10-K/A

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K/A

(Amendment No. 1)

(Mark One)
	ý	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
OR
	o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 001-14157

TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	36-2669023
(State or other jurisdiction	(IRS Employer Identification No.)
of incorporation or organization)
30 North LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois	60602
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip code)
Registrant’s Telephone Number: (312) 630-1900
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Shares, $.01 par value	American Stock Exchange
7.60% Series A Notes due 2041	New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  o  No ý

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicated by checkmark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).

Yes  ý  No o

As of June 30, 2004, the aggregate market values of the registrant’s Common Shares, Series A Common Shares and Preferred Shares held by non-affiliates were approximately $2.8 billion, $19.7 million and $4.7 million, respectively. For purposes hereof, it was assumed that each director, executive officer and holder of 10% or more of the voting power of TDS and U.S. Cellular is an affiliate. The closing price of the Common Shares on June 30, 2004, was $71.20, as reported by the American Stock Exchange. Because no market exists for the Series A Common Shares and Preferred Shares, the registrant has assumed for purposes hereof that (i) each Series A Common Share has a market value equal to one Common Share because the Series A Common Shares were initially issued by the registrant in exchange for Common Shares on a one-for-one basis and are convertible on a share-for-share basis into Common Shares, (ii) each nonconvertible Preferred Share has a market value of $100 because each of such shares had a stated value of $100 when issued, and (iii) each convertible Preferred Share has a value of $71.20 times the number of Common Shares into which it was convertible on June 30, 2004.

The number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of January 31, 2005, is 51,054,094 Common Shares, $.01 par value, and 6,425,774 Series A Common Shares, $.01 par value.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Those sections or portions of the registrant’s 2004 Annual Report to Shareholders and of the registrant’s Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement for its 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 5, 2005, described in the cross reference sheet and table of contents attached hereto are incorporated by reference into Part II and III of this report.

Explanatory Note

Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. (“TDS”) is filing this Amendment No. 1 to its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, which was originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 11, 2005 (“Original Form 10-K”), to amend Item 1 “Business,” Item 2 “Properties,” Item 6 “Selected Financial Data,” Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” (“MD&A”), Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” Item 9A “Controls and Procedures,” Item 9B “Other Information” and Item 15 “Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.”

As discussed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, on November 9, 2005, TDS and its audit committee concluded that TDS would amend its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 to restate its financial statements and financial information for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, including quarterly information for 2004 and 2003, and certain selected financial data for the years 2001 and 2000.  TDS and its audit committee also concluded that TDS would amend its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periods ended March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2005 to restate the financial statements and financial information included therewith.

The restatement adjustments principally correct items that were recorded in the financial statements previously but not in the proper periods and certain income tax, interest income and consolidation errors. Correction of the errors, with the exception of income taxes discussed below, individually did not have a material impact on income before income taxes and minority interest, net income or earnings per share; however, when aggregated, the items were considered to be material. The restatement adjustments to correct income tax accounting had a material impact individually on net income and earnings per share in prior periods. The restated financial statements are adjusted to record certain obligations in the periods such obligations were incurred, correct the timing of the reversal of certain tax liabilities, correct the consolidation of an 80% owned subsidiary, and record revenues in the periods such revenues were earned. The adjustments are described below.

•      Income taxes – In the restatement, TDS corrected its income tax expense, federal and state taxes payable, liabilities accrued for tax contingencies, deferred income tax assets and liabilities and related disclosures for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 for items identified based on a reconciliation of income tax accounts.  The reconciliation compared amounts used for financial reporting purposes to the amounts used in the preparation of the income tax returns, and took into consideration the results of federal and state income tax audits and the resulting book/tax basis differences which generate deferred tax assets and liabilities.  In addition, a review of the state deferred income tax rates used to establish deferred income tax assets and liabilities identified errors in the state income tax rate used which resulted in adjustments to correct the amount of deferred income tax assets and liabilities recorded for temporary differences between the timing of when certain transactions are recognized for financial and income tax reporting.

•Federal universal service fund (“USF”) contributions – In 2004 and 2003, Universal Service Administrative Company (“USAC”) billings to U.S. Cellular for USF contributions were based on estimated revenues reported to USAC by U.S. Cellular in accordance with USAC’s established procedures. However, U.S. Cellular’s actual liability for USF is based upon its actual revenues and USAC’s established procedures provide a method to adjust U.S. Cellular’s estimated liability to its actual liability. In the first six months of 2005 and the full years of 2004 and 2003, U.S. Cellular’s actual revenues exceeded estimated revenues reported to USAC on an interim basis. As a result, additional amounts were due to USAC in 2005 and 2004 based on U.S. Cellular’s annual report filings. Such additional amounts were incorrectly expensed when the invoices were received from USAC rather than at the time the obligation was incurred. In the third quarter of 2005, U.S. Cellular corrected its accounting for USF contributions to record expense reflecting the estimated obligation incurred based on actual revenues reported during the period. Accordingly, in the restatement, TDS has adjusted previously reported USF contributions expense by U.S. Cellular to reflect the estimated liability incurred during the period.

•Customer contract termination fees – In the fourth quarter of 2003, U.S. Cellular revised its business practices related to the billing of contract termination fees charged when a customer disconnected service prior to the end of the customer’s contract. This change resulted in an increase in amounts billed to customers and revenues even though a high percentage of the amounts billed were deemed uncollectible. At the time of the change in business practice, U.S. Cellular incorrectly recorded revenues related to such fees at the time of billing, as generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) would preclude revenue recognition if the receivable is not reasonably assured of collection. In the first quarter of 2005, U.S. Cellular corrected its accounting to record revenues related to such fees only upon collection, in recognition of the fact that the collectibility of the revenues was not reasonably assured at the time of billing. In the restatement, TDS made adjustments to properly reflect U.S. Cellular’s revenues for such fees upon collection beginning on October 1, 2003.

•Leases and contracts – TDS and U.S. Cellular had entered into certain operating leases (as both lessee and lessor) that provide for specific scheduled increases in payments over the lease term. In the third quarter of 2004, TDS made adjustments for the cumulative effect which were not considered to be material to either that quarter or to prior periods to correct its accounting and to recognize revenues and expenses under such agreements on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 13, “Accounting for Leases,” as amended, and related pronouncements. In addition, the accounting for certain other long-term contracts, for which a cumulative effect adjustment was made in the first quarter of 2005, was corrected to recognize expenses in the appropriate periods. The restatement adjustments reverse the cumulative amounts previously recorded in the third quarter of 2004 and the first quarter of 2005, and properly record such revenues and expenses on a straight-line basis in the appropriate periods.

•Promotion rebates – From time to time, U.S. Cellular’s sales promotions include rebates on sales of handsets to customers. In such cases, U.S. Cellular reduces revenues and records a liability at the time of sale reflecting an estimate of rebates to be paid under the promotion. Previously, the accrued liability was not adjusted on a timely basis upon expiration of the promotion to reflect the actual amount of rebates paid based upon information available at the date the financial statements were issued. In the restatement, TDS has corrected revenues and accrued liabilities to reflect the impacts associated with promotion rebates in the appropriate periods.

•Operations of consolidated partnerships managed by a third party – Historically, U.S. Cellular recorded the results of operations of certain consolidated partnerships managed by a third party on an estimated basis, and adjusted such estimated results to the actual results upon receipt of financial statements in the following quarter. However, GAAP requires that the actual amounts be used. In the restatement, TDS has corrected its financial statements to recognize results of operations in the appropriate period based on the partnerships’ actual results of operations reported for such periods.

•Investment income from entities accounted for by the equity method – Historically, U.S. Cellular recorded an estimate each quarter of its proportionate share of net income (loss) from certain entities accounted for by the equity method, and adjusted such estimate to the actual share of net income (loss) upon receipt of financial statements in the following quarter. However, GAAP requires that the actual amounts be used. In the restatement, TDS has corrected its financial statements to recognize investment income in the appropriate period based on the entities’ actual net income (loss) reported for such periods.

•      Historically, TDS had not fully consolidated its 80%-owned subsidiary, Suttle Straus, to present the operating results of such subsidiary in revenues, cost of service, selling, general and administrative expenses and depreciation. Previously, the net operating results of the subsidiary were included in other income (expense).  However, the non-operating portion of the income statement of Suttle Straus was properly presented. The restatement correctly consolidated the results of Suttle Straus. Also, property, plant and equipment was corrected to properly include Suttle Straus’ fixed assets.  Previously, the balances were included in other assets and deferred charges. In addition, certain intercompany elimination entries between TDS, U.S. Cellular, TDS Telecom and Suttle Straus have been recorded.

•Revenue and cost of service accruals – TDS Telecom reviewed accruals in the first and second quarter of 2004 and determined that an adjustment was required to record unbilled revenue related to its competitive local exchange carrier that were not previously recorded. TDS Telecom also reduced cost of service accruals related to long-distance service as a result of shifting long-distance traffic to a second provider. In the restatement, the adjustments reverse the cumulative amounts previously recorded in the first and second quarters of 2004, and record such revenues and expenses in the appropriate periods.

•      Consolidated statements of cash flows – In the restatement, the classification of cash distributions received from unconsolidated entities has been corrected to properly reflect cash received, which represents a return on investment in the unconsolidated entities, as cash flows from operating activities; previously, the cash received on such investments was classified as cash flows from investing activities. Also, the classification of certain noncash stock-based compensation expense has been corrected to properly reflect such noncash expense as an adjustment to cash flows from operating activities; previously, such expense was classified as cash flows from financing activities.

•Interest income – In the restatement, TDS corrected its accounting for recording interest income earned by its subsidiaries through a cash management agreement for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002. TDS subsidiaries participating in the cash management agreement had not recorded an accrual to increase cash and interest income for their portion of the interest income earned. The correcting entries increased cash and interest income for each period presented.

•Other items – In addition to the adjustments described above, TDS recorded a number of other adjustments to correct and record revenues and expenses in the periods in which such revenues and expenses were earned or incurred. These adjustments were not significant, either individually or in aggregate.

In connection with the restatement, TDS concluded that certain material weaknesses existed in its internal control over financial reporting. See Part II – Item 9A “Controls and Procedures.”

For the convenience of the reader, this Form 10-K/A sets forth the Original Form 10-K, as amended hereby, in its entirety.  However, this Form 10-K/A amends and restates only Items 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9A, 9B and 15 of the Original Form 10-K, in each case solely as a result of and to reflect the adjustments discussed above and more fully in Note 1 of the accompanying financial statements, and no other information in the Original Form 10-K is amended hereby. The foregoing items have not been updated to reflect other events occurring after the filing of the Original Form 10-K, or to modify or update those disclosures affected by other subsequent events.  In particular, forward-looking statements included in the Form 10-K/A represented management’s views as of the date of filing of the Original Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 on March 11, 2005. Such forward-looking statements should not be assumed to be accurate as of any future date. TDS undertakes no duty to update such information whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

As required by Rule 12b-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, new certifications by TDS’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer are being filed with this Form 10-K/A as Exhibits 31.1, 31.2, 32.1 and 32.2.  In addition, Exhibits 23.1 and 23.2 have been amended to contain currently-dated consents of independent registered public accounting firms.

CROSS REFERENCE SHEET

AND

TABLE OF CONTENTS

			Page Number or Reference (1)
Part I
	Item 1.	Business	3
	Item 2.	Properties	50
	Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	50
	Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	50
Part II
	Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	51	(2)
	Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	51	(3)
	Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	52	(4)
	Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	52	(5)
	Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	52	(6)
	Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	52
	Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	52
	Item 9B.	Other Information	55
Part III
	Item 10.	Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant	56	(7)
	Item 11.	Executive Compensation	56	(8)
	Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	56	(9)
	Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	56	(10)
	Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	56	(11)
Part IV
	Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	57

(1)Parenthetical references are to information incorporated by reference from the registrant’s Exhibit 13, which includes portions of its Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2004 (“Annual Report”) and from the registrant’s Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement for its 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 5, 2005 (“Proxy Statement”).

(2)Annual Report sections entitled “TDS Stock and Dividend Information” and “Consolidated Quarterly Information (Unaudited).”

(3)Annual Report section entitled “Selected Consolidated Financial Data.”

(4)Annual Report section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

(5)Annual Report section entitled “Market Risk.”

(6)Annual Report sections entitled “Consolidated Statements of Operations,” “Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows,” “Consolidated Balance Sheets,” “Consolidated Statements of Common Stockholders’ Equity,” “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,” “Consolidated Quarterly Information (Unaudited),” “Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” and “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”

(7)Proxy Statement sections entitled “Election of Directors,” “Executive Officers” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.”

(8)Proxy Statement section entitled “Executive Compensation,” except for the information specified in Item 402(a)(8) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

(9)Proxy Statement sections entitled “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters” and “Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans.”

(10)Proxy Statement section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”

(11)Proxy Statement section entitled “Fees Paid to Principal Accountants.”

2

Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
30 NORTH LASALLE STREET, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60602
TELEPHONE (312) 630-1900

PART I

Item 1.  Business

Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. (“TDS”), is a diversified telecommunications service company with wireless telephone and wireline telephone operations. At December 31, 2004, TDS served approximately 6.1 million customers in 36 states, including 4,945,000 wireless telephone customers and 1,157,200 wireline telephone equivalent access lines. United States Cellular Corporation (“U.S. Cellular”) provided 76% of TDS’s consolidated revenues and 83% of consolidated operating income in 2004. TDS Telecom provided 24% of consolidated revenues and 17% of consolidated operating income in 2004. Suttle Straus provided less than 1% of consolidated revenues and consolidated operating income in 2004. TDS’s business strategy is to expand its existing operations through internal growth and acquisitions and to explore and develop other telecommunications businesses that management believes will utilize TDS expertise in customer focused telecommunications services.

TDS conducts substantially all of its wireless operations through U.S. Cellular. At December 31, 2004, TDS owned 82.0% of the combined total of the outstanding Common Shares and Series A Common Shares of U.S. Cellular and controlled 95.9% of the combined voting power of both classes of common stock. U.S. Cellular Common Shares are traded on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol “USM.” At December 31, 2004, U.S. Cellular provided wireless telephone service to 4,945,000 customers through the operations of 175 majority-owned (“consolidated”) wireless licenses throughout the United States. Since 1985, when U.S. Cellular began providing wireless service in Knoxville, Tennessee and Tulsa, Oklahoma, U.S. Cellular has expanded its wireless networks and customer service operations to cover six market areas in 27 states as of December 31, 2004. Through a 2003 exchange transaction, U.S. Cellular has rights to wireless licenses covering territories in two additional states and has the rights to commence service in those licensed areas in the future. The wireless licenses that U.S. Cellular currently includes in its consolidated operations cover a total population of more than one million in each market area, including its Midwest/Southwest market area, which covers a total population of more than 31 million, and one market area which covers a total population of more than five million.

TDS conducts its wireline telephone operations through its wholly owned subsidiary, TDS Telecommunications Corporation (“TDS Telecom”). At December 31, 2004, TDS Telecom served 1,157,200 equivalent access lines in 30 states through its incumbent local exchange carrier and competitive local exchange carrier telephone companies. An equivalent access line is derived by converting a high capacity data line to an estimated equivalent, in terms of capacity, number of switched access lines. An incumbent local exchange carrier is an independent local telephone company that formerly had the exclusive right and responsibility to provide local transmission and switching services in its designated service territory. TDS Telecom is expanding by offering additional lines of telecommunications products and services to existing customers and through the selective acquisition of local exchange telephone companies serving rural and suburban areas. TDS Telecom has acquired eight telephone companies since the beginning of 2000. These acquisitions added 82,200 equivalent access lines during this five-year period, while internal growth added 64,900 equivalent access lines. TDS Telecom also began offering services as a competitive local exchange carrier in 1998 in certain mid-sized cities which are near existing TDS Telecom incumbent local exchange carrier markets. Competitive local exchange carrier is a term that depicts companies that enter the operating areas of incumbent local exchange telephone companies to offer local exchange and other telephone services. At December 31, 2004, TDS Telecom’s competitive local exchange carriers served 426,800 equivalent access lines in five states.

TDS conducts printing and distribution services through its 80%-owned subsidiary, Suttle Straus.

TDS was incorporated in 1968 and changed its corporate domicile from Iowa to Delaware in 1998. TDS executive offices are located at 30 North LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60602. Its telephone number is 312-630-1900.

3

Available Information

TDS’s website is http://www.teldta.com. Anyone may access, free of charge, through the Investor Relations portion of the website the TDS annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to such reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practical after such material is electronically filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

Special Common Share Proposal

On February 17, 2005, the TDS Board of Directors (the “TDS Board”) unanimously approved a proposal (the “Special Common Share Proposal”), to be submitted to TDS shareholders at a special meeting of shareholders of TDS scheduled for April 11, 2005, to approve an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of TDS to increase the authorized number of Special Common Shares of TDS from 20,000,000 to 165,000,000.

On February 17, 2005, the TDS Board also approved a distribution of one Special Common Share in the form of a stock dividend with respect to each outstanding Common Share and Series A Common Share of TDS (the “Distribution”), which is expected to be effective May 13, 2005 to shareholders of record on April 29, 2005, subject to the approval of the Special Common Share Proposal by shareholders, the effectiveness of the Amendment, and certain other conditions.

Following approval and effectiveness of the Special Common Share Proposal, at some time in the future TDS may possibly offer to issue Special Common Shares in exchange for all of the Common Shares of U.S. Cellular which are not owned by TDS (a “Possible U.S. Cellular Transaction”). TDS currently owns approximately 82% of the shares of common stock of U.S. Cellular. A Possible U.S. Cellular Transaction would cause U.S. Cellular to become a wholly owned subsidiary of TDS. TDS has set no time frame for a Possible U.S. Cellular Transaction and there are no assurances that a transaction will occur.

Reference is made to the proxy statement of TDS filed with the SEC relating to the special meeting scheduled for April 11, 2005 for additional information relating to the foregoing, which is incorporated by reference herein.

4

U.S. Cellular Operations

TDS’s wireless operations are conducted through U.S. Cellular and its subsidiaries. U.S. Cellular provides wireless telephone service to 4,945,000 customers through the operations of 175 majority-owned (“consolidated”) wireless licenses throughout the United States. Since 1985, when it began providing cellular service in Knoxville, Tennessee and Tulsa, Oklahoma, U.S. Cellular has expanded its wireless networks and customer service operations to cover six market areas in 27 states as of December 31, 2004. Through a 2003 exchange transaction, U.S. Cellular has rights to wireless licenses covering territories in two additional states and has the rights to commence service in those licensed areas in the future. The wireless licenses that U.S. Cellular currently includes in its consolidated operations cover a total population of more than one million in each market area, including its Midwest/Southwest market area, which covers a total population of more than 31 million, and one other market area which covers a total population of more than five million.

U.S. Cellular’s ownership interests in wireless licenses include interests in licenses covering 150 cellular metropolitan statistical areas (as designated by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget and used by the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) in designating metropolitan cellular market areas) or rural service areas (as used by the FCC in designating non-metropolitan statistical area cellular market areas) (“cellular licenses”) and 49 personal communications service basic trading areas (used by the FCC in dividing the United States into personal communications service market areas for licenses in Blocks C through F). Of those interests, U.S. Cellular owns controlling interests in 126 cellular licenses and each of the 49 personal communications service basic trading areas. U.S. Cellular also owns rights to acquire controlling interests in 20 additional personal communications service licenses, primarily through an acquisition agreement with AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. (“AT&T Wireless”), now a subsidiary of Cingular Wireless LLC (“Cingular”). In a separate agreement, U.S. Cellular agreed to purchase a controlling interest in one license from Cingular which will be completed during the first half of 2005.

At December 31, 2004, U.S. Cellular is a limited partner in Carroll Wireless, L.P. (“Carroll Wireless”). U.S. Cellular consolidates Carroll Wireless for financial reporting purposes because it is deemed to have a controlling financial interest in Carroll Wireless. Carroll Wireless participated in FCC wireless spectrum Auction 58, in which eligible participants bid on designated personal communication service spectrum licenses. Carroll Wireless did not own any interests in wireless licenses or any other significant assets as of December 31, 2004. As a result of Auction 58, which ended February 15, 2005, Carroll Wireless was a successful bidder for 17 personal communication service licenses in 11 states for a cost of $129.9 million. See “Wireless Systems Development—Auction 58” for further discussion of U.S. Cellular and Carroll Wireless’ obligations pursuant to Auction 58.

U.S. Cellular manages the operations of all but two of the licenses in which it owns a controlling interest; U.S. Cellular has contracted with another wireless operator to manage the operations of the other two licenses. U.S. Cellular includes the operations of each of these two licenses in its consolidated operating revenues and expenses. U.S. Cellular also manages the operations of three additional licenses in which it does not own a controlling interest, through an agreement with the controlling interest holder or holders. U.S. Cellular accounts for its interests in each of these three licenses using the equity method.

The following table summarizes the status of U.S. Cellular’s interests in wireless markets at December 31, 2004. Personal communications service markets are designated as “PCS.”

	Total	Cellular	PCS
Consolidated markets (1)	175	126	49
Consolidated markets to be acquired pursuant to existing agreements (2)	21	1	20
Minority interests accounted for using equity method (3)	19	19	—
Minority interests accounted for using cost method (4)	5	5	—
Total markets to be owned after completion of pending transactions	220	151	69

(1)U.S. Cellular owns a controlling interest in each of the 126 cellular markets and 49 personal communications service markets it included in its consolidated markets at December 31, 2004.

(2)U.S. Cellular owns rights to acquire controlling interests in 20 additional personal communications service licenses, through an acquisition agreement with AT&T Wireless which was closed in August 2003. U.S. Cellular has up to five years from the transaction closing date to exercise its rights to acquire the licenses. In a separate agreement, U.S. Cellular agreed to purchase a controlling interest in one cellular license from Cingular.

5

(3)Represents cellular licenses in which U.S. Cellular owns an interest that is not a controlling financial interest and which are accounted for using the equity method. U.S. Cellular’s investments in these licenses are included in investment in unconsolidated entities in its Balance Sheet and its proportionate share of the net income of these licenses is included in investment income in its Statement of Operations.

(4)Represents cellular licenses in which U.S. Cellular owns an interest that is not a controlling financial interest and which are accounted for using the cost method. U.S. Cellular’s investments in these licenses are included in investment in unconsolidated entities in its Balance Sheet.

Some of the territory covered by the personal communications service licenses U.S. Cellular operates overlaps with territory covered by the cellular licenses it operates. For the purpose of tracking population counts in order to calculate market penetration, when U.S. Cellular acquires a licensed area that overlaps a licensed area it already owns, it does not duplicate the population counts for any overlapping licensed area. Only non-overlapping, incremental population counts are added to the reported amount of total population in the case of an acquisition of a licensed area that overlaps a previously owned licensed area. The incremental population counts that are added in such event are referred to throughout this Form 10-K/A as “incremental” population measurements. Amounts reported in this Form 10-K/A as “total market population” do not duplicate any population counts in the case of any overlapping licensed areas U.S. Cellular owns.

U.S. Cellular owns interests in consolidated wireless licenses which cover a total population of 44.4 million as of December 31, 2004. U.S. Cellular also owns investment interests in wireless licenses which represent 1.7 million population equivalents as of that date. “Population equivalents” represent the population of a wireless licensed area, based on 2003 Claritas estimates, multiplied by the percentage interest that U.S. Cellular owns in an entity licensed to operate such wireless license.

U.S. Cellular believes that it is the seventh largest wireless company in the United States at December 31, 2004, based on internally prepared calculations of the aggregate number of customers in its consolidated markets compared to the number of customers disclosed by other wireless companies in their publicly released information. U.S. Cellular’s business development strategy is to operate controlling interests in wireless licenses in areas adjacent to or in proximity to its other wireless licenses, thereby building contiguous operating market areas. U.S. Cellular anticipates that grouping its operations into market areas will continue to provide it with certain economies in its capital and operating costs. In recent years, U.S. Cellular’s focus has broadened to include exchanges and divestitures of consolidated and investment interests which are considered less essential to its operating strategy.

Wireless systems in U.S. Cellular’s consolidated markets served 4,945,000 customers at December 31, 2004, and contained 4,856 cell sites. The average penetration rate in U.S. Cellular’s consolidated markets, as calculated by dividing the number of U.S. Cellular customers by the total population in such markets was 11.14% at December 31, 2004, and the number of customers who discontinued service (the “churn rate”) in these markets averaged 1.66% per month for the twelve months ended December 31, 2004.

Wireless Telephone Operations

The Wireless Telephone Industry.  Wireless telephone technology provides high-quality, high-capacity communications services to hand-held portable and in-vehicle wireless telephones. Wireless telephone systems are designed for maximum mobility of the customer. Access is provided through system interconnections to local, regional, national and world-wide telecommunications networks. Wireless telephone systems also offer a full range of services, similar to those offered by conventional (“landline”) telephone services. Data transmission capabilities offered by wireless telephone systems may be at slower speeds than those offered by landline telephone or other data service providers.

Wireless telephone systems divide each service area into smaller geographic areas or “cells.” Each cell is served by radio transmitters and receivers which operate on discrete radio frequencies licensed by the FCC. All of the cells in a system are connected to a computer-controlled mobile telephone switching office. Each mobile telephone switching office is connected to the landline telephone network and potentially other mobile telephone switching offices. Each conversation on a wireless phone involves a transmission over a specific set of radio frequencies from the wireless phone to a transmitter/receiver at a cell site. The transmission is forwarded from the cell site to the mobile telephone switching office and from there may be forwarded to the landline telephone network or to another wireless phone to complete the call. As the wireless telephone moves from one cell to another, the mobile telephone switching office determines radio signal strength and transfers (“hands off”) the call from one cell to the next. This hand-off is not noticeable to either party on the phone call.

6

The FCC currently grants two licenses to provide cellular telephone service in each cellular licensed area. Multiple licenses have been granted in each personal communications service licensed area, and these licensed areas overlap with cellular licensed areas. As a result, personal communications service license holders can and do compete with cellular license holders for customers. In addition, specialized mobile radio systems operators such as Nextel are providing wireless services similar to those offered by U.S. Cellular. Competition for customers also includes competing communications technologies, such as:

•conventional landline telephone,

•mobile satellite communications systems,

•radio paging,

•mobile virtual network operators, and

•Voice Over Internet Protocol.

Personal communications service licensees have initiated service in nearly all areas of the United States, including substantially all of U.S. Cellular’s licensed areas, and U.S. Cellular expects other wireless operators to continue deployment in all of U.S. Cellular’s operating regions in the future. Additionally, technologies such as enhanced specialized mobile radio are competitive with wireless service in substantially all of U.S. Cellular’s markets.

The services available to wireless customers and the sources of revenue available to wireless system operators are similar to those provided by landline telephone companies. Customers may be charged a separate fee for system access, airtime, long-distance calls and ancillary services. Wireless system operators also provide service to customers of other operators’ wireless systems while the customers are temporarily located within the operators’ service areas.

Customers using service away from their home system are called “roamers.” Roaming is available because technical standards require that analog wireless telephones be compatible in all market areas in the United States. Additionally, because U.S. Cellular has deployed digital radio technologies in substantially all of its service areas, its customers with digital, dual-mode (both analog and digital capabilities) or tri-mode (analog plus digital capabilities at both the cellular and personal communications service radio frequencies) wireless telephones can roam in other companies’ service areas which have a compatible digital technology in place. Likewise, U.S. Cellular can provide roaming service to other companies’ customers who have compatible digital wireless telephones. In all cases, the system that provides the service to roamers will generate usage revenue, at rates that have been negotiated between the serving carrier and the customer’s carrier.

There have been a number of technical developments in the wireless industry since its inception. Currently, while substantially all companies’ mobile telephone switching offices process information digitally, on certain cellular systems the radio transmission uses analog technology. All personal communications service systems utilize digital radio transmission. Several years ago, certain digital transmission techniques were approved for implementation by the wireless industry in the United States. Time Division Multiple Access (“TDMA”) technology was selected as one industry standard by the wireless industry and has been deployed by many wireless operators, including U.S. Cellular’s operations in a substantial portion of its markets. Another digital technology, Code Division Multiple Access (“CDMA”), was also deployed by U.S. Cellular in its remaining markets.

In late 2001, U.S. Cellular announced its plans to migrate to a single digital technology, CDMA, for its customers in all of its markets. U.S. Cellular believes that a single digital technology platform represents the best network strategy to foster its future growth. In 2002, U.S. Cellular began its plans to deploy CDMA 1XRTT technology, which improves capacity and allows for higher speed data transmission than basic CDMA, throughout all of its markets, over a three-year period ending in 2004. As of December 31, 2004, U.S. Cellular had deployed CDMA 1XRTT technology in substantially all of its licensed areas, including areas where it had previously deployed TDMA technology, as part of its technology conversion plans. Migration of U.S. Cellular’s customers to CDMA handsets in all of its markets is expected to take a few additional years.

7

U.S. Cellular believes CDMA technology is the best digital radio technology choice for its operations for the following reasons:

•TDMA technology may not be supported by manufacturers of future generations of wireless products due to limitations on the services it enables wireless companies to provide.

•CDMA technology has a lower long-term cost in relation to the spectrum efficiency it provides compared to similar costs of other technologies.

•CDMA technology provides improved coverage at most cell sites compared to other technologies.

•CDMA technology provides a more efficient evolution to a wireless network with higher data speeds, which will enable U.S. Cellular to provide enhanced data services.

The main disadvantage of U.S. Cellular’s conversion to CDMA technology is that it is generally not used outside of the United States. A third digital technology, Global System for Mobile Communication (“GSM”), is the standard technology in Europe and most other areas outside the United States. GSM technology, which is used by certain wireless companies in the United States, has certain advantages over CDMA in that GSM phones can be used more widely outside of the United States and GSM has a larger installed worldwide customer base. Also, TDMA technology is used in many parts of the United States and in other countries as well. Since CDMA technology is not compatible with GSM or TDMA technology, U.S. Cellular customers with CDMA-based handsets may not be able to use all of their handset features when traveling through GSM- and TDMA-based networks. Through roaming agreements with other CDMA-based wireless carriers, U.S. Cellular’s customers may access CDMA service in virtually all areas of the United States.

U.S. Cellular will continue to retain TDMA technology for the next several years in markets in which such technology is in use today. This will enable U.S. Cellular to provide TDMA-based service to its customers who still choose to use TDMA-based handsets and to roamers from other wireless providers who have TDMA-based networks. Also, since the TDMA equipment has analog capabilities embedded, U.S. Cellular will maintain the TDMA network in order to be able to meet the FCC mandate of retaining analog capability through 2008.

U.S. Cellular continually reviews its long-term technology plans. In 2005, U.S. Cellular expects to introduce a limited trial of Evolution—Data Optimized (“EV-DO”) technology. This technology, which increases the speed of data transmissions on the wireless network, is being deployed by certain other wireless companies. A revision to the current EV-DO standard is expected to be commercially available in 2006. U.S. Cellular will evaluate any planned investment in EV-DO technology in light of the revenue opportunities afforded by the deployment of such technology.

U.S. Cellular’s Operations.  Management anticipates that U.S. Cellular will experience increases in wireless units in service and revenues in 2005 through internal growth and through the launch of new markets as the licenses acquired in 2001, 2002 and 2003 are developed and become integrated into its operations.

Expenses associated with customer and revenue growth may reduce the amount of cash flows from operating activities and operating income during 2005. In addition, U.S. Cellular anticipates that the seasonality of revenue streams and operating expenses may cause U.S. Cellular’s cash flows from operating activities and operating income to vary from quarter to quarter.

Changes in any of several factors may reduce U.S. Cellular’s growth in operating income and net income over the next few years. These factors include but are not limited to:

•the growth rate in U.S. Cellular’s customer base;

•the usage and pricing of wireless services;

•the cost of providing wireless services, including the cost of attracting and retaining customers;

•the cost to begin or integrate operations of newly acquired licensed areas;

•the churn rate;

•continued capital expenditures, which are necessary to improve the quality of U.S. Cellular’s network and to expand its operations into new markets;

8

•continued competition from other wireless licensees and other telecommunication technologies;

•continued consolidation in the wireless industry;

•the growth rate in the use of U.S. Cellular’s easyedge^sm brand of enhanced data services and products;

•continued declines in inbound roaming revenue; and

•continuing technological advances which may provide wireless products/services and additional competitive alternatives to wireless service.

U.S. Cellular is building a substantial presence in selected geographic areas throughout the United States where it can efficiently integrate and manage wireless telephone systems. Its wireless interests included six market areas as of December 31, 2004. See “U.S. Cellular’s Wireless Interests.”

Wireless Systems Development

Acquisitions, Divestitures and Exchanges.  U.S. Cellular assesses its wireless holdings on an ongoing basis in order to maximize the benefits derived from its operating markets. U.S. Cellular also reviews attractive opportunities for the acquisition of additional wireless spectrum. As part of this strategy, U.S. Cellular may from time-to-time be engaged in negotiations relating to the acquisition of companies, strategic properties or wireless spectrum. U.S. Cellular may plan to participate as a bidder, or member of a bidding group, in auctions administered by the FCC. See “Auction 58” for a discussion of the auction completed in early 2005. Recently, U.S. Cellular has been disposing of those markets that are not strategic to its long-term success and redeploying capital to more strategically important parts of the business. As part of this strategy, U.S. Cellular may from time-to-time be engaged in negotiations relating to the disposition of other non-strategic properties.

U.S. Cellular may continue to make opportunistic acquisitions or exchanges in markets that further strengthen its operating market areas and in other attractive markets. U.S. Cellular also seeks to acquire minority interests in licenses where it already owns the majority interest and/or operates the license. There can be no assurance that U.S. Cellular will be able to negotiate additional acquisitions or exchanges on terms acceptable to it or that regulatory approvals, where required, will be received. U.S. Cellular plans to retain minority interests in certain wireless licenses which it believes will earn a favorable return on investment. Other minority interests may be exchanged for interests in licenses which enhance U.S. Cellular’s operations or may be sold for cash or other consideration. U.S. Cellular also continues to evaluate the disposition of certain controlling interests in wireless licenses which are not essential to its corporate development strategy.

Auction 58.  U.S. Cellular is a limited partner in Carroll Wireless, an entity which participated in the auction of wireless spectrum designated by the FCC as Auction 58. Carroll Wireless was qualified to bid on spectrum which was available only to companies that fall under the FCC definition of “designated entities,” which are small businesses that have a limited amount of assets. Carroll Wireless was a successful bidder for 17 licensed areas in Auction 58, which ended on February 15, 2005. These 17 licensed areas cover portions of 11 states and are in markets which are either adjacent to or overlap current U.S. Cellular licensed areas.

On March 4, 2005, Carroll Wireless increased the amount on deposit with the FCC to approximately $26 million, from $9 million initially deposited, and filed an application with the FCC seeking a grant of the subject licenses. The aggregate amount due to the FCC for the 17 licenses is $129.9 million, net of all bidding credits to which Carroll Wireless is entitled as a designated entity. U.S. Cellular consolidates Carroll Wireless for financial reporting purposes, pursuant to the guidelines of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46R, as U.S. Cellular anticipates absorbing a majority of Carroll Wireless’ expected gains or losses.

Carroll Wireless is in the process of developing its long-term business and financing plans. As of March 4, 2005, U.S. Cellular has made capital contributions and advances to Carroll Wireless and/or its general partner of approximately $26 million. Pending finalization of Carroll Wireless’ permanent financing plan, and upon request by Carroll Wireless, U.S. Cellular may make capital contributions and advances to Carroll Wireless and/or its general partner of up to $130 million to fund the payments to the FCC and additional working capital.

Sales of Wireless Interests.  On December 20, 2004, U.S. Cellular completed the sale of its controlling interest in one personal communications service license to MetroPCS California/Florida, Inc. (“MetroPCS”) for $8.5 million.

9

On November 30, 2004, U.S. Cellular completed the sales of two consolidated markets and five minority interests to ALLTEL Communications Inc. (“ALLTEL”) for $80.2 million in cash, subject to a working capital adjustment. U.S. Cellular recorded a pretax gain of $38.0 million related to this transaction at the time of its completion, representing the excess of the cash received over the net book value of the assets and liabilities sold, subject to a working capital adjustment. The portion of the gain related to the two consolidated markets included in operations of $10.1 million, was recorded in (gain) loss on assets held for sale in the Statement of Operations. The remaining portion of the gains of $27.9 million was recorded in gain (loss) on investments included within investment and other income (expense) on the Statement of Operations.

On February 18, 2004, U.S. Cellular completed the sale of certain of its wireless properties in southern Texas to AT&T Wireless for $96.5 million in cash, including a working capital adjustment. The U.S. Cellular properties sold included wireless assets and customers in six markets. An aggregate loss of $21.3 million (including a $22.0 million estimate of the loss on assets of operations held for sale in the fourth quarter of 2003 and a $0.7 million reduction of the loss in 2004) was recorded as a loss on assets of operations held for sale (included in operating expenses), representing the difference between the carrying value of the markets sold to AT&T Wireless and the cash received in the transaction.

Pending Acquisition of Market.  On November 30, 2004, U.S. Cellular entered into a definitive agreement with Cingular to acquire a controlling interest in one cellular license. U.S. Cellular anticipates that this transaction will be completed during the first half of 2005.

License Rights Related to Exchange of Markets with AT&T Wireless.  Pursuant to a transaction with AT&T Wireless which was completed on August 1, 2003, U.S. Cellular acquired rights to 21 licenses that have not yet been assigned to U.S. Cellular. These licenses, with a recorded value of $42.0 million, are accounted for in license rights on the consolidated Balance Sheet. All asset values related to the properties acquired or pending, including license values, were determined by U.S. Cellular.

Wireless Interests and Operating Market Areas

U.S. Cellular operates its adjacent wireless systems under an organization structure in which it groups its markets into geographic market areas to offer customers large local service areas which primarily utilize U.S. Cellular’s network. Customers may make outgoing calls and receive incoming calls within each market area without special roaming arrangements. In addition to benefits to customers, its operating strategy also has provided to U.S. Cellular certain economies in its capital and operating costs. These economies are made possible through the reduction of outbound roaming costs and increased sharing of facilities, personnel and other costs, enabling U.S. Cellular to minimize its per customer cost of service. The extent to which U.S. Cellular benefits from these revenue enhancements and economies of operation is dependent on market conditions, population size of each market area and network engineering considerations.

The following section details U.S. Cellular’s wireless interests, including those it owned or had the right to acquire as of December 31, 2004. The table presented therein lists the markets that U.S. Cellular manages or has the right to manage, grouped according to operating market area. The operating market areas represent areas in which U.S. Cellular is currently focusing its development efforts. These market areas have been devised with a long-term goal of allowing delivery of wireless service to areas of economic interest and areas of economic activity.

The table aggregates the total population of the consolidated licenses within each operating market area, regardless of U.S. Cellular’s percentage ownership in the licenses included in such operating market areas. Those markets in which U.S. Cellular owns less than 100% of the license show U.S. Cellular’s ownership percentage; in all others, U.S. Cellular owns 100% of the license. For licenses in which U.S. Cellular owns an investment interest, the related population equivalents are shown, defined as the total population of each licensed area multiplied by U.S. Cellular’s ownership interest in each such license.

The total population and population equivalents measures are provided to enable comparison of the relative size of each operating market area to U.S. Cellular’s consolidated operations and to enable comparison of the relative size of U.S. Cellular’s consolidated markets to its investment interests, respectively. The total population of U.S. Cellular’s consolidated markets may have no direct relationship to the number of wireless customers or the revenues that may be realized from the operation of the related wireless systems.

10

U.S. CELLULAR’S WIRELESS INTERESTS

The table below sets forth certain information with respect to the interests in wireless markets which U.S. Cellular owned or had the right to acquire pursuant to definitive agreements as of December 31, 2004.

Some of the territory covered by the personal communications service licenses U.S. Cellular owns overlaps with territory covered by the cellular licenses it owns. For the purpose of tracking amounts in the “2003 Total Population” column in the table below, when U.S. Cellular acquires or agrees to acquire a licensed area that overlaps a licensed area it already owns, it does not duplicate the total population for any overlapping licensed area. Only non-overlapping, incremental population amounts are added to the amounts in the “2003 Total Population” column in the table below, in the case of an acquisition of a licensed area that overlaps a previously owned licensed area.

Market Area/Market	Current or Future Percentage Interest (if less than 100%) (1)		2003 Total Population (2)
Markets Currently Consolidated or Which Are Expected To Be Consolidated
MIDWEST MARKET AREA:
Chicago Major Trading Area/Michigan
Chicago, IL-IN-MI-OH 20MHz B Block MTA # (3) (4)
Kalamazoo, MI 20MHz A Block # (5)
Battle Creek, MI 20MHz A Block # (5)
Jackson, MI 10MHz A Block # (5)
Total Chicago Major Trading Area/Michigan			13,012,000
Illinois/Indiana
Indianapolis, IN 10MHz F Block # (5)
Peoria, IL
Jo Daviess (IL 1)
Rockford, IL
Bloomington-Bedford, IN 10MHz B Block # (5)
Terre Haute, IN-IL 20MHz B Block #
Adams (IL 4) *
Carbondale-Marion, IL 10MHz A Block/10MHz D Block # (5)
Mercer (IL 3)
Miami (IN 4) *	85.71	%
Anderson, IN 10MHz B Block # (5)
Muncie, IN 10MHz B Block # (5)
Lafayette, IN 10MHz B Block #
Columbus, IN 10MHz B Block # (5)
Warren (IN 5) *	33.33	%
Mount Vernon-Centralia, IL 10MHz A Block #
Kokomo-Logansport, IN 10MHz B Block #
Richmond, IN 10MHz B Block # (5)
Vincennes-Washington, IN-IL 10MHz B Block # (5)
Marion, IN 10MHz B Block #
Alton, IL *
Rockford, IL 10MHz E Block #
Peoria, IL 10MHz C Block #
Peoria, IL 10MHz E Block #
Springfield, IL 10MHz E Block/10MHz F Block #
Decatur-Effingham, IL 10MHz E Block/10MHz F Block #
Bloomington, IL 10MHz E Block/10MHz F Block #
Champaign-Urbana, IL 10MHz E Block/F Block #
LaSalle-Peru-Ottawa-Streator, IL 10MHz C Block #
LaSalle-Peru-Ottawa-Streator, IL 10MHz F Block #
Danville, IL-IN 15MHz C Block #
Galesburg, IL 30MHz C Block #
Jacksonville, IL 10MHz F Block #
Mattoon, IL 10MHz E Block/10MHz F Block #
Total Illinois/Indiana			5,224,000

11

Market Area/Market	Current or Future Percentage Interest (if less than 100%) (1)		2003 Total Population (2)
Markets Currently Consolidated or Which Are Expected To Be Consolidated
MIDWEST MARKET AREA (Continued):
Wisconsin/Minnesota
Milwaukee, WI
Madison, WI	92.50	%
Columbia (WI 9)
Appleton, WI
Wood (WI 7)
Rochester, MN 10MHz F Block #
Vernon (WI 8)
Green Bay, WI
Racine, WI	95.82	%
Kenosha, WI	99.32	%
Janesville-Beloit, WI
Door (WI 10)
Sheboygan, WI
La Crosse, WI	96.51	%
Trempealeau (WI 6) (3)
Pierce (WI 5) (3)
Milwaukee, WI 10MHz D Block #
Madison, WI 10MHz F Block #
Total Wisconsin/Minnesota			4,738,000
Nebraska/Iowa/Missouri/South Dakota:
Des Moines, IA
Davenport, IA-IL	97.37	%
Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 10MHz F Block # (5)
Cedar Rapids, IA	96.43	%
Humboldt (IA 10)
Iowa (IA 6)
Muscatine (IA 4)
Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA	93.03	%
Iowa City, IA
Hardin (IA 11)
Jackson (IA 5)
Kossuth (IA 14)
Lyon (IA 16)
Dubuque, IA	97.55	%
Mitchell (IA 13)
Audubon (IA 7)
Union (IA 2)
Fort Dodge, IA 10MHz D Block # (5)
Des Moines, IA 10MHz D Block #
Davenport, IA-IL 10MHz E Block #
Clinton, IA-IL 10MHz E Block #
Burlington, IA-IL-MO 10MHz E Block #
Iowa City, IA 10MHz E Block #
Ottumwa, IA 10MHz E Block #
Total Iowa/Nebraska/South Dakota			2,737,000
Nebraska/Iowa/Missouri/Kansas
Omaha, NE-IA 10 MHz A Block/10MHz E Block #
Lincoln, NE 10MHz F Block #
Mills (IA 1)
Total Nebraska/Iowa/Missouri/Kansas			1,375,000
TOTAL MIDWEST MARKET AREA			27,086,000

12

Market Area/Market	Current or Future Percentage Interest (if less than 100%) (1)		2003 Total Population (2)
Markets Currently Consolidated or Which Are Expected To Be Consolidated
MID-ATLANTIC MARKET AREA:
Eastern North Carolina/South Carolina
Harnett (NC 10)
Rockingham (NC 7)
Northampton (NC 8)
Greenville (NC 14)
Greene (NC 13)
Hoke (NC 11)
Wilmington, NC	98.82	%
Chesterfield (SC 4)
Chatham (NC 6)
Sampson (NC 12)
Jacksonville, NC	97.57	%
Camden (NC 9)
Total Eastern North Carolina/South Carolina			2,831,000
Virginia/North Carolina
Roanoke, VA
Giles (VA 3)
Bedford (VA 4)
Ashe (NC 3)
Charlottesville, VA	95.37	%
Lynchburg, VA
Buckingham (VA 7)
Tazewell (VA 2) (3)
Bath (VA 5)
Total Virginia/North Carolina			1,414,000
West Virginia/Maryland/Pennsylvania
Monongalia (WV 3) *
Raleigh (WV 7) *
Grant (WV 4) *
Hagerstown, MD *
Tucker (WV 5) *
Cumberland, MD *
Bedford (PA 10) * (3)
Garrett (MD 1) *
Total West Virginia/Maryland/Pennsylvania			1,161,000
TOTAL MID-ATLANTIC MARKET AREA			5,406,000

13

Market Area/Market	Current or Future Percentage Interest (if less than 100%) (1)		2003 Total Population (2)
Markets Currently Consolidated or Which Are Expected To Be Consolidated
SOUTHWEST MARKET AREA:
Texas/Oklahoma/Missouri/Kansas/Arkansas
Oklahoma City, OK 10MHz F Block #
Tulsa, OK *
Wichita, KS 10MHz A Block # (5)
Fayetteville-Springdale, AR 10MHz A Block # (5)
Fort Smith, AR-OK 10MHz A Block # (5)
Seminole (OK 6)
Garvin (OK 9)
Joplin, MO *
Elk (KS 15) *	75.00	%
Wichita Falls, TX *	78.45	%
Lawton, OK *	78.45	%
Nowata (OK 4) * (3)
Lawrence, KS 10MHz E Block # (5)
Jackson (OK 8) *	78.45	%
Enid, OK 10MHz C Block #
Haskell (OK 10)
Stillwater, OK 10MHz F Block #
Ponca City, OK 30MHz C Block #
Hardeman (TX 5) * (3)	78.45	%
Briscoe (TX 4) * (3)	78.45	%
Beckham (OK 7) * (3)	78.45	%
Total Texas/Oklahoma/Missouri/Kansas/Arkansas			5,221,000
Missouri/Illinois/Kansas/Arkansas
St. Louis, MO/IL 10MHz A Block #
Springfield, MO 20MHz A Block #
St. Joseph, MO-KS 10MHz E Block #
Cape Girardeau-Sikeston, MO/IL 10MHz A Block/10MHz D Block # (5)
Moniteau (MO 11)
Columbia, MO *
Poplar Bluff, MO/AR 10MHz A Block # (5)
Stone (MO 15)
Jefferson City, MO 10MHz A Block #
Barton (MO 14) (6)
Rolla, MO 10MHz A Block #
Laclede (MO 16)
Washington (MO 13)
Callaway (MO 6) *
Sedalia, MO 10MHz C Block #
Schuyler (MO 3)
Shannon (MO 17)
Linn (MO 5) (3)
Columbia, MO 10MHz A Block #
Harrison (MO 2) (3)
Total Missouri/Illinois/Kansas/Arkansas			4,914,000
TOTAL SOUTHWEST MARKET AREA			10,135,000

14

Market Area/Market	Current or Future Percentage Interest (if less than 100%) (1)		2003 Total Population (2)
Markets Currently Consolidated or Which Are Expected To Be Consolidated
MAINE/NEW HAMPSHIRE/VERMONT MARKET AREA:
Portland-Brunswick, ME 10MHz A Block #
Burlington, VT 10MHz D Block #
Manchester-Nashua, NH	96.66	%
Carroll (NH 2)
Coos (NH 1) *
Kennebec (ME 3)
Bangor, ME	97.16	%
Somerset (ME 2)
Addison (VT 2) * (3)
Lewiston-Auburn, ME	88.45	%
Washington (ME 4) *
Oxford (ME 1)
Rutland-Bennington, VT 10MHz D Block #
Lebanon-Claremont, NH-VT 10MHz A Block # (5)
Burlington, VT 10MHz E Block # (5)
TOTAL MAINE/NEW HAMPSHIRE/VERMONT MARKET AREA			2,800,000
NORTHWEST MARKET AREA:
Oregon/California/Idaho
Clark (ID 6)
Coos (OR 5)
Crook (OR 6) *
Del Norte (CA 1)
Medford, OR *
Butte (ID 5) (7)
Mendocino (CA 9)
Modoc (CA 2)
Total Oregon/California/Idaho			1,603,000
Washington/Oregon
Yakima, WA *	87.81	%
Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA *
Pacific (WA 6) *
Umatilla (OR 3) *
Okanogan (WA 4)
Kittitas (WA 5) * (3)	98.24	%
Hood River (OR 2) *
Skamania (WA 7) *
Total Washington/Oregon			1,101,000
TOTAL NORTHWEST MARKET AREA			2,704,000
EASTERN TENNESSEE/WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA MARKET AREA:
Knoxville, TN *
Asheville, NC *
Henderson (NC 4) * (3)
Bledsoe (TN 7) * (3)
Hamblen (TN 4) * (3)
Cleveland, TN 10MHz C Block #
Yancey (NC 2) * (3)
TOTAL EASTERN TENNESSEE/WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA MARKET AREA			1,532,000
Other Markets:
Jefferson (NY 1) *	60.00	%
Franklin (NY 2) *	57.14	%
Total Other Markets			482,000
Total Markets Currently Consolidated or Which are Expected to Be Consolidated			50,145,000

15

Market Area/Market	2003 Total Population (2)	Current Percentage Interest (1)		Current and Acquirable Population Equivalents (8)
Investment Markets:
Los Angeles/Oxnard, CA *	17,182,000	5.50	%	945,000
Oklahoma City, OK *	1,074,000	14.60	%	157,000
Rochester, MN/Chippewa (MN 7)/Lac Qui Parle (MN 8)/ Pipestone (MN 9)/Le Sueur (MN 10)/ Goodhue (MN 11)*	971,000	15.22	%	147,000
Cherokee (NC 1) *	209,000	50.00	%	105,000
Others (Fewer than 100,000 population equivalents each)				360,000
Total Population Equivalents in Investment Markets				1,714,000

*Designates wireline cellular licensed area.

#Designates personal communications service licensed area.

(1)Represents U.S. Cellular’s ownership percentage in these licensed areas as of December 31, 2004 or as of the completion of any related transactions pending as of December 31, 2004. U.S. Cellular owns 100% of any licensed areas which do not indicate a percentage.

(2)“2003 Total Population” represents the total population of the licensed area in which U.S. Cellular owns or has rights to own an interest, based on 2003 Claritas estimates (without duplication of the population counts of any overlapping licensed areas). In personal communications service licensed areas, this amount represents the portion of the personal communications service licensed areas owned that is not already served by a cellular licensed area in which U.S. Cellular owns a controlling interest. The “2003 Total Population” of Total Markets Currently Consolidated or which are expected to be consolidated includes rights to acquire licensed areas with a total population of 5,754,000. Excluding the population of these licensed areas to be acquired, U.S. Cellular’s total population was 44,391,000 at December 31, 2004.

(3)These markets have been partitioned into more than one licensed area. The 2003 population, percentage ownership and number of population equivalents shown are for the licensed areas within the markets in which U.S. Cellular owns an interest.

(4)This personal communications service licensed area is made up of 18 basic trading areas, as follows: Benton Harbor, MI; Bloomington, IL; Champaign-Urbana, IL; Chicago, IL (excluding Kenosha County, WI); Danville, IL-IN; Decatur-Effingham, IL; Elkhart, IN-MI; Fort Wayne, IN-OH; Galesburg, IL; Jacksonville, IL; Kankakee, IL; LaSalle-Peru-Ottawa-Streator, IL; Mattoon, IL; Michigan City, IN; Peoria, IL; Rockford, IL; South Bend-Mishawaka, IN; and Springfield, IL.

(5)U.S. Cellular acquired the rights to these licensed areas during 2003. Pursuant to an agreement with the seller of these licensed areas, U.S. Cellular has deferred the assignment and development of these licensed areas until up to five years from the closing date of the original transaction.

(6)Pursuant to an agreement entered into during 2004 with Cingular, U.S. Cellular has rights to acquire a controlling interest in this license. The licensed area also includes 10 megahertz of personal communications service spectrum that overlaps a portion of the area covered by the cellular license to be acquired, for a total of 35 megahertz of spectrum in the overlapping area. U.S. Cellular anticipates that the transaction will be completed during the first half of 2005.

(7)This licensed area includes territory and population equivalents of a fill-in area which was annexed from a nearby cellular licensed area.

(8)“Current and Acquirable Population Equivalents” are derived by multiplying the amount in the “2003 Total Population” column by the percentage interest indicated in the “Current Percentage Interest” column.

16

System Design and Construction.  U.S. Cellular designs and constructs its systems in a manner it believes will permit it to provide high-quality service to substantially all types of wireless telephones which are compatible with its network technology, based on market and engineering studies which relate to specific markets. Such engineering studies are performed by U.S. Cellular personnel or third party engineering firms. U.S. Cellular’s switching equipment is digital, which provides high-quality transmissions and is capable of interconnecting in a manner which minimizes costs of operation. Both analog and digital radio transmissions are made between cell sites and the wireless telephones. During 2004, over 95% of this traffic utilized digital radio transmissions. Network reliability is given careful consideration and extensive redundancy is employed in many aspects of U.S. Cellular’s network design. Route diversity, ring topology and extensive use of emergency standby power are also utilized to enhance network reliability and minimize service disruption from any particular network failure.

In accordance with its strategy of building and strengthening its operating market areas, U.S. Cellular has selected high-capacity digital wireless switching systems that are capable of serving multiple markets through a single mobile telephone switching office. U.S. Cellular’s wireless systems are designed to facilitate the installation of equipment which will permit microwave interconnection between the mobile telephone switching office and the cell site. U.S. Cellular has implemented such microwave interconnection in many of the wireless systems it operates. In other areas, U.S. Cellular’s systems rely upon landline telephone connections to link cell sites with the mobile telephone switching office. Although the installation of microwave network interconnection equipment requires a greater initial capital investment, a microwave network enables a system operator to avoid the current and future charges associated with leasing telephone lines from the landline telephone company.

U.S. Cellular has continued to expand its wide area network to accommodate various business functions, including:

•order processing

•over the air provisioning

•automatic call delivery

•intersystem handoff

•credit validation

•fraud prevention

•call data record collection

•network management

•long-distance traffic and

•interconnectivity of all of U.S. Cellular’s mobile telephone switching offices and cell sites.

In addition, the wide area network accommodates virtually all internal data communications between various U.S. Cellular office and retail locations to process customer activations. The wide area network is deployed in U.S. Cellular’s six customer service centers (“Customer Care Centers”) for all customer service functions using U.S. Cellular’s billing and information system. The wide area network will also be deployed in U.S. Cellular’s newest Customer Care Center, in Bolingbrook, IL, when it opens in 2005.

Management believes that currently available technologies will allow sufficient capacity on U.S. Cellular’s networks to meet anticipated demand for voice services over the next few years. High-speed data and video services may require the acquisition of additional licenses to provide sufficient capacity in markets where U.S. Cellular offers these services.

Costs of System Construction and Financing

Construction of wireless systems is capital-intensive, requiring substantial investment for land and improvements, buildings, towers, mobile telephone switching offices, cell site equipment, microwave equipment, engineering and installation. U.S. Cellular, consistent with FCC control requirements, uses primarily its own personnel to engineer each wireless system it owns and operates, and engages contractors to construct the facilities.

17

The costs (exclusive of the costs to acquire licenses) to develop the systems in which U.S. Cellular owns a controlling interest have historically been financed primarily through proceeds from debt and equity offerings and, in recent years, with cash generated by operations and proceeds from the sales of wireless interests. U.S. Cellular expects to meet its future funding requirements with cash generated by operations and borrowings under its revolving credit facilities. U.S. Cellular also may have access to public and private capital markets to help meet its long-term financing needs. In 2005, U.S. Cellular estimates its capital expenditures will total between $570 million and $610 million.

Marketing

U.S. Cellular’s marketing plan is focused on acquiring, retaining and growing customer relationships by offering high-quality products and services—built around customer needs—at fair prices, supported by outstanding customer service. U.S. Cellular increases customer awareness through the use of traditional media such as TV, radio, newspaper and direct mail advertising. U.S. Cellular has achieved its current level of penetration of its markets through a combination of promotional advertising and broad distribution, and has been able to sustain a high customer retention rate based on its high-quality wireless network and outstanding customer service. U.S. Cellular supports a multi-faceted distribution program, including direct sales, agents and retail sales and service centers in the vast majority of its markets, plus the Internet and telesales for customers who wish to contact U.S. Cellular through those channels. U.S. Cellular maintains a low customer churn rate (relative to other wireless carriers) by focusing on customer satisfaction, development of processes that are more customer-friendly, extensive training of frontline sales and support associates and the implementation of retention programs. The marketing plan stresses the value of U.S. Cellular’s service offerings and incorporates combinations of rate plans, additional value-added features and services and wireless telephone equipment which are designed to meet the needs of defined customer segments and their usage patterns.

Company-owned and managed locations are designed to market wireless service to the consumer and small business segments in a setting familiar to these types of customers. U.S. Cellular has expanded its e-commerce site to enable customers to purchase a broad range of accessories online, and this site is continually evolving to address customers’ current needs. U.S. Cellular anticipates that as customers become increasingly comfortable with e-commerce, the Internet will become a more robust marketing channel for sales of rate plans as well as accessories. Traffic on U.S. Cellular’s Web site is continually increasing as customers use the site for gathering information, purchasing handsets and accessories, signing up for service and finding the locations of its stores and agents.

U.S. Cellular believes that, while strategy is set at the U.S. Cellular corporate level, day-to-day tactical operating decisions should be made close to the customer, and accordingly, it manages its operating market areas with a decentralized staff, including sales, marketing, network operations, engineering and finance personnel. U.S. Cellular operates six regional Customer Care Centers whose personnel are responsible for customer service and certain other functions. In 2005, U.S. Cellular plans to open a seventh Customer Care Center in Bolingbrook, IL to meet the needs of its expanding customer base. Direct sales consultants market wireless service to business customers. Retail sales associates work out of over 400 U.S. Cellular-owned retail stores and kiosks and market wireless service primarily to the consumer and small business segments. U.S. Cellular maintains an ongoing training program to improve the effectiveness of sales consultants and retail associates by focusing their efforts on obtaining customers and maximizing the sale of high-use packages. These packages enable customers to buy packages of minutes for a fixed monthly rate.

