10-K 1 irreti.htm SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K


[X] Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For The Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2002

or

[  ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Commission File Number 333-64391

Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland

36-4246655

(State or other jurisdiction of

(I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization)

Identification Number)

2901 Butterfield Road,

Oak Brook, Illinois 60523

(Address of principal executive office)

(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  630-218-8000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class:

Name of each exchange on which registered:

None

None

   

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

 

Title of class:

 

None

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  X  No     

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

As of March 18, 2003, the aggregate market value of the shares of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $1,506,943,891 (based on the price for which each share was sold).

As of March 18, 2003, there were 150,944,516 shares of common stock outstanding.

Indicate by a checkmark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rule 12b-2)

           X   Yes          __ No


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(A Maryland corporation)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Part I

Page

     

Item 1.

Business

 3

     

Item 2.

Properties

 8

     

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

 22

     

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 22

     
     
 

Part II

 
     

Item 5.

Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

 23

     

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

 28

     

Item 7.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 30

     

Item 7(a)

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 52

     

Item 8.

Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 53

     

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

100

     
     
 

Part III

 
     

Item 10.

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

100

     

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

103

     

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

104

     

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

104

     

Item 14.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

106

 

Part IV

 
     

Item 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K

107

     

SIGNATURES

109

 

2


PART I

Item 1. Business

General

Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. (the "Company") was formed on September 3, 1998 as a Maryland corporation to acquire and manage a diversified portfolio of real estate, primarily multi-tenant shopping centers. We have initially focused on acquiring properties in the southeastern states, primarily Florida, Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina. The Company may also acquire properties east of the Mississippi River in addition to single-user retail properties in locations throughout the United States, certain of which may be sale and leaseback transactions, net leased to creditworthy tenants. Inland Retail Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc. (the "Advisor"), an affiliate of the Company, is the advisor to the Company. The Advisor has been retained to manage, for a fee, the Company's day-to-day affairs, subject to the supervision of the Company's Board of Directors.

On February 11, 1999, the Company commenced an Initial Public Offering (the "Initial Offering") on a best efforts basis of up to (i) 50,000,000 shares of common stock ("Shares") to the public at a price of $10.00 per Share, (ii) 4,000,000 Shares to participants in the distribution reinvestment program ("DRP") at a price of $9.50 per Share, (iii) 2,000,000 soliciting dealer warrants ("Soliciting Dealer Warrants") issuable to Inland Securities Corporation, the managing dealer of the Initial Offering (the "Dealer Manager"), at the rate of one Soliciting Dealer Warrant (for a price of $.0008 per Warrant) for each 25 Shares sold during the Initial Offering, and (iv) 2,000,000 Shares issuable upon the exercise of the Soliciting Dealer Warrants issued during the Initial Offering at a price of $12.00 per Share. The Initial Offering terminated on January 31, 2001 and a total of 13,687,349 Shares were sold to the public resulting in gross proceeds of $136,454,948. As of January 31, 2001, the Company had repurchased 60,475 Shares for $547,301 pursuant to the Share Repurchase Program. In addition, the Advisor purchased 20,000 Shares for $200,000 preceding the commencement of the Initial Offering.

On February 1, 2001, the Company commenced a Follow-On Public Offering (the "First Follow-On Offering") on a best efforts basis of up to (i) 50,000,000 additional Shares at a price of $10.00 per Share, (ii) 4,000,000 additional Shares pursuant to the DRP at a price of $9.50 per Share, (iii) 2,000,000 Soliciting Dealer Warrants, and (iv) 2,000,000 Shares issuable upon exercise of the Soliciting Dealer Warrants, all on substantially the same terms as in the Initial Offering. The First Follow-On Offering expired on February 1, 2002, but was extended to a date no later than February 1, 2003. As of August 29, 2002, the Company had sold 50,000,000 Shares from the First Follow-On Offering resulting in gross proceeds of $497,842,917, and repurchased 182,318 Shares for $1,719,927 pursuant to the Share Repurchase Program, thereby completing the First Follow-On Offering.

On June 7, 2002, concurrent with the First Follow-On Offering, a Second Follow-On Public Offering (the "Second Follow-On Offering") commenced on a best efforts basis of up to (i) 150,000,000 additional Shares at a price of $10.00 per Share, (ii) 12,000,000 additional Shares pursuant to the DRP at a price of $9.50 per Share, (iii) 6,000,000 soliciting dealer warrants, and (iv) 6,000,000 Shares issuable upon exercise of the Soliciting Dealer Warrants, all on substantially the same terms as the initial offering. As of December 31, 2002, the Company had sold 56,005,766 Shares from the Second Follow-On Offering resulting in gross proceeds of $558,368,022 and repurchased 182,356 Shares for $1,681,265 pursuant to the Share Repurchase Program. Collectively the Initial Offering, First Follow-On Offering and Second Follow-On Offering are referred to as the Offerings.

As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, subscriptions for a total of 119,713,115 and 35,294,860 Shares, respectively, had been received from the public, which include the 20,000 Shares issued to the Advisor. In addition, the Company distributed 3,025,137 and 785,365 Shares pursuant to the DRP as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. As of December 31, 2002, the Company repurchased 425,149 Shares and issued Soliciting Dealer Warrants to acquire 4,788,968 Shares. As a result of such sales and repurchases, the Company received a net total of $1,188,917,394 of Gross Offering Proceeds as of December 31, 2002. The Advisor has guaranteed payment of all public offering expenses (excluding selling commissions, the marketing contribution and the due diligence expense allowance) in excess of 5.5% of the Gross Offering Proceeds from the Offerings or all organization and offering expenses (including selling

3


commissions) which together exceeds 15% of the Gross Offering Proceeds. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, organizational and offering costs totaling $125,224,459 and $39,335,560, respectively, did not exceed these limitations. These costs did not exceed such limitations upon completion of the Initial Offering and First Follow-On Offering and the Company anticipates that these costs will not exceed these limitations upon completion of the Second Follow-On Offering. Any excess amounts at the completion of the Second Follow-On Offering will be reimbursed by the Advisor.

As of December 31, 2002, 4,788,968 Soliciting Dealer Warrants were sold to the Dealer Manager for a total of $3,831 and none of the Soliciting Dealer Warrants had been exercised for Shares.

Description of Business


We are the general partner of Inland Retail Real Estate Limited Partnership, an Illinois limited partnership (the "Operating Partnership"), organized for the purpose of acquiring, developing, owning, operating, improving, leasing, and otherwise managing for investment purposes, income producing commercial properties on behalf of the Company.


As of December 31, 2002, the Operating Partnership owned a portfolio of 106 properties and 6 parcels under development. The properties are located in Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, Tennessee, Alabama, Louisiana, Maryland, and Texas. At December 31, 2002, the portfolio consisted of 84 shopping centers, 21 free-standing single-user retail buildings, and 1 office complex containing an aggregate of approximately 13,550,700 square feet of gross leasable area ("GLA"), of which approximately 97% of GLA was leased.

Our headquarters are located at 2901 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 and our telephone number is (630) 218-8000.

Acquisition Strategies

We, through entities owned or controlled directly or indirectly by us (usually through the formation of Limited Liability Company Agreements, "LLCs," for which separate financial records are maintained), acquire and manage real estate primarily (i) improved for use as retail establishments, principally multi-tenant shopping centers, with GLA ranging from 10,000 to 300,000 square feet, but also including single-user retail facilities; or (ii) improved with other commercial facilities which provide goods or services. Each property acquired, considered, or proposed to be acquired by the Company, directly or indirectly, is referred to as a "Property," and all of such properties are collectively referred to as the "Properties."

The Properties are located mainly in the states east of the Mississippi River; the Company's "Primary Geographical Area of Investment." The Company initially focused in the southeastern states, primarily Florida, Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina. Among other real estate, the Company may also acquire, through entities owned or controlled directly or indirectly by the Company, single-user commercial properties located anywhere throughout the United States, if they are leased on a basis pursuant to which a creditworthy tenant is responsible for the base rent and all costs and expenses in connection, with and related to, property taxes, insurance, and repairs and maintenance applicable to the leased space (a "Triple-Net Lease Basis"). Such real estate includes properties acquired in sale and leaseback transactions ("Triple-Net Single User Retail Properties Outside the Primary Geographical Area of Investment"). The Properties in the Primary Geographical Area of Investment and the Triple-Net Single-User Retail Properties Outside the Primary Geographical Area of Investment are collectively referred to as the Company's "Primary Property Investments."


4


Key elements of the Company's acquisition strategy include:

  • Selectively acquiring diversified and well-located properties of the type described as the Company's Primary Property Investments.
  • Acquiring properties, in most cases, on an all-cash basis to provide the Company with a competitive advantage over potential purchasers who must secure financing. The Company may, however, acquire Properties subject to existing indebtedness if it believes this is in its best interest. The Company intends to obtain mortgage financing concurrently or subsequent to the purchase.

  • Diversifying geographically within the Primary Geographical Area of Investment by acquiring Properties primarily located in major consolidated metropolitan statistical areas, in order to minimize the potential adverse impact of economic downturns in certain markets.
  • Use the Company's UPREIT structure to acquire Properties for cash, Shares, limited partnership interests ("LP Common Units") of the Operating Partnership, preferred limited partnership interests of the Operating Partnership ("LP Preferred Units") (LP Common Units and LP Preferred Units are collectively referred to as "LP Units"), equity interests ("Interests") in a Property Partnership (as defined below), or a combination thereof. Use of this structure defers some or all of a seller's potential taxable gain, and enhances the ability of the Company to consummate transactions and to structure more competitive acquisitions than competitors that may lack the Company's ability to acquire Properties for cash, Shares, LP Units, Interests, or a combination thereof. A "Property Partnership" (collectively the "Property Partnerships") may be an entity, such as a limited liability company, a general or limited partnership, or a trust, that owns one or more of the Properties, and which will be owned or controlled directly or indirectly by the Operating Partnership.

 

Operating Strategies


Key elements of the Company's operating strategy include:

  • Actively managing costs and minimizing operating expenses by centralizing all management, leasing, marketing, financing, accounting, renovation and data processing activities.
  • Improving rental income and cash flow by aggressively marketing rentable space.
  • Emphasizing regular maintenance and periodic renovation to meet the needs of tenants and to maximize long-term returns.
  • Maintaining a diversified tenant base at its Retail Centers, consisting primarily of retail tenants providing consumer goods and services.
  • In general, limiting mortgage indebtedness to an aggregate amount not to exceed 55% of the combined fair market value of all of its Properties, however the Company's articles of incorporation provides for borrowings not to exceed 300% of the Company's net assets (which is generally defined as the Company's total assets, other than intangibles, at cost, before deducting depreciation and other non-cash reserves, less total liabilities, calculated at least quarterly). The proceeds from any such financings will be used primarily to allow the Company to acquire additional Properties (See "Financing Strategy"). The anticipated amount of leverage will be achieved over time; however, the aggregate financing on the Properties will initially exceed 55% of their combined fair market value. There can be no assurance that these objectives will be met.

 

5


Investment Objectives

The Company's investment objectives are: (i) to make regular distributions to its stockholders; (ii) to provide a hedge against inflation by entering into leases which contain clauses for scheduled rent escalations or participation in the growth of tenant sales, permitting the Company to increase distributions and realize capital appreciation; and (iii) to preserve stockholders' capital. It is the Company's policy to acquire Properties primarily for income, as distinguished from primarily for possible capital gain. There can be no assurance that these objectives will be met.

Financing Strategy

Generally, the Company intends to acquire Properties free and clear of permanent mortgage indebtedness by paying the entire purchase price of each Property in cash or for Shares, LP Units, Interests, or a combination of the foregoing. However, if it is determined to be in the best interest of the Company, the Company will, in certain instances, incur indebtedness to acquire Properties. With respect to Properties purchased on an all-cash basis (or for Shares, LP Units, Interests, or a combination thereof), the Company may later incur mortgage indebtedness by obtaining loans secured by selected Properties, if favorable financing terms are available. The proceeds from such loans would be used to acquire additional Properties. The Company may also incur indebtedness to finance improvements to its Properties. The Company anticipates that, in general, aggregate financings secured by all of the Company's Properties will not exceed 55% of their combined fair market value. The Company's Articles of Incorporation provide that the aggregate amount of borrowing, in relation to the Company's Net Assets, shall not, in the absence of a satisfactory showing that a higher level of borrowing is appropriate, exceed 300% of Net Assets. Any excess in borrowing over 300% of Net Assets shall (i) be approved by a majority of the Company's Independent Directors, (ii) be disclosed to stockholders in the Company's next quarterly report to stockholders, along with justification for such excess, and (iii) be subject to approval of the stockholders. There can be no assurances that these objectives will be met.

Developments During the 2002 Fiscal Year

During 2002, the Company invested approximately $897,957,000 for the acquisition of 55 shopping centers and 12 single- user retailer facilities purchased containing a total GLA of approximately 7,709,000 square feet. See Item 2 for a more detailed description of these Properties.

Tax Status

The Company is qualified and has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust or REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 or the Code. Since the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to Federal income tax to the extent it distributes at least 90% of its REIT taxable income to its shareholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, the Company will be subject to Federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on its taxable income at regular corporate rates. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and Property and to Federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed income.

Competition

In seeking new investment opportunities, we compete with other real estate investors, including pension funds, insurance companies, foreign investors, real estate partnerships, other real estate investment trusts, private individuals, and other domestic real estate companies, many of which have greater financial and other resources than the Company. With respect to Properties presently owned or to be owned by the Company, the Company competes with other owners of like properties for tenants. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully compete with such entities in its development, acquisition, and leasing activities in the future.


Business Risks

The Company's Primary Property Investments are located in the southeastern states. During 2002, as throughout the nation, the southeastern market experienced the economic slowdown. The local southeastern economies have been further impacted by the continued slowdown in airline travel and tourism. We believe that the effects of a continuing economic downturn should be mitigated by the fact that the tenants at our Properties, to a large extent, consist of: (1) retailers who serve primary non-discretionary shopping needs, such as grocers and pharmacies; (2) discount chains that can compete well during an economic downturn; and (3) national tenants with strong credit ratings that can withstand a downturn. The length and severity of any economic downturn cannot be predicted. The Company's operations could be negatively impacted to the extent that an economic downturn is prolonged or becomes more severe. The Kmart bankruptcy may negatively impact three of the four Kmart leased properties. The lease terms pertaining to the three Kmart stores anticipated to close represent approximately 1.8% of GLA and approximately 1% of rental income as of March 18, 2003. The Company believes that the diversification of creditworthy tenants provides additional mitigation of risks. As of March 18, 2003, the largest tenant in the portfolio, Publix, comprises approximately 8% of the GLA and approximately 5.6% of rental income.

Revenue from the properties depends on the amount of the tenants' retail revenue, making the Company vulnerable to general economic downturns and other conditions affecting the retail industry. Some of the leases provide for base rent plus contractual base rent increases. A number of the leases also include a percentage rent clause for additional rent above the base amount based upon a specified percentage of the sales the tenant generates. As of December 31, 2002, 15 of the over 1,300 tenant leases paid percentage rent totaling an aggregate of approximately $153,000, or less than 1% of the rental income for the year ended December 31, 2002. Under those leases which contain percentage rent clauses, the revenue from tenants may increase as the sales of the tenant increases. Generally, retailers face declining revenues during downturns in the economy. As a result, the portion of the revenue which the Company derives from percentage rent leases could decline upon a general economic downturn. Currently, there has been no appreciable change in the amount of percentage rental income received in the past year.

All real property investments are subject to some degree of risk. The Company is subject to risks existing due to a concentration of any single tenant within the portfolio. Currently, the largest tenant is Publix Supermarkets, which has 24 leases which represent approximately 1,055,000 square feet, or approximately 8% of the total gross leasable area owned by the Company as of March 18, 2003. The annualized base rental income of these Publix leases are approximately $9,374,000, or approximately 5.6% of the total annualized base rental income, based on the Company's portfolio of Properties as of March 18, 2003.

The loss of an anchor tenant or a major tenant of the Company or their inability to pay rent could have an adverse effect on the Company's business. See the Additional Information section on pages 43 and 44.

The Company's 84 shopping centers, one office building, and 21 free-standing single-retail buildings are occupied by many different types of retail tenants. Department discount stores, such as Wal-Mart, Kohl's and Ross Dress, occupy approximately 14% of the gross leasable area and provide approximately 8% of the annual base rent as of March 18, 2003. Grocery Stores occupy 17% of the gross leasable area and provide approximately 14% of annual base rents. Clothing stores occupy 6% of the gross leasable area and provide approximately 6% of annual base rents.

Employees

As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, the Company had one direct employee. The Company's employee is not covered by a collective bargaining agreement and the Company considers its employee relations to be satisfactory.

Financial Information About Industry Segments

We are in the business of owning, managing, operating, leasing, acquiring, developing, investing in, and disposing of, shopping centers and free-standing properties. We internally evaluate each property individually as a segment.

7


Item 2. Properties

As of December 31, 2002, we, through separate limited partnerships, limited liability companies, or joint venture agreements, have acquired fee ownership of 84 shopping centers, 1 office complex, and 21 free standing single-user retail buildings containing an aggregate of approximately 13,550,700 gross leasable square feet located in Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, Tennessee, Alabama, Louisiana, Maryland, and Texas.

 

Gross Leasable Area

Date

Year Built/

Amount of Mortgages Payable at

No. of Tenants as of

Major

 Property      

(Sq Ft)

Acquired

Renovated

12/31/02

12/31/02

Tenants*

             

Shopping Centers

           
             

Aberdeen Square

           

  Boynton Beach, FL

70,555

10/01

1990

$ 3,670,000

19

Publix

             

Abernathy Square

           

  Atlanta, GA

131,649

12/01

1983/

13,392,000

46

Publix

     

1994

   

Applebee's

           

Starbucks

             

Acworth Avenue Retail S.C.

           

Acworth, GA

16,130

12/00

2002

--

6

Buffalo's Cafe

   

03/02

       
             

Anderson Central

           

  Anderson, SC

223,211

11/01

1999

11,000,000

17

Wal-Mart

           

Dollar Tree

           

Blockbuster

           

Radio Shack

             

Bartow Marketplace

           

  Cartersville, GA

375,067

09/99

1995

13,475,000

18

Wal-Mart

           

Lowe's Home Center

             

Boynton Commons

           

  Boynton Beach, FL

210,772

07/99

1998

15,125,000

19

Sports Authority

           

Bed, Bath & Beyond

           

Barnes & Noble

           

PETsMART

             

Brandon Boulevard Shoppes

           

  Brandon, FL

85,377

11/01

1994

5,137,000

13

Publix

           

Blockbuster

           

Subway

           

Pizza Hut

           

Hallmark

 8


 

Gross Leasable Area

Date

Year Built/

Amount of Mortgages Payable at

No. of Tenants as of

Major

 Property      

(Sq Ft)

Acquired

Renovated

12/31/02

12/31/02

Tenants*

             

Bridgewater Marketplace

           

  Orlando, FL

58,050

09/99

1998

$2,987,500

12

Winn-Dixie

             

Casselberry Commons

           

  Casselberry, FL

227,664

12/99

1973/

8,703,000

39

Ross Stores

     

1998

   

Publix

             

Chatham Crossing

           

  Siler City, NC

32,000

12/02

2002

--

12

State Employees

           

San Felipe

           

Shoe Show

           

New China Buffet

           

Dollar Tree

             

Chesterfield Crossings

           

  Richmond, VA

68,898

06/02

2000

6,380,000

16

PETsMART

           

Fashion Bug

           

GNC

           

Payless Shoes

             

Chickasaw Trails

           

Orlando, FL

75,492

08/01

1994

4,400,000

17

Publix

           

Blockbuster

           

Subway

           

Radio Shack

             

Circuit City Plaza

           

  Orlando, FL

78,625

07/02

1999

6,275,000

16

Circuit City

           

Staples

           

Quizno's

             

Citrus Hills

           

  Citrus Hills, FL

68,927

12/01

1994

3,000,000

11

Publix

           

Blockbuster

             

City Crossing

           

  Warner Robins, GA

187,099

11/02

2001

--

18

Old Navy

           

Stein Mart

           

Michaels

           

Ross Dress

             

Clayton Corners

           

  Clayton, NC

125,656

11/02

1999/

9,850,000

32

Lowe's Foods

     

2001

   

Dollar General

           

GNC

           

Sherwin-Williams

 9


 

Gross Leasable Area

Date

Year Built/

Amount of Mortgages Payable at

No. of Tenants as of

Major

 Property      

(Sq Ft)

Acquired

Renovated

12/31/02

12/31/02

Tenants*

             

Columbia Promenade

           

  Kissimmee, FL

65,870

01/01

2000

$3,600,000

16

Publix

           

Supercuts

           

Dollar Store

Columbiana Station

           

  Columbia, SC

270,649

12/02

1999

--

27

Circuit City

           

Goody's

           

Dick's Sporting Goods

             

Comp USA Retail Center

           

  Newport News, VA

47,134

11/02

1999

--

3

Comp USA

           

Cost Plus

             

Conway Plaza

           

  Orlando, FL

119,106

02/00

1985/

5,000,000

24

Bealls

     

1999

   

Publix

             

Countryside

           

Naples, FL

73,965

10/99

1997

4,300,000

8

Winn-Dixie

             

Cox Creek

           

  Florence, AL

173,934

09/02

2001

15,251,565

13

Best Buy

           

Linens N Things

           

Dick's Sporting Goods

             

Creekwood Crossing

           

Bradenton, FL

227,052

11/01

2001

11,750,000

21

Kmart

           

Bealls

           

Subway

             

Crystal Springs

           

  Crystal Springs, FL

67,021

04/02

2001

4,070,000

13

Publix

           

Blockbuster

           

Hallmark

           

H&R Block

             

Douglasville Pavilion

           

  Douglasville, GA

267,764

12/01

1998

16,285,000

22

Goody's

           

OfficeMax

           

Marshalls

             

Duvall Village

           

  Bowie, MD

82,522

11/02

2001

9,476,625

13

A&P Grocery

           

H&R Block

           

Service Cleaners

 10


 

Gross Leasable Area

Date

Year Built/

Amount of Mortgages Payable at

No. of Tenants as of

Major

 Property      

(Sq Ft)

Acquired

Renovated

12/31/02

12/31/02

Tenants*

             

Eisenhower Crossing I & II

           

Macon, GA

403,013

11/01

2001

$23,800,000

17

Old Navy

   

3/02

     

Staples

           

Michaels

           

Marshalls

           

Goody's

             

Fayetteville Pavilion

           

Fayetteville, NC

272,385

12/01

1998/

17,390,000

20

Food Lion

     

2001

   

Marshalls

           

Radio Shack

           

Michaels

             

Forest Hills Centre

           

  Wilson, NC

73,280

02/02

1998

--

16

Harris Teeter

           

Eckerds

             

Forestdale Plaza

           

  Jamestown, NC

53,239

08/02

2001

3,319,000

9

Food Lion

           

Domino's Pizza

           

Great Clips

             

Gateway Market Center

           

  St. Petersburg, FL

231,449

07/00

1999/

10,425,000

16

Bealls

     

2000

   

Publix

           

TJ Maxx

           

Office Depot

             

Gateway Plaza - Conway

           

  Conway, SC

62,428

12/02

2002

--

8

Office Depot

           

Dollar Tree

           

Goody's

             

Gateway Plaza - Jacksonville

  Jacksonville, NC

101,682

11/02

2000/

--

13

Bed, Bath, & Beyond

     

2001

   

Ross Stores

           

PETsMART

             

Golden Gate

           

  Greensboro, NC

153,114

10/02

1962/

--

22

Harris Teeter

     

2002

   

Staples

           

Food Lion

             

Goldenrod Groves

           

  Orlando, FL

108,944

11/02

1985/

--

27

Walgreens

     

1998

   

Publix

 11


 

Gross Leasable Area

Date

Year Built/

Amount of Mortgages Payable at

No. of Tenants as of

Major

 Property      

(Sq Ft)

Acquired

Renovated

12/31/02

12/31/02

Tenants*

             

Hairston Crossing

           

  Decatur, GA

57,884

02/02

2001/

$ 3,655,000

11

Publix

     

2002

   

Starbucks

           

Washington Mutual

           

Fantastic Sams

Hampton Point

           

  Taylors, SC

58,316

05/02

1993

2,475,000

5

Bi-Lo Grocery

           

Advance Auto

             

Harundale Plaza

           

  Glen Burnie, MD

274,160

11/02

1999

--

17

Super Fresh

           

Value City

             

Hillsboro Square

           

  Deerfield Beach, FL

145,647

06/02

1961

12,100,000

29

Publix

           

Eckerds

           

GNC

             

Jones Bridge Plaza

           

  Norcross, GA

83,363

11/02

1999

--

12

Ingles

             

Lake Olympia Square

           

Ocoee, FL

85,776

09/99

1995

5,478,984

19

Winn-Dixie

           

Tutor Time Child Care

           

Systems

             

Lake Walden Square

           

  Plant City, FL

256,155

05/99

1992

$  9,699,828

34

Kash N' Karry Foods

           

Kmart

           

Carmike Cinemas

             

Lakeview Plaza

           

  Kissimmee, FL

54,788

12/02

1998

3,613,237

11

Publix

           

Dollar One

           

Hair Cuttery

             

Lakewood Ranch

           

  Bradenton, FL

69,472

11/02

2001

4,400,000

16

Publix

           

Beef O'Brady

           

Mailboxes Etc.

             

12


 

Gross Leasable Area

Date

Year Built/

Amount of Mortgages Payable at

No. of Tenants as of

Major

 Property      

(Sq Ft)

Acquired

Renovated

12/31/02

12/31/02

Tenants*

             

McFarland Plaza

           

  Tuscaloosa, AL

221,807

07/02

1999

$ 8,425,000

17

Toys R Us

           

Office Max

           

Circuit City

           

Old Navy

             

Meadowmont Village

           

  Chapel Hill, NC

133,471

12/02

2002

--

16

Harris Teater

             
             

Melbourne Shopping Center

           

  Melbourne, FL

209,217

04/02

1960/

5,947,967

26

Publix

     

1999

   

Big Lots

           

Hallmark

           

Beall's Outlet

             

Merchants Square

           

  Zephyrhills, FL

74,849

06/99

1993

3,167,437

12

Kash N' Karry Foods

           

Fashion Bug

             

Newnan Pavilion

           

  Newnan, GA

481,004

03/02

2002

20,726,371

24

Home Depot

           

Kohl's

           

Circuit City

           

Office Max

             

North Aiken Bi-Lo Center

           

  Aiken, SC

59,204

10/02

2002

--

7

Bi-Lo Grocery

             

Northpoint Marketplace

           

  Spartanburg, SC

101,982

05/02

2002

4,535,000

14

Ingles Market

           

Subway

           

Happy Nails

           

Dollar City

             

Oleander Shopping Center

           

  Wilmington, NC

51,888

05/02

1989

3,000,000

3

Lowe's Foods

           

Blockbuster

           

Supercuts

             

Plant City Crossing

           

  Plant City, FL

85,252

11/02

2001

--

21

Publix

             

Pleasant Hill

           

  Duluth, GA

282,137

05/00

1997/

17,120,000

21

JC Penney

     

1999

   

Toys R Us

           

JoAnn Fabrics

 13


 

Gross Leasable Area

Date

Year Built/

Amount of Mortgages Payable at

No. of Tenants as of

Major

 Property      

(Sq Ft)

Acquired

Renovated

12/31/02

12/31/02

Tenants*

             

Presidential Commons

           

  Snellville, GA

372,149

11/02

1998

$26,066,555

35

Home Depot

           

Kroger

           

JoAnn Fabrics

           

Petco

           

Circuit City

             

River Ridge

           

  Birmingham, AL

158,755

11/02

2001

--

12

Staples

           

Linens N Things

           

Best Buy

           

Cost Plus

Riverstone Plaza

           

Canton, GA

302,024

04/02

1998

17,600,000

48

Publix

  

         

Goody's

           

Michaels

           

Ross Stores

             

Rosedale Shopping Center

           

  Huntersville, NC

94,248

12/02

2000

13,300,000

29

Harris Teeter

           

CVS

           

Blockbuster

             

Sand Lake Corners

           

  Orlando, FL

189,741

05/01

1998/

11,900,000

40

Bealls

     

2000

   

Staples

           

Quizno's

           

PETsMART

           

Dollar Tree

             

Sarasota Pavilion

           

  Sarasota, FL

324,140

01/02

1999

29,850,000

32

Publix

           

Stein Mart

           

Marshalls

           

Michaels

             

Sexton Commons

           

  Fuquay Varina, NC

49,097

08/02

2001/

4,400,000

6

Harris Teeter

     

2002

   

RMS Foods

           

Hair Cuttery

             

Sharon Greens

           

  Cumming, GA

98,317

05/02

2001

6,500,000

16

Kroger

           

Dollar Tree

           

Washington Mutual

           

GNC

 14


 

Gross Leasable Area

Date

Year Built/

Amount of Mortgages Payable at

No. of Tenants as of

Major

 Property      

(Sq Ft)

Acquired

Renovated

12/31/02

12/31/02

Tenants*

             

Shoppes at Citiside

           

  Charlotte, NC

75,478

12/02

2002

$     --

10

Bi-Lo Grocery

             

Shoppes at Lake Mary

           

  Lake Mary, FL

69,843

08/02

2001

6,250,000

15

Staples

           

CATO

           

Card Party Warehouse

           

Quizno's

Shoppes at New Tampa

           

  Wesley Chapel, FL

158,342

12/02

2002

--

23

Publix

           

Bealls

             

Shoppes of Golden Acres

           

  Newport Richey, FL

76,371

10/02

2002

--

14

Publix

             

Shoppes on the Circle

           

  Dolton, AL

149,085

11/02

2000

12,200,088

19

TJ Maxx

           

Office Max

           

Old Navy

           

PETsMART

             

Skyview Plaza

           

  Orlando, FL

281,247

09/01

1994/

10,875,000

34

Publix

     

1998

   

Kmart

           

Walgreens

           

Blockbuster

Southlake Pavilion

           

  Morrow, GA

525,162

12/01

1996/

34,602,709

34

Old Navy

     

2001

   

Linens N Things

           

Staples

           

Barnes & Noble

             

Southlake Shopping Center

           

  Cornelius, NC

131,247

11/02

1988/

7,683,755

24

Harris Teeter

     

2000

   

Stein Mart

           

Eckerd Drugs

           

Hallmark

             

Steeplechase Plaza

           

  Ocala, FL

87,380

12/01

1993

4,651,350

17

Publix

           

Walgreens

           

Bealls

             

Stonebridge Square

           

  Roswell, GA

160,104

10/01

2001

10,900,000

14

Kohl's

   

6/02

     

Linens N Things

 15


 

Gross Leasable Area

Date

Year Built/

Amount of Mortgages Payable at

No. of Tenants as of

Major

 Property      

(Sq Ft)

Acquired

Renovated

12/31/02

12/31/02

Tenants*

             

Sycamore Commons

           

  Matthews, NC

247,513

07/02

2001/

$20,000,000

24

Circuit City

     

2002

   

Old Navy

           

Bed, Bath & Beyond

           

Michaels

Target Center

           

  Columbia, SC

79,253

04/02

2002

4,192,000

3

Michaels

         

Linens N Things

           

Office Max

             

Town Center Commons

           

  Kennesaw, GA

72,108

07/99

1998

4,750,000

13

JC Penney Home Store

           

Baptist Book Store

             

Turkey Creek Phase I

           

  Knoxville, TN

187,760

01/02

2001

13,220,000

20

Old Navy

           

Goody's

           

