XML 69 R28.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
FAIR VALUE
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2015
FAIR VALUE

NOTE 21 – FAIR VALUE

 

Fair Value Measurement

 

The FASB authoritative guidance for fair value measurement defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. This guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy for classifying financial instruments. The hierarchy is based on whether the inputs to the valuation techniques used to measure fair value are observable or unobservable. Three levels of inputs may be used to measure fair value:

 

 

Level 1Valuations of Level 1 assets and liabilities are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities include equity securities that trade in an active exchange market, as well as certain U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government and agency securities and corporate debt securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active markets. 
Level 2Valuations of Level 2 assets and liabilities are based on observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities include (i) mortgage-backed securities for which the fair value is estimated based on the value of identical or comparable assets, (ii) debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments, and (iii) derivative contracts whose value is determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. 
Level 3Valuations of Level 3 assets and liabilities are based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined by using pricing models for which the determination of fair value required significant management judgments estimation. 
   

For 2015, there have been no transfers into or out of Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

 

Investment securities available for sale

 

The fair value of investment securities was the market value based on quoted market prices (as is the case with equity securities, Treasury notes, and non-callable U.S. Agency debt securities), when available (Level 1), or market prices for identical or comparable assets (as is the case with MBS and callable U.S. agency debt) that are based on observable market parameters, including benchmark yields, reported trades, quotes from brokers or dealers, issuer spreads, bids, offers and reference data including market research operations (Level 2). Observable prices in the market already consider the risk of nonperformance. If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair value is based upon models that use unobservable inputs due to the limited market activity of the instrument, as is the case with certain private label mortgage-backed securities held by the Corporation (Level 3).

 

Private label MBS are collateralized by fixed-rate mortgages on single-family residential properties in the United States; the interest rate on the securities is variable, tied to 3-month LIBOR and limited to the weighted average coupon of the underlying collateral. The market valuation represents the estimated net cash flows over the projected life of the pool of underlying assets applying a discount rate that reflects market observed floating spreads over LIBOR, with a widening spread based on a nonrated security. The market valuation is derived from a model that utilizes relevant assumptions such as prepayment rate, default rate, and loss severity on a loan level basis. The Corporation modeled the cash flow from the fixed-rate mortgage collateral using a static cash flow analysis according to collateral attributes of the underlying mortgage pool (i.e., loan term, current balance, note rate, rate adjustment type, rate adjustment frequency, rate caps, and others) in combination with prepayment forecasts obtained from a commercially available prepayment model (ADCO). The variable cash flow of the security is modeled using the 3-month LIBOR forward curve. Loss assumptions were driven by the combination of default and loss severity estimates, taking into account loan credit characteristics (loan-to-value, state, origination date, property type, occupancy loan purpose, documentation type, debt-to-income ratio, and other) to provide an estimate of default and loss severity. Refer to the table below for further information regarding qualitative information for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3).

 

Derivative instruments

 

The fair value of most of the Corporation's derivative instruments is based on observable market parameters and takes into consideration the credit risk component of paying counterparties, when appropriate, except when collateral is pledged. That is, on interest rate swaps, the credit risk of both counterparties is included in the valuation; and, on options and caps, only the seller's credit risk is considered. The derivative instruments, namely swaps and caps, were valued using a discounted cash flow approach using the related LIBOR and swap rate for each cash flow. Derivatives include interest rate swaps used for protection against rising interest rates. For these interest rate swaps, a credit component was not considered in the valuation since the Corporation has fully collateralized with investment securities any marked-to-market loss with the counterparty and, if there were market gains, the counterparty had to deliver collateral to the Corporation.

 

Although most of the derivative instruments are fully collateralized, a credit spread is considered for those that are not secured in full. The cumulative mark-to-market effect of credit risk in the valuation of derivative instruments for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 was immaterial.

 

 

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, are summarized below:
                        
 As of March 31, 2015 As of December 31, 2014
 Fair Value Measurements Using  Fair Value Measurements Using
(In thousands)Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Assets/Liabilities at Fair Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Assets/Liabilities at Fair Value
                        