U.S. Cellular continues to expand its relationships with agents, dealers and non-Company retailers to obtain customers, and at year-end 2004 had contracts with over 800 of these businesses aggregating over 1,800 locations. Agents and dealers are independent business people who obtain customers for U.S. Cellular on a commission basis. U.S. Cellular has provided additional support and training to its exclusive agents to increase customer satisfaction for customers they serve. U.S. Cellular’s agents are generally in the business of selling wireless telephones, wireless service packages and other related products. U.S. Cellular’s dealers include major appliance dealers, car stereo companies and mass merchants including regional and national companies such as Wal-Mart, Radio Shack, Best Buy and American TV. Additionally, in support of its overall Internet initiatives, U.S. Cellular has recruited agents who provide services exclusively through the Internet. No single agent, dealer or other non-Company retailer accounted for 10% or more of U.S. Cellular’s operating revenues during the past three years.

U.S. Cellular uses a variety of direct mail, billboard, radio, television and newspaper advertising to stimulate interest by prospective customers in purchasing U.S. Cellular’s wireless service and to establish familiarity with U.S. Cellular’s name. U.S. Cellular operates under a unified brand name and logo, U.S. Cellular®, across all its markets, and uses the tag line, “We Connect With You”®.

18

U.S. Cellular’s advertising is directed at gaining customers, improving customers’ awareness of the U.S. Cellular® brand, increasing existing customers’ usage of U.S. Cellular’s services and increasing the public awareness and understanding of the wireless services it offers. U.S. Cellular attempts to select the advertising and promotion media that are most appealing to the targeted groups of potential customers in each local market. U.S. Cellular supplements its advertising with a focused public relations program. This program combines nationally supported activities and unique local activities, events, and sponsorships to enhance public awareness of U.S. Cellular and its brand. These programs are aimed at supporting the communities U.S. Cellular serves. The programs range from loaning phones to public service operations in emergencies, to assisting victims of domestic abuse through U.S. Cellular’s Stop Abuse From Existing programs, to supporting safe driving programs.

In 2003, U.S. Cellular secured the naming rights to the home of the Chicago White Sox American League baseball team, which is now called U.S. Cellular Field. Concurrent with the naming rights agreement, U.S. Cellular purchased a media package with rights to place various forms of advertising in and around the facility. These agreements have increased the visibility of U.S. Cellular’s brand not only in Chicago but throughout the United States.

U.S. Cellular continues to migrate customers in its cellular licensed areas from analog to digital service plans, and as of year-end 2004 over 95% of the minutes used were on U.S. Cellular’s digital network. Additionally, during the second half of 2003, U.S. Cellular began offering its easyedge^sm brand of enhanced data services in its operating market areas where it has implemented CDMA 1XRTT digital radio technology, supporting that effort using a wide variety of media. As of year-end 2004, easyedge^sm services were available in all of U.S. Cellular’s market areas. The initial results of the easyedge^sm rollout have been encouraging, as many new customers and existing customers have signed up for data service plans. These enhanced data services include downloading news/weather/sports information/games, ringtones and other consumer services as well as wireless modem capabilities to use with personal computers in some markets. In early 2004, U.S. Cellular began offering camera phone-capable handsets and the related services to its customers as part of its easyedge^sm suite of products and services, and as of year-end 2004 those services were available in all market areas. U.S. Cellular plans on further expansion of its easyedge^sm services in 2005 and beyond.

In October 2003, Edge Wireless, LLC (“Edge Wireless”) filed a complaint against U.S. Cellular in U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon alleging that the easyedge^sm mark infringes certain of Edge Wireless’s marks. In July 2004, the court found that U.S. Cellular’s easyedge^sm mark would not create a likelihood of confusion between the parties’ marks with respect to all types of advertising except for print advertising. The court ordered that in print materials U.S. Cellular must display the easyedge^sm mark with a separate and dominant U.S. Cellular house mark and star logo which is featured more prominently than the easyedge^sm mark. This order applies in areas in which U.S. Cellular competes with Edge Wireless, which include portions of U.S. Cellular’s service areas in California, Oregon and Idaho. An appeal of this order by Edge Wireless was settled for nominal consideration and will be dismissed.

The FCC mandated that all wireless carriers had to be capable of facilitating wireless number portability in all areas of the United States beginning on May 24, 2004. See “Regulation.” In conjunction with this mandate, U.S. Cellular began tailoring certain of its advertising to those customers who may be interested in switching wireless carriers and keeping their current wireless telephone number. To date, U.S. Cellular has been successful in accommodating those customers in all of its market areas who switch to U.S. Cellular service from other carriers and wish to keep their wireless telephone numbers. U.S. Cellular has also been successful in accommodating those customers in all of its market areas who wish to change from U.S. Cellular to another carrier and keep their wireless telephone numbers.

The following table summarizes, by operating market area, the total population, U.S. Cellular’s customers and penetration for U.S. Cellular’s consolidated markets as of December 31, 2004.

Operating Market Areas	Population (1)	Customers	Penetration
Midwest Market Area	23,242,000	2,476,000	10.65	%
Mid-Atlantic Market Area	5,406,000	772,000	14.28	%
Southwest Market Area	8,254,000	527,000	6.38	%
Maine/New Hampshire/Vermont Market Area	2,771,000	411,000	14.83	%
Northwest Market Area	2,704,000	464,000	17.16	%
Eastern Tennessee/Western North Carolina Market Area	1,532,000	196,000	12.79	%
Other Markets	482,000	99,000	20.54	%
	44,391,000	4,945,000	11.14	%

(1)Represents 100% of the population of the licensed areas in which U.S. Cellular has a controlling interest, based on 2003 Claritas population estimates. “Population” in this context includes only the areas covering such markets and is only used for the purposes of calculating market penetration and is not related to “population equivalents,” as previously defined.

19

Customers and System Usage

U.S. Cellular provides service to a broad range of customers from a wide spectrum of demographic segments. U.S. Cellular uses a segmentation model to classify businesses and consumers into logical groupings for developing new products and services, direct marketing campaigns, and retention efforts. Business users typically include a large proportion of individuals who work outside of their offices such as people in the construction, real estate, wholesale and retail distribution businesses as well as various professionals. Increasingly, U.S. Cellular is providing wireless service to consumers and to customers who use their wireless telephones for mixed business and personal use as well as for security purposes. A major portion of U.S. Cellular’s recent customer and revenue growth is from these users.

On average, the retail customers in U.S. Cellular’s consolidated markets used their wireless systems approximately 539 minutes per unit each month and generated retail service revenue of approximately $40 per month during 2004, compared to 422 minutes and $40 per month in 2003. Revenue generated by roamers using U.S. Cellular’s systems (“inbound roaming”), together with local retail, toll and other revenues, brought U.S. Cellular’s total average monthly service revenue per customer unit to $47 during 2004. Average monthly service revenue per customer unit decreased 1% during 2004. This result was primarily due to decreases in the average revenue per minute of use from both retail customers and roamers, almost fully offset by an increase in the number of minutes used by both retail customers and roamers. Competitive pressures, continued penetration of the consumer market and U.S. Cellular’s increasing use of pricing and other incentive programs to stimulate overall usage resulted in a decrease in average retail service revenue per minute of use in 2004. The decrease in inbound roaming revenue per minute was primarily due to the general downward trend in per minute prices for roaming negotiated between U.S. Cellular and other wireless operators. U.S. Cellular anticipates that average monthly retail service revenue per customer unit will not change significantly in the near future, while total monthly service revenue per customer is expected to decline slightly in the future, primarily due to the decline in inbound roaming revenues. However, this effect is anticipated to be more than offset by increases in U.S. Cellular’s customer base; therefore, U.S. Cellular anticipates that total revenues will continue to grow for the next few years.

U.S. Cellular’s main sources of revenue are from its own customers and from inbound roaming customers. The interconnectivity of wireless service enables a customer to place or receive a call in a wireless service area away from the customer’s home service area. U.S. Cellular has entered into roaming agreements with operators of other wireless systems covering virtually all systems in the United States, Canada and Mexico. Roaming agreements offer customers the opportunity to roam on these systems. These reciprocal agreements automatically pre-register the customers of U.S. Cellular’s systems in the other carriers’ systems. Also, a customer of a participating system roaming (i.e., traveling) in a U.S. Cellular market where this arrangement is in effect is able to make and receive calls on U.S. Cellular’s system. The charge for this service is negotiated as part of the roaming agreement between U.S. Cellular and the roaming customer’s carrier. U.S. Cellular bills this charge to the customer’s home carrier, which then bills the customer. In some instances, based on competitive factors, many carriers, including U.S. Cellular, may charge lower amounts to their customers than the amounts actually charged to the carriers by other wireless carriers for roaming.

Currently, U.S. Cellular’s roaming agreements with other carriers only cover voice-related services; however, U.S. Cellular has begun entering into roaming agreements which will cover data-related services such as those offered through its easyedge^sm suite of products and services, and anticipates expanding these roaming agreements to more carriers in the future. U.S. Cellular anticipates that entering into such agreements will provide additional flexibility for its customers and could enhance its inbound roaming revenue in the future.

20

The following table summarizes certain information about U.S. Cellular’s consolidated operations.

	Year Ended or At December 31,
	2004 (as restated)			2003 (as restated)			2002 (as restated)			2001 (as restated)			2000 (as restated)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Majority-owned and managed markets:
Wireless markets included in consolidated operations (1)	175			182			178			168			139
Total population of markets in service (000s) (2)	44,391			46,267			41,048			28,632			24,912
Customer Units:
at beginning of period (3)	4,409,000			4,103,000			3,461,000			3,061,000			2,602,000
acquired (divested) during period (4)	(91,000		)	(141,000		)	332,000			46,000			(24,000		)
additions during period (3)	1,557,000			1,357,000			1,244,000			1,095,000			1,154,000
disconnects during period (3)	(930,000		)	(910,000		)	(934,000		)	(741,000		)	(671,000		)
at end of period (3)	4,945,000			4,409,000			4,103,000			3,461,000			3,061,000
Market penetration at end of period (5)	11.14		%	9.53		%	10.00		%	12.09		%	12.29		%
Consolidated revenues	$	2,808,201		$	2,577,754		$	2,198,875		$	1,894,403		$	1,716,751
Depreciation expense	450,292			374,935			312,434			237,180			206,194
Amortization and accretion expense	47,910			57,564			39,161			63,883			60,304
Operating Income	183,329			108,725			279,770			316,102			291,135
Capital expenditures	656,243			630,864			732,376			503,399			306,098
Business segment assets	$	5,179,976		$	4,954,718		$	4,786,633		$	3,775,004		$	3,463,769

(1)Represents the number of licensed areas in which U.S. Cellular owned a controlling financial interest at the end of each respective period. The revenues and expenses of these licensed areas are included in U.S. Cellular’s consolidated revenues and expenses for each period.

(2)The decline in Total Population in 2004 reflects the divestitures of markets to AT&T Wireless and ALLTEL.

(3)Represents the number of revenue-generating wireless telephones served by U.S. Cellular in the licensed areas referred to in footnote (1). The revenue generated by such wireless telephones is included in consolidated revenues.

(4)Represents the net number of revenue-generating wireless telephones added to or subtracted from U.S. Cellular’s customer base during the period due to acquisitions and divestitures of wireless licenses.

(5)Computed by dividing the number of customer units at the end of the period by the total population of consolidated markets in service as estimated by Claritas (1999-2003) for the years 2000-2004, respectively.

Products and Services

Wireless Telephones and Installation.  U.S. Cellular offers a full range of wireless telephones for use by its customers, including both analog and digital handsets. U.S. Cellular’s digital service offerings include additional features such as caller ID, short messaging services and data transmission, including camera features, downloading and wireless modem capabilities. A majority of new customers are selecting dual-mode or tri-mode wireless telephones, which can be used on analog and digital networks, to fully utilize these features. These types of wireless telephones and associated features appeal to newer segments of the customer population, especially a younger demographic group which has become a fast-growing portion of the wireless user population. Dual-mode and tri-mode wireless telephones also enable customers to enjoy virtually seamless roaming regardless of their travel patterns. U.S. Cellular emphasizes these types of wireless telephones in its marketing efforts.

U.S. Cellular negotiates volume discounts with its wireless telephone suppliers. U.S. Cellular significantly increased its purchasing power in 2002 by implementing a distribution system that enables it to efficiently sell and distribute handsets to its agents, and has expanded its sales of handsets to agents throughout 2003 and 2004. U.S. Cellular discounts wireless telephones sold to new and current customers and provides upgraded handsets to current customers to meet competition, stimulate sales or retain customers by reducing the cost of becoming or remaining a wireless customer. In most instances, where permitted by law, customers are generally required to sign a new service contract or extend their current service contract with U.S. Cellular at the time the handset sale takes place. U.S. Cellular also works with wireless equipment manufacturers in promoting specific equipment in its local advertising.

U.S. Cellular has established service facilities in many of its local markets to ensure quality service of the wireless telephones it sells. These facilities allow U.S. Cellular to improve its service by promptly assisting customers who experience equipment problems. Additionally, U.S. Cellular employs a repair facility in Tulsa, Oklahoma, to handle more complex service and repair issues.

21

Wireless Services.  U.S. Cellular’s customers are able to choose from a variety of packaged voice and data pricing plans which are designed to fit different usage patterns and customer needs. The ability to help a customer find the right technology and the right pricing plan is central to U.S. Cellular’s brand positioning. U.S. Cellular generally offers local, regional and national consumer plans that can be tailored to a customer’s needs by the addition of features or feature packages. Many consumer plans enable small work groups or families to share the plan minutes, enabling the customer to get more value for their money. Business rate plans are offered to companies to meet their unique needs. U.S. Cellular’s national rate plan, SpanAmerica^sm, prices all calls, regardless of where they are made or received, as local calls with no long distance or roaming charges. Additionally, U.S. Cellular is continually reviewing its prepaid TalkTracker® offering to streamline it and make it more compatible with the lifestyles of the customers who want to buy this product. U.S. Cellular also has a reseller customer who purchases blocks of minutes and resells them to its customers. U.S. Cellular includes all of these reseller phone lines, which numbered 467,000 at December 31, 2004, in its reported customer base.

U.S. Cellular’s customer bills typically show separate charges for custom usage features, airtime in excess of the packaged amount (such packages may include roaming and toll usage), roaming and toll calls and data usage. Custom usage features provided by U.S. Cellular include wide-area call delivery, call forwarding, voice mail, call waiting, three-way calling and no-answer transfer.

Regulation

Regulatory Environment.  U.S. Cellular’s operations are subject to FCC and state regulation. The wireless telephone licenses U.S. Cellular holds are granted by the FCC for the use of radio frequencies in the 800 megahertz band (“cellular” licenses), and in the 1900 megahertz band (“personal communications service” licenses), and are an important component of the overall value of U.S. Cellular’s assets. The construction, operation and transfer of wireless systems in the United States are regulated to varying degrees by the FCC pursuant to the Communications Act of 1934 (“Communications Act”). In 1996, Congress enacted the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“Telecommunications Act”), which amended the Communications Act. The Telecommunications Act mandated significant changes in telecommunications rules and policies to promote competition, ensure the availability of telecommunications services to all parts of the United States and streamline regulation of the telecommunications industry to remove regulatory burdens, as competition develops. The FCC has promulgated regulations governing construction and operation of wireless systems, licensing (including renewal of licenses) and technical standards for the provision of wireless telephone service under the Communications Act, and is implementing the legislative objectives of the Telecommunications Act, as discussed below.

Licensing—Wireless Service.  For cellular telephone licensing purposes, the FCC has divided the United States into separate geographic markets (metropolitan statistical areas and rural service areas). In each market, the allocated cellular frequencies are divided into two equal blocks.

Since January 1, 2002, an entity which controls one cellular system in a metropolitan statistical area has been able to control the competing cellular system in that metropolitan statistical area. The FCC determined that wireless competition in metropolitan statistical areas among cellular, personal communications service and certain specialized mobile radio carriers, such as Nextel, which interconnect with the public switched telephone network, was sufficient to permit relaxation of the former prohibition on metropolitan statistical area cross-ownership.

In September 2004, the FCC also repealed the rule which prohibited any entity which controlled a cellular system in a rural service area from owning an interest in another cellular system in the same rural service area. Acquisition of both cellular licenses in the same rural service area will now be evaluated on a case by case basis. That rule took effect on February 14, 2005.

The FCC has also allocated a total of 140 megahertz for broadband personal communications service, 20 megahertz to unlicensed operations and 120 megahertz to licensed operations, originally consisting of two 30 megahertz blocks in each of 51 major trading areas and one 30 megahertz block and three 10 megahertz blocks in each of 493 basic trading areas. Certain of the 30 megahertz basic trading area frequency blocks were split into 10 and 15 megahertz segments when the original licensees, unable to pay their installment payments in full to the FCC, returned part of their assigned spectrum to the FCC and it was subsequently reauctioned. Subject to some conditions, the FCC also permits licensees to split their licenses and assign a portion, on either a geographic or frequency basis, or both, to a third party.

22

Prior to January 1, 2003, no entity was allowed to have a controlling interest in more than 55 megahertz of cellular, personal communications service, or “covered” specialized mobile radio spectrum in a given major trading area or basic trading area. Cellular systems have 25 megahertz of spectrum, and personal communications service systems typically may have 10, 15, or 30 megahertz of spectrum. As of January 1, 2003, this “spectrum cap” has been eliminated, and the FCC now determines whether acquisition of wireless licenses is in the public interest on a case-by-case basis under criteria which are being developed on a case-by-case basis.

The completion of acquisitions involving the transfer of control of a wireless system requires prior FCC approval. Acquisitions of minority interests generally do not require FCC approval. Whenever FCC approval is required, any interested party may file a petition to dismiss or deny the application for approval of the proposed transfer.

Licensing—Facilities.  The FCC must be notified each time an additional cell site is constructed which enlarges the service area of a given cellular market. The FCC’s rules also generally require persons or entities holding wireless construction permits or licenses to coordinate their proposed frequency usage with neighboring wireless licensees in order to avoid electrical interference between adjacent systems. The coordination process has become more complex as neighboring systems have begun to employ differing digital technologies. The height and power of base stations in wireless systems are regulated by FCC rules, as are the types of signals emitted by these stations. The FCC also regulates tower construction in accordance with its regulations, which carry out its responsibilities under the National Environmental Policy Act and Historic Preservation Act. In October, 2004, the FCC adopted a Nationwide Programmatic Agreement which exempts certain new towers from historic preservation review, but imposes additional notification and approval requirements on carriers with respect to state historic preservation officers and Indian tribes with an interest in the tower’s location. In addition to regulation by the FCC, wireless systems are subject to certain Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) regulations with respect to the siting, construction, painting and lighting of wireless transmitter towers and antennas as well as local zoning requirements.

Beginning in 1996, the FCC also imposed a requirement that all wireless licensees register and obtain FCC registration numbers for all of their antenna towers which require prior FAA clearance. All new towers must be registered at the time of construction and existing towers were required to be registered by May 1998 on a staggered state-by-state basis. U.S. Cellular believes that it is in compliance with the FCC’s tower registration requirements.

Beginning in October 1997, wireless systems, which previously were excluded from having to evaluate their facilities to ensure their compliance with federal “radio frequency” radiation requirements, were made subject to those requirements. As a result, all wireless towers of less than 10 meters in height, building-mounted antennas and wireless telephones must comply with radio frequency radiation guidelines. Since October 1997, all new wireless facilities have had to be in compliance when they are brought into service. Since September 1, 2000, all existing facilities have had to be brought into compliance. U.S. Cellular believes that its facilities are in compliance with these requirements. The FCC is currently considering changes to its rules to subject more proposed towers to environmental evaluation.

Licensing—Commercial Mobile Radio Service.  Pursuant to 1993 amendments to the Communications Act, cellular and personal communications services are classified as commercial mobile radio service, in that they are services offered to the public, for a fee, and are interconnected to the public switched telephone network. The FCC has determined that it will forebear from requiring such carriers to comply with a number of statutory provisions otherwise applicable to common carriers, such as the filing of tariffs.

All commercial mobile radio service wireless licensees must satisfy specified coverage requirements. Cellular licensees were required, during the five years following the initial grant of the respective license, to construct their systems to provide service (at a specified signal strength) to the territory encompassed by their service area. Failure to provide such coverage resulted in reduction of the relevant license area by the FCC. All 30 megahertz block personal communications service licensees must construct facilities that provide coverage to one-third of the population of the service area within five years of the initial license grants and to two-thirds of the population within ten years. All other licensees and certain 10 and 15 megahertz block licensees must construct facilities that provide coverage to one-fourth of the population of the licensed area or “make a showing of substantial service in their license area” within five years of the original license grants. Licensees that fail to meet the coverage requirements may be subject to forfeiture of the license.

In a rulemaking proceeding concluded in July of 2004, the FCC amended its rules to add a substantial service option for 30 megahertz block personal communications service licensees alternative to the service specific construction benchmarks already available to these licensees. These rules, which took effect on February 14, 2005, will give carriers greater flexibility to provide service based on the needs of individual customers and their own unique business plans.

23

Cellular and personal communications service licenses are granted for ten-year periods. The FCC has established standards for conducting comparative renewal proceedings between a cellular licensee seeking renewal of its license and challengers filing competing applications. The FCC has: (i) established criteria for comparing the renewal applicant to challengers, including the standards under which a renewal expectancy will be granted to the applicant seeking license renewal; (ii) established basic qualifications standards for challengers; and (iii) provided procedures for preventing possible abuses in the comparative renewal process. The FCC has concluded that it will award a renewal expectancy if the licensee has (i) provided “substantial” performance, which is defined as “sound, favorable and substantially above a level of mediocre service just minimally justifying renewal,” and (ii) complied with FCC rules, policies and the Communications Act. A majority of geographically licensed services, including personal communications services licensees are also afforded a similar renewal expectancy. If renewal expectancy is awarded to an existing licensee, its license is renewed and competing applications are not considered. All of U.S. Cellular’s licenses which it applied to have renewed between 1994 and 2004 have been renewed.

All of U.S. Cellular’s approximately 1,100 FCC licenses for the microwave radio stations it used to link its cell sites with each other and with its mobile telephone switching offices were required to be renewed in 2001. All of those licenses were renewed for ten-year terms. All newly obtained microwave licenses receive ten-year terms as well. Over the next few years, due to the licensing of new satellite services in the relevant frequency bands, it is likely that certain of U.S. Cellular’s remaining microwave facilities will have to be shifted to other frequencies. It is anticipated that those changes will be made without affecting service to customers and that the cost of such changes will not be significant.

U.S. Cellular conducts and plans to conduct its operations in accordance with all relevant FCC rules and regulations and anticipates being able to qualify for renewal expectancy in its upcoming renewal filings. Accordingly, U.S. Cellular believes that current regulations will have no significant effect on the renewal of its licenses. However, changes in the regulation of wireless operators or their activities and of other mobile service providers could have a material adverse effect on U.S. Cellular’s operations.

Recent Events—E-911.  There are certain regulatory proceedings currently pending before the FCC which are of particular importance to the wireless industry. In one proceeding, the FCC has imposed new enhanced 911 regulations on wireless carriers. The rules require wireless carriers to provide increasingly detailed information about the location of wireless 911 callers in two phases. The obligation of a wireless carrier to provide this information is triggered by a qualifying request from state or local agencies that handle 911 calls in the markets served by the wireless carrier. In phase one, which has been required since April 1998, wireless carriers are required to identify the location of the cell site from which a wireless call has been made and the wireless 911 caller’s phone number. U.S. Cellular has timely provided this information in compliance with the FCC’s rules in most but not all of its markets.

In 2001, U.S. Cellular filed a request for a waiver of phase two of the FCC’s E-911 rules that required wireless carriers to provide more precise latitude and longitude location information about wireless 911 callers by October 1, 2001. In July 2002, the FCC released an order that delayed until March 1, 2003, the deadline by which certain medium-sized wireless carriers, including U.S. Cellular, were required to provide more precise phase two location information in response to qualifying requests from state or local 911 agencies. U.S. Cellular is in compliance with the revised phase two enhanced 911 requirements in most of its markets. However, there is no guarantee that U.S. Cellular will not be subject to sanctions, including monetary forfeitures, for failure to comply with the FCC’s phase one or phase two requirements in all its markets.

Recent Events—Wireless Number Portability.  The FCC has adopted wireless number portability rules requiring wireless carriers to allow a customer to retain, subject to certain geographical limitations, their existing telephone number when switching from one telecommunications carrier to another. These rules have become effective for all U.S. Cellular markets on or before May 24, 2004. Now that wireless number portability has been implemented, FCC rules require that wireless providers and local exchange carriers, subject to certain exceptions, provide number portability in compliance with FCC performance criteria, upon request from another carrier.

24

U.S. Cellular has been successful in facilitating number portability requests in a timely manner. The implementation of wireless number portability has not had a material effect on U.S. Cellular’s results of operations to date. However, U.S. Cellular is unable to predict the impact that the implementation of number portability will have in the future. The implementation of wireless number portability may increase churn rates or customer retention costs for U.S. Cellular and other wireless companies, as the ability of customers to retain their wireless telephone numbers removes a significant barrier for customers who wish to change wireless carriers. However, to the extent U.S. Cellular loses customers, the effect may be offset to the extent it is able to obtain additional new customers who wish to change their service from other wireless carriers as a result of wireless number portability. The future volume of any porting requests, and the processing costs related thereto, may increase U.S. Cellular’s operating costs in the future. Any of the above factors could have an adverse effect on U.S. Cellular’s competitive position, costs of obtaining new subscribers, liquidity, financial position and results of operations.

Recent Events—Number Pooling.  Cellular and broadband personal communications service providers also had to be capable, by November 2002, of receiving from the numbering authorities telephone numbers in blocks of 1,000, rather than 10,000, as has been the case previously. This action was intended to conserve telephone numbers and extend the life of the current numbering system.

U.S. Cellular is now in compliance with the FCC’s thousand block number pooling requirements and the FCC’s current number portability requirements. Both requirements are complex and have required extensive capital investment. U.S. Cellular has completed the investments needed to meet these requirements as of December 31, 2004.

Recent Events—Reciprocal Compensation.  In another proceeding, the FCC in 1996 adopted rules regarding the method by which wireless carriers and local exchange carriers shall compensate each other for interconnecting wireless and local exchange facilities. The FCC rules provided for symmetrical and reciprocal compensation between local exchange carriers and wireless carriers, and also prescribed interim interconnection proxy rates, which are much lower than the rates formerly paid by wireless carriers to local exchange carriers. Symmetrical and reciprocal compensation means wireless carriers and local exchange carriers must pay each other at the same rate. Interconnection rate issues will be decided by the states. Wireless carriers are now paying and in the future can be expected to pay lower rates to local exchange carriers than they previously paid. This result was favorable to the wireless industry and somewhat unfavorable to local exchange carriers.

The FCC is currently considering a proposal to eliminate reciprocal compensation between wireless carriers and local exchange carriers and to move toward a so-called “bill and keep” system. If adopted, this change in the rules would also be favorable to wireless carriers, as wireless customers currently make more calls to wireline customers than vice versa.

In recent months, a controversy has arisen over the attempt by certain rural wireless carriers to impose state “wireless termination tariffs” in the absence of interconnection agreements. The legality of such tariffs is an issue before the FCC, and any changes are anticipated to be applied prospectively.

Recent Events—Outage Reporting.  The FCC has adopted rules, which took effect in January 2005, which require wireless carriers to report system “outages” affecting more than 30,000 customers for more than 30 minutes. Previously wireless carriers had not been subject to such requirements. U.S. Cellular is in compliance with the new requirements.

Telecommunications Act—General.  The primary purpose and effect of the Telecommunications Act is to open all telecommunications markets to competition. The Telecommunications Act makes most direct or indirect state and local barriers to competition unlawful. It directs the FCC to preempt all inconsistent state and local laws and regulations, after notice and comment proceedings. It also enables electric and other utilities to engage in telecommunications service through qualifying subsidiaries.

Only narrow powers over wireless carriers are left to state and local authorities. Each state retains the power to impose competitively neutral requirements that are consistent with the Telecommunications Act’s universal service provisions and necessary for universal services, public safety and welfare, continued service quality and consumer rights. While a state may not impose requirements that effectively function as barriers to entry, it retains limited authority to regulate certain competitive practices in rural telephone company service areas.

25

Telecommunications Act—Universal Service.  The Telecommunications Act establishes principles and a process for implementing a modified “universal service” policy. This policy seeks nationwide, affordable service and access to advanced telecommunications and information services. It calls for reasonably comparable urban and rural rates and services. The Telecommunications Act also requires universal service to schools, libraries and rural health facilities at discounted rates. Wireless carriers must provide such discounted rates to such organizations in accordance with federal regulations. The FCC has implemented the mandate of the Telecommunications Act to create a universal service support mechanism “to ensure that all Americans have access to telecommunications services.” The Telecommunications Act requires all interstate telecommunications providers, including wireless service providers, to “make an equitable and non-discriminatory contribution” to support the cost of providing universal service, unless their contribution would be de minimis. At present, the provision of landline telephone service in high cost areas is subsidized by support from the “universal service” fund, to which, as noted above, all carriers with interstate and international revenues must contribute. Such payments which were based on a percentage of the total “billed revenue” of carriers for a given previous period of time, began in 1998.

Since February 2003, such payments have been based on estimates of future revenues. Previously, these payments were based on historical revenues. Carriers are free to pass such charges on to their customers. Wireless carriers are also eligible to receive universal service support payments in certain circumstances if they provide specified services in “high cost” areas. U.S. Cellular has sought designation as an “eligible telecommunications carrier” qualified to receive universal service support in certain states, has been designated as such a carrier in the states of Washington, Iowa, and Wisconsin and has received payments for services provided to high cost areas within those states. Recently U.S. Cellular was also designated an eligible telecommunications carrier in Oregon and Oklahoma.

Communications Assistance to Law Enforcement Act.  Under a 1994 federal law, the Communications Assistance to Law Enforcement Act, all telecommunications carriers, including U.S. Cellular and other wireless licensees, have been required to implement certain equipment changes necessary to assist law enforcement authorities in achieving an enhanced ability to conduct electronic surveillance of those suspected of criminal activity. U.S. Cellular is now substantially in compliance with the requirements of such act. However, issues exist as to the applicability of such act to transmissions of “packet data” and other “information services.” U.S. Cellular will attempt to comply with the act’s “information service” requirements as they are clarified and become applicable. In August 2004, the FCC released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking which proposed new requirements with respect to “packet data” under this statute. It is expected that the FCC will adopt new regulations in 2005.

Other Recent FCC Actions.  The FCC has also taken action in proceedings: (1) to ensure that the customers of wireless providers, among other carriers, will receive complete, accurate, and understandable bills; (2) to establish safeguards to protect against unauthorized access to customer information; (3) to require improved access to telecommunications facilities by persons with disabilities; and (4) to set national policy for the allocation by state public utilities commissions of telephone numbers to wireline and wireless carriers.

The FCC adopted an order in January 2003, pursuant to which the mobile satellite service will permit its licensees to offer terrestrial wireless service in competition with commercial mobile radio service carriers, provided the mobile satellite service licensees also offer satellite telephone service, which will involve building their proposed satellite networks. Assuming the mobile satellite service licensees do build their satellite networks and thus obtain “ancillary terrestrial authority,” the increased competition could be unfavorable to existing commercial mobile radio service carriers. In November of 2004 the FCC granted, for the first time, authority for a Mobile Satellite System licensee to operate Ancillary Terrestrial Component facilities providing voice and data communication for users. This grant is significant because it confers nationwide blanket authority for the deployment of a new competitive terrestrial advanced wireless network. The timetable for its deployment is not yet known.

In January 2000, the FCC took an action which may have an impact on both cellular and personal communications service licensees. Pursuant to a congressional directive, the FCC adopted service rules for licensing the commercial use of 30 megahertz of spectrum in the 747-762 megahertz and 777-792 megahertz spectrum bands. Subsequently, the FCC adopted service rules for the 688-746 megahertz band, a portion of which was auctioned in 2002. The majority of the spectrum in these bands is being auctioned in large regional service areas, although there is a portion available which covers individual metropolitan statistical area and rural service area markets. The FCC has conducted two auctions for the metropolitan statistical area and rural service area licensed spectrum and certain other portions of the 688-746 megahertz spectrum which ended in September 2002 and June 2003, respectively. Additional auctions to license the 688-792 megahertz spectrum could commence as early as late 2006.

26

The FCC adopted service rules in October 2003 to provide for use of 90 megahertz of spectrum, 1710-1755 and 2110-2155 megahertz, for Advanced Wireless Services. This spectrum is intended to enable high-speed data services as well as full-motion video and other services. This spectrum could be auctioned starting late in the second quarter of 2006. The FCC also designated 30 megahertz of spectrum in the 1910-1920, 1990-2000, 2020-2025, and 2175-2180 megahertz bands for Advanced Wireless Services. The 1910-1915 and 1990-1995 megahertz bands, commonly referred to as the “G Block” will be licensed to Nextel on a nationwide basis in exchange for relinquishing spectrum holdings in other bands. The balance of this spectrum (commonly known as the “H” and “J” blocks) could be auctioned as early as the fourth quarter of 2005, subject to the resolution of industry concerns about interference with existing services in the PCS band.

In June 2002, the FCC created a Spectrum Policy Task Force and commenced proceedings to review and make recommendations on broad categories of possible spectrum policy change. The allocation of additional spectrum for unlicensed services, which has been strongly promoted by various manufacturers of 802.11b devices and Wi-Fi service providers, has emerged from that review process as a potentially significant shift in FCC spectrum policy affecting wireless competition between carriers who paid for spectrum and those who plan to implement networks using unlicensed free spectrum. The FCC commenced proceedings in December 2002 to allocate additional spectrum in the television broadcast bands as well as the 3650-3700 megahertz band for unlicensed services which remain pending. In November 2003 the FCC approved a significant expansion of the spectrum available for unlicensed uses by permitting 802.11b and Wi-Fi operations in the 5.4-5.7 gigahertz band.

The FCC adopted in May 2003 new spectrum leasing policies which permit licensees of cellular, personal communications service, and specialized mobile radio spectrum, among other bands, to lease to third parties any amount of spectrum in any geographic area encompassed by their licenses, and for any period of time not extending beyond the current term of the license. The FCC has also adopted streamlined processing rules for applications for assignment and transfer of control of telecommunications carrier licenses. These new rules and policies were expanded and clarified by the FCC in July of 2004 to permit spectrum leasing in additional wireless services, to streamline processing of spectrum leasing applications as well as traditional license transfers and assignments and to establish new categories of spectrum leasing arrangements.

The FCC also adopted in June 2004 new service rules for multipoint distribution service, microwave multipoint distribution service and instructional television fixed service spectrum in the 2150-2162 megahertz and 2495-2690 megahertz bands which will foster uses of this spectrum for advanced wireless services, including commercial mobile services. This spectrum could create opportunities for new or expanded competition with existing commercial mobile radio service operators.

State and Local Regulation.  U.S. Cellular is also subject to state and local regulation in some instances. In 1981, the FCC preempted the states from exercising jurisdiction in the areas of licensing, technical standards and market structure. In 1993, Congress preempted states from regulating the entry of wireless systems into service and the rates charged by wireless systems to customers. The siting and construction of wireless facilities, including transmitter towers, antennas and equipment shelters are still subject to state or local zoning and land use regulations. However, in 1996, Congress amended the Communications Act to provide that states could not discriminate against wireless carriers in tower zoning proceedings and had to decide on zoning requests with reasonable speed. In addition, states may still regulate other terms and conditions of wireless service.

In 2000, the FCC ruled that the preemption provisions of the Communications Act do not preclude the states from acting under state tort, contract, and consumer protection laws to regulate the practices of commercial mobile radio service carriers, even if such activities might have an incidental effect on wireless rates. This ruling has led to more state regulation of commercial mobile radio service carriers, particularly from the standpoint of consumer protection. Although U.S. Cellular intends to vigorously defend its activities, there can be no assurance that potential state regulatory proceedings and/or consumer lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, business or prospects.

The FCC is required to forbear from applying any statutory or regulatory provision that is not necessary to keep telecommunications rates and terms reasonable or to protect consumers. A state may not apply a statutory or regulatory provision that the FCC decides to forbear from applying. In addition, the FCC must review its telecommunications regulations every two years and change any that are no longer necessary. Further, the FCC is empowered under certain circumstances to preempt state regulatory authorities if a state is obstructing the Communications Act’s basic purposes.

27

U.S. Cellular and its subsidiaries have been and intend to remain active participants in proceedings before the FCC and state regulatory authorities. Proceedings with respect to the foregoing policy issues before the FCC and state regulatory authorities could have a significant impact on the competitive market structure among wireless providers and the relationships between wireless providers and other carriers. U.S. Cellular is unable to predict the scope, pace or financial impact of policy changes which could be adopted in these proceedings.

Radio Frequency Emissions.  The FCC has adopted rules specifying standards and the methods to be used in evaluating radio frequency emissions from radio equipment, including network equipment and handsets used in connection with commercial mobile radio service. These rules were upheld on appeal by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to review the Second Circuit’s ruling. U.S. Cellular’s network facilities and the handsets it sells to customers comply with these standards.

On December 7, 2004, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld in EMR Network v. FCC, the FCC’s current requirements regarding radio frequency emissions and held that the FCC was not obliged to commence inquiry into the non-thermal effects of radio frequency emissions. The court also evaluated the studies relied upon by the plaintiffs and concluded they were insufficient. The FCC is however considering changes in its rules regarding human exposure to radio frequency magnetic fields in a separate proceeding.

Media reports have suggested that radio frequency emissions from handsets, wireless data devices and cell sites may raise various health concerns, including cancer or tumors, and may interfere with various electronic medical devices, including hearing aids and pacemakers. Although some studies have suggested that radio frequency emissions may cause certain biological effects, most of the expert reviews conducted to date have concluded that the evidence does not support a finding of adverse health effects but that further research is appropriate. Research and studies are ongoing. These concerns over radio frequency emissions may discourage the use of handsets and wireless data devices and may result in significant restrictions on the location and operation of cell sites, all of which could have a material adverse effect on U.S. Cellular’s results of operations. Several class action and single-plaintiff lawsuits have been filed against several other wireless service operators and several wireless phone manufacturers, asserting product liability, breach of warranty and other claims relating to radio frequency transmissions to and from handsets and wireless data devices. The lawsuits seek substantial monetary damages as well as injunctive relief. One important case in which the plaintiff alleged that his brain tumor had been caused by his wireless telephone use, Newman v. Verizon et al, was dismissed in the U.S. District Court in Maryland in October 2002. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the dismissal in October 2003. In addition, several other cases are pending or on appeal or have been dismissed and may be appealed. There can be no assurance that the outcome of these or other lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on the wireless industry, including U.S. Cellular. Currently, U.S. Cellular carries insurance with respect to such matters, but there is no assurance that such insurance would be sufficient, will continue to be available or will not be cost-prohibitive in the future.

Competition

U.S. Cellular competes directly with several wireless communication service providers, including enhanced specialized mobile radio service providers, in each of its markets. In general, there are between five and seven competitors in each wireless market. U.S. Cellular generally competes against each of the near-nationwide wireless companies: Verizon Wireless, Sprint (and affiliates) (“Sprint”), Cingular (which recently acquired AT&T Wireless), T-Mobile USA Inc. and Nextel Communications (“Nextel”). However, not all of these competitors operate in each market where U.S. Cellular does business. These competitors have substantially greater financial, technical, marketing, sales, purchasing and distribution resources than U.S. Cellular. In addition, Sprint recently proposed to acquire Nextel which would likely increase this competitor’s access to such resources.

The use of national advertising and promotional programs by the near-national wireless operators may be a source of additional competitive and pricing pressures in all U.S. Cellular markets, even if those operators may not provide service in a particular market. U.S. Cellular provides wireless services comparable to the national competitors, but the other wireless companies operate in a wider geographic area and are able to offer no- or low-cost roaming and long-distance calling packages over a wider area on their own networks than U.S. Cellular can offer on its network. If U.S. Cellular offers the same calling area as one of these competitors, U.S. Cellular will incur roaming charges for calls made in portions of the calling area which are not part of its network.

28

In the Midwest, U.S. Cellular’s largest contiguous service area, it can offer larger regional service packages without incurring significant roaming charges than it is able to offer in other parts of its network. U.S. Cellular also employs a customer satisfaction strategy throughout its markets it believes has contributed to a relatively low churn rate and has had a positive impact on its cost to acquire and serve customers.

Some of U.S. Cellular’s competitors bundle other services, such as landline telephone service and internet access, with their wireless communications services, which U.S. Cellular either does not have the ability to offer or has chosen not to offer.

In addition, U.S. Cellular competes against both larger and smaller regional wireless companies in certain areas, including ALLTEL, Western Wireless Corporation and Rural Cellular Corporation, and against resellers of wireless services. Since each of these competitors operates on systems using spectrum licensed by the FCC and has comparable technology and facilities, competition for customers among these systems in each market is principally on the basis of quality of service, price, size of area covered, services offered and responsiveness of customer service. ALLTEL has recently agreed to acquire Western Wireless Corporation, which would likely increase this competitor’s access to financial, technical, marketing, sales, purchasing and distribution resources, although the two companies do not generally have overlapping service territories.

Since U.S. Cellular’s competitors do not disclose their subscriber counts in specific regional service areas, market share for the competitors in each regional market cannot be precisely determined.

The FCC’s rules require all operational wireless systems to provide, on a nondiscriminatory basis, wireless service to resellers which purchase blocks of mobile telephone numbers from an operational system and then resell them to the public. Certain of these resellers (also referred to as mobile virtual network operators), such as Virgin Mobile, Boost Wireless and Qwest Corporation, have grown substantial customer bases through the leveraging of existing brand names and have proven to be competitive with U.S. Cellular in certain of its operating markets. Others, such as Disney Corporation’s ESPN brand, plan to use their brand recognition and access to content to compete in the wireless arena in the future.

In recent years, enhanced specialized mobile radio providers have initiated that type of service and also offer conventional wireless service in substantially all of U.S. Cellular’s markets. Although less directly a substitute for other wireless services, wireless data services and paging services may be adequate for those who do not need full two-way voice service. Technological advances or regulatory changes in the future may make available other alternatives to wireless service, thereby creating additional sources of competition.

Continuing technological advances in the communications field make it difficult to predict the extent of additional future competition for wireless systems. For example, the FCC has allocated radio channels to mobile satellite systems in which transmissions from mobile units to satellites would augment or replace transmissions to cell sites. Such systems are designed primarily to serve the communications needs of remote locations and mobile satellite systems could provide viable competition for land-based wireless systems in such areas. Some initial deployments have been made and service is now being provided in certain areas. It is also possible that the FCC may in the future assign additional frequencies to wireless telephone service or enhanced specialized mobile radio service to provide for more competitors in each market.

29

TDS Telecom Operations

Overview

TDS’s wireline telephone operations are conducted through TDS Telecom and its subsidiaries. TDS Telecom is a wholly owned subsidiary of TDS. TDS Telecom’s corporate headquarters are located in Madison, Wisconsin. TDS Telecom is a holding company which, through its affiliates, provides high-quality telecommunication services, including full-service local exchange service, long distance telephone service, and Internet access, to rural and suburban communities. TDS Telecom has 111 telephone company subsidiaries that are incumbent local exchange carriers. An incumbent local exchange carrier is an independent local telephone company that formerly had the exclusive right and responsibility to provide local transmission and switching services in its designated service territory. TDS Telecom served approximately 730,400 equivalent access lines in 28 states through its incumbent local exchange carrier subsidiaries at December 31, 2004. An equivalent access line is derived by converting a high capacity data line to an estimated equivalent, in terms of capacity, number of switched access lines. TDS Telecom also provides telecommunications services as a competitive local exchange carrier through its subsidiary, TDS Metrocom.

The table below sets forth, as of December 31, 2004, the ten largest states of TDS Telecom’s operations based on the number of equivalent access lines and the total number of equivalent access lines operated by all of the telephone subsidiaries of TDS Telecom.

State	Number of Equivalent Access Lines at December 31, 2004	% of Total
Wisconsin	380,034	32.8	%
Minnesota	121,640	10.5	%
Michigan	119,695	10.3	%
Tennessee	112,518	9.7	%
Georgia	56,933	4.9	%
New Hampshire	39,464	3.4	%
Indiana	35,447	3.1	%
Illinois	29,159	2.6	%
Maine	28,972	2.5	%
Alabama	28,598	2.5	%
Total for 10 Largest States	952,460	82.3	%
Other States	204,740	17.7	%
Total	1,157,200	100.0	%

Each TDS Telecom incumbent local exchange carrier provides consumers and businesses with landline local telephone service through its switching and intra-city network. Long distance or toll service is provided through connections with long distance carriers which purchase network access from the TDS Telecom incumbent local exchange carriers and by TDS Telecom’s own long distance unit, set up in 2000 to resell long distance service in its incumbent local exchange carrier markets. The long distance unit served 295,000 long distance customers at December 31, 2004, and 230,500 at December 31, 2003. Beginning January 1, 2004, long distance customers reflect those lines that have chosen TDS Telecom as their primary interexchange carrier. Prior to that, a count of customers was used.

In 1998, TDS Telecom affiliates began providing telecommunications services as a competitive local exchange carrier in the greater Madison and Appleton areas of Wisconsin under the TDS Metrocom brand name and in Minnesota markets including Minneapolis/St. Paul under the USLink brand name. Competitive local exchange carrier is a term that depicts companies that enter the operating areas of incumbent local exchange carriers to offer local exchange and other telephone services. In 2001, TDS Metrocom began providing service in Lake County, Illinois and southern Michigan. In 2004, TDS Telecom began using the brand name TDS Metrocom for services provided in Minnesota and North Dakota. TDS Telecom served approximately 426,800 equivalent access lines through its competitive local exchange carrier subsidiary at December 31, 2004, an increase from 364,800 at December 31, 2003.

Future growth in telephone operations is expected to be derived from providing service to new or presently underserved customers, expanding service in the areas currently served by TDS Telecom, upgrading existing customers to higher grades of service and increasing penetration of services. Additionally, growth may be derived from new services made possible by advances in technology, and the acquisition or development of additional incumbent local exchange carrier and competitive local exchange carrier operations.

30

TDS Telecom is committed to offering its customers a full complement of wired telecommunications services and bundles those services in customer friendly packages to provide a single source for its customers’ telecommunication needs. TDS Telecom intends to provide its customers with expanded communications products and services covering their local, long distance, Internet and data needs.

The following table summarizes certain information regarding TDS Telecom’s incumbent local exchange carrier (“ILEC”) and competitive local exchange carrier (“CLEC”) telephone and Internet operations:

	Year Ended or At December 31,
	2004 (as restated)			2003 (as restated)			2002 (as restated)			2001 (as restated)			2000 (as restated)
	(Dollars in thousands)
ILEC Equivalent Access Lines (1)	730,400			722,200			711,200			678,300			619,600
% Residential	78.3		%	78.1		%	74.9		%	74.8		%	75.8		%
% Business (nonresidential)	21.7		%	21.9		%	25.1		%	25.2		%	24.2		%
CLEC Equivalent Access Lines (1)	426,800			364,800			291,400			192,100			112,100
Dial-up Internet Customers:
ILEC	101,300			112,900			117,600			117,500			72,100
CLEC	18,200			22,200			24,700			13,700			11,200
Digital Subscriber Line Customers:
ILEC	41,900			23,600			9,100			2,200			22
CLEC	29,000			20,100			11,800			6,800			2,300
ILEC Long Distance Customers (2)	295,000			230,500			197,500			125,300			40,500
Consolidated:
Total revenues	$	880,145		$	862,988		$	801,530		$	694,215		$	610,924
Depreciation and amortization expense	170,014			163,399			159,291			149,361			133,445
Operating income	37,070			151,287			105,408			119,175			127,917
Construction expenditures	138,247			139,218			168,405			196,816			150,602
Business segment assets	$	1,930,255		$	2,045,246		$	2,106,591		$	1,742,392		$	1,366,427
ILEC:
Total revenues	$	658,330		$	653,038		$	626,865		$	576,850		$	529,061
Depreciation and amortization expense	131,665			130,036			130,232			131,787			124,389
Operating income	183,178			177,144			167,651			161,756			142,380
Construction expenditures	103,069			111,924			116,486			99,866			93,401
Business segment assets	$	1,775,968		$	1,807,116		$	1,857,927		$	1,526,962		$	1,244,589
CLEC:
Total revenues	$	226,259		$	213,800		$	177,166		$	119,282		$	85,348
Depreciation and amortization expense	38,349			33,363			29,059			17,574			9,056
Operating (loss)	(146,108		)	(25,857		)	(62,243		)	(42,581		)	(14,463		)
Construction expenditures	35,178			27,294			51,919			96,950			57,201
Business segment assets	154,287			238,130			248,664			215,430			121,838
Intra-company Revenue Elimination	$	(4,444	)	$	(3,850	)	$	(2,501	)	$	(1,917	)	$	(3,485	)

(1)An “access line” is a single or multi-party circuit between the customer’s establishment and the central switching office. Access line equivalents are derived by converting high capacity data lines to the estimated capacity of one switched access line.

(2)Beginning January 1, 2004, long distance customers reflect those lines that have chosen TDS Telecom as their primary interexchange carrier. Prior to that, a count of customers was used.

31

Business Strategy

TDS Telecom has produced revenue growth in its incumbent local exchange carrier markets by providing its customers with state-of-the-art telecommunications solutions, maintaining a high quality of on-going service and selectively acquiring local telephone companies. Management believes that TDS Telecom has a number of advantages as an incumbent local exchange carrier, including a modern network substantially upgraded to provide a variety of advanced calling services, a strong local presence and an established brand name. However, the competitive environment in the telecommunications industry has changed significantly as a result of technological advances, changing customer requirements and regulatory activities. In response to this challenging competitive environment, TDS Telecom’s business plan is designed for a full-service telecommunications company, including competitive local exchange carrier operations, by leveraging TDS Telecom’s strength as an incumbent local exchange carrier. The business plan provides for TDS Telecom to meet these challenges in several areas:

•Growing and protecting TDS Telecom’s core incumbent local exchange carrier business while leveraging its strengths as a competitive local exchange carrier;

•Championing TDS Telecom’s position to secure favorable regulatory treatment and preservation of its revenue streams;

•Developing, deploying, and marketing high-growth new services with an emphasis on data;

•Developing clusters of operations which expand its geographic footprint in areas where it can best leverage existing assets; and

•Creating efficiencies by optimizing cross-functional processes that have the potential for productivity improvement.

Both incumbent local exchange carriers and competitive local exchange carriers are faced with significant challenges, including the industry decline in use of second lines by customers, growing competition from wireless and other wireline providers, changes in regulation, new technologies such as Voice Over Internet Protocol, and the uncertainty in the economy. These challenges could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of TDS Telecom.

Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier Segment

TDS Telecom’s goal is to be a leading integrated wired communications provider in its incumbent local exchange carrier markets. As of December 31, 2003, TDS Telecom was the sixth largest non-Bell local exchange telephone company in the United States based upon a survey by United States Telecommunications Association. This ranking was based on the number of telephone access lines served. Virtually all of TDS Telecom’s access lines are served by digital switching technology, which, in conjunction with other technologies, allows TDS Telecom to offer additional premium services to its customers. These services include call forwarding, conference calling, caller identification (with and without name identification), selective call ringing and call waiting.

As operating companies of one of the major independent local exchange holding companies in the United States, TDS Telecom’s incumbent local exchange carriers provide both local telephone service and access to the long distance network for customers in their respective service areas. The incumbent local exchange carriers also provide directory advertising through a contract with another company, and billing and collection services to interexchange carriers. Interexchange carriers are telephone companies that are allowed to provide long distance telephone service between local exchange areas. TDS Telecom provides centralized administrative and support services to field operations from its corporate offices in Madison, Wisconsin.

Core Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier Business Objectives

TDS Telecom is focused on achieving three central strategic objectives: growth, market leadership, and profitability. Management believes that this strategy encompasses many components including the customers within the market, market strategy, federal support revenues, acquisition plans, competitors, and construction and development. These facets of the business are all impacted by regulations imposed by the FCC and state regulatory authorities, as discussed below. Each component identified is discussed in detail below.

32

Retail and Wholesale Markets

TDS Telecom’s incumbent local exchange carrier retail presence includes 109 sales and service offices in 28 states. These offices serve both residential and business customers. Approximately 78% of TDS Telecom’s equivalent access lines serve residential customers and approximately 22% serve business customers. Retail market customers are composed primarily of residential customers and businesses, government and institutional telecommunications users.

The retail market customer base is a mix of rural and suburban customers, with significant concentrations in the Upper Midwest and in the Southeast. Approximately 72% of TDS Telecom’s residential customers live in rural areas, while the other 28% are located in suburban settings. TDS Telecom’s promotional and sales strategy for the retail customer consists of two major initiatives: building brand equity by creating awareness of the TDS Telecom brand name and using direct marketing to sell specific products and product groupings. The nature of TDS Telecom’s markets has historically made direct marketing more effective than mass media such as radio and television. In addressing its consumer markets, TDS Telecom has made extensive and aggressive use of direct mail. It has been more selective, though still active, in the use of telemarketing as a means of generating awareness, qualified leads, and actual sales. Newspaper advertising is used as well. TDS Telecom also continues to explore new ways of marketing to its customers in anticipation of changing rules and changing customer media habits. Uniform branding has made the use of mass media more attractive, and TDS Telecom has increasingly incorporated these elements into its media mix.

Most business customers could be described as small to medium sized businesses or small office/home office type customers. TDS Telecom focuses its marketing on information-intensive industries such as financial services, health services, realty, hotels and motels, education and government. TDS Telecom uses its direct sales force, targeted mailings, and telemarketing to sell products and services to the commercial markets, which are segmented into tiers based on size and strategic importance. Different sales and distribution channels are employed for each segment. Account executives focus on the most profitable customers by staying in contact with them on a regular basis. TDS Telecom employs a performance based compensation plan for its account executives targeted at profitable revenue and customer satisfaction results.

In nearly all of its markets, TDS Telecom offers the complete family of custom calling services, including call waiting, call forwarding, three-way calling, and speed dialing. TDS Telecom’s advanced calling services family of products is centered around Caller ID service. In 2004 and 2003, the advanced calling services family of services was available to 99% of the lines in service, and penetration of Caller ID increased to 36% from 33% of lines equipped.

TDS Telecom’s wholesale presence involves a diverse customer base. Wholesale market services have traditionally provided a majority of TDS Telecom’s revenues. TDS Telecom receives much of its incumbent local exchange carrier revenue from the sale of traditional wholesale services, such as access services and billing and collections services to the interexchange carriers. As a result, TDS Telecom continues to provide a high level of service to traditional interexchange carrier wholesale customers such as AT&T, MCI, Sprint and the Regional Bell Operating Companies. Recent and proposed regulatory changes discussed below may affect the sources of TDS Telecom’s independent local exchange carriers’ revenues.

The wholesale market focus is on access revenues. TDS Telecom’s operating telephone subsidiaries receive access revenue as compensation for carrying interstate and intrastate long distance traffic on their networks. Access services, billing and collection services and other primarily traditional wholesale offerings generated $339 million, or approximately 52% of TDS Telecom’s incumbent local exchange carrier revenue for the year ended December 31, 2004, compared to $342 million or approximately 52% in 2003. The interstate and intrastate access rates charged include the cost of providing service plus a fair rate of return, as defined in Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier Regulation.

The FCC’s re-examination of all currently regulated forms of access is ongoing. The FCC is currently considering whether and how to reform the charges between carriers for use of each other’s networks. One proposal under consideration is to replace the current system of interexchange carriers paying local carriers for access with a system referred to as “bill and keep,” which would eliminate access charge payments by interexchange carriers and require the local carrier to recover its costs for providing access either from its customers or from a government fund. The FCC is also considering whether to regulate companies that provide Voice Over Internet Protocol as telecommunications service providers and therefore subject that service to access charges for Voice Over Internet traffic. If the FCC adopts changes in access charge regulations that reduce the revenues from interstate access charges, these changes could have a material adverse impact on TDS Telecom. TDS Telecom may attempt to replace lost access revenues through charges to customers or through universal service support payments.

33

Where applicable and subject to state regulatory approval, TDS Telecom’s incumbent local exchange subsidiaries utilize intrastate access tariffs and participate in intrastate revenue pools. However, many intrastate toll revenue pooling arrangements, formerly sources of substantial revenues to TDS Telecom’s incumbent local exchange companies, were replaced with access charge based arrangements designed to generate revenue flows similar to those previously realized in the pooling process. Numerous states where TDS Telecom operates are considering ways to lower intrastate access rates, which may result in lost access revenues. To the extent that state ordered access charge revisions reduce revenues, TDS Telecom may seek adjustments in other rates, drawing from a state high cost fund or charging a state subscriber line charge to offset access charge reductions.

Given the above-mentioned uncertainties for both interstate and intrastate access revenues, there can be no assurance that TDS Telecom will be able to obtain favorable adjustments in other rates to replace lost revenues. If TDS Telecom is unable to replace lost access charge revenues with increased revenues in other areas, this could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Market Strategy

TDS Telecom has three primary goals to support its grow and protect strategy. The goals are to build customer loyalty, grow revenues and control costs. Management of TDS Telecom believes it can achieve these goals by offering new and updated products and services. This will be achieved by:

•Providing superior customer service to its retail customers;

•Building brand equity in the TDS Telecom brand name; and

•Creating value added packages and bundles.

Customer Service.  TDS Telecom distinguishes itself by the way customer service is offered to its retail customers. TDS Telecom operates independent local exchange carriers in 28 states with a local sales and service office in the majority of its markets. This combination provides TDS Telecom’s retail customers with product offers generally associated with large companies. It also provides the high levels of personal customer service generally associated with small companies. TDS Telecom’s professional service representatives and field representatives both live and work in the communities served. TDS Telecom believes that its strength in two key areas—product/price and customer service—provides a fundamental competitive advantage for TDS Telecom.

Brand Equity.  TDS Telecom continued to build on the branding process by increasing its Internet web presence. TDS Telecom’s web site offers product and service information, company information, product/service ordering capability, e-service options, and account management. TDS Telecom continues to leverage its sales and marketing messages through cost-effective public relations activities and messages. For example, TDS Telecom is in partnership with collegiate athletics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and University of Minnesota for advertising and signage in the sports arenas and other very visible spots, which will increase awareness of the company brand with customers and potential customers. Management of TDS Telecom believes that branding will increase the loyalty of its customers and reduce expenses through more cost-effective marketing.

Value Added Product Bundles and Packages.  Management of TDS Telecom believes that its consumer and business customers have a strong preference to purchase all of their telecommunications services from a single provider. TDS Telecom believes that by offering a full complement of wired telecommunications services and bundling those services in customer friendly packages, it can build customer loyalty and reduce customer churn. TDS Telecom continued its enhancement of its product offerings started in 2003, with the launch of several residential and business product/service bundles. These bundles include basic telephone services, Internet services and long distance services. TDS Telecom also continued expansion of its digital subscriber line markets. TDS Telecom continued to expand its presence in the data market with virtual private networks and Internet co-location products. A virtual private network provides connectivity between two points using the public Internet as the transport mechanism. Co-location provides customer web server hosting at a TDS facility, providing rack space, Internet bandwidth, and environmental facilities. TDS Telecom continued to grow its long distance venture and believes it is now the number one long distance provider in its franchise territory based on comparisons of the aggregate number of long distance customers it serves with the number of long distance customers disclosed by other companies in their publicly released information.

