fees between them.
The Boards also received and considered information about the nature and extent of services offered and fee rates charged by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser to other types of clients with investment strategies similar to those of the Funds. In this regard, the Boards received information about the significantly greater scope of services, and compliance, reporting and other legal burdens and risks of managing proprietary mutual funds compared with those associated with managing assets of other types of clients, including third-party sub-advised fund clients and non-mutual fund clients such as institutional separate accounts.
Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Funds Trust Board determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the Gateway Fund Management Agreement was reasonable, and the Master Trust Board determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and to the Sub-Adviser under the Sub-Advisory Agreement was reasonable.

Wells Fargo Real Return Fund  |  57


Board considerations (unaudited)
Profitability
The Boards received and considered information concerning the profitability of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo & Co. (“Wells Fargo”) from providing services to the fund family as a whole. The Boards noted that the Sub-Adviser’s profitability information with respect to providing services to the Master Portfolio and other funds in the family was subsumed in the WFAM and Wells Fargo profitability analysis.
Funds Management reported on the methodologies and estimates used in calculating profitability, including a description of the methodology used to allocate certain expenses. Among other things, the Boards noted that the levels of profitability reported on a fund-by-fund basis varied widely, depending on factors such as the size, type and age of fund. Based on its review, the Boards did not deem the profits reported by Funds Management, WFAM or Wells Fargo from services provided to the Funds to be at a level that would prevent the Boards from approving the continuation of the Advisory Agreements.
Economies of scale
The Boards received and considered information about the potential for Funds Management to experience economies of scale in the provision of management services to the Funds, the difficulties of calculating economies of scale at an individual fund level, and the extent to which potential scale benefits are shared with shareholders of the Funds. The Boards noted the existence of breakpoints in the Master Portfolio’s advisory fee structure and the Gateway Fund’s management fee structure, which operate generally to reduce the Funds’ expense ratios as the Funds grow in size, and the size of the Master Portfolio and the Gateway Fund, respectively, in relation to such breakpoints. The Boards considered that, in addition to advisory fee and management fee breakpoints, Funds Management shares potential economies of scale from its management business in a variety of ways, including through fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangements, competitive management fee rates set at the outset without regard to breakpoints, and investments in the business intended to enhance services available to shareholders.
The Boards concluded that Funds Management’s arrangements with respect to each Fund, including contractual breakpoints, constituted a reasonable approach to sharing potential economies of scale with the Funds and their shareholders.
Other benefits to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser
The Boards received and considered information regarding potential “fall-out” or ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including the Sub-Adviser, as a result of their relationships with the Funds. Ancillary benefits could include, among others, benefits directly attributable to other relationships with the Funds and benefits potentially derived from an increase in Funds Management’s and the Sub-Adviser’s business as a result of their relationships with the Funds. The Boards noted that various affiliates of Funds Management may receive distribution-related fees, shareholder servicing payments and sub-transfer agency fees in respect of shares sold or held through them and services provided.
The Boards also reviewed information about soft dollar credits earned and utilized by the Sub-Adviser, fees earned by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser from managing a private investment vehicle for the fund family’s securities lending collateral, and commissions earned by an affiliated broker from portfolio transactions.
Based on their consideration of the factors and information they deemed relevant, including those described here, the Boards did not find that any ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including the Sub-Adviser, were unreasonable.
Conclusion
At the Meeting, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Funds Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Gateway Fund Management Agreement for a one-year term. Additionally, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Master Trust Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement, each for a one-year term.

58  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board Considerations - New Agreements
Overview of the Board evaluation process
At a meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Board Meeting”), the Board of Trustees of Wells Fargo Funds Trust (“Funds Trust”, and the series identified below, the “Funds”) approved the continuation of each Fund’s current Investment Management Agreement (the “Current Investment Management Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”) and the Board of Trustees of Wells Fargo Master Trust (“Master Trust”, and the series identified below in which each Fund invests substantially all of its assets, a “Master Portfolio”) approved the continuation of the current investment advisory agreement (the “Current Advisory Agreement”) with Funds Management, the current sub-advisory agreement with Wells Capital Management Incorporated (“Wells Capital”, and together with Funds Management, the “Advisers”), and the current sub-advisory agreements with Cooke & Bieler, L.P. (“C&B”) and Peregrine Capital Management, LLC (“Peregrine”, and together with C&B, the “Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers”)(collectively, the “Current Agreements”).
Funds Trust Master Trust
Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Fund Wells Fargo C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio
Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio
Wells Fargo Index Fund Wells Fargo Index Portfolio
Wells Fargo Real Return Fund Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio
Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Fund Wells Fargo Small Company Growth Portfolio
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Fund Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio
Each Trustee on the Funds Trust Board and the Master Trust Board of Trustees (collectively, the “Boards”) is not an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) of the Funds or the Master Portfolios (collectively, the “Independent Trustees”). The process followed by the Boards in considering and approving the continuation of each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s Current Agreements is referred to herein as the “2021 Annual Approval Process.”
As noted above, the closing of the sale of Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”) to a holding company (“NewCo”) affiliated with private funds of GTCR LLC (“GTCR”) and of Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. (“Reverence Capital”, and such transaction, the “Transaction”) will result in a change of control of Funds Management and Wells Capital, which will be considered to be an “assignment” of each Fund’s Current Agreements under the 1940 Act that will result in the automatic termination of each Fund’s Current Agreements. In light of the expected termination of each Fund’s Current Agreements upon the closing, at the Board Meeting the Boards also approved, as applicable: (i) for Funds Trust, a new investment management agreement with Funds Management (the “New Investment Management Agreement”); (ii) for the Master Trust, a new advisory agreement with Funds Management (the “New Advisory Agreement”); (iii) for Master Trust, a new sub-advisory agreement (the “New WellsCap Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Wells Capital for Emerging Growth Portfolio, Index Portfolio, Small Company Value Portfolio, Core Bond Portfolio and Real Return Portfolio; (iv) for Master Trust, a new sub-advisory agreement (the “New Peregrine Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Peregrine for Small Company Growth Portfolio; and (v) for Master Trust, a new sub-advisory agreement (the “New C&B Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with C&B for the C&B Large Cap Value Portfolio, each of which is intended to go into effect upon the closing (the “New Agreements”). The process followed by the Boards in reviewing and approving the New Agreements is referred to herein as the “New Agreement Approval Process.”
At a series of meetings held in April and May 2021 (collectively, “April and May 2021 Meetings”) and at the Board Meeting, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital about the New Agreements and related matters. The Boards reviewed and discussed information furnished by Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital that the Boards considered reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the New Agreements and the services to be provided. At these meetings, senior representatives from Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital made presentations to, and responded to questions from, the Boards.
In providing information to the Boards in connection with the 2021 annual approval process for the Current Agreements (the “2021 Annual Approval Process”) and the New Agreement Approval Process, Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital (as applicable) were guided by requests for information submitted by independent legal counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. In considering and approving the New Agreements, the Trustees considered the information they believed relevant, including but not limited to the information discussed herein. The Boards considered not only the specific information presented in connection with the April and May 2021 Meetings as well as the Board Meeting, but also the knowledge gained over time through interaction with Funds Management, as well as with Wells Capital and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers (collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”), about various topics. In this regard, the Boards review reports of Funds Management at each of their regular

Wells Fargo Real Return Fund  |  59


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board meetings, which includes, among other things, portfolio reviews and investment performance reports. In addition, the Boards confer with portfolio managers at various times throughout the year. The Boards were assisted in their evaluation of the New Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom the Independent Trustees received separate legal advice and with whom the Independent Trustees met separately. The Boards did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each individual Trustee may have attributed different weights to various factors.
Among other information considered by the Boards in connection with the Transaction was:
■  Information regarding the Transaction: information about the structure, financing sources and material terms and conditions of the Transaction, including the expected impact on the businesses conducted by the Advisers and by Wells Fargo Funds Distributor LLC, as the distributor of Fund shares.
■  Information regarding NewCo, GTCR and Reverence Capital: (i) information about NewCo, including information about its expected financial condition and access to capital, and senior leadership team; (ii) the experience of senior management at GTCR and Reverence Capital in acquiring portfolio companies; (iii) the plan to operationalize NewCo, including the transition of necessary infrastructure services through a transition services agreement with Wells Fargo under which Wells Fargo will continue to provide NewCo with certain services for a specified period of time after the closing; and (iv) information regarding regulatory matters, compliance, and risk management functions at NewCo, including resources to be dedicated thereto.
■  Impact of the Transaction on WFAM and Service Providers: (i) information regarding any changes to personnel and/or other resources of the Advisers as a result of the Transaction, including assurances regarding comparable and competitive compensation arrangements to attract and retain highly qualified personnel; and (ii) information about the organizational and operating structure with respect to NewCo, the Advisers and the Funds and Master Portfolios.
■  Impact of the Transaction on the Funds and their Shareholders and the Master Portfolios and their Interest Holders: (i) information regarding anticipated benefits to the Funds and the Master Portfolios as a result of the Transaction; (ii) a commitment that the Funds and Master Portfolios would not bear any expenses, directly or indirectly, in connection with the Transaction; (iii) confirmation that the Advisers and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers intend to continue to manage the Funds in a manner consistent with each Fund’s or Master Portfolio’s current investment objectives and principal investments strategies, as applicable; and (iv) a commitment that neither NewCo nor WFAM will take any steps that would impose any “unfair burden” (as that term is used in section 15(f)(1)(B) of the 1940 Act) on the Funds or the Master Portfolios as a result of the Transaction.
With respect to the New Agreements, the Boards considered: (i) a representation that, after the closing, all of the Funds and Master Portfolios will continue to be managed and advised by their current Advisers and Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, as applicable, and that the same portfolio managers are expected to continue to manage the Funds or Master Portfolios, as applicable, after the Transaction; (ii) information regarding the terms of the New Agreements, including changes as compared to the Current Agreements; (iii) information confirming that the fee rates payable under the New Agreements will not increase as a result of the Transaction as compared to the rates under the Current Agreements; and (iv) assurances that the Transaction is not expected to cause any diminution with respect to the nature, extent and quality of any of the services currently provided to the Funds or the Master Portfolios by the Advisers and Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers as a result of the Transaction.
In addition to considering information furnished specifically to evaluate the impact of the Transaction on the Funds and their respective shareholders and the Master Portfolios and their interest holders in connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards considered information furnished at prior meetings of the Boards and their committees, including detailed information provided in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process. In this regard, in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received information about complex-wide and individual Fund and Master Portfolio performance, fees and expenses, including: (i) a report from an independent data provider comparing the investment performance of each Fund or Master Portfolio to the investment performance of comparable funds and benchmark indices, over various time periods; (ii) a report from an independent data provider comparing each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s total expense ratio (and its components) to those of comparable funds; (iii) comparative information concerning the fees charged and services provided by the Advisers and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, to each Fund or Master Portfolio in managing other accounts (which may include other mutual funds, collective investment funds and institutional accounts), if any, that employ investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing such Fund(s) or Master Portfolio(s) as applicable; and (iv) profitability analyses of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo from providing services to the fund family as a whole.
After its deliberations, the Boards unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the respective New Agreements is reasonable, approved the respective New Agreements for a two-year term, and

60  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
voted to recommend that Fund shareholders approve the New Agreements. The Boards considered the approval of the New Agreements as part of their consideration of agreements for funds and master portfolios across the complex, but their approvals were made on a fund-by-fund basis. The following summarizes a number of important, but not necessarily all, factors considered by the Boards in support of their approvals.
Nature, extent and quality of services
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered various information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds and Master Portfolios by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the Current Agreements. This information included a description of the investment advisory services and Fund-level administrative services covered by the Current Agreements, as well as, among other things, a summary of the background and experience of senior management of WFAM, of which Funds Management and Wells Capital are a part, and a summary of investments made in the business of WFAM. The Boards also received a description of Funds Management’s and Wells Capital’s business continuity plans, including a summary of the performance of such plans and any changes thereto during the COVID-19 pandemic, and of their approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity. The Boards also received and reviewed information about Funds Management’s role as administrator of the Funds’ and Master Portfolios’ liquidity risk management program, Funds Management’s approach to risk management, and Funds Management’s intermediary and vendor oversight program.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also considered the qualifications, background, tenure and responsibilities of each of the portfolio managers primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the Funds and the Master Portfolios. The Boards evaluated the ability of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to attract and retain qualified investment professionals, including research, advisory and supervisory personnel.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards further considered the compliance programs and compliance records of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers. In addition, the Boards took into account the full range of services provided to the Funds by Funds Management and its affiliates.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards considered, among other information, the structure of the Transaction and expected impact, if any, of the Transaction on the operations, facilities, organization and personnel of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers. The Boards received assurances from Funds Management that each Fund and Master Portfolio will continue to be advised by its current Sub-Advisers after the closing, and that the same individual portfolio managers are expected to continue to manage the Funds and Master Portfolios, respectively, after the closing. With respect to the recruitment and retention of key personnel, the Boards noted information from GTCR, Reverence Capital and the Advisers regarding the potential benefits for employees of joining NewCo. The Boards recognized that the personnel of the Advisers who had been extended offers may not accept such offers, and personnel changes at the Advisers or the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers may occur in the future in the ordinary course.
In addition, the Boards considered information regarding the infrastructure, operational capabilities and support staff in place to assist in the portfolio management and operations of the Funds and Master Portfolios, as applicable, including the provision of administrative services, and the anticipated impact of the Transaction on such matters. The Boards also considered the business-related and other risks to which the Advisers and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers may be subject in managing the Funds and Master Portfolios, as applicable, and in connection with the Transaction. The Boards also considered the transition and integration plans as a result of the change in ownership of the Advisers from Wells Fargo to NewCo. The Boards considered the resources and infrastructure that NewCo intends to devote to its compliance program to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations, as well as its risk management program and cybersecurity program. The Boards also took into account assurances received from the Advisers, GTCR and Reverence Capital that the Transaction is not expected to cause any diminution in the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Advisers or the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers to the Funds and their shareholders or to the Master Portfolios and their interest holders, as applicable.
Fund investment performance and expenses
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards considered the investment performance results for each Fund over various time periods ended December 31, 2020. The Boards considered these results in comparison to the investment performance of funds in a universe that was determined by Broadridge Inc. (“Broadridge”) to be similar to each Fund (the “Universe”), and in comparison to each Fund’s benchmark index and to other comparative data. Broadridge is an independent provider of investment company data. The Boards received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the performance Universe. Where applicable, the Boards received information concerning, and discussed factors contributing to, underperformance of Funds relative to the Universe and benchmark for any underperformance periods.
The Master Trust Board of Trustees took note of the investment performance of the Master Portfolios in the context of reviewing the investment performance of the Funds.

Wells Fargo Real Return Fund  |  61


Board considerations (unaudited)
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also received and considered information regarding each Fund’s and Portfolio’s net operating expense ratios and their various components, including actual management fees, custodian and other non-management fees, and Rule 12b-1 and non-Rule 12b-1 shareholder service fees. The Boards considered these ratios in comparison to the median ratios of funds in class-specific expense groups that were determined by Broadridge to be similar to each Fund (the “Groups”). The Boards received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the expense Groups and an explanation of how funds comprising expense groups and their expense ratios may vary from year-to-year.
With respect to the Master Portfolios, the Master Trust Board of Trustees reviewed the fee rates that are payable to Funds Management for investment advisory services, which are the only fees charged at the Master Portfolio level, relative to a corresponding expense Group.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards received a commitment that WFAM will maintain fee and expense commitments for at least two years after the closing. The Boards took into account each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s investment performance and expense information among the factors considered in deciding to approve the New Agreements.
Investment management, advisory and sub-advisory fee rates
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board of Trustees of the Trust noted that Funds Management receives no advisory fees from a Fund as long as the Fund continues to invest all (or substantially all) of its assets in a single master portfolio. If a Fund were to change its investment structure so that it began investing in two or more master portfolios (a fund-of-funds), Funds Management would be entitled to receive an annual fee of 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets for providing investment advisory services to the Fund, including allocating the Fund’s assets among the Master Portfolios.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board of Trustees of the Trust reviewed and considered the contractual fee rates that are payable by each Fund to Funds Management under the Fund’s Management Agreement for management services (other than investment advisory services), as well as the contractual fee rates payable by the Fund to Funds Management for class-level administrative services under a Class-Level Administration Agreement, which include, among other things, class-level transfer agency and subtransfer agency costs (collectively, the “Management Rates”). The Master Trust Board of Trustees reviewed and considered the contractual investment advisory fee rate that is payable by each Master Portfolio to Funds Management for investment advisory services under the Master Portfolio Advisory Agreement (the “Advisory Agreement Rate”). The Master Trust Board of Trustees also reviewed and considered the contractual investment sub-advisory fee rates that are payable by Funds Management to the Sub-Advisers for investment sub-advisory services (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement Rates”).
Among other information reviewed by the Boards in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, was a comparison of each Fund’s Management Rates which, for this purpose, includes the advisory fees paid at the Master Portfolio level, with the average contractual investment management fee rates of funds in the expense Groups at a common asset level as well as transfer agency costs of the funds in the expense Groups.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also received and considered information about the nature and extent of services offered and fee rates charged by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to other types of clients, if any, with investment strategies similar to those of each Fund. In this regard, the Boards received information about the significantly greater scope of services, and compliance, reporting and other legal burdens and risks of managing proprietary mutual funds compared with those associated with managing assets of other types of clients, including third-party sub-advised fund clients and non-mutual fund clients such as institutional separate accounts.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards noted the assurances received by it that there would be no increases to any of the Management Rates, the Advisory Agreement Rates or the Sub-Advisory Agreement Rates as a result of the Transaction. The Boards also considered that the New Agreements do not change the computation method for calculating such fees, and there is no present intention to reduce expense waiver and reimbursement arrangements that are currently in effect. Based on their consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Boards determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the New Management Agreement and the New Advisory Agreement and payable to the Sub-Advisers under the New Sub-Advisory Agreements was reasonable.
Profitability
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered information concerning the profitability of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo from providing services to the fund family as a whole. The Boards noted that Wells Capital’s profitability information with respect to providing services to each Fund

62  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
and other funds in the family was subsumed in the WFAM and Wells Fargo profitability analysis. The Boards did not consider profitability with respect to the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, as the sub-advisory fees paid to the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers had been negotiated by Funds Management on an arm’s-length basis.
Funds Management reported on the methodologies and estimates used in calculating profitability in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, including a description of the methodology used to allocate certain expenses. Among other things, the Boards noted that the levels of profitability reported on a fund-by-fund basis varied widely, depending on factors such as the size, type and age of fund.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards received certain information about NewCo’s projected financial condition, and reviewed with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital the underlying assumptions on which such information was based. The Boards considered that NewCo is a newly formed entity, with no historical operations, revenues or expenses, and that it is difficult to predict with any degree of certainty the future profitability of NewCo and the Advisers from advisory activities under the New Agreements. The Boards considered that the fee rates payable under the New Agreements will not increase as a result of the Transaction as compared to the rates under the Current Agreements, and that the current contractual expense limitations applicable to each Fund will not increase. The Boards noted that if the New Agreements are approved by shareholders and the Transaction closes, the Boards will have the opportunity in the future to review the profitability of NewCo and the Advisers from advisory activities under the New Agreements with the Advisers.
Economies of scale
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered information about the potential for Funds Management to experience economies of scale in the provision of management services to the Funds and the Master Portfolios, the difficulties of calculating economies of scale at an individual fund level, and the extent to which potential scale benefits are shared with Fund shareholders. The Boards noted the existence of breakpoints in each Fund’s management fee structure and each Master Portfolio’s advisory fee structure, which operate generally to reduce each Fund’s and Master Portfolio’s and expense ratios as they grows in size, and the size of each Fund and Master Portfolio and in relation to such breakpoints. The Boards considered that, in addition to advisory fee and management fee and advisory fee breakpoints, Funds Management shares potential economies of scale from its management business in a variety of ways, including through fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangements, competitive management fee rates set at the outset without regard to breakpoints, and investments in the business intended to enhance services available to shareholders.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards noted that NewCo and the Advisers may benefit from possible growth of the Funds and Master Portfolios resulting from enhanced distribution capabilities. However, the Boards noted that other factors could also affect the potential for economies of scale, and that it was not possible to quantify any potential future economies of scale. Based upon the information furnished to the Boards in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process and the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards concluded that Funds Management’s arrangements with respect to each Fund and Master Portfolio, including contractual breakpoints and expense limitation arrangements, constitute a reasonable approach to sharing potential economies of scale with the Fund and its shareholders and the Master Portfolio and its interest holders.
“Fall-out” benefits to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards received and considered information regarding potential “fall-out” or ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including Wells Capital, and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers as a result of their relationships with the Funds and the Master Portfolios, as applicable. Ancillary benefits could include, among others, benefits directly attributable to other relationships with the Funds and Master Portfolios and benefits potentially derived from an increase in Funds Management’s and the Wells Capital’s business as a result of their relationships with the Funds and the Master Portfolios. The Boards noted that various current affiliates of Funds Management may receive distribution-related fees, shareholder servicing payments and sub-transfer agency fees in respect of shares sold or held through them and services provided.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Boards also reviewed information about any soft dollar credits earned and utilized by the Sub-Advisers, fees earned by Funds Management and Wells Capital from managing a private investment vehicle for the fund family’s securities lending collateral, and commissions earned by an affiliated broker of Wells Fargo from portfolio transactions.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Boards received information to the effect that the Transaction is not expected to have a material impact on the fall-out benefits currently realized by Funds Management and its affiliates, including Wells Capital, and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers. The information reviewed by the Boards also noted that several of the ancillary benefits identified for WFAM would be potential ancillary benefits for NewCo, including that the scale and reputation of

Wells Fargo Real Return Fund  |  63


Board considerations (unaudited)
the Funds and Master Portfolios might benefit NewCo’s broader reputation, product initiatives, technology investment and talent acquisition. Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Boards did not find that any ancillary benefits expected to be received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including NewCo and Wells Capital and the Unaffiliated Sub-Advisers, under the New Agreements were unreasonable.
Conclusion
At the Board Meeting, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Boards unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the New Agreements is reasonable, approved the New Agreements for a two-year term, and voted to recommend that Fund shareholders approve the New Agreements.

64  |  Wells Fargo Real Return Fund


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board Considerations - Interim Agreements
At a meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Board Meeting”), the Boards of Trustees (each, a “Board”, and collectively, the “Boards”) of Wells Fargo Funds Trust, Wells Fargo Master Trust, Wells Fargo Variable Trust, Wells Fargo Global Dividend Opportunity Fund, Wells Fargo Income Opportunities Fund, Wells Fargo Multi-Sector Income Fund and Wells Fargo Utilities and High Income Fund (each a “Trust”, and the series thereof, a “Fund”) reviewed and approved for the Trusts and Funds, as applicable: (i) interim investment management agreements (the “Interim Management Agreements”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”); (ii) interim investment advisory agreements (the “Interim Advisory Agreements”) with Funds Management; and (iii) interim sub-advisory agreements (the “Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements”) with each of Cooke & Bieler, L.P., Galliard Capital Management LLC (“Galliard”), Peregrine Capital Management Inc., Wells Capital Management LLC (“WellsCap”), and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited (“WFAMI”, and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”). Each Trustee on the Board is not an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) of the Funds (collectively, the “Independent Trustees”). The Interim Management Agreements, Interim Advisory Agreements, and Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements are collectively referred to as the “Interim Advisory Agreements.”
At the Board Meeting, the Boards reviewed and approved the continuation of existing investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements (the “Current Advisory Agreements”) for each Trust and Fund, as applicable. The factors considered and conclusions reached by the Boards in approving the Current Advisory Agreements are summarized in the section entitled “Board Considerations – Current Agreements” of this shareholder report. The Boards noted that Wells Fargo & Company has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”), which includes Funds Management, Galliard, WellsCap and WFAMI (the “Affiliated Sub-Advisers”), to a holding company affiliated with private funds of GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. (the “Transaction”). The Boards further noted that the Transaction would result in a change-of-control of Funds Management and the Affiliated Sub-Advisers, which would be considered to be an “assignment” under the 1940 Act that would terminate the Current Advisory Agreements. At the Board Meeting, the Boards also reviewed and approved new investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements (the “New Advisory Agreements”) for each Trust and Fund, as applicable, that would replace the Current Advisory Agreements upon consummation of the Transaction, subject to approval of the New Advisory Agreements by the applicable Trust’s or Fund’s shareholders. The factors considered and conclusions reached by the Boards in approving the New Advisory Agreements are summarized in the section entitled “Board Considerations – New Agreements” of this shareholder report.
At the Board Meeting, the Boards also approved the Interim Advisory Agreements, which will go into effect for a Trust or Fund only in the event that shareholders of such Trust or Fund do not approve the New Advisory Agreement(s) for the Trust or Fund by the closing date of the Transaction, when the Current Advisory Agreements will terminate. The Board noted that, in such a circumstance, the Interim Advisory Agreements will permit continuity of management by allowing Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to continue providing services to the Trust or Fund pursuant to the Interim Advisory Agreements while the Trust or Fund continues to solicit shareholder approval of such New Advisory Agreement(s). The Boards noted that the terms of the Interim Advisory Agreements are identical to those of the Current Advisory Agreements, except for the term and the addition of escrow provisions with respect to the advisory fees. The Boards also noted that the entities that would service the Funds and Trusts under the Interim Advisory Agreements are identical to those that provide services under the Current Advisory Agreements and those that will provide services under the New Advisory Agreements.
In approving the Interim Advisory Agreements, the Boards considered the same factors and reached the same conclusions as they considered and reached with respect to the Boards’ approvals of the Current Advisory Agreements and New Advisory Agreements, as applicable, which are described in separate Board Consideration sections within this shareholder report. Prior to the Board Meeting, including at a series of meetings held in April and May 2021, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. about the Interim Advisory Agreements and related matters. The Independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Interim Advisory Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately.
At the Board Meeting, after considering the factors and reaching the conclusions described in the separate Board Consideration sections within this shareholder report, the Boards unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and to each Sub-Adviser under each of the Interim Advisory Agreements was reasonable, and approved the Interim Advisory Agreements.

Wells Fargo Real Return Fund  |  65


For more information
More information about Wells Fargo Funds is available free upon request. To obtain literature, please write, visit the Fund's website, or call:
Wells Fargo Funds
P.O. Box 219967
Kansas City, MO 64121-9967
Website: wfam.com
Individual investors: 1-800-222-8222
Retail investment professionals: 1-888-877-9275
Institutional investment professionals: 1-866-765-0778
This report and the financial statements contained herein are submitted for the general information of the shareholders of the Fund. If this report is used for promotional purposes, distribution of the report must be accompanied or preceded by a current prospectus. Before investing, please consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of the investment. For a current prospectus and, if available, a summary prospectus, containing this information, call 1-800-222-8222 or visit the Fund's website at wfam.com. Read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) is the trade name for certain investment advisory/management firms owned by Wells Fargo & Company. These firms include but are not limited to Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC. Certain products managed by WFAM entities are distributed by Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC (a broker-dealer and Member FINRA).
This material is for general informational and educational purposes only and is NOT intended to provide investment advice or a recommendation of any kind - including a recommendation for any specific investment, strategy, or plan.
 INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED  ■  NO BANK GUARANTEE  ■  MAY LOSE VALUE 
© 2021 Wells Fargo & Company. All rights reserved.
PAR-0621-00770 07-21
A288/AR288 05-21


Annual Report
May 31, 2021
Multi-Asset Funds
Wells Fargo Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund (formerly, Wells Fargo WealthBuilder Equity Fund)
Wells Fargo Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund (formerly, Wells Fargo WealthBuilder Moderate Balanced Fund)
Wells Fargo Spectrum Growth Fund (formerly, Wells Fargo WealthBuilder Growth Allocation Fund)
Wells Fargo Spectrum Income Allocation Fund (formerly, Wells Fargo WealthBuilder Conservative Allocation Fund)
Wells Fargo Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund (formerly, Wells Fargo WealthBuilder Growth Balanced Fund)




Contents
 
Reduce clutter.
Save trees.
Sign up for electronic delivery of prospectuses and shareholder reports at wellsfargo.com/ advantagedelivery
The views expressed and any forward-looking statements are as of May 31, 2021, unless otherwise noted, and are those of the Fund's portfolio managers and/or Wells Fargo Asset Management. Discussions of individual securities or the markets generally are not intended as individual recommendations. Future events or results may vary significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. The views expressed are subject to change at any time in response to changing circumstances in the market. Wells Fargo Asset Management and the Fund disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any views expressed or forward-looking statements.
 INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED  ■  NO BANK GUARANTEE  ■  MAY LOSE VALUE 

Multi-Asset Funds  |  1


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
Andrew Owen
President
Wells Fargo Funds
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to offer you this annual report for the Wells Fargo Spectrum Funds for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021. Effective October 30, 2020, the Wells Fargo WealthBuilder Funds changed its name to the Wells Fargo Spectrum Funds and each Fund was renamed accordingly. Despite the initial challenges presented by the spread of COVID-19 cases and the business restrictions implemented throughout much of the world, global stocks showed robust returns, supported by global stimulus programs, a rapid vaccination rollout, and recovering consumer and corporate sentiment. Bond markets mostly produced positive returns, as investors searched for yield and diversification during difficult market stretches.
For the 12-month period, equities had robust returns, as policymakers continued to fight the effects of COVID-19. Emerging market stocks led both non-U.S. developed market equities and U.S. stocks. Gains by fixed-income securities were varied, though mostly positive. For the period, U.S. stocks, based on the S&P 500 Index,1 gained 40.32%. International stocks, as measured by the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net),2 returned 42.78%, while the MSCI EM Index (Net),3 had stronger performance, with a 51.00% gain. Among bond indexes, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index,4 returned -0.40%, the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (unhedged),5 gained 7.84%, the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index,6 returned 4.74%, and the ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index,7 returned 15.18%.
The COVID-19 lockdown began over a year ago.
By June, economies started to reopen and global central banks committed to do all they could to provide economic support through liquidity and low borrowing costs. U.S. economic activity was aided by one-time $1,200 stimulus checks and $600 weekly bonus unemployment benefits that lasted through July. However, unemployment remained historically high and COVID-19 cases began to increase by late June. China’s economic recovery began to pick up momentum.
July was broadly positive for equities and fixed income. However, economic data and a resurgence of COVID-19 cases underscored the urgent need to regain control of the pandemic. Second-quarter gross domestic product (GDP) shrank from the previous quarter by 9.5% and 12.1% in the U.S. and the eurozone, respectively. In contrast, China’s second-quarter GDP grew 3.2% year over year. The U.S. economy added 1.8 million jobs in July, but a double-digit jobless rate persisted.

1 The S&P 500 Index consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. It is a market-value-weighted index with each stock's weight in the index proportionate to its market value. You cannot invest directly in an index.
2 The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) All Country World Index (ACWI) ex USA Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed and emerging markets, excluding the United States. Source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI. You cannot invest directly in an index.

3 The MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure equity market performance of emerging markets. You cannot invest directly in an index.

4 The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based benchmark that measures the investment-grade, U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage pass-throughs), asset-backed securities, and commercial mortgage-backed securities. You cannot invest directly in an index.

5 The Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (unhedged) is an unmanaged index that provides a broad-based measure of the global investment-grade fixed-income markets excluding the U.S. dollar-denominated debt market. You cannot invest directly in an index.

6 The Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index composed of long-term tax-exempt bonds with a minimum credit rating of Baa. You cannot invest directly in an index.

7 The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index of domestic and Yankee high-yield bonds. The index tracks the performance of high-yield securities traded in the U.S. bond market. You cannot invest directly in an index. Copyright 2021. ICE Data Indices, LLC. All rights reserved.