Assets:                       
Securities available for sale :                       
U.S. Treasury Securities$ 7,500 $ - $ - $ 7,500 $ 7,499 $ - $ - $ 7,499
Noncallable U.S. agency debt  -   286,066   -   286,066   -   228,157   -   228,157
Callable U.S. agency debt and MBS  -   1,607,273   -   1,607,273   -   1,653,140   -   1,653,140
Puerto Rico government obligations  -   39,073   2,390   41,463   -   40,658   2,564   43,222
Private label MBS  -   -   31,824   31,824   -   -   33,648   33,648
Other investments held for sale  -   -   100   100   -   -   -   -
Derivatives, included in assets:                       
Interest rate swap agreements  -   -   -   -   -   33   -   33
Purchased interest rate cap agreements  -   1   -   1   -   6   -   6
Liabilities:                       
Derivatives, included in liabilities:                       
Interest rate swap agreements   -   -   -   -   -   33   -   33
Written interest rate cap agreement  -   1   -   1   -   6   -   6
Forward contracts  -   220   -   220   -   148   -   148
                        

The table below presents a reconciliation of all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

 

  Total Fair Value Measurements
   Quarter ended March 31,
  2015 2014
Level 3 Instruments OnlySecurities  Securities
(In thousands)Available For Sale(1) Available For Sale(1)
       
Beginning balance$ 36,212   43,292
Total gains (losses) (realized/unrealized):     
Included in earnings  (156)   -
Included in other comprehensive income  619   964
Held-to-Maturity investment securities reclassified to Available-for-Sale     
Sales     
Purchases  100   5,123
Principal repayments and amortization  (2,461)   (1,869)
Ending balance$ 34,314 $ 47,510
       
(1)Amounts mostly related to private label MBS.
  

The table below presents qualitative information for significant assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) at March 31, 2015:
         
 March 31, 2015
(In thousands)Fair Value Valuation Technique Unobservable Input Range
         
Investment securities available-for-sale:
         
Private label MBS$ 31,824 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 14.5%
      Prepayment rate 18.04% -100.00% (Weighted Average 32%)
      Projected Cumulative Loss Rate 0.00% -80.00% (Weighted Average 7.3%)
         
Puerto Rico Government Obligations  2,390 Discounted cash flow Prepayment speed 2.89%
         
         
         

Information about Sensitivity to Changes in Significant Unobservable Inputs

 

Private label MBS: The significant unobservable inputs in the valuation include probability of default, the loss severity assumption, and prepayment rates. Shifts in those inputs would result in different fair value measurements. Increases in the probability of default, loss severity assumptions, and prepayments rates in isolation would generally result in an adverse effect on the fair value of the instruments. Meaningful and possible shifts of each input were modeled to assess the effect on the fair value estimation.

 

Puerto Rico Government Obligations: The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement is the assumed prepayment rate. A significant increase (decrease) in the assumed rate would lead to a higher (lower) fair value estimate. Loss severity and probability of default are not included as significant unobservable variables because the notes are guaranteed by the Puerto Rico Housing Finance Authority (“PRHFA”). The PRHFA credit risk is modeled by discounting the cash flows using a curve appropriate to the PRHFA credit rating.

 

 

The table below summarizes changes in unrealized gains and losses recorded in earnings for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 for Level 3 assets and liabilities that are still held at the end of each period:
       
   Changes in Unrealized Losses  Changes in Unrealized Losses
   (Quarter ended March 31, 2015)  (Quarter Ended March 31, 2014)
Level 3 Instruments OnlySecurities  Securities
(In thousands)Available For Sale Available For Sale
       
Changes in unrealized losses relating to assets still held at reporting date:     
Net impairment losses on investment securities (credit component) $ (156)  $ -
      
  

Additionally, fair value is used on a nonrecurring basis to evaluate certain assets in accordance with GAAP. Adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of lower-of-cost or market accounting (e.g., loans held for sale carried at the lower-of-cost or fair value and repossessed assets) or write downs of individual assets (e.g., goodwill, loans).

 

As of March 31, 2015, impairment or valuation adjustments were recorded for assets recognized at fair value on a non-recurring basis as shown in the following table:
             
  Carrying value as of March 31, 2015 Losses recorded for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2015
  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3   
   (In thousands)   
             
Loans receivable (1)$ - $ - $ 436,944 $ (13,725)
Other Real Estate Owned (2)  -   -   122,628   (2,711)
Mortgage servicing rights (3)  -   -   22,973   (38)
Loans Held For Sale (4)  -   -   54,588   -
             
(1)Mainly impaired commercial and construction loans. The impairment was generally measured based on the fair value of the collateral. The fair values were derived from external appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of the collateral (e.g., absorption rates), which are not market observable.
(2)The fair value was derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of the properties (e.g., absorption rates and net operating income of income producing properties), which are not market observable. Losses were related to market valuation adjustments after the transfer of the loan to the OREO portfolio.
(3)Fair value adjustments to mortgage servicing rights were mainly due to assumptions associated with mortgage prepayment rates. The Corporation carries its mortgage servicing rights at the lower of cost or market, measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. Assumptions for the value of mortgage servicing rights included: Prepayment rate-10.25%, Discount Rate-10.62%.
(4)The value of these loans was derived from external appraisals, adjusted for specific characteristics of the loans, and, for loans with signed sale agreements, the value was determined based on the sales price in such agreements.