Linens N Things

             

Universal Plaza

           

  Lauderhill, FL

49,816

01/02

2001

4,970,000

22

Eckerd Drug Store

           

Starbucks

           

Ruby Tuesday

             

Venture Pointe

           

  Duluth, GA

334,620

12/01

1996

15,790,000

12

Kohl's

           

Hallmark

           

Hobby Lobby

             

Village Square at Golf

           

  Boynton Beach, FL

134,894

11/02

1983/

--

42

Publix

     

2002

     
             

Wakefield Crossing

           

  Raleigh, NC

75,929

08/02

2001

5,920,000

16

Food Lion

           

Front Row Sports

           

Quizno's

             

Walk at Highwoods I

           

  Tampa, FL

133,940

07/02

2001

13,230,000

22

Linens N Things

           

Michaels

           

Circuit City

           

Panera Bread

             
             

16


 

Gross Leasable Area

Date

Year Built/

Amount of Mortgages Payable at

No. of Tenants as of

Major

 Property      

(Sq Ft)

Acquired

Renovated

12/31/02

12/31/02

Tenants*

             

Ward's Crossing

           

  Lynchburg, VA

80,918

06/02

2001

$ 6,090,000

10

Michaels

           

Bed, Bath & Beyond

           

Pier 1

           

Rack Room Shoes

             

West Oaks

           

  Ocoee, FL

66,539

03/01

2000

4,900,000

10

Michaels

           

State Farm

           

Family Christian Store

             

Woodstock Square

           

  Atlanta, GA

218,819

06/01

2001

14,000,000

24

Kohl's

           

OfficeMax

           

Old Navy

           

PETsMART

           

Ulta

           

GNC

Office

           
             
             

Logger Head Junction

           

  Sarasota, FL

4,711

02/02

1980/

--

7

Inland Retail

     

1984

   

Professional Medical

           

Medical

           

Manatee-Pinellas

             

Single-User Retail

           
             

Bass Pro Outdoor World

           

  Dania Beach, FL

165,000

06/02

1999

9,100,000

1

Bass Pro Outdoor World

             

Circuit City - Cary

           

  Cary, NC

27,891

09/02

2000

--

1

Circuit City

             

Circuit City - Rome

           

  Rome, GA

33,056

06/02

2001

2,470,000

1

Circuit City

             

Circuit City - Vero Beach

           

  Vero Beach, FL

33,243

06/02

2001

3,120,000

1

Circuit City

             

Eckerd Drug Store -Blackstock

           

   Spartanburg, SC

10,908

08/02

2002

--

1

Eckerd Drug Store

             

17


 

Gross Leasable Area

Date

Year Built/

Amount of Mortgages Payable at

No. of Tenants as of

Major

 Property      

(Sq Ft)

Acquired

Renovated

12/31/02

12/31/02

Tenants*

             

Eckerd Drug Store -Concord

           

  Concord, NC

10,908

04/02

2002

$     --

1

Eckerd Drug Store

             

Eckerd Drug Store -Greenville

           

  Greenville, SC

10,908

11/01

2001

1,540,400

1

Eckerd Drug Store

             

Eckerd Drug Store -Spartanburg

           

  Spartanburg, SC

10,908

12/01

2001

1,541,600

1

Eckerd Drug Store

             

Eckerd Drug Store - Tega Cay

           

  Tega Cay, SC

13,824

04/02

2002

--

1

Eckerd Drug Store

             

Eckerd Drug Store - Woodruff

           

  Woodruff, SC

13,824

11/02

2002

--

1

Eckerd Drug Store

             

JoAnn Fabrics - Alpharetta

           

  Alpharetta, GA

44,418

06/01

2000

2,450,000

1

JoAnn Fabrics

             

Just For Feet - Augusta

           

  Augusta, GA

22,115

02/02

1999

1,668,000

1

Just For Feet

             

Just For Feet - Covington

           

  Covington, LA

20,116

02/02

1999

1,885,000

1

Just For Feet

             

Just For Feet - Daytona

           

  Daytona Beach, FL

22,255

08/01

1998

2,000,000

1

Just For Feet

             

Kmart

           

  Macon, GA

102,098

02/01

2000

4,655,000

1

Kmart

             

Lowe's Home Improv. Center

           

  Warner Robbins, GA

131,575

02/01

2000

4,845,000

1

Lowe's

             

PETsMART - Chattanooga

           

  Chattanooga, TN

26,040

04/01

1995

1,303,800

1

PETsMART

             

PETsMART - Daytona Beach

           

  Daytona Beach, FL

26,194

04/01

1996

1,361,200

1

PETsMART

             

PETsMART-  Fredericksburg

           

  Fredericksburg, VA

26,067

04/01

1997

1,435,000

1

PETsMART

             

Rainbow Foods -Rowlett

           

  Rowlett, TX

63,117

11/02

1995/

--

1

Rainbow Foods

             

Rainbow Foods - Garland

           

  Garland, TX

70,576

11/02

1994

--

1

Rainbow Foods

 18


 

Gross Leasable Area

Date

Year Built/

Amount of Mortgages Payable at

No. of Tenants as of

Major

Development Projects

(Sq Ft)

Acquired

Renovated

12/31/02

12/31/02

Tenants*

Citrus Hills - Blockbuster

  Citrus Hills, FL

N/A

12/01

N/A

$     --

--

Eckerd Drug Store - Gaffney

  Gaffney, SC

N/A

12/02

N/A

--

--

Eckerd Drug Store- Perry Creek

  Raleigh, NC

N/A

09/02

N/A

--

--

Shoppes at Chalet Suzanne

  Lake Wales, FL

N/A

12/02

N/A

--

--

Southampton Village

  Tyrone, GA

N/A

11/02

N/A

--

--

Southwood Plantation

  Tallahassee, FL

   N/A  

10/02

N/A

     --     

--

Portfolio Total

13,550,686

   

$675,621,971

   
 

========

   

=========

   

*Major tenants include tenants leasing more than 10% of the gross leasable area of a property.

See Schedule III on page 89 for initial property costs.

19


The majority of the income from our properties consists of rent received under long-term leases. Most of the leases provide for the payment of fixed minimum rent, monthly in advance, and for the payment by tenants of a pro rata share of the real estate taxes, special assessments, insurance, utilities, common area maintenance, management fees, and certain building repairs of the shopping center. Certain of the major tenant leases provide that the landlord is obligated to pay certain of these expenses above or below specific levels. Some of the leases also provide for the payment of percentage rent, calculated as a percentage of a tenant's gross sales above predetermined thresholds.

The following table lists the approximate physical occupancy levels for the Company's investment properties as of December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000. N/A indicates the property was not owned by the Company at the end of the year.

2002

2001

2000

Properties:

  (%)  

  (%)  

    (%)  

Aberdeen Square, Boynton Beach, FL

100*

96*

N/A

Abernathy Square, Atlanta, GA

91

92

N/A

Acworth Avenue Retail Shopping Center, Acworth, GA

73

N/A

N/A

Anderson Central, Anderson, SC

99

100

N/A

Bartow Marketplace, Cartersville, GA

100

99

100

Bass Pro Outdoor World, Dania Beach, FL

100

N/A

N/A

Boynton Commons, Boynton Beach, FL

100

100*

96*

Brandon Boulevard Shoppes, Brandon, FL

89*

93*

N/A

Bridgewater Marketplace, Orlando, FL

96

97*

98 

Casselberry Commons, Casselberry, FL

94

92*

95*

Chatham Crossing, Siler City, FL

100

N/A

N/A

Chesterfield Crossings, Richmond, VA

100

N/A

N/A

Chickasaw Trails Shopping Center, Orlando, FL

100

100

N/A

Circuit City - Cary, Cary, NC

100

N/A

N/A

Circuit City Plaza, Orlando, FL

100*

N/A

N/A

Circuit City - Rome, Rome, GA

100

N/A

N/A

Circuit City - Vero Beach, Vero Beach, FL

100

N/A

N/A

Citrus Hills, Citrus Hills, FL

91*

100*

N/A

City Crossing, Warner Robins, GA

100*

N/A

N/A

Clayton Corners, Clayton, NC

97*

N/A

N/A

Columbia Promenade, Kissimmee, FL

93*

98*

N/A

Columbiana Station, Columbia, SC

98

N/A

N/A

Comp USA Retail Center, Newport News, VA

100

N/A

N/A

Conway Plaza, Orlando, FL

99

100*

97*

Countryside, Naples, FL

85

85

97 

Cox Creek, Florence, AL

100*

N/A

N/A

Creekwood Crossing, Bradenton, FL

100

96

N/A

Crystal Springs Shopping Center, Crystal Springs, FL

100*

N/A

N/A

Douglasville Pavilion, Douglasville, GA

100

100*

N/A

Duvall Village, Bowie, MD

100*

N/A

N/A

Eckerd Drug Store - Blackstock, Spartanburg, SC

100

N/A

N/A

Eckerd Drug Store - Concord, Concord, NC

100

N/A

N/A

Eckerd Drug Store - Greenville, Greenville, SC

100

100

N/A

Eckerd Drug Store - Spartanburg, Spartanburg, SC

100

100

N/A

Eckerd Drug Store -Tega Cay, Tega Cay, SC

100

N/A

N/A

Eckerd Drug Store - Woodruff, Woodruff, SC

100

N/A

N/A

Eisenhower Crossing, Macon, GA

97*

91*

N/A

Fayetteville Pavilion, Fayetteville, NC

100*

100*

N/A

Forest Hills Centre, Wilson, NC

97*

N/A

N/A

Forestdale Plaza, Jamestown, NC

85*

N/A

N/A

 20


2002

2001

2000

Properties:

  (%)  

  (%)  

    (%)  

Gateway Market Center, St. Petersburg, FL

90

83

98

Gateway Plaza - Jacksonville, Jacksonville, NC

96*

N/A

N/A

Gateway Plaza - Conway, Conway, SC

96*

N/A

N/A

Golden Gate, Greensboro, NC

90

N/A

N/A

Goldenrod Groves, Orlando, FL

90

N/A

N/A

Hairston Crossing, Decatur, GA

100*

N/A

N/A

Hampton Point, Taylors, SC

100

N/A

N/A

Harundale Plaza, Glen Burnie, MD

97*

N/A

N/A

Hillsboro Square, Deerfield Beach, FL

100*

N/A

N/A

Jo-Ann Fabrics, Alpharetta, GA

100

100

N/A

Jones Bridge Plaza, Norcross, GA

96*

N/A

N/A

Just for Feet - Augusta, Augusta, GA

100

N/A

N/A

Just for Feet - Covington, Covington, LA

100

N/A

N/A

Just for Feet - Daytona, Daytona Beach, FL

100

100

N/A

Kmart, Macon, GA

100

100

N/A

Lake Olympia Square, Ocoee, FL

97

93

95 

Lake Walden Square, Plant City, FL

94

95

95 

Lakeview Plaza, Kissimmee, FL

98

N/A

N/A

Lakewood Ranch, Bradenton, FL

98*

N/A

N/A

Logger Head Junction, Sarasota, FL

81

N/A

N/A

Lowe's Home Improvement Center, Warner Robins, GA

100

100

N/A

McFarland Plaza, Tuscaloosa, AL

97

N/A

N/A

Meadowmont Village Center, Chapel Hill, NC

76*

N/A

N/A

Melbourne Shopping Center, Melbourne, FL

97

N/A

N/A

Merchants Square, Zephyrhills, FL

100

100

100

Newnan Pavilion, Newnan, GA

98

N/A

N/A

North Aiken Bi-Lo Center, Aiken, SC

100

N/A

N/A

Northpoint Marketplace, Spartanburg, SC

90*

N/A

N/A

Oleander Shopping Center, Wilmington, NC

100

N/A

N/A

PETsMART - Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN

100

100

N/A

PETsMART - Daytona Beach, Daytona Beach, FL

100

100

N/A

PETsMART - Fredericksburg, Fredericksburg, VA

100

100

N/A

Plant City Crossing, Plant City, FL

93*

N/A

N/A

Pleasant Hill, Duluth, GA

96*

97*

94*

Presidential Commons, Snellville, GA

100

N/A

N/A

Rainbow Foods - Garland, Garland, TX

100

N/A

N/A

Rainbow Foods - Rowlett, Rowlett, TX

100

N/A

N/A

River Ridge, Birmingham, AL

100

N/A

N/A

Riverstone Plaza, Canton, GA

99*

N/A

N/A

Rosedale Shopping Center, Huntersville, NC

96*

N/A

N/A

Sand Lake Corners, Orlando, FL

99*

97*

N/A

Sarasota Pavilion, Sarasota, FL

100*

N/A

N/A

Sexton Commons, Fuquay Varina, NC

91*

N/A

N/A

Sharon Greens, Atlanta, GA

82*

N/A

N/A

Shoppes at Citiside, Charlotte, NC

90*

N/A

N/A

Shoppes of Golden Acres, Newport Richey, FL

74

N/A

N/A

Shoppes at Lake Mary, Lake Mary, FL

100*

N/A

N/A

Shoppes at New Tampa, Wesley Chapel, FL

94*

N/A

N/A

Shoppes on the Circle, Dolton, AL

96*

N/A

N/A

Skyview Plaza, Orlando, FL

100

100

N/A

 21


2002

2001

2000

Properties:

  (%)  

  (%)  

    (%)  

Southlake Pavilion, Morrow, GA

99*

100*

N/A

Southlake Shopping Center, Cornelius, NC

97*

N/A

N/A

Steeplechase Plaza, Ocala, FL

100

100*

N/A

Stonebridge Square, Roswell, GA

99

N/A

N/A

Sycamore Commons, Matthews, NC

93*

N/A

N/A

Target Center, Columbia, SC

100

N/A

N/A

Town Center Commons, Kennesaw, GA

93

93

93 

Turkey Creek Phase I, Knoxville, TN

100*

N/A

N/A

Universal Plaza, Lauderhill, FL

99*

N/A

N/A

Venture Pointe, Duluth, GA

100*

100*

N/A

Village Square at Golf, Boynton Beach, FL

92

N/A

N/A

Wakefield Crossing, Raleigh, NC

98*

N/A

N/A

Walks at Highwoods I, Tampa, FL`

96*

N/A

N/A

Ward's Crossing, Lynchburg, VA

98*

N/A

N/A

West Oaks, Ocoee, FL

95

100*

N/A

Woodstock Square, Atlanta, GA

100*

99*

N/A

*As part of the purchase of these Properties, the Company is entitled to receive payments in accordance with the master lease agreements for space which was not producing revenue either at the time of, or subsequent to the purchase. The master lease agreements cover rental payments due for a period from one to three years from the purchase date. The percentages in the table above do not include non-revenue producing space covered by the master lease agreements. The master lease agreements, combined with the physical occupancy, results in an economic occupancy range from 73% to 100% at December 31, 2002.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are subject, from time to time, to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. While the resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes, based on currently available information, that the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2002.

 22


PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

Market Information

There is no established public trading market for our shares of common stock. The per share estimated value shall be deemed to be the offering price of the shares, which is currently $10.00 per share. This valuation is supported by the fact that we are currently selling shares to the public at a price of $10.00 per share as of March 18, 2003.

On June 7, 2002, we commenced the second follow-on offering on a best effort basis of up to 150,000,000 shares. This follow-on offering expires on June 7, 2003, but may be extended to a date no later than June 7, 2004.

We will provide the following programs to facilitate investment in the shares and to provide limited liquidity for stockholders until such time as a market for the shares develops:

The DRP, subject to certain Share ownership restrictions, will allow stockholders who purchase Shares in an offering to automatically reinvest distributions by purchasing additional Shares from the Company. Such purchases under the DRP will not be subject to selling commissions, or the marketing contribution and due diligence expense allowance, and are made at a price of $9.50 per Share. That price will continue to be used until the public offering price per Share in the offering is increased from $10.00 per Share (if ever) or until the termination of the offering, whichever occurs first. Thereafter, participants may acquire Shares under the DRP at a price equal to 95% of the "market price" of a Share on the date of purchase until such time (if ever) as the Shares are listed on a national stock exchange or included for quotation on a national market system. In the event of such listing or inclusion, Shares purchased by the Company for the DRP will be purchased on such exchange or market at the then prevailing market price, and will be sold to participants at that price.

The Share Repurchase Program ("SRP"), subject to certain restrictions, may provide eligible stockholders with limited, interim liquidity by enabling them to sell Shares back to the Company. The prices at which Shares may be sold back to the Company are as follows:

    • One year from the purchase date, at $9.25 per share;
    • Two years from the purchase date, at $9.50 per share;
    • Three years from the purchase date, at $9.75 per share; and
    • Four years from the purchase date, at $10.00 per share, or a price equal to 10 times our "funds

available for distribution" per weighted average shares outstanding for the prior calendar year.

The Company will make repurchases under the SRP, if requested, at least once quarterly on a first-come, first-served basis. Subject to funds being available, the Company will limit the number of Shares repurchased during any calendar year to one-half of one percent (0.5%) of the weighted average number of Shares outstanding during the prior calendar year. Funding for the SRP will come exclusively from proceeds that the Company receives from the sale of Shares under the DRP and such other operating funds, if any, as the Company's Board of Directors, at its sole discretion, may reserve for this purpose.

The Company's Board of Directors, at its sole discretion, may choose to terminate the SRP after the end of the Offering period, or reduce the number of Shares purchased under the SRP, if it determines that the funds allocated to the SRP are needed for other purposes, such as the acquisition, maintenance or repair of properties, or for use in making a declared distribution. A determination by the Board of Directors to eliminate or reduce the SRP will require the unanimous affirmative vote of the Independent Directors.

 23


The Company cannot guarantee that the funds set aside for the SRP will be sufficient to accommodate all requests made each year. If no funds are available for the SRP when repurchase is requested, the stockholder may: (i) withdraw the request; or (ii) ask that the Company honor the request at such time, if any, when funds are available. Such pending requests will be honored on a first-come, first-served basis.

There is no requirement that stockholders sell their Shares to the Company. The SRP is only intended to provide interim liquidity for stockholders until a liquidity event occurs, such as the listing of the Shares on a national securities exchange, inclusion of the Shares for quotation on a national market system, or a merger with a listed company. No assurance can be given that any such liquidity event will occur.

Shares purchased by the Company under the SRP will be canceled and will have the status of authorized but unissued Shares. Shares acquired by the Company through the SRP will not be reissued unless they are first registered with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"), and under appropriate state securities laws, or otherwise issued in compliance with such laws.

Stockholders

As of March 18, 2003, there were 37,347 stockholders of record of the Company.

Distributions

We have been paying monthly distributions since June 1999. The table below depicts the distribution levels from our inception. The rate shown is the annual per share amount.

Rate
 (per Share per annum) 

Date Declared

Date Distributed

$  .70

June 1, 1999

June 7, 1999

$  .73

July, 1, 1999

August 7, 1999

$  .75

November 1, 1999

December 7, 1999

$  .76

April 1, 2000

May 7, 2000

$  .77

August 1, 2000

September 7, 2000

$  .78

October 1, 2000

November 7, 2000

$  .80

December 1, 2000

January 7, 2001

$  .81

September 1, 2001

October 7, 2001

$  .82

April 1, 2002

May 7, 2002

$  .83

August 1, 2002

September 7, 2002

We declared distributions to our stockholders per weighted average number of shares outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 totaling $.83, $.81 and $.77, respectively. Of these amounts, $.52, $.49 and $.42 qualifies as distributions taxable as ordinary income and $.31, $.32 and $.35 constitutes a return of capital for Federal income tax purposes for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

As of March 18, 2003, we have sold the following securities for the following offering prices: In September 1998, Inland Retail Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc., the Advisor, purchased from us 20,000 shares for $10.00 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $200,000, in connection with our organization. The Advisor also made a capital contribution to our operating partnership, Inland Retail Real Estate Limited Partnership in the amount of $2,000 in exchange for 200 LP common units of the operating partnership. The 200 LP common units received by the Advisor may be exchanged, at the option of the Advisor, for 200 Shares of the Company. No sales commissions or other consideration were paid in connection with such sales, which were consummated without registration in Section 4(2) of the Act as transactions not involving any public offering.

Options to purchase an aggregate of 13,500 shares at an exercise price of $9.05 per share have been granted to the independent directors pursuant to the Independent Directors Stock Option Plan (options to purchase 3,000 Shares as to each of the Independent Directors plus options for 500 Shares each on the date of the first annual meeting and 500 Shares each on the date of each annual meeting thereafter). Such options were granted, without registration under the Act, in reliance upon the exemption from registration in Section 4(2) of the Act, as transactions not involving any public offering. None of such options have been exercised. Therefore, no Shares have been issued in connection with such options.

24


Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities

 

We registered, pursuant to a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933 (SEC File Number 333-64391), the initial offering on a best efforts basis of 50,000,000 shares at $10.00 per share, subject to discounts in certain cases; up to 4,000,000 shares at $9.50 per share pursuant to our DRP; 2,000,000 soliciting dealer warrants at $.0008 per soliciting dealer warrants; and 2,000,000 shares issuable upon exercise of the soliciting dealer warrants at an exercise price of $12.00 per share. The initial offering commenced on February 11, 1999 and terminated on January 31, 2001. On February 1, 2001 we began the first follow-on offering (SEC File Number 333-50822) with substantially similar conditions as the initial offering. As of August 29, 2002, we sold 50,000,000 shares from the first follow-on offering, thereby completing the second offering. On June 7, 2002, concurrent with the first follow-on offering, we began the second follow-on offering (SEC File Number 333-85666) on a best effort basis of 150,000,000 shares of common stock at $10.00 per share, and up to 12,000,000 shares at $9.50 per share, pursuant to the company's DRP; 6,000,000 soliciting dealer warrants at $.0008 per soliciting dealer warrants; and 6,000,000 shares issuable upon exercise of the soliciting dealer warrants at an exercise price of $12.00 per share.

As of January 31, 2001, we have sold the following securities in the initial offering for the following aggregate offering prices:

*

13,687,349

shares on a best efforts basis for $136,454,948;

*

281,825

shares pursuant to the DRP for $2,677,338;

*

546,972

soliciting dealer warrants for $438; and

*

shares pursuant to the exercise of soliciting dealer warrants,

 

and repurchased the following securities for the following amount:

 

 

 

*

(60,475)

shares repurchased pursuant to the share repurchase program for $547,301, for a net total of 13,908,699 shares for $138,584,985 of gross offering proceeds from the initial offering as of January 31, 2001.

As of August 29, 2002, we have sold the following securities in the first follow-on offering for the following aggregate offering prices:

*

50,000,000

shares on a best efforts basis for $497,842,917;

*

1,208,580

shares pursuant to the DRP for $11,481,514;

*

1,999,786

soliciting dealer warrants for $1,600; and

*

shares pursuant to the exercise of soliciting dealer warrants,

 

and repurchased the following securities for the following amount:

 

(182,318)

shares repurchased pursuant to the share repurchase program for $1,719,927, for a net total of 51,026,262 shares for $507,604,504
of gross offering proceeds from the first follow-on offering as of
August 29, 2002.

 25


As of December 31, 2002, we have sold the following securities in the second follow-on offering for the following aggregate offering prices:

*

56,005,766

shares on a best efforts basis for $558,368,022;

*

1,534,732

shares pursuant to the DRP for $14,579,957;

 

2,242,210

soliciting dealer warrants for $1,793; and

*

0

shares pursuant to the exercise of soliciting dealer warrants,

and repurchased the following securities for the following amount:

*

(182,356)

shares purchased pursuant to the share repurchase program for $1,681,265; for a net total of 57,358,142 shares for $571,266,714 of gross offering proceeds from the second follow-on offering as of December 31, 2002.

The net total of shares and gross offering proceeds from all offerings as of December 31, 2002 is 122,293,103 shares for $1,217,456,203. The above-stated number of shares sold and the gross offering proceeds received from such sales do not include the 20,000 shares purchased by the Advisor for $200,000 preceding the commencement of the initial offering. As of December 31, 2002, 4,788,968 soliciting dealer warrants have been issued; and the $3,831 of gross proceeds received for their issuance is not included in the above $1,217,456,203 of gross offering proceeds.

Options to purchase an aggregate of 13,500 shares at an exercise price of $9.05 per share have been granted to the independent directors pursuant to the Independent Director Stock Option Plan. Each director was initially granted options to purchase 3,000 Shares, and subsequently received 500 additional options at each of the three annual meetings. Such options were granted, without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, in reliance upon the exemption from registration in section 4(2) of the Securities Act, as transactions not involving any public offering. None of such options have been exercised. Therefore, no shares have been issued in connection with such options.

From February 11, 1999, which was the effective date of the initial offering through January 31, 2001 or the initial offering cumulative period, we have incurred the following expenses in connection with the issuance and distribution of the registered securities:

Type of Expense

   Amount   

E=Estimated
A=Actual

Underwriting discounts and commissions

$ 11,588,024

A

Finders' fees

--

A

Expenses paid to or for underwriters

--

A

Other expenses to affiliates

920,319

A

Other expenses paid to non-affiliates

  5,038,426

A

Total expenses

$17,546,769

 

The net offering proceeds to us for the initial offering cumulative period, after deducting the total expenses paid described above, are $121,038,216.

26


From February 1, 2001, which was the effective date of the first follow-on offering through August 29, 2002 or the first follow-on offering cumulative period, we have incurred the following expenses in connection with the issuance and distribution of the registered securities:

Type of Expense

 Amount   

E=Estimated
A=Actual

Underwriting discounts and commissions

$ 43,745,069

A

Finders' fees

--

A

Expenses paid to or for underwriters

--

A

Other expenses to affiliates

806,069

A

Other expenses paid to non-affiliates

5,310,940

A

Total expenses

$ 49,862,078

 

The net offering proceeds to us for the first follow-on offering cumulative period, after deducting the total expenses paid as described above, are $457,742,426.

From June 7, 2002, which was the effective date of the second follow-on offering through December 31, 2002 or the second follow-on offering cumulative period, we have incurred the following expenses in connection with the issuance and distribution of the registered securities:

Type of Expense

 Amount   

E=Estimated
A=Actual

Underwriting discounts and commissions

$ 54,057,591

A

Finders' fees

--

A

Expenses paid to or for underwriters

--

A

Other expenses to affiliates

477,607

A

Other expenses paid to non-affiliates

___3,280,414

A

Total expenses

$ 57,815,612

A

The net offering proceeds to us for the second follow-on offering cumulative period, after deducting the total expenses paid as described above, are $513,451,102. The net offering proceeds for all offerings, after deducting total expenses paid as described above, are $1,092,231,744.

The underwriting discounts and commissions, and the expenses paid to or for underwriters, were paid to Inland Securities Corporation. Inland Securities Corporation reallowed all or a portion of the commissions and expenses to soliciting dealers.

Cumulatively, we have used the net offering proceeds as follows:

Use of Proceeds

 Amount   

E=Estimated
A=Actual

Construction of plant, building and facilities

$  11,994,653

A

Purchase of real estate

729,605,386

A

Acquisition of other businesses

--

A

Repayment of indebtedness

176,482,316

A

Working capital (currently)

39,172,245

E

Temporary investments (currently)

134,977,144

A

Other uses

--

A

Of the amount used for purchases of real estate, $10,502,117 was paid to affiliates of the Advisor in connection with the acquisition of properties from such affiliates. Pending purchases of real estate, we temporarily invested net offering proceeds in short-term, interest-bearing accounts.

 27


Item 6. Selected Financial Data

INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000

(not covered by the Independent Auditors' Report)

   

       2002     

       2001     

       2000       

         

Total assets

$

1,767,688,359 

631,587,819 

218,187,913 

         

Mortgages payable

$

675,621,971 

313,499,312 

108,399,911 

         

Total income

$

116,010,766 

37,754,763 

22,123,913 

         

Net income

$

27,495,286 

7,992,643 

2,060,514 

         

Net income per common share, basic and

diluted (a)

$

.39 

.37 

.24 

         

Distributions declared

$

58,061,491 

17,491,342 

6,615,454 

         

Distributions per common share (a)

$

.83 

.81 

.77 

         

Funds From Operations (a)(b)

$

55,374,320 

16,344,942 

6,646,778 

         

Funds available for distribution (b)

$

56,360,237 

17,365,419 

6,649,315 

         

Cash flows provided by operating activities

$

55,594,392 

17,426,634 

5,364,584 

         

Cash flows used in investing activities

$

(851,248,937)

(303,285,568)

(67,068,173)

         

Cash flows provided by financing activities

$

906,097,333 

285,728,779 

71,498,936 

         

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted

 

70,243,809 

21,682,783 

8,590,250 

The above selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this annual report.

  1. The net income and distributions per share are based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. The $.83 per share distributions for the year ended December 31, 2002, represented 105% of our funds from operations or FFO declared and 103% of funds available for distribution for that period. See Footnote (b) below for information regarding our calculation of FFO. Our distributions of our current and accumulated earnings and profits for Federal income tax purposes are taxable to stockholders as ordinary income. Distributions in excess of these earnings and profits generally are treated as a non-taxable reduction of the stockholder's basis in the shares to the extent thereof, and thereafter as taxable gain (a return of capital). These distributions in excess of earnings and profits will have the effect of deferring taxation of the amount of the distributions until the sale of the stockholder's shares. For the year ended December 31, 2002, $21,674,355 (or 37.33% of the $58,061,491 distributions declared for 2002) represented a return of capital. The balance of the distributions constitutes ordinary income. In order to maintain its qualification as a REIT, we must make annual distributions to stockholders of at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, or approximately $32,741,000 for 2002. REIT taxable income does not include net capital gains. Under certain circumstances, we may be required to make distributions in excess of cash available for distribution in order to meet the REIT distribution requirements. Distributions are determined by our Board of Directors and are dependent on a number of factors, including the amount of funds available for distribution, our financial condition, any decision by the Board of Directors to reinvest funds rather than to distribute the funds, our capital expenditures, the annual distribution required to maintain REIT status under the Code, and other factors the Board of Directors may deem relevant.
  2. 28


  3. One of our objectives is to provide cash distributions to our stockholders from cash generated by our operations. Cash generated from operations is not equivalent to our net operating income as determined under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP"). Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate companies, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts or NAREIT, an industry trade group, has promulgated a standard known as "Funds from Operations" or "FFO" for short, which it believes more accurately reflects the operating performance of a REIT such as us. As defined by NAREIT, FFO means net income computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains (or losses) from debt restructuring and sales of property, plus depreciation on real property and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures in which the REIT holds an interest. We have adopted the NAREIT definition for computing FFO because management believes that, subject to the following limitations, FFO provides a basis for comparing our performance and operations to those of other REITs. The calculation of FFO may vary from entity to entity since capitalization and expense policies tend to vary from entity to entity. Items which are capitalized do not impact FFO, whereas items that are expensed reduce FFO. Consequently, our presentation of FFO may not be comparable to other similarly-titled measures presented by other REITs. FFO is not intended to be an alternative to "Net Income" as an indicator of our performance nor to "Cash Flows from Operating Activities" as determined by GAAP as a measure of our capacity to pay distributions. "Funds Available for Distribution" or "FAD" for short, means excluding from FFO normalized recurring real estate related expenditures and other non-cash items. We believe that FFO is a better measure of our operating performance because FFO excludes non-cash items from GAAP net income. This allows us to compare our relative property performance to determine our return on capital. Management used the calculation of FFO for several reasons. We use FFO to compare our performance to that of other REITs in our peer group. Additionally, we use FFO in conjunction with our acquisition policy to determine investment capitalization strategy. We feel FAD is a useful tool to assist our stockholders in their review and determination of dividend coverage, i.e. that we pay our distribution from our cash generated from operations and not from other capital sources. FFO and FAD are calculated as follows:

   

2002

 

2001

 

2000

Net income

$

27,495,286 

$

7,992,643 

$

2,060,514 

Depreciation

 

26,602,045 

 

8,324,023 

 

4,581,748 

Amortization related to investment properties

 

        1,276,989

 

28,276

 

 4,516

Funds from operations (1)

 

55,374,320 

 

16,344,942 

 

6,646,778 

             

Principal amortization of debt

 

(344,216)

 

(257,199)

 

(237,561)

Straight-line rental income (2)

 

(2,212,907)

 

(746,929)

 

(493,180)

Interest costs capitalized on development
  projects

 

(444,891)

 

(116,648)

 

--

Income received under master lease
  agreements and principal escrow (3)

 

1,780,102 

 

      1,675,983 

 

         418,638 

Acquisition cost expenses (4)

 

350,260 

 

164,788 

 

148,494 

Amortization of Loan fees

 

1,516,363 

 

300,482

 

166,146

Net amortization of above and below market
lease costs

 

        205,206 

 

              --

 

                --

             

Funds available for distribution

$

56,360,237

$

17,365,419 

$

6,649,315

   

=========

 

=========

 

=========

 29


  1. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities calculated in accordance with GAAP and is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs. FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income as an indicator of our operating performance or as an alternative to cash flow as a measure of liquidity.
  2. Certain tenant leases contain provisions providing for stepped rent increases. GAAP requires us to record rental income for the period of occupancy using the effective monthly rent, which is the average monthly rent for the entire period of occupancy during the term of the lease.
  3. As part of certain purchases, we receive payments under master lease agreements pertaining to some spaces which were not producing rent at the time of the purchase. Periods covered range from one to three years after the date of the purchase or until the spaces are leased. In addition, we received payments from other escrow arrangements. GAAP requires that upon receipt, these payments are to be recorded as a reduction in the purchase price of the properties rather than as rental income. On certain properties purchased, we received rental prorations relating to periods prior to the purchase date. GAAP also requires that these amounts be recorded as a reduction in the purchase price of the properties rather than as rental income.
  4. Acquisition cost expenses include costs and expenses relating to the acquisition of properties. These costs were estimated to be up to .5% of the gross offering proceeds and are paid from the proceeds of the offerings.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis compares the year ended December 31, 2002 to the years ended December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000. You should read the following discussion and analysis along with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in this report and in our consolidated financial statements and the related notes. Certain statements in this "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Federal Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. See "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements."

