10-Q 1 a20140630-10q.htm 10-Q 2014.06.30-10Q

 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
__________________________________ 
Form 10-Q
__________________________________
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014
or
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from          to         
Commission file number: 000-23993
 __________________________________
Broadcom Corporation
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
__________________________________
California
33-0480482
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
5300 California Avenue
Irvine, California 92617-3038
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(949) 926-5000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
__________________________________ 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer  
 
x
 
Accelerated filer
 
¨
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-accelerated filer
 
¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Smaller reporting company  
 
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x
As of June 30, 2014 the registrant had 541 million shares of Class A common stock, $0.0001 par value, and 50 million shares of Class B common stock, $0.0001 par value, outstanding.
 



BROADCOM CORPORATION

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014

TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
 
 
Page
 
 



















Broadcom® and the pulse logo are among the trademarks of Broadcom Corporation and/or its affiliates in the United States, certain other countries and/or the EU. Any other trademarks or trade names mentioned are the property of their respective owners.

© 2014 Broadcom Corporation. All rights reserved.

1


PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.
Financial Statements

BROADCOM CORPORATION

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 
 
June 30,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
 
(In millions)
ASSETS
Current assets:
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
2,364

 
$
1,657

Short-term marketable securities
769

 
775

Accounts receivable, net
796

 
795

Inventory
614

 
525

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
159

 
163

Total current assets
4,702

 
3,915

Property and equipment, net
540

 
593

Long-term marketable securities
1,892

 
1,939

Goodwill
3,769

 
3,793

Purchased intangible assets, net
972

 
1,144

Other assets
96

 
111

Total assets
$
11,971

 
$
11,495

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
 
 
 
Accounts payable
$
682

 
$
585

Wages and related benefits
215

 
243

Deferred revenue and income
39

 
21

Accrued liabilities
662

 
647

Total current liabilities
1,598

 
1,496

Long-term debt
1,395

 
1,394

Other long-term liabilities
305

 
234

Commitments and contingencies


 


Shareholders’ equity:
 
 
 
Common stock

 

Additional paid-in capital
12,599

 
12,475

Accumulated deficit
(3,943
)
 
(4,107
)
Accumulated other comprehensive income
17

 
3

Total shareholders’ equity
8,673

 
8,371

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
$
11,971

 
$
11,495




See accompanying notes.
2


BROADCOM CORPORATION

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In millions, except per share data)
Net revenue:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Product revenue
$
2,041

 
$
2,047

 
$
4,025

 
$
4,009

Income from Qualcomm Agreement

 
43

 

 
86

Total net revenue
2,041

 
2,090

 
4,025

 
4,095

Costs and expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cost of product revenue
1,005

 
1,030

 
2,009

 
2,018

Research and development
634

 
619

 
1,270

 
1,234

Selling, general and administrative
182

 
174

 
367

 
353

Amortization of purchased intangible assets
9

 
14

 
18

 
29

Impairments of long-lived assets
165

 
501

 
190

 
511

Restructuring costs, net
23

 

 
28

 

Settlement costs
16

 

 
18

 

Other gains, net
(7
)
 

 
(59
)
 

Total operating costs and expenses
2,027

 
2,338

 
3,841

 
4,145

Income (loss) from operations
14

 
(248
)
 
184

 
(50
)
Interest expense, net
(5
)
 
(9
)
 
(10
)
 
(17
)
Other income (expense), net
(8
)
 
3

 
(5
)
 
6

Income (loss) before income taxes
1

 
(254
)
 
169

 
(61
)
Provision for (benefit of) income taxes
2

 
(3
)
 
5

 
(1
)
Net income (loss)
$
(1
)
 
$
(251
)
 
$
164

 
$
(60
)
Net income (loss) per share (basic)
$

 
$
(0.43
)
 
$
0.28

 
$
(0.10
)
Net income (loss) per share (diluted)
$

 
$
(0.43
)
 
$
0.28

 
$
(0.10
)
Weighted average shares (basic)
587

 
578

 
585

 
574

Weighted average shares (diluted)
587

 
578

 
593

 
574

Dividends per share
$
0.12

 
$
0.11

 
$
0.24

 
$
0.22


The following table presents details of total stock-based compensation expense included in each functional line item in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income above: 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In millions)
Cost of product revenue
$
5

 
$
6

 
$
11

 
$
13

Research and development
80

 
95

 
164

 
194

Selling, general and administrative
28

 
35

 
58

 
69



See accompanying notes.
3


BROADCOM CORPORATION

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In millions)
Net income (loss)
$
(1
)
 
$
(251
)
 
$
164

 
$
(60
)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of $0 tax in 2014 and 2013
14

 
(1
)
 
13

 
1

Unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities, net of $0 tax in 2014 and 2013

 
(6
)
 
1

 
(5
)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
14

 
(7
)
 
14

 
(4
)
Comprehensive income (loss)
$
13

 
$
(258
)
 
$
178

 
$
(64
)


See accompanying notes.
4


BROADCOM CORPORATION

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In millions)
Operating activities
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
$
164

 
$
(60
)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
99

 
78

Stock-based compensation expense
233

 
276

Acquisition-related items:
 
 
 
Amortization of purchased intangible assets
115

 
116

Impairments of long-lived assets
190

 
511

Gain on sale of assets and other
(47
)
 
(1
)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
 
 
 
Accounts receivable, net
(1
)
 
(21
)
Inventory
(90
)
 
(83
)
Prepaid expenses and other assets
(4
)
 
(27
)
Accounts payable
97

 
92

Deferred revenue
105

 
(9
)
Other accrued and long-term liabilities
(30
)
 
(150
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
831

 
722

Investing activities
 
 
 
Net purchases of property and equipment
(158
)
 
(108
)
Net cash paid for acquired companies
(6
)
 

Proceeds from sale of certain assets and other
90

 

Purchases of marketable securities
(913
)
 
(1,536
)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities
970

 
1,105

Net cash used in investing activities
(17
)
 
(539
)
Financing activities
 
 
 
Repurchases of Class A common stock
(191
)
 
(217
)
Dividends paid
(140
)
 
(127
)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
283

 
267

Minimum tax withholding paid on behalf of employees for restricted stock units
(59
)
 
(78
)
Net cash used in financing activities
(107
)
 
(155
)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
707

 
28

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
1,657

 
1,617

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
2,364

 
$
1,645



See accompanying notes.
5


BROADCOM CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Our Company

Broadcom Corporation (including our subsidiaries, referred to collectively in this Report as “Broadcom,” “we,” “our” and “us”) is a global leader and innovator in semiconductor solutions for wired and wireless communications. Broadcom® products seamlessly deliver voice, video, data and multimedia connectivity in the home, office and mobile environments. We provide the industry’s broadest portfolio of state-of-the-art system-on-a-chip solutions, or SoCs.

Basis of Presentation

The interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, for interim financial information and with the instructions to Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, Form 10-Q and Article 10 of SEC Regulation S-X. They do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. Therefore, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2013, included in our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on January 30, 2014, referred to as our 2013 Annual Report.

The interim condensed consolidated financial statements included herein are unaudited; however, they contain all normal recurring accruals and adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly our results of operations and financial position for the interim periods. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for future quarters or the full year. Additionally, certain amounts previously reported as licensing revenue have been reclassified to product revenue to conform to the current period presentation. Such reclassifications had an impact of $12 million and $20 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, but did not affect total net revenue, net income, shareholders' equity or cash flows.

For a complete summary of our significant accounting policies, please refer to Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in Part IV, Item 15 of our 2013 Annual Report. There have been no material changes to our significant accounting policies during the six months ended June 30, 2014.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of total net revenue and expenses in the reporting periods. We regularly evaluate estimates and assumptions related to revenue recognition, rebates, allowances for doubtful accounts, sales returns and allowances, warranty obligations, inventory valuation, stock-based compensation expense, long-lived asset valuations, strategic investments, deferred income tax asset valuation allowances, uncertain tax positions, tax contingencies, self-insurance, restructuring costs or reversals, litigation and other loss contingencies. These estimates and assumptions are based on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the recording of revenue, costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results we experience may differ materially and adversely from our estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and actual results, our future results of operations will be affected.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accountings Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, or ASU 2014-09, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The standard will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. The new standard is effective for us on January 1, 2017. Early application is not permitted. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. We are evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. We have not yet selected a transition method nor have we determined the effect of the standard on our ongoing financial reporting.

6



2.
Supplemental Financial Information

The following tables present details of our condensed consolidated financial statements:

Inventory
 
June 30,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
 
(In millions)
Work in process
$
267

 
$
202

Finished goods
347

 
323

 
$
614

 
$
525


Accrued Liabilities
 
June 30,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
 
(In millions)
Accrued rebates
$
431

 
$
409

Accrued royalties
20

 
15

Accrued settlement charges
42

 
66

Accrued legal costs
10

 
15

Accrued taxes
14

 
20

Warranty reserve
16

 
19

Restructuring liabilities
26

 
17

Other
103

 
86

 
$
662

 
$
647


Other Long-Term Liabilities
 
June 30,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
 
(In millions)
Deferred rent
$
43

 
$
46

Accrued taxes
72

 
72

Deferred tax liabilities
28

 
35

Accrued settlement charges
21

 
25

Deferred revenue
120

 
33

Other long-term liabilities
21

 
23

 
$
305

 
$
234


7



Accrued Rebate Activity

The following table summarizes activity related to accrued rebates:
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In millions)
Beginning balance
$
409

 
$
383

Charged as a reduction of revenue
363

 
353

Reversal of unclaimed rebates
(19
)
 
(13
)
Payments
(322
)
 
(390
)
Ending balance
$
431

 
$
333


We recorded customer rebates of $176 million and $192 million in the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Income from the Qualcomm Agreement

For a discussion of income from our April 2009 agreement with Qualcomm Incorporated, or the Qualcomm Agreement,
please refer to Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in Part IV, Item 15 of our 2013 Annual Report. The
income from the Qualcomm Agreement terminated in April 2013.

Other Gains, Net

In March 2014 we sold certain Ethernet controller-related assets and provided non-exclusive licenses to intellectual property, including a non-exclusive patent license, to QLogic Corporation for a total of $209 million, referred to as the QLogic Transaction. The transaction was accounted for as a multiple element arrangement, which primarily included (i) the sale of certain assets (constituting a business for accounting purposes), (ii) the licensing of certain intellectual property and (iii) a long-term supply agreement. In connection with the transaction, we recorded a gain on the sale of assets of $48 million (net of a goodwill adjustment of $37 million) and deferred revenue of $120 million. The revenue related to the license agreement ($76 million) and the supply agreement ($44 million) will be amortized over approximately seven years. The operating gain was recorded in "Other gains, net" included in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2014.

In determining the fair value of the license agreement we used the relief from royalty income approach, as well as a market approach utilizing another transaction that we had previously entered into for the same intellectual property, adjusted for changes in the market and other assumptions since that transaction.  The supply agreement was valued utilizing the cost savings income approach. The relief from royalty income and cost saving income approaches employ significant unobservable inputs categorized as Level 3 inputs. The key unobservable inputs utilized include discount rates of approximately 13% to 15%, a market participant tax rate of 17%, and estimated level of future volumes and pricing based on current product and market data.

The adjustment to goodwill due to the QLogic Transaction was calculated by determining the value of the business sold in relation to the value of the Infrastructure and Networking reportable segment.  The value of the business sold was determined utilizing the residual method. 

Computation of Net Income (Loss) Per Share

Net income (loss) per share (basic) is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Net income (loss) per share (diluted) is calculated by adjusting outstanding shares, assuming any dilutive effects of stock options, stock purchase rights and restricted stock units calculated using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, an increase in the fair market value of our Class A common stock results in a greater dilutive effect from outstanding stock options, stock purchase rights and restricted stock units. Additionally, the exercise of employee stock options and stock purchase rights and the vesting of restricted stock units results in a further dilutive effect on net income per share.

8



The following table presents the computation of net income (loss) per share: 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In millions, except per share data)
Numerator: Net income (loss)
$
(1
)
 
$
(251
)
 
$
164

 
$
(60
)
Denominator for net income (loss) per share (basic)
587

 
578

 
585

 
574

Effect of dilutive securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stock awards

 

 
8

 

Denominator for net income (loss) per share (diluted)
587

 
578

 
593

 
574

Net income (loss) per share (basic)
$

 
$
(0.43
)
 
$
0.28

 
$
(0.10
)
Net income (loss) per share (diluted)
$

 
$
(0.43
)
 
$
0.28

 
$
(0.10
)

Net income (loss) per share (diluted) does not include the effect of anti-dilutive potential common shares resulting from outstanding equity awards. There were 32 million and 34 million anti-dilutive potential common shares in the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively and 31 million and 35 million anti-dilutive potential common shares in the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

In the six months ended June 30, 2014, we paid $29 million for capital equipment that was accrued as of December 31, 2013 and had billings of $26 million for capital equipment that were accrued but not yet paid as of June 30, 2014.

3.
Fair Value Measurements

Our financial instruments consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, short- and long-term marketable securities, accounts receivable, accounts payable and long-term debt. The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that would be received in an asset sale or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between unaffiliated market participants. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are categorized based on whether or not the inputs are observable in the market and the degree that the inputs are observable. The categorization of financial instruments within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The hierarchy is prioritized into three levels (with Level 3 being the lowest) defined as follows:

Level 1: Inputs are based on quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets at the measurement date.
Level 2:Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and/or quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active near the measurement date.
Level 3:Inputs include management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. The inputs are unobservable in the market and significant to the instrument’s valuation.

The fair value of the majority of our cash equivalents and marketable securities was determined based on “Level 1” inputs. The fair value of certain marketable securities and our long-term debt were determined based on “Level 2” inputs. The valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of our “Level 2” instruments were valued based on quoted market prices or model driven valuations using significant inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data. We do not have any marketable securities in the “Level 3” category. We believe that the recorded values of all our other financial instruments approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective relatively short maturity dates or durations.

