þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act: none.
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act: common stock (title of class), $0.0001 par value.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Smaller reporting company þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes þ No o

The aggregate market value of the registrant's common stock, $0.0001 par value (the only class of voting stock), held by non-affiliates (14,958,355 shares) was approximately $789,801 based on the average closing bid and asked prices ($0.0528) for the common stock on May 5, 2010.

At May 12, 2010 the number of shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock, $0.0001 par value (the only class of voting stock), was 18,423,309.

As used herein the terms “Company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer to Solar Energy Limited, our predecessors, and our subsidiaries, unless context indicates otherwise.

The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware as Taurus Enterprises, Inc., on January 5, 1994, and re-incorporated in Nevada on August 20, 1996, as Salvage World, Inc. On December 17, 1997, the Company effected a Plan of Reorganization and Merger of Salvage World, Inc., into Solar Energy Limited, a private Delaware corporation, the effect of which merger changed our name and moved our place of incorporation from Nevada to Delaware.

Since reorganization the Company has focused on the development of cost-effective solutions for global issues related to water, energy and pollution. The primary thrust of that focus was initially in connection with the development of renewable energy sources such as solar energy. The Company believed that with the right technologies renewable energy could prospectively compete in price with traditional energy sources. Nevertheless, the Company was unable to realize any commercial application of such technologies.

In 2005 the Company redirected its focus to tackle carbon sequestration with a process designed to generate plankton blooms in the oceans as a means to resist global warming. At the same time the Company began the development of an application of “cold fusion” technologies as a potential source of unlimited energy. The Company abandoned carbon sequestration in 2007 and cold fusion development in 2008 following an inability to realize success in either of these processes.

On February 22, 2008 the Company entered into an agreement with Russ George, the proponent of the carbon sequestration process and the “cold fusion” technologies, to separate itself and its subsidiaries from his management, pursuant to which Mr. George agreed to cancel 3.5 million shares in exchange for the non-exclusive use of the know-how associated with both “iron-fertilization” and “cold fusion”.

The Company acquired Planktos, Inc. in August of 2005 from Mr. George intent on improving the world’s marine and terrestrial environments by acting on commercial opportunities related to carbon sequestration projects. Planktos operated as a wholly subsidiary of the Company until August of 2007 at which time it was sold to Planktos Corp. for a controlling equity interest in that entity. Planktos Corp.’s efforts to finance and conduct an “iron-fertilization” prove out program while at the same time attempting to fund a reforestation project in Hungary were not successful. A combination of poor market conditions, condemnation from certain environmental groups and local opposition to ocean research caused Planktos to suspend operations in December of 2007.

On November 12, 2008 the Company sold its entire interest in Planktos Corp. to Maidon Services Limited in exchange for cash consideration of $200,000 of which $125,000 was paid with the remainder due currently in default.

The Company acquired D-2 Fusion, Inc. from Mr. George in August of 2005 in order to fund research and development into solid-state fusion technology. Designs for entry level heat and energy applications for homes and industry were the focus of that effort.

D-2 Fusion’s attempts to develop an energy program built around “cold fusion” met with limited successes that could not be replicated. Several attempts to realize funding commitments for the D-2 Fusion research and development effort proved unsuccessful. Consequently, D2-Fusion was forced to suspend operations prior to year end December 31, 2008.

Our principal place of business is located at 73200 El Paseo, Suite 2H, Palm Desert, California, 92260, and our telephone number is (760) 773-1111. Our registered statutory office is located at The Company Corporation, 2711 Centerville Road, Wilmington, Delaware, 19808.

The Company’s shares are quoted on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board under the symbol “SLRE”.

The Company’s plan for the coming year is to actively pursue development stage assets and emerging businesses with which to merge or acquire. We intend to function as a business incubator for assets and businesses that focus on (i) cost-effective renewable energy sources that do not threaten the environment, (ii) practical solutions to mitigate the effects of traditional energy sources’ unintended consequences concerning global climate change and (iii) revenue producing business activities. We will fund the process of driving emerging technologies towards commercial applications through debt or equity offerings tied to our common stock.

Selection of a Business

Management has adopted a conservative policy of seeking opportunities that it considers to be of exceptional quality. Therefore, we may have to wait some time before consummating a suitable transaction. Management recognizes that the higher the standards it imposes, the greater may be its competitive disadvantage when vying with other acquiring interests or entities.

The Company does not intend to restrict its consideration to any particular business or industry segment, though management intends to continue its focus on opportunities related to renewable energy sources and combating climate change. Due to our lack of financial resources, the scope and number of suitable business ventures is limited. We are therefore most likely to participate in a single business venture. Accordingly, the Company will not be able to diversify and will be limited to one merger or acquisition. The lack of diversification will prevent us from offsetting losses from one business opportunity against profits from another.

The decision to participate in a specific business opportunity will be made upon management’s analysis of the quality of the opportunity’s management and personnel, the anticipated acceptability of products or marketing concepts, the merit of technological changes and numerous other factors which are difficult, if not impossible, to analyze through the application of any objective criteria. Further, it is anticipated that the historical operations of a specific venture may not necessarily be indicative of the potential for the future because of the necessity to substantially shift a marketing approach, expand operations, change product emphasis, change or substantially augment management, or make other changes. The Company will be partially dependent upon the management of any given business opportunity to identify such problems and to implement, or be primarily responsible for the implementation of required changes.

Since we may participate in a business opportunity with a newly organized business or with a business which is entering a new phase of growth, it should be emphasized that the Company may incur risk due to the failure of the target’s management to have proven its abilities or effectiveness, or the failure to establish a market for the target’s products or services, or the failure to realize profits.

The Company will not acquire or merge with any company for which audited financial statements cannot be obtained. Management anticipates that any opportunity in which we participate will present certain risks. Many of these risks cannot be adequately identified prior to selection of a specific opportunity. Our shareholders must therefore depend on the ability of management to identify and evaluate such risks. Further, in the case of some of the opportunities available to us, it may be anticipated that some of such opportunities are yet to develop as going concerns or that some of such opportunities are in the development stage in that same have not generated significant revenues from principal business activities prior to our participation.

Acquisition of Business

Implementation of a structure for any particular business acquisition may involve a merger, consolidation, reorganization, joint venture, franchise or licensing agreement with another corporation or entity. The Company may also purchase stock or assets of an existing business. On the completion of a transaction, it is possible that present management and shareholders of the Company would not remain in control of the Company. Further, our sole officer and director may, as part of the terms of any transaction, resign, to be replaced by new officers and directors without a vote of our shareholders.

We anticipate that any securities issued in any such reorganization would be issued in reliance on exemptions from registration under applicable federal and state securities laws. However, in certain circumstances, as a negotiated element of any transaction, the Company may agree to register securities either at the time a transaction is consummated, under certain conditions, or at a specified time thereafter. The issuance of substantial additional securities and their potential sale into any trading market may have a depressive effect on such market.

While the actual terms of a transaction to which the Company may be a party cannot be predicted, it may be expected that the parties to a business transaction will find it desirable to avoid the creation of a taxable event and thereby structure the acquisition in a so called “tax-free” reorganization under Section 368(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). In order to obtain tax-free treatment under the Code, it may be necessary for the owners of the acquired business to own 80% or more of the voting stock of the surviving entity. In such event, our shareholders would retain less than 20% of the issued and outstanding shares of the surviving entity, which could result in significant dilution in the equity of such shareholders.

Our due diligence process will require that management meet personally with the personnel involved in any given transaction, visit and inspect material facilities, obtain independent analysis or verification of the information provided, check references for management and key persons, and take other reasonable investigative measures, to the extent of our limited financial resources and management expertise.

The manner in which we participate in an opportunity will depend on the nature of the opportunity, the respective needs and desires of the Company and other parties, the management of the opportunity, and the our relative negotiating strengths. Negotiations that involve mergers or acquisitions will focus on the percentage of the Company that the target company shareholders would acquire in exchange for their shareholdings in the target company. Depending upon, among other things, the target company’s assets and liabilities, our shareholders will in all likelihood hold a lesser percentage ownership interest in the Company following any merger or acquisition. The percentage ownership may be subject to significant reduction in the event the Company acquires a target company with substantial assets. Any merger or acquisition effected by the Company can be expected to have a significant dilutive effect on the percentage of shares held by our current shareholders.

Operation of Business after Acquisition

The Company’s operation following its merger or acquisition of a business will be dependent on the nature of the business and the interest acquired. We are unable to determine at this time whether the Company will be in control of the business or whether present management will be in control of the Company following the acquisition. We may expect that any future business will present various challenges that cannot be predicted at the present time.

On April 7, 2010 the Company announced that it intends to acquire Peloton Mining, Inc. (“Peloton”) from a related party. Peloton’s main asset is the exploration and mining rights of 125 sq.km. alluvial property in SE Tanzania. The only other asset of Peloton is that it owns the former producing Churchill Copper property in Northern B.C. (Magnum Mine) subject to a long term option agreement. The Company intends to acquire Peloton through a share exchange and is in the process of raising three million $3,000,000 in working capital to place the first alluvial plant into operation. The $3,000,000 is expected to be a combination of debt and equity. The Company has not entered into a definitive share exchange agreement with Peloton as of the date of this current report.