 

Overview

We were formed, on September 3, 1998, to acquire and manage a diversified portfolio of real estate, primarily multi-tenant shopping centers. We have been operating and intend to continue operating as a real estate investment trust or REIT for Federal and state income tax purposes. We, through entities owned or controlled directly or indirectly by us, have initially focused on acquiring properties in the southeastern states, primarily Florida, Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina. We have begun to acquire and plan to continue acquiring properties in the mid-Atlantic and Northeastern states. We may also, through entities owned or controlled directly or indirectly by us, acquire single-user retail properties in locations throughout the United States, some of which may be sale and leaseback transactions, net leased to creditworthy tenants. Inland Retail Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc. or our Advisor has been retained to manage, for a fee, our day-to-day affairs, subject to the supervision of our Board of Directors.

The terrorist attacks that occurred in the United States on September 11, 2001 caused periodic major instability in the United States and other financial markets. Possible further acts of terrorism and current and future war risks could have a similar impact. The United States continues to take military action against terrorism and has initiated a military action with Iraq. Terrorist attacks and military conflict in the Middle East may lead to additional armed hostilities or to further acts of terrorism and civil disturbance in the United States or elsewhere, which may further contribute to economic instability. Any such attacks could, among other things, cause further instability in financial markets and could directly or indirectly negatively affect our tenants or properties and their operations and our profitability.

Many of our properties are located in the southeastern states. During 2002, as throughout the nation, the southeastern market experienced the economic slowdown. The local southeastern economies have been further impacted by the continued slowdown in airline travel and tourism. We believe that the effects of a continuing economic downturn should be mitigated by the fact that the tenants at our properties, to a large extent, consist of: (1) retailers who serve primary non-discretionary shopping needs, such as grocers and pharmacies; (2) discount chains that can compete well during an economic downturn; and (3) national tenants with strong credit ratings that can withstand a downturn. The length and severity of any economic downturn cannot be predicted. Our operations could be negatively impacted to the extent that an economic downturn is prolonged or becomes more severe. The Kmart bankruptcy may negatively impact three of the four Kmart leased properties. The lease terms pertaining to the three Kmart stores anticipated to close in April 2003, represents approximately 1.8% of the gross leasable area of the properties or GLA and approximately 1.0% of the properties rental income as of March 18, 2003. We believe that the diversification of creditworthy tenants provides additional mitigation of risks. As of March 18, 2003, the largest tenant, Publix, in the portfolio comprises approximately 8% of the properties GLA and approximately 5.6% of the properties rental income.

30


As of December 31, 2002, our operating partnership owned a portfolio of 106 properties, has agreements with unaffiliated third parties to develop six land parcels and made five loans totaling $100,975,000 to unaffiliated third parties secured by mortgages on 22 properties. Each of the properties is a shopping center located in Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, Tennessee, Alabama, Louisiana, Maryland and Texas, and containing an aggregate of approximately 13,550,700 square feet of GLA. As of December 31, 2002, approximately 97% of GLA in the properties was leased.

Critical Accounting Policies

General.

The following disclosure pertains to critical accounting policies we believe are most "critical" to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations which require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments. These judgments often result from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Critical accounting policies discussed in this section are not to be confused with accounting principles and methods disclosed in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States or GAAP. GAAP requires information in financial statements about accounting principles, methods used and disclosures pertaining to significant estimates. This discussion addresses our judgment pertaining to trends, events or uncertainties known which were taken into consideration upon the application of those policies and the likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported upon taking into consideration different conditions and assumptions.

Valuation and Allocation of Investment Property. In order to ascertain the value of an investment property, we take into consideration many factors which require difficult, subjective, or complex judgments to be made. These judgments require us to make assumptions when valuing each investment property. Such assumptions include projecting vacancy rates, rental rates, property operating expenses, capital expenditures, and debt financing rates, among other assumptions. The capitalization rate is also a significant driving factor in determining the property valuation which requires judgment of factors such as market knowledge, historical experience, length of leases, tenant financial strength, economy, demographics, environment, property location, visibility, age, and physical condition, and investor return requirements, among others. Furthermore, at the acquisition date, we require that every property acquired is supported by an independent appraisal. All of the aforementioned factors are taken as a whole in determining the valuation. The valuation is sensitive to the actual results of any these uncertain factors, either individually or taken as a whole. Should the actual results differ from our judgment, the valuation could be negatively effected.

We allocate the purchase price of the each acquired investment property between land, building and improvements, acquired above market and below market leases, lease origination value (the market cost avoidance of executing each acquired lease), and any assumed financing that is determined to be above or below market terms. The allocation of the purchase price is an area that requires judgment and significant estimates. We use the information contained in the independent appraisal obtained at acquisition as the primary basis for the allocation to land and building and improvements. We determine whether any financing assumed is above or below market based upon comparison to similar financing terms for similar investment properties. We also allocate a portion of the purchase price to the estimated acquired in-place lease origination costs based on estimated lease execution costs for similar leases and we consider various factors including geographic location and size of leased space. We also evaluate each acquired lease based upon current market rates at the acquisition date and we consider various factors including geographical location, size and location of leased space within the investment property, tenant profile, and the credit risk of the tenant in determining whether the acquired lease is above or below market lease costs. After an acquired lease is determined to be above or below market lease costs, we allocate a portion of the purchase price to such above or below acquired lease costs based upon the present value of the difference between the contractual lease rate and the estimated market rate. The determination of the discount rate used in the present value calculation is based upon the "risk free rate." This discount rate is a significant factor in determining the market valuation which requires our judgment of subjective factors such as market knowledge, economic, demographics, location, visibility, location, age and physical condition of the property.

31


On a quarterly basis, we conduct an impairment analysis in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 or FAS 144 to ensure that the property's carrying value does not exceed its fair value. If this were to occur, we are required to record an impairment loss.

The valuation and allocation of purchase price, and possible subsequent impairment of investment properties, is a significant estimate that can and does change based on our continuous process of analyzing each property and reviewing assumptions about uncertain inherent factors, as well as the economic condition of the property at a particular point in time.

Cost Capitalization and Depreciation Policies. Our policy is to review all expenses paid and capitalize any items exceeding $5,000.00 which were deemed to be an upgrade or a tenant improvement. These costs are capitalized and are included in the investment properties classification as an asset to Buildings and improvements. In addition, we capitalize costs incurred during the development period, including direct costs and indirect costs such as construction, insurance, architectural costs, legal fees, interest and other financing costs, and real estate taxes. We cease capitalization of indirect costs once we consider the property to be substantially complete and available for occupancy. It is our judgment that when the anchor tenant receives its certificate of occupancy or when over 60% of the tenants receive their certificate of occupancy, the development is deemed to be substantially complete.

Buildings and improvements are depreciated on a straight-line basis based upon estimated useful lives of 30 years for buildings and improvements and 15 years for site improvements. The portion of the purchase price allocated to acquired above market costs and acquired below market costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the related lease as an adjustment to net rental income. Acquired in-place lease origination costs, other leasing costs, and tenant improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the related lease as a component of amortization expense.

On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS 141 and SFAS 142. The adoption of these standards resulted in the recognition upon acquisition of additional intangible assets and liabilities relating to the Company's 2002 real estate acquisitions. The portion of the purchase price allocated to acquired above market lease costs and acquired below market lease costs are amortized on a straight line basis over the life of the related lease as an adjustment to rental income. This allocation was applied to 84 properties acquired. Amortization pertaining to the above market lease costs of $953,493 was applied as a reduction to rental income for the year ending December 31, 2002. Amortization pertaining to the below market lease costs of $748,287 was applied as an increase to rental income for the year ending December 31, 2002. The table below presents the amortization during the next five years related to the acquired above market lease costs and the below market lease costs for properties owned at December 31, 2002:

Amortization of:

 

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Thereafter

               

Acquired above

             

Market lease costs

 

$(1,876,352)

$(1,691,407)

$(1,506,903)

$(1,298,195)

$(1,056,556)

$(3,942,430)

               

Acquired below

             

Market lease costs

 

2,038,465

1,726,436

1,354,318

1,065,255

763,362

2,998,188

               

Net Rental Income

             

Increase / (Decrease)

 

$162,114

$35,029

$(152,585)

$(232,940)

$(293,194)

$(944,242)

The portion of the purchase price allocated to acquired in-place lease origination costs are amortized on a straight line basis over the life of the related lease. This allocation was applied to 84 properties acquired. We incurred amortization expense pertaining to acquired in-place lease origination costs of $1,206,324 for the year ending December 31, 2002.

Cost capitalization and the estimate of useful lives requires our judgment and includes significant estimates that can and do change based on our process which periodically analyzes each property and on our assumptions about uncertain inherent factors.

32


Revenue recognition. We recognize rental income on a straight-line basis over the term of each lease. The difference between rental income earned on a straight-line basis and the cash rent due under the provisions of the lease agreements is recorded as deferred rent receivable and is included as a component of accounts and rents receivable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. We anticipate collecting these amounts over the terms of the leases as scheduled rent payments are made.

Reimbursements from tenants for recoverable real estate tax and operating expenses are accrued as revenue in the period the applicable expenditures are incurred. We make certain assumptions and judgments in estimating the reimbursements at the end of each reporting period. Should the actual results differ from our judgment, the estimated reimbursement could be negatively effected and would be adjusted appropriately.

In conjunction with certain acquisitions, we receive payments under master lease agreements pertaining to non-revenue producing spaces either at the time of or subsequent to the purchase. GAAP requires that as these payments are received, they be recorded as a reduction in the purchase price rather than as rental income. These master leases were established at the time of purchase in order to mitigate the potential negative effects of rent and occupancy assumptions used in the valuation of the investment property. Master lease payments are received through a draw of funds escrowed at the time of purchase and are for a period from one to three years. There is no assurance that upon the expiration of the master lease agreements, the valuation factors, assumed by us, pertaining to rent and occupancy will be met. Should the actual results differ from our judgment, the property valuation could be negatively or positively effected.

Valuation of accounts and rents receivable. We take into consideration certain factors that require judgments to be made as to the collectability of receivables. Collectability factors taken into consideration are the amounts outstanding, payment history, and financial strength of the tenant, which taken as a whole determines the valuation. There is no assurance that assumptions made by us will be met. Should the actual collection results differ from our judgment, the property valuation could be negatively or positively effected.

REIT status. In order to maintain our status as a REIT, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders. We must also meet certain asset and income tests, as well as other requirements. We monitor the business and transactions that may potentially impact our REIT status. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to Federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates.

Notes Receivable. We have entered into various notes receivable with unaffiliated third parties. The notes receivable are generally secured by a first mortgage on the underlying real estate as well as personal guarantees by the borrower. The underlying real estate may be in the process of being developed and leased or may be fully operational. Additionally, we typically enter into options to acquire the underlying real estate subject to certain conditions including lease-up parameters and other due diligence. The classification of such instruments as notes receivable versus investment in real estate is an area that is subjective in nature. On a quarterly basis we individually evaluate each note receivable to ascertain whether the facts and circumstances that supported our initial classification have changed.

33


In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No. 51 which provides new accounting guidance on when to consolidate a variable interest, as defined in the Interpretation. The Interpretation applies immediately to variable interests in variable interest entities created or obtained after January 31, 2003. The Interpretation required certain disclosures in the financial statements as of December 31, 2002 if it is reasonably possible that we will consolidate or disclose information about variable interest entities when the Interpretation becomes effective.

We have accounted for fundings to borrowers for the development or purchase of investment properties as development receivables or mortgage receivables, respectively. Because of the amounts funded in relation to the equity investment of the borrower in the underlying property, it is reasonably possible that we will be required to consolidate or disclose additional information with regards to the underlying investment properties' financial position when the statement becomes effective. Our maximum exposure to loss as a result of the notes receivable would be the amount of the receivable balance outstanding at December 31, 2002 less amounts paid after year end which amounts to approximately $48,000,000.

Valuation of investments in securities. We review securities for declines in market value below cost which would indicate the need for further analysis regarding possible impairment. Other factors are incorporated into the analysis, including the overall security issuer's performance, dividends received on the security, and various other market influences. Based on this analysis, any impairment is realized as a loss which is charged to earnings, with a new cost basis established for the security.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

General.

Our principal demands for funds have been for property acquisitions, either directly or through investment interests, for the payment of operating expenses and dividends, and for the payment of interest on outstanding indebtedness and other investments. Generally, cash needs for items other than property acquisitions have been met from operations, and property acquisitions have been funded by public offerings of our shares of common stock. However, there may be a delay between the sale of the shares and our purchase of properties, which may result in a delay in the benefits to investors of returns generated from property operations. The Advisor evaluates potential additional property acquisitions and Inland Real Estate Acquisitions, Inc., one of the affiliates of our sponsor, engages in negotiations with sellers on our behalf. Investors should be aware, that after a purchase contract is executed which contains specific terms, the property will not be purchased until due diligence, which includes review of the title insurance commitment, an appraisal and an environmental analysis, is successfully completed. In some instances, the proposed acquisition still requires the negotiation of final binding agreements, which may include financing documents. During this period, we may decide to temporarily invest any unused proceeds from the offering in certain investments that could yield lower returns than other investments, such as the properties. These lower returns may affect our ability to make distributions.

Potential future sources of capital include proceeds from the public or private offering of our debt or equity securities, secured or unsecured financings from banks or other lenders, proceeds from the sale of properties, as well as undistributed funds from operations. We anticipate that during the current year we will (i) acquire additional existing shopping centers, (ii) develop additional shopping center sites and (iii) continue to pay distributions to stockholders, and each is expected to be funded mainly from proceeds of our public offerings of shares, cash flows from operating activities, financings and other external capital resources available to us.

Our leases typically provide that the tenant bears responsibility for substantially all property costs and expenses associated with ongoing maintenance and operation, including utilities, property taxes and insurance. In addition, in some instances our leases provide that the tenant is responsible for roof and structural repairs. Certain of our properties are subject to leases under which we retain responsibility for certain costs and expenses associated with the property. We anticipate that capital demands to meet obligations related to capital improvements with respect to properties will be minimal for the foreseeable future and can be met with funds from operations and working capital.

34


If necessary, we may use financings or other sources of capital in the event of unforeseen significant capital expenditures.

We believe that our current capital resources (including cash on hand) and anticipated financings are sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future.

 

Liquidity

Offerings. On February 11, 1999, we commenced an initial public offering on a best efforts basis of up to (i) 50,000,000 shares of common stock to the public at a price of $10.00 per share, (ii) 4,000,000 shares to participants in our distribution reinvestment program or DRP at a price of $9.50 per share, (iii) 2,000,000 soliciting dealer warrants issuable to Inland Securities Corporation, the managing dealer, at the rate of one soliciting dealer warrant (for a price of $.0008 per warrant) for each 25 shares sold during the initial offering, and (iv) 2,000,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of the soliciting dealer warrants issued during the initial offering at a price of $12.00 per share. The initial offering terminated on January 31, 2001 and a total of 13,687,349 shares were sold to the public resulting in gross proceeds of $136,454,648. As of January 31, 2001, we had repurchased 60,475 shares for $547,301 pursuant to the share repurchase program or SRP. In addition, the Advisor purchased 20,000 shares for $200,000 preceding the commencement of the initial offering.

On February 1, 2001, we commenced a follow-on public offering, our  first follow-on offering, on a best efforts basis of up to (i) 50,000,000 additional shares at a price of $10.00 per share, (ii) 4,000,000 additional shares pursuant to the DRP at a price of $9.50 per share, (iii) 2,000,000 soliciting dealer warrants, and (iv) 2,000,000 shares issuable upon exercise of the soliciting dealer warrants, all on substantially the same terms as in the initial offering. The first follow-on offering expired on February 1, 2002, but was extended by us to a date no later than February 1, 2003. As of August 29, 2002, we had sold 50,000,000 shares from our first follow-on offering resulting in gross proceeds of $497,842,917, and had repurchased 182,318 shares for $1,719,927 pursuant to the share repurchase program, thereby completing the first follow-on offering.

On June 7, 2002, concurrent with the first follow-on offering, we commenced a second follow-on public offering on a best efforts basis of up to (i) 150,000,000 additional shares at a price of $10.00 per share, (ii) 12,000,000 additional shares pursuant to the DRP at a price of $9.50 per share, (iii) 6,000,000 soliciting dealer warrants, and (iv) 6,000,000 shares issuable upon exercise of the soliciting dealer warrants, all on substantially the same terms in the initial offering. As of March 18, 2003 we have received subscriptions for a total of 83,526,940 shares sold from the second follow-on offering resulting in gross proceeds of $825,622,583 and repurchased 308,733 shares for $2,887,606 pursuant to the share repurchase program. As a result, we could sell another 66,473,060 shares in the second follow-on offering. Collectively the initial offering, first follow-on offering and second follow-on offering are referred to as our offerings.

As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, subscriptions for a total of 119,713,115 and 35,294,860 shares, respectively, had been received from the public, which include the 20,000 shares issued to the Advisor. In addition, we distributed 3,025,137 and 785,365 shares pursuant to our DRP as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. As of December 31, 2002 we have repurchased 425,159 shares and have issued soliciting dealer warrants to acquire 4,788,968 shares. As a result of such sales and repurchases, we have received a net total of $1,188,917,394 of gross offering proceeds as of December 31, 2002. Our Advisor has guaranteed payment of all public offering expenses (excluding selling commissions, the marketing contribution and the due diligence expense allowance) in excess of 5.5% of the gross offering proceeds from the offerings or all organization and offering expenses (including selling commissions) which together exceeds 15% of the gross offering proceeds. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, organizational and offering costs totaling $125,224,459 and $39,335,560, respectively, did not exceed these limitations. These costs did not exceed such limitations upon completion of the initial offering and first follow-on offering and we anticipate that these costs will not exceed these limitations upon completion of the second follow-on offering. Any excess amounts at the completion of the second follow-on offering will be reimbursed by our Advisor.

As of December 31, 2002, 4,788,968 soliciting dealer warrants were sold to the managing dealer for a total of $3,831 and none of the soliciting dealer warrants had been exercised for shares.

35


Line of Credit. On December 20, 2001, we secured an acquisition line of credit in the amount of $14,000,000 with SouthTrust Bank. This line of credit had a maturity date of March 27, 2002, extended to March 27, 2004 and carries interest at the rate of 1.75% over LIBOR per annum. The funds from this line of credit were used to purchase a property in December 2001, and were subsequently repaid. This line of credit is secured by second mortgages on three properties owned by us which also have first mortgages with this bank. In addition, we have signed an application for a $100 million equity line of credit with Key Bank. It is anticipated these funds will become available under this line in late March, 2003.

Stockholder Liquidity. We provide the following programs to facilitate investment in the shares and to provide limited liquidity for stockholders until such time as a market for the shares develops:

The DRP allows stockholders who purchase shares pursuant to the offerings to automatically reinvest distributions by purchasing additional shares from us. Such purchases will not be subject to selling commissions or the marketing contribution and due diligence expense allowance and will be sold at a price of $9.50 per share. As of December 31, 2002, we distributed 3,025,137 shares pursuant to the DRP for an aggregate of $28,738,809.

Subject to certain restrictions, the share repurchase program provides existing stockholders with limited, interim liquidity by enabling them to sell shares back to us at the following prices

    • One year from the purchase date, at $9.25 per share;
    • Two years from the purchase date, at $9.50 per share;
    • Three years from the purchase date, at $9.75 per share; and
    • Four years from the purchase date, at $10.00 per share, or a price equal to 10 times our "funds

available for distribution" per weighted average shares outstanding for the prior calendar year.

Shares purchased by us will not be available for resale. As of December 31, 2002, 425,149 shares have been repurchased for an aggregate cost of $3,948,493.

Capital Resources

We expect to meet our short-term operating liquidity requirements generally through our net cash provided by property operations. We also expect that our properties will generate sufficient cash flow to cover our operating expenses plus pay a monthly distribution on weighted average shares. Operating cash flows are expected to increase as additional properties are added to our portfolio.

We believe that we should leverage our properties at approximately 50% of their value. We also believe that we can borrow at the lowest overall cost of funds by placing individual financing on each of our properties. Accordingly, mortgage loans have generally been placed on each property at the time that the property is purchased, or shortly thereafter, with the property securing the financing.

The majority of our loans require monthly payments of interest only, although some loans require principal and interest payments as well as reserves for taxes, insurance, and certain other costs. Interest on variable-rate loans are currently based on LIBOR plus a spread ranging from 150 to 185 basis points. Fixed-rate loans bear interest based on corresponding treasury instruments plus a spread of 130 to 175 basis points. Variable-rate loans may be prepaid without penalty, while fixed-rate loans may be prepaid with a penalty after specific lockout periods.

During 2002, we closed on or assumed debt with a principal amount of $538,604,975 and retired debt in the amount of $176,482,316. The average cost of funds for 2002 was approximately 5.3%. We also maintain two lines of credit in the aggregate amount of $64 million, of which no funds were outstanding as of December 31, 2002. We have drawn $62,899,900 as of March 18, 2003 from these lines to acquire properties.

36


Although the loans we acquired are generally non-recourse, occasionally, when it is deemed to be advantageous, we may guarantee all or a portion of the debt on a full-recourse basis. At times, we have borrowed funds financed as part of a cross-collateralized package, with cross-default provisions, in order to enhance the financial benefits. In those circumstances, one or more of our properties may secure the debt of another of our properties.

Individual decisions regarding interest rates, loan-to-value, fixed versus variable-rate financing, maturity dates and related matters are often based on the condition of the financial markets at the time the debt is incurred, which conditions may vary from time to time.

Distributions are determined by our Board of Directors and are dependent on a number of factors, including the amount of funds available for distribution, our financial condition, any decision by our Board of Directors to reinvest funds rather than to distribute the funds, our capital expenditures, the annual distribution required to maintain REIT status under the Internal Revenue Code and other factors the Board of Directors may deem relevant.

Cash Flows From Operating Activities

Net cash generated from operating activities was $55,594,392, $17,426,634 and $5,364,584 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to prior years is due primarily to the additional rental revenues and income generated from the operations of 39 properties owned at the beginning of the year plus 67 properties purchased during the year ended December 31, 2002, compared to the rental revenues and income generated from the operations of 12 properties owned for the entire year ended December 30, 2001 plus 27 properties purchased during 2001.

As of March 18, 2003, we had approximately $184,000,000 available for investment in additional properties. As of March 18, 2003 we are considering the acquisition of approximately $900,000,000 in properties. We are currently in the process of obtaining financings on properties which have been purchased, as well as certain of the properties which we anticipate purchasing. It is our intention to finance each of our acquisitions either at closing or subsequent to closing. As a result of the intended financings and based on our experience in raising money in our current offering, we believe that we will have sufficient resources to acquire these properties.

Cash Flows From Investing Activities

Cash flows used in investing activities were $851,248,937, $303,285,568 and $67,068,173 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The cash flows used in investing activities were primarily due to the acquisition of 67, 27, and three properties for approximately $733,178,000, $292,700,000, and $64,700,000 during the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000.

Our investment in securities at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 consists principally of equity investments in various real estate investment trusts and energy related trusts and are classified as available-for-sale securities, recorded at fair value. We purchased investment securities in the year ended December 31, 2002 in the amount of approximately $1,100,000, increasing our margin account by approximately $240,000. We purchased investment securities of approximately $5,200,000 and increased our margin account by approximately $2,800,000 for the same period in 2001. We purchased investment securities of approximately $1,300,000 and increased our margin account by approximately $400,000 for 2000.

In 2003, we anticipate that construction costs related to several development projects which were in progress as of December 31, 2002 as well as others which will commence in 2003. The expected aggregate costs to be paid related to the projects in process at December 31, 2002 are approximately $25,000,000, of which approximately $11,088,000 had been incurred as of December 31, 2002.

37


Cash Flows From Financing Activities

Cash provided by financing activities was $906,097,333, $285,728,779 and $71,498,936 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. We generated proceeds from the sale of shares, net of offering costs and the repurchase of shares, of approximately $775,314,000, $206,250,000, and $62,810,000 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000. We also generated approximately $367,800,000, $104,800,000, and $37,800,000 from the issuance of new mortgages secured by 43, 33, and three of our properties for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000. We paid approximately $52,160,000, $15,960,000, and $6,100,000 in dividends to our stockholders for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000. The increased capital balances and increased dividend rate from $.75 per Share to $.83 per Share over the three years ended December 31, 2002 resulted in the increases in dividends declared. We also used approximately $176,500,000, $6,980,000 and $22,500,000 for the paydown of 11, one, and nine mortgages secured by our properties for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000.

Given the current size of our offerings, as of March 18, 2003, we could raise approximately $665,000,000 in additional capital. However, there can be no assurance that we will raise this amount of money or that we will be able to acquire additional attractive properties.

We are exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of our long-term debt used to maintain liquidity and fund capital expenditures and expansion of our real estate investment portfolio and operations. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. To achieve our objectives we borrow primarily at fixed rates or variable rates with the lowest margins available and, in some cases, with the ability to convert variable rates to current market fixed rates at the time of conversion.

Our interest rate risk is monitored using a variety of techniques. The table below presents the principal amounts and weighted average interest rates by year and expected maturity to evaluate the expected cash flows and sensitivity to interest rate changes.

 

  2003  

  2004  

  2005  

  2006  

  2007  

 Thereafter 

             

Maturing debt:

           

  Fixed rate debt

$11,854,108

$1,034,419

$28,659,792

$43,535,808

$ 66,541,345

$266,995,569

  Variable rate debt

18,681,521

--

5,000,000

29,337,500

168,006,909

35,975,000

             

Average interest rate on debt:

           

  Fixed rate debt

7.62%

7.51%

7.57%

6.80%

6.75%

6.21%

  Variable rate debt

3.75%

N/A   

3.03%

3.20%

3.25%

3.17%

Approximately $257,000,000, or 38%, of our mortgages payable at December 31, 2002 have variable interest rates averaging 3.27%. An increase in the variable interest rate on certain mortgages payable constitutes a market risk. If interest rates increase by 1%, based on debt outstanding as of March 18, 2003, interest expense increases by $2,570,000 on an annual basis.

As we continue to raise capital and acquire properties, matching our capital sources and uses is an important aspect of our business. As of March 18, 2003, we are considering the acquisition of $900,000,000 of properties. As of March 18, 2003, we have approximately $184,000,000 in cash available to acquire properties. We believe these funds, together with capital to be raised, anticipated borrowings under available credit lines and other borrowings will be sufficient to fund these proposed acquisitions.

 38


Effects of Transactions with Related and Certain Other Parties

Services Provided by Affiliates of the Advisor As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, we had incurred $125,224,459 and $39,335,560 of offering costs, of which $111,594,678 and $30,981,962 was paid to affiliates. In accordance with the terms of the offerings, the Advisor has guaranteed payment of all public offering expenses (excluding sales commissions and the marketing contribution and the due diligence expense allowance) in excess of 5.5% of the gross proceeds of the offerings or gross offering proceeds or all organization and offering expenses (including selling commissions) which together exceed 15% of gross offering proceeds. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, offering costs did not exceed the 5.5% and 15% limitations. We anticipate that these costs will not exceed these limitations upon completion of the second follow-on offering. Any excess amounts at the completion of the second follow-on offering will be reimbursed by the Advisor.

The Advisor and its affiliates are entitled to reimbursement for salaries and expenses of employees of the Advisor and its affiliates relating to the offerings. In addition, an affiliate of the Advisor is entitled to receive selling commissions, and the marketing contribution and due diligence expense allowance from us in connection with the offerings. Such costs are offset against the stockholders' equity accounts. Such costs totaled $ 79,614,867, $19,287,730 and $6,907,685 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, of which $1,309,885 and $773,191 was unpaid at December 31, 2002, and 2001.

The Advisor and its affiliates are entitled to reimbursement for general and administrative expenses of the Advisor and its affiliates relating to our administration. Such costs are included in general and administrative expenses to affiliates, professional services to affiliates, and acquisition cost expenses to affiliates, in addition to costs that were capitalized pertaining to property acquisitions. During the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 we incurred $1,702,748, $538,306 and $257,840 of these costs, of which $515,204 and $332,831 remained unpaid as of December 31, 2002 and 2001.

An affiliate of the Advisor provides loan servicing to us for an annual fee. Such costs are incurred in property operating expenses to affiliates. The agreement allows for annual fees totaling .05% of the first $100,000,000 in mortgage balance outstanding and .03% of the remaining mortgage balance, payable monthly. Such fees totaled $ 145,085, $59,469 and $48,322 in the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000.

The Advisor has contributed $200,000 to our capital for which it received 20,000 shares.

We used the services of an affiliate of the Advisor to facilitate the mortgage financing that we obtained on some of the properties purchased. Such costs are capitalized as loan fees and amortized over the respective loan term. During the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 we paid loan fees totaling $ 477,274, $177,436 and $23,438, to this affiliate.

