CC Filed by Filing Services Canada Inc. 403-717-3898

(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the Registrant’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report: 64,226,593 common shares as at December 31, 2008

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow:

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

This Annual Report on Form 20-F has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the securities laws in effect in Canada, which differ from the requirements of United States securities laws. The terms “mineral reserve”, “proven mineral reserve” and “probable mineral reserve” are Canadian mining terms as defined in accordance with Canadian National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (the “CIM”) - CIM Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, adopted by the CIM Council, as amended. These definitions differ from the definitions in United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Industry Guide 7 under the United States Securities Act of 1993, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Under SEC Industry Guide 7 standards, a “final” or “bankable” feasibility study is required to report reserves, the three-year historical average price is used in any reserve or cash flow analysis to designate reserves and the primary environmental analysis or report must be filed with the appropriate governmental authority.

In addition, the terms “mineral resource”, “measured mineral resource”, “indicated mineral resource” and “inferred mineral resource” are defined in and required to be disclosed by NI 43-101; however, these terms are not defined terms under SEC Industry Guide 7 and are normally not permitted to be used in reports and registration statements filed with the SEC. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves. “Inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource exists or is economically or legally mineable. Disclosure of “contained ounces” in a resource is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations; however, the SEC normally only permits issuers to report mineralization that does not constitute “reserves” by SEC Industry Guide 7 standards as in place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures.

Accordingly, information contained in this Annual Report on Form 20-F and the documents incorporated by reference herein contain descriptions of our mineral deposits that may not be comparable to similar information made public by U.S. companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements under the United States federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.

In this Annual Report on Form 20-F a combination of Imperial and metric measures are used. Conversions from Imperial measure to metric and from metric to Imperial are provided below:

This Annual Report on Form 20-F and the exhibits attached hereto contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements concern the Company’s anticipated results and developments in the Company’s operations in future periods, planned exploration and development of its properties, plans related to its business and other matters that may occur in the future. These statements relate to analyses and other information that are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and assumptions of management. Statements concerning reserves and mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that will be encountered if the property is developed, and in the case of mineral reserves, such statements reflect the conclusion based on certain assumptions that the mineral deposit can be economically exploited. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, “plans”, “estimates” or “intends”, or stating that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” (or the negative and grammatical variations of any of these terms and similar expressions) be taken, occur or be achieved,) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation:

risks related to differences between U.S. and Canadian practices for reporting resources and reserves

risks related to our mineral properties being subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers, or claims and other defects in title;

risks related to likely Passive Foreign Investor Company (“PFIC”) status has possible adverse tax consequences for U.S. investors

This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect our forward-looking statements. Some of the important risks and uncertainties that could affect forward-looking statements are described further in the sections entitled “Risk Factors”, “Information on the Company” and “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and in the exhibits attached to this Annual Report on Form 20-F. Should one or more of these risks and uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. The Company’s forward-looking statements are based on beliefs, expectations and opinions of management on the date the statements are made and the Company does not assume any obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances or management’s beliefs, expectations or opinions change, except as required by law. For the reasons set forth above, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

Freegold Ventures Limited (“Freegold” or the “Company”) has a limited history of operations and has not generated any operating revenues in the past. The following table sets forth, for the periods and the dates indicated, selected financial and operating data for the Company. This information should be read in conjunction with the Company's Financial Statements and Notes thereto and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included elsewhere herein. The selected financial data provided below are not necessarily indicative of the future results of operations or financial performance of the Company. To date the Company has not paid any dividends on the shares and it does not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.

The Financial Statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada ("Canadian GAAP"). There are material differences between Canadian GAAP and the accounting principles that are generally accepted in the United States ("US GAAP") as applied to the Company. For a comparison of these differences, refer to footnote number 12 to the financial statements.

Since June 1, 1970, the Government of Canada adopted a floating exchange rate to determine the value of the Canadian dollar as compared to the US dollar. On March 30, 2009, the exchange rate in effect for Canadian dollars exchanged for US dollars, expressed in terms of Canadian dollars was $1.2590. This exchange rate is based on the noon buying rates of the Bank of Canada, as obtained from the website www.bankofcanada.ca.

For the past five fiscal years ended December 31, 2008, and for the three month period between December 1, 2008, and February 28, 2009, the following exchange rates were in effect for Canadian dollars exchanged for US dollars, calculated in the same manner as above:

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

An investment in our common shares is highly speculative and subject to a number of known and unknown risks. Only those persons who can bear the risk of the entire loss of their investment should purchase our securities. An investor should carefully consider the risks described below and the other information that we file with the SEC and with Canadian securities regulators before investing in our common shares. The risks described below are not the only ones faced. Additional risks that we are not currently aware of or that we currently believe are immaterial may become important factors that affect our business. If any of these risks occur, operating results and financial conditions could be seriously harmed, the market price of our common shares could decline and the investor may lose all of their investment. The risk factors set forth below and elsewhere in this Annual Report, and the risks discussed in our other filings with the SEC and Canadian securities regulators may have a significant impact on our business, operating results and financial condition and could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements”.

In addition to other information in this Annual Report, you should carefully consider the following risk factors in evaluating our business.

As a result of general market conditions and as a result of the poor performance of our gravity concentration plant we currently do not have sufficient funds to meet our current obligations. We currently have no external sources of liquidity and all additional funding required for the foreseeable future will have to be obtained by either sale of mineral properties or sale of securities. Should we elect to satisfy our cash commitment by way of private placement, public offering or sales of mineral properties, there can be no assurance that our efforts to raise such funding will be successful, or achieved on terms favourable to us or our shareholders. Such financings, to the extent that they are available may result in substantial dilution to our existing shareholders. Failure to obtain additional financing on a timely basis could cause us to forfeit all or a portion of our interest in the assets or the rights now held by us and our ability to continue as a going concern. As described in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements, our consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the assumption that we will continue as a going concern, meaning that we will continue in operation for the foreseeable future and we will be able to realize assets and discharge our liabilities in the ordinary course of business. There can be no assurance that we will be able to continue as a going concern.

None of the Company's properties have commenced commercial production and the Company has no history of earnings or cash flow from its operations other than from a limited bulk sampling program. As a result there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to develop and generate any of its property profitably or that its activities will generate positive cash flow. The only present source of funds available to the Company is through the sale of its common shares. Even if the results of exploration are encouraging, the Company may not have sufficient funds to conduct the further exploration that may be necessary to determine whether or not a

commercially mineable deposit exists on any property. While the Company may generate additional working capital through the operation, sale or possible joint venture development of its properties, there is no assurance that any such funds will be available for operations. – this seems a rehash of the above paragraph – why is it here?

Our current operating funds are less than necessary to complete exploration of our mineral claims, and therefore we will need to obtain additional financing in order to complete our business plan. As of December 31, 2008 we had $7,335 in cash on hand. Cash on hand at the date of filing this Annual Report is approximately $1,500.

Our business plan calls for significant expenses in connection with the exploration of our mineral claims. We will require additional financing in order to complete these activities and to meet our current debt obligations. In addition, we will require additional financing to sustain our business operations if we are not successful in earning revenues once exploration is complete. We do not currently have any arrangements for financing and we can provide no assurance to investors that we will be able to find such financing if required.

We have incurred losses in our business operations since inception, and we expect that we will continue to incur additional losses for the foreseeable future. Since our incorporation on July 22, 1985 to December 31, 2008, we incurred losses determined under US GAAP totaling Cdn $ 60,787,240. Very few junior mining resource companies ever become profitable. Failure to achieve and maintain profitability may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. There can be no assurance that we will achieve profitability in the future or at all.

We have not identified any commercially viable mineral deposits. We have not commenced development or commercial production on any of our properties. We have no history of earnings or cash flow from operations. We do not have a line of credit and our only present source of funds available may be through the sale of our equity shares, or assets. Even if the results of exploration are encouraging, we may not have the ability to raise sufficient funds to conduct further explorations to determine whether a commercially mineable deposit exists on any of our properties. While additional working capital may be generated through the issuance of equity or debt, the sale of properties or possible joint venturing of the properties, we cannot assure you that any such funds will be available for operations on acceptable terms, if at all.

In addition, should we be unable to continue as a going concern, realization of assets and settlement of liabilities in other than the normal course of business may be at amounts significantly different from those contained in our financial statements.

We have no production history from our mineral properties other than from a LIMITED bulk sampling program.

Although we produced 400 ounces of gold from our Golden Summit Project, this was done as a bulk sampling program and NOT as Commercial Production. We have no history of producing metals from any of our properties as each of our properties is in the exploration stage. Advancing properties from exploration into the development stage requires significant capital and time, and successful commercial production from a property, if any, will be subject to completing positive feasibility studies, permitting and construction of the mine, processing plants and roads and other related works and infrastructure. As a result, we are subject to all the risks associated with developing and establishing new mining operations and business enterprises including:

Completion of feasibility studies to define reserves and commercial viability, including the ability to find sufficient mineral reserves to support a commercial mining operation;

The timing and cost, which can be considerable, of further exploration, preparing feasibility studies, permitting and construction of infrastructure, mining and processing facilities;

The availability and costs of drill equipment, qualified exploration personnel, skilled and reliable labour and mining and processing equipment, if required;

The availability and cost of appropriate smelting and/or refining arrangements, if required;

Compliance with environmental and other governmental approval and permit requirements;

The availability of funds to finance exploration, development and construction activities, as warranted;

Potential opposition from non-governmental organizations, environmental groups, local groups or local inhabitants which may delay or prevent development activities; and

Potential increases in exploration, construction and operating costs due to changes in the cost of fuel, power, materials and supplies.

The costs, timing and complexities of exploration, development and construction activities may be increased by the location of our properties and demand by other mineral exploration and mining companies. It is common in exploration programs to experience unexpected problems and delays during drill programs and, if warranted, development, construction and mine start-up. Accordingly, our activities may not result in profitable mining operations and we may not succeed in establishing mining operations or profitability producing metals at any of our properties.

We anticipate that costs at our projects that we may explore or develop, will frequently be subject to variation from one year to the next due to a number of factors, such as changing ore grade, metallurgy and revisions to mine plans, if any, in response to the physical shape and location of the ore body. In addition, costs are affected by the price of commodities such as fuel, rubber and electricity. Such commodities are at times subject to volatile price movements, including increases that could make production at certain operations less profitable. A material increase in costs at any significant location could have a significant effect on our profitability.

A shortage of equipment and supplies could adversely affect our ability to operate our business.

We are dependent on various supplies and equipment to carry out our mining exploration and, if warranted, development operations. The shortage of such supplies, equipment and parts could have a material adverse effect on our ability to carry out our operations and therefore limit or increase the cost of production.

Our operations are subject to the inherent risk associated with mineral exploration activities.

Mineral exploration activities and, if warranted, development activities generally involve a high degree of risk, which even a combination of experience, knowledge and careful evaluation may not be able to overcome. Environmental hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected geological formations, fires, power outages, labour disruptions, flooding, explosions, cave-ins, land-slides and the inability to obtain suitable or adequate machinery, equipment or labour are other risks involved in the operation of mines and the conduct of exploration programs. Operations and activities in which we have a direct or indirect interest will be subject to all the hazards and risks normally incidental to exploration, development and production of precious and base metals, any of which could result in work stoppages, damage to or destruction of mines, if any, and other producing facilities, damage to life and property, environmental damage and possible legal liability for any or all damage. We plan to obtain insurance, in amounts that we consider to be adequate, to protect ourselves against certain of these mining risks once we commence mining operations. However, we may become subject to liability for certain hazards which we cannot insure against or which we may elect not to insure against because of premium costs or other reasons. The payment of such liabilities may have a material, adverse effect on our financial position. At the present time, we do not conduct any mining operations and none of our properties are under development, and, therefore, we do not carry insurance to protect us against certain inherent risks associated with mining. Reclamation requirements vary depending on the location and the managing regulatory agency, but they are similar in that they aim to minimize long

term effects of exploration and mining disturbance by requiring the operating company to control possible deleterious effluents and to re-establish to some degree pre-disturbance landforms and vegetation.

Mineral exploration involves a high degree of risk against which we are not currently insured.

The Company’s exploration activities are subject to the hazards and risks normally incident to the exploration for and development and production of precious minerals, any of which could result in damage for which the Company may be held responsible. Hazards such as unusual or unexpected weather, rock formations, formation pressures, fires, power outages, landslides, flooding cave-ins or other adverse conditions such as the inability to obtain suitable or adequate machinery, equipment or labor may be encountered in the drilling and removal of material. While the Company may obtain insurance against certain risks in such amounts as we consider adequate, the nature of these risks is such that liabilities could exceed policy limits or could be excluded from coverage. There are also risks against which the Company cannot insure or against which we may decide not to insure.

It is not always possible to fully insure against such risks and we may decide to forego insuring against such risks as a result of high premiums or other reasons. Should such liabilities arise, they could reduce or eliminate any future profitability and result in increasing costs and a decline in the value of our common shares. We do not currently maintain insurance against environmental risks relating to our mineral property interests, though we have obtained third party liability insurance, to counter the effects of these risks.

All of our properties are in the exploration stage and are highly speculative in nature, which means there can be no assurance that our programs will result in the discovery of any economically feasible mineral deposit.

At present, none of our properties have a known body of ore and all our proposed exploration programs are an exploratory search for ore. We will only develop our mineral properties if we obtain satisfactory results from our exploration programs. The development of gold and other mineral properties is affected by many factors, including the cost of operations, variations in the grade of ore mined, fluctuations in metal markets, costs of processing equipment and other factors such as government regulations, including regulations relating to royalties, allowable production, importing and exporting of minerals and environmental protection. We have relied and may continue to rely upon consultants and others for exploration expertise. Substantial expenditures are required to establish reserves through drilling, to develop metallurgical processes to extract the metal from the ore and, in the case of new properties, to develop the mining and processing facilities and infrastructure at any site chosen for mining. We cannot assure you that any mineral deposits will be discovered in sufficient quantities to justify commercial operations or that funds required for development can be obtained on a timely basis. Depending on the price of gold other minerals produced, if any, we may determine that it is impractical to commence or, if commenced, continue commercial production.

The marketability of any minerals acquired or discovered may be affected by numerous factors which are beyond our control and which cannot be accurately predicted, such as market fluctuations, the global marketing conditions for uranium and other metals, the proximity and capacity of milling facilities, mineral markets and processing equipment, and such other factors as government regulations, including regulations relating to royalties, allowable production, importing and exporting minerals and environmental protection. Our properties are located in the Alaska and Idaho in the United States. This jurisdiction impose certain requirements and obligations on the owners of exploratory properties which includes, among other things, certain application and permit requirements, certain limitations on mining and exploration activities, periodic reporting requirements, limited terms and certain fees and royalty payments.

The business of exploration for minerals and mining involves a high degree of risk such as unusual or unexpected geological formations and the inability to obtain suitable or adequate machinery, equipment or labour and is highly speculative in nature. Few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into commercially viable mining operations. At present, our existing properties have no known significant body

of commercial ore. Most exploration projects do not result in the discovery of commercially mineable deposits of ore. The occurrence of unsuccessful exploration efforts may eventually lead to us needing to cease operations.

The success of commodity exploration is determined in part by the following factors:

Substantial expenditures are required for us to establish proven and probable ore reserves through drilling and analysis, to develop metallurgical processes, to extract the metal from the ore and, in the case of new properties, to develop the mining and processing facilities and infrastructure at any site chosen for mining. In making the determination as to the commercial viability of a mineral deposit, a number of factors are considered, which include, without limitation, the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade, and proximity to infrastructure; metal prices, which fluctuate widely; and government regulations, including, without limitation, regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, and use importing and exporting or minerals and environmental protection.

Although substantial benefits may be derived from the discovery of a major mineral deposit, no assurance can be given that we will discover minerals in sufficient quantities to justify commercial operations or that we can obtain the funds required for development on a timely basis.

We may invest significant capital and resources in exploration activities and abandon such investments if we are unable to identify commercially exploitable mineral reserves. The decision to abandon a project may have an adverse effect on the market value of our securities and the ability to raise future financing.

There are no known economic reserves on any of the Company’s properties at this time.

Calculations of mineral reserves and of mineralized material are estimates only, subject to uncertainty due to factors including metal prices, inherent variability of the ore, and recoverability of metal in the mining process.

There is a degree of uncertainty attributable to the calculation of reserves and corresponding grades dedicated to future production. Until mineral reserves are actually mined and processed, the quantity of ore and grades must be considered as an estimate only. In addition, the quantity of mineral reserves and ore may vary depending on metal prices. Estimates of mineral resources under Canadian guidelines are subject to uncertainty as well. The estimating of mineral reserves and mineral resources under Canadian guidelines is a subjective process and the accuracy of such estimates is a function of the quantity and quality of available data and the assumptions used and judgments made in interpreting engineering and geological information. There is significant uncertainty in any reserve or estimate of mineral resources under Canadian guidelines, and the actual deposits encountered and the economic viability of mining a deposit may differ materially from our estimates. Estimated mineral reserves or mineral resources under Canadian guidelines may have to be recalculated based on changes in metal prices, further exploration or development activity or actual production experience. This could materially and adversely affect estimates of the volume or grade of mineralization, estimated recovery rates or other important factors that influence estimates of mineral reserves or mineral resources under Canadian guidelines. Any material change in the quantity of mineral reserves, mineralization, grade or stripping ratio may affect the economic viability of our properties. In addition, there can be no assurance that metal recoveries in small-scale laboratory tests will be duplicated in larger scale tests under on-site conditions or during production.

The Company’s reserve and resource estimates are not directly comparable to those made in filings subject to SEC reporting and disclosure requirements, as the Company generally reports reserves and resources in accordance with Canadian practices. These practices are different from those used to report reserve and resource estimates in reports and other materials filed with the SEC. It is Canadian practice to report measured, indicated and inferred resources, which are not permitted in disclosure filed with the SEC by United States issuers. In the United States, mineralization may not be classified as a "reserve" unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made. United States investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of measured or indicated resources will ever be converted into reserves.

Further, "inferred resources" have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and as to whether they can be mined legally or economically. Disclosure of "contained ounces" is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations; however, the SEC permits issuers to report "resources" only as in-place tonnage and grade without reference to unit of metal measures.

Accordingly, information concerning descriptions of mineralization, reserves and resources contained in this Annual Report, or in the documents incorporated herein by reference, may not be comparable to information made public by United States companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the SEC.

The prices of precious metals fluctuate and directly impact on our business activities.

Our business activities are significantly affected by the prices of precious metals on international markets. The price of minerals affects our ability to raise financing, the commercial feasibility of our properties, the future profitability of our properties should they be developed and our future business prospects. The prices of precious metals fluctuate widely and are affected by numerous factors beyond our control, including expectations with respect to the rate of inflation, the strength of the U.S. dollar and of other currencies, interest rates, and global or regional political or economic crisis.

Our business is affected by market fluctuations in the prices of the minerals sought, which are highly volatile. Depending on the price of such minerals, we may determine that it is impractical to continue our exploration activities or, if warranted, to commence commercial development or production of our properties, if a mineral deposit is identified.

Precious metal prices may fluctuate widely and are affected by numerous industry factors, such as demand for precious metals, forward selling by producers, central bank sales and purchases of gold and production and cost levels in major mineral-producing regions. Moreover, mineral prices are also affected by macro-economic factors that are beyond our control, including international economic and political trends, expectations of inflation, currency exchange fluctuations (specifically, the Canadian dollar relative to other currencies), interest rates and global or regional consumption patterns, speculative activities and increased production due to improved mining and production methods. We cannot assure you that the price of such minerals will remain stable or that such prices will be at a level that will prove feasible to continue our exploration activities, or, if applicable, begin development of our properties.

The current demand for and supply of precious metals affects their respective prices, but not necessarily in the same manner as current demand and supply affect the prices of other commodities. If prices of such minerals should decline for a sustained period, we could determine that it is not economically feasible to continue our exploration activities and such decision will have a material adverse affect on our business and results of operations.

The loss of key management personnel may adversely affect our business and results of operations.

The success of our operations and activities is dependent to a significant extent on the efforts and abilities of our management, and we do not maintain key employee insurance for any of our management team. Investors must be willing to rely to a significant extent on their discretion and judgment.

Certain members of our board also serve as directors of other companies involved in natural resource exploration and development. Consequently, there exists the possibility that those directors may be in a position of conflict. Any decision made by those directors will be made in accordance with their duties and obligations to deal fairly and in good faith of our company and such other companies. In addition, such directors will declare, and refrain from voting on, any matter in which such directors may have a conflict of interest.

In accordance with mining industry practice, we attempt to acquire satisfactory title to our properties but have not obtained title insurance with the attendant risk that some titles, particularly titles to undeveloped properties, may be defective. In accordance with mining industry practice, we have not obtained title insurance on the mineral claims held by us. The Company carries out all normal procedures to obtain title and make a conscientious search of mining records to confirm that the Company has satisfactory title to the properties it has acquired by staking, purchase or option, and/or that satisfactory title is held by the optionor/owner of properties the Company may acquire pursuant to an option agreement, and/or that satisfactory title is held by the owner of properties in which the Company has earned a percentage interest in the property pursuant to a joint venture or other type of agreement. However, the possibility exists that title to one or more of the claims held by the Company, or an optionor/owner, or the owner of properties in which the Company has earned a percentage interest, might be defective for various reasons. The Company will take all reasonable steps to perfect title to any particular claims(s) found to be in question or deficient.

The Company owns or has the right to earn interests in properties under contract with a number of individuals and corporations. By the Company’s present assessment its’ most significant interests under earn-in options are the Golden Summit Property and the Almaden Property. The Almaden Property rests upon a chain of contractual leases and grants and options between various parties. The Golden Summit Property is held pursuant to the Fairbanks Assignment Agreement and several other key contracts. The Company is working under laws of the US and, although the Company has affected such researches and professional opinions as it considers financially reasonable in the circumstances, it has not engaged surveys or complete and unqualified professional opinions at this stage in the exploration of its properties.

Certain of the Company’s mining properties are unpatented mining claims located in the US, and the Company, upon acquiring an interest in and to such claims, will have only possessory title with respect to such properties. Because title to unpatented mining claims is subject to inherent uncertainties, including paramount title to the US, it is difficult to determine conclusively the ownership of such claims. In addition, and in order to retain title to an unpatented mining claim, a claim holder must have met annual assessment work requirements (US$100 per claim) through September 1, 1992 and must have complied with stringent state and federal regulations pertaining to the filing of assessment work affidavits. Moreover, after September 1, 1992, the right to locate or maintain a claim generally is conditional upon payment to the US of a rental fee of US$100 per claim per year for each governmental fiscal year instead of performing assessment work. State law may still require performance of assessment work. In 2004 the annual rental fee increased to US$125 per claim per year. Since most mining claims in the US are unpatented, this uncertainty is inherent in the mining industry.

For the last several Congressional sessions, bills have been repeatedly introduced in the US Congress which would supplant or radically alter the provisions of the Mining Law of 1872. In 2007 US House of Representatives passed the Hardrock Mining and Reclamation Act of 2007, which would update mining laws

that have been in place since 1872 and add new royalties on minerals on Federal public lands. The US Senate has also begun to hold its own hearings on the proposed legislative changes.

There is no assurance of the title to or boundaries of our resource properties.

Our mineral property interests may be subject to prior unregistered agreements of transfers or native land claims and title may be affected by undetected defects. We have not conducted surveys on the property and there is a risk that the boundaries could be challenged.

Our operations may be adversely affected by government and environmental regulations.

Each phase of the Company’s operations is subject to government and environmental regulations promulgated by government agencies from time to time. Environmental legislation provides for restrictions and prohibitions on spills, release or emissions of various substances produced in association with certain mining industry operations, such as seepage from tailings disposal areas, which would result in environmental pollution. A breach of such legislation may result in the imposition of fines and penalties. In addition, certain types of operations require the submission and approval of environmental impact assessments.

Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner which means that standards, enforcements, fines and penalties for non-compliance are more stringent. Environmental assessments of proposed projects carry a heightened degree of responsibility for us and our directors, officers and consultants. The cost of compliance with changes in governmental regulations has a potential to reduce the profitability of our operations. We do not maintain environmental liability insurance.

The Company’s activities are subject to extensive regulations governing various matters, including management and use of toxic substances and explosives, management of natural resources, exploration, development of mines, production and post-closure reclamation, exports, price controls, taxation, regulations concerning business dealings with indigenous peoples, labour standards on occupational health and safety, including mine safety, and historic and cultural preservation.

Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations may result in civil or criminal fines or penalties, enforcement actions thereunder, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions, any of which could result in the Company incurring significant expenditures. The Company may also be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of a breach of such laws, regulations or permitting requirements. It is also possible that future laws and regulations, or more stringent enforcement of current laws and regulations by governmental authorities, could cause additional expense, capital expenditures, restrictions on or suspension of the Company’s operations and delays in the exploration and development of its mineral properties.

Our operations may require licenses and permits from various governmental authorities. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain all of the necessary licenses and permits that may be required to conduct exploration, development and mining operations at our projects on certain properties in Alaska and Idaho.

Likely Passive Foreign Investor Company (“PFIC”) status has possible adverse tax consequences for U.S. investors

Current holders of and potential investors in our common shares who are U.S. taxpayers should be aware that the Company expects to be a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) for the current fiscal year, and may have been a PFIC in prior years and may also be a PFIC in subsequent years. If the Company is a PFIC for any year during a U.S. taxpayer’s holding period, then such U.S. taxpayers generally will be required to treat any so-called “excess distribution” received on its common shares, or any gain realized upon

a disposition of common shares, as ordinary income and to pay an interest charge on a portion of such distributions or gain, unless the taxpayer makes a qualified electing fund (“QEF”) election or a mark-to-market election with respect to the shares of the Company. In certain circumstances, the sum of the tax and the interest charge may exceed the amount of the excess distribution received, or the amount of proceeds of disposition realized, by the taxpayer. A U.S. taxpayer who makes a QEF election generally must report on a current basis its share of the Company’s net capital gain and ordinary earnings for any year in which the Company is a PFIC, whether or not the Company distributes any amounts to its shareholders. A U.S. taxpayer who makes the mark-to-market election generally must include as ordinary income each year the excess of the fair market value of the common shares over the taxpayer’s basis therein. U.S. taxpayers are advised to seek the counsel of their professional tax advisors. This paragraph is qualified in its entirety by the discussion below under the heading “Taxation—Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.” Each U.S. taxpayer should consult his or her own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, U.S. state and local, and foreign tax consequences of the PFIC rules and the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of our common shares.

The business of mineral exploration is highly competitive and there is no assurance we can compete with other competitors for financing, qualified personnel and other resources related to the operation of our business.

Significant competition exists for the limited number of property acquisition opportunities available. As a result of this competition, some of which is with large, established mining companies with substantial capabilities and greater financial and technical resources than us, we may be unable to acquire attractive mining properties on terms we consider acceptable. Competition in the precious metals mining industry is primarily for mineral rich properties which can be developed and exploited economically; the technical expertise to find, develop, and produce such properties; the labour to operate the properties; and the capital for the purpose of funding such properties. Many competitors not only explore for and mine precious metals and minerals but conduct refining and marketing operations on a worldwide basis. Such competition may result in our being unable to acquire desired properties, to recruit or retain qualified employees, to obtain necessary exploration, development or production equipment or to acquire the capital necessary to fund our operations and develop our properties. Our inability to compete with other mining companies for these resources may have a material adverse effect on our results of operation and business. There can be no assurance that our exploration and acquisition programs will yield any reserves or result in any commercial mining operation.

We are a foreign corporation and most of our directors and officers are outside of the United States, which may make enforcement of civil liabilities difficult.

We are incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Canada. Four of our directors and four officers are residents of Canada. Consequently, it may be difficult for United States investors to affect service of process within the United States upon those directors or officers who are not residents of the United States, or to realize in the United States upon judgments of United States courts predicated upon civil liabilities under the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A judgment of a US court predicated solely upon such civil liabilities would probably be enforceable in Canada by a Canadian court if the US court in which the judgment was obtained had jurisdiction, as determined by the Canadian court, in the matter. There is substantial doubt whether an original action could be brought successfully in Canada against any of such persons or us predicated solely upon such civil liabilities.

As a foreign private issuer, our shareholders may have less complete and timely data.

The Company is a “foreign private issuer” as defined in Rule 3b-4 under the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Equity securities of the Company are accordingly exempt from Sections 14(a), 14(b), 14(c), 14(f) and 16 of the Exchange Act pursuant to Rule 3a12-3 of the Exchange Act. Therefore, the Company is not required to file a Schedule 14A proxy statement in relation to the annual meeting of shareholders. The submission of proxy and annual meeting of shareholder information on Form 6-K may result in shareholders having less complete and timely information in connection with shareholder actions. The exemption from Section 16 rules regarding reports of beneficial ownership and

purchases and sales of common shares by insiders and restrictions on insider trading in our securities may result in shareholders having less data and there being fewer restrictions on insiders’ activities in our securities.

In 2007 and into 2008, the U.S. credit markets began to experience serious disruption due to a deterioration in residential property values, defaults and delinquencies in the residential mortgage market (particularly, sub-prime and non-prime mortgages) and a decline in the credit quality of mortgage backed securities. These problems led to a slow-down in residential housing market transactions, declining housing prices, delinquencies in non-mortgage consumer credit and a general decline in consumer confidence. These conditions continued and worsened in 2008, causing a loss of confidence in the broader U.S. and global credit and financial markets and resulting in the collapse of, and government intervention in, major banks, financial institutions and insurers and creating a climate of greater volatility, less liquidity, widening of credit spreads, a lack of price transparency, increased credit losses and tighter credit conditions. Notwithstanding various actions by the U.S. and foreign governments, concerns about the general condition of the capital markets, financial instruments, banks, investment banks, insurers and other financial institutions caused the broader credit markets to further deteriorate and stock markets to decline substantially. In addition, general economic indicators have deteriorated, including declining consumer sentiment, increased unemployment and declining economic growth and uncertainty about corporate earnings.

These unprecedented disruptions in the current credit and financial markets have had a significant material adverse impact on a number of financial institutions and have limited access to capital and credit for many companies. These disruptions could, among other things, make it more difficult for us to obtain, or increase our cost of obtaining, capital and financing for its operations. The Company’s access to additional capital may not be available on terms acceptable to it or at all.

The recent unprecedented events in global financial markets have had a profound impact on the global economy. Many industries, including the gold mining industry, are impacted by these market conditions. Some of the key impacts of the current financial market turmoil include contraction in credit markets resulting in a widening of credit risk, devaluations and high volatility in global equity, commodity, foreign exchange and precious metal markets, and a lack of market liquidity. A continued or worsened slowdown in the financial markets or other economic conditions, including but not limited to, consumer spending, employment rates, business conditions, inflation, fuel and energy costs, consumer debt levels, lack of available credit, the state of the financial markets, interest rates, and tax rates may adversely affect our growth and profitability. Specifically:

The global credit/liquidity crisis could impact the cost and availability of financing and our overall liquidity;

volatile energy prices, commodity and consumables prices and currency exchange rates impact potential production costs; and

the devaluation and volatility of global stock markets impacts the valuation of our equity securities

These factors could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We have never, and we do not have any intention of paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. In particular, there can be no assurance that our Board of Director’s will ever declare cash dividends, which action is completely within their discretion.

Economic conditions and fluctuation and volatility of stock price may negatively impact shareholder value

The market price of our common shares is highly volatile. If investors’ interest in the sector in which we operate declines, the price for our common shares would likely also decline. In addition, trading volumes in our common shares can be volatile and if the trading volume of our common shares experiences significant changes, the price of our common shares could be adversely affected. The price of our common shares could also be significantly affected by other factors, many of which are beyond our control.

Fluctuations in economic conditions, such as the continuing downturn in the global economy, may also significantly affect our ability to meet our objectives which could adversely affect our share price.

Broker-dealers may be discouraged from effecting transactions in our shares because they are considered a penny stock and are subject to the penny stock rules.

Our stock is a penny stock. The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which generally defines "penny stock" to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and "accredited investors". The term "accredited investor" refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the SEC, which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer's confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in and limit the marketability of our common stock.

At the end of the December 31, 2010 fiscal year, we will be required to provide an auditor’s attestation on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002-- any adverse results from such attestation could result in a loss of investor confidence in our financial reports and have an adverse effect on the price of our shares of common stock.

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we have furnished a report by management on our internal control over financial reporting in this Annual Report. Such report contains, among other

matters, an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, including a statement as to whether or not our internal control over financial reporting is effective.

For our Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, such report must also contain a statement that our auditors have issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of such internal controls.

We have evaluated our internal control over financial reporting and have concluded that our internal control over financial reporting is effective. Our auditors have not conducted the evaluation necessary to provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. During the auditor’s evaluation and testing process, they may identify one or more material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, and they will be unable to attest that such internal control is effective. If our auditor’s are unable to attest that our internal control over financial reporting is effective as of December 31, 2010, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which would have a material adverse effect on our stock price.

Failure to comply with the new rules may make it more difficult for us to obtain certain types of insurance, including director and officer liability insurance, and we may be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage and/or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. The impact of these events could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, on committees of our board of directors, or as executive officers.

If we raise additional funding through equity financings, then our current shareholders will suffer dilution.

One of our sources of possible future funding includes sale of equity capital or debt financing. Any sale of equity capital will result in dilution to existing shareholders. The only other alternative for the financing of further exploration would be the offering by us of an interest in our properties to be earned by another party or parties carrying out further exploration thereof.

Dilution through contractor, director and consultant options could adversely affect our stockholders.

Because our success is highly dependent on our contractors, we grant some or all of our key contractors, officers, directors and consultants options to purchase common shares, as non-cash incentives. If significant numbers of these options are granted and exercised, the interests of other stockholders may be diluted.

As of December 31, 2008, the Company had reserved 8,700,308 common shares for issuance upon the exercise of warrants and incentive stock options, and for the issuance for performance shares. Such common shares represent a potential equity dilution of approximately 14% based upon the number of outstanding and allotted shares at December 31, 2008 of 64,226,593. Furthermore, the Company may enter into commitments in the future, which would require the issuance of additional common shares and may grant additional stock options and/or issue additional warrants. At December 31, 2008 the Company had unlimited and authorized but unissued and unreserved common shares. Issuance of additional shares would be subject to Exchange regulatory approval and compliance with applicable securities legislation. The Company currently has no plans to issue common shares other than for the purposes of raising funds for property acquisition, exploration and for general working capital.

The trading market for our shares is not always liquid. The market price of the Company’s common shares has ranged from a high of $2.17 and a low of $0.11 during the twelve month period ended December 31, 2008. Although our shares trade on the TSX Exchange (“TSX”) and the FINRA Over the Counter Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”) and are quoted in Germany on the Frankfurt, Berlin, Stuttgart and Munich stock exchanges under the trade symbol FR4. The volume of shares traded at any one time can be limited, and, as a result, there may not be a liquid trading market for our shares.

In Canada the Company is in the exploration stage. To date all permits required to conduct exploration programs have been applied for. Should additional exploration take place, the Company will continue to comply with all permits required for field exploration.

The Company was incorporated on July 22, 1985, under the name FreeGold Recovery Inc., under the laws of the Province of Alberta. On August 21, 1991, the Company continued out of the Province of Alberta into the Province of British Columbia. On November 25, 1993, the Company changed its name to International Freegold Mineral Development Inc. and consolidated its share capital on a six old shares for one new common share basis. On September 4, 2002 the Company changed its name to Freegold Ventures Limited and consolidated its share capital on a four old shares for one new common share basis. In this document the “Company” means Freegold Ventures Limited and, except where the context so requires, its subsidiary.

The Company carries out its operations in Alaska and Idaho through its wholly owned subsidiaries, Free Gold Recovery, USA (“Freegold US”) and Freegold Ventures Limited, USA (“Freegold USA”). Freegold US was incorporated on November 12, 1985, under the laws of the State of Nevada. Freegold USA was incorporated on June 19, 2003, under the laws of the State of Alaska. The Company is also the sole shareholder of Ican Minerals, Inc. (“Ican”) and Canu Resources, Inc. (“Canu”). Ican and Canu are both US corporations that were previously involved in mineral property exploration, but are currently inactive.

The Company’s agent in the host country is Incorp Services, Inc., 3155 East Patrick Lane, Suite 1, Vegas, NV 89120-3481.

