SUBSEQUENT EVENTS	3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2013
Subsequent Events [Abstract]
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS	NOTE 14. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS On April 2 , 2013 the Company issued 100,000,000 Common Shares issued in satisfaction of $50,000 of outstanding indebtedness. On April 12, 2013 a complaint (Complaint) was filed in the U.S. District Court Southern District of the State of new York against the Company, the Company’s Chairman and Does 1-50 by Star city Capital, LLC (“Plaintiff”) alleging securities fraud, common law fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duties and breach of contract in connection with the issuance of . The Plaintiff is also request declaratory relief from the Court. The action arises from the issuance and subsequent cancellation of 103,030,303 of the company’s common shares in satisfaction of $17,000 of convertible indebtedness of the Company held by the Plaintiff . The Plaintiff alleges that a cancellation notice sent by them to the Company’s transfer agent was meant to instruct the Transfer Agent simply to cancel the physical certificate in order that an equivalent number of shares may be transferred via DWAC to the Plaintiff’s stockbroker for the benefit of the Plaintiff. DWAC is the acronym for Deposit/Withdrawal At Custodian. The DWAC transaction system run by The Depository Trust Company (a.k.a. DTC or CEDE & CO) permits brokers and custodial banks, the DTC participants, to request the movement of shares to or from the issuer’s transfer agent electronically. A DWAC results in the crediting or debiting of shares to or from DTC’s book-entry account on the records of the issuer maintained by the transfer agent. The Company believes that the cancellation notice sent by the Plaintiff clearly represents a cancellation of the conversion notice itself. The convertible indebtedness held by the Plaintiff is convertible at Holder’s demand into the common shares of the Company’s stock at a conversion price per share equal to 55% (the “Discount”) of the lowest closing bid price for the Company’s common stock during the 5 trading days immediately preceding a conversion date, as reported by Bloomberg (the “Closing Bid Price”); provided that if the closing bid price for the common stock on the date in which the conversion shares are deposited into Holder’s brokerage account and confirmation has been received that Holder may execute trades of the conversion shares ( Clearing Date) is lower than the Closing Bid Price, then the purchase price for the conversion shares would be adjusted such that the Discount shall be taken from the closing bid price on the Clearing Date, and the Company shall issue additional shares to Purchaser to reflect such adjusted Purchase Price(“Reset”). The Company and the Plaintiff had agreed on a limitation on conversion equal to 9.99% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. There can be no assurance that a subsequent conversion notice for the same amount of indebtedness issued by the Plaintiff would convert into 103,030,303 of the company’s common shares Although the Company believes this legal action has no merit, it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of this legal action

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2013

NOTE 14. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On April 2 , 2013 the Company issued 100,000,000 Common Shares issued in satisfaction of $50,000 of outstanding indebtedness.

On April 12, 2013 a complaint (Complaint) was filed in the U.S. District Court Southern District of the State of new York against the Company, the Company’s Chairman and Does 1-50 by Star city Capital, LLC (“Plaintiff”) alleging securities fraud, common law fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duties and breach of contract in connection with the issuance of . The Plaintiff is also request declaratory relief from the Court.

The action arises from the issuance and subsequent cancellation of 103,030,303 of the company’s common shares in satisfaction of $17,000 of convertible indebtedness of the Company held by the Plaintiff . The Plaintiff alleges that a cancellation notice sent by them to the Company’s transfer agent was meant to instruct the Transfer Agent simply to cancel the physical certificate in order that an equivalent number of shares may be transferred via DWAC to the Plaintiff’s stockbroker for the benefit of the Plaintiff. DWAC is the acronym for Deposit/Withdrawal At Custodian. The DWAC transaction system run by The Depository Trust Company (a.k.a. DTC or CEDE & CO) permits brokers and custodial banks, the DTC participants, to request the movement of shares

to or from the issuer’s transfer agent electronically. A DWAC results in the crediting or debiting of shares to or from DTC’s book-entry account on the records of the issuer maintained by the transfer agent.

The Company believes that the cancellation notice sent by the Plaintiff clearly represents a cancellation of the conversion notice itself.

The convertible indebtedness held by the Plaintiff is convertible at Holder’s demand into the common shares of the Company’s stock at a conversion price per share equal to 55% (the “Discount”) of the lowest closing bid price for the Company’s common stock during the 5 trading days immediately preceding a conversion date, as reported by Bloomberg (the “Closing Bid Price”); provided that if the closing bid price for the common stock on the date in which the conversion shares are deposited into Holder’s brokerage account and confirmation has been received that Holder may execute trades of the conversion shares ( Clearing Date) is lower than the Closing Bid Price, then the purchase price for the conversion shares would be adjusted such that the Discount shall be taken from the closing bid price on the Clearing Date, and the Company shall issue additional shares to Purchaser to reflect such adjusted Purchase Price(“Reset”). The Company and the Plaintiff had agreed on a limitation on conversion equal to 9.99% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. There can be no assurance that a subsequent conversion notice for the same amount of indebtedness issued by the Plaintiff would convert into 103,030,303 of the company’s common shares

Although the Company believes this legal action has no merit, it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of this legal action