FORM 10-K

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
Commission file number 001-33138

KBW, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		13-4055775
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

787 Seventh Avenue, New York, New York 10019
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
212-887-7777

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


(Title of Each Class)		(Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered)

Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share		New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large Accelerated filer þ	Accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company o
	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No þ

The aggregate market value of the common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 29, 2007 was approximately $800 million. For purposes of this information, the outstanding shares of common stock owned by directors and executive officers of the registrant were deemed to be shares of common stock held by affiliates.

On February 15, 2008, there were 29,415,652 outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, which is the registrant’s only class of common stock, excluding 1,350,329 shares underlying restricted stock units and 3,938,736 restricted shares issued under restricted stock awards.

Documents incorporated by reference: Portions of the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be delivered to stockholders in connection with the 2008 annual meeting of stockholders to be held on June 3, 2008 are incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K. Such definitive proxy statement will be filed by the registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

We have made statements in this Form 10-K in Item 1 — “Business”, Item 1A — “Risk Factors”, Item 3 — “Legal Proceedings”, Item 7 — “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and in other sections of this Form 10-K that are forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “may,” “might,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential” or “continue,” the negative of these terms and other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements, which are based on various underlying assumptions and expectations and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other unknown factors, may include projections of our future financial performance based on our growth strategies and anticipated trends in our business. These statements are only predictions based on our current expectations and projections about future events. There are or may be important factors that could cause our actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from the historical or future results, level of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, those discussed under Item 1A — “Risk Factors” in this Form 10-K.

Although we believe the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, level of activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any of these forward-looking statements. You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. We are under no duty to update any of these forward-looking statements after the date of filing of this report to conform such statements to actual results or revised expectations.

When we use the terms “KBW,” “KBW, Inc.,” “the Company,” “we,” “us” and “our,” we mean the combined business of KBW, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and of its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise indicates. KBW, Inc. became the holding company for all other subsidiary operating companies in August 2005. Prior to August 2005, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc., now an operating subsidiary, was the parent company and references to “KBW” or the “Company” or “we”, “us” and “our” prior to August 2005 refer to the consolidated company structure prior to that date. All data provided herein is as of or for the period ended December 31, 2007 unless otherwise expressly noted.

Item 1. Business.

Overview

We are a full service investment bank specializing in the financial services industry. Since our founding in 1962, our commitment to this industry, our long-term relationships with clients and our recognized industry expertise have made us a trusted advisor to our corporate clients and a valuable resource for our institutional investor customers. We have built our reputation for excellence in financial services on the basis of our research platform, our senior professionals, our track record of market innovation, and the strength of our execution capabilities.

Our business is organized into four general service offerings: (i) investment banking, including mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”) and other strategic advisory services, equity and fixed income securities offerings, structured finance for trust preferred and similar capital securities of financial institutions and mutual thrift conversions, (ii) equity and fixed income sales and trading, with an emphasis on institutional customers investing in the small and mid cap segments, and a wide range of fixed income securities, (iii) research that provides fundamental, objective analysis that identifies investment opportunities and helps our investor customers make better investment decisions, and (iv) asset management, including investment management and other advisory services to institutional clients and private high net worth clients and various investment vehicles.

Within our full service business model, our focus includes bank and thrift holding companies, banking companies, thrift institutions, insurance companies, broker-dealers, mortgage banks, asset management companies, mortgage and equity real estate investment trusts (“REITs”), consumer and specialty finance firms, financial processing companies and securities exchanges. As of December 31, 2007, our research department covered an aggregate of 569 financial services companies, including 418 companies in the United States and 151 in Europe. Our revenues are derived from a broad range of products and sectors within the financial services industry.

We emphasize serving investment banking clients in the small and mid cap segments of the financial services industry, market segments that we believe have traditionally been underserved by larger investment banks. We are dedicated to building long-term relationships and growing with our clients, providing them with capital raising opportunities and strategic advice at every stage of their development. We have continued to provide services to many of our clients as they have grown to be large cap financial institutions. In recent years, we have also provided financial advisory services to large cap financial services companies who were not previously long-term investment banking clients. These companies have increasingly sought out independent advice. Our sales force is trained in the analysis of financial services companies and has strong customer relationships with many of the world’s largest institutional investors.

We operate through a U.S. registered broker-dealer, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc., a U.S. registered investment advisor, KBW Asset Management, Inc. and Keefe, Bruyette & Woods

Limited, an investment firm authorized and regulated by the U.K. Financial Services Authority. We have ten broker-dealer offices with our headquarters in New York City and other offices in Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Columbus (Ohio), Hartford, Houston, Richmond (Virginia), San Francisco and London. Our asset management company is located in New York City in the same building as our headquarters. Due to the integrated nature of financial markets, we manage our business based on the enterprise as a whole. We do not present revenues by geographic region, as such presentation is impracticable.

Our company was directly affected by the tragedies of September 11, 2001. Our headquarters in the World Trade Center was destroyed and 67 employees, nearly half of our New York staff, perished that day. Five of our nine board members, including our co-CEO and Chairman, died. The employees of several departments, including equity trading and fixed income sales and trading and research, were nearly completely lost. Despite these losses, the depth of experience and longevity of our employee base and their personal commitment to rebuilding our company left us with people with the knowledge and commitment to continue, renew and significantly grow our business. After September 11, 2001, we actively reconstituted and grew our company from 157 surviving employees to 529 employees as of December 31, 2007.

Our Principal Businesses

Investment Banking

Our investment banking practice provides a broad range of investment banking services to bank and thrift holding companies, banks and thrifts, insurance companies, broker-dealers, mortgage banks, asset management companies, REITs, consumer and specialty finance firms, financial processing companies and securities exchanges. The services we provide include:

	•		M&A and other strategic advisory services,

	•		Equity and fixed income securities offerings,

	•		Structured finance for trust preferred securities and similar capital securities of financial institutions, and

	•		Mutual thrift conversions.

Our investment banking practice is based on long-term relationships developed by the department’s professionals operating from our offices in New York, London, Boston, Chicago, Columbus (Ohio), Hartford, Houston, Richmond (Virginia), and San Francisco. The locations of our U.S. offices enable us to identify local and regional opportunities and provide clients with locally-based services, while keeping in close touch with developments in major financial centers and leveraging product expertise largely headquartered in New York and London. Our international presence enables us to act on opportunities for financial companies on an international basis for investment and transactional purposes. We strive to offer our clients a high level of attention from senior personnel and have designed our organizational structure so that our investment bankers who are responsible for securing and maintaining client relationships also actively participate in providing all related transaction execution services to those clients.

We believe that the intensity of our focus on the financial services industry and the depth of our professionals’ experience have enabled us to respond creatively and effectively when traditional solutions fall short of achieving a client’s goals. For example, in the current difficult market environment, where customers are in need of raising additional equity capital in uncertain markets, we have begun to advise clients on the use of rights offerings, a technique that we developed and used extensively to help recapitalize the financial services industry in the early 1990s.

Our investment banking business is structured to serve three segments of the financial services industry: banks and thrifts, insurance, and diversified finance. Our focus is on small and mid cap companies, although we have increasingly provided services to large cap companies, reflecting the continuing growth of our long term clients and opportunities that have arisen as large cap companies have sought independent specialized advice. We seek to build lasting relationships with clients by providing a range of services through the many stages of their development. As these companies grow and mature, we attempt to sustain these relationships through equity and debt securities offerings, institutional sales and trading, and strategic advisory services. Many of these clients are also natural candidates for coverage by our research department. Our execution capabilities and range of service offerings enable us to continue serving these companies as they engage in more complex capital markets and strategic transactions. For example, we seek to deliver strong secondary market trading support, which we believe is a key differentiator with our investment banking clients.

M&A and Strategic Advisory Services. We provide a broad range of advice to our clients in relation to mergers, acquisitions and similar corporate finance matters and are positioned to be involved at each stage of these transactions, from initial structuring to final execution. We have consistently been among the top ranking M&A advisors for companies in the financial services industry. When we advise companies on the potential acquisition of another company or certain assets, our services may include:

	•		Evaluating potential acquisition targets,

	•		Providing valuation analyses,

	•		Evaluating and proposing financial and strategic alternatives,

	•		Rendering, if appropriate, fairness opinions,

	•		Providing advice regarding the timing, structure and pricing of a proposed acquisition, and

	•		Assisting in negotiating and closing the acquisition.

When we advise clients that are contemplating the sale of certain businesses, assets or their entire company, our services may include:

	•		Evaluating and recommending financial and strategic alternatives with respect to a sale,

	•		Advising on the appropriate sale process,

	•		Providing valuation analyses,

	•		Assisting in preparing an offering memorandum or other appropriate sales materials,

	•		Rendering, if appropriate, fairness opinions,

	•		Identifying and contacting selected qualified acquirors, and

	•		Assisting in negotiating and closing the proposed sale.

Our strategic advisory services also include more specialized advisory assignments, such as divestitures, hostile takeover defenses and special committee assignments. Fees for advisory services may be determined based on a flat fee, a fee based on the value of the transaction, or a fee for specified services blended with a fee based on the value of the transaction. It is common for portions of fees to be payable upon the occurrence of certain events, such as deal announcement, rendering of fairness opinions, mailing of proxy or other deal solicitation documents and closing. The majority of total fees are paid usually upon the successful completion of a transaction.

Capital Raising Services. Capital raising is especially important in the financial services industry, and we are one of the leading underwriters for financial services equity capital markets transactions. Many of our clients, such as banks, thrifts, brokerage firms and insurance companies operate under statutes or regulations that require the maintenance of certain capital levels in order to provide many of

their services. We act as underwriter and placement agent in both public and private offerings of equity and debt securities.

Capital raising requires the close coordination of our investment banking practice, our equity and fixed income capital markets departments and our equity and fixed income sales and trading departments. Our equity and fixed income capital markets departments assist the investment banking department in efforts to obtain capital markets investment banking mandates and also coordinate with syndicate departments of other investment banks in obtaining underwriting and co-manager roles. By coordinating these capital raising services, we introduce companies seeking to raise capital from customers that we believe will be supportive, long term investors. In addition, the ability to provide after market support as a leading market maker or significant trader of listed securities is a critical factor in receiving equity capital raising assignments.

We believe that, while our market share of financial services industry transactions is significant, there is still an opportunity for growth in this area. We are a leading NASDAQ market maker for the stocks of our issuers in the secondary market.

Sales and Trading

Equity Sales and Trading. Our institutional equity sales team serves customers out of our New York, London, Boston, Hartford, Atlanta and San Francisco offices. Unlike many of our larger, less specialized competitors, all of our sales representatives are specifically trained in the analysis of financial services companies. Our sales and trading team provides specialized services, including value-added, industry and sector-specific trading expertise, research and access to capital markets transactions. Through an extensive use of sector-focused presentations and transaction-related teach-ins we have emphasized educating our sales force as we have expanded our business model to include additional sectors of the financial services industry.

We have access to all major exchanges in the United States and Europe. Our U.S. equity trading team makes markets in over 800 Nasdaq and NYSE financial services stocks and consistently ranks among the top traders of financial services securities. As reported by AutEx/BlockDATA, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 we were one of the top three market makers in 36% of the stocks in the NASDAQ 100 Financial Index. We are the largest trader of bank stocks with a market capitalization below $5 billion. During this same twelve month period, we traded 9.9% of small cap bank stocks, with a trade volume in excess of 510 million shares. In overall reported trading volume in the NASDAQ 100 Financial Index companies during this period, we ranked seventh, with a market share of 4.6% or 769 million shares.

We maintain relationships with many of the world’s largest institutional investors including both domestic and international investment advisors, banks, mutual funds, hedge funds, pension funds and insurance companies.

Our equity sales group provides institutional customers with significant access to company managements and our research analysts. This is accomplished through our many industry focused conferences, roadshow access for capital markets transactions, and a combination of issuer management marketing days, including marketing trips, group meetings and field trips, combined with analyst marketing trips and “Best Ideas” presentations and our annual “Bruyette Dinners.”

We are an active participant in corporate repurchase programs for small, mid and large cap companies. We have also been willing to commit our capital to participate in “bought” deals and accelerated share repurchase programs.

Fixed Income Sales and Trading. Our fixed income group conducts sales and trading operations in New York City with sales branches in Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Hartford and San Francisco. We trade and underwrite a wide range of fixed income securities, including mortgage-backed securities, U.S. Treasury and Federal Agency securities, and a wide array of corporate bonds and preferred stock, including those issued by banks, insurance companies, REITs, and finance companies, including Trust Preferred Securities and PreTSLs™ and similar securities issued by competitors.

Our fixed income syndicate team works with the firm’s investment banking department to provide financing for M&A activity, balance sheet restructuring and capital raising. We support such financings with secondary trading.

Our financial balance sheet management group provides valuations and restructuring strategies for the full range of securities and loans, including those loans which are sub-performing, non-performing and charged-off.

Research

As of December 31, 2007, our research covered 569 domestic and international financial services companies such as bank and thrift holding companies, banks, thrifts, REITs, and specialty finance, insurance and securities firms and securities exchanges. Our research group follows nearly all of the financial services industry companies in the S&P 500 and Dow Jones STOXX 600 Index, as well as hundreds of other U.S. and European financial services companies on a daily basis. Our research provides the foundation for five widely followed domestic industry indices: the KBW Bank Index (BKX), the KBW Regional Banking Index (KRX), the KBW Insurance Index (KIX), the KBW Capital Markets Index (KSX), and the KBW Mortgage Finance Index (MFX). The indices are also used in widely traded Exchange Traded Funds and exchange traded options under licenses from us. In September 2007, our London based research team launched six European financial indices and a Global financial index. These include: the KBW European Large-Cap Banking Index (KEBI-Euros and KEBID-US Dollars); the KBW European Mid & Small-Cap Banking Index (KMBI-Euros and KMBID-US Dollars); the KBW European Large-Cap Insurance Index (KEII-Euros and KEIID-US Dollars); the KBW European Mid & Small-Cap Insurance Index (KMII-Euros and KMIID- US Dollars); the KBW Miscellaneous Financials Index (KMFI-Euros and KMFID-US Dollars); the KBW Emerging European Financials Index (KEEI-Euros and KEEID-US Dollars) and the KBW Global Financials Index (KGX-US Dollars).

In recent years we have significantly increased our research coverage. We believe that our effort is rewarded in enhancing our reputation and the value of our market franchise and in attracting increased commissions to our sales and trading efforts from customers seeking specialized research.

The expansion of our research coverage is an integral part of the expansion of our investment banking and sales activities. This model initially supported our growth in the banking industry, followed by our growth into insurance and diversified financials. It was an integral part of the development of our European operations. The most recent example of this strategy is the implementation of our presence in the equity REIT sector. Commencing in the spring of 2007 we moved from the coverage of mortgage REITs into equity REITs with the hiring of a highly respected senior analyst. Since that time, we have added two additional senior analysts and have grown to cover approximately 35 of the 132 public companies operating in this sector, representing nearly 30% of the market capitalization of these companies. We have already participated in public offerings conducted by several of these companies and are active in the sales and trading of securities issued by these companies. The investment banking group has assigned senior bankers to develop this area.

Our U.S. based research analysts covered the equity securities of 418 companies in the United States as of December 31, 2007. Our U.S. equity coverage as of December 31, 2007 is summarized in the following table:


	Number of
Sector	Companies
Regional Banks and Thrifts		178
Large Cap Banks and Thrifts		23
Trust and Custody		4


Total Depositary Financial Services Companies		205


Property Casualty Insurance		50
Equity REITs		35
Broker-Dealers		34
Life Insurance		22
Specialty Finance		21
Asset Managers		15
Insurance Other		15
Processing/Business Information		12
Mortgage REITs		9


Total Other Financial Services Companies		213


Total Companies under coverage		418

Our U.S. research team covers all segments of market capitalization across the financial services industry. The median market capitalization of companies covered in the United States is approximately $1.2 billion.

Our European research team covers 151 companies in diverse portions of the financial services sector predominantly in various countries in Europe and emerging markets. The group covers 77 banks, including 74 commercial banks and three investment banks; 49 insurance companies, including 36 European insurers, five reinsurance companies and eight integrated Lloyd’s of London market vehicles. The group also covers diversified financial companies including consumer finance companies, securities exchanges, private banks and asset managers.

Both our U.S. and European research teams produce a significant amount of analytical material, including daily notes, email and printed company reports, industry compilations, quarterly and annual outlooks and summary results and strategic “think” pieces. The research department supports our extensive sales and trading efforts by organizing and participating in an extensive client contact program, that includes sub-sector conferences, client-company marketing trips and direct access to analysts by investors. In addition, our numerous industry conferences put companies and investors together and provide valuable one-on-one contact with potential clients and customers who can observe the full strength of our investment banking, sales and trading and research capabilities in one forum.

Asset Management

KBW Asset Management, Inc. (“KBWAM”) is a registered investment adviser focused on investments in the securities of financial services companies. We are the advisor to two hedge funds and a private equity fund. We also serve as a discretionary sub advisor for a fund managed by an unaffiliated

third party. As of December 31, 2007, KBWAM had approximately $104.7 million in assets under management and committed capital for unaffiliated customers.

Employees

As of December 31, 2007, we had 529 employees. None of our employees are represented by any collective bargaining agreements. We have not experienced any work stoppages and believe that our relationship with our employees is good.

Competition

All areas of our business are subject to a high level of competition. Our competitors are other investment banks, brokerage firms, merchant banks and financial advisory firms. Our focus on the financial services industry also subjects us to direct competition from a number of specialty securities firms and smaller investment banking boutiques that specialize in providing services to the financial services industry.

The principal competitive factors influencing our business include the ability of our professionals, industry expertise, client relationships, business reputation, market focus and product capabilities and quality and price of our products and services.

We face a high level of competition in recruiting and retaining experienced and qualified professionals. The success of our business and our ability to continue to compete effectively will depend significantly upon our continued ability to retain and incentivize our existing professionals and attract new professionals.

Many of our competitors have substantially greater capital and resources than we do and offer a broader range of financial products and services. The scale of our competitors has increased in recent years as a result of substantial consolidation among companies in the securities and investment banking industries. In addition, a number of large commercial banks, insurance companies and other broad-based financial services firms have established or acquired underwriting or financial advisory businesses and broker-dealers or have merged with other financial institutions. These firms have the ability to offer a wider range of products than we do, which may enhance their competitive position. They also have the ability to support investment banking with commercial banking, insurance and other financial services in an effort to gain market share, which has resulted, and could further result, in pricing pressure in our businesses. In particular, the ability to provide financing has become an important advantage for some of our larger competitors and, because we do not provide such financing, we may be unable to compete as effectively for clients in a significant part of the investment banking market.

We have experienced intense price competition in some of our businesses, in particular discounts in trading commissions. A particular source of this pricing pressure has been Internet-based and other alternative trading platforms, the expansion of which has led to a reduction of trading commissions. We believe that this trend toward alternative trading systems will continue. In addition, the trend, particularly in the equity underwriting business, toward multiple book runners and co-managers has increased the competitive pressure in the investment banking industry, and may lead to lower average transaction fees. We may experience competitive pressures in these and other areas in the future as some of our competitors seek to increase market share by reducing prices.

As we seek to expand our asset management business, we face competition in the pursuit of investors for our investment funds, in the identification and completion of investments in attractive portfolio companies and in the recruitment and retention of asset management professionals.

