þ Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008.

o Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from to .

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes þ No o.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): Yes o No þ

At May 20, 2008, the number of shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock, $0.0001 par value (the only class of voting stock), was 18,423,309.

As used herein, the terms “Company,” “we,” “our,” “us,” “it,” and “its” refer to Solar Energy Limited, a Delaware corporation, unless otherwise indicated. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited financial statements included in this Form 10-Q reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the periods presented. The results of operations for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Solar Energy Limited

(A Development Stage Company)

Condensed Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2008

Solar Energy Limited (the “Company”) is in the development stage according to Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 7 and is currently focusing its attention on raising capital in order to pursue its goals.

The Company was originally incorporated as Taurus Enterprises, Inc. under the laws the State of Delaware on January 5, 1994. In August of 1996, the Company merged with Salvage World, Inc., a private company, changed its name to “Salvage World, Inc.”, and reincorporated in the state of Nevada. On December 17, 1997, the Company merged with a Delaware corporation, named Solar Energy Limited, organized on July 24, 1997. The Company then changed its name to “Solar Energy Limited.” The surviving corporation is a Delaware corporation and the authorized shares were changed to 50,000,000 par value $0.0001.

These unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q of Regulation S-K. They may not include all information and footnotes required by United States generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. However, except as disclosed herein, there has been no material changes in the information disclosed in the notes to the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The interim unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with those financial statements included in the Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation, consisting solely of normal and recurring adjustments have been made. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2008.

This summary of significant accounting policies of Solar Energy Limited is presented to assist in understanding the Company’s financial statements. The financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.

The Company’s financial statements are prepared using the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments and short-term debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents at well-known, quality financial institutions in the United States and Canada. As of March 31, 2008, $62,652 exceeded Federally insured limits.

Solar Energy Limited

(A Development Stage Company)

Condensed Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2008

The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended by SFAS No. 137, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – Deferral of the Effective Date of FASB No. 133”, SFAS No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities”, and SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, which is effective for the Company as of its inception. These statements establish accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities. They require that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet and measure those instruments at fair value.

If certain conditions are met, a derivative may be specifically designated as a hedge, the objective of which is to match the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging derivative with the recognition of (i) the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk or (ii) the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transaction. For a derivative not designated as a hedging instrument, the gain or loss is recognized in income in the period of change. Historically, the Company has not entered into derivatives contracts to hedge existing risks or for speculative purposes.

During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company issued a debenture for a total of $100,000. The debenture included provisions for the conversion of the debt and interest into shares of the Company’s common stock or into CO2 Tonnes. As of March 31, 2008, the right to convert the debenture into CO2 Tonnes has been terminated after Planktos, Inc. suspended its operations and sold its research and development assets. As a result, the Company no longer accounts for its convertible debt contract as containing a derivative instrument.

The Company has been in the development stage since inception. The Company has no revenues from its planned operations. The Company is in the development stage according to Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 7 and is currently focusing its attention on raising capital in order to pursue its goals.

Solar Energy Limited

(A Development Stage Company)

Condensed Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2008

As of March 31, 2008, the Company had outstanding common stock options of 500,000 and common stock warrants of 1,781,500. The above common stock equivalents were deemed to be antidilutive for the three months ended March 31, 2008.

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) SFAS No.157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). The provisions of SFAS 157 are applicable to all of the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured and recorded at fair value. SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants. SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that gives the highest priority to observable inputs and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy defined by SFAS 157 are described below.

Level 1: Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2: Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3: Pricing inputs that are generally unobservable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

The Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2008. The Company did not have any fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the three months ended March 31, 2008.

The March 31, 2008 financial statements include the accounts of Solar Energy Limited and its wholly owned subsidiaries: Hydro; Sunspring; REEL; and D2 Fusion, Inc. plus 54% of Planktos Corp. post acquisition. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation.

Income taxes are provided based upon the liability method of accounting pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under this approach, deferred income taxes are recorded to reflect the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-end. A valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets if management does not believe the Company has met the “more likely than not” standard imposed by SFAS No. 109 to allow recognition of such an asset.

Solar Energy Limited

(A Development Stage Company)

Condensed Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2008

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 which amends and expands the disclosure requirements of SFAS 133 to provide an enhanced understanding of an entity’s use of derivative instruments, how they are accounted for under SFAS 133 and their effect on the entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The provisions of SFAS 161 are effective for the period beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company is currently reviewing the effect, if any, that the adoption of this statement will have on our financial statements.

