XML 28 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.22.2
Fair Value Measurement and Fair Value of Financial Instruments
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2022
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurement and Fair Value of Financial Instruments Fair Value Measurement and Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair Value Determination

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or the price that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In determining the fair value of financial instruments, the Company uses various methods including market and income approaches. Based on these approaches, the Company utilizes certain assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated or generally unobservable. The Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy described below is based on the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair value. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices available in active markets and the lowest priority to prices derived from data lacking transparency. The fair value of the Company’s assets and liabilities is classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

Level 1 — Valuation is based on quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.
Level 2 — Valuation is based on quoted prices for similar instruments traded in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments traded in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable and can be corroborated by market data.
Level 3 — Valuation is based on significant unobservable inputs for determining the fair value of assets or liabilities. These significant unobservable inputs reflect assumptions that market participants may use in pricing the assets or liabilities.
The classification of assets and liabilities within the hierarchy is based on whether inputs to the valuation methodology used are observable or unobservable, and the significance of those inputs in the fair value measurement. The Company’s assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to their fair value measurements.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following section describes the valuation methodologies used by the Company to measure financial assets and liabilities on a recurring basis, as well as the general classification of these instruments pursuant to the fair value hierarchy.

Available-for-Sale Debt Securities — The fair value of AFS debt securities is generally determined by independent external pricing service providers who have experience in valuing these securities or by taking the average quoted market prices obtained from independent external brokers. The valuations provided by the third-party pricing service providers are based on observable market inputs, which include benchmark yields, reported trades, issuer spreads, benchmark securities, bids, offers, prepayment expectations and reference data obtained from market research publications. Inputs used by the third-party pricing service providers in valuing collateralized mortgage obligations and other securitization structures also include new issue data, monthly payment information, whole loan collateral performance, tranche evaluation and “To Be Announced” prices. In valuing securities issued by state and political subdivisions, inputs used by third-party pricing service providers also include material event notices.

On a monthly basis, the Company validates the valuations provided by third-party pricing service providers to ensure that the fair value determination is consistent with the applicable accounting guidance and the financial instruments are properly classified in the fair value hierarchy. To perform this validation, the Company evaluates the fair values of securities by comparing the fair values provided by the third-party pricing service providers to prices from other available independent sources for the same securities. When significant variances in prices are identified, the Company further compares inputs used by different sources to ascertain the reliability of these sources. On a quarterly basis, the Company reviews the valuation inputs and methodology for each security category furnished by third-party pricing service providers.

When available, the Company uses quoted market prices to determine the fair value of AFS debt securities that are classified as Level 1. Level 1 AFS debt securities consist of U.S. Treasury securities. When pricing is unavailable from third-party pricing service providers for certain securities, the Company requests market quotes from various independent external brokers and utilizes the average quoted market prices. In addition, the Company obtains market quotes from other official published sources. As these valuations are based on observable inputs in the current marketplace, they are classified as Level 2. The Company periodically communicates with the independent external brokers to validate their pricing methodology. Information such as pricing sources, pricing assumptions, data inputs and valuation techniques are reviewed periodically.

Equity Securities — Equity securities consisted of mutual funds as of both June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021. The Company invested in these mutual funds for Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) purposes. The Company uses net asset value (“NAV”) information to determine the fair value of these equity securities. When NAV is available periodically and the equity securities can be put back to the transfer agents at the publicly available NAV, the fair value of the equity securities is classified as Level 1. When NAV is available periodically but the equity securities may not be readily marketable at its periodic NAV in the secondary market, the fair value of these equity securities is classified as Level 2.

