XML 94 R76.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.1
Contractual Commitments and Contingencies (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2018
Disclosure of other provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets [Abstract]  
Disclosure of Operating and Finance Leases
 
US Dollars
Figures in millions
2018

 
2017

 
2016

 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating leases
 
 
 
 
 
At 31 December 2018, the group was committed to making the following payments in respect of operating leases for, amongst others, the hire of plant and equipment and land and buildings. Certain contracts contain renewal options and escalation clauses for various periods of time.
 
 
 
 
 
Expiry:
 
 
 
 
 
- less than one year
102

 
45

 
47

- between one and three years
96

 
38

 
36

- thereafter
67

 
7

 
5

 
265

 
90

 
88


Operating lease charges included in profit before taxation amounts to $353m (2017: $247m; 2016: $198m).

Finance leases

The group has finance leases for plant and equipment and buildings. The leases for plant and equipment and buildings have terms of renewal but no purchase options. Future minimum lease payments under finance lease contracts together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments are as follows:
 
Minimum
payments

 
Present
value of
payments

 
Minimum
payments

 
Present
value of
payments

 
Minimum
payments

 
Present
value of
payments

US Dollars million
2018
 
2017
 
2016
Less than one year
12

 
7

 
14

 
8

 
12

 
6

Between one and three years
23

 
16

 
27

 
18

 
25

 
15

Between three and five years
17

 
12

 
24

 
17

 
26

 
18

More than five years
41

 
26

 
54

 
35

 
63

 
38

Total minimum lease payments
93

 
61

 
119

 
78

 
126

 
77

Amounts representing finance charges
(32
)
 

 
(41
)
 

 
(49
)
 

Present value of minimum lease payments
61

 
61

 
78

 
78

 
77

 
77

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
US Dollars
Figures in millions
 
 
 
 
 
 
2018

 
2017

 
2016

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Capital commitments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Acquisition of tangible assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contracted for
 
 
 
 
 
 
99

 
87

 
58

Not contracted for
 
 
 
 
 
 
792

 
113

 
587

Authorised by the directors
 
 
 
 
 
 
891

 
200

 
645

Allocated to:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Project capital
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- within one year
 
 
 
 
 
 
446

 
104

 
252

- thereafter
 
 
 
 
 
 
308

 

 
255

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
754

 
104

 
507

Stay-in-business capital
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- within one year
 
 
 
 
 
 
125

 
84

 
135

- thereafter
 
 
 
 
 
 
12

 
12

 
3

 
 
137

 
96

 
138

Share of underlying capital commitments of joint ventures included above
 
91

 
21

 
138

Purchase obligations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contracted for
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- within one year
 
 
 
 
 
 
305

 
274

 
605

- thereafter
 
 
 
 
 
 
658

 
424

 
269

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
963

 
698

 
874

Disclosure of Contingent Liabilities and Assets
Contingencies
 
US Dollars
Figures in millions
2018

 
2017

 
2016

Contingent liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
Litigation - Ghana(1)(2)
97

 
97

 
97

Litigation - North America (3)

 

 

Tax disputes - Brazil (4)
21

 
24

 
15

Tax dispute - AngloGold Ashanti Colombia S.A.(5)
144

 
150

 
141

Groundwater pollution(6)

 

 

Deep groundwater pollution - Africa(7)

 

 

 
262

 
271

 
253

Contingent liabilities

Litigation claims

(1) 
Litigation - On 11 October 2011, AngloGold Ashanti (Ghana) Limited (AGAG) terminated Mining and Building Contractors Limited’s (MBC) underground development agreement, construction on bulkheads agreement and diamond drilling agreement at Obuasi mine. The parties reached agreement on the terms of the separation and concluded a separation agreement on 8 November 2012. On 20 February 2014, AGAG was served with a demand issued by MBC claiming a total of $97m. In December 2015, the proceedings were stayed in the High Court pending arbitration. In February 2016, MBC submitted the matter to arbitration. On 12 July 2018, the Ghana Arbitration Centre notified AGAG that MBC had appointed an arbitrator and AGAG subsequently selected its own arbitrator.