39


We pay an advisor asset management fee of not more than 1% of our net asset value. Our net asset value is defined as the total book value of our assets invested in equity interests and loans receivable secured by real estate, before reserves for depreciation, reserves for bad debt or other similar non-cash reserves, reduced by any mortgages payable on the respective assets. We compute our net asset value by taking the average of these values at the end of each month for which we are calculating the fee. The fee is payable quarterly in an amount equal to 1/4 of 1% of net asset value as of the last day of the immediately preceding quarter. For any year in which we qualify as a REIT, our advisor must reimburse us for the following amounts if any: (1) the amounts by which our total operating expenses, the sum of the advisor asset management fee plus other operating expenses, paid during the previous fiscal year exceed the greater of: (i) 2% of our average invested assets for that fiscal year. (Average invested assets is the average of the total book value of our assets invested in equity interest and loans secured by real estate, before depreciation, reserve for bad debt or other similar non-cash reserves. We will compute the average invested assets by taking the average of these values at the end of each month for which we are calculating the fee), or (ii) 25% of our net income, before any additions to or allowances for reserves, depreciation, amortization, bad debts or other similar non-cash reserves and before any gain from the sale of our assets, for that fiscal year; plus (2) an amount, which will not exceed the advisor asset management fee for that year, equal to any difference between the total amount of distributions to stockholders for that year and a 7% minimum annual return on the net investment of stockholders. For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 we incurred $ 5,293,000, none and $120,000 of asset management fees, of which $2,000,000 was unpaid at December 31, 2002. We neither paid nor accrued such fees, for the year ended December 31, 2001 because the Advisor indicated that it would forego such fees.

The property managers, entities owned principally by individuals who are affiliates of the Advisor, are entitled to receive property management fees totaling 4.5% of gross operating income, for management and leasing services. We incurred and paid property management fees of $4,870,084, $1,605,492 and $926,978 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000. None remained unpaid as of December 31, 2002 and 2001.

Related Party Transactions. In December 2001 and January 2002, an affiliate of the Advisor guaranteed the mortgages payable pertaining to Douglasville Pavilion, Southlake Pavilion, Fayetteville Pavilion, and Sarasota Pavilion, all of which matured in July 2002. We agreed to pay the affiliate 1/8% per annum of the guaranteed amount for providing such a guarantee. As of December 31, 2002, $56,639 of guarantee fees had been incurred, of which none remained unpaid at December 31, 2002. All of the respective mortgages payable were paid off in June 2002.

 40


Results of Operations

General

The following discussion is based primarily on our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000. The schedule excludes the following development projects: Blockbuster at Citrus Hills, Shoppes at Chalet Suzanne, Eckerd Drug Store-Gaffney, Eckerd Drug Store-Perry Creek, Southampton Village and Southwood Plantation.

Quarter Ended

Properties Purchased per Quarter

Square Feet Acquired

Purchase Price

March 31, 1999

None

N/A   

N/A   

June 30, 1999

2

336,746

$     20,298,291

September 30, 1999

5

803,169

80,426,866

December 31, 1999

2

302,602

26,490,171

March 31, 2000

1

117,723

8,547,758

June 30, 2000

1

282,137

34,332,135

September 30, 2000

1

231,326

20,928,655

December 31, 2000

0

N/A   

N/A   

March 31, 2001

4

366,095

37,123,001

June 30, 2001

6

525,279

64,513,807

September 30, 2001

3

379,569

33,864,561

December 31, 2001

14

2,496,876

267,613,756

March 31, 2002

9

1,239,771

136,394,927

June 30, 2002

15

1,783,398

177,023,351

September 30, 2002

12

1,231,910

159,865,564

December 31, 2002

31

  3,454,085

    424,672,664

Total

106

13,550,686

$1,492,095,507

 

====

========

===========

Rental Income. Rental income consists of basic monthly rent and percentage rental income due pursuant to tenant leases. Rental income increased to $90,974,084 for the year ended December 31, 2002 from $28,247,886 and $16,349,483 for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000. This increase is due primarily to 106 properties owned and operated throughout the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to 39 and 12 properties for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000.

Real Estate Tax Recovery, Common Area Cost Recovery and Additional Rental Income. Real estate tax recovery, common area cost recovery and additional rental income consist of property operating expenses recovered from the tenants including real estate taxes, property management fees and insurance. Additional rental income increased to $20,537,164 for the year ended December 31, 2002 from $7,025,345 and $4,734,088 for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000. This increase is due primarily to 106 properties owned and operated throughout the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to 39 and 12 properties for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000.

Interest and Dividend Income. Interest and dividend income consists of interest earned from short term investments and investments in securities that are held by us. Interest and dividend income increased to $4,411,158 for the year ended December 31, 2002 from $2,103,810 and $845,013 for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000. This results primarily from increases in income and dividends from investment in securities, as well as interest earned on mortgage notes receivable funded throughout 2002 of approximately $100 million. This increase was offset by decreases in the interest rates of the short term instruments that we invest in, as well as the reduction of interest earned on a $1.1 million second mortgage receivable outstanding throughout 2001, which was repaid in January 2002.

41


Other Income. Other income decreased to $88,360 for the year ended December 31, 2002 from $377,722 and $195,329 for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000. This decrease is due to the losses realized on the sale of investment securities as well as losses realized due to other than temporary impairment of certain investment securities.

Professional Services. Professional services consist of fees to accountants and lawyers. Professional services expense increased to $915,333 for the year ended December 31, 2002 from $377,834 and $188,295 for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000. This increase results from additional professional services required as we raise capital, acquire properties and grow our portfolio of investment properties. Accounting fees comprise the majority of the increase in professional services expense.

General and Administrative Expenses to Affiliates. General and administrative expenses consist of salaries and computerized information services costs reimbursed to affiliates for maintaining our accounting and investor records. These expenses increased to $907,129 for the year ended December 31, 2002 from $496,970 and $251,703 for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000. This increase results from the additional services required as we raise capital, acquire properties and grow our portfolio of investment properties. Salaries reimbursed to affiliates for maintaining our accounting and investor records account for the majority of the increase.

General and Administrative Expenses to Non-Affiliates. General and administrative expenses to non-affiliates consist of insurance, postage, and printing costs. These expenses increased to $532,145 for the year ended December 31, 2002 from $179,530 and $196,748 for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000. This increase results from the additional services required as we raise capital, acquire properties and grow our portfolio of investment properties.

Property Operating Expenses to Affiliates. Property operating expenses consists of property management fees and mortgage servicing fees. These expenses to affiliates increased to $5,015,169 for the year ended December 31, 2002 from $1,664,961 and $926,978 for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000. This increase is due to the additional properties owned and operated as well as additional servicing fees related to mortgages obtained during the year ended December 31, 2002 as compared to December 31, 2001 and 2000.

Property Operating Expenses to Non-Affiliates, including Real Estate Tax. Property operating expenses, including real estate tax consist of the costs of owning and maintaining shopping centers in the Southeast and include real estate taxes, insurance, maintenance to the exterior of the buildings and the parking lots. These expenses to non-affiliates increased to $22,599,338 for the year ended December 31, 2002 from $8,513,035 and $5,352,184 for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000. This increase is primarily due to 106 properties owned and operated throughout the year ended December 31, 2002 as compared to 39 and 12 properties for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000.

Mortgage Interest to Non-Affiliates. Mortgage interest to non-affiliates increased to $23,507,709 for the year ended December 31, 2002 from $9,712,221 and $8,126,587 for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000. This increase is due to the financing of additional properties owned and operated during the year ended December 31, 2002 as compared to the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000. The increase in interest expense was partially offset by lower interest rates on the new fixed rate mortgage loans and the floating rate mortgage loans.

Depreciation. Depreciation expense increased to $26,602,045 for the year ended December 31, 2002 from $8,324,023 and $4,581,748 for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000. This increase is due to 106 properties owned and operated throughout the year ended December 31, 2002 as compared to 39 and 12 properties for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000.

Amortization. Amortization expense increased to $2,793,352 for the year ended December 31, 2002 from $328,758 and $170,662 for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000. This increase is primarily due to the implementation of SFAS 141 and SFAS 142, adopted January 1, 2002, resulting in an increase in intangible assets of approximately $14,551,000.

42


Additional Information

In the ordinary course of business, some of our tenants have announced that they have filed for bankruptcy or commenced financial restructuring. Under bankruptcy laws, tenants have the right to affirm or reject their leases with us. If a tenant rejects a lease, the tenant will no longer be required to pay rent on the property. If a tenant affirms its lease, the tenant will be required to perform all obligations under the original lease. If a tenant does not reject or affirm their lease at the beginning of the bankruptcy process, there is no assurance that the leases will not be rejected in the future. In addition, certain tenants may undergo restructuring and may close some unprofitable stores. Once a space is vacated by a bankrupt or restructured tenant, our policy is to actively attempt to re-lease the available space. Given this policy, and based on our experience, we believe that our reserves against the loss of the rent as a receivable are adequate.

As of March 18, 2003, six tenants individually occupying in excess of 10,000 square feet at six properties are currently in bankruptcy proceedings and are currently undergoing financial restructuring. None of these tenants individually or in aggregate represents greater than 5% of our space or revenue. We have four separate properties that have leases with Kmart, who has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. As of February 2003, we have been informed by Kmart that they will be vacating the space at three of these properties and will affirm the lease at the fourth property. We have further been informed that Kmart intends to vacate these three properties by April 2003. While Kmart occupies the space, they continue to pay rent. We are currently discussing terms with potential replacement tenants at the three locations to be vacated. No assurance can be given that we will enter into leases with these potential tenants or that the rental rate will equal or exceed the rates Kmart paid. Further, we will probably have to spend additional sums of money to modify the space for any new tenants. However, we believe that Kmart's bankruptcy will not have a material adverse effect on us.

43


The table below includes individual tenants that occupy in excess of 10,000 square feet and are currently in bankruptcy proceedings or are currently undergoing financial restructuring, and whose space has not been re-leased.

 

Property Name

Tenant Name

Bankruptcy/
Restructuring

Square Foot

Annual
    Rent    

Gross
Receivable at 12/31/02

Reserve
  Balance* 

Occupancy
   Status    

Columbiana Station

Zany Brainy

Bankruptcy

10,600

151,050

  -- 

  --

Occupied (1)

Creekwood Crossing

Kmart

Bankruptcy

103,015

875,628

52,676

22,967

Occupied (1)

Gateway Market Center

Waccamaw's HomePlace

Bankruptcy (2)

35,000

344,919

48,867

48,867

Vacant

Kmart

Kmart

Bankruptcy

102,098

907,349

  -- 

  --

Occupied (1)

Lake Walden Square

Kmart

Bankruptcy

91,266

383,317

  -- 

  --

Occupied (1)

Skyview Plaza

Kmart

Bankruptcy

95,810

271,979

30,445

30,445

Occupied (1)

*  The amount shown represents the amount reserves recorded by us against tenant receivables at December 31, 2002.

  1. The tenant has been paying rent on a consistent basis.
  2. The tenant has rejected the remainder of its lease.

 

We have purchased certain properties which have been identified to have an environmental concern. Substances found on these properties are considered contaminants under Federal environmental law. We evaluate the risks on an individual property basis, investigate and sometimes purchase separate environmental insurance, pursue indemnification agreements and/or claims against others, and pursue potentially available state funds for clean up purposes. As a result, we believe we are adequately protected against losses related to these environmental concerns.

 44


Subsequent Events

We paid distributions of $8,281,370, $8,953,611 and $8,784,158 to our stockholders in January, February, and March 2003.

We issued 28,631,178 shares of common stock from December 31, 2002 through March 18, 2003, resulting in a total of 150,944,516 shares of common stock outstanding. As a result, as of March 18, 2003, subscriptions for a total of 147,234,289 shares were received resulting in total gross offering proceeds of $1,471,812,072 and an additional 4,261,753 shares were issued pursuant to the DRP for $40,486,653 of additional gross proceeds. We have repurchased 551,526 shares through our share repurchase program for $5,154,834.

We have signed an application for a $100,000,000 line of credit with Key Bank. Fundings under the line of credit will require interest payments based on a margin range depending upon certain provisions contained in the credit agreement. To date, we have not drawn on this line of credit.

We have acquired the following properties during the period January 1 to March 18, 2003. The respective acquisitions are summarized in the table below.

Date

Year

Approximate Purchase Price

Gross Leasable Area

Acquired

Property

Type

Built

($)  

(Sq. Ft.)

Major Tenants

02/28/03

Capital Crossing
  Raleigh, NC

NC

1995

9,960,000

92,200

Lowe's Food Store
Staples

02/28/03

Colonial Bardmore Promenade
  Largo, FL

NC

1991

17,100,000

152,667

Publix

02/28/03

Eckerd Drug Store
  Piedmont, SC

SU

2000

1,956,000

10,908

Eckerd Drug Store

02/28/03

Suwanee Crossroads
  Suwanee, GA

NC

2002

12,130,000

69,500

Dollar Tree

02/28/03

Concord Crossing
  Concord, NC

NC

1994

5,300,000

55,930

Bi-Lo Supermarket
CVS Drug Store

02/28/03

Monroe Shopping Center
  Monroe, NC

NC

1994

3,520,000

45,080

Bi-Lo Supermarket

02/28/03

Paraiso Plaza
  Hialeah, FL

NC

1997

9,650,000

61,012

Publix

02/28/03

Sheridan Square
  Dania, FL

NC

1991

7,550,000

67,425

Publix
Dollar Tree

02/28/03

Windsor Court Shopping Center
  Windsor, CT

NC

1993

14,605,000

78,480

Stop & Shop
Block Buster
Radio Shack

02/27/03

The Overlook at King of Prussia
  King of Prussia, PA

NC

2002

57,000,000

186,980

Best Buy
Nordstrom Rack
Regal Entertainment
  Theatre (ground lease)

02/14/03

Sharon Greens Outlot

  Cumming, GA

D

N/A

575,000

N/A

N/A

02/06/03

Commonwealth Center II
  Richmond, VA

NC

2002

22,275,000

175,392

Barnes & Noble
Steinmart
Michael's

 45


Date

Year

Approximate Purchase Price

Gross Leasable Area

Acquired

Property

Type

Built

     ($)    

(Sq. Ft.)

Major Tenants

02/05/03

Market Place at Mill Creek
  Buford, GA

NC

2000/1
2002/3

50,390,000

397,354

Toys 'R Us
BORDER=0s
Lines N Things
Michaels

02/05/03

Stonecrest Marketplace
  Lithonia, GA

NC

2002

35,610,000

263,399

Babies 'R Us
Linens 'N Things
Ross Dress
Marshalls

02/04/03

Oakley Plaza
  Asheville, NC

NC

1988

9,400,000

118,727

Bi-Lo Supermarket
CVS Pharmacy

01/21/03

Springfield Park
  Lawrenceville, GA

NC

1992/
2000

10,875,000

105,321

Hobby Lobby
LA Fitness

1/21/03

Market Square
  Douglasville, GA

NC

1974/
1990

13,050,000

121,774

Office Depot
Petco
Hancock Fabrics

1/17/03

Tequesta Shoppes Plaza
  Tequesta, FL

NC

1986

11,477,000

109,937

Publix
Bealls Outlet

1/17/03

Camp Hill
  Harrisburg, PA

NC

1978/
2002

7,800,000

58,180

Michael's
Linens 'N Things

01/08/03

Eckerd Drug Store Portfolio of 19 Stores

SU

1999/
2000

  Amherst, NY
  Buffalo, NY
  Cheektowaga, NY
  Dunkirk, NY
  Cheswick, PA
  Connellsville, PA
  Erie, PA
  Erie, PA
  Erie, PA
  Millcreek, PA
  Millcreek, PA
  Harborcreek,PA
  Monroeville, PA
  Monroeville, PA
  New Castle, PA
  Penn, PA
  Pittsburgh, PA
  Plum, PA
  Weirton,WV

SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU

2,775,000
3,112,000
3,718,000
1,700,000
2,754,000
3,458,000
2,881,000
2,958,000
4,139,000
3,681,000
1,626,000
2,493,000
5,362,000
3,272,000
2,839,000
2,911,000
3,791,000
3,622,000
2,458,000

10,908
12,732
10,908
10,908
10,908
10,908
10,908
10,908
10,908
10,908
10,908
10,908
12,738
10,908
10,908
10,908
10,908
10,908
10,908

Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store

 

Type of Property

NC

Neighborhood and Community Multi-Tenant Retail Shopping Center

SU

Single User Retail Property

 D

Development Project

   

46


The assumed mortgage debt and financings obtained subsequent to December 31, 2002, are detailed in the list below.

Date Funded

Mortgage Payable

Annual Interest Rate
at 12/31/02

Maturity Date

Principal Borrowed         ($)        

         

3/11/03

Harundale Plaza
Glen Burnie, MD

4.64%

4/2010

12,362,000

         

3/11/03

North Aiken Bi-Lo
Aiken, SC

4.64%

4/2010

2,900,000

         

2/27/03

The Overlook at King of Prussia
  King of Prussia, PA

4.60%

03/2008

30,000,000

         

2/21/03

Marketplace at Mill Creek
  Buford, GA

1.850% over 30 days LIBOR

08/2003

28,900,000

         

2/21/03

Stonecrest Marketplace
  Lithonia, GA

1.850% over 30 days LIBOR

08/2003

20,000,000

         

2/19/03

Woodstock Square
  Woodstock, GA

1.75% over 30 day LIBOR

02/19/04

6,700,000

         

2/19/03

The Fountains
  Plantation, FL

1.75% over 30 day LIBOR

03/27/04

13,999,900

         

2/18/03

Forest Hills
  Wilson, NC

4.49%

03/2010

3,660,000

         

2/18/03

Gateway Plaza
  Jacksonville, NC

4.82%

03/2010

6,500,000

         

1/28/03

Market Square Shopping Center
  Douglasville, GA

7.02%

10/2008

8,390,000

         

1/8/03

Eckerds - Pool A
  Various Locations

4.94%

02/2010

9,874,000

         

1/8/03

Eckerds - Pool B
  Various Locations

4.97%

02/2010

9,490,000

         

1/8/03

Eckerds - Pool C
  Various Locations

4.97%

02/2010

7,537,000

We anticipate purchasing the following properties from unaffiliated third parties. We intend to purchase these properties with our own funds unless noted otherwise; however, we expect to place financing on the properties at a later date.

Year

Estimated Purchase Price including expenses

Gross Leasable Area

Property

Type

Built

($) (1)

(Sq. Ft.)

Comment

Major Tenants (2)

             

Watercolor Crossings
  Watercolor, FL

D

To be built

7,248,000

43,200

 

Publix

             

Berry Town Center
  Davenport, FL

D

To be built

8,118,000

61,421

 

Publix

             

The Fountains
  Plantation, FL

NC

1989

66,139,000

408,807

(3)

Marshall's

             

Legacy Place
  Palm Beach Gardens, FL

D

To be built

73,480,000

308,500

 

Linens N Things

             

Creeks at Virginia Center
  Richmond, VA

NC

2001

39,000,000

266,359

 

Bed, Bath & Beyond
Dick's Sporting Goods

 47


 

 

 

Year

Estimated Purchase Price including expenses

Gross Leasable Area

   

Property

Type

Built

($) (1)

(Sq. Ft.)

Comment

Major Tenants (2)

             

Lowe's Food/Stockbridge   Commons
  Tega Cay, SC

NC

2003

10,605,000

79,100

 

Lowe's Food

             

Hartsville Crossing
  Shopping Center
  Hartsville, SC

NC

2001

7,474,000

71,120

 

Goody's

Midway Plaza

NC

1985

26,200,000

220,259

Publix

  Tamarac, FL

Ross

Turkey Creek Pavilion

NC

2002

10,573,000

82,940

Ross

  Phase II

  Knoxville, TN

Westside Pavilion

NC

2002

56,057,000

504,364

(11)

--

  Huntsville, AL

Walk at Highwood   Preserve Phase II

NC

2003

6,577,000

28,427

Boston Market

  Tampa, FL

Publix Center

NC

2003

11,828,000

100,838

Publix

  Easley, SC

Ross

Westin Center
  Fayetteville, NC

NC

1995

5,800,000

69,950

(4)

Food Lion
CVS/Pharmacy
Family Dollar Store

             

Parkaire Landing
  Marietta, GA

NC

1996

19,534,000

160,881

(5)

World on Ice
Royal Gourmet

             

Coleman Village
  Roswell, GA

NC

2000

15,989,000

90,958

 

Kroger

             

Old Alabama
  Alpharetta, GA

NC

2000

19,339,000

89,117

 

Fresh Market
Walgreens
LA Fitness

             

Centennial Village
  Roswell, GA

NC

1999

14,688,000

95,876

 

Kroger

             

Shoppes at Wendover   Village
  Greensboro, NC

D

To be built

24,000,000

165,932

 

Ross

Home Goods

A.C. Moore

Village Center
  Mount Pleasant, WI

NC

2002/2003

24,000,000

217,103

Jewel Food
Kohl's

Carlisle Commons
  Carlisle, PA

NC

2001

39,200,000

400,640

(6)

Wal-Mart Super Center

 48


Year

Estimated Purchase Price including expenses

Gross Leasable Area

Property

Type

Built

($) (1)

(Sq. Ft.)

Comment

Major Tenants (2)

Cedar Springs Crossing
  Spartanburg, SC

NC

2001

10,150,000

86,312

Bi-Lo
Eckerds
Dollar Tree

Largo Towne Center
  Largo, MD

NC

1991

30,500,000

260,825

Shoppers Food   Warehouse
Marshall's
Regency Furniture

Lexington Place
  Lexington, SC

NC

2003

8,397,000

83,167

TJ Maxx

Ross

Starwood Heller New Jersey Portfolio

             

440 Commons
  Jersey City, NJ

NC

1997

18,085,000

162,533

 

Home Depot
Seaman's Furniture   Store

             

Edgewater Towne Center
  Edgewater, NJ

NC

2000

27,218,000

77,446

(7)

Whole Foods   Supermarket
Annie Sez

             

Brick Center Plaza
  Brick, NJ

NC

1999

19,392,000

114,028

 

Bed, Bath & Beyond
Best Buy
Seaman's Furniture
Christian Fine Home
Furnishings

             

East Hanover Plaza
  East Hanover, NJ

NC

1994

17,267,000

97,660

 

Sport Authority
Office Max
Chili's & Macaroni   Grill
NJ Pet Supply

             

Linden Plaza
  Linden, NJ

NC

1993/2001

31,766,000

275,431

 

Wal-mart
Stop & Shop

             

Route 22 Retail Center
  Union, NJ

NC

1997

18,887,000

110,453

(8)

Circuit City
Baby Superstore
The Furniture King

             

Sony Theatre Complex
  East Hanover, NJ

NC

1993

12,023,000

70,549

 

Chuck E. Cheese
Lowes Cinema

             

West Falls Plaza
  West Paterson, NJ

NC

1995

21,164,000

88,913

 

A & P
6th Avenue Electronics

             

BVT Portfolio

           
             

Publix at Brooker Creek

  Palm Harbor, FL

NC

1994

8,294,000

77,596

(9)

Publix

             

Valley Park Commons
  Hagerstown, MD

NC

1993

12,312,000

89,579

(10)

Martin's Food Store

 49


   

Year

Estimated Purchase Price including expenses

Gross Leasable Area

   

Property

Type

Built

($) (1)

(Sq. Ft.)

Comment

Major Tenants (2)

             

Paradise Portfolio

           
             

Paradise Place
  West Palm Beach, FL

NC

2003

10,873,000

74,620

 

Publix

             

Paradise Shoppes of   Ellenwood
  Ellenwood, GA

NC

2003

10,354,000

67,721

 

Publix

             

Paradise Promenade
  Davie, FL

NC

2003

12,530,000

70,291

Publix

Plaza Del Paraiso
  Miami, FL

NC

2003

14,050,000

82,291

 

Publix

             

Shoppes at Lake Dow
  McDonough, GA

NC

2002

10,281,000

73,270

 

Publix

             

Shoppes of Lithia
  Brandon, FL

NC

2003

14,173,000

79,161

 

Publix

             

Shoppes at Paradise   Point
  Ft. Walton Beach, FL

NC

2001

12,092,000

83,965

 

Publix

 

  1. Our acquisition costs may increase by additional costs, which have not yet been finally determined. We expect any additional costs to be insignificant.
  2. Major tenants include tenants leasing more than 10% of the gross leasable area of the individual property.
  3. On February 18, 2003, we funded $44,812,000 as the initial draw of a $53,000,000 committed principal amount, eighteen-month loan, secured by a first mortgage on the Fountains shopping center in Plantation, Florida. The loan accrues interest at a rate of 9.5% per annum on the outstanding principal balance. We intend to acquire this property upon completion of the redevelopment of the property.
  4. As part of the purchase of Westin Center, we will assume the existing debt with a remaining balance of approximately $4,068,000. The loan requires principal and interest payment based on an annual rate of 7.36% and matures in 2011.
  5. As part of the purchase of Parkaire Landing, we will assume the modified existing debt with a remaining balance of approximately $11,676,000. The loan requires monthly interest payments based on an annual rate of 7.0% and matures in 2009.
  6. Initially, we intend to fund a $36,000,000 loan to the seller of Carlisle Commons. The loan will require interest only payments based on a rate of 8.446% per annum and will mature in September 2003. We have the right to acquire this property in September 2003.
  7. The gross leasable area includes 57,984 square feet of residential space, containing 64 apartment units.
  8. As part of the acquisition of the Route 22 Retail Center, we will assume the existing debt with a remaining principal balance of approximately $10,413, 000, after a $914,000 prepayment of principal. The loan requires interest only payments at a rate of 7.49% per annum and matures in 2008.
  9. As part of the purchase of this property, we will assume the existing modified debt with a remaining balance of approximately $4,510,000. The loan will require interest only payments based on an annual rate of 7.875% and will mature December 2004.

(10) The seller is currently negotiating with Martin's Food Store to expand into a portion of the currently vacant space. It is anticipated that the seller will provide a master lease on any vacant space at this property at the time of purchase.

(11) As of March 18, 2003 we have funded $46,054,458 to the developer of Westside Pavilion of the total $51,000,000 committed. Any amount outstanding on this commitment will be repaid at the time we purchase this property, assuming we exercise our right to close.

Type of Property

NC   Neighborhood and Community Multi-Tenant Retail Shopping Center

SU  Single User Property

 D  Development Project

 50


As of March 18, 2003, we have leases with or intend to acquire properties with an aggregate of 7 tenants that are affiliates of Ahold NV. Ahold has recently disclosed potentially fraudulent or improper accounting treatment. Ahold also announced that its chief executive officer and chief financial officer will resign. We continue to monitor the situation although we do not know what impact, if any, these issues at Ahold will have on us.

Impact of Accounting Principles

On April 30, 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 145 ("SFAS 145"), "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13 and Technical Corrections." The rescission of SFAS No. 4, "Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt," and SFAS No. 64 "Extinguishments of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements," which amended SFAS No. 4, will affect income statement classification of gains and losses from extinguishment of debt. SFAS No. 4 requires that gains and losses from extinguishment of debt be classified as an extraordinary item, if material. Under SFAS No. 145, extinguishment of debt is now considered a risk management strategy by the reporting enterprise and the FASB does not believe it should be considered extraordinary under the criteria in APB Opinion No. 30, "Reporting the Results of Operations-Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions," unless the debt extinguishment meets the unusual in nature and infrequency of occurrence criteria in APR Opinion No. 30. SFAS 145 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. Upon adoption, extinguishment of debt shall be classified under the criteria in APB Opinion No. 30.

In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45 ("FIN 45") "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness to Others, an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57 and 107 and a rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34. FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under guarantees issued. FIN 45 also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken. The initial recognition and measurements provisions of FIN 45 are applicable to guarantees issed or modified after December 31, 2002 and are not expected to have a material effect on our financial statements. The disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements of interim and annual periods ending after December 31, 2002.

In December 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148 ("SFAS 148), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure," an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this Statement amends the disclosure requirements of Statement No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements. Adoption of this statement will not have a material effect on our financial statements.

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No. 51 which provides new accounting guidance on when to consolidate a variable interest, as defined in the Interpretation. The Interpretation applies immediately to variable interests in variable interest entities created or obtained after January 31, 2003. The Interpretation required certain disclosures in the financial statements as of December 31, 2002 if it is reasonably possible that we will consolidate or disclose information about variable interest entities when the Interpretation becomes effective. We have accounted for fundings issued to borrowers for the development or purchase of investment properties as development receivables or mortgage receivables, respectively. Because the amounts funded in relation to the equity investment of the borrower in the underlying property, it is reasonably possible that we will be required to consolidate or disclose additional information with regards to the underlying investment properties' financial position when the statement becomes effective. Our maximum exposure to loss as a result of the notes receivable would be the amount of the receivable balance outstanding at December 31, 2002 less amounts paid after year end which amounts to approximately $48,000,000.

51


Inflation

For our multi-tenant shopping centers, inflation is likely to increase rental income from leases to new tenants and lease renewals, subject to market conditions. Our rental income and operating expenses for those properties owned, or to be owned and operated under triple-net leases are not likely to be directly affected by future inflation, since rents are or will be fixed under the leases and property expenses are the responsibility of the tenants. The capital appreciation of triple-net leased properties is likely to be influenced by interest rate fluctuations. To the extent that inflation determines interest rates, future inflation may have an effect on the capital appreciation of triple-net leased properties. As of December 31, 2002, we owned 21 single-user triple-net leased properties.

Item 7(a). Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of long-term debt used to maintain liquidity and fund capital expenditures and expansion of our real estate investment portfolio and operations. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives we borrow primarily at fixed rates or variable rates with the lowest margins available and, in some cases, with the ability to convert variable rates to fixed rates. We may enter into derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps, caps and treasury locks in order to mitigate interest rate risk on a related financial instrument. We do not enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative purposes.

Our interest rate risk is monitored using a variety of techniques. The table below presents the principal amounts and weighted average interest rates by year of expected maturity to evaluate the expected cash flows and sensitivity to interest rate changes.

 

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Thereafter

             

Maturing debt:

           

Fixed rate debt

$11,854,108

$1,034,419

$28,659,792

$43,535,808

$66,541,345

$266,995,569

  Variable rate debt

18,681,521

--

5,000,000

29,337,500

168,006,909

35,975,000

             

Average interest rate on debt:

           

  Fixed rate debt

7.62%

7.51%

7.57%

6.80%

6.75%

6.21%

  Variable rate debt

3.75%

N/A

3.03%

3.20%

3.25%

3.17%

The fair value of our debt approximates its carrying amount.

The principal balance of $257,000,930 or 38% of our mortgages payable at December 31, 2002, have variable interest rates averaging 3.27%. An increase in the variable interest rate on certain mortgages payable constitutes a market risk.

We are currently working with lenders to obtain new financing to pay off certain of the loans that mature in 2003. We also expect to use proceeds from the offering to payoff a portion of the loans maturing in 2003. As part of our financing strategy, we prepare packages which are forwarded to prospective lenders. Each package contains specific details regarding each property and is designed to familiarize prospective lenders with the properties sufficient to allow them to provide interest rate quotes to us. We believe that this method of receiving competitive bids from lenders is the most effective means of obtaining favorable financing. The packages covering the majority of properties whose debt matures in 2003 have been prepared and are currently being disseminated to lenders. We are confident we will obtain new long-term financing to achieve our strategy objective.

 52


Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)


Index

 

Page

   

Independent Auditors' Report

54

   

Financial Statements:

 
   

  Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2002 and 2001

55

   

  Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000

57

   

  Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended
    December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000

58

   

  Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000

59

   

  Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

61

   

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Schedule III)

89

 

Schedules not filed:

All schedules other than the one listed in the Index have been omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the financial statements or related notes.

 

53


 

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

 

 

 

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc.:

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. (the Company) as listed in the accompanying index. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedule as listed in the accompanying index. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

As discussed in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of account for intangible assets in 2002.

