UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 20-F

o	REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR
x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013
OR
o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period from      to
OR
o	SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of event requiring this shell company report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For the transition period from                       to                        

Commission File Number: 1-14852

GRUMA, S.A.B. de C.V.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

N/A

(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)

United Mexican States

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

Calzada del Valle, 407 Ote.

Colonia del Valle

San Pedro Garza García, Nuevo León

66220, México

(Address of principal executive offices)

Investor Relations

Calzada del Valle, 407 Ote.

Colonia del Valle

San Pedro Garza García, Nuevo León

66220, México

Tel: (52) 81 8399-3349

Facsimile: (52) 81 8399-3359

Email: ir@gruma.com

(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class:	Name of exchange on which registered:
Series B Common Shares, without par value	New York Stock Exchange*
American Depositary Shares, each representing four Series B Common Shares, without par value	New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:

None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:

432,749,079 Series B Common Shares, without par value

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

o Yes    No x

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

o Yes    No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes xo No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

N/A

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer x Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S. o GAAP x IFRS Other o

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

Item 17 o    Item 18 o

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o    No x

*         Not for trading but only in connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

INDEX

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS		3
PART I		3
ITEM 1	IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS	3
ITEM 2	OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE	3
ITEM 3	KEY INFORMATION	3
ITEM 4	INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY	16
ITEM 4A.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	34
ITEM 5	OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS	34
ITEM 6	DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES	53
ITEM 7	MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS	59
ITEM 8	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	61
ITEM 9	THE OFFER AND LISTING	63
ITEM 10	ADDITIONAL INFORMATION	65
ITEM 11	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	83
ITEM 12	DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES	86
PART II		86
ITEM 13	DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES	86
ITEM 14	MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS	87
ITEM 15	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	87
ITEM 16	RESERVED	87
ITEM 16A.	AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT	87
ITEM 16B.	CODE OF ETHICS	87
ITEM 16C.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES	88
ITEM 16D.	EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES	88
ITEM 16E.	PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS	88
ITEM 16F.	CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT	90
ITEM 16G.	CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	90
ITEM 16H.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE	91
PART III		91
ITEM 17	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	91
ITEM 18	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	91
ITEM 19	EXHIBITS	91

i

INTRODUCTION

Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. is a publicly held corporation (Sociedad Anónima Bursátil de Capital Variable) organized under the laws of the United Mexican States, or Mexico.

In this Annual Report on Form 20-F, references to “pesos” or “Ps.” are to Mexican pesos, references to “U.S. dollars,” “U.S.$,” “dollars” or “$” are to United States dollars and references to “bolivars” and “Bs.” are to the Venezuelan bolivar. “We,” “our,” “us,” “our company,” “GRUMA” and similar expressions refer to Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. and its consolidated subsidiaries, except when the reference is specifically to Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. (parent company only) or the context otherwise requires.

PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION

This Annual Report contains our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. The consolidated financial statements have been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers, S.C., an independent registered public accounting firm and were approved by our shareholders at the annual general shareholders’ meeting held on April 25, 2014.

We publish our financial statements in pesos and prepare our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”).

The financial statements of our entities are measured using the currency of the main economic environment where the entity operates (functional currency). The audited consolidated financial statements are presented in Mexican pesos, which corresponds to our presentation currency. Prior to the peso translation, the financial statements of foreign subsidiaries with functional currency from a hyperinflationary environment are adjusted for inflation in order to reflect changes in purchasing power of the local currency. Subsequently, assets, liabilities, equity, income, costs, and expenses are translated to the presentation currency at the closing rate at the date of the most recent balance sheet. To determine the existence of hyperinflation, we evaluate the qualitative characteristics of the economic environment, as well as the quantitative characteristics established by IFRS, including an accumulated inflation rate equal or higher than 100% in the past three years.

We ceased to consolidate the financial information of MONACA and DEMASECA (collectively referred to as the “Venezuelan Companies”) as of January 22, 2013 and derecognized the assets and liabilities of these companies from the consolidated balance sheet. For disclosure and presentation purposes, we consider these subsidiaries as a significant segment and therefore, applying the guidelines from IFRS 5 “Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations”, MONACA and DEMASECA are presented as discontinued operations. Therefore, the results and cash flows generated by these Venezuelan companies for the periods presented in our audited consolidated financial statements, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, and in this Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2010 were reported as discontinued operations. See Notes 28 and 30 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

MARKET SHARE

The information contained in this Annual Report regarding our market positions is based primarily on our own estimates and internal analysis and data obtained from AC Nielsen. Market position information for the United States is also based on data from Technomic. For Mexico, information is also based on data from Información Sistematizada de Canales y Mercados or “ISCAM”, Asociación Nacional de Tiendas de Autoservicio y Departamentales (National Supermarkets and Department Stores Association) or “ANTAD”, Asociación Nacional de Abarroteros Mayoristas (National Groceries Wholesalers Association) or “ANAM” and reports from industry chambers. For Europe, information is also based on data from Symphony IRI Group. While we believe our internal research and estimates are reliable, they have not been verified by any independent source and we cannot ensure their accuracy.

EXCHANGE RATE

This annual report contains translations of various peso amounts into U.S. dollars at specified rates solely for your convenience. You should not construe these translations as representations by us that the peso amounts actually represent the U.S. dollar amounts or could be converted into U.S. dollars at the rate indicated. Unless otherwise indicated, we have translated U.S. dollar amounts from pesos (i) as of December 31, 2013 at the exchange rate of Ps. 13.07 to U.S.$1.00, which was the rate established by Banco de México on December 27, 2013 and (ii) as of March 31, 2014 at the exchange rate of Ps.13.08 to U.S.$1.00, which was the rate established by Banco de México on March 27, 2014.

2

OTHER INFORMATION

Certain figures included in this Annual Report have been rounded for ease of presentation. Percentage figures included in this Annual Report are not all calculated on the basis of such rounded figures; some are calculated on the basis of such amounts prior to rounding. For this reason, percentage amounts in this Annual Report may vary from those obtained by performing the same calculations using the figures in our audited consolidated financial statements. Certain numerical figures shown as totals in some tables may not be an arithmetic aggregation of the figures that preceded them due to rounding.

All references to “tons” in this Annual Report refer to metric tons. One metric ton equals 2,204 pounds. Estimates of production capacity contained herein assume the operation of relevant facilities on the basis of 360 days a year, on three shifts, and assume only regular intervals for required maintenance.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, including the statements about our plans, strategies and prospects under “Item 4. Information on the Company” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.”  Some of these statements contain words such as “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “strategy,” “plans”, “budget”, “project” and other similar words. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations as reflected in or suggested by these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that these plans, intentions or expectations will be achieved. Actual results could differ materially from the forward-looking statements as a result of risks, uncertainties and other factors discussed in “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors,” “Item 4. Information on the Company,” “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”  These risks, uncertainties and factors include: general economic and business conditions, including changes in exchange rates, and conditions that affect the price and availability of corn, wheat and edible oils; potential changes in demand for our products; price and product competition; and other factors discussed herein.

PART I

ITEM 1Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors.

Not applicable.

ITEM 2Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable.

Not applicable.

ITEM 3Key Information.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following tables present our selected consolidated financial data as of and for each of the years indicated. The data as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are derived from and should be read together with our audited consolidated financial statements included herein and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.”

3

Pursuant to the transitional relief granted by the SEC in respect of the application of IFRS, historical financial data as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009 has been omitted.

In accordance with IFRS, we concluded that we lost control of our Venezuelan subsidiaries, MONACA and DEMASECA, on January 22, 2013.  As a result of such loss of control, we ceased the consolidation of the financial information of MONACA and DEMASECA starting January 22, 2013.

	2013			2012			2011			2010 (1)
	(thousands of Mexican Pesos, except per share amounts)
Income Statement Data:
Net sales	Ps.	54,106,305		Ps.	54,409,450		Ps.	48,488,146		Ps.	40,850,603
Cost of sales		(36,510,754	)		(37,849,274	)		(33,371,189	)		(27,516,845	)
Gross profit		17,595,551			16,560,176			15,116,957			13,333,758
Selling and administrative expenses		(12,572,458	)		(13,645,196	)		(12,485,762	)		(10,885,353	)
Other expense, net		(192,495	)		(100,970	)		(203,850	)		(492,206	)
Operating income		4,830,598			2,814,010			2,427,345			1,956,199
Comprehensive financing cost, net		(968,414	)		(826,694	)		(627,313	)		(975,243	)
Equity in earnings of associated companies		2,562			2,976			3,329			592,235
Gain from divestment in associated company		—			—			4,707,804			—
Income before income tax		3,864,746			1,990,292			6,511,165			1,573,191
Income tax expense		(198,448	)		(862,781	)		(1,618,271	)		(797,334	)
Net income from continuing operations		3,666,298			1,127,511			4,892,894			775,857
(Loss) income from discontinued operations		(356,329	)		576,248			922,928			(136,371	)
Consolidated net income		3,309,969			1,703,759			5,815,822			639,486
Attributable to:
Shareholders		3,163,133			1,115,338			5,270,762			431,779
Non-controlling interest		146,836			588,421			545,060			207,707
Per share data(2):
Basic and diluted earnings per share:
From continuing operations		7.75			1.21			8.16			0.92
From discontinued operations		(0.59	)		0.79			1.19			(0.15	)
From continuing and discontinued operations		7.16			2.00			9.35			0.77

		2013			2012			2011			2010
	(thousands of Mexican pesos, except per share amounts and operating data)
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
Property, plant and equipment, net	Ps.	17,904,972		Ps.	20,917,534		Ps.	20,515,633		Ps.	17,930,173
Total assets		42,608,640			49,460,402			44,542,618			38,927,394
Short-term debt(3)		3,275,897			8,018,763			1,633,207			2,192,871
Long-term debt(3)		13,096,443			11,852,708			11,472,110			15,852,538
Total liabilities		28,181,780			35,126,685			26,829,834			28,205,120
Common stock		5,363,595			5,668,079			6,972,425			6,972,425
Total equity(4)		14,426,860			14,333,717			17,712,784			10,722,274
Other Financial Information:
Capital expenditures		1,468,326			2,593,108			2,343,910			1,030,409
Depreciation and amortization		1,636,448			1,590,392			1,461,308			1,390,135
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities		6,679,431			1,806,136			1,751,314			3,291,138
Investing activities		(1,524,901	)		(3,455,629	)		6,779,129			(802,208	)
Financing activities		(5,112,396	)		1,817,675			(7,429,059	)		(4,234,431	)

4

(1)The financial information as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010 is derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and adjusted to conform to the current presentation adopted in the financial statements included in this Form 20-F. See Note 28 to the consolidated financial statements.

(2)Based upon the weighted average of outstanding shares of our common stock (in thousands), as follows:441,835 shares for the year ended December 31, 2013,  558,712 shares for the year ended December 31, 2012, 563,651 shares for the year ended December 31, 2011 and 563,651 shares for the year ended December 31, 2010. Each of our American Depositary Shares represents four Series B Common Shares.

(3)Short-term debt consists of bank loans, the current portion of long-term debt and debentures. Long-term debt consists of bank loans, our senior unsecured perpetual bonds and debentures.

(4)Total equity includes non-controlling interests as follows: Ps.1,454 million as of December 31, 2013, Ps.3,032 million as of December 31, 2012, Ps.4,282 million as of December 31, 2011 and Ps.3,778 million as of December 31, 2010.

	2013	2012	2011	2010	2009
	(thousands of tons)
Operating Data:
Sales volume:
Gruma Corporation (corn flour, tortillas and other)(1)	1,651	1,596	1,464	1,395	1,312
GIMSA (corn flour, and other)	1,852	1,983	1,959	1,890	1,874
Molinera de México (wheat flour)	579	583	564	530	508
Gruma Centroamérica (corn flour and other)	198	207	229	201	208
Production capacity:
Gruma Corporation (corn flour, tortillas and other)	2,406	2,499	2,482	2,314	2,096
GIMSA (corn flour, and other)(2)	3,046	2,965	2,965	2,965	2,964
Molinera de México (wheat flour)	920	860	837	811	894
Gruma Centroamérica (corn flour and other)	323	323	350	343	307
Number of employees	19,202	21,974	21,318	19,825	19,093

(1)Net of intercompany transactions.

(2)Includes 477 thousand tons of temporarily idled production capacity at December 31, 2013.

Dividends

Our ability to pay dividends may be limited by Mexican law, our estatutos sociales, or bylaws, and by financial covenants contained in some of our credit agreements. Because we are a holding company with no significant operations of our own, we have distributable profits to pay dividends to the extent that we receive dividends from our subsidiaries. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will pay dividends or of the amount of any such dividends. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness.”

Pursuant to Mexican law and our bylaws, the declaration, amount and payment of dividends are determined by a majority vote of the holders of the outstanding shares represented at a duly convened shareholders’ meeting. The amount of any future dividend would depend on, among other things, operating results, financial condition, cash requirements, losses for prior fiscal years, future prospects, the extent to which debt obligations impose restrictions on dividends and other factors deemed relevant by the board of directors and the shareholders.

In addition, under Mexican law, companies may only pay dividends:

·from earnings included in year-end financial statements that are approved by shareholders at a duly convened meeting;

·after any existing losses applicable to prior years have been made up or absorbed into shareholders’ equity;

5

·after at least 5% of net profits for the relevant fiscal year have been allocated to a legal reserve until the amount of the reserve equals 20% of a company’s paid-in capital stock; and

·after shareholders have approved the payment of the relevant dividends at a duly convened meeting.

Holders of our American Depositary Receipts, or ADRs, on the applicable record date are entitled to receive dividends declared on the shares represented by American Depositary Shares, or ADSs, evidenced by such ADRs. The depositary will fix a record date for the holders of ADRs in respect of each dividend distribution. We pay dividends in pesos and holders of ADSs will receive dividends in U.S. dollars (after conversion by the depositary from pesos, if not then restricted under applicable law) net of the fees, expenses, taxes and governmental charges payable by holders under the laws of Mexico and the terms of the deposit agreement.

The ability of our subsidiaries to make distributions to us is limited by the laws of each country in which they were incorporated and by their constitutive documents. For example, in the case of Gruma Corporation, our principal U.S. subsidiary, its ability to pay dividends in cash is prohibited upon the occurrence of any default or event of default under its principal credit agreements. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness.”

During 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009 we did not pay any dividends to shareholders.

Exchange Rate Information

Mexico has had a free market for foreign exchange since 1994, when the government suspended intervention by the Banco de México, and allowed the peso to float freely against the U.S. dollar. From the beginning of 2004 until August 2008, the Mexican peso was relatively stable, ranging from Ps.9.92 to Ps.11.63. Between October 1, 2008 and March 2, 2009, the Mexican peso depreciated in value from Ps.10.97 to Ps.15.40. From March 2009 to the end of May 2011, the Mexican peso appreciated in value from Ps.15.40 to Ps.11.58.  From June 2011 to June 1, 2012, the Mexican peso depreciated in value from 11.58 to 14.37. From June 1, 2012 to May 8, 2013 the Mexican peso appreciated in value from Ps.14.37 to Ps.11.98. From May 8, 2013 to February 3, 2014 the Mexican peso depreciated in value from Ps.11.98 to Ps.13.54. There can be no assurance that the government will maintain its current policies with regard to the peso or that the peso will not depreciate or appreciate in the future. See “Item 3. Key Information —Risk Factors—Risks Related to Mexico—Devaluations of the Mexican Peso May Affect our Financial Performance.”

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high, low, average and period-end noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in pesos published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, expressed in pesos per U.S. dollar.

	Noon Buying Rate (Ps. Per U.S.$)
Year	High (1)	Low (1)	Average (2)	Period End
2009	15.4060	12.6318	13.4970	13.0576
2010	13.1940	12.1556	12.6222	12.3825
2011	14.2542	11.5050	12.4270	13.9510
2012	14.3650	12.6250	13.1539	12.9635
2013	13.4330	11.9760	12.7584	13.0980
October 2013	13.2465	12.7665	12.9915	12.9995
November 2013	13.2430	12.8710	13.0597	13.1110
December 2013	13.2165	12.8505	13.0099	13.0980
January 2014	13.4560	12.9965	13.2220	13.3585
February 2014	13.5090	13.2035	13.2928	13.2255
March 2014	13.3315	13.0560	13.1929	13.0560

(1)Rates shown are the actual low and high, on a day-by-day basis for each period.

(2)Average of month-end rates.

On April 21, 2014, the noon buying rate for pesos was Ps.13.04 to U.S.$1.00.

6

RISK FACTORS

Risks Related to Our Company

Fluctuations in the Cost and Availability of Corn, Wheat and Wheat Flour May Affect Our Financial Performance

Our financial performance may be affected by the price and availability of corn, wheat and wheat flour as each of these raw materials represented 38%, 9% and 7%, respectively, of our cost of sales in 2013. Mexican and world markets have experienced periods of either over-supply or shortage of corn and wheat as a result of different factors such as weather conditions, some of which have caused adverse effects on our results of operations. Additionally, because of this volatility and price variations, we may not always be able to pass along our increased costs to our customers in the form of price increases. We cannot always predict whether or when shortages or over-supply of corn and wheat will occur. In addition, future Mexican or other countries’ governmental actions could affect the price and availability of corn and wheat. Any adverse developments in domestic and international corn and wheat markets could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

To manage these price risks, we regularly monitor our risk tolerance and evaluate the possibility of using derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to commodity prices. We generally hedge against fluctuations in the costs of corn and wheat, in particular at our U.S. operations, using futures and options contracts and fixed price supply contracts according to the Company’s risk management policy, but remain exposed to losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties to the financial instruments or the supply contracts. In addition, if corn or wheat prices decrease below the levels specified in our various hedging agreements, we would lose the value of a decline in these prices.

Our Current or Future Indebtedness could Adversely Affect Our Business and, Consequently, Our Ability to Pay Interest and Repay Our Indebtedness

Our level of short and long term indebtedness could increase our vulnerability to adverse general economic and industry conditions, including increases in interest rates, increases in prices of raw materials, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and market volatility. Our ability to make scheduled payments on and refinance our indebtedness when due depends on, and is subject to, several factors, including our financial and operating performance, which is subject to prevailing economic and financial conditions, business and other factors, the availability of financing in the Mexican and international banking and capital markets, and our ability to sell assets and implement operating improvements. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness.”

We May be Adversely Affected by Increases in Interest Rates

Interest rate risk exists primarily with respect to our floating-rate peso denominated debt, which generally bears interest based on the Mexican equilibrium interbank interest rate, which we refer to as the “TIIE.” In addition, we have additional interest rate risk with respect to floating-rate dollar-denominated debt, which generally bears interest based on the London interbank offered rate, which we refer to as “LIBOR.” We have significant exposure to interest rate fluctuations due to our floating-rate peso and dollar-denominated debt. As a result, if the TIIE or LIBOR rates increase significantly, our ability to service our debt may be adversely affected.

Downgrades of Our Debt May Increase Our Financing Costs or Otherwise Adversely Affect Us or Our Stock Price

Our long-term corporate credit rating and our senior unsecured perpetual bond are rated “BB+” by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (“Standard & Poor’s”). Our Foreign Currency Long-Term Issuer Default Rating and our Local Currency Long-Term Issuer Default Rating are rated “BB+” by Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”). Our U.S.$300 million perpetual bond is rated “BB+” by Fitch.

If our financial condition deteriorates, we may experience future declines in our credit ratings, with attendant consequences. Our access to external sources of financing, as well as the cost of that financing, could be adversely affected by a deterioration of our long-term debt ratings. A downgrade in our credit ratings could increase the cost of and/or limit the availability of financing, which may make it more difficult for us to raise capital when necessary. If we cannot obtain adequate capital on favorable terms or at all, our business, operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected.

7

We Expect to Pay Interest and Principal on Our Debt with Cash Generated mainly in Dollars or Pesos, as Needed, But Cannot Assure You That We Will Generate Sufficient Cash Flow in the Relevant Currency at the Required Times From Our Operations

We had approximately 64.9% of our outstanding debt denominated in dollars, 34.5% in Mexican pesos and 0.6% in other currencies as of December 31, 2013. We may not generate sufficient cash in the relevant currency from our operations to service the entire amount of our debt in such currency. A devaluation of certain currencies or a change in our business could adversely affect our ability to service our debt.

Increases in the Cost of Energy Could Affect Our Profitability

We use a significant amount of electricity, natural gas and other energy sources to operate our corn and wheat flour mills and processing ovens for the manufacture of tortillas and related products at our facilities. These energy costs represented approximately 4% of our cost of sales in 2013. In addition, considerable amounts of diesel fuel are used in connection with the distribution of our products. The cost of energy sources may fluctuate widely due to economic and political conditions, government policy and regulation, war, weather conditions or other unforeseen circumstances. An increase in the price of fuel and other energy sources would increase our operating costs and, therefore, could affect our profitability.

The Inadvertent Presence of Genetically Modified Corn Not Approved for Human Consumption in Our Products May Have a Negative Impact on Our Results of Operations

As we do not grow our own corn, we are required to buy it from various producers in the United States, Mexico and elsewhere.  Although we only buy corn from farmers and grain elevators who agree to supply us with approved varieties of corn and we have developed a protocol in all our operations to test and monitor our corn for certain strains of bacteria and chemicals that have not been approved for human consumption, we may unwittingly buy genetically modified corn that is not approved for human consumption, and use such raw materials in the manufacture of our products. This may result in costly recalls, subject us to lawsuits, and may have a negative impact on our results of operations.

In the past, various allegations have been made, mostly in the United States and the European Union, that genetically modified foods are unsafe for human consumption, pose risks of damage to the environment and create legal, social and ethical dilemmas. Some countries, particularly in the European Union, as well as Australia and some countries in Asia, have instituted a partial limitation on the import of grain produced from genetically modified seeds. Some countries have imposed labeling requirements and traceability obligations on genetically modified agricultural and food products, which may affect the acceptance of these products. The movement for GMO labeling in the United States has gathered momentum over the last several years.  While ballot initiatives have failed, several states, such as Connecticut and Maine, have passed qualified GMO labeling bills that will impose labeling requirements on food products containing genetically modified organisms if several other states pass similar laws.  Vermont recently passed the first non-qualified GMO labeling bill, which, if signed by the Vermont Governor, will impose GMO labeling requirements in 2015. If approved, these requirements may affect the acceptance of these products in such states. To the extent that we may unknowingly buy or may be perceived to be a seller of products manufactured with genetically modified grains not approved for human consumption, this may have a significant negative impact on our financial condition and results of operation.

Regulatory Developments May Adversely Affect Our Business

We are subject to regulation in each of the territories in which we operate. The principal areas in which we are subject to regulation are health, environmental, labor, taxation and antitrust. The adoption of new laws or regulations in the countries in which we operate may increase our operating costs or impose restrictions on our operations which, in turn, may adversely affect our financial condition, business and results of operations. Further changes in current regulations may result in an increase in compliance costs, which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation.”

Economic and Legal Risks Associated with a Global Business May Affect Our International Operations

We conduct our business in many countries and anticipate that revenues from our international operations will account for a significant portion of our future revenues. There are risks inherent in conducting our business internationally, including:

·general political and economic instability in international markets;

·limitations in the repatriation, nationalization or governmental seizure of our assets, including cash;

·direct or indirect expropriation of our international assets;

8

·varying prices and availability of corn, wheat and wheat flour and the cost and practicality of hedging such fluctuations under current market conditions;

·different liability standards and legal systems;

·developments in the international credit markets, which could affect capital availability or cost, and could restrict our ability to obtain financing or refinance our existing indebtedness at favorable terms, if at all; and

·intellectual property laws of countries that do not protect our international rights to the same extent as the laws of Mexico.

In recent years, we have expanded our operations to Ukraine, Russia and Turkey. Our presence in these and other markets could present us with new and unanticipated operational challenges. For example, we may encounter labor restrictions or shortages and currency conversion obstacles, or be required to comply with stringent local governmental and environmental regulations. Any of these factors could increase our operating expenses and decrease our profitability.

Our Business May Be Adversely Impacted By Risks Related to Our Derivatives Trading Activities

From time to time, we enter into commodities, currency and other derivative transactions, pursuant to our risk management policy, that cover varying periods of time and have varying pricing provisions. We may incur unrealized losses in connection with potential changes in the value of our derivative instruments as a result of changes in economic conditions, investor sentiment, monetary and fiscal policies, the liquidity of global markets, international and regional political events, and acts of war or terrorism. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources,” and “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—Foreign Exchange Rate Risk.”

We Cannot Predict the Impact that Changing Climate Conditions, Including Legal, Regulatory and Social Responses Thereto, May Have on Our Business

Various scientists, environmentalists, international organizations, regulators and other commentators believe that global climate change has added, and will continue to add, to the unpredictability, frequency and severity of natural disasters (including, but not limited to droughts, hurricanes, tornadoes, freezes, other storms and fires) in certain parts of the world. In response to this belief, a number of legal and regulatory measures as well as social initiatives have been introduced in an effort to reduce greenhouse gas and other carbon emissions which some believe may be chief contributors to global climate change. We cannot predict the impact that changing climate conditions, if any, will have on our results of operations or our financial condition. Moreover, we cannot predict how legal, regulatory and social responses to concerns about global climate change will impact our business in the future.

Our Business and Operations May Be Adversely Affected by Global Economic Conditions

The global macroeconomic environment has not fully recovered from the downturn commencing in 2008.  Subsequent years were characterized by instability in the financial markets and the threat of a continued global economic downturn, primarily as a result of the ongoing sovereign debt crisis and general economic outlook of the Eurozone, the high degree of unemployment in certain countries and the level of public debt in the U.S. and certain European countries.  Those developments adversely affected the economy in the United States, Europe and many other parts of the world, including Mexico, and had significant consequences worldwide, including unprecedented volatility, significant lack of liquidity, loss of confidence in the financial markets, disruptions in the credit sector, reduced business activity, rising unemployment, decline in interest rates and erosion of consumer confidence. It is uncertain how long the effects of this global macroeconomic instability will continue and how much of an impact it will have on the global economy in general, or the economies in which we operate in particular, and whether slowing economic growth in any such countries could result in our customers and consumers reducing their spending. As a result, we may need to lower the prices of certain of our products and services in order to maintain their attractiveness, which could lead to reduced turnover and profit or a decline in demand for our products. Any such development could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition and lead to a drop in the trading price of our shares.

Our Financial Information Prepared under IFRS May Not Be Comparable to Our Financial Information Prepared Under Mexican FRS

We adopted IFRS as of January 1, 2011 and prepared our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB. IFRS differs in certain significant respects from Mexican FRS and U.S. GAAP.

9

As a result of the adoption of IFRS, our consolidated financial information presented under IFRS for fiscal years 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 may not be comparable to our financial information for previous periods prepared under Mexican FRS available in the market.

Our Financial Information Presented in Previous Filings May Not Be Comparable because of the Deconsolidation of Our Venezuelan Operations

We ceased to consolidate the financial information of MONACA and DEMASECA (the Venezuelan Companies) as of January 22, 2013, therefore, the results and cash flows generated by such Venezuelan companies for the periods presented in our audited consolidated financial statements, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are reported as discontinued operations. Our audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010 presented our Venezuelan operations on a consolidated basis and are not comparable to the audited financial statements for fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011 included in this annual report.

Our financial information for the year ended December 31, 2010 included in this Form 20-F is derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and adjusted to conform to the current presentation adopted in the financial statements included in this Form 20-F. See Note 28 to the consolidated financial statements.

Risks Related to Mexico

Our Results of Operations Could Be Affected by Economic and Social Conditions in Mexico

We are a Mexican company with 46% of our consolidated assets located in Mexico and 39% of our consolidated net sales derived from our Mexican operations as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013. As a result, Mexican economic conditions could impact our results of operations.

In the past, Mexico has experienced exchange rate instability and devaluation as well as high levels of inflation, domestic interest rates, unemployment, negative economic growth and reduced consumer purchasing power. These events resulted in limited liquidity for the Mexican government and local corporations. Crime rates and civil and political unrest in Mexico and around the world could also negatively impact the Mexican economy. See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Developments in Other Countries Could Adversely Affect the Mexican Economy, the Market Value of our Securities and Our Results of Operations.”

Mexico has experienced periods of slow growth since 2001, primarily as a result of the downturn in the U.S. economy. The Mexican economy grew by 1.5% in 2008 but contracted by 6.1% in 2009. In 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013, the Mexican economy grew by 5.5%, 3.9%, 3.9% and 1.1%, respectively.

Developments and trends in the world economy affecting Mexico may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The Mexican economy is tightly connected to the U.S. economy through international trade (approximately 79% of Mexican exports were directed to the United States in 2013), international remittances (billions of dollars from Mexican workers in the United States are the country’s second-largest source of foreign exchange), foreign direct investment (approximately 32% of Mexican foreign direct investment came from U.S.-based investors in 2013), and financial markets (the U.S. and Mexican financial systems are highly integrated). As the U.S. economy contracts, U.S. citizens consume fewer Mexican imports, Mexican workers in the United States send less money to Mexico, U.S. firms with businesses in Mexico make fewer investments, U.S.-owned banks in Mexico make fewer loans, and the quality of U.S. financial assets held in Mexico deteriorates. Moreover, a collapse in confidence in the U.S. economy may spread to other economies closely connected to it, including Mexico’s. The result may be a potentially deep and protracted recession in Mexico. If the Mexican economy falls into a deep and protracted recession, or if inflation and interest rates increase, consumer purchasing power may decrease and, as a result, demand for our products may decrease. In addition, a recession could affect our operations to the extent we are unable to reduce our costs and expenses in response to falling demand.

Our Business Operations Could Be Affected by Government Policies in Mexico

The Mexican government has exerted, and continues to exert, significant influence over the Mexican economy. Mexican governmental actions concerning the economy could have a significant effect on Mexican private sector entities, as well as on market conditions, prices and returns on securities of Mexican issuers, including our securities. Governmental policies have negatively affected our sales of corn flour in the past and may continue to do so in the future.

10

Mexico held Presidential and Congressional elections on July 1, 2012, in which Enrique Peña Nieto, of political party Partido Revolucionario Institucional, or PRI, was elected. Following these elections, the Mexican Congress continues to be divided, as no political party in Mexico holds an absolute majority in the Senate or House of Representatives. The lack of a majority party in the legislature, the lack of alignment between the legislature and the President and any changes that result from the recent Presidential and Congressional elections could result in political uncertainty or deadlock and prevent the timely implementation of political and economic reforms, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on Mexican economic policy and on our business, financial conditions and results of operations.

The Mexican government supports the commercialization of corn for Mexican corn growers through the Agricultural Incentives and Trade Services Agency (Apoyos y Servicios a la Comercialización Agropecuaria, or ASERCA). To the extent that this or other similar programs are cancelled or modified by the Mexican government, we may be required to incur additional costs in purchasing corn for our operations, and therefore we may need to increase the prices of our products to reflect such additional costs. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation.”

In 2008, the Mexican government created a program to support the corn flour industry (Programa de Apoyo a la Industria de la Harina de Maíz or PROHARINA). This program aimed to mitigate the impact of the rise in international corn prices through price supports designed to aid the consumer and provided through the corn flour industry. However, the Mexican government cancelled the PROHARINA program in December 2009. As a result of the cancellation of this program by the Mexican government in December of 2009, we were required to increase the prices of our products to reflect such additional costs. There can be no assurance that we will maintain our eligibility for other programs similar to PROHARINA that may be implemented, or that the Mexican government will not institute price controls or other actions on the products we sell, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

The level of environmental regulations and enforcement in Mexico has increased in recent years. We expect the trend toward greater environmental regulation and enforcement to continue and to be accelerated as a result of international agreements between Mexico and the United States. The promulgation of new and more stringent environmental regulations or higher levels of enforcement could adversely affect our business condition and results of operations.

Devaluations of the Mexican Peso May Affect our Financial Performance

Because we have significant international operations generating revenue in different currencies (mainly in U.S. dollars) and debt denominated in various currencies, we remain exposed to foreign exchange risks that could affect our ability to meet our obligations and result in foreign exchange losses. We posted a net foreign exchange gain of Ps.437 million in 2010, a gain of Ps.41 million in 2011, a loss of Ps.82 million in 2012 and a gain of Ps.56 million in 2013. Major devaluation or depreciation of the Mexican peso may limit our ability to transfer or to convert such currency into U.S. dollars for the purpose of making timely payments of interest and principal on our indebtedness. The Mexican government does not currently restrict, and for many years has not restricted, the right or ability of Mexican or foreign persons or entities to convert pesos into U.S. dollars or to transfer other currencies out of Mexico. The government could, however, institute restrictive exchange rate policies in the future.

High Levels of Inflation and High Interest Rates in Mexico Could Adversely Affect the Business Climate in Mexico and our Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Mexico has experienced high levels of inflation in the past. The annual rate of inflation, as measured by changes in the National Consumer Price Index was 4.40% for 2010, 3.82% for 2011, 3.57% for 2012 and 3.97% for 2013.  From January through March 2014, the inflation rate was 1.43%.  On April 15, 2014, the 28-day CETES rate was 3.22%.  While a substantial part of our debt is dollar-denominated at this time, high interest rates in Mexico may adversely affect the business climate in Mexico generally and our financing costs in the future and thus our financial condition and results of operations.

Developments in Other Countries Could Adversely Affect the Mexican Economy, the Market Value of Our Securities and Our Results of Operations

The Mexican economy may be, to varying degrees, affected by economic and market conditions in other countries.  Although economic conditions in other countries may differ significantly from economic conditions in Mexico, investors’ reactions to adverse developments in other countries may have an adverse effect on the market value of securities of Mexican issuers.  In recent years, economic conditions in Mexico have become increasingly correlated to economic conditions in the United States.  Accordingly, the slow recovery of the economy in the United States, and the uncertainty of the impact it could have on the general economic conditions in Mexico and the United States could have a significant adverse effect on our businesses and results of operations.  See “Item 3.  Key Information—Risk Factors—Our Results of Operations Could Be Affected by Economic Conditions in Mexico,” and “Item 3.  Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Related to the United States—Unfavorable General Economic Conditions in the United States

11

Could Negatively Impact Our Financial Performance.” In addition, economic crises in the United States as well as in Asia, Russia, Brazil, Argentina and other emerging market countries have adversely affected the Mexican economy in the past.

Our financial performance may also be significantly affected by general economic, political and social conditions in the emerging markets where we operate, particularly Mexico, Venezuela, Eastern Europe and Asia.  Many countries in Latin America, including Mexico and Venezuela, have suffered significant economic, political and social crises in the past, and these events may occur again in the future.  See also “Item 3.  Key Information —Risks Related to Venezuela— We have Deconsolidated our Interest in the Venezuelan Companies which are currently Involved in Expropriation and Arbitration Proceedings.” Instability in Latin America has been caused by many different factors, including:

·Significant governmental influence over local economies;

·Substantial fluctuations in economic growth;

·High levels of inflation;

·Changes in currency values;

·Exchange controls or restrictions on expatriation of earnings;

·High domestic interest rates;

·Wage and price controls;

·Changes in governmental, economic or tax policies;

·Imposition of trade barriers;

·Unexpected changes in regulation; and

·Overall political, social and economic instability.

Adverse economic, political and social conditions in Latin America may create uncertainty regarding our operating environment, which could have a material adverse effect on our company.

We cannot assure you that the events in other emerging market countries, in the United States, Europe, or elsewhere will not adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

You May Be Unable to Enforce Judgments Against Us in Mexican Courts

We are a Mexican publicly held corporation (Sociedad Anónima Bursátil de Capital Variable).  Most of our directors and executive officers are residents of Mexico, and a significant portion of the assets of our directors and executive officers, and a significant portion of our assets, are located in Mexico.  You may experience difficulty in effecting service of process upon our company or our directors and executive officers in the United States, or, more generally, outside of Mexico and in enforcing civil judgments of non-Mexican courts in Mexico, including judgments predicated on civil liability under U.S. federal securities laws, against us, or our directors and executive officers.  We have been advised by our General Counsel that there is doubt as to the enforceability of original actions in Mexican courts of liabilities predicated solely on the U.S. federal securities laws.

Risks Related to Venezuela

We have Deconsolidated our Interests in the Venezuelan Companies which are Currently Involved in Expropriation and Arbitration Proceedings

On May 12, 2010, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (the “Republic”) published in the Official Gazette of Venezuela decree number 7,394 (the “Expropriation Decree”), which announced the forced acquisition of all goods, movables, and real estate of MONACA.  The Republic has expressed to GRUMA’s representatives that the Expropriation Decree extends to DEMASECA.

12

As stated in the Expropriation Decree and in accordance with the Venezuelan Expropriation Law (the “Expropriation Law”), the transfer of legal ownership can occur either through an “Amicable Administrative Arrangement” or a “Judicial Order”.  Neither method of transfer of titles has been completed.  Therefore, as of this date, no formal transfer of title of the assets covered by the Expropriation Decree has taken place.

GRUMA’s interests in MONACA and DEMASECA are held through two Spanish companies Valores Mundiales, S.L. (“Valores Mundiales”) and Consorcio Andino, S.L. (“Consorcio Andino”).  In 2010, Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino (collectively, the “Investors”) commenced negotiations with the Republic with the intention of reaching an amicable settlement.  Through Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino, GRUMA participated in these negotiations with a view to (1) continuing its presence in Venezuela by potentially entering into a joint venture with the Venezuelan government; and/or (ii) seeking adequate compensation for the assets subject to expropriation.

The Republic and the Kingdom of Spain are parties to a Treaty on Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments dated November 2, 1995 (the “Investment Treaty”), under which the Investors may settle investment disputes by means of arbitration before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”).  On November 9, 2011, the Investors, MONACA, and DEMASECA validly provided formal notice to the Republic that an investment dispute had arisen as a consequence of the Expropriation Decree and related measures adopted by the Republic.  In that notification, the Investors, MONACA, and DEMASECA also agreed to submit the dispute to ICSID arbitration if the parties were unable to reach an amicable agreement.

On January 22, 2013, the Venezuelan Government issued a resolution providing the right to take control over the operations of, MONACA and DEMASECA. As a result we concluded that we lost control of our Venezuelan subsidiaries, MONACA and DEMASECA, on January 22, 2013, in accordance with IFRS.  As a result of such loss of control, we ceased the consolidation of the financial information of MONACA and DEMASECA starting January 22, 2013 and reported any effects retroactively.

Following the notice of the investment dispute on November 9, 2011, on May 10, 2013, VALORES and CONSORCIO (the “Claimants”) commenced an arbitration proceeding against the Republic before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”). The proceeding is currently pending. The tribunal that presides over this arbitration proceeding was constituted in January 2014. In this arbitration proceeding, Claimants assert that the Expropriation Decree and related measures are in breach of certain provisions of the Treaty. Under the provisions of the Treaty, the Claimants have not yet made a claim for compensation resulting from expropriation, but have made a claim for damages resulting from the Republic’s actions in respect of the property owned by the Claimants.

While negotiations with the government have taken place and may again take place from time to time, the Company cannot assure that such negotiations will be successful or will result in the Investors receiving adequate compensation, if any, for their investments subject to the Expropriation Decree.  Additionally, the Company cannot predict the results of any arbitral proceeding, or the ramifications that costly and prolonged legal disputes could have on its results of operations or financial position, or the likelihood of collecting a successful arbitration award.  The Company and its subsidiaries reserve and intend to continue to reserve the right to seek full compensation for any and all expropriated assets and investments under applicable law, including investment treaties and customary international law. See “Item 8—Legal Proceedings—Venezuela—Expropriation Proceedings by the Venezuelan Government.” We do not have insurance for the risk of expropriation.

As disclosed in Note 28 to our audited consolidated financial statements, our income (loss) from our Venezuelan operations was Ps.923 million, Ps.576 million and (Ps.356 million) for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively.

Our interest in the total net assets of Venezuelan operations was Ps.3,109 million at January 22, 2013 and was accounted for as “Available-for-sale financial asset”.   Additionally, at December 31, 2013 certain subsidiaries of GRUMA have accounts receivable with the Venezuelan operations amounting Ps.1,138 million.

Venezuela Presents Significant Economic Uncertainty and Political Risks

In recent years, political and social instability has prevailed in Venezuela. This unrest presents a risk to our discontinued operations in Venezuela which cannot be controlled or accurately measured or estimated.

Venezuelan authorities have imposed foreign exchange and price controls that apply to products such as corn flour and wheat flour, which have limited the ability of MONACA and DEMASECA to increase prices in order to compensate for higher costs in raw materials and to convert bolivars into other currencies and transfer funds out of Venezuela.  Pursuant to the foreign exchange controls, the purchase and sale of foreign currency is required to be made at an official rate of exchange, as determined by the Venezuelan government (the “Official Rate”).  In addition, U.S. dollars may be acquired in order to settle certain U.S. dollar-denominated debt incurred pursuant to imports and royalty agreements, and for payment of dividends, capital gains, interest payments

13

or private debt only after proper submission and approval by the Foreign Exchange Administration Board (CADIVI).  We continue to make appropriate submissions to CADIVI.  We expect to be in a position to meet our foreign currency-denominated obligations; however, as long as the system of exchange controls remains in effect, there is no assurance that we will be able to secure the required approvals from CADIVI to have sufficient foreign currency for this purpose.

Risks Related to the United States

Unfavorable General Economic Conditions in the United States Could Negatively Impact Our Financial Performance

Net sales in the U.S. constituted 45% of our total sales in 2013.  Unfavorable general economic conditions in the United States could negatively affect the affordability of and consumer demand for some of our products.  Under difficult economic conditions, customers and consumers may seek to forego purchases of our products or, if available, shift to lower-priced products offered by other companies.  Softer customer and consumer demand for our products in the United States or in other major markets could reduce our profitability and could negatively affect our financial performance.

Additionally, as the retail grocery trade continues to consolidate and our retail customers grow larger, they could demand lower pricing and increased promotional programs.  Also, our dependence on sales to certain retail and food service customers could increase.  There is a risk that we will not be able to maintain our U.S. profit margin in this environment.

Demand for our products in Mexico may also be disproportionately affected by the performance of the United States economy.  See also “Item 3.  Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Related to Mexico—Our Results of Operations Could Be Affected by Economic Conditions in Mexico.”

Risks Related to Our Controlling Shareholders and Capital Structure

Holders of ADSs May Not Be Able to Vote at our Shareholders’ Meetings

Our shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange in the form of ADSs.  There can be no assurance that holders of our shares through ADSs will receive notices of shareholder meetings from our ADS depositary with sufficient time to enable such holders to return voting instructions to our ADS depositary in a timely manner.  Under certain circumstances, a person designated by us may receive a proxy to vote the shares underlying the ADSs at our discretion at a shareholder meeting.

Holders of ADSs Are Not Entitled to Attend Shareholder Meetings, and They May Only Vote Through the Depositary

Under Mexican law, a shareholder is required to deposit its shares with a Mexican custodian in order to attend a shareholders’ meeting.  A holder of ADSs will not be able to meet this requirement, and accordingly is not entitled to attend shareholders’ meetings.  A holder of ADSs is entitled to instruct the depositary as to how to vote the shares represented by ADSs, in accordance with procedures provided for in the deposit agreement, but a holder of ADSs will not be able to vote its shares directly at a shareholders’ meeting or to appoint a proxy to do so.  In addition, such voting instructions may be limited to matters enumerated in the agenda contained in the notice to shareholders and with respect to which information is available prior to the shareholders’ meeting.

Holders of ADSs May Not Be Able to Participate in Any Future Preemptive Rights Offering and as a Result May Be Subject to a Dilution of Equity Interest

Under Mexican law, if we issue new shares for cash as a part of a capital increase, other than in connection with a public offering of newly issued shares or treasury stock, we must generally grant our shareholders the right to purchase a sufficient number of shares to maintain their existing ownership percentage.  Rights to purchase shares in these circumstances are known as preemptive rights.  We may not legally be permitted to allow holders of our shares through ADSs in the United States to exercise any preemptive rights in any future capital increases unless (i) we file a registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, with respect to that future issuance of shares or (ii) the offering qualifies for an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.  At the time of any future capital increase, we will evaluate the costs and potential liabilities associated with filing a registration statement with the SEC, as well as the benefits of preemptive rights to holders of our shares through ADSs in the United States and any other factors that we consider important in determining whether to file a registration statement.

We are under no obligation to, and there can be no assurance that we will, file a registration statement with the SEC to allow holders of our shares through ADSs in the United States to participate in a preemptive rights offering.  In addition, under current

14

Mexican law, sales by the ADS depositary of preemptive rights and distribution of the proceeds from such sales to the holders of our shares through ADSs is not possible.  As a result, the equity interest of holders of our shares through ADSs would be diluted proportionately and such holders may not receive any economic compensation.  See “Item 10.  Additional Information—Bylaws—Preemptive Rights.”

The Protections Afforded to Minority Shareholders in Mexico Are Different From Those in the United States

Under Mexican law, the protections afforded to minority shareholders are different from those in the United States.  In particular, the law concerning fiduciary duties of directors, executive officers and controlling shareholders has been recently developed and there is no legal precedent to predict the outcome of any such action.  Additionally, shareholders’ class actions are not available under Mexican law and there are different procedural requirements for bringing shareholder derivative lawsuits.  As a result, in practice it may be more difficult for our minority shareholders to enforce their rights against us, our directors, our executive officers or our controlling shareholders than it would be for shareholders of a U.S. company.

Exchange Rate Fluctuations May Affect the Value of Our Shares

Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the peso and the U.S. dollar will affect the U.S. dollar value of an investment in our shares and of dividend and other distribution payments on those shares.  See “Item 3.  Key Information—Selected Financial Data—Exchange Rate Information” and “Item 11.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—Foreign Exchange Rate Risk.”

Mexican Law Restricts the Ability of Non-Mexican Shareholders to Invoke the Protection of Their Governments With Respect to Their Rights as Shareholders

As required by Mexican law, our bylaws provide that non-Mexican shareholders shall be treated as Mexican shareholders in respect to their ownership interests in us, and shall be deemed to have agreed not to invoke the protection of their governments under any circumstance, under penalty of forfeit, in favor of the Mexican government, any participation or interest held in us.

Under this provision, a non-Mexican shareholder is deemed to have agreed not to invoke the protection of its own government by requesting the initiation of a diplomatic claim against the Mexican government with respect to its shareholder’s rights.  However, this provision shall not deem non-Mexican shareholders to have waived any other rights they may have, including any rights under the U.S. securities laws, with respect to their investment in us.

Our Controlling Shareholder Exerts Substantial Control Over Our Company

As of April 25, 2014, Ms. Graciela Moreno Hernández, the widow of the late Mr. Roberto González Barrera, and certain of her descendants (the “Primary Shareholder Group”) controlled approximately 55.65% of our outstanding shares.  See “Item 10.  Additional Information—Bylaws—Changes in Capital stock.” Consequently, the Primary Shareholder Group, acting together, has the power to elect the majority of our directors and to determine the outcome of most actions requiring approval of our stockholders, including the declaration of dividends.

The interests of the Primary Shareholder Group may differ from those of our other shareholders.  See “Item 7.  Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders.”

We cannot assure you that the Primary Shareholder Group will continue to act together for purposes of control. Additionally, the Primary Shareholder Group may pledge part of its shares in us to secure any future borrowings. If such was the case and the Primary Shareholder Group were to default on its payment obligations, the lenders could enforce their rights with respect to such shares and the Primary Shareholder Group could lose its controlling interest in us resulting in a change of control. A change of control could trigger a default in some of our credit agreements and the indenture governing our perpetual bonds outstanding, all together, in an aggregate prinicipal amount of U.S.$983.5 million as of December 31, 2013. Such default could have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Our Antitakeover Protections May Deter Potential Acquirors

Certain provisions of our bylaws could make it substantially more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us.  These provisions in our bylaws may discourage certain types of transactions involving the acquisition of our securities.  These provisions could discourage transactions in which our shareholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over the then current

15

market price.  Holders of our securities who acquire shares in violation of these provisions will not be able to vote, or receive dividends, distributions or other rights in respect of, these securities and would be obligated to pay us a penalty.  For a description of these provisions, see “Item 10.  Additional Information—Bylaws—Other Provisions—Antitakeover Protections.”

We Are a Holding Company and Depend Upon Dividends and Other Funds From Subsidiaries to Service Our Debt

We are a holding company with no significant assets other than the shares of our subsidiaries.  As a result, our ability to meet our debt service obligations depends primarily on the dividends received from our subsidiaries.  Under Mexican law, companies may only pay dividends:

·from earnings included in year-end financial statements that are approved by shareholders at a duly convened meeting;

·after any existing losses applicable to prior years have been made up or absorbed into stockholders’ equity;

·after at least 5% of net profits for the relevant fiscal year have been allocated to a legal reserve until the amount of the reserve equals 20% of a company’s paid-in capital stock; and

·after shareholders have approved the payment of the relevant dividends at a duly convened meeting.

In addition, Gruma Corporation is subject to covenants in some of its debt agreements which require the maintenance of specified financial ratios and balances and, upon an event of default, prohibit the payment of cash dividends.  For additional information concerning these restrictions on inter-company transfers, see “Item 3.  Key Information—Selected Financial Data—Dividends” and “Item 5.  Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

We own approximately 83% of the outstanding shares of Grupo Industrial Maseca, S.A.B. de C.V., or GIMSA; accordingly, we are entitled to receive only our pro rata share of any of its dividends.

We also own 76% of MONACA and 60% of DEMASECA. However, as of January 22, 2013, we lost control of MONACA and DEMASECA as a consequence of the actions of the Venezuelan Government.  See “Item 3.  Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Related to Venezuela.”

ITEM 4Information on the Company.

HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT

Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. is a publicly held corporation (Sociedad Anónima Bursátil de Capital Variable) registered in Monterrey, Mexico under the Ley General de Sociedades Mercantiles, or Mexican Corporations Law, on December 24, 1971, with a corporate life of 99 years.  Our full legal name is Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V., but we are also known by our commercial names: GRUMA and MASECA.  The address of our principal executive office is Calzada del Valle, 407 Ote., Colonia del Valle, San Pedro Garza García, Nuevo León, 66220, Mexico and our telephone number is (52) 81 8399-3300.  Our legal domicile is San Pedro Garza García, Nuevo León, México.

We were founded in 1949, when the late Roberto González Barrera started producing and selling corn flour in Northeastern Mexico as an alternative raw material for producing tortillas.  Prior to our founding, all corn tortillas were made using a rudimentary process.  We believe that the preparation of tortillas using our dry corn flour method presents significant advantages, including greater efficiency and higher quality, which makes tortillas consistent and readily available.  The corn flour process has been a significant impetus for growth, resulting in expanding corn flour and tortilla production and sales throughout Mexico, the United States, Central America, Europe, Asia, Oceania and other regions where we operate.  In addition, we have diversified our product mix to include wheat flour in Mexico, other types of flatbreads (pita, naan, chapatti, pizza bases and piadina) mainly in Europe, Asia and Oceania, and corn grits mainly in Europe, among other products in the regions where we have presence.

One of our most important competitive advantages is our proprietary state-of-the art technology for the manufacturing of corn flour and tortillas and other related products.  We have been developing and advancing our own technology since the founding of our company.  Throughout the years we have been able to achieve vertical integration which is an important part of our competitive advantage.

The following are some significant historical highlights:

16

·In 1949, Roberto González Barrera and a group of predecessor Mexican corporations founded GIMSA, which is engaged principally in the production, distribution and sale of corn flour in Mexico.

·In 1972, we entered the Central American market with our first operation in Costa Rica.  Today, we have operations in Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador and Nicaragua, as well as Ecuador, which we include as part of our Central American operations.

·In 1977, we entered the U.S. market.  Our operations have grown to include products such as tortillas, corn flour, and other tortilla related products.

·From 1989 to 1995, we significantly increased our installed manufacturing capacity in the United States and in Mexico.

·In 1993, we entered the Venezuelan corn flour market through an investment in DEMASECA, a Venezuelan corporation producing corn flour.

·In 1994, GRUMA became a publicly listed company in both Mexico and the U.S.

·In 1996, we strengthened our position in the U.S. corn flour market through an association with Archer-Daniels-Midland.  Through this association we combined our existing U.S. corn flour operations and strengthened our position in the U.S. corn flour market.  This association also allowed us to enter the Mexican wheat flour market by acquiring a 60% ownership interest in Archer-Daniels-Midland’s Mexican wheat flour operations.  Archer-Daniels-Midland no longer holds an ownership interest in the Company. See “Item 4.  Information on the Company—Share Purchase Transaction with Archer-Daniels-Midland.”

·From 1997 to 2000, we initiated a significant plant expansion program.  During this period, we acquired or built tortilla plants, corn flour plants and wheat flour plants in the United States, Mexico, Central America, Venezuela and Europe.

·From 2001 to 2003, we entered into a comprehensive review of our business portfolio and focused on our core businesses.

·In 2004, we increased our presence in Europe by acquiring Ovis Boske, a tortilla company based in the Netherlands, and Nuova De Franceschi & Figli, a corn flour company based in Italy.  We continued to expand capacity and upgrade several of our U.S. operations, the most relevant of which was the expansion of a corn mill in Indiana.

·In 2005, we continued to expand capacity at existing plants, began the construction of a tortilla plant in the northeast of the U.S., acquired three tortilla plants from Cenex Harvest States or CHS (located in Minnesota, Texas and Arizona) and one more in San Francisco, California.  In addition, GIMSA acquired Agroindustrias Integradas del Norte and Agroinsa de México (together, and with their subsidiaries, Agroinsa), a group of companies engaged primarily in the production of corn flour and, to a lesser extent, wheat flour and other products in Mexico.

·In 2006, we acquired two small tortilla plants in Australia (Rositas Investments and Oz-Mex Foods) and opened our first tortilla plant in China, which strengthened our presence in the Asian and Oceania markets.  We concluded the acquisition of Pride Valley Foods, a company based in England that produces tortillas, pita bread, naan, and chapatti, thus expanding our product portfolio to other types of flatbreads.

·In 2007, we entered into a contract to sell a 40% stake in MONACA to our former partner in DEMASECA.  In conjunction with this transaction, we also agreed to purchase an additional 10% ownership interest in DEMASECA from our former partner.  We also purchased the remaining 49% ownership interest in Nuova De Franceschi & Figli.  In addition, we made major investments in capacity expansions and upgrades in Gruma Corporation, started the construction of a new tortilla plant in Australia for Gruma Asia & Oceania, and expanded two of GIMSA’s plants.

·From 2008 to 2010, we made capital expenditures for the construction of a tortilla plant in southern California, capacity expansions, general manufacturing and technology upgrades to several of our existing facilities, the construction of a tortilla plant in Australia, the construction of a wheat mill in Venezuela, and the acquisition of the leading producer of corn grits in Ukraine.

17

·In 2011, we acquired Semolina, the Turkish market leading producer of corn grits, two tortilla plants in the U.S. located in Omaha, Nebraska and Albuquerque, New Mexico, and Solntse Mexico, the leading tortilla manufacturer in Russia.

·In 2012, our founder Mr. Roberto González Barrera passed away.  In December 2012, we repurchased from Archer-Daniels-Midland 23.16% of our issued shares as well as Archer-Daniels-Midland’s minority stakes in Azteca Milling, L.P., Molinera de México, S.A. de C.V., Consorcio Andino, S.L. and Valores Mundiales, S.L.  See “Item 4.  Information on the Company—Share Purchase Transaction with Archer-Daniels-Midland.”

·In 2013, we deconsolidated the Venezuelan Companies. See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Related to Venezuela— We have Deconsolidated our Interest in the Venezuelan Companies which are Currently Involved in Expropriation and Arbitration Proceedings”.

18

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

We are a holding company and conduct our operations through subsidiaries.  The table below sets forth our principal subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013.

Name of Company	Principal Markets	Jurisdiction of Incorporation	Percentage Owned(1)		Products/ Services
Mexican Operations
Grupo Industrial Maseca, S.A.B. de C.V. (“GIMSA”)	Mexico	Mexico	83	%	Corn flour, Other
Molinera de México, S.A. de C.V. (“Molinera de México”)	Mexico	Mexico	100	%	Wheat flour, Other
U.S. and Europe Operations
Gruma Corporation	United States and Europe	Nevada	100	%	Tortillas, Other tortilla related products, Corn flour, Flatbreads, Grits, Other
Azteca Milling, LP. (“Azteca Milling”)	United States	Texas	100	%	Corn flour
Central American Operations
Gruma de Guatemala, S.A., Derivados de Maíz Alimenticio, S.A., Industrializadora y Comercializadora de Palmito, S.A., Derivados de Maíz de Guatemala, S.A., Tortimasa, S.A., Derivados de Maíz de El Salvador, S.A., and Derivados de Maíz de Honduras, S.A. (“Gruma Centroamérica”)	Costa Rica, Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Ecuador	Costa Rica, Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Ecuador	100	%	Corn flour, Tortillas, Snacks, Hearts of palm, Rice
Other Subsidiaries
Mission Foods (Shanghai) Co. Ltd., Gruma Oceania Pty. Ltd., and Mission Foods (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. (“Gruma Asia and Oceania”)	Asia and Oceania	China, Malaysia and Australia	100	%	Tortillas, Chips, Other products
Productos y Distribuidora Azteca, S.A. de C.V. (“PRODISA”)	Mexico	Mexico	100	%	Tortillas, Other related products
Investigación de Tecnología Avanzada, S.A. de C.V. (“INTASA”) (2)	Mexico	Mexico	100	%	Construction, Technology and Equipment operations
Deconsolidated Venezuelan Operations (3)
Molinos Nacionales, C.A. (“MONACA”) (4)	Venezuela	Venezuela	76	%	Corn flour, Wheat flour, Other products
Derivados de Maíz Seleccionado, C.A. (“DEMASECA”) (4)	Venezuela	Venezuela	60	%	Corn flour

(1)Percentage of equity capital owned by us directly or indirectly through subsidiaries.

19

(2)As of March 21, 2014, INTASA merged into Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V., and ceased to exist. As a result of such merger, all assets and liabilities, rights and obligations of INTASA, including its rights over trademarks, patents and/or any other intellectual property, are now owned by Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V.

(3)Together these subsidiaries are referred to as the “Venezuelan Companies.”  We  deconsolidated the Venezuelan Companies as of January 22, 2013 and report them as a discontinued operation.

(4)RFB Holdings de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. holds a 24.14% indirect interest in MONACA and 40% in DEMASECA.  See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Related to Venezuela—The Venezuelan Companies are Currently Involved in Expropriation and Arbitration Proceedings” and “Item 10.  Additional Information—Material Contracts—Archer-Daniels-Midland.”

Our consolidated subsidiaries accounted for the following percentages and amount of our net sales in millions of pesos for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.

	Year ended December 31,
	2013				2012				2011
	In Millions of Pesos		Percentage of Net Sales		In Millions of Pesos		Percentage of Net Sales		In Millions of Pesos		Percentage of Net Sales
Gruma Corporation	Ps.	27,801	52	%	Ps.	26,932	50	%	Ps.	24,098	50	%
GIMSA	16,436		30		17,573		32		15,386		32
Molinera de México	4,983		9		5,046		9		4,633		10
Gruma Centroamérica	3,386		6		3,369		6		3,180		6
Others and eliminations	1,500		3		1,489		3		1,191		2
Total	Ps.	54,106	100		Ps.	54,409	100		Ps.	48,488	100

Share Purchase Transaction with Archer-Daniels-Midland

We entered into an association with Archer-Daniels-Midland in September 1996. Archer-Daniels-Midland is one of the world’s largest agricultural processors and traders.  Through our partnership we improved our position in the U.S. corn flour market and gained an immediate presence in the Mexican wheat flour market. See “Item 7.  Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Transactions with Archer-Daniels-Midland.”  On December 14, 2012, we acquired the stake that Archer-Daniels-Midland owned directly and indirectly in the Company and certain of our subsidiaries (the ‘‘Equity Interests’’) through the exercise of a purchase option pursuant to certain rights of first refusal (the “ADM Transaction”), consisting of:

·18.81% of the then outstanding shares of Gruma S.A.B. de C.V. and, indirectly, an additional 4.35% of the then outstanding shares of Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. via the acquisition of 45% of the shares of Valores Azteca, S.A. de C.V. (‘‘Valores Azteca’’), a company that owned 9.66% of the shares of Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V.;

·3% of the partnership interest of Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino, holding companies of the Venezuelan companies, MONACA and DEMASECA, respectively;

·40% of the shares of Molinera de Mexico, our wheat flour business in Mexico; and

·100% of the shares of Valley Holding Inc., a company that owns 20% of Azteca Milling, our corn flour business in the United States.

The Equity Interests were acquired from Archer-Daniels-Midland for U.S.$450 million plus a contingent payment of up to U.S.$60 million, which contingent payment is payable only if during the 42 months following the closing of the ADM Transaction certain conditions are met. See “Item 10.  Additional Information—Material Contracts.” The economic terms of the ADM Transaction were based on the terms contained in the offer made by a third party to Archer-Daniels-Midland for the purchase of the Equity Interests. As a result of the ADM Transaction, Archer-Daniels-Midland no longer holds an ownership interest in the Company.

Based on a fairness opinion issued by an Independent Expert, as well as the financial analysis conducted by our management, we believe that, at the agreed values for the ADM Transaction, the ADM Transaction will generate a significant economic benefit and substantial creation of value for the Company because of the higher net income attributable to shareholders that we will obtain due to the increase of our interest in Azteca Milling and Molinera de México.  We believe this benefit will occur regardless of whether we will be required to make the contingent payment.

20

To fund the ADM Transaction, GRUMA obtained short-term unsecured loan facilities for a total amount of U.S.$400 million with maturities of up to a year (the ‘‘Short-Term Facilities’’), and used proceeds from Gruma Corporation’s revolving syndicated credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. We refinanced the Short-Term Facilities in 2013. See “Item 5—Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Indebtedness.”

