New Accounting Pronouncements

New Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted

ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for both operating leases and finance leases on the balance sheet at the lease commencement date. For operating leases, the lessee would recognize a straight-line total lease expense, while for finance leases, the lessee would recognize interest expense and amortization of the right-of-use asset. The Company currently only has operating leases. Lessor accounting remains largely unchanged, and the Company is not a lessor in any lease agreements. The guidance also requires certain qualitative and quantitative disclosures about the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases.

There have been multiple standard updates amending this guidance or providing corrections or improvements on issues in the guidance. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, “Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements,” which provides an optional transition method in addition to the existing modified retrospective transition method by allowing a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. Under this transition method, companies may continue to report comparative periods under ASC 840, although they must also provide the required disclosures under ASC 840 for all periods presented under ASC 840. In January 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-01, “Leases (Topic 842): Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842.” This update permits an entity to elect an optional transition practical expedient to not evaluate land easements that exist or expired before the entity’s adoption of ASU 2016-02 and that were not accounted for as leases under previous lease guidance.

The Company adopted this guidance as of the beginning of fiscal 2019, and as a part of that process, made the following elections:


•	The Company elected the optional transition method, which allows for the lessee to not recast comparative financial information but rather recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the effective date in the period of adoption.


•	The Company elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard, which, among other things, allowed the Company to carry forward its prior lease classification under ASC 840, not reassess whether expired or existing contracts contain leases and not reevaluate initial direct costs for existing leases.


•	The Company did not elect the hindsight practical expedient for all leases.


•	The Company elected to make the accounting policy election for short-term leases, for which the Company does not recognize right-of-use assets or lease liabilities, resulting in lease payments being recorded as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.


•	The majority of the Company’s leases have variable non-lease components. For leases where the non-lease components are fixed, the Company has elected an accounting policy to account for lease and non-lease components as a single component.


•	The Company elected the land easement practical expedient.

Adoption of the new standard had a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets, statement of shareholders’ equity and related disclosures, and resulted in the recording of additional right-of-use assets and lease liabilities of approximately $295.2 million as of the date of adoption. Right-of-use assets are recorded based upon the present value of remaining operating lease liabilities adjusted for prepaid and deferred rent, including deferred construction allowances from landlords and initial direct costs. The Company also recorded an adjustment to increase the opening balance of accumulated deficit by approximately $331,000 for the cumulative effect of the adoption of ASC 842 for right-of-use assets for stores with impairment indicators at adoption. The standard did not materially impact the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations or cash flows.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, “Intangibles–Goodwill and Other–Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is A Service Contract” (“ASU 2018-15”). This update clarifies the accounting treatment for fees paid by a customer in a cloud computing arrangement (hosting arrangement) by providing guidance for determining when the arrangement includes a software license. This guidance is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The amendments may be applied either retrospectively or prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption. The Company adopted this guidance as of the beginning of fiscal 2019 using the prospective adoption method. This guidance could have a material effect on future financial results depending on whether or not the Company implements new software as a service solutions with significant implementation costs, as they would be deferred and expensed over the term of the agreement. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s current consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

New Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement,” which amends the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements by removing, modifying and adding certain disclosures. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its future consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.