XML 21 R2.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.23.1
Pay vs Performance Disclosure
11 Months Ended 12 Months Ended 25 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2022
Dec. 31, 2022
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2021
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2020
USD ($)
Jan. 31, 2022
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]          
Pay vs Performance [Table Text Block]  

PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE DISCLOSURE

As described in more detail in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the executive compensation program has been designed to provide a level of compensation that is strongly dependent upon the achievement of short-term and long-term goals that are aligned with the interests of WEC Energy Group’s and the Company’s stockholders and customers. As such, a substantial portion of pay will only be realized upon strong corporate performance. The Compensation Committee has not designed the compensation program to specifically align WEC Energy Group’s and the Company’s performance measures with “compensation actually paid” (“CAP”) (as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K) for a particular year. For example, several performance measures are utilized to align executive compensation with WEC Energy Group’s and the Company’s performance that are not presented in the Pay versus Performance table below.

 

The following tables and supplemental graphical and narrative information present information about CAP, as defined by Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, and compares CAP to various performance measures, also in accordance with such rules. CAP is a supplemental measure to be viewed alongside performance measures as an addition to the philosophy and strategy of compensation-setting discussed in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” and not in replacement thereof.

 

Year (1)
Summary Compensation
Table (SCT) Total for PEO
($)
(1,2)
Compensation Actually
Paid (CAP) to PEO
($)
(3)
Average
SCT total for
non-PEO
NEOs
($)
(2,3)
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid
to non-PEO
NEOs
($)
Value of Initial Fixed $100
investment based on:
($)
WEC Net
Income
($)
(in millions)
Company
Selected
Measure
Lauber Fletcher Lauber Fletcher (4)
WEC TSR
(5)
Peer Group
TSR
WEC Earnings
Per Share
(diluted)
($)
2022 8,149,461 8,151,511 9,721,228 17,332,947 2,729,967 3,457,990 110.80 111.03 1,408.1 4.45
2021 18,481,871 14,249,651 3,428,937 2,769,595 111.34 110.07 1,300.3 4.11
2020 18,136,171 15,590,856 2,871,392 3,298,800 102.49 95.94 1,199.9 3.79

 

(1)On February 1, 2022, Mr. Lauber succeeded Mr. Fletcher as CEO of WEC Energy Group and the Company.
(2)Represents the CAP to each of Messrs. Lauber and Fletcher, and the average CAP to the non-PEO NEOs as a group, each as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned or paid during the applicable fiscal years. To calculate the CAP to Messrs. Lauber and Fletcher, and the average CAP to our non-PEO NEOs, the following adjustments were made to the SCT total compensation for the applicable fiscal year:

 

SCT to CAP Reconciliation

Year SCT Total
($)
Deductions from SCT Total Additions to SCT Total CAP
($)
Change in
Pension
Value
($)
(a)
Equity-based
awards Grant
Date Fair
Value
($)
(b)
Pension
Benefit
Service
Costs
($)
(c)(i)
Change in Value of
Covered Fiscal Year
Awards Unvested at
Covered Fiscal
Year-End
($)
(c)(ii)
Change in Value
of Prior Years’
Awards
Unvested at
Fiscal Year-End
($)
(c)(iii)
Value of Awards
Granted and
Vested in
Covered Fiscal
Year
($)
(c)(iv)
Change in
Value of Prior
Years’ Awards
that Vested in
Fiscal Year
($)
Lauber SCT to CAP Reconciliation
2022 8,149,461 101,995 3,677,045 47,302 4,020,237 242,593 1,040,675 9,721,228
2021
2020
Fletcher SCT to CAP Reconciliation
2022 8,151,511 1,979,992 4,288,062 12,250,001 1,481,678 1,717,811 17,332,947
2021 18,481,871 11,056,456 3,241,666 8,455,950 3,723,169 (1,556,840) (556,377) 14,249,651
2020 18,136,171 11,037,728 3,109,135 7,556,108 3,386,570 633,130 25,740 15,590,856
Average Non-PEO NEOs SCT to CAP Reconciliation
2022 2,729,967 26,676 1,086,369 26,386 1,187,762 110,141 516,779 3,457,990
2021 3,428,937 62,687 1,427,674 32,115 1,640,022 (637,759) (203,359) 2,769,595
2020 2,871,392 91,293 1,237,573 35,602 1,325,526 365,710 29,436 3,298,800

