EX-95 9 btu_20120930xex95.htm EX-95 BTU_2012.09.30_EX.95


Exhibit 95
Mine Safety Disclosures
The following disclosures are provided pursuant to Section 1503 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) and Item 104 of Regulation S-K, which require certain disclosures by companies required to file periodic reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that operate coal mines regulated under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Mine Act). The disclosures reflect United States (U.S.) mining operations only, as the requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K do not apply to our mines operated outside the U.S. 
Mine Safety Information.  Whenever the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) believes that a violation of the Mine Act, any health or safety standard, or any regulation has occurred, it may issue a violation which describes the associated condition or practice and designates a timeframe within which the operator must abate the violation. In some situations, such as when MSHA believes that conditions pose a hazard to miners, MSHA may issue an order removing miners from the area of the mine affected by the condition until hazards are corrected. Whenever MSHA issues a citation or order, it generally proposes a civil penalty, or fine, as a result of the violation that the operator is ordered to pay. Citations and orders can be contested and appealed and, as part of that process, are often reduced in severity and amount, and are sometimes vacated. The number of citations, orders and proposed assessments vary depending on the size and type (underground or surface) of the company and mine. Since MSHA is a branch of the U.S. Department of Labor, its jurisdiction applies only to our U.S. mines. As such, the mine safety disclosures that follow contain no information for our Australian mines.
The tables that follow reflect citations and orders issued to us by MSHA during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, as reflected in our systems. The tables include only those mines that were issued orders or citations during the periods presented. Due to timing and other factors, our data may not agree with the mine data retrieval system maintained by MSHA. The proposed assessments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 were taken from the MSHA system as of November 6, 2012.
Additional information follows about MSHA references used in the tables is as follows:
•
Section 104 S&S Violations: The total number of violations received from MSHA under section 104(a) of the Mine Act that could significantly and substantially contribute to a serious injury if left unabated. In prior periodic reports, all violations received from MSHA under section 104(a) of the Mine Act, not limited to those that could significantly and substantially contribute to a serious injury if left unabated, were shown.
•
Section 104(b)Orders: The total number of orders issued by MSHA under section 104(b) of the Mine Act, which represents a failure to abate a citation under section 104(a) within the period of time prescribed by MSHA. This results in an order of immediate withdrawal from the area of the mine affected by the condition until MSHA determines that the violation has been abated.
•
Section 104(d)Citations and Orders: The total number of citations and orders issued by MSHA under section 104(d) of the Mine Act for unwarrantable failure to comply with mandatory health or safety standards.
•
Section 104(e) Notices: The total number of notices issued by MSHA under section 104(e) of the Mine Act for a pattern of violations that could contribute to mine health or safety hazards.
•
Section 110(b)(2)Violations: The total number of flagrant violations issued by MSHA under section 110(b)(2) of the Mine Act.
•
Section 107(a)Orders: The total number of orders issued by MSHA under section 107(a) of the Mine Act for situations in which MSHA determined an imminent danger existed.
•
Proposed MSHA Assessments: The total dollar value of proposed assessments from MSHA.
•
Fatalities: The total number of related fatalities.





Three Months Ended September 30, 2012
 
 
Section
104 S&S
Violations
 
Section
104(b)
Orders
 
Section
104(d)
Citations and
Orders
 
Section
104(e)
Potential Pattern
of Violations
 
Section
110(b)(2)
Violations
 
Section
107(a)
Orders
 
($)
Proposed
MSHA
Assessments
 
 
Mine (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fatalities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(In thousands)
 
 
Western U.S. Mining
 


 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 


 
 

Caballo
 
1

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
1.2

 
—

El Segundo
 
8

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
4.0

 
—

Kayenta
 
15

 
1

 
10

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
21.9

 
—

North Antelope Rochelle
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
0.5

 
—

Peabody Williams Fork Mining, LLC
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
0.1

 
—

Rawhide
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
0.2

 
—

Sage Creek
 
1

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Twentymile (Foidel Creek)
 
9

 
—

 
3

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
35.1

 
—

Midwestern U.S. Mining
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Air Quality (2)
 