As of March 31, 2014, impairment or valuation adjustments were recorded for assets recognized at fair value on a non-recurring basis as shown in the following table:
             
  Carrying value as of March 31, 2014 (Losses) Gain recorded for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2014
  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3   
  (In thousands)   
             
             
Loans receivable (1)$ - $ - $ 478,393 $ (23,793)
Other Real Estate Owned (2)  -   -   138,622   (4,747)
Mortgage servicing rights (3)  -   -   22,026   (219)
Loans Held For Sale (4)  -   -   54,755   -
             
(1) Mainly impaired commercial and construction loans. The impairment was generally measured based on the fair value of the collateral. The fair values were derived from external appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of the collateral (e.g. absorption rates), which are not market observable.
(2)The fair value was derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of the properties (e.g., absorption rates and net operating income of income producing properties), which are not market observable. Losses were related to market valuation adjustments after the transfer of the loan to the OREO portfolio.
(3)Fair value adjustments to the mortgage servicing rights were mainly due to assumptions associated with mortgage prepayments rates. The Corporation carries its mortgage servicing rights at the lower-of-cost or market, measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. Assumptions for the value of mortgage servicing rights included: Prepayment Rate-9.10%, Discount Rate-10.61%.
(4)The value of these loans was derived from external appraisals, adjusted for specific characteristics of the loans, and, for loans with signed sale agreements, the value was determined based on the sales price in such agreements.

Qualitative information regarding the fair value measurements for Level 3 financial instruments is as follows:
    
 March 31, 2015
 Method Inputs
LoansIncome, Market, Comparable Sales, Discounted Cash Flows External appraised values; probability weighting of broker price opinions; management assumptions regarding market trends or other relevant factors
OREOIncome, Market, Comparable Sales, Discounted Cash Flows External appraised values; probability weighting of broker price opinions; management assumptions regarding market trends or other relevant factors
Mortgage servicing rightsDiscounted Cash Flow Weighted average prepayment rate of 10.25%; weighted average discount rate of 10.62%

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments that are not measured or reported at fair value on a recurring basis or reported at fair value on a non-recurring basis. The estimated fair value was calculated using certain facts and assumptions, which vary depending on the specific financial instrument.

 

Cash and due from banks and money market investments

 

The carrying amounts of cash and due from banks and money market investments are reasonable estimates of their fair value. Money market investments include held-to-maturity securities, which have a contractual maturity of three months or less. The fair value of these securities is based on quoted market prices in active markets that incorporate the risk of nonperformance.

 

Other equity securities

 

Equity or other securities that do not have a readily available fair value are stated at their net realizable value, which management believes is a reasonable proxy for their fair value. This category is principally composed of stock that is owned by the Corporation to comply with FHLB regulatory requirements. The realizable value of the FHLB stock equals its cost as this stock can be freely redeemed at par.

 

Loans receivable, including loans held for sale

 

The fair value of loans held for investment and of mortgage loans held for sale was estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms and credit quality and with adjustments that the Corporation's management believes a market participant would consider in determining fair value. Loans were classified by type, such as commercial, residential mortgage, and automobile. These asset categories were further segmented into fixed- and adjustable-rate categories. Valuations are carried out based on categories and not on a loan-by-loan basis. The fair values of performing fixed-rate and adjustable-rate loans were calculated by discounting expected cash flows through the estimated maturity date. This fair value is not currently an indication of an exit price as that type of assumption could result in a different fair value estimate. The fair value of credit card loans was estimated using a discounted cash flow method and excludes any value related to a customer account relationship. Other loans with no stated maturity, like credit lines, were valued at book value. Prepayment assumptions were considered for non-residential loans. For residential mortgage loans, prepayment estimates were based on a prepayments model that combined both a historical calibration and current market prepayment expectations. Discount rates were based on the U.S. Treasury and LIBOR/Swap Yield Curves at the date of the analysis, and included appropriate adjustments for expected credit losses and liquidity. For impaired collateral dependent loans, the impairment was primarily measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observable transactions involving similar assets in similar locations. The market valuation of the loans acquired from Doral Bank in the first quarter of 2015 was derived from a model of forecasted cash flows that uses market-driven assumptions such as prepayment rate, default rate, and loss severity on a loan level basis. The forecasted cash flows are then discounted by yields observed in sales of similar portfolios in Puerto Rico and the continental U.S. 

