Note 1

The Company:

Background

STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. (and its subsidiary in India) ("STRATA" or "we" or the "Company") is a medical technology company focused on the therapeutic and aesthetic dermatology market. STRATA sales include the following products: XTRAC^® laser and VTRAC^® excimer lamp systems utilized in the treatment of psoriasis, vitiligo and various other skin conditions; the STRATAPEN^® MicroSystem, a micropigmentation device; and Nordlys, a multi-technology aesthetic laser device for treating vascular and pigmented lesions.

The XTRAC is an ultraviolet light excimer laser system utilized to treat psoriasis, vitiligo and other skin diseases. The XTRAC received FDA clearance in 2000. As of December 31, 2017, there were 753 XTRAC systems placed in dermatologists' offices in the United States under the Company's recurring revenue business model. The XTRAC systems employed under the recurring revenue model generate revenue on a per procedure basis or include a fixed payment for an agreed upon period not to exceed an agreed upon number of treatments. The per-procedure charge is inclusive of the use of the system and the services provided by the Company to the customer which includes system maintenance, and other services. The VTRAC Excimer Lamp system, offered in addition to the XTRAC system internationally, provides targeted therapeutic efficacy demonstrated by excimer technology with a lamp system.

Effective March 1, 2017, the Company entered into an agreement to license the exclusive US distribution rights for the Ellipse family of products, Nordlys, from Ellipse USA ("Ellipse") through December 31, 2019. The agreement was to be renewed if certain minimum purchase requirements were achieved and an approximate $33 monthly license fee was paid, for a contractual total license fee of $1.1 million over the Initial Term. On October 26, 2017, by mutual agreement of the three parties involved in the transaction, the Company, Ellipse USA and the manufacturer Ellipse A/S, cancelled the agreement with Ellipse USA retroactively effective to August 9, 2017, and the Company entered into two new agreements. Under the new agreements the Company will have the exclusive US distribution rights for the Ellipse family of products, Nordlys, from Ellipse A/S, the Danish manufacturer, through August 9, 2020. If certain sales targets are met, the new agreement will automatically be extended for two additional years. Under the terms of the new agreements, the Company will be the exclusive US distributor of Ellipse lasers and will pay to Ellipse USA a monthly license fee of $10 through August 9, 2020, in addition to commissions for each system sold. The license fee amounts to approximately $355 over the Initial Term with a present value as of the effective date of the agreement of $286. As a result of the termination of the old agreement and the signing of the new agreements the Company reversed the intangible asset and corresponding liability recorded on March 1, 2017 (which resulted in a $40 gain) and recorded the distribution rights at the present value of the payments under the new agreements. See Note 5, Intangible Assets, net, for additional information.

Effective February 1, 2017, the Company entered into an exclusive OEM distribution agreement with Esthetic Education, LLC to be the exclusive marketer and seller of private label versions of the SkinStylus MicroSystem and associated parts under the name of STRATAPen. This three-year agreement allows for two one-year extensions.

Effective April 6, 2017, the Company completed a reverse stock split of its common stock at a ratio of 1-for-5 shares, and all data on common stock and equivalents was retroactively adjusted to be shown herein as reflective of this reverse stock split.

Basis of Presentation:

Accounting Principles

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("US GAAP").

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Reclassification

Certain reclassifications from the prior year presentation have been made to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications did not have material impact on the Company's equity, net assets, results of operations or cash flows.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates and be based on events different from those assumptions. As of December 31, 2017, the more significant estimates include (1) revenue recognition, in regards to deferred revenues and the contract term and valuation allowances of accounts receivable, (2) the inputs used in the impairment analyses of intangible assets and goodwill, (3) the estimated useful lives of intangible assets and property and equipment, (4) the inputs used in determining the fair value of equity-based awards, (5) the valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets (6) the fair value of financial instruments, including derivative instruments, and (7) the inventory reserves.

Revenue Recognition

In the Dermatology Recurring Procedures Segment the Company has two types of arrangements for its phototherapy treatment equipment as follows: (i) the Company places its lasers in a physician's office at no charge to the physician, and generally charges the physician a fee for an agreed upon number of treatments; or (ii) the Company places its lasers in a physician's office and charges the physician a fixed fee for a specified period of time not to exceed an agreed upon number of treatments; if number is exceeded additional fees will have to be paid.

