CONTINGENCIES	12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2023
CONTINGENCIES
CONTINGENCIES	5. CONTINGENCIES From time to time, we receive claims from third parties asserting that our technologies, or those of our licensees, infringe on the other parties’ intellectual property (“IP”) rights. Management believes that these claims are without merit. Additionally, periodically, we are involved in routine legal matters and contractual disputes incidental to our normal operations. In management’s opinion, unless we disclosed otherwise, the resolution of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity. In the normal course of business, we provide indemnification of varying scope to customers, most commonly to licensees in connection with licensing arrangements that include our IP, although these provisions can cover additional matters. Historically, costs related to these guarantees have not been significant, and we are unable to estimate the maximum potential impact of these guarantees on our future results of operations. LGE Korean Withholding Tax Matter On October 16, 2017, we received a letter from LG Electronics Inc. (“LGE”) requesting that we reimburse LGE with respect to withholding tax imposed on LGE by the Korean tax authorities following an investigation where the tax authority determined that LGE failed to withhold on LGE’s royalty payments to Immersion Software Ireland, a subsidiary of the Company, from 2012 to 2014. Pursuant to an agreement reached with LGE, on April 8, 2020, we provided a provisional deposit to LGE in the amount of KRW 5,916,845,454 (approximately $5.0 million) representing the amount of such withholding tax that was imposed on LGE, which provisional deposit would be returned to us to the extent we ultimately prevail in the appeal in the Korean courts. In the second quarter of 2020, we recorded this deposit in Long-term deposits on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. In the fourth quarter of 2021, we recorded an impairment charge of $0.8 million related to the long-term deposits paid to LGE. On November 3, 2017, on behalf of LGE, we filed an appeal with the Korea Tax Tribunal regarding their findings with respect to the withholding taxes related to the 2012 to 2017 period. The Korea Tax Tribunal hearing took place on March 5, 2019. On March 19, 2019, the Korea Tax Tribunal issued its ruling in which it decided not to accept our arguments with respect to the Korean tax authorities’ assessment of withholding tax and penalties imposed on LGE. On behalf of LGE, we filed an appeal with the Korea Administrative Court on June 10, 2019. We have had numerous hearings before the Korea Administrative Court in the years 2019 through 2022. We had a hearing on April 27, 2023, and the Korea Administrative Court rendered a decision on this matter on June 8, 2023, in which it ruled that the withholding taxes and penalties which were imposed by the Korean tax authorities on LGE should be cancelled with litigation costs to be borne by the Korean tax authorities. In connection with the Korea Administrative Court’s decision, the Korean tax authorities filed an appeal on June 28, 2023 with the Seoul High Court to seek the cancellation of the lower court’s decision. The appellate case is in progress at the Seoul High Court and the first and the second hearings were taken place on November 30, 2023 and February 1, 2024, respectively. However, the next hearing will be set at a later date. On April 25, 2023, we received notice from LGE requesting us to reimburse LGE with respect to withholding tax imposed on LGE by the Korean tax authorities following a recent tax audit of LGE for the years 2018 through 2022. Pursuant to an agreement reached with LGE, on June 2, 2023, we provided a provisional deposit to LGE in the amount of KRW 3,024,877,044 (approximately $2.3 million) representing the amount of such withholding tax that was imposed on LGE, which provisional deposit would be returned to us to the extent we ultimately prevail in the appeal in the Korean courts. In the second quarter of 2023, we recorded this deposit in Long-term deposits on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. On June 29, 2023, on behalf of LGE, we filed an appeal with the Korea Tax Tribunal regarding their findings with respect to the withholding taxes related to the 2018 to 2022 period. On August 7, 2023, the Korean tax authority submitted its answer against the tax appeal. On September 8, 2023, on behalf of LGE, the Company submitted its rebuttal brief in response thereto. On September 25, 2023, Korean tax authority submitted an additional response brief, and on November 23, 2023, the Korea Tax Tribunal rendered a decision against LGE, dismissing the claims of the Company on the grounds that its claims are without merit. In response thereto, on behalf of LGE, we filed an appeal with the Korea Administrative Court on December 29, 2023. The first hearing date has not yet been set. As of December 31, 