XML 29 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.22.0.1
Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2021
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements
Estimates of fair value for financial assets and liabilities are based on the framework established in the accounting guidance for fair value measurements. The framework defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair value and requires certain disclosures. The framework discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow) and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The framework utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:
Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions.
Financial assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Thus, assets and liabilities categorized as Level 3 may be measured at fair value using inputs that are observable (Levels 1 and 2) and unobservable (Level 3). Management’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.
Financial Instruments
The carrying values of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short duration of these financial instruments.
The following table summarizes the fair value measurement of the Company’s long-term debt:
December 31, 2021
(In thousands)Carrying AmountFair ValueFair Value Hierarchy
Term Loan$650,000 $650,813 Level 2
2026 Unsecured Notes375,000 390,938 Level 2
Finance lease liabilities3,005 3,005 Level 3
Notes payable602 602 Level 3
Total debt$1,028,607 $1,045,358 
December 31, 2020
(In thousands)Carrying AmountFair ValueFair Value Hierarchy
Term Loan$772,000 $758,490 Level 2
2026 Unsecured Notes375,000 402,638 Level 2
Finance lease liabilities9,182 9,182 Level 3
Notes payable4,373 4,373 Level 3
Total debt$1,160,555 $1,174,683 
The estimated fair value of the Company’s Term Loan and 2026 Unsecured Notes is based on a relative value analysis performed as of December 31, 2021 and 2020. The finance lease liabilities and notes payable are fixed-rate debt, are not traded and do not have observable market inputs, therefore, the fair value is estimated to be equal to the carrying value.
The Company’s Interest Rate Cap with a notional amount of $650 million entered into for a cash payment of $3.1 million expired on December 31, 2020. During the life of the agreement, the Company used Level 2 inputs to adjust the carrying value of the Interest Rate Cap to estimated fair value quarterly based upon observable market-based inputs that reflected the present values of the difference between estimated future fixed rate payments and future variable receipts. The fair value of the Company’s Interest Rate Cap was zero as of December 31, 2020.
Business Combinations and Long-lived Assets
In connection with business combinations, the Company recognizes assets acquired and liabilities assumed at estimated fair value and adjusts liabilities for contingent consideration to estimates of fair value quarterly.
Fair value estimates for land, land improvements, building and leasehold improvements, and other property and equipment are calculated with primary reliance on the cost approach, with secondary consideration being placed on the market/sales comparison approach. Significant inputs include consideration of highest and best use, replacement costs, sales comparisons (recent transactions of comparable properties), and market approaches (and the properties’ ability to generate future benefits).
Fair value estimates for intangible assets are determined using a variety of methods depending on the asset type. Valuation methods generally used by the Company include: a relief-from-royalty method under the income approach that includes an estimate for a reasonable royalty rate; an excess earnings method under the income approach and/or a cost-to-replace approach; and a lost profits method under the income approach using the with and without methodology.