Interest Rate Contracts The Company enters into interest rate swap and option contracts that are not designated as hedging instruments with its borrowers to lock in attractive intermediate and long-term interest rates, resulting in the customer obtaining a synthetic fixed-rate loan. To economically hedge against the interest rate risks in the products offered to its customers, the Company enters into mirrored offsetting interest rate contracts with third-party financial institutions. The Company also enters into interest rate swap or interest rate collar contracts with institutional counterparties to hedge against certain variable interest rate borrowings and variable interest rate loans. These interest rate contracts with institutional counterparties are designated as cash flow hedges. The fair value of the interest rate swaps is determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash payments (or receipts) and the discounted expected variable cash receipts (or payments). The fair value of the interest rate options, which consist of floors and caps, is determined using the market standard methodology of discounting the future expected cash receipts that would occur if variable interest rates fall below (rise above) the strike rate of the floors (caps). In addition, to comply with the provisions of ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, the Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements of its derivatives. The credit valuation adjustments associated with the Company’s derivatives utilize model-derived credit spreads, which are Level 3 inputs. Considering the observable nature of all other significant inputs utilized, the Company classifies these derivative instruments as Level 2.
Foreign Exchange Contracts The Company enters into foreign exchange contracts to accommodate the business needs of its customers. For a majority of the foreign exchange contracts entered with its customers, the Company entered into offsetting foreign exchange contracts with third-party financial institutions to manage its exposure. The Company also utilizes foreign exchange contracts that are not designated as hedging instruments to mitigate the economic effect of fluctuations in certain foreign currency on-balance sheet assets and liabilities, primarily foreign currency denominated deposits that it offers to its customers. The fair value of foreign exchange contracts is determined at each reporting period based on changes in the foreign exchange rates. These are over-the-counter contracts where quoted market prices are not readily available. Valuation is measured using conventional valuation methodologies with observable market data. Due to the short-term nature of the majority of these contracts, the counterparties’ credit risks are considered nominal and result in no adjustments to the valuation of the foreign exchange contracts. Due to the observable nature of the inputs used in deriving the fair value of these contracts, the valuation of foreign exchange contracts is classified as Level 2. As of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the Bank held foreign currency non-deliverable forward contracts to hedge its net investment in its China subsidiary, East West Bank (China) Limited, a non-U.S. dollar (“USD”) functional currency subsidiary in China. These foreign currency non-deliverable forward contracts were designated as net investment hedges. The fair value of foreign currency non-deliverable forward contracts is determined by comparing the contracted foreign exchange rate to the current market foreign exchange rate. Key inputs of the current market exchange rate include spot rates and forward rates of the contractual currencies. Foreign exchange forward curves are used to determine which forward rate pertains to a specific maturity. Due to the observable nature of the inputs used in deriving the estimated fair value, these instruments are classified as Level 2.

Credit Contracts — The Company may periodically enter into credit risk participation agreements (“RPAs”) to manage the credit exposure on interest rate contracts associated with the syndicated loans. The Company may enter into protection sold or protection purchased RPAs with institutional counterparties. The fair value of RPAs is calculated by determining the total expected asset or liability exposure of the derivatives to the borrowers and applying the borrowers’ credit spread to that exposure. Total expected exposure incorporates both the current and potential future exposure of the derivatives, derived from using observable inputs, such as yield curves and volatilities. Since the majority of the inputs used to value the RPAs are observable, RPAs are classified as Level 2.

Equity Contracts — As part of the loan origination process, the Company may obtain warrants to purchase preferred and/or common stock of the borrowers, which are mainly in the technology and life sciences sectors. As of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the warrants included on the Consolidated Financial Statements were from both public and private companies. The Company values these warrants based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model. For warrants from public companies, the model uses the underlying stock price, stated strike price, warrant expiration date, risk-free interest rate based on a duration-matched U.S. Treasury rate, and market-observable company-specific option volatility as inputs to value the warrants. Due to the observable nature of the inputs used in deriving the estimated fair value, warrants from public companies are classified as Level 2. For warrants from private companies, the model uses inputs such as the offering price observed in the most recent round of funding, stated strike price, warrant expiration date, risk-free interest rate based on duration-matched U.S. Treasury rate and option volatility. The Company applies proxy volatilities based on the industry sectors of the private companies. The model values are then adjusted for a general lack of liquidity due to the private nature of the underlying companies. Since both option volatility and liquidity discount assumptions are subject to management’s judgment, measurement uncertainty is inherent in the valuation of private company warrants. Due to the unobservable nature of the option volatility and liquidity discount assumptions used in deriving the estimated fair value, warrants from private companies are classified as Level 3. On a quarterly basis, the changes in the fair value of warrants from private companies are reviewed for reasonableness, and a measurement of uncertainty analysis on the option volatility and liquidity discount assumptions is performed.