The process of preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the use of estimates and assumptions regarding certain types of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. Such estimates primarily relate to unsettled transactions and events as of the date of the financial statements. Accordingly, upon settlement, actual results may differ from estimated amounts.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As shown in the financial statements, the Company has limited cash, no revenues, and an accumulated deficit since the inception of the Company. These factors indicate that the Company may be unable to continue in existence. The Company is currently putting business plans in place which will, if successful, mitigate these factors which raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue existence.

                                                              2008           2007

Research Vessel “Weatherbird II”       $       -            $ 800,000
Marine Equipment                                         -                23,306
                                                                  -            823,306
Accumulated Depreciation                             -                35,745
Net Vessel & Equipment                       $       -           $ 787,561

On February 28, 2008, the Company completed the sale of the Weatherbird II for cash proceeds of $1,000,000. As a result, the Company recorded a gain of $212,439 in discontinued operations.

Solar Energy Limited

(A Development Stage Company)

Condensed Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2008

A loan from Bay Cove Investments, Ltd., a shareholder, is uncollateralized, bears interest at 6% per annum and is due upon demand. The loan balance, including accrued interest of $13,218, at April 30, 2007 was $211,478. On May 1, 2007, Bay Cove Investments, Ltd. assigned this loan to Regal RV Resorts, Inc.

The loan from Regal RV Resorts, Inc., a shareholder, includes the $211,478 assignment of debt from Bay Cove Capital Corp., additional advances of $681,354, and a $371,500 repayment for a total owing of $521,332. Of this $521,332 loan, $97,511 is uncollateralized and bears no interest while $423,821 of the loan is uncollateralized and bears 6% per annum and is due upon demand. The accrued interest owing on this loan at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was $15,945 and $10,892, respectively.

This loan bears interest at 10% per year for a three year term, as of March 31, 2008, the carrying value of the debenture is the principal of $100,000 plus accrued interest of $16,939.

The Company did not issue any new stock options or warrants in the quarter ended March 31, 2008.

In December 2007, the Company’s majority owned subsidiary, Planktos Corp., suspended its Iron-Fertilization Prove-Out operations and initiated negotiations for the sale of the related assets (See Note 1). Accordingly, this business component has been presented as discontinued operations within the consolidated financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “ Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” and EITF 03-13. As discussed in Note 1, Planktos Corp was engaged in research related to creation and sales of “Kyoto Protocol” certified emission reduction credits.

The loss from disposal of discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2007 includes Planktos operations of $2,841,810 and the recognition of previously recorded deferred revenues of $250,000 and provision for loss on contract of $967,500.

The loss on discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2008 includes Planktos’ loss from operations of $331,318 and the recognition of a $212,439 gain from the sale of the Weatherbird II.

Subsequent to March 31, 2008 the Company submitted 3,500,000 shares of its common stock for cancellation and return to authorized share capital in accord with a Release and Settlement Agreement with Russ George, the former CEO and owner of Planktos, Inc. dated February 22, 2008.

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other parts of this quarterly report contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements can also be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “believes,” “plans,” “predicts,” and similar terms. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and our actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences include but are not limited to those discussed in the subsection entitled Forward-Looking Statements and Factors That May Affect Future Results and Financial Condition below. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto included in this report. Our fiscal year end is December 31. All information presented herein is based on the three month period ended March 31, 2008.

The following discussion is subject to us obtaining sufficient financing to resume our plan of operation as all prior activities have either been terminated or suspended pending financing. All references made to research and development operations relate to the activities of our subsidiaries or other entities with which we contract. All of our projects have been experimental in nature and virtually all of the financing raised to date has been either allocated to or related to research and the development activities.

Since 1997 the Company has focused on innovative solutions for global issues related to water, energy and pollution as a research and development incubator of (i) cost-effective renewable energy sources that do not threaten the environment, and (ii) practical solutions to mitigate the effects of traditional energy sources’ unintended consequences concerning global climate change.