2  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
The stock market continued to rally in August despite concerns over rising numbers of U.S. and European COVID-19 cases as well as the July expiration of the $600 weekly bonus unemployment benefit. Relatively strong second-quarter earnings boosted investor sentiment along with the U.S. Federal Reserve Board’s (Fed’s) announcement of a monetary policy shift expected to support longer-term low interest rates. U.S. manufacturing and services activity indexes beat expectations while the U.S. housing market maintained strength. In Europe, retail sales expanded and consumer confidence was steady. China’s economy continued to expand.
Stocks grew more volatile in September on mixed economic data. U.S. economic activity continued to grow. However, U.S. unemployment remained elevated at 7.9% in September. With the U.S. Congress delaying further fiscal relief and uncertainties surrounding a possible vaccine, doubts crept back into the financial markets. In the U.K., a lack of progress in Brexit talks weighed on markets. China’s economy picked up steam, fueled by increased global demand.
In October, capital markets stepped back from their six-month rally. Market volatility rose in advance of the U.S. election and amid a global increase in COVID-19 infections. Europe introduced tighter restrictions affecting economic activity. U.S. markets looked favorably at the prospect of Democratic control of the federal purse strings, which could lead to additional fiscal stimulus and a boost to economic activity. Meanwhile, China reported 4.9% third-quarter GDP growth.
Global stocks rallied in November, propelled by optimism over three promising COVID-19 vaccines. Reversing recent trends, value stocks outperformed growth stocks and cyclical stocks outpaced information technology (IT) stocks. However, U.S. unemployment remained elevated, with a net job loss of 10 million since February. The eurozone services Purchasing Managers' Index, a monthly survey of purchasing managers, contracted sharply while the region’s manufacturing activity grew. The U.S. election results added to the upbeat mood as investors anticipated more consistent policies in the new administration.
Financial markets ended the year with strength on high expectations for a rapid rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines, the successful passage of a $900 billion stimulus package, and rising expectations of additional economic support from a Democratic-led Congress. U.S. economic data were mixed with still-elevated unemployment and weak retail sales but growth in manufacturing output. In contrast, China’s economic expansion continued in both manufacturing and nonmanufacturing. U.S. COVID-19 infection rates continued to rise even as new state and local lockdown measures were implemented.
The calendar year 2021 began with emerging market stocks leading all major asset classes in January, driven by China’s strong economic growth and a broad recovery in corporate earnings, which propelled China’s stock market higher. In the U.S., positive news on vaccine trials and January expansion in both the manufacturing and services sectors was offset by a weak December monthly jobs report. This was compounded by technical factors as some hedge funds were forced to sell stocks to protect themselves against a well-publicized short squeeze coordinated by a group of retail investors. Eurozone sentiment and economic growth were particularly weak, reflecting the impact of a new lockdown with stricter social distancing along with a slow vaccine rollout.
February saw major domestic equity indexes driven higher on the hope of a new stimulus bill, improving COVID-19 vaccination numbers, and the gradual reopening of the economy. Most S&P 500 companies reported better-than-expected earnings, with positive surprises coming from the financials, IT, health care, and materials sectors. Japan saw its economy strengthen as a result of strong export numbers. Meanwhile, crude oil prices continued their climb, rising more than 25% for the year. Domestic government bonds experienced a sharp sell-off in late February as markets priced in a more robust economic recovery and higher future growth and inflation expectations.
Global stocks rallied in November, propelled by optimism over three promising COVID-19 vaccines.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  3


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
The passage of the massive domestic stimulus bill highlighted March activity, leading to increased forecasts for U.S. growth in 2021.
The passage of the massive domestic stimulus bill highlighted March activity, leading to increased forecasts for U.S. growth in 2021. Domestic employment surged as COVID-19 vaccinations and an increasingly open economy spurred hiring. A majority of U.S. small companies reported they were operating at pre-pandemic capacity or higher. Value stocks continued its outperformance of growth stocks in the month, continuing the trend that started in late 2020. Meanwhile, most major developed global equity indexes were up month to date on the back of rising optimism regarding the outlook for global growth. While the U.S. and U.K. have been the most successful in terms of the vaccine rollout, even in markets where the vaccine has lagged, such as in the eurozone and Japan, equity indexes in many of those countries have also been in positive territory this year.
Equity markets produced another strong showing in April. Domestically, the continued reopening of the economy had a strong impact on positive equity performance, as people started leaving their households and jobless claims continued to fall. Domestic corporate bonds performed well and the U.S. dollar weakened. Meanwhile, the U.S. government continued to seek to invest in the recovery, this time by outlining a package of over $2 billion to improve infrastructure. The primary headwind in April was inflation, as investors tried to determine the breadth and longevity of recent price increases. Developed Europe has been supported by a meaningful increase in the pace of vaccinations. Unfortunately many emerging market countries have not been as successful. India in particular has seen COVID-19 cases surge, serving as an example of the need to get vaccinations rolled out to less developed nations.
Vaccine rollouts continued in May, leading to loosened restrictions globally. As a result, equity markets in general saw a minor increase in returns. Concerns that the continued economic rebound could result in inflation increases becoming more than transitory were supported by the higher input costs businesses are experiencing. Meanwhile, those inflation concerns were tempered by the Fed, which stayed steady on its view of the economy and eased fears of a sudden and substantial policy change. Positive performance in the emerging market equity space was supported this month by steady consumer demand and strong commodity prices. Fixed-income markets were also slightly positive for the month, driven by inflation uncertainty and a softer U.S. dollar.
Don’t let short-term uncertainty derail long-term investment goals.
Periods of investment uncertainty can present challenges, but experience has taught us that maintaining long-term investment goals can be an effective way to plan for the future. Although diversification cannot guarantee an investment profit or prevent losses, we believe it can be an effective way to manage investment risk and potentially smooth out overall portfolio performance. We encourage investors to know their investments and to understand that appropriate levels of risk-taking may unlock opportunities.
Thank you for choosing to invest with Wells Fargo Funds. We appreciate your confidence in us and remain committed to helping you meet your financial needs.
Sincerely,
Andrew Owen
President
Wells Fargo Funds

For further information about your Fund, contact your investment professional, visit our website at wfam.com, or call us directly at 1-800-222-8222.

4  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Letter to shareholders (unaudited)
Preparing for LIBOR Transition
The global financial industry is preparing to transition away from the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), a key benchmark interest rate, to new alternative rates. LIBOR underpins more than $350 trillion of financial contracts. It is the benchmark rate for a wide spectrum of products ranging from residential mortgages to corporate bonds to derivatives. Regulators have called for a market-wide transition away from LIBOR to successor reference rates by the end of 2021 (extended through June 30, 2023 for most tenors of the U.S. dollar LIBOR), which requires proactive steps be taken by issuers, counterparties, and asset managers to identify impacted products and adopt new reference rates.
Each Fund (except Wells Fargo Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund) invests in at least one underlying fund that holds at one or more securities that use LIBOR as a floating reference rate and has a maturity date after December 31, 2021.
Although the transition process away from LIBOR has become increasingly well-defined in advance of the anticipated discontinuation date, there remains uncertainty regarding the nature of successor reference rates, and any potential effects of the transition away from LIBOR on investment instruments that use it as a benchmark rate. The transition process may result in, among other things, increased volatility or illiquidity in markets for instruments that currently rely on LIBOR and could negatively impact the value of certain instruments held by each Fund.
Wells Fargo Asset Management is monitoring LIBOR exposure closely and has put resources and controls in place to manage this transition effectively. Each Fund’s portfolio management team is evaluating LIBOR holdings to understand what happens to those securities when LIBOR ceases to exist, including examining security documentation to identify the presence or absence of fallback language identifying a replacement rate to LIBOR.
While the pace of transition away from LIBOR will differ by asset class and investment strategy, the portfolio management team will monitor market conditions for those holdings to identify and mitigate deterioration or volatility in pricing and liquidity and ensure appropriate actions are taken in a timely manner.
Further information regarding the potential risks associated with the discontinuation of LIBOR can be found in the Funds' Statement of Additional Information.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  5


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Wells Fargo Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund

Investment objective The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation with no emphasis on income.
Manager Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC
Subadviser Wells Capital Management Incorporated
Portfolio managers Kandarp R. Acharya, CFA®, FRM, Christian L. Chan, CFA®, Travis L. Keshemberg, CFA®, CIPM, FRM
    
Average annual total returns (%) as of May 31, 2021
    Including sales charge   Excluding sales charge   Expense ratios1 (%)
  Inception date 1 year 5 year 10 year   1 year 5 year 10 year   Gross Net 2
Class A (WEAFX)3 2-10-2017 30.56 13.92 9.71   38.53 15.28 10.36   1.05 1.03
Class C (WEACX)4 10-1-1997 36.57 14.54 10.00   37.57 14.54 10.00   1.80 1.78
Institutional Class (WEAYX)5 7-31-2018   38.96 15.49 10.46   0.72 0.70
Spectrum Aggressive Growth Blended Index6   43.62 15.44 11.55  
MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net)7   42.78 10.88 5.36  
Russell 3000® Index8   43.91 17.36 14.21  
Figures quoted represent past performance, which is no guarantee of future results, and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder may pay on an investment in a fund. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance shown without sales charges would be lower if sales charges were reflected. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted, which assumes the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. Current month-end performance is available on the Fund’s website, wfam.com.
Please keep in mind that high double-digit returns were primarily achieved during favorable market conditions. You should not expect that such favorable returns can be consistently achieved. A fund’s performance, especially for short time periods, should not be the sole factor in making your investment decision.
Index returns do not include transaction costs associated with buying and selling securities, any mutual fund fees or expenses, or any taxes. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
For Class A shares, the maximum front-end sales charge is 5.75%. For Class C shares, the maximum contingent deferred sales charge is 1.00%. Performance including a contingent deferred sales charge assumes the sales charge for the corresponding time period. Institutional Class shares are sold without a front-end sales charge or contingent deferred sales charge.
1 Reflects the expense ratios as stated in the most recent prospectuses, which include the impact of 0.28% in acquired fund fees and expenses. Net expenses from affiliated master portfolios are included in the acquired fund fees and expense amount. The expense ratios shown are subject to change and may differ from the annualized expense ratios shown in the financial highlights of this report, which do not include acquired fund fees and expenses.
2 The manager has contractually committed through September 30, 2022, to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers at 0.75% for Class A, 1.50% for Class C, and 0.42% for Institutional Class. Brokerage commissions, stamp duty fees, interest, taxes, acquired fund fees and expenses (if any), net expenses from affiliated master portfolios, and extraordinary expenses are excluded from the expense caps. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. Without these caps, the Fund’s returns would have been lower. The expense ratio paid by an investor is the net expense ratio (the total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers) as stated in the prospectuses.
3 Historical performance for the Class A shares prior to their inception reflects the performance of the Class C shares and includes the higher expenses applicable to the Class C shares. If these expenses had not been included, returns for the Class A shares would be higher.
4 Prior to February 13, 2017, historical performance shown for the Class C shares reflects the performance of the Fund’s predecessor WealthBuilder Portfolio share class and does not reflect the front-end sales load previously attributable to the predecessor class. The expenses for the Class C shares and the predecessor share class are similar.
5 Historical performance shown for the Institutional Class shares prior to their inception reflects the performance of the Class A shares adjusted to reflect that the Institutional Class shares do not have a sales load but not adjusted to reflect the Institutional Class expenses. If these expenses had been included, returns for the Institutional Class shares would be higher.
6 Source: Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC. The Spectrum Aggressive Growth Blended Index is composed 70% of the Russell 3000® Index and 30% of the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net). Effective November 2, 2020, the WealthBuilder Equity Blended Index was renamed the Spectrum Aggressive Growth Blended Index. You cannot invest directly in an index.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.

6  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Wells Fargo Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund (continued)

Growth of $10,000 investment as of May 31, 20211
1 The chart compares the performance of Class A shares for the most recent ten years with the Spectrum Aggressive Growth Blended Index, MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net) and Russell 3000® Index. The chart assumes a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in Class A shares and reflects all operating expenses and assumes the maximum initial sales charge of 5.75%.
Footnotes continued from previous page
7 The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) All Country World Index (ACWI) ex USA Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed and emerging markets, excluding the United States. Source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indexes or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI. You cannot invest directly in an index.
8 The Russell 3000® Index measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization, which represents approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market. You cannot invest directly in an index.
Stock values fluctuate in response to the activities of individual companies and general market and economic conditions. The Fund will indirectly be exposed to all of the risks of an investment in the underlying funds and will indirectly bear expenses of the underlying funds. The use of derivatives may reduce returns and/or increase volatility. Certain investment strategies tend to increase the total risk of an investment (relative to the broader market). This Fund is exposed to alternative investment risk, foreign investment risk and smaller-company investment risk. Consult the Fund’s prospectus for additional information on these and other risks.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  7


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Wells Fargo Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund (continued)

MANAGER'S DISCUSSION
Fund highlights
The Fund underperformed the Spectrum Aggressive Growth Blended Index for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021.
The Dynamic Risk Hedging (DRH) overlay was the largest detractor from relative performance over the period.
Strong relative performance from the actively managed small-cap managers was the largest contributor to performance.
Stock markets posted remarkable gains as the world recuperated from the pandemic.
The 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021, saw strong results from the large-cap U.S. equity markets, as illustrated by the Russell 1000® Index’s* return of 42.66%. Within the U.S. equity markets, small-capitalization stocks outperformed the large-capitalization market. The small-cap Russell 2000® Index** returned 64.56%. The broad foreign markets also did well, as reflected by the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net)'s return of 42.78%. Aided by unprecedented levels of monetary and fiscal stimulus, the economy staged an impressive recovery from the pandemic contraction and risky assets performed very well.
Ten largest holdings (%) as of May 31, 20211
Wells Fargo Disciplined Large Cap Portfolio 27.45
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio 19.82
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF 11.77
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Equity Portfolio 10.81
Wells Fargo Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 3.85
Wells Fargo Endeavor Select Fund Class R6 3.84
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio 3.27
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6 3.11
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF 2.61
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF 2.47
1 Figures represent the percentage of the Fund's net assets. Holdings are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
Portfolio management modernized the asset allocation approach employed in the fund.
On November 1, 2020, we employed an updated asset allocation approach. Historically, the Fund allocated a fixed percentage to domestic and international stocks. The allocation is now viewed through a lens that manages risk by balancing exposures to growth, rates, and inflation factors. To help facilitate these changes, we increased our underlying exposure to factor- and passive-based investments within the Fund over the period.
The various equity sleeves used within the portfolio produced mixed results over the period. Our actively managed U.S. small-cap managers performed well. The U.S. small-cap growth portfolio returned 53.75% and the U.S. small-cap value portfolio returned 78.63%. Early in the period, our factor-enhanced equity investments tended to underperform on a relative basis, and this was the largest detraction from performance among the managers.
The DRH activity employed within the Fund detracted around 207 basis points (bps; 100 bps equal 1.00%) from performance. DRH has two components, Put Replication Overlay (PRO), which tends to focus on tail-risk management, and Volatility Management Overlay (VMO), which manages overall volatility within the portfolio. The Chicago Board Options Exchange Market Volatility Index (VIX)*** (a proxy for market volatility) started the period at 27 but ended near 17 as markets regained their footing (higher number values represent higher volatility). While volatility declined over the period, there were some short-lived swings. With respect to PRO, on average, -0.02% of the equity portfolio was hedged over the year; the max hedge of -1.0% was reached on June 15. Outside of the first few weeks of the period, PRO tended to be dormant for the bulk of the year. Over the entire period, PRO detracted 6 bps from performance. With respect to VMO, the short-lived spikes in
 

* The Russell 1000® Index measures the performance of the 1,000 largest companies in the Russell 3000® Index, which represents approximately 92% of the total market capitalization of the Russell 3000® Index. You cannot invest directly in an index.
** The Russell 2000® Index measures the performance of the 2,000 smallest companies in the Russell 3000® Index, which represents approximately 8% of the total market capitalization of the Russell 3000® Index. You cannot invest directly in an index.

* The Russell 1000® Index measures the performance of the 1,000 largest companies in the Russell 3000® Index, which represents approximately 92% of the total market capitalization of the Russell 3000® Index. You cannot invest directly in an index.
*** The Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) Market Volatility Index (VIX) is a popular measure of the implied volatility of S&P 500 Index options. It represents one measure of the market's expectation of stock market volatility over the next 30-day period. You cannot invest directly in an index.

8  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Wells Fargo Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund (continued)

volatility caused the VMO overlay to go short numerous times this year. As the markets enjoyed incredibly strong performance, this hedging activity detracted from performance. Over the entire period, VMO detracted 201 bps from performance.
Allocation (%) as of May 31, 2021
  Neutral
allocation
Effective
allocation1
U.S. Large Cap Equity Funds 60 60
U.S. Small Cap Equity Funds 10 10
International Equity Funds 30 30
1 Effective allocation includes the effect of any tactical futures overlay that may be in place. Effective cash, if any, represents the net offset to such future positions. These amounts are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
Looking ahead, we are guardedly optimistic.
The massive amount of uncertainty we faced last year at this time has faded. While the daunting impacts of the virus, U.S. civil unrest, domestic politics, and geopolitical tensions are still very fresh in our mind’s eye, we increasingly see these issues in the rear-view mirror. The rollout of the vaccine, the reduction of political rhetoric, and a very accommodative
Federal Reserve Board (Fed) have all helped calm fears. While COVID-19 cases are declining and America is returning to work, we are focused on understanding the economic impacts of the recent, unprecedented monetary and fiscal policy effects on the portfolio. While we expect equity markets will continue to advance over the next 12 months, it may be at a much slower pace than over the past 12 months. We believe there are new risks around the corner. We are very concerned about future inflation and are not fully convinced it is transitory in nature. The U.S. Treasury is issuing a large quantity of bonds, the Fed is purchasing a large quantity of bonds, and we continue to monitor closely the duration and credit composition of our fixed-income investments. There are many unknowns, and despite some optimism, we continue to monitor the situation very carefully.
 

Multi-Asset Funds  |  9


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Wells Fargo Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund

Investment objective The Fund seeks a combination of current income and capital appreciation.
Manager Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC
Subadviser Wells Capital Management Incorporated
Portfolio managers Kandarp R. Acharya, CFA®, FRM, Christian L. Chan, CFA®, Travis L. Keshemberg, CFA®, CIPM, FRM
    
Average annual total returns (%) as of May 31, 2021
    Including sales charge   Excluding sales charge   Expense ratios1 (%)
  Inception date 1 year 5 year 10 year   1 year 5 year 10 year   Gross Net 2
Class A (WMBGX)3 2-10-2017 9.37 6.69 5.04   16.04 7.96 5.66   1.10 1.08
Class C (WMBFX)4 9-30-2004 14.17 7.28 5.33   15.17 7.28 5.33   1.85 1.83
Institutional Class (WMBZX)5 7-31-2018   16.44 8.17 5.77   0.77 0.75
Spectrum Conservative Growth Blended Index6   14.38 8.04 6.67  
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index7   -0.40 3.25 3.29  
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. TIPS Index8   7.05 4.48 3.42  
ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Constrained Index9   15.13 7.22 6.24  
MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net)10   42.78 10.88 5.36  
Russell 3000® Index11   43.91 17.36 14.21  
Figures quoted represent past performance, which is no guarantee of future results, and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder may pay on an investment in a fund. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance shown without sales charges would be lower if sales charges were reflected. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted, which assumes the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. Current month-end performance is available on the Fund’s website, wfam.com.
Index returns do not include transaction costs associated with buying and selling securities, any mutual fund fees or expenses, or any taxes. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
For Class A shares, the maximum front-end sales charge is 5.75%. For Class C shares, the maximum contingent deferred sales charge is 1.00%. Performance including a contingent deferred sales charge assumes the sales charge for the corresponding time period. Institutional Class shares are sold without a front-end sales charge or contingent deferred sales charge.
1 Reflects the expense ratios as stated in the most recent prospectuses, which include the impact of 0.33% in acquired fund fees and expenses. Net expenses from affiliated master portfolios are included in the acquired fund fees and expense amount. The expense ratios shown are subject to change and may differ from the annualized expense ratios shown in the financial highlights of this report, which do not include acquired fund fees and expenses.
2 The manager has contractually committed through September 30, 2021, to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers at 0.75% for Class A, 1.50% for Class C, and 0.42% for Institutional Class. Brokerage commissions, stamp duty fees, interest, taxes, acquired fund fees and expenses (if any), net expenses from affiliated master portfolios, and extraordinary expenses are excluded from the expense caps. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. Without these caps, the Fund’s returns would have been lower. The expense ratio paid by an investor is the net expense ratio (the total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers) as stated in the prospectuses.
3 Historical performance for the Class A shares prior to their inception reflects the performance of the Class C shares and includes the higher expenses applicable to the Class C shares. If these expenses had not been included, returns for the Class A shares would be higher.
4 Prior to February 13, 2017, historical performance shown for the Class C shares reflects the performance of the Fund’s predecessor WealthBuilder Portfolio share class and does not reflect the front-end sales load previously attributable to the predecessor class. The expenses for the Class C shares and the predecessor share class are similar.
5 Historical performance shown for the Institutional Class shares prior to their inception reflects the performance of the Class A shares adjusted to reflect that the Institutional Class shares do not have a sales load but not adjusted to reflect the Institutional Class expenses. If these expenses had been included, returns for the Institutional Class shares would be higher.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.

10  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Wells Fargo Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund (continued)

Growth of $10,000 investment as of May 31, 20211
1 The chart compares the performance of Class A shares for the most recent ten years with the Spectrum Conservative Growth Blended Index, Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, Bloomberg Barclays U.S. TIPS Index, ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Constrained Index, MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net) and Russell 3000® Index. The chart assumes a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in Class A shares and reflects all operating expenses and assumes the maximum initial sales charge of 5.75%.
Footnotes continued from previous page
6 Source: Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC. Spectrum Conservative Growth Blended Index is composed 41% of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, 20% of the Russell 3000® Index, 15% of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. TIPS Index, 15% of the ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Constrained Index, and 9% of the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net). Effective November 2, 2020, the WealthBuilder Moderate Balanced Blended Index, which was composed 60% of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, 28% of the Russell 3000® Index, and 12% of the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net), was renamed the Spectrum Conservative Growth Blended Index. You cannot invest directly in an index.
7 The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based benchmark that measures the investment-grade, U.S. dollar– denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage pass-throughs), asset-backed securities, and commercial mortgage-backed securities. You cannot invest directly in an index.
8 The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) Index is an index of inflation-indexed-linked U.S. Treasury securities. You cannot invest directly in an index.
9 The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Constrained Index is a market-value-weighted index of all domestic and Yankee high-yield bonds, including deferred interest bonds and payment-in-kind securities. Issues included in the index have maturities of one year or more and have a credit rating lower than BBB-/Baa3 but are not in default. The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Constrained Index limits any individual issuer to a maximum of 2% benchmark exposure. You cannot invest directly in an index. Copyright 2021. ICE Data Indices, LLC. All rights reserved.
10 The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) All Country World Index (ACWI) ex USA Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed and emerging markets, excluding the United States. Source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indexes or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI. You cannot invest directly in an index.
11 The Russell 3000® Index measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization, which represents approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market. You cannot invest directly in an index.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  11


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Wells Fargo Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund (continued)

Balanced funds may invest in stocks and bonds. Stock values fluctuate in response to the activities of individual companies and general market and economic conditions. Bond values fluctuate in response to the financial condition of individual issuers, general market and economic conditions, and changes in interest rates. Changes in market conditions and government policies may lead to periods of heightened volatility in the bond market and reduced liquidity for certain bonds held by the Fund. In general, when interest rates rise, bond values fall and investors may lose principal value. Interest rate changes and their impact on the Fund and its share price can be sudden and unpredictable. The Fund will indirectly be exposed to all of the risks of an investment in the underlying funds and will indirectly bear expenses of the underlying funds. The use of derivatives may reduce returns and/or increase volatility. Certain investment strategies tend to increase the total risk of an investment (relative to the broader market). This fund is exposed to alternative investment risk, foreign investment risk, high-yield securities risk, mortgage- and asset-backed securities risk, and smaller-company investment risk. Consult the Fund’s prospectus for additional information on these and other risks.

12  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Wells Fargo Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund (continued)

MANAGER'S DISCUSSION
Fund highlights
The Fund outperformed the Spectrum Conservative Growth Blended Index for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021.
The Tactical Asset Allocation (TAA) overlay was the largest contributor to relative performance over the period.
The Dynamic Risk Hedging (DRH) overlay was the largest detractor from relative performance over the period.
Stock markets posted remarkable gains as the world recuperated from the pandemic; the same is not true for the fixed-income markets.
The 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021, saw strong results from the broad U.S. equity markets, as illustrated by the Russell 3000® Index’s return of 43.91%. The broad foreign markets also did well, as reflected by the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net)'s return of 42.78%. The broad U.S. fixed-income market, as represented by the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, posted a slightly negative return of -0.40%. However, that result does not show the dichotomy within the fixed-income markets. Long-maturity U.S. Treasury bonds, as captured by the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index*, declined 13.85% as long-term Treasury yields rose over the period. In contrast, high-yield bonds, as shown by the ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index**, advanced 15.18% as credit spreads compressed over the period. Aided by unprecedented levels of monetary and fiscal stimulus, the economy staged an impressive recovery from the pandemic contraction and risky assets performed very well.
Portfolio management modernized the asset allocation approach employed in the Fund.
On November 1, 2020, we employed an updated asset allocation approach. Historically, the Fund allocated a fixed percentage to domestic and international stocks. The allocation is now viewed through a lens that manages risk by balancing exposures to growth, rates, and inflation factors. To help facilitate these changes, we increased our underlying exposure to factor- and passive-based investments within the Fund over the period.
Ten largest holdings (%) as of May 31, 20211
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio 15.87
Wells Fargo Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate ex-Corporate Portfolio 11.98
Wells Fargo Disciplined Large Cap Portfolio 10.25
Wells Fargo Income Plus Fund Institutional Class 8.98
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio 6.24
Wells Fargo Strategic Retirement Bond Portfolio 6.23
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio 5.35
PIMCO CommodityRealReturn Strategy Fund Institutional Class 4.47
Wells Fargo Diversified Income Builder Fund Class R6 3.48
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF 3.16
1 Figures represent the percentage of the Fund's net assets. Holdings are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
The Fund’s TAA overlay was active throughout the year. On the heels of the large pandemic-related equity market sell-off that occurred just prior to the start of the period, we established a number of positions that gave us exposure to risky assets. Over the entire period, TAA activity contributed about 119 basis points (bps; 100 bps equal 1.00%) to performance. At the start of the period, we held a long position in an S&P 500 futures contract along with a paired trade that returned the excess performance of the Nasdaq 100 Index***over the S&P 500 Index We closed both of these trades in July 2020. In August 2020, we established a long position in a Nasdaq 100 contract and closed the trade in February 2021. In September 2020, we established a long position in U.S. industrials stocks and sold it in May 2021. In March 2021, we reestablished the long position in the S&P 500 futures contract and it was still in place at the end of the
 

* The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index measures U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate, nominal debt issued by the U.S. Treasury with 20+ years to maturity. Treasury bills are excluded by the maturity constraint, but are part of a separate Short Treasury Index. STRIPS are excluded from the index because their inclusion would result in double-counting. You cannot invest directly in an index.
** The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index of domestic and Yankee high-yield bonds. The index tracks the performance of high-yield securities traded in the U.S. bond market. You cannot invest directly in an index. Copyright 2021. ICE Data Indices, LLC. All rights reserved.

* The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index measures U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate, nominal debt issued by the U.S. Treasury with 20+ years to maturity. Treasury bills are excluded by the maturity constraint, but are part of a separate Short Treasury Index. STRIPS are excluded from the index because their inclusion would result in double-counting. You cannot invest directly in an index.
*** The Nasdaq 100 Index is an unmanaged group of the 100 biggest companies listed on the Nasdaq Composite Index. The list is updated quarterly, and companies on this index are typically representative of technology-related industries, such as computer hardware and software products, telecommunications, biotechnology, and retail/wholesale trade. You cannot invest directly in an index.

* The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index measures U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate, nominal debt issued by the U.S. Treasury with 20+ years to maturity. Treasury bills are excluded by the maturity constraint, but are part of a separate Short Treasury Index. STRIPS are excluded from the index because their inclusion would result in double-counting. You cannot invest directly in an index.
The S&P 500 Index consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. It is a market-value-

Multi-Asset Funds  |  13


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Wells Fargo Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund (continued)

period. While the aforementioned trades contributed to performance, the trades listed below detracted from performance. At the start of the period, we held a short British pound position. We closed this trade in late July 2020. At the start of the period, we also held a paired trade long the S&P 500 futures contract and short the Russell 2000 futures contract. We closed this trade in August 2020. In July 2020, we established another paired trade that was long the S&P 500 futures contract and short the Nikkei futures contract. We closed this trade in November 2020.
The DRH activity employed within the Fund detracted around 78 bps from performance. DRH has two components, Put Replication Overlay (PRO), which tends to focus on tail-risk management, and Volatility Management Overlay (VMO), which manages overall volatility within the portfolio. The Chicago Board Options Exchange Market Volatility Index (VIX)* (a proxy for market volatility) started the period at 27 but ended near 17 as markets regained their footing (higher number values represent higher volatility). While volatility declined over the period, there were some short-lived swings. With respect to PRO, on average, -0.02% of the equity portfolio was hedged over the year; the max hedge of -1.0% was reached on June 15. Outside of the first few weeks of the period, PRO tended to be dormant for the bulk of the year. Over the entire period, PRO detracted 2 bps from performance. With respect to VMO, the short-lived spikes in volatility caused the VMO overlay to go short numerous times this year. As the markets enjoyed incredibly strong performance, this hedging activity detracted from performance. Over the entire period, VMO detracted 76 bps from performance.
Allocation (%) as of May 31, 2021
  Neutral
allocation
Effective
allocation1
Bond Funds 54 53
Stock Funds 28 33
Inflation Sensitive Funds 14 14
Alternative Investment Funds 4 2
Effective Cash 0 (2)
1 Effective allocation includes the effect of any tactical futures overlay that may be in place. Effective cash, if any, represents the net offset to such future positions. These amounts are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
The majority of the fixed-income portfolio did well on a relative basis. Our allocation to a strategy portfolio that has tremendous freedom to invest across various fixed-income sectors did exceptionally well. However, the segment of the portfolio that concentrates on higher-quality high-yield investments detracted from performance on a relative basis as the lowest-quality bonds performed very well. The strong rally in commodity prices helped the broad alternatives category add to performance over the period. Early in the period, our factor-enhanced equity investments tended to underperform on a relative basis; this was the largest detractor from performance. Late in the period, our actively managed growth equity investments underperformed on a relative basis, which also detracted from performance.
Looking ahead, we are guardedly optimistic.
The massive amount of uncertainty we faced last year at this time has faded. While the daunting impacts of the virus, U.S. civil unrest, domestic politics, and geopolitical tensions are still very fresh in our mind’s eye, we increasingly see these issues in the rear-view mirror. The rollout of the vaccine, the reduction of political rhetoric, and a very accommodative Federal Reserve Board (Fed) have all helped calm fears. While COVID-19 cases are declining and America is returning to work, we are focused on understanding the economic impacts of the recent unprecedented monetary and fiscal policy effects on the portfolio. While we expect equity markets will continue to advance over the next 12 months, it may be at a much slower pace than over the past 12 months. We believe there are new risks around the corner. We are very concerned about future inflation and we are not fully convinced it is transitory in nature. The U.S. Treasury is issuing a large quantity of bonds, the Fed is purchasing a large quantity of bonds, and we continue to monitor closely the duration and credit composition of our fixed-income investments. There are many unknowns, and despite some optimism, we continue to monitor the situation very carefully.
 
weighted index with each stock's weight in the index proportionate to its market value. You cannot invest directly in an index.
* The Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) Market Volatility Index (VIX) is a popular measure of the implied volatility of S&P 500 Index options. It represents one measure of the market's expectation of stock market volatility over the next 30-day period. You cannot invest directly in an index.

14  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Wells Fargo Spectrum Growth Fund

Investment objective The Fund seeks capital appreciation with a secondary emphasis on current income.
Manager Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC
Subadviser Wells Capital Management Incorporated
Portfolio managers Kandarp R. Acharya, CFA®, FRM, Christian L. Chan, CFA®, Travis L. Keshemberg, CFA®, CIPM, FRM
    
Average annual total returns (%) as of May 31, 2021
    Including sales charge   Excluding sales charge   Expense ratios1 (%)
  Inception date 1 year 5 year 10 year   1 year 5 year 10 year   Gross Net 2
Class A (WGAFX)3 2-10-2017 20.52 10.99 8.04   27.87 12.31 8.68   1.10 1.06
Class C (WGCFX)4 9-30-2004 25.86 11.63 8.35   26.86 11.63 8.35   1.85 1.81
Institutional Class (WGAYX)5 7-31-2018   28.25 12.49 8.77   0.77 0.73
Spectrum Growth Blended Index6   27.74 12.08 9.53  
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index7   -0.40 3.25 3.29  
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. TIPS Index8   7.05 4.48 3.42  
ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Constrained Index9   15.13 7.22 6.24  
MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net)10   42.78 10.88 5.36  
Russell 3000® Index11   43.91 17.36 14.21  
Figures quoted represent past performance, which is no guarantee of future results, and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder may pay on an investment in a fund. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance shown without sales charges would be lower if sales charges were reflected. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted, which assumes the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. Current month-end performance is available on the Fund’s website, wfam.com.
Please keep in mind that high double-digit returns were primarily achieved during favorable market conditions. You should not expect that such favorable returns can be consistently achieved. A fund’s performance, especially for short time periods, should not be the sole factor in making your investment decision.
Index returns do not include transaction costs associated with buying and selling securities, any mutual fund fees or expenses, or any taxes. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
For Class A shares, the maximum front-end sales charge is 5.75%. For Class C shares, the maximum contingent deferred sales charge is 1.00%. Performance including a contingent deferred sales charge assumes the sales charge for the corresponding time period. Institutional Class shares are sold without a front-end sales charge or contingent deferred sales charge.
1 Reflects the expense ratios as stated in the most recent prospectuses, which include the impact of 0.31% in acquired fund fees and expenses. Net expenses from affiliated master portfolios are included in the acquired fund fees and expense amount. The expense ratios shown are subject to change and may differ from the annualized expense ratios shown in the financial highlights of this report, which do not include acquired fund fees and expenses.
2 The manager has contractually committed through September 30, 2021, to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers at 0.75% for Class A, 1.50% for Class C, and 0.42% for Institutional Class. Brokerage commissions, stamp duty fees, interest, taxes, acquired fund fees and expenses (if any), net expenses from affiliated master portfolios, and extraordinary expenses are excluded from the expense caps. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. Without these caps, the Fund’s returns would have been lower. The expense ratio paid by an investor is the net expense ratio (the total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers) as stated in the prospectuses.
3 Historical performance for the Class A shares prior to their inception reflects the performance of the Class C shares and includes the higher expenses applicable to the Class C shares. If these expenses had not been included, returns for the Class A shares would be higher.
4 Prior to February 13, 2017, historical performance shown for the Class C shares reflects the performance of the Fund’s predecessor WealthBuilder Portfolio share class and does not reflect the front-end sales load previously attributable to the predecessor class. The expenses for the Class C shares and the predecessor share class are similar.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  15


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Wells Fargo Spectrum Growth Fund (continued)

Growth of $10,000 investment as of May 31, 20211
1 The chart compares the performance of Class A shares for the most recent ten years with the Spectrum Growth Blended Index, Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, Bloomberg Barclays U.S. TIPS Index, ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Constrained Index, MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net) and Russell 3000® Index. The chart assumes a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in Class A shares and reflects all operating expenses and assumes the maximum initial sales charge of 5.75%.
Footnotes continued from previous page
5 Historical performance shown for the Institutional Class shares prior to their inception reflects the performance of the Class A shares adjusted to reflect that the Institutional Class shares do not have a sales load but not adjusted to reflect the Institutional Class expenses. If these expenses had been included, returns for the Institutional Class shares would be higher.
6 Source: Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC. Spectrum Growth Blended Index is composed 40% of the Russell 3000® Index, 17% of the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net), 15% of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, 14% of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. TIPS Index, and 14% of the ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Constrained Index. Effective November 2, 2020, the WealthBuilder Growth Allocation Blended Index, which was composed 56% of the Russell 3000®Index, 24% of the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net), and 20% of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, was renamed the Spectrum Growth Blended Index. You cannot invest directly in an index.
7 The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based benchmark that measures the investment-grade, U.S. dollar– denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage pass-throughs), asset-backed securities, and commercial mortgage-backed securities. You cannot invest directly in an index.
8 The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) Index is an index of inflation-indexed-linked U.S. Treasury securities. You cannot invest directly in an index.
9 The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Constrained Index is a market-value-weighted index of all domestic and Yankee high-yield bonds, including deferred interest bonds and payment-in-kind securities. Issues included in the index have maturities of one year or more and have a credit rating lower than BBB-/Baa3 but are not in default. The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Constrained Index limits any individual issuer to a maximum of 2% benchmark exposure. You cannot invest directly in an index. Copyright 2021. ICE Data Indices, LLC. All rights reserved.
10 The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) All Country World Index (ACWI) ex USA Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed and emerging markets, excluding the United States. Source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indexes or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI. You cannot invest directly in an index.
11 The Russell 3000® Index measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization, which represents approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market. You cannot invest directly in an index.

