DEF 14A 1 a2021proxystatement.htm DEF 14A Document
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No.     )
 

Filed by the Registrant  ý                             Filed by a party other than the Registrant  
Check the appropriate box:
Preliminary Proxy Statement
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
ý  
Definitive Proxy Statement
Definitive Additional Materials
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than The Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
ý  
No fee required.
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:     
(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5)Total fee paid:
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)Amount Previously Paid:
(2)Form, Schedule or Registration No.:
(3)Filing Party:
(4)Date Filed:


g329621pcpg002newa011a.jpg
2140 Lake Park Blvd.
Richardson, Texas 75080
April 8, 2021

Dear Stockholders:

It is my pleasure to invite you to the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Lennox International Inc. The meeting will be held virtually at 10:30 a.m., Central Daylight Savings Time, on Thursday, May 20, 2021.

    We are implementing a virtual-only meeting format in order to leverage technology to enhance stockholder access to the Annual Meeting by enabling stockholder attendance and participation from anywhere in the world, without cost. In addition, the virtual-only meeting format enables us to protect the health and safety of all attendees, particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. We believe that the virtual-only meeting format gives stockholders the opportunity to exercise the same rights as if they had attended an in-person meeting and believe that this format increases stockholder access and encourages participation and communication with our Board of Directors and management.

Lennox has elected to deliver our proxy materials to the majority of our stockholders over the Internet. This delivery process allows us to provide stockholders with the information they need while conserving natural resources and lowering the cost of delivery. On or about April 8, 2021, we mailed to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) containing instructions on how to access our Proxy Statement for our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and fiscal 2020 Annual Report to stockholders. The Notice also provides instructions on how to vote online or by telephone and includes instructions on how to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail.

    The accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement describe the items of business that will be discussed and voted upon during the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

    YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. Whether or not you plan to attend the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we urge you to vote and submit your proxy by Internet, telephone or mail, pursuant to the instructions on your Notice or your Proxy Card. We encourage you to vote by Internet or telephone as those methods offer the most convenience and save the Company postage and other costs. Please use the website or telephone number shown on your Notice or your Proxy Card to vote by Internet or telephone. If you attend the virtual Annual Meeting you will have the right to revoke the proxy and vote your shares online during the meeting.

On behalf of management and our Board of Directors, I want to thank you for your continued support and confidence in 2021.
 
Sincerely,
g329621g70p851.jpg
Todd M. Bluedorn
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer



g329621pcpg002newa011a.jpg
2140 Lake Park Blvd.
Richardson, Texas 75080
April 8, 2021
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 20, 2021
 
The 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Lennox International Inc. will be held virtually on Thursday, May 20, 2021 at 10:30 a.m., Central Daylight Savings Time, to:
 
elect three Class II directors to hold office for a three-year term expiring at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders;
conduct an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers (“NEOs”) as disclosed in this Proxy Statement;
ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2021 fiscal year; and
transact any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in accordance with the terms of our Bylaws.
The Board of Directors has determined that our stockholders of record at the close of business on March 23, 2021 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 20, 2021. This Proxy Statement and the Annual Report to Stockholders are available on our website at www.lennoxinternational.com and also at the website appearing on your Notice or your Proxy Card. This Proxy Statement, Proxy Card, and Annual Report to Stockholders, which includes our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, accompany this Notice.

Most stockholders have a choice of voting on the Internet, by telephone or by mail. Please refer to your Notice, Proxy Card or other voting instructions included with these proxy materials for information on the voting method(s) available to you. If you vote by Internet or telephone, you do not need to return your Proxy Card. If your shares are held in the name of a brokerage firm, bank or other nominee of record, follow the voting instructions you receive from such holder of record to vote your shares.

Please see “General Information Regarding the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders - Virtual Annual Meeting Date and Time” for a discussion of the virtual Annual Meeting of Stockholders date, time and process.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
g329621g36z541.jpg
John D. Torres
Corporate Secretary


TABLE OF CONTENTS
 

-i-

GENERAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE 2021
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
Virtual Annual Meeting Date and Time
The 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Lennox International Inc. (also referred to in this Proxy Statement as the “Company,” “us,” “we,” or “our”) will be held on Thursday, May 20, 2021 at 10:30 a.m., Central Daylight Savings Time (“CDT”), in a virtual-only meeting format, using live webcast which provides stockholders the ability to participate in the Annual Meeting, vote their shares and ask questions. YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING IN PERSON.
We began mailing or making available this Proxy Statement and the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Proxy Card and Annual Report to Stockholders, which includes our Annual Report on Form 10-K, to our stockholders on or about April 8, 2021 for the purpose of soliciting proxies on behalf of our Board of Directors (the “Board”).
Benefits of a Virtual Annual Meeting
We are implementing a virtual-only meeting format in order to leverage technology to enhance stockholder access to the Annual Meeting by enabling stockholder attendance and participation from anywhere in the world, without cost. In addition, the virtual-only meeting format enables us to protect the health and safety of all attendees, particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. We believe that the virtual-only meeting format gives stockholders the opportunity to exercise the same rights as if they had attended an in-person meeting and believe that this format increases stockholder access and encourages participation and communication with our Board and management.
Attendance at the Virtual Annual Meeting
Only stockholders of record and beneficial owners of shares of our common stock as of the close of business on March 23, 2021, the record date, may attend and participate in the Annual Meeting, including voting and submitting questions to be answered at the virtual Annual Meeting.
In order to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, you must register at www.proxydocs.com/LII. Upon completing your registration, you will receive further instructions by email, including a unique link that will allow you access to the virtual Annual Meeting and to vote and submit questions to be answered at the virtual Annual Meeting. As part of the registration process, you must enter the control number located on your proxy card, voting instruction form, or Notice of Internet Availability. If you are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee, as part of the registration process you will also need to provide the registered name on your account and the name of your broker, bank or other nominee as part of the registration process.
On the day of the virtual Annual Meeting, May 20, 2021, stockholders may begin to log in to the virtual Annual Meeting 15 minutes prior to the start time. The virtual Annual Meeting will begin promptly at 10:30 a.m. CDT. We will have technicians ready to assist you with any technical difficulties you may have accessing the virtual Annual Meeting. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual Annual Meeting platform, including any difficulties voting, you may call the technical support number that will be included in your instructional email.

Questions at the Virtual Annual Meeting
Our virtual Annual Meeting allows stockholders to submit questions before the virtual Annual Meeting date. During a designated question and answer period at the virtual Annual Meeting, we will respond to questions submitted by stockholders related to the purpose of the virtual Annual Meeting and our business. We will answer as many stockholder-submitted questions as time permits, and any questions that we are unable to address during the virtual Annual Meeting will be answered following the meeting. If we receive substantially similar questions, to avoid repetition we will group those questions together and provide a single response. We will also post questions submitted by stockholders and our answers on our website for a period of 60 days following the meeting.

1

Matters to be Voted On
At the meeting, you will be asked to vote on three proposals. Our Board recommends you vote “for” each of the director nominees in Proposal 1 and “for” Proposals 2 and 3. The proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting are:
 
Proposal 1: To elect three Class II directors to hold office for a three-year term expiring at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders;

Proposal 2: To conduct an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers (“NEOs”) as disclosed in this Proxy Statement; and

Proposal 3: To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2021 fiscal year.
Record Versus Beneficial Ownership of Shares
If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., you are the “stockholder of record” with respect to those shares. If you are a stockholder of record, we sent our proxy materials directly to you.
If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of shares held in street name. In that case, our proxy materials have been forwarded to you by your broker or bank, which is considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. Your broker or bank will also send you instructions on how to vote. If you have not heard from your broker or bank, please contact them as soon as possible.
Record Date and Number of Votes
You are entitled to vote if you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on March 23, 2021, the record date for our virtual Annual Meeting. At the close of business on the record date, there were 37,767,900 shares of our common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote.
Quorum Requirement
A quorum is required to transact business at the virtual Annual Meeting. To achieve a quorum at the Annual Meeting, stockholders holding a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote must be present either in person or represented by proxy. Shares held by us in treasury will not count towards the determination of a quorum.
If a quorum is not present at the virtual Annual Meeting, we expect the virtual Annual Meeting will be adjourned or postponed to solicit additional proxies. In such event, the Chairman or stockholders representing a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote at the virtual Annual Meeting and present in person or by proxy at the meeting may adjourn the virtual Annual Meeting.
Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes
If a broker or bank holds shares in “street name” (that is, in the name of a bank, broker, nominee or other holder of record) and the beneficial owner does not provide the broker or bank with specific voting instructions, the broker or bank only has discretion to vote on routine matters, and does not have discretion to vote on non-routine matters. If a broker or bank has not received voting instructions on the non-routine matters and therefore does not have discretion to vote on those non-routine matters, those uninstructed non-votes are referred to as “broker non-votes”.
Pursuant to New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules, Proposal 1 (election of directors) and Proposal 2 (advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs) are non-routine matters for which your broker or bank cannot exercise voting discretion if it does not receive voting instructions from you. Proposal 3 (ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2021 fiscal year) is a routine
2

matter for which your broker or bank may exercise voting discretion even if it does not receive voting instructions from you. As a result, if you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name, it is critical that you cast your vote in order for it to be counted on Proposals 1 and 2.
Broker non-votes will not be counted as votes “for” or “withheld” for Proposal 1, or “for” or “against” Proposal 2. Abstentions will not be counted as votes “for” or “withheld” for Proposal 1. Abstentions will be counted as votes “against” Proposals 2 and 3.
Vote Requirement for Each Proposal
If a quorum is present, our Bylaws require, for purposes of Proposal 1, that a director nominee receive a majority of the votes cast with respect to his or her election in an uncontested election (that is, the number of shares voted “for” a director nominee must exceed the number of “withheld” votes cast for that nominee) to be elected. Each of our director nominees is currently serving on the Board. If a nominee who is currently serving as a director is not re-elected, Delaware law provides that the director would continue to serve on the Board as a “holdover director.” Under our Bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines, each director submits an advance, contingent resignation that the Board may accept if stockholders do not re-elect the director. In that situation, our Board Governance Committee would make a recommendation to the Board about whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether to take other action. The Board would act on the Board Governance Committee’s recommendation, and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days from the date that the election results were certified.
If a quorum is present Proposal 3 (ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2021 fiscal year), will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote thereon.
Voting Procedures
Registered holders may vote online during the virtual Annual Meeting, by the Internet, by telephone, or, if they received a printed copy of these proxy materials, by mail. If your shares are held in street name, you will receive instructions from a bank, broker, nominee or other holder of record that you must follow in order for your shares to be voted. If you have not received voting instructions from your bank, broker, nominee or other holder of record, please contact them as soon as possible. We urge you to vote in advance of the virtual Annual Meeting to ensure there is a quorum and your votes are counted.
A representative of Mediant Communication will tabulate the votes and act as inspector of election at the Annual Meeting.
Changing Your Vote
You can revoke or change your vote on a proposal at any time before the virtual Annual Meeting for any reason by revoking your proxy. For stockholders of record, proxies may be revoked by delivering a written notice of revocation, bearing a later date than your proxy, to our Corporate Secretary at or before the virtual Annual Meeting. Proxies may also be revoked by:
submitting a new written proxy bearing a later date than a proxy you previously submitted;
voting again by Internet or telephone before 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 19, 2021; or
attending the virtual Annual Meeting and voting online.
In each case, the later submitted vote will be recorded and the earlier vote revoked. Any written notice of a revocation of a proxy should be sent to Lennox International Inc., 2140 Lake Park Blvd., Richardson, Texas 75080, Attention: Corporate Secretary. To be effective, the revocation must be received by our Corporate Secretary before the taking of the vote at the virtual Annual Meeting.
If your shares are held in street name, you must follow the specific voting directions provided to you by your bank, broker, nominee or other holder of record to change or revoke any instructions you have already provided. Alternatively, you may obtain a proxy from your bank, broker, nominee or other holder of record and provide it with your vote at the virtual Annual Meeting.
3

Other Business; Adjournments
We are not aware of any other business to be acted upon at the virtual Annual Meeting. However, if you have voted by proxy and other matters are properly presented at the virtual Annual Meeting for consideration in accordance with our Bylaws, the persons named in the accompanying Proxy Card will have discretion to act on those matters according to their best judgment or the Board’s recommendation. In the absence of a quorum, the Chairman or stockholders representing a majority of the votes present in person or by proxy at the meeting may adjourn the meeting.
4

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Our Bylaws provide that our Board may be composed of no less than three and no more than 15 members. The size of our Board is currently fixed at 11 members, divided into three classes, with each class serving a three-year term.
Upon the recommendation of the Board Governance Committee, the Board has nominated three Class II directors for re-election to our Board to hold office for a three-year term expiring at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. All Class I and III directors will continue in office until the expiration of their terms at the 2023 and 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, respectively. The process followed by the Board in nominating directors and the criteria considered for director nominees is described in the “Corporate Governance” section of this Proxy Statement.
John Major is currently a Class II director. Due to the Company’s mandatory age-based retirement provisions in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Mr. Major will retire immediately following the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Company and the Board thank him for his many years of valuable service.
Below we provide biographical information for each Class II director nominee and for each other director. For each director and director nominee, the information presented includes the positions held, principal occupation, and business experience as of April 1, 2021. The biographical description below for each director and director nominee also includes the specific experience, expertise, attributes and skills that led to the Board’s conclusion that such person should serve as a director of the Company at this time, in light of our business and structure.
If you do not wish to vote your shares for any particular nominee, you may withhold your vote for that particular nominee. If any Class II director nominee becomes unavailable to serve, the persons named in the accompanying Proxy Card may vote for any alternate designated by the incumbent Board, or the number of directors constituting the Board may be reduced.
The Board has nominated the following directors for re-election as Class II directors for three-year terms expiring at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders:

buckblackandwhite41.jpg
  
Sherry L. Buck, 57, has served as a director since July 2019. She is a member of the Audit Committee and the Public Policy Committee. Ms. Buck is Chief Financial Officer of W.L. Gore & Associates Inc., a private multinational manufacturing company specializing in products derived from fluoropolymers used in medical implants, fabric laminates, cable, venting and other applications across diverse industries. Prior to joining W.L. Gore in January of 2021 Ms. Buck was the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Waters Corporation, a New York Stock Exchange listed specialty measurement company serving the life, materials and food sciences industries. Prior to joining Waters in January 2017, Ms. Buck served as the Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of Libbey Inc., a global manufacturer and marketer of glass tableware products. Prior to this role, Ms. Buck spent nearly twenty years at Whirlpool Corporation, a leading global appliance manufacturer, in senior finance and operating leadership roles. She began her career at Price Waterhouse in Kansas City.