9



Instruments Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis. The following tables present our cash and marketable securities’ costs, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and fair value by major security type recorded as cash and cash equivalents or short-term or long-term marketable securities: 
 
June 30, 2014
 
Cost
 
Gross Unrealized Gains
 
Gross Unrealized Losses
 
Fair Value
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
Short-Term Marketable Securities
 
Long-Term Marketable Securities
 
(In millions)
Cash
$
609

 
$

 
$

 
$
609

 
$
609

 
$

 
$

Level 1:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bank and time deposits
1,118

 

 

 
1,118

 
1,118

 

 

Money market funds
210

 

 

 
210

 
210

 

 

U.S. treasury and agency obligations
1,041

 

 

 
1,041

 
5

 
214

 
822

Subtotal
2,369

 

 

 
2,369

 
1,333

 
214

 
822

Level 2:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial paper
474

 

 

 
474

 
422

 
52

 

Corporate bonds
1,534

 
4

 

 
1,538

 

 
500

 
1,038

Asset-backed securities and other
35

 

 

 
35

 

 
3

 
32

Subtotal
2,043

 
4

 

 
2,047

 
422

 
555

 
1,070

Level 3:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
None

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total
$
5,021

 
$
4

 
$

 
$
5,025

 
$
2,364

 
$
769

 
$
1,892


 
December 31, 2013
 
Cost
 
Gross Unrealized Gains
 
Gross Unrealized Losses
 
Fair Value
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
Short-Term Marketable Securities
 
Long-Term Marketable Securities
 
(In millions)
Cash
$
307

 
$

 
$

 
$
307

 
$
307

 
$

 
$

Level 1:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bank and time deposits
474

 

 

 
474

 
474

 

 

Money market funds
277

 

 

 
277

 
277

 

 

U.S. treasury and agency obligations
1,005

 
1

 

 
1,006

 

 
205

 
801

Subtotal
1,756

 
1

 

 
1,757

 
751

 
205

 
801

Level 2:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial paper
690

 

 

 
690

 
599

 
91

 

Corporate bonds
1,591

 
3

 
(1
)
 
1,593

 

 
477

 
1,116

Asset-backed securities and other
24

 

 

 
24

 

 
2

 
22

Subtotal
2,305

 
3

 
(1
)
 
2,307

 
599

 
570

 
1,138

Level 3:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
None

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total
$
4,368

 
$
4

 
$
(1
)
 
$
4,371

 
$
1,657

 
$
775

 
$
1,939


There were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 securities in the six months ended June 30, 2014. All of our long-term marketable securities had maturities of between one and three years in duration at June 30, 2014. Our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at June 30, 2014 consisted of $2.11 billion held domestically, with the remaining balance of $2.92 billion held by our foreign subsidiaries.

10



At June 30, 2014 we had 63 investments with a fair value of $504 million that were in an unrealized loss position for less than twelve months. Our gross unrealized losses of less than $1 million for these investments at June 30, 2014 were due to changes in market rates. We have determined that the gross unrealized losses on these investments at June 30, 2014 are temporary in nature. We evaluate securities for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis. Impairment is evaluated considering numerous factors, and their relative significance varies depending on the situation. Factors considered include the length of time and extent to which fair value has been less than the cost basis, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and our intent and ability to hold the investment in order to allow for an anticipated recovery in fair value.

Instruments Not Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis. We measure the fair value of our long-term debt carried at amortized cost quarterly for disclosure purposes. The estimated fair value of long-term debt is determined by Level 2 inputs and is based primarily on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues. Based on the market prices, the fair value of our long-term debt was $1.39 billion and $1.37 billion as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The recorded values of all our accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective relatively short maturity dates or durations.

Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis. We measure the fair value of our cost method investments when they are deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business acquisition, goodwill and other long lived assets when they are held for sale or determined to be impaired, and for license and settlement agreements when they are part of a multiple element arrangement. See Notes 2, 9 and 10 for discussion on fair value measurements of certain assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis.

4.
Income Taxes

The following table presents details of the provision for (benefit of) income taxes and our effective tax rates:
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In millions, except percentages)
Provision for (benefit of) income taxes
$
2

 
$
(3
)
 
5

 
(1
)
Effective tax rates
200.0
%
 
1.2
%
 
3.0
%
 
1.6
%

The differences between our effective tax rates and the 35% federal statutory rate resulted primarily from foreign earnings taxed at substantially lower rates than the federal statutory rate and domestic tax losses recorded without tax benefits. In determining our annualized effective tax rates, the tax effects of the impairments of long-lived assets of $165 million and $501 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, $23 million of restructuring costs for the three months ended June 30, 2014, $48 million gain on sale of assets for the six months ended June 30, 2014, and the impairments of long-lived assets of $190 million and $511 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, were treated as discrete items. As a result, we recorded discrete tax benefits for the impairments of long-lived assets of $8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, and $5 million and $10 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. We also recorded discrete tax benefits of $5 million and $4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $9 million and $6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, resulting primarily from the expiration of statutes of limitations for the assessment of taxes in various foreign jurisdictions.

As a result of our cumulative tax losses in the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions, and the full utilization of our loss carryback opportunities, we have concluded that a full valuation allowance should be recorded in such jurisdictions. In certain other foreign jurisdictions where we do not have cumulative losses, we had net deferred tax liabilities of $17 million and $24 million at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

Our income tax returns for the 2007, 2008 and 2009 tax years are currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service.  We do not believe the audit will have a material impact on our financial position, operating results, or cash flows.  However, our deferred tax assets could be reduced, with a corresponding reduction in the valuation allowance related to such deferred tax assets.


11


5.
Debt and Credit Facility

Senior Notes

The following table presents details of our senior notes, or the Notes: 
 
June 30,
2014
 
(In millions)
2.375% fixed-rate notes, due November 2015
$
400

2.700% fixed-rate notes, due November 2018
500

2.500% fixed-rate notes, due August 2022
500

 
$
1,400

Unaccreted discount
(5
)
 
$
1,395


The outstanding Notes contain a number of customary representations, warranties and restrictive covenants, including, but not limited to, restrictions on our ability to grant liens on assets; enter into sale and lease-back transactions; or merge, consolidate or sell assets. Failure to comply with these covenants, or any other event of default, could result in acceleration of the principal amount and accrued but unpaid interest on the Notes.

Relative to our overall indebtedness, the outstanding Notes rank in right of payment (i) equal with all of our other existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness (ii) senior to all of our existing and future subordinated indebtedness, and (iii) effectively subordinated to all of our subsidiaries' existing and future indebtedness and other obligations (including secured and unsecured obligations) and subordinated to our existing and future secured indebtedness and other obligations, to the extent of the assets securing such indebtedness and other obligations.

Credit Facility

In November 2010 we entered into a credit facility with certain institutional lenders that provides for unsecured revolving facility loans, swing line loans and letters of credit in an aggregate amount of up to $500 million. We amended this credit facility in October 2011 primarily to extend the maturity date by two years to November 19, 2016, at which time all outstanding revolving facility loans (if any) and accrued and unpaid interest must be repaid. The amendment to the credit facility also decreased the interest rate margins applicable to loans made under the credit facility and the commitment fee paid on the amount of the unused commitments. We have not drawn on our credit facility to date.

The credit facility contains customary representations, warranties and covenants. Financial covenants require us to maintain a consolidated leverage ratio of no more than 3.25 to 1.00 and a consolidated interest coverage ratio of no less than 3.00 to 1.00.

6.
Shareholders’ Equity

Quarterly Dividend

In January 2014 our Board of Directors adopted an amendment to the existing dividend policy pursuant to which we increased the quarterly cash dividend by 9% to $0.12 per share ($0.48 per share on an annual basis) payable to holders of our common stock. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 we paid $70 million, $64 million, $140 million and $127 million, respectively, in dividends to holders of our Class A and Class B common stock.

Share Repurchase Programs

In February 2010 we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized an "evergreen" share repurchase program intended to offset dilution of incremental grants of stock awards associated with our stock incentive plans. The maximum number of shares of our Class A common stock that may be repurchased in any one year under this program (including under an accelerated share repurchase agreement or similar arrangement) is equal to the total number of shares issued pursuant to our equity awards in the previous year and the current year. This program does not have an expiration date and may be suspended at any time at the discretion of the Board of Directors. It may also be complemented with one or more additional share

12


repurchase programs in the future. Under the evergreen program, we repurchased 6.2 million shares of our Class A common stock at a weighted average price of $30.79 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

Repurchases under our share repurchase programs were and are intended to be made in open market or privately negotiated transactions in compliance with Rule 10b-18 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Our share repurchase programs do not obligate us to acquire any particular amount of our stock and may be suspended at any time at our discretion.

7.
Employee Benefit Plans

Combined Incentive Plan Activity

Restricted stock unit activity is set forth below:
 
Restricted Stock Units
Outstanding
 
Number of
Shares
 
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
per Share
 
(In millions, except per share data)
Balance at December 31, 2013
24

 
$
34.91

Restricted stock units granted
13

 
29.90

Restricted stock units cancelled
(1
)
 
33.65

Restricted stock units vested
(6
)
 
35.19

Balance at June 30, 2014
30

 
$
32.64


Stock option activity is set forth below: 
 
Options Outstanding
 
Number of
Shares
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
per Share
 
(In millions, except per share data)
Balance at December 31, 2013
39

 
$
30.39

Options cancelled
(1
)
 
36.87

Options exercised
(8
)
 
24.12

Balance at June 30, 2014
30

 
$
31.95


The following table presents details of unearned stock-based compensation currently estimated to be expensed in the remainder of 2014 through 2018 related to unvested share-based payment awards: 
 
2014
 
2015
 
2016
 
2017
 
2018
 
Total
 
(In millions)
Unearned stock-based compensation
$
227

 
$
335

 
$
216

 
$
110

 
$
17

 
$
905


If there are any modifications or cancellations of the underlying unvested awards, including the cancellation of awards held by employees impacted by our current restructuring plan, we may be required to accelerate, increase or cancel any remaining unearned stock-based compensation expense. Future stock-based compensation expense and unearned stock-based compensation will increase to the extent that we grant additional equity awards or assume unvested equity awards in connection with acquisitions.



13


8.
Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

We and certain of our subsidiaries are currently parties to various legal proceedings, including those noted in this section. Unless otherwise noted below, during the periods presented we have not: recorded any accrual for loss contingencies associated with such legal proceedings; determined that an unfavorable outcome is probable or reasonably possible; or determined that the amount or range of any possible loss is reasonably estimable. We are engaged in numerous other legal actions not described below arising in the ordinary course of our business and, while there can be no assurance, we believe that the ultimate outcome of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on our operating results, liquidity or financial position.

From time to time we may conclude it is in the best interests of our shareholders, employees, and customers to settle one or more litigation matters, and any such settlement could include substantial payments; however, other than as noted below, we have not reached this conclusion with respect to any particular matter at this time. There are a variety of factors that influence our decisions to settle and the amount we may choose to pay, including the strength of our case, developments in the litigation, the behavior of other interested parties, the demand on management time and the possible distraction of our employees associated with the case and/or the possibility that we may be subject to an injunction or other equitable remedy. It is difficult to predict whether a settlement is possible, the amount of an appropriate settlement or when is the opportune time to settle a matter in light of the numerous factors that go into the settlement decision.

Intellectual Property Proceedings

In March 2013 NXP B.V. sued Nintendo, our customer, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, asserting five patents against the Wii U, a Nintendo product.  In October 2013 NXP B.V. withdrew its complaint against Nintendo and filed a new complaint against us, Case No. 2-13-cv-01883 (D. Nev.), asserting the same five patents against our near field communications (NFC) products.  This case was later transferred to the Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.). In May 2013 we sued NXP Semiconductors USA, Inc. for patent infringement in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Case No. SACV13-829-MRP-MAN (C.D. Cal.).  The complaint accuses the NXP entities of infringing five of our patents and identifies certain NXP NFC and Secure Element products as representative accused products.  In June 2014 the parties entered into a settlement agreement that includes a mutual release, a limited standstill period, ongoing business collaboration, and, if certain conditions are met, a future cross-license covering NFC products. In July 2014, as provided for in the agreement, the parties moved to dismiss the N.D. Cal. and C.D. Cal. litigations without prejudice.

We and our subsidiaries are also involved in other intellectual property proceedings, claims and litigation. We will disclose the nature of any such matter if we believe it to be material. Particularly in the early stages of such proceedings, an assessment of materiality may be complicated by limited information, including, without limitation, limited information about the patents-in-suit and Broadcom products against which the patents are being asserted. Accordingly, our assessment of materiality may change in the future based upon availability of discovery and further developments in the proceedings at issue. Some of these intellectual property proceedings may involve, for example, “non-practicing entities” asserting claims addressing certain of our products. The resolution of intellectual property litigation can include, among other things, payment of damages, royalties, or other amounts, which could adversely impact our product gross margins in future periods, or could prevent us from manufacturing or selling some of our products or limit or restrict the type of work that employees may perform for us. In addition, from time to time we are approached by holders of intellectual property, including non-practicing entities, to engage in discussions about our obtaining licenses to their intellectual property. We will disclose the nature of any such discussion if we determine that (i) it is probable an intellectual property holder will assert a claim of infringement, (ii) there is a reasonable possibility the outcome (assuming assertion) will be unfavorable, and (iii) the resulting liability would be material to our financial condition or results of operations.

Other Proceedings

In September 2013 the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, a Chinese regulatory agency, commenced an informal review of our compliance with China’s antitrust laws. We fully cooperated with this review and made our last submission of information to the SAIC in October 2013.

General

We and our subsidiaries are also involved in other legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. We will disclose the nature of any such matter if we believe it to be material.


14


The pending proceedings described above involve complex questions of fact and law and may require the expenditure of significant funds and the diversion of other resources to prosecute and defend. The results of legal proceedings are inherently uncertain, and material adverse outcomes are possible. From time to time we may enter into confidential discussions regarding the potential settlement of pending intellectual property or other litigation or other proceedings; however, there can be no assurance that any such discussions will occur or will result in a settlement. In the course of such settlement discussions, if we conclude that a settlement loss is probable and the settlement amount is estimable we may record settlement costs, notwithstanding not having reached a final settlement agreement. The settlement of any pending litigation or other proceedings could require us to incur substantial settlement payments and costs. Furthermore, the settlement of any intellectual property proceeding may require us to grant a license to certain of our intellectual property rights to the other party under a cross-license agreement. If any of those events were to occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Settlement Costs

We recorded settlement costs of $16 million and $18 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, related to the settlement of patent infringement claims. We did not record any settlement costs in the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.

9.
Exit of Cellular Baseband Business

Restructuring Costs

On June 2, 2014, we announced that we were exploring strategic alternatives, including a potential sale and/or wind-down, for our cellular baseband business, included in our Mobile and Wireless reportable segment. We reached this decision based on our conclusion that the commercial and economic opportunity in this business was not sufficiently compelling to justify the continued investment, especially when compared to other opportunities within our product portfolio. On June 26, 2014, the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors approved a global restructuring plan, or the 2014 Plan, that focuses on cost reductions and operating efficiencies and better aligns our resources to areas of strategic focus.

We have evaluated the number of employees and other resources necessary to support the ongoing business and recorded $23 million in restructuring charges in the three months ended June 30, 2014. These charges are comprised of (i) $18 million for ongoing termination benefits for approximately 250 employees related to selling, general and administrative and other corporate functions and (ii) $5 million for certain non-cancelable contract costs. Communications to the impacted employees began in July 2014. We expect to record additional costs of approximately $5 million over the next twelve months for one-time termination benefits for these employees.

As of June 30, 2014 we had not made a determination as to whether we would exit the cellular baseband business through a sale or wind-down.  Therefore, the restructuring plan relating to cellular baseband employees (who are primarily engaged in research and development) was subject to significant change and uncertainty since it was dependent upon the outcome of our effort to sell the business. In July 2014 we determined to pursue a wind-down of the cellular baseband business. As a result, we currently expect to (i) reduce our worldwide headcount by approximately an additional 2,250 employees, (ii) close or consolidate up to 18 locations and (iii) terminate certain contracts, which is expected to result in approximately $225 million of additional restructuring charges over the next twelve months.  Communications to these impacted employees also began in July 2014. These restructuring charges are considered a non-recognizable subsequent event for financial reporting purposes for the three months ended June 30, 2014.

