424B3 1 supp5.htm Supplement 5

Filed pursuant to 424(b)(3)

Registration #333-50822

SUPPLEMENT NO. 5
DATED JUNE 14, 2001
TO THE PROSPECTUS DATED FEBRUARY 1, 2001
OF INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.

We are providing this Supplement No. 5 to you in order to supplement our Prospectus. This Supplement updates information in the "Real Property Investments" and "Plan of Distribution" sections of our Prospectus. This Supplement No. 5 supplements, modifies or supersedes certain information contained in our Prospectus, Supplement No. 3 dated May 1, 2001 and Supplement No. 4 dated May 21, 2001 and must be read in conjunction with our Prospectus and those Supplements. Any word that is capitalized in this Supplement but not defined has the same meaning as in our Prospectus.

 

Real Property Investments

Jo-Ann Fabrics, Alpharetta, Georgia,

On June 8, 2001, we purchased an existing freestanding retail property known as Jo-Ann Fabrics located on approximately 3.445 acres and containing 38,418 gross leasable square feet. The property is located at 965 North Point Drive, in Alpharetta, Georgia.

We purchased the Jo-Ann Fabrics building from 965 North Point Commons, LLC, an unaffiliated third party. Our total acquisition cost, including expenses, was approximately $4,902,000. This amount may increase by additional costs which have not yet been finally determined. We expect any additional costs to be insignificant. Our acquisition cost is approximately $128 per square foot of leasable space.

We purchased this property with our own funds. However, we expect to place financing on the property at a later date.

The Jo-Ann Fabrics building was completed in 2000. It is a one-story, single-tenant, retail building. As of June 1, 2001, this property was 100% leased by Jo-Ann Fabrics (a fabric and craft supply retail store).

In evaluating this property as a potential acquisition and determining the appropriate amount of consideration to be paid for the property, we considered a variety of factors including overall valuation of net rental income, location, demographics, price per square foot, quality of tenant, length of lease, occupancy and the fact that overall rental rate is comparable to market rates. We believe that this property is well located, has acceptable roadway access, is well maintained and has been professionally managed. This property will be subject to competition from similar shopping centers within its market area, and its economic performance could be affected by changes in local economic conditions. We did not consider any other factors materially relevant to the decision to acquire this property.

We do not anticipate making any significant repairs and improvements to this property over the next few years. However, if we were to make any repairs or improvements, the tenant would be obligated to pay a substantial portion of any monies spent pursuant to the provisions of their lease.

One tenant, Jo-Ann Fabrics leases 100% of the total gross leasable area of the property. The lease with this tenant requires the tenant to pay base annual rent on a monthly basis as follows:

     

Base Rent

   
 

Approximate

 

Per Square

   
 

GLA Leased

% of Total

Foot Per

Lease

Term

Lessee

(Sq. Ft.)

GLA

Annum ($)

Beginning

To

Jo-Ann Fabrics

38,418

100

12.85

11/01/00

01/31/06

     

13.35

02/01/06

01/31/11

     

13.85

02/01/11

01/31/16

  Option 1

   

14.35

02/01/16

01/31/21

  Option 2

   

14.85

02/01/21

01/31/26

  Option 3

   

15.35

02/01/26

01/31/31

For federal income tax purposes, the depreciable basis in this property will be approximately $3,700,000.When we calculate depreciation expense for tax purposes, we will use the straight-line method. We depreciate buildings and improvements based upon estimated useful lives of 40 and 20 years, respectively.

As of June 1, 2001, all of the 38,418 square feet of this property was leased to Jo-Ann Fabrics. The following table provides information relating to that lease:

 

ApproximateGLA Leased

 

Renewal

Current Annual

Base Rent Per Square Foot

Lessee

(Sq. Ft.)

Lease Ends

Options

Rent ($)

Per Annum ($)

           

Jo-Ann Fabrics

38,418

1/31/16

3/5 yr.

493,671

12.85

           

In general, Jo-Ann Fabrics pays all real estate taxes, insurance and common area maintenance costs. We are responsible for the roof and structure of the property.

Year Ending December 31,

Number of Leases Expiring

Approx. GLA of Expiring Leases (Sq. Ft.)

