XML 47 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2014
Regulated Operations [Abstract]  
REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT
Regulatory Environment

Wisconsin

2015 Rate Case

In April 2014, we filed an application with the PSCW to increase retail electric rates $76.8 million and to decrease natural gas rates $1.6 million, with rates expected to be effective January 1, 2015. Our request reflects a 10.60% return on common equity and a target common equity ratio of 50.51% in our regulatory capital structure. In May 2014, we filed our proposed electric and natural gas rate designs with the PSCW. These rate designs include significantly higher fixed charges, which better matches the related fixed costs of providing service. The PSCW is reviewing the new rate design as part of the rate-setting process.

The proposed retail electric rate increase is primarily driven by the completion of a partial refund to customers of the 2013 fuel cost over-collections in 2014 rates, which kept rates flat in 2014, as well as a reduction in refunds associated with decoupling. In 2015, fuel and purchased power costs are expected to increase, as are transmission costs and general inflation. The proposed retail electric rate increase also includes our request to recover deferred costs over four years related to the 2013 acquisition of the Fox Energy Center. Finally, capital costs associated with both previously approved environmental upgrades at the Columbia plant as well as our efforts to improve electric reliability by converting historically low performance overhead distribution lines to underground are also contributing to the requested increase in retail electric rates. The requested increase in retail electric rates was partially offset by the refund of a portion of the remaining 2013 fuel cost over-collections to customers. However, in July 2014, the PSCW authorized us to refund the remaining 2013 fuel cost over-collections to customers, all in 2014 rates, which differed from the original application to refund them in 2015 and 2016 rates.

The proposed retail natural gas rate decrease is being driven by 2013 decoupling over-collections, which will be refunded to customers in 2015. An increase in non-fuel operating and maintenance costs, including the impact of general inflation, and an increase in return on equity partially offset the effect of the 2013 decoupling over-collections.

In August 2014, the PSCW staff submitted testimony and recommended a rate increase of $28.7 million for retail electric and a rate decrease of $13.6 million for retail natural gas, which reflected a 10.20% return on common equity. PSCW staff recommended a common equity ratio of 50.27% for our regulatory capital structure. The PSCW held both technical and public hearings in September 2014. In October 2014, we issued an initial brief revising our requested retail electric rate increase to approximately $48 million. The requested retail natural gas rate decrease was also revised to a decrease of approximately $8 million. The revised request is lower than the initial application and is primarily driven by certain PSCW staff adjustments, but does not include adjustments for the contested issues of incentive compensation and the customer billing system project. The revised request reflects a 10.20% return on common equity and a common equity ratio of 50.27% in our regulatory capital structure. A final decision by the PSCW on the 2015 rates is expected before December 31, 2014.

2014 Rates

In December 2013, the PSCW issued a final written order, effective January 1, 2014. It authorized a net retail electric rate decrease of $12.8 million and a net retail natural gas rate increase of $4.0 million, reflecting a 10.20% return on common equity. The order also included a common equity ratio of 50.14% in our regulatory capital structure. The retail electric rate impact consisted of a rate increase, including recovery of the difference between the 2012 fuel refund and the 2013 rate increase discussed below, entirely offset by a portion of estimated fuel cost over-collections from customers in 2013. Retail electric rates were further decreased by 2012 decoupling over-collections to be returned to customers in 2014. The retail natural gas rate impact consisted of a rate decrease, which was more than offset by the positive impact of 2012 decoupling under-collections to be recovered from customers in 2014. Both the retail electric and retail natural gas rate changes included the recovery of pension and other employee benefit increases that were deferred in the 2013 rate case, as discussed below. The PSCW also authorized the recovery of prudently incurred 2014 environmental mitigation project costs related to compliance with a Consent Decree signed in January 2013 related to the Pulliam and Weston sites. See Note 9, Commitments and Contingencies, for more information. Additionally, the order required us to terminate our decoupling mechanism, beginning January 1, 2014.

2013 Rates

In December 2012, the PSCW issued a final written order, effective January 1, 2013. The order included a $28.5 million retail electric rate increase, partially offset by the 2012 fuel refund of $20.5 million. The difference between the 2012 fuel refund and the rate increase was deferred for recovery in 2014 rates. As a result, there was no change to customers' 2013 retail electric rates. The order also included a $3.4 million retail natural gas rate decrease. The order reflected a 10.30% return on common equity and a common equity ratio of 51.61% in our regulatory capital structure. The rate changes included deferrals of $7.3 million for retail electric and $2.1 million for retail natural gas of pension and other employee benefit costs that are being recovered in 2014 rates. In addition, we were authorized recovery of $5.9 million related to income tax amounts previously expensed due to the Federal Health Care Reform Act. As a result, this amount was recorded as a regulatory asset in 2012, and recovery from customers began in 2013. The order also authorized the recovery of direct Cross State Air Pollution Rule costs incurred through the end of 2012. Lastly, the order authorized us to switch from production tax credits to Section 1603 Grants for the Crane Creek wind project.

A decoupling mechanism for natural gas and electric residential and small commercial and industrial customers was approved on a pilot basis as part of the order. The mechanism was based on total rate case-approved margins, rather than being calculated on a per-customer basis. The mechanism did not cover all customer classes, and it included an annual $14.0 million cap for electric service and an annual $8.0 million cap for natural gas service. Amounts recoverable from or refundable to customers are subject to these caps.

Michigan

2015 Rate Case

In October 2014, we filed an application with the MPSC to increase retail electric rates $5.7 million, with interim rates expected to be effective in April 2015. Our request reflects a 10.60% return on common equity and a target common equity ratio of 50.48% in our regulatory capital structure. The proposed retail electric rate increase is primarily driven by the 2013 acquisition of the Fox Energy Center as well as other capital investments associated with the Crane Creek wind farm and environmental upgrades at generating plants. Expenses are expected to increase for line clearance, customer relations, uncollectible expenses, injuries and damages, and general inflation. The proposal includes annual rate increases to be implemented over a three-year period.