26

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
176.5

 
—

Bear Run
 
6

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
5.9

 
—

Francisco Surface (3)
 
1

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
2.2

 
—

Francisco Underground
 
23

 
—

 
1

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
164.5

 
—

Gateway
 
11

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
69.7

 
—

Midwest Repair Facility (Columbia Maintenance Services)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
0.1

 
—

Viking - Corning Pit
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
0.2

 
—

Wildcat Hills Underground
 
5

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
39.9

 
—

Willow Lake Central Preparation Plant
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
0.1

 
—

Willow Lake Portal
 
74

 
1

 
6

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
688.0

 
—

(1) 
The definition of mine under section 3 of the Mine Act includes the mine, as well as other items used in, or to be used in, or resulting from, the work of extracting coal, such as land, structures, facilities, equipment, machines, tools and coal preparation facilities. Also, there are instances where the mine name per the MSHA system differs from the mine name utilized by us. Where applicable, we have parenthetically listed the name of the mine per the MSHA system. Also, all mines are listed alphabetically within each of our U.S. mining segments.
(2) 
Mine classified in discontinued operation as of September 30, 2012.
(3) 
Mine was closed as of September 30, 2012.





Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
 
 
Section
104 S&S
Violations
 
Section
104(b)
Orders
 
Section
104(d)
Citations and
Orders
 
Section
104(e)
Potential Pattern
of Violations
 
Section
110(b)(2)
Violations
 
Section
107(a)
Orders
 
($)
Proposed
MSHA
Assessments
 
 
Mine (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fatalities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(In thousands)
 
 
Western U.S. Mining
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 

Caballo
 
3

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
1

 
6.1

 
—

El Segundo
 
11

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
12.0

 
—

Kayenta
 
24

 
1

 
13

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
78.1

 
—

Lee Ranch
 
9

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
13.5

 
—

North Antelope Rochelle
 
5

 
—

 
1

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
56.6

 
—

Peabody Williams Fork Mining, LLC
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
0.1

 
—

Rawhide
 
10

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
21.3

 
—

Sage Creek
 
4

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
1.5

 
—

Twentymile (Foidel Creek)
 
44

 
—

 
3

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
213.4

 
—

Midwestern U.S. Mining
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Air Quality (2)
 
90

 
—

 
2

 
—

 
—

 
1

 
910.1

 
—

Bear Run
 
9

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
12.8

 
—

Cottage Grove (Wildcat Hills-Cottage Grove Pit)
 
3

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
2.7

 
—

Francisco Surface (3)
 
1

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
2.7

 
—

Francisco Underground
 
76

 
—

 
1

 
—

 
—

 
1

 
455.1

 
—

Gateway
 
43

 
—

 
1

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
348.5

 
—

Gateway Preparation Plant
 
2

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
1.6

 
—

Midwest Repair Facility (Columbia Maintenance Services)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
0.1

 
—

Somerville Central
 
1

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
1.9

 
—

Viking - Corning Pit
 
7

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
18.7

 
—

Wild Boar
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
0.1

 
—

Wildcat Hills Underground
 
22

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
144.6

 
—

Willow Lake Central Preparation Plant
 
3

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
1.4

 
—

Willow Lake Portal
 
143

 
1

 
6

 
—

 
—

 
1

 
1,563.0

 
—

(1) 
The definition of mine under section 3 of the Mine Act includes the mine, as well as other items used in, or to be used in, or resulting from, the work of extracting coal, such as land, structures, facilities, equipment, machines, tools and coal preparation facilities. Also, there are instances where the mine name per the MSHA system differs from the mine name utilized by us. Where applicable, we have parenthetically listed the name of the mine per the MSHA system. Also, all mines are listed alphabetically within each of our U.S. mining segments.
(2) 
Mine classified in discontinued operation as of September 30, 2012.
(3) 
Mine was closed as of September 30, 2012.

