COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

NOTE 11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES 

On April 12, 2013 a complaint (Complaint) was filed in the U.S. District Court Southern District of the State of new York against the Company, the Company’s Chairman and Does 1-50 by Star city Capital, LLC (“Plaintiff”) alleging securities fraud, common law fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duties and breach of contract in connection with the issuance of . The Plaintiff is also request declaratory relief from the Court.

The action arises from the issuance and subsequent cancellation of 103,030,303 of the company’s common shares in satisfaction of $17,000 of convertible indebtedness of the Company held by the Plaintiff . The Plaintiff alleges that a cancellation notice sent by them to the Company’s transfer agent was meant to instruct the Transfer Agent simply to cancel the physical certificate in order that an equivalent number of shares may be transferred via DWAC to the Plaintiff’s stockbroker for the benefit of the Plaintiff. DWAC is the acronym for Deposit/Withdrawal At Custodian. The DWAC transaction system run by The Depository Trust Company (a.k.a. DTC or CEDE & CO) permits brokers and custodial banks, the DTC participants, to request the movement of shares

to or from the issuer’s transfer agent electronically. A DWAC results in the crediting or debiting of shares to or from DTC’s book-entry account on the records of the issuer maintained by the transfer agent.

The Company believes that the cancellation notice sent by the Plaintiff clearly represents a cancellation of the conversion notice itself.

The convertible indebtedness held by the Plaintiff is convertible at Holder’s demand into the common shares of the Company’s stock at a conversion price per share equal to 55% (the “Discount”) of the lowest closing bid price for the Company’s common stock during the 5 trading days immediately preceding a conversion date, as reported by Bloomberg (the “Closing Bid Price”); provided that if the closing bid price for the common stock on the date in which the conversion shares are deposited into Holder’s brokerage account and confirmation has been received that Holder may execute trades of the conversion shares ( Clearing Date) is lower than the Closing Bid Price, then the purchase price for the conversion shares would be adjusted such that the Discount shall be taken from the closing bid price on the Clearing Date, and the Company shall issue additional shares to Purchaser to reflect such adjusted Purchase Price(“Reset”). The Company and the Plaintiff had agreed on a limitation on conversion equal to 9.99% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. There can be no assurance that a subsequent conversion notice for the same amount of indebtedness issued by the Plaintiff would convert into 103,030,303 of the company’s common shares.

The Plaintiff demands compensatory relief according to proof as well as exemplary and punitive damages. In accordance with GAAP, the Company records a liability when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount is reasonably estimable. There is significant judgment required in both the probability determination and as to whether an exposure can be reasonably estimated. In management’s opinion, the Company does not have a potential liability related to the current legal proceedings that would materially adversely affect its financial condition or operating results. However, the outcomes of legal proceedings and claims brought against the Company are subject to significant uncertainty. Should the Company fail to prevail or should the proceeding be resolved against the Company in the same reporting period, the operating results of a particular reporting period could be materially adversely affected.