Restructuring costs are primarily comprised of cash-based termination benefits and contract costs to be incurred without economic benefit. Due to various complexities in our international locations, some employee terminations may not be in effect for some time. We anticipate most of the expenses associated with this plan will be recognized within the next twelve months.


15


The following table summarizes activity related to our restructuring liabilities:
 
2014 Plan
 
2013 Plan
 
Total
 
(In millions)
Balance at December 31, 2013
$

 
$
17

 
17

Charged to expense
23

 
5

 
28

Cash payments

 
(19
)
 
(19
)
Balance at June 30, 2014
$
23

 
$
3

 
$
26


As described in our 2013 Annual Report, we implemented a restructuring plan in the third quarter of 2013. The plan focused primarily on workforce reductions and included employees from our transaction with Renesas Electronics Corporation. 

Impairment Charges

In connection with our decision to exit the cellular baseband business, which is included in our Mobile and Wireless reportable segment, we recorded $130 million of non-cash charges for the impairment of certain long-lived assets and $34 million of inventory charges in the three months ending June 30, 2014. We wrote down the value of property and equipment related to the cellular baseband business by $104 million to reflect the fair value of these assets on an in-exchange basis. In determining the fair value of the assets, we used a market based approach to estimate the value we could receive in the open market, and subtracted the cost to sell those assets. We also performed a detailed analysis of our electronic design automation, or EDA, tools and technology licenses that relate to our cellular baseband business. Because the majority of these EDA tools and technology licenses are not transferable and will have no useful applications for our remaining operations, we recorded an impairment charge of $19 million related to these licenses. We also recorded impairment charges of purchased intangible assets of $2 million and other assets of $5 million. The impairment charges were recorded in "Impairment of Long-Lived Assets" and the inventory charge were recorded in "Cost of Product Revenue" included in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

10.
Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets

Goodwill

The following table summarizes the activity related to the carrying value of our goodwill: 
 
Reportable Segments
 
 
 
 
 
Broadband
Communications
 
Mobile and
Wireless
 
Infrastructure
and Networking
 
Foreign
Currency
 
Consolidated
 
(In millions)
Goodwill
$
770

 
$
1,053

 
$
3,778

 
$
21

 
$
5,622

Accumulated impairment losses

 
(543
)
 
(1,286
)
 

 
(1,829
)
Goodwill at December 31, 2013
$
770

 
$
510

 
$
2,492

 
$
21

 
$
3,793

Goodwill recorded in connection with acquisitions

 
5

 

 

 
5

Adjustment due to sale of certain assets (Note 2)

 

 
(37
)
 

 
(37
)
Effects of foreign currency translation

 

 

 
8

 
8

Goodwill at June 30, 2014
$
770

 
$
515

 
$
2,455

 
$
29

 
$
3,769


Purchased Intangible Assets

The following table presents details of our purchased intangible assets: 

16


 
June 30, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
 
Gross
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Net
 
Gross
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Net
 
(In millions)
Developed technology
$
1,495

 
$
(618
)
 
$
877

 
$
1,492

 
$
(539
)
 
$
953

In-process research and development
52

 

 
52

 
130

 

 
130

Customer relationships
233

 
(192
)
 
41

 
232

 
(176
)
 
56

Other
32

 
(30
)
 
2

 
34

 
(29
)
 
5

 
$
1,812

 
$
(840
)
 
$
972

 
$
1,888

 
$
(744
)
 
$
1,144


In the six months ended June 30, 2014 we reclassified $78 million of in-process research and development, or
IPR&D costs, to developed technology primarily related to knowledge-based processors from our acquisition of NetLogic Microsystems, Inc., or NetLogic.

Impairment of Purchased Intangible Assets

In the three months ended March 31, 2014 we recorded impairment charges primarily for developed technology of $25 million, of which $19 million was related to our acquisition of SC Square Ltd., or SC Square, and $5 million related to the purchase of LTE-related assets from affiliates of Renesas Electronics Corporation, or the Renesas Transaction, each included in our Mobile and Wireless reportable segment. The primary factors contributing to these impairment charges were (i) for SC Square, the discontinuation of certain security solutions and (ii) for the Renesas Transaction, a reduction in revenue expectations related to an acquired legacy LTE modem product and an associated decrease to the respective estimated cash flows. 

In the three months ended June 30, 2014, we recorded impairment charges of $35 million, primarily for developed technology related to our acquisition of NetLogic, included in our Infrastructure and Networking reportable segment. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we have seen a reduction in customer design activity for MIPS-based embedded processors compared to our previous forecast primarily due to customers increasingly selecting ARM-based solutions for next generation core network architectures. This reduction in design activity resulted in a reduction in revenue and estimated cash flows related to our legacy embedded processor products compared to our previous forecasts. 

In the three months ended June 30, 2013 we recorded impairment charges of $501 million, of which $461 million also related to our acquisition of NetLogic. The remaining $40 million of the impairment is primarily related to our acquisition of Provigent, Inc. Both of these acquisitions are included in our Infrastructure and Networking reportable segment. Based on our impairment analysis, as further detailed below, we impaired $358 million of completed technology, $91 million of IPR&D, $50 million of customer relationships, and $2 million of other purchased intangible assets.

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, there was a steady reduction in near-term sales forecasts for NetLogic products sold into the service provider market, which caused us to review our long-term forecasts. In addition, we downwardly revised our longer term expectations of the size of the addressable market for these products. As a result of these triggering events, we performed a detailed impairment analysis of the long-lived assets associated with these products during the three months ended June 30, 2013. Based on our analysis, we determined certain assets acquired from NetLogic were not recoverable and impaired, requiring us to reduce the associated carrying value to fair value. Specifically, we impaired $238 million of developed technology, $88 million of IPR&D and $48 million of customer relationships related to our embedded and knowledge-based processor products. We also impaired $87 million of developed technology related to our DFE processor products. For DFE, one of our smaller product lines, our customers indicated that they prefer custom solutions as opposed to standard merchant solutions. In response, we have decided to redirect our efforts by focusing on developing customized solutions, and have consequently fully impaired the assets related to the acquired DFE merchant product line.

The primary factor contributing to the Provigent impairment for developed technology in the three months ended June 30, 2013 and the charge taken in the three months ended March 31, 2013, primarily for IPR&D of $10 million, was the continued reduction in revenue outlook for certain products and the resulting decrease to the estimated cash flows identified with impaired assets.


17


Valuation Information

In determining the amount of the impairment charges we calculated fair values as of the impairment dates for acquired intangible assets. We used several variations of the income approach to compute the fair values, including the multiple period excess earnings, relief from royalty, and incremental cash flow methods. These methods employ significant unobservable inputs categorized as Level 3 inputs. The key unobservable inputs utilized include discount rates ranging from 16% and 22%, a market participant tax rate of 17%, and estimated level of future cash flows based on current product and market data.

Amortization of Purchased Intangible Assets

The following table presents details of the amortization of purchased intangible assets included in the cost of product revenue and other operating expense categories:
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In millions)
Cost of product revenue
$
47

 
$
44

 
$
97

 
$
87

Other operating expenses
9

 
14

 
18

 
29

 
$
56

 
$
58

 
$
115

 
$
116


The following table presents details of the amortization of existing purchased intangible assets (including IPR&D), which is currently estimated to be expensed in the remainder of 2014 and thereafter: 
 
Purchased Intangible Asset Amortization by Year
 
2014
 
2015
 
2016
 
2017
 
2018
 
Thereafter
 
Total
 
(In millions)
Cost of product revenue
$
92

 
$
170

 
$
147

 
$
127

 
$
108

 
$
285

 
$
929

Other operating expenses
17

 
13

 
6

 
3

 
2

 
2

 
43

 
$
109

 
$
183

 
$
153

 
$
130

 
$
110

 
$
287

 
$
972


11.
Reportable Segments, Significant Customer and Geographical Information

Reportable Segments

Broadcom has three reportable segments consistent with our target markets. Our three reportable segments are: Broadband Communications (Home), Mobile and Wireless (Hand), and Infrastructure and Networking (Infrastructure). Our Chief Executive Officer, who is our chief operating decision maker, or CODM, regularly reviews financial information at the reportable segment level.

Our net revenue is generated principally from sales of integrated circuit products. While we derive some revenue from other sources, that revenue is not material as it represents less than 1% of our total net revenue. Such revenue is classified under product revenue for reporting purposes. We group our net revenue consistent with our three target markets which comprise our reportable segments, as discussed above.

With respect to the sales of integrated circuit products, we have approximately 550 products that are grouped into approximately 70 product lines. We have concluded that these products constitute a group of similar products within each reportable segment in each of the following respects:

the integrated circuits marketed by each of our reportable segments are sold to one type of customer: manufacturers of wired and wireless communications equipment, which incorporate our integrated circuits into their electronic products;
the integrated circuits sold by each of our reportable segments use the same standard CMOS manufacturing processes; and
all of our integrated circuits are sold through a centralized sales force and common wholesale distributors.


18


We also report an “All Other” category, which included income from the Qualcomm Agreement in prior periods, since it was principally the result of corporate efforts, and also includes operating expenses that we do not allocate to our reportable segments as these expenses are not included in the segment operating performance measures evaluated by our CODM. Operating costs and expenses that are not allocated include stock-based compensation, amortization of purchased intangible assets, amortization of acquired inventory valuation step-up, impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets, net settlement costs (gains), net restructuring costs, charitable contributions, non-recurring legal fees, change in contingent earnout liability, gain (loss) on sale of assets, employer payroll tax on certain stock option exercises, and other miscellaneous expenses related to corporate allocations that were either over or under the original projections at the beginning of the year. We include stock-based compensation and acquisition-related items in the “All Other” category as decisions regarding equity compensation are made at the corporate level and our CODM reviews reportable segment performance exclusive of these charges. Our CODM does not review information regarding total assets, interest income or income taxes on a segment basis. The accounting policies for segment reporting are the same as for Broadcom as a whole.

The following tables present details of our reportable segments and the “All Other” category: 
 
Reportable Segments
 
 
 
 
 
Broadband Communications
 
Mobile and Wireless
 
Infrastructure and Networking
 
All Other
 
Consolidated
 
(In millions)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net revenue
$
625

 
$
781

 
$
635

 
$

 
$
2,041

Operating income (loss)
175

 
(21
)
 
253

 
(393
)
 
14

Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net revenue
$
568

 
$
969

 
$
510

 
$
43

 
$
2,090

Operating income (loss)
137

 
96

 
151

 
(632
)
 
(248
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reportable Segments
 
 
 
 
 
Broadband Communications
 
Mobile and Wireless
 
Infrastructure and Networking
 
All Other
 
Consolidated
 
(In millions)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net revenue
$
1,184

 
$
1,627

 
$
1,214

 
$

 
$
4,025

Operating income (loss)
311

 
(53
)
 
457

 
(531
)
 
184

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net revenue
$
1,105

 
$
1,964

 
$
940

 
$
86

 
$
4,095

Operating income (loss)
261

 
219

 
249

 
(779
)
 
(50
)


19


Included In All Other Category:
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In millions)
Net revenue
$

 
$
43

 
$

 
$
86

Stock-based compensation
$
113

 
$
136

 
$
233

 
$
276

Amortization of purchased intangible assets
56

 
58

 
115

 
116

Inventory charges related to the exit of the cellular baseband business
34

 

 
34

 
1

Impairments of long-lived assets
165

 
501

 
190

 
511

Settlement costs
16

 

 
18

 

Restructuring costs, net
23

 

 
28

 

Other gains, net
(7
)
 

 
(59
)
 

Employer payroll tax on certain stock option exercises
3

 
1

 
4

 
3

Miscellaneous corporate allocation variances
(10
)
 
(21
)
 
(32
)
 
(42
)
Total other operating costs and expenses
$
393

 
$
675

 
$
531

 
$
865

Total operating loss for the “All Other” category
$
(393
)
 
$
(632
)
 
$
(531
)
 
$
(779
)

Significant Customer and Geographical Information

Sales to our significant customers, including sales to their manufacturing subcontractors, as a percentage of net revenue
were as follows:
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Two largest customers
24.4
%
 
32.3
%
 
27.3
%
 
34.5
%
Five largest customers as a group
43.0

 
46.9

 
44.2

 
48.6


The geographical distribution of our shipments, as a percentage of product revenue, was as follows: 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
China (exclusive of Hong Kong)
22.1
%
 
21.9
%
 
22.4
%
 
21.7
%
Hong Kong
32.5

 
29.1

 
30.0

 
26.9

Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand and Japan
29.4

 
34.8

 
32.1

 
37.4

United States
4.9

 
2.8

 
4.6

 
3.2

Europe
2.0

 
1.7

 
2.0

 
1.7

Other
9.1

 
9.7

 
8.9

 
9.1

 
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
 
100.0
%



20



Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Cautionary Statement

The information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is intended to update the information contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, referred to as our 2013 Annual Report, and presumes that readers have access to, and will have read, the “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and other information contained in such Form 10-K. The information in this Form 10-Q is also not a complete description of our business or the risks associated with an investment in our common stock. You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes thereto contained in Part I, Item 1 of this Report and the various other disclosures made by us in this Report and in our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, including our 2013 Annual Report and subsequent reports on Forms 10-Q and 8-K, which discuss our business in greater detail.

The section entitled “Risk Factors” contained in Part II, Item 1A of this Report, and similar discussions in our other SEC filings, describe some of the important risk factors that may affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and/or liquidity. You should carefully consider those risks, in addition to the other information in this Report and in our other filings with the SEC, before deciding to purchase, hold or sell our common stock.

All statements included or incorporated by reference in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, other than statements or characterizations of historical fact, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws, including the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning projected total net revenue, costs and expenses and product and total gross margin; our accounting estimates, assumptions and judgments; the amount and timing of reduced research & development and selling, general & administrative expenses resulting from the exit of our cellular baseband business, our ability to drive growth through our planned reinvestments in our Broadband, Infrastructure and remaining Mobile and Wireless businesses; the demand for our products; our dependence on a few key customers and/or design wins for a substantial portion of our revenue; our commitment to research and development efforts; the accuracy of our estimates and forecasts; estimates related to the amount and/or timing of the expensing of unearned stock-based compensation expense and stock-based compensation as a percentage of revenue; manufacturing, assembly and test capacity; the effect that economic conditions, seasonality and volume fluctuations in the demand for our customers’ consumer-oriented products will have on our quarterly operating results; our ability to adjust operations in response to changes in demand for existing products and services or the demand for new products requested by our customers; the competitive nature of and anticipated growth in our markets; our ability to consummate acquisitions and integrate their operations successfully; our ability to migrate to smaller process geometries; our success in pending intellectual property litigation matters; our potential needs for additional capital; inventory and accounts receivable levels; our ability to permanently reinvest our foreign earnings; the effect of potential changes in U.S. or foreign tax laws and regulations or the interpretation thereof; the level of accrued rebates; and our intention to continue to pay dividends. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry and business, management’s beliefs, and certain assumptions made by us, all of which are subject to change. Forward-looking statements can often be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “predicts,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “would,” “could,” “potential,” “continue,” “ongoing,” similar expressions, and variations or negatives of these words. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, some of which are listed under the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A of this Report. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Report. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statement to reflect future events or circumstances.