Capital Expenditures

Our capital expenditure program continues to be primarily focused on our core businesses and markets.  Capital expenditures for 2011, 2012, and 2013 were U.S.$188 million, U.S.$ 197 million and U.S.$114 million, respectively.  During 2011, capital expenditures were primarily applied to production capacity expansions, manufacturing and technology upgrades, particularly in the U.S., Mexico and Europe.  We also made certain acquisitions throughout 2011, including the purchase of the leading producer of corn grits in Turkey, two tortilla plants in the U.S. and the leading tortilla manufacturer in Russia. During 2012 and 2013, capital expenditures were applied primarily to production capacity expansions, general manufacturing and technology upgrades in Gruma Corporation and GIMSA.

We have budgeted approximately U.S.$ 160 million for capital expenditures in 2014, which we intend to use mainly for production capacity expansions, general manufacturing and technology upgrades, especially in Gruma Corporation and GIMSA.  We anticipate financing these expenditures throughout the year through internally generated funds and debt.

The following table sets forth the aggregate amount of our capital expenditures during the periods indicated.

	Year ended December 31
	2013			2012		2011
	(in millions of U.S. dollars)(1)
Gruma Corporation	$	73.6		$	123.9	$	126.9
GIMSA	44.2			34.3		19.2
Molinera de México	4.6			15.8		5.7
Gruma Centroamérica	3.9			5.3		7.1
Others and eliminations	(11.9		)	17.7		28.8
Total consolidated	$	114.4		$	197.0	$	187.7

(1)Amounts in respect of some of the capital expenditures were paid for in currencies other than the U.S. dollar.  As a result, U.S. dollar amounts presented in the table above may not be comparable to data contained elsewhere in this Annual Report, which is expressed on the basis of the peso/dollar exchange rate as of December 31, 2013, unless otherwise specified.

For more information on capital expenditures for each subsidiary, please see the section entitled “Operations and Capital Expenditures” below.

BUSINESS OVERVIEW

We believe we are one of the largest corn flour and tortilla producers in the world. We also believe we are one of the leading producers of corn flour and tortillas in the United States, and one of the leading producers of corn flour and wheat flour in Mexico. We believe that we are also one of the largest producers of corn flour and tortillas in Central America, one of the largest producers of tortilla and other flatbreads, including pita, naan, chapatti, pizza bases and piadina in Europe, Asia and Oceania, and one of the leading producers of corn grits in Europe and the Middle East. Our focus has been and continues to be the efficient and profitable expansion of our core business—corn flour and tortilla. We pioneered the dry corn flour method of tortilla production, which offers several advantages over the centuries-old traditional wet corn dough method. These advantages include higher production yields, reduced production costs, more uniform quality and longer shelf life. The dry corn flour method of production offers significant opportunities for growth. Using our technology and know-how, we expect to encourage tortilla and tortilla chip producers in the United States, Mexico, Central America, and elsewhere to convert to the dry corn flour method of tortilla and tortilla chip production. We also believe there are significant opportunities for growth in our other core businesses, especially tortillas in the United States, Europe, Asia and Oceania.

21

The following table sets forth our consolidated revenues by geographic market for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.

	Year ended December 31,
	2013		2012		2011
	(in millions of pesos)
United States and Europe	Ps.	27,761	Ps.	26,901	Ps.	23,901
Mexico	21,181		22,270		19,870
Central America	3,386		3,369		3,180
Asia and Oceania	1,778		1,869		1,537
Total	Ps.	54,106	Ps.	54,409	Ps.	48,488

Strategy

Our strategy is to focus on our core business—corn flour and tortilla, as well as to expand our product portfolio towards the flatbreads category in general —and to capitalize upon our leading positions in the corn flour and tortilla industries.  We will continue taking advantage of the increasing popularity of Mexican food and, more importantly, tortillas, in the U.S., European, Asian and Oceania markets.  We will also continue taking advantage of the adoption of tortillas by the consumers of several regions of the world for the preparation of different recipes other than Mexican food.  Our strategy includes the following key elements:

Expand in the Retail and Food Service Tortilla Markets Where We Currently Have a Presence and to New Regions in the United States: We believe that the size and growth of the U.S. retail and food service tortilla markets offer significant opportunities for expansion.

Maintain Gruma Corporation’s MISSION® and GUERRERO® Tortilla Brands as the First and Second National Brands in the United States: We intend to achieve this by increasing our efforts at building brand name recognition, and by further expanding and utilizing Gruma Corporation’s distribution network, first in Gruma Corporation’s existing markets, where we believe there is potential for further growth, and second, in regions where Gruma Corporation currently does not have a significant presence but where we believe strong demand for tortillas already exists.

Encourage Transition from the Traditional Cooked-Corn Method to the Dry Corn Flour Method as Well as New Uses for Corn Flour, and Continue to Establish MASECA® as a Leading Brand: We pioneered the dry corn flour method of tortilla production, which offers several advantages over the centuries-old traditional wet corn dough method.  We continue to view the transition from the traditional method to the dry corn flour method of making tortillas and tortilla chips as the primary opportunity for increased corn flour sales.  We see an opportunity for further potential growth in the fact that the dry corn flour method is more environmentally friendly than the traditional method.  We are also working to expand the use of corn flour in the manufacture of different types of products besides tortillas and tortilla chips.

Enter and Expand in the Tortilla and Flatbread Markets in Other Regions of the World: We believe that markets in other continents such as Europe, Asia and Oceania offer us significant opportunities.  We believe our current operations in Europe will enable us to better serve markets there and in the Middle East.  Our presence in Asia and Oceania will enable us to offer our customers in those regions fresh products and respond more quickly to their needs.

Leverage Our Existing Available Production Capacity and Focus on Optimizing Operational Matters: Our investment program during recent years in plants and operations has resulted in sufficient existing capacity to meet current and foreseeable demand.  We believe that our economies of scale and existing operating synergies permit us to remain competitive without additional material capital expenditures.

Enhance Value Creation of the Company by Consolidating the Growth Experienced during Past Years: The Company is implementing initiatives oriented toward emphasizing the company’s top priority of improving profitability and cash flow generation, and strengthening its financial structure by reducing debt. This will be the foundation for resuming more aggressive and profitable growth in the future.

22

U.S. and European Operations

Overview

We conduct our United States and European operations principally through our subsidiary Gruma Corporation, which manufactures and distributes corn flour, tortillas, corn chips and related products.  Gruma Corporation commenced operations in the United States in 1977, initially developing a presence in certain major tortilla consumption markets by acquiring small tortilla manufacturers and converting their production processes from the traditional “wet corn dough” method to our dry corn flour method.  Eventually, we began to build our own state-of-the-art tortilla plants in certain major tortilla consumption markets.  We have vertically integrated our operations by (i) building corn flour and tortilla manufacturing facilities; (ii) establishing corn purchasing operations; (iii) launching marketing and advertising campaigns to develop brand name recognition; (iv) expanding distribution networks for corn flour and tortilla products; and (v) using our technology to design and build proprietary corn flour, tortilla and tortilla chip manufacturing machinery.

In September 1996, we combined our U.S. corn flour milling operations with Archer-Daniels-Midland’s corn flour milling operations into a newly formed limited partnership known as Azteca Milling, L.P., in which Gruma Corporation held an 80% interest. As a result of the ADM Transaction, Gruma Corporation now holds a 100% interest in Azteca Milling.  See “Item 4.  Information on the Company—Share Purchase Transaction with Archer-Daniels-Midland.”

During 2000, Gruma Corporation opened its first European tortilla and corn chips plant in Coventry, England, initiating our entry into the European market.

Gruma Corporation

Gruma Corporation operates primarily through its Mission Foods division, which produces tortillas and related products, and Azteca Milling, a limited partnership wholly owned by Gruma Corporation which produces corn flour.  We believe Gruma Corporation is one of the leading manufacturers and distributors of tortillas and related products throughout the United States and Europe through its Mission Foods division.  We believe Gruma Corporation is also one of the leading producers of corn flour in the United States through its Azteca Milling division.

Principal Products.  Mission Foods manufactures and distributes corn and wheat tortillas and related products (which include tortilla chips) under the MISSION®, GUERRERO® and CALIDAD® brand names in the United States, as well as other minor regional brands.  By continuing to build MISSION® into a strong national brand for the general consumer market, GUERRERO® into a strong Hispanic consumer focused brand and CALIDAD® as our value brand in tortillas and chips, Mission Foods expects to increase market penetration, brand awareness and profitability.  Azteca Milling manufactures and distributes corn flour in the United States under the MASECA® brand, and, to a lesser extent, under our value brand TORTIMASA®.

Sales and Marketing.  Mission Foods serves both retail and food service customers.  In the U.S., retail customers represented approximately 80% of our sales volume in 2013, including supermarkets, mass merchandisers, membership stores and smaller independent stores.  Our food service customers include major chain restaurants, food service distributors, schools, hospitals and the military.  In our European business, approximately half of our tortilla production is allocated to retail sales, and the other half to the food service segment, including quick-service restaurants and food processors.

For the U.S. tortilla market, Mission Foods’ current marketing strategy is to focus on core products and drive organic, profitable, and sustainable growth, while creating a strong value proposition for our consumers through superior consumer knowledge and understanding, excellence in customer service and effective marketing programs. Mission Foods promotes its products primarily through merchandising programs with supermarkets, and, to a lesser extent, joint promotions with other companies’ products that may be complementary to ours as well as radio and television advertising, targeting both Hispanic and non-Hispanic populations.  We believe these efforts have contributed to greater consumer awareness, and household penetration.  Mission Foods also targets food service companies and works with restaurants, institutions and distributors to address their individual needs and provide them with a full line of products.  Mission Foods continuously attempts to identify new customers and markets for its tortillas and related products in the United States and in Europe.

Azteca Milling distributed approximately 38% of the corn flour it produces to Mission Foods’ plants throughout the United States and Europe in 2013.  Azteca Milling’s third-party customers consist largely of other tortilla manufacturers, corn chip producers, retail customers and wholesalers.  Azteca Milling sells corn flour in various quantities, ranging from four-pound retail packages to bulk railcar loads.

23

We anticipate growth in the U.S. market for corn flour, tortillas, and related products.  We believe that the growing consumption of Mexican-style foods by non-Hispanics will continue to increase demand for tortillas and tortilla related products, particularly wheat flour tortillas.  Also influential is the fact that tortillas are no longer solely used as ingredients in Mexican food; for example, tortillas are also used for wraps, which will continue to increase demand for tortillas.  Growth in the U.S. corn flour market is attributable to the conversion of tortilla and tortilla chip producers from the wet corn dough process to our dry corn flour method, the increase of the Hispanic population, the consumption of tortillas and tortilla chips by the general consumer market, and stronger and increased distribution.

Competition and Market Position.  We believe Mission Foods is one of the leading manufacturers of tortillas and related products throughout the United States and Europe.  We believe the tortilla market is highly fragmented, regional in nature and extremely competitive.  Mission Foods’ main competitors are hundreds of tortilla producers who manufacture locally or regionally and tend to be sole proprietorships.  However, a few competitors have a presence in several U.S. regions such as Olé Mexican Foods, El Milagro and Reser’s Fine Foods, among others.  In addition, a few large companies have tortilla manufacturing divisions that compete with Mission Foods, for example, Tyson, Bimbo, Hormel Foods, and General Mills.

Competitors within the corn flour milling industry include Minsa, Hari Masa, Silos de Oro, and the corn flour milling divisions of Cargill.  Azteca Milling competes with these corn flour manufacturers in the United States primarily on the basis of superior quality, technical support, customer service and brand recognition.  However, we believe there is great potential for growth by converting tortilla and tortilla chip manufacturers that still use the traditional method to our corn flour method.  We believe Azteca Milling is one of the leading producers of corn flour in the United States.

We strongly believe there is significant growth potential for tortillas, wraps and other flatbreads in all geographic areas of Europe and also through multiple channels, for example, in the retail and food service channels.  Mexican-based cuisine is gaining popularity in key markets.  Likewise, consumer trends indicate a growing need for versatile, healthy, nutritious and tasty food on-the-go, as well as for more interesting food accompaniments.  Our products address all of these needs, and their profile allows them to be easily customized to local cultures.  Mission Foods is well-placed to both drive and benefit from this situation in the coming years.

We believe Mission Foods is one of the leading tortilla producers in Europe with the main competitors being Santa Maria, General Mills and Aryzta.  There are a number of more recent players occupying niche positions in tortilla production, operating in Europe.

Operations and Capital Expenditures.  Annual total production capacity for Gruma Corporation is estimated at 2.4 million metric tons as of December 31, 2013, with an average utilization of 77% in 2013.  The average size of our plants as of December 31, 2013 was approximately 9,642 square meters (about 103,788 square feet).

Capital expenditures for the past three years were U.S.$324 million, and were primarily used for capacity expansions and general manufacturing and technology upgrades.  Capital expenditures for such period were also used for: (i) the acquisition in 2011 of two tortilla plants in the United States, Albuquerque Tortilla Company and Casa de Oro Foods, for U.S.$9 million and U.S.$23 million, respectively; (ii) the acquisition in 2011 of Solntse Mexico, the leading tortilla and corn chips manufacturer in Russia, for U.S.$9 million; (iii)  the acquisition in 2011 of Semolina, the Turkish market leading producer of corn grits, for U.S.$17 million; (iv) the acquisition in 2012 of Tortilleria Mexicana, a corn related products manufacturer in the Netherlands, for U.S.$2.3 million; and (v) the construction of a new tortilla plant in Florida in 2012.

Gruma Corporation’s projected capital expenditures for 2014 are expected to be approximately U.S.$80 million, mainly for production capacity expansions and manufacturing and technology upgrades at existing plants.

Mission Foods produces its tortillas and other related products at 27 manufacturing facilities worldwide.  Twenty two of these facilities are located in large population centers throughout the United States and five are located in Europe.  During 2009, Mission Foods closed three manufacturing facilities located in Las Vegas, Fort Worth and El Paso.  Mission Foods has shifted production to other plants to achieve savings in overhead costs.  Mission Foods will consider reopening the Fort Worth plant should market demands require additional capacity. Outside the United States, Mission Foods has two plants in England, two plants in The Netherlands, and one plant in Russia.

Mission Foods is committed to offering the best quality products to its customers through the implementation of the American Institute of Baking (“AIB”) food safety standards, and Global Food Safety Initiative (“GFSI”) recognized certification schemes such as British Retail Consortium (“BRC”) and Safe Quality Food (“SQF”).  Additionally, our plants are regularly evaluated by other third party organizations and customers.

24

All of the Mission Foods manufacturing facilities worldwide have earned either a superior or excellent category rating from the AIB-GMP (Good Manufacturing Practice) audits.  Most of Mission Foods’ U.S. plants have earned the AIB’s highest award, the combined AIB-GMP and AIB-HACCP (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points) certification.  Our recently built Florida plant is in the process of implementing AIB-GMP audits this year and five other plants have not yet gone through the AIB-HACCP certification process.

In 2008 Mission Foods started the BRC certification process at four plants in the U.S.  By 2012, 16 plants had completed the certification process.  Additionally, one of our plants is SQF certified. Our plants in England and The Netherlands are also evaluated by third party organizations such as the AIB, International Food Standards and BRC. Our facility in Russia, which was acquired in July of 2011, operates in compliance with Russian food production laws and is audited by multiple clients. At the end of 2012, our Russian facility successfully completed an ISO 22000 audit for food safety.  The facility is currently working towards HACCP certification.

Azteca Milling produces corn flour at six plants located in Amarillo, Edinburg and Plainview, Texas; Evansville, Indiana; Henderson, Kentucky; and Madera, California.  Gruma Corporation also produces corn flour and corn grits at our plants in Ceggia, Italy; Cherkassy, Ukraine; and Samsun, Turkey.  The majority of our plants are located within important corn growing areas.  Due to Azteca Milling’s manufacturing practices and processes, all six facilities located in the U.S. have achieved ISO 9002 certification as well as the AIB certification.  Our corn flour plants in Italy and Ukraine have obtained the BRC certification.  Additionally, our corn flour mill in Italy obtained the OHSAS 18001 international workplace safety standards certification, and our corn flour plant in Turkey has obtained the International Featured Standards certification, among others.

Seasonality.  We believe there is no significant seasonality in our products, however certain products tend to experience a slight volume increase during the summer months.  Tortillas and tortilla chips sell year round, with special peaks during the summer, when we increase our promotion and advertising by taking advantage of several holidays and major sporting events.  Tortilla and tortilla chip sales decrease slightly towards the end of the year when many Mexicans go back to Mexico for the holidays.  Sales of corn flour fluctuate seasonally as demand is higher in the fourth quarter during the holidays because of the preparation of Mexican food recipes that are very popular during this time of the year.

Raw Materials.  Corn is the principal raw material used in the production of corn flour, which is purchased from local producers.  Azteca Milling buys corn only from farmers and grain elevators that agree to supply varieties of corn approved for human consumption.  Azteca Milling tests and monitors its raw material purchases for corn not approved for human consumption, for certain strains of bacteria, fungi metabolites and chemicals.  In addition, Azteca Milling applies certain testing protocols to incoming raw materials to identify genetically modified products not approved for human consumption.

Because corn prices tend to be somewhat volatile, Azteca Milling engages in a variety of hedging activities in connection with the purchase of its corn supplies, including the purchase of corn futures contracts.  In so doing, Azteca Milling attempts to assure corn availability approximately 12 months in advance of harvest time and guard against price volatility approximately six months in advance.  The Texas Panhandle currently is the single largest source of food-grade corn.  Azteca Milling is also involved in short-term contracts for corn procurement with many corn suppliers.  Where suppliers fail to deliver, Azteca Milling can easily access the spot markets.  Azteca Milling does not anticipate any difficulties in securing adequate corn supplies in the future.

Corn flour for Mission Foods U.S. operations is supplied by Azteca Milling, and to a much lesser extent, by GIMSA.  Corn flour for Mission Foods European operations is supplied mainly by our corn mill in Italy.

Wheat flour for the production of wheat tortillas and other types of wheat flat breads is purchased from third party producers at prices prevailing in the commodities markets.  Mission Foods believes the market for wheat flour is sufficiently large and competitive to ensure that wheat flour will be available at competitive prices to supply our needs.  Contracts for wheat flour supply are made on a short-term basis.

Distribution.  An important element of Mission Foods’ sales growth has been the expansion and improvement of its tortilla distribution network, including a direct-store-delivery system to distribute most of its products, providing national coverage in the U.S. to the retail grocery channel. Distribution in the U.S. is mainly through independent distributors most of them working exclusively with Mission Foods.  Depending on the size of the customer, and the category development index / brand development index metrics (“CDI/BDI Metrics”) of the geography, tortillas and other products are generally delivered daily or several times a week.  In parts of the country, for example the Northeast, where CDI/BDI Metrics are low, Mission Foods employs a warehouse distribution method, distributing also refrigerated tortillas.  In keeping with industry practice, Mission Foods generally does not have written sales agreements with its customers. Nevertheless, from time to time, Mission Foods enters into consumer marketing agreements with retailers, in which certain terms on how to market our products are agreed.  Mission Foods has also developed a North American food service distribution network that encompasses all regions in the U.S. and the majority of provinces in Canada.

25

The vast majority of corn flour produced by Azteca Milling in the U.S. is sold to tortilla and tortilla chip manufacturers and is delivered directly from the plants to the customer.  Azteca Milling’s retail customers are primarily serviced by a network of distributors, although a few large retail customers have their corn flour delivered directly to them from the plants.

Almost all of the corn flour and corn grits produced in Europe are sold to beer, snacks, tortilla chip and taco shell manufacturers, and are delivered directly from the plants to the customer.  We also supply customers in several industries like breakfast cereals and polenta, among others.  Retail customers are primarily serviced by a network of distributors, although a few large retail customers have their corn flour delivered directly to them from the plants.

Mexican Operations

Overview

Our largest business in Mexico is the manufacture and sale of corn flour, which we conduct through our subsidiary GIMSA.  We also operate a wheat milling business in Mexico through Molinera de México.  Our other subsidiaries engage in the manufacturing and distribution of tortillas and other related products in northern Mexico, conduct research and development regarding corn flour and tortilla manufacturing equipment, produce machinery for corn flour and tortilla production and construct our corn flour manufacturing facilities.

GIMSA—Corn Flour Operation

Principal Products.  GIMSA produces corn flour in Mexico, which is then used in the preparation of tortillas and other related products.  GIMSA also produces wheat flour and other related products, to a lesser extent.

We believe GIMSA is one of the largest corn flour producers in Mexico.  GIMSA estimates that its corn flour is used in one quarter of the corn tortillas consumed in Mexico.  It sells corn flour in Mexico mainly under the brand name MASECA®.  MASECA®, a standard fine-textured, white corn flour is a ready-mixed corn flour that becomes dough when water is added.  This corn dough can then be pressed to an appropriate thickness, cut to shape and cooked to produce tortillas and similar food products.

GIMSA produces over 50 varieties of corn flour for the manufacture of different food products which are developed to meet the requirements of our different types of customers according to the kind of tortillas they produce and markets they serve.  It sells corn flour to tortilla and tortilla chip manufacturers as well as in the retail market.

Sales and Marketing.  GIMSA sells packaged corn flour in bulk mainly to thousands of small tortilla manufacturers, or tortillerías, which purchase in 20-kilogram sacks and produce tortillas on their premises for sale to local markets.  To a lesser extent, GIMSA also sells corn flour in bulk to supermarkets’ in-store tortillerías and snack manufacturers.  Additionally, GIMSA sells corn flour in the retail market in one-kilogram packages.

The following table sets forth GIMSA’s bulk and retail sales volume of corn flour, and other products for the periods indicated.

	Year Ended December 31, (tons in thousands)
	2013		2012		2011
	Tons	%	Tons	%	Tons	%
Corn Flour
Bulk	1,443	78	1,517	77	1,528	78
Retail	242	13	284	14	292	15
Other	167	9	182	9	139	7
Total	1,852	100	1,983	100	1,959	100

Retail sales of corn flour are channeled to two distinct markets: urban centers and rural areas.  Sales to urban consumers are made mostly through supermarket chains that use their own distribution networks to distribute MASECA® corn flour or through wholesalers who sell the product to smaller grocery stores throughout Mexico.  Sales to rural consumers are made principally through the Mexican government’s social welfare retail chain, a social and distribution program named Diconsa, S.A. de C.V., or DICONSA, which consists of a network of small government-owned stores and which supplies rural areas with basic food products.

Mexico’s tortilla industry is highly fragmented, consisting mostly of tortillerías, many of which continue to utilize, what is in our opinion, the relatively inefficient wet corn dough method of tortilla production (the traditional method).  We estimate that the

26

traditional wet corn dough method accounts for approximately 64% of all tortillas produced in Mexico.  Tortilla producers that do not utilize corn flour buy the wet dough from dough producers or buy and mill their own corn and produce wet corn dough themselves.

We believe the preparation of tortillas using the dry corn flour method possesses several advantages over the traditional method.  This traditional method is a rudimentary practice requiring more energy, time and labor because it involves cooking the corn in water with lime, milling the cooked corn, creating and shaping the dough, and then making tortillas from that dough.  We pioneered the dry corn flour method in which we mill the raw corn in our facilities into corn flour.  Tortilla producers and consumers, once they acquire the corn flour, may then simply add water to quickly transform the flour into wet dough to produce tortillas.  Our internal studies show that the dry corn flour method consumes less water, electricity, fuel and labor.  We estimate that one kilogram of corn processed through the dry corn flour method yields more tortillas on average than a similar amount of corn processed using the traditional method.  Corn flour is also transported more easily and under better sanitary conditions than wet corn dough and has a shelf life of approximately three months depending on storage conditions, compared with one or two days for wet corn dough.  Additionally, the corn flour’s longer shelf life makes it easier for consumers in rural areas, where tortillerías are relatively scarce, to produce their own tortillas.

We believe in the benefits of our dry corn flour method and also believe that we have substantial opportunities for growth by encouraging a transition to our method.  Corn flour is primarily used to produce corn tortillas, a principal staple of the Mexican diet.  The tortilla industry is one of the largest industries in Mexico as tortillas constitute the single largest component of Mexico’s food industry.  However, there is still reluctance to abandon the traditional practice, particularly in central and southern Mexico.  Corn dough producers and/or tortilla producers using the traditional method are generally not required to comply with environmental regulations, which represents savings for them.  To the extent regulations in Mexico are enforced and we and our competitors are on the same footing, we expect to benefit from these developments.

GIMSA has embarked on several programs to promote corn flour sales to tortilla producers and consumers.  GIMSA offers incentives to potential customers, such as small independent tortillerías, to convert to the dry corn flour method from the traditional wet corn dough method.  The incentives GIMSA offers include new, easy to use equipment designed specifically for small-volume users, financing, and individualized training.  For example, in order to assist traditional tortilla producers in making the transition to corn flour, GIMSA also sells specially designed mixers made by Tecno Maíz, S.A. de C.V., or Tecnomaíz, one of our research and development subsidiaries.  For more information about our research and development department, see “Item 4—Information on the Company—Miscellaneous—Technology and Equipment Operations.” GIMSA also helps its tortillería customers to improve sales by directing consumer promotions to heighten the desirability of their products and increase consumption, which, in turn, should increase corn flour sales and our brand equity.

During 2013, GIMSA changed its marketing and advertising strategy, now focusing on supporting its points of sale to reach the clients directly, and strengthen its distributors in order to increase MASECA’s market presence and reinforce the latter’s image and brand recognition.

GIMSA is aware of the dynamism of the Mexican market.  In order to adapt quickly and to anticipate new customers’ needs, GIMSA continued diversifying its sales force in specialized teams to be able to satisfy different types of customers, focusing primarily in increasing product availability and achieving higher market coverage.  GIMSA also continues working on the conversion of customers from the traditional process of preparing tortillas to our corn flour method, for which we have agents whose main goal is to show tortilla manufacturers that use the traditional method, the benefits of corn flour and its use method, seeking to change its manufacturing process and the raw materials they use for producing tortillas. GIMSA has also developed a new kind of corn flour called “Nixtamasa” whose characteristics resemble the dough that is produced via the traditional method.

The Company undertakes the following ongoing initiatives in an effort to improve operational efficiency, increase consumption of corn flour, and improve on its successful business model to attract new customers:

·initiatives designed to strengthen commercial relations with our existing customers, primarily by offering personalized customer service and sales programs to our customers, including the development of comprehensive business models;

·initiatives designed to increase coverage in regions with low corn flour consumption with special promotions tailored specifically to these markets;

·design of individualized support regarding the type of machinery required for their business, financial advisory and training;

27

·assistance to customers in the development of new profitable distribution methods to increase their market penetration and sales;

·development of tailored marketing promotions to increase consumption in certain customer segments; and

·assistance to customers in the development of new higher margin products such as tortilla chips, taco shells and enchilada tortillas, reflecting consumption trends.

Competition and Market Position.  GIMSA faces competition on three levels—from other corn flour producers, from sellers of wet corn dough and from the many tortillerías that produce their own wet corn dough on their premises.  We estimate that the traditional wet corn dough method accounts for approximately 64% of all tortillas produced in Mexico.GIMSA’s biggest challenge in increasing its market share is the prevalence of the traditional method.  In the corn flour industry, GIMSA’s principal competitors are Grupo Minsa and a few regional corn flour producers.  OPTIMASA, a subsidiary of Cargill de México, has offered corn flour in the central region of Mexico since 2005.  Hari Masa has also become a competitor for GIMSA.  Hari Masa’s primary area of influence is the Northeastern area. Hari Masa has also expanded its operations to the Gulf and Eastern part of Mexico since 2010, and built a plant in Tabasco in 2013 for the southeast market.  We compete against other corn flour manufacturers on the basis of quality, brand recognition, technology, customer service and nationwide coverage.  We believe that GIMSA has certain competitive advantages resulting from its proprietary technology, greater economies of scale and broad geographic coverage, which may provide it with opportunities to more effectively source raw materials and reduce transportation costs.

Operations and Capital Expenditures.  GIMSA currently owns 19 corn flour mills, all of which are located throughout Mexico, typically within corn growing regions and those of large tortilla consumption.  GIMSA also owns two more plants, one of which produces wheat flour and the other, corn grits and several types of corn based products.  Three of GIMSA’s plants are idle.  The Chalco plant has been inactive since October 1999. GIMSA will consider reopening this plant should market demands require additional capacity.  The other two plants (Monterrey and Celaya) have been idle since February 2006.  These assets are currently being depreciated.

Annual total production capacity for GIMSA is estimated at 3 million metric tons as of December 31, 2013, with an average utilization of 61% in 2013.  The average size of our plants as of December 31, 2013 was approximately 20,342 square meters (approximately 218,881 square feet).

In recent years, GIMSA’s capital expenditures were primarily used to upgrade technology, corn flour production processes and capacity expansions at certain plants.  GIMSA spent U.S.$98 million for these purposes from 2011 to 2013.  GIMSA currently projects total capital expenditures during 2014 of approximately U.S.$40 million, which will be used primarily for updating technology and production capacity expansion projects at certain plants.

During 2013 and pursuant to an agreement between GIMSA and Investigación de Tecnología Avanzada, or INTASA, INTASA provided technical assistance to each of GIMSA’s operating subsidiaries for which each paid to INTASA a fee equal to 0.5% of its consolidated net sales.  Each of GIMSA’s corn flour facilities uses proprietary technology developed by our technology and equipment operations.  For more information about our in-house technology and design initiatives, see “Item 4—Information on the Company—Miscellaneous—Technology and Equipment Operations” and “Item 4—Information on the Company—Organizational Structure—INTASA.”

Seasonality.  The demand for corn flour varies slightly with the seasons, with some minor increases during the December holidays.

Raw Materials.  Corn is the principal raw material required for the production of corn flour, and constituted 61% of GIMSA’s cost of sales for 2013.  We purchase corn primarily from Mexican growers and grain elevators, and from world markets usually at international prices.  Most of our domestic corn purchases are made through ASERCA, a governmental program established and supported by the Mexican Ministry of Agriculture, where contracts are entered into once the corn is planted to guarantee price and delivery upon harvest.  Compañía Nacional Almacenadora, S.A. de C.V., a subsidiary of GIMSA, enters into contracts for GIMSA, purchases the corn, and also monitors, selects, handles and ships the corn.

We believe that the diverse geographic locations of GIMSA’s production facilities in Mexico enable GIMSA to achieve savings in raw material transportation and handling.  In addition, by sourcing corn locally for its plants, GIMSA is better able to communicate with local growers concerning the size and quality of the corn crop and is better able to maintain quality control.  In Mexico, GIMSA purchases corn on delivery in order to strengthen its ability to obtain the highest quality corn on the best terms.

28

Traditionally, domestic corn prices in Mexico typically follow trends in the international market.  During most periods, the price at which GIMSA purchases corn depends on the price of corn in the international market.  As a result, corn prices are sometimes unstable and volatile.  Additionally, in the past, the Mexican government has supported the price of corn.  For more information regarding the government’s effect on corn prices, see “Item 3.  Key Information—Risk Factors—Our Business Operations Could Be Affected by Government Policies in Mexico” and “Item 4.  Information on the Company—Regulation.”

In addition to corn, the other principal materials and resources used in the production of corn flour are packaging materials, water, lime, additives and energy.  GIMSA believes that its sources of supply for these materials and resources are adequate, although energy, additives and packaging costs tend to be volatile.

Distribution. We have our own sales teams that are capable of servicing all sales channels, which allows us to know our clients’ needs.  GIMSA’s products are distributed mainly through independent transport firms contracted by GIMSA and, to a lesser extent, using our own fleet, depending on the type of client.  Most of GIMSA’s sales are made free-on-board at GIMSA’s plants, in particular those to tortilla manufacturers.  With respect to other sales, in particular sales to the Mexican government, large supermarket chains, and snack producers, GIMSA pays the freight cost.

Molinera de México—Wheat Flour Operation

Principal Products.  In 1996, through our former association with Archer-Daniels-Midland, we entered the wheat milling market in Mexico by acquiring a 60% ownership interest in Archer-Daniels-Midland’s wheat flour operation, Molinera de México.  However, as a result of the ADM Transaction we now hold a 100% ownership interest in Molinera de México. See “Item 4.  Information on the Company—Share Purchase Transaction with Archer-Daniels-Midland.” Molinera de México’s main product is wheat flour, although it also sells wheat bran and other byproducts. Our wheat flour brands are REPOSADA®, PODEROSA® and SELECTA®, among others.  SELECTA®, is our main brand in the retail segment.

Sales and Marketing.  In 2013, approximately 85% of Molinera’s wheat flour production was sold in bulk and 15% was sold for the retail segment.  Most of the bulk sales are made to thousands of traditional bakeries and tortillerías, supermarkets’ in-store bakeries and, to a lesser extent, to cookie and pasta manufacturers.  Most of the retail sales are made to large supermarkets and wholesalers throughout Mexico. Through wholesalers, our products are distributed to small grocery stores.

Our marketing strategy depends on the type of customer and region.  Overall, our aim is to offer products according to customers’ specifications as well as technical support.  We are trying to increase our market share in bakeries by offering products with consistent quality.  In the retail segment we target small grocery stores through wholesalers, and supermarkets through centralized and national level negotiations.  We are focusing on improving customer service, continuing to increase our distribution of products to supermarkets’ in-store bakeries, and developing new types of pre-mixed flours for the supermarket in-store bakery segment.  We provide direct delivery to supermarkets, supermarkets’ in-store bakeries, wholesalers, industrial customers and some large bakeries.  Most small bakeries and small grocery stores are served by wholesalers.

Competition and Market Position.  We believe that we are one of Mexico’s largest wheat flour producers based on revenues and sales volume.  Molinera de México competes with many small wheat flour producers.  We believe the wheat flour industry is highly fragmented and estimate that there are over 50 participants that operate 90 wheat milling plants.  Our main competitors are Altex, Trimex, La Moderna, Tablex, La Espiga, Elizondo, Anáhuac, among others.

Operations and Capital Expenditures.  We own and operate nine wheat flour plants, including one in which we hold only a 40% ownership interest.  Annual total production capacity for Molinera de México is estimated at 920 thousand metric tons as of December 31, 2013, with an average utilization of 79% in 2013, including production volume for third parties for which Molinera de México receives a fee.  On average, the size of our plants as of December 31, 2013 was approximately 12,291 square meters (approximately 132,256 square feet).  Capital expenditures from 2011 to 2013 amounted to U.S.$26 million mainly for capacity expansions and general manufacturing and technology upgrades.  Molinera de México’s capital expenditures in 2014 are projected to be U.S.$10 million, which will be used primarily for production capacity expansion on several wheat mills and general manufacturing and technology upgrades.

Seasonality.  Molinera de México’s sales are subject to seasonality.  Higher sales volumes are achieved in the fourth and first quarters during the winter, when we believe per capita consumption of wheat-based products, especially bread and cookies, increases due in part to cold weather and the celebration of holidays occurring during these quarters.

Raw Materials.  Wheat is the principal raw material required for the production of wheat flour and constituted 74% of Molinera de México’s cost of sales for 2013.  Molinera de México purchased approximately 38% of its wheat from Mexican growers in 2013, and 62% from international markets.  Molinera de México purchases domestic wheat from local farmers and farmers’

29

associations through ASERCA, a governmental program established and supported by the Mexican Ministry of Agriculture, where contracts are entered into once the wheat is planted to guarantee price and delivery upon harvest.  Wheat is also sourced from foreign producers in the United States and Canada through different trading companies.  Purchases are made based on short-term requirements with the aim of maintaining adequate levels of inventories.

In recent years the price of wheat domestically and abroad has been volatile.  Volatility is due to the supply of wheat, which depends on various factors including the size of the harvest (which depends in large part on the weather).

Central American Operations

Overview

In 1972, we entered the Costa Rican market.  Our operations since then have expanded into Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador and Nicaragua, as well as Ecuador, which we include as part of our Central American operations.

Gruma Centroamérica

Principal Products.  Gruma Centroamérica produces corn flour, and to a lesser extent, tortillas and snacks.  We also cultivate and sell hearts of palm and process and sell rice.  We believe we are one of the largest corn flour producers in the region.  We sell corn flour under the MASECA®, TORTIMASA®, MASARICA®, MINSA® and JUANA® brands.  In Costa Rica, we sell tortillas under the TORTIRICAS® and MISSION® brands.  We operate a Costa Rican snack business which manufactures tortilla chips, potato chips and similar products under the TOSTY®, RUMBA®, BRAVOS® and TRONADITAS® brands.  Hearts of palm are exported to numerous European countries as well as the United States, Canada, Chile and Mexico.

Sales and Marketing.  80% of Gruma Centroamérica’s sales volume in 2013 derived from the sale of corn flour.

Gruma Centroamérica corn flour bulk sales are oriented predominantly to small tortilla manufacturers through direct delivery and wholesalers.  Supermarkets make up the customer base for retail corn flour.  Bulk sales volume represented approximately 53% and retail sales represented approximately 47% of Gruma Centroamérica’s corn flour sales volume during 2013.

Competition and Market Position.  We believe that Gruma holds a strong leadership position in the corn flour market in Central America based on revenues and sales volume.  We believe that there is significant potential for growth in Central America as corn flour was used in only approximately 17% of all tortilla production in 2013; the majority of tortilla manufacturers use the wet corn dough method.  We believe that Gruma is the largest producer of tortillas and snacks in Costa Rica.

Within the corn flour industry, the brands of our main competitors are: Del Comal, Doña Blanca, Selecta, Bachosa, Más Tortilla, Chortimasa, Instamasa and Doñarepa.  However, our key growth opportunity is to convert tortilla manufacturers that still use the traditional method to our corn flour method.

Operations and Capital Expenditures.  We had an annual installed production capacity of 323 thousand tons for corn flour and other products as of December 31, 2013, with an average utilization of approximately 66% during 2013.  We operate one corn flour plant in each of Costa Rica, Honduras, El Salvador, and Guatemala, for a total of four plants throughout the region.  In Costa Rica, we also have one plant producing tortillas, one plant producing snacks, one plant processing hearts of palm and one plant processing rice.  In Nicaragua and Honduras we have small tortilla plants, while in Guatemala we have a small plant that produces snacks and in Ecuador we have a small facility which processes hearts of palm.  On average, the size of our plants as of December 31, 2013 was approximately 7,100 square meters (approximately 76,424 square feet).

During 2011, 2012 and 2013 most of our capital expenditures were oriented towards general manufacturing upgrades and production capacity expansions at existing corn flour plants.  Total capital expenditures for the past three years were approximately U.S.$16 million.  Capital expenditures for 2014 are projected to be U.S.$5 million, which will be used primarily for general manufacturing and technology upgrades.

Seasonality.  Typically, corn flour sales volume is lower during the first and fourth quarters of the year due to higher corn availability and lower corn prices.

Raw Materials.  Corn is the most important raw material needed in our operations, representing 35% of the cost of sales during 2013, and is obtained primarily from imports from the United States and from local growers.  Price fluctuation and volatility are subject to domestic conditions, such as annual crop results and international conditions.

30

Discontinued Operations — Venezuelan Companies

In 1993, we entered the Venezuelan corn flour industry through a participation in DEMASECA, a corn flour company in Venezuela.  In August 1999, we acquired 95% of DAMCA International Corporation, a Delaware corporation which owned 100% of MONACA, Venezuela’s second largest corn and wheat flour producer at that time, for approximately U.S.$94 million.  Additionally, Archer-Daniels-Midland acquired the remaining 5% interest in MONACA.

In April of 2006, we entered into a series of transactions to: (i) purchase an additional 10% ownership interest in DEMASECA at a price of U.S.$2.6 million; (ii) purchase a 2% stake in MONACA from Archer-Daniels-Midland at a price of U.S.$3.3 million; and (iii) sell a 3% interest in DEMASECA to Archer-Daniels-Midland at a price of U.S.$780,000.

Additionally, in April of 2006, we entered into a contract for the sale of a stake in MONACA to Rotch Energy Holdings, N.V. (“Rotch”), a controlled entity of our former indirect partner in DEMASECA, Ricardo Fernández Barrueco.  As a result Rotch acquired a 24.14% interest in MONACA, and subsequently pledged its equity interests for the benefit of a Mexican financial institution (the “Rotch Lender”) as security for a loan to a controlled entity of Rotch.  In June of 2010, Rotch defaulted under the loan and the stake in MONACA was sold and assigned to a third investor, whose interest is held by a Mexican company, RFB Holdings de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.  RFB Holdings de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. is not affiliated with our former indirect partner in DEMASECA, Ricardo Fernández Barrueco.

As a result of the aforementioned transactions and the ADM Transaction, we currently own 75.86% of Valores Mundiales and RFB Holdings de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. owns the remaining 24.14%.  As of December 31, 2013, Valores Mundiales was the sole registered shareholder of MONACA.  In addition, we own 60% of Consorcio Andino and RFB Holdings de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. owns the remaining 40%.  As of December 31, 2013, Consorcio Andino was the sole registered shareholder of DEMASECA.  MONACA and DEMASECA are collectively referred to as “Venezuelan Companies.”

On May 12, 2010, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela published the Expropriation Decree, which announced the forced acquisition of all goods, movables and real estate of our subsidiary company in Venezuela, MONACA.  The Republic has expressed to GRUMA’s representatives that the Expropriation Decree extends to our subsidiary DEMASECA.  On January 22, 2013, the Ministry of Popular Power for Internal Relations published a Providence designating Special Managers with the broadest powers to execute all necessary actions with the purpose of achieving continuity and avoiding the disruption of operations of MONACA and DEMASECA.  This Providence granted the Special Managers the broadest authority in order to safeguard the possession, care, custody, use, and conservation of movable and immovable assets of MONACA and DEMASECA. Accordingly, as of the date of this Providence, the Republic has had control of MONACA and DEMASECA through the Special Managers, who are neither appointed nor employed by GRUMA or its subsidiaries Valores Mundiales or Consorcio Andino. As a consequence of the Providence and on the date it was published, we concluded that we had lost control of the Venezuelan Companies and ceased the consolidation of the operations of MONACA and DEMASECA in our financial statments as of January 22, 2013 and now report them as a discontinued operation. See “Item 8—Legal Proceedings—Venezuela—Expropriation Proceedings by the Venezuelan Government.”

Since the issuance of this Providence, the role of GRUMA and its subsidiaries Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino in the management of MONACA and DEMASECA, is limited to preventing deterioration of the productivity of MONACA and DEMASECA, since now that the Special Managers designated by the Republic possess the broadest management authority over these companies in accordance with the Providence.

Miscellaneous—Technology and Equipment Operations

We have developed our own technology operations since our founding.  Since 1975 our technology and equipment operations had been conducted principally through INTASA, which had two subsidiaries: Tecno Maíz, S.A. de C.V., or Tecnomaíz, and Constructora Industrial Agropecuaria, S.A. de C.V., or CIASA. As of March 21, 2014, INTASA was merged into Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V., and ceased to exist. See “Item 4—Information on the Company—Organizational Structure—INTASA.”

The principal activity of Tecnomaíz and CIASA is to provide research and development, equipment, and construction services to us and small equipment to third parties.  Through Tecnomaíz, we also engage in the design, manufacture and sale of machines for the production of tortillas and tortilla chips.  The machinery for the tortilla industry includes a range of capacities, from machines that make 15 to 300 corn tortillas per minute to dough mixers.  The equipment is sold under the TORTEC® and BATITEC® trademarks in Mexico.  Tecnomaíz also manufactures high volume energy efficient corn tortilla, wheat tortilla and tortilla chip systems that can produce up to 1,200 corn tortillas per minute, 600 wheat tortillas per minute and 3,000 pounds of chips per hour. CIASA administers and supervises the design and construction of our new plants and also provides advisory services and training to employees of our corn flour and tortilla manufacturing facilities.  We manufacture corn tortilla-making machines for sale to tortilla manufacturers and for use in “in-store tortillerías,” as well as high-capacity corn and flour tortilla-makers that are used only by us.

31

We have carried out proprietary technological research and development for corn milling and tortilla production as well as all engineering, plant design and construction through INTASA and CIASA.

GFNorte Investment

As of December 31, 2010, we held approximately 8.8% of the outstanding shares of GFNorte, a Mexican financial services holding company and parent of Banco Mercantil del Norte, S.A., or Banorte, a Mexican bank.  As of the same date, our investment in GFNorte represented Ps.4,296 million.  GFNorte’s results of operations were accounted for in our consolidated results of operations using the equity method of accounting.  For the period ended December 31, 2010, we received Ps.91 million in dividends in respect of our investment in GFNorte.

On February 15, 2011, we concluded the sale of 177,546,496 shares of the capital stock of GFNorte at a price of Ps.52 per common share (the “GFNorte Sale”), resulting in cash proceeds of Ps.9,232 million before fees and expenses.  As a result of the sale of GFNorte’s shares, we no longer hold shares of GFNorte’s capital stock.

REGULATION

Mexican Regulation

Corn Commercialization Program

To support the commercialization of corn for Mexican corn growers, Mexico’s Secretary of Agriculture, Livestock, Rural Development, Fisheries and Food Ministry (Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación, or SAGARPA), through the Agricultural Incentives and Trade Services Agency (Apoyos y Servicios a la Comercialización Agropecuaria, or ASERCA), a government agency founded in 1991, implemented a program designed to promote corn sales in Mexico.  The program includes the following objectives:

·Ensure that the corn harvest is brought to market, providing certainty to farmers concerning the sale of their crops and supply security for the buyer.

·Establish a minimum price for the farmer, and a maximum price for the buyer, which are determined based on international market prices, plus a basic formula specific for each region.

·Implement a corn hedging program to allow both farmers and buyers to minimize their exposure to price fluctuations in the international markets.

To the extent that this or other similar programs are cancelled by the Mexican government, we may be required to incur additional costs in purchasing corn for our operations, and therefore we may need to increase the prices of our products to reflect such additional costs.

Environmental Regulations

Our Mexican operations are subject to Mexican federal, state and municipal laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment.  The principal federal environmental laws are the Ley General de Equilibrio Ecológico y Protección al Ambiente, or General Law of Ecological Equilibrium and Protection of the Environment or Mexican Environmental Law, which is enforced by the Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, or Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources or SEMARNAT, the Ley General de Cambio Climático or Mexican Climate Change Law and the Ley Federal de Derechos or the Mexican Federal Law of Governmental Fees.  Under the Mexican Environmental Law, each of our facilities engaged in the production of corn flour, wheat flour, and tortillas is required to obtain an operating license from state environmental authorities upon initiating operations, and then periodically submit a certificate of operation to maintain the operating license.  Furthermore, the Mexican Federal Law of Governmental Fees requires that Mexican manufacturing plants pay a fee for water consumption and the discharge of residual waste water to drainage, whenever the quality of such water exceeds mandated thresholds.  Also, regulations have been issued concerning hazardous substances and water, air and noise pollution.  In particular, Mexican environmental laws and regulations, including the Mexican Climate Change Law, require that Mexican companies file periodic reports with respect to air and water emissions and hazardous wastes.  Additionally, they also establish standards for waste water discharge.  We must also comply with zoning regulations as well and rules regarding health, working conditions and commercial matters.  SEMARNAT and the Federal Bureau of Environmental Protection can bring administrative and criminal proceedings against companies that violate environmental laws, as well as close non-complying facilities.

32

We believe we are currently in compliance in all material respects with all applicable Mexican environmental regulations.  The level of environmental regulation and enforcement in Mexico has increased in recent years.  We expect this trend to continue and to be accelerated by international agreements between Mexico and the United States.  To the extent that new environmental regulations are issued in Mexico, we may be required to incur additional remedial capital expenditures to comply.  Management is not aware of any pending regulatory changes that would require additional remedial capital expenditures in a significant amount.

Competition Regulations

The Ley Federal de Competencia Económica or Mexican Competition Law, and the Reglamento de la Ley Federal de Competencia Económica or Regulations of the Mexican Competition Law, regulate monopolies and monopolistic practices, and require Mexican government approval for certain mergers and acquisitions.  The Mexican Competition Law grants the government the authority to establish price controls for products and services of national interest through Presidential decree, and established the Comisión Federal de Competencia, or Federal Competition Commission, to enforce the law.  Mergers and acquisitions and other transactions that may restrain trade or that may result in monopolistic or anti-competitive practices or combinations must be approved by the Federal Competition Commission.  The current Mexican Competition Law may potentially limit our business combinations, mergers and acquisitions and may subject us to greater scrutiny in the future in light of our market presence, however we do not believe that this legislation will have a material adverse effect on our business operations.

Notwithstanding the above, on June 11, 2013, an amendment to article 28 of the Mexican Constitution regarding antitrust matters, was published in the Mexican Official Gazette. Through such amendment, the State will establish a new Comisión Federal de Competencia Económica, or Federal Competition Commission, which will have all powers necessary to fulfill its purpose, regulate access to essential materials, and order any divestiture of assets, rights, ownership interests or shares of economic firms, as necessary to eliminate any anti-competitive effects. It also set forth that the Congress shall issue a law in order to implement the amendments to article 28 of the Constitution. In this regard, on February 19, 2014, the Mexican President introduced a proposal to enact a new Ley Federal de Competencia Económica, or Mexican Competition Law. As of this date, the proposal has already been analyzed, discussed and approved by the Mexican House of Representatives and the Senate, and was sent to the Executive branch for publication.

Anti-Money Laundering Regulations

The Ley Federal para la Prevención e Identificación de Operaciones con Recursos de Procedencia Ilícita or Mexican Anti-Money Laundering Law was published on the Mexican Official Gazette of the Federation on October 17, 2012, and became effective on July 17, 2013. The purpose of this law is to prevent and detect operations carried out with funds obtained from illicit activities and prohibiting payments using cash for certain types of activities above certain amounts. Under this law, persons carrying out activities that are deemed as “vulnerable” are required to identify their clients and counterparties in such activities, to keep a detailed file in connection therewith, and under certain circumstances to report those activities to the Mexican Authorities. Most of the activities are deemed as “vulnerable” only when they exceed certain thresholds set forth in the law or regulations, and reporting of such activities is generally subject to higher thresholds.  Examples of such regulated activities are: granting of loans, granting credit facilities and guarantees, leasing real estate properties and receive donations, among others. Failure to comply with this law may result in monetary and penal sanctions. We believe we are currently in compliance in all material respects with this law and we do not believe it will have a material adverse effect on our business operations.

Tax Regulations

The economic package for the 2014 fiscal year was approved by the Mexican Congress on October 31, 2013, and resulted in a tax reform. This tax reform was published on December 11, 2013 in the Mexican Official Gazette of the Federation, and became effective on January 1, 2014. As part of this reform, a new Income Tax Law was encated, which abrogated the Income Tax Law in effect since 2002.

One of the main changes provided by the new Income Tax Law consists of eliminating the tax consolidation regime in force at that date. As a result, we have the obligation to pay the deferred tax determined at that time during the five-year period starting in 2014. Also a new optional regime was established for company groups and the Company has decided to opt out of the new regime for the 2014 year.

Other changes introduced in the new Income Tax Law, consist of: (i) establishing limits for exempt benefits in favor of workers; (ii) eliminating deductibility of the social security quotas (Cuotas IMSS) paid by the employer on behalf of the workers; (iii) reducing the limits for deductibility of automobile acquisition; and (iv) introducing a 10% withholding tax over dividends paid to natural persons and foreigners, among others.

33

U.S. Federal and State Regulations

Gruma Corporation is subject to regulation by various federal, state and local agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration, Department of Labor, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the Federal Trade Commission, the Department of Transportation, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Agriculture.  We believe that we are in compliance in all material respects with all environmental and other legal requirements.  Our food manufacturing and distribution facilities are subject to periodic inspection by various federal, state and local agencies, and the equipment utilized in these facilities must generally be governmentally approved prior to operation.

European Regulation

We are subject to regulation in each country in which we operate in Europe.  We believe that we are currently in compliance with all applicable legal requirements in all material respects.

Central American and Venezuelan Regulation

Gruma Centroamérica and the Venezuelan Companies are subject to regulation in each country in which they operate.  We believe that Gruma Centroamérica and the Venezuelan Companies are currently in compliance with all applicable legal requirements in all material respects.  See “Item 3. Key Information — Risk Factors — Risks Related to Venezuela.”

Asia and Oceania Regulation

We are subject to regulation in each country in which we operate in Asia and Oceania.  We believe that we are currently in compliance with all applicable legal requirements in all material respects.

ITEM 4A.Unresolved Staff Comments.

Not applicable.

ITEM 5Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

You should read the following discussion in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto contained elsewhere herein.  Our audited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by IASB.

For more information about our financial statements in general, see “Presentation of Financial Information” and “Item 5.  Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness.”

Overview of Accounting Presentation

Our audited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB. We began reporting under IFRS for the year ending December 31, 2011, with an IFRS adoption date of January 1, 2011 and a transition date to IFRS of January 1, 2010.

Note 32 to our audited consolidated financial statements discusses new accounting pronouncements under IFRS that will become effective in 2014 or thereafter. We do not currently expect that any of these will have a significant impact on the presentation of our financial statements.

Effects of Inflation

To determine the existence of hyperinflation, we evaluate the qualitative characteristics of the economic environment of each country, as well as the quantitative characteristics established by IFRS, including an accumulated inflation rate equal or higher than 100% in the past three years.  Pursuant to this analysis, Mexico is not considered to be hyperinflationary, with annual inflation rates of 4.4% in 2010, 3.82% in 2011, 3.57% in 2012 and 3.97% in 2013.

34

Effects of Devaluation

Because a significant portion of our net sales are generated in U.S. dollars, changes in the peso/dollar exchange rate can have a significant effect upon our results of operations as reported in pesos.  When the peso depreciates against the U.S. dollar, Gruma Corporation’s net sales in U.S. dollars represent a larger portion of our net sales in peso terms than when the peso appreciates against the U.S. dollar.  When the peso appreciates against the dollar, Gruma Corporation’s net sales in U.S. dollars represent a smaller portion of our net sales in peso terms than when the peso depreciates against the dollar.  For a description of the peso/dollar exchange rate see “Item 3.  Key Information—Exchange Rate Information.”

In addition to the above, our net income may be affected by changes in our foreign exchange gain or loss, which may be impacted by significant variations in the peso/dollar exchange rate.  During 2011, 2012 and 2013, we recorded a net foreign exchange gain of Ps.41 million, a loss of Ps.(82) million and a gain of Ps.56 million, respectively.

Venezuelan Companies Deconsolidation

As disclosed in Note 28 to our audited consolidated financial statements, we concluded that we lost control of our Venezuelan operations, MONACA and DEMASECA on January 22, 2013. Consequently and as a result of such loss of control, we proceeded with the following:

a)ceased the consolidation of the financial information of MONACA and DEMASECA starting January 22, 2013 and derecognized the assets and liabilities of these companies from the consolidated balance sheet; for disclosure and presentation purposes, we consider these subsidiaries as a significant segment and therefore, applying the guidelines from IFRS 5 MONACA and DEMASECA are presented as discontinued operations; consequently, the results and cash flows generated by these Venezuelan companies for the periods presented are reported as discontinued operations;

b)the amounts recognized in other comprehensive income relating to these companies were reclassified to the consolidated income statement as part of the results from discontinued operations, considering that MONACA and DEMASECA were disposed of due to the loss of control;

c)recognized the investment in MONACA and DEMASECA as a financial asset, classifying it as an available-for-sale financial asset. We classified our investment in these companies as available for sale since management believes it is the appropriate treatment applicable to a non-voluntary disposition of assets and the asset does not fulfill the requirements of classification in another category of financial assets. Following the applicable guidelines and considering that the range of reasonable fair-value estimates was significant and the probabilities of the various estimates within the range could not be reasonably assessed, we recognized this financial asset at its carrying value translated to the functional currency of GRUMA using an exchange rate of Ps.2.9566 per bolivar (4.3 Venezuelan bolivars per U.S. dollar), which was effective at the date of the loss of control, and not at its fair value.The investment in MONACA and DEMASECA is subject to impairment tests at the end of each reporting period when there is objective evidence that the financial asset is impaired. At December 31, 2013, no impairment for these assets was identified.

While awaiting resolution on this matter and as required by IFRS, we performed impairment tests on the investments in MONACA and DEMASECA to determine a potential recoverable amount using two valuation techniques: 1) an income approach considering estimated future cash flows as a going concern business, discounted at present value using an appropriate discount rate (weighted average cost of capital) of 13.7% and an estimated future exchange rate of 11.3 Venezuelan bolivars per U.S. dollar, and 2) a market approach, such as the public company market multiple method using implied multiples such as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and revenues of comparable companies adjusted for liquidity, control and disposal expenses. In both cases, the potential recoverable amounts using the income and market approach were higher than the carrying value of these investments and therefore, no impairment adjustment was deemed necessary.

The historical value of the net investment in MONACA and DEMASECA at January 22, 2013, the date when we ceased the consolidation of the financial information of MONACA and DEMASECA, was Ps.2,913,760 and Ps.195,253, respectively. Additionally, at December 31, 2013 certain subsidiaries of GRUMA have accounts receivable with the Venezuelan companies totaling Ps.1,137,718. According to tests performed by us, these receivables are not impaired.

For more information about discontinued operations of the Venezuelan Companies, please see Note 28 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

35

Exchange Rates in Venezuela

In March 2013, the Venezuelan government announced the creation of an alternative exchange mechanism called the Supplementary System of Foreign Exchange Administration (Sistema Complementario de Administración de Divisas, SICAD). The SICAD operates as an auction system that allows entities in specific sectors to buy foreign currency for imports. This is not a free auction (that is, the counterpart that offers the highest price does not necessarily have the right to receive the foreign currency). Each auction may have different rules (for example, the minimum and maximum amount of foreign currency that may be offered to exchange). Limited amounts of dollars are available and entities do not commonly get the full amount for which they entered in auction. During December 2013, the Venezuelan government authorized the Central Bank of Venezuela to publish the average exchange rate resulting of SICAD auctions. During the weeks commencing on December 23 and December 30, 2013, the Central Bank of Venezuela published on its website the average exchange rate for auctions No.13 and No.14 (11.30 Venezuelan bolivars per U.S. dollar).

On January 24, 2014, Exchange Agreement No. 25 became effective, which establishes the concepts to which the SICAD exchange rate (11.30 Venezuelan bolivars per U.S. dollar) applies, for sale of foreign currency operations. In addition, the agreement also provides that the sale operation of foreign currency, whose clearance has been requested to the Central Bank of Venezuela before the Exchange Agreement No. 25 became effective, will be settled at the exchange rate effective on the date on which such operations were authorized. This Exchange Agreement No.25 will result in a net foreign exchange loss of Ps.142,079 to us in 2014, which will be presented as discontinued operations, this exchange loss is originated by certain accounts receivable maintained with the Venezuelan companies as of December 31, 2013 which are expected to be settled at this new exchange rate (11.30 Venezuelan bolivars per U. S. dollar).

For more information, please see Note 6 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

Critical Accounting Policies

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses our audited consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB.  The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

We have identified below the most critical accounting principles that involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity and that management believes are important to a more complete understanding of our financial position and results of operations.  These policies are outlined below.

Additional accounting policies that are also used in the preparation of our financial statements are outlined in the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.

Property, Plant and Equipment

We depreciate our property, plant and equipment over their respective estimated useful lives.  Useful lives are based on management’s estimates of the period that the assets will remain in service and generate revenues.  Estimates are based on independent appraisals and the experience of our technical personnel.  We review the assets’ residual values and useful lives each year to determine whether they should be changed, and adjusted if appropriate.  To the extent that our estimates are incorrect, our periodic depreciation expense or carrying value of our assets may be impacted.

Under IFRS, we are required to test long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable for property, plant and equipment.  When the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount, the difference is accounted for as an impairment loss.  The recoverable amount is the higher of (1) the long-lived asset’s (asset group) fair value less costs to sell, representing the amount obtainable from the sale of the long-lived asset (asset group) in an arm’s length transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties less the costs of disposal and (2) the long-lived asset’s (asset group’s) value in use, representing its future cash flows discounted to present value by using a rate that reflects the current assessment of the time value of money and the risks specific to the long-lived asset (asset group) for which the cash flow estimates have not been adjusted.

The estimates of cash flows take into consideration expectations of future macroeconomic conditions as well as our internal strategic plans.  Therefore, inherent to the estimated future cash flows is a certain level of uncertainty which we have considered in our valuation; nevertheless, actual future results may differ.

36

Primarily as a result of plant rationalization, certain facilities and equipment are not currently in use in operations.  We have recorded impairment losses related to certain of those assets and additional losses may potentially occur in the future if our estimates are not accurate and/or future macroeconomic conditions differ significantly from those considered in our analysis.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives.  Management exercises judgment in assessing the useful lives of other intangible assets including patents and trademarks, customers lists and software for internal use.  Under IFRS, goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but are subject to impairment tests either annually or earlier in the case of a triggering event.

A key component of the impairment test is the identification of cash-generating units and the allocation of goodwill to such cash-generating units.  Estimates of fair value are primarily determined using discounted cash flows.  Cash flows are discounted at present value and an impairment loss is recognized if such discounted cash flows are lower than the net book value of the cash-generating units.

These estimates and assumptions could have a significant impact on whether or not an impairment charge is recognized and also the magnitude of any such charge.  We perform internal valuation analyses and consider relevant internal data as well as other market information that is publicly available.

This approach uses significant estimates and assumptions including projected future cash flows (including timing), a discount rate reflecting the risk inherent in future cash flows and a perpetual growth rate.  Inherent in these estimates and assumptions is a certain level of risk which we believe we have considered in our valuation.  Nevertheless, if future actual results differ from estimates, a possible impairment charge may be recognized in future periods related to the write-down of the carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets.