Regulation

Our business, as well as the financial services industry generally, is subject to extensive regulation in the United States and elsewhere. As a matter of public policy, regulatory bodies in the United States and the rest of the world are charged with safeguarding the integrity of the securities and other financial markets and with protecting the interests of customers participating in those markets. In the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) is the federal agency responsible for the administration of the federal securities laws. Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. (“Keefe”), our wholly owned subsidiary, is registered as a broker-dealer with the SEC and in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. Accordingly, Keefe is subject to regulation and oversight by the SEC and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), a self-regulatory organization which is subject to oversight by the SEC and adopts, and enforces rules governing the conduct, and examines the activities, of their member firms. State securities regulators also have regulatory or oversight authority over Keefe. FINRA was created in July 2007 through the consolidation of the NASD and the member regulation, enforcement and arbitration functions of the New York Stock Exchange. Pending adoption of a single regulatory scheme, FINRA continues to enforce the rules of both the NASD and NYSE and utilize separate examination and enforcement structures. Because of its status prior to the creation of FINRA as a regulatory member of the New York Stock Exchange and member of the NASD, Keefe is subject to both sets of regulation and examination by FINRA. Keefe, Bruyette & Woods Limited, our U.K. broker-dealer subsidiary, is authorized and regulated by the U.K. Financial Services Authority. Our business may also be subject to regulation by non-U.S. governmental and regulatory bodies and self-regulatory authorities in other countries where we operate.

Broker-dealers are subject to regulations that cover all aspects of the securities business, including sales methods, trade practices among broker-dealers, use and safekeeping of customers’ funds and securities, capital structure, record-keeping, the financing of customers’ purchases and the conduct and qualifications of directors, officers and employees. In particular, as a registered broker-dealer and member of various self-regulatory organizations, Keefe is subject to the SEC’s uniform net capital rule, Rule 15c3-1. Rule 15c3-1 specifies the minimum level of net capital a broker-dealer must maintain and also requires that a significant part of a broker-dealer’s assets be kept in relatively liquid form. The SEC and various self-regulatory organizations impose rules that require notification when net capital falls below certain predefined criteria, limit the ratio of subordinated debt to equity in the regulatory capital composition of a broker-dealer and constrain the ability of a broker-dealer to expand its business under certain circumstances. Additionally, the SEC’s uniform net capital rule imposes certain requirements that may have the effect of prohibiting a broker-dealer from distributing or withdrawing capital and requiring prior notice to the FINRA for certain withdrawals of capital. There are also financial resources requirements of the Financial Services Authority in the United Kingdom that apply to Keefe, Bruyette & Woods Limited.

The research areas of investment banks have been and remain the subject of regulatory scrutiny. The SEC, NYSE and NASD (now adopted by FINRA) have adopted rules imposing restrictions on the interaction between equity research analysts and investment banking personnel at member securities firms. Various non-U.S. jurisdictions have imposed both substantive and disclosure-based requirements with respect to research, and continue to consider additional regulation.

The effort to combat money laundering and terrorist financing is a priority in governmental policy with respect to financial institutions. The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 contains anti-money laundering and financial transparency laws and mandates the implementation of various new regulations applicable to broker-dealers and other financial services companies, including requirements to maintain an anti-money laundering compliance program that includes written policies and procedures, designated compliance officer(s), appropriate training and independent review of the program, standards for verifying client identification at account opening, and obligations to monitor client transactions and report suspicious activities.

Through these and other provisions, the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 seeks to promote the identification of parties that may be involved in terrorism or money laundering. Anti-money laundering laws outside the United States contain some similar provisions. The obligation of financial institutions, including ourselves, to identify their customers, watch for and report suspicious transactions, respond to requests for information by regulatory authorities and law enforcement agencies, and share information with other financial institutions, has required the implementation and maintenance of internal practices, procedures and controls which have increased, and may continue to increase, our costs, and any failure with respect to our programs in this area could subject us to serious regulatory consequences, including substantial fines, and potentially other liabilities.

Certain of our businesses are subject to compliance with laws and regulations of U.S. federal and state governments, non-U.S. governments, their respective agencies and/or various self-regulatory organizations or exchanges relating to the privacy of client information, and any failure to comply with these regulations could expose us to liability and/or reputational damage.

Additional legislation, changes in rules promulgated by the SEC and self-regulatory organizations or changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and rules, either in the United States or elsewhere, may directly affect the mode of our operation and profitability.

U.S. and non-U.S. government agencies and self-regulatory organizations, as well as state securities commissions in the United States, are empowered to conduct administrative proceedings that can result in censure, fine, the issuance of cease-and-desist orders or the suspension or expulsion of a broker-dealer or its directors, officers or employees. Occasionally, we have been subject to investigations and proceedings. We have not had any significant sanctions imposed for infractions of various regulations relating to our activities.

Available Information

We are required to file current, annual and quarterly reports, proxy statements and other information required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), with the SEC. You may read and copy any document we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an internet website at http://www.sec.gov, from which interested persons can electronically access our SEC filings.

We will make available free of charge through our internet site http://www.kbw.com, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements, Forms 3, 4 and 5 filed by or on behalf of directors, executive officers and certain large stockholders, and any amendments to those documents filed or furnished pursuant to the Exchange Act. These filings will become available as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.

We also make available, on the Investor Relations page of our website, our (i) Corporate Governance Guidelines, (ii) Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, (iii) Supplement to Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers and (iv) the charters of the Audit, Compensation, and Corporate Governance and Nominations Committees of our Board of Directors. You will need to have Adobe Acrobat Reader software installed on your computer to view these documents,

which are in the PDF format. These documents will also be available in print without charge to any person who requests them by writing or telephoning: KBW, Inc., Office of the General Counsel, 787 Seventh Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, New York, 10019, U.S.A., telephone number (212) 887-7777.

Executive Officers

Our executive officers and their ages and titles as of December 31, 2007 are set forth below.

John G. Duffy (58). Mr. Duffy has been Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and a director of KBW, Inc. since its formation in August 2005. He joined us in 1978 as manager of our Bank Watch Department evaluating credit ratings for financial institutions nationwide. He became a director of Keefe Bruyette & Woods, Inc., our wholly-owned registered broker-dealer subsidiary (“Keefe”), in 1990, was named its Co-CEO and President in 1999 and its Chairman and CEO in 2001. Prior to that, Mr. Duffy was Executive Vice President in charge of Keefe’s Corporate Finance Department. He is a graduate of the City College of New York. Mr. Duffy serves on the Board of Trustees of the Michael Smurfit Graduate School of Business, University College in Dublin, Ireland, as well as St. Michael’s College in Colchester, Vermont, and The Ursuline School in New Rochelle, New York. He is also Chairman of the Investment Committee of the Cardinal and Gold Fund of Cardinal Hayes High School in Bronx, New York and a director of the American Ireland Fund. He also serves on the Advisory Council of the Weissman Center for International Business at Baruch College.

Andrew M. Senchak (61). Mr. Senchak has been President, Vice Chairman and a director of KBW, Inc. since its formation in August 2005. He has been with our Investment Banking Department since 1985. In 1997 he became a director of Keefe as well as head of the Investment Banking Department, and was elected its Vice Chairman and its President in 2001. Mr. Senchak stepped down as President of Keefe in 2006. Prior to joining the firm Mr. Senchak taught Economics at Rutgers University and spent two and a half years in Brazil with the Peace Corps. He received a B.A. in Liberal Arts from Lafayette College and earned a Ph.D. in Economics from Columbia University. Mr. Senchak is a member of the Board of Trustees of Newark Academy in Livingston, N.J., the National September 11 Memorial and Museum at the World Trade Center, the KBW Family Fund and the MacDowell Colony. He is also on the board of WeatherWise USA, Inc.

Thomas B. Michaud (43). Mr. Michaud has been Chief Operating Officer, Vice Chairman and a director of KBW, Inc. since its formation in August 2005. Mr. Michaud’s primary responsibilities with the firm are to oversee our sales and trading businesses. He began his career with us in 1986 as a credit trainee in the Bank Watch Department and transferred to the Research Department before joining our Equity Sales Team in 1988. He was named Director of Equity Sales and Executive Vice President in 1999. He became a director of Keefe in 1999 and its Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer in 2001. He was elected President of Keefe in 2006. Mr. Michaud is a graduate of Middlebury College and earned an M.B.A. from the Stern School of Business at New York University. From 1994 until 2001 he was an elected member of the Representative Town Meeting of the Town of Greenwich, Connecticut. The Representative Town Meeting is the legislative body for the Town of Greenwich. He also serves on the Board of Directors of the Greenwich Chapter of the American Red Cross.

Robert Giambrone (53). Mr. Giambrone has served as our Chief Financial and Administrative Officer since 2002. Prior to joining us, Mr. Giambrone was an Executive Director of the Asset Management Division of Morgan Stanley from 1995 to 2002. Mr. Giambrone was a director of KBW, Inc. from April 2006 until completion of its IPO in November 2006.

Mitchell B. Kleinman (54). Mr. Kleinman has served as General Counsel of KBW, Inc. since its formation in August 2005. Mr. Kleinman has served as General Counsel to Keefe since 1998. Prior to

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Risks Related to Our Business

Difficult market conditions generally, and in the financial services industry specifically, could adversely affect our business in many ways.

We focus on the financial services industry. Volatility in the business environment in the financial services industry generally, or in the market for securities of companies within the financial services industry particularly, could substantially affect our financial results and the market value of our common stock. The financial services industry is comprised of numerous sectors, each of which may also be subject to sector-specific risks. Many companies in the financial services industry are subject to significant regulatory oversight and changes in laws, regulations or applicable regulatory agency policies or procedures. These may have a material impact on certain portions of our industry. Underwriting transactions, M&A and strategic advisory engagements and related sales and trading activities in this industry represent the principal focus of our business. This concentration exposes us to the risk of substantial declines in revenues in the event of downturns in the financial services industry.

During 2007, credit markets were materially negatively impacted, initially by the impact of dramatic increases in mortgage delinquencies and defaults in 2007 and anticipated future delinquencies among high-risk, or subprime, borrowers in the United States. This deterioration of credit quality had a widespread impact as a result of the extensive distribution of securities collateralized by such credits. The market for such securities further deteriorated due to the inability of traditional buyers of such securities to obtain funds through the issuance of commercial paper or other short-term unsecured sources. As prices declined and delinquencies increased, investors lost confidence in the rating system for structured products as rating agencies moved to downgrade primarily sub-prime mortgage backed collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”) and other structured products. In addition, investors lost confidence in commercial paper conduits and structured investment vehicles (“SIVs”) causing concerns over large potential liquidations of AAA collateral. Price declines were further driven by forced sales of assets in order to meet demands by investors for the return of their collateral and collateral calls by lenders.

Many banks and institutional investors have also recognized substantial losses as they revalue their CDOs and other mortgage-related assets downward. During the second half of 2007, the economic impact of these problems spread on a global basis and disrupted the broader financial markets. The combination of these events caused a large number of mortgage lenders and some hedge funds to shut down or file for bankruptcy. The deterioration and recognition of substantial exposure through derivatives and policies written by monoline insurers resulted in the downgrade of certain of these monoline insurers. Several of these monoline insurers also reported significant losses. Further downgrades of these monoline insurers or their failure could result in additional significant write-downs at many financial institutions and could have a material adverse effect on the broader financial markets. Financial institutions have entered into large numbers of credit default swaps with counterparties to hedge credit risk. As a result of the global credit crises and the increasingly large numbers of credit defaults, there is a risk that counterparties could fail, shut down, file for bankruptcy or be unable to pay out contracts. The failure of a significant number of counterparties or a counterparty that holds a significant amount of credit default swaps could have a material adverse effect on the broader financial markets. It is difficult to predict how long these conditions will continue, whether they will continue to deteriorate and which of our markets, products and businesses will continue to be adversely affected.

Although we did not engage directly in many of the business activities which have been responsible for the current pressures on the economy and markets, such as investing in subprime backed securities, many of the companies for whom we perform services or in which we make markets or invest have engaged in and been directly affected by these activities.

It is not possible to currently predict the future impact of this continuing market uncertainty. As a result, these conditions could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We are an underwriter and market-maker for pooled trust preferred securities and similar securities issued by financial institutions in our PreTSL™ product. We also purchase certain trust preferred or other capital securities primarily issued by banks and insurance companies that may qualify for inclusion in future such pools and finance a portion of the purchase price of such securities. We also seek to make markets in tranches of similar pooled trust preferred securities issued by other parties. In the present market environment, the markets for these instruments have become substantially more illiquid and as a result, the valuation of such securities held for inclusion in future pools or held in our secondary market trading inventory is complex and involves a comprehensive process, including, in the case of certain securities or tranches of pooled securities, the use of quantitative modeling and management judgment. This is reflected in the increase in assets classified as Level 3 during the fourth quarter of 2007. Valuation of these exposures will also continue to be impacted by external market factors, including issuer specific credit deteriorations and deferral and default rates, rating agency actions, and the prices at which observable market transactions occur. Our ability to mitigate our exposures by selling or hedging our exposures is also limited by the market environment. Our future results may continue to be impacted by the valuation adjustments that we apply to our portfolio of these securities. For a further discussion regarding the measure of financial instruments owned see note 3, “Financial Instruments,” to our consolidated financial statements.

Our investment banking revenues, in the form of financial advisory and debt and equity underwriting fees, are directly related to the number and size of the transactions in which we participate. Continued market pressures may have a negative impact on advisory fees from mergers and acquisitions, as a result of uncertainties in valuations related to potential future asset quality and creditworthiness of both targets and acquirers and limitations on access to capital markets to finance such activities. In addition these uncertainties may limit the capital markets activities of certain companies or sub-sectors of the financial services industry. This may be further impacted by continued or further credit market dislocations or sustained market downturns.

During periods of market volatility, such as the current period, profitability of market making and similar trading activities may be negatively affected. In addition, as the markets for certain privately placed securities become more illiquid, we may be forced to retain securities inventory for longer periods and be subjected to the related market and credit risks. While generally periods of volatility are marked by increases in trading volume, leading to higher commissions, a decrease in volume could lead to a reduction in such commissions.

With respect to our asset management business, because the fees that we charge for managing our clients’ portfolios are usually based on the value of those portfolios, a market downturn that reduces the value of our clients’ portfolios or increases the amount of withdrawals would reduce the revenue we receive from our asset management business.

Our risk management policies and procedures may leave us exposed to unidentified or unanticipated risks.

Our risk management strategies and techniques may not be fully effective in mitigating our risk exposure in all market environments or against all types of risk. We are exposed to the risk that third parties that owe us money, securities or other assets will not perform their obligations. These parties may default on their obligations to us due to bankruptcy, lack of liquidity, operational failure, breach of

contract or other reasons. We are also subject to the risk that our rights against third parties may not be enforceable in all circumstances. As an introducing broker to clearing firms, we are responsible to the clearing firm and could be held responsible for the defaults or misconduct of our customers. Although we review credit exposures to specific clients, customers and counterparties and to specific industries and regions that we believe may present credit concerns, default risk may arise from events or circumstances that are difficult to detect or foresee. In addition, concerns about, or a default by, one institution could lead to significant liquidity problems, losses or defaults by other institutions, which in turn could adversely affect us. In addition to our credit risks described above, we are subject to various market, interest rate, inflation and operational risks, including those described under “—Difficult market conditions generally, and in the financial services industry specifically, could adversely affect our business in many ways,” “— Our operations and infrastructure may malfunction or fail,” “— Committing our own capital in our underwriting, trading and other businesses increases the potential for significant losses,” and “— We may be adversely affected by changes in services and products provided by third parties and increases in related costs.” While we attempt to mitigate these risks through our risk management policies, if any of the variety of instruments, processes and strategies we utilize to manage our exposure to various types of risk are not effective, we may incur significant losses. See Item 7A — “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risks.”

Committing our own capital in our underwriting, trading and other businesses increases the potential for significant losses.

The growing practice in capital markets is toward larger and more frequent commitments of capital by financial services firms in many of their activities. For example, in order to win business, investment banks are increasingly committing, with little or no advance marketing, to “bought deals” where they purchase large blocks of stock from publicly-traded issuers or their significant stockholders, instead of the more traditional marketed “book building” underwriting process, in which marketing is typically completed before an investment bank commits to purchase securities for resale. We have participated in this practice and expect to continue to do so from time to time as opportunities may arise, aided in part by the increased capital provided by our initial public offering. Furthermore, we may suffer losses even when economic and market conditions are generally favorable for others in the industry.

We also enter into market making, proprietary trading and principal investing transactions in which we commit our capital. The number and size of these transactions may materially affect our results of operations in a given period. We may also incur significant losses from our trading activities due to market fluctuations and volatility from quarter to quarter. We maintain trading positions in the fixed income and equity markets to facilitate client trading activities and engage in proprietary trading for our own account. To the extent that we own assets, i.e., have long positions, in any of those markets, a downturn in the value of those assets or in those markets could result in losses from a decline in the value of those long positions. Conversely, to the extent that we have sold assets we do not own, i.e., have short positions, in any of those markets, an upturn in those markets could expose us to potentially unlimited losses as we attempt to cover our short positions by acquiring assets in a rising market.

As a result, we will be subject to increased risk as we commit greater amounts of capital to the extent we expand our proprietary trading and principal investing activities or commit additional capital to facilitate primarily client-driven business.

Our ability to retain our professionals is critical to the success of our business, and our failure to do so may materially adversely affect our reputation, business and results of operations.

Our ability to obtain and successfully execute the business mandates that generate a significant portion of our revenues depends upon the personal reputation, judgment, business generation capabilities

and project execution skills of our professionals. Although we do not believe that any one or small number of professionals are critical to our business, our business model is based on the building of long term relationships and our professionals’ personal reputations and relationships with our clients and customers are a critical element in obtaining and executing our engagements. The investment banking sector is subject to high employee turnover generally. We encounter intense competition for qualified employees from other companies in the investment banking sector as well as from businesses outside the investment banking industry, such as hedge funds, private equity funds and venture capital funds. From time to time, we have experienced losses of investment banking, sales and trading, research and other professionals. Losses of our professionals may occur in the future. The departure or other loss of any professional who manages substantial client or customer relationships and possesses substantial experience and expertise could impair our ability to secure or successfully complete engagements, which could materially adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We face strong competition, including from entities with significantly more financial and other resources.

The brokerage and investment banking industries are intensely competitive, and we expect them to remain so. We compete on the basis of a number of factors, including the ability of our professionals, industry expertise, client relationships, business reputation, market focus and quality and price of our products and services. We have experienced intense price competition in some of our businesses, in particular trading commissions and underwriting spreads. In addition, pricing and other competitive pressures in investment banking, including the trends toward multiple book-runners, co-managers and multiple financial advisors handling transactions, have continued and could adversely affect our revenues, even as transaction volume has increased in the U.S. market this year. We believe we may experience competitive pressures in these and other areas in the future as some of our competitors seek to obtain market share by competing on the basis of price.

Our geographic diversity requires us to compete with regional firms with strong localized relationships as well as other national and European specialized firms with financial industry focuses. In addition, we have faced increasing competition from large full-service firms as the scope of our practice has grown and as such firms have sought revenues from our traditional client base. We are a relatively small investment bank, and many of our competitors in the brokerage and investment banking industries offer a broader range of products and services, have greater financial and marketing resources, larger customer bases, greater name recognition, larger numbers of senior professionals to serve their clients’ needs and greater global coverage than we have. These competitors may be better able to respond to changes in the brokerage and investment banking industries, to compete for skilled professionals, to finance acquisitions, to fund internal growth, to commit significant capital to clients’ needs, to access additional capital under more advantageous conditions and to compete for market share generally.

The scale of our competitors has increased in recent years as a result of substantial consolidation among companies in the brokerage and investment banking industries. In addition, a number of large commercial banks, insurance companies and other broad-based financial services firms have established or acquired underwriting or financial advisory practices and broker-dealers or have merged with other financial institutions. These firms have the ability to offer a wider range of products than we do, which may enhance their competitive position. They also have the ability to support investment banking with commercial banking, insurance and other financial services in an effort to gain market share, which has resulted, and could further result, in pricing pressure in our businesses. In particular, the ability to provide financing has become an important advantage for some of our larger competitors and, because we do not provide such financing, we may be unable to compete as effectively for clients in a significant part of the

brokerage and investment banking market. If we are unable to compete effectively with our competitors, our business, financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected.