 

(a) Represents the grant date fair value of equity awards as reflected in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns of the SCT.
(b) Represents the actuarially determined value of the pension benefit accrual for services rendered by each NEO during the applicable year. There were no costs of benefits granted pursuant to a plan amendment during any covered fiscal year that were attributed by the plan’s benefit formula to services rendered in periods prior to the plan amendment.
(c) Represents (i) the covered fiscal year-end value of any equity awards granted in the covered fiscal year that were outstanding and unvested as of the end of such year; (ii) the amount of the change as of the covered fiscal year-end (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value of any awards granted in prior years that were outstanding and unvested as of the end of the covered fiscal year; (iii) the fair value as of the vesting date of awards granted in a covered fiscal year that vested in the same covered fiscal year due to the retirement of a NEO; and (iv) the amount equal to the change as of the vesting date (from

 

  the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value for awards granted in prior years that vested during the covered fiscal year. The valuation assumptions used to calculate fair values did not materially differ from those disclosed at the time of grant.
(3) The non-PEO NEOs for each of the years shown were as follows:
  2022: Messrs. Garvin and Mastoris, and Mmes. Liu and Kelsey
  2021: Messrs. Lauber and Garvin, and Mmes. Liu and Kelsey
  2020: Messrs. Lauber, Garvin, and Metcalfe, and Mmes. Liu and Kelsey
(4) Assumes an investment of $100 at the beginning of the measurement period and reinvestment of all dividends. The “measurement period” for each covered fiscal year is the period from December 31, 2019 through the end of such covered fiscal year.
(5) Represents the Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) of the Custom Peer Index Group, weighted according to the respective companies’ stock market capitalization at the beginning of each period for which a return is indicated. The Compensation Committee determined that PG&E was no longer an appropriate peer comparison and approved its removal from, and the addition of Dominion Energy, Inc. to, the 2022 Custom Peer Index Group. Prior to these changes, the Custom Peer Index Group TSR would have been $115.80 for 2022. For information about the Custom Peer Index Group, including the changes made, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Long-Term Incentive Compensation”.
     
Company Selected Measure Name   Earnings Per Share(diluted)      
Named Executive Officers, Footnote [Text Block]   The non-PEO NEOs for each of the years shown were as follows:
  2022: Messrs. Garvin and Mastoris, and Mmes. Liu and Kelsey
  2021: Messrs. Lauber and Garvin, and Mmes. Liu and Kelsey
  2020: Messrs. Lauber, Garvin, and Metcalfe, and Mmes. Liu and Kelsey
     
Peer Group Issuers, Footnote [Text Block]   Represents the Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) of the Custom Peer Index Group, weighted according to the respective companies’ stock market capitalization at the beginning of each period for which a return is indicated. The Compensation Committee determined that PG&E was no longer an appropriate peer comparison and approved its removal from, and the addition of Dominion Energy, Inc. to, the 2022 Custom Peer Index Group. Prior to these changes, the Custom Peer Index Group TSR would have been $115.80 for 2022. For information about the Custom Peer Index Group, including the changes made, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Long-Term Incentive Compensation”.      
Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote [Text Block]   Represents the CAP to each of Messrs. Lauber and Fletcher, and the average CAP to the non-PEO NEOs as a group, each as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned or paid during the applicable fiscal years. To calculate the CAP to Messrs. Lauber and Fletcher, and the average CAP to our non-PEO NEOs, the following adjustments were made to the SCT total compensation for the applicable fiscal year:

SCT to CAP Reconciliation

Year SCT Total
($)
Deductions from SCT Total Additions to SCT Total CAP
($)
Change in
Pension
Value
($)
(a)
Equity-based
awards Grant
Date Fair
Value
($)
(b)
Pension
Benefit
Service
Costs
($)
(c)(i)
Change in Value of
Covered Fiscal Year
Awards Unvested at
Covered Fiscal
Year-End
($)
(c)(ii)
Change in Value
of Prior Years’
Awards
Unvested at
Fiscal Year-End
($)
(c)(iii)
Value of Awards
Granted and
Vested in
Covered Fiscal
Year
($)
(c)(iv)
Change in
Value of Prior
Years’ Awards
that Vested in
Fiscal Year
($)
Lauber SCT to CAP Reconciliation
2022 8,149,461 101,995 3,677,045 47,302 4,020,237 242,593 1,040,675 9,721,228
2021
2020
Fletcher SCT to CAP Reconciliation
2022 8,151,511 1,979,992 4,288,062 12,250,001 1,481,678 1,717,811 17,332,947
2021 18,481,871 11,056,456 3,241,666 8,455,950 3,723,169 (1,556,840) (556,377) 14,249,651
2020 18,136,171 11,037,728 3,109,135 7,556,108 3,386,570 633,130 25,740 15,590,856
Average Non-PEO NEOs SCT to CAP Reconciliation
2022 2,729,967 26,676 1,086,369 26,386 1,187,762 110,141 516,779 3,457,990
2021 3,428,937 62,687 1,427,674 32,115 1,640,022 (637,759) (203,359) 2,769,595
2020 2,871,392 91,293 1,237,573 35,602 1,325,526 365,710 29,436 3,298,800

 

(a) Represents the grant date fair value of equity awards as reflected in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns of the SCT.
(b) Represents the actuarially determined value of the pension benefit accrual for services rendered by each NEO during the applicable year. There were no costs of benefits granted pursuant to a plan amendment during any covered fiscal year that were attributed by the plan’s benefit formula to services rendered in periods prior to the plan amendment.
(c) Represents (i) the covered fiscal year-end value of any equity awards granted in the covered fiscal year that were outstanding and unvested as of the end of such year; (ii) the amount of the change as of the covered fiscal year-end (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value of any awards granted in prior years that were outstanding and unvested as of the end of the covered fiscal year; (iii) the fair value as of the vesting date of awards granted in a covered fiscal year that vested in the same covered fiscal year due to the retirement of a NEO; and (iv) the amount equal to the change as of the vesting date (from

 

 the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value for awards granted in prior years that vested during the covered fiscal year. The valuation assumptions used to calculate fair values did not materially differ from those disclosed at the time of grant.
     
Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount [1]   $ 2,729,967 $ 3,428,937 $ 2,871,392  
Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount [1],[2]   $ 3,457,990 2,769,595 3,298,800  
Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote [Text Block]   Represents the CAP to each of Messrs. Lauber and Fletcher, and the average CAP to the non-PEO NEOs as a group, each as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned or paid during the applicable fiscal years. To calculate the CAP to Messrs. Lauber and Fletcher, and the average CAP to our non-PEO NEOs, the following adjustments were made to the SCT total compensation for the applicable fiscal year:

SCT to CAP Reconciliation

Year SCT Total
($)
Deductions from SCT Total Additions to SCT Total CAP
($)
Change in
Pension
Value
($)
(a)
Equity-based
awards Grant
Date Fair
Value
($)
(b)
Pension
Benefit
Service
Costs
($)
(c)(i)
Change in Value of
Covered Fiscal Year
Awards Unvested at
Covered Fiscal
Year-End
($)
(c)(ii)
Change in Value
of Prior Years’
Awards
Unvested at
Fiscal Year-End
($)
(c)(iii)
Value of Awards
Granted and
Vested in
Covered Fiscal
Year
($)
(c)(iv)
Change in
Value of Prior
Years’ Awards
that Vested in
Fiscal Year
($)
Lauber SCT to CAP Reconciliation
2022 8,149,461 101,995 3,677,045 47,302 4,020,237 242,593 1,040,675 9,721,228
2021
2020
Fletcher SCT to CAP Reconciliation
2022 8,151,511 1,979,992 4,288,062 12,250,001 1,481,678 1,717,811 17,332,947
2021 18,481,871 11,056,456 3,241,666 8,455,950 3,723,169 (1,556,840) (556,377) 14,249,651
2020 18,136,171 11,037,728 3,109,135 7,556,108 3,386,570 633,130 25,740 15,590,856
Average Non-PEO NEOs SCT to CAP Reconciliation
2022 2,729,967 26,676 1,086,369 26,386 1,187,762 110,141 516,779 3,457,990
2021 3,428,937 62,687 1,427,674 32,115 1,640,022 (637,759) (203,359) 2,769,595
2020 2,871,392 91,293 1,237,573 35,602 1,325,526 365,710 29,436 3,298,800