We will be involved in intense competition with other business entities to obtain a suitable business opportunity many of which competitors will have a considerable edge over us by virtue of their stronger financial resources and prior experience in business.

As we currently are not involved in selling products or services, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in marketing any such products or services or whether a market will develop.

The Company spent no amounts on research and development activities during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. We cannot anticipate the amount of spending on research and development in the future; such level will depend upon on success in raising additional financing and our progress with ongoing development projects in relation to the nature of future businesses that we may incubate.

Patents, Trademarks, Licenses, Franchises, Concessions, Royalty Agreements and Labor Contracts

We currently have no patents, trademarks, licenses, franchises, concessions, royalty agreements or labor contracts.

The Company cannot anticipate which government regulations it may be subject until it has acquired an interest in a business. The use of assets to conduct a business that the Company may acquire will subject it to environmental, public health and safety, land use, trade, or other governmental regulations and state or local taxation. Our selection of a business in which to acquire an interest will include an effort to ascertain, to the extent of the limited resources of the Company, the effects of any government regulation on the prospective business of the Company. However, in certain circumstances, such as the acquisition of an interest in a new or start-up business activity, it may not be possible to predict with any degree of accuracy the impact of government regulation. Nonetheless, it is likely that the Company will be subject to climate change legislation and greenhouse gas regulation

Many studies over the past couple decades have indicated that emissions of certain gases contribute to warming of the Earth’s atmosphere. In response to these studies, many nations have agreed to limit emissions of “greenhouse gases” or “GHGs” pursuant to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, and the “Kyoto Protocol.” Although the United States did not adopt the Kyoto Protocol, several states have adopted legislation and regulations to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. Additionally, the United States Supreme Court has ruled, in Massachusetts, et al. v. EPA, that the EPA abused its discretion under the Clean Air Act by refusing to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from mobile sources. As a result of the Supreme Court decision the EPA issued a finding that serves as the foundation under the Clean Air Act to issue other rules that would result in federal greenhouse gas regulations and emissions limits under the Clean Air Act, even without Congressional action. Finally, acts of Congress, particularly those such as the “American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009” approved by the United States House of Representatives, as well as the decisions of lower courts, large numbers of states, and foreign governments could widely affect climate change regulation. Greenhouse gas legislation and regulation could have a material adverse effect on our future operations.

The Company is a development stage company and currently has no employees. Michael James Gobuty, our sole officer and director, manages the Company. We look to Mr. Gobuty for his entrepreneurial skills and talents. Management uses consultants, attorneys and accountants as necessary and does not plan to engage any full-time employees in the near future.

The Company’s annual report contains audited financial statements. We are not required to deliver an annual report to security holders and will not automatically deliver a copy of the annual report to our security holders unless a request is made for such delivery. We file all of our required reports and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”). The public may read and copy any materials that are filed by the Company with the Commission at the Commission’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. The statements and forms filed by us with the Commission have also been filed electronically and are available for viewing or copy on the Commission maintained Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the Commission. The Internet address for this site can be found at http://www.sec.gov.

The Company’s operations and securities are subject to a number of risks. Below we have identified and discussed the material risks that we are likely to face. Should any of the following risks occur, they will adversely affect our operations, business, financial condition and/or operating results as well as the future trading price and/or the value of our securities.

The Company’s auditors included an explanatory statement in their report of financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, stating that there are certain factors which raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These factors include a lack of revenue generating activities in place and losses since inception.

We have a history of significant operating losses and such losses may continue in the future

Since our inception in 1994, our operations have resulted in a continuation of losses and an accumulated deficit of $15,127,193 at December 31, 2009. The Company has never realized revenue from operations. We expect to continue to incur operating losses as we seek ways to identify additional business opportunities while maintaining operations and satisfying public disclosure obligations. Should we be unable to transition current losses to future profits by developing or acquiring a revenue producing business, our ability to maintain operations will be severely compromised.

Our business will not be profitable in the next twelve months and may never be profitable.

All of our research and development operations are currently suspended and as such we have no expectation of realizing profitable operations within the next twelve months or ever. Any possibility of future profit from operations is highly speculative.

The Company’s limited financial resources cast severe doubt on its ability to develop or acquire a profitable business opportunity.

The Company’s future operation is dependent upon the development or acquisition of a profitable business opportunity. However, the prospect of such development or acquisition is doubtful due to the Company’s limited financial resources. Further, due to the suspension of all research and development activities, the Company is not in a favorable position to improve its financial condition through debt or equity offerings. Ultimately, this limitation may cause us to cease operations.

Our limited financial resources cast severe doubt on our ability to pursue our business plan of incubating new business opportunities.

The Company’s future operation is dependent upon its ability to realize sufficient financing to incubate business opportunities through merger or acquisition. We cannot be certain that financing for our intended purpose will be forthcoming. Our inability to finance new business opportunities will prevent us from developing our business plan and may act as a deterrent in any future negotiations with merger or acquisition candidates. Should the Company be unable to realize financing and develop what might become a profitable business opportunity, it will, in all likelihood, be forced to cease operations.

The Company will need to raise additional capital to fund operations which could adversely affect our shareholders.

The Company will need to raise additional capital. However, we have no commitment from any source of financing to provide us with this necessary additional capital. Should we secure a commitment to provide us with capital such commitment may obligate us to issue additional shares of the Company’s common stock or warrants or other rights to acquire common stock which will result in dilution to existing shareholders. Nonetheless, if we are unable to obtain additional capital, then we will need to restrict or even cease operations, which action would adversely affect our shareholders.

The market for our common stock has been limited due to low trading volume and the small number of brokerage firms acting as market makers. Because of the limitations of our market and volatility of the market price of our stock, investors may face difficulties in selling shares at attractive prices when they want to. The average daily trading volume for our stock has varied significantly from week to week and from month to month, and the trading volume often varies widely from day to day.

We incur significant expenses as a result of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which expenses may continue to negatively impact our financial performance.

We incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses as a result of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as related rules implemented by the Commission, which control the corporate governance practices of public companies. Compliance with these laws, rules and regulations, including compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as discussed in the following risk factor, has substantially increased our expenses, including legal and accounting costs, and made some activities more time-consuming and costly. Further, expenses related to our compliance may increase in the future, as legislation affecting smaller reporting companies comes into effect that may negatively impact our financial performance to the point of having a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Our internal controls over financial reporting are not considered effective which conclusion may result in a loss of investor confidence in our reports and in turn have an adverse effect on our stock price.

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 we are required to furnish a report by our management on our internal controls over financial reporting. Such report must contain, among other matters, an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as of the end of the year, including a statement as to whether or not our internal controls over financial reporting are effective. This assessment must include disclosure of any material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting identified by management. Since we are unable to assert that our internal controls are effective, our investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline.

The Company’s shareholders may face significant restrictions on their stock.

The Company’s stock differs from many stocks in that it is a “penny stock.” The Commission has adopted a number of rules to regulate “penny stocks” including, but not limited to, those rules from the Securities Act as follows:

3a51-1 which defines penny stock as, generally speaking, those securities which are not listed on either NASDAQ or a national securities exchange and are priced under $5, excluding securities of issuers that have net tangible assets greater than $2 million if they have been in operation at least three years, greater than $5 million if in operation less than three years, or average revenue of at least $6 million for the last three years;

15g-1 which outlines transactions by broker/dealers which are exempt from 15g-2 through 15g-6 as those whose commissions from traders are lower than 5% total commissions;

15g-2 which details that brokers must disclose risks of penny stock on Schedule 15G;

15g-3 which details that broker/dealers must disclose quotes and other information relating to the penny stock market;

15g-5 which explains that compensation of persons associated in connection with penny stock sales must be disclosed;

15g-6 which outlines that broker/dealers must send out monthly account statements; and

Since the Company’s securities constitute a “penny stock” within the meaning of the rules, the rules would apply to us and our securities. Because these rules provide regulatory burdens upon broker-dealers, they may affect the ability of shareholders to sell their securities in any market that may develop; the rules themselves may limit the market for penny stocks. Additionally, the market among dealers may not be active. Investors in penny stock often are unable to sell stock back to the dealer that sold them the stock. The mark-ups or commissions charged by the broker-dealers may be greater than any profit a seller may make. Because of large dealer spreads, investors may be unable to sell the stock immediately back to the dealer at the same price the dealer sold the stock to the investor. In some cases, the stock may fall quickly in value. Investors may be unable to reap any profit from any sale of the stock, if they can sell it at all. Shareholders should be aware that, according to Commission Release No. 34-29093 dated April 17, 1991, the market for penny stocks has suffered from patterns of fraud and abuse. These patterns include:

The Company’s maintains an office located at 73200 El Paseo, Suite 2H, Palm Desert, California, 92260, for which the Company pays no rent. The Company does not believe that it will need to maintain any additional office space at any time in the foreseeable future in order to carry out the plan of operation described herein.