Pricing and other competitive pressures may impair the revenues and profitability of our sales and trading business.

We derive a significant portion of our revenues from our sales and trading business. Commissions accounted for approximately 38.8%, 28.7% and 31.3%, respectively, of our revenues in 2007, 2006 and 2005. Along with other securities firms, we have experienced intense price competition in this business in recent years. In particular, the ability to execute trades electronically, through the Internet and through other alternative trading systems, has increased the pressure on trading commissions and spreads. We expect this trend toward alternative trading systems and pricing pressures in this business to continue. The introduction of decimalization in securities trading since 2000 has also reduced revenues and lowered margins within the equity sales and trading securities divisions of many securities firms, including ours. We believe we may experience competitive pressures in these and other areas in the future as some of our competitors seek to obtain market share by competing on the basis of price. In addition, we face pressure from our larger competitors, which may be better able to offer a broader range of complementary products and services to customers in order to win their trading business. If we are unable to compete effectively with our competitors in these areas, the revenues and profitability of our securities business may decline and our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.

As we are committed to maintaining and improving our comprehensive research coverage in the financial services sector to support our sales and trading business, we may be required to make substantial investments in our research capabilities. In addition to other factors that may adversely affect our results of operations in this area, such as the legal and regulatory factors described under “— Risks Related to Our Industry,” certain recent changes in industry practice are likely to affect our sales and trading business. A developing trend has been for certain fund managers to enter into arrangements with securities firms under which the fund managers agree to pay separately for trading and research services, a process known as “unbundling.” Previously, fund managers, like most customers, paid for research through the commissions that they paid for trading services. As a result of unbundling, securities firms charge lower commissions per trade but receive separate compensation for research that they provide to the fund managers.

We are a party to several unbundling arrangements, and are likely to enter into additional unbundling arrangements in the future. It is uncertain whether unbundling arrangements will become an industry trend, and if so, to what extent. If unbundling becomes prevalent, our sales and trading customers may not pay us separately for our research, and if they do, our revenues from these customers may not be the same as they are currently. If our customers wish to purchase sales and trading and research services separately, we may not be able to market our services on that basis as effectively as some of our competitors, in which case our business could be adversely affected.

Our capital markets and strategic advisory engagements are singular in nature and do not generally provide for subsequent engagements.

Our investment banking clients generally retain us on a short-term, engagement-by-engagement basis in connection with specific capital markets or M&A transactions, rather than on a recurring basis under long-term contracts. Our business model is based on creating long-term relationships that we hope will lead to repeat business opportunities. However, our engagements for these transactions are typically singular in nature and our engagements with these clients may not recur. We must seek out new engagements when our current engagements are successfully completed or are terminated. As a result, high activity levels in any period are not necessarily indicative of continued high levels of activity in any

subsequent period. If we are unable to generate a substantial number of new engagements that generate fees from the successful completion of transactions, our business and results of operations would likely be adversely affected.

A significant portion of our sales commissions are generated from a relatively small number of institutional customers.

A relatively small number of our institutional investor customers generates a substantial portion of our sales commissions. If any of our key customers departs or reduces its business with us and we fail to attract new customers that are capable of generating significant trading volumes, our business and results of operations will be adversely affected.

Limitations on our access to funding could impair our liquidity and our ability to conduct our businesses.

Liquidity, or ready access to funds, is essential to financial services firms. Failures of financial institutions have often been attributable in large part to insufficient liquidity. Liquidity is of particular importance to our trading business, and perceived liquidity issues may affect our customers and counterparties’ willingness to engage in brokerage transactions with us. Our liquidity could be impaired because of circumstances that we may be unable to control, such as operating losses, a general market disruption or an operational problem that affects our trading customers, third parties or us. Further, our ability to sell assets may be impaired if other market participants are seeking to sell similar assets at the same time.

Lack of adequate funding would also limit our ability to pay dividends, repay debt and redeem or repurchase shares of our outstanding capital stock. Historically, we have satisfied our need for funding from internally generated funds, sales of shares of our common stock to our employees and to the public in our initial public offering and short term loans from third parties. While we currently have adequate capital, adequate funding may not continue to be available to us in the future on terms that are acceptable to us or at all. See Item 7 — “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

We have made and may continue to make principal investments in private equity funds and other illiquid investments, which are typically private limited partnership interests and securities that are not publicly traded. There is a significant risk that we may be unable to realize our investment objectives by sale or other disposition at attractive prices or that we may otherwise be unable to complete any exit strategy. In particular, these risks could arise from changes in the financial condition or prospects of the portfolio companies in which investments are made, changes in national or international economic conditions or changes in laws, regulations, fiscal policies or political conditions of countries in which investments are made. It takes a substantial period of time to identify attractive investment opportunities and then to realize the cash value of such investments through resale. Even if a private equity investment proves to be profitable, it may be several years or longer before any profits can be realized in cash.

Keefe, our U.S. broker-dealer subsidiary, is subject to the net capital requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, and various self-regulatory organizations of which it is a member. These requirements typically specify the minimum level of net capital a broker-dealer must maintain and also mandate that a significant part of its assets be kept in relatively liquid form. Any failure to comply with these net capital requirements could impair our ability to conduct our core business as a brokerage firm. There are similar financial resources of the Financial Services Authority in the United Kingdom related to the activities of Keefe, Bruyette & Woods Limited. Furthermore, the U.S. and U.K. broker dealer subsidiaries are subject to laws that authorize regulatory bodies to block or reduce the flow of funds from them to our company.

As a holding company, we may require dividends, distributions and other payments from our subsidiaries to fund payments on our obligations, including debt obligations. As a result, regulatory actions could impede access to funds that we need to make payments on obligations or dividend payments. In addition, because we hold equity interests in our subsidiaries, our rights as an equity holder to the assets of these subsidiaries are subordinated to any claims of the creditors of these subsidiaries.

Our operations and infrastructure may malfunction or fail.

Our businesses are highly dependent on our ability to process, on a daily basis, a large number of transactions across diverse markets, and the transactions we process have become increasingly complex. Our financial, accounting or other data processing systems may fail to operate properly or become disabled as a result of events that are wholly or partially beyond our control, including a disruption of electrical or communications services or our inability to occupy one or more of our buildings. The inability of our systems to accommodate an increasing volume of transactions could also constrain our ability to expand our businesses. We are also dependent on the systems and operations of our clearing brokers in the United States and the United Kingdom. If any of our systems or the systems of clearing brokers do not operate properly or are disabled or if there are other shortcomings or failures in our or their internal processes, people or systems, we could suffer impairment to our liquidity, financial loss, a disruption of our businesses, liability to clients, regulatory intervention or reputational damage.

We also face the risk of operational failure or termination of any of the clearing agents, exchanges, clearing houses or other financial intermediaries we use to facilitate our securities transactions. Any such failure or termination could adversely affect our ability to effect transactions and to manage our exposure to risk.

In addition, our ability to conduct business may be adversely impacted by a disruption in the infrastructure that supports our businesses and the communities in which we are located. This may include a disruption involving electrical, communications, transportation or other services used by us or third parties with or through whom we conduct business, whether due to fire, other natural disaster, power or communications failure, act of terrorism or war or otherwise. Nearly all of our employees in our primary locations work in close proximity to each other. If a disruption occurs in one location and our employees in that location are unable to communicate with or travel to other locations, our ability to service and interact with our clients and customers may suffer and we may not be able to implement successfully contingency plans that depend on communication or travel.

Our operations also rely on the secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential and other information in our computer systems and networks. Although we take protective measures and endeavor to modify them as circumstances warrant, our computer systems, software and networks may be vulnerable to unauthorized access, computer viruses or other malicious events that could have a security impact. If one or more of such events occur, this could jeopardize confidential and other information of us or our clients, customers or counterparties that is processed and stored in, and transmitted through, our computer systems and networks. Furthermore, such events could cause interruptions or malfunctions in our operations or those of our clients, customers, counterparties or other third parties. We may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify our protective measures or to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures, and we may be subject to litigation and financial losses that are either not insured against or not fully covered through any insurance maintained by us.

We may be adversely affected by changes in services and products provided by third parties and increases in related costs.

Many of our sales, trading and information systems are provided pursuant to agreements with third party vendors. Although we seek to negotiate agreements with these vendors to obtain such services on reasonable terms, we cannot always negotiate terms which will provide us such services for terms or at prices that are not subject to significant change. The process of changing to competing services or products can be time consuming, costly and subject to implementation and operational risks. In certain cases replacement products or services may not be available and we may be forced to accept significant cost increases or seek alternatives that do not provide substantially identical functionality.

Our financial results may fluctuate substantially from period to period, which may impair our stock price.

We have experienced, and expect to experience in the future, significant periodic variations in our investment banking revenues. These variations may be attributed in part to the fact that our investment banking revenues are typically earned upon the successful completion of a transaction, the timing of which is uncertain and beyond our control. In most cases we receive little or no payment for investment banking engagements that do not result in the successful completion of a transaction. As a result, our business is highly dependent on market conditions as well as the decisions and actions of our clients and interested third parties. For example, a client’s acquisition transaction may be delayed or terminated because of a failure to agree upon final terms with the counterparty, failure to obtain necessary regulatory consents or approval, or board of director or stockholder approvals, failure to secure necessary financing, adverse market conditions or unexpected financial or other problems in the client’s or counterparty’s business. If the parties fail to complete a transaction on which we are advising or an offering in which we are participating, we will earn little or no revenue from the transaction. As a result, we are unlikely to achieve steady and predictable earnings on a quarterly basis, which could in turn adversely affect our stock price.

Poor investment performance may reduce revenues and profitability of our asset management operations.

As part of our strategy, we intend to pursue additional areas of growth in our asset management business. Our revenues from this business are primarily derived from management fees which are based on committed capital and/or assets under management and incentive fees, which are earned if the return of our managed accounts exceeds certain threshold returns. Our ability to maintain or increase assets under management is subject to a number of factors, including investors’ perception of our past performance, market or economic conditions, competition from other fund managers and our ability to negotiate terms with major investors.

Investment performance is one of the most important factors in retaining existing investors and competing for new asset management business. Poor investment performance could reduce our revenues and impair our growth. Even when market conditions are generally favorable, our investment performance may be adversely affected by our investment style and the particular investments that we make. To the extent our future investment performance is perceived to be poor in either relative or absolute terms, the revenues and profitability of our asset management business will likely be reduced and our ability to raise new funds will likely be impaired.

Strategic investments, acquisitions, entry into new businesses and joint ventures may result in additional risks and uncertainties in our business.

We intend to grow our core businesses primarily through internal expansion. We may also seek to grow through strategic investments, acquisitions, entry into new businesses or joint ventures. To the extent we make strategic investments or acquisitions, or enter into new businesses or joint ventures, we would face numerous risks and uncertainties combining or integrating the relevant businesses and systems, including the need to combine accounting and data processing systems and management controls and to integrate relationships with customers and business partners. In the case of joint ventures, we would be subject to additional risks and uncertainties in that we could be dependent upon, and subject to liability, losses or reputational damage relating to, systems, controls and personnel that are not under our control. In addition, conflicts or disagreements between us and any joint venture partners could negatively impact our businesses. We may also face conflicts to the extent that we sponsor the development of other business and commit to provide personnel, capital or benefits from our business relationships to such other businesses.

In December 2007, FIG Acquisition Corp. (“FIG”), with KBW as a sponsor, filed a registration statement for an initial public offering. FIG is a special purpose acquisition company, or SPAC, which will seek a business combination with a financial services company. Employees of KBW will act as senior officers or directors of this company and certain employees are also investors in this company. Although it is not anticipated that any such employees will devote a material portion of their work time to the SPAC, this structure may lead to conflicts which may require us to forego certain business opportunities and related revenues, such as advisory fees for companies which may be purchased by the SPAC.

To the extent we enter into new business activities in the future, these will involve significant start up costs and operational and staffing challenges. In addition, these activities may use a portion of the time of members of our management which would then be unavailable for the management of our existing businesses. Certain possible future business activities may require us to raise significant amounts of capital or to obtain other lending sources which efforts may be subject to market conditions at the time. To the extent we undertake new activities, they may not be successful and any investments we make in these new activities may not retain their value or achieve positive returns.

To the extent that we pursue business opportunities outside the United States, we will be subject to political, economic, legal, operational and other risks that are inherent in operating in a foreign country, including risks of possible nationalization, expropriation, price controls, capital controls, exchange controls and other restrictive governmental actions, as well as the outbreak of hostilities. In many countries, the laws and regulations applicable to the securities and financial services industries are uncertain and evolving, and it may be difficult for us to determine the exact requirements of local laws in every market. Our inability to remain in compliance with local laws in a particular foreign market could have a significant and negative effect not only on our businesses in that market but also on our reputation generally. We are also subject to the enhanced risk that transactions we structure might not be legally enforceable in the relevant jurisdictions.

Growth of our business could result in increased costs.

Over the past several years, we have experienced significant growth in our business activities, including launching European-focused operations and opening a London office. This growth has required and will continue to require increased investment in management personnel, financial and management systems and controls and facilities, which, in the absence of continued revenue growth, would cause our operating margins to decline from current levels. As we have grown and continue to grow, the need for

additional compliance, documentation and risk management procedures and internal controls has increased throughout our business. Implementation of these changes will require the incurrence of additional expenses, including the hiring of additional personnel and the adoption of new compliance procedures and controls. The implementation of such additional policies and procedures may not prevent us from experiencing a material loss or other liability, including regulatory sanction.

In addition, we may incur significant expenses in connection with any expansion of our investment banking, sales and trading, research and asset management businesses or in connection with any strategic acquisitions and investments, if and to the extent they arise from time to time. If our revenues do not increase sufficiently, or even if our revenues increase but we are unable to manage our expenses, we will not achieve and maintain profitability in future periods.

Investments by our directors, officers, employees and our employee profit sharing retirement plan may conflict with the interests of our stockholders.

Our executive officers, directors and employees and our employee profit sharing retirement plan may from time to time invest in or receive a profit interest in private or public companies in which we or one of our affiliates is an investor or for which we provide investment banking services, publish research or act as a market maker. In addition, through KBW Asset Management, we have organized hedge funds or similar investment vehicles in which our employees are or may become investors and we expect to continue to do so in the future, including investments in FIG. There is a risk that, as a result of such investment or profit interest, a director, officer or employee may take actions that conflict with the best interests of our stockholders.

Our tax-qualified employee profit sharing retirement plan offers employees the opportunity to choose among a number of investment alternatives. One of these, the KBW Fund, has been managed by certain employees and has invested in securities in which we and our customers and employees may also invest. Substantially all of our employees who have been employed by us for at least three months are participants in the plan. A substantial portion of the plan investments are currently invested in the KBW Fund. Historically, the KBW Fund has invested in publicly traded equity and fixed income securities of financial services companies, and we expect that this policy will continue. Some or all of the employees managing the KBW Fund are participants in the plans investing in the KBW Fund, and are also holders of shares of our common stock. It is our intention, after satisfaction of customer interest in investments, to continue to provide suitable investment opportunities to the KBW Fund consistent with the management policies of the plan fiduciaries and applicable law (including, without limitation, the fiduciary responsibility requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”)). Accordingly, from time to time, there may be cases in which an investment opportunity is made available to the employee profit sharing retirement plan which is not also made available to us (or in which availability is limited) as principal.

Our policies and procedures may limit the investment opportunities for our company.

We have in place compliance procedures and practices designed to protect the confidentiality of client and customer information and to ensure that inside information is not used for making our investment decisions. These procedures and practices may from time to time exceed legal requirements and may limit the freedom of our employees to make potentially profitable investments for us. Moreover, certain rules, such as best execution rules, and fiduciary obligations to customers and our profit-sharing plan under ERISA and other applicable law, may cause us to forego certain investment opportunities.

Risks Related to Our Industry

Risks associated with regulatory impact on capital markets.

Highly-publicized financial scandals in recent years have led to investor concerns over the integrity of the U.S. financial markets, and have prompted Congress, the SEC, the NYSE and Nasdaq to significantly expand corporate governance and public disclosure requirements. To the extent that private companies, in order to avoid becoming subject to these new requirements, decide to forgo initial public offerings, our equity underwriting business may be adversely affected. In addition, provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the corporate governance rules imposed by self-regulatory organizations have diverted many companies’ attention away from capital market transactions, including securities offerings and acquisition and disposition transactions. In particular, companies that are or are planning to be public are incurring significant expenses in complying with the SEC and accounting standards relating to internal control over financial reporting, and companies that disclose material weaknesses in such controls under the new standards may have greater difficulty accessing the capital markets. These factors, in addition to adopted or proposed accounting and disclosure changes, may have an adverse effect on our business.

Financial services firms have been subject to increased scrutiny over the last several years, increasing the risk of financial liability and reputational harm resulting from adverse regulatory actions.

Firms in the financial services industry have experienced increased scrutiny in recent years from a variety of regulators, including the SEC, the NYSE and the NASD (now FINRA), state securities commissions and state attorneys general. FINRA was created in July 2007 through the consolidation of the NASD and the member regulation, enforcement and arbitration functions of the NYSE. Penalties and fines sought by regulatory authorities have increased substantially over the last several years. This regulatory and enforcement environment has created uncertainty with respect to a number of transactions that had historically been entered into by financial services firms and that were generally believed to be permissible and appropriate. We may be adversely affected by changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and rules by these governmental authorities and self-regulatory organizations. We also may be adversely affected as a result of new or revised legislation or regulations imposed by the SEC, other U.S. or foreign governmental regulatory authorities or self-regulatory organizations that supervise the financial markets. Our failure to comply or have complied with applicable laws or regulations could result in fines, suspensions of personnel or other sanctions, including revocation of the registration of us or any of our subsidiaries. Even if a sanction imposed against us or our personnel is small in monetary amount, the adverse publicity arising from the imposition of sanctions against us by regulators could harm our reputation and cause us to lose existing clients or fail to gain new clients. Substantial legal liability or significant regulatory action against us could have material adverse financial effects or cause significant reputational harm to us, which could seriously harm our business prospects.

In addition, financial services firms are subject to numerous conflicts of interests or perceived conflicts. The SEC and other federal and state regulators have increased their scrutiny of potential conflicts of interest. We have adopted various policies, controls and procedures to address or limit actual or perceived conflicts and regularly seek to review and update our policies, controls and procedures. However, appropriately dealing with conflicts of interest is complex and difficult and our reputation could be damaged if we fail, or appear to fail, to deal appropriately with conflicts of interest. Our policies and procedures to address or limit actual or perceived conflicts may also result in increased costs, additional operational personnel and increased regulatory risk. Failure to adhere to these policies and procedures may result in regulatory sanctions or client or customer litigation. For example, the research areas of

investment banks have been and remain the subject of heightened regulatory scrutiny which has led to increased restrictions on the interaction between equity research analysts and investment banking personnel at securities firms. Several securities firms in the United States reached a global settlement in 2003 and 2004 with certain federal and state securities regulators and self-regulatory organizations to resolve investigations into equity research analysts’ alleged conflicts of interest. The settlement included an agreement by the firms to implement structural changes to promote analyst independence, including restrictions on communications between research and investment banking. We are not a party to the global settlement but generally comply with certain of its terms. The SEC and FINRA have proposed amendments to their rules that would affect the manner in which securities are allocated in registered public offerings. We cannot fully predict the practical effect that such restrictions or measures will have on our business, and the SEC and FINRA may adopt additional and more stringent rules with respect to offering procedures and the management of conflicts of interest in the future.

