A summary of the significant accounting policies followed by the Company in the preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements follows:

The Company’s accounting principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Estimates having relatively higher significance include stock-based compensation, contract manufacturing accruals, and income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates and changes in estimates may occur.

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.

The Company follows the provisions of ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, which establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The Company considers its investments in money market funds of $11.6 million and $41.7 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, included in cash and cash equivalents, to be Level 1, which are based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities accessible to the reporting entity at the measurement date. The estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments, which include cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities approximates their carrying value, based upon their short-term maturities or prevailing interest rates.

The Company records stock-based payments at fair value. The measurement date for compensation expense related to awards is generally the date of the grant. The fair value of awards is recognized as an expense in the statement of operations over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period. The fair value of options is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. This option valuation model requires the use of assumptions including, among others, the volatility of stock price, the expected term of the option, and the risk-free interest rate.

The following assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of stock options granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model:

	2019	2018
Risk-free interest rate	1.68% - 2.57%	2.27% - 2.98%
Expected life (years)	6	6
Volatility	60%	60%
Dividend rate	0%	0%

Due to its limited operating history and a limited trading history of its common stock in relation to the life of its standard option grants, the Company estimates the volatility of its stock in consideration of a number of factors including the volatility of comparable public companies. The expected term of a stock option granted to employees and directors (including non-employee directors) is based on the average of the contractual term (generally 10 years) and the vesting period. For other non-employee options, the expected term is the contractual term. The assumed dividend yield is based upon the Company’s expectation of not paying dividends in the foreseeable future. The Company recognizes forfeitures related to employee stock-based awards as they occur. The risk-free rate for periods within the expected life of the option is based upon the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. Option awards are granted at an exercise price equal to the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market on the date of grant.

In-process research and development (“IPRD”) represents the value of the three G-protein-coupled receptors (“GPCR”) targets (the “Targets”) from the GPCR Target pools of Anchor to which the Company obtained the rights in its March 20, 2015 acquisition of Anchor. IPRD was recorded at fair value and is an indefinite-lived intangible asset. The Company reviews IPRD annually to determine if any adverse conditions exist or a change in circumstances has occurred that would indicate impairment or a change in the remaining useful life of the asset. There were no triggering events or circumstances that would indicate IPRD was impaired as of December 31, 2019 or 2018.

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price (consideration paid plus net liabilities assumed) of an acquired business over the fair value of the underlying net tangible and intangible assets. The Company evaluates the recoverability of goodwill according to ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), which it adopted in the fourth quarter of 2018, annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of goodwill might be impaired. The Company may opt to perform a qualitative assessment or a quantitative impairment test to determine whether goodwill is impaired. The Company’s goodwill is allocated to a single reporting unit. If the Company were to determine based on a qualitative assessment that it was more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit was less than its carrying value, a quantitative impairment test would then be performed. The quantitative impairment test compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, a goodwill impairment would be recognized for the difference. As a result of the Complete Response Letter from the FDA and the subsequent decline in the Company’s stock price, goodwill was evaluated for impairment and it was determined that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying value and no impairment existed. The Company performed a qualitative analysis of goodwill as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, in which management concluded that it was more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount.

Gains and losses arising from transactions and revaluation of balances denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars are recorded in foreign currency transaction gain/(loss) on the consolidated statements of operations.

The Company is primarily subject to U.S. federal and Massachusetts state income taxes. The Company’s tax returns for years 2015 through present are open to tax examinations by U.S. federal and state tax authorities; however, carryforward attributes that were generated prior to January 1, 2015 remain subject to adjustment upon examination if they either have been utilized or will be utilized in a future period. For federal and state income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based upon temporary differences between the financial statement and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. Deferred income taxes are based upon prescribed rates and enacted laws applicable to periods in which differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Accordingly, the Company provides a valuation allowance, if necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts that are realizable.

The tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Company’s tax returns are required to be evaluated to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet a more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax expense in the current year. There were no uncertain tax positions that require accrual or disclosure in the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax, if any, in income tax expense. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company had no accruals for interest or penalties related to income tax matters.

Basic and diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss in each period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during such period. For the periods presented, common stock equivalents, consisting of stock-based awards, were not included in the calculation of the diluted net loss per share because to do so would be anti-dilutive.

Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company views its operations and manages its business in one operating segment, which is the business of a pharmaceutical company focused on the acquisition, development, and commercialization of therapies for serious rare and life-threatening diseases with significant unmet medical needs.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”), which establishes new accounting and disclosure requirements for leases. ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to classify most leases as either finance or operating leases and to initially recognize a lease liability and right-of-use asset. The Company adopted ASU 2016-02 in the first quarter of 2019 using the effective date approach to recognize and measure leases as of the adoption date. The Company has elected to utilize the available practical expedient to not separate lease components from non-lease components as well as the package of practical expedients that allows the Company not to reassess (1) whether any expired or existing contracts as of the adoption date are or contain a lease, (2) lease classification for any expired or existing leases as of the adoption date and (3) initial direct costs for any existing leases as of the adoption date. As a result of the adoption of this guidance, the Company recorded a non-cash transaction to recognize on January 1, 2019 lease liabilities totaling $0.4 million and right-of-use-assets totaling $0.4 million, which will be amortized over the remaining terms of the leases.

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2018-07”). This new guidance expands the scope of ASC Topic 718 to include share-based payments granted to nonemployees in exchange for goods or services used or consumed in an entity’s own operations and supersedes the guidance in ASC Topic 505-50. Equity-classified nonemployee awards are measured on the grant date, rather than on the earlier of (1) the performance commitment date or (2) the date at which the nonemployee’s performance is complete. Awards to nonemployees are measured by estimating the fair value of the equity instruments to be issued, rather than either the fair value of the goods or services received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever can be measured more reliably. Entities may use the expected term to measure nonemployee options or elect to use the contractual term as the expected term, on an award-by-award basis. The Company adopted ASU 2018-07 in the first quarter of 2019. There was no impact on the Company’s financial statements as a result of the adoption of this guidance.