Ms. Buck holds a bachelor’s degree in accounting from the University of Missouri.

Ms. Buck contributes extensive financial expertise and leadership experience gained from positions in large global manufacturing companies.

5

g329621swienton1.jpg
  
Gregory T. Swienton, 71, has served as a director of our Company since 2010. He is the Chair of the Audit Committee and a member of the Board Governance Committee. Mr. Swienton was an adviser to Ryder System, Inc., a supplier of transportation, logistics and supply chain management solutions from May 2013 until May 2015. He previously was Executive Chairman of Ryder System, Inc., from January 2013 to May 2013, after having been Chairman of Ryder System, Inc. since May 2002 and Chief Executive Officer since November 2000. Mr. Swienton joined Ryder as President and Chief Operating Officer in June 1999. Before joining Ryder, Mr. Swienton was Senior Vice President-Growth Initiatives of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation (BNSF). Prior to that he was BNSF’s Senior Vice President-Coal and Agricultural Commodities Business Unit, and previously had been Senior Vice President of its Industrial and Consumer Units. He joined BNSF in June 1994 as Executive Vice President-Intermodal Business Unit. Prior to joining BNSF, Mr. Swienton was Executive Director-Europe and Africa of DHL Worldwide Express in Brussels, Belgium from 1991 to 1994, and prior to that, he was DHL’s Managing Director-Western and Eastern Europe from 1988 to 1990, also located in Brussels. For the five years prior to these assignments, Mr. Swienton was Regional Vice President of DHL Airways, Inc. in the United States. From 1971 to 1982, Mr. Swienton held various national account, sales and marketing positions with AT&T and Illinois Bell Telephone Company.

Mr. Swienton serves on the Board of Directors of CRST/Admiralty Holdings, a privately held transportation and logistics company. Mr. Swienton served on the Board of Directors of Harris Corporation, a supplier of communications and information technology products from 2000 to 2019.

Mr. Swienton contributes extensive international business experience, deep expertise in global distribution and supply chain innovations, as well as experience in growth initiatives, in his service as a director.

g329621teske1.jpg
  
Todd J. Teske, 56, has served as a director of our Company since 2011 and as Lead Director since May, 2015. He is the Chair of the Board Governance Committee and a member of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee.

Mr. Teske served as the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Briggs & Stratton Corporation, a world leader in gasoline engines for outdoor power equipment, portable generators, and lawn and garden powered equipment and related accessories from 2010 to 2020. Before becoming CEO of Briggs & Stratton, he served as its President and Chief Operating Officer, President of its power products business, head of corporate development and Controller. Briggs & Stratton filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in July 2020. In September of 2020 Briggs & Stratton was acquired and exited bankruptcy.

Mr. Teske serves as the Chairman of the Board of Briggs & Stratton. Mr. Teske served on the Board of Directors of Briggs & Stratton from 2010 to 2020 and Badger Meter, Inc., a leading innovator, manufacturer and marketer of flow measurement and control products from 2009 to 2020.

As a former CEO and corporate controller, Mr. Teske contributes extensive expertise in the areas of management, finance, accounting, manufacturing and corporate governance in his service as a director.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR”
THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE ABOVE NOMINEES
6

The following Class I directors’ terms will continue until the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders:
g329621g33r331.jpg
  
Janet K. Cooper, 67, has served as a director of our Company since 1999. She is a member of the Audit Committee and the Public Policy Committee. From 2002 to 2008, Ms. Cooper served as Senior Vice President and Treasurer of Qwest Communications International Inc. From 2001 to 2002, she served as Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of McDATA Corporation, a global leader in open storage networking solutions. From 2000 to 2001, she served as Senior Vice President, Finance of Qwest. From 1998 to 2000, she served in various senior level finance positions at US West Inc., a regional Bell operating company, including Vice President, Finance and Controller and Vice President and Treasurer. From 1978 to 1998, Ms. Cooper served in various capacities with the Quaker Oats Company, including Vice President, Treasurer and Tax from 1997 to 1998 and Vice President, Treasurer from 1992 to 1997.

Ms. Cooper serves on the Board of Directors of The Toro Company, a manufacturer of equipment for turf and landscape maintenance, snow and ice management, underground utility construction, rental and specialty construction. Ms. Cooper served on the Board of Directors of CPI Aerostructures, Inc. from 2019 to 2020 and Resonant Inc. from 2014 to 2019.

Ms. Cooper contributes a substantial financial background and extensive experience in capital markets, tax, accounting matters, and pension plan investments in her service as a director.

g329621g78c001.jpg
  
John W. Norris, III, 63, has served as a director of our Company since 2001. He is the Chair of the Public Policy Committee and a member of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee. Mr. Norris is a partner and co-founder of Maine Network Partners and is the founding Chairman of the Environmental Funders Network. From 2000 to 2005, he served as the Associate Director of Philanthropy for the Maine Chapter of The Nature Conservancy and from 2006 to 2007 as Program Officer for the Northern Forest Center. Mr. Norris was Co-Founder and President of Borealis, Inc., an outdoor products manufacturer, from 1988 to 2000 and served as an economic development Peace Corps Volunteer in Jamaica from 1985 to 1987. Before joining the Peace Corps, Mr. Norris completed a graduate school internship at Lennox Industries Inc., a subsidiary of the Company, in 1983.

Mr. Norris contributes substantial experience and knowledge on environmental issues, non-governmental organizations, and organizational development in his service as a director.
7

karenquintosphotohireshead.jpg
  
Karen H. Quintos, 57, has served as a director of our Company since 2014. She is a member of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee and the Public Policy Committee.
Ms. Quintos served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Customer Officer (CCO) of Dell Technologies Inc., a technology leader that provides essential infrastructure for organizations to build their digital future, transform IT and protect their most important information from 2016 to 2020. Ms. Quintos was also responsible for Dell’s strategy and programs for Diversity & Inclusion and Corporate Social Responsibility.
Previously at Dell, Ms. Quintos served as Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer from 2010 to 2016 and Vice President of Public Sector Marketing and North America Commercial from 2008 to 2010. She previously also held executive roles in services, support and supply chain management. Ms. Quintos joined Dell from Citigroup, where she was Vice President of Global Operations and Technology. She also held a variety of marketing, operations, planning and supply chain management roles at Merck & Co.
Ms. Quintos earned a master’s degree in marketing and international business from New York University, and a Bachelor of Science in supply chain management from Pennsylvania State University.
Ms. Quintos is on the board of directors of Cummins Inc., a global power technology leader, that designs, engineers, manufactures, distributes and services engines and related technologies. Ms. Quintos also served on the board of Susan G. Komen for the Cure, CASA of Travis County and serves on The Pennsylvania State University Smeal’s College of Business, where she was a 2014 recipient of the Smeal College of Business’ highest honor, the Distinguished Alumni Award.
Ms. Quintos contributes a broad knowledge of marketing, communications, brand strategy, operations and supply chain management in her service as a director.

8

The following Class III directors’ terms will continue until the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders:
bluedorn1.jpg
  
Todd M. Bluedorn, 58, became Chief Executive Officer and was elected as a director of our Company in April 2007. He was appointed as Chairman of the Board in May, 2012. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Bluedorn served in numerous senior management positions for United Technologies Corporation since 1995, including President, Americas — Otis Elevator Company; President, North America — Commercial Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning for Carrier Corporation; and President, Hamilton Sundstrand Industrial. He began his professional career with McKinsey & Company in 1992. A graduate of the United States Military Academy at West Point with a bachelor of science in electrical engineering, Mr. Bluedorn is Ranger qualified and served in the U.S. Army as a Combat Engineer officer from 1985 to 1990. He received his M.B.A. from Harvard University School of Business in 1992.

Mr. Bluedorn also serves on the Board of Directors of Texas Instruments Incorporated, a global designer and manufacturer of semiconductors and on the Board of Trustees of Washington University in St. Louis. Mr. Bluedorn served on the Board of Directors of Eaton Corporation, a diversified industrial manufacturer from 2010 to 2020.

Mr. Bluedorn possesses considerable industry knowledge and executive leadership experience. Mr. Bluedorn’s extensive knowledge of our Company and its business, combined with his drive for excellence and innovation, position him well to serve as CEO and a director of our Company.

mitchellpica021.jpg
  
Max H. Mitchell, 57, has served as a director of our Company since 2016. He is a member of the Audit Committee and the Board Governance Committee. Mr. Mitchell is the President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Crane Co., a diversified manufacturer of highly engineered industrial products. Before being elected President and Chief Executive Officer of Crane Co. in 2014, he served as the President and Chief Operating Officer of Crane Co. from 2013 to 2014, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Crane Co. from 2011 to 2013, and Group President, Fluid Handling segment of Crane Co. from 2005 to 2012. Mr. Mitchell also served as an executive of Pentair Corporation and Danaher Corporation and served in finance and operational roles at Ford Motor Company.
 
Mr. Mitchell has an M.B.A. in finance and strategic planning from the University of Pittsburgh and a B.A. from Tulane University.
 
Mr. Mitchell brings broad global experiences across a diverse set of complex end industries and processes including strategy development as well as significant M&A experience and capital allocation decision making.
9

photoruckerkim62016graybac.jpg
  
Kim K.W. Rucker, 54, has served as a director of our Company since 2015. She is the Chair of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee and a member of the Board Governance Committee. Ms. Rucker has served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary at Andeavor (formerly Tesoro Corporation) and Executive Vice President and General Counsel for Andeavor Logistics LP (formerly Tesoro Logistics GP, LLC) from 2016 to 2018. Previously, she was Executive Vice President, Corporate & Legal Affairs, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary at Kraft Foods Group, Inc., a global manufacturer and distributor of food products and beverages until July 2015. Prior to joining Kraft in 2012, Ms. Rucker served as the Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer at Avon Products, Inc., a global manufacturer of beauty and related products, since 2008. Before joining Avon, Ms. Rucker was Senior Vice President, Corporate Secretary and Chief Governance Officer for Energy Future Holdings, Corp., an energy company, since 2004. She began her legal career at Sidley Austin LLP in its Chicago, Illinois office.

Ms. Rucker currently serves on the Boards of Directors of Marathon Petroleum Corporation, a U.S. refining, marketing and midstream oil and gas company, and Celanese Corporation, a global technology leader in the production of differentiated chemistry solutions and specialty materials.

Ms. Rucker has a B.B.A. in Economics from the University of Iowa, a J.D. from Harvard Law School and a Master in Public Policy from the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University.

Ms. Rucker contributes a broad knowledge of law, corporate governance, internal and external communications, M&A transactions, community involvement activities and government affairs in her service as a director.

shanewall_4xbw1.jpg
  
Shane D. Wall, 55, has served as a director of our Company since July 2020.  He is a member of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee and the Board Governance Committee. He started his career at Hewlett-Packard Company in 1986 where he held various engineering and management roles until 1995, when he left to run PrintPaks, a spin-out of Hewlett-Packard Company. In 1998, PrintPaks was acquired by a joint venture backed by Intel Corporation. From 1998 to 2012, Mr. Wall held several senior technology and general management positions at Intel Corporation. In 2012, Mr. Wall rejoined Hewlett-Packard Company as Chief Technology Officer and Senior Vice President of Printing and Personal Systems. In 2015 following Hewlett-Packard’s separation into HP Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Enterprise, Mr. Wall became Chief Technology Officer and Global Head, HP Labs of HP Inc. In January 2020, Mr. Wall retired from his executive position at HP Inc. but continues as a special advisor to the Chief Executive Officer. He previously served as a member of the U.S. President’s Counsel of Advisors on Science and Technology.

Mr. Wall holds a bachelor’s degree in electrical and computer engineering from Oregon State University.

Mr. Wall contributes extensive technology and cybersecurity expertise and diverse business development and management experiences within large global companies in his services as a director.
10

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Director Independence
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that a majority of our directors be “independent,” and that the Compensation & Human Resources, Board Governance and Audit Committees consist exclusively of independent directors as defined under the NYSE listing standards, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and any other applicable laws or regulations regarding independence. No director qualifies as “independent” unless the Board affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with the Company.
Applying these standards, the Board has determined that all of our Board members are independent, except Todd Bluedorn, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), and that all of the members of the Board’s standing committees consist exclusively of independent directors (see table under “Board Committees”).
In making its determination as to the independence of our directors, the Board Governance Committee and the Board considered that (a) Ms. Quintos served as Chief Customer Officer of Dell, Inc., which provides computer equipment and related items to the Company in the ordinary course of business, (b) Mr. Major serves as member of the Board of Directors of Littelfuse Inc., which provides circuit protection devices to the Company and (c) Mr. Wall serves as a special advisor to the CEO of HP Inc., which provides computer equipment and related items to the Company in the ordinary course of business.
Board Meetings and Leadership Structure
Mr. Bluedorn serves as the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). The Board has determined that Mr. Bluedorn’s position as Chairman allows him to be a liaison between management and the Board of Directors, providing the Board with the benefit of management’s perspective on our business strategy and all other aspects of the business as the Board performs its oversight role.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide for a Lead Director position, and the Board elected Todd J. Teske as Lead Director in 2015. The Board believes the Lead Director position provides helpful guidance to the independent directors in their oversight of management. The Lead Director, among other things, presides at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors, serves as liaison between the Chairman and the independent directors, assists the Chairman in planning agendas for Board meetings and advises on the quality of the information provided to the Board. The Lead Director also has the authority to call meetings of the independent directors, and, if requested by major stockholders, is available for consultation and direct communication.
The Board met seven times in 2020. All directors attended more than 75% of the total number of all meetings of the Board and committees of the Board on which they served. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines include a policy that Board members are expected to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. All of the individuals serving as directors at the time of our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders attended our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Risk Oversight

While the Board oversees the Company’s risk management, our management is responsible for the development, implementation, and maintenance of our risk management processes. Management provides periodic reports to the Board and Board committees on its assessment of strategic, operational, legal and compliance, information security, and financial reporting risks to the Company. The Board and Board committees, as appropriate, review and consider the management reports provided on the Company’s enterprise risk and risk management strategy.