The effort to combat money laundering and terrorist financing is a priority in governmental policy with respect to financial institutions. The obligation of financial institutions, including ourselves, to identify their customers, watch for and report suspicious transactions, respond to requests for information by regulatory authorities and law enforcement agencies, and share information with other financial institutions, has required the implementation and maintenance of internal practices, procedures and controls which have increased, and may continue to increase, our costs, and any failure with respect to our programs in this area could subject us to serious regulatory consequences, including substantial fines, and potentially other liabilities.

Asset management businesses have experienced a number of highly publicized regulatory inquiries concerning market timing, late trading and other activities that focus on the mutual fund industry. These inquiries have resulted in increased scrutiny within the industry and new rules and regulations for mutual funds, investment advisers and broker-dealers. Although we do not act as an investment adviser to mutual funds, the regulatory scrutiny and rulemaking initiatives may result in an increase in operational and compliance costs or the assessment of significant fines or penalties against our asset management business, and may otherwise limit our ability to engage in certain activities. In addition, the SEC staff has conducted studies with respect to soft dollar practices in the brokerage and asset management industries. In July 2006, the SEC issued interpretive guidance regarding the scope of permitted brokerage and research services in connection with soft dollar practices, which has the effect of modifying certain of the SEC’s prior guidance on this subject. The Financial Services Authority has adopted related rules for certain asset managers operating in the United Kingdom. We may become subject to these rules if we establish asset management operations regulated by the Financial Services Authority, or by similar foreign regulators in the future. Recent SEC guidance or additional rulemaking may adversely affect our asset management or sales and trading businesses.

Our exposure to legal liability is significant, and damages that we may be required to pay and the reputational harm that could result from legal or regulatory action against us could materially adversely affect our businesses.

We face significant legal risks in our businesses and, in recent years, the volume of claims and amount of damages sought in litigation and regulatory proceedings against financial institutions have been increasing. These risks include potential liability under securities or other laws for materially false or misleading statements made in connection with securities offerings and other transactions, potential liability for “fairness opinions” and other advice we provide to participants in strategic transactions and disputes over the terms and conditions of complex trading arrangements. We are also potentially subject to claims arising from disputes with employees. These risks often may be difficult to assess or quantify and their existence and magnitude often remain unknown for substantial periods of time.

We depend to a large extent on our reputation for integrity and high-caliber professional services to attract and retain clients and customers. As a result, if a client or customer is not satisfied with our services, it may be more damaging in our business than in other businesses. Moreover, our role as advisor to our clients on important underwriting or M&A transactions involves complex analysis and the exercise of professional judgment, including rendering “fairness opinions” in connection with mergers and other transactions. Therefore, our activities may subject us to the risk of significant legal liabilities to our clients and aggrieved third parties, including shareholders of our clients who could bring securities class actions against us. Our investment banking engagements typically include broad indemnities from our clients and provisions to limit our exposure to legal claims relating to our services, but these provisions may not protect us or may not be enforceable in all cases. As a result, we may incur significant legal and other expenses in defending against litigation and may be required to pay substantial damages for settlements and adverse judgments. Substantial legal liability or significant regulatory action against us could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or cause significant reputational harm to us, which could seriously harm our business and prospects.

Regulatory inquiries and subpoenas or other requests for information or testimony in connection with litigation may require incurrence of significant expenses, including fees for legal representation and fees associated with document production. These costs may be incurred even if we are not a target of the inquiry or a party to litigation.

There have been a number of highly publicized cases involving fraud or other misconduct by employees in the financial services industry in recent years, and we run the risk that employee misconduct could occur at our company. For example, misconduct by employees could involve the improper use or disclosure of confidential information, which could result in regulatory sanctions and serious reputational or financial harm. It is not always possible to deter employee misconduct and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in all cases, and we may suffer significant reputational harm for any misconduct by our employees.

Risks Related to Our Shares

We are controlled by our employee stockholders whose interests may differ from those of other stockholders.

Our employees collectively own a majority of the total shares of common stock entitled to vote and our executive officers collectively own approximately 11.0% of the total shares of common stock entitled to vote as of February 15, 2008. The percentage of employee holdings may increase as result of the practice since our IPO of paying a portion of annual bonuses to certain employees in the form of restricted stock. Although our stockholders’ agreement does not contain any provisions regarding the voting of common stock owned by any of our employees, a relatively small group of employees may be able to elect our entire board of directors, control our management and policies and, in general, determine without the consent of the other stockholders the outcome of any corporate transaction or other matter submitted to the stockholders for approval, including mergers, consolidations and the sale of all or substantially all of our assets. Such persons initially will be able to prevent or cause a change in control of our company. These actions may be taken even if other stockholders oppose them.

Provisions of our organizational documents may discourage an acquisition of our company.

Our organizational documents contain provisions that will impede the removal of directors and may discourage a third party from making a proposal to acquire our company. For example, our board of directors may, without the consent of stockholders, issue preferred stock with greater voting rights than the common stock. If a change of control or change in management that stockholders might otherwise

consider to be favorable is prevented or delayed, the market price of our common stock could decline. Other provisions of our organizational documents and Delaware corporate law impose various procedural and other requirements that could make it more difficult for stockholders to effect certain corporate actions.

Future sales of our common stock could cause our stock price to decline.

Sales of substantial amounts of common stock by our employees and other stockholders, or the possibility of such sales, may adversely affect the price of our common stock and impede our ability to raise capital through the issuance of additional equity securities. As of February 15, 2008, we have 29,415,652 shares of common stock outstanding, not including 1,350,329 shares underlying restricted stock units and 3,938,736 restricted shares issued under restricted stock awards. Of these shares, the 7,820,000 shares of common stock sold in our initial public offering and 1,527,046 shares owned by former employees not subject to transfer restrictions or which represent vested restricted stock awards are freely transferable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act. As of February 15, 2008, 20,068,606 shares are subject to sale restrictions set forth in our Stockholders’ Agreement, which generally restricts sales of common stock through the fifth anniversary of our IPO in November 2011. As of that date, 2,408,400 unvested IPO Restricted Stock Awards also remain outstanding. Restrictions on transfer or sale will terminate in November 2008 on 25% of the shares covered under the Stockholders’ Agreement and IPO Restricted Stock Award Agreements. Sales of shares by our officers and employees upon the lapsing of these sale restrictions may result in a decrease in the trading price of our common stock and restrict our ability to raise capital through the issuance of equity securities.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2. Properties.

Our offices, are located in New York City, Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Columbus (Ohio), Hartford, Houston, Richmond (Virginia), San Francisco, and London. Our headquarters are located at 787 Seventh Avenue, New York, New York, and comprise approximately 120,573 square feet of leased space, pursuant to a lease agreement expiring in 2016. All of the other offices are in leased space or we have entered into new leases for space, which we currently believe to be adequate for our needs.

Some of our leases contain options to extend the term of the lease or lease additional space. We believe that all of our properties and facilities are well maintained. In September 2007, we entered into a sublease that expires in August 2015 providing for additional space in our New York headquarters building. We do not anticipate a need for other material additional office space in the near term.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

We face significant legal risks in our businesses and, in recent years, the volume of claims and amount of damages sought in litigation and regulatory proceedings against financial institutions have been increasing. These risks include potential liability under federal securities and other laws in connection with securities offerings and other transactions, as well as advice and opinions we provide concerning strategic transactions. In addition, like most financial institutions, we are often the subject of claims made by current and former employees arising out of their employment or termination of employment with us. These claims often relate to dissatisfaction with an employee’s bonus or separation payment, or involve allegations that the employee was the subject of some form of discrimination or other unlawful employment practice. See “Risk Factors—Our exposure to legal liability is significant, and damages that we may be required to pay and the reputational harm that

could result from legal or regulatory action against us could materially adversely affect our businesses.”

We are involved in a number of judicial and regulatory matters arising in connection with our business. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such matters, particularly in cases where claimants seek substantial or indeterminate damages or where investigations and proceedings are in the early stages, we cannot predict with certainty the loss or range of loss, if any, related to such matters, how such matters will be resolved, when they will ultimately be resolved, or what the eventual settlement, fine, penalty or other relief, if any, might be. Pursuant to SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” we review the need for any loss contingency reserves, and we have established reserves that we believe are adequate where, in the opinion of management, the likelihood of liability is probable and the extent of such liability is reasonably estimatable.

Regulatory Inquiries and Investigations

We are involved, from time to time, in reviews, investigations and proceedings (both formal and informal) by governmental and self-regulatory agencies regarding our business, certain of which may result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions or other relief. The number of these reviews, investigations and proceedings has increased in recent years for many firms in the financial services industry, including our company.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

None.

PART II


Item 5.		*Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.*

On November 14, 2006, a total of 7,820,000 shares of our common stock par value $0.01 per share, were sold in our initial public offering pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-1 (Commission file number 333-136509) which was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 8, 2006. We have used the net proceeds from our initial public offering for general corporate purposes, including support and expansion of our existing businesses, with any remaining unused net proceeds being currently invested in a money market fund.

Our common stock is traded on the NYSE under the symbol “KBW”.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing prices per share of our common stock, as quoted on the NYSE. For 2006, the high and low closing prices per share begins on November 9, 2006, the first day our common stock was publicly traded.


	Sales Price
	High		Low
2007
Fourth Quarter	$	32.92	$	24.48
Third Quarter		30.87		22.74
Second Quarter		35.19		29.38
First Quarter		37.84		28.33

2006
Fourth Quarter (since November 9, 2006)	$	30.40	$	25.51

As of December 31, 2007, there were 596 holders of record or our common stock. However, we believe the number of beneficial owners of our common stock exceeds this number.

No dividends have been declared or paid on our common stock. We do not anticipate that we will pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

On February 26, 2008, the last reported sales price for our common stock on the NYSE was $24.74 per share.

Information relating to compensation plans under which our common stock is authorized for issuance will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our annual meeting of stockholders to be held on June 3, 2008 (to be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2007) (the “Proxy Statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders”) and is incorporated by reference in Part III, Item 12.

There were no purchases made by or on behalf of KBW, Inc. or any “affiliated purchaser” (as defined in Rule 10B-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act), of our common stock during the quarter ended December 31, 2007.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

Set forth below is selected consolidated financial and other data of KBW as of and for the five years ended December 31, 2007.


	Years Ended December 31,
	2007			2006			2005			2004			2003
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share information)

Revenues:
Investment banking	$	226,464		$	210,026		$	149,332		$	163,114		$	156,869
Commissions		165,803			116,625			96,301			66,081			50,408
Principal transactions, net		(7,520	)		45,773	(1)		36,568			44,637			44,208
Interest and dividend income		37,612			26,920			17,984			8,629			8,656
Investment advisory fees		1,751			5,036			3,843			4,896			5,597
Other		3,418			2,206			3,838	(2)		12,941	(2)		5,859

Total revenues		427,528			406,586			307,866			300,298			271,597

Expenses:
Compensation and benefits		257,070			216,518			187,428			170,484			145,668

Occupancy and equipment		18,722			17,728			16,877			14,545			10,108
Communications and data processing		24,283			19,465			18,526			15,462			11,600
Brokerage and clearance		22,967			19,728			17,390			15,289			10,857
Interest		14,732			11,023			8,105			872			875
Business development		16,601			13,218			13,141			11,772			9,703
Other		23,748			17,257			15,257			16,734			14,548

Total non-compensation expenses		121,053			98,419			89,296			74,674			57,691

Total expenses		378,123			314,937			276,724			245,158			203,359

Income before income taxes		49,405			91,649			31,142			55,140			68,238
Income taxes		22,113			38,365			13,735			23,867			30,073

Net income(3)	$	27,292		$	53,284		$	17,407		$	31,273		$	38,165


Earnings per share(3) (4):
Basic	$	0.89		$	1.94		$	0.64		$	1.24		$	1.70
Diluted	$	0.86		$	1.93		$	0.64		$	1.24		$	1.70

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding(4):
Basic		30,654,058			27,512,023			27,194,404			25,253,771			22,393,454
Diluted		31,561,751			27,565,453			27,215,001			25,296,556			22,427,295

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition Data:
Total assets	$	864,450		$	804,865		$	661,161		$	574,564		$	436,819
Stockholders’ equity(3)	$	448,426		$	397,414		$	265,709		$	269,122		$	206,536

Other Data (Unaudited):
Book value per common share	$	15.31		$	13.59		$	10.13		$	10.81		$	9.65


(1)		Principal transactions, net for the year ended December 31, 2006 included a gain of approximately $5.4 million with respect to the exchange of our New York Stock Exchange seat for cash and shares of the merged NYSE Group, Inc.

(2)		Other revenues in 2004 include approximately $10.1 million in insurance recoveries and government grants relating to the World Trade Center attacks in 2001. In 2005, we received approximately $0.4 million of additional government grants relating to the same World Trade Center attacks.

(3)		Prior to the date of the IPO and the termination of the 2005 amended and restated stockholders’ agreement, common stock was classified as a liability. See Note 9 to our audited Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report.

(4)		In calculating shares of common stock outstanding, we give retroactive effect to a 43 for 1 stock split that we effected on November 1, 2006.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this report. In addition to historical information, this discussion includes forward-looking information that involves risks and assumptions, which could cause actual results to differ materially from management’s expectations. See “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” included in the beginning of this report.

Overview

We are a leading full service investment bank specializing in the financial services industry. Our principal activities are: (i) investment banking, including mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”) and other strategic advisory services, equity and fixed income securities offerings, structured finance for trust preferred and similar capital securities issued by financial institutions and mutual thrift conversions, (ii) equity and fixed income sales and trading, with an emphasis on institutional customers investing in the small and mid cap segments, and a wide range of fixed income securities, (iii) research that provides fundamental, objective analysis that identifies investment opportunities and helps our investor customers make better investment decisions, and (iv) asset management, including investment management and other advisory services to institutional clients and private high net worth clients and various investment vehicles.

Within our full service business model, our focus includes bank and thrift holding companies, banks and thrifts, insurance companies, broker-dealers, mortgage banks, asset management companies, REITs, consumer and specialty finance firms, financial processing companies and securities exchanges. We emphasize serving investment banking clients in the small and mid cap segments of the financial services industry. Our sales customers are primarily institutional investors.

Most revenues with respect to our services provided are primarily determined as a result of active competition in the marketplace. Our revenues are primarily generated through advisory, underwriting and private placement fees earned through our investment banking activities, commissions earned on equity sales and trading activities, interest and dividends earned on our securities’ inventories and profit and losses from trading activities related to the securities’ inventories.

Compensation and benefits comprise the most significant component with respect to our expenses. Our performance is dependant on our ability to attract, develop and retain highly skilled employees who are motivated to provide quality service and guidance to our clients.

Many external factors affect our revenues and profitability. Such factors include equity and fixed income trading prices and volumes, the volatility of these markets, the level and shape of the yield curve, political events and regulatory developments and competition. These factors influence our investment banking operations in that such factors affect the number and timing of equity and fixed income securities issuances and M&A activity within the financial services industry. These same factors also affect our sales and trading business by impacting equity and fixed income trading prices and volumes and valuations in secondary financial markets. Commission rates, market volatility and other factors also affect our sales and trading revenues. These business environmental issues are unpredictable and beyond our control, and our revenues and earnings may fluctuate significantly from period to period and the results of any one period should not be considered indicative of future results.

A significant portion of our expense base is variable, including employee compensation and benefits, brokerage and clearance, communication and data processing and travel and entertainment expenses. Our remaining costs generally do not directly relate to the service revenues earned.

Certain data processing systems that support equity and fixed income trading, research, payroll, human resources and employee benefits are service bureau based and are operated in the vendors’ data centers. We believe that this stabilizes our fixed costs associated with data processing. We also license vendor information databases to support investment banking, sales and trading and research. Vendors may, at the end of contractual terms, terminate our rights or modify or significantly alter product and service offerings or related fees, which may affect our ongoing business activities or related costs.

Business Environment

Since our business activities focus on the financial services sector, we are uniquely impacted by economic and market conditions affecting this sector. Trends in the global economy and domestic and international financial markets have a significant impact on the outlook for financial services, including the market prices for our securities and the securities of other companies in the sector.

In the second half of 2007, the deterioration in credit quality for sub-prime loans spread to the broader credit markets, leading to a repricing of credit risks, general widening of credit spreads, lower levels of liquidity and a significant decrease in transparency in pricing for many classes of fixed income securities. In addition, criteria used by rating agencies have also come under scrutiny, which may lead to future revisions to such criteria. Increased volatility across fixed income and equity markets has contributed to reductions in trading revenues and asset valuations for many financial services companies. These trends have combined to put significant pressure on credit ratings and equity prices for companies in the financial services sector.

Our investment banking revenues, in the form of financial advisory and debt and equity underwriting and private placement fees, are directly related to the number and size of the transactions in which we participate. Continued market pressures may have a negative impact on advisory fees from mergers and acquisitions, as a result of uncertainties in valuations related to potential future asset quality and creditworthiness concerns for both targets and acquirors and limitations on access to capital markets to finance such activities. In addition, these uncertainties may limit the capital markets activities of certain companies or sub-sectors of the financial service industry.

It is difficult to predict how long these conditions will continue. Further credit market dislocations or sustained market downturns may exacerbate the impact of these factors on our overall revenues.

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2007 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2006

Overview

Total revenues increased $20.9 million, or 5.2%, to $427.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with $406.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. This increase was primarily due to increases in commissions revenue of $49.2 million, investment banking revenue of $16.4 million and interest and dividend income of $10.7 million, offset by a decrease in principal transactions, net of $53.3 million.

Total expenses increased $63.2 million, or 20.1%, to $378.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with $314.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. This increase was primarily due to an increase in compensation and benefits expense of $40.6 million. Additionally, non-compensation expenses increased $22.6 million to $121.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 primarily as a result of increases in other expenses and communications and data processing expenses.

We recorded net income of $27.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with $53.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. The following table provides a comparison of our revenues and expenses for the periods presented:


	Year Ended December 31,					Period to Period
	2007			2006		$ Change			% Change
	(dollars in thousands)
Revenues:
Investment banking	$	226,464		$	210,026	$	16,438			7.8	%
Commissions		165,803			116,625		49,178			42.2
Principal transactions, net		(7,520	)		45,773		(53,293	)		(116.4	)
Interest and dividend income		37,612			26,920		10,692			39.7
Investment advisory fees		1,751			5,036		(3,285	)		(65.2	)
Other		3,418			2,206		1,212			54.9

Total revenues		427,528			406,586		20,942			5.2

Expenses:
Compensation and benefits		257,070			216,518		40,552			18.7

Occupancy and equipment		18,722			17,728		994			5.6
Communications and data processing		24,283			19,465		4,818			24.8
Brokerage and clearance		22,967			19,728		3,239			16.4
Interest		14,732			11,023		3,709			33.6
Business development		16,601			13,218		3,383			25.6
Other		23,748			17,257		6,491			37.6

Total non-compensation expenses		121,053			98,419		22,634			23.0

Total expenses		378,123			314,937		63,186			20.1

Income before income taxes		49,405			91,649		(42,244	)		(46.1	)
Income taxes		22,113			38,365		(16,252	)		(42.4	)

Net income (Note 9)	$	27,292		$	53,284	$	(25,992	)		(48.8	)%

2007 and 2006 Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We adopted SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, on January 1, 2006 which generally requires the measurement of compensation cost for stock-based awards at fair value on the date of grant and recognition of compensation expense over the requisite service period, net of estimated forfeitures.

We reported our compensation and benefits expense, income before income tax expense, income tax expense, net income, compensation ratio and basic and diluted earnings per share on a non-GAAP basis for the year ended December 31, 2007 in our February 5, 2008 press release. The non-GAAP amount excludes the amortization of stock awards to compensation expense associated with the grant of IPO restricted stock awards to our employees. The following provides details with respect to reconciling compensation and benefits expense, income before income tax expense, income tax expense, net income, compensation ratio and basic and diluted earnings per share on a GAAP basis for the year ended December 31, 2007 to the aforementioned captions on a non-GAAP basis in the same period.