Additional Information
 
Investors and others should note that we announce material financial information using our company website (www.broadcom.com), our investor relations website (investors.broadcom.com), SEC filings, press releases, public conference calls and webcasts. Information about Broadcom and our business may also be announced by posts on the following social media channels:
 
B-Connected Blog (blog.broadcom.com
Broadcom's Twitter feed (www.twitter.com/Broadcom
Broadcom's Facebook page (www.facebook.com/Broadcom)
 

21


The information that we post on these social media channels could be deemed to be material information. As a result, we encourage investors, the media, and others interested in Broadcom to review the information that we post on these social media channels. These channels may be updated from time to time on our website. The information on or accessible through our websites and social media channels is not incorporated by reference in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Overview

Broadcom Corporation (including our subsidiaries, referred to collectively in this Report as “Broadcom,” “we,” “our” and “us”) is a global leader and innovator in semiconductor solutions for wired and wireless communications. Broadcom products seamlessly deliver voice, video, data and multimedia connectivity in the home, office and mobile environments. We provide the industry’s broadest portfolio of state-of-the-art system-on-a-chip solutions, or SoCs.

Our solutions are used globally by leading manufacturers and are embedded in an array of communications products that are structured around three core platforms: Broadband Communications (Solutions for the Home), Mobile and Wireless (Solutions for the Hand), and Infrastructure and Networking (Solutions for Infrastructure). Because we leverage our technologies across different markets, certain of our integrated circuits may be incorporated into products used in multiple platforms. We utilize independent foundries and third-party subcontractors to manufacture, assemble and test all of our semiconductor products.

Our diverse product portfolio includes:

Solutions for the Home - Highly-integrated and complete platform solutions for set-top boxes and broadband access.

Solutions for the Hand - Platforms primarily for mobile devices that include low-power, high-performance and highly integrated wireless connectivity solutions, cellular SoCs and other technologies.

Solutions for Infrastructure - Highly-integrated platforms for Infrastructure deployments that include Ethernet switches and PHYs, automotive Ethernet, communication processors and wireless infrastructure solutions, and Ethernet controllers.

A detailed discussion of our business may be found in our 2013 Annual Report under Part I, Item 1, “Business.”

Operating Results for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2014

In the three months ended June 30, 2014 our net loss was $1 million, as compared to a net loss of $251 million in the three months ended June 30, 2013. In the six months ended June 30, 2014 our net income was $164 million, as compared to a net loss of $60 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013. The resulting increases in profitability were primarily the result of charges for the impairment of purchased intangible assets of $501 million in June 2013, offset by the expiration of the Qualcomm Agreement (an agreement entered into in April 2009 with Qualcomm Incorporated) as well as the increase in our overall investment in our cellular baseband business and the subsequent impairment of long-lived assets of $130 million.
  
Exit of Cellular Baseband Business

On June 2, 2014, we announced that we were exploring strategic alternatives, including a potential sale and/or wind-down, for our cellular baseband business, included in our Mobile and Wireless reportable segment. We reached this decision based on our conclusion that the commercial and economic opportunity in this business was not sufficiently compelling to justify the continued investment, especially when compared to other opportunities within our product portfolio. On June 26, 2014, the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors approved a global restructuring plan that focuses on cost reductions and operating efficiencies and better aligns our resources to areas of strategic focus.

We have evaluated the number of employees and other resources necessary to support the ongoing business and recorded $23 million in restructuring charges in the three months ended June 30, 2014. These charges are comprised of (i) $18 million for ongoing termination benefits for 250 employees related to selling, general and administrative and other corporate functions and (ii) $5 million for certain non-cancelable contract costs. Communications to the impacted employees began in July 2014. We expect to record additional costs of approximately $5 million over the next twelve months for one-time termination benefits for these employees.

As of June 30, 2014 we had not made a determination as to whether we would exit the cellular baseband business through a sale or wind-down.  Therefore, the restructuring plan relating to cellular baseband employees (who are primarily engaged in

22


research and development) was subject to significant change and uncertainty since it was dependent upon the outcome of our effort to sell the business. In July 2014 we determined to pursue a wind-down of the cellular baseband business. As a result, we currently expect to (i) reduce our worldwide headcount by approximately an additional 2,250 employees, (ii) close or consolidate up to 18 locations and (iii) terminate certain contracts, which is expected to result in approximately $225 million of additional restructuring charges over the next twelve months.  Communications to these impacted employees also began in July 2014. These restructuring charges are considered a non-recognizable subsequent event for financial reporting purposes for the three months ended June 30, 2014.

Restructuring costs are primarily comprised of cash-based termination benefits and contract costs to be incurred without economic benefit. Due to various complexities in our international locations, some employee terminations may not be in effect for some time. We anticipate most of the expenses associated with this plan will be recognized within the next twelve months.

As part of these actions, we also recorded $130 million of non-cash charges for the impairment of certain long-lived assets and $34 million of inventory charges in the three months ending June 30, 2014. See Note 9 of Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

The wind-down of the cellular baseband business and associated cost saving initiatives is currently expected to result in up to approximately $700 million reduction in annualized research and development and selling, general and administrative expenses, of which up to approximately $100 million relates to estimated reductions in stock-based compensation. We currently expect to organically reinvest approximately $50 million of these savings on an annualized basis into projects in the Broadband, Infrastructure and the remaining Mobile and Wireless businesses. This incremental spending is currently expected to strengthen and accelerate our plans in the area of small cells, embedded processing and low-power connectivity.

Reportable Segments

The following table presents details of our reportable segments and the “All Other” category: 
 
Reportable Segments
 
 
 
 
 
Broadband Communications
 
Mobile and Wireless
 
Infrastructure and Networking
 
All Other
 
Consolidated
 
(In millions)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net revenue
$
625

 
$
781

 
$
635

 
$

 
$
2,041

Operating income (loss)
175

 
(21
)
 
253

 
(393
)
 
14

Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net revenue
$
559

 
$
846

 
$
579

 
$

 
$
1,984

Operating income (loss)
136

 
(32
)
 
204

 
(138
)
 
170

Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net revenue
$
568

 
$
969

 
$
510

 
$
43

 
$
2,090

Operating income (loss)
137

 
96

 
151

 
(632
)
 
(248
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reportable Segments
 
 
 
 
 
Broadband Communications
 
Mobile and Wireless
 
Infrastructure and Networking
 
All Other
 
Consolidated
 
(In millions)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net revenue
$
1,184

 
$
1,627

 
$
1,214

 
$

 
$
4,025

Operating income (loss)
311

 
(53
)
 
457

 
(531
)
 
184

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net revenue
$
1,105

 
$
1,964

 
$
940

 
$
86

 
$
4,095

Operating income (loss)
261

 
219

 
249

 
(779
)
 
(50
)

The increase in operating income for six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to six months ended June 30, 2013 for our Broadband Communications and Infrastructure and Networking reportable segments was driven primarily by maintaining operating expenses relatively flat, while increasing revenue by 7.1% and 29.1%, respectively. The operating loss for our

23


Mobile and Wireless reportable segment in the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to prior periods presented above, resulted primarily from a broad-based decline in revenue along with a significant year-over-year increase in research and development expense in cellular baseband technologies, principally related to our LTE product roadmap. As discussed above under "Exit of Cellular Baseband Business," we have decided to wind down our cellular baseband business as the commercial and economic opportunity is not sufficient to justify the continued investment.

For additional information about our reportable segments and the “All Other” category (including revenue and expense items reported under the "All Other" category), see further discussion in Note 11 of Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as well as "Net Revenue by Reportable Segments" discussion below.

Other highlights during the six months ended June 30, 2014 include the following:
Our cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities were $5.03 billion at June 30, 2014, compared with $4.37 billion at December 31, 2013.
We generated cash flow from operations of $831 million during the six months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to $722 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013.
In January 2014 our Board of Directors adopted an amendment to our existing dividend policy pursuant to which we increased our quarterly cash dividend by 9% to $0.12 per share ($0.48 per share on an annual basis) payable to holders of our common stock.
In March 2014 we sold certain Ethernet controller-related assets and provided non-exclusive licenses to intellectual property, including a non-exclusive patent license, to QLogic Corporation for a total of $209 million, referred to as the QLogic Transaction. In connection with the transaction, we recorded a gain on the sale of assets of $48 million (net of a goodwill adjustment of $37 million) and deferred revenue of $120 million.
In March 2014 we recorded impairment charges primarily for completed technology of $25 million related primarily to our acquisition of SC Square Ltd., or SC Square, and our purchase of LTE-related assets from affiliates of Renesas Electronics Corporation, or the Renesas Transaction.
We repurchased 6.2 million shares of our Class A common stock at a weighted average price of $30.79 during the three months ended June 30, 2014.
In June 2014 we recorded purchased intangible impairment charges of $35 million, related to our acquisition of NetLogic.
As discussed above under "Cellular Baseband Business Update and Associated Restructuring," we recorded restructuring costs of $23 million in June 2014. In addition, we recorded $130 million of non-cash charges for the impairment of certain long-lived assets and $34 million of inventory charges.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net revenue and expenses in the reporting period. We regularly evaluate our
estimates and assumptions related to revenue recognition, rebates, allowances for doubtful accounts, sales returns and allowances, warranty reserves, inventory reserves, stock-based compensation expense, long-lived asset valuations, strategic investments, deferred income tax asset valuation allowances, uncertain tax positions, tax contingencies, self-insurance, restructuring costs, litigation and other loss contingencies. We base our estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the recording of revenue, costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by us may differ materially and adversely from our estimates. To the extent there are material differences between our estimates and the actual results, our future results of operations will be affected. For a description of our critical accounting policies and estimates, please refer to the “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” section in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our 2013 Annual Report. There have been no material changes in any of our critical accounting policies and estimates during the six months ended June 30, 2014.

24


Results of Operations

The following table sets forth certain Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations data expressed as a percentage of net revenue for the periods indicated: 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30, 2014
 
March 31, 2014
 
June 30, 2013
 
June 30, 2014
 
June 30, 2013
Net revenue:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Product revenue
100.0
 %
 
100.0
 %
 
97.9
 %
 
100.0
 %
 
97.9
 %
Income from Qualcomm Agreement

 

 
2.1

 

 
2.1

Total net revenue
100.0

 
100.0

 
100.0

 
100.0

 
100.0

Costs and expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cost of product revenue
49.2

 
50.6

 
49.3

 
49.9

 
49.3

Research and development
31.1

 
31.9

 
29.6

 
31.7

 
30.1

Selling, general and administrative
8.9

 
9.3

 
8.3

 
9.1

 
8.6

Amortization of purchased intangible assets
0.4

 
0.5

 
0.7

 
0.4

 
0.7

Impairments of long-lived assets
8.1

 
1.3

 
24.0

 
4.7

 
12.5

Restructuring costs, net
1.1

 
0.3

 

 
0.7

 

Settlement costs
0.8

 
0.1

 

 
0.4

 

Other gains, net
(0.3
)
 
(2.6
)
 

 
(1.5
)
 

Total operating costs and expenses
99.3

 
91.4

 
111.9

 
95.4

 
101.2

Income (loss) from operations
0.7

 
8.6

 
(11.9
)
 
4.6

 
(1.2
)
Interest expense, net
(0.2
)
 
(0.3
)
 
(0.4
)
 
(0.2
)
 
(0.4
)
Other income (expense), net
(0.5
)
 
0.2

 
0.1

 
(0.2
)
 
0.1

Income (loss) before income taxes

 
8.5

 
(12.2
)
 
4.2

 
(1.5
)
Provision for (benefit of) income taxes

 
0.2

 
(0.2
)
 
0.1

 

Net income (loss)
 %
 
8.3
 %
 
(12.0
)%
 
4.1
 %
 
(1.5
)%

The following table presents supplementary financial data as a percentage of net revenue: 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30, 2014
 
March 31, 2014
 
June 30, 2013
 
June 30, 2014
 
June 30, 2013
Net Revenue By Reportable Segment
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Broadband Communications
30.6
%
 
28.2
%
 
27.2
%
 
29.4
%
 
27.0
%
Mobile and Wireless
38.3

 
42.6

 
46.3

 
40.4

 
47.9

Infrastructure and Networking
31.1

 
29.2

 
24.4

 
30.2

 
23.0

All Other

 

 
2.1

 

 
2.1

Gross Margin Data
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Product gross margin
50.8
%
 
49.4
%
 
49.7
%
 
50.1
%
 
49.7
%
Total gross margin
50.8

 
49.4

 
50.7

 
50.1

 
50.7

Stock-Based Compensation Expense (included in each functional line item)
Cost of product revenue
0.2
%
 
0.3
%
 
0.3
%
 
0.3
%
 
0.3
%
Research and development
3.9

 
4.2

 
4.5

 
4.1

 
4.7

Selling, general and administrative
1.4

 
1.5

 
1.7

 
1.4

 
1.7



25


Net Revenue By Reportable Segments

The following tables present net revenue from each of our reportable segments: 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Quarter over Quarter
 
Year over Year
 
June 30, 2014
 
March 31, 2014
 
June 30, 2013
 
$ Change
 
% Change
 
$ Change
 
% Change
 
(In millions, except percentages)
Broadband Communications
$
625

 
$
559

 
$
568

 
$
66

 
11.8
 %
 
$
57

 
10.0
 %
Mobile and Wireless
781

 
846

 
969

 
(65
)
 
(7.7
)
 
(188
)
 
(19.4
)
Infrastructure and Networking
635

 
579

 
510

 
56

 
9.7

 
125

 
24.5

All Other

 

 
43

 

 

 
(43
)
 
(100.0
)
Total net revenue
$
2,041

 
$
1,984

 
$
2,090

 
$
57

 
2.9

 
$
(49
)
 
(2.3
)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Six Months Ended
 
Year over Year
 
June 30, 2014
 
June 30, 2013
 
$ Change
 
% Change
 
(In millions, except percentages)
Broadband Communications
$
1,184

 
$
1,105

 
$
79

 
7.1
 %
Mobile and Wireless
1,627

 
1,964

 
(337
)
 
(17.2
)
Infrastructure and Networking
1,214

 
940

 
274

 
29.1

All Other

 
86

 
(86
)
 
(100.0
)
Total net revenue
$
4,025

 
$
4,095

 
$
(70
)
 
(1.7
)


Broadband Communications. The increase in net revenue in the three months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2014, resulted primarily from an increase in sales of our broadband modems of $38 million and our set-top box (STB) solutions of $28 million. The increase in net revenue in the three months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013, resulted primarily from an increase in sales of our broadband modem solutions of $35 million and our STB solutions of $22 million. The increase in net revenue in the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to six months ended June 30, 2013 resulted primarily from an increase in sales of our broadband modem solutions of $56 million and our STB solutions of $23 million. Growth in sales of broadband modem solutions is generally driven by subscriber growth and momentum in emerging areas, such as small cells. STB growth is generally driven by global subscriber growth, the adoption of new communication features (including HEVC, transcoding and MoCA 2.0), market share gains and the roll-out of more highly integrated platforms by global service providers.

