Fair Value Measurement and Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair Value Determination

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or the price that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In determining the fair value of financial instruments, the Company uses various methods including market and income approaches. Based on these approaches, the Company utilizes certain assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated or generally unobservable. The Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy noted below is based on the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair value. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices available in active markets and the lowest priority to data lacking transparency. The fair value of the Company’s assets and liabilities is classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:



•	Level 1	—	Valuation is based on quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.
•	Level 2	—	Valuation is based on quoted prices for similar instruments traded in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments traded in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable and can be corroborated by market data.
•	Level 3	—	Valuation is based on significant unobservable inputs for determining the fair value of assets or liabilities. These significant unobservable inputs reflect assumptions that market participants may use in pricing the assets or liabilities.

The classification of assets and liabilities within the hierarchy is based on whether inputs to the valuation methodology used are observable or unobservable, and the significance of those inputs in the fair value measurement. The Company’s assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to their fair value measurements.

Level 3 Assets and Liabilities Valuation Process

The Company generally determines the fair value of Level 3 assets and liabilities by using internal valuation methodologies, which primarily include discounted cash flows techniques that require both observable and unobservable inputs. Unobservable inputs (such as volatility and liquidity discount) are generally derived from historic performance of similar instruments or determined from previous market trades in similar instruments. Such inputs can be derived from similar portfolios with known historic experience or recent trades where particular unobservable inputs may be implied. The Company compares each unobservable input to historic experience and other third-party data where available. The models developed under internal valuation methodologies are subject to review according to the Company’s risk management policies and procedures, which include model validation. Model validation includes review of supporting documentation and key components such as inputs, logic, processing components and output results. Validation also includes ensuring significant unobservable model inputs are appropriate given observable market transactions or other market data within the same or similar asset classes. The Company has ongoing monitoring procedures in place for Level 3 assets and liabilities that use internal valuation methodologies, which include but are not limited to the following:


•	review of valuation results against expectations, including review of significant or unusual value fluctuations; and


•	quarterly analysis related to market data, where available.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following section describes the valuation methodologies used by the Company to measure financial assets and liabilities on a recurring basis, as well as the general classification of these instruments pursuant to the fair value hierarchy.

Available-for-Sale Investment Securities — When available, the Company uses quoted market prices to determine the fair value of available-for-sale investment securities, which are classified as Level 1. Level 1 available-for-sale investment securities are primarily comprised of United States (“U.S.”) Treasury securities. The fair value of other available-for-sale investment securities is generally determined by independent external pricing service providers who have experience in valuing these securities or by the average quoted market prices obtained from independent external brokers. In obtaining such valuation information from third parties, the Company reviewed the methodologies used to develop the resulting fair value. The available-for-sale investment securities valued using such methods are classified as Level 2.

Equity Securities — Equity securities were comprised of mutual funds as of both September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. The Company uses Net Asset Value (“NAV”) information to determine the fair value of these equity securities. When NAV is available periodically and the equity securities can be put back to the transfer agents at the publicly available NAV, the fair value of the equity securities is classified as Level 1. When NAV is available periodically but the equity securities may not be readily marketable at its periodic NAV in the secondary market, the fair value of these equity securities is classified as Level 2.

Interest Rate Contracts — The Company enters into interest rate swap and option contracts with its borrowers to lock in attractive intermediate and long-term interest rates, resulting in the customer obtaining a synthetic fixed rate loan. To economically hedge against the interest rate risks in the products offered to its customers, the Company enters into mirrored offsetting interest rate contracts with third-party financial institutions. The Company also enters into interest rate swap contracts with institutional counterparties to hedge against certificates of deposit issued. This product allows the Company to lock in attractive floating rate funding. The fair value of the interest rate swaps is determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash payments (or receipts) and the discounted expected variable cash receipts (or payments). The fair value of the interest rate options, which consist of floors and caps, is determined using the market standard methodology of discounting the future expected cash receipts that would occur if variable interest rates fall below (rise above) the strike rate of the floors (caps). In addition, to comply with the provisions of ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, the Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements of its derivatives. The credit valuation adjustments associated with the Company’s derivatives utilize model-derived credit spreads are Level 3 inputs. As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of these interest rate contracts and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivative portfolios. As a result, the Company classifies these derivative instruments as Level 2 due to the observable nature of the significant inputs utilized.