Currently, our primary intention is to secure sufficient financing to resume research and development activities that might demonstrate the pragmatic use of unproven solid state nuclear fusion. While major energy research organizations and government agencies are accelerating efforts to develop new forms of nuclear energy only solid-state fusion offers potentially limitless energy without radioactivity or nuclear waste. Our experiments with solid-state nuclear fusion indicate to us that the Company is well positioned to ultimately substantiate the feasibility of commercializing solid-state fusion.

We intend to develop our solid state fusion program in Los Alamos, New Mexico, with scientists and engineers working toward the delivery of proprietary solid-state fusion aimed at entry level heat and energy applications for homes and industry. Solid-state fusion is a solid state, low temperature, non-radioactive nuclear reaction that fuses two heavy hydrogen nuclei into a helium atom and releases enormous amounts of heat. The technology is more widely recognized under the name “cold-fusion.”

Unlike the reactions in “cold-fusion,” we have in the past used more simple and reliable solid state processes more akin to high temperature super-conductor physics to produce and control radiation-free fusion reactions known as “LENR” or Low Energy Nuclear Reaction in the Solid State. In this most simple form of fusion, the process of LENR fuses two Deuterium atoms (heavy Hydrogen) that are contained and constrained under solid-state conditions fuse to form a single Helium-4 isotope (4He) but since the mass of one 4H atom is slightly less than two Deuterium atoms, each new helium atom created is accompanied by a release of energy. To put this into a more common perspective, under ideal conditions one gram of hydrogen fuel holds the equivalent to billions of watts (joules) of energy.

Our team in Los Alamos intends to develop working prototypes that can demonstrate LENR. We expect that these prototypes will be further tested and refined by outside research groups. Our ultimate goal is to produce heat and electricity at a fraction of today’s cost with zero harmful emissions.

First discovered in the 1930s then re-discovered and announced in 1989, this safe, low-cost technology seemed to answer all society's prayers for a clean and abundant new energy source. To some, however, it appeared to violate conventional physics and threaten entrenched energy industries, and it was for a time denounced as impossible. Now, after more than 17 years of painstaking research and experimentation, this enigmatic new phenomenon has finally given up enough secrets to allow development of laboratory applications. Upon completion of a consumer model, multi-kilowatt devices will be able to permeate society, enhancing the economy, environment, and self-sufficiency of countless nations around the globe.

The Company is well aware of the controversy surrounding “cold fusion” efforts in the United States and abroad. However, we believe that there is sufficient global evidence that the risk/reward ratio merits our continued investment in the pursuit of this technology. In the event that we are able to advance our prototype technology to commercial application, such an advance could help solve much of the world’s energy, and pollution problems.

The Company’s plan of operation with respect to developing a cold fusion program will require $500,000 in new financing over the next twelve months which financing is not currently available.

During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company focused on resuming research and development activities in connection with cold fusion technologies, discontinued “iron-fertilization” prove out measures in connection with Planktos Corp., divested substantially all of the assets of Planktos Corp. and pursued financing commitments for its ongoing plan of operation.

Net Losses

For the period from January 5, 1994 to March 31, 2008 the Company recorded a net loss of $15,669,105. Net losses for the three months ended March 31, 2008 were $294,581 as compared to $904,459 for the three months ended March 31, 2007. The decrease in net losses in the current period can be attributed to the discontinuation of “iron-fertilization” prove out measures that decreased both general and administrative and research and development expenses in addition to relative inactivity in respect to our “cold fusion” research and development program. We expect to continue to incur losses over the next twelve months as the Company intends to resume its “cold fusion” research and development program and reconsiders objectives related to Planktos Corp.

During 2007 Planktos, the Company’s majority owned subsidiary purchased a research vessel for $800,000 which vessel was sold during the current three month period ended March 31, 2008 for $1,000,000. Otherwise, the Company has expended no significant amount on capital expenditures for the period from inception to March 31, 2008.

The Company has a prospective income tax benefit resulting from a net operating loss carryforward and start up costs that could offset future operating profits.

The Company believes that inflation has had a negligible effect on operations over the past three years.

The Company is in the development stage and, since inception, has experienced significant changes in liquidity, capital resources and stockholders’ equity. We have been funded since inception from public or private debt or equity placements or by major shareholders in the form of loans.

Cash flow used in operating activities was $8,790,098 for the period from inception to March 31, 2008. Cash flow used in operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $608,175 as compared to cash flow used in operating activities of $877,374 for the three months ended March 31, 2007. The decrease in cash flow used in operating activities in the current period was due primarily to a decrease in general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses, in addition to the decrease in expenses incurred by the research vessel formerly owned by Planktos Corp.