For the purposes of U.S. GAAP only, these two types of arrangements are treated as short term operating leases. While these are not contractually operating leases these are viewed as operating leases for accounting purposes since in these arrangements the Company provides the customers the rights to use the treatment equipment and the customers control physical access to the treatment equipment while controlling the utility and output of such equipment during the term of the arrangement. For the first type of arrangement, fees are recognized as revenue over the contract term, which equates to the usage period of the agreed upon number of treatments, as the treatments are being used. For the second type of arrangement fees are recognized as revenue ratably on a straight line basis over the term period specified in the agreement. Contingent amounts that will be paid only if customer exceeds the agreed upon number of treatments are recognized only when such treatments are being exceeded and used. Pre-paid amounts are recorded in deferred revenue and recognized as revenue over the lease term in the patterns described above.

The fee charged is inclusive of the use of the system and the services provided by the Company to the customer which include system maintenance and other services. The Company considers the other service and support elements in the contract to be perfunctory and inconsequential.

In the Dermatology Procedures Equipment segment the Company sells its products internationally through a distributor, and domestically directly to a physician. For the product sales, the Company recognizes revenues when the following four criteria have been met: (i) the product has been delivered and the Company has no significant remaining obligations; (ii) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (iii) the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collection is reasonably assured. Revenues from product sales are recorded net of provisions for expected returns and cash discounts.

The Company ships most of its products FOB shipping point, although from time to time certain customers, for example governmental customers, will be granted FOB destination terms. Among the factors the Company takes into account when determining the proper time at which to recognize revenue are (i) when title to the goods transfers and (ii) when the risk of loss transfers. Shipments to distributors or physicians that do not fully satisfy the collection criteria are recognized when invoiced amounts are fully paid or fully assured and included in deferred revenues until that time.

The Company records co-pay reimbursements made to patients receiving laser treatments as a reduction of revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2016 the Company reclassified such reimbursements in the amount of $1,050 from selling and marketing expenses to revenues. The Company has determined that such reclassification did not have a material impact to the consolidated financial statements, quantitatively and qualitatively.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company invests its excess cash in highly liquid short-term investments and credit card transactions with settlement terms of less than five days. The Company considers short-term investments that are purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Proceeds due from credit card transactions were $353 and $60 as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Cash and cash equivalents consisted of cash and money market accounts at December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Accounts Receivable

The majority of the Company's accounts receivable are due from physicians, distributors (international) and other entities in the medical field. Accounts receivable are most often due within 30 to 90 days and are stated at amounts due from customers net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Accounts outstanding longer than the contractual payment terms are considered past due. The Company determines its allowance for doubtful accounts by considering a number of factors, including the length of time trade accounts receivable are past due, the Company's previous loss history, the customer's current ability to pay its obligation to the Company and available information about their credit risk, and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. The Company writes off accounts receivable when they are considered uncollectible, and payments subsequently received on such receivables are credited to the bad debt expense. The Company does not recognize interest accruing on accounts receivable past due. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $172 and $135 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined to be purchased cost for raw materials and the production cost (materials, labor and indirect manufacturing cost, including sub-contracted work components) for work-in-process and finished goods. For the Company's products, cost is determined on the first-in, first-out method. Throughout the laser manufacturing process, the related production costs are recorded within inventory. Work-in-process is immaterial, given the typically short manufacturing cycle, and therefore is disclosed in conjunction with raw materials.

The Company's equipment for the treatment of skin disorders (e.g. the XTRAC) will either (i) be placed in a physician's office and remain the property of the Company (at which date such equipment is transferred to property and equipment) or (ii) be sold to distributors or physicians directly. The cost to build a laser, whether for sale or for placement, is accumulated in inventory.

Reserves for slow moving and obsolete inventories are provided based on historical experience and product demand. Management evaluates the adequacy of these reserves periodically based on forecasted sales and market trends. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, reserves on inventory were $234 and $257, respectively.

Property, Equipment and Depreciation

Property and equipment are recorded at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Excimer lasers-in-service are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of five years. For other property and equipment, depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, primarily three to seven years for computer hardware and software, furniture and fixtures, and machinery and equipment. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the useful lives or lease terms. Expenditures for major renewals and betterments to property and equipment are capitalized, while expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged as an expense as incurred. Upon retirement or disposition, the applicable property amounts are deducted from the accounts and any gain or loss is recorded in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Useful lives are determined based upon an estimate of either physical or economic obsolescence or both.