Legal proceedings were initiated by Mary Ruth Ladd against the Company, Planktos Corp. (a former subsidiary) and certain individuals affiliated to the Company on October 3, 2007 in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco in connection with allegations of discrimination and retaliation against a whistle blower, wrongful termination, fraud, breach of contract, wrongful business acts and intentionally causing injury in the workplace. The claim sought $58,280 in lost wages in addition to certain employee benefits and punitive damages. The Company retained counsel to respond to these allegations and denied any liability for these alleged causes of action. As of the date of this filing, the Company has obtained a commitment from plaintiff’s counsel to dismiss the case with prejudice, each party bearing its own costs and fees.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

The Company’s common stock is quoted on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board, a service maintained by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), under the symbol “SLRE”. Trading in the common stock over-the-counter market has been limited and sporadic and the quotations set forth below are not necessarily indicative of actual market conditions. These prices reflect inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up, mark-down, or commission, and may not necessarily reflect actual transactions. The high and low bid prices for the common stock for each of the quarters listed below are as follows:

The following is a summary of the material terms of the Company’s capital stock. This summary is subject to and qualified by our articles of incorporation and bylaws.

As of May 12, 2010, there were 437 shareholders of record holding a total of 18,423,309 shares of fully paid and non-assessable common stock of the 50,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001, authorized. The board of directors believes that the number of beneficial owners is substantially greater than the number of record holders because a portion of our outstanding common stock is held in broker “street names” for the benefit of individual investors. The holders of the common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. Holders of the common stock have no preemptive rights and no right to convert their common stock into any other securities. There are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the common stock.

As of May 12, 2010, the Company had no outstanding warrants to purchase shares of our common stock; 1,250,000 warrants expired during the year ended December 31, 2009.

As of May 12, 2010, the Company had no outstanding stock options to purchase shares of our common stock.

As of May 12, 2010, the Company had no outstanding securities, other than options, convertible into shares of the Company’s stock.

The Company has not declared any cash dividends since inception and does not anticipate paying any dividends in the near future. The payment of cash dividends is within the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on our earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, and other relevant factors. There are no restrictions that currently limit the Company's ability to pay cash dividends on its common stock other than those generally imposed by applicable state law.

Our transfer agent is Michael Anzeman at Madison Stock Transfer, Inc., located at 1688 East 16th Street, Suite 7, Brooklyn, New York, 11229. His phone number is (718) 627-4453.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other parts of this report contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “believes,” “plans,” “predicts,” and similar terms. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and our actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences include but are not limited to those discussed in the subsection entitled Forward-Looking Statements and Factors That May Affect Future Results and Financial Condition below. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto included in this report. Our fiscal year end is December 31.

The Company’s plan of operation for the coming year is to actively pursue development stage assets and emerging businesses with which to merge or acquire. We intend to function as a business incubator for assets and businesses that focus on (i) cost-effective renewable energy sources that do not threaten the environment, (ii) practical solutions to mitigate the effects of traditional energy sources’ unintended consequences concerning global climate change and (iii) revenue producing business activities. We will fund the process of driving emerging technologies towards commercial applications through debt or equity offerings tied to our common stock.

On April 7, 2010 the Company announced its intention to acquire Peloton from a related party. The Company has not entered into a definitive share exchange agreement with Peloton as of the date of this current report. Should the Company proceed with its intention to acquire Peloton it will require a minimum of $3,000,000. However, should the Company determine not to proceed with the acquisition of Peloton it will require a minimum of $100,000 to continue its efforts to identify a suitable business opportunity for development, merger or acquisition. Except for the understanding with Peloton, we have not entered into any agreement, nor do we have any commitment or understanding to enter into or become engaged in any transaction. Once the Company has determined to move forward with a specific business opportunity its funding requirements will most certainly change. The Company is currently without sufficient capital to maintain operations and relies on shareholders to satisfy minimal operational expenses.

Results of Operations

During the year ended December 31, 2009 the Company was focused on (i) pursuing financing commitments for its plan of operation, (ii) continuing the search for a business opportunity for development, merger or acquisition, and (iii) satisfying continuous public disclosure requirements.
The Company has not generated any revenues from inception and has discontinued active operations. Since we have no current ability to generate revenue, we expect to incur losses for the foreseeable future.

Net Loss

For the period from January 5, 1994 (inception) to December 31, 2009 the Company recorded a net loss of $15,127,193. Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009, was $148,503 as compared to a net income of $395,834 for the year ended December 31, 2008. The transition to a net loss in the current period can be attributed to a gain on our discontinuation of operations in the prior period related to the cancellation of 3,500,000 common shares as part of a separation agreement with Mr. George. We expect to continue to incur net losses over the next twelve months as we seek out another business opportunity for development, merger or acquisition.

Capital Expenditures

The Company has expended no significant amounts on capital expenditures for the period from inception to December 31, 2009, except for an expenditure of approximately $800,000 on a research vessel in 2007 that has since been sold.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

The Company may have a prospective income tax benefit resulting from a net operating loss carry-forward and start up costs that could offset future operating profits.

Impact of Inflation

The Company believes that inflation has had a negligible effect on operations over the past three years.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company is in the development stage and, since inception, has experienced significant changes in liquidity, capital resources and stockholders’ equity. We have been funded since inception from public or private debt or equity placements or by major shareholders in the form of loans. All of our projects have been experimental in nature and virtually all of the financing raised to date has been either allocated for or related to general and administrative or research and the development activities.

The Company had a working capital deficit of $1,163,860 as of December 31, 2009. Our current and total assets were $15, consisting solely of cash. Our current and total liabilities as of December 31, 2009, totaled $1,163,875, which included a note payable to a related party of $406,446 and advances payable of $459,342. Net stockholders' deficit in the Company was $1,163,860 as of December 31, 2009.

Cash flow used in operating activities was $9,043,637 for the period from inception to December 31, 2009. Cash flow used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2009, was $43,763 as compared to $608,175 for the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease in cash flow used in operating activities in the current period was due primarily to the decrease in net losses in combination with an increase in accounts payable as well as cash used by discontinued operating activities in the prior period.

Cash flow provided by investing activities was $3,040,494 for the period from inception to December 31, 2009. Cash flow provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2009, was $0 as compared to $1,000,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008. Cash flows provided by investing activities in the prior period can be attributed to the sale of Planktos, Inc.' research vessel.

Cash flow provided by financing activities was $6,003,158 for the period from inception to December 31, 2009. Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2009, was $29,925 as compared to cash used in financing activities of $184,138 for the year ended December 31, 2008. Cash flow provided by financing activities in the current period can be attributed to related party loans and advances.

The Company’s current assets are insufficient to conduct its plan of operation over the next twelve months and we will have to seek additional debt or equity financing to fund operations. The Company has no current commitments or arrangements with respect to, or immediate sources of funding. Further, no assurances can be given that funding is available or available to the Company on acceptable terms. The Company’s shareholders would be the most likely source of new funding in the form of loans or equity placements though none have made any commitment for future investment and we have no agreement formal or otherwise. The Company’s inability to obtain funding has had a material adverse affect on our plan of operation and will continue to diminish our efforts.

The Company does not expect to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

The Company had no lines of credit or other bank financing arrangements.

The Company has no defined benefit plan or contractual commitment with any of its officers or directors.

The Company has no current plans for the purchase or sale of any plant or equipment.

The Company currently has no employees and has no plans to hire any employees in the near future.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2009, we had no significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources that are material to stockholders.

Critical Accounting Policies

In the notes to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009, included in this Form 10-K, the Company discussed those accounting policies that are considered to be significant in determining the results of operations and our financial position. We believe that the accounting principles utilized by us conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of financial statements requires management to make significant estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to bad debts, inventories, intangible assets, warranty obligations, product liability, revenue, and income taxes. We base our estimates on historical experience and other facts and circumstances that are believed to be reasonable, and the results form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities. The actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Going Concern

The Company’s auditor’s expressed substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern as a result of recurring losses, lack of revenue-generating activities and an accumulated deficit of $15,127,193 as of December 31, 2009. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is subject to our ability to obtain funding from outside sources. Management’s plan to address our ability to continue as a going concern, include: (i) obtaining funding from private placement sources; (ii) obtaining additional funding from the sale of our securities; (iii) generating revenues from the development of a business opportunity through acquisition or merger; and (iv) obtaining loans and grants from various financial institutions, where possible. Although management believes that it will be able to obtain the necessary funding to allow us to remain a going concern through the methods discussed above, there can be no assurances that such methods will prove successful.

Forward Looking Statements and Factors That May Affect Future Results and Financial Condition

The statements contained in the section titled Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, with the exception of historical facts, are forward looking statements. A safe-harbor provision may not be applicable to the forward looking statements made in this current report Forward looking statements reflect our current expectations and beliefs regarding our future results of operations, performance, and achievements. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and are based upon assumptions and beliefs that may or may not materialize. These statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning:

· our ability to raise additional capital to fund cash requirements for future operations;

We wish to caution readers that our operating results are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those discussed or anticipated including the factors set forth in the section entitled Risk Factors included elsewhere in this report. We also wish to advise readers not to place any undue reliance on the forward looking statements contained in this report, which reflect our beliefs and expectations only as of the date of this report. We assume no obligation to update or revise these forward looking statements to reflect new events or circumstances or any changes in our beliefs or expectations, other than is required by law.