Cash flow provided by investing activities was $3,039,745 for the period from inception to March 31, 2008. Cash flow provided by investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $1,000,000 as compared to cash flow provided by investing activities of $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Cash flows provided by investing activities can be attributed to the sale of the research vessel formerly owned by Planktos Corp.

Cash flow provided by financing activities was $6,025,395 for the period from inception to March 31, 2008. Cash used in financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $184,138 as compared to cash provided by financing activities of $725,250 for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Cash flow used in financing activities in the current period can be attributed to the repayment of related party loans and advances.

The Company had a working capital deficit of $827,433 as of March 31, 2008, down from $1,342,027 as of December 31, 2007. As of March 31, 2008 our total assets totaled $281,258 and our current assets totaled $276,538, consisting primarily of cash. As of March 31, 2008 our current liabilities totaled $1,103,971, which included a note payable to a related party of $521,332, advances payable of $384,875, and accounts payable with accrued expenses of $176,230. Long term liabilities totaled $116,939. Net stockholders' deficit in the Company was $939,652 as of March 31, 2008, up from $711,191 at December 31, 2007.

The Company’s current assets are insufficient to conduct our plan of operation over the next twelve months and we will have to seek additional debt or equity financing to fund operations. The Company has no current commitments or arrangements with respect to, or immediate sources of funding. Further, no assurances can be given that funding is available or available to the Company on acceptable terms. The Company’s shareholders would be the most likely source of new funding in the form of loans or equity placements though none have made any commitment for future investment and we have no agreement formal or otherwise. The Company’s inability to obtain funding has had a material adverse affect on our plan of operation and will continue to diminish our ongoing businesses.

The Company does not expect to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

The Company had no lines of credit or other bank financing arrangements as of March 31, 2008.

The Company has no defined benefit plan or contractual commitment with any of its officers or directors.

The Company has no current plans for the purchase or sale of any plant or equipment.

The Company currently has no employees and has no plans to hire any employees in the near future.

As of March 31, 2008, we have no significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources that is material to stockholders.

In the notes to the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007 included in the Company’s Form 10-K, the Company discussed those accounting policies that are considered to be significant in determining the results of operations and our financial position. We believe that the accounting principles utilized by us conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The preparation of financial statements requires management to make significant estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to bad debts, inventories, intangible assets, warranty obligations, product liability, revenue, and income taxes. We base our estimates on historical experience and other facts and circumstances that are believed to be reasonable, and the results form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities. The actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The Company owns 53% of Planktos Corp. The 47% minority in the subsidiary is owned by various unrelated parties. The minority holders are not expected to make additional capital contributions.

The Company’s audit expressed substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern as a result of recurring losses, lack of revenue-generating activities and an accumulated deficit of $15,374,524 as of December 31, 2007. Our accumulated deficit increased to $15,669,105 as of March 31, 2008. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is subject to our ability to obtain funding from outside sources. Management’s plan to address our ability to continue as a going concern, include: (i) obtaining funding from private placement sources; (ii) obtaining additional funding from the sale of our securities; (iii) generating revenues from the commercialization of its research and development projects; and (iv) obtaining loans and grants from various financial institutions, where possible. Although management believes that it will be able to obtain the necessary funding to allow us to remain a going concern through the methods discussed above, there can be no assurances that such methods will prove successful.

Forward Looking Statements and Factors That May Affect Future Results and Financial Condition

The statements contained in the section titled “Results of Operations” and “Description of Business”, with the exception of historical facts, are forward looking statements. A safe-harbor provision may not be applicable to the forward looking statements made in this current report Forward looking statements reflect our current expectations and beliefs regarding our future results of operations, performance, and achievements. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and are based upon assumptions and beliefs that may or may not materialize. These statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning:

· our ability to raise additional capital to fund cash requirements for future operations;

We wish to caution readers that our operating results are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those discussed or anticipated, including the factors set forth in the section entitled “Risk Factors” included elsewhere in this report. We also wish to advise readers not to place any undue reliance on the forward looking statements contained in this report, which reflect our beliefs and expectations only as of the date of this report. We assume no obligation to update or revise these forward looking statements to reflect new events or circumstances or any changes in our beliefs or expectations, other than is required by law.

