Commitments and Contingencies	12 Months Ended
Jan. 02, 2021
Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	16.Commitments and Contingencies Securities Class Action and Derivative Matters In March 2019, two substantially identical class action complaints alleging violations of the federal securities laws were filed by individual shareholders against the Company, certain of the Company’s current officers and the Company’s former controlling shareholder, Artal Group S.A. (“Artal”), in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The actions were consolidated and lead plaintiffs were appointed in June 2019. A consolidated amended complaint was filed on July 29, 2019, naming as defendants the Company, certain of the Company’s current officers and directors, and Artal and certain of its affiliates. A second consolidated amended complaint was filed on September 27, 2019. The operative complaint asserts claims on behalf of all purchasers of the Company’s common stock between May 4, 2018 and February 26, 2019, inclusive (the “Class Period”), including purchasers of the Company’s common stock traceable to the May 2018 secondary offering of the Company’s common stock by certain of its shareholders. The complaint alleges that, during the Class Period, the defendants disseminated materially false and misleading statements and/or concealed or recklessly disregarded material adverse facts. The complaint alleges claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and with respect to the secondary offering, under Sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The plaintiffs sought to recover unspecified damages on behalf of the class members. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on October 31, 2019. On November 30, 2020, the Court granted the Company’s motion to dismiss in full and dismissed the complaint. The plaintiffs did not appeal. Between March and July 2019, the Company received shareholder litigation demands alleging breaches of fiduciary duties by certain current and former Company directors and executive officers, to the alleged injury of the Company. The allegations in the demands relate to those contained in the dismissed securities class action litigation. In response to the demands, pursuant to Virginia law, the Board of Directors has created a special committee to investigate and evaluate the claims made in the demands. In addition, four derivative complaints were filed, each making allegations against certain of the Company’s officers and directors and/or Artal and certain of its affiliates. First, on June 13, 2019, a shareholder derivative complaint was filed in the Southern District of New York against certain of the Company’s officers and directors alleging, among other things, that the defendants breached fiduciary duties to the alleged injury of the Company. The plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the complaint on July 8, 2019 and the Company agreed to treat the complaint as a litigation demand. Second, on July 23, 2019, another shareholder derivative complaint was filed in the Southern District of New York against certain of the Company’s officers and directors alleging, among other things, that the defendants breached fiduciary duties to the alleged injury of the Company. The plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the complaint the same day. Third, on October 25, 2019, another shareholder derivative complaint was filed in the Southern District of New York against certain of the Company’s officers and directors alleging, among other things, that the defendants breached fiduciary duties to the alleged injury of the Company. Finally, on December 16, 2019, a shareholder derivative complaint was filed in New York Supreme Court against certain of the Company’s officers and directors, and Artal and certain of its affiliates, alleging, among other things, that the defendants breached fiduciary duties to the alleged injury of the Company. This action and the derivative action filed October 25, 2019 were initially stayed pending a decision on the defendants’ motion to dismiss the securities class action and all parties agreed to an additional stay until February 25, 2021. The Company believes that these actions are without merit and intends to vigorously defend them. Member Class Action Matter In June 2020, a Workshops + Digital (then known as Studio + Digital) member filed a class action complaint against the Company in the Superior Court of California in Ventura County. The complaint was filed on behalf of all Workshops + Digital members nationwide and regards the fees charged for Workshops + Digital memberships since the replacement of in-person workshops with virtual workshops in March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The complaint alleged, among other things, that the Company’s decision to charge its members the full Workshops + Digital membership fee while only providing a virtual workshop experience violated California state consumer protection laws and gave rise to claims for breach of contract, fraud, and other tort causes of action based on the same factual allegations that are the basis for the breach of contract claim. The plaintiff seeks to recover damages plus injunctive relief to enjoin the Company from engaging in similar conduct in the future on behalf of the class members. On July 30, 2020, the Company filed a notice to remove the matter to the United States District Court for the Central District of California, and per the parties’ stipulation, on August 7, 2020, the case was transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. On September 23, 2020, the Company filed a motion to dismiss all of the plaintiff’s claims with prejudice. At the parties’ September 29, 2020 preliminary conference, the court issued an order permitting the plaintiff to either submit her opposition to the motion to dismiss or file an amended complaint by October 14, 2020. On October 14, 2020, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint with predominantly the same claims. The Company filed another motion to dismiss the matter on November 4, 2020. The plaintiff filed her opposition brief on November 19, 2020, and the Company filed its reply brief on November 25, 2020. The Company believes that this matter is without merit and intends to vigorously defend it. Other Litigation Matters Due to the nature of the Company’s activities, it is also, at times, subject to other pending and threatened legal actions that arise out of the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the disposition of any such matters is not expected, individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. However, the results of legal actions cannot be predicted with certainty. Therefore, it is possible that the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or cash flows could be materially adversely affected in any particular period by the unfavorable resolution of one or more legal actions. Commitments Minimum commitments under non-cancelable purchase obligations at January 2, 2021 was $28,239, of which $9,378 is due in fiscal 2021, $9,378 is due in fiscal 2022, $7,544 is due in fiscal 2023 and the remaining $1,939 is due in fiscal 2024. See Note 4 for disclosures related to minimum commitments under non-cancelable lease obligations, primarily for office and rental facilities operating leases.