Deferred Income Tax

We record deferred income tax assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities.  If enacted tax rates change, we adjust the deferred tax assets and liabilities through the provision for income tax in the period of change, to reflect the enacted tax rate expected to be in effect when the deferred tax items reverse.  Under IFRS, a deferred tax asset must be recognized for all deductible temporary differences to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary difference can be utilized.  While we have considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies, in the event we were to determine that we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the future in excess of the net recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would increase income in the period such determination was made.  Should we determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax asset in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would be charged to income in the period such determination was made.

Derivative Financial Instruments

We use derivative financial instruments in the normal course of business, primarily to hedge certain operational and financial risks to which we are exposed, including without limitation: (i) future and options contracts for certain key production requirements like natural gas, heating oil and some raw materials such as corn and wheat, in order to minimize the cash flow variability due to price fluctuations; (ii) interest rate swaps, with the purpose of managing the interest rate risk related to our debt; and (iii) exchange rate contracts (mainly Mexican peso — U.S. dollar and in other currencies).

We account for derivative financial instruments used for hedging purposes either as cash-flow hedges or fair value hedges with changes in fair value reported in other comprehensive income and earnings, respectively.  Derivative financial instruments not designated as an accounting hedge are recognized at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized currently in income.

When available, we measure the fair value of the derivative financial instruments based on quoted market prices.  If quoted market prices are not available, we estimate the fair value of derivative financial instruments using industry standard valuation models.  When applicable, these models project future cash flows and discount the future amounts to a present value using market observable inputs, including interest rates and currency rates, among others.  Also included in the determination of the fair value of the Company’s liability positions is the Company’s own credit risk, which has been classified as an unobservable input.

37

Many of the factors used in measuring fair value are outside the control of management, and these assumptions and estimates may change in future periods.  Changes in assumptions or estimates may materially affect the fair value measurement of derivative financial instruments.

Employee Benefits

We recognize liabilities in our balance sheet and expenses in our income statement to reflect our obligations related to our post-employment benefits (retirement plan and seniority premium).  The amounts we recognize are determined on an actuarial basis that involve many estimates and accounts for these benefits in accordance with IFRS.

We use estimates in three specific areas that have a significant effect on these amounts: (a) the rate of increase in salaries that we assume we will observe in future years, (b) the discount rate that we use to calculate the present value of our future obligations and the expected returns on plan assets and (c) the expected rate of inflation.  The assumptions we have applied are identified in Note 19 to our audited consolidated financial statements.  These estimates are determined based on actuarial studies performed by independent experts using the projected unit credit method.  The latest actuarial computation was prepared as of December 31, 2013.  We review the estimates each year, and if we change them, our reported expense for post-employment benefits may increase or decrease according to market conditions.

Factors Affecting Financial Condition and Results of Operations

In recent years, our financial condition and results of operations have been significantly influenced by some or all of the following factors:

·the level of demand for tortillas, corn flour and wheat flour;

·the effects of government policies on imported and domestic corn prices in Mexico;

·the cost and availability of corn and wheat;

·the cost of energy and other related products;

·our acquisitions, plant expansions and divestitures;

·the effect of government initiatives and policies; and

·the effect from variations on interest rates and exchange rates.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table sets forth our consolidated income statement data on an IFRS basis for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, expressed as a percentage of net sales.  All financial information has been prepared in accordance with IFRS.  For a description of the method, see “Presentation of Financial Information” and “Item 5.  Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Overview of Accounting Presentation.”

	Year Ended December 31,
	2013		2012		2011
Income Statement Data
Net sales	100	%	100	%	100	%
Cost of sales	67.5		69.6		68.8
Gross profit	32.5		30.4		31.2
Selling and administrative expenses	23.2		25.1		25.8
Other expenses, net	(0.4	)	(0.2	)	(0.4	)
Operating income	8.9		5.2		5.0
Net comprehensive financing cost	(1.8	)	(1.5	)	(1.3	)
Current and deferred income taxes	0.4		1.6		3.3
Other items	—		—		9.7
(Loss) income from discontinued operations	(0.7	)	1.1		1.9
Non-controlling interest	0.3		1.1		1.1
Net income attributable to shareholders	5.8		2.0		10.9

38

The following table sets forth our net sales and operating income as represented by our principal subsidiaries for 2013, 2012 and 2011.  Net sales and operating income of our subsidiary PRODISA are part of “others and eliminations.” Financial information with respect to GIMSA includes sales of Ps.587 million, Ps.764 million and Ps.646 million in 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively, in corn flour to Gruma Corporation, Molinera de México, PRODISA and Gruma Centroamérica.  Financial information with respect to Molinera de México includes sales of Ps.277 million, Ps.207 million and Ps.127 million in 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively, to GIMSA, Gruma Corporation and PRODISA; financial information with respect to PRODISA includes sales of Ps.114 million, Ps.129 million and Ps.120 million in 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively, in tortilla related products to Gruma Corporation.

Financial information with respect to INTASA includes sales of Ps.727 million, Ps.961 million and Ps.1,032 million in 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively, in technological support to certain subsidiaries of Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V.  In the process of consolidation, all the aforementioned intercompany transactions are eliminated from the financial statements.

	Year Ended December 31,
	2013					2012					2011
	Net Sales		Operating Income			Net Sales		Operating Income			Net Sales		Operating Income
	(in millions of pesos)
Gruma Corporation	Ps.	27,801	Ps.	2,137		Ps.	26,932	Ps.	1,335		Ps.	24,098	Ps.	947
GIMSA	16,436		2,438			17,573		1,749			15,386		1,771
Molinera de México	4,983		99			5,046		87			4,633		104
Gruma Centroamérica	3,386		183			3,369		(40		)	3,180		(46		)
Others and eliminations	1,500		(26		)	1,489		(317		)	1,191		(349		)
Total	Ps.	54,106	Ps.	4,831		Ps.	54,409	Ps.	2,814		Ps.	48,488	Ps.	2,427

Net Sales by Subsidiary: By major subsidiary, the percentages of consolidated net sales in 2013, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

	Percentage of Consolidated Net Sales
Subsidiary	2013		2012		2011
Gruma Corporation	52	%	50	%	50	%
GIMSA	30		32		32
Molinera de México	9		9		10
Gruma Centroamérica	6		6		6
Others and eliminations	3		3		2

Year Ended December 31, 2013 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2012

Consolidated Results

GRUMA’s sales volume declined by 2% to 4,260 thousand metric tons in 2013 compared with 4,345 thousand metric tons in 2012. This decrease was driven mainly by GIMSA due especially to measures we implemented to prioritize margin expansion, among others.

Net sales decreased by 1% to Ps.54,106 million in 2013 compared with Ps.54,409 million in 2012. The increase in net sales at Gruma Corporation was offset mainly by a decrease in net sales at GIMSA. To a lesser extent, net sales declined due to lower net sales at foreign subsidiaries in peso terms reflecting the average peso appreciation.

Cost of sales decreased 4% to Ps.36,511 million in 2013 compared with Ps.37,849 million in 2012, due primarily to lower sales volume at GIMSA and lower raw material costs. Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales improved to 67.5% in 2013 from 69.6% in 2012 due to better performance at all subsidiaries, and particularly at GIMSA and Gruma Corporation.

Selling, general, and administrative expenses (SG&A) decreased by 8% to Ps.12,572 million in 2013 compared with Ps.13,645 million in 2012, due primarily to decreases at GIMSA and Other and Eliminations. SG&A as a percentage of net sales

39

decreased to 23.2% in 2013 from 25.1% in 2012, driven mainly by better expense absorption at Gruma Corporation and lower SG&A expenses at most subsidiaries, especially at GIMSA and Other and Eliminations. This resulted from our efforts to optimize marketing and administrative expenses as part of our strategy to enhance value creation.

Other expenses, net, were Ps.192 million in 2013 compared with Ps.101 million in 2012. The increase was primarily due to higher losses from the sale of fixed assets, higher impairment of long-lived assets and losses on derivative financial instruments compared with a gain in 2012.

GRUMA’s operating income increased by 72% to Ps.4,831 million in 2013 compared with Ps.2,814 million in 2012 due to a better operating performance at most subsidiaries, mostly in Gruma Corporation and GIMSA. Operating margin improved to 8.9% from 5.2% in 2012, due primarily to GIMSA and Gruma Corporation.

Net comprehensive financing cost was Ps.968 million in 2013 compared with Ps.827 million in 2012. The increase was due to higher interest expense in connection with higher debt related to GRUMA’s share buy-back in December 2012.

GRUMA’s equity in earnings of associated companies, net, represented income of Ps.3 million in 2013 and 2012.

Income Taxes decreased 77% to Ps.198 million in 2013 compared with Ps.863 million in 2012 primarily as a result of the implementation of several initiatives that allowed GRUMA to utilize tax loss carry-forwards, as well as tax recoveries from prior years. The effective tax rate was 5.1%.

Shareholders’ net income was Ps.3,163 million in 2013 compared with Ps.1,115 million in 2012 as a result of a better performance at most subsidiaries, especially in Gruma Corporation and GIMSA, the reduction in taxes and higher share ownership in the U.S. corn flour operations in connection with the share buy-back from ADM in December 2012.

Subsidiary Results

Gruma Corporation

Sales volume increased 4% to 1,651 thousand metric tons in 2013 compared with 1,594 thousand metric tons in 2012. This increase was driven by an unusually high level of sales of corn/grits at the European operations and, to a lesser extent, by higher sales at the U.S. corn flour operations.

Net sales increased by 3% to Ps.27,801 million in 2013, compared with Ps.26,932 million in 2012. The positive effect of price increases, change in the sales mix toward wheat tortillas and allowance reductions was offset by the average peso appreciation effect and by the effect of higher corn/grits sales volume at the European operations (which is priced significantly lower than the rest of Gruma Corporation’s product portfolio). Measured in dollar terms, net sales increased 6%.

Cost of sales increased by 1% to Ps.17,808 million in 2013 compared with Ps.17,655 million in 2012 due to sales volume growth, which was partially offset by the average peso appreciation effect. Measured in dollar terms, cost of sales increased 3%. As a percentage of net sales, cost of sales improved to 64.1% in 2013 from 65.6% because price increases more than compensated for higher costs (partially as a result of the Company’s hedging strategies), and also due to the shift toward high-margin products (as in the case of wheat tortillas) and allowance reduction.

SG&A decreased by 3% to Ps.7,738 million in 2013 compared with Ps.7,997 million in 2012 due mainly to the average peso appreciation effect. Higher expenses derived from the increase in sales volume and commissions (related to price increases) were more than offset by reductions and changes in personnel, marketing and advertising, and corporate expenses across the board, which reflected the company’s focus on profitability. Measured in dollar terms, SG&A decreased 1%. SG&A as a percentage of net sales improved to 27.8% in 2013 from 29.7% in 2012 reflecting better expense absorption and the aforementioned reductions.

Operating income increased by 60% to Ps.2,137 million in 2013 from Ps.1,335 million in 2012, and operating margin improved to 7.7% from 5.0%. Measured in dollar terms, operating income grew 61%.

40

GIMSA

Sales volume decreased by 7% to 1,852 thousand metric tons in 2013 compared with 1,983 thousand metric tons in 2012. The decrease was a result of measures the company implemented to prioritize margin expansion and tighten credit conditions coupled with a larger price differential between corn and corn flour, and lower sales to government channels, among others.

Net sales decreased by 6% to Ps.16,436 million in 2013 compared with Ps.17,573 million in 2012 due to sales volume reduction.

Cost of sales decreased by 11% to Ps.11,785 million in 2013 compared with Ps.13,171 million in 2012 due mainly to the sales volume reduction and lower corn costs. As a percentage of net sales, cost of sales improved to 71.7% in 2013 from 75.0% in 2012 due to lower corn costs and productivity improvements.

SG&A decreased by 16% to Ps.2,154 million in 2013 compared with Ps.2,574 million in 2012 and as a percentage of net sales decreased to 13.1% in 2013 from 14.6% in 2012 due mainly to reductions in marketing and advertising and, to a lesser extent, lower administrative expenses. These reductions were related to our efforts to enhance value creation. Also, freight expenses were lower as sales volume declined.

Operating income increased by 39% to Ps.2,438 million in 2013 from Ps.1,749 million in 2012, and operating margin increased to 14.8% from 10.0%.

Molinera de México

Sales volume decreased by 1% to 579 thousand metric tons in 2013 compared with 583 thousand metric tons in 2012. The decline was in line with the company’s focus on higher margin products that reduced some product presentations and also due to a difficult competitive environment.

Net sales decreased by 1% to Ps.4,983 million in 2013 compared with Ps.5,046 million in 2012. The decreased resulted from sales volume reduction.

Cost of sales decreased by 2% to Ps.4,189 million in 2013 compared with Ps.4,254 million in 2012 and, as a percentage of net sales, improved to 84.1% in 2013 from 84.3% in 2012, reflecting lower wheat, packaging and additive costs. In absolute terms, the decrease was also with the result of lower sales volume.

SG&A increased by 3% to Ps.692 million in 2013 compared with Ps.674 million in 2012. The rise was due mainly to higher freight expenses in connection with increased sales to retailers and other large food companies. SG&A as a percentage of net sales increased to 13.9% in 2013 from 13.4% in 2012 due to higher SG&A expenses and the reduction in net sales.

Operating income grew by 13% to Ps.99 million in 2013 from Ps.87 million in 2012 due to lower profit sharing. Operating margin increased to 2.0% in 2013 from 1.7% in 2012.

Gruma Centroamérica

Sales volume decreased by 4% to 198 thousand metric tons in 2013 compared with 207 thousand metric tons in 2012. The decrease was due mainly to the availability of cheap domestic corn (which motivated some customers to shift to the traditional method of tortilla production) and a tougher competitive environment from new and existing corn flour producers.

Net sales increased by 1% to Ps.3,386 million in 2013 from Ps.3,369 million in 2012 due to price increases and a change in the sales mix towards higher priced products such as snacks, hearts of palm and rice.

Cost of sales decreased by 6% to Ps.2,264 million in 2013 compared with Ps.2,415 million in 2012. This was due to the decline in sales volume, lower raw material costs, production efficiencies and the average peso appreciation effect during 2013. Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales improved to 66.9% in 2013 from 71.7% in 2012 due mainly to price increases, allowance reductions, lower raw material costs and, to a lesser extent, production efficiencies.

SG&A decreased by 5% to Ps.947 million in 2013 compared with Ps.994 million in 2012, due to our efforts to reduce expenses, mainly marketing and advertising, as well as to the average peso appreciation. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A improved to 28.0% in 2013 from 29.5% in 2012 due mainly to expense reductions.

41

Operating income was Ps.183 million in 2013 compared with a loss of Ps.40 million in 2012. Operating margin improved to 5.4% in 2013 from a negative 1.2% in 2012.

Year Ended December 31, 2012 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2011

Consolidated Results

GRUMA’s sales volume increased by 3% to 4,345 thousand metric tons in 2012 compared with 4,212 thousand metric tons in 2011. This increase was driven mainly by Gruma Corporation.

Net sales increased by 12% to Ps.54,409 million in 2012 compared with Ps.48,488 million in 2011. The increase was driven by Gruma Corporation and GIMSA. Net sales grew mostly in connection with price increases implemented to offset higher raw material costs, sales volume growth, and the average peso depreciation effect on Gruma Corporation during 2012. Sales from non-Mexican operations constituted 59% of consolidated net sales in 2012 and 59% in 2011.

Cost of sales increased by 13% to Ps.37,849 million in 2012 compared with Ps.33,371 million in 2011, due primarily to Gruma Corporation and GIMSA. The increase was associated with higher raw material costs, sales volume growth, and the average peso depreciation effect on Gruma Corporation. Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales increased to 69.6% in 2012 from 68.8% in 2011 due primarily to GIMSA and Gruma Corporation, as raw material cost increases were not fully reflected in our product prices.

Selling, general, and administrative expenses (SG&A) increased by 9% to Ps.13,645 million in 2012 compared with Ps.12,486 million in 2011, due primarily to Gruma Corporation and, to a lesser extent, GIMSA. Part of the consolidated increase in SG&A resulted from the average peso depreciation effect on Gruma Corporation. SG&A as a percentage of net sales decreased to 25.1% in 2012 from 25.8% in 2011, driven mainly by better expense absorption at Gruma Corporation and GIMSA.

Other expenses, net, were Ps.101 million in 2012 compared with Ps.204 million in 2011. The decrease was primarily due to lower impairment of long-lived assets and lower losses from the sale of fixed assets during 2012.

GRUMA’s operating income increased by 16% to Ps.2,814 million in 2012 compared with Ps.2,427 in 2011 driven by Gruma Corporation.

Net comprehensive financing cost increased by 32% to Ps.827 million in 2012 compared with Ps.627 million in 2011. The change was because in 2011 the company had gains on foreign exchange rate hedging related to corn procurement as well as gains on raw material hedging; also, the company registered foreign exchange losses of Ps.82 million in 2012 resulting mostly from the average peso depreciation as opposed to a Ps.41.2 million gain in 2011. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects —Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects —Liquidity and Capital Resources—Market Risk.”

GRUMA’s equity in earnings of associated companies, net, represented income of Ps.3 million in 2012 compared with income of Ps.4,711 million in 2011 primarily derived from the gain on the sale of GRUMA’s stake in GFNorte during February 2011.

Income Taxes decreased by 47% to Ps.863 million in 2012 compared with Ps.1,618 million in 2011 primarily as a result of taxes related to the gain on the sale of GRUMA’s stake in GFNorte during 2011. The effective tax rate was 43%.

GRUMA’s net income was Ps.1.704 million in 2012 compared with Ps.5,816 million in 2011. Net income attributable to shareholders was Ps.1,115 million compared with Ps.5,271 million in 2011. Both declines were caused by the gain on the sale of GRUMA’s stake in GFNorte during 2011.

Subsidiary Results

Gruma Corporation

Sales volume increased 8% to 1,594 thousand metric tons in 2012 compared with 1,478 thousand metric tons in 2011. This increase was due mainly to several acquisitions made throughout 2011, in particular the acquisition of the leading corn grits company in Turkey, and organic growth at the European operations especially in connection with new and increased customer accounts.

42

Net sales increased by 12% to Ps.26,932 million in 2012, compared with Ps.24,098 million in 2011. The increase was driven mostly by the aforementioned sales volume growth and the average peso depreciation effect. Measured in dollar terms, net sales increased 7% in connection with sales volume growth. The effect of price increases implemented toward the end of 2011 (in connection with higher raw material costs) and also towards the end of 2012, and allowance reductions in the U.S. tortilla business, were offset mainly by the change in the sales mix towards corn grits in Europe.

Cost of sales increased by 14% to Ps.17,655 million in 2012 compared with Ps.15,454 million in 2011 due to sales volume growth, higher raw material cost and overhead and health insurance costs, as well as the average peso depreciation effect. Measured in dollar terms, cost of sales increased 11%. As a percentage of net sales, cost of sales increased to 65.6% in 2012 from 64.1% because higher raw material costs were not fully reflected in our product prices and also due to a change in the sales mix towards foodservice products in the U.S. tortilla business and towards corn grits in Europe.

SG&A increased by 8% to Ps.7,996 million in 2012 compared with Ps.7,436 million in 2011 due mainly to the average peso depreciation effect, sales volume growth and higher sales commissions related to price increases. Measured in dollar terms, SG&A increased 2%. SG&A as a percentage of net sales improved to 29.7% in 2012 from 30.9% in 2011 in connection with better expense absorption.

Operating income increased by 41% to Ps.1,335 million in 2012 from Ps.947 million in 2011, and operating margin improved to 5% from 4% due to a favorable comparison of Ps.143 million in other expenses because in 2011 the company generated losses from asset disposals. Measured in dollar terms, operating income grew 34%. Operating margin also improved in connection with better expense absorption.

GIMSA

Sales volume increased by 1% to 1,983 thousand metric tons in 2012 compared with 1,959 thousand metric tons in 2011. The increase was a result of higher sales of non-corn flour products as higher grain prices motivated consumption of byproducts for animal feed.

Net sales increased by 14% to Ps.17,573 million in 2012 compared with Ps.15,386 million in 2011 due mainly to price increases related to higher corn costs.

Cost of sales increased by 17% to Ps.13,171 million in 2012 compared with Ps.11,284 million in 2011 due mainly to higher corn costs. As a percentage of net sales, cost of sales increased to 75% in 2012 from 73.3% in 2011 due to the aforementioned rise in corn costs, which were not fully absorbed through price increases, and the mathematical effect of having a larger base of sales with similar amounts of gross profit per ton.

SG&A increased by 13% to Ps.2,574 million in 2012 compared with Ps.2,286 million in 2011. The increase resulted mainly from higher promotion and advertising expenses related mostly to sponsorship of the Mexican Football Federation, the continued strengthening of several programs aimed at attracting traditional tortilla makers, higher sales commissions due to price increases and higher freight expenses coming from higher tariffs and intercompany shipments due to capacity constraints at some plants. SG&A as a percentage of net sales decreased to 14.6% in 2012 from 14.9% in 2011 due to better expense absorption.

Operating income decreased by 1% to Ps.1,749 million in 2012 from Ps.1,771 million in 2011, and operating margin decreased to 10% from 11.5%. The reduction in absolute terms resulted from the higher SG&A and higher other expenses in connection with losses on natural gas hedging. Profit sharing also increased during 2012. Operating margin declined mostly from the aforementioned mathematical effect of having a larger base of sales with a similar level of gross profit per ton.

Molinera de México

Sales volume increased by 3% to 583 thousand metric tons in 2012 compared with 564 thousand metric tons in 2011. This increase was driven by greater consumption of premixed flours at supermarket in-store bakeries, supermarket expansion through more stores, and customers’ recovery.

Net sales increased by 9% to Ps.5,046 million in 2012 compared with Ps.4,633 million in 2011. The rise resulted from price increases implemented to reflect the higher cost of wheat, a change in the sales mix towards pre-mixed flours, higher byproduct prices in connection with low supply in the market, and sales volume growth.

43

Cost of sales increased by 9% to Ps.4,254 million in 2012 compared with Ps.3,894 million in 2011 mainly in connection with the higher wheat costs and sales volume growth. As a percentage of net sales, cost of sales increased to 84.3% in 2012 from 84% in 2011due to higher wheat costs, which were not fully reflected in our product prices.

SG&A increased by 7% to Ps.674 million in 2012 compared with Ps.631 million in 2011. The increase was due mainly to higher freight expenses in connection with higher tariffs and intercompany shipments related to capacity constraints at some plants and, to a lesser extent, to sales volume growth. SG&A as a percentage of net sales decreased to 13.4% in 2012 from 13.6% in 2011 due to better expense absorption.

Operating income decreased by 16% to Ps.87 million in 2012 from Ps.104 million in 2011 due to the aforementioned rise in SG&A and increases in other expenses related to higher profit sharing. Operating margin decreased to 1.7% in 2012 from 2.2% in 2011 due to the aforementioned rise in profit sharing.

Gruma Centroamérica

Sales volume decreased by 9% to 207 thousand metric tons in 2012 compared with 229 thousand metric tons in 2011. The decrease was due mainly to the availability of cheap domestic corn, which motivated some customers to shift to the traditional method of tortilla production. This availability rose significantly during 2012 in connection with the increasing popularity of genetically modified corn. Additionally, during 2011 sales volume benefitted from a shortage of corn within the region due to bad weather conditions that affected corn crops, which at that time encouraged the conversion from the traditional method of making tortillas to the corn flour method.

Net sales increased by 6% to Ps.3,369 million in 2012 from Ps.3,180 million in 2011 due mainly to price increases and the effect of the average peso depreciation during 2012.

Cost of sales increased by 2% to Ps.2,415 million in 2012 compared with Ps.2,368 million in 2011, due mainly to the aforementioned average peso depreciation. Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales decreased to 71.7% in 2012 from 74.5% in 2011 due mainly to the aforementioned price increases.

SG&A rose by 16% to Ps.994 million in 2012 compared with Ps.858 million in 2011, due to higher sales commissions, and salaries, as well as the strengthening of the sales department and the effect of the average peso depreciation. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A increased to 29.5% in 2012 from 27% in 2011 due to the aforementioned increase in expenses.

Operating loss was Ps.40 million in 2012 compared with a loss of Ps.46 million in 2011, and operating margin improved to a negative 1.2% in 2012 from a negative 1.5% in 2011 principally in connection with the price increases.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

We fund our liquidity and capital resource requirements, in the ordinary course of business, through a variety of sources, including:

·cash generated from operations;

·committed and uncommitted short-term and long-term lines of credit;

·occasional offerings of medium- and long-term debt; and

·sales of our equity securities and those of our subsidiaries and affiliates from time to time.

The following is a summary of the principal sources and uses of cash for the three years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.

	2013			2012			2011
	(thousands of Mexican pesos )
Resources provided by (used in):
Operating activities	Ps.	6,679,431		Ps.	1,806,136		Ps.	1,751,314
From continuing operations	7,036,747			1,127,013			1,562,536
From discontinued operations	(357,316		)	679,123			188,778
Financing activities	(5,112,396		)	1,817,675			(7,429,059		)
From continuing operations	(5,112,396		)	2,134,571			(7,423,706		)
From discontinued operations	—			(316,896		)	(5,353		)
Investing activities	(1,524,901		)	(3,455,629		)	6,779,129
From continuing operations	(1,321,074		)	(3,398,981		)	6,819,492
From discontinued operations	(203,827		)	(56,648		)	(40,363		)

44

During 2013, net cash generated from operations was Ps.6,679 million after changes in working capital of Ps.31 million, of which Ps.329 million was due to a decrease in accounts receivable, Ps.2,203 million reflected a decrease in inventory, Ps.1,539 million reflected a decrease in accounts payable, Ps.1,012 million reflected an increase in income tax paid and Ps.357 million net cash used by discontinued operations. Net cash used for financing activities during 2013 was Ps.5,112 million, of which Ps.15,877 million reflected payments of debt and Ps.12,362 million of proceeds from borrowings, Ps.995 million in cash interest payments and Ps.594 million of dividends paid to minority shareholders of GIMSA. Cash used for investment activities during 2013 reflected cash expenditures of Ps.1,525 million of which Ps.1,468 million were applied to general manufacturing upgrades and efficiency improvements in our subsidiaries in the U.S. and Mexico and Ps.204 million net cash used by discontinued operations.  As of December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, there were no significant restricted net assets of the consolidated subsidiaries of the Company, as defined by Rule 4-08(e)(3) of Regulation S-X.

Factors that could decrease our sources of liquidity include a significant decrease in the demand for, or price of, our products, each of which could limit the amount of cash generated from operations, and a lowering of our corporate credit rating or any other credit downgrade, which could impair our liquidity and increase our costs with respect to new debt and cause our stock price to suffer.  Our liquidity is also affected by factors such as the depreciation or appreciation of the peso and changes in interest rates.  See “Item 5.Operating and Financial Review and Prospects —Indebtedness.”

As further described below, Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. is subject to financial covenants contained in its debt agreements which require it to maintain certain financial ratios and balances on a consolidated basis, among other limitations.  Gruma Corporation is also subject to financial covenants contained in one of its debt agreements which require it to maintain certain financial ratios and balances on a consolidated basis.  A default under any of our existing debt obligations for borrowed money could result in acceleration of the due dates for payment of the amounts owing thereunder and, in certain cases, in a cross-default under some of our existing credit agreements and the indenture governing our perpetual bonds.  See “Item 10.  Additional Information—Material Contracts.”

Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. and its consolidated subsidiaries are required to maintain a leverage ratio no greater than 4.50:1, and an interest coverage ratio no lower than 2.5:1.  As of December 31, 2013, Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V.’s leverage ratio was 2.51:1, and the interest coverage ratio was 5.89:1.  The amount of interest that Gruma Corporation pays on its debt may increase if its overall leverage ratio increases above 1.0:1.  See “Item 5.  Operating and Financial Review and Prospects —Indebtedness.” As of December 31, 2013, Gruma Corporation’s leverage ratio was 0.99:1, therefore the applicable interest rate range under the Gruma Corporation Loan Facility is LIBOR + 137 bp.

The Primary Shareholder Group may pledge part of its shares in us to secure any future borrowings.  If there is a default and the lenders enforce their rights against any or all of these shares, the Primary Shareholder Group could lose control over us and a change of control could result.  This could trigger a default in some of our credit agreements and the indenture governing our perpetual bonds outstanding, all together, in an aggregate principal amount of U.S.$ 983.5 million as of December 31, 2013, and have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.  For more information about this pledge, see “Item 7.  Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions.”

Our long-term corporate credit rating and our senior unsecured perpetual bond are rated BB+ by Standard & Poor’s.  Our Foreign Currency Long-Term Issuer Default Rating and our Local Currency Long-Term Issuer Default Rating are rated BB+ by Fitch.  Our U.S.$300 million perpetual bond is rated BB+ by Fitch.  On December 14 2012, after the announcement of the ADM Transaction and Gruma’s increase in its leverage, Standard & Poor’s confirmed its BB credit rating and the outlook remains stable. On December 17, 2012, Fitch also confirmed its BB rating.  Fitch and Standard & Poor’s upgraded the BB rating to “BB+” on December 11, 2013 and March 4, 2014, respectively.

If our financial condition deteriorates, we may experience future declines in our credit ratings, with attendant consequences.  Our access to external sources of financing, as well as the cost of that financing, has been and may continue to be adversely affected by a deterioration of our long-term debt ratings.  A downgrade in our credit ratings may continue to increase the cost of and/or limit the availability of unsecured financing, which may make it more difficult for us to raise capital when necessary.  If we cannot obtain adequate capital on favorable terms, or at all, our business, operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected.

45

However, management believes that its working capital and available external sources of financing are sufficient for our present requirements.

Indebtedness

Our indebtedness bears interest at fixed and floating rates.  As of December 31, 2013, approximately 23.7% of our outstanding indebtedness bore interest at fixed rates and approximately 76.3% bore interest at floating rates, with almost all U.S. dollar and Mexican peso floating-rate indebtedness bearing interest based on LIBOR and TIIE, respectively.  From time to time, we partially hedge both our interest rate exposure and our foreign exchange rate exposure as discussed below.  For more information about our interest rate and foreign exchange rate exposures, see “Item 11.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”

As of December 31, 2013, we had total outstanding long-term debt aggregating approximately Ps.13.353 million (approximately U.S.$ 1,021 million).  Approximately 71% of our long-term debt at such date was dollar-denominated, and 29% denominated in Mexican Pesos.

Perpetual Bonds

On December 3, 2004, Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. issued U.S.$300 million 7.75% senior unsecured perpetual bonds, which at the time were rated BBB- by Standard & Poor’s and by Fitch.  The bonds which have no fixed final maturity date, have a call option exercisable by GRUMA at any time beginning five years after the issue date. As of December 31, 2013 we have not hedged any interest payments on our U.S.$300 million 7.75% senior unsecured perpetual bonds.

Credit Facilities

On June 16, 2011, we concluded a series of transactions, where we entered into the Syndicated Loan Facility, the Peso Syndicated Loan Facility, the Rabobank Loan Facility and the 2011 Bancomext Peso Facility (as defined below).  Additionally, on June 20, 2011 we refinanced and extended the Gruma Corporation Loan Facility.  See “Item 5.  Operating and Financial Review and Prospects —Indebtedness” below for a description of our current principal debt instruments.

During the fourth quarter of 2012 we entered into a short term-unsecured loan in an amount of US $300 million with Goldman Sachs and Santander; and Gruma Corporation increased the aggregate commitment under its Revolving Loan Agreement (as defined below) for an additional amount of US $50 million in order to partially fund the ADM Transaction. The additional U.S. $100 million required to fund the ADM Transaction was obtained through a short term-unsecured loan with Banco Inbursa (all together, the “2012 Bridge Loan Facility”).

Rabobank Syndicated Facility

In June 2013, the Company obtained a 5-year Syndicated Credit Facility for U.S.$220 million with Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen Boerenleenbank B.A., “Rabobank Nederland”, New York Branch, as administrative agent, with an average term of 4.2 years and amortizations starting on December 2014. This facility has an interest rate based on LIBOR plus a spread between 150 and 300 basis points based on the Company’s leverage ratio. BBVA Bancomer, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero BBVA Bancomer and Bank of America, N.A., also participated in this facility (the “Rabobank Syndicated Facility”).  The Rabobank Syndicated Facility contains covenants that require us to maintain a ratio of consolidated EBITDA to interest charges of not less than 2.5:1, and to maintain a maximum ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA of not more than 4.75:1 from June 18, 2013 until September 30, 2013; 4.50:1 from October 1, 2013 until September 30, 2014; 4.0:1 from October 1, 2014 until September 30, 2015; and 3.5:1 from October 1, 2015 and thereafter. The Rabobank Syndicated Facility also limits our ability, and our subsidiaries’ ability in certain cases, among other things to, create liens, make certain investments, merge or consolidate with other companies or sell substantially all of our assets, make certain restricted payments, enter into agreements that prohibit the payment of dividends, engage in transactions with affiliates and enter into certain hedging transactions. Aditionally, the Rabobank Syndicated Facility limits our subsidiaries’ ability to guarantee additional indebtedness and to incur additional indebtedness under certain circumstances.

Inbursa Pesos Syndicated Facility

In June 2013, the Company obtained a 5-year Syndicated Credit Facility for Ps.2,300 million with Inbursa, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero Inbursa, as administrative agent, with an average term of 4.2 years and amortizations starting on December 2014. The facility has an interest rate of 91-day TIIE plus a spread between 162.5 and 262.5 basis points based on the Company’s leverage ratio. Banco Nacional de Comercio Exterior, S.N.C., Banca de Desarrollo and HSBC México, S.A., Institución

46

de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero HSBC, also participated in this facility (the “Inbursa Peso Syndicated Facility”). The Inbursa Peso Syndicated Facility contains covenants that require us to maintain a ratio of consolidated EBITDA to interest charges of not less than 2.5:1, and to maintain a maximum ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA of not more than 4.75:1 from June 12, 2013 until September 30, 2013; 4.50:1 from October 1, 2013 until September 30, 2014; 4.0:1 from October 1, 2014 until September 30, 2015; and 3.5:1 from October 1, 2015 and thereafter. This facility also limits our ability, and our subsidiaries’ ability in certain cases, among other things to, create liens, make certain investments; merge or consolidate with other companies or sell substantially all of our assets, make certain restricted payments, enter into agreements that prohibit the payment of dividends, engage in transactions with affiliates and enter into certain hedging transactions. Aditionally, the Inbursa Peso Syndicated Facility limits our subsidiaries’ ability to guarantee certain additional indebtedness and to incur additional indebtedness under certain circumstances.

The proceeds of this transaction as well as proceeds from the Rabobank Syndicated Facility were applied to make the partial payment on the 2012 Bridge Loan Facilty for the amount of U.S.$400 million. The remaining U.S.$50 million corresponds to the increase in the Gruma Corporation Loan Facility which remains outstanding.

Gruma Corporation Loan Facility

In October 2006, Gruma Corporation entered into a U.S.$100 million 5-year revolving credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions, which was refinanced and extended to U.S.$200 million for an additional 5-year term on June 20, 2011, (the “Gruma Corporation Loan Facility”).  The facility, as refinanced in 2011, has an interest rate based on LIBOR plus a spread of 1.375% to 2% that fluctuates in relation to Gruma Corporations’ leverage and contains less restrictive provisions than those in the facility replaced.  In November, 2012 we increased the aggregate commitment under this facility up to the maximum permitted amount of US $250,000,000.  The additional US $50,000,000 were used by Gruma Corporation to cover part of the purchase price under the ADM Transaction, specifically the purchase of ADM’s stake in Azteca Milling. This facility contains covenants that limit Gruma Corporation’s ability to merge or consolidate, and require it to maintain a ratio of total funded debt to consolidated EBITDA of not more than 3.0:1.  In addition, this facility limits Gruma Corporation’s, and certain of its subsidiaries’ ability, among other things, to create liens; make certain investments; make certain restricted payments; enter into any agreements that prohibit the payment of dividends; and engage in transactions with affiliates.  This facility also limits Gruma Corporation’s subsidiaries’ ability to incur additional debt.

Gruma Corporation is also subject to covenants which limit the amounts that may be advanced to, loaned to, or invested in us under certain circumstances.  Upon the occurrence of any default or event of default under its credit agreements, Gruma Corporation generally would be prohibited from making any cash dividend payments to us.  The covenants described above and other covenants could limit our and Gruma Corporation’s ability to help support our liquidity and capital resource requirements

Syndicated Loan Facility

On March 22, 2011 we obtained a U.S.$225 million, five-year senior credit facility through a syndicate of banks (the “Syndicated Loan Facility”).  The Syndicated Loan Facility consists of a term loan (“Term Loan Facility”) and a revolving loan facility (the “Revolving Loan Facility”).  Prior to the execution of the 2012 Bridge Loan Facility mentioned above, the permitted leverage ratio established under the Syndicated Loan Facility was increased, and the interest rate grid was also modified, among other revisions made through the execution of an amendment dated December 3, 2012. After such amendment, the interest rate for the Term Loan Facility and for the Revolving Loan Facility is either (i) LIBOR or (ii) an interest rate determined by the administrative agent based on its “prime rate” or the federal funds rate, respectively, plus, in either case, (a) 3.00% if the Company’s ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA (the “Maximum Leverage Ratio”) is greater than or equal to 4.5x, (b) 2.75% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 4.0x and less than 4.5x, (c) 2.50% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 3.5x and less than 4.0x; (d) 2.25% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 3.0x and less than 3.5x; (e) 2.00% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 2.5x and less than 3.0x; (f) 1.75% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 2.0x and less than 2.5x; and (g) 1.50% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is less than 2.0x.  The Syndicated Loan Facility (as amended) contains covenants that require the Company to maintain a ratio of consolidated EBITDA to interest charges of not less than 2.5:1, and a Maximum Leverage Ratio of not more than 4.75:1 from December 4, 2012 until September 30, 2013; 4.50:1 from October 1, 2013 until September 30, 2014; 4.0:1 from October 1, 2014 until September 30, 2015; and 3.5:1 from October 1, 2015 and thereafter.  The Syndicated Loan Facility (as amended) also limits our ability, and our subsidiaries’ ability in certain cases, among other things, to: create liens; make certain investments or other restricted payments; merge or consolidate with other companies or sell substantially all of our assets; and enter into certain hedging transactions.  Additionally, the Syndicated Loan Facility (as amended) limits our subsidiaries’ ability to guarantee additional indebtedness issued by the Company and to incur additional indebtedness under certain circumstances.

47

Peso Syndicated Loan Facility

On June 15, 2011 we obtained a Ps.1,200 million, seven-year senior credit facility through a syndicate of banks (the “Peso Syndicated Loan Facility”).  The Peso Syndicated Loan Facility consists of a term loan maturing in June 2018 with yearly principal amortizations beginning in December 2015. Prior to the execution of the 2012 Bridge Loan Facility mentioned above, the permitted leverage ratio established under the Peso Syndicated Loan Facility was increased, and the interest rate grid was also modified, among other revisions made through the execution of an amendment dated December 3, 2012. After such amendment, the interest rate payable under the Peso Syndicated Loan Facility is the 91-day TIIE plus a spread between 137.5 and 262.5 basis points based on the Company’s ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA.  The Peso Syndicated Loan Facility (as amended) contains covenants that require the Company to maintain a ratio of consolidated EBITDA to interest charges of not less than 2.5:1, and to maintain a Maximum ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA of not more than 4.75:1 from December 4, 2012 until September 30, 2013; 4.50:1 from October 1, 2013 until September 30, 2014; 4.0:1 from October 1, 2014 until September 30, 2015; and 3.5:1 from October 1, 2015 and thereafter. The Peso Syndicated Loan Facility (as amended) also limits our ability, and our subsidiaries’ ability in certain cases, among other things, to: create liens; make certain investments or other restricted payments; merge or consolidate with other companies or sell substantially all of our assets; and enter into certain hedging transactions.  Additionally, the Peso Syndicated Loan Facility (as amended) limits our subsidiaries’ ability to guarantee additional indebtedness issued by the Company and to incur additional indebtedness under certain circumstances.

Rabobank Revolving Facility

On June 15, 2011 we obtained a U.S.$50 million, five-year senior credit facility from Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (the “Rabobank Loan Facility”). On June 28, 2012, this facility was increased by U.S.$50 million to a total principal amount of U.S. $100 million.  Also, prior to the execution of the 2012 Bridge Loan Facility, the permitted leverage ratio established under the Rabobank Loan Facility was increased, and the interest rate grid was modified, among other revisions made through the execution of an amendment dated November 29, 2012. After such amendments, the Rabobank Loan Facility consists of a revolving loan facility, at an interest rate of LIBOR plus (a) 3.00% if the Company’s ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA is greater than or equal to 4.5x, (b) 2.75% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 4.0x and less than 4.5x, (c) 2.50% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 3.5x and less than 4.0x; (d) 2.25% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 3.0x and less than 3.5x; (e) 2.00% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 2.5x and less than 3.0x; (f) 1.75% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 2.0x and less than 2.5x; and (g) 1.50% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is less than 2.0x.  The Rabobank Loan Facility (as amended) contains covenants that require the Company to maintain a ratio of consolidated EBITDA to interest charges of not less than 2.5:1, and a Maximum Leverage Ratio of not more than 4.75:1 from December 4, 2012 until September 30, 2013; 4.50:1 from October 1, 2013 until September 30, 2014; 4.0:1 from October 1, 2014 until September 30, 2015; and 3.5:1 from October 1, 2015 and thereafter. The Rabobank Loan Facility (as amended) also limits our ability, and our subsidiaries’ ability in certain cases, among other things, to: create liens; make certain investments or other restricted payments; merge or consolidate with other companies or sell substantially all of our assets; and enter into certain hedging transactions.  Additionally, the Rabobank Loan Facility (as amended) limits our subsidiaries’ ability to guarantee additional indebtedness issued by the Company and to incur additional indebtedness under certain circumstances.

2011 Bancomext Peso Facility

On June 16, 2011 we obtained a Ps.600 million, seven-year senior credit facility from Bancomext (Banco Nacional de Comercio Exterior) (the “2011 Bancomext Peso Facility”).  Prior to the execution of the 2012 Bridge Loan Facility mentioned above, the permitted leverage ratio established under the 2011 Bancomext Peso Facility was increased, and the interest rate grid was modified, among other revisions made through the execution of an amendment dated December 7, 2012. After such amendment, the 2011 Bancomext Peso Facility consists of a term loan maturing in June 2018 at an interest rate of 91-day TIIE plus a spread between 137.5 and 262.5 basis points based on the Company’s ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA.  The 2011 Bancomext Peso Facility contains a covenant that requires us to maintain a ratio of consolidated EBITDA to interest charges of not less than 2.5:1 as well as a covenant that requires us to maintain a maximum ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA of not more than 4.75:1 from December 8, 2012 until September 30, 2013; 4.50:1 from October 1, 2013 until September 30, 2014; 4.0:1 from October 1, 2014 until September 30, 2015; and 3.5:1 from October 1, 2015 and thereafter.  The 2011 Bancomext Peso Facility also limits our ability, and our subsidiaries’ ability in certain cases to create liens.

On December 8, 2012 we entered into an amendment to this Facility in order to increase the existing permitted Leverage Ratio from December 8, 2012 until September 30, 2013, to equal or less than 4.75x; from October 1, 2013 until September 30, 2014, to equal or less than 4.5x; from October 1, 2014 until September 30, 2015, to equal or less than 4.0x and from October 1, 2015 and thereafter, to equal or less than 3.5x.

48

Other Information

Our credit agreements currently in force and mentioned above contain event of default provisions, which include: (i) non-payment default regarding principal or interests; (ii) cross default and cross acceleration in connection with any other indebtedness of the Company; (iii) affirmative and negative covenants default; (iv) declaration or request of bankruptcy, liquidation or proceedings seeking concurso mercantil; (v) delivery of false or incorrect material information; and (vi) changes of control in the Company. The aforementioned events of default are applicable pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in such credit agreements, including without limitation certain exceptions and baskets and cure periods. For further details please review the text of our credit agreements attached hereto. Please see “Item 19 — Exhibits”.

As of December 31, 2013 we were in compliance with all of the covenants and obligations under our existing debt agreements.

As of December 31, 2013, the Company had committed lines of credit for the amount of U.S.$425 million from banks in Mexico and the United States of which we have drawn U.S.$ 80 million dollars.

As of December 31, 2013, we had total cash and cash equivalents of Ps.1,339 million.

The following table presents our amortization requirements with respect to our total indebtedness as of December 31, 2013.

Year	In Millions of U.S. Dollars
2014	250.3
2015	73.9
2016	253.1
2017	121.3
2018 and thereafter	572.8
Total	1,271.5

The following table sets forth our ratios of consolidated debt to total capitalization (i.e., consolidated debt plus total stockholders’ equity) and consolidated liabilities to total stockholders’ equity as of the dates indicated.  For purposes of these ratios, consolidated debt includes short-term debt.

Date	Ratio of Consolidated Debt to Total Capitalization	Ratio of Consolidated Liabilities to Total Stockholders’ Equity
December 31, 2011	0.43	1.51
December 31, 2012	0.58	2.45
December 31, 2013	0.53	1.95

Capital Expenditures

Our capital expenditure program continues to be primarily focused on our core businesses and markets.  Capital expenditures for 2011, 2012 and 2013 were U.S.$188 million, U.S.$197 million and U.S.$114 million, respectively.  During 2011, capital expenditures were primarily applied to production capacity expansions, manufacturing and technology upgrades, particularly in the U.S., Mexico and Europe.  We also made certain acquisitions throughout 2011, including the purchase of the leading producer of corn grits in Turkey, two tortilla plants in the U.S. and the leading tortilla manufacturer in Russia. During 2012 and 2013, capital expenditures were applied primarily to production capacity expansions, general manufacturing and technology upgrades in Gruma Corporation and GIMSA.

We have budgeted approximately U.S.$ 160 million for capital expenditures in 2014, which we intend to use mainly for production capacity expansions, general manufacturing and technology upgrades, especially in Gruma Corporation and GIMSA.  We anticipate financing these expenditures throughout the year through internally generated funds and debt.

49

Concentration of Credit Risk

Our regular operations expose us to potential defaults when our suppliers and counterparties are unable to comply with their financial or other commitments.  We seek to mitigate this risk by entering into transactions with a diverse pool of counterparties.  However, we continue to remain subject to unexpected third party financial failures that could disrupt our operations.

We are also exposed to risk in connection with our cash management activities and temporary investments, and any disruption that affects our financial intermediaries could also adversely affect our operations.

Our exposure to risk due to trade receivables is limited given the large number of our customers located in different parts of Mexico, the United States, Central America, Europe, Asia and Oceania. However, we still maintain reserves for potential credit losses. The severe political and economic situation in Venezuela presents a risk to our discontinued operations that we cannot control and that cannot be accurately measured or estimated.  For example, the Venezuelan government devalued its currency and established a two tier exchange structure on January 11, 2010.  Pursuant to Exchange Agreement No.14, the official exchange rate of the Venezuelan bolivar (“Bs.”) was devalued from Bs.2.15 to each U.S. dollar to Bs.4.30 for non-essential goods and services and to Bs.2.60 for essential goods.  However, effective January 4, 2011, the fixed exchange rate became 4.30 bolivars for all goods and services. On February 8, 2013, the National Executive, through the Central Bank of Venezuela and the Ministry of Popular Power for Planning and Finance, amended the Exchange Agreement to the effect that an exchange rate of 6.30 bolivars per U.S. dollar is applicable to all operations conducted in foreign currency effective as of February 9, 2013. In March 2013, the Venezuelan government announced the creation of an alternative exchange mechanism called the Supplementary System of Foreign Exchange Administration (Sistema Complementario de Administración de Divisas, SICAD). The SICAD operates as an auction system that allows entities in specific sectors to buy foreign currency for imports. This is not a free auction (that is, the counterpart that offers the highest price does not necessarily have the right to receive the foreign currency). Each auction may have different rules (for example, the minimum and maximum amount of foreign currency that may be offered to exchange). Limited amounts of dollars are available and entities do not commonly get the full amount for which they entered in auction. During December 2013, the Venezuelan government authorized the Central Bank of Venezuela to publish the average exchange rate resulting of SICAD auctions. During the weeks commencing on December 23 and December 30, 2013, the Central Bank of Venezuela published on its website the average exchange rate for auctions No.13 and No.14 (11.30 Venezuelan bolivars per U.S. dollar).

On January 24, 2014, Exchange Agreement No. 25 became effective, which establishes the concepts to which the SICAD exchange rate (11.30 Venezuelan bolivars per U.S. dollar) applies, for sale of foreign currency operations. In addition, the agreement also provides that the sale operation of foreign currency, whose clearance has been requested to the Central Bank of Venezuela before the Exchange Agreement No. 25 became effective, will be settled at the exchange rate effective on the date on which such operations were authorized. This Exchange Agreement No.25 will result in a net foreign exchange loss of Ps.142,079 to us in 2014, which will be presented as discontinued operations, this exchange loss is originated by certain accounts receivable maintained with the Venezuelan companies as of December 31, 2013 which are expected to be settled at this new exchange rate rate (11.30 Venezuelan bolivars per U.S. dollar). The only mechanism available to obtain foreign currency to remit dividends outside of Venezuela is the CADIVI. Obtaining foreign currency (U.S. dollars) to pay dividends outside of Venezuela in the past five years has not been authorized. Accordingly, it is important to consider which exchange rate is more appropriate when required to remit cash flows outside of Venezuela.

On May 12, 2010, the Republic published in the Expropriation Decree, which announced the forced acquisition of all goods, movables and real estate of MONACA. The Republic has expressed to GRUMA’s representatives that the Expropriation Decree extends to DEMASECA. On January 22, 2013, the Ministry of Popular Power for Internal Relations published a Providence designating Special Managers with the power to run MONACA and DEMASECA. As a consequence, we have determined that we lost control of the Venezuelan Companies as of that date. We have deconsolidated the Venezuelan Companies as of January 22, 2013 and report them as a discontinued operation.

From time to time, we enter into currency and other derivative transactions that cover varying periods of time and have varying pricing provisions.  Our credit exposure on derivatives contracts is primarily to professional counterparties in the financial sector, arising from transactions with banks, investment banks and other financial institutions.  As of December 31, 2013, our Company had foreign exchange derivative transactions in a nominal amount of U.S.$65 million, with maturity during January 2014. As of March 31, 2014, the Company had foreign exchange derivatives transactions in effect for a nominal amount of U.S.$ 27 million.  See “Item 11.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—Foreign Exchange Rate Risk.”

Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of loss generated by fluctuations in market prices such as commodities, interest rates and foreign exchange rates.  These are the main market risks to which we are exposed.

50

We entered into short-term hedge transactions through commodity futures and options to hedge a portion of our requirements and as of December 31, 2013, 2012, 2011 these financial instruments that qualify as hedge accounting represented an unfavorable effect of Ps.71.5 million in 2013 and a favorable effect of Ps.119.3 million and Ps.14.9 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively. Also, we had for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 outstanding contracts for natural gas that did not qualify as hedge accounting and represented a favorable effect of Ps.17.1 million and unfavorable effect of Ps.40.2 million, respectively.

During 2013, GIMSA and Molinera de México entered into forward transactions for an aggregate nominal amount of U.S.$65 million, with maturity during January 2014, in order to hedge the Mexican peso to U.S. dollar foreign exchange rate risk related to the price of the corn purchases for the summer and winter corn harvests in Mexico. These foreign exchange derivative instruments did not qualify for hedging accounting.

The purpose of these contracts was to hedge the risks related to exchange rate fluctuations on the price of corn and wheat, which is denominated in U.S. dollars.  See “Item 11.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

We continuously engage in research and development activities that focus on, among other things: increasing the efficiency of our proprietary corn flour and corn/wheat tortilla production technology; maintaining high product quality; developing new and improved products and manufacturing equipment; improving the shelf life of certain corn and wheat products; improving and expanding our information technology system; engineering, plant design and construction; and compliance with environmental regulations.  We have obtained 58 patents in the United States since 1968.  Twenty of these patents are in force and effect in the United States as of the date hereof and the remaining 38 have expired.  We currently have four new patents in process in the United States.  Additionally, seven of our registered patents and design patents are currently in the process of being published in other countries.

Our research and development is conducted through our subsidiaries INTASA, Tecnomaíz and CIASA.As of March 21, 2014, INTASA was merged into Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V., and ceased to exist.  See “Item 4—Information on the Company—Organizational Structure—INTASA.” Through Tecnomaíz, we engage in the design, manufacture and sale of machines for the production of corn/wheat tortillas and tortilla chips.  CIASA administers and supervises the design and construction of our new plants and also provides advisory services and training to employees of our corn flour and tortilla manufacturing facilities.

We carried out proprietary technological research and development for corn milling and tortilla production as well as all engineering, plant design and construction through INTASA and CIASA.  We spent Ps.145 million, Ps.137 million and Ps.91 million on research and development in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

TREND INFORMATION

Our financial results will likely continue to be influenced by factors such as changes in the level of consumer demand for tortillas and corn flour, government policies regarding the Mexican tortilla and corn flour industry, and the cost of corn, wheat and wheat flour.  In addition, we expect our financial results in 2014 to be influenced by:

·volatility in corn and wheat prices;

·increased competition from tortilla manufacturers, especially in the U.S.;

·increase or decrease in the Hispanic population in the United States;

·increases in Mexican food consumption by the non-Hispanic population in the United States; as well as projected increases in Mexican food consumption and use of tortillas in non-Mexican cuisine as tortillas continue to be assimilated into mainstream cuisine in the U.S., Europe, Asia and Oceania, each of which could increase sales;

·volatility in energy costs;

·increased competition in the corn flour business;

·exchange rate fluctuations;

51

·civil and political unrest, currency devaluation and other governmental economic policies in Venezuela ; and

·unfavorable general economic conditions in the United States and globally, such as the recession or economic slowdown, which could negatively affect the affordability of and consumer demand for some of our products.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

As of December 31, 2013 we do not have any outstanding off-balance sheet arrangements.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS

We have commitments under certain firm contractual arrangements to make future payments for goods and services.  These firm commitments secure the future rights to various assets to be used in the normal course of operations.  For example, we are contractually committed to making certain minimum lease payments for the use of property under operating lease agreements.  The following table summarizes separately our material firm commitments at December 31, 2013 and the timing and effect that such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods.  In addition, the table reflects the timing of principal and interest payments on outstanding debt, which is discussed in “Item 5.  Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness.” We expect to fund the firm commitments with operating cash flow generated in the normal course of business. We may be liable for a contingent payment to ADM upon the recurrence of certain events pursuant to the terms of the relevant agreements. See Note 3 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments	Total	Less than 1 Year	From 1 to 3 Years	From 3 to 5 Years	Over 5 Years
	(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Long-term debt obligations	1,020.0	—	325.9	394.1	300.0
Operating lease obligations(1)	149.2	44.8	58.3	22.5	23.6
Finance lease obligations	1.1	0.3	0.8	—	—
Purchase obligations(2)	465.8	465.8	—	—	—
Interest payments on our indebtedness (3)	237.4	52.6	92.8	68.7	23.3
Other liabilities(4)	250.2	250.2	—	—	—
Total	2,123.7	813.7	477.8	485.3	346.9
Total in millions of peso equivalent amounts	27,770.6	10,640.3	6,248.0	6,346.0	4,536.2

(1)Operating lease obligations primarily relate to minimum lease rental obligations for our real estate and operating equipment in various locations.

(2)Purchase obligations relate to our minimum commitments to purchase commodities, raw materials, machinery and equipment.

(3)In the determination of our future estimated interest payments on our floating rate denominated debt, we used the interest rates in effect as of December 31, 2013.

(4)Other relates to liabilities for short-term bank loans and the current portion of long-term debt.

52

ITEM 6Directors, Senior Management and Employees.

MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Our management is vested in our board of directors.  Our day to day operations are handled by our executive officers.

Our bylaws require that our board of directors be composed of a minimum of five and a maximum of twenty-one directors, as decided at our Ordinary General Shareholders’ Meeting.  Pursuant to the Mexican Securities Law, at least 25% of the members of the board of directors must be independent.  In addition, under Mexican law, any holder or group of holders representing 10% or more of our capital stock may elect one director and its corresponding alternate.

The board of directors, which was elected at the Ordinary General Shareholders’ Meeting held on April 25, 2014, currently consists of 12 directors, with each director having a corresponding alternate director. At said meeting, Mr. Juan A. González Moreno was ratified as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Mr. Carlos Hank Gonzalez was ratified as Vice Chairman of said Board. The following table sets forth the current members of our board of directors, their ages, years of service, principal occupations, outside directorships, other business activities and experience, their directorship classifications as defined in the Code of Best Corporate Practices issued by a committee formed by the Consejo Coordinador Empresarial, or Mexican Entrepreneur Coordinating Board, and their alternates. The terms of their directorships are for one year or for up to thirty additional days if no designation of their substitute has been made or if the substitute has not taken office.

Juan A. González Moreno	Age:	56
	Years as Director:	20
	Principal Occupation:	Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of GRUMA and GIMSA
	Outside Directorships:	Director of Grupo Financiero Banorte, Chairman of the Board of Car Amigo USA
	Business Experience:	Several positions in GRUMA, including Chief Executive Officer of Special Projects of Gruma Corporation, President of Azteca Milling, Vice President of Central and Eastern Regions of Mission Foods, President and Vice President of Sales of Azteca Milling, Chief Executive Officer of Gruma Asia & Oceania
	Directorship Type:	Shareholder, Related
	Alternate:	Raúl Cavazos Morales
Carlos Hank González	Age:	42
	Years as Director:	1
	Principal Occupation:	Chief Executive Officer of Grupo Financiero Interacciones and Grupo Hermes
	Outside Directorships:	Director of Grupo Hermes, Grupo Financiero Interacciones, Bolsa Mexicana de Valores and Chairman of the Board of Cerrey
	Business Experience:	Chief Executive Officer of Casa de Bolsa Interacciones, Banco Interacciones and Automotriz Hermer
	Directorship Type:	Shareholder, Related
	Alternate:	Graciela González Moreno
Mayra González Moreno	Age:	64
	Years as Director:	1
	Principal Occupation:	Chairman of the Board of Saturitas

53

	Outside Directorships:	Proprietary Advisory Member of the Board of Trustees of Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias
	Business Experience:	Executive Chairwoman of the Steering Committee of Fundación Domus Alipio and Secretary of the Steering Committee of Fundación Eudes
	Directorship Type:	Shareholder, Related
	Alternate:	Edgar Valverde Rubizewsky
Homero Huerta Moreno	Age:	51
	Years as Director:	1
	Principal Occupation:	Chief Administrative Officer
	Outside Directorships:	None
	Business Experience:	Several positions within GRUMA including Corporate Internal Audit Vice President, Management Information Systems Vice President, Controller Vice President of Gruma Corporation and Finance and Administrative Vice President of Gruma Venezuela
	Directorship Type:	Related
	Alternate:	Rogelio Sánchez Martínez
Eduardo Livas Cantú	Age:	71
	Years as Director:	21
	Principal Occupation:	Member of GRUMA’s Executive Committee
	Outside Directorships:	Director of GIMSA, Grupo Financiero Banorte and Industrias Alen
	Business Experience:	Business consultant in different companies, several positions in GRUMA, including Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive Officer of Gruma Corporation
	Directorship Type:	Shareholder, Related
	Alternate:	Alfredo Livas Cantú
Javier Vélez Bautista	Age:	57
	Years as Director:	11
	Principal Occupation:	Member of GRUMA’s Executive Committee
	Outside Directorships:	Director of GIMSA and United States-Mexico Chamber of Commerce
	Business Experience:	Chief Executive Officer of Value Link and Nacional Monte de Piedad, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of GRUMA, Project Director at Booz Allen Hamilton
	Directorship Type:	Related
	Alternate:	Jorge Vélez Bautista
Gabriel A. Carrillo Medina	Age:	57
	Years as Director:	1
	Principal Occupation:	President and shareholder of Mail Rey and Detecno
	Outside Directorships:	Director of GIMSA
	Business Experience:	President of Asociación de Casas de Bolsa de Nuevo León and Club Deportivo San Agustín, several positions within Interacciones Casa de Bolsa, including Chief Financial Officer
	Directorship Type:	Independent
	Alternate:	Gabriel Carrillo Cattori
Everardo Elizondo Almaguer	Age:	70
	Years as Director:	Since April 2014
	Principal Occupation:	Economics Professor at EGAP/ITESM and regular columnist of the Reforma/El Norte
	Outside Directorships:	Director of GIMSA, Grupo Financiero Banorte, Compañía Minera Autlán, San Luis Corporación, Grupo Senda,  Fibra Inn, Advisory Council of Coca-Cola/KOF and External Advisory Counsil of the UANL
	Business Experience:	Deputy Director of Banco de México, Economic Studies Director of Grupo Financiero Bancomer and Economic Studies Director of Grupo Industrial Alfa
	Directoship Type:	Independent
	Alternate:	Ricardo Sada Villarreal
Thomas S. Heather Rodríguez	Age:	59
	Years as Director:	1
	Principal Occupation:	Partner of Ritch, Mueller, Heather y Nicolau
	Outside Directorships:	Director of GIMSA, Grupo Bimbo, Grupo Financiero Scotiabank, EMX Capital-CKD and GSF Telecom
	Business Experience:	Director and Administrator of Satélites Mexicanos, Director of JP Morgan, Bank of America Mexico, Hoteles Nikko and Grupo Modelo
	Directorship Type:	Independent
	Alternate:	Eugenio Sepúlveda Cosío
Juan Manuel Ley López	Age:	81
	Years as Director:	20
	Principal Occupation:	Chairman of the Board of Casa Ley and Chief Executive Officer of Grupo Ley
	Outside Directorships:	Director of Grupo Financiero Banamex-Accival and Telmex.
	Business Experience:	Chief Executive Officer of Casa Ley, Chairman of the Board of the Latin American Association of Supermarkets, Sinaloa-Baja California Consultant Council of Grupo Financiero Banamex-Accival and National Association of Supermarket and Retail Stores
	Directorship Type:	Independent
	Alternate:	Juan Manuel Ley Bastidas

54

Adrián Sada González	Age:	69
	Years as Director:	20
	Principal Occupation:	Chairman of the Board of VITRO
	Outside Directorships:	Director of ALFA, CYDSA, Consejo Mexicano de Hombres de Negocios and Grupo de Industriales de Nuevo León
	Business Experience:	Chairman of the Board of Grupo Financiero Serfin, Chief Executive Officer of Banpais
	Directorship Type:	Independent
	Alternate:	Manuel Güemez de la Vega
Alberto Santos Boesch	Age:	42
	Years as Director:	1
	Principal Occupation:	President of Empresas Santos, Presidente and Chief Executive Officer of Ingenios Santos, Vice President of Grupo Tres Vidas Acapulco and Regidor of San Pedro Garza García, Nuevo León
	Outside Directorships:	Director of Axtel, Interpuerto Monterrey, Fundación Santos y De la Garza Evia, Instituto Nuevo Amanecer, En Nuestras Manos, Red de Filantropía de Egresados y Amigos del Tec, DIF de Nuevo León and Museo Nacional de Energía y Tecnología
	Business Experience:	President of Aeropuerto del Norte and Director of Arena Monterrey
	Directorship Type:	Independent
	Alternate:	Carlos González Bolio

Juan A. González Moreno, Mayra González Moreno and Graciela González Moreno (jointly referred to as “Messrs. González Moreno”), members of our board of directors, are siblings. Homero Huerta Moreno, member of our board of directors, is the cousin of Messrs. González Moreno. Carlos Hank González, member of our board of directors, is the son of Graciela González Moreno and the nephew of Juan A. González Moreno and Mayra González Moreno. Edgar Valverde Rubizewsky, alternate member of our board of directors is the spouse of Mayra González Moreno.