Annual Base Rent of Expiring Leases     ($)    

Total Annual Base Rent     ($)    

Average Base Rent Per Square Foot Under Expiring   Leases  ($)

Percent of Total Building GLA Represented By Expiring Leases     (%)   

Percent of Annual Base Rent Represented By Expiring Leases    (%)   

               

2001

-

-

-

493,671

-

-

-

2002

-

-

-

493,671

-

-

-

2003

-

-

-

493,671

-

-

-

2004

-

-

-

493,671

-

-

-

2005

-

-

-

493,671

-

-

-

2006

-

-

-

493,671

-

-

-

2007

-

-

-

512,880

-

-

-

2008

-

-

-

512,880

-

-

-

2009

-

-

-

512,880

-

-

-

2010

-

-

-

512,880

-

-

-

 

We received an appraisal which states that it was prepared in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice for a Limited Appraisal Report of the Appraisal Foundation by an independent appraiser who is a member of the Appraisal Institute. The appraisal reported a fair market value for the Jo-Ann Fabrics building, as of April 10, 2001, to be $5,000,000. Appraisals are estimates of value and should not be relied on as a measure of true worth or realizable value.

 

Woodstock Square Shopping Center, Atlanta, Georgia

On June 7, 2001, we purchased an existing shopping center known as Woodstock Square located on approximately 21 acres and containing 218,819 gross leasable square feet. The center is located at 120-142 Woodstock Square Avenue, in Atlanta, Georgia.

We purchased Woodstock Square from the Sembler Family Partnership, an unaffiliated third party. Our total acquisition cost, including expenses, was approximately $27,592,000. This amount may increase by additional costs, which have not yet been finally determined. We expect any additional costs to be insignificant. Our acquisition cost is approximately $126 per square foot of leasable space.

We purchased this property with our own funds. However, we expect to place financing on the property at a later date.

In evaluating this property as a potential acquisition and determining the appropriate amount of consideration to be paid for the property, we considered a variety of factors including overall valuation of net rental income, location, demographics, tenant mix, quality of tenants, length of leases, price per square foot, occupancy and the fact that overall rental rates at the shopping center are comparable to market rates. We believe that this property is well located, has acceptable roadway access, attracts high-quality tenants, is well maintained and has been professionally managed. This property will be subject to competition from similar shopping centers within its market area, and its economic performance could be affected by changes in local economic conditions. We did not consider any other factors materially relevant to the decision to acquire this property.

We do not anticipate making any significant repairs and improvements to this property over the next few years. However, if we were to make any repairs or improvements, the tenants would be obligated to pay a substantial portion of any monies spent pursuant to the provisions of their respective leases.

Woodstock Square was completed in 2001. Woodstock Square is comprised of three one-story, multi-tenant, retail buildings and one outlot building. As of June 1, 2001, this property was approximately 97% leased. A SuperTarget department store is located at the property and was not included in this transaction.

Three tenants, Kohl's (a department clothing store), Old Navy (a clothing retail store) and Office Max (an office products retail store), each lease more than 10% of the total gross leasable area of the property. The leases with these tenants require the tenants to pay base annual rent on a monthly basis as follows:

     

Base Rent

   
 

Approximate

 

Per Square

   
 

GLA Leased

% of Total

Foot Per

Lease

Term

Lessee

(Sq. Ft.)

GLA

Annum ($)

Beginning

To

           

Kohl's

86,584

40

8.78

03/01/01

01/31/12

     

8.95

02/01/12

01/31/22

  Option 1

   

9.20

02/01/22

01/31/27

  Option 2

   

9.45

02/01/27

01/31/32

  Option 3

   

9.70

02/01/32

01/31/37

  Option 4

   

9.95

02/01/37

01/31/42

           

Old Navy

25,000

11

11.50

04/01/01

01/31/07

  Option 1

   

12.74

02/01/07

01/31/13

  Option 2

   

14.12

02/01/13

01/31/19

           

Office Max

23,500

11

12.00

04/01/01

01/31/12

     

7.14

02/01/12

01/31/17

  Option 1

   

13.00

02/01/17

01/31/22

  Option 2

   

14.00

02/01/22

01/31/27

  Option 3

   

15.00

02/01/27

01/31/32

  Option 4

   

16.00

02/01/32

01/31/37

           

 

For federal income tax purposes, the depreciable basis in this property will be approximately $21,000,000. When we calculate depreciation expense for tax purposes, we will use the straight-line method. We depreciate buildings and improvements based upon estimated useful lives of 40 and 20 years, respectively.