Mobile and Wireless. The decrease in net revenue in the three months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2014, resulted primarily from a decrease in sales of our cellular SoCs in our cellular baseband business of $58 million. The decrease in net revenue in the three months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013, resulted primarily from decreases in sales of wireless connectivity products of $133 million and of our cellular SoCs of $54 million. The decrease in net revenue in the six months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to six months ended June 30, 2013, resulted primarily from decreases in sales of our wireless connectivity products of $204 million, our cellular SoCs of $88 million and other technologies incorporated primarily into handheld devices of $45 million. The decreases in revenue related to wireless connectivity and other technologies incorporated primarily into handheld devices were driven principally by the impact of a decelerating smartphone market, particularly in higher-end devices, and reduced sales into low-cost smartphones. Low-cost smartphones have trended toward integrated platforms from single suppliers, which tend not to include Broadcom solutions. The decreases in revenue related to our cellular SoCs were driven at least in part by our decision to exit our cellular baseband business.

We recorded net revenue of $84 million, $142 million and $138 million in the three months ended June 30, 2014March 31, 2014, and June 30, 2013, respectively, related to our cellular baseband business. In the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, we recorded net revenue of $226 million and $314 million, respectively, related to our cellular baseband business. Due to our announced exit of our cellular baseband business, we expect this revenue to significantly ramp down in the near term and trend to zero over the next twelve to eighteen months.


26


Infrastructure and Networking. The increase in net revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2014, resulted primarily from an increase in sales of our Ethernet switches and PHYs of $46 million. The increase in net revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013, resulted primarily from an increase in sales of Ethernet switches and PHYs of $105 million. The increase in net revenue in the six months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013, resulted from increases in sales of our Ethernet switches and PHYs of $235 million, communication processor and wireless infrastructure products of $24 million and our Ethernet controller products of $15 million. Growth in Ethernet switches and PHYs is generally driven by continued build outs of packet-based networks to support the delivery of video and mobile data over the Internet, an increase in hosted services and cloud computing, and the ongoing growth in unified communications in the enterprise.

Rebates. We recorded customer rebates of $176 million, or 8.6% of net revenue, $187 million, or 9.4% of net revenue, and $192 million, or 9.2% of net revenue, in the three months ended June 30, 2014March 31, 2014, and June 30, 2013, respectively. We recorded customer rebates of $363 million, or 9.0% of net revenue, and $353 million, or 8.6% of net revenue, in the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. We reverse the accrual of unclaimed rebate amounts as specific rebate programs contractually end or when we believe unclaimed rebates are no longer subject to payment and will not be paid. We reversed accrued rebates of $13 million, $6 million and $7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2014March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2013, respectively. We reversed accrued rebates of $19 million and $13 million in the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. We anticipate that accrued rebates will vary in future periods based upon the level of overall sales to customers that participate in our rebate programs.

Concentration of Net Revenue

Sales to our significant customers, including sales to their manufacturing subcontractors, as a percentage of net revenue were as follows:
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30, 2014
 
March 31, 2014
 
June 30, 2013
 
June 30, 2014
 
June 30, 2013
Two largest customers
24.4
%
 
30.2
%
 
32.3
%
 
27.3
%
 
34.5
%
Five largest customers as a group
43.0

 
45.5

 
46.9

 
44.2

 
48.6


We expect that our largest customers will continue to account for a substantial portion of our total net revenue for the foreseeable future. However, we cannot predict whether our decision to exit the cellular baseband business will negatively impact those relationships. Our largest customers and their respective contributions to our total net revenue have varied and will likely continue to vary from period to period.

From time to time, our key customers place large orders causing our quarterly net revenue to fluctuate significantly. We expect that these fluctuations will continue and that they may be exaggerated by the seasonal variations in consumer products and changes in the overall economic environment. For these and other reasons, our total net revenue and results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and prior periods may not necessarily be indicative of future net revenue and results of operations.

Total Net Revenue, Cost of Product Revenue, Product Gross Margin, and Total Gross Margin

The following tables present total net revenue, cost of product revenue, product gross margin and total gross margin: 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Quarter over Quarter
 
Year over Year
 
June 30, 2014
 
March 31, 2014
 
June 30, 2013
 
$ Change
 
% Change
 
$ Change
 
% Change
 
(In millions, except percentages)
Product revenue
$
2,041

 
$
1,984

 
$
2,047

 
$
57

 
2.9
%
 
$
(6
)
 
(0.3
)%
Income from Qualcomm Agreement

 

 
43

 

 

 
(43
)
 
(100.0
)
Total net revenue
$
2,041

 
$
1,984

 
$
2,090

 
$
57

 
2.9

 
$
(49
)
 
(2.3
)
Cost of product revenue
$
1,005

 
$
1,004

 
$
1,030

 
$
1

 
0.1

 
$
(25
)
 
(2.4
)
Product gross margin
50.8
%
 
49.4
%
 
49.7
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total gross margin
50.8
%
 
49.4
%
 
50.7
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

27


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Six Months Ended
 
Year over Year
 
June 30, 2014
 
June 30, 2013
 
$ Change
 
% Change
 
(In millions, except percentages)
Product revenue
$
4,025

 
$
4,009

 
$
16

 
0.4
 %
Income from Qualcomm Agreement

 
86

 
(86
)
 
(100.0
)
Total net revenue
$
4,025

 
$
4,095

 
$
(70
)
 
(1.7
)
Cost of product revenue
$
2,009

 
$
2,018

 
$
(9
)
 
(0.4
)
Product gross margin
50.1
%
 
49.7
%
 
 
 
 
Total gross margin
50.1
%
 
50.7
%
 
 
 
 

Cost of Product Revenue and Product Gross Margin. Cost of product revenue comprises the cost of our semiconductor devices, which consists of the cost of purchasing finished silicon wafers manufactured by independent foundries, costs associated with our purchase of assembly, test and quality assurance services and packaging materials for semiconductor products, as well as royalties and license fees paid to vendors and to non-practicing entities, or NPEs. Also included in cost of product revenue is the amortization of purchased technology and inventory valuation step-up, and manufacturing overhead, including costs of personnel and equipment associated with manufacturing support, product warranty costs, provisions for excess and obsolete inventories, and stock-based compensation expense for personnel engaged in manufacturing support. Product gross margin is product revenue less cost of product revenue divided by product revenue and does not include income from the Qualcomm Agreement. Total gross margin is total net revenue less cost of product revenue divided by total net revenue.

Product gross margin increased in all periods presented as a result of an increase in our Infrastructure and Networking reportable segment (which products typically produce higher product gross margins), as well as a decline in revenue related to our cellular baseband business (which products typically produce lower product gross margins). The benefit to product gross margin in the three months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2014, was partially offset by an increase in excess and obsolete inventory expense of $29 million. The benefit to product gross margin in the three months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013, was also partially offset by an increase in excess and obsolete inventory expense of $20 million. The excess and obsolete inventory expenses primarily related to reductions in our forecast following our decision to exit the cellular baseband business.

Product gross margin includes $12 million, $10 million and $12 million of licensing revenue related to our intellectual property in the three months ended June 30, 2014March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2013, respectively. Product gross margin also includes $2 million, $2 million and $7 million of licensing costs related to NPEs in the three months ended June 30, 2014March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2013, respectively.

Product gross margin includes $22 million and $20 million of licensing revenue related to our intellectual property in the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Product gross margin includes $4 million and $14 million of licensing costs related to NPEs in each of the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Our product and total gross margin may also be impacted by, among other items, additional stock-based compensation expense, as discussed below, and the amortization of purchased intangible assets related to future acquisitions.

Research and Development Expense

Research and development expense consists primarily of salaries and related costs of employees engaged in research, design and development activities, including stock-based compensation expense. Development and design costs consist primarily of costs related to engineering design tools, mask and prototyping costs, testing and subcontracting costs. In addition, we incur costs related to facilities and equipment expense, among other items.


28


The following tables present details of research and development expense: 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Quarter over Quarter
 
Year over Year
 
June 30, 2014
 
March 31, 2014
 
June 30, 2013
 
$ Change
 
% Change
 
$ Change
 
% Change
 
(In millions, except percentages)
Salaries and benefits
$
376

 
$
372

 
$
349

 
$
4

 
1.1
 %
 
$
27

 
7.7
 %
Stock-based compensation
80

 
84

 
95

 
(4
)
 
(4.8
)
 
(15
)
 
(15.8
)
Development and design costs
86

 
88

 
95

 
(2
)
 
(2.3
)
 
(9
)
 
(9.5
)
Other
92

 
92

 
80

 

 

 
12

 
15.0

Research and development
$
634

 
$
636

 
$
619

 
$
(2
)
 
(0.3
)%
 
$
15

 
2.4
 %

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Six Months Ended
 
Year over Year
 
June 30, 2014
 
June 30, 2013
 
$ Change
 
% Change
 
(In millions, except percentages)
Salaries and benefits
$
748

 
$
697

 
$
51

 
7.3
 %
Stock-based compensation
164

 
194

 
(30
)
 
(15.5
)
Development and design costs
174

 
188

 
(14
)
 
(7.4
)
Other
184

 
155

 
29

 
18.7

Research and development
$
1,270

 
$
1,234

 
$
36

 
2.9
 %


The increase in salaries and benefits for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, was primarily attributable to an increase in headcount of approximately 650 personnel, mostly due to the Renesas Transaction, offset by our restructuring in late 2013, bringing research and development headcount to approximately 9,750 at June 30, 2014. This represents a 7.1% increase from June 30, 2013. Salaries and benefits also increased as a result of an increase in cash compensation levels in connection with our annual merit review program. See below for a discussion of stock-based compensation. Development and design costs vary from period to period depending on the timing of development and tape-out of various products. The increases in the Other line item are primarily attributable to an increase in depreciation expenses related to the Renesas Transaction.

We remain committed to significant research and development efforts to extend our technology leadership in the wired and wireless communications markets in which we operate. Factors that may impact research and development costs include the diversification of the markets we serve, new product opportunities, the number of design wins that go into production, changes in our compensation policies, and any expansion into new markets and technologies, including acquisitions. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, approximately 45% and 35% of our products were manufactured in 40 nanometers and 65 nanometers, respectively. We are designing most new products in 40 nanometers and 28 nanometers, and are beginning to develop products leveraging FinFET technologies. We currently hold more than 9,600 U.S. and more than 3,800 foreign patents and have more than 7,450 additional U.S. and foreign pending patent applications. We maintain an active program of filing for and acquiring additional U.S. and foreign patents in wired and wireless communications and other fields.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense

Selling, general and administrative expense consists primarily of personnel-related expenses, including stock-based compensation expense, legal and other professional fees, facilities expenses and communications expenses.


29


The following tables present details of selling, general and administrative expense: 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Quarter over Quarter
 
Year over Year
 
June 30, 2014
 
March 31, 2014
 
June 30, 2013
 
$ Change
 
% Change
 
$ Change
 
% Change
 
(In millions, except percentages)
Salaries and benefits
$
95

 
$
91

 
$
85

 
$
4

 
4.4
 %
 
$
10

 
11.8
 %
Stock-based compensation
28

 
30

 
35

 
(2
)
 
(6.7
)
 
(7
)
 
(20.0
)
Legal and accounting fees
19

 
21

 
24

 
(2
)
 
(9.5
)
 
(5
)
 
(20.8
)
Other
40

 
43

 
30

 
(3
)
 
(7.0
)
 
10

 
33.3

Selling, general and administrative
$
182

 
$
185

 
$
174

 
$
(3
)
 
(1.6
)%
 
$
8

 
4.6
 %

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Six Months Ended
 
Year over Year
 
June 30, 2014
 
June 30, 2013
 
$ Change
 
% Change
 
(In millions, except percentages)
Salaries and benefits
$
186

 
$
173

 
$
13

 
7.5
 %
Stock-based compensation
58

 
69

 
(11
)
 
(15.9
)
Legal and accounting fees
40

 
47

 
(7
)
 
(14.9
)
Other
83

 
64

 
19

 
29.7

Selling, general and administrative
$
367

 
$
353

 
$
14

 
4.0
 %

The increase in salaries and benefits in the six months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013, was attributable to an increase in headcount of approximately 100 personnel, mostly due to the Renesas Transaction, bringing selling, general and administrative headcount to approximately 2,050 at June 30, 2014. This represents a 5.1% increase from June 30, 2013. Salaries and benefits also increased as a result of an increase in cash compensation levels in connection with our annual merit review program. See below for a discussion of stock-based compensation. The increases in the Other line item were primarily attributable to an increase in facilities expenses.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

The following tables present details of total stock-based compensation expense that is included in each functional line item in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income: 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Quarter over Quarter
 
Year over Year
 
June 30, 2014
 
March 31, 2014
 
June 30, 2013
 
$ Change
 
% Change
 
$ Change
 
% Change
 
(In millions, except percentages)
Cost of product revenue
$
5

 
$
6

 
$
6

 
$
(1
)
 
(16.7
)%
 
$
(1
)
 
(16.7
)%
Research and development
80

 
84

 
95

 
(4
)
 
(4.8
)
 
(15
)
 
(15.8
)
Selling, general and administrative
28

 
30

 
35

 
(2
)
 
(6.7
)
 
(7
)
 
(20.0
)
 
$
113

 
$
120

 
$
136

 
$
(7
)
 
(5.8
)%
 
$
(23
)
 
(16.9
)%

30



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Six Months Ended
 
Year over Year
 
June 30, 2014
 
June 30, 2013
 
$ Change
 
% Change
 
(In millions, except percentages)
Cost of product revenue
$
11

 
$
13

 
$
(2
)
 
(15.4
)%
Research and development
164

 
194

 
(30
)
 
(15.5
)
Selling, general and administrative
58

 
69

 
(11
)
 
(15.9
)
 
$
233

 
$
276

 
$
(43
)
 
(15.6
)%

The decrease in stock-based compensation in the six months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013, was primarily attributable to certain assumed equity awards becoming fully vested during 2013 and the reversal of stock-based compensation of $7 million related to a revised forfeiture rate due to the decision to exit our cellular baseband business. In the six months ended June 30, 2014, we granted equity awards with a fair value of $400 million, primarily related to our regular annual equity compensation review program, which will be expensed over the next four years.

