XML 29 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2013
Fair Value Measurements  
Fair Value Measurements

6.             Fair Value Measurements

 

Fair value is the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  In determining fair value for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at fair value, we consider the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability.  We apply fair value measurements for both financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities.  We have no nonfinancial assets or liabilities that require measurement at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2013.

 

The fair value of our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, line of credit  and accrued expenses, approximate cost because of their short maturities.

 

We use the three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair values.  The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).  The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

 

·                  Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices available in active markets for the identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.

·                  Level 2 — Significant other observable inputs available at the measurement date, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, either directly or indirectly.

·                  Level 3 — Significant unobservable inputs that we cannot corroborate by observable market data and thus reflect the use of significant management judgment.  We generally determine these values using pricing models based on assumptions our management believes other market participants would make.

 

The fair value hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available.  In instances in which the inputs used to measure fair value fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy, we determine the fair value measurement based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.  Our assessment of the significance of a particular item to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, including the consideration of inputs specific to the asset or liability.  The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the accounting of our financial assets and/or liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 according to the valuation techniques we used to determine their fair value(s).

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements
(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)

 

Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)

 

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

 

At June 30, 2013:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

23,102

 

$

23,102

 

$

 

$

 

Total assets measured at fair value

 

$

23,102

 

$

23,102

 

$

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2012:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

10,315

 

$

10,315

 

$

 

$

 

Total assets measured at fair value

 

$

10,315

 

$

10,315

 

$

 

$