Enterprise Risk Management

Our Enterprise Risk Management program, which identifies and addresses risk, is presented to the full Board twice a year. The Audit Committee oversees the guidelines and policies that govern the Company’s processes to assess and manage significant enterprise risk exposure.

11

Compensation Risk

The Board reviews the Company’s compensation policies and practices to determine if risks arising from those policies and practices are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. All of the Company’s material incentive compensation plans are reviewed at least annually. Based on these reviews, the Board has not identified any risks arising from the compensation policies and practices that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. See “Executive Compensation-Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more information about out the design of our compensation program and risk mitigation compensation practices we have incorporated into our compensation program including stock ownership guidelines and clawback provisions.

Information Security Risk

On an ongoing basis, the Company analyzes and assesses information security risks associated with our business. That assessment is primarily the responsibility of the Company’s information technology department, with input from our Cybersecurity Steering Committee. The Company seeks to adhere to the NIST Cyber-Security Framework, which provides best practice guidance on how to prevent, detect and respond to cyberattacks. As part of the Company’s information security risk management program, the Company routinely tests our controls and information systems to help ensure we remain compliant with our security policies and procedures and industry standards, and requires that IT infrastructure associated with sensitive customer credit card information be audited and certified by a quality security party. We also provide information security training for our employees and business partners. In addition, the Company maintains information security risk insurance.

At least annually management updates the Board on the Company’s information security policies and procedures, including, training, risk assessment, internal controls, security software, evaluation and testing, insurance, incident response plans, and forward-looking information security strategies. Additionally, our policies require our Board to be notified of breaches to our information systems based on pre-defined severity thresholds.
Board Committees
The standing committees of the Board are as follows: Audit, Board Governance, Compensation and Human Resources, and Public Policy. The Board has adopted charters for each of these committees, copies of which are available on our website at www.lennoxinternational.com by following the links “About Us — Corporate Governance — Committee Charters.” Each of these Board committees is led by a different independent director and all members of our Board committees are independent directors.
The following table provides current membership information for each of the Board committees and indicates which directors our Board determined are independent, as defined by the NYSE. 
Name  Independent  Audit  Board Governance  Compensation and Human
Resources
  Public Policy
Todd M. Bluedorn          
Sherry L. BuckXX  X
Janet K. Cooper  X  X      X
John E. Major**  X    X   X  
Max H. Mitchell  X  X  X    
John W. Norris, III  X      X   X*
Karen H. Quintos  X      X  X
Kim K.W. Rucker  X    X   X*  
Gregory T. Swienton   X   X*  X    
Todd J. Teske  X     X*  X  
Shane D. WallXXX
*Committee Chair
**
Due to the Company’s mandatory age-based retirement provisions in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Mr. Major will retire immediately following the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
12

Audit Committee
The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to the integrity of our financial statements and related systems of internal controls, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, independence and performance and the performance of our internal audit function. The Audit Committee also has the direct responsibility for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of our Independent Accountants.
The Board has determined that each Audit Committee member is independent, as independence is defined for audit committee members by the SEC and the NYSE. The Board has also determined that each Audit Committee member is “financially literate” as defined by the NYSE, has accounting or related financial management expertise, and is an audit committee financial expert as defined by the SEC. The Audit Committee met nine times in 2020.
Board Governance Committee
The Board Governance Committee assists the Board by identifying individuals qualified to become Board members, developing qualification criteria for Board membership, making recommendations to the Board regarding the appropriate size of the Board and appointment of members to the Board’s committees, developing and recommending to the Board any changes to the Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct applicable to our Company, developing our Company’s director education programs, and overseeing the evaluation of our Board. The Board Governance Committee also conducts an individual peer review for any directors who are scheduled to be re-nominated. The Board has determined that each member of the Board Governance Committee is independent as independence is defined by the NYSE. The Board Governance Committee met three times in 2020.
Compensation and Human Resources Committee
The Compensation and Human Resources Committee determines the compensation philosophy and oversees the compensation programs for the Company’s executive officers and the non-employee members of the Board. This Committee’s responsibilities include oversight of the short- and long-term incentive plans and the senior management succession plans. The Committee also reviews the funding requirements and investment policies for the defined benefit and defined contribution retirement plans, and the performance of investment funds, investment advisors and investment managers under those plans. The Committee may delegate its responsibilities to a subcommittee comprised of Committee members.
Although the Committee seeks input from the CEO on various elements of executive compensation, the Committee determines and approves the final compensation elements and amounts to be provided to the Company’s NEOs. The independent members of the Board (rather than the Committee) have direct responsibility for approving CEO and Board compensation; however, the Committee reviews and recommends proposed changes to CEO and Board compensation to the independent members of the Board for approval. See “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for information concerning the committee’s philosophy and objectives in overseeing executive compensation. The Board has affirmatively determined that each member of the Committee is independent as defined for compensation committee members by the NYSE. The Board has also determined that each member of the Committee is a “non-employee director” for purposes of Section 16b-3 of the Exchange Act. The Committee met five times in 2020.
The Committee’s charter authorizes the Committee to retain third-party compensation consultants and to obtain advice and assistance from internal or external legal, accounting or other advisors. For 2020, the Committee retained Pearl Meyer. Pearl Meyer does not provide any other services to the Company. See “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for further information regarding our executive compensation programs and the scope of services provided by Pearl Meyer. The Committee has concluded that Pearl Meyer’s work does not raise any conflicts of interest that require disclosure under applicable SEC regulations.

Public Policy Committee
The Public Policy Committee is responsible for overseeing the Company’s (a) actions in furtherance of corporate environmental and social responsibilities and other sustainability issues of significance to investors and
13

other key Company stakeholders and (b) health and safety issues. The Board has determined that each Public Policy Committee member is independent as defined by the NYSE. The Public Policy Committee met twice in 2020.
Director Nomination Process and Nominee Criteria
The Board is responsible for nominating candidates for Board membership. The Board has delegated the director screening and recruitment process to the Board Governance Committee. In this capacity, the Board Governance Committee develops and periodically reviews the qualification criteria for Board membership, identifies new director candidates, and makes recommendations to the Board regarding the appropriate size of the Board and appointment of members to the Board’s committees. The Board Governance Committee typically retains a third-party search firm to assist in identifying and evaluating potential new director candidates. We strive to maintain a well-rounded Board with a diversity of experience, functional expertise and industry knowledge. Required qualifications for Board membership vary according to the particular areas of expertise, experience and skills being sought complement to the existing Board composition at the time of any vacancy.
According to our Board of Director Qualification Guidelines, the Board Governance Committee considers the following factors in evaluating candidates, in addition to other factors that the Board Governance Committee deems relevant:
Personal Characteristics: leadership, integrity, interpersonal skills and effectiveness, accountability, and high performance standards;
Business Attributes: high levels of leadership experience in business, substantial knowledge of issues faced by publicly-traded companies, experience in positions demonstrating expertise, including on other boards of directors, financial acumen, industry and Company knowledge, diversity of viewpoints, and experience in international markets and strategic planning;
Independence: independence based on the standards established by the NYSE, the SEC, and any other applicable laws or regulations;
Professional Responsibilities: willingness to commit the time required to fully discharge his or her responsibilities, commitment to attend meetings, ability and willingness to represent the stockholders’ long- and short-term interests, awareness of our responsibilities to our customers, employees, suppliers, regulatory bodies and the communities in which we operate and willingness to advance his or her opinions while supporting the majority Board decision, assuming questions of ethics or propriety are not involved;
Governance Responsibility: ability to understand, and distinguish between, the roles of governance and management; and
Availability and Commitment: availability based on the number of commitments to other entities existing or contemplated by the candidate.

Neither the Board nor the Board Governance Committee has a formal diversity policy. However, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that, when nominating new members to the Board, the Board will seek the best qualified candidates with consideration for diversity. Further, our Board of Director Qualification Guidelines provide that the Board Governance Committee consider a candidate’s diversity of viewpoints in determining the particular qualifications desired for any new Board member.

In addition, we believe that diversity with respect to tenure is important to benefit from both fresh perspectives and deep experience and knowledge of our Company and our business. Therefore, we aim to maintain an appropriate balance of tenure among our directors. In furtherance of its succession planning responsibility, the Board has appointed five new directors since 2014.



14

diversitytenure1.jpg

When a vacancy occurs on the Board, a majority of the directors then in office may fill the vacancy or the size of the Board may be reduced. The Board Governance Committee considers nominees for election to the Board recommended by stockholders in the same manner as other candidates.

The full text of our Board of Directors Qualification Guidelines can be found on our website at http://www.lennoxinternational.com by following the links “About Us — Corporate Governance — Board of Director Qualification Guidelines.”

Expertise, Experience and Skills of our Directors

Our directors bring a diversity of expertise, experience, and skills, and represent a mix of deep knowledge of the Company and fresh perspectives. The expertise, experience, and skills that the Board considers in evaluating its composition, and which inform Board succession planning and our director nomination processes, are highlighted in the following table. The table also identifies the number of directors who have particularly strong expertise, experience and skill in each area. Further information on each individual director, including some of their specific expertise, experience, and skills is set forth in the director biographies in this proxy statement.



expertise1.jpg

15

Stockholder Nominations for Director
A stockholder wishing to nominate a candidate for election to the Board at a meeting of the stockholders (“Nominating Stockholder”) is required to give written notice to our Corporate Secretary of his or her intention to make a nomination in accordance with the terms of our Bylaws. The Nominating Stockholder must be a holder of record of stock of the Company entitled to vote at the annual meeting of stockholders and must appear at the annual meeting of stockholders to nominate such person. The Nominating Stockholder must include a written consent from its proposed director nominee. The proposed director nominee must also represent and agree that he or she (1) has not and will not give any assurance or commitment not disclosed to the Company on how he or she would vote on any issue or question, (2) has not and will not become party to any agreement not disclosed to the Company regarding direct or indirect compensation (other than from the Company) for his or her service as a director, and (3) if elected, will comply with all applicable policies and guidelines of the Company. We must receive the notice of nomination at least 60 days but no more than 90 days prior to the annual meeting of stockholders. However, if we give less than 70 days’ notice of the date of the annual meeting of stockholders, the notice of nomination must be received within 10 days following the date on which notice of the date of the annual meeting of stockholders was mailed or such public disclosure was made to our stockholders.
Pursuant to our Bylaws, the notice for the proposed director nominee must contain certain information about the nominee, the Nominating Stockholder and any person “acting in concert” with the Nominating Stockholder, including descriptions of any arrangements or understanding related to the nomination, the information that would be required if such person was making a stockholder proposal (as described under “Stockholder Proposals for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders — Proposals Not for Inclusion in the Proxy Statement to be Offered at the 2021 Annual Meeting”) and other information sufficient to allow the Board Governance Committee to determine if the candidate meets our qualification criteria for Board membership. The Board Governance Committee may require the proposed director nominee to furnish additional information in order to determine that person’s eligibility to serve as a director. A nomination that does not comply with the above procedure will be disregarded. Nominating Stockholders whose nominations comply with the foregoing procedure and who meet the criteria described above under the heading “Director Nomination Process and Nominee Criteria,” and in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, will be evaluated by the Board Governance Committee in the same manner as the Board Governance Committee’s nominees.
Stockholder Communications with Directors
Stockholders may send written communications to the Board by email to directors@lennoxintl.com, or by regular mail to 2140 Lake Park Blvd., Richardson, Texas 75080, Attention: Board of Directors, c/o Corporate Secretary.
Stockholder communications received by the Corporate Secretary will be delivered to one or more members of the Board or management, as determined by the Corporate Secretary. Any allegations of accounting, internal controls or auditing-related complaints or concerns will be directed to the Chair of the Audit Committee.
Interested parties may communicate with non-management directors of the Board by sending written communications to the address listed above to the attention of the Lead Director.
Other Corporate Governance Policies and Practices
Code of Business Conduct
The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct that applies to all its directors and employees, including its senior financial and principal executive officers. The Code of Business Conduct covers a variety of matters, such as acting with integrity and compliance with laws, including anti-corruption laws. Amendments to and waivers, if any, of the Code of Business Conduct as it pertains to the executive officers will be disclosed on our website. The Code of Business Conduct is available on the Company’s website at www.lennoxinternational.com by following the links “About Us — Our Core Values — Code of Conduct.”

16

Corporate Governance Guidelines
The Company has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that are available on the Company’s website at www.lennoxinternational.com by following the links “About Us — Corporate Governance — Corporate Governance Guidelines.”
Executive Session Meetings
In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the non-management directors of our Board, all of whom are independent, meet regularly in executive session without the presence of management. The Lead Director chairs the executive session meetings of our independent directors.
Whistleblower Procedures
The Audit Committee has established procedures for the handling of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters, including procedures for confidential and anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding such matters. The Company’s Code of Business Conduct prohibits retaliation against employees who report violations or suspected violations of the Code of Business Conduct.