The Company's office is located at 507 – 1540 West 2^nd Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia V6J 1H2. The Company is a reporting issuer in the Provinces of British Columbia, Alberta, and Ontario, Canada. Its common shares were traded on the TSX Venture Exchange starting March 11, 1987 under the trade symbol “ITF”. Since May 19, 1998, the Company’s common shares have traded on the TSX Exchange under trade symbol “ITF”. The Company has also been listed on the OTCBB since July 24, 2002, first under the trade symbol “ITFMF”, and since September 4, 2002 under the trade symbol “FGOVF”. The Company’s common shares are also quoted in Germany on the Frankfurt, Berlin, Stuttgart and Munich stock exchanges under the trade symbol FR4.

The Company, together with or through its US subsidiaries carries on the business of acquiring and exploring precious metal properties in the US and Canada. The Company's material mineral properties are the Golden Summit Property, Alaska, and the Almaden Property, Idaho. Non-material exploration properties include the Rob, Vinasale and Union Bay properties in Alaska and the PGM A Property in Ontario.

The Company's primary objective is to explore its existing mineral properties. Its secondary objective is to locate, evaluate and acquire other mineral properties, and to finance their exploration, either through equity financing, by way of joint venture or option agreements or through a combination of both. There are currently no known economic resources on any of the existing properties.

The Company is the sole shareholder of Freegold US, Freegold USA, Ican and Canu, all US corporations.

Figure and Table numbers have been renumbered from the text excerpts from original reports included in this document to facilitate reading

The Golden Summit project consists of 14 patented Federal lode claims, 76 unpatented Federal lode claims and 80 State of Alaska mining claims covering approximately 5,000 acres in the Fairbanks Mining District of Alaska known as the Golden Summit Property. In January 2008, the Company purchased approximately 300 acres of land in the Golden Summit Project Area.

By various agreements dated from 1 December 1992 to 9 May 1997, the Company acquired from Fairbanks Exploration Inc. (“FEI”) certain mineral claims in the Fairbanks Mining District of Alaska known as the Golden Summit Property, subject to a 7% working interest held in trust for FEI by the Company. The property is controlled by the Company through long-term lease agreements or outright claim ownership. As consideration for the property, the Company agreed to:

- Issue 25,000 shares of the Company for each US$1,000,000 in expenditures spent on the property including all underlying lease obligations since 9 May 1997 to an aggregate of 125,000 shares. As at 31 December 2008, the Company had issued 125,000 shares.

- Expend a minimum of US$1,767,000 of exploration expenditures on the property before 2000 (completed); and

- Make all required lease payments to underlying lessors (see Note 4a(i-iii) of the financial statements).

The Company will fund 100% of the project until commercial production is achieved at which point FEI will be required to contribute 7% of any approved budget. The property is subject to a 2% Net Smelter Royalty (“NSR”). The Company has a 30 day right of first refusal in the event that the 7% working interest of FEI or the NSR is to be sold. The Company can also purchase the NSR at any time following commercial production, based on its net present value as determined by mineable reserves.

By agreement dated 17 May 1992 and amended 15 May 2000 and 30 November 2001, the Company agreed to make advance royalty payments as follows:


		US Funds
1992 – 1998 (US$15,000 per year)	$	105,000	(paid)
2000	$	50,000	($25,000 paid in cash and $25,000 with 58,898 treasury shares issued)
2001- 2006 (US$50,000 per year)	$	300,000	(paid)
2007 (US$150,000 per year)	$	150,000	(paid)
2008 (US$150,000 per year)	$	150,000	(paid $75,000 in 2008 with the remaining $75,000 paid in 2009, subject to a payment extension.
2009 – 2019 (US$150,000 per year)	$	1,650,000

* The 2001 US$50,000 advance royalty payment was settled by issuing 250,000 shares. These shares were issued during the year ended 31 December 2002. An amendment signing bonus of US$50,000 was paid 1 October 2000. The leased property is subject to a 3% NSR.

During exploration and before commencement of production the Company was required to perform a minimum amount of work on the Property in an amount of not less than US$50,000 in each of the calendar years 2000 through 2008 (completed). The Company shall have until March 31^st of each year to determine whether it will continue with the lease.

By lease agreement dated 28 February 1986 and amended 26 March 1996, the Company assumed the obligation to make advance royalty payments of US$2,500 per year until 1996 (paid) and US$5,000 per year until 2006 (paid to date). During 2006, the Company renewed the existing lease term for an additional 5 years on the same terms and conditions. The claims are subject to a 4% NSR which the Company has an option to purchase for the greater of the current value or US$1,000,000. These payments are current.

In May 2004, the Company entered into an agreement with a third party (the “Seller”) whereby the Seller transferred 100% of the rights via Quit Claim Deed to a 20-year lease on the Tolovana Gold Property in Alaska.

Under the terms of the agreement, the Company assumed all of the Seller’s obligations under the lease, which include making annual payments of $1,000 per month for the first 23 months, increasing to $1,250 per month for the 24th to the 48th months, and increasing to $1,500 after the 49th month and for the duration of the lease. These payments are current.

The property is subject to a sliding scale NSR as follows: 1.5% NSR if gold is below US$300, in the event the price of gold is between US$300 to US$400, 2.0% NSR, and in the event that the price of gold is above US$400, the property is subject to a 3.0% NSR. In addition, the Company has made a cash payment of US$7,500 on signing and issued 400,000 shares on regulatory approval. An additional 200,000 shares are to be issued within 30 days of a minimum 200,000 ounce mineral resource being calculated on the property if the resource is established in five years or less from the date of the agreement.

The following italicized text was excerpted from a 43-101 Report prepared by Avalon Development Corporation entitled “Executive Summary Report for the Golden Summit Project, Fairbanks Mining District, Alaska, dated March 29^th, 2008” and filed in conjunction with this Form 20F on SEDAR. All references noted within the text can be found in the references section of this referenced report.

The Golden Summit project is located approximately 20 road miles north of Fairbanks, Alaska (Figure1-1). The Golden Summit project consists of 14 patented Federal lode claims, 76 unpatented Federal lode claims and 80 State of Alaska mining claims covering approximately 5,000 acres. The claims are registered under various owners and claim names. In addition to the exploration lands listed above, in late January 2008 Freegold purchased 100% interest in 301.5 acres of patented mining claims plus three additional 40-acre State mining claims. These claims are located on Cleary Creek on the north side of the Golden Summit project.

Mineral rights in this part of Alaska are administered by the State of Alaska (State claims) and the US Bureau of Land Management (federal claims). Annual rents vary according to type of claim, claim size and age and are due and payable by August 31 of each year for unpatented federal mining claims and by November 30 of each year for State mining claims. Total 2007-2008 rents due for federal claims total

US$9,500 while rentals due on State claims total US$7,640. Claim rentals are paid in lieu of annual labor for unpatented federal claims while annual work commitment on State mining claims total US$2.50 per acre per year. Amounts spent in excess of these levels are bankable on State mining claims for up to four years into the future. All claims on the Golden Summit project currently are in good standing. The land on which the project is situated is zoned as Mineral Land by the Fairbanks North Star Borough, and gives mineral development activities first priority use. There currently are no unusual social, political or environmental encumbrances to mining on the project. Other than the 14 patented mining claims (fee simple lands) the claims of the Golden Summit project have not been surveyed by a registered land or mineral surveyor and there is no State or federal law or regulation requiring such surveying. Survey plats for all patented mining claims are open to public inspection at the Bureau of Land Management.

The Company is unaware of any environmental liabilities associated with the Property.

The paved Steese Highway transects the Golden Summit property and is connected to State and privately maintained gravel roads allowing easy access to most areas of the property on a year-round basis.

Elevations on the property range from 1,000 feet to over 2,200 feet. Topography in the area is dominated by low rounded hills dissected by relatively steep walled valleys. Outcrops are scarce except in man-made exposures. Vegetation consists of a tundra mat that supports sub-arctic vegetation (alder, willow, black spruce, aspen and birch). A variably thick layer of aeolian silt covers most of the property. Permafrost is limited to small discontinuous lenses on steep, poorly drained north-facing slopes and has posed no hindrance to past development. The climate in this portion of Alaska is dominated by 6 to 8 months of sub-freezing temperatures in winter followed by 4 to 6 months of warm summer weather. Average annual precipitation is 13 inches, mostly as snowfall.

A high voltage electrical power line, land telephone lines, and a cellular phone net service the property. The greater Fairbanks area supports a population of approximately 75,000 and has excellent labor and services infrastructure, including rail and international airport access. Exploration and development costs in the Fairbanks area are at or below those common in the western United States.

Freegold currently holds a valid Five Year Hardrock Exploration Permit and a valid Five Year Small Mine Permit on the project. Additional permits for currently anticipated future work are being acquired from the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, Army Corps of Engineers and other State, federal and local regulatory agencies as required.

Placer or lode gold mining has occurred almost continuously in the Golden Summit project area since gold was discovered in the district in 1902. Over 9.5 million ounces of placer gold have been recovered from the Fairbanks Mining District, of which 6.75 million ounces have been recovered from streams that drain the Golden Summit project (Freeman, 1992e). In addition, over 506,000 ounces of lode gold were recovered from past producing mines on the Golden Summit project (Freeman and others, 1996). More than 80 lode gold occurrences have been documented in the project area. Recent exploration discoveries in the Tintina Gold Belt have underscored the potential for bulk tonnage and high-grade deposits, both of which are known to exist in the Golden Summit project area (McCoy and others, 1997; Flanigan and others, 2000).

Freegold acquired an interest in the Golden Summit project in mid-1991 and since then has conducted extensive mapping, soil sampling, trenching, rock sampling, geophysical surveys and core, reverse circulation, and rotary air blast drilling on the project (Freeman, 1991; Galey and others, 1993; Freeman and others, 1996; Freeman and others, 1998; Freeman, 2004; Freeman, 2005; Freeman, 2006 and Freeman, 2007). Freegold acquired an interest in the Golden Summit project in mid-1991 and since then has conducted extensive mapping, soil sampling, trenching, rock sampling, geophysical surveys and core, reverse circulation, and rotary air blast drilling on the project (Freeman, 1991; Galey and others, 1993; Freeman and others, 1996; Freeman and others, 1998; Freeman, 2004; Freeman, 2005; Freeman, 2006 and Freeman, 2007, 2008). Drilling completed by Freegold on the Golden Summit project since 1991 includes 88,241 feet of core and reverse circulation in 214 holes and 80,822 feet of rotary air blast drilling in 2,028 holes.

In 2004 exploration work at Golden Summit consisted of diamond core drilling at Cleary Hill mine prospect (6 holes, 4,960.5 feet) and trenching (1,790 feet) and diamond core drilling at the Tolovana prospect (7 holes,

3,585 feet). Total expenditures in 2004 were $301,852 on the Cleary Hill prospect and $355,424 on the Tolovana prospect. In additional a total of 683 line-kilometers of fixed-wing airborne magnetics was flown over the Golden Summit project. In 2005, dozer and backhoe trenching were conducted at the Cleary Hill prospect (6 trenches, 1,270 feet). Total expenditures in 2004 were $850,000. In 2006 four programs totaling 321 man-days of work were completed at a cost of $816,000, all of which was spent in the Cleary Hill mine area. This work included dozer trenching and collection of 9,900 tons of bulk sample from the Beistline, Cleary Roadcut, Cleary High Grade, D8, Red, Alaska, Wackwitz and Currey zones.

During 2007 a total of 28,602 feet of shallow (<78 feet deep) Rotary Air Blast (RAB) drilling was completed in the Cleary Hill mine area (504 holes). Total approximate expenditures at Cleary Hill Mine prospect in 2007 was $3,651,868. In addition, stripping and stockpiling was completed in the Beistline pit area and along RAB fence 1. At the Beistline pit area, a total of 3,150 tons of low grade material was stockpiled and 1,162 tons of high grade material stockpiled for possible future bulk sample processing. In the Fence 1 area, a total of 6,330 tons of low grade material was stockpiled and 780 tons of high grade material stockpiled for possible future bulk sample processing. A total of 270 tons of the mineralized material stockpiled from Fence 1 was transported to the pilot-scale gravity processing plant constructed by Freegold on Cleary Creek near the mouth of Wolf Creek. Of this total, 120 tons of material came from the Cleary Hill vein immediately east of the Red Shaft while 150 tons of material came from the Cleary Hill vein in Fence 1 Cut 5. The results from bulk sample processing conducted by Freegold in 2007 are not yet available to the authors. In addition, during 2007 a total of 11,449 feet of shallow (<78 feet deep) Rotary Air Blast (RAB) drilling was completed in the Tolovana mine area (170 holes). Total approximate expenditures at Tolovana prospect in 2007 was $400,000.

During 2008 a total of 10,063.5feet of diamond core drilling was completed in 26 holes. A total of 21,139 feet of exploration RAB drilling was completed in 291 holes averaging 63 feet deep. A total of 19,635 feet of definition RAB drilling was completed in 1,063 holes averaging 18.5 feet deep and sampled on 2.5 foot intervals. Total approximate expenditures at Golden Summit in 2008 was $3,199,940. In addition, stripping and stockpiling was completed in the Beistline pit area, Fence 1 pit and the Cleary North pit. A total of 28,274 tons of high grade material from these pits was transported to and processed at the company’s gravity test plant on Cleary Creek. The final results from bulk sample processing conducted by Freegold in 2008 are not yet available to the authors.

Total expenditures from 1991 through 2006 amount to $8.2 million with an additional $7,391,698 spent in 2007 and 2008. Work completed during the period 1991 through 2008 is in excess of those amounts required by law and contract.

Bedrock geology of the Fairbanks Mining District is dominated by a N60-80E trending lithologic and structural trend covering a 30-mile by 15-mile area. The Golden Summit project is situated in lower to middle Paleozoic metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks of the Cleary sequence and Fairbanks Schist adjacent to a northwest trending thrust fault known as the Chatanika thrust.

Rocks on the Golden Summit project are folded about earlier northwest and northeast trending isoclinal recumbent fold axes followed by an open folded N60-80E trending event (Hall, 1985). Upper plate rocks of the Chatanika terrane have been affected by more intense northwest and northeast trending isoclinal and recumbent folding followed by folding along the same N60-80E trending axis which affected lower plate rocks. Lithologic packages in both the upper and lower plates are cut by steeply dipping, high angle northwest and northeast trending shear zones, some of which are mineralized (Figure 3). Recent large-scale trenching in the Cleary Hill mine area suggest that numerous low angle structures are present in the Golden Summit project area, some of which are mineralized. Late post-mineral north-south structures with normal motion further dissect the project. Airborne magnetic data in this part of the Fairbanks District indicate the presence of district scale east-west and northeast trending structures which appear to post-date N60-80E

folding (DGGS, 1995). Gold mineralization on the Golden Summit project post-dates regional and district scale folding and is contemporaneous with or slightly younger than district-scale northeast trending structures and plutonic activity. Excavations completed in the Cleary Hill area in 2006, 2007 and 2008 clearly indicate that the strike and/or dip of gold-bearing quartz veins were influenced by pre-existing fold geometry

Despite its distinction as being the most productive historic lode mine in the Fairbanks District, virtually no exploration of the Cleary Hill mine area occurred between the time it was last operated in 1942 and the fall of 1996 when Freegold conducted its first drilling directed specifically at Cleary Hill’s high grade shear-hosted quartz vein mineralization. The following is a brief historic summary of the Cleary Hill mine following by a chronological summary of exploration conducted at Cleary Hill since 1996.

In 1946 several attempts were made to reopen the mine but were unsuccessful due to the lack of working capital, manpower and equipment. Production from the Cleary Hill was largely derived from the Cleary Hill Vein. This vein strikes N70W-80W and has a south dip of 45 to 70 degrees, with the dip of vein varying according to bedrock host. Steeper dips are found in more competent rocks and shallower dips are found in less competent rock units. Recent work by Freegold has determined that the Cleary Hill mine extracted their production from a series of subparallel veins which were collectively called the “Cleary Hill vein”.

Production from the mine took place over six levels (approx. 400 vertical feet) and consisted of quartz vein-hosted coarse free gold with trace arsenopyrite, pyrite, boulangerite and tetrahedrite. Average thickness of the Cleary Hill high-grade vein was less than 3 feet.

The following is an exploration summary for 2008 and unless otherwise noted, all of the exploration work contained in this section was conducted on the Cleary Hill mine prospect on the western Golden Summit project. A detailed summary of work conducted prior to 2007 is presented in Freeman (2008) and will not be summarized.

A diamond core drilling program was completed at the Cleary Hill prospect during a 51-day period in February, March and April, 2008. Drilling consisted of 23 holes totaling 8,839.5 feet. Of this total, 13 holes, totaling 6,757 feet were completed in the Fence 1 area and 10 holes, totaling 2,082.5 feet were completed in the Beistline pit area (Table 1). Core holes were drilled in two areas, testing mineralization on the multiple shear and vein swarms at the Fence 1 and Beistline bulk sample sites. Because of coarse gold loss concerns, whole core analysis was conducted during the 2008 core drilling program. Procedures followed for this work are presented in “Sample Method and Approach”.

The 2008 Cleary Hill prospect core drilling program had two primary and one secondary goal as follows:

Extension of RAB mineralization: One of the primary goals of the 2008 core program was to extend mineralization from shallow RAB drill holes to depth below the maximum 78-foot depth reached by 2007 RAB holes on Fence 1 and to extend mineralization east along strike from the predominantly southwest-dipping vein swarm identified by trenching and RAB drilling. Core drilling was successful in extending mineralization to depth and along strike and helped quantify important structural information previously inferred from RAB drilling.

Optimum Hole Spacing: The other primary goal of the 2008 Cleary Hill core program was to determine optimum core hole spacing and orientation that would allow reliable resource estimates to be calculated using combined RAB and core hole data. Evaluation of the drilling results suggests resource estimation will require closer spaced core drilling than was conducted in 2008.

Continuity to Depth: A secondary goal of the 2008 Cleary Hill prospect core drilling program was to test the depth extent and grade of structures extending from the Wackwitz vein on the south to the Cleary Hill vein on the north. As expected from previous core drilling in the Cleary Hill area between 1997 an 2004, structural continuity at depth appears promising but grade continuity is unpredictable at the hole spacings utilized in 2008.

Core drilling in 2008 began at Fence 1 with 5 holes drilled on 100 foot spacings along the north-south axis of the 2007 Fence 1 RAB drill pattern (Plate 1). Four of these holes were directed due north while one hole (GSDC0801) was directed due south (Table 1). Two additional north-south core drill lines, each containing 4 core holes, were offset to the east at 100 feet and 200 feet from the main Fence 1 drill line. All holes on the 100E and 200E drill lines were angled due north. The resulting drill pattern was a 100 foot by 100 foot grid covering an area 200 feet east-west by 400 feet north-south. The three north-south drill lines are referred to collectively as Cleary Fence 1.

Most north-directed core holes on Fence 1, including GSDC0805 and GSDC0816-GSDC0823, were targeted for termination beyond the down-dip projection of the Cleary Hill vein swarm. The Cleary Hill vein swarm was exposed in 2007 trenching between 225 feet and 350 feet north of the Fence 1 vein swarm. The Cleary vein swarm dips on average at 45- 65 degrees southwest and strikes on average between 090 and 124 degrees. Holes GSDC0801-GSDC0804 were relatively short holes designed to intersect only the Fence 1 vein swarm immediately below the RAB drilling.

Originally, 2008 core drilling at Fence 1 was planned to only test the down-dip and east strike projections of the Fence 1 vein swarm. The 2008 core drill pattern was determined accordingly, within and to the south of the Fence 1 vein swarm. When drilling through the Cleary Hill vein swarm was added to the goals of the drill program, it became necessary to drill through the 225 foot wide unmineralized zone that lies between

the Fence 1 and Cleary Hill vein swarms. As a result, none of the Cleary Hill vein intercepts are near enough to the surface to constitute bulk sampling targets.

The main target within the Fence 1 vein swarm is a 300 foot wide zone of gold mineralization identified by trenching and RAB drilling in 2006 and 2007. This zone is characterized by several shear zones ranging in width from 2 to 12 feet, dipping southwest or southeast at 45 to 65 degrees, and striking between 076 and 110 degrees, Mineralization within the shear zones is primarily restricted to quartz veins within the shears. These veins are generally fault bounded giving them limited strike continuity. Veins can occur at the shear zone footwall boundaries, at the hanging wall boundaries, or meandering within the shear zone itself. Some auriferous quartz veins follow conjugate joint sets between shear zones. Mineralized quartz veins are typically sub-parallel to nearby shear zones and dip at similar angles. When hosted in brittle rock units, the veins typically have sharp contacts with the wall rocks. In some competent host rocks, the veins form stockworks of anastomosing veinlets controlled primarily by pre-existing joint sets.

Following evaluation of the 2007 RAB drilling results, it appeared that the Fence 1 vein swarm was comprised of three discrete zones, referred to on the project as the north, middle, and southern sections. The three sections were separated by varying widths of unmineralized rock. Following the 2008 core drilling program and subsequent close-spaced RAB definition drilling, it became clear that the three Fence 1 zones are part of two intersecting vein swarms, referred to here as the Fence 1 and Wackwitz vein swarms. Core and RAB drilling indicate these two swarms converge and/or diverge at depth and appear to converge along strike to the east in an area where little or no surface exploration has been done. The significance of this apparent convergence, if any, remains untested and unclear.

In summary, the following conclusions can be drawn from the 2008 core drilling program at Fence 1:

Drill results confirmed continuity of grade of the Fence 1 vein swarm at depth below the 2007 RAB drill pattern.

Fence 1 core drilling also extended continuity of mineralization on strike 200 feet east of Fence 1 (through Fence 1, Line 200E).

Hole spacing utilized in 2008 (100 foot square grid) was insufficient to allow reliable grade-tonnage calculation to be conducted.

Intercepts of the Cleary Hill vein suggest is contains high grade mineralization similar to that seen at surface and similar to that mined in the historic underground mine.

Low grade gold mineralization can occur both in the hanging wall and in the footwall of the Cleary Hill vein system. The reasons are unclear why the low grade mineralization forms where it does and what causes it to be concentrated above and/or below the higher grade veins.

Upon completion of hole GSDC0805 at Fence 1, drilling operations were moved to the Beistline pit. Holes GSDC0806 through GSDC0815. These ten holes were drilled from 5 pads spaced 100 feet apart along the strike of the Beistline structure striking at approximately 124 degrees. Table 2 presents a summary of significant geochemical results from the Beistline pit drilling. Drill hole collar locations are presented in Plate 1. Complete geochemical results can be found in Appendix 2. Cross sections through the 2008 Beistline core drilling are presented in Appendix 3.

The objective of core drilling at Beistline was to test mineralization on the down dip extension of the southwest dipping Beistline vein swarm which was previously identified by bulk sampling and trenching in 2006 and RAB drilling in 2007. The Beistline vein swarm, which includes other known mineralized structures in both the footwall and hanging wall of the main Beistline shear, dips between 45 and 65 degrees southwest and strikes between 110 and 124 degrees. Holes at Beistline were drilled as close to perpendicular to the strike of the Beistline structure as possible and when drilled other than vertical were oriented at azimuth 027 degrees. Two holes were collared at each drill pad set-up with one vertical and one angle hole at each pad. This allowed testing of mineralized structures slightly below the elevation of the bottom of the 2006 Beistline bulk sample pit and the vertical holes tested mineralization down dip on these structures below the reach of conventional RAB drilling.

In summary, the following conclusions can be drawn from the 2008 core drilling program at the Beistline pit area:

The 2008 core drilling program at the Beistline pit area defined continuity on six mineralized structures (Beistline shear, BSTFW1, BSTFW2, BSTFW3, BSTHWV, the B1 shear) for a linear distance of 400 feet at the Beistline pit.

The Beistline shear appears to be a master controlling structure and an extension of the East Fault identified further west in the underground workings of the Cleary Hill Mine.

Core drilling at Beistline confirmed the previously unknown existence of multiple sub-parallel mineralized shears and veins (BSTFW1-BSTFW3) in the footwall of the Beistline shear which are either separate structures or splays of the main Beistline shear.

The B1 and BSTHWV are mineralized structures in the hangingwall of the Beistline shear and appear to converge with the main Beistline structure. This is further evidence to support the view that Beistline is a master structure and shears and veins in its hangingwall are splays off of the Beistline shear.

Results from core drilling at Beistline confirm the high degree of grade variability on all structures along strike and downdip, similar to other mineralized veins and shears at Cleary Hill.

Knowledge attained from core drilling at Beistline in 2008 will help to predict behavior of the Beistline and surrounding mineralization in its hangingwall and footwall moving southeast toward the Fort Apache and Anna Mary prospects.

Core drilling at Beistline also indicates mineralization is likely to continue northwest in the footwall of the Beistline/East fault structure into an area of the Cleary Hill mine prospect that as not been previous mined or explored from surface.

In the spring of 2008, Freegold initiated an exploration RAB drilling program at Cleary Hill, drilling a total of 5,421 feet on two separate occasions from 2/13/08 to 3/07/08, and from 6/02/08 to 6/05/08. A total of 73 RAB holes were completed on two separate drill fences to test the multiple shear and vein swarms known to exist west of Fence 1 (Fence 24), and west of the Beistline pit (Fence 21). Both RAB fences intercepted multiple significant grade-thickness intervals which correlate with veins and shear zones encountered in previous RAB drilling and bulk sample pit excavations.

Background: The purpose of the 2008 definition RAB drilling program was to collect sufficient data in proposed bulk sample pits to allow accurate grade-tonnage models to be constructed. These data would be the primary tool used in grade control during bulk sampling. A 2D model would allow geologists in the pit to control bulk sampling with cross sectional assay data and track structures laterally across pits with grade plan maps. Geochemical assay data cross sections and plan view grade maps were generated primarily from 2008 definition RAB drilling assay results, but also included previously collected data from past core and RAB drill programs.

The definition RAB drill program at Golden Summit commenced in June 2008. This program was commenced several weeks ahead of planned bulk sampling at the Beistline and Fence 1 pits and was a departure from exploratory RAB drilling in several ways. The sample technique, including the sample interval width, was changed for definition RAB drilling. Definition RAB drill holes were placed on a 10 foot x 10 foot grid pattern at the Beistline and Fence 1 pits to insure adequate coverage of mineralized structures along both strike and at depth. Drill depths varied but were designed to push drilling to a common elevation at each of the bulk sample sites.

The only exception to the above-outlined drill pattern was the limited scale definition RAB drilling conducted in the Cleary North area. RAB drilling at Cleary North was limited to double lines of offset holes focusing on following the strike projections of several known mineralized veins and shears in the vicinity of the Cleary Hill vein.

Prior to the commencement of 2008 bulk sampling operations at Golden Summit, all bulk sample stockpiles that were collected during 2007 but not hauled to the test plant for processing were hauled to the Freegold processing plant. Stockpiles from 2007 were located at the Beistline and Fence 1 pits, and were hauled between 8/21/08 and 9/03/08. Table 2 shows tonnage for all 2007 stockpiles hauled during 2008. Details relating to these stockpiles are presented in Freeman (2008).

Background: The2008 bulk sample excavation program consisted of 30,316 tons of material excavated from three separate bulk sample pits in the Cleary Hill area (Table 3). The material was trucked to the confluence of Cleary Creek and Wolf Creek where it was stockpiled in preparation for crushing and processing in Freegold’s gravity plant constructed during the summer of 2007 and upgraded in mid-2008. The material from each of the three bulk sample sites was stockpiled separately so that the grade and metallurgical characteristics of each of the bulk sample area could be determined. Low grade material was stockpiled on site at each pit. Waste material was deposited at the waste piles created for bulk sample operations in 2007 with the exception of a new waste dump created in 2008 for the Cleary Hill vein pit.

The 2008 plant operations processed 39,559 tons of bulk sampled material in three categories. Re-processing of coarse tails from the 2007 bulk sample processing comprised 2,583 tons. This material came from several bulk sample locations including Cleary Hill mine dumps, the Wackwitz vein and the Cleary Hill road cut vein. Average head grade for this material was 0.075 oz/t (2.58 g/t). An additional 5,072 tons of Beistline Bleed and Beistline main bulk sample material from 2006 bulk sample excavation was also completed for which assay data is available. These average head assay for this bulk sample material was 0.031 oz/t (1.07 g/t). The average head assay grade of the first 7,655 tons of material processed was 0.055 oz/t (1.89 g/t). Due to a shortage of funds, completion of head sample assaying for the remaining 31,904 tons processed was placed on hold pending the availability of additional financing. Of the remaining 31,904 tons processed, 9,114 tons consisted of the remaining Beistline main 2006 bulk sample material plus the Beistline and Fence material bulk sampled and stockpiled in 2007. The remaining 22,790 tons was bulk sample material excavated, hauled to the plant site and processed during 2008 plant operations.

The results of the head sample assays from the first 7,755 tons processed indicates that the bulk sample material excavated and processed had a gold grade sufficiently high to be considered as bulk mineable material. Completion of the assaying for the balance of the 2008 tonnage processed, and reconciliation of that grade with the 10 foot X 10 foot grid drilling for the 2008 bulk sample excavation, will help determine whether additional work is justified to further delineate bulk mineable material in the Cleary Hill area. Following analysis of these results, Freegold expects to be able to determine the optimal drill spacing that could allow for resource definition.

The Tolovana prospect is located on the divide between Bedrock and Willow Creeks, both north draining tributaries of upper Cleary Creek. Previous mining was conducted at the Tolovana mine, a small underground producer from which 5,000 of gold were extracted prior to World War II from high angle quartz veins hosted in intensely sericite altered lower plate rocks of the Fairbanks Schist. Although drilling had been conducted in 1994-1996 and 1998 on the Dolphin intrusive prospect located immediately south of the Tolovana mine, no significant exploration of the Tolovana vein system had been conducted until trenching and drilling were completed in 2004.

The following is an exploration summary for 2008 and unless otherwise noted, all of the exploration work contained in this section was conducted on the Tolovana prospect on the western Golden Summit project. A detailed summary of work conducted prior to 2007 is presented in Freeman (2008) and will not be summarized.

A diamond core drilling program was completed at the Tolovana prospect during a 9-day period in April, 2008. Drilling consisted of 3 holes totaling 1,224 feet. All core holes were drilled from a single pad, testing mineralization on the multiple shear zones and veins of the Tolovana-Scheuyemere vein swarm. Because of coarse gold loss concerns, whole core analysis was conducted during the 2008 core drilling program (see “Sample Method and Approach”). Drilling was completed by Colorado-based CNC Drilling using a skid-mounted Atlas Copco CS1000 core drill.

Preparation work required prior to drilling at Tolovana involved snow removal on the Tolovana Road, ice removal at the Tolovana Road/Cleary Creek crossing, and establishment of the drill pad at the south end of Fence 15. Access was also established on the newly built Tolovana/Bedrock Creek road, which was plowed and used exclusively for drill support access as breakup approached.  

The objective of core drilling at Tolovana was to test mineralization on the down dip extension of the Scheuyemere and Tolovana vein swarms. These two structures were explored by RAB drilling in 2007 and at the time of commencement of core drilling in 2008 were slated for further exploration by RAB drilling in the summer of 2008. Limited historical records from underground workings of the Tolovana adit and Scheuyemere shaft along with previous surface trenching, core drilling and RAB drilling indicate that mineralization on these structures has variable dips ranging between 40-60 degrees southeast with strikes between 060 and 080 degrees. All core holes drilled in 2008 were oriented at 320 degrees, enabling core

intercepts to be as close to perpendicular as possible to the dominant strike of known mineralized structures in the area. The NW oriented core holes were well positioned to intercept the Tolovana vein swarm east of its discovery location and possibly any other mineralized structures existing to the north which have not been previously defined by any drilling to date.

The 2008 drill results at Tolovana confirmed continuity of grade on the Tolovana vein swarm on strike between RAB fences 6 and 15, drilled in 2007. All holes intercepted several significant grade-thickness intervals which correlate with veins and shear zones encountered in previous RAB drilling programs. Significant drill intercepts from the 2008 core drilling program are presented in Table 2. Core drilling in 2008 also for the first time tested mineralization into the footwall of the Tolovana-Scheuyemere vein swarms.

The Scheuyemere vein zone is characterized by several shear zones ranging in width from 1 to 20 feet, striking between 050-070 degrees and dipping 45 to 60 degrees southeast. When excavating in 2008 to the north of previous trenching and RAB drilling, several previously unknown shear zones and quartz veins were discovered in the footwall of the Scheuyemere vein swarm. Results from several surface grab samples collected in the fall of 2007 indicated these structures host high grade gold mineralization (see Fence grab samples in 2008 Exploration RAB Drilling). These shears and veins appeared to occur in swarms separated by intervals of unmineralized rock. At the time of core drilling in 2008 the mineralized zones were referred to as the Tolovana and Chechako vein swarms. Core holes GSDC0824-26 drilled in 2008 were positioned to intercept and define mineralization on these structures in the footwall of the Scheuyemere vein swarm.

The shear zones at Tolovana typically contain either continuous or chopped south dipping quartz veins within the shears, at the footwall boundaries, at the hanging wall boundaries, or meandering throughout. Some auriferous quartz veins follow conjugate joint sets between shear zones. Mineralized quartz veins are typically sub-parallel to nearby shear zones and dip at similar angles. When in brittle rock units the veins typically are straight walled and at times break into stockwork, anastomosing through the rock units following sub parallel joint sets. Significant (+1 gpt) gold grades are concentrated in the quartz veins although anomalous low grade gold mineralization occurs in pervasively sericite-altered host rocks to a degree not commonly seen elsewhere on the Golden Summit project.

In the spring of 2008, Freegold initiated an exploration RAB drilling program at Tolovana, drilling a total of 15,718 feet in 218 RAB holes on six separate fences from 3/10/08 to 5/23/08 (Plate 1). RAB fences were drilled to test multiple shears and quartz veins known to exist to the north and south of mineralization discovered by 2007 RAB drilling. With the exception of Fence 20, all RAB drilling completed in 2008 was on extensions of fences drilled in 2007. Fence 20 was drilled near Bedrock Creek at the eastern edge of the Tolovana claim group to try to tie shear swarms at Tolovana with those previously identified on the Cleary Hill mine prospect. All RAB fences drilled in 2008 intercepted several significant grade-thickness intervals, some of which correlate with veins and shear zones encountered in previous RAB drilling and exploration trench channel sampling programs.

Over 63,000 strike feet of mineralized shear zones have been identified within and immediately adjacent to the Golden Summit project.

The major historic lode gold mines of the Golden Summit project derived their production primarily from northwest and northeast trending high angle, low sulfide, gold-polymetallic quartz veins and shear zones which transect what is now thought to be the mixed upper plate - lower plate rock package at Golden Summit. The majority of mineralized shear zones on the eastern end of the project trend N60W-80W and dip steeply to the southwest. Shear zones on the western end of the project area are predominately N60E-80E and dip steeply north. Shear zones in the central portion of the project (centred on the Cleary Hill mine) trend closer to east-west and appear to mark a transition from primarily northwest trending, south dipping shears to the east to primarily north dipping shears to the west. In addition, exploration activities conducted by Freegold have identified previously unrecognized shear zones trending N30-50W and due south. These shear zone possess significantly different metal suites than the N80W and N60E trending shears.

Drilling completed by Freegold on the Golden Summit project since 1991 includes 88,241 feet of core and reverse circulation in 214 holes and 80,825 feet of rotary air blast drilling in 2,028 holes. Drilling was conducted by third-party contractors in 1992, 1994-98, 2000, 2003, 2004 and 2006 through 2008 and consisted of diamond core drilling, down-hole hammer reverse circulation drilling and rotary air blast drilling (RAB). All drilling conducted during these programs was managed for Freegold by Avalon Development and was conducted by independent drilling contractors. Reverse circulation samples consisted of one-eighth splits of each 5-foot interval from holes ranging from 5 to 6.5 inches in diameter. Prior to 2008, all core samples were sawed into one-half splits of variable length depending on visible geological criteria. In 2008 whole core analysis was conducted. All rotary air blast samples consisted of 100% cut of either a 2.5-foot or a 3-foot composite interval from holes ranging from 3 to 3.5 inches in diameter.