16  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Wells Fargo Spectrum Growth Fund (continued)

Balanced funds may invest in stocks and bonds. Stock values fluctuate in response to the activities of individual companies and general market and economic conditions. Bond values fluctuate in response to the financial condition of individual issuers, general market and economic conditions, and changes in interest rates. Changes in market conditions and government policies may lead to periods of heightened volatility in the bond market and reduced liquidity for certain bonds held by the Fund. In general, when interest rates rise, bond values fall and investors may lose principal value. Interest rate changes and their impact on the Fund and its share price can be sudden and unpredictable. The Fund will indirectly be exposed to all of the risks of an investment in the underlying funds and will indirectly bear expenses of the underlying funds. The use of derivatives may reduce returns and/or increase volatility. Certain investment strategies tend to increase the total risk of an investment (relative to the broader market). This fund is exposed to alternative investment risk, foreign investment risk, high-yield securities risk, mortgage- and asset-backed securities risk, and smaller-company investment risk. Consult the Fund’s prospectus for additional information on these and other risks.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  17


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Wells Fargo Spectrum Growth Fund (continued)

MANAGER'S DISCUSSION
Fund highlights
The Fund (Class A, excluding sales charges) outperformed its benchmark, Spectrum Growth Blended Index for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021.
The Tactical Asset Allocation (TAA) overlay was the largest contributor to relative performance over the period.
The Dynamic Risk Hedging (DRH) overlay was the largest detractor from relative performance over the period.
Stock markets posted remarkable gains as the world recuperated from the pandemic.
The 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021, saw strong results from the broad U.S. equity markets, as illustrated by the Russell 3000® Index’s return of 43.91%. The broad foreign markets also did well, as reflected by the MSCI ACWI ex-USA Index’s return of 42.78%. The broad U.S. fixed-income market, as represented by the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, posted a slightly negative return of -0.40%. However, that result does not show the dichotomy within the fixed-income markets. Long-maturity U.S. Treasury bonds, as captured by the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index*, declined 13.85% as long-term Treasury yields rose over the period. In contrast, high-yield bonds, as shown by the ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index**, advanced 15.18% as credit spreads compressed over the period. Aided by unprecedented levels of monetary and fiscal stimulus, the economy staged an impressive recovery from the pandemic contraction, and risky assets performed very well.
Portfolio management modernized the asset allocation approach employed in the Fund.
On November 1, 2020, we employed an updated asset allocation approach. Historically, the Fund allocated a fixed percentage to domestic and international stocks. The allocation is now viewed through a lens that manages risk by balancing exposures to growth, rates, and inflation factors. To help facilitate these changes, we increased our underlying exposure to factor- and passive-based investments within the Fund over the period.
Ten largest holdings (%) as of May 31, 20211
Wells Fargo Disciplined Large Cap Portfolio 18.50
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio 11.78
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF 6.47
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio 6.21
Wells Fargo Strategic Retirement Bond Portfolio 6.21
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Equity Portfolio 5.89
Wells Fargo Income Plus Fund Institutional Class 5.16
PIMCO CommodityRealReturn Strategy Fund Institutional Class 4.45
Wells Fargo High Yield Bond Fund Institutional Class 3.90
Wells Fargo Diversified Income Builder Fund Class R6 3.45
1 Figures represent the percentage of the Fund's net assets. Holdings are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
The Fund’s TAA overlay was active throughout the year. On the heels of the large pandemic-related equity market sell-off that occurred just prior to the start of the period, we established a number of positions that gave us exposure to risky assets. Over the entire period, TAA activity contributed about 117 basis points (bps; 100 bps equal 1.00%) to performance. At the start of the period, we held a long position in an S&P 500 futures contract along with a paired trade that returned the excess performance of the Nasdaq 100 Index*** over the S&P 500 Index. We closed both of these trades in July 2020. In August 2020, we established a long position in a Nasdaq 100 contract and closed the trade in February 2021. In September 2020, we established a long position in U.S. industrials stocks and sold it in May 2021. In March 2021, we reestablished the long position in the S&P
 

* The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index measures U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate, nominal debt issued by the U.S. Treasury with 20+ years to maturity. Treasury bills are excluded by the maturity constraint, but are part of a separate Short Treasury Index. STRIPS are excluded from the index because their inclusion would result in double-counting. You cannot invest directly in an index.
** The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index of domestic and Yankee high-yield bonds. The index tracks the performance of high-yield securities traded in the U.S. bond market. You cannot invest directly in an index. Copyright 2021. ICE Data Indices, LLC. All rights reserved.

* The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index measures U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate, nominal debt issued by the U.S. Treasury with 20+ years to maturity. Treasury bills are excluded by the maturity constraint, but are part of a separate Short Treasury Index. STRIPS are excluded from the index because their inclusion would result in double-counting. You cannot invest directly in an index.
*** The Nasdaq 100 Index is an unmanaged group of the 100 biggest companies listed on the Nasdaq Composite Index. The list is updated quarterly, and companies on this index are typically representative of technology-related industries, such as computer hardware and software products, telecommunications, biotechnology, and retail/wholesale trade. You cannot invest directly in an index

* The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index measures U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate, nominal debt issued by the U.S. Treasury with 20+ years to maturity. Treasury bills are excluded by the maturity constraint, but are part of a separate Short Treasury Index. STRIPS are excluded from the index because their inclusion would result in double-counting. You cannot invest directly in an index.
The S&P 500 Index consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. It is a market-value-weighted index with each stock’s weight in the index proportionate to its market value. You cannot invest directly in an index.

18  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Wells Fargo Spectrum Growth Fund (continued)

500 futures contract and it was still in place at the end of the period. While the aforementioned trades contributed to performance, the trades listed below detracted from performance. At the start of the period, we held a short British pound position. We closed this trade in late July 2020. At the start of the period, we also held a paired trade long the S&P 500 futures contract and short the Russell 2000 futures contract. We closed this trade in August 2020. In July 2020, we established another paired trade that was long the S&P 500 futures contract and short the Nikkei futures contract. We closed this trade in November 2020.
The DRH activity employed within the Fund detracted around 156 bps from performance. DRH has two components, Put Replication Overlay (PRO), which tends to focus on tail-risk management, and Volatility Management Overlay (VMO), which manages overall volatility within the portfolio.The Chicago Board Options Exchange Market Volatility Index (VIX)* (a proxy for market volatility) started the period at 27 but ended near 17 as markets regained their footing (higher number values represent higher volatility). While volatility declined over the period, there were some short-lived swings. With respect to PRO, on average, -0.02% of the equity portfolio was hedged over the year; the max hedge of -1.0% was reached on June 15. Outside of the first few weeks of the period, PRO tended to be dormant for the bulk of the year. Over the entire period, PRO detracted 4 bps from performance. With respect to VMO, the short-lived spikes in volatility caused the VMO overlay to go short numerous times this year. As the markets enjoyed incredibly strong performance, this hedging activity detracted from performance. Over the entire period, VMO detracted 152 bps from performance.
Allocation (%) as of May 31, 2021
  Neutral
allocation
Effective
allocation1
Stock Funds 58 63
Bond Funds 24 24
Inflation Sensitive Funds 15 14
Alternative Investment Funds 3 1
Effective Cash 0 (2)
1 Effective allocation includes the effect of any tactical futures overlay that may be in place. Effective cash, if any, represents the net offset to such future positions. These amounts are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
Early in the period, our factor-enhanced equity investments tended to underperform on a relative basis. This was the largest detractor from performance. Late in the period, our actively managed growth equity investments underperformed on a relative basis, which also detracted from performance. Within the fixed-income portfolio, the area of the portfolio that concentrates on higher-quality high-yield investments detracted from performance on a relative basis. The strong rally in commodity prices helped the broad alternatives category add to performance over the period.
Looking ahead, we are guardedly optimistic.
The massive amount of uncertainty we faced last year at this time has faded. While the daunting impacts of the virus, U.S. civil unrest, domestic politics, and geopolitical tensions are still very fresh in our mind’s eye, we increasingly see these issues in the rear-view mirror. The rollout of the vaccine, the reduction of political rhetoric, and a very accommodative Federal Reserve Board (Fed) have all helped calm fears. While COVID-19 cases are declining and America is returning to work, we are focused on understanding the economic impacts of the recent unprecedented monetary and fiscal policy effects on the portfolio. While we expect equity markets will continue to advance over the next 12 months, it may be at a much slower pace than over the past 12 months. We believe there are new risks around the corner. We are very concerned about future inflation and we are not fully convinced it is transitory in nature. The U.S. Treasury is issuing a large quantity of bonds, the Fed is purchasing a large quantity of bonds, and we continue to monitor closely the duration and credit composition of our fixed-income investments. There are many unknowns, and despite some optimism, we continue to monitor the situation very carefully.
 

* The Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) Market Volatility Index (VIX) is a popular measure of the implied volatility of S&P 500 Index options. It represents one measure of the market's expectation of stock market volatility over the next 30-day period. You cannot invest directly in an index.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  19


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Wells Fargo Spectrum Income Allocation Fund

Investment objective The Fund seeks current income with a secondary emphasis on capital appreciation.
Manager Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC
Subadviser Wells Capital Management Incorporated
Portfolio managers Kandarp R. Acharya, CFA®, FRM, Christian L. Chan, CFA®, Travis L. Keshemberg, CFA®, CIPM, FRM
    
Average annual total returns (%) as of May 31, 2021
    Including sales charge   Excluding sales charge   Expense ratios1 (%)
  Inception date 1 year 5 year 10 year   1 year 5 year 10 year   Gross Net 2
Class A (WCAFX)3 2-10-2017 1.86 4.02 3.06   8.07 5.26 3.67   1.11 1.06
Class C (WCCFX)4 9-30-2004 6.25 4.54 3.31   7.25 4.54 3.31   1.86 1.81
Institutional Class (WCYFX)5 7-31-2018   8.51 5.44 3.76   0.78 0.73
Spectrum Income Allocation Blended Index6   6.24 5.56 4.96  
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index7   -0.40 3.25 3.29  
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. TIPS Index8   7.05 4.48 3.42  
ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Constrained Index9   15.13 7.22 6.24  
MSCI AWCI ex USA Index (Net)10   42.78 10.88 5.36  
Russell 3000® Index11   43.91 17.36 14.21  
Figures quoted represent past performance, which is no guarantee of future results, and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder may pay on an investment in a fund. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance shown without sales charges would be lower if sales charges were reflected. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted, which assumes the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. Current month-end performance is available on the Fund’s website, wfam.com.
Index returns do not include transaction costs associated with buying and selling securities, any mutual fund fees or expenses, or any taxes. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
For Class A shares, the maximum front-end sales charge is 5.75%. For Class C shares, the maximum contingent deferred sales charge is 1.00%. Performance including a contingent deferred sales charge assumes the sales charge for the corresponding time period. Institutional Class shares are sold without a front-end sales charge or contingent deferred sales charge.
1 Reflects the expense ratios as stated in the most recent prospectuses, which include the impact of 0.31% in acquired fund fees and expenses. Net expenses from affiliated master portfolios are included in the acquired fund fees and expense amount. The expense ratios shown are subject to change and may differ from the annualized expense ratios shown in the financial highlights of this report, which do not include acquired fund fees and expenses.
2 The manager has contractually committed through September 30, 2021, to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers at 0.75% for Class A, 1.50% for Class C, and 0.42% for Institutional Class. Brokerage commissions, stamp duty fees, interest, taxes, acquired fund fees and expenses (if any), net expenses from affiliated master portfolios, and extraordinary expenses are excluded from the expense caps. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. Without these caps, the Fund’s returns would have been lower. The expense ratio paid by an investor is the net expense ratio (the total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers) as stated in the prospectuses.
3 Historical performance for the Class A shares prior to their inception reflects the performance of the Class C shares and includes the higher expenses applicable to the Class C shares. If these expenses had not been included, returns for the Class A shares would be higher.
4 Prior to February 13, 2017, historical performance shown for the Class C shares reflects the performance of the Fund’s predecessor WealthBuilder Portfolio share class and does not reflect the front-end sales load previously attributable to the predecessor class. The expenses for the Class C shares and the predecessor share class are similar.
5 Historical performance shown for the Institutional Class shares prior to their inception reflects the performance of the Class A shares adjusted to reflect that the Institutional Class shares do not have a sales load but not adjusted to reflect the Institutional Class expenses. If these expenses had been included, returns for the Institutional Class shares would be higher.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.

20  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Wells Fargo Spectrum Income Allocation Fund (continued)

Growth of $10,000 investment as of May 31, 20211
1 The chart compares the performance of Class A shares for the most recent ten years with the Spectrum Income Allocation Blended Index, Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, Bloomberg Barclays U.S. TIPS Index, ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Constrained Index, MSCI AWCI ex USA Index (Net) and Russell 3000® Index. The chart assumes a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in Class A shares and reflects all operating expenses and assumes the maximum initial sales charge of 5.75%.
Footnotes continued from previous page
6 Source: Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC. Spectrum Income Allocation Blended Index is composed 65% of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, 15% of the ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Constrained Index, 10% of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. TIPS Index, 7% of the Russell 3000® Index, and 3% of the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net). Effective November 2, 2020, the WealthBuilder Conservative Allocation Blended Index, which was composed 80% of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, 14% of the Russell 3000® Index, and 6% of the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net), was renamed the Spectrum Income Allocation Blended Index. You cannot invest directly in an index.
7 The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based benchmark that measures the investment-grade, U.S. dollar– denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage pass-throughs), asset-backed securities, and commercial mortgage-backed securities. You cannot invest directly in an index.
8 The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) Index is an index of inflation-indexed-linked U.S. Treasury securities. You cannot invest directly in an index.
9 The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Constrained Index is a market-value-weighted index of all domestic and Yankee high-yield bonds, including deferred interest bonds and payment-in-kind securities. Issues included in the index have maturities of one year or more and have a credit rating lower than BBB-/Baa3 but are not in default. The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Constrained Index limits any individual issuer to a maximum of 2% benchmark exposure. You cannot invest directly in an index. Copyright 2021. ICE Data Indices, LLC. All rights reserved.
10 The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) All Country World Index (ACWI) ex USA Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed and emerging markets, excluding the United States. Source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indexes or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI. You cannot invest directly in an index.
11 The Russell 3000® Index measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization, which represents approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market. You cannot invest directly in an index.
Balanced funds may invest in stocks and bonds. Stock values fluctuate in response to the activities of individual companies and general market and economic conditions. Bond values fluctuate in response to the financial condition of individual issuers, general market and economic conditions, and changes in interest rates. Changes in market conditions and government policies may lead to periods of heightened volatility in the bond market and reduced liquidity for certain bonds held by the Fund. In general, when interest rates rise, bond values fall and investors may lose principal value. Interest rate changes and their impact on the Fund and its share price can be sudden and unpredictable. The Fund will indirectly be exposed to all of the risks of an investment in the underlying funds and will indirectly bear expenses of the underlying funds. The use of derivatives may reduce returns and/or increase volatility. Certain investment strategies tend to increase the total risk of an investment (relative to the broader market). This fund is exposed to alternative investment risk, foreign investment risk, high-yield securities risk, mortgage- and asset-backed securities risk, and smaller-company investment risk. Consult the Fund’s prospectus for additional information on these and other risks.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  21


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Wells Fargo Spectrum Income Allocation Fund (continued)

MANAGER'S DISCUSSION
Fund highlights
The Fund outperformed the Spectrum Income Allocation Blended Index for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021.
The Tactical Asset Allocation (TAA) overlay was the largest contributor to relative performance over the period.
The Dynamic Risk Hedging (DRH) overlay was the largest single detractor from relative performance over the period.
Stock markets posted remarkable gains as the world recuperated from the pandemic; the same is not true for the fixed-income markets.
The 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021, saw strong results from the broad U.S. equity markets, as illustrated by the Russell 3000 Index’s® return of 43.91%. The broad foreign markets also did well, as reflected by the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net)’s return of 42.78%. The broad U.S. fixed-income market, as represented by the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, posted a slightly negative return of -0.40%. However, that result does not show the dichotomy within the fixed-income markets. Long-maturity U.S. Treasury bonds, as captured by the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index*, declined 13.85% as long-term Treasury yields rose over the period. In contrast, high-yield bonds, as shown by the ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index **, advanced 15.18% as credit spreads compressed over the period. Aided by unprecedented levels of monetary and fiscal stimulus, the economy staged an impressive recovery from the pandemic contraction and risky assets performed very well.
Portfolio management modernized the asset allocation approach employed in the Fund.
On November 1, 2020, we employed an updated asset allocation approach. Historically, the Fund allocated a fixed percentage to domestic and international stocks. The allocation is now viewed through a lens that manages risk by balancing exposures to growth, rates, and inflation factors. To help facilitate these changes, we increased our underlying exposure to factor- and passive-based investments within the Fund over the period.
Ten largest holdings (%) as of May 31, 20211
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio 32.59
Wells Fargo Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate ex-Corporate Portfolio 22.08
Wells Fargo Income Plus Fund Institutional Class 7.99
PIMCO CommodityRealReturn Strategy Fund Institutional Class 4.30
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio 3.90
Wells Fargo Strategic Retirement Bond Portfolio 3.89
Wells Fargo Disciplined Large Cap Portfolio 3.82
Wells Fargo Global Investment Grade Credit Fund Class R6 2.84
Wells Fargo Diversified Income Builder Fund Class R6 2.45
Wells Fargo High Yield Bond Fund Institutional Class 1.95
1 Figures represent the percentage of the Fund's net assets. Holdings are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
The Fund’s TAA overlay was active throughout the year. On the heels of the large pandemic-related equity market sell-off that occurred just prior to the start of the period, we established a number of positions that gave us exposure to risky assets. Over the entire period, TAA activity contributed about 120 basis points (bps; 100 bps equal 1.00%) to performance. At the start of the period, we held a long position in an S&P 500 futures contract along with a paired trade that returned the excess performance of the Nasdaq 100 Index*** over the S&P 500 Index. We closed both of these trades in July 2020. In August 2020, we established a long position in a Nasdaq 100 contract and closed the trade in February 2021. In September 2020, we established a long position in U.S. industrials stocks and sold it in May 2021. In March 2021, we reestablished the long position in the S&P 500 futures contract and it was still in place at the end of the period. While the aforementioned trades contributed to
 

* The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index measures U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate, nominal debt issued by the U.S. Treasury with 20+ years to maturity. Treasury bills are excluded by the maturity constraint, but are part of a separate Short Treasury Index. STRIPS are excluded from the index because their inclusion would result in double-counting. You cannot invest directly in an index.
** The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index of domestic and Yankee high-yield bonds. The index tracks the performance of high-yield securities traded in the U.S. bond market. You cannot invest directly in an index. Copyright 2021. ICE Data Indices, LLC. All rights reserved.

* The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index measures U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate, nominal debt issued by the U.S. Treasury with 20+ years to maturity. Treasury bills are excluded by the maturity constraint, but are part of a separate Short Treasury Index. STRIPS are excluded from the index because their inclusion would result in double-counting. You cannot invest directly in an index.
*** The Nasdaq 100 Index is an unmanaged group of the 100 biggest companies listed on the Nasdaq Composite Index. The list is updated quarterly, and companies on this index are typically representative of technology-related industries, such as computer hardware and software products, telecommunications, biotechnology, and retail/wholesale trade. You cannot invest directly in an index.

* The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index measures U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate, nominal debt issued by the U.S. Treasury with 20+ years to maturity. Treasury bills are excluded by the maturity constraint, but are part of a separate Short Treasury Index. STRIPS are excluded from the index because their inclusion would result in double-counting. You cannot invest directly in an index.
The S&P 500 Index consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. It is a market-value-weighted index with each stock's weight in the index proportionate to its market value. You cannot invest directly in an index.

22  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Wells Fargo Spectrum Income Allocation Fund (continued)

performance, the trades listed below detracted from performance. At the start of the period, we held a short British pound position. We closed this trade in late July 2020. At the start of the period, we also held a paired trade long the S&P 500 futures contract and short the Russell 2000 futures contract. We closed this trade in August 2020. In July 2020, we established another paired trade that was long the S&P 500 futures contract and short the Nikkei futures contract. We closed this trade in November 2020.
Allocation (%) as of May 31, 2021
  Neutral
allocation
Effective
allocation1
Bond Funds 77 73
Stock Funds 10 14
Alternative Investment Funds 3 2
Inflation Sensitive Funds 10 11
1 Effective allocation includes the effect of any tactical futures overlay that may be in place. Effective cash, if any, represents the net offset to such future positions. These amounts are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
The DRH activity employed within the Fund detracted around 36 bps from performance. DRH has two components, Put Replication Overlay (PRO), which tends to focus on tail-risk management, and Volatility Management Overlay (VMO), which manages overall volatility within the portfolio. The Chicago Board Options Exchange Market Volatility Index (VIX)* (a proxy for market volatility) started the period at 27 but ended near 17 as markets regained their footing (higher number values represent higher volatility). While volatility declined over the period, there were some short-lived swings. With respect to PRO, on average, -0.02% of the equity portfolio was hedged over the year; the max hedge of -1.0% was reached on June 15. Outside of the first few weeks of the period, PRO tended to be dormant for the bulk of the year. Over the entire period, PRO detracted 1 bp from performance. With respect to VMO, the short-lived spikes in volatility caused the VMO overlay to go short numerous times this year. As the markets enjoyed incredibly strong performance, this hedging activity detracted from performance. Over the entire period, VMO detracted 35 bps from performance.
The majority of the fixed-income portfolio did well on a relative basis. Our allocation to a strategy portfolio that has tremendous freedom to invest across various fixed-income sectors did exceptionally well. However, the segment of the portfolio that concentrates on higher-quality high-yield investments detracted from performance on a relative basis as the lowest-quality bonds performed very well. The strong rally in commodity prices helped the broad alternatives category add to performance over the period. Early in the period, our factor-enhanced equity investments tended to underperform on a relative basis; this was the largest detractor from performance. Late in the period, our actively managed growth equity investments underperformed on a relative basis, which also detracted from performance.
Looking ahead, we are guardedly optimistic.
The massive amount of uncertainty we faced last year at this time has faded. While the daunting impacts of the virus, U.S. civil unrest, domestic politics, and geopolitical tensions are still very fresh in our mind’s eye, we increasingly see these issues in the rear-view mirror. The rollout of the vaccine, the reduction of political rhetoric, and a very accommodative Federal Reserve Board (Fed) have all helped calm fears. While COVID-19 cases are declining and America is returning to work, we are focused on understanding the economic impacts of the recent unprecedented monetary and fiscal policy effects on the portfolio. While we expect equity markets will continue to advance over the next 12 months, it may be at a much slower pace than over the past 12 months. We believe there are new risks around the corner. We are very concerned about future inflation and we are not fully convinced it is transitory in nature. The U.S. Treasury is issuing a large quantity of bonds, the Fed is purchasing a large quantity of bonds, and we continue to monitor closely the duration and credit composition of our fixed-income investments. There are many unknowns, and despite some optimism, we continue to monitor the situation very carefully.
 

* The Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) Market Volatility Index (VIX) is a popular measure of the implied volatility of S&P 500 Index options. It represents one measure of the market's expectation of stock market volatility over the next 30-day period. You cannot invest directly in an index.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  23


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Wells Fargo Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund

Investment objective The Fund seeks a combination of capital appreciation and current income.
Manager Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC
Subadviser Wells Capital Management Incorporated
Portfolio managers Kandarp R. Acharya, CFA®, FRM, Christian L. Chan, CFA®, Travis L. Keshemberg, CFA®, CIPM, FRM
    
Average annual total returns (%) as of May 31, 2021
    Including sales charge   Excluding sales charge   Expense ratios1 (%)
  Inception date 1 year 5 year 10 year   1 year 5 year 10 year   Gross Net 2
Class A (WGBAX)3 2-10-2017 15.51 9.07 6.85   22.56 10.37 7.48   1.08 1.07
Class C (WGBFX)4 10-1-1997 20.79 9.68 7.14   21.79 9.68 7.14   1.83 1.82
Institutional Class (WGBIX)5 7-31-2018   22.99 10.56 7.57   0.75 0.74
Spectrum Moderate Growth Blended Index6   21.88 10.26 8.22  
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index7   -0.40 3.25 3.29  
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. TIPS Index8   7.05 4.48 3.42  
ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Constrained Index9   15.13 7.22 6.24  
MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net)10   42.78 10.88 5.36  
Russell 3000® Index11   43.91 17.36 14.21  
Figures quoted represent past performance, which is no guarantee of future results, and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder may pay on an investment in a fund. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance shown without sales charges would be lower if sales charges were reflected. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted, which assumes the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. Current month-end performance is available on the Fund’s website, wfam.com.
Index returns do not include transaction costs associated with buying and selling securities, any mutual fund fees or expenses, or any taxes. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
For Class A shares, the maximum front-end sales charge is 5.75%. For Class C shares, the maximum contingent deferred sales charge is 1.00%. Performance including a contingent deferred sales charge assumes the sales charge for the corresponding time period. Institutional Class shares are sold without a front-end sales charge or contingent deferred sales charge.
1 Reflects the expense ratios as stated in the most recent prospectuses, which include the impact of 0.32% in acquired fund fees and expenses. Net expenses from affiliated master portfolios are included in the acquired fund fees and expense amount. The expense ratios shown are subject to change and may differ from the annualized expense ratios shown in the financial highlights of this report, which do not include acquired fund fees and expenses.
2 The manager has contractually committed through September 30, 2021, to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers at 0.75% for Class A, 1.50% for Class C, and 0.42% for Institutional Class. Brokerage commissions, stamp duty fees, interest, taxes, acquired fund fees and expenses (if any), net expenses from affiliated master portfolios, and extraordinary expenses are excluded from the expense caps. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. Without these caps, the Fund’s returns would have been lower. The expense ratio paid by an investor is the net expense ratio (the total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers) as stated in the prospectuses.
3 Historical performance for the Class A shares prior to their inception reflects the performance of the Class C shares and includes the higher expenses applicable to the Class C shares. If these expenses had not been included, returns for the Class A shares would be higher.
4 Prior to February 13, 2017, historical performance shown for the Class C shares reflects the performance of the Fund’s predecessor WealthBuilder Portfolio share class and does not reflect the front-end sales load previously attributable to the predecessor class. The expenses for the Class C shares and the predecessor share class are similar.
5 Historical performance shown for the Institutional Class shares prior to their inception reflects the performance of the Class A shares adjusted to reflect that the Institutional Class shares do not have a sales load but not adjusted to reflect the Institutional Class expenses. If these expenses had been included, returns for the Institutional Class shares would be higher.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.

24  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Wells Fargo Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund (continued)

Growth of $10,000 investment as of May 31, 20211
1 The chart compares the performance of Class A shares for the most recent ten years with the Spectrum Moderate Growth Blended Index, Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, Bloomberg Barclays U.S. TIPS Index, ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Constrained Index, MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net) and Russell 3000® Index. The chart assumes a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in Class A shares and reflects all operating expenses and assumes the maximum initial sales charge of 5.75%.
Footnotes continued from previous page
6 Source: Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC. Spectrum Moderate Growth Blended Index is composed 32% of the Russell 3000® Index, 26% of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, 14% of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. TIPS Index, 14% of the ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Constrained Index, and 14% of the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net). Effective November 2, 2020, the WealthBuilder Growth Balanced Blended Index, which was composed of 42% of the Russell 3000® Index, 40% of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, and 18% of the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net), was renamed the Spectrum Moderate Growth Blended Index. You cannot invest directly in an index.
7 The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based benchmark that measures the investment-grade, U.S. dollar– denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage pass-throughs), asset-backed securities, and commercial mortgage-backed securities. You cannot invest directly in an index.
8 The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) Index is an index of inflation-indexed-linked U.S. Treasury securities. You cannot invest directly in an index.
9 The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Constrained Index is a market-value-weighted index of all domestic and Yankee high-yield bonds, including deferred interest bonds and payment-in-kind securities. Issues included in the index have maturities of one year or more and have a credit rating lower than BBB-/Baa3 but are not in default. The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Constrained Index limits any individual issuer to a maximum of 2% benchmark exposure. You cannot invest directly in an index. Copyright 2021. ICE Data Indices, LLC. All rights reserved.
10 The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) All Country World Index (ACWI) ex USA Index (Net) is a free-float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed and emerging markets, excluding the United States. Source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indexes or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI. You cannot invest directly in an index.
11 The Russell 3000® Index measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization, which represents approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market. You cannot invest directly in an index.
Balanced funds may invest in stocks and bonds. Stock values fluctuate in response to the activities of individual companies and general market and economic conditions. Bond values fluctuate in response to the financial condition of individual issuers, general market and economic conditions, and changes in interest rates. Changes in market conditions and government policies may lead to periods of heightened volatility in the bond market and reduced liquidity for certain bonds held by the Fund. In general, when interest rates rise, bond values fall and investors may lose principal value. Interest rate changes and their impact on the Fund and its share price can be sudden and unpredictable. The Fund will indirectly be exposed to all of the risks of an investment in the underlying funds and will indirectly bear expenses of the underlying funds. The use of derivatives may reduce returns and/or increase volatility. Certain investment strategies tend to increase the total risk of an investment (relative to the broader market). This fund is exposed to alternative investment risk, foreign investment risk, high-yield securities risk, mortgage- and asset-backed securities risk, and smaller-company investment risk. Consult the Fund’s prospectus for additional information on these and other risks.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  25


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Wells Fargo Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund (continued)

MANAGER'S DISCUSSION
Fund highlights
The Fund (Class A, excluding sales charges) outperformed its benchmark, Spectrum Moderate Growth Blended Index for the 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021.
The Tactical Asset Allocation (TAA) overlay was the largest contributor to relative performance over the period.
The Dynamic Risk Hedging (DRH) overlay was the largest detractor from relative performance over the period.
Stock markets posted remarkable gains as the world recuperated from the pandemic.
The 12-month period that ended May 31, 2021, saw strong results from the broad U.S. equity markets, as illustrated by the Russell 3000® Index’s return of 43.91%. The broad foreign markets also did well, as reflected by the MSCI ACWI ex-USA Index (Net)’s return of 42.78%. The broad U.S. fixed-income market, as represented by the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, posted a slightly negative return of -0.40%. However, that result does not show the dichotomy within the fixed-income markets. Long-maturity U.S. Treasury bonds, as captured by the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index*, declined 13.85% as long-term Treasury yields rose over the period. In contrast, high-yield bonds, as shown by the ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index **, advanced 15.18% as credit spreads compressed over the period. Aided by unprecedented levels of monetary and fiscal stimulus, the economy staged an impressive recovery from the pandemic contraction and risky assets performed very well.
Portfolio management modernized the asset allocation approach employed in the Fund.
On November 1, 2020, we employed an updated asset allocation approach. Historically, the Fund allocated a fixed percentage to domestic and international stocks. The allocation is now viewed through a lens that manages risk by balancing exposures to growth, rates, and inflation factors. To help facilitate these changes, we increased our underlying exposure to factor- and passive-based investments within the Fund over the period.
Ten largest holdings (%) as of May 31, 20211
Wells Fargo Disciplined Large Cap Portfolio 16.24
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio 9.44
Wells Fargo Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate ex-Corporate Portfolio 7.57
Wells Fargo Income Plus Fund Institutional Class 6.90
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio 6.31
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio 6.22
Wells Fargo Strategic Retirement Bond Portfolio 6.21
PIMCO CommodityRealReturn Strategy Fund Institutional Class 4.52
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Equity Portfolio 4.43
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF 4.07
1 Figures represent the percentage of the Fund's net assets. Holdings are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
The Fund’s TAA overlay was active throughout the year. On the heels of the large pandemic-related equity market sell-off that occurred just prior to the start of the period, we established a number of positions that gave us exposure to risky assets. Over the entire period, TAA activity contributed about 117 basis points (bps; 100 bps equal 1.00%) to performance. At the start of the period, we held a long position in an S&P 500 futures contract along with a paired trade that returned the excess performance of the Nasdaq 100 Index*** over the S&P 500 Index. We closed both of these trades in July 2020. In August 2020, we established a long position in a Nasdaq 100 contract and closed the trade in February 2021. In September 2020, we established a long position in U.S. industrials stocks and sold it in May 2021. In
 

* The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index measures U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate, nominal debt issued by the U.S. Treasury with 20+ years to maturity. Treasury bills are excluded by the maturity constraint, but are part of a separate Short Treasury Index. STRIPS are excluded from the index because their inclusion would result in double-counting. You cannot invest directly in an index.
** The ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index of domestic and Yankee high-yield bonds. The index tracks the performance of high-yield securities traded in the U.S. bond market. You cannot invest directly in an index. Copyright 2021. ICE Data Indices, LLC. All rights reserved.