17

PROPOSAL 2

ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are asking our stockholders to vote to approve the compensation of our Company’s NEOs (the “Say-on-Pay vote”), as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. The Say-on-Pay vote is an advisory vote on the resolution below and is not binding. Although the vote is non-binding, the directors value stockholders’ opinions and will consider the voting results of this proposal when making future compensation decisions. Say-on-Pay advisory votes are currently conducted annually. Our next advisory vote on the frequency of Say-on-Pay votes will take place at our annual meeting of stockholders in 2023.
As described more fully in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement, the Company designed its market-competitive NEO compensation program to reward successful execution of its business strategy and achievement of desired business results, with a focus on creating alignment with the interests of our stockholders. The program seeks to achieve these goals on both an annual and long-term basis through an appropriate combination of base pay, annual incentives and long-term incentives.
For our NEOs, the majority of compensation is both stock-based and contingent on performance. The annual incentive payout is based on Company financial performance metrics of core net income and free cash flow, and for NEOs that are business segment leaders, a combination of Company and business segment performance. Our long-term incentives currently include: (1) performance share units, which are designed to link compensation to the Company’s three-year financial performance as measured by return on invested capital and core net income growth; (2) stock appreciation rights, which are designed to incentivize NEOs to grow our business and deliver increased returns to our stockholders and (3) restricted stock units, which are designed to support our retention efforts.
The Company also has several governance policies in place to align executive compensation with stockholder interests and mitigate risk. These policies include: stock ownership guidelines; a prohibition on hedging and pledging of Company stock; a clawback policy; and post-employment non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions. These policies are discussed in detail in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement.
The Company had a strong year, led by our Residential business, in the face of uncertainty and unprecedented challenges created by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Company implemented cost control measures in the second quarter to address the changing environment while focusing on the health and safety of our employees and the needs of our customers. Following the onset of the pandemic in the first half of the year, end markets and company performance began to recover in the second half of the year. Results of our 2020 performance include the following:
While full year revenue(1) declined over prior year by 3.7% due to the impact of the pandemic on our end markets, through aggressive cost containment actions and margin expansion initiatives adjusted total segment profit(2) declined by only 0.8%. Company performance in the second half of the year showed strong improvement, resulting in record fourth quarter revenue and record fourth quarter total segment profit;
The Company tightly managed and reduced working capital in the face of challenging market conditions resulting in record free cash flow(3) generation of $535 million;
One-year total stockholder return of 14%, three-year total stockholder return of 36% and five-year total stockholder return of 133%; and
Quarterly dividends resulted in approximately $118 million cash paid to stockholders. The Company used an additional $100 million to purchase shares under our stock repurchase programs. Following the onset of the pandemic, the Company placed our stock repurchase plan on hold for the balance of 2020.

(1) 2019 Revenue excludes the Company’s Kysor Warren business operations divested in 2019. See GAAP reconciliation in Appendix A.
18

(2) 2019 Adjusted Total Segment Profit excludes the Company’s Kysor Warren business operations divested in 2019 and $99 million of insurance proceeds. See GAAP reconciliation in Appendix A.
(3) See GAAP reconciliation in Appendix A.
Financial results, including those from prior periods, are described in more detail in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. For further detail and a reconciliation of Segment Profit to Operating Income, see Note 3 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. All total stockholder return calculations assume reinvestment of dividends.

We are asking stockholders to approve the following advisory resolution at the Annual Meeting:
RESOLVED, that the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion is hereby APPROVED.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE
COMPENSATION OF THE NEOS AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.


19

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) reviews the philosophy, objectives, and elements of our executive compensation program, and discusses the 2020 compensation earned by our named executive officers (“NEOs”). It also describes the process followed by the Compensation and Human Resource Committee (the “Committee”) for making pay decisions, as well as its rationale for specific pay decisions related to 2020 executive compensation. In 2020, our NEOs consisted of the following individuals:
 NEO Title
Todd M. BluedornChairman and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)
Joseph W. ReitmeierExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”)
Douglas L. YoungExecutive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Residential Heating & Cooling
Daniel M. SessaExecutive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer
John D. TorresExecutive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary
Executive Summary
The Company’s executive compensation program is designed to attract, retain and motivate leadership talent, align with short- and long-term business goals, maintain market competitiveness and drive increased stockholder value by maintaining a strong alignment between pay and performance. Highlights of our 2020 financial performance and a description of the linkage between executive compensation and financial performance are set forth below.
Financial Highlights
The Company had a strong year, led by our Residential business, in the face of uncertainty and unprecedented challenges created by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Company implemented cost control measures in the second quarter to address the changing environment while focusing on the health and safety of our employees and the needs of our customers. Following the onset of the pandemic in the first half of the year, end markets and company performance began to recover in the second half of the year. Results of our 2020 performance include the following:
While full year revenue declined over the prior year due to the impact of the pandemic on our end markets, through aggressive cost containment actions and margin expansion initiatives adjusted total segment profit remained relatively flat. Company performance in the second half of the year showed strong improvement, resulting in record fourth quarter revenue and record fourth quarter total segment profit.
revenuev21.jpg adjustedsegmentprofit1.jpg
(1) 2019 Revenue excludes the Company’s Kysor Warren business operations divested in 2019. See GAAP reconciliation in Appendix A.

(2) 2019 Adjusted Total Segment Profit excludes the Company’s Kysor Warren business operations divested in 2019 and $99 million of insurance proceeds received. See GAAP reconciliation in
Appendix A.

20

The Company tightly managed and reduced working capital in the face of challenging market conditions resulting in record free cash flow generation of $535 million.
fcfv21.jpg
1) See GAAP reconciliation in Appendix A.
One-year total stockholder return of 14%, three-year total stockholder return of 36% and five-year total stockholder return of 133%; and
Quarterly dividends resulted in approximately $118 million cash paid to stockholders and used an additional $100 million to purchase shares under our stock repurchase programs. Following the onset of the pandemic, the Company placed our stock repurchase plan on hold for the balance of the year.
Financial results, including those from prior periods, are described in more detail in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, which was filed with the SEC on February 16, 2021 (“Form 10-K”). For further detail and a reconciliation of segment profit to operating income, see Note 3 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Form 10-K. All total stockholder return calculations assume reinvestment of dividends.
2020 Compensation Actions Related to COVID-19
In 2020 our NEOs showed exceptional performance in both managing the Company in the face of unprecedented challenges from the COVID-19 pandemic and driving business results. The Company implemented cost control measures in the second quarter of 2020 to conserve cash, maintain liquidity, and reduce operating expenses.
What we did in 2020 due to COVID-19:
Canceled annual base salary merit increases for salaried employees, including NEOs, which would have been effective April 1, 2020. Because business conditions improved, the Company repaid this base salary amount in 2021 in the form of a one-time lump-sum at a flat 3% rate.
Implemented a temporary salary reduction, effective May 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020. CEO base salary and Board of Director retainers were reduced 50% and base salary for our NEOs and all other executives were reduced 12%. As business conditions improved throughout the year, these reductions were repaid to employees and the Board of Directors.
What we did not do in 2020 due to COVID-19:
The Company did not adjust any goals for the annual short-term incentive program or outstanding long-term incentive performance awards.
The Company did not use discretion to override formulaic outcomes on short or long-term incentive payouts to NEOs.
The Company did not make off-cycle retention awards to NEOs.

21

2020 Compensation Highlights
The Committee believes that the design of the Company’s executive compensation program provides a direct link between Company performance and the compensation to our NEOs. Our executive compensation program has three primary elements: base salary, short-term incentives (as part of our Short-Term Incentive (“STI”) Program), and long-term equity incentives (as part of our Long-Term Incentive (“LTI”) Program). Each of these compensation elements serves a specific purpose in our compensation strategy. Base salary is an essential component to any market-competitive executive compensation program. Short-term incentives reward the achievement of annual goals, while long-term incentives drive our NEOs to focus on stockholder value creation.

    Based on our performance and consistent with the design of our program, the Committee made the following payout decisions for 2020:

Base salaries: NEOs’ base salary increases were canceled due to the pandemic. Because business conditions improved, the Company repaid this base salary amount in 2021 in the form of a one-time lump-sum at a flat 3% rate.
STI Program: STI amounts are determined by Company performance against the earnings and cash flow goals, as approved by the Committee. Once this achievement is determined, 25% of that amount may be modified from 0% to 225% based on each NEO’s individual performance. When determining whether to modify an NEO’s calculated STI amount the Committee considered each NEO’s performance against specific financial, operational, and strategic objectives, as well as each NEO’s contribution to our environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) goals. The Company’s ESG goals include reducing the environmental impact of our products and operations, reducing the number of safety incidents in our operations, and enhancing the diversity and inclusiveness of our workforce. For more information on the Company’s ESG performance, view our ESG Report at www.lennoxinternational.com.
For 2020, the Company’s performance exceeded target award levels, resulting in a weighted average payout of 146% for NEOs. Performance goals were not adjusted due to the COVID-19 pandemic and no discretionary payments were made to NEOs.
LTI Program: NEOs receive 50% of their annual LTI grant in the form of performance-based restricted stock units (“PSUs”), which vest after three years. In 2020 the NEOs earned 100% of their target PSUs for the December 2017 PSU grant. Payouts under our PSU program averaged 130% of target over the last three completed performance cycles (the 2016-2018, 2017-2019 and 2018-2020 PSU grants), while total stockholder return over that same five-year period was 133%.

    The Committee believes payouts for 2020 demonstrate the alignment with the Company’s business performance for the year.
    Stockholder Input
The Committee considers input from stockholders, including the result of the annual Say-on-Pay vote, in determining compensation policies and decisions. At our 2020 Annual Meeting, the advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s NEOs received the approval of over 97% of the stockholders voting for or against this proposal. In an effort to maintain this strong support from stockholders, management has continued to review investor and proxy advisor concerns regarding executive compensation and governance and has engaged in dialogues with stockholders. The Say-on-Pay vote result was one of many factors the Committee considered in deciding to not implement any major changes to the executive compensation program in 2020.
Positive Governance Practices
The Committee assesses trends and developments in executive compensation practices and implements those that best fit with the Company’s business strategy and our stockholders’ long-term interests. Below are some of the practices we have incorporated into our compensation program, as described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement:      
                            
22

What We Do
What We Don’t Do
þMedian compensation philosophyýNo tax gross-ups included in any CIC agreements after 2009
þPay-for-performance linkageýNo hedging of Company stock
þLong-term balance in compensation structureýNo pledging of Company stock
þUse of independent compensation consultantýNo dividends on equity awards in annual grant
þAnnual risk assessmentýNo repricing of stock appreciation rights or options
þRigorous stock ownership guidelinesýNo cash buyouts of underwater stock appreciation rights or options
þClawback provisionsýNo significant perquisites
þNon-Competition / Non-Solicitation restrictions
þAnnual reviews of share utilization
þRegular market assessment of our peer group
What Guides Our Program
Pay-for-Performance
We maintain a pay-for-performance philosophy designed to reward successful execution of our business strategy and achievement of desired business results, with a focus on aligning compensation with stockholders’ interests. When our financial results exceed performance goals, monetary rewards to our NEOs generally pay out at higher levels. When our financial results fall below performance goals, monetary awards to our NEOs generally pay out at lower levels and may not pay out at all.
Recent payouts under our STI and LTI Programs demonstrate the strong link between Company performance and payments made to our NEOs. In 2020, the Company’s profitability performance and record free cash flow resulted in above target level payouts under our annual STI program. Under our LTI Program, record weighted average return on invested capital of 35.9% exceeded the maximum payout goal for that metric, while the core net income compound annual growth rate fell below threshold achievement. As a result, our NEOs received a target performance share unit payout under our LTI plan, consistent with our pay-for-performance approach and results-oriented compensation.
The graph below illustrates the directional alignment of pay and performance by showing changes in CEO annual compensation (using totals from the Summary Compensation Table, excluding changes in pension value) versus changes in total stockholder return (“TSR”) over the last several years.



23

ceopayvstsr5year1.jpg



In addition, long-term compensation for the CEO reflects a strong relative pay-for-performance alignment versus the Compensation Peer Group across various metrics for 2017 - 2019, as shown in the table below.
a3yearpfpvspeersv21.jpg
CEO pay excludes changes in pension value.

24

Key Strategic Objectives
The strategic objectives of our executive compensation program are to:
attract, retain and motivate top executive talent;
align compensation with the achievement of short-term and long-term business goals;
maintain a market-competitive executive compensation program; and
drive increased stockholder value by maintaining a strong alignment between pay and performance.

    The following table lists each element of executive compensation and how the Committee believes it correlates to our compensation philosophy and key objectives.
 
Executive Compensation Elements Attract
Top
Talent
 Retain &
Motivate
Top
Talent
 Achieve
Short-
Term
Goals
 Achieve
Long-
Term
Goals
 Maintain
Market
Competitiveness
 Pay for
Performance
Base Salary ü ü   ü 
Short-Term Incentive Program ü ü ü  ü ü
Long-Term Incentive Program:      
Performance Share Units ü ü  ü ü ü
Restricted Stock Units ü ü   ü 
Stock Appreciation Rights ü ü ü ü ü ü
Perquisites ü    ü 
Benefit Programs ü    ü 

Pay Positioning and Compensation Mix
For 2020, the Committee targeted all elements of compensation for the Company’s NEOs at the 50th percentile of the market and granted a majority of the NEOs’ total compensation in the form of incentive compensation. The 2020 target compensation mix for the CEO and the average target compensation mix for the other NEOs are shown in the graphs below.
CEO - Target Compensation MixOther NEOs - Target Compensation Mix
ceodonut2down51.jpg
 otherneodonut2down51.jpg
Consistent with market practice, the CEO’s target compensation mix has more “at-risk” performance-based incentive compensation than the other NEOs due to his broad influence on Company performance.

25


The Decision-Making Process
Role of the Compensation and Human Resource Committee
The Committee establishes and administers our executive compensation program, practices and policies. The Committee receives input from management and its independent compensation consultant, and considers competitive practices, our business objectives, stockholder interests, regulatory requirements and other relevant factors to develop our executive compensation program in an effort to most effectively drive the achievement of the Company’s business objectives.
Role of Senior Management
The Committee obtains input from management and the Committee’s independent consultant when making NEO compensation decisions. The CEO makes recommendations to the Committee with respect to all elements of compensation for each NEO, excluding himself. The CEO’s recommendations on NEO pay are developed in consultation with the Chief Human Resources Officer and the Committee’s independent compensation consultant, and are considered with market data. The Committee determines and approves the final compensation elements and amounts to be provided to the NEOs.
The Committee reviews and recommends proposed changes to CEO compensation to the independent members of the Board for approval. All independent members of the Board (rather than the Committee) have responsibility for approving CEO compensation.
Role of the Independent Compensation Consultant
In 2020, the Committee engaged Pearl Meyer to provide analysis, advice and recommendations on executive compensation to the Committee. At the Committee’s request, Pearl Meyer performed the following services in 2020:
provided and analyzed data for all elements of CEO compensation;
reviewed and opined on our executive compensation philosophy;
reviewed and opined on our Compensation Peer Group;
provided and analyzed data for various elements of executive compensation;
reviewed and opined on our executive and Board compensation programs, including NEO and Board target compensation;
presented executive compensation trends and regulatory updates to the Committee; and
provided input and perspective on various technical matters pertaining to executive compensation.
The Committee analyzed and considered the information provided by management and its consultants to determine the program design and the level and mix of each compensation element for the NEOs. The Committee conducted an independence assessment of Pearl Meyer in accordance with SEC rules. Based on this review, we are not aware of any conflict of interest raised by the work performed by the consultant that would prevent them from serving as independent consultants to the Committee. Pearl Meyer reported directly to the Committee and did not provide any additional services to management.
Market Competitive Compensation
To maintain a market-competitive program, the Committee uses benchmarking data when establishing executive compensation. Benchmarking against a representative peer group assists the Committee in assessing the competitiveness of our executive compensation program.