The RAB drilling completed in 2006, 2007 and 2008 was contracted to Fairbanks Excavation Co. who supplied an Ingersoll Rand ECM 590 track mounted rotary air blast drill (RAB) for the program. This unit produces 2.5 inch to 4.5 inch diameter drill holes and features an Ingersoll Rand compressor that produces 250 cubic feet per of air per minute at 140 pounds per square inch air pressure. The automatic rod changer with 12 foot rods gives the drill up to 78 feet of mobile drill depth capability. Depending on drilling conditions, RAB holes at Cleary Hill were drilled with 3 inch or 3.5 inch percussion bits. A pneumatic hammer placed at the upper end of the drill mast helped pulverize material down hole. The drill pipe is a conventional single walled pipe with air traveling down the inside of the pipe and the sample traveling up the outside between the pipe and the hole wall. Vacuum suction provided by the compressor helps evacuate

samples from the hole after which the samples pass through a cyclone where they are collected in a sample bag inside a 5 gallon bucket. Prior to June 6, 2008, all sample intervals were 3 feet wide and lithologic samples were sieved from the cutting stream, washed and logged for each sample interval. The RAB samples collected after June 5, 2008 were collected following new sampling procedures instituted by Freegold Ventures (see Sampling Method and Approach for details). After June 6, 2008, all sample intervals were 2.5 feet wide, no lithologic samples were collected from RAB drill cuttings and no chip logging was completed on RAB intervals. During 2008 a total of 25,053 feet of RAB drilling was completed in 1,136 holes in the Cleary Hill area. All rotary air blast samples consisted of 100% cut of either a 2.5-foot or a 3-foot composite interval from holes ranging from 3 to 3.5 inches in diameter.

Colorado-based CNC Drilling was the core drilling contractor utilized in 2008 and operated a skid-mounted Atlas Copco CS 1000 diamond core drill housed in a 20 foot long conex unit, with a second conex used to house drill rods. Fairbanks Excavation prepared all drill pads and supplied the water truck for drilling operations. Drilling consisted of 23 holes totaling 6,757 feet over a 51-day period during February, March and April. CNC’s equipment and personnel performed as expected and provided good quality core except in highly fractured intervals where recovery dropped below the 90% level targeted at the outset of the program.

A more detailed description of the drill programs completed by the Company is provided in the Exploration section of this Form 20F.

Rock, soil and drill sampling methods and procedures utilized in 1992 through 2008 followed established industry guidelines for this level of mineral exploration work.

All reverse circulation and rotary air blast samples were quick-logged on-site by an experienced geologist and later detail logged using representative chip samples from each 2.5, 3 or 5 foot sample interval. Reverse circulation samples were one-eight to one-quarter split, depending on hole diameter while 100% of RAB cuttings were collected and shipped to the geochemical lab.

Since 1997 all rock and soil geochemical samples collected were described in the field and located using hand-held global positioning system (GPS) methods. Data from each sample was then entered into a digital GIS-database for later interpretation. Channel samples collected on the project were collected along the trench floor or rib using a rock pick and chisel as required. Channel sampling using a power saw was attempted but abandoned due to the heavy weathering and penetrative cleavage of metamorphic rocks on the project, both of which made such sampling difficult and potentially unreliable.

Since 1992 all samples collected from the Golden Summit project were transported by Avalon Development employees directly from the field to Avalon’s secure warehouse in Fairbanks. Avalon personnel checked each sample shipment to insure that samples in hand agreed with sample totals in field notebook. Once the integrity of each sample shipment was established the samples were picked up by representatives of an independent analytical laboratory (Bondar Clegg, ALS Chemex or Alaska Assay) for analytical processing.

Exploration RAB drilling samples collected during the 2006 and 2007 and from January 1 through June 5,2008 RAB drilling program consisted of a 100% split of the drill cuttings. Samples were collected by Avalon Development personnel and weighed from 4 kilograms to 54 kilograms, averaging about 7 kilograms. The samples were weighed and logged on-site and transported daily to a locked warehouse at Avalon Development’s office complex for subsequent pick-up, preparation and analysis by ALS Chemex and/or Alaska Assay Laboratories.

Definition RAB samples collected after June 5, 2008 were collected following new sampling procedures instituted by Freegold Ventures. This new sampling protocol consisted of collecting all samples on 2.5 foot intervals and passing 100% of the sample through a Jones-type splitter until the sample intended for analysis weighed between 250 and 500 grams. Depending on the volume of drill cuttings coming from the drill interval, this meant splitting the sample between 4 and 7 times (averaging 5 splits) to reach the desired sample weight. Duplicate samples for QA/QC were collected after every 45 feet of drilling. The final samples

destined for assay were then delivered to Freegold’s on-site preparation laboratory where they were weighed, crushed by Freegold employees and then picked up by Alaska Assay Laboratories for pulverizing and gravimetric fire assay analysis for gold.

Definition RAB drill samples collected in the Cleary North RAB were collected in the same manner as outlined above for definition RAB samples however, samples collected from the Cleary North area were transported to Avalon Development for insertion of sample blanks, and standards prior to submittal to Alaska Assay Laboratories.

2008 Core Sampling Technique: The following is a proposed procedure manual for whole core digestion used on the 2008 Golden Summit project core drilling program.

Core was moved by Avalon from the drill rig to the secure logging facilities at each shift change.

Core boxes were inspected for proper labeling and core in the boxes is inspected to insure that the core was placed in the boxes at the drill rig in the proper order with the proper footage markings on the core run blocks.

Core was moved to logging tables and placed in order by box number such that the lowest numbered box (with the shallowest drill core) is on the far left side of the logging bench and while the highest numbered box (with the deepest drill core) is on the far right side of the logging bench.

Core was washed with a spray bottle to remove polymer or other drill mud. Due to the presence of coarse, free gold, core was not washed with a brush since this could smear coarse gold particles from a mineralized to an unmineralized interval.

Core recovery (ratio of core recovered in a given core run to the actual length of the core run) was calculated and marked on the logging sheet for each core run interval pulled by the drilling company. This information was entered in the logs as a percent-recovered.

The RQD, or Rock Quality Designation was calculated for each core run. The RQD is the combined length of all whole core segment in each core run that were greater than 10 cm (4 inches) or longer than twice the core diameter, divided by the total length of the recorded core run multiplied by 100 (expressed in % form). The total length of core includes all lost core sections. Breaks in the core that result from the drilling process or extraction of the core from the core barrel are usually fresh looking and have rough edges. These mechanical breaks were ignored while calculating RQD. For the NQ2 drill core drilled at Golden Summit (diameter 1.995 inches), samples qualifying for addition in the RQD calculation would be 4 inches or more in length. RQD information was recorded in percentage form on the logging sheet for each core run interval pulled by the drilling company.

The drill core was logged by a senior geologist with experience in the rock type, alteration and mineralization. Details relating to lithology, structure, alteration and mineralization were recorded systematically. Lithologic details were compiled on paper logs, and later converted to digital format. Structural details were measured and their angle to core axis recorded in the log. Details relating to the thickness, angle and other aspects were recorded in the log. Hydrothermal alteration features, such as quartz or sericite alteration, were noted in the logs and details relating to its extent and intensity were recorded. Hydrothermal mineralization was recorded in the log. Details recorded include morphology, mineralogy and color of quartz veins, sulfide mineralogy, form and abundance (in volume %), metallic oxide mineralogy, form and relative abundance, and any other feature related to gold, gold-pathfinder or other metallic mineralization. The geologist took close-up digital photographs of unique or otherwise significant features described above.

Following logging, the geologist selected sample intervals for geochemical analyses. Selection of sample intervals utilized all the visual rock information gathered by the logger as well as any information gathered through the use of additional tools such as an XRF hand held analyzer, hand held geophysical tools, ultraviolet lamp or any other analytical tool that provided additional information about the geologic environment and mineralization. Sample intervals did not cross core recovery block boundaries. Sample intervals were no longer than 5 feet in length and no shorter than 0.5 feet in length. The minimum core sample length was predicated on

obtaining sufficient sample from which to create a 500 gram pulp. The selection of intervals for geochemical analysis focused on selecting the shortest sample interval that the accumulated logging information indicates was a unique zone, structure or area of mineralization. Similarly, wider zones that appear to be gold mineralized should also be sampled as a unit. Wooden blocks, designating the sample number and starting footage mark, were placed in the core boxes to guide the sampler. These sample blocks were marked in red while core footage run blocks were marked in black. Care was taken in assigning sample numbers to allow for insertion of blanks and standards into the sample stream. Blanks and standards comprised approximately 10% of the samples submitted to the lab from any given drill hole.

The core was digitally photographed. In this process the core was wetted to enhance picture quality and photographed under high intensity electric lights with plain light spectrum bulbs. Each core box was photographed with a placard denoting hole number and footage contained in the box. Core run block and sample interval blocks were plainly visible in the pictures. Digital resolution was +5 mega-pixels to insure extremely high quality results. In addition to photographing each core box, close-up or macro photos were taken by the core logger of any obviously mineralized intervals, significant alteration or textures, noteworthy lithologic contacts, distinctive structural zones, etc. The core logger kept an accurate written log of the footage and hole number of these macro photos crossed referenced to the digital file name. Once a given hole is photographed completely, the file name of the macro photos was changed to reflect the hole number and footage of each macro photo.

Once all hole photos from a given hole or part of a hole were taken, they were checked for quality and completeness by Ken Wolf, Avalon’s QA/QC manager. Unclear or incomplete photos were re-photographed, re-checked and added to the complete digital database for each hole.

The original hand-written drill core logs were scanned to a digital format (Adobe pdf) and the resulting scans checked for clarity and completeness. Hard copy hand drill logs were converted to a digital drill log format (Excel format) to allow their use in GIS and/or resource estimation software. The Excel file was checked for accuracy and completeness against the original hand written drill log by a third party and any discrepancies rectified and errors or omissions corrected. Where necessary, the core logger referred to the core to make corrections, additions or other changes.

Once QA/QC checks were completed on core logs and core photos, a digital copy of the core logs and core photos was burned to a DVD and stored off-site. In addition, these data were stored on at least 2 computers in two separate buildings on Avalon’s premises and were transmitted to Freegold via ftp or email.

Once all of the above steps were completed and verified by the Geologist, each marked geochemical sample interval was extracted from the core box and 100% of the core from that interval was placed in a canvas sample bag bearing the sample number on the sample interval block. Extra care will be taken to insure that only rock and rock fragments from the proper interval were collected in the sample bag. This sampling was done by a two person team who cross-referenced sample numbers of intervals on the core logs to the sample blocks and the sample numbers on the sample bags. The individual sample bags were sealed and stored in Avalon’s warehouse for subsequent batch shipping to the geochemical lab.

Once a core box was emptied of the core in it, the core box was discarded. Core boxes were not reused to eliminate the possibility of contaminating subsequent drill core from previously used boxes.

Ken Wolf and the core logger completed the geochemical laboratory submittal paperwork. Bagged and labeled samples were then be loaded into large nylon poly-sacks capable of holding 2,000 pounds. Representatives of the geochemical lab collected the poly-sacks and handled all sample preparation and analysis from that point forward. The minimum instructions required for each sample shipment included:

Name or description of Au analysis procedure (Fire Assay, gravimetric finish) and description of over-limit condition and action required by laboratory.

During the period 1992 to 2004 sample preparation was completed by ALS Chemex Labs and Bondar Clegg Ltd. at their facilities in Fairbanks, Alaska. During 2005, trench samples were prepared by Alaska Assay Labs, a Fairbanks facility that completed crushing and pulverizing to Avalon’s specifications. During the period 1992 to August 2006 sample analysis was completed by ALS Chemex Labs and Bondar Clegg Ltd. (prior to 2002) at their facilities in Vancouver, B.C. Samples collected from September 2006 to present have been prepared and analyzed entirely by Alaska Assay Labs at their Fairbanks facility.

Except for RAB samples collected after June 5, 2008, duplicate samples were inserted on a one for ten basis beginning in 1996. Blanks and standards were used in 1997-1998 while blanks were inserted on a 1 for 25 basis in 2000 and 2002 through 2008. Commercially prepared standards were introduced on a 1 to 50 basis during 2004 - 2007. During all programs, Avalon Development collected, logged and retained the samples collected in the field until turned over to a commercial laboratory representative. Selected sample pulps were reanalyzed by metallic screen methods to quantify nugget effect in high-grade samples or where visible gold was noted during sampling.

The majority of the work on the Golden Summit property since 2006 was carried out under the supervision of Michael Gross, VP Exploration for Freegold Ventures. Geological work was conducted by Avalon Development Inc.

The data obtained in conjunction with all the work performed is considered to be reliable.

Except for RAB samples collected after June 5, 2008, all samples collected on the Golden Summit project were retained at Avalon’s secure warehouse facility in Fairbanks until picked up by representatives Alaska Assay, ALS Chemex or Bondar Clegg. Sample preparations procedures varied over time and between the three facilities however, analytical work consisted of gold by fire assay with atomic absorption or gravimetric finish plus a variable multi-element suite analyzed by inductively coupled plasma emission spectroscopy (ICP) methods. Prior to 2001 all ICP samples were prepared using two acid digestion procedures. Multi-element analyses conducted in 2001 through 2008 used four acid digestion procedures for all samples submitted for ICP analysis. All gold analyses completed in 2008 were by lead-collection fire assay with gravimetric finish. Sample pulps for all samples collected from 1996 to 2004 and after September 2006 have been retained at Avalon Development’s Fairbanks warehouse facility. Sample pulps for 2005 were retained by Freegold at their Vancouver office. Sample rejects from 2005 and 2006 are stored at Avalon Development's facilities in Fairbanks while rejects from 2007 and 2008 are stored on the Golden Summit project.

For RAB samples collected after June 5, 2008, the final samples destined for assay were then delivered by Avalon personnel to Freegold’s on-site preparation laboratory where they were weighed, crushed by Freegold employees and then picked up by Alaska Assay Laboratories for pulverizing and gravimetric fire assay analysis for gold. Details are not available to the authors relating to the preparation procedures, QA/QA and analytical packages utilized by Freegold for RAB samples collected after June 5, 2008.

There currently are no mineral resources on the Golden Summit project that comply with the CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves Definitions and Guidelines adopted by CIM Council on August 20, 2000.

The Golden Summit is surrounded by over a dozen small to moderate size properties owned by small companies and individuals. Several of these properties contain old mines and known-gold-bearing prospects (Freeman, 1992). Several of these properties were leased to Freegold during the period 1992 to 2005 but were

returned to their respective owners during that period and no longer are part of the Golden Summit project. While some of these properties contain mineralization that is similar to that known to exist on the Golden Summit project, a discussion of these prospects is outside the scope of this summary.

Prior to early 2007 Freegold had completed no metallurgical or petrographic analyses on samples from the Cleary Hill or Tolovana prospects. Metallic screen analyses were conducted on selected samples of the Cleary Hill mine drill samples in 2003 and 2004. Metallic screen analyses were conducted on high grade samples from the 2002 Cleary Hill trenching program and from 60 channel and 21 high grade grab samples from the 2005 Cleary Hill trenching program. This work indicated that below about 1 gpt gold, standard –150 mesh fire assay results are nearly identical to weighted average metallic screen assay results suggesting nugget effect is not present to any significant degree in lower grade samples. However, as overall sample grades increase, metallic screen analyses display an increasing disparity between standard fire assay grades and weighted average metallic screen fire assay results. These results suggest a significant nugget effect can be expected in higher grade samples, particularly those with coarse visible gold.

In January 2007 Freegold submitted approximately 7 composite samples of run-of-mine material from the 2006 bulk sample pits to McLelland Labs of Reno, Nevada for acid base accounting tests. These tests were required by the Alaska Department of Conservation for solid waste disposal permits that were issued in mid-2007. These acid base accounting analyses indicate that 5 of the bulk sample material was net-acid neutral and did not pose any acid generating threat. Two of the bulks sample composites returned values indicating a slight acid generating potential however, the values suggested by the analyses were well under benchmark levels that would require special handling procedures under permits issued by the State of Alaska.

In January 2007 Freegold submitted approximately 600 pounds of run-of-mine material from the 2006 bulk sample pits to Knelson Gravity Solutions in Langley, British Columbia. These samples were submitted to determine the effectiveness of gravity recovery on various size fractions. Results of these tests were not available to the author at the time this summary was completed.

In the summer and fall of 2007 Freegold permitted and constructed a 1,200 ton per day gravity recovery circuit in order to recover the gold from the bulk samples (Manz, 2008). The final commissioning of the plant occurred late in the processing season, and only a small number of the stockpiles from the 2006 bulk sampling effort were crushed, sampled and processed before freezing temperatures forced the winter closing of the plant. This plant was upgraded and commenced operation again in the middle of 2008, operating continuously until freezing temperatures forced the winter closing of the plant in October 2008. Analysis of the materials processed in 2007 and 2008 was in progress as this report was being prepared.

Although several areas of the Golden Summit project merit future exploration effort, the initial near term (5-year) focus of exploration at Golden Summit will be the western half of the project area. Results from this portion of the project will help guide work on the eastern half the property. The multi-year exploration program recommended below is intended to be conducted in a phased approach where each phase of work recommended is dependent on the success of preceding phases of work. Based on preliminary field, laboratory and literature studies completed to date, the following recommendations for future work on the western Golden Summit project are warranted:

General: Historic mining and more recent exploration work conducted by Freegold at Cleary Hill mine suggest the presence of a series of vein swarms containing high grade veins and shear zones with good down-dip and strike potential. Trenching, RAB drilling, core drilling and bulk sampling conducted in 2006, 2007 and 2008 revealed several new high grade veins extending from the footwall of the Cleary Hill vein on the north the Wyoming shear on the south. These efforts have indicated that both high grade and bulk tonnage targets exist at Cleary Hill and these targets are open to expansion along strike and at depth.

Recommendations for work in 2009 include backhoe/dozer trenching, core drilling, exploration and definition RAB drilling and bulk sampling as outlined below. The collective goal of these programs should be to reduce the entire timeframe, including target identification, target definition and bulk sampling, to 30 days or less. The recommendations to accomplish this work in the proposed time-frame are presented below.

Backhoe/Dozer Trenching: Over the course of the last three years it has become apparent that backhoe and/or dozer trenching followed by hand channel sampling is an unreliable method of determining the grade of gold mineralization in shears zones and veins at the Cleary Hill mine prospect in particular, and most likely, at the Golden Summit project in general. The extreme natural grade variability of the mineralization, nugget effect in high grade zones and the highly fractured nature of the mineralization and host rock all contribute to decreasing sample reliability. While estimating grade of gold mineralization exposed by backhoe and/or dozer trenches is not recommended, identification of prospective shear zones, veins and alteration is most efficiently accomplished with a backhoe and/or dozer. Backhoe/dozer trenches should be spaced at 50 to 100 feet along strike to confirm the strike and width of mineralization on the target structure. Recommendations in 2009 include backhoe and/or dozer trenching at regular intervals across the strike of prospective bulk sample targets. Once this work has identified the location, strike and dip of mineralized veins and shears, exploration RAB drilling should be conducted. Minimal land clearing and site preparation during backhoe/dozer trenching also is recommended as a cost and time-reduction methodology. Primary targets for this work in the Cleary Hill area include the southeastern extension of the Beistline structure and the footwall zone of the Cleary Hill vein from the Penrose adit to the Beistline pit area.

Exploratory RAB Drilling: Additional exploratory RAB drilling at Cleary Hill will be critical to identification and quantification of high grade and bulk tonnage zones. Although the technique applied in the past of drilling on long fences perpendicular to general trends of the strike of known mineralized structures has worked well to define continuity on these structures over long strike distances, the experienced gained at Cleary Hill will allow the focus to be placed on establishing continuity on known zones, both along and across strike. Exploratory RAB drilling in 2009 should concentrate on several areas of the prospect, including the area between trenches BST0609 and BST0610, the Beistline shear southeast of the Beistline shaft and the footwall veins of the Beistline shear northwest of the Beistline bulk sample pit.

RAB drilling on trench BST0610 should be completed to help define mineralization on all sections of the Fence 1 vein swarm and to help define mineralization at the projected intersection of the Fence 1 vein swarm, Wackwitz, and B1 structures. This RAB fence should be approximately 360 feet in length, with holes spaced 15 feet apart, and continue north from the intersection of the abovementioned structures to the new Beistline pit haul road. This will allow RAB to intercept the eastward strike extension of the high grade vein/shear discovered on the south end of Fence 1 cut #3 in 2007. This fence should extend far enough south to intercept the eastern strike projection of the Fence 1 vein swarm.

RAB drilling in recommended for trench BST0609 to define mineralization on the Fence 1 vein swarm, B1, East Fault/Cleary Hill vein-Beistline, and possibly Wackwitz structures. This RAB fence should be approximately 290 feet in length, extending north far enough to reach the Discovery shaft. Results from core and definition RAB drilling in 2008 suggest that the Discovery shaft is positioned on a high grade “blow-out” on a shear zone that is sub-parallel to, and 60 feet north of, the East Fault/Cleary Hill vein - Beistline structure. RAB drilling at the north end of this proposed fence will test the structure at Discovery shaft and perhaps other shear zones in the footwall of the East Fault/Cleary Hill vein-Beistline structure.

Following backhoe/dozer trenching and, assuming positive results from this work, RAB exploration drilling should be conducted north of the Cleary Hill/East fault – Beistline structures to determine the potential of these areas for both bulk tonnage and high grade mineralization. Previous work in this part of the property is limited to auger soil sampling and RC drilling conducted in 1998 (Freeman and others, 1998). In addition, airborne magnetics modeling conducted in 2008 suggests the possible presence of favorable structural traps at the contact of the upper plate Chatanika Terrane and lower plate Fairbanks Schist (Freeman, written comm.. 2008. The first fence is recommended for the area east of the Timberline shaft and north of the 2008 Beistline bulk sample pit (Plate 1). The length and orientation of the initial RAB fence will depend on results from exploration trenching conducted prior to RAB drilling. Pending results from this fence, additional fences may be drilled across and/or along strike.

Following backhoe/dozer trenching and, assuming positive results from this work, RAB exploration drilling should be conducted southeast on the eastern strike extension of the Beistline shear to determine the potential of these areas for both bulk tonnage and high grade mineralization. Previous work in this part of the property is limited to auger soil sampling, widely spaced dozer trenches and RC drilling conducted in 1998 (Freeman and others, 1998). This work suggested the present of gold mineralization in the Beistline shear as well as mineralization encountered in drilling in the hangingwall of the Beistline shear that is controlled by structures not yet seen on surface. The length and orientation of the initial RAB fence will depend on results from exploration trenching conducted prior to RAB drilling. Pending results from this fence, additional fences may be drilled across and/or along strike.

Definition RAB Drilling: The resumption of definition RAB drilling at Golden Summit will depend on results of initial exploratory RAB drilling and exploration trenching. To reduce costs and time spent, future definition RAB drilling will need to be focused on smaller grid layouts with triangular hole patterns. Similar patterns were utilized at the Cleary North grid in late 2008. Definition RAB fences should be oriented along the strike of, and in the hangingwall of, the identified target structures. Stripping of overburden to the bedrock surface was conducted in previous RAB drilling programs, however this process increases costs for both the planned RAB drilling and for required reclamation after completion of the program. Future RAB fence preparation should minimize disturbance along the planned fences and when possible, should be conducted in winter months to allow drilling to take place through frozen overburden.

Two previously bulk-sampled areas of the Cleary Hill mine prospect, the East Fault/Cleary Hill and Wackwitz veins, warrant definition RAB drilling in 2009. Definition drilling similar in pattern and style to that recommended for 2009 was employed at the East fault/Cleary Hill vein in 2008. Drilling should be continued from the easternmost point of bulk sampling on the Cleary Hill vein cut to the Beistline definition RAB grid, a distance of 300 feet. This grid would require 45 holes for three lines of drilling, cover a single level of bulk sampling and extend the Cleary Hill vein pit level 1 east to the Beistline pit. In any area along this drill pattern where other shear zones or veins converge with the East Fault/Cleary Hill vein from the west, the grid may require expansion to define these potentially well mineralized intersection zones.

The Wackwitz vein and adjacent Currey shear zone have never been drilled with an exploratory RAB program. Positive results have been returned from previous core drilling, trench channel sampling and 2006 bulk sampling, and indicate this vein system is high grade (+5 gpt) and remarkably consistent, both physically and geochemically, along strike. Limited prep-work will be required to drill the hangingwall of the Wackwitz and Currey zones. Prep-work will involve construction of access ramps between the Currey shear (southern-most of the two targets) and the overburden and organic stockpiles located 30 feet away from the Currey shear. The strike distance of surface mineralization for the combined Wackwitz and Currey zones is 500 feet between the 2007 Fence 4 on the west and trench WZ0504 on the east. Mineralization is up to 70 feet in width and will require 8 drill lines with 30-35 holes per line to allow complete definition of the Wackwitz and Currey zones. The Wackwitz and Currey zones remain open along strike to the west so additional expansion to the west may be warranted.

RC/Core Drilling: In the event significant areas of bulk tonnage gold mineralization are outlined by exploration and definition RAB drilling, deeper drilling beyond the limit of the RAB drill (>78 feet,) should be conducted to allow resource estimations. Because of the relatively high cost of core drilling, slow rate of advance and the possibility of poor core recovery in zones of potentially high grade mineralization, RC drilling is the recommended method for drilling above the water table. Past drilling has indicated that water table depth varies in the Cleary Hill mine area but is generally at 150-200 feet below surface. The water table depth varies with season (deeper in winter, closer to surface in summer) but is not always related to topography because it is controlled by structures, not by a permeable or porous aquifer. Given the seasonal variation in water table depth, RC drilling is recommended for winter months (November to April).

Drill hole spacing, azimuth and inclination are all variable depending on the strike, width and physical characteristics of the various target zones. Evaluation of the 2008 core drilling at Cleary Hill suggests that 100 foot spacings are too coarse. The extreme grade variability suggest that RAB definition drill hole

variograms should be utilized to determine the optimum hole spacing, azimuth and inclination for each resource site targeted for RC drilling.

The only area outlined to date at Cleary Hill that has potential for bulk tonnage gold mineralization is the Fence 1 vein swarm (Plates 1, 3 and 4). Variogram analysis should be conducted on all previous RAB and core drilling from this area to determine the optimum hole spacing, azimuth and inclination. The goal of this drilling would be to evaluate mineralization from surface to at least 200 feet from the Fence 1 area to the convergence of the Fence 1 vein swarm and the East Fault-Cleary Hill vein system.

Bulk Sampling: Bulk sampling at Golden Summit over the course of 2008 evolved from pit to pit to become more efficient and effective at the close of the season. The recommendation for future bulk sampling at Golden Summit is to improve on the technique employed at the close of the season in the Cleary Hill North pit. This was the pit which had the most favorable strip ratio relative to other pits sampled in 2008. Bulk sampling of the Cleary Hill vein pit in October of 2008 progressed beyond definition RAB drilling and became an exploration/bulk sample cut from that point forward. This resulted in a significant degradation of the strip ratio and increase in cost of extraction per ton of grade as the pit was widened in places to explore for high grade material. Future bulk sampling should be conducted along narrow, well controlled definition RAB fences that are oriented along strike. This will enable bulk sampling strip ratios to be reduced significantly from that achieved at the Cleary Hill vein pit of 2008 and will afford an attendant reduction in time and cost.

Other specific bulk sample targets for 2009 can not be recommended at this point in time. Additional analytical and mass balance work by Freegold’s production staff is in progress and will need to be completed before final evaluations can be made on the bulk samples collected in 2006, 2007 and 2008 and processed in 2007 and 2008. Once head, tail and recovered grade evaluations are made, additional resource RC drilling may be warranted in one or more bulk sample areas in addition to the Fence 1 are recommended above.

All of the Newsboy’s previous production came from above the 350 foot level of the mine (Figure 6). Two old unregistered maps are all that remains of the subsurface mine records from the Newsboy. Previous production of approximately 40,000 ounces of +1 opt material was mined from a northeast striking, steeply north dipping vein with mining widths reaching up to 14 feet thick near the shaft on the 115 foot level. Stockwork veins apparently were more common at Newsboy than discrete single quartz veins and gold mineralization was present in sulfide-bearing country rock which hosted the shear zones. Post-mineral cross-faults clearly plagued previous mine operators and present a significant challenge to future exploration. Because of our limited knowledge of the structural setting at Newsboy, a three stage exploration program is recommended. Initial work should include compilation of all surface and subsurface records for the Newsboy area. This GIS database will assist in targeting subsequent ground geophysics an drilling. The estimated cost of this work is $25,000. Once the GIS database is compiled, ground geophysics (NSAMT or CSAMT?) capable of defining structural details to at least 1,000 feet below surface should be conducted. Limited resistivity surveys over the Cleary Hill area suggest resistivity highs are associated with significant vein systems. In addition, previously flown airborne geophysics could be used to help model major lithologic or structural locks in the Newsboy area. Combined airborne geophysical re-interpretation and follow-up ground geophysics is budgeted at $30,000. Once these data are evaluated, RAB drilling over the known mineralized strike length of the Newsboy vein should be conducted. Drilling should be managed in a similar fashion as recommended on the Cleary Hill prospect. A minimum 5,000 feet of closely spaced RAB drilling should be completed with an all-in cost of $175,000 ($35 per foot). In addition, a six-hole, 6,000 foot diamond drill program is recommended to explore below the 350 level of the mine on three 2-hole fences. This program will be expedited by the fact that, unlike the Cleary Hill or Tolovana veins, the Newsboy vein dips to the north and topography drops off in the same direction thereby making it less expensive to test deeper levels of the vein system. Down-hole wedging also should be considered as a cost-effective alternative to drilling all six holes from surface. Total estimated drilling phase cost is $750,000 ($125 per foot).

The Saddle zone sits in a vein swarm which hosts the highest density of veins, across strike, of any area of the Golden Summit project. This prospect, drilled with conventional rotary methods by IMC and with reverse circulation methods by BP Minerals, contains a number of distinct high-grade veins, including the McCarty (Chatham), American Eagle (Kawalita-Christina), Henry Ford, Pioneer, Antimony, Pennsylvania and Ebberts veins. Historic records for this work are available and portions of it are already in the Golden Summit GIS database. The remaining hard copy records (mostly drill hole and trench geochemistry data and underground data from the American Eagle mine) should be converted to a digital format and added to the GIS database. Following data compilation, one or more RAB drill lines should be targeted at the Saddle zone to determine the number and location of gold-bearing veins and shear zones across the strike of the zone. This across-strike width extends for approximately 2700 feet from the McCarty shaft on the southwest to the Pennsylvania shaft on the NE. Existing roads and old reclaimed trenches in the area will facilitate this work. RAB ho0les should e drilled on 20 foot centers to a standard TD of 78 feet. Samples should be collected on 3-foot spacing and analyzed for gold by fire assay with gravimetric finish and for a multi-element suite using ICP methods with 4-acidf digestion. The estimated cost of the GIS compilation work, dozer preparation work, completion of at least 135 RAB holes over 2700 feet of drill line (at $35 per foot), analytical costs and all labor costs is approximately $500,000.

General: Recent work at Tolovana has revealed the presence of mineralized structural elements not previously documented on the prospect. Shear and vein strike orientations are variable over short distances making prediction and correlation of veins over long distances unreliable. In addition, extreme grade variability over short distances make correlation of structures from trenches and RAB drill fence equally unreliable. While steeply south-dipping mineralized shears and veins striking 060-080 degrees are prevalent at Tolovana, another set of northwest trending mineralized structures also are present at Tolovana. These shears appear to intersect or converge with the northeast-trending structures. There is no known historical record of mineralized structures at Tolovana trending in the 100-130 degree range. Exploration success at Tolovana will require accurate mapping of these trends to better understand the relationship between the northeast and northwest trending structures and to predict prospective exploration targets at Tolovana. Recommendations for work in 2009 include backhoe/dozer trenching, exploration and definition RAB drilling and bulk sampling as outlined below. The collective goal of these programs should be to reduce the entire timeframe, including target identification, target definition and bulk sampling, to 30 days or less. The recommendations to accomplish this work in the proposed time-frame are presented below.

Backhoe/Dozer Trenching: Over the course of the last three years it has become apparent that backhoe and/or dozer trenching followed by hand channel sampling is an unreliable method of determining the grade of gold mineralization in shears zones and veins on the Golden Summit project. The extreme natural grade variability of the mineralization, nugget effect in high grade zones and the highly fractured nature of the mineralization and host rock all contribute to decreasing sample reliability. While estimating grade of gold mineralization exposed by backhoe and/or dozer trenches is not recommended, identification of prospective shear zones, veins and alteration is most efficiently accomplished with a backhoe and/or dozer. Backhoe/dozer trenches should be spaced at 50 to 100 feet along strike to confirm the strike and width of mineralization on the target structure. Recommendations in 2009 include backhoe and/or dozer trenching at regular intervals across the strike of prospective bulk sample targets. Once this work has identified the location, strike and dip of mineralized veins and shears, exploration RAB drilling should be conducted. Minimal land clearing and site preparation during backhoe/dozer trenching also is recommended as a cost and time-reduction methodology. Primary targets for this work in the western strike extent of the Tolovana and Scheuyemere vein systems, extending from Fence 6 to west of Willow Creek to the Parenteau adit.

Exploratory RAB Drilling: Additional exploratory RAB drilling at Tolovana will be critical to identification and quantification of high grade and bulk tonnage zones. Although the technique applied in the past of drilling on long fences perpendicular to general trends of the strike of known mineralized structures has worked well to define continuity on these structures over long strike distances, the experienced gained at

Cleary Hill will allow the focus to be placed on establishing continuity on known zones, both along and across strike. Exploratory RAB drilling in 2009 should concentrate on the western strike extent of the Tolovana and Scheuyemere vein systems, extending from Fence 6 to west of Willow Creek to the Parenteau and Will adits (approximately 650 feet). A single RAB drill line positioned between the Tolovana shaft/False adit and Fence 6 would help define the now open mineralization which exists between Fence 6 and Willow Creek. An additional RAB Fence on the west side of Willow Creek above the Parenteau and Willow adits would determine the extent and grade of mineralization into an area with no recent exploration drilling or trenching.

Definition RAB Drilling: The initiation of definition RAB drilling at Tolovana will depend on results of initial exploratory RAB drilling and exploration trenching. To reduce costs and time spent, future definition RAB drilling will need to be focused on smaller grid layouts with triangular hole patterns. Similar patterns were utilized successfully at the Cleary North grid in late 2008. Definition RAB fences should be oriented along the strike of, and in the hangingwall of, the identified target structures. Stripping of overburden to the bedrock surface was conducted in previous RAB drilling programs, however this process increases costs for both the planned RAB drilling and for required reclamation after completion of the program. Future RAB fence preparation should minimize disturbance along the planned fences and when possible, should be conducted in winter months to allow drilling to take place through frozen overburden. Definition RAB drilling is recommended for The Fence 17 and Fence 6 areas, both of which have exploration RAB drilling results to guide definition drilling hole placement.

Bulk sampling is recommended in 2009 for the Fence 17 area at Tolovana. A cut 10 foot deep and 40 feet wide extending from the 2007 Fence 17 RAB drill pattern, north along Fence 17 extension, and approximately 300 feet in length, would allow bulk sampling of the entire Scheuyemere-Tolovana vein swarm. Excavation at Fence 17 will allow selective bulk sampling of nearly every known mineralized structure trending across the crest of the Tolovana ridge and would facilitate accurate mapping of most mineralized structures currently known to exist at Tolovana hill. This would also help predict intersections of high grade structures which likely exist to the east and west of the crest of Tolovana ridge. Because significant clearing of overburden has already been accomplished in and around Fence 17 and surface grade is gentle at this location, the bulk sample/exploration trench positioned at the crest of Tolovana hill could effectively be expanded to the west or east if mineralization in the initial pit warranted further excavation.

Bulk sampling also is recommended in the Fence 6 area extending east along the Scheuyemere vein toward the Scheuyemere shaft. Previous excavations have left a ready-made bench at the Tolovana pit which will facilitate bulk sampling with little additional ground preparation. Multiple gold-bearing veins are exposed in the face of the Tolovana pit and Fence 6 RAB drilling results indicates the presence of multiple gold-bearing veins on strike with and in the hangingwall of the vein swarm exposed in the Tolovana pit. Initial excavations should commence at the current Tolovana pit wall and proceed eastward for approximately 100 feet. Pit width should be dictated by RAB drilling results and pit face panning but pit widths should be kept to a bare minimum required to efficiently extract and load bulk sample material.

Pursuant to the Company submitting a feasibility report, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement whereby 60% of all further costs spent on the property were the responsibility of the Company. The joint venture assumed the requirements to pay US$250,000 to underlying optionors (paid), US$4 per month for each acre acquired (approximately US$10,000 per year [paid to date]) and US$24,000 per year (US$6,000 annually [paid to date] with the remaining US$18,000 deferred for payment upon commencement of commercial production). The accumulated contingent liability for lease payments due on commencement of commercial production is US$468,000. In 2007, the Company entered into an agreement whereby in consideration for the conversion of the 4% net returns royalty to a 1.5% NSR, the Company agreed to advance the accumulated lease payments over 4 years and waive its right to defer US$18,000 per year in lease payments. The Company is now responsible for making US$24,000 per year in lease payments. In the event that the Company does not make the total accrued lease payments, the lease holders shall retain the 4% net returns royalty, the Company will remain responsible for making the US$24,000 annual lease payments and the accumulated payments under the conversion agreement of US$118,000 will remain as a reduction against the US$468,000 accumulated contingent liability.