Management evaluates the realizability of property and equipment based on estimates of undiscounted future cash flows over the remaining useful life of the asset. If the amount of such estimated undiscounted future cash flows is less than the net book value of the asset, the asset is written down to fair value.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist of core technology, product technology, customer relationships, trademarks and distribution rights. Intangible assets are amortized over the period of estimated benefit using the straight-line method and estimated useful lives ranging from three to ten years. (See Note 5, Intangible Assets, net).

Accounting for the Impairment of Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in a business combination. The Company evaluates the carrying value of goodwill annually in December of each year in connection with the annual budgeting and forecast process and also between annual evaluations if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit to which goodwill was allocated to below its carrying amount. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to: (1) a significant adverse change in legal factors or in business climate, (2) unanticipated competition, or (3) an adverse action or assessment by a regulator. When evaluating goodwill for impairment, we may first perform an assessment qualitatively whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit's carrying amount exceeds its fair value, referred to as a "step zero" approach. Subsequently (if necessary after step zero), an entity should perform its goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. Under Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2017-04, "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment," Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test has been eliminated and goodwill impairment is measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the reporting unit over its fair value. Early application is permitted. No goodwill impairment was identified in the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Intangibles

Long-lived assets, such as property and equipment, and definite-lived intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the undiscounted cash flows attributable to the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its undiscounted cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value.

Functional Currency

The currency of the primary economic environment in which the operations of the Company are conducted is the US dollar ("$" or "dollars"). Substantially all of the Company's revenues are derived in dollars or in other currencies linked to the dollar. Purchases of most materials and components are carried out in, or linked to the dollar.

For foreign currency transactions, the exchange rates applicable to the relevant transaction dates are used. Transaction gains or losses arising from changes in the exchange rates are carried to financing income or expenses.

Assets and liabilities of the foreign subsidiary, whose functional currency is its local currency are translated from its functional currency to U.S. dollars at the balance sheet date exchange rate. Income and expense items are translated at the average rate of exchange prevailing during the year. Translation adjustments are reflected in the consolidated balance sheets as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company measures and discloses fair value in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ("ASC Topic 820"). ASC Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework and gives guidance regarding the methods used for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions there exists a three-tier fair-value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

	•	Level 1 – unadjusted quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
	•	Level 2 – pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets that are directly observable for the asset or liability or indirectly observable through corroboration with observable market data.
	•	Level 3 – pricing inputs are unobservable for the asset or liability and only used when there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date. The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation. Fair value is determined using comparable market transactions and other valuation methodologies, adjusted as appropriate for liquidity, credit, market and/or other risk factors

This hierarchy requires the Company to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value.

The Company's recurring fair value measurements at December 31, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:

	Fair Value as of December 31, 2017		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Liabilities:
Warrant liability (Note 11)	$	3	$	-	$	-	$	3

	Fair Value as of December 31, 2016		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Liabilities:
Warrant liability (Note 11)	$	105	$	-	$	-	$	105

The fair value of cash and cash equivalents are based on their respective demand value, which are equal to the carrying value. The fair value of derivative warrant liabilities is estimated using option pricing models that are based on the fair value of the Company's common stock as well as assumptions for volatility, remaining expected life, and the risk-free interest rate. The derivative warrant liabilities are the only recurring Level 3 fair value measures. The carrying value of all other short-term monetary assets and liabilities is estimated to be approximate to their fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. As of December 31, 2017, the Company assessed its long-term debt (including the current portion) and determined that the fair value of total debt approximated its book value due to the rate on the debt being at market. As of December 31, 2016, the Company assessed its convertible debentures and long-term debt and determined that the fair value of total debt was $20,082.

Several of the warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 have non-standard terms as they relate to a fundamental transaction and require a net-cash settlement upon change in control of the Company. Prior to December 31, 2016,other warrants contained full ratchet provisions that would reduce the exercise price of the warrants in the event of a transaction resulting in the issuance of equity below the existing exercise price of the warrants. All such warrants are classified as derivatives. As such they are recorded at their fair value using a binomial option pricing model and continue to be recorded at their respective fair value at each subsequent balance sheet date until such terms expire. See Note 11, Warrants, for additional discussion.