 

Deposits

 

The estimated fair value of demand deposits and savings accounts, which are deposits with no defined maturities, equals the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair values of retail fixed-rate time deposits, with stated maturities, are based on the present value of the future cash flows expected to be paid on the deposits. The cash flows were based on contractual maturities; no early repayments were assumed. Discount rates were based on the LIBOR yield curve.

 

The estimated fair value of total deposits excludes the fair value of core deposit intangibles, which represents, the value of the customer relationship measured by the value of demand deposits and savings deposits that bear a low or zero rate of interest and do not fluctuate in response to changes in interest rates.

 

The fair value of brokered CDs, which are included within deposits, is determined using discounted cash flow analyses over the full term of the CDs. The fair value of the CDs is computed using the outstanding principal amount. The discount rates used were based on brokered CD market rates as of March 31, 2015. The fair value does not incorporate the risk of nonperformance, since interests in brokered CDs are generally sold by brokers in amounts of less than $250,000 and, therefore, are insured by the FDIC.

 

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

 

Some repurchase agreements reprice at least quarterly, and their outstanding balances are estimated to be their fair value. Where longer commitments are involved, fair value is estimated using exit price indications of the cost of unwinding the transactions as of the end of the reporting period. The brokers who are the counterparties provide these indications. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are fully collateralized by investment securities.

 

Advances from FHLB

 

The fair value of advances from FHLB with fixed maturities is determined using discounted cash flow analyses over the full term of the borrowings, using indications of the fair value of similar transactions. The cash flows assume no early repayment of the borrowings. Discount rates are based on the LIBOR yield curve. Advances from FHLB are fully collateralized by mortgage loans and, to a lesser extent, investment securities.

 

Other borrowings

 

Other borrowings consist of junior subordinated debentures. Projected cash flows from the debentures were discounted using the Bloomberg BB Finance curve plus a credit spread. This credit spread was estimated using the difference in yield curves between swap rates and a yield curve that considers the industry and credit rating of the Corporation as issuer of the note at a tenor comparable to the time to maturity of the debentures.

 

The following table presents the estimated fair value and carrying value of financial instruments as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014
               
 Total Carrying Amount in Statement of Financial Condition March 31, 2015 Fair Value Estimated March 31, 2015 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
               
 (In thousands)
               
Assets:              
Cash and due from banks and money               
market investments$ 984,436 $ 984,436 $ 984,436 $ - $ -
Investment securities available               
for sale  1,974,226   1,974,226   7,500   1,932,412   34,314
Other equity securities  26,185   26,185   -   26,185   -
Loans held for sale  81,723   82,942   -   28,301   54,641
Loans held for investment  9,485,372            
Less: allowance for loan and lease losses  (226,064)            
Loans held for investment, net of allowance$ 9,259,308   9,115,707   -   -   9,115,707
Derivatives, included in assets  1   1   -   1   -
               
Liabilities:              
Deposits  9,841,038   9,852,630   -   9,852,630   -
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase  900,000   966,365   -   966,365   -
Advances from FHLB  325,000   326,087   -   326,087   -
Other borrowings  231,959   169,935   -   -   169,935
Derivatives, included in liabilities  221   221   -   221   -
               

          
               
 Total Carrying Amount in Statement of Financial Condition December 31, 2014 Fair Value Estimated December 31, 2014 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
 (In thousands)
               
Assets:              
Cash and due from banks and money               
market investments$ 796,108 $ 796,108 $ 796,108 $ - $ -
Investment securities available               
for sale  1,965,666   1,965,666   7,499   1,921,955   36,212
Other equity securities  25,752   25,752   -   25,752   -
Loans held for sale  76,956   77,888   -   23,247   54,641
Loans held for investment  9,262,436            
Less: allowance for loan and lease losses (222,395)            
Loans held for investment, net of allowance$ 9,040,041   8,844,659   -   -   8,844,659
Derivatives, included in assets  39   39   -   39   -
               
Liabilities:              
Deposits  9,483,945   9,486,325   -   9,486,325   -
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase  900,000   958,715   -   958,715   -
Advances from FHLB  325,000   324,376   -   324,376   -
Other borrowings  231,959   162,344   -   -   162,344
Derivatives, included in liabilities  187   187   -   187   -