By agreement dated 17 April 2001, the Company acquired the remaining 40% portion of the joint venture interest and 100% of the shares of Ican Minerals, Inc. and Canu Resources, Inc. for 500,000 shares of the Company (issued). The Company now owns a 100% interest in the Almaden Property, subject to underlying lease agreements.

The property is also subject to a 1% NSR if the average price of gold is less than US$425 per ounce and 2% if the average price of gold is equal to or greater than US$425 per ounce

The following text where italicized is excerpted from a Report entitled Executive Summary Report for the Almaden Gold Property, Washington County, Idaho by Avalon Development Corporation and J. D. Graham & Associates Ltd dated March 15^th, 2006 filed on SEDAR. All references noted within the text can be found in the references section of this report.

The Almaden mining property is located approximately 13 miles east of Weiser, the county seat of Washington County, in western Idaho (Figure 2-1). The property is situated at the crest and on the western side of Nutmeg Mountain, a prominent topographic high in the area. The property consists of twelve patented lode claims and 141 unpatented lode claims, as well as leased private land, in sections 28, 29, 32, and 33, Township 11 North, Range 3 West, sections 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, Township 10 North, Range 3 West. Mineral rights to the various claims and fee ground cover a total of approximately 2,980 acres, or 1,242 hectares.

The 12 patented claims at Almaden are the Sly Park 2 – 5, Missouri, Ibex, Red Rose, Sandstone, Weiser, Rimrock, and Weiser Cove No 1. They are leased from H. Davies and are known as the Davies Mining Lease. The unpatented claims are the IA #1 - #87 group, located in 1979 by Homestake Mining Co., the CR #1 – #15, #18 - #21, #26 - #27, and #29 - #39 group located by Canu Resources in 1986, and the AG #1 - #22 group acquired from Almaden Gold Inc. in 1997. These groups consist of 141 unpatented mining claims.

Private property under lease from Chrestesen amounts to approximately 240 acres, and from H.& D. Davies is approximately 240 acres and includes 12 patented claims.

Mineral rights in this part of Idaho are administered by the US Bureau of Land Management (federal claims). Annual rents of US$125 per claim are due and payable by August 31 of each year for unpatented federal mining claims. Total 2006-2007 rents due for federal claims total US$17,625. Claim rentals are paid in lieu of annual labor for unpatented federal claims. All claims and leases on the Almaden project currently are in good standing. There currently are no unusual social, political or environmental encumbrances to mining on the project. Other than the 12 patented mining claims and private leased lands, both of which have been surveyed, the claims of the Almaden project have not been surveyed by a registered land or mineral surveyor and there is no State or federal law or regulation requiring such surveying. Survey plats for all patented mining claims are open to public inspection at the Bureau of Land Management. Permits for future work will be acquired from the US Bureau of Land Management and the State of Idaho on an as-needed basis.

Located 13 miles east of Weiser, Almaden is reached by a well-maintained paved county road that terminates within 2 miles of the property and by then by good quality all-season gravel road.

Elevations on the project range from 2,600 feet on the west side of the property to 3,733 feet at the top of Nutmeg Mountain. Hillsides are moderate to steep. Vegetation consists of various rangeland grasses and scattered areas of sagebrush. Average annual precipitation is 13 inches, coming mainly as winter snow (Attebery, 1987). Winters in this part of Idaho are cold while summers are hot and dry. The average temperature in January is 36.6 degrees F, and the average high in July is 92.7 degrees. Evaporation rates normally exceed precipitation rates.

There are no sources of surface water available in the immediate project area. WGM (1997) reported that the three possible sources of surface water were present in the Almaden project are two irrigation reservoirs located 5.5 and 11 miles from the site, and the Weiser River, which has a possible diversion site located approximately 3.5 miles from the property. No wells capable of producing sufficient water for a mining operation are known to exist in the immediate area however no previous operator has attempted to drill a well of sufficient capacity to provide water for a mining operation.

Electrical power for the site would be available from Idaho Power. Previous mercury mining operations at Almaden, which ran intermittently from 1939 to 1972, derived its power from the Idaho Power commercial grid. Given the small size of the former mining operation, the utility lines and right of way corridor it utilized would be insufficient size for a larger scale mining operation. The closest Idaho Power high voltage power

transmission lines are 6 miles to the east of the Almaden site and consist of the 230 kilovolt lines which run from the Brownlee Power Plant in the Hells Canyon Complex to a substation located in Ontario, Oregon.

Freegold is unaware of any immediate environmental concerns or potential liabilities associated with the historical mining of the property. Areas of former mining activity have been left undisturbed by Freegold. Any future development and commercial production would fully assess both the potential environmental and liability concerns if required.

In October 2005 Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) completed a database search of potential environmental hazards in the Weiser, Idaho area (EDR, 2005).The resulting EDR-Site Report was derived from the search of over 4 million government records from more than 600 federal, state and local environmental databases. Because of its past mercury production and current inactive status, the Almaden mine was identified in the CERCLIS-NFRAP (Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System – No Further Remedial Action Planned) database administered by the US Environmental Protection agency. The original CERCLIS database contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the EPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed for addition to or already on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. As of February 1995, CERCLIS sites designated "No Further Remedial Action Planned" (NFRAP) have been removed from CERCLIS. NFRAP sites, such as the Almaden mine area, may be sites where, following an initial investigation, no contamination was found, contamination was removed quickly without the need for the site to be placed on the NPL, or the contamination was not serious enough to require Federal Superfund action or NPL consideration. EPA has removed approximately 25,000 CERCLIS sites from their databases to lift the unintended barriers to the redevelopment of these properties and has archived them as historical records so EPA does not needlessly repeat the investigations in the future. This policy change is part of the EPA’s Brownfields Redevelopment Program to help cities, states, private investors and affected citizens to promote economic redevelopment of otherwise unproductive urban sites.

The Almaden (or Osa Anna) mine on Nutmeg Mountain was originally a mercury mine according to Ross (1936). While other mercury occurrences are known from the region, Almaden appears to have received the most development work (Ferris, 2004). Harry Brown, an owner of the Pittsburgh Mining Co. made the first discovery of cinnabar at Nutmeg Mt. while herding sheep in the summer of 1936. Seventeen claims were staked over the following two years In 1938 the property was leased to Lawrence K. Requa, a mining engineer who then organized the Idaho Almaden Mines Co. Production began on May 17, 1939, and operations were carried on continuously until the mine shut down in December 1942. The mining operation consisted of a 50 ton per day reduction plant consisting of a crusher that reduced ROM ore to 1.5 inches or less before introducing the ore to a rotary kiln where the mercury sulfide was roasted and the mercury vapor condensed to elemental mercury (Attebery, 1987). During this period the mine produced 3,958 flasks of mercury, at a recovered grade of 6.27 pounds per ton (0.31%). The property was returned to the original owners in 1942. Subsequently, small, high-grade cinnabar occurrences were found on the northern part of the crest of Nutmeg Mountain and explored as late as 1953 (Ross, 1936, Ferris, 2004).

Mercury mineralization at Almaden cropped out at the surface and was mined in a broad open cut which eventually reached a length of 270 feet and a width of 135 feet. Maximum depth was 30 feet. Exploration was by shallow shafts and drill holes. Mining went underground to follow irregular zones too deep to mine by open cut methods. Although one shaft went to 165 feet in a fault, most of the workings were at a maximum depth of 30 feet.

In 1954 Rare Metals Corporation of America leased the property and to explore through its subsidiary, El Paso Gas and Oil Company. The mercury mine was shutdown from 1942 until September 20, 1955 when production was resumed with what was reported to be the world’s largest single rotary kiln. In 1957, the mine produced 2,200 flasks of mercury but in 1959 the US government removed the US$225 per 76-pound flask floor price and mercury mines all over the United States began to shut down. The production rate at the

Almaden mine slowly decreased and a temporary shut down occurred in December 1961 when the price of mercury dropped to US$183 per flask. Mining resumed in 1965 when the mercury production reached 100 flasks per month and in February 1966 by-product pozzolan, a silica-iron-aluminum compound that occurs naturally at Almaden and which lends several beneficial characteristics to cement during and after it’s cure period. Mercury Mining continued until March 1972. Although reports from 1938 mentioned gold grades of 0.01 to 0.02 ounces per ton, there are no records of gold production from the Almaden mine.

In the interval from the closing of the mine in World War Two to the late 1990’s two properties emerged. The Davies Property consists of 12 patented mining claims totaling 240 acres (100 hectares) and the Chrestesen Property of approximately 240 acres of fee land.

Following discovery and development of the McLaughlin gold deposit in California in the mid-1970’s, Homestake Mining Company instituted a program to investigate hot springs with mercury occurrences as indicators of systems capable of containing gold.

During the period 1980 through 1995, a total of 651 rotary holes (127,690 feet, both RC and conventional rotary) and 26 core holes (6,180 feet) were completed on the main Almaden project by Homestake, Freegold, Hycroft, Western States, Ican and Amax Gold. In addition, Ican completed 7,545 feet of reverse circulation drilling in 39 holes and 1,171 feet of diamond core drilling in 4 holes in the Stinking Water basin area on the north side of the project and an additional 2,154 feet of reverse circulation drilling in 12 holes in the Cove Creek area on the south side of the project..

Table 2-1: Significant gold assay intercepts in drill holes from the Cove Creek and Stinking Water zones

From 1980 through 1997, metallurgical testing has been carried out by several companies and the data collected by these operators includes 24,033 fire assays, 10,051 cyanide-soluble (HCL assays) assays, 214 bottle roll leach tests, and 188 column leach tests on drill cuttings, crushed drill core and blasted bulk surface material.

The Almaden property is at the edge of the Columbia Plateau. The Columbia Plateau is a geologic province characterized by a thick succession of extrusive basalts which cover northeast Oregon, southeast Washington, and parts of western Idaho. Most of the rocks at the surface in the region are of the Columbia River Basalt group of Miocene age. The Almaden property is on Nutmeg Mountain, which occupies the axis of a northwest trending anticline which forms an erosional window through the Columbia River Basalts. Nutmeg Mountain owes its topographic prominence to the hydrothermal silicification of Miocene sandstones that stratigraphically underlie the basalt.

Almaden is underlain by sediments commonly assigned to the mid Tertiary Payette Formation. In the project area, the rock types include arkosic sandstones with lesser amounts of shale and mudstones. The mudstones are generally not silicified or mineralized and contain only minor amounts of pyrite. The main host for silicification and mineralization is the sandstone.

There are five lithologic units at Almaden: mudstone, sandstone, opalite, hydrothermal (silica) breccia and soil (alluvium).

The gently dipping sandstone units on Nutmeg Mountain are cut by a series of northwest (320^o) and north-northeast (020^o) trending high angle faults that appear to be syn-mineral and a set of near east-west (±20^o of E-W) trending high angle faults that appear to be post-mineral in age (WGM, 1997)). Gold grade thickness contour maps indicate gold mineralization is strongly correlative with northwest structures in the Main zone while more sporadic gold mineralization in the North zone appears to be controlled by north-northeast structures. The strongest grade-thickness intervals (5-6 ft-oz) correspond to zones where the northwest and north northeast structure intersect. Later east-west structure appear to offset the silica cap in the Main zone and bound the southern margin of the North zone, suggesting post-mineral movement on these later structures.

An east-northeast trending fold set is exposed on Nutmeg Mountain and clearly predates the district-scale northwest-trending Paddock Valley structural zone along which the gold mineralization at Almaden forms These folds are best exposed east of the Main and North zones and are truncated on the west by the major northwest-trending fault zone which forms the east side of the Main mineralized zone. The influence of these pre-mineral folds, if any, is uncertain.

In 1995 Freegold acquired an option on the property. In 1996 and 1997 Freegold completed additional metallurgical test-work on pre-existing core samples, and completed 10 large diameter (4”) core holes and the 7 blast pits in the North and Main zones, both of which were utilized for bulk sampling purposes. This work culminated in a preliminary feasibility study that was completed by Watts, Griffis, and McOuat (WGM) in 1997.

Prior to the completion of the 1997 feasibility study, the price of gold began a 5-year decline that rendered the economics of mining at Almaden unattractive to Freegold and to the mining industry as a whole. During the period 1998 through 2004 Freegold sought joint venture assistance to develop the property but was not successful. Total expenditures on the project during this period were limited to federal rental payments and property lease payments.

In December 2004 Freegold completed evaluations of several mining properties in northern Nevada, including hot springs occurrences in the Northern Nevada Rift. As a result of these evaluations, the potential for high-grade feeder zone mineralization was recognized as an unexplored possibility at Almaden and efforts were made to interest potential joint venture partners to pursue this exploration model.

Additional evaluations completed in 2005 and early 2006 resulted in the commencement of a 34,000-foot drill program in July 2006. This program will provide additional data for completion of a new, updated resource estimate on the property by May 2009. Drilling was focused on increasing the resource at depth, along the eastern and western margins of the deposit and in the south, where the deposit remains open

Initial diamond drill results were reported in early October 2006. The first hole, C-37, was located to not only provide representative material for metallurgical testing but also to provide a preliminary test of the deeper gold mineralization beneath the 200 foot deep pit contemplated by the 1997 feasibility study. The hole was drilled to a depth of 540 feet and encountered gold mineralization which averaged 0.021 oz/t (which is equivalent to the current resource grade) over 500 feet. A 100-foot interval (from 35-135”) graded 0.037 oz/t, and a 130 foot interval graded 0.029 oz/t (from 235-365’). Holes C-38 and C-39, drilled at the western edge of the known mineralized area, generated lower grade and lower recovery material for the

metallurgical test program. Hole C-40 returned 0.024 oz/t over the first 210 feet and included 155 feet (from 15-170’) grading 0.030 oz/t. Hole C-41 was drilled in the north-east extension of the Main Zone and averaged 0.014 oz/t to a depth of 175 feet. Assays returned values the same as or slightly higher than the cut off grade used in the previous 43-101 resource calculation (0.011 oz/t) to a depth of 270 feet. The final metallurgical test hole, C-42, was drilled in the middle of the North Zone, where the 1997 WGM pit was designed to a depth of 140-feet. Hole C-42 averaged 0.016 oz/t over its entire 225 foot length with the top 150 feet averaging 0.021 oz/t.

To increase knowledge of both the geology and the gold distribution, a series of drill holes (mostly core) were systematically drilled in parallel, east-west, fences across the known mineralized area. Starting in the Main Zone near the south end of the deposit, 6 core and 2 RC holes were drilled in a fence along grid 37,800N which is 100 feet north of Hole C-37. These holes were designed to expand mineralization at depth and on both the east and west margins of the deposit, to generate additional geological information, including the definition of a major north-south feeder structure recently mapped through the central portion of the Main Zone and decrease hole spacing to improve resource quality. Holes in this fence plus other recently drilled fences to the north intersected the main feeder structure over a known minimum strike length of the 2,000 feet, and the structure has been determined to dip 65-degrees to the west. Assays from the 8 reported holes on line 37,800N indicate that mineralization in the hanging wall of the main feeder structure is significantly higher grade than in the corresponding footwall zone with mineralization encountered near the feeder structure up to 300 feet below previously identified mineralization.

Assay results for holes C47, C46, C45, C43, RC708, C44, C44-A, and RC707 moving from east to west across the southern portion of the Main Zone are presented in Table 2-2, Figure 2-3. Holes designated with a ‘C’ are core holes. The remaining holes are reverse circulation drill holes.

Apart from Hole C44-A, which dips 60 degrees to the east, all of the holes were vertically oriented to test the flat lying mineralization. Significant assay intervals from these 8 holes include

Table 2-2: Significant gold assay intervals from drill fence on Section 37,800 N

The 5 reported holes drilled south of grid 37,800N in the southern portion of the Main Zone to test for possible depth extensions in the hanging wall of the main feeder structure and as infill drilling all successfully encountered resource grades at nearly double the cutoff grade used in the 2006 43-101 report, with good widths of resource grade material extending up to 215 feet below the average depth of previous drilling (Table 2-3). Hole 654, the southern most hole drilled to this depth, encountered resource-grade mineralization to its full vertical depth of 350 feet indicating that mineralization remains open to depth and along strike to the south.

Table 2-3: Significant gold assay intervals of holes drilled in the southern part of the Main Zone

Four holes (C-48, 668, 662, and 660) were drilled to test the eastern and western extent of the gold mineralization within the southern part of the Main Zone. While these holes did not encounter any new zones of mineralization, they did confirm that certain areas previously designated as waste in the 1997 pit design contain areas of mineralization that is expected to be above the internal cut-off of the pit. Some of these significant intersections include: Hole C-48: 0 to 155 feet @ 0.007 oz/ton, hole 668: 115 to 260 feet @ 0.004 oz/ton, hole 662: 45 to 345 feet @ 0.008 oz/ton, including 70 to 85 feet @ 0.036 oz/ton, and hole 660: 190 to 240 feet @ 0.013 oz/ton.

A fence of nine holes (Table 2-4) were drilled across grid line 38,500 N which is 700 feet north of the grid line 37,800N where the first fence was drilled (Figure 2-3). These holes display a profile similar to that along grid line 37,800 N. Holes in grid line 38,500N confirmed the strike and 65-degree westerly dip of the main N-S feeder structure. The drilling also revealed the presence of a second and possibly a third fault splaying off the N-S feeder structure to the northwest, and dipping to the southwest. Similar to results in grid line 37,500N, holes along grid line 38,500N also display higher-grade mineralization in the hangingwall of the identified faults and lower grade mineralization in the footwall rocks, with the grade of mineralization improving as footwall rocks from one fault become the hangingwall rocks for another fault further to the east. From west to east across section 38,500 N, assays are reported below for holes 711, 710, 712, C-49, 709, C-51, C-52, C-53 and C-54. Significant assay intervals from these 9 holes include:

Table 2-4: Significant gold assay intervals from drill fence on Section 38,500 N


Hole Number	From (foot)	To (foot)	Thickness (feet)	Gold Grade (oz/ton)	Comments
711	50	140	90	0.015	Hole lost at 170 feet with no samples below 140 feet.
710	30	225	195	0.030	High-grade mineralization continues to the fault at roughly 230 feet.
712	20	150	130	0.039	Hole lost at 150 feet. Last 5 foot intercept assayed 0.05 oz/ton
including	55	150	95	0.049
C-49	30	235	210	0.028	Twin of hole 712 with excellent correlation
including	60	135	75	0.049
709	95	400	305	0.017	Resource grade material for 200 feet below previous drilling.
including	180	285	105	0.032
C-51	10	450	440	0.016	Nearly resource grade for 250 feet below previous drilling. Crosses main NS fault at roughly 460 feet.
Hole Number	From (foot)	To (foot)	Thickness (feet)	Gold Grade (oz/ton)	Comments
C-50	45	240	200	0.018	Crosses main NS fault at roughly 240 feet.
including	125	185	60	0.034
C-52	70	150	80	0.015	In footwall of NS fault. In-fills and confirms grade.
C-53	30	225	195	0.011	Slightly better than surrounding holes.
C-54	65	115	50	0.008	Essentially limits deposit to the east.

In addition, one vertical hole (C-63, Table 2-5) drilled in the northwest corner of the Main Zone has identified an unexpected fault and breccia zone extending from near surface to 570 feet where the zone is cut off by a fault. The drill hole identified a new splay structure striking northwest which contains a 540-foot interval grading 0.015, the thickest interval of mineralization seen to date From 620 to 630 feet a 10-foot thick zone of 0.025 oz/ton mineralization was also found. The significance of the deeper mineralization in this area is still unknown. Additional drilling is in progress to identify the strike and dip of this fault which will help identify additional targets that may be tested in the future for deeper bonanza-grade gold mineralization in the feeder zones.


Hole Number	From (foot)	To (foot)	Thickness (feet)	Gold Grade (oz/ton)	Comments
C-63	30	570	540	0.015	Longest mineralized interval drilled to date. Crossed a fault at 570 feet
including	30	50	20	0.027
including	115	195	80	0.025
including	490	540	50	0.024	Good grades of mineralization ending 30 feet above fault.
	620	630	10	0.025	Deepest resource-grade mineralization located to date.

Core hole C-66 (azimuth 90^o, dip –75^o), collared in the southern portion of the deposit, continued to identify deeper mineralization within the hanging wall of the main north-south fault in the Main Zone. Significant intercepts from this hole include:

Hole 673, a vertical RC hole drilled 400 feet north and 150 feet east of hole C-66 intersected mineralization in the footwall of one of the main fault splays off the N-S fault. This hole extended mineralization 50 feet deeper than the shallower surrounding holes. Significant intercepts from this hole include:

Drilling continued in an effort to better define and/or extend the known eastern and western boundaries of the deposit and to in-fill wider spaced drilling in areas of lower-grade mineralization within the deposit. These holes have successfully extended the boundaries of the deposit and identified areas containing above cut-off grade mineralization in areas that were previously modeled as waste.

The following table provides significant intercepts from these holes. Except for hole 669 (azimuth 90^o, dip –70^o) all other holes in the following table are vertical.

Table 2.8 – Significant gold assays on the eastern and western boundaries of the deposit.


Hole Number	From (foot)	To (foot)	Thickness (feet)	Gold Grade (oz/ton)	Comments
C-56	0	15	10	0.011	In-fill test of low-grade waste area
C-58	5	145	140	0.017	In-fill comparable to previous drilling in NE Zone
including	5	65	60	0.028
C-59	45	265	220	0.013	Twin of hole 711- identified an additional 40 feet of resource grade material below depth of hole 711
including	135	180	45	0.021
C-60	5	100	95	0.010	Extends the eastern limit of the deposit, and reduces material identified as waste in previous pit designs
C-61	10	160	150	0.011	In-fill of lower grade area between two main fault zones
including	10	50	40	0.022
C-62	175	300	125	0.016	In-fill comparable to previous drilling in the area
Including	175	215	40	0.028
C-64	0	30	30	0.014	Testing the western boundary of the deposit
669	5	25	20	0.043	Testing the western boundary of the deposit
	225	260	35	0.015
671	15	60	45	0.011	Testing the eastern boundary of the deposit
675	40	180	140	0.008	Testing the western boundary of the deposit
677	25	145	120	0.016	In-fill of lower grade area – hole exhibits comparable thickness but higher grades than surrounding holes
	200	240	40	0.010


680	25	180	155	0.011	Testing the eastern boundary of the deposit – mineralization above cut-off should help pull pit floor down on eastern side
683	145	215	70	0.010	Testing the western boundary of the deposit
684	35	260	225	0.012	In-fill in west central part of Main Zone – grade consistent with surround holes - extends depth of mineralization 25 feet
Including	110	145	35	0.018
686	5	160	155	0.012	Testing the eastern boundary of the deposit – grades above cut-off will help lower pit floor
including	25	70	45	0.026
687	65	255	190	0.009	In-fill in lower grade NE zone – grade similar to surrounding holes but hole extends depth by 50 feet
688	65	115	45	0.011	In-fill in NE Zone – same depth as surrounding holes with slightly lower grade
689	70	100	30	0.010	Testing the eastern boundary of the deposit
	120	160	40	0.012

Drilling is continuing to expand both the depth extensions within the central part of the deposit, and the resource grade mineralization in the southern and northwest portions of the Main Zone, as well as further define the limits of gold mineralization on the eastern and western boundaries.

The following table presents the significant drill intercepts from the 10 holes drilled within the central part of the Main Zone. Due to the flat lying nature of the host-rocks and the mineralization, all of these holes were drilled vertically, except for holes 658 and 666 which were both drilled to the east with dips of –75 and -70 degrees respectively and holes C-57 and C-69 which were drilled at a 220 degree azimuth with dips of -55 and -70 degrees respectively.


Hole Number	From (foot)	To (foot)	Thickness (feet)	Gold Grade (oz/ton)	Gold Grade (g/tonne)	Comments
C-67	145	450	305	0.016	0.56	Continues to confirm depth extensions and higher-grade intervals along the main feeder fault at the southern end of the Main Zone
including	145	180	35	0.030	1.02
including	380	420	40	0.030	1.02
C-68	30	470	440	0.022	0.74	Depth extension of resource-grade mineralization 200 feet deeper than the prior shallow drilling in this central part of the Main Zone
including	30	205	175	0.039	1.33
including	50	95	45	0.088	3.02
666	10	170	160	0.024	0.83	Testing the western edge of deeper mineralization with the central part of the Main Zone
including	15	120	105	0.032	1.10
	285	350	65	0.016	0.54
	680	690	10	0.020	0.70	Deepest intersection of resource-grade mineralization within the Main Zone to date
C-86	5	315	310	0.026	0.90	Depth extension and in-fill within the central part of the Main Zone
including	5	195	190	0.034	1.15
including	5	25	20	0.056	1.90
672	30	230	200	0.033	1.14	Higher-grade intervals located within the Main Zone
including	30	145	115	0.050	1.73
658	135	220	85	0.017	0.57
674	15	195	180	0.036	1.22
including	45	150	105	0.049	1.69
C-69	110	425	315	0.023	0.78	Extending thicker, higher-grade intervals of resource grade mineralization further to the NW. Mineralization encountered underneath near surface clay alteration zone above major feeder splay
including	140	305	165	0.030	1.02

Four additional holes were drilled to further test the limits of mineralization at the sides of the deposit within the Main Zone. Hole 694 successfully expanded the eastern edge of the deposit, intersecting 310 feet of 0.013 oz/ton (0.46 g/t) from 20 to 330 feet, including a 45-foot section grading 0.031 oz/ton (1.06 g/t) from 20 to 65 feet. Testing on the western edge of the deposit included:

Hole 657: 110 feet of 0.01 oz/ton (0.35 g/t) from 90 to 205 feet, including 10 feet of 0.035 oz/ton (1.21 g/t) from 195 to 205 feet;

Holes 692 and C-65 were drilled vertically within the northwest extension of the Main Zone and provide true widths of the mineralization that is hosted within the generally flat-lying sediments. Hole 692 is located 120 feet further NNW of previously released hole C-63, which discovered a new fault at a depth of 570 feet, and which intersected resource-grade gold mineralization extending 540 feet in the hanging wall of this fault. Hole 692 appears to be located in the same structural hanging wall and the same brecciated and silicified rocks as those intersected in C-63.

Hole C-65, located in the north part of the Main Zone between two of the central feeder structures initially intersected a 45-foot thick section of clay alteration that appears to be a cap above the hydrothermal structures. Good intervals of resource-grade mineralization were intersected below this cap.

Gold mineralization in Holes 692 and C-65 extend over thicknesses in excess of 250 feet and to depths greater than 300 feet, further extending the size of the deposit which was historically drilled to only 200 feet in this area. Significant gold assays within these two holes include:

Seven of the ten holes drilled in the North Zone were designed to in-fill and confirm the eastern limits of gold mineralization (holes 655, 670, 685, 690, 700, 701 and 703), while the remaining three were designed to in-fill areas within the zone that were historically drilled with wider spacing (holes 681, 702, and C-77). The North Zone contains roughly 13% of the total tonnage reported in the most recent 43-101 resource calculation with average grades 7% lower than that of the Main Zone. In general, all of the shallow in-fill holes conformed to the thicknesses and grades of nearby holes. Significant gold assays from these holes include:

The occurrence of molybdenum in both surface and underground samples has been noted since Freegold resumed active exploration work on the Almaden Project in early 2006. While drill holes in the southern and central portions of the Main Zone had encountered molybdenum in quantities in excess of 0.015% MoS_2,these occurrences generally lacked continuity from hole to hole, with higher grades generally occurring in the proximity of feeder structures. Recent drilling in the North Zone however has encountered molybdenum in quantities as high as 0.32% MoS₂ over 5-feet. Grades in the new holes typically average between 0.03% and 0.05% MoS₂over thicknesses in the 150 to 225 foot range, with the grade of molybdenum declining with gold grades further down the hole.

The significance of this widespread molybdenum encountered both in the North Zone and in recent drilling at the northern end of the Main Zone is uncertain at this time. The molybdenum appears to have been deposited at the same time as the gold mineralization, and it is likely that the greater complexity of block faulting in the northern portions of the deposit has led to a wider dispersion of the molybdenum in this area. Significant molybdenum assays within these northern holes include:

Drilling was also completed within the Stinking Water basin area, located 1,700 feet east of the North Zone. This area was previously identified as prospective by a prior operator through scattered, widely-spaced drilling, which returned some of the highest-grade gold assays within the deposit area. Previous drilling in this basin was done on spacings of up to 500 feet, was never followed up with in-fill drilling, and was never factored in to any previous resource calculations. Freegold’s first hole (SW C44) into the basin was a core hole drilled to a depth of 197 feet. Significant assays from this hole include:

Mineralization in this hole remains open at depth, with the last interval at the bottom of the hole grading 0.025 oz/ton (0.88 g/t). While none of the previous operators assayed for any elements other than gold and silver, it is encouraging to note the surface molybdenum values in this 1,700 foot step-out hole from the North Zone. One interval graded 0.023% MoS₂ over a 119 foot interval (from 35 to 154 feet), including a higher-grade section which graded 0.046% MoS₂ over a 50 foot interval (from 35 to 85 feet).

Five additional shallow RC holes step-out holes (SW 45 to SW 48, and SW 50) were also drilled. As the water table in this basin occurs 20 feet below surface, high water inflows into these holes through the porous surrounding rock sample collection was difficult as the cuttings were washed out of the sample collection containers before they could settle. The porous rocks also caused compressed air to be diverted away from the collection zone at the bit face, washing cuttings into the surrounding rocks and causing surface mud boils around the drill. As a result of these quality control issues, the results from the five holes cannot be relied upon, and further testing of the extents of gold mineralization in this area must await the return of a core rig in the future.

Unless otherwise cited, the following discussion of the mineralization present at Almaden has been derived from WGM (1997).

Gold mineralization at Almaden occurs in two well defined zones, referred to as the Main and North zones. The majority of the mineralization is in the Main zone. Gold mineralization takes the form of a tabular mineralized zone underlain by steeply dipping feeder veins. Mineralization is capped by a silica sinter composed of opalite that appears to pre-date the gold mineralization and apparently acted as an

impermeable capping unit during hydrothermal alteration and mineralization. This is a common feature in hot springs systems (Bonham, 1988). While limited information is available regarding depth extent of gold-silver mineralization in the Main zone, a set of N60°W trending, steeply dipping veins are exposed at the North zone on the ridge face west of the old mercury open pit. These veins may represent feeder structures for North zone mineralization.

The host rock below the silica cap is an arkosic sandstone. The mineralization in the Main zone occurs over a length of approximately 3,600 feet and a width ranging from 460 to 1,700 feet. The vertical thickness ranges from 10 to 490 feet and the average is approximately 150 feet. In the North zone, the mineralization occurs for a length of 1,400 feet, a width of 600 to 800 feet and a thickness of 20 to 170 feet, with an estimated average thickness of 90 feet.

The silver content of the gold averages 25%. A small proportion of the gold occurs as free gold however most of the fine grained gold occurs encapsulated in silica or associated with framboidal pyrite that is in turn silica encapsulated.

The only other sulfide mineral present in any significant quantity is pyrite. It occurs as very fine disseminated often framboidal grains in most of the rock units, but is less common in the opalite and hydrothermal breccia. Typically, the amount of pyrite is less than one percent, although it ranges up to 10 percent locally. Oxidation is nearly complete within the mineralized areas explored by drilling.

In addition to the known resources, Almaden may also have the potential to host deep, high-grade "feeder zone" gold silver mineralization. Following the discovery of the Midas gold deposit in 1994, it became apparent that old mercury/ and or mercury gold -- occurrences in the Northern Nevada Rift have significant but virtually unexplored potential for high-grade gold silver mineralization below the exposed mercury rich hot springs occurrence. A comparison of the Northern Nevada Rift with the volcanic rift of southwestern Idaho where Almaden is located suggests several similarities including age of the host rocks, a strong north-northwest control on mineralization, associated mercury, anomalous arsenic and antimony, depleted base metals content, hot spring alteration and the strata controlled nature of the alteration and mineralization in basinal sediments. Given these similarities we believe a compelling case can be made that the high level silica encapsulated gold-silver mineralization present at Almaden may be the upper part of a deep-seated hot springs system with potential for bonanza grade quartz vein-hosted gold silver mineralization similar to the being mined at the Ken Snyder Mine.

Freegold retained the services of both Dr. Eric Braun, and Dr. Stuart Simmons to further investigate the potential for Almaden to host deep bonanza mineralization. Dr. Braun's report stated that the geological environment at Almaden is appropriate for a deep bonanza feeder" and that "one can infer a structural control oriented N-NW, which may reflect a structural feeder. Mr. Braun provided Freegold with two prioritized drill locations in which to drill a fan of holes to test the deep feeder concept. Mr. Braun's assessment also included a review of the bulk tonnage mineralization, stating "My favourite zone to add significant new resource is to extend the deposit along trend to the south of the South zone. This area has received only minor drill testing, yet the few holes in the zone are encouraging. This area should be mapped, sampled and drilled along the E-W sections like the area further north. The target has about 1,500 feet of strike length and is open further south." Dr. Stuart Simmons, another widely respected epithermal expert also confirmed the potential for Almaden to host bonanza grade at depth. His report indicated that "the depth level of exposure, the footprint of the hydrothermal system, boiling conditions, hydrothermal precious metal transport, and fault-fracture control on fluid movement are all favorable indicators of the potential for deep vein-style epithermal mineralization."

For discussion on the 2007 drilling program, see the Exploration Section of this 20F.

With the exception of drilling efforts by Amax Gold and drilling and blasting of surface pits by Freegold, details relating to sampling methods and sampling protocols utilized by the various companies that have

conducted exploration at Almaden are not available to the authors. Digital drill logs and copies of analytical assay certificates confirm that reverse circulation drill holes were sampled on consistent 5 foot intervals while core hole sampling was less regular and more dependent on rock lithology, mineralization and alteration.

Details relating to sampling verification protocols utilized by Homestake, Freeport, Hycroft, Western States are not available to the author. Much of the hard copy original material that may have contained data relating to this aspect of the work at Almaden was lost over time (K. Walcott, oral comm., 2005).

As part of the resource estimation process conducted by WGM (1997), the first 5-10 assays in the digital database from 47 holes, or about 5% of the holes, were checked against the original assay reports. Although a number of errors were noted, most of these “errors” were differences of 1-2 digits in the 3^rd significant figure of a given analytical result. WGM (1997) ascribed these errors to rounding procedures and concluded that none of the errors noted in their verification process were significant.

In December 2005 the senior author randomly checked 483 samples from the Almaden digital database against scanned copies of analytical certificates retained by Freegold. Verification of reported gold assay grade and drill hole intervals were completed on each sample selected from the database. A total of 472 samples (97.7%) had correct analytical and drill footage data in the digital database currently being used for the Almaden project. Four digital sample results checked retained the correct drill hole number and interval but had an incorrect gold value entered in the digital database. The remaining seven incorrect samples in the database displayed both incorrect drill hole number and interval and an incorrect gold value. Several of the errors can be explained by rounding of certificate data in the database. The only significant error was found in hole 196 where gold values from four non-contiguous sample intervals were omitted in the digital database. These samples returned values ranging from 0.011 to 0.034 opt. Based on the above verification tests, the Almaden digital database is sufficiently accurate for the purposes for which it is being used.

Following completion of the mineral resource estimate that is summarized in this report, Freegold extracted 31 sets of “twin” drill holes from the Almaden drill hole database. These 31 sets of data included 25 drill hole sets where both holes were RC holes and 6 drill hole sets where one hole was RC and the other core. Holes that qualify as twin sets include holes whose spacing is less than 10 meters, a separation distance arbitrarily selected by the authors. As was true of the sample comparison conducted by Bechtel (Ashley, 1986) and WGM (1997) the twin hole comparison completed by the authors indicated that, in general, the higher the gold value the less well correlated were the two corresponding intervals in the twin holes. In some holes grade variability was significant at lower detection limits however this variability may be more related to lower detection limit accuracy and repeatability within the analytical equipment. Grade variability between holes is likely a function of high angle controls for breccia and vein hosted mineralization which cross-cuts earlier flat-lying sandstone unit. This combination of early, lithologic controls and later high angle breccia and vein controls is likely to introduce significant variability between drill holes since a set of twin holes are unlikely to have intercepted the same high and low-angle mineralization.

A Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101 supervised sampling of the drill core and RC samples during the current 2006/2007 programs. The sampling method and approach are described as follows:

During the drilling program, geological personnel visit the core drill at regular intervals, observing and overseeing the performance of the drill crews in the drilling, recovery, handling, boxing and labeling of the drill core. Boxed drill core is delivered to the Freegold’s secure storage facility in Weiser, Idaho at the end of each working shift or when a drill hole is completed. The drill core is then laid out in sequence inside Freegold’s storage and logging facility. Drill core is photographed and visually logged before sampling. Descriptions of lithology, alteration, mineralization, veining structure and beddings and any other pertinent data are entered on drill log forms, using coded entries as appropriate. Graphic drawings of the core are included on the drill log. The sample intervals are marked on the core and recorded in the drill logs with a unique number. Samples are cut in sequence using a Target Model 2051 core saw. Core is split by a trained

sample splitter in accordance instructions from the core logging geologist and is supervised by a Qualified Person as defined b y National Instrument 43-101. Samples are placed in uniquely labeled heavy poly sample bags. Sample blanks, standards and duplicates are inserted into the sample strings at this stage and represent, at a minimum, 10% of the sample string. The samples are then placed in labeled rice bags for shipment to ALS Chemex in Winnemucca, NV. The samples are stored in the secure Freegold storage facility until picked up by ALS Chemex for transport to Winnemucca. Sample preparation is conducted at the Winnemucca laboratory and one split of the pulp is shipped to Reno for gold analysis by fire assay and cyanide solubility. The second pulp split is sent to ALS Chemex’s Vancouver laboratory for multi-element analysis by ICP.

A geologist is present at all times during RC drilling to supervise the drillers in their collection of the RC samples, to insure that sample bags are properly numbered, to log samples and to insure that all drilling and sample collection is completed in accordance with industry standards. RC samples are visually logged, noting lithology, alteration, color and such other characteristics as may be visible. Drill conditions are also recorded in the RC drill log. Sample intervals (5 feet) and the corresponding unique sample number are also recorded. Unique sample numbers for duplicates, blanks and standards are also recorded. RC samples are transported to Freegold’s secure storage facility where duplicates, blanks and standards are inserted in the sample string and then the samples are stored until picked up by ALS Chemex for transportation to it’s Winnemucca laboratory. Handling and analysis by ALS Chemex is similar to that for the drill core described above.

Details relating to sampling preparation methods, analytical techniques and sample security protocols utilized by Homestake, Freeport, Hycroft, and Western States are not available to the authors. Much of the hard copy original material that may have contained data relating to this aspect of the work at Almaden has been lost over time (K. Walcott, oral comm., 2005). Limited data on sample preparation and analytical techniques are preserved in digital files that were scanned and included in the 1997 preliminary feasibility study (WGM, 1997) however, these data relate primarily to composite drill interval samples, selected metallurgical samples and other smaller beneficiation tests rather than the bulk of the drill hole geochemistry. Data relating to sample security measures employed by Ican Minerals are not available to the authors.

Reverse circulation drill samples submitted by Amax Gold were picked up at the Almaden drill sites by representatives of Bondar Clegg Ltd. Preparation and analyses for RC samples was by Bondar Clegg Ltd. No extraordinary sample security program was utilized by Amax (J. Wood, oral comm., 2005). Diamond drill core was transported each day in 2-4 foot lengths to a nearby logging and splitting facility in Weiser, Idaho. Once core logging was completed the core was driven by Amax representatives to McClelland Laboratory's metallurgical facility in Reno, Nevada. Portions of the core were sent to Barringer Lab’s Reno facility where warm cyanide test tube analyses were completed on potentially mineralized intervals.

During the 2006/2007 drill program, all samples were delivered daily by the drill contractor to Freegold’s secure storage and logging facility in Weiser Idaho. Samples were sawed and split in accordance with the procedures outlined in Sampling and Analysis. Samples were then picked up by ALS Chemex’s Winnemucca laboratory and transported in bins to Winnemucca for preparation. Access to the samples are restricted to Freegold’s personnel employed on the project.

The following mineral resource estimate was compiled by J. D. Graham, P. Eng., the junior author of the report using parameters derived from existing data on the Almaden project. The author is a principal in the consulting firm of J. D. Graham & Associates Ltd. which prepared this report under a consulting contract with Freegold.

Mineral Resource Estimation Methodology: The following resource estimate was calculated using version 5.0k of the Surpac Vision suite of computer programs. The author has relied on digital assay records from the WGM (1997) database. These records have been verified as described under Data Verification. The

primary source data was a file containing 6,612 composites (5,494 in the Main Zone and 1,118 in the North Zone). These composites represent drill hole assays averaged into 20-foot vertical intervals, with a common reference elevation. The resulting averaged assays are termed composite assays or composites. The computer generated composites were spot checked by the author using Excel spreadsheet calculations of composite grades for an angle hole and a vertical hole. The junior author conducted a number of block grade interpolation trials to determine composite selection distances and weighting that would yield satisfactory block grade estimates. In this process the audit debug output from the interpolation program was compared to manual plots of composite locations. The checks verified that the computer programs were performing as anticipated.

The resources estimated in this report are contained in a three dimensional model similar in orientation and block size to the WGM (1997) model, consisting of blocks measuring 40 by 40 feet in plan and 20 feet high in the vertical dimension. The previous used terminology that divided the deposit into North and Main mineralized zones was retained.

In the development of the final resource model, grades were first calculated using inverse distance interpolation. Previous resource estimates by WGM utilized a search radius of 300 feet in the horizontal direction while calculations completed by Bechtel and R.E. Gray used 200 feet. The author’s analysis of the variograms developed by WGM (1997) and a series of trial grade calculations resulted in interpolation parameters that differed from those used by WGM. The composite search used in the present study was ellipsoidal, with the major axis of 170 feet, oriented at 337 degrees. It is unclear why WGM did not orient their search along this trend, considering that WGM noted that the mineralized zone was oriented in a northwest direction and that the variograms showed the longest range in this direction. The present search, being less than the 300 foot WGM search and the 200 foot search used by Bechtel and R. E. Gray, has resulted in a more conservative resource estimate than the historical figures.

Block grades were calculated using the square of inverse distance. The northeast southwest component of distance was multiplied by a factor of 1.2 before being squared, to reflect the anisotropic nature of grade distribution noted in the variograms. Original gold assay values were not cut because of the low incidence of higher grade values in the drill database.

Geological Controls: The present resource estimate recognizes the need to apply geological controls to the limits of mineralization. The most comprehensive available source of geology was a set of 6 east west cross-sections showing rock type, alteration and gold content above 0.01 opt. The sections vary in spacing from 400 to 1,100 feet. These cross-sections, supplied by Freegold, are dated November 1993 and bear the name of Amax Gold Inc. These sections were considered adequate for use as geological control sections for the resource estimates.

The Amax cross-sections depict faulting, lithologies and mineralization at >0.01 opt cut off and indicate that gold mineralization often follows certain favorable lithologies. A number of primarily vertical faults are shown. In several areas the 0.01 opt gold mineralization is interpreted as terminating against high angle faults suggesting either post-mineral motion along these faults and/or these faults were present prior to mineralization and acted as impermeable barriers to gold-bearing hydrothermal fluids.

The following procedure was used to insure that the block model conformed to the geological constraints illustrated in the Amax sections. Vertical check sections were drawn through the block model at 200 foot intervals. In the Main Zone, the orientation of the check sections was 067 degrees, which is perpendicular to the orientation of the Main mineralized zone and the major search axis. The North Zone has a north – south trend so the check sections in this zone were oriented east – west. Displayed on the sections were the interpolated blocks lying on section, assays from drill holes within ±50 feet of the section and the Amax 0.01 opt gold outer boundary. Only the Amax outlines within ±200 feet of the section were shown on a particular section. The North zone has a north-south trend so the check sections in this zone were oriented east–west.

Generally there was good correlation between the interpolated blocks and the Amax mineralization outlines. Each check section was examined to detect any interpolated blocks that were not compatible with the Amax outlines. In most cases of discrepancy, particularly in the Main zone, the interpolated grades did not extend as

far from the drill holes as the Amax 0.01 opt gold boundaries. In this case grade blocks were not added to the model. In other areas the block grades extended beyond the Amax 0.01 opt gold boundaries. These blocks are termed “outliers”. The outlier blocks were further examined on drawings showing the interpolated blocks in plan view (a block plan map was prepared for each 20 foot level on which the sections showed outliers). Certain outlier blocks were removed from the model. The decision to remove outliers or not was based on 1) the presence or absence of a drill hole(s) in the area of the outlier blocks; 2) the pattern of drill holes in the area; and 3) the composite value from the drill holes near the outlier. One such area where outliers were not removed was near holes 331, 464, 101, 278 and 276. These holes show consistent drill hole values above 0.01 opt gold in an area Amax did not identify as having values above 0.01 opt gold. It is not known why Amax did not extend their 0.01 opt line into this area.

In applying the geological constraints described above, blocks removed in the Main zone represented approximately 400,000 tons while blocks removed from the North zone totaled approximately 200,000 tons.

Specific Gravity: WGM (1997) calculated densities for 11 lithologic and structural units drawn from 100 samples of drill core within the Almaden deposit. The density determinations ranged from 12 to 13 cubic feet per ton. The outlines of lithologic and structural units used by WGM were not available to the authors. Furthermore, the record of the densities assigned to the individual blocks could be found and there is no record of a weighed average density for the deposit. Because of these limitations, the present tonnage estimates used the lowest of the reported densities, 13 cubic feet per ton, for all resource blocks.

Cutoff: A cut off of 0.011 opt was chosen based on a review of the WGM economics of the deposit. This cut off should be reviewed following preliminary examination of the resource using more current precious metal prices, recovery estimates and operating costs and adjusted if necessary. As a measure of tonnage sensitivity to grade, Table 2-9 reports tons and grades at cutoffs of 0.006, 0.008, 0.010 and 0.012 opt.

Mineral Resource Estimate: The following mineral resource estimate for the Almaden deposit is in compliance with the definitions given in National Instrument 43-101 and the CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves Definitions and Guidelines adopted by CIM Council on August 20, 2000, as amended.

In the Main zone, blocks were included in the indicated mineral resource classification if they lay within a rectangular solid having north and south walls within ±300 feet of an Amax cross-section, measured perpendicular to section, and having east and west walls defined by the ends of the Amax sections. Blocks outside this range were classed as inferred mineral resources. In the North zone the Amax control sections show a higher proportion of thin mineralized beds and correspondingly a lower proportion of thick volumes of continuous mineralization. Because of this less reliable distribution of mineralization the selection distance for indicated mineral resources in the North zone was reduced to ±250 feet of the Amax sections. Blocks outside of this range and/or beyond the end of the Amax sections were classified as inferred mineral resources.

In the Main zone only isolated blocks or groups of blocks assigned a grade by interpolation occur below the 3,100-foot elevation. The paucity of tonnage at lower elevations is due in large part to the limited drilling below this elevation. The Amax control sections also bottom at 3,100 feet elevation. Considering both the lack of drilling and the absence of geological control, mineral resources were not reported below the 3,100 foot elevation.

Based on a cutoff grade of 0.011 opt gold the Almaden deposit contains indicated mineral resources of 22,526,000 tons grading 0.021 opt gold in the Main zone and 2,252,000 tons grading 0.019 opt gold in the North zone (Tables 2-13 and 2-14). Using the same cutoff grade, the Almaden deposit also contains inferred mineral resources of 16,337,000 tons grading 0.018 opt gold in the Main zone and 3,652,000 tons grading 0.018 opt gold in the North zone (Tables 2-14 and 2-15). Total indicated resources for the deposit equal 24,778,000 tons grading 0.021 opt gold. Total inferred resources for the deposit equal 19,989,000 tons grading 0.018 opt gold.

Table 2-14 Indicated mineral resources for the Almaden deposit, 0.011 opt cutoff

An ‘Indicated Mineral Resource’ is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape and physical characteristics can be estimated with a level of confidence sufficient to allow the appropriate application of technical and economic parameters, to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The estimate is based on detailed and reliable exploration and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes that are spaced closely enough for geological and grade continuity to be reasonably assumed.

Cautionary Note to US Investors concerning estimates of Indicated Resources:

This section uses the terms “indicated resources”. We advise US investors while those terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the US Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize them. US investors are cautioned not to assume that any part of all mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves.

Table 2-15: Inferred mineral resources for the Almaden deposit, 0.011 opt cutoff

An ‘Inferred Mineral Resource’ is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity and grade or quality can be estimated on the basis of geological evidence and limited sampling and reasonably assumed, but not verified, geological and grade continuity. The estimate is based on limited information and sampling gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes.

This section uses the terms “inferred resources”. We advise US investors while those terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the US Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize it. “Inferred Resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an Inferred Mineral Resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources may not form the basis of feasibility or prefeasibility studies, except in rare cases. US investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an inferred resource exists, or is economically or legally minable.

Discussion of the Inferred Mineral Resource: The central sections of the Main and North zones and to a lesser extent the Northwest mineralized zones of the Almaden deposit have been drilled on close spacing. In the Main zone 45% of the interpolated blocks have a composite within 50 feet of the block center and 88% of the interpolated blocks have a composite within 100 feet of the block centre. In the North zone 39% of the interpolated blocks have a composite within 50 feet of the block center and 87% of the interpolated blocks have a composite within 100 feet of the block center. Despite the higher drill density in this part of the deposit, the limited geological controls available to guide grade interpolation prevented categorizing mineralization in the Measured category.

There is a gap in the tonnage table between elevations 3540 and 3400 of the North mineralized zone. This gap exists because holes collared on the ridge in the central section of this zone extended no deeper than 3540 elevation. Also, holes located on the western side of this zone were collared at elevations of 3400 and lower.

Material Affect of Non Geoscientific Factors: Non geoscientific factors such as environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-economic, marketing, and political issues can affect the estimate of mineral resources. In the case of a Mineral Resource under the current CIM standards, there must be reasonable prospects for economic extraction. In the author’s opinion, none of the non-geoscientific factors that may impact the Almaden deposit rule out the prospects for economic extraction from the deposit.

Material Affect of Technical Factors: Numerous geoscientific factors have the potential of affecting the economic viability of a given gold deposit such as Almaden. These factors include, but are not limited to reserve drill hole density, blasting characteristics, pit wall stability, stripping ratio, mining dilution rates, electrical consumption related to work index, gold metallurgy and recovery rates, reagent consumption and deposit hydrology. Reliable sensitivity data for such geoscientific factors have not been generated for the Almaden deposit and therefore cannot be discussed here. Table 2-16 shows the effect of changing cutoff grades on total tons and average grade of several cut offs.

Table 2-16: Sensitivity of grade and tonnage to cut-off grades, Almaden Deposit.

As a further check on the reliability of the block model grade estimates completed for this resource estimate, 10 assay intervals from Freegold’s large diameter core holes C27 through C36 were compared against the block models calculated by Surpac Vision software used in the resource estimate (Table 2-17). The three assay splits from each core hole interval were averaged and then compared to the block model assay for the same footage intervals. Block model assays ranged from 4.8% more than the corresponding core interval grade to 43.22% less than the corresponding core interval grade. Block model assay grades averaged about 10% lower than the corresponding interval from the large diameter core samples. If this comparison holds for the remainder of the Almaden resource base it suggests that the current resource estimates for Almaden are conservative.

Table 2-17: Comparison of grades from block model and large diameter core intervals

Additional resource potential in the Almaden area exists at the Stinking Water and Cove Creek prospects to the north and south of the main Almaden resource base. While drilling data are limited, both of these areas deserve further evaluation as they are along trend of the structure(s) which appear to control the mineralization in the main deposit area.

Deep, high-grade “feeder zone” gold – silver mineralization is the other area where significant resource potential exists at Almaden. Following discovery of the Midas gold deposit in 1994, it became apparent that old mercury and/or mercury – gold occurrences in the Northern Nevada Rift have significant but virtually unexplored potential for high grade gold – silver mineralization below the exposed mercury rich hot springs occurrences. Since then, deposit such as Mule Canyon, Buckhorn and Hollister, each thought to be Carlin-type derivatives in the 1980’s, were recognized as hot springs gold – silver – mercury occurrences representing the upper extremes of a typical hot springs hydrothermal system (John and Wallace, 2000; John and others, 2000). Comparison of the Northern Nevada Rift with the volcanic rift of southwestern Idaho where the Almaden deposit is located suggests the two share numerous similarities, including the mid-Miocene age of the host rocks, the strong north-northwest controls on mineralization, the associated mercury and anomalous As and Sb, the depleted base metal contents, the hot springs alteration and the strata-controlled nature of alteration and mineralization in basinal sediments. Given these similarities, a compelling case can be made that high level silica encapsulated gold-silver mineralization at Almaden may be the upper part of a deep-seated hot springs system with potential for bonanza grade quartz vein-hosted gold-silver mineralization similar to that being mined at the Ken Snyder mine.

Following the receipt of final assay results for the current program, the data was complied and forwarded to Mine Development Associates of Reno, Nevada which is in the process of completing an updated 43-101 resource estimate.

Further drilling to test open strike lengths, to continue to test for the extent of molybdenum mineralization and for in-fill purposes will be determined following the completion of the new resource calculation expected in May 2009.

Deep feeder zone mineralization should be explored by core drilling with minimum target depths of 2,000 feet and maximum depths of 3,000 feet. Initial targeting would be directed to the northeast or southwest to test for northwest-trending feeder zones parallel to regional and district-scale structural trends. All core should be HQ diameter or larger to enable sample replicates and metallic screen analyses to be conducted in the event coarse grained gold – silver mineralization is encountered. Total recommended drilling would be 15,000 feet in 5-7 holes. All holes should be logged, photographed, split and analyzed for gold by fire assay plus a multi-element suite, including mercury, by ICP methods using four acid digestion. Additional metallurgical tests, metallic screen analyses and cyanidation tests should be conducted on mineralized intervals in these holes. Total approximate cost would be $900,000, including all labor, drilling, analytical, permitting, reclamation and support costs.

By agreement dated 9 July 2002, the Company has the option to earn a 100% interest in a 20-year lease on certain mineral claims located in the Goodpaster Mining District, Alaska, known as the Rob Property.

As consideration, the Company paid US$29,000 and issued 1,000,000 shares. In addition, the Company is also required to expend a total of US$1,000,000 in exploration expenditures on the property prior to 31 December 2008 (completed). Minimum work in any given year shall not be less than US$10,600 per year.

During the year, the company reached the US$1,000,000 level of cumulative expenditures on the property and issued an additional 500,000 shares of the Company valued at $305,000. In addition, the vendor retains a 1% NSR which the Company may purchase for US$1,000,000.

The Company is also responsible to make cash payments of US$80,000 (paid) for an underlying agreement with the vendor.

Commencing 1 December 2008, annual advance royalty payments must be made depending on the average gold price for the proceeding year as follows:

The vendor shall retain a NSR, which shall vary according to the London gold price for the preceding six-month period as follows: 1% for gold prices less than US$300, 1.5% for gold prices between US$301 and US$350, and 2% for gold prices greater than US$350. The NSR may be purchased for US$500,000 for each percentage point. An undivided 100% interest in the property may be purchased for US$1,500,000.

Shortly after the vendor acquired the Property from the owner (Ronald O. Bailey) the owner passed away intestate. Proceedings to close the estate and establish the rights of the new underlying owner remain in progress. Execution of a revised lease is anticipated during 2009 and is not expected to alter the existing performance terms of the original agreement on the property.

The Rob prospect is located in east-central Alaska approximately 110 miles southeast of Fairbanks and 50 air miles northeast of Delta Junction (Figure 3.1). The Rob project consists of 106 state of Alaska mining claims covering 4,240 acres in the Big Delta quadrangle in Townships 6 and 7 South, Ranges 17 and 18 East, Fairbanks Meridian. The claims are registered as Rob 1 through Rob 106 with Alaska Division of Mining, Land and Water Management as ADL#s 540699 through 540714, 544324 through 544339 and 545266 through 545339. Mineral rights in this part of Alaska are administered by the State of Alaska. Annual rents are $130 per claim for State claims ($13,780 total) and rental payments are due on September 1 of each calendar year and payable before November 30 of each year. Annual work commitment on the properties in the amount of $2.50 per acre per year is required with amounts in excess of these levels bankable up to four years into the future. All claims currently are in good standing. The claims of the Rob project have not been surveyed by a registered land or mineral surveyor and there is no State or federal law or regulation requiring such surveying. A three-year exploration permits for the project was approved by the Alaska Department of Natural Resources in 2007 and currently is in good standing through 2009. Depending on the level of exploration work proposed, additional permits may be required from the Department of Natural Resources and will be applied for on an as-needed basis.

The Company is unaware of any environmental liabilities associated with the Property.

During 2007, the Company entered into a mineral exploration agreement with an option to lease from the Doyon Native Corporation on the Vinasale property in central Alaska. Under the Agreement, the Company must make cash payments of US$320,000 over five years (US$50,000 first year paid, US$60,000 second year paid), make annual scholarship donations of US$10,000,(US$10,000 first and second year paid) and make minimum exploration expenditures totaling US$4,750,000 (US$300,000 first year -completed).

During 2008, the Company requested that Doyon consider deferring the remaining 2008 expenditures to 2009, 2010 and 2011 in exchange for an additional contribution of US $20,000 to the scholarship fund. In 2009, the Company again requested that Doyon give consideration to reducing the 2009 exploration expenditures to $300,000 US. Doyon has granted this consideration. The Company has made the 2009 option payment.

The Company may at its option enter into a one year extension by making an additional cash payment of US$100,000 and incurring an additional US$1,500,000 in exploration expenditures. In the event the property is reduced by 50% or more, the additional exploration expenditures shall be reduced to US$1,000,000.

The Vinasale Project is located is located in the south western Alaska approximately 16 air miles south of McGrath, Alaska (Figure 4-1). The Vinasale Project covers an area of approximately 143,296 acres in Townships T. 29 N., R. 34 & 35 W, T. 30 N., R. 34 & 35 W, T. 31 N., R. 33 & 35 W. Access is by helicopter in summer and winter and/or snowmobile in winter.

The Company acquired certain mineral claims known as the Union Bay Property, in Alaska, USA, by way of staking.

(i) By agreement dated 1 October 2002 and amended 2 April 2003, the Company granted to Pacific North West Capital (“PFN”), a company with certain directors and officers in common at that time, an option to earn a 70% interest in the property. To earn its 50% interest, PFN, purchased a private placement of $165,000 (2002) and made cash payments, issued shares and incurred exploration expenditures as follows:

Following vesting with a 50% interest, PFN had the right to elect within 45 days to increase its interest to 60% by completing a feasibility study within 12 months of having vested. This election was not made. Upon vesting, PFN issued 253,586 shares at market value for $100,000 to the Company.

The Union Bay PGE prospect is located in Southeast Alaska about 35 miles north-northwest of Ketchikan on the northern end of the Cleveland Peninsula (Figure 6-1). The property is bounded on the north and east by Vixen Inlet, on the south by Bear Creek and on the west by Union Bay. The property is located in the Craig C1 1:63,360 quadrangle in Township 70 South, Ranges 86 and 87 East, Copper River Meridian.

The Union Bay project consists of 86 unpatented federal lode and 6 state mining claims covering 1,720 and 240 acres, respectively. The current claims, include: MB1- MB9, UB18-21, UB 24-56, UB 60-65, UB70-74, UB78-83,UB115-116, UB, 118-119, UB121-122, UB124-125, QTUBL 114-116, QTUBL119-121, QTUBL 124-126, QTUBL 129-131, FGUBL 1-3, and QTUBST 1-6 The claims are located in Township 70 South, Ranges 86 and 87 East, Copper River Meridian and are recorded in the Ketchikan Recording District and at the Alaska Division of Lands and the US Bureau of Land. In this part of Alaska, the State of Alaska and the US Forest Service administer mineral rights. The Union Bay project is located within the Tongass National Forest on multiple-use lands open to mineral development. Annual rental payments on Federal mining claims are due on or before each August 31 and total US$125 per claim per year. Annual rentals are paid in lieu of work on Federal ground. For State claims annual rents are US$25 per claim and work on the ground in the amount of US$100 per claim per year is required. All claims in the Union Bay property currently are in good standing through August 31, 2009. A registered land surveyor has not surveyed the claims, and there is no State or federal law or regulation requiring such surveying. There are no known environmental liabilities attached to the property and permits for future work will be acquired from the US Forest Service and the Alaska Department of Natural Resources on an as-needed basis.

By various agreements dated between 6 March and 19 December 2000, the Company acquired a property in the Sudbury region, Ontario known as the PGM A Property. During a prior year, the Company earned a 100% interest in the property by making cash payments of $100,000, issuing 300,000 shares and incurring exploration expenditures of $50,000. The Company is also required to issue a further 100,000 shares to the optionor upon the completion of a bankable feasibility study.

The property is subject to a 3% NSR. The Company has the right to purchase up to 2% of the NSR for $3,000,000. (The first 1% for $1,000,000 and the second 1% for $2,000,000).

By Letter Agreement dated 16 November 2001, the Company granted to PFN, a company with certain directors in common, an option to earn a 70% interest in PGM A for cash payments of $55,000 (received),

issuance of 20,000 PFN shares (received) and exploration expenditures on the property of $55,000 (completed).

PFN has the right to purchase an additional 30% interest in the property by paying to the Company $750,000. The Company and PFN will share the NSR buyout privileges in proportion to their respective interests.

The Property is located in Dana and Janes Townships, of Ontario, which lay approximately 100 road kilometers northeast of the City of Sudbury, Ontario (Figure 7-1). The Dana Lake portion is accessed by traveling northwest and then north along Highway 805 from River Valley, and then by a series of logging roads, skidder trails and/or access trails. The property consists of the following 87 claim units (1,392 hectares): Dana Township: 1246498, Janes Township: 1231107, 1235822, 1235888, 1235889, 1235891, 1235892, 1235894, and 1235896.

During the year ended December 31, 2007 all costs associated with the property have been written off.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated audited financial statements and related notes thereto included herein. The Company’s financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. Reference should be made to Note 12 to the financial statements for a discussion of the material differences from the amounts presented in Canadian GAAP to US GAAP.

The Company is a mineral exploration company with no producing properties and consequently has no current operating income or cash flow.

The Company’s accounting policy is to capitalize all costs relating to the acquisition, exploration and development on an individual property basis until such time as the property is put into production or the property is disposed of either through sale or abandonment. The costs capitalized for mineral properties are reviewed on a property-by-property basis to consider if there is any impairment on the subject property. As

at December 31, 2008, the Company has capitalized cumulatively $28,168,999 on the acquisition and exploration of its mineral property interests.

The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements requires management to use estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, as well as revenues and expenses. The most significant accounting estimates for the Company relate to the carrying value of its mineral property assets and accounting for stock-based compensation. The Company’s accounting policies are set out in full in Note 1 of the annual consolidated financial statements.

The company records its interests in mineral properties at cost. The costs of acquiring mineral properties and related exploration and development expenditures, holding costs to maintain a property and related foreign exchange amounts are deferred and would be amortized against future production following commencement of commercial production or are written-off if the properties are sold, allowed to lapse or abandoned.

Option payments received are treated as a reduction of the carrying value of the related mineral property and deferred costs until the receipts are in excess of costs incurred, at which time they are credited to income. Option payments are at the discretion of the optionee, and accordingly, are recorded on a cash basis.

Management of the company regularly reviews the net carrying value of each mineral property. Where events or changes in circumstances suggest impairment, estimated future cash flows are calculated using estimated future prices, proven and probable reserves, value beyond proven and probable reserves, probability weighted outcomes and operating capital and reclamation costs on an undiscounted basis. If it is determined that the future cash flows are less than the carrying value, a write-down to the estimated fair value is expensed for the period. The company presently has no proven or probable reserves. Where estimates of future net cash flows are not available and where other conditions suggest impairment, management assesses if carrying values can be recovered. If the carrying values exceed estimated recoverable values, then the project is written-down to estimated fair values with the write-down expensed in the period.

Management’s estimates of future mineral prices, recoverable resources, initial and operating capital and reclamation costs are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that may affect the recoverability of mineral property costs. Although management has made its best estimate of these factors, it is possible that changes could occur that could adversely affect management’s estimate of the net cash flows to be generated from its properties.

Another significant estimate relates to accounting for stock-based compensation. Option pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected price volatility. Changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, and therefore, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of the Company’s stock options granted/vested during the year.

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2008 compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007

The year ended December 31, 2008 resulted in a net loss of $5,165,861 which compares with a loss of $4,384,463 for the same period in 2007. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008 were $2,849,449, an increase of $103,074 over the same period in 2007. The loss is mainly attributable to $1,641,021 (2007: $1,388,088) in non-cash stock-based compensation expenses that were charged upon the granting of long-term incentive stock options and performance shares.

During the year, 2,660,000 stock options were granted under a graded vesting schedule. The total fair value of stock options that vested using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model resulted in stock-based compensation expense of $1,810,885 for the year ended December 31, 2008 (2007: $572,112). $1,128,191 of this amount was allocated as stock-based compensation expense and $682,694 has been allocated to mineral properties in proportion to management’s or consultant’s time spent on specific projects. Stock-based compensation for performance shares issued was $512,832 for the year ended December 31, 2008 (2007: $815,976).

Professional fees of $236,798 (2007: $87,936) were recorded as additional legal expenses were incurred during the year to assist in the preparation of various equipment and bridge loan documents. Interest costs of $721,494 were incurred mainly due to the interest on the US$5,791,000 loan which included a 4% loan fee of $165,720 and $188,290 non cash expense associated with the value of the loan warrants.

Amortization for office equipment of $19,161 for the year ended December 31, 2008 (2007: $12,874) was recorded. Mining equipment amortization of $453,968 (2007: $161,088) was attributed to $2,344,943 in mining equipment that was obtained for the Golden Summit project in Alaska.

A foreign exchange loss of $1,173,327 was recorded on US$5,791,000 in loans that are payable in US funds. This resulted as the US dollar became stronger relative to the Canadian dollar.

Shareholder relations and promotional activities undertaken by the Company, which included attendance at various trade shows, advertising, news releases, distribution fees and marketing materials, cost $233,051 for the year ended December 31, 2008, a decrease of $15,381 over the same period in 2007. In April, a part-time consultant was hired to assist with investor relations.

Travel costs of $92,375 (2007: $144,981) decreased as fewer trips were taken for promotional purposes and as a general cost cutting measure. Consulting fees of $37,591 (2007: $167,383) were also reduced as the Company curtailed the services of outside consultants in order to conserve cash.

Transfer and filing fees of $118,248 (2007: $45,751) increased due to the additional expenses incurred during the year to assist in the preparation of various equipment and bridge loan documents.

All other general and administrative costs were relatively the same when compared to the previous year.

A capital loss of $2,915 was realized on the sale of investments in 2008 as compared to a capital gain of $151,687 over the same period in 2007. Interest income of $35,292 was also earned in 2008, which was less than the $107,376 earned in 2007 as the Company had fewer funds on deposit and earned lower rates during the current year.

During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company incurred mineral property deferred exploration costs of $9,304,985. Of the deferred exploration costs, $528,330 was incurred to review and update previous engineering and resource work and $124,365 was incurred for assays on the Almaden project in Idaho. $6,522,559 was incurred on the Golden Summit project in Alaska of which $1,770,428 was for drilling and assays and $3,483,347 was for bulk sampling/plant commissioning and infrastructure. Gold proceeds of $306,143 were taken as a credit against Golden Summit expenditures. $1,566,629 was incurred in mapping, geophysics and drilling on the Rob project in Alaska, and $408,925 was incurred on the Vinasale Alaska project.

Mineral property acquisition costs of $629,449 were also incurred which included $98,359 for the Almaden Idaho project, $72,100 for the Vinasale Alaska project, $52,500 in cash and $305,000 in shares for the Rob Alaska project and $101,490 for the Golden Summit Alaska project.

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007 compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006

The year ended December 31, 2007 resulted in a net loss of $4,384,463 which compares with a loss of $1,772,633 for the same period in 2006. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2007 were $2,746,375, an increase of $1,235,710 over the same period in 2006. Most of the increase is attributable to $1,388,088 in stock-based compensation expenses that were charged upon the granting of long-term incentive stock options and performance shares. The total fair value of stock options that vested using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model resulted in stock-based compensation expense of $572,112 for the period ended December 31, 2007 compared to $83,835 for the previous year. The stock-based compensation expense has been allocated by expense category on the income statement. Stock-based compensation for performance shares was $815,976 as compared to $284,083 for the previous year. Amortization of $173,962 was recorded as compared to $13,003 for the previous year. Mining equipment amortization of $161,088 was attributed to $1,050,963 in new mining equipment that was obtained for the Golden Summit project in Alaska. All other general and administrative costs were relatively the same when compared to the previous year. Capital gains of $151,687 were realized on the sale of investments in 2007 as compared to $85,884 over the same period in 2006. Interest income of $107,376 was also earned in 2007 as compared to $40,998 in the previous year as the Company had more funds on deposit.

During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company incurred mineral property deferred exploration costs of $8,169,365. Of the deferred exploration costs, $1,256,236 was incurred to review and update previous engineering and resource work and $1,604,340 was incurred for drilling on the Almaden project in Idaho. $3,996,400 was incurred on the Golden Summit project in Alaska of which $1,902,641 was for bulk sampling/plant commissioning and infrastructure. $567,864 was spent on the Rob project in Alaska which included $295,470 in drilling. Mineral property acquisition costs of $385,277 were also incurred which included $52,159 for the Almaden Idaho project, $28,325 for the Rob Alaska project, $66,435 for the Vinasale Alaska project and $195,358 for the Golden Summit Alaska project. During the third quarter, the Company terminated the Grew Creek, Yukon property agreement and the associated costs of $1,365,285 were written off. Management also decided to write-off its $247,199 investment in the PGM A Property in Sudbury, Ontario that is currently majority held by a third party.

Shareholder relations and promotional activities undertaken by the Company, which included attendance at various trade shows, advertising, property site visits, news releases, distribution fees and marketing materials, cost $248,432 for the period ended December 31, 2007, an increase of $48,367 over the same period in 2006.

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2008 compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007

At December 31, 2008, the Company’s working capital, defined as current assets less current liabilities, was a deficit of $10,259,582 compared to a surplus of $4,124,121 at December 31, 2007. Short term loans that have a maturity date of July 15, 2009 comprises $4,953,503 and the convertible loan comprises $2,200,996 of this deficit. The Company has trade payables of $3,138,724 and is trying to settle the majority of this amount by way of shares for debt conversion. During 2008, 554,500 options were exercised for proceeds of $262,260 and 628,786 performance shares issued for $6,288.

During the year, a US $1,791,000 convertible loan was obtained secured against bulk sampling related equipment at Golden Summit and against private property that was purchased in January 2008 adjacent to the Golden Summit property. The loan has a term of 2 years, with the lenders having the right to accelerate the maturity of the facility any time after the first anniversary of the closing, should the Company raise additional debt, equity or receive asset sales aggregating $3 million or more. The lenders also have the right

during the term to convert the outstanding principal, in whole or in part, into the Company’s common shares at a conversion price of US $1.23/share. The interest rate for the loan is 4% per annum, payable quarterly. No fees were paid in relation to the closing or arrangement of this facility.

Subsequent to year end, the Company breached certain covenants under the convertible loan agreement, and the loan is currently in a default situation. The lenders have not provided the Company with any default notice, and the Company is in negotiations with the lenders for certain waivers and interest payment extensions to allow the Company to maintain the original May 30, 2010 maturity date.

On July 31, 2008 the Company secured a US $2 million short term loan financing and on August 22, 2008, the Company received from a second lender an additional US $2 million short term loan, bringing total short term loan proceeds to US $4 million.

The first US $2 million bridge loan facility had a maturity date of January 15, 2009. Terms for this facility include an annual interest rate of 12.5% payable monthly, a cash closing fee, and 350,000 warrants to the lenders to purchase common stock of the Company for a two year period at a price of $0.66 per share. The lenders have the right to put the warrants back to the Company one year after closing of the bridge for value of $100,000. The second US$2 million loan had the identical terms, except the strike price of the warrants is at $0.55 per share. The loans can be prepaid at any time, and all proceeds generated from subsequent financings must be used to repay the loans.

On January 14, 2009, the bridge lenders agreed to extend the maturity of their loans to February, 10, 2009. As consideration of this extension, the exercise price of the 350,000 warrants each lender received at the time the bridge loans were advanced was reduced from $0.66 and $0.55 respectively to $0.30, and the Company issued each lender an additional 250,000 common shares.