Jorge Vélez Bautista, alternate member of our board of directors, is the brother of Javier Vélez Bautista. Alfredo Livas Cantú, alternate member of our board of directors, is the brother of Eduardo Livas Cantú. Juan Manuel Ley Bastidas, alternate member of our board of directors, is the son of Juan Manuel Ley López. Gabriel Carrillo Cattori, alternate member of our board of directors, is the son of Gabriel A. Carrillo Medina.

Secretary

The secretary of the board of directors is Mr. Salvador Vargas Guajardo, and his alternate is Mr. Guillermo Elizondo Ríos.  Mr. Vargas Guajardo is not a member of the board of directors.

Senior Management

The following table sets forth our executive officers, their ages, years of service, current positions, and prior business experience:

Juan A. González Moreno	Age:	56
	Years as Executive Officer:	10

55

	Years at GRUMA:	34
	Current Position:	Chief Executive Officer
	Other Positions:	Chief Executive Officer of GIMSA
	Business Experience:	Several positions in GRUMA, including Chief Executive Officer of Special Projects of Gruma Corporation, President of Azteca Milling, Vice President of Central and Eastern Regions of Mission Foods, President and Vice President of Sales of Azteca Milling, Chief Executive Officer of Gruma Asia & Oceania
Raúl Cavazos Morales	Age:	54
	Years as Executive Officer:	2
	Years at GRUMA:	26
	Current Position:	Chief Financial Officer
	Other Positions:	Chief Financial Officer of GIMSA
	Business Experience:	Several finance positions within GRUMA, including Chief Treasury Officer and Vice President of Corporate Treasury
Leonel Garza Ramírez	Age:	64
	Years as Executive Officer:	15
	Years at GRUMA:	28
	Current Position:	Chief Procurement Officer
	Business Experience:	Manager of Quality and Corn Procurement and Vice President of Corn Procurement at GRUMA, Chief Procurement Officer at GAMESA, Quality Control and Research and Development Manager at Kellogg de México
Homero Huerta Moreno	Age:	51
	Years as Executive Officer:	12
	Years at GRUMA:	29
	Current Position:	Chief Administrative Officer
	Business Experience:	Several positions within GRUMA including Corporate Internal Audit Vice President, Management Information Systems Vice President, Controllership Vice President of Gruma Corporation and Finance and Administrative Vice President of Gruma Venezuela
Felipe Antonio Rubio Lamas	Age:	56
	Years as Executive Officer:	12
	Years at GRUMA:	31
	Current Position:	Chief Technology Officer
	Business Experience:	Several managerial and Senior Vice President positions within Gruma Corporation related to manufacturing processes, engineering, design, and construction of production facilities
Salvador Vargas Guajardo	Age:	61
	Years as Executive Officer:	17
	Years at GRUMA:	17
	Current Position:	General Counsel
	Other Positions:	General Counsel of GIMSA
	Business Experience:	Positions at Grupo Alfa, Protexa and Proeza, Senior Partner of two law firms, including Margáin-Rojas-González-Vargas-De la Garza y Asociados

Homero Huerta Moreno, our Chief Administrative Officer, is the cousin of Messrs. González Moreno.

56

Audit and Corporate Governance Committees

As required by the Mexican Securities Law, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and our bylaws, members of our audit and corporate governance committees were selected from members of the board of directors.  Consequently, as required by the Mexican Securities Law and our bylaws, a chairman for each committee was elected by the General Ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting held on April 25, 2014, from among the members appointed by the board.

The current audit and corporate governance committees are comprised of three members, all of whom are independent directors. Set forth below are the names of the members of our audit and corporate governance committees, their positions within the committees, and their directorship type:

Thomas S. Heather	Position:	Chairman of the audit and corporate governance committees.
	Directorship Type:	Independent
Gabriel A. Carrillo Medina	Position:	Member of the audit and corporate governance committees.
	Directorship Type:	Independent
Everardo Elizondo Almaguer	Position:	Member and Financial Expert of the audit and corporate governance committees.
	Directorship Type:	Independent

Executive Committee

An executive committee was created by the meeting of the board of directors held on February 27, 2013 to strengthen the link between the Board of Directors and the company’s management for the decision making process. Members of the executive committee were selected from members of the board of directors.

Set forth below are the names of our executive committee members, their positions, and their directorship type:

Juan A. González Moreno	Position:	Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
	Directorship Type:	Shareholder, Related
Carlos Hank González	Position:	Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors
	Directorship Type:	Shareholder, Related
Eduardo Livas Cantú	Position:	Member of the Board of Directors
	Directorship Type:	Related
Javier Vélez Bautista	Position:	Member of the Board of Directors
	Directorship Type:	Related

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT

Members of the board of directors are paid a fee of Ps.80,000 for each board meeting they attend.  Additionally, members of the audit and corporate governance committees are paid a fee of Ps.40,000 for each committee meeting they attend.

For 2013, the aggregate amount of compensation paid to all directors, alternate directors, executive officers and audit and corporate governance committees members was approximately Ps.198.9 million.  The contingent or deferred compensation reserved as of December 31, 2013 was Ps.34.8 million.

57

We offer an Executive Bonus Plan that applies to managers, vice presidents, and executive officers.  The variable compensation under this plan can range from 21% to 100% of annual base compensation, depending upon the employee’s level, his individual performance and the results of our operations.

EMPLOYEES

As of December 31, 2013, we had a total of 19,202 employees, including 12,107 unionized and 7,095 non-unionized full- and part-time employees. Of this total, we employed 7,916 persons in Mexico, 7,092 in the United States, 2,038 in Central America and Ecuador, 798 in Asia and Oceania, and 1,358 in Europe. Total employees for 2011 and 2012 were 21,974 and 21,318 respectively. Of our total employees as of December 31, 2013, approximately 37% were white-collar and 63% were blue collar.

In Mexico, workers at each of our plants are covered by a separate contract, under which salary revisions take place once each year, usually in January or February. Non-salary provisions of these contracts are revised bi-annually.  We renewed agreements with the three unions that represent our workers in 2012.

In the United States, Gruma Corporation has five collective bargaining agreements that represent a total of 602 workers at five separate facilities (Pueblo, Tempe, Henderson, Omaha and Madera). We renewed such agreements on March 23, 2013, March 27, 2011 and January 22, 2011, respectively, and have entered into new agreements in Omaha on April 10, and in Madera on July 1, 2012.

In England, we have one collective bargaining agreement covering 11 employees at a facility, which is renewed every 12 months.

In the Netherlands, we are covered by a national labor agreement for bakery workers. This agreement is reviewed every six to twenty four months, depending on the term of the agreement.

In Australia, we have a collective bargaining agreement covering 223 employees at our facility, which is renewed every three years.

In Italy, we are covered by a national labor agreement for industrial food staff. This agreement is reviewed every 12 to18 months nationally.

Wages are reviewed during the negotiations and wage increases processed according to the terms of each agreement as well as non-monetary provisions of the agreement. Wage reviews for non-union employees are conducted once each year, typically in March for Mission Foods and depending on the non-union plant, wage reviews are conducted from June through October for Azteca Milling. We believe our current labor relations are good.

SHARE OWNERSHIP

As of April 25, 2014, the following Directors and Senior Managers have GRUMA shares which in each case represent less than 1% of our capital stock:  Eduardo Livas Cantú and Leonel Garza Ramírez. Juan A. González Moreno, Mayra González Moreno, Graciela González Moreno and Carlos Hank González are the only directors that beneficially own more than 1% of GRUMA’s outstanding shares. In addition, based on information available to us, Ms. Graciela Moreno Hernández, the widow of the late Mr. Roberto González Barrera, and certain of her descendants directly and through trusts own 240,832,032 shares representing approximately 55.65% of our outstanding shares.

ITEM 7Major Shareholders And Related Party Transactions.

MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our capital stock as of April 25, 2014 (which consists entirely of Series B Shares), according to the information on record obtained from our annual shareholders meeting held on such date and the information available to us. Ms. Graciela Moreno Hernández, the widow of the late Mr. Roberto González Barrera, and certain of her descendants (the “Primary Shareholder Group”) are the only shareholders we know collectively to beneficially own more than 5% of our capital stock.  We repurchased ADM’s stake in us in December 2012. See “Item 4.  Information on the Company—Share Purchase Transaction with Archer-Daniels-Midland”. See “Item 9.  The Offer and Listing” for a further discussion of our capital stock.  Our majority shareholder does not have different or preferential voting rights with respect to those shares they own.  As of April 25, 2014, our Series B shares were held by more than 2,170 record holders in Mexico.

58

Name	Number of Series B Shares		Percentage of Outstanding Shares
Primary Shareholder Group (1)	240,832,032	(1)	55.65	%
Other shareholders	191,917,047		44.35	%
Total	432,749,079	(2)	100	%

(1)The shares beneficially owned by the Primary Shareholder Group include: 159,701,704 shares held indirectly by the Primary Shareholder Group through two trusts.

(2)As of April 25, 2014, our capital stock was represented by 432,749,079 issued Series B, class I, no par value shares (“Series B shares”), of which 432,749,079 shares were outstanding, all of them fully subscribed and paid.

The Primary Shareholder Group controls approximately 55.65% of our outstanding shares and therefore has the power to elect a majority of our 12 directors.  In addition, under Mexican law, any holder or group of holders representing 10% or more of our capital stock may elect one director for each 10% of capitalstock held.

We cannot assure that the Primary Shareholder Group will continue to act together for purposes of control. Additionally, the Primary Shareholder Group may pledge part of its shares in us to secure any future borrowings. If such were the case, and the Primary Shareholder Group were to default on its payment obligations, the lenders could enforce their rights with respect to such shares, and the Primary Shareholder Group could lose its controlling interest in us resulting in a change of control. A change of control could trigger a default in some of our credit agreements and the indenture governing our perpetual bonds and have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Other than changes resulting from the ADM Transaction and as a result of the death of Mr. Roberto González Barrera’s, we are not aware of any significant changes in the percentage of ownership of any shareholders which held 5% or more of our outstanding shares during the past three years.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The transactions set forth below were made in the ordinary course of business, on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons, and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.

Transactions with Subsidiaries

We periodically enter into short-term credit arrangements with our subsidiaries, where we provide them with funds for working capital at market interest rates.

At their peak on December 13, 2013, the outstanding balance of loans from GIMSA to GRUMA were Ps.3,197 million. The average interest rate for these loans from 2011 to March 31, 2014 was 5.67%. As of March 31, 2014, we have no outstanding balance owed to GIMSA.

Additionally, as of March 31, 2014, the outstanding balance of loans from Gruma to GIMSA was Ps.296 million, with an interest rate of 5.90%.

In September of 2001, Gruma Corporation started to make loans to us.  Since 2010 these operations, at their peak on December 2012, reached the amount of U.S.$50 million.  From 2011 to March 31, 2014, we borrowed money from Gruma Corporation at an average rate of 1.0%.  As of March 31, 2014, we have no outstanding balance owing to Gruma Corporation.

59

Additionally, on July 1, 2013, Gruma Corporation entered into a 2-year loan with GRUMA for the amount of U.S.$180 million, with equal quarterly payments and an interest rate of 4.5%, which is the peak of these operations since 2011. As of March 31, 2014 this loan has an outstanding balance of U.S.$140 million.

Transactions with Archer-Daniels-Midland

We entered into an association with Archer-Daniels-Midland in September 1996.  As a result of this association, (i) we received U.S.$258.0 million in cash, (ii) GRUMA and Archer-Daniels-Midland combined their U.S. corn flour operations under Azteca Milling, our wholly-owned U.S. corn flour operations, and, as a result, Archer-Daniels-Midland received a 20% partnership interest in Azteca Milling, and (iii) we received 60% of the capital stock of Molinera de México, Archer-Daniels-Midland’s wholly-owned Mexican wheat milling operations.  We also gained exclusivity rights from Archer-Daniels-Midland in specified corn flour and wheat flour markets.

In return, Archer-Daniels-Midland received 74,696,314 of our then newly issued shares, which represented approximately 22% of our total outstanding shares at that time, and 20% partnership interest in Azteca Milling, and retained 40% of the capital stock of Molinera de México.  Archer-Daniels-Midland also obtained the right to designate two of our directors and their corresponding alternates. Thereafter, Archer-Daniels-Midland acquired a 3% indirect stake in MONACA and DEMASECA.

On December 14, 2012, we acquired through the exercise of a purchase option pursuant to certain rights of first refusal (the “ADM Transaction”) the stake that Archer-Daniels-Midland owned directly and indirectly in us and certain of our subsidiaries (the “Equity Interests”), consisting of:

·18.81% of the then outstanding shares of Gruma S.A.B. de C.V. and, indirectly, an additional 4.35% of the then outstanding shares of Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. via the acquisition of 45% of the shares of Valores Azteca, S.A. de C.V. (“Valores Azteca”), a company that owned 9.66% of the shares of Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V.;

·3% of the partnership interest of Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino, holding companies of the Venezuelan companies, MONACA and DEMASECA, respectively;

·40% of the shares of Molinera de Mexico, our wheat flour business in Mexico; and

·100% of the shares of Valley Holding Inc., a company that owns 20% of Azteca Milling, our corn flour business in the United States.

The Equity Interests were acquired from Archer-Daniels-Midland for U.S.$450 million plus a contingent payment of up to US$60 million, which contingent payment is payable only if during the 42 months following the closing of the ADM Transaction certain conditions are met. See “Item 10.  Additional Information—Material Contracts.”  The economic terms of the ADM Transaction were based on the terms contained in the offer made by a third party to Archer-Daniels-Midland for the purchase of the Equity Interests.  As a result of the ADM Transaction, Archer-Daniels-Midland no longer holds an ownership interest in the Company.

Prior to the closing of the ADM Transaction and obtaining the Short-Term Facilities, the Board of Directors of GRUMA, with the previous favorable opinion of the Audit Committee and the Corporate Governance Committee based on a fairness opinion issued by an independent expert, approved the exercise by the Company of the option pursuant to a right of first refusal to acquire the Equity Interests and obtain the required financing. See “Item 5—Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Indebtedness.”

During 2010, 2011, and 2012 we purchased U.S.$97 million, U.S.$147 million and U.S.$179 million, respectively, of inventory, including primarily wheat and corn, from Archer-Daniels-Midland Corporation, a shareholder during those years, at market rates and terms.  For more information regarding these transactions, please see “Item 4.  Information on the Company—Business Overview—Discontinued Operations— Venezuelan Companies.”

Other Transactions

Until February 15, 2011, we held approximately 8.8% of the outstanding shares of GFNorte, a Mexican financial institution. On February 15, 2011, we concluded the sale of all of our shares of GFNorte’s capital stock.  As a result of the sale, GRUMA no longer holds any stake in GFNorte.

60

In the past, we obtained financing from GFNorte’s subsidiaries at market rates and terms.  For the past eight years, the highest outstanding loan amount has been Ps.600 million (in nominal terms) with an interest rate of 7.3% in June 2011.  In addition, we have insurance contracts in place with Seguros Banorte Generali, S.A. de C.V., a subsidiary of GFNorte, to manage certain risks associated with some of our subsidiaries.  In 2011, 2012 and 2013, we paid insurance premiums of approximately Ps.110,239, Ps.114,422 and Ps.18,379, respectively.

For more information, please see Note 31 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 8Financial Information.

See “Item 18. Financial Statements.” For information on our dividend policy, see “Item 3.  Key Information—Selected Financial Data—Dividends.” For information on legal proceedings related to us, see “—Legal Proceedings.”

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In the ordinary course of business, we are party to various legal proceedings, none of which has had or we reasonably expect will have a material adverse effect on us.

United States

Cox v. Gruma Corporation.

On or about December 21, 2012, a consumer filed a putative class action against Gruma Corporation, claiming that Mission tortilla chips should not be labeled “All Natural” if they contain certain non-natural ingredients. The plaintiff seeks restitution or other actual damages including attorneys’ fees. In response to a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granted in part Gruma Corporation’s motion, and referred to the US FDA for an administrative determination regarding the use of the “All Natural” identifier.  On January 6, 2014 the FDA responded that it would not, at this time, consider the referred issue.  The court then requested additional briefing from the parties, and will be proceeding with the case.

We intend to vigorously defend against this action.  It is the opinion of the Company that the outcome of this proceeding will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

Mexico

Income Tax Claims.

The Ministry of Finance and Public Credit has lodged certain tax assessments against us for an amount of Ps.29.9 million plus penalties, inflation adjustments and charges in connection with withholding on interest payments to our foreign creditors during the years 2001 and 2002. Mexican tax authorities claim that the Company should have withheld at a higher rate than the 4.9% actually withheld by the Company. The Company has filed several motions to annul these assessments. Such motions later were relinquished, in order to be eligible for the tax amnesty program set forth in the Provisional Article Third of the Federal Income Law for the 2013 Fiscal Year.

Thereafter on May 2013, the partial tax assessment relief was authorized, and we paid Ps.3.3 million on May 21, 2013 to settle the dispute.

On January 29, 2014, the International Taxation Central Administration Office lodged a tax assessment against the Company for an amount of Ps.41.2 million in connection with the 2001 and 2002 years, and derived from the initial assessment lodgedin 2005. Given that the assessment was partially relieved (80%) and, that the remaining amount was paid on May of 2013, we intend to request reversal.

We intend to vigorously defend against this action. It is the opinion of the Company that the outcome of this proceeding will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

61

CNBV Investigation.

On December 8, 2009, the Surveillance Office of the Comisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores (the Mexican National Banking and Securities Commission, or CNBV) began an investigation into the Company in respect of the timely disclosure of material events reported through the Mexican Stock Exchange during the end of 2008 and throughout 2009 in connection with the Company’s foreign exchange derivative losses and the subsequent conversion of the realized losses into debt.  In 2011, the CNBV commenced an administrative proceeding against the Company for alleged infringements to applicable legislation.  The Company participated in this proceeding in order to demonstrate its compliance with current legislation and to adopt applicable defenses as deemed appropriate in order to protect Gruma’s interests.

On October 29, 2013, we were notified by the CNBV of its resolution whereby a fine equivalent to Ps.4.2 million was imposed on us, same which we timely paid and therefore, the proceeding initiated by the CNBV on August of 2011, was finally concluded.

SAT Information Request.

From time to time we receive requests for information from the Mexican tax authorities with respect to prior closed fiscal years. Most recently, on February 5, 2014, we received a request for information from the Financial Sector Tax Control Central Administration Office of the Servicio de Administración Tributaria (the Mexican Tax Administration Service, or SAT) with respect to derivative losses incurred in 2009. As of the date hereof we have fully complied with the SAT’s information request and are awaiting a response, which we believe should be favorable, although we can give no assurance in that regard.

Discontinued Operations-Venezuela

Expropriation Proceedings by the Venezuelan Government.

On May 12, 2010, the Republic published the Expropriation Decree, which announced the forced acquisition of all goods, movables and real estate of MONACA.  The Republic has expressed to GRUMA’s representatives that the Expropriation Decree extends to DEMASECA.

GRUMA’s interests in MONACA and DEMASECA are held through two Spanish companies: Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino, respectively.  In 2010, Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino commenced negotiations with the Republic with the intention of reaching an amicable settlement.  Through Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino, GRUMA participated in these negotiations with a view to (i) continuing its presence in Venezuela by potentially entering into a joint venture with the Venezuelan government; and/or (ii) seeking adequate compensation for the assets subject to expropriation.

The Republic and the Kingdom of Spain are parties to the Investment Treaty, under which the Investors may settle investment disputes by means of arbitration before ICSID.  On November 9, 2011, the Investors, MONACA and DEMASECA validly provided formal notice to the Republic that an investment dispute had arisen as a consequence of the Expropriation Decree and related measures adopted by the Republic.  In that notification, the Investors, MONACA, and DEMASECA also gave their consent to submission of the dispute to ICSID arbitration if the parties were unable to reach an amicable agreement.

On January 22, 2013, the Venezuelan Government issued a resolution providing the right to take control over the operations of MONACA and DEMASECA.

Following the notice of the investment dispute on November 9, 2011, on May 10, 2013, Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino commenced an arbitration proceeding against the Republic before the ICSID based in Washington, D.C. ICSID registered the arbitration application on June 11, 2013 under case No. ARB/13/11. The arbitration panel has already been formed. The purpose of the arbitration is to seek compensation for the damages caused by the Republic’s violation of Articles III (obstruction of management, maintenance, development, using, enjoyment, extension, sale and liquidation of the investment), IV (lack of fair and equitable treatment) and V (transfer of investment income as repatriation of capital, royalty payment) of the Investment Treaty, to the detriment of Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino, in their capacity as Spanish investors. In the arbitration application filed before the ICSID, Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino have reserved their rights to extend the dispute against the Republic, in case it executes the forced acquisition of MONACA and DEMASECA Decree.

The tribunal that presides over this arbitration proceeding was constituted in January 2014. Under the provisions of the Investment Treaty, Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino have not yet made a claim for compensation resulting from

62

expropriation, but have made a claim for damages resulting from the Republic’s actions in respect of the property owned by Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino.

While negotiations with the government have taken place and may take place from time to time, the Company cannot assure that such negotiations will be successful or will result in the Investors receiving adequate compensation, if any, for their investments subject to the Expropriation Decree.  Additionally, the Company cannot predict the results of any arbitral proceeding, or the ramifications that costly and prolonged legal disputes could have on its results of operations or financial position, or the likelihood of collecting a favorable arbitration award.  The Company and its subsidiaries reserve and intend to continue to reserve the right to seek full compensation for any and all expropriated assets and investments under applicable law, including investment treaties and customary international law. We do not have insurance for the risk of appropriation.

Intervention Proceedings by the Venezuelan Government.

On December 4, 2009, the Eleventh Investigations Court for Criminal Affairs of Caracas issued an order authorizing the precautionary seizure of assets in which Ricardo Fernández Barrueco had any interest.  As a result of Ricardo Fernández Barrueco’s former indirect minority ownership of MONACA and DEMASECA, these subsidiaries were subject to the precautionary measure. Between 2009 and 2012, the Ministry of Finance of Venezuela, pursuant to the precautionary measure ordered by the court, designated several special managers of the indirect minority shareholding that Ricardo Fernández Barrueco had previously owned in MONACA and DEMASECA.  On January 22, 2013, the Ministry of Justice and Internal Relations revoked the prior designations made by the Ministry of Finance of Venezuela and made a new designation of individuals as special managers and representatives of the Republic of Venezuela in MONACA and DEMASECA, conferring on them the power to take control of the operations of these companies.

MONACA and DEMASECA, as well as Consorcio Andino and Valores Mundiales, as holders of the Venezuelan subsidiaries, filed a petition as aggrieved third-parties in the proceedings against Ricardo Fernández Barrueco challenging the precautionary measures and all related actions.  On November 19, 2010, the Eleventh Investigations Court for Criminal Affairs of Caracas ruled that MONACA and DEMASECA are companies wholly owned by Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino, respectively.  In spite of this ruling, the court kept the precautionary measures issued on December 4, 2009 in effect.  An appeal has been filed, which is pending resolution as of this date.

The People’s Defense Institute for the Access of Goods and Services of Venezuela (“INDEPABIS”) issued an order, on a precautionary basis, authorizing the temporary occupation and operation of MONACA for a period of 90 calendar days from December 16, 2009, which was renewed for the same period on March 16, 2010.  The order expired on June 16, 2010 and as of the date hereof MONACA has not been notified of any extension or similar measure.  INDEPABIS has also initiated a regulatory proceeding against MONACA in connection with alleged failure to comply with regulations governing precooked corn flour and for allegedly refusing to sell this product as a result of the December 4, 2009 precautionary asset seizure described above. MONACA filed an appeal against these proceedings which has not been resolved as of the date hereof.

Additionally, INDEPABIS initiated an investigation of DEMASECA and issued an order, on a precautionary basis, authorizing the temporary occupation and operation of DEMASECA for a period of 90 calendar days from May 25, 2010, which was extended until November 21, 2010.  INDEPABIS issued a new precautionary measure of occupation and temporary operation of DEMASECA, valid for the duration of this investigation.  DEMASECA has challenged these measures but as of the date hereof, no resolution has been issued.  The proceedings are still pending.

The Company intends to exhaust all legal remedies available in order to safeguard and protect the Company’s legitimate interests. See Note 30 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 9The Offer And Listing.

TRADING HISTORY

Our Series B Shares have been traded on the Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, S.A.B. de C.V., or Mexican Stock Exchange, since 1994.  The ADSs, each representing four Series B Shares, commenced trading on the New York Stock Exchange in November 1998.  As of December 31, 2013, our capital stock was represented by 432’749,079 issued Series B shares, all of them fully subscribed and paid,.  As of December 31, 2013, 45’310,752 Series B shares of our common stock were represented by 11’327,688  ADSs held by 5 record holders in the United States.

63

PRICE HISTORY

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the annual high and low closing sale prices for the Series B Shares and the ADSs as reported by the Mexican Stock Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange, respectively.

	Mexican Stock Exchange		NYSE
	Common Stock		ADS(2)
	High	Low	High	Low
	(Ps. Per share(1))		(U.S.$ per ADS)
Annual Price History
2009	25.67	3.67	7.89	.9214
2010	28.70	16.97	8.99	5.20
2011	28.66	19.61	8.96	6.33
2012	41.54	26.45	12.76	7.79
2013	98.92	39.50	31.00	12.32
Quarterly Price History
2011
1st Quarter	27.24	22.17	8.96	7.19
2nd Quarter	24.71	19.61	8.36	6.63
3rd Quarter	25.39	20.00	8.60	6.33
4th Quarter	28.66	23.10	8.54	6.90
2012
1st Quarter	34.39	26.45	10.77	7.79
2nd Quarter	38.94	30.09	11.81	8.58
3rd Quarter	36.88	33.26	11.26	9.83
4th Quarter	41.54	35.87	12.76	10.66
2013
1st Quarter	57.48	39.50	18.65	12.32
2nd Quarter	66.51	52.59	21.74	16.95
3rd Quarter	77.46	58.19	23.64	18.32
4th Quarter	98.92	73.83	31.00	22.36
2014
1st Quarter	110.95	100.01	33.53	30.79
Monthly Price History
October 2013	89.42	73.83	27.36	22.36
November 2013	92.64	86.44	28.54	26.01
December 2013	98.92	91.09	31.00	27.76
January 2014	109.84	100.01	33.09	30.48
February 2014	110.95	103.99	33.53	31.34
March 2014	108.82	102.60	33.08	30.79
April 2014 (3)	110.44	105.96	33.79	32.20

(1) Pesos per share reflect nominal price at trade date.

(2) Price per ADS in U.S.$; one ADS represents four Series B Shares.

(3) As of April 21, 2014.

On April 21, 2014, the last reported sale price of the B Shares on the Mexican Stock Exchange was Ps.109.10 per B Share.  On April 21, 2014, the last reported sale price of the ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange was U.S.$ 33.48 per ADS.

MEXICAN STOCK EXCHANGE

The Mexican Stock Exchange, located in Mexico City, is the only stock exchange in Mexico.  Founded in 1907, it is organized as a corporation whose shares were originally held by brokerage firms, which are exclusively authorized to trade on the exchange.  As of June 13, 2008 the Mexican Stock Exchange became a publicly traded company.  Trading on the Mexican Stock Exchange takes place principally through automated systems and is open between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.  Mexico City time, each business day.  Trades in securities listed on the Mexican Stock Exchange can also be performed off the exchange.  The

64

Mexican Stock Exchange operates a system of automatic suspension of trading in shares of a particular issuer as a means of controlling excessive price volatility.

Settlement is effected three business days after a share transaction on the Mexican Stock Exchange.  Deferred settlement, even by mutual agreement, is not permitted without the approval of the Comisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores (the Mexican National Banking and Securities Commission, or CNBV).  Most securities traded on the Mexican Stock Exchange, including ours, are on deposit with S.D. Indeval Institución para el Depósito de Valores, S.A. de C.V., or Indeval, a privately owned securities depositary that acts as a clearinghouse for Mexican Stock Exchange transactions.

As of June 2, 2001, the Mexican Securities Law requires issuers to increase the protections offered to minority shareholders and to impose corporate governance controls on Mexican listed companies in line with international standards.  The Mexican Securities Law expressly permits Mexican listed companies, with prior authorization from the CNBV, to include in their bylaws antitakeover defenses such as shareholder rights plans, or poison pills.  Our bylaws include certain of these protections.  See “Additional Information—Bylaws—Antitakeover Protections.”

MARKET MAKER

On September 30, 2009, we entered into an agreement with UBS Casa de Bolsa (“UBS”) pursuant to which UBS acts as a market maker for our common shares listed on the Mexican Stock Exchange.  The purpose of the agreement is to provide liquidity for the Company’s shares.  This agreement has been extended until September 30, 2014.

ITEM 10       Additional Information.

BYLAWS

Set forth below is a brief summary of certain significant provisions of our bylaws, according to their last comprehensive amendment.  This description does not purport to be complete and is qualified by reference to our bylaws, which are incorporated as an exhibit to this Annual Report.

The new Mexican Securities Law of 2006 included provisions seeking to improve the applicable regulations on disclosure of information, minority shareholder rights and corporate governance of the issuers, among other matters.  It also imposes additional duties and liabilities on the members of the board of directors as well as senior officers.  Thus, we were required to carry out a comprehensive amendment of our bylaws through an extraordinary general shareholders’ meeting held on November 30, 2006.

Incorporation and Register

We were incorporated in Monterrey, Mexico on December 24, 1971 as a corporation (Sociedad Anónima de Capital Variable) under the Mexican Corporations Law, for a term of 99 years.  On November 30, 2006 we became a publicly held corporation (Sociedad Anónima Bursátil de Capital Variable), a special corporate form for all Mexican publicly traded companies pursuant to the regulations of the new Mexican Securities Law.

Corporate Purpose

Our main corporate purpose, as fully described in Article Second of our bylaws, is to serve as a holding company and to engage in various activities such as: (i) purchasing, selling, importing, exporting, and manufacturing all types of goods and products, (ii) issuing any kind of securities and taking all actions in connection therewith (iii) creating, organizing and managing all types of companies, (iv) acting as an agent or representative, (v) purchasing, selling and holding real property, (vi) performing or receiving professional, technical or consulting services, (vii) establishing branches, agencies or representative offices, (viii) acquiring, licensing, or using intellectual or industrial property, (ix) granting and receiving loans, (x) subscribing, issuing and negotiating all types of credit instruments, and (xi) performing any acts necessary to accomplish the foregoing.

Directors

Our bylaws provide that our management shall be vested in the board of directors and our Chief Executive Officer.  Each director is elected by a simple majority of the shares.  Under Mexican law and our bylaws, any holder or group of holders owning 10% or more of our capital stock may elect one director and its corresponding alternate.  The board of directors must be comprised of a minimum of five and a maximum of twenty-one directors, as determined by the shareholders at the annual ordinary general

65

shareholders’ meeting.  Additionally, under the Mexican Securities Law, at least 25% of the members of the board of directors must be independent.  Currently, our board of directors consists of 12 members.

The board of directors shall meet at least four times a year.  These meetings can be called by the Chairman of the board of directors, the Chairman of the Audit and Corporate Governance Committees, or by 25% of the members of the board of directors.  The directors serve for a one year term, or for up to 30 (thirty) additional days, if no designation of their substitute has been made or if the substitute has not taken office.  Directors receive compensation as determined by the shareholders at the annual ordinary general shareholders’ meeting.  The majority of directors are needed to constitute a quorum, and board resolutions must be passed by a majority of the votes present at any validly constituted meeting or by unanimous consent if no meeting is convened.

Our bylaws provide that the board of directors has the authority and responsibility to: (i) set the general strategies for the business of the Company; (ii) oversee the performance and conduct of business of the Company; (iii) oversee the main risks encountered by the Company, identified by the information submitted by the committees, the Chief Executive Officer and the firm providing the external auditing services; (iv) approve the information and communication policies with shareholders and the market; and (v) instruct the Chief Executive Officer to disclose to the investor public any material information when known.

Additionally, the board of directors has the authority and responsibility to approve, with the previous opinion of the corresponding Committee: (i) the policies for the use of the Company’s assets by any related party; (ii) related party transactions other than those occurring in the ordinary course of business, those of insignificant amount, and those deemed as done within market prices; (iii) the purchase or sale of 5% or more of our corporate assets; (iv) granting of warranties or the assumption of liabilities for more than 5% of our corporate assets; (v) the appointment, and in its case, removal of the Chief Executive Officer, as the designation of integral compensation policies for all other senior officers; (vi) internal control and internal audit guidelines; (vii) the Company’s accounting guidelines; (viii) the Company’s financial statements; and (ix) the hiring of the firm providing external audit services and, in its case, any services additional or supplemental to the external audit.  The approval of the board in all of these matters is non-delegable.

See “Item 6.  Directors, Senior Management and Employees” for further information about the board of directors.

Audit and Corporate Governance Committees

Under our bylaws and in accordance with the Mexican Securities Law, the board of directors, through the Audit and Corporate Governance Committees as well as through the firm performing the external audit, shall be in charge of the surveillance of the Company.  Such Committees should be exclusively comprised by independent directors and by a minimum of three members, elected by the board of directors at the proposal of the Chairman of the Board.  The Chairman of such Committees shall be exclusively designated and/or removed from office by the annual ordinary general shareholders’ meeting.

For the performance of its duties, the Corporate Governance Committee shall: (i) render its opinion to the board of directors, pursuant to the Mexican Securities Law; (ii) request the opinion of independent experts, when deemed convenient; (iii) convene shareholders meetings and include issues in the agenda they deem appropriate; (iv) assist the board of directors when making the annual reports; and (v) be responsible for other activity provided by law or our bylaws.

Likewise, for the performance of its duties, the Audit Committee shall: (i) render its opinion to the board of directors, pursuant to the Mexican Securities Law; (ii) request the opinion of independent experts when deemed convenient; (iii) convene shareholders meetings and include issues in the agenda they deem appropriate; (iv) assess the performance of the external auditing firm, as well as analyze the opinions and reports rendered by the external auditor; (v) discuss the financial statements of the Company and, if appropriate, recommend its approval to the board of directors; (vi) inform the board of directors of the condition of the internal controls and internal auditing systems, including any irregularities detected therein; (vii) prepare the opinion of the report rendered by the Chief Executive Officer; (viii) assist the board of directors when making the annual reports; (ix) request from the senior officers and from other employees, reports relevant to the preparation of the financial information and of any other kind deemed necessary for the performance of their duties; (x) investigate possible irregularities within the Company, as well as carry out the actions deemed appropriate; (xi) request meetings with senior officers in connection with the internal control and internal audit; (xii) inform the board of directors about the material irregularities detected while exerting their duties, and in case of any irregularities, notify the board of directors of any corrective measures taken; (xiii) ensure that the Chief Executive Officer complies with the resolutions taken by the Shareholders’ Meetings and by the board of directors; (xiv) oversee the establishment of internal controls in order to verify that the transactions of the Company conform to the applicable legal regulations; and (xv) be responsible of any other activity provided by law or our bylaws.

66

Fiduciary Duties - Duty of Diligence

Our bylaws and the Mexican Securities Law provide that the directors shall act in good faith and in our best interest.  In order to fulfill this duty, our directors may: (i) request information about us that is reasonably necessary to take actions; (ii) require the presence of any officers or other key employees, including the external auditors, that may contribute elements for taking actions at board meetings; (iii) postpone board meetings when a director has not been given sufficient notice of the meeting or in the event that a director has not been provided with the information provided to the other directors; and (iv) discuss and vote on any item requesting, if deemed convenient, the exclusive presence of the members and the secretary of the board of directors.

Our directors may be liable for damages caused when breaching their duty of diligence if such failure causes economic damage to the Company or our subsidiaries, as well as if the director: (i) fails to attend board or committee meetings and, as a result of such absence, the board was unable to take action, unless such absence is approved by the shareholders meeting; (ii) fails to disclose to the board of directors or the committees material information necessary to reach a decision; and/or (iii) fails to comply with its duties imposed by the Mexican Securities Law or our bylaws.  Members of the board of directors may not represent shareholders at any shareholders’ meeting.

Fiduciary Duties - Duty of Loyalty

Our bylaws and the Mexican Securities Law provide that the directors and secretary of the board shall keep confidential any non-public information and matters about which they have knowledge as a result of their position.  Also, directors must abstain from participating, attending or voting at meetings related to matters where they have or may have a conflict of interest.

The directors and secretary of the board of directors will be deemed to have violated their duty of loyalty and will be liable for any damages when they, directly or through third parties, obtain an economic benefit by virtue of their position without legitimate cause.  Furthermore, the directors will fail to comply with their duty of loyalty if they: (i) vote at a board meeting or take any action where there is a conflict of interest; (ii) fail to disclose a conflict of interest they may have during a board meeting; (iii) knowingly favor a particular shareholder of the Company against the interests of other shareholders; (iv) approve related party transactions without complying with the requirements of the Mexican Securities Law; (v) use Company assets in a manner which infringes upon the policies approved by the board of directors; (vi) unlawfully use material non-public information of the Company; and/or (vii) usurp a corporate business opportunity for their own benefit, or the benefit of a third party, without the prior approval of the board of directors.  Our directors may be liable for damages when breaching their duty of loyalty if such failure causes economic damage to the Company or our subsidiaries.

Civil Actions Against Directors

Under Mexican law, shareholders can initiate actions for civil liabilities against directors through resolutions passed by a majority of the shareholders at a general ordinary shareholders’ meeting.  In the event the majority of the shareholders decide to bring such action, the director against whom such action is brought will immediately cease to be a member of the board of directors.  Additionally, shareholders representing not less than 5% of our outstanding shares may directly bring such action against directors.  Any recovery of damages with respect to such action will be for our benefit and not for the benefit of the shareholders bringing the action.

Chief Executive Officer

According to our bylaws and the Mexican Securities Law, the Chief Executive Officer shall be in charge of running, conducting and executing the Company’s business, complying with the strategies, policies and guidelines approved by the board of directors.

For the performance of its duties the Chief Executive Officer shall: (i) submit, for the approval of the board of directors, the business strategies of the Company; (ii) execute the resolutions of the Shareholders’ Meetings and of the board of directors; (iii) propose to the Audit Committee, the internal control system and internal audit guidelines of the Company, as well as execute the guidelines approved thereof by the board of directors; (iv) disclose any material information and events that should be disclosed to the investor public; (v) comply with the provisions relevant to the repurchase and placement transactions of the Company’s own stock; (vi) exert any corresponding corrective measures and liability suits; (vii) assure that adequate accounting, registry and information systems are maintained by the Company; (viii) prepare and submit to the board of directors his annual report; (ix) establish mechanisms and internal controls permitting certification that the actions and transactions of the Company conform to the applicable regulations; and (x) exercise his right to file the liability suits referred to in the Mexican Securities Law against related parties or third parties that allegedly cause damage to the Company.

67

Voting Rights and Shareholders’ Meetings

Each share entitles the holder thereof to one vote at any general meeting of our shareholders.  Shareholders may vote by proxy.  At the ordinary general shareholders’ meeting, any shareholder or group of shareholders representing 10% or more of the outstanding capital stock has the right to appoint one director and his corresponding alternate, with the remaining directors being elected by majority vote.

General shareholders’ meetings may be ordinary or extraordinary.  Extraordinary general shareholders’ meetings are called to consider matters specified in Article 182 of the Mexican Corporations Law, including, principally, changes in the authorized fixed share capital and other amendments to the bylaws, the issuance of preferred stock, the liquidation, merger and spin-off of the Company, changes in the rights of security holders, and transformation from one corporate form to another.  All other matters may be approved by an ordinary general shareholders’ meetings.  Ordinary general shareholders’ meetings must be called to consider and approve matters specified in Article 181 of the Mexican Corporations Law, including, principally, the appointment of the members of the board of directors and the Chairman of the Audit and Corporate Governance Committees, the compensation paid to the directors, the distribution of our profits for the previous year, and the annual reports presented by the board of directors and the Chief Executive Officer.  Our shareholders establish the number of members that will serve on our board of directors at the ordinary general shareholders’ meeting.

A general ordinary shareholders’ meeting must be held during the first four months after the end of each fiscal year.  In order to attend a general shareholders’ meeting, the day before the meeting shareholders must deposit the certificates representing their capital stock or other appropriate evidence of ownership either with the secretary of our board of directors, with a credit institution, or with Indeval.  The secretary, credit institution or Indeval will hold the certificates until after the general shareholders’ meeting has taken place.

Under our bylaws, the quorum for an ordinary general shareholders’ meeting is at least 50% of the outstanding capital stock, and action may be taken by the affirmative vote of holders representing a majority of the shares present.  If a quorum is not present, a subsequent meeting may be called at which the shareholders present, whatever their number, will constitute a quorum and action may be taken by a majority of the shares present.  A quorum for extraordinary general shareholders’ meetings is at least 75% of the outstanding capital stock, but if a quorum is not present, a subsequent meeting may be called.  A quorum for the subsequent meeting is at least 50% of the outstanding shares.  Action at an extraordinary general shareholders’ meeting may only be taken by a vote of holders representing at least 50% of the outstanding shares.

Shareholders’ meetings may be called by the board of directors, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, the  Audit and/or Corporate Governance Committees, or a court.  The Chairman of the board of directors or the Chairman of the Audit or Corporate Governance Committees may be required to call a shareholders’ meeting if holders of at least 10% of our outstanding share capital request a meeting in writing, or at the written request of any shareholder if no shareholders’ meeting has been held for two consecutive years, or, if during a period of two consecutive years, the board of directors’ annual report for the previous year and the Company’s financial statements were not presented to the shareholders, or if the shareholders did not elect directors.

Notice of shareholders’ meetings must be published in the Federal Official Gazette or in a newspaper of general circulation in San Pedro Garza García, Nuevo León at least 15 days prior to the meeting.  Shareholders’ meetings may be held without such publication provided that 100% of the outstanding shares are represented.  Shareholders’ meetings must be held within the corporate domicile in San Pedro Garza García, Nuevo León.

Under Mexican law, holders of 20% of our outstanding capital stock may have any shareholder action set aside by filing a complaint with a Mexican court of competent jurisdiction within 15 days after the close of the meeting at which such action was taken, by showing that the challenged action violates Mexican law or our bylaws.  Relief under these provisions is only available to holders who were entitled to vote on the challenged shareholder action and whose shares were not represented when the action was taken or, if represented, voted against it.

Dividend Rights and Distribution

Within the first four months of each year, the board of directors must submit our company’s financial statements for the preceding fiscal year to the shareholders for their approval at the ordinary general shareholders’ meeting.  They are required by law to allocate 5% of any new profits to a legal reserve which is not thereafter available for distribution until the amount of the legal reserve equals 20% of our capital stock (before adjusting for inflation).  Amounts in excess of those allocated to the legal reserve fund may be allocated to other reserve funds as the shareholders determine, including a reserve for the repurchase of our shares.  The remaining balance of new profits, if any, is available for distribution as dividends prior to their approval at the shareholders’ meeting.  Cash dividends on the shares held through Indeval will be distributed by us through Indeval.  Cash dividends on the shares evidenced by

68

physical certificates will be paid when the relevant dividend coupon registered in the name of its holder is delivered to us.  No dividends may be paid, however, unless losses for prior fiscal years have been paid up or absorbed.  See “Item 3.  Key Information—Selected Financial Data—Dividends.”

Liquidation

Upon our dissolution, one or more liquidators must be appointed by an extraordinary shareholders’ general meeting to wind up its affairs.  If the extraordinary general shareholders’ meeting does not make said appointment, a Civil or District Judge can do so at the request of any shareholder.  All fully paid and outstanding common stock will be entitled to participate equally in any distribution upon liquidation after the payment of the Company’s debts, taxes and the expenses of the liquidation.  Common stock that has not been paid in full will be entitled to these proceeds in proportion to the paid-in amount.

If the extraordinary general shareholders’ meeting does not give express instructions on liquidation, the bylaws stipulate that the liquidators will (i) conclude all pending matters they deem most convenient, (ii) prepare a general balance and inventory, (iii) collect all credits and pay all debts by selling assets necessary to accomplish this task, (iv) sell assets and distribute income, and (v) distribute the amount remaining, if any, pro rata among the shareholders.

Changes in Capital Stock

Our outstanding capital stock consists of Class I and Class II series B shares.  Class I shares are the fixed portion of our capital stock and have no par value.  Class II shares are the variable portion of our capital stock and have no par value.  The fixed portion of our capital stock cannot be withdrawn.  The issuance of variable capital shares, unlike the issuance of fixed capital shares, does not require an amendment of the bylaws, although it does require approval at an ordinary general shareholders’ meeting.  The fixed portion of our capital stock may only be increased or decreased by resolution of an extraordinary general shareholders’ meeting and an amendment to our bylaws, whereas the variable portion of our capital stock may be increased or decreased by resolution of an ordinary general shareholders’ meetings.  Currently, our outstanding capital stock consists only of fixed capital.

An increase of capital stock may generally be made through the issuance of new shares for payment in cash or in kind, by capitalization of indebtedness or by capitalization of certain items of shareholders’ equity.  An increase of capital stock generally may not be made until all previously issued and subscribed shares of capital stock have been fully paid.  A reduction of capital stock may be effected to absorb losses, to redeem shares, to repurchase shares in the market or to release shareholders from payments not made.

As of April 25, 2014, our capital stock was represented by 432,749,079 issued Series B shares, all of them fully subscribed and paid.

Preemptive Rights

In the event of a capital increase through the issuance of shares, other than in connection with a public offering of newly issued shares or treasury stock, a holder of existing shares of a given series at the time of the capital increase has a preferential right to subscribe for a sufficient number of new shares of the same series to maintain the holder’s existing proportionate holdings of shares of that series.  Preemptive rights must be exercised within the period and under the conditions established for such purpose by the shareholders at the corresponding shareholders’ meeting.  Under Mexican law and our bylaws, the exercise period may not be less than 15 days following the publication of notice of the capital increase in the Federal Official Gazette or following the date of the shareholders’ meeting at which the capital increase was approved if all shareholders were represented; otherwise such rights will lapse.

Furthermore, shareholders will not have preemptive rights to subscribe for common stock issued in connection with mergers, upon the conversion of convertible debentures, or in the resale of treasury stock as a result of repurchases on the Mexican Stock Exchange.

Under Mexican law, preemptive rights may not be waived in advance by a shareholder, except under limited circumstances, and cannot be represented by an instrument that is negotiable separately from the corresponding share.  Holders of ADRs may be restricted in their ability to participate in the exercise of preemptive rights.  See “Item 3.  Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Controlling Shareholders and Capital Structure—Holders of ADSs May Not Be Able to Participate in Any Future Preemptive Rights Offering and as a Result May Be Subject to a Dilution of Equity Interest.”

69

Restrictions Affecting Non-Mexican Shareholders

Foreign investment in capital stock of Mexican corporations is regulated by the 1993 Foreign Investment Law and by the 1998 Foreign Investment Regulations to the extent they are not inconsistent with the Foreign Investment Law.  The Ministry of Economy and the National Commission on Foreign Investment are responsible for the administration of the Foreign Investment Law and the Foreign Investment Regulations.

Our bylaws do not restrict the participation of non-Mexican investors in our capital stock.  However, approval of the National Foreign Investment Commission must be obtained for foreign investors to acquire a direct or indirect participation in excess of 49% of the capital stock of a Mexican company that has an aggregate asset value that exceeds, at the time of filing the corresponding notice of acquisition, an amount determined annually by the National Foreign Investment Commission.

As required by Mexican law, our bylaws provide that any non-Mexicans who acquire an interest or participation in our capital at any time will be treated as having Mexican nationality for purposes of their interest in us, and with respect to the property, rights, concessions, participations or interests that we may own or rights and obligations that are based on contracts to which we are a party with the Mexican authorities.  Such shareholders cannot invoke the protection of their government under penalty of forfeiting to the Mexican State the ownership interest that they may have acquired.

Under this provision, a non-Mexican shareholder is deemed to have agreed not to invoke the protection of his own government with respect to his rights as a shareholder, but is not deemed to have waived any other rights he may have with respect to its investment in us, including any rights under U.S. securities laws.  If a shareholder should invoke governmental protection in violation of this provision, his shares could be forfeited to the Mexican government.  Mexican law requires that such a provision be included in the bylaws of all Mexican companies unless such bylaws prohibit ownership of shares by non-Mexicans.  See “Item 3.  Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Controlling Shareholders and Capital Structure—Mexican Law Restricts the Ability of Non-Mexican Shareholders to Invoke the Protection of Their Governments with Respect to Their Rights as Shareholders.”

Registration and Transfer

Our shares are evidenced by certificates in registered form.  We maintain a stock registry and, in accordance with Mexican law, only those persons whose names are recorded on the stock registry are recognized as owners of the series B shares.

Other Provisions

Appraisal Rights

Under Mexican law, whenever the shareholders approve a change of corporate purpose, change of our nationality or transformation from one type of corporate form to another, any shareholder entitled to vote on such change or transformation who has voted against it has the right to tender its shares and receive the amount attributable to its shares, provided such shareholder exercises its right to withdraw within 15 days following the adjournment of the meeting at which the change or transformation was approved.  Under Mexican law, the amount which a withdrawing shareholder is entitled to receive is equal to its proportionate interest in our capital stock according to our most recent balance sheet approved by an ordinary general shareholders’ meeting.  The reimbursement may have certain tax consequences.

Share Repurchases

We may repurchase our common stock on the Mexican Stock Exchange at any time at the then market price.  The repurchase of shares will be made by charging our equity, in which case we may keep them without reducing our capital stock, or charging our capital stock, in which case we must convert them into unsubscribed treasury stock.  The ordinary general shareholders’ meeting shall determine the maximum amount of funds to be allocated for the repurchase of shares, which amount shall not exceed our total net profits, including retained earnings.

Repurchased common stock will either be held by us or kept in our treasury, pending future sales thereof through the Mexican Stock Exchange.  If the repurchased shares are kept in our treasury, we may not exercise their economic and voting rights, and such shares will not be deemed to be outstanding for purposes of calculating any quorum or voting at any shareholders’ meeting.  The repurchased shares held by us as treasury shares may not be represented at any shareholder meeting.  The decrease or increase of our capital stock as a result of the repurchase does not require the approval of a shareholders’ meeting or of the board of directors.

70

Under Mexican securities regulation, our directors, officers, external auditors, the secretary of the board of directors and holders of 10% or more of our outstanding stock may not sell stock to us, or purchase repurchased stock from us, unless the sale or purchase is made through a tender offer.  The repurchase of stock representing 3% or more of our outstanding share capital in any 20 trading-day period must be conducted through a public tender offer.

Repurchase in the Event of Delisting

In the event of the cancellation of the registration of our shares at the Registro Nacional de Valores, or National Registry of Securities, or RNV, whether at our request or at the request of the CNBV, under our bylaws and the regulations of the CNBV, we will be obligated to make a tender offer to purchase all of our shares held by non-controlling shareholders.  Such tender offer shall be made at least at the greater price of the following: (i) the closing sale price under the terms of the following paragraph, or (ii) the book value of the shares according to the most recent quarterly report submitted to the CNBV and the Mexican Stock Exchange.

The quoted share price on the Mexican Stock Exchange referred to in the preceding paragraph shall be the weighted average share price as quoted on the Mexican Stock Exchange for the last 30 days in which our shares were traded, in a period not greater than six months prior to the date of the public tender offer.  If the number of days in which our shares have traded during the period referred to above is less than 30, then only the actual number of days in which our shares have traded during such period will be taken into account.  If shares have not been exchanged during such period, then the tender offer shall be made at a price equal to at least the book value of the shares.

In connection with any such cancellation of the registration of our shares, we will be required to deposit sufficient funds into a trust account for at least six months following the date of cancellation to ensure adequate resources to purchase at the public tender offer price any remaining outstanding shares from non-controlling shareholders that did not participate in the offer.

If we ask the RNV to cancel the registration of our shares, we will be exempt from carrying out a public tender offer, provided that: (i) we have the consent of the holders of at least 95% of our outstanding common shares, by a resolution at a shareholders’ meeting; (ii) the aggregate amount offered for the securities in the market is less than 300,000 investment units (UDIs); (iii) the trust referred to in the preceding paragraph is executed, and (iv) notice is given to the CNBV of the execution and cancellation of the trust through the established electronic means.

Within ten business days of the commencement of a public tender offer, our board of directors must prepare and disclose to public investors its opinion with respect to the reasonableness of the tender offer price as well as any conflicts of interest that its members may have in connection with the tender offer.  The opinion of the board of directors may be accompanied by another opinion issued by an independent expert that we may hire.

We may request the approval from the CNBV to use different criteria to determine the price of the shares.  In requesting such approval, the following must be submitted to the CNBV: (i) the resolution of the board of directors approving such request, (ii) the opinion of the Corporate Governance Committee addressing the reasons why it deems appropriate the use of a different price, and (iii) a report from an independent expert indicating that the price is consistent with the terms of the Mexican Securities Law.

Shareholder’s Conflicts of Interest

Any shareholder that has a direct or indirect conflict of interest with respect to any transaction must abstain from voting thereon at the relevant shareholders’ meeting.  A shareholder that votes on a business transaction in which its interest conflicts with ours may be liable for damages if the transaction would not have been approved without such shareholder’s vote.

Rights of Shareholders

The protections afforded to minority shareholders under Mexican law are different from those in the United States and other jurisdictions.  The law concerning duties and responsibilities of directors and controlling shareholders has not been the subject of extensive judicial interpretation in Mexico, unlike the United States where judicial decisions have been issued regarding the duties of diligence and loyalty, which more effectively protect the rights of minority shareholders.  Additionally, shareholder class actions are not available under Mexican law and there are different procedural requirements for bringing shareholder derivative lawsuits, which permit shareholders in U.S. courts to bring actions on behalf of other shareholders or to enforce rights of the corporation itself.  Shareholders cannot challenge corporate action taken at a shareholders’ meeting unless they meet certain procedural requirements.

In addition, under U.S. securities laws, as a foreign private issuer we are exempt from certain rules that apply to domestic U.S. issuers with equity securities registered under the Exchange Act, including the proxy solicitation rules, the rules requiring

71

disclosure of share ownership by directors, officers and certain shareholders.  We are also exempt from certain of the corporate governance requirements of the New York Stock Exchange, including certain requirements concerning audit committees and independent directors.  A summary of significant ways in which our corporate governance standards differ from those followed by U.S. companies pursuant to NYSE listing standards is available on our website at www.gruma.com.  The information found at this website is not incorporated by reference into this document.

As a result of these factors, in practice it may be more difficult for our minority shareholders to enforce rights against us or our directors or controlling shareholders than it would be for shareholders of a U.S. company.  See “Item 3.  Key Information—Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Controlling Shareholders and Capital Structure—The Protections Afforded to Minority Shareholders in Mexico Are Different From Those in the United States.”

Antitakeover Protections

Our bylaws provide that, subject to certain exceptions as explained below, prior written approval from the board of directors shall be required for any person (as defined hereunder), or group of persons to acquire, directly or indirectly, any of our common shares or rights to our common shares, by any means or under any title whether in a single event or in a set of consecutive events, such that its total shares or rights to shares would represent 5% or more of our outstanding shares.

Prior approval from the board of directors must be obtained each time such ownership threshold (and multiples thereof) is intended to be exceeded, except for persons who, directly or indirectly, are competitors (as such term is defined below) of the Company or of any of its subsidiaries, who must obtain the prior approval of the board of directors for future acquisitions where a threshold of 2% (or multiples thereof) of our common shares is intended to be exceeded.

Pursuant to our bylaws, a “person” is defined as any natural person, corporate entity, trust or similar form of venture, vehicle, entity, corporation or economic or mercantile association or any subsidiaries or affiliates of any of the former or, as determined by the board of directors, any group of persons who may be acting jointly, coordinated or as a whole; and a “competitor” is defined as any person engaged, directly or indirectly, in (i) the business of production and/or marketing of corn or wheat flour, and/or (ii) any other activity carried on by the Company or by any of its subsidiaries or affiliates.

Persons that acquire our common shares in violation of these requirements will not be considered the beneficial owners of such shares under our bylaws and will not be able to vote such shares or receive any dividends, distributions or other rights in respect of these shares.  In addition, pursuant to our bylaws, these holders will be obligated to pay us a penalty in an amount equal to the greater of (i) the market value of the shares such party acquired without obtaining the prior approval of the board of directors and (ii) the market value of shares representing 5% of our capital stock.

Board Notices, Meetings, Quorum Requirements and Approvals.  To obtain the prior approval of our board of directors, a potential purchaser must properly deliver a written application complying with the applicable requirements set forth in our bylaws.  Such application shall state, among other things: (i) the number and class of our shares the person beneficially owns or to which such person has any right, (ii) the number and class of shares the Person intends to acquire, (iii) the number and class of shares with respect to which such Person intends to acquire any right, (iv) the percentage that the shares referred to in (i) represent of our total outstanding shares and of the class or series to which such shares belong, (v) the percentage that the shares referred to in (ii) and (iii) represent of our total outstanding shares and of the class or series to which such shares belong, (vi) the person’s identity and nationality, or in the case of a purchaser which is a corporation, trust or legal entity, the nationality and identity of its shareholders, partners or beneficiaries as well as the identity and nationality of each person effectively controlling such corporation, trust or legal entity, (vii) the reasons and purpose behind such acquisition, (viii) if such person is, directly or indirectly, a competitor of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates, and if such person has the authority to legally acquire the shares pursuant to our bylaws and Mexican law, (ix) its source of financing the intended acquisition, (x) if the Person is part of an economic group, formed by one or more of its related parties, which intends to acquire shares of our common stock or rights to such shares, (xi) if the person has obtained any financing from one of its related parties for the payment of the shares, (xii) the identity and nationality of the financial institution, if any, that will act as the underwriter or broker in connection with any tender offer, and (xiii) the person’s address for receiving notices.

Either the Chairman, the Secretary or the Alternate Secretary of our board of directors must call a meeting of the board of directors within 10 business days following the receipt of the written application.  The notices for the meeting of the board of directors shall be in writing and sent to each of the directors and their alternates at least 45 calendar days prior to the meeting.  Action by unanimous written consent is not permitted.

Any acquisition of capital shares representing at least 2% or 5%, as the case may be, of our outstanding capital stock, must be approved by at least the majority of the members of our board of directors present at a meeting at which at least the majority of the members is present.  Such acquisitions must be resolved by our board of directors within 60 calendar days following the receipt of the

72

written application described above, unless the board of directors determines that it does not have sufficient information upon which to base its decision.  In such case, the board of directors shall deliver a written request to the potential purchaser for any additional information that it deems necessary to make its determination.  The 60 calendar days referred to above will commence following the receipt of the additional information from the potential purchaser.

Mandatory Tender Offers in the Case of Certain Acquisitions.  If our board of directors authorizes an acquisition of capital shares which increases the purchaser’s ownership to 30% or more, but not more than 50%, of our capital stock, then the purchaser must effect its acquisition by way of a cash tender offer for a specified number of shares equal to the greater of (i) the percentage of common shares intended to be acquired or (ii) 10% of our outstanding capital stock, in accordance with the applicable Mexican securities regulations.

No approval of the board of directors will be required if the acquisition would increase the purchaser’s ownership to more than 50% of our capital stock or result in a change of control, in which case the purchaser must effect its acquisition by way of a tender offer for 100% minus one of our total outstanding capital stock, which tender shall be made pursuant to applicable Mexican laws.

The aforementioned tender offers must be made simultaneously in the Mexican and US stock markets.  Furthermore, an opinion issued by the board of directors regarding any such tender offer must be made available to the public through the authorized means of communication within 10 days after commencement of the tender offer.  In the event of any tender offer, the shareholders shall have the right to hear more competitive offers.

Notices.  In addition to the aforementioned approvals, if a person increases its beneficial ownership by 1% in the case of competitors, or 2% in the case of non-competitors, written notice must be submitted to the board of directors within five days of reaching or exceeding such thresholds.