 

KPMG LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois
March 21, 2003

 

 

54


 

INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)


Consolidated Balance Sheets

December 31, 2002 and 2001


Assets

   

     2002     

 

     2001     

Investment properties:

       

  Land

$

363,767,644

$

145,662,393 

  Building and other improvements

 

1,124,824,956

 

447,333,253 

  Construction in progress-land

 

8,090,004

 

959,257 

  Construction in progress-buildings and other improvements

 

     2,998,492

 

     1,783,953 

         
   

1,499,681,096

 

595,738,856 

  Less accumulated depreciation

 

   (40,737,139)

 

   (14,135,094)

Net investment properties

 

1,458,943,957

 

581,603,762

         

Investment in joint venture

 

--

 

2,876,869 

Mortgages receivable

 

100,975,017

 

1,100,000 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

134,977,144

 

24,534,356 

Restricted escrows

 

6,872,411

 

2,340,086 

Restricted cash

 

11,220,834

 

4,711,746 

Investment in securities

 

6,987,700

 

6,704,775 

Accounts and rents receivable, (net of allowance of $1,024,720 and $840,903 as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 respectively)

 

13,975,832

 

4,439,492 

Development receivables

 

928,363

 

--

Acquired in-place lease origination costs (net of accumulated   amortization of $1,206,324 and none as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively)

 

13,344,182

 

--

Acquired above market lease costs (net of accumulated amortization of $953,493 and none as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively)

 

11,371,843

 

--

Leasing and Loan fees (net of accumulated amortization of $2,053,066 and $465,703 as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively)

 

6,864,374

 

2,758,526 

Other assets

 

      1,226,702

 

       518,207 

         

Total assets

$

1,767,688,359

$

631,587,819 

   

==========

 

==========

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
55


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Consolidated Balance Sheets
(continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001


Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity

   

     2002     

 

     2001     

Liabilities:

       

  Accounts payable

$

483,944

$

477,204 

  Development payables

 

2,558,834

 

54,700

  Accrued offering costs due to affiliates

 

1,309,885

 

773,191 

  Accrued offering costs due to non-affiliates

 

117,540

 

274,800 

  Accrued interest payable to non-affiliates

 

1,844,071

 

714,478 

  Real estate taxes payable

 

237,366

 

--

  Distributions payable

 

8,281,370

 

2,376,125 

  Security deposits

 

2,339,265

 

698,155 

  Mortgages payable

 

675,621,971

 

313,499,312 

  Prepaid rental and recovery income

 

1,762,106

 

594,592 

  Note and margin payable

 

3,402,071

 

6,260,483 

  Acquired below market lease costs (net of accumulated amortization of $748,287 and none as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively)

 

9,946,024

 

--

  Restricted cash liability

 

11,220,834

 

4,711,746 

  Other liabilities

 

369,523

 

52,296 

  Due to affiliates

 

2,515,204

 

 332,831 

         

    Total liabilities

 

722,010,008

 

330,819,913 

         

  Minority interest in partnership

 

2,000 

 

2,000 

         

Stockholders' Equity:

       

  Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding

 

--    

 

--    

Common stock, $.01 par value, 213,687,349 shares authorized, 122,313,103 and 35,891,718 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively

 

1,223,131

 

358,917 

  Additional paid-in capital (net of costs of Offering of

       

    $125,224,459 and $39,335,560 at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, of which $111,594,678 and $30,981,962 was paid or accrued to Affiliates, respectively)

 

1,091,208,613

 

316,759,170 

  Accumulated distributions in excess of net income

 

(45,848,709)

 

(15,282,504)

  Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(906,684)

 

   (1,069,677)

         

    Total stockholders' equity

 

1,045,676,351

 

 300,765,906

         

Commitments and contingencies (Notes 6, 7, 12 and 13)

       
         

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

$

1,767,688,359

$

631,587,819 

   

=========

 

=========

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

56


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000

   

2002

 

2001

 

2000

Income:

           

  Rental income, net of amortization of above and below market lease costs

$

90,974,084

$

28,247,886

$

16,349,483

  Real estate tax recovery income

 

9,762,744

 

3,162,875

 

2,008,027

  Common area cost recovery income

 

10,372,571

 

3,550,604

 

1,883,446

  Additional rental income

 

401,849

 

311,866

 

842,615

  Interest and dividend income

4,411,158

2,103,810

845,013

  Other income, net of realized loss from investment securities

 

88,360

 

377,722

 

      195,329

             

Total income

 

116,010,766

 

  37,754,763

 

 22,123,913

             

Expenses:

           

  Professional services to affiliates

 

88,254

 

--

 

6,019

  Professional services to non-affiliates

 

827,079

 

377,834

 

182,276

  General and administrative expenses to affiliates

 

907,129

 

496,970

 

251,703

  General and administrative expenses to
    non-affiliates

 

532,145

 

179,530 

 

196,748 

  Advisor asset management fee

 

5,293,000

 

--

 

120,000 

  Property operating expenses to affiliates

 

5,015,169

 

1,664,961 

 

926,978 

  Property operating expenses to non-affiliates

 

12,190,721

 

5,090,765 

 

3,256,670

  Real Estate Tax

 

10,408,617

 

3,422,270

 

2,095,514

  Mortgage interest to non-affiliates

 

23,507,709

 

9,712,221 

 

8,126,587

  Depreciation

 

26,602,045

 

8,324,023 

 

4,581,748

  Amortization

 

2,793,352

 

328,758 

 

170,662

  Acquisition cost expenses to affiliates

 

9,908

 

22,989 

 

118

  Acquisition cost expenses to non-affiliates

340,352

        141,799 

148,376

             

Total expenses

 

88,515,480

 

  29,762,120

 

 20,063,399

             

Net income

$

27,495,286

$

    7,992,643

$

  2,060,514

             

Other comprehensive income (loss):

           

  Unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities

 

162,993

 

     (999,781)

 

     (69,896)

             

Comprehensive income

$

27,658,279

$

6,992,862 

$

1,990,618

   

=========

 

=========

 

========

             

Net income per common share, basic and diluted

$

.39

$

.37 

$

.24

   

=========

 

=========

 

========

             

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted

 

70,243,809

 

21,682,783 

 

8,590,250

   

=========

 

=========

 

========

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

57


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity

For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000

 

Number of Shares

Common
  Stock    

Additional Paid-in
    Capital     

Accumulated
Distributions in excess of Net Income

Accumulated Other Comprehensive

Loss       

      Total       

Balance at January 1, 2000

5,433,839 

$  54,338 

$ 46,188,392

$  (1,228,865)

$              --    

$45,013,865 

Net income

--    

--    

--    

2,060,514 

--    

2,060,514 

Unrealized loss on investment securities

--    

--    

--    

--    

(69,896)

(69,896)

Distributions declared ($.77 per weighted average number of common shares outstanding)

--    

--    

--    

(6,615,454)

--    

(6,615,454)

Proceeds from Offering including DRP (net of Offering costs $8,464,547)

7,520,716 

75,207 

65,847,401 

--    

--    

65,922,608 

Shares repurchased

    (58,785)

       (588)

      (531,413)

                 --    

                   --     

      (532,001)

             

Balance at December 31, 2000

12,895,770

$ 128,957 

$ 111,504,380 

$ (5,783,805)

$      (69,896)

$105,779,636 

             

Net income

--    

--    

--    

7,992,643 

--    

7,992,643 

Unrealized loss on investment securities

--    

--    

--    

--    

(999,781)

(999,781)

Distributions declared ($.81 per weighted average number   of common shares outstanding)

--    

--    

--    

(17,491,342)

--    

(17,491,342)

Proceeds from Offering including DRP (net of Offering costs $22,813,954)

23,125,670 

231,257 

206,448,770 

--    

--    

206,680,027 

Shares repurchased

   (129,722)

      (1,297)

   (1,193,980)

              --    

                    --    

   (1,195,277)

             

Balance at December 31, 2001

35,891,718 

$ 358,917 

$ 316,759,170 

$ (15,282,504)

$      (1,069,677)

$300,765,906 

Net income

--    

--    

--    

27,495,286

--    

27,495,286

Unrealized gain on investment securities

--    

--    

--    

--    

162,993

162,993

Distributions declared ($.83 per weighted average number of common shares outstanding)

--    

--    

--    

(58,061,491)

--    

(58,061,491)

Proceeds from Offering including DRP (net of Offering costs $85,888,899)

86,658,027

866,580

776,668,292

--    

--    

777,534,872

Shares repurchased

      (236,642)

     (2,366)

     (2,218,849)

              -- 

                    --    

(2,221,215)

Balance at December 31, 2002

122,313,103

$ 1,223,131

$ 1,091,208,613

$ (45,848,709)

$        (906,684)

$ 1,045,676,351

 

==========

========

===========

===========

=============

============

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

58


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000

   

      2002      

 

      2001      

 

      2000      

Cash flows from operating activities:

           

Net income

$

27,495,286

$

7,992,643 

$

2,060,514 

Adjustments to reconcile net income:

           

Depreciation

 

26,602,045

 

8,324,023 

 

4,581,748 

Amortization

 

2,793,352

 

328,758 

 

170,662 

Realized loss on investment securities

 

508,375

 

--

 

--

Gain on sale of investment securities

 

(36,654)

 

(127,539)

 

--

Principal escrow

 

--

 

--

 

53,086

Rental income under master leases

 

1,780,102

 

1,675,983 

 

365,552 

Straight line rental income

 

(2,212,908)

 

(746,929)

 

(493,180)

Amortization of above and below market lease costs

 

205,206

 

--

 

--   

Income from unconsolidated joint venture

 

(190,405)

 

(111,658)

 

--    

Changes in assets and liabilities:

           

Accounts and rents receivable net of change in allowance of $183,817, $567,322 and $273,581 for 2002, 2001 and 2000

 

(7,323,433)

 

(945,306)

 

(922,864)

Other assets

 

(708,495)

 

(22,313)

 

(390,478)

Accrued interest payable to non-affiliates

 

1,129,593

 

85,270 

 

210,205 

Real estate tax payable

 

237,366

 

(205,919)

 

92,956 

Accounts payable

 

6,740

 

451,674 

 

6,136 

Prepaid rental and recovery income

 

1,167,514

 

234,974 

 

350,033 

Other liabilities

 

317,227

 

(54,155) 

 

(388,487)

Security deposits

 

1,641,109

 

384,230

 

81,555

Due to affiliates

 

2,182,372

 

         162,898

 

      (412,854)

Net cash provided by operating activities

55,594,392

    17,426,634

     5,364,584 

             

Cash flows from investing activities:

           

Restricted escrows

 

(4,532,325)

 

(2,000,000)

 

382,618 

Purchase of investment securities, net of change in margin account of $240,588, $2,809,108 and $352,376 for 2002, 2001 and 2000

 

(884,709)

 

(5,157,670)

 

(1,254,987)

Proceeds from sale of investment securities

 

508,781

 

1,927,227

 

--

Purchase of joint venture

 

--

 

(2,876,869)

 

--

Distributions from unconsolidated joint venture

 

190,405

 

111,658

 

--

Purchase of investment properties, net of change in development payables and receivables

 

(733,177,956)

 

(292,676,150)

 

(64,747,654)

Additions to investment properties, net of change in related payables

 

(11,994,653)

 

(2,458,996)

 

(306,962)

Leasing fees

 

(383,463)

 

 (154,768)

 

 (41,188)

Funding of mortgages receivable

 

(100,975,017)

 

--

 

(1,100,000)

       

    

   

Net cash used in investing activities

(851,248,937)

 (303,285,568)

 (67,068,173)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

59


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(continued)

For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000

   

      2002      

 

      2001      

 

      2000      

Cash flows from financing activities:

           

  Proceeds from offerings

$

863,044,337

$

229,493,981 

$

74,387,155 

  Repurchase of shares

 

(2,221,215)

 

(1,195,277)

 

(532,001)

  Payment of offering costs

 

(85,509,465)

 

(22,048,100)

 

(11,046,314)

  Proceeds from issuance of debt

 

367,830,651

 

104,771,000 

 

37,757,500 

  Principal payments of debt-balloon

 

(176,138,100)

 

(6,720,000)

 

(22,457,441)

Principal payments of debt-amortization

 

(344,216)

 

(257,199)

 

--

  Principal payments of note payable

 

(3,099,000)

 

--

 

--

  Loan fees

 

(5,309,413)

 

(2,352,192)

 

(511,259)

  Distributions paid

 

(52,156,246)

 

   (15,963,434)

 

   (6,098,704)

Net cash provided by financing activities

906,097,333

285,728,779 

71,498,936 

             

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

110,442,788

 

(130,155)

 

9,795,347 

Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of year

 

24,534,356

 

    24,664,511

 

   14,869,164 

             

Cash and cash equivalents, at end of year

$

134,977,144

$

24,534,356 

$

24,664,511 

   

=========

 

=========

 

=========

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

Cash paid for interest, net of $444,891, $116,648,

           

  and $0 capitalized at December 31, 2002, 2001 and

           

  2000, respectively

 

22,378,116

 

9,626,951 

 

7,807,708 

.

 

=========

 

=========

 

========

             

Restricted cash

 

(6,509,088)

 

(3,847,475)

 

(469,907)

Restricted cash liability

 

6,509,088

 

3,847,475 

 

469,907 

   

=========

 

=========

 

========

Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:

   

      2002      

 

      2001      

 

      2000      

Purchase of investment properties

$

(909,504,920)

$

(403,080,750)

$

(64,747,654)

Assumption of mortgage debt

 

170,774,324

 

107,305,600 

 

--

Investment in joint venture converted to investment
  property

 

2,876,869

 

--

 

--

Proceeds from mortgage receivable payoff

 

1,100,000

 

--

 

--

Net change in development payables

 

2,504,134

 

3,099,000

 

--

Net change in development receivables

 

(928,363)

 

     -- 

 

          --

Cash used to purchase investment properties

$

(733,177,956)

$

 (292,676,150)

$

(64,747,654)

   

=========

 

=========

 

========

Additions to investment properties, unpaid

$

2,558,834

$

54,700

$

--

   

=========

 

=========

 

========

Distributions payable

$

8,281,370

$

2,376,125 

$

848,217 

   

=========

 

=========

 

========

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
60


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2002 and 2001

(1)  Organization and Basis of Accounting

Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. (the "Company") was formed on September 3, 1998 as a Maryland corporation to acquire and manage a diversified portfolio of real estate, primarily multi-tenant shopping centers. The Company has initially focused on acquiring properties in the southeastern states, primarily Florida, Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina. The Company may also acquire properties east of the Mississippi River in addition to single-user retail properties in locations throughout the United States, certain of which may be sale and leaseback transactions, net leased to creditworthy tenants. Inland Retail Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc. (the "Advisor"), an affiliate of the Company, is the advisor to the Company. On February 11, 1999, the Company commenced an initial public offering (the "Initial Offering"), on a best efforts basis of 50,000,000 shares of common stock ("Shares") at $10 per Share and 4,000,000 Shares at $9.50 per Share which may be distributed pursuant to the Company's Distribution Reinvestment Program ("DRP"). The Company terminated its Initial Offering on January 31, 2001. As of January 31, 2001, the Company had received subscriptions for a total of 13,687,349 Shares. The Company began an additional offering on February 1, 2001 (the "First Follow-On Offering") on a best efforts basis. As of August 29, 2002, the Company sold 50,000,000 shares from the First Follow-On Offering resulting in gross proceeds of $497,842,917, thereby completing the second offering. Concurrent with the First Follow-On Offering, the Company began a third offering on June 7, 2002 (the "Second Follow-On Offering") on a best effort basis of 150,000,000 Shares of common stock at $10 per Share and 12,000,000 Shares at $9.50 per Share which may be distributed pursuant to the DRP. As of December 31, 2002, the Company has received subscriptions for a total of 56,005,766 Shares in the Second Follow-On Offering. In addition, the Company has issued 1,534,732 Shares pursuant to the Company's DRP. The Initial Offering, the First Follow-On Offering and the Second Follow-On Offering are collectively referred to as the "Offerings". As of December 31, 2002, the Company has repurchased a total of 425,149 Shares through the Company's Share Repurchase Program for $3,948,493.

The Company is qualified and has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") under section 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Since the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to Federal income tax to the extent it distributes at least 90% of its REIT taxable income to its stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, the Company will be subject to Federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate tax rates. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property and Federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed income.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Certain reclassifications have been made to 2000 and 2001 financial statements to conform with the 2002 presentations.

The Company classifies its investment in securities in one of three categories: trading, available-for-sale, or held-to-maturity. Trading securities are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term. Held-to-maturity securities are those securities in which the Company has the ability and intent to hold the security until maturity. All securities not included in trading or held-to-maturity are classified as available for sale. Investment in securities at December 31, 2002 consist principally of preferred stock investments in various real estate investment trusts and are classified as available-for-sale securities and are recorded at fair value. Unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of comprehensive income until realized. Realized gains and losses from the sale of available-for-sale securities are determined on a specific identification

61


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001

basis. A decline in the market value of any available-for-sale security below cost that is deemed to be other than temporary results in a reduction in the carrying amount to fair value. The impairment is charged to earnings and a new cost basis for the security is established. Dividend income is recognized when earned. Additionally, the Company has purchased its securities through a margin account. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, the company has recorded a payable of $3,402,071 and $3,161,484, respectively, for securities purchased on margin. During the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 the Company realized $471,721 of losses and $127,539 of gains on sale of investment securities, respectively. Of the investment securities held on December 31, 2002 and 2001, the Company has accumulated other comprehensive loss $ 906,684 and $1,069,677, respectively.

On April 30, 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 145 ("SFAS 145"), "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13 and Technical Corrections." The rescission of SFAS No. 4, "Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt," and SFAS No. 64, "Extinguishments of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements," which amended SFAS No. 4, will affect income statement classification of gains and losses from extinguishment of debt. SFAS No. 4 requires that gains and losses from extinguishment of debt be classified as an extraordinary item, if material. Under SFAS No. 145, extinguishment of debt is now considered a risk management strategy by the reporting enterprise and the FASB does not believe it should be considered extraordinary under the criteria in APB Opinion No. 30, "Reporting the Results of Operations-Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions," unless the debt extinguishment meets the unusual in nature and infrequency of occurrence criteria in APB Opinion No. 30. SFAS 145 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. Upon adoption, extinguishments of debt shall be classified under the criteria in APB Opinion No. 30.

In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45 ("FIN 45") "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness to Others, an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57 and 107 and a rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34. FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under guarantees issued. FIN 45 also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken. The initial recognition and measurement provisions of FIN 45 are applicable to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002 and are not expected to have a material effect on the Company's financial statements. The disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements of interim and annual periods ending after December 31, 2002.

In December 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148 ("SFAS 148"), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure," an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this Statement amends the disclosure requirements of Statement No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements. Adoption of this statement will not have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.

62


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No. 51 which provides new accounting guidance on when to consolidate a variable interest, as defined in the Interpretation. The Interpretation applies immediately to variable interests in variable interest entities created or obtained after January 31, 2003. The Interpretation required certain disclosures in the financial statements as of December 31, 2002 if it is reasonably possible that the Company will consolidate or disclose information about variable interest entities when the Interpretation becomes effective. The Company has accounted for fundings issued to borrowers for the development or purchase of investment properties as development receivables or mortgage receivables, respectively. These receivables are typically secured by the underlying investment property and guarantees of the borrowers. Because the amounts funded in relation to the equity investment of the borrower in the underlying property, it is reasonably possible that the Company will be required to consolidate or disclose additional information with regards to the underlying investment properties' financial position when the statement becomes effective. . The Company's maximum exposure to loss as a result of the notes receivable would be the amount of the receivable balance outstanding at December 31, 2002 less amounts paid after year end which amounts to approximately $48,000,000.

The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents and are carried at cost, which approximates market.

In conjunction with certain acquisitions, the Company receives payments under master lease agreements pertaining to certain, non-revenue producing spaces either at the time of, or subsequent to, the purchase of some of the Company's properties. GAAP requires that upon receipt of these payments, the receipts are to be recorded as a reduction in the purchase price of the related properties rather than as rental income. These master leases were established at the time of purchase in order to mitigate the potential negative effects of loss of rent and expense reimbursements. Master lease payments are received through a draw of funds escrowed at the time of purchase and may cover a period from one to three years. These funds may be released to either the Company or the seller when certain leasing conditions are met. Restricted cash includes funds received by third party escrow agents, from sellers, pertaining to master lease agreements.

In addition, restricted cash includes construction escrows established at the time Hillsboro Square was acquired. The construction escrows were established in order to cover the cost of construction and potential cost overruns related to certain tenants. Similar to the master lease escrows, these funds may be released to either the Company or the seller when certain conditions are met. The Company records such escrows as both an asset and a corresponding liability, until certain leasing conditions are met.

The Company capitalizes costs incurred during the development period, including direct and indirect costs incurred during the development period, such as construction, insurance, architectural costs, and legal fees, interest and other financing costs, and real estate taxes. The development period is considered to end once the property is substantially complete and available for occupancy. At such time those costs included in construction in progress are reclassified to land and building and other improvements. Development payables consist of retainage and other costs incurred and not yet paid pertaining to the development projects. The Company maintained development payables of $2,558,834 and $54,700 at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The Hillsboro Square development agreement was established such that the Company initially pays certain development costs and subsequently obtains a refund of these costs from the construction escrow. The development receivables consist of amounts due to the Company from this construction escrow as well as accrued interest on certain development notes receivable net of interest capitalized, further described in footnote 8. The Company maintained development receivables of $928,363 and none at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Restricted escrows primarily consist of a lender restricted escrow and an earnout escrow. The earnout escrow was established upon the acquisition of an investment property for which the funds may be released to the seller when certain leasing conditions have been met.

63


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001

The Company performs quarterly impairment analysis for its long-lived assets in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 ("SFAS 144") to ensure that the investment property's carrying value does not exceed its fair value. The valuation analysis performed by the Company was based upon many factors which require difficult, complex or subjective judgments to be made. Such assumptions include projecting vacancy rates, rental rates, operating expenses, lease terms, tenant financial strength, economy, demographics, property location, capital expenditures and sales value among other assumptions to be made upon valuing each property. This valuation is sensitive to the actual results of any of these uncertain factors, either individually or taken as a whole. Based upon the Company's judgment, no permanent impairment was warranted for the years ending December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000.

Depreciation expense is computed using the straight line method. Building and improvements are depreciated based upon estimated useful lives of 30 years for building and improvements and 15 years for site improvements.

Tenant improvements are amortized on a straight line basis over the life of the related lease as a component of amortization expense.

In July 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 141, Business Combinations, ("SFAS 141") and Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets ("SFAS 142"). SFAS 141 requires use of the purchase method of accounting for all business combinations completed after June 30, 2001. SFAS 141 also specifies that intangible assets acquired in a purchase method business combination must meet certain criteria to be recognized and reported apart from goodwill. SFAS 142 requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives no longer be amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually. SFAS 142 also requires the amortization of intangible assets with estimable useful lives over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values and review for impairment in accordance with SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of" ("SFAS 144"). On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS 141 and SFAS 142. Furthermore, any goodwill or intangible asset determined to have an indefinite useful life acquired in a purchase business combination completed after June 30, 2001 may not be amortized, but must be evaluated for permanent impairment. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in business combinations completed before July 1, 2001 were amortized until January 1, 2002. The adoption of these standards resulted in the recognition upon acquisition of additional intangible assets (acquired in-place lease origination cost and above market leases) and liabilities (acquired below market leases) relating to the Company's 2002 real estate acquisitions of approximately $14,551,000, $12,325,000 and $10,694,000, respectively. The portion of the purchase price allocated to acquired above market leases and acquired below market leases are amortized on a straight line basis over the life of the related lease as an adjustment to rental income. This allocation was applied to 84 properties acquired. Amortization pertaining to the above market lease costs of $953,493 was applied as a reduction to rental income for the year ending December 31, 2002. Amortization pertaining to the below market lease costs of $748,287 was applied as an increase to rental income for the year ending December 31, 2002.

The portion of the purchase price allocated to acquired in-place lease origination costs are amortized on a straight line basis over the life of the related lease. This allocation was applied to 84 properties acquired. The Company incurred amortization expense pertaining to acquired in-place lease origination costs of $1,206,324 for the year ending December 31, 2002.

Leasing fees are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the related lease.

Loan fees are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the related loans.

Offering costs are offset against the stockholders' equity accounts and consist principally of printing, selling and registration costs.

64


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001

Rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of each lease. The difference between rental income earned on a straight-line basis and the cash rent due under the provisions of the lease agreements is recorded as deferred rent receivable and is included as a component of accounts and rents receivable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

The carrying amount of the Company's debt approximates fair value. The carrying amount of the Company's other financial instruments approximate fair value because of the relatively short maturity of these instruments.

 

Staff Accounting Bulletin 101, "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements" ("SAB 101"), determined that a lessor should defer recognition of contingent rental income (i.e. percentage/excess rent) until the specified target (i.e. breakpoint) that triggers the contingent rental income is achieved. The Company records percentage rental revenue in accordance with the SAB 101.

Notes receivable relate to real estate financing arrangements that exceed one year bear interest at a market rate based on the borrower's credit quality and are recorded at face value. Interest is recognized over the life of the note. The Company requires collateral for the notes.

A note is considered impaired pursuant to Financial Accounting Standard's Board's (FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan. Pursuant to SFAS No. 114, a note is impaired if it is probable that the Company will not collect all principal and interest contractually due. The impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the note's effective interest rate. The Company does not accrue interest when a note is considered impaired. When ultimate collectibility of the principal balance of the impaired note is in doubt, all cash receipts on impaired notes are applied to reduce the principal amount of such notes until the principal has been recovered and are recognized as interest income, thereafter.

(2)  Basis of Presentation

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company, as well as all wholly owned subsidiaries and the accounts of the operating partnership. Wholly owned subsidiaries generally consist of limited liability companies ("LLC's") for which separate financial records are maintained. The Company has approximately a 99% controlling general partner interest of the operating partnership, and the Advisor owns the remaining, limited partner common units for which it paid $2,000. The Advisor's limited partner common units is reflected as minority interest in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statement. The effects of all significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

Four individual LLCs formed by the Company each purchased a shopping center from an unaffiliated third party by paying cash and assuming the respective first mortgage financing for the properties known as Douglasville Pavilion, Southlake Pavilion, Fayetteville Pavilion and Sarasota Pavilion. The Company formed the LLCs with Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation ("IREIC,") an affiliate of the Advisor, as an additional member in order to satisfy certain requirements of the lender. This requirement resulted in IREIC guaranteeing the loans and holding a majority voting interest in each LLC; however the Company retained all economic burdens and benefits of ownership of the respective properties throughout the guarantee period. As consideration for IREIC's guaranty of the loans, the Company paid IREIC an annual fee equal to 1/8% of the outstanding loan balance, paid monthly. The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the joint venture LLCs with IREIC and no provision for their minority interests have been reflected. In June, 2002, the respective financing was repaid and the IREIC loan guarantee was extinguished.

 65


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001

(3)  Services Provided by Affiliates of the Advisor

As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, the Company had incurred $125,224,459 and $39,335,560, respectively, of offering costs, of which $111,594,678 and $30,981,962 was paid to affiliates. Pursuant to the terms of the Offerings, the Advisor has guaranteed payment of all public offering expenses (excluding sales commissions and the marketing contribution and the due diligence expense allowance) in excess of 5.5% of the gross proceeds of the Offerings ("Gross Offering Proceeds") or all organization and offering expenses (including selling commissions) which together exceed 15% of Gross

Offering Proceeds. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, offering costs did not exceed the 5.5% and 15% limitations. The Company anticipates that these costs will not exceed these limitations upon completion of the Second Follow-On Offering. Any excess amounts at the completion of the Second Follow-On Offering will be reimbursed by the Advisor.

The Advisor and its affiliates are entitled to reimbursement for salaries and expenses of employees of the Advisor and its affiliates relating to the Offerings. In addition, an affiliate of the Advisor is entitled to receive selling commissions, and the marketing contribution and due diligence expense allowance from the Company in connection with the Offerings. Such costs are offset against the Stockholders' equity accounts. Such costs totaled $ 79,614,867, $19,287,730, and $6,907,685 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, of which $1,309,885 and $773,191 was unpaid at December 31, 2002, and 2001, respectively.

The Advisor and its affiliates are entitled to reimbursement for general and administrative of the Advisor and its affiliates relating to our administration. Such costs are included in general and administrative expenses to affiliates, professional services to affiliates, and acquisition cost expenses to affiliates, in addition to costs that were capitalized pertaining to property acquisitions. During the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000 the Company incurred $1,702,748, $538,306, and $257,840, respectively of these costs, of which $515,204 and $332,831 remained unpaid as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

An affiliate of the Advisor provides loan servicing to the Company for an annual fee. Such costs are incurred in property operating expenses to affiliates. The agreement allows for annual fees totaling .05% of the first $100,000,000 in mortgage balance outstanding and .03% of the remaining mortgage balance, payable monthly. Such fees totaled $ 145,085, $59,469 and $48,322 in the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

The Advisor has contributed $200,000 to the capital of the Company for which it received 20,000 Shares.

The Company used the services of an affiliate of the Advisor to facilitate the mortgage financing that the Company obtained on some of the properties purchased. Such costs are capitalized as loan fees and amortized over the respective loan term. During the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 the Company paid loan fees totaling $ 477,274, $177,436 and $23,438, respectively, to this affiliate.

The Company is obligated to pay an advisor asset management fee of not more than 1% of the Company's net asset value. The Company's net asset value is defined as the total book value of our assets invested in equity interests and loans receivable secured by real estate, before reserves for depreciation, reserves for bad debt or other similar non-cash reserves, reduced by any mortgages payable on the respective assets. The Company computes our net asset value by taking the average of these values at the end of each month for which the Company is calculating the fee. The fee is payable quarterly in an amount equal to 1/4 of 1% of net asset value as of the last day of the immediately preceding quarter. For any year in which the Company qualifies as a REIT, the Company's advisor must reimburse the company for the following amounts if any: (1) the amounts by which the Company's total operating expenses, the sum of the advisor asset management fee plus other operating expenses, paid during the previous fiscal year exceed the greater of: (i) 2% of the Company's average invested assets for that fiscal year. (Average invested assets is the average of the total book value of

66


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001

our assets invested in equity interest and loans secured by real estate, before depreciation, reserve for bad debt or other similar non-cash reserves. The Company will compute the average invested assets by taking the average of these values at the end of each month for which the Company is calculating the fee), or (ii) 25% of the Company's net income, before any additions to or allowances for reserves, depreciation, amortization, bad debts or other similar non-cash reserves and before any gain from the sale of our assets, for that fiscal year; plus (2) an amount, which will not exceed the advisor asset management fee for that year, equal to any difference between the total amount of distributions to stockholders for that year and a 7% minimum annual return on the net investment of stockholders. For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000 the Company incurred $5,293,000, none, and $120,000 of asset management fees, of which $2,000,000 was unpaid at December 31, 2002. The Company neither paid nor accrued such fees, for the year ended December 31, 2001 because the Advisor indicated that it would forego such fees.

 

The property managers, entities owned principally by individuals who are affiliates of the Advisor, are entitled to receive property management fees totaling 4.5% of gross operating income, for management and leasing services. The Company incurred and paid property management fees of $4,870,084, $1,605,492 and $926,978 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. None remained unpaid as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

In December, 2001 and January, 2002, an affiliate of the Advisor guaranteed the mortgages payable pertaining to Douglasville Pavilion, Southlake Pavilion, Fayetteville Pavilion, and Sarasota Pavilion, all of which matured in July, 2002. The Company agreed to pay the affiliate 1/8% per annum of the guaranteed amount for providing such a guarantee. As of December 31, 2002, $56,639 of guarantee fees related to the LLC's had been incurred, of which none remained unpaid at December 31, 2002. All of the respective mortgages payable were paid off in June, 2002.

