XML 46 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Variable Interest Entities
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
Variable Interest Entities [Abstract]  
Variable Interest Entities

5. Variable Interest Entities

Consolidated VIEs

The capital structure of Bent Tree and Fairmont Oaks (the “Consolidated VIEs”) consisted of senior debt, subordinated debt, and equity capital. The senior debt was in the form of a MRB and accounts for the majority of the total capital of each VIE. As the bondholder, the Partnership was entitled to principal and interest payments and has certain protective rights as established by the MRB documents. The equity ownership in these entities is ultimately held by corporations which are owned by three individuals, one of which is a related party to the Partnership. Additionally, each of these properties was managed by an affiliate of the Partnership, Properties Management, which is an affiliate of Burlington.

The Partnership determined it was the primary beneficiary of the Consolidated VIEs. The Consolidated VIEs were sold in the fourth quarter of 2015 with the gains and results of operations of the Consolidated VIEs reported as part of the discontinued operations in net income for all periods presented. No net income or loss from these properties’ operations or sale accrued to the Unitholders or the General Partner during 2017, 2016 and 2015.

The Partnership determined the TOB Trusts, Term A/B Trusts and TEBS Financings are VIEs and the Partnership is the primary beneficiary. In determining the primary beneficiary of these specific VIEs, the Partnership considered which party has the power to control the activities of the VIEs which most significantly impact their financial performance, the risks that the entity was designed to create, and how each risk affects the VIE.  The executed agreements related to the TOB Trusts, Term A/B Trusts and TEBS Financings stipulate the Partnership has the sole right to cause the Trusts to sell the underlying assets. If they were sold, the extent to which the VIEs will be exposed to gains or losses would result from decisions made by the Partnership.

As the primary beneficiary, the Partnership reports the TOB Trusts, Term A/B Trusts and TEBS Financings on a consolidated basis. The Partnership reports the senior floating-rate participation interests (“SPEARS”) related to the TOB Trusts and the Class A Certificates for both the Term A/B Trusts and TEBS Financings as secured debt financings on the consolidated balance sheets (Note 17). The MRBs secured by the TOB Trusts, Term A/B Trusts and TEBS Financings are reported as assets on the consolidated balance sheets (Note 6).

Non-Consolidated VIEs

The Partnership has variable interests in various entities in the form of MRBs, property loans and investments in unconsolidated entities. These variable interests do not allow the Partnership to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of such VIEs. As a result, the Partnership is not considered the primary beneficiary and does not consolidate the financial statements of these VIEs in the consolidated financial statements.

The Partnership held variable interest in 23 and 20 non-consolidated VIEs at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The following table summarizes the Partnerships variable interests in these entities at December 31, 2017 and 2016:

 

 

 

Maximum Exposure to Loss

 

 

 

December 31, 2017

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

Mortgage revenue bonds

 

$

146,344,195

 

 

$

137,921,000

 

Property loans

 

 

15,824,613

 

 

 

16,476,073

 

Investment in unconsolidated entities

 

 

39,608,927

 

 

 

19,470,006

 

 

 

$

201,777,735

 

 

$

173,867,079

 

 

 

The maximum exposure to loss for the MRBs is equal to the cost adjusted for paydowns at December 31, 2017 and 2016. The difference between a MRB’s carrying value on the consolidated balance sheets and the maximum exposure to loss is a function of the unrealized gains or losses on the MRB. 

 

The maximum exposure to loss on the property loans at December 31, 2017 and 2016 is equal to the unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest. The difference between a property loans’ carrying value and the maximum exposure is the value of loan loss allowances that have been recorded against the property loans.