Accrued Warranty Costs

The Company offers a standard warranty on product sales generally for a one to two-year period, however, the Company has offered longer warranty periods, ranging from three to four years, in order to meet competition or meet customer demands. The Company provides for the estimated cost of the future warranty claims on the date the product is sold. Total accrued warranty is included in Other Accrued Liabilities and Other liabilities on the balance sheet. The activity in the warranty accrual during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 is summarized as follows:

	December 31,
	2017			2016

Accrual at beginning of year	$	115		$	226
Additions charged to warranty expense		161			196
Expiring warranties/claimed satisfied		(98	)		(307	)
Total		178			115
Less: current portion		(109	)		(102	)
Total long-term accrued warranty costs	$	69		$	13

Product Development Costs

Costs of research, new product development and product redesign are charged to expenses as incurred in engineering and product development in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are charged to expenses as incurred. Advertising expenses amounted to approximately $1,434 and $3,339 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities, as well as on net operating loss carryforwards, and are measured using enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences reverse. Any resulting net deferred tax assets are evaluated for recoverability and, accordingly, a valuation allowance is provided when it is not more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will be realized.

The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions in accordance with an amendment to ASC Topic 740-10, Income Taxes (Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes), which clarified the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. This amendment provides that the tax effects from an uncertain tax position can be recognized in the financial statements only if the position is "more-likely-than-not" to be sustained were it to be challenged by a taxing authority. The assessment of the tax position is based solely on the technical merits of the position, without regard to the likelihood that the tax position may be challenged. If an uncertain tax position meets the "more-likely-than-not" threshold, the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50% likely to be recognized upon ultimate settlement with the taxing authority is recorded. The Company has no uncertain tax positions.

Concentration of Credit Risks

Financial instruments which subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company deposits cash and cash equivalents in major financial institutions in the US. The Company performs periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of these institutions. The Company is of the opinion that the credit risk in respect of these balances is immaterial. In addition, the Company performs an ongoing credit evaluation and establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon factors surrounding the credit risk of customers (see also Accounts receivable above).

With the exception of the Company's international distributor, as described in Note 17, Significant Customer Concentrations, the balance of the Company's trade receivables do not represent a substantial concentration of credit risk. Most of the Company's sales are generated in North America, to a large number of customers.

Management periodically evaluates the collectability of the trade receivables to determine the amounts that are doubtful of collection and determine a proper allowance for doubtful accounts.

Earnings Per Share

The Company calculates net income (loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings per Share. Under ASC 260, basic net income (loss) per common share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period and excludes dilution for potentially dilutive securities. Diluted earnings per share gives effect to dilutive options, warrants and other potential common shares outstanding during the period.

The Company's Series C Preferred Shares are subordinate to all other securities at the same subordination level as common stock and they participate in all dividends and distributions declared or paid with respect to common stock of the Company, on an as-converted basis. Therefore, the Series C Preferred Shares meet the definition of common stock under ASC 260. Earnings per share is presented for each class of security meeting the definition of common stock. The net loss is allocated to each class of security meeting the definition of common stock based on their contractual terms.

The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted net loss per share by each class of security for the year ended December 31, 2017:

	Year ended December 31, 2017
	Common stock	Series C Preferred stock

Net loss	($ 7,747)	($ 11,084)

Weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period	2,713,782	10,444

Basic and Diluted net loss per share	($ 2.85)	($ 1,061.25)

For the year ended December 31, 2017, diluted net loss per common share and Series C Preferred share is equal to the basic net loss per common share and Series C Preferred share, respectively, since all potentially dilutive securities are anti-dilutive. The gain on the change in fair value of the warrant liability was considered when calculating the diluted earnings per share and was deemed to be antidilutive.

For the year ended December 31, 2016 diluted earnings per common share are computed by the numerator effected by the gain on the change in fair value of the warrant liability and the denominator is increased to include the number of additional potential common shares from the warrants underlying the warrant liability.

Diluted earnings per common share were calculated using the following net loss and weighted average shares outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2016:

		Year Ended December 31, 2016

Net loss		($ 3,335)
Gain on the change in fair value of the warrant liability		(5,396)
Diluted loss		($ 8,731)

Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding:
Basic number of common shares outstanding		2,119,014
Dilutive effect of warrants		196,701
Diluted number of common and common stock equivalent shares outstanding		2,315,715

The weighted average of potential common stock equivalents outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 consist of common stock equivalents of common stock purchase warrants, senior secured convertible debentures, convertible preferred stock and common stock options, which are summarized as follows:

		Year Ended December 31,
	2017		2016
Common stock equivalents of convertible debentures	6,622,821		9,231,570
Common stock purchase warrants	2,406,625		3,739,037
Common stock equivalents of convertible Preferred B stock	289,462		496,824
Common stock options	876,373		613,773
Total	10,195,281		14,081,204

The convertible debenture shares, warrant shares (except for those related to the gain during the year ended December 31, 2016) and option shares were excluded from net loss per dilutive share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation. Under the fair value recognition provision of this statement, share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as operating expense over the requisite service period of the stock award on a straight line basis. Performance-based awards are recognized only when it is probable that the vesting conditions will be met.