Foreign Exchange Contracts — The Company enters into foreign exchange contracts to accommodate the business needs of its customers. For a majority of the foreign exchange contracts entered into with its customers, the Company entered into offsetting foreign exchange contracts with third-party financial institutions to manage its exposure. The Company also utilizes foreign exchange contracts that are not designated as hedging instruments to mitigate the economic effect of fluctuations in certain foreign currency on-balance sheet assets and liabilities, primarily foreign currency denominated deposits that it offers to its customers. The fair value is determined at each reporting period based on changes in the foreign exchange rates. These are over-the-counter contracts where quoted market prices are not readily available. Valuation is measured using conventional valuation methodologies with observable market data. Due to the short-term nature of the majority of these contracts, the counterparties’ credit risks are considered nominal and result in no adjustments to the valuation of the foreign exchange contracts. Due to the observable nature of the inputs used in deriving the fair value of these contracts, the valuation of foreign exchange contracts are classified as Level 2. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company entered into foreign currency swap contracts to hedge its net investment in its China subsidiary, East West Bank (China) Limited, a non-U.S. Dollar (“USD”) functional currency subsidiary in China. These foreign currency swap contracts were designated as net investment hedges. As of December 31, 2017, foreign exchange forward contracts were used to economically hedge the Company’s net investment in East West Bank (China) Limited. The fair value of foreign currency contracts is valued by comparing the contracted foreign exchange rate to the current market foreign exchange rate. Key inputs of the current market exchange rate include forward rates and the interest rate curves of the domestic and foreign currency. Interest rate forward curves are used to determine which forward rate pertains to a specific maturity. Due to the observable nature of the inputs used in deriving the estimated fair value, these instruments are classified as Level 2.

Credit Contracts — The Company may periodically enter into credit risk participation agreement (“RPA”) contracts to manage the credit exposure on interest rate contracts associated with syndicated loans. The Company may enter into protection sold or protection purchased RPAs with institutional counterparties. The fair value of RPAs is calculated by determining the total expected asset or liability exposure of the derivatives to the borrowers and applying the borrowers’ credit spread to that exposure. Total expected exposure incorporates both the current and potential future exposure of the derivatives, derived from using observable inputs, such as yield curves and volatilities. Accordingly, RPAs fall within Level 2.

Equity Contracts — The Company obtained equity warrants to purchase preferred and common stock of technology and life sciences companies, as part of the loan origination process. As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the warrants included on the Consolidated Financial Statements were from both public and private companies. The Company valued these warrants based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model. For equity warrants from public companies, the model uses the underlying stock price, stated strike price, warrant expiration date, risk-free interest rate based on a duration-matched U.S. Treasury rate and market-observable company-specific option volatility as inputs to value the warrants. Due to the observable nature of the inputs used in deriving the estimated fair value, warrants from public companies are classified as Level 2. For warrants from private companies, the model uses inputs such as the offering price observed in the most recent round of funding, stated strike price, warrant expiration date, risk-free interest rate based on duration-matched U.S. Treasury rate and option volatility. The model values are then adjusted for a general lack of liquidity due to the private nature of the underlying companies. Due to the unobservable nature of the option volatility and liquidity discount assumptions used in deriving the estimated fair value, warrants from private companies are classified as Level 3. On a quarterly basis, the changes in the fair value of warrants from private companies are reviewed for reasonableness, and a sensitivity analysis on the option volatility and liquidity discount assumptions is performed.

Commodity Contracts — In 2018, the Company entered into energy commodity contracts in the form of swaps and options with its commercial loan customers to allow them to hedge against the risk of fluctuation in energy commodity prices. The fair value of the commodity option contracts is determined using the Black’s model and assumptions that include expectations of future commodity price and volatility. The future commodity contract price is derived from observable inputs such as the market price of the commodity. Commodity swaps are structured as an exchange of fixed cash flows for floating cash flows. The fixed cash flows are predetermined based on the known volumes and fixed price as specified in the swap agreement. The floating cash flows are correlated with the change of forward commodity prices, which is derived from market corroborated futures settlement prices. The fair value of the commodity swaps is determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash payments (or receipts) and the discounted expected variable cash receipts (or payments) based on the market prices of the commodity. As a result, the Company classifies these derivative instruments as Level 2 due to the observable nature of the significant inputs utilized.