Commodity Contracts — The Company enters into energy commodity contracts consisting of swaps and options with its oil and gas loan customers, which allow them to hedge against the risk of fluctuation in energy commodity prices. The fair value of the commodity option contracts is determined using the Black-Scholes model and assumptions that include expectations of future commodity price and volatility. The future commodity contract price is derived from observable inputs such as the market price of the commodity. Commodity swaps are structured as an exchange of fixed cash flows for floating cash flows. The fair value of the commodity swaps is determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash payments (or receipts) and the discounted expected variable cash receipts (or payments) based on the market prices of the commodity. The fixed cash flows are predetermined based on the known volumes and fixed price as specified in the swap agreement. The floating cash flows are correlated with the change of forward commodity prices, which is derived from market corroborated futures settlement prices. As a result, the Company classifies these derivative instruments as Level 2 due to the observable nature of the significant inputs utilized.
The following tables present financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021:
($ in thousands)Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
as of June 30, 2022
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Fair Value
AFS debt securities:
U.S. Treasury securities$624,686 $— $— $624,686 
U.S. government agency and U.S. government-sponsored enterprise debt securities— 285,245 — 285,245 
U.S. government agency and U.S. government-sponsored enterprise mortgage-backed securities:
Commercial mortgage-backed securities— 563,832 — 563,832 
Residential mortgage-backed securities— 1,910,240 — 1,910,240 
Municipal securities— 266,733 — 266,733 
Non-agency mortgage-backed securities:
Commercial mortgage-backed securities— 411,768 — 411,768 
Residential mortgage-backed securities— 726,989 — 726,989 
Corporate debt securities— 559,293 — 559,293 
Foreign government bonds— 242,997 — 242,997 
Asset-backed securities— 67,350 — 67,350 
Collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”)— 596,371 — 596,371 
Total AFS debt securities
$624,686 $5,630,818 $ $6,255,504 
Investments in tax credit and other investments:
Equity securities$20,463 $4,312 $— $24,775 
Total investments in tax credit and other investments
$20,463 $4,312 $ $24,775 
Derivative assets:
Interest rate contracts$— $261,326 $— $261,326 
Foreign exchange contracts— 42,324 — 42,324 
Equity contracts— 357 359 
Commodity contracts— 404,275 — 404,275 
Gross derivative assets$ $707,927 $357 $708,284 
Netting adjustments (1)
$— $(251,718)$— $(251,718)
Net derivative assets$ $456,209 $357 $456,566 
Derivative liabilities:
Interest rate contracts$— $359,674 $— $359,674 
Foreign exchange contracts— 29,144 — 29,144 
Credit contracts— 76 — 76 
Commodity contracts— 373,675 — 373,675 
Gross derivative liabilities$ $762,569 $ $762,569 
Netting adjustments (1)
$— $(126,414)$— $(126,414)
Net derivative liabilities$ $636,155 $ $636,155 
($ in thousands)Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
as of December 31, 2021
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Fair Value
AFS debt securities:
U.S. Treasury securities$1,032,681 $— $— $1,032,681 
U.S. government agency and U.S. government-sponsored enterprise debt securities— 1,301,971 — 1,301,971 
U.S. government agency and U.S. government-sponsored enterprise mortgage-backed securities:
Commercial mortgage-backed securities— 1,228,980 — 1,228,980 
Residential mortgage-backed securities— 2,928,283 — 2,928,283 
Municipal securities— 523,158 — 523,158 
Non-agency mortgage-backed securities:
Commercial mortgage-backed securities— 496,443 — 496,443 
Residential mortgage-backed securities— 881,931 — 881,931 
Corporate debt securities— 649,665 — 649,665 
Foreign government bonds— 257,733 — 257,733 
Asset-backed securities— 74,558 — 74,558 
CLOs— 589,950 — 589,950 
Total AFS debt securities
$1,032,681 $8,932,672 $ $9,965,353 
Investments in tax credit and other investments:
Equity securities$22,130 $4,474 $— $26,604 
Total investments in tax credit and other investments
$22,130 $4,474 $ $26,604 
Derivative assets:
Interest rate contracts$— $240,222 $— $240,222 
Foreign exchange contracts— 21,033 — 21,033 
Equity contracts— 215 220 
Commodity contracts— 222,709 — 222,709 
Gross derivative assets$ $483,969 $215 $484,184 
Netting adjustments (1)
$— $(100,953)$— $(100,953)
Net derivative assets$ $383,016 $215 $383,231 
Derivative liabilities:
Interest rate contracts$— $179,962 $— $179,962 
Foreign exchange contracts— 15,501 — 15,501 
Credit contracts— 141 — 141 
Commodity contracts— 194,567 — 194,567 
Gross derivative liabilities$ $390,171 $ $390,171 
Netting adjustments (1)
$— $(232,727)$— $(232,727)
Net derivative liabilities$ $157,444 $ $157,444 
(1)Represents balance sheet netting of derivative assets and liabilities and related cash collateral under master netting agreements or similar agreements. See Note 6 — Derivatives to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q for additional information.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, Level 3 fair value measurements that were measured on a recurring basis consisted of equity contracts issued by private companies. The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of these equity contracts for the three and six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021:
($ in thousands)Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
2022202120222021
Equity contracts
Beginning balance$309 $272 $215 $273 
Total gains included in earnings (1)
48 47 51 46 
Issuances— — 91 — 
Settlements— (96)— (96)
Ending balance$357 $223 $357 $223 
(1)Includes unrealized gains (losses) of $48 thousand and $(27) thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and $51 thousand and $(29) thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The realized/unrealized gains (losses) of equity contracts are recorded in Lending fees on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