 

(a) Represents the grant date fair value of equity awards as reflected in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns of the SCT.
(b) Represents the actuarially determined value of the pension benefit accrual for services rendered by each NEO during the applicable year. There were no costs of benefits granted pursuant to a plan amendment during any covered fiscal year that were attributed by the plan’s benefit formula to services rendered in periods prior to the plan amendment.
(c) Represents (i) the covered fiscal year-end value of any equity awards granted in the covered fiscal year that were outstanding and unvested as of the end of such year; (ii) the amount of the change as of the covered fiscal year-end (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value of any awards granted in prior years that were outstanding and unvested as of the end of the covered fiscal year; (iii) the fair value as of the vesting date of awards granted in a covered fiscal year that vested in the same covered fiscal year due to the retirement of a NEO; and (iv) the amount equal to the change as of the vesting date (from

 

 the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value for awards granted in prior years that vested during the covered fiscal year. The valuation assumptions used to calculate fair values did not materially differ from those disclosed at the time of grant.
     
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return [Text Block]  

CAP v. TSR

As demonstrated in the following graph, the amount of compensation paid to the PEOs and the average compensation paid to the other NEOs was aligned with WEC Energy Group’s TSR performance. A substantial portion of the compensation awarded to each of the NEOs is long-term incentive compensation. WEC Energy Group performance unit awards comprise 65% of the long-term incentive compensation granted each year, with vesting primarily based upon WEC Energy Group’s TSR performance against its peer group. As discussed further in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the performance units granted in 2020, which vested at the end of the three-year performance period ended December 31, 2022, provided a payout that was less than target. See the Five-Year Cumulative Return and Total Stockholder Returns graphs in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Executive Summary” for information on WEC Energy Group’s TSR performance over the 5- and 10-year periods ended December 31, 2022, which exceeded the performance of its peer group.

 

     
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income [Text Block]  

CAP v. WEC Net Income and Earnings Per Share (Company-Selected Measure)

As demonstrated by the following graphs, during the cumulative three-year period ended December 31, 2022, the compensation paid to the PEOs and the average compensation paid to the other NEOs was aligned with WEC Energy Group’s net income and EPS performance. Pursuant to the terms of WEC Energy Group’s short-term performance plan, almost 75% of the payout was based upon WEC Energy Group’s performance against EPS goals, of which net income is a key component. Almost 25% was based upon WEC Energy Group’s performance against cash flow goals. As discussed further in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” for 2022, the target level payout under WEC Energy Group’s short-term performance plan with respect to EPS was set at the high end of its long-term EPS growth goal, and the maximum payout was set above the long-term EPS growth goal. WEC Energy Group’s strong performance against the EPS and cash flow goals in 2022 resulted in maximum level payouts for each measure.

 

     
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure [Text Block]  

     
Tabular List [Table Text Block]  

Most Important Performance Measures

The following represents the most important financial performance measures used by WEC Energy Group and the Company to link compensation actually paid to each NEO for the most recently completed fiscal year to company performance:

 

WEC Earnings Per Share   WEC Net Income   WEC Cash Flow  

Return on Equity of
WEC Utilities

 

Achievement of WEC Energy Group’s goals with respect to the financial measures highlighted above should drive strong TSR performance for WEC Energy Group relative to its peers, which is an important component of the compensation program as more fully described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Long-Term Incentive Compensation”.

