Commitments and Contingencies:

Product Warranties and Product Related Contingencies

We offer warranties to customers for some of our products and record liabilities for estimated future warranty-related costs based on failure rates, cost experience and other factors. We periodically review the assumptions used to determine the product warranty liabilities and will adjust the liabilities in future periods for changes in assumptions, as necessary.

Liabilities for estimated product warranty costs related to continuing operations are included in the following captions on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):



	As of March 31, 2017		As of December 31, 2016
Accrued expenses	$	30.8	$	30.0
Other liabilities	71.8		71.1
Total warranty liability	$	102.6	$	101.1

The changes in product warranty liabilities related to continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2017 were as follows (in millions):



Total warranty liability as of December 31, 2016	$	101.1
Warranty claims paid	(5.2		)
Changes resulting from issuance of new warranties	8.2
Changes in estimates associated with pre-existing liabilities	(1.7		)
Changes in foreign currency translation rates and other	0.2
Total warranty liability as of March 31, 2017	$	102.6

We have incurred, and will likely continue to incur, product costs not covered by insurance or our suppliers’ warranties, which is not included in the estimated warranty liabilities tables immediately above. Also, to satisfy our customers and protect our brands, we have repaired or replaced installed products experiencing quality-related issues, and will likely continue such repairs and replacements. We currently estimate our probable liability for a certain supplier quality issue within a range of $0.9 million and $9.1 million with all amounts in that range equally likely. We have accrued a $0.9 million liability in Accrued expenses on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2017. The supplier is reimbursing the majority of costs related to this liability.

Litigation

We are involved in a number of claims and lawsuits incident to the operation of our businesses. Insurance coverages are maintained and estimated costs are recorded for such claims and lawsuits, including costs to settle claims and lawsuits, based on experience involving similar matters and specific facts known.

Some of these claims and lawsuits allege personal injury or health problems resulting from exposure to asbestos that was integrated into certain of our products. We have never manufactured asbestos and have not incorporated asbestos-containing components into our products for several decades. A substantial majority of asbestos-related claims have been covered by insurance or other forms of indemnity or have been dismissed without payment. The remainder of our closed cases have been resolved for amounts that are not material, individually or in the aggregate. Our defense costs for asbestos-related claims are generally covered by insurance; however, our insurance coverage for settlements and judgments for asbestos-related claims varies depending on several factors and are subject to policy limits, so we may have greater financial exposure for future settlements and judgments. For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, expense for asbestos-related litigation was $1.7 million and $0.8 million, respectively, net of probable insurance recoveries, for known and future asbestos-related litigation.

In October 2016, we self-reported to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) an alleged payment in the amount of 30,000 rubles (approximately US $475) to a Russian customs broker or official. Under the oversight of our Audit Committee, we initiated an investigation into this matter with the assistance of external legal counsel and external forensic accountants. The alleged payment was purportedly made to release a shipment of goods being held by Russian customs officials due to inaccurate paperwork. The value of the shipment was approximately €62,000(approximately US $68,500). The allegations are related to our subsidiary in Russia, which had 2016 annual sales of US $4 million. The scope of the investigation was later expanded to include our operations in Poland and Ukraine. To date, the investigation has not resulted in any evidence of other potentially improper payments. However, the investigation has raised questions regarding possible irregularities with respect to possible non-compliance with customs documents and procedures related to these operations. The investigation is ongoing. We continue to fully cooperate with the SEC and the DOJ regarding this matter. We do not anticipate any material adverse effect on our business or financial condition as a result of this matter.

It is management's opinion that none of these claims or lawsuits or any threatened litigation will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Claims and lawsuits, however, involve uncertainties and it is possible that their eventual outcome could adversely affect our results of operations for a particular period.