34

Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier Markets Technology

In 2004, TDS Telecom continued its program of enhancing and expanding its service-providing network. TDS Telecom intends to meet competition by providing its customers with high-quality telecommunications services and building its network to take full advantage of advanced telecommunications technologies such as:

•Fiber optic fed digital serving areas. A digital serving area is a defined geographic area within an exchange that is served by a digital loop carrier system. The digital loop carrier system extends the line-side hardware of the central switch to the defined geographic area. Having this capability allows the expansion of services (such as higher data rates) to a greater number of customers residing at a distance from the central office switching equipment;

•Digital subscriber lines, which use a technology that provides a high-speed data access channel between the customer’s personal computer and the equipment located at the central office. This technology is supported on ordinary copper telephone lines using a digital modem at the customer premise and a similar modem located at the central office or digital serving area; and

•Fiber to the premises, which use passive optic network technology to significantly increase the bandwidth to each household or business. In 2004, TDS Telecom installed fiber to the home lines in three new subdivisions to pilot the potential for this emerging technology.

During 2004, TDS Telecom continued to launch digital subscriber line service in its markets, bringing total markets served to 81. While digital subscriber line technology has distance limitations and not all subscribers will have access to high-speed Internet services, current generation technology allows for deployment of high-speed Internet service in digital serving areas with suitably equipped line concentrators.

As TDS Telecom continues to upgrade and expand its network, it is also standardizing equipment and processes to increase efficiency and utilizes centralized monitoring and management of its network to reduce costs and improve service reliability. This network standardization has assisted TDS Telecom in operating its 24-hours-a-day/7-days-per-week Network Management Center. The Network Management Center continuously monitors the network in an effort to proactively identify and correct network faults prior to any customer impact.

TDS Telecom’s expected incumbent local exchange carrier capital spending in 2005 is $120 million to $130 million, compared to actual capital expenditures of $103.1 million in 2004 and $111.9 million in 2003. Financing for the 2005 capital additions will be provided primarily by cash flows from operations.

Federal Financing

The Rural Utilities Service (“RUS”), the Rural Telephone Bank (“RTB”) and the Federal Financing Bank (“FFB”), agencies of the United States of America, have been TDS Telecom’s primary external sources of long-term financing for additions to telephone plant and equipment. The RUS has made primarily 35-year loans to telephone companies since 1949, at interest rates of 2% and 5%, for the purpose of improving telephone service in rural areas. Currently, the RUS is authorized to issue hardship loans at a 5% interest rate and other loans at an interest rate approximating the government’s rate for instruments of comparable maturity.

Substantially all of TDS Telecom’s telephone plant was pledged under, or was otherwise subject to, mortgages securing obligations of the incumbent local exchange carriers to the RUS, RTB and FFB as of December 31, 2004. The amount of dividends on common stock that may be paid by the operating telephone companies is limited by certain financial requirements set forth in the mortgages. In any calendar year, companies with greater than 40% net worth to total assets can distribute the entire amount above 40%. The majority of TDS Telecom’s telephone subsidiaries exceed this percentage. Approximately $985.5 million may be paid as dividends from the operating subsidiaries to TDS Telecom as of December 31, 2004.

In January 2005, the TDS Board of Directors authorized a committee of the TDS Board of Directors to approve the repayment of some or all of TDS Telecom’s notes issued under certain loan agreements with the Rural Utilities Service, Rural Electrification Administration, Rural Telephone Bank, Federal Financing Bank, Rural Telephone Finance Cooperative, and/or other federal government or government-sponsored entities. As of March 1, 2005, the committee has taken no action to cause TDS Telecom loans to be repaid.

35

Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier Markets Competition

The Telecommunications Act of 1996 initiated a process of transformation in the telecommunications industry. Public policy has for some time embraced the dual objectives of universal service and competition for long distance services and, to a more limited extent, permitted some local service competition, for example, from wireless providers. The Telecommunications Act of 1996, however, established local competition as a national telecommunications policy. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 requires non-exempt incumbent local exchange carriers to provide “reasonable and non-discriminatory” interconnection services and access to unbundled network elements to any competitive local exchange carrier that seeks to enter the incumbent local exchange carrier’s market. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 also allows competitive local exchange carriers to collocate network equipment in incumbent local exchange carrier central offices and prevents incumbent local exchange carriers and competitive local exchange carriers from unduly restricting each other from the use of facilities or information that enable competition. The FCC has adopted rules implementing the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and establishing the price that incumbent carriers are able to charge for interconnection and providing elements of the network, and those rules and pricing policies have been upheld by the United States Supreme Court. However, because all of the TDS Telecom incumbent local exchange carriers are rural telephone companies, they currently remain exempt from the most burdensome market opening requirements (except for Mid-Plains Telephone, LLC in Wisconsin, which no longer is subject to the general rural exemption). See the Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier Regulation section below for a discussion on rural exemptions. The exemption rules, coupled with the challenging economics of competing in lower population density markets and the high service quality TDS Telecom provides, have delayed wireline competitive local exchange carriers’ competitive entry into most of TDS Telecom’s incumbent local exchange markets. Also, on December 15, 2004, the FCC adopted an Order promulgating new unbundling rules to replace earlier rules vacated by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. These new rules relaxed some, but not all, of the unbundling requirements previously imposed upon incumbent local exchange carriers, thus making it more challenging generally for competing carriers to offer service without constructing their own facilities. TDS Telecom has experienced some reductions in the rate of physical access line growth, due in part to the economy and in part to competitors such as cable providers which offer high-speed Internet service via cable modems, wireless carriers which offer nationwide calling plans, and Voice Over Internet Protocol providers. TDS Telecom continues to actively deploy its own high-speed Internet product offering (digital subscriber line service) in its markets to meet its customers’ broadband needs.

TDS Telecom expects competition in the telecommunications industry to continue to develop in the coming years, especially in the larger urban areas and from wireless service providers, some of which have been classified as competitive eligible telecommunications carriers and thus able to receive universal service support based on the costs of the incumbent local carrier serving the market and receiving high cost support. Many competitive local exchange carrier business models have been tried, and a number of those companies have been forced to declare bankruptcy. However, some of those companies are now emerging from bankruptcy with relatively low debt and their ability to compete in the market, and the effect of their participation on prices and market competition, is uncertain. TDS Telecom’s strategy for retaining its incumbent local exchange carrier customer base is to build customer loyalty by 1) providing superior service quality and customer care, 2) capitalizing on its local presence in the communities it serves, and 3) offering a suite of products and services bundled in response to customer preferences. There can be no assurance that TDS Telecom’s strategy will be successful.

Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier Regulation

TDS Telecom subsidiaries are primarily incumbent local exchange carriers, the traditional regulated local telephone companies in their communities. TDS Telecom’s incumbent local exchange subsidiaries are regulated by federal and state regulatory agencies, and TDS Telecom seeks to maintain positive relationships with these regulators. Rates, including local rates, intrastate toll rates and intrastate access charges, are subject to state commission approval in most states. The regulators also establish and oversee implementation of the provisions of the federal and state telecommunications laws, including interconnection requirements, universal service obligations, promotion of competition, and the deployment of advanced services. The regulators enforce these provisions with orders and sometimes financial penalties. TDS Telecom will continue to pursue desired changes in rate structures and regulation to attempt to maintain affordable rates and reasonable earnings.

36

TDS Telecom has also elected alternative forms of regulation for its subsidiaries in several states and will continue to evaluate whether to pursue alternative regulation for the remaining subsidiaries. For those subsidiaries where alternative regulation is elected, TDS Telecom will need to ensure compliance within the constraints imposed, while taking advantage of the opportunities afforded under alternative regulation. While subsidiaries in those states under alternative regulation will not face as much regulatory scrutiny of their earnings, the subsidiaries in the remaining states will continue to file rate cases and face earnings reviews by the state regulatory commissions. Over the next several years, TDS Telecom will continue to manage these planned traditional rate cases, as well as respond to commission initiated earnings reviews. Furthermore, other regulatory issues will need to be addressed, such as responding to the financial impacts of universal service and access charge reform, local number portability, regulation of new competitors (e.g. Voice Over Internet Protocol providers) and changes to industry settlements.

For the TDS Telecom incumbent local exchange companies, state regulators must generally approve rate adjustments, service areas, service standards and accounting methods, and are authorized to limit the return on capital based upon allowable levels. In some states, construction plans, borrowing, depreciation rates, affiliated charge transactions and certain other financial transactions are also subject to regulatory approval. States traditionally designated a single incumbent local exchange carrier as the universal service provider in a local market and then regulated the entry of additional competing providers into the same local market. The Telecommunications Act of 1996, however, has largely pre-empted state authority over market entry. While a state may not impose requirements that effectively function as barriers to entry, and the FCC must pre-empt challenged state requirements if they impose such barriers to entry, a state still retains authority to regulate competitive practices in rural telephone company service areas.

Most of the TDS Telecom incumbent local exchange companies participate in both the National Exchange Carrier Association interstate common line and traffic sensitive access charge tariffs. TDS Telecom’s incumbent local exchange carriers also participate in the access revenue pools administered by the FCC-supervised National Exchange Carrier Association, which collects and distributes the revenues from interstate access charges. The FCC retains minimal regulatory oversight over interstate toll rates and other issues relating to interstate telephone service, but continues to regulate the interstate access system.

On November 8, 2001, the FCC issued an order that changed interstate access rates for rate-of-return regulated incumbent local exchange carriers including the TDS Telecom incumbent local exchange carriers. The changes reduced per minute access charges paid by long distance carriers and raised business and residential subscriber line charges. To implement one of the provisions in the Telecommunications Act through this order, the FCC removed “implicit support” from the access charge system, implemented a new universal service fund and preserved the current 11.25% interstate rate of return. The FCC is now examining incentive-type regulation for rate of return carriers, but the prospect for action is uncertain.

As noted previously, the FCC’s re-examination of all currently regulated forms of intercarrier compensation is ongoing. Additional questions have arisen about what compensation wireless carriers and Voice Over Internet Protocol providers should pay for the long distance traffic that incumbent local exchange carriers terminate for such wireless carriers’ and Voice Over Internet Protocol providers’ customers. More broadly, the FCC is currently considering how and whether to change the system of compensating carriers for use of each other’s networks. One proposal under consideration is to replace the current system of interexchange carriers paying local carriers for access with a system referred to as “bill and keep”, which would eliminate access charge payments by interexchange carriers and require the local company to recover its costs for providing access from its customers or, for rural and high-cost carriers, from a government fund. The FCC is also considering whether to regulate Voice Over Internet Protocol providers as telecommunications service providers and therefore make them subject to access charges for Voice Over Internet Protocol traffic that terminates on the public switch network. TDS Telecom believes that its incumbent local exchange carriers need to be adequately compensated for the use of their networks.

The FCC and the telecommunications industry spent much of the past year discussing intercarrier compensation issues, and action is possible but not certain in 2005. The TDS Telecom incumbent local exchange carriers rely on access revenues as an important source of revenues. Unless these revenues can be recovered through a new government funding mechanism, or be reflected in higher rates to the local end user, or other methods of cost recovery can be created, the loss of revenues could be significant. TDS Telecom will continue to advocate continuation of access charges or sufficient substitutes for the lost revenues before the FCC and also with appropriate state regulatory authorities. However, there can be no assurance that access charges will be continued or that sufficient substitutes for the lost revenues will be provided. If access charges are reduced without sufficient substitutes for the lost revenues, this could have a material adverse effect on TDS Telecom’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

37

On May 23, 2001, the FCC modified its existing universal service support mechanism for rural local telephone companies by adopting an interim embedded cost mechanism for a five-year period. The FCC specifically “re-based” the capped high-cost loop support fund for rural telephone companies, but retained an indexed cap on the fund. The FCC also created a “rural growth factor” that allows the high-cost loop support fund to grow based on annual changes in inflation and the total number of rural working loops, and created new state certification requirements for receiving universal service support.

During 2004, the FCC continued reviewing the universal service fund and applicable rules to assess the sustainability of the fund and is examining the process for determining the appropriate contributors, contribution rate, collection method, supported services, and the eligibility and portability of payments. Despite interim adjustments to make the funding more sustainable, the FCC has indicated that additional changes are necessary to stabilize the fund. Total federal funding has doubled since 1998, and some FCC members and members of Congress have expressed concerns that it will soon reach politically unacceptable levels. The FCC is also considering whether companies that provide broadband access to the Internet should be required to contribute to universal service funding (currently such broadband services are exempt) and the methodology of determining the assessment of a universal service fee. The FCC also requested the Federal-State Joint Board, a body made up of FCC Commissioners and state regulatory officials, to evaluate the high-cost universal service support mechanisms for rural carriers, and to assess the definition of a rural company, consolidation of study areas within a state, restricting support to a primary line, and the adoption of a forward looking cost mechanism. Changes in the universal service fund that reduce the size of the fund and payments to TDS Telecom could have a material adverse impact on the company’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

All forms of federal support available to incumbent local exchange carriers are now “portable” to any local competitor that qualifies for support as an eligible telecommunications carrier. A number of wireless carriers have been classified as eligible telecommunications carriers. Portable per-line support is currently based on the incumbent’s per line support and that could make it more attractive for wireless carriers and other companies to enter rural or suburban markets as a competitor in high-cost TDS Telecom incumbent local exchange service areas. The FCC is currently considering whether a national standard should be developed for eligible telecommunications carrier qualification, and if second lines should be supported by the universal service fund. A more stringent standard for meeting the eligible telecommunications carrier designation, possibly closer to local exchange carrier of last resort responsibilities, as well as specific public interest standards for determining the authorization of multiple eligible telecommunications carriers in rural areas could slow the growth of the fund and make it more sustainable for incumbent local exchange carriers. However, action on this item is uncertain.

The Telecommunications Act of 1996 requires all telecommunications carriers to interconnect with other carriers. Incumbent local exchange carriers and competitive local exchange carriers are required to permit resale, to provide number portability, dialing parity, access to rights-of-way and to pay reciprocal compensation. Unless exempted or granted a suspension or modification from these requirements, incumbent local exchange carriers must also negotiate interconnection terms in good faith, not discriminate, unbundle elements of their network and service components, offer their retail services at wholesale rates to their competitors, and allow other carriers to place equipment necessary for interconnection or access on their premises. The FCC also requires incumbent local exchange carriers’ rates for interconnection and network components to be based on “total element long-run incremental costs.” The rules adopted by the FCC to implement the Telecommunications Act governing interconnection obligations, unbundling requirements, resale requirements, and rates have been challenged by various parties in numerous courts and have been largely upheld on appeal, including two cases before the United States Supreme Court. In 2003, the FCC adopted additional rules governing the obligations of incumbent local exchange carriers to unbundle network elements and make them available on a platform basis to competitors. Significant portions of this decision were vacated by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in March 2004, and the FCC issued interim unbundling rules to comply with the Court’s decision. On December 15, 2004, the FCC adopted an Order promulgating new unbundling rules to replace earlier rules vacated by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. These new rules relaxed some, but not all, of the unbundling requirements previously imposed upon incumbent local exchange carriers, thus making it more challenging generally for competing carriers to offer service without constructing their own facilities.

38

Because all TDS Telecom incumbent local exchange carriers are classified as “rural telephone companies”, the Telecommunications Act generally exempts them (except for Mid-Plains, which lost its rural exemption) from the obligations outlined above until they receive a bona fide request for interconnection and the relevant state commission has determined that the rural exemption should be lifted. To date, the interconnection requests received by TDS Telecom incumbent local exchange carriers have recognized their status as “rural telephone companies”, and have been limited in scope. In the state of Tennessee, TDS Telecom has negotiated interconnection agreements with five competitive local exchange carriers in four markets for the purpose of network interconnection, transport and termination of local calling area traffic, and local number portability. In the state of Georgia, TDS Telecom has received and negotiated an interconnection request from a competitive local exchange carrier in two markets for the purpose of transport and termination of local calling area traffic, and local number portability. TDS Telecom has received two interconnection requests in the state of Florida, which are still being reviewed with the requesting carriers to ensure their requests are consistent with the facilities they need to provide service. TDS Telecom has also received interconnection requests in several states from a cable company, which represents a significant change in the competitive landscape that may pose a serious competitive challenge to TDS Telecom’s operations.

The FCC and various provisions of federal law require carriers to comply with numerous regulatory requirements; compliance with these requirements may be costly and noncompliance may lead to financial penalties. These requirements include providing means for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) and other federal and state law enforcement officers to monitor and intercept telephone lines and otherwise assist in investigations, letting subscribers change to competitors’ services without changing their telephone numbers, taking actions to preserve the available pool of telephone numbers, making telecommunications accessible for those with disabilities, monitoring and reporting network outages, and other requirements.

The FCC has mandated that all local exchange carriers throughout the country be capable of facilitating wireless number portability. The wireless number portability requirement is triggered by the local exchange carrier’s receipt of a request from a wireless carrier providing service in the local exchange carrier’s service area asking that the local exchange carrier implement number portability in a particular switch. Depending on the technical changes that are required in the switch, the local exchange carrier may take up to six months from the date of the request to implement the capability for portability. Local exchange carriers may also seek waivers or extensions of these deadlines pursuant to the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and the FCC’s rules. As of December 2004, 96% of TDS Telecom’s incumbent local exchange lines for which a legitimate request was received were capable of supporting local number portability, and TDS Telecom has received extensions ranging from three months up to two years for the implementation of local number portability for a number of locations. The cost of complying with these mandates is significant. Also, the FCC is considering a reduction in the amount of time allowed for porting a wireline number to a wireless service, which is a proposal that TDS has opposed. If adopted, TDS would have even higher costs of complying with the FCC’s wireless portability requirement. TDS Telecom is seeking policies that provide a fair opportunity to recover the costs of meeting all of these requirements. However, there can be no assurance that TDS Telecom will be successful in such efforts and compliance with these various obligations could impose significant costs on the company.

The FCC continues to consider policies to encourage nationwide advanced broadband infrastructure development. TDS Telecom has invested significantly to deliver broadband services to its customers and supports policies that further the goal of bringing broadband services to all rural customers. However, TDS Telecom does not support proposals that advocate the complete deregulation of broadband services and that may adversely affect economic support for high cost areas. Any mandate for nationwide broadband deployment at this time would require extensive additional investment, and though such a mandate is unlikely, the outcome is not certain. State commissions have also been seeking to mandate the deployment of advanced services and enhancements to the infrastructure (e.g., higher modem speeds, digital subscriber line), and those mandates will result in additional costs to condition the loops to provide the service. The FCC is further considering changing the regulatory classification of digital subscriber line from Title II (common carrier regulation) to Title I (which governs information services and is mostly deregulated). It is possible that this could negatively affect incumbent local exchange carriers’ ability to tariff and pool digital subscriber line costs.

The federal telecommunications law preserves interstate toll rate averaging and imposes a nationwide policy that interstate and intrastate long distance rates of all long distance carriers should not be higher in rural areas than in urban areas they serve. In 1999, AT&T and several regional Bell operating companies began limiting and/or discontinuing their long distance services in TDS Telecom service areas. In response, TDS Telecom began to provide its own long distance service to its customers and intends to continue to do so in the future.

39

TDS Telecom continues to participate in state and federal regulatory and legislative processes to urge that any telecommunications reform measures treat rural areas fairly and continue to provide sufficient contributions to high-cost rural service areas to keep TDS Telecom incumbent local exchange carriers’ rates affordable and allow for the continued development of rural infrastructure. The ongoing changes in public policy due to numerous court proceedings and the introduction of competition may adversely affect the earnings of the operating subsidiaries, and TDS Telecom is not able to predict the impact of these changes.

Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier and Related Acquisitions and Divestitures

TDS and TDS Telecom may continue to make opportunistic acquisitions of operating telephone companies and related communications providers. Since January 1, 2000, TDS has acquired eight telephone companies and an additional minority interest in one telephone company serving a total of 82,200 net equivalent access lines for an aggregate consideration totaling $374.5 million, all of which were transferred to TDS Telecom. The consideration paid by TDS consisted entirely of cash and notes, and involved no TDS Common Shares.

Telephone holding companies and others actively compete for the acquisition of telephone companies and such acquisitions are subject to the consent or approval of regulatory agencies in most states and, in some cases, to federal waivers that may affect the form of regulation or amount of interstate cost recovery of acquired telephone exchanges. The TDS acquisition strategy is to focus on geographic clustering of telephone companies to achieve cost economies and to complement TDS Telecom’s product growth strategy. While management believes that it will be successful in making additional targeted acquisitions, there can be no assurance that TDS or TDS Telecom will be able to negotiate additional acquisitions on terms acceptable to them or that regulatory approvals, where required, will be received.

It has been TDS Telecom’s practice to preserve, insofar as possible, the local service and sales activities of each telephone company it acquires. TDS Telecom provides the telephone subsidiaries with centralized purchasing and general management and other services. These services afford the subsidiaries expertise in finance, accounting and treasury services; marketing; customer service; traffic; network management; engineering and construction; customer billing; rate administration; credit and collection; and the development of administrative and procedural practices.

Historically, telephone company acquisition and investment decisions have assumed the ability to recover the cost and a reasonable rate of return through local service, access, and support revenues. As universal service and access are reformed, these revenue streams are becoming less certain. In addition, local telephone companies are subject to competition from new technologies like Voice Over Internet Protocol and increased wireless usage. Potential declining access rates and revisions to universal service support, and competition from new technologies may lead to higher local rates and /or declining earnings and could affect TDS Telecom’s acquisition and investment strategy.

On November 30, 2004, TDS completed the sale of certain wireless properties to ALLTEL. TDS Telecom sold a majority interest in one wireless market which has been operated by ALLTEL and an investment interest in one wireless market for a total of $62.7 million in cash, subject to a working capital adjustment.

Competitive Local Exchange Carrier Segment

Leverage Strengths Into Competitive Local Exchange Carrier Markets

The second component of TDS Telecom’s business strategy includes leveraging its existing strengths as a competitive local exchange carrier. This strategy encompasses many components including the customers within the market, market strategy, competitors, and infrastructure deployment and development. Additionally, planning for ongoing competitive local exchange carrier operations must consider the regulatory environment in which they operate.

40

TDS Telecom’s competitive local exchange carrier strategy maintains a geographic focus and is designed to leverage TDS Telecom’s existing management and infrastructure to complement TDS Telecom’s incumbent local exchange carrier clustering strategy. TDS Telecom has followed a strategy of controlled entry into certain targeted mid-size communities, regionally proximate to existing TDS Telecom facilities and service areas, with facilities based entry as a competitive local exchange carrier. Because it can utilize the infrastructure (e.g. billing systems, network control center, operating systems, financial systems and control accounting, technology planners, etc.) built for the TDS Telecom incumbent local exchange carrier business, management believes that the TDS Telecom competitive local exchange carrier can be profitable in markets that may not support stand alone start-ups. TDS Telecom’s strategy is to be the leading alternative provider for customers’ telecommunications needs in its competitive local exchange carrier markets. To this end, TDS Telecom has deployed switching and other network facilities in its targeted competitive local exchange carrier markets. TDS Telecom follows a “clustering” approach to building its competitive local exchange carriers which allows it to seek regional long distance traffic, share service and repair resources and realize marketing efficiencies. As in its incumbent local exchange carrier markets, TDS Telecom positions itself as an integrated wireline communications provider in its chosen competitive local exchange carrier markets by providing local, long distance, Internet and other services through its own facilities-based networks. TDS Telecom provides competitive local exchange carrier telecommunications services through its TDS Metrocom subsidiary.

TDS Telecom began offering competitive local exchange carrier services in the fourth quarter of 1997. These services are offered in the Madison, greater Fox Valley, Milwaukee, Racine, Kenosha, Janesville and Beloit, Wisconsin markets; in the Rockford and Lake County, northern suburbs of Chicago, Illinois markets; in the greater Grand Rapids, Kalamazoo, Battle Creek, Holland, Grand Haven, Lansing, Jackson, Ann Arbor and the western suburbs of Detroit, Michigan markets; in the Minneapolis/St. Paul, Rochester, Duluth, St. Cloud and Brainerd, Minnesota markets; and in Fargo, North Dakota. As of December 31, 2004, TDS Telecom had 426,800 competitive local exchange carrier equivalent access lines, of which 88% were on-switch (i.e. traffic is handled by the competitive local exchange carrier switch).

In 2004, TDS Telecom continued the integration of its two competitive local exchange carriers. The integration of the two independent competitive local exchange carrier operations will provide internal efficiencies and strengthen overall market position. The operations function as primarily facilities-based competitive local exchange carriers operating eight switching facilities, 110 collocations and multiple fiber networks across the five-state service area.

In an effort to increase revenue without high capital investment the competitive local exchange carrier operation launched a competitive access provider services line in 2004 that employs industry-proven network planning and engineering standards and enables the company to offer services in high demand to customers using a revenue-driven-model. Revenue commitments in advance from competitive access provider customers allow TDS Telecom to leverage existing assets and to further expand capacity. At the same time, this strategy facilitates new primary market demand for products and services by providing these same services to large corporate enterprise customers. This new primary market demand generates additional sales and revenue with modest incremental capital risk.

In 2004, the competitive local exchange carrier operation also began efforts to test the deployment of last mile replacement technologies. A fixed wireless network was deployed in a portion of the greater Fox Valley market and market tests are ongoing and successful, based on the number of customers currently signed up for the new service. This method of delivery allows for faster speeds than digital subscriber line services (the copper line high-speed data solution that competes directly with cable-based broadband services) to customers that are at distances greater than 10,000 feet from the central office and thus removes the footprint limitations inherent in telephony-based high-speed Internet services. Wireless delivery also allows for control over the installation intervals (the time beginning when a customer orders service to when service is delivered) and the customer service experience that end users have once the service is implemented. Wireless delivery also facilitates provisioning high-speed Internet and /or voice services to customers using facilities that are 100%-owned and operated by the competitive local exchange carrier, thus eliminating the need for incumbent local exchange carrier local loops and eliminating the risk of regulatory changes affecting the cost of delivering service.

An additional deployment of fixed wireless infrastructure is underway in Madison, Wisconsin, that will expand the use of fixed wireless to include Voice Over Internet Protocol services utilizing softswitch technology. Softswitch technology, a non-circuit switch solution that utilizes software-based feature generation, allows for greater service flexibility and more cost-effective switch upgrades. Softswitches will allow TDS Telecom’s competitive local exchange operation to respond more quickly to changing customer demand, shorten new product launch timeframes and facilitate faster capacity upgrades at lower initial costs. Softswitch market tests will bundle high-speed Internet services with voice services over a network that decreases dependence on Regional Bell Operating Company local facilities.

41

Also underway is a market test of fiber to the premises provisioned on a passive optical network. A deployment of this technology will allow for Internet connectivity speeds in excess of those provided by cable broadband providers, accommodate the provisioning of voice services and include access to cable-like video programming. Fiber to the premises enables services commonly referred to as “triple play”, which is capable of providing voice, data and video; and will give customers the ability to put all of their communications and entertainment services on one bill, and will provide for a land-based alternative to the wired cable companies in these markets.

All of the currently deployed strategies recognize the changing telecommunications marketplace and the need to increase revenue while decreasing dependence on Regional Bell Operating Companies for infrastructure elements. Longer-term competitive local exchange carrier strategies include the eventual conversion of unbundled network element platform and resale customers to on-switch facilities and deeper market share penetration into existing on-switch markets. Further efforts to test and deploy alternative last mile technologies are expected in the near future as well as efforts designed to maximize revenue opportunities with existing high-speed Internet customers. One such effort scheduled for launch in the first quarter of 2005 is a bundled Internet content product set. These content bundles, offered initially to existing high-speed Internet customers, provide for special access to media and interactive content providers. Providing for the availability of a better Internet experience may not only generate new revenue, through the subscription to these bundles, but will serve as another incentive to non-broadband users to upgrade to the faster broadband Internet services in the competitive local exchange operation portfolio of products.

TDS Telecom’s combined competitive local exchange carrier strategy is currently focused on its markets in Wisconsin, Minnesota, Illinois, Michigan and North Dakota.

In response to petitions filed by the Regional Bell Operating Company for increases in rates for certain wholesale services that it provides to competitive local exchange carriers, the state public service commissions of Illinois, Wisconsin and Michigan have issued orders that will adversely affect the cost of providing some services for TDS Telecom’s competitive local exchange carrier operations in those states, primarily services to residential customers and certain small business customers. The pricing data for the major markets of the competitive local exchange carriers became available in the fourth quarter of 2004. These pricing changes, as well as other regulatory changes as described in the “Competitive Local Exchange Carrier Markets Regulation” section below, and competitive pressures triggered an impairment review by TDS Telecom of its competitive local exchange carrier operations’ tangible assets and intangible assets. As a result of the impairment review, TDS Telecom concluded that the long-lived tangible assets of its competitive local exchange carrier operations were impaired and recorded a loss on impairment of tangible assets of $87.9 million in the Statement of Operations in the fourth quarter of 2004. TDS Telecom also concluded that goodwill associated with the competitive local exchange carrier operations was impaired and recorded a loss on impairment of intangible assets of $29.4 million in the Statement of Operations in the fourth quarter of 2004.

Competitive Local Exchange Carrier Market Strategy

The competitive local exchange carrier strategy places primary emphasis on small and medium sized commercial customers and residential customers. Medium sized commercial prospects are characterized by above average access line to employee ratios, heavier utilization of data services and a focus on using telecommunications for business improvement. Commercial accounts typically seek increased telephony capabilities at reduced costs. To combat growing Regional Bell Operating Company customer “Winback” programs that use a low price strategy, TDS Telecom pursues an application sales strategy for its primary target markets. This commercial consultative sales approach builds on customer preference for integrated communication services and the customer’s perception that some of the value of the product is in personalized service. Application sales techniques create user value by a process of discovery of customer needs focused on utilizing new and existing technologies to improve business performance and create greater efficiencies in the use of telecommunications products. Ongoing after-the-sale support consultants ensure that customers always have up-to-date information about new technologies and opportunities to frequently evaluate the configuration of their telecommunications services so that they are able to increase the effect these services have on their profitability. The application sales approach also aids in maximizing the impact of integrated voice and data technologies as businesses increase their use of data as part of their business models.

An emphasis on product development has led to the introduction of integrated voice and data solutions as well as the creation of small business bundled products. Similar to the strategies employed in the competitive local exchange carrier’s consumer arena, bundles targeting one- to five-line business customers make buying telecommunications and data services easier and increases the perceived value of these products. Offering dynamic and cost-effective data solutions bundled with and provisioned on a single access line provides for direct cost savings to the customer, removes any distance limitation commonly associated with digital subscriber line technology and gives the customer greater flexibility to grow business telecommunications use.

42

TDS Telecom’s competitive local exchange carrier operation focuses on gaining additional market share within established competitive local exchange carrier markets. TDS Telecom’s competitive local exchange carriers concentrate on increasing sales distribution channels, targeting new customer segments, and rolling out new product sets to existing customers and to targeted market segments. A strategic accounts sales team was established in 2004 to appeal to large commercial accounts. The strategic account managers leverage governmental, institutional and larger commercial accounts, many of them having multi-location business sites across the TDS Telecom competitive local exchange carrier market footprints. Joint sales and marketing teams develop alternative sales channel agent programs and affinity group plans designed to leverage and partner with well known local companies.

The consumer sales strategy focuses on bundling to create demand by the mass market. TDS Telecom seeks to take the features that customers value and combine them with calling plans attractive to a majority of high-value customers. To make its products even more attractive to the high-value consumer segment, TDS Telecom emphasizes its high-speed data solutions tied to traditional service bundles. Sales of high-speed data product bundles will be emphasized to counter cellular and cable industry “cut the cord” customer acquisition strategies. TDS Telecom offers digital subscriber line service to provide the customer with suitable bundles that compete directly with Regional Bell Operating Companies and cable providers. For the consumer market, TDS Telecom has built its customer acquisition strategy around direct response programs that allow it to deliver a tightly targeted message to specific high-value customers. TDS Telecom employs a variety of channels to sell, including Web marketing, door-to-door sales, agent partnerships, and telemarketing.

While the competitive local exchange carrier operation is positioning itself as a high-quality telecommunications provider, it is experiencing price competition from the Regional Bell Operating Companies and other competitive local exchange carriers as it attempts to gain or retain customers. In addition, the Regional Bell Operating Companies are actively seeking regulatory and technological barriers that could impede TDS Telecom’s access to facilities used to provide telecommunications services. The competitive local exchange carrier operation continues to seek and maintain an efficient cost structure to ensure that it can match price-based initiatives from competitors. Wireless data, Internet protocol telephony, and packet switching networks are all being studied or deployed to increase high-speed data reach, to lower the cost of providing service, and to ensure continuing access to network facilities for service provision. To effectively compete in our chosen markets, TDS Telecom is continuing new product development to provide high-quality, leading edge services to its customers that can be leveraged by both its independent local exchange carrier and competitive local exchange carrier operations. As discussed below, the TDS Telecom competitive local exchange carrier operation is also actively opposing regulatory changes adopted or proposed by the FCC that could reduce its revenues, limit its expansion plans, or decrease its access to Regional Bell Operating Company-owned facilities that it uses to provide service.

Competitive Local Exchange Carrier Technology

During 2004, TDS Telecom continued fiber construction to further expand its customer base. TDS Telecom’s competitive local exchange carrier operation continued to add capacity to its switches to accommodate expansion, increased capacity on fiber around Minneapolis/St. Paul and improved redundancy in its overall network.

TDS Telecom’s expected capital spending in 2005 is $30 million to $35 million for competitive local exchange carrier markets, compared to actual capital expenditures of $35.2 million in 2004 and $27.3 million in 2003. Financing for capital additions will be provided by TDS Telecom internally generated funds and short-term borrowing.

Competitive Local Exchange Carrier Market Competition

TDS Telecom’s competitive local exchange carrier operation faces a range of competition including the incumbent Regional Bell Operating Company (SBC or Qwest), one or more competitive local exchange carriers, cable and wireless carriers, Voice Over Internet Protocol providers, and others.

43

TDS Telecom’s competitive local exchange carrier operation competes with the Regional Bell Operating Companies on the basis of price, reliability, state-of-the-art technology, product offerings, route diversity, ease of ordering and customer service. SBC and Qwest have long-standing relationships with their customers and are well established in their respective markets. Although the Regional Bell Operating Companies generally are subject to greater pricing and regulatory constraints than competitive local exchange carriers, Regional Bell Operating Companies are achieving increased pricing flexibility for their services and have implemented long-term contracts with high cancellation penalties for retention purposes. The Regional Bell Operating Companies continue to pursue aggressive “Winback” programs that have been somewhat effective in regaining lines lost to competitive local exchange carriers. Competition for private line, special access and local exchange services is based primarily on quality, capacity and reliability of network facilities; customer service; response to customer needs; service features; and price. It is not based on any proprietary technology. As a result of the technology used in its networks, TDS Telecom may have cost and service quality advantages over some currently available Regional Bell Operating Company networks. In addition, TDS Telecom believes that, in general, its competitive local exchange carrier operations provide more attention and responsiveness to their customers than do the Regional Bell Operating Company competitors to similar customers.

TDS Telecom also faces competition from other competitive local exchange carriers in many of the cities where it has competitive local exchange carrier operations. Although some competitive local exchange carriers have failed or are in a reorganization mode, competition is also coming from entities in related industries. These entities include long distance carriers, Internet service providers, cable television companies, Regional Bell Operating Company resellers, Voice Over Internet Protocol providers, utilities, municipalities, cellular/wireless carriers, and private networks built by large end users. TDS Telecom’s competitive local exchange carrier market positioning against these carriers is based on regional focus, application oriented results driven sales teams, personal customer care, simple and compelling offers, and consistent execution of processes—especially the back office provisioning processes required to offer competitive local service.

Competitive Local Exchange Carrier Markets Regulation

A number of federal and state regulatory proposals, policies and proceedings are important to TDS Telecom’s competitive local exchange carrier operations. Most significantly, the FCC released an important decision on August 21, 2003 that affected all aspects of access to the facilities of incumbent local exchange carriers via unbundled network elements (also known as the Triennial Review Order). However, this order was challenged on appeal and, in a decision issued March 2, 2004 and effective June 16, 2004, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit invalidated significant portions of the Triennial Review Order. Principally, the court held that the FCC had improperly sought to delegate to state public utility commissions the selection of unbundled network elements subject to competitive access. The court also vacated the FCC’s interpretation of the standard by which competitive access to incumbent network elements must be given. However, the Court upheld certain aspects of the FCC’s order that could limit the ability of competitive carriers to access fiber optics lines and lines that are a combination of copper and fiber optics. The FCC issued an Interim Order requiring continued access for all carriers using unbundled network elements, pending adoption of new unbundling rules. TDS Metrocom’s appeal of the rules related to access to fiber and mixed copper/fiber facilities was denied by the Supreme Court and those rules are now final. On December 15, 2004, the FCC adopted an Order revising the unbundling rules, preserving access to the most common high-capacity loops and transport used by TDS Telecom, and limiting access of competitive local exchange carriers to certain unbundled network elements, particularly those used to provide non-facilities based competitive local exchange services. The text of the final order was released on February 4, 2005, with an effective date of March 11, 2005. To the extent that TDS Telecom competitive local exchange carrier operations rely on an unbundled network element platform provided by incumbent carriers, this decision, if not overturned on appeal, will lead to a phase-out of that method of competitive entry. Moreover, the loss of some access and transport options as a result of the FCC’s Order is unfavorable for TDS Telecom competitive local exchange carrier operations and could negatively affect the company’s ability to provide broadband services to end users.

In May 2004, the FCC issued an order relating to traffic that originates on a wireless carrier’s network and is handled by a local exchange carrier and then is switched and delivered to an interexchange carrier. The FCC capped the rate that competitive local exchange carriers are able to charge for this traffic resulting in a reduction in rates for that traffic.

State proceedings to review the pricing of unbundled network elements were concluded in Illinois, Michigan and Wisconsin in 2004. In each case, rates for unbundled loops for residential and small business were increased, while in some cases rates for unbundled loops to serve medium to large business were reduced.

44

In 2005, issues related to intercarrier compensation are likely to become more prominent. Pending issues include whether to replace the current intercarrier compensation system with a bill and keep, capacity based or hybrid compensation system. TDS Telecom will advocate for a system that adequately compensates carriers for the use of their facilities and recognizes that different carrier cost structures may call for individualized rate structures.

The FCC exercises jurisdiction over all interstate communications services. The FCC exercises regulatory jurisdiction over all facilities of, and services offered by, communications common carriers to the extent those facilities are used to provide, originate or terminate interstate communications. The FCC has established different levels of regulation for “dominant” carriers and “non-dominant” carriers. For domestic interstate communications services, only the incumbent local exchange carriers are classified as dominant carriers. All other carriers are classified as non-dominant. The FCC regulates many of the rates, charges and services of dominant carriers to a greater degree than those of non-dominant carriers. As non-dominant carriers, competitive local exchange carriers may install and operate facilities for domestic interstate communications without prior FCC authorization. Competitive local exchange carriers are not required to maintain tariffs for domestic interstate long distance services. However, competitive local exchange carriers are required to submit certain periodic reports to the FCC and to pay regulatory fees.

Competitive local exchange carriers are also subject to regulation by state public service commissions. Certain state public service commissions require competitive local exchange carriers to obtain operating authority prior to initiating intrastate services. Certain states also require the filing of tariffs or price lists and/or customer specific contracts. TDS Telecom competitive local exchange carriers are not currently subject to rate-of-return or price regulation. However, competitive local exchange carriers are subject to state specific quality of service, universal service, periodic reporting and other regulatory requirements, although the extent of these requirements is generally less than those applicable to incumbent local exchange carriers. In addition, local governments may require competitive local exchange carriers to obtain licenses or franchises regulating the use of public rights-of-way necessary to install and operate their networks.

Data and Advanced Services

An important component of TDS Telecom’s business strategy is to develop high-growth services, particularly in the data arena. Data communications is one of the fastest growing portions of the telecommunications services industry. In light of the growth of Internet use and rapid introduction of new telecommunications technology, TDS Telecom intends to offer a suite of data products in all of its markets, thereby positioning itself as a full-service data networking service provider. TDS Telecom currently provides Internet access to its incumbent local exchange carrier and competitive local exchange carrier customers. At December 31, 2004, TDS Telecom’s incumbent local exchange carrier provided Internet service to approximately 101,300 customers, while the competitive local exchange carriers provided Internet services to approximately 18,200 customers.

TDS Telecom continued to grow its services in the data communications market at both its incumbent local exchange carrier and competitive local exchange carrier units, including deployment of digital subscriber line technology. TDS Telecom believes that penetration of broadband access will eventually exceed that of dial-up Internet services and that digital subscriber line technology will continue to be a key technology for the provision of broadband Internet access. TDS Telecom will continue to deploy digital subscriber line services as an important element of high-speed Internet access and as a complementary product to web hosting, messaging, and collocation services. During 2004 TDS Telecom introduced new DSL products and offered a range of speed options to meet the varied needs of its customers.

For the future, a number of services utilizing a broadband connection are in various stages of research and development such as hosted applications, Voice Over Internet Protocol, Internet call waiting and video services. TDS Telecom currently has two fiber to the premises trials underway in its independent local exchange carrier operation. The first is a complete fiber build-out of a large subdivision and the second is a combination fiber to the premises overbuild and asymmetric digital subscriber line deployment. Continued investment in these and other areas will be dependent on market demand and foreseeable growth prospects.

45

Investments

TDS and its subsidiaries hold a substantial amount of marketable equity securities that are publicly traded and can have volatile share prices. TDS and its subsidiaries do not make direct investments in publicly traded companies and all of these interests were acquired as a result of sales, trades or reorganizations of other assets. The investment in Deutsche Telekom AG (“Deutsche Telekom”) resulted from TDS’s disposition of its over 80%-owned personal communications services operating subsidiary, Aerial Communications, Inc., to VoiceStream Wireless Corporation (“VoiceStream”) in exchange for stock of VoiceStream, which was then acquired by Deutsche Telekom in exchange for Deutsche Telekom stock. The investment in Vodafone Group Plc (“Vodafone”) resulted from certain dispositions of non-strategic cellular investments to or settlements with AirTouch Communications, Inc. (“AirTouch”) in exchange for stock of AirTouch, which was then acquired by Vodafone whereby TDS and its subsidiaries received American Depositary Receipts representing Vodafone stock. The investment in VeriSign, Inc. (“VeriSign”) is the result of the acquisition by VeriSign of Illuminet, Inc., a telecommunications entity in which several TDS subsidiaries held interests. The investment in Rural Cellular Corporation (“Rural Cellular”) is the result of a consolidation of several cellular partnerships in which TDS subsidiaries held interests in Rural Cellular, and the distribution of Rural Cellular stock in exchange for these interests. A contributing factor in TDS’s decision not to dispose of the investments is that their tax basis is significantly lower than current stock prices, and therefore would trigger a substantial taxable gain upon disposition.

These assets are classified for financial reporting purposes as available-for-sale securities. The market value of these investments aggregated $3,398.8 million at December 31, 2004, and $2,772.4 million at December 31, 2003. As of December 31, 2004, the unrealized holding gain, net of tax included in accumulated other comprehensive income totaled $1,109.2 million. This amount was $732.9 million at December 31, 2003. In 2002, TDS recognized, in the Statement of Operations, pre-tax losses of $1,757.5 million ($1,029.3 million, net of tax and minority interest of $728.2 million), related to investments in marketable equity securities as a result of management’s determination that unrealized losses with respect to the investments were other than temporary.

Subsidiaries of TDS and U.S. Cellular have entered into a number of forward contracts with counterparties related to the marketable equity securities that they hold. TDS and U.S. Cellular have provided guarantees to the counterparties which provide assurance that all principal and interest amounts are paid upon settlement of the contracts by such subsidiaries. The risk management objective of the forward contracts is to hedge the value of the marketable equity securities from losses due to decreases in the market prices of the securities (“downside limit”) while retaining a share of gains from increases in the market prices of such securities (“upside potential”). The downside limit is hedged at or above the cost basis thereby eliminating the risk of an other than temporary loss being recorded on these contracted securities.

Under the terms of the forward contracts, subsidiaries of TDS and U.S. Cellular will continue to own the contracted shares and will receive dividends paid on such contracted shares, if any. The forward contracts mature from May 2007 to September 2008 and, at TDS’s and U.S. Cellular’s option, may be settled in shares of the respective security or in cash, pursuant to formulas that “collar” the price of the shares. The collars effectively limit downside risk and upside potential on the contracted shares. The collars are typically adjusted for any changes in dividends on the contracted shares. If the dividend increases, the collar’s upside potential is typically reduced. If the dividend decreases, the collar’s upside potential is typically increased. If TDS and U.S. Cellular elect to settle in shares, they will be required to deliver the number of shares of the contracted security determined pursuant to the formula. If shares are delivered in the settlement of the forward contract, TDS and U.S. Cellular would incur a current tax liability at the time of delivery based on the difference between the tax basis of the marketable equity securities delivered and the net amount realized through maturity. If TDS and U.S. Cellular elect to settle in cash they will be required to pay an amount in cash equal to the fair market value of the number of shares determined pursuant to the formula.

Deferred taxes have been provided for the difference between the financial reporting basis and the income tax basis of the marketable equity securities and are included in deferred tax liabilities on the balance sheet. Such deferred tax liabilities totaled $1,284.9 million at December 31, 2004, and $1,054.8 million at December 31, 2003.

46

The following table summarizes certain facts surrounding the contracted securities as of December 31, 2004.

		Collar (1)
Security	Shares	Downside Limit (Floor)	Upside Potential (Ceiling)	Loan Amount (000s)
VeriSign	2,361,333	$8.82	$11.46	$	20,819
Vodafone Group Plc (2)	12,945,915	$15.07-$16.07	$20.01-$22.60	201,038
Deutsche Telekom	131,461,861	$10.74-$12.41	$14.21-$17.17	1,532,257
				1,754,114
Unamortized debt discount (3)				64,470
				$	1,689,644

(1)The per share amounts represent the range of floor and ceiling prices of all the securities monetized.

(2)U.S. Cellular owns 10.2 million and TDS Telecom owns 2.7 million Vodafone Group Plc American Depositary Receipts.

(3)Certain forward contracts are structured as zero coupon obligations. The debt discount is being amortized over the lives of the contracts.

Employees

TDS enjoys satisfactory employee relations. As of January 31, 2005, approximately 11,500 full-time and part-time persons were employed by TDS, 160 of whom are represented by unions.

47

PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT
OF 1995 SAFE HARBOR CAUTIONARY STATEMENT

This Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, including exhibits, contains statements that are not based on historical fact, including the words “believes”, “anticipates,” “intends,” “expects” and similar words. These statements constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, events or developments to be significantly different from any future results, events or developments expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include the following:

•Increases in the level of competition in the markets in which TDS operates, or wireless for wireline substitution, could adversely affect TDS’s revenues or increase its costs to compete.

•Consolidation in the wireless industry may create stronger competitors both operationally and financially which could adversely affect TDS’s revenues and increase its costs to compete.

•Advances or changes in telecommunications technology, such as Voice Over Internet Protocol, could render certain technologies used by TDS obsolete, could reduce TDS’s revenues or could increase TDS’s cost of doing business.

•Changes in the telecommunications regulatory environment, or a failure to timely or fully comply with any regulatory requirements, such as wireless number portability, local number portability and E-911 services, could adversely affect TDS’s financial condition, results of operations or ability to do business.

•Changes in the telecommunications regulatory environment, including the effects of potential changes in the rules governing universal service funding and potential changes in the amounts or methods of intercarrier compensation, could have a material adverse effect on TDS’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

•Changes in U.S. Cellular’s enterprise value, changes in the supply or demand of the market for wireless licenses or telephone companies, adverse developments in the TDS businesses or the industries in which TDS is involved and/or other factors could require TDS to recognize impairments in the carrying value of TDS’s license costs, goodwill and/or physical assets.

•Early redemptions of debt or repurchases of debt, changes in prepaid forward contracts, operating leases, purchase obligations or other factors or developments could cause the amounts reported under Contractual Obligations in TDS’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis incorporated by reference herein, to be different from the amounts actually incurred.

•Changes in accounting standards or TDS’s accounting policies, estimates and/or in the assumptions underlying the accounting estimates, including those described under Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates in TDS’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis incorporated by reference herein, could have an adverse effect on TDS’s financial condition and results of operations.

•Settlements, judgments, restraints on its current or future manner of doing business and/or legal costs resulting from pending and future litigation could have an adverse effect on TDS’s financial condition, results of operations or ability to do business.

•Costs, integration problems or other factors associated with acquisitions/divestitures of properties and/or licenses could have an adverse effect on TDS’s financial condition or results of operations.

•Changes in prices, the number of customers, average revenue per unit, penetration rates, churn rates, selling expenses, net customer retention costs associated with wireless number portability and local number portability, roaming rates, access minutes of use, the mix of products and services offered or other business factors could have an adverse effect on TDS’s business operations.

48

•Changes in roaming partners’ rates for voice services and the lack of standards and roaming agreements for wireless data products could place U.S. Cellular’s service offerings at a disadvantage to those offered by other wireless carriers with more nationwide service territories and could have an adverse effect on TDS’s operations.

•Changes in competitive factors with national and global wireless carriers could result in product and cost disadvantages and could have an adverse effect on TDS’s operations.

•Changes in guidance or interpretations of accounting requirements, changes in industry practice or changes in management assumptions could require amendments to or restatements of disclosures or financial information included in this or prior filings with the SEC.

•Uncertainty of access to capital for telecommunications companies, deterioration in the capital markets, other changes in market conditions, changes in TDS’s credit ratings or other factors could limit or restrict the availability of financing on terms and prices acceptable to TDS, which could require TDS to reduce its construction, development and acquisition programs.

•Changes in income tax rates, tax laws, regulations or rulings, or federal and state tax assessments could have an adverse effect on TDS’s financial condition and results of operations.

•War, conflicts, hostilities and/or terrorist attacks could have an adverse effect on TDS’s businesses.

•Changes in general economic and business conditions, both nationally and in the markets in which TDS operates, including difficulties by telecommunications companies, could have an adverse effect on TDS’s businesses.

•Changes in facts or circumstances, including new or additional information that affects the calculation of accrued liabilities for contingent obligations under guarantees, indemnities or otherwise, could require TDS to record charges in excess of amounts accrued on the financial statements, if any, which could have an adverse effect on TDS’s financial condition and results of operations.

•A material weakness in the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting could result in inaccurate financial statements or other disclosures or permit fraud, which could have an adverse effect on TDS's business, results of operations and financial condition. Assurance cannot be provided as to when such material weaknesses disclosed herein will be remediated.

•The possible development of adverse precedent in litigation or conclusions in professional studies to the effect that radio frequency emissions from handsets, wireless data devices and/or cell sites cause harmful health consequences, including cancer or tumors, or may interfere with various electronic medical devices such as pacemakers, could have a material adverse effect on TDS’s wireless business operations, TDS’s financial condition and results of operations.

•Any of the foregoing events or other events could cause revenues, customer additions, operating income, capital expenditures and or any other financial or statistical information to vary from TDS’s forward estimates included in this report by a material amount.

TDS undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Readers should evaluate any statements in light of these important factors.

49

Item 2.  Properties

The property of TDS consists principally of switching and cell site equipment related to wireless telephone operations; and telephone lines, central office equipment, telephone instruments and related equipment, and land and buildings related to land-line telephone operations. As of December 31, 2004, TDS's property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, totaled $3,419.4 million; $2,440.7 million at U.S. Cellular, $945.8 million at TDS Telecom and $32.9 million at Corporate and Suttle Straus.

The plant and equipment of TDS is maintained in good operating condition and is suitable and adequate for TDS’s business operations. The properties of the operating telephone subsidiaries are subject to the lien of the mortgages securing the funded debt of such companies. TDS leases most of its offices and transmitter sites used in its wireless business and owns substantially all of its central office buildings, local administrative buildings, warehouses, and storage facilities used in its wireline telephone operations. All of TDS’s cell and transmitter sites and telephone lines are located either on private or public property. Locations on private land are by virtue of easements or other arrangements.

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings

TDS is involved in a number of legal proceedings before the FCC and various state and federal courts. TDS does not believe that any such proceeding or all such proceedings in the aggregate should have a material adverse impact on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of TDS.

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2004.

50

PART II

Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 13, Annual Report sections entitled “TDS Stock and Dividend Information” and “Consolidated Quarterly Information.”

The following table provides certain information with respect to all purchases made by or on behalf of TDS, and any open market purchases made by any “affiliated purchaser” (as defined by the SEC) of TDS, of TDS Common Shares during the fourth quarter of 2004.

TDS PURCHASES OF COMMON SHARES

Period	(a) Total Number of Common Shares Purchased	(b) Average Price Paid per Common Share		(c) Total Number of Common Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	(d) Maximum Number of Common Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
October 1 - 31, 2004	—	$	—	—	824,300
November 1 - 30, 2004	—	—		—	824,300
December 1 - 31, 2004	—	—		—	824,300
Total for or as of end of the quarter ended 12/31/04	—	$	—	—	824,300

The following is additional information with respect to TDS’s publicly announced Common Share repurchase program:

i.The date the program was announced was February 28, 2003 by press release.

ii.The share amount originally approved was 3,000,000 Common Shares (representing a reauthorization of 1,009,746 unpurchased shares under a program that was scheduled to expire in April 2003, plus 1,990,254 shares under a new authorization).

iii.The expiration date of the program is February 28, 2006.

iv.No stock repurchase program has expired during the fourth quarter of 2004.

v.TDS has not determined to terminate the foregoing stock repurchase program prior to expiration, or to cease making further purchases thereunder, during the fourth quarter of 2004.

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data

Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 13, Annual Report section entitled “Selected Consolidated Financial Data,” except for ratios of earnings to fixed charges, which are incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 12 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

51

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 13, Annual Report section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 13, Annual Report section entitled “Market Risk.”

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 13, Annual Report sections entitled “Consolidated Statements of Operations,” “Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows,” “Consolidated Balance Sheets,” “Consolidated Statements of Common Stockholders’ Equity,” “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,” “Consolidated Quarterly Information (Unaudited),” “Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” and “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

TDS maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in its reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is processed, recorded, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to TDS’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.

As required by SEC Rule 13a-15(b), TDS carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of TDS’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report.  Based on this evaluation, management concluded that TDS’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2004, at the reasonable assurance level, because of the material weaknesses described below.  Notwithstanding the material weaknesses that existed as of December 31, 2004, management has concluded that the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position, results of operation and cash flows of TDS and its subsidiaries in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

52

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (Restated).

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. TDS’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the issuer; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the issuer are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the issuer; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the issuer’s assets that could have a material effect on the interim or annual consolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Under the supervision and with the participation of TDS’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, TDS conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 based on the criteria in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected.  Management identified the following material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004:

1.TDS did not have a sufficient complement of personnel with an appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience and training in the application of generally accepted accounting principles commensurate with its financial reporting requirements and the complexity of its operations and transactions.  This control deficiency contributed to the material weaknesses discussed in items 2 and 3 below and the restatement of TDS’s annual consolidated financial statements for 2004, 2003 and 2002, the interim financial statements for all quarters in 2004 and 2003, the first and second quarter financial statements for 2005, as well as adjustments, including audit adjustments, to the third quarter of 2005 and the 2005 annual consolidated financial statements.  Additionally, this control deficiency could result in a misstatement of substantially all accounts and disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to TDS’s interim or annual consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.

2.TDS did not maintain effective controls over its accounting for certain vendor contracts.  Specifically, effective controls were not designed and in place to ensure that certain vendor contracts were raised to the appropriate level of accounting personnel or that accounting personnel reached the appropriate conclusions in order to accurately and timely record the effects of the contracts in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.  This control deficiency primarily affected network operations expense, selling, general and administrative expense, accounts payable, other deferred charges and accrued liabilities.  This control deficiency resulted in the restatement of TDS’s annual consolidated financial statements for 2004, 2003 and 2002, the interim financial statements for all quarters in 2004 and 2003, the first and second quarter financial statements for 2005, as well as adjustments, including audit adjustments, to the third quarter of 2005 and the 2005 annual consolidated financial statements.  Additionally, this control deficiency could result in a misstatement of the aforementioned accounts that would result in a material misstatement to TDS’s interim or annual consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.

53

3.TDS did not maintain effective controls over the completeness, accuracy, presentation and disclosure of its accounting for income taxes, including the determination of income tax expense, income taxes payable, liabilities accrued for tax contingencies and deferred income tax assets and liabilities. Specifically, TDS did not have effective controls designed and in place to accurately calculate income tax expense and income tax payable, monitor the difference between the income tax basis and the financial reporting basis of assets and liabilities and reconcile the resulting basis difference to its deferred income tax asset and liability balances. This control deficiency resulted in the restatement of TDS’s annual consolidated financial statements for 2004, 2003 and 2002, the interim financial statements for all quarters in 2004 and 2003, the first and second quarter financial statements for 2005, as well as adjustments, including audit adjustments, to the third quarter of 2005 and the 2005 annual consolidated financial statements.  Additionally, this control deficiency could result in a misstatement of the aforementioned accounts that would result in a material misstatement to TDS’s interim or annual consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.

In TDS’s original Annual Report on Form 10-K, management concluded that TDS maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004.  However, in connection with the restatement discussed under the heading “Restatement” in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, management has determined that the material weaknesses described above existed as of December 31, 2004.  As a result of these material weaknesses, management has determined that TDS did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the COSO.  Accordingly, management has restated this report on internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of TDS’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is incorporated by reference into Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

Remediation of Material Weaknesses in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Prior to the identification of the material weaknesses described above, TDS had begun the following processes to enhance its internal control over financial reporting:

•Focus on Fundamentals

•This program, initiated in the second quarter 2004, was a self-assessment of TDS’s policies and processes surrounding reporting and financial analysis, internal controls, and implementation of new accounting pronouncements.

•Controller Review Committee

•The Controller Review Committee was formed in the fourth quarter of 2004 and consists of TDS’s Corporate Controller and Assistant Corporate Controller, U.S. Cellular’s Controller and TDS Telecom’s Chief Financial Officer.  The Committee meets regularly to discuss accounting treatment for current, unusual or nonrecurring matters. In addition, the Committee engaged external consultants to provide technical accounting training related to current accounting developments on a quarterly basis

•Enhancements and additions to technical accounting personnel

•TDS – a Vice President and Assistant Corporate Controller was hired in the second quarter of 2005; a Manager, Accounting and Reporting was added in the second quarter of 2005 and a Manager, External Reporting was added in the third quarter of 2005.

•U.S. Cellular – a Vice President and Controller was hired in the second quarter of 2005 and was designated as U.S. Cellular’s principal accounting officer in the third quarter of 2005; a Director, Operations Accounting was hired in the second quarter of 2005 and a Manager, Accounting Policy was added in the first quarter of 2005.

TDS believes the above changes have improved its internal control over financial reporting.