The following table presents quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation of Level 3 fair value measurements as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021. The significant unobservable inputs presented in the table below are those that the Company considers significant to the fair value of the Level 3 assets. The Company considers unobservable inputs to be significant if, by their exclusion, the fair value of the Level 3 assets would be impacted by a predetermined percentage change.
($ in thousands)Fair Value
Measurements
(Level 3)
Valuation
Technique
Unobservable
Inputs
Range of Inputs
Weighted-
Average of Inputs (1)
June 30, 2022
Derivative assets:
Equity contracts$357 
Black-Scholes option pricing model
Equity volatility
46% — 70%.
61%
Liquidity discount47%47%
December 31, 2021
Derivative assets:
Equity contracts$215 
Black-Scholes option pricing model
Equity volatility
44% — 54%
49%
Liquidity discount47%47%
(1)Weighted-average of inputs is calculated based on the fair value of equity contracts as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis include certain individually evaluated loans held-for-investment, investments in qualified affordable housing partnerships, tax credit and other investments, OREO, loans held-for-sale, and other nonperforming assets. Nonrecurring fair value adjustments result from the impairment on certain individually evaluated loans held-for-investment and investments in qualified affordable housing partnerships, tax credit and other investments, from write-downs of OREO and other nonperforming assets, or from the application of lower of cost or fair value on loans held-for-sale.

Individually Evaluated Loans Held-for-Investment — Individually evaluated loans held-for-investment are classified as Level 3 assets. The following two methods are used to derive the fair value of individually evaluated loans held-for-investment:

Discounted cash flow valuation techniques that consist of developing an expected stream of cash flows over the life of the loans, and then calculating the present value of the loans by discounting the expected cash flows at a designated discount rate.
When the repayment of an individually evaluated loan is dependent on the sale of the collateral, the fair value of the loan is determined based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, which may take the form of real estate, inventory, equipment, contracts or guarantees. The fair value of the underlying collateral is generally based on third-party appraisals, or an internal valuation if a third-party appraisal is not required by regulations, or unavailable. An internal valuation utilizes one or more valuation techniques such as the income, market and/or cost approaches.