(4)  Stock Option Plan and Soliciting Dealer Warrants

The Company adopted an Independent Director Stock Option Plan which, subject to certain conditions, provides for the grant to each Independent Director of an option to acquire 3,000 Shares following their becoming a Director and for the grant of additional options to acquire 500 Shares on the date of each annual stockholders' meeting commencing with the annual meeting in 2000 if the Independent Director is a member of the board of directors on such date. The options for the initial 3,000 Shares are exercisable as follows: 1,000 Shares on the date of grant and 1,000 Shares on each of the first and second anniversaries of the date of grant. The subsequent options will be exercisable on the second anniversary of the date of grant. The initial options will be exercisable at $9.05 per Share. The subsequent options will be exercisable at the fair market value of a Share on the last business day preceding the annual meeting of stockholders. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, options to acquire 13,500 and 12,000 Shares of common stock were outstanding.

In addition to sales commissions, the dealer manager of the Offering ("an affiliate of the Advisor") has the right to purchase one soliciting dealer warrant for $.0008 for each 25 Shares sold by such soliciting dealer during the Offering, subject to state and federal securities laws and subject to the issuance of a maximum of 2,000,000 soliciting dealers warrants to purchase an equivalent number of Shares with respect to the Initial and first Follow-On Offerings and the issuance of a maximum of 6,000,000 Soliciting Dealer Warrants to purchase an equivalent number of shares with respect to the second Follow-On Offering. The dealer manager intends to reallow such warrants to the soliciting dealers who sold such shares. The holder of a soliciting dealer warrant will be entitled to purchase one Share from the Company at a price of $12 during the period commencing one year from the date of the first issuance of any of the soliciting dealer warrants and ending five years after the effective date of each offering. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, 4,788,966 and

1,410,473 warrants, respectively, had been issued. At December 31, 2002, these warrants had nominal value and none had been exercised.

67


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001

(5)  Leases

Master Lease Agreements

In conjunction with certain acquisitions, the Company receives payments under master lease agreements pertaining to some non-revenue producing spaces at the time of purchase, for periods ranging from one to three years after the date of the purchase or until the spaces are leased. GAAP requires that as these payments are received, they be recorded as a reduction in the purchase price of the respective property rather than as rental income. The cumulative amount of such payments was $3,993,746 and $2,213,644 as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Operating Leases

Minimum lease payments to be received in the future under operating leases, excluding rental income under master lease agreements and assuming no expiring leases are renewed, are as follows:

   

Minimum Lease

   

    Payments    

2003

$

142,171,830

2004

 

135,515,353

2005

 

126,395,667

2006

 

118,479,077

2007

 

106,967,369

Thereafter

 

       782,161,867

Total

$

1,411,691,163

   

===========

The remaining lease terms range from one year to 25 years. Pursuant to the lease agreements, tenants of the property are required to reimburse the Company for some or all of their pro rata share of the real estate taxes, operating expenses and

management fees of the properties. Such amounts are included in additional rental income.

Certain tenant leases contain provisions providing for stepped rent increases and rent abatements. GAAP requires the Company to record rental income for the period of occupancy using the effective monthly rent, which is the average monthly rent for the entire period of occupancy during the term of the lease. As a direct result of recording the effective monthly rent, the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include a net increase in rental income of $2,212,908,

$746,929 and $493,180 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 respectively. The related accounts and rents receivable as of December 31, 2002, and 2001 were $3,588,133 and $1,375,225, respectively. The Company anticipates collecting these amounts over the terms of the related leases as scheduled rent payments are made.

68


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001

 

(6)  Mortgages Payable

Mortgages payable consist of the following at December 31, 2002 and 2001:

Property as collateral:

Interest

Balance at

Rate at

Maturity

December 31,

December 31,

Fixed Rate Mortgages Payable

12/31/02

Date

2002

2001

Aberdeen Square

6.25%

Jan-07

3,670,000

3,670,000

Abernathy Square

6.29%

Mar-09

13,392,000

--

Anderson Central

7.63%

Sep-03

11,000,000

11,000,000

Bass Pro Outdoor World

5.93%

Aug-09

9,100,000

--

Brandon Boulevard Shoppes

6.24%

Mar-09

5,137,000

--

Casselberry Commons

7.64%

Apr-06

8,703,000

8,703,000

Chesterfield Crossings  

5.50%

Sep-09

6,380,000

--

Chickasaw Trails Shopping Center

6.26%

Nov-06

4,400,000

4,400,000

Circuit City Plaza  

5.50%

Sep-09

6,275,000

--

Circuit City Rome  

5.50%

Sep-09

2,470,000

--

Circuit City Vero Beach  

5.50%

Sep-09

3,120,000

--

Clayton Corners

7.25%

Apr-12

9,850,000

--

Columbia Promenade

7.61%

Feb-06

3,600,000

3,600,000

Countryside

6.54%

Jun-06

4,300,000

4,300,000

Cox Creek

7.09%

Mar-12

15,251,565

--

Crystal Springs

6.15%

Aug-09

4,070,000

--

Duvall Village

7.04%

Oct-12

9,476,625

--

Eckerd - Greenville

6.30%

Aug-09

1,540,400

--

Eckerd - Spartanburg

6.30%

Aug-09

1,541,600

--

Eisenhower Crossing

6.09%

Jan-07

16,375,000

16,375,000

Eisenhower Crossing II

6.12%

Jan-07

7,425,000

--

Forestdale Plaza

4.91%

Jan-10

3,319,000

--

Gateway Market Center

7.94%

Aug-05

10,425,000

10,425,000

Hairston Crossing

5.99%

Jul-09

3,655,000

--

Hampton Point

5.50%

Sep-09

2,475,000

--

Hillsboro Square

5.50%

Sep-09

12,100,000

--

Kmart

6.80%

Jun-06

4,655,000

4,655,000

69


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001

Interest

Balance at

Rate at

Maturity

December 31,

December 31,

Fixed Rate Mortgages Payable

12/31/02

Date

2002

2001

Lake Olympia Square

8.25%

Apr-07

5,478,984

5,631,788

Lake Walden Square

7.63%

Nov-07

9,699,828

9,825,487

Lakeview Plaza

8.00%

Mar-18

3,613,237

--

Lowe's Home Improvement Center

6.80%

Jun-06

4,845,000

4,845,000

McFarland Plaza  

5.50%

Sep-09

8,425,000

--

Melbourne Shopping Center

7.68%

Mar-09

5,947,967

--

Merchants Square

7.25%

Nov-08

3,167,437

3,167,437

Northpoint Marketplace  

5.50%

Sep-09

4,535,000

--

Oleander Shopping Center

7.80%

Nov-11

3,000,000

--

PETsMART-Chattanooga, TN

7.37%

Jun-08

1,303,800

1,303,800

PETsMART-Daytona Beach, FL

7.37%

Jun-08

1,361,200

1,361,200

PETsMART-Fredericksburg, VA

7.37%

Jun-08

1,435,000

1,435,000

Pleasant Hill

7.35%

Jun-05

17,120,000

17,120,000

Presidential Commons

6.80%

Dec-07

24,066,555

--

Presidential Commons

2.50%

Nov-06

2,000,000

--

Riverstone Plaza  

5.50%

Sep-09

17,600,000

--

Rosedale Shopping Center

7.94%

Jun-11

13,300,000

--

Sand Lake Corners

6.80%

Jun-08

11,900,000

11,900,000

Sexton Commons

4.50%

Dec-09

4,400,000

--

Sharon Greens

6.07%

Sep-09

6,500,000

--

Shoppes at Lake Mary

4.91%

Jan-10

6,250,000

--

Shoppes on the Circle

7.92%

Nov-10

12,200,088

--

Southlake Shopping Center

7.25%

Nov-08

7,683,755

--

Sycamore Commons

5.11%

Sep-09

20,000,000

--

Target Center

6.02%

Aug-09

4,192,000

--

Town Center Commons

7.00%

Apr-06

4,750,000

4,750,000

Walk at Highwoods I  

5.50%

Sep-09

13,230,000

--

Wakefield Crossing  

4.50%

Dec-09

5,920,000

--

Ward's Crossing

5.50%

Sep-09

6,090,000

--

West Oaks

6.80%

Jun-06

4,900,000

4,900,000

Total Fixed Rate Mortgages Payable

 

 

 

$ 418,621,041

$ 133,367,712

 70


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001

 

Interest

Balance at

Rate at

Maturity

December 31,

December 31,

Variable Rate Mortgages payable

12/31/02

Date

2002

2001

Bartow Marketplace

3.09%

Sep-06

13,475,000

13,475,000

Boynton Commons

3.07%

Mar-08

15,125,000

15,125,000

Bridgewater Marketplace

3.36%

Sep-06

2,987,500

2,987,500

Citrus Hills

3.31%

Feb-07

3,000,000

--

Columbia Promenade

N/A

Feb-02

--

1,800,000

Conway Plaza

3.03%

Jun-05

5,000,000

5,000,000

Creekwood Crossings  

N/A

Mar-03

--

14,000,000

Creekwood Crossings  

4.00%

Mar-07

11,750,000

--

Douglasville Pavilion  

N/A

Jul-02

--

20,000,000

Douglasville Pavilion  

3.11%

Jul-07

14,925,000

--

Douglasville Pavilion  

3.11%

Jul-03

1,360,000

--

Fayetteville Pavilion  

N/A

Jul-02

--

20,133,000

Fayetteville Pavilion  

3.11%

Jul-07

15,940,000

--

Fayetteville Pavilion  

3.11%

Jul-03

1,450,000

--

Gateway Market Center

N/A

Aug-02

--

5,212,500

Jo-Ann Fabrics

3.07%

Aug-08

2,450,000

2,450,000

Just For Feet-Augusta

3.18%

Mar-07

1,668,000

--

Just For Feet-Covington

3.18%

Mar-07

1,885,000

--

Just For Feet-Daytona

3.19%

Sep-06

2,000,000

2,000,000

Lakewood Ranch

3.29%

Oct-09

4,400,000

--

Newnan Pavilion  

3.11%

Jul-07

18,999,243

--

Newnan Pavilion  

3.11%

Jul-03

1,727,128

--

Sarasota Pavilion  

3.46%

Jul-07

19,000,000

--

Sarasota Pavilion  

3.46%

Jul-07

2,000,000

--

Sarasota Pavilion  

4.46%

Jul-03

8,850,000

--

Skyview Plaza

3.31%

Nov-06

10,875,000

10,875,000

Southlake Pavilion  

3.11%

Jul-07

31,723,316

--

Southlake Pavilion  

3.11%

Jul-03

2,879,393

--

Southlake Pavilion  

N/A

Jul-02

--

8,500,000

Southlake Pavilion  

N/A

Jul-02

--

31,240,000

Steeplechase Plaza

2.94%

Apr-07

4,651,350

--

Stonebridge Square

3.18%

Jul-07

10,900,000

--

Turkey Creek Phase I  

3.11%

Jul-03

1,100,000

--

Turkey Creek  Phase I

3.11%

Jul-07

12,120,000

--

Universal Plaza  

4.00%

Apr-07

4,970,000

--

Venture Pointe  

N/A

Jul-02

--

13,333,600

Venture Pointe  

3.11%

Jul-07

14,475,000

--

Venture Pointe   

3.11%

Jul-03

1,315,000

--

Woodstock Square

3.26%

Aug-08

14,000,000

14,000,000

Total Variable Rate Mortgages Payable

 

 

$ 257,000,930

$ 180,131,600

Total Mortgages Payable

$ 675,621,971

$ 313,499,312

============

============

71


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001

 

 

The Company believes it can achieve the optimum balance between risk and return to its shareholders by leveraging its properties at approximately 50% of their value. The Company also believes that it can borrow at the lowest overall cost of funds by placing individual financing on each of the properties. Accordingly, mortgage loans have generally been placed on each property at the time that the property is purchased, or shortly thereafter, with the property securing the financing.

The majority of the Company's loans require monthly payments of interest only, although some loans require principal and interest payments as well as reserves for taxes, insurance, and certain other costs. Interest on variable-rate loans are currently based on LIBOR plus a spread ranging from 150 to 185 basis points. Fixed-rate loans bear interest based on corresponding treasury instruments plus a spread of 130 to 175 basis points. Variable-rate loans may be prepaid without penalty, while fixed-rate loans may be prepaid with a penalty after specific lockout periods.

During 2002, the Company closed on or assumed debt with a principal amount of $538,604,975 and retired debt in the amount of $176,482,316. The average cost of funds for 2002 was approximately 5.3%. The Company also maintained two lines of credit in the aggregate amount of $64 million, of which no funds were outstanding as of December 31, 2002.

Although the loans placed by the Company are generally non-recourse, occasionally, when it is deemed to be advantageous, the Company may guarantee all or a portion of the debt on a full-recourse basis. At times, the Company has borrowed funds financed as part of a cross-collateralized package, with cross-default provisions, in order to enhance the financial benefits. In those circumstances, one or more of the properties may secure the debt of another of the Company's properties.

Individual decisions regarding interest rates, loan-to-value, fixed versus variable-rate financing, maturity dates and related matters are often based on the condition of the financial markets at the time the debt is placed.

72


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001

 

The following table shows the debt maturing during the next five years and the weighted average interest rate as of December 31, 2002 related to that debt.

 

  2003  

  2004  

  2005  

  2006  

  2007  

 Thereafter 

             

Maturing debt:

           

  Fixed rate debt

$11,854,108

$1,034,419

$28,659,792 

$43,535,808

$66,541,345

$266,995,569

  Variable rate debt

18,681,521

--

5,000,000  

29,337,500

168,006,909

35,975,000

             

Average interest rate on debt:

           

  Fixed rate debt

7.62%

7.51%

7.57%

6.80%

6.75%

6.21%

  Variable rate debt

3.75%

N/A

3.03%

3.20%

3.25%

3.17%

The principal balance of $257,000,930 or 38% of the Company's mortgages payable at December 31, 2002, have variable interest rates averaging 3.27%. An increase in the variable interest rate on certain mortgages payable constitutes a market risk.

The Company paid off all of the debt that matured during 2002. The maturing debt was repaid primarily from the new financing obtained. The replacement financing obtained were for amounts which differ from the loans retired, either producing or requiring cash on a property by property basis.

 

(7) Note payable

On November 30, 2001, the Company issued a note payable related to the purchase of Eisenhower Crossing. The note was payable and was repaid when the seller met certain leasing conditions, which occurred in May 2002.

 

(8) Development and Mortgage Notes Receivable

On December 21, 2000 the Company funded a $1,100,000 mortgage note receivable on a 49,749 square foot shopping center known as Universal Plaza which was under construction, located in Lauderhill, Florida. The principal amount of $1,100,000 was secured by a second mortgage on the property and personal guaranties of the borrower. The interest rate of the note was 10% per annum and was due to mature August 31, 2002. On January 30, 2002, the Company exercised its option to purchase this property and this mortgage note receivable was fully repaid to the Company from the seller's proceeds at closing.

On April 29, 2002, the Company funded a $2,475,000 second mortgage note receivable which will be used by the borrower for the redevelopment of a shopping center known as Midway Plaza. The note maintains a stated interest rate of 10% per annum and matures the earlier of May 31, 2003 or the date upon which the property is sold, transferred or conveyed by the borrower. The note requires monthly payments of interest only and a final balloon payment due at maturity. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the monthly interest payments are to be drawn from a reserve the borrower was required to establish. This $268,125 reserve was retained by the Company as a reduction of the principal distributed to the borrower. The Company, at its option, may elect to purchase the shopping center upon completion of the redevelopment.

73


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001

 

On August 29, 2002, the Company assumed a mortgage note receivable to fund a maximum of $44,000,000 used by the borrower for the construction of a shopping center known as Westside Centre Shopping Center in Huntsville, Alabama. The note maintains a stated interest rate of 9.25% per annum and matures on April 2, 2003. The note requires monthly interest payments only and a final balloon payment due at maturity. Payments to reduce the outstanding principal are allowed, and additional draws are also possible, as long as the outstanding balance does not exceed $44,000,000. The note receivable balance at December 31, 2002 is $44,000,000. The Company, at its option, may elect to purchase the shopping center upon completion of the development.

On October 28, 2002, the Company agreed to fund a development receivable for a maximum of $1,295,000 for the tenant buildout at a shopping center known as Southlake Pavilion in Morrow, Georgia. The note maintains a stated interest rate of 9.00% per annum and matures on December 31, 2005. The note requires monthly interest payments only and a final balloon payment due at maturity. Payments to reduce the outstanding principal are allowed, and additional draws are also possible, as long as the outstanding balance does not exceed $1,295,000. The note receivable outstanding balance at December 31, 2002 is $734,438.

On October 31, 2002, the Company funded a mortgage note receivable on 19 Eckerd stores located in Pennsylvania, New York, and West Virginia totaling 210,906 square feet. The principal amount of $53,000,000 was secured by first mortgages on the properties. The interest rate of the note was 5.6% per annum and was due to mature January 8, 2003. On January 8, 2003, the Company exercised its option to purchase these properties and this mortgage note receivable was fully repaid to the Company.

On November 19, 2002, the Company agreed to fund a second mortgage note receivable for $7,000,000 to be used by the borrower for the construction of a shopping center known as Westside Centre in Huntsville, Alabama. The note maintains a stated rate of interest of 9.00% per annum and matures on April 2, 2003. The note requires monthly interest payments only and a final balloon payment due at maturity. Payments to reduce the outstanding principal are allowed, and additional draws are also possible, as long as the outstanding balance does not exceed $7,000,000. The note receivable balance at December 31, 2002 is $1,500,017. The Company, at its option, may elect to purchase the shopping center upon completion of the development.

On December 18, 2002, the Company agreed to fund a development receivable for a maximum of $2,100,000 for tenant buildout relating to H.H. Gregg at Southlake Pavilion in Morrow, Georgia. The note maintains a stated interest rate of 9.00% per annum and matures on December 31, 2005. The note required monthly interest payments only and a final balloon payment due at maturity. Payments to reduce the outstanding principal are allowed, and additional draws are also possible, as long as the outstanding balance does not exceed $2,100,000. The note receivable outstanding balance at December 31, 2002 is $193,925.

 74


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001

(9)  Investment in Joint Ventures

On September 28, 2001, the Company acquired a 65% membership interest in Hendon Stonebridge, LLC for approximately $2,860,000. Hendon Stonebridge, LLC owns 100% of a fee simple interest in one retail property known as Stonebridge Square Shopping Center. The Company also had an option, exercisable not sooner than April 1, 2002 and not later than May 15, 2002, to acquire the remaining 35% interest in Hendon Stonebridge, LLC for the remainder of the purchase price, not to exceed $21,260,659 in total. Prior to the Company's exercise of its option, the Company received a preferred cash return, paid monthly, at an annualize rate of 15% on the investment and accounted for its investment in accordance with APB Opinion No. 18, "The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock." The Company used the equity method of accounting for its LLC investment in Stonebridge since the Company had significant influence over, but not control of, the major operating financial policies of the property. Under this method, the Company's share of income or loss incurred by the property was recognized as an increase or reduction of the carrying value of the investment but the loss recognized, if any, did not exceed the Company's investment basis. For the year ending December 31, 2001, the Company received $111,658 of distributions all of which was recognized as income. On June 12, 2002, the Company elected to exercise its option and acquired the remaining 35% interest in Hendon Stonebridge, LLC, and accordingly consolidated the investment.

(10)  Segment Reporting

The Company owns and seeks to acquire multi-tenant shopping centers in the southeastern states, primarily Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina. All of the Company's shopping centers are currently located in Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, Tennessee, Alabama, Louisiana, Maryland and Texas. The Company's shopping centers are typically anchored by grocery and drugstores complemented with additional stores providing a wide range of other goods and services to shoppers.

 

The Company assesses and measures operating results on an individual property basis for each of its properties based on net property operations. Since all of the Company's properties exhibit highly similar economic characteristics, cater to the day-to-day living needs of their respective surrounding communities, and offer similar degrees of risk and opportunities for growth, the properties have been aggregated and reported as one operating segment.

75


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001

 

The net property operations and net income are summarized in the following tables as of and for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, along with reconciliation to net income.

   

            2002            

            2001            

            2000            

         

Property rental and additional rental income

$

111,511,248

35,273,231

21,083,571

Other property operating income

 

560,081

250,183

76,836

Total property operating expenses

 

27,614,507

10,177,996

6,279,162

Mortgage interest

 

23,507,709

                9,712,221

              8,126,587

         

Net property operations

 

60,949,113

              15,633,197

              6,754,658

         

Interest and dividend income

 

4,411,158

2,103,810

845,013

Other income/(loss)

 

(471,721)

127,539

118,493

Less non-property expenses:

       

  Professional services

 

915,333

377,834

188,295

         

General and administrative expenses

 

1,439,274

676,500

448,451

Acquisition cost expenses

 

350,260

164,788

148,494

Advisor asset management fee

 

5,293,000

--

120,000

Depreciation and amortization

 

29,395,397

         8,652,781

        4,752,410

         

Net income

$

27,495,286

7,992,643

2,060,514

   

=============

=============

=============

         

The following table summarizes property asset information as of December 31, 2002 and 2001

         
   

December 31, 2002

December 31, 2001

 

Total assets:

       

  Shopping centers

$

1,458,943,957

581,603,762

 

  Non-segment assets

 

308,744,402

              49,984,057

 
         
 

$

1,767,688,359

631,587,819

 
   

=============

=============

 

 

76


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001

(11)  Earnings per Share

Basic earnings per share ("EPS") is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is computed by reflecting the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the Company.

As of December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, warrants to purchase 4,788,966, 1,410,473 and 506,713, respectively, shares of common stock at a price of $12.00 per share were outstanding, respectively. These warrants were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the exercise price of such warrants was greater than the average market price of common shares. The weighted average numbers of common shares outstanding were 70,243,809, 21,682,783 and 8,590,250 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

 

(12) Commitments and Contingencies

On February 18, 2002, the Company entered into a development agreement with an unaffiliated third party to develop a shopping center on 27 acres of land located in Newport Richey, Florida. The center, known as the Shoppes at Golden Acres, will be developed in two phases. Phase I development has commenced and consists of approximately 76,370 square feet of leasable space. Phase I costs are expected to be approximately $119 per square foot of leasable space; these costs include the developer's profit and the costs of the land for Phase II. Total costs incurred through December 31, 2002 including land, amounted to $11,304,931 of which $474,197 remained unpaid at December 31, 2002. The total cost may be adjusted upward or downward based on the actual lease rates achieved. Phase II development is contingent upon the satisfaction of certain conditions including, but not limited to, a minimum percentage leased and the Company's approval of the Phase II construction budget. Phase II will consist of approximately 44,400 square feet of leasable space. The Company funded the purchase of the land and the development costs; however, the Company expects to place financing on the property at a later date.

On April 15, 2002, the Company acquired two separate land parcels in order to construct two freestanding retail properties to be leased as Eckerd Drug Stores for approximately 24,700 gross leasable square feet. The land parcels were acquired from an unaffiliated third party for $2,078,261. The Company funded the purchase of the land and the development costs; however, the Company expects to place financing on the properties at a later date. The parcels are located in Concord, North Carolina and Tega City, South Carolina. Total costs incurred through December 31, 2002, including land, amounted to approximately $5,091,645 of which $615,709 remained unpaid at December 31, 2002.

On July 1, 2002, the Company acquired 2.3 acres of land and simultaneously contracted for the development of a freestanding retail building to be leased as an Eckerd's Drug Store. The parcel was acquired from an unaffiliated third party for approximately $1,165,000. The Company funded the purchase of the land and the development costs; however, the Company expects to finance the property at a later date. The total acquisition cost after development is expected to be approximately $3,053,000 for 13,800 gross leasable square feet. The parcel is located in Woodruff, South Carolina. Total costs incurred through December 31, 2002, including land, amounted to approximately $2,882,115 of which $406,907 remained unpaid at December 31, 2002.

77


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001

On September 12, 2002, the Company acquired 3.1 acres of land and simultaneously contracted for the development of a freestanding retail building to be leased as an Eckerd's Drug Store. The parcel was acquired from an unaffiliated third party for approximately $1,053,000. The Company funded the purchase of the land and the development costs; however, the Company expects to finance the property at a later date. The total acquisition cost after development is expected to be approximately $2,856,000 for 10,908 gross leasable square feet. The parcel is located in Raleigh, North Carolina. Total costs incurred through December 31, 2002, including land, amounted to approximately $1,774,715 of which $262,136 remained unpaid at December 31, 2002.

On October 18, 2002, the Company acquired approximately 14.2 acres of land and simultaneously contracted for the development of a new Publix store and some shopping space. The parcel was acquired from an unaffiliated third party for approximately $800,000. The Company funded the purchase of the land and the development costs; however, the Company expects to finance the property at a later date. The total acquisition cost after development is expected to be approximately $6,883,502 for 62,500 gross leasable square feet. The parcel is located in Tallahassee, Florida. Total costs incurred through December 31, 2002, including land, amounted to approximately $1,936,935 of which $ 434,718 remained unpaid at December 31, 2002.

On November 12, 2002, the Company acquired 9.84 acres of land and simultaneously contracted for the development of a new Publix store and some shopping space. The parcel was acquired from an unaffiliated third party for approximately $2,492,776. The Company funded the purchase of the land and the development costs; however, the Company expects to finance the property at a later date. The total acquisition cost after development is expected to be approximately $9,010,787 for 77,900 gross leasable square feet. The parcel is located in Tyrone, Georgia. Total costs incurred through December 31, 2002, including land, amounted to approximately $2,762,315 of which $241,020 remained unpaid at December 31, 2002.

On December 23, 2002, the Company acquired 2.6 acres of land and simultaneously contracted for the development of a freestanding retail building to be leased as an Eckerd's Drug Store. The parcel was acquired from an unaffiliated third party for approximately $990,000. The Company funded the purchase of the land and the development costs; however, the Company expects to finance the property at a later date. The total acquisition cost after development is expected to be approximately $2,813,000 for 13,813 gross leasable square feet. The parcel is located in Gaffney, South Carolina. Total costs incurred through December 31, 2002, including land, amounted to approximately $1,173,111 of which $45,900 remained unpaid at December 31, 2002.

We are subject, from time to time, to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. While the resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes, based on currently available information, that the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

 

(13) Subsequent Events

The Company paid distributions of $8,281,370, $8,953,611 and $8,784,158 to its stockholders in January, February, and March 2003, respectively.

The Company issued 28,631,178 Shares of Common Stock from December 31, 2002 through March 18, 2003, resulting in a total of 150,944,516 Shares of Common Stock outstanding. As a result, as of March 18, 2003, subscriptions for a total of 147,234,289 Shares were received resulting in total gross offering proceeds of $1,471,812,072 and an additional 4,261,753 Shares were issued pursuant to the DRP for $40,486,653 of additional gross proceeds. The Company has repurchased 551,526 Shares through its Share Repurchase Program for $5,154,834.

 78


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001

The Company has signed an application for a $100,000,000 line of credit with Key Bank. Fundings under the line of credit will require interest payments based on a margin range depending upon certain provisions contained in the credit agreement. To date, the Company has not drawn on the line of credit.

The Company has acquired the following properties during the period January 1 to March 18, 2003. The respective acquisitions are summarized in the table below.

Date

Year

Approximate Purchase Price

Gross Leasable Area

Acquired

Property

Type

Built

      ($)       

(Sq. Ft.)

Major Tenants

02/28/03

Capital Crossing
  Raleigh, NC

NC

1995

9,960,000

92,200

Lowe's Food Store
Staples

02/28/03

Colonial Bardmore   Promenade
  Largo, FL

NC

1991

17,100,000

152,667

Publix

02/28/03

Eckerd Drug Store
  Piedmont, SC

SU

2000

1,956,000

10,908

Eckerd Drug Store

02/28/03

Suwanee Crossroads
  Suwanee, GA

NC

2002

12,130,000

69,500

Dollar Tree

02/28/03

Concord Crossing
  Concord, NC

NC

1994

5,300,000

55,930

Bi-Lo Supermarket
CVS Drug Store

02/28/03

Monroe Shopping Center
  Monroe, NC

NC

1994

3,520,000

45,080

Bi-Lo Supermarket

02/28/03

Paraiso Plaza
  Hialeah, FL

NC

1997

9,650,000

61,012

Publix

02/28/03

Sheridan Square
  Dania, FL

NC

1991

7,550,000

67,425

Publix
Dollar Tree

02/28/03

Windsor Court Shopping Center
  Windsor, CT

NC

1993

14,605,000

78,480

Stop & Shop
Blockbuster
Radio Shack

02/27/03

The Overlook at King of Prussia
  King of Prussia, PA

NC

2002

57,000,000

186,980

Best Buy
Nordstrom Rack
Regal Entertainment
  Theatre (ground lease)

02/14/03

Sharon Greens Outlot
  Cumming, GA

D

N/A

575,000

N/A

N/A

02/06/03

Commonwealth Center II
  Richmond, VA

NC

2002

22,275,000

175,392

Barnes & Noble
Steinmart
Michael's

02/05/03

Market Place at Mill Creek
  Buford, GA

NC

2000/1
2002/3

50,390,000

397,354

Toys 'R Us
BORDER=0s
Linens 'N Things
Michael's

79


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001

Date

Year

Approximate Purchase Price

Gross Leasable Area

Acquired

Property

Type

Built

     ($)    

(Sq. Ft.)

Major Tenants

02/05/03

Stonecrest Marketplace
  Lithonia, GA

NC

2002

35,610,000

263,399

Babies 'R Us
Linens 'N Things
Ross Dress
Marshalls

02/04/03

Oakley Plaza
  Asheville, NC

NC

1988

9,400,000

118,727

Bi-Lo Supermarket
CVS Pharmacy

01/21/03

Springfield Park
  Lawrenceville, GA

NC

1992/
2000

10,875,000

105,321

Hobby Lobby
LA Fitness

1/21/03

Market Square
  Douglasville, GA

NC

1974/
1990

13,050,000

121,774

Office Depot
Petco
Hancock Fabrics

1/17/03

Tequesta Shoppes Plaza
  Tequesta, FL

NC

1986

11,477,000

109,937

Publix
Bealls Outlet

1/17/03

Camp Hill
  Harrisburg, PA

NC

1978/
2002

7,800,000

58,180

Michael's
Linens 'N Things

01/08/03

Eckerd Drug Store Portfolio of 19 Stores

SU

1999/
2000

  Amherst, NY
  Buffalo, NY
  Cheektowaga, NY
  Dunkirk, NY
  Cheswick, PA
  Connellsville, PA
  Erie, PA
  Erie, PA
  Erie, PA
  Millcreek, PA
  Millcreek, PA
  Harborcreek,PA
  Monroeville, PA
  Monroeville, PA
  New Castle, PA
  Penn, PA
  Pittsburgh, PA
  Plum, PA
  Weirton,WV

SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU
SU

2,775,000
3,112,000
3,718,000
1,700,000
2,754,000
3,458,000
2,881,000
2,958,000
4,139,000
3,681,000
1,626,000
2,493,000
5,362,000
3,272,000
2,839,000
2,911,000
3,791,000
3,622,000
2,458,000

10,908
12,732
10,908
10,908
10,908
10,908
10,908
10,908
10,908
10,908
10,908
10,908
12,738
10,908
10,908
10,908
10,908
10,908
10,908

Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store
Eckerd Drug Store

   

Type of Property

 

NC

Neighborhood and Community Multi-Tenant Retail Shopping Center

SU

Single User Retail Property

 D

Development Project

80


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001

The assumed mortgage debt and financings obtained subsequent to December 31, 2002, are detailed in the list below.