(Dollars in thousands, except per share information)


				Reconciliation
	GAAP			Amount			Non-GAAP
Year ended December 31, 2007:
Compensation and benefits expense	$	257,070		$	(12,509	)(a)	$	244,561

Income before income tax expense	$	49,405		$	12,509	(a)	$	61,914
Income tax expense	$	22,113		$	5,599	(b)	$	27,712

Net income	$	27,292		$	6,910	(c)	$	34,202


Compensation ratio (d)		60.1	%					57.2	%

Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.89		$	0.23		$	1.12
Diluted	$	0.86		$	0.22		$	1.08

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic		30,654,058			—	(e)		30,654,058
Diluted		31,561,751			—	(e)		31,561,751

Year ended December 31, 2006:
Compensation and benefits expense	$	216,518		$	(1,882	)(a)	$	214,636

Income before income tax expense	$	91,649			1,882	(a)	$	93,531
Income tax expense	$	38,365		$	821	(b)	$	39,186

Net income	$	53,284		$	1,061	(c)	$	54,345


Compensation ratio (d)		53.3	%					52.8	%

Earnings per share:
Basic	$	1.94		$	0.04		$	1.98
Diluted	$	1.93		$	0.04		$	1.97

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic		27,512,023			—	(e)		27,512,023
Diluted		27,565,453			—	(e)		27,565,453


(a)		The non-GAAP adjustment represents the pre-tax expense with respect to the amortization of the IPO restricted stock awards granted to employees on November 8, 2006.

(b)		The non-GAAP adjustment to income tax expense represents the elimination of the tax benefit resulting from the amortization of the IPO restricted stock awards in the period.

(c)		The non-GAAP adjustment to net income was the after-tax amortization of the IPO restricted stock awards in the respective periods.

(d)		The twelve months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 compensation ratios were calculated by dividing compensation and benefits expense by total revenues of $427,528 and $406,586, respectively.

(e)		Both the basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding were not adjusted.

We expect to grant restricted stock awards and other share-based compensation in the future. We do not expect to make any such substantial grants to employees outside of our regular compensation and hiring process, as we did when we granted IPO restricted stock awards in connection with our IPO.

Our management has utilized non-GAAP calculations of presented compensation expense, tax expense, net income and basic and diluted earnings per share that are adjusted in the manner presented above as an additional device to aid in understanding and analyzing our financial results for the year ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. Specifically, our management believes that the non-GAAP measures provide useful information by excluding certain items that may not be indicative of our core operating results and business outlook. Our management believes that these non-GAAP measures will allow for a better evaluation of the operating performance of our business and facilitate meaningful comparison of our results in the current period to those in prior periods and future periods. These periods did not in the past, and likely will not in the future include such substantial grants of restricted stock awards to employees. Our reference to these non-GAAP measures should not be considered as a substitute for results that are presented in a manner consistent with GAAP. These non-GAAP measures are provided to enhance investors’ overall understanding of our current financial performance.

A limitation of utilizing these non-GAAP measures of compensation expense, tax expense, net income and basic and diluted earnings per share is that the GAAP accounting effects of these events do in fact reflect the underlying financial results of our business and these effects should not be ignored in evaluating and analyzing our financial results. Therefore, management believes that both our GAAP measures of compensation expense, tax expense, net income and basic and diluted earnings per share and the same respective non-GAAP measures of our financial performance should be considered together.

Revenues

Investment Banking

Investment banking revenues increased $16.4 million, or 7.8%, to $226.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with $210.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. Our underwriting revenues increased $32.3 million, or 54.1%, to $92.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $59.7 million for the year 2006. M&A and advisory fees increased $21.9 million, or 34.2%, to $86.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $64.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. Private placement revenues decreased $37.8 million, or 43.9%, to $48.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $86.2 million for the year 2006. This decrease was primarily due to smaller and less profitable PreTSL™ structured finance transactions in 2007 than in 2006.

Commissions

Commissions revenue increased $49.2 million, or 42.2%, to $165.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with $116.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. Commissions on European equities totaled $65.2 million for 2007 compared to $39.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, an increase of $25.7 million, or 65.1%. Commissions of U.S. equities totaled $100.6 million for 2007 compared to $77.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, an increase of $23.4 million, or 30.3%. Our commissions revenue increased partially as a result of the historically high volume of trading in financial services stocks as a result of the market volatility in the second half of 2007.

Principal Transactions, Net

Principal transactions resulted in net losses of $7.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to net gains of $45.8 million for 2006. Equity market making activity and trading for our own account resulted in net losses of $0.9 million for the year ending December 31, 2007 compared to net gains of $17.0 million in 2006. Trading in fixed income securities for customers and unrealized losses on fixed income securities owned, including securities held for PreTSL™ securitizations, resulted in net losses of $7.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to net gains of $16.1 million in 2006. These losses were partially offset by net gains on firm investments of $0.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to net gains of $12.6 million for 2006.

Interest and Dividend Income

Interest and dividend income increased $10.7 million, or 39.7%, to $37.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with $26.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. This increase was primarily due to higher average interest bearing assets owned in 2007 relative to 2006.

Investment Advisory Fees

Investment advisory fees decreased $3.2 million, or 65.2%, to $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with $5.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. The decrease in 2007 compared with 2006 was primarily due to not earning investment performance fees from hedge funds managed.

Other

Other revenues increased $1.2 million, or 54.9%, to $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with $2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Expenses

Compensation and Benefits

Compensation and benefits expense increased $40.6 million, or 18.7%, to $257.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with $216.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase was primarily due to an increase in our number of employees, including as a result of the expansion of our research to include equity REITs, as well as and expenses related to the amortization of stock-based compensation granted in November 2006 and February 2007.

Compensation and benefits expense as a percentage of total revenue, after deducting from such expense the non-cash amortization expense associated with the IPO restricted stock awards, was 57.2% for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with 52.8% for 2006. The unadjusted compensation and benefits percentage of total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2007 was 60.1% compared to 53.3% in the same 2006 period. See the section above entitled “—2007 and 2006 Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for a reconciliation to our GAAP results.

Occupancy and Equipment

Occupancy and equipment expenses increased $1.0 million, or 5.6%, to $18.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with $17.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, primarily due to higher operating and real estate taxes under leases.

Communications and Data Processing

Communications and data processing expense increased $4.8 million, or 24.8%, to $24.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with $19.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. This increase resulted from higher average staff size and price increases for market data services.

Brokerage and Clearance

Brokerage and clearance expense increased $3.2 million, or 16.4%, to $23.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with $19.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase was primarily a result of higher volume in equity trading for customers as a result of volatility in the marketplace particularly for financial services stocks. The higher volume of transactions was partially offset by lower clearance and execution charges for U.S. equity transactions.

Interest

Interest expense increased $3.7 million, or 33.6%, to $14.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with $11.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase was primarily due to larger average balances of securities sold under repurchase agreements in 2007 relative to 2006.

Business Development

Business development expense increased $3.4 million, or 25.6%, to $16.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with $13.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. This increase was primarily due to increased travel and entertainment expenses including additional client events in 2007.

Other

Other expense increased $6.4 million, or 37.6%, to $23.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with $17.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. This increase was primarily due to higher professional fees and insurance premiums.

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense was $22.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, which equals an effective tax rate of 44.8%, compared to $38.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, which equals an effective tax rate of 41.9%. The increase in the effective tax rate in 2007 compared to 2006 was primarily due to a reduction in the level of pre-tax earnings which increased the impact of certain permanent differences.

Year Ended December 31, 2006 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2005

Overview

Total revenues increased $98.7 million, or 32.1%, to $406.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared with $307.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. This increase was primarily due to increases in investment banking revenue of $60.7 million, commissions revenue of $20.3 million, principal transactions, net of $9.2 million and interest and dividend income of $8.9 million.

Total expenses increased $38.2 million, or 13.8%, to $314.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared with $276.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. This increase was primarily due to an increase in compensation and benefits expense of $29.1 million. Additionally, non-compensation expenses increased $9.1 million primarily as a result of an increase in interest expense and brokerage and clearance.

We recorded net income of $53.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared with $17.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. The following table provides a comparison of our revenues and expenses for the periods presented:


	Year Ended December 31,				Period to Period
	2006		2005		$ Change			% Change
			(dollars in thousands)
Revenues:
Investment banking	$	210,026	$	149,332	$	60,694			40.6	%
Commissions		116,625		96,301		20,324			21.1
Principal transactions, net		45,773		36,568		9,205			25.2
Interest and dividend income		26,920		17,984		8,936			49.7
Investment advisory fees		5,036		3,843		1,193			31.0
Other		2,206		3,838		(1,632	)		(42.5	)

Total revenues		406,586		307,866		98,720			32.1

Expenses:
Compensation and benefits		216,518		187,428		29,090			15.5

Occupancy and equipment		17,728		16,877		851			5.0
Communications and data processing		19,465		18,526		939			5.1
Brokerage and clearance		19,728		17,390		2,338			13.4
Interest		11,023		8,105		2,918			36.0
Business development		13,218		13,141		77			0.6
Other		17,257		15,257		2,000			13.1

Total non-compensation expenses		98,419		89,296		9,123			10.2

Total expenses		314,937		276,724		38,213			13.8

Income before income taxes		91,649		31,142		60,507			194.3
Income taxes		38,365		13,735		24,630			179.3

Net income (Note 9)	$	53,284	$	17,407	$	35,877			206.1	%

2006 Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The following provides details with respect to reconciling compensation and benefits expense, income before income tax expense, income tax expense, net income, compensation ratio and basic and diluted earnings per share on a GAAP basis for the year ended December 31, 2006 to such items on a non-GAAP basis in the same period:

(Dollars in thousands, except per share information)


	December 31, 2006									December 31, 2005
				Reconciliation
	GAAP			Amount			Non-GAAP			GAAP
Compensation and benefits expense	$	216,518		$	(1,882	)(a)	$	214,636		$	187,428
Income before income tax expense	$	91,649		$	1,882	(a)	$	93,531		$	31,142
Income tax expense	$	38,365		$	821	(b)	$	39,186		$	13,735
Net income	$	53,284		$	1,061	(c)	$	54,345		$	17,407

Compensation ratio (d)		53.3	%					52.8	%		60.9	%

Earnings per share:
Basic	$	1.94		$	0.04		$	1.98		$	0.64
Diluted	$	1.93		$	0.04		$	1.97		$	0.64

Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		27,512,023			—	(e)		27,512,023			27,194,404
Diluted		27,565,453			—	(e)		27,565,453			27,215,001


(a)		The non-GAAP adjustment represents the pre-tax expense with respect to the amortization of the IPO restricted stock awards granted to employees on November 8, 2006.

(b)		The non-GAAP adjustment to income tax expense represents the elimination of the tax benefit resulting from the amortization of the IPO restricted stock awards in the period.

(c)		The non-GAAP adjustment to net income was the after-tax amortization of the IPO restricted stock awards in the respective periods.

(d)		The twelve months ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 compensation ratios were calculated by dividing compensation and benefits expense by total revenues of $406,586 and $307,866, respectively.

(e)		Both the basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding were not adjusted.

See the section entitled “—2007 and 2006 Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for a discussion regarding the reasons why management believes a presentation of non-GAAP financial measures provides useful information for investors regarding our financial condition and results of operations.

Revenues

Investment Banking

Investment banking revenues increased $60.7 million, or 40.6%, to $210.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared with $149.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. M&A advisory fees increased $7.1 million, or 12.5%, to $64.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $57.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. Private placement revenues increased $37.0 million, or 75.2%, to $86.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $49.2 million for the year 2005. This increase was primarily due to larger structured finance transactions in 2006 than in 2005. Our underwriting revenues increased $16.6 million, or 38.5%, to $59.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $43.1 million for the year 2005. The increase in underwriting revenues resulted from an increase in equity underwriting activity in 2006 and more lead managed transactions in 2006 versus 2005.

Commissions

Commissions revenue increased $20.3 million, or 21.1% to $116.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared with $96.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, primarily due to increases of $14.0 million and $6.3 million in commissions revenue related to our European and U.S. equity activities, respectively.

Principal Transactions, Net

Principal transactions revenue increased $9.2 million, or 25.2%, to $45.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared with $36.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. Such increase was the net result of:

	•		Higher realized and unrealized gains from proprietary trading in equity securities.

	•		Decreased volume in transactions with customers in fixed-income securities, leading to lower aggregate markups and markdowns.

	•		Lower realized and unrealized losses from market-making positions in equity securities.

	•		Gain of $5.4 million with respect to the exchange of our NYSE seat for cash and shares of NYSE Group, Inc.

Interest and Dividend Income

Interest and dividend income increased $8.9 million, or 49.7%, to $26.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared with $18.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 primarily due to higher average interest bearing assets, primarily capital securities held for securitization, and higher interest rates in 2006 relative to 2005.

Investment Advisory Fees

Investment advisory fees increased $1.2 million, or 31.0%, to $5.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared with $3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. The increase resulted from higher performance fees on equity hedge funds.

Other

Other revenues decreased $1.6 million, or 42.5%, to $2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared with $3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Expenses

Compensation and Benefits

Compensation and benefits expense increased $29.1 million, or 15.5%, to $216.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared with $187.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. The increase was related to our increase in revenues which resulted in higher bonuses in 2006. Compensation and benefits as a percentage of total revenue was 53.3% in 2006 compared to 60.9% in 2005.

Compensation and benefits expense for the year ended December 31, 2006 does not include the February 2007 grant of restricted stock to our employees which was based on their performance during 2006 and had a grant date fair value of $10.8 million. These equity awards will generally vest and be expensed pro rata over the three-year period beginning on the date of grant.

Occupancy and Equipment

Occupancy and equipment expense increased $0.9 million, or 5.0%, to $17.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared with $16.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Communications and Data Processing

Communications and data processing expense increased $0.9 million, or 5.1%, to $19.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared with $18.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Brokerage and Clearance

Brokerage and clearance expense increased $2.3 million, or 13.4%, to $19.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared with $17.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. The increase was primarily due to greater volume of execution through local brokers in certain European markets in which we were not a member of the local stock exchange and higher electronic execution service charges.

Interest

Interest expense increased $2.9 million, or 36.0%, to $11.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared with $8.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. The increase was due to short-term borrowings secured by capital securities held for securitization in 2006 as well as generally higher interest rates in 2006.

Business Development

Business development increased slightly to $13.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared with $13.1 million for the same 2005 period.

Other

Other expense increased $2.0 million, or 13.1%, to $17.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared with $15.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. Other expenses increased primarily due to increases in corporate contributions and professional fees.

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense was $38.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, which equals an effective tax rate of 41.9%, compared to $13.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, which equals an effective tax rate of 44.1%. The decrease in the effective tax rate from 2006 compared to 2005 was due to a relative reduction in state and local tax expense.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

KBW, Inc. is the parent of Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. (“Keefe”) and Keefe, Bruyette & Woods Limited (“KBWL”). Dividends and other transfers from our primary operating subsidiaries are our source of funds to satisfy our capital and liquidity requirements. Applicable laws and regulations, primarily the net capital rules discussed below, restrict dividends and transfers from Keefe and KBWL to us. Our rights to participate in the assets of any subsidiary are also subject to prior claims of the subsidiary’s creditors, including customers and trade creditors of Keefe, KBWL and KBW Asset Management.

We monitor and evaluate the composition and size of our assets and operating liabilities. As a result of our market making, customer and proprietary activities (including securitization activities), the overall size of total assets and operating liabilities fluctuate from period to period. Our other assets generally consist of cash and cash equivalents, securities, resale agreement balances and receivables.

Our operating activities generate cash resulting from net income earned during the period and fluctuations in our current assets and liabilities. The most significant fluctuations in current assets and liabilities have resulted from changes in the level of customer activity, changes in financial instruments owned in response to changing trading strategies and market conditions.

We have historically satisfied our capital and liquidity requirements through capital raised from our stockholders and internally generated cash from operations. As of December 31, 2007, we had liquid assets of $409.4 million, primarily consisting of cash and cash equivalents, securities purchased under resale agreements and receivables from clearing brokers. We also periodically utilize short term bank debt to finance certain capital securities positions held at the holding company level to support the PreTSL™ product pool formation. On two occasions in the past three years, we obtained a short term subordinated loans to support underwriting activity over a very short time period. Although we believe such sources remain available, we do not currently have any plans to obtain such short term subordinated financing from any outside source.

The timing of bonus and retention compensation payments to our employees may significantly affect our cash position and liquidity from period to period. While our employees are generally paid salaries semi-monthly during the year, bonus and retention compensation payments, which make up a larger portion of total compensation, are generally paid once a year. Bonus and retention compensation payments for a given year are generally paid in February of the following year. We continually monitor our liquidity position and believe our available liquidity will be sufficient to fund our ongoing activities over the next twelve months.

Keefe is a registered U.S. broker-dealer that is subject to the Uniform Net Capital Rule (SEC Rule 15c3-1 or the Net Capital Rule) administered by the SEC and FINRA, which requires the maintenance of minimum net capital. We use the basic method permitted by the uniform net capital rule, which generally requires that the ratios of aggregate indebtedness to net capital shall not exceed 15 to 1. These rules may prohibit a member firm from expanding its business or paying dividends if resulting net capital would be below the regulatory limit. We expect these limits will not impact our ability to meet current and future obligations.

At December 31, 2007, Keefe’s net capital under the SEC’s Uniform Net Capital Rule was $100.3 million, or $90.9 million in excess of the minimum required net capital.

KBWL is subject to the capital requirements of the U.K. Financial Services Authority. KBWL’s financial resources exceeded financial resources requirement by approximately $33.0 million at December 31, 2007.

The regulatory requirements referred to above restrict the Company’s ability to withdraw capital from its regulated subsidiaries, which was approximately $140.7 million as of December 31, 2007.

Cash Flows

Year ended December 31, 2007. Cash increased $28.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2007, primarily due to positive cash flows from operating activities.

Our operating activities provided $28.1 million of cash due to net income, adjusted for non-cash revenue and expense items of $8.8 million, of $36.1 million, offset by cash used by an increase in operating assets of $16.6 million less cash provided by an increase in operating liabilities of $8.6 million. The non-cash items consisted primarily of amortization of stock-based compensation of $20.6 million, deferred income tax benefit of $10.1 million, non-monetary revenue of $6.5 million and depreciation and amortization expense of $4.9 million. Cash provided from the increase in operating liabilities consisted primarily of increases in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities of $5.6 million, securities sold under repurchase agreements of $10.2 million and short-term borrowings of $36.6 million, offset by a decreased in financial instruments sold, not yet purchased, at fair value of $34.1 million and income taxes payable of $9.7 million. The decrease in cash from operating assets was primarily attributable to increases in receivables from clearing brokers of $5.5 million, other assets of $9.0 million and financial instruments owned, at fair value of $45.0 million offset by decreases in securities purchased under resale agreements of $38.5 million and accounts receivable of $4.5 million.

We used $2.5 million in our investing activities, for the purchase of fixed assets. Cash from financing activities increased $2.6 million primarily as a result of repayment of loans to employees to purchase Company stock.

Year ended December 31, 2006. Cash increased $90.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2006, primarily due to positive cash flows from operating and financing activities, partially offset by cash used in investing activities.

Our operating activities provided $18.5 million of cash due to net income, adjusted for non-cash revenue and expense items of $9.7 million, of $63.0 million, and cash provided from the change in operating liabilities of $12.0 million, offset by a decrease in cash from operating assets of $56.5 million. The non-cash items consisted primarily of depreciation and amortization expense of $5.9 million, deferred income tax liabilities of $0.3 million and amortization of stock-based compensation related to restricted stock of $3.5 million. Cash provided from the increase in operating liabilities consisted

primarily of an $82.3 million increase in securities sold under repurchase agreements, an increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities of $36.3 million, securities sold, not yet purchased, at fair value of $14.0 million partially offset by decreases in short-term borrowings and payable to clearing broker of $35.3 million and $92.0 million, respectively. The decrease in cash from operating assets was primarily attributable to an increase in receivables from clearing broker of $94.1 million and securities purchased under resale agreement of $18.4 million. These increases were partially offset by a decline in financial instruments owned, at fair value of $55.9 million.