Exceptions.  The provisions of our bylaws summarized above will not apply to: (i) transfers of shares by operation of the laws of succession; (ii) acquisitions of shares by (a) any person who, directly or indirectly, has the authority or possibility of appointing the majority of the directors of our board of directors, (b) any company, trusts or similar form of venture, vehicle, entity, corporation or economic or mercantile association, which may be under the control of the aforementioned person, (c) the heirs of the aforementioned person, (d) the aforementioned person when such person is repurchasing the shares of any corporation, trust or similar form of venture, vehicle, entity, corporation or economic or mercantile association referred to in the item (b) above, and (e) the Company or by trusts created by the Company; (iii) any person(s) that as of December 4, 2003 hold(s), directly or indirectly, more than 20% of the shares representing the Company’s capital stock; and (iv) any other exceptions provided for in the Mexican Securities Law and other applicable legal dispositions.

MATERIAL CONTRACTS

Archer-Daniels-Midland

As part of the ADM Transaction we entered into an Equity Purchase Agreement by and among Archer-Daniels-Midland, ADM Milling Co., ADM Bio Productos, S.A. de C.V. and Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V., dated December 14, 2012, in order to acquire all of the Equity Interests previously held by Archer-Daniels-Midland in our Company (the “Equity Purchase Agreement”).

In addition to the U.S.$450 million paid to Archer-Daniels-Midland in exchange of the Equity Interests, the Equity Purchase Agreement provides that we must pay a contingent payment of up to U.S.$60 million to Archer-Daniels-Midland, which contingent payment is payable only if during the 42 months following the closing of the ADM Transaction (ending on June 14, 2016), certain conditions take place in connection with (i) the increase in the price of the Company´s stock, over the closing price of the Company´s stock determined for purposes of the ADM Transaction (the “Closing Price”), at the end of the 42 months period; (ii) the difference between the price of the Company´s stock established for public offers made by us and the Closing Price; (iii) the acquisition, by a strategic investor, of 15% or more of the Company´s capital stock; or (iv) the reduction of the percentage of the Company´s shares that are considered to be held by the public at any time, starting from 26%. See “Item 4.  Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Share Purchase Transaction with Archer-Daniels-Midland.”

We maintain a reserve in the event that any or all of the aforementioned contingent payment is made to Archer-Daniels-Midland. See Note 3 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

73

Perpetual Bonds

On December 3, 2004, Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. issued U.S.$300 million 7.75% senior unsecured perpetual bonds, which at the time were rated BBB- by Standard & Poor’s Ratings and by Fitch.  The bonds which have no fixed final maturity date, have a call option exercisable by GRUMA at any time beginning five years after the issue date. As of December 31, 2013 we have not hedged any interest payments on our U.S.$300 million 7.75% senior unsecured perpetual bonds.

Rabobank Syndicated Facility

In June 2013, the Company obtained a 5-year Syndicated Credit Facility for U.S.$220 million with Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen Boerenleenbank B.A., “Rabobank Nederland”, New York Branch, as administrative agent, with an average life of 4.2 years and amortizations starting on December 2014. This facility has an interest rate based on LIBOR plus a spread between 150 and 300 basis points based on the Company’s leverage ratio. BBVA Bancomer, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero BBVA Bancomer and Bank of America, N.A., also participated in this facility. The Rabobank Syndicated Facility contains covenants that require us to maintain a ratio of consolidated EBITDA to interest charges of not less than 2.5:1, and to maintain a maximum ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA of not more than 4.75:1 from June 18, 2013 until September 30, 2013; 4.50:1 from October 1, 2013 until September 30, 2014; 4.0:1 from October 1, 2014 until September 30, 2015; and 3.5:1 from October 1, 2015 and thereafter. The Rabobank Syndicated Facility also limits our ability, and our subsidiaries’ ability in certain cases, among other things, to, create liens, make certain investments, merge or consolidate with other companies or sell substantially all of our assets, make certain restricted payments, enter into agreements that prohibit the payment of dividends, engage in transactions with affiliates and enter into certain hedging transactions. Aditionally, the Rabobank Syndicated Facility limits our subsidiaries’ ability to guarantee certain additional indebtedness and to incur additional indebtedness under certain circumstances.

Inbursa Pesos Syndicated Facility

In June 2013, the Company obtained a 5-year Syndicated Credit Facility for Ps.2,300 million with Inbursa, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero Inbursa, as administrative agent, with an average life of 4.2 years and amortizations starting on December 2014. The facility has an interest rate of 91-day TIIE plus a spread between 162.5 and 262.5 basis points based on the Company’s leverage ratio. Banco Nacional de Comercio Exterior, S.N.C., Banca de Desarrollo and HSBC México, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero HSBC, also participated in this facility. The Inbursa Peso Syndicated Facility contains covenants that require us to maintain a ratio of consolidated EBITDA to interest charges of not less than 2.5:1, and to maintain a maximum ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA of not more than 4.75:1 from June 12, 2013 until September 30, 2013; 4.50:1 from October 1, 2013 until September 30, 2014; 4.0:1 from October 1, 2014 until September 30, 2015; and 3.5:1 from October 1, 2015 and thereafter. This facility also limits our ability and our subsidiaries’ ability in certain cases, among other things, to create liens; make certain investments, merge or consolidate with other companies or sell substantially all of our assets, make certain restricted payments, enter into agreements that prohibit the payment of dividends, engage in transactions with affiliates and enter into certain hedging transactions. Aditionally, the Inbursa Peso Syndicated Facility limits our subsidiaries’ ability to guarantee certain additional indebtedness and to incur additional indebtedness under certain circumstances.

Gruma Corporation Loan Facility

In October 2006, Gruma Corporation entered into a U.S.$100 million 5-year revolving credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions, which was refinanced and extended to U.S.$200 million for an additional 5-year term on June 20, 2011.  The facility, as refinanced in 2011, has an interest rate based on LIBOR plus a spread of 1.375% to 2% that fluctuates in relation to Gruma Corporations leverage and contains less restrictive provisions than those in the facility replaced.  In November, 2012 we increased the aggregate commitment under this facility up to the maximum permitted amount of US $250,000,000.  The additional US $50,000,000 were used by Gruma Corporation to cover part of the purchase price under the ADM Transaction, specifically the purchase of ADM’s stake in Azteca Milling. This facility contains covenants that limit Gruma Corporation’s ability to merge or consolidate, and require it to maintain a ratio of total funded debt to consolidated EBITDA of not more than 3.0:1.  In addition, this facility limits Gruma Corporation’s, and certain of its subsidiaries’ ability, among other things, to create liens; make certain investments; make certain restricted payments; enter into any agreements that prohibit the payment of dividends; and engage in transactions with affiliates.  This facility also limits Gruma Corporation’s subsidiaries’ ability to incur additional debt.

Gruma Corporation is also subject to covenants which limit the amounts that may be advanced to, loaned to, or invested in us under certain circumstances.  Upon the occurrence of any default or event of default under its credit agreements, Gruma Corporation generally would be prohibited from making any cash dividend payments to us.  The covenants described above and other covenants could limit our and Gruma Corporation’s ability to help support our liquidity and capital resource requirements.

74

Syndicated Loan Facility

On March 22, 2011 we obtained a U.S.$225 million, five-year senior credit facility through a syndicate of banks.  The Syndicated Loan Facility consists of a term loan (“Term Loan Facility”) and a revolving loan facility (the “Revolving Loan Facility”).  Prior to the execution of the 2012 Bridge Loan Facility mentioned above, the permitted leverage ratio established under the Syndicated Loan Facility was increased, and the interest rate grid was also modified, among other revisions made through the execution of an amendment dated December 3, 2012. After such amendment, the interest rate for the Term Loan Facility and for the Revolving Loan Facility is either (i) LIBOR or (ii) an interest rate determined by the administrative agent based on its “prime rate” or the federal funds rate, respectively, plus, in either case, (a) 3.00% if the Company’s ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA (the “Maximum Leverage Ratio”) is greater than or equal to 4.5x, (b) 2.75% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 4.0x and less than 4.5x, (c) 2.50% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 3.5x and less than 4.0x; (d) 2.25% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 3.0x and less than 3.5x; (e) 2.00% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 2.5x and less than 3.0x; (f) 1.75% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 2.0x and less than 2.5x; and (g) 1.50% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is less than 2.0x.  The Syndicated Loan Facility (as amended) contains covenants that require the Company to maintain a ratio of consolidated EBITDA to interest charges of not less than 2.5:1, and a Maximum Leverage Ratio of not more than 4.75:1 from December 4, 2012 until September 30, 2013; 4.50:1 from October 1, 2013 until September 30, 2014; 4.0:1 from October 1, 2014 until September 30, 2015; and 3.5:1 from October 1, 2015 and thereafter.  The Syndicated Loan Facility (as amended) also limits our ability, and our subsidiaries’ ability in certain cases, among other things, to: create liens; make certain investments or other restricted payments; merge or consolidate with other companies or sell substantially all of our assets; and enter into certain hedging transactions.  Additionally, the Syndicated Loan Facility (as amended) limits our subsidiaries’ ability to guarantee additional indebtedness issued by the Company and to incur additional indebtedness under certain circumstances.

Peso Syndicated Loan Facility

On June 15, 2011 we obtained a Ps.1,200 million, seven-year senior credit facility through a syndicate of banks.  The Peso Syndicated Loan Facility consists of a term loan maturing in June 2018 with yearly principal amortizations beginning in December 2015. Prior to the execution of the 2012 Bridge Loan Facility mentioned above, the permitted leverage ratio established under the Peso Syndicated Loan Facility was increased, and the interest rate grid was also modified, among other revisions made through the execution of an amendment dated December 3, 2012. After such amendment, the interest rate payable under the Peso Syndicated Loan Facility is the 91-day TIIE plus a spread between 137.5 and 262.5 basis points based on the Company’s ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA.  The Peso Syndicated Loan Facility (as amended) contains covenants that require the Company to maintain a ratio of consolidated EBITDA to interest charges of not less than 2.5:1, and to maintain a maximum ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA of not more than 4.75:1 from December 4, 2012 until September 30, 2013; 4.50:1 from October 1, 2013 until September 30, 2014; 4.0:1 from October 1, 2014 until September 30, 2015; and 3.5:1 from October 1, 2015 and thereafter. The Peso Syndicated Loan Facility (as amended) also limits our ability, and our subsidiaries’ ability in certain cases, among other things, to: create liens; make certain investments or other restricted payments; merge or consolidate with other companies or sell substantially all of our assets; and enter into certain hedging transactions.  Additionally, the Peso Syndicated Loan Facility (as amended) limits our subsidiaries’ ability to guarantee additional indebtedness issued by the Company and to incur additional indebtedness under certain circumstances.

Rabobank Loan Facility

On June 15, 2011 we obtained a U.S.$50 million, five-year senior credit facility from Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A.. On June 28, 2012, this facility was increased by U.S.$50 million to a total principal amount of U.S. $100 million.  Also, prior to the execution of the 2012 Bridge Loan Facility, the permitted leverage ratio established under the Rabobank Loan Facility was increased, and the interest rate grid was modified, among other revisions made through the execution of an amendment dated November 29, 2012. After such amendments, the Rabobank Loan Facility consists of a revolving loan facility, at in interest rate of LIBOR plus (a) 3.00% if the Company’s ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA is greater than or equal to 4.5x, (b) 2.75% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 4.0x and less than 4.5x, (c) 2.50% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 3.5x and less than 4.0x; (d) 2.25% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 3.0x and less than 3.5x; (e) 2.00% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 2.5x and less than 3.0x; (f) 1.75% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is greater than or equal to 2.0x and less than 2.5x; and (g) 1.50% if the Company’s Maximum Leverage Ratio is less than 2.0x.  The Rabobank Loan Facility (as amended) contains covenants that require the Company to maintain a ratio of consolidated EBITDA to interest charges of not less than 2.5:1, and a Maximum Leverage Ratio of not more than 4.75:1 from December 4, 2012 until September 30, 2013; 4.50:1 from October 1, 2013 until September 30, 2014; 4.0:1 from October 1, 2014 until September 30, 2015; and 3.5:1 from October 1, 2015 and thereafter. The Rabobank Loan Facility (as amended) also limits our ability, and our subsidiaries’ ability in certain cases, among other things, to: create liens; make certain investments or other restricted payments; merge or consolidate with other companies or sell

75

substantially all of our assets; and enter into certain hedging transactions.  Additionally, the Rabobank Loan Facility (as amended) limits our subsidiaries’ ability to guarantee additional indebtedness issued by the Company and to incur additional indebtedness under certain circumstances.

2011 Bancomext Peso Facility

On June 16, 2011 we obtained a Ps.600 million, seven-year senior credit facility from Bancomext (Banco Nacional de Comercio Exterior).  Prior to the execution of the 2012 Bridge Loan Facility mentioned above, the permitted leverage ratio established under the 2011 Bancomext Peso Facility was increased, and the interest rate grid was modified, among other revisions made through the execution of an amendment dated December 7, 2012. After such amendment, the 2011 Bancomext Peso Facility consists of a term loan maturing in June 2018 at an interest rate of 91-day TIIE plus a spread between 137.5 and 262.5 basis points based on the Company’s ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA.  The 2011Bancomext Peso Facility contains a covenant that requires us to maintain a ratio of consolidated EBITDA to interest charges of not less than 2.5:1 as well as a covenant that requires us to maintain a maximum ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA of not more than 4.75:1 from December 8, 2012 until September 30, 2013; 4.50:1 from October 1, 2013 until September 30, 2014; 4.0:1 from October 1, 2014 until September 30, 2015; and 3.5:1 from October 1, 2015 and thereafter.  The 2011Bancomext Peso Facility also limits our ability, and our subsidiaries’ ability in certain cases to create liens.

On December 8, 2012 we entered into an amendment to this Facility in order to increase the existing permitted Leverage Ratio from December 8, 2012 until September 30, 2013, to equal or less than 4.75x; from October 1, 2013 until September 30, 2014, to equal or less than 4.5x; from October 1, 2014 until September 30, 2015, to equal or less than 4.0x and from October 1, 2015 and thereafter, to equal or less than 3.5x.

MASECA® Trademark License Agreement

On November 29, 2013, we entered into an agreement with GIMSA in connection with the trademark  MASECA®, through which GRUMA granted GIMSA the license to exclusively use the trademark MASECA® in Mexico for a term of 6 years. In consideration, GRUMA  collected from GIMSA a  fixed net royalty for the following six years equivalent to Ps.390.5 million per year, after  a 12.75% discount rate for early payment. Therefore, on December 19, 2013, GIMSA paid GRUMA Ps.2,343 million.

In turn, in order to support GIMSA in its efforts to promote the MASECA® trademark in Mexico, GRUMA will contribute 0.75% of the annual net sales of GIMSA during each year of the term of the referred agreement, as a contribution for advertising and publicity expenses.

EXCHANGE CONTROLS

Mexican law does not restrict our ability to remit dividends and interest payments, if any, to Mexican or non-Mexican holders of our securities.  Payments of dividends to equity holders generally will be subject to Mexican withholding tax. See “Taxation — Mexican Tax Considerations — Payment of Dividends.” Mexico has had a free market for foreign exchange since 1991, and the government has allowed the peso to float freely against the U.S. dollar since December 1994.

TAXATION

The following summary contains a description of certain Mexican federal and U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Series B Shares or Series B Share ADSs (which are evidenced by ADRs), but it does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to purchase or hold Series B Shares or ADSs.

The Convention for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and Protocols thereto, or the Tax Treaty, between the United States and Mexico entered into force on January 1, 1994.  The United States and Mexico have also entered into an agreement concerning the exchange of information with respect to tax matters.

The summary is based upon tax laws of the United States and Mexico as in effect on the date of this document, which are subject to change, including changes that may have retroactive effect.  Holders of Series B Shares or ADSs should consult their own tax advisers as to the Mexican, U.S. or other tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of shares or ADSs, including, in particular, the effect of any foreign, state or local tax laws.

76

Mexican Tax Considerations

The following is a general summary of the principal consequences under the Ley del Impuesto sobre la Renta, or Mexican Income Tax Law, and rules and regulations thereunder, as currently in effect, of an investment in Series B Shares or ADSs by a holder that is not a resident of Mexico and that will not hold Series B Shares or ADSs or a beneficial interest therein in connection with the conduct of a trade or business through a permanent establishment in Mexico.

For purposes of Mexican taxation, a natural person is a resident of Mexico for tax purposes if he has established his home in Mexico, unless he has resided in another country for more than 183 days, whether consecutive or not, in any one calendar year and can demonstrate that he has become a resident of that country for tax purposes, and a legal entity is a resident of Mexico if it was incorporated in Mexico or maintains the principal administration of its business or the effective location of its management in Mexico.  A Mexican citizen is presumed to be a resident of Mexico unless such person can demonstrate the contrary.  If a non-resident of Mexico is deemed to have a permanent establishment or fixed base in Mexico for tax purposes, all income attributable to such permanent establishment or fixed base will be subject to Mexican taxes, in accordance with applicable tax laws.

Tax Treaties

Provisions of the Tax Treaty that may affect the taxation of certain U.S. holders are summarized below.  The United States and Mexico have also entered into an agreement that covers the exchange of information with respect to tax matters.

Mexico has also entered into and is negotiating several other tax treaties that may reduce the amount of Mexican withholding tax to which payment of dividends on Series B Shares or ADSs may be subject.  Holders of Series B Shares or ADSs should consult their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences, if any, of such treaties.

Under the Mexican Income Tax Law, in order for any benefits from the Tax Treaty or any other tax treaties to be applicable, residence for tax purposes must be demonstrated.

Payment of Dividends

Since January 1, 2014, under the Mexican Income Tax Law, dividends, either in cash or in kind, paid with respect to Series B Shares represented by ADSs are  subject to Mexican withholding tax of 10%, regardless of whether or not they come from the net tax profit account (cuenta de utilidad fiscal neta, or CUFIN).  This tax will not be paid if the dividends are paid from the CUFIN generated until December 31, 2013, for which the company paying the dividend shall keep records of both CUFIN accounts, the one generated until December 31, 2013 and the one generated as from January 1, 2014, indicating to which CUFIN the dividends which are being paid belong to.

It is important to mention that the withholding tax may be lower, if the receiver of the dividend resides in a country which has entered into a Treaty to Avoid the Double Taxation with Mexico and if such Treaty provides for a lower tax. In the case of residents in the United States, the withholding tax is 0%.

A Mexican corporation will not be subject to any tax if the amount of declared dividends does not exceed the CUFIN, regardless of the date on which such CUFIN was generated.

If we pay a dividend in an amount greater than our CUFIN balance (which may occur in a year when net profits exceed the balance in such accounts), then we are required to pay 30% income tax on an amount equal to the product of the portion of the grossed-up amount which exceeds such balance multiplied by 1.4286  . This tax would be paid by the company paying the dividend.

Taxation of Dispositions

The sale or other disposition of ADSs by a non-resident holder will be subject to a Mexican withholding income tax of 10% over the profit.  Deposits of Series B Shares in exchange for ADSs and withdrawals of Series B Shares in exchange for ADSs will not give rise to Mexican tax or transfer duties.The sale of Series B Shares by a non-resident holder will be subject to a withholding of  10% Mexican tax on the profits, if the transaction is carried out through the Mexican Stock Exchange or other securities markets approved by the Mexican Ministry of Finance.

The tax referred to in the previous paragraph is not payable, if the seller of the shares resides in a country which has entered into a treaty to avoid the double taxation with Mexico. For these purposes, the seller shall deliver to the intermediary a writ in which, under oath, it states that it is a resident for purposes of the treaty and will provide its tax registry identification number.

77

Sales or other dispositions of Series B Shares made in other circumstances generally would be subject to higher rates of Mexican tax, regardless of the nationality or residence of the transferor.

Under the Mexican Income Tax Law, gains realized by a nonresident holder of shares on the sale or disposition of Series B Shares not conducted through a recognized stock exchange generally are subject to a Mexican tax at a rate of 25% of the gross sale price.  However, if the holder is a resident of a country which (i) is not considered to be a low tax rate country, (ii) its legislation does not contain territorial taxation, and (iii) such income is not subject to a preferential tax regime, the holder may elect to designate a resident of Mexico as its representative, in which case taxes would be payable at the applicable income tax rate on the gain on such disposition of Series B Shares.

Pursuant to the Tax Treaty, gains realized by qualifying U.S. holders from the sale or other disposition of Series B Shares, even if the sale is not conducted through a recognized stock exchange, will not be subject to Mexican income tax except that Mexican taxes may apply if:

·50% or more of our assets consist of fixed assets situated in Mexico;

·such U.S. holder owned 25% or more of the Series B Shares representing the capital stock of GRUMA (including ADSs), directly or indirectly, during the 12-month period preceding such disposition; or

·the gain is attributable to a permanent establishment or fixed base of the U.S. holder in Mexico.

Other Mexican Taxes

A non-resident holder will not be liable for estate, inheritance or similar taxes with respect to its holdings of Series B Shares or ADSs; provided, however, that gratuitous transfers of Series B Shares may in certain circumstances result in imposition of a Mexican tax upon the recipient.  There are no Mexican stamp, issue registration or similar taxes payable by a non-resident holder with respect to Series B Shares or ADSs.

Reimbursement of capital pursuant to a redemption of Series B Shares will be tax exempt up to an amount equivalent to the adjusted contributed capital corresponding to the Series B Shares that will be redeemed.  Any excess distribution pursuant to a redemption will be considered a dividend for tax purposes and we may be taxed as described above.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations

The following is a summary of certain U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. holders, as defined below, of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Series B Shares or ADSs.  This summary is based upon the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), Treasury regulations, administrative pronouncements of the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) and judicial decisions, all as in effect on the date of this Annual Report, including the provisions of the Tax Treaty, and all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect, and to different interpretations.  This summary does not describe any state, local, or non-U.S. tax law consequences, or any aspect of U.S. federal tax law other than U.S. federal income tax law (such as the estate tax and gift tax).

The summary does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership or disposition of Series B Shares or ADSs.  The summary applies only to U.S. holders that will hold their Series B Shares or ADSs as capital assets and does not apply to special classes of holders such as dealers in securities or currencies, holders with a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar, holders that own or are treated as owning 10% or more of our voting Series B Shares (whether held directly or through ADSs or both), tax-exempt entities, financial institutions, insurance companies, regulated investment companies, real estate investment trusts, certain U.S. expatriates, holders liable for the alternative minimum tax, securities traders electing to account for their investment in their Series B Shares or ADSs on a mark-to-market basis, partnerships and other pass-through entities and persons holding their Series B Shares or ADSs in a hedging transaction or as part of a straddle, conversion or other integrated transaction.  The following summary assumes that we are not a passive foreign investment company (a “PFIC”), which we do not believe that we were for our 2013 taxable year and do not currently expect to become for our current taxable year or the foreseeable future.

For purposes of this discussion, a “U.S. holder” is a beneficial owner of Series B Shares or ADSs that is:

·a citizen or resident of the United States;

78

·a corporation (or an entity taxable as a corporation) organized in or under the laws of the United States or any state thereof or the District of Columbia;

·an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal taxation regardless of its source;

·a trust if (i) a court within the U.S. is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (ii) such trust has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a U.S. person;

If a partnership (or any entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) is a beneficial owner of Series B Shares or the ADSs, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner in the partnership generally will depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership.  A holder of Series B Shares or ADSs that is a partnership, and partners in such partnership, should consult their tax advisors about the U.S. federal income tax consequences of acquiring, holding and disposing of the Series B Shares or the ADSs, as the case may be.

Prospective investors in the Series B Shares or ADSs should consult their own tax advisors as to the U.S. federal, Mexican or other tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of the Series B Shares or ADSs, including, in particular, the effect of any foreign, state or local tax laws and their entitlement to the benefits, if any, afforded by the Tax Treaty.

Treatment of ADSs

The following summary assumes that the representations contained in the Deposit Agreement are true and that the obligations in the Deposit Agreement and any related agreement will be complied with in accordance with their terms. In general, a U.S. holder of ADSs will be treated as the beneficial owner of the Series B Shares represented by those ADSs for U.S. federal income tax purposes.  Deposits or withdrawals of Series B Shares by U.S. holders in exchange for the ADSs will not result in the realization of gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes.  U.S. holders that withdraw any Series B Shares should consult their own tax advisors regarding the treatment of any foreign currency gain or loss on any pesos received in respect of such Series B Shares.

Taxation of Distributions

In this discussion, the term “dividends” is used to mean distributions paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (calculated for U.S. federal income tax purposes) with respect to Series B Shares or ADSs.  In general, subject to the discussion below under “Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules,” the gross amount of any dividends will be includible in the gross income of a U.S. holder as ordinary income on the day on which the dividends are received by the U.S. holder in the case of Series B Shares, or by the depositary in the case of ADSs.  Dividends paid by us will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction allowed to corporations under the Code.  To the extent that a distribution exceeds the amount of our earnings and profits (calculated for U.S. federal income tax purposes), it will be treated as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of the U.S. holder’s basis in the Series B Shares or ADSs, and thereafter as capital gain.  We do not intend to calculate our earnings and profits in accordance with U.S. federal income tax principles. Therefore, a U.S. holder should expect that a distribution on Series B Shares or ADSs generally will be treated as a dividend.  Distributions will be paid in pesos and will be includible in the income of a U.S. holder in a U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the day that they are received by the U.S. holder in the case of Series B Shares, or by the depositary in the case of ADSs.  U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the treatment of foreign currency gain or loss, if any, on any pesos received by a U.S. holder or depositary that are converted into U.S. dollars on a date subsequent to receipt.

Distributions of additional Series B Shares or ADSs to U.S. holders with respect to their Series B Shares or ADSs that are made as part of a pro rata distribution to all of our shareholders generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax.

Dividends paid on Series B Shares or ADSs generally will be treated for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes as foreign source passive category income.  In the event Mexican withholding taxes are imposed on such dividends, any such withheld taxes would be treated as part of the gross amount of the dividend includible in income of a U.S. holder for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and such taxes may be treated as a foreign income tax eligible, subject to generally applicable limitations and conditions under U.S. federal income tax law, for credit against a U.S. holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability or, at the U.S. holder’s election, for deduction from gross income in computing the U.S. holder’s taxable income. The calculation and availability of foreign tax credits and, in the case of a U.S. holder that elects to deduct foreign taxes, the availability of deductions, involves the application of complex rules that depend on a U.S. holder’s particular circumstances.  In the event Mexican withholding taxes are imposed, U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the availability of foreign tax credits.

79

U.S. holders should be aware that the IRS has expressed concern that parties to whom ADSs are transferred may be taking actions that are inconsistent with the claiming of foreign tax credits by U.S. holders of ADSs.  Accordingly, the discussion above regarding the creditability of Mexican withholding taxes could be affected by future actions that may be taken by the IRS.

Qualified Dividend Income

Certain dividends received by non-corporate U.S. holders that constitute “qualified dividend income” will be subject to a reduced maximum marginal U.S. federal income tax rate.  Qualified dividend income generally includes, dividends received from “qualified foreign corporations.” In general, the term “qualified foreign corporation” includes a foreign corporation that is eligible for the benefits of a comprehensive income tax treaty with the United States which the U.S. Treasury Department determines to be satisfactory, and which includes an exchange of information program.  The Tax Treaty has been approved for this purpose by the U.S. Treasury Department.  In addition, a foreign corporation is treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to any dividend paid by the corporation with respect to stock of the corporation that is readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States.  For this purpose, a share is treated as readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States if an ADR backed by such share is so traded.

Notwithstanding the previous rule, dividends received from a foreign corporation that is a passive foreign investment company or “PFIC,” as discussed below, under “Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules,” in the year in which the dividend was paid (or was a PFIC in the year prior to the year in which the dividend was paid) will not constitute qualified dividend income.  In addition, the term “qualified dividend income” will not include, among other dividends, any (i) dividends on any share of stock or ADS which is held by a taxpayer for 60 days or less during the 121-day period beginning on the date which is 60 days before the date on which such share or the Series B Shares backing the ADS become ex-dividend with respect to such dividends or (ii) dividends to the extent that the taxpayer is under an obligation (whether pursuant to a short sale or otherwise) to make related payments with respects to positions in substantially similar or related property.  Moreover, special rules apply in determining a taxpayer’s foreign tax credit limitation in the case of qualified dividend income.

Individual U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors to determine whether or not amounts received as dividends from us will constitute qualified dividend income subject to a reduced maximum marginal U.S. federal income tax rate and, in such case, the effect, if any, on the individual U.S. holder’s foreign tax credit.

Taxation of Dispositions

Subject to the discussion below under “Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules,” gain or loss realized by a U.S. holder on the sale, redemption or other taxable disposition of Series B Shares or ADSs will be subject to U.S. federal income taxation as capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between such U.S. holder’s adjusted basis in the Series B Shares or the ADSs and the amount realized on the disposition (including any amounts withheld in respect of Mexican withholding tax).  Any such gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if the Series B Shares or ADSs have been held for more than one year as of the time of the sale, redemption or other taxable disposition.  Under current law, certain non-corporate U.S. holders may be eligible for preferential rates of U.S. federal income tax in respect of long-term capital gains.  The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations under the Code.

If Mexican income tax is withheld on the sale, redemption or other taxable disposition of Series B Shares or ADSs, the amount realized by a U.S. holder will include the gross amount of the proceeds of that sale, redemption or other taxable disposition before deduction of the Mexican income tax.  A U.S. holder who is eligible for the benefits of the Tax Treaty, can elect to treat capital gain or loss, if any, realized on the sale or other taxable disposition of Series B Shares or ADSs that is subject to Mexican income tax as foreign source gain or loss for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. Consequently, in the case of gain from the disposition of Series B Shares or ADSs that is subject to Mexican income tax (see “Mexican Taxation — Taxation of Disposition”), a U.S. holder, subject to a number of complex limitations and conditions (including a minimum holding period requirement), may be able to benefit from the foreign tax credit for that Mexican income tax. Otherwise, any, capital gain or loss realized by a U.S. holder on a sale, redemption or other taxable disposition of Series B Shares or ADSs will be treated as U.S. source income or loss for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes  and a U.S. holder may not be able to benefit from the foreign tax credit for that Mexican income tax (i.e., because the gain from the disposition would be U.S. source), unless the U.S. holder can apply the credit against U.S. federal income tax payable on other income from foreign sources.  Alternatively, the U.S. holder may take a deduction for the Mexican income tax if it does not elect to claim a foreign tax credit with respect to any foreign income taxes paid or accrued during the taxable year.

U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of the foreign tax credit rules to their investment in, and disposition of, Series B Shares or ADSs.

80

Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules

Certain adverse U.S. federal income tax rules generally apply to a U.S. person that owns or disposes of stock in a non-U.S. corporation that is classified as a PFIC. In general, a non-U.S. corporation will be classified as a PFIC for any taxable year during which, after applying relevant look-through rules with respect to the income and assets of subsidiaries, either (i) 75.0% or more of the non-U.S. corporation’s gross income is “passive income” or (ii) 50.0% or more of the gross value (determined on a quarterly basis) of the non-U.S. corporation’s assets produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income. For these purposes, passive income generally includes, among other things, dividends, interest, rents, royalties, gains from the disposition of passive assets and gains from commodities and securities transactions (other than certain active business gains from the sale of commodities). In determining whether a non-U.S. corporation is a PFIC, a pro rata portion of the income and assets of each corporation in which it owns, directly or indirectly, at least 25.0% interest (by value) is taken into account.

The Company does not believe that it was a PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, for its preceding taxable year and does not expect to be a PFIC in its current taxable year or in the foreseeable future. However, because PFIC status depends upon the composition of a company’s income and assets, the market value of assets from time to time, and the application of rules that are not always clear, there can be no assurance that the Company will not be classified as a PFIC for any taxable year.

If the Company was to be classified a PFIC, a U.S. holder could be subject to material adverse tax consequences including being subject to greater amounts of tax on gains and certain distributions on the Series B Shares or ADSs as well as increased reporting obligations. U.S. holders should consult their tax advisors about the possibility that the Company might be classified as a PFIC and the consequences if the Company was classified as a PFIC.

Medicare Tax on Net Investment Income

A U.S. holder that is an individual, an estate or a trust (other than a trust that falls into a special class of trusts that is exempt from such tax) will be subject to a 3.8% tax on the lesser of (1) the U.S. holder’s “net investment income” (in the case of individuals) or “undistributed net investment income” (in the case of estates and trusts) for the relevant taxable year and (2) the excess of the U.S. holder’s “modified adjusted gross income” (in the case of individuals) or “adjusted gross income” (in the case of estates and trusts) for the taxable year over a certain threshold (which in the case of individuals will be between U.S.$125,000 and U.S.$250,000 depending upon the individual’s circumstances). A U.S. holder’s net investment income generally will include its dividend income on the Series B Shares or ADSs, and its net gains from the disposition of the Series B Shares or ADSs. U.S. holders that are individuals, estates or trusts should consult their own tax advisors regarding the applicability of the Medicare tax to their income and gains in respect of the Series B Shares or ADSs.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

Dividends on, and proceeds from the sale or other disposition of, the Series B Shares or ADSs paid to a U.S. holder generally may be subject to the information reporting requirements of the Code and may be subject to backup withholding at the applicable rate unless the holder:

·establishes that it is an exempt holder; or

·provides an accurate taxpayer identification number on a properly completed IRS Form W-9 and certifies that no loss of exemption from backup withholding has occurred.

The amount of any backup withholding from a payment to a holder will be allowed as a credit against the U.S. holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle such holder to a refund, provided that certain required information is timely furnished to the IRS.

Recently enacted legislation requires individual U.S. Holders to report information to the IRS with respect to their investment in Series B Shares or ADSs unless certain requirements are met.  Investors who are individuals and fail to report required information could become subject to substantial penalties.  Prospective investors are encouraged to consult with their own tax advisors regarding the possible implications of this new legislation on their investment in Series B Shares or ADSs.

DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY

We are subject to the information requirements of the Exchange Act and, in accordance therewith, we are required to file reports and other information with the SEC.  These materials, including this Form 20-F and the exhibits thereto, may be inspected and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.  The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.

81

ITEM 11       Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We are exposed to market risks arising from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices and commodity prices.  We use derivative instruments from time to time, on a selective basis, to manage these risks.  In addition, we have also historically used certain derivative instruments for trading purposes.  We adopted a risk management policy that precludes the use of derivative instruments for trading purposes.  We maintain and control our treasury operations and overall financial risk through practices approved by our senior management.

RISK MANAGEMENT AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

In 2008 we implemented specific improvements to our internal controls concerning the use of derivative financial instruments.  In addition, we implemented a new risk management policy that besides consolidating such improvements, prohibits the Company from entering into derivative financial instruments for trading purposes with the aim of obtaining profits based on changes in market values.  However, the use of financial derivative instruments for hedging purposes is allowed if used with the objective of mitigating financial risks and associated with a hedged item that is relevant to business activities.

INTEREST RATE RISK

We depend upon debt financing transactions, including debt securities, bank and vendor credit facilities and leases, to finance our operations.  All such financial instruments, as well as the related interest rate derivatives discussed further below, are entered into for other than trading purposes.  These transactions expose us to interest rate risk, with the primary interest-rate risk exposure resulting from changes in the relevant base rates (mostly LIBOR and to a lesser extent, Prime and TIIE) which are used to determine the interest rates that are applicable to borrowings under our credit facilities.  We are also exposed to interest rate risk in connection with refinancing of maturing debt.  We had U.S.$301.1 million (Ps.3,938 million) of fixed rate debt and U.S.$970.3 million (Ps.12,688 million) in floating rate debt as of December 31, 2013.  A hypothetical 100 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates would not have a significant effect on the fair value of our fixed rate debt.  The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2013, principal cash flows and the related weighted average interest rates by expected maturity dates for our debt obligations.

	Maturity Dates
	2014		2015		2016		2017		Thereafter		Total		Fair Value
	(in millions of pesos, except percentages)
Liabilities
Debt
Fixed Rate (Ps.)	3.8		11.0		—		—		3,923.0		3,937.8		3,981.9
Average Rate	3.99	%	3.99	%	—		—		7.75	%	7.73	%
Floating Rate (Ps.)	3,272.1		951.8		3,310.3		1,586.5		3,567.2		12,687.9		12,910.1
Average Rate	5.67	%	2.6	%	2.75	%	4.76	%	4.19	%	3.81	%

From time to time, we use derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps for purposes of hedging a portion of our debt, in order to reduce our exposure to increases in interest rates.  Several of these contracts, however, do not qualify for accounting treatment as hedging transactions.

Since 2011 we have not entered into any additional interest rate swap transactions.

In the case of our cash and short-term investments, declines in interest rates decrease the interest return on floating rate cash deposits and short-term investments.  A hypothetical 100 basis point decrease in interest rates would not have a significant effect on our results of operations.

In the case of our floating interest rate debt, a rise in interest rates increases the interest expense on floating rate debt.  A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates would not have a significant effect on our results of operations.

82

FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATE RISK

Our net sales are denominated in U.S. dollars, Mexican pesos and other currencies.  During 2013, 46% of our revenues were generated in U.S. dollars, 39% in pesos and 15% in other currencies.  In addition, as of December 31, 2013, 71% of our total assets were denominated in currencies other than Mexican pesos, particularly U.S. dollars.  A significant portion of our operations is financed through U.S. dollar-denominated debt.

We believe that we have natural foreign exchange hedges incorporated in our balance sheet, in significant part because we have subsidiaries outside Mexico, and the peso-denominated value of our equity in these subsidiaries is also exposed to fluctuations in exchange rates.  Changes in the peso value of equity in our subsidiaries caused by movements in foreign exchange rates are recognized as a component of equity.  See Note 6 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

As of December 31, 2013, 64.9% of our debt obligations was denominated in U.S. dollars.  The following table sets forth information concerning our U.S. dollar-denominated debt as of December 31, 2013.  The table does not reflect our U.S. dollar sales or our U.S. dollar-denominated assets.

	Expected Maturity Date (U.S. dollar-denominated Debt) as of December 31, 2013
U.S. dollar-denominated debt	2014	2015	2016	Thereafter	Total	Fair Value
	(in millions of pesos)
7.75% Perpetual Bond	0	0	0	3,923.0	3,923.0	3,967.1
BBVA Syndicated Loan Facility	326.9	326.9	1,307.7	0	1,961.5	2,009.6
Rabobank Syndicated Facility	143.8	287.7	431.5	2,013.8	2,876.8	2,988.9
Gruma Corp	0	0	1,046.1	0	1,046.1	1,038.8
Other U.S. dollar loans	989.7	0	0	0	989.7	989.7
TOTAL	1,460.4	614.6	2,785.3	5,936.8	10,797.1	10,994.1

An important part of our foreign exchange rate risk relates to our substantial U.S. dollar-denominated debt for our non-U.S. subsidiaries.

As indicated in Notes 6 A and 22 C to our audited consolidated financial statements, during 2013, we entered into forward transactions in order to hedge the Mexican peso to U.S. dollar foreign exchange rate risk related to the price of corn purchases for the summer and winter corn harvests in Mexico.  Since these exchange rate derivative financial instruments did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, they were recognized at fair value and are subsequently re-measured at fair value.  As of December 31, 2013, we had open positions of foreign exchange derivative transactions with maturity during January 2014 that represented a gain of Ps.12.3 million which was recognized in income as comprehensive financing cost, net. The operations terminated throughout 2013 of these instruments represented a favorable effect of approximately Ps.29.8 million recognized in income.

As of March 31, 2014, the Company had foreign exchange derivative transactions in effect for a nominal amount of U.S.$27 million with different maturities from April through May, 2014. We recognized our currency derivative instruments at fair value. The purpose of these contracts was to hedge the risks related to exchange rate fluctuations on the price of corn and wheat, which is denominated in U.S. dollars.

In recent years, political and social instability has prevailed in Venezuela, and the Venezuelan government devalued its currency and established a two tier exchange structure on January 11, 2010.  On December 30, 2010, the Venezuelan government issued Exchange Agreement No. 14, which established a single exchange rate of 4.30 bolivars per U.S. dollar effective January 1, 2011.  We lost control of the Venezuelan Companies on January 22, 2013.  On February 8, 2013, the National Executive, through the Central Bank of Venezuela and the Ministry of Popular Power for Planning and Finance, amended the Exchange Agreement to the effect that an exchange rate of 6.30 bolivars per U.S. dollar is applicable to all operations conducted in foreign currency effective as of February 9, 2013. The Venezuelan Companies have been deconsolidated from our operations as of January 22, 2013. As indicated in Note 6 to our audited consolidated financial statements, in March 2013, the Venezuelan government announced the creation of an alternative exchange mechanism called the Supplementary System of Foreign Exchange Administration (Sistema Complementario de Administración de Divisas, SICAD). The SICAD operates as an auction system that allows entities in specific sectors to buy foreign currency for imports. This is not a free auction (that is, the counterpart that offers the highest price does not necessarily have the right to receive the

83

foreign currency). Each auction may have different rules (for example, the minimum and maximum amount of foreign currency that may be offered to exchange). Limited amounts of dollars are available and entities do not commonly get the full amount for which they entered in auction. During December 2013, the Venezuelan government authorized the Central Bank of Venezuela to publish the average exchange rate resulting of SICAD auctions. During the weeks commencing on December 23 and December 30, 2013, the Central Bank of Venezuela published on its website the average exchange rate for auctions No.13 and No.14 (11.30 Venezuelan bolivars per U.S. dollar).

On January 24, 2014, Exchange Agreement No. 25 became effective, which establishes the concepts to which the SICAD exchange rate (11.30 Venezuelan bolivars per U.S. dollar) applies, for sale of foreign currency operations. In addition, the agreement also provides that the sale operation of foreign currency, whose clearance has been requested to the Central Bank of Venezuela before the Exchange Agreement No. 25 became effective, will be settled at the exchange rate effective on the date on which such operations were authorized. This Exchange Agreement No.25 will result in a net foreign exchange loss of Ps.142,079 to us in 2014, which will be presented as discontinued operations, this exchange loss is originated by certain accounts receivable maintained with the Venezuelan companies as of December 31, 2013 which are expected to be settled at this new exchange rate (11.30 Venezuelan bolivars per U. S. dollar). The only mechanism available to obtain foreign currency to remit dividends outside of Venezuela is the CADIVI. Obtainment of foreign currency (U.S. dollars) has not been authorized to pay dividends outside of Venezuela in the past five years. Accordingly, it is important to consider which exchange rate is more appropriate when required to remit cash flows outside of Venezuela.

COMMODITY AND DERIVATIVE PRICE RISK

The availability and price of corn and other agricultural commodities, as well as fuel, are subject to wide fluctuations due to factors outside our control, such as weather, plantings, government (domestic and foreign) farm programs and policies, changes in global demand/supply and global production of similar and competitive crops, as well as hydrocarbons. We hedge a portion of our production requirements through commodity futures and options contracts in order to reduce the risk created by price fluctuations and supply of corn, wheat, natural gas, diesel and soy oils which exist as part of ongoing business operations. The open positions for hedges of purchases do not exceed the maximum production requirements for a one-year period.

During 2013, we entered into short-term hedge transactions through commodity futures and options for a portion of our requirements. All derivative financial instruments are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet at their fair value as either assets or liabilities. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded each period in earnings or accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity, depending on whether the derivative qualifies for hedge accounting and is effective as part of a hedge transaction. Ineffectiveness results when the change in the fair value of the hedge instruments differs from the change in the fair value of the hedged item.

For hedge transactions that qualify and are effective, gains and losses are deferred until the underlying asset or liability is settled, and then are recognized as part of that transaction.

Gains and losses which represent hedge ineffectiveness and derivative transactions that do not qualify for hedge accounting are recognized in income.

As of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 financial instruments that qualify as hedge accounting represented an unfavorable effect of Ps.71.5 million in 2013 and a favorable effect of Ps.119.3 million and Ps.14.9 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively, which was recognized as comprehensive income in equity. From time to time we hedge commodity price risks utilizing futures and options strategies that do not qualify for hedge accounting. As a result of non-qualification, these derivative financial instruments are recognized at their estimated fair values and are marked to market with the associated effect recorded in current period earnings. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we recognized a favorable effect of Ps.17.1 million and an unfavorable effect of Ps.40.2 million from these contracts, respectively. Additionally, as of December 31, 2013, we realized Ps.30.2 million in net losses on commodity price risk hedges that did not qualify for hedge accounting, while at December 31, 2012 and 2011 we realized net gains of Ps.21.1 million and net losses for Ps.52.6 million, respectively .

Based on our commodity exposure hedged with derivative financial instruments at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 a hypothetical 10 percent decline in market prices applied to the fair value of the instruments would result in a charge to income of Ps.54.6 million, Ps.68.8 million and Ps.40.4 million, respectively (for non-qualifying contracts).

84

COUNTERPARTY RISK

We maintain centralized treasury operations in Mexico for our Mexican operations and in the United States for our U.S. operations. Liquid assets are invested primarily in government bonds, bank repos and short-term debt instruments with a minimum “A1/P1” rating for our U.S. operations and “A” for our Mexican operations. We face credit risk from the potential non-performance by the counterparties in respect of the financial instruments that we utilize. Substantially all of these financial instruments are unsecured. We do not anticipate non-performance by the counterparties, which are principally licensed commercial banks with long-term credit ratings. In addition, we minimize counterparty solvency risk by entering into derivative instruments only with major national and international financial institutions using standard International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (“ISDA”) forms and long form confirmation agreements. For our operations in Europe, Oceania, Asia and Central America, we only invest cash reserves with well-known local banks and local branches of international banks.  In addition, we also keep small investments abroad.

The above discussion of the effects on us of changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, commodity prices and equity prices is not necessarily indicative of our actual results in the future. Future gains and losses will be affected by actual changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market exposures, as well as changes in the actual derivative instruments employed during any period.

85

ITEM 12Description Of Securities Other Than Equity Securities.

American Depositary Shares

Our Series B Shares have been traded on the Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, S.A.B. de C.V., or Mexican Stock Exchange, since 1994. The ADSs, each representing four Series B Shares, commenced trading on the New York Stock Exchange in November 1998. As of April 25, 2014, our capital stock was represented by 432,749,079 issued Series B shares, all of them fully subscribed and paid. As of December 31, 2013, 45,310,752 Series B shares of our common stock were represented by 11,327,688 ADSs held by five record holders in the United States.

Fees and Expenses

The following table summarizes the fees and expenses payable by holders of ADSs to Citibank, N.A. (the “Depositary”) pursuant to the Deposit Agreement dated September 18, 1998:

Service	Rate	By Whom Paid
(1)Issuance of ADSs upon deposit of Series B Shares (excluding issuances contemplated by paragraphs 3(b) and (5) below)	Up to U.S.$5.00 per 100 ADSs (or fraction thereof) issued	Party for whom deposits are made or party receiving ADSs
(2)Delivery of Series B Shares, property and cash against surrender of ADSs	Up to U.S.$5.00 per 100 ADSs (or fraction thereof) surrendered	Party surrendering ADSs or making withdrawal
(3)Distribution of (a) cash dividend or (b) ADSs pursuant to stock dividends (or other free distribution of stock)	No fee, so long as prohibited by the exchange upon which ADSs are listed	N/A

Service	Rate	By Whom Paid
(4)Distribution of cash proceeds (i.e. upon sale of rights or the sale of any securities or property pursuant to Sections the Deposit Agreement)	Up to $2.00 per 100 ADSs held	Party to whom distribution is made
(5)Distribution of ADSs pursuant to exercise of rights	Up to $2.00 per 100 ADSs issued	Party to whom distribution is made

In addition to the foregoing, holders of our ADSs are responsible for the following charges pursuant to the Deposit Agreement: (i) taxes (including applicable interest and penalties) and other governmental charges; (ii) such registration fees as may from time to time be in effect for the registration of Series B Shares on the share register and applicable to transfers of Series B Shares to or from the name of Citibank, S.A. (the “Custodian”), the Depositary or any nominees upon the making of deposits and withdrawals, respectively; (iii) such cable, telex and facsimile transmission and delivery expenses as are expressly provided in the Deposit Agreement to be at the expense of the person depositing Series B Shares or holders of ADSs; (iv) the customary expenses and charges incurred by the Depositary in the conversion of foreign currency; and (v) such fees and expenses as are incurred by the Depositary in connection with compliance with exchange control regulatory requirements applicable to Series B Shares, ADSs and ADRs.

Pursuant to the Deposit Agreement, the Depositary may deduct the amount of any taxes or other governmental charges owed from any payments to holders. It may also sell deposited securities to pay any taxes owed. Holders may be required to indemnify the Depositary, the Company and the Custodian from any claims with respect to taxes.

PART II

ITEM 13Defaults, Dividend Arrearages And Delinquencies.

Not applicable.

86

ITEM 14Material Modifications To The Rights Of Security Holders And Use Of Proceeds.

Not applicable.

ITEM 15Controls and Procedures.

(a)Disclosure controls and procedures. We carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2013. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon our evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and that it is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b)Management’s annual report on internal controls over financial reporting. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer and other personnel, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued(v.1992) by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with IFRS as issued by IASB. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (v.1992), our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2013.

(c)Attestation Report of the registered public accounting firm. The report of PricewaterhouseCoopers, S.C., an independent registered public accounting firm, on our internal control over financial reporting is included herein at page F-2.

(d)Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 16Reserved

ITEM 16A.Audit Committee Financial Expert.

Our Board of Directors has determined that Everardo Elizondo Almaguer qualifies as an independent member of the board and as an “audit committee financial expert”, within the meaning of this Item 16A.

ITEM 16B.Code of Ethics.

We have adopted a code of ethics, as defined in Item 16B of Form 20-F under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Our code of ethics applies, among others, to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,Chief Administrative

87

Officer, persons performing similar functions, members of the board of directors, senior management and employees. Our code of ethics is available on our web site at www.gruma.com. If we amend any provisions of our code of ethics that apply to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer and persons performing similar functions, or if we grant any waiver of such provisions to such persons, we will disclose such amendment or waiver on our web site at the same address.

ITEM 16C.Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

The following table sets forth the fees billed to us and our subsidiaries by our independent registered public accountants, PricewaterhouseCoopers, during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:

	Year ended December 31,
	2013		2012
	(thousands of Mexican pesos)
Audit fees	Ps.	46,306	Ps.	45,494
Tax fees	10,198		6,159
Other fees	1,190		2,687
Total fees	Ps.	57,694	Ps.	54,340

Audit fees in the above table are the aggregate fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers and its affiliates in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements, the review of our interim financial statements and statutory and regulatory audits.

Tax fees in the above table are fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers and its affiliates for tax compliance services, tax planning services and tax advice services.

Other fees in the above table are fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers and its affiliates for non-audit services, mainly related to accounting advice on the implementation of new accounting standards as well as accounting advice on derivative financial instruments, as permitted by the applicable independence rules.

Audit Committee Approval Policies and Procedures.

We have adopted pre-approval policies and procedures under which all audit and non-audit services provided by our external auditors must be pre-approved by the audit committee. Any service proposals submitted by external auditors need to be discussed and approved by the audit committee during its meetings, which take place at least four times a year. Once the proposed service is approved, we or our subsidiaries formalize the engagement of services. The approval of any audit and non-audit services to be provided by our external auditors is specified in the minutes of our audit committee. In addition, the members of our board of directors are briefed on matters discussed in the meetings of the audit committee.

ITEM 16D.Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 16E.Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers.

Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities

Period	(a) Total Number of  Shares (or Units)  Purchased	(b) Average Price Paid  per Share (or Units)	(c) Total Number of  Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of  Publicly Announced  Plans or Programs	(d) Maximum Number  (or Approximate  Dollar Value) of  Shares (or Units) that  May Yet Be Purchased  Under the Plans or  Programs
January 1, 2013-January 31, 2013	0	Not applicable	0	Not applicable
February 1, 2013-February 28, 2013	0	Not applicable	0	Not applicable
March 1, 2013-March 31, 2013	0	Not applicable	0	Not applicable
April 1, 2013-April 30, 2013	0	Not applicable	0	Not applicable
May 1, 2013-May 31, 2013	0	Not applicable	0	Not applicable
June 1, 2013-June 30, 2013	0	Not applicable	0	Not applicable
July 1, 2013-July 31, 2013	0	Not applicable	0	Not applicable
August 1, 2013-August 31, 2013	0	Not applicable	0	Not applicable
September 1, 2013-September 30, 2013	0	Not applicable	0	Not applicable
October 1, 2013-October 31, 2013	0	Not applicable	0	Not applicable
November 1, 2013-November 30, 2013	0	Not applicable	0	Not applicable
December 1, 2013-December 31, 2013	0	Not applicable	0	Not applicable

88

In December 2012, we acquired the stake that Archer-Daniels-Midland owned in us and certain of our subsidiaries. We acquired 18.81% of our then outstanding shares directly and an additional 4.35% of our then outstanding shares indirectly via the acquisition of Valores Azteca. In 2013, we merged Valores Azteca into Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. and subsequently cancelled those shares.

89

ITEM 16F.Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant.

During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 and through the date of this Annual Report, the principal independent registered public accountant engaged to audit our financial statements, PricewaterhouseCoopers, S.C., has not resigned, indicated that it has declined to stand for re-election after the completion of its current audit or been dismissed.

ITEM 16G.Corporate Governance.

We are a Mexican corporation with shares listed on the Mexican Stock Exchange and on the NYSE. Our corporate governance practices are governed by our bylaws and the Mexican corporate governance practices, including those set forth in the Mexican Securities Law, the Circular Única de Emisoras (the “Mexican Circular Única”) issued by the Mexican Banking and Securities Commission and the Reglamento Interior de la Bolsa Mexicana de Valores (the “Mexican Stock Exchange Rules”), and to applicable US securities laws including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”) and the rules of the NYSE (the “NYSE Rules”) to the extent SOX and the NYSE Rules apply to foreign private issuers like us. Certain NYSE Rules relating to corporate governance are not applicable to us because of our status as a foreign private issuer. Specifically, we are permitted to follow home country practices in lieu of certain provisions of Section 303A of the NYSE Rules. In accordance with the requirement of Section 303A.11 of the NYSE Rules, the following is a summary of significant ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from those required to be followed by U.S. domestic companies under the NYSE’s listing standards.

Independence of our Board of Directors

Under the NYSE Rules, controlled companies like us (regardless of our status as a foreign private issuer) are not required to have a board of directors composed of a majority of independent directors. However, the Mexican Securities Law requires that, as a listed company in Mexico, at least 25% of the members of our Board of Directors be independent as determined under the Mexican Securities Law. We have an alternate director for each of our directors. The Mexican Securities Law further provides that alternates of independent directors be independent as well. The Mexican Securities Law sets forth detailed standards for establishing independence which differ from those set forth in the NYSE Rules.

Executive Sessions

Under the NYSE Rules, non-management directors must meet at executive sessions without management. We are not required, under Mexican law, to hold executive sessions in which non-management directors meet without the management or to hold meetings of only independent directors. Our Board of Directors must meet at least four times per year.

Audit Committee

Under the NYSE Rules, listed companies must have an audit committee with a minimum of three members who are independent directors. Under the Mexican Securities Law, listed companies are required to have an Audit Committee comprised solely of independent directors. The members of the Audit Committee are appointed by the Board of Directors, with the exception of its Chairman, who is appointed by the shareholders at the Shareholders’ Meeting. Currently, our Audit Committee is comprised of three members. Our Audit Committee operates pursuant to the provisions of the Mexican Securities Law and our Bylaws. A description of the specific functions of our Audit Committee can be found in Item 10. See “Item 10. Additional Information—Audit and Corporate Governance Committees” for further information about our Audit Committee.

Audit Committee Reports

Under the NYSE Rules, Audit Committees are required to prepare an Audit Committee Report as required by the SEC to be included in the listed company’s annual proxy statement. As a foreign private issuer, we are not required by the SEC to prepare and file proxy statements. In this regard, we are subject to Mexican securities law requirements. We have chosen to follow Mexican law and practice in this regard.

Corporate Governance Committee

Under both NYSE Rules and Mexican securities laws and regulations, listed companies are also required to have a Corporate Governance Committee comprised solely of independent directors. The Company’s Board of Directors appoints the members of the Corporate Governance Committee, with the exception of its Chairman, who is appointed by the shareholders at a Shareholders’ Meeting. Currently, our Corporate Governance Committee is comprised of the same three members of our Audit Committee. Our Corporate Governance Committee operates pursuant to the provisions of the Mexican Securities Law and our Bylaws. A description

90

of the specific functions of our Corporate Governance Committee can be found in Item 10. See “Item 10. Additional Information——Audit and Corporate Governance Committees” for further information about our Corporate Governance Committee.

Compensation Committee

Under NYSE Rules, listed companies must have a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors. Under our Bylaws and the Mexican securities laws and regulations, we are not required to have a compensation committee. Currently, we do not have such a committee.

Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Ethics

Domestic issuers listed on the NYSE are required to adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines and a code of business conduct and ethics for directors, officers and employees and promptly disclose any waivers of such code for directors or executive officers. We are not required to adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines under Mexican law to the same extent as the NYSE Rules. However, pursuant to regulations of the Bolsa Mexicana de Valores or Mexican Stock Exchange we are required to annually file with the Mexican Stock Exchange a statement relating to our level of adherence to the Mexican Code of Best Corporate Practices. Our statement can be found on our corporate web page. We are not required to adopt a Code of Ethics under Mexican law. However, in April 2003, we adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to our directors, officers and employees.  Our Code of Ethics can also be found on our corporate web page under “Corporate Governance.”

Solicitation of Proxies

Under NYSE Rules, listed companies are required to solicit proxies and provide proxy materials for all meetings of shareholders.  Such proxy solicitations are to be provided to the NYSE.  We are not required to solicit proxies from our shareholders.  Under our Bylaws and Mexican securities laws and regulations, we inform shareholders of all meetings by public notice, which states the requirements for admission to the meeting.  Under the deposit agreement relating to our ADSs, holders of our ADSs receive notice of shareholders’ meetings together with information explaining how to instruct the depositary bank to exercise the voting rights of the securities represented by ADSs.

ITEM 16H.Mine Safety Disclosure.

Not Applicable.

PART III

ITEM 17Financial Statements.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 18Financial Statements.

See pages F-1 through F-85, incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 19Exhibits.

Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC, we have filed certain agreements as exhibits to this annual report on Form 20-F. These agreements may contain representations and warranties by the parties. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the other party or parties to such agreements and (i) may be intended not as statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties to such agreements if those statements turn out to be inaccurate, (ii) may have been qualified by disclosures that were made to such other party or parties and that either have been reflected in the Company’s filings or are not required to be disclosed in those filings, (iii) may apply materiality standards different from what may be viewed as material to investors, and (iv) were made only as of the date of such agreements or such other date(s) as may be specified in such agreements and are subject to more recent developments. Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe our actual state of affairs at the date hereof.

91

Documents filed as exhibits to this annual report:

Exhibit No.
1	English translation of our bylaws (estatutos sociales) as amended through May 15, 2013.
2(a)	Deposit Agreement, dated as of September 18, 1998, by and among us, Citibank, N.A. as Depositary and the Holders and Beneficial Owners of American Depositary Shares Evidenced by American Depositary Receipts Issued Thereunder (including form of American Depositary Receipt).(1)
2(b)	Indenture, dated as of December 3, 2004, between us and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Indenture Trustee representing up to U.S.$300,000,000 of our 7.75% Perpetual Bonds.(2)
4(a)(1)	U.S.$225 million credit facility by and among us, the Lenders party thereto and BBVA Bancomer, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero BBVA Bancomer, as Administrative Agent, dated March 22, 2011(3), and its amendment dated December 3, 2012.(4)
4(a)(2)	U.S.$200 million revolving credit facility among Gruma Corporation, the Lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Documentation Agent, Swing Line Lender, and Letter of Credit Issuer, dated June 20, 2011, and its amendment dated November 21, 2012.(4)
4(a)(3)	Ps.600 million term loan by and among us and Banco Nacional de Comercio Exterior, S.N.C. dated June 16, 2011(4), and its amendment dated December 7, 2012.(5)
4(a)(4)	Ps.1,200 million credit facility by and among us, the Lenders party thereto and BBVA Bancomer, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero BBVA Bancomer, as Administrative Agent, dated June 15, 2011(4), and its amendment dated December 3, 2012.(5)
4(a)(5)(1)	U.S.$50 million credit facility by and among us and Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. dated June 15, 2011(4), and its first amendment dated June 28, 2012.(5)
4(a)(5)(2)	U.S.$50 million credit facility by and among us and Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. dated June 15, 2011(4), and its second amendment dated November 29, 2012.(5)
4(a)(6)	U.S.$220 million syndicated credit facility dated June 13, 2013 with Rabobank Nederland
4(a)(7)	English translation of Ps 2,300 million syndicated credit facility dated June 10, 2013 with Inbursa
4(a)(8)	Equity Purchase Agreement by and among us, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, ADM Milling, Co., and ADM Bio Productos, S.A. de C.V. dated December 14, 2012.(5)
5	English translation of Trademark License Agreement by and among us and GIMSA, dated November 29, 2013.
8	List of Principal Subsidiaries.
12(a)(1)	CEO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated April 30, 2014.
12(a)(2)	CFO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated April 30, 2014.
13	Officer Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated April 30, 2014.

(1)Previously filed in Registration Statement on Form F-6 (File No. 333-9282), originally filed with the SEC on August 13, 1998.  Incorporated herein by reference.

92

(2)Previously filed in Annual Report on Form 20-F (File No. 1-14852), originally filed with the SEC on July 1, 2002. Incorporated herein by reference.

(3)Previously filed in Annual Report on Form 20-F (File No. 1-14852), originally filed with the SEC on June 8, 2011. Incorporated herein by reference.

(4)Previously filed in Annual Report on Form 20-F (File No. 1-14852), originally filed with the SEC on April 30, 2012. Incorporated herein by reference.

(5)Previously filed in Annual Report in Form 20-F (File No. 1-14852), originally filed with the SEC on April 30, 2013, Incorporated herein by reference.