   




Pending Legal Actions. The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (the Commission) is an independent adjudicative agency that provides administrative trial and appellate review of legal disputes arising under the Mine Act. These cases may involve, among other questions, challenges by operators to citations, orders and penalties they have received from MSHA, or complaints of discrimination by miners under section 105 of the Mine Act. The following is a brief description of the types of legal actions that may be brought before the Commission.
•
Contests of Citations and Orders: A contest proceeding may be filed with the Commission by operators, miners or miners’ representatives to challenge the issuance of a citation or order issued by MSHA.
•
Contests of Proposed Penalties (Petitions for Assessment of Penalties): A contest of a proposed penalty is an administrative proceeding before the Commission challenging a civil penalty that MSHA has proposed for the violation.
•
Complaints for Compensation: A complaint for compensation may be filed with the Commission by miners entitled to compensation when a mine is closed by certain withdrawal orders issued by MSHA. The purpose of the proceeding is to determine the amount of compensation, if any, due miners idled by the orders.
•
Complaints of Discharge, Discrimination or Interference: A discrimination proceeding is a case that involves a miner’s allegation that he or she has suffered a wrong by the operator because he or she engaged in some type of activity protected under the Mine Act, such as making a safety complaint.
•
Temporary Reinstatement Proceedings: Temporary reinstatement proceedings involve cases in which a miner has filed a complaint with MSHA stating he or she has suffered discrimination and the miner has lost his or her position.
•
Emergency Response Plan (ERP) Dispute Proceedings: ERP dispute proceedings are cases brought before the Commission when an operator is issued a citation because it has not agreed to include a certain provision in its ERP.
The table that follows presents information by mine regarding pending legal actions before the Commission at September 30, 2012. Each legal action is assigned a docket number by the Commission and may have as its subject matter one or more citations, orders, penalties or complaints.
 
 
Pending Legal Actions
 
Legal Actions Initiated During the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012
 
Legal Actions Resolved During the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012
 
 
Number of Pending Legal Actions as of September 30, 2012
 
Pre-Penalty Contests of Citations/Orders
 
Contests of Penalty Assessment
 
Complaints of Discharge, Discrimination or Interference
 
 
Mine(1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Western U.S. Mining
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Kayenta
 
10
 
4
 
6
 
—
 
1
 
—
Lee Ranch
 
1
 
—
 
1
 
—
 
1
 
—
North Antelope Rochelle
 
3
 
—
 
3
 
—
 
—
 
2
Rawhide
 
1
 
—
 
1
 
—
 
1
 
—
Sage Creek
 
1
 
—
 
1
 
—
 
1
 
—
Twentymile (Foidel Creek)
 
32
 
4
 
28
 
—
 
7
 
—
Midwestern U.S. Mining
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Air Quality (2)
 
23
 
—
 
23
 
—
 
—
 
—
Air Quality South Wash Plant (2)
 
1
 
—
 
1
 
—
 
—
 
—
Francisco Surface (3)
 
2
 
—
 
2
 
—
 
—
 
—
Francisco Underground
 
8
 
1
 
7
 
—
 
—
 
—
Gateway
 
8
 
3
 
5
 
—
 
—
 
11
Midwest Repair Facility (Columbia Maintenance Services)
 
3
 
2
 
1
 
—
 
—
 
—
Somerville Central
 
1
 
—
 
1
 
—
 
—
 
1
Vermilion Grove (Riola Complex Vermilion Grove Portal) (3)
 
3
 
—
 
3
 
—
 
—
 
—
Wildcat Hills Underground
 
3
 
—
 
3
 
—
 
—
 
—
Willow Lake Portal
 
83
 
45
 
36
 
2
 
3
 
—
(1) 
The definition of mine under section 3 of the Mine Act includes the mine, as well as other items used in, or to be used in, or resulting from, the work of extracting coal, such as land, structures, facilities, equipment, machines, tools and coal preparation facilities. Also, there are instances where the mine name per the MSHA system differs from the mine name utilized by us. Where applicable, we have parenthetically listed the name of the mine per the MSHA system. Also, all mines are listed alphabetically within each of our U.S. mining segments.
(2) 
Mine classified in discontinued operation as of September 30, 2012.
(3) 
Mine was closed as of September 30, 2012.