We used $3.4 million in our investing activities for the purchase of fixed assets. Cash from financing activities increased $72.6 million primarily as a result of the net proceeds from the IPO.

Year ended December 31, 2005. Cash increased $15.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2005, primarily due to positive operating cash flow, offset by cash used in financing activities.

Our operating activities provided $44.7 million of cash due to net income, adjusted for non-cash revenue and expense items of $4.6 million, of $22.0 million, and cash provided from the change in operating liabilities of $90.0 million, offset by a decrease in cash from operating assets of $67.4 million. The non-cash items consisted primarily of depreciation and amortization expense of $5.7 million, deferred income tax benefits of $2.8 million and amortization of stock-based compensation related to restricted stock units of $1.7 million. Cash provided from the increase in operating liabilities consisted primarily of a $92.0 million increase in payables to clearing broker and an increase in short-term borrowings of $63.8 million, partially offset by a decrease of $41.3 million in financial instruments sold, not yet purchased and $25.5 million in securities sold under repurchase agreements. The decrease in cash from operating assets was primarily attributable to a $121.3 million increase in financial instruments owned, partially offset by a decrease of $40.4 million in receivables from clearing brokers and a decrease of $21.9 million in securities purchased under resale agreements. The reduction in receivables from clearing brokers was a result of the creation of a holding company structure in August 2005 in which our operating subsidiary paid us a cash dividend.

We used $6.1 million in our investing activities, for the purchase of fixed assets. Financing activities used $20.8 million in cash primarily for the payment of a dividend to stockholders of $36.7 million, which was the only dividend we have ever paid, partially offset by proceeds from the issuance of our common stock for $18.3 million.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We base our estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. The use of different estimates and assumptions could produce materially different results. For example, if factors such as those described in Item 1A under “Risk Factors” cause actual events to differ from the assumptions we used in applying the accounting policies, our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity could be materially adversely affected.

Our significant accounting policies are summarized in note 2 to our consolidated financial statements. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions, particularly as they relate to accounting policies that we believe are most important to the presentation of our financial condition and results of operations. We regard an accounting estimate or assumption to be most important to the presentation of our financial condition and results of operations where:

	•		The nature of the estimate or assumption is material due to the level of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change, and

	•		The impact of the estimate or assumption on our financial condition or operating performance is material.

Based on these criteria, we believe the following to be our critical accounting policies:

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

We elected to early adopt SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, as of January 1, 2007. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as “the price that would be received to sell an asset and paid to transfer a liability in an ordinary transaction between market participants at the measurement date”. Additionally, SFAS No. 157 disallows the use of block discounts on positions traded in an active market as well as nullifies certain guidance in Emerging Issues Task Force No. 02-3 regarding the recognition of inception gains on certain derivative transactions. See Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a complete discussion of SFAS No. 157.

Under SFAS No. 157, fair value is generally based on quoted market prices. If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is determined based on other relevant factors, including dealer price quotations, price activity for equivalent instruments and valuation pricing models. Among the factors considered in determining the fair value of financial instruments are discount margins, weighted average spreads, discounted anticipated cash flows, the terms and liquidity of the instrument, the financial condition, operating results and credit ratings of the issuer or underlying company, the quoted market price of publicly traded securities with similar duration and yield, as well as other measurements.

Substantially all of our financial instruments are recorded at fair value or contract amounts that approximate fair value. Financial instruments owned and financial instruments sold, not yet purchased are stated at fair value, with related changes in unrealized appreciation or depreciation reflected in principal transactions, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. Equity interests in certain private equity securities and limited partnership interests are reflected in the consolidated financial statements at fair value, which is often represented at initial cost until significant transactions or developments indicate that a change in the carrying value of the securities is appropriate. This represents our best estimate of exit price as defined by SFAS No. 157. Generally, the carrying values of these securities will be increased based on company performance and in those instances where market values are readily ascertainable by reference to substantial transactions occurring in the marketplace or quoted market prices. Our partnership interests are generally recorded at fair value based on valuations provided by general partners. Financial instruments carried at contract amounts include receivables from clearing brokers, payable to clearing broker, securities purchased under resale agreements, short-term borrowings and securities sold under repurchase agreements.

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax effect of differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period that includes the enactment date.

As of January 1, 2007 we adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, (“FIN 48”), which prescribes a single, comprehensive model for how a company should recognize, measure, present and disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax positions that the company has taken or expects to take on its tax returns. Income tax expense is based on pre-tax accounting income, including adjustments made for the recognition or derecognition related to uncertain tax positions. The recognition or derecognition of income tax expense related to uncertain tax positions is determined as prescribed by FIN 48.

Contractual Obligations

Contractual obligations as of December 31, 2007 are as follows (dollars in thousands):


	Payments due by Period
					2009-		2011-		2013 and
	Total		2008		2010		2012		thereafter
Operating lease obligations	$	119,654	$	12,376	$	28,469	$	28,573	$	50,236

This excludes capital commitments that can be called at any time on private limited partnership interests of $44.3 million, including $11.1 million from an affiliated fund, at December 31, 2007. In addition, the table does not include reserves for income taxes that are not contractual obligations by nature. We cannot determine with any degree of certainty the amount that would be payable or the period of cash settlement to the respective taxing jurisdictions.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We had no material off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2007. However, as described in Item 7A — “Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk — Credit Risk,” through indemnification provisions in our clearing agreements with our clearing brokers, customer activities may expose us to off-balance sheet credit risk, which we seek to mitigate through customer screening and collateral requirements.

We are a member of various exchanges that trade and clear securities or futures contracts. As a member of these exchanges, we may be required to pay a proportionate share of the financial obligations of another member who may default on its obligations to the exchange. To mitigate these performance risks, the exchanges often require members to post collateral as well as meet minimum financial standards. While the rules governing different exchange memberships vary, our guarantee obligations generally would arise only if the exchange had previously exhausted its resources. In addition, any such guarantee obligation would be apportioned among the other non-defaulting members of the exchange. Any potential contingent liability under these membership agreements cannot be estimated. We have not recorded any contingent liability in our consolidated financial statements for these agreements and believe that any potential requirement to make payments under these agreements is remote.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards, Not Yet Adopted

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The election to measure a financial asset or liability at fair value can be made on an instrument-by-instrument basis and is irrevocable. The difference between carrying value and fair value at the election date is recorded as a transition adjustment to opening retained

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Market Risk

Market risk represents the risk of loss that may result from the change in value of a financial instrument due to fluctuations in its market price. Market risk may be exacerbated in times of trading illiquidity when market participants refrain from transacting in normal quantities and/or at normal bid-offer spreads. Our exposure to market risk is directly related to our role as a financial intermediary in customer trading and to our market making and investment activities. Market risk is inherent in financial instruments.

We trade in equity and debt securities as an active participant in both listed and over the counter markets. We typically maintain securities in inventory to facilitate our market making activities and customer order flow. We may use a variety of risk management techniques and hedging strategies in the ordinary course of our trading business to manage our exposures.

In connection with our sales and trading business, management also reviews reports appropriate to the risk profile of specific trading activities. Management monitors risks in its trading activities by establishing limits for each trading desk and reviewing daily trading results, inventory aging, securities concentrations and ratings. Typically, market conditions are evaluated and transaction details and securities positions are reviewed. These activities seek to ensure that trading strategies are within acceptable risk tolerance parameters. Activities include price verification procedures, position reconciliations and reviews of transaction bookings. We believe these procedures, which stress timely communications between traders, trading management and senior management, are important elements of the risk management process.

The following table sets forth our month-end high, low and average long/short financial instruments owned for the year ended December 31, 2007:


	High		Low		Average
	(dollars in thousands)
Long Value:
Equities	$	181,769	$	102,966	$	150,366
Corporate and other debt		323,765		132,498		243,293
U.S. Government and agency securities		45,591		—		10,857
Mortgage backed securities		14,645		—		1,772
Other investments		62,777		41,556		54,164

Short Value:
Equities	$	61,921	$	29,528	$	48,143
Corporate and other debt		9,936		—		3,565
U.S. Government and agency securities		110,057		23,780		61,649
Mortgage backed securities		5,876		—		452

Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate risk represents the potential loss from adverse changes in market interest rates. As we may hold debt securities from time to time, we are exposed to interest rate risk arising from changes in the level and volatility of interest rates and in the shape of the yield curve. Interest rate risk is primarily managed through the use of short positions in U.S. Treasury and corporate debt securities.

Credit Risk

We engage in various securities underwriting, trading and brokerage activities servicing a diverse group of domestic and foreign corporations and institutional investor clients. Our exposure to credit risk associated with the nonperformance of these clients in fulfilling their contractual obligations pursuant to securities transactions can be directly impacted by volatile trading markets which may impair the client’s ability to satisfy its obligations to us. Our principal activities are also subject to the risk of counterparty nonperformance. Pursuant to our Clearing Agreements with Pershing LLC, Pershing Securities Limited and Fortis Securities LLC, we are required to reimburse our clearing broker without limit for any losses incurred due to a counterparty’s failure to satisfy its contractual obligations. In these situations, we may be required to purchase or sell financial instruments at unfavorable market prices to satisfy obligations to other customers or counterparties. We seek to mitigate the risks associated with sales and trading services through active customer screening and selection procedures and through requirements that clients maintain collateral in appropriate amounts where required or deemed necessary.

Inflation Risk

Because our assets are, to a large extent, liquid in nature, they are not significantly affected by inflation. However, the rate of inflation affects such expenses as employee compensation and communications charges, which may not be readily recoverable in the prices of services we offer. To the extent inflation results in rising interest rates and has other adverse effects on the securities markets, it may adversely affect our combined financial condition and results of operations in certain businesses.

Operational Risk

Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events. We are focused on maintaining our overall operational risk management framework and minimizing or mitigating these risks through continual assessment, reporting and monitoring of potential operational risks.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management of KBW, Inc. (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As of December 31, 2007, management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the framework established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based upon this assessment, management has determined that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007 was effective.

The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have material effect on the financial statements.

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm has audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, as stated in its report.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
KBW, Inc.:

We have audited KBW, Inc.’s (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, KBW, Inc. maintained in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements of financial condition of KBW, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
KBW, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of KBW, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of KBW, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), KBW Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 27, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
February 27, 2008

KBW, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
December 31, 2007 and 2006
(Dollars in thousands)


	2007			2006
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	194,358		$	165,647
Financial instruments owned, at fair value:
Equities		102,966			117,285
Corporate and other debt		224,812			135,744
U.S. Government and agency securities		—			15,905
Mortgage backed securities		—			14,645
Other investments		54,515			47,158

		382,293			330,737

Securities purchased under resale agreements		23,846			62,319
Receivables from clearing brokers		191,234			185,712
Accounts receivable		21,196			25,740
Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization of $19,259 in 2007 and $18,297 in 2006		19,801			22,151
Other assets		31,722			12,559

Total assets	$	864,450		$	804,865


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities:
Securities sold under repurchase agreements	$	94,784		$	84,536
Short-term borrowings		65,099			28,500
Financial instruments sold, not yet purchased, at fair value:
Equities		48,061			29,528
Corporate and other debt		5,000			5,082
U.S. Government and agency securities		23,780			76,362

		76,841			110,972

Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities		172,263			166,671
Income taxes payable		7,037			16,772

Total liabilities		416,024			407,451


Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock		—			—
Common stock		293			292
Paid-in capital		114,014			94,419
Retained earnings		337,368			310,076
Notes receivable from stockholders		(5,254	)		(8,843	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		2,005			1,470

Total stockholders’ equity		448,426			397,414

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	864,450		$	804,865

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

KBW Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(Dollars in thousands, except per share information)


	2007			2006		2005
Revenues:
Investment banking	$	226,464		$	210,026	$	149,332
Commissions		165,803			116,625		96,301
Principal transactions, net		(7,520	)		45,773		36,568
Interest and dividend income		37,612			26,920		17,984
Investment advisory fees		1,751			5,036		3,843
Other		3,418			2,206		3,838

Total revenues		427,528			406,586		307,866

Expenses:
Compensation and benefits		257,070			216,518		187,428
Occupancy and equipment		18,722			17,728		16,877
Communications and data processing		24,283			19,465		18,526
Brokerage and clearance		22,967			19,728		17,390
Interest		14,732			11,023		8,105
Business development		16,601			13,218		13,141
Other		23,748			17,257		15,257

Total expenses		378,123			314,937		276,724

Income before income tax expense		49,405			91,649		31,142
Income tax expense		22,113			38,365		13,735

Net income (Note 9)	$	27,292		$	53,284	$	17,407


Earnings per common share (Note 9):
Basic	$	0.89		$	1.94	$	0.64
Diluted	$	0.86		$	1.93	$	0.64

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic		30,654,058			27,512,023		27,194,404
Diluted		31,561,751			27,565,453		27,215,001

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

KBW, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income
Years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(Dollars in thousands, except per share information)


															Notes			Accumulated
												Common			Receivable			Other			Total
	Preferred		Common			Paid-in			Retained			Treasury			from			Comprehensive			Stockholders’
	Stock		Stock			Capital			Earnings			Stock			Stockholders			Income (loss)			Equity
Balance at December 31, 2004	$	—	$	38		$	201,709		$	340,872		$	(254,558	)	$	(19,899	)	$	960		$	269,122
Net income (Note 9)		—		—			—			17,407			—			—			—			17,407
Other comprehensive loss, currency translation adjustment		—		—			—			—			—			—			(1,815	)		(1,815	)

Total comprehensive income		—		—			—			—			—			—			—			15,592

Purchase of 242,520 shares of common stock for treasury		—		—			—			—			(2,564	)		—			—			(2,564	)
Issuance of 6,794 shares of common stock from treasury		—		—			75			—			—			(75	)		—			—
Amortization of stock-based compensation		—		—			1,741			—			—			—			—			1,741
Retirement of 24,613,802 shares of common stock from treasury		—		(32	)		(192,328	)		(64,762	)		257,122			—			—			—
Purchase of 215,301 shares of common stock		—		—			(2,103	)		—			—			621			—			(1,482	)
Issuance of 1,866,286 shares of common stock		—		—			18,285			—			—			(3,897	)		—			14,388
Excess net tax benefit related to delivery of restricted stock units		—		—			31			—			—			—			—			31
Repayment of notes receivable from stockholders		—		—			—			—			—			5,606			—			5,606
Payment to common stockholders		—		—			—			(36,725	)		—			—			—			(36,725	)

Balance at December 31, 2005		—		6			27,410			256,792			—			(17,644	)		(855	)		265,709
Net income (Note 9)		—		—			—			53,284			—			—			—			53,284
Other comprehensive income, currency translation adjustment		—		—			—			—			—			—			2,325			2,325

Total comprehensive income		—		—			—			—			—			—			—			55,609

Purchase of 1,182,328 shares of common stock		—		(12	)		(12,206	)		—			—			1,218			—			(11,000	)
Issuance of 4,122,482 shares of common stock		—		41			76,808			—			—			—			—			76,849
Forty-three for one stock split effective November 1, 2006		—		257			(257	)		—			—			—			—			—
Amortization of stock-based compensation		—		—			3,476			—			—			—			—			3,476
Restricted stock units converted		—		—			(1,175	)		—			—			—			—			(1,175	)
Excess net tax benefit related to delivery of restricted stock units		—		—			363			—			—			—			—			363
Repayment of notes receivable from stockholders		—		—			—			—			—			7,583			—			7,583

Balance at December 31, 2006		—		292			94,419			310,076			—			(8,843	)		1,470			397,414
Net income		—		—			—			27,292			—			—			—			27,292
Other comprehensive income, currency translation adjustment		—		—			—			—			—			—			535			535

Total comprehensive income		—		—			—			—			—			—			—			27,827

Amortization of stock-based compensation		—		—			20,564			—			—			—			—			20,564
Purchase of 79,172 shares of common stock		—		—			(2,170	)		—			—			205			—			(1,965	)
Issuance of 163,244 shares of common stock		—		1			2,641			—			—			—			—			2,642
Restricted stock units converted		—		—			(1,078	)		—			—			—			—			(1,078	)
Stock-based awards vested							(1,564	)														(1,564	)
Excess tax benefit related to delivery of restricted stock units		—		—			1,202			—			—			—			—			1,202
Repayment of notes receivable from stockholders		—		—			—			—			—			3,384			—			3,384

Balance at December 31, 2007	$	—	$	293		$	114,014		$	337,368		$	—		$	(5,254	)	$	2,005		$	448,426

Description of common stock and details:


				Number of Shares
Par Value		December 31,		Authorized		Issued		Outstanding
$	0.01		2007		140,000,000		29,289,013		29,289,013
$	0.01		2006		140,000,000		29,204,941		29,204,941
$	0.01		2005		387,000,000		26,264,787		26,264,787

Description of preferred stock and details:


				Number of Shares
Par Value		December 31,		Authorized		Issued		Outstanding
$	0.01		2007		10,000,000		—		—
$	0.01		2006		10,000,000		—		—
$	0.01		2005		1,000,000		—		—

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

KBW, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(Dollars in thousands)


	2007			2006			2005
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	27,292		$	53,284		$	17,407
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Non-monetary transaction		(6,518	)		—			—
Amortization of stock-based compensation		20,564			3,476			1,741
Depreciation and amortization		4,895			5,906			5,737
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense		(10,125	)		330			(2,845	)
(Increase) decrease in operating assets:
Financial instruments owned, at fair value		(45,038	)		55,899			(121,253	)
Securities purchased under resale agreements		38,473			(18,438	)		21,851
Receivables from clearing brokers		(5,522	)		(94,082	)		40,353
Accounts receivable		4,544			47			(14,315	)
Other assets		(9,038	)		81			5,971
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities:
Financial instruments sold, not yet purchased, at fair value		(34,131	)		13,973			(41,310	)
Securities sold under repurchase agreements		10,248			82,261			(25,540	)
Short-term borrowings		36,599			(35,250	)		63,750
Payable to clearing broker		—			(91,977	)		91,977
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities		5,592			36,285			(1,349	)
Income taxes payable		(9,735	)		6,707			2,482

Net cash provided by operating activities		28,100			18,502			44,657

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements		(2,545	)		(3,442	)		(6,136	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(2,545	)		(3,442	)		(6,136	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Purchase of shares of common stock for treasury		—			—			(2,564	)
Issuance of shares of common stock		—			75,674			18,285
Purchase of shares of common stock		(1,965	)		(11,000	)		(1,482	)
Excess tax benefit related to the delivery of restricted stock units		1,202			363			—
Issuance of notes receivable from stockholders		—			—			(3,897	)
Payment to common stockholders		—			—			(36,725	)
Repayment of notes receivable from stockholders		3,384			7,583			5,606

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		2,621			72,620			(20,777	)

Currency adjustment:
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		535			2,325			(1,815	)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		28,711			90,005			15,929
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year		165,647			75,642			59,713

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year	$	194,358		$	165,647		$	75,642


Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for:
Income taxes	$	47,546		$	29,334		$	7,899
Interest	$	14,800		$	10,743		$	7,570

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

KBW, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except share information)

(1) Organization

Organization and Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of KBW, Inc., and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company”), Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. (“Keefe”), Keefe, Bruyette & Woods Limited (“KBWL”), KBW Asset Management, Inc. (“KBWAM”), and KBW Ventures, Inc. (“Ventures”) and FIG Acquisition Corp. Keefe is a regulatory member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and is principally a broker-dealer in securities and a market-maker in certain financial services stocks and bonds in the United States. KBWL is authorized and regulated by the U.K. Financial Services Authority (“FSA”) and a member of the London Stock Exchange, Euronext, Virt-x and Deutsche Boerse. Keefe’s and KBWL’s customers are predominantly institutional investors including other brokers and dealers, commercial banks, asset managers and other financial institutions. Keefe has clearing arrangements with Pershing LLC and Fortis Securities LLC on a fully disclosed basis. KBWL has a clearing arrangement with Pershing Securities Limited on a fully disclosed basis.