We have adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) (SFAS No. 123R), Share-Based Payment, which addresses the accounting for stock-based payment transactions in which an enterprise receives employee services in exchange for (a) equity instruments of the enterprise or (b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprise’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments. In January 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107, which provides supplemental implementation guidance for SFAS No. 123R. SFAS No. 123R eliminates the ability to account for stock-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic value method under Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and instead generally requires that such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value-based method. We use the Black-Scholes-Merton (“BSM”) option-pricing model to determine the fair-value of stock-based awards under SFAS No. 123R, consistent with that used for pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. We have elected the modified prospective transition method as permitted by SFAS No. 123R and accordingly prior periods have not been restated to reflect the impact of SFAS No. 123R. The modified prospective transition method requires that stock-based compensation expense be recorded for all new and unvested stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and employee stock purchase plan shares that are ultimately expected to vest as the requisite service is rendered beginning on January 1, 2006, the first day of our fiscal year 2006. Stock-based compensation expense for awards granted prior to January 1, 2006 is based on the grant date fair-value as determined under the pro forma provisions of SFAS No. 123.

Prior to the adoption of SFAS No 123R, we measured compensation expense for our employee stock-based compensation plans using the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25. We applied the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123 as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure, as if the fair-value-based method had been applied in measuring compensation expense. Under APB Opinion No. 25, when the exercise price of the Company’s employee stock options was equal to the market price of the underlying stock on the date of the grant, no compensation expense was recognized.

We account for equity instruments issued in exchange for the receipt of goods or services from other than employees in accordance with SFAS No. 123 and the conclusions reached by the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) in Issue No. 96-18. Costs are measured at the estimated fair market value of the consideration received or the estimated fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The value of equity instruments issued for consideration other than employee services is determined on the earliest of a performance commitment or completion of performance by the provider of goods or services as defined by EITF 96-18.

In connection with the preparation of this report on Form 10-Q, an evaluation was carried out by the Company’s management, with the participation of the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”)). Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management concluded, as of the end of the period covered by this report, that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in recording, processing, summarizing, and reporting information required to be disclosed, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms.

There have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the period ended March 31, 2008, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Legal proceedings were initiated by Mary Ruth Ladd against the Company, Planktos Corp. and certain individuals affiliated to the Company on October 3, 2007 in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco in connection with allegations of discrimination and retaliation against a whistle blower, wrongful termination, fraud, breach of contract, wrongful business acts and intentionally causing injury in the workplace. The claim seeks $58,280 in lost wages in addition to certain employee benefits and punitive damages. The Company has retained counsel to respond to these allegations and denies any liability for these alleged causes of action.

The Company’s operations and securities are subject to a number of risks. Below we have identified and discussed the material risks that we are likely to face. Should any of the following risks occur, they will adversely affect our operations, business, financial condition and/or operating results as well as the future trading price and/or the value of our securities.

The Company’s auditors included an explanatory statement in Note 2 of their report of financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, stating that there are certain factors which raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These factors include a lack of revenue generating activities in place and losses since inception.

Our majority owned subsidiary Planktos Corp. has essentially suspended all operations and its ability to continue is in doubt.

During December of 2007, Planktos Corp. suspended “iron-fertilization” prove out efforts and commenced efforts to wind down its operations including the sale of assets and termination of employees. Planktos Corp.’s limited financial resources and absence of ongoing business operations place its, and our own, ongoing operation in doubt.

We have a history of significant operating losses and such losses may continue in the future

Since our inception in 1994, our operations have resulted in a continuation of losses and an accumulated deficit which reached $15,669,105 at March 31, 2008. The Company has never realized revenue from operations. We will continue to incur operating losses. Our only expectation of future profitability is dependent upon the success of our subsidiaries’ programs and research and development. Therefore, we may never be able to achieve profitability.

Our business will not likely be profitable in the next twelve months and may never be profitable.

Our research and development operations are either suspended or remain in the early development stage and as such we have limited expectation of realizing profitable operations within the next twelve months or ever. Any possibility of future profit as the result of our operations remains purely speculative.

We will need additional financing to fund our businesses.