The Company has adopted Accounting Standards Codification Topic (“ASC”) 718, formerly SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) (SFAS No. 123R), Share-Based Payment, which addresses the accounting for stock-based payment transactions in which an enterprise receives employee services in exchange for (a) equity instruments of the enterprise or (b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprise’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments.

We account for equity instruments issued in exchange for the receipt of goods or services from other than employees in accordance with ASC 505. Costs are measured at the estimated fair market value of the consideration received or the estimated fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The value of equity instruments issued for consideration other than employee services is determined on the earliest of a performance commitment or completion of performance by the provider of goods or services.

Please see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements for recent accounting pronouncements.

Our audited financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 are attached hereto as F-1 through F-20.

     Consolidated Statements of Operations                                 F-4

     Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit                  F-5

     Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows                                 F-9

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Solar Energy Limited
Palm Desert, California

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Solar Energy Limited (a development stage company) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the years then ended and for the period from January 5, 1994 (inception) through December 31, 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Solar Energy Limited (a development stage company) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended and for the period from January 5, 1994 (inception) through December 31, 2009 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 4 to the financial statements, the Company’s significant operating losses and negative working capital raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding the resolution of this issue are also discussed in Note 4. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F- 10

Solar Energy Limited

(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009

Solar Energy Limited (the “Company”) is in the development stage according to Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 7 and is currently focusing its attention on raising capital in order to pursue its goals.

On August 10, 2005, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding stock of Planktos, Inc. (“Planktos”) for the purchase price of $1,500,000 by issuing a 5 year term convertible debenture bearing an interest rate of 5%. The proprietary greenhouse emission technology acquired as a result of this acquisition is focused on taking advantage of the Kyoto Protocol which enables companies and governments to offset regulated greenhouse emission restrictions by investing in CO2 reduction programs in exchange for certified emission reduction (“CER”) credits. These CER credits are traded much like commodities and have their own market of which they are listed for sale. In determining the purchase price, consideration was given to previous amounts invested in developing this technology up to the point of acquisition. On November 21, 2005, the debenture was converted into 1,500,000 of the Company’s restricted common shares.

On August 17, 2005, the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary Planktos executed an Iron-Fertilization Prove-Out and Purchase Agreement with Diatom Corporation (“Diatom”) whereby Diatom committed to assist the Company in providing developmental funding for a marine “iron-fertilization” prove out program in exchange for exclusive marketing and intellectual property rights to Planktos’s CO2 sequestration process. Planktos expected the cost of the prove out program to be $1,290,000 of which Diatom agreed to provide up to 25%. The Company was responsible for funding the remainder of the developmental expense. The agreement provided for a royalty agreement which will entitle Planktos and the Company to 75% of net sales revenue generated by Diatom from the sale of CER credits created from the sequestration process until the Company and Planktos have recouped their costs. Thereafter, the Company and Planktos will be entitled to 25% of net sales revenue generated by Diatom from the sale of CERs. Diatom has paid $250,000 in cash for the exclusive marketing and intellectual property rights. Since the Company committed to fund 75% of the estimated cost to develop the program, a provision for the estimated loss on the contract of $967,500 was recognized. During the fourth quarter of 2007 and subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2007, Planktos’ “iron-fertilization” prove out program was suspended and its operations were discontinued. Planktos terminated all employees, liquidated substantially all of its assets and closed its Foster City, California office.

On August 18, 2005, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding stock of D2Fusion, Inc. (“D2Fusion”) for the purchase price of $2,000,000 by issuing a 5 year term convertible debenture bearing an interest rate of 5%. The proprietary solid-state fusion technology acquired as a result of this acquisition is aimed at entry level heat and energy applications for homes and industry with the ultimate goal of producing heat and electricity at a fraction of today’s cost and with no emissions. In determining the purchase price, consideration was given to previous amounts invested in developing this technology up to the point of acquisition. On November 21, 2005, the debenture was converted into 2,000,000 of the Company’s restricted common shares.

On August 9, 2007 the Company and Diatom completed the sale of 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Planktos. Diatom issued 45,000,000 restricted shares of common stock to the Company which represents 53% of the outstanding common stock of Diatom. As part of this transaction Diatom changed its name to “Planktos Corp.” This transaction was in essence an acquisition of Planktos Corp. and was accounted for in accordance with the principles for reverse acquisition accounting.

F- 11

Solar Energy Limited

(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009

NOTE 1 – DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION - continued

On April 11, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with the founder of Planktos and D2 Fusion where the Company received a total of 3,500,000 of its common shares issued as part of the August 10, 2005 and August 18, 2005 stock purchase agreement.

On November 13, 2008, the Company sold its 45,000,000 restricted shares of Planktos Corp. to a Maidon Services Limited for $200,000 of which $125,000 in cash was received on closing and $75,000 was due within fourteen months with an option to convert into Planktos Corp. shares at $0.25 per share. These financial statements include the losses from January 1, 2008 to November 12, 2008 of Planktos Corp. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Planktos.

This summary of significant accounting policies of Solar Energy Limited is presented to assist in understanding the Company’s financial statements. The financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.

The Company’s financial statements are prepared using the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments and short-term debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

ASC 815 (formerly SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”) requires businesses to recognize all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value in the balance sheet, which is effective for the Company as of its inception. These statements establish accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities. They require that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet and measure those instruments at fair value.

If certain conditions are met, a derivative may be specifically designated as a hedge, the objective of which is to match the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging derivative with the recognition of (i) the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk or (ii) the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transaction. For a derivative not designated as a hedging instrument, the gain or loss is recognized in income in the period of change. Historically, the Company has not entered into derivatives contracts to hedge existing risks or for speculative purposes.

The Company issued convertible debt and accounts for that debt according to ASC 815. Consequently, management recognizes its convertible debt contract as containing a derivative instrument and accounts for the derivative according to generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S.

F- 12

Solar Energy Limited

(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009

During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company issued a debenture for a total of $100,000. The debenture included provisions for the conversion of the debt and interest into shares of the Company’s common stock or into CO2 Tonnes. Since Planktos Corp. had suspended its operations, the conversion into CO2 Tonnes is no longer available and the debenture is accounted for as a promissory note with fixed interest. See Note 7.

The Company has not earned any revenue from operations. Accordingly, the Company's activities have been accounted for as those of a "Development Stage Enterprise" as set forth in ASC 915 "Development Stage Entities", which was previously Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 7 ("SFAS 7").

FASB ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (formerly SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”) defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. The price in the principal (or most advantageous) market used to measure the fair value of the asset or liability shall not be adjusted for transaction costs. An orderly transaction is a transaction that assumes exposure to the market for a period prior to the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets and liabilities; it is not a forced transaction. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact and (iv) willing to transact.

F- 13

Solar Energy Limited

(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009

ASC 820 clarifies the definition of fair value of assets and liabilities, establishes a framework for measuring fair value of assets and liabilities and expands the disclosures on fair value measurements. The Company adopted the methods of fair value to value its financial assets and liabilities effective January 1, 2008 and, with respect to its non-financial assets and liabilities effective as of January 1, 2009, neither of which had a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the reporting date. ASC 820 establishes consistency and comparability by providing a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques into three broad levels, described below:

Level 1: Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. The Company has no Level 1 assets or liabilities; and

Level 2: Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. The Company has no Level 2 assets or liabilities; and

Level 3: Pricing inputs that are generally unobservable inputs and not corroborated by market data which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. The Company has no Level 3 assets or liabilities.

The December 31, 2009 financial statements include the accounts of Solar Energy Limited and its wholly owned subsidiaries: Hydro-Air Technologies, Inc.; Sunspring, Inc.; Renewable Energy Limited; and D2 Fusion. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation.

The Company accounts for income taxes as outlined in the ASC 740 "Income Taxes", which was previously Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 109, ("Accounting for Income Taxes" "Statement 109"). Under Statement 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under Statement 109, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. There were no current or deferred income tax expense or benefits due to the Company not having any material operations for the year ended December 31, 2009.

At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had gross deferred tax assets calculated at an expected rate of 35% of approximately $3,634,000 and $3,582,000, respectively, principally arising from net operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes. As management of the Company cannot determine that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefit of the deferred tax asset, a valuation allowance of $3,634,000 and $3,582,000 has been established at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

F- 14

Solar Energy Limited

(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009

The significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets at December 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:

In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-02, Consolidation (ASC 810): Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary. This amendment to ASC 810 clarifies, but does not change, the scope of current US GAAP. It clarifies the decrease in ownership provisions of ASC 810-10 and removes the potential conflict between guidance in that ASC and asset derecognition and gain or loss recognition guidance that may exist in other US GAAP. An entity will be required to follow the amended guidance beginning in the period that it first adopts FAS 160 (now included in ASC 810-10). For those entities that have already adopted FAS 160, the amendments are effective at the beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period ending on or after December 15, 2009. The amendments should be applied retrospectively to the first period that an entity adopts FAS 160. The adoption of ASU 2010-02 has had no material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operation, or cash flows.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-01, Equity (ASC 505): Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash (A Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). This amendment to ASC 505 clarifies the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a limit on the amount of cash that will be distributed is not a stock dividend for purposes of applying ASC 505 and ASC 260, and is effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009, and should be applied on a retrospective basis. The adoption of ASU 2010-01 has had no material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operation, or cash flows.

