XML 49 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
Contingencies
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
Contingencies 
Contingencies

 

 

11.  Contingencies

 

The Company is involved from time to time in various legal proceedings, regulatory investigations and claims incident to the normal conduct of business, which may include proceedings that are specific to us and others generally applicable to business practices within the industries in which we operate. A substantial legal liability or a significant regulatory action against us could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and on the results of operations in a particular quarter or year.

 

Michael E. Taylor, Kenneth B. Young, individuals, on behalf of themselves individually and on behalf of others similarly situated v. Waddell & Reed, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive; Case No. 09-CV-2909 AJB (WVG); in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.

 

In this action filed December 28, 2009, the Company, along with various of its affiliates, were sued in an individual action, class action and Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) nationwide collective action by two former advisors asserting misclassification of financial advisors as independent contractors instead of employees. Only Waddell & Reed, Inc. remains as a defendant in the case.  Plaintiffs assert claims under the FLSA for minimum and overtime wages, claims under California Labor Code Statutes, and a claim for Unfair Business Practices under the California Business & Professions Code.  Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief and monetary damages.  Plaintiffs have moved to conditionally certify the purported FLSA collective action, asking the court to allow certain financial advisors the opportunity to opt in to the lawsuit.  The Company has opposed this request. If the court conditionally certifies the FLSA collective action, certain current and former financial advisors will be provided written notice of the lawsuit and offered the opportunity to participate as plaintiffs.  If conditional certification is granted, the scope and cost of the case would increase, particularly where there is a high participation rate by those notified.  The Company intends to continue vigorously contesting plaintiffs’ claims.

 

In the opinion of management, the ultimate resolution and outcome of this matter is uncertain.  At this stage of the litigation, the Company is unable to estimate the expense or exposure, if any, that it may represent.   The ultimate resolution of this matter, or an adverse determination against the Company, could have a material adverse impact on the financial position and results of operations of the Company.  However, this possible impact is unknown and not reasonably determinable; therefore, no liability has been recorded in the consolidated financial statements.