2023, we have accrued $0.3 million of withholding taxes, interest and penalties related to the 2018 to 2022 period for which the Korean tax authorities have assessed LGE. These withholding taxes had been reclassified and reported as an impairment reduction to the Long-term deposit made in the second quarter of 2023 in order to present the deposit at its estimated recoverable value. In the event that we do not ultimately prevail in our appeal in the Korean courts with respect to this case, the applicable deposits included in Long-term deposits would be recorded as additional income tax expense on our Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income, in the period in which we do not ultimately prevail. Samsung Electronics Co. v. Immersion Corporation and Immersion Software Ireland Limited On April 28, 2017, Immersion and Immersion Software Ireland Limited (collectively referred to as “Immersion” in this section) received a letter from Samsung Electronics Co. (“Samsung”) requesting that Immersion reimburse Samsung with respect to withholding tax and penalties imposed on Samsung by the Korean tax authorities following an investigation where the tax authority determined that Samsung failed to withhold taxes on Samsung’s royalty payments to Immersion Software Ireland from 2012 to 2016. The Company was engaged in legal proceedings related to Samsung from 2017 through 2022. In March 2022, as a result of a decision by the Korea Supreme Court, we were reimbursed by Samsung in an amount equal to KRW6,088,855,388 (approximately $5 million) representing Korea national-level taxes, penalties and interest that were canceled by the Korea Supreme Court, which amount is net of $1.3 million of the impairment charge previously recorded in the fourth quarter of 2021. Immersion Corporation vs. Meta Platforms, Inc., f/k/a Facebook, Inc. On May 26, 2022, we filed a complaint against Meta Platforms, Inc. (formerly known as Facebook, Inc.) (“Meta”) in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. The complaint alleges that Meta’s augmented and virtual reality (“AR/VR”) systems, including the Meta Quest 2, infringe six of our patents that cover various uses of haptic effects in connection with such AR/VR systems. We are seeking to enjoin Meta from further infringement and to recover a reasonable royalty for such infringement. The complaint against Meta asserts infringement of the following patents: • U.S. Patent No. 8,469,806: “System and method for providing complex haptic stimulation during input of control gestures, and relating to control of virtual equipment” • U.S. Patent No. 8,896,524: “Context-dependent haptic confirmation system” • U.S. Patent No. 9,727,217: “Haptically enhanced interactivity with interactive content” • U.S. Patent No. 10,248,298: “Haptically enhanced interactivity with interactive content” • U.S. Patent No. 10,269,222: “System with wearable device and haptic output device” • U.S. Patent No. 10,664,143: “Haptically enhanced interactivity with interactive content” Meta responded to the Company’s complaint on August 1, 2022. On September 12, 2022, Meta filed a motion to transfer the lawsuit to the Northern District of California or, in the alternative, to the Austin Division of the Western District of Texas. The Court denied Meta’s motion on May 30, 2023, and held the claim construction hearing on the same day. The Court adopted certain claim constructions during the hearing and issued a formal claim construction order consistent with those constructions on July 7, 2023. On August 2, 2023, Meta filed a mandamus petition asking the Federal Circuit to reverse the district court’s order on Meta’s transfer motion. Fact discovery closed on October 6, 2023. The Federal Circuit denied Meta’s mandamus petition on October 30, 2023. On November 10, 2023, Immersion filed a separate action in the Western District of Texas against Meta directed to its newly launched Quest 3 product, asserting the following patents: • U.S. Patent No. 8,469,806: “System and method for providing complex haptic stimulation during input of control gestures, and relating to control of virtual equipment” • U.S. Patent No. 9,727,217: “Haptically enhanced interactivity with interactive content” • U.S. Patent No. 10,248,298: “Haptically enhanced interactivity with interactive content” • U.S. Patent No. 10,269,222: “System with wearable device and haptic output device” • U.S. Patent No. 10,664,143: “Haptically enhanced interactivity with interactive content” In addition, Meta filed inter partes reviews (“IPRs”), IPR2023-00942; IPR2023-00943; and IPR2023-00944 on May 25, 2023. These are directed to U.S. Patent Nos. 8,469,806; 8,896,524; and 10,269,222, respectively. The Company filed its response to IPR2023-00942 and IPR2023-0094 on September 8, 2023, and to IPR2023-00944 on September 12, 2023. Meta filed IPR2023-00945; IPR2023-00946; and IPR2023-00947 on May 26, 2023. These IPRs are directed to United States Patent Nos. 10,664,143; 9,727,217; and 10,248,298, respectively. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board instituted review of IPR2023-00942 on December 6, 2023; IPR2023-00943 on December 6, 2023; IPR2023-00944 on December 7, 2023; IPR2023-00945 on December 6, 2023; IPR2023-00946 on December 8, 2023; and IPR2023-00947 on December 6, 2023. On January 16, 2024, Immersion and Meta jointly moved to stay all deadlines in district court because they had arrived at a settlement in principle. On January 17, 2024, the Court stayed all deadlines. Under the Court’s order, the parties were to either move to dismiss the proceedings if they finalized the settlement agreement, or alternatively they were to provide the Court with a status update, by January 31, 2024. On February 9, 2024, we finalized a settlement agreement that resolved all district court and PTAB disputes. See Note 12. Subsequent Event in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. Immersion Corporation vs. Xiaomi Group On or about March 3, 2023, we initiated patent infringement lawsuits against several companies of the Xiaomi-Group (the “Xiaomi-Group”) in Germany, France and India. We initiated lawsuits against Xiaomi-Group companies and their agents in the Düsseldorf Regional Court in Germany, the Tribunal judiciaire de Paris (Paris First Instance Civil Court) in France, and the High Court of Delhi, at New Delhi, in India. The complaints allege that the Xiaomi-Group’s devices, including the Xiaomi 12, infringe our patents that cover various uses of haptic effects in connection with such devices. We are seeking injunctions that would allow us to prohibit Xiaomi-Group from selling the infringing devices in Germany, France and India, as well as costs and damages as compensation for such infringement. The complaints against the Xiaomi-Group assert infringement of the following patents: • EP 2 463 752 B1 (German part) titled “Haptisches Feedback-System mit gespeicherten Effekten” • EP 2 463 752 B1 (French part) titled “Système de rendu haptique avec stockage d’effets” • IN 304 396 (India) titled “Haptic Feedback System With Stored Effects” On June 19, 2023, Xiaomi filed an initial response to the Company’s lawsuit in India. On July 7, 2023, the Indian litigation was listed before the Learned Joint Registrar (“JR”), Mr. Siddharth Mathur. The application seeking interim injunction will be heard on March 21, 2024. On July 11, 2023, in the German proceeding Xiaomi filed its nullity action in the German Federal Patent Court, which was served on Immersion on July 27, 2023. Immersion replied on October 27, 2023, and is awaiting Xiaomi’s response which is anticipated to be filed in late January or early February 2024, with a decision expected in March or April of 2024. In the German infringement proceeding, Xiaomi’s statement of defense was due on October 25, 2023. Immersion’s reply was due on February 26, 2024. Xiaomi’s rejoinder is scheduled for July 25, 2024. The oral hearing is scheduled for August 29, 2024. Xiaomi had until December 21, 2023 to reply to Immersion’s writ of summons in the French proceeding. Xiaomi requested an extension, and replied on January 4, 2024. Immersion’s tentative deadline to respond is March 14, 2024. The next case management hearing is scheduled for March 21, 2024. Immersion Corporation vs. Valve Corporation On May 15, 2023, we filed a complaint against Valve Corporation (“Valve”) in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. The complaint alleges that Valve’s AR/VR systems, including the Valve Index, and handheld Steam Deck, infringe seven of our patents that cover various uses of haptic effects in connection with such AR/VR systems and other video game systems. We are seeking to enjoin Valve from further infringement and to recover a reasonable royalty for such infringement. The complaint against Valve asserts infringement of the following patents: • U.S. Patent No. 7,336,260: “Method and Apparatus for Providing Tactile Sensations” • U.S. Patent No. 8,749,507: “Systems and Methods for Adaptive Interpretation of Input from a Touch-Sensitive Input Device” • U.S. Patent No. 9,430,042: “Virtual Detents Through Vibrotactile Feedback” • U.S. Patent No. 9,116,546: “System for Haptically Representing Sensor Input” • U.S. Patent No. 10,627,907: “Position Control of a User Input Element Associated With a Haptic Output Device” • U.S. Patent No. 10,665,067: “Systems and Methods for Integrating Haptics Overlay in Augmented Reality” • U.S. Patent No. 11,175,738: “Systems and Methods for Proximity-Based Haptic Feedback” Valve responded to the Complaint on July 24, 2023 with a motion to dismiss. Valve re-noted its motion, which changed the Company’s response deadline from August 14, 2023, to August 21, 2023. The Company timely filed its response and Valve filed its reply on August 25, 2023. The motion remains pending. The Court entered a case schedule on November 21, 2023. The case schedule does not include a trial date but set the pretrial conference for May 30, 2025.