In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-17, Consolidations (ASC 810): Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities. This ASU amends the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for Statement 167. (See FAS 167 effective date below.)

In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-16, Transfers and Servicing (ASC 860): Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets. This Accounting Standards Update amends the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for Statement 166. (See FAS 166 effective date below.)

F- 15

Solar Energy Limited

(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-15, Accounting for Own-Share Lending Arrangements in Contemplation of Convertible Debt Issuance or Other Financing. This Accounting Standards Update amends the FASB Accounting Standard Codification for EITF 09-1. (See EITF 09-1 effective date below.)

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-14, Software (ASC 985): Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements. This update changed the accounting model for revenue arrangements that include both tangible products and software elements. The update is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2009-14 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company.

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (ASC 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements. This update addressed the accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or services (deliverables) separately rather than a combined unit and will be separated in more circumstances that under existing US GAAP. This amendment has eliminated that residual method of allocation. The update is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2009-13 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company.

In September 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-12, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820): Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent). This update provides amendments to ASC 820 for the fair value measurement of investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent). It is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. Early application is permitted in financial statements for earlier interim and annual periods that have not been issued. The adoption of ASU 2010-01 has had no material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operation, or cash flows.

In July 2009, the FASB ratified EITF No. 09-1, (ASC 470) “Accounting for Own-Share Lending Arrangements in Contemplation of Convertible Debt Issuance” (“EITF 09-1”). The provisions of EITF 09-1 clarify the accounting treatment and disclosure of share-lending arrangements that are classified as equity in the financial statements of the share lender. An example of a share-lending arrangement is an agreement between the Company (share lender) and an investment bank (share borrower) which allows the investment bank to use the loaned shares to enter into equity derivative contracts with investors. EITF 09-1 is effective for fiscal years that begin on or after December 15, 2009 and requires retrospective application for all arrangements outstanding as of the beginning of fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2009. Share-lending arrangements that have been terminated as a result of counterparty default prior to December 15, 2009, but for which the entity has not reached a final settlement as of December 15, 2009, are within the scope. EITF 09-1 is effective for share-lending arrangements entered into on or after the beginning of the first reporting period that begins on or after June 15, 2009. The adoption of EITF 09-1 has had no material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operation, or cash flows.

F- 16

Solar Energy Limited

(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles—a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162, which is codified in ASC 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. ASC 105 establishes the Codification as the source of authoritative GAAP in the United States (the “GAAP hierarchy”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. Once the Codification is in effect, all of its content will carry the same level of authority and the GAAP hierarchy will be modified to include only two levels of GAAP, authoritative and non-authoritative. ASC 105 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of ASC 105 has had no material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operation, or cash flows.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (“SFAS 167”) (ASC 810), which amends the consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities. The amendments significantly affect the overall consolidation analysis under ASC 810, Consolidation and require an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprise’s variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. SFAS 167 is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009 and early adoption is prohibited. The adoption of ASU 810 has had no material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operation, or cash flows.

In June, 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” (“SFAS 166”) (ASC 860). This statement removes the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and removes the exception from applying Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, to qualifying special-purpose entities. SFAS 166 is effective for financial asset transfers occurring after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009 and early adoption is prohibited. The adoption of ASC 860 has had no material affect on the Company’s financial statements.

The process of preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the use of estimates and assumptions regarding certain types of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. Such estimates primarily relate to unsettled transactions and events as of the date of the financial statements. Accordingly, upon settlement, actual results may differ from estimated amounts.

F- 17

Solar Energy Limited

(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009

On November 13, 2008, the Company sold its 45,000,000 restricted shares of Planktos Corp. to Maidon Services Limited for $200,000 of which $125,000 in cash was received on closing, $37,167 of assumed debt and $37,833 which was due within fourteen months with an option to convert into Planktos Corp. shares at $0.25 per share. As of December 31, 2009, the receivable was deemed non collectible and was written off as a bad debt.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As shown in the financial statements, the Company has limited cash, no revenues, a negative working capital of $1,163,860, and an accumulated deficit since the inception of $15,089,200. These factors indicate that the Company may be unable to continue in existence. The Company is currently seeking out a new business opportunity that might, if successful, mitigate these factors which raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans includes the following: (1) obtaining funding from private placement sources; (2) obtaining additional funding from the sale of the Company’s securities; and (3) obtaining loans and grants from various financial institutions, where possible. The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue existence.

During 2008, the Company received and cancelled 3,500,000 common shares as part of a separation agreement with the prior CEO related to the discontinued operations. As a result, the Company recognized a gain of $700,000.

The loan from Regal RV Resorts, Inc., a shareholder, as of December 31, 2008 was $376,521 of which $175,000 is uncollateralized and bears no interest while $201,521 of the loan is uncollateralized and bears 6% per annum and is due upon demand. During the year ended December 31, 2009, Regal loaned the Company an additional $29,925. The accrued interest owing on this loan at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $40,453 and $27,738, respectively.

This loan bears interest at 10% per year for a three year term. Principal and interest may be converted into common shares of the Company at an average trading price of the previous 10 days once the holder has given the Company notice of conversion. Upon such notice, the maximum conversion price is $0.75 per common share. The holder of the debenture also had the right, at its option, to convert the principal and interest amount due into CO2 tons at any time prior to the end of the three year term, at a rate of one United States Dollar ($1.00) per CO2 ton, subject to Company’s ability to deliver such CO2 tons at the time of conversion. During 2008, Planktos discontinued operations thus eliminating the conversion option into CO2 tons and the market price of the Company’s common stock at year end was below the conversion price of $0.75.

F- 18

Solar Energy Limited

(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009

The original $100,000 debenture was discounted by $29,551 in order to reflect the derivative portion of the note. During 2008, this discount was amortized by $18,739 to the full discounted derivative portion of $29,551 when Planktos discontinued operations. The loan matured on August 31, 2009 and has not been repaid. As of December 31, 2009, the Company owed $100,000 in principal and accrued interest of $34,657.

The Company uses Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718, Stock Compensation (formerly, FASB Statement 123R), to account for "fair value" for equity awards granted to employees and consultants.

A summary of the Company’s warrants at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 and the changes for 2009 are as follows:

During the year there were additional advances to the Company from Regal RV Resort, Inc. as detailed in Note 5 above. In addition the Company made payments to, or on behalf of, related parties, for administrative support; consulting; travel expenses paid for the Company’s former CEO; and legal fees. The legal fees were related to a claim which named the Company, the Company’s former CEO and Planktos Inc, a former subsidiary of the Company as defendants.

F- 19

Solar Energy Limited

(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009

Legal proceedings were initiated by Mary Ruth Ladd against the Company, Planktos Corp. (a former subsidiary) and certain individuals affiliated to the Company on October 3, 2007 in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco in connection with allegations of discrimination and retaliation against a whistle blower, wrongful termination, fraud, breach of contract, wrongful business acts and intentionally causing injury in the workplace. The claim seeks $58,280 in lost wages in addition to certain employee benefits and punitive damages. The Company has retained counsel to respond to these allegations and denies any liability for these alleged causes of action. As of the date of this filing, the Company has obtained a commitment by the plaintiff’s counsel to dismiss the case with prejudice, each party bearing its own costs and fees.

The Company has evaluated subsequent events from the balance sheet date through the date the financial statements were issued. Other than the events noted below, the Company is not aware of any subsequent events which would require recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.

On April 27, 2010 Company’s counsel obtained a commitment from plaintiff’s counsel that the suit initiated by Mary Ruth Ladd would be dismissed with prejudice, each party bearing its own costs and fees.

On April 7, 2010 the Company announced its intention to acquire Peloton Mining Inc. from a related party but is yet to execute a definitive agreement.

F- 20

ITEM 9 CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

In connection with the preparation of this annual report, an evaluation was carried out by the Company’s management, with the participation of the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”)) as of December 31, 2009. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management concluded, as of the end of the period covered by this report, that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective in recording, processing, summarizing, and reporting information required to be disclosed, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms, and such information was not accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process, under the supervision of the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s financial statements for external purposes in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

Due to its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

The Company’s management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). As a result of this assessment, management identified material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting.

A material weakness is a control deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.The material weaknesses as identified by management are disclosed below.

Lack of Appropriate Independent Oversight. The board of directors has not provided an appropriate level of oversight of the Company’s consolidated financial reporting and procedures for internal control over financial reporting since there are, at present, no independent directors who could provide an appropriate level of oversight, including challenging management’s accounting for and reporting of transactions. Our lack of appropriate independent oversight has been a material weakness since the resignation of two of our directors in the current annual period. While this control deficiency did not result in any audit adjustments to our 2009 or 2008 interim or annual financial statements, it could have resulted in material misstatement that might have been prevented or detected by independent oversight. Accordingly we have determined that this control deficiency constitutes a material weakness.