The following tables present financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:




($ in thousands)	Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis as of September 30, 2018
($ in thousands)	Fair Value Measurements		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Available-for-sale investment securities:
U.S. Treasury securities	$	603,926	$	603,926	$	—	$	—
U.S. government agency and U.S. government sponsored enterprise debt securities	228,656		—		228,656		—
U.S. government agency and U.S. government sponsored enterprise mortgage-backed securities:
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	365,070		—		365,070		—
Residential mortgage-backed securities	903,449		—		903,449		—
Municipal securities	72,824		—		72,824		—
Non-agency mortgage-backed securities:
Commercial mortgage-backed securities:
Investment grade	15,926		—		15,926		—
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
Investment grade	10,362		—		10,362		—
Corporate debt securities:
Investment grade	10,942		—		10,942		—
Foreign bonds:
Investment grade	452,843		—		452,843		—
Asset-backed securities:
Investment grade	12,512		—		12,512		—
Total available-for-sale investment securities	$	2,676,510	$	603,926	$	2,072,584	$	—

Investments in tax credit and other investments:
Equity securities with readily determinable fair value ⁽¹⁾	$	30,849	$	20,373	$	10,476	$	—
Total investments in tax credit and other investments	$	30,849	$	20,373	$	10,476	$	—

Derivative assets:
Interest rate contracts	$	72,618	$	—	$	72,618	$	—
Foreign exchange contracts	11,095		—		11,095		—
Credit contracts	1		—		1		—
Equity contracts	2,409		—		1,737		672
Commodity contracts	12,980		—		12,980		—
Total derivative assets	$	99,103	$	—	$	98,431	$	672

Derivative liabilities:
Interest rate contracts	$	114,658	$	—	$	114,658	$	—
Foreign exchange contracts	11,075		—		11,075		—
Credit contracts	57		—		57		—
Commodity contracts	7,912		—		7,912		—
Total derivative liabilities	$	133,702	$	—	$	133,702	$	—


(1)	Equity securities with readily determinable fair value were comprised of mutual funds as of September 30, 2018.




($ in thousands)	Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis as of December 31, 2017
($ in thousands)	Fair Value Measurements		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Available-for-sale investment securities:
U.S. Treasury securities	$	640,280	$	640,280	$	—	$	—
U.S. government agency and U.S. government sponsored enterprise debt securities	203,392		—		203,392		—
U.S. government agency and U.S. government sponsored enterprise mortgage-backed securities:
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	318,957		—		318,957		—
Residential mortgage-backed securities	1,190,271		—		1,190,271		—
Municipal securities	99,982		—		99,982		—
Non-agency mortgage-backed securities:
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
Investment grade	9,117		—		9,117		—
Corporate debt securities:
Investment grade	37,003		—		37,003		—
Foreign bonds:
Investment grade	486,408		—		486,408		—
Other securities	31,342		20,735		10,607		—
Total available-for-sale investment securities	$	3,016,752	$	661,015	$	2,355,737	$	—

Derivative assets:
Interest rate contracts	$	58,633	$	—	$	58,633	$	—
Foreign exchange contracts	5,840		—		5,840		—
Credit contracts	1		—		1		—
Equity contracts	1,672		—		993		679
Total derivative assets	$	66,146	$	—	$	65,467	$	679

Derivative liabilities:
Interest rate contracts	$	64,757	$	—	$	64,757	$	—
Foreign exchange contracts	10,170		—		10,170		—
Credit contracts	8		—		8		—
Total derivative liabilities	$	74,935	$	—	$	74,935	$	—

At each reporting period, all assets and liabilities for which the fair value measurement is based on significant unobservable inputs are classified as Level 3. As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the only assets measured on a recurring basis that were classified as Level 3 were equity warrants issued by private companies. The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of these warrants for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018:




($ in thousands)	Three Months Ended September 30, 2018			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
Equity warrants
Beginning balance	$	648		$	679
Total (losses) gains included in earnings⁽¹⁾	(7		)	161
Issuances	31			65
Settlements	—			(233		)
Ending balance	$	672		$	672


(1)	Includes unrealized (losses) gains of $(7) thousand and $224 thousand for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively. The realized/unrealized (losses) gains are included in Ancillary loan fees and other income on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

Transfers into or out of fair value hierarchy classifications are made if the significant inputs used in the financial models measuring the fair value of the assets and liabilities become observable or unobservable in the current marketplace. The Company’s policy, with respect to transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy, is to recognize transfers into and out of each level as of the end of the reporting period. There were no transfers of assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis into and out of Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.

The following table presents quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation of assets measured on a recurring basis classified as Level 3 as of September 30, 2018. The significant unobservable inputs presented in the table below are those that the Company considers significant to the fair value of the Level 3 assets. The Company considers unobservable inputs to be significant if, by their exclusion, the fair value of the Level 3 assets would be impacted by a predetermined percentage change.