 

As of June 1, 2001, a total 212,019 square feet was leased to 19 tenants at this property. The following table sets forth certain information with respect to those leases:

 

ApproximateGLA Leased

 

Renewal

Current Annual

Base Rent Per Square Foot

Lessee

(Sq. Ft.)

Lease Ends

Options

Rent ($)

Per Annum ($)

           

Powertel

1,400

04/04

2/3 yr.

28,000

20.00

Sun City Tanning

1,600

08/04

1/3 yr.

30,400

19.00

GNC

1,400

03/06

2/5 yr.

26,600

19.00

Hang-Ups

1,600

03/06

2/5 yr.

29,600

18.50

Hot Nails

1,200

03/06

1/5 yr.

24,000

20.00

Mattress Expo

5,200

03/06

1/5 yr.

114,400

22.00

Supercuts

1,200

03/06

1/5 yr.

25,200

21.00

Famous Footwear

8,000

05/06

2/5 yr.

120,000

15.00

Dress Barn

7,200

01/07

2/5 yr.

129,600

18.00

Old Navy

25,000

01/07

2/6 yr.

287,500

11.50

Bath & Body   Works

2,800

03/11

2/5 yr.

55,720

19.90

Clothesline

3,500

03/11

2/5 yr.

64,750

18.50

Payless Shoes

2,800

03/11

2/5 yr.

56,000

20.00

Atlanta Bread   Company

4,000

04/11

2/5 yr.

76,000

19.00

Lane Bryant

5,000

04/11

2/5 yr.

99,500

19.90

Ultra 3 Salon

10,800

05/11

3/5 yr.

173,880

16.10

PETsMART

19,235

05/16

4/5 yr.

228,897

11.90

Office Max

23,500

01/17

4/5 yr.

282,000

12.00

Kohl's

86,584

01/22

4/5 yr.

760,208

8.78

Vacant

6,800

       
           

In general, each tenant pays its proportionate share of real estate taxes, insurance and common area maintenance costs, although the leases with some tenants provide that the tenant's liability for such expenses is limited in some way, usually so that their liability for such expenses does not exceed a specified amount.

 

Year Ending December 31,

Number of Leases Expiring

Approx. GLA of Expiring Leases (Sq. Ft.)

Annual Base Rent of Expiring Leases     ($)    

Total Annual Base Rent     ($)    

Average Base Rent Per Square Foot Under Expiring Leases
($)

Percent of Total Building GLA Represented By Expiring Leases     (%)   

Percent of Annual Base Rent Represented By Expiring Leases    (%)   

               

2001

-

-

-

2,601,855

-

-

-

2002

-

-

-

2,612,255

-

-

-

2003

-

-

-

2,614,455

-

-

-

2004

2

3,000

62,800

2,616,655

20.93

1.37

2.40

2005

-

-

-

2,555,055

-

-

-

2006

5

17,400

317,000

2,555,055

18.22

7.95

12.41

2007

2

32,300

417,100

2,266,072

12.95

14.72

18.41

2008

-

-

-

1,848,972

-

-

-

2009

-

-

-

1,848,972

-

-

-

2010

-

-

-

1,848,972

-

-

-

               

For purposes of the above table, the "total annual base rent" column represents annualized base rent. For purposes of this column, we made no assumptions regarding the re-leasing of expiring leases. Therefore, as each lease expires, no amount is included in this column for any subsequent year for that lease. In view of the assumption made with regard to total annual base rent, the percent of annual base rent represented by expiring leases may not be reflective of the expected actual percentages. This is not indicative of or a prediction of future actual results. It is the opinion of our management that the space for expiring leases will be re-leased at market rates existing at the time of the expiration of those leases.