Commitments and Contingencies

12 Months Ended

Jan. 02, 2021

Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

16.Commitments and Contingencies

Securities Class Action and Derivative Matters

In March 2019, two substantially identical class action complaints alleging violations of the federal securities laws were filed by individual shareholders against the Company, certain of the Company’s current officers and the Company’s former controlling shareholder, Artal Group S.A. (“Artal”), in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The actions were consolidated and lead plaintiffs were appointed in June 2019. A consolidated amended complaint was filed on July 29, 2019, naming as defendants the Company, certain of the Company’s current officers and directors, and Artal and certain of its affiliates. A second consolidated amended complaint was filed on September 27, 2019. The operative complaint asserts claims on behalf of all purchasers of the Company’s common stock between May 4, 2018 and February 26, 2019, inclusive (the “Class Period”), including purchasers of the Company’s common stock traceable to the May 2018 secondary offering of the Company’s common stock by certain of its shareholders. The complaint alleges that, during the Class Period, the defendants disseminated materially false and misleading statements and/or concealed or recklessly disregarded material adverse facts. The complaint alleges claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and with respect to the secondary offering, under Sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The plaintiffs sought to recover unspecified damages on behalf of the class members. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on October 31, 2019. On November 30, 2020, the Court granted the Company’s motion to dismiss in full and dismissed the complaint. The plaintiffs did not appeal.

Between March and July 2019, the Company received shareholder litigation demands alleging breaches of fiduciary duties by certain current and former Company directors and executive officers, to the alleged injury of the Company. The allegations in the demands relate to those contained in the dismissed securities class action litigation. In response to the demands, pursuant to Virginia law, the Board of Directors has created a special committee to investigate and evaluate the claims made in the demands. In addition, four derivative complaints were filed, each making allegations against certain of the Company’s officers and directors and/or Artal and certain of its affiliates. First, on June 13, 2019, a shareholder derivative complaint was filed in the Southern District of New York against certain of the Company’s officers and directors alleging, among other things, that the defendants breached fiduciary duties to the alleged injury of the Company. The plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the complaint on July 8, 2019 and the Company agreed to treat the complaint as a litigation demand. Second, on July 23, 2019, another shareholder derivative complaint was filed in the Southern District of New York against certain of the Company’s officers and directors alleging, among other things, that the defendants breached fiduciary duties to the alleged injury of the Company. The plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the complaint the same day. Third, on October 25, 2019, another shareholder derivative complaint was filed in the Southern District of New York against certain of the Company’s officers and directors alleging, among other things, that the defendants breached fiduciary duties to the alleged injury of the Company. Finally, on December 16, 2019, a shareholder derivative complaint was filed in New York Supreme Court against certain of the Company’s officers and directors, and Artal and certain of its affiliates, alleging, among other things, that the defendants breached fiduciary duties to the alleged injury of the Company. This action and the derivative action filed October 25, 2019 were initially stayed pending a decision on the defendants’ motion to dismiss the securities class action and all parties agreed to an additional stay until February 25, 2021. The Company believes that these actions are without merit and intends to vigorously defend them.

Member Class Action Matter

In June 2020, a Workshops + Digital (then known as Studio + Digital) member filed a class action complaint against the Company in the Superior Court of California in Ventura County. The complaint was filed on behalf of all Workshops + Digital members nationwide and regards the fees charged for Workshops + Digital memberships since the replacement of in-person workshops with virtual workshops in March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The complaint alleged, among other things, that the Company’s decision to charge its members the full Workshops + Digital membership fee while only providing a virtual workshop experience violated California state consumer protection laws and gave rise to claims for breach of contract, fraud, and other tort causes of action based on the same factual allegations that are the basis for the breach of contract claim. The plaintiff seeks to recover damages plus injunctive relief to enjoin the Company from engaging in similar conduct in the future on behalf of the class members.

On July 30, 2020, the Company filed a notice to remove the matter to the United States District Court for the Central District of California, and per the parties’ stipulation, on August 7, 2020, the case was transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. On September 23, 2020, the Company filed a motion to dismiss all of the plaintiff’s claims with prejudice. At the parties’ September 29, 2020 preliminary conference, the court issued an order permitting the plaintiff to either submit her opposition to the motion to dismiss or file an amended complaint by October 14, 2020. On October 14, 2020, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint with predominantly the same claims. The Company filed another motion to dismiss the matter on November 4, 2020. The plaintiff filed her opposition brief on November 19, 2020, and the Company filed its reply brief on November 25, 2020. The Company believes that this matter is without merit and intends to vigorously defend it.

Other Litigation Matters

Due to the nature of the Company’s activities, it is also, at times, subject to other pending and threatened legal actions that arise out of the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the disposition of any such matters is not expected, individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. However, the results of legal actions cannot be predicted with certainty. Therefore, it is possible that the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or cash flows could be materially adversely affected in any particular period by the unfavorable resolution of one or more legal actions.

Commitments

Minimum commitments under non-cancelable purchase obligations at January 2, 2021 was $28,239, of which $9,378 is due in fiscal 2021, $9,378 is due in fiscal 2022, $7,544 is due in fiscal 2023 and the remaining $1,939 is due in fiscal 2024. See Note 4 for disclosures related to minimum commitments under non-cancelable lease obligations, primarily for office and rental facilities operating leases.