26

For the purposes of setting 2020 compensation, our Company’s compensation peer group, as reviewed and approved by the Committee, included the following 15 companies (the “Compensation Peer Group”):
•    A. O. Smith Corporation•    Fortune Brands Home & Security, Inc.•    Pentair, Inc.
•    Acuity Brands, Inc.•    Hubbell Inc.•    Regal Beloit Corporation
•    Crane Company•    IDEX Corporation•    Rockwell Automation, Inc.
•    Dover Corporation•    Kennametal Inc.•    Snap-On Incorporated
•    Flowserve Corporation•    Owens Corning•    The Timken Company
The Committee selected the Compensation Peer Group using the following criteria:
industry — building products, electrical components/equipment and industrial machinery;
revenues of approximately 0.5 to 2.0 times our revenues;
business and product mix similar to ours; and
international presence and operations.

    In addition to comparing our NEO compensation to the compensation of our Compensation Peer Group, the Committee also references published compensation data and other studies of compensation trends and market practices (this data and practices, including our Compensation Peer Group, is collectively referred to as the “Market”).
Beyond traditional market analysis, the Committee also utilizes various other compensation analyses to assist with its decision-making process. Below are examples of information the Committee reviews and considers, as appropriate, when making compensation decisions:
“all in” compensation summaries and pay histories for the CEO and executive officers;
CEO realized pay analysis;
CEO pay vs. performance analysis;
dilution and share utilization analysis, projections and benchmarking;
equity compensation expense analysis;
short-term and long-term incentive design, metric and award type; and
short-term and long-term incentive plan performance results.
Components and Analysis of 2020 Executive Compensation
Base Salary
In establishing each NEO’s annual base salary, the Committee considered market data, each individual’s experience and responsibilities, our annual merit budget for all employees, achievement of performance objectives, internal equity and recommendations provided by the CEO for his direct reports. For 2020, annual merit increases that were to be effective April 1, 2020 were canceled due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Because business conditions improved, the Company repaid this base salary amount in 2021 in the form of a one-time lump-sum at a flat 3% rate.

27

The following table provides detail regarding base salaries for each NEO:
NameBase Salary January 1, 20203% Merit Lump Sum PaymentTotal Base Salary earned in 2020
Todd M. Bluedorn$1,195,000 $35,850 $1,230,850 
Joseph W. Reitmeier545,000 16,350 561,350 
Douglas L. Young600,000 18,000 618,000 
Daniel M. Sessa525,000 15,750 540,750 
John D. Torres510,000 15,300 525,300 
In setting NEO base salaries, the Committee used the 50th percentile of the market as a guideline. The base salary was set within a reasonable range of this guideline for each NEO.
Short-Term Incentive Program
Our STI program as established under the Lennox International Inc. 2019 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan, is an annual cash-based program for our NEOs designed to reward the successful performance of our Company, our business segments and each individual NEO. In February 2020, the Committee approved financial metrics and performance goals required to be achieved for any payouts to be made under our STI Program. Notwithstanding the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company did not adjust any of the STI Program’s financial metrics or performance goals. Under the STI Program, once the calculated STI amount is determined based on performance against the pre-approved goals, 25% of that amount may be modified up or down from 0% to 225% based on each NEO’s individual performance. However, the individual performance modifier may not increase the STI payout above 225% of the NEO’s STI target.
stiplanv21.jpg

Financial PerformanceThe following table summarizes the 2020 STI Program performance goals and payout opportunities, along with Company and business segment performance for each metric as approved by the Committee.
2020 Short-Term Incentive Program Summary — Financial Performance
($ in thousands) 
Name(1)MetricWeightThresholdTargetMaximumPerformance
AllCompany Core Net Income(2)60%$352,975 $441,219 $507,402 $399,300 
Company Free Cash Flow(3)40%287,000 410,000 533,000 534,900 
Payout Opportunity as a % of Target
50%100%225%
Douglas L. YoungSegment Profit(4)70%$389,703 $464,602 $520,777 $450,900 
Segment Controllable Cash Flow(5)30%318,498 410,700 502,902 499,200 
Payout Opportunity as a % of Target
50%100%225%
28

 
(1)All NEOs except Mr. Young were measured 100% on overall Company financial performance, which resulted in a calculated award of 136% of target. As the President of our Residential Heating and Cooling segment, Mr. Young’s award was measured 50% on Residential Heating and Cooling’s financial performance and 50% on overall Company financial performance. Residential Heating and Cooling’s financial performance resulted in a calculated award of 130% of target, which when blended with the Company’s calculated award of 136% of target, resulted in an aggregate calculated award of 133% of target for Mr. Young.
(2)Company core net income, a non-GAAP financial measure, is income from continuing operations, adjusted for 2020 restructuring charges, certain product quality adjustments, certain legal charges and contingency adjustments, unrealized gains and losses on unsettled futures contracts, and certain other items. For STI purposes, results were adjusted for lost profits due to a natural disaster at a large manufacturing facility in 2020 and certain COVID-19 related expenses.
(3)Company free cash flow, a non-GAAP financial measure, is net cash provided by operating activities less purchases of property, plant, and equipment plus proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment.
(4)Segment profit, a non-GAAP financial measure, is earnings from continuing operations for the applicable segment before interest expense, other expenses, and income taxes, adjusted for 2020 restructuring charges, certain product quality adjustments, certain legal charges and contingency adjustments, unrealized gains and losses on unsettled futures contracts and certain other items. For STI purposes, results were adjusted for lost profits due to a natural disaster at a large manufacturing facility in 2020, certain COVID-19 related expenses and certain other items.
(5)Segment controllable cash flow, a non-GAAP financial measure is segment profit, defined above, less purchases of property, plant, and equipment plus proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment, plus or minus changes in accounts receivable, inventory and accounts payable. For STI purposes, results were adjusted for lost profits due to a natural disaster at a large manufacturing facility in 2020, certain COVID-19 related expenses and certain other items.

Individual Performance Once the calculated STI amount is determined based on performance against the pre-approved earnings and cash flow goals, 25% of that amount may be modified up or down from 0% to 225% based on each NEO’s individual performance. When determining whether to modify an NEO’s calculated STI amount the Committee considered each NEO’s performance against specific financial, operational, and strategic objectives, as well as each NEO’s contribution to our environmental, social, and governance (ESG) goals. The Company’s ESG goals include reducing the environmental impact of our products and operations, reducing the number of safety incidents in our operations, and enhancing the diversity and inclusiveness of our workforce. The CEO reviewed with the Committee the individual performance of each NEO (other than the CEO).

Based on strong leadership from the NEOs in the face of the pandemic and their respective individual performance, the Committee approved increases to the STI payouts for Mr. Reitmeier, Mr. Sessa and Mr. Torres from 136% to 145%, and for Mr. Young from 133% to 150%. Based on Mr. Bluedorn’s leadership in the face of the pandemic and the Company’s overall operational and financial performance, the independent members of the Board approved an increase to Mr. Bluedorn’s STI payout from 136% to 145%.
Targets and Payouts. Under the STI Program, target payout opportunities are determined as a percentage of base salary. The target payout opportunities are based on market data using the 50th percentile as a guideline. Each NEO’s target percentage fits within this guideline and was unchanged for 2020.
Based on analysis of the market data and internal equity considerations, the Committee (or with respect to the CEO, the independent Board members) set the following STI targets for 2020. Based on financial and individual performance, the Committee (or with respect to the CEO, the independent Board members) approved the following 2020 payouts for each NEO:

29

2020 Short-Term Incentive Targets and Payouts 
Name2020 STI Target as a
% of Base Salary
2020 STI Target2020 STI Payout as a
% of Target
2020 STI Payout
Todd M. Bluedorn125 %$1,493,750 145 %$2,165,000 
Joseph W. Reitmeier70 381,500 145 553,000 
Douglas L. Young70 420,000 150 630,000 
Daniel M. Sessa70 367,500 145 532,000 
John D. Torres70 357,000 145 517,000 
We include the short-term incentive payments made to the NEOs for 2020, which were approved by the Committee on February 26, 2021 and paid on March 15, 2021, in the Summary Compensation Table under “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.”

Long-Term Incentive Program
We have a LTI Program designed to incentivize those employees who have principal responsibility for our long-term profitability. We believe participation in our LTI Program aligns the interests of our NEOs with the interests of our stockholders.
We use a mix of performance share units (“PSUs”), restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) in our LTI Program. PSUs and SARs reward performance, as measured by achievement of specified financial objectives for PSUs and stock price growth for SARs. RSUs help us retain key members of management through time-based vesting. The Committee allocated the mix of elements in our LTI Program in a manner designed to drive Company performance, retain key talent, and provide competitive compensation.
For 2020, the long-term incentive award allocations for our NEOs were as follows:
ltipie1.jpg
The Committee determines the grant date for all long-term incentive awards, and has a long-standing practice of granting all awards at its regularly scheduled December meeting. Although awards may also be granted in special circumstances or upon hire or promotion for certain executives, no out-of-cycle grants were made to any NEO in 2020. The Committee sets the exercise price of our SARs at 100% of fair market value, which is defined as the average of the high and low New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) trading prices of our common stock on the date of grant.
The target award values under our LTI are based on market data for similar positions using the 50th percentile as a guideline. The number of shares available for grant under the 2019 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan is also considered. In December 2020, the Committee established the target award values at or near the 50th percentile of the market for all NEOs. When determining the award sizes for each NEO, the
30

Committee and independent Board members considered the NEO’s time in position, individual performance and potential, the NEO’s impact on the financial performance of the Company, and internal equity.
Once the Committee determined the target long-term incentive award values for each NEO for the 2020 grants, 50% of the value was provided as PSUs, 30% as RSUs and 20% as SARs.

The following table summarizes the target award values and number of awards granted for each NEO: 
 December 2020 Award ValueNumber of Awards Granted
NamePSUsRSUsSARsTotalPSUs(1)RSUs(1)SARs(2)Total
Todd M. Bluedorn$2,800,000 $1,680,000 $1,120,000 $5,600,000 9,504 5,702 17,781 32,987 
Joseph W. Reitmeier525,000 315,000 210,000 1,050,000 1,782 1,069 3,334 6,185 
Douglas L. Young625,000 375,000 250,000 1,250,000 2,121 1,273 3,969 7,363 
Daniel M. Sessa525,000 315,000 210,000 1,050,000 1,782 1,069 3,334 6,185 
John D. Torres525,000 315,000 210,000 1,050,000 1,782 1,069 3,334 6,185 
 
(1)The number of PSUs and RSUs was determined by dividing the corresponding target award value by the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE averaged over the 30 calendar days ending on December 2, 2020 ($294.615).
(2)The number of SARs granted was determined by dividing the corresponding target award value by the Black-Scholes value of our common stock based on the 30 calendar day average closing price of our common stock as of December 2, 2020 ($62.99).

PSUs. To maintain our strong focus on long-term Company performance, we granted 50% of the December 2020 long-term incentive award in the form of PSUs. PSUs generally vest at the end of a three-year performance period. If at least the threshold performance level has been achieved at the end of the performance period, the PSUs are distributed in the form of Company common stock based on the performance achieved. Dividends are not earned or paid on PSU awards during the three-year performance period. The Committee determines the measurement criteria annually, selecting financial metrics and setting performance goals that will enhance stockholder value. The Committee certifies the financial performance levels following the end of the performance period and the Company distributes any earned shares.

December 2020 PSU Grant. The key attributes of the PSUs granted in December 2020 are summarized in the following table. The Committee established the Return on Invested Capital (“ROIC”) performance goals based on its assessment of desired return relative to the cost of capital as well as historical and projected ROIC outcomes. Similarly, the Committee set Company core net income growth performance goals based on historical results, projected outcomes of that measure, and expected market conditions. While specific forward-looking performance goals are not included in the table below in light of competitive sensitivities, the following chart broadly describes the performance required to achieve a target payout.
December 2020 PSU Grant
(for the January 1, 2021 — December 31, 2023 Performance Period) 
MetricWeightRationale for
Selection
Measurement PeriodThresholdTargetMaximum
ROIC50%Measures efficient use of capital; higher ROIC correlates to greater cash flow3-year weighted average (20% lowest year, 40% other two years)No payout occurs unless ROIC exceeds the Company’s estimated cost of capital; Target payout occurs at roughly three times the Company’s estimated cost of capital
Company Core Net Income Growth50%Measures profitability; higher Company core net income correlates with higher earnings per share3-year compound annual growth rateTarget payout requires low double digit core net income compound annual growth rate
Payout as a % of Target Award50%100%200%
31

The PSUs granted to our NEOs in 2020 are included in the 2020 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table in the “Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards” column.