(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(a) Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated.

(b) Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Company’s financial statements and these footnotes including financial instrument valuations, compensation accruals and other matters. Management believes that the estimates used in preparing the Company’s consolidated financial statements are reasonable. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

(c) Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents include investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased. Due to the short-term nature of these instruments, carrying value approximates their fair value.

(d) Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company elected to early adopt SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, as of January 1, 2007. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as “the price that would be received to sell an asset and paid to transfer a liability in an ordinary transaction between market participants at the measurement date”. Additionally, SFAS No. 157 disallows the use of block discounts on positions traded in an active market as well as nullifies certain guidance in Emerging Issues Task Force No. 02-3 regarding the recognition of inception gains on certain derivative transactions. See Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a complete discussion of SFAS No. 157.

KBW, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share information)

Under SFAS No. 157, fair value is generally based on quoted market prices. If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is determined based on other relevant factors, including dealer price quotations, price activity for equivalent instruments and valuation pricing models. Among the factors considered by the Company in determining the fair value of financial instruments are discount margins, credit spreads, discounted anticipated cash flows, the terms and liquidity of the instrument, the financial condition, operating results and credit ratings of the issuer or underlying company, the quoted market price of publicly traded securities with similar duration and yield, as well as other measurements.

Substantially all of the Company’s financial instruments are recorded at fair value or contract amounts that approximate fair value. Financial instruments owned and financial instruments sold, not yet purchased are stated at fair value, with related changes in unrealized appreciation or depreciation reflected in principal transactions, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. Equity interests in certain private equity securities and limited partnership interests are reflected in the consolidated financial statements at fair value. This represents the Company’s best estimate of exit price as defined by SFAS No. 157. Generally, the carrying values of these securities will be determined based on company performance and in those instances where market values are readily ascertainable by reference to substantial transactions occurring in the marketplace or quoted market prices. The Company’s partnership interests are generally recorded at fair value based on valuations provided by general partners. Financial instruments carried at contract amounts include receivables from clearing brokers, payable to clearing broker, securities purchased under resale agreements, short-term borrowings and securities sold under repurchase agreements.

(e) Securities Purchased Under Resale Agreements and Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements

Securities purchased under resale agreements and securities sold under repurchase agreements are accounted for as collateralized financing transactions. The liabilities and assets that result from these agreements are recorded in the consolidated statements of financial condition at the amounts at which the securities were sold or purchased, respectively. It is the policy of the Company to obtain possession of collateral with a market value equal to or in excess of the principal amount loaned under resale agreements. Collateral is valued daily, and the Company may require counterparties to deposit additional collateral or return collateral pledged when appropriate.

The market value of collateral accepted by the Company under resale agreements was $23,795 and $62,237 at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, substantially all of which has been sold or re-pledged. The resale agreements have subsequently been closed out at the contract value.

(f) Receivables From and Payable to Clearing Brokers

Receivables from and payable to clearing brokers include proceeds from securities sold including financial instruments sold not yet purchased, commissions related to securities transactions, margin loans and related interest and deposits with clearing brokers. Proceeds related to financial instruments sold not yet purchased may be restricted until the securities are purchased.

(g) Furniture, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements

Furniture and equipment are carried at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis using estimated useful lives of the related assets, generally two to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a

KBW, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share information)

straight-line basis over the lesser of the economic useful life of the improvement or the term of the respective leases.

(h) Revenue Recognition

Investment Banking

The Company earns fees for underwriting securities offerings, providing strategic advisory services in mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”) and other transactions and arranging private placements, including securitized debt offerings.

	•		Underwriting revenues are recorded, net of related syndicate expenses, at the time the underwriting is completed. In syndicated underwritten transactions, management estimates the Company’s share of transaction-related expenses incurred by the syndicate, and the Company recognizes revenue net of such expense. On final settlement, the Company adjusts these amounts to reflect the actual transaction-related expenses and resulting underwriting fee.

	•		Strategic advisory revenues are recorded when the transactions or the services (or, if applicable, separate components thereof) to be performed are substantially complete, the fees are determinable and collection is reasonably assured.

	•		Private placement revenues are recorded when the services related to the underlying transaction are completed under the terms of the engagement. This is generally the closing date of the transaction.

Since the Company’s investment banking revenues are generally recognized at the time of completion of each transaction or the services to be performed, these revenues typically vary between periods and may be considerably affected by the timing of the closing of significant transactions.

Commissions

The Company’s sales and trading business generates revenue from equity securities trading commissions paid by institutional investor customers. Commissions are recognized on a trade date basis.

Principal transactions

Financial instruments owned, at fair value and financial instruments sold, not yet purchased, at fair value are recorded on a trade-date basis with realized and unrealized gains and losses reflected in principal transactions, net in the consolidated statements of income.

Interest and dividend income

The Company recognizes contractual interest on financial instruments owned at fair value on an accrual basis as a component of interest and dividend income.

(i) Securitization Activities

KBW, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share information)

The Company has transactional activities with trusts established for its structured finance products. The Company may temporarily warehouse securities and occasionally sells capital securities to the trusts. In accordance with SFAS No. 140, the Company recognizes transfers of these warehouse securities as sales, provided control has been relinquished. Control is considered to be relinquished only when all of the following conditions have been met: (i) the assets have been isolated from the transferor, even in bankruptcy or other receivership (true-sale opinions are obtained); (ii) the transferee has the right to pledge or exchange the assets received; and (iii) the transferor has not maintained effective control over the transferred assets (e.g. a unilateral ability to repurchase a unique or specific asset).

(j) Stock-Based Compensation

On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) Share-Based Payments (“SFAS 123(R)”), using the modified prospective method, which requires measurement of compensation cost for all stock-based awards at fair value on the date of grant and recognition of compensation expense over the requisite service period. Expenses associated with such grants are generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, net of estimated forfeitures. Stock-based awards that do not require future service (i.e. vested awards, including awards granted to retirement eligible employees) are expensed immediately on the date of grant. Stock-based awards granted to employees who will become retirement-eligible prior to vesting are expensed ratably from the grant date to the retirement eligibility date.

(k) Income Taxes

As of January 1, 2007 the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, (“FIN 48”), which prescribes a single, comprehensive model for how a company should recognize, measure, present and disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax positions that the company has taken or expects to take on its tax returns. Income tax expense is based on pre-tax accounting income, including adjustments made for the recognition or derecognition related to uncertain tax positions. The recognition or derecognition of income tax expense related to uncertain tax positions is determined as prescribed by FIN 48.

(l) Earnings Per Share (“EPS”)

Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares. The weighted average number of common shares outstanding include restricted stock units (“RSUs”) for which no future service is required as a condition to the delivery of the underlying common stock. Diluted EPS includes the determinants of basic EPS and, in addition, give effect to dilutive potential common shares related to stock compensation plans.

In connection with the initial public offering (“IPO”), the Company completed a 43 for 1 stock split in the form of a dividend on November 1, 2006 on all then outstanding shares. All references to number of shares and restricted stock units and per share amounts in these consolidated financial statements and

KBW, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share information)

accompanying notes have been adjusted to reflect the stock split on a retroactive basis as if such stock split had occurred on January 1, 2004.

(m) Foreign Currency Translation

The Company translates the statements of financial condition of KBWL at the exchange rates in effect at the end of the period. The consolidated statements of income are translated at the average rates of exchange during the year. The resulting translation adjustments of KBWL are recorded directly to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity.

(n) Contributions

Contributions are recorded when the conditions on which they depend are substantially met in accordance with SFAS No. 116, Accounting For Contributions Received and Contributions Made.

(o) Reclassifications

Certain amounts from prior years have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. The Company made certain immaterial prior period reclassifications relating to the tax impact on currency translation adjustments. In connection with the adoption of SFAS No. 157 in the first quarter of 2007, the Company reclassified “Securities not readily marketable, at fair value” to “Financial instruments owned, at fair value” and reclassified “Net gain on investments” to “Principal transactions, net”.

(3) Financial Instruments

The Company elected to early adopt SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, as of January 1, 2007. SFAS No. 157 applies to all financial instruments that are being measured and reported on a fair value basis. This includes those items currently reported in financial instruments owned, at fair value and financial instruments sold, not yet purchased, at fair value on the consolidated statements of financial condition.

As defined in SFAS No. 157, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In determining fair value, the Company uses various methods including market, income and cost approaches. Based on these approaches, the Company utilizes assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and or the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated, or generally unobservable firm inputs. The Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Based on the observability of the inputs used in the valuation techniques the Company is required to provide the following information according to the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. Financial instrument assets and liabilities carried at fair value have been classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:


Level 1		Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2		Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
Level 3		Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

KBW, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share information)

Level 1 primarily consists of financial instruments whose value is based on quoted market prices such as listed equities. Additionally, this category also includes U.S. Government and agency securities for which the Company typically receives independent external valuation information.

Level 2 includes those financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies calibrated to observable market inputs. These models are primarily industry-standard models that consider various assumptions, including discount margins, credit spreads, discounted anticipated cash flows, the terms and liquidity of the instrument, the financial condition, operating results and credit ratings of the issuer or underlying company, the quoted market price of publicly traded securities with similar duration and yield, time value, yield curve, default rates, as well as other measurements. In order to be classified as Level 2, substantially all of these assumptions would need to be observable in the marketplace or can be derived from observable data or supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace. Financial instruments in this category include certain corporate and other debt, including investment grade pooled trust preferred securities primarily backed by banks and insurance companies, and certain restricted stock.

Level 3 is comprised of financial instruments whose fair value is estimated based on internally developed models or methodologies utilizing significant inputs that are unobservable from objective sources. Included in this category are certain corporate and other debt, including certain collateralized debt obligations (“CDO”) primarily backed by banks and insurance companies and trust preferred securities held for PreTSL™ securitizations, private equity securities and limited and general partnership interests.

In determining the appropriate levels, the Company performed a detailed analysis of the assets and liabilities that are subject to SFAS No. 157. At each reporting period, all assets and liabilities for which the fair value measurement is based on significant unobservable inputs are classified as Level 3.

KBW, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share information)

Assets at Fair Value as of December 31, 2007


	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Financial instruments owned, at fair value:
Equities	$	76,581	$	2,741	$	23,541	$	102,863
Corporate and other debt		—	$	131,052	$	93,760	$	224,812
Other Investments		—		—		54,515		54,515

Total non derivative trading assets		76,581		133,793		171,816		382,190
Derivative financial instruments		103		—		—		103

Total Assets at Fair Value	$	76,684	$	133,793	$	171,816	$	382,293

Liabilities at Fair Value as of December 31, 2007


	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Financial instruments sold, but not yet purchased, at fair value:
Equities	$	47,983	$	—	$	—	$	47,983
Corporate and other debt		—		5,000		—		5,000
U.S. Government and agency securities		23,780		—		—		23,780

Total non derivative trading liabilities		71,763		5,000		—		76,763
Derivative financial instruments		78		—		—		78

Total financial instruments sold, not yet purchased	$	71,841	$	5,000	$	—	$	76,841

The non-derivative trading assets category includes securities such as listed equities, U.S. Treasuries, other U.S. Government and agency securities, corporate and other debt, limited and general partnership interests and private equity securities. They are reported in financial instruments owned, at fair value and financial instruments sold, not yet purchased, at fair value on the consolidated statements of financial condition.

The derivative financial instruments are reported on a gross basis by level. The Company’s derivative activities included in financial instruments owned and financial instruments sold, not yet purchased consist of writing and purchasing listed equity options. The fair value of the individual derivative contracts were reported gross in their respective levels based on the fair value hierarchy.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the non-derivative trading assets measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007:

Changes in unrealized

Total gains

gains and (losses)

Balance as of

and (losses)

Transfers

Balance as of

included in earnings

December 31,

(realized and

Purchases/

in/(out) of Level

December 31,

related to assets still

2006

unrealized)

(sales), net

2007

held at reporting date

Non-derivative trading assets

56,227

($2,388

)

23,832

94,145

171,816

$1,814

KBW, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share information)

Total gains and losses represent the total gains and/or losses (realized and unrealized) recorded for the Level 3 assets and are reported in principal transactions, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. Additionally, the change in the unrealized gains and losses were often offset by realized gains and losses during the period.

Purchases/sales represent the net amount of Level 3 assets that were either purchased or sold during the period. The amounts were recorded at their end of period fair values.

Net transfers in/out of Level 3 represent existing financial assets that were previously categorized at a higher level. Transfers into or out of Level 3 result from changes in the observability of fair value inputs used in determining fair values for different types of financial assets. Transfers are reported at their fair value as of the beginning of the month in which such changes in the fair value inputs occurs. During the fourth quarter of 2007 significant transfers into Level 3 resulted from the significant widening of credit spreads and lack of liquidity in certain debt markets. The fourth quarter Level 3 transfers substantially were trust preferred and other capital securities issued primarily by banks and insurance companies held for securitization and certain CDO securities backed by such securities. There were no other CDO securities, including those collateralized by mortgage loans, held in any period presented herein.

The amount of unrealized gains and losses included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains and losses relating to Level 3 assets still held at the end of the period were reported in principal transactions, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. The change in unrealized gains and losses were often offset, at least in part, by realized gains and losses during the period.

(4) Short-Term Borrowings

The Company obtains secured short-term borrowings primarily through bank loans. The short-term borrowings average balances for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 were $43,886 and $54,500, respectively. Secured short-term borrowings were $65,099 at the rate in effect of 3.81% as of December 31, 2007, and $28,500 at the rate in effect of 5.92% as of December 31, 2006, respectively. Included in financial instruments owned as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 were $83,750 and $38,000, respectively, of corporate bonds in which the lender has a security interest in connection with short-term borrowings.

(5) Commitments and Contingencies

(a) Leases

The Company leases its headquarters and other office locations under non-cancelable lease agreements which expire between 2008 and 2016. Such agreements contain escalation clauses and provide that certain operating costs be paid by the Company in addition to the minimum rentals. As part of a lease agreement the Company provided a letter of credit in the amount of $3,698.

KBW, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share information)

Future minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2007 are as follows:


	Lease payments
Year:
2008	$	12,376
2009		14,312
2010		14,157
2011		14,083
2012		14,490
Thereafter		50,236

Total	$	119,654

Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 aggregated $11,238, $11,510 and $11,234, respectively.

(b) Litigation

In the ordinary course of business, the Company may be a defendant or codefendant in legal actions. At December 31, 2007, the Company believes, based on currently available information, that the results of such proceedings, in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition. The results of such proceedings could be material to the Company’s operating results for any particular period, depending, in part, upon additional developments affecting such matters and the operating results for such period. Legal reserves have been established in accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies. Once established, reserves are adjusted when there is more information available or when an event occurs requiring a change.

(c) Limited Partnership Commitments

As of December 31, 2007, the Company had approximately $44,261, including $11,113 from an affiliated fund, in outstanding commitments for additional funding to limited partnership investments.

(6) Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk

In the normal course of its proprietary trading activities, the Company enters into transactions in financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk. These financial instruments, primarily options, contain off-balance-sheet risk inasmuch as ultimate settlement of these transactions may have market and/or credit risk in excess of amounts which are recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Transactions in listed options are conducted through regulated exchanges, which clear and guarantee performance of counterparties.

Also in connection with its proprietary trading activities, the Company has sold securities that it does not currently own and will, therefore, be obligated to purchase such securities at a future date. The Company has recorded this obligation in the financial statements at market values of the related securities and will record a trading loss if the market value of the securities increases subsequent to the consolidated financial statements date.

KBW, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share information)

(a) Broker-Dealer Activities

The Company clears securities transactions on behalf of customers through its clearing brokers. In connection with these activities, customers’ unsettled trades may expose the Company to off-balance-sheet credit risk in the event customers are unable to fulfill their contracted obligations. The Company seeks to control the risk associated with its customer activities by monitoring the creditworthiness of its customers.

(b) Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company’s derivative activities consist of writing and purchasing listed equity options and futures on interest rate and currency products for trading purposes and are included in financial instruments owned, at fair value and financial instruments sold, not yet purchased, at fair value in the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition. As a writer of options, the Company receives a cash premium at the beginning of the contract period and bears the risk of unfavorable changes in the value of the financial instruments underlying the options. Options written do not expose the Company to credit risk since they obligate the Company (not its counterparty) to perform.

In order to measure derivative activity, notional or contract amounts are frequently utilized. Notional contract amounts, which are not included on the consolidated statements of financial condition, are used as a basis to calculate contractual cash flows to be exchanged and generally are not actually paid or received.

A summary of the Company’s listed options and futures contracts is as follows:


	Current				End of
	notional		Average fair		period fair
	value		value		value
December 31, 2007:
Purchased options	$	1,100	$	101	$	103
Written options	$	2,600	$	100	$	78
Short futures contracts	$	3,923	$	—	$	—

December 31, 2006:
Purchased options	$	500	$	92	$	160
Written options	$	400	$	87	$	5
Short futures contracts	$	2,375	$	—	$	—

(7) Concentrations of Credit Risk

The Company is engaged in various securities trading and brokerage activities servicing primarily domestic and foreign institutional investors. Nearly all of the Company’s transactions are executed with and on behalf of institutional investors, including other brokers and dealers, commercial banks, mutual funds, and other financial institutions. The Company’s exposure to credit risk associated with the nonperformance of these customers in fulfilling their contractual obligations pursuant to securities transactions can be directly impacted by volatile securities markets.

A substantial portion of the Company’s marketable securities are common stock and debt of financial institutions. The credit and/or market risk associated with these holdings can be directly

KBW, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share information)

impacted by factors that affect this industry such as volatile equity and credit markets and actions of regulatory authorities.

(8) Notes Receivable from Stockholders

Notes receivable from stockholders represent full recourse notes issued to employees for their purchases of stock acquired pursuant to the Company’s book value stock purchase plan. Loans are payable in annual installments and bear interest between 2.7 % and 5.0 % per annum.

(9) Common Stock

Prior to the completion of the IPO and termination of the 2005 Amended and Restated Stockholders’ Agreement, common stock was considered mandatorily redeemable and the amounts classified as stockholders’ equity were previously classified as a liability captioned as mandatorily redeemable common stock. Amounts classified as net income were previously classified as net income available to mandatorily redeemable common stockholders. Earnings per share were previously classified as net income available to mandatorily redeemable common stockholders per share.

(10) Securitization Activities

The Company has transactional activities with trusts relating to its structured finance products known as PreTSLs™. PreTSLs™ are collateralized debt obligations that are typically backed by a combination of capital securities issued by banks and insurance companies. The Company’s primary role as it relates to its PreTSL™ product is to act as structuring and placement agent, broker and market maker. Fees associated with securitizations are reflected in investment banking in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. The Company may temporarily warehouse securities and occasionally sells capital securities to the trusts, generally at par. The Company does not maintain effective control over these assets upon sale to the trusts. The Company sold $150,500 and $318,500 of capital securities to trusts during 2007 and 2006, respectively. The aggregate amount with respect to these structured transactions in which the Company participated in was in excess of $2,600,000 and $4,899,000 during 2007 and 2006, respectively.