On February 23, 2009, the bridge lenders agreed to further extend the maturity date of their loans to July 15, 2009. As consideration of these extensions, the interest rate on the two loans was increased from 12.5% to 15.0%, and the lenders received extension fees consisting of 720,000 common shares of the Company and 1,000,000 warrants to purchase common stock of the Company for a two year period. Of the 1,000,000 warrants, the senior lender was issued 500,000 warrants at a price of C $0.17/share after providing the Company with an additional US$200,000 that was added to the principal of the extended short term loan, while the subordinated lender was issued 500,000 warrants at a price of C $0.25/share. A cash fee equal to 3% of loan principal is also payable upon the earlier of the receipt of new financing or March 31, 2009.

The Company is in a difficult financial condition, and over the past three months the Company has only been able to meet critical payments to keep its portfolio of exploration properties in good standing, and to meet other minimum sustaining requirements through the recent advances made by its senior bridge lender. Freegold continues to pursue a number of alternatives in order to satisfy its various debt obligations and to provide additional working capital to the Company. These include ongoing discussions with parties that have expressed an interest in the possible purchase of individual projects and in the possibility of business combinations. Vendors who are owed project-related payables have been working with the Company as it seeks alternative financing, and discussions have commenced with vendors representing the majority of the outstanding accounts payable debt regarding an exchange of debt for common shares of the Company. While management is hopeful that one, or a combination of these alternatives, will address the Company’s current financial situation and provide additional working capital, there can be no assurances that the Company will be successful in its efforts (see “Risks and Uncertainties”).

As the Company is a mineral exploration company with no research and development, the information required by this section is inapplicable.

As the Company is a mineral exploration company with no producing properties, the information required by this section is inapplicable.

The Company is committed under operating leases, for its office premises in Vancouver and Idaho.

This Form 20-F includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as "expects" or "does not expect", "is expected", "anticipates" or "does not anticipate", "plans", "estimates" or "intends", or stating that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will" be taken, occur or be achieved) are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward looking statements". Such statements are included, among other places in this Registration Statement, in the sections entitled "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," "Description of Business" and "Description of Property"; and, in particular the section entitled the "Almaden Property" as they involve the assessment, based upon certain assumption, concerning future events and conditions that the resources described can be profitably produced. Forward-looking statements are based on expectations, estimates and projections at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. These include, but are not limited to, the risks of mining industry (for example, operational risks of exploring for, developing and producing crude oil and natural gas, risks and uncertainties involving geology of mineral deposits, the uncertainty of reserve estimates and estimates relating to production volumes, cost and expense projections, potential cost overruns and health, safety and environmental risks), risks relating to the Company's properties (for example, lack of operating history and transportation), fluctuations in mineral prices and exchange rates and uncertainties resulting from potential delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures (collectively "Cautionary Statements"). Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct.

The following table states the name, province or state, and country of residence of each of the directors and executive officers of the Company, the positions and offices presently held by them and the period or periods of time during which each has served as a director of the Company.

Additional details including principal occupation for the past five years of the above directors or executive officers are as follows:

Mr. Medd is an independent businessman. He retired as President of the Redpath Group of Companies (1999-2004), world leaders in underground mine development, and is a current director of the group. He has served on the board of the Ontario Mining Association.

Mr. Knight is a partner with the law firm of Macleod Dixon LLP, who brings with him over 25 years experience in securities and mining law. David's expertise is in the areas of public and private financing,

mergers and acquisitions, corporate governance and regulatory compliance, and he represents both issuers and investment dealers on a regular basis. David's representation of numerous clients on property acquisitions and development, and his experience in closing large mining transactions will be of great assistance in helping Freegold continue to grow through in-house project developments and on-going acquisitions. David has been recognized as a recommended lawyer in the area of mining law by the LEXPERT Legal Directory, and has been designated as a "Best Lawyer in Canada" for 2007 and 2009 in the area of Natural Resources Law. From August 2003 to December 2005 Mr. Knight was counsel with Miller Thomson LLP and prior to August 2003 was a partner with Macleod Dixon LLP.

Mr. Marleau, a graduate of the University of Ottawa is currently President & CEO of Palos Capital Corp. (1998-present).

Mr. Manz holds a B.A.Sc. in geological engineering from the University of Toronto, and an MBA from York University and has been involved in the financing and operation of several North American gold producers over the past 19 years. From 2003 to 2005 Mr. Manz was a financial consultant in the mining and power generation sectors. From 2000 to 2003 he served as the Director of Finance of Energy Development Group, LLC in Connecticut.

Mr. Gross holds a BS degree in Geology from the University of Wisconsin, Madison and an MS degree in Economic Geology from the University of Arizona. He has been involved in exploration, mine operations, financing and corporate management at several North American gold and silver producers. From 2001 to 2004 Mr. Gross managed the construction and operational startup of an industrial minerals operation in Ontario, Canada. During 2005, as VP Exploration, Mr. Gross managed gold exploration in Mexico for Nayarit Gold Inc. Beginning in 2006 Mr. Gross has served as VP Exploration for Freegold Ventures Limited, managing Freegold’s projects in the US and Canada. He currently sits on the board of a Canadian junior exploration company and is a registered Professional Geologist in the state of Idaho.

Ms. Walcott has worked in various capacities in the mining and mineral exploration industry for the past 20 years. Ms. Walcott has held administrative and field positions including General Manager of Orex Laboratories, a diamond sample processing facility and Mines Land Manager for Pacific North West Capital and CanAlaska Uranium Limited, both Vancouver-based mineral exploration companies with extensive land positions in Canada and the United States. In addition she was actively involved in the geophysical contracting industry where she assisted in remote-site field geophysical surveys for major and junior mining firms. Ms. Walcott has served as the Company’s VP Business Development since March 2005 where she is responsible for identifying and acquiring new business opportunities in the mining sector.

Mr. Steblin obtained a Bachelor of Commerce degree in 1983 from the University of British Columbia (UBC), and in 1985 he became a Certified General Accountant. Mr. Steblin has over 20 years of financial experience in the junior mining/exploration sector. Mr. Steblin was previously the Chief Financial Officer of CanAlaska Uranium Ltd., El Nino Ventures Inc. and Pacific North West Capital Corp. Mr. Steblin is currently the Chief Financial Officer of Alberta Star Development Corp. and Dynamic Gold Corp.

Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) means each individual who served as chief executive officer of your Company or acted in a similar capacity during the most recently completed financial year.

Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) means each individual who served as chief financial officer of your Company or acted in a similar capacity during the most recently completed financial year.

Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”) means a right, granted by a company or any of its subsidiaries as compensation for employment services or office to receive cash or an issue or transfer of securities based wholly or in part on changes in the trading price of publicly traded securities.

Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) means a plan providing compensation intended to motive performance over a period greater than one financial year. LTIPs do not include option or SAR plans or plans for compensation through shares or units that are subject to restrictions on resale.

(a) each CEO; (b) each CFO; (c) each of the Company’s three most highly compensated executive officers, other than the CEO, who were serving as executive officers at the end of the most recently completed financial year and whose total salary and bonus exceeds $150,000; and (d) any additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided under (c) except that the individual was not serving as an officer of the Company at the end of the most recently completed financial year.

The following table sets forth all compensation for all years indicated in respect of the individuals who were, NEOs as of December 31, 2008

The following table sets out the options granted to Directors and Executive Officers during the Company's most recently completed financial year.

The closing price of the Company’s common shares on December 31, 2008 was $0.21

During the financial year ended December 31, 2008 options were granted to NEOs as per the above table.

Aggregated Option\SAR Exercises During the Most Recently Completed Financial Year and Financial Year End Option\SAR Values

The table below sets out, on an aggregate basis, the number of common shares of the Company acquired through stock options by the NEOs under the Company’s Stock Option Plan during the financial year ended December 31, 2008 and the number and value of unexercised options as at December 31, 2008.

Aggregate Value Realized is the difference between the market price of the Company’s common shares on the date of exercise and the option exercise price, multiplied by the number of common shares acquired.

Value of Unexercised Options is equal to the difference between the closing price of the common shares of the Company on the TSX on December 31, 2008 of $0.21 and the exercise price of options outstanding, multiplied by the number of shares purchasable under such options.

Option/SARs cancelled/expired to NEO’s During the Most Recently Completed Financial Year

During the financial year ended December 31, 2008 no common shares of the Company to NEOs were cancelled/expired.

During the financial year ended December 31, 2008 no options to NEOs were repriced.

Other than the grant of stock options pursuant to the Company’s share option plan, the Company made no LTIP awards during the most recently completed financial year.

Termination of Employment, Change in Responsibilities and Employment Contracts

The NEOs do not have agreements with respect to their employment with the Company. Refer to Compensation of Directors below disclosing the payments made by the Company.

The Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for, among other things, evaluating the performance of the Company’s executive officers, determining or making recommendations to the Board with respect to the compensation of the Company’s executive officers, making recommendations to the Board with respect to director compensation, incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans, making recommendations to the Board with respect to the compensation policy for the employees of the Company or its subsidiaries and ensuring that the Company is in compliance with all legal requirements with respect to compensation disclosure. In performing its duties, the committee has the authority to engage such advisors, including executive compensation consultants, as it considers necessary.

The Company’s executive compensation program is administered by the Board of Directors in consultation with the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee and is designed to provide incentives for the enhancement of shareholder value. The overall objectives are to attract and retain qualified executives critical to the success of the Company, to provide fair and competitive compensation, to align the interest of management with those of shareholders and to reward corporate and individual performance. The compensation package has been structured so as to link shareholder return, measured by the change in the share price, with executive compensation through the use of stock options as the primary element of variable compensation. The Company does not currently offer long-term incentive plans or pension plans to its executive officers.

The relative emphasis of the Company on cash compensation, options, SARs securities purchase programs, shares or units that are subject to restrictions on resale and other incentive plans is variable. The Company’s cash compensation to Named Executive Officers tends to remain more or less constant, while any options, SARs security purchase programs, are left to the discretion of the Board of Directors and therefore may fluctuate from year to year.

The Company takes into consideration the issuance of options, SARs, shares and units, the grants made in previous years, and the number that remain outstanding along with the amount of options remaining issuable under the Company’s stock option plans.

The Company bases the compensation for the Company’s executive officers on the years of service with the Company, responsibilities of each officer and their duties in that position. The Company also bases compensation on the performance of each officer. The Company believes that stock options can create a strong incentive to the performance of each officer and is intended to recognize extra contributions and achievements towards the goals of the Company.

The Company’s Board of Directors, when determining cash compensation to the Chairman, President, and CEO takes into consideration the extensive experience in the mining industry, responsibilities and duties as Chairman, President, and CEO, as well as personal risks and contributions to the Company’s success. The Chairman, President, and CEO receive a base cash compensation that the Company feels is in line with that paid by similar companies in North America; however no formal survey was completed by the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee or the Board of Directors.

During fiscal year ended 2008 the Company maintained three incentive and stock option compensation plans, the 2004 Plan, 2005 Plan and the Performance Share Plan, all of which have been previously approved by the shareholders of the Company and by the TSX. The following table sets forth information with respect to the securities outstanding under these incentive and stock option compensation plans as at December 31, 2008.

None of the current or former directors, executive officers or employees of the Company or persons who were directors, executive officers or employees of the Company at any time during the Company’s last completed financial year, none of the proposed nominees for election of directors of the Company and none of the associates or affiliates of such persons are or have been indebted to the Company (or its subsidiaries) at any time since the beginning of the last completed financial year ending December 31, 2008. Furthermore, none of such persons were indebted to a third party during such period where their indebtedness was the subject of a guarantee, support agreement, letter of credit or other similar arrangement or understanding provided by the Company or its subsidiaries.

None of the directors or executive officers of the Company or other informed person, nor any proposed nominee for election as a Director of the Company, nor any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, shares carrying more than 10% of the voting rights attached to all outstanding shares of the Company, nor any associate or affiliate of the foregoing persons has any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction since the commencement of the Company's last completed financial year or in any proposed transaction which, in either case, has or will materially affect the Company, except as disclosed herein.

The Company’s auditors for the year-ended December 31, 2005, Staley Okada & Partners, merged with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PWC”) in 2006, and PWC was appointed by the board as the Company’s auditors for the year ending December 31, 2006. The Director’s subsequently elected to change auditors to James Stafford, Inc., Chartered Accountants (“Stafford”). PWC resigned as auditors effective January 25, 2008 and the directors appointed Stafford in their place.

No management functions of the Company or any subsidiary are to any substantial degree performed by a person other than the directors or executive officers of the Company or subsidiary, except as disclosed herein.

In June 2005, National Policy 58-201 Corporate Governance Guidelines (the “Governance Guidelines”) and National Instrument 58-101 Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices (the “Governance Disclosure Rule”) were adopted by the securities regulatory authorities in Canada. The Governance Guidelines deal with matters such as the constitution and independence of corporate boards, their functions, the effectiveness and education of board members and other items dealing with sound corporate governance practices. The Governance Disclosure Rule requires that, if management of an issuer solicits proxies from its security holders for the purpose of electing directors, specified disclosure of its corporate governance practices must be included in its management information circular.

The Board recognizes the importance of corporate governance to the effective management of the Company. The Company’s approach to significant issues of corporate governance is designed with a view to ensuring that the business and affairs of the Company are effectively managed so as to enhance shareholder value. The Board fulfills its mandate directly and through its committees at regularly scheduled meetings or as required. Frequency of meetings may be increased and the nature of the agenda items may be changed depending upon the state of the Company’s affairs and in light of opportunities or risks which the Company faces. The directors are kept informed of the Company’s operations at these meetings as well as through reports and discussions with management.

The Company’s corporate governance practices have been and continue to be in compliance with applicable Canadian requirements. The Company will continue to monitor developments in this area with a view to further revising its governance policies and practices as appropriate.

The following is a description of the Company’s corporate governance practices.

Three of the five members of the Board on December 31, 2008 were independent within the meaning of the Governance Disclosure Rule. The independent members were Morris Medd, Hubert Marleau and Robert Jackson. Robert Jackson resigned from the Board on January 13, 2009, and to date, no replacement director has been proposed.

Steve Manz is a non-independent director because of his position as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and David Knight is a non-independent director because the firm of which he is a partner receives fees from the Company for legal services.

To facilitate the Board functioning independently of management, the following structures and processes are in place:

• there are no members of management on the Board, other than the President and Chief Executive Officer;

• time is set aside at each meeting of the Board for the directors to hold discussions without management present; and

• the Company’s standing committees, being the Audit Committee and the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee, are made up entirely of independent directors.

In addition to their positions on the Board, the following Directors also serve as Directors of the following reporting issuers or reporting issuer equivalents:

The Board holds a minimum of four meetings each year, either in person or by consent resolution as well as additional meetings as required. Since the beginning of the Company’s most recently completed financial year, the independent Directors have not held a meeting at which non-independent Directors were not in attendance.

The Chairman of the Board, Morris Medd is an independent director. The primary roles of the Chairman are to chair all meetings of the Board and shareholder meetings, and to manage the affairs of the Board, including ensuring the Board is organized properly, functions effectively and meets its obligations and responsibilities. The Chairman’s responsibilities include, among other things, reviewing and assessing director attendance and performance at meetings of the Board, ensuring effective relations and communications among Board members, leading the Board in ensuring implementation of management succession and development plans, providing assistance on major strategic and policy issues and acting as liaison with all committees of the Board.

In the year ended December 31, 2008, the Board held 3 meetings and passed resolutions by way of consent resolutions on 10 different occasions. All of the Directors executed all of the consent resolutions, and all of the directors attended the meetings.

The Board has a written mandate, which ensures that the Board discharges its responsibilities in an effective manner and that the Board understands the boundaries between Board and management responsibilities.

The mandate of the Board, as prescribed by applicable corporate law, is to manage or supervise the management of the business and affairs of the Company and to act with a view to the best interests of the Company. In doing so, the Board oversees the management of the Company’s affairs directly and through its committees. In fulfilling its mandate, the Board, among other matters, is responsible for reviewing and approving the Company’s overall business strategies and its annual business plan, reviewing and approving the annual corporate budget and forecast, reviewing and approving significant capital investments outside the approved budget; reviewing major strategic initiatives to ensure the Company’s proposed actions accord with shareholder objectives; reviewing succession planning; assessing management’s performance against approved business plans and industry standards; reviewing and approving the reports and other disclosure issued to shareholders; ensuring the effective operation of the Board; and safeguarding shareholders’ equity interests through the optimum utilization of the Company’s capital resources.

The Board is in the process of developing a written position description for the Chairman of the Board. The Board is also in the process of developing a written position description for the CEO.

Board turnover is relatively rare and, accordingly, the Company has not adopted a formalized process of orientation for new Board members. Orientation of new directors is conducted on an ad hoc basis.

Directors are kept informed as to matters impacting, or which may impact, the Company’s operations through reports and presentations at the Board meetings. Directors are also provided the opportunity to meet with senior management and other employees, advisors and Directors, who can answer any questions that may arise.

The Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, a copy of which is attached hereto as “Exhibit 8”. ITEM 19

Board turnover is relatively rare and accordingly the Board does not have a nominating committee or a formal procedure with respect to the nomination of directors. The nominees are generally the result of recruitment efforts by the Board members, including both formal and informal discussions among Board members.

Committees of the Board are an integral part of the Company’s governance structure. There are two standing committees (the “Committees”), established to devote the necessary expertise and resources to particular areas, and to enhance the quality of discussion at Board meetings. The Committees facilitate effective Board decision-making by providing recommendations to the Board on matters within their respective responsibilities. The Board believes that the Committees assist in the effective functioning of the Board and that the composition of the Committees should ensure that the views of unrelated and independent directors are effectively represented.

A summary of the responsibilities and activities and the membership of each of the Committees are set out below:

At December 31, 2008, the Audit Committee was comprised of Hubert Marleau, Chairman of the Audit Committee, Morris Medd and Robert Jackson, all of who are financially literate in accordance with national securities legislation. Mr. Hubert Marleau, B.Sc., is currently President & CEO of Palos Capital Corp., and has been a director or executive officer of several public companies for over 25 years. Mr. Morris Medd is the retired President of the Redpath Group of Companies, world leaders in underground mine development, and a current director of the group. He has also served on the board of the Ontario Mining Association. Mr. Robert Jackson holds a mining engineering degree, an MBA and a Chartered Financial Analyst® designation and has been involved in the investment banking and mining industries for over 30 years. On January 31, 2009, Mr. Jackson resigned from the Company’s Board of Directors and from the Audit Committee. In the case of a resignation of a member of the Audit Committee, the Company’s Audit Committee charter allows for a continuation of the Committee so long as a quorum of the original committee members exists.

The Audit Committee reviews and recommends to the Board for approval the annual financial statements and the annual report of the Company. The quarterly financial statements of the Company are reviewed by the Audit Committee and the Board. In addition, the Audit Committee is charged with the responsibility of monitoring the integrity of the Company’s internal controls and management information systems. For the purposes of performing these duties, the members of the Audit Committee have the right, at all times, to inspect all of the books and financial records of the Company and to discuss with management and the auditors of the Company any accounts, records and matters relating to the financial statements of the Company.

The Audit Committee must pre-approve any engagement of the external auditors for any non-audit services to the Company in accordance with applicable law and policies and procedures to be approved by the Board. The engagement of non-audit services will be considered by the Company's Board of Directors on a case by case basis.

In the following table, “audit fees” are fees billed by the Company's external auditors for services provided in auditing the Company's annual financial statements for the subject year. “Audit-related fees” are fees not included in audit fees that are billed by the auditors for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company's financial statements. “Tax fees” are fees

billed by the auditors for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. “All other fees” are fees billed by the auditors for products and services not included in the foregoing categories.

The fees paid by the Company to its auditors for each of the last two fiscal years, by category, are as follows:

During the fiscal year ended 2008, the Board appointed a Compensation Committee composed of three directors: Morris Medd, Hubert Marleau and Robert Jackson. On February 8, 2008, the Board of Directors agreed to combine the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committees into one new committee, and agreed upon a new Charter. As of December 31, 2008, the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee was composed of three independent directors: Robert Jackson, Morris Medd and Hubert Marleau. Mr. Jackson resigned from the Company’s Board of Directors and from the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee on January 13, 2009. In the case of a resignation of a member of the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee, the Company’s charter allows for a continuation of the Committee so long as a quorum of the original committee members exists.

Based upon the Company’s size, its current state of development and the number of individuals on the Board, the Board considers a formal process for assessing the effectiveness and contribution of the Board as a whole, its committees or individual directors to be unnecessary at this time. In light of the fact that the Board and its committees meet on numerous occasions during each year, each director has regular opportunity to assess the Board as a whole, its committees and other directors in relation to the Board's and such director's assessment of the competencies and skills that the Board and its committees should possess. The Board plans to continue to evaluate its own effectiveness and the effectiveness of its committees and individual directors in such manner.

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, the Company had four full-time employees and utilized various services of 6 consultants.

The following table sets forth the share ownership of the persons listed in subsection 6.A and the employees/consultants of the Company. The table below includes the details of all options outstanding. As of February 28, 2009 the Company also had 4,450,000 warrants outstanding. Of these warrants outstanding, no warrants are held by the persons listed in subsection 6.A or the employees/consultants of the Company as of February 28^th, 2009.


	Grant Date	Expiry Date	Exercise Price	Number of Options

Employees and Consultants
	Nov 5, 2004	Nov 5, 2009	$0.50	35,000
	July 17, 2006	July 17, 2011	$0.50	80,000
	Jan 25, 2007	Jan 25, 2010	$0.75	400,000
	June 4, 2007	June 4, 2010	$1.20	40,000
	July 13, 2007	July 13, 2012	$1.50	25,000
	October 16^th, 2007	October 16^th, 2012	$0.40	40,000
	February 21, 2008	February 21, 2013	$1.42	240,000
	April 10^th, 2008	April 10^th, 2010	$1.42	150,000
				1,010,000
	Nov 5, 2004	Nov 5, 2009	$0.50	275,000
	Sept 30, 2005	Sept 30, 2010	$0.20	500,000
	Mar 13, 2006	Mar 13, 2011	$0.35	290,000
	Sept 21, 2006	Sept 21, 2011	$0.50	100,000
	November 1, 2007	November 1, 2012	$2.10	150,000
	February 21, 2008	February 21, 2013	$1.42	1,820,000
				3,135,000
				4,145,000

The Company has three existing incentive and stock compensation plans which have previously been approved by the shareholders: the 2004 Plan, the 2005 Plan and the Performance Share Plan (all as defined below). These plans, which are detailed below, are maintained separate and apart from each other.

The 2004 Plan was adopted to advance the interests of the Company and its shareholders by affording key personnel, upon whose judgment, initiative and effects the Company rely for the successful conduct of the Company’s business, an opportunity for investment in the Company and the incentive advantages inherent in the share ownership in the Company. The 2004 Plan authorizes the Board to grant options to key personnel selected by the Board, upon considering criteria such as employment position or other relationship with the Company, duties and responsibilities, ability, productivity, length of service or association, morale, interest in the Company, recommendations by supervisors and other matters.

The 2004 Plan is administered by the Board in accordance with the terms of the 2004 Plan. Pursuant to the 2004 Plan, the Board may grant options to key personnel upon such terms and conditions as the Board may determine in accordance with the terms of the 2004 Plan. The Board will determine the option price (which must comply with TSX policies) and the term of the options, which may be up to 10 years in length. Vesting provisions may be included at the discretion of the Board. The total number of options granted to insiders may not exceed 10% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company in any 12 month period and no insider may be granted options exceeding 5% of the

issued and outstanding shares of the Company in any 12 month period. Pursuant to the 2004 Plan, the maximum number of shares reserved for any one individual may not exceed 5% of the issued and outstanding share capital of the Company at the date of grant. If an optionee’s relationship with the Company is terminated for cause, then such person’s options will terminate on the same day that the relationship ceases. If an optionee’s relationship with the Company is terminated for any reason other than cause or death, then such person’s options will terminate on the same day that the relationship ceases unless the Board specifically allows an additional 30 day exercise period. Upon death of an optionee, such optionee’s options may be exercised by the estate of the optionee for one year from the date of death or such longer period as the Board may determine at the time of grant of the options.

The 2004 Plan may be amended by the Board as it may deem proper and in the best interests of the Company, subject to prior approval of the TSX, provided that no such amendment shall impair any option previously granted under the 2004 Plan.

The 2005 Plan provides that the aggregate number of shares of the Company that may be issued under the 2005 Plan and all other stock option or equity compensation plans as may be in existence from time to time shall not exceed 10% of the issued and outstanding capital of the Company, as such may be from time-to-time.

Information as to shares issued and issuable under the 2005 Plan based on the number of common shares currently outstanding is set forth below:

The purpose of the 2005 Plan is to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions with the Company, to provide incentives and awards to eligible persons under the plan, and to promote the success of the Company’s business. Incentive benefits that may be granted under the 2005 Plan include: stock options (tax qualified and non-tax qualified); stock awards, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, performance shares/units; grant or sale of compensation related restricted shares or deferred shares, cash awards or other incentives that may be determined by the Board in future.

The 2005 Plan is administered by the Board in accordance with the terms of the 2005 Plan.

The 2005 Plan provides that the maximum aggregate number of shares of the Company which may be awarded under the 2005 Plan and all other stock option or equity compensation plans as may be in existence from time to time will be 10% of the issued and outstanding capital of the Company, as

such may be from time-to-time. The 2005 Plan took effect March 1, 2005 and will terminate on March 1, 2015.

Incentives under the 2005 Plan may be granted only to such directors, officers, employees, consultants, advisors or other eligible participants as determined by the Board (collectively, the “Participants”). No individual may receive incentive grants exceeding 5% of issued capital of the Company, unless specifically authorized by the Board and permitted by applicable laws and exchange policies.

The 2005 Plan may be amended by the Board at any time, without shareholder approval subject to the following amendments requiring shareholder approval, as required by law or exchange policies: an increase in the fixed percentage of shares subject to the 2005 Plan and any change in the definition of Participant (i.e., persons that may receive options or awards under the 2005 Plan).

The Board may make amendments such as repricing and extending non insider options.

If required by Exchange policy to which the Company is subject, repricing or extension of incentive agreements to insiders shall require shareholder approval.

The Board may grant options to Participants to purchase common shares of the Company upon such terms and conditions as the Board may determine. The option price will be at fair market value, as determined by the Board in accordance with applicable laws and exchange policies. Unless otherwise specified, the term of each option will be five years from the date of grant with any vesting provisions being set at the discretion of the Board. In most circumstances, an option will be exercisable for a period of three months after an employee ceases to be an employee, where such termination of employment is voluntary, (only with respect to options that are vested on such date of termination of employment). The options will terminate on the date an employee’s employment by the Company is terminated, if such termination is for cause. Where employment has been terminated due to disability or death, the options will be exercisable for six months from the date of termination of employment or death with respect only to options that are vested on the date of termination of employment or death, as the case may be.

Any grant of option may provide for payment to the optionee of dividend equivalents or accretions thereon in cash or shares on a current, deferred or contingent basis or the Board may provide that any dividend equivalent may be credited against the option price. Any grant of an option may provide that payment of the option price may be made in the form of restricted shares or other shares that are not subject to risk of forfeiture or restrictions on transfer in the manner determined by the Board. Any grant may allow for deferred payment of the option price through a sale and remittance procedure whereby the Participant will sell the common shares through a Company-designated brokerage firm, which firm then will forward directly to the Company from the proceeds of sale of the shares, the aggregate option price payable for the purchased shares.

Subject to applicable laws and exchange policies, the Board may, in its discretion, assist any Participant in the exercise of awards under the 2005 Plan by authorizing the Company to provide a loan to the Participant (not to exceed the exercise price plus tax liability incurred in connection therewith), permitting the Participant to pay the exercise price in installments, authorizing the Company to guarantee a loan obtained by the Participant from a third party, or granting a cash bonus to the Participant to enable the Participant to pay tax obligations arising from an award. Any such loans may be forgiven by the Company at the discretion of the Board.

Restricted shares will be sold or transferred by the Company to a Participant at a price which may be below fair market value or for no payment at all, but are subject to restriction on their sale or other transfer by the Participant and such shares will be escrowed until such time as the restrictions are

removed. The number of restricted shares that may be transferred or sold by the Company, the sale price, and the restrictions set on such shares will all be determined by the Board at the time of grant.

Deferred shares are an award of the right to receive shares at the end of a specified deferral period, upon fulfillment during the deferral period of pre-set performance conditions, all of which terms and conditions will be determined by the Board at the time of grant or sale of the deferral shares.

Performance shares or units may be issued to a Participant upon the achievement of specified objectives set by the Board upon terms and conditions set by the Board. As of February 28, 2009, no performance shares are currently allotted under the 2005 Plan.

In 2003 and 2004, the shareholders approved the issuance of an aggregate of 2,187,482 nominal value performance shares (872,897 in 2003 and 1,314,585 in 2004). These performance shares are separate from any performance shares that may be issued under the 2005 Plan. As of February 28, 2009 all 2,187,482 of these shares have been allotted and 1,769,692 have been issued. At the time of shareholder approval in 2003, the 872,897 shares represented 5% of the Company’s then issued and outstanding shares. At the time of shareholder approval in 2004, the 1,314,585 shares represented 5% of the Company’s then issued and outstanding shares. At February 28, 2009 the 2,187,482 performance shares represent 3.35% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares.

These performance shares have been issued at the discretion of the Board to such arm’s length parties as the Board considered desirable to attract to the Company particular expertise, management experience, operations experience, financial capacity, industry profile and other such characteristics in the discretion of the Board. Vesting provisions have been imposed at the discretion of the Board in its sole discretion at the date of issuance. The total number of performance shares granted to any one individual may not exceed 5% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares at the date of issuance.

As of February 28, 2009, 2,187,482 performance shares have been allotted as follows:

400,000 performance shares were allotted on March 5, 2005 of which 300,000 shares have been issued 50,000 shares vested on September 5, 2008 and 50,000 shares vested on March 5, 2009. These performance shares represent 0.61% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares as at February 28, 2009.

1,000,000 performance shares were allotted on October 3, 2005, of which 836,362 shares have been issued. 81,818 shares vested on July 1, 2008 and 81,820 shares vested on August 1, 2008. These performance shares represent 1.53% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares as at February 28, 2009.

400,000 performance shares were allotted on March 13, 2006, of which 333,330 have been issued. 33,333 shares vested on December 13, 2008 with the remaining 33,337 shares vested on March 13, 2009. These performance shares represent 0.61% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares as at the February 28, 2009.

387,482 performance shares were allotted on January 11, 2007 of which 300,000 shares have been issued and the remaining shares have been cancelled. These performance shares represent 0.59% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares as at February 28, 2009.

The following table sets out the options granted to directors, executive officers and others during the Company's most recently completed financial year.

The following table summarizes the issued and outstanding options as at December 31, 2008.


Number Outstanding 31 December 2007	Granted	Exercised	Cancelled	Expired	Number Outstanding 31 December 2008	Exercise Price Per Share	Expiry Date
820,000	-	(524,500)	-	(295,500)	-	$0.48	10 September 2008
310,000	-	-	-	-	310,000	$0.40/$0.50	5 November 2009
500,000	-	-	-	-	500,000	$0.20	30 September 2010
320,000	-	(30,000)	-	-	290,000	$0.35	13 March 2011
80,000	-		-	-	80,000	$0.50	17 July 2011
100,000	-	-	-	-	100,000	$0.50	21 September 2011
350,000	-	-	-	-	350,000	$0.50	11 January 2012
400,000	-	-	-	-	400,000	$0.75	25 January 2010
40,000	-	-	-	-	40,000	$1.20	4 June 2010
25,000	-	-	-	-	25,000	$1.50	13 July 2012
40,000	-	-	-	-	40,000	$1.71	16 October 2012
150,000	-	-	-	-	150,000	$2.10	1 November 2012
-	100,000	-	-	-	100,000	$1.50	8 February 2013
-	2,410,000	-	(125,000)	-	2,285,000	$1.42	21 February 2013
-	150,000	-	-	-	150,000	$1.42	10 April 2010
3,135,000	2,660,000	(554,500)	(125,000)	(295,500)	4,820,000

During the year ended December 31, 2008 there were 4,820,000 options outstanding pursuant to the Company’s 2004 and 2005 plans.

As of December 31, 2008 there were 1,958,341 outstanding options issued under the Company’s 2004 Plan.

As of December 31, 2008 there were 2,861,659 outstanding options issued under the Company’s 2005 Plan

The following table sets out the options granted to directors, executive officers and others during the Company’s most recently completed financial year.

As of February 28, 2009, there were an aggregate of 4,145,000 stock options outstanding. Subsequent to year end no options were granted to directors, executive officers or consultants.

The following table sets out the financial value of options exercised during the Company’s most recently completed financial year by directors, executive officers and others.

125,000 options to a director were cancelled during the Company’s most recently completed financial year.

The following table sets forth the share ownership of those persons holding greater than 5% of the Company’s shares held by such persons as at February 28, 2009

The information as to the shares beneficially owned by CDS and Cede is not within the knowledge of the Company and has been extracted from the registrar of shareholders maintained by the registrar and transfer agent for the Company’s shares.

There were no material related party transactions in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, or proposed material transactions between the Company or any of its subsidiaries, except as previously disclosed in the audited year-ended December 31, 2008 consolidated financial statements.

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this section.

This Annual Report contains the consolidated financial statements for the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, which contain an Audit Report dated March 30, 2009.

No significant change has occurred since the date of the annual financial statements included in this Annual Statement.

The annual high and low market prices for the shares of the Company on the Toronto Stock Exchange for each of the last five full financial years are as follows:

The high and low market prices for the shares of the Company on the Toronto Stock Exchange for each of the two most recently completed financial year for each quarter are as follows:

The high and low market prices for the shares of the Company on the Toronto Stock Exchange for the six most recently completed months are as follows:


December 31	High (Cdn $)	Low (Cdn $)	Volume

September 2008	0.58	0.37	910,400
October 2008	0.41	0.17	1,858,600
November 2008	0.21	0.11	2,408,500
December 2008	0.21	0.11	2,423,100
January 2009	0.33	0.20	2,549,100
February 2009	0.34	0.16	2,094,800

On December 31, 2008 the closing price of the shares of the Company on the TSX Exchange was $0.21

The Company has not, since the date of its incorporation, declared or paid any dividends on its shares and does not currently intend to pay dividends. Earnings will be retained to finance further exploration and development.

The annual high and low market prices for the shares of the Company on the OTC Bulletin Board for each of the last five full financial years are as follows:

*The shares of the Company have been listed on the OTC Bulletin Board under trading symbol “ITFMF” since July 24, 2002 and under trading symbol “FGOVF” since September 4, 2002.

The high and low market prices for the shares of the Company on the OTC Bulletin Board for each of the two most recently completed financial year for each quarter are as follows:

The high and low market prices for the shares of the Company on the OTC Bulletin Board for the six most recently completed months are as follows:

On December 31, 2008 the closing price of the shares of the Company on the OTC Bulletin Board was US $0.16 per share.

The following table indicates the approximate number of record holders of shares at February 28, 2009, the number of record holders of shares with United States addresses and the portion and percentage of shares so held in the United States. On February 28, 2009, 65,446,593 shares were allotted and outstanding which are fully paid.

A substantial number of shares are held by depositaries, brokerage firms and financial institutions in "street names".

The computation of the number and percentage of shares held in the United States is based upon the number of shares held by record holders with United States addresses. United States residents may beneficially own shares held of record by non-United States residents.

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this section.

The Company’s common shares were traded on the TSX Venture Exchange starting March 11, 1987 under the trade symbol “ITF”. Since May 19, 1998, the Company’s common shares have traded on the TSX Exchange under trade symbol “ITF”. The Company has also been listed on the OTCBB since July 24, 2002, first under the trade symbol “ITFMF”, and since September 4, 2002 under the trade symbol “FGOVF”. The Company’s common shares are also quoted in Germany on the Frankfurt, Berlin, Stuttgart and Munich stock exchanges under the trade symbol FR4.

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Exchange Act and as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this section.

As of February 28, 2009, the Company has 65,446,593 shares without par value issued, allotted and outstanding which are fully paid.

The Company’s Articles of Association and Memorandum are registered with the British Columbia Registrar of Companies under corporation number 262963. A copy of these Articles of Association and Memorandum were filed as an exhibit with the Company’s initial registration statement on Form 20-F.