The following table presents details of unearned stock-based compensation currently estimated to be expensed in the remainder of 2014 and through 2018 related to unvested share-based payment awards: 
 
2014
 
2015
 
2016
 
2017
 
2018
 
Total
 
(In millions)
Unearned stock-based compensation
$
227

 
$
335

 
$
216

 
$
110

 
$
17

 
$
905


If there are any modifications or cancellations of the underlying unvested awards, including the cancellation of awards held by employees impacted by our current restructuring plan, we may be required to accelerate, increase or cancel any remaining unearned stock-based compensation expense. Future stock-based compensation expense and unearned stock-based compensation will increase to the extent that we grant additional equity awards or assume unvested equity awards in connection with acquisitions. See Note 7 of Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of activity related to share-based awards.

Amortization of Purchased Intangible Assets

The following tables present details of the amortization of purchased intangible assets included in the cost of product revenue and other operating expense categories:
 
Three Months Ended
 
Quarter over Quarter
 
Year over Year
 
June 30, 2014
 
March 31, 2014
 
June 30, 2013
 
$ Change
 
% Change
 
$ Change
 
% Change
 
(In millions, except percentages)
Cost of product revenue
$
47

 
$
50

 
$
44

 
$
(3
)
 
(6.0
)%
 
$
3

 
6.8
 %
Other operating expenses
9

 
9

 
14

 

 

 
(5
)
 
(35.7
)
 
$
56

 
$
59

 
$
58

 
$
(3
)
 
(5.1
)%
 
$
(2
)
 
(3.4
)%

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Six Months Ended
 
Year over Year
 
June 30, 2014
 
June 30, 2013
 
$ Change
 
% Change
 
(In millions, except percentages)
Cost of product revenue
$
97

 
$
87

 
$
10

 
11.5
 %
Other operating expenses
18

 
29

 
(11
)
 
(37.9
)
 
$
115

 
$
116

 
$
(1
)
 
(0.9
)%

The amortization of purchased intangible assets reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible assets were consumed or otherwise used.

31



The following table presents details of the amortization of existing purchased intangible assets (including IPR&D), currently estimated to be expensed in the remainder of 2014 and thereafter: 
 
Purchased Intangible Asset Amortization by Year
 
2014
 
2015
 
2016
 
2017
 
2018
 
Thereafter
 
Total
 
(In millions)
Cost of product revenue
$
92

 
$
170

 
$
147

 
$
127

 
$
108

 
$
285

 
$
929

Other operating expenses
17

 
13

 
6

 
3

 
2

 
2

 
43

 
$
109

 
$
183

 
$
153

 
$
130

 
$
110

 
$
287

 
$
972


Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

See discussion of our impairment of long-lived assets in Notes 9 and 10 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as it relates to our decision to exit the cellular baseband business and wind down those operations, as well as our acquisition of NetLogic.

Restructuring Costs

See discussion of our restructuring costs in our "Exit of Cellular Baseband Business" above and in Note 9 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Settlement Costs

We recorded settlement costs of $16 million and $18 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, related to the settlement of patent infringement claims. We did not record any settlement costs in the three and six months ended June 30, 2013. See Note 8 of Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other Gains, Net

See discussion of our Other Gains, Net, in Note 2 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as it relates to the sale of certain Ethernet controller-related assets to QLogic in the three months ended March 31, 2014.

Provision for (Benefit of) Income Taxes

The following table presents details of the provision for (benefit of) income taxes and our effective tax rates:
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30, 2014
 
March 31, 2014
 
June 30, 2013
 
June 30, 2014
 
June 30, 2013
 
(In millions, except percentages)
Provision for (benefit of) income taxes
$
2

 
$
3

 
$
(3
)
 
5

 
(1
)
Effective tax rates
200.0
%
 
1.8
%
 
1.2
%
 
3.0
%
 
1.6
%

The differences between our effective tax rates and the 35% federal statutory rate resulted primarily from foreign earnings taxed at substantially lower rates than the federal statutory rate and domestic tax losses recorded without tax benefits. In determining our annualized effective tax rates, the tax effects of the impairments of long-lived assets of $165 million, $25 million and $501 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014, March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2013, respectively, $23 million of restructuring costs for the three months ended June 30, 2014, $48 million gain on sale of assets for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and six months ended June 30, 2014, and the impairments of long-lived assets of $190 million and $511 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, were treated as discrete items. As a result, we recorded discrete tax benefits for the impairments of long-lived assets of $8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, and $5 million and $10 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. We also recorded discrete tax benefits of $5 million, $4 million and $4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014, March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2013, respectively, and $9 million and $6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, resulting primarily from the expiration of statutes of limitations for the assessment of taxes in various foreign jurisdictions.


32


Liquidity and Capital Resources

Working Capital and Cash and Marketable Securities.

The following table presents working capital, cash and cash equivalents, and marketable securities: 
 
June 30,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
 
$ Change
 
(In millions)
Working capital
$
3,104

 
$
2,419

 
$
685

 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
2,364

 
$
1,657

 
707

Short-term marketable securities
769

 
775

 
(6
)
Long-term marketable securities
1,892

 
1,939

 
(47
)
Total cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities
$
5,025

 
$
4,371

 
$
654


See discussion of market risk that follows in Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Cash Provided and Used in the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
831

 
$
722

Net cash used in investing activities
(17
)
 
(539
)
Net cash used in financing activities
(107
)
 
(155
)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
707

 
28

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
1,657

 
1,617

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
2,364

 
$
1,645


Operating Activities

In the six months ended June 30, 2014 our operating activities provided $831 million in cash. This was primarily the result of net income of $164 million, net non-cash operating expenses of $590 million, and changes in operating assets and liabilities of $77 million. The changes in operating assets and liabilities were primarily driven by increases in accounts payables and deferred revenue recorded in connection with the QLogic Transaction. In the six months ended June 30, 2013 our operating activities provided $722 million in cash. This was primarily the result of net non-cash operating expenses of $980 million, offset in part by changes in operating assets and liabilities of $198 million and a net loss of $60 million.

Our days sales outstanding increased from 35 days at December 31, 2013 to 36 days at June 30, 2014. We typically bill customers on an open account basis subject to our standard net thirty day payment terms. If, in the longer term, our revenue increases, it is likely that our accounts receivable balance will also increase. Additionally, accounts receivable could increase due to fluctuations in concentrations of revenue with customers under rebate programs, which may result in higher levels of accounts receivables and accrued rebates on our balance sheet. Our accounts receivable could also increase if customers delay their payments or if we grant extended payment terms to customers, both of which are more likely to occur during challenging economic times when our customers may have difficulty gaining access to sufficient credit on a timely basis.

Our inventory days on hand increased from 47 days at December 31, 2013 to 56 days at June 30, 2014 primarily to meet anticipated revenue levels in the three months ending September 30, 2014. In the future, our inventory levels will continue to be determined by the level of purchase orders we receive and the stage at which our products are in their respective product life cycles, our ability, and the ability of our customers, to manage inventory under hubbing arrangements, and competitive situations in the marketplace. Such considerations are balanced against the risk of obsolescence or potentially excess inventory levels.


33


Investing Activities

Investing activities used $17 million in cash in the six months ended June 30, 2014, which was primarily the result of $158 million of capital equipment purchases to support our research and development efforts, offset in part by $90 million from the QLogic Transaction and $57 million in net proceeds of marketable securities. Investing activities used $539 million in cash in the six months ended June 30, 2013, which was primarily the result of $108 million of capital equipment purchases to support our research and development efforts and $431 million in net purchases of marketable securities.

Financing Activities

Our financing activities used $107 million in cash in the six months ended June 30, 2014, which was primarily the result of $191 million in repurchases of our Class A common stock, dividend payments of $140 million and $59 million in minimum tax withholding paid on behalf of employees for shares issued pursuant to restricted stock units, or RSUs, offset in part by $283 million in proceeds received from issuances of common stock upon the exercise of stock options. Our financing activities used $155 million in cash in the six months ended June 30, 2013, which was primarily the result of $217 million in repurchases of our Class A common stock, dividend payments of $127 million, and $78 million in minimum tax withholding paid on behalf of employees for shares issued pursuant to RSUs, offset in part by $267 million in proceeds received from issuances of common stock upon the exercise of stock options.

The timing and number of stock option exercises and employee stock purchases and the amount of cash proceeds we receive from these equity awards are not within our control. As it is now our general practice to issue RSUs instead of stock options we will likely not generate as much cash from the exercise of stock options as we have in the past. Unlike the exercise of stock options, the issuance of shares upon vesting of RSUs does not result in any cash proceeds to Broadcom and in fact requires the use of cash, as we currently allow employees to have a portion of the shares issued upon vesting of RSUs withheld to satisfy minimum statutory withholding taxes. This withholding procedure requires that we pay cash to the appropriate tax authorities on each participating employee's behalf.

Short and Long-Term Financing Arrangements

At June 30, 2014, we had the following resources available to obtain short-term or long-term financings if we need additional liquidity:

Registration Statements

We have a Form S-4 acquisition shelf registration statement on file with the SEC. The registration statement on Form S-4 enables us to issue up to 30 million shares of our Class A common stock in one or more acquisition transactions. These transactions may include the acquisition of assets, businesses or securities by any form of business combination. To date no securities have been issued pursuant to the S-4 registration statement, which does not have an expiration date mandated by SEC rules.

Credit Facility

In November 2010 we entered into a credit facility with certain institutional lenders that provides for unsecured revolving facility loans, swing line loans and letters of credit in an aggregate amount of up to $500 million. This credit facility, which was amended in October 2011, has a maturity date of November 19, 2016, at which time all outstanding revolving facility loans (if any) and accrued and unpaid interest must be repaid. We have not drawn on the credit facility since its inception.

The credit facility contains customary representations, warranties and covenants. Financial covenants require us to maintain a consolidated leverage ratio of no more than 3.25 to 1.00 and a consolidated interest coverage ratio of no less than 3.00 to 1.00. We were in compliance with all credit facility debt covenants as of June 30, 2014.


34


Senior Notes

The following table summarizes details of our senior unsecured notes, or Notes: 
 
June 30,
2014
 
(In millions)
2.375% fixed-rate notes, due November 2015
$
400

2.700% fixed-rate notes, due November 2018
500

2.500% fixed-rate notes, due August 2022
500

 
$
1,400

Unaccreted discount
(5
)
 
$
1,395


The outstanding Notes described above contain a number of customary representations, warranties and restrictive covenants, including, but not limited to, restrictions on our ability to grant liens on assets; enter into sale and lease-back transactions; or merge, consolidate or sell assets. Failure to comply with these covenants, or any other event of default, could result in acceleration of the principal amount and accrued and unpaid interest on the Notes.

Other Notes and Borrowings

We had no other significant notes or borrowings as of June 30, 2014.

Commitments and Other Contractual Obligations

There have been no material changes in the six months ended June 30, 2014 to the amounts presented in the table under the "Commitments and Other Contractual Obligations" section in Part II, Item 7, "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation" of our 2013 Annual Report.

Prospective Capital Needs

We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, together with cash generated from operations and from the issuance of common stock through our employee stock option and purchase plans, will be sufficient to cover our working capital needs, capital expenditures, investment requirements, commitments, repurchases of our Class A common stock and quarterly dividends for at least the next 12 months. However, it is possible that we may choose to raise additional funds or draw on our existing credit facility to finance our activities beyond the next 12 months or to consummate acquisitions of other businesses, assets, products or technologies. If needed, we may be able to raise such funds by selling equity or debt securities to the public or to selected investors or by borrowing money from financial institutions. We could also reduce certain expenditures, such as repurchases of our Class A common stock and payments of our quarterly dividends.

We earn a significant amount of our operating income outside the U.S., which is deemed to be permanently reinvested in foreign jurisdictions. For at least the next 12 months, we have sufficient cash in the U.S. and expect domestic cash flow to sustain our operating activities and cash commitments for investing and financing activities, such as acquisitions, quarterly dividends, share buy-backs and repayment of debt. In addition, we expect existing foreign cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, and cash flows from operations to continue to be sufficient to fund our foreign operating activities and cash commitments for investing activities, such as material capital expenditures, for at least the next 12 months. If we were to repatriate substantially all of our foreign earnings, which are indefinitely reinvested, it would not result in a significant tax liability because the amounts would be offset by our remaining net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. As of June 30, 2014 we have approximately $2.92 billion of cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities held by our foreign subsidiaries.

In addition, even though we may not need additional funds, we may still elect to sell additional equity or debt securities or utilize or increase our existing credit facilities for other reasons. However, we may not be able to obtain additional funds on a timely basis at acceptable terms, if at all. If we raise additional funds by issuing additional equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership percentages of existing shareholders would be reduced. In addition, the equity or debt securities that we issue may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of our Class A common stock.


35


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At June 30, 2014 we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements, other than our facility operating leases.

Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk

We manage our total portfolio to encompass a diversified pool of investment-grade securities to preserve principal and maintain liquidity. The average credit rating of our marketable securities portfolio by major credit rating agencies was Aa3/AA-. Investments in both fixed rate and floating rate instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. Fixed rate securities may have their market value adversely impacted due to an increase in interest rates, while floating rate securities may produce less income than expected if interest rates fall. Due in part to these factors, our future investment income, net, may fall short of expectations due to changes in interest rates or if the decline in fair value of our publicly traded fixed income investments is judged to be other-than-temporary. We may suffer losses in principal if we are forced to sell securities that have declined in market value due to changes in interest rates. However, because any fixed income securities we hold are classified as available-for-sale, no gains or losses are realized in the income statement due to changes in interest rates unless such securities are sold prior to maturity or unless declines in value are determined to be other-than-temporary. These securities are reported at fair value with the related unrealized gains and losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income, a component of shareholders’ equity, net of tax.

To assess the interest rate risk associated with our investment portfolio, we performed a sensitivity analysis to determine the impact a change in interest rates would have on the value of the investment portfolio assuming a 100 basis point parallel shift in the yield curve. Based on investment positions as of June 30, 2014, a 100 basis point increase in interest rates across all maturities would result in a $27 million incremental decline in the fair market value of the portfolio. Such losses would only be realized if we sold the investments prior to maturity.

Actual future gains and losses associated with our investments may differ from the sensitivity analysis performed as of June 30, 2014 due to the inherent limitations associated with predicting the changes in the timing and level of interest rates and our actual exposures and positions.

A hypothetical increase of 100 basis points in short-term interest rates would not have a material impact on our revolving credit facility, which bears a floating interest rate. This sensitivity analysis assumes all other variables will remain constant in future periods.

Our Notes bear fixed interest rates, and therefore, would not be subject to interest rate risk.

Exchange Rate Risk

We consider our direct exposure to foreign exchange rate fluctuations to be minimal. Currently, sales to customers and arrangements with third-party manufacturers provide for pricing and payment in United States dollars and, therefore, are not subject to exchange rate fluctuations. Increases in the value of the United States’ dollar relative to other currencies could make our products more expensive, which could negatively impact our ability to compete. Conversely, decreases in the value of the United States dollar relative to other currencies could result in our suppliers raising their prices to continue doing business with us. Our direct exposure to foreign exchange rate fluctuations is limited primarily to employee costs for employees based outside of the U.S. Fluctuations in currency exchange rates could affect our business in the future.

