XML 76 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Goodwill And Other Intangible Assets
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill And Other Intangible Assets
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE AND LONG-LIVED ASSETS
Acquisition of Datacom
On April 30, 2013, the Company acquired the business process outsourcing operations of New Zealand-based Datacom, including contact centers in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia and Manila, Philippines. The purchase price of $20.0 AUD (approximately $20.0 USD) included $15.0 of cash paid at closing and assumptions of $5.3 of debt obligations which were immediately paid by the Company, as well as working capital adjustments that were finalized during the third quarter of 2013. In connection with the acquisition, the Company recognized $10.3 of goodwill and $7.0 of customer relationship intangible asset. The customer relationship intangible asset will be amortized over an estimated economic useful life of 8 years. The determination of the useful life is based upon consideration of market participant and transaction specific factors. The Company included various industry studies, historical acquisition experience, economic factors, future cash flows of the combined company and the relative stability of the acquired customer base. The acquired goodwill is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The intangible assets fall within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy under U.S. GAAP.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill was $589.3 at September 30, 2013 compared to $577.7 at December 31, 2012. This increase was primarily due to the acquisition discussed above. Second quarter 2012 results of operations include a $46.0 goodwill impairment charge recorded within the asset impairment caption in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company tests goodwill for impairment annually as of October 1 and at other times if events have occurred or circumstances exist that indicate the carrying value of goodwill may no longer be recoverable. Goodwill impairment testing is performed at the reporting unit level, one level below the business segment. The Company's three reporting units prior to the sale of Information Management were CM Live Agents, CM Customer Interaction Technology (CIT) and Information Management.
The impairment test for goodwill involves a two-step process. The first step compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including the goodwill allocated to each reporting unit. If the carrying amount is in excess of the fair value, the second step requires the comparison of the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of the reporting unit goodwill. Any excess of the carrying value of the reporting unit goodwill over the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill will be recorded as an impairment loss. Fair value of the reporting units is determined using a combination of the market approach and the income approach. Under the market approach, fair value is based on actual stock price or transaction prices of comparable companies. Under the income approach, value is dependent on the present value of net cash flows to be derived from the ownership.
Completion of the sale of the Information Management business qualified as a triggering event for an interim assessment of goodwill impairment for the Company's CIT reporting unit. The sale of the Information Management business impacted the sale of certain products developed by the CIT reporting unit and co-marketed by CIT and the Information Management business. Due in part to this transition, the fair value of the CIT reporting unit was determined to be less than its carrying value. The conclusion of step two of the impairment analysis resulted in the impairment of the entire $46.0 goodwill balance of this reporting unit. The Company, therefore, recorded a $46.0 ($44.4 net of tax) goodwill impairment charge, included within operating income, during the second quarter of 2012. Fair value was determined based on a discounted cash flow analysis which contains significant unobservable inputs that fall within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy under U.S. GAAP.
Intangible assets (including software and customer relationships) decreased to $32.8 at September 30, 2013 from $33.7 at December 31, 2012, primarily due to amortization, offset by the acquisition. As of September 30, 2013, the Company’s total identifiable intangible assets, acquired primarily through business combinations, consisted of the following:
 
 
Gross Carrying
Value
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Software (classified with Property, Plant & Equipment)
$
41.3

 
$
(30.0
)
 
$
11.3

Trademarks
10.0

 
(10.0
)
 
—

Customer relationships and other intangibles
126.2

 
(104.7
)
 
21.5

Total
$
177.5

 
$
(144.7
)
 
$
32.8


The intangible assets are being amortized using the following amortizable lives: 5 to 8 years for software, 4 years for trademarks, and 7 to 12 years for customer relationships and other intangibles. The remaining weighted average depreciation period for software is 2.91. The remaining weighted average amortization period for trademarks, customer relationships and other intangibles is 6.57. Amortization of software is included within depreciation expense as the underlying assets are classified within property, plant and equipment.
Trademarks, customer relationships, and other intangibles amortization expense was $4.0 and $5.1 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and is estimated to be approximately $5.3 for the year ended December 31, 2013. The related estimated expense for the five subsequent years ended December 31 is as follows: 
 
 
2014
$
4

2015
3

2016
3

2017
3

2018
3

Thereafter
5



Long-Lived Assets
The Company evaluates its property, plant and equipment when events or circumstances indicate a possible inability to recover their carrying amounts. During 2012, the Company committed to a plan to sell its Corporate office facilities in Cincinnati, Ohio. The facility met the "Held-for-Sale" criteria set forth in U.S. GAAP; the book value was adjusted to its fair value less costs to sell, resulting in an impairment charge of $42.6 ($27.0 after tax) recorded during the second quarter of 2012. During 2013, the Company committed to sell an additional facility in Dallas, Texas which also resulted in "Held-for-Sale" classification. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 the Company recognized net impairment losses of $0.4 and $1.5, respectively, to adjust both facilities to fair value less costs to sell at the date of sale to a third-party buyer. The Company measured assets held-for-sale at the lower of net book value or fair value less cost to sell. Fair value and cost to sell estimates were based on corroborative market data, which is a Level 2 input of the fair value hierarchy under U.S. GAAP. The Company completed the sale of these facilities in July 2013 resulting in cash collections of $47.6.