In March 2004, the Company Act (British Columbia) (the “BCCA”) was replaced by the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) (the “BCA”). All companies currently incorporated under the BCCA must complete a transition application to the BCA by March 29, 2006. The directors of the Company have already filed a transition application with the Registrar of Companies and hence the Company now subsists under the BCA.

Pursuant to the BCA the Company is permitted to have an unlimited number of shares as its authorized capital. The alteration of the capital of the Company required approval by a special resolution of the shareholders, being a resolution passed by a majority of not less than three-quarters of the votes cast by the

shareholders who, being entitled to do so, voted in person or by proxy at the general meeting of the company. The company’s shareholders passed such a resolution at the April 26, 2005 meeting.

Under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) (“BCA”), every pre-existing company remained subject to certain “Pre-existing Company Provisions” contained in the Company Act (British Columbia) (“BCCA”) unless such provisions are removed with the approval of the shareholders by way of special resolution.

In order to take advantage of the flexibility offered by the BCA, the board of directors of the Company proposed to remove the Pre-existing Company Provisions in connection with the adoption by the Company of a new form of Articles that incorporates provisions permitted under the BCA. The removal of the Pre-existing Company Provisions required the affirmative vote of not less than three-quarters of the votes cast at the Meeting by shareholders of the Company, present in person or by proxy. The Company’s shareholders passed such a resolution at the April 26, 2005 meeting.

During the year ended December 31, 2008 there were no material contracts entered into by the Company other than contracts entered into during the ordinary course of business.

There is no law or governmental decree or regulation in Canada that restricts the export or import of capital, or that affects the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to a non-resident holder of shares, other than withholding tax requirements. See "Item E. "Taxation".

There is no limitation imposed by Canadian law or by the constituent documents of the Company on the right of a non-resident to hold or vote shares, other than are provided in the Investment Canada Act (Canada). The following summarizes the principal features of the Investment Canada Act (Canada).

The Investment Canada Act (Canada) requires certain "non-Canadian" individuals, governments, corporations or other entities who wish to acquire a "Canadian business" (as defined in the Investment Canada Act), or establish a "new Canadian business" (as defined in the Investment Canada Act) to file either a notification or an application for review with a governmental agency known as "Investment Canada". The Investment Canada Act requires that certain acquisitions of control by a Canadian business by a "non-Canadian" must be reviewed and approved by the Minister responsible for the Investment Canada Act on the basis that the Minister is satisfied that the acquisition is "likely to be of net benefit to Canada", having regard to criteria set forth in the Investment Canada Act. Only acquisitions of control are reviewable under the Investment Canada Act; however, the Investment Canada Act provides detailed rules for the determination of whether control has been acquired and, pursuant to those rules, the acquisition of one-third or more of the voting shares of a corporation may, in some circumstances, be considered to constitute an acquisition of control. Certain reviewable acquisitions of control may not be implemented before being approved by the Minister; if the Minister does not ultimately approve a reviewable acquisition which has been completed, the acquired Canadian business be divested. Failure to comply with the review provisions of the Investment Canada Act could result in, among other things, an injunction or a court order directing disposition of assets or shares.

The following is a summary of certain material U.S. federal income tax consequences relevant to a U.S. Holder (as defined below) arising from and relating to the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of our common shares.

This summary is for general information purposes only and does not purport to be a complete analysis or listing of all potential U.S. federal income tax consequences that may apply to a U.S. Holder as a result of the

acquisition, ownership, and disposition of our common shares. In addition, this summary does not take into account the individual facts and circumstances of any particular U.S. Holder that may affect the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of our common shares. Accordingly, this summary is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, legal or U.S. federal income tax advice with respect to any U.S. Holder. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, U.S. state and local, and foreign tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of our common shares.

Notice Pursuant To IRS Circular 230: Anything contained in this summary concerning any U.S. federal tax issue is not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used by a U.S. Holder, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties under the Internal Revenue Code. This summary was written to support the promotion or marketing of the transactions or matters addressed by this Form 20-F. Each U.S. Holder should seek U.S. federal tax advice, based on such U.S. Holder’s particular circumstances, from an independent tax advisor.

This summary is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), Treasury Regulations (whether final, temporary, or proposed), published rulings of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), published administrative positions of the IRS, the Convention Between Canada and the United States of America with Respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital, signed September 26, 1980, as amended (the “Canada-U.S. Tax Convention”), and U.S. court decisions that are applicable and, in each case, as in effect and available, as of the date of this Form 20-F. Any of the authorities on which this summary is based could be changed in a material and adverse manner at any time, and any such change could be applied on a retroactive basis. This summary does not discuss the potential effects, whether adverse or beneficial, of any proposed legislation that, if enacted, could be applied on a retroactive basis.

For purposes of this summary, a “U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of our common shares that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is (a) an individual who is a citizen or resident of the U.S., (b) a corporation, or any other entity classified as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, that is created or organized in or under the laws of the U.S. or any state in the U.S., including the District of Columbia, (c) an estate if the income of such estate is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of the source of such income, or (d) a trust if (i) such trust has validly elected to be treated as a U.S. person for U.S. federal income tax purposes or (ii) a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of such trust and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of such trust.

For purposes of this summary, a “non-U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of our common shares other than a U.S. Holder. This summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of our common shares to non-U.S. Holders. Accordingly, a non-U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, U.S. state and local, and foreign tax consequences (including the potential application of and operation of any tax treaties) of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of our common shares.

This summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of our common shares to U.S. Holders that are subject to special provisions under the Code, including the following U.S. Holders: (a) U.S. Holders that are tax-exempt organizations, qualified retirement plans, individual retirement accounts, or other tax-deferred accounts; (b) U.S. Holders that are financial institutions, insurance companies, real estate investment trusts, or regulated investment companies;

(c) U.S. Holders that are dealers in securities or currencies or U.S. Holders that are traders in securities that elect to apply a mark-to-market accounting method; (d) U.S. Holders that have a “functional currency” other than the U.S. dollar; (e) U.S. Holders that own our common shares as part of a straddle, hedging transaction, conversion transaction, constructive sale, or other arrangement involving more than one position; (f) U.S. Holders that acquired our common shares in connection with the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation for services; (g) U.S. Holders that hold our common shares other than as a capital asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code; (h) U.S. expatriates or former long-term residents of the U.S.; or (i) U.S. Holders that own, directly, indirectly, or by attribution, 10% or more, by voting power or value, of the outstanding shares of the Company. U.S. Holders that are subject to special provisions under the Code, including U.S. Holders described immediately above, should consult their own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, U.S. state and local, and foreign tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of our common shares.

If an entity that is classified as a partnership (or “pass-through” entity) for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds our common shares, the U.S. federal income tax consequences to such partnership (or “pass-through” entity) and the partners of such partnership (or owners of such “pass-through” entity) generally will depend on the activities of the partnership (or “pass-through” entity) and the status of such partners (or owners). Partners of entities that are classified as partnerships (or owners of “pass-through” entities) for U.S. federal income tax purposes should consult their own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of our common shares.

This summary does not address the U.S. state and local, U.S. federal alternative minimum tax; U.S. federal estate and gift, or foreign tax consequences to U.S. Holders of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of our common shares. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the U.S. state and local, U.S. federal alternative minimum tax, U.S. federal estate and gift, and foreign tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of our common shares.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Acquisition, Ownership, and Disposition of Our Common Shares

A U.S. Holder that receives a distribution, including a constructive distribution, with respect to our common shares will be required to include the amount of such distribution in gross income as a dividend (without reduction for any foreign income tax withheld from such distribution) to the extent of the current or accumulated “earnings and profits” of the Company. To the extent that a distribution exceeds the current and accumulated “earnings and profits” of the Company, such distribution will be treated (a) first, as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of a U.S. Holder’s tax basis in our common shares and, (b) thereafter, as gain from the sale or exchange of such common shares. However, the Company does not intend to maintain the calculations of earnings and profits in accordance with U.S. federal income tax principles, and each U.S. Holder should therefore assume that any distribution by the Company with respect to our common shares will constitute ordinary dividend income. (See more detailed discussion at “Disposition of Our Common Shares” below). Dividends paid on our common shares generally will not be eligible for the “dividends received deduction.”

For taxable years beginning before January 1, 2011, a dividend paid by the Company generally will be taxed at the preferential tax rates applicable to long-term capital gains if (a) the Company is a “qualified foreign corporation” (as defined below), (b) the U.S. Holder receiving such dividend is an individual, estate, or trust, and (c) certain holding period requirements are met.

The Company generally will be a “qualified foreign corporation” under Section 1(h)(11) of the Code (a “QFC”) if (a) the Company is incorporated in a possession of the U.S., (b) the Company is eligible for the benefits of the Canada-U.S. Tax Convention, or (c) our common shares are readily tradable on an established securities market in the U.S. However, even if the Company satisfies one or more of such requirements, the

Company will not be treated as a QFC if the Company is a “passive foreign investment company” (or “PFIC”, as defined below) for the taxable year during which the Company pays a dividend or for the preceding taxable year.

As discussed below, the Company believes that it qualified as a PFIC for the taxable year ended December 31, 2008, and based on current business plans and financial projections, the Company expects that it will be a PFIC for the taxable year ending December 31, 2009. (See more detailed discussion at “Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules” below). The determination of whether the Company will be a PFIC for a taxable year depends, in part, on the application of complex U.S. federal income tax rules, which are subject to differing interpretations. In addition, whether the Company will be a PFIC for its current taxable year depends on the assets and income of the Company over the course of each such taxable year and, as a result, cannot be predicted with certainty as of the date of this Form 20-F. Consequently, there can be no assurance regarding the Company’s PFIC status for any taxable year during which U.S. Holders hold our common shares, and there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge the determination made by the Company concerning its PFIC status.

If the Company is not a PFIC, but a U.S. Holder otherwise fails to qualify for the preferential tax rate applicable to dividends discussed above, a dividend paid by the Company to a U.S. Holder, including a U.S. Holder that is an individual, estate, or trust, generally will be taxed at ordinary income tax rates (and not at the preferential tax rates applicable to long-term capital gains). The dividend rules are complex, and each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the dividend rules.

A U.S. Holder will recognize gain or loss on the sale or other taxable disposition of our common shares in an amount equal to the difference, if any, between (a) the amount of cash plus the fair market value of any property received and (b) such U.S. Holder’s tax basis in our common shares sold or otherwise disposed of. Subject to the PFIC rules discussed below, any such gain or loss generally will be capital gain or loss, which will be long-term capital gain or loss if our common shares are held for more than one year. Gain or loss recognized by a U.S. Holder on the sale or other taxable disposition of our common shares generally will be treated as “U.S. source” for purposes of applying the U.S. foreign tax credit rules, unless such gains are resourced as “foreign source” under an applicable income tax treaty, and an election is filed under the Code. (See more detailed discussion at “Foreign Tax Credit” below).

Preferential tax rates apply to long-term capital gains of a U.S. Holder that is an individual, estate, or trust. There are currently no preferential tax rates for long-term capital gains of a U.S. Holder that is a corporation. Deductions for capital losses are subject to significant limitations under the Code.

The amount of any distribution paid in foreign currency to a U.S. Holder in connection with the ownership of our common shares, or on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of our common shares, generally will be equal to the U.S. dollar value of such foreign currency based on the exchange rate applicable on the date of receipt (regardless of whether such foreign currency is converted into U.S. dollars at that time). A U.S. Holder that receives foreign currency and converts such foreign currency into U.S. dollars at a conversion rate other than the rate in effect on the date of receipt may have a foreign currency exchange gain or loss, which generally would be treated as U.S. source ordinary income or loss.

Taxable dividends with respect to common shares that are paid in foreign currency will be included in the gross income of a U.S. Holder as translated into U.S. dollars calculated by reference to the exchange rate prevailing on the date of actual or constructive receipt of the dividend, regardless of whether the foreign currency are converted into U.S. dollars at that time. If the foreign currency received is not converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, a U.S. Holder will have a basis in the foreign currency equal to its U.S. dollar value on the date of receipt. Any U.S. Holder who receives payment in foreign currency and engages in a subsequent conversion or other disposition of the foreign currency may have a foreign currency exchange gain or loss that would be treated as ordinary income or loss, and generally will be U.S. source

income or loss for foreign tax credit purposes. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own U.S. tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of receiving, owning, and disposing of foreign currency.

A U.S. Holder who pays (whether directly or through withholding) foreign income tax with respect to dividends paid on our common shares generally will be entitled, at the election of such U.S. Holder, to receive either a deduction or a credit for such foreign income tax paid. Generally, a credit will reduce a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability on a dollar-for-dollar basis, whereas a deduction will reduce a U.S. Holder’s income subject to U.S. federal income tax. This election is made on a year-by-year basis and applies to all foreign taxes paid (whether directly or through withholding) by a U.S. Holder during a year.

Complex limitations apply to the foreign tax credit, including the general limitation that the credit cannot exceed the proportionate share of a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability that such U.S. Holder’s “foreign source” taxable income bears to such U.S. Holder’s worldwide taxable income. In applying this limitation, a U.S. Holder’s various items of income and deduction must be classified, under complex rules, as either “foreign source” or “U.S. source.” In addition, this limitation is calculated separately with respect to specific categories of income. Dividends paid by the Company generally will constitute “foreign source” income and generally will be categorized as “passive income.” The foreign tax credit rules are complex, and each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the foreign tax credit rules.

Under U.S. federal income tax law and regulations, certain categories of U.S. Holders must file information returns with respect to their investment in, or involvement in, a foreign corporation. Penalties for failure to file certain of these information returns are substantial. U.S. Holders of our common shares should consult with their own tax advisors regarding the requirements of filing information returns, and if applicable, any “mark-to-market election” or “QEF election” (each as defined below).

Payments made within the U.S., or by a U.S. payor or U.S. middleman, of dividends on, and proceeds arising from certain sales or other taxable dispositions of, our common shares generally will be subject to information reporting and backup withholding tax, at the rate of 28%, if a U.S. Holder (a) fails to furnish such U.S. Holder’s correct U.S. taxpayer identification number (generally on Form W-9), (b) furnishes an incorrect U.S. taxpayer identification number, (c) is notified by the IRS that such U.S. Holder has previously failed to properly report items subject to backup withholding tax, or (d) fails to certify, under penalty of perjury, that such U.S. Holder has furnished its correct U.S. taxpayer identification number and that the IRS has not notified such U.S. Holder that it is subject to backup withholding tax. However, U.S. Holders that are corporations generally are excluded from these information reporting and backup withholding tax rules. Any amounts withheld under the U.S. backup withholding tax rules will be allowed as a credit against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, or will be refunded, if such U.S. Holder furnishes required information to the IRS. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the information reporting and backup withholding tax rules.

If the Company is a PFIC at any time during a U.S. Holder’s holding period, the preceding sections of this summary may not describe the U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. Holders of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of our common shares.

The Company generally will be considered a “PFIC” under Section 1297 of the Code if, for a taxable year, (a) 75% or more of the gross income of the Company for such taxable year is passive income or (b) 50% or more of the assets held by the Company either produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income, based on the fair market value of such assets. “Gross income” generally means all revenues less cost of goods sold. “Passive income” includes, for example, dividends, interest, certain rents and royalties, certain gains from the sale of stock and securities, and certain gains from commodities transactions. However, for transactions entered into after December 31, 2004, gains arising from the sale of commodities

generally are excluded from passive income if substantially all of a foreign corporation’s commodities are (a) stock in trade of such foreign corporation or other property of a kind which would properly be included in inventory of such foreign corporation, or property held by such foreign corporation primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, (b) property used in the trade or business of such foreign corporation that would be subject to the allowance for depreciation under Section 167 of the Code, or (c) supplies of a type regularly used or consumed by such foreign corporation in the ordinary course of its trade or business.

For purposes of the PFIC income test and asset test described above, if the Company owns, directly or indirectly, 25% or more of the total value of the outstanding shares of another corporation, the Company will be treated as if it (a) held a proportionate share of the assets of such other corporation and (b) received directly a proportionate share of the income of such other corporation. In addition, for purposes of the PFIC income test and asset test described above, “passive income” does not include any interest, dividends, rents, or royalties that are received or accrued by the Company from a “related person” (as defined in Section 954(d)(3) of the Code), to the extent such items are properly allocable to the income of such related person that is not passive income.

In addition, if the Company is a PFIC and owns shares of another foreign corporation that also is a PFIC (a “Subsidiary PFIC”), under certain indirect ownership rules, a disposition of the shares of such other foreign corporation or a distribution received from such other foreign corporation generally will be treated as an indirect disposition by a U.S. Holder or an indirect distribution received by a U.S. Holder, subject to the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed below. To the extent that gain recognized on the actual disposition by a U.S. Holder of our common shares or income recognized by a U.S. Holder on an actual distribution received on our common shares was previously subject to U.S. federal income tax under these indirect ownership rules, such amount generally should not be subject to U.S. federal income tax.

The Company believes that it qualified as a PFIC for the taxable year ended December 31, 2008, and based on current business plans and financial projections, the Company expects that it will be a PFIC for the taxable year ending December 31, 2009. The determination of whether the Company will be a PFIC for a taxable year depends, in part, on the application of complex U.S. federal income tax rules, which are subject to differing interpretations. In addition, whether the Company will be a PFIC for its current taxable year depends on the assets and income of the Company over the course of each such taxable year and, as a result, cannot be predicted with certainty as of the date of this Form 20-F. Consequently, there can be no assurance regarding the Company’s PFIC status for any taxable year during which U.S. Holders hold our common shares, and there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge the determination made by the Company concerning its PFIC status.

If the Company is a PFIC, the U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. Holder of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of our common shares will depend on whether such U.S. Holder makes an election to treat the Company and each Subsidiary PFIC, if any, as a “qualified electing fund” or “QEF” under Section 1295 of the Code (a “QEF Election”) or a mark-to-market election under Section 1296 of the Code (a “Mark-to-Market Election”). A U.S. Holder that does not make either a QEF Election or a Mark-to-Market Election will be referred to in this summary as a “Non-Electing U.S. Holder.”

A Non-Electing U.S. Holder will be subject to the rules of Section 1291 of the Code with respect to (a) any gain recognized on the sale or other taxable disposition of our common shares and (b) any excess distribution paid on the common shares. A distribution generally will be an “excess distribution” to the extent that such distribution (together with all other distributions received in the current taxable year) exceeds 125% of the average distributions received during the three preceding taxable years (or during a U.S. Holder’s holding period for the common shares, if shorter).

Under Section 1291 of the Code, any gain recognized on the sale or other taxable disposition of our common shares, and any excess distribution paid on the common shares, must be ratably allocated to each day in a Non-Electing U.S. Holder’s holding period for the common shares. The amount of any such gain or excess

distribution allocated to prior years of such Non-Electing U.S. Holder’s holding period for the common shares (other than years prior to the first taxable year of the Company beginning after December 31, 1986 for which the Company was not a PFIC) will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the highest tax applicable to ordinary income in each such prior year. A Non-Electing U.S. Holder will be required to pay interest on the resulting tax liability for each such prior year, calculated as if such tax liability had been due in each such prior year. Such a Non-Electing U.S. Holder that is not a corporation must treat any such interest paid as “personal interest,” which is not deductible. The amount of any such gain or excess distribution allocated to the current year of such Non-Electing U.S. Holder’s holding period for the common shares will be treated as ordinary income in the current year, and no interest charge will be incurred with respect to the resulting tax liability for the current year.

If the Company is a PFIC for any taxable year during which a Non-Electing U.S. Holder holds our common shares, the Company will continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to such Non-Electing U.S. Holder, regardless of whether the Company ceases to be a PFIC in one or more subsequent years. A Non-Electing U.S. Holder may terminate this deemed PFIC status by electing to recognize gain (which will be taxed under the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above) as if such common shares were sold on the last day of the last taxable year for which the Company was a PFIC.

A U.S. Holder that makes a QEF Election generally will not be subject to the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above. However, a U.S. Holder that makes a QEF Election will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on such U.S. Holder’s pro rata share of (a) the net capital gain of the Company and each Subsidiary PFIC, which will be taxed as long-term capital gain to such U.S. Holder, and (b) and the ordinary earnings of the Company and each Subsidiary PFIC, which will be taxed as ordinary income to such U.S. Holder. Generally, “net capital gain” is the excess of (a) net long-term capital gain over (b) net short-term capital loss, and “ordinary earnings” are the excess of (a) “earnings and profits” over (b) net capital gain. A U.S. Holder that makes a QEF Election will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on such amounts for each taxable year in which the Company is a PFIC, regardless of whether such amounts are actually distributed to such U.S. Holder by the Company. However, a U.S. Holder that makes a QEF Election may, subject to certain limitations, elect to defer payment of current U.S. federal income tax on such amounts, subject to an interest charge. If such U.S. Holder is not a corporation, any such interest paid will be treated as “personal interest,” which is not deductible.

A U.S. Holder that makes a QEF Election generally (a) may receive a tax-free distribution from the Company to the extent that such distribution represents “earnings and profits” of the Company that were previously included in income by the U.S. Holder because of such QEF Election and (b) will adjust such U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the common shares to reflect the amount included in income or allowed as a tax-free distribution because of such QEF Election. In addition, a U.S. Holder that makes a QEF Election generally will recognize capital gain or loss on the sale or other taxable disposition of our common shares.

The procedure for making a QEF Election, and the U.S. federal income tax consequences of making a QEF Election, will depend on whether such QEF Election is timely. A QEF Election will be treated as “timely” if such QEF Election is made for the first year in the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the common shares in which the Company was a PFIC. A U.S. Holder may make a timely QEF Election by filing the appropriate QEF Election documents at the time such U.S. Holder files a U.S. federal income tax return for such first year in respect of the Company and each Subsidiary PFIC, if any. However, if the Company was a PFIC in a prior year, then in addition to filing the QEF Election documents, a U.S. Holder must elect to recognize (a) gain (which will be taxed under the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above) as if the common shares were sold on the qualification date or (b) if the Company was also a CFC, such U.S. Holder’s pro rata share of the post-1986 “earnings and profits” of the Company as of the qualification date. The “qualification date” is the first day of the first taxable year in which the Company was a QEF with respect to such U.S. Holder. The election to recognize such gain or “earnings and profits” can only be made if such U.S. Holder’s holding period for the common shares includes the qualification date. By electing to recognize such gain or “earnings and profits,” such U.S. Holder will be deemed to have made a timely QEF Election. In

addition, under very limited circumstances, a U.S. Holder may make a retroactive QEF Election if such U.S. Holder failed to file the QEF Election documents in a timely manner.

A QEF Election will apply to the taxable year for which such QEF Election is made and to all subsequent taxable years, unless such QEF Election is invalidated or terminated or the IRS consents to revocation of such QEF Election. If a U.S. Holder makes a QEF Election and, in a subsequent taxable year, the Company ceases to be a PFIC, the QEF Election will remain in effect (although it will not be applicable) during those taxable years in which the Company is not a PFIC. Accordingly, if the Company becomes a PFIC in another subsequent taxable year, the QEF Election will be effective and the U.S. Holder will be subject to the QEF rules described above during any such subsequent taxable year in which the Company qualifies as a PFIC. In addition, the QEF Election will remain in effect (although it will not be applicable) with respect to a U.S. Holder even after such U.S. Holder disposes of all of such U.S. Holder’s direct and indirect interest in the common shares. Accordingly, if such U.S. Holder reacquires an interest in the Company, such U.S. Holder will be subject to the QEF rules described above for each taxable year in which the Company is a PFIC.

U.S. Holders should be aware that there can be no assurances that the Company will satisfy the record keeping requirements that apply to a QEF, or that the Company will supply U.S. Holders with information that such U.S. Holders require to report under the QEF rules, in the event that the Company is a PFIC and a U.S. Holder wishes to make a QEF Election. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the availability of, and procedure for making, a QEF Election.

A U.S. Holder may make a Mark-to-Market Election only if the common shares are marketable stock. The common shares generally will be “marketable stock” if the common shares are regularly traded on (a) a national securities exchange that is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, (b) the national market system established pursuant to section 11A of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, or (c) a foreign securities exchange that is regulated or supervised by a governmental authority of the country in which the market is located, provided that (i) such foreign exchange has trading volume, listing, financial disclosure, and other requirements and the laws of the country in which such foreign exchange is located, together with the rules of such foreign exchange, ensure that such requirements are actually enforced and (ii) the rules of such foreign exchange ensure active trading of listed stocks.

A U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election generally will not be subject to the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above. However, if a U.S. Holder makes a Mark-to-Market Election after the beginning of such U.S. Holder’s holding period for the common shares and such U.S. Holder has not made a timely QEF Election, the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above will apply to certain dispositions of, and distributions on, the common shares.

A U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election will include in ordinary income, for each taxable year in which the Company is a PFIC, an amount equal to the excess, if any, of (a) the fair market value of the common shares as of the close of such taxable year over (b) such U.S. Holder’s tax basis in such common shares. A U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election will be allowed a deduction in an amount equal to the lesser of (a) the excess, if any, of (i) such U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the common shares over (ii) the fair market value of such common shares as of the close of such taxable year or (b) the excess, if any, of (i) the amount included in ordinary income because of such Mark-to-Market Election for prior taxable years over (ii) the amount allowed as a deduction because of such Mark-to-Market Election for prior taxable years.

A U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election generally also will adjust such U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the common shares to reflect the amount included in gross income or allowed as a deduction because of such Mark-to-Market Election. In addition, upon a sale or other taxable disposition of our common shares, a U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election will recognize ordinary income or loss (not to exceed the excess, if any, of (a) the amount included in ordinary income because of such Mark-to-Market Election for prior taxable years over (b) the amount allowed as a deduction because of such Mark-to-Market Election for prior taxable years).

A Mark-to-Market Election applies to the taxable year in which such Mark-to-Market Election is made and to each subsequent taxable year, unless the common shares cease to be “marketable stock” or the IRS consents to revocation of such election. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the availability of, and procedure for making, a Mark-to-Market Election.

Although a U.S. Holder may be eligible to make a Mark-to-Market Election with respect to the common shares, no such election may be made with respect to the stock of any Subsidiary PFIC that such U.S. Holder is treated as owning because such stock is not marketable. Hence, the Mark-to-Market Election will not be effective to eliminate the interest charge described above.

Under Section 1291(f) of the Code, the IRS has issued proposed Treasury Regulations that, subject to certain exceptions, would cause a U.S. Holder that had not made a timely QEF Election to recognize gain (but not loss) upon certain transfers of our common shares that would otherwise be tax-deferred (e.g., gifts and exchanges pursuant to corporate reorganizations). However, the specific U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. Holder may vary based on the manner in which our common shares are transferred.

Certain additional adverse rules will apply with respect to a U.S. Holder if the Company is a PFIC, regardless of whether such U.S. Holder makes a QEF Election. For example under Section 1298(b)(6) of the Code, a U.S. Holder that uses our common shares as security for a loan will, except as may be provided in Treasury Regulations, be treated as having made a taxable disposition of such common shares.

Special rules also apply to the amount of foreign tax credit that a U.S. Holder may claim on a distribution from a PFIC.

The PFIC rules are complex, and each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the PFIC rules and how the PFIC rules may affect the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of our common shares.

The following discussion summarizes the principal Canadian federal income tax considerations generally applicable to a person who owns one or more common shares of the Company (the "Shareholder"), and who at all material times for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the "Canadian Act") deals at arm's length with the Company, holds all common shares solely as capital property, is a non-resident of Canada, and does not, and is not deemed to, use or hold any Common share in or in the course of carrying on business in Canada. It is assumed that the common shares will at all material times be listed on a stock exchange that is prescribed for the purposes of the Canadian Act.

This summary is based on the current provisions of the Canadian Act, including the regulations thereunder, and the Canada-United States Income Tax Convention (1980) (the "Treaty") as amended. This summary takes into account all specific proposals to amend the Canadian Act and the regulations thereunder publicly announced by the government of Canada to the date hereof and the Company's understanding of the current published administrative and assessing practices of Canada Customs and Revenue Agency. It is assumed that all such amendments will be enacted substantially as currently proposed, and that there will be no other material change to any such law or practice, although no assurances can be given in these respects. Except to the extent otherwise expressly set out herein, this summary does not take into account any provincial, territorial or foreign income tax law or treaty.

This summary is not, and is not to be construed as, tax advice to any particular Shareholder. Each prospective and current Shareholder is urged to obtain independent advice as to the Canadian income tax consequences of an investment in common shares applicable to the Shareholder's particular circumstances.

A Shareholder generally will not be subject to tax pursuant to the Canadian Act on any capital gain realized by the Shareholder on a disposition of a Common share unless the Common share constitutes "taxable

Canadian property" to the Shareholder for purposes of the Canadian Act and the Shareholder is not eligible for relief pursuant to an applicable bilateral tax treaty. A Common share that is disposed of by a Shareholder will not constitute taxable Canadian property of the Shareholder provided that the Common share is listed on a stock exchange that is prescribed for the purposes of the Canadian Act (the Toronto Stock Exchange is so prescribed), and that neither the Shareholder, nor one or more persons with whom the Shareholder did not deal at arm's length, alone or together at any time in the five years immediately preceding the disposition owned, or owned any right to acquire, 25% or more of the issued shares of any class of the capital stock of the Company. In addition, the Treaty generally will exempt a Shareholder who is a resident of the United States for the purposes of the Treaty, and who would otherwise be liable to pay Canadian income tax in respect of any capital gain realized by the Shareholder on the disposition of a Common share, from such liability provided that the value of the Common share is not derived principally from real property (including resource property) situated in Canada or that the Shareholder does not have, and has not had within the 12-month period preceding the disposition, a "permanent establishment" or "fixed base," as those terms are defined for the purposes of the Treaty, available to the Shareholder in Canada. The Treaty may not be available to a non-resident Shareholder that is a U.S. LLC, which is not subject to tax in the U.S. Any dividend on a Common share, including a stock dividend, paid or credited, or deemed to be paid or credited, by the Company to a Shareholder will be subject to Canadian withholding tax at the rate of 25% on the gross amount of the dividend, or such lesser rate as may be available under an applicable income tax treaty. Pursuant to the Treaty, the rate of withholding tax applicable to a dividend paid on a Common share to a Shareholder who is a resident of the United States for the purposes of the Treaty will be reduced to 5% if the beneficial owner of the dividend is a company that owns at least 10% of the voting stock of the Company, and in any other case will be reduced to 15%, of the gross amount of the dividend. It is Canada Customs and Revenue Agency’s position that the Treaty reductions are not available to a Shareholder that is a "limited liability company" resident in the United States. The Company will be required to withhold any such tax from the dividend, and remit the tax directly to Canada Customs and Revenue Agency for the account of the Shareholder.

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this section.

Any documents referred to in this annual report may be inspected at the head office of the Company, 507 – 1540 West 2^nd Avenue, Vancouver , BC V6J 1H2, during normal business hours.

There is no information relating to the Company’s subsidiaries which must be provided in Canada and which is not otherwise called for by the body of generally accepted accounting principles used in preparing the financial statements.

The Company anticipates its primary market risk, if any, to be related to fluctuations in exchange rates. Exchange rate risk may arise if the Company is required to use different currencies for various aspects of its operations. At present, the functional currency for the Company is the Canadian dollar. Based on the Company’s overall exchange rate risk as at December 31, 2008 the Company believes that a ten percent change in exchange rates would have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations, or changes in financial position. This is primarily due to the level of debt that the Company has that is denominated in U.S. dollars. The Company intends to monitor its exchange rate risk and take reasonable

steps to reduce its exposure. The Company does not intend to purchase or sell derivative instruments for speculative purposes.

The Company’s operations do not employ financial instruments or derivatives; and given that the Company keeps its excess funds in high-grade short-term instruments, it does not have significant or unusual financial market risks.

A significant portion of our administrative / exploration operations and Company debts are denominated in US funds, so there is exposure to foreign exchange movements between the Canadian and the U.S. dollar.

We typically hold most of our funds in Canadian dollars and report the results of our operations in Canadian dollars and are therefore are subject to any material exchange rate risk.

Over the past 12 months, we have primarily financed ourselves through the issuance of debt. All of this debt has fixed rates of interest, and we are therefore not exposed to any interest rate fluctuations.

While the value of the Company’s resource properties, if any, can always be said to relate to the price of precious metals and the outlook for same, the Company does not have any operating mines and hence does not have any hedging or other commodity based operations risks respecting its business activities. We are exposed to market risk, primarily related to fluctuating prices in our common stock. See “Risk Factors”.

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

Other than has been disclosed in our December 31, 2008 financial statements in relation to a current default that exists with our US $1.79 million convertible loan, there has not been a material default in the payment of principal, interest, a sinking or purchase fund installment, or any other material default not cured within thirty days, relating to indebtedness of the Company or any of its significant subsidiaries. There are no payments of dividends by the Company in arrears, nor has there been any other material delinquency relating to any class of preference shares of the Company.

MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), the Company carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2008, being the date of the Company’s most recently completed fiscal year end. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Steve Manz and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Gordon Steblin. Based upon the evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting management to material information relating to it required to be included in the Company’s period SEC filings. There have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that significantly affected or could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date the Company carried out the evaluation.

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

During the Company’s most recently completed financial year ended December 31, 2008, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect, its internal control over financial reporting.

The term “internal control over financial reporting” is defined as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the registrant’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the registrant’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the registrant;

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the registrant are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the registrant; and

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use of disposition of the registrant’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

The purpose of the Audit Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors (the “Board”), of Freegold is to provide an open avenue of communication between Freegold’s management (“Management”), the independent Auditors (“Auditors”) and the Board and to assist the Board in its oversight of the following: integrity, adequacy and timeliness of Freegold’s financial reporting and disclosure practices; process for identifying the principal

financial risks of Freegold and the control systems in place to monitor them; compliance with legal and regulatory requirements related to financial reporting; and independence and performance of Freegold’s Auditors.

The Committee shall also perform any other activities consistent with the Charter, Freegold’s by-laws and governing laws as the Committee or Board deems necessary or appropriate.

The Committee’s role is one of oversight. It is not the responsibility of the Committee to determine that Freegold’s financial statements are complete and accurate and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles or to plan or conduct audits. The financial statements are the responsibility of Management. The Auditors are responsible for performing an audit and expressing an opinion on the fair presentation of Freegold’s financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

The Committee has the authority to conduct any investigation appropriate to its responsibilities, and it may request the Auditors as well as any officer of Freegold, or Freegold’s outside counsel, to attend a meeting of the Committee or to meet with any members of, or consultants to, the Committee. The Committee shall have unrestricted access to Freegold’s books and records and has the authority to retain, at Freegold’s expense, special legal, accounting, or other consultants or experts to assist in the performance of the Committee’s duties. Subject to Board approval, the Committee has the authority to set and pay the compensation of the advisors employed by the Committee. The Chairperson of the Committee (“Chairperson”) or other member of the Committee so designed by the Committee may represent the Committee to the extent permitted by applicable legal and listing requirements.

The Committee shall review and assess the adequacy of this Charter annually and submit any proposed revisions to the Board for approval.

The Committee and its membership shall meet all applicable legal, regulatory and listing requirements.

Members of the Committee and the Chairperson shall be appointed by the Board and may be removed by the Board in its discretion. The Committee will be elected annually at the first Board meeting following the annual general meeting.

The Committee shall be comprised of three or more directors, one of whom shall serve as Chairperson.

Each member of the Committee shall be independent, non-executive director, free from any relationship that, in the opinion of the Board, could reasonably be expected to interfere with the exercise of his or her independence from management, Freegold, or the Auditors.

All members of the Committee shall be, or promptly after appointment, shall become financially literate as determined by the Board. Preferably at least one member of the Committee shall have accounting or related financial management expertise as determined by the Board.

The Committee shall meet, at the discretion of the Chairperson or a majority of its members, as circumstances dictate or as may be required by applicable legal or listing requirement, and a majority of the members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum.

If and whenever a vacancy shall exist, the remaining members of the Committee may exercise all powers and responsibilities so long as quorum remains in office.

Any matters to be determined by the Committee shall be decided by a majority of votes cast at a meeting of the Committee called for such purpose; actions of the Committee may be taken by an instrument or instruments in writing signed by all of the members of the Committee, and such actions shall be effective as though they had been decided by a majority of votes cast at a meeting of the Committee called for such purpose. In the case of a tie the Chairperson shall have a second or tie-breaking vote.

The Committee shall maintain minutes of meetings and periodically report to the Board on significant results of the Committee’s activities.

The Committee may invite such other persons to its meetings as it deems appropriate.