Investments in Qualified Affordable Housing Partnerships, Tax Credit and Other Investments, Net — The Company conducts due diligence on its investments in qualified affordable housing partnerships, tax credit and other investments prior to the initial investment date and through the placed-in-service date. After these investments are either acquired or placed into service, the Company continues its periodic monitoring process to ensure book values are realizable and that there is no significant tax credit recapture risk. This monitoring process includes the quarterly review of the financial statements, the annual review of tax returns of the investment entity, the annual review of the financial statements of the guarantor (if any) and a comparison of the actual performance of the investment against the financial projections prepared at the time when the investment was made. The Company assesses its tax credit and other investments for possible other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) on an annual basis or when events or circumstances suggest that the carrying amount of the investments may not be realizable. These circumstances can include, but are not limited to the following factors:

expected future cash flows that are less than the carrying amount of the investment;
changes in the economic, market or technological environment that could adversely affect the investee’s operations; and
other factors that raise doubt about the investee’s ability to continue as a going concern, such as negative cash flows from operations and the continuing prospects of the underlying operations of the investment.

All available information is considered in assessing whether a decline in value is other-than-temporary. Generally, none of the aforementioned factors are individually conclusive and the relative importance placed on individual facts may vary depending on the situation. In accordance with ASC 323-10-35-32, Investments — Equity Method and Joint Ventures, an impairment charge would only be recognized in earnings for a decline in value that is determined to be other-than-temporary.

Other Real Estate Owned — The Company’s OREO represents properties acquired through foreclosure, or through full or partial satisfaction of loans held-for-investment. These OREO properties are recorded at estimated fair value less the costs to sell at the time of foreclosure and at the lower of cost or estimated fair value less the costs to sell subsequent to acquisition. On a monthly basis, the current fair market value of each OREO property is reviewed to ensure that the current carrying value is appropriate. OREO properties are classified as Level 3.

Other Nonperforming Assets Other nonperforming assets are recorded at fair value upon the transfer from loans to foreclosed assets. Subsequently, foreclosed assets are recorded at the lower of carrying value or fair value. Fair value is based on independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral or management’s estimated recovery of the foreclosed asset. The Company records an impairment when the foreclosed asset’s fair value declines below its carrying value. The fair value measurement of other nonperforming assets is classified within one of the three levels in a valuation hierarchy based upon the observability of inputs to the valuation as of the measurement date.
The following tables present the carrying amounts of assets that were still held and had fair value adjustments measured on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021:
($ in thousands)Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
as of June 30, 2022
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Fair Value
Measurements
Loans held-for-investment:
Commercial:
Commercial and industrial (“C&I”)$— $— $55,015 $55,015 
Commercial real estate (“CRE”):
CRE— — 30,716 30,716 
Multifamily residential— — 1,055 1,055 
Total commercial  86,786 86,786 
Consumer:
Residential mortgage:
Home equity lines of credit (“HELOCs”)— — 1,167 1,167 
Total consumer  1,167 1,167 
Total loans held-for-investment$ $ $87,953 $87,953 
($ in thousands)Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
as of December 31, 2021
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Fair Value
Measurements
Loans held-for-investment:
Commercial:
C&I$— $— $102,349 $102,349 
CRE:
CRE— — 21,891 21,891 
Total commercial  124,240 124,240 
Consumer:
Residential mortgage:
HELOCs— — 2,744 2,744 
Total consumer  2,744 2,744 
Total loans held-for-investment$ $ $126,984 $126,984 
Other nonperforming assets$391 $ $ $391 
The following table presents the increase (decrease) in fair value of certain assets held at the end of the respective reporting periods, for which a nonrecurring fair value adjustment was recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021:
($ in thousands)Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
2022202120222021
Loans held-for-investment:
Commercial:
C&I$(6,054)$(6,462)$(14,740)$(15,530)
CRE:
CRE(533)(275)2,330 (7,336)
Multifamily residential(8)(8)(6)
Construction and land— (209)— (280)
Total commercial(6,595)(6,944)(12,418)(23,152)
Consumer:
Residential mortgage:
Single-family residential— — — (8)
HELOCs82 85 (23)
Other consumer— (2,491)— (2,491)
Total consumer82 (2,488)85 (2,522)
Total loans held-for-investment$(6,513)$(9,432)$(12,333)$(25,674)
Investments in tax credit and other investments, net$ $877 $ $877 
OREO$ $(910)$ $(910)
Other nonperforming assets$(6,861)$ $(6,861)$(3,890)

