Asset Impairments	3 Months Ended
Mar. 30, 2012
Gain on Sale of Intellectual Property and Asset Impairments [Abstract]
Asset Impairments	10. Asset Impairments During the second quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company determined that indicators of impairment existed based on two factors: (1) its operating results for the fiscal quarter ended March 30, 2012 and (2) decreases in sales forecasts for future periods. As a result of these indicators of impairment, the Company tested its amortizable intangible assets by comparing the sum of the undiscounted cash flows related to customer relationship, patent and R&D intangible assets to their respective carrying values as of March 30, 2012. The sum of undiscounted cash flows related to the customer relationships intangible asset was less than its carrying value. As a result the Company recorded an impairment charge of $15.4 million which represented the difference between its fair value and its carrying value as of March 30, 2012. The sum of undiscounted cash flows related to the patent and R&D intangible assets was greater than their carrying value as of March 30, 2012. As a result, the Company did not record any impairment charge on the patent and R&D intangible assets as of March 30, 2012. The Company tested its indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment by comparing the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible assets to their carrying amounts. The fair value of the IPR&D intangible asset was determined based on a discounted cash flow model using the revised sales forecast for each project that continued to be classified as IPR&D as of March 30, 2012. Based on this, the C ompany determined that the fair value of the IPR&D intangible asset was less than the carrying amount of the IPR&D intangible asset as of March 30, 2012, resulting in an impairment charge of $6.0 million. An IPR&D project completed in the fiscal quarter ended March 30, 2012 had a fair value of $1.9 million compared with the historical carrying value of the project in IPR&D of $2.8 million as of March 30, 2012. This resulted in an impairment charge of $0.9 million. The fair value of the trade name and trademarks intangible asset, based on a discounted cash flow model using the revised sales forecast was less than the carrying amount of trade name and trademarks which resulted in an impairment charge of $1.1 million. As a result of these indicators of impairment described above, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $31.5 million in the fiscal quarter ended March 30, 2012 representing the excess of goodwill over the implied fair value of goodwill calculated as of March 30, 2012. There were no asset impairments recorded during the Predecessor fiscal quarter and six fiscal months ended April 1, 2011.

Asset Impairments

3 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2012

Gain on Sale of Intellectual Property and Asset Impairments [Abstract]

10. Asset Impairments

During the second quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company determined that indicators of impairment existed based on two factors: (1) its operating results for the fiscal quarter ended March 30, 2012 and (2) decreases in sales forecasts for future periods. As a result of these indicators of impairment, the Company tested its amortizable intangible assets by comparing the sum of the undiscounted cash flows related to customer relationship, patent and R&D intangible assets to their respective carrying values as of March 30, 2012. The sum of undiscounted cash flows related to the customer relationships intangible asset was less than its carrying value. As a result the Company recorded an impairment charge of $15.4 million which represented the difference between its fair value and its carrying value as of March 30, 2012. The sum of undiscounted cash flows related to the patent and R&D intangible assets was greater than their carrying value as of March 30, 2012. As a result, the Company did not record any impairment charge on the patent and R&D intangible assets as of March 30, 2012.

The Company tested its indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment by comparing the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible assets to their carrying amounts. The fair value of the IPR&D intangible asset was determined based on a discounted cash flow model using the revised sales forecast for each project that continued to be classified as IPR&D as of March 30, 2012. Based on this, the C

ompany determined that the fair value of the IPR&D intangible asset was less than the carrying amount of the IPR&D intangible asset as of March 30, 2012, resulting in an impairment charge of $6.0 million.

An IPR&D project completed in the fiscal quarter ended March 30, 2012 had a fair value of $1.9 million compared with the historical carrying value of the project in IPR&D of $2.8 million as of March 30, 2012. This resulted in an impairment charge of $0.9 million. The fair value of the trade name and trademarks intangible asset, based on a discounted cash flow model using the revised sales forecast was less than the carrying amount of trade name and trademarks which resulted in an impairment charge of $1.1 million.

As a result of these indicators of impairment described above, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $31.5 million in the fiscal quarter ended March 30, 2012 representing the excess of goodwill over the implied fair value of goodwill calculated as of March 30, 2012.

There were no asset impairments recorded during the Predecessor fiscal quarter and six fiscal months ended April 1, 2011.