SIGNATURES

The registrant, Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V., hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

GRUMA, S.A.B. de C.V.
	/s/ Homero Huerta Moreno
	Name:  Homero Huerta Moreno
	Title:  Chief Administrative Officer

Dated: April 30, 2014

93

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

CONTENT

	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-2
Consolidated financial statements:
Balance sheets	F-3
Income statements	F-4
Statements of comprehensive income	F-5
Statements of changes in equity	F-6
Statements of cash flows	F-8
Notes to the consolidated financial statements	F-9 - F-85

F-1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders of

Gruma, S. A. B. de C. V.

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of income, of comprehensive income, of changes in equity and of cash flows, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Gruma, S. A. B. de C. V. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”), as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013 in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.  Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).  The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing in Item 15.  Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits.  We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.  Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk.  Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

As disclosed in Notes 28 and 30 to the consolidated financial statements, on January 22, 2013, the Ministry of Justice and Internal Relations in Venezuela designated individuals as special managers representing the Republic of Venezuela, for the foreign subsidiaries located in that country, providing the right to take control over such subsidiaries. Consequently and as a result of the loss of control, the Company stopped consolidating the financial information of the Venezuelan subsidiaries as of January 22, 2013.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

PricewaterhouseCoopers, S. C.

s/s Víctor A. Robledo Gómez

C.P.C. Víctor A. Robledo Gómez

Monterrey, Nuevo León, México

April 29, 2014

F-2

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos)

(Notes 1, 2 and 5)

	Note	As ofDecember 31, 2013			As ofDecember 31, 2012
Assets
Current:
Cash and cash equivalents	8	Ps.	1,338,555		Ps.	1,287,368
Derivative financial instruments	22	120,562			45,316
Accounts receivable, net	9	7,193,317			7,048,525
Inventories	10	7,644,130			13,383,990
Recoverable income tax		1,768,539			1,621,044
Prepaid expenses		167,739			228,791
		18,232,842			23,615,034
Asset held for sale	13	103,300			—
Total current assets		18,336,142			23,615,034
Non-current:
Long-term notes and accounts receivable	11	190,863			346,944
Investment in associates	12	148,881			1,156,251
Property, plant and equipment, net	13	17,904,972			20,917,534
Intangible assets, net	14	2,631,101			2,775,444
Deferred tax assets	15	287,668			649,195
Investment in Venezuela available for sale	28	3,109,013			—
Total non-current assets		24,272,498			25,845,368
Total Assets		Ps.	42,608,640		Ps.	49,460,402
Liabilities
Current:
Short-term debt	16	Ps.	3,275,897		Ps.	8,018,763
Trade accounts payable		3,547,498			6,307,796
Derivative financial instruments	22	71,540			28,832
Provisions	17	53,980			97,743
Income tax payable		1,525,933			327,657
Other current liabilities	18	2,875,593			2,744,267
Total current liabilities		11,350,441			17,525,058
Non-current:
Long-term debt	16	13,096,443			11,852,708
Provision for deferred taxes	15	2,046,118			4,225,367
Employee benefits obligations	19	629,043			583,764
Provisions	17	323,804			289,800
Other non-current liabilities	3	735,931			649,988
Total non-current liabilities		16,831,339			17,601,627
Total Liabilities		28,181,780			35,126,685
Equity
Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock	20	5,363,595			5,668,079
Reserves		(132,209		)	272,262
Retained earnings	20	7,741,678			5,361,325
Total shareholders’ equity		12,973,064			11,301,666
Non-controlling interest		1,453,796			3,032,051
Total Equity		14,426,860			14,333,717
Total Liabilities and Equity		Ps.	42,608,640		Ps.	49,460,402

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except per-share data)

(Notes 1, 2 and 5)

	Note	2013			2012			2011
Net sales		Ps.	54,106,305		Ps.	54,409,450		Ps.	48,488,146
Cost of sales		(36,510,754		)	(37,849,274		)	(33,371,189		)
Gross profit		17,595,551			16,560,176			15,116,957
Selling and administrative expenses		(12,572,458		)	(13,645,196		)	(12,485,762		)
Other expenses, net	24	(192,495		)	(100,970		)	(203,850		)
Operating income		4,830,598			2,814,010			2,427,345
Comprehensive financing cost, net	26	(968,414		)	(826,694		)	(627,313		)
Share of profits of associated companies	12	2,562			2,976			3,329
Gain from the sale of shares of associated company	12	—			—			4,707,804
Income before income tax		3,864,746			1,990,292			6,511,165
Income tax expense	27	(198,448		)	(862,781		)	(1,618,271		)
Consolidated net income from continuing operations		3,666,298			1,127,511			4,892,894
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net	28	(356,329		)	576,248			922,928
Consolidated net income		Ps.	3,309,969		Ps.	1,703,759		Ps.	5,815,822
Attributable to:
Shareholders		Ps.	3,163,133		Ps.	1,115,338		Ps.	5,270,762
Non-controlling interest		146,836			588,421			545,060
		Ps.	3,309,969		Ps.	1,703,759		Ps.	5,815,822
From continuing operations:
Basic and diluted earnings per share (pesos)		Ps.	7.75		Ps.	1.21		Ps.	8.16
From discontinued operations:
Basic and diluted earnings per share (pesos)		Ps.	(0.59	)	Ps.	0.79		Ps.	1.19
From continuing and discontinued operations:
Basic and diluted earnings per share (pesos)		Ps.	7.16		Ps.	2.00		Ps.	9.35
Weighted average shares outstanding (thousands)		441,835			558,712			563,651

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos)

(Notes 1, 2 and 5)

	Note	2013			2012			2011
Consolidated net income		Ps.	3,309,969		Ps.	1,703,759		Ps.	5,815,822
Other comprehensive income:
Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss:
Remeasurement of employment benefit obligations	19	(170,618		)	(105,967		)	2,336
Income taxes	15	42,298			10,783			11,725
		(128,320		)	(95,184		)	14,061
Items that may be subsequently reclassified to profit or loss:
Foreign currency translation adjustments (net of the reclassification adjustment from discontinued operations of Ps.432,458 in 2013)		156,847			29,130			1,589,088
Share of other comprehensive income of associated companies		—			71,217			(5,014		)
Cash flow hedges		(585,811		)	461,687			4,969
Other		—			(71,810		)	—
Income taxes	15	142,545			(125,113		)	9,261
		(286,419		)	365,111			1,598,304
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		(414,739		)	269,927			1,612,365
Total comprehensive income		Ps.	2,895,230		Ps.	1,973,686		Ps.	7,428,187
Attributable to:
Shareholders		Ps.	2,630,867		Ps.	1,378,161		Ps.	6,486,642
Non-controlling interest		264,363			595,525			941,545
		Ps.	2,895,230		Ps.	1,973,686		Ps.	7,428,187

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos)

(Notes 1, 2 and 5)

	Common stock(Note 20-A)					Reserves
	Numberof shares (thousands)		Amount			Foreign currency translation adjustment(Note 20-D)			Share of equity of associated companies			Cash flow hedges and other reserves			Retained earnings (Note 20-B)			Totalshare-holders’ equity			Non- controlling interest			Total equity
Balances at January 1, 2011	563,651		Ps.	6,972,425		Ps.	(1,282,185	)	Ps.	(66,203	)	Ps.	(1,694	)	Ps.	1,322,218		Ps.	6,944,561		Ps.	3,777,713		Ps.	10,722,274
Transactions with owners of the Company:
Dividends paid from net tax profit account (CUFIN)																		—			(524,303		)	(524,303		)
Contribution from non-controlling interest																		—			86,626			86,626
																		—			(437,677		)	(437,677		)
Comprehensive income:
Net income of the year															5,270,762			5,270,762			545,060			5,815,822
Foreign currency translation adjustment (Net of taxes of Ps.8,583)						1,205,213												1,205,213			392,458			1,597,671
Remeasurement of employment benefit obligations (Net of taxes of Ps.11,725)															10,034			10,034			4,027			14,061
Share of other comprehensive income of associated companies									(5,014		)							(5,014		)	—			(5,014		)
Cash flow hedges												4,969						4,969			—			4,969
Other												678						678			—			678
Comprehensive income of the year	—		—			1,205,213			(5,014		)	5,647			5,280,796			6,486,642			941,545			7,428,187
Balances at December 31, 2011	563,651		6,972,425			(76,972		)	(71,217		)	3,953			6,603,014			13,431,203			4,281,581			17,712,784
Transactions with owners of the Company:
Dividends paid from CUFIN																		—			(96,187		)	(96,187		)
Contribution from non-controlling interest																		—			165,710			165,710
Acquisition of Company’s own shares	(106,335	)	(1,304,346		)										(2,707,003		)	(4,011,349		)	—			(4,011,349		)
Contingent payment due to acquisition of Company’s own shares (Note 3)															(492,272		)	(492,272		)	—			(492,272		)
Effect of acquisition of non-controlling interest, net of taxes (Note 3)															995,923			995,923			(1,914,578		)	(918,655		)
	(106,335	)	(1,304,346		)	—			—			—			(2,203,352		)	(3,507,698		)	(1,845,055		)	(5,352,753		)
Comprehensive income:
Net income of the year															1,115,338			1,115,338			588,421			1,703,759
Foreign currency translation adjustment (Net of taxes of Ps.(825))						9,860												9,860			20,095			29,955
Other									71,217			(328		)	(71,217		)	(328		)	(265		)	(593		)
Remeasurement of employment benefit obligations (Net of taxes of Ps.10,783)															(82,458		)	(82,458		)	(12,726		)	(95,184		)
Cash flow hedges (Net of taxes of Ps.(125,938))												335,749						335,749			—			335,749
Comprehensive income of the year	—		—			9,860			71,217			335,421			961,663			1,378,161			595,525			1,973,686
Balances at December 31, 2012	457,316		Ps.	5,668,079		Ps.	(67,112	)	Ps.	—		Ps.	339,374		Ps.	5,361,325		Ps.	11,301,666		Ps.	3,032,051		Ps.	14,333,717

F-6

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos)

(Notes 1, 2 and 5)

	Common stock(Note 20-A)					Reserves
	Numberof shares (thousands)		Amount			Foreign currency translation adjustment(Note 20-D)			Share of equity of associated companies		Cash flow hedges and other reserves			Retained earnings (Note 20-B)			Totalshare-holders’ equity			Non- controlling interest			Total equity
Balances at December 31, 2012	457,316		Ps.	5,668,079		Ps.	(67,112	)	Ps.	—	Ps.	339,374		Ps.	5,361,325		Ps.	11,301,666		Ps.	3,032,051		Ps.	14,333,717
Transactions with owners of the Company:
Dividends paid from CUFIN																	—			(594,024		)	(594,024		)
Cancellation of Company’s own shares due to merger with shareholder (Note 12)	(24,567	)	(304,484		)									(705,364		)	(1,009,848		)	—			(1,009,848		)
Decrease of non-controlling interest due to cease of consolidation of Venezuela (Note 28)																	—			(1,057,497		)	(1,057,497		)
Effect on acquisition of non-controlling interest, net of taxes														50,379			50,379			(191,097		)	(140,718		)
	(24,567	)	(304,484		)	—			—		—			(654,985		)	(959,469		)	(1,842,618		)	(2,802,087		)
Comprehensive income:
Net income of the year														3,163,133			3,163,133			146,836			3,309,969
Foreign currency translation adjustment (Net of taxes of Ps.(14,391))						(278,338		)									(278,338		)	2,727			(275,611		)
Currency translation of discontinued operations						317,133											317,133			115,325			432,458
Remeasurement of employment benefit obligations (Net of taxes of Ps.42,298)														(127,795		)	(127,795		)	(525		)	(128,320		)
Cash flow hedges (Net of taxes of Ps.159,936)											(443,266		)				(443,266		)	—			(443,266		)
Comprehensive income of the year	—		—			38,795			—		(443,266		)	3,035,338			2,630,867			264,363			2,895,230
Balances at December 31, 2013	432,749		Ps.	5,363,595		Ps.	(28,317	)	Ps.	—	Ps.	(103,892	)	Ps.	7,741,678		Ps.	12,973,064		Ps.	1,453,796		Ps.	14,426,860

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-7

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011

(In thousands of Mexican pesos)

(Notes 1, 2 and 5)

	2013			2012			2011
Operating activities:
Income before taxes	Ps.	3,864,746		Ps.	1,990,292		Ps.	6,511,165
Foreign exchange (gain) loss from working capital	(17,002		)	91,990			(22,454		)
Net cost of the year for employee benefit obligations	110,397			107,270			35,347
Items related with investing activities:
Depreciation and amortization	1,636,448			1,590,392			1,461,308
Impairment of long-lived assets	45,235			4,014			93,808
Written-down fixed assets	—			37,681			52,271
Interest income	(16,645		)	(15,057		)	(33,259		)
Share of profits of associated companies	(2,562		)	(2,976		)	(3,329		)
Gain from the sale of shares of associated company	—			—			(4,707,804		)
Loss in sale of fixed assets and damaged assets	92,205			17,813			20,812
Items related with financing activities:
Derivative financial instruments	(40,725		)	(146,142		)	(207,816		)
Foreign exchange gain from debt	(38,761		)	(2,342		)	(23,953		)
Interest expense	1,015,458			782,487			903,005
	6,648,794			4,455,422			4,079,101
Accounts receivable, net	328,672			(321,637		)	(1,502,494		)
Inventories	2,202,680			(1,803,233		)	(1,828,095		)
Prepaid expenses	18,645			(10,384		)	118,980
Trade accounts payable	(1,539,124		)	705,178			1,276,091
Accrued liabilities and other accounts payables	528,842			(43,365		)	(85,622		)
Income taxes paid	(1,012,213		)	(1,793,400		)	(545,212		)
Employee benefits obligations and others, net	(139,549		)	(61,568		)	49,787
Net cash flows from operating activities of discontinued operations	(357,316		)	679,123			188,778
	30,637			(2,649,286		)	(2,327,787		)
Net cash flows from operating activities	6,679,431			1,806,136			1,751,314
Investing activities:
Acquisitions of property, plant and equipment	(1,468,326		)	(2,593,108		)	(1,588,513		)
Sale of property, plant and equipment	121,859			74,287			107,196
Investment in Valores Azteca, S.A. de C.V. (associate)	—			(895,640		)	—
Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired	—			—			(708,664		)
Acquisition of intangible assets	(3,401		)	(14,916		)	(20,743		)
Sale of shares of associated company	—			—			9,003,700
Interests collected	16,498			15,057			32,816
Other	12,276			15,339			(6,300		)
Net cash flows used in investing activities of discontinued operations	(203,807		)	(56,648		)	(40,363		)
Net cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities	(1,524,901		)	(3,455,629		)	6,779,129
Cash to be used in (provided by) financing activities	5,154,530			(1,649,493		)	8,530,443
Financing activities:
Proceeds from debt	12,361,530			14,618,388			15,162,806
Payment of debt	(15,877,418		)	(6,973,659		)	(21,373,729		)
Interests paid	(994,840		)	(768,289		)	(929,662		)
Derivative financial instruments collected	29,774			196,531			154,556
Acquisition of Company’s own shares	—			(4,011,348		)	—
Acquisition of non-controlling interest (1)	(37,418		)	(996,575		)	—
Capital contribution from non-controlling interest	—			165,710			86,626
Dividends paid	(594,024		)	(96,187		)	(524,303		)
Net cash flows used in financing activities of discontinued operations	—			(316,896		)	(5,353		)
Net cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities	(5,112,396		)	1,817,675			(7,429,059		)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	42,134			168,182			1,101,384
Exchange differences and effects from inflation on cash and cash equivalents	9,053			(60,465		)	56,950
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year	1,287,368			1,179,651			21,317
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year	Ps.	1,338,555		Ps.	1,287,368		Ps.	1,179,651

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

(1) At December 31, 2013, an account payable for Ps.103,300 resulted from this transaction.

F-8

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

1.ENTITY AND OPERATIONS

Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. (GRUMA) is a Mexican company with subsidiaries located in Mexico, the United States of America, Central America, Venezuela, Europe, Asia and Oceania, together referred to as the “Company”. The Company’s main activities are the production and sale of corn flour, wheat flour, tortillas and related products.

GRUMA is a publicly held corporation (Sociedad Anónima Bursátil de Capital Variable) organized under the laws of Mexico. The address of its registered office is Rio de la Plata 407 in San Pedro Garza García, Nuevo León, Mexico. GRUMA is listed on the Mexican Stock Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange.

The consolidated financial statements were authorized by the Chief Corporate Office and the Chief Administrative Office of the Company on April 23, 2014.

2.BASIS OF PREPARATION

The consolidated financial statements of Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. and Subsidiaries for all the periods presented have been prepared in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). The IFRS also include the International Accounting Standards (IAS) in force, as well as all the related interpretations issued by the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC), including those previously issued by the Standing Interpretations Committee (SIC).

The Company applied IFRS that were effective at December 31, 2013. The following standards have been adopted by the Company for the first time for the year beginning on January 1, 2013 and had the following impact:

IAS 19, “Employee Benefits” was revised in June 2011. The changes on the Company’s accounting policies have been as follows: to immediately recognize all past service costs; and to replace interest cost and expected return on plan assets with a net interest amount that is calculated by applying the discount rate to the net defined benefit liability (asset). These changes had no significant impact in the Company’s financial statements.

IFRS 12, “Disclosures of Interests in Other Entities” includes the disclosure requirements for all forms of interests in other entities, including joint arrangements, associates, structured entities, and other off balance sheet vehicles. The disclosures that were applicable to the Company were included in Note 21.

IFRS 13, “Fair Value Measurements” aims to improve consistency and reduce complexity by providing a precise definition of fair value and a single source of fair value measurement and disclosure requirements. The new disclosures that were applicable to the Company were included in Note 22.

IFRS 10, “Consolidated Financial Statements” - was issued in May 2011 and superseded the control and consolidation guidance contained in IAS 27, “Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements” and SIC 12 “Consolidation — Special Purpose Entities”. Under IFRS 10, the subsidiaries are all entities (including structured entities) over which the Company had control. The Company controls an entity when it is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns and has the capability to affect those returns through its power over the investee. The financial statements of subsidiaries are incorporated in the consolidated financial statements commencing on the date on which the control

F-9

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

begins, until the date when that control ceases. The Company has applied IFRS 10 retrospectively according to provisions described therein. The above mentioned had no effect on the consolidation of investments held by the Company.

In May 2013, the IASB amended the requirements related to recoverable amount of non-financial assets contained in IAS 36, “Impairment of Assets”. These amendments reduce the circumstances contained in IAS 36 in which the recoverable amount of cash-generating units (CGU) is required to be disclosed, due to the issuance of IFRS 13. These amendments must be applied for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014; however, the Company decided to early adopt these amendments starting January 1, 2013.

The 2011 annual amendments issued in May 2012 include amendments to IAS 16 “Property, Plant and Equipment” which clarify that spare parts and maintenance equipment that comply with the definition of property, plant and equipment, are not part of inventory; and amendments to IAS 32, “Financial Instruments: Presentation” clarify that income taxes resulting from distributions to shareholders are recorded in accordance with IAS 12 “Income Taxes”. These improvements had no significant impact in the Company’s financial statements.

A)  BASIS OF MEASUREMENT

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis of historical cost, except for Venezuela’s financial information for years 2012 and 2011, due to its hyperinflationary environment and for the fair value of certain financial instruments as described in the policies shown below (see Note 5-K).

The preparation of financial statements requires that management make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

B)  FUNCTIONAL AND PRESENTATION CURRENCY

The consolidated financial statements are presented in Mexican pesos, which is the functional currency of GRUMA.

C)  USE OF ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS

The relevant estimates and assumptions are reviewed on a regular basis. The review of accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimate was reviewed and in any future period that is affected.

In particular, the information for assumptions, uncertainties from estimates, and critical judgments in the application of accounting policies, that have the most significant effect in the recognized amounts in these consolidated financial statements, are described below:

·The assumptions used for the determination of fair values of financial instruments (Note 22).

·The assumptions and uncertainties with respect to the interpretation of complex tax regulations, changes in tax laws, and the amount and timing of future taxable income (Notes 15 and 27).

·The key assumptions in impairment testing for long-lived assets used for the determination of the recoverable amount for the different cash generating units (Notes 13 and 14).

F-10

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

·The actuarial assumptions used for the determination of employee benefits obligations (Note 19).

·The key assumptions in impairment testing of the investment in Venezuela (Notes 28 and 30).

3.ACQUISITION OF NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST OF ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND IN GRUMA AND CERTAIN SUBSIDIARIES

In 1996, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (“ADM”) associated with GRUMA (the “Association”) and as result of the Association, several bylaws were agreed and arrangements held, including the Shareholders Agreement entered into by and between GRUMA, Mr. Roberto González Barrera, ADM and its subsidiary ADM Bioproductos, S.A. de C.V. (“ADM Bioproductos”, and jointly with ADM, the “Strategic Partner”) dated August 21, 1996 and its subsequent amendments (the “Shareholders Agreement”).

As a result of the Association, as of October 23, 2012, the investment that the Strategic Partner owned, directly and indirectly, in GRUMA and certain of its subsidiaries (the “Equity Interests”), was as follows:

·23.16% of the capital stock of GRUMA. The strategic Partner held directly 18.81% of the capital stock of GRUMA and indirectly 4.35% through owning 45% of Valores Azteca, S.A. de C.V. (“Valores Azteca”), a company that held 9.66% of the capital stock of GRUMA.

·3% of the capital stock of Valores Mundiales, S.L. (“Valores Mundiales”).

·3% of the capital stock of Consorcio Andino, S.L. (“Consorcio”).

·40% of the capital stock of Molinera de México, S.A. de C.V. (“Molinera”).

·20% of the capital stock of Azteca Milling L.P. (“Azteca Milling”).

Based on the terms of the Association, if the Strategic Partner decided to sell to a third party its direct investment on GRUMA’s shares and indirectly through Valores Azteca (the “GRUMA Shares”), the Strategic Partner had to offer first such investment to the Control Trust of the González Family (the “Controlling Shareholder”) or any third party as designated by the Controlling Shareholder, granting the option to acquire the shares of GRUMA.

Also, if the Strategic Partner decided to sell to a third party its investment on the capital stock of Valores Mundiales, Consorcio, Molinera and/or Azteca Milling (the “Subsidiaries Shares”), the strategic Partner had to offer GRUMA the right of first refusal to acquire the Subsidiaries Shares.

On October 16, 2012, ADM reached a preliminary agreement with a Third Party to sell its minority interest on GRUMA’s shares (the “Preliminary Agreement”), to the following price:

Company	Selling price
GRUMA	U.S.$303.8 million, plus up to U.S.$48.7 million as contingent price
Valores Azteca	U.S.$70.2 million, plus up to U.S.$11.3 million as contingent price
Azteca Milling	U.S.$50 million
Molinera	U.S.$18 million
Consorcio	U.S.$1.5 million
Valores Mundiales	U.S.$6.5 million
Total	U.S.$450 million, plus up to U.S.$60 million as contingent price

F-11

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

On October 23, 2012, the third Party sent a communication to GRUMA’s Board of Directors, requiring the approval to purchase the 23.16% of the capital stock of GRUMA owned, directly and indirectly, by the Strategic Partner, and additionally, expressed its interest to purchase the Strategic Partner’s investment on Valores Mundiales, Consorcio, Molinera and Azteca Milling, as mentioned in the Preliminary Agreement.

As informed to GRUMA, on October 19, 2012, the Strategic Partner notified the Controlling Shareholder of its intention to sell its GRUMA Shares to a third Party pursuant to the terms agreed in the Preliminary Agreement, giving the Controlling Shareholder the option to acquire such shares, or to designate a third party to do so, at the same price as agreed in the Preliminary Agreement.

The Controlling Shareholder designated GRUMA as the third party to exercise the right to acquire the GRUMA Shares that the Strategic Partner offered for sale (including the acquisition of the Strategic Partner’s investment on Valores Azteca).

Additionally, through various communications dated October 25, 2012, the Strategic Partner notified GRUMA’s subsidiaries its intention to sell the Subsidiaries Shares pursuant to the terms agreed in the Preliminary Agreement, giving GRUMA the first refusal right to acquire the Subsidiaries Shares at the same price as agreed in the Preliminary Agreement.

On December 5, 2012, GRUMA’s Board of Directors, with the previous favorable opinion of the Corporate Governance and the Audit Committee, supported on a fairness opinion made by an independent expert, approved GRUMA’s exercise of the option and/or right of first refusal of the Controlling Shareholder to acquire from the Strategic Partner the GRUMA Shares, (including the shares that Valores Azteca held), the Subsidiaries Shares, and to obtain the necessary financing instrument to pay for this transaction.

On December 13, 2012, an Ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting of GRUMA was held, approving, among other things, the increase of the maximum amount of resources allocated to the purchase of own shares during fiscal year 2012. Also and on the same date, an Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting of GRUMA was held, approving, among other things, an amendment to GRUMA’s bylaws in order to recognize, on a statutory basis, the existence of the Shareholders Agreement.

On December 14, 2012, GRUMA acquired from the Strategic Partner its investment owned directly and indirectly in GRUMA and certain of its subsidiaries, consisting of:

a.23.16% of the issued shares of GRUMA, through the acquisition of 18.81% of the issued shares of GRUMA and 45% of the issued shares of Valores Azteca, a company that owns 9.66% of the issued shares of GRUMA. With respect to the acquisition of 18.81% of the issued shares of GRUMA, the transaction was not made through a public offer given that it was made through the exercise of an option, in strict compliance with the contractual covenants contained in the strategic agreements of 1996 that were entered into with the Strategic Partner. Such agreements are acknowledged in GRUMA’s bylaws and their existence and terms were timely disclosed to the Mexican Stock Exchange and to the public and have thereafter being continuously disclosed in GRUMA’s annual report. Such acquisition was carried out against GRUMA’s shareholders equity, using funds reserved for the purchase of own shares authorized by GRUMA’s General Ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting;

F-12

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

b.3% of the capital stock of Valores Mundiales, S.L. and Consorcio Andino, S.L., holding companies of GRUMA’s subsidiaries in Venezuela, Molinos Nacionales, C.A. (“MONACA”) and Derivados de Maíz Seleccionado, C.A. (“DEMASECA”), respectively;

c.40% of the shares of Molinera de México; and

d.20% of the shares of Azteca Milling (subsidiary of Gruma Corporation), through the acquisition of 100% of the shares of Valley Holding Inc., which has no assets or liabilities other than the investment in shares of Azteca Milling.

The Equity Interests were acquired for an amount of Ps.5,741,280 (U.S.$450 million) plus acquisition related costs of Ps.162,280 and a contingent payment of up to U.S.$60 million (the “Contingent Payment”), proportionally distributed between GRUMA’s and Valores Azteca’s shares that are part of the Equity Interests, payable only if during the following 42 months after closing the transaction, certain conditions are met in connection with (i) GRUMA’s stock market price increase over the closing price of GRUMA’s stock determined for purposes of the transaction (the “Closing Price”), at the end of the 42 months’ period; (ii) the difference between GRUMA’s stock price established for public offers made by GRUMA and the Closing Price; (iii) the acquisition, by a strategic investor, of 15% or more of GRUMA’s capital stock; or (iv) the reduction of the percentage of GRUMA’s shares that are considered to be held by the public at any time, starting from 26%. The economic terms of the transaction were based on the terms contained in the Preliminary Agreement entered between the third party and the Strategic Partner, for the purchase of the Equity Interests.

In relation with the Contingent Payment and as a result of the analysis of the above mentioned assumptions, at December 31, 2012  a contingent payment liability was recognized as Other non-current liabilities amounting Ps.606,495 (U.S.$46.6 million) and affecting the Company’s equity by the amount of Ps.492,272 and the investment in associates of Ps.114,223, solely regarding the scenario (i) as mentioned in the previous paragraph, in connection to GRUMA’s stock market price increase, over GRUMA’s stock Closing Price determined for purposes of the purchase of the Equity Interests, at the end of the 42 months’ period.

The Contingent Payment liability was registered at fair value, which was determined using projected future cash flows discounted to present value and the discount rate used is the average rate of return of any corporate bonds issued by companies comparable to GRUMA. Subsequent changes in the fair value of the Contingent Payment liability will affect the GRUMA’s income statement. As of December 31, 2013, the fair value of Contingent Payment amounted Ps.671,069, affecting the income statement by Ps.64,574, within “Comprehensive financing cost, net”. The Monte Carlo simulation model was used to estimate the future shares price, which includes the expected return and the weighted volatility of historical prices of GRUMA’s stock over a period of 42 months.

The significant data used to determine the fair value of the Contingent Payment liability as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 is presented in Note 22-D.

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company does not consider as probable scenarios (ii), (iii) and (iv) for the Contingent Payment abovementioned, so there was no contingent payment obligation recorded in connection with these cases.

The effect on the acquisition of GRUMA’s Subsidiaries Shares attributable to GRUMA’s shareholders investment is as follows:

F-13

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

Carrying value of non-controlling interest	Ps.	1,914,578
Purchase price	(996,572		)
Deferred tax	77,917
Excess of book value over the purchase price of GRUMA’s Subsidiaries Shares	Ps.	995,923

To carry out the transaction of the Equity Interests, GRUMA obtained bridge loan facilities with maturity dates of up to a year for a total amount of Ps.5,103,360 (U.S.$400 million), lent by Goldman Sachs Bank USA, Banco Santander and Banco Inbursa (the “Short-Term Loan Facilities”), and used Ps.637,920 (U.S.$50 million) of Gruma Corporation’s revolving syndicated long term credit facility with Bank of America, which matures in 2016. For the execution of the Short-Term Loan Facilities, GRUMA’s permitted leverage ratios established under the loan facilities as of December 31, 2012 were increased to allow GRUMA to increase its leverage as a result of the obtainment of the Short-Term Loan Facilities. During June 2013, GRUMA obtained two long-term loan facilities which were used to settle the bridge loan facilities mentioned above (see Note 16).

4.BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

A)ALBUQUERQUE TORTILLA COMPANY

On April 15, 2011, the Company, through its subsidiary Gruma Corporation, acquired the business of manufacturing, distributing and selling of corn and wheat flour tortillas of Albuquerque Tortilla Company, which is located in New Mexico, United States, for Ps.102,410 (U.S.$8.9 million) paid in cash. This purchase was accounted for using the acquisition method, following the business combination rules. The purpose of this acquisition is to contribute to the growth and strengthening of the Company’s tortilla business in the south-central region of the United States under a strong and recognized brand.

The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the fair value of the net assets acquired:

Inventories	Ps.	1,753
Property, plant and equipment	47,700
Non-compete agreement	8,993
Customer lists	5,189
Trademarks	17,641
Fair value of identifiable assets	81,276
Goodwill	21,134
Total consideration paid in cash	Ps.	102,410

The goodwill recorded for this acquisition represents the value of acquiring an on-going business with an assembled and trained workforce, and business growth prospects in the south-central region of the United States. None of the goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

Acquisition-related costs such as advisory fees, appraisal fees, valuation services and legal fees amounted to Ps.2,497, were recognized in the income statement as selling and administrative expenses.

F-14

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

No contingent liabilities and contingent consideration arrangements have arisen from this acquisition.

From January 1, 2011 to the acquisition date, this business recorded an estimated revenue of Ps.64,979 and a net loss of approximately Ps.29,475.

B)CASA DE ORO FOODS

On August 25, 2011, the Company, through its subsidiary Gruma Corporation, acquired the business of manufacturing, distributing and selling of corn and wheat flour tortillas of Casa de Oro Foods, which is located in Nebraska, United States for Ps.280,615 (U.S.$22.7 million) paid in cash. This purchase was accounted for using the acquisition method, following the business combination rules. The strategic location of Casa de Oro will help improve and increase the Company’s coverage in the midwest region of the United States, generating savings in transportation and increasing the production of corn flour tortillas and tortilla chips.

The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the fair value of the net assets acquired:

Accounts receivable	Ps.	40,026
Inventories	16,808
Prepaid expenses	185
Current liabilities	(21,489		)
Working capital	35,530
Property, plant and equipment	122,351
Wheat forwards	1,099
Non-compete agreement	7,163
Customer lists	41,372
Trademarks	4,817
Fair value of identifiable net assets	212,332
Goodwill	68,283
Total consideration paid in cash	Ps.	280,615

The accounts receivable fair value is not significantly different from its carrying value as the receivables are short term, with the full value being collected 30 to 45 days after the acquisition.

The goodwill recorded for this acquisition represents the value of acquiring an on-going business with an assembled and trained workforce, and business growth prospects in the midwest region of the United States. None of the goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

Acquisition-related costs such as advisory fees, appraisal fees, valuation services and legal fees amounted to Ps.4,415 were recognized in the income statement as selling and administrative expenses.

From January 1, 2011 to the acquisition date, this business recorded an estimated revenue of Ps.193,938 and a net income of approximately Ps.11,747.

F-15

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

C)SOLNTSE MEXICO

On July 13, 2011, the Company, through its subsidiary Gruma International Foods, S.L., acquired all issued and outstanding shares of Solntse Mexico, which is located in Russia, for Ps.104,923 (U.S.$8.8 million). Solntse Mexico is the leading producer of corn and wheat flour tortillas, corn chips and other products, under the brand Delicados. This company introduced tortillas and corn chips to the Russian market and currently commands the leading market position in Russia’s retail and foodservice segments. This acquisition represents the Company’s entry into Russia and other Eastern Europe countries.

The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the fair value of the net assets acquired:

Cash	Ps.	6,268
Accounts receivable	11,389
Prepaid expenses	240
Inventories	15,000
Current liabilities	(7,329		)
Working capital	25,568
Property, plant and equipment	34,173
Intangible assets	1,358
Long term debt	(22,242		)
Deferred tax liabilities	(1,426		)
Fair value of identifiable net assets	37,431
Goodwill	67,492
Purchase price	104,923
Outstanding payment due to contingent consideration (1)	(22,320		)
Total consideration paid in cash	82,603

(1)As of December 31, 2013, the outstanding payment due to contingent consideration amounted to Ps.5,231.

The accounts receivable fair value is not significantly different from its carrying value as the receivables are short term with the full value being collected 30 to 45 days after the acquisition.

The goodwill recorded for this acquisition represents the value of acquiring an on-going business with an assembled and trained workforce, and business growth prospects in the Eastern Europe and Middle East regions. None of the goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

Acquisition-related costs such as advisory fees, appraisal fees, valuation services and legal fees amounted to Ps.16,367 (U.S.$1.3 million), were recognized in the income statement as selling and administrative expenses.

For the period from July 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011, this business contributed revenues of Ps.84,002 and a net income of Ps.5,556. If the acquisition had taken place on January 1, 2011, revenues and net income would have increased by approximately Ps.28,034 and Ps.2,711, respectively.

F-16

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

D)SEMOLINA A.S.

On November 16, 2011, the Company, through its subsidiary Gruma International Foods, S.L., acquired all issued and outstanding shares of Semolina A.S., which is located in Turkey, for Ps.230,388 (U.S.$17 million). Semolina is the leading corn miller in Turkey, and specializes in supplying corn grits for the snack and breakfast cereals industries. The acquisition of Semolina represents a significant milestone for the Company’s growth strategy in Eastern Europe and the Middle East. The Company’s European milling division’s priority is to consolidate itself as a market leader in corn milling and related products for the snack, brewing and breakfast cereals industries.

The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the fair value of the net assets acquired:

Cash	Ps.	3,405
Accounts receivable	33,742
Prepaid expenses	1,237
Inventories	580
Current liabilities	(45,310		)
Working capital	(6,346		)
Property, plant and equipment	48,959
Intangible assets	41
Fair value of identifiable net assets	42,654
Goodwill	187,734
Purchase price	230,388
Outstanding payment due to contingent consideration (1)	(24,413		)
Total consideration paid in cash	Ps.	205,975

(1)As of December 31, 2013, the outstanding payment due to contingent consideration was fully paid.

The accounts receivable fair value is not significantly different from its carrying value as the receivables are short term with the full value being collected 30 to 45 days after the acquisition.

The goodwill recorded for this acquisition represents the value of acquiring an on-going business with an assembled and trained workforce, and business growth prospects in the Eastern Europe and Middle East regions. None of the goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

Acquisition-related costs such as advisory fees, appraisal fees, valuation services and legal fees amounted to Ps.11,259 (U.S.$0.9 million), were recognized in the income statement as selling and administrative expenses.

For the period from November 17, 2011 to December 31, 2011, this business contributed revenues of Ps.42,624 and a net loss of Ps.12,798. If the acquisition had taken place on January 1, 2011, revenues would have increased by approximately Ps.296,988 and net loss would have decreased by approximately Ps.12,762.

F-17

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

5.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

A)  BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION

a. Subsidiaries

The subsidiaries are all entities (including structured entities) over which the Company has control. The Company controls an entity when it is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns through its power over the investee. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are considered when assessing whether the group controls another entity. The financial statements of subsidiaries are incorporated in the consolidated financial statements commencing on the date on which the control begins, until the date when that control ceases.

Intercompany transactions, balances and unrealized gains on transactions between group companies are eliminated. Unrealized losses are also eliminated. Subsidiaries’ accounting policies have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Company.

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the main subsidiaries included in the consolidation were:

	% of ownership
	At December 31, 2013	At December 31, 2012
Gruma Corporation and subsidiaries	100.00	100.00
Grupo Industrial Maseca, S.A.B. de C.V. and subsidiaries	83.18	83.18
Molinos Nacionales, C.A. (Notes 3 and 28)	—	75.86
Derivados de Maíz Seleccionado, C.A. Notes 3 and 28)	—	60.00
Molinera de México, S.A. de C.V. and subsidiaries (Note 3)	100.00	100.00
Gruma International Foods, S.L. and subsidiaries	100.00	100.00
Productos y Distribuidora Azteca, S.A. de C.V.	100.00	100.00
Investigación de Tecnología Avanzada, S.A. de C.V. and subsidiaries	100.00	100.00

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, there were no significant restrictions for the investment in the subsidiaries mentioned above, except for those described in Note 28.

b. Transactions with non-controlling interest without change of control

The Company applies a policy of treating transactions with non-controlling interest as transactions with equity owners of the Company. When purchases from non-controlling interest take place, the difference between any consideration paid and the relevant share acquired of the carrying value of net assets of the subsidiary is recognized as operations with holders of equity instruments; therefore, no goodwill is recognized with these acquisitions. Disposals to non-controlling interests result in gains and losses for the group and are also recorded in equity when there is no loss of control. See Note 3 for acquisitions of non-controlling interests during 2012.

c. Business combinations

Business combinations are recognized through the acquisition method of accounting. The consideration transferred for the acquisition of a subsidiary is measured as the fair value of the assets given, the

F-18

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

liabilities incurred by the Company with the previous owners and the equity instruments issued by the Company. The cost of an acquisition also includes the fair value of any contingent payment.

The related acquisition costs are recognized in the income statement when incurred.

Identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed and contingent liabilities in a business combination are measured at fair value at the acquisition date.

The Company recognizes any non-controlling interest as the proportional share of the net identifiable assets of the acquired entity.

The Company recognizes goodwill when the cost including any amount of non-controlling interest in the acquired entity exceeds the fair value at acquisition date of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

B) FOREIGN CURRENCY

a. Transactions in foreign currency

Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency of the Company using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at year-end exchange rates. The differences that arise from the translation of foreign currency transactions are recognized in the income statement.

b. Foreign currency translation

The financial statements of the Company’s entities are measured using the currency of the main economic environment where the entity operates (functional currency). The consolidated financial statements are presented in Mexican pesos, currency that corresponds to the presentation currency of the Company.

The financial position and results of all of the group entities that have a functional currency which differs from the Company’s presentation currency are translated as follows:

·Assets and liabilities are translated at the closing rate of the period.

·Income and expenses are translated at average exchange rates when it has not fluctuated significantly during the year.

·Equity is translated at the exchange rate in effect at the date when the contributions were made and the earnings were generated.

·All resulting exchange differences are recognized in other comprehensive income as a separate component of equity denominated “Foreign currency translation adjustments”.

Previous to the translation to Mexican pesos, the financial statements of foreign subsidiaries with functional currency from a hyperinflationary environment are adjusted by inflation in order to reflect the changes in purchasing power of the local currency. Subsequently, assets, liabilities, equity, income, costs, and expenses are translated to the presentation currency at the closing rate at the date of the most recent balance sheet. To determine the existence of hyperinflation, the Company evaluates the qualitative characteristics of the economic environment, as well as the quantitative characteristics established by IFRS of an accumulated inflation rate equal or higher than 100% in the past three years.

F-19

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

The Company applies hedge accounting to foreign exchange differences originated between the functional currency of a foreign subsidiary and the functional currency of the Company. Exchange differences resulting from the translation of a financial liability designated as hedge for a net investment in a foreign subsidiary, are recognized in other comprehensive income as a separate component denominated “Foreign currency translation adjustments” while the hedge is effective. See Note 5-L for the accounting of the net investment hedge.

The closing exchange rates used for preparing the financial statements are as follows:

	As of December 31, 2013	As of December 31, 2012
Pesos per U.S. dollar	13.0765	13.0101
Pesos per Euro	18.0430	17.1941
Pesos per Swiss franc	14.7241	14.2420
Pesos per Venezuelan bolivar (Bs.)	2.0756	3.0256
Pesos per Australian dollar	11.6443	13.4960
Pesos per Chinese yuan	2.1428	2.0685
Pesos per Pound sterling	21.5684	21.0152
Pesos per Malaysian ringgit	3.9692	4.2499
Pesos per Costa Rica colon	0.0258	0.0256
Pesos per Ukrainian hryvnia	1.6341	1.6318
Pesos per Russian ruble	0.3995	0.4283
Pesos per Turkish lira	6.1268	7.2984

C)  CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

Cash and cash equivalents include cash and short term highly liquid investments with original maturities of less than three months. These items are recognized at historical cost, which do not differ significantly from its fair value.

D)  ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Trade receivables are initially recognized at fair value and subsequently valued at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method, less provision for impairment. The Company has determined that the amortized cost does not represent significant differences with respect to the invoiced amount from short-term trade receivables, since the transactions do not have relevant associated costs.

Allowances for doubtful accounts or impairment represent the Company’s estimates of losses that could arise from the failure or inability of customers to make payments when due. These estimates are based on the ageing of customers’ balances, specific credit circumstances and the Company’s historical bad receivables experience.

E)  INVENTORIES

Inventories are measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost is determined using the average cost method. The net realizable value is the estimated selling price of inventory in the normal course of business, less applicable variable selling expenses. The cost of finished goods and production in process comprises raw materials, direct labor, other direct costs and related production overheads.

F-20

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

Cost of inventories may also include the transfer from equity of any gains or losses on qualifying cash flow hedges for purchases of raw materials.

F)  INVESTMENTS IN ASSOCIATES

Associates are all entities over which the Company has significant influence over, but does not control the financial and operative decisions. It is assumed that significant influence exists when there is a shareholding of between 20% and 50% of the voting rights of the other entity or less than 20% when it is clearly demonstrated that such significant influence exists.

Investments in associates are accounted for using the equity method of accounting and are initially recognized at cost. The Company’s investment in associates includes goodwill identified on acquisition, net of any accumulated impairment losses.

The Company’s share of its associates’ post-acquisition profits or losses is recognized in the income statement, and its share of post-acquisition movements in other comprehensive income is recognized in other comprehensive income. The cumulative post-acquisition movements are adjusted against the carrying value of the investment. When the group’s share of losses in an associate equals or exceeds its interest in the associate, including any other unsecured receivables, the Company does not recognize further losses, unless it has incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the associate. Unrealized gains and losses from transactions held with associates are eliminated from the investment in proportion to the Company’s share in the entity.

Accounting policies of associates have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Company.

G)  PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment are valued at acquisition cost, less accumulated depreciation and recognized impairment losses. Cost includes expenses that are directly attributable to the asset acquisition.

Subsequent costs, including major improvements, are capitalized and are included in the carrying value of the asset or recognized as a separate asset as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the specific asset will flow to the Company and the costs can be measured reliably. Repairs and maintenance are recognized in the income statement when incurred. Major improvements are depreciated during the remaining useful life of the related asset. Leasehold improvements are depreciated using the lower of the lease term or useful life. Land is not depreciated.

Costs of borrowings associated to financing of qualifying assets that require a substantial period of time (over one year) for acquisition or construction, are capitalized as part of the acquisition cost of these assets, until such time as the assets are substantially ready for their intended use or sale.

Depreciation is calculated over the asset cost less residual value, considering its components separately. Depreciation is recognized in income using the straight-line method and applying annual rates that reflect the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives are summarized as follows:

F-21

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

	Years
Buildings	25 – 50
Machinery and equipment	5 – 25
Leasehold improvements	10 *

* The lesser of 10 years or the term of the leasehold agreement.

The assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at the end of each reporting period.

Gains and losses from sale of assets result from the difference between revenues of the transaction and the book value of the assets, which is included in the income statement as other expenses, net.

H)  INTANGIBLE ASSETS

a. Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the Company’s share of the net identifiable assets of the acquired subsidiary at the date of acquisition. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment, or whenever the circumstances indicate that the value of the asset might be impaired. Goodwill is carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Gains and losses on the disposal of an entity include the carrying amount of goodwill related to the entity sold.

Goodwill is allocated to cash-generating units for the purpose of impairment testing. The allocation is made to those cash-generating units or groups of cash-generating units that are expected to benefit from the business combination in which the goodwill arose, identified according to operating segment.

b. Intangible assets with finite lives

Intangible assets with finite lives are carried at cost less accumulated amortization and impairment losses. Amortization is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Estimated useful lives are as follows:

	Years
Non-compete agreements	3 - 20
Patents and trademarks	3 - 20
Customer lists	5 - 20
Software for internal use	3 - 7

c. Indefinite-lived intangible assets

Indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but subject to impairment tests on an annual basis or whenever the circumstances indicate that the value of the asset might be impaired.

d. Research and development

Research costs are expensed when incurred.

F-22

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

Costs from development activities are recognized as an intangible asset when such costs can be measured reliably, the product or process is technically and commercially feasible, future economic benefits will be obtained, and the Company pretends and has sufficient resources in order to complete the development and use or sell the asset. The amortization is recognized in income based on the straight-line method during the estimated useful life of the asset.

Development costs that do not qualify as intangible assets are recognized in income when incurred.

I)  IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS

The Company performs impairment tests for its property, plant and equipment, intangible assets with finite lives, and investment in associates, when certain events and circumstances suggest that the carrying value of the assets might not be recovered. Indefinite-lived intangible assets and goodwill are subject to impairment tests at least once a year.

An impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount of an asset or cash-generating unit is the higher of an asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value in use. To determine value in use, estimated future cash flows are discounted at present value, using a pre-tax discount rate that reflect time value of money and considering the specific risks associated with the asset. For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows (cash-generating unit).

Impairment losses on goodwill are not reversed. For other assets, impairment losses are reversed if a change in the estimates used for determining the recoverable amount has occurred. Impairment losses are reversed to the extent that the book value does not exceed the book value that was determined, net of depreciation or amortization, if no impairment loss was recognized.

J)  LONG-LIVED ASSETS HELD FOR SALE AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

Long-lived assets are classified as held for sale when (a) their carrying amount is to be recovered mainly through a sale transaction, rather than through continuing use, (b) the assets are held immediately for sale and (c) the sale is considered highly probable in its current condition.

For the sale to be considered highly probable:

·Management must be committed to a sale plan.

·An active program must have begun in order to locate a buyer and to complete the plan.

·The asset must actively be quoted for its sale at a price that is reasonable to its current fair value; and

·The sale is expected to be completed within a year starting the date of classification.

Non-current assets held for sale are stated at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell. At December 31, 2012, the Company did not have this type of assets.

Discontinued operations are the operations and cash flows that can be clearly distinguished from the rest of the entity, that either have been disposed of or are classified as held for sale, and:

·Represent a line of business or geographical area of operations.

·Are part of a single coordinated plan to dispose of a line of business or geographical area of operations, or

F-23

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

·Is a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to resale.

K)  FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Regular purchases and sales of financial instruments are recognized in the balance sheet on the trade date, which is the date when the Company commits to purchase or sell the instrument.

a. Financial assets

Classification

In its initial recognition and based on its nature and characteristics, the Company classifies its financial assets in the following categories: (i) financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, (ii) loans and receivables, (iii) financial assets held until maturity, and (iv) available-for-sale financial assets. The classification depends on the purpose for which the financial assets were acquired. Balances of financial instruments held by the Company at December 31, 2013 and 2012 are disclosed in Note 22-A.

i. Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss

A financial asset is classified at fair value through profit or loss when designated as held for trading or classified as such in its initial recognition. A financial asset is classified in this category if acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the short term. Assets in this category are carried at fair value, and directly attributable transaction costs and corresponding changes of fair value are recognized in the income statement. Derivatives are also categorized as held for trading unless they are designated as hedges. Assets in this category are classified as current assets if expected to be settled within 12 months; otherwise, they are classified as non-current.

ii. Loans and receivables

Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They are included in current assets, except for assets with maturities greater than 12 months. Initially, these assets are carried at fair value plus any transaction costs directly attributable to them; subsequently, these assets are recognized at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method.

iii. Financial assets held until maturity

When the Company has the intention and capacity to keep debt instruments until maturity, these financial assets are classified as held until maturity. Initially, these assets are carried at fair value plus any transaction costs directly attributable to them; subsequently, these assets are recognized at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method.

iv. Available-for-sale financial assets

Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivative financial assets that are designated in this category or not classified in any of the other categories. They are included in current assets, except for assets with maturities greater than 12 months. These assets are initially recognized at fair value plus any transaction costs directly attributable to them; subsequently, these assets are recognized at fair value. If these assets cannot be measured through an active market, then they are measured at cost (See Note 28). Profit or losses from changes in the fair value are recognized in other

F-24

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

comprehensive income in the period when incurred. At disposition date, such profit or losses are recognized in income.

Interest on available-for-sale securities calculated using the effective interest method is recognized in the income statement as part of interest income. Dividends on available-for-sale equity instruments are recognized in the income statement when the Company’s right to receive payments is established.

Impairment

The Company assesses at each reporting date whether there is any objective evidence that a financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired. A financial asset or a group of financial assets is deemed to be impaired if, and only if, there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events that have occurred after the initial recognition of the asset (an incurred “loss event”) and that loss event has an impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset or the group of financial assets that can be reliably estimated. See Note 5-D for the accounting policy for the impairment of accounts receivable.

b. Financial liabilities

i. Debt and financial liabilities

Debt and financial liabilities that are non-derivatives are initially recognized at fair value, net of transaction costs directly attributable to them: subsequently, these liabilities are recognized at amortized cost. The difference between the net proceeds and the amount payable is recognized in the income statement during the debt term, using the effective interest rate method.

ii. Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss

Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss include financial liabilities for trading and financial liabilities designated at initial recognition.

L)  DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

Derivative financial instruments are initially recognized at fair value and are subsequently re-measured at their fair value; the transaction costs are recognized in the income statement when incurred. Derivative financial instruments are classified as current, except for maturities exceeding 12 months.

Fair value is determined based on recognized market prices. When not quoted in markets, fair value is determined using valuation techniques commonly used in the financial sector. Fair value reflects the credit risk of the instrument and includes adjustments to consider the credit risk of the Company or the counterparty, when applicable.

The method for recognizing the resulting gain or loss depends on whether the derivative is designated as a hedge and, if so, the nature of the item being hedged. The Company designates derivative financial instruments as follows:

·Hedges of the fair value of recognized assets or liabilities or a firm commitment (fair value hedge);

F-25

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

·Hedges of a particular risk associated with a recognized asset or liability or a highly probable forecast transaction (cash flow hedge); or

·Hedges of a net investment in a foreign operation (net investment hedge).

The Company documents at the inception of the transaction the relationship between hedging instruments and hedged items, including objectives, strategies for risk management and the method for assessing effectiveness in the hedge relationship.

a. Fair value hedges

Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges are recorded in the income statement, together with any changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company did not have this type of hedging.

b. Cash flow hedges

For cash flow hedge transactions, changes in the fair value of the derivative financial instrument are included as other comprehensive income in equity, based on the evaluation of the hedge effectiveness, and are reclassified to the income statement in the periods when the projected transaction is realized, see Note 22-C.

Hedge effectiveness is determined when changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged position are compensated with changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedge instrument in a quotient that ranges between 80% and 125% of inverse correlation. Ineffective portions from changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments are recognized immediately in the income statement.

When a hedging instrument expires or is sold, or when a hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, any cumulative gain or loss existing in equity at that time remains in equity and is recognized when the forecasted transaction is ultimately registered in the income statement.

c. Net investment hedge

Hedges of net investments in foreign operations are accounted for similarly to cash flow hedges. Any gain or loss on the hedging instrument relating to the effective portion of the hedge is recognized in other comprehensive income. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognized in the income statement. Gains and losses accumulated in equity are included in the income statement when the foreign operation is partially disposed of or sold, see Note 20-D.

M) LEASES

a. Operating leases

Leases in which a significant portion of the risks and rewards of ownership are retained by the lessor are classified as operating leases. Payments made under operating leases are recognized in the income statement on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease.

F-26

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

b. Finance leases

Leases where the Company has substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership, are classified as finance leases.

Under finance leases, at the initial date, both assets and liabilities are recognized at the lower of the fair value of the leased property and the present value of the minimum lease payments. In order to discount the minimum payments, the Company uses the interest rate implicit in the lease, if this practicable to determine; if not, the Company’s incremental borrowing rate is used.

Lease payments are allocated between the interest expense and the reduction of the pending liability. Interest income is recognized in each period during the lease term so as to produce a constant periodic interest rate on the remaining balance of the liability.

Property, plant and equipment acquired under finance leases is depreciated over the shorter of the useful life of the asset and the lease term.

N)  EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

a. Post-employment benefits

In Mexico, the Company has the following defined benefit plans:

·Single-payment retirement plan, when employees reach the required retirement age, which is 60.

·Seniority premium, after 15 years of service.

The Company has established trust funds in order to meet its obligations for the seniority premium. Employees do not contribute to these funds.

The liability recognized in the balance sheet in respect of defined benefit plans is the present value of the defined benefit obligation, less the fair value of plan assets. The Company determines the net interest expense (income) on the net defined benefit liability (asset) for the period by applying the discount rate used to measure the defined benefit obligation at the beginning of the annual period to the net defined benefit liability (asset). The defined benefit obligation is calculated annually by independent actuaries using the projected unit credit method.

The present value of the defined benefit obligation is determined by discounting the estimated cash outflows using discount rates in accordance with IAS-19, that are denominated in the currency in which the benefits will be paid, and that have terms to maturity approximating to the terms of the related liability.

Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions are charged or credited to equity in other comprehensive income in the period in which they arise. Past service costs are recognized immediately in the income statement.

In the United States, the Company has a savings and investment plan that incorporates voluntary employee 401 (k) contributions with matching contributions of the Company in this country. The Company’s contributions are recognized in the income statement when incurred.

F-27

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

In Venezuela, on May 7, 2012, the New Organic Labor and Workers’ Law (LOTTT) was published in the official gazette of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela and was effective as of such date. This law established some changes from the previous Organic Law issued on June 19, 1997 and amended on May 6, 2011. The most important changes included: modifications in the method of calculation of some employee benefits such as vacation bonuses, profits, pre and post natal leave, social security benefits and their interests. It also established changes in the duration of the workday, and introduced concepts as maternity labor stability. Some of the above benefits are also regulated by the collective agreements of the Company in Venezuela, which in many cases, exceed the issues raised by the new legislation.

The Company’s management has determined that the main effect of the enactment of this law is related with the retroactivity of the social security benefits and, through actuarial studies, the Company has estimated the effects on labor provisions and costs.

Until December 31, 2011, the Company determined severance amounts for employment termination in accordance with the local Labor Law and collective agreements effective at that date, and transferred these amounts to a trust for each worker. Contributions to each trust were recognized in income when incurred.

b. Termination benefits

Termination benefits are payable when employment is terminated by decision of the Company, before the normal retirement date.

The Company recognizes termination benefits as a liability at the earlier of the following dates: (a) when the Company can no longer withdraw the offer of those benefits; and (b) when the Company recognizes costs for a restructuring representing a provision and involves the payment of termination benefits. Termination benefits that do not meet this requirement are recognized in the income statement in the period when incurred.

c. Short term benefits

Short term employee benefits are measured at nominal base and are recognized as expenses as the service is rendered. If the Company has the legal or constructive obligation to pay as a result of a service rendered by the employee in the past and the amount can be estimated, an obligation is recognized for short term bonuses or profit sharing.

O)  PROVISIONS

Provisions are recognized when (a) the Company has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events; (b) it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation; and (c) the amount has been reliably estimated.

Provisions are measured at the present value of the expenditures expected to be required to settle the obligation using a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the specific risks of the obligation. The increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognized as interest expense.

F-28

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

P)  SHARE CAPITAL

Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds.

Q)  REVENUE RECOGNITION

Sales are recognized upon shipment to, and acceptance by, the Company’s customers or when the risk of ownership has passed to the customers. Revenue comprises the fair value of the consideration received or receivable, net of returns, discounts, and rebates. Provisions for discounts and rebates to customers, returns and other adjustments are recognized in the same period that the related sales are recorded and are based upon either historical estimates or actual terms.

R)  INCOME TAXES

The tax expense of the period comprises current and deferred tax. Tax is recognized in the income statement, except to the extent that it relates to items recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity. In this case, the tax is also recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity, respectively.

The current income tax charge is calculated on the basis of the tax laws enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date in the countries where the Company and its subsidiaries operate and generate taxable income. Management periodically evaluates positions taken in tax returns with respect to situations in which applicable tax regulation is subject to interpretation. It establishes provisions where appropriate on the basis of amounts expected to be paid to the tax authorities.

Deferred income tax is recognized from the analysis of the balance sheet considering temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts. Deferred income tax is determined using tax rates that have been enacted at the date of the balance sheet and are expected to apply when the related deferred income tax asset is realized or the deferred income tax liability is settled.

Deferred income tax assets are recognized for tax loss carry-forwards not used, tax credits and deductible temporary differences, only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilized. In each period-end deferred income tax assets are reviewed and reduced to the extent that it is not probable that the benefits will be realized.

Deferred income tax is provided on temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries and associates, except where the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference is controlled by the Company and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if the entity has a legally enforceable right to set off assets against liabilities and are related to income tax levied by the same tax authority on the same taxable entity or different taxable entities where there is an intention to settle the balances on a net basis.

S)  EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit attributable to equity holders of the Company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year, excluding ordinary shares purchased by the Company and held as treasury shares. Diluted earnings per share is

F-29

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding to assume conversion of all dilutive potential ordinary shares, which include convertible debt and share options.

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company had no dilutive instruments issued.

T)  SEGMENT REPORTING

An operating segment is a component of the Company that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses, including revenues and expenses relating to transactions with other components of the same entity. Operating results from an operating segment are regularly reviewed by the entity’s chief executive officer to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance, and for which discrete financial information is available.

6.RISK AND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

A)  RISK MANAGEMENT

The Company is exposed to a variety of financial risks: market risk (including currency risk, interest rate risk, and commodity price risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. The group’s overall risk management focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimize potential adverse effects on financial performance. The Company uses derivative financial instruments to hedge some of these risks.

Currency risk

The Company operates internationally and thus, is exposed to currency risks, particularly with the U.S. dollar. Currency risks arise from commercial operations, recognized assets and liabilities and net investments in foreign subsidiaries.

The following tables detail the exposure of the Company to currency risks at December 31, 2013 and 2012. The tables show the carrying amount of the Company’s financial instruments denominated in foreign currency.

At December 31, 2013:

	Amounts in thousands of Mexican pesos
	U.S. Dollar			Pound sterling			Euros			Costa Rica colons and others			Total
Monetary assets:
Current (1)	Ps.	2,776,046		Ps.	265,952		Ps.	764,541		Ps.	1,077,969		Ps.	4,884,508
Non-current	9,912			—			7,406			10,854			28,172
Monetary liabilities:
Current	(5,459,193		)	(271,561		)	(247,916		)	(544,162		)	(6,522,832		)
Non-current	(9,536,365		)	(2,157		)	(20,864		)	(53,503		)	(9,612,889		)
Net position	Ps.	(12,209,600	)	Ps.	(7,766	)	Ps.	503,167		Ps.	491,158		Ps.	(11,223,041	)

F-30

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

At December 31, 2012:

	Amounts in thousands of Mexican pesos
	U.S. Dollar			Pound sterling			Venezuelan bolivar			Euros			Costa Rica colons and others			Total
Monetary assets:
Current (1)	Ps.	3,072,982		Ps.	276,579		Ps.	1,584,590		Ps.	262,465		Ps.	1,229,180		Ps.	6,425,796
Non-current	10,442			—			1,538			1,655			15,498			29,133
Monetary liabilities:
Current	(10,312,030		)	(212,532		)	(1,584,472		)	(182,780		)	(583,534		)	(12,875,348		)
Non-current	(12,498,676		)	(1,080		)	(95,132		)	(52,504		)	(70,210		)	(12,717,602		)
Net position	Ps.	(19,727,282	)	Ps.	62,967		Ps.	(93,476	)	Ps.	28,836		Ps.	590,934		Ps.	(19,138,021	)

(1)Approximately 70% of this balance corresponds to accounts receivable.