From time to time, we receive claims from third parties asserting that our technologies, or those of our licensees, infringe on the other parties’ intellectual property (“IP”) rights. Management believes that these claims are without merit. Additionally, periodically, we are involved in routine legal matters and contractual disputes incidental to our normal operations. In management’s opinion, unless we disclosed otherwise, the resolution of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

In the normal course of business, we provide indemnification of varying scope to customers, most commonly to licensees in connection with licensing arrangements that include our IP, although these provisions can cover additional matters. Historically, costs related to these guarantees have not been significant, and we are unable to estimate the maximum potential impact of these guarantees on our future results of operations.

LGE Korean Withholding Tax Matter

On October 16, 2017, we received a letter from LG Electronics Inc. (“LGE”) requesting that we reimburse LGE with respect to withholding tax imposed on LGE by the Korean tax authorities following an investigation where the tax authority determined that LGE failed to withhold on LGE’s royalty payments to Immersion Software Ireland, a subsidiary of the Company, from 2012 to 2014. Pursuant to an agreement reached with LGE, on April 8, 2020, we provided a provisional deposit to LGE in the amount of KRW 5,916,845,454 (approximately $5.0 million) representing the amount of such withholding tax that was imposed on LGE, which provisional deposit would be returned to us to the extent we ultimately prevail in the appeal in the Korean courts. In the second quarter of 2020, we recorded this deposit in Long-term deposits on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. In the fourth quarter of 2021, we recorded an impairment charge of $0.8 million related to the long-term deposits paid to LGE.

On November 3, 2017, on behalf of LGE, we filed an appeal with the Korea Tax Tribunal regarding their findings with respect to the withholding taxes related to the 2012 to 2017 period. The Korea Tax Tribunal hearing took place on March 5, 2019. On March 19, 2019, the Korea Tax Tribunal issued its ruling in which it decided not to accept our arguments with respect to the Korean tax authorities’ assessment of withholding tax and penalties imposed on LGE. On behalf of LGE, we filed an appeal with the Korea Administrative Court on June 10, 2019. We have had numerous hearings before the Korea Administrative Court in the years 2019 through 2022. We had a hearing on April 27, 2023, and the Korea Administrative Court rendered a decision on this matter on June 8, 2023, in which it ruled that the withholding taxes and penalties which were imposed by the Korean tax authorities on LGE should be cancelled with litigation costs to be borne by the Korean tax authorities. In connection with the Korea Administrative Court’s decision, the Korean tax authorities filed an appeal on June 28, 2023 with the Seoul High Court to seek the cancellation of the lower court’s decision. The appellate case is in progress at the Seoul High Court and the first and the second hearings were taken place on November 30, 2023 and February 1, 2024, respectively. However, the next hearing will be set at a later date.

On April 25, 2023, we received notice from LGE requesting us to reimburse LGE with respect to withholding tax imposed on LGE by the Korean tax authorities following a recent tax audit of LGE for the years 2018 through 2022. Pursuant to an agreement reached with LGE, on June 2, 2023, we provided a provisional deposit to LGE in the amount of KRW 3,024,877,044 (approximately $2.3 million) representing the amount of such withholding tax that was imposed on LGE, which provisional deposit would be returned to us to the extent we ultimately prevail in the appeal in the Korean courts. In the second quarter of 2023, we recorded this deposit in Long-term deposits on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. On June 29, 2023, on behalf of LGE, we filed an appeal with the Korea Tax Tribunal regarding their findings with respect to the withholding taxes related to the 2018 to 2022 period. On August 7, 2023, the Korean tax authority submitted its answer against the tax appeal. On September 8, 2023, on behalf of LGE, the Company submitted its rebuttal brief in response thereto. On September 25, 2023, Korean tax authority submitted an additional response brief, and on November 23, 2023, the Korea Tax Tribunal rendered a decision against LGE, dismissing the claims of the Company on the grounds that its claims are without merit. In response thereto, on behalf of LGE, we filed an appeal with the Korea Administrative Court on December 29, 2023. The first hearing date has not yet been set. As of December 31, 2023, we have accrued $0.3 million of withholding taxes, interest and penalties related to the 2018 to 2022 period for which the Korean tax authorities have assessed LGE. These withholding taxes had been reclassified and reported as an impairment reduction to the Long-term deposit made in the second quarter of 2023 in order to present the deposit at its estimated recoverable value.