54

Management is currently addressing each of the material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting and is committed to remediating them as expeditiously as possible. Management will devote significant time and resources to the remediation effort. Management’s remediation plans include the following:

•Review of Existing Internal Control Over Financial Reporting – TDS has engaged external consultants to assist in reviewing its existing internal control over financial reporting with the intent of improving the design and operating effectiveness of controls and processes. In addition, management has currently enhanced controls related to restatement items.

•Training – Management has engaged external consultants to assist TDS in developing and implementing a training program specific to the needs of accounting personnel.

•Recruiting – TDS is actively recruiting the necessary personnel to improve its internal control processes and enhance the overall level of expertise.

•Finance Leadership Team – In late 2005, the Finance Leadership Team, consisting of key finance leaders from each of TDS’s business units and Corporate headquarters, formed a Financial Infrastructure Committee. The Committee is planning for longer-term improvements in key business processes and support systems with an emphasis on preventive controls versus detective controls, and system-based controls versus manual controls.

•Income Tax Accounting – TDS has engaged external tax advisors to assist in enhancing controls with respect to monitoring the difference between the income tax basis and financial reporting basis of assets and liabilities and reconciling the difference to the deferred income tax asset and liability balances. The scope of this project encompasses controls over income taxes on a TDS enterprise-wide basis, including U.S. Cellular. In addition, TDS is in the process of implementing a tax provisioning software which TDS believes will enhance its internal controls related to income taxes on a TDS enterprise-wide basis.

•Accounting for Contracts – TDS has enhanced controls related to monitoring, review and communication of contract activity. These controls include additional monitoring procedures, enhanced review processes and increased communication.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Except for the Controller Review Committee discussed above, there were no changes in TDS’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2004, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect TDS’s internal control over financial reporting. Also, as discussed herein, TDS has made or intends to make material changes to internal control over financial reporting in order to remediate the material weaknesses discussed above.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

55

PART III

Item 10.  Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

Incorporated by reference from Proxy Statement sections entitled “Election of Directors,” “Executive Officers” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.”

Item 11.  Executive Compensation

Incorporated by reference from Proxy Statement section entitled “Executive Compensation” except for the information specified in Item 402(a)(8) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Incorporated by reference from Proxy Statement sections entitled “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters” and “Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans.”

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Incorporated by reference from Proxy Statement section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”

Item 14.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Incorporated by reference from Proxy Statement section entitled “Fees Paid to Principal Accountants.”

56

PART IV

Item 15.  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

a)The following documents are filed as a part of this report:

(1)Financial Statements

Consolidated Statements of Operations	Annual Report*
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	Annual Report*
Consolidated Balance Sheets	Annual Report*
Consolidated Statements of Common Stockholders’ Equity	Annual Report*
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	Annual Report*
Consolidated Quarterly Information (Unaudited)	Annual Report*
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting	Annual Report*
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP	Annual Report*

*Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 13.

(2)Financial Statement Schedules

		Location
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Financial Statement Schedule—PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP		page S-1
II.	Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2004	page S-2
Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Financial Statements		page S-4
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Deloitte & Touche LLP		page S-5
Balance Sheets		page S-6
Statements of Operations		page S-7
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital		page S-8
Statements of Cash Flows		page S-9
Notes to Financial Statements		page S-10

All other schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or not required because the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

(3)Exhibits

The exhibits set forth in the accompanying Index to Exhibits are filed as a part of this Report. The following is a list of each management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this form pursuant to Item 15(c) of this Report.

57

Exhibit Number	Description
10.1	Salary Continuation Agreement for LeRoy T. Carlson dated May 20, 1977, as amended May 22, 1981 and May 25, 1984 is hereby incorporated by reference to TDS’s Registration Statement on Form S-2, No. 2-92307.
10.2(a)	Supplemental Benefit Agreement for LeRoy T. Carlson dated March 21, 1980, as amended March 20, 1981 is hereby incorporated by reference to an exhibit to TDS’s Registration Statement on Form S-7, No. 2-74615.
10.2(b)	Memorandum of Amendment to Supplemental Benefit Agreement dated May 28, 1991 is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2(b) to TDS’s Annual Report Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1991.
10.3	Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. 1994 Long-Term Incentive Plan is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to TDS’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-57257).
10.4	Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan, an amendment and restatement of the 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan, is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit C to TDS’s definitive Notice to Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement dated May 28, 2004.
10.5	Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan of TDS is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to TDS’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.
10.6	Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of TDS’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-103540).
10.7	Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of TDS’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-103541).
10.8	Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. 2005 Bonus Deferral Agreement between LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. and Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. dated December 17, 2004 is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 17, 2004.
10.9	Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. 2005 Bonus Deferral Agreement between LeRoy T. Carlson and Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. dated December 17, 2004 is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 17, 2004.
10.10	United States Cellular Corporation Regional Support Organization (Corporate) Executive Officer Annual Bonus Plan Effective January 1, 2004, as amended, is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the United States Cellular Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 4, 2005.
10.11	United States Cellular Corporation 2003 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended, is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit B to United States Cellular Corporation’s Notice of Annual Meeting to Shareholders and Proxy Statement dated April 17, 2003.
10.12	United States Cellular Corporation 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of United States Cellular Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-103543).
10.13	Executive Deferred Compensation Agreement—Phantom Stock Account for 2005 between John E. Rooney and United States Cellular Corporation dated December 17, 2004 is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to United States Cellular Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 17, 2004.
10.14	Executive Deferred Compensation Agreement—Phantom Stock Account for 2006 between John E. Rooney and United States Cellular Corporation dated December 17, 2004 is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to United States Cellular Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 17, 2004.

58

Exhibit Number	Description
10.15	Executive Deferred Compensation Agreement—Interest Account for 2005 between John E. Rooney and United States Cellular Corporation dated December 17, 2004 is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to United States Cellular Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 17, 2004.
10.16	Executive Deferred Compensation Agreement for James Barr III dated January 1, 1998, is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to TDS’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.
10.17	Summary of Employment Agreement with James Barr III is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to TDS’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.
10.18	TDS Telecom 2004 Executive Team Performance Award Program is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to TDS’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004.
10.34	Form of TDS Corporate Officer 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan Stock Option Award Agreement is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to TDS’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 4, 2005.
10.35	Form of TDS Corporate Officer 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to TDS’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 4, 2005.
10.36	Form of James Barr TDS Telecom Director/Officer 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan Stock Option Award Agreement is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to TDS’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 4, 2005.
10.37	Form of TDS Telecom Director/Officer 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to TDS’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 4, 2005.
10.38	Form of U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan Stock Option Award Agreement, is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to U.S. Cellular’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 4, 2005.
10.39	Form of U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to U.S. Cellular’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 4, 2005.

59

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.:

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements, of management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting referred to in our report dated March 11, 2005, except for the restatement discussed under the heading “Restatement” in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements and the matter discussed in the penultimate paragraph of Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, as to which the date is April 26, 2006, incorporated by reference in Item 8 of this Form 10-K/A also included an audit of the financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(a)(2) of this Form 10-K/A. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements.

As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statement schedule, the Company restated its financial statement schedule for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chicago, Illinois

March 11, 2005, except for Note 1 as to which the date is April 26, 2006

S-1

TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

				Additions
Description	Balance at Beginning of Period			Charged to Costs and Expenses			Charged to Other Accounts		Deductions		Balance at End of Period
Column A	Column B			Column C-1			Column C-2		Column D		Column E
				(Dollars in thousands)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004
Deducted from deferred tax asset:
For unrealized net operating losses	$	(43,006	)	$	(16,658	)	$	4,359	$	—	$	(55,305	)
Deducted from accounts receivable:
For doubtful accounts (as restated)	(24,055		)	(56,372		)	—		62,940		(17,487		)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2003
Deducted from deferred tax asset:
For unrealized net operating losses	(34,635		)	(14,845		)	6,474		—		(43,006		)
Deducted from accounts receivable:
For doubtful accounts (as restated)	(40,313		)	(62,353		)	—		78,611		(24,055		)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2002
Deducted from deferred tax asset:
For unrealized net operating losses	(35,927		)	(17,665		)	18,957		—		(34,635		)
Deducted from accounts receivable:
For doubtful accounts (as restated)	$	(13,459	)	$	(90,012	)	$	—	$	63,158	$	(40,313	)

Note 1 - Restatement

As discussed under the heading “Restatement” in Note 1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements, TDS and its audit committee concluded on November 9, 2005, that TDS would amend its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 to restate its financial statements and financial information for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 including quarterly information for 2004 and 2003, and certain selected financial data for the years 2001 and 2000. TDS and its audit committee also concluded that TDS would amend its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periods ended March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2005 to restate the financial statements and financial information included therewith.

S-2

The restatement included correction of errors in accounting for contract termination fees billed to customers, operations of consolidated partnerships managed by a third party and income taxes. U.S. Cellular corrected its accounting to record revenues related to contract termination fees only upon collection, in recognition of the fact that the collectibility of the revenues was not reasonably assured at the time of billing. U.S. Cellular also corrected its accounting for operations of consolidated partnerships managed by a third party to recognize results of operations in the appropriate period based on the partnerships’ actual results of operations reported in such periods. The allowance for doubtful accounts was affected by these corrections. A reconciliation of deferred tax assets and liabilities resulted in a correction of deferred tax assets related to state net operating losses and the corresponding valuation allowances on the deferred tax assets. As a result, the categories noted below for the financial statement schedule information relating to the allowance for doubtful accounts and valuation allowances for deferred tax assets for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 have been restated. The impact of the restatement for the years ending December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 is as follows:

					Additions
Description	Balance at Beginning of Period				Charged to Costs and Expenses				Charged to Other Accounts			Deductions				Balance at End of Period
					Column				Column			Column
Column A	Column B				C-1				C-2			D				Column E
(Dollars in thousands)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004
Deducted from deferred tax asset:
For unrealized net operating losses
As Previously Reported	$	(67,209		)	$	(18,119		)	$	—		$	—			$	(85,328		)
Adjustment	24,203				1,461				4,359			—				30,023
As Restated	(43,006			)	(16,658			)	4,359			—				(55,305			)
Deducted from accounts receivable:
For doubtful accounts
As Previously Reported			(25,327	)			(86,938	)			—			87,322				(24,943	)
Adjustment	1,272				30,566				—			(24,382			)	7,456
As Restated	(24,055			)	(56,372			)	—			62,940				(17,487			)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2003
Deducted from deferred tax asset:
For unrealized net operating losses
As Previously Reported	(54,816			)	(12,393			)	—			—				(67,209			)
Adjustment	20,181				(2,452			)	6,474			—				24,203
As Restated	(34,635			)	(14,845			)	6,474			—				(43,006			)
Deducted from accounts receivable:
For doubtful accounts
As Previously Reported	(40,475			)	(65,379			)	—			80,527				(25,327			)
Adjustment	162				3,026				—			(1,916			)	1,272
As Restated	(40,313			)	(62,353			)	—			78,611				(24,055			)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2002
Deducted from deferred tax asset:
For unrealized net operating losses
As Previously Reported	(35,927			)	(18,889			)	—			—				(54,816			)
Adjustment	—				1,224				18,957			—				20,181
As Restated	(35,927			)	(17,665			)	18,957			—				(34,635			)
Deducted from accounts receivable:
For doubtful accounts
As Previously Reported	(13,657			)	(84,897			)	—			58,079				(40,475			)
Adjustment	198				(5,115			)	—			5,079				162
As Restated	$		(13,459	)	$		(90,012	)	$		—	$		63,158		$		(40,313	)

S-3

LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TDS’s investment in Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership is accounted for by the equity method. Pursuant to Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X, TDS is required to include audited financial statements of such investment in this Form 10-K/A filing. The partnership’s financial statements were obtained by TDS as a limited partner. Through U.S. Cellular (an 82.0% subsidiary of TDS), TDS’s ownership percentage of Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership is 5.5%.

S-4

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Partners of Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership:

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners’ capital, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Partnership as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

New York, New York

March 10, 2005

S-5

LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in Thousands)

	December 31,
	2004		2003
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $11,853 and $20,191	$	193,909	$	160,520
Unbilled revenue	22,121		17,172
Due from General Partner	405,230		255,728
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	2,838		1,969
Total current assets	624,098		435,389
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT—Net	1,279,261		1,182,528
WIRELESS LICENSES	80,018		79,954
OTHER ASSETS	275		506
TOTAL ASSETS	$	1,983,652	$	1,698,377
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	90,537	$	69,788
Advance billings	65,851		55,809
Deferred gain on lease transaction	4,923		4,923
Total current liabilities	161,311		130,520
DEFERRED GAIN ON LEASE TRANSACTION	72,947		77,870
Total liabilities	234,258		208,390
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (see Notes 6 and 8)
PARTNERS’ CAPITAL	1,749,394		1,489,987
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL	$	1,983,652	$	1,698,377

See notes to financial statements.

S-6

LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Dollars in Thousands)

	Years Ended December 31
	2004		2003			2002
OPERATING REVENUES:
Service revenues	$	2,074,845	$	1,723,103		$	1,520,194
Equipment and other	225,632		147,468			137,334
Total operating revenues	2,300,477		1,870,571			1,657,528
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Cost of service (excluding depreciation and amortization related to network assets included below)	266,299		197,188			215,522
Cost of equipment	325,093		225,685			208,835
Selling, general and administrative	764,425		732,056			693,151
Depreciation and amortization	216,317		199,521			166,684
Loss (Gain) on disposal of property, plant and equipment	1,558		(6,840		)	314
Total operating costs and expenses	1,573,692		1,347,610			1,284,506
OPERATING INCOME	726,785		522,961			373,022
OTHER INCOME:
Interest income, net	27,699		15,029			19,571
Other, net	4,923		4,923			4,923
Total other income	32,622		19,952			24,494
NET INCOME	$	759,407	$	542,913		$	397,516
Allocation of Net Income:
Limited partners	$	455,644	$	325,748		$	238,509
General partner	$	303,763	$	217,165		$	159,007

See notes to financial statements.

S-7

LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002

(Dollars in Thousands)

	General Partner			Limited Partners
	AirTouch Cellular			AirTouch Cellular			Cellco Partnership				United States Cellular Corporation			Total Partners Capital
BALANCE—January 1, 2002	$	551,283		$	582,985		$	168,141			$	75,801		$	1,378,210
Distributions	(120,000		)	(126,900		)	(36,600			)	(16,500		)	(300,000			)
Net income	159,007			168,149			48,497				21,863			397,516
BALANCE—December 31, 2002	590,290			624,234			180,038				81,164			1,475,726
Distributions	(211,461		)	(223,620		)	(64,495			)	(29,076		)	(528,652			)
Net income	217,165			229,652			66,236				29,860			542,913
BALANCE—December 31, 2003	595,994			630,266			181,779				81,948			1,489,987
Distributions	(200,000		)	(211,500		)	(61,000			)	(27,500		)	(500,000			)
Net income	303,763			321,228			92,647				41,769			759,407
BALANCE—December 31, 2004	$	699,757		$	739,994		$		213,426		$	96,217		$		1,749,394

See notes to financial statements.

S-8

LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in thousands)

	Years Ended December 31,
	2004			2003			2002
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	759,407		$	542,913		$	397,516
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	216,317			199,521			166,684
Net (gain) loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment	1,558			(6,840		)	314
Provision for losses on accounts receivable	15,609			33,688			35,694
Amortization of gain on lease transaction	(4,923		)	(4,923		)	(4,923		)
Changes in certain assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable and unbilled revenue	(53,947		)	(37,347		)	(77,218		)
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(869		)	76			480
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	20,749			2,196			(58,149		)
Advance billings	10,042			33,010			(137		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	963,943			762,294			460,261
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures including purchases from affiliates, net	(314,441		)	(240,259		)	(278,588		)
Acquisition of wireless licenses	—			—			(45,075		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(314,441		)	(240,259		)	(323,663		)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
(Increase) Decrease in Due from General Partner	(149,502		)	6,617			163,402
Distributions to partners	(500,000		)	(528,652		)	(300,000		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(649,502		)	(522,035		)	(136,598		)
CHANGE IN CASH	—			—			—
CASH—Beginning of year	—			—			—
CASH—End of year	$	—		$	—		$	—

See notes to financial statements.

S-9

LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002

(Dollars in Thousands)

1.ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT

Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership—Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”) was formed on January 1, 1984. The principal activity of the Partnership is providing cellular service in the Los Angeles metropolitan service area.

The partners and their respective ownership percentages as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 are as follows:

General Partner:
AirTouch Cellular* (“General Partner”)	40.0	%
Limited Partners:
AirTouch Cellular*	42.3	%
Cellco Partnership	12.2	%
United States Cellular Corporation	5.5	%

*AirTouch Cellular is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Verizon Wireless (“VAW”) LLC (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cellco Partnership (“Cellco”) doing business as Verizon Wireless).

2.SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates are used for, but not limited to, the accounting for: allocations, allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable, unbilled revenue, fair value of financial instruments, depreciation and amortization, useful lives and impairment of assets, accrued expenses, and contingencies. Estimates and assumptions are periodically reviewed and the effects of any material revisions are reflected in the financial statements in the period that they are determined to be necessary.

Reclassifications—Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year financial statements to conform to the current year presentation.

Revenue Recognition—The Partnership earns revenue by providing access to the network (access revenue) and for usage of the network (airtime/usage revenue), which includes roaming and long distance revenue. In general, access revenue is billed one month in advance and is recognized when earned; the unearned portion is classified in advance billings. Airtime/usage revenue, roaming revenue and long distance revenue are recognized when service is rendered and included in unbilled revenue until billed. Equipment sales revenue associated with the sale of wireless handsets and accessories is recognized when the products are delivered to and accepted by the customer, as this is considered to be a separate earnings process from the sale of wireless services. The Partnership’s revenue recognition policies are in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements and SAB No. 104, Revenue Recognition.

S-10

Operating Expenses—Operating expenses include expenses incurred directly by the Partnership, as well as an allocation of certain administrative and operating costs incurred by Cellco or its affiliates on behalf of the Partnership (see note 5). Services performed on behalf of the Partnership are provided by employees of Cellco. These employees are not employees of the Partnership and therefore, operating expenses include direct and allocated charges of salary and employee benefit costs for the services provided to the Partnership. The Partnership believes such allocations, principally based on the Partnerships percentage of total customers, customer gross additions or minutes-of-use, are reasonable.

Income Taxes—The Partnership is not a taxable entity for federal and state income tax purposes. Any taxable income or loss is apportioned to the partners based on their respective partnership interests and is reported by them individually.

Inventory—Inventory is owned by Cellco and held on consignment by the Partnership. Such consigned inventory is not recorded on the Partnership’s financial statements. Upon sale, the related cost of the inventory is transferred to the Partnership at Cellco’s cost basis and included in the accompanying Statements of Operations.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts—The Partnership maintains allowances for uncollectible accounts receivable for estimated losses resulting from the inability of customers to make required payments. Estimates are based on the aging of the accounts receivable balances and the historical write-off experience, net of recoveries.

Property, Plant and Equipment—Property, plant and equipment primarily represents costs incurred to construct and expand capacity and network coverage on Mobile Telephone Switching Offices (“MTSOs”) and cell sites. The cost of property, plant and equipment is depreciated over its estimated useful life using the straight-line method of accounting. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the term of the related lease. Major improvements to existing plant and equipment are capitalized. Routine maintenance and repairs that do not extend the life of the plant and equipment are charged to expense as incurred.

Upon the sale or retirement of property, plant and equipment, the cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization is eliminated from the accounts and any related gain or loss is reflected in the Statements of Operations.

Network engineering costs incurred during the construction phase of the Partnership’s network and real estate properties under development are capitalized as part of property, plant and equipment and recorded as construction-in-progress until the projects are completed and placed into service.

FCC Licenses—The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) issues licenses that authorize cellular carriers to provide service in specific cellular geographic service areas. The FCC grants licenses for terms of up to ten years. In 1993 the FCC adopted specific standards to apply to cellular renewals, concluding it will reward a license renewal to a cellular licensee that meets certain standards of past performance. Historically, the FCC has granted license renewals routinely.

Valuation of Assets—Long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment and intangible assets with finite lives, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cashflows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. The impairment loss, if determined to be necessary, would be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. The FCC licenses recorded on the books of Cellco are evaluated for impairment, by Cellco, under the guidance set forth in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.”

S-11

The FCC licenses are treated as an indefinite life intangible asset under the provisions of SFAS No. 142 and are not amortized, but rather are tested for impairment annually or between annual dates, if events or circumstances warrant. All of the licenses in Cellco’s nationwide footprint are tested in the aggregate for impairment under SFAS No. 142. When testing the carrying value of the wireless licenses for impairment, Cellco determines the fair value of the aggregated wireless licenses by subtracting from enterprise discounted cash flows (net of debt) the fair value of all of the other net tangible and intangible assets of Cellco, including previously unrecognized intangible assets. This approach is generally referred to as the residual method. In addition, the fair value of the aggregated wireless licenses is then subjected to a reasonableness analysis using public information of comparable wireless carriers. If the fair value of the aggregated wireless licenses as determined above is less than the aggregated carrying amount of the licenses, an impairment will be recognized by Cellco. Any impairment loss recognized by Cellco will be allocated to its consolidated subsidiaries based upon a reasonable methodology. No impairment was recognized in 2004, 2003 and 2002.

On September 29, 2004, the SEC issued a Staff Announcement regarding the “Use of the Residual Method to Value Acquired Assets other than Goodwill.” The Staff Announcement requires SEC registrants to adopt a direct value method of assigning value to intangible assets, including wireless licenses, acquired in a business combination under SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations,” effective for all business combinations completed after September 29, 2004. Further, all intangible assets, including wireless licenses, valued under the residual method prior to this adoption are required to be tested for impairment using a direct value method no later than the beginning of 2005. Any impairment of intangible assets recognized upon application of a direct value method by entities previously applying the residual method should be reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. Under this Staff Announcement, the reclassification of recorded balances from wireless licenses to goodwill prior to the adoption of this Staff Announcement is prohibited. Cellco has evaluated its wireless licenses for potential impairment using a direct value methodology effective January 1, 2005. The valuation and analyses prepared in connection with the adoption of a direct value method resulted in no adjustment to the carrying value of its wireless licenses, and accordingly, had no effect on its results of operations and financial position. Future tests for impairment will be performed by Cellco at least annually and more often if events or circumstances warrant.

Concentrations—To the extent the Partnership’s customer receivables become delinquent, collection activities commence. No single customer is large enough to present a significant financial risk to the Partnership. The Partnership maintains an allowance for losses based on the expected collectibility of accounts receivable.

The General Partner relies on local and long distance telephone companies, some of whom are related parties, and other companies to provide certain communication services. Although management believes alternative telecommunications facilities could be found in a timely manner, any disruption of these services could potentially have an adverse impact on the Partnership’s operating results.

Although Cellco and the General Partner attempt to maintain multiple vendors for, each required product, their network assets and inventory, which are important components of their operations, they are currently acquired from only a few sources. Certain of these products are in turn utilized by the Partnership and are important components of the Partnership’s operations. If the suppliers are unable to meet Cellco’s needs as it builds out its network infrastructure and sells service and equipment, delays and increased costs in the expansion of the Partnership’s network infrastructure or losses of potential customers could result, which would adversely affect operating results.

Financial Instruments—The Partnership’s trade receivables and payables are short-term in nature, and accordingly, their carrying value approximates fair value.

Segments—The Partnership has one reportable business segment and operates domestically only. The Partnership’s products and services are materially comprised of wireless telecommunications services.

S-12

Due from General Partner—Due from General Partner principally represents the Partnership’s cash position. Cellco manages, on behalf of the General Partner, all cash, inventory, investing and financing activities of the Partnership. As such, the change in due from General Partner is reflected as a financing activity in the Statements of Cash Flows. Additionally, administrative and operating costs incurred by Cellco on behalf of the General Partner, as well as property, plant, and equipment transactions with affiliates, are charged to the Partnership through this account. Interest income is based on the average monthly outstanding balance in this account and is calculated by applying the General Partner’s average cost of borrowing from Verizon Global Funding, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Verizon Communications, Inc., which was approximately 5.9%, 5.0% and 5.0% for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Included in net interest income is $27,943, $15,255 and $19,521 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, related to the due from General Partner.

Distributions—The Partnership is required to make distributions to its partners on a quarterly basis based upon the Partnership’s operating results, cash availability and financing needs as determined by the General Partner at the date of the distribution.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements—In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Non monetary Assets—An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29.” This standard eliminates the exception from fair value measurement for non-monetary exchanges of similar productive assets. A non monetary exchange shall be measured based on the recorded amount of the non monetary asset(s) relinquished, and not on the fair values of the exchanged assets, if a) the fair value is not determinable, b) the exchange transaction is to facilitate sales to customers, or c) the exchange transaction lacks commercial substance. This statement specifies that a non-monetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. The Partnership will adopt the standard effective January 1, 2006. The Partnership does not expect the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 153 to have a material effect on the Partnership’s financial statements.

3.PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment consists of the following as of December 31, 2004 and 2003:

	2004		2003
Land and improvements	$	4,475	$	4,483
Buildings and improvements (10-40 years)	335,926		300,211
Cellular plant equipment (3-15 years)	1,827,309		1,595,940
Furniture, fixtures and equipment (2-5 years)	77,049		87,168
Leasehold improvements (5 years)	71,745		68,596
	2,316,504		2,056,398
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization	1,037,243		873,870
Property, plant and equipment, net	$	1,279,261	$	1,182,528

Property, plant, and equipment includes the following:

Capitalized network engineering costs of $10,690 and $10,130 were recorded during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Construction-in-progress included in certain of the classifications shown above, principally cellular plant equipment, amounted to $48,153 and $20,356 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Depreciation and amortization expense, including amortization of other intangibles, for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $216,317, $199,521 and $166,684, respectively.

S-13

Tower Transactions—Prior to the acquisition of the Partnership interest by Cellco in 2000, Vodafone Group Plc (“Vodafone”), then parent company of AirTouch Cellular, entered into agreements to sublease all of its unused space on up to 430 of its communications towers (“Sublease Agreement”) to SpectraSite Holdings, Inc. (“Spectrasite”) in exchange for $155,000. There are 274 towers owned and operated by the Partnership included in the Sublease Agreement. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Partnership has $77,870 and $82,793, respectively, recorded as deferred gain on lease transaction. The Sublease Agreement requires monthly maintenance fees for the existing physical space used by the Partnership’s cellular equipment. The terms of the Sublease Agreement differ for leased communication towers versus those owned by the Partnership and range from 20 to 99 years. The Partnership paid $8,239, $8,241 and $8,151 to Spectrasite pursuant to the Sublease Agreement for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, which is included in cost of service (see Note 5).

4.ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities consist of the following:

	2004		2003
Accounts payable	$	40,036	$	12,269
Non income taxes and regulatory fees	33,014		40,156
Accrued commissions	17,487		17,363
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	90,537	$	69,788

5.TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Significant transactions with affiliates, including allocations and direct charges, are summarized as follows for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002:

	2004			2003			2002
Service revenues (a)	$	6,916		$	(616	)	$	1,831
Equipment and other revenues (b)	(23,196		)	(20,975		)	8,295
Cost of service (c)	87,483			49,132			45,653
Equipment costs (d)	39,422			69,911			27,939
Selling, general and administrative expenses (e)	520,122			469,242			446,766

(a)Service revenues include long distance, paging, data and allocated contra revenues including revenue concessions.

(b)Equipment and other revenues include sales of handsets and accessories and allocated contra revenues including equipment concessions and coupon rebates.

(c)Cost of service includes direct telecom, long distance, paging, and handset applications.

(d)Equipment costs include warehousing, freight, handsets, accessories, and upgrades.

(e)Selling, general and administrative expenses include office telecom, customer care, billing, salaries, sales and marketing, advertising, and commissions.

Revenues and expenses were allocated based on the Partnership’s percentage of customers, gross customer additions or minutes of use where applicable. The Partnership believes the allocations are reasonable.

The Partnership also receives roaming revenue from affiliates for use of the Partnership’s network and incurs roaming costs for use of affiliates’ networks. Roaming revenues were $124,306, $83,330 and $92,594 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Roaming costs were $146,879, $100,986 and $126,371 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Substantially all of these roaming revenue and cost transactions were with affiliates.

The Partnership had transfers and purchases involving plant, property, and equipment with affiliates having a net cost of $203,940, $196,272 and $179,258 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

S-14

6.COMMITMENTS

The General Partner, on behalf of the Partnership, and the Partnership itself have entered into operating leases for facilities and equipment used in its operations. Lease contracts include renewal options that include rent expense adjustments based on the Consumer Price Index as well as annual and end-of-lease term adjustments. Rent expense is recorded on a straight-line basis. The noncancellable lease term used to calculate the amount of the straight-line rent expense is generally determined to be the initial lease term, including any optional renewal terms that are reasonably assured. Leasehold improvements related to these operating leases are amortized over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the noncancellable lease term. For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Partnership recognized a total of $38,414, $32,478 and $28,838, respectively, as rent expense related to payments under these operating leases, which is included in cost of service and selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying Statements of Operations.

Future minimum rental commitments under noncancelable operating leases, excluding renewal options not reasonably assured for the years shown are as follows:

	Year
2005	$	39,824
2006	28,626
2007	22,483
2008	17,042
2009	12,244
2010 and thereafter	73,773
Total minimum payments	$	193,992

7.VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

	Balance at Beginning of the Year		Additions Charged to Operations		Write-offs Net of Recoveries			Balance at End of the Year
Accounts Receivable Allowances:
2004	$	20,191	$	15,609	$	(23,947	)	$	11,853
2003	33,929		33,688		(47,426		)	20,191
2002	32,660		35,694		(34,425		)	33,929

8.CONTINGENCIES

Cellco is subject to various lawsuits and other claims including class actions, product liability, patent infringement, antitrust, partnership disputes, and claims involving relations with resellers and agents. Cellco is also defending lawsuits filed against itself and other participants in the wireless industry alleging various adverse effects as a result of wireless phone usage. Various consumer class action lawsuits allege that Cellco breached contracts with consumers, violated certain state consumer protection laws and other statutes and defrauded customers through concealed or misleading billing practices. Certain of these lawsuits and other claims may impact the Partnership. These litigation matters may involve indemnification obligations by third parties and/or affiliated parties covering all or part of any potential damage awards against Cellco and the Partnership and/or insurance coverage. Attorney Generals in a number of states also are investigating certain sales, marketing and advertising practices. All of the above matters are subject to many uncertainties, and outcomes are not predictable with assurance.

The Partnership may be allocated a portion of the damages that may result upon adjudication of these matters if the claimants prevail in their actions. Consequently, the ultimate liability with respect to these matters at December 31, 2004 cannot be ascertained. The potential effect, if any, on the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership, in the period in which these matters are resolved, may be material.

In addition to the aforementioned matters, Cellco is subject to various other legal actions and claims in the normal course of business. While Cellco’s legal counsel cannot give assurance as to the outcome of each of these matters, in management’s opinion, based on the advice of such legal counsel, the ultimate liability with respect to any of these actions, or all of them combined, will not materially affect the financial position or operating results of the Partnership.

******

S-15

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
By:	/s/ LEROY T. CARLSON, JR.
	LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr.
	President, (Chief Executive Officer)
By:	/s/ SANDRA L. HELTON
	Sandra L. Helton
	Executive Vice President
	(Chief Financial Officer)
By:	/s/ D. MICHAEL JACK
	D. Michael Jack
	Senior Vice President and Controller
	(Principal Accounting Officer)

Dated April  26, 2006

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ LEROY T. CARLSON, JR.	Director	April 26, 2006
LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr.
/s/ LEROY T. CARLSON	Director	April 26, 2006
LeRoy T. Carlson
/s/ SANDRA L. HELTON	Director	April 26, 2006
Sandra L. Helton
/s/ JAMES BARR III	Director	April 26, 2006
James Barr III
/s/ WALTER C.D. CARLSON	Director	April 26, 2006
Walter C.D. Carlson
/s/ LETITIA G.C. CARLSON	Director	April 26, 2006
Letitia G.C. Carlson
/s/ HERBERT S. WANDER	Director	April 26, 2006
Herbert S. Wander
/s/ DONALD C. NEBERGALL	Director	April 26, 2006
Donald C. Nebergall
/s/ GEORGE W. OFF	Director	April 26, 2006
George W. Off
/s/ MARTIN L. SOLOMON	Director	April 26, 2006
Martin L. Solomon
/s/ MITCHELL H. SARANOW	Director	April 26, 2006
Mitchell H. Saranow

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit Number	Description of Document
2.1	Exchange Agreement dated March 7, 2003 between United States Cellular Corporation and AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to United States Cellular Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
2.2	Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement between United States Cellular Corporation and AT&T Wireless Services, Inc., dated as of November 26, 2003 is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to United States Cellular Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 26, 2003, filed December 2, 2003.
3.1(a)	Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to TDS’s Report on Form 8-A/A filed on July 10, 1998.
3.1(b)	Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to TDS’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.
3.2	Restated Bylaws, as amended, are hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to TDS’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.
4.1(a)	Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to TDS’s Report on Form 8-A/A filed on July 10, 1998.
4.1(b)	Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to TDS’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.
4.2	Restated By-laws as amended, are hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to TDS’s Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.
4.3(a)	The Indenture between TDS and BNY Midwest Trust Company of New York as successor Trustee to Harris Trust and Savings Bank, dated February 1, 1991, under which TDS’s Medium-Term Notes are issued, is hereby incorporated by reference to TDS’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 19, 1991.
4.3(b)	Form of First Supplemental Indenture with BNY Midwest Trust Company of New York as successor Trustee to Harris Trust and Savings Bank is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1(b) of Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3 (Registration No. 33-68456).
4.4(a)	The Indenture between TDS and BNY Midwest Trust Company, dated November 1, 2001, under which TDS’s 7.60% Series A Notes are issuable, is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to TDS’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001.
4.4(b)	The First Supplemental Indenture dated November 28, 2001, between TDS and BNY Midwest Trust Company, establishing TDS’s 7.60% Series A Notes, is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to TDS’s Report on Form 8-A, filed on November 29, 2001.
4.4(c)	Second Supplemental Indenture dated May 31, 2002, by and between Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. and BNY Midwest Trust Company, making changes to the First Supplemental Indenture, is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to TDS’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002.
4.5	Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement dated December 9, 2004 among TDS and the lenders named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, TD Securities (USA) LLC, as syndication agent, Wachovia Bank, National Association, LaSalle Bank National Association and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, LTD., Chicago Branch, each as documentation agents, is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to TDS’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 9, 2004, filed December 13, 2004.
4.6	Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement dated December 9, 2004 among United States Cellular Corporation the lenders named therein, Toronto Dominion (Texas) LLC, as administrative agent, Wachovia Capital Markets, as syndication agent, and Citibank, N.A. and LaSalle Bank National Association as co-documentation agents is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to United States Cellular Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 9, 2004, filed December 13, 2004.

Exhibit Number	Description of Document
4.7(a)	Indenture dated June 1, 2002 between United States Cellular Corporation and BNY Midwest Trust Company of New York, is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form S-3 (File No. 333-98921).
4.7(b)	Form of Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 3, 2003 between United States Cellular Corporation and BNY Midwest Trust Company, relating to $444,000,000 of United States Cellular Corporation’s 6.70% Senior Notes due 2033 is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to United States Cellular Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 3, 2003, filed December 4, 2003.
4.7(c)	Form of Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 9, 2004 between United States Cellular Corporation and BNY Midwest Trust Company, relating to $330,000,000 of United States Cellular Corporation’s 7.50% Senior Notes due 2032 is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to United States Cellular Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 9, 2004, filed June 10, 2004.
4.7(d)	Form of Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 21, 2004 between United States Cellular Corporation and BNY Midwest Trust Company, relating to $100,000,000 of United States Cellular Corporation’s 6.70% Senior Notes due 2033 is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to United States Cellular Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 21, 2004, filed June 22, 2004.
9.1(a)	Voting Trust Agreement, dated as of June 30, 1989, is hereby incorporated by reference to an exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to TDS’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 33-12943.
9.1(b)	Amendment dated as of May 9, 1991 to the Voting Trust Agreement dated as of June 30, 1989, is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 9.2 to TDS’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1991.
9.1(c)	Amendment dated as of November 20, 1992, to the Voting Trust Agreement dated as of June 30, 1989, as amended, is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 9.1(c) to TDS’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1992.
9.1(d)	Amendment dated as of May 22, 1998, to the Voting Trust Agreement dated as of June 30, 1989, as amended, is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to TDS’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 5, 1998.
9.1(e)	Amendment effective as of March 28, 2003, to the Voting Trust Agreement dated as of June 30, 1989, as amended is incorporated by reference to Item 7(e) of the Schedule 13D filed by such Voting Trust dated March 28, 2003.
9.1(f)	Amendment effective as of March 28, 2003, to the Voting Trust Agreement dated as of June 30, 1989, as amended is incorporated by reference to Item 7(f) of the Schedule 13D filed by such Voting Trust dated March 28, 2003.
10.1	Salary Continuation Agreement for LeRoy T. Carlson dated May 20, 1977, as amended May 22, 1981 and May 25, 1984 is hereby incorporated by reference to TDS’s Registration Statement on Form S-2, No. 2-92307.
10.2(a)	Supplemental Benefit Agreement for LeRoy T. Carlson dated March 21, 1980, as amended March 20, 1981, is hereby incorporated by reference to an exhibit to TDS’s Registration Statement on Form S-7, No. 2-74615.
10.2(b)	Memorandum of Amendment to Supplemental Benefit Agreement dated as of May 28, 1991, is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2(b) to TDS’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1991.
10.3	Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. 1994 Long-Term Incentive Plan is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to TDS’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-57257).
10.4	Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan, an amendment and restatement of the 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended, is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit C to TDS’s definitive Notice to Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement dated May 28, 2004.
10.5	Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to TDS’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.

Exhibit Number	Description of Document
10.6	Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of TDS’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-103540).
10.7	Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of TDS’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-103541).
10.8	Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. 2005 Bonus Deferral Agreement between LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. and Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. dated December 17, 2004 is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 17, 2004.
10.9	Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. 2005 Bonus Deferral Agreement between LeRoy T. Carlson and Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. dated December 17, 2004 is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 17, 2004.
10.10	United States Cellular Corporation Regional Support Organization (Corporate) Executive Officer Annual Bonus Plan Effective January 1, 2004, as amended, is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the United States Cellular Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 4, 2005.
10.11	United States Cellular Corporation 2003 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended, is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit B to United States Cellular Corporation’s Notice of Annual Meeting to Shareholders and Proxy Statement dated April 17, 2003.
10.12	United States Cellular Corporation 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of United States Cellular Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-103543).
10.13	Executive Deferred Compensation Agreement—Phantom Stock Account for 2005 between John E. Rooney and United States Cellular Corporation dated December 17, 2004 is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to United States Cellular Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 17, 2004.
10.14	Executive Deferred Compensation Agreement—Phantom Stock Account for 2006 between John E. Rooney and U.S. Cellular dated December 17, 2004 is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to United States Cellular Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 17, 2004.
10.15	Executive Deferred Compensation Agreement—Interest Account for 2005 between John E. Rooney and U.S. Cellular dated December 17, 2004 is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to United States Cellular Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 17, 2004.
10.16	Executive Deferred Compensation Agreement for James Barr III dated January 1, 1998 is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to TDS’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.
10.17	Summary of Employment Agreement with James Barr III is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to TDS’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.
10.18	TDS Telecom 2004 Executive Team Performance Award Program is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to TDS’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004.
10.19	Amended and Restated CDMA Master Supply Agreement between United States Cellular Corporation and Nortel Networks Inc., is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to United States Cellular Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002.
10.20	Guarantee dated as of July 29, 2002, by Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. in favor of Credit Suisse First Boston International relating to monetization of Deutsche Telekom ordinary shares is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to TDS’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.
10.21	Guarantee dated as of July 31, 2002, by Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. in favor of Credit Suisse First Boston International relating to monetization of Deutsche Telekom ordinary shares is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to TDS’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.

Exhibit Number	Description of Document
10.22	Guaranty dated as of August 19, 2002, by Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. in favor of Citibank N.A. relating to monetization of Deutsche Telekom ordinary shares is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to TDS’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.
10.23	Guarantee dated as of August 22, 2002, by Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. in favor of Credit Suisse First Boston International relating to monetization of Deutsche Telekom ordinary shares is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to TDS’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.
10.24	Guaranty, dated August 21, 2002, by Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. in favor of The Toronto-Dominion Bank relating to monetization of Deutsche Telekom ordinary shares is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to TDS’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
10.25	Guarantee, dated October 21, 2002, by Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank relating to monetization of Vodafone Group American Depositary Receipts is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to TDS’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
10.26	Guaranty, dated October 22, 2002, by Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. in favor of Societe Generale relating to monetization of Deutsche Telekom ordinary shares is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to TDS’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
10.27	Guarantee, dated November 6, 2002, by Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank relating to monetization of Deutsche Telekom ordinary shares is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to TDS’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
10.28	Guarantee, dated November 12, 2002, by Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank relating to monetization of Deutsche Telekom ordinary shares is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to TDS’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
10.29	Guaranty, dated December 5, 2002, by Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. in favor of West LB AG relating to monetization of Deutsche Telekom ordinary shares is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to TDS’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
10.30	Guaranty Agreement, dated as of May 14, 2002, by United States Cellular Corporation in favor of Citibank N.A. relating to monetization of Vodafone Group American Depositary Receipts is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to United States Cellular Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.
10.31	Guarantee Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2002, by United States Cellular Corporation in favor of Credit Suisse First Boston International relating to monetization of Vodafone Group American Depositary Receipts is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to United States Cellular Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.
10.32	Guaranty Agreement, dated as of May 15, 2002, by United States Cellular Corporation in favor of Toronto Dominion (New York) Inc. relating to monetization of Vodafone Group American Depositary Receipts is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to United States Cellular Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.
10.33	Guaranty Agreement, dated as of May 15, 2002, by United States Cellular Corporation in favor of Wachovia Bank, National Association relating to monetization of Vodafone Group American Depositary Receipts is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to United States Cellular Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.
10.34	Form of TDS Corporate Officer 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan Stock Option Award Agreement is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to TDS’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 4, 2005.
10.35	Form of TDS Corporate Officer 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to TDS’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 4, 2005.

Exhibit Number	Description of Document
10.36	Form of James Barr TDS Telecom Director/Officer 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan Stock Option Award Agreement is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to TDS’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 4, 2005.
10.37	Form of TDS Telecom Director/Officer 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to TDS’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 4, 2005.
10.38	Form of U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan Stock Option Award Agreement, is hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to U.S. Cellular’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 4, 2005.
10.39	Form of U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, is hereby
	incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to U.S. Cellular’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 4, 2005.
11	Statement regarding computation of earnings per share (included in Footnote 3 to financial statements in Exhibit 13).
12	Statement regarding computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000.
13	Incorporated portions of 2004 Annual Report to Security Holders.
21	Subsidiaries of TDS (included in Original Form 10-K).
23.1	Consent of independent registered public accounting firm.
23.2	Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Deloitte & Touche LLP.
31.1	Chief Executive Officer certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
31.2	Chief Financial Officer certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
32.1	Chief Executive Officer certification pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
32.2	Chief Financial Officer certification pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.

30 North LaSalle Street

Chicago, Illinois 60602

312/630-1900

EX-12

Exhibit 12

TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

For the Year Ended December 31,

(Dollars in Thousands)

	2004 (as restated)				2003 (as restated)				2002 (as restated)				2001 (as restated)				2000 (as restated)
EARNINGS:
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interest	$	148,613			$	121,760			$	(1,556,654		)	$	(180,633		)	$	305,963
Add (deduct):
Earnings on equity method investments	(64,900			)	(52,179			)	(43,799			)	(51,291			)	(35,495			)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities	49,234				45,427				31,328				16,644				34,834
Minority interest in pre-tax income of subsidiaries that do not have fixed charges	(9,725			)	(11,842			)	(14,865			)	(9,724			)	(6,435			)
	123,222				103,166				(1,583,990			)	(225,004			)	298,867
Add fixed charges:
Consolidated interest expense	198,706				188,069				157,034				128,519				125,369
Interest portion (1/3) of consolidated rent expense	33,798				29,620				28,696				19,398				18,955
	$	355,726			$	320,855			$	(1,398,260		)	$	(77,087		)	$	443,191
FIXED CHARGES:
Consolidated interest expense	$		198,706		$		188,069		$		157,034		$		128,519		$		125,369
Interest portion (1/3) of consolidated rent expense	33,798				29,620				28,696				19,398				18,955
	$		232,504		$		217,689		$		185,730		$		147,917		$		144,324
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES	1.53				1.47				—			(a)	—			(b)	3.07
Tax-effected preferred dividends	$		300		$		652		$		750		$		824		$		886
Fixed charges	232,504				217,689				185,730				147,917				144,324
Fixed charges and preferred dividends	$		232,804		$		218,341		$		186,480		$		148,741		$		145,210
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS	1.53				1.47				—			(a)	—			(b)	3.05

(a)Earnings for the year ended December 31, 2002 were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $1,584.0 million and fixed charges and preferred dividends by $1,584.7 million. In the year ended December 31, 2002, TDS recognized a pre-tax loss on marketable securities and other investments of $1,888.4 million as a result of management’s determination that unrealized losses with respect to the investments were other than temporary and the write-off of a note receivable.

(b)Earnings for the year ended December 31, 2001 were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $225.0 million and fixed charges and preferred dividends by $225.8 million. In 2001, TDS recognized a pre-tax loss of $548.3 million primarily as a result of two merger transactions. The conversion of TDS’s investment in common stock of VoiceStream Wireless Corporation into shares of Deutsche Telekom and cash pursuant to a merger of VoiceStream and Deutsche Telekom resulted in a pre-tax loss of $644.9 million. The conversion of TDS’s investment in common stock of Illuminet Holding, Inc into shares of VeriSign, Inc. pursuant to a merger resulted in a pre-tax gain of $96.1 million. The loss and gain, respectively, were the result of the change in the market price of VoiceStream and Illuminet stocks between the time TDS acquired such stock and the date of the merger transactions.

EX-13

Exhibit 13

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. (“TDS”) is a diversified telecommunications company providing high-quality telecommunications services to approximately 6.1 million wireless telephone customers and wireline telephone equivalent access lines in 36 states at December 31, 2004. TDS conducts substantially all of its wireless telephone operations through its 82.0%-owned subsidiary, United States Cellular Corporation (“U.S. Cellular”), and its incumbent local exchange carrier and competitive local exchange carrier wireline telephone operations through its wholly owned subsidiary, TDS Telecommunications Corporation (“TDS Telecom”).  TDS conducts printing and distribution services through its 80%-owned subsidiary, Suttle Straus, which represents a small portion of TDS’s operations.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with TDS’s audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes included herein and the description of TDS’s business included in Item 1 of the TDS Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Restatement

TDS and its audit committee concluded on November 9, 2005, that TDS would amend its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 to restate its financial statements and financial information for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 including quarterly information for 2004 and 2003, and certain selected financial data for the years 2001 and 2000. TDS and its audit committee also concluded that TDS would amend its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periods ended March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2005 to restate the financial statements and financial information included therewith.

On November 11, 2005, TDS and U.S. Cellular announced that the staff of the Midwest Regional Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) had advised both companies that it was conducting an investigation into the restatement of financial statements announced by TDS and U.S. Cellular on November 10, 2005.  TDS and U.S. Cellular intend to cooperate fully with the SEC staff in this investigation.

The restatement adjustments principally correct items that were recorded in the financial statements previously but not in the proper periods and certain income tax, interest income and consolidation errors. Correction of the errors, with the exception of income taxes discussed below, individually did not have a material impact on income before income taxes and minority interest, net income or earnings per share; however, when aggregated, the items were considered to be material. The restatement adjustments to correct income tax accounting had a material impact individually on net income and earnings per share in prior periods. The restated financial statements are adjusted to record certain obligations in the periods such obligations were incurred, correct the timing of the reversal of certain tax liabilities, correct the consolidation of an 80% owned subsidiary, and record revenues in the periods such revenues were earned. The adjustments are described below.

•      Income taxes – In the restatement, TDS corrected its income tax expense, federal and state taxes payable, liabilities accrued for tax contingencies, deferred income tax assets and liabilities and related disclosures for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 for items identified based on a reconciliation of income tax accounts.  The reconciliation compared amounts used for financial reporting purposes to the amounts used in the preparation of the income tax returns, and took into consideration the results of federal and state income tax audits and the resulting book/tax basis differences which generate deferred tax assets and liabilities.  In addition, a review of the state deferred income tax rates used to establish deferred income tax assets and liabilities identified errors in the state income tax rate used which resulted in adjustments to correct the amount of deferred income tax assets and liabilities recorded for temporary differences between the timing of when certain transactions are recognized for financial and income tax reporting.

•Federal universal service fund (“USF”) contributions – In 2004 and 2003, Universal Service Administrative Company (“USAC”) billings to U.S. Cellular for USF contributions were based on estimated revenues reported to USAC by U.S. Cellular in accordance with USAC’s established procedures. However, U.S. Cellular’s actual liability for USF is based upon its actual revenues and USAC’s established procedures provide a method to adjust U.S. Cellular’s estimated liability to its actual liability. In the first six months of 2005 and the full years of 2004 and 2003, U.S. Cellular’s actual revenues exceeded estimated revenues reported to USAC on an interim basis. As a result, additional amounts were due to USAC in 2005 and 2004 based on U.S. Cellular’s annual report filings. Such additional amounts were incorrectly expensed when the invoices were received from USAC rather than at the time the obligation was incurred. In the third quarter of 2005, U.S. Cellular corrected its accounting for USF contributions to record expense reflecting the estimated obligation incurred based on actual revenues reported during the period. Accordingly, in the restatement, TDS has adjusted previously reported USF contributions expense by U.S. Cellular to reflect the estimated liability incurred during the period.

•Customer contract termination fees – In the fourth quarter of 2003, U.S. Cellular revised its business practices related to the billing of contract termination fees charged when a customer disconnected service prior to the end of the customer’s contract. This change resulted in an increase in amounts billed to customers and revenues even though a high percentage of the amounts billed were deemed uncollectible. At the time of the change in business practice, U.S. Cellular incorrectly recorded revenues related to such fees at the time of billing, as generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) would preclude revenue recognition if the receivable is not reasonably assured of collection. In the first quarter of 2005, U.S. Cellular corrected its accounting to record revenues related to such fees only upon collection, in recognition of the fact that the collectibility of the revenues was not reasonably assured at the time of billing. In the restatement, TDS made adjustments to properly reflect U.S. Cellular’s revenues for such fees upon collection beginning on October 1, 2003.

1

•Leases and contracts – TDS and U.S. Cellular had entered into certain operating leases (as both lessee and lessor) that provide for specific scheduled increases in payments over the lease term. In the third quarter of 2004, TDS made adjustments for the cumulative effect which were not considered to be material to either that quarter or to prior periods to correct its accounting and to recognize revenues and expenses under such agreements on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 13, “Accounting for Leases,” as amended, and related pronouncements. In addition, the accounting for certain other long-term contracts, for which a cumulative effect adjustment was made in the first quarter of 2005, was corrected to recognize expenses in the appropriate periods. The restatement adjustments reverse the cumulative amounts previously recorded in the third quarter of 2004 and the first quarter of 2005, and properly record such revenues and expenses on a straight-line basis in the appropriate periods.

•Promotion rebates – From time to time, U.S. Cellular’s sales promotions include rebates on sales of handsets to customers. In such cases, U.S. Cellular reduces revenues and records a liability at the time of sale reflecting an estimate of rebates to be paid under the promotion. Previously, the accrued liability was not adjusted on a timely basis upon expiration of the promotion to reflect the actual amount of rebates paid based upon information available at the date the financial statements were issued. In the restatement, TDS has corrected revenues and accrued liabilities to reflect the impacts associated with promotion rebates in the appropriate periods.

•Operations of consolidated partnerships managed by a third party – Historically, U.S. Cellular recorded the results of operations of certain consolidated partnerships managed by a third party on an estimated basis, and adjusted such estimated results to the actual results upon receipt of financial statements in the following quarter. However, GAAP requires that the actual amounts be used. In the restatement, TDS has corrected its financial statements to recognize results of operations in the appropriate period based on the partnerships’ actual results of operations reported for such periods.

•Investment income from entities accounted for by the equity method – Historically, U.S. Cellular recorded an estimate each quarter of its proportionate share of net income (loss) from certain entities accounted for by the equity method, and adjusted such estimate to the actual share of net income (loss) upon receipt of financial statements in the following quarter. However, GAAP requires that the actual amounts be used. In the restatement, TDS has corrected its financial statements to recognize investment income in the appropriate period based on the entities’ actual net income (loss) reported for such periods.

•      Historically, TDS had not fully consolidated its 80%-owned subsidiary, Suttle Straus, to present the operating results of such subsidiary in revenues, cost of service, selling, general and administrative expenses and depreciation. Previously, the net operating results of the subsidiary were included in other income (expense).  However, the non-operating portion of the income statement of Suttle Straus was properly presented. The restatement correctly consolidated the results of Suttle Straus. Also, property, plant and equipment was corrected to properly include Suttle Straus’ fixed assets.  Previously, the balances were included in other assets and deferred charges. In addition, certain intercompany elimination entries between TDS, U.S. Cellular, TDS Telecom and Suttle Straus have been recorded.

•Revenue and cost of service accruals – TDS Telecom reviewed accruals in the first and second quarter of 2004 and determined that an adjustment was required to record unbilled revenue related to its competitive local exchange carrier that were not previously recorded. TDS Telecom also reduced cost of service accruals related to long-distance service as a result of shifting long-distance traffic to a second provider. In the restatement, the adjustments reverse the cumulative amounts previously recorded in the first and second quarters of 2004, and record such revenues and expenses in the appropriate periods.

•      Consolidated statements of cash flows – In the restatement, the classification of cash distributions received from unconsolidated entities has been corrected to properly reflect cash received, which represents a return on investment in the unconsolidated entities, as cash flows from operating activities; previously, the cash received on such investments was classified as cash flows from investing activities. Also, the classification of certain noncash stock-based compensation expense has been corrected to properly reflect such noncash expense as an adjustment to cash flows from operating activities; previously, such expense was classified as cash flows from financing activities.

•Interest income – In the restatement, TDS corrected its accounting for recording interest income earned by its subsidiaries through a cash management agreement for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002. TDS subsidiaries participating in the cash management agreement had not recorded an accrual to increase cash and interest income for their portion of the interest income earned. The correcting entries increased cash and interest income for each period presented.

•Other items – In addition to the adjustments described above, TDS recorded a number of other adjustments to correct and record revenues and expenses in the periods in which such revenues and expenses were earned or incurred. These adjustments were not significant, either individually or in aggregate.

2

The table below summarizes the impact on income from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest as a result of the restatement.

										Prior to
	2004			2003			2002			2002
	(Increase (decrease) dollars in thousands)
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes and Minority Interest, as previously reported	$	149,346		$	130,736		$	(1,555,669	)
Federal universal service fund contributions	2,973			(4,620		)	—			$	—
Customer contract termination fees	(599		)	(2,992		)	—			—
Leases and contracts	3,974			(2,878		)	(1,223		)	(2,553		)
Promotion rebates	1,027			—			—			—
Operations of consolidated partnerships managed by a third party	1,183			(245		)	(539		)	(147		)
Investment income from entities accounted for by the equity method	(3,368		)	(975		)	124			(2,352		)
Revenue and cost of service accruals	(5,702		)	3,466			564			1,672
Interest income	1,098			274			380			632
Other items	(1,319		)	(1,006		)	(291		)	(1,385		)
Total adjustment	(733		)	(8,976		)	(985		)	$	(4,133	)
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes and Minority Interest, as restated	$	148,613		$	121,760		$	(1,556,654	)

The table below summarizes the impact on net income and earnings per share as a result of the restatement.

	2004						2003						2002						Prior to 2002
	Net Income (loss)			Diluted Earnings Per Share			Net Income (loss)			Diluted Earnings Per Share			Net Income (loss)			Diluted Earnings Per Share			Net Income (loss)
	(Increase (decrease) dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
As previously reported	$	49,004		$	0.84		$	46,608		$	0.79		$	(994,772	)	$	(16.97	)
Federal universal service fund contributions	1,325			0.02			(2,072		)	(0.04		)	—			—			$	—
Customer contract termination fees	(279		)	—			(1,374		)	(0.02		)	—			—			—
Leases and contracts	2,172			0.04			(1,467		)	(0.03		)	(635		)	(0.01		)	(1,390		)
Promotion rebates	479			0.01			—			—			—			—			—
Operations of consolidated partnerships managed by a third party	430			—			(90		)	—			(192		)	—			(57		)
Investment income from entities accounted for by the equity method	(1,672		)	(0.03		)	(485		)	(0.01		)	62			—			(1,173		)
Revenue and cost of service accruals	(3,449		)	(0.06		)	2,097			0.04			342			—			1,012
Income taxes	18,921			0.33			(10,686		)	(0.18		)	35,051			0.60			(26,939		)
Interest income	664			0.01			165			—			230			—			383
Other items	(743		)	(0.01		)	(575		)	(0.01		)	(170		)	—			(1,169		)
Total adjustment	17,848			0.31			(14,487		)	(0.25		)	34,688			0.59			$	(29,333	)
As restated	$	66,852		$	1.15		$	32,121		$	0.54		$	(960,084	)	$	(16.38	)

3

The table below summarizes the effects of consolidating Suttle Straus and recording certain intercompany eliminations as previously discussed.

Year Ended December 31,	2004						2003						2002
	Adjustment for Suttle Straus			Intercompany Eliminations			Adjustment for Suttle Straus			Intercompany Eliminations			Adjustment for Suttle Straus			Intercompany Eliminations
	(Increase (decrease) dollars in thousands)
Operating Revenues	$	27,269		$	(11,695	)	$	26,745		$	(12,313	)	$	24,136		$	(11,994	)
Operating Expenses
Cost of services and products	18,044			939			17,870			311			16,111			—
Selling, general and administrative	5,110			(12,634		)	4,859			(12,624		)	4,877			(11,994		)
Depreciation, amortization and accretion	2,515			—			2,438			—			2,045			—
Total Operating Expenses	25,669			(11,695		)	25,167			(12,313		)	23,033			(11,994		)
Operating Income	1,600			—			1,578			—			1,103			—
Other income (expense), net	(1,600		)	—			(1,578		)	—			(1,103		)	—
Investment and Other Income (Expense)	(1,600		)	—			(1,578		)	—			(1,103		)	—
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operation Before Income Taxes and Minority Interest	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—

4

OVERVIEW

The following is a summary of certain selected information from the complete management discussion that follows the overview and does not contain all of the information that may be important. You should carefully read this entire Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and not rely solely on the overview.

U.S. Cellular – U.S. Cellular positions itself as a regional operator, focusing its efforts on providing wireless service to customers in the geographic areas where it has licenses to provide such service. U.S. Cellular differentiates itself from its competitors through a customer satisfaction strategy, reflecting a customer service focus and a high-quality wireless network.

U.S. Cellular’s business development strategy is to purchase controlling interests in wireless licenses in areas adjacent to or in proximity to its other wireless licenses, thereby building contiguous operating market areas. Its largest contiguous service area is in the Midwest/Southwest, where it serves 3.0 million customers and has licenses covering a total population of more than 31 million. U.S. Cellular’s operating strategy is to strengthen the geographic areas where it can continue to build long-term operating synergies and to exit those areas where it does not have opportunities to build such synergies. U.S. Cellular’s most recently completed transactions are summarized below.