Date Funded

Mortgage Payable

Annual Interest Rate
at 12/31/02

Maturity Date

Principal Borrowed
        ($)        

         

3/11/03

Harundale Plaza
Glen Burnie, MD

4.64%

4/2010

12,362,000

         

3/11/03

North Aiken Bi-Lo
Aiken, SC

4.64%

4/2010

2,900,000

         

2/27/03

The Overlook at King of Prussia
  King of Prussia, PA

4.60%

03/2008

30,000,000

         

2/21/03

Marketplace at Mill Creek
  Buford, GA

1.85% over 30 days LIBOR

08/2003

28,900,000

         

2/21/03

Stonecrest Marketplace
  Lithonia, GA

1.85% over 30 days LIBOR

08/2003

20,000,000

         

2/19/03

Woodstock Square
  Woodstock, GA

1.75% over 30 day LIBOR

02/19/04

6,700,000

         

2/19/03

The Fountains
  Plantation, FL

1.75% over 30 day LIBOR

03/27/04

13,999,900

         

2/18/03

Forest Hills
  Wilson, NC

4.49%

03/2010

3,660,000

         

2/18/03

Gateway Plaza
  Jacksonville, NC

4.82%

03/2010

6,500,000

         

1/28/03

Market Square Shopping Center
  Douglasville, GA

7.02%

10/2008

8,390,000

         

1/8/03

Eckerds - Pool A
  Various Locations

4.94%

02/2010

9,874,000

         

1/8/03

Eckerds - Pool B
  Various Locations

4.97%

02/2010

9,490,000

         

1/8/03

Eckerds - Pool C
  Various Locations

4.97%

02/2010

7,537,000

 81


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001

The Company anticipates purchasing the following properties from unaffiliated third parties. The Company intends to purchase these properties with its own funds unless noted otherwise; however, the Company expects to place financing on the properties at a later date.

Year

Estimated Purchase Price including expenses

Gross Leasable Area

Property

Type

Built

($) (1)

(Sq. Ft.)

Comment

Major Tenants (2)

             

Watercolor Crossings
  Watercolor, FL

D

To be built

7,248,000

43,200

 

Publix

             

Berry Town Center
  Davenport, FL

D

To be built

8,118,000

61,421

 

Publix--

             

The Fountains
  Plantation, FL

NC

1989

66,139,000

408,807

(3)

Marshall's

             

Legacy Place
  Palm Beach Gardens, FL

D

To be built

73,480,000

308,500

 

Linens N Things

Creeks at Virginia Center
  Richmond, VA

NC

2001

39,000,000

266,359

 

Bed, Bath & Beyond
Dick's Sporting Goods

             

Lowe's Food/Stockbridge   Commons
  Tega Cay, SC

NC

2003

10,605,000

79,100

 

Lowe's Food

             

Hartsville Crossing
  Shopping Center
  Hartsville, SC

NC

2001

7,474,000

71,120

 

Goody's

             

Midway Plaza

NC

1985

26,200,000

220,259

Publix

  Tamarac, FL

Ross

Turkey Creek Pavilion

NC

2002

10,573,000

82,940

Ross

  Phase II

  Knoxville, TN

Westside Pavilion

NC

2002

56,057,000

504,364

(11)

--

  Huntsville, AL

Walk at Highwood
  Preserve Phase II

NC

2003

6,577,000

28,427

Boston Market

  Tampa, FL

Publix Center

NC

2003

11,828,000

100,838

Publix

  Easley, SC

Ross

82


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001

 

   

Year

Estimated Purchase Price including expenses

Gross Leasable Area

   

Property

Type

Built

($) (1)

(Sq. Ft.)

Comment

Major Tenants (2)

             

Westin Center
  Fayetteville, NC

NC

1995

5,800,000

69,950

(4)

Food Lion
CVS/Pharmacy
Family Dollar Store

             

Parkaire Landing
  Marietta, GA

NC

1996

19,534,000

160,881

(5)

World on Ice
Royal Gourmet

Coleman Village
  Roswell, GA

NC

2000

15,989,000

90,958

 

Kroger

             

Old Alabama
  Alpharetta, GA

NC

2000

19,339,000

89,117

 

Fresh Market
Walgreens
LA Fitness

             

Centennial Village
  Roswell, GA

NC

1999

14,688,000

95,876

 

Kroger

             

Shoppes at Wendover
  Village
  Greensboro, NC

D

To be built

24,000,000

165,932

 

Ross
Home Goods
A.C. Moore

Village Center
  Mount Pleasant, WI

NC

2002/2003

24,000,000

217,103

Jewel Food
Kohl's

Carlisle Commons
  Carlisle, PA

NC

2001

39,200,000

400,640

(6)

Wal-Mart Super Center

Cedar Springs Crossing
  Spartanburg, SC

NC

2001

10,150,000

86,312

Bi-Lo
Eckerds
Dollar Tree

Largo Towne Center
  Largo, MD

NC

1991

30,500,000

260,825

Shoppers Food
  Warehouse
Marshall's
Regency Furniture

Lexington Place
  Lexington, SC

NC

2003

8,397,000

83,167

TJ Maxx
Ross

Starwood Heller New Jersey Portfolio

440 Commons
  Jersey City, NJ

NC

1997

18,085,000

162,533

 

Home Depot
Seaman's Furniture   Store

             

Edgewater Towne Center
  Edgewater, NJ

NC

2000

27,218,000

77,446

(7)

Whole Foods
  Supermarket
Annie Sez

             

83


 

INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001

   

Year

Estimated Purchase Price including expenses

Gross Leasable Area

   

Property

Type

Built

($) (1)

(Sq. Ft.)

Comment

Major Tenants (2)

             

Brick Center Plaza
  Brick, NJ

NC

1999

19,392,000

114,028

 

Bed, Bath & Beyond
Best Buy
Seaman's Furniture
Christian Fine Home
Furnishings

             

East Hanover Plaza
  East Hanover, NJ

NC

1994

17,267,000

97,660

 

Sport Authority
Office Max
Chili's & Macaroni
  Grill
NJ Pet Supply

             

Linden Plaza
  Linden, NJ

NC

1993/2001

31,766,000

275,431

 

Wal-mart
Stop & Shop

             

Route 22 Retail Center
  Union, NJ

NC

1997

18,887,000

110,453

(8)

Circuit City
Baby Superstore
The Furniture King

             

Sony Theatre Complex
  East Hanover, NJ

NC

1993

12,023,000

70,549

 

Chuck E. Cheese
Lowes Cinema

             

West Falls Plaza
  West Paterson, NJ

NC

1995

21,164,000

88,913

 

A & P
6th Avenue Electronics

             

BVT Portfolio

           
             

Publix at Brooker Creek
  Palm Harbor, FL

NC

1994

8,294,000

77,596

(9)

Publix

             

Valley Park Commons
  Hagerstown, MD

NC

1993

12,312,000

89,579

(10)

Martin's Food Store

             

Paradise Portfolio

           
             

Paradise Place
  West Palm Beach, FL

NC

2003

10,873,000

74,620

 

Publix

             

Paradise Promenade
  Davie, FL

NC

2003

12,530,000

70,291

 

Publix

             

Paradise Shoppes of   Ellenwood
  Ellenwood, GA

NC

2003

10,354,000

67,721

 

Publix

             

Plaza Del Paraiso
  Miami, FL

NC

2003

14,050,000

82,291

 

Publix

84


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001

 

   

Year

Estimated Purchase Price including expenses

Gross Leasable Area

   

Property

Type

Built

($) (1)

(Sq. Ft.)

Comment

Major Tenants (2)

             

Shoppes at Lake Dow
  McDonough, GA

NC

2002

10,281,000

73,270

 

Publix

             

Shoppes of Lithia
  Brandon, FL

NC

2003

14,173,000

79,161

 

Publix

             

Shoppes at Paradise
  Point
  Ft. Walton Beach, FL

NC

2001

12,092,000

83,965

 

Publix

  1. The Company's acquisition costs may increase by additional costs, which have not yet been finally determined. The Company expects any additional costs to be insignificant.
  2. Major tenants include tenants leasing more than 10% of the gross leasable area of the individual property.
  3. On February 18, 2003, we funded $44,812,000 as the initial draw of a $53,000,000 committed principal amount, eighteen-month loan, secured by a first mortgage on the Fountains shopping center in Plantation, Florida. The loan accrues interest at a rate of 9.5% per annum on the outstanding principal balance. We intend to acquire this property upon completion of the redevelopment of the property.
  4. As part of the purchase of Westin Center, we will assume the existing debt with a remaining balance of approximately $4,068,000. The loan requires principal and interest payment based on an annual rate of 7.36% and matures in 2011.
  5. As part of the purchase of Parkaire Landing, we will assume the modified existing debt with a remaining balance of approximately $11,676,000. The loan requires monthly interest payments based on an annual rate of 7.0% and matures in 2009.
  6. Initially, we intend to fund a $36,000,000 loan to the seller of Carlisle Commons. The loan will require interest only payments based on a rate of 8.446% per annum and will mature in September 2003. We have the right to acquire this property in September 2003.
  7. The gross leasable area includes 57,984 square feet of residential space, containing 64 apartment units.
  8. As part of the acquisition of the Route 22 Retail Center, we will assume the existing debt with a remaining principal balance of approximately $10,413, 000, after a $914,000 prepayment of principal. The loan requires interest only payments at a rate of 7.49% per annum and matures in 2008.
  9. As part of the purchase of this property, we will assume the existing modified debt with a remaining balance of approximately $4,510,000. The loan will require interest only payments based on an annual rate of 7.875% and will mature December 2004.
  10. 85


    INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
    (a Maryland corporation)

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    (continued)

    December 31, 2002 and 2001

     

  11. The seller is currently negotiating with Martin's Food Store to expand into a portion of the currently vacant space. It is anticipated that the seller will provide a master lease on any vacant space at this property at the time of purchase.

(11) As of March 18, 2003 we have funded $46,054,458 to the developer of Westside Pavilion of the total $51,000,000 committed. Any amount outstanding on this commitment will be repaid at the time we purchase this property, assuming we exercise our right to close.

 

Type of Property

NC  Neighborhood and Community Multi-Tenant Retail Shopping Center

SU  Single User Property

 D  Development Project

 86


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001

(14) Supplemental Financial Information (unaudited)

The following represents the results of operations, for the each quarterly period, during the years 2002 and 2001.

 

                                         2002                                   

 

   Dec. 31  

  Sept. 30  

   June 30  

   March 31  

Total income

40,214,075

30,261,772

24,720,394

20,814,525

Net income

8,800,927

7,485,220

5,928,019

5,281,120

         

Net income, per common share, basic and diluted:

.07

.10

.10

.12

 

                                         2001                                   

 

   Dec. 31  

  Sept. 30  

   June 30  

   March 31  

Total income

12,951,279

9,397,548

8,463,790

6,942,146

Net income

2,816,429

2,045,728

1,888,267

1,242,219

         

Net income, per common share, basic and diluted:

.09

.09

.10

.09

   

 

 

 

87


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)

December 31, 2002 and 2001

 

The Company has acquired a substantial number of properties throughout the years 2002 and 2001. The following table provides unaudited proforma net income based on the assumption that acquisitions were consummated as of the beginning of the period, January 1, 2001. This information is not necessarily indicative of what the actual net property operations and net income would have been, nor does it suggest what future results will be.

 

 

(unaudited)

(unaudited)

            2002            

            2001            

         

Property rental and additional rental income

$

158,986,825

119,459,492

 

Other property operating income

 

592,243

276,605

 

Total property operating expenses

 

38,570,399

28,627,325

 

Mortgage interest

 

30,186,971

              28,065,495

 
         

Net property operations

 

90,821,698

              63,043,277

 
         

Interest and dividend income

 

4,411,158

2,103,810

 

Other income/(loss)

 

(471,721)

166,924

 

Less non-property expenses:

       

  Professional services

 

915,333

377,834

 
         

General and administrative expenses

 

1,439,274

676,500

 

Acquisition cost expense

 

350,260

164,788

 

Advisor asset management fee

 

7,378,040

3,473,465

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

41,547,998

         31,310,998

 
         

Net income

$

43,130,230

29,310,426

 
   

=============

=============

 

88


Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc.
(a Maryland corporation)

Schedule III

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2002

   

Initial Costs (A)

 

Gross amount at which carried at end of period

   
                     
     

Buildings

Adjustments

 

Buildings

       
     

And

To

 

And

 

Accumulated

Date

Date

Multi-tenant Retail

Encumbrance

Land

Improvements

Basis (C)

Land

Improvements

Total (D)

Depreciation (E)

Constructed

Acquired

                     

Aberdeen Square

  Boynton Beach, FL

$ 3,670,000

$ 1,948,473

$ 4,768,166

$ (125,266)

$1,948,473

$ 4,642,900

$ 6,591,373

$ 212,532

1990

10/01

Abernathy Square

  Atlanta, GA

13,392,000

8,054,652

16,076,111

(346,858)

8,054,652

15,729,253

23,783,905

675,554

1983/1994

12/01

Acworth Avenue Retail

  Shopping Center

  Acworth, GA

--

959,257

1,875,198

(21,421)

959,257

1,853,777

2,813,035

82,686

2001

12/00

Anderson Central

  Anderson, SC

11,000,000

2,219,839

13,642,727

(411,842)

2,219,839

13,230,885

15,450,725

589,989

1999

11/01

Bartow Marketplace

  Cartersville, GA

13,475,000

6,098,178

18,308,271

78,339

6,098,178

18,386,610

24,484,787

2,120,157

1995

09/99

Boynton Commons

  Boynton Beach, FL

15,125,000

8,698,355

21,803,370

(21,131)

8,698,355

21,782,239

30,480,594

2,739,515

1998

07/99

Brandon Blvd. Shoppes

  Brandon, FL

5,137,000

1,894,787

7,587,323

(145,568)

1,894,787

7,441,755

9,336,542

314,577

1994

11/01

Bridgewater Marketplace

  Orlando, FL

2,987,500

783,493

5,221,618

(62,782)

783,493

5,158,836

5,942,329

609,566

1998

09/99

Casselberry Commons

  Casselberry, FL

8,703,000

6,702,658

11,191,912

250,644

6,702,658

11,442,556

18,145,214

1,418,428

1973/1998

12/99

Chatham Crossing

  Siler City, NC

--

971,620

2,992,100

(104,139)

971,620

2,887,961

3,859,581

--

2002

12/02

Chesterfield Crossings

  Richmond, VA

6,380,000

2,791,620

8,190,130

(89,954)

2,791,620

8,100,176

10,891,796

199,758

2000

06/02

Chickasaw Trails

  Shopping Center

  Orlando, FL

4,400,000

1,723,260

6,907,737

(108,194)

1,723,260

6,799,543

8,522,804

348,660

1994

08/01

89


Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc.
(a Maryland corporation)

Schedule III

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2002

   

Initial Costs (A)

 

Gross amount at which carried at end of period

   
                     
     

Buildings

Adjustments

 

Buildings

       
     

And

To

 

And

 

Accumulated

Date

Date

Multi-tenant Retail

Encumbrance

Land

Improvements

Basis (C)

Land

Improvements

Total (D)

Depreciation (E)

Constructed

Acquired

Circuit City Plaza

Orlando, FL

$ 6,275,000

$3,756,672

$ 7,761,404

$ (111,424)

$3,756,672

$ 7,649,980

$ 11,406,652

$ 163,512

1999

07/02

Citrus Hills

  Citrus Hills, FL

3,000,000

841,567

5,185,586

(210,707)

841,567

4,974,879

5,816,446

201,985

1994

12/01

City Crossing

  Warner Robins, GA

--

1,893,133

12,750,925

(259,555)

1,893,133

12,491,370

14,384,503

36,571

2001

11/02

Clayton Corners

  Clayton, NC

9,850,000

1,615,060

13,379,346

(517,492)

1,615,060

12,861,854

14,476,914

91,385

1999

11/02

Columbia Promenade

  Kissimmee, FL

3,600,000

1,483,737

5,956,206

(6,206)

1,483,737

5,950,000

7,433,737

471,562

2000

01/01

Columbiana Station

  Columbia, SC

--

7,486,111

39,128,619

(1,017,690)

7,486,111

38,110,929

45,597,040

--

1999

12/02

Comp USA Retail Center

  Newport News, VA

--

2,261,885

5,062,238

(72,395)

2,261,885

4,989,843

7,251,728

18,308

1999

11/02

Conway Plaza

  Orlando, FL

5,000,000

2,215,324

6,332,434

220,268

2,215,324

6,552,702

8,768,026

778,114

1985/1999

02/00

Countryside

  Naples, FL

4,300,000

1,117,428

7,478,173

9,571

1,117,428

7,487,744

8,605,172

899,250

1997

10/99

Cox Creek

  Florence, AL

15,251,565

4,256,549

14,974,285

(217,062)

4,256,549

14,757,223

19,013,772

177,775

2001

09/02

Creekwood Crossing

  Bradenton, FL

11,750,000

6,376,185

17,239,607

(214,153)

6,376,185

17,025,454

23,401,639

756,512

2001

11/01

Crystal Springs

  Shopping Center

  Crystal Springs, FL

4,070,000

1,064,112

6,413,838

(132,598)

1,064,112

6,281,240

7,345,352

173,860

2001

04/02

Douglasville Pavilion

  Douglasville, GA

16,285,000

6,540,781

20,836,192

(537,482)

6,540,781

20,298,710

26,839,491

697,159

1998

12/01

90


Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc.
(a Maryland corporation)

Schedule III

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2002

   

Initial Costs (A)

 

Gross amount at which carried at end of period

   
                     
     

Buildings

Adjustments

 

Buildings

       
     

And

To

 

And

 

Accumulated

Date

Date

Multi-tenant Retail

Encumbrance

Land

Improvements

Basis (C)

Land

Improvements

Total (D)

Depreciation (E)

Constructed

Acquired

Duvall Village

  Bowie, MD

$ 9,476,625

$4,000,000

$ 9,045,904

$ (567,835)

$4,000,000

$ 8,478,069

$ 12,478,069

$ 57,498

1998

12/01

Eisenhower Crossing I & II

  Macon, GA

23,800,000

7,487,472

35,804,354

(617,481)

7,487,472

35,186,873

42,674,345

1,427,255

2001/2002

11/01,03/02

Fayetteville Pavilion

  Fayetteville, NC

17,390,000

7,114,584

19,783,655

92,152

7,343,653

19,646,737

26,990,391

743,387

1998/2001

12/01

Forest Hills Centre

  Wilson, NC

--

1,582,094

5,093,270

(60,720)

868,647

5,745,997

6,614,644

62,606

1989

09/02

Forestdale Plaza

  Jamestown, NC

3,319,000

1,262,754

5,407,118

(98,897)

1,262,754

5,308,221

6,570,975

91,287

2001

08/02

Gateway Market Center

  St. Petersburg, FL

10,425,000

6,351,847

14,576,808

114,644

6,351,847

14,691,452

21,043,299

1,266,249

1999/2000

09/00

Gateway Plaza - Jacksonville

  Jacksonville, NC

--

2,906,103

8,959,217

1,144,923

2,906,103

10,104,141

13,010,244

65,988

2000/2001

11/02

Gateway Plaza - Conway

  Conway, SC

--

912,466

5,382,247

(118,660)

912,466

5,263,587

6,176,053

--

2002

12/02

Golden Gate

  Greensboro, NC

--

3,644,643

6,899,915

832,606

3,644,643

7,732,521

11,377,165

46,597

1962/2002

10/02

Goldenrod Groves

  Orlando, FL

--

3,048,044

6,128,605

284,082

3,048,044

6,412,687

9,460,732

20,944

1985/1998

10/02

Hairston Crossing

  Decatur, GA

3,655,000

1,066,527

5,563,132

(27,873)

1,066,527

5,535,259

6,601,786

203,964

2001/2002

02/02

Hampton Point

  Taylors, SC

2,475,000

1,072,903

3,453,395

(30,717)

1,072,903

3,422,678

4,495,581

77,761

1993

05/02

Harundale Plaza

  Glen Burnie, MD

--

9,869,539

14,882,463

(752,130)

9,869,539

14,130,333

23,999,872

85,103

1999

11/02

91


Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc.
(a Maryland corporation)

Schedule III

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2002

   

Initial Costs (A)

 

Gross amount at which carried at end of period

   
                     
     

Buildings

Adjustments

 

Buildings

       
     

And

To

 

And

 

Accumulated

Date

Date

Multi-tenant Retail

Encumbrance

Land

Improvements

Basis (C)

Land

Improvements

Total (D)

Depreciation (E)

Constructed

Acquired

                     

Hillsboro Square

  Deerfield Beach, FL

$ 12,100,000

$ 6,157,134

$ 12,828,066

$ 2,044,245

$5,780,000

$ 15,249,445

$ 21,029,445

$ 318,664

1978/2002

06/02

Jones Bridge Plaza

  Norcross, GA

--

1,791,065

5,734,426

(68,599)

1,791,065

5,665,827

7,456,892

36,124

1999

11/02

Lake Olympia Square

  Ocoee, FL

5,478,984

2,567,471

7,306,483

(20,238)

2,562,471

7,291,245

9,853,716

931,453

1995

09/99

Lake Walden Square

  Plant City, FL

9,699,827

3,006,662

11,549,586

222,953

3,006,662

11,772,539

14,779,201

1,748,967

1992

05/99

Lakeview Plaza

  Kissimmee, FL

3,613,237

842,077

5,345,819

(114,665)

842,077

5,231,154

6,073,231

--

1998

12/02

Lakewood Ranch

  Bradenton, FL

4,400,000

3,426,105

6,067,556

(270,692)

3,426,105

5,796,864

9,222,969

37,797

--

11/02

Logger Head Junction

  Sarasota, FL

--

344,321

320,738

(14,646)

344,321

306,092

650,413

11,853

1980/1984

02/02

McFarland Plaza

  Tuscaloosa, AL

8,425,000

2,325,039

12,933,566

(315,354)

2,325,039

12,618,211

14,943,250

260,776

1999

07/02

Meadowmont Village Center

  Chapel Hill, NC

--

2,948,143

23,860,318

(726,370)

2,948,143

23,133,949

26,082,092

--

2002

12/02

Melbourne Shopping Center

  Melbourne, FL

5,947,966

2,382,330

7,459,634

194,642

2,382,330

7,654,276

10,036,606

211,877

1999

04/02

Merchants Square

  Zephyrhills, FL

3,167,437

992,225

4,749,818

40,123

992,225

4,789,941

5,782,166

702,763

1993

06/99

Newnan Pavilion

  Newnan, GA

20,726,371

8,560,550

24,553,440

731,801

8,987,539

24,858,251

33,845,791

677,531

1998/2002

03/02

North Aiken Bi-Lo Center

  Aiken, SC

--

660,000

5,156,040

(109,234)

660,000

5,046,806

5,706,806

33,332

2002

11/02

92


Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc.
(a Maryland corporation)

Schedule III

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2002

   

Initial Costs (A)

 

Gross amount at which carried at end of period

   
                     
     

Buildings

Adjustments

 

Buildings

       
     

And

To

 

And

 

Accumulated

Date

Date

Multi-tenant Retail

Encumbrance

Land

Improvements

Basis (C)

Land

Improvements

Total (D)

Depreciation (E)

Constructed

Acquired

                     

Northpoint Marketplace

  Spartanburg, SC

$ 4,535,000

$ 809,351

$ 7,459,725

$ (390,200)

$ 809,351

$ 7,069,525

$ 7,878,875

$ 166,352

2001

05/02

Oleander Shopping Center

  Wilmington, NC

3,000,000

794,912

4,425,726

(121,373)

794,912

4,304,353

5,099,265

109,492

1989

05/02

Plant City Crossing

  Plant City, FL

--

2,660,804

8,218,061

(336,238)

2,660,804

7,881,823

10,542,627

--

2001

11/02

Pleasant Hill

  Duluth, GA

17,120,000

4,805,830

29,526,305

(284,560)

4,805,830

29,241,745

34,047,575

2,873,743

1997/2000

05/00

Presidential Commons

  Snellville, GA

26,066,555

9,001,185

36,030,481

(718,316)

9,001,185

35,312,165

44,313,350

111,751

2000

11/02

River Ridge

  Birmingham, AL

--

6,487,314

20,004,535

(459,500)

6,487,314

19,545,035

26,032,349

63,797

2001

11/02

Riverstone Plaza

  Canton, GA

17,600,000

5,672,769

26,270,288

(809,212)

5,672,769

25,461,076

31,133,844

692,937

1998

04/02

Rosedale Shopping Center

  Huntersville, NC

13,300,000

2,913,676

16,630,071

(27,949)

2,913,676

16,602,123

19,515,798

--

2000

11/02

Sand Lake Corners

  Orlando, FL

11,900,000

6,091,246

16,164,600

(105,878)

6,091,246

16,058,722

22,149,968

1,119,585

1998/2000

05/01

Sarasota Pavilion

  Sarasota, FL

29,850,000

17,273,845

24,826,101

(297,297)

17,273,845

24,528,804

41,802,649

820,140

1999

01/02

Sexton Commons

  Fuquay Varina, NC

4,400,000

799,852

7,223,004

(125,873)

799,852

7,097,131

7,896,983

132,864

2001/2002

08/02

Sharon Greens

  Cumming, GA

6,500,000

3,593,247

9,468,907

(262,809)

3,593,247

9,206,098

12,799,345

234,402

2001

05/02

Shoppes at Citiside

  Charlotte, NC

--

2,009,614

7,696,077

(115,877)

2,009,614

7,580,199

9,589,814

--

2002

12/02

93


Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc.
(a Maryland corporation)

Schedule III

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2002

   

Initial Costs (A)

 

Gross amount at which carried at end of period

   
                     
     

Buildings

Adjustments

 

Buildings

       
     

And

To

 

And

 

Accumulated

Date

Date

Multi-tenant Retail

Encumbrance

Land

Improvements

Basis (C)

Land

Improvements

Total (D)

Depreciation (E)

Constructed

Acquired

                     

Shoppes at Lake Mary

  Lake Mary, FL

$ 6,250,000

$ 3,618,581

$ 7,521,439

$ (83,168)

$3,618,581

$ 7,438,271

$ 11,056,851

$ 99,040

2001

08/02

Shoppes at New Tampa

  Wesley Chapel, FL

--

6,007,635

13,187,920

724,451

6,007,635

13,912,370

19,920,006

--

2002

12/02

Shoppes of Golden Acres

  Newport Richey, FL

--

3,900,000

6,930,734

388,231

3,900,000

7,318,965

11,218,965

74,884

2002

02/02

Shoppes on the Circle

  Dothan, AL

12,200,088

1,544,088

13,468,413

15,313

1,544,088

13,483,726

15,027,814

88,308

2000

11/02

Skyview Plaza

  Orlando, FL

10,875,000

7,460,820

13,871,448

586,794

7,460,820

14,458,242

21,919,062

708,290

1994/1998

09/01

Southlake Pavilion

  Morrow, GA

34,602,709

7,830,719

48,545,944

2,759,304

8,402,373

50,733,593

59,135,966

1,651,294

1996/2001

12/01

Southlake Shopping Center

  Cornelius, NC

7,683,755

3,633,377

9,999,573

(97,016)

3,633,377

9,902,557

13,535,933

35,386

2001

11/02

Steeplechase Plaza

  Ocala, FL

4,651,350

1,554,810

7,092,510

359,348

1,618,271

7,388,398

9,006,668

282,427

1993

12/01

Stonebridge Square

  Roswell, GA

10,900,000

4,582,728

14,946,585

104,551

4,865,527

14,768,337

19,633,864

338,061

2001/2002

06/02

Sycamore Commons

  Matthews, NC

20,000,000

7,995,359

30,188,891

(505,039)

7,995,359

29,683,852

37,679,212

565,687

2001/2002

07/02

Target Center

  Columbia, SC

4,192,000

1,994,642

5,677,919

(99,602)

1,994,642

5,578,317

7,572,959

179,133

2002

04/02

Town Center Commons

  Kennesaw, GA

4,750,000

3,293,792

6,350,835

(31,262)

3,293,792

6,319,573

9,613,365

863,839

1998

07/99

Turkey Creek Phase I

  Knoxville, TN

13,220,000

3,973,419

17,788,597

131,707

4,054,200

17,839,523

21,893,723

738,519

2001

01/02

94


Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc.
(a Maryland corporation)

Schedule III

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2002

   

Initial Costs (A)

 

Gross amount at which carried at end of period

   
                     
     

Buildings

Adjustments

 

Buildings

       
     

And

To

 

And

 

Accumulated

Date

Date

Multi-tenant Retail

Encumbrance

Land

Improvements

Basis (C)

Land

Improvements

Total (D)

Depreciation (E)

Constructed

Acquired

                     

Universal Plaza

  Lauderhill, FL

$ 4,970,000

$ 3,571,566

$ 6,300,870

$ (620,803)

$3,571,566

$ 5,680,067

$ 9,251,633

$ 230,150

2002

01/02

Venture Pointe

  Duluth, GA

15,790,000

10,878,572

15,654,530

185,203

10,878,571

15,839,734

26,718,305

548,592

1996

12/01

Village Square at Golf

  Boynton Beach, FL

--

4,536,806

14,000,584

(70,783)

4,536,806

13,929,801

18,466,607

45,432

1983/2002

11/02

Wakefield Crossing

  Raleigh, NC

5,920,000

2,151,750

8,642,715

(190,542)

2,151,750

8,452,173

10,603,923

169,935

2001

08/02

Walk at Highwoods I

  Tampa, FL

13,230,000

7,423,113

16,575,476

(698,077)

7,423,113

15,877,399

23,300,511

327,970

2001

07/02

Ward's Crossing

  Lynchburg, VA

6,090,000

2,661,733

8,438,070

(208,031)

2,661,733

8,230,039

10,891,772

237,335

2001

06/02

West Oaks

  Ocoee, FL

4,900,000

4,514,559

6,706,310

27,585

4,514,559

6,733,895

11,248,455

463,995

2000

03/01

Woodstock Square

  Atlanta, GA

14,000,000

5,516,733

22,079,359

(51,107)

5,516,733

22,028,252

27,544,985

1,265,140

2001

06/01

95


Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc.
(a Maryland corporation)

Schedule III

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2002

   

Initial Costs (A)

 

Gross amount at which carried at end of period

   
                     
     

Buildings

Adjustments

 

Buildings

       

And

To

And

Accumulated

Date

Date

Single-User Retail

Encumbrance

Land

Improvements

Basis (C)

Land

Improvements

Total (D)

Depreciation (E)

Constructed

Acquired

Bass Pro Outdoor World

  Dania Beach, FL

$ 9,100,000

$ 6,938,145

$ 11,281,774

$ (187,305)

$6,938,145

$ 11,094,469

$ 18,032,614

$ 199,600

1999

06/02

Circuit City-Cary

  Cary, NC

--

1,876,188

3,773,564

(33,065)

1,876,188

3,740,499

5,616,687

35,699

2000

09/02

Circuit City-Rome

  Rome, GA

2,470,000

662,211

3,813,902

(39,890)

662,211

3,774,012

4,436,224

66,482

2001

06/02

Circuit City-Vero Beach

  Vero Beach, FL

3,120,000

1,985,167

3,663,277

(37,084)

1,985,167

3,626,193

5,611,360

65,845

2001

06/02

Eckerd Drug Store -  Blackstock

  Spartanburg, SC

--

850,144

1,872,737

(21,725)

