XML 79 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Non-Financial Assets
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Non-Financial Assets
Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Non-Financial Assets

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The authoritative guidance for fair value measurements defines fair value for accounting purposes, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and provides disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurements. The guidance defines fair value as an exit price, which is the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid upon the transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The degree of judgment utilized in measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities generally correlates to the level of pricing observability. Assets and liabilities with readily available, actively quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices in active markets generally have more pricing observability and require less judgment in measuring fair value. Conversely, assets and liabilities that are rarely traded or not quoted have less pricing observability and are generally measured at fair value using valuation models that require more judgment. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency of the asset, liability or market and the nature of the asset or liability.

The Company has categorized its assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a three-level hierarchy in accordance with the authoritative guidance for fair value measurements. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities are generally categorized as Level 1; assets and liabilities measured at fair value using observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data for similar assets or liabilities are generally categorized as Level 2; and assets and liabilities measured at fair value using unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated by market data are generally categorized as Level 3. Assets and liabilities presented at fair value in the Company's consolidated balance sheets are generally categorized as follows:

Level 1:
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. The Company did not have any Level 1 assets or liabilities as of December 31, 2013 or December 31, 2012.

Level 2:
Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. The Company's Level 2 assets as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 included its cash equivalents, its short-term investments in obligations of the U.S. government and government agencies and its short-term investments in commercial paper.

Level 3:
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Such assets and liabilities may have values determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, and include instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. The Company did not have any Level 3 assets or liabilities as of December 31, 2013 or December 31, 2012, other than the non-financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis discussed below.

The following tables set forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the Company's assets and liabilities that were recorded at fair value as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands). As required by the guidance for fair value measurements, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Thus, assets and liabilities categorized as Level 3 may be measured at fair value using inputs that are observable (Levels 1 and 2) and unobservable (Level 3). Management's assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, which may affect the valuation of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

 
At Fair Value as of December 31, 2013
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market funds
$

 
$
12,144

 
$

 
$
12,144

Commercial paper

 
191,989

 

 
191,989

U.S. government or government agency securities

 
306,808

 

 
306,808

Total
$

 
$
510,941

 
$

 
$
510,941


 
At Fair Value as of December 31, 2012
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market funds
$

 
$
126,617

 
$

 
$
126,617

Commercial paper

 
82,346

 

 
82,346

U.S. government or government agency securities

 
135,861

 

 
135,861

Total
$

 
$
344,824

 
$

 
$
344,824



Assets in the tables above are reported on the consolidated balance sheets as components of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, other current assets and other assets.

Unrealized gains (losses) are presented in accumulated other comprehensive loss within stockholders' equity in the consolidated balance sheets. Realized gains (losses) are presented in other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments

As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, all of the Company's short-term investments were debt securities with contractual maturities of less than one year and were classified as available-for-sale. The fair value of the Company's cash equivalents, short-term investments in obligations of the U.S. government and government agencies and its short-term investments in commercial paper is determined using observable market-based inputs for similar assets, which primarily include yield curves and time-to-maturity factors. Such investments are therefore considered to be Level 2 items.

Available-for-sale securities were comprised as follows as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands):

 
As of December 31, 2013
 
Cost
 
Fair Value
Money market funds
$
12,144

 
$
12,144

Commercial paper
191,989

 
191,989

U.S. government or government agency securities
306,813

 
306,808

 
$
510,946

 
$
510,941


 
As of December 31, 2012
 
Cost
 
Fair Value
Money market funds
$
126,617

 
$
126,617

Commercial paper
82,345

 
82,346

U.S. government or government agency securities
135,848

 
135,861

 
$
344,810

 
$
344,824



Long-Term Debt

The Company reports its long-term debt obligations at amortized cost; however, for disclosure purposes, the Company is required to measure the fair value of outstanding debt on a recurring basis. The fair value of the Company's outstanding long-term debt is determined primarily by using quoted prices in active markets and was $3,906.0 million and $3,421.5 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company's debt was considered to be a Level 1 item for disclosure purposes.




Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, non-financial assets with a carrying value of $19.8 million and $13.6 million, respectively, accumulated in construction-in-progress had been reduced to a fair value of zero, resulting in an impairment charge of $19.8 million and $13.6 million, respectively.

The Company reviews its investments accounted for under the equity method for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investment may not be fully recoverable. The Merger Agreement with AT&T requires that the Company sell its investments in certain regional wireless service providers, which investments the Company has accounted for under the equity method. During the third quarter of 2013, the Company commenced its plan to sell those investments. As the investments met all of the criteria under the authoritative guidance to be classified as assets held for sale, the Company reclassified the investments to assets held for sale as of September 30, 2013. The Company was required to assess the fair value of the investments and determined that an other-than-temporary impairment existed as of December 31, 2013. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $9.2 million to reduce the carrying value of one of its equity method investments to its estimated fair value of zero as of December 31, 2013. In March 2014, the Company completed the sale of its investment in one of its equity method investees for a contingent fee of up to $5.0 million.

There were no other non-financial or financial assets that were measured and recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.