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the effects of exchange rate differences on the Company’s monetary assets and liabilities were recognized as follows:

	2013			2012			2011
Exchange differences arising from foreign currency liabilities accounted for as a hedge of the Company’s net investment in foreign subsidiaries, recorded directly to equity as an effect of foreign currency translation adjustments	Ps.	(46,412	)	Ps.	468,381		Ps.	(813,101	)
Exchange differences arising from foreign currency transactions recognized in the income statement	55,763			(82,212		)	41,217
	Ps.	9,351		Ps.	386,169		Ps.	(771,884	)

Net sales are denominated in Mexican pesos, U.S. dollars, and other currencies. Sales generated in Mexican pesos were 39% in 2013, 41% in 2012 and 34% in 2011 of total net sales. Sales generated in U.S. dollars during 2013 were 46%, in 2012 and 2011were 45% of total net sales. Additionally, at December 31, 2013 and 2012, 71% and 63% of total assets were denominated in different currencies other than Mexican pesos, mainly in U.S. dollars. An important portion of operations are financed through debt denominated in U.S. dollars. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, net sales in foreign currency amounted to Ps.32,925,736, Ps.32,139,710 and Ps.28,663,315, respectively.

An important currency risk for the debt denominated in U.S. dollars is present in subsidiaries that are not located in the United States, which represented 90% of total debt denominated in U.S. dollars.

At December 31, 2013, the Company had foreign exchange derivative instruments for a nominal amount of U.S.$65 million maturing in January 2014. The purpose of these instruments is to hedge the risks related to exchange rate variations on corn price, which is denominated in U.S. dollars. At December 31, 2012, the Company had no open positions of foreign exchange derivative instruments.

The effect of foreign exchange differences recognized in the income statements for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, related with the assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency, totaled a gain of Ps.55,763, a loss of Ps.(82,212) and a gain of Ps.41,217, respectively. Considering the exposure at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, and assuming an increase or decrease

F-31

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

of 10% in the exchange rates while keeping constant the rest of the variables such as interest rates, the effect after taxes in the Company’s consolidated results will be Ps.35,796, Ps.458,069 and Ps.128,673, respectively.

Interest rate risk

The variations in interest rates could affect the interest expense of financial liabilities bearing variable interest rates, and could also modify the fair value of financial liabilities bearing fixed interest rates.

For the Company, interest rate risk is mainly derived from debt financing transactions, including debt securities, bank and vendor credit facilities and leases. These financing transactions generate exposure to interest rate risk, principally due to changes in relevant base rates (mainly, LIBOR, and to a lesser extent, TIIE and Eurolibor) that are used to determine the interest rates applicable to the borrowings.

The following table shows, at December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company’s debt at fixed and variable rates:

	Amounts in thousands of Mexican pesos
	2013		2012
Debt at fixed interest rate	Ps.	3,747,511	Ps.	3,734,498
Debt at variable interest rate	12,624,829		16,136,973
Total	Ps.	16,372,340	Ps.	19,871,471

From time to time, the Company uses derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps for the purposes of hedging a portion of its debt, in order to reduce the Company’s exposure to increases in interest rates.

For variable rate debt, an increase in interest rates will increase interest expense. A hypothetical increase of 100 basis points in interest rates on debt at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 will have an effect on the results of the Company of Ps.126,248, Ps.161,370 and Ps.88,246, respectively, considering debt and interest rates at that date, and assuming that the rest of the variables remain constant.

Commodity price risk and derivatives

The availability and price of corn, wheat and other agricultural commodities and fuels are subject to wide fluctuations due to factors outside of the Company’s control, such as weather, plantings, government (domestic and foreign) farm programs and policies, changes in global demand/supply and global production of similar and competitive crops, as well as fuels. The Company hedges a portion of its production requirements through commodity futures and options contracts in order to reduce the risk created by price fluctuations and supply of corn, wheat, natural gas, diesel and soy oils which exist as part of ongoing business operations. The open positions for hedges of purchases do not exceed the maximum production requirements for a period no longer than 18 months, based on the Company’s corporate policies.

During 2013, the Company entered into short-term hedge transactions through commodity futures and options to hedge a portion of its requirements. All derivative financial instruments are recorded at their fair value as either assets or liabilities. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded each period in earnings or accumulated other comprehensive income in equity, depending on whether the derivative

F-32

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

qualifies for hedge accounting and is effective as part of a hedge transaction. Ineffectiveness results when the change in the fair value of the hedge instruments differs from the change in the fair value of the position.

For hedge transactions that qualify and are effective, gains and losses are deferred until the underlying asset or liability is settled, and then are recognized as part of that transaction.

Gains and losses which represent hedge ineffectiveness and derivative transactions that do not qualify for hedge accounting are recognized in the income statement.

At December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, financial instruments that qualify as hedge accounting represented an unfavorable effect of Ps.71,540 in 2013 and a favorable effect of Ps.119,275 and Ps.14,876 in 2012 and 2011, respectively, which was recognized as comprehensive income in equity.

From time to time the Company hedges commodity price risks utilizing futures and options strategies that do not qualify for hedge accounting. As a result of non-qualification, these derivative financial instruments are recognized at their fair values and the associated effect is recorded in current period earnings. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized an favorable effect of Ps.17,090 and unfavorable of Ps.40,207, respectively. Additionally, as of December 31, 2013 the Company realized Ps.30,160 in net losses on commodity price risk hedges that did not qualify for hedge accounting; likewise, as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, realized net gains of Ps.21,058 and net losses of Ps.52,626, respectively.

Based on the Company’s overall commodity exposure at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, a hypothetical 10 percent decline in market prices applied to the fair value of these instruments would result in an effect to the income statement of Ps.54,568, Ps.68,811 and Ps.40,431, respectively (for non-qualifying contracts).

In Mexico, to support the commercialization of corn for Mexican corn growers, Mexico’s Secretary of Agriculture, Livestock, Rural Development, Fisheries and Food Ministry (Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación, or SAGARPA), through the Agricultural Incentives and Services Agency (Apoyos y Servicios a la Comercialización Agropecuaria, or ASERCA), a government agency founded in 1991, implemented a program designed to promote corn sales in Mexico. The program includes the following objectives:

·Ensure that the corn harvest is brought to market, providing certainty to farmers concerning the sale of their crops and supply security for the buyer.

·Establish a minimum price for the farmer, and a maximum price for the buyer, which are determined based on international market prices, plus a basic formula specific for each region.

·Implement a corn hedging program to allow both farmers and buyers to minimize their exposure to price fluctuations in the international markets.

To the extent that this or other similar programs are canceled by the Mexican government, we may be required to incur additional costs in purchasing corn for our operations, and therefore we may need to increase the prices of our products to reflect such additional costs.

F-33

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

Credit risk

The Company’s regular operations expose it to defaults when customers and counterparties are unable to comply with their financial or other commitments. The Company seeks to mitigate this risk by entering into transactions with a diverse pool of counterparties. However, the Company continues to remain subject to unexpected third party financial failures that could disrupt its operations.

The Company is also exposed to risks in connection with its cash management activities and temporary investments, and any disruption that affects its financial intermediaries could also adversely affect its operations.

The Company’s exposure to risk due to trade receivables is limited given the large number of its customers located in different parts of Mexico, the United States, Central America, Europe, Asia and Oceania. For this reason, there is not a significant concentration of credit risk. However, the Company still maintains reserves for credit losses. Risk control assesses the credit quality of the customer, taking into account its financial position, past experience and other factors.

Since most of the clients do not have an independent rating of credit quality, the Company’s management determines the maximum credit risk for each one, taking into account its financial position, past experience, and other factors. Credit limits are established according to policies set by the Company, which also includes controls that assure its compliance.

During 2013 and 2012, credit limits were complied with and, consequently, management does not expect any important losses from trade accounts receivable.

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company has certain accounts receivable that are neither past due or impaired. The credit quality of such receivables does not present indications of impairment, since the sales are performed to a large variety of clients that include supermarkets, government institutions, commercial businesses and tortilla sellers. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, none of these accounts receivable presented non-performance by these counterparties.

The Company has centralized its treasury operations in Mexico, and in the United States for its operations in that country. Liquid assets are invested primarily in government bonds and short term debt instruments with a minimum grade of “A1/P1” in the case of operations in the United States and “A” for operations in Mexico. For operations in Central America, only invests cash reserves with leading local banks and local branches of international banks. Additionally, small investments are maintained abroad. The Company faces credit risk from potential defaults of their counterparts with respect to financial instruments they use. Substantially all of these financial instruments are not guaranteed. Additionally, it minimizes the risk of default by the counterparts contracting derivative financial instruments only with major national and international financial institutions using contracts and standard forms issued by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (“ISDA”) and operations standard confirmation formats.

Investment risk in Venezuela

The recent political and civil instability that has prevailed in Venezuela represents a risk to the Company’s investment in this country. The Company does not have insurance for the risk of expropriation of its investments. See Note 28 for additional information about the expropriation proceedings of MONACA assets and the measures taken by the People´s Defense Institute for the Access of Goods and Services of Venezuela (Instituto para la Defensa de las Personas en el Acceso a

F-34

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

los Bienes y Servicios de Venezuela, or INDEPABIS) in DEMASECA. Starting January 23, 2014 the activities of INDEPABIS were assumed by the Superintendencia Nacional para la Defensa de los Derechos Socio Económicos.

Considering the above, the financial position and results of the Company may be negatively affected due to the inability to obtain and collect a fair and reasonable compensation for the assets of MONACA and DEMASECA subject to expropriation.

The exchange rate controlled by the Foreign Exchange Administration Commission (Comisión de Administración de Divisas, CADIVI ) at December 31, 2012 was 4.30 Venezuelan bolivars per U.S. dollar. Certain entities in specific sectors such as the food industry, were allowed to use foreign currency to settle accounts payable or to remit dividends using the exchange rate established by CADIVI. There are often substantial delays to obtain foreign currency through this mechanism.

In March 2013, the Venezuelan government announced the creation of an alternative exchange mechanism called the Supplementary System of Foreign Exchange Administration (Sistema Complementario de Administración de Divisas, SICAD). The SICAD operates as an auction system that allows entities of specific sectors to buy foreign currency for imports. This is not a free auction (that is, the counterpart that offers the highest price does not necessarily have the right to receive the foreign currency). Each auction may have different rules (for example, the minimum and maximum amount of foreign currency that may be offered to exchange). Limited amounts of dollars are available and entities do not commonly get the full amount for which they entered in auction. During December 2013, the Venezuelan government authorized the Central Bank of Venezuela to publish the average exchange rate resulting of SICAD auctions. During weeks of December 23 and December 30, 2013, the Central Bank of Venezuela published on its website the average exchange rate for auctions No.13 and No.14 (11.30 Venezuelan bolivars per U.S. dollar).

On January 24, 2014, Exchange Agreement No. 25 became effective, which establishes the concepts to which the SICAD exchange rate (11.30 Venezuelan bolivars per U.S. dollar) applies to, for sale of foreign currency operations. In addition, the agreement also provides that the sale operation of foreign currency, whose clearance has been requested to the Central Bank of Venezuela before the Exchange Agreement No. 25 became effective, will be settled at the exchange rate effective on the date on which such operations were authorized. This Exchange Agreement No.25 will result in a net foreign exchange loss of Ps.142,079 in 2014, which will be presented as discontinued operations, this exchange loss is originated by certain accounts receivable maintained with the Venezuelan companies as of December 31, 2013 which are expected to be settled at this new exchange rate (11.30 Venezuelan bolivars per U.S. dollar).

The only mechanism permitted to obtain foreign currency for remittance of dividends outside of Venezuela is the CADIVI. Foreign currency (U.S. dollars) has not been authorized for dividend payments outside of Venezuela in the past five years.

Due to the aforementioned, it is important to consider the exchange rate that will be more appropriate when cash flows are remitted outside of Venezuela.

Liquidity risk

The Company funds its liquidity and capital resource requirements, in the ordinary course of business, through a variety of sources, including:

F-35

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

·cash generated from operations;

·committed and uncommitted short-term and long-term lines of credit;

·medium- and long-term debt contracting;

·offerings in Bond markets; and

·sales of its equity securities and those of its subsidiaries and affiliates from time to time.

Factors that could decrease the sources of liquidity include a significant decrease in the demand for, or price of, products, each of which could limit the amount of cash generated from operations, and a lowering of the corporate credit rating or any other credit downgrade, which could further impair the liquidity and increase costs with respect to new debt and cause stock price to suffer. The Company’s liquidity is also affected by factors such as the depreciation or appreciation of the peso and changes in interest rates.

The following tables show the remaining contractual maturities of financial liabilities of the Company:

At December 31, 2013:

	Less than a year		From 1 to 3 years		From 3 to 5 years		More than 5 years		Total
Short and long term debt	Ps.	3,272,118	Ps.	4,262,055	Ps.	5,153,781	Ps.	3,922,950	Ps.	16,610,904
Interest payable from short and long term debt	687,821		1,214,130		897,858		304,029		3,103,838
Financing leases	3,771		11,024		—		—		14,795
Trade accounts and other payables	8,003,004		—		—		—		8,003,004
Other non-current liabilities	—		671,069		—		—		671,069
Derivative financial instruments	71,540		—		—		—		71,540
	Ps.	12,038,254	Ps.	6,158,278	Ps.	6,051,639	Ps.	4,226,979	Ps.	28,475,150

At December 31, 2012:

	Less than a year		From 1 to 3 years		From 3 to 5 years		More than 5 years		Total
Short and long term debt	Ps.	8,043,091	Ps.	755,849	Ps.	6,704,466	Ps.	4,623,030	Ps.	20,126,436
Interest payable from short and long term debt	746,613		1,084,968		852,808		628,022		3,312,411
Financing leases	20,077		18,839		—		—		38,916
Trade accounts and other payables	9,434,272		—		—		—		9,434,272
Other non-current liabilities	—		—		606,495		—		606,495
Derivative financial instruments	28,832		—		—		—		28,832
	Ps.	18,272,885	Ps.	1,859,656	Ps.	8,163,769	Ps.	5,251,052	Ps.	33,547,362

The Company expects to meet its obligations with cash flows generated by operations. Additionally, the Company has access to credit lines with various banks to address potential cash needs.

F-36

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

B) CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

The Company’s objectives when managing capital (which includes share capital, borrowings, working capital and cash and cash equivalents) are to maintain a flexible capital structure that reduces the cost of capital to an acceptable level of risk, to safeguard the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern while taking advantage of strategic opportunities in order to provide sustainable returns for shareholders and benefits to stockholders.

The Company manages the capital structure and makes adjustments to it in light of changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of the underlying assets. In order to maintain the capital structure, the Company may adjust the amount of dividends paid to shareholders, return capital to shareholders, repurchase shares currently issued, issue new shares, issue new debt, issue new debt to replace existing debt with different characteristics and/or sell assets to reduce debt.

In addition, to monitor capital, debt agreements contain financial covenants which are disclosed in Note 16.

7.SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company’s reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products in different geographical regions. These business units are managed separately because each business segment requires different technology and marketing strategies.

The Company’s reportable segments are as follows:

·Corn flour and packaged tortilla division (United States and Europe):

Manufactures and distributes more than 20 varieties of corn flour that are used mainly to produce and distribute different types of tortillas and tortilla chip products in the United States. The main brands are MASECA for corn flour and MISSION and GUERRERO for packaged tortillas.

·Corn flour division (Mexico):

Engaged principally in the production, distribution and sale of corn flour in Mexico under MASECA brand. Corn flour produced by this division is used mainly in the preparation of tortillas and other related products.

·Corn flour, wheat flour and other products division (Venezuela):

Engaged, mainly, in producing and distributing grains used principally for industrial and human consumption. The main brands are JUANA, TIA BERTA and DECASA for corn flour; ROBIN HOOD and POLAR for wheat flour; MONICA for rice and LASSIE for oats.

·Other segments:

This section represents those segments whose amounts on an individual basis do not exceed 10% of the consolidated total of net sales, operating income and assets. These segments are:

a)Corn flour, hearts of palm, rice, and other products (Central America).

b)Wheat flour (México).

c)Packaged tortillas (México).

d)Wheat flour tortillas and snacks (Asia and Oceania).

e)Technology and equipment, which conducts research and development regarding flour and tortilla manufacturing equipment, produces machinery for corn flour and tortilla production and is engaged in the construction of the Company’s corn flour manufacturing facilities.

F-37

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

All inter-segment sales prices are market-based. The Chief Executive Officer evaluates performance based on operating income of the respective business units. The accounting policies for the reportable segments are the same as the policies described in Notes 2 and 5.

Segment information as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013:

	Corn flour and packaged tortilla division (United States and Europe)		Corn flour division (Mexico)		Other segments		Eliminations and corporate expenses			Total
Net sales to external customers	Ps.	27,760,984	Ps.	15,790,150	Ps.	10,482,332	Ps.	72,839		Ps.	54,106,305
Inter-segmentnet sales	39,639		645,675		1,236,873		(1,922,187		)	—
Operating income(loss)	2,136,570		2,437,503		365,838		(109,313		)	4,830,598
Depreciation and amortization	1,066,910		332,923		276,381		5,469			1,681,683
Total assets	17,364,824		11,547,873		10,384,077		3,311,866			42,608,640
Investment in associates	—		—		64,713		84,168			148,881
Total liabilities	8,942,631		4,238,286		3,204,957		11,795,906			28,181,780
Expenditures forfixed assets	849,693		566,512		246,856		(194,735		)	1,468,326

Segment information as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012:

	Corn flour and packaged tortilla division (United States and Europe)		Corn flour division (Mexico)		Discontinued operations (Venezuela)		Other segments		Eliminations and corporate expenses			Total
Net sales to external customers	Ps.	26,900,883	Ps.	16,809,903	Ps.	—	Ps.	10,662,239	Ps.	36,425		Ps.	54,409,450
Inter-segmentnet sales	30,672		763,547		—		1,303,796		(2,098,015		)	—
Operating income(loss)	1,334,615		1,749,259		—		27,411		(297,275		)	2,814,010
Depreciation and amortization	1,058,384		357,097		—		312,037		(95,431		)	1,632,087
Total assets	17,600,503		12,793,474		7,087,569		11,318,494		660,362			49,460,402
Investment in associates	—		—		—		146,388		1,009,863			1,156,251
Total liabilities	7,931,084		3,808,836		2,948,192		4,630,339		15,808,234			35,126,685
Expenditures forfixed assets	1,630,227		451,771		—		393,171		117,939			2,593,108

F-38

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

Segment information as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011:

	Corn flour and packaged tortilla division (United States and Europe)		Corn flour division (Mexico)		Discontinued operations (Venezuela)		Other segments			Eliminations and corporate expenses			Total
Net sales to external customers	Ps.	23,900,928	Ps.	14,799,007	Ps.	—	Ps.	9,643,075		Ps.	145,136		Ps.	48,488,146
Inter-segmentnet sales	196,857		586,733		—		1,128,926			(1,912,516		)	—
Operating income(loss)	946,806		1,770,725		—		(183,752		)	(106,434		)	2,427,345
Depreciation and amortization	1,004,467		356,171		—		323,051			(76,302		)	1,607,387
Total assets	16,860,083		11,618,882		6,430,234		10,460,321			(826,902		)	44,542,618
Investment in associates	—		—		—		143,700			—			143,700
Total liabilities	7,074,787		3,451,518		3,021,882		3,919,903			9,361,744			26,829,834
Expenditures forfixed assets	858,475		238,958		—		404,051			133,762			1,635,246

A summary of information by geographic segment for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 is presented below:

	2013		%	2012		%	2011		%
Net sales to external customers:
United States and Europe	Ps.	27,760,984	52	Ps.	26,900,883	50	Ps.	23,900,928	49
Mexico	21,180,569		39	22,269,740		41	19,870,195		41
Central America	3,385,916		6	3,368,693		6	3,180,155		7
Asia and Oceania	1,778,836		3	1,870,134		3	1,536,868		3
	Ps.	54,106,305	100	Ps.	54,409,450	100	Ps.	48,488,146	100
Capital expenditures:
United States and Europe	Ps.	849,693	59	Ps.	1,630,227	63	Ps.	858,475	53
Mexico	444,838		30	839,736		32	470,977		29
Central America	49,614		3	70,078		3	88,508		5
Asia and Oceania	124,181		8	53,067		2	217,286		13
	Ps.	1,468,326	100	Ps.	2,593,108	100	Ps.	1,635,246	100
Identifiable assets
United States and Europe	Ps.	17,364,824	41	Ps.	17,600,503	36	Ps.	16,860,083	38
Mexico	19,510,613		46	18,695,391		38	15,052,360		34
Discontinued operations (Venezuela)	—		—	7,087,569		14	6,430,234		14
Central America	2,239,126		5	2,376,482		5	2,408,555		5
Asia and Oceania	3,494,077		8	3,700,457		7	3,791,386		9
	Ps.	42,608,640	100	Ps.	49,460,402	100	Ps.	44,542,618	100

F-39

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

8. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

Cash and cash equivalents include:

	At December 31, 2013		At December 31,2012
Cash at bank	Ps.	809,905	Ps.	1,245,911
Short-term investments (less than 3 months)	528,650		41,457
	Ps.	1,338,555	Ps.	1,287,368

9. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Accounts receivable comprised the following:

	At December 31, 2013			At December 31, 2012
Trade accounts and notes receivable	Ps.	5,177,963		Ps.	6,530,563
Accounts receivable with Venezuelan companies	1,137,718			—
Employees	9,545			26,339
Recoverable value-added tax	901,570			485,608
Other debtors	294,377			374,249
Allowance for doubtful accounts	(327,856		)	(368,234		)
	Ps.	7,193,317		Ps.	7,048,525

The age analysis of accounts receivable is as follows:

				Not past due		Past due balances
	Total			datebalances		1 to 120days			121 to 240days			More than 240 days
Accounts receivable	Ps.	7,521,173		Ps.	4,577,857	Ps.	1,494,638		Ps.	82,260		Ps.	1,366,418
Allowance for doubtful accounts	(327,856		)	—		(100,836		)	(50,217		)	(176,803		)
Total at December 31, 2013	Ps.	7,193,317		Ps.	4,577,857	Ps.	1,393,802		Ps.	32,043		Ps.	1,189,615

				Not past due		Past due balances
	Total			date balances		1 to 120days			121 to 240days			More than 240 days
Accounts receivable	Ps.	7,416,759		Ps.	4,525,500	Ps.	2,252,425		Ps.	188,609		Ps.	450,225
Allowance for doubtful accounts	(368,234		)	—		(119,800		)	(57,260		)	(191,174		)
Total at December 31, 2012	Ps.	7,048,525		Ps.	4,525,500	Ps.	2,132,625		Ps.	131,349		Ps.	259,051

F-40

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the movements on the allowance for doubtful accounts are as follows:

	2013			2012
Beginning balance	Ps.	(368,234	)	Ps.	(316,112	)
Allowance for doubtful accounts	(52,208		)	(116,240		)
Receivables written off during the year	92,700			54,610
Exchange differences	(114		)	9,508
Ending balance	Ps.	(327,856	)	Ps.	(368,234	)

10. INVENTORIES

Inventories consisted of the following:

	At December31, 2013		At December31, 2012
Raw materials, mainly corn and wheat	Ps.	5,182,139	Ps.	9,513,318
Finished products	925,917		1,018,452
Materials and spare parts	1,132,007		1,346,546
Production in process	148,755		220,439
Advances to suppliers	76,223		416,487
Inventory in transit	179,089		466,700
Raw material loans (1)	—		402,048
	Ps.	7,644,130	Ps.	13,383,990

(1)Total amount due at December 31, 2012 related to physical loans of grains to government companies in Venezuela, which was received during 2013.

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the cost of raw materials consumed and the changes in the inventories of production in process and finished goods, recognized as cost of sales amounted to Ps.23,579,575, Ps.26,409,848 and Ps.29,562,447, respectively.

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized Ps.69,854, Ps.90,584 and Ps.76,086, respectively, for inventory that was damaged, slow-moving and obsolete.

11. LONG-TERM NOTES AND ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Long-term notes and accounts receivable are as follows:

	At December 31,2013		At December 31,2012
Long-term notes receivable from sale of tortilla machines	Ps.	144,142	Ps.	199,925
Prepaid rent deposits	—		98,792
Guarantee deposits	29,874		29,324
Long-term recoverable value-added tax	6,531		6,716
Other	10,316		12,187
	Ps.	190,863	Ps.	346,944

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, long-term notes receivable are denominated in pesos, maturing from 2015 to 2017 and bearing an average interest rate of 16.5%, for both years.

F-41

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

12. INVESTMENT IN ASSOCIATES

Investment in associates is comprised of the following:

	AtDecember 31, 2013		AtDecember 31, 2012
Valores Azteca, S.A. de C.V (Mexican company)	Ps.	—	Ps.	1,009,863
Harinera de Monterrey, S.A. de C.V (Mexican company)	148,881		146,388
	Ps.	148,881	Ps.	1,156,251

The percentage of interest held in associates is:

	AtDecember 31, 2013		AtDecember 31, 2012
Valores Azteca, S.A. de C.V	—		45	%
Harinera de Monterrey, S.A. de C.V	40	%	40	%

Valores Azteca, S.A. de C.V.

The Extraordinary Stockholders’ Meeting held on May 15, 2013 agreed on the merger by incorporation of Valores Azteca as merged company that is extinguished, with GRUMA as merging company. In accordance with this merger, GRUMA as owner of 45% of the capital stock of Valores Azteca, received 24,566,561 ordinary shares, with no par value, Series B, Class I, of GRUMA. The effect in the Company’s equity as a result of this merger was $1,009.8 million pesos, derived from cancellation of the Company’s investment in Valores Azteca, whose only asset was represented by GRUMA’s shares.

At December 31, 2012, Valores Azteca had 9.66% of the outstanding shares of the Company. As of December 31, 2012 and until the date of the merger, Valores Azteca had assets amounting to Ps.1,094,016 and no liabilities. From January 1, 2013 and until the date of the merger, Valores Azteca did not perform any operation and for the year ended December 31, 2012, had no revenues and reported a net profit of Ps.107,963. Valores Azteca was a private company and did not perform any operation or activity besides owning the shares of GRUMA. Derived from the multiple transactions completed on December 14, 2012, see Note 3, the Company acquired 45% of the outstanding shares of Valores Azteca.

Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A.B. de C.V.

During January 2011, the Company decided to sell its 8.7966% interest in the capital stock of Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A.B. de C.V. (GFNorte). On February 15, 2011, the sale of 177,546,496 shares of the capital stock of GFNorte was concluded, resulting in cash proceeds of Ps.9,232,418, before fees and expenses. The accounting result was a profit before taxes of approximately Ps.4,707,804 net of fees and expenses. The sale was authorized by the Mexican Banking Securities and Exchange Commission (CNBV) and was carried out through a secondary public offering in Mexico and a private offering in the United States and other foreign markets, for a simultaneous global offering.

Until the date of GFNorte’s sale, the Company had significant influence over this associate due to its representation on the Board of Directors of GFNorte through the Company’s principal shareholder.

F-42

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

13. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Changes in property, plant and equipment for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

	Land and buildings			Machinery and equipment			Leasehold improvements			Construction in progress			Total
At December 31, 2011
Cost	Ps.	8,914,511		Ps.	28,427,554		Ps.	1,043,612		Ps.	710,344		Ps.	39,096,021
Accumulated depreciation	(2,746,910		)	(15,363,541		)	(469,937		)	—			(18,580,388		)
Net book value	Ps.	6,167,601		Ps.	13,064,013		Ps.	573,675		Ps.	710,344		Ps.	20,515,633
For the year ended December 31, 2012
Opening net book value	Ps.	6,167,601		Ps.	13,064,013		Ps.	573,675		Ps.	710,344		Ps.	20,515,633
Exchange differences	(70,181		)	(301,221		)	(32,672		)	(91,446		)	(495,520		)
Additions	85,874			815,259			43,036			1,840,418			2,784,587
Disposals	(1,488		)	(244,407		)	(16,679		)	(980		)	(263,554		)
Depreciation charge from continuing operations	(177,541		)	(1,209,406		)	(81,766		)	—			(1,468,713		)
Transfers (1)	8,884			902,720			143,666			(1,055,270		)	—
Impairment	—			(4,014		)	—			—			(4,014		)
Discontinued operations	(28,302		)	(117,695		)	(4,888		)	—			(150,885		)
Closing net book value	Ps.	5,984,847		Ps.	12,905,249		Ps.	624,372		Ps.	1,403,066		Ps.	20,917,534
At December 31, 2012
Cost	Ps.	8,908,549		Ps.	28,915,146		Ps.	1,152,567		Ps.	1,403,066		Ps.	40,379,328
Accumulated depreciation	(2,923,702		)	(16,009,897		)	(528,195		)	—			(19,461,794		)
Net book value	Ps.	5,984,847		Ps.	12,905,249		Ps.	624,372		Ps.	1,403,066		Ps.	20,917,534
For the year ended December 31, 2013
Opening net book value	Ps.	5,984,847		Ps.	12,905,249		Ps.	624,372		Ps.	1,403,066		Ps.	20,917,534
Exchange differences	(53,934		)	(46,458		)	6,951			2,659			(90,782		)
Additions	6,691			384,303			1,953			1,075,379			1,468,326
Disposals	(7,680		)	(221,036		)	(8,578		)	(11,919		)	(249,213		)
Depreciation charge from continuing operations	(176,660		)	(1,151,012		)	(90,201		)	—			(1,417,873		)
Transfers to assets held for sale	—			(103,300		)	—			—			(103,300		)
Transfers (1)	160,523			1,196,601			209,329			(1,566,453		)	—
Impairment	—			(16,930		)	—			—			(16,930		)
Discontinued operations	(861,806		)	(1,604,956		)	(6,121		)	(129,907		)	(2,602,790		)
Closing net book value	Ps.	5,051,981		Ps.	11,342,461		Ps.	737,705		Ps.	772,825		Ps.	17,904,972
At December 31, 2013
Cost	Ps.	7,747,517		Ps.	26,801,643		Ps.	1,314,759		Ps.	772,825		Ps.	36,636,744
Accumulated depreciation	(2,695,536		)	(15,459,182		)	(577,054		)	—			(18,731,772		)
Net book value	Ps.	5,051,981		Ps.	11,342,461		Ps.	737,705		Ps.	772,825		Ps.	17,904,972

(1)Transfers correspond to capitalizations of construction in progress.

F-43

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, depreciation expense was recognized as follows:

	2013		2012		2011
Cost of sales	Ps.	1,132,389	Ps.	1,168,931	Ps.	1,093,318
Selling and administrative expenses	285,484		299,782		263,938
	Ps.	1,417,873	Ps.	1,468,713	Ps.	1,357,256

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, property, plant and equipment included idle assets with a carrying value of approximately Ps.668,068 and Ps.842,992, respectively, resulting from the temporary shut-down of the productive operations of various plants in Mexico, the United States and Venezuela, mainly in the corn flour division in Mexico and packaged tortilla division in the United States.

For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized impairment losses on fixed assets by Ps.16,930 and Ps.4,014, respectively, within “Other expenses”.

The impairment loss recognized in 2013 for Ps.16,930 referred to the subsidiary Transporte Aéreo Técnico Ejecutivo, S.A. de C.V., which is part of “other segments” (see next paragraph). The impairment loss in 2012 amounting to Ps.4,014 referred to Gruma Seaham, Ltd, which is part of the segment “Corn flour and packaged tortilla division (United States and Europe)”. The impairment loss in Gruma Seaham, Ltd, reflects a decrease in the recoverable value of fixed assets of this CGU due to its continued operating losses.

On December 16, 2013, the Company entered into a purchase-sale contract with retention of title to sell an Eurocopter aircraft for a total of Ps.103,300. The sale price will be paid no later than 45 calendar days from the contract date. At December 31, 2013, the Company reclassified this item as “Assets held for sale” within current assets and the difference between its carrying value and its sale price was recognized in income as an impairment loss, as mentioned above.

The Company recognized equipment under finance lease arrangements that are described in Note 29-B.

14. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Changes in intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

	Intangible assets acquired														Internally
	Goodwill		Covenants not to compete			Patents and trademarks			Customer lists			Software for internal use			generated intangible assets and others			Total
At December 31, 2011
Cost	Ps.	2,614,587	Ps.	480,098		Ps.	147,577		Ps.	158,516		Ps.	640,799		Ps.	77,166		Ps.	4,118,743
Accumulated amortization	—		(354,289		)	(83,869		)	(63,439		)	(607,171		)	(55,616		)	(1,164,384		)
Net book value	Ps.	2,614,587	Ps.	125,809		Ps.	63,708		Ps.	95,077		Ps.	33,628		Ps.	21,550		Ps.	2,954,359

F-44

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

	Intangible assets acquired															Internally
	Goodwill			Covenants not to compete			Patents and trademarks			Customer lists			Software for internal use			generated intangible assets and others			Total
For the year ended December 31, 2012
Opening net book value	Ps.	2,614,587		Ps.	125,809		Ps.	63,708		Ps.	95,077		Ps.	33,628		Ps.	21,550		Ps.	2,954,359
Exchange differences	(118,552		)	(1,071		)	(4,122		)	1,170			(168		)	(3,241		)	(125,984		)
Additions	9,804			—			23			—			2,151			2,938			14,916
Disposals	—			—			—			—			(495		)	(6,091		)	(6,586		)
Amortization charge from continuing operations	—			(31,979		)	(10,554		)	(12,211		)	(1,585		)	(6,945		)	(63,274		)
Discontinued operations	—			—			—			—			2,013			—			2,013
Closing net book value	Ps.	2,505,839		Ps.	92,759		Ps.	49,055		Ps.	84,036		Ps.	35,544		Ps.	8,211		Ps.	2,775,444
At December 31, 2012
Cost	Ps.	2,505,839		Ps.	478,820		Ps.	137,370		Ps.	146,260		Ps.	667,243		Ps.	72,134		Ps.	4,007,666
Accumulated amortization	—			(386,061		)	(88,315		)	(62,224		)	(631,699		)	(63,923		)	(1,232,222		)
Net book value	Ps.	2,505,839		Ps.	92,759		Ps.	49,055		Ps.	84,036		Ps.	35,544		Ps.	8,211		Ps.	2,775,444
For the year ended December 31, 2013
Opening net book value	Ps.	2,505,839		Ps.	92,759		Ps.	49,055		Ps.	84,036		Ps.	35,544		Ps.	8,211		Ps.	2,775,444
Exchange differences	(33,147		)	(26		)	148			(575		)	(37		)	5,936			(27,701		)
Additions	—			—			—			—			809			2,592			3,401
Disposals	—			—			(3		)	—			(69		)	(838		)	(910		)
Amortization charge from continuing operations	—			(47,252		)	(9,315		)	(8,817		)	(1,529		)	(4,291		)	(71,204		)
Impairment	—			—			(761		)	(27,544		)	—			—			(28,305		)
Discontinued operations	—			—			—			—			(19,611		)	(13		)	(19,624		)
Closing net book value	Ps.	2,472,692		Ps.	45,481		Ps.	39,124		Ps.	47,100		Ps.	15,107		Ps.	11,597		Ps.	2,631,101
At December 31, 2013
Cost	Ps.	2,472,692		Ps.	465,125		Ps.	135,508		Ps.	71,657		Ps.	417,002		Ps.	23,980		Ps.	3,585,964
Accumulated amortization	—			(419,644		)	(96,384		)	(24,557		)	(401,895		)	(12,383		)	(954,863		)
Net book value	Ps.	2,472,692		Ps.	45,481		Ps.	39,124		Ps.	47,100		Ps.	15,107		Ps.	11,597		Ps.	2,631,101

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, except for goodwill, the Company does not have indefinite-lived intangible assets.

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, amortization expense of intangible assets from continuing operations amounted to Ps.71,204, Ps.63,274 and Ps.52,323, respectively, which were recognized in the income statement as selling and administrative expenses.

For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recognized an impairment loss of intangible assets amounting Ps.28,305, within “Other expenses”. The impairment loss recognized in 2013 referred to “other segments” and was originated by a decrease of the asset’s ability to generate future economic benefits.

Research and development costs of Ps.144,563, Ps.136,826 and Ps.91,011 that did not qualify for capitalization were recognized in the income statement for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

F-45

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

Goodwill acquired in business combinations is allocated at acquisition date to the cash-generating units (CGU) that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the business combinations. The carrying values of goodwill allocated to the CGU or a group of CGU are as follows:

Cash-generating unit	At December 31, 2013		At December 31, 2012
Mission Foods Division (1)	Ps.	802,845	Ps.	798,768
Gruma Seaham Ltd (2)	338,596		322,660
Gruma Corporation	212,765		212,765
Rositas Investments Pty, Ltd (2)	171,748		199,062
Semolina, A.S (2)	153,084		182,366
Gruma Holding Netherlands B.V (1)	123,507		122,451
Agroindustrias Integradas del Norte, S.A. de C.V (3)	115,099		115,099
Altera LLC (2)	95,755		95,617
Grupo Industrial Maseca, S.A.B. de C.V	98,622		98,622
NDF Azteca Milling Europe SRL (2)	93,317		86,757
Azteca Milling, L.P (1)	71,228		70,866
Solntse Mexico (2)	64,819		69,499
Gruma Centroamérica (2)	51,207		51,207
Molinos Azteca de Chiapas, S.A. de C.V (3)	28,158		28,158
Harinera de Yucatán, S.A. de C.V (3)	18,886		18,886
Harinera de Maíz de Mexicali, S.A. de C.V (3)	17,424		17,424
Molinos Azteca, S.A. de C.V (3)	8,926		8,926
Harinera de Maíz de Jalisco, S.A. de C.V (3)	6,706		6,706
	Ps.	2,472,692	Ps.	2,505,839

(1) Subsidiary of Gruma Corporation

(2) Subsidiary of Gruma International Foods, S.L.

(3) Subsidiary of Grupo Industrial Maseca, S.A.B. de C.V.

In 2013 and 2012, the discount rates and growth rates in perpetuity used by the Company for determining the discounted cash flows of the CGU with the main balances of goodwill are the following:

	After-tax discount rates				Growth rates
Cash-generating unit	2013		2012		2013		2012
Mission Foods Division	6.4	%	6.0	%	2.5	%	2.5	%
Gruma Seaham	8.5	%	7.7	%	2.5	%	2.5	%
Gruma Corporation	6.4	%	6.0	%	2.5	%	2.5	%
Rositas Investment PTY, LTD	7.7	%	7.9	%	3.0	%	3.0	%
Gruma Holding Netherlands B.V	8.4	%	8.6	%	1.9	%	1.9	%
Agroindustrias Integradas del Norte, S.A. de C.V	9.0	%	7.8	%	2.5	%	2.5	%
Semolina A.S	10.6	%	8.5	%	2.5	%	2.5	%

The discount rate used reflects the Company’s specific risks related to its operations. The long-term growth rate used is consistent with projections included in industry reports.

With respect to the determination of the CGU’s value in use, the Company’s management considered that a reasonably possible change in the key assumptions used, will not cause that the CGU’s carrying value to materially exceed their value in use. The recovery amount of cash-generating units has been

F-46

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

determined based on calculations of the values in use. These calculations use cash flow projections based on financial budgets approved by the Company’s management for a 5-year period.

For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, no impairment losses on goodwill were recognized. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company recognized impairment losses on goodwill by Ps.92,893, within “Other expenses”. The impairment loss recognized in 2011 referred to the CGU of Gruma Holding Netherlands B.V. and Gruma Seaham Ltd., which are part of the segment “Corn flour and packaged tortilla division (United States and Europe)”. This impairment loss reflected a decrease in the recoverable value of these CGU due to its continuous operating losses.

15. DEFERRED TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

A) COMPONENTS OF DEFERRED TAX

The analysis of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities is as follows:

	At December 31, 2013			At December 31, 2012
Deferred tax asset:
To be recovered after more than 12 months	Ps.	(280,424	)	Ps.	(314,866	)
To be recovered within 12 months	(7,244		)	(334,329		)
	(287,668		)	(649,195		)
Deferred tax liability:
To be settled after more than 12 months	1,964,789			4,225,367
To be settled within 12 months	81,329			—
	2,046,118			4,225,367
Deferred tax liability, net	Ps.	1,758,450		Ps.	3,576,172

The principal components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are summarized as follows:

	(Asset) Liability
	At December 31, 2013			At December 31, 2012
Net operating loss carryforwards and other tax credits	Ps.	(322,530	)	Ps.	(686,260	)
Customer advances	(3,884		)	(3,722		)
Allowance for doubtful accounts	(17,858		)	(4,637		)
Provisions	(516,933		)	(799,140		)
Deferred income for trademarks license with subsidiary	(703,269		)	—
Other	(115,040		)	(102,387		)
Deferred tax asset	(1,679,514		)	(1,596,146		)
Property, plant and equipment, net	1,758,421			2,075,116
Prepaid expenses	3,376			3,782
Inventories	15,133			38,458
Intangible assets and others	352,573			322,962
Investment in associates	403,384			407,958
Derivative financial instruments	(30,377		)	125,938
Other	24,836			8,792
	2,527,346			2,983,006
Tax consolidation effect	910,618			2,189,312
Deferred tax liability	3,437,964			5,172,318
Net provision for deferred taxes	Ps.	1,758,450		Ps.	3,576,172

F-47

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company did not recognize a deferred income tax asset of Ps.1,817,029 and Ps.3,328,993, respectively, for tax loss carryforwards, since sufficient evidence was not available to determine that these tax loss carryforwards will be realized during their amortization period. These tax losses expire in the year 2023. During 2013, the Company amortized tax losses of Ps.1,648,249 for which a deferred income tax asset was not previously recognized.

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, undistributed taxable income of subsidiaries amounted to Ps.2,462,656 and Ps.2,994,611, respectively. No deferred income tax has been recognized for this concept, since the Company has the ability to control the time for its reversal and it is probable that in the foreseeable future these temporary differences will not reverse.

The changes in the temporary differences during the year were as follows:

	Balance at January 1, 2013				Recognized in income			Recognized in other comprehensive income			Reclassifications			Discontinued operations			Foreign currency translation			Balance at December 31, 2013
Net operating loss carryforwards and other tax credits	Ps.		(686,260	)	Ps.	334,919		Ps.	—		Ps.	—		Ps.	—		Ps.	28,811		Ps.		(322,530	)
Customer advances	(3,722			)	(162		)	—			—			—			—			(3,884			)
Allowance for doubtful accounts	(4,637			)	(13,177		)	—			(71		)	—			27			(17,858			)
Provisions	(799,140			)	80,962			(42,298		)	7,335			235,595			613			(516,933			)
Deferred income from trademark license with subsidiary	—				(703,269		)	—			—			—			—			(703,269			)
Others	(102,387			)	(12,402		)	—			45						(296		)	(115,040			)
Deferred tax asset	(1,596,146			)	(313,129		)	(42,298		)	7,309			235,595			29,155			(1,679,514			)
Property, plant and equipment	2,075,116				(167,014		)	—			(280		)	(156,541		)	7,140			1,758,421
Prepaid expenses	3,782				(406		)	—			—			—			—			3,376
Inventories	38,458				(15,461		)	—			—			(7,864		)	—			15,133
Intangible assets and others	322,962				28,147			—			—			—			1,464			352,573
Investment in associates	407,958				(6,821		)	—			—			—			2,247			403,384
Derivative financial instruments	125,938				—			(156,936		)	—			—			621			(30,377			)
Others	8,792				8,870			14,391			(1,343		)	—			(5,874		)	24,836
	2,983,006				(152,685		)	(142,545		)	(1,623		)	(164,405		)	5,598			2,527,346
Tax consolidation effect	2,189,312				(1,278,694		)	—			—			—			—			910,618
Deferred tax liability	5,172,318				(1,431,379		)	(142,545		)	(1,623		)	(164,405		)	5,598			3,437,964
Net provision for deferred taxes	Ps.	3,576,172			Ps.	(1,744,508	)	Ps.	(184,843	)	Ps.	5,686		Ps.	71,190		Ps.	34,753		Ps.	1,758,450

F-48

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

	Balance at January 1, 2012			Recognized in income			Recognized in other comprehensive income			Reclassifications			Discontinued operations			Foreign currency translation			Balance at December 31, 2012
Net operating loss carryforwards and other tax credits	Ps.	(326,954	)	Ps.	(371,818	)	Ps.	—		Ps.	—		Ps.	—		Ps.	12,512		Ps.	(686,260	)
Customer advances	(163		)	(3,559		)	—			—			—			—			(3,722		)
Allowance for doubtful accounts	(14,791		)	11,810			—			(35		)	—			(1,621		)	(4,637		)
Provisions	(672,821		)	82,933			(9,567		)	—			(17,001		)	(182,684		)	(799,140		)
Recoverable asset tax	(11,023		)	11,023			—			—			—			—			—
Others	(133,411		)	25,955			—			(160		)	—			5,229			(102,387		)
Deferred tax asset	(1,159,163		)	(243,656		)	(9,567		)	(195		)	(17,001		)	(166,564		)	(1,596,146		)
Property, plant and equipment	2,060,121			(74,485		)	(1,217		)	(930		)	22,991			68,636			2,075,116
Prepaid expenses	4,999			(1,217		)	—			—			—			—			3,782
Inventories	63,104			(24,486		)	—			—			75			(235		)	38,458
Intangible assets and others	277,414			67,077			—			312			—			(21,841		)	322,962
Investment in associates	494,137			25,097			—			(77,930		)	—			(33,346		)	407,958
Derivative financial instruments	—			—			125,938			—			—			—			125,938
Others	86,682			54,209			14,702			(431		)	—			(146,370		)	8,792
	2,986,457			46,195			139,423			(78,979		)	23,066			(133,156		)	2,983,006
Tax consolidation effect	1,696,886			492,426			—			—			—			—			2,189,312
Deferred tax liability	4,683,343			538,621			139,423			(78,979		)	23,066			(133,156		)	5,172,318
Net provision for deferred taxes	Ps.	3,524,180		Ps.	294,965		Ps.	129,856		Ps.	(79,174	)	Ps.	6,065		Ps.	(299,720	)	Ps.	3,576,172

B) TAX LOSS CARRYFORWARDS

At December 31, 2013, the Company had tax loss carryforwards which amounted to approximately Ps.6,307,263. Based on projections prepared by the Company’s management of expected future taxable income, it has been determined that only tax losses for an amount of Ps.250,501 will be used. Therefore, the Company did not recognize a deferred tax asset for the difference. Tax losses that will be used have the following expiration dates:

Year	Amount
2014	Ps.	5,647
2015	104,751
2016	4,830
2017	4,239
2018 to 2023	131,034
Total	Ps.	250,501

C) UNCERTAIN TAX POSITIONS

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized a liability for uncertain tax positions of Ps.41,421 and Ps.38,688, respectively, excluding interest and penalties, and it is included in Other non-current liabilities. The following table shows a reconciliation of the Company’s uncertain tax positions, excluding interest and penalties:

	2013			2012
Uncertain tax positions at beginning of year	Ps.	38,688		Ps.	42,816
Translation adjustment of the beginning balance	(1,758		)	(1,552		)
Increase as result of uncertain tax positions taken in the year	6,538			5,217
Reductions due to a lapse of the statute of limitations	(2,047		)	(7,793		)
Uncertain tax positions at end of year	Ps.	41,421		Ps.	38,688

F-49

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

It is expected that the amount of uncertain tax positions will change in the next 12 months; however, the Company does not expect the change to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations. The Company had accrued interest and penalties of approximately Ps.3,609 and Ps.3,305 related to uncertain tax positions for 2013 and 2012, respectively.

D) TAX EFFECTS FROM OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Deferred taxes related to other comprehensive income are comprised of:

	At December 31, 2013			At December 31, 2012			At December 31, 2011
Foreign currency translation adjustments	Ps.	14,391		Ps.	14,701		Ps.	(8,583	)
Remeasurement of employment benefit obligations	(42,298		)	(10,783		)	(11,725		)
Cash flow hedges	(156,936		)	125,938			—
Other movements	—			—			(678		)
Total	Ps.	(184,843	)	Ps.	129,856		Ps.	(20,986	)

E) TAX CONSOLIDATION

Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. is authorized to determine income tax under the tax consolidation regime, together with its subsidiaries in Mexico, according to the authorization of Ministry of Finance and Public Credit on July 14, 1986, under what is stated in the applicable Law.

During 2013 and 2012, the Company determined a consolidated tax profit of Ps.7,855,228 and Ps.1,575,525, respectively. The consolidated tax result differs from the accounting result, mainly in such items taxed and deducted during different timing for accounting and tax purposes, from the recognition of the inflation effects for tax purposes, as well as such items only affecting either the consolidated accounting or taxable income.

The Company, together with its Mexican subsidiaries, determined income tax on a consolidated basis until 2013. The tax consolidation regime ceased due to the abrogation of the Income Tax Law effective until December 31, 2013; therefore, the Company has the obligation to pay the deferred tax determined at that time during the following five-year period starting in 2014, as shown below.

At the date of issuance of these financial statements, the Company concluded not to join the new Optional Regime for Company Groups for the year 2014 .

In accordance with subsection d) of section XV of the transitional Article 9 of the 2014 Income Tax Law, and since the Company was the parent entity at December 31, 2013 and at such date was subject to the payment schedule contained in the section VI of Article 4 of the transitional provisions of the Income Tax Law published in the Official Gazette on December 7, 2009, or Article 70-A of the 2013 Income Tax Law that was abrogated, the Company shall continue to settle its deferred income tax from tax consolidation pertaining to 2007 and previous years, under the provisions above mentioned, until its payment is completed.

Income tax resulting from the deconsolidation must be paid to the tax authorities in accordance with the following deadlines:

F-50

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

1.25% no later than May 31, 2014.

2.25% no later than April 30, 2015.

3.20% no later than April 30, 2016.

4.15% no later than April 30, 2017.

5.15% no later than April 30, 2018.

The corresponding taxes (except the 25% to be paid in 2014), must be restated with inflation factors.

At December 31, 2013, the liability arising from the aforementioned changes in the Income Tax Law amounted to Ps.1,258,238 and is estimated to be incurred as follows:

	Year of payment
	2014		2015		2016		2017		2018 and thereafter		Total
Tax losses	Ps.	347,620	Ps.	312,910	Ps.	244,733	Ps.	179,525	Ps.	173,450	Ps.	1,258,238

The Company, through time, has been recognizing a tax liability compensated with income tax from tax loss carryforwards. At December 31, 2013, income tax payable with defined payment dates was classified in the statement of financial position as short and long-term income tax payable for Ps.347,620 and Ps.910,618, respectively. In addition, the remaining liability, for which a settlement date has not yet determined in accordance with the requirements of the Income Tax Law, was included as a component of the deferred income taxes.

16. DEBT

Debt is summarized as follows:

Short-term:

	At December 31, 2013		At December 31, 2012
Bank loans	Ps.	2,612,997	Ps.	7,929,276
Current portion of long-term bank loans	659,129		69,414
Current portion of financing lease liabilities	3,771		20,073
	Ps.	3,275,897	Ps.	8,018,763

Long-term:

	At December 31, 2013			At December 31, 2012
Bank loans	Ps.	10,011,831		Ps.	8,207,700
Perpetual notes	3,732,717			3,695,579
Financing lease liabilities	14,795			38,916
	Ps.	13,759,343		Ps.	11,942,195
Current portion of long-term bank loans	(659,129		)	(69,414		)
Current portion of financing lease liabilities	(3,771		)	(20,073		)
	Ps.	13,096,443		Ps.	11,852,708

F-51

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

The terms, conditions and carrying values of debt are as follows:

	Currency	Interestrate	Maturity date	At December 31, 2013		At December 31, 2012
Perpetual notes	U.S.$	7.75%	(a)	Ps.	3,732,717	Ps.	3,695,579
Revolving credit	U.S.$	LIBOR + 1.375%	2016	1,038,800		2,119,580
Revolving credits	U.S.$	LIBOR + 1.75%	2016	—		1,626,264
Syndicated loan	U.S.$	LIBOR + 2%	2014-2018	2,855,248		—
Syndicated loan	Pesos	TIIE +2% (b)	2014-2018	2,284,283		—
Syndicated loan	Pesos	TIIE + 1.875%	2015-2018	1,193,683		1,193,080
Credit	U.S.$	LIBOR + 1.75%	2014-2016	1,951,575		1,936,138
Credit	Pesos	5.19%	2014	1,550,000		—
Credit	U.S.$	2.65% - 3.37%	2014	725,750		791,012
Credit	Pesos	TIIE + 1.875%	2015-2018	597,702		598,062
Credit	Pesos	6.39% - 8.57%	2016	88,082		84,794
Credit	Liras	5.0%	2014	75,717		133,925
Credit	U.S.$	LIBOR + 2%	2014	2,458		6,895
Credit	U.S.$	LIBOR + 1.75%	2016	—		642,887
Credit	Euros	1.8% - 2.2%	2013	—		32,327
Credit	U.S.$	4.8%	2013	—		9,273
Credit	U.S.$	LIBOR + 0.9935%	2014	261,530		—
Credits	U.S.$	LIBOR + 3%	2013	—		3,997,068
Credit	U.S.$	LIBOR + 3%	2013	—		1,292,671
Credits	Pesos	6.16% - 7.65%	2013	—		1,673,000
Financing lease liability	Euros	3.99%	2013-2017	14,795		17,977
Financing lease liability	Pesos	13.02%	2013-2014	—		20,939
Total				Ps.	16,372,340	Ps.	19,871,471

(a) Redeemable starting 2009 at the Company’s option.

(b) Interbank Equilibrium Interest Rate.

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, short-term debt bore interest at an average rate of 4.13% and 4.12%, respectively. At December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, interest expense included interest related to debt amounting Ps.1,015,458, Ps.782,487 and Ps.903,005, respectively.

At December 31, 2013, the annual maturities of long-term debt outstanding were as follows:

Year	Amount
2015	Ps.		962,785
2016	3,293,075
2017	1,586,525
2018	3,521,344
2019 and thereafter	3,732,714
Total	Ps.	13,096,443

To carry out the transaction of the Equity Interests, as mentioned in Note 3 “Acquisition of non-controlling interest of Archer-Daniels-Midland in Gruma and certain subsidiaries”, GRUMA obtained bridge loan facilities with maturity dates of up to a year for a total amount of Ps.5,103,360 (U.S.$400 million), lent by Goldman Sachs Bank USA, Banco Santander and Banco Inbursa (the “Short-Term Loan Facilities”), and used Ps.637,920 (U.S.$50 million) of Gruma Corporation’s revolving syndicated long term credit facility with Bank of America, which matures in 2016. For the execution of the Short-Term Loan Facilities, GRUMA’s permitted leverage ratios established under the loan facilities as of

F-52

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

December 31, 2012 were increased to allow GRUMA to increase its leverage as a result of the obtainment of the Short-Term Loan Facilities.

In order to refinance the Short-Term Loan Facilities, on June 10, 2013, the Company obtained a 5-year Syndicated Credit Facility for Ps.$2,300 million  with Inbursa, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero Inbursa, as administrative agent, with an average life of 4.2 years and amortizations starting on December 2014, at a rate of TIIE plus a spread between 162.5 and 262.5 basis points based on the Company’s leverage ratio. Banco Nacional de Comercio Exterior, S.N.C., Banca de Desarrollo and HSBC México, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero HSBC, also participated in this facility.

Likewise, on June 13, 2013, the Company obtained a 5-year Syndicated Credit Facility for U.S.$220 million with Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen Boerenleenbank B.A., “Rabobank Nederland”, New York Branch, as administrative agent, with an average life of 4.2 years and amortizations starting on December 2014, at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread between 150 and 300 basis points based on the Company’s leverage ratio. BBVA Bancomer, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero BBVA Bancomer and Bank of America, N.A., also participated in this facility.

The Company has credit line agreements for Ps.5,558 million (U.S.$425 million), from which Ps.4,511 million (U.S.$345 million) are available as of December 31, 2013. These credit line agreements require a quarterly payment of a commitment fee ranging from 0.2% to 1.2% over the unused amounts.

The outstanding credit agreements contain covenants mainly related to compliance with certain financial ratios and delivery of financial information, which, if not complied with during the period, as determined by creditors, may be considered a cause for early maturity of the debt.

Financial ratios are calculated according to formulas established in the credit agreements. The main financial ratios contained in the credit agreements are the following:

·Interest coverage ratio, defined as the ratio of consolidated earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) of the last twelve months to consolidated interest charges, should not be less than 2.50 to 1.00.

·Leverage ratio, defined as the ratio of total consolidated indebtedness (as described in the credit agreements) to consolidated EBITDA, should be as follows:

Period	Leverage ratio
From June 15, 2011 to December 7, 2012	No greater than 3.50 to 1.00
From December 8, 2012 to September 30, 2013	No greater than 4.75 to 1.00
From October 1, 2013 to September 30, 2014	No greater than 4.50 to 1.00
From October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2015	No greater than 4.00 to 1.00
From October 1, 2015 and thereafter	No greater than 3.50 to 1.00

At December 31, 2013, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenants, as well as with the delivery of the required financial information.

F-53

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

17. PROVISIONS

The movements of provisions are as follows:

	Labor provisions					Restoration provision					Tax provision				Unregulated labor security obligations					Subtotal
Balance at December 31, 2011	Ps.	316,561				Ps.	115,897				Ps.	16,618			Ps.			47,178		Ps.		496,254
Charge (credit) to income:
Additional provisions	15,821					32,558					5,660				—					54,039
Unused amounts reversed	(355				)	948					—				—					593
Used during the year	(71,420				)	(12,739				)	(50			)	—					(84,209				)
Exchange differences	(17,873				)	(8,005				)	(996			)	—					(26,874				)
Discontinued operations	(6,152				)	—					—				(46,108				)	(52,260				)
Balance at December 31, 2012	236,582					128,659					21,232				1,070					387,543
Charge (credit) to income:
Additional provisions	73,636					—					1,501				—					75,137
Unused amounts reversed	—					(5,800				)	—				—					(5,800				)
Used during the year	(45,989				)	—					—				—					(45,989				)
Exchange differences	1,715					623					214				—					2,552
Discontinued operations	(34,589				)	—					—				(1,070				)	(35,659				)
Balance at December 31, 2013	Ps.			231,355		Ps.		123,482			Ps.	22,947			Ps.		—			Ps.	377,784
Of which current	Ps.		53,980			Ps.			—		Ps.		—		Ps.	—				Ps.			53,980
Of which non-current	177,375					123,482					22,947				—					323,804

	Subtotal					Provision for operating plant closure expenditures					Other					Total
Balance at December 31, 2011	Ps.			496,254		Ps.		14,975			Ps.		4,601			Ps.			515,830
Charge (credit) to income:
Additional provisions	54,039					—					—					54,039
Unused amounts reversed	593					—					—					593
Used during the year	(84,209				)	—					—					(84,209				)
Exchange differences	(26,874				)	—					—					(26,874				)
Discontinued operations	(52,260				)	(14,975				)	(4,601				)	(52,260				)
Balance at December 31, 2012	387,543					—					—					387,543
Charge (credit) to income:
Additional provisions	75,137					—					—					75,137
Unused amounts reversed	(5,800				)	—					—					(5,800				)
Used during the year	(45,989				)	—					—					(45,989				)
Exchange differences	2,552					—					—					2,552
Discontinued operations	(35,659				)	—					—					(35,659				)
Balance at December 31, 2013	Ps.		377,784			Ps.			—		Ps.			—		Ps.		377,784
Of which current	Ps.	53,980				Ps.	—				Ps.	—				Ps.	53,980
Of which non-current	323,804					—					—					323,804

F-54

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

Labor provisions

In the United States, when permitted by law, the Company self insures against workers’ compensation claims.  As claims are filed for workers’ compensation, the Company recognizes an obligation to settle these claims. Certain actuarial information is used to estimate the expected outflows of economic resources and projected timing of the settlement of these claims. The discount rate applied during 2013 was 2.98%.

Likewise, the subsidiary in Italy esablished a provision to meet legal costs arising from labor claims related mainly to work accidents.

Subsidiaries in Venezuela established a provision for labor claims filed against the Company related to work accidents and the payment of certain labor benefits, and to meet the terms of the collective labor contracts that, as of the date hereof, are still being negotiated with workers’ unions.

Restoration provision

In the United States and Europe, the Company has recognized an obligation to remove equipment and leasehold improvements from certain of its leased manufacturing facilities in order to restore the facilities to their original condition, less normal wear and tear as determined by the terms of the lease. The Company has estimated the expected outflows of economic resources associated with these obligations and the probability of possible settlement dates based upon the terms of the lease. These estimates are used to calculate the present value of the estimated expenditures using a pre-tax discount rate and taking into account any specific risks associated with these obligations. The discount rate applied during 2013 was 4.11%.

Tax provision

In Central America, for the periods from 2005 to 2011, tax authorities have lodged tax assessments against the Company for an amount of Ps.25 million (971 million colons) in connection with sales and income tax. Based on the criteria of the Company’s management and the opinion of tax consultants hired for the Company´s defense, there is a probability that more than 50% of the tax assessments will be settled. For this reason, the Company has accrued the necessary amounts to cover the payment of these obligations.

Unregulated labor security obligations

In Venezuela, the Organic Law of Prevention, Conditions and Work Environment (Ley Orgánica de Prevención, Condiciones y Medio Ambiente de Trabajo) establishes the substitution of certain security obligations for other more onerous. This regulation has not been officially released by the Venezuelan government, making it difficult to determine the payment date for this obligation.

Provision for operating plant closure expenditures

This provision was created to cover all expenses related to the closure of a production plant in Venezuela which was surrendered to a government institution due to the expiration of the lease contract, and to cover any damage to the assets to be returned.

F-55

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

18. OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, Other current liabilities include employee benefits payable of Ps.590,722 and Ps.1,024,372, respectively. The rest of the items that comprise Other current liabilities correspond to accrued expenses payable.

19. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBLIGATIONS

Employee benefits obligations recognized in the balance sheet, by country, were as follows:

Country	At December 31, 2013			At December 31, 2012
Mexico	Ps.		523,427	Ps.		407,781
United States and Europe	96,871			85,819
Central America	8,745			—
Venezuela	—			90,164
Total	Ps.	629,043		Ps.	583,764

A) MEXICO

In Mexico, labor obligations recognized by the Company correspond to the single-payment retirement plan and seniority premium. The benefits for the retirement plan and seniority premium are defined benefit plans, based on the projected salary at the date in which the employee is assumed to receive the benefits. Currently, the plan operates under Mexican law, which does not require minimum funding.