Failure to Segregate Duties. Management has not maintained any segregation of duties within the Company due to its reliance on a single individual to fill the role of chief executive officer, chief financial officer and principal accounting officer. Our failure to segregate duties has been a material weakness since the annual period ended December 31, 2004 through the annual period of this report. While this control deficiency did not result in any audit adjustments to our 2009 or 2008 interim or annual financial statements, it could have resulted in a material misstatement that might have been prevented or detected by a segregation of duties. Accordingly we have determined that this control deficiency constitutes a material weakness.

Sufficiency of Accounting Resources. The Company has limited accounting personnel, who are engaged under agreement, to prepare its financial statements, including the consolidation of the Company and its subsidiaries. The insufficiency of our accounting resources has been a material weakness since the annual period ended December 31, 2004 through the annual period of this report. While this control deficiency did not result in any audit adjustments to our 2009 or 2008 interim or annual financial statements, it did result in certain errors in the consolidation of the Company and its subsidiaries that were not detected by the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

As a result of the material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting described above, the Company’s management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2009, that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective based on the criteria in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the COSO.

The Company intends, as capital resources allow, to remedy its material weaknesses by:

Despite the Company’s intention to remedy its material weaknesses in the manner described, the actions required to accomplish these objectives will require the Company to engage additional personnel which actions may not be possible in the near term due to our limited financial resources and operations.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. We were not required to have, nor have we, engaged our independent registered public accounting firm to perform an audit of internal control over financial reporting pursuant to the rules of the Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

During the period ended December 31, 2009, there has been no change in internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

The following table sets forth the name, age and position of each director and executive officer of the Company:

Michael James Gobuty was appointed as chief executive officer, chief financial officer, principal accounting officer and as a director on September 12, 2008.

Mr. Gobuty earned a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Winnipeg. He was involved for many years as a consultant to the international garment industry based on years of experience in leather outerwear and sportswear. Mr. Gobuty has been active in hockey serving as team president and owner. He has also been involved in financing and developing real estate properties.

Mr. Gobuty also serves as the sole officer and director of Planktos Corp., which entity is without active operations, though subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

No other persons are expected to make any significant contributions to the Company’s executive decisions who are not executive officers or directors of the Company.

Our directors are appointed for a one (1) year term to hold office until the next annual meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance with our bylaws. Our executive officers are appointed by our Board of Directors and hold office until removed by the board.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between or among the directors or executive officers

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

To the best of our knowledge, during the past five years, none of the following occurred with respect to a present or former director, executive officer, or employee: (1) any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time; (2) any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offences); (3) being subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his or her involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; and (4) being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Commission or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated.

Based solely upon a review of Forms 3, 4 and 5 furnished to the Company, we are aware of the following person who, during the period ended December 31, 2009, failed to file, on a timely basis, reports required by Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics within the meaning of Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Code of Ethics applies to directors and senior officers, such as the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, controller, and persons performing similar functions. The Company has incorporated a copy of its Code of Ethics as Exhibit 14 to this form 10-K. Further, our Code of Ethics is available in print, at no charge, to any security holder who requests such information.

The board of directors has not established an audit committee. An audit committee typically reviews, acts on and reports to the board of directors with respect to various auditing and accounting matters, including the recommendations and performance of independent auditors, the scope of the annual audits, fees to be paid to the independent auditors, and internal accounting and financial control policies and procedures. Certain stock exchanges currently require companies to adopt a formal written charter that establishes an audit committee that specifies the scope of an audit committee’s responsibilities and the means by which it carries out those responsibilities. In order to be listed on any of these exchanges, the Company will be required to establish an audit committee. The board of directors has not established a compensation committee. The Company’s board of directors has not established a compensation committee.

Directors currently are not reimbursed for out-of-pocket costs incurred in attending meetings nor are they compensated for their service as directors. The Company may compensate directors in the future.

Since the Company has limited operations, it pays limited compensation to retain the services of its current executive officer. However, in the event that we expand our operations, the amount we deem appropriate to compensate our executive officer may change in accordance with market forces though we have no specific formula to determine future compensation at this time. Executive compensation may include salaries, options and other compensatory elements for our executive officer and any future executive employees. Decisions as to executive compensation would be based on the type of operations, the scale of those operations, and available capital resources.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company paid $4,000 in executive compensation in the form of consulting fees. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company incurred fees to its former chief executive officer pursuant to a consulting agreement with a related entity in the amount of $90,000. The consulting agreement with our former executive officer’s company was terminated by mutual agreement as of October 31, 2008, due to insufficient capital resources. The decrease in amounts paid in executive compensation can be attributed both to a state of limited operations and insufficient capital resources.

The following table provides summary information for the years 2009 and 2008 concerning cash and non-cash compensation paid or accrued by the Company to or on behalf of (i) the chief executive officer and (ii) any other employee to receive compensation in excess of $100,000.

* Appointed as chief executive officer, chief financial officer and principal accounting officer on September 10, 2008.

** Appointed as chief executive officer, chief financial officer and principal accounting officer on January 4, 2008 and resigned on September 10, 2008; Mr. Skalbania is the principal of Regal RV Resorts, Inc. which entity had a consulting agreement with the Company dated December 1, 2005 for $120,000 and 200,000 shares of common stock per year. The consulting agreement was mutually terminated on October 31, 2008 and shares entitled pursuant to this agreement were not issued to Mr. Skalbania.

The Company has no option or stock award plans and no outstanding option awards.

The Company has no plans that provides for the payment of retirement benefits, or benefits that will be paid primarily following retirement.

The Company has no agreement that provides for payment to our executive officer at, following, or in connection with the resignation, retirement or other termination, or a change in control of Company or a change in our executive officer's responsibilities following a change in control.

ITEM 12 SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the ownership of the Company’s 18,423,309 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of May 12, 2010, with respect to: (i) all directors; (ii) each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of our common stock; and (iii) our directors and executive officers as a group.

* Nelson Skalbania is the beneficial owner of 2,964,954 shares held in his own name, Regal RV Resorts, Inc., and Bay Cove Capital Corp.

ITEM 13 CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

None of our directors or executive officers, nor any proposed nominee for election as a director, nor any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, shares carrying more than 5% of the voting rights attached to all of our outstanding shares, nor any members of the immediate family (including spouse, parents, children, siblings, and in−laws) of any of the foregoing persons has any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction in the period covered by this report or in any presently proposed transaction which, in either case, has or will materially affect us, except as follows.

The Company paid $4,000 in consulting fees to Michael Gobuty, our sole officer and director in 2009 for services rendered as our sole executive officer.

The Company owed Regal RV Resorts, Inc. (“Regal”) $376,521 at December 31, 2008, due on demand consisting of loans and amounts due under a consulting agreement dated December 1, 2005, as amended, of which $175,000 bears no interest while $201,521 bears interest at 6% per annum. During the year ended December 31, 2009, Regal loaned the Company an additional $29,925. The accrued interest owing on the loan at December 31, 2009, was $40,453. In addition the Company made payments to, or on behalf of, Regal in the amount of $15,640 during the year ended December 31, 2009. Nelson Skalbania is the principal of Regal and is a former officer and director of the Company. He is also an affiliate owner of more than 10% of the Company’s common stock as a principal of Regal and Bay Cove Capital Corp.

The Company is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board inter-dealer quotation system, which does not have director independence requirements. However, for purposes of determining director independence, we have applied the definitions set out in NASDAQ Rule 4200(a)(15). NASDAQ Rule 4200(a)(15) states that a director is not considered to be independent if he or she is also an executive officer or employee of the corporation. We do not consider the Company to have any independent directors at this time.

BehlerMick P.S. (formerly Williams & Webster, P.S.), provided audit services in connection with its annual report for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. The aggregate of fees billed by BehlerMick, P.S. for the audit of the Company’s financial statements was $27,934 in 2009 and $34,500 in 2008.

BehlerMick, P.S., billed to the Company no fees in 2009 or 2008 for professional services that are reasonably related to the audit of the Company’s financial statements that are not disclosed in “Audit Fees” above.

BehlerMick, P.S., billed to the Company no fees in 2009 or 2008 for professional services rendered in connection with the preparation of the Company's tax return for the period.

BehlerMick, P.S., billed to the Company no fees in 2009 or 2008 for professional services rendered or any other services not disclosed above.

The Company does not have a standing audit committee. Therefore, all services provided to the Company by BehlerMick, P.S. were pre-approved by the Company’s board of directors. BehlerMick, P.S. performed all work only with their permanent full time employees.

The following documents are filed under “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” pages F-1 through F-20, and are included as part of this Form 10-K:

Financial Statements of The Company for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008:

Consolidated Statements of Income
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

The exhibits required to be attached by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed in the Index to Exhibits on page 27 of this Form 10-K, and are incorporated herein by this reference.

We are not filing any financial statement schedules as part of this Form 10-K because such schedules are either not applicable or the required information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

3(i) * Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-SB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 28, 1999).

3(ii) * By-laws (incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Form 10-SB filed with the Commission on January 28, 1999).

10(i) * Amendment to Consulting Agreement with Bay Cove Capital Corp. dated May 1, 2007(incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 10-QSB filed with the Commission on August 12, 2007).

10(ii) * Securities Exchange Agreement and Plan of Exchange with Enwin Resources, Inc. dated May 31, 2007 (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 4, 2007).

10(iii) * Release and Settlement Agreement with Russ George dated February 22, 2008 (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 21, 2008).

