XML 39 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
CAPITAL STRUCTURE
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
CAPITAL STRUCTURE [Abstract]  
CAPITAL STRUCTURE
 5. CAPITAL STRUCTURE
 
As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, there were 61,142,756 and 52,424,649 shares, respectively, of the Company's common stock issued and outstanding.

Common Stock Issuances under Stock Option Plans

The Company received approximately $1.5 million from the exercise of stock options for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2013, resulting in the issuance of 370,352 shares and 378,366 shares, respectively, of common stock.
 
Common Stock Issuance under At-The-Market Sales Agreement
 
On April 30, 2012, the Company entered into a Sales Agreement with Cowen and Company, LLC ("Cowen"), under which the Company could, at its discretion, sell its common stock with a sales value of up to a maximum of $40.0 million through offerings deemed to be "at-the-market" ("ATM") on the NASDAQ Stock Market.  The Company pays Cowen as the sole sales agent a commission of 3.0% of the gross sales price for any sales made under the ATM.  The common stock is sold at prevailing market prices at the time of the sale of common stock, and, as a result, prices will vary.

On July 3, 2013, the Company and Cowen amended and restated the Sales Agreement (the "Amended and Restated Sales Agreement") to increase the aggregate gross sales proceeds that may be raised to $100,000,000, of which approximately $37.1 million was previously sold pursuant to the original Sales Agreement dated April 30, 2012.
 
Sales in the ATM offerings are being made pursuant to the prospectus supplement dated April 30, 2012, as amended by Amendment No. 2 dated July 3, 2013, which supplements the Company's prospectus dated February 3, 2012, filed as part of the shelf registration statement that was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on February 3, 2012.  Cumulatively through September 30, 2013, the Company sold 7,599,474 shares under the ATM offerings at a weighted-average selling price of $7.08 per share for net proceeds of approximately $52.1 million.

 Common Stock Warrants
 
For the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2013, the Company received approximately $3.1 million and $9.8 million, respectively, from the exercise of warrants in exchange for the issuance of 1,067,445 shares and 3,400,725 shares, respectively, of the Company's common stock.
 
The table reflects the number of common stock warrants outstanding as of September 30, 2013:

(In thousands, except per share amounts)
 
Number of shares
exercisable
  
Exercise
price
 
Expiration date
Issued in connection with Encode merger
  
233
  
$
2.87
 
12/13/2015
Issued to placement agents in August 2009
  
65
  
$
1.50
 
7/31/2014
TorreyPines warrants assumed in 2009 Merger
  
4
  
$
157.08
 
9/26/2015
Issued to registered direct investors in Dec. 2009
  
75
  
$
2.45
 
12/22/2014
Issued to private placement investors in Aug. 2010
  
670
  
$
3.075
 
8/12/2015
Issued to placement agent in Aug. 2010
  
98
  
$
3.075
 
8/12/2015
 
        
                 
Total warrants outstanding
  
1,145
  
$
3.37
*
 
 
        
                 
*     Weighted-average exercise price
        
    

The warrants issued by the Company in the August 2010 private placement and the December 2009 equity financing contain a conditional obligation that may require the Company to transfer assets to repurchase the warrants upon the occurrence of potential future events.  Under ASC 480, a financial instrument that may require the issuer to settle the obligation by transferring assets is classified as a liability.  Therefore, the Company has classified the warrants from both financings as liabilities and will mark them to fair value at each period end.
 
A Black-Scholes option-pricing model was used to obtain the fair value of the warrant liabilities. These warrants were issued in the December 2009 and August 2010 equity financings using the following assumptions at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

 
 
December 2009 equity financing Series A
  
August 2010 private placement
investors and placement agent
 
 
 
September 30, 2013
  
December 31, 2012
  
September 30, 2013
  
December 31, 2012
 
Fair value ($ millions)
 
$
0.9
  
$
2.6
  
$
9.4
  
$
13.8
 
Black-Scholes inputs:
                
  Stock price
 
$
14.92
  
$
5.85
  
$
14.92
  
$
5.85
 
  Exercise price
 
$
2.45
  
$
2.45
  
$
3.075
  
$
3.075
 
  Risk free interest rate
  
0.21
%
  
0.25
%
  
0.29
%
  
0.31
%
  Volatility
  
95
%
  
100
%
  
95
%
  
112
%
  Expected term (years)
  
1.25
   
2.0
   
1.75
   
2.5
 
  Dividend
  
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
 
 
Marked-to-Market
 
As a result of the marking-to-market of the warrant liability at quarter-end and the day prior to the exercise of warrants subject to warrant liability accounting, the Company recorded a loss of approximately $6.0 million and a gain of approximately $1.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and August 31, 2012, respectively, and a loss of approximately $12.0 million and a gain of approximately $1.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and August 31, 2012, respectively, in the line item adjustment to fair value of common stock warrants in its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss.

Below is the activity of the warrant liabilities for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and August 31, 2012:

 
 
For the nine months ended
 
(In millions)
 
September 30,
2013
  
August 31,
2012
 
Fair value of December 2009 direct offering warrants (including placement agent warrants) at beginning of the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2013 and August 31, 2012
 
$
2.6
  
$
6.7
 
December 2009 direct offering warrants exercised
  
(4.2
)
  
(4.5
)
Adjustment to mark to market common stock warrants
  
2.5
   
0.7
 
December 2009 direct offering common stock warrant liability at fair value at September 30, 2013 and August 31, 2012
  
0.9
   
2.9
 
 
        
Fair value of August 2010 private placement warrants (including broker warrants) at beginning of the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2013 and August 31, 2012
  
13.8
   
18.7
 
August 2010 private placement warrants exercised
  
(13.9
)
  
(2.7
)
Adjustment to mark to market common stock warrants
  
9.5
   
(1.6
)
August 2010 private placement common stock warrant liability at fair value at September 30, 2013 and August 31, 2012
  
9.4
   
14.4
 
 
        
Total warrant liability at September 30, 2013 and August 31, 2012, respectively
 
$
10.3
  
$
17.3
 

Effect of Raptor's Stock Price and Volatility Assumptions on the Calculation of Fair Value of Warrant Liabilities
 
As discussed above, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model as its method of valuation for warrants that are subject to warrant liability accounting.  The determination of the fair value as of the reporting date is affected by Raptor's stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables which could provide differing variables.  These variables include, but are not limited to, expected stock price volatility over the term of the security and risk-free interest rate.  In addition, the Black-Scholes option pricing model requires the input of an expected life for the securities which the Company has estimated based upon the stage of its development.  The fair value of the warrant liability is revalued each balance sheet date utilizing Black-Scholes valuation model computations with the decrease or increase in fair value being reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Loss as other income or expense, respectively.  The Company's reported net loss was approximately $57.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.  If the Company's September 30, 2013 closing stock price had been 10% lower, its net loss would have been approximately $1.2 million lower.  If the Company's September 30, 2013 closing stock price had been 10% higher, its net loss would have been approximately $1.2 million higher.  If the Company's September 30, 2013 volatility assumption had been 10% lower, its net loss would have been approximately $0.1 million lower.  If the Company's September 30, 2013 volatility assumption had been 10% higher, its net loss would have been approximately $0.1 million higher.