We will need additional capital to resume our research and development operations In our efforts to raise capital or obtain additional financing, we may be obligated to issue additional shares of common stock or warrants or other rights to acquire common stock on terms that will result in dilution to existing shareholders or place restrictions on operations. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, our ability to fund our operations would be significantly limited.

The market for our common stock has been limited due to low trading volume and the small number of brokerage firms acting as market makers. Because of the limitations of our market and volatility of the market price of our stock, investors may face difficulties in selling shares at attractive prices when they want to. The average daily trading volume for our stock has varied significantly from week to week and from month to month, and the trading volume often varies widely from day to day.

We may incur significant expenses as a result of being quoted on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board, which may negatively impact our financial performance.

We incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses as a result of being listed on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as related rules implemented by the Commission has required changes in corporate governance practices of public companies. We expect that compliance with these laws, rules and regulations, including compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as discussed in the following risk factor, may substantially increase our expenses, including our legal and accounting costs, and make some activities more time-consuming and costly. As a result, there may be a substantial increase in legal, accounting and certain other expenses in the future, which would negatively impact our financial performance and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Our internal controls over financial reporting may not be considered effective in the future, which could result in a loss of investor confidence in our financial reports and in turn have an adverse effect on our stock price.

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 we are required to furnish a report by our management on our internal controls over financial reporting. Such report must contain, among other matters, an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as of the end of the year, including a statement as to whether or not our internal controls over financial reporting are effective. This assessment must include disclosure of any material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting identified by management. If we are unable to continue to assert that our internal controls are effective, our investors could lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline.

The Company does not pay dividends. We have not paid any dividends since inception and have no intention of paying any dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future dividends would be at the discretion of our board of directors and would depend on, among other things, future earnings, our operating and financial condition, our capital requirements, and general business conditions. Therefore, shareholders should not expect any type of cash flow from their investment.

There can be no guarantee that we will not require additional funds, either through additional equity offerings or debt placements, in order to expand our operations. Such additional capital may result in dilution to our current shareholders. Further, our ability to meet short-term and long-term financial commitments will depend on future cash. There can be no assurance that future income will generate sufficient funds to enable us to meet our financial commitments.

The Company’s shareholders may face significant restrictions on their stock.

The Company’s stock differs from many stocks in that it is a “penny stock.” The Commission has adopted a number of rules to regulate “penny stocks” including, but not limited to, those rules from the Securities Act as follows:

3a51-1 which defines penny stock as, generally speaking, those securities which are not listed on either NASDAQ or a national securities exchange and are priced under $5, excluding securities of issuers that have net tangible assets greater than $2 million if they have been in operation at least three years, greater than $5 million if in operation less than three years, or average revenue of at least $6 million for the last three years;

15g-1 which outlines transactions by broker/dealers which are exempt from 15g-2 through 15g-6 as those whose commissions from traders are lower than 5% total commissions;

15g-2 which details that brokers must disclose risks of penny stock on Schedule 15G;

15g-3 which details that broker/dealers must disclose quotes and other information relating to the penny stock market;

15g-5 which explains that compensation of persons associated in connection with penny stock sales must be disclosed;

15g-6 which outlines that broker/dealers must send out monthly account statements; and

Since the Company’s securities constitute a “penny stock” within the meaning of the rules, the rules would apply to us and our securities. Because these rules provide regulatory burdens upon broker-dealers, they may affect the ability of shareholders to sell their securities in any market that may develop; the rules themselves may limit the market for penny stocks. Additionally, the market among dealers may not be active. Investors in penny stock often are unable to sell stock back to the dealer that sold them the stock. The mark-ups or commissions charged by the broker-dealers may be greater than any profit a seller may make. Because of large dealer spreads, investors may be unable to sell the stock immediately back to the dealer at the same price the dealer sold the stock to the investor. In some cases, the stock may fall quickly in value. Investors may be unable to reap any profit from any sale of the stock, if they can sell it at all. Shareholders should be aware that, according to Commission Release No. 34-29093 dated April 17, 1991, the market for penny stocks has suffered from patterns of fraud and abuse. These patterns include:

Exhibits required to be attached by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed in the Index to Exhibits on page 24 of this Form 10-Q, and are incorporated herein by this reference.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Nelson Skalbania
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer

3(i) * Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-SB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 28, 1999).

3(ii) * By-laws (incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Form 10-SB filed with the Commission on January 28, 1999).