* The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index measures U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate, nominal debt issued by the U.S. Treasury with 20+ years to maturity. Treasury bills are excluded by the maturity constraint, but are part of a separate Short Treasury Index. STRIPS are excluded from the index because their inclusion would result in double-counting. You cannot invest directly in an index.
*** The Nasdaq 100 Index is an unmanaged group of the 100 biggest companies listed on the Nasdaq Composite Index. The list is updated quarterly, and companies on this index are typically representative of technology-related industries, such as computer hardware and software products, telecommunications, biotechnology, and retail/wholesale trade. You cannot invest directly in an index.

* The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index measures U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate, nominal debt issued by the U.S. Treasury with 20+ years to maturity. Treasury bills are excluded by the maturity constraint, but are part of a separate Short Treasury Index. STRIPS are excluded from the index because their inclusion would result in double-counting. You cannot invest directly in an index.
The S&P 500 Index consists of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation. It is a market-value-weighted index with each stock's weight in the index proportionate to its market value. You cannot invest directly in an index.

26  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Performance highlights (unaudited)
Wells Fargo Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund (continued)

March 2021, we reestablished the long position in the S&P 500 futures contract and it was still in place at the end of the period. While the aforementioned trades contributed to performance, the trades listed below detracted from performance. At the start of the period, we held a short British pound position. We closed this trade in late July 2020. At the start of the period, we also held a paired trade long the S&P 500 futures contract and short the Russell 2000 futures contract. We closed this trade in August 2020. In July 2020, we established another paired trade that was long the S&P 500 futures contract and short the Nikkei futures contract. We closed this trade in November 2020.
Allocation (%) as of May 31, 2021
  Neutral
allocation
Effective
allocation1
Stock Funds 45 51
Bond Funds 37 35
Inflation Sensitive Funds 14 14
Alternative Investment Funds 4 2
Effective Cash 0 (2)
1 Effective allocation includes the effect of any tactical futures overlay that may be in place. Effective cash, if any, represents the net offset to such future positions. These amounts are subject to change and may have changed since the date specified.
The DRH activity employed within the Fund detracted around 118 bps from performance. DRH has two components, Put Replication Overlay (PRO), which tends to focus on tail-risk management, and Volatility Management Overlay (VMO), which manages overall volatility within the portfolio. The Chicago Board Options Exchange Market Volatility Index (VIX)* (a proxy for market volatility) started the period at 27 but ended near 17 as markets regained their footing (higher number values represent higher volatility). While volatility declined over the period, there were some short-lived swings. With respect to PRO, on average, -0.02% of the equity portfolio was hedged over the year; the max hedge of -1.0% was reached on June 15. Outside of the first few weeks of the period, PRO tended to be dormant for the bulk of the year. Over the entire period, PRO detracted 3 bps from performance. With respect to VMO, the short-lived spikes in volatility caused the VMO overlay to go short numerous times this year. As the markets enjoyed incredibly strong performance, this hedging activity detracted from performance. Over the entire period, VMO detracted 115 bps from performance.
Early in the period, our factor-enhanced equity investments tended to underperform on a relative basis. This was the largest detractor from performance. Late in the period, our actively managed growth equity investments underperformed on a relative basis, which also detracted from performance. The majority of the fixed-income portfolio did well on a relative basis. However, the segment of the portfolio that concentrates on higher-quality high-yield investments detracted from performance on a relative basis as the lowest-quality bonds performed very well. The strong rally in commodity prices helped the broad alternatives category add to performance over the period.
Looking ahead, we are guardedly optimistic.
The massive amount of uncertainty we faced last year at this time has faded. While the daunting impacts of the virus, U.S. civil unrest, domestic politics, and geopolitical tensions are still very fresh in our mind’s eye, we increasingly see these issues in the rear-view mirror. The rollout of the vaccine, the reduction of political rhetoric, and a very accommodative Federal Reserve Board (Fed) have all helped calm fears. While COVID-19 cases are declining and America is returning to work, we are focused on understanding the economic impacts of the recent unprecedented monetary and fiscal policy effects on the portfolio. While we expect equity markets will continue to advance over the next 12 months, it may be at a much slower pace than over the past 12 months. We believe there are new risks around the corner. We are very concerned about future inflation and are not fully convinced it is transitory in nature. The U.S. Treasury is issuing a large quantity of bonds, the Fed is purchasing a large quantity of bonds, and we continue to monitor closely the duration and credit composition of our fixed-income investments. There are many unknowns, and despite some optimism, we continue to monitor the situation very carefully.
 

* The Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) Market Volatility Index (VIX) is a popular measure of the implied volatility of S&P 500 Index options. It represents one measure of the market's expectation of stock market volatility over the next 30-day period. You cannot invest directly in an index.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  27


Fund expenses (unaudited)
As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and contingent deferred sales charges (if any) on redemptions and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) and/or shareholder servicing fees, and other Fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period from December 1, 2020 to May 31, 2021.
Actual expenses
The “Actual” line of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the “Actual” line under the heading entitled “Expenses paid during period” for your applicable class of shares to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes
The “Hypothetical” line of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) and contingent deferred sales charges. Therefore, the “Hypothetical” line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
  Beginning
account value
12-1-2020
Ending
account value
5-31-2021
Expenses
paid during
the period1,2
Annualized net
expense ratio2
Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund        
Class A        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,173.21 $4.06 0.75%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,021.19 $3.78 0.75%
Class C        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,168.62 $8.11 1.50%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,017.45 $7.54 1.50%
Institutional Class        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,175.07 $2.28 0.42%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,022.84 $2.12 0.42%
1 Expenses paid is equal to the annualized net expense ratio of each class multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one-half-year period).
2 Amounts do not reflect expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios in which the Fund invests.

28  |  Wells Fargo Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund


Fund expenses (unaudited)
  Beginning
account value
12-1-2020
Ending
account value
5-31-2021
Expenses
paid during
the period1,2
Annualized net
expense ratio2
Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund        
Class A        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,068.57 $3.87 0.75%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,021.19 $3.78 0.75%
Class C        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,064.57 $7.72 1.50%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,017.45 $7.54 1.50%
Institutional Class        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,070.30 $2.17 0.42%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,022.84 $2.12 0.42%
Spectrum Growth Fund        
Class A        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,125.41 $3.97 0.75%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,021.19 $3.78 0.75%
Class C        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,120.77 $7.93 1.50%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,017.45 $7.54 1.50%
Institutional Class        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,127.14 $2.23 0.42%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,022.84 $2.12 0.42%
Spectrum Income Allocation Fund        
Class A        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,024.72 $3.79 0.75%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,021.19 $3.78 0.75%
Class C        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,020.82 $7.56 1.50%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,017.45 $7.54 1.50%
Institutional Class        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,027.18 $2.12 0.42%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,022.84 $2.12 0.42%
Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund        
Class A        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,101.78 $3.93 0.75%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,021.19 $3.78 0.75%
Class C        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,097.68 $7.84 1.50%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,017.45 $7.54 1.50%
Institutional Class        
Actual $1,000.00 $1,103.30 $2.20 0.42%
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) $1,000.00 $1,022.84 $2.12 0.42%
1 Expenses paid is equal to the annualized net expense ratio of each class multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one-half-year period).
2 Amounts do not reflect expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios in which the Fund invests.

Wells Fargo Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund  |  29


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021
Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund

        Shares Value
Investment companies:  97.86%          
Affiliated master portfolios:  67.54%          
Wells Fargo Disciplined Large Cap Portfolio                 $ 124,370,990
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio                   8,395,494
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio                  10,825,494
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio                  89,831,302
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Equity Portfolio                  48,987,691
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio                  14,797,409
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio                   8,828,023
          306,036,403
Exchange-traded funds:  19.52%          
Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund          84,064   4,388,981
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF         145,566  11,179,469
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF         115,622   7,706,206
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF         126,501  53,339,148
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF         104,857  11,833,112
           88,446,916
Stock funds:  10.80%          
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6         396,108  14,081,634
Wells Fargo Endeavor Select Fund Class R6 ♠†       1,367,403  17,434,387
Wells Fargo Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 ♠†         323,732  17,452,406
           48,968,427
Total Investment companies (Cost $339,031,270)         443,451,746
    
    Yield      
Short-term investments:  0.53%          
Investment companies:  0.53%          
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class ♠∞   0.03%   2,400,000   2,400,000
Total Short-term investments (Cost $2,400,000)           2,400,000
Total investments in securities (Cost $341,431,270) 98.39%       445,851,746
Other assets and liabilities, net 1.61         7,290,561
Total net assets 100.00%       $453,142,307
    
Non-income-earning security
The issuer is an affiliate of the Fund as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The rate represents the 7-day annualized yield at period end.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

30  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021
Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund

Investments in affiliates
An affiliated investment is an investment in which the Fund owns at least 5% of the outstanding voting shares of the issuer or as a result of other relationships, such as the Fund and the issuer having the same investment manager. Transactions with issuers that were either affiliates of the Fund at the beginning of the period or the end of the period were as follows:
  Value,
beginning of
period
Purchases Sales
proceeds
Net
realized
gains
(losses) on
affiliated
Underlying
Funds
  Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses) on
affiliated
Underlying
Funds
  Value,
end of
period
  % of
net
assets
Investment companies                    
Stock funds                    
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6 $ 6,253,466 $ 7,682,286 $ (2,616,031) $ 370,326   $ 2,391,587   $ 14,081,634    
Wells Fargo Endeavor Select Fund Class R6 14,166,330 3,611,404 (3,628,659) 262,837   3,022,475   17,434,387    
Wells Fargo Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 14,167,621 5,616,028 (4,543,307) 137,068   2,074,996   17,452,406    
                48,968,427   10.80%
Short-term investments                    
Investment companies                    
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class 2,220,697 118,657,449 (118,478,146) 0   0   2,400,000   0.53
        $770,231   $7,489,058   $51,368,427   11.33%
    
Non-income-earning security
    
  Shares,
end of
period
Dividends from
affiliated
Underlying Funds
  Net realized gains
on capital gain
distributions
from affiliated
Underlying Funds
Investment companies        
Stock funds        
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6 396,108 $ 34,533   $ 0
Wells Fargo Endeavor Select Fund Class R6 1,367,403 0   1,108,576
Wells Fargo Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 323,732 0   2,001,611
Short-term investments        
Investment companies        
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class 2,400,000 1,341   0
    $35,874   $3,110,187
    
Non-income-earning security
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  31


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021
Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund

Transactions with the affiliated Master Portfolios were as follows:
  % of
ownership,
beginning
of period
% of
ownership,
end of
period
Net realized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Dividends
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Affiliated
income
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Value,
end of
period
  % of
net
assets
Wells Fargo Disciplined Large Cap Portfolio 31.68% 37.76% $ 8,961,897   $ 28,655,277   $ 1,657,652   $ 8,088   $ 124,370,990    
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio 1.53 0.88 3,232,854   (177,900)   9,485   2,344   8,395,494    
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio 8.55 5.98 1,655,808   4,998,563   530,722   264   10,825,494    
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio 7.93 12.62 7,530,368   15,340,275   2,272,321   1,332   89,831,302    
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Equity Portfolio 7.84 5.99 12,052,482   7,008,557   884,337   1,135   48,987,691    
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio 6.74 6.93 4,555,731   7,427,704   151,988   353   14,797,409    
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio 1.54 1.42 708,606   2,335,264   76,050   657   8,828,023    
      $38,697,746   $65,587,740   $5,582,555   $14,173   $306,036,403   67.54%
Futures contracts
Description Number of
contracts
Expiration
date
Notional
cost
Notional
value
Unrealized
gains
  Unrealized
losses
Long              
FTSE 100 Index 68 6-18-2021 $ 6,773,673 $ 6,785,238 $ 11,565   $ 0
IBEX 35 Index 179 6-18-2021 19,953,856 19,994,297 40,441   0
MSCI Emerging Markets Index 68 6-18-2021 4,538,161 4,627,060 88,899   0
Short              
Australian Dollars Futures (174) 6-14-2021 (13,442,154) (13,422,360) 19,794   0
Mini-DAX Futures (208) 6-18-2021 (18,494,931) (19,602,965) 0   (1,108,034)
          $160,699   $(1,108,034)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

32  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021
Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund

        Shares Value
Investment companies:  97.70%          
Affiliated master portfolios:  61.95%          
Wells Fargo Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate ex-Corporate Portfolio                 $  45,528,490
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio                  60,327,881
Wells Fargo Disciplined Large Cap Portfolio                  38,961,951
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio                   2,045,962
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio                   2,667,662
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio                  20,347,726
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Equity Portfolio                   8,920,151
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio                   3,796,078
Wells Fargo High Yield Corporate Bond Portfolio                   3,339,253
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio                  23,715,272
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio                   2,158,685
Wells Fargo Strategic Retirement Bond Portfolio                  23,699,482
          235,508,593
Alternative investment funds:  6.37%          
PIMCO CommodityRealReturn Strategy Fund Institutional Class       2,341,638  17,000,292
Wells Fargo Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class R6 ♠†         849,155   7,209,326
           24,209,618
Bond funds:  14.77%          
Wells Fargo Global Investment Grade Credit Fund Class R6       1,022,689  10,860,958
Wells Fargo High Yield Bond Fund Institutional Class       3,284,311  11,133,814
Wells Fargo Income Plus Fund Institutional Class       3,367,096  34,142,358
           56,137,130
Exchange-traded funds:  8.33%          
Aberdeen Standard Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF       59,437 1,535,852
Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund       70,109 3,660,391
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF       49,711 3,817,805
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF       31,258 2,083,346
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF       28,505 12,019,133
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF       25,650 2,894,602
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF       49,347 5,652,699
          31,663,828
Stock funds:  6.28%          
Wells Fargo Diversified Income Builder Fund Class R6       2,103,292 13,208,671
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6       89,535 3,182,955
Wells Fargo Endeavor Select Fund Class R6 ♠†       293,291 3,739,462
Wells Fargo Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 ♠†       69,363 3,739,344
          23,870,432
Total Investment companies (Cost $334,313,759)         371,389,601
    
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  33


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021
Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund

    Yield   Shares Value
Short-term investments:  0.34%          
Investment companies:  0.34%          
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class ♠∞   0.03%   1,280,700 $  1,280,700
Total Short-term investments (Cost $1,280,700)           1,280,700
Total investments in securities (Cost $335,594,459) 98.04%       372,670,301
Other assets and liabilities, net 1.96         7,462,824
Total net assets 100.00%       $380,133,125
    
Non-income-earning security
The issuer is an affiliate of the Fund as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The rate represents the 7-day annualized yield at period end.
Investments in affiliates
An affiliated investment is an investment in which the Fund owns at least 5% of the outstanding voting shares of the issuer or as a result of other relationships, such as the Fund and the issuer having the same investment manager. Transactions with issuers that were either affiliates of the Fund at the beginning of the period or the end of the period were as follows:
  Value,
beginning of
period
Purchases Sales
proceeds
Net
realized
gains
(losses) on
affiliated
Underlying
Funds
  Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses) on
affiliated
Underlying
Funds
  Value,
end of
period
  % of
net
assets
Investment companies                    
Alternative investment funds                    
Wells Fargo Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class R6 $13,783,975 $ 183,890 $ (6,809,479) $(1,579,857)   $ 1,630,797   $ 7,209,326   1.90%
Bond funds                    
Wells Fargo Global Investment Grade Credit Fund Class R6 14,693,669 1,076,939 (5,080,282) 144,279   26,353   10,860,958    
Wells Fargo High Yield Bond Fund Institutional Class 3,984,855 8,140,361 (1,411,819) (13,472)   433,889   11,133,814    
Wells Fargo Income Plus Fund Institutional Class 35,821,977 4,413,999 (8,992,538) 220,752   2,678,168   34,142,358    
                56,137,130   14.77
Stock funds                    
Wells Fargo Diversified Income Builder Fund Class R6 0 13,364,120 (1,149,143) 47,213   946,481   13,208,671    
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6 2,711,234 1,341,185 (1,756,166) 522,641   364,061   3,182,955    
Wells Fargo Endeavor Select Fund Class R6 6,165,200 266,815 (3,774,104) 618,478   463,073   3,739,462    
Wells Fargo Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 6,179,364 476,050 (3,762,622) 268,162   578,390   3,739,344    
                23,870,432   6.28
Short-term investments                    
Investment companies                    
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class 1,087,098 56,075,123 (55,881,521) 0   0   1,280,700   0.34
        $ 228,196   $7,121,212   $88,497,588   23.29%
    
Non-income-earning security
    
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

34  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021
Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund

  Shares,
end of
period
Dividends from
affiliated
Underlying Funds
  Net realized gains
on capital gain
distributions
from affiliated
Underlying Funds
Investment companies        
Alternative investment funds        
Wells Fargo Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class R6 849,155 $ 0   $ 0
Bond funds        
Wells Fargo Global Investment Grade Credit Fund Class R6 1,022,689 374,849   249,175
Wells Fargo High Yield Bond Fund Institutional Class 3,284,311 304,511   0
Wells Fargo Income Plus Fund Institutional Class 3,367,096 1,446,432   0
Stock funds        
Wells Fargo Diversified Income Builder Fund Class R6 2,103,292 311,013   0
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6 89,535 8,038   0
Wells Fargo Endeavor Select Fund Class R6 293,291 0   259,473
Wells Fargo Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 69,363 0   465,149
Short-term investments        
Investment companies        
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class 1,280,700 627   0
    $2,445,470   $973,797
    
Non-income-earning security
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  35


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021
Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund

Transactions with the affiliated Master Portfolios were as follows:
  % of
ownership,
beginning
of period
% of
ownership,
end of
period
Net realized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Interest
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Dividends
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Affiliated
income
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Value,
end of
period
  % of
net
assets
Wells Fargo Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate ex-Corporate Portfolio 8.64% 7.80% $ 582,179   $ (2,194,013)   $ 676,600   $ 0   $ 1,859   $ 45,528,490    
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio 1.08 1.07 1,890,277   (2,396,692)   1,044,862   0   2,076   60,327,881    
Wells Fargo Disciplined Large Cap Portfolio 13.67 11.83 3,198,821   10,387,553   0   669,080   2,942   38,961,951    
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio 0.67 0.21 1,642,025   (443,177)   0   3,212   788   2,045,962    
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio 3.71 1.47 543,390   1,571,598   0   151,564   77   2,667,662    
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio 3.42 2.86 2,089,884   3,976,769   0   563,648   0   20,347,726    
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Equity Portfolio 3.38 1.09 3,653,564   613,905   0   271,955   282   8,920,151    
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio 2.94 1.78 1,298,464   2,198,628   0   55,005   85   3,796,078    
Wells Fargo High Yield Corporate Bond Portfolio 2.33 6.66 68,596   202,084   208,988   0   29   3,339,253    
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio 7.25 9.91 244,800   992,483   499,618   62,218   226   23,715,272    
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio 0.67 0.35 231,454   690,543   0   29,277   212   2,158,685    
Wells Fargo Strategic Retirement Bond Portfolio 0.00 15.45 202,327   (27,792)   209,109   0   64   23,699,482    
      $15,645,781   $15,571,889   $2,639,177   $1,805,959   $8,640   $235,508,593   61.95%
Futures contracts
Description Number of
contracts
Expiration
date
Notional
cost
Notional
value
Unrealized
gains
  Unrealized
losses
Long              
Bloomberg Commodity Index 500 6-16-2021 $ 4,566,465 $ 4,635,000 $ 68,535   $ 0
E-Mini S&P 500 Index 59 6-18-2021 12,451,240 12,397,080 0   (54,160)
FTSE 100 Index 57 6-18-2021 5,677,932 5,687,626 9,694   0
IBEX 35 Index 170 6-18-2021 18,950,716 18,988,997 38,281   0
MSCI Emerging Markets Index 58 6-18-2021 3,870,784 3,946,610 75,826   0
Short              
Australian Dollars Futures (148) 6-14-2021 (11,433,556) (11,416,720) 16,836   0
Mini-DAX Futures (196) 6-18-2021 (17,427,916) (18,472,025) 0   (1,044,109)
          $209,172   $(1,098,269)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

36  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021
Spectrum Growth Fund

        Shares Value
Investment companies:  97.69%          
Affiliated master portfolios:  57.78%          
Wells Fargo Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate ex-Corporate Portfolio                 $   6,409,459
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio                   2,040,171
Wells Fargo Disciplined Large Cap Portfolio                  55,539,023
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio                   3,064,981
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio                   4,466,073
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio                  35,375,313
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Equity Portfolio                  17,676,401
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio                   5,701,747
Wells Fargo High Yield Corporate Bond Portfolio                   2,625,931
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio                  18,660,387
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio                   3,288,716
Wells Fargo Strategic Retirement Bond Portfolio                  18,641,791
          173,489,993
Alternative investment funds:  5.74%          
PIMCO CommodityRealReturn Strategy Fund Institutional Class       1,842,560  13,376,985
Wells Fargo Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class R6 ♠†         454,642   3,859,909
           17,236,894
Bond funds:  11.79%          
Wells Fargo Global Investment Grade Credit Fund Class R6         772,890   8,208,087
Wells Fargo High Yield Bond Fund Institutional Class       3,455,365  11,713,687
Wells Fargo Income Plus Fund Institutional Class       1,527,055  15,484,337
           35,406,111
Exchange-traded funds:  13.37%          
Aberdeen Standard Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF       46,804 1,209,415
Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund       53,994 2,819,027
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF       50,910 3,909,888
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF       48,271 3,217,262
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF       46,100 19,438,065
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF       45,205 5,101,384
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF       38,934 4,459,890
          40,154,931
Stock funds:  9.01%          
Wells Fargo Diversified Income Builder Fund Class R6       1,650,605 10,365,802
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6       138,437 4,921,422
Wells Fargo Endeavor Select Fund Class R6 ♠†       461,667 5,886,257
Wells Fargo Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 ♠†       109,111 5,882,177
          27,055,658
Total Investment companies (Cost $241,893,309)         293,343,587
    
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  37


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021
Spectrum Growth Fund

    Yield   Shares Value
Short-term investments:  0.32%          
Investment companies:  0.32%          
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class ♠∞   0.03%     966,950 $     966,950
Total Short-term investments (Cost $966,950)             966,950
Total investments in securities (Cost $242,860,259) 98.01%       294,310,537
Other assets and liabilities, net 1.99         5,972,393
Total net assets 100.00%       $300,282,930
    
Non-income-earning security
The issuer is an affiliate of the Fund as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The rate represents the 7-day annualized yield at period end.
Investments in affiliates
An affiliated investment is an investment in which the Fund owns at least 5% of the outstanding voting shares of the issuer or as a result of other relationships, such as the Fund and the issuer having the same investment manager. Transactions with issuers that were either affiliates of the Fund at the beginning of the period or the end of the period were as follows:
  Value,
beginning of
period
Purchases Sales
proceeds
Net
realized
gains
(losses) on
affiliated
Underlying
Funds
  Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses) on
affiliated
Underlying
Funds
  Value,
end of
period
  % of
net
assets
Investment companies                    
Alternative investment funds                    
Wells Fargo Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class R6 $9,261,772 $ 991,428 $ (6,350,449) $(1,467,337)   $ 1,424,495   $ 3,859,909   1.29%
Bond funds                    
Wells Fargo Global Investment Grade Credit Fund Class R6 2,706,836 5,693,985 (62,099) (720)   (129,915)   8,208,087    
Wells Fargo High Yield Bond Fund Institutional Class 742,599 12,059,399 (1,376,065) (4,214)   291,968   11,713,687    
Wells Fargo Income Plus Fund Institutional Class 6,675,119 10,679,756 (2,855,119) 3,283   981,298   15,484,337    
                35,406,111   11.79
Stock funds                    
Wells Fargo Diversified Income Builder Fund Class R6 0 9,799,057 (171,426) 177   737,994   10,365,802    
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6 3,706,105 2,181,855 (2,225,814) 612,696   646,580   4,921,422    
Wells Fargo Endeavor Select Fund Class R6 8,508,998 660,830 (4,823,678) 831,991   708,116   5,886,257    
Wells Fargo Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 8,550,041 1,023,269 (4,882,673) 353,695   837,845   5,882,177    
                27,055,658   9.01
Short-term investments                    
Investment companies                    
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class 768,588 72,110,797 (71,912,435) 0   0   966,950   0.32
        $ 329,571   $5,498,381   $67,288,628   22.41%
    
Non-income-earning security
    
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

38  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021
Spectrum Growth Fund

  Shares,
end of
period
Dividends from
affiliated
Underlying Funds
  Net realized gains
on capital gain
distributions
from affiliated
Underlying Funds
Investment companies        
Alternative investment funds        
Wells Fargo Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class R6 454,642 $ 0   $ 0
Bond funds        
Wells Fargo Global Investment Grade Credit Fund Class R6 772,890 167,537   182,494
Wells Fargo High Yield Bond Fund Institutional Class 3,455,365 251,210   0
Wells Fargo Income Plus Fund Institutional Class 1,527,055 456,761   0
Stock funds        
Wells Fargo Diversified Income Builder Fund Class R6 1,650,605 235,750   0
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6 138,437 12,039   0
Wells Fargo Endeavor Select Fund Class R6 461,667 0   384,229
Wells Fargo Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 109,111 0   686,272
Short-term investments        
Investment companies        
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class 966,950 566   0
    $1,123,863   $1,252,995
    
Non-income-earning security
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  39


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021
Spectrum Growth Fund

Transactions with the affiliated Master Portfolios were as follows:
  % of
ownership,
beginning
of period
% of
ownership,
end of
period
Net realized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Interest
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Dividends
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Affiliated
income
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Value,
end of
period
  % of
net
assets
Wells Fargo Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate ex-Corporate Portfolio 1.61% 1.10% $ 117,009   $ (367,685)   $ 113,807   $ 0   $ 312   $ 6,409,459    
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio 0.20 0.04 434,511   (387,624)   126,763   0   294   2,040,171    
Wells Fargo Disciplined Large Cap Portfolio 18.85 16.86 4,525,614   14,383,992   0   952,081   4,231   55,539,023    
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio 0.93 0.32 1,938,018   (313,183)   0   4,507   1,112   3,064,981    
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio 5.04 2.47 736,234   2,386,909   0   222,322   99   4,466,073    
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio 4.71 4.97 3,060,872   6,680,622   0   908,781   342   35,375,313    
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Equity Portfolio 4.65 2.16 5,377,098   2,343,039   0   444,008   405   17,676,401    
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio 4.06 2.67 1,852,507   3,411,349   0   81,984   117   5,701,747    
Wells Fargo High Yield Corporate Bond Portfolio 0.44 5.23 109,038   23,734   100,087   0   10   2,625,931    
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio 1.35 7.80 226,531   488,982   284,516   39,844   113   18,660,387    
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio 0.92 0.53 289,566   966,024   0   41,621   301   3,288,716    
Wells Fargo Strategic Retirement Bond Portfolio 0.00 12.15 224,945   (107,730)   162,904   0   24   18,641,791    
      $18,891,943   $29,508,429   $788,077   $2,695,148   $7,360   $173,489,993   57.78%
Futures contracts
Description Number of
contracts
Expiration
date
Notional
cost
Notional
value
Unrealized
gains
  Unrealized
losses
Long              
Bloomberg Commodity Index 393 6-16-2021 $ 3,589,241 $ 3,643,110 $ 53,869   $ 0
E-Mini S&P 500 Index 49 6-18-2021 9,709,890 10,295,880 585,990   0
FTSE 100 Index 45 6-18-2021 4,482,578 4,490,231 7,653   0
IBEX 35 Index 126 6-18-2021 14,045,736 14,074,198 28,462   0
MSCI Emerging Markets Index 45 6-18-2021 3,003,195 3,062,025 58,830   0
Short              
Australian Dollars Futures (116) 6-14-2021 (8,961,436) (8,948,240) 13,196   0
Mini-DAX Futures (146) 6-18-2021 (12,982,019) (13,759,774) 0   (777,755)
          $748,000   $(777,755)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

40  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021
Spectrum Income Allocation Fund

        Shares Value
Investment companies:  97.40%          
Affiliated master portfolios:  70.03%          
Wells Fargo Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate ex-Corporate Portfolio                 $  48,878,223
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio                  72,133,853
Wells Fargo Disciplined Large Cap Portfolio                   8,453,869
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio                     627,103
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio                     434,745
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio                   2,843,984
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced U. S. Large Cap Equity Portfolio                   1,193,855
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio                     651,758
Wells Fargo High Yield Corporate Bond Portfolio                   1,941,468
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio                   8,621,456
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio                     625,411
Wells Fargo Strategic Retirement Bond Portfolio                   8,606,340
          155,012,065
Alternative investment funds:  5.87%          
PIMCO CommodityRealReturn Strategy Fund Institutional Class       1,311,240   9,519,605
Wells Fargo Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class R6 ♠†         408,206   3,465,667
           12,985,272
Bond funds:  12.78%          
Wells Fargo Global Investment Grade Credit Fund Class R6         591,525   6,281,998
Wells Fargo High Yield Bond Fund Institutional Class       1,273,146   4,315,963
Wells Fargo Income Plus Fund Institutional Class       1,745,580  17,700,186
           28,298,147
Exchange-traded funds:  5.00%          
Aberdeen Standard Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF       33,392 862,849
Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund       40,321 2,105,160
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF       19,861 1,525,325
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF       3,284 218,879
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF       6,838 2,883,243
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF       2,312 260,909
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF       27,994 3,206,713
          11,063,078
Stock funds:  3.72%          
Wells Fargo Diversified Income Builder Fund Class R6       864,331 5,427,996
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6       18,372 653,110
Wells Fargo Endeavor Select Fund Class R6 ♠†       84,773 1,080,857
Wells Fargo Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 ♠†       20,078 1,082,406
          8,244,369
Total Investment companies (Cost $204,722,948)         215,602,931
    
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  41


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021
Spectrum Income Allocation Fund

    Yield   Shares Value
Short-term investments:  0.50%          
Investment companies:  0.50%          
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class ♠∞   0.03%   1,100,000 $  1,100,000
Total Short-term investments (Cost $1,100,000)           1,100,000
Total investments in securities (Cost $205,822,948) 97.90%       216,702,931
Other assets and liabilities, net 2.10         4,640,877
Total net assets 100.00%       $221,343,808
    
Non-income-earning security
The issuer is an affiliate of the Fund as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The rate represents the 7-day annualized yield at period end.
Investments in affiliates
An affiliated investment is an investment in which the Fund owns at least 5% of the outstanding voting shares of the issuer or as a result of other relationships, such as the Fund and the issuer having the same investment manager. Transactions with issuers that were either affiliates of the Fund at the beginning of the period or the end of the period were as follows:
  Value,
beginning of
period
Purchases Sales
proceeds
Net
realized
gains
(losses) on
affiliated
Underlying
Funds
  Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses) on
affiliated
Underlying
Funds
  Value,
end of
period
  % of
net
assets
Investment companies                    
Alternative investment funds                    
Wells Fargo Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class R6 $ 8,895,359 $ 191,001 $ (5,586,102) $(1,289,628)   $ 1,255,037   $ 3,465,667   1.57%
Bond funds                    
Wells Fargo Global Investment Grade Credit Fund Class R6 12,824,937 582,504 (7,356,987) 226,838   4,706   6,281,998    
Wells Fargo High Yield Bond Fund Institutional Class 3,469,313 1,547,948 (945,098) (11,584)   255,384   4,315,963    
Wells Fargo Income Plus Fund Institutional Class 31,161,289 2,095,205 (17,480,688) 558,912   1,365,468   17,700,186    
                28,298,147   12.78
Stock funds                    
Wells Fargo Diversified Income Builder Fund Class R6 0 5,933,469 (935,843) 41,421   388,949   5,427,996    
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6 855,847 243,266 (702,070) 246,429   9,638   653,110    
Wells Fargo Endeavor Select Fund Class R6 1,939,111 120,739 (1,318,073) 224,749   114,331   1,080,857    
Wells Fargo Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 1,940,462 187,431 (1,314,103) 135,251   133,365   1,082,406    
                8,244,369   3.72
Short-term investments                    
Investment companies                    
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class 976,721 30,319,288 (30,196,009) 0   0   1,100,000   0.50
        $ 132,388   $3,526,878   $41,108,183   18.57%
    
Non-income-earning security
    
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

42  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021
Spectrum Income Allocation Fund

  Shares,
end of
period
Dividends from
affiliated
Underlying Funds
  Net realized gains
on capital gain
distributions
from affiliated
Underlying Funds
Investment companies        
Alternative investment funds        
Wells Fargo Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class R6 408,206 $ 0   $ 0
Bond funds        
Wells Fargo Global Investment Grade Credit Fund Class R6 591,525 276,344   152,114
Wells Fargo High Yield Bond Fund Institutional Class 1,273,146 153,199   0
Wells Fargo Income Plus Fund Institutional Class 1,745,580 1,003,079   0
Stock funds        
Wells Fargo Diversified Income Builder Fund Class R6 864,331 130,884   0
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6 18,372 1,928   0
Wells Fargo Endeavor Select Fund Class R6 84,773 0   77,484
Wells Fargo Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 20,078 0   139,721
Short-term investments        
Investment companies        
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class 1,100,000 578   0
    $1,566,012   $369,319
    
Non-income-earning security
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  43