December 2017 PSU Grant. The key attributes of the PSUs granted in December 2017, which vested on December 31, 2020, are summarized in the following table along with the financial performance goals and payout opportunities versus performance. In 2020, NEOs earned a payout of 100.0% of target for the PSUs granted in December 2017. The Company did not adjust any long-term incentive goals due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The payout value is reflected in the 2020 Option/SAR Exercises and Stock Vested Table in the “Stock Awards - Value Realized on Vesting” column.
December 2017 PSU Grant
(for the January 1, 2018 — December 31, 2020 Performance Period) 
MetricWeightMeasurement PeriodThresholdTargetMaximumPerformance
ROIC(1)50%3-year weighted average (20% lowest year, 40% other two years)15%25%35%35.9%
Company Core Net Income50%3-year compound annual growth rate6%12%20%(1.3)%
Payout as a % of Target Award50%100%200%100.0%
 
(1) Net operating profit after tax, a component of ROIC and a non-GAAP financial measure used for incentive compensation purposes, is income from continuing operations, adjusted for 2020 restructuring charges, certain product quality adjustments, certain legal charges and contingency adjustments, unrealized gains and losses on unsettled futures contracts, pension settlement charges and certain other items.
RSUs. To support our leadership retention objectives, the Committee granted the NEOs 30% of the December 2020 long-term incentive award in the form of RSUs. RSUs generally vest and are distributed in shares of Company common stock three years following the date of grant if the recipient remains an employee of the Company and all other conditions of the award are met. Dividends are not earned or paid on RSUs during the three-year vesting period. The number of shares underlying RSUs granted to our NEOs in 2020 is included in the 2020 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table in the “All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units” column.
SARs. To incentivize NEOs to grow our business and deliver increased returns to our stockholders, the Committee granted the NEOs 20% of the December 2020 LTI award in the form of SARs. SARs vest in one-third increments on each anniversary of the date of grant. Upon the exercise of vested SARs, the increase between the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant and the fair market value on the date of the SAR exercise is paid in Company common stock. The grant date fair value and the SAR exercise price is determined on the date of grant. SARs granted in 2020 expire seven years from the date of grant. The number of SARs granted to our NEOs in 2020 is included in the 2020 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table in the “All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options” column.
Other Compensation Practices, Policies and Programs
Stock Ownership Guidelines
The Company has stock ownership guidelines for the CEO and other NEOs. We believe stock ownership by executives aligns the interests of executives with the interests of our stockholders and motivates executives to build long-term stockholder value.
The following chart sets forth, as of December 31, 2020, for each NEO, the stock ownership requirements as a multiple of base salary, the total number of shares and unvested RSUs counted toward the stock ownership requirements, and the value of the shares and unvested RSUs as a multiple of base salary. All of our NEOs met our stock ownership guidelines as of December 31, 2020. NEOs are given five years from the date of appointment as an NEO to meet the guidelines. 
32

NameOwnership
Requirement as a Multiple of
Base Salary
Total Number of
Shares and
Unvested RSUs
Stock Ownership as Multiple
of Base Salary(1)
Todd M. Bluedorn5X83,17617.1X
Joseph W. Reitmeier3X21,0209.5X
Douglas L. Young3X65,22426.8X
Daniel M. Sessa3X44,57120.9X
John D. Torres3X7,5553.6X
 
(1)Based on the average daily closing price for 2020 of $246.31.

The Committee oversees and administers the stock ownership guidelines. If an NEO fails to comply with the guidelines, the Committee will determine any appropriate corrective measures to be taken.
Clawback Policy
Our Company has an incentive compensation clawback policy for the CEO and the other NEOs. Under this policy, in the event of any fraud or misconduct that results in a restatement of our Company’s financial results within three years of the filing of the original financial results, the Committee can recoup and cancel cash and equity-based incentive compensation of each person involved in such fraud or misconduct.
Prohibition on Hedging / Pledging Policy
The Company’s Insider Trading Policy prohibits directors, NEOs, all other employees, and each of their designees from trading in any interest, security or position relating to the future price of Company securities, such as a put, call, swap, short sale, hedge or any other type of derivative security. It also prohibits directors, NEOs and all other employees from pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan, which would include purchases of Company securities on margin.
Benefit Programs
To attract top executive talent and as a market-competitive practice, we provide certain benefit programs to our NEOs that are in addition to those provided to our employees generally. The following table summarizes the additional benefit programs in place during 2020 and the purpose of each program.

Additional Benefit Programs Offered to NEOs in 2020
Plan Type Purpose
Supplemental Retirement Plan Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Provide market-competitive retirement benefit by providing higher accruals and by permitting accruals that otherwise could not occur because of limitations on compensation under federal tax rules.
Life Insurance Plan Company-Sponsored Life Insurance Provide market-competitive life insurance benefits; $3 million in coverage for our CEO and minimum of $1 million for other NEOs.
In 2018, the Committee closed the defined benefit Supplemental Retirement Plan to new participants and approved a defined contribution restoration plan for individuals who become eligible executive officers on or after January 1, 2019.  The Committee made these changes to better align the Company’s non-qualified retirement benefit with current market practices.
Perquisites
We believe providing reasonable perquisites is a market-competitive practice to attract and retain top executive talent. Rather than offering individual perquisites, however, we provide a monthly cash stipend to each of our NEOs to allow more flexibility and choice. Our NEOs have full discretion on how the cash stipend is spent and it is not tracked by the Company after the money is paid. In addition, we offer the installation of Company products and equipment at each NEO’s home to promote our brand to business and personal guests. The value of the Company products and equipment is included as taxable income to each NEO.

33

Employment Agreements and Change in Control Agreements
We have employment agreements and change in control (“CIC”) agreements with each NEO as reviewed and approved by the Committee. We believe employment agreements are helpful in attracting and retaining top executive talent and for financial and business planning purposes. We believe CIC agreements are necessary to (1) retain key executives during periods of uncertainty; (2) enable executives to objectively evaluate, negotiate and execute a CIC transaction; (3) encourage executives to remain focused on running the business rather than seeking other employment in the event of a possible CIC; (4) preserve stockholder value by providing continuity of management during a transition period; and (5) provide benefit to the Company in the form of restrictive covenants, such as non-compete and non-solicitation provisions. We do not provide tax gross-ups for any CIC agreements entered into after 2009.
Our employment agreements and CIC agreements, and the potential costs associated with each, are discussed in detail under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
Tax and Accounting Implications
Deductibility of Executive Compensation
Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act changed certain aspects of federal income taxation of executive compensation, including elimination of the "performance-based" compensation exemption to Section 162(m) which allowed a company to deduct “performance-based” compensation in excess of $1 million to NEOs.  The Committee will continue to consider the income tax consequences to our Company when analyzing our executive compensation program.  If granting awards or providing other executive compensation is consistent with Market data, our compensation philosophy or our strategic business goals, the Committee may provide executive compensation that is not fully deductible.
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
In addition to the non-qualified Supplemental Retirement Plan, our Company also maintains a frozen non-qualified Profit Sharing Restoration Plan. Both of these deferred compensation plans are administered in compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).
Accounting for Stock-Based Awards
When developing NEO compensation, the Committee considers the accounting consequences (in accordance with the requirements of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation (“FASB ASC Topic 718”)) of the program design and award levels, and structures the Company’s executive compensation program accordingly.

Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation and Human Resources Committee has reviewed and discussed the foregoing CD&A with management. Based on this review and discussion, the Committee recommended to the Board that the CD&A be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference in our Form 10-K.
Submitted by the Compensation and Human Resources Committee of the Board:
 
Kim K.W. Rucker (Chair)  John E. Major
John W. Norris, III  Karen H. Quintos
Todd J. Teske  Shane D. Wall

34

Summary Compensation Table
The following table provides information regarding the total compensation of each of the Company’s NEOs for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018. 
Name and Principal PositionYearSalary
($) (1)
Stock
Awards
($)(2)
Option
Awards
($)(3)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
Change
in Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)(4)
All
Other
Compensation
($)(5)
Total
($)
Todd M. Bluedorn20201,230,850 4,044,188 981,689 2,165,000 6,006,324 47,297 14,475,348 
Chairman and Chief Executive20191,186,250 4,037,854 986,891 1,357,811 5,602,978 46,999 13,218,783 
Officer20181,151,250 3,971,244 951,960 1,420,343 — 46,500 7,541,297 
Joseph W. Reitmeier2020561,350 758,252 184,070 553,000 1,239,612 47,155 3,343,439 
Executive Vice President and
2019540,000 815,315 199,285 346,135 918,976 46,854 2,866,565 
   Chief Financial Officer2018518,750 801,780 192,220 358,215 235,914 46,500 2,153,379 
Douglas L. Young2020618,000 902,668 219,128 630,000 1,235,828 55,943 3,661,567 
Executive Vice President and2019595,000 970,683 237,227 409,378 1,471,415 49,754 3,733,457 
Chief Operating Officer, Residential H&C
2018575,000 954,646 228,822 397,146 — 47,000 2,202,614 
Daniel M. Sessa2020540,750 758,252 184,070 532,000 1,717,220 162,998 3,895,290 
Executive Vice President and Chief
2019521,250 815,315 199,285 349,116 1,566,837 46,866 3,498,669 
   Human Resources Officer2018506,250 801,780 192,220 350,065 — 46,780 1,897,095 
John D. Torres2020525,300 758,252 184,070 517,000 1,209,187 49,783 3,243,592 
Executive Vice President, Chief2019506,250 815,315 199,285 424,501 1,278,273 49,065 3,272,689 
   Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary2018491,250 801,780 192,220 340,285 142,653 46,500 2,014,688 
 
(1)2020 includes a flat 3% lump-sum payment of beginning annual salary in lieu of the annual merit increase that is not incorporated in the current annual base salary for NEOs.
(2)The amounts shown represent the grant date fair value of the aggregate amount of all stock awards (prior to any assumed forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions, where applicable) for each year, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, in connection with RSUs and PSUs granted under the LII 2010 Incentive Plan and the 2019 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan. Assumptions used in calculating these amounts are described in Note 16 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, included in our Form 10-K. Amounts for 2020 PSUs reflect the most probable outcome for the awards on December 31, 2020 valued at the date of grant in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. If the PSUs were valued at maximum performance levels, the total PSU value at grant date would equal:
PSU Value at Maximum Performance Levels ($)
Name201820192020
Todd M. Bluedorn4,964,157 5,047,256 5,055,368 
Joseph W. Reitmeier1,002,327 1,018,959 947,881 
Douglas L. Young1,193,460 1,213,537 1,128,202 
Daniel M. Sessa1,002,327 1,018,959 947,881 
John D. Torres1,002,327 1,018,959 947,881 
 
(3)The amounts shown represent the grant date fair value of the aggregate amount of all SAR awards (prior to any assumed forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions, where applicable) for each year, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, in connection with SARs granted under the LII 2010 Incentive Plan and the 2019 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan. Assumptions used in calculating these amounts are included in Note 16 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, included in our Form 10-K.
(4)The amounts shown represent the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of accumulated pension benefits that accrued during the applicable year under our Supplemental Retirement Plan and frozen Consolidated Pension Plan, each as discussed under “Retirement Plans,” as a result of changes in the valuation discount rate, changes in compensation, and an additional one year of service. No above-market interest on nonqualified deferred compensation was earned.
35

(5)The amounts shown include perquisites and other compensation. The following table identifies the amounts attributable to each category of perquisites and other compensation in 2020 for each NEO.
 PerquisitesOther Compensation
NameCash
Stipend
Company
Equipment
and Installation
Term Life Insurance PremiumsRetirement
Contributions
Total
Todd M. Bluedorn$30,000 $— $197 $17,100 $47,297 
Joseph W. Reitmeier30,000 — 55 17,100 47,155 
Douglas L. Young30,000 8,841 17,100 55,943 
Daniel M. Sessa30,000 115,828 70 17,100 162,998 
John D. Torres30,000 2,599 84 17,100 49,783 
The values attributable to each item listed above are calculated as follows:
Cash Stipend — Cash paid to each NEO in lieu of individual perquisites.
Company Equipment and Installation — Company equipment is based on the purchase price of the equipment, adjusted in accordance with our employee rebate program. Installation of this equipment is based on the cost for installation paid by the Company in 2020.
Term Life Insurance Premiums — The amounts shown are based on the incremental cost paid in 2020 on behalf of each NEO for Basic Life and Basic Accidental Death and Dismemberment over and above the premiums we would otherwise pay under our life insurance program for other employees.
Retirement Contributions — Based on Company contributions made under our qualified 401(k) Plan in 2020.

2020 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table provides information regarding short-term incentive awards and long-term incentive awards (PSUs, RSUs and SARs) granted under the 2019 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan to our NEOs in 2020.
 Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(1)
Estimated Future
Payouts Under Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards(2)
All Other Stock
Awards: Number
of Shares of
Stock or Units
(#)(3)
All Other Option
Awards: Number
of Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)(4)
Exercise or
Base Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)(5)
Closing
Market
Price on
Date of
Grant
($/Sh)
Grant Date Fair
Value of Stock
and Option
Awards
($)(6)
NameGrant
Date
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Max.
($)
Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Max.
(#)
     
Todd M. Bluedorn746,8751,493,7503,360,938
12/11/20204,7529,50419,0082,527,684
12/11/20205,7021,516,504
12/11/202017,781278.00280.42981,689
Joseph W. Reitmeier190,750381,500858,375
12/11/20208911,7823,564473,941
12/11/20201,069284,311
12/11/20203,334278.00280.42184,070
Douglas L. Young210,000420,000945,000
12/11/20201,0612,1214,242564,101
12/11/20201,273338,567
12/11/20203,969278.00280.42219,128
Daniel M. Sessa183,750367,500826,875
12/11/20208911,7823,564473,941
12/11/20201,069284,311
12/11/20203,334278.00280.42184,070
John D. Torres178,500357,000803,250
12/11/20208911,7823,564473,941
12/11/20201,069284,311
12/11/20203,334278.00280.42184,070
36

 
(1)The amounts shown represent award opportunities under our STI Program for 2020. The awards were paid March 15, 2021 in the amounts included in the Summary Compensation Table.
(2)The amounts shown represent the number of PSUs granted, which to the extent earned, will vest and be distributed in shares of our common stock at the end of the three-year performance period ending December 31, 2023.
(3)The amounts shown represent the number of RSUs granted, which vest and will be distributed in shares of our common stock on the third anniversary of the date of grant.
(4)The amounts shown represent the number of SARs granted, which vest in one-third increments on each anniversary of the date of grant and expire seven years from the date of grant.
(5)The amounts shown reflect the exercise price of SARs granted, based on the average of the high and low NYSE trading prices of our common stock on the date of grant.
(6)The amounts shown represent the grant date fair values of PSUs, RSUs and SARs, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value for SARs was determined using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The grant date fair value for the PSU and RSU awards equals the dividend-discounted value of our common stock on the date of grant. The assumptions used to calculate the grant date fair values of such awards are set forth below.
  Assumptions  
Grant DateAwardVolatility
(%)
Expected Life
(Years)
Dividend Yield
(%)
Risk Free
Interest Rate
(%)
FMV Based on
Average High/
Low NYSE Trading
Prices on Date of
Grant ($)
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share
($)
12/11/2020PSU— — 1.48 — 278.00 265.960 
12/11/2020RSU— — 1.48 — 278.00 265.960 
12/11/2020SAR29.70 3.95 1.64 0.27 278.00 55.210 
37