850,144

1,851,012

2,701,155

35,312

2002

08/02

Eckerd Drug Store - Concord

  Concord, NC

--

725,000

1,313,566

175,659

725,000

1,489,225

2,214,225

9,050

2002

04/02

Eckerd Drug Store -  Greenville

  Greenville, SC

1,540,400

1,470,306

1,357,205

(34,819)

1,470,306

1,322,386

2,792,692

57,818

2001

11/01

Eckerd Drug Store -  Spartanburg

  Spartanburg, SC

1,541,600

757,850

2,049,000

(8,612)

757,850

2,040,388

2,798,238

102,591

2001

12/01

Eckerd Drug Store - Tega Cay

  Tega Cay, SC

--

1,156,000

1,388,212

392,023

1,156,000

1,780,235

2,936,235

9,631

2002

04/02

Eckerd Drug Store - Woodruff

  Woodruff, SC

--

950,000

1,525,208

379,490

950,000

1,904,698

2,854,698

5,320

2002

07/02

Jo-Ann Fabrics

  Alpharetta, GA

2,450,000

2,217,303

2,693,824

--

2,217,303

2,693,824

4,911,126

143,347

2000

06/01

Just for Feet - Augusta

  Augusta, GA

1,668,000

697,307

2,357,037

(26,283)

697,307

2,330,754

3,028,060

80,664

1999

02/02

96


Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc.
(a Maryland corporation)

Schedule III

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2002

   

Initial Costs (A)

 

Gross amount at which carried at end of period

   
                     
     

Buildings

Adjustments

 

Buildings

       
     

And

To

 

And

 

Accumulated

Date

Date

Single-User Retail

Encumbrance

Land

Improvements

Basis (C)

Land

Improvements

Total (D)

Depreciation (E)

Constructed

Acquired

Just For Feet - Covington

  Covington, LA

$ 1,885,000

$ 1,218,745

$ 2,228,638

$ (31,180)

$1,218,745

$ 2,197,458

$ 3,416,204

$ 75,911

1999

02/02

Just for Feet - Daytona

  Daytona Beach, FL

2,000,000

1,651,300

2,249,996

(24,737)

1,651,300

2,225,259

3,876,559

108,955

1998

08/01

K-Mart

  Macon, GA

4,655,000

1,172,127

7,858,709

--

1,172,127

7,858,709

9,030,835

616,603

2000

02/01

Lowe's Home

  Improvement Center

  Warner Robbins, GA

4,845,000

2,430,841

7,000,513

--

2,430,841

7,000,513

9,431,354

560,250

2000

02/01

PETsMART - Chattanooga

  Chattanooga, TN

1,303,800

775,738

2,327,215

--

775,738

2,327,215

3,102,953

129,289

1995

04/01

PETsMART - Daytona Beach

  Daytona Beach, FL

1,361,200

809,449

2,428,348

--

809,449

2,428,348

3,237,798

134,908

1996

04/01

PETsMART - Fredericksburg

  Fredericksburg, VA

1,435,000

852,498

2,557,493

--

852,498

2,557,493

3,409,991

142,082

1997

04/01

Rainbow Foods - Garland

  Garland, TX

--

1,248,572

3,849,672

(98,796)

1,248,578

3,750,865

4,999,444

--

1994

11/02

Rainbow Foods -Rowlett

  Rowlett, TX

--

1,128,295

3,475,459

(91,520)

1,128,295

3,383,940

4,512,235

22,114

1995/2001

11/02

97


Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc.
(a Maryland corporation)

Schedule III

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2002

   

Initial Costs (A)

 

Gross amount at which carried at end of period

   
                     
     

Buildings

Adjustments

 

Buildings

       
     

And

To

 

And

 

Accumulated

Date

Date

Development Projects

Encumbrance

Land

Improvements

Basis (C)

Land

Improvements

Total (D)

Depreciation (E)

Constructed

Acquired

Citrus Hills - Blockbuster

  Citrus Hills, FL

$ --

$ --

$ 171,516

$ --

$ --

$ 171,516

$ 171,516

$ --

--

12/01

Eckerd Drug Store - Gaffney

  Gaffney, SC

--

1,038,630

134,480

--

1,038,630

134,481

1,173,111

--

--

12/02

Eckerd Drug Store -

  Perry Creek

  Raleigh, NC

--

918,925

855,790

--

918,925

855,790

1,774,715

--

--

09/02

Shoppes at Chalet Suzanne

  Lake Wales, FL

--

3,101,850

168,054

--

3,101,850

168,054

3,269,904

--

--

12/02

Southampton Village

  Tyrone, GA

--

2,183,059

579,256

--

2,183,059

579,256

2,762,315

--

--

11/02

Southwood Plantation

  Tallahassee, FL

--

847,540

1,089,395

--

847,540

1,089,395

1,936,935

--

--

10/02

Total:

675,621,971

371,298,471

1,131,885,532

(3,502,906)

371,857,648

1,127,823,448

1,499,681,097

40,737,139

==========

=========

==========

===========

=========

==========

===========

============

98


INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(a Maryland corporation)

Schedule III (continued)
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2002

 

Notes:

  1. The initial cost to the Company represents the original purchase price of the property, including amounts incurred subsequent to acquisition which were contemplated at the time the property was acquired.
  2. The aggregate cost of real estate owned at December 31, 2002 for Federal income tax purposes was approximately $1,518,758,000 (unaudited).
  3. Adjustments to basis include additions to investment properties net of payments received under master lease agreements. As part of several purchases, the Company will receive rent in accordance with master lease agreements pertaining to non-revenue producing spaces for periods ranging from one to two years or until the spaces are leased. GAAP requires that as these payments are received, they be recorded as a reduction in the purchase price of the properties rather than as rental income.
  4. Reconciliation of real estate owned:
  5.    

          2002     

     

          2001     

             

    Balance at beginning of year

    $

    595,738,856

    $

    191,862,088 

    Purchases of property

     

    909,909,220

     

    403,093,755 

    Additions

     

    11,994,653

     

    2,458,996 

    Payments received under master   leases and principal escrow

     

    (1,780,102)

     

         (1,675,983)

    Acquired in-place lease origination costs

     

    (14,550,506)

     

    --

    Acquired above market lease costs

     

    (12,325,336)

     

    --

    Acquired below below market lease costs

     

    10,694,311

     

    --

             

    Balance at end of year

    $

    1,499,681,096

    $

    595,738,856 

       

    ============

     

    ===========

  6. Reconciliation of accumulated depreciation:

Balance at beginning of year

$

14,135,094

$

5,811,071

Depreciation expense

 

26,602,045

 

8,324,023

         

Balance at end of year

$

40,737,139

$

14,135,094

   

===========

 

==========

 99


Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

There were no disagreements with the Company's accountants or other reportable events during 2002.

 

 

 

PART III

 

Item 10.  Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

Officers and Directors

Our current officers and directors and their positions are as follows:

Robert D. Parks

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Affiliated Director

Barry L. Lazarus

President, Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Affiliated Director

Daniel K. Deighan

Independent Director

Michael S. Rosenthal

Independent Director

Kenneth E. Masick

Independent Director

Roberta S. Matlin

Vice President - Administration

Steven D. Sanders

Vice President - Acquisitions

Scott W. Wilton

Secretary

The Inland Group, Inc. or Inland, together with its subsidiaries and its and their affiliates (collectively, the "Inland Affiliated Companies" or the "Inland Organization"), is a fully integrated real estate company providing property management, leasing, marketing, acquisition, disposition, development, redevelopment, syndication, renovation, construction, finance and other related services. Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation or IREIC, a subsidiary of Inland, and one of the Inland Affiliated Companies, is the sponsor and organizer of the Company. Inland Retail Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc., or the Advisor, is a wholly owned subsidiary of IREIC. Inland Securities Corporation or ISC, another of the Inland Affiliated Companies, is the Dealer Manager of our offerings. ISC was formed in 1984 and is qualified to do business as a securities broker-dealer throughout the United States. Since its formation, ISC has provided the marketing function for distribution of the investment products sponsored by IREIC. ISC does not render such services to anyone other than the Inland Affiliated Companies. Our senior management includes executives of the Inland Affiliated Companies named above.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100


 

 

  ROBERT D. PARKS (age 59) has been with The Inland Group Inc. ("Inland") and its affiliates since 1968 and is one of the four original principals. He has been our chairman, chief executive officer, and an affiliated director since our formation in 1998. He is a director of The Inland Group as well as chairman of our sponsor. Mr. Parks is president, chief executive officer, and a director of Inland Real Estate Corporation. He is still a director of Inland Real Estate Corporation. He is a director of Inland Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc., Inland Investment Advisors, Inc., Partnership Ownership Corp., Inland Southern Acquisitions, Inc. and Inland Southeast Investment Corp. He is a director of our Advisor, a director of Inland Securities Corporation ("Inland Securities"), and a Trustee of Inland Mutual Fund Trust.

Mr. Parks is responsible for the ongoing administration of existing investment programs, corporate budgeting and administration for our sponsor. He oversees and coordinates the marketing of all investments and investor relations.

Prior to joining Inland, Mr. Parks was a school teacher in Chicago's public schools. He received his B.A. Degree from Northeastern Illinois University and his M.A. Degree from the University of Chicago. He is a registered Direct Participation Program Limited Principal with the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. He is also a member of the Real Estate Investment Association, the Financial Planning Association, the Foundation for Financial Planning, as well as a member of the National Association of Real Estate Investments Trusts, Inc.

  BARRY L. LAZARUS (age 55) has been president, chief operating officer and an affiliated director of the Company since its formation in 1998, and has been Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company since June 1999. After a brief career in public accounting, Mr. Lazarus joined Inland in 1973 as its original controller and was later promoted to Treasurer. From 1973 to 1979 he supervised all corporate and partnership accounting and tax matters, and managed corporate financial affairs. In 1979 Mr. Lazarus relocated to Phoenix, Arizona and formed The Butterfield Company, a development and contracting firm, while also serving as a consultant to investors in several commercial ventures. Between 1979 and 1987 the Butterfield Company successfully completed several projects in conjunction with national real estate firms, including Inland. From 1988 until October 1990 Mr. Lazarus was Vice President of Finance for UDC Homes, Inc., then a New York Stock Exchange Company and the largest homebuilder in the state of Arizona. His duties included obtaining financing for numerous development and construction projects in the Southeastern and Southwestern United States, as well as maintaining investor relations.

  Mr. Lazarus rejoined Inland in October 1990 and became President of Intervest Midwest Real Estate Corporation ("Intervest"), then an affiliate of the Inland Group. He solely owns Wisconsin and Southern Land Company, Inc., of which he has been President and Director since December 1993. Wisconsin and Southern Land Company, Inc., which has its office in Orlando, Florida, is a holding company that acquired Intervest from The Inland Group in 1994. Intervest, pursuant to a service agreement, previously provided property zoning, development and disposition services to Wisconsin Capital Land Fund, L.P. ("Wisconsin Land Fund"), a private placement real estate equity program sponsored by our Sponsor. Mr. Lazarus is president of Inland Shelter Group, LLC, Orlando, Florida, which was engaged in the development of apartment buildings in the state of Georgia through 1998. He received his B.B.A. Degree from the University of Wisconsin, is a certified public accountant and holds real estate broker licenses in the states of Florida and Georgia.

  DANIEL K. DEIGHAN (age 62) has been an Independent Director of the Company since September 1998. He is an appraiser, who holds the MAI designation from the American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers (the predecessor to the Appraisal Institute), and has over 25 years of appraisal experience. He has testified as an expert witness in numerous counties throughout Florida, and in some courts in New York in eminent domain and other appraisal matters. Mr. Deighan is President of Florida Property Consultants Group, which has its office in Port St. Lucie, Florida. That firm is successor to Deighan Appraisal Associates, Inc. and its predecessors, which Mr. Deighan formed in 1971. Its business is the providing of expert appraisal, consulting and eminent domain services throughout Florida. Since February 1996, he has been Vice-President of Southern Property Consultants, Inc., a firm which specializes in real estate tax appeals.

Deighan Appraisal Associates, Inc. was honored as the "Business of the Year" in 1990 by the Port St. Lucie Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Deighan is past Vice Chairman of the Martin County Industrial Development Agency and a past President of the Tri-County Tec Foundation and the Economic Council of Martin County, Florida. He received his B.A. Degree from Sienna College, Albany, New York.

101


  MICHAEL S. ROSENTHAL (age 45) has been an Independent Director of the Company since October 1998. He is an attorney who has been in private practice since 1984. He has been a shareholder of the Atlanta, Georgia law firm of Wagner, Johnston & Rosenthal, P.C. since September 1996. From January 1991 through August 1996, Mr. Rosenthal was President and a shareholder of the Atlanta, Georgia law firm of Weinstein, Rosenthal & Tobin, P.C. That law firm's predecessor conducted business as a partnership under the name of Weinstein, Rosenthal & Tobin from 1986 through December 1990, and Mr. Rosenthal served as its managing partner. He represents primarily service industry clients, providing day-to-day business counseling and advice, and services in the areas of mergers and acquisitions, real estate acquisitions and financings, as well as litigation when necessary. Mr. Rosenthal received both his B.A. Degree and his law degree from the University of Florida.

  KENNETH E. MASICK (age 56) has been an Independent Director of the Company since December 1998. He has been a partner of Wolf & Company LLP, certified public accountants, since its formation in 1978. That firm, one of the largest in the Chicagoland area, specializes in audit, tax and consulting services to privately owned businesses. Mr. Masick currently is partner-in-charge of the firm's audit and accounting department and is responsible for the firm's quality control. His accounting experience also includes forecasts and projections, feasibility studies and due diligence activities on acquisitions. Mr. Masick has been in public accounting since his graduation from Southern Illinois University in 1967. He is also licensed as a General Securities Representative. Mr. Masick is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Illinois CPA Society. He also serves as treasurer and director of Oak Brook Financial Group, Inc., a securities broker dealer firm. All of the mentioned entities with which Mr. Masick is affiliated have their offices in Oak Brook, Illinois.

  ROBERTA S. MATLIN (age 58) has been Vice President--Administration of the Company since its formation in 1998. Ms. Matlin joined Inland in 1984 as Director of Investor Administration and currently serves as Senior Vice President--Investments of IREIC, directing IREIC's day-to-day internal operations. She has also been Vice President-Administration of IREC from March 1995 to July 2000. Ms. Matlin is a Director of IREIC, ISC and Inland Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc. the Advisor to IREC. She is President and Director of Inland Investment Advisors, Inc. and Intervest Southern Real Estate Corporation and a trustee of Inland Mutual Fund Trust. Until December 31, 2001, she was a Director of Inland Apartment Acquisitions, Inc. Prior to joining Inland, she spent 11 years with the Chicago Region of the Social Security Administration of the United States Department of Health and Human Services. Ms. Matlin received her B.A. Degree from the University of Illinois. She is registered with the NASD as a general securities principal and investment advisor.

  STEVEN D. SANDERS (age 52) has been our Vice President of Acquisitions since our formation. Mr. Sanders has been an officer of Inland Acquisitions, one of our Affiliates since 1993 and its Senior Vice President since 1997. He was President of our Property Manager between May of 1998 and March of 2000. He has been involved in the real estate industry, continuously since 1970. His real estate career began with Carlsberg Financial Corporation in Los Angeles, California, a sponsor of national real estate limited partnerships that acquired office, industrial, multi-family, Manufactured home parks and retail properties throughout the United States. As Regional Director of Acquisitions, Mr. Sanders' responsibilities included identification, analysis, negotiations and closings of properties in the eastern United States, on behalf of Carlsberg Financial Corporation sponsored partnerships. In 1979 and 1980, Mr. Sanders worked for R&B Development, Los Angeles, California, as Director of Acquisitions for multi-family properties acquired for ultimate conversions to condominiums. In 1981, he formed Irvine Properties, Inc. which offered real estate consultation, brokerage and management services to local and national investors. In 1984, Mr. Sanders joined Univest Real Estate Corporation, Tampa, Florida, an affiliate of Inland, and spearheaded the acquisition of multi-family properties throughout the state of Florida. In 1988, he formed Florida Country Clubs, Inc., which acquired and operated three golf and country clubs located in Orlando, Florida. In 1991, Mr. Sanders acquired interests in additional golf and country clubs on the east and west coasts of Florida. In 1993 he rejoined Inland at its Oak Brook, Illinois headquarters with the primary responsibility of acquiring shopping centers for IREC.

 102


 

 

  SCOTT W. WILTON (age 42) has been our secretary since August 2000. Mr. Wilton joined The Inland Group in January 1995. He is assistant vice president of The Inland Real Estate Group, Inc. and assistant counsel with The Inland Real Estate Group law department. Mr. Wilton is involved in all aspects of our business, including real estate acquisitions and financing, securities law and corporate governance matters, leasing and tenant matters, and litigation management. He received B.S. degrees in economics and history from the University of Illinois at Champaign in 1982 and his law degree from Loyola University of Chicago, Illinois in 1985. Prior to joining The Inland Group, Mr. Wilton worked for the Chicago law firm of Williams, Rutstein, Goldfarb, Sibrava and Midura, Ltd., specializing in real estate and corporate transactions and litigation.

The election of members of the Board of Directors is conducted on an annual basis. Each individual elected to the Board serves a one-year term or until his or her successor is elected and qualified. Accordingly, the term of office of each director of the Company will expire at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held later this year. It is anticipated that at such meeting each current director will be nominated to stand for reelection as a director to hold office until the Company's annual meeting of stockholders to hold in 2001 and until his successor is elected and qualified. The Company has no reason to believe that any of the anticipated nominees will be unable of unwilling to serve if elected.

 

Item 11.  Executive Compensation

With the exception of Barry L. Lazarus, the Company's executive officers are all employees of Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation, the owner of Inland Retail Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc., the Company's Advisor, and/or its affiliates. The Company does not pay any of these individuals for serving in their respective positions. For a discussion of fees paid to the Advisor and other Inland Affiliated Companies, see "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" below.

Mr. Lazarus was paid $175,000 and $100,000 in 2002 and 2001 respectively, and reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses for his services as President, Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company. His "at will" employment is based on an oral agreement. Mr. Lazarus will devote substantially all of his time to the Company's business.

The Company pays its Independent Directors an annual fee of $5,000. Messrs. Deighan, Rosenthal and Masick were paid fees of $14,250 and $10,500 each in 2002 and 2001, respectively, $6,200, $5,700, and $6,200, respectively in 2000 for their services as Independent Directors. In addition, each Independent Director receives $500 for attending in person or $250 for attending by telephone each meeting of the Board of Directors or a committee thereof. Officers of the Company who are Directors (Messrs. Parks and Lazarus) are not paid fees for serving as directors.

Under the Company's Independent Director Stock Option Plan, each Independent Director is entitled to be granted an option to acquire 3,000 shares as of the date they become a Director and an additional 500 shares on the date of each annual stockholders' meeting commencing with the annual meeting in 2000 so long as the Independent Director remains a member of the Board on such date. The options for the initial 3,000 Shares will be exercisable as follows: 1,000 Shares on the date of grant and 1,000 Shares on each of the first and second anniversaries of the date of grant. The options to be granted as of each annual stockholders meeting will become fully exercisable on the second anniversary of the date of grant. Options granted will be exercisable at $9.05 per share. As of December 31, 2002, options to acquire 13,500 Shares had been issued.

 

 

103


Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table sets forth information as of March 18, 2003 regarding the number and percentage of shares beneficially owned by: (i) each director; (ii) each executive officer; (iii) all directors and executive officers as a group; and (iv) as of March 18, 2003, any person known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the shares.

 

Number of Shares Beneficially

Percent

Name of Beneficial Owner

Owned (1)

of Class

     

Robert D. Parks

68,193 (2)

*  

Barry L. Lazarus

11,050

*  

Daniel K. Deighan

5,292 (3)

*  

Michael S. Rosenthal

7,650 (3)

*  

Kenneth E. Masick

6,874 (3)

*  

Roberta S. Matlin

343      

-  

Steven D. Sanders

-       

-  

Scott W. Wilton

-       

-  

All Directors and Executive Officers as a group
(8 persons)

99,402 (2)

*  

* Less than 1%

  1. Beneficial ownership includes outstanding shares and shares that any person has the right to acquire within 60 days after the date of this table. Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table and pursuant to applicable community property laws, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all Shares beneficially owned by them.
  2. Includes 20,000 shares owned by the Advisor. The Advisor is a wholly owned subsidiary of IREIC, which is an affiliate of Inland. Mr. Parks is a control person of Inland and disclaims beneficial ownership of shares owned by the Advisor.
  3. Includes shares issuable upon exercise of options to which each independent director is entitled but which have not yet been issued, which options are currently exercisable or are exercisable within 60 days after the date of this table.

 

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

For the year ended December 31, 2002, we incurred a total of $125,224,459 of organizational and offering costs, of which $111,594,678 was paid or accrued to affiliates.

As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, we had incurred $125,224,459 and $39,335,560, respectively, of offering costs, of which $111,594,678 and $30,981,962 was paid to affiliates. Pursuant to the terms of the offerings, the Advisor has guaranteed payment of all public offering expenses (excluding sales commissions and the marketing contribution and the due diligence expense allowance) in excess of 5.5% of the gross proceeds of the offerings or gross offering proceeds or all organization and offering expenses (including selling commissions) which together exceed 15% of gross offering proceeds. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, offering costs did not exceed the 5.5% and 15% limitations. We anticipate that these costs will not exceed these limitations upon completion of the second follow-on offering. Any excess amounts at the completion of the second follow-on offering will be reimbursed by the Advisor.

104


The Advisor and its affiliates are entitled to reimbursement for salaries and expenses of employees of the Advisor and its affiliates relating to the offerings. In addition, an affiliate of the Advisor is entitled to receive selling commissions, and the marketing contribution and due diligence expense allowance from us in connection with the offerings. Such costs are offset against the stockholders' equity accounts. Such costs totaled $ 79,614,867, $19,287,730, and $6,907,685 for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, of which $1,309,885 and $773,191 was unpaid at December 31, 2002, and 2001.

The Advisor and its affiliates are entitled to reimbursement for general and administrative of the Advisor and its affiliates relating to our administration. Such costs are included in general and administrative expenses to affiliates, professional services to affiliates, and acquisition cost expenses to affiliates, in addition to costs that were capitalized pertaining to property acquisitions. During the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 we incurred $1,702,748, $538,306, and $257,840 of these costs, of which $515,204 and $332,831 remained unpaid as of December 31, 2002 and 2001.

An affiliate of the Advisor provides loan servicing to us for an annual fee. Such costs are incurred in property operating expenses to affiliates. The agreement allows for annual fees totaling .05% of the first $100,000,000 in mortgage balance outstanding and .03% of the remaining mortgage balance, payable monthly. Such fees totaled $145,085, $59,469 and $48,322 in the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000.

The Advisor has contributed $200,000 to our capital for which it received 20,000 Shares.

We used the services of an affiliate of the Advisor to facilitate the mortgage financing that we obtained on some of the properties purchased. Such costs are capitalized as loan fees and amortized over the respective loan term. During the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 we paid loan fees totaling $477,274, $177,436 and $23,438 to this affiliate.

We are obligated to pay an advisor asset management fee of not more than 1% of our net asset value. Our net asset value is defined as the total book value of our assets invested in equity interests and loans receivable secured by real estate, before reserves for depreciation, reserves for bad debt or other similar non-cash reserves, reduced by any mortgages payable on the respective assets. We compute our net asset value by taking the average of these values at the end of each month for which we calculate the fee. The fee is payable quarterly in an amount equal to 1/4 of 1% of net asset value as of the last day of the immediately preceding quarter. For any year in which we qualify as a REIT, our advisor must reimburse us for the following amounts if any: (1) the amounts by which our total operating expenses, the sum of the advisor asset management fee plus other operating expenses, paid during the previous fiscal year exceed the greater of: (i) 2% of our average invested assets for that fiscal year. (Average invested assets is the average of the total book value of our assets invested in equity interest and loans secured by real estate, before depreciation, reserve for bad debt or other similar non-cash reserves. We will compute the average invested assets by taking the average of these values at the end of each month for which we are calculating the fee), or (ii) 25% of our net income, before any additions to or allowances for reserves, depreciation, amortization, bad debts or other similar non-cash reserves and before any gain from the sale of our assets, for that fiscal year; plus (2) an amount, which will not exceed the advisor asset management fee for that year, equal to any difference between the total amount of distributions to stockholders for that year and a 7% minimum annual return on the net investment of stockholders. For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 we incurred $5,293,000, none, and $120,000 of asset management fees, of which $2,000,000 was unpaid at December 31, 2002. We neither paid nor accrued such fees, for the year ended December 31, 2001 because the Advisor indicated that it would forego such fees.

The property managers, entities owned principally by individuals who are affiliates of the Advisor, are entitled to receive property management fees totaling 4.5% of gross operating income, for management and leasing services. We incurred and paid property management fees of $4,870,084, $1,605,492 and $926,978 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. None remained unpaid as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

In December 2001 and January 2002, an affiliate of the Advisor guaranteed the mortgages payable pertaining to Douglasville Pavilion, Southlake Pavilion, Fayetteville Pavilion, and Sarasota Pavilion, all of which matured in July 2002. We agreed to pay the affiliate 1/8% per annum of the guaranteed amount for providing such a guarantee. As of December 31, 2002, $56,639 of guarantee fees related to the LLC's had been incurred, of which none remained unpaid at December 31, 2002. All of the respective mortgages payable were paid off in June 2002.

105


Item 14: Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company (its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively) have concluded, based on their evaluation as of a date within 90 days prior to the date of the filing of this Report, that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports filed or submitted by it under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There were no significant changes in the Company's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of such evaluation.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company, as part of its routine business operations, continuously reviews its policies, and procedures and systems applications in order to identify areas for process improvements. It has been the Company's experience that upon implementation, these improvements provide enhancements to the current state of the Company's internal controls.

106


PART IV

 

Item 15.  Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K

(a)  List of documents filed:

  1. The consolidated financial statements of the Company included in this report are set forth in Item 8.
  2. Financial Statement Schedules:
  3. The following financial statement schedule for the year ended December 31, 2002 is submitted herewith:

    Page

       

    Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Schedule III)

    89

    Schedules not filed:

    All schedules other than the one listed above have been omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.

  4. Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed as part of this document:

Item No.

Description

   

3.1

Third Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Charter of Inland Retail Real Estate Trust,   Inc. (Included as Exhibit 3.1 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed on May 1, 2001 (File No. 333-50822) and incorporated herein by reference.)

   

3.2

Amended and Restated Bylaws of Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. (Included as Exhibit 3.2 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed on May 1, 2001 (File No. 333-50822) and incorporated herein by reference.)

   

3.2 (a)

Amendment to Amended and Restated Bylaws of Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. dated February 22, 2002.

4.1

Agreement of Limited Partnership of Inland Retail Real Estate Limited Partnership. (Included as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed November 28, 2000 (File No. 333-50822) and incorporated herein by reference.)

   

4.1(a)

First Amendment to Agreement of Limited Partnership of Inland Retail Real Estate Limited Partnership. (Included as Exhibit 4.1(a) to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed November 28, 2000 (File No. 333-50822) and incorporated herein by reference.)

   

4.2

Specimen Certificate for the Shares. (Included as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed September 28, 1998 (File No. 333-64391) and incorporated herein by reference.)

   

10.1

Escrow Agreement by and among Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc., Inland Securities Corporation and LaSalle National Bank, N.A. (Included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed on January 31, 2001 (File No. 333-50822) and incorporated herein by reference.)

   

10.2

First Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement by and between Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. and Inland Retail Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc. (Included as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed November 28, 2000 (File No. 333-50822) and incorporated herein by reference.)

 107


Item No.

Description

   

10.2 (a)

First amendment to first Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement. (Included as Exhibit 10.2(a) Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Company's Registration Statement filed on August 1, 2001 (File No. 333-50822) and incorporated herein by reference.)

   

10.3

Master Management Agreement, including the form of Management Agreement for each   Property by and between Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. and Inland Southeast Property   Management Corp. (Included as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed November 28, 2000 (File No. 333-50822) and incorporated herein by   reference.)

10.3(a)

First Amendment to Master Management Agreement. (Included as Exhibit 10.3(a) to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed November 28, 2000 (File No. 333-  50822) and incorporated herein by reference.)

   

10.4

First Amended and Restated Property Acquisition Service Agreement by and among Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc., Inland Retail Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc., Inland Real Estate Corporation, Inland Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc., and Inland Real Estate Acquisitions, Inc. (Included as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Registration Statement on   Form S-11 filed November 28, 2000 (File No. 333-50822) and incorporated herein by reference.)

   

10.5

Independent Director Stock Option Plan (included as Exhibit 10.5 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed January 7, 1999 (File No. 333-64391) and incorporated herein by reference).

   

10.5(a)

Form of Option Agreement for initial grant of options (included as an Exhibit to Amendment   No. 4 to the Company's Registration Statement filed on May 3, 2000 (File No. 333-64391) and incorporated herein by reference).

   

10.5(b)

Form of Option Agreement for subsequent grant of options (included as Exhibit 10.5(b) to Amendment No. 6 to the Company's Registration Statement filed on August 2, 2000 (File No. 333-64391) and incorporated herein by reference).

   

10.6

Form of Indemnification Agreement by and between Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. and its Directors and executive officers (included as Exhibit 10.6 to Amendment No. 3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed February 9, 1999 (File No. 333-64391) and incorporated herein by reference).

   
   

10.7

Agreement dated March, 1999 between Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. and Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation relating to payment of the reasonably estimated cost to prepare and mail a notice to stockholders of any special meeting of stockholders requested   by the stockholders. (Included as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed November 28, 2000 (File No. 333-50822) and incorporated herein by reference.)

   

21

Subsidiaries of the Registrant (Included as Exhibit 21 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed on January 31, 2001 (File No. 333-50822) and incorporated herein by reference.).

(b)  Reports on Form 8-K:

    None

(c)  See exhibit index included above.

(d)  None

108


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.

 
   
 

/s/ Robert D. Parks

   
   

By:

Robert D. Parks

 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Affiliated Director

Date:

March 27, 2003

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

 

 

/s/ Robert D. Parks

   
   

By:

Robert D. Parks

 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Affiliated Director

Date:

March 27, 2003

   
 

/s/ Barry L. Lazarus

   
   

By:

Barry L. Lazarus

 

President, Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer (Chief Accounting Officer), Chief Financial Officer   and Affiliated Director

Date:

March 27, 2003

   
 

/s/ Daniel K. Deighan

   
   

By:

Daniel K. Deighan

 

Independent Director

Date:

March 27, 2003

   
 

/s/ Kenneth E. Masick

   
   

By:

Kenneth E. Masick

 

Independent Director

Date:

March 27, 2003

   
 

/s/ Michael S. Rosenthal

   

By:

Michael S. Rosenthal

 

Independent Director

Date:

March 27, 2003

109


Section 302

certification

I, Robert D. Parks, certify that:

  1. have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc.;
  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.
  4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
  1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
  2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
  3. presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
  1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
  1. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
  2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
  1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: March 27, 2003

  • /S/ Robert D. Parks                          

  • Robert D. Parks

  • Chief Executive Office

  •  

    110


     

    Section 302

    certification

    I, Barry L. Lazarus, certify that:

    1. have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc.;
    2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
    3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.
    4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
    1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
    2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
    3. presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
    1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
    1. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
    2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
    1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


    Date: March 27, 2003

  • /S/ Barry L. Lazarus

  • Barry L. Lazarus

  • Chief Financial Officer

  • 111

  •