Note B - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2014

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]

NOTE B — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Consolidation: The financial statements include the accounts of the Company, our wholly-owned subsidiary Iso-Torque Corporation, and our majority-owned subsidiary, Ice Surface Development, Inc. (56% owned at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013). As of June 30, 2014, each of the subsidiaries is non-operational. We are intending to let Ice Surface Development, Inc. dissolve by proclamation. All material intercompany transactions and account balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Such estimates are used in valuing the useful lives of any intangible assets and the future realizable value of such assets. These estimates are subject to a high degree of judgment and potential change. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications: Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year balances to conform to the current year’s presentation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents may include time deposits, certificates of deposit, and highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less. We maintain cash and cash equivalents at financial institutions which periodically may exceed federally insured amounts.

Accounts Receivable: We carry our accounts receivable at invoice amount less an allowance for doubtful accounts.  On a periodic basis, we evaluate our accounts receivable and establish an allowance for doubtful accounts, based on a history of past write-offs and collections and current credit conditions.  We do not accrue interest on past due invoices.  There was $0 allowance for doubtful accounts as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, as determined by management.

Inventories: Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined under the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. We record provisions for excess, obsolete or slow-moving inventory based on changes in customer demand, technology developments or other economic factors. There was a $24,000 and $26,000 provision for excess, obsolete or slow-moving inventory as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, as determined by management.

Property and Equipment: Property and equipment are stated at cost. Estimated useful lives are as follows:

Office Equipment and Software (years)	3	–	7
Leasehold Improvements		Lesser of useful life or lease term
Shop Equipment (years)		7
Transportation Equipment (years)	5	–	7

Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method. Betterments, renewals and extraordinary repairs that extend the life of the assets are capitalized. Other repairs and maintenance costs are expensed when incurred. When disposed, the cost and accumulated depreciation applicable to assets retired are removed from the accounts and the gain or loss on disposition is recognized in other income (expense). Depreciation and amortization expense for the three month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 amounted to $42,000 and $29,000, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense for the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 amounted to $85,000 and $61,000, respectively.

Whenever events or circumstances indicate, our long-lived assets, including any intangible assets with finite useful lives, are tested for impairment by using the estimated future cash flows directly associated with, and that are expected to arise as a direct result of, the use of the assets. If the carrying amount exceeds the estimated undiscounted cash flows, an impairment may be indicated. The carrying amount is then compared to the estimated discounted cash flows, and if there is an excess, such amount is recorded as an impairment. During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, we recorded $0 in impairment charges.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments: As defined by U.S. GAAP, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. All assets and liabilities are required to be measured and reported on a fair value basis. A hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information is used to determine fair values. Assets and liabilities carried at fair value will be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).

The FASB’s (Financial Accounting Standards Board) guidance for the disclosure about fair value of financial instruments requires disclosure of an estimate of the fair value of certain financial instruments. The fair value of financial instruments pursuant to FASB’s guidance for the disclosure about fair value of financial instruments approximated their carrying values at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The carrying amount of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued expenses approximates their fair value due to their short maturity. The carrying amount of notes payable approximates fair value because stated or implied interest rates approximate current interest rates that are available for debt with similar terms.

Revenue Recognition: Our terms provide that customers are obligated to pay for products sold to them within a specified number of days from the date that title to the products is transferred to the customers. Our standard terms are typically net 30 days. We recognize revenue when transfer of title occurs, risk of ownership passes to a customer at the time of shipment or delivery depending on the terms of the agreement with a particular customer and collection is reasonably assured. The sale price of our products is substantially fixed and determinable at the date of the sale based upon purchase orders generated by a customer and accepted by us.

We occasionally enter into prototype development contracts with customers. In such cases, revenue is recognized using either (a) the proportional effort method based on the relationship of costs incurred to date to the total estimated cost to complete a contract, or (b) where appropriate, the milestone method, if milestones are clearly identifiable and substantive.

During the first quarter of 2013, we entered into a prototype development agreement with a Chinese automotive manufacturer to design, develop and manufacture an IsoTorque® differential for a specific vehicle application. Essentially, there is one performance milestone associated with the agreement, which is the delivery of our IsoTorque prototypes to the customer that they can test and evaluate. In total, the customer will pay us approximately $39,000 in two installments. We deferred the recognition of revenue and related expenses pertaining to this development agreement until we achieved the delivery milestone. In April 2014, we completed the delivery of the prototypes fulfilling our performance obligations under this agreement, and have recognized revenue and related expenses, accordingly during the second quarter of 2014.

Research and Development and Patents: Research and development costs and patent expenses are charged to operations as incurred. Research and development includes personnel-related costs, materials and supplies, depreciation, consulting services, and amortization of acquired technology. Depreciation expense for the three month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 that was charged to research and development was $24,000 and $10,000, respectively. Depreciation expense for the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 that was charged to research and development was $48,000 and $20,000, respectively.

Patent costs for the three month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 amounted to $15,000 and $29,000, respectively, and are included in general and administrative expenses. Patent costs for the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 amounted to $47,000 and $74,000, respectively, and are included in general and administrative expenses.

