XML 27 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.4.0.3
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
12 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the reliability of the inputs used to determine fair value. Level 1 refers to fair values determined based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. Level 2 refers to fair values estimated using significant other observable inputs, and Level 3 includes fair values estimated using significant non-observable inputs. The following tables present the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis using the fair value hierarchy at March 31, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands).
 
Fair Value Measurements at
 
March 31, 2016
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
ASSETS:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
210,711

 
$

 
$

 
$
210,711

U.S. government and municipal obligations
41,116

 
82,212

 

 
123,328

Commercial paper

 
16,172

 

 
16,172

Corporate bonds
1,864

 

 

 
1,864

Derivative financial instruments

 
191

 

 
191

Contingently returnable consideration

 


 
16,131

 
16,131

 
$
253,691


$
98,575


$
16,131


$
368,397

LIABILITIES:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contingent consideration
$

 
$

 
$
(7,293
)
 
$
(7,293
)
Derivative financial instruments

 
(158
)
 

 
(158
)
 
$

 
$
(158
)
 
$
(7,293
)
 
$
(7,451
)
 
 
Fair Value Measurements at
 
March 31, 2015
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
ASSETS:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
104,893

 
$

 
$

 
$
104,893

U.S. government and municipal obligations
46,564

 
98,781

 

 
145,345

Commercial paper

 
5,095

 

 
5,095

Corporate bonds
9,524

 

 

 
9,524

Derivative financial instruments

 
15

 

 
15

 
$
160,981

 
$
103,891

 
$

 
$
264,872

LIABILITIES:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contingent consideration
$

 
$

 
$
(4,484
)
 
$
(4,484
)
Derivative financial instruments

 
(1,664
)
 

 
(1,664
)
 
$

 
$
(1,664
)
 
$
(4,484
)
 
$
(6,148
)

 
This hierarchy requires the Company to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. On a recurring basis, the Company measures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value, including marketable securities and derivative financial instruments.
The Company’s Level 1 investments are classified as such because they are valued using quoted market prices or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency.
The Company’s Level 2 investments are classified as such because fair value is being calculated using data from similar but not identical sources, or a discounted cash flow model using the contractual interest rate as compared to the underlying interest yield curve. The Company's derivative financial instruments consist of forward foreign exchange contracts and are classified as Level 2 because the fair values of these derivatives are determined using models based on market observable inputs, including spot prices for foreign currencies and credit derivatives, as well as an interest rate factor. The Company classifies municipal obligations as level 2 because the fair values are determined using quoted prices from markets the Company considers to be inactive. Commercial paper is classified as Level 2 because the Company uses market information from similar but not identical instruments and discounted cash flow models based on interest rate yield curves to determine fair value. For further information on the Company's derivative instruments refer to Note 9.
The Company's Level 3 asset and liabilities consist of contingently returnable consideration and contingent purchase consideration, respectively. The Company's contingently returnable consideration represents a contingent right of return from Danaher to reimburse NetScout for cash awards to be paid by NetScout to employees of the Communications Business transferred to Newco (as defined below) for post-combination services on various dates through August 4, 2016 as part of the Transaction. The contingently returnable consideration is classified as Level 3 because the fair value of the asset was determined using assumptions developed by management in determining the estimated cash awards expected to be paid through August 4, 2016 after applying an assumed forfeiture rate. The contingently returnable consideration of $16.1 million, net of taxes as of March 31, 2016 is included as prepaid expenses and other current assets in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, certain post-combination cash retention payments have been disbursed. Danaher will reimburse the Company for those costs and NetScout will reimburse Danaher for the Company's estimated tax benefit. Because the right of offset has not been met, the Company recorded the gross amount of compensation as contingently returnable consideration and the tax benefit of $2.7 million as contingent purchase consideration. For additional information, see Note 7 of the Company's Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities for the year ended March 31, 2016 (in thousands):
 
Contingent
Purchase
Consideration
 
Contingently Returnable Consideration
Balance at March 31, 2015
$
(4,484
)
 
$

(Increase) / decrease in fair value and accretion expense (included within research and development expense)
(152
)
 

Contingently returnable consideration

 
19,125

Increase in fair value
(21
)
 
3,676

Gross presentation of contingently returnable consideration to contingent purchase consideration
(2,636
)
 
2,636

Payments received

 
(9,306
)
Balance at March 31, 2016
$
(7,293
)
 
$
16,131


 
 Deal-related compensation expense and accretion charges related to the contingent consideration for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 was $152 thousand and was included as part of earnings.
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities for the year ended March 31, 2015 (in thousands):
 
Contingent
Purchase
Consideration
 
Contingent
Contractual
Non-compliance
Liability
Balance at March 31, 2014
$
(4,291
)
 
$
(49
)
(Increase) / decrease in fair value and accretion expense (included within research and development expense)
(193
)
 
49

Balance at March 31, 2015
$
(4,484
)
 
$
0


The Company had updated the probabilities used in the fair value calculation of the contingent liabilities at March 31, 2015, which reduced the liability by $9 thousand and is included as part of earnings for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015. Key assumptions include a 3.3% discount rate, and a percent weighted-probability of the settlement of the contingent contractual non-compliance liability. Deal related compensation expense, accretion charges and changes related to settlements of contractual non-compliance liabilities for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 was $153 thousand and was included as part of earnings.