     
Total Shareholder Return Amount [3]   $ 110.8 111.34 102.49  
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount [4]   111.03 110.07 95.94  
Net Income (Loss)   $ 1,408,100,000 $ 1,300,300,000 $ 1,199,900,000  
Company Selected Measure Amount   4.45 4.11 3.79  
PEO Name Mr. Lauber       Mr. Fletcher
Measure [Axis]: 1          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]          
Measure Name   WEC Earnings Per Share      
Measure [Axis]: 2          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]          
Measure Name   WEC Net Income      
Measure [Axis]: 3          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]          
Measure Name   WEC Cash Flow      
Measure [Axis]: 4          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]          
Measure Name   Return on Equity ofWEC Utilities      
Lauber [Member]          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]          
PEO Total Compensation Amount [5]   $ 8,149,461      
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount [2],[5]   9,721,228      
Fletcher [Member]          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]          
PEO Total Compensation Amount [5]   8,151,511 $ 18,481,871 $ 18,136,171  
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount [2],[5]   17,332,947 14,249,651 15,590,856  
PEO [Member] | Lauber [Member] | Change in Pension Value [Member]          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]          
Adjustment to Compensation Amount   101,995      
PEO [Member] | Lauber [Member] | Equity-based Awards Grant Date Fair Value [Member]          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]          
Adjustment to Compensation Amount [6]   3,677,045      
PEO [Member] | Lauber [Member] | Pension Benefit Service Costs [Member]          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]          
Adjustment to Compensation Amount [7]   47,302      
PEO [Member] | Lauber [Member] | Change in Value of Covered Fiscal Year Unvested [Member]          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]          
Adjustment to Compensation Amount [8]   4,020,237      
PEO [Member] | Lauber [Member] | Change in Value of Prior Years Unvested [Member]          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]          
Adjustment to Compensation Amount [8]   242,593      
PEO [Member] | Lauber [Member] | Change in Value of Prior Years Vested [Member]          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]          
Adjustment to Compensation Amount [8]   1,040,675      
PEO [Member] | Fletcher [Member] | Change in Pension Value [Member]          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]          
Adjustment to Compensation Amount   1,979,992 11,056,456 11,037,728  
PEO [Member] | Fletcher [Member] | Equity-based Awards Grant Date Fair Value [Member]          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]          
Adjustment to Compensation Amount [6]   4,288,062 3,241,666 3,109,135  
PEO [Member] | Fletcher [Member] | Pension Benefit Service Costs [Member]          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]          
Adjustment to Compensation Amount [7]   12,250,001 8,455,950 7,556,108  
PEO [Member] | Fletcher [Member] | Change in Value of Covered Fiscal Year Unvested [Member]          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]          
Adjustment to Compensation Amount [8]     3,723,169 3,386,570  
PEO [Member] | Fletcher [Member] | Change in Value of Prior Years Unvested [Member]          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]          
Adjustment to Compensation Amount [8]     (1,556,840) 633,130  
PEO [Member] | Fletcher [Member] | Change in Value of Prior Years Vested [Member]          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]          
Adjustment to Compensation Amount [8]   1,717,811 (556,377) 25,740  
PEO [Member] | Fletcher [Member] | Value of Awards Granted and Vested in Covered Fiscal Year [Member]          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]          
Adjustment to Compensation Amount [8]   1,481,678      
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Change in Pension Value [Member]          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]          
Adjustment to Compensation Amount   26,676 62,687 91,293  
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Equity-based Awards Grant Date Fair Value [Member]          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]          
Adjustment to Compensation Amount [6]   1,086,369 1,427,674 1,237,573  
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Pension Benefit Service Costs [Member]          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]          
Adjustment to Compensation Amount [7]   26,386 32,115 35,602  
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Change in Value of Covered Fiscal Year Unvested [Member]          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]          
Adjustment to Compensation Amount [8]   1,187,762 1,640,022 1,325,526  
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Change in Value of Prior Years Unvested [Member]          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]          
Adjustment to Compensation Amount [8]   110,141 (637,759) 365,710  
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Change in Value of Prior Years Vested [Member]          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]          
Adjustment to Compensation Amount [8]   $ 516,779 $ (203,359) $ 29,436  
[1] The non-PEO NEOs for each of the years shown were as follows:
  2022: Messrs. Garvin and Mastoris, and Mmes. Liu and Kelsey
  2021: Messrs. Lauber and Garvin, and Mmes. Liu and Kelsey
  2020: Messrs. Lauber, Garvin, and Metcalfe, and Mmes. Liu and Kelsey
[2] Represents the CAP to each of Messrs. Lauber and Fletcher, and the average CAP to the non-PEO NEOs as a group, each as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned or paid during the applicable fiscal years. To calculate the CAP to Messrs. Lauber and Fletcher, and the average CAP to our non-PEO NEOs, the following adjustments were made to the SCT total compensation for the applicable fiscal year:

SCT to CAP Reconciliation

Year SCT Total
($)
Deductions from SCT Total Additions to SCT Total CAP
($)
Change in
Pension
Value
($)
(a)
Equity-based
awards Grant
Date Fair
Value
($)
(b)
Pension
Benefit
Service
Costs
($)
(c)(i)
Change in Value of
Covered Fiscal Year
Awards Unvested at
Covered Fiscal
Year-End
($)
(c)(ii)
Change in Value
of Prior Years’
Awards
Unvested at
Fiscal Year-End
($)
(c)(iii)
Value of Awards
Granted and
Vested in
Covered Fiscal
Year
($)
(c)(iv)
Change in
Value of Prior
Years’ Awards
that Vested in
Fiscal Year
($)
Lauber SCT to CAP Reconciliation
2022 8,149,461 101,995 3,677,045 47,302 4,020,237 242,593 1,040,675 9,721,228
2021
2020
Fletcher SCT to CAP Reconciliation
2022 8,151,511 1,979,992 4,288,062 12,250,001 1,481,678 1,717,811 17,332,947
2021 18,481,871 11,056,456 3,241,666 8,455,950 3,723,169 (1,556,840) (556,377) 14,249,651
2020 18,136,171 11,037,728 3,109,135 7,556,108 3,386,570 633,130 25,740 15,590,856
Average Non-PEO NEOs SCT to CAP Reconciliation
2022 2,729,967 26,676 1,086,369 26,386 1,187,762 110,141 516,779 3,457,990
2021 3,428,937 62,687 1,427,674 32,115 1,640,022 (637,759) (203,359) 2,769,595
2020 2,871,392 91,293 1,237,573 35,602 1,325,526 365,710 29,436 3,298,800

 

(a) Represents the grant date fair value of equity awards as reflected in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns of the SCT.
(b) Represents the actuarially determined value of the pension benefit accrual for services rendered by each NEO during the applicable year. There were no costs of benefits granted pursuant to a plan amendment during any covered fiscal year that were attributed by the plan’s benefit formula to services rendered in periods prior to the plan amendment.
(c) Represents (i) the covered fiscal year-end value of any equity awards granted in the covered fiscal year that were outstanding and unvested as of the end of such year; (ii) the amount of the change as of the covered fiscal year-end (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value of any awards granted in prior years that were outstanding and unvested as of the end of the covered fiscal year; (iii) the fair value as of the vesting date of awards granted in a covered fiscal year that vested in the same covered fiscal year due to the retirement of a NEO; and (iv) the amount equal to the change as of the vesting date (from

 

 the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value for awards granted in prior years that vested during the covered fiscal year. The valuation assumptions used to calculate fair values did not materially differ from those disclosed at the time of grant.
[3] Assumes an investment of $100 at the beginning of the measurement period and reinvestment of all dividends. The “measurement period” for each covered fiscal year is the period from December 31, 2019 through the end of such covered fiscal year.
[4] Represents the Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) of the Custom Peer Index Group, weighted according to the respective companies’ stock market capitalization at the beginning of each period for which a return is indicated. The Compensation Committee determined that PG&E was no longer an appropriate peer comparison and approved its removal from, and the addition of Dominion Energy, Inc. to, the 2022 Custom Peer Index Group. Prior to these changes, the Custom Peer Index Group TSR would have been $115.80 for 2022. For information about the Custom Peer Index Group, including the changes made, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Long-Term Incentive Compensation”.
[5] On February 1, 2022, Mr. Lauber succeeded Mr. Fletcher as CEO of WEC Energy Group and the Company.
[6] Represents the grant date fair value of equity awards as reflected in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns of the SCT.
[7] Represents the actuarially determined value of the pension benefit accrual for services rendered by each NEO during the applicable year. There were no costs of benefits granted pursuant to a plan amendment during any covered fiscal year that were attributed by the plan’s benefit formula to services rendered in periods prior to the plan amendment.
[8] (c)Represents (i) the covered fiscal year-end value of any equity awards granted in the covered fiscal year that were outstanding and unvested as of the end of such year; (ii) the amount of the change as of the covered fiscal year-end (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value of any awards granted in prior years that were outstanding and unvested as of the end of the covered fiscal year; (iii) the fair value as of the vesting date of awards granted in a covered fiscal year that vested in the same covered fiscal year due to the retirement of a NEO; and (iv) the amount equal to the change as of the vesting date (from  the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value for awards granted in prior years that vested during the covered fiscal year. The valuation assumptions used to calculate fair values did not materially differ from those disclosed at the time of grant.