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2020 Year-End

The following table provides information regarding all outstanding equity awards held by our NEOs as of December 31, 2020. 
 Options/SAR Awards(1)Stock Awards
NameNumber of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options/
SARs (#)
Exercisable(1)
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options/
SARs (#)
Unexercisable(1)
Option/
SAR
Exercise
Price
($/Sh)(2)
Option/
SAR
Expiration
Date
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not
Vested
(#)(3)
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not
Vested
($)(4)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not
Vested
(#)(5)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not
Vested
($)(4)
Todd M. Bluedorn41,649 156.940 12/9/202319,158 5,248,717 31,931 8,748,136 
31,299 205.530 12/8/2024
17,842 8,921 214.630 12/7/2025
8,349 16,699 257.080 12/13/2026
17,781 278.000 12/11/2027
Joseph W. Reitmeier9,785 92.640 12/12/20213,786 1,037,250 6,310 1,728,751 
7,959 131.940 12/11/2022
8,677 156.940 12/9/2023
6,573 205.530 12/8/2024
3,602 1,802 214.630 12/7/2025
1,686 3,372 257.080 12/13/2026
3,334 278.000 12/11/2027
Douglas L. Young9,550 131.940 12/11/20224,507 1,234,783 7,513 2,058,337 
10,412 156.940 12/9/2023
7,825 205.530 12/8/2024
4,288 2,145 214.630 12/7/2025
2,007 4,014 257.080 12/13/2026
3,969 278.000 12/11/2027
Daniel M. Sessa9,785 92.640 12/12/20213,786 1,037,250 6,310 1,728,751 
7,959 131.940 12/11/2022
8,677 156.940 12/9/2023
6,573 205.530 12/8/2024
3,602 1,802 214.630 12/7/2025
1,686 3,372 257.080 12/13/2026
3,334 278.000 12/11/2027
John D. Torres2,893 156.940 12/9/20233,786 1,037,250 6,310 1,728,751 
6,573 205.530 12/8/2024
3,602 1,802 214.630 12/7/2025
1,686 3,372 257.080 12/13/2026
3,334 278.000 12/11/2027
 
(1)Outstanding SARs vest in one-third increments on each anniversary of the date of grant, with the first anniversary date occurring one year after the date of grant.
(2)Pursuant to the LII 2010 Incentive Plan and the 2019 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan, the exercise price for all outstanding SARs is based on the grant date fair market value, which is the average of the high and low NYSE trading prices of our common stock on the date of grant.
(3)The amounts shown represent all outstanding RSUs held by the NEOs. Refer to column (a) of Table below for the vesting dates of such awards.
(4)The amounts shown are based on the NYSE closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2020 ($273.97).
(5)The amounts shown represent outstanding PSUs held by the NEOs. Refer to column (b) of the table below for the vesting dates of such awards and the performance assumptions used to calculate the number of unvested PSUs. 
38

 (a)
Shares or Units of Stock
That Have Not Vested
(b)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Unearned
Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not  Vested
NameNumber of
Awards
Vesting DateNumber of
Awards
Vesting
Date
Performance
Assumption
Todd M. Bluedorn7,277 12/7/202112,129 12/31/2021Target
6,179 12/13/202210,298 12/31/2022Target
5,702 12/11/20239,504 12/31/2023Target
Total19,158 31,931 
Joseph W. Reitmeier1,469 12/7/20212,449 12/31/2021Target
1,248 12/13/20222,079 12/31/2022Target
1,069 12/11/20231,782 12/31/2023Target
Total3,786 6,310 
Douglas L. Young1,749 12/7/20212,916 12/31/2021Target
1,485 12/13/20222,476 12/31/2022Target
1,273 12/11/20232,121 12/31/2023Target
Total4,507 7,513 
Daniel M. Sessa1,469 12/7/20212,449 12/31/2021Target
1,248 12/13/20222,079 12/31/2022Target
1,069 12/11/20231,782 12/31/2023Target
Total3,786 6,310 
John D. Torres1,469 12/7/20212,449 12/31/2021Target
1,248 12/13/20222,079 12/31/2022Target
1,069 12/11/20231,782 12/31/2023Target
Total3,786 6,310 


2020 Option/SAR Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table provides information regarding the exercise of SARs by our NEOs and each distribution of RSUs and PSUs held by our NEOs in 2020. 
 Options/SAR AwardsStock Awards
NameNumber of SARs
Exercised
(#)
Value Realized on
Exercise
($)
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#)
Value Realized on
Vesting
($)(1)
Todd M. Bluedorn36,610 5,241,271 RSU7,758 2,173,093 
PSU12,929 3,888,914 
Joseph W. Reitmeier9,549 1,903,259 RSU1,629 456,299 
PSU2,715 816,645 
Douglas L. Young22,923 4,569,486 RSU1,939 543,133 
PSU3,232 972,153 
Daniel M. Sessa10,610 2,005,449 RSU1,629 456,299 
PSU2,715 816,645 
John D. Torres— — RSU1,629 456,299 
PSU2,715 816,645 
 
(1)The dollar amounts shown for RSUs and PSUs are based on the average of the high and low NYSE trading prices of our common stock on the day of distribution.

39

Retirement Plans
Qualified Retirement Plans
Frozen Consolidated Pension and Profit Sharing Retirement Plans
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company’s Consolidated Pension Plan and Profit Sharing Retirement Plan were frozen. As of that date, benefits under the frozen Pension Plan stopped increasing with additional service and compensation, and additional contributions to the Profit Sharing Plan were discontinued.
The monthly target benefit under the frozen Pension Plan is based on 1.0% of final average annual pay, plus 0.6% of final average annual pay above Social Security covered compensation, multiplied by the number of years of credited service (not to exceed 30 years). The target benefit is reduced by the value of the participant’s defined contribution profit sharing account under the frozen Profit Sharing Plan, with the difference, if any, provided by the frozen Pension Plan. Participants vested in their frozen Pension Plan accrued benefits after five years of service and may commence unreduced benefits at age 65 (normal retirement age) or actuarially reduced benefits at younger ages if age and service requirements are met (generally the attainment of age 62 and 10 years of service or if age plus years of service total 80). Benefits are generally paid in the form of an annuity. We do not grant extra years of service under the Consolidated Pension Plan. Participants in the frozen Profit Sharing Plan are fully vested after six years of service and the Company directs the investment funds. Distributions may occur at separation from service and are eligible for roll-over into another qualified retirement plan.
401(k) Salaried Retirement Plan
Salaried employees are eligible to participate in this plan, and contributions can be made on a pre-tax or Roth post-tax basis, subject to limitations for qualified plans under the Code. Participants can contribute up to
75% of their eligible earnings and receive a Company match of 50% on up to 6% of their eligible pay. In addition, all participants (after completing one year of service) receive a base contribution equal to 3% of eligible pay. The match vests after the participant completes two years of service and the base contribution is fully vested.
Non-Qualified Retirement Plans
Supplemental Retirement Plan

    In 2018, the Committee closed the defined benefit Supplemental Retirement Plan to new participants and approved a defined contribution restoration plan for individuals who become eligible executive officers on or after January 1, 2019.  The Committee made these changes to better align the Company’s non-qualified retirement benefit with current market practices.
The purpose of our Supplemental Retirement Plan is to provide market-competitive executive level retirement benefit opportunities. It permits income above Code limitations to be considered in determining final average annual pay, doubles the rate of benefit accrual available under the frozen Pension Plan (2.0% of final average annual pay, plus 1.2% of final average annual pay above Social Security covered compensation), limits credited service to 15 years, generally permits early retirement on more favorable terms than the frozen Pension Plan (for example, unreduced benefits at age 62 with 10 years of service or unreduced benefits at age 60 if age plus years of service total 80), and pays benefits in the form of a lump-sum. Any benefits provided under the Supplemental Retirement Plan are reduced by the benefits payable under our Company’s frozen Pension Plan (as if such plan had not been frozen), frozen Profit Sharing Plan, and frozen Profit Sharing Restoration Plan. Participants become vested in their Supplemental Retirement Plan benefit after five years of service. Extra years of credited service are not provided to participants except for up to an additional three years of service and age (subject to the 15 year service limit) in the case of a change in control. The incremental effects of additional years of service are reflected in the tables included in “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
Frozen Profit Sharing Restoration Plan
We froze the Profit Sharing Restoration Plan and discontinued contributions effective January 1, 2009. Distributions may occur at separation from service and may be paid as a lump-sum or in equal annual installments over either a five- or ten-year period. We direct the investment funds for the frozen Profit Sharing Restoration Plan,
40

which mirror the investments and returns under the frozen Profit Sharing Retirement Plan. The weighted average annual rate of return for the calendar year ended December 31, 2020, was 11.8%.

2020 Pension Benefits
The following table provides information regarding the number of years of service credited to each NEO and the present value of accumulated benefits payable to each NEO under our frozen Consolidated Pension Plan and our Supplemental Retirement Plan as of December 31, 2020, as well as payments made to each NEO in 2020 under such plans. 
NamePlan NameNumber of
Years
Credited
Service
(#)
Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefit
($)(1)
Payments
During
Last Year
($)
Todd M. BluedornConsolidated Pension Plan (Frozen)1.9 66,945 0
Supplemental Retirement Plan13.9 23,748,260 0
Joseph W. ReitmeierConsolidated Pension Plan (Frozen)3.3 88,809 0
Supplemental Retirement Plan8.6 3,661,370 0
Douglas L. YoungConsolidated Pension Plan (Frozen)9.6 99,305 0
Supplemental Retirement Plan15.0 7,959,310 0
Daniel M. SessaConsolidated Pension Plan (Frozen)1.7 56,406 0
Supplemental Retirement Plan13.7 6,535,339 0
John D. Torres(2)Consolidated Pension Plan (Frozen) N/A N/A0
Supplemental Retirement Plan12.0 5,728,970 0
 
(1)The actuarial present value of the lump-sum accumulated benefit payable at December 31, 2020 is equal to the annualized present value factor, multiplied by the monthly benefit. The amounts shown are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 715, using a 1.39% interest (discount) rate for the Supplemental Retirement Plan and 2.82% for the Consolidated Pension Plan as of December 31, 2020 and the Pri-2012 healthy retiree mortality rates, with a white collar adjustment, with generational projections of mortality improvement using scale MP-2020. The calculations assume payments are deferred until age 65 for all participants under our frozen Consolidated Pension Plan and until the earliest unreduced retirement age for each participant under our Supplemental Retirement Plan. Additional assumptions are included in Note 11 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, included in our Form 10-K.
(2)Mr. Torres was not eligible to participate in the Consolidated Pension Plan prior to the plan being frozen.

2020 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
The following table provides information regarding contributions, earnings, withdrawals and distributions under our frozen Profit Sharing Restoration Plan in 2020 for each NEO, as well as each NEO’s aggregate balance in such plan at December 31, 2020. 
NameExecutive
Contributions in
Last Year
($)
Company
Contributions in
Last Year
($)
Aggregate Earnings in
Last Year
($)
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
Aggregate
Balance
at Last
Year-End
($)
Todd M. Bluedorn0010,814 0102,218 
Joseph W. Reitmeier(1)N/AN/AN/A N/AN/A
Douglas L. Young0055,162 0521,375 
Daniel M. Sessa002,579 024,378 
John D. Torres(1)N/AN/AN/A N/AN/A
 
(1)Mr. Reitmeier and Mr. Torres were not eligible to participate in the Profit Sharing Restoration Plan prior to the plan being frozen.


41

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
Employment Agreements and Change in Control Agreements
We are party to employment agreements and CIC agreements with each NEO. These agreements serve as the basis for the payments and benefits to which each NEO would be entitled in the event of termination of employment with our Company under the various circumstances described below.
Employment Agreements
The employment agreements with our NEOs establish the basis of compensation and responsibilities for each NEO and contain post-employment covenants, including confidentiality, prohibition against the diversion of employees, vendors and contractors and prohibition against the solicitation of customers, for a period of 24 months following termination of employment. On January 1 of each year, the agreements automatically renew for an additional year, unless either party notifies the other in writing at least 30 days prior to such date of its decision not to renew the agreement. Except as otherwise provided below, the terms and conditions of our employment agreement with each NEO are substantially similar.
Change in Control Agreements
Our CIC agreements with our NEOs, the terms and conditions of which are substantially similar except as noted below, provide for benefits under specified circumstances if a NEO’s employment is terminated in connection with a CIC transaction. The agreements require the NEO to maintain the confidentiality of our information and not to induce our employees to terminate their employment with our Company, for a period of 24 months following termination of employment.
All CIC agreements entered into after 2009 do not include a tax gross-up provision. As provided in the “Tables Illustrating Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control”, no NEO would have received an excise tax gross-up payment upon termination on December 31, 2020 due to a change in control.
Payments Made Upon Voluntary Termination or Upon For Cause Termination
If a NEO voluntarily terminates his employment with our Company or we terminate a NEO for cause, he will be entitled to receive base salary through the last day of employment and a lump-sum payment equal to unused, accrued vacation days. Unvested SARs, RSUs and PSUs terminate on the NEO’s last day of employment. Vested SARs will be exercisable for 90 days after the last day of employment if the NEO voluntarily terminates his employment.
Payments Made Upon Retirement
If a NEO retires, he is entitled to receive his base salary through the last day of employment, a payment under our short-term incentive program based on company performance (prorated through the NEO’s last day of employment) and a lump-sum payment equal to unused, accrued vacation days. In addition, with respect to long-term incentive awards: 
unvested SARs terminate on the NEO’s last day of employment and vested SARs remain exercisable for the remainder of the term of the award;
for RSUs, the NEO receives a prorated portion of shares based on the date of retirement at the end of the applicable vesting period; and
for PSUs, the NEO receives, to the extent earned based on achievement of specific performance measures, a prorated portion of shares based on the date of retirement at the end of the applicable performance period.
42

Payments Made Upon Involuntary — Not for Cause Termination
If we terminate a NEO prior to the expiration of his employment agreement (including non-renewal of the NEO’s agreement) for any reason other than for cause, the NEO is generally entitled to receive “normal severance compensation” or, in the NEO’s sole discretion, “enhanced severance benefits.” Under both severance packages:
all vested SARs continue to be exercisable for 90 days following the NEO’s last day of employment; and
unvested equity awards (SARs, RSUs and PSUs) terminate on the NEO’s last day of employment.