10(i) * Stock Purchase Agreement dated April 27, 2004 between Renewable Energy Limited, Los Alamos Renewable Energy , LLC, Renewable Energy Corporation and the Company (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-QSB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 24, 2004).

10(ii) * Acquisition Agreement with Planktos, Inc., dated August 10, 2005 (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 19, 2005).

10(iii) * Acquisition Agreement with D2Fusion Inc., dated August 18, 2005 (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 19, 2005).

10(iv) * Iron-Fertilization Prove-Out and Purchase Agreement with Planktos Corp. (formerly Diatom Corporation), dated August 18, 2005 (incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 19, 2005).

10(v) * Consulting Agreement with Bay Cove Capital Corp. dated December 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 10-QSB filed with the Commission on August 12, 2007).

10(vi) * Securities Exchange Agreement and Plan of Exchange with Planktos Corp. (formerly Diatom Corporation) dated January 12, 2007 (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 19, 2007).

10(vii) * Amendment to Consulting Agreement with Bay Cove Capital Corp. dated May 1, 2007(incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 10-QSB filed with the Commission on August 12, 2007).

10(viii) * Securities Exchange Agreement and Plan of Exchange with Enwin Resources, Inc. dated May 31, 2007 (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 4, 2007).

10(ix) * Release and Settlement Agreement with Russ George dated February 22, 2008 (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 21, 2008).

14 * Code of Ethics adopted March 30, 2004 (incorporated herein by reference to Form 10-KSB dated April 1, 2004).

21 * Subsidiaries (incorporated herein by reference to Form 10-K dated April 14, 2008).




PART I. - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		3
		Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2008 (unaudited) and December 31, 2007	4
		Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three month periods ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007 and the period from inception	5
		Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three month periods ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007 and the period from inception	6
		Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	8
	ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		13
	ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		18
	ITEM 4T. Controls and Procedures		18



PART II. - OTHER INFORMATION
	ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings		19
	ITEM 1A. Risk Factors		19
	ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		22
	ITEM 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities		22
	ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securities Holders		22
	ITEM 5. Other Information		22
	ITEM 6. Exhibits		22
	Signatures		23
Index to Exhibits			24

SOLAR ENERGY LIMITED (A Development Stage Company) CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

				March 31,		December 31,
				2008		2007
				(Unaudited)
ASSETS

CURRENT ASSETS
	Cash		$	275,042	$	67,355
	Prepaid expenses			1,496		-
		TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		276,538		67,355

OTHER ASSETS
	Deposits			4,720		4,720
	Vessels and other fixed assets, net of depreciation			-		787,561

TOTAL ASSETS			$	281,258	$	859,636

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

CURRENT LIABILITIES
	Accounts payable and accrued expenses		$	176,230	$	294,850
	Accrued interest - related party			15,945		10,892
	Other current liabilities			5,589		13,295
	Advances payable			384,875		480,013
	Note payable - related party			521,332		610,332
		TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		1,103,971		1,409,382

LONG-TERM LABILITIES
	Debenture payable			100,000		81,261
	Accrued interest			16,939		14,064
		TOTAL LONG-TERM LIABILITIES		116,939		95,325

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
	Minority interest			-		66,120
				-		66,120
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
	Common stock, 50,000,000 shares authorized; $0.0001 par
	value, 21,923,309 and 21,923,309 shares issued and outstanding, respectively			2,192		2,192
	Additional paid-in capital			14,727,261		14,661,141
	Accumulated deficit during development stage			(15,669,105)		(15,374,524)
		TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT		(939,652)		(711,191)

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY			$	281,258	$	859,636

SOLAR ENERGY LIMITED (A Development Stage Company) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

								From Inception
								(January 5,
								1994)
				Three Months Ended				through
				March 31,		March 31,		March 31,
				2008		2007		2008
				(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)

REVENUES			$	-	$	-	$	-

EXPENSES
	General and administrative			176,745		502,396		6,106,094
	Vessel operating costs			-		253,849		-
	Research and development			2,012		110,899		2,673,650
	Impairment of patents			-		-		39,648
	Impairment of goodwill			-		-		3,514,118
		TOTAL EXPENSES		178,757		867,144		12,333,510

LOSS FROM OPERATIONS				(178,757)		(867,144)		(12,333,510)