Stock-based Compensation: FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 718-10 requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized as compensation expense over the service period (generally the vesting period) in the consolidated financial statements based on their fair values on the grant date. Under the modified prospective method that we adopted, awards that were granted, modified, or settled on or after January 1, 2006 are measured and accounted for in accordance with ASC 718-10. Unvested equity-classified awards that were granted prior to January 1, 2006 will continue to be accounted for in accordance with ASC 718-10, except that the grant date fair value of all awards are recognized in the results of operations over the remaining vesting periods. The impact of forfeitures that may occur prior to vesting is also estimated and considered in the amount recognized. In addition, the realization of tax benefits in excess of amounts recognized for financial reporting purposes will be recognized as a financing activity in accordance with ASC 718-10.

No tax benefits were attributed to the stock-based compensation expense because a valuation allowance was maintained for substantially all net deferred tax assets. We elected to adopt the alternative method of calculating the historical pool of windfall tax benefits as permitted by ASC 718-10-65 (previously known as: FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. SFAS 123(R)-c, “Transition Election Related to Accounting for the Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards”). This is a simplified method to determine the pool of windfall tax benefits that is used in determining the tax effects of stock compensation in the results of operations and cash flow reporting for awards that were outstanding as of the adoption of ASC 718-10.

FASB ASC 505-50, “Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees,” requires all share-based payments to non-employees, including grants of stock options, to be recognized in the consolidated financial statements as compensation expense generally over the service period of the consulting arrangement or until performance conditions are expected to be met. Using a Black-Scholes valuation model, we periodically reassess the fair value of non-employee options until service conditions are met, which generally aligns with the vesting period of the options, and we adjust the expense recognized in the consolidated financial statements accordingly.

FASB ASC 718-20 requires that modifications of the terms or conditions of equity awards be treated as an exchange of the original award for a new award.  Incremental compensation cost is measured as the excess, if any, of the fair value of the modified award over the fair value of the original award immediately before its terms are modified.

Income Taxes: We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method, the objective of which is to establish deferred tax assets and liabilities for the temporary differences between the financial reporting and the tax bases of our assets and liabilities at enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when such amounts are realized or settled. A valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

We account for uncertain tax positions using a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold based on the technical merits of the tax position taken. Tax benefits that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be measured as the largest amount of tax benefits, determined on a cumulative probability basis, which is more likely than not to be realized upon ultimate settlement in the financial statements. It is our policy to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters as general and administrative expenses. As of June 30, 2014, there was $0 accrued interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions. The tax years 2010 through 2013 remain open to examination by the federal and state tax jurisdictions to which we are subject. In addition, our 2009 tax year was examined by the Internal Revenue Service resulting in an inconclusive adjustment due to the expiration of the statute of limitations. The Internal Revenue Service will conclude on any adjustments during its current audit of the 2012 tax year which began during the second quarter of 2014.

Loss per Common Share: FASB’s ASC 260-10 (previously known as FASB Statement 128, “Earnings Per Share”) requires the presentation of basic earnings per share, which is based on weighted average common stock outstanding, and dilutive earnings per share, which gives effect to options, warrants and convertible securities in periods when they are dilutive. At June 30, 2014 and 2013, we excluded 53,622,743 and 29,074,764 potential common shares, respectively, relating to convertible preferred stock, options and warrants outstanding from the diluted net loss per common share calculation because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. In addition, we excluded 625,000 warrants from the diluted net loss per common share calculation at June 30, 2014 and 2013 as the conditions for their vesting are not time-based.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements: In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-10, ”Development Stage Entities: Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation.” This ASU amends FASB ASC Topic 915, Development Stage Entities, to remove all incremental financial reporting requirements for development stage entities, thereby improving financial reporting by reducing the cost and complexity associated with providing that information. The amendments in this ASU also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in FASB ASC 810 for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity (VIE) on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The amendments in this ASU remove the definition of development stage entity from the FASB ASC Master Glossary, thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other entities from U.S. GAAP. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (i) present inception-to-date information on the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity, (ii) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (iii) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, (iv) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage. The amendments also clarify that the guidance in FASB ASC 275, Risks and Uncertainties, is applicable to entities that have not yet commenced planned principal operations. The amendments related to the elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of FASB ASC 915 should be applied retrospectively, except for the clarification to FASB ASC 275, which should be applied prospectively. For public business entities, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Earlier implementation is allowed for any period where the reporting entity’s annual or interim financial statements have not yet been made available for issuance. Management elected to adopt this standard during the quarter ended June 30, 2014. The early adoption of this standard in the second quarter of 2014 resulted in the elimination of various disclosures previously required but did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In July 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2013-11, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists.” The amendments in this ASU state that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except as follows. To the extent a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of this standard in the first quarter of 2014 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, ”Revenue from Contracts with Customers”, which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing U.S. GAAP. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein, using either of the following transition methods: (i) a full retrospective approach reflecting the application of the standard in each prior reporting period with the option to elect certain practical expedients, or (ii) a retrospective approach with the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASU 2014-09 recognized at the date of adoption (which includes additional footnote disclosures). We are currently evaluating the impact of our pending adoption of ASU 2014-09 on our consolidated financial statements and have not yet determined the method by which we will adopt the standard in 2017.