Item 4.
Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We are committed to maintaining disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily is required to

36


apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures and implementing controls and procedures based on the application of management’s judgment.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of June 30, 2014, the end of the period covered by this Report.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the three months ended June 30, 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitations on Internal Control

A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of management override or improper acts, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple errors or mistakes. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to management override, error or improper acts may occur and not be detected. Any resulting misstatement or loss may have an adverse and material effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.
Legal Proceedings

The information set forth under Note 8 of Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part I, Item 1 of this Report, is incorporated herein by reference. For an additional discussion of certain risks associated with legal proceedings, see “Risk Factors” immediately below.


Item 1A.
Risk Factors

Before deciding to purchase, hold or sell our common stock, you should carefully consider the risks described below in addition to the other information contained in this Report and in our other filings with the SEC, including our 2013 Annual Report and subsequent reports on Forms 10-Q and 8-K. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also affect our business. If any of these known or unknown risks or uncertainties actually occurs with material adverse effects on Broadcom, our business, financial condition, results of operations and/or liquidity could be seriously harmed. In that event, the market price for our Class A common stock will likely decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly.

Our quarterly net revenue and operating results have fluctuated significantly in the past and are likely to continue to vary from quarter to quarter. Variability in the nature of our operating results may be attributed to the factors identified throughout this “Risk Factors” section, many of which may be outside our control, including:

changes in economic conditions in the markets we address, including the continuing volatility in the technology sector and semiconductor industry;
our dependence on a few significant customers and/or design wins for a substantial portion of our revenue;
our exit or entry into various markets and our ability to align our resources to areas of strategic focus;
changes in customer product needs and market acceptance of our products;

37



seasonality in sales of consumer and enterprise products in which our products are incorporated;
timing, rescheduling or cancellation of significant customer orders and our ability, as well as the ability of our customers, to manage inventory;
competitive pressures and other factors such as the qualification, availability and pricing of competing products and technologies and the resulting effects on sales and pricing of our products;
goodwill and other purchased intangible impairment charges;
the impact of a significant natural disaster, such as an earthquake, severe weather, tsunami or other flooding, or a nuclear crisis, as well as interruptions or shortages in the supply of utilities such as water and electricity, in a key location such as our corporate headquarters or our Northern California facilities, both of which are located near major earthquake fault lines, in our Singapore distribution center or in a key location of one of our suppliers, foundries or customers;
the impact of enterprise system failures or network disruptions, the lack of system redundancies, and the potential failure of our disaster recovery planning to cover various unanticipated occurrences; and
the impact of tax examinations.

We depend on a few significant customers for a substantial portion of our revenue.

We derive a substantial portion of our revenue from sales to a relatively small number of customers. Sales to our five largest customers represented 44.2%, and 48.6% of our total net revenue in the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Sales to two significant customers represented 27.3% and 34.5% of our total net revenue in the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. We expect that our largest customers will continue to account for a substantial portion of our total net revenue for the foreseeable future. However, we cannot predict whether our decision to exit the cellular baseband business will negatively impact those relationships. The loss of any significant customer could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Also, as our significant customers become larger relative to our business and the industry, they may be able to leverage pricing pressure through the supply chain, vertical integration or other avenues, thereby adversely affecting our gross margins.

A significant portion of our revenue in any period may also depend on a single product design win with a large customer. As a result, the loss of any such key design win or any significant delay in the ramp of volume production of the customer’s products into which our product is designed could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. We may not be able to maintain sales to certain of our key customers or continue to secure key design wins for a variety of reasons, including:

agreements with our customers typically do not require them to purchase a minimum quantity of our products; and
our customers can stop incorporating our products into their own products with limited notice to us and suffer little or no penalty.

Additionally, in markets where we have a strong presence, our future growth will not necessarily be dependent on or correlate to our technical or design win success, but rather, may be dependent on (and may be constrained by) the growth rate of the overall market for the end product devices.

The loss of a key customer or design win, a reduction in sales to any key customer, a significant delay or negative development in our customers’ product development plans, or our inability to attract new significant customers or secure new key design wins could seriously impact our revenue and materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

We may fail to appropriately adjust our operations in response to changes in our strategy or market demand.

Through internal growth and acquisitions, we significantly modified the scope of our operations and workforce in recent years. In response to changes in industry and market conditions, we may from time to time strategically realign our resources. These circumstances could cause the need to implement restructuring actions and other cost saving measures. Our operations are characterized by a high percentage of costs that are fixed or difficult to reduce in the short term, such as research and development expenses related to our highly skilled workforce.

As a result of our decision to exit the cellular baseband business and better align our resources to areas of strategic focus, we approved a restructuring plan in the second quarter of 2014. The plan focuses primarily on workforce reductions and facility consolidations. We cannot provide assurance that our restructuring efforts will be successful, that associated cost savings from the cellular baseband business exit will be realized, that future operations will improve or that the completion of the restructuring will not disrupt our operations.

38



During other periods, our growth has placed a significant strain on our management personnel, systems and resources. To respond to such periods of increased demand, we would need to expand, train, manage and motivate our workforce, and to upgrade or enhance our existing IT systems. For example, in response to prior periods of growth we began upgrading our enterprise resource planning system and expect to continue to do so over the next twelve months. We may not be successful in implementing new systems, which could involve business disruptions, including impeding the shipment of our products. If we are unable to effectively manage expanding operations during growth periods, we may be unable to adjust our business quickly enough to meet competitive challenges or exploit potential market opportunities.

Any of these circumstances could materially and adversely affect our current or future business.

We face intense competition.

The semiconductor industry and the wired and wireless communications markets are intensely competitive. We expect competition to continue to increase as new markets develop, as industry standards become well known and as other competitors enter our business. We also expect to encounter further consolidation in the markets in which we compete.

Some of our competitors have longer operating histories and presences in key markets, greater name recognition, larger customer bases, and significantly greater financial, research and development, sales and marketing, manufacturing, distribution, technical and other resources than we do, and in some cases operate their own fabrication facilities. These competitors may be able to adapt more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements. They may also be able to devote greater resources to the promotion and sale of their products. We also face competition from newly established competitors, suppliers of products, and customers who choose to develop their own semiconductor solutions.

Existing or new competitors may develop technologies that more effectively address our markets with products that offer enhanced features and functionality, lower power requirements, lower cost or greater levels of integration. The trend of increasingly integrated SoCs and chipset solutions in particular could pose a risk to various lines of our business, as customers may opt for a solution that includes functionality that was previously sourced from us on a standalone basis, especially with respect to our Connectivity business.

We recently announced our intended exit from the cellular baseband business. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully grow or maintain our Connectivity business independent of the cellular baseband business.

Increased competition also has resulted in and is likely to continue to result in increased expenditures on research and development, a decline in average selling prices, reduced gross margins and loss of market share in certain markets. These factors in turn create increased pressure to consolidate. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to continue to compete successfully against current or new competitors. If we do not compete successfully, we may lose market share in our existing markets and our revenues may fail to increase or may decline.

We manufacture and sell complex products and may be unable to successfully develop and introduce new products.

We expect that a high percentage of our future sales will come from sales of new products. We sell products in markets that are characterized by rapid technological change, evolving industry standards, frequent new product introductions and sometimes, short product life cycles. The markets for some of these products are new to us and may be immature and/or unpredictable. These markets may not develop into profitable opportunities and we have in the past invested substantial resources in emerging technologies, including LTE technology, that did not achieve the market acceptance or commercial success that we had expected. As a result, it is difficult to anticipate our future revenue streams from, or the sustainability of, our new products.

Our industry is dynamic and we are required to devote significant resources to research and development to remain competitive. Such costs increase with the advancement of technologies and manufacturing in smaller geometry processes, which can adversely affect our operating margin. The development of new silicon devices is highly complex, and due to supply chain cross-dependencies and other issues, we may experience delays in completing the development, production and introduction of our new products. We may choose to discontinue one or more products or product development programs to dedicate more resources to other products. The discontinuation of an existing or planned product may adversely affect our relationship with one or more of our customers and/or could cause us to incur an impairment charge.

Our ability to successfully develop and deliver new products will depend on various factors, including our ability to:


39


effectively identify and capitalize upon opportunities in new markets;
timely complete and introduce new integrated products;
transition our semiconductor products to increasingly smaller line width geometries;
obtain sufficient foundry capacity (including at smaller geometry processes) and packaging materials;
license any desired third party technology or intellectual property rights; and
qualify and obtain industry interoperability certification of our products.

If we are not able to develop and introduce new products in a cost effective and timely manner, we will be unable to attract new customers or to retain our existing customers which would materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

We have experienced hardware and software defects and bugs associated with the introduction of our highly complex products. If any of our products contain defects or bugs, or have reliability, quality, security or compatibility problems, our reputation may be damaged and customers may be reluctant to buy our products. These problems could interrupt or delay sales and shipments of our products to customers. To alleviate these problems, we may have to divert our resources from other development efforts. In addition, these problems could result in claims against us by our customers or others, including possible claims for consequential damages and/or lost profits. As we transition to manufacturing our products in smaller geometry processes, such as 28 nanometers and below, these risks are enhanced.

We are exposed to risks associated with our international operations.

We currently obtain substantially all of our manufacturing, assembly and testing services from suppliers located outside the United States. Products shipped to international destinations, primarily in Asia, represented 95.4% and 96.8% of our product revenue in the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Substantially all of our products are shipped through our logistical facilities in Singapore. An increasing portion of our product sales is made through international distributors, which increases our exposure to the risks described below. In addition, we undertake various sales and marketing activities through regional offices in a number of countries. We intend to continue expanding our international business activities and to open other design and operational centers abroad.

International operations are subject to many inherent risks, including but not limited to:

political, social and economic instability;
exposure to different business practices and legal and compliance standards;
continuation of overseas conflicts and the risk of terrorist attacks and resulting heightened security;
the imposition of governmental controls and restrictions and unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
nationalization of business and blocking of cash flows;
logistical delays or disruptions;
changes in taxation and tariffs; and
difficulties in staffing and managing international operations.

Our international operations are subject to increasingly complex foreign and U.S. laws and regulations, including but not limited to anti-corruption laws, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the UK Bribery Act and equivalent laws in other jurisdictions, antitrust or competition laws, and data privacy laws, among others. Violations of these laws and regulations could result in fines and penalties, criminal sanctions against us, our officers, or our employees, prohibitions on the conduct of our business and on our ability to offer our products and services in one or more countries, and could also materially affect our reputation, our international expansion efforts, our ability to attract and retain employees, our business, and our operating results. Although we have implemented policies, procedures and training designed to ensure compliance with these laws and regulations, there can be no complete assurance that any individual employee, contractor, or agent will not violate our policies. Additionally, the costs of complying with these laws (including the costs of investigations, auditing and monitoring) could also adversely affect our current or future business.

Economic conditions in our primary overseas markets, particularly in Asia, may negatively impact the demand for our products abroad. Also, all of our international sales to date have been denominated in U.S. dollars. Accordingly, an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies could make our products less competitive in international markets or require us to assume the risk of denominating certain sales in foreign currencies. We anticipate that these factors will impact our business to a greater degree as we further expand our international business activities.

Our stock price is highly volatile.

The market price of our Class A common stock has fluctuated substantially in the past and is likely to continue to be

40


highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations. From January 1, 2012 through June 30, 2014 our Class A common stock has traded at prices as low as $23.25 and as high as $39.66 per share. Fluctuations have occurred and may continue to occur in response to various factors, many of which we cannot control.

In addition, the market prices of securities of semiconductor and other technology companies have been and remain volatile. This volatility has significantly affected the market prices of securities of many technology companies for reasons frequently unrelated to the operating performance of the specific companies. If our operating results do not meet the expectations of securities analysts or investors, who may derive their expectations by extrapolating data from recent historical operating results, the market price of our Class A common stock will likely decline. Accordingly, you may not be able to resell your shares of common stock at or above the price you paid. In the past, we, and other companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their securities, have been the subject of securities class action litigation.

Due to the nature of our compensation programs, most of our executive officers sell shares of our common stock periodically, often pursuant to trading plans established under Rule 10b5-1 of the Exchange Act. As a result, sales of shares by our executive officers may not be indicative of their respective opinions of Broadcom’s performance at the time of sale or of our potential future performance. Nonetheless, the market price of our stock may be affected by sales of shares by our executive officers.

Our operating results may be adversely impacted by worldwide economic uncertainties and specific conditions in the markets we address.

We operate primarily in the semiconductor industry, which is cyclical and subject to rapid change and evolving industry standards. From time to time, the semiconductor industry has experienced significant downturns characterized by decreases in product demand, excess customer inventories and accelerated erosion of prices. The semiconductor industry also periodically experiences increased demand and production capacity constraints, which may affect our ability to ship products. An increasing number of our products are being incorporated into consumer electronic products, which are subject to significant seasonality and fluctuations in demand. Economic volatility can cause extreme difficulties for our customers and vendors in accurately forecasting and planning future business activities. This unpredictability could cause our customers to reduce spending on our products and services, which would delay and lengthen sales cycles. Furthermore, during challenging economic times our customers and vendors may face challenges in gaining timely access to sufficient credit, which could impact their ability to make timely payments to us. As a result, we may experience growth patterns that are different than the demand for our customers' products, particularly during periods of high volatility.

We cannot predict the timing, strength or duration of any economic slowdown or recovery or the impact of such events on our customers, our vendors or us. The combination of our lengthy sales cycle coupled with challenging macroeconomic conditions and supply chain cross-dependencies could have a compound impact on our business. The impact of market volatility is not limited to revenue but may also affect our product gross margins and other financial metrics. Any downturn in the semiconductor industry may be severe and prolonged, and any failure of the industry or wired and wireless communications markets to fully recover from downturns could seriously impact our revenue and harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may be unable to attract, retain or motivate key personnel.

Our future success depends on our ability to attract, retain and motivate senior management and qualified technical personnel. Competition for these employees is intense. If we are unable to attract, retain and motivate such personnel in sufficient numbers and on a timely basis, we will experience difficulty in implementing our current business and product plans. In that event, we may be unable to successfully meet competitive challenges or to exploit potential market opportunities, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations. Our current and any future restructuring plans may adversely impact our ability to attract and retain key employees.

We may be required to defend against alleged infringement of intellectual property rights of others and/or may be unable to adequately protect or enforce our own intellectual property rights.

Companies in the semiconductor industry and the wired and wireless communications markets aggressively protect and pursue their intellectual property rights. From time to time, we receive notices from competitors and other operating companies, as well as notices from "non-practicing entities," or NPEs, that claim we have infringed upon, misappropriated or misused other parties’ proprietary rights. We may also be required to indemnify some customers and strategic partners under our agreements if a third party alleges or if a court finds that our products or activities have infringed upon, misappropriated or misused another party’s proprietary rights. We have received requests from certain customers and strategic partners to include

41


increasingly broad indemnification provisions in our agreements with them. Additionally, our products may contain technology provided to us by other parties such as contractors, suppliers or customers. We may have little or no ability to determine in advance whether such technology infringes the intellectual property rights of a third party. Our contractors, suppliers and licensors may not be required to indemnify us in the event that a claim of infringement is asserted against us, or they may be required to indemnify us only up to a maximum amount, above which we would be responsible for any further costs or damages.