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021
Spectrum Income Allocation Fund

Transactions with the affiliated Master Portfolios were as follows:
  % of
ownership,
beginning
of period
% of
ownership,
end of
period
Net realized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Interest
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Dividends
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Affiliated
income
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Value,
end of
period
  % of
net
assets
Wells Fargo Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate ex-Corporate Portfolio 7.52% 8.37% $ 443,539   $(1,833,814)   $ 666,818   $ 0   $ 1,894   $ 48,878,223    
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio 0.94 1.28 1,244,428   (1,620,477)   1,087,935   0   2,206   72,133,853    
Wells Fargo Disciplined Large Cap Portfolio 4.29 2.57 803,074   2,321,783   0   158,777   764   8,453,869    
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio 0.21 0.07 546,220   (141,435)   0   996   255   627,103    
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio 1.17 0.24 2,771   (334,647)   0   47,430   21   434,745    
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio 1.07 0.40 479,669   535,004   0   111,857   71   2,843,984    
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced U. S. Large Cap Equity Portfolio 1.06 0.15 1,012,379   (242,175)   0   65,316   80   1,193,855    
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio 0.91 0.31 333,388   414,411   0   12,511   23   651,758    
Wells Fargo High Yield Corporate Bond Portfolio 2.03 3.87 58,929   149,442   151,344   0   27   1,941,468    
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio 6.31 3.60 96,654   596,721   239,869   29,241   134   8,621,456    
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio 0.21 0.10 98,959   234,515   0   9,509   70   625,411    
Wells Fargo Strategic Retirement Bond Portfolio 0.00 5.61 45,757   23,213   74,281   0   44   8,606,340    
      $5,165,767   $ 102,541   $2,220,247   $435,637   $5,589   $155,012,065   70.03%
Futures contracts
Description Number of
contracts
Expiration
date
Notional
cost
Notional
value
Unrealized
gains
  Unrealized
losses
Long              
Bloomberg Commodity Index 291 6-16-2021 $ 2,657,683 $ 2,697,570 $ 39,887   $ 0
E-Mini S&P 500 Index 30 6-18-2021 5,946,349 6,303,600 357,251   0
FTSE 100 Index 33 6-18-2021 3,287,224 3,292,836 5,612   0
IBEX 35 Index 104 6-18-2021 11,593,468 11,616,798 23,330   0
MSCI Emerging Markets Index 34 6-18-2021 2,269,080 2,313,530 44,450   0
Short              
Australian Dollars Futures (86) 6-14-2021 (6,643,823) (6,634,040) 9,783   0
Mini-DAX Futures (121) 6-18-2021 (10,758,917) (11,403,648) 0   (644,731)
10-Year U.S. Treasury Notes (59) 9-21-2021 (7,761,129) (7,784,313) 0   (23,184)
          $480,313   $(667,915)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

44  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021
Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund

        Shares Value
Investment companies:  97.58%          
Affiliated master portfolios:  61.84%          
Wells Fargo Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate ex-Corporate Portfolio                 $  42,320,605
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio                  35,280,296
Wells Fargo Disciplined Large Cap Portfolio                  90,812,534
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio                   4,976,524
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio                   6,722,631
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio                  52,784,249
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Equity Portfolio                  24,755,192
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio                   8,449,994
Wells Fargo High Yield Corporate Bond Portfolio                   4,893,538
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio                  34,769,502
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio                   5,337,008
Wells Fargo Strategic Retirement Bond Portfolio                  34,740,578
          345,842,651
Alternative investment funds:  6.51%          
PIMCO CommodityRealReturn Strategy Fund Institutional Class       3,479,674  25,262,437
Wells Fargo Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class R6 ♠†       1,312,864  11,146,214
           36,408,651
Bond funds:  12.10%          
Wells Fargo Global Investment Grade Credit Fund Class R6       1,453,755  15,438,876
Wells Fargo High Yield Bond Fund Institutional Class       4,019,846  13,627,279
Wells Fargo Income Plus Fund Institutional Class       3,809,289  38,626,187
           67,692,342
Exchange-traded funds:  9.88%          
Aberdeen Standard Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF       88,522 2,287,408
Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund       101,515 5,300,098
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF       66,173 5,082,086
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF       78,530 5,234,025
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF       54,033 22,783,014
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF       54,792 6,183,277
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF       73,403 8,408,314
          55,278,222
Stock funds:  7.25%          
Wells Fargo Diversified Income Builder Fund Class R6       2,649,031 16,635,917
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6       206,864 7,354,031
Wells Fargo Endeavor Select Fund Class R6 ♠†       649,380 8,279,598
Wells Fargo Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 ♠†       153,555 8,278,161
          40,547,707
Total Investment companies (Cost $469,531,941)         545,769,573
    
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  45


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021
Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund

    Yield   Shares Value
Short-term investments:  0.48%          
Investment companies:  0.48%          
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class ♠∞   0.03%   2,652,130 $  2,652,130
Total Short-term investments (Cost $2,652,130)           2,652,130
Total investments in securities (Cost $472,184,071) 98.06%       548,421,703
Other assets and liabilities, net 1.94        10,859,912
Total net assets 100.00%       $559,281,615
    
Non-income-earning security
The issuer is an affiliate of the Fund as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The rate represents the 7-day annualized yield at period end.
Investments in affiliates
An affiliated investment is an investment in which the Fund owns at least 5% of the outstanding voting shares of the issuer or as a result of other relationships, such as the Fund and the issuer having the same investment manager. Transactions with issuers that were either affiliates of the Fund at the beginning of the period or the end of the period were as follows:
  Value,
beginning of
period
Purchases Sales
proceeds
Net
realized
gains
(losses) on
affiliated
Underlying
Funds
  Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses) on
affiliated
Underlying
Funds
  Value,
end of
period
  % of
net
assets
Investment companies                    
Alternative investment funds                    
Wells Fargo Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class R6 $18,667,657 $ 937,633 $ (8,601,643) $(2,003,603)   $ 2,146,170   $ 11,146,214   1.99%
Bond funds                    
Wells Fargo Global Investment Grade Credit Fund Class R6 12,739,817 2,971,406 (261,238) (2,584)   (8,525)   15,438,876    
Wells Fargo High Yield Bond Fund Institutional Class 3,490,191 11,207,786 (1,517,403) (11,338)   458,043   13,627,279    
Wells Fargo Income Plus Fund Institutional Class 31,365,106 10,551,017 (6,228,088) 26,578   2,911,574   38,626,187    
                67,692,342   12.10
Stock funds                    
Wells Fargo Diversified Income Builder Fund Class R6 0 16,080,514 (653,764) 17,365   1,191,802   16,635,917    
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6 5,608,025 3,113,411 (3,273,643) 929,622   976,616   7,354,031    
Wells Fargo Endeavor Select Fund Class R6 12,750,258 725,892 (7,449,482) 1,247,132   1,005,798   8,279,598    
Wells Fargo Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 12,787,291 1,194,950 (7,455,185) 5,110,811   (3,359,706)   8,278,161    
                40,547,707   7.25
Short-term investments                    
Investment companies                    
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class 2,350,179 100,717,474 (100,415,523) 0   0   2,652,130   0.48
        $ 5,313,983   $ 5,321,772   $122,038,393   21.82%
    
Non-income-earning security
    
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

46  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021
Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund

  Shares,
end of
period
Dividends from
affiliated
Underlying Funds
  Net realized gains
on capital gain
distributions
from affiliated
Underlying Funds
Investment companies        
Alternative investment funds        
Wells Fargo Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class R6 1,312,864 $ 0   $ 0
Bond funds        
Wells Fargo Global Investment Grade Credit Fund Class R6 1,453,755 421,494   346,121
Wells Fargo High Yield Bond Fund Institutional Class 4,019,846 342,515   0
Wells Fargo Income Plus Fund Institutional Class 3,809,289 1,442,077   0
Stock funds        
Wells Fargo Diversified Income Builder Fund Class R6 2,649,031 383,027   0
Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6 206,864 18,339   0
Wells Fargo Endeavor Select Fund Class R6 649,380 0   549,482
Wells Fargo Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 153,555 0   983,033
Short-term investments        
Investment companies        
Wells Fargo Government Money Market Fund Select Class 2,652,130 1,400   0
    $2,608,852   $1,878,636
    
Non-income-earning security
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  47


Portfolio of investments—May 31, 2021
Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund

Transactions with the affiliated Master Portfolios were as follows:
  % of
ownership,
beginning
of period
% of
ownership,
end of
period
Net realized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Net
change in
unrealized
gains
(losses) on
securities
transactions
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Interest
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Dividends
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Affiliated
income
allocated
from
affiliated
Master
Portfolios
  Value,
end of
period
  % of
net
assets
Wells Fargo Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate ex-Corporate Portfolio 7.53% 7.25% $ 574,420   $ (2,033,981)   $ 614,598   $ 0   $ 1,620   $ 42,320,605    
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio 0.94 0.63 1,825,226   (1,980,160)   737,948   0   1,594   35,280,296    
Wells Fargo Disciplined Large Cap Portfolio 28.30 27.57 7,024,738   23,539,663   0   1,491,949   6,553   90,812,534    
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio 1.38 0.52 3,125,198   (576,037)   0   7,085   1,733   4,976,524    
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio 7.64 3.71 1,177,932   3,467,712   0   329,247   147   6,722,631    
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio 7.08 7.41 4,865,496   9,938,653   0   1,350,876   507   52,784,249    
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Equity Portfolio 7.00 3.02 8,213,302   2,770,236   0   638,858   593   24,755,192    
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio 6.09 3.96 2,832,708   4,908,083   0   120,900   171   8,449,994    
Wells Fargo High Yield Corporate Bond Portfolio 2.06 9.76 144,258   174,925   243,162   0   27   4,893,538    
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio 6.33 14.53 347,246   1,230,617   662,683   82,160   245   34,769,502    
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio 1.39 0.86 512,084   1,658,507   0   66,609   462   5,337,008    
Wells Fargo Strategic Retirement Bond Portfolio 0.00 22.64 317,597   (62,710)   305,993   0   46   34,740,578    
      $30,960,205   $43,035,508   $2,564,384   $4,087,684   $13,698   $345,842,651   61.84%
Futures contracts
Description Number of
contracts
Expiration
date
Notional
cost
Notional
value
Unrealized
gains
  Unrealized
losses
Long              
Bloomberg Commodity Index 733 6-16-2021 $ 6,694,438 $ 6,794,910 $ 100,472   $ 0
E-Mini S&P 500 Index 96 6-18-2021 19,022,032 20,171,520 1,149,488   0
FTSE 100 Index 84 6-18-2021 8,367,479 8,381,765 14,286   0
IBEX 35 Index 240 6-18-2021 26,753,952 26,807,996 54,044   0
MSCI Emerging Markets Index 84 6-18-2021 5,605,963 5,715,780 109,817   0
Short              
Australian Dollars Futures (217) 6-14-2021 (16,764,066) (16,739,380) 24,686   0
Mini-DAX Index (278) 6-18-2021 (24,719,186) (26,200,117) 0   (1,480,931)
          $1,452,793   $(1,480,931)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

48  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Statements of assets and liabilities—May 31, 2021
  Spectrum
Aggressive
Growth Fund
Spectrum
Conservative
Growth Fund
Assets    
Investments in affiliated Master Portfolios, at value (see cost below)

$ 306,036,403 $ 235,508,593
Investments in unaffiliated Underlying Funds, at value (see cost below)

88,446,916 48,664,120
Investments in affiliated Underlying Funds, at value (see cost below)

51,368,427 88,497,588
Cash at broker segregated for futures contracts

8,161,457 8,259,808
Receivable for Fund shares sold

156,438 94,004
Receivable for investments sold

61,157 27,975
Receivable for dividends

0 27,032
Prepaid expenses and other assets

47,386 106,267
Total assets

454,278,184 381,185,387
Liabilities    
Payable for Fund shares redeemed

560,839 540,266
Distribution fee payable

239,728 215,016
Shareholder servicing fees payable

94,027 80,241
Management fee payable

92,300 71,865
Administration fees payable

79,823 67,727
Overdraft due to custodian bank

60,997 24,978
Payable for daily variation margin on open futures contracts

1,377 4,874
Payable for investments purchased

0 36,522
Accrued expenses and other liabilities

6,786 10,773
Total liabilities

1,135,877 1,052,262
Total net assets

$453,142,307 $380,133,125
Net assets consist of    
Paid-in capital

$ 310,740,154 $ 321,556,328
Total distributable earnings

142,402,153 58,576,797
Total net assets

$453,142,307 $380,133,125
Computation of net asset value and offering price per share    
Net assets – Class A

$ 66,239,172 $ 40,353,745
Shares outstanding – Class A1

2,902,998 3,440,505
Net asset value per share – Class A

$22.82 $11.73
Maximum offering price per share – Class A2

$24.21 $12.45
Net assets – Class C

$ 378,940,737 $ 336,665,368
Shares outstanding – Class C1

16,743,138 28,102,087
Net asset value per share – Class C

$22.63 $11.98
Net assets – Institutional Class

$ 7,962,398 $ 3,114,012
Shares outstanding – Institutional Class1

348,106 264,672
Net asset value per share – Institutional Class

$22.87 $11.77
Investments in affiliated Master Portfolios, at cost

$ 227,619,214 $ 212,456,447
Investments in unaffiliated Underlying Funds and securities, at cost

$ 74,207,753 $ 40,179,172
Investments in affiliated Underlying Funds, at cost

$ 39,604,303 $ 82,958,840
1 Each Fund has an unlimited number of authorized shares.
2 Maximum offering price is computed as 100/94.25 of net asset value. On investments of $50,000 or more, the offering price is reduced.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  49


Statements of assets and liabilities—May 31, 2021
  Spectrum
Growth Fund
Spectrum
Income
Allocation Fund
Spectrum
Moderate
Growth Fund
Assets      
Investments in affiliated Master Portfolios, at value (see cost below)

$ 173,489,993 $ 155,012,065 $ 345,842,651
Investments in unaffiliated Underlying Funds, at value (see cost below)

53,531,916 20,582,683 80,540,659
Investments in affiliated Underlying Funds, at value (see cost below)

67,288,628 41,108,183 122,038,393
Cash

55,395 0 9,310
Cash at broker segregated for futures contracts

6,373,862 4,940,887 12,033,735
Receivable for Fund shares sold

51,880 3,160 89,280
Receivable for investments sold

22,511 43,993 19,195
Receivable for dividends

28,283 10,469 32,915
Prepaid expenses and other assets

70,873 50,313 8,477
Total assets

300,913,341 221,751,753 560,614,615
Liabilities      
Payable for Fund shares redeemed

204,741 85,100 570,036
Distribution fee payable

168,943 124,826 317,901
Shareholder servicing fees payable

0 46,828 0
Management fee payable

53,109 35,694 118,615
Administration fees payable

53,281 39,475 99,408
Overdraft due to custodian bank

0 44,012 0
Payable for daily variation margin on open futures contracts

22 15,142 1,651
Payable for investments purchased

112,991 12,984 69,338
Accrued expenses and other liabilities

37,324 3,884 156,051
Total liabilities

630,411 407,945 1,333,000
Total net assets

$300,282,930 $221,343,808 $559,281,615
Net assets consist of      
Paid-in capital

$ 228,968,849 $ 204,479,442 $ 447,760,003
Total distributable earnings

71,314,081 16,864,366 111,521,612
Total net assets

$300,282,930 $221,343,808 $559,281,615
Computation of net asset value and offering price per share      
Net assets – Class A

$ 31,295,218 $ 24,169,790 $ 56,003,521
Shares outstanding – Class A1

2,164,862 2,301,385 4,023,062
Net asset value per share – Class A

$14.46 $10.50 $13.92
Maximum offering price per share – Class A2

$15.34 $11.14 $14.77
Net assets – Class C

$ 266,398,684 $ 196,034,868 $ 499,835,166
Shares outstanding – Class C1

18,022,577 18,736,455 35,147,875
Net asset value per share – Class C

$14.78 $10.46 $14.22
Net assets – Institutional Class

$ 2,589,028 $ 1,139,150 $ 3,442,928
Shares outstanding – Institutional Class1

179,080 108,523 247,142
Net asset value per share – Institutional Class

$14.46 $10.50 $13.93
Investments in affiliated Master Portfolios, at cost

$ 136,143,036 $ 149,585,428 $ 290,511,594
Investments in unaffiliated Underlying Funds and securities, at cost

$ 44,770,989 $ 17,483,955 $ 68,338,661
Investments in affiliated Underlying Funds, at cost

$ 61,946,234 $ 38,753,565 $ 113,333,816
1 Each Fund has an unlimited number of authorized shares.
2 Maximum offering price is computed as 100/94.25 of net asset value. On investments of $50,000 or more, the offering price is reduced.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

50  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Statements of operations—year ended May 31, 2021
  Spectrum
Aggressive
Growth Fund
Spectrum
Conservative
Growth Fund
Investment income    
Dividends allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios*

$ 5,582,555 $ 1,805,959
Dividends from unaffiliated Underlying Funds

848,898 623,045
Dividends from affiliated Underlying Funds

35,874 2,445,470
Affiliated income allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

14,173 8,640
Interest allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios**

0 2,639,177
Expenses allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

(798,524) (642,692)
Waivers allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

120,191 71,369
Total investment income

5,803,167 6,950,968
Expenses    
Management fee

1,039,952 960,063
Administration fees    
Class A

117,449 77,460
Class C

746,019 722,999
Institutional Class

6,247 3,710
Shareholder servicing fees    
Class A

139,731 92,187
Class C

887,306 860,114
Distribution fee    
Class C

2,656,993 2,579,276
Custody and accounting fees

41,582 57,002
Professional fees

36,996 39,534
Registration fees

53,904 58,658
Shareholder report expenses

49,469 51,988
Trustees’ fees and expenses

21,065 21,065
Other fees and expenses

83,558 12,679
Total expenses

5,880,271 5,536,735
Less: Fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements    
Fund-level

(41,981) (85,376)
Class A

(14) (36)
Class C

(296) (77)
Net expenses

5,837,980 5,451,246
Net investment income (loss)

(34,813) 1,499,722
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments    
Net realized gains (losses) on    
Securities transactions allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

38,697,746 15,645,781
Affiliated Underlying Funds

770,231 228,196
Unaffiliated Underlying Funds

10,345,474 5,395,157
Futures contracts

(929,845) 6,344,194
Capital gain distributions from affiliated Underlying Funds

3,110,187 973,797
Net realized gains on investments

51,993,793 28,587,125
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on    
Securities transactions allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

65,587,740 15,571,889
Affiliated Underlying Funds

7,489,058 7,121,212
Unaffiliated Underlying Funds

8,281,815 5,743,428
Futures contracts

(927,800) (4,042,139)
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

80,430,813 24,394,390
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

132,424,606 52,981,515
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

$132,389,793 $54,481,237
 *Net of foreign dividend withholding taxes allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios in the amount of

$277,605 $82,297
 **Net of foreign interest withholding taxes allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios in the amount of

49 0
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  51


Statements of operations—year ended May 31, 2021
  Spectrum
Growth Fund
Spectrum
Income
Allocation Fund
Spectrum
Moderate
Growth Fund
Investment income      
Dividends allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios*

$ 2,695,148 $ 435,637 $ 4,087,684
Dividends from unaffiliated Underlying Funds

563,050 325,551 929,094
Dividends from affiliated Underlying Funds

1,123,863 1,566,012 2,608,852
Affiliated income allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

7,360 5,589 13,698
Interest allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

788,077 2,220,247 2,564,384
Expenses allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

(495,080) (397,941) (944,750)
Waivers allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

75,174 30,687 125,887
Total investment income

4,757,592 4,185,782 9,384,849
Expenses      
Management fee

722,489 581,425 1,372,928
Administration fees      
Class A

60,493 49,941 109,431
Class C

541,965 436,835 1,039,452
Institutional Class

2,744 1,004 2,710
Shareholder servicing fees      
Class A

71,991 59,453 130,211
Class C

644,614 519,959 1,236,532
Distribution fee      
Class C

1,931,033 1,558,512 3,707,673
Custody and accounting fees

48,690 47,426 55,194
Professional fees

37,433 37,651 37,308
Registration fees

57,999 53,597 48,730
Shareholder report expenses

49,881 44,154 48,494
Trustees’ fees and expenses

21,065 21,065 21,065
Other fees and expenses

11,769 12,500 13,719
Total expenses

4,202,166 3,423,522 7,823,447
Less: Fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements      
Fund-level

(107,224) (122,022) (8,650)
Class A

(164) (168) (25)
Class C

(195) (68) (132)
Institutional Class

0 (71) 0
Net expenses

4,094,583 3,301,193 7,814,640
Net investment income

663,009 884,589 1,570,209
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments      
Net realized gains on      
Securities transactions allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

18,891,943 5,165,767 30,960,205
Affiliated Underlying Funds

329,571 132,388 5,313,983
Unaffiliated Underlying Funds

6,328,064 2,661,889 10,818,947
Futures contracts

2,714,308 4,098,270 6,268,859
Capital gain distributions from affiliated Underlying Funds

1,252,995 369,319 1,878,636
Net realized gains on investments

29,516,881 12,427,633 55,240,630
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on      
Securities transactions allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios

29,508,429 102,541 43,035,508
Affiliated Underlying Funds

5,498,381 3,526,878 5,321,772
Unaffiliated Underlying Funds

5,662,953 1,876,820 7,182,368
Futures contracts

(2,199,392) (2,177,052) (4,124,674)
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

38,470,371 3,329,187 51,414,974
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

67,987,252 15,756,820 106,655,604
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

$68,650,261 $16,641,409 $108,225,813
 *Net of foreign dividend withholding taxes allocated from affiliated Master Portfolios in the amount of

$128,915 $18,516 $191,588
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

52  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Statements of changes in net assets
  Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund
  Year ended
May 31, 2021
Year ended
May 31, 2020
Operations        
Net investment income (loss)

  $ (34,813)   $ 1,639,003
Net realized gains on investments

  51,993,793   24,590,770
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

  80,430,813   21,688,508
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

  132,389,793   47,918,281
Distributions to shareholders from        
Net investment income and net realized gains        
Class A

  (6,623,108)   (567,930)
Class C

  (39,111,345)   (1,552,546)
Institutional Class

  (694,018)   (29,699)
Total distributions to shareholders

  (46,428,471)   (2,150,175)
Capital share transactions Shares   Shares  
Proceeds from shares sold        
Class A

623,597 13,041,652 298,353 5,199,857
Class C

389,900 8,091,779 359,085 6,260,353
Institutional Class

391,169 8,403,353 160,349 2,796,790
    29,536,784   14,257,000
Reinvestment of distributions        
Class A

328,529 6,609,807 30,298 567,646
Class C

1,965,541 39,056,091 83,857 1,551,446
Institutional Class

34,207 690,909 1,565 29,353
    46,356,807   2,148,445
Payment for shares redeemed        
Class A

(455,030) (9,574,877) (500,951) (8,818,583)
Class C

(3,163,474) (65,689,559) (4,600,956) (80,224,929)
Institutional Class

(199,811) (4,221,401) (110,171) (1,953,391)
    (79,485,837)   (90,996,903)
Net decrease in net assets resulting from capital share transactions

  (3,592,246)   (74,591,458)
Total increase (decrease) in net assets

  82,369,076   (28,823,352)
Net assets        
Beginning of period

  370,773,231   399,596,583
End of period

  $453,142,307   $370,773,231
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  53


Statements of changes in net assets
  Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund
  Year ended
May 31, 2021
Year ended
May 31, 2020
Operations        
Net investment income

  $ 1,499,722   $ 3,179,134
Net realized gains on investments

  28,587,125   15,599,553
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

  24,394,390   13,024,227
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

  54,481,237   31,802,914
Distributions to shareholders from        
Net investment income and net realized gains        
Class A

  (2,874,479)   (890,327)
Class C

  (23,065,495)   (7,430,688)
Institutional Class

  (232,146)   (71,252)
Total distributions to shareholders

  (26,172,120)   (8,392,267)
Capital share transactions Shares   Shares  
Proceeds from shares sold        
Class A

899,699 10,314,561 495,127 5,210,475
Class C

651,887 7,621,225 635,339 6,853,024
Institutional Class

392,489 4,509,854 478,608 5,104,224
    22,445,640   17,167,723
Reinvestment of distributions        
Class A

256,759 2,862,770 83,080 889,538
Class C

2,023,499 23,054,380 677,973 7,425,458
Institutional Class

20,581 230,089 6,589 70,517
    26,147,239   8,385,513
Payment for shares redeemed        
Class A

(642,548) (7,354,896) (963,431) (10,195,020)
Class C

(5,048,642) (59,028,155) (8,292,697) (89,328,473)
Institutional Class

(393,186) (4,510,389) (416,582) (4,444,469)
    (70,893,440)   (103,967,962)
Net decrease in net assets resulting from capital share transactions

  (22,300,561)   (78,414,726)
Total increase (decrease) in net assets

  6,008,556   (55,004,079)
Net assets        
Beginning of period

  374,124,569   429,128,648
End of period

  $380,133,125   $ 374,124,569
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

54  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Statements of changes in net assets
  Spectrum Growth Fund
  Year ended
May 31, 2021
Year ended
May 31, 2020
Operations        
Net investment income

  $ 663,009   $ 1,302,605
Net realized gains on investments

  29,516,881   13,023,850
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

  38,470,371   13,881,246
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

  68,650,261   28,207,701
Distributions to shareholders from        
Net investment income and net realized gains        
Class A

  (3,243,409)   (354,829)
Class C

  (26,381,409)   (1,568,479)
Institutional Class

  (222,924)   (19,520)
Total distributions to shareholders

  (29,847,742)   (1,942,828)
Capital share transactions Shares   Shares  
Proceeds from shares sold        
Class A

272,532 3,728,807 328,720 4,010,239
Class C

596,433 8,374,465 732,564 9,057,872
Institutional Class

384,979 5,297,306 255,491 3,119,078
    17,400,578   16,187,189
Reinvestment of distributions        
Class A

244,354 3,224,483 27,608 352,213
Class C

1,960,878 26,340,207 120,114 1,566,754
Institutional Class

16,651 220,017 1,501 19,123
    29,784,707   1,938,090
Payment for shares redeemed        
Class A

(327,346) (4,519,304) (405,547) (4,933,473)
Class C

(3,206,938) (45,083,560) (4,402,354) (54,313,865)
Institutional Class

(302,532) (4,187,189) (237,408) (2,898,904)
    (53,790,053)   (62,146,242)
Net decrease in net assets resulting from capital share transactions

  (6,604,768)   (44,020,963)
Total increase (decrease) in net assets

  32,197,751   (17,756,090)
Net assets        
Beginning of period

  268,085,179   285,841,269
End of period

  $300,282,930   $268,085,179
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  55


Statements of changes in net assets
  Spectrum Income Allocation Fund
  Year ended
May 31, 2021
Year ended
May 31, 2020
Operations        
Net investment income

  $ 884,589   $ 2,265,590
Net realized gains on investments

  12,427,633   7,022,927
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

  3,329,187   7,306,614
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

  16,641,409   16,595,131
Distributions to shareholders from        
Net investment income and net realized gains        
Class A

  (1,654,082)   (296,807)
Class C

  (12,372,666)   (2,755,368)
Institutional Class

  (45,632)   (12,973)
Total distributions to shareholders

  (14,072,380)   (3,065,148)
Capital share transactions Shares   Shares  
Proceeds from shares sold        
Class A

655,046 6,974,259 784,255 7,929,477
Class C

388,820 4,117,662 1,484,720 14,624,150
Institutional Class

158,340 1,658,872 154,637 1,542,234
    12,750,793   24,095,861
Reinvestment of distributions        
Class A

158,621 1,651,355 29,412 296,366
Class C

1,194,142 12,367,736 271,115 2,729,197
Institutional Class

4,206 43,767 1,242 12,499
    14,062,858   3,038,062
Payment for shares redeemed        
Class A

(555,818) (5,851,268) (424,008) (4,271,019)
Class C

(3,353,220) (35,330,536) (5,428,685) (54,474,256)
Institutional Class

(122,318) (1,287,654) (131,864) (1,316,978)
    (42,469,458)   (60,062,253)
Net decrease in net assets resulting from capital share transactions

  (15,655,807)   (32,928,330)
Total decrease in net assets

  (13,086,778)   (19,398,347)
Net assets        
Beginning of period

  234,430,586   253,828,933
End of period

  $221,343,808   $234,430,586
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

56  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Statements of changes in net assets
  Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund
  Year ended
May 31, 2021
Year ended
May 31, 2020
Operations        
Net investment income

  $ 1,570,209   $ 3,517,264
Net realized gains on investments

  55,240,630   19,877,805
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments

  51,414,974   28,068,408
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

  108,225,813   51,463,477
Distributions to shareholders from        
Net investment income and net realized gains        
Class A

  (5,511,031)   (813,632)
Class C

  (46,615,891)   (4,579,863)
Institutional Class

  (150,799)   (28,805)
Total distributions to shareholders

  (52,277,721)   (5,422,300)
Capital share transactions Shares   Shares  
Proceeds from shares sold        
Class A

727,816 9,730,692 470,169 5,729,591
Class C

854,810 11,731,065 736,920 9,120,542
Institutional Class

526,569 7,041,595 450,633 5,535,084
    28,503,352   20,385,217
Reinvestment of distributions        
Class A

424,298 5,499,365 64,744 813,231
Class C

3,533,044 46,579,077 356,445 4,574,503
Institutional Class

11,400 148,048 2,256 28,316
    52,226,490   5,416,050
Payment for shares redeemed        
Class A

(780,095) (10,438,615) (867,171) (10,544,636)
Class C

(6,366,969) (87,080,597) (9,473,999) (117,217,925)
Institutional Class

(444,706) (5,953,456) (390,561) (4,802,340)
    (103,472,668)   (132,564,901)
Net decrease in net assets resulting from capital share transactions

  (22,742,826)   (106,763,634)
Total increase (decrease) in net assets

  33,205,266   (60,722,457)
Net assets        
Beginning of period

  526,076,349   586,798,806
End of period

  $ 559,281,615   $ 526,076,349
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  57


Financial highlights
Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class A 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 1
Net asset value, beginning of period

$18.59 $16.52 $20.55 $21.41 $20.15
Net investment income (loss)

0.14 0.19 0.17 2 0.10 (0.02) 2
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

6.65 2.11 (0.81) 2.59 1.28
Total from investment operations

6.79 2.30 (0.64) 2.69 1.26
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.22) (0.19) (0.26) 0.00 0.00
Net realized gains

(2.34) (0.04) (3.13) (3.55) 0.00
Total distributions to shareholders

(2.56) (0.23) (3.39) (3.55) 0.00
Net asset value, end of period

$22.82 $18.59 $16.52 $20.55 $21.41
Total return3

38.53% 13.91% (2.35)% 12.61% 6.25%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)          
Gross expenses*

0.77% 0.77% 0.76% 0.75% 0.75%
Net expenses*

0.75% 0.75% 0.75% 0.75% 0.75%
Net investment income (loss)

0.63% 1.08% 0.97% 0.75% (0.30)%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate4

82% 71% 78% 63% 30%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$66,239 $44,714 $42,588 $3,993 $1,669
    
* Including net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios, the expense ratios would be increased by the following amounts:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.15%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.18%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.18%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.12%
Year ended May 31, 20171 0.12%
    
1 For the period from February 10, 2017 (commencement of class operations) to May 31, 2017
2 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
3 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges. Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.
4 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the Fund’s ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. These purchases and sales amounts are aggregated with the direct purchases and sales in the affiliated Underlying Funds and unaffiliated securities and included in the portfolio turnover calculation.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

58  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Financial highlights
Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class C1 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$18.45 $16.39 $20.33 $21.36 $18.25
Net investment income (loss)

(0.03) 0.07 0.06 (0.02) 2 (0.07)
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

6.62 2.07 (0.82) 2.54 3.19
Total from investment operations

6.59 2.14 (0.76) 2.52 3.12
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.07) (0.04) (0.05) 0.00 0.00
Net realized gains

(2.34) (0.04) (3.13) (3.55) (0.01)
Total distributions to shareholders

(2.41) (0.08) (3.18) (3.55) (0.01)
Net asset value, end of period

$22.63 $18.45 $16.39 $20.33 $21.36
Total return3

37.57% 13.06% (3.16)% 11.80% 17.07%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)          
Gross expenses*

1.52% 1.52% 1.51% 1.50% 1.50%
Net expenses*

1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50%
Net investment income (loss)

(0.12)% 0.33% 0.32% (0.10)% (0.37)%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate4

82% 71% 78% 63% 30%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$378,941 $323,778 $355,837 $491,304 $532,454
    
* Including net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios, the expense ratios would be increased by the following amounts:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.15%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.18%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.18%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.12%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.12%
    
1 Effective at the close of business on February 10, 2017, the Fund’s existing share class, WealthBuilder Portfolio shares, was renamed Class C.
2 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
3 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges.
4 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the Fund’s ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. These purchases and sales amounts are aggregated with the direct purchases and sales in the affiliated Underlying Funds and unaffiliated securities and included in the portfolio turnover calculation.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  59


Financial highlights
Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Institutional Class 2021 2020 2019 1
Net asset value, beginning of period

$18.62 $16.55 $21.08
Net investment income

0.22 0.29 0.14
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

6.65 2.07 (1.26)
Total from investment operations

6.87 2.36 (1.12)
Distributions to shareholders from      
Net investment income

(0.28) (0.25) (0.28)
Net realized gains

(2.34) (0.04) (3.13)
Total distributions to shareholders

(2.62) (0.29) (3.41)
Net asset value, end of period

$22.87 $18.62 $16.55
Total return2

38.96% 14.26% (4.54)%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)      
Gross expenses*