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)
	Other income			22,600		-		372,486
	Financing costs			-		-		(1,477,800)
	Charitable contribution			-		(25,000)		-
	Gain (loss) on investments			-		-		17,200
	Gain (loss) on sale or disposal of assets			-		-		(10,867)
	Gain (loss) on derivative instrument			-		(6,390)		29,551
	Gain on forgiveness of debt			-		-		172,227
	Interest income (expense), net			(19,545)		(5,925)		(103,921)
	Amortization of discount on debenture payable			-		-		(10,812)
	Provision for loss on contract			-		-		(967,500)
	Gain (loss) on sale of subsidiary			-		-		120,711
		TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)		3,055		(37,315)		(1,858,725)

LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS				(175,702)		(904,459)		(14,192,235)

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
	Loss on discontinued operations			(118,879)		-		(1,476,870)

NET LOSS			$	(294,581)	$	(904,459)	$	(15,669,105)

NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE, CONTINUING
		OPERATIONS, BASIC AND DILUTED	$	(0.01)	$	(0.05)
NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE, DISCONTINUED
		OPERATIONS, BASIC AND DILUTED	$	(0.01)	$	0.00
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER
		OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING,
		BASIC AND DILUTED		21,923,309		19,873,309

SOLAR ENERGY LIMITED (A Development Stage Company) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

									From Inception
									(January 5,
									1994)
					Three Months Ended				through
					March 31,		March 31,		March 31,
					2008		2007		2008
					(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)

CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
	Net loss			$	(175,702)	$	(904,459)	$	(14,192,235)
	Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
	(Net of Acquisition/Sale)
		Amortization and depreciation			-		-		212,809
		Amortization on discount of debentures			18,739		1,927		29,551
		Bad debt			-		-		250,000
		Stock issued for services			-		-		856,851
		Services for pre-paid expense			-		-		169,165
		(Gain) Loss on derivative			-		6,390		(29,551)
		Stock issued for R&D expenses			-		-		439,900
		Loss on sale of assets			-		-		10,867
		Gain on investments			-		-		(17,199)
		Gain on sale of subsidiary			-		-		(120,711)
		Gain on forgiveness of debt			-		-		(172,227)
		Impairment of patents			-		-		39,648
		Financing costs			-		-		1,477,800
		Impairment of goodwill			-		-		3,514,118
		Provision for loss on contract			-		-		967,500
		Minority interest			-		-		(123,856)
		(Increase) decrease in:
			Accounts receivable		-		-		39
			Deposits		-		-		(24,883)
			Prepaid expenses		(1,496)		7,812		21,004
		Increase (decrease) in:
			Accounts payable		(118,620)		(17,802)		219,902
			Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		222		28,758		272,099
			Deferred revenues		-		-		250,000
			Minority interest		-		-		66,120
		Net cash used in continuing operating activities			(276,857)		(877,374)		(5,883,289)
		Net cash used in discontinued operating activities			(331,318)		-		(2,906,809)
		Net cash used in operating activities			(608,175)		(877,374)		(8,790,098)
(The interim consolidated statements of cash flows are continued on the next page.) The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
	Cash acquired from sale of subsidiary			-		-		180,000
	Cash acquired (sold) from subsidiary			-		-		3,221,116
	Cash paid to subsidiary			-		-		(107,568)
	Cash paid to RECO and Sunspring			-		-		(2,076)
	Cash paid for patent costs			-		-		(106,318)
	Cash received (paid) for property & equipment			1,000,000		-		131,428
	Cash paid for deposits			-		-		(4,837)
	Cash received on sale of assets			-		-		23,000
	Cash paid for notes receivable			-		-		(295,000)
		Net cash provided by investing activities		1,000,000		-		3,039,745

CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Issued stock for cash			-		-		3,917,469
	Cash received from (repaid to) related party notes payable and advances			(184,138)		725,250		1,352,005
	Stock subscription			-		.		-
	Proceeds from debenture payable			-		-		100,000
	Cash received from advances by shareholders			-		-		2,044,099
	Cash paid on debt financing			-		-		(1,388,178)
	Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities			(184,138)		725,250		6,025,395

	NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH			207,687		(152,124)		275,042

CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD				67,355		203,912		-

CASH, END OF PERIOD			$	275,042	$	51,788	$	275,042

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
	Interest paid		$	-	$	-	$	17,195
	Income taxes paid		$	-	$	-	$	-