Furthermore, our success and future revenue growth will depend, in part, on our ability to protect our intellectual property. It is possible that competitors or other unauthorized third parties may obtain, copy, use or disclose our technologies and processes, or confidential employee, customer or supplier data. Any of our existing or future patents may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. We engage in litigation to enforce or defend our intellectual property rights, protect our trade secrets, or determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others, including our customers. We also enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants and strategic partners and control access to and distribution of our technologies, documentation and other proprietary information. Despite these efforts, internal or external parties may attempt to copy, disclose, obtain or use our products, services or technology without our authorization. If we cannot adequately protect our technology, our competitors may be able to offer products similar to ours.

Intellectual property litigation can be expensive, time consuming and distracting to management. An adverse determination in any of these types of disputes could prevent us from manufacturing or selling some of our products or could prevent us from enforcing our intellectual property rights. Settlements can involve royalty or other payments that could reduce our profit margins and adversely affect our financial results. Additionally, identifying unauthorized use of our products and technologies is difficult and time consuming. The initiation of litigation may adversely affect our relationships and agreements with certain customers that have a stake in the outcome of the litigation proceedings.

We face risks associated with our acquisition strategy.

A key element of our business strategy involves expansion through the acquisition of businesses, assets, products or technologies. The expansion of our business through acquisitions allows us to complement our existing product offerings, expand our market coverage, increase our engineering workforce and/or enhance our technological capabilities. We may not be able to identify or consummate future acquisitions or realize the desired benefit from these acquisitions.

We face a number of challenges associated with our acquisition strategy that could disrupt our ongoing business and distract our management team, including:
 
lower revenue, gross margins and operating income than originally anticipated at the time of acquisition and other financial challenges;
delays in the timing and successful integration of an acquired company’s technologies, and/or launch of products;
the loss of key personnel;
challenges in obtaining necessary transition services; and
becoming subject to intellectual property or other litigation.

Acquisitions can result in increased debt or contingent liabilities. While we believe we will have the ability to service any additional debt we may potentially issue in connection with acquisitions, our ability to make principal and interest payments when due depends upon our future performance, which will be subject to general economic conditions, industry cycles, and business and other factors affecting our operations, including the other risk factors described in this section, many of which are beyond our control. Acquisitions can also result in adverse tax consequences, warranty or product liability exposure related to acquired assets, additional stock-based compensation expense, write up of acquired inventory to fair value, and the recording and later amortization of amounts related to certain purchased intangible assets, all of which can adversely affect our reported results on a GAAP basis. Furthermore, we have in the past and may in the future record goodwill and other purchased intangible assets in connection with an acquisition and incur impairment charges.

We are subject to order and shipment uncertainties.

It is difficult to accurately predict demand for our semiconductor products. We typically sell products pursuant to purchase orders rather than long-term purchase commitments. Customers can generally cancel, change or defer purchase orders on short notice without incurring a significant penalty. Our ability to accurately forecast customer demand is further impaired by delays inherent in our lengthy sales cycle. We operate in a dynamic industry and use significant resources to develop new products for existing and new markets. After we have developed a product, there is no guarantee that our customers will integrate our product into their equipment or devices and, ultimately, bring those equipment and devices incorporating our

42


product to market. In these situations, we may never produce or deliver a significant number of our products, even after incurring substantial development expenses. From the time a customer elects to integrate our solution into their product, it is typically six to 24 months before high volume production of that product commences. After volume production begins, we cannot be assured that the equipment or devices incorporating our product will gain market acceptance.

Our products are incorporated into complex devices and systems, creating supply chain cross-dependencies. Accordingly, supply chain disruptions affecting components of our customers’ devices and/or systems could negatively impact the demand for our products, even if the supply of our products is not directly affected.

Our product demand forecasts are based on multiple assumptions, each of which may introduce error into our estimates. In the event we overestimate customer demand, we may allocate resources to manufacturing products that we may not be able to sell. As a result, we could hold excess or obsolete inventory, which would reduce our profit margins and adversely affect our financial results. Conversely, if we underestimate customer demand or if insufficient manufacturing capacity is available, we could forego revenue opportunities and potentially lose market share and damage our customer relationships. Also, due to our industry’s use of “just-in-time” inventory management, any disruption in the supply chain could lead to more immediate shortages in product or component supply. Additionally, any enterprise system failures, including in connection with implementing new systems, could impact our ability to fulfill orders and interrupt other processes.

A portion of our inventory is maintained under hubbing and distribution arrangements whereby products are delivered to a customer or third party warehouse based upon the customer’s projected needs. Under these arrangements, we do not recognize product revenue until the customer reports that it has removed our product from the warehouse to incorporate into its end products. Our ability to effectively manage inventory levels may be impaired under such arrangements, which could increase expenses associated with insurance costs, excess and obsolete product inventory and negatively impact our cash flow.

Our business is subject to potential tax liabilities.

We are subject to income taxes in the United States and various foreign jurisdictions. The amount of income taxes we pay is subject to our interpretation and application of tax laws in jurisdictions in which we file. Changes in current or future laws or regulations, or the imposition of new or changed tax laws or regulations or new related interpretations by taxing authorities in the U.S. or foreign jurisdictions, could adversely affect our results of operations. We are subject to examinations and tax audits. There can be no assurance that the outcomes from these audits will not have an adverse effect on our net operating loss and research and development tax credit carryforwards, our financial position, or our operating results.

We depend on third parties to fabricate, assemble and test our products.

As a fabless semiconductor company, we do not own or operate fabrication, assembly or test facilities. As a result, we face competition for manufacturing capacity in the open market. We rely on third parties to manufacture, assemble and test substantially all of our semiconductor devices. Accordingly, we cannot directly control our product delivery schedules and quality assurance. This lack of control could result in product shortages or quality assurance problems. These issues could delay shipments of our products or increase our assembly or testing costs. In addition, the consolidation of foundry subcontractors, as well as the increasing capital intensity and complexity associated with fabrication in smaller process geometries has limited our diversity of suppliers and increased our risk of a “single point of failure.” Specifically, as we move to smaller geometries, we have become increasingly reliant on TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company) for the manufacture of product at and below 40 nanometers. The lack of diversity of suppliers could also drive increased wafer prices, adversely affect our results of operations, including our product gross margins.

We do not have long-term agreements with any of our direct or indirect suppliers, including our manufacturing, assembly or test subcontractors. We typically procure services from these suppliers on a per order basis. In the event our third-party foundry subcontractors experience a disruption or limitation of manufacturing, assembly or testing capacity, we may not be able to obtain alternative manufacturing, assembly and testing services in a timely manner, or at all. Furthermore, our foundries must have new manufacturing processes qualified if there is a disruption in an existing process, which could be time-consuming. We could experience significant delays in product shipments if we are required to find alternative manufacturers, assemblers or testers for our products. We are continuing to develop relationships with additional third-party subcontractors to assemble and test our products.

Because we rely on outside foundries and other third party suppliers, we face several significant risks in addition to those discussed above, including:


43


a lack of guaranteed supply of wafers and other components and potential higher wafer and component prices due to supply constraints;
the limited availability of, or potential delays in obtaining access to, key process technologies; and
the location of foundries and other suppliers in regions that are subject to earthquakes, tsunamis and other natural disasters.

The manufacture of integrated circuits is a highly complex and technologically demanding process. Our foundries have from time to time experienced lower than anticipated manufacturing yields. This often occurs during the production of new products or the installation and start-up of new process technologies. In addition, we are dependent on our foundry subcontractors to successfully transition to smaller geometry processes.

Our systems are subject to security breaches and other cybersecurity incidents.

We experience cyber attacks of varying degrees on a regular basis, and as a result, unauthorized parties have obtained, and may in the future obtain, access to our computer systems and networks. Such cyber attacks could result in the misappropriation of our proprietary information and technology or interrupt our business. The reliability and security of our information technology infrastructure and software and our ability to expand and continually update technologies in response to our changing needs is critical to our business. To the extent that any disruptions or security breaches result in significant loss or damage to our data, or inappropriate disclosure of significant proprietary information, it could cause damage to our reputation and affect our relationships with our customers and ultimately harm our business.

Government regulation may adversely affect our business.

The effects of regulation on our customers or the industries in which they operate may materially and adversely impact our business. For example, regulatory policies of the Federal Communications Commission that affect the ability of cable or satellite operators or telephone companies to offer certain services to their customers could impede sales of our products in the United States. We and our customers are also subject to various import and export laws and regulations that apply to the encryption or other features contained in some of our products. If we fail to continue to comply with these regulations, we may be unable to manufacture the affected products at foreign foundries or ship these products to certain customers, or we may incur penalties or fines.

As described above under the risk factor entitled "We are exposed to risks associated with our international operations," our business is also increasingly subject to complex foreign and U.S. laws and regulations, including but not limited to, anti-corruption laws, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the UK Bribery Act and equivalent laws in other jurisdictions, antitrust or competition laws, and data privacy laws, among others. Foreign governments may also impose tariffs, duties and other import restrictions on components that we obtain from non-domestic suppliers and may impose export restrictions on products that we sell internationally. These tariffs, duties or restrictions could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our product or manufacturing standards could also be impacted by new or revised environmental rules and regulations or other social initiatives. For instance, the SEC requires disclosures relating to the sourcing of certain minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries. Those rules, or similar rules that may be adopted in other jurisdictions, could adversely affect our costs, the availability of minerals used in our products and our relationships with customers and suppliers.

Our articles of incorporation and bylaws contain anti-takeover provisions.

Our articles of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting stock. For example, our Board of Directors may issue shares of Class B common stock in connection with certain acquisitions, which shares have superior voting rights entitling the holder to ten votes for each share held on matters that we submit to a shareholder vote (as compared to one vote per share in the case of our Class A common stock). Furthermore, our Board of Directors has the authority to fix the rights and preferences of shares of our preferred stock and to issue shares of common or preferred stock without a shareholder vote. These provisions, among others, may discourage certain types of transactions involving an actual or potential change in our control.

44



There can be no assurance that we will continue to declare cash dividends.

In January 2010, our Board of Directors adopted a dividend policy pursuant to which Broadcom would pay quarterly dividends on our common stock. In January 2011, 2012 and 2013 and again in 2014 our Board of Directors increased the quarterly dividend payment. We intend to continue to pay such dividends subject to capital availability and periodic determinations by our Board of Directors that cash dividends are in the best interest of our shareholders and are in compliance with all laws and agreements of Broadcom applicable to the declaration and payment of cash dividends.

Future dividends may be affected by, among other factors:

our views on potential future capital requirements for investments in acquisitions and the funding of our research and development;
use of cash to consummate various acquisition transactions;
stock repurchase programs;
changes in federal and state income tax laws or corporate laws; and
changes to our business model.

Our dividend payments may change from time to time, and we cannot provide assurance that we will continue to increase our dividend payment or declare dividends in any particular amounts or at all. A reduction in our dividend payments could have a negative effect on our stock price.

Our co-founders and their affiliates may strongly influence the outcome of matters that require the approval of our shareholders.

As of June 30, 2014 our co-founders, directors, executive officers and their respective affiliates beneficially owned 9.3% of our outstanding common stock and held 48.1% of the total voting power held by our shareholders. As a result, the voting power of these shareholders may strongly influence the outcome of matters that require the approval of our shareholders, including the election of our Board of Directors and certain significant corporate transactions. In particular, as of June 30, 2014 our two founders, Dr. Henry T. Nicholas III and Dr. Henry Samueli, beneficially owned a total of 8.4% of our outstanding common stock and held 47.7% of the total voting power held by our shareholders. Because of their significant voting stock ownership, we may not be able to engage in certain transactions, and our shareholders may not be able to effect certain actions or transactions, without the approval of one or both of these shareholders. In addition, repurchases of shares of our Class A common stock under our share repurchase program would result in an increase in the total voting power of our co-founders, directors, executive officers and their affiliates, as well as other continuing shareholders.

Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

In the three months ended June 30, 2014 we issued approximately 66,000 shares of Class A common stock upon conversion of a like number of shares of Class B common stock in connection with their disposition. Each share of Class B common stock is convertible at any time into one share of Class A common stock at the option of the holder. The offers and sales of those securities were effected without registration in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

In February 2010, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized an evergreen share repurchase program intended to offset dilution associated with our stock incentive plans. The maximum number of shares of our Class A common stock that may be repurchased in any one year under this program (including under an accelerated share repurchase or similar arrangement) is equal to the total number of shares issued pursuant to our equity awards in the previous year and the current year. This program does not have an expiration date and may be suspended at any time at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The program may be complemented by one or more additional share repurchase programs in the future.

The following table presents details of our various repurchases during the three months ended June 30, 2014:

45


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Period
 
Total Number of Shares Purchased
 
Average Price per Share
 
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans
 
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May yet be Purchased under the Plans
 
 
(In millions, except per share data)
April 2014
 
3.0

 
$
30.56

 
3.0

 
 
May 2014
 
3.2

 
31.00

 
3.2

 
 
June 2014
 

 

 

 
 
Total
 
6.2

 
$
30.79

 
6.2

 
N/A

Repurchases under our share repurchase programs were and are intended to be made in open market or privately negotiated transactions in compliance with Rule 10b-18 promulgated under the Exchange Act. Our share repurchase programs do not obligate us to acquire any particular amount of our stock and may be suspended at any time at our discretion.

Item 3.
Defaults upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable

Item 5.
Other Information

On June 2, 2014 we filed a Current Report on Form 8-K regarding a potential material impairment in connection with the planned exit from our cellular baseband business. See Note 10 of Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for updates to that Current Report and for further information.

On June 26, 2014, the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors approved a global restructuring plan that focuses on cost reductions and operating efficiencies, and better aligns our resources to areas of strategic focus. See Note 9 of Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.


46


Item 6.
Exhibits

(a)Exhibits. The following Exhibits are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference:
 
Exhibit
 
 
Number
 
Description
 
 
 
31.1
 
Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer, as required pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
31.2
 
Certifications of the Chief Financial Officer, as required pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
32
 
Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as required pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and furnished herewith pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238
 
 
 
101. INS
 
XBRL Instance Document
 
 
 
101. SCH
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
 
 
101. CAL
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
 
 
101. DEF
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
 
 
 
101. LAB
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
 
 
 
101. PRE
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

* A contract, compensatory plan or arrangement in which directors or executive officers are eligible to participate.

47


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
BROADCOM CORPORATION,
 
a California corporation
 
(Registrant)
 
 
 
/S/ ERIC K. BRANDT
 
Eric K. Brandt
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
(Principal Financial Officer)
 
 
 
/S/ ROBERT L. TIRVA
 
Robert L. Tirva
 
Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller
 
(Principal Accounting Officer)

July 22, 2014

48