0.43% 0.44% 0.43%
Net expenses*

0.42% 0.42% 0.42%
Net investment income

0.96% 1.40% 1.40%
Supplemental data      
Portfolio turnover rate3

82% 71% 78%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$7,962 $2,281 $1,172
    
* Including net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios, the expense ratios would be increased by the following amounts:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.15%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.18%
Year ended May 31, 20191 0.18%
    
1 For the period from July 31, 2018 (commencement of class operations) to May 31, 2019
2 Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.
3 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the Fund’s ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. These purchases and sales amounts are aggregated with the direct purchases and sales in the affiliated Underlying Funds and unaffiliated securities and included in the portfolio turnover calculation.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

60  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Financial highlights
Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class A 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 1
Net asset value, beginning of period

$10.92 $10.30 $10.90 $11.83 $11.56
Net investment income

0.14 0.15 0.19 2 0.18 2 0.07
Net realized and unrealized gains on investments

1.56 0.76 0.03 0.40 0.28
Total from investment operations

1.70 0.91 0.22 0.58 0.35
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.11) (0.21) (0.18) (0.50) (0.08)
Net realized gains

(0.78) (0.08) (0.64) (1.01) 0.00
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.89) (0.29) (0.82) (1.51) (0.08)
Net asset value, end of period

$11.73 $10.92 $10.30 $10.90 $11.83
Total return3

16.04% 8.95% 2.40% 4.87% 3.06%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)          
Gross expenses*

0.77% 0.77% 0.76% 0.75% 0.74%
Net expenses*

0.75% 0.75% 0.75% 0.75% 0.74%
Net investment income

1.07% 1.47% 1.81% 1.58% 1.03%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate4

152% 162% 155% 161% 136%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$40,354 $31,965 $34,104 $2,712 $800
    
* Including net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios, the expense ratios would be increased by the following amounts:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.15%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.16%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.16%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.13%
Year ended May 31, 20171 0.11%
    
1 For the period from February 10, 2017 (commencement of class operations) to May 31, 2017
2 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
3 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges. Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.
4 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the Fund’s ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. These purchases and sales amounts are aggregated with the direct purchases and sales in the affiliated Underlying Funds and unaffiliated securities and included in the portfolio turnover calculation.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  61


Financial highlights
Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class C1 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$11.14 $10.50 $11.10 $11.83 $11.40
Net investment income

0.04 0.09 0.12 2 0.09 0.06
Net realized and unrealized gains on investments

1.61 0.77 0.02 0.41 0.80
Total from investment operations

1.65 0.88 0.14 0.50 0.86
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.03) (0.14) (0.10) (0.22) (0.08)
Net realized gains

(0.78) (0.08) (0.64) (1.01) (0.35)
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.81) (0.22) (0.74) (1.23) (0.43)
Net asset value, end of period

$11.98 $11.14 $10.50 $11.10 $11.83
Total return3

15.17% 8.24% 1.58% 4.11% 7.75%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)          
Gross expenses*

1.52% 1.52% 1.51% 1.50% 1.49%
Net expenses*

1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 1.49%
Net investment income

0.31% 0.73% 1.13% 0.81% 0.52%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate4

152% 162% 155% 161% 136%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$336,665 $339,482 $393,207 $559,104 $707,284
    
* Including net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios, the expense ratios would be increased by the following amounts:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.15%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.16%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.17%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.13%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.11%
    
1 Effective at the close of business on February 10, 2017, the Fund’s existing share class, WealthBuilder Portfolio shares, was renamed Class C.
2 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
3 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges.
4 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the Fund’s ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. These purchases and sales amounts are aggregated with the direct purchases and sales in the affiliated Underlying Funds and unaffiliated securities and included in the portfolio turnover calculation.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

62  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Financial highlights
Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Institutional Class 2021 2020 2019 1
Net asset value, beginning of period

$10.94 $10.32 $11.06
Net investment income

0.17 0.20 0.14
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

1.57 0.74 (0.04)
Total from investment operations

1.74 0.94 0.10
Distributions to shareholders from      
Net investment income

(0.13) (0.24) (0.20)
Net realized gains

(0.78) (0.08) (0.64)
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.91) (0.32) (0.84)
Net asset value, end of period

$11.77 $10.94 $10.32
Total return2

16.44% 9.26% 1.28%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)      
Gross expenses*

0.44% 0.44% 0.43%
Net expenses*

0.42% 0.42% 0.42%
Net investment income

1.39% 1.80% 1.37%
Supplemental data      
Portfolio turnover rate3

152% 162% 155%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$3,114 $2,678 $1,817
    
* Including net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios, the expense ratios would be increased by the following amounts:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.15%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.16%
Year ended May 31, 20191 0.16%
    
1 For the period from July 31, 2018 (commencement of class operations) to May 31, 2019
2 Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.
3 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the Fund’s ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. These purchases and sales amounts are aggregated with the direct purchases and sales in the affiliated Underlying Funds and unaffiliated securities and included in the portfolio turnover calculation.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  63


Financial highlights
Spectrum Growth Fund
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class A 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 1
Net asset value, beginning of period

$12.70 $11.57 $13.88 $14.60 $13.92
Net investment income

0.13 0.15 0.14 2 0.12 0.01 2
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

3.24 1.17 (0.30) 1.39 0.67
Total from investment operations

3.37 1.32 (0.16) 1.51 0.68
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.13) (0.18) (0.23) (0.30) 0.00
Net realized gains

(1.48) (0.01) (1.92) (1.93) 0.00
Total distributions to shareholders

(1.61) (0.19) (2.15) (2.23) 0.00
Net asset value, end of period

$14.46 $12.70 $11.57 $13.88 $14.60
Total return3

27.87% 11.34% (0.38)% 10.33% 4.89%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)          
Gross expenses*

0.79% 0.79% 0.78% 0.78% 0.76%
Net expenses*

0.75% 0.75% 0.75% 0.75% 0.75%
Net investment income

0.90% 1.14% 1.20% 1.07% 0.16%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate4

100% 98% 97% 93% 58%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$31,295 $25,089 $23,420 $2,009 $357
    
* Including net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios, the expense ratios would be increased by the following amounts:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.14%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.16%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.17%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.12%
Year ended May 31, 20171 0.11%
    
1 For the period from February 10, 2017 (commencement of class operations) to May 31, 2017
2 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
3 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges. Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.
4 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the Fund’s ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. These purchases and sales amounts are aggregated with the direct purchases and sales in the affiliated Underlying Funds and unaffiliated securities and included in the portfolio turnover calculation.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

64  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Financial highlights
Spectrum Growth Fund
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class C1 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$12.96 $11.78 $14.02 $14.58 $13.39
Net investment income (loss)

0.02 0.06 0.08 0.04 (0.01) 2
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

3.30 1.20 (0.33) 1.34 1.84
Total from investment operations

3.32 1.26 (0.25) 1.38 1.83
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.02) (0.07) (0.07) (0.01) 0.00
Net realized gains

(1.48) (0.01) (1.92) (1.93) (0.64)
Total distributions to shareholders

(1.50) (0.08) (1.99) (1.94) (0.64)
Net asset value, end of period

$14.78 $12.96 $11.78 $14.02 $14.58
Total return3

26.86% 10.67% (1.12)% 9.45% 14.05%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)          
Gross expenses*

1.54% 1.53% 1.52% 1.51% 1.51%
Net expenses*

1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50%
Net investment income (loss)

0.15% 0.40% 0.56% 0.26% (0.06)%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate4

100% 98% 97% 93% 58%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$266,399 $241,980 $261,722 $354,185 $402,997
    
* Including net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios, the expense ratios would be increased by the following amounts:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.15%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.16%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.17%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.12%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.11%
    
1 Effective at the close of business on February 10, 2017, the Fund’s existing share class, WealthBuilder Portfolio shares, was renamed Class C.
2 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
3 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges.
4 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the Fund’s ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. These purchases and sales amounts are aggregated with the direct purchases and sales in the affiliated Underlying Funds and unaffiliated securities and included in the portfolio turnover calculation.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  65


Financial highlights
Spectrum Growth Fund
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Institutional Class 2021 2020 2019 1
Net asset value, beginning of period

$12.70 $11.57 $14.20
Net investment income

0.22 0.16 0.18
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

3.19 1.20 (0.65)
Total from investment operations

3.41 1.36 (0.47)
Distributions to shareholders from      
Net investment income

(0.17) (0.22) (0.24)
Net realized gains

(1.48) (0.01) (1.92)
Total distributions to shareholders

(1.65) (0.23) (2.16)
Net asset value, end of period

$14.46 $12.70 $11.57
Total return2

28.25% 11.71% (2.47)%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)      
Gross expenses*

0.46% 0.46% 0.45%
Net expenses*

0.42% 0.42% 0.42%
Net investment income

1.24% 1.44% 1.84%
Supplemental data      
Portfolio turnover rate3

100% 98% 97%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$2,589 $1,016 $699
    
* Including net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios, the expense ratios would be increased by the following amounts:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.14%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.16%
Year ended May 31, 20191 0.17%
    
1 For the period from July 31, 2018 (commencement of class operations) to May 31, 2019
2 Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.
3 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the Fund’s ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. These purchases and sales amounts are aggregated with the direct purchases and sales in the affiliated Underlying Funds and unaffiliated securities and included in the portfolio turnover calculation.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

66  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Financial highlights
Spectrum Income Allocation Fund
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class A 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 1
Net asset value, beginning of period

$10.40 $9.82 $10.05 $10.52 $10.34
Net investment income

0.11 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.04
Net realized and unrealized gains on investments

0.71 0.59 0.18 0.02 0.18
Total from investment operations

0.82 0.75 0.36 0.22 0.22
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.14) (0.17) (0.19) (0.19) (0.04)
Net realized gains

(0.58) 0.00 (0.40) (0.50) 0.00
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.72) (0.17) (0.59) (0.69) (0.04)
Net asset value, end of period

$10.50 $10.40 $9.82 $10.05 $10.52
Total return2

8.07% 7.72% 3.84% 2.05% 2.14%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)          
Gross expenses*

0.80% 0.80% 0.79% 0.77% 0.76%
Net expenses*

0.75% 0.75% 0.75% 0.75% 0.75%
Net investment income

1.04% 1.61% 2.15% 1.81% 1.34%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate3

206% 197% 183% 192% 175%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$24,170 $21,256 $16,242 $4,532 $4,468
    
* Including net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios, the expense ratios would be increased by the following amounts:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.16%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.15%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.16%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.13%
Year ended May 31, 20171 0.11%
    
1 For the period from February 10, 2017 (commencement of class operations) to May 31, 2017
2 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges. Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.
3 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the Fund’s ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. These purchases and sales amounts are aggregated with the direct purchases and sales in the affiliated Underlying Funds and unaffiliated securities and included in the portfolio turnover calculation.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  67


Financial highlights
Spectrum Income Allocation Fund
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class C1 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$10.36 $9.81 $10.06 $10.51 $10.33
Net investment income

0.03 0.09 0.14 2 0.11 0.07
Net realized and unrealized gains on investments

0.71 0.58 0.13 0.04 0.38
Total from investment operations

0.74 0.67 0.27 0.15 0.45
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.06) (0.12) (0.12) (0.10) (0.10)
Net realized gains

(0.58) 0.00 (0.40) (0.50) (0.17)
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.64) (0.12) (0.52) (0.60) (0.27)
Net asset value, end of period

$10.46 $10.36 $9.81 $10.06 $10.51
Total return3

7.25% 6.90% 2.89% 1.37% 4.42%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)          
Gross expenses*

1.55% 1.55% 1.54% 1.52% 1.50%
Net expenses*

1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50%
Net investment income

0.30% 0.89% 1.41% 1.05% 0.72%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate4

206% 197% 183% 192% 175%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$196,035 $212,465 $237,153 $319,498 $425,400
    
* Including net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios, the expense ratios would be increased by the following amounts:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.16%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.15%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.16%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.13%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.11%
    
1 Effective at the close of business on February 10, 2017, the Fund’s existing share class, WealthBuilder Portfolio shares, was renamed Class C.
2 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
3 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges.
4 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the Fund’s ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. These purchases and sales amounts are aggregated with the direct purchases and sales in the affiliated Underlying Funds and unaffiliated securities and included in the portfolio turnover calculation.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

68  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Financial highlights
Spectrum Income Allocation Fund
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Institutional Class 2021 2020 2019 1
Net asset value, beginning of period

$10.39 $9.80 $10.15
Net investment income

0.19 0.21 0.15
Net realized and unrealized gains on investments

0.68 0.57 0.12
Total from investment operations

0.87 0.78 0.27
Distributions to shareholders from      
Net investment income

(0.18) (0.19) (0.22)
Net realized gains

(0.58) 0.00 (0.40)
Total distributions to shareholders

(0.76) (0.19) (0.62)
Net asset value, end of period

$10.50 $10.39 $9.80
Total return2

8.51% 8.07% 2.95%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)      
Gross expenses*

0.47% 0.47% 0.46%
Net expenses*

0.42% 0.42% 0.42%
Net investment income

1.33% 1.96% 1.61%
Supplemental data      
Portfolio turnover rate3

206% 197% 183%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$1,139 $710 $434
    
* Including net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios, the expense ratios would be increased by the following amounts:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.16%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.15%
Year ended May 31, 20191 0.16%
    
1 For the period from July 31, 2018 (commencement of class operations) to May 31, 2019
2 Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.
3 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the Fund’s ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. These purchases and sales amounts are aggregated with the direct purchases and sales in the affiliated Underlying Funds and unaffiliated securities and included in the portfolio turnover calculation.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  69


Financial highlights
Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class A 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 1
Net asset value, beginning of period

$12.64 $11.64 $13.27 $14.24 $13.68
Net investment income

0.14 0.15 0.18 2 0.19 2 0.01
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

2.59 1.07 (0.14) 0.89 0.55
Total from investment operations

2.73 1.22 0.04 1.08 0.56
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.15) (0.21) (0.23) (0.42) 0.00
Net realized gains

(1.30) (0.01) (1.44) (1.63) 0.00
Total distributions to shareholders

(1.45) (0.22) (1.67) (2.05) 0.00
Net asset value, end of period

$13.92 $12.64 $11.64 $13.27 $14.24
Total return3

22.56% 10.49% 1.02% 7.51% 4.09%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)          
Gross expenses*

0.75% 0.76% 0.76% 0.75% 0.74%
Net expenses*

0.75% 0.75% 0.75% 0.75% 0.74%
Net investment income

0.96% 1.31% 1.51% 1.33% 0.54%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate4

120% 131% 126% 129% 102%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$56,004 $46,133 $46,380 $3,031 $1,464
    
* Including net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios, the expense ratios would be increased by the following amounts:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.15%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.16%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.17%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.12%
Year ended May 31, 20171 0.11%
    
1 For the period from February 10, 2017 (commencement of class operations) to May 31, 2017
2 Calculated based upon average shares outstanding
3 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges. Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.
4 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the Fund’s ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. These purchases and sales amounts are aggregated with the direct purchases and sales in the affiliated Underlying Funds and unaffiliated securities and included in the portfolio turnover calculation.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

70  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Financial highlights
Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Class C1 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Net asset value, beginning of period

$12.87 $11.85 $13.40 $14.21 $13.29
Net investment income

0.03 0.08 0.11 0.09 0.05
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

2.66 1.06 (0.14) 0.87 1.40
Total from investment operations

2.69 1.14 (0.03) 0.96 1.45
Distributions to shareholders from          
Net investment income

(0.04) (0.11) (0.08) (0.14) 0.00
Net realized gains

(1.30) (0.01) (1.44) (1.63) (0.53)
Total distributions to shareholders

(1.34) (0.12) (1.52) (1.77) (0.53)
Net asset value, end of period

$14.22 $12.87 $11.85 $13.40 $14.21
Total return2

21.79% 9.58% 0.31% 6.65% 11.14%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)          
Gross expenses*

1.50% 1.51% 1.50% 1.50% 1.49%
Net expenses*

1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 1.49%
Net investment income

0.21% 0.57% 0.84% 0.56% 0.30%
Supplemental data          
Portfolio turnover rate3

120% 131% 126% 129% 102%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$499,835 $477,998 $539,352 $732,031 $867,751
    
* Including net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios, the expense ratios would be increased by the following amounts:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.15%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.16%
Year ended May 31, 2019 0.17%
Year ended May 31, 2018 0.12%
Year ended May 31, 2017 0.11%
    
1 Effective at the close of business on February 10, 2017, the Fund’s existing share class, WealthBuilder Portfolio shares, was renamed Class C.
2 Total return calculations do not include any sales charges.
3 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the Fund’s ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. These purchases and sales amounts are aggregated with the direct purchases and sales in the affiliated Underlying Funds and unaffiliated securities and included in the portfolio turnover calculation.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  71


Financial highlights
Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund
(For a share outstanding throughout each period)
  Year ended May 31
Institutional Class 2021 2020 2019 1
Net asset value, beginning of period

$12.64 $11.65 $13.52
Net investment income

0.23 0.25 0.15
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments

2.55 1.01 (0.33)
Total from investment operations

2.78 1.26 (0.18)
Distributions to shareholders from      
Net investment income

(0.19) (0.26) (0.25)
Net realized gains

(1.30) (0.01) (1.44)
Total distributions to shareholders

(1.49) (0.27) (1.69)
Net asset value, end of period

$13.93 $12.64 $11.65
Total return2

22.99% 10.78% (0.62)%
Ratios to average net assets (annualized)      
Gross expenses*

0.42% 0.43% 0.43%
Net expenses*

0.42% 0.42% 0.42%
Net investment income

1.32% 1.63% 1.38%
Supplemental data      
Portfolio turnover rate3

120% 131% 126%
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)

$3,443 $1,945 $1,067
    
* Including net expenses allocated from the affiliated Master Portfolios, the expense ratios would be increased by the following amounts:
    
Year ended May 31, 2021 0.15%
Year ended May 31, 2020 0.16%
Year ended May 31, 20191 0.16%
    
1 For the period from July 31, 2018 (commencement of class operations) to May 31, 2019
2 Returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.
3 Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by multiplying the Fund’s ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. These purchases and sales amounts are aggregated with the direct purchases and sales in the affiliated Underlying Funds and unaffiliated securities and included in the portfolio turnover calculation.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

72  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Notes to financial statements
1. ORGANIZATION
Wells Fargo Funds Trust (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory trust organized on March 10, 1999, is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). As an investment company, the Trust follows the accounting and reporting guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, Financial Services – Investment Companies. These financial statements report on the following funds: Wells Fargo Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund ("Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund"), Wells Fargo Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund ("Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund"), Wells Fargo Spectrum Growth Fund ("Spectrum Growth Fund"), Wells Fargo Spectrum Income Allocation Fund ("Spectrum Income Allocation Fund"), Wells Fargo Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund ("Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund") (each, a “Fund”, collectively, the “Funds”). Each Fund is a diversified series of the Trust.
Effective at the close of business on October 30, 2020, each Fund changed its name and four of the Funds changed its investment strategy and revised its neutral asset allocation. The name changes of each Fund were as follows:
Former fund name New fund name
WealthBuilder Equity Fund Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund
WealthBuilder Moderate Balanced Fund Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund
WealthBuilder Growth Allocation Fund Spectrum Growth Fund
WealthBuilder Conservative Allocation Fund Spectrum Income Allocation Fund
WealthBuilder Growth Balanced Fund Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund
Each Fund is a fund-of-funds that may invest in various affiliated mutual funds, unaffiliated mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (collectively, the “Underlying Funds”) to pursue its investment objective. The Underlying Funds incur separate expenses in seeking to achieve their investment objectives. Investments in affiliated mutual funds may also include investments in one or more separate diversified portfolios (each, an “affiliated Master Portfolio”, collectively, the “affiliated Master Portfolios”) of Wells Fargo Master Trust, a registered open-end management investment company. Each affiliated Master Portfolio directly acquires portfolio securities, and each Fund investing in an affiliated Master Portfolio acquires an indirect interest in those securities. Each Fund accounts for its investment in the affiliated Master Portfolios as partnership investments and records on a daily basis its share of each affiliated Master Portfolio’s income, expense and realized and unrealized gains and losses. The financial statements for the Underlying Funds are presented in separate financial statements and may be obtained by contacting Investor Services for the affiliated mutual funds or by contacting the servicing agent of the unaffiliated mutual funds and exchange-traded funds. The financial statements of the affiliated Master Portfolios are available by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov and are filed with the SEC under Wells Fargo Master Trust. The financial statements for all other affiliated Underlying Funds are also publicly available on the SEC website at sec.gov.
On February 23, 2021, Wells Fargo & Company announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”) to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. WFAM is the trade name used by the asset management businesses of Wells Fargo & Company and includes Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the investment manager of each Fund, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, both registered investment advisers providing sub-advisory services to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, each Fund's principal underwriter. As part of the transaction, Wells Fargo & Company will own a 9.9% equity interest and will continue to serve as an important client and distribution partner.
Consummation of the transaction will result in the automatic termination of each Fund's investment management agreement and subadvisory agreement. Each Fund's Board of Trustees approved a new investment management and new subadvisory agreement and approved submitting the agreements to each Fund’s shareholders for approval at a special meeting of shareholders expected to be held on August 16, 2021. Shareholders of record of each Fund at the close of business on May 28, 2021 are entitled to vote at the meeting. If shareholders approve the new agreements, they would take effect upon the closing of the transaction. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
This shareholder report is not asking you for a proxy. A separate proxy statement with more detailed information about the transaction will be provided to Fund shareholders and should be reviewed carefully.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  73


Notes to financial statements
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following significant accounting policies, which are consistently followed in the preparation of the financial statements of the Funds, are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Securities valuation
All investments are valued each business day as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4 p.m. Eastern Time), although the Funds may deviate from this calculation time under unusual or unexpected circumstances.
Investments in the affiliated Master Portfolios are valued daily based on each Fund’s proportionate share of each affiliated Master Portfolio’s net assets, which are also valued daily.
Equity securities and futures contracts that are listed on a foreign or domestic exchange or market are valued at the official closing price or, if none, the last sales price. If no sale occurs on the principal exchange or market that day, a fair value price will be determined in accordance with each Fund’s Valuation Procedures.
Investments in registered open-end investment companies are valued at net asset value.
Investments in underlying mutual funds are valued at net asset per share as reported by the Underlying Funds as of the close of the regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange on each day the exchange is open for trading.
Investments which are not valued using any of the methods discussed above are valued at their fair value, as determined in good faith by the Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees has established a Valuation Committee comprised of the Trustees and has delegated to it the authority to take any actions regarding the valuation of portfolio securities that the Valuation Committee deems necessary or appropriate, including determining the fair value of portfolio securities, unless the determination has been delegated to the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee at Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC ("Funds Management"). The Board of Trustees retains the authority to make or ratify any valuation decisions or approve any changes to the Valuation Procedures as it deems appropriate. On a quarterly basis, the Board of Trustees receives reports on any valuation actions taken by the Valuation Committee or the Wells Fargo Asset Management Pricing Committee which may include items for ratification.
Futures contracts
Futures contracts are agreements between each Fund and a counterparty to buy or sell a specific amount of a commodity, financial instrument or currency at a specified price on a specified date. Each Fund may buy and sell futures contracts in order to gain exposure to, or protect against, changes in interest rates, security values and foreign exchange rates and is subject to interest rate risk, equity price risk and foreign currency risk. The primary risks associated with the use of futures contracts are the imperfect correlation between changes in market values of securities held by the Fund and the prices of futures contracts, and the possibility of an illiquid market. Futures contracts are generally entered into on a regulated futures exchange and cleared through a clearinghouse associated with the exchange. With futures contracts, there is minimal counterparty risk to the Fund since futures contracts are exchange traded and the exchange’s clearinghouse, as the counterparty to all exchange traded futures, guarantees the futures contracts against default.
Upon entering into a futures contract, the Fund is required to deposit either cash or securities (initial margin) with the broker in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the contract value. Subsequent payments (variation margin) are paid to or from the broker each day equal to the daily changes in the contract value. Such payments are recorded as unrealized gains or losses and, if any, shown as variation margin receivable (payable) in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities. Should the Fund fail to make requested variation margin payments, the broker can gain access to the initial margin to satisfy the Fund’s payment obligations. When the contracts are closed, a realized gain or loss is recorded in the Statements of Operations.
Investment transactions, income and expenses
Investments in affiliated Master Portfolios and securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains or losses are recorded on the basis of identified cost.
Each Fund records on a daily basis its proportionate share of each affiliated Master Portfolio’s income, expenses and realized and unrealized gains and losses. Each Fund also accrues its own expenses. Income from foreign securities in each affiliated Master Portfolio is recorded net of foreign taxes withheld where recovery of such taxes is not assured.
Income dividends and capital gain distributions from Underlying Funds are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Capital gain distributions from Underlying Funds are treated as realized gains.

74  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Notes to financial statements
Distributions to shareholders
Distributions to shareholders from net investment income and any net realized gains are recorded on the ex-dividend date for each Funds as follows:
  Net investment income Net realized gains
Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund Annually Annually
Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund Quarterly Annually
Spectrum Growth Fund Annually Annually
Spectrum Income Allocation Fund Monthly Annually
Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund Annually Annually
Federal and other taxes
Each Fund is treated as a separate entity for federal income tax purposes. Each Fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by distributing substantially all of its investment company taxable income and any net realized capital gains (after reduction for capital loss carryforwards) sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes. Accordingly, no provision for federal income taxes was required.
Each Fund’s income and federal excise tax returns and all financial records supporting those returns for the prior three fiscal years are subject to examination by the federal and Delaware revenue authorities. Management has analyzed each Funds' tax positions taken on federal, state, and foreign tax returns for all open tax years and does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability.
As of May 31, 2021, the aggregate cost of all investments for federal income tax purposes and the unrealized gains (losses) were as follows:
  Tax cost Gross
unrealized
gains
Gross
unrealized
losses
Net
unrealized
gains
Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund $329,471,778 $115,507,095 $ (74,462) $115,432,633
Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund 331,134,851 41,518,230 (871,877) 40,646,353
Spectrum Growth Fund 239,500,606 54,951,699 (171,523) 54,780,176
Spectrum Income Allocation Fund 205,884,191 10,960,582 (329,444) 10,631,138
Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund 463,822,123 85,618,189 (1,046,747) 84,571,442
Reclassifications are made to the Fund’s capital accounts for permanent tax differences to reflect income and gains available for distribution (or available capital loss carryforwards) under federal income tax regulations. U.S. generally accepted accounting principles require that certain components of net assets be adjusted to reflect permanent differences between financial and tax reporting. These reclassifications have no effect on net assets or net asset values per share. At May 31, 2021, as a result of permanent book-to-tax differences, the following reclassification adjustments were made on the Statements of Assets and Liabilities:
  Paid-in
capital
Total distributable
earnings
Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund $ (69,996) $ 69,996
Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund 498,358 (498,358)
Spectrum Growth Fund (274,514) 274,514
Spectrum Income Allocation Fund (203,157) 203,157
Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund (527,476) 527,476
As of May 31, 2021, the Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund had a qualified late-year ordinary loss of $1,137,589 which will be recognized on the first day of the following fiscal year.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  75


Notes to financial statements
Class allocations
The separate classes of shares offered by each Fund differ principally in applicable sales charges, distribution, shareholder servicing, and administration fees. Class specific expenses are charged directly to that share class. Investment income, common fund-level expenses, and realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative proportion of net assets of each class.
3. FAIR VALUATION MEASUREMENTS
Fair value measurements of investments are determined within a framework that has established a fair value hierarchy based upon the various data inputs utilized in determining the value of each Fund’s investments. The three-level hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). Each Fund’s investments are classified within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The inputs are summarized into three broad levels as follows:
Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical securities
Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs or methodologies used for valuing investments in securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used in valuing each Fund’s assets and liabilities as of May 31, 2021:
Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund Quoted prices
(Level 1)
Other significant
observable inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
unobservable inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Assets        
Investments in:        
Investment companies $ 137,415,343 $0 $0 $ 137,415,343
Short-term investments        
Investment companies 2,400,000 0 0 2,400,000
Investments measured at net asset value*       306,036,403
  139,815,343 0 0 445,851,746
Futures contracts 160,699 0 0 160,699
Total assets $139,976,042 $0 $0 $446,012,445
Liabilities        
Futures contracts $ 1,108,034 $0 $0 $ 1,108,034
Total liabilities $ 1,108,034 $0 $0 $ 1,108,034
    
* Investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amount presented in the table is intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities. The Fund’s investments in the affiliated Master Portfolios are valued at $306,036,403. Each affiliated Master Portfolio does not have a redemption period notice, can be redeemed daily and does not have any unfunded commitments.
    

76  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Notes to financial statements
Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund Quoted prices
(Level 1)
Other significant
observable inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
unobservable inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Assets        
Investments in:        
Investment companies $ 135,881,008 $0 $0 $ 135,881,008
Short-term investments        
Investment companies 1,280,700 0 0 1,280,700
Investments measured at net asset value*       235,508,593
  137,161,708 0 0 372,670,301
Futures contracts 209,172 0 0 209,172
Total assets $137,370,880 $0 $0 $372,879,473
Liabilities        
Futures contracts $ 1,098,269 $0 $0 $ 1,098,269
Total liabilities $ 1,098,269 $0 $0 $ 1,098,269
    
* Investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amount presented in the table is intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities. The Fund’s investments in the affiliated Master Portfolios are valued at $235,508,593. Each affiliated Master Portfolio does not have a redemption period notice, can be redeemed daily and does not have any unfunded commitments.
    
Spectrum Growth Fund Quoted prices
(Level 1)
Other significant
observable inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
unobservable inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Assets        
Investments in:        
Investment companies $ 119,853,594 $0 $0 $ 119,853,594
Short-term investments        
Investment companies 966,950 0 0 966,950
Investments measured at net asset value*       173,489,993
  120,820,544 0 0 294,310,537
Futures contracts 748,000 0 0 748,000
Total assets $121,568,544 $0 $0 $295,058,537
Liabilities        
Futures contracts $ 777,755 $0 $0 $ 777,755
Total liabilities $ 777,755 $0 $0 $ 777,755
    
* Investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amount presented in the table is intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities. The Fund’s investments in the affiliated Master Portfolios are valued at $173,489,993. Each affiliated Master Portfolio does not have a redemption period notice, can be redeemed daily and does not have any unfunded commitments.
    

Multi-Asset Funds  |  77


Notes to financial statements
Spectrum Income Allocation Fund Quoted prices
(Level 1)
Other significant
observable inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
unobservable inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Assets        
Investments in:        
Investment companies $ 60,590,866 $0 $0 $ 60,590,866
Short-term investments        
Investment companies 1,100,000 0 0 1,100,000
Investments measured at net asset value*       155,012,065
  61,690,866 0 0 216,702,931
Futures contracts 480,313 0 0 480,313
Total assets $62,171,179 $0 $0 $217,183,244
Liabilities        
Futures contracts $ 667,915 $0 $0 $ 667,915
Total liabilities $ 667,915 $0 $0 $ 667,915
    
* Investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amount presented in the table is intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities. The Fund’s investments in the affiliated Master Portfolios are valued at $155,012,065. Each affiliated Master Portfolio does not have a redemption period notice, can be redeemed daily and does not have any unfunded commitments.
    
Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund Quoted prices
(Level 1)
Other significant
observable inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
unobservable inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Assets        
Investments in:        
Investment companies $ 199,926,922 $0 $0 $ 199,926,922
Short-term investments        
Investment companies 2,652,130 0 0 2,652,130
Investments measured at net asset value*       345,842,651
  202,579,052 0 0 548,421,703
Futures contracts 1,452,793 0 0 1,452,793
Total assets $204,031,845 $0 $0 $549,874,496
Liabilities        
Futures contracts $ 1,480,931 $0 $0 $ 1,480,931
Total liabilities $ 1,480,931 $0 $0 $ 1,480,931
    
* Investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amount presented in the table is intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities. The Fund’s investments in the affiliated Master Portfolios are valued at $345,842,651. Each affiliated Master Portfolio does not have a redemption period notice, can be redeemed daily and does not have any unfunded commitments.
Futures contracts are reported at their cumulative unrealized gains (losses) at measurement date as reported in the table following the Portfolio of Investments. For futures contracts, the current day’s variation margin is reported on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. All other assets and liabilities are reported at their market value at measurement date.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the Funds did not have any transfers into/out of Level 3.