The following table presents the quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation of Level 3 fair value measurements that are measured on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021:
($ in thousands)Fair Value
Measurements
(Level 3)
Valuation
Techniques
Unobservable
Inputs
Range of 
Inputs
Weighted-
Average of Inputs (1)
June 30, 2022
Loans held-for-investment$36,889 Discounted cash flowsDiscount
4% — 6%
4%
$19,293 Fair value of collateralDiscount
15% — 77%
37%
$31,771 Fair value of propertySelling cost
8%
8%
December 31, 2021
Loans held-for-investment$64,919 Discounted cash flowsDiscount
4% — 15%
7%
$38,537 Fair value of collateralDiscount
15% — 75%
41%
$23,528 Fair value of propertySelling cost
8%
8%
(1)Weighted-average of inputs is based on the relative fair value of the respective assets as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021.
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following tables present the fair value estimates for financial instruments as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, excluding financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis as they are included in the tables presented elsewhere in this Note. The carrying amounts in the following tables are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet under the indicated captions, except for accrued interest receivable, restricted equity securities, at cost, and mortgage servicing rights that are included in Other assets, and accrued interest payable which is included in Accrued expenses and other liabilities. These financial assets and liabilities are measured on an amortized cost basis on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.
($ in thousands)June 30, 2022
Carrying
Amount
Level 1Level 2Level 3Estimated
Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$1,902,053 $1,902,053 $— $— $1,902,053 
Interest-bearing deposits with banks$712,709 $— $712,709 $— $712,709 
Resale agreements$1,422,794 $— $1,348,036 $— $1,348,036 
HTM debt securities$3,028,302 $486,521 $2,170,028 $— $2,656,549 
Restricted equity securities, at cost$77,962 $— $77,962 $— $77,962 
Loans held-for-sale$28,464 $— $28,464 $— $28,464 
Loans held-for-investment, net$45,938,806 $— $— $45,860,749 $45,860,749 
Mortgage servicing rights$5,909 $— $— $10,349 $10,349 
Accrued interest receivable$172,008 $— $172,008 $— $172,008 
Financial liabilities:
Demand, checking, savings and money market deposits$44,965,778 $— $44,965,778 $— $44,965,778 
Time deposits$9,377,576 $— $9,318,992 $— $9,318,992 
FHLB advances$174,776 $— $175,207 $— $175,207 
Repurchase agreements$611,785 $— $619,280 $— $619,280 
Long-term debt$147,801 $— $139,206 $— $139,206 
Accrued interest payable$9,596 $— $9,596 $— $9,596 
($ in thousands)December 31, 2021
Carrying
Amount
Level 1Level 2Level 3Estimated
Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$3,912,935 $3,912,935 $— $— $3,912,935 
Interest-bearing deposits with banks$736,492 $— $736,492 $— $736,492 
Resale agreements$2,353,503 $— $2,335,901 $— $2,335,901 
Restricted equity securities, at cost$77,434 $— $77,434 $— $77,434 
Loans held-for-sale$635 $— $635 $— $635 
Loans held-for-investment, net$41,152,202 $— $— $41,199,599 $41,199,599 
Mortgage servicing rights$5,706 $— $— $9,104 $9,104 
Accrued interest receivable$159,833 $— $159,833 $— $159,833 
Financial liabilities:
Demand, checking, savings and money market deposits$45,388,550 $— $45,388,550 $— $45,388,550 
Time deposits$7,961,982 $— $7,966,116 $— $7,966,116 
FHLB advances$249,331 $— $250,372 $— $250,372 
Repurchase agreements$300,000 $— $310,525 $— $310,525 
Long-term debt$147,658 $— $151,020 $— $151,020 
Accrued interest payable$11,435 $— $11,435 $— $11,435