•Carroll Wireless, L.P. (“Carroll Wireless”), an entity in which U.S. Cellular is a limited partner, was a successful bidder for 17 licensed areas in the auction of wireless spectrum designated by the FCC as Auction 58, which ended on February 15, 2005. These 17 licensed areas cover portions of 11 states and are in markets which are either adjacent to or overlap current U.S. Cellular licensed areas.

•On December 20, 2004, U.S. Cellular completed the sale of the Daytona Beach, Florida 20 megahertz C block personal communication service license to MetroPCS California/Florida, Inc. (“MetroPCS”) for $8.5 million.

•On November 30, 2004, U.S. Cellular completed the sale of certain wireless properties to ALLTEL Communications, Inc. (“ALLTEL”) for $80.2 million in cash, subject to a working capital adjustment. The properties sold included two consolidated operating markets and five minority interests.

•On February 18, 2004, U.S. Cellular completed the sale of certain wireless properties in southern Texas to AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. (“AT&T Wireless”), now a subsidiary of Cingular Wireless LLC (“Cingular”), for $96.5 million in cash.

•On August 1, 2003, U.S. Cellular completed the transfer of properties to AT&T Wireless and the assignments to it by AT&T Wireless of a portion of the wireless licenses covered by the agreement with AT&T Wireless. On the initial closing date, U.S. Cellular transferred wireless assets and customers in 10 markets in Florida and Georgia to AT&T Wireless. In return, U.S. Cellular received approximately $34 million in cash and minority interests in six wireless markets in which it owns a controlling interest.

In addition to the cash and minority interests, U.S. Cellular will have received a total of 36 wireless licenses in 13 states when the transaction is fully consummated. U.S. Cellular has deferred the assignment and development of 21 of these licenses it has the right to acquire from AT&T Wireless for up to five years from August 1, 2003.

U.S. Cellular launched service in Lincoln, Nebraska; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; and Portland, Maine in 2004. Licenses for these markets were acquired as part of the 2003 transaction with AT&T Wireless.

•On August 7, 2002, U.S. Cellular completed the acquisition of the “Chicago market,” a 20 megahertz license in the Chicago major trading area (excluding Kenosha, Wisconsin) for $617.8 million.

U.S. Cellular operating income increased 69% in 2004 and decreased 61% in 2003. The increase in 2004 primarily reflected increased revenues and gains on assets held for sale and the absence of losses on impairments and assets held for sale compared to 2003. The increase in 2004 was offset by increased expenses related to the launch of new markets, decreased operating income due to divestitures of markets, increased equipment subsidies and increased depreciation expense. The decrease in 2003 was primarily due to expenses related to increased customer usage along with development of new markets. U.S. Cellular’s operating income was significantly affected by the loss on assets held for sale and loss on impairment of intangible assets in 2003. The operating income margins (as a percent of service revenues) were 7.0% in 2004, 4.5% in 2003 and 13.3% in 2002.

Although operating margins improved in 2004, TDS anticipates that there will be continued pressure on U.S. Cellular operating income and margins in the next few years related to the following factors:

•costs of customer acquisition and retention;

•competition;

•increased customer use of U.S. Cellular’s services;

•launching service in new areas;

•reduced inbound roaming revenues; and

•continued enhancements to U.S. Cellular’s wireless network.

The effects of these factors are expected to be mitigated to some extent by the following factors:

•reduced customer usage costs per minute and outbound roaming costs per minute; and

•expansion of revenues from data-related services and newly launched markets.

In the exchange and divestiture transactions listed above, U.S. Cellular has divested operations that were generating revenues, cash flows from operations and operating income. However, a significant portion of such revenues, cash flows from operations and operating income was attributable to inbound roaming traffic and was not primarily generated by U.S. Cellular’s customers in those markets. In exchange, U.S. Cellular received cash and received or will receive licenses that will be in a development phase for several years. U.S. Cellular uses cash proceeds from these transactions to help defray costs related to building out new markets. U.S. Cellular anticipates that it may require debt or equity financing over the next few years for capital expenditures, for the development of these new markets and to further its growth in recently launched markets.

See “Results of Operations – Wireless Telephone Operations.”

5

TDS Telecom – TDS Telecom provides high-quality telecommunication services, including full-service local exchange service, long distance telephone service, and Internet access, to rural and suburban communities. TDS Telecom’s business plan is designed for a full-service telecommunications company, including competitive local exchange carrier operations, by leveraging TDS Telecom’s strength as an incumbent local exchange carrier. TDS Telecom is focused on achieving three central strategic objectives: growth, market leadership, and profitability. TDS Telecom’s strategy includes gaining additional market share and deepening penetration of vertical services within established markets. The strategy places primary emphasis on small- and medium-sized commercial customers and residential customers.

Both incumbent local exchange carriers and competitive local exchange carriers are faced with significant challenges, including the industry decline in use of second lines by customers, growing competition from wireless and other wireline providers, changes in regulation, new technologies such as Voice over Internet Protocol, and the uncertainty in the economy. These challenges could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of TDS Telecom.

TDS Telecom was able to increase customers and revenues in 2004 and 2003. By penetrating into existing markets, TDS Telecom’s competitive local exchange carrier equivalent access lines increased 17% and 25% in 2004 and 2003, respectively, which led to 6% and 21% increases in revenues. TDS Telecom’s incumbent local exchange carrier increased revenues slightly in both years through sales of vertical services such as long distance and DSL services to existing customers. TDS Telecom has also managed to remain profitable by continually seeking ways to control costs. Operating margins were 4% and 18% in 2004 and 2003, respectively. The significant decline in operating margin was a result of losses on impairment of long-lived assets and intangible assets of the competitive local exchange carrier operations. In 2004, TDS Telecom recorded a loss on impairment of long-lived assets of $87.9 million and a loss on impairment of intangible assets of $29.4 million in the Statement of Operations associated with the competitive local exchange carrier operations.

On November 30, 2004, TDS Telecom completed the sale of certain wireless properties to ALLTEL for $62.7 million in cash, subject to a working capital adjustment. The properties sold included a majority interest in one market and an investment interest in one market.

See “Results of Operations – Wireline Telephone Operations.”

Financing Initiatives – TDS and its subsidiaries had cash and cash equivalents totaling $1,171.1 million, $1,266.4 million of revolving credit facilities and an additional $75.0 million of bank lines of credit as of December 31, 2004. TDS and its subsidiaries are also generating substantial internal funds from operations. Cash flow from continuing operating activities totaled $797.4 million in 2004, $971.0 million in 2003 and $827.6 million in 2002. In addition, TDS currently has access to public and private capital markets to help meet its long-term financing needs. TDS anticipates that it may require funding over the next few years for capital expenditures and for the development of new wireless markets at U.S. Cellular. Management believes that cash on hand, expected future cash flows from operations and existing sources of external financing provide substantial financial flexibility and are sufficient to permit TDS and its subsidiaries to finance its contractual obligations and anticipated capital expenditures.

TDS is committed to maintaining a strong Balance Sheet and its investment grade rating. During 2004, 2003 and 2002, TDS entered into several financing transactions that have provided financial flexibility as it continues to grow its wireless and wireline businesses:

2004

•U.S. Cellular sold $330 million of 30-year, 7.5% senior notes and $100 million of 30-year, 6.7% senior notes, the proceeds of which were used to redeem $250 million of 7.25% senior notes and $163.3 million of 6% zero coupon convertible redeemable debentures (also known as Liquid Yield Option Notes).

•TDS and U.S. Cellular extended the maturity date of their respective revolving credit facilities to December 2009.

•TDS repurchased 214,800 of its Common Shares and U.S. Cellular repurchased 91,700 of its Common Shares.

2003

•TDS redeemed $300 million of its Trust Originated Preferred Securities.

•U.S. Cellular sold $444 million of 30-year, 6.7% senior notes.

•U.S. Cellular increased the capacity of its revolving credit facility entered into in 2002 from $325 million to $700 million, and canceled its $500 million revolving credit facility.

•TDS redeemed medium-term notes of $70.5 million.

•TDS repurchased 1,961,000 of its Common Shares.

2002

•TDS and U.S. Cellular monetized their investments in marketable equity securities through variable prepaid forward contracts (“forward contracts”) which mature in 2007 and 2008, receiving $1.6 billion of cash.

•U.S. Cellular sold $130 million of 30-year, 8.75% senior notes.

•U.S. Cellular established a five-year, $325 million revolving credit facility with a series of banks.

•TDS redeemed medium-term notes of $51.0 million.

See “Financial Resources” and “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Operating Revenues increased $248.7 million, or 7%, to $3,703.9 million in 2004 from $3,455.2 million in 2003, and increased $442.7 million, or 15%, in 2003 from $3,012.5 million in 2002 reflecting growth in wireless customers. U.S. Cellular operating revenues increased $230.4 million, or 9%, to $2,808.2 million in 2004 from $2,577.8 million in 2003, and increased $378.9 million, or 17%, in 2003 from $2,198.9 million in 2002. Revenue growth primarily reflects wireless customer growth of 12% in 2004 and 7% in 2003 including the divestitures of 91,000 and 141,000 customers in 2004 and 2003, respectively. TDS Telecom operating revenues increased $17.1 million, or 2%, to $880.1 million in 2004 from $863.0 million in 2003, and increased $61.5 million, or 8%, in 2003 from $801.5 million in 2002. Wireline equivalent access lines increased by 6% in 2004 and 8% in 2003. The majority of growth in equivalent access lines in both years occurred at TDS Telecom’s competitive local exchange operations.

Operating Expenses increased $288.3 million, or 9%, to $3,481.9 million in 2004 from $3,193.6 million in 2003, and increased $567.3 million, or 22%, in 2003 from $2,626.3 million in 2002. U.S. Cellular operating expenses increased $155.9 million, or 6%, to $2,624.9 million in 2004 from $2,469.0 million in 2003, and increased $549.9 million, or 29%, in 2003 from $1,919.1 million in 2002 due primarily to the costs associated with providing service to an expanding customer base, additional depreciation expense and launching new markets and acquisitions. Also included in U.S. Cellular’s operating expenses in 2003 is $45.9 million of losses on assets of operations held for sale and $49.6 million of losses on impairment of intangible assets.

6

TDS Telecom operating expenses increased $131.4 million, or 18%, to $843.1 million in 2004 from $711.7 million in 2003, and increased $15.6 million, or 2%, in 2003 from $696.1 million in 2002. The increase in 2004 was primarily caused by an $87.9 million loss on the impairment of long-lived assets and a $29.4 million loss on the impairment of intangible assets. These impairments resulted from the write-off of property, plant and equipment, and goodwill at the competitive local exchange carrier business. The increase in 2003 was primarily caused by increased cost of services and products at the incumbent local exchange carrier, offset somewhat by a decline in competitive local exchange carrier costs. Also included in TDS Telecom’s operating expenses in 2003 was $5.0 million of losses on impairment of long-lived assets. Of this amount, $4.6 million was at the competitive local exchange carriers and $0.4 million was at the incumbent local exchange carriers.

Operating Income decreased $39.6 million, or 15%, to $222.0 million in 2004 from $261.6 million in 2003, and decreased $124.7 million, or 32%, in 2003 from $386.3 million in 2002. U.S. Cellular’s operating income increased $74.6 million, or 69%, to $183.3 million in 2004 from $108.7 million in 2003, and decreased $171.1 million, or 61%, in 2003 from $279.8 million in 2002. The increase in 2004 primarily reflected increased revenues and gains on assets held for sale and the absence of losses on impairments and assets held for sale compared to 2003. The increase in 2004 was offset by increased expenses related to the launch of new markets, decreased operating income due to divestitures of markets, increased equipment subsidies and increased depreciation expense. The decline in 2003 reflects the costs associated with the acquisition of the Chicago market and increased marketing and depreciation expenses. U.S. Cellular’s 2003 operating income was significantly affected by the $45.9 million loss on assets held for sale and the $49.6 million loss on impairment of intangible assets. TDS Telecom’s operating income decreased $114.2 million, or 75%, to $37.1 million in 2004 from $151.3 million in 2003, and increased $45.9 million, or 44%, in 2003 from $105.4 million in 2002. The decrease in 2004 primarily reflects the competitive local exchange carrier losses on the impairment of long-lived assets of $87.9 million and goodwill of $29.4 million. The increase in 2003 reflects improved operating results from the competitive local exchange carrier business.

Investment and other income (expense) primarily includes interest and dividend income, investment income, gain (loss) on investments and interest expense.

Investment income, TDS’s share of income in unconsolidated entities in which it has a minority interest, totaled $64.9 million in 2004, $52.2 million in 2003 and $43.8 million in 2002. TDS follows the equity method of accounting when its ownership interest of unconsolidated entities equals or exceeds 20% for corporations and 3% to 5% for partnerships and limited liability companies. Under the equity method, TDS recognizes its proportionate share of the income and losses accruing to it under the terms of partnership or shareholder agreements. The aggregate net income of these investment markets increased significantly in 2004 and 2003, resulting in the corresponding increases in investment income.

Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership meets certain tests, pursuant to Rule 3-09 of SEC Regulation S-X, contributing $41.8 million, $29.9 million and $21.9 million to investment income in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Interest and dividend income increased $8.7 million, or 43%, to $28.8 million in 2004 from $20.1 million in 2003, and decreased $37.6 million, or 65%, in 2003 from $57.7 million in 2002.

Interest income increased $4.1 million in 2004. U.S. Cellular earned $3.8 million of interest income on a tax refund claim. Dividend income increased $4.6 million partially caused by a $2.9 million increase in dividend income on shares owned of Vodafone Group Plc (“Vodafone”).

The 2003 decrease was due primarily to a $45.3 million Deutsche Telekom common share dividend TDS received in 2002. Deutsche Telekom has not paid a dividend since 2002. Deutsche Telekom anticipates paying a dividend in 2005 in the range of EUR 0.56 to EUR 0.62 per share, subject to shareholder approval. Using the exchange rate of $1.27 per EUR, TDS anticipates recording dividend income in the range of $93 million to $104 million, before taxes, upon approval from Deutsche Telekom shareholders. See “Financial Resources – Cash Flows from Continuing Financing Activities” for a discussion of proceeds from the monetization activities.

Gain (loss) on investments. TDS recorded a gain of $38.2 million in 2004, and losses of $10.2 million in 2003 and $1,888.4 million in 2002.

In 2004, TDS recorded a $40.8 million gain on the sale of investment interests to ALLTEL. TDS recorded a $1.8 million loss to reflect an impairment in the carrying value of U.S. Cellular’s investment in the Daytona license sold to MetroPCS and a $0.3 million loss associated with buying out the partner in the Daytona investment. TDS also recorded a $0.5 million loss on an investment in a telephone company accounted for using the cost method.

In 2003, TDS recorded a $5.0 million impairment loss on a wireless investment held by TDS Telecom. Also in 2003, a $3.5 million license impairment loss was recorded related to U.S. Cellular’s investment in the Daytona license. U.S. Cellular also recorded a $1.7 million impairment loss related to a minority investment in a wireless market that is accounted for using the cost method.

TDS and its subsidiaries hold a substantial amount of marketable equity securities that are publicly traded and can have volatile share prices. TDS and its subsidiaries do not make direct investments in publicly traded companies and all of these interests were acquired as a result of sales, exchanges or reorganizations of other assets. TDS continues to hold these investments in part because their associated low tax cost basis would trigger a substantial taxable gain upon disposition. “See Liquidity and Capital Resources – Marketable Equity Securities and Forward Contracts” for a discussion on marketable equity securities.

In 2002, management determined that the decline in value of marketable equity securities relative to their cost basis was other than temporary and charged a $1,757.5 million loss to the Statement of Operations. TDS has subsequently utilized derivative financial instruments to eliminate the risk of recording any further other-than-temporary losses. See “Market Risk – Marketable Equity Securities and Derivatives” for a discussion of other-than-temporary losses.

7

TDS had notes receivable from Airadigm Communications, Inc. (“Airadigm”) and Kington Management Corporation (“Kington”) aggregating $100.6 million relating to the funding of Airadigm’s operations and the purchase by Kington of certain of U.S. Cellular’s minority interests in 2000. The values of the notes were directly related to the values of certain assets and contractual rights of Airadigm and the value of the minority wireless market interests. As a result of changes in business strategies and other events, a review of the Airadigm business plan and a review of the wireless markets, management concluded that the notes receivable were impaired. Accordingly, TDS recorded a loss of $94.0 million in 2002 to establish a valuation allowance for the Airadigm notes receivable, to write down the Kington notes receivable and to write off of certain capitalized costs.

TDS recorded additional losses in 2002 of $25.4 million related to the withdrawal from a partnership in which it had owned an investment interest, $7.3 million related to the write-down of a wireless investment to fair value and $4.2 million related to the reduction in value of a land purchase option.

Interest Expense increased $27.3 million, or 16%, to $198.7 million in 2004 from $171.4 million in 2003, and increased $39.2 million, or 30%, in 2003 from $132.2 million in 2002.

The increase in interest expense in 2004 was primarily due to new debt issuances in 2004 and 2003. U.S. Cellular issued 30-year 6.7% senior notes in June 2004 and December 2003 ($31.7 million) and issued 30-year 7.5% senior notes in June 2004 ($13.5 million). The increase in interest expense in 2004 was offset by the redemption of U.S. Cellular’s 7.25% senior notes in August 2004 ($6.9 million) and the redemption of U.S. Cellular’s Liquid Yield Option Notes in July 2004 ($3.6 million).

The increase in 2003 was primarily due to amounts related to forward contracts ($31.7 million), the issuance of 30-year, 8.75% senior notes ($9.6 million) by U.S. Cellular in 2002 and an increase in average short-term debt balances and related interest expense ($4.0 million). The increase in interest expense in 2003 was offset by the retirement of 9% Series A notes in December 2002 ($4.6 million) and the $70.5 million reduction in medium-term notes ($2.5 million) in 2003.  See Note 15 – Long-Term Debt and Note 16 – Financial Instruments and Derivatives, for an explanation of the forward contracts and other long-term debt instruments.

Minority Interest in Income of Subsidiary Trust In September 2003, TDS redeemed all $300 million of Company-Obligated Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Securities at par plus accrued and unpaid distributions. There was no gain or loss on this transaction. Interest recorded on these securities totaled $16.7 million in 2003 and $24.8 million in 2002.

Other income (expense), net increased $7.3 million to $(6.6) million in 2004 from $(13.9) million in 2003, and decreased $14.9 million in 2003 from $1.0 million in 2002. The increase in 2004 reflects a $5.8 million increase in the gain on the VeriSign derivative. The decrease in 2003 was primarily due to the write-off of $9.0 million of deferred debt expenses related to the $300 million of Company-Obligated Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Securities and $70.5 million of medium-term notes that were redeemed in 2003. TDS also incurred $7.3 million of costs related to the prepaid forward contracts and a $3.5 million loss related to derivative accounting on the VeriSign investment in 2003.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit) was an expense of $59.3 million in 2004, an expense of $58.3 million in 2003 and a benefit of $(611.2) million in 2002. The corresponding effective tax rates were 39.9% in 2004, 47.8% in 2003 and (39.3%) in 2002.

Income from continuing operations for each of the three years ended December 31, 2004, includes gains and losses (reported in the captions gain (loss) on investments, loss on impairment of long-lived assets, loss on impairment of intangible assets, and (gain) loss on assets held for sale in the Statement of Operations).

2004

•Tax expense of $37.0 million was recorded on the gain from the sale of assets to ALLTEL and to AT&T Wireless.

•Tax benefit of $27.9 million was recorded on the loss on impairment of competitive local exchange carrier assets.

•Tax benefits of $0.9 million were recorded on impairments of assets.

2003

•Tax benefits of $19.2 million were recorded on loss on assets of U.S. Cellular operations held for sale.

•Tax benefit of $19.4 million was recorded on loss on impairment of U.S. Cellular intangible assets.

•Tax benefit of $1.9 million was recorded on loss on impairment of TDS Telecom assets.

•Tax benefit of $1.6 million was recorded on loss on U.S. Cellular investments.

2002

•Tax benefit of $736.0 million was recorded on investments in marketable equity securities as a result of management’s determination that unrealized losses with respect to the investments were other than temporary.

The effective income tax rate excluding the items listed above was 23.6% in 2004, 43.2% in 2003 and 37.6% in 2002. The 2004 effective tax rate on operations excluding losses and gains is lower than 2003 due to favorable settlement of several tax issues in 2004. During 2004, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) substantially completed its audit of TDS’s federal income tax returns for the years 1997 - 2001 and TDS’s claims for research tax credits for the years 1995  — 2001. Primarily based on the results of the audit, TDS reduced its accrual for audit contingencies by $21.4 million in 2004. Also in 2004, TDS recorded a $6.3 million benefit for the research tax credits that were allowed in the federal income tax audit. See Note 2 – Income Taxes in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the effective tax rates.

Minority Share of Income includes the minority public shareholders’ share of U.S. Cellular’s net income, the minority shareholders’ or partners’ share of certain U.S. Cellular subsidiaries’ net income or loss and other TDS minority interests.

In 2004, U.S. Cellular’s minority public shareholders’ share of U.S. Cellular’s net income increased $2.6 million due to U.S. Cellular’s gains on the sale of assets to ALLTEL. In 2003, U.S. Cellular’s minority public shareholders’ share of U.S. Cellular’s net income was reduced by $10.7 million due to U.S. Cellular’s loss on impairment of intangible assets and loss on assets held for sale. In 2002, U.S. Cellular’s minority public shareholders’ share of U.S. Cellular’s net income was reduced by $32.7 million due to U.S. Cellular’s loss on investments.

Year Ended December 31,	2004 (as restated)			2003 (as restated)			2002 (as restated)
(Dollars in thousands)
Minority Share of Income
U.S. Cellular
Minority Public Shareholders’ Interest	$	(19,673	)	$	(8,532	)	$	4,587
Subsidiaries’ Minority Interests	(9,108		)	(9,307		)	(12,101		)
	(28,781		)	(17,839		)	(7,514		)
Other Subsidiaries	(91		)	(140		)	(64		)
	$	(28,872	)	$	(17,979	)	$	(7,578	)

8

Discontinued Operations. TDS is party to an indemnity agreement with T-Mobile USA, Inc. regarding certain contingent liabilities for Aerial Communications, Inc. (“Aerial”), a former subsidiary of TDS. TDS has recorded an accrual for expenses, primarily tax related, resulting from Aerial’s merger into VoiceStream Wireless Corporation (“VoiceStream”) in 2000.

In 2004, TDS reduced the accrued indemnity and recorded gains on discontinued operations totaling $10.2 million ($6.4 million, net of an income tax expense of $3.8 million), or $0.11 per diluted share. The accrual was reduced due to favorable outcomes of federal and state tax audits, which reduced TDS’s indemnity requirements.

In 2003, TDS recorded a loss of $2.8 million ($1.6 million, net of an income tax benefit of $1.2 million), or $(0.03) per diluted share for discontinued operations for additional Aerial-related accrued liabilities.

Cumulative Effect of Accounting Changes. Effective January 1, 2003, TDS adopted SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” and recorded the initial liability for legal obligations associated with an asset retirement. The cumulative effect of the implementation of this accounting standard on periods prior to 2003 was recorded in the first quarter of 2003, decreasing net income by $11.8 million, net of income taxes of $9.7 million and minority interest of $3.0 million, or $0.20 per diluted share.

Effective January 1, 2002, TDS adopted SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” and determined that wireless licenses have indefinite lives.  Upon initial adoption, TDS reviewed its investments in licenses and determined there was an impairment loss on certain licenses.  The cumulative effect of the initial impairment upon the adoption of SFAS No. 142 reduced net income in 2002 by $10.4 million, net of income taxes of $8.2 million and minority interest of $2.3 million, or $0.18 per diluted share.

Effective January 1, 2002, U.S. Cellular began deferring expense recognition of a portion of commission expenses in the amount of deferred activation fee revenues. The cumulative effect of this accounting change on periods prior to 2002 was recorded in 2002, increasing net income by $3.4 million, net of income taxes of $3.0 million and minority interest of $1.2 million, or $0.06 per diluted share.

Net Income (Loss) Available to Common totaled $66.6 million, or $1.15 per diluted share, in 2004 compared to $31.7 million, or $0.54 per diluted share, in 2003 and $(960.5) million, or $(16.38) per diluted share, in 2002. Amounts in 2002 were significantly affected by losses from investments.

WIRELESS TELEPHONE OPERATIONS

TDS provides wireless telephone service through United States Cellular Corporation (“U.S. Cellular”), an 82.0%-owned subsidiary. U.S. Cellular owns, manages and invests in wireless markets throughout the United States. Growth in the customer base is the primary reason for the change in U.S. Cellular’s results of operations in 2004 and 2003. The number of customers increased 12% to 4,945,000 at December 31, 2004, and increased 7% to 4,409,000 at December 31, 2003, from 4,103,000 at December 31, 2002. In 2004, U.S. Cellular added 627,000 net new customers from its marketing efforts and transferred a total of 91,000 customers in two transactions. In February 2004, 58,000 customers in southern Texas were transferred to AT&T Wireless and in November 2004, 33,000 customers in Ohio and Florida were transferred to ALLTEL. In 2003, U.S. Cellular added 447,000 net new customers from its marketing efforts and transferred 141,000 customers in 10 markets in Florida and Georgia to AT&T Wireless in exchange for wireless licenses. See “Acquisitions, Exchanges and Divestitures” for a discussion of these transactions.

U.S. Cellular owned, or had the right to acquire pursuant to certain agreements, either majority or minority interests in 151 cellular markets and 69 personal communication service markets at December 31, 2004. A summary of the number of markets U.S. Cellular owns or has rights to acquire as of December 31, 2004, follows:

	Number of Markets
Consolidated markets (1)	175
Consolidated markets to be acquired pursuant to existing agreements (2)	21
Minority interests accounted for using equity method (3)	19
Minority interests accounted for using cost method (4)	5
Total markets to be owned after completion of pending transactions	220

(1)U.S. Cellular owns a controlling interest in each of these markets.

(2)U.S. Cellular owns rights to acquire controlling interests in 21 additional wireless licenses, 20 of which result from an acquisition agreement with AT&T Wireless, now Cingular, which closed in August 2003. U.S. Cellular has up to five years from the transaction closing date to exercise its rights to acquire the licenses. In a separate agreement, U.S. Cellular agreed to purchase a controlling interest in one license from Cingular.

(3)Represents licenses in which U.S. Cellular owns an interest that is not a controlling financial interest and which are accounted for using the equity method.

(4)Represents licenses in which U.S. Cellular owns an interest that is not a controlling financial interest and which are accounted for using the cost method.

Following are tables of summarized operating data for U.S. Cellular’s consolidated operations:

December 31, (1a)	2004		2003		2002
Total market population (2)	44,391,000		46,267,000		41,048,000
Customers (3)	4,945,000		4,409,000		4,103,000
Market penetration (4)	11.14	%	9.53	%	10.00	%
Total full-time equivalent employees	6,725		6,225		6,100
Cell sites in service	4,856		4,184		3,914

For the Year Ended December 31, (1b)	2004			2003			2002
	(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)
Average monthly service revenue per customer (5)	$	46.61		$	47.29		$	47.28
Postpay churn rate per month (6)	1.5		%	1.5		%	1.8		%
Sales and marketing cost per gross customer addition (7)	$	403		$	380		$	365

(1a) Amounts in 2004 (i) do not include the two markets sold to ALLTEL in November 2004; (ii) do not include the six markets sold to AT&T Wireless in February 2004; (iii) do not include the 10 markets transferred to AT&T Wireless in August 2003; and (iv) include the 15 markets acquired and transferred from AT&T Wireless in August 2003. Amounts in 2003 (i) include the two markets sold to ALLTEL in November 2004; (ii) include the six markets sold to AT&T Wireless in February 2004; (iii) do not include the 10 markets transferred to AT&T Wireless in August 2003; and (iv) include the 15 markets acquired and transferred from AT&T Wireless in August 2003. Amounts in 2002 include the results from the Chicago market acquired in August 2002.

(1b)Amounts in 2004 (i) include the results of the two markets sold to ALLTEL through November 30, 2004; (ii) include the results of the six markets sold to AT&T Wireless through February 17, 2004; (iii) do not include the results of the 10 markets transferred to AT&T Wireless in August 2003 for the entire period; and (iv) include the development and operating activities of the 15 markets acquired and transferred from AT&T Wireless in August 2003 for the entire period. Amounts in 2003 (i) include the results of the two markets sold to ALLTEL in November 2004 for the entire period; (ii) include the results of the six markets sold to AT&T Wireless in February 2004 for the entire period; (iii) include the results of the 10 markets transferred to AT&T Wireless through July 31, 2003; and (iv) include the development and acquisition activities of the 15 markets acquired and transferred from AT&T Wireless from the transfer date of August 1, 2003 to December 31, 2003. Amounts in 2002 include the operations of the Chicago market from August 7 through December 31.

(2)Represents 100% of the population of the markets in which U.S. Cellular has a controlling financial interest for financial reporting purposes. The total market population of 1.5 million in the 10 markets that U.S. Cellular transferred to AT&T Wireless in August 2003 is excluded from this amount for 2003, as the customers of these 10 markets are not included in U.S. Cellular’s consolidated customer base as of December 31, 2003 or 2004. The total market population of the two markets sold to ALLTEL in November 2004 and the six markets sold to AT&T Wireless in February 2004 are not included in this amount for 2004, as the customers sold in these transactions are not included in U.S. Cellular’s consolidated customer base as of December 31, 2004.

9

(3)U.S. Cellular’s customer base consists of the following types of customers:

December 31,	2004	2003	2002
Customers on postpay service plans in which the end user is a customer of U.S. Cellular (“postpay customers”)	4,303,000	3,942,000	3,765,000
End user customers acquired through U.S. Cellular’s agreement with a third party (“reseller customers”)*	467,000	316,000	213,000
Total postpay customer base	4,770,000	4,258,000	3,978,000
Customers on prepaid service plans in which the end user is a customer of U.S. Cellular (“prepaid customers”)	175,000	151,000	125,000
Total customers	4,945,000	4,409,000	4,103,000

*Pursuant to its agreement with the third party, U.S. Cellular is compensated by the third party on a postpay basis; as a result, all customers U.S. Cellular has acquired through this agreement are considered to be postpay customers.

(4)Calculated using 2003, 2002 and 2001 Claritas population estimates for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. “Total market population” is used only for the purposes of calculating market penetration, which is calculated by dividing customers by the total market population (without duplication of population in overlapping markets).

(5)Management uses this measurement to assess the amount of service revenue U.S. Cellular generates each month on a per-unit basis. Variances in this measurement are monitored and compared to variances in expenses on a per-unit basis. Average monthly service revenue per customer is calculated as follows:

Year Ended or at December 31,	2004		2003		2002
	(as restated)		(as restated)		(as restated)
Service Revenue (000s)	$	2,616,946	$	2,418,922	$	2,100,213
Divided by average customers during period (000s)	4,679		4,263		3,702
Divided by twelve months in each period	12		12		12
Average monthly revenue per customer	$	46.61	$	47.29	$	47.28

(6)Postpay churn rate per month represents the percentage of the postpay customer base that disconnects service each month, including both postpay customers and reseller customer numbers. Reseller customers can disconnect service without the associated account number being disconnected from U.S. Cellular’s network if the reseller elects to reuse the customer telephone number. Only those reseller customer numbers that are disconnected from U.S. Cellular’s network are counted in the number of postpay disconnects. The calculation divides the total number of postpay and reseller customers who disconnect service during the period by the number of months in such period, and then divides that quotient by the average monthly postpay customer base, which includes both postpay and reseller customers, for such period.

(7)For a discussion of the components of this calculation, see “Operating Expenses – Selling, General and Administrative.”

Operating Revenues

Year Ended December 31,	2004		2003		2002
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)		(as restated)		(as restated)
Retail service (1)	$	2,271,280	$	2,027,094	$	1,702,402
Inbound roaming	171,600		221,536		250,162
Long-distance and other (1)	174,066		170,292		147,649
Service Revenues	2,616,946		2,418,922		2,100,213
Equipment sales	191,255		158,832		98,662
Total Operating Revenues	$	2,808,201	$	2,577,754	$	2,198,875

(1)Certain amounts reported in prior years have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.

Operating revenues increased $230.4 million, or 9%, to $2,808.2 million in 2004 from $2,577.8 million in 2003, and increased $378.9 million, or 17%, in 2003 from $2,198.9 million in 2002.

Service revenues increased $198.0 million, or 8%, to $2,616.9 million in 2004 from $2,418.9 million in 2003, and increased $318.7 million, or 15%, in 2003 from $2,100.2 million in 2002. Service revenues primarily consist of: (i) charges for access, airtime, roaming and value-added services provided to U.S. Cellular’s retail customers (“retail service”); (ii) charges to other wireless carriers whose customers use U.S. Cellular’s wireless systems when roaming (“inbound roaming”); and (iii) charges for long-distance calls made on U.S. Cellular’s systems. The increases in both years were primarily due to the growth in the number of retail customers in each year. Monthly service revenue per customer averaged $46.61 in 2004, $47.29 in 2003 and $47.28 in 2002.

Retail service revenues increased $244.2 million, or 12%, to $2,271.3 million in 2004 from $2,027.1 million in 2003, and increased $324.7 million, or 19%, in 2003 from $1,702.4 million in 2002. Growth in U.S. Cellular’s average customer base of 10% and 15% in 2004 and 2003, respectively, and an increase in average monthly retail service revenues per customer were the primary reasons for the increases in retail service revenues in all three years. The average number of customers is affected by the timing of acquisitions and divestitures in all three years, including the acquisition of the Chicago market in August 2002 and the disposition of markets in August 2003, February 2004 and November 2004.

Also, in the fourth quarter of 2003, U.S. Cellular revised its business practices related to the billing of contract termination fees.  This change resulted in an increase in amounts billed to customers that ultimately were deemed uncollectible.  At the time of the change in business practice, U.S. Cellular recorded revenues related to such fees at the time of billing, and recorded bad debts expense in subsequent periods when the related accounts receivable were determined to be uncollectible.  In the first quarter of 2005, U.S. Cellular changed its accounting to record revenues related to such fees only upon collection, in recognition of the fact that the collectibility of the revenues was not reasonably assured at the time of billing. In connection with the restatement discussed above, U.S. Cellular corrected its accounting effective October 1, 2003 to coincide with the timing of the change in business practice.  As a result of this change, 2004 retail service revenues and bad debts expense were $31.3 million and $30.7 million lower than they would have been under the practice used prior to October 1, 2003, and 2003 retail service revenues and bad debts expense were $6.5 million and $3.6 million lower than they would have been under the accounting method used prior to October 1, 2003.

U.S. Cellular anticipates that growth in the customer base in U.S. Cellular’s wireless markets will be slower in the future, primarily as a result of the increased competition in its markets and continued penetration of the consumer market. However, as U.S. Cellular expands its operations in recently acquired markets in future years, it anticipates adding customers and revenues in those markets, increasing its overall customer and revenue growth rates.

In addition, the increases in retail service revenues in both years reflect increases of $16.4 million in 2004 and $45.9 million in 2003 in amounts billed to U.S. Cellular’s customers to offset costs related to certain regulatory mandates, such as universal service funding, wireless number portability and E-911 infrastructure, which are being passed through to customers. In particular, the amounts U.S. Cellular charges to its customers to offset universal service funding costs increased significantly due to changes in FCC regulations beginning April 1, 2003.

Average monthly retail service revenues per customer increased 2% to $40.45 in 2004 from $39.62 in 2003 and increased 4% in 2003 from $37.97 in 2002. These increases were driven by an increase in average minutes of use per customer, the effect of which was partially offset by a decline in average revenue per minute of use. An increase in revenues from data-related products and services, which totaled $67.0 million in 2004, positively impacted average monthly retail service revenues per customer in 2004.

10

Monthly local retail minutes of use per customer averaged 539 in 2004, 422 in 2003 and 304 in 2002. The increases in both years were driven by U.S. Cellular’s focus on designing sales incentive programs and customer billing rate plans to stimulate overall usage. In 2003, the increase was also attributable to the acquisition of the Chicago market in August 2002, whose customers used more minutes per month than the U.S. Cellular average. The impact on retail service revenues of the increased minutes of use in both years was partially offset by a decrease in average revenue per minute of use. The decrease in average revenue per minute of use reflects the effects of increasing competition, which has led to the inclusion of an increasing number of minutes in package pricing plans. U.S. Cellular anticipates that its average revenue per minute of use will continue to decline in the future, reflecting increased competition and continued penetration of the consumer market.

Inbound roaming revenues decreased $49.9 million, or 23%, to $171.6 million in 2004 from $221.5 million in 2003, and decreased $28.7 million, or 11%, in 2003 from $250.2 million in 2002. The decreases in revenue related to inbound roaming on U.S. Cellular’s systems in both years primarily resulted from a decrease in revenue per roaming minute of use, partially offset by an increase in roaming minutes used. Also contributing to the decreases in both years were the transfer of the Florida and Georgia markets and the sale of the southern Texas markets to AT&T Wireless in August 2003 and February 2004, respectively; these markets had historically provided substantial amounts of inbound roaming revenues. The increases in inbound roaming minutes of use in both years were primarily driven by the overall growth in the number of customers throughout the wireless industry. The declines in revenue per minute of use in both years were primarily due to the general downward trend in negotiated rates.

U.S. Cellular anticipates that the future rate of growth in inbound roaming minutes of use will be reduced due to three factors:

•newer customers may roam less than existing customers, reflecting further penetration of the consumer market;

•the divestiture of U.S. Cellular’s markets in Florida and Georgia in August 2003 and in southern Texas in February 2004, which have historically provided substantial inbound roaming minutes of use; and

•U.S. Cellular’s roaming partners may switch their business from U.S. Cellular to other operators or to their own systems.

U.S. Cellular also anticipates that average inbound roaming revenue per minute of use will continue to decline, reflecting the continued general downward trend in negotiated rates.

Long-distance and other revenues increased $3.8 million, or 2%, to $174.1 million in 2004 from $170.3 million in 2003, and increased $22.7 million, or 15%, in 2003 from $147.6 million in 2002. The increases in both years primarily reflected $12.7 million and $12.7 million increases, respectively, in competitive eligible telecommunications carrier funds received for the states in which U.S. Cellular is eligible to receive such funds.

Partially offsetting the increase in 2004 were decreases in the remaining long-distance and other revenues. The decrease was driven by price reductions primarily related to long-distance charges on roaming minutes of use as well as U.S. Cellular’s increasing use of pricing plans for its customers which include long-distance calling at no additional charge. This effect was partially offset by an increase in the volume of long-distance calls billed by U.S. Cellular to other wireless carriers whose customers used U.S. Cellular’s systems to make long-distance calls.

In 2003, the increase in the volume of long-distance calls on U.S. Cellular’s systems, by both U.S. Cellular’s customers and customers of other wireless carriers who were using U.S. Cellular’s systems while roaming, further increased long-distance and other revenues. This effect was partially offset by price reductions primarily related to long-distance charges on roaming minutes of use as well as U.S. Cellular’s increasing use of pricing plans for its customers, which include long-distance calling at no additional charge.

Equipment sales revenues increased $32.5 million, or 20%, to $191.3 million in 2004 from $158.8 million in 2003, and increased $60.1 million, or 61%, in 2003 from $98.7 million in 2002.

U.S. Cellular includes in its equipment sales revenues any handsets and related accessories sold to its customers, whether the customers are new to U.S. Cellular or are current customers who are changing handsets. U.S. Cellular also sells handsets to its agents at a price approximately equal to U.S. Cellular’s cost, before applying any rebates. Selling handsets to agents enables U.S. Cellular to provide better control over handset quality, establish roaming preferences and pass along quantity discounts.

In these transactions with agents, equipment sales revenues are recognized upon delivery of the related products to the agents, net of any anticipated agent rebates. In most cases, the agents receive a rebate from U.S. Cellular at the time the agents provide handsets to sign up new customers or retain current customers.

U.S. Cellular anticipates that it will continue to sell handsets to agents in the future, and that it will continue to provide rebates to agents who provide handsets to new and current customers. Equipment sales revenues have grown less significantly than cost of equipment sold in 2004 and 2003 due to the continued substantial discounting of handsets. This trend is occurring throughout the wireless industry.

The increase in equipment sales revenues in both years primarily represents $25.7 million and $52.7 million increases, respectively, in handset sales to agents. Customers added to U.S. Cellular’s customer base through its marketing distribution channels (“gross customer activations”), one of the primary drivers of equipment sales revenues, increased 15% in 2004 and 24% in 2003. In 2003, the number of handsets provided to current customers for retention purposes also increased significantly, further increasing equipment sales revenues. Retention transactions have increased as U.S. Cellular’s customer base has grown and it continued to focus on retaining customers by offering existing customers new handsets similar to those offered to new customers as the expiration dates of customers’ service contracts approached.

Operating Expenses

Year Ended December 31,	2004			2003		2002
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)			(as restated)		(as restated)
System operations (excluding depreciation shown below)	$	562,690		$	578,289	$	493,624
Cost of equipment sold	486,605			355,139		242,465
Selling, general and administrative	1,088,181			1,007,599		831,421
Depreciation	450,292			374,935		312,434
Amortization and accretion	47,910			57,564		39,161
Loss on impairment of intangible assets	—			49,595		—
(Gain) loss on assets held for sale	(10,806		)	45,908		—
Total Operating Expenses	$	2,624,872		$	2,469,029	$	1,919,105

Operating expenses increased $155.9 million, or 6%, to $2,624.9 million in 2004 from $2,469.0 million in 2003, and increased $549.9 million, or 29%, in 2003 from $1,919.1 million in 2002.

11

System operations expenses (excluding depreciation) decreased $15.6 million, or 3%, to $562.7 million in 2004 from $578.3 million in 2003, and increased $84.7 million, or 17%, in 2003 from $493.6 million in 2002. System operations expenses include charges from landline telecommunications service providers for U.S. Cellular’s customers’ use of their facilities, costs related to local interconnection to the landline network, charges for maintenance of U.S. Cellular’s network, long-distance charges, outbound roaming expenses and payments to third-party data product and platform developers. The changes in system operations expenses in both years were due to the following factors:

•the number of cell sites within U.S. Cellular’s systems increased 16% to 4,856 in 2004 from 4,184 in 2003, and increased 7% from 3,914 in 2002, as U.S. Cellular continues to expand and enhance coverage in its service areas both through acquisitions and internal growth; and

•increases in minutes of use both on U.S. Cellular’s systems and by U.S. Cellular’s customers using other systems while roaming.

The ongoing reductions both in the per-minute cost of usage on U.S. Cellular’s systems and in negotiated roaming rates offset the above factors.

As a result of the above factors, the components of system operations expenses were affected as follows:

•the cost of minutes used on U.S. Cellular’s systems increased $22.3 million, or 13% in 2004 and $47.2 million, or 39% in 2003, while total minutes used on U.S. Cellular’s systems increased 40% in 2004 and 67% in 2003;

•maintenance, utility and cell site expenses increased $14.0 million, or 8% in 2004 and $40.7 million, or 31%, in 2003, as the average number of cell sites in service increased 11% and 19% in 2004 and 2003, respectively; and

•expenses incurred when U.S. Cellular’s customers used other systems while roaming decreased $51.9 million, or 22%, in 2004 and decreased $0.5 million, or less than 1%, in 2003, primarily due to the decreases in the per-minute cost of roaming revenues and the divestitures of markets to AT&T Wireless in 2003 and 2004. The per-minute cost of roaming charges is negotiated with other carriers in tandem with per-minute rates for inbound roaming revenues and have experienced a general decline over the past several years. Also in 2004, U.S. Cellular received $8.1 million of refunds of sales taxes on outbound roaming transactions which had been charged to system operations expenses in prior years.

In addition, system operations expenses increased in 2003 due to the August 2002 acquisition of the Chicago market, as a full year of activity in the Chicago market is included in 2003 compared to only the period from August 7 – December 31 in 2002. System operations expenses decreased in 2004 and 2003 due to the August 2003 transfer and February 2004 sale of markets to AT&T Wireless.

In 2004 and 2003, roaming charges paid by U.S. Cellular to third parties when its customers roamed in the Chicago market and other recently launched markets declined.  Continued integration of these markets into U.S. Cellular’s operations resulted in increased use of U.S. Cellular’s system by U.S. Cellular’s customers and a corresponding decrease in roaming by its customers on other systems, primarily in the Midwest. Prior to acquiring the Chicago market and other recently launched markets, U.S. Cellular paid roaming charges to third parties when any of its customers roamed in those markets.

Monthly systems operations expenses per customer decreased 11% to $10.02 in 2004 and increased 2% to $11.30 in 2003 from $11.11 in 2002. This measurement is calculated by dividing total system operations expenses as reported for each of the annual periods by 12, then dividing that quotient by average customers during each respective 12-month period as defined in Footnote 5 to the table of summarized operating data shown at the beginning of the Wireless Telephone Operations section. Management uses this measurement to assess the cost of customer usage and network usage and maintenance on a per-unit basis and to monitor efficiency.

In total, U.S. Cellular expects system operations expenses to increase over the next few years, driven by the following factors:

•increases in the number of cell sites within U.S. Cellular’s systems as it continues to add capacity and enhance quality in all markets, and continues development activities in new markets; and

•increases in minutes of use, both on U.S. Cellular’s systems and by U.S. Cellular’s customers on other systems when roaming.

These factors are expected to be partially offset by anticipated decreases in the per-minute cost of usage both on U.S. Cellular’s systems and on other carriers’ networks. As the Chicago area and other recently launched markets have historically been among U.S. Cellular’s customers’ most popular roaming destinations, U.S. Cellular anticipates that the continued integration of these markets into its operations will result in a further increase in minutes of use by U.S. Cellular’s customers on its systems and a corresponding decrease in minutes of use by its customers on other systems, resulting in a lower overall increase in minutes of use by U.S. Cellular’s customers on other systems. Such a shift in minutes of use should reduce U.S. Cellular’s per-minute cost of usage in the future, to the extent that U.S. Cellular’s customers use U.S. Cellular’s systems rather than other carriers’ networks.

Cost of equipment sold increased $131.5 million, or 37%, to $486.6 million in 2004 from $355.1 million in 2003, and increased $112.6 million, or 46%, from $242.5 million in 2002.

The increases in both years were primarily due to $69.7 million and $80.7 million increases, respectively, in handset sales to agents. Also contributing were 15% and 24% increases, respectively, in gross customer activations as well as an increase in handsets sold to customers for retention purposes in both years as the number of retention transactions has increased. U.S. Cellular continued to focus on retaining customers by offering existing customers handset pricing similar to that offered to new customers as the expiration date of customers’ service contracts approached.

In addition, the overall cost per handset increased in 2004 as customers purchased higher-priced data-enabled handsets. These handsets are required for customers to access U.S. Cellular’s easyedge^SM suite of services which was launched in the second half of 2003.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $80.6 million, or 8%, to $1,088.2 million in 2004 from $1,007.6 million in 2003, and increased $176.2 million, or 21%, in 2003 from $831.4 million in 2002. Selling, general and administrative expenses primarily consist of salaries, commissions and expenses of field sales and retail personnel and offices; agent commissions and related expenses; corporate marketing, merchandise management and telesales department salaries and expenses; advertising; and public relations expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses also include the costs of operating U.S. Cellular’s customer care centers, the costs of serving customers and the majority of U.S. Cellular’s corporate expenses.

12

The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in 2004 is primarily due to the following:

•a $31.3 million increase in advertising costs, primarily related to marketing of the U.S. Cellular brand in the Chicago market and in the markets which were launched in 2004, and the marketing of U.S. Cellular’s data-related wireless services, which were launched in the second half of 2003;

•a $28.4 million increase in employee and agent commissions and other payments made to agents for the activation and retention of customers, primarily driven by the 15% increase in gross customer activations and the increase in customer retention transactions; and

•a $13.1 million increase in expenses related to amounts due into the federal universal service fund, primarily due to an increase in rates due to changes in the FCC regulations, substantially all of which is offset by increases in retail service revenue for amounts passed through to customers.

These increases were partially offset by the following:

•a $24.9 million decrease in billing-related expenses, primarily due to the migration in the third quarter of 2003 of the Chicago market’s operations to the same billing system used by U.S. Cellular’s other markets; and

•a $10.0 million net decrease in bad debts expense, primarily attributable to a change in U.S. Cellular’s accounting for contract termination fees charged when customers disconnect service prior to the end of their contracts. During the fourth quarter of 2003, U.S. Cellular revised its business practices related to the billing of contract termination fees.  This change resulted in an increase in amounts billed to customers that ultimately were deemed uncollectible.  At the time of the change in business practice, U.S. Cellular recorded revenues related to such fees at the time of billing, and recorded bad debts expense in subsequent periods when the related accounts receivable were determined to be uncollectible.  In the first quarter of 2005, U.S. Cellular changed its accounting to record revenues related to such fees only upon collection, in recognition of the fact that collectibility of the revenues was not reasonably assured a the time of billing.  In connection with the restatement discussed above, U.S. Cellular corrected its accounting effective October 1, 2003 to coincide with the timing of the change in business practice.  As a result, bad debts expense in 2004 and 2003 was $30.7 million and $3.6 million, respectively, lower than what it would have been under the practice used prior to October 1, 2003. The effect of this change was partially offset by the effect on bad debts expense of increased write-offs of accounts receivable associated with higher revenues in 2004.

The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in 2003 is primarily due to the following factors:

• a $38.4 million increase in advertising costs, primarily related to the continued marketing of the U.S. Cellular brand in the Chicago market and the marketing of U.S. Cellular’s data-related wireless services;

• a $40.6 million increase in expenses related to federal universal service fund contributions, based on an increase in rates due to changes in the FCC regulations, substantially all of which is offset by increases in retail service revenue for amounts passed through to customers; and

• a $29.3 million increase in billing-related expenses, primarily due to the expenses related to the maintenance of the Chicago market’s billing system and the transition to the system used in U.S. Cellular’s other operations in July 2003.

In both years, increases were also attributable to the increases in employee-related expenses associated with acquiring, serving and retaining customers, primarily as a result of the increase in U.S. Cellular’s customer base.

In 2003, the increase in salaries and other sales-related costs is also attributable to the expenses incurred in preparation for U.S. Cellular’s launch of data-related wireless services in its markets.

Sales and marketing cost per gross customer activation totaled $403 in 2004, $380 in 2003 and $365 in 2002. Sales and marketing cost per gross customer activation is not calculable using financial information derived directly from the Statements of Operations. The definition of sales and marketing cost per gross customer activation that U.S. Cellular uses as a measure of the cost to acquire additional customers through its marketing distribution channels may not be comparable to similarly titled measures that are reported by other companies.

Below is a summary of sales and marketing cost per gross customer activation for each period.

Year ended December 31,	2004			2003			2002
(Dollars in thousands, except per customer amounts)	(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)
Components of cost:
Selling, general and administrative expenses related to the acquisition of new customers (1)	$	496,436		$	429,149		$	368,808
Cost of equipment sold to new customers (2)	346,052			248,528			185,225
Less equipment sales revenues from new customers (3)	(214,696		)	(162,240		)	(100,133		)
Total cost	$	627,792		$	515,437		$	453,900
Gross customer activations (000s) (4)	1,557			1,357			1,244
Sales and marketing cost per gross customer activation	$	403		$	380		$	365

(1)Selling, general and administrative expenses related to the acquisition of new customers are reconciled to reported selling, general and administrative expenses as follows:

Year ended December 31,	2004			2003			2002
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)
Selling, general and administrative expenses, as reported	$	1,088,181		$	1,007,599		$	831,421
Less expenses related to serving and retaining customers	(591,745		)	(578,450		)	(462,613		)
Selling, general and administrative expenses related to the acquisition of new customers	$	496,436		$	429,149		$	368,808

(2)Cost of equipment sold to new customers is reconciled to reported cost of equipment sold as follows:

Year ended December 31,	2004			2003			2002
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)
Cost of equipment sold as reported	$	486,605		$	355,139		$	242,465
Less cost of equipment sold related to the retention of existing customers	(140,553		)	(106,611		)	(57,240		)
Cost of equipment sold to new customers	$	346,052		$	248,528		$	185,225

(3)Equipment sales revenue from new customers is reconciled to reported equipment sales revenues as follows:

Year ended December 31,	2004			2003			2002
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)
Equipment sales revenues, as reported	$	191,255		$	158,832		$	98,662
Less equipment sales revenues related to the retention of existing customers, excluding agent rebates	(27,267		)	(27,328		)	(13,108		)
Add agent rebate reductions of equipment sales revenues related to the retention of existing customers	50,708			30,736			14,579
Equipment sales revenues from new customers	$	214,696		$	162,240		$	100,133

(4)Gross customer activations represent customers added to U.S. Cellular’s customer base, during the respective periods presented, through its marketing distribution channels.

13

Monthly general and administrative expenses per customer, including the net costs related to the renewal or upgrade of service contracts of existing customers (“net customer retention costs”), remained unchanged at $13.46 in 2004, and increased 15% to $13.46 in 2003 from $11.73 in 2002. U.S. Cellular uses this measurement to assess the cost of serving and retaining its customers on a per-unit basis.

This measurement is reconciled to total selling, general and administrative expenses as follows:

Year ended December 31,	2004			2003			2002
(Dollars in thousands, except per customer amounts)	(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)
Components of cost (1):
Selling, general and administrative expenses, as reported	$	1,088,181		$	1,007,599		$	831,421
Less selling, general and administrative expenses related to the acquisition of new customers	(496,436		)	(429,149		)	(368,808		)
Add cost of equipment sold related to the retention of existing customers	140,553			106,611			57,240
Less equipment sales revenues related to the retention of existing customers, excluding agent rebates	(27,267		)	(27,328		)	(13,108		)
Add agent rebate reductions of equipment sales revenues related to the retention of existing customers	50,708			30,736			14,579
Net cost of serving and retaining customers	$	755,739		$	688,469		$	521,324
Divided by average customers during period (000s) (2)	4,679			4,263			3,702
Divided by twelve months in each period	12			12			12
Average monthly general and administrative expenses per customer	$	13.46		$	13.46		$	11.73

(1)These components were previously identified in the table which calculates sales and marketing cost per customer activation and related footnotes.

(2)Average customers for each respective period as previously listed in footnote 5 to the table of summarized operating data.

Depreciation expense increased $75.4 million, or 20%, to $450.3 million in 2004 from $374.9 million in 2003, and increased $62.5 million, or 20%, from $312.4 million in 2002. The increases in both years reflect rising average fixed asset balances, which increased 13% in 2004 and 23% in 2003. Increased fixed asset balances in both 2004 and 2003 resulted from the following factors:

•the addition of 840 and 507 new cell sites in 2004 and 2003, respectively, built to launch service and improve coverage and capacity in U.S. Cellular’s markets; and

•the acquisition in 2002 and continuing development of the Chicago market.

In addition, the following factors also contributed to the increase in 2004:

•certain Time Division Multiple Access (“TDMA”) digital radio equipment consigned to a third party for future sale was taken out of service and written down by $17.2 million prior to its consignment, increasing depreciation expense by that amount. This write-down was necessary to reduce the book value of the assets to be sold to their estimated proceeds from disposition;

•a reduction of useful lives of certain TDMA radio equipment, switch software and antenna equipment, which increased depreciation expense $14.9 million;

•in preparation for the implementation of a fixed asset management and tracking software system, including a bar code asset identification system, U.S. Cellular conducted a physical inventory review of its cell site fixed assets. As a result of the review, U.S. Cellular charged $11.9 million to depreciation expense for the write-off of certain assets; and

•an $11.3 million addition to depreciation expense related to the write-down of certain assets prior to their disposition.

Additionally, U.S. Cellular recorded $8.6 million less depreciation expense in 2004 than in 2003 as depreciation on the properties sold to AT&T Wireless and ALLTEL was only recorded through November 2003 and August 2004, respectively, in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.”

In 2003, U.S. Cellular took certain cell sites in which its antennae were co-located on third parties’ towers out of service, writing off the remaining net book value of the related assets. This write-off increased depreciation expense $7.0 million in 2003. These cell sites were acquired from another carrier in a 2001 transaction.

U.S. Cellular recorded $11.6 million less depreciation expense in 2003 than in 2002 as depreciation on the properties transferred to AT&T Wireless in the exchange transaction was only recorded through March 2003 in accordance with SFAS No. 144.

In 2002, U.S. Cellular charged $15.0 million to depreciation expense to reflect the write-off of certain analog equipment based on fixed asset inventory reviews performed in 2002.

Amortization and accretion expense decreased $9.7 million, or 17%, to $47.9 million in 2004 from $57.6 million in 2003, and increased $18.4 million, or 47%, from $39.2 million in 2002. The decrease in 2004 was primarily caused by an $8.6 million decrease in amortization related to the customer list intangible assets and other amortizable assets acquired in the Chicago market transaction during 2002. The customer list assets are amortized using the declining balance method, based on average customer-retention periods of each customer list.  Therefore, decreasing amounts of amortization expense will be recorded in each 12-month period following the establishment of each customer list asset. The increase in 2003 is primarily driven by the $11.1 million increase in amortization related to the customer list intangible assets and other deferred charges acquired in the Chicago market transaction during 2002.

In accordance with SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” as of January 1, 2003, U.S. Cellular began accreting liabilities for future remediation obligations associated with leased properties. Such accretion expense totaled $5.0 million in 2004 and $4.4 million in 2003.

Loss on impairment of intangible assets totaled $49.6 million in 2003. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” U.S. Cellular performed the annual impairment test for its investment in licenses for 2003. The carrying value of the licenses in each reporting unit was compared to the estimated fair value of the licenses in each reporting unit.  The license values in two reporting units were determined to be impaired and a loss of $49.6 million was recorded. The 2004 annual testing resulted in no impairments.

See “Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Investments in Licenses and Goodwill” for further discussion of TDS’s and U.S. Cellular’s intangible asset impairment testing.

14

(Gain) loss on assets held for sale totaled a gain of $10.8 million in 2004 and a loss of $45.9 million in 2003.

In 2004, the gain related to two divestitures completed in 2004. The sale of two consolidated markets to ALLTEL in November 2004 resulted in a $10.1 million gain on assets held for sale. The remaining amount of $0.7 million was recorded in 2004 as a reduction of a $22.0 million estimated loss recorded in the fourth quarter 2003 on the sale of U.S. Cellular markets in southern Texas to AT&T Wireless on February 18, 2004. The result was an aggregate loss of $21.3 million, representing the difference between the carrying value of the markets sold and the cash received in the transaction. For further discussion of these transactions, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Acquisitions, Exchanges and Divestitures.”

In 2003, $23.9 million of the total loss represents the difference between the fair value of the licenses U.S. Cellular received and expects to receive in the AT&T Wireless exchange transaction completed on August 1, 2003, and the recorded value of the Florida and Georgia market assets it transferred to AT&T Wireless. The loss also includes a $22.0 million write-down related to the wireless assets which were sold to AT&T Wireless in February 2004.

Operating Income

Operating income increased $74.6 million, or 69%, to $183.3 million in 2004 from $108.7 million in 2003, and decreased $171.1 million, or 61%, in 2003 from $279.8 million in 2002. The operating income margins (as a percent of service revenues) were 7.0% in 2004, 4.5% in 2003 and 13.3% in 2002.