In the event that we do not ultimately prevail in our appeal in the Korean courts with respect to this case, the applicable deposits included in Long-term deposits would be recorded as additional income tax expense on our Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income, in the period in which we do not ultimately prevail.

Samsung Electronics Co. v. Immersion Corporation and Immersion Software Ireland Limited

On April 28, 2017, Immersion and Immersion Software Ireland Limited (collectively referred to as “Immersion” in this section) received a letter from Samsung Electronics Co. (“Samsung”) requesting that Immersion reimburse Samsung with respect to withholding tax and penalties imposed on Samsung by the Korean tax authorities following an investigation where the tax authority determined that Samsung failed to withhold taxes on Samsung’s royalty payments to Immersion Software Ireland from 2012 to 2016. The Company was engaged in legal proceedings related to Samsung from 2017 through 2022. In March 2022, as a result of a decision by the Korea Supreme Court, we were reimbursed by Samsung in an amount equal to KRW6,088,855,388 (approximately $5 million) representing Korea national-level taxes, penalties and interest that were canceled by the Korea Supreme Court, which amount is net of $1.3 million of the impairment charge previously recorded in the fourth quarter of 2021.

Immersion Corporation vs. Meta Platforms, Inc., f/k/a Facebook, Inc.

On May 26, 2022, we filed a complaint against Meta Platforms, Inc. (formerly known as Facebook, Inc.) (“Meta”) in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. The complaint alleges that Meta’s augmented and virtual reality (“AR/VR”) systems, including the Meta Quest 2, infringe six of our patents that cover various uses of haptic effects in connection with such AR/VR systems. We are seeking to enjoin Meta from further infringement and to recover a reasonable royalty for such infringement.

The complaint against Meta asserts infringement of the following patents:

• U.S. Patent No. 8,469,806: “System and method for providing complex haptic stimulation during input of control gestures, and relating to control of virtual equipment”

• U.S. Patent No. 8,896,524: “Context-dependent haptic confirmation system”

• U.S. Patent No. 9,727,217: “Haptically enhanced interactivity with interactive content”

• U.S. Patent No. 10,248,298: “Haptically enhanced interactivity with interactive content”

• U.S. Patent No. 10,269,222: “System with wearable device and haptic output device”

• U.S. Patent No. 10,664,143: “Haptically enhanced interactivity with interactive content”

Meta responded to the Company’s complaint on August 1, 2022. On September 12, 2022, Meta filed a motion to transfer the lawsuit to the Northern District of California or, in the alternative, to the Austin Division of the Western District of Texas. The Court denied Meta’s motion on May 30, 2023, and held the claim construction hearing on the same day. The Court adopted certain claim constructions during the hearing and issued a formal claim construction order consistent with those constructions on July 7, 2023. On August 2, 2023, Meta filed a mandamus petition asking the Federal Circuit to reverse the district court’s order on Meta’s transfer motion. Fact discovery closed on October 6, 2023. The Federal Circuit denied Meta’s mandamus petition on October 30, 2023.

On November 10, 2023, Immersion filed a separate action in the Western District of Texas against Meta directed to its newly launched Quest 3 product, asserting the following patents:

• U.S. Patent No. 8,469,806: “System and method for providing complex haptic stimulation during input of control gestures, and relating to control of virtual equipment”

• U.S. Patent No. 9,727,217: “Haptically enhanced interactivity with interactive content”

• U.S. Patent No. 10,248,298: “Haptically enhanced interactivity with interactive content”

• U.S. Patent No. 10,269,222: “System with wearable device and haptic output device”

• U.S. Patent No. 10,664,143: “Haptically enhanced interactivity with interactive content”

In addition, Meta filed inter partes reviews (“IPRs”), IPR2023-00942; IPR2023-00943; and IPR2023-00944 on May 25, 2023. These are directed to U.S. Patent Nos. 8,469,806; 8,896,524; and 10,269,222, respectively. The Company filed its response to IPR2023-00942 and IPR2023-0094 on September 8, 2023, and to IPR2023-00944 on September 12, 2023. Meta filed IPR2023-00945; IPR2023-00946; and IPR2023-00947 on May 26, 2023. These IPRs are directed to United States Patent Nos. 10,664,143; 9,727,217; and 10,248,298, respectively. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board instituted review of IPR2023-00942 on December 6, 2023; IPR2023-00943 on December 6, 2023; IPR2023-00944 on December 7, 2023; IPR2023-00945 on December 6, 2023; IPR2023-00946 on December 8, 2023; and IPR2023-00947 on December 6, 2023.