(11) Non-Monetary Transaction

The Company received cash and warrants exercisable in common stock as advisory fees in connection with the closing of a private placement transaction. The warrants received were measured at fair value on the closing date of the transaction. The Company recorded investment banking revenues of $6,518 as a result of this non-monetary transaction for the year ended December 31, 2007. Shortly after the closing of the private placement transaction, the Company exercised these warrants and received common stock.

(12) Stock-Based Compensation

At December 31, 2007, the Company had two types of stock-based compensation arrangements: the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) and restricted stock units (“RSUs”).

2006 Equity Incentive Plan: The Plan permits the granting of up to 6,150,000 shares of common stock. Restricted stock awards (“RSAs”) have been granted under the Plan, primarily in connection with the Company’s regular compensation and hiring process and its IPO in 2006. Each RSA is one actual share of common stock issued at no cost to the participant and is restricted. RSAs generally vest ratably

KBW, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share information)

over a three or four year period from the grant date. Vesting would accelerate on a change in control, death or permanent disability. Unvested RSAs are subject to forfeiture upon termination of employment or retirement. There have been no modifications in terms with respect to RSAs granted.

The following tables set forth activity and related weighted average grant date fair value of the Company’s RSAs awarded under the Plan as of December 31, 2007:


				Weighted Average
	Year Ended			Grant Date Fair
	December 31, 2007			Value
Restricted stock awards:
Balance, beginning of year		2,592,100		$	21.00
Grants		626,393		$	31.10
Forfeited		(144,643	)	$	21.66
Vested		(50,025	)	$	31.26

Balance, end of year		3,023,825		$	22.89


	Year Ended December 31,
	2007			2006			2005
Restricted stock awards:
Balance, beginning of year		2,592,100			—			—
Grants		626,393			2,592,200			—
Forfeited		(144,643	)		(100	)		—
Vested		(50,025	)		—			—

Balance, end of year		3,023,825			2,592,100

During 2007 and 2006, the Company granted 626,393 and 2,592,200, respectively, of RSAs at a total fair value of $19,481 and $54,436, respectively. No RSAs were granted in 2005. The total fair value of RSAs vested in 2007 was $1,564. No RSAs vested prior to 2007.

Compensation expense equivalent to the grant date fair value per share is recognized by the Company over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period. Compensation expense recognized related to the granting of RSAs for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $20,135 and $1,882, respectively.

Restricted Stock Units: Prior to the adoption of the Plan, RSUs were authorized and granted pursuant to commitments made in connection with employment of certain employees. Each RSU represents the right to receive one share of common stock at no cost to the employee and generally vests ratably over a three-year period from the grant date. Vesting would accelerate on a change in control, death or permanent disability. Upon vesting, RSUs can be converted into common stock unless conversion is deferred by the employee. Unvested RSUs are subject to forfeiture upon termination of employment. There have been no modifications in terms with respect to RSUs granted.

The following tables set forth activity relating to the Company’s RSUs s of December 31, 2007:

KBW, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share information)


	Year Ended						Weighted Average
	December 31, 2007						Grant Date Fair Value
	Future			No Future			Future		No Future
	Service			Service			Service		Service
	Required			Required			Required		Required
Restricted stock units:
Balance, beginning of year		109,693			1,439,855		$	10.32	$	6.76
Vested		(105,995	)		105,995			10.33		10.33
Converted and redeemed		—			(113,219	)		—		9.52

Balance, end of year *		3,698			1,432,631		$	9.98	$	6.80


*		The balance of RSU’s with respect to future service required at December 31, 2007 will vest in 2008.


	Year Ended December 31,
	2007			2006			2005
Restricted stock units:
Balance, beginning of year		1,549,548			1,751,003			1,751,003
Grants		—			3,698			—
Forfeited		—			—			—
Converted and redeemed		(113,219	)		(205,153	)		—

Balance, end of year		1,436,329			1,549,548			1,751,003

RSUs were not granted in 2007 and 2005. During 2006, the Company granted 3,698 of RSUs at a total fair value of $37. The total fair value of RSUs vested in 2007 was $1,095. The fair value of RSUs converted and redeemed in 2007 was $1,078. Compensation expense equivalent to the grant date fair value is recognized by the Company over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period. Associated compensation expense recognized was $429, $1,594 and $1,741 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

At December 31, 2007, the compensation cost related to the unvested RSUs and RSAs was $10 and $48,766, respectively, which will be recognized in future years, primarily 2008, 2009, and 2010. The weighted average period related to these stock compensation expenses yet to be recognized was 0.6 years for RSUs and 1.9 years for RSAs.

In order to satisfy the redemption of RSUs and the delivery of RSAs, the Company may issue shares from previously un-issued shares.

Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), we presented all tax benefits resulting from share-based compensation as cash flows from operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows. SFAS 123(R) requires cash flows resulting from tax deductions in excess of the grant-date fair value of share-based awards to be included in cash flows from financing activities. Accordingly, we reflected the excess tax benefit of $1,202 and $363 related to share-based compensation in cash flows from financing activities in 2007 and 2006, respectively.

(13) Employee Profit-Sharing and Retirement Plan

The Company has a defined contribution profit-sharing and retirement plan (the “Retirement Plan”) covering employees who meet certain eligibility requirements. Contributions are generally funded

KBW, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share information)

annually. The Company’s profit sharing contribution to the Retirement Plan, which is voluntary, was $2,941, $5,038 and $4,392, in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and is included in compensation and benefits expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. The Retirement Plan also contains a 401(k) portion covering substantially all employees. Employees are permitted within limitations imposed by tax law to make pre-tax contributions to the 401(k) portion. The Company’s contribution to the 401(k) portion of the Retirement Plan is determined based on three percent of employees’ total compensation. The 401(k) portion expense, which is included in employee compensation and benefits expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of income, was $2,196, $1,869 and $1,343, for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

(14) Earnings Per Share

The computations of basic and diluted earnings per share are set forth below:


	Years Ended December 31,
	2007		2006		2005

Numerator for basic and diluted EPS — net income (Note 9)	$	27,292	$	53,284	$	17,407


Denominator for EPS — weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic		30,654,058		27,512,023		27,194,404
Effect of dilutive securities — restricted stock		907,693		53,430		20,597

Diluted		31,561,751		27,565,453		27,215,001


Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.89	$	1.94	$	0.64
Diluted	$	0.86	$	1.93	$	0.64

KBW, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share information)

(15) Income Taxes

Income taxes included in the consolidated statements of income represent the following:


	Current		Deferred			Total
Year ended December 31, 2007
U.S. Federal	$	22,359	$	(6,909	)	$	15,450
State and Local		8,475		(2,505	)		5,970
Non-U.S.		1,404		(711	)		693

	$	32,238	$	(10,125	)	$	22,113


Year ended December 31, 2006
U.S. Federal	$	26,400	$	590		$	26,990
State and Local		10,560		260			10,820
Non-U.S.		1,075		(520	)		555

	$	38,035	$	330		$	38,365


Year ended December 31, 2005
U.S. Federal	$	10,633	$	(1,646	)	$	8,987
State and Local		5,019		(731	)		4,288
Non-U.S.		928		(468	)		460

	$	16,580	$	(2,845	)	$	13,735

The difference between the statutory federal tax rate of 35% and the effective tax rate is summarized below:


	2007						2006						2005
				Percentage						Percentage						Percentage
				of Pretax						of Pretax						of Pretax
	Amount			Earnings			Amount			Earnings			Amount			Earnings
Computed “expected” tax provision	$	17,292			35.0	%	$	32,077			35.0	%	$	10,900			35.0	%
Non-U.S. tax rate differential		(70	)		(0.1	)		(80	)		(0.1	)		(66	)		(0.2	)
State and local taxes, net of related Federal income tax benefit		3,881			7.9			7,033			7.7			2,796			9.0
Permanent differences		1,010			2.0			(665	)		(0.7	)		105			0.3

	$	22,113			44.8	%	$	38,365			41.9	%	$	13,735			44.1	%

The provision for income taxes resulted in effective tax rates of 44.8%, 41.9% and 44.1% for 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The increase in the effective rate in 2007 compared to 2006 was primarily due to a reduction in the level of pre-tax earnings which increased the impact of certain permanent differences. The decrease in the effective rate from 2006 compared to 2005 was due to a relative reduction in state and local tax expense.

Income tax benefits related to employee stock compensation plans of $1,202, $363 and $31 in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, were allocated to additional paid-in capital.

KBW, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share information)

Deferred income taxes are provided for the differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements. Net deferred tax assets are included in other assets in the consolidated statement of financial condition.

The effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:


	2007			2006
Deferred tax assets:
Employee compensation and benefits	$	13,257		$	5,768
Legal contingencies		298			484
Other		158			—

Total deferred tax assets		13,713			6,252


Deferred tax liabilities:
Accumulated depreciation and amortization of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements		(849	)		(1,561	)
Financial instruments owned, at fair value		(1,818	)		(3,785	)


Total deferred tax liabilities		(2,667	)		(5,346	)

Net deferred tax assets	$	11,046		$	906

The Company has permanently reinvested earnings in its foreign subsidiary. At December 31, 2007, $2,651 of accumulated earnings were permanently reinvested. At current tax rates, additional Federal income taxes (net of available tax credits) of approximately $189 would become payable if such income were to be repatriated.

Management believes that realization of the deferred tax assets is more likely than not based on the reversal of temporary differences and anticipated future taxable income. There are no valuation allowances recorded against deferred tax assets at December 31, 2007 and 2006.

Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48. FIN 48 prescribes the recognition and measurement criteria related to tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The Company had no cumulative effect of adopting FIN 48, and therefore, no adjustment was recorded to retained earnings upon such adoption.

The Company had unrecognized tax benefits including interest of approximately $5,801 as of January 1, 2007 and approximately $6,492 as of December 31, 2007, all of which, if recognized, would affect the rate. It is unlikely that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within the next twelve months. The unrecognized tax benefits consist of the following components.

KBW, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share information)


	Amount
Balance as of January 1, 2007	$	5,801
Additions based upon current year tax positions		644
Additions for prior years tax positions		334
Reductions for prior years tax positions		(65	)
Settlements		(222	)

Balance as of December 31, 2007	$	6,492

The Company’s historical accounting policy with respect to interest and penalties related to tax uncertainties has been to classify these amounts as income taxes, and the Company continued this classification upon the adoption of FIN 48. The total amount of interest related to tax uncertainties recognized in the statement of income for the period ended December 31, 2007 was $333. The total amount of accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions is $508 as of January 1, 2007 and $841 as of December 31, 2007 and is included in total unrecognized tax benefits described above.

The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state, local and foreign jurisdictions.

For federal tax purposes, years beginning after 2004 are still open to examination. For state and local tax purposes, years beginning after 2003 are still open to examination in all state and local jurisdictions, except New York State. The New York State return is currently under exam for the 2002-2004 tax years. The Company believes that it is reasonably possible that this examination will be settled by 2009. Further, it is not anticipated that the unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change over the next twelve months.

(16) Industry Segment Data

The Company follows the provisions of SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, in disclosing its business segments. Pursuant to that statement, an entity is required to determine its business segments based on the way management organizes the segments within the enterprise for making operating decisions and assessing performance. Based upon these criteria, the Company has determined that its entire business should be considered a single segment. There were no individual customers which contributed more than 10% to the Company’s total revenues.

(17) Recent Accounting Developments

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The election to measure a financial asset or liability at fair value can be made on an instrument-by-instrument basis and is irrevocable. The difference between carrying value and fair value at the election date is recorded as a transition adjustment to opening retained earnings. Subsequent changes in fair value are recognized in earnings. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 159 on January 1, 2008 and does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

KBW, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share information)

(18) Net Capital Requirement

Keefe is a registered U.S. broker-dealer that is subject to the Uniform Net Capital Rule (SEC Rule 15c3-1 or the Net Capital Rule) administered by the SEC and FINRA, which requires the maintenance of minimum net capital. Keefe has elected to use the basic method to compute net capital as permitted by the Net Capital Rule, which requires Keefe to maintain minimum net capital, as defined, of $9,382 as of December 31, 2007. These rules also require Keefe to notify and sometimes obtain approval from FINRA for significant withdrawals of capital.


	December 31, 2007
Net Capital	$	100,302
Excess net capital	$	90,920

KBWL is an investment firm authorized and regulated by the FSA in the United Kingdom and is subject to the capital requirements of the FSA. As of December 31, 2007, KBWL was in compliance with its local capital adequacy requirements. At December 31, 2007, KBWL’s financial resources of approximately $40,400 exceeded the financial resources requirement by approximately $33,000.

(19) Selected Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)

The following tables summarize the quarterly statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006:

2007


	First		Second		Third		Fourth
Revenues	$	101,279	$	119,752	$	101,135	$	105,362
Net Income	$	7,720	$	10,395	$	5,535	$	3,642

*Earnings per share ():**
Basic	$	0.25	$	0.34	$	0.18	$	0.12
Diluted	$	0.24	$	0.33	$	0.18	$	0.11

Average shares outstanding:
Basic		30,640,736		30,603,734		30,665,945		30,704,979
Diluted		31,525,629		31,543,189		31,546,276		31,734,882

2006


	First		Second		Third		Fourth
Revenues	$	101,438	$	91,708	$	93,212	$	120,229
Net Income	$	10,156	$	8,394	$	9,310	$	25,424

*Earnings per share ():**
Basic	$	0.37	$	0.31	$	0.35	$	0.88
Diluted	$	0.37	$	0.31	$	0.35	$	0.87

Average shares outstanding:
Basic		27,386,872		26,917,398		26,749,483		28,991,535
Diluted		27,412,199		26,917,398		26,749,483		29,363,999


Item 9.		*Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.*

None.


Item 9A.		*Controls and Procedures.*

Our management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer (our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively), evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed or submitted by us under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in such reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting and the attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm are contained in Part II, Item 8 of this report and are incorporated herein by reference.


Item 9B.		*Other Information.*

None.

PART III


Item 10.		*Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.*

Information with respect to this item will be contained in the Proxy Statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is incorporated herein by reference.


Item 11.		*Executive Compensation.*

Information with respect to this item will be contained in the Proxy Statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is incorporated herein by reference.


Item 12.		*Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.*

Information with respect to this item will be contained in the Proxy Statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is incorporated herein by reference.


Item 13.		*Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence.*

Information with respect to this item will be contained in the Proxy Statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is incorporated herein by reference.


Item 14.		*Principal Accountant Fees and Services.*

Information with respect to this item will be contained in the Proxy Statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is incorporated herein by reference.

PART IV


Item 15.		*Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules*

(a) Documents filed as part of this Form 10-K:

1. Consolidated Financial Statements

The consolidated financial statements required to be filed in the Form 10-K are listed on the pages below. The required financial statements appear on pages 55 through 77 herein.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting		51
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		52
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2007 and 2006		55
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005		56
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005		57
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005		58
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		59

2. Financial Statement Schedules

Separate financial statement schedules have been omitted either because they are not applicable or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements.

3. Exhibits

See the Exhibit Index beginning on page E-1 for a list of the exhibits being filed or furnished with or incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: February 27, 2008


KBW, INC.
By:	/s/ John G. Duffy
	Name:	John G. Duffy
	Title:	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the date indicated.

Date: February 27, 2008


Signature		Title

/s/ John G. Duffy John G. Duffy		Director, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)

/s/ Robert Giambrone Robert Giambrone		Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)

/s/ Andrew M. Senchak Andrew M. Senchak		Director

/s/ Thomas B. Michaud Thomas B. Michaud		Director

/s/ Daniel M. Healy Daniel M. Healy		Director

/s/ Christopher M. Condron Christopher M. Condron		Director

/s/ James K.Schmidt James K. Schmidt		Director

/s/ Michael J. Zimmerman Michael J. Zimmerman		Director

EXHIBIT INDEX


3 .1		Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of KBW, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q with respect to the quarter ended September 30, 2007 filed on November 13, 2007).

3.2		Amended and Restated Bylaws of KBW, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q with respect to the quarter ended September 30, 2006 filed on December 15, 2006).

4.1		Specimen Common Stock Certificate of KBW, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1/A (No. 333-136509) filed on September 28, 2006).

4.2		Second Amended and Restated Stockholders’ Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q with respect to the quarter ended September 30, 2006 filed on December 15, 2006).

10.1†		KBW, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q with respect to the quarter ended September 30, 2006 filed on December 15, 2006).

10.2		Fully Disclosed Clearing Agreement, dated as of October 22, 1992, between Pershing LLC and Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc., as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1/A (No. 333-136509) filed on September 28, 2006).

10.3		Fully Disclosed Clearing Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2005, between Fortis Securities LLC and Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1/A (No. 333-136509) filed on September 28, 2006).

10.4		Agreement of Lease, dated November 12, 2002, between the Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, ELAS Securities Acquisition Corp. and Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1/A (No. 333-136509) filed on September 28, 2006).

10.5		First Amendment to Lease, dated September 6, 2003, between the Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, ELAS Securities Acquisition Corp. and Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1/A (No. 333-136509) filed on September 28, 2006).

10.6		Second Amendment to Lease, dated September 6, 2004, between the Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, ELAS Securities Acquisition Corp. and Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1/A (No. 333-136509) filed on September 28, 2006).

10.7†		KBW, Inc. Annual Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q with respect to the quarter ended September 30, 2006 filed on December 15, 2006).

10.8†		Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Awards under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan in connection with the IPO (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K with respect to the year ended December 31, 2006, filed on March 30, 2007).

10.9		Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for February 2007 awards under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K with respect to the year ended December 31, 2006, filed on March 30, 2007).

10.10*†		Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for February 2008 awards under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan.

E-1


10.11†		Employment Agreement with John G. Duffy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s quarterly report with respect to the quarter ended September 30, 2006 on Form 10-Q filed on December 15, 2006).

10.12†		Employment Agreement with Thomas B. Michaud (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s quarterly report with respect to the quarter ended September 30, 2006 on Form 10-Q filed on December 15, 2006).

10.13†		Employment Agreement with Andrew M. Senchak (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s quarterly report with respect to the quarter ended September 30, 2006 on Form 10-Q filed on December 15, 2006).

10.14		Sublease between Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. and National Financial Partners Corp., dated as of August 31, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, filed on September 7, 2007).

10.15*†		Change in Control Agreement with Robert Giambrone, dated February 1, 2008.

10.16*†		Change in Control Agreement with Mitchell B. Kleinman, dated February 1, 2008.

11		Statement regarding computation of per share earnings. (The calculation of per share earnings is in Part II, Item 8, Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Earnings Per Share) and is omitted here in accordance with Section(b)(11) of Item 601 of Regulation S-K).

21.1		List of Subsidiaries of KBW, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1/A (No. 333-136509) filed on August 11, 2006).

23.1*		Consent of KPMG LLP.

31.1*		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2*		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


†		Indicates a management contract or compensatory arrangement

*		Filed herewith

E-2


PART I
Item 1.	Business	1
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	12
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	25
Item 2.	Properties	25
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	25
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	26

PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	27
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	28
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	30
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	48
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	50
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	78
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	78
Item 9B.	Other Information	78

PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	78
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	78
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	78
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	79
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	79

PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	79
Signatures		80
Exhibit Index		E-1
EX-10.10: FORM OF RESTRICTIVE STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT
EX-10.15: CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT
EX-10.16: CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT
EX-23.1: CONSENT OF KPMG LLP
EX-31.1: CERTIFICATION
EX-31.2: CERTIFICATION
EX-32.1: CERTIFICATION
EX-32.2: CERTIFICATION


	Page
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.		51
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.		52
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2007 and 2006.		55
Consolidated Statements of Income for Each of the Years in the Three-Year Period Ended December 31, 2007.		56
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for Each of the Years in the Three-Year Period Ended December 31, 2007.		57
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Each of the Years in the Three-Year Period Ended December 31, 2007.		58
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.		59


*		Summation of the quarters’ earnings per share may not equal the annual amounts due to the averaging effect of the number of shares outstanding throughout each respective year.