The plans in Mexico typically expose the Company to actuarial risks such as: investment risk, interest rate risk, longevity risk and salary risk:

·Investment risk. The expected return rate for investment funds is equivalent to the discount rate, which is calculated using a discount rate determined by reference to long-term government bonds; if the return on plan asset is below this rate, it will create a plan deficit. Currently the plan has a relatively balanced investment in equity securities and fixed-rate instruments. Due to the long-term nature of the plan liabilities, the Company considers appropriate that a reasonable portion of the plan assets should be invested in equity securities to leverage the return generated by the fund; however, a minimum 30% must be invested in government bonds as required by Mexican tax laws.

·Interest risk. A decrease in the interest rate will increase the plan liability; the volatility in interest rates depends exclusively in the economic environment.

·Longevity risk. The present value of the defined benefit plan liability is calculated by reference to the best estimate of mortality of plan participants. An increase in the life expectancy of the plan participants will increase the plan’s liability.

·Salary risk. The present value of the defined benefit plan liability is calculated by reference to the future salaries of plan participants. As such, an increase in the salary expectancy of the plan participants will increase the plan’s liability.

F-56

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

The reconciliation between the beginning and ending balances of the present value of the defined benefit obligations (DBO) is as follows:

	2013			2012
DBO at beginning of the year	Ps.	456,691		Ps.	314,649
Add (deduct):
Current service cost		16,032			19,907
Financial cost		21,852			22,296
Remeasurement for the period		167,985			111,890
Acquisition/disposal or excision of business		—			52
Benefits paid		(84,445	)		(12,103	)
Past service cost		1,552			—
DBO at end of the year	Ps.	579,667		Ps.	456,691

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, liabilities relating to vested employee benefits amounted to Ps.391,860 and Ps.260,193, respectively.

The reconciliation between the beginning and ending balances of the employee benefit plan assets at fair value for the years 2013 and 2012 is shown below:

	2013		2012
Plan assets at fair value at beginning of the year	Ps.	48,910	Ps.	38,850
Add (deduct):
Return on plan assets		2,494		4,085
Return on plan assets (excluding amounts included in net interest expense)		4,836		5,975
Plan assets at fair value at end of the year	Ps.	56,240	Ps.	48,910

The following table shows the reconciliation between the present value of the defined benefit obligation and the plan assets at fair value, and the projected net liability included in the balance sheet:

	At December 31, 2013			At December 31, 2012
Employee benefit (assets) liabilities:
DBO	Ps.	579,667		Ps.	456,691
Plan assets		(56,240	)		(48,910	)
Employee benefits obligations	Ps.	523,427		Ps.	407,781

The value of the DBO related to the pension plan amounted to Ps.507,826 and Ps.388,988 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, while the value of the DBO related to seniority premiums amounted to Ps.71,841 and Ps.67,703, respectively.

At December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the components of net cost comprised the following:

	2013			2012			2011
Current service cost	Ps.	16,032		Ps.	19,907		Ps.	17,496
Past service cost		1,552			—			—
Financial cost		21,852			22,296			20,964
Return on plan assets		(2,494	)		(4,085	)		(4,447	)
Net cost for the year	Ps.	36,942		Ps.	38,118		Ps.	34,013

F-57

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

The net cost for the year 2013, 2012 and 2011 of Ps.36,942, Ps.38,118 and Ps.34,013, respectively, was recognized as follows:

	2013		2012		2011
Cost of sales	Ps.	11,934	Ps.	5,104	Ps.	2,138
Selling and administrative expenses		25,008		33,014		31,875
Net cost for the year	Ps.	36,942	Ps.	38,118	Ps.	34,013

Remeasurements of the defined benefit obligation recognized in other comprehensive income are comprised of:

	2013			2012			2011
Return on plan assets (excluding amounts included in net interest expense)	Ps.	(4,836	)	Ps.	(5,975	)	Ps.	4,631
Actuarial gains and losses arising from changes in financial assumptions		(19,366	)		67,269			(7,665	)
Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments		187,351			44,621			698
Acquisition/disposal or excision of business		—			52			—
	Ps.	163,149		Ps.	105,967		Ps.	(2,336	)

The total amount recognized in other comprehensive income is described below:

	2013		2012
Balance at the beginning of the year	Ps.	110,885	Ps.	4,888
Remeasurements that occurred during the year	163,149		105,967
Balance at the end of the year	Ps.	274,004	Ps.	110,855

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, plan assets stated at fair value and related percentages with respect to total plan assets were analyzed as follows:

	At December 31, 2013				At December 31, 2012
Equity securities, classified by type of industry:	Ps.	42,180	75	%	Ps.	33,748	69	%
Consumer industry	7,907				6,193
Financial institutions	34,273				27,555
Fixed rate securities	14,060		25	%	15,162		31	%
Fair value of plan assets	Ps.	56,240	100	%	Ps.	48,910	100	%

The Company has a policy of maintaining at least 30% of its trust assets in Mexican Federal Government instruments. Guidelines have been established for the remaining 70% and investment decisions are taken in accordance with these guidelines to the extent market conditions and available funds allow it.

F-58

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

As of December 31, 2013, the funds maintained in plan assets were considered sufficient to face the Company’s short-term needs; therefore, the Company’s management has determined that for the time being there is no need for additional contributions to increase these assets.

The main actuarial assumptions used were as follows:

	At December 31, 2013		At December 31, 2012
Discount rate	5.75	%	5.25	%
Future increase rate in compensation levels	4.50	%	4.50	%
Long-term inflation rate	3.50	%	3.50	%

At December 31 2013 and 2012, the impact in DBO for a decrease of 25 basis points in the discount rate amounts to Ps.9,470 and Ps.7,455, respectively.

The sensitivity analysis mentioned above is based on the change in the discount rate while keeping constant the rest of the assumptions. In practice, this is unlikely to occur, and changes in some of the assumptions can be correlated.

The methods and assumptions used in preparing the sensitivity analysis did not change from those used in prior years.

The average duration of the benefit obligation at December 31, 2013 and 2012 is 14 and 15 years, respectively.

The Company does not expect to contribute during the next fiscal year.

B) OTHER COUNTRIES

In the United States, the Company has a savings and investment plan that incorporates voluntary employee 401(k) contributions with matching contributions from the Company in this country. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, total expenses related to this plan amounted to Ps.68,658, Ps.62,340 and Ps.54,004, respectively (U.S.$5,351, U.S.$4,737 and U.S.$4,331 thousand, respectively).

Additionally, the Company has established an unfunded nonqualified deferred compensation plan for a selected group of management and highly compensated employees. The plan is voluntary and allows employees to defer a portion of their salary or bonus in excess of the savings and investment plan limitations. The employees elect investment options and the Company monitors the result of those investments and records a liability for the obligation. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, total expenses related to this plan were approximately Ps.2,515, Ps.6,014 and Ps.1,334, respectively (U.S.$196, U.S.$457 and U.S.$106 thousand, respectively). At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the liability recognized for these items amounted to Ps.87,469 and Ps.77,410, respectively (U.S.$6,689 and U.S.$5,950 thousand, respectively).

In Central America, in its subsidiary in Ecuador, as stated by law, the Company records a retirement liability according to the Labor Code, Article 216 - Retirement, which states that “workers that have rendered services twenty five years or more, continuously or interruptedly, are entitled to be retired by their employers”. At December 31, 2013, the liability recognized for this item amounted to Ps.8,745 and the total labor obligation cost amounted Ps.1,843.

F-59

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

In Venezuela, as of December 31, 2012, the liability recognized for these items amounted to Ps.90,164. At December 31, 2012, labor obligations cost amounted to Ps.69,314, respectively. The main long-term nominal actuarial assumptions used were as follows:

	At December 31, 2012
Discount rate	23	%
Future increase rate in compensation levels	25	%
Long-term inflation rate	20	%

At December 31, 2012, a hypothetical 1% decrease in the discount rate would increase the value of the projected benefits obligation by approximately Ps.5,637.

20. EQUITY

A)  COMMON STOCK

At December 31, 2013, the Company’s outstanding common stock consisted of 432,749,079 Series “B” shares, with no par value, fully subscribed and paid, which can only be withdrawn with stockholders’ approval (457,315,640 shares fully subscribed and paid and 107,858,969 shares held in Treasury at December 31, 2012).

The Extraordinary Stockholders’ Meeting held on May 15, 2013 agreed on the merger by incorporation of Valores Azteca, S.A. de C.V. as merged company that is extinguished, with GRUMA as merging company. In accordance with this merger, GRUMA as owner of 45% of the capital stock of Valores Azteca, received 24,566,561 ordinary shares, with no par value, Series B, Class I, of GRUMA. The effect in the Company’s equity as a result of this merger was $1,010 million Mexican pesos.

Additionally, the following shares of GRUMA were approved to be cancelled:

Amount of shares cancelled	Description
1,523,900 shares	Shares held in Treasury, repurchased by GRUMA
106,335,069 shares	Shares held in Treasury, acquired by GRUMA from ADM in December 2012 (Note 3)
24,566,561 shares	Shares received by GRUMA, due to the merger of Valores Azteca with GRUMA (Note 12)

B)  RETAINED EARNINGS

In accordance with Mexican Corporate Law, the legal reserve must be increased annually by 5% of annual net profits until it reaches a fifth of the fully paid common stock amount. The legal reserve is included within retained earnings.

Movements in the legal reserve for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:

	Amount
Balance at December 31, 2011	Ps.	103,542
Increases during the year	201,089
Balance at December 31, 2012	304,631
Increases during the year	—
Balance at December 31, 2013	Ps.	304,631

F-60

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

In October 2013, the Chamber of Senators and Deputies approved the issuance of the new Income Tax Law, effective starting January 1, 2014. Among other, the Law establishes a 10% tax rate on earnings from 2014 and thereafter, for dividend paid to foreign residents and Mexican individuals; additionally, this law states that for the years 2001 to 2013, the net taxable income will be determined in accordance with the Income Tax Law that was effective for each year.

Dividends paid are not subject to income tax if paid from the Net Tax Profit Account (CUFIN) and will be taxed at a rate that fluctuates between 32% and 35% if they are paid from the reinvested Net Tax Profit Account. Dividends paid that exceed CUFIN and reinvested CUFIN are subject to an income tax payable at a rate of 30% if paid in 2014. The tax is payable by the Company and may be credited against the normal income tax payable by the Company in the year in which the dividends are paid or in the following two years. Dividends paid from earnings previously taxed are not subject to any withholding or additional tax payment.

C)  PURCHASE OF COMMON STOCK

The Shareholders’ Meeting held on April 26, 2013 approved to increase the reserve to repurchase the Company’s own shares up to Ps.650,000, while the Shareholders’ Meeting held on December 13, 2012 approved to increase the reserve to repurchase the Company’s own shares up to Ps.4,500,000. The maximum amount of proceeds that can be used to purchase the Company’s own shares cannot exceed, in any case, the net earnings of the entity, including retained earnings. The difference between the acquisition cost of the repurchased shares and their stated value, composed of common stock and share premium, is recognized as part of the reserve to repurchase the Company’s own shares, which is included within retained earnings from prior years. The gain or loss on the sale of the Company’s own shares is recorded in retained earnings.

Movements in the reserve for acquisition of Company’s own shares for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:

	Amount
Balance at December 31, 2011	Ps.	628,736
Increase in reserve for repurchase of Company’s own shares approved by the Stockholders’ Meeting in December 13, 2012	3,850,000
Acquisition of Strategic Partner’s shares (Note 3)	(4,011,348		)
Balance at December 31, 2012	Ps.	467,388
Increase in reserve for repurchase of Company’s own shares approved by the Stockholders’ Meeting in April 26, 2013	650,000
Cancellation of repurchased shares	(467,388		)
Balance at December 31, 2013	Ps.	650,000

F-61

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

D) FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION ADJUSTMENTS

Foreign currency translation adjustments consisted of the following as of December 31:

	2013			2012
Balance at beginning of year	Ps.	(64,081	)	Ps.	(76,972	)
Effect of the year from translating net investment in foreign subsidiaries	(217,535		)	(455,490		)
Reclassification adjustment for foreign currency translation from discontinued operations (1)	317,133			—
Exchange differences arising from foreign currency liabilities accounted for as a hedge of the Company’s net investments in foreign subsidiaries	(46,412		)	468,381
Balance at end of year	Ps.	(10,895	)	Ps.	(64,081	)

(1)Corresponds to the shareholders’ portion of the foreign currency translation effect. The non-controlling portion of the foreign currency translation effect at December 31, 2013 amounts to Ps.115,325.

The investment that the Company maintains in its operations in the United States and Europe generated a hedge of up to U.S.$651 and U.S.$532 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the accumulated effect of translating net investment in foreign subsidiaries impacted non-controlling interest in the amounts of Ps.(8,769) and Ps.(130,286), respectively.

21. SUBSIDIARIES

The table below shows details of non-wholly subsidiaries of the Company that have material non-controlling interests:

	Country of incorporation and	% of non-controlling interest				Income allocated to non-controlling interest
Name of subsidiary	business	31/Dec/2013		31/Dec/2012		31/Dec/2013		31/Dec/2012		31/Dec/2011
Grupo Industrial Maseca, S.A.B. de C.V.	Mexico	16.82	%	16.82	%	Ps.	301,328	Ps.	241,575	Ps.	257,202

	Accumulated non-controlling interest
Name of subsidiary	31/Dec/2013		31/Dec/2012
Grupo Industrial Maseca, S.A.B. de C.V.	Ps.	1,473,531	Ps.	1,767,752

Summarized financial information in respect of the Company’s subsidiary that has material non-controlling interests is set out below. The summarized financial information below represents amounts before inter-company eliminations.

F-62

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

Grupo Industrial Maseca, S.A.B. de C.V.

	At December 31, 2013		At December 31, 2012
Current assets	Ps.	4,440,185	Ps.	8,158,176
Non-current assets	7,141,225		4,635,296
Current liabilities	3,647,105		3,236,283
Non-current liabilities	624,718		572,552
Equity attributable to owners of the Company	5,836,056		7,216,885
Non-controlling interests	1,473,531		1,767,752
Dividends paid to non-controlling interests	594,024		96,187

	For the year ended December 31,
	2013			2012			2011
Net sales	Ps.	16,435,825		Ps.	17,573,450		Ps.	15,385,740
Net income	1,767,978			1,352,888			1,479,032
Comprehensive income	1,760,949			1,295,452			1,507,908
Cash flows:
Operating activities	Ps.	4,473,355		Ps.	842,946		Ps.	974,125
Investment activities	(2,792,669		)	(457,388		)	(200,919		)
Financing activities	(1,886,033		)	(351,475		)	(831,822		)

During 2013 the Company acquired the shares of a non-controlling interest for Ps.140,718. The Company has recorded an account payable of Ps.103,300 as of December 31, 2013.

22. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

A) FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS BY CATEGORY

The carrying values of financial instruments by category are presented below:

	At December 31, 2013
	Loans, receivables and liabilities at amortized cost		Financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss		Hedge derivatives		Assets available for sale		Totalcategories
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	Ps.	1,338,555	Ps.	—	Ps.	—	Ps.	—	Ps.	1,338,555
Derivative financial instruments	—		12,282		108,280		—		120,562
Accounts receivable	7,193,317		—		—		—		7,193,317
Investment in Venezuela available for sale	—		—		—		3,109,013		3,109,013
Long term notes receivable from sale of tortilla machines and other	154,458		—		—		—		154,458

F-63

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

	At December 31, 2013
	Loans, receivables and liabilities at amortized cost		Financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss		Hedge derivatives		Assets available for sale		Totalcategories
Financial liabilities:
Current debt	Ps.	3,275,897	Ps.	—	Ps.	—	Ps.	—	Ps.	3,275,897
Trade accounts payable	3,547,498		—		—		—		3,547,498
Derivative financial instruments	—		—		71,540		—		71,540
Long-term debt	13,096,443		—		—		—		13,096,443
Contingent payment due to repurchase of the Company’s own shares (Note 3)	—		671,069		—		—		671,069
Other liabilities (excludes non-financial liabilities)	51,924		—		—		—		51,924

	At December 31, 2012
	Loans, receivables and liabilities at amortized cost			Financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss			Hedge derivatives		Totalcategories
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	Ps.	1,287,368		Ps.	—		Ps.	—	Ps.	1,287,368
Derivative financial instruments	—			—			45,316		45,316
Accounts receivable	7,048,525			—			—		7,048,525
Non-current notes and accounts receivable	212,113			—			—		212,113
Financial liabilities:
Current debt	Ps.		8,018,763	Ps.		—	Ps.	—	Ps.		8,018,763
Trade accounts payable	6,307,796			—			—		6,307,796
Derivative financial instruments	—			28,832			—		28,832
Long-term debt	11,852,708			—			—		11,852,708
Contingent payment due to repurchase of the Company’s own shares (Note 3)	—			606,495			—		606,495
Other liabilities (excludes non-financial liabilities)	60,776			—			—		60,776

F-64

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

B) FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, trade accounts payable and other current liabilities approximate their fair value, due to their short maturity. In addition, the net book value of accounts receivable and recoverable taxes represent the expected cash flow to be received.

The estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments is as follows:

	At December 31, 2013
	Carrying amount		Fair value
Assets:
Derivative financial instruments — exchange rate (1)	Ps.	12,282	Ps.	12,282
Investment in Venezuela available for sale	3,109,013		3,109,013		(2)
Long-term notes receivable from sale of tortilla machines	144,142		127,182
Liabilities:
Perpetual bonds in U.S. dollars bearing fixed interest at an annual rate of 7.75%	3,732,717		3,967,083
Short and long-term debt	12,639,623		12,924,889
Contingent payment due to repurchase of the Company’s own shares	671,069		671,069
Derivative financial instruments - other raw materials	71,540		71,540

(1)At December 31, 2013, the balance of derivative financial instruments receivable amounted to Ps.120,562, and is comprised of Ps.12,282 corresponding to the gain from the valuation of open positions in exchange rate derivative financial instruments at the end of the year, and Ps.108,280 corresponding to revolving funds or margin calls that arise from price changes in the underlying asset that the Company maintains with the third party, to be applied against payments, related to corn derivatives.

(2)Following the applicable guidelines and considering that the range of reasonable fair-value estimates was significant and the probabilities of the various estimates within the range could not be reasonably assessed, the Company recognized this financial asset at its carrying value and not at its fair value. See Note 28.

	At December 31, 2012
	Carrying amount		Fair value
Assets:
Derivative financial instruments - corn (1)	Ps.	119,275	Ps.	119,275
Long-term notes receivable from sale of tortilla machines	199,925		172,951
Liabilities:
Perpetual bonds in U.S. dollars bearing fixed interest at an annual rate of 7.75%	3,695,579		3,942,060
Short and long-term debt	16,175,892		16,457,069
Contingent payment due to repurchase of the Company’s own shares	606,495		606,495
Derivative financial instruments - other raw materials	28,832		28,832

(1)At December 31, 2012, the balance of derivative financial instruments receivable amounted to Ps.45,316, and is comprised of Ps.119,275 corresponding to the gain from the valuation of open positions in corn derivatives at the end of the year, and Ps.73,959 corresponding to advances on

F-65

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

favorable positions that arise from price changes in the underlying asset that the Company maintains with the third party.

The fair values were determined by the Company as follows:

·The fair values of perpetual bonds were determined based on available market prices. Fair value of perpetual bonds is classified as level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.

·The fair value for the rest of the long-term debt was based on the present value of the cash flows discounted at interest rates based on readily observable market inputs. Fair value of long-term debt is classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The average discount rate used was 3.74%.

·Long-term notes receivable from sale of tortilla machines are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. Its fair value was based on the present value of future cash flows using a discount rate of 9.01%.

C) DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

At December 31, 2013 derivative financial instruments comprised the following:

		Fair value
Type of contract	Notional amount	Asset		Liability
Corn futures	6,365,000 Bushels			Ps.	71,540
Exchange rate forwards	$ 65,280,000 USD	Ps.	12,282

At December 31, 2013, open positions of corn derivatives were recorded at fair value. The result of the valuation of financial instruments that qualified as cash flow hedge represented a loss of Ps.71,540, which was recognized in comprehensive income within equity. At December 31, 2013, the Company had no open positions of financial instruments that did not qualify as hedge accounting.

Operations terminated at December 31, 2013 on corn and natural gas derivatives represented a loss of Ps.30,160 which was recognized in income as other expenses, net (Note 24).

Exchange rate derivative financial instruments were recorded at fair value. At December 31, 2013, the open positions of exchange rate derivatives represented a gain of Ps.12,282 which was recognized in income as comprehensive financing cost, net (Note 26). Likewise, for the year ended December 31, 2013, terminated operations of these instruments represented a gain of Ps.29,785, which was recognized in income as comprehensive financing cost, net.

At December 31, 2013, the Company had revolving funds denominated “margin calls” amounting Ps.108,280, which are required to be applied against payments, due to price changes in the underlying asset.

For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company reclassified the amount of Ps.207,241 from comprehensive income and recognized it as part of inventory. This amount refers to the gain from the terminated operations for corn hedges, in which the grain, subject to these hedges, was received. Additionally, the corn hedges terminated during the period and for which no corn has been received, originated a loss of Ps.62,009, which was recognized in comprehensive income.

F-66

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

At December 31, 2012 derivative financial instruments comprised the following:

		Fair value
Type of contract	Notional amount	Asset		Liability
Corn futures	6,695,000 bushels	Ps.	119,275
Natural gas swaps 2013	1,920,000 Mmbtu			Ps.	28,832

At December 31, 2012, open positions of corn and natural gas derivatives were recorded at fair value. The result of the valuation of financial instruments that qualified as cash flow hedge represented a gain of Ps.119,275, which was recognized in comprehensive income within equity. Open positions of financial instruments that did not qualify as hedge accounting represented a gain of Ps.17,090 which was recognized in income as other expenses, net (Note 24).

Operations terminated at December 31, 2012 on corn and natural gas derivatives represented a gain of Ps.21,058 which was recognized in income as other expenses, net (Note 24).

Exchange rate derivative financial instruments were recorded at fair value. At December 31, 2012, the Company had no open positions of these instruments. Likewise, operations terminated at December 31, 2012 on these instruments represented a gain of Ps.107,994, which was recognized in income as comprehensive financing cost, net.

At December 31, 2012, the Company had no margin calls, which are required to be applied against payments, due to price changes in the underlying asset.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company reclassified the amount of Ps.235,782 from comprehensive income and recognized it as part of inventory. This amount refers to the gain from the closed operations for corn hedges, in which the grain, subject to these hedges, was received. Additionally, the corn hedges terminated during the period and for which no corn has been received, originated a gain of Ps.340,873, which was recognized in comprehensive income.

D) FAIR VALUE HIERARCHY

A three-level hierarchy is used to measure and disclose fair values. An instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of significant input to its valuation.

The following is a description of the three hierarchy levels:

·Level 1—Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

·Level 2—Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets.

·Level 3—Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.

This hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. The Company considers relevant and observable market prices in its valuations where possible.

F-67

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

a. Determination of fair value

When available, the Company generally uses quoted market prices to determine fair value and classifies such items in Level 1. If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is valued using industry standard valuation models. When applicable, these models project future cash flows and discount the future amounts to a present value using market-based observable inputs, including interest rates, currency rates, volatilities, etc. Items valued using such inputs are classified according to the lowest level input or value driver that is significant to the valuation. Thus, an item may be classified in Level 3 even though there may be some inputs that are readily observable. In addition, the Company considers assumptions for its own credit risk and the respective counterparty risk.

b. Measurement

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are summarized below:

	At December 31, 2013
	Level 1					Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Plan assets — seniority premium fund	Ps.	56,240				Ps.	—	Ps.	—	Ps.	56,240
Derivative financial instruments — exchange rate	—					12,282		—		12,282
Investment in Venezuela available for sale	—					—		3,109,013		3,109,013		(1)
	Ps.		56,240			Ps.	12,282	Ps.	3,109,013	Ps.	3,177,535
Liabilities:
Derivative financial instruments — corn	Ps.			71,540		Ps.	—	Ps.	—	Ps.	71,540
Contingent payment due to repurchase of the Company’s own shares	—					—		671,069		671,069
	Ps.				71,540	Ps.	—	Ps.	671,069	Ps.	742,609

(1)Following the applicable guidelines and considering that the range of reasonable fair-value estimates was significant and the probabilities of the various estimates within the range could not be reasonably assessed, the Company recognized this financial asset at its carrying value and not at its fair value. See Note 28.

	At December 31, 2012
	Level 1		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Plan assets — seniority premium fund	Ps.	48,910	Ps.	—	Ps.	48,910
Derivative financial instruments — corn and other raw materials	119,275		—		119,275
	Ps.	168,185	Ps.	—	Ps.	168,185
Liabilities:
Derivative financial instruments — natural gas	Ps.	—	Ps.	28,832	Ps.	28,832
Contingent payment due to repurchase of the Company’s own shares	—		606,495		606,495
	Ps.	—	Ps.	635,327	Ps.	635,327

F-68

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

There were no transfers between the three levels in the period.

Level 1 - Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets

Financial instruments that are negotiated in active markets are classified as Level 1. The inputs used in the Company’s financial statements to measure the fair value include quoted market prices of corn listed on the Chicago Board of Trade.

Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets

Financial instruments that are classified as Level 2 refer mainly to quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, as well as model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets.

Derivative financial instruments — exchange rate

Exchange rate financial instruments were recorded at fair value, which was determined based on future cash flows discounted to present value. Significant data used to determine the fair value of these instruments were as follows:

	At December 31, 2013
Forward exchange rate	13.12
Discount rate	3.79	%

Level 3 - Valuation techniques

The Company has classified as Level 3 those financial instruments whose fair values are obtained using valuation models that include observable inputs but also include certain unobservable inputs.

The table below includes a roll-forward of the balance sheet amounts for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 for financial instruments classified by the Company within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. When a determination is made to classify a financial instrument within Level 3, it is due to the use of significant unobservable inputs. However, Level 3 financial instruments typically include, in addition to the unobservable or level 3 components, observable components (that is, components that are actively quoted and can be validated to external sources); accordingly, the gains and losses in the table below include changes in fair value due, in part, to observable factors that are part of the valuation methodology:

F-69

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

	Contingent payment due to repurchase of the Company’s own shares		Derivative financial instruments – other raw materials			Investment available for sale
Balance as of December 31, 2011	Ps.	—	Ps.	46,013		Ps.	—
Total gains or losses:						—
In the income statement	—		(17,781		)	—
In the comprehensive income statement						—
Additional provision	606,495		—			—
Balance as of December 31, 2012	606,495		28,832			—
Investment in Venezuela available for sale	—		—			3,109,013
Total gains or losses:
In the income statement	64,574		(28,832		)	—
In the comprehensive income statement	—		—			—
Additional provision	—		—			—
Balance as of December 31, 2013	Ps.	671,069	Ps.	—		Ps.	3,109,013

Contingent payment due to repurchase of the Company’s own shares

Regarding the contingent payment due to repurchase of the Company’s own shares and as mentioned in Note 3, the Company recognized a contingent payment liability amounting to Ps.671,069 (U.S.$51.3 million) and Ps.606,495 (U.S.$46.6 million) at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, regarding the scenario identified as (i) in that Note. This provision is related to the increase in GRUMA’s shares market price, over the closing price of GRUMA’s shares determined for purposes of the transaction, at the end of a 42-month period.

The contingent payment liability was recognized at fair value, which was determined using discounted future cash flows and a discount rate which represented the average rate of return of bonds issued by companies comparable to GRUMA. Subsequent changes in the fair value of the contingent payment liability will be recognized in the income statement. The Monte Carlo simulation model was used to estimate the future price of the shares; this model includes the expected return and weighted volatility of historical prices of GRUMA’s shares over a period of 42 months.

Significant data used to determine the fair value of the contingent payment liability is as follows:

	At December 31,
	2013	2012
Weighted volatility of historical prices of GRUMA’s shares	38.83%	29.78%
Weighted average price of GRUMA’s shares (simulated)	Ps.316.95 per share	Ps.58.79 per share
Forward exchange rate	Ps.14.07 per dollar	Ps.14.65 per dollar
Discount rate	6.80%	7.30%

An increase or decrease of 10% in the disccount rate used for the calculation of fair value, would result in an effect of Ps.9,571 and Ps.12,100, at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

F-70

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

Derivative financial instruments — natural gas

Natural gas derivative financial instruments were recognized at fair value, which was determined using future cash flow discounted to present value, using quoted market prices of natural gas listed on the NYMEX Exchange.

For the Company, the unobservable input included in the valuation of this Level 3 financial instrument refers solely to the Company’s own credit risk. For the year 2012 the Company’s management believes that a possible reasonable change in this unobservable assumption will not cause a change where the fair value can materially exceed the carrying value.

Investment available for sale

The investment in Venezuela available for sale is recognized at the best estimated amount considered by the Company, which is represented by its carrying value, since no active market exists for this investment. See Note 28 for more information.

23. EXPENSES BY NATURE

Expenses by nature are presented in the income statement within the captions of cost of sales and selling and administrative expenses and are analyzed as follows:

	2013		2012		2011
Cost of raw materials consumed and changes in inventory (Note 10)	Ps.	23,579,575	Ps.	26,409,848	Ps.	29,562,447
Employee benefit expenses (Note 25)	11,392,101		11,559,797		10,248,848
Depreciation	1,466,579		1,513,790		1,396,259
Amortization	169,869		76,602		65,049
Rental expense of operating leases (Note 29)	733,861		722,739		630,406
Research and development expenses (Note 14)	144,563		136,826		91,011

24. OTHER EXPENSES, NET

Other expenses, net comprised the following:

	2013			2012			2011
Net loss from sale of fixed assets	Ps.	(85,672	)	Ps.	(14,053	)	Ps.	(4,201	)
Net (loss) gain from sale of scrap	(2,293		)	2,092			1,084
Impairment loss on long-lived assets	(45,235		)	(4,014		)	(93,808		)
Cost of written-down fixed assets	—			(37,681		)	(52,271		)
Current employees’ statutory profit sharing	(53,725		)	(79,610		)	(36,959		)
Non-recoverable cost of damaged assets	(4,240		)	(5,852		)	(17,695		)
Result from derivative financial instruments	(1,330		)	38,148			—
Total	Ps.	(192,495	)	Ps.	(100,970	)	Ps.	(203,850	)

F-71

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

25. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EXPENSES

Employee benefit expenses are comprised of the following:

	2013		2012		2011
Salaries, wages and benefits (including termination benefits)	Ps.	10,668,575	Ps.	10,776,058	Ps.	9,653,863
Social security contributions	613,129		676,469		559,638
Employment benefits (Note 19)	110,397		107,270		35,347
Total	Ps.	11,392,101	Ps.	11,559,797	Ps.	10,248,848

26.  COMPREHENSIVE FINANCING COST

Comprehensive financing cost, net is comprised by:

	2013			2012			2011
Interest expense (Note 16)	Ps.	(1,105,563	)	Ps.	(900,733	)	Ps.	(945,499	)
Interest income	39,319			48,257			69,153
Gain from derivative financial instruments (Note 22)	42,067			107,994			207,816
Gain (loss) from foreign exchange differences, net	55,763			(82,212		)	41,217
Comprehensive financing cost, net	Ps.	(968,414	)	Ps.	(826,694	)	Ps.	(627,313	)

27.  INCOME TAX EXPENSE

A)  INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX

The domestic and foreign components of income before income tax are the following:

	For the years ended December 31,
	2013		2012		2011
Domestic	Ps.	1,574,119	Ps.	932,725	Ps.	5,995,927
Foreign	2,290,627		1,057,567		515,238
	Ps.	3,864,746	Ps.	1,990,292	Ps.	6,511,165

B)  COMPONENTS OF INCOME TAX EXPENSE

The components of income tax expense are the following:

	2013			2012			2011
Current tax:
Current tax on profits for the year	Ps.	(2,080,601	)	Ps.	(529,248	)	Ps.	(585,622	)
Adjustments in respect of prior years	137,645			(38,568		)	(137,514		)
Total current tax	(1,942,956		)	(567,816		)	(723,136		)

F-72

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

	2013			2012			2011
Deferred tax:
Origin and reversal of temporary differences	96,259			(433,039		)	(1,127,956		)
Tax credit derived from foreign dividends	—			138,074			232,821
Use of tax loss carryforwards not previously recognized	1,648,249			—			—
Total deferred tax	1,744,508			(294,965		)	(895,135		)
Total income tax expense	Ps.	(198,448	)	Ps.	(862,781	)	Ps.	(1,618,271	)

Domestic federal, foreign federal and state income taxes in the consolidated statements of income consisted of the following components:

	For the years ended December 31,
	2013			2012			2011
Current:
Domestic federal	Ps.	(1,023,859	)	Ps.	(208,851	)	Ps.	(316,407	)
Foreign federal	(810,651		)	(315,224		)	(363,064		)
Foreign state	(108,446		)	(43,741		)	(43,665		)
	(1,942,956		)	(567,816		)	(723,136		)
Deferred:
Domestic federal	1,599,957			(146,711		)	(896,374		)
Foreign federal	160,320			(153,677		)	(4,175		)
Foreign state	(15,769		)	5,423			5,414
	1,744,508			(294,965		)	(895,135		)
Total income taxes	Ps.	(198,448	)	Ps.	(862,781	)	Ps.	(1,618,271	)

C)  RECONCILIATION OF FINANCIAL AND TAXABLE INCOME

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the reconciliation between statutory income tax amounts and the effective income tax amounts is summarized as follows:

	2013			2012			2011
Statutory federal income tax (30% for 2013, 2012 and 2011)	Ps.	(1,159,424	)	Ps.	(597,085	)	Ps.	(1,953,350	)
Effects related to inflation	(149,104		)	(105,677		)	(62,230		)
Foreign income tax rate differences	(86,918		)	(57,008		)	(32,138		)
Tax credit derived from foreign dividends	—			383,740			232,821
Recoverable asset tax written off	—			(209,940		)	—
Tax loss carryforwards used	1,131,434			(86,620		)	186,772
Recovery of asset tax from previous years	216,204			—			—
Nondeductible expenses and others	(150,640		)	(190,191		)	9,854
Effective income tax (5.13%, 43.35% and 24.85% for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively)	Ps.	(198,448	)	Ps.	(862,781	)	Ps.	(1,618,271	)

F-73

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

In October 2013, the Chamber of Senators and Deputies approved the issuance of the new Income Tax Law, effective starting January 1, 2014, abrogating the Income Tax Law published on January 1, 2002. The new Income Tax Law captures the essence of the previous Income Tax Law; however, this new law makes significant changes, including an income tax rate of 30% for 2014 and the following years; compared to the previous Income Tax Law, which established tax rates of 30%, 29% and 28% for 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. This change had no significant effect in the income of the year.

28. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

A) LOSS OF CONTROL OF VENEZUELA

On May 12, 2010, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (the “Republic”) published in the Official Gazette of Venezuela Decree number 7,394 (the “Expropriation Decree”), dated April 27, 2010 which announced the forced acquisition of all goods, personal property and real estate of MONACA. The Republic has expressed to GRUMA’s representatives that the Expropriation Decree extends to DEMASECA.

As stated in the Expropriation Decree and in accordance with the Venezuelan Expropriation Law (the “Expropriation Law”), the transfer of legal ownership can occur either through an “Amicable Administrative Arrangement” or a “Judicial Order”. Each process requires certain steps as indicated in the Expropriation Law, none of which have occurred. Therefore, as of this date, no formal transfer of title of the assets covered by the Expropriation Decree has taken place.

GRUMA’s interests in MONACA and DEMASECA are held through two Spanish companies: Valores Mundiales, S.L. (“Valores Mundiales”) and Consorcio Andino, S.L. (“Consorcio Andino”). In 2010, Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino (collectively, the “Investors”) commenced negotiations with the Republic with the intention of reaching an amicable settlement. Through Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino, GRUMA participated in these negotiations with a view to (i) continuing its presence in Venezuela by potentially entering into a joint venture with the Venezuelan government; and/or (ii) seeking adequate compensation for the assets subject to expropriation.

The Republic and the Kingdom of Spain are parties to a Treaty on Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments, dated November 2, 1995 (the “Investment Treaty”), under which the Investors may settle investment disputes by means of arbitration before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”). On November 9, 2011, the Investors, MONACA and DEMASECA provided formal notice to the Republic that an investment dispute had arisen as a consequence of the Expropriation Decree and related measures adopted by the Republic. In that notification, the Investors, MONACA and DEMASECA also agreed to submit the dispute to ICSID arbitration if the parties were unable to reach an amicable agreement.

The Ministry of Popular Power for Internal Relations and Justice published on January 22, 2013 Administrative Providence number 004-13 dated January 21, 2013 (the “Providence”) in the Official Gazette of Venezuela. The dispositions contained in the Providence are effective starting the date when published in the Official Gazette.

F-74

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

Through this Providence, Special Managers were designated for MONACA and DEMASECA. The Preamble of the Providence indicates that its objective is to provide “the Special Managers, […] with the broadest powers to execute all necessary actions with the purpose of pursuing continuity and avoiding disruption of the operations of the companies under its management.” Consequently, Article 2 of the Providence provides Special Managers “with the broadest management faculties for ensuring the possession, care, custody, use, and conservation of movable and immovable assets of [Monaca and Demaseca]; in such regard, the Special Managers must safeguard the assets, goods and rights from the companies indicated, in order to achieve their full operability.” Likewise, Article 4 orders that Special Managers “must present the financial statements for their performance at the end of its economic period [, and must] […] comply with the public policies related to the agricultural food industry issued by the competent Ministry related to food, by providing required information.”

Given the Providence, the designation of the Special Managers and the broadest management faculties that these managers were conferred by the Republic, GRUMA determined that it has lost control of MONACA and DEMASECA. Based on the facts and circumstances described above and following the principles set by IFRS, the Company lost the ability to affect the variable returns and concluded that it has lost the control of MONACA and DEMASECA on January 22, 2013. Consequently and as a result of such loss of control, the Company proceeded with the following:

a)Ceased the consolidation of the financial information of MONACA and DEMASECA starting January 22, 2013 and derecognized the assets and liabilities of these companies from the consolidated balance sheet. For disclosure and presentation purposes, the Company considered these subsidiaries as a significant segment and therefore, applying the guidelines from IFRS 5 treated MONACA and DEMASECA as discontinued operations; consequently, the results and cash flows generated by the Venezuelan companies for the periods presented were classified as discontinued operations.

b)The amounts recognized in other comprehensive income relating to these companies were reclassified to the consolidated income statement as part of the results from discontinued operations, considering that MONACA and DEMASECA were disposed of due to the loss of control.

c)Recognized the investment in MONACA and DEMASECA as a financial asset, classifying it as an available-for-sale financial asset. The Company classified its investment in these companies as available for sale since management believes it is the appropriate treatment applicable to a non-voluntary disposition of assets and the asset does not fulfill the requirements of classification in another category of financial assets. Following the applicable guidelines and considering that the range of reasonable fair-value estimates was significant and the probabilities of the various estimates within the range could not be reasonably assessed, the Company recognized this financial asset at its carrying value translated to the functional currency of the Company using an exchange rate of $2.9566 Mexican pesos per bolivar (Bs.4.3 per U.S. dollar), which was effective at the date of the loss of control, and not at its fair value. The investment in MONACA and DEMASECA is subject to impairment tests at the end of each reporting period when there is objective evidence that the financial asset is impaired. At December 31, 2013, no impairment for these assets was identified.

F-75

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

While negotiations with the government may take place from time to time, the Company cannot assure that such negotiations will be successful or will result in the Investors receiving adequate compensation, if any, for their investments subject to the Expropriation Decree. Additionally, the Company cannot predict the results of any arbitral proceeding, or the ramifications that costly and prolonged legal disputes could have on its results of operations or financial position, or the likelihood of collecting a successful arbitration award. The Company and its subsidiaries reserve and intend to continue to reserve the right to seek full compensation for any and all expropriated assets and investments under applicable law, including investment treaties and customary international law.

As a consequence of the events mentioned above, on May 10, 2013, Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino presented an arbitration application before the ICSID, based in the city of Washington, D.C. ICSID registered the arbitration application on June 11, 2013 under case number ARB/13/11. The arbitration panel has already been formed. The purpose of the arbitration is to seek compensation for the damages caused by the Republic’s violation of the Articles III (obstruction of management, maintenance, development, using, enjoyment, extension, sale and liquidation of the investment), IV (lack of fair and equitable treatment) and V (transfer of investment income as repatriation of capital, royalty payment) of the Investment Treaty, to the detriment of Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino, in their capacity as Spanish investors. In the arbitration application filed before ICSID, Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino have reserved their rights to extend the dispute against the Republic, in case it executes the forced acquisition of MONACA and DEMASECA Decree.

While awaiting resolution of this matter and as required by IFRS, GRUMA performed impairment tests on the investments in MONACA and DEMASECA to determine a potential recoverable amount, using two valuation techniques: 1) an income approach considering estimated future cash flows as a going concern business, discounted at present value using an appropriate discount rate (weighted average cost of capital) of 13.7% and an estimated future exchange rate of $1.18293 pesos per bolivar (Bs.11.3 per U.S. dollar), and 2) a market approach, such as the public company market multiple method using implied multiples such as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and revenues of comparable companies adjusted for liquidity, control and disposal expenses. In both cases, the potential recoverable amounts using the income and market approach were higher than the carrying value of these investments and therefore, no impairment adjustment was deemed necessary. Regarding the calculations to determine a potential recoverable amount, the Company’s management believes that a possible reasonable change in the key assumptions would not cause the carrying value of the Company’s investment in MONACA and DEMASECA materially exceed the potential recoverable amount before described.

The historical value of the net investment in MONACA and DEMASECA at January 22, 2013, the date when the Company ceased the consolidation of the financial information of MONACA and DEMASECA, was Ps.2,913,760 and Ps.195,253, respectively. The Company does not have insurance for the risk of expropriation of its investments.

Financial information regarding MONACA and DEMASECA at January 22, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (there are no material transactions between MONACA and DEMASECA and the Company that need to be eliminated), is shown below:

F-76

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

	At January 22, 2013			At December 31, 2012
Current assets	Ps.	4,345,709		Ps.	4,463,157
Non-current assets	2,558,444			2,624,411
Total assets	6,904,153			7,087,569
Percentage of consolidated total assets	14.0		%	14.3		%
Current liabilities	2,641,540			2,853,060
Non-current liabilities	96,103			95,132
Total liabilities	2,737,643			2,948,192
Percentage of consolidated total liabilities	7.8		%	8.4		%
Total net assets	4,166,510			4,139,377
Percentage of consolidated total net assets	29.1		%	28.8		%
Non-controlling interest	1,057,497			1,049,088
Interest of Gruma in total net assets	Ps.	3,109,013		Ps.	3,090,289

Additionally, at December 31, 2013 certain subsidiaries of GRUMA have accounts receivable with the Venezuelan companies for a total amount of Ps.1,137,718. According to tests performed by the Company, these receivables are not impaired. See Note 9.

B) ANALYSIS OF GAIN OR LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

	2013			2012			2011
Net sales	Ps.	880,991		Ps.	9,907,182		Ps.	9,156,603
Cost of sales	(668,091		)	(7,500,396		)	(6,746,763		)
Gross profit	212,900			2,406,786			2,409,840
Selling and administrative expenses	(129,960		)	(1,707,076		)	(1,498,724		)
Other expenses, net	(1,431		)	(687		)	—
Operating income	81,509			699,023			911,116
Comprehensive financing cost, net	21,471			97,735			200,113
Income before income taxes	102,980			796,758			1,111,229
Income taxes	(26,850		)	(220,510		)	(188,301		)
Discontinued operations	76,130			576,248			922,928
Reclassification of foreign currency translation adjustment	(432,459		)	—			—
(Loss) gain from discontinued operations	Ps.	(356,329	)	Ps.	576,248		Ps.	922,928
Attributable to:
Shareholders	Ps.	(261,461	)	Ps.	439,010		Ps.	671,742
Non-controlling interest		(94,868	)		137,238			251,186
	Ps.	(356,329	)	Ps.	576,248		Ps.	922,928

F-77

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

29. COMMITMENTS

A) OPERATING LEASES

The Company is leasing certain facilities and equipment under long-term lease agreements in effect through 2027, which include an option for renewal. These agreements are recognized as operating leases, since the contracts do not transfer substantially all risks and advantages inherent to ownership.

Future minimum lease payments under operating lease agreements are as follows:

	2013		2012
No later than 1 year	Ps.	586,314	Ps.	544,281
Later than 1 year and no later than 5 years	1,056,789		1,214,100
Later than 5 years	308,252		509,911
	Ps.	1,951,355	Ps.	2,268,292

Rental expense was approximately Ps.733,861, Ps.722,739 and Ps.630,406 for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

B) FINANCE LEASES

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the net carrying values of assets recorded under finance leases totaled Ps.20,298 and Ps.22,683, respectively, and corresponded to transportation and production equipment.

Future minimum lease payments under finance lease agreements are as follows:

	2013		2012
No later than 1 year	Ps.	3,771	Ps.	16,778
Later than 1 year and no later than 5 years	11,024		22,787
	14,795		39,565
Future finance charges on finance leases	—		(649		)
Present value of finance lease liabilities	Ps.	14,795	Ps.	38,916

The present value of finance lease liabilities is as follows:

	2013		2012
No later than 1 year	Ps.	3,771	Ps.	16,294
Later than 1 year and no later than 5 years	11,024		22,622
Total	Ps.	14,795	Ps.	38,916

C) OTHER COMMITMENTS

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had various outstanding commitments to purchase commodities and raw materials in the United States for approximately Ps.3,112,207 and Ps.2,680,523, respectively (U.S.$238 million and U.S.$206 million, respectively) and in Mexico for approximately Ps.2,850,677 and Ps.624,485, respectively (U.S.$218 million and U.S.$48 million, respectively), which will be delivered during 2014. The Company has concluded that there are not embedded derivatives resulting from these contracts.

F-78

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

At December 31, 2013, the Company had outstanding commitments to purchase machinery and equipment in the United States amounting to approximately Ps.128,689 (approximately Ps.106,919 in 2012 in Mexico and the United States).

30. CONTINGENCIES

MEXICO

Income Tax Claim.- The Ministry of Finance and Public Credit has lodged certain tax assessments against the Company for an amount of Ps.29.9 million plus penalties, updates and charges, in connection with withholding on interest payments to our foreign creditors during the years 2001 and 2002. Mexican tax authorities claim that the Company should have withheld at a higher rate than the 4.9% actually withheld by the Company. The Company filed several motions to annul these assessments, which later were relinquished, in order to be eligible for the tax amnesty program set forth in the Provisional Article Third of the Federal Income Law for the 2013 Fiscal Year.

Thereafter on May 2013, the partial tax assessment relief was authorized, by which the Company paid Ps.3.3 million on May 21, 2013 to finalize the dispute.

On January 29, 2014, the Company was notified of an official letter whereby the International Taxation Central Administration Office lodged a tax assessment for the amount of Ps.41.2 million in connection with the 2001 and 2002 years, and derived from the initial allegation made in 2005. Given that the assessment subject to allegation was partially relieved (80%) and, that the remaining amount was paid on May of 2013, the Company intends to request its reversal through the filing of the respective appeal.

The Company intends to vigorously defend against this action. It is the opinion of the Company that the outcome of this proceeding will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

CNBV Investigation.- On December 8, 2009, the Surveillance Office of the Comisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores (the Mexican National Banking and Securities Commission, or CNBV) began an investigation into the Company in respect of the timely disclosure of material events reported through the Mexican Stock Exchange during the end of 2008 and throughout 2009 in connection with the Company’s foreign exchange derivative losses and the subsequent conversion of the realized losses into debt.  In 2011, the CNBV commenced an administrative proceeding against the Company for alleged infringements to applicable legislation. The Company has participated in this proceeding in order to demonstrate its compliance with current legislation and to adopt applicable defenses as deemed appropriate in order to protect GRUMA’s interests.

On October 29, 2013, the Company was notified by the CNBV of its resolution whereby a fine equivalent to Ps.4.1 million was imposed to the Company, same which was timely paid by the Company and therefore, the proceeding initiated by the CNBV on August of 2011, was finally concluded.

UNITED STATES

Cox v. Gruma Corporation.- On or about December 21, 2012, a consumer filed a putative class action against Gruma Corporation, claiming that Mission tortilla chips should not be labeled “All Natural” if they contain certain non-natural ingredients. The plaintiff seeks restitution or other actual damages

F-79

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

including attorneys’ fees.  In response to a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granted in part Gruma Corporation’s motion, and referred to the US FDA for an administrative determination regarding the use of the “All Natural” identifier.  On January 6, 2014 the FDA responded that it would not, at this time, consider the referred issue.  The court then requested additional briefing from the parties, and will be proceeding with the case.

Gruma Corporation intends to vigorously defend against this action. It is the opinion of Gruma Corporation that the outcome of this proceeding will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

Griffith v. Gruma Corporation. — On or about August 12, 2013, a consumer filed a putative class action against Gruma Corporation, claiming that Mission tortilla chips should not be labeled “All Natural” if they contain certain non-natural ingredients.  The plaintiff seeks restitution or other actual damages including attorneys’ fees.  In response to a motion to dismiss filed by Gruma Corporation, plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint and Motion to Certify Class. On October 25, 2013, Gruma Corporation filed a motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint, and on October 29, 2013, filed a Motion to Stay Determination of Plaintiff’s Motion to Certify Class. Those motions are pending.

Gruma Corporation intends to vigorously defend against this action. It is the opinion of Gruma Corporation that the outcome of this proceeding will not have a material adverse effect on Gruma Corporation’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Ana G. Gracias v. Gruma Corporation. — On or about June 26, 2013, plaintiff, a former employee of Gruma Corporation, filed a putative class action against Gruma Corporation seeking damages for certain wage and hour claims under California law. The court has entered a stay while Gruma Corporation evaluates plaintiff’s claims and prepares its answer. Gruma Corporation intends to vigorously defend against this action. It is the opinion of Gruma Corporation that the outcome of this proceeding will not have a material adverse effect on Gruma Corporation’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

VENEZUELA

Expropriation Proceedings by the Venezuelan Government.- On May 12, 2010, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (the “Republic”) published in the Official Gazette of Venezuela decree number 7,394 (the “Expropriation Decree”), dated April 27, 2010 which announced the forced acquisition of all goods, personal property and real estate of MONACA. The Republic has expressed to GRUMA’s representatives that the Expropriation Decree extends to DEMASECA.

As stated in the Expropriation Decree and in accordance with the Venezuelan Expropriation Law (the “Expropriation Law”), the transfer of legal ownership can occur either through an “Amicable Administrative Arrangement” or a “Judicial Order”. Each process requires certain steps as indicated in the Expropriation Law, none of which have occurred. Therefore, as of this date, no formal transfer of title of the assets covered by the Expropriation Decree has taken place.

As mentioned in Note 28, GRUMA’s interests in MONACA and DEMASECA are held through two Spanish companies: Valores Mundiales, S.L. (“Valores Mundiales”) and Consorcio Andino, S.L. (“Consorcio Andino”). In 2010, Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino (collectively, the “Investors”) commenced negotiations with the Republic with the intention of reaching an amicable settlement. Through Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino, GRUMA participated in these negotiations with a view to (i) continuing its presence in Venezuela by potentially entering into a joint

F-80

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

venture with the Venezuelan government; and/or (ii) seeking adequate compensation for the assets subject to expropriation.

The Republic and the Kingdom of Spain are parties to a Treaty on Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments, dated November 2, 1995 (the “Investment Treaty”), under which the Investors may settle investment disputes by means of arbitration before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”). On November 9, 2011, the Investors, MONACA and DEMASECA provided formal notice to the Republic that an investment dispute had arisen as a consequence of the Expropriation Decree and related measures adopted by the Republic. In that notification, the Investors, MONACA and DEMASECA also agreed to submit the dispute to ICSID arbitration if the parties were unable to reach an amicable agreement.

On January 22, 2013, the Venezuelan Government issued a resolution providing the right to take control over the operations of MONACA and DEMASECA.

While negotiations with the government may take place from time to time, the Company cannot assure that such negotiations will be successful or will result in the Investors receiving adequate compensation, if any, for their investments subject to the Expropriation Decree. Additionally, the Company cannot predict the results of any arbitral proceeding, or the ramifications that costly and prolonged legal disputes could have on its results of operations or financial position, or the likelihood of collecting a successful arbitration award. The Company and its subsidiaries reserve and intend to continue to reserve the right to seek full compensation for any and all expropriated assets and investments under applicable law, including investment treaties and customary international law.

On May 10, 2013, Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino presented an arbitration application before the ICSID, based in the city of Washington, D.C. ICSID registered the arbitration application on June 11, 2013 under case No. ARB/13/11. The arbitration panel has already been formed. The purpose of the arbitration is to seek compensation for the damages caused by the Republic’s violation of Articles III (obstruction of management, maintenance, development, using, enjoyment, extension, sale and liquidation of the investment), IV (lack of fair and equitable treatment) and V (transfer of investment income as repatriation of capital, royalty payment) of the Investment Treaty, to the detriment of Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino, in their capacity as Spanish investors. In the arbitration application filed before the ICSID, Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino have reserved their rights to extend the dispute against the Republic, in case it executes the forced acquisition of MONACA and DEMASECA Decree.

While awaiting resolution of this matter and as required by the IFRS, GRUMA performed impairment tests on the investments in MONACA and DEMASECA to determine a potential recoverable amount, using two valuation techniques: 1) an income approach considering estimated future cash flows as a going concern business, discounted at present value using an appropriate discount rate (weighted average cost of capital) of 13.7% and an estimated future exchange rate of Bs.11.3 per U.S. dollar, and 2) a market approach, such as the public company market multiple method using implied multiples such as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and revenues of comparable companies adjusted for liquidity, control and disposal expenses. In both cases, the potential recoverable amounts using the income and market approach were higher than the carrying value of these investments and therefore, no impairment adjustment was deemed necessary.

The historical value of the net investment in MONACA and DEMASECA at January 22, 2013, the date when the Company ceased the consolidation of the financial information of MONACA and DEMASECA, was Ps.2,913,760 and Ps.195,253, respectively. Additionally, at December 31, 2013

F-81

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

certain subsidiaries of GRUMA have accounts receivable with the Venezuelan companies totaling Ps.1,137,718. The Company does not have insurance for the risk of expropriation of its investments.

Intervention Proceedings by the Venezuelan Government.- On December 4, 2009, the Eleventh Investigations Court for Criminal Affairs of Caracas issued an order authorizing the precautionary seizure of assets in which Ricardo Fernández Barrueco had any interest. As a result of Ricardo Fernández Barrueco’s former indirect minority ownership of MONACA and DEMASECA, these subsidiaries were subject to the precautionary measure. Between 2009 and 2012, the Ministry of Finance of Venezuela, pursuant to the precautionary measure ordered by the court, designated several special managers of the indirect minority shareholding that Ricardo Fernández Barrueco previously owned in MONACA and DEMASECA. On January 22, 2013, the Ministry of Justice and Internal Relations revoked the prior designations made by the Ministry of Finance of Venezuela and made a new designation of individuals as special managers and representatives on behalf of the Republic of Venezuela of MONACA and DEMASECA, providing the right to take control over the operations of these companies.

As a result of the foregoing, MONACA and DEMASECA, as well as Consorcio Andino and Valores Mundiales, as holders of the Venezuelan subsidiaries, filed a petition as aggrieved third-parties to the proceedings against Ricardo Fernández Barrueco challenging the precautionary measures and all related actions. On November 19, 2010, the Eleventh Investigations Court for Criminal Affairs of Caracas ruled that MONACA and DEMASECA are companies wholly controlled by Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino, respectively. However, the precautionary measures issued on December 4, 2009 were kept in effect by the court, despite the court’s recognition that Valores Mundiales and Consorcio Andino are the sole owners of MONACA and DEMASECA, respectively. An appeal has been filed, which is pending resolution as of this date.

INDEPABIS issued an order, on a precautionary basis, authorizing the temporary occupation and operation of MONACA for a period of 90 calendar days from December 16, 2009, which was renewed for 90 days on March 16, 2010. The order expired on June 16, 2010 and as of the date hereof MONACA has not been notified of any extension or similar measure. INDEPABIS has also initiated a regulatory proceeding against MONACA in connection with alleged failure to comply with regulations governing precooked corn flour and for allegedly refusing to sell this product as a result of the December 4, 2009 precautionary asset seizure described above. The Company filed an appeal against these proceedings which has not been resolved as of the date hereof.

Additionally, INDEPABIS initiated an investigation of DEMASECA and issued an order, on a precautionary basis, authorizing the temporary occupation and operation of DEMASECA for a period of 90 calendar days from May 25, 2010, which was extended until November 21, 2010. INDEPABIS issued a new precautionary measure of occupation and temporary operation of DEMASECA, valid for the duration of this investigation. DEMASECA has challenged these measures but as of the date hereof, no resolution has been issued. The proceedings are still ongoing.

The Company intends to exhaust all legal remedies available in order to safeguard and protect the Company’s legitimate interests.

Finally, the Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various pending litigations filed in the normal course of business. It is the opinion of the Company that the outcome of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operation, or cash flows of the Company.

F-82

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

31.  RELATED PARTIES

Related party transactions were carried out at market value.

A)  SALES OF GOODS AND SERVICES

	For the years ended December 31,
	2013		2012		2011
Sales of goods:
Associate	Ps.	50,821	Ps.	49,783	Ps.	41,318
Sale of services:
Entities that have significant influence over the Company	18,203		34,106		41,519
Associate	—		1,294		1,349
	Ps.	69,024	Ps.	85,183	Ps.	84,186

B) PURCHASES OF GOODS AND SERVICES

	For the years ended December 31,
	2013		2012		2011
Purchases of goods:
Entities that have significant influence over the Company	Ps.	—	Ps.	2,350,350	Ps.	1,836,942
Associate	—		931		539
Purchases of services:
Associate	35,719		33,385		31,048
Other related parties	18,379		114,422		110,239
	Ps.	54,098	Ps.	2,499,088	Ps.	1,978,768

Other transactions with related parties are identified in Note 3.

C)  KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL COMPENSATION

Key management includes Board members, alternate Board members, officers and members of the Audit Committee and Corporate Practice Committee. The compensation paid to key management for employee services is shown below:

	2013		2012		2011
Salaries and other short-term employee benefits	Ps.	132,371	Ps.	179,492	Ps.	186,707
Termination benefits	66,561		33,527		20,227
Total	Ps.	198,932	Ps.	213,019	Ps.	206,934

At December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the reserve for deferred compensation amounted to Ps.34.8, Ps.62.3 and Ps.49.8 million, respectively.

F-83

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

D)  BALANCES WITH RELATED PARTIES

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the balances with related parties were as follows:

	Natureof thetransaction	AtDecember 31, 2013		AtDecember 31, 2012
Receivables from related parties:
Associate	Commercial and services	Ps.	592	Ps.	1,423
Other related parties		2,352		2,391
		Ps.	2,944	Ps.	3,814
Payables from related parties:
Other related parties	Services	Ps.	—	Ps.	845

The balances payable to related parties at December 31, 2013 expire during 2014 and do not bear interest.

32.  FINANCIAL STANDARDS ISSUED BUT NOT YET EFFECTIVE

The new IFRS, which will become effective after the issuance of the Company’s financial statements, are explained below. This list includes those IFRS standards which the Company reasonably expects to apply in the future. The Company has the intention of adopting these new IFRS on the date they become effective.

A)NEW STANDARDS

a. IFRS 9, “Financial Instruments”

IFRS 9, “Financial Instruments” was published in November 2009 and contained requirements for the classification and measurement of financial assets. Requirements for financial liabilities were added to IFRS 9 in October 2010. Most of the requirements for financial liabilities were carried forward unchanged from IAS 39. However, some changes were made to the fair value option for financial liabilities to address the issue of own credit risk. In December 2011, the IASB amended IFRS 9 in order to require its application for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2015. However, on November 2013, amendments were issued to remove January 1, 2015 as effective date of implementation. The new effective date will be determined once the phases of classification and measurement and impairment of IFRS 9 are completed.

B)AMENDMENTS

a. IAS 19, “Employee Benefits”

On November 2013, IASB amended IAS 19 regarding Defined Benefit Obligation and Employee Contributions. The purpose of this amendment is to provide additional guidance on accounting for employee contributions or third parties to a defined benefit plan. Amendments to IAS 19 are effective for annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2014.

F-84

GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

(In thousands of Mexican pesos, except where otherwise indicated)

b. IAS 32, “Financial Instruments: Presentation”

In December 2011, the IASB amended the accounting requirements related to the offsetting of financial assets and financial liabilities by issuing amendment to IAS 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation. The amendments to IAS 32 are intended to clarify existing application issues relating to the offsetting rules and reduce the level of diversity in current practice, by focusing in the meaning of ‘currently has a legally enforceable right of set-off’ and the application of simultaneous realization and settlement. These amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014.

c. IAS 39, “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement”

In June 2013, the IASB amended IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement to clarify that there is no need to discontinue hedge accounting if a hedging derivative is novated, as long as certain criteria are met. A novation indicates an event where the original parties to a derivative agree that one or more clearing counterparties replace their original counterparty to become the new counterparty to each of the parties. In order to apply the amendments and continue hedge accounting, novation to a central counterparty (CCP) must happen as a consequence of laws or regulations or the introduction of laws or regulations. This standard is applicable to annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014.

The Company’s management expects that the adoption of the new standards and amendments explained above will not have significant effects in its financial statements.

F-85