We received a letter appraisal which states that it was prepared in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Foundation by an independent appraiser who is a member of the Appraisal Institute. The appraisal reported an "as is" market value for Woodstock Square Shopping Center, as of June 3, 2001, of $28,000,000. Appraisals are estimates of value and should not be relied on as a measure of true worth or realizable value.

 

 

Tenants

The following chart updates information included in the chart on page 93 of our Prospectus and sets forth information regarding the largest tenants at our properties and includes any tenant leasing more than 3% of the total gross leasable area of our properties or any tenant whose annualized base rent represents 3% or more of our 2001 annualized base rent based on the properties owned as of June 11, 2001.

Total number of

Gross leasable area

Percent of total gross leasable area

Annualized base rent

Percent of total annualized base rent

Tenant

Stores

(Sq. Ft.)

(%)

($)

(%)

           

Barnes & Noble

2

52,000

1.76

862,500

3.05

JC Penney

2

92,728

3.13

898,644

3.18

JoAnn Fabrics

2

84,388

2.85

999,341

3.53

Kash N' Karry

2

94,255

3.18

633,824

2.24

K-Mart

2

193,364

6.53

1,290,666

4.57

Lowes Home Center

2

262,072

8.85

1,696,897

6.00

PETsMART

7

165,198

5.58

2,037,498

7.21

Publix

4

155,976

5.27

1,193,760

4.22

Wal-Mart

1

204,170

6.90

1,104,560

3.91

Winn-Dixie

3

139,261

4.70

1,072,200

3.79

           

 

Plan of Distribution

As of January 31, 2001, we sold 13,687,349 shares in our first offering resulting in gross proceeds of $136,454,948. In addition, we received $200,000 from our Advisor in exchange for 20,000 shares. Inland Securities Corporation, an affiliate of our Advisor, served as dealer manager of this offering and was entitled to receive selling commissions and certain other fees, as discussed further in our Prospectus. As of January 31, 2001, we had incurred $11,588,024 of commissions and fees payable to Inland Securities Corporation, which results in our receipt of $125,066,924 of net proceeds from the sale of those 13,687,349 shares. As of January 31, 2001 the first offering terminated. Our current offering began February 1, 2001. As of June 11, 2001, we had sold 5,139,484 shares in our current offering resulting in gross proceeds of $50,694,837. Inland Securities Corporation, an affiliate of our Advisor, serves as dealer manager of this offering and is entitled to receive selling commissions and certain other fees, as discussed further in our Prospectus. As of June 11, 2001, we had incurred $3,910,011 of commissions and fees payable to Inland Securities Corporation, which results in our receipt of $46,784,826 of net proceeds from the sale of those 5,139,494 shares. An additional 446,106 shares have been sold pursuant to our Distribution Reinvestment Program as of June 11, 2001, for which we have received additional net proceeds of $4,238,007. As of June 11, 2001, we had repurchased 89,843 shares through our Share Repurchase Program resulting in disbursements totaling $814,629. As a result, our net offering proceeds from both offerings total approximately $175,075,129 as of June 11, 2001, including amounts raised through our Distribution Reinvestment Program, net of shares repurchased through our Share Repurchase Program.

 

We also pay an affiliate of our Advisor, which is owned principally by individuals who are affiliates of Inland, fees to manage and lease our properties. For the year ended December 31, 2000 and for the period ending December 31, 1999, we have incurred and paid property management fees of $926,978 and $225,665, respectively. Our Advisor may also receive an annual asset management fee of not more than 1% of our average invested assets, to be paid quarterly. For the year ended December 31, 2000, we had incurred $120,000 of such fees. For the year ending December 31, 1999, we had not paid or incurred any asset management fees. We may pay expenses associated with property acquisitions of up to .5% of the money that we raise in this Offering but in no event will we pay acquisition expenses on any individual property that exceeds 6% of its purchase price. Acquisition expenses totaling approximately $1,614,000 are included in the purchase prices we have paid for all our properties purchased through June 11, 2001. As of June 11, 2001, we had invested approximately $128,262,000 in properties that we purchased for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $292,029,000. After expenditures for organization and offering expenses and acquisition expenses and establishing appropriate reserves, as of June 11, 2001, we had net offering proceeds of approximately $6,000,000 available for investment in additional properties.