(2) 
Litigation - AGAG received a summons on 2 April 2013 from Abdul Waliyu and 152 others in which the plaintiffs allege that they were or are residents of the Obuasi municipality or its suburbs and that their health has been adversely affected by emission and/or other environmental impacts arising in connection with the current and/or historical operations of the Pompora Treatment Plant (PTP), which was decommissioned in 2000. The plaintiffs’ alleged injuries include respiratory infections, skin diseases and certain cancers. The plaintiffs subsequently did not timely file their application for directions, but AGAG intends to allow some time to pass prior to applying to have the matter struck out for want of prosecution. On 24 February 2014, executive members of the PTP (AGAG) Smoke Effect Association (PASEA), sued AGAG by themselves and on behalf of their members (undisclosed number) on grounds similar to those discussed above, as well as economic hardships as a result of constant failure of their crops. This matter has been adjourned indefinitely. AGAG intends to allow some time to pass prior to applying to have the matter struck out for want of prosecution. In view of the limitation of current information for the accurate estimation of a liability, no reliable estimate can be made for AGAG’s obligation in either matter.

(3) 
Litigation - On 19 October 2017, Newmont Mining Co. filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against AngloGold Ashanti and certain related parties, alleging that AngloGold Ashanti and such parties did not provide Newmont with certain information material to its purchase of the Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company in 2015 during the negotiation- and-sale process.  AngloGold Ashanti believes the lawsuit is without merit and continues to vigorously defend against it. The matter is proceeding. In view of the limitation of current information for the accurate estimation of a liability, no reliable estimate can be made for the obligation.

Tax claims

(4) 
Tax disputes - AngloGold Ashanti Limited’s subsidiaries in Brazil are involved in various disputes with tax authorities. These disputes involve federal tax assessments including income tax, royalties, social contributions, VAT and annual property tax. Collectively, the possible amount involved is approximately $21m (2017: $24m, 2016: $15m). Management is of the opinion that these taxes are not payable.

(5) 
Tax dispute - In January 2013, AngloGold Ashanti Colombia S.A. (AGAC) received notice from the Colombian Tax Office (DIAN) that it disagreed with the company’s tax treatment of certain items in the 2010 and 2011 income and equity tax returns. On 23 October 2013, AGAC received the official assessments from the DIAN which established that an estimated additional tax of $20m (2017: $21m, 2016: $21m) will be payable if the tax returns are amended. Penalties and interest for the additional taxes may amount to $115m (2017: $129m, 2016: $120m).The Company believes that the DIAN has applied the tax legislation incorrectly. AGAC subsequently challenged the DIAN’s ruling by filing lawsuits in March 2015 and April 2015 before the Administrative Tribunal of Cundinamarca (the trial court for tax litigation). Closing arguments on the tax disputes were presented in February and June 2017 and judgement is pending. On 23 April 2018, the Administrative Tribunal denied AGAC’s arguments with respect to the 2011 income tax litigation. AGAC subsequently appealed this judgement to the Colombian Supreme Court.  A final judgement could take several years.  In addition, in January 2018 AGAC received notice from the DIAN that it also disagreed with AGAC’s 2013 income and equity tax returns on the same basis as the 2010 and 2011 returns, calculating additional tax along with penalties and interest of $9m. On 21 December 2018, AGAC filed an appeal before the Administrative Tribunal in respect of the 2013 year of assessment.


Other

(6) 
Groundwater pollution - AngloGold Ashanti has identified groundwater contamination plumes at certain of its operations, which have occurred primarily as a result of seepage from mine residue stockpiles. Numerous scientific, technical and legal studies have been undertaken to assist in determining the magnitude of the contamination and to find sustainable remediation solutions. The group has instituted processes to reduce future potential seepage and it has been demonstrated that Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA) by the existing environment will contribute to improvements in some instances. Furthermore, literature reviews, field trials and base line modelling techniques suggest, but have not yet proven, that the use of phyto-technologies can address the soil and groundwater contamination. Subject to the completion of trials and the technology being a proven remediation technique, no reliable estimate can be made for the obligation.

(7) 
Deep groundwater pollution - The group has identified potential water ingress and future pollution risk posed by deep groundwater in certain underground mines in Africa. Various studies have been undertaken by AngloGold Ashanti since 1999 to understand this potential risk.  In South Africa, due to the interconnected nature of mining operations, any proposed solution needs to be a combined one supported by all the mines located in these gold fields. As a result, the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (MPRDA) requires that the affected mining companies develop a Regional Mine Closure Strategy to be approved by the Department of Mineral Resources. In view of the limitation of current information for the accurate estimation of a liability, no reliable estimate can be made for the obligation.