78  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Notes to financial statements
The investment objective of each affiliated Master Portfolio is as follows:
Affiliated Master Portfolio Investment objective
Wells Fargo Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate ex-Corporate Portfolio Seeks to replicate the total return of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate ex-Corporate Index, before fees and expenses
Wells Fargo Core Bond Portfolio Seeks total return, consisting of income and capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Disciplined Large Cap Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced International Equity Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Equity Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Factor Enhanced U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo High Yield Corporate Bond Portfolio Seeks to replicate the total return of the Wells Fargo U.S. High Yield Bond Index, before fees and expenses
Wells Fargo Real Return Portfolio Seeks returns that exceed the rate of inflation over the long-term
Wells Fargo Small Company Value Portfolio Seeks long-term capital appreciation
Wells Fargo Strategic Retirement Bond Portfolio Seeks to replicate the total return of a blended index that is weighted 50% to the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Treasury Inflation-Linked 1-10 Year Bond Index and 50% to the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Intermediate Government Bond Index, before fees and expenses
4. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
Management fee
Funds Management, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company ("Wells Fargo"), is the manager of each Fund and provides advisory and fund-level administrative services under an investment management agreement. Under the investment management agreement, Funds Management is responsible for, among other services, implementing the investment objectives and strategies of each Fund, supervising the subadviser and providing fund-level administrative services in connection with each Fund’s operations. As compensation for its services under the investment management agreement, Funds Management is entitled to receive a management fee at the following annual rate based on each Fund’s average daily net assets:
Average daily net assets Management fee
First $1 billion 0.250%
Next $4 billion 0.225
Next $5 billion 0.190
Over $10 billion 0.180
For the year ended May 31, 2021, the management fee was equivalent to an annual rate of 0.25% of each Fund’s average daily net assets.
Funds Management has retained the services of a subadviser to provide daily portfolio management to each Fund. The fee for subadvisory services is borne by Funds Management. Wells Capital Management Incorporated, an affiliate of Funds Management and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo, is the subadviser to each Fund and is entitled to receive an annual rate of 0.15% of each Fund average daily net assets.
Funds Management also serves as the adviser to each affiliated Master Portfolio and is entitled to receive a fee from each affiliated Master Portfolio for those services.
Administration fees
Under a class-level administration agreement, Funds Management provides class-level administrative services to each Fund, which includes paying fees and expenses for services provided by the transfer agent, sub-transfer agents, omnibus account

Multi-Asset Funds  |  79


Notes to financial statements
servicers and record-keepers. As compensation for its services under the class-level administration agreement, Funds Management receives an annual fee which is calculated based on the average daily net assets of each class as follows:
  Class-level
administration fee
Class A 0.21%
Class C 0.21
Institutional Class 0.13
Waivers and/or expense reimbursements
Funds Management has contractually waived and/or reimbursed management and administration fees to the extent necessary to maintain certain net operating expense ratios for each Fund. When each class of each Fund has exceeded its expense cap, Funds Management has waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses from fund-level expenses on a proportionate basis and then from class specific expenses. When only certain classes exceed their expense caps, waivers and/or reimbursements are applied against class specific expenses before fund-level expenses. Funds Management has committed through September 30, 2021 (September 30, 2022 for Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund) to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to cap expenses. Prior to or after the commitment expiration date, the caps may be increased or the commitment to maintain the caps may be terminated only with the approval of the Board of Trustees. The contractual expense caps are as follows:
  Expense ratio caps
Class A 0.75%
Class C 1.50
Institutional Class 0.42
Distribution fee
The Trust has adopted a Distribution Plan for Class C shares of the applicable Funds pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. A distribution fee is charged to Class C shares and paid to Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC ("Funds Distributor"), the principal underwriter of each Fund, at an annual rate of 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class C shares.
In addition, Funds Distributor is entitled to receive the front-end sales charge from the purchase of Class A shares and a contingent deferred sales charge on the redemption of certain Class A shares. Funds Distributor is also entitled to receive the contingent deferred sales charges from redemptions of Class C shares. For the year ended May 31, 2021, Funds Distributor received front-end sales charges and contingent deferred sales charges from the following Funds:
  Front-end
sales charges
  Contingent deferred
sales charges
  Class A   Class C
Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund $ 6,322   $ 1,864
Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund 6,732   864
Spectrum Growth Fund 4,905   1,313
Spectrum Income Allocation Fund 1,638   3,731
Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund 4,372   765
No contingent deferred sales charges were incurred by Class A shares of each Fund for the year ended May 31, 2021.
Shareholder servicing fees
The Trust has entered into contracts with one or more shareholder servicing agents, whereby Class A and Class C of each Fund are charged a fee at an annual rate of 0.25% of the average daily net assets of each respective class. A portion of these total shareholder servicing fees were paid to affiliates of Wells Fargo.

80  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Notes to financial statements
5. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS
Each Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing in affiliated Master Portfolios. Purchases and sales related to these investments have been calculated by aggregating the results of multiplying each Fund's ownership percentage in the respective affiliated Master Portfolio by the corresponding affiliated Master Portfolio’s purchases and sales. Purchases and sales in Underlying Funds in which the Fund invests are actual aggregate purchases and sales of those investments. Purchases and sales of investments, excluding short-term securities, for the year ended May 31, 2021 were as follows:
  Purchases at cost   Sales proceeds
  U.S.
government
Non-U.S.
government
  U.S.
government
Non-U.S.
government
Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund $ 0 $321,507,064   $ 0 365,079,248
Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund 357,273,922 211,836,511   326,374,381 237,804,768
Spectrum Growth Fund 55,195,169 218,304,257   45,036,430 220,360,399
Spectrum Income Allocation Fund 353,003,975 118,389,405   328,087,248 157,273,214
Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund 287,954,730 343,463,454   256,752,469 376,755,325
6. DERIVATIVE TRANSACTIONS
During the year ended May 31, 2021, the Funds entered into futures contracts to gain market exposure to certain asset classes consistent with an active asset allocation strategy. The volume of each Fund’s futures contracts during the year ended May 31, 2021 was as follows:
  Average notional balance
  Long
futures
Short
futures
Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund $47,600,770 $46,358,700
Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund 49,110,621 36,577,422
Spectrum Growth Fund 40,556,435 33,273,971
Spectrum Income Allocation Fund 32,541,997 26,205,139
Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund 78,519,311 62,488,041
A summary of the location of derivative instruments on the financial statements by primary risk exposure is outlined in the following tables.
The fair value of derivative instruments as of May 31, 2021 by primary risk type was as follows for the Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund:
  Asset derivatives   Liability derivatives
  Statements of Assets and
Liabilities location
Fair value   Statements of Assets and
Liabilities location
Fair value
Equity risk Unrealized gains on futures contracts $ 140,905*   Unrealized losses on futures contracts $ 1,108,034*
Foreign currency risk Unrealized gains on futures contracts 19,794*   Unrealized losses on futures contracts 0*
    $160,699     $1,108,034
* Amount represents the cumulative unrealized gains (losses) as reported in the table following the Portfolio of Investments. For futures contracts, only the current day's variation margin as of May 31, 2021 is reported separately on the Statements of Assets and Liabilities.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  81


Notes to financial statements
The effect of derivative instruments on the Statements of Operations for the year ended May 31, 2021 was as follows:
  Amount of realized
gains (losses) on
derivatives
Change in unrealized
gains (losses) on
derivatives
Equity risk $ 33,773 $(1,108,983)
Foreign currency risk (963,618) 181,183
  $(929,845) $ (927,800)
The fair value of derivative instruments as of May 31, 2021 by primary risk type was as follows for the Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund:
  Asset derivatives   Liability derivatives
  Statements of Assets and
Liabilities location
Fair value   Statements of Assets and
Liabilities location
Fair value
Equity risk Unrealized gains on futures contracts $ 192,336*   Unrealized losses on futures contracts $ 1,098,269*
Foreign currency risk Unrealized gains on futures contracts 16,836*   Unrealized losses on futures contracts 0*
    $209,172     $1,098,269
* Amount represents the cumulative unrealized gains (losses) as reported in the table following the Portfolio of Investments. For futures contracts, only the current day's variation margin as of May 31, 2021 is reported separately on the Statements of Assets and Liabilities.
The effect of derivative instruments on the Statements of Operations for the year ended May 31, 2021 was as follows:
  Amount of realized
gains (losses) on
derivatives
Change in unrealized
gains (losses) on
derivatives
Equity risk $ 9,054,000 $ (4,227,233)
Interest rate risk 457,105 0
Foreign currency risk (3,166,911) 185,094
  $ 6,344,194 $(4,042,139)
The fair value of derivative instruments as of May 31, 2021 by primary risk type was as follows for the Spectrum Growth Fund:
  Asset derivatives   Liability derivatives
  Statements of Assets and
Liabilities location
Fair value   Statements of Assets and
Liabilities location
Fair value
Equity risk Unrealized gains on futures contracts $ 734,804*   Unrealized losses on futures contracts $ 777,755*
Foreign currency risk Unrealized gains on futures contracts 13,196*   Unrealized losses on futures contracts 0*
    $748,000     $777,755
* Amount represents the cumulative unrealized gains (losses) as reported in the table following the Portfolio of Investments. For futures contracts, only the current day's variation margin as of May 31, 2021 is reported separately on the Statements of Assets and Liabilities.

82  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Notes to financial statements
The effect of derivative instruments on the Statements of Operations for the year ended May 31, 2021 was as follows:
  Amount of realized
gains (losses) on
derivatives
Change in unrealized
gains (losses) on
derivatives
Equity risk $ 3,068,867 $ (2,330,196)
Interest rate risk 349,824 0
Foreign currency risk (704,383) 130,804
  $2,714,308 $(2,199,392)
The fair value of derivative instruments as of May 31, 2021 by primary risk type was as follows for the Spectrum Income Allocation Fund:
  Asset derivatives   Liability derivatives
  Statements of Assets and
Liabilities location
Fair value   Statements of Assets and
Liabilities location
Fair value
Interest rate risk Unrealized gains on futures contracts $ 0*   Unrealized losses on futures contracts $ 23,184*
Equity risk Unrealized gains on futures contracts 470,530*   Unrealized losses on futures contracts 644,731*
Foreign currency risk Unrealized gains on futures contracts 9,783*   Unrealized losses on futures contracts 0*
    $480,313     $667,915
* Amount represents the cumulative unrealized gains (losses) as reported in the table following the Portfolio of Investments. For futures contracts, only the current day's variation margin as of May 31, 2021 is reported separately on the Statements of Assets and Liabilities.
The effect of derivative instruments on the Statements of Operations for the year ended May 31, 2021 was as follows:
  Amount of realized
gains (losses) on
derivatives
Change in unrealized
gains (losses) on
derivatives
Equity risk $ 4,396,772 $ (2,269,330)
Interest rate risk 328,463 (23,184)
Foreign currency risk (626,965) 115,462
  $4,098,270 $(2,177,052)
The fair value of derivative instruments as of May 31, 2021 by primary risk type was as follows for the Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund:
  Asset derivatives   Liability derivatives
  Statements of Assets and
Liabilities location
Fair value   Statements of Assets and
Liabilities location
Fair value
Equity risk Unrealized gains on futures contracts $ 1,428,107*   Unrealized losses on futures contracts $ 1,480,931*
Foreign currency risk Unrealized gains on futures contracts 24,686*   Unrealized losses on futures contracts 0*
    $1,452,793     $1,480,931
* Amount represents the cumulative unrealized gains (losses) as reported in the table following the Portfolio of Investments. For futures contracts, only the current day's variation margin as of May 31, 2021 is reported separately on the Statements of Assets and Liabilities.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  83


Notes to financial statements
The effect of derivative instruments on the Statements of Operations for the year ended May 31, 2021 was as follows:
  Amount of realized
gains (losses) on
derivatives
Change in unrealized
gains (losses) on
derivatives
Equity risk $ 6,993,908 $ (4,383,893)
Interest rate risk 672,652 0
Foreign currency risk (1,397,701) 259,219
  $ 6,268,859 $(4,124,674)
7. BANK BORROWINGS
The Trust (excluding the money market funds), Wells Fargo Master Trust and Wells Fargo Variable Trust are parties to a $350,000,000 revolving credit agreement whereby the Fund is permitted to use bank borrowings for temporary or emergency purposes, such as to fund shareholder redemption requests. Interest under the credit agreement is charged to each Fund based on a borrowing rate equal to the higher of the Federal Funds rate in effect on that day plus 1.25% or the overnight LIBOR rate in effect on that day plus 1.25%. In addition, an annual commitment fee equal to 0.25% of the unused balance is allocated to each participating fund.
For the year ended May 31, 2021, there were no borrowings by each Fund under the agreement.
8. DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS
The tax character of distributions paid during the years ended May 31, 2021 and May 31, 2020 were as follows:
  Ordinary income   Long-term capital gain
  2021 2020   2021 2020
Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund $ 6,231,697 $1,236,017   $40,196,774 $ 914,158
Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund 8,241,896 5,453,767   17,930,224 2,938,500
Spectrum Growth Fund 5,367,505 1,781,228   24,480,237 161,600
Spectrum Income Allocation Fund 7,360,080 3,065,148   6,712,300 0
Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund 13,066,589 5,114,579   39,211,132 307,721
As of May 31, 2021, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
  Undistributed
ordinary
income
Undistributed
long-term
gain
Unrealized
gains
Late-year
ordinary
losses
deferred
Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund $ 15,812,217 $ 12,294,892 $ 115,432,633 $ (1,137,589)
Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund 12,495,751 5,434,693 40,646,353 0
Spectrum Growth Fund 10,282,279 6,251,626 54,780,176 0
Spectrum Income Allocation Fund 4,606,835 1,626,393 10,631,138 0
Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund 14,302,179 12,647,991 84,571,442 0
9. INDEMNIFICATION
Under each Fund's organizational documents, the officers and Trustees have been granted certain indemnification rights against certain liabilities that may arise out of performance of their duties to each Fund. Each Fund has entered into a separate agreement with each Trustee that converts indemnification rights currently existing under each Fund’s organizational documents into contractual rights that cannot be changed in the future without the consent of the Trustee. Additionally, in the normal course of business, each Fund may enter into contracts with service providers that contain a variety of indemnification clauses. Each Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent on future claims that may be made against each Fund and, therefore, cannot be estimated.

84  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Notes to financial statements
10. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
In August 2018, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 updates the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Management has adopted this guidance which did not have a material impact on the financial statements.
11. CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization announced that it had made the assessment that coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) is a pandemic. The impacts of COVID-19 are affecting the entire global economy, individual companies and investment products, the funds, and the market in general. There is significant uncertainty around the extent and duration of business disruptions related to COVID-19 and the impacts may last for an extended period of time. COVID-19 has led to significant uncertainty and volatility in the financial markets.
12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
At a meeting held July 15, 2021, the Board of Trustees of the Wells Fargo Funds approved a change in the Funds' names to remove “Wells Fargo” from the Funds' names and replace with “Allspring”. The change is expected to go into effect on October 11, 2021.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) announced that it will be changing its company name to Allspring Global Investments upon the closing of the previously announced sale transaction of WFAM by Wells Fargo & Company to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. The new corporate name is expected to go into effect on the closing date of the transaction, which is anticipated to occur in the second half of 2021, subject to customary closing conditions.
Following the closing of the transaction, Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, the Funds' investment manager, Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited, each sub-advisers to certain funds, and Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC, the Funds' principal underwriter, will each be rebranded as Allspring.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  85


Report of independent registered public accounting firm
To the Shareholders of the Funds and Board of Trustees
Wells Fargo Funds Trust:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities of Wells Fargo Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund (formerly, Wells Fargo WealthBuilder Equity Fund), Wells Fargo Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund (formerly, Wells Fargo WealthBuilder Moderate Balanced Fund), Wells Fargo Spectrum Growth Fund (formerly, Wells Fargo WealthBuilder Growth Allocation Fund), Wells Fargo Spectrum Income Allocation Fund (formerly, Wells Fargo WealthBuilder Conservative Allocation Fund) and Wells Fargo Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund (formerly, Wells Fargo WealthBuilder Growth Balanced Fund) (collectively, the Funds), five of the funds constituting Wells Fargo Funds Trust, including the portfolios of investments, as of May 31, 2021, the related statements of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the financial statements) and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended. In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Funds as of May 31, 2021, the results of their operations for the year then ended, the changes in their net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Funds’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Funds in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and financial highlights, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. Such procedures also included confirmation of securities owned as of May 31, 2021, by correspondence with the custodian, transfer agents and brokers, or by other appropriate auditing procedures. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and financial highlights. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have not been able to determine the specific year that we began serving as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies; however, we are aware that we have served as the auditor of one or more Wells Fargo Funds investment companies since at least 1955.
Boston, Massachusetts
July 28, 2021

86  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Other information (unaudited)
TAX INFORMATION
For corporate shareholders, pursuant to Section 854 of the Internal Revenue Code, the percentage of ordinary income dividends qualifying for the corporate dividends-received deduction was as follows for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021:
  Dividends-received
deduction
Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund 52.00%
Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund 14.00
Spectrum Growth Fund 32.00
Spectrum Income Allocation Fund 6.00
Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund 21.00
Pursuant to Section 852 of the Internal Revenue Code, the following amounts were designated as a 20% rate gain distribution for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021:
  20% rate gain
distribution
Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund $40,196,774
Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund 17,930,224
Spectrum Growth Fund 24,480,237
Spectrum Income Allocation Fund 6,712,300
Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund 39,211,132
Pursuant to Section 854 of the Internal Revenue Code, the following amounts of income dividends paid during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 have been designated as qualified dividend income (QDI):
  QDI
Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund $3,980,446
Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund 1,676,945
Spectrum Growth Fund 2,583,670
Spectrum Income Allocation Fund 661,958
Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund 4,145,996
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, the following amounts have been designated as interest-related dividends for nonresident alien shareholders pursuant to Section 871 of the Internal Revenue Code:
  Interest-related
dividends
Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund $ 924,593
Spectrum Growth Fund 315,437
Spectrum Income Allocation Fund 1,370,505
Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund 1,378,041

Multi-Asset Funds  |  87


Other information (unaudited)
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, the following amounts have been designated as short-term capital gain dividends for nonresident alien shareholders pursuant to Section 871 of the Internal Revenue Code:
  Short-term capital
gain dividends
Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund $ 4,349,410
Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund 7,086,010
Spectrum Growth Fund 4,612,906
Spectrum Income Allocation Fund 5,913,725
Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund 10,798,929
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, the percentage of ordinary income distributed which was derived from interest on U.S. government securities was as follows:
  % of U.S.
government
income
Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund 2.00%
Spectrum Income Allocation Fund 3.00
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, pursuant to Section 163(j) of the Internal Revenue Code, the Funds had the following percent of ordinary income dividends qualify as interest dividends for corporate shareholders:
  % of interest
income
Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund 9.00%
Spectrum Growth Fund 3.00
Spectrum Income Allocation Fund 8.00
Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund 5.00
PROXY VOTING INFORMATION
A description of the policies and procedures used to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-222-8222, visiting our website at wfam.com, or visiting the SEC website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the proxies related to portfolio securities were voted during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the website at wfam.com or by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS INFORMATION
Each Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year as an exhibit to its reports on Form N-PORT. Shareholders may view the filed Form N-PORT by visiting the SEC website at sec.gov.

88  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Other information (unaudited)
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS
Each of the Trustees and Officers listed in the table below acts in identical capacities for each fund in the Wells Fargo family of funds, which consists of 139 mutual funds comprising the Wells Fargo Funds Trust, Wells Fargo Variable Trust, Wells Fargo Master Trust and four closed-end funds (collectively the “Fund Complex”). This table should be read in conjunction with the Prospectus and the Statement of Additional Information1. The mailing address of each Trustee and Officer is 525 Market Street, 12th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105. Each Trustee and Officer serves an indefinite term, however, each Trustee serves such term until reaching the mandatory retirement age established by the Trustees.
Independent Trustees
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service*
Principal occupations during past five years or longer Current other
public company or
investment
company
directorships
William R. Ebsworth
(Born 1957)
Trustee,
since 2015
Retired. From 1984 to 2013, equities analyst, portfolio manager, research director and chief investment officer at Fidelity Management and Research Company in Boston, Tokyo, and Hong Kong, and retired in 2013 as Chief Investment Officer of Fidelity Strategic Advisers, Inc. where he led a team of investment professionals managing client assets. Prior thereto, Board member of Hong Kong Securities Clearing Co., Hong Kong Options Clearing Corp., the Thailand International Fund, Ltd., Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company, and Empire Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company. Audit Committee Chair and Investment Committee Chair of the Vincent Memorial Hospital Endowment (non-profit organization). Mr. Ebsworth is a CFA® charterholder. N/A
Jane A. Freeman
(Born 1953)
Trustee,
since 2015;
Chair Liaison,
since 2018
Retired. From 2012 to 2014 and 1999 to 2008, Chief Financial Officer of Scientific Learning Corporation. From 2008 to 2012, Ms. Freeman provided consulting services related to strategic business projects. Prior to 1999, Portfolio Manager at Rockefeller & Co. and Scudder, Stevens & Clark. Board member of the Harding Loevner Funds from 1996 to 2014, serving as both Lead Independent Director and chair of the Audit Committee. Board member of the Russell Exchange Traded Funds Trust from 2011 to 2012 and the chair of the Audit Committee. Ms. Freeman is also an inactive Chartered Financial Analyst. N/A
Isaiah Harris, Jr.
(Born 1952)
Trustee,
since 2009; Audit
Committee
Chair,
since 2019
Retired. Chairman of the Board of CIGNA Corporation since 2009, and Director since 2005. From 2003 to 2011, Director of Deluxe Corporation. Prior thereto, President and CEO of BellSouth Advertising and Publishing Corp. from 2005 to 2007, President and CEO of BellSouth Enterprises from 2004 to 2005 and President of BellSouth Consumer Services from 2000 to 2003. Emeritus member of the Iowa State University Foundation Board of Governors. Emeritus Member of the Advisory Board of Iowa State University School of Business. Advisory Board Member, Palm Harbor Academy (private school). Mr. Harris is a certified public accountant (inactive status). CIGNA Corporation
Judith M. Johnson
(Born 1949)
Trustee,
since 2008
Retired. Prior thereto, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund from 1996 to 2008. Ms. Johnson is an attorney, certified public accountant and a certified managerial accountant. N/A
David F. Larcker
(Born 1950)
Trustee,
since 2009
James Irvin Miller Professor of Accounting at the Graduate School of Business (Emeritus), Stanford University, Director of the Corporate Governance Research Initiative and Senior Faculty of The Rock Center for Corporate Governance since 2006. From 2005 to 2008, Professor of Accounting at the Graduate School of Business, Stanford University. Prior thereto, Ernst & Young Professor of Accounting at The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania from 1985 to 2005. N/A

Multi-Asset Funds  |  89


Other information (unaudited)
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service*
Principal occupations during past five years or longer Current other
public company or
investment
company
directorships
Olivia S. Mitchell
(Born 1953)
Trustee,
since 2006;
Nominating and
Governance
Committee Chair,
since 2018
International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans Professor, Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania since 1993. Director of Wharton’s Pension Research Council and Boettner Center on Pensions & Retirement Research, and Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. Previously, Cornell University Professor from 1978 to 1993. N/A
Timothy J. Penny
(Born 1951)
Trustee,
since 1996;
Chair,
since 2018
President and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Minnesota Initiative Foundation, a non-profit organization, since 2007. Member of the Board of Trustees of NorthStar Education Finance, Inc., a non-profit organization, since 2007. N/A
James G. Polisson
(Born 1959)
Trustee,
since 2018
Retired. Chief Marketing Officer, Source (ETF) UK Services, Ltd, from 2015 to 2017. From 2012 to 2015, Principal of The Polisson Group, LLC, a management consulting, corporate advisory and principal investing company. Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director at Russell Investments, Global Exchange Traded Funds from 2010 to 2012. Managing Director of Barclays Global Investors from 1998 to 2010 and Global Chief Marketing Officer for iShares and Barclays Global Investors from 2000 to 2010. Trustee of the San Francisco Mechanics’ Institute, a non-profit organization, from 2013 to 2015. Board member of the Russell Exchange Traded Fund Trust from 2011 to 2012. Director of Barclays Global Investors Holdings Deutschland GmbH from 2006 to 2009. Mr. Polisson is an attorney and has a retired status with the Massachusetts and District of Columbia Bar Associations. N/A
Pamela Wheelock
(Born 1959)
Trustee,
since January
2020; previously
Trustee from
January 2018 to
July 2019
Board member of the Destination Medical Center Economic Development Agency, Rochester, Minnesota since 2019. Interim President of the McKnight Foundation from January to September 2020. Acting Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Human Services, July 2019 through September 2019. Human Services Manager (part-time), Minnesota Department of Human Services, October 2019 through December 2019. Chief Operating Officer, Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity from 2017 to 2019. Vice President of University Services, University of Minnesota from 2012 to 2016. Prior thereto, on the Board of Directors, Governance Committee and Finance Committee for the Minnesota Philanthropy Partners (Saint Paul Foundation) from 2012 to 2018, Interim Chief Executive Officer of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota from 2011 to 2012, Chairman of the Board from 2009 to 2012 and Board Director from 2003 to 2015. Vice President, Leadership and Community Engagement, Bush Foundation, Saint Paul, Minnesota (a private foundation) from 2009 to 2011. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Minnesota Sports and Entertainment from 2004 to 2009 and Senior Vice President from 2002 to 2004. Executive Vice President of the Minnesota Wild Foundation from 2004 to 2008. Commissioner of Finance, State of Minnesota, from 1999 to 2002. Currently Board Chair of the Minnesota Wild Foundation since 2010. N/A
*  Length of service dates reflect the Trustee’s commencement of service with the Trust’s predecessor entities, where applicable.

90  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Other information (unaudited)
Officers
Name and
year of birth
Position held and
length of service
Principal occupations during past five years or longer
Andrew Owen
(Born 1960)
President,
since 2017
Executive Vice President of Wells Fargo & Company and Head of Affiliated Managers, Wells Fargo Asset Management, since 2014. In addition, Mr. Owen is currently President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC since 2017. Prior thereto, Executive Vice President responsible for marketing, investments and product development for Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, from 2009 to 2014.
Jeremy DePalma
(Born 1974)
Treasurer,
since 2012
(for certain funds in
the Fund Complex);
since 2021 (for
the remaining funds in the
Fund Complex)
Senior Vice President of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC since 2009. Senior Vice President of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC from 2008 to 2010 and head of the Fund Reporting and Control Team within Fund Administration from 2005 to 2010.
Michelle Rhee
(Born 1966)
Chief Legal Officer,
since 2019
Secretary of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC and Chief Legal Counsel of Wells Fargo Asset Management since 2018. Deputy General Counsel of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. since 2020 and Assistant General Counsel of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. from 2018 to 2020. Associate General Counsel and Managing Director of Bank of America Corporation from 2004 to 2018.
Catherine Kennedy
(Born 1969)
Secretary,
since 2019
Vice President of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC and Senior Counsel of the Wells Fargo Legal Department since 2010. Vice President and Senior Counsel of Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC from 1998 to 2010.
Michael H. Whitaker
(Born 1967)
Chief Compliance Officer,
since 2016
Chief Compliance Officer of Wells Fargo Asset Management since 2016. Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer for Fidelity Investments from 2007 to 2016.
1  The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about the Trustees and is available, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-222-8222 or by visiting the website at wfam.com.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  91


Other information (unaudited)
LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
In accordance with Rule 22e-4 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Liquidity Rule”), Wells Fargo Funds Trust (the “Trust”) has adopted and implemented a liquidity risk management program (the “Program”) on behalf of each of its series, including each Fund, which is reasonably designed to assess and manage the Fund's liquidity risk. “Liquidity risk” is defined under the Liquidity Rule as the risk that a Fund is unable to meet redemption requests without significantly diluting remaining investors’ interests in the Fund. The Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”) previously approved the designation of Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”), each Fund's investment manager, as the administrator of the Program, and Funds Management has established a Liquidity Risk Management Council (the "Council") composed of personnel from multiple departments within Funds Management and its affiliates to assist Funds Management in the implementation and on-going administration of the Program.
The Program is comprised of various components designed to support the assessment and/or management of liquidity risk, including: (1) the periodic assessment (no less frequently than annually) of certain factors that influence a Fund's liquidity risk; (2) the periodic classification (no less frequently than monthly) of a Fund's investments into one of four liquidity categories that reflect an estimate of their liquidity under current market conditions; (3) a 15% limit on the acquisition of “illiquid investments” (as defined under the Liquidity Rule); (4) to the extent a Fund does not invest primarily in “highly liquid investments” (as defined under the Liquidity Rule), the determination of a minimum percentage of the Fund's assets that generally will be invested in highly liquid investments (an “HLIM”); (5) if a Fund has established an HLIM, the periodic review (no less frequently than annually) of the HLIM and the adoption of policies and procedures for responding to a shortfall of the Fund's “highly liquid investments” below its HLIM; and (6) periodic reporting to the Board.
At a meeting of the Board held on May 17-19, 2021, the Board received and reviewed a written report (the “Report”) from Funds Management that addressed the operation of the Program and assessed its adequacy and effectiveness for the period from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 (the “Reporting Period”). Among other things, the Report discussed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on liquidity and management of liquidity risk during the Reporting Period, including during the stressed market conditions caused by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. No significant liquidity events impacting any Fund were noted in the Report. As applicable to the Funds, there were no material changes to the Program during the Reporting Period.
Funds Management concluded in the Report that the Program is operating effectively to assess and manage each Fund’s liquidity risk, and that the Program has been and continues to be adequately and effectively implemented to monitor and, as applicable, respond to the Fund’s liquidity developments.
There can be no assurance that the Program will achieve its objectives under all circumstances in the future. Please refer to a Fund’s prospectus for more information regarding the Fund’s exposure to liquidity risk and other risks to which an investment in the Fund may be subject.

92  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Board considerations (unaudited)
BOARD CONSIDERATION OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AND SUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENTS:
Board Considerations – Current Agreements
Under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Wells Fargo Funds Trust (the “Trust”) must determine annually whether to approve the continuation of the Trust’s investment management and sub-advisory agreements. In this regard, at a Board meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Meeting”), the Board, all the members of which have no direct or indirect interest in the investment management and sub-advisory agreements and are not “interested persons” of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), reviewed and approved for each of the funds of the Trust identified above (each, a “Fund” and collectively, the “Funds”): (i) an investment management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”); and (ii) an investment sub-advisory agreement (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Wells Capital Management Incorporated (the “Sub-Adviser”), an affiliate of Funds Management. The Management Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement are collectively referred to as the “Advisory Agreements.”
The Board noted that Wells Fargo & Company recently announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”), which includes Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser, to GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. and/or their affiliates (the “Transaction”). The Board further noted that the Transaction would result in a change-of-control of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser, which would be considered to be an assignment that would result in the termination of the Advisory Agreements. In light of the Transaction, the Board separately considered for approval a new investment management agreement with Funds Management and a new sub-advisory agreement with the Sub-Adviser (the “New Agreements”) that would replace the Advisory Agreements upon consummation of the Transaction, subject to approval of the New Agreements by the Funds’ shareholders. The Board also considered for approval interim agreements to go into effect in the event shareholders do not approve the New Agreements before the Transaction is completed. The interim agreements would allow the Manager and the Sub-Adviser to continue providing services to the Funds while the Funds continues to seek shareholder approval of the New Agreements. The Board noted that the terms of the interim agreements would be identical to those of the current Advisory Agreements, except for the term and certain escrow provisions.
At the Meeting, the Board considered the factors and reached the conclusions described below relating to the selection of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser and the approval of the Advisory Agreements. Prior to the Meeting, including at Board meetings held in April and May 2021, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with representatives of Funds Management about these matters. Also, the Board has adopted a team-based approach, with each team consisting of a sub-set of Trustees, to assist the full Board in the discharge of its duties in reviewing investment performance and other matters throughout the year. The Independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Advisory Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately.
In providing information to the Board, Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser were guided by a detailed set of requests for information submitted to them by independent legal counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees at the start of the Board’s annual contract renewal process earlier in 2021. In considering and approving the Advisory Agreements, the Trustees considered the information they believed relevant, including but not limited to the information discussed below. The Board considered not only the specific information presented in connection with the Meeting, but also the knowledge gained over time through interaction with Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser about various topics. In this regard, the Board reviewed reports of Funds Management at each of its quarterly meetings, which included, among other things, portfolio reviews and investment performance reports. In addition, the Board and the teams mentioned above confer with portfolio managers at various times throughout the year. The Board did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each individual Trustee may have attributed different weights to various factors.
After its deliberations, the Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser under each of the Advisory Agreements was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Advisory Agreements for a one-year term. The Board considered the approval of the Advisory Agreements for the Funds as part of its consideration of agreements for funds across the complex, but its approvals were made on a fund-by-fund basis. The following summarizes a number of important, but not necessarily all, factors considered by the Board in support of its approvals.
Nature, extent and quality of services
The Board received and considered various information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser under the Advisory Agreements. This information included a description of the investment advisory services and Fund-level administrative services covered by the Management Agreement, as well as, among other things, a summary of the background and experience of senior management of WFAM, of which Funds Management and

Multi-Asset Funds  |  93


Board considerations (unaudited)
the Sub-Adviser are a part, and a summary of investments made in the business of WFAM. The Board also received a description of Funds Management’s and the Sub-Adviser’s business continuity plans, including a summary of the performance of such plans and any changes thereto during the COVID-19 pandemic, and of their approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity. The Board also received and reviewed information about Funds Management’s role as administrator of the Funds’ liquidity risk management program, Funds Management’s approach to risk management, and Funds Management’s intermediary and vendor oversight program.
The Board also considered the qualifications, background, tenure and responsibilities of each of the portfolio managers primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the Funds. The Board evaluated the ability of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser to attract and retain qualified investment professionals, including research, advisory and supervisory personnel.
The Board further considered the compliance programs and compliance records of Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser. In addition, the Board took into account the full range of services provided to the Funds by Funds Management and its affiliates. The Board also considered information about retention and back-up arrangements that have been put into place with respect to key personnel of WFAM in connection with the anticipated Transaction, noting that WFAM provided assurances that the announcement and eventual culmination of the Transaction is not expected to result in any diminution in the nature or quality of services provided to the Funds.
Fund investment performance and expenses
The Board considered the investment performance results for each of the Funds over various time periods ended December 31, 2020. The Board considered these results in comparison to the investment performance of funds in a universe that was determined by Broadridge Inc. (“Broadridge”) to be similar to each respective Fund (each, a “Universe”), and in comparison to each Fund’s benchmark index and to other comparative data. Broadridge is an independent provider of investment company data. The Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in each performance Universe.
The Board noted that the investment performance of each Fund (Class A) relative to its respective Universe was as follows: (i) the investment performance of the Wells Fargo Spectrum Income Allocation Fund was higher than its Universe for the one- and three-year periods and was lower than its Universe for the five- and ten-year periods; (ii) the investment performance of the Wells Fargo Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund was higher than its Universe for all period under review; (iii) the investment performance of the Wells Fargo Spectrum Growth Fund was higher than its Universe for all period under review; (iv) the investment performance of the Wells Fargo Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund was higher than or in range of its Universe for all period under review except for the ten-year period; and (v) the investment performance of the Wells Fargo Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund was higher than its Universe for the one- and three-year periods and was lower than its Universe for the five- and ten-year periods.
The Board also noted that the investment performance of each Fund (Class A) relative to its respective benchmark index was as follows: (i) the investment performance of the Wells Fargo Spectrum Income Allocation Fund was higher than its benchmark index, the Spectrum Income Allocation Blended Index, for the one- year period and was lower than the average investment performance of its benchmark index for the three, five- and ten-year periods; (ii) the investment performance of the Wells Fargo Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund was higher than or in range of its benchmark index, the Spectrum Aggressive Growth Blended Index, for the one- and three-year periods and was lower than the average investment performance of its benchmark index for the five- and ten-year periods; (iii) the investment performance of the Wells Fargo Spectrum Growth Fund was higher than or in range of its benchmark index, the Spectrum Growth Blended Index, for the one- and three-year periods and was lower than the average investment performance of its benchmark index for the five- and ten-year periods; (iv) the investment performance of the Wells Fargo Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund was higher its benchmark index, the Spectrum Moderate Growth Blended Index, for the one-year period and was lower than the average investment performance of its benchmark index for the three , five- and ten-year periods; and (v) the investment performance of the Wells Fargo Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund was higher than its benchmark index, the Spectrum Conservative Growth Blended Index, for the one- year period and was lower than the average investment performance of its benchmark index for the three-, five- and ten-year periods.
The Board received information concerning, and discussed factors contributing to, the underperformance of the Funds for the periods identified above. The Board took note of the explanations for the underperformance relative to the Universe and benchmark index for the periods identified above, including with respect to investment decisions and market factors that affected each Fund’s investment performance. The Board also took note of the changes to such Funds’ investment process that were implemented in 2017 and 2020 to improve the Funds’ performance.
The Board also received and considered information regarding each Fund’s net operating expense ratios and their various components, including actual management fees, custodian and other non-management fees, and Rule 12b-1 and non-Rule 12b-1