The increase in operating income and operating income margin in 2004 reflect the following:

•increased service revenues primarily due to the growth in the number of retail customers; and

•gains recorded on assets held for sale in 2004 compared to losses recorded on assets held for sale and loss on intangible assets in 2003.

The increase in 2004 was partially offset by the following:

•increased expenses related to the launch of new operating markets in 2004;

•decreased roaming revenue resulting from a decrease in revenue per roaming minute of use;

•decreased operating income due to markets divested to AT&T Wireless;

•increased equipment subsidies reflecting increased competition and gross customer activations as well as an increase in handsets sold to customers for retention purposes;

•increased depreciation expense driven by an increase in average fixed assets related to ongoing improvements to and the expansion of U.S. Cellular’s wireless network as well as asset write-offs; and

•increased selling, general and administrative expenses primarily driven by increased advertising and commissions expenses.

The declines in operating income and operating income margin in 2003 reflect the following:

•increased selling, general and administrative expenses, primarily driven by the acquisition and subsequent transition of the Chicago market’s operations and billing system; and additional costs related to advertising and marketing the U.S. Cellular brand, especially in the Chicago market, and related to the launch of U.S. Cellular’s data-related wireless services in certain markets;

•increased depreciation expense, driven by an increase in average fixed assets related to ongoing improvements to and the expansion of U.S. Cellular’s wireless network;

•increased system operations expenses, primarily driven by increases in the number of cell sites and increases in the number of minutes used by U.S. Cellular’s customers and roaming customers on U.S. Cellular’s network; and

•increased equipment subsidies, primarily due to U.S. Cellular’s practice of selling handsets to agents; this practice began in 2002 and increased the volume of handset sales, as well as the increase in customer retention-related equipment transactions.

Operating income and operating income margin in 2003 also reflect:

•the losses on assets held for sale related to both the exchange transaction completed on August 1, 2003, and the sale transaction involving AT&T Wireless that was pending at December 31, 2003; and

•the loss on impairment of intangible assets.

These expense increases were partially offset by increased service revenues, which were driven by growth in the number of customers served by U.S. Cellular’s systems and increases in average monthly revenue per customer.

U.S. Cellular expects most of the above factors, except for those related to the transition of the Chicago market and the gains and losses on assets held for sale and impairments related to events in 2004 and 2003, to continue to have an effect on operating income and operating margins for the next several quarters. Any changes in the above factors, as well as the effects of other drivers of U.S. Cellular’s operating results, may cause operating income and operating margins to fluctuate over the next several quarters.

U.S. Cellular anticipates that it will continue to invest in and incur expenses related to markets it has acquired and in which it has initiated service over the past few years. In addition, U.S. Cellular anticipates initiating marketing operations in the St. Louis, Missouri market in 2005. The timing of such a market launch is not known, but will require significant continued investment and is expected to have a significant impact on U.S. Cellular’s results when marketing operations begin.

U.S. Cellular also incurred additional expenses related to its launch of data-related wireless services in many of its markets in 2004 and 2003, and expects to incur expenses related to its continued marketing of data-related wireless services in the next few years.

As a result, depending on the timing and effectiveness of these initiatives, U.S. Cellular’s operating income may range from $220 million to $270 million in 2005, including $530 million of anticipated depreciation, amortization and accretion expenses, compared to operating income of $183.3 million in 2004. Its corresponding operating margins may range from 7% to 9% in 2005, compared to an operating margin of 7.0% in 2004.

U.S. Cellular anticipates that service revenues will total approximately $2.9 billion in 2005, compared to service revenues of $2.62 billion in 2004. The anticipated service revenue growth in 2005 reflects the continued growth in U.S. Cellular’s customer base and the continued marketing of data-related wireless services in its markets.

Depending on the timing and effectiveness of its marketing efforts, U.S. Cellular anticipates that its net customer activations from its marketing channels will total 425,000 to 475,000 in 2005.

15

U.S. Cellular anticipates that its net costs associated with customer growth, service and retention as well as initiation of new services, launches in new markets, and fixed asset additions will continue to grow. U.S. Cellular anticipates that its net customer retention costs will increase in the future as its customer base grows, as competitive pressures continue and as per-unit handset costs increase without compensating increases in the per-unit sales price of handsets to customers and agents.

Effects of Competition on Operating Income

U.S. Cellular competes directly with several wireless communications services providers, including enhanced specialized mobile radio service providers, in each of its markets. In general, there are between four and six competitors in each wireless market in which U.S. Cellular provides service. U.S. Cellular generally competes against each of the five near-nationwide wireless companies: Verizon Wireless, Sprint (and affiliates), Cingular Wireless, LLC (which recently merged with AT&T Wireless), T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Nextel Communications (“Nextel”). However, not all five of these competitors operate in all markets where U.S. Cellular does business. U.S. Cellular believes that these competitors have substantially greater financial, technical, marketing, sales, purchasing and distribution resources than it does. In addition, Sprint recently proposed to acquire Nextel which would likely increase this competitor’s access to such resources.

The use of national advertising and promotional programs by such national wireless operators may be a source of additional competitive and pricing pressures in all U.S. Cellular markets, even if those operators may not provide service in a particular market. U.S. Cellular provides wireless services comparable to the national competitors, but the other wireless companies operate in a wider geographic area and are able to offer no- or low-cost roaming and long-distance calling packages over a wider area on their own networks than U.S. Cellular can offer on its network. If U.S. Cellular offers the same calling area as one of these competitors, it will incur roaming charges for calls made in portions of the calling area that are not part of its network.

In the Midwest, U.S. Cellular’s largest contiguous service area, it can offer larger regional service packages without incurring significant roaming charges than it is able to offer in other parts of its network. U.S. Cellular also employs a customer satisfaction strategy throughout its markets which it believes has contributed to a relatively low customer churn rate, which in turn has had a positive impact on its cost to add a net new customer.

Some of U.S. Cellular’s competitors bundle other services, such as landline telephone service and Internet access, with their wireless communications services, which U.S. Cellular either does not have the ability to offer or has chosen not to offer.

In addition, U.S. Cellular competes against both larger and smaller regional wireless companies in certain areas, including ALLTEL, Western Wireless Corporation (“Western Wireless”) and Rural Cellular Corporation, and against resellers of wireless services. Since each of these competitors operates on systems using spectrum licensed by the FCC and has comparable technology and facilities, competition for customers among these systems in each market is principally on the basis of quality of service, price, size of area covered, services offered and responsiveness of customer service. ALLTEL has recently agreed to acquire Western Wireless, which may increase this competitor’s financial, technical, marketing, sales, purchasing and distribution resources.

Since U.S. Cellular’s competitors do not disclose their subscriber counts in specific regional service areas, market share for the competitors in each regional market cannot be accurately determined.

Effects of Wireless Number Portability on Operating Income

The FCC has adopted wireless number portability rules requiring wireless carriers to allow a customer to retain, subject to certain geographical limitations, their existing telephone number when switching from one telecommunications carrier to another.  These rules have become effective for all U.S. Cellular markets on or before May 24, 2004.

U.S. Cellular has been successful in facilitating number portability requests in a timely manner. The implementation of wireless number portability has not had a material effect on U.S. Cellular’s results of operations to date. However, U.S. Cellular is unable to predict the impact that the implementation of number portability will have in the future. The implementation of wireless number portability may increase churn rates for U.S. Cellular and other wireless companies, as the ability of customers to retain their wireless telephone numbers removes a significant barrier for customers who wish to change wireless carriers. However, to the extent U.S. Cellular loses customers, the effect may be offset to the extent it is able to obtain additional new customers who wish to change their service from other wireless carriers as a result of wireless number portability. The future volume of any porting requests, and the processing costs related thereto, may increase U.S. Cellular’s operating costs in the future. Any of the above factors could have an adverse effect on U.S. Cellular’s competitive position, costs of obtaining new subscribers, liquidity, financial position and results of operations.

WIRELINE TELEPHONE OPERATIONS

TDS operates its wireline telephone operations through TDS Telecommunications Corporation (“TDS Telecom”), a wholly owned subsidiary. TDS Telecom served 1,157,200 equivalent access lines at the end of 2004, an increase of 70,200 lines over 2003. At the end of 2003, TDS Telecom served 1,087,000 equivalent access lines, an increase of 84,400 lines over 2002. TDS Telecom provides service through incumbent local exchange carriers and through competitive local exchange carriers. Equivalent access lines are derived by converting each high-capacity data line to the estimated equivalent number, in terms of capacity, of switched access lines.

TDS Telecom’s incumbent local exchange carriers served 730,400 equivalent access lines at the end of 2004 compared to 722,200 at the end of 2003 and 711,200 at the end of 2002. The incumbent local exchange carrier operations have grown primarily through internal growth. Internal growth, net of disconnections, added 8,200 equivalent access lines in 2004, 11,000 lines in 2003 and 5,900 lines in 2002. Acquisitions added 27,000 lines in 2002.

TDS Telecom’s competitive local exchange carrier served 426,800 equivalent access lines at the end of 2004 compared to 364,800 at the end of 2003 and 291,400 lines at the end of 2002. Internal growth in equivalent access lines has occurred as competitive local exchange carrier operations have increased their presence in current markets.

16

TDS Telecom Operating Income

Year Ended December 31,	2004			2003			2002
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)
Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier Operations
Operating revenues	$	658,330		$	653,038		$	626,865
Operating expenses	475,152			475,894			459,214
Operating income	183,178			177,144			167,651
Competitive Local Exchange Carrier Operations
Operating revenues	226,259			213,800			177,166
Operating expenses	372,367			239,657			239,409
Operating (loss)	(146,108		)	(25,857		)	(62,243		)
Intra-company elimination
Revenue	(4,444		)	(3,850		)	(2,501		)
Expense	(4,444		)	(3,850		)	(2,501		)
TDS Telecom Operating Income	$	37,070		$	151,287		$	105,408

TDS Telecom’s operating income decreased $114.2 million, or 75%, to $37.1 million in 2004 from $151.3 million in 2003, and increased $45.9 million, or 44%, in 2003 from $105.4 million in 2002. The primary causes for the decrease in 2004 were an $87.9 million loss on the impairment of long-lived assets and a $29.4 million loss on the impairment of intangible assets of the competitive local exchange carriers. Operating income increased in 2003 primarily from improved results from the competitive local exchange carrier business.

For 2005, TDS Telecom expects modest revenue growth with revenues from the incumbent local exchange carrier operations in the range of $655 million to $665 million and revenues from the competitive local exchange carrier operations in the range of $240 million to $250 million. Operating income from the incumbent local exchange carrier is anticipated to range from $170 million to $180 million while competitive local exchange carrier operating losses are anticipated to range from $15 million to $10 million.

Following is a table of summarized operating data for TDS Telecom’s incumbent local exchange carrier and competitive local exchange carrier operations.

Year Ended December 31,	2004	2003	2002
Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier:
Equivalent access lines	730,400	722,200	711,200
Growth in equivalent access lines:
Acquisitions	—	—	27,000
Internal growth	8,200	11,000	5,900
Dial-up Internet service accounts	101,300	112,900	117,600
Digital subscriber line (DSL) accounts	41,900	23,600	9,100
Long distance customers (1)	295,000	230,500	197,500
Competitive Local Exchange Carrier:
Equivalent access lines	426,800	364,800	291,400
Dial-up Internet service accounts	18,200	22,200	24,700
Digital subscriber line (DSL) accounts	29,000	20,100	11,800
TDS Telecom employees	3,375	3,460	3,570

(1)Beginning January 1, 2004, long distance customers reflect those lines that have chosen TDS Telecom as their primary interexchange carrier. Prior to that, a count of customers was used.

Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier Operations

Operating Revenues

Year Ended December 31,	2004		2003		2002
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)		(as restated)		(as restated)
Local service	$	204,834	$	199,616	$	192,519
Network access and long distance	362,890		363,109		346,667
Miscellaneous	90,606		90,313		87,679
Total Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier Operating Revenues	$	658,330	$	653,038	$	626,865

Operating revenues increased $5.3 million, or less than 1%, to $658.3 million in 2004 from $653.0 million in 2003, and increased $26.1 million, or 4%, in 2003 from $626.9 million in 2002.

Local service revenues (provision of local telephone exchange service within the franchise serving area of TDS Telecom’s incumbent local exchange carriers) increased $5.2 million, or 3%, to $204.8 million in 2004 from $199.6 million in 2003, and increased $7.1 million, or 4%, in 2003 from $192.5 million in 2002. Equivalent access line growth resulted in increases in revenues of $2.3 million in 2004 and $3.0 million in 2003. The sale of custom calling and advanced features increased revenues by $3.3 million in 2004 and $2.9 million in 2003.

Network access and long distance revenues (compensation for carrying interstate and intrastate long distance traffic on TDS Telecom’s local telephone networks and reselling long distance service) decreased $ 0.2 million, or less than 1%, to $362.9 million in 2004 from $363.1 million in 2003, and increased $16.4 million, or 5%, in 2003 from $346.7 million in 2002. Long distance service revenues increased by $3.4 million in 2004 and $3.6 million in 2003. Revenue generated from increased network usage increased $2.7 million in 2004 and $5.0 million in 2003. Compensation from state and national revenue pools for recovery of the expense of providing network access decreased $5.7 million in 2004 and $0.2 million in 2003.

Miscellaneous revenues (charges for (i) leasing, selling, installing and maintaining customer premise equipment; (ii) providing billing and collection services; (iii) providing Internet services; and (iv) selling of digital broadcast satellite receivers) increased $0.3 million, or less than 1%, to $90.6 million in 2004 from $90.3 million in 2003, and increased $2.6 million, or 3%, in 2003 from $87.7 million in 2002. Revenue from data transmission services including dial-up Internet service and digital subscriber line services increased $5.7 million in 2004 and $3.8 million in 2003. Billing and collection revenues increased by $0.6 million in 2004 and $0.7 million in 2003. Revenues decreased $3.2 million in 2004 due to the conclusion of a customer contract and lower levels of sales in customer premises equipment and inside wiring. Revenue from computer networking services declined $5.1 million in 2003 due to the migration of this service into other product lines.

Operating Expenses

Year Ended December 31,	2004		2003		2002
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)		(as restated)		(as restated)
Cost of services and products (exclusive of depreciation and amortization included below)	$	166,262	$	165,135	$	142,919
Selling, general and administrative expense	177,225		180,372		186,063
Depreciation and amortization	131,665		130,036		130,232
Loss on impairment of long-lived assets	—		351		—
Total Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier Operating Expenses	$	475,152	$	475,894	$	459,214

Operating expenses decreased $0.7 million, or less than 1%, to $475.2 million in 2004 from $475.9 million in 2003, and increased $16.7 million, or 4%, in 2003 from $459.2 million in 2002. A $7.7 million charge for an early retirement incentive plan in 2003 was partially responsible for the operating expense increase in 2003 and was also responsible for the decrease in 2004. Incumbent local exchange carrier expenses as a percent of revenues were 72.2% in 2004, 72.9% in 2003 and 73.3% in 2002.

17

Cost of services and products increased $1.2 million, or less than 1%, to $166.3 million in 2004 from $165.1 million in 2003, and increased $22.2 million, or 16%, in 2003 from $142.9 million in 2002. Local telephone company payroll decreased $4.0 million in 2004 primarily due to the effects of the early retirement incentive plan in 2003 and increased $5.9 million in 2003. Cost of goods sold related to digital subscriber line service and business systems decreased $0.7 million in 2004 and increased $3.4 million in 2003. Access costs increased by $1.2 million in 2004 and $3.7 million in 2003. The cost of providing Internet service, digital subscriber line service and long-distance service to a larger customer base increased expenses $7.3 million in 2003.

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $3.2 million, or 2%, to $177.2 million in 2004 from $180.4 million in 2003, and decreased $5.7 million, or 3%, in 2003 from $186.1 million in 2002. The decrease in 2004 reflects the trend in the decline of the rate of customer growth. In 2003, corporate management expenses increased $10.5 million partially reflecting expense related to an employee retirement incentive plan. Bad debt expense recorded in 2002 included $7.8 million related to the write-off of pre-petition accounts receivable due to the bankruptcy of WorldCom and Global Crossing. In 2003, the incumbent local exchange carriers recovered $2.7 million of the bad debt write-offs related to the WorldCom bankruptcy filing.

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $1.7 million, or 1%, to $131.7 million in 2004 from $130.0 million in 2003, and decreased slightly in 2003 from $130.2 million in 2002. Investment in plant and equipment did not change significantly in 2004, 2003 and 2002.

Operating Income increased $6.1 million, or 3%, to $183.2 million in 2004 from $177.1 million in 2003, and increased $9.4 million, or 6%, in 2003 from $167.7 million in 2002. The incumbent local exchange operating margin was 27.8% in 2004, 27.1% in 2003 and 26.7% in 2002. Operating margin was impacted in 2003 by costs associated with an early retirement incentive plan totaling $7.7 million.

TDS Telecom’s incumbent local exchange carrier operations are subject to the provisions of SFAS No. 71, “Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation.” TDS Telecom periodically reviews the criteria for applying these provisions to determine whether continuing application of SFAS No. 71 is appropriate. TDS Telecom believes that such criteria are still being met and therefore has no current plans to change its method of accounting.

Competitive Local Exchange Carrier Operations

TDS Telecom began offering competitive local exchange carrier services in the fourth quarter of 1997. These services are offered in the Madison, greater Fox Valley, Milwaukee, Racine, Kenosha, Janesville and Beloit, Wisconsin markets; in the Rockford and Lake County, Illinois markets; in the greater Grand Rapids, Kalamazoo, Battle Creek, Holland, Grand Haven, Lansing, Jackson, Ann Arbor and the western suburbs of Detroit, Michigan markets; Minneapolis/St. Paul, Rochester, Duluth, St. Cloud and Brainerd, Minnesota markets; and in Fargo, North Dakota. Equivalent access lines increased by 17% in 2004 (62,000), 25% in 2003 (73,400) and 52% in 2002 (99,300).

Operating Revenues

Year Ended December 31,	2004 (as restated)		2003 (as restated)		2002 (as restated)
(Dollars in thousands)
Total Competitive Local Exchange Carrier Operating Revenues	$	226,259	$	213,800	$	177,166

Operating revenues (revenue from the provision of local and long-distance telephone service and access revenue from long-distance providers) increased $12.5 million, or 6%, to $226.3 million in 2004 from $213.8 million in 2003 and increased $36.6 million, or 21%, in 2003 from $177.2 million in 2002. The increases were primarily due to the increases in equivalent access lines in both years. During 2004, wholesale access revenue charged to other carriers for utilizing TDS Telecom network infrastructure declined due to rate decreases. Wholesale access rate declines negatively impacted 2004 revenues by $8.7 million.

Operating Expenses

Year Ended December 31,	2004		2003		2002
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)		(as restated)		(as restated)
Cost of services and products (exclusive of depreciation and amortization included below)	$	92,045	$	86,377	$	85,909
Selling, general and administrative expense	124,623		115,354		124,441
Depreciation and amortization	38,349		33,363		29,059
Loss on impairment of long-lived assets	87,910		4,563		—
Loss on impairment of intangible assets	29,440		—		—
Total Competitive Local Exchange Carrier Operating Expenses	$	372,367	$	239,657	$	239,409

Operating expenses increased $132.7 million, or 55%, to $372.4 million in 2004 from $239.7 million in 2003, and increased slightly in 2003 from $239.4 million in 2002. Operating expenses increased in 2004, primarily due to impairment losses of $87.9 million and $29.4 million recorded on property, plant and equipment and goodwill, respectively. See “Regulatory Orders” for a discussion of the impairment losses. During 2004, additional general and administrative expenses were incurred to secure continual access to unbundled network elements at reasonable rates.

In 2003, the competitive local exchange carriers recovered $1.4 million of bad debt write-offs related to WorldCom and Global Crossing bankruptcies in 2002 and reduced bad debt expenses by $7.4 million as a result of improved credit management. Expenses in 2002 included a $2.4 million charge relating to the bankruptcies discussed above and an increase in retail bad debt expense of $8.6 million. In 2003, TDS Metrocom recorded a $4.6 million loss on impairment of long-lived assets in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” This impairment relates to assets in a market that TDS Metrocom subsequently decided not to enter.

Operating loss totaled $146.1 million in 2004, $25.9 million in 2003 and $62.2 million in 2002. The operating loss from competitive local exchange operations increased considerably in 2004 due to the losses on asset impairments. The primary cause for the decrease in operating loss in 2003 was due to increased access line equivalents and improved credit management.

18

Regulatory Orders

The FCC has recently expanded the exemption from network unbundling requirements to include fiber to the curb architecture. In the Triennial Review Order, the FCC concluded that, where incumbent local exchange carriers deploy fiber facilities all the way to the home, they will not be required to provide competitive local exchange carriers with access to those facilities in entirely new developments, known as greenfield deployment. When incumbents overbuild existing copper facilities with fiber to the home, they will either have to maintain the old copper facilities, or, if they decide to retire the copper loop plant, provide competitors with a voice channel over the new fiber facilities. This decision was upheld on appeal by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, and the Supreme Court did not take the case up on appeal. TDS Metrocom’s appeal of the rules related to access to fiber and mixed copper/fiber facilities was denied by the Supreme Court, and those rules are now final. On December 15, 2004, the FCC adopted an Order revising the unbundling rules, preserving access to the most common high-capacity loops and transport used by TDS Telecom, and limiting access of competitive local exchange carriers to certain unbundled network elements, particularly those used to provide non-facilities based competitive local exchange services. To the extent that TDS Telecom competitive local exchange carrier operations rely on an unbundled network element platform provided by incumbent carriers, this decision, if not overturned on appeal, will lead to a phase-out of that method of competitive entry. Moreover, the loss of some access and transport options as a result of the FCC’s Order is unfavorable for TDS Telecom competitive local exchange carrier operations and could negatively impact the company’s ability to provide broadband services to end users.

In response to petitions filed by the Regional Bell Operating Company for increases in rates for certain wholesale services that it provides to competitive local exchange carriers, the state public service commissions of Illinois, Wisconsin and Michigan have issued orders that will adversely affect the cost of providing some services for TDS Telecom’s competitive local exchange carrier operations in those states, primarily services to residential customers and certain small business customers. The pricing data for the major markets of TDS Telecom’s competitive local exchange carrier became available in the fourth quarter of 2004. These pricing changes, as well as other regulatory changes and competitive pressures in 2004, triggered an impairment review by TDS Telecom of its competitive local exchange carrier operations’ tangible and intangible assets. As a result of the impairment review, TDS Telecom concluded that the long-lived tangible assets of its competitive local exchange carrier operations were impaired and recorded an $87.9 million loss in the Statement of Operations. TDS Telecom also concluded that goodwill associated with the competitive local exchange carrier operations was impaired and recorded a loss of $29.4 million in the Statement of Operations. See Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – “Licenses and Goodwill” and “Property, Plant and Equipment” for further discussions of the impairments.

Changes in the telecommunications regulatory environment, including the effects of potential changes in the rules governing universal service funding and potential changes in the amounts or methods of intercarrier compensation, could have a material adverse effect on TDS Telecom’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Effects of Wireless Number Portability

The FCC has adopted wireless number portability rules requiring wireless carriers to allow a customer to retain, subject to certain geographical limitations, their existing telephone number when switching from one telecommunications carrier to another.  Local exchange carriers in the largest 100 metropolitan statistical areas in the United States were required to be capable of facilitating wireless number portability as of November 24, 2003. Local exchange carriers outside such 100 areas were required to implement wireless number portability requirements on May 24, 2004 or within six months of the relevant request, whichever is later. However, local exchange carriers may seek waivers or extensions of these deadlines pursuant to the Communications Act and the FCC’s rules.  TDS Telecom has established a schedule to implement local number portability.  As of December 31, 2004, TDS Telecom has equipped 96% of its incumbent local exchange carrier physical access lines and will complete the remaining local number portability schedule by mid 2005.  Through December 31, 2004, TDS Telecom has received 233 wireline to wireless port requests.  TDS is unable to predict the impact that the implementation of wireless number portability will have on the business of TDS Telecom in the future.

INFLATION

Management believes that inflation affects TDS’s business to no greater extent than the general economy.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Share-Based Payment

SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment,” was issued in December 2004 and becomes effective for TDS in the third quarter of 2005.  The statement requires that compensation cost resulting from all share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements.  TDS has reviewed the provisions of this statement and expects to record compensation expense for certain share-based payment transactions, primarily related to stock options, in the Statement of Operations upon the adoption of this standard. See the “Stock-Based Compensation” section in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for a pro forma impact on net income and earnings per share.

FINANCIAL RESOURCES

TDS operates a capital- and marketing-intensive business.  In recent years, TDS has generated cash from its operations, received cash proceeds from divestitures, used its short-term credit facilities and used long-term debt financing to fund its construction costs and operating expenses.  TDS anticipates further increases in wireless customers and wireline equivalent access lines, and in revenues and operating expenses. Cash flows may fluctuate from quarter to quarter and from year to year due to seasonality, market startups and other factors.

Year Ended December 31,	2004			2003			2002
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)
Cash flows from (used in)
Operating activities	$	797,442		$	970,956		$	827,572
Investing activities	(614,580		)	(744,043		)	(1,398,196		)
Financing activities	47,665			(587,934		)	1,780,629
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	230,527		$	(361,021	)	$	1,160,005

Cash Flows From Operating Activities represents a significant source of funds to TDS. Net income (loss) including adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities, excluding changes in assets and liabilities from operations totaled $887.3 million in 2004, $897.5 million in 2003 and $937.0 million in 2002. Included in the adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities in 2004 is a deduction for the payment of $68.1 million of accreted interest on the repayment of U.S. Cellular’s Liquid Yield Option Notes. Distributions from unconsolidated investments provided $49.2 million in 2004, $45.4 million in 2003 and $31.3 million in 2002. Changes in assets and liabilities from operations required $89.9 million in 2004, provided $73.5 million in 2003 and required $109.4 million in 2002, reflecting timing differences in the collection of accounts receivable, payment of accounts payable and accrued taxes.

19

Cash Flows From Investing Activities primarily represents uses of funds to acquire, construct and upgrade modern high-quality communications networks and facilities as a basis for creating long-term value for shareowners. In recent years, rapid changes in technology and new opportunities have required substantial investments in revenue-enhancing and cost-reducing upgrades of TDS’s networks. Cash flows used for investing activities primarily represent cash required for capital expenditures, and the acquisition of wireless and wireline telephone properties and wireless spectrum. Proceeds from merger and divestiture transactions have provided funds in recent years which have partially offset the cash requirements for investing activities; however, such sources cannot be relied upon to provide continuing or regular sources of financing.

The primary purpose of TDS’s construction and expansion expenditures is to provide for customer growth, to upgrade service, launch new markets, and to take advantage of service-enhancing and cost-reducing technological developments in order to maintain competitive services. Cash expenditures for capital additions required $806.8 million in 2004, $776.0 million in 2003 and $918.1 million in 2002. U.S. Cellular’s capital additions totaled $656.2 million in 2004, $630.9 million in 2003 and $732.4 million in 2002. These additions represent the construction of 840, 507 and 437 cell sites in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, as well as other plant additions and costs related to the development of U.S. Cellular’s office systems. In 2004, 2003 and 2002, these plant additions included approximately $13 million, $58 million and $215 million, respectively, for the migration to a single digital wireless equipment platform. Other plant additions in all three years also included significant amounts related to the replacement of retired assets. TDS Telecom’s capital additions for its incumbent local exchange carrier operations totaled $103.1 million in 2004, $111.9 million in 2003 and $116.5 million in 2002, representing expenditures for switch modernization and outside plant facilities to maintain and enhance the quality of service and offer new revenue opportunities. TDS Telecom’s capital expenditures for competitive local exchange carrier operations totaled $35.2 million in 2004, $27.3 million in 2003 and $51.9 million in 2002 for switching and other network facilities. Corporate and other capital expenditures totaled $12.3 million in 2004, $5.9 million in 2003 and $17.3 million in 2002.

Cash used for acquisitions, excluding cash acquired, totaled $12.3 million in 2004, $5.9 million in 2003 and $529.7 million in 2002. TDS’s acquisitions include primarily the purchase of controlling interests in wireless markets and telephone properties, minority interests that increased the ownership of majority-owned markets and wireless spectrum. In 2004, U.S. Cellular purchased certain minority interests in several wireless markets in which it already owned a controlling interest for $40.8 million in cash. U.S. Cellular purchased two additional minority interests in majority-owned wireless markets in 2003 for $2.3 million and capitalized costs associated with the AT&T Wireless exchange of $2.8 million. On August 7, 2002, U.S. Cellular completed the acquisition of the Chicago market. U.S. Cellular paid $431.9 million in cash, net of cash acquired, and issued $175 million of 9% Series A notes due in 2032. U.S. Cellular financed the cash portion of the purchase price by using its revolving credit facility and a $105 million loan from TDS. An additional $10.5 million was paid in January 2003 to adjust the purchase price for the final working capital adjustment. TDS also acquired two telephone companies ($78.2 million), three PCS licenses ($18.0 million) and additional minority interests in majority-owned markets ($3.1 million) in 2002.

TDS received cash of $247.6 million from divestitures in 2004. The sale of wireless properties in southern Texas by U.S. Cellular to AT&T Wireless provided $96.5 million. The sale of wireless properties to ALLTEL provided U.S. Cellular $79.8 million (net of $0.4 million cash divested) and TDS Telecom $62.7 million. U.S. Cellular also received $8.5 million from the sale of Daytona in 2004 and paid $0.3 million to buy out the partner in this investment. In 2003, U.S. Cellular received $34.0 million from AT&T Wireless in connection with the exchange of properties for licenses. See “Acquisitions, Exchanges and Divestitures” in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section.

U.S. Cellular is a limited partner in a designated entity that deposited $9.0 million with the FCC related to the wireless spectrum Auction 58, which took place in early 2005. The designated entity is consolidated by U.S. Cellular for financial reporting purposes. In 2002, U.S. Cellular received cash refunds of $56.1 million on wireless spectrum Auction 35 deposits.

Cash Flows From Financing Activities primarily reflects changes in short-term debt balances, proceeds from the sale of long-term debt and from entering into forward contracts, cash used to repurchase Common Shares and cash used for the repayment of long-term notes and the repurchase and conversion of debt securities.

TDS has used short-term debt to finance acquisitions, for general corporate purposes and to repurchase Common Shares. Internally generated funds as well as proceeds from forward contracts and the sale of non-strategic cellular and other investments, from time to time, have been used to reduce short-term debt. In addition, TDS has taken advantage of opportunities to reduce short-term debt with proceeds from the sale of long-term debt securities, including sales of debt securities by subsidiaries.

In 2004, U.S. Cellular issued $330 million of 7.5% senior notes due June 2034 and $100 million of 6.7% senior notes due December 2033. The net proceeds of these offerings totaled approximately $412.5 million. Of this amount, U.S. Cellular used $163.3 million to redeem its Liquid Yield Option Notes at accreted value. The balance of the net proceeds, together with borrowings under revolving credit facilities, was used to redeem all $250 million of U.S. Cellular’s 7.25% senior notes. The Liquid Yield Option Notes redemption includes the repayment of principal amount of the original debt of $95.2 million, presented as an item reducing cash flow from financing activities, and the payment of $68.1 million of accreted interest, presented as an item reducing cash flow from operating activities.

In 2003, TDS redeemed and cancelled the $300 million of Trust Originated Preferred Securities. The redemption was financed with cash on hand. U.S. Cellular repaid the remaining principal amount outstanding on its 9% Series A notes with $40.7 million in cash, which was financed using U.S. Cellular’s revolving credit facilities. The 9% Series A notes are now retired. In 2003, U.S. Cellular received $432.9 million net proceeds from the issuance of $444.0 million of 6.7% senior notes due December 2033. These proceeds were used to repay all outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility entered into in 1997.

In 2002, TDS received $1,631.8 million from forward contracts related to its investments in Deutsche Telekom, Vodafone and VeriSign. A portion of the proceeds from the Deutsche Telekom and VeriSign forward contracts was used by TDS to pay down TDS’s short-term debt. U.S. Cellular received $159.9 million from forward contracts related to its Vodafone investment and used the proceeds to pay down short-term debt.

20

In November 2002, U.S. Cellular issued $130 million of 8.75% senior notes due in November 2032. The net proceeds of $129.8 million, after the reimbursement of expenses, were used to repurchase a portion of the $175 million 9% Series A notes that U.S. Cellular issued in connection with the acquisition of the Chicago market.

TDS retired a total of $70.5 million and $51.0 million of medium-term notes at par value in 2003 and 2002, respectively. Borrowings under revolving credit facilities totaled $420.0 million in 2004, primarily to repay long-term debt and fund capital expenditures; $279.3 million in 2003, primarily to fund capital expenditures; and $542.6 million in 2002, primarily to fund the Chicago market acquisition and capital expenditures. Repayments under the revolving credit facilities totaled $390.0 million in 2004, $739.3 million in 2003 and $346.6 million in 2002. Dividends paid on TDS Common and Preferred Shares, excluding dividends reinvested, totaled $38.0 million in 2004, $36.2 million in 2003 and $34.4 million in 2002.

The Board of Directors of TDS has authorized the repurchase of TDS Common Shares. During 2004, TDS repurchased 214,800 of its Common Shares, for an aggregate purchase price of $14.9 million, or an average of $69.15 per share including commissions. During 2003, TDS repurchased 1,960,900 of its Common Shares, for an aggregate purchase price of $92.4 million, or an average of $47.10 per share including commissions. No shares were repurchased in 2002. Cash required for the repurchase of the Common Shares totaled $20.4 million in 2004 and $86.8 million in 2003, reflecting differences in the number of shares acquired and timing differences in the cash disbursements.

The Board of Directors of U.S. Cellular from time to time has authorized the repurchase of U.S. Cellular Common Shares not owned by TDS. U.S. Cellular’s primary repurchase program expired in December 2003. However, U.S. Cellular has an ongoing authorization to repurchase a limited amount of U.S. Cellular Common Shares on a quarterly basis, primarily for use in employee benefit plans. In 2004, U.S. Cellular repurchased 91,700 of its Common Shares under this authorization for an aggregate purchase price of $3.9 million, or an average of $42.62 per share including commissions. U.S. Cellular did not purchase any of its Common Shares in 2003 and 2002.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

TDS believes that cash flows from operating activities, existing cash and cash equivalents and funds available from line of credit arrangements provide sufficient financial resources to finance TDS’s near-term capital, business development and expansion expenditures. TDS and its subsidiaries may have access to public and private capital markets to help meet their long-term financing needs. TDS and its subsidiaries anticipate accessing public and private capital markets to issue debt and equity securities when and if capital requirements, financial market conditions and other factors warrant.

However, the availability of external financial resources is dependent on economic events, business developments, technological changes, financial conditions or other factors. If at any time financing is not available on terms acceptable to TDS, TDS might be required to reduce its business development and capital expenditure plans, which could have a materially adverse effect on its business and financial condition. TDS does not believe that any circumstances that could materially adversely affect TDS’s liquidity or its capital resources are currently reasonably likely to occur, but it cannot provide assurances that such circumstances will not occur or that they will not occur rapidly. Economic downturns, changes in financial markets or other factors could rapidly change the availability of TDS’s liquidity and capital resources. Uncertainty of access to capital for telecommunications companies, deterioration in the capital markets, other changes in market conditions or other factors could limit or restrict the availability of financing on terms and prices acceptable to TDS, which could require TDS to reduce its construction, development, acquisition programs and Common Share repurchase programs.

TDS generates substantial funds from the operations of U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom. Cash flows from operating activities totaled $797.4 million in 2004, $971.0 million in 2003 and $827.6 million in 2002. TDS and its subsidiaries had cash and cash equivalents totaling $1,171.1 million at December 31, 2004.

Revolving Credit Facilities

As discussed below, TDS and its subsidiaries had $1,266.4 million of revolving credit facilities available for general corporate purposes as well as an additional $75.0 million of bank lines of credit as of December 31, 2004.

TDS had a $600 million revolving credit facility with a group of banks at December 31, 2004. TDS had $3.4 million of letters of credit outstanding against the revolving credit facility, leaving $596.6 million available for use. On December 9, 2004, TDS entered into an agreement to amend the terms and conditions of this facility. The primary changes to the terms and conditions are that (i) the maturity date has been extended to December 2009 and (ii) the material adverse change condition has been removed with respect to drawdowns. Borrowings bear interest at the London InterBank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a contractual spread based on TDS’s credit rating. At December 31, 2004, the contractual spread was 30 basis points (the one month LIBOR rate was 2.4% at December 31, 2004). Under certain circumstances, with less than two days’ notice of intent to borrow, interest on borrowings are at the prime rate less 50 basis points (the prime rate was 5.25% at December 31, 2004).

TDS also had $75 million of direct bank lines of credit at December 31, 2004, all of which were unused. The terms of the direct bank lines of credit provide for borrowings at negotiated rates up to the prime rate (the prime rate was 5.25% at December 31, 2004).

On December 19, 2003, U.S. Cellular amended its $325 million revolving credit facility with a group of banks to increase the size of the facility to $700 million. At December 31, 2004, U.S. Cellular’s $700 million revolving credit facility had $30.0 million of borrowings and $0.2 million of letters of credit outstanding against it leaving $669.8 million available for use. On December 9, 2004, U.S. Cellular entered into an agreement to amend the terms and conditions of this facility. The primary changes to the terms and conditions are that (i) the maturity date has been extended to December 2009; (ii) the facility fee and certain interest rates payable on loans have been reduced; (iii) a utilization fee has been added for each day that facility usage exceeds 50% of the total facility; and (iv) the material adverse change condition has been removed with respect to drawdowns. Borrowings bear interest at the LIBOR rate plus a contractual spread based on U.S. Cellular’s credit rating. At December 31, 2004, the contractual spread was 30 basis points (the one-month LIBOR rate was 2.4% at December 31, 2004). Under certain circumstances, with less than two days’ notice of intent to borrow, interest on borrowings are at the prime rate less 50 basis points (the prime rate was 5.25% at December 31, 2004).

The financial covenants associated with TDS’s and U.S. Cellular’s lines of credit require that each company maintain certain debt-to- capital and interest coverage ratios. In addition, the financial covenants associated with revolving credit facilities and lines of credit of certain subsidiaries require that these subsidiaries maintain certain debt-to-capital and interest coverage ratios. The covenants of U.S. Cellular’s revolving credit facility prescribe certain terms associated with intercompany loans from TDS or TDS subsidiaries to U.S. Cellular or U.S. Cellular subsidiaries.

21

TDS’s and U.S. Cellular’s interest costs on its revolving credit facilities would increase if their credit ratings from either Standard & Poor’s or Moody’s were lowered. However, their credit facilities would not cease to be available solely as a result of a decline in their credit ratings. A downgrade in TDS’s or U.S. Cellular’s credit ratings could adversely affect their ability to renew existing, or obtain access to new, credit facilities in the future. Standard & Poor’s currently rates both TDS and U.S. Cellular at A- with a Negative Outlook. Moody’s currently rates both Baa1 with a Negative Outlook.

The maturity dates of certain of TDS’s and U.S. Cellular’s credit facilities would accelerate in the event of a change in control.

The continued availability of the revolving credit facilities requires TDS and U.S. Cellular to comply with certain negative and affirmative covenants, maintain certain financial ratios and represent certain matters at the time of each borrowing. On April 19, 2004 and December 22, 2004, TDS and U.S. Cellular announced that they would restate certain financial statements. The restatements resulted in defaults under the revolving credit agreements. TDS and U.S. Cellular were not in violation of any covenants that require TDS and U.S. Cellular to maintain certain financial ratios. TDS and U.S. Cellular did not fail to make any scheduled payments under such revolving credit agreements. TDS and U.S. Cellular received waivers from the lenders associated with the credit agreements under which the lenders agreed to waive any defaults that may have occurred as a result of the restatements. As of December 31, 2004, TDS and U.S. Cellular were in compliance with all covenants and other requirements set forth in their revolving credit agreements.

As disclosed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, TDS and its audit committee concluded on November 9, 2005 to restate the Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the three years ended December 31, 2004. The restatement resulted in defaults under the revolving credit agreements and one line of credit agreement.  TDS and U.S. Cellular were not in violation of any covenants that require TDS and U.S. Cellular to maintain certain financial ratios.  TDS and U.S. Cellular did not fail to make any scheduled payments under such credit agreements.  TDS and U.S. Cellular received waivers from the lenders associated with the credit agreements, under which the lenders agreed to waive any defaults that may have occurred as a result of the restatement.

Long-Term Financing

In June 2004, U.S. Cellular issued $330 million in aggregate principal amount of unsecured 7.5% senior notes due June 15, 2034. The net proceeds from this offering, after deducting underwriting discounts, were approximately $319.6 million. Also, in June 2004, U.S. Cellular issued $100 million in aggregate principal amount of unsecured 6.7% senior notes due December 15, 2033, priced to yield 7.21% to maturity. The net proceeds from this offering, after deducting underwriting discounts, were approximately $92.9 million. This was a further issuance of U.S. Cellular’s 6.7% senior notes that were issued on December 8, 2003 in the aggregate principal amount of $444 million.

The total net proceeds from the 7.5% and 6.7% note offerings completed in June 2004, after deducting underwriting discounts, were approximately $412.5 million. Of this amount, $163.3 million was used to redeem U.S. Cellular’s Liquid Yield Option Notes in July 2004, at accreted value. The balance of the net proceeds, together with borrowings under the revolving credit agreement, was used to redeem all $250 million of U.S. Cellular’s 7.25% senior notes in August 2004. No gain or loss was recognized as a result of such redemptions. However, U.S. Cellular wrote off $3.6 million of deferred debt expenses related to the redemption of long-term debt to other income (expense), net in the Statement of Operations in 2004.

On December 15, 2004, TDS issued notice of its intent to redeem $17.2 million of medium-term notes in 2005. These notes carry interest rates of 9.25%-9.35%. This amount has been reclassified to current portion of long-term debt on the Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2004. TDS redeemed these notes on January 18, 2005 and February 10, 2005 at a price equal to the principal amount plus accrued interest to the redemption date. TDS redeemed medium-term notes aggregating $70.5 million in 2003 and recorded a loss of $0.8 million on the redemption of $5.0 million of these notes. The remaining medium-term notes were redeemed at par value in 2003.

In December 2003, U.S. Cellular issued $444.0 million in 6.7% senior notes due December 2033. Interest on notes is paid semi-annually. U.S. Cellular may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, at any time prior to maturity at a redemption price equal to the greater of (a) 100% of the principal amount of such notes, plus accrued but unpaid interest, or (b) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest thereon discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at the Treasury Rate plus 0.30%. The proceeds were used to repay all outstanding short-term debt.

In September 2003, TDS’s subsidiary trusts, TDS Capital I and TDS Capital II, redeemed all of their outstanding Trust Originated Preferred Securities (“TOPrS^SM”). The redemption price of both the 8.5% and 8.04% TOPrS^SM was equal to 100% of the principal amount, or $25.00 per security, plus accrued and unpaid distributions. The outstanding amount of the 8.5% TOPrS^SM redeemed was $150 million. The outstanding amount of the 8.04% TOPrS^SM redeemed was $150 million. There was no gain or loss on the redemption of these securities. TDS wrote off deferred expenses related to the TOPrS^SM totaling $8.7 million that were previously included in other assets and deferred charges on the Balance Sheet to other income (expense), net in the Statement of Operations.

In November 2002, U.S. Cellular sold $130 million of 8.75% senior notes due in November 2032. Interest is paid quarterly. U.S. Cellular may redeem the notes beginning in 2007 at the principal amount plus accrued interest. The $129.8 million net proceeds from the sale of the notes (after reimbursement of expenses) were used to purchase a portion of the 9% Series A notes that were issued to PrimeCo Wireless Communications LLC (“PrimeCo”). In January 2003, U.S. Cellular repurchased the remaining $45.2 million of 9% Series A notes from PrimeCo related to the Chicago market acquisition. The repurchase was financed using short-term debt. Following such repurchases, all of the 9% Series A notes were cancelled.

In January 2005, the TDS Board of Directors authorized the issuance of up to $350 million of debt securities as a drawdown on a TDS shelf registration statement. Also in January 2005, the TDS Board of Directors authorized a committee of the TDS Board of Directors to approve the repayment of some or all of TDS Telecom’s notes issued under certain loan agreements with the Rural Utilities Service, Rural Electrification Administration, Rural Telephone Bank, Federal Financing Bank, Rural Telephone Finance Cooperative, and/or other federal government or government-sponsored entities. As of March 1, 2005, no debt securities have been issued and the committee has taken no action to cause TDS Telecom loans to be repaid.

As of December 31, 2004, TDS and its subsidiaries were in compliance with all covenants and other requirements set forth in long-term debt indentures. TDS does not have any rating downgrade triggers that would accelerate the maturity dates of its long-term debt. However, a downgrade in TDS’s credit rating could adversely affect its ability to refinance existing, or obtain access to new, long-term debt in the future.

22

Marketable Equity Securities and Forward Contracts

TDS and its subsidiaries hold a substantial amount of marketable equity securities that are publicly traded and can have volatile movements in share prices. TDS and its subsidiaries do not make direct investments in publicly traded companies and all of these interests were acquired as a result of sales, trades or reorganizations of other assets.

The investment in Deutsche Telekom AG (“Deutsche Telekom”) resulted from TDS’s disposition of its over 80%-owned personal communications services operating subsidiary, Aerial Communications, Inc., to VoiceStream in exchange for stock of VoiceStream, which was then acquired by Deutsche Telekom in exchange for Deutsche Telekom stock. The investment in Vodafone Group Plc (“Vodafone”) resulted from certain dispositions of non-strategic wireless investments to or settlements with AirTouch Communications, Inc. (“AirTouch”) in exchange for stock of AirTouch, which was then acquired by Vodafone whereby TDS and its subsidiaries received American Depositary Receipts representing Vodafone stock. The investment in VeriSign, Inc. (“VeriSign”) is the result of the acquisition by VeriSign of Illuminet, Inc., a telecommunications entity in which several TDS subsidiaries held interests. The investment in Rural Cellular Corporation (“Rural Cellular”) is the result of a consolidation of several wireless partnerships in which TDS subsidiaries held interests in Rural Cellular, and the distribution of Rural Cellular stock in exchange for these interests. A contributing factor in TDS’s decision not to dispose of the investments is that their tax basis is significantly lower than current stock prices, and therefore would trigger a substantial taxable gain upon disposition.

TDS and its subsidiaries have entered into a number of forward contracts with counterparties related to the marketable equity securities that they hold. The forward contracts mature from May 2007 to September 2008 and, at TDS’s and U.S. Cellular’s option, may be settled in shares of the respective securities or cash. TDS and U.S. Cellular have provided guarantees to the counterparties which provide assurance that all principal and interest amounts will be paid when due. If shares are delivered in the settlement of the forward contract, TDS and U.S. Cellular would incur a current tax liability at the time of delivery based on the difference between the tax basis of the marketable equity securities delivered and the net amount realized through maturity. Deferred taxes have been provided for the difference between the book basis and the tax basis of the marketable equity securities and are included in deferred tax liabilities on the Balance Sheet. As of December 31, 2004, such deferred tax liabilities totaled $1,284.9 million.

TDS and U.S. Cellular are required to comply with certain covenants under the forward contracts. On April 19, 2004 and December 22, 2004, TDS and U.S. Cellular announced that they would restate certain financial statements. The restatements resulted in defaults under certain of the forward contracts. TDS and U.S. Cellular did not fail to make any scheduled payments under such forward contracts. TDS and U.S. Cellular were not in violation of any covenants that require TDS and U.S. Cellular to maintain certain financial ratios. TDS and U.S. Cellular received waivers from the counterparty to such forward contracts under which the counterparty agreed to waive any defaults that may have occurred as a result of the restatement. As of December 31, 2004, TDS and U.S. Cellular were in compliance with all covenants and other requirements set forth in the forward contracts.

As disclosed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, TDS and its audit committee concluded on November 9, 2005 to restate the Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the three years ended December 31, 2004. The restatement resulted in defaults under certain of the forward contracts.  TDS and U.S. Cellular were not in violation of any covenants that require TDS and U.S. Cellular to maintain certain financial ratios.  TDS and U.S. Cellular did not fail to make any scheduled payments under such forward contracts.  TDS and U.S. Cellular received waivers from the counterparty to such forward contracts, under which the counterparty agreed to waive any defaults that may have occurred as a result of the restatement.

Capital Expenditures

U.S. Cellular’s anticipated capital expenditures for 2005 primarily reflect plans for construction, system expansion and the buildout of certain of its personal communication service licensed areas. U.S. Cellular plans to finance its construction program using internally generated cash and short-term financing. U.S. Cellular’s estimated capital spending for 2005 is $570 million to $610 million. These expenditures primarily address the following needs:

•Expand and enhance U.S. Cellular’s coverage in its service areas.

•Provide additional capacity to accommodate increased network usage by current customers.

•Enhance U.S. Cellular’s retail store network and office systems.

U.S. Cellular’s overlay of its previously utilized technologies, primarily TDMA, with Code Division Multiple Access (“CDMA-1XRTT”) technology was completed in 2004, at a total cost of $286 million. U.S. Cellular will utilize CDMA-1XRTT technology in building out the licenses it has acquired and expects to acquire in the future from AT&T Wireless.

While U.S. Cellular does not expect a significant portion of its capital spending in 2005 to be related to the buildout of newly acquired licensed areas, it does expect that capital spending related to these areas could be significant in 2006 and over the following several years.

TDS Telecom’s estimated capital spending for 2005 is $150 million to $165 million. The incumbent local exchange companies are expected to spend $120 million to $130 million to provide for normal growth and to upgrade plant and equipment to provide enhanced services. The competitive local exchange companies are expected to spend $30 million to $35 million primarily to build switching and transmission facilities to meet the needs of a growing customer base. TDS Telecom plans to finance its construction program using primarily internally generated cash.

TDS Telecom currently has three fiber to the premises trials underway. First is a complete fiber build-out of a large subdivision in one of the incumbent local exchange carrier markets. Second is a combination fiber to the premises overbuild and asymmetric digital subscriber line deployment in one of the existing incumbent local exchange carrier markets. Lastly, a fiber to the premises overbuild in a Regional Bell Operating Company market where TDS Telecom is currently a competitive local exchange carrier. The capital spending guidance provided above includes the impact of these projects that relates to 2005.

Acquisitions, Exchanges and Divestitures

TDS assesses its holdings on an ongoing basis in order to maximize the benefits derived from its operations. TDS reviews attractive opportunities to acquire additional telecommunications companies and wireless spectrum, which add value to the business. As part of this strategy, TDS may from time to time be engaged in negotiations relating to the acquisition of companies, strategic properties or wireless spectrum.

U.S. Cellular is a limited partner in Carroll Wireless, an entity which participated in the auction of wireless spectrum designated by the FCC as Auction 58. Carroll Wireless was qualified to bid on spectrum which was available only to companies that fall under the FCC definition of “designated entities,” which are small businesses that have a limited amount of assets. Carroll Wireless was a successful bidder for 17 licensed areas in Auction 58, which ended on February 15, 2005. These 17 licensed areas cover portions of 11 states and are in markets which are either adjacent to or overlap current U.S. Cellular licensed areas.

23

On March 4, 2005, Carroll Wireless increased the amount on deposit with the FCC to approximately $26 million, from $9 million initially deposited, and filed an application with the FCC seeking a grant of the subject licenses. The aggregate amount due to the FCC for the 17 licenses is $129.9 million, net of all bidding credits to which Carroll Wireless is entitled as a designated entity. U.S. Cellular consolidates Carroll Wireless for financial reporting purposes, pursuant to the guidelines of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 46R (“FIN 46R”), as U.S. Cellular anticipates absorbing a majority of Carroll Wireless’ expected gains or losses.

Carroll Wireless is in the process of developing its long-term business and financing plans. As of March 4, 2005, U.S. Cellular has made capital contributions and advances to Carroll Wireless and/or its general partner of approximately $26 million. Pending finalization of Carroll Wireless’ permanent financing plan, and upon request by Carroll Wireless, U.S. Cellular may make capital contributions and advances to Carroll Wireless and/or its general partner of up to $130 million to fund the payments to the FCC and additional working capital.

Recently, TDS has been selling or trading markets that are not strategic to long-term success and redeploying capital to markets it believes offer strategic benefits. TDS may from time to time be engaged in negotiations relating to the disposition of other non-strategic properties.

2004 Activity

On December 20, 2004, U.S. Cellular completed the sale of its Daytona Beach Florida 20 megahertz C block personal communications service license to MetroPCS California/Florida, Inc. (“MetroPCS”) for $8.5 million. TDS recorded impairment losses of $1.8 million in 2004 and $3.5 million in 2003 in gain (loss) on investments included within investment and other income (expense) on the Statement of Operations related to the Daytona license. Also included in gain (loss) on investments in 2004 was $0.3 million associated with buying out the former partner of the Daytona investment.

On November 30, 2004, TDS and U.S. Cellular completed the sale to ALLTEL of certain wireless properties. TDS and U.S. Cellular subsidiaries sold three consolidated properties and six minority interests to ALLTEL for $142.9 million in cash, including repayment of debt and working capital that is subject to adjustment. TDS recorded a pre-tax gain of $50.9 million related to the ALLTEL transaction representing the excess of the cash received over the net book value of the assets and liabilities sold. The portion of the gain related to the two consolidated markets included in operations of $10.1 million was recorded in (gain) loss on assets held for sale in the Statement of Operations. The remaining portion of the gains of $40.8 million was recorded in gain (loss) on investments included within investment and other income (expense) of the Statement of Operations. TDS has included the results of operations of the markets sold to ALLTEL in the Statement of Operations through November 30, 2004.

On February 18, 2004, U.S. Cellular completed the sale of certain of its wireless properties in southern Texas to AT&T Wireless for $96.5 million in cash, including a working capital adjustment. The U.S. Cellular properties sold to AT&T Wireless included wireless assets and customers in six markets. An aggregate loss of $21.3 million (including a $22.0 million estimate of the loss on assets of operations held for sale in the fourth quarter of 2003 and a $0.7 million reduction of the loss in 2004) was recorded as a (gain) loss on assets of operations held for sale (included in operating expenses), representing the difference between the carrying value of the markets sold to AT&T Wireless and the cash received in the transaction. On December 31, 2003, U.S. Cellular reflected the assets and liabilities to be transferred to AT&T Wireless as assets and liabilities held for sale in accordance with SFAS No. 144. U.S. Cellular has included the results of operations of the markets sold to AT&T Wireless in the Statement of Operations through February 17, 2004.

In addition, in 2004 U.S. Cellular purchased certain minority interests in several wireless markets in which it already owned a controlling interest for $40.8 million in cash and $2.0 million to be paid in 2005. These acquisitions increased licenses, goodwill and customer lists by $5.6 million, $4.2 million and $12.9 million, respectively.

In aggregate, the 2004 divestitures decreased licenses by $2.8 million and goodwill by $34.9 million. Licenses and goodwill associated with the southern Texas transaction with AT&T Wireless that closed in 2004 were included in assets of operations held for sale in 2003. However, an adjustment of $0.3 million was made in 2004 to reduce the amount of licenses associated with the southern Texas markets resulting in an increase in licenses in 2004.

2003 Activity

During 2003, U.S. Cellular completed an exchange with AT&T Wireless along with the acquisition of two minority interests.

On August 1, 2003, U.S. Cellular completed the transfer of properties to AT&T Wireless and the assignments to it by AT&T Wireless of a portion of the licenses covered by the agreement with AT&T Wireless. On the initial closing date, U.S. Cellular also received approximately $34.0 million in cash and minority interests in six markets in which it currently owns a controlling interest. Also on the initial closing date, U.S. Cellular transferred wireless assets and customers in 10 markets in Florida and Georgia to AT&T Wireless. The assignment and development of certain licenses has been deferred by U.S. Cellular for a period of up to five years from the closing date, in accordance with the agreement. U.S. Cellular will take possession of the licenses in staggered closings over that five-year period to comply with service requirements of the Federal Communications Commission. The acquisition of the licenses in the exchange was accounted for as a purchase by U.S. Cellular and the transfer of the properties by U.S. Cellular to AT&T Wireless was accounted for as a sale. TDS capitalized $2.8 million of costs associated with the AT&T Wireless transaction.

The 15 licenses that have been transferred to U.S. Cellular as of December 31, 2003, with a recorded value of $136.6 million, are included in licenses on the Balance Sheet. The 21 licenses that have not yet been assigned to U.S. Cellular, with a recorded value of $42.0 million, are included in license rights on the Balance Sheet. TDS has included the results of operations in the Florida and Georgia markets in the Statement of Operations until the date of the transfer, August 1, 2003.

Prior to the close of the AT&T Wireless exchange, U.S. Cellular allocated $70.0 million of goodwill related to the properties transferred to AT&T Wireless to assets of operations held for sale in accordance with SFAS No. 142. A loss of $23.9 million was recorded as a loss on assets held for sale (included in operating expenses) representing the difference between the book value of the markets transferred to AT&T Wireless and the fair value of the assets received or to be received in this transaction.

In addition, in 2003, U.S. Cellular acquired the minority interest in two entities which held licenses for $2.3 million.

In aggregate, the 2003 acquisitions, divestitures and exchanges increased licenses by $59.7 million and license rights by $42.0 million and reduced U.S. Cellular goodwill by $62.4 million.

24

2002 Activity

On August 7, 2002, U.S. Cellular completed the acquisition of the assets and certain liabilities of Chicago 20 MHz, LLC, now known as United States Cellular Operating Company of Chicago, LLC (“USCOC of Chicago” or the “Chicago market”) from PrimeCo. USCOC of Chicago operates a wireless system in the Chicago major trading area. USCOC of Chicago is the holder of certain FCC licenses, including a 20 megahertz PCS license in the Chicago major trading area (excluding Kenosha County, Wisconsin) covering 13.2 million population equivalents.

U.S. Cellular financed the purchase price ($617.8 million) using $327.3 million of revolving lines of credit, $175.0 million in 30 year notes issued to PrimeCo, a $105.0 million loan from TDS and a $10.5 million accrued payable. TDS has included the Chicago market results of operations in the Statement of Operations subsequent to the purchase date.

The tangible fixed assets were valued at fair value. The personal communications service licenses were valued at $163.5 million. The customer list was assigned a value of $43.4 million and is being amortized based on a 30-month average customer retention period using the declining balance method.

Total goodwill attributed to the Chicago market acquisition aggregated $168.4 million. In January 2003, U.S. Cellular repurchased the $45.2 million 9% Series A notes that remained outstanding at December 31, 2002, at 90% of face value. The $4.5 million gain on retirement of the 9% Series A notes was credited to goodwill, reducing the aggregate goodwill attributed to the Chicago market acquisition to $163.9 million. Such goodwill is deductible for tax purposes and will be amortized over 15 years.

In addition, TDS acquired two incumbent local telephone companies, three additional personal communications service licenses and additional minority interests in majority-owned markets during 2002.

In aggregate, the 2002 acquisitions increased licenses by $181.5 million, U.S. Cellular goodwill by $172.3 million and TDS Telecom’s incumbent local exchange carrier goodwill by $62.8 million.

