XML 31 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
Fair Value
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2011
Fair Value [Abstract]  
Fair Value
4.
FAIR VALUE

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received in the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.  There is a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which categorizes the inputs used in measuring fair value.  These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs for which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.

The following table represents the Company's fair value hierarchy for its financial assets (cash, cash equivalents and investments) and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2011 (in thousands):

   
Level 1
  
Level 2
  
Level 3
  
Total
 
Assets:
            
Cash
 $52,643  $¾  $¾  $52,643 
Money market funds
  246,545   ¾   ¾   246,545 
Commercial paper
  248,429   ¾   ¾   248,429 
Corporate debt securities
  ¾   3,542   ¾   3,542 
Government-sponsored enterprise obligations
  ¾   63   ¾   63 
Auction rate securities
  ¾   ¾   29,014   29,014 
Total assets measured at fair value
 $547,617  $3,605  $29,014  $580,236 
Liabilities:
                
Deferred consideration
 $¾  $¾  $2,786  $2,786 
Total liabilities measured at fair value
 $¾  $¾  $2,786  $2,786 
 
The following table represents the Company's fair value hierarchy for its financial assets (cash, cash equivalents and investments) and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2010 (in thousands):

   
Level 1
  
Level 2
  
Level 3
  
Total
 
Assets:
            
Cash
 $55,496  $¾  $¾  $55,496 
Money market funds
  150,909   ¾   ¾   150,909 
Collateralized debt obligations
  ¾   46   ¾   46 
Corporate debt securities
  ¾   3,603   ¾   3,603 
Government-sponsored enterprise obligations
  ¾   73   ¾   73 
Auction rate securities
  ¾   ¾   29,189   29,189 
Total assets measured at fair value
 $206,405  $3,722  $29,189  $239,316 
Liabilities:
                
Deferred consideration
 $¾  $¾  $3,222  $3,222 
Total liabilities measured at fair value
 $¾  $¾  $3,222  $3,222 

The Company's Level 2 assets consist of collateralized debt obligations, corporate debt securities and government-sponsored enterprise obligations, which do not have directly observable quoted prices in active markets.  The Company's Level 2 assets are valued using matrix pricing.

The Company's Level 3 assets consist of ARS, whose underlying assets are primarily student loan securities supported by guarantees from the Federal Family Education Loan Program (“FFELP”) of the U.S. Department of Education.

The following tables summarize changes in fair value of the Company's Level 3 assets for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):

 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
 
Balance at beginning of period
 $29,114  $29,549  $29,189  $29,724 
Settlements
  (100)  (100)  (175)  (275)
Balance at end of period
 $29,014  $29,449  $29,014  $29,449 

The following table summarizes changes in fair value of the Company's Level 3 assets from December 31, 2007 to June 30, 2011 (in thousands):

   
Auction
Rate
Securities
 
Balance at December 31, 2007
 $53,975 
Change in unrealized loss included in other comprehensive loss
  (3,710)
Settlements
  (20,925)
Balance at December 31, 2008
  29,340 
Change in unrealized gain included in other comprehensive loss
  684 
Settlements
  (300)
Balance at December 31, 2009
  29,724 
Change in unrealized gain included in other comprehensive loss
  40 
Settlements
  (575)
Balance at December 31, 2010
  29,189 
Settlements
  (75)
Balance at March 31, 2011
  29,114 
Settlements
  (100)
Balance at June 30, 2011
 $29,014 

ARS are variable rate debt instruments whose interest rates are reset approximately every 28 days.  The underlying securities have contractual maturities greater than twenty years.  The ARS are recorded at fair value.

As of June 30, 2011, the Company held ARS with $32.0 million par value, all of which failed to settle at auction.  The majority of these investments are of high credit quality with AAA credit ratings and are primarily student loan securities supported by guarantees from the FFELP of the U.S. Department of Education.  The Company may not be able to liquidate and fully recover the carrying value of the ARS in the near term.  As a result, these securities are classified as long-term investments in the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2011.  

While the Company continues to earn interest on its ARS investments at the contractual rate, these investments are not currently trading and therefore do not currently have a readily determinable market value.  Accordingly, the estimated fair value of the ARS no longer approximates par value.  The Company used a discounted cash flow model to determine the estimated fair value of its investment in ARS as of June 30, 2011.  The assumptions used in preparing the discounted cash flow model include estimates for interest rates, credit spreads, timing and amount of cash flows, liquidity risk premiums, expected holding periods and default risk.  Based on this assessment of fair value, as of June 30, 2011, the Company determined there was a decline in the fair value of its ARS investments of approximately $3.0 million.  The decline was deemed to be a temporary impairment and recorded as an unrealized loss in accumulated other comprehensive loss in stockholders' equity.  In addition, while a majority of the ARS are currently rated AAA, if the issuers are unable to successfully close future auctions and/or their credit ratings deteriorate, the Company may be required to record additional unrealized losses in accumulated other comprehensive loss or an other-than-temporary impairment charge to earnings on these investments.
 
As of June 30, 2011, the Company's Level 3 liabilities consist of a $2.8 million liability for deferred consideration related to the October 19, 2009 acquisition of Resolve Technology, Inc. (“Resolve Technology”). The deferred consideration includes (i) a potential deferred cash payment due approximately two years after closing based on the incremental growth of Resolve Technology's revenue as of September 2011 over its revenue as of September 2009, and (ii) other potential deferred cash payments for successful completion of operational and sales milestones during the period from closing through no later than October 31, 2013, which period may be extended by the parties to a date no later than December 31, 2014.  In June 2011, the Company made a payment of $500,000 for the successful completion of one of the operational milestones.

The following tables summarize changes in fair value of the Company's Level 3 liabilities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):

   
Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
Six Months Ended
June 30,
   
2011
  
2010
  
2011
  2010
 
Balance at beginning of period
 $3,254  $3,120  $3,222  $3,082 
Accretion for period
  32   38   64   76 
Payments made during period
  (500)  ¾   (500)  ¾ 
Balance at end of period
 $2,786  $3,158  $2,786  $3,158 

The following table summarizes changes in fair value of the Company's Level 3 liabilities from December 31, 2009 to June 30, 2011 (in thousands):

   
Deferred Consideration
 
Balance at December 31, 2009
 $3,082 
Accretion for 2010
  140 
Balance at December 31, 2010
  3,222 
Accretion from January 1, 2011 – March 31, 2011
  32 
Balance at March 31, 2011
  3,254 
Accretion from April 1, 2011 – June 30, 2011
  32 
Payments from April 1, 2011 – June 30, 2011
  (500)
Balance at June 30, 2011
 $2,786 

The Company used a discounted cash flow model to determine the estimated fair value of its Level 3 liabilities as of June 30, 2011.  The significant assumptions used in preparing the discounted cash flow model include the discount rate, estimates for future incremental revenue growth and probabilities for completion of operational and sales milestones.
 
 
Concentration of Credit Risk and Financial Instruments

The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers' financial condition and generally does not require that its customers' obligations to the Company be secured. The Company maintains reserves for estimated inherent credit losses, and such losses have been within management's expectations. The large size and widespread nature of the Company's customer base and the Company's lack of dependence on individual customers mitigate the risk of nonpayment of the Company's accounts receivable. The carrying amount of the accounts receivable approximates the net realizable value. The carrying value of the Company's financial instruments including cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, long-term investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximates fair value.