14 * Code of Ethics adopted March 30, 2004 (incorporated herein by reference to Form 10-KSB dated April 1, 2004).

21 * Subsidiaries (incorporated herein by reference to Form 10-K dated April 15, 2009).

31 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (attached).

32 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (attached).


		Page

PART I.
	Item 1. Business		3
	Item 1A. Risk Factors		8
	Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments		11
	Item 2. Properties		11
	Item 3. Legal Proceedings		11
	Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)		11
PART II.
	Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities		11
	Item 6. Selected Financial Data		13
	Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		13
	Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		17
	Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data		17
	Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure		18
	Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures		18
	Item 9B. Other Information		20
PART III.
	Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance		20
	Item 11. Executive Compensation		22
	Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters		23
	Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence		23
	Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services		24
PART IV.
	Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules		25
	Signatures		26

*Year*	*Quarter Ending*	*High*	*Low*
2009	December 31	$0.07	$0.04
	September 30	$0.08	$0.04
	June 30	$0.09	$0.04
	March 31	$0.10	$0.05
2008	December 31	$0.11	$0.04
	September 30	$0.20	$0.05
	June 30	$0.22	$0.08
	March 31	$0.23	$0.09

SOLAR ENERGY LIMITED (A Development Stage Company) CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

				December 31,		December 31,
				2009		2008

ASSETS

CURRENT ASSETS
	Cash		$	15	$	13,853
	Other receivable			-		37,833

		TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		15		51,686

TOTAL ASSETS			$	15	$	51,686



LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

CURRENT LIABILITIES
	Accounts payable and accrued expenses		$	122,977	$	96,934
	Accrued interest - related party			40,453		27,738
	Advances payable			459,342		439,842
	Note payable to related party			406,446		376,521
	Debenture payable, net of discount			100,000		100,000
	Accrued interest			34,657		26,008
		TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		1,163,875		1,067,043

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
	Common stock, 50,000,000 shares authorized; $0.0001 par value,
	18,423,309 issued and outstanding			1,842		1,842
	Additional paid-in capital			13,961,491		13,961,491
	Accumulated deficit during development stage			(15,127,193)		(14,978,690)
		TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT		(1,163,860)		(1,015,357)


TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT			$	15	$	51,686

SOLAR ENERGY LIMITED (A Development Stage Company) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


								From Inception
								(January 5,
								1994)
				Years Ended				through
				December 31,		December 31,		December 31,
				2009		2008		2009

REVENUES			$	-	$	-	$	-

EXPENSES
	General and administrative			107,638		291,559		6,328,546
	Research and development			-		-		2,671,638
	Impairment of patents			-		-		39,648
	Impairment of goodwill			-		-		14,118
		TOTAL EXPENSES		107,638		291,559		9,053,950

LOSS FROM OPERATIONS				(107,638)		(291,559)		(9,053,950)

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)
	Other income			-		-		349,886
	Financing costs			-		-		(1,477,800)
	Gain (loss) on investments			-		-		17,200
	Gain (loss) on sale or disposal of assets			-		-		(10,867)
	Gain (loss) on derivative instrument			-		-		29,551
	Gain on forgiveness of debt			-		-		172,227
	Interest income (expense), net			(40,865)		(28,406)		(153,647)
	Amortization of discount on debenture payable			-		(18,739)		(29,551)
	Gain (loss) on sale of subsidiary			-		-		120,711
		TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)		(40,865)		(47,145)		(982,290)

LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS				(148,503)		(338,704)		(10,036,240)

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
	Gain (Loss) on discontinued operations			-		734,538		(5,090,953)

NET INCOME (LOSS)			$	(148,503)	$	395,834	$	(15,127,193)

	NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE, CONTINUING
		OPERATIONS, BASIC AND DILUTED	$	(0.01)	$	(0.02)
	NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE, DISCONTINUED
		OPERATIONS, BASIC	$	0.00	$	0.04
	NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE, DISCONTINUED
		OPERATIONS, DILUTED	$	0.00	$	0.03

	NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE, BASIC		$	(0.01)	$	0.02
	NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE, DILUTED		$	(0.01)	$	0.02

	WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON
		SHARES OUTSTANDING, BASIC		18,423,309		19,398,719
	WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON
		SHARES OUTSTANDING, DILUTED		18,423,309		21,148,719

SOLAR ENERGY LIMITED (A Development Stage Company) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

										Deficit
										Accumulated
						Additional		Share		During		Total
		Common Stock				Paid-in		Subscriptions		Development		Stockholders'
		Shares		Amount		Capital		Received		Stage		Equity

Balance, January 5, 1994 (Inception)		-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-

	1/5/94 Stock issued for Organization Costs	125,000		13		2,487		-		-		2,500
	Net Loss for the Year Ended December 31, 1994	-		-		-		-		(500)		(500)
Balance, December 31, 1994		125,000		13		2,487		-		(500)		2,000

	Net Loss for the Year Ended December 31, 1995	-		-		-		-		(500)		(500)
Balance, December 31, 1995		125,000		13		2,487		-		(1,000)		1,500

	10/96 Shares Issued for Cash at $20.00 Per Share	1,300		1		25,999		-		-		26,000
	11/96 Shares Issued for Cash at $0.90 Per Share	831		-		763		-		-		763
	12/96 Shares Issued for Cash at $2.00 Per Share	125		-		251		-		-		251
	Stock Split Rounding Adjustment	595		(1)		1		-		-		-
	Net Loss for the Year Ended December 31, 1996	-		-		-		-		(24,013)		(24,013)
Balance, December 31, 1996		127,851		13		29,501		-		(25,013)		4,501

	Net Loss for the Year Ended December 31, 1997	-		-		-		-		(4,000)		(4,000)
Balance, December 31, 1997		127,851		13		29,501		-		(29,013)		501

	1/98 Shares Issued for Acquisition of Hydro-Air Technologies, Inc.	70,400		7		(7)		-		-		-
	6/98 Shares Issued for Cash at $1.00 Per Share	780,000		78		779,922		-		-		780,000
	7/98 Shares Issued for Cash at $10.00 Per Share	12,500		1		124,999		-		-		125,000
	11/98 Shares Issued for Cash at $1.00 Per Share	200,000		20		199,980		-		-		200,000
	Net Loss for the Year Ended December 31, 1998	-		-		-		-		(939,446)		(939,446)
Balance, December 31, 1998		1,190,391		119		1,134,394		-		(968,459)		166,054

	1/99 Shares Issued for Cash at $10.00 Per Share	10,000		1		99,999		-		-		100,000
	1/99 Shares Issued for Acquisition of Renewable Energy Corporation at $12.00/ Share	35,000		4		419,996		-		-		420,000
	10/99 Shares Issued for Cash at $1.80 Per Share	80,000		8		143,990		-		-		143,998
	Net Loss for the Year Ended December 31, 1999	-		-		-		-		(957,086)		(957,086)
Balance, December 31, 1999		1,315,391	$	132	$	1,798,379	$	-	$	(1,925,545)	$	(127,034)

Balance forward, December 31, 1999		1,315,391	$	132	$	1,798,379	$	-	$	(1,925,545)	$	(127,034)

	Net Loss for the Year Ended December 31, 2000	-		-		-		-		(925,899)		(925,899)
Balance, December 31, 2000		1,315,391		132		1,798,379		-		(2,851,444)		(1,052,933)

	7/01 Shares Issued for Rounding in Connection with 10:1 Exchange	35,396		4		(4)		-		-		-
	8/01 Shares Issued for Cash at $0.23 Per Share	350,000		35		81,215		-		-		81,250
	10/01 Shares Issued for Cash at $0.25 Per Share	50,000		5		12,495		-		-		12,500
	10/01 Shares Issued to Settle Debt at $0.33 Per Share	1,507,739		151		502,808		-		-		502,959
	10/01 Shares Issued for Services at $0.33 Per Share	113,682		11		37,504		-		-		37,515
	11/01 Shares Issued for Cash at $0.51 Per Share	275,000		27		141,223		-		-		141,250
	Net Loss for the Year Ended December 31, 2001	-		-		-		-		(465,476)		(465,476)
Balance, December 31, 2001		3,647,208		365		2,573,620		-		(3,316,920)		(742,935)

	8/02 Shares Issued for Cash at $0.30 Per Share	56,113		5		16,995		-		-		17,000
	Net Loss for the Year Ended December 31, 2002	-		-		-		-		(213,045)		(213,045)
Balance, December 31, 2002		3,703,321		370		2,590,615		-		(3,529,965)		(938,980)

	1/03 Shares Issued For Cash at $0.30 Per Share	23,000		2		6,898		-		-		6,900
	2/03 Shares Issued For Cash at $0.30 Per Share	60,000		6		17,994		-		-		18,000
	9/03 Shares Issued to Settle Debt at $0.30 Per Share	2,734,954		274		820,213		-		-		820,487
	10/03 Shares Issued for Services at $0.20 Per Share	200,000		20		39,980		-		-		40,000
	10/03 Shares Issued for Cash at $0.30 Per Share	150,000		15		44,985		-		-		45,000
	Net Loss for the Year Ended December 31, 2003	-		-		-		-		(281,905)		(281,905)
Balance, December 31, 2003		6,871,275		687		3,520,685		-		(3,811,870)		(290,498)