Adoption of New Accounting Standards

In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. Under the current guidance, there are three elements of business: inputs, processes, and outputs. While an integrated set of assets and activities (collectively, a "set") that is a business usually has outputs, outputs are not required to be present. In addition, all the inputs and processes that a seller uses in operating a set are not required if market participants can acquire the set and continue to produce outputs, for example, by integrating the acquired set with their own inputs and processes. The new guidance provides a screen to determine when a set is not a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. For public business entities, the guidance is effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years, but can be adopted early. The Company has adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2017 and has applied the rules with its sub-distribution license with Ellipse and concluded that this transaction did not meet the definition of a business. As such, it has been accounted for as an asset acquisition. See Note 5, Intangible Assets, net.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (Topic 718), to simplify various aspects of the accounting and presentation of share-based payments, including the income tax effects of awards and forfeiture assumptions. The new guidance permits to elect to account for forfeitures as they occur. The Company has made this election upon the adoption of this standard. The guidance became effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The adoption of this ASU did not have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, The FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (Topic 330) ("ASU 2015-11"). ASU 2015-11 outlines that inventory within the scope of its guidance be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Prior to the issuance of ASU 2015-11, inventory was measured at the lower of cost or market (where market was defined as replacement cost, with a ceiling of net realizable value and floor of net realizable value less a normal profit margin). For a public entity, the amendments in ASU 2015-11 are effective, in a prospective manner, for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period (the first quarter of fiscal year 2017 for the Company). The adoption of this ASU did not have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In July 2017, the FASB issued a two-part ASU 2017-11, "(Part I) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features, (Part II) Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Non-controlling Interests with a Scope Exception." For public business entities, the amendments in Part 1 of ASU 2017-11 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted for all entities, including adoption in an interim period. The amendments in Part 2 of ASU 2017-11 do not require any transition guidance because those amendments do not have an accounting effect. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The new guidance eliminated Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test which was required in computing the implied fair value of goodwill. Instead, under the new amendments, an entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value, however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. If applicable, an entity should consider income tax effects from any tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit when measuring the goodwill impairment loss. The amendments in this guidance are effective for public business entities for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 with early adoption permitted after January 1, 2017. As the Company has not identified a goodwill impairment loss, currently this guidance does not have an impact on the Company's financial statements.

In February 2016 the FASB issued ASU 2016-02: Leases. The ASU introduces a lessee model that results in most leases impacting the balance sheet. Under ASU 2016-02, lessees will be required to recognize for all leases with terms longer than 12 months, at the commencement date of the lease, a lease liability, which is a lessee's obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease measured on a discounted basis, and a right-to-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee's right to use or control the use of a specified asset for the lease term. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition. Also, the new standard aligns many of the underlying principles of the new lessor model with those in ASC 606, the FASB's new revenue recognition model. The update is Effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. While we continue to evaluate the effect of adopting this guidance on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures, we expect our operating leases, as disclosed in Note 10, will be subject to the new standard. We will recognize right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets upon adoption, which will increase our total assets and liabilities. With regard to the Company's revenue from short-term leases, we do not expect the new standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, The FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). ASU 2014-09 outlines a single comprehensive model to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. ASU 2014-09 also requires entities to disclose sufficient information, both quantitative and qualitative, to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The Company will adopt this ASU effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method with a cumulative adjustment that will increase its accumulated deficit by approximately $195. The cumulative adjustment will primarily relate to the promise to provide service type warranties related to sales of dermatology procedures equipment. A portion of the transaction price of equipment sold with these service type warranties will be allocated to such warranties based on their stand-alone selling price, and the Company will begin to recognize revenue from these service type warranties ratably over the warranty term. Under current guidance only separately priced extended warranties are required to be accounted for as separate elements and be recognized over the warranty term. Other than the above change related to warranties the Company does not expect the standard to have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.