Repurchase of Securities and Dividends

In 2003, the Board of Directors of TDS authorized the repurchase of up to 3.0 million TDS Common Shares through February 2006. As market conditions warrant, TDS may repurchase Common Shares on the open market or at negotiated prices in private transactions, at prices approximating then existing market prices. TDS may use repurchased shares to fund acquisitions and for other corporate purposes. In 2004, TDS repurchased 214,800 Common Shares under this authorization for an aggregate purchase price of $14.9 million, representing an average per share price of $69.15 including commissions. As of December 31, 2004, shares remaining available for repurchase under this authorization totaled 824,300. In 2003, TDS repurchased 1,961,000 Common Shares under this authorization for an aggregate purchase price of $92.4 million, representing an average per share price of $47.10, including commissions.

In 2000, U.S. Cellular authorized the repurchase of up to 4.2 million U.S. Cellular Common Shares through three separate 1.4 million share programs. This repurchase program expired in December 2003. However, U.S. Cellular has an ongoing authorization to repurchase a limited amount of U.S. Cellular Common Shares on a quarterly basis, primarily for use in employee benefit plans. In 2004, U.S. Cellular repurchased 91,700 U.S. Cellular Common Shares under this authorization for an aggregate purchase price of $3.9 million, representing an average per share price of $42.62 including commissions. No U.S. Cellular Common Shares were repurchased in 2003 or 2002.

TDS paid total dividends on its Common and Preferred Stock of $38.0 million in 2004, $36.2 million in 2003 and $34.4 million in 2002. TDS paid quarterly dividends of $0.165, $0.155 and $0.145 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. In February 2005, the TDS Board of Directors (the “TDS Board”) declared a $0.175 dividend per Common and Series A Common Share for the first quarter of 2005. TDS has no current plans to change its policy of paying dividends.

Stock Dividend

On February 17, 2005, the TDS Board unanimously approved a proposal (the “Special Common Share Proposal”), to be submitted to TDS shareholders at a special meeting of shareholders of TDS scheduled for April 11, 2005, to approve an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of TDS to increase the authorized number of Special Common Shares of TDS from 20,000,000 to 165,000,000.

On February 17, 2005, the TDS Board also approved a distribution of one Special Common Share in the form of a stock dividend with respect to each outstanding Common Share and Series A Common Share of TDS (the “Distribution”), which is expected to be effective May 13, 2005 to shareholders of record on April 29, 2005, subject to the approval of the Special Common Share Proposal by shareholders, the effectiveness of the Amendment, and certain other conditions.

Following approval and effectiveness of the Special Common Share Proposal, at some time in the future TDS may possibly offer to issue Special Common Shares in exchange for all of the Common Shares of U.S. Cellular which are not owned by TDS (a “Possible U.S. Cellular Transaction”).  TDS currently owns approximately 82% of the shares of common stock of U.S. Cellular.  A Possible U.S. Cellular Transaction would cause U.S. Cellular to become a wholly owned subsidiary of TDS.  TDS has set no time frame for a Possible U.S. Cellular Transaction and there are no assurances that a transaction will occur.

Contractual and Other Obligations

As of December 31, 2004, the resources required for scheduled repayment of contractual obligations were as follows:

	Payments due by Period
			Less than		2 – 3		4 – 5		More than
	Total		1 Year		Years		Years		5 Years
(Dollars in millions)
Long-term debt obligations (1)	$	2,013.4	$	38.8	$	245.5	$	53.7	$	1,675.4
Long-term debt interest	3,714.7		143.3		268.5		249.3		3,053.6
Forward contract obligations  (2)	1,754.1		—		738.7		1,015.4		—
Forward contract interest (3)	118.5		39.5		72.7		6.3		—
Operating leases  (4)	547.7		96.9		152.3		93.1		205.4
Purchase obligations  (5)(6)(7)	734.1		517.7		216.4		—		—
	$	8,882.5	$	836.2	$	1,694.1	$	1,417.8	$	4,934.4

(1)Scheduled debt repayments include long-term debt and the current portion of long-term debt. See Note 15 – Long-term Debt.

(2)Scheduled forward contract repayments include interest (unamortized discount) that has been or will be accreted up to the maturity date. See Note 15 – Long-term Debt.

(3)Interest amounts shown are for variable rate forward contracts based on the December 31, 2004 LIBOR rate plus 50 basis points. The three month LIBOR rate was 2.56% at December 31, 2004.

(4)Represents the amounts due under noncancellable, long-term operating leases for the periods specified. See Note 22 – Commitments and Contingencies. TDS has no material capital leases.

(5)Includes amounts payable under other agreements to purchase goods or services, including open purchase orders. Also includes obligations due under equipment vendor contracts. The amounts due in less than one year include estimated capital expenditures for U.S. Cellular. See Note 22 – Commitments and Contingencies.

(6)Includes $5.3 million for other post-retirement benefits expected to be paid in 2005. No amounts for other post-retirement benefits are included in periods beyond 2005 as these amounts are discretionary and have not yet been determined.

(7)Includes $121 million paid or to be paid to the FCC in 2005 related to Auction 58. See “Acquisitions, Exchanges and Divestitures.”

25

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

TDS has no transactions, agreements or contractual arrangements with unconsolidated entities involving “off-balance sheet arrangements,” as defined by SEC rules, that have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on financial condition, changes in financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, capital resources, revenues or expenses.

TDS has certain variable interests in investments in unconsolidated entities where TDS holds a minority interest. The investments in unconsolidated entities totaled $199.5 million as of December 31, 2004, and are accounted for using either the equity or cost method. TDS’s maximum loss exposure for these variable interests is limited to the aggregate carrying amount of the investments.

Indemnity Agreements.  TDS enters into agreements in the normal course of business that provide for indemnification of counterparties. These include certain asset sales and financings with other parties. The term of the indemnification varies by agreement. The events or circumstances that would require TDS to perform under these indemnities are transaction specific; however, these agreements may require TDS to indemnify the counterparty for costs and losses incurred from litigation or claims arising from the underlying transaction. TDS is unable to estimate the maximum potential liability for these types of indemnifications as the amounts are dependent on the outcome of future events, the nature and likelihood of which cannot be determined at this time. Historically, TDS has not made any significant indemnification payments under such agreements. TDS is party to an indemnity agreement with T-Mobile regarding certain contingent liabilities at Aerial Communications for the period prior to Aerial’s merger into VoiceStream Wireless in 2000. As of December 31, 2004, TDS has recorded liabilities of $9.3 million relating to this indemnity.

APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

TDS prepares its consolidated financial statement in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). TDS’s significant accounting policies are discussed in detail in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions and information that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Management believes the following reflect its more significant accounting policies and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements. TDS’s senior management has discussed the development of each of the following accounting policies and estimates and the following disclosures with the audit committee of the TDS board of directors.

Licenses and Goodwill

TDS reported $1,186.8 million of licenses and $843.4 million of goodwill at December 31, 2004, as a result of the acquisition of wireless licenses and markets, and the acquisition of operating telephone companies. In addition, TDS reported $42.0 million of license rights related to the licenses that will be received when the AT&T Wireless exchange transaction is fully completed.

See Note 5 – Licenses and Goodwill for a schedule of license and goodwill activity in 2004 and 2003.

Licenses and goodwill must be reviewed for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. TDS performs the annual impairment review on licenses and goodwill during the second quarter. There can be no assurance that upon review at a later date material impairment charges will not be required.

The intangible asset impairment test consists of comparing the fair value of the intangible asset to the carrying amount of the intangible asset. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference. The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process. The first step compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, the second step of the test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. To calculate the implied fair value of goodwill, an enterprise allocates the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that reporting unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value was the price paid to acquire the reporting unit. The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit is the implied fair value of goodwill. If the carrying amount exceeds the implied fair value, an impairment loss is recognized for that difference.

The fair value of an intangible asset and reporting unit goodwill is the amount at which that asset or reporting unit could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties. Therefore, quoted market prices in active markets are the best evidence of fair value and should be used when available. If quoted market prices are not available, the estimate of fair value is based on the best information available, including prices for similar assets and the use of other valuation techniques. Other valuation techniques include present value analysis, multiples of earnings or revenue or a similar performance measure. The use of these techniques involves assumptions by management about factors that are highly uncertain including future cash flows, the appropriate discount rate and other inputs. Different assumptions for these inputs or valuation methodologies could create materially different results.

U.S. Cellular tests goodwill for impairment at the level of reporting referred to as a reporting unit. U.S. Cellular has identified six reporting units pursuant to paragraph 30 of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” The six reporting units represent six geographic groupings of FCC licenses, constituting six geographic service areas. U.S. Cellular combines its FCC licenses into six units of accounting for purposes of testing the licenses for impairment pursuant to Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 02-7, “Unit of Accounting for Testing Impairment of Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets” (“EITF 02-7”), and SFAS No. 142, using the same geographic groupings as its reporting units. The divestitures of markets in 2004 resulted in the elimination of one of the six reporting units.

26

U.S. Cellular prepared valuations of each of the reporting units for purposes of goodwill impairment testing. A discounted cash flow approach was used to value each of the reporting units, using value drivers and risks specific to each individual geographic region. The cash flow estimates incorporate assumptions that market participants would use in their estimates of fair value. Key assumptions made in this process were the selection of a discount rate, estimated future cash flow levels, projected capital expenditures and selection of terminal value multiples.

U.S. Cellular also prepared valuations of similar groupings of FCC licenses (units of accounting pursuant to EITF 02-7) using an excess earnings methodology, through the use of a discounted cash flow approach. This excess earnings methodology estimates the fair value of the intangible assets (FCC license units of accounting) by measuring the future cash flows of the license groups, reduced by charges for contributory assets such as working capital, trademarks, existing subscribers, fixed assets, assembled workforce and goodwill.

TDS Telecom has recorded goodwill primarily as a result of the acquisition of operating telephone companies. TDS Telecom has assigned goodwill to its incumbent local exchange carrier reporting unit. This goodwill was valued using a multiple of cash flow valuation technique.

TDS Telecom’s competitive local exchange carrier has two reporting units for purposes of impairment testing as defined by SFAS No. 142; the larger reporting unit was valued using a market approach and the smaller reporting unit was valued using an income approach.  The market approach compares the reporting unit to similar companies whose securities are actively traded.  Ratios or multiples of value relative to certain significant financial measures, such as revenue and earnings, are developed based upon the comparable companies. The valuation multiples are applied to the appropriate financial measures of the reporting unit to indicate its value. The income approach uses a discounted cash flow analysis based on value drivers and risks specific to its reporting unit. The cash flow estimates incorporate assumptions that market participants would use in their estimates of fair value. Key assumptions made in this process were the selection of a discount rate, estimated future cash flow levels, projected capital expenditures and determination of terminal value.

In response to petitions filed by the Regional Bell Operating Company for increases in rates for certain wholesale services that it provides to competitive local exchange carriers, the state public service commissions of Illinois, Wisconsin and Michigan have issued orders that will adversely affect the cost of providing some services for TDS Telecom’s competitive local exchange carrier operations in those states, primarily services to residential customers and certain small business customers.  The pricing data for the major markets of the competitive local exchange carrier became available in the fourth quarter of 2004.  These pricing changes, as well as other regulatory changes and competitive pressures in 2004, triggered an impairment review by TDS Telecom of its competitive local exchange carrier operations’ tangible and intangible assets. As a result of the impairment review, TDS Telecom concluded that goodwill associated with the competitive local exchange carrier operations was impaired and recorded a loss on impairment of intangible assets of $29.4 million in the Statement of Operations.

TDS Telecom’s carrying value for the competitive local exchange carrier operations exceeded the fair value of such operations, thus requiring the second step of the goodwill test. Pursuant to the second step of the goodwill test, TDS Telecom allocated the fair value of the competitive local exchange carrier operations to all of the assets, including unrecognized intangible assets (e.g., the value of the customer list and trade names), and liabilities of such operations.  As a result of this allocation, there was no implied goodwill.  Therefore, the carrying amount of goodwill was charged to expense.

TDS recorded an impairment loss on licenses held by U.S. Cellular totaling $49.6 million in 2003 related to the impairment of two reporting units. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 142, TDS recorded an initial impairment loss on licenses held by U.S. Cellular of $10.4 million ($20.9 million net of income taxes

 of $8.2 million and minority interest of $2.3 million) as a cumulative effect of an accounting change.

In 2004 and 2003, U.S. Cellular recorded $1.8 million and $3.5 million license impairment losses, respectively, related to the investment in a non-operating market in Florida which was sold in December 2004 for $8.5 million, its approximate book value. This loss was recorded in gain (loss) on investments.  Also in 2003, U.S. Cellular reduced the carrying value of one of its cost method investments by $1.7 million based on a cash flow analysis of the investment. The investment charges above were recorded in loss on investments in the Statement of Operations.

There was no impairment of goodwill assigned to TDS Telecom’s incumbent local exchange carrier operations in 2004 and 2003. The carrying value of a wireless investment held by TDS Telecom exceeded the estimated fair value by approximately $5.0 million, and TDS Telecom recorded an impairment loss on goodwill in this reporting unit by that amount in 2003.

Asset Retirement Obligations

SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” was issued in June 2001, and became effective for TDS beginning January 1, 2003. SFAS No. 143 requires entities to record the fair value of a liability for legal obligations associated with an asset retirement in the period in which the obligations are incurred. When the liability is initially recorded, the entity capitalizes the cost of the asset retirement obligation by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, the liability is accreted to its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. Upon settlement of the obligations, any differences between the cost to retire an asset and the liability recorded is recognized in the Statement of Operations as a gain or loss.

U.S. Cellular is subject to asset retirement obligations associated primarily with its cell sites, retail sites and office locations.  Asset retirement obligations generally include costs to remediate leased land on which U.S. Cellular’s cell sites and switching offices are located. U.S. Cellular is also generally required to return leased retail store premises and office space to their pre-existing conditions.

27

The change in asset retirement obligations during 2004 and 2003 was as follows:

Year Ended December 31,	2004 (as restated)			2003 (as restated)
(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance	$	64,540		$	54,438
Additional liabilities accrued	5,426			5,680
Disposition of assets	(2,065		)	—
Accretion expense	4,674			4,422
Ending balance	$	72,575		$	64,540

TDS Telecom’s incumbent local exchange carriers’ rates are regulated by the respective state public utility commissions and the FCC and therefore, reflect the effects of the rate-making actions of these regulatory bodies in the financial statements of the TDS incumbent local exchange carriers. The incumbent local exchange carriers have recorded an asset retirement obligation in accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 143 and a regulatory liability for the costs of removal that these state public utility commissions have required to be recorded for regulatory accounting purposes which are in excess of the amounts required to be recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 143. These amounts combined make up the asset retirement obligation for the incumbent local exchange carriers.

The change in asset retirement obligation and regulatory obligation during 2004 and 2003 was as follows:

Year Ended December 31,	2004			2003
(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance	$	60,000		$	55,300
Additional liabilities incurred	6,057			5,600
Costs of removal	(1,057		)	(900		)
Ending balance	$	65,000		$	60,000

The regulatory liability included in asset retirement obligation at December 31, 2004 and 2003 was $31.1 million and $28.2 million, respectively. The asset retirement obligation calculated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 143 at December 31, 2004 and 2003 was $33.9 million and $31.8 million, respectively.

TDS Telecom’s competitive local telephone carriers adopted SFAS No. 143 effective January 1, 2003. TDS Telecom determined that its competitive local telephone carriers do not have a material legal obligation to remove long-lived assets as described by SFAS No. 143.

Property, Plant and Equipment

U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom’s competitive local exchange carrier operations provide for depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. U.S. Cellular depreciates its leasehold improvement assets associated with leased properties over periods ranging from three to ten years, which approximates the shorter of the assets’ economic lives or the specific lease terms, as defined in SFAS No. 13, “Accounting for Leases,” as amended. TDS Telecom’s incumbent local exchange carrier operations provide for depreciation on a group basis according to depreciable rates approved by state public utility commissions. Annually, U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom review its property, plant and equipment lives to ensure that the estimated useful lives are appropriate. The estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment is a critical accounting estimate because changing the lives of assets can result in larger or smaller charges for depreciation expense. Factors used in determining useful lives include technology changes, regulatory requirements, obsolescence and type of use.

In 2004, U.S. Cellular adjusted the useful lives of Time Division Multiple Access (“TDMA”) radio equipment, switch software and antenna equipment. TDMA radio equipment lives were adjusted to be fully depreciated by the end of 2008, which is the latest date the wireless industry will be required by regulation to support analog service. U.S. Cellular currently uses TDMA radio equipment to support analog service, and expects to have its digital radio network fully migrated to CDMA 1XRTT or some future generation of CDMA technology by that time. The useful lives for certain switch software were reduced to one year from three years and antenna equipment lives were reduced to seven years from eight years in order to better align the useful lives with the actual length of time the assets are in use. These changes increased depreciation by $14.9 million for 2004. The changes in useful lives reduced net income by $7.4 million, or $0.13 per diluted share, in the year ended December 31, 2004.

TDS Telecom did not change the useful lives of its property, plant and equipment in the year ended December 31, 2004.

In 2004, certain U.S. Cellular TDMA digital radio equipment consigned to a third party for future sale was taken out of service and was written down by $17.2 million prior to its consignment, increasing depreciation expense by that amount. This writedown was necessary to reduce the book value of the assets sold or to be sold to the proceeds received or expected to be received from their disposition.

In preparation for the implementation of a fixed asset management and tracking software system, including a bar code asset identification system, U.S. Cellular conducted a physical inventory review of its cell site fixed assets in 2004. As a result of the review, U.S. Cellular charged $11.9 million to depreciation expense for the write-off of certain assets.

TDS reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be fully recoverable. The tangible asset impairment test is a two-step process. The first step compares the carrying value of the assets with the undiscounted cash flows over the remaining asset life. If the carrying value of the assets is greater than the undiscounted cash flow, the second step of the test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss. The second step compares the estimated fair value of the assets to the carrying value of the assets. An impairment loss is recognized for the difference between the fair value of the assets (less costs to sell) and the carrying value of the assets.

The fair value of a tangible asset is the amount at which that asset could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties. Therefore, quoted market prices in active markets are the best evidence of fair value and should be used when available. If quoted market prices are not available, the estimate of fair value is based on the best information available, including prices for similar assets and the use of other valuation techniques. A present value analysis of cash flow scenarios is often the best available valuation technique with which to estimate the fair value of the long-lived asset. The use of this technique involves assumptions by management about factors that are highly uncertain including future cash flows, the appropriate discount rate and other inputs. Different assumptions for these inputs or valuation methodologies could create materially different results.

28

TDS Telecom’s competitive local exchange carrier has two asset groups for purposes of impairment testing; the larger asset group was valued using a market approach and the smaller asset group was valued using an income approach. The market approach compares the asset group to similar companies whose securities are actively traded. Ratios or multiples of value relative to certain significant financial measures, such as revenue and earnings, are developed based upon the comparable companies. The valuation multiples are applied to the appropriate financial measures of the asset group to indicate its value. The income approach uses a discounted cash flow analysis based on value drivers and risks specific to its asset group. The cash flow estimates incorporate assumptions that market participants would use in their estimates of fair value. Key assumptions made in this process were the selection of a discount rate, estimated future cash flow levels, projected capital expenditures and determination of terminal value.

As discussed previously under the Licenses and Goodwill caption under Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates, regulatory changes and competitive pressures in 2004 triggered an impairment review by TDS Telecom of its competitive local exchange carrier operations’ tangible assets. As a result of the impairment review, TDS Telecom concluded that the long-lived tangible assets of its competitive local exchange carrier operations were impaired and recorded a loss on impairment of intangible assets of $87.9 million in the Statement of Operations.

Income Taxes

The accounting for income taxes, the amounts of income tax assets and liabilities and the related income tax provision are critical accounting estimates because such amounts are significant to TDS’s financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of operations.

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires TDS to calculate a provision for income taxes. This process involves calculating the current income tax liability together with assessing temporary differences resulting from the different treatment of items, such as depreciation expense, for tax and accounting purposes as well as estimating the impact of potential adjustments to filed tax returns. These temporary differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within the consolidated Balance Sheet. TDS must then assess the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent management believes that recovery is not likely, establish a valuation allowance. Management judgment is required in determining the provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets.

TDS’s current net deferred tax asset totaled $43.9 million and $21.6 million, as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The current net deferred tax asset primarily represents the deferred tax effects of federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards expected to be utilized in 2005 and the allowance for doubtful accounts on customer receivables.

The temporary differences that gave rise to the noncurrent deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 are as follows:

December 31,	2004 (as restated)			2003 (as restated)
(Dollars in thousands)
Deferred Tax Asset
Net operating loss carryforwards	$	61,977		$	56,623
Derivative instruments	487,216			289,183
Other	38,815			49,692
	588,008			395,498
Less valuation allowance	(55,305		)	(43,006		)
Total Deferred Tax Asset	532,703			352,492
Deferred Tax Liability
Marketable equity securities	1,284,872			1,054,810
Property, plant and equipment	428,355			321,928
Partnership investments	66,432			56,277
Licenses	241,699			224,273
Total Deferred Tax Liability	2,021,358			1,657,288
Net Deferred Income Tax Liability	$	1,488,655		$	1,304,796

The deferred income tax liability relating to marketable equity securities totaled $1,284.9 million and $1,054.8 million, as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.  These amounts represent deferred income taxes calculated on the difference between the book basis and the tax basis of the marketable equity securities. Income taxes will be payable when TDS disposes of the marketable equity securities.

At December 31, 2004, TDS and certain subsidiaries had $1,102 million of state NOL carryforwards (generating a $56.1 million deferred tax asset) available to offset future taxable income primarily of the individual subsidiaries which generated the losses. The state NOL carryforwards expire between 2005 and 2024. Certain subsidiaries that are not included in the federal consolidated income tax return, but file separate federal tax returns, had federal NOL carryforwards (generating a $5.9 million deferred tax asset) available to offset future taxable income. The federal NOL carryforwards expire between 2005 and 2024. A valuation allowance was established for a portion of the state NOL carryforwards and the federal NOL carryforwards since it is more than likely that a portion of such carryforwards will expire before they can be utilized.

TDS is routinely subject to examination of its income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. TDS periodically assesses the likelihood of adjustments to its tax liabilities resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of its provision for income taxes, including related interest. TDS’s management judgment is required in assessing the eventual outcome of these examinations. Changes to such assessments affect the calculation of TDS’s income tax expense. As a result of the substantial completion of federal and state tax audits, TDS has reclassified $26 million from deferred liabilities and credits – other to accrued taxes in current liabilities.

29

Contingencies, Indemnities and Commitments

Contingent obligations, including indemnities, litigation and other possible commitments are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” which requires that an estimated loss be recorded if it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred at the date of the financial statements and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.  Accordingly, those contingencies that are deemed to be probable and where the amount of such settlement is reasonably estimable are accrued in the financial statements.  If only a range of loss can be determined, the best estimate within that range is accrued; if none of the estimates within that range is better than another, the low end of the range is accrued. Disclosure of a contingency is required if there is at least a reasonable possibility that a loss has been incurred, even if the amount is not estimable.  The assessment of contingencies is a highly subjective process that requires judgments about future events.  Contingencies are reviewed at least quarterly to determine the adequacy of the accruals and related financial statement disclosure. The ultimate settlement of contingencies may differ materially from amounts accrued in the financial statements.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

The following persons are partners of Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP, the principal law firm of TDS and its subsidiaries: Walter C.D. Carlson, a trustee and beneficiary of a voting trust that controls TDS, the nonexecutive chairman of the board and member of the board of directors of TDS and a director of U.S. Cellular; William S. DeCarlo, the General Counsel of TDS and an Assistant Secretary of TDS and certain subsidiaries of TDS; and Stephen P. Fitzell, the General Counsel of U.S. Cellular and/or an Assistant Secretary of certain subsidiaries of TDS. Walter C.D. Carlson does not provide legal services to TDS or its subsidiaries.

30

PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995 SAFE HARBOR CAUTIONARY STATEMENT

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other sections of this Annual Report contain statements that are not based on historical fact, including the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “expects” and similar words. These statements constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, events or developments to be significantly different from any future results, events or developments expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the following risks:

•Increases in the level of competition in the markets in which TDS operates, or wireless for wireline substitution, could adversely affect TDS’s revenues or increase its costs to compete.

•Consolidation in the wireless industry may create stronger competitors both operationally and financially which could adversely affect TDS’s revenues and increase its costs to compete.

•Advances or changes in telecommunications technology, such as Voice Over Internet Protocol, could render certain technologies used by TDS obsolete, could reduce TDS’s revenues or could increase TDS’s cost of doing business.

•Changes in the telecommunications regulatory environment, or a failure to timely or fully comply with any regulatory requirements, such as wireless number portability, local number portability and E-911 services, could adversely affect TDS’s financial condition, results of operations or ability to do business.

•Changes in the telecommunications regulatory environment, including the effects of potential changes in the rules governing universal service funding and potential changes in the amounts or methods of intercarrier compensation, could have an adverse effect on TDS’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

•Changes in U.S. Cellular’s enterprise value, changes in the supply or demand of the market for wireless licenses or telephone companies, adverse developments in the TDS businesses or the industries in which TDS is involved and/or other factors could require TDS to recognize impairments in the carrying value of TDS’s license costs, goodwill and/or physical assets.

•Early redemptions of debt or repurchases of debt, changes in prepaid forward contracts, operating leases, purchase obligations or other factors or developments could cause the amounts reported under Contractual Obligations in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis to be different from the amounts actually incurred.

•Changes in accounting standards or TDS’s accounting policies, estimates and/or in the assumptions underlying the accounting estimates, including those described under Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates, could have an adverse effect on TDS’s financial condition and results of operations.

•Settlements, judgments, restraints on its current or future manner of doing business and/or legal costs resulting from pending and future litigation could have an adverse effect on TDS’s financial condition, results of operations or ability to do business.

•Costs, integration problems or other factors associated with acquisitions/divestitures of properties and/or licenses could have an adverse effect on TDS’s financial condition or results of operations.

•Changes in prices, the number of customers, average revenue per unit, penetration rates, churn rates, selling expenses, net customer retention costs associated with wireless number portability and local number portability, roaming rates, access minutes of use, the mix of products and services offered or other business factors could have an adverse effect on TDS’s business operations.

•Changes in roaming partners’ rates for voice services and the lack of standards and roaming agreements for wireless data products could place U.S. Cellular’s service offerings at a disadvantage to those offered by other wireless carriers with more nationwide service territories, and could have an adverse effect on TDS’s operations.

•Changes in competitive factors with national and global wireless carriers could result in product and cost disadvantages and could have an adverse effect on TDS’s operations.

•Changes in guidance or interpretations of accounting requirements, changes in industry practice or changes in management assumptions could require amendments to or restatements of disclosures or financial information included in this or prior filings with the SEC.

•Uncertainty of access to capital for telecommunications companies, deterioration in the capital markets, other changes in market conditions, changes in TDS’s credit ratings or other factors could limit or restrict the availability of financing on terms and prices acceptable to TDS, which could require TDS to reduce its construction, development and acquisition programs.

•Changes in income tax rates, tax laws, regulations or rulings, or federal and state tax assessments could have an adverse effect on TDS’s financial condition and results of operations.

•War, conflicts, hostilities and/or terrorist attacks could have an adverse effect on TDS’s businesses.

•Changes in general economic and business conditions, both nationally and in the markets in which TDS operates, including difficulties by telecommunications companies, could have an adverse effect on TDS’s businesses.

•Changes in facts or circumstances, including new or additional information that affects the calculation of accrued liabilities for contingent obligations under guarantees, indemnities or otherwise, could require TDS to record charges in excess of amounts accrued on the financial statements, if any, which could have an adverse effect on TDS’s financial condition and results of operations.

•  A material weakness in the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting could result in inaccurate financial statements or other disclosures or permit fraud, which could have an adverse effect on TDS’s business, results of operations and financial condition. Assurance cannot be provided as to when such material weaknesses disclosed herein will be remediated.

•The possible development of adverse precedent in litigation or conclusions in professional studies to the effect that radio frequency emissions from handsets, wireless data devices and/or cell sites cause harmful health consequences, including cancer or tumors, or may interfere with various electronic medical devices such as pacemakers, could have an adverse effect on TDS’s wireless business operations, TDS’s financial condition and results of operations.

•Any of the foregoing events or other events could cause revenues, customer additions, operating income, capital expenditures and or any other financial or statistical information to vary from TDS’s forward estimates included in this report by a material amount.

TDS undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Readers should evaluate any statements in light of these important factors.

31

MARKET RISK

Long-Term Debt

TDS is subject to market risks due to fluctuations in interest rates and equity markets. The majority of TDS’s debt, excluding long-term debt related to the forward contracts, is in the form of long-term, fixed-rate notes with original maturities ranging up to 40 years. Accordingly, fluctuations in interest rates can lead to significant fluctuations in the fair value of such instruments. The long-term debt related to the forward contracts consists of both variable-rate debt and fixed-rate zero coupon debt. The variable-rate forward contracts require quarterly interest payments that are dependent on market interest rates. Increases in interest rates will result in increased interest expense. As of December 31, 2004, TDS had not entered into any significant financial derivatives to reduce its exposure to interest rate risks.

The following table presents the scheduled principal payments on long-term debt and forward contracts and the related weighted-average interest rates by maturity dates at December 31, 2004:

	Principal Payments Due by Period
(Dollars in millions)	Long-Term Debt Obligations (1)		Weighted-Avg. Interest Rates on Long-Term Debt Obligations (2)		Forward Contracts (3)		Weighted-Avg. Interest Rates on Forward Contracts (4)
2005	$	38.8	7.5	%	$	—	—	%
2006	222.9		6.9	%	—		—	%
2007	22.6		5.7	%	738.7		2.9	%
2008	22.5		5.7	%	1,015.4		3.4	%
2009	31.2		6.7	%	—		—	%
After 5 Years	1,675.4		7.3	%	—		—	%
Total	$	2,013.4	7.2	%	$	1,754.1	3.2	%

(1)Scheduled principal repayments include long-term debt and current portion of long-term debt.

(2)Represents the weighted-average interest rates at December 31, 2004, for debt maturing in the respective periods.

(3)Scheduled forward contract repayments include interest (unamortized discount) that has been or will be accreted up to the maturity date.

(4)Some of the forward contracts have a fixed interest rate, while others have a variable rate based on the LIBOR rate plus 50 basis points. The three-month LIBOR rate at December 31, 2004, was 2.56%.

At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the estimated fair value of long- term debt obligations was $2,122.6 million and $2,114.2 million, respectively, and the average interest rate on this debt was 7.2% and 7.1%, respectively. The fair value of long-term debt was estimated using market prices for TDS’s 7.6% Series A Notes and 7% senior notes and U.S. Cellular’s 8.75% senior notes, 7.5% senior notes, 6.7% senior notes and 6% Liquid Yield Option Notes, and discounted cash flow analysis for the remaining debt.

At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the estimated fair value of the forward contracts was $1,691.1 million and $1,679.5 million, respectively, and the average interest rate on this debt was 3.2% and 2.3%, respectively. The fair value of variable rate forward contracts, aggregating $1,295.3 million at December 31, 2004, approximates the carrying value due to the frequent repricing of these instruments. These contracts require quarterly interest payments at the LIBOR rate plus 50 basis points (the three-month LIBOR rate was 2.56% at December 31, 2004). The fair value of the fixed rate forward contracts, aggregating $395.8 million at December 31, 2004, was estimated based upon a discounted cash flow analysis. These contracts are structured as zero coupon obligations with a weighted average effective interest rate of 4.4% per year.

Marketable Equity Securities and Derivatives

TDS maintains a portfolio of available-for-sale marketable equity securities, the majority of which are the result of sales or trades of non-strategic assets. The market value of these investments aggregated $3,398.8 million at December 31, 2004, and $2,772.4 million at December 31, 2003. As of December 31, 2004, the unrealized holding gain, net of tax included in accumulated other comprehensive income totaled $1,109.2 million. This amount was $732.9 million at December 31, 2003. In 2002, TDS recognized, in the Statement of Operations, pre-tax losses of $1,757.5 million ($1,029.3 million, net of tax and minority interest of $728.2 million), related to investments in marketable equity securities as a result of management’s determination that unrealized losses with respect to the investments were other than temporary.

Subsidiaries of TDS and U.S. Cellular have entered into a number of forward contracts with counterparties related to the marketable equity securities that they hold. TDS and U.S. Cellular have provided guarantees to the counterparties which provide assurance that all principal and interest amounts are paid upon settlement of the contracts by such subsidiaries. The risk management objective of the forward contracts is to hedge the value of the marketable equity securities from losses due to decreases in the market prices of the securities (“downside limit”) while retaining a share of gains from increases in the market prices of such securities (“upside potential”). The downside limit is hedged at or above the cost basis thereby eliminating the risk of an other than temporary loss being recorded on these contracted securities.

Under the terms of the forward contracts, subsidiaries of TDS and U.S. Cellular will continue to own the contracted shares and will receive dividends paid on such contracted shares, if any. The forward contracts mature from May 2007 to September 2008 and, at TDS’s and U.S. Cellular’s option, may be settled in shares of the respective security or in cash, pursuant to formulas that “collar” the price of the shares. The collars effectively limit downside risk and upside potential on the contracted shares. The collars are typically adjusted for any changes in dividends on the contracted shares. If the dividend increases, the collar’s upside potential is typically reduced. If the dividend decreases, the collar’s upside potential is typically increased. If TDS and U.S. Cellular elect to settle in shares, they will be required to deliver the number of shares of the contracted security determined pursuant to the formula. If shares are delivered in the settlement of the forward contract, TDS and U.S. Cellular would incur a current tax liability at the time of delivery based on the difference between the tax basis of the marketable equity securities delivered and the net amount realized through maturity. If TDS and U.S. Cellular elect to settle in cash they will be required to pay an amount in cash equal to the fair market value of the number of shares determined pursuant to the formula.

Deferred taxes have been provided for the difference between the financial reporting basis and the income tax basis of the marketable equity securities and are included in deferred tax liabilities on the Balance Sheet. Such deferred tax liabilities totaled $1,284.9 million at December 31, 2004 and $1,054.8 million at December 31, 2003.

32

The following table summarizes certain facts surrounding the contracted securities as of December 31, 2004.

		Collar (1)
		Downside		Upside		Loan
		Limit		Potential		Amount
Security	Shares	(Floor)		(Ceiling)		(000s)
VeriSign	2,361,333	$	8.82	$	11.46	$	20,819
Vodafone (2)	12,945,915	$	15.07–$16.07	$	20.01–$22.60	201,038
Deutsche Telekom	131,461,861	$	10.74–$12.41	$	14.21–$17.17	1,532,257
						1,754,114
Unamortized debt discount						64,470
						$	1,689,644

(1)The per-share amounts represent the range of floor and ceiling prices of all the securities monetized.

(2)U.S. Cellular owns 10.2 million and TDS Telecom owns 2.7 million Vodafone American Depositary Receipts.

The following analysis presents the hypothetical change in the fair value of marketable equity securities and derivative instruments at December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, using the Black-Scholes model, assuming hypothetical price fluctuations of plus and minus 10%, 20% and 30%. The table presents hypothetical information as required by SEC rules. Such information should not be inferred to suggest that TDS has any intention of selling any marketable equity securities or canceling any derivative instruments.

(Dollars in millions)

	Valuation of investments assuming indicated increase
December 31, 2004	Fair Value			+10%			+20%			+30%
Marketable Equity Securities	$	3,398.8		$	3,738.7		$	4,078.6		$	4,418.4
Derivative Instruments (1)	$	(1,210.5	)	$	(1,544.8	)	$	(1,873.5	)	$	(2,206.5	)

	Valuation of investments assuming indicated decrease
December 31, 2004	Fair Value			-10%			-20%			-30%
Marketable Equity Securities	$	3,398.8		$	3,058.9		$	2,719.0		$	2,379.2
Derivative Instruments (1)	$	(1,210.5	)	$	(908.7	)	$	(608.8	)	$	(325.8	)

	Valuation of investments assuming indicated increase
December 31, 2003	Fair Value			+10%			+20%			+30%
Marketable Equity Securities	$	2,722.4		$	2,994.6		$	3,266.9		$	3,539.1
Derivative Instruments (1)	$	(712.3	)	$	(962.7	)	$	(1,218.5	)	$	(1,478.1	)

	Valuation of investments assuming indicated decrease
December 31, 2003	Fair Value			-10%			-20%			-30%
Marketable Equity Securities	$	2,722.4		$	2,450.2		$	2,177.9		$	1,905.7
Derivative Instruments (1)	$	(712.3	)	$	(467.0	)	$	(228.6	)	$	3.6

(1)Represents the fair value of the derivative instruments assuming the indicated increase or decrease in the underlying securities.

33

Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Year Ended December 31,	2004				2003				2002
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	(as restated)				(as restated)				(as restated)
Operating Revenues	$		3,703,920		$		3,455,174		$		3,012,547
Operating Expenses
Cost of services and products (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and accretion shown separately below)	1,323,928				1,200,978				979,988
Selling, general and administrative expense	1,380,718				1,293,853				1,133,347
Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense	670,731				598,336				512,931
Loss on impairment of intangible assets	29,440				49,595				—
Loss on impairment of long-lived assets	87,910				4,914				—
(Gain) loss on assets held for sale	(10,806			)	45,908				—
Total Operating Expenses	3,481,921				3,193,584				2,626,266
Operating Income	221,999				261,590				386,281
Investment and Other Income (Expense)
Investment income	64,900				52,179				43,799
Interest and dividend income	28,803				20,140				57,705
Gain (loss) on investments	38,209				(10,200			)	(1,888,391			)
Interest expense	(198,706			)	(171,391			)	(132,224			)
Minority interest in income of subsidiary trust	—				(16,678			)	(24,810			)
Other income (expense), net	(6,592			)	(13,880			)	986
Total Investment and Other Income (Expense)	(73,386			)	(139,830			)	(1,942,935			)
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes and Minority Interest	148,613				121,760				(1,556,654			)
Income tax expense (benefit)	59,251				58,262				(611,183			)
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations Before Minority Interest	89,362				63,498				(945,471			)
Minority share of income	(28,872			)	(17,979			)	(7,578			)
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations	60,490				45,519				(953,049			)
Discontinued operations, net of tax	6,362				(1,609			)	—
Income (Loss) Before Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change	66,852				43,910				(953,049			)
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax and minority interest	—				(11,789			)	(7,035			)
Net Income (Loss)	66,852				32,121				(960,084			)
Preferred dividend requirement	(203			)	(417			)	(427			)
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common	$		66,649		$		31,704		$		(960,511	)
Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding (000s)	57,296				57,721				58,644
Basic Earnings per Share
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations	$	1.05			$	0.78			$	(16.26		)
Discontinued Operations	0.11				(0.03			)	—
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change	—				(0.20			)	(0.12			)
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common	$	1.16			$	0.55			$	(16.38		)
Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding (000s)	57,567				57,875				58,644
Diluted Earnings per Share
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations	$	1.04			$	0.77			$	(16.26		)
Discontinued Operations	0.11				(0.03			)	—
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change	—				(0.20			)	(0.12			)
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common	$	1.15			$	0.54			$	(16.38		)
Dividends per Share	$	0.66			$	0.62			$	0.58

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

34

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31,	2004			2003			2002
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income (loss)	$	66,852		$	32,121		$	(960,084	)
Add (deduct) adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation, amortization and accretion	670,731			598,336			512,931
Bad debts expense	56,372			62,353			90,012
Deferred income taxes, net	44,706			9,078			(621,891		)
Investment income	(64,900		)	(52,179		)	(43,799		)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities	49,234			45,427			31,328
Minority share of income	28,872			17,979			7,578
Loss on impairment of intangible assets	29,440			49,595			—
Loss on impairment of long-lived assets	87,910			4,914			—
(Gain) loss on assets held for sale	(10,806		)	45,908			—
(Gain) loss on investments	(38,209		)	10,200			1,888,391
Discontinued operations	(6,362		)	1,609			—
Cumulative effect of accounting change	—			11,789			7,035
Noncash interest expense	24,764			26,760			11,407
Other noncash expense	16,793			33,621			14,103
Accreted interest on repayment of U.S. Cellular long-term debt	(68,056		)	—			—
Changes in assets and liabilities from operations
Change in accounts receivable	(92,110		)	(634		)	(117,717		)
Change in materials and supplies	(6,006		)	(16,548		)	2,473
Change in accounts payable	(19,927		)	(1,571		)	54,190
Change in customer deposits and deferred revenues	11,362			17,665			20,027
Change in accrued taxes	30,822			59,958			(80,106		)
Change in other assets and liabilities	(14,040		)	14,575			11,694
	797,442			970,956			827,572
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Additions to property, plant and equipment	(806,769		)	(776,037		)	(918,127		)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired	(40,786		)	(5,125		)	(529,726		)
Cash received from divestitures and exchanges, net of cash divested	247,565			33,953			—
FCC auction deposits	(9,000		)	—			56,060
Other investing activities	(5,590		)	3,166			(6,403		)
	(614,580		)	(744,043		)	(1,398,196		)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Issuance of notes payable	420,000			279,278			542,610
Issuance of long-term debt	422,642			434,294			138,314
Proceeds from forward contracts	—			—			1,631,821
Repayment of notes payable	(390,000		)	(739,278		)	(346,610		)
Repayment of Company-Obligated Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Securities	—			(300,000		)	—
Repayment of long-term debt	(376,397		)	(60,370		)	(148,470		)
Prepayment of medium-term notes	—			(70,500		)	(51,000		)
Stock options exercised	31,938			10,723			5,871
Repurchase of TDS Common Shares	(20,440		)	(86,779		)	—
Repurchase of U.S. Cellular Common Shares	(3,908		)	—			—
Dividends paid	(38,047		)	(36,193		)	(34,445		)
Other financing activities	1,877			(19,109		)	(7,462		)
	47,665			(587,934		)	1,730,629
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents	230,527			(361,021		)	1,160,005
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Beginning of year	940,578			1,301,599			141,594
End of year	$	1,171,105		$	940,578		$	1,301,599

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

35

Consolidated Balance Sheets – Assets

December 31,	2004		2003
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)		(as restated)
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,171,105	$	940,578
Accounts receivable
Due from customers, less allowance of $14,317 and $17,636, respectively	304,851		281,271
Other, principally connecting companies, less allowance of $3,170 and $6,419, respectively	134,458		131,214
Materials and supplies	91,556		87,270
Prepaid expenses	44,271		32,760
Deferred income tax asset	43,867		21,586
Other current assets	27,606		13,968
	1,817,714		1,508,647
Investments
Marketable equity securities	3,398,804		2,772,410
Licenses	1,186,764		1,189,326
License rights	42,037		42,037
Goodwill	843,387		908,065
Customer lists, net of accumulated amortization of $34,630 and $22,206, respectively	24,915		24,448
Investments in unconsolidated entities	199,518		211,178
Notes receivable, less valuation allowance of $55,144 and $55,144, respectively	4,885		6,476
Other investments	18,154		15,439
	5,718,464		5,169,379
Property, Plant and Equipment, net
U.S. Cellular	2,440,720		2,271,389
TDS Telecom	945,762		1,077,791
Corporate and other	32,962		29,468
	3,419,444		3,378,648
Other Assets and Deferred Charges	56,981		52,651
Assets of Operations Held for Sale	—		100,523
	$	11,012,603	$	10,209,848

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

36

Consolidated Balance Sheets –Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

December 31,	2004			2003
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)			(as restated)
Current Liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt	$	38,787		$	23,712
Notes payable	30,000			—
Accounts payable	327,497			361,115
Customer deposits and deferred revenues	119,196			108,929
Accrued interest	27,936			31,884
Accrued taxes	63,184			47,607
Accrued compensation	71,707			69,290
Other current liabilities	51,164			56,895
	729,471			699,432
Deferred Liabilities and Credits
Net deferred income tax liability	1,488,655			1,304,796
Derivative liability	1,210,500			712,252
Asset retirement obligation	137,575			124,540
Other deferred liabilities and credits	82,631			125,607
	2,919,361			2,267,195
Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt, excluding current portion	1,974,599			1,994,913
Forward contracts	1,689,644			1,672,762
	3,664,243			3,667,675
Liabilities of Operations Held for Sale	—			2,427
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 22)
Minority Interest in Subsidiaries	499,468			501,517
Preferred Shares	3,864			3,864
Common Stockholders’ Equity (Note 24)
Common Shares, par value $.01 per share; authorized 100,000,000 shares;
issued 56,377,000 and 56,282,000 shares, respectively	564			563
Special Common Shares, par value $.01 per share; authorized 20,000,000 shares;
no shares issued or outstanding	—			—
Series A Common Shares, par value $.01 per share; authorized 25,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 6,421,000 and 6,440,000 shares, respectively	64			64
Capital in excess of par value	1,822,541			1,843,468
Treasury Shares, at cost, 5,362,000 and 5,688,000 Common Shares, respectively	(449,173		)	(493,714		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income	370,857			294,818
Retained earnings	1,451,343			1,422,539
	3,196,196			3,067,738
	$	11,012,603		$	10,209,848

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

37

Consolidated Statements of Common Stockholders’ Equity

															Accumulated
			Series A			Capital in									Other
	Common		Common			Excess of			Treasury			Comprehensive			Comprehensive			Retained
(Dollars in thousands)	Shares		Shares			Par Value			Shares			Income (Loss)			Income (Loss)			Earnings
Balance, December 31, 2001	$	557	$	68		$	1,826,840		$	(406,894	)				$	(352,120	)	$	2,450,473
Effect of restatement on balance above	—		—			—			—						856			(29,333		)
Balance, December 31, 2001 (as restated)	557		68			1,826,840			(406,894		)				(351,264		)	2,421,140
Comprehensive Income (Loss):
Net (loss)	—		—			—			—			$	(960,084	)	—			(960,084		)
Net unrealized gains on securities	—		—			—			—			592,823			592,823			—
Net unrealized losses on derivative instruments	—		—			—			—			(49,868		)	(49,868		)	—
Comprehensive (loss)												$	(417,129	)
Dividends:
Common and Series A Common Shares	—		—			—			—						—			(34,018		)
Preferred Shares	—		—			—			—						—			(427		)
Dividend reinvestment, incentive and compensation plans	—		—			1,975			2,725						—			—
Conversion of Series A and Preferred Shares	2		(2		)	1,156			—						—			—
Adjust investment in U.S. Cellular for Common Share issuances and repurchases	—		—			2,698			—						—			—
Other	—		—			137			—						—			—
Balance, December 31, 2002 (as restated)	559		66			1,832,806			(404,169		)				191,691			1,426,611
Comprehensive Income (Loss):
Net income	—		—			—			—			$	32,121		—			32,121
Net unrealized gains on securities	—		—			—			—			491,345			491,345			—
Net unrealized losses on
derivative instruments	—		—			—			—			(388,218		)	(388,218		)	—
Comprehensive income												$	135,248
Dividends:
Common and Series A Common Shares	—		—			—			—						—			(35,792		)
Preferred Shares	—		—			—			—						—			(401		)
Repurchase of Common Shares	—		—			—			(92,365		)				—			—
Dividend reinvestment, incentive and compensation plans	1		—			5,029			2,820						—			—
Conversion of Series A and Preferred Shares	3		(2		)	2,939			—						—			—
Adjust investment in U.S. Cellular for Common Share issuances and repurchases	—		—			2,515			—						—			—
Other	—		—			179			—						—			—
Balance, December 31, 2003 (as restated)	563		64			1,843,468			(493,714		)				294,818			1,422,539
Comprehensive Income (Loss):
Net income	—		—			—			—			$	66,852		—			66,852
Net unrealized gains on securities	—		—			—			—			376,318			376,318			—
Net unrealized losses on
derivative instruments	—		—			—			—			(300,279		)	(300,279		)	—
Comprehensive income												$	142,891
Dividends:
Common and Series A Common Shares	—		—			—			—						—			(37,845		)
Preferred Shares	—		—			—			—						—			(203		)
Repurchase of Common Shares	—		—			—			(14,854		)				—			—
Dividend reinvestment, incentive and compensation plans	1		—			(27,459		)	59,395						—			—
Adjust investment in subsidiaries for Common Share issuances and repurchases	—		—			4,604			—						—			—
Other	—		—			1,928			—						—			—
Balance, December 31, 2004 (as restated)	$	564	$	64		$	1,822,541		$	(449,173	)				$	370,857		$	1,451,343

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

38

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Operations

Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. (“TDS”) is a diversified telecommunications company providing high-quality telecommunications services to approximately 6.1 million wireless telephone customers and wireline telephone equivalent access lines in 36 states at December 31, 2004. TDS conducts substantially all of its wireless telephone operations through its 82.0%-owned subsidiary, United States Cellular Corporation (“U.S. Cellular”) and its incumbent local exchange carrier and competitive local exchange carrier wireline telephone operations through its wholly owned subsidiary, TDS Telecommunications Corporation (“TDS Telecom”). TDS conducts printing and distribution services through its 80%-owned subsidiary, Suttle Straus, which represents a small portion of TDS’s operations.

See Note 25–Business Segment Information for summary financial information on each business segment.

Restatement

TDS and its audit committee concluded on November 9, 2005, that TDS would amend its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 to restate its financial statements and financial information for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 including quarterly information for 2004 and 2003, and certain selected financial data for the years 2001 and 2000. TDS and its audit committee also concluded that TDS would amend its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periods ended March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2005 to restate the financial statements and financial information included therewith.

On November 11, 2005, TDS and U.S. Cellular announced that the staff of the Midwest Regional Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) had advised both companies that it was conducting an investigation into the restatement of financial statements announced by TDS and U.S. Cellular on November 10, 2005.  TDS and U.S. Cellular intend to cooperate fully with the SEC staff in this investigation.

The restatement adjustments principally correct items that were recorded in the financial statements previously but not in the proper periods and certain income tax, interest income and consolidation errors. Correction of the errors, with the exception of income taxes discussed below, individually did not have a material impact on income before income taxes and minority interest, net income or earnings per share; however, when aggregated, the items were considered to be material. The restatement adjustments to correct income tax accounting had a material impact individually on net income and earnings per share in prior periods. The restated financial statements are adjusted to record certain obligations in the periods such obligations were incurred, correct the timing of the reversal of certain tax liabilities, correct the consolidation of an 80% owned subsidiary, and record revenues in the periods such revenues were earned. The adjustments are described below.

•      Income taxes – In the restatement, TDS corrected its income tax expense, federal and state taxes payable, liabilities accrued for tax contingencies, deferred income tax assets and liabilities and related disclosures for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 for items identified based on a reconciliation of income tax accounts.  The reconciliation compared amounts used for financial reporting purposes to the amounts used in the preparation of the income tax returns, and took into consideration the results of federal and state income tax audits and the resulting book/tax basis differences which generate deferred tax assets and liabilities.  In addition, a review of the state deferred income tax rates used to establish deferred income tax assets and liabilities identified errors in the state income tax rate used which resulted in adjustments to correct the amount of deferred income tax assets and liabilities recorded for temporary differences between the timing of when certain transactions are recognized for financial and income tax reporting.

•Federal universal service fund (“USF”) contributions – In 2004 and 2003, Universal Service Administrative Company (“USAC”) billings to U.S. Cellular for USF contributions were based on estimated revenues reported to USAC by U.S. Cellular in accordance with USAC’s established procedures. However, U.S. Cellular’s actual liability for USF is based upon its actual revenues and USAC’s established procedures provide a method to adjust U.S. Cellular’s estimated liability to its actual liability. In the first six months of 2005 and the full years of 2004 and 2003, U.S. Cellular’s actual revenues exceeded estimated revenues reported to USAC on an interim basis. As a result, additional amounts were due to USAC in 2005 and 2004 based on U.S. Cellular’s annual report filings. Such additional amounts were incorrectly expensed when the invoices were received from USAC rather than at the time the obligation was incurred. In the third quarter of 2005, U.S. Cellular corrected its accounting for USF contributions to record expense reflecting the estimated obligation incurred based on actual revenues reported during the period. Accordingly, in the restatement, TDS has adjusted previously reported USF contributions expense by U.S. Cellular to reflect the estimated liability incurred during the period.

•Customer contract termination fees – In the fourth quarter of 2003, U.S. Cellular revised its business practices related to the billing of contract termination fees charged when a customer disconnected service prior to the end of the customer’s contract. This change resulted in an increase in amounts billed to customers and revenues even though a high percentage of the amounts billed were deemed uncollectible. At the time of the change in business practice, U.S. Cellular incorrectly recorded revenues related to such fees at the time of billing, as generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) would preclude revenue recognition if the receivable is not reasonably assured of collection. In the first quarter of 2005, U.S. Cellular corrected its accounting to record revenues related to such fees only upon collection, in recognition of the fact that the collectibility of the revenues was not reasonably assured at the time of billing. In the restatement, TDS made adjustments to properly reflect U.S. Cellular’s revenues for such fees upon collection beginning on October 1, 2003.

39

•      Leases and contracts – TDS and U.S. Cellular had entered into certain operating leases (as both lessee and lessor) that provide for specific scheduled increases in payments over the lease term. In the third quarter of 2004, TDS made adjustments for the cumulative effect which were not considered to be material to either that quarter or to prior periods to correct its accounting and to recognize revenues and expenses under such agreements on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 13, “Accounting for Leases,” as amended, and related pronouncements. In addition, the accounting for certain other long-term contracts, for which a cumulative effect adjustment was made in the first quarter of 2005, was corrected to recognize expenses in the appropriate periods. The restatement adjustments reverse the cumulative amounts previously recorded in the third quarter of 2004 and the first quarter of 2005, and properly record such revenues and expenses on a straight-line basis in the appropriate periods.

•Promotion rebates – From time to time, U.S. Cellular’s sales promotions include rebates on sales of handsets to customers. In such cases, U.S. Cellular reduces revenues and records a liability at the time of sale reflecting an estimate of rebates to be paid under the promotion. Previously, the accrued liability was not adjusted on a timely basis upon expiration of the promotion to reflect the actual amount of rebates paid based upon information available at the date the financial statements were issued. In the restatement, TDS has corrected revenues and accrued liabilities to reflect the impacts associated with promotion rebates in the appropriate periods.

•Operations of consolidated partnerships managed by a third party – Historically, U.S. Cellular recorded the results of operations of certain consolidated partnerships managed by a third party on an estimated basis, and adjusted such estimated results to the actual results upon receipt of financial statements in the following quarter. However, GAAP requires that the actual amounts be used. In the restatement, TDS has corrected its financial statements to recognize results of operations in the appropriate period based on the partnerships’ actual results of operations reported for such periods.

•Investment income from entities accounted for by the equity method – Historically, U.S. Cellular recorded an estimate each quarter of its proportionate share of net income (loss) from certain entities accounted for by the equity method, and adjusted such estimate to the actual share of net income (loss) upon receipt of financial statements in the following quarter. However, GAAP requires that actual amounts be used. In the restatement, TDS has corrected its financial statements to recognize investment income in the appropriate period based on the entities’ actual net income (loss) reported for such periods.

•      Historically, TDS had not fully consolidated its 80%-owned subsidiary, Suttle Straus, to present the operating results of such subsidiary in revenues, cost of service, selling, general and administrative expenses and depreciation. Previously, the net operating results of the subsidiary were included in other income (expense).  However, the non-operating portion of the income statement of Suttle Straus was properly presented. The restatement correctly consolidated the results of Suttle Straus. Also, property, plant and equipment was corrected to properly include Suttle Straus’ fixed assets.  Previously, the balances were included in other assets and deferred charges. In addition, certain intercompany elimination entries between TDS, U.S. Cellular, TDS Telecom and Suttle Straus have been recorded.

•Revenue and cost of service accruals – TDS Telecom reviewed accruals in the first and second quarter of 2004 and determined that an adjustment was required to record unbilled revenue related to its competitive local exchange carrier that were not previously recorded. TDS Telecom also reduced cost of service accruals related to long-distance service as a result of shifting long-distance traffic to a second provider. In the restatement, the adjustments reverse the cumulative amounts previously recorded in the first and second quarters of 2004, and record such revenues and expenses in the appropriate periods.

•      Consolidated statements of cash flows – In the restatement, the classification of cash distributions received from unconsolidated entities has been corrected to properly reflect cash received, which represents a return on investment in the unconsolidated entities, as cash flows from operating activities; previously, the cash received on such investments was classified as cash flows from investing activities. Also, the classification of certain noncash stock-based compensation expense has been corrected to properly reflect such noncash expense as an adjustment to cash flows from operating activities; previously, such expense was classified as cash flows from financing activities.

•Interest income – In the restatement, TDS corrected its accounting for recording interest income earned by its subsidiaries through a cash management agreement for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002. TDS subsidiaries participating in the cash management agreement had not recorded an accrual to increase cash and interest income for their portion of the interest income earned. The correcting entries increased cash and interest income for each period presented.

•Other items – In addition to the adjustments described above, TDS recorded a number of other adjustments to correct and record revenues and expenses in the periods in which such revenues and expenses were earned or incurred. These adjustments were not significant, either individually or in aggregate.

40

The table below summarizes the impact on income from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest as a result of the restatement.

										Prior to
	2004			2003			2002			2002
	(Increase (decrease) dollars in thousands)
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes and Minority Interest, as previously reported	$	149,346		$	130,736		$	(1,555,669	)
Federal universal service fund contributions	2,973			(4,620		)	—			$	—
Customer contract termination fees	(599		)	(2,992		)	—			—
Leases and contracts	3,974			(2,878		)	(1,223		)	(2,553		)
Promotion rebates	1,027			—			—			—
Operations of consolidated partnerships managed by a third party	1,183			(245		)	(539		)	(147		)
Investment income from entities accounted for by the equity method	(3,368		)	(975		)	124			(2,352		)
Revenue and cost of service accruals	(5,702		)	3,466			564			1,672
Interest Income	1,098			274			380			632
Other items	(1,319		)	(1,006		)	(291		)	(1,385		)
Total adjustment	(733		)	(8,976		)	(985		)	$	(4,133	)
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes and Minority Interest, as restated	$	148,613		$	121,760		$	(1,556,654	)

The table below summarizes the impact on net income and earnings per share as a result of the restatement.

	2004						2003						2002						Prior to 2002
	Net Income (loss)			Diluted Earnings Per Share			Net Income (loss)			Diluted Earnings Per Share			Net Income (loss)			Diluted Earnings Per Share			Net Income (loss)
	(Increase (decrease) dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
As previously reported	$	49,004		$	0.84		$	46,608		$	0.79		$	(994,772	)	$	(16.97	)
Federal universal service fund contributions	1,325			0.02			(2,072		)	(0.04		)	—			—			$	—
Customer contract termination fees	(279		)	—			(1,374		)	(0.02		)	—			—			—
Leases and contracts	2,172			0.04			(1,467		)	(0.03		)	(635		)	(0.01		)	(1,390		)
Promotion rebates	479			0.01			—			—			—			—			—
Operations of consolidated partnerships managed by a third party	430			—			(90		)	—			(192		)	—			(57		)
Investment income from entities accounted for by the equity method	(1,672		)	(0.03		)	(485		)	(0.01		)	62			—			(1,173		)
Revenue and cost of service accruals	(3,449		)	(0.06		)	2,097			0.04			342			—			1,012
Income taxes	18,921			0.33			(10,686		)	(0.18		)	35,051			0.60			(26,939		)
Interest income	664			0.01			165			—			230			—			383
Other items	(743		)	(0.01		)	(575		)	(0.01		)	(170		)	—			(1,169		)
Total adjustment	17,848			0.31			(14,487		)	(0.25		)	34,688			0.59			$	(29,333	)
As restated	$	66,852		$	1.15		$	32,121		$	0.54		$	(960,084	)	$	(16.38	)

41

The table below summarizes the effects of consolidating Suttle Straus and recording certain intercompany eliminations as previously discussed.