With respect to the Interim and Annual Financial Statements, the MD&A, the AIF and the 20-F

The Committee shall review Freegold’s interim financial statements for approval prior to their being filed with the appropriate regulatory authorities. The Committee shall review Freegold’s annual audited financial statements and report thereon to prior to their being filed with the appropriate regulatory authorities. With respect to the annual audited financial statements, the Committee shall discuss significant issues regarding accounting principles, practices, and judgements of Management with Management and the Auditors and when the Committee deems it appropriate to do so.

The Committee shall review Management’s Discussion and Analysis relating to annual and interim financial statements, the Annual Information Form and any other public disclosure documents that are required to be reviewed by the Committee under any applicable laws prior to their being filed with the appropriate regulatory authorities.

The Committee shall review Management’s earnings releases relating to annual and interim financial statements and any other public disclosure documents that are required to be reviewed by the Committee under any applicable laws prior to their being filed with the appropriate regulatory authorities.

The Committee shall review the post-audit or management letter containing the recommendations of the Auditors and Management’s response and subsequent follow-up to any identified weaknesses.

The Committee shall review the evaluation of internal controls by the Auditors, together with Management’s response.

The Committee shall meet no less frequently than annually separately with the Auditors and the Chief Financial Officer to review Freegold’s accounting practices, internal controls and such other matters as the Committee or Chief Financial Officer deems appropriate.

The Auditors are ultimately accountable to the Board. The Board has the ultimate authority and responsibility to select, evaluate and, where appropriate, replace the Auditors (or nominate the Auditors to be proposed for shareholder approval in any proxy statement).

The Committee shall annually recommend to the Board the appointment of the Auditor, or, as appropriate, the discharge or replacement of the Auditors when circumstances warrant. The Board will set the compensation for the Auditors.

The Committee shall be responsible for ensuring that the Auditors submit on a periodic basis to the Committee a formal written statement delineating all relationships between the Auditors and Freegold. The Committee is responsible for discussing with the Auditors any disclosed relationships or services that may impact the objectivity and independence of the Auditors and for recommending that the Board take appropriate action in response to the Auditor’s report to satisfy itself of the Auditor’s independence.

Freegold considers the core services provided by the Auditors to include the annual audit, tax planning and tax compliance. The Committee shall review any engagements for non-audit services beyond the core services proposed to be provided by the Auditors or any of their affiliates, together with estimated fees, and consider the impact on the independence of the Auditors.

The Committee shall review the Auditor’s audit plan, including scope, procedures and timing of the audit.

The Committee shall perform any other activities consistent with the Charter and governing law, as the Committee or the Board deems necessary or appropriate including:

Establishing and reviewing Freegold’s procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, financial disclosure, internal controls or auditing matters.

Establishing and reviewing Freegold’s procedures for confidential, anonymous submissions by employees regarding questionable accounting, auditing and financial reporting and disclosure matters.

Conducting or authorizing investigations into any matters that the Committee believes is within the scope of its responsibilities.

Making inquiries of management and the Auditors to identify significant business, political, financial and control risks and exposures and assess the steps management has taken to minimize such risk.

Morris Medd, Hubert Marleau and Robert Jackson. Mr. Jackson resigned as a member of the Board of Directors and as an audit committee member on January 13, 2009.

Mr. Medd is an independent member of the audit committee and is financially literate. Mr. Medd has an understanding of internal controls and procedures for financial reporting.

Mr. Marleau is an independent member of the audit committee and is financially literate. With Mr. Marleau’s extensive work history working with private and public companies as a director, Mr. Marleau has an understanding of internal controls and procedures for financial reporting.

Mr. Jackson is an independent member of the audit committee and is financially literate. With Mr. Jackson’s extensive work history working with private and public companies as a director, Mr. Jackson has an understanding of internal controls and procedures for financial reporting.

The Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, and will provide to any person without charge, upon request by mail, telephone, telecopier or other electronic means of communication, a copy of such code of ethics. The Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, a copy of which is attached as an exhibit under Item 19.

The following table discloses the aggregate fees billed for each of the last two financial years for professional services rendered by the Company’s audit firm for various services.

From time to time, management of the Company recommends to and requests approval from the audit committee for non-audit services to be provided by the Company’s auditors. The audit committee routinely considers such requests at committee meetings, and if acceptable to a majority of the audit committee members, pre-approves such non-audit services by a resolution authorizing management to engage the Company’s auditors for such non-audit services, with set maximum dollar amount for each itemized service. During such deliberations, the audit committee assesses, among other factors, whether the services requested would be considered “prohibited services” as contemplated by the US Securities and Exchange Commission, and whether the services requested and the fees related to such services could impair the independence of the auditors.

See the Financial Statements and Exhibits listed in Item 19 hereof and filed as part of this Annual Report.

The following exhibits are filed with this Form 20-F Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2008:

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

Consolidated Statements of Loss and Comprehensive Loss for the Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.

Consolidated Schedules of Mineral Property Costs for the Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

Certification of CEO and CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

CEO Certification pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

CFO Certification pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Certificate of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer

incorporated by reference from our Form 20-F that was filed with the commission on March 30, 2008.

The Company certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

I, Steve Manz, Chief Executive Officer, of Freegold Ventures Limited, certify the following:

1. Review: I have reviewed the AIF, if any, annual financial statements and annual MD&A, including, for greater certainty, all documents and information that are incorporated by reference in the AIF (together, the "annual filings") of Freegold Ventures Limited (the "issuer") for the financial year ended December 31, 2008.

2. No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, for the period covered by the annual filings.

3. Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual financial statements together with the other financial information included in the annual filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the annual filings.

4. Responsibility: The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers' Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

5. Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the financial year end

(a) designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

(i) material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the annual filings are being prepared; and

(ii) information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

(b) designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer's GAAP.

5.1 Control framework: The control framework the issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer's ICFR is the integrated Framework issued by the Committee of sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

(a) evaluated, or caused to be evaluated under our supervision, the effectiveness of the issuer's DC&P at the financial year end and the issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A our conclusions about the effectiveness of DC&P at the financial year end based on that evaluation; and

(b) evaluated, or caused to be evaluated under our supervision, the effectiveness of the issuer's ICFR at the financial year end and the issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A

(i) our conclusions about the effectiveness of ICFR at the financial year end based on that evaluation; and

7. Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A any change in the issuer's ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on January 1, 2008 and ended on December 31, 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's ICFR.

8. Reporting to the issuer's auditors and board of directors or audit committee: The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of ICFR, to the issuer's auditors, and the board of directors or the audit committee of the board of directors any fraud that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's ICFR.

I, Gordon Steblin, Chief Financial Officer, of Freegold Ventures Limited, certify the following:

5. Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the financial year end

(a) designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that

(i) material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the annual filings are being prepared; and

(b) evaluated, or caused to be evaluated under our supervision, the effectiveness of the issuer's ICFR at the financial year end and the issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A

(i) our conclusions about the effectiveness of ICFR at the financial year end based on that evaluation; and

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its own behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

In connection with the accompanying annual report on Form 20F of Freegold Ventures Limited for the year ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof, the undersigned, in the capacity and date indicated below, hereby certifies that:

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

Based of my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the company and have:

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control of financial reporting.

The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our more recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management of other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

In connection with the annual report of Freegold Ventures Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20F for the period ended December, 31 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steve Manz, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 902 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

The Report fully complies with the requirement of section 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of the operations of the Company.

In connection with the annual report of Freegold Ventures Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20F for the period ended December, 31 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gordon Steblin, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 902 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

The Report fully complies with the requirement of section 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of the operations of the Company.

In my role as Chief Executive Office (“CEO”) or Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) of Freegold Ventures Limited (the “Company”), I have adhered to and advocated to the best of my knowledge and ability the following principles and responsibilities governing professional conduct and ethics:

Act with honesty and integrity, handling in an ethical manner any actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships. A “conflict of interest” exists when an individual’s private interests interfere or conflict in any way (or even appear to interfere or conflict) with the interests of the Company.

Provide constituents with information that is accurate, complete, objective, relevant, timely and understandable. If I am the CEO or CFO, I shall review the Company’s annual reports before certifying and filing them with the SEC.

Comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations of federal, provincial, territorial, state and local governments, and other appropriate private and public regulatory agencies.

Act in good faith, responsibly, with due care, competence and diligence, without misrepresenting material facts or allowing my independent judgement to be subordinated.

Respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of business except when authorized or otherwise legally obligated to disclose the information. I acknowledge that confidential information acquired in the course of business Is not to be used for personal advantage.

Promote ethical behaviour among employees at the Company and as a responsible partner with industry peers and associates.

Maintain control over and responsibly manage all assets and resources employed or entrusted to me by the Company.

Report illegal or unethical conduct by any director, officer or employee that has occurred, is occurring or may occur, including any potential violations of the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code”). Such report will be made to the Audit committee of the Board of Directors and shall include conduct of a financial or non-financial nature.

Comply with the Code. I understand that if I violate any part of the Code, I will be subject to disciplinary action.

I understand that the code is subject to all applicable laws, rules and regulations.

I understand that there shall be no waiver of, modification of, or change to any part of the Code except by a vote of the Board of Directors or a designated Board committee. In the event that a waiver of, modification of, or a change to the Code is granted, then the notice of the waiver, modification and/or change shall be posTed on the Company’s website within five business days of

the Board of Directors’ or designated Board committee’s vote or shall be disclosed otherwise as required by applicable law or Stock Exchange or SEC rules. Notices posted on the Company website shall remain there for a period for 12 months and shall be retained in the Company’s files as required by law.


o		REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR
x		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For fiscal year ended December 31^st, 2008
OR
o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____ to ______
OR
o		SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date of event requiring this shell company report:


CAUTIONARY NOTE TO U.S. INVESTORS REGARDING RESOURCE AND RESERVE ESTIMATES
GLOSSARY OF MINING TERMS
CONVERSION TABLE
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
PART I

ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS	8
ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE	8
ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION	8
ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY	22
ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS	76
ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES	82
ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS	98
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION	98
ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING	99
ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION	101
ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK	111

PART II

ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES	112
ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARS AND DELINQUENCIES	112
ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODICIATION STO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS	112
ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	113
ITEM 16. (RESERVED)	113
ITEM 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL REPORT	113
ITEM 16B. CODE OF ETHICS	116
ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES	116
ITEM 16D. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES	116
ITEM 16E. PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS	116

PART III

ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	117
ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	117
ITEM 19. EXHIBITS	117
SIGNATURES	118


Auramet:	Auramet Trading LLC
Avalon:	Avalon Development Corporation
Almaden Agreement:	The property option agreement dated May 6, 1996, between the Company and the Almaden Optionors.
Almaden Assignment Agreement:	The assignment agreement dated December 13, 1995, as amended February 28, 1996, between Compass and the Company
Almaden Option:	The option granted by the Almaden Optionors to the Company pursuant to the Almaden Agreement to acquire up to a 60% interest in the Almaden Property.
Almaden Optionors:	Collectively, Ican Minerals Ltd., Ican Minerals Inc. and Canu Resources Ltd.
Almaden Property:	Those mineral claims located in Washington County in the State of Idaho, USA, which the Company holds an interest in pursuant to the Almaden Agreement
Canu:	Canu Resources, Inc., a wholly owned U.S. subsidiary of Freegold Ventures Limited
Company:	Freegold Ventures Limited, and, where the context so requires, its subsidiary, Free Gold Recovery USA
DD:	Diamond Drill
Escrow Agent:	CIBC Mellon Trust Company
Exchange:	TSX Exchange
FEI:	Fairbanks Exploration Inc.
Fairbanks Assignment Agreement:	The assignment agreement dated May 30, 1997, as amended February 26, 1998, entered into between the Company and FEI
Freegold US:	Free Gold Recovery, USA, a wholly owned U.S. subsidiary of Freegold Ventures Limited
Freegold USA:	Freegold Ventures Limited, USA , a wholly owned U.S. subsidiary of Freegold Ventures Limited
Golden Summit Property:	The mineral claims located in the Fairbanks Mining District in the State of Alaska, USA
g/t (or gpt):	Grams of gold per metric tonne of rock
Homestake:	Homestake Mining Company (now by Barrick Gold Corporation)
km:	Kilometres
Keystone:	Keystone Mines Partnership
Ican:	Ican Minerals, Inc., a wholly owned U.S. subsidiary of Freegold Ventures Limited
NSR:	Net Smelter Return
oz/t (or opt):	Troy ounces of gold per imperial ton of rock
oz:	Troy ounce
ppm:	Parts per million
ppb:	Parts per billion
RAB:	Rotary Air Blast Drilling
RC:	Reverse circulation
Tiomin:	Tiomin Resources Inc.


Imperial Measure =	Metric Unit	Metric Measure =	Imperial Unit
2.47 acres	1 hectare	0.4047 hectares	1 acre
3.28 feet	1 meter	0.3048 meters	1 foot
0.62 miles	1 kilometer	1.609 kilometers	1 mile
0.032 ounces (troy)	1 gram	31.1 grams	1 ounce (troy)
1.102 tons (short)	1 tonne	0.907 tonnes	1 ton
0.029 ounces (troy)/ton	1 gram/tonne	34.28 grams/tonne	1 ounce (troy/ton)


	2008	2007	2006	2005	2004
Cash	7,335	4,303,786	377,426	544,275	1,573,522
Total Assets	31,645,153	23,722,900	12,381,233	9,431,704	10,442,657
Current Liabilities	10,433,676	424,139	1,562,006	123,638	277,768
Loss under Canadian GAAP	(2,849,449)	(2,746,375)	(1,510,665)	(1,328,008)	(1,381,717)
Mineral Properties Written Off	-	(1,612,484)	(332,806)	(40,020)	(788,376)
Other Items	32,377	259,063	126,882	(342)	151,404
Amortization of Equipment	(453,968)	161,088	-	-	-
Foreign Exchange Loss	(1,173,327)	(61,373)	(28,675)	-	-
Interest Expense	(721,494)	(62,206)	(27,369)	-	-
Future income tax recovery	-	-	-	-	365,968
Net Loss	(5,165,861)	(4,384,463)	(1,772,633)	(1,368,370)	(1,652,721)
Deficit	(33,937,088)	(28,764,249)	(24,291,685)	(22,479,334)	(21,104,497)
Weighted Avg # Shares O/S	63,687,408	52,257,573	37,459,602	30,506,308	26,847,155
Loss Per Share	(0.08)	(0.08)	(0.05)	(0.04)	(0.06)


Period		Average
Year ended December 31, 2004	$	1.301
Year ended December 31, 2005	$	1.211
Year ended December 31, 2006	$	1.134
Year ended December 31, 2007	$	1.074
Year ended December 31, 2008	$	1.067


Period		Low		High
Month ended February 28, 2009	$	1.2377	$	1.2531
Month ended January 31, 2009	$	1.2161	$	1.2356
Month ended December 31, 2008	$	1.2247	$	1.2447
Month ended November 30, 2008	$	1.2069	$	1.2313
Month ended October 31, 2008	$	1.1695	$	1.1924
Month ended September 30, 2008	$	1.0521	$	1.0636


No.	Claim Name	Section	Township	Range	ADL #	Recording Dist	Owner
1	Greenback 1	35	3N	1E	359771	Fairbanks	Earl Beistline
2	Greenback 2	35	3N	1E	359772	Fairbanks	Earl Beistline
3	Greenback 3	26	3N	1E	361184	Fairbanks	Earl Beistline
4	Greenback 4	25	3N	1E	505192	Fairbanks	Earl Beistline
5	Newsboy	26	3N	1E	333135	Fairbanks	Earl Beistline
6	Newsboy Extension	25	3N	1E	333136	Fairbanks	Earl Beistline
7	What's Next #1	24	3N	2E	501821	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
8	What's Next #2	24	3N	2E	501822	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
9	What's Next #3	24	3N	2E	501823	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
10	What's Next #4	24	3N	2E	501824	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
11	What's Next #5	22	3N	2E	502196	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
12	What's Next #6	22	3N	2E	502197	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
13	What's Next #7	22	3N	2E	502198	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
14	What's Next #8	22	3N	2E	502199	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
15	Crane #1	24	3N	2E	502551	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks


16	Crane #2	24	3N	2E	502552	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
17	Crane #3	24	3N	2E	502553	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
18	Crane #4	24	3N	2E	501930	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
19	Anticline #1	24	3N	2E	501825	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
20	Anticline #2	24	3N	2E	501836	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
21	Ruby 3A Fraction	25	3N	1E	515911	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
22	Ruby 4A Fraction	25	3N	1E	515912	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
23	Ruby 5 Fraction	25	3N	1E	515913	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
24	Ruby 6 Fraction	25	3N	1E	515914	Fairbanks	Freegold – Fairbanks
25	Ruby 7 Fraction	25	3N	1E	515915	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
26	Ruby 8 Fraction	30	3N	2E	515916	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
27	Ruby 9 Fraction	30	3N	2E	515917	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
28	Ruby 10 Fraction	30	3N	2E	515918	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
29	Ruby 11 Fraction	30	3N	2E	515919	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
30	Ruby 12 Fraction	29	3N	2E	515920	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
31	Ruby 13 Fraction	29	3N	2E	515921	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
32	Ruby 14 Fraction	29	3N	2E	515922	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
33	Ruby 15 Fraction	29	3N	2E	515923	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
34	Ruby 16 Fraction	28	3N	2E	515924	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
35	Ruby 17 Fraction	28	3N	2E	515925	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
36	Ruby 18 Fraction	28	3N	2E	515926	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
37	Ruby 19 Fraction	28	3N	2E	515927	Fairbanks	Freegold - Fairbanks
38	FRG # 1	31	3N	2E	558129	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery
39	FRG # 2	31	3N	2E	558130	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery
40	FRG # 3	31	3N	2E	558131	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery
41	FRG # 4	31	3N	2E	558132	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery
42	FRG # 5	32	3N	2E	575592	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery
43	FRG # 6	32	3N	2E	575593	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery
44	Erik 1	18	3N	2E	574226	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery
45	Erik 2	18	3N	2E	574227	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery
46	Erik 3	18	3N	2E	574228	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery
47	Kelly 1	27	3N	2E	574122	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery
48	Kelly 2	27	3N	2E	574123	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery
49	Kelly 3	27	3N	2E	574124	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery
50	Kelly 4	27	3N	2E	574125	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery
51	Kelly 5	27	3N	2E	574126	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery
52	Kelly 6	27	3N	2E	574127	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery
53	Starbuck 1	16	3N	3E	574128	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery
54	Starbuck 2	16	3N	3E	574129	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery
55	Starbuck 3	16	3N	3E	574130	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery
56	Starbuck 4	16	3N	3E	574131	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery
57	Butterfly 1	33	3N	3E	575583	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery
58	Butterfly 2	33	3N	3E	575584	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery
59	Butterfly 3	33, 34	3N	3E	575585	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery
60	Butterfly 4	3, 4	2N	3E	575586	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery
61	Butterfly 5	3	2N	3E	575587	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery
62	Butterfly 6	34	3N	3E	575588	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery
63	Butterfly 7	34	3N	3E	575589	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery
64	Butterfly 8	33	3N	3E	575590	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery
65	Eldorado #1	27	3N	1E	575591	Fairbanks	Freegold Recovery


66	Blueberry	21	3N	2E	308497	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
67	Robin 1	28	3N	2E	308498	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
68	Robin 2	29	3N	2E	308499	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
69	Robin 3	29	3N	2E	308500	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
70	Robin 4	29	3N	2E	308501	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
71	Robin 5	29	3N	2E	308502	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
72	Robin 6	30	3N	2E	308503	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
73	Ing Fraction	22	3N	2E	315014	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
74	Gene Fraction	22	3N	2E	315015	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
75	Beta Fraction	22	3N	2E	315016	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
76	Alpha Fraction	21,22	3N	2E	315017	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
77	Arnold Fraction	22	3N	2E	315018	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
78	Alabama	30	3N	2E	F45603	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
79	Disc. on Bedrock Cr.	24,25	3N	1E	F45604	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
80	July #1	30	3N	2E	F45605	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
81	July #2	30	3N	2E	F45606	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
82	July #3	30	3N	2E	F45607	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
83	July Frac. #4	30	3N	2E	F45608	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
84	Liberty Lode #1	30	3N	2E	F45609	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
85	Liberty Lode #2	30	3N	2E	F45610	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
86	Liberty Lode #3	30	3N	2E	F45611	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
87	Millsite Fraction	30	3N	2E	F45612	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
88	New York Mineral	24,25	3N	1E	F45613	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
89	No Name	30	3N	2E	F45614	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
90	#1 Ab. Disc. on Bedrock	30	3N	2E	F45615	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
91	Snow Drift	19	3N	2E	F45616	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
92	Texas	19	3N	2E	F45617	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
93	Wyoming Quartz	30	3N	2E	F45618	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
94	Wyoming Frac.	25	3N	1E	F45619	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
95	Button Weezer	27,28	3N	2E	F45620	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
96	Caribou Frac.	21,28	3N	2E	F45621	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
97	Caribou #1	21,22	3N	2E	F45622	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
98	Caribou #2	21,22	3N	2E	F45623	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
99	Fern	28	3N	2E	F45624	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
100	Free Gold	21	3N	2E	F45625	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
101	Henry Ford #1	28	3N	2E	F45626	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
102	Henry Ford #2	21	3N	2E	F45627	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
103	Henry Ford #3	28	3N	2E	F45628	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
104	Henry Ford #4	28	3N	2E	F45629	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
105	Laughing Water	21	3N	2E	F45630	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
106	Little Jim	28	3N	2E	F45631	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
107	Minnie Ha Ha	21	3N	2E	F45632	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
108	Pennsylvania	21	3N	2E	F45633	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
109	Ruth Frac.	21	3N	2E	F45634	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
110	Speculator	28	3N	2E	F45635	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
111	Wolf Lode	20,21	3N	2E	F45636	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
112	Bonus	22	3N	2E	F45637	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
113	Don	15,22	3N	2E	F45638	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
114	Durando	22	3N	2E	F45639	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
115	Edythe	15,22	3N	2E	F45640	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines


116	Flying Joe	22	3N	2E	F45641	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
117	Gold Point	22	3N	2E	F45642	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
118	Helen S.	23	3N	2E	F45643	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
119	Hi Yu	23	3N	2E	F45644	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
120	Hi Yu Millsite	23	3N	2E	F45645	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
121	Homestake	23	3N	2E	F45646	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
122	Inez	22	3N	2E	F45647	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
123	Insurgent #1	23	3N	2E	F45648	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
124	Insurgent #2	23	3N	2E	F45649	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
125	Julia	15,22	3N	2E	F45650	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
126	Jumbo	22	3N	2E	F45651	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
127	Laura	22	3N	2E	F45652	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
128	Lillian	23	3N	2E	F45653	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
129	Long Shin	23	3N	2E	F45654	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
130	Mame	14,15	3N	2E	F45655	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
131	Mayflower	22,27	3N	2E	F45656	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
132	Mohawk	22	3N	2E	F45657	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
133	#1 Moose Gulch	23	3N	2E	F45658	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
134	#2 Moose Gulch	23	3N	2E	F45659	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
135	N.R.A.	15	3N	2E	F45660	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
136	Nars	22,23	3N	2E	F45661	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
137	O'Farrel Frac.	23	3N	2E	F45662	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
138	Ohio	22	3N	2E	F45663	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
139	Rand	23	3N	2E	F45664	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
140	Red Top	22	3N	2E	F45665	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
141	Rob	23	3N	2E	F45666	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
142	Royalty	15	3N	2E	F45667	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
143	Santa Clara Frac.	23	3N	2E	F45668	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
144	Summit	22,23	3N	2E	F45669	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
145	Sunnyside	22	3N	2E	F45670	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
146	Teddy R.	23	3N	2E	F45671	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
147	Yankee Doodle	23	3N	2E	F45672	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
148	Insurgent #3	14,23	3N	2E	F45673	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
149	Roy	23	3N	2E	F45674	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
150	Freegold	19	3N	2E	MS821	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
151	Colorado	19,30	3N	2E	MS1639	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
152	California	19,30	3N	2E	MS1639	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
153	Pauper's Dream	30	3N	2E	MS1639	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
154	Idaho	30	3N	2E	MS1639	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
155	Keystone	20,21	3N	2E	MS1607	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
156	Kawalita	20,21	3N	2E	MS1607	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
157	Fairbanks	21	3N	2E	MS1607	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
158	Hope	21	3N	2E	MS1607	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
159	Willie	21	3N	2E	MS2198	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
160	Marigold	21,28	3N	2E	MS2198	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
161	Pioneer	21	3N	2E	MS2198	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
162	Henry Ford	21,28	3N	2E	MS2198	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
163	Henry Clay	21	3N	2E	MS2198	Fairbanks	Keystone Mines
164	Willow Creek #1	25,26	T3N	R1E	24963	Fairbanks	Hart, Haskins
165	Willow Creek #2	25	T3N	R1E	24964	Fairbanks	Hart, Haskins


166	Willow Creek #3	25	T3N	R1E	24965	Fairbanks	Hart, Haskins
167	Willow Ck. #1 Placer	25	T3N	R1E	24966	Fairbanks	Hart, Haskins
168	VDH-AMS #1	25	T3N	R1E	344681	Fairbanks	Hart, Haskins, St. AK
169	VDH-AMS #2	25	T3N	R1E	344682	Fairbanks	Hart, Haskins, St. AK
170	VDH-AMS #3	25	T3N	R1E	344683	Fairbanks	Hart, Haskins, St. AK


Hole #	Prospect	Elev. (ft)	Azim. (°)	Angle (°)	TD (ft)
GSDC0801	Cleary Fence 1	1542.60	180	-45	501
GSDC0802	Cleary Fence 1	1556.09	360	-60	201
GSDC0803	Cleary Fence 1	1558.31	360	-60	301
GSDC0804	Cleary Fence 1	1586.48	360	-60	401
GSDC0805	Cleary Fence 1	1599.50	360	-60	750
GSDC0806	Beistline Pit: Pad #1	1565.19	27	-45	107
GSDC0807	Beistline Pit: Pad #1	1566.09	27	-90	197
GSDC0808	Beistline Pit: Pad #2	1567.02	27	-90	217
GSDC0809	Beistline Pit: Pad #2	1567.32	27	-45	240
GSDC0810	Beistline Pit: Pad #3	1567.11	27	-45	241
GSDC0811	Beistline Pit: Pad #3	1566.99	27	-90	211
GSDC0812	Beistline Pit: Pad #4	1566.88	27	-90	215
GSDC0813	Beistline Pit: Pad #4	1566.38	27	-45	239
GSDC0814	Beistline Pit: Pad #5	1565.77	27	-45	196
GSDC0815	Beistline Pit: Pad #5	1565.98	27	-90	219.5
GSDC0816	Cleary Fence 1: 100E	1569.92	360	-60	327
GSDC0817	Cleary Fence 1: 100E	1579.36	360	-60	386
GSDC0818	Cleary Fence 1: 100E	1597.55	360	-60	766.5
GSDC0819	Cleary Fence 1: 100E	1614.08	360	-60	761
GSDC0820	Cleary Fence 1: 200E	1579.41	360	-60	535.5
GSDC0821	Cleary Fence 1: 200E	1591.83	360	-60	404
GSDC0822	Cleary Fence 1: 200E	1600.89	360	-60	671
GSDC0823	Cleary Fence 1: 200E	1624.17	360	-60	752
				TOTAL	8,839.5


2007 Pit ID	Material ID	Material Wt. (Tons)
Beistline	BST High Grade	3520
Beistline	BST Low Grade	3584
Fence 1	F1 Low Grade	2870
	TOTAL:	9974


2008 Pit	High Grade (tons)	Low Grade (tons)	Waste (tons)
Beistline	4920	3480	25710
Fence 1	5220	2160	22522
Cleary Hill vein	8160	6376	28127
TOTAL:	18,300	12,016	76,359


Hole #	Prospect	Elev. (ft)	Azim. (°)	Angle (°)	TD (ft)
GSDC0824	Tolovana	1462.87	320	-45	517
GSDC0825	Tolovana	1462.90	320	-60	347
GSDC0826	Tolovana	1463.03	320	-75	360


Hole Number	From (feet)	To (feet)	Thickness (feet)	Gold Grade (g/tonne)	Gold Grade (oz/ton)
GSDC0824	89	99.5	10.5	2.40	0.069
GSDC0824	232.5	238	5.5	0.75	0.022
GSDC0824	258	265	5	1.84	0.054
GSDC0824	282	288.5	6.5	0.68	0.020
GSDC0824	381.5	386	4.5	0.91	0.270
GSDC0825	95	102	7	21.8	0.636
including	99	102	3	49.7	1.45
GSDC0825	187	187.5	0.5	26.6	0.776
GSDC0825	232.5	236.5	4	0.81	0.024
including	232.5	233	0.5	5.55	0.162
GSDC0826	11	22	11	2.09	0.610
including	18.5	22	3.5	4.97	0.145
GSDC0826	99.5	105	5.5	1.18	0.034
GSDC0826	210	210.5	0.5	28.53	0.832
GSDC0826	359	360	1	4.11	0.120


Hole #	From (ft)	To (ft)	Thickness (ft)	Au opt
CC-8	120	160	40	0.038
SW-1	30	60	30	0.041
SW-10	20	120	100	0.024
SW-12	80	150	70	0.043
SW-13	100	237	137	0.048
SW-17	20	60	40	0.026
SW-2	60	203	143	0.025
SW-30	50	110	60	0.022
SW-4	70	100	30	0.027
SW-40	90.5	225.3	134.8	0.065
Including	90.5	147	56.5	0.116
And	100.3	112.6	12.3	0.336
SW-43	96	143	47	0.030


727	5	185	180	0.034%
728	5	300	295	0.026%
729	5	120	115	0.034%
730	5	150	145	0.026%
731	10	185	175	0.050%
C42	25	120	95	0.065%
C70	90	150	60	0.047%
C77	0	205	205	0.031%


Hole Number	Azimuth/ Angle	From (foot)	To (foot)	Thickness (feet)	Gold Grade (oz/ton)	Comments
664	90/-60	20	265	245	0.027	Crossed main fault into footwall at roughly 260 feet.
including		20	130	110	0.050
659	90/-70	20	120	100	0.025	Lost hole at 120 feet. 0.032 oz/ton average for bottom 60 feet.
including		65	120	60	0.032
656	90/-45	65	375	310	0.016	Confirms depth and grade of mineralization
including		155	285	130	0.025
654A	90/-45	40	415	375	0.020	Crossed main fault in he footwall between 430 and to 450 feet.
including		80	130	50	0.051
including		150	255	105	0.031
654	vertical	15	350	335	0.019	Hole ended in mineralization above cut-off grade
including		125	180	55	0.040
including		265	300	35	0.045


C-57	245	305	60	0.024	0.83	High-grade mineralization in new breccia zone underneath clay alteration cap
including	285	305	20	0.045	1.55	Highest grades within the last 20 feet of hole
C-70	125	235	110	0.017	0.60	Further NW extension of mineralization within the Main Zone
including	135	150	15	0.045	1.53


	Main	Zone	Main	Zone
Elevation Interval (ft)	Tons, 1000’s	Opt Au	Tons, 1000’s	Opt Au
3700-3720	118	0.017	81	0.019
3680-3700	224	0.019	246	0.022
3660-3680	295	0.021	357	0.024
3640-3660	354	0.021	386	0.023
3620-3640	433	0.019	421	0.02
3600-3620	509	0.017	330	0.016
3580-3600	598	0.016	234	0.014
3560-3580	568	0.014	103	0.012
3540-3560	659	0.017	74	0.013
3520-3540	847	0.02	20	0.014
3500-3520	1,043	0.023
3480-3500	1,371	0.024
3460-3480	1,501	0.026
3440-3460	1,563	0.026
3420-3440	1,506	0.025
3400-3420	1,555	0.023
3380-3400	1,538	0.022
3360-3380	1,452	0.021
3340-3360	1,403	0.02
3320-3340	1,334	0.019
3300-3320	1,117	0.017
3280-3300	792	0.016
3260-3280	640	0.015
3240-3260	487	0.014
3220-3240	303	0.013
3200-3220	116	0.015
3180-3200	52	0.013
3160-3180	25	0.013
3140-3160	57	0.012
3120-3140	39	0.013
3100-3120	27	0.012
Zone Totals	22,526	0.021	2,252	0.019
Total Indicated	24,778	0.021


Cutoff Grade (opt gold)	Main, North & NW Zones, Indicated Mineral Resources
Cutoff Grade (opt gold)	Tons, 1000’s	Grade (opt gold)
0.006	42.9	0.015
0.008	34.6	0.017
0.011	24.8	0.021
0.012	22.2	0.022


Core Hole No.	Split A (opt)	Split B (opt)	Split C (opt)	Split Avg. (opt)	From (ft)	To (ft)	Block Model Average (opt)	Percent Difference
27	0.021	0.025	0.023	0.023	12	189	0.018	27.64%
28	0.022	0.021	0.021	0.021	20	110	0.019	9.74%
29	0.018	0.017	0.016	0.017	4	165	0.017	-2.36%
30	0.020	0.020	0.017	0.019	0	160	0.016	18.56%


Gold Price Per Ounce	Annual Royalty Payment
Less than US$350	US$30,000
US$350 to US$400	US$40,000
More than US$400	US$50,000


		Payments	Shares		Exploration Expenditures
- Within 5 days from approval date (received)	$	-	30,000	$	-
- On or before 1 July 2003 (received / completed)		20,000	-		30,000
- On or before 30 January 2004 (received)		-	30,000		-
- On or before 1 July 2004 (received / completed)		20,000	-		30,000
- On or before 1 July 2005 (received / completed)		30,000	-		340,000
- On or before 1 July 2006 (received / completed)		30,000	-		600,000
	$	100,000	60,000	$	1,000,000


Fiscal year ended Dec. 31,	2009	2010	2011	Thereafter

Office lease - Vancouver	$21,667	-	-	-
Office lease - Idaho	$14,310	-	-	-


Financial Year Ending	Audit Fees	Audit Related Fees	Tax Fees	All Other Fees

December 31, 2008	$29,000	$ Nil	$ 1,500	$ Nil
December 31, 2007	$35,000	$ Nil	$ Nil	$ Nil


				Percentage of Issued and Outstanding Shares as of February 28, 2009
Shares issued upon exercise of incentive stock options	2,984,500	4.56%
Shares reserved for issuance pursuant to unexercised incentive stock options	2,273,841	3.47%
Unallocated shares available for future grants of incentive stock options	0	0%
TOTAL	5,258,341		8.04%


		Percentage of Issued and Outstanding Shares as of February 28, 2009
Shares issued upon exercise of incenztive stock options	0	0%
Shares issued upon exercise of performance shares	0	0%
Shares reserved for issuance for unexercised incentive stock options	2,536,659	3.88%
Shares reserved for issuance for the unexercised performance shares	0	0%
Unallocated shares available for future grants of incentive stock options and/or performance shares	1,526,528	2.33%
TOTAL	4,063,187		6.21%


Optionee	Number of Shares Subject to Option	Date of Grant	Exercise Price ($/Security)	Expiration Date
Director	100,000	February 8, 2008	$1.50	February 8, 2013
Consultants	325,000	February 21, 2008	$1.42	February 21, 2013
Officers	1,845,000	February 21, 2008	$1.42	February 21, 2013
Consultants	240,000	February 21, 2008	$1.42	February 21, 2013
Consultants	150,000	April 10, 2008	$1.42	April 10, 2010
	2,660,000


Optionee	Number of Shares Exercised	Date of Grant	Exercise Price ($/Security)	Expiration Date
Consultants	500,000	September 10, 2003	$0.48	September 10, 2008
Officers	30,000	March 13, 2006	$0.35	March 13, 2011
Consultants	24,500	September 10, 2003	$0.48	September 10, 2008
	554,500


Shareholder Name and Address	Number of Shares Held	Percentage of Issued Shares
CDS & Company 25 Esplanade Toronto, ON, Canada	49,113,392	78.87%
Cede & Co Box 20, Bowling Green Stn New York, NY, USA	9,562,802	14.77%


December 31	High (US $)	Low (US $)	Volume

2008	2.20	0.09	6,739,700
2007	2.85	0.38	8,324,181
2006	0.59	0.152	4,724,490
2005	0.28	0.096	3,049,968
2004	0.51	0.18	2,323,439


Services		Year ended December 31, 2008		Year ended December 31, 2007

Audit Services	$	29,000	$	35,000
Audit – and review – related services	$	Nil	$	Nil
Tax services	$	1,500	$	Nil
All other services	$	Nil	$	Nil
	$	30,500	$	35,000