($ in thousands)	Fair Value Measurements (Level 3)		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input(s)	Weighted- Average
Derivative assets:
Equity warrants	$	672	Black-Scholes option pricing model	Volatility	48%
				Liquidity discount	47%

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

From time to time, the Company may be required to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. The adjustments to fair value generally require the assets to be recorded at the lower of cost or fair value, or assessed for impairment.

Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis include certain non-PCI loans that are impaired, OREO and loans held-for-sale. These fair value adjustments result from impairment on certain non-PCI loans, application of fair value less costs to sell on OREO, or application of lower of cost or fair value on loans held-for-sale.

Non-PCI Impaired Loans — The Company typically adjusts the carrying amount of impaired loans when there is evidence of probable loss and when the expected fair value of the loan is less than its carrying amount. Impaired loans with specific reserves are classified as Level 3 assets. The following two methods are used to derive the fair value of impaired loans:


•	Discounted cash flows valuation techniques generally consist of developing an expected stream of cash flows over the life of the loans and then valuing the loans at the present value by discounting the expected cash flows at a designated discount rate.

•

A specific reserve is established for an impaired loan based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, which may take the form of real estate, inventory, equipment, contracts or guarantees. The fair value of the underlying collateral is generally based on third-party appraisals, or an internal evaluation if a third-party appraisal is not required by regulations, which utilize one or more valuation techniques such as income, market and/or cost approaches.

Other Real Estate Owned — The Company’s OREO represents properties acquired through foreclosure, or through full or partial satisfaction of loans held-for-investment. These OREO properties are recorded at estimated fair value less the costs to sell at the time of foreclosure or at the lower of cost or estimated fair value less the costs to sell subsequent to acquisition. On a monthly basis, the current fair market value of each OREO property is reviewed to ensure that the current carrying value is appropriate. OREO properties are classified as Level 3.

The following tables present the carrying amounts of assets included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet that had fair value changes measured on a nonrecurring basis as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:




	Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis as of September 30, 2018
($ in thousands)	Fair Value Measurements		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Non-PCI impaired loans:
Commercial lending:
Commercial and industrial (“C&I”)	$	37,453	$	—	$	—	$	37,453
Commercial real estate (“CRE”)	4,726		—		—		4,726
Consumer lending:
Single-family residential	2,567		—		—		2,567
Home equity lines of credit (“HELOCs”)	735		—		—		735
Total non-PCI impaired loans	$	45,481	$	—	$	—	$	45,481




	Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis as of December 31, 2017
($ in thousands)	Fair Value Measurements		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Non-PCI impaired loans:
Commercial lending:
C&I	$	31,404	$	—	$	—	$	31,404
CRE	2,667		—		—		2,667
Construction and land	3,973		—		—		3,973
Consumer lending:
Single-family residential	144		—		—		144
Total non-PCI impaired loans	$	38,188	$	—	$	—	$	38,188
OREO	$	9	$	—	$	—	$	9

The following table presents the total change in value of assets for which a fair value adjustment has been included on the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 and held as of those dates:




($ in thousands)	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
($ in thousands)	2018			2017			2018			2017
Non-PCI impaired loans:
Commercial lending:
C&I	$	(8,508	)	$	(16,954	)	$	(7,204	)	$	(17,648	)
CRE	50			6			61			81
Multifamily residential	—			(6		)	—			(112		)
Construction and land	—			—			—			(147		)
Consumer lending:
Single-family residential	—			3			15			161
HELOCs	(188		)	—			(262		)	25
Total non-PCI impaired loans nonrecurring fair value losses	$	(8,646	)	$	(16,951	)	$	(7,390	)	$	(17,640	)
OREO nonrecurring fair value losses	$	—		$	(285	)	$	—		$	(286	)

The following table presents the quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation of assets measured on a nonrecurring basis classified as Level 3 as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:




($ in thousands)	Fair Value Measurements (Level 3)		Valuation Technique(s)	Unobservable Input(s)	Range(s) of Input(s)	Weighted- Average
September 30, 2018
Non-PCI impaired loans	$	19,814	Discounted cash flows	Discount	4% — 7%	6%
	$	4,453	Fair value of property	Selling cost	8%	8%
	$	2,132	Fair value of collateral	Discount	100%	100%
	$	19,082	Fair value of collateral	Contract value	NM	NM
December 31, 2017
Non-PCI impaired loans	$	22,802	Discounted cash flows	Discount	4% — 10%	6%
	$	9,773	Fair value of property	Selling cost	8%	8%
	$	3,207	Fair value of collateral	Discount	20% — 32%	29%
	$	2,406	Fair value of collateral	Contract value	NM	NM
OREO	$	9	Fair value of property	Selling cost	8%	8%

NM — Not meaningful.

Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following tables present the fair value estimates for financial instruments as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, excluding financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis as they are included in the tables presented elsewhere in Note 4 — Fair Value Measurement and Fair Value of Financial Instruments. The carrying amounts in the following tables are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet under the indicated captions, except for accrued interest receivable and mortgage servicing rights that are included in Other assets, and accrued interest payable that is included in Accrued expenses and other liabilities. These financial assets and liabilities are measured at amortized cost basis on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. During the first quarter of 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2016-01 and has updated its valuation methods as necessary to conform to an “exit price” concept as required by ASU 2016-01.




($ in thousands)	September 30, 2018
($ in thousands)	Carrying Amount		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Estimated Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,218,787	$	2,218,787	$	—	$	—	$	2,218,787
Interest-bearing deposits with banks	$	400,900	$	—	$	400,900	$	—	$	400,900
Resale agreements ⁽¹⁾	$	1,035,000	$	—	$	1,002,552	$	—	$	1,002,552
Restricted equity securities, at cost	$	73,729	$	—	$	73,729	$	—	$	73,729
Loans held-for-sale	$	3,114	$	—	$	3,114	$	—	$	3,114
Loans held-for-investment, net	$	30,900,144	$	—	$	—	$	31,003,048	$	31,003,048
Mortgage servicing rights	$	7,861	$	—	$	—	$	12,077	$	12,077
Accrued interest receivable	$	136,932	$	—	$	136,932	$	—	$	136,932
Financial liabilities:
Demand, checking, savings and money market deposits	$	24,928,338	$	—	$	24,928,338	$	—	$	24,928,338
Time deposits	$	8,700,786	$	—	$	8,730,602	$	—	$	8,730,602
Short-term borrowings	$	56,411	$	—	$	56,411	$	—	$	56,411
FHLB advances	$	325,596	$	—	$	335,800	$	—	$	335,800
Repurchase agreements ⁽¹⁾	$	50,000	$	—	$	89,106	$	—	$	89,106
Long-term debt	$	156,770	$	—	$	162,566	$	—	$	162,566
Accrued interest payable	$	21,579	$	—	$	21,579	$	—	$	21,579


(1)	Resale and repurchase agreements are reported net pursuant to ASC 210-20-45-11, Balance Sheet Offsetting: Repurchase and Reverse Repurchase Agreements. As of September 30, 2018, $400.0 million out of $450.0 million of repurchase agreements were eligible for netting against resale agreements.




($ in thousands)	December 31, 2017
($ in thousands)	Carrying Amount		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Estimated Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,174,592	$	2,174,592	$	—	$	—	$	2,174,592
Interest-bearing deposits with banks	$	398,422	$	—	$	398,422	$	—	$	398,422
Resale agreements ⁽¹⁾	$	1,050,000	$	—	$	1,035,158	$	—	$	1,035,158
Restricted equity securities, at cost	$	73,521	$	—	$	73,521	$	—	$	73,521
Loans held-for-sale	$	85	$	—	$	85	$	—	$	85
Loans held-for-investment, net	$	28,688,590	$	—	$	—	$	28,956,349	$	28,956,349
Branch assets held-for-sale	$	91,318	$	5,143	$	10,970	$	78,132	$	94,245
Mortgage servicing rights	$	7,771	$	—	$	—	$	11,324	$	11,324
Accrued interest receivable	$	121,719	$	—	$	121,719	$	—	$	121,719
Financial liabilities:
Demand, checking, savings and money market deposits	$	25,974,314	$	—	$	25,974,314	$	—	$	25,974,314
Time deposits	$	5,640,749	$	—	$	5,626,855	$	—	$	5,626,855
Branch liability held-for-sale	$	605,111	$	—	$	—	$	643,937	$	643,937
FHLB advances	$	323,891	$	—	$	335,901	$	—	$	335,901
Repurchase agreements ⁽¹⁾	$	50,000	$	—	$	104,830	$	—	$	104,830
Long-term debt	$	171,577	$	—	$	171,673	$	—	$	171,673
Accrued interest payable	$	10,724	$	—	$	10,724	$	—	$	10,724


(1)	Resale and repurchase agreements are reported net pursuant to ASC 210-20-45-11, Balance Sheet Offsetting: Repurchase and Reverse Repurchase Agreements. As of December 31, 2017, $400.0 million out of $450.0 million of repurchase agreements were eligible for netting against resale agreements.