94  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Board considerations (unaudited)
shareholder service fees. The Board considered these ratios for each Fund in comparison to the median ratios of funds in class-specific expense groups that were determined by Broadridge to be similar to each Fund (the “Groups”). The Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the expense Groups and an explanation of how funds comprising expense groups and their expense ratios may vary from year-to-year.
Based on the Broadridge reports, the Board noted that the net operating expense ratios of each of the Funds were equal to, lower than, or in range of the median net operating expense ratio of each Fund’s respective expense Group for all share classes. The Board noted that the Funds invest in both affiliated and unaffiliated underlying mutual funds, while most of the funds included in each expense Group, and all of the funds identified by Funds Management as being in a competitor sub-group, invest only in affiliated funds. The Board also considered that the Funds are designed to offer exposure to a wide range of investment styles, including alternatives, while maintaining a low investment minimum.
The Board took into account each Fund’s investment performance and expense information provided to it among the factors considered in deciding to re-approve the Advisory Agreements.
Investment management and sub-advisory fee rates
The Board reviewed and considered the contractual fee rates payable by each Fund to Funds Management under the Management Agreement, as well as the contractual fee rates payable by each Fund to Funds Management for class-level administrative services under a Class-Level Administration Agreement, which include, among other things, class-level transfer agency and sub-transfer agency costs (collectively, the “Management Rates”). The Board also reviewed and considered the contractual investment sub-advisory fee rates that are payable by Funds Management to the Sub-Adviser for investment sub-advisory services.
Among other information reviewed by the Board was a comparison of each Fund’s Management Rates with the average contractual investment management fee rates of funds in the expense Groups at a common asset level as well as transfer agency costs of the funds in the expense Groups. The Board noted that the Management Rates of each Fund were higher than the sum of these average rates for the expense Groups for all share classes, except for the Class A shares of the Wells Fargo Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund, which was in range of the average rate for the Fund’s expense Group. The Board noted that the Funds are among the few funds-of-funds utilizing both affiliated and unaffiliated underlying funds, and received information from Funds Management about the process and resources required to evaluate and select unaffiliated underlying mutual funds.
The Board also received and considered information about the portion of the total management fee that was retained by Funds Management after payment of the fee to the Sub-Adviser for sub-advisory services. In assessing the reasonableness of this amount, the Board received and evaluated information about the nature and extent of responsibilities retained and risks assumed by Funds Management and not delegated to or assumed by the Sub-Adviser, and about Funds Management’s on-going oversight services. Given the affiliation between Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser, the Board ascribed limited relevance to the allocation of fees between them.
Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Board determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the Management Agreement and to the Sub-Adviser under the Sub-Advisory Agreement was reasonable.
Profitability
The Board received and considered information concerning the profitability of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo & Co. (“Wells Fargo”) from providing services to the fund family as a whole. The Board noted that the Sub-Adviser’s profitability information with respect to providing services to the Funds and other funds in the family was subsumed in the WFAM and Wells Fargo profitability analysis.
Funds Management reported on the methodologies and estimates used in calculating profitability, including a description of the methodology used to allocate certain expenses. Among other things, the Board noted that the levels of profitability reported on a fund-by-fund basis varied widely, depending on factors such as the size, type and age of fund.
Based on its review, the Board did not deem the profits reported by Funds Management, WFAM or Wells Fargo from services provided to the Funds to be at a level that would prevent it from approving the continuation of the Advisory Agreements.
Economies of scale
The Board received and considered information about the potential for Funds Management to experience economies of scale in the provision of management services to the Funds, the difficulties of calculating economies of scale at an individual fund level, and the extent to which potential scale benefits are shared with shareholders. The Board noted the existence of breakpoints in each Fund’s management fee structure, which operate generally to reduce the Fund’s expense ratios as the Fund grows in size, and the size of each Fund in relation to such breakpoints. The Board considered that in addition to management fee breakpoints,

Multi-Asset Funds  |  95


Board considerations (unaudited)
Funds Management shares potential economies of scale from its management business in a variety of ways, including through fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangements, competitive management fee rates set at the outset without regard to breakpoints, and investments in the business intended to enhance services available to shareholders.
The Board concluded that Funds Management’s arrangements with respect to the Funds, including contractual breakpoints, constituted a reasonable approach to sharing potential economies of scale with the Funds and their shareholders.
Other benefits to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser
The Board received and considered information regarding potential “fall-out” or ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including the Sub-Adviser, as a result of their relationships with the Funds. Ancillary benefits could include, among others, benefits directly attributable to other relationships with the Funds and benefits potentially derived from an increase in Funds Management’s and the Sub-Adviser’s business as a result of their relationships with the Funds. The Board noted that various affiliates of Funds Management may receive distribution-related fees, shareholder servicing payments and sub-transfer agency fees in respect of shares sold or held through them and services provided.
The Board also reviewed information about soft dollar credits earned and utilized by the Sub-Adviser, fees earned by Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser from managing a private investment vehicle for the fund family’s securities lending collateral and commissions earned by an affiliated broker from portfolio transactions.
Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Board did not find that any ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including the Sub-Adviser, were unreasonable.
Conclusion
At the Meeting, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Adviser under each of the Advisory Agreements was reasonable, and approved the continuation of the Advisory Agreements for a one-year term.

96  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board Considerations – New Agreements
Overview of the Board evaluation process
At a meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Board Meeting”), the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Wells Fargo Funds Trust (the “Trust”, and the series identified below, the “Funds”) approved the continuation of each Fund’s current Investment Management Agreement (the “Current Investment Management Agreement”) and the current Wells Cap Sub-Advisory Agreement (the “Current Wells Cap Sub-Advisory Agreement”, and collectively, the “Current Agreements”).
Wells Fargo Absolute Return Fund
Wells Fargo Core Plus Bond Fund
Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund
Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund
Wells Fargo Specialized Technology Fund
Wells Fargo Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund
Wells Fargo Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund
Wells Fargo Spectrum Growth Fund
Wells Fargo Spectrum Income Allocation Fund
Wells Fargo Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund
Each Trustee on the Board is not an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”)) of the Funds (collectively, the “Independent Trustees”). The process followed by the Board in considering and approving the continuation of the Current Agreements is referred to herein as the “2021 Annual Approval Process.”
As noted above, the closing of the sale of Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”) to a holding company (“NewCo”) affiliated with private funds of GTCR LLC (“GTCR”) and of Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. (“Reverence Capital”, and such transaction, the “Transaction”) will result in a change of control of Wells Fargo Funds Management LLC (“Funds Management”) and Wells Capital Management Incorporated (“Wells Capital”, and together with Funds Management, the “Advisers”), which will be considered to be an “assignment” of each Fund’s Current Agreements under the 1940 Act that will result in the automatic termination of each Fund’s Current Agreements. In light of the expected termination of each Fund’s Current Agreements upon the closing, at the Board Meeting the Board also considered and approved: (i) (i) a new Investment Management Agreement (the “New Investment Management Agreement”) between the Trust, on behalf of each Fund, and Funds Management; (ii) a new Sub-Advisory Agreement (the “New Wells Capital Sub-Advisory Agreement”) among the Trust, Funds Management and Wells Capital with respect to Core Plus Bond Fund, Growth Balanced Fund, Moderate Balanced Fund, Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund, Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund, Spectrum Growth Fund, Spectrum Income Allocation Fund, and Spectrum Moderate Growth Fund; and (iii) a new Sub-Advisory Agreement (the “New AllianzGI U.S. Sub-Advisory Agreement”, and collectively, the “New Agreements”) among the Trust, Funds Management and Allianz Global Investors U.S., LLC (“AllianzGI U.S.”, and together with Wells Capital, the “Sub-Advisers”) with respect to the Specialized Technology Fund, each of which is intended to go into effect upon the closing. The process followed by the Board in reviewing and approving the New Agreements is referred to herein as the “New Agreement Approval Process.”
At a series of meetings held in April and May 2021 (collectively, “April and May 2021 Meetings”) and at the Board Meeting, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital about the New Agreements and related matters. The Board reviewed and discussed information furnished by Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital that the Board considered reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the New Agreements and the services to be provided. At these meetings, senior representatives from Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital made presentations to, and responded to questions from, the Board.
In providing information to the Board in connection with the 2021 annual approval process for the Current Agreements (the “2021 Annual Approval Process”) and the New Agreement Approval Process, Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital (as applicable) were guided by requests for information submitted by independent legal counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees. In considering and approving the New Agreements, the Trustees considered the information they believed relevant, including but not limited to the information discussed herein. The Board considered not only the specific information presented in connection with the April and May 2021 Meetings as well as the Board Meeting, but also the knowledge gained over time through interaction with Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers about various topics. In this regard, the Board reviews reports of Funds Management at each of its regular Board meetings, which includes, among other things, portfolio reviews and investment

Multi-Asset Funds  |  97


Board considerations (unaudited)
performance reports. In addition, the Board confers with portfolio managers at various times throughout the year. The Board was assisted in its evaluation of the New Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom the Independent Trustees received separate legal advice and with whom the Independent Trustees met separately. The Board did not identify any particular information or consideration that was all-important or controlling, and each individual Trustee may have attributed different weights to various factors.
Among other information considered by the Board in connection with the Transaction was:
■  Information regarding the Transaction: information about the structure, financing sources and material terms and conditions of the Transaction, including the expected impact on the businesses conducted by the Advisers and by Wells Fargo Funds Distributor LLC, as the distributor of Fund shares.
■  Information regarding NewCo, GTCR and Reverence Capital: (i) information about NewCo, including information about its expected financial condition and access to capital, and senior leadership team; (ii) the experience of senior management at GTCR and Reverence Capital in acquiring portfolio companies; (iii) the plan to operationalize NewCo, including the transition of necessary infrastructure services through a transition services agreement with Wells Fargo under which Wells Fargo will continue to provide NewCo with certain services for a specified period of time after the closing; and (iv) information regarding regulatory matters, compliance, and risk management functions at NewCo, including resources to be dedicated thereto.
■  Impact of the Transaction on WFAM and Service Providers: (i) information regarding any changes to personnel and/or other resources of the Advisers as a result of the Transaction, including assurances regarding comparable and competitive compensation arrangements to attract and retain highly qualified personnel; and (ii) information about the organizational and operating structure with respect to NewCo, the Advisers and the Funds.
■  Impact of the Transaction on the Funds and their Shareholders: (i) information regarding anticipated benefits to the Funds as a result of the Transaction; (ii) a commitment that the Funds would not bear any expenses, directly or indirectly, in connection with the Transaction; (iii) confirmation that the Advisers intend to continue to manage the Funds in a manner consistent with each Fund’s current investment objectives and principal investments strategies; and (iv) a commitment that neither NewCo nor WFAM will take any steps that would impose any “unfair burden” (as that term is used in section 15(f)(1)(B) of the 1940 Act) on the Funds as a result of the Transaction.
With respect to the New Agreements, the Board considered: (i) a representation that, after the closing, all of the Funds will continue to be managed and advised by their current Advisers, and, for Specialized Technology Fund only, AllianzGI U.S., and that the same portfolio managers of the Sub-Advisers are expected to continue to manage the Funds after the Transaction; (ii) information regarding the terms of the New Agreements, including changes as compared to the Current Agreements; (iii) information confirming that the fee rates payable under the New Agreements will not increase as a result of the Transaction as compared to the rates under the Current Agreements; and (iv) assurances that the Transaction is not expected to cause any diminution with respect to the nature, extent and quality of any of the services currently provided to the Funds by the Advisers and, for Specialized Technology Fund only, AllianzGI U.S., as a result of the Transaction.
In addition to considering information furnished specifically to evaluate the impact of the Transaction on the Funds and their respective shareholders in connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board considered information furnished at prior meetings of the Board and its committees, including detailed information provided in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process. In this regard, in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board received information about complex-wide and individual Fund performance, fees and expenses, including: (i) a report from an independent data provider comparing the investment performance of each Fund to the investment performance of comparable funds and benchmark indices, over various time periods; (ii) a report from an independent data provider comparing each Fund’s total expense ratio (and its components) to those of comparable funds; (iii) comparative information concerning the fees charged and services provided by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to each Fund in managing other accounts (which may include other mutual funds, collective investment funds and institutional accounts), if any, that employ investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing such Fund(s); and (iv) profitability analyses of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo from providing services to the fund family as a whole.
After its deliberations, the Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the New Agreements is reasonable, approved the New Agreements for a two-year term, and voted to recommend that Fund shareholders approve the New Agreements. The Board considered the approval of the New Agreements as part of its consideration of agreements for funds across the complex, but its approvals were made on a fund-by-fund basis. The following summarizes a number of important, but not necessarily all, factors considered by the Board in support of its approvals.

98  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Board considerations (unaudited)
Nature, extent and quality of services
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board received and considered various information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers under the Advisory Agreements. This information included a description of the investment advisory services and Fund-level administrative services covered by the Current Management Agreement, as well as, among other things, a summary of the background and experience of senior management of WFAM, of which Funds Management and Wells Capital are a part, and a summary of investments made in the business of WFAM. The Board also received a description of Funds Management’s and the Sub-Advisers’ business continuity plans, including a summary of the performance of such plans and any changes thereto during the COVID-19 pandemic, and of their approaches to data privacy and cybersecurity. The Board also received and reviewed information about Funds Management’s role as administrator of the Funds’ liquidity risk management program, Funds Management’s approach to risk management, and Funds Management’s intermediary and vendor oversight program.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board also considered the qualifications, background, tenure and responsibilities of each of the portfolio managers primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the Funds. The Board evaluated the ability of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to attract and retain qualified investment professionals, including research, advisory and supervisory personnel.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board further considered the compliance programs and compliance records of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers. In addition, the Board took into account the full range of services provided to the Fund by Funds Management and its affiliates.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board considered, among other information, the structure of the Transaction and expected impact, if any, of the Transaction on the operations, facilities, organization and personnel of Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers. The Board received assurances from Funds Management that each Fund will continue to be advised by its current Sub-Adviser after the closing, and that the same individual portfolio managers are expected to continue to manage the Funds after the closing. With respect to the recruitment and retention of key personnel, the Board noted information from GTCR, Reverence Capital and the Advisers regarding the potential benefits for employees of joining NewCo. The Board recognized that the personnel who had been extended offers may not accept such offers and personnel changes may occur in the future in the ordinary course.
In addition, the Board considered information regarding the infrastructure, operational capabilities and support staff in place to assist in the portfolio management and operations of the Funds, including the provision of administrative services, and the anticipated impact of the Transaction on such matters. The Board also considered the business-related and other risks to which the Advisers may be subject in managing the Funds and in connection with the Transaction. The Board also considered the transition and integration plans as a result of the change in ownership of the Advisers from Wells Fargo to NewCo. The Board considered the resources and infrastructure that NewCo intends to devote to its compliance program to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations, as well as its risk management program and cybersecurity program. The Board also took into account assurances received from the Advisers, GTCR and Reverence Capital that the Transaction is not expected to cause any diminution in the nature, extent and quality of services provided by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to the Funds and their shareholders.
Fund investment performance and expenses
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board considered the investment performance results for each Fund over various time periods ended December 31, 2020. The Board considered these results in comparison to the investment performance of funds in a universe that was determined by Broadridge Inc. (“Broadridge”) to be similar to each Fund (the “Universe”), and in comparison to each Fund’s benchmark index and to other comparative data. Broadridge is an independent provider of investment company data. The Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the performance Universe. Where applicable, the Board received information concerning, and discussed factors contributing to, underperformance of Funds relative to the Universe and benchmark for any underperformance periods.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board also received and considered information regarding each Fund’s net operating expense ratios and their various components, including actual management fees, custodian and other non-management fees, and Rule 12b-1 and non-Rule 12b-1 shareholder service fees. The Board considered these ratios in comparison to the median ratios of funds in class-specific expense groups that were determined by Broadridge to be similar to the Fund (the “Groups”). The Board received a description of the methodology used by Broadridge to select the mutual funds in the expense Groups and an explanation of how funds comprising expense groups and their expense ratios may vary from year-to-year.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  99


Board considerations (unaudited)
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board received a commitment that WFAM will maintain fee and expense commitments for at least two years after the closing. The Board took into account each Fund’s investment performance and expense information among the factors considered in deciding to approve the New Agreements.
Investment management and sub-advisory fee rates
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board reviewed and considered the contractual fee rates payable by each Fund to Funds Management under the Current Management Agreement, as well as the contractual fee rates payable by each Fund to Funds Management for class-level administrative services under a Class-Level Administration Agreement, which include, among other things, class-level transfer agency and sub-transfer agency costs (collectively, the “Management Rates”). The Board also reviewed and considered the contractual investment sub-advisory fee rates that are payable by Funds Management to each of the Sub-Advisers under the Current Sub-Advisory Agreements for investment sub-advisory services (the “Sub-Advisory Fee Rates”).
Among other information reviewed by the Board in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, was a comparison of each Fund’s Management Rates with the average contractual investment management fee rates of funds in the expense Groups at a common asset level as well as transfer agency costs of the funds in the expense Groups.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board also received and considered information about the portion of the total management fee that was retained by Funds Management after payment of the Sub-Advisory Fee Rates. In assessing the reasonableness of this amount, the Board received and evaluated information about the nature and extent of responsibilities retained and risks assumed by Funds Management and not delegated to or assumed by the Sub-Advisers, and about Funds Management’s on-going oversight services. With respect to AllianzGI U.S., the Board also considered this amount in comparison to the median amount retained by advisers to funds in a sub-advised expense universe that was determined by Broadridge to be similar to the Specialized Technology Fund. In this regard, the Board noted the small size of the sub-advised expense universe. The Board also considered that the sub-advisory fees paid to AllianzGI U.S. had been negotiated by Funds Management on an arm’s length basis. Given the affiliation between Funds Management and Wells Capital, the Board ascribed limited relevance to the allocation of fees between them.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board also received and considered information about the nature and extent of services offered and fee rates charged by Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to other types of clients, if any, with investment strategies similar to those of each Fund. In this regard, the Board received information about the significantly greater scope of services, and compliance, reporting and other legal burdens and risks of managing proprietary mutual funds compared with those associated with managing assets of other types of clients, including third-party sub-advised fund clients and non-mutual fund clients such as institutional separate accounts.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board noted the assurances received by it that there would be no increases to any of the Management Rates or the Sub-Advisory Fee Rates as a result of the Transaction. The Board also considered that the New Agreements do not change the computation method for calculating such fees, and there is no present intention to reduce expense waiver and reimbursement arrangements that are currently in effect. Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Board determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management under the New Management Agreement and to each of the Sub-Advisers under the New Sub-Advisory Agreements was reasonable.
Profitability
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board received and considered information concerning the profitability of Funds Management, as well as the profitability of both WFAM and Wells Fargo from providing services to the fund family as a whole. The Board noted that Wells Capital’s profitability information with respect to providing services to each Fund Wells Capital sub-advises and other funds in the family was subsumed in the WFAM and Wells Fargo profitability analysis. The Board did not consider profitability with respect to AllianzGI U.S., as the sub-advisory fees paid to AllianzGI U.S. had been negotiated by Funds Management on an arm’s-length basis.
Funds Management reported on the methodologies and estimates used in calculating profitability in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, including a description of the methodology used to allocate certain expenses. Among other things, the Board noted that the levels of profitability reported on a fund-by-fund basis varied widely, depending on factors such as the size, type and age of fund.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board received certain information about NewCo’s projected financial condition, and reviewed with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR and Reverence Capital the underlying assumptions on which such information was based. The Board considered that NewCo is a newly formed entity, with no historical

100  |  Multi-Asset Funds


Board considerations (unaudited)
operations, revenues or expenses, and that it is difficult to predict with any degree of certainty the future profitability of NewCo and the Advisers from advisory activities under the New Agreements. The Board considered that the fee rates payable under the New Agreements will not increase as a result of the Transaction as compared to the rates under the Current Agreements, and that the current contractual expense limitations applicable to each Fund will not increase. The Board noted that if the New Agreements are approved by shareholders and the Transaction closes, the Board will have the opportunity in the future to review the profitability of NewCo and the Advisers from advisory activities under the New Agreements.
Economies of scale
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board received and considered information about the potential for Funds Management to experience economies of scale in the provision of management services to the Funds, the difficulties of calculating economies of scale at an individual fund level, and the extent to which potential scale benefits are shared with Fund shareholders. The Board noted the existence of breakpoints in each Fund’s management fee structure, which operate generally to reduce the Fund’s expense ratios as the Fund grows in size, and the size of the Fund in relation to such breakpoints. The Board considered that, in addition to management fee breakpoints, Funds Management shares potential economies of scale from its management business in a variety of ways, including through fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangements, competitive management fee rates set at the outset without regard to breakpoints, and investments in the business intended to enhance services available to shareholders.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board noted that NewCo and the Advisers may benefit from possible growth of the Funds resulting from enhanced distribution capabilities. However, the Board noted that other factors could also affect the potential for economies of scale, and that it was not possible to quantify any potential future economies of scale. Based upon the information furnished to the Board in connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process and the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board concluded that Funds Management’s arrangements with respect to each Fund, including contractual breakpoints and expense limitation arrangements, constituted a reasonable approach to sharing potential economies of scale with the Fund and its shareholders.
“Fall-out” benefits to Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board received and considered information regarding potential “fall-out” or ancillary benefits received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including Wells Capital, and AllianzGI U.S. as a result of their relationships with the Funds. Ancillary benefits could include, among others, benefits directly attributable to other relationships with the Funds and benefits potentially derived from an increase in Funds Management’s and the Sub-Advisers’ business as a result of their relationships with the Funds. The Board noted that various current affiliates of Funds Management may receive distribution-related fees, shareholder servicing payments and sub-transfer agency fees in respect of shares sold or held through them and services provided.
In connection with the 2021 Annual Approval Process, the Board also reviewed information about soft dollar credits earned and utilized by the Sub-Advisers, fees earned by Funds Management and Wells Capital from managing a private investment vehicle for the fund family’s securities lending collateral, and commissions earned by an affiliated broker of Wells Fargo from portfolio transactions.
In connection with the New Agreement Approval Process, the Board received information to the effect that the Transaction is not expected to have a material impact on the fall-out benefits currently realized by Funds Management and its affiliates, including Wells Capital, and AllianzGI U.S. The information reviewed by the Board also noted that several of the ancillary benefits identified for WFAM would be potential ancillary benefits for NewCo, including that the scale and reputation of the Funds might benefit NewCo’s broader reputation, product initiatives, technology investment and talent acquisition. Based on its consideration of the factors and information it deemed relevant, including those described here, the Board did not find that any ancillary benefits expected to be received by Funds Management and its affiliates, including NewCo and Wells Capital, and AllianzGI U.S. under the New Agreements were unreasonable.
Conclusion
At the Board Meeting, after considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Board unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and to each of the Sub-Advisers under the New Agreements is reasonable, approved the New Agreements for a two-year term, and voted to recommend that Fund shareholders approve the New Agreements.

Multi-Asset Funds  |  101


Board considerations (unaudited)
Board Considerations - Interim Agreements
At a meeting held on May 17-19, 2021 (the “Board Meeting”), the Boards of Trustees (each, a “Board”, and collectively, the “Boards”) of Wells Fargo Funds Trust, Wells Fargo Master Trust, Wells Fargo Variable Trust, Wells Fargo Global Dividend Opportunity Fund, Wells Fargo Income Opportunities Fund, Wells Fargo Multi-Sector Income Fund and Wells Fargo Utilities and High Income Fund (each a “Trust”, and the series thereof, a “Fund”) reviewed and approved for the Trusts and Funds, as applicable: (i) interim investment management agreements (the “Interim Management Agreements”) with Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (“Funds Management”); (ii) interim investment advisory agreements (the “Interim Advisory Agreements”) with Funds Management; and (iii) interim sub-advisory agreements (the “Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements”) with each of Cooke & Bieler, L.P., Galliard Capital Management LLC (“Galliard”), Peregrine Capital Management Inc., Wells Capital Management LLC (“WellsCap”), and Wells Fargo Asset Management (International) Limited (“WFAMI”, and collectively, the “Sub-Advisers”). Each Trustee on the Board is not an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) of the Funds (collectively, the “Independent Trustees”). The Interim Management Agreements, Interim Advisory Agreements, and Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements are collectively referred to as the “Interim Advisory Agreements.”
At the Board Meeting, the Boards reviewed and approved the continuation of existing investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements (the “Current Advisory Agreements”) for each Trust and Fund, as applicable. The factors considered and conclusions reached by the Boards in approving the Current Advisory Agreements are summarized in the section entitled “Board Considerations – Current Agreements” of this shareholder report. The Boards noted that Wells Fargo & Company has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management (“WFAM”), which includes Funds Management, Galliard, WellsCap and WFAMI (the “Affiliated Sub-Advisers”), to a holding company affiliated with private funds of GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. (the “Transaction”). The Boards further noted that the Transaction would result in a change-of-control of Funds Management and the Affiliated Sub-Advisers, which would be considered to be an “assignment” under the 1940 Act that would terminate the Current Advisory Agreements. At the Board Meeting, the Boards also reviewed and approved new investment management, advisory and sub-advisory agreements (the “New Advisory Agreements”) for each Trust and Fund, as applicable, that would replace the Current Advisory Agreements upon consummation of the Transaction, subject to approval of the New Advisory Agreements by the applicable Trust’s or Fund’s shareholders. The factors considered and conclusions reached by the Boards in approving the New Advisory Agreements are summarized in the section entitled “Board Considerations – New Agreements” of this shareholder report.
At the Board Meeting, the Boards also approved the Interim Advisory Agreements, which will go into effect for a Trust or Fund only in the event that shareholders of such Trust or Fund do not approve the New Advisory Agreement(s) for the Trust or Fund by the closing date of the Transaction, when the Current Advisory Agreements will terminate. The Board noted that, in such a circumstance, the Interim Advisory Agreements will permit continuity of management by allowing Funds Management and the Sub-Advisers to continue providing services to the Trust or Fund pursuant to the Interim Advisory Agreements while the Trust or Fund continues to solicit shareholder approval of such New Advisory Agreement(s). The Boards noted that the terms of the Interim Advisory Agreements are identical to those of the Current Advisory Agreements, except for the term and the addition of escrow provisions with respect to the advisory fees. The Boards also noted that the entities that would service the Funds and Trusts under the Interim Advisory Agreements are identical to those that provide services under the Current Advisory Agreements and those that will provide services under the New Advisory Agreements.
In approving the Interim Advisory Agreements, the Boards considered the same factors and reached the same conclusions as they considered and reached with respect to the Boards’ approvals of the Current Advisory Agreements and New Advisory Agreements, as applicable, which are described in separate Board Consideration sections within this shareholder report. Prior to the Board Meeting, including at a series of meetings held in April and May 2021, the Trustees conferred extensively among themselves and with senior representatives of Funds Management, GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital Partners, L.P. about the Interim Advisory Agreements and related matters. The Independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Interim Advisory Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately.
At the Board Meeting, after considering the factors and reaching the conclusions described in the separate Board Consideration sections within this shareholder report, the Boards unanimously determined that the compensation payable to Funds Management and to each Sub-Adviser under each of the Interim Advisory Agreements was reasonable, and approved the Interim Advisory Agreements.

102  |  Multi-Asset Funds




For more information
More information about Wells Fargo Funds is available free upon request. To obtain literature, please write, visit the Funds' website, or call:
Wells Fargo Funds
P.O. Box 219967
Kansas City, MO 64121-9967
Website: wfam.com
Individual investors: 1-800-222-8222
Retail investment professionals: 1-888-877-9275
Institutional investment professionals: 1-866-765-0778
This report and the financial statements contained herein are submitted for the general information of the shareholders of the Wells Fargo Funds. If this report is used for promotional purposes, distribution of the report must be accompanied or preceded by a current prospectus. Before investing, please consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of the investment. For a current prospectus and, if available, a summary prospectus, containing this information, call 1-800-222-8222 or visit the Funds' website at wfam.com. Read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money.
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) is the trade name for certain investment advisory/management firms owned by Wells Fargo & Company. These firms include but are not limited to Wells Capital Management Incorporated and Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC. Certain products managed by WFAM entities are distributed by Wells Fargo Funds Distributor, LLC (a broker-dealer and Member FINRA).
This material is for general informational and educational purposes only and is NOT intended to provide investment advice or a recommendation of any kind - including a recommendation for any specific investment, strategy, or plan.
 INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED  ■  NO BANK GUARANTEE  ■  MAY LOSE VALUE 
© 2021 Wells Fargo & Company. All rights reserved.
PAR-0621-00773 07-21
AWBP/AR102 05-21


ITEM 2. CODE OF ETHICS

(a) As of the end of the period covered by the report, Wells Fargo Funds Trust has adopted a code of ethics that applies to its President and Treasurer. A copy of the code of ethics is filed as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR.

(c) During the period covered by this report, there were no amendments to the provisions of the code of ethics adopted in Item 2(a) above.

(d) During the period covered by this report, there were no implicit or explicit waivers to the provisions of the code of ethics adopted in Item 2(a) above.

ITEM 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

The Board of Trustees of Wells Fargo Funds Trust has determined that Judith Johnson is an audit committee financial expert, as defined in Item 3 of Form N-CSR. Mrs. Johnson is independent for purposes of Item 3 of Form N-CSR.

ITEM 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

(a), (b), (c), (d) The following table presents aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for services rendered to the Registrant by the Registrant’s principal accountant. These fees were billed to the registrant and were approved by the Registrant’s audit committee.

 

     Fiscal
year ended
May 31, 2021
     Fiscal
year ended
May 31, 2020
 

Audit fees

   $ 372,740      $ 367,170  

Audit-related fees

     —          —    

Tax fees (1)

     72,790        69,270  

All other fees

     —          —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 445,530      $ 436,440  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) 

Tax fees consist of fees for tax compliance, tax advice, tax planning and excise tax.

(e) The Chair of the Audit Committees is authorized to pre-approve: (1) audit services for the mutual funds of Wells Fargo Funds Trust; (2) non-audit tax or compliance consulting or training services provided to the Funds by the independent auditors (“Auditors”) if the fees for any particular engagement are not anticipated to exceed $50,000; and (3) non-audit tax or compliance consulting or training services provided by the Auditors to a Fund’s investment adviser and its controlling entities (where pre-approval is required because the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Fund) if the fee to the Auditors for any particular engagement is not anticipated to exceed $50,000. For any such pre-approval sought from the Chair, Management shall prepare a brief description of the proposed services.

If the Chair approves of such service, he or she shall sign the statement prepared by Management.

Such written statement shall be presented to the full Committees at their next regularly scheduled meetings.


(f) Not applicable

(g) Not applicable    

(h) Not applicable

ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 6. INVESTMENTS

A Portfolio of Investments for each series of Wells Fargo Funds Trust is included as part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1 of this Form.

ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Not applicable.

ITEM 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Not applicable.

ITEM 9. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

Not applicable.

ITEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrant’s Board of Trustees that have been implemented since the registrant’s last provided disclosure in response to the requirements of this Item.

ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) The President and Treasurer have concluded that the Wells Fargo Funds Trust disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) provide reasonable assurances that material information relating to the registrant is made known to them by the appropriate persons based on their evaluation of these controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing of this report.

(b) There were no significant changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) that occurred during the most recent fiscal half-year of the period covered by this report that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


ITEM 12. DISCLOSURES OF SECURITIES LENDING ACTIVITES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Not applicable.

ITEM  13. EXHIBITS

(a)(1) Code of Ethics.

(a)(2) Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(b) Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


LOGO

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

Wells Fargo Funds Trust
By:  
  /s/ Andrew Owen
  Andrew Owen
  President
Date:   July 28, 2021

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.

 

Wells Fargo Funds Trust
By:  
  /s/ Andrew Owen
  Andrew Owen
  President
Date:   July 28, 2021
By:  
  /s/ Jeremy DePalma
  Jeremy DePalma
  Treasurer
Date:   July 28, 2021