Normal Severance Compensation. If the NEO elects to receive “normal severance compensation,” he will receive monthly payments equal to the greater of (1) his monthly base salary for the remainder of the employment agreement’s term, or (2) three months of his monthly base salary in addition to any other compensation or benefits applicable to an employee at the NEO’s level, including a lump-sum payment equal to unused, accrued vacation days.
Enhanced Severance Benefits. If the NEO agrees to execute a written general release of any and all possible claims against us existing at the time of termination, we will provide the employee with “enhanced severance benefits.” Payments provided under this severance arrangement, which are dependent on years of service with our Company, generally include the following:
Component Less than Three Years of Service Three or More Years of Service
Base Salary One year of base salary Two years of base salary
Short-Term Incentive Lump-sum payment equal to all payments under our STI programs received by the NEO in the previous 12 months Lump-sum payment equal to all payments under our STI programs received by the NEO in the previous 24 months
Payment in Lieu of Outplacement Services Lump-sum payment equal to 10% of base salary Same
Payment in Lieu of Perquisites Lump-sum payment equal to 10% of base salary Same
Post-Employment Health Care Coverage Payment of COBRA premiums for up to 18 months while the NEO is unemployed and not eligible for other group health coverage and payment of the equivalent of such premium for up to an additional six months, should the NEO remain unemployed Same
Death Benefit If the NEO dies during the enhanced severance period, a lump-sum death benefit equal to six months of the NEO’s base salary will be paid to the NEO’s beneficiary Same
Accrued Vacation A lump-sum payment equal to unused, accrued vacation days Same
Payments Made Upon Death or Disability
Generally, if a NEO dies during the term of his employment agreement, the NEO’s beneficiary is entitled to receive “normal severance compensation,” as described above. If a NEO becomes permanently disabled during the agreement term, he will generally be entitled to, at the NEO’s option, either “normal severance compensation” or “enhanced severance benefits,” as described above. In the case of either death or disability, with respect to long-term incentive awards: 
all SARs vest immediately and remain exercisable for the duration of the term;
for RSUs, the NEO, or his beneficiary, receives a prorated payment based upon the portion of the vesting period the NEO actually served as an employee payable at the time employment ceases; and
for PSUs, the NEO, or his beneficiary, receives, to the extent earned based on achievement of performance measures, a prorated portion of shares based upon the portion of the performance period the NEO actually served as our employee, payable at the time employment ceases.

43

Payments Made to our CEO if he Terminates his Employment for “Good Reason,” Upon Involuntary — Not for Cause Termination, or Upon Death or Disability
Except as described below, Mr. Bluedorn receives similar severance benefits as the other NEOs. Mr. Bluedorn’s employment agreement provides for certain severance benefits in the event he terminates his employment for “good reason.” “Good reason” includes: 
any change in Mr. Bluedorn’s position, authority, duties, or responsibilities inconsistent with the position of CEO (excluding de minimis changes and an isolated, insubstantial and inadvertent action not taken in bad faith and promptly remedied by the Company after notice);
any failure by the Company to comply with any of the provisions of Mr. Bluedorn’s employment agreement (excluding an isolated, insubstantial and inadvertent action not taken in bad faith and promptly remedied by the Company after notice);
any requirement for him to be based at any office or location other than our current headquarters in Richardson, Texas;
any purported termination by the Company of Mr. Bluedorn’s employment otherwise than as expressly permitted by his employment agreement; or
any failure by our Board to nominate him for election by the stockholders as a director.
Pursuant to his employment agreement, in the event (1) Mr. Bluedorn terminates his employment for “good reason,” (2) we terminate him prior to the expiration of his employment agreement (including non-renewal of his agreement) for any reason other than for cause, or (3) Mr. Bluedorn dies or becomes permanently disabled during the term of his employment agreement, he (or his beneficiary, as applicable) is entitled to receive “enhanced severance benefits” as described above under “Payments Made Upon Involuntary — Not For Cause Termination,” provided Mr. Bluedorn (or his personal representative, as applicable) agrees to execute a written general release of any and all possible claims against us existing at the time of termination.
In the case of either death or permanent disability, Mr. Bluedorn’s long-term incentive awards vest, remain exercisable and paid or distributed as described above under “Payments Made Upon Death or Disability.”
Payments Made Upon a Change in Control
Definition of Change in Control
Under our existing NEO employment agreements and equity award agreements entered into prior to December 2019 (under the 2010 Incentive Plan), a CIC generally includes the occurrence of any of the following events:  
an acquisition by a third party of 35% or more of our voting stock;
a change in a majority of Board members without majority Board approval;
stockholder approval of the liquidation or dissolution of our Company;
stockholder approval of a merger, consolidation or reorganization; or
stockholder approval of the sale of substantially all corporate assets.

NEO equity award agreements entered into and after December 2019 under the 2019 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan contain a modified definition of CIC. The last two CIC events above are triggered by the consummation, rather than the stockholder approval, of a merger, consolidation, reorganization, or sale of substantially all the corporate assets.
44

Definition of Good Reason
“Good reason,” under each CIC agreement, includes: 
any change in the NEO’s position, authority, duties, or responsibilities (excluding de minimis changes);
any failure to comply with the NEO’s CIC agreement, including without limitation the provision regarding compensation and benefits;
a required relocation to any office or location not within 35 miles of the NEO’s current office or location;
any failure by any successor to adopt and comply with the NEO’s CIC agreement; or
any failure to re-elect to the Board any NEO serving as a member of the Board.
45

Change in Control Benefits
If a NEO’s employment is terminated without cause or by the NEO for “good reason” either (1) within two years following a CIC, or (2) within six months prior to a CIC, we will provide the NEO with the following CIC benefits:
Component  CIC Benefit
Base Salary Severance  Lump-sum payment equal to three times the NEO’s annual base salary
Prorated Bonus  Lump-sum payment equal to the NEO’s target bonus, prorated based on the last day of employment
Bonus Severance  Lump-sum payment equal to three times the NEO’s target bonus
Payment in Lieu of Outplacement Services  Lump-sum payment equal to 15% of current base salary
Payment in Lieu of Perquisites  Lump-sum payment equal to 45% of current base salary
Post-Employment Health Care Coverage  Payment of COBRA premiums for up to 36 months while the NEO is unemployed and not eligible for other group health coverage
Supplemental Retirement Plan and Profit Sharing Restoration Plan  Three years added to each of the service and age criteria
Tax Gross-up(*)  If CIC payments are subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, an additional “gross-up payment”
Accrued Vacation  A lump-sum payment equal to unused, accrued vacation days
 
*The CIC agreement with Mr. Reitmeier does not include a tax gross up provision.
Upon a CIC, all outstanding SARs, RSUs and PSUs held by the NEO immediately vest and become exercisable, with applicable performance measures for outstanding PSUs deemed to have been satisfied at the highest possible level (200% of target). Further, outstanding SARs may be exercised by the NEO up to 90 days after a NEO’s termination within one year following a CIC.
Tables Illustrating Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
The following tables provide information regarding the benefits to which each NEO would be entitled in the event of termination of such individual’s employment with our Company under specified circumstances, including a CIC. Except as otherwise noted, the amounts shown (1) are estimates only and (2) assume that (a) termination was effective as of December 31, 2020, (b) in the case of disability, the NEO elects to receive “enhanced severance benefits,” (c) in the case of retirement, the NEO is eligible for retirement and (d) in the case of CIC, the NEO terminates for “good reason” or is involuntarily terminated without cause.
Todd M. Bluedorn
   Involuntary-Not For
Cause Termination
    
ComponentVoluntary
Termination
RetirementNormal
Severance
Enhanced
Severance(1)
DeathDisabilityFor Cause
Termination
Change in
Control
Base Salary$$$298,750 $2,390,000 $2,390,000 $2,390,000 $$3,585,000 
Prorated Bonusn/an/an/an/an/an/an/a1,493,750 
Bonus2,778,154 2,778,154 2,778,154 4,481,250 
Payment in Lieu of Outplacement Services119,500 119,500 119,500 179,250 
Payment in Lieu of Perquisites119,500 119,500 119,500 537,750 
Post-Employment Health Care Coverage40,762 25,923 40,762 70,829 
Long-Term Equity Accelerated Vesting(2)5,158,026 5,969,444 5,969,444 23,556,407 
Incremental Payment Under Supplemental Retirement Plan & Frozen Profit Sharing Restoration Plan5,276,147 
280G Tax Gross-up
Unused, Accrued Vacation(3)114,904 114,904 114,904 114,904 114,904 114,904 114,904 114,904 
TOTAL$114,904 $5,272,930 $413,654 $5,562,820 $11,517,425 $11,532,264 $114,904 $39,295,287 
 
46

(1)The amounts shown reflect the same severance benefits that would be provided to Mr. Bluedorn if he terminated employment with our Company for “good reason” under his employment agreement as discussed above.
(2)The amounts shown reflect pro-rata vesting of unvested long-term incentive awards. These amounts are based on the NYSE closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2020, which was $273.97.
(3)The amounts shown represent a lump-sum payment for five weeks of vacation in 2020 (assuming the NEO did not take any vacation days in 2020). Payouts may vary depending on the specific circumstances.

Joseph W. Reitmeier
   Involuntary-Not For
Cause Termination
    
ComponentVoluntary
Termination
RetirementNormal
Severance
Enhanced
Severance
DeathDisabilityFor Cause
Termination
Change in
Control
Base Salary$$$136,250 $1,090,000 $136,250 $1,090,000 $$1,635,000 
Prorated Bonusn/an/an/an/an/an/an/a381,500 
Bonus704,350 704,350 1,144,500 
Payment in Lieu of Outplacement Services54,500 54,500 81,750 
Payment in Lieu of Perquisites54,500 54,500 245,250 
Post-Employment Health Care Coverage38,485 62,023 
Long-Term Equity Accelerated Vesting(1)1,040,861 1,204,744 1,204,744 4,658,635 
Incremental Payment Under Supplemental Retirement Plan and Frozen Profit Sharing Restoration Plan1,992,842 
280G Tax Gross-upN/A
Unused, Accrued Vacation(2)52,404 52,404 52,404 52,404 52,404 52,404 52,404 52,404 
TOTAL$52,404 $1,093,265 $188,654 $1,994,239 $1,393,398 $3,160,498 $52,404 $10,253,904 
 

(1)The amounts shown reflect pro-rata vesting of unvested long-term incentive awards. These amounts are based on the NYSE closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2020, which was $273.97.
(2)The amounts shown represent a lump-sum payment for five weeks of vacation in 2020 (assuming the NEO did not take any vacation days in 2020). Payouts may vary depending on the specific circumstances.
47

Douglas L. Young
   Involuntary-Not For
Cause Termination
    
ComponentVoluntary
Termination
RetirementNormal
Severance
Enhanced
Severance
DeathDisabilityFor Cause
Termination
Change in
Control
Base Salary$$$150,000 $1,200,000 $150,000 $1,200,000 $$1,800,000 
Prorated Bonusn/an/an/an/an/an/an/a420,000 
Bonus806,524 806,524 1,260,000 
Payment in Lieu of Outplacement Services60,000 60,000 90,000 
Payment in Lieu of Perquisites60,000 60,000 270,000 
Post-Employment Health Care Coverage38,485 62,023 
Long-Term Equity Accelerated Vesting(1)1,239,205 1,434,285 1,434,285 5,546,537 
Incremental Payment Under Supplemental Retirement Plan and Frozen Profit Sharing Restoration Plan434,987 
280G Tax Gross-up
Unused, Accrued Vacation(2)57,692 57,692 57,692 57,692 57,692 57,692 57,692 57,692 
TOTAL$57,692 $1,296,897 $207,692 $2,222,701 $1,641,977 $3,618,501 $57,692 $9,941,239 
 
(1)The amounts shown reflect pro-rata vesting of unvested long-term incentive awards. These amounts are based on the NYSE closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2020, which was $273.97.
(2)The amounts shown represent a lump-sum payment for five weeks of vacation in 2020 (assuming the NEO did not take any vacation days in 2020). Payouts may vary depending on the specific circumstances.

Daniel M. Sessa
   Involuntary-Not For
Cause Termination
    
ComponentVoluntary
Termination
RetirementNormal
Severance
Enhanced
Severance
DeathDisabilityFor Cause
Termination
Change in
Control
Base Salary$$$131,250 $1,050,000 $131,250 $1,050,000 $$1,575,000 
Prorated Bonusn/an/an/an/an/an/an/a367,500 
Bonus699,181 699,181 1,102,500 
Payment in Lieu of Outplacement Services52,500 52,500 78,750 
Payment in Lieu of Perquisites52,500 52,500 236,250 
Post-Employment Health Care Coverage24,490 40,428 
Long-Term Equity Accelerated Vesting(1)1,040,861 1,204,744 1,204,744 4,658,635 
Incremental Payment Under Supplemental Retirement Plan and Frozen Profit Sharing Restoration Plan1,412,679 
280G Tax Gross-up
Unused, Accrued Vacation(2)50,481 50,481 50,481 50,481 50,481 50,481 50,481 50,481 
TOTAL$50,481 $1,091,342 $181,731 $1,929,152 $1,386,475 $3,109,406 $50,481 $9,522,223 
 
 
(1)The amounts shown reflect pro-rata vesting of unvested long-term incentive awards. These amounts are based on the NYSE closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2020, which was $273.97.
(2)The amounts shown represent a lump-sum payment for five weeks of vacation in 2020 (assuming the NEO did not take any vacation days in 2020). Payouts may vary depending on the specific circumstances.
48

John D. Torres
   Involuntary-Not For
Cause Termination
    
ComponentVoluntary
Termination
RetirementNormal
Severance
Enhanced
Severance
DeathDisabilityFor Cause
Termination
Change in
Control
Base Salary$$$127,500 $1,020,000 $127,500 $1,020,000 $$1,530,000 
Prorated Bonus