On January 16, 2024, Immersion and Meta jointly moved to stay all deadlines in district court because they had arrived at a settlement in principle. On January 17, 2024, the Court stayed all deadlines. Under the Court’s order, the parties were to either move to dismiss the proceedings if they finalized the settlement agreement, or alternatively they were to provide the Court with a status update, by January 31, 2024. On February 9, 2024, we finalized a settlement agreement that resolved all district court and PTAB disputes. See Note 12. Subsequent Event in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Immersion Corporation vs. Xiaomi Group

On or about March 3, 2023, we initiated patent infringement lawsuits against several companies of the Xiaomi-Group (the “Xiaomi-Group”) in Germany, France and India. We initiated lawsuits against Xiaomi-Group companies and their agents in the Düsseldorf Regional Court in Germany, the Tribunal judiciaire de Paris (Paris First Instance Civil Court) in France, and the High Court of Delhi, at New Delhi, in India.

The complaints allege that the Xiaomi-Group’s devices, including the Xiaomi 12, infringe our patents that cover various uses of haptic effects in connection with such devices. We are seeking injunctions that would allow us to prohibit Xiaomi-Group from selling the infringing devices in Germany, France and India, as well as costs and damages as compensation for such infringement.

The complaints against the Xiaomi-Group assert infringement of the following patents:

• EP 2 463 752 B1 (German part) titled “Haptisches Feedback-System mit gespeicherten Effekten”

• EP 2 463 752 B1 (French part) titled “Système de rendu haptique avec stockage d’effets”

• IN 304 396 (India) titled “Haptic Feedback System With Stored Effects”

On June 19, 2023, Xiaomi filed an initial response to the Company’s lawsuit in India. On July 7, 2023, the Indian litigation was listed before the Learned Joint Registrar (“JR”), Mr. Siddharth Mathur. The application seeking interim injunction will be heard on March 21, 2024.

On July 11, 2023, in the German proceeding Xiaomi filed its nullity action in the German Federal Patent Court, which was served on Immersion on July 27, 2023. Immersion replied on October 27, 2023, and is awaiting Xiaomi’s response which is anticipated to be filed in late January or early February 2024, with a decision expected in March or April of 2024. In the German infringement proceeding, Xiaomi’s statement of defense was due on October 25, 2023. Immersion’s reply was due on February 26, 2024. Xiaomi’s rejoinder is scheduled for July 25, 2024. The oral hearing is scheduled for August 29, 2024.

Xiaomi had until December 21, 2023 to reply to Immersion’s writ of summons in the French proceeding. Xiaomi requested an extension, and replied on January 4, 2024. Immersion’s tentative deadline to respond is March 14, 2024. The next case management hearing is scheduled for March 21, 2024.

Immersion Corporation vs. Valve Corporation

On May 15, 2023, we filed a complaint against Valve Corporation (“Valve”) in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. The complaint alleges that Valve’s AR/VR systems, including the Valve Index, and handheld Steam Deck, infringe seven of our patents that cover various uses of haptic effects in connection with such AR/VR systems and other video game systems. We are seeking to enjoin Valve from further infringement and to recover a reasonable royalty for such infringement.

The complaint against Valve asserts infringement of the following patents:

• U.S. Patent No. 7,336,260: “Method and Apparatus for Providing Tactile Sensations”

• U.S. Patent No. 8,749,507: “Systems and Methods for Adaptive Interpretation of Input from a Touch-Sensitive Input Device”

• U.S. Patent No. 9,430,042: “Virtual Detents Through Vibrotactile Feedback”

• U.S. Patent No. 9,116,546: “System for Haptically Representing Sensor Input”

• U.S. Patent No. 10,627,907: “Position Control of a User Input Element Associated With a Haptic Output Device”

• U.S. Patent No. 10,665,067: “Systems and Methods for Integrating Haptics Overlay in Augmented Reality”

• U.S. Patent No. 11,175,738: “Systems and Methods for Proximity-Based Haptic Feedback”

Valve responded to the Complaint on July 24, 2023 with a motion to dismiss. Valve re-noted its motion, which changed the Company’s response deadline from August 14, 2023, to August 21, 2023. The Company timely filed its response and Valve filed its reply on August 25, 2023. The motion remains pending. The Court entered a case schedule on November 21, 2023. The case schedule does not include a trial date but set the pretrial conference for May 30, 2025.