	3/04 Shares Issued to For Cash at $0.20 Per Share	450,000		45		89,955		-		-		90,000
	5/04 Shares Issued for Cash at $0.25 Per Share	200,000		20		49,980		-		-		50,000
	Net Loss for the Year Ended December 31, 2004	-		-		-		-		(91,450)		(91,450)
Balance, December 31, 2004		7,521,275	$	752	$	3,660,620	$	-	$	(3,903,320)	$	(241,948)

Balance forward, December 31, 2004		7,521,275	$	752	$	3,660,620	$	-	$	(3,903,320)	$	(241,948)

	1/05 Shares Issued For Services at $0.21 Per Share	600,000		60		125,940		-		-		126,000
	3/05 Shares Issued For Cash at $0.20 Per Share	25,000		3		4,997		-		-		5,000
	5/05 Shares Issued For Cash at $0.20 Per Share	700,000		70		139,930		-		-		140,000
	5/05 Fair Value of Warrants issued at $0.25 per warrant	-		-		182,200		-		-		182,200
	6/05 Shares Issued For Cash at $0.25 Per Share	400,000		40		99,960		-		-		100,000
	6/05 Shares Issued For Cash at $0.35 Per Share	50,000		5		61,996		-		-		62,001
	7/05 Shares Issued For Cash at $0.20 Per Share	180,000		18		35,982		-		-		36,000
	7/05 Fair Value of Warrants issued at $0.25 per warrant	-		-		71,200		-		-		71,200
	8/05 Shares Issued For Cash at $0.20 Per Share	100,000		10		19,990		-		-		20,000
	8/05 Fair Value of Warrants issued at $0.25 per warrant	-		-		46,900		-		-		46,900
	8/05 Shares Issued For Services at $0.58 Per Share	500,000		50		289,950		-		-		290,000
	10/05 Shares Issued For Services at $1.20 Per Share	105,000		10		125,990		-		-		126,000
	10/05 Shares Issued For Cash at $0.20 Per Share	40,000		4		7,996		-		-		8,000
	10/05 Shares Issued For Cash at $0.35 Per Share	200,000		20		69,980		-		-		70,000
	10/05 Fair Value of Warrants issued at $0.40 per warrant	-		-		128,400		-		-		128,400
	10/05 Subscriptions received	-		-		-		20,000		-		20,000
	11/05 Shares Issued For Acquisitions of Planktos, Inc. at $1.00 Per Share	1,500,000		150		1,499,850		-		-		1,500,000
	11/05 Shares Issued For Acquisitions of D2Fusion, Inc. at $1.00 Per Share	2,000,000		200		1,999,800		-		-		2,000,000
	12/05 Shares Issued For Cash at $0.20 Per Share	705,000		71		140,929		-		-		141,000
	12/05 Fair Value of Warrants issued at $0.25 per warrant	-		-		350,400		-		-		350,400
	12/05 Shares Issued For Cash at $0.35 Per Share	300,000		30		104,970		-		-		105,000
	12/05 Fair Value of Warrants issued at $0.40 per warrant	-		-		184,400		-		-		184,400
	Net Loss for the Year Ended December 31, 2005	-		-		-		-		(6,602,698)		(6,602,698)
Balance, December 31, 2005		14,926,275	$	1,493	$	9,352,380	$	20,000	$	(10,506,018)	$	(1,132,145)

Balance forward, December 31, 2005		14,926,275	$	1,493	$	9,352,380	$	20,000	$	(10,506,018)	$	(1,132,145)

	2/06 Shares Issued For Cash at $0.25 Per Share	705,000		70		176,180		-		-		176,250
	3/06 Shares Issued For Cash at $0.25 Per Share	80,000		8		19,992		(20,000)		-		-
	3/06 Shares Issued For Cash at $0.40 Per Share	20,000		2		7,998		-		-		8,000
	5/06 Shares and Warrants Issued for Cash at $0.33 Per Unit	500,000		50		164,950		-		-		165,000
	6/06 Shares Issued For Cash at $0.28 Per Share	3,540,212		354		1,001,853		-		-		1,002,207
	7/06 Shares Issued For Cash at $0.27 Per Share	66,222		6		17,961		-		-		17,967
	8/06 Shares Issued For Cash at $0.27 Per Share	4,100		1		1,106		-		-		1,107
	8/06 Shares and Warrants Issued for Cash at $0.35 Per Unit	31,500		3		11,022		-		-		11,025
	Net loss, year ended December 31, 2006	-		-		-		-		(1,608,683)		(1,608,683)
Balance, December 31, 2006		19,873,309		1,987		10,753,442		-		(12,114,701)		(1,359,272)

	5/07 Shares and Warrants Issued for Cash at $0.35 Per Unit	342,857		34		119,966		-				120,000
	5/07 Shares and Warrants Issued for Debt at $0.35 Per Unit	807,143		81		282,419		-				282,500
	5/07 Shares Issued For Cash at $0.25 Per Share	500,000		50		124,950		-				125,000
	5/7/07 Fair Value of Warrants issued at $0.40 per warrant	-		-		489,600		-				489,600
	5/07 Shares Issued For Services at $0.50 Per Share	300,000		30		149,970		-				150,000
	8/9/07 reverse acquisition of Planktos Corp.	-		-		2,691,104		-				2,691,104
	10/1/07 Fair Value of Warrants issued at $0.40 per warrant	-		-		24,700		-				24,700
	10/07 Shares Issued For Cash at $0.25 Per Share	100,000		10		24,990		-				25,000
	Net Loss for the Year Ended December 31, 2007	-		-		-		-		(3,259,823)		(3,259,823)
Balance, December 31, 2007		21,923,309		2,192		14,661,141		-		(15,374,524)		(711,191)

	4/11/08 Fair value of shares received in separation agreement and intangible assets	(3,500,000)		(350)		(699,650)		-				(700,000)
	Net Income for the Year Ended December 31, 2008	-		-		-		-		395,834		395,834
Balance, December 31, 2008		18,423,309		1,842		13,961,491		-		(14,978,690)		(1,015,357)

	Net Loss for the Year Ended December 31, 2009									(148,503)		(148,503)
Balance, December 31, 2009		18,423,309	$	1,842	$	13,961,491	$	-	$	(15,127,193)	$	(1,163,860)

Continued

CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Issued stock for cash		-		-		3,917,469
	Cash received from related party notes payable and advances		29,925		-		1,720,268
	Cash repaid to related party notes payable and advances		-		(184,138)		(290,500)
	Proceeds from debenture payable		-		-		100,000
	Cash received from advances by shareholders		-		-		2,044,099
	Cash paid on debt financing		-		-		(1,388,178)
	Discontinued operations		-		-		(100,000)
	Net cash provided (used) by financing activities		29,925		(184,138)		6,003,158

	NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH		(13,838)		207,687		15

CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD			13,853		67,355		-

CASH, END OF PERIOD		$	15	$	275,042	$	15

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
	Interest paid	$	-	$	-	$	17,195
	Income taxes paid	$	-	$	-	$	-

	December 31, 2009	December 31, 2008

Net Operating Losses Carryforward Cumulative	$ 10,382,000	$ 10,233,000


Gross deferred tax assets (liabilities):
Deferred tax asset before allowance	$ 3,634,000	$ 3,582,000
Valuation allowance	(3,634,000)	(3,582,000)
Net deferred tax asset	$ -	$ -

		Weighted	Weighted
		Average	Average
	Warrants	Exercise	Remaining
	Outstanding	Price	Life

Balance, December 31, 2008	1,250,000	0.40	0.37
Issued	-	-	-
Expired	(1,250,000)	(0.40)	-

Balance December 31, 2009	-	$ -	-

	December 31, 2009	December 31, 2008
Administrative support	$ 1,000	$ 42,100
Consulting	4,000	90,000
Legal fees	10,100	5,000
Travel expenses	540	30,275
	$ 15,640	$ 167,375

*Name*	*Age*	Year Elected/Appointed	*Positions Held*
Michael James Gobuty	71	2008	CEO, CFO, PAO and Director

*Summary Compensation Table***
Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Michael James Gobuty* CEO, CFO, and PAO	2009 2008	- -	- -	- -	- -	- -	- -	4,000 -	4,000 -
Nelson Skalbania** CEO, CFO, and PAO	2009 2008	- -	- -	- -	- -	- -	- -	- 90,000**	- 90,000

*Names and Addresses of Managers and Beneficial Owners*	*Title of Class*	*Number of Shares*	Percent of Class
Michael James Gobuty 73200 El Paseo, Suite 2H Palm Desert, California 92260	Common	0	0
Nelson Skalbania* 145-925 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3L2	Common	300,000	14.4
Regal RV Resorts, Inc.* 145-925 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3L2	Common	1,350,000	7.3
Bay Cove Capital Corp.* 7371 Brandywine Place Vancouver, British Columbia V5S 3Z7	Common	1,314,954	7.1
Central Shipping Investment, Inc. 145-925 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3L2	Common	1,410,000	7.7
Officer and Directors as a Group (1)	Common	0	0%