XML 77 R67.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
Commitments and Contingencies (Details Textuals) (USD $)
6 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2011
Years
Segments
RetirementPlans
Employees
Claims
CubicYards
Landfills
Dec. 31, 2010
Dec. 31, 2009
Dec. 31, 2008
Sep. 09, 2010
Plaintiffs
Jun. 30, 2010
Dec. 23, 2009
Plaintiffs
Oct. 13, 2009
Plaintiffs
Claims
Oct. 08, 2008
Plaintiffs
Sep. 24, 2008
Jul. 03, 2008
Aug. 17, 2007
Site Contingency [Line Items]                        
Punitive damages                     43.1  
Commitments and Contingencies (Textuals)                        
Remediation liability till March 31, 2011 $ 555,400,000 $ 552,100,000 $ 554,100,000     $ 549,300,000            
Total damage                     46,600,000  
Losses accrued related to legal proceedings 111,000,000                      
Rate of post-judgment interest   4.00% 5.00% 8.00%                
Additional plaintiffs approximately filed suit in the Circuit Court             2,400          
Loss contingency class action lawsuit plaintiff criteria for Livingston matter               The court granted class certification for all those living within a six mile radius of the CECOS site between the years 1977 and 1990.        
Maximum amount of post-judgment interest in middle of 2012 9,000,000                      
Current employees participants in multi-employer plans Approximately 20%                      
Counts of amended complaint 3                      
Loss contingency additional potential liability 110,000,000                      
Pre-judgment interest                   300,000    
Attorney fees and litigation costs                   1,100,000    
Number of employees unlawfully fired 3                      
Contribution in multi-employer pension plans (in number) 28                      
Plaintiff alleges unlawfully fired in retaliation                       Plaintiff alleges that he was unlawfully fired in retaliation for refusing to discharge or demote three employees who were all over 50 years old.
Number of plaintiffs filed cases in the Tuscarawas County Ohio Court of Common Pleas         600     82 700      
Actions consolidated in an order issued by court               2        
Amount of compensatory damages as relief requested, in excess of 25,000                      
Punitive damages                     43.1  
Reduction in Punitive damages 7,000,000                      
Countywide Landfill [Member]
                       
Site Contingency [Line Items]                        
Redemption loss range Minimum 55,000,000                      
Redemption loss range Maximum 76,000,000                      
Damages sought The relief requested on behalf of each plaintiff in the consolidated action is: (1) an award of compensatory damages according to proof in an amount in excess of $25,000 for each of the three counts of the amended complaint; (2) an award of punitive damages in the amount of two times compensatory damages, pursuant to applicable statute, or in such amount as may be awarded at trial for each of the three counts of the amended complaint; (3) costs for medical screening and monitoring of each plaintiff; (4) interest on the damages according to law; (5) costs and disbursements of the lawsuit; (6) reasonable fees for attorneys and expert witnesses; and (7) any other and further relief as the court deems just, proper and equitable. Plaintiffs filed an amended consolidated complaint on September 9, 2010, which no longer asserts a claim for medical monitoring.                      
Commitments and Contingencies (Textuals)                        
Damages sought The relief requested on behalf of each plaintiff in the consolidated action is: (1) an award of compensatory damages according to proof in an amount in excess of $25,000 for each of the three counts of the amended complaint; (2) an award of punitive damages in the amount of two times compensatory damages, pursuant to applicable statute, or in such amount as may be awarded at trial for each of the three counts of the amended complaint; (3) costs for medical screening and monitoring of each plaintiff; (4) interest on the damages according to law; (5) costs and disbursements of the lawsuit; (6) reasonable fees for attorneys and expert witnesses; and (7) any other and further relief as the court deems just, proper and equitable. Plaintiffs filed an amended consolidated complaint on September 9, 2010, which no longer asserts a claim for medical monitoring.                      
Congress Development Landfill [Member]
                       
Site Contingency [Line Items]                        
Redemption loss range Minimum 44,000,000                      
Redemption loss range Maximum $ 144,000,000                      
Damages sought In excess of $50 million                      
Punitive damages             In excess of $50 million          
Commitments and Contingencies (Textuals)                        
Damages sought In excess of $50 million                      
Punitive damages             In excess of $50 million