Year Ended December 31,	2004						2003						2002
	Adjustment for			Intercompany			Adjustment for			Intercompany			Adjustment for			Intercompany
	Suttle Straus			Eliminations			Suttle Straus			Eliminations			Suttle Straus			Eliminations
(Increase (decrease) dollars in thousands)
Operating Revenues	$	27,269		$	(11,695	)	$	26,745		$	(12,313	)	$	24,136		$	(11,994	)
Operating Expenses
Cost of services and products	18,044			939			17,870			311			16,111			—
Selling, general and administrative	5,110			(12,634		)	4,859			(12,624		)	4,877			(11,994		)
Depreciation, amortization and accretion	2,515			—			2,438			—			2,045			—
Total Operating Expenses	25,669			(11,695		)	25,167			(12,313		)	23,033			(11,994		)
Operating Income	1,600			—			1,578			—			1,103			—
Other income (expense), net	(1,600		)	—			(1,578		)	—			(1,103		)	—
Investment and Other Income (expense)	(1,600		)	—			(1,578		)	—			(1,103		)	—
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes and Minority Interest	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—

42

The effect of the restatement on the previously reported Consolidated Statements of Operations is as follows:

	2004						2003						2002
Year Ended December 31,	As Previously Reported			As Restated			As Previously Reported			As Restated			As Previously Reported			As Restated
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Operating Revenues	$	3,720,389		$	3,703,920		$	3,445,216		$	3,455,174		$	2,998,474		$	3,012,547
Operating Expenses
Cost of services and products (excluding depreciation, amortization and accretion shown separately below)	1,304,171			1,323,928			1,182,885			1,200,978			962,760			979,988
Selling, general and administrative	1,420,967			1,380,718			1,298,294			1,293,853			1,138,914			1,133,347
Depreciation, amortization and accretion	667,956			670,731			595,732			598,336			510,445			512,931
Loss on impairment of intangible assets	29,440			29,440			49,595			49,595			—			—
Loss on impairment of long-lived assets	87,910			87,910			4,914			4,914			—			—
(Gain) loss on assets held for sale	(10,806		)	(10,806		)	45,908			45,908			—			—
Total Operating Expenses	3,499,638			3,481,921			3,177,328			3,193,584			2,612,119			2,626,266
Operating Income	220,751			221,999			267,888			261,590			386,355			386,281
Investment and Other Income (Expense)
Investment income	69,623			64,900			53,154			52,179			43,675			43,799
Interest and dividend income	27,755			28,803			19,918			20,140			57,330			57,705
Gain (loss) on investments	36,854			38,209			(10,200		)	(10,200		)	(1,888,391		)	(1,888,391		)
Interest expense	(198,706		)	(198,706		)	(171,391		)	(171,391		)	(132,224		)	(132,224		)
Minority interest in income of subsidiary trust	—			—			(16,678		)	(16,678		)	(24,810		)	(24,810		)
Other income (expense), net	(6,931		)	(6,592		)	(11,955		)	(13,880		)	2,396			986
Investment and Other Income (Expense)	(71,405		)	(73,386		)	(137,152		)	(139,830		)	(1,942,024		)	(1,942,935		)
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes and Minority Interest	149,346			148,613			130,736			121,760			(1,555,669		)	(1,556,654		)
Income tax expense (benefit)	78,651			59,251			50,350			58,262			(577,000		)	(611,183		)
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations before Minority Interest	70,695			89,362			80,386			63,498			(978,669		)	(945,471		)
Minority Share of Income	(28,053		)	(28,872		)	(20,380		)	(17,979		)	(9,068		)	(7,578		)
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations	42,642			60,490			60,006			45,519			(987,737		)	(953,049		)
Discontinued Operations, net of tax	6,362			6,362			(1,609		)	(1,609		)	—			—
Income (Loss) before Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change	49,004			66,852			58,397			43,910			(987,737		)	(953,049		)
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change, net of tax and minority interest	—			—			(11,789		)	(11,789		)	(7,035		)	(7,035		)
Net Income (Loss)	49,004			66,852			46,608			32,121			(994,772		)	(960,084		)
Preferred dividend requirement	(203		)	(203		)	(417		)	(417		)	(427		)	(427		)
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common	$	48,801		$	66,649		$	46,191		$	31,704		$	(995,199	)	$	(960,511	)
Basic Earnings per Share:
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations	$	0.74		$	1.05		$	1.03		$	0.78		$	(16.85	)	$	(16.26	)
Discontinued Operations	0.11			0.11			(0.03		)	(0.03		)	—			—
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change	—			—			(0.20		)	(0.20		)	(0.12		)	(0.12		)
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common	$	0.85		$	1.16		$	0.80		$	0.55		$	(16.97	)	$	(16.38	)
Diluted Earnings per Share:
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations	$	0.73		$	1.04		$	1.02		$	0.77		$	(16.85	)	$	(16.26	)
Discontinued Operations	0.11			0.11			(0.03		)	(0.03		)	—			—
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change	—			—			(0.20		)	(0.20		)	(0.12		)	(0.12		)
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common	$	0.84		$	1.15		$	0.79		$	0.54		$	(16.97	)	$	(16.38	)

43

The effect of the restatement on the previously reported Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows is as follows:

	2004			2004			2003			2003			2002			2002
(Dollars in thousands)	As Previously Reported			As Restated			As Previously Reported			As Restated			As Previously Reported			As Restated
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income (loss)	$	49,004		$	66,852		$	46,608		$	32,121		$	(994,772	)	$	(960,084	)
Add (deduct) adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation, amortization and accretion	667,956			670,731			595,732			598,336			510,445			512,931
Bad debts expense	—			56,372			—			62,353			—			90,012
Deferred income taxes	62,305			44,706			3,368			9,078			(587,706		)	(621,891		)
Investment income	(69,623		)	(64,900		)	(53,154		)	(52,179		)	(43,675		)	(43,799		)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities	—			49,234			—			45,427			—			31,328
Minority share of income	28,053			28,872			20,380			17,979			9,068			7,578
Loss on impairment of intangible assets	29,440			29,440			49,595			49,595			—			—
Loss on impairment of long-lived assets	87,910			87,910			4,914			4,914			—			—
Gain (loss) on assets held for sale	(10,806		)	(10,793		)	45,908			45,908			—			—
Gain (loss) on investments	(36,854		)	(38,209		)	10,200			10,200			1,888,391			1,888,391
Discontinued operations	(6,362		)	(6,362		)	1,609			1,609			—			—
Cumulative effect of accounting change	—			—			11,789			11,789			7,035			7,035
Noncash interest expense	24,764			24,764			26,760			26,760			11,407			11,407
Other noncash expense	21,002			16,793			28,676			33,621			15,349			14,103
Accreted interest on repayment of U.S. Cellular long-term debt	(68,056		)	(68,056		)	—			—			—			—
Changes in assets and liabilities
Change in accounts receivable	(39,317		)	(92,110		)	61,338			(634		)	(27,032		)	(117,717		)
Change in materials and supplies	(6,006		)	(6,006		)	(16,548		)	(16,548		)	2,473			2,473
Change in accounts payable	(24,063		)	(19,927		)	(625		)	(1,571		)	52,280			54,190
Change in customer deposits and deferred revenues	12,103			11,362			17,282			17,665			20,046			20,027
Change in accrued taxes	32,606			30,822			57,762			59,958			(80,108		)	(80,106		)
Change in other assets and liabilities	(6,667		)	(14,040		)	8,819			14,575			10,436			11,694
	747,389			797,442			920,413			970,956			793,637			827,572
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Additions to property, plant and equipment	(798,252		)	(806,769		)	(776,967		)	(776,037		)	(899,050		)	(918,127		)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired	(40,786		)	(40,786		)	(5,125		)	(5,125		)	(531,174		)	(529,726		)
Cash received from divestitures and exchanges, net of cash divested	247,565			247,565			33,953			33,953			—			—
FCC auction deposits	(9,000		)	(9,000		)	—			—			56,060			56,060
Distributions from unconsolidated entities	49,234			—			45,427			—			31,328			—
Other investing activities	(13,133		)	(5,590		)	2,222			3,166			(23,748		)	(6,403		)
	(564,372		)	(614,580		)	(700,490		)	(744,043		)	(1,366,584		)	(1,398,196		)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Issuance of notes payable	420,000			420,000			279,278			279,278			542,610			542,610
Issuance of long-term debt	422,642			422,642			434,294			434,294			138,314			138,314
Proceeds from forward contracts	—			—			—			—			1,631,821			1,631,821
Repayment of notes payable	(390,000		)	(390,000		)	(739,278		)	(739,278		)	(346,610		)	(346,610		)
Repayment of Company-Obligated Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Securities	—			—			(300,000		)	(300,000		)	—			—
Repayment of long-term debt	(376,397		)	(376,397		)	(60,370		)	(60,370		)	(148,470		)	(148,470		)
Prepayment of medium-term notes	—			—			(70,500		)	(70,500		)	(51,000		)	(51,000		)
Stock options exercised	31,938			31,938			10,723			10,723			5,871			5,871
Repurchase of TDS Common Shares	(20,440		)	(20,440		)	(86,779		)	(86,779		)	—			—
Repurchase of U.S. Cellular Common Shares	(3,908		)	(3,908		)	—			—			—			—
Dividends paid	(38,047		)	(38,047		)	(36,193		)	(36,193		)	(34,445		)	(34,445		)
Other financing activities	2,125			1,877			(12,383		)	(19,109		)	(6,952		)	(7,462		)
	47,913			47,665			(581,208		)	(587,934		)	1,731,139			1,730,629
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents	230,930			230,527			(361,285		)	(361,021		)	1,158,192			1,160,005
Cash and Cash Equivalents -
Beginning of period	937,651			940,578			1,298,936			1,301,599			140,744			141,594
End of period	$	1,168,581		$	1,171,105		$	937,651		$	940,578		$	1,298,936		$	1,301,599

44

The effect of the restatement on the previously reported Consolidated Balance Sheets is as follows:

	2004						2003
December 31,	As Previously Reported			As Restated			As Previously Reported			As Restated
(Dollars in thousands)
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,168,581		$	1,171,105		$	937,651		$	940,578
Accounts receivable
Due from customers, less allowance	308,410			304,851			282,313			281,271
Other, principally connecting companies, less allowance	131,665			134,458			127,358			131,214
Materials and supplies	91,556			91,556			87,270			87,270
Prepaid expenses	44,014			44,271			32,766			32,760
Deferred income tax asset	36,040			43,867			19,396			21,586
Other current assets	29,951			27,606			18,192			13,968
	1,810,217			1,817,714			1,504,946			1,508,647
Investments
Marketable equity securities	3,398,804			3,398,804			2,772,410			2,772,410
Licenses	1,186,764			1,186,764			1,189,326			1,189,326
License rights	42,037			42,037			42,037			42,037
Goodwill	823,259			843,387			887,937			908,065
Customer lists, net of accumulated amortization	24,915			24,915			24,448			24,448
Investments in unconsolidated entities	206,763			199,518			214,885			211,178
Notes receivable, less valuation allowance	4,885			4,885			6,476			6,476
Other investments	18,154			18,154			15,439			15,439
	5,705,581			5,718,464			5,152,958			5,169,379
Property, Plant and Equipment, net
U.S. Cellular	2,439,719			2,440,720			2,271,254			2,271,389
TDS Telecom	945,762			945,762			1,079,732			1,077,791
Corporate and other	—			32,962			—			29,468
	3,385,481			3,419,444			3,350,986			3,378,648
Other Assets and Deferred Charges	92,562			56,981			83,925			52,651
Assets of Operations Held for Sale	—			—			100,523			100,523
Total Assets	$	10,993,841		$	11,012,603		$	10,193,338		$	10,209,848
Current Liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt	$	38,787		$	38,787		$	23,712		$	23,712
Notes payable	30,000			30,000			—			—
Accounts payable	323,256			327,497			361,010			361,115
Customer deposits and deferred revenues	119,380			119,196			108,372			108,929
Accrued interest	27,936			27,936			31,884			31,884
Accrued taxes	76,266			63,184			46,107			47,607
Accrued compensation	71,707			71,707			69,290			69,290
Other current liabilities	53,991			51,164			56,570			56,895
	741,323			729,471			696,945			699,432
Deferred Liabilities and Credits
Net deferred income tax liability	1,466,649			1,488,655			1,285,024			1,304,796
Derivative liability	1,210,500			1,210,500			712,252			712,252
Asset retirement obligation	137,534			137,575			124,501			124,540
Other deferred liabilities and credits	79,674			82,631			119,076			125,607
	2,894,357			2,919,361			2,240,853			2,267,195
Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt, excluding current portion	1,974,599			1,974,599			1,994,913			1,994,913
Forward contracts	1,689,644			1,689,644			1,672,762			1,672,762
	3,664,243			3,664,243			3,667,675			3,667,675
Liabilities of Operations Held for Sale	—			—			2,427			2,427
Minority Interest in Subsidiaries	499,306			499,468			502,702			501,517
Preferred Shares	3,864			3,864			3,864			3,864
Common Stockholders’ Equity
Common Shares, par value $.01 per share	564			564			563			563
Special Common Shares, par value $.01 per share	—			—			—			—
Series A Common Shares, par value $.01 per share	64			64			64			64
Capital in excess of par value	1,823,161			1,822,541			1,843,468			1,843,468
Treasury Shares, at cost	(449,173		)	(449,173		)	(493,714		)	(493,714		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income	373,505			370,857			296,820			294,818
Retained earnings	1,442,627			1,451,343			1,431,671			1,422,539
	3,190,748			3,196,196			3,078,872			3,067,738
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	10,993,841		$	11,012,603		$	10,193,338		$	10,209,848

45

Principles of Consolidation

The accounting policies of TDS conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of TDS, its majority-owned subsidiaries since acquisition, the wireless partnerships in which it has a majority general partnership interest and any entity where TDS has a variable interest that will absorb a majority of the entity’s expected gains or losses, or both. All material intercompany items have been eliminated.

TDS adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 46R (“FIN 46R”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” in January 2004. The adoption of FIN 46R did not have a material impact on TDS’s financial position or results of operations.

Business Combinations

TDS uses the purchase method of accounting for business combinations. TDS includes as investments in subsidiaries the value of the consideration given and all direct and incremental costs relating to acquisitions. All costs relating to unsuccessful negotiations for acquisitions are charged to expense.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect (a) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and (b) the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts reported in prior years have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation. The reclassifications had no impact on previously reported net income and stockholders’ equity.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash and those short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.

Outstanding checks totaled $19.3 million and $22.3 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and are classified as accounts payable in the consolidated Balance Sheets.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

U.S. Cellular’s accounts receivable primarily consist of amounts owed by customers for both service provided and equipment sales, by agents for equipment sales, by other wireless carriers whose customers have used U.S. Cellular’s wireless systems and by unaffiliated third-party partnerships or corporations pursuant to equity distribution declarations.

TDS Telecom’s accounts receivable primarily consist of amounts owed by customers for services provided, by connecting companies for carrying interstate and intrastate long-distance traffic on its network, and by interstate and intrastate revenue pools that distribute access charges.

The allowance for doubtful accounts is the best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the existing accounts receivable.  The allowance is based on historical write-off experience.  Account receivable balances are reviewed on either an aggregate basis or individual basis for collectibility depending on the type of receivable.  When it is probable the account balance will not be collected, the account balance is charged off against the allowance for the doubtful accounts.  TDS does not have any off-balance sheet credit exposure related to its customers.

The changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts during the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were as follows:

Year Ended December 31,	2004			2003			2002
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)
Beginning Balance	$	24,055		$	40,313		$	13,459
Additions, net of recoveries	56,372			62,353			90,012
Deductions	(62,940		)	(78,611		)	(63,158		)
Ending Balance	$	17,487		$	24,055		$	40,313

Materials and Supplies

U.S. Cellular’s inventory, primarily handsets and accessories, is stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined using the first-in, first-out method. TDS Telecom’s materials and supplies are stated at average cost.

Marketable Equity Securities

Marketable equity securities are classified as available-for-sale, and are stated at fair market value. Net unrealized holding gains and losses are included in accumulated other comprehensive income. Realized gains and losses are determined on the basis of specific identification.

The market values of marketable equity securities may fall below the accounting cost basis of such securities. If management determines the decline in value to be other than temporary, the unrealized loss included in accumulated other comprehensive income is recognized and recorded as a non-operating loss in the Statements of Operations.

Factors that management considers in determining whether a decrease in the market value of its securities is an other-than-temporary decline include if there has been a significant change in the financial condition, operational structure or near-term prospects of the issuer; how long and how much the security has been below carrying value; and whether TDS has the intent and ability to retain its investment in the issuer’s securities to allow the market value to return to the accounting cost basis.

TDS utilizes derivative financial instruments to reduce market risks due to fluctuations in market prices of marketable equity securities. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, TDS had variable prepaid forward contracts (“forward contracts”) maturing in 2007 and 2008 in connection with substantially all TDS’s marketable equity security portfolio, hedging the market price risk with respect to the contracted securities. The downside risk is hedged at or above the accounting cost basis thereby eliminating the risk of an other-than-temporary loss being recorded on these contracted securities.

Derivative Instruments

TDS utilizes derivative financial instruments to reduce marketable equity security market value risk. TDS does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. TDS recognizes all derivatives as either assets or liabilities on the Balance Sheet and measures those instruments at fair value. Changes in fair value of those instruments are reported in the Statements of Operations or accumulated other comprehensive income depending on the use of the derivative and whether it qualifies for hedge accounting. The accounting for gains and losses associated with changes in the fair value of the derivative and the effect on the consolidated financial statements depends on the derivative’s hedge designation and whether the hedge is anticipated to be highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in the fair value of the hedged item or cash flows of the asset hedged.

46

Licenses

Licenses consist of costs incurred in acquiring Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) licenses to provide wireless service. These costs include amounts paid to license applicants and owners of interests in entities awarded licenses and all direct and incremental costs relating to acquiring the licenses. Licenses are intangible assets with indefinite useful lives and are not amortized.

TDS has determined that licenses are intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, based on the following factors:

•Radio spectrum is not a depleting asset.

•The ability to use radio spectrum is not limited to any one technology.

•U.S. Cellular and its consolidated subsidiaries are licensed to use radio spectrum through the FCC licensing process, which enables licensees to utilize specified portions of the spectrum for the provision of wireless service.

•U.S. Cellular and its consolidated subsidiaries are required to renew their FCC licenses every ten years. To date, all of U.S. Cellular’s license renewal applications, filed for unique licenses in every year from 1994 to the present, have been granted by the FCC. Generally, license renewal applications filed by licensees otherwise in compliance with FCC regulations are routinely granted. If, however, a license renewal application is challenged, either by a competing applicant for the license or by a petition to deny the renewal application, the license will be renewed if the licensee can demonstrate its entitlement to a “renewal expectancy.” Licensees are entitled to such an expectancy if they can demonstrate to the FCC that they have provided “substantial service” during their license term and have “substantially complied” with FCC rules and policies. U.S. Cellular believes that it could demonstrate its entitlement to a renewal expectancy in any of its markets in the unlikely event any of its license renewal applications were challenged, and therefore believes that it is probable that its future license renewal applications will be granted.

License Rights

In accordance with an exchange agreement with AT&T Wireless, U.S. Cellular has deferred the assignment and development of certain licenses for a period of up to five years from the closing date, August 1, 2003. The 21 licenses that have not yet been assigned to U.S. Cellular, with a recorded value of $42.0 million, are included in license rights on the Balance Sheet.

Goodwill

TDS has goodwill as a result of the acquisition of licenses and wireless markets, and the acquisition of operating telephone companies. U.S. Cellular’s goodwill reflects the portion of the purchase price of acquisitions of interest in operating wireless markets that was not assigned to the other acquired assets, including licenses. TDS Telecom’s goodwill reflects the costs in excess of the underlying fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets of acquired telephone companies.  No deferred taxes have been provided on goodwill.

Impairment of Intangible Assets

Licenses and goodwill must be reviewed for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. TDS performs the annual impairment review on licenses and goodwill during the second quarter. There can be no assurance that upon review at a later date material impairment charges will not be required.

The intangible asset impairment test consists of comparing the fair value of the intangible asset to the carrying amount of the intangible asset. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference. The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process. The first step compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, the second step of the test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. To calculate the implied fair value of goodwill, an enterprise allocates the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that reporting unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value was the price paid to acquire the reporting unit. The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit is the implied fair value of goodwill. If the carrying amount exceeds the implied fair value, an impairment loss is recognized for that difference.

The fair value of an intangible asset and reporting unit goodwill is the amount at which that asset or reporting unit could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties. Therefore, quoted market prices in active markets are the best evidence of fair value and should be used when available. If quoted market prices are not available, the estimate of fair value is based on the best information available, including prices for similar assets and the use of other valuation techniques. Other valuation techniques include present value analysis, multiples of earnings or revenue or a similar performance measure. The use of these techniques involve assumptions by management about factors that are highly uncertain including future cash flows, the appropriate discount rate, and other inputs. Different assumptions for these inputs or valuation methodologies could create materially different results.

U.S. Cellular tests goodwill for impairment at the level of reporting referred to as a reporting unit. U.S. Cellular has identified six reporting units pursuant to paragraph 30 of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” The six reporting units represent six geographic groupings of FCC licenses, constituting six geographic service areas. U.S. Cellular combines its FCC licenses into six units of accounting for purposes of testing the licenses for impairment pursuant to Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 02-7, “Unit of Accounting for Testing Impairment of Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets” (“EITF 02-7”), and SFAS No. 142, using the same geographic groupings as its reporting units. The divestitures of markets in 2004 resulted in the elimination of one of the six reporting units.

U.S. Cellular prepared valuations of each of the reporting units for purposes of goodwill impairment testing. A discounted cash flow approach was used to value each of the reporting units, using value drivers and risks specific to each individual geographic region. The cash flow estimates incorporate assumptions that market participants would use in their estimates of fair value. Key assumptions made in this process were the selection of a discount rate, estimated future cash flow levels, projected capital expenditures, and selection of terminal value multiples.

47

U.S. Cellular also prepared valuations of similar groupings of FCC licenses (units of accounting pursuant to EITF 02-7) using an excess earnings methodology, through the use of a discounted cash flow approach. This excess earnings methodology estimates the fair value of the intangible assets (FCC license units of accounting) by measuring the future cash flows of the license groups, reduced by charges for contributory assets such as working capital, trademarks, existing subscribers, fixed assets, assembled workforce and goodwill.

TDS Telecom has recorded goodwill primarily as a result of the acquisition of operating telephone companies. TDS Telecom has assigned goodwill to its incumbent local exchange carrier reporting unit and its competitive local exchange carrier reporting units. The incumbent local exchange carrier reporting unit was valued using a multiple of cash flow valuation technique.

TDS Telecom’s competitive local exchange carrier has two reporting units for purposes of impairment testing as defined by SFAS No. 142; the larger reporting unit was valued using a market approach and the smaller reporting unit was valued using an income approach. The market approach compares the reporting unit to similar companies whose securities are actively traded. Ratios or multiples of value relative to certain significant financial measures, such as revenue and earnings are developed based upon the comparable companies. The valuation multiples are applied to the appropriate financial measures of the reporting unit to indicate its value. The income approach uses a discounted cash flow analysis based on value drivers and risks specific to its reporting unit. The cash flow estimates incorporate assumptions that market participants would use in their estimates of fair value. Key assumptions made in this process were the selection of a discount rate, estimated future cash flow levels, projected capital expenditures, and determination of terminal value.

Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

Investments in unconsolidated entities consists of investments where TDS holds a less than 50% non-controlling ownership interest. TDS follows the equity method of accounting, which recognizes TDS’s proportionate share of the income and losses accruing to it under the terms of its partnership or shareholder agreements, where TDS’s ownership interest equals or exceeds 20% for corporations and 3% to 5% for partnerships and limited liability companies. The cost method of accounting is followed for certain minority interests where TDS’s ownership interest is less than 20% for corporations and 3% to 5% for partnerships and limited liability companies, or where TDS does not have the ability to exercise significant influence.

Property, Plant and Equipment

U.S. Cellular

U.S. Cellular’s property, plant and equipment is stated at the original cost of construction including capitalized costs of certain taxes, payroll-related expenses and estimated costs to remove the assets.

Renewals and betterments of units of property are recorded as additions to plant in service. The original cost of depreciable property retired (along with the related accumulated depreciation) is removed from plant in service and, together with removal cost less any salvage realized, is charged to depreciation expense. Repairs and renewals of minor units of property are charged to system operations expense.

Costs of developing new information systems are capitalized in accordance with Statement of Position 98-1, “Accounting for the Cost of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use,” (“SOP 98-1”) and amortized over a three- or seven-year period, starting when each new system is placed in service.

TDS Telecom

Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier Operations

TDS Telecom’s incumbent local exchange carrier property, plant and equipment is stated at the original cost of construction including the capitalized costs of certain taxes, payroll-related expenses, and an allowance for funds used during construction.

Renewals and betterments of units of property are recorded as additions to telephone plant in service. The original cost of depreciable property retired is removed from plant in service and, together with removal cost less any salvage realized, is charged to accumulated depreciation. No gain or loss is recognized on ordinary retirements of depreciable telephone property. Repairs and renewals of minor units of property are charged to plant operations expense.

Costs of developing new information systems are capitalized and amortized starting when each new system is placed in service.

TDS’s incumbent local exchange carrier operations follow accounting for regulated enterprises prescribed by SFAS No. 71, “Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation.” Management periodically reviews the criteria for applying these provisions to determine whether continuing application of SFAS No. 71 is appropriate. Management believes that such criteria are still being met and therefore has no current plans to change its method of accounting.

Competitive Local Exchange Carrier Operations

TDS Telecom’s competitive local exchange carrier property, plant and equipment is stated at the original cost of construction including capitalized costs of certain taxes and payroll-related expenses.

Renewals and betterments of units of property are recorded as additions to plant in service. The original cost of depreciable property retired (along with the related accumulated depreciation) is removed from plant in service and, together with removal cost less any salvage realized, is charged to depreciation expense. Repairs and renewals of minor units of property are charged to maintenance expense.

Costs of developing new information systems are capitalized and amortized starting when each new system is placed in service.

Depreciation

U.S. Cellular provides for depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.

U.S. Cellular depreciates its leasehold improvement assets associated with leased properties over periods ranging from three to ten years, which approximates the shorter of the assets’ economic lives or the specific lease terms, as defined in SFAS No. 13, “Accounting for Leases,” as amended.

TDS Telecom’s incumbent local exchange carrier operations provide for depreciation on a group basis according to depreciable rates approved by state public utility commissions. TDS Telecom’s competitive local exchange carrier operations provide for depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.

48

Asset Impairment

TDS reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be fully recoverable. The tangible asset impairment test is a two-step process. The first step compares the carrying value of the assets with the estimated undiscounted cash flows over the remaining asset life. If the carrying value of the assets is greater than the undiscounted cash flows, the second step of the test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss.  The second step compares the estimated fair value of the assets to the carrying value of the assets.  An impairment loss is recognized for the difference between the fair value of the assets (less cost to sell) and the carrying value of the assets.

The fair value of a tangible asset is the amount at which that asset could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties. Therefore, quoted market prices in active markets are the best evidence of fair value and should be used when available. If quoted market prices are not available, the estimate of fair value is based on the best information available, including prices for similar assets and the use of other valuation techniques.  A present value analysis of cash flow scenarios is often the best available valuation technique with which to estimate the fair value of the long-lived asset. The use of this technique involves assumptions by management about factors that are highly uncertain including future cash flows, the appropriate discount rate, and other inputs. Different assumptions for these inputs or valuation methodologies could create materially different results.

TDS Telecom’s competitive local exchange carrier incurred a loss on impairment of long-lived assets in 2004. TDS Telecom has two asset groups for purposes of impairment testing. TDS Telecom valued the larger asset group using a market approach and the smaller asset group using an income approach.  The market approach compares the asset group to similar companies whose securities are actively traded.  Ratios or multiples of value relative to certain significant financial measures, such as revenue and earnings are developed based upon the comparable companies.  The valuation multiples are applied to the appropriate financial measures of the asset group to indicate its value.  The income approach uses a discounted cash flow analysis based on value drivers and risks specific to its asset group. The cash flow estimates incorporate assumptions that market participants would use in their estimates of fair value. Key assumptions made in this process were the selection of a discount rate, estimated future cash flow levels, projected capital expenditures, and determination of terminal value.

Assets and Liabilities of Operations Held For Sale

TDS accounts for the disposal of long-lived assets in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” When long-lived assets meet the held for sale criteria set forth in SFAS No. 144, the Balance Sheet reflects the assets and liabilities of the properties to be disposed of as assets and liabilities of operations held for sale. The assets and liabilities of operations held for sale are presented separately in the asset and liability sections of the Balance Sheet. The revenues and expenses of the properties to be disposed of are included in operations until the transaction is completed.

Asset Retirement Obligations

SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” was issued in June 2001, and became effective for TDS beginning January 1, 2003. SFAS No. 143 requires entities to record the fair value of a liability for legal obligations associated with an asset retirement in the period in which the obligations are incurred. When the liability is initially recorded, the entity capitalizes the cost of the asset retirement obligation by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, the liability is accreted to its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. Upon settlement of the obligations, any differences between the cost to retire an asset and the liability recorded is recognized in the Statement of Operations as a gain or loss.

U.S. Cellular is subject to asset retirement obligations associated primarily with its cell sites, retail sites and office locations. Asset retirement obligations generally include obligations to remediate leased land on which U.S. Cellular’s cell sites and switching offices are located. U.S. Cellular is also generally required to return leased retail store premises and office space to their pre-existing conditions.

The change in asset retirement obligation during 2004 and 2003 was as follows:

Year Ended December 31,	2004			2003
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)			(as restated)
Beginning balance	$	64,540		$	54,438
Additional liabilities accrued	5,426			5,680
Disposition of assets	(2,065		)	—
Accretion expense	4,674			4,422
Ending balance	$	72,575		$	64,540

TDS Telecom’s incumbent local exchange carriers’ rates are regulated by the respective state public utility commissions and the FCC and therefore, reflect the effects of the rate-making actions of these regulatory bodies in the financial statements of the TDS incumbent local exchange carriers. The incumbent local exchange carriers have recorded an asset retirement obligation in accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 143 and a regulatory liability for the costs of removal that state public utility commissions have required to be recorded for regulatory accounting purposes which are in excess of the amounts required to be recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 143. These amounts combined make up the asset retirement obligation for the incumbent local exchange carriers.

The change in asset retirement obligation and regulatory obligation during 2004 and 2003 was as follows:

Year Ended December 31,	2004			2003
(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance	$	60,000		$	55,300
Additional liabilities incurred	6,057			5,600
Costs of removal	(1,057		)	(900		)
Ending balance	$	65,000		$	60,000

The regulatory liability included in asset retirement obligation at December 31, 2004 and 2003 was $31.1 million and $28.2 million, respectively. The asset retirement obligation calculated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 143 at December 31, 2004 and 2003 was $33.9 million and $31.8 million, respectively.

TDS Telecom’s competitive local telephone carriers adopted SFAS No. 143 effective January 1, 2003. TDS Telecom determined that its competitive local telephone carriers do not have a material legal obligation to remove long-lived asset described by SFAS No. 143.

Revenue Recognition

Revenues from wireless operations primarily consist of charges for access, airtime, roaming and value-added services provided for U.S. Cellular’s retail customers and to end users through third-party resellers; charges to carriers whose customers use U.S. Cellular’s systems when roaming; charges for long-distance calls made on U.S. Cellular’s systems; amounts received from the universal service fund in states where U.S. Cellular has been designated an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier; end user equipment sales; and sales of accessories. Revenues are recognized as services are rendered. Unbilled revenues, resulting from wireless service provided from the billing cycle date to the end of each month and from other wireless carriers’ customers using U.S. Cellular’s systems for the last half of each month, are estimated and recorded.

49

Equipment sales represent a separate earnings process. Revenues from equipment and accessory sales are recognized upon delivery to the customer. In order to provide better control over handset quality, U.S. Cellular sells handsets to agents at a price approximately equal to cost. In most cases, the agents receive rebates from U.S. Cellular at the time the agents sign up new customers or retain current customers. U.S. Cellular accounts for the sale of equipment to agents in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue 01-09, “Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer (Including a Reseller of the Vendor’s Products).” This standard requires that equipment sales revenue be reduced by the anticipated rebates to be paid to the agents at the time the agent purchases the handsets rather than at the time the agent signs up a new customer or retains a current customer. Similarly, U.S. Cellular offers certain rebates to customers related to handset purchases; in accordance with EITF Issue 01-09, the equipment sales revenue from a handset sale which includes such a rebate is recorded net of the rebate anticipated to be applied to the handset sale.

Activation fees charged with the sale of service only are deferred and recognized over the average customer service period.

Under EITF Issue 00-21, “Accounting for Multiple Element Arrangements,” activation fees charged with the sale of equipment and service are allocated to the equipment and service based upon the relative fair values of each item. Due to the subsidy provided on customer handsets, this generally results in the recognition of the activation fee as additional handset revenue at the time of sale.

Revenue from incumbent local exchange carriers primarily consists of charges for the provision of local telephone exchange service; compensation for carrying interstate and intrastate long-distance traffic on TDS Telecom’s local telephone networks; and charges for (i) leasing, selling, installing and maintaining customer premise equipment; (ii) providing billing and collection services; (iii) providing Internet services; (iv) reselling long-distance services; and (v) selling digital broadcast satellite receivers. Revenues are recognized as services are rendered.

TDS’s incumbent local exchange carriers participate in revenue pools with other telephone companies for interstate revenue and for certain intrastate revenue. Such pools are funded by toll revenue and/or access charges within state jurisdictions and by access charges in the interstate market. Revenues earned through the various pooling processes are initially recorded based on TDS Telecom’s estimates.

Revenue from competitive local exchange carriers primarily consists of charges for the provision of local telephone exchange service; compensation for carrying interstate and intrastate long-distance traffic on TDS Telecom’s local telephone networks; and charges for providing Internet services and reselling long-distance services. Revenues are recognized as services are rendered.

Cumulative Effect of Accounting Changes

Effective January 1, 2003, TDS adopted SFAS No. 143 and recorded the initial liability for legal obligations associated with an asset retirement. The cumulative effect of the implementation of this accounting standard on periods prior to 2003 was recorded in the first quarter of 2003, decreasing net income by $11.8 million, net of income taxes of $9.7 million and minority interest of $3.0 million or $.20 per diluted share.

The following pro forma amounts show the effect of the retroactive application of the change in accounting principle for the adoption of SFAS No. 143:

Year Ended December 31,	2003		2002
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	(as restated)		(as restated)
Actual
Net income (loss)	$	32,121	$	(960,084	)
Basic earnings (loss) per share	0.55		(16.38		)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	0.54	$	(16.38	)
Pro forma
Net income (loss)	$	43,910	$	(962,633	)
Basic earnings (loss) per share	0.76		(16.41		)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	0.76	$	(16.41	)

(Dollars in thousands)	December 31, 2002
Pro forma–Balance Sheet data
Asset retirement obligation	$	109,738

Effective January 1, 2002, TDS adopted SFAS No. 142 and determined that wireless licenses have indefinite lives.  Upon initial adoption, TDS reviewed its investments in licenses and determined there was an impairment loss on certain licenses.  The cumulative effect of the initial impairment upon the adoption of SFAS No. 142 reduced net income in 2002 by $10.4 million, net of income taxes of $8.2 million and minority interest of $2.3 million, or $0.18 per diluted share.

Effective January 1, 2002, U.S. Cellular changed its method of accounting for commission expenses related to customer activations and began deferring expense recognition of a portion of commission expenses in the amount of deferred activation fee revenues. TDS believes this change is a preferable method of accounting for such costs primarily due to the fact that the new method of accounting provides for better matching of revenue from customer activations to direct incremental costs associated with these activations within each reporting period. The cumulative effect of this accounting change on periods prior to 2002 was recorded in 2002 increasing net income by $3.4 million, net of income taxes of $3.0 million and minority interest of $1.2 million, or $.06 per diluted share.

Advertising Costs

TDS expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expense totaled $171.2 million, $140.8 million and $105.4 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Income Taxes

TDS files a consolidated federal income tax return. Deferred taxes are computed using the liability method, whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss carryforwards, and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Both deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the tax rates anticipated to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Stock-Based Compensation

TDS accounts for stock options and employee stock purchase plans under Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” as allowed by SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” using the intrinsic value method.

50

No compensation costs were recognized for the stock option and employee stock purchase plans in 2004 and 2002. In 2003, TDS recorded compensation expense of $0.3 million on 53,000 options granted in 2003. No compensation costs were recognized for the remaining 615,000 options granted in 2003. Had compensation cost for all stock option and employee stock purchase plans been determined consistent with SFAS No. 123, TDS’s net income available to common and earnings per share would have been reduced to the following pro forma amounts:

Year Ended December 31,	2004			2003			2002
(Dollars in thousands, except  per share amounts)	(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)
Net Income (Loss)
As reported	$	66,649		$	31,704		$	(960,511	)
Pro forma expense	(20,555		)	(14,886		)	(11,503		)
Pro forma	46,094			16,818			(972,014		)
Basic Earnings per Share from
Net income (loss) available to common
As reported	1.16			0.55			(16.38		)
Pro forma expense	(0.36		)	(0.26		)	(0.20		)
Pro forma	0.80			0.29			(16.58		)
Diluted Earnings per Share from
Net income (loss) available to common
As reported	1.15			0.54			(16.38		)
Pro forma expense	(0.36		)	(0.26		)	(0.20		)
Pro Forma	$	0.79		$	0.28		$	(16.58	)

Operating Leases

TDS, U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom are parties to various lease agreements for office space, retail sites, cell sites and equipment that are accounted for as operating leases.  Certain leases have renewal options and/or fixed rental increases.  Renewal options that are reasonably assured are included in determining the lease term. TDS accounts for certain operating leases that contain fixed rental increases by recognizing lease revenue and expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term in accordance with SFAS No. 13, as amended, and related pronouncements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Share-Based Payment

SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment,” was issued in December 2004 and becomes effective for TDS in the third quarter of 2005.  The statement requires that compensation cost resulting from all share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements.  TDS has reviewed the provisions of this statement and expects to record compensation expense for certain share-based payment transactions, primarily related to stock options, in the Statement of Operations upon adoption of this standard.  See the “Stock-Based Compensation” disclosure above for a pro forma impact on net income and earnings per share.

2 INCOME TAXES

Income tax provisions charged to income (loss) from continuing operations before minority interest, discontinued operations and cumulative effect of accounting changes are summarized as follows:

Year Ended December 31,	2004				2003			2002
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)				(as restated)			(as restated)
Current
Federal	$	(226		)	$	10,549		$	1,273
State	14,772				20,777			2,365
Foreign	—				—			7,068
Deferred
Federal	39,241				23,538			(474,702			)
State	5,464				3,398			(147,187			)
Total income tax expense (benefit)	$		59,251		$		58,262	$		(611,183	)

A reconciliation of TDS’s income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations computed at the statutory rate to the reported income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations, and the statutory federal income tax expense (benefit) rate to TDS’s effective income tax expense (benefit) rate from continuing operations, is as follows:

	2004 (as restated)					2003 (as restated)						2002 (as restated)
Year Ended December 31,	Amount			Rate		Amount				Rate		Amount				Rate
(Dollars in millions)
Statutory federal income tax expense (benefit)	$	52.0		35.0	%	$		42.6		35.0	%	$		(544.8	)	(35.0	)%
State income taxes, net of federal benefit(1)	12.7			8.6		10.9				8.9		(58.5			)	(3.8	)
Minority share of income not included in consolidated tax return	(0.5		)	(0.4	)	(4.0			)	(3.4	)	(4.3			)	(0.3	)
Gains (losses) on investments and assets held for sale	22.7			15.3		3.9				3.2		12.6				0.8
Resolution of prior period tax issues	(21.4		)	(14.4	)	1.8				1.5		11.5				0.7
Foreign tax	—			—		—				—		4.6				0.3
Net research tax credit	(6.3		)	(4.2	)	—				—		—				—
Deferred tax rate change (2)	—			—		—				—		(32.6			)	(2.1	)
Other differences, net	0.1			—		3.1				2.6		0.3				0.1
Total income tax expense (benefit)	$	59.3		39.9	%	$	58.3			47.8	%	$	(611.2		)	(39.3	)%

(1)   State income taxes include changes in the valuation allowance which is primarily related to the ability to utilize net operating losses.

(2)   Represents a reassessment of the rate at which TDS provides for deferred taxes.

Income from continuing operations for each of the three years ended December 31, 2004, includes gains and losses (reported in the captions gain (loss) on investments and (gain) loss on assets held for sale, loss on impairment of intangible assets and loss on impairment of long-lived assets in the Statements of Operations) that significantly affected income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest. The effective income tax rate excluding such gains and losses was 23.6%, 43.2%, and 37.6% for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.

The 2004 effective tax rate on operations excluding losses and gains is lower than 2003 due to favorable settlements of several tax issues in 2004. During 2004, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) substantially completed its audit of TDS’s federal income tax returns for the years 1997 through 2001 and TDS’s claims for research tax credits for the years 1995 through 2001. Primarily based on the results of the audit, TDS reduced its accrual for audit contingencies by $21.4 million (14.4%) in 2004. Also in 2004, based upon the results of the federal income tax audit, TDS recorded a $6.3 million (4.2%) benefit for the research tax credits.

Income tax provisions charged to net income (loss) are summarized as follows:

Year Ended December 31,	2004			2003			2002
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)
Current
Federal	$	(226)		$	10,529		$	1,273
State	14,772			20,563			2,365
Foreign	—			—			7,068
Deferred
Federal	42,729			14,729			(479,085			)
State	5,652			1,580			(148,118			)
Total income tax expense (benefit)	$		62,927	$		47,401	$		(616,497	)

Included in income tax expense charged to net income (loss) were deferred income tax benefits on cumulative effect of accounting change of $9.7 million in 2003 and $5.3 million in 2002. Income from discontinued operations was decreased by deferred income tax expense of $3.7 million in 2004 and loss from discontinued operations was decreased by an income tax benefit of $1.2 million in 2003.

51

TDS’s current net deferred tax assets totaled $43.9 million and $21.6 million as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The net current deferred tax asset primarily represents the deferred tax effects of federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards expected to be utilized in 2005 and the allowance for doubtful accounts on customer receivables.

The temporary differences that gave rise to the noncurrent deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

December 31,	2004				2003
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)				(as restated)
Deferred Tax Asset
Net operating loss carryforwards	$	61,977			$	56,623
Derivative instruments	487,216				289,183
Other	38,815				49,692
	588,008				395,498
Less valuation allowance	(55,305			)	(43,006			)
Total Deferred Tax Asset	532,703				352,492
Deferred Tax Liability
Marketable equity securities	1,284,872				1,054,810
Property, plant and equipment	428,355				321,928
Partnership investments	66,432				56,277
Licenses	241,699				224,273
Total Deferred Tax Liability	2,021,358				1,657,288
Net Deferred Income Tax Liability	$		1,488,655		$		1,304,796

At December 31, 2004, TDS and certain subsidiaries had $1,102 million of state NOL carryforwards (generating a $56.1 million deferred tax asset) available to offset future taxable income primarily of the individual subsidiaries that generated the losses.  The state NOL carryforwards expire between 2005 and 2024. Certain subsidiaries that are not included in the federal consolidated income tax return, but file separate federal tax returns, had federal NOL carryforwards (generating a $5.9 million deferred tax asset) available to offset future taxable income. The federal NOL carryforwards expire between 2005 and 2024. A valuation allowance was established for a portion of the state NOL carryforwards and the federal NOL carryforwards since it is more than likely that a portion of such carryforwards will expire before they can be utilized.

TDS is routinely subject to examination of its income tax returns by the IRS and other tax authorities. TDS periodically assesses the likelihood of adjustments to its tax liabilities resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of its provision for income taxes, including related interest. TDS’s management judgment is required in assessing the eventual outcome of these examinations. Changes to such assessments affect the calculation of TDS’s income tax expense. As a result of the substantial completion of federal and state tax audits, TDS has reclassified $26 million from other deferred liabilities and credits to accrued taxes in the current liabilities section of the Balance Sheet.

3 EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed using net income available to common and weighted average common shares adjusted to include the effect of potentially dilutive securities. Potentially dilutive securities include incremental shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options and the potential conversion of preferred stock to common shares.

The amounts used in computing earnings per share from continuing operations and the effect on income and the weighted average number of Common and Series A Common Shares of dilutive potential common stock are as follows:

Year Ended December 31,	2004			2003			2002
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)
Basic Earnings per Share
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	60,490		$	45,519		$	(953,049	)
Preferred dividend requirement	(203		)	(417		)	(427		)
Income (loss) from continuing operations available to common	60,287			45,102			(953,476		)
Discontinued operations	6,362			(1,609		)	—
Cumulative effect of accounting change	—			(11,789		)	(7,035		)
Net income (loss) available to common used in basic earnings per share	$	66,649		$	31,704		$	(960,511	)

Year Ended December 31,	2004			2003			2002
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)			(as restated)			(as restated)
Diluted Earnings per Share
Income (loss) from continuing operations available to common used in basic earnings per share	$	60,287		$	45,102		$	(953,476	)
Minority income adjustment (1)	(506		)	(213		)	—
Income (loss) from continuing operations available to common	59,781			44,889			(953,476		)
Discontinued operations	6,362			(1,609		)	—
Cumulative effect of accounting change	—			(11,789		)	(7,035		)
Net income (loss) available to common used in diluted earnings per share	$	66,143		$	31,491		$	(960,511	)

(1)The minority income adjustment reflects the additional minority share of U.S. Cellular’s income computed as if all of U.S. Cellular’s dilutive issuable securities were outstanding.

Year Ended December 31,	2004	2003	2002
(Shares in thousands)	(as restated)	(as restated)	(as restated)
Weighted average number of Common Shares used in basic earnings per share	57,296	57,721	58,644
Effect of dilutive securities
Common Shares outstanding if Preferred Shares converted (1)	—	—	—
Stock options (2)	271	154	—
Weighted average number of Common Shares used in diluted earnings per share	57,567	57,875	58,644

(1)   Preferred Shares convertible into 75,373 Common Shares in 2004, 210,269 Common Shares in 2003 and 231,013 Common Shares in 2002 were not included in computing diluted earnings per share because their effects were anti-dilutive.

(2)Stock options convertible into 682,122 Common Shares in 2004, 1,277,834 Common Shares in 2003 and 1,792,639 Common Shares in 2002 were not included in computing diluted earnings per share because their effects were anti-dilutive.

Year Ended December 31,	2004		2003			2002
	(as restated)		(as restated)			(as restated)
Basic Earnings per Share
Continuing operations	$	1.05	$	0.78		$	(16.26	)
Discontinued operations	0.11		(0.03		)	—
Cumulative effect of accounting change	—		(0.20		)	(0.12		)
	$	1.16	$	0.55		$	(16.38	)

Year Ended December 31,	2004		2003			2002
	(as restated)		(as restated)			(as restated)
Diluted Earnings per Share
Continuing operations	$	1.04	$	0.77		$	(16.26	)
Discontinued operations	0.11		(0.03		)	—
Cumulative effect of accounting change	—		(0.20		)	(0.12		)
	$	1.15	$	0.54		$	(16.38	)

52

4 MARKETABLE EQUITY SECURITIES

Information regarding TDS’s marketable equity securities is summarized as follows:

December 31,	2004			2003
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)			(as restated)
Deutsche Telekom AG 131,461,861 ordinary shares	$	2,960,521		$	2,403,123
Vodafone Group Plc 12,945,915 American Depositary Receipts	354,459			324,166
VeriSign, Inc. 2,361,333 common shares	79,341			38,490
Rural Cellular Corporation 719,396 equivalent common shares	4,482			5,719
Other	1			912
Aggregate fair value	3,398,804			2,772,410
Accounting cost basis	1,543,677			1,543,932
Gross unrealized holding gains	1,855,127			1,228,478
Equity method unrealized gains	261			126
Income tax expense	(732,179		)	(484,400		)
Minority share of unrealized holding (gains)	(13,987		)	(11,300		)
Unrealized gains on marketable equity securities, net of tax and minority share	1,109,222			732,904
Derivatives, net of tax and minority share	(738,365		)	(438,086		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income	$	370,857		$	294,818

TDS and its subsidiaries hold a substantial amount of marketable equity securities that are publicly traded and can have volatile movements in share prices. TDS and its subsidiaries do not make direct investments in publicly traded companies and all of these interests were acquired as a result of sales, trades or reorganizations of other assets.

The investment in Deutsche Telekom AG (“Deutsche Telekom”) resulted from TDS’s disposition of its over 80%-owned personal communication services operating subsidiary, Aerial Communications, Inc., to VoiceStream Wireless Corporation (“VoiceStream”) in exchange for stock of VoiceStream, which was then acquired by Deutsche Telekom in exchange for Deutsche Telekom stock. The investment in Vodafone Group Plc (“Vodafone”) resulted from certain dispositions of non-strategic wireless investments to or settlements with AirTouch Communications Inc. (“AirTouch”), in exchange for stock of AirTouch, which was then acquired by Vodafone whereby TDS and its subsidiaries received American Depositary Receipts representing Vodafone stock. The investment in VeriSign, Inc. (“VeriSign”) is the result of the acquisition by VeriSign of Illuminet, Inc., a telecommunication entity in which several TDS subsidiaries held interests. The investment in Rural Cellular Corporation (“Rural Cellular”) is the result of a consolidation of several wireless partnerships in which TDS subsidiaries held interests in Rural Cellular, and the distribution of Rural Cellular stock in exchange for these interests.

The market values of the marketable equity securities may fall below the accounting cost basis of such securities.  If TDS determines the decline in value of the marketable equity securities to be other than temporary, the unrealized loss included in accumulated other comprehensive income is recognized and recorded as a loss in the Statement of Operations.

TDS and its subsidiaries have entered into a number of forward contracts related to the marketable equity securities that they hold.  The risk management objective of the forward contracts is to hedge the value of the marketable equity securities from losses due to decreases in the market prices of the securities while retaining a share of gains from increases in the market prices of such securities.  The downside risk is hedged at or above the accounting cost basis thereby eliminating the risk of an other-than-temporary loss on these contracted securities.

5 LICENSES AND GOODWILL

Changes in licenses and goodwill are primarily the result of impairments and acquisitions and divestitures of wireless markets and telephone companies by TDS. See Note 12 – Acquisitions, Divestitures and Exchanges for the details on the changes in licenses and goodwill.

In conjunction with the implementation of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” on January 1, 2002, TDS recorded an impairment loss of $20.9 million, before income tax benefits of $8.2 million and minority interest of $2.3 million as a cumulative effect of an accounting change on licenses for the excess carrying value of the licenses over the fair value. In 2003, TDS recorded an additional impairment loss of $49.6 million on licenses in two reporting units and a $3.5 million loss on impairment of its investment in a non-operating license. An additional $1.8 million impairment loss was recorded in 2004 on the Daytona Beach, Florida license, which was sold in December 2004. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies under the heading “Impairment of Intangible Assets” for a detailed discussion of the license impairment test.

A schedule of license activity follows:

December 31,	2004			2003
(Dollars in thousands)
Balance, beginning of year	$	1,231,363		$	1,247,197
Acquisitions (1)	5,629			178,609
Divestitures	(8,426		)	(76,905		)
Allocation to assets of operations held for sale	—			(63,569		)
Impairment loss	(1,830		)	(53,095		)
Other	2,065			(874		)
Balance, end of year (1)	$	1,228,801		$	1,231,363

(1)Includes $42.0 million of license rights from the AT&T Wireless transactions in 2003.

In response to petitions filed by the Regional Bell Operating Company for increases in rates for certain wholesale services that it provides to competitive local exchange carriers, the state public service commissions of Illinois, Wisconsin and Michigan have issued orders that will adversely affect the cost of providing some services for TDS Telecom’s competitive local exchange carrier operations in those states, primarily services to residential customers and certain small business customers.  The pricing data for the major markets of TDS Telecom’s competitive local exchange carrier became available in the fourth quarter of 2004.  These pricing changes, as well as other regulatory changes and competitive pressures in 2004, triggered an impairment review by TDS Telecom of its competitive local exchange carrier operation tangible and intangible assets.  As a result of the impairment review, TDS Telecom concluded that goodwill associated with the competitive local exchange carrier operations was impaired and recorded a loss on impairment of intangible assets of $29.4 million in the Statement of Operations.

TDS Telecom’s carrying value for the competitive local exchange carrier operations exceeded the fair value of such operations, thus requiring the second step of the goodwill test.  Pursuant to the second step of the goodwill test, TDS Telecom allocated the fair value of the competitive local exchange carrier operations to all of the assets, including unrecognized intangible assets, (e.g., the value of the customer list and trade names) and liabilities of such operations.  As a result of this allocation, there was no implied goodwill.  Therefore, the carrying amount of goodwill was charged to expense.  See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies under the heading “Impairment of Intangible Assets” for a detailed discussion of the goodwill impairment test.

53

In 2003, TDS recorded a goodwill impairment loss of $5.0 million, included in gain (loss) on investments in the Statement of Operations on a wireless market investment held by TDS Telecom.

A schedule of goodwill activity follows:

December 31,	2004			2003
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)			(as restated)
Consolidated Beginning Balance	$	908,065		$	987,694
U.S. Cellular
Balance, beginning of year	449,550			524,038
Acquisitions	4,225			7,516
Divestitures	(8,257		)	(69,961		)
Allocation to assets of operations held for sale	—			(7,565		)
Other	(306		)	(4,478		)
Balance, end of year	445,212			449,550
TDS Telecom–ILEC
Balance, beginning of year	395,894			396,035
Other	—			(141		)
Balance, end of year	395,894			395,894
TDS Telecom–CLEC
Balance, beginning of year	29,440			29,440
Impairment loss	(29,440		)	—
Balance, end of year	—			29,440
Other
Balance, beginning of year	33,181			38,181
Divestitures	(30,900		)	—
Impairment loss	—			(5,000		)
Balance, end of year	2,281			33,181
Net Change	(64,678		)	(79,629		)
Consolidated Ending Balance	$	843,387		$	908,065

6 CUSTOMER LISTS

Customer lists, intangible assets from the acquisition of wireless properties, are being amortized based on average customer retention periods using the declining balance method. The acquisition of certain minority interests in 2004 added $12.9 million to the gross balance of customer lists. Amortization expense was $12.4 million, $15.6 million and $6.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Amortization expense related to customer list assets recorded as of December 31, 2004 for the years 2005 through 2009 is expected to be $8.2 million, $5.4 million, $3.6 million, $2.4 million and $1.6 million, respectively.

7 INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITIES

Investments in unconsolidated entities consist of amounts invested in wireless and wireline entities in which TDS holds a minority interest. These investments are accounted for using either the equity or cost method, as shown in the following table:

December 31,	2004			2003
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)			(as restated)
Equity method investments:
Capital contributions, loans and advances	$	25,918		$	37,500
Goodwill	18,594			23,821
Cumulative share of income	404,765			387,806
Cumulative share of distributions	(262,223		)	(252,492		)
	187,054			196,635
Cost method investments:
Capital contributions, net of partnership contributions and impairments	3,920			5,565
Goodwill	8,544			8,978
	12,464			14,543
Total investments in unconsolidated entities	$	199,518		$	211,178

TDS follows the equity method of accounting for minority interests where TDS’s ownership interest is 20% or greater for corporations or greater than 3% to 5% for partnerships and limited liability companies. This method recognizes, on a current basis, TDS’s proportionate share of the income and losses accruing to it under the terms of the respective partnership and shareholder agreements. Income and losses from the entities are reflected in the consolidated Statement of Operations on a pretax basis as investment income. Investment income totaled $64.9 million, $52.2 million and $43.8 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. TDS follows the cost method of accounting for its investments where TDS’s ownership interest is less than 20% for corporations or 3% to 5% for partnerships and limited liability companies, or where TDS does not have the ability to exercise significant influence.

Investments in unconsolidated entities include goodwill and costs in excess of the underlying book value of certain investments. At December 31, 2004, $172.4 million represented the investment in underlying equity and $27.1 million represented goodwill. At December 31, 2003, $178.4 million represented the investment in underlying equity and $32.8 million represented goodwill.

With the adoption of FIN 46R in January 2004, one wireless market that was included in investment in unconsolidated entities as of the end of 2003 was included in consolidated operations.  This market was subsequently sold to ALLTEL on November 30, 2004 along with other wireless properties.  In the ALLTEL transaction, TDS sold six minority interests that had been included in investment in unconsolidated entities. The transaction reduced goodwill $5.5 million and the investment in underlying equity by $15.9 million.  See Note 12 – Acquisitions, Divestitures and Exchanges for more information related to this transaction.

Also during 2004, TDS reduced the carrying value of one of its cost method investments by $0.5 million. The change was included in gain (loss) on investment on the Statement of Operations.

During 2003, TDS reduced the carrying value of one of its cost method investments by $1.7 million. This charge was included in gain (loss) on investments on the Statement of Operations.

Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership meets certain tests pursuant to Rule 3-09 of SEC Regulation S-X, contributing $41.8 million, $29.9 million and $21.9 million in investment income in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. TDS’s more significant investments in unconsolidated entities consist of the following:

	Percentage Ownership
December 31,	2004		2003
Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership	5.5	%	5.5	%
Raleigh-Durham MSA Limited Partnership(1)	—		8.0	%
Midwest Wireless Communications, LLC	15.2	%	15.2	%
North Carolina RSA 1 Partnership	50.0	%	50.0	%
Oklahoma City SMSA Limited Partnership	14.6	%	14.6	%

(1) As a result of the agreement with ALLTEL, as described more fully in Note 12 – Acquisitions, Divestitures and Exchanges, TDS’s investment in this partnership was sold to ALLTEL on November 30, 2004.

54

Based primarily on data furnished to TDS by third parties, the following summarizes the combined assets, liabilities and equity, and the combined results of operations of the entities for which TDS’s investments are accounted for by the equity method.

December 31,	2004		2003
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)		(as restated)
Assets
Current	$	297,000	$	259,000
Due from affiliates	447,000		279,000
Property and other	1,698,000		1,705,000
	$	2,442,000	$	2,243,000
Liabilities and Equity
Current liabilities	$	213,000	$	170,000
Deferred credits	78,000		85,000
Long-term debt	23,000		33,000
Long-term capital lease obligations	23,000		—
Partners’ capital and stockholders’ equity	2,105,000		1,955,000
	$	2,442,000	$	2,243,000

Year Ended December 31,	2004		2003		2002
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)		(as restated)		(as restated)
Results of Operations
Revenues	$	3,088,000	$	2,543,000	$	2,238,000
Costs and expenses	2,188,000		1,860,000		1,721,000
Operating Income	900,000		683,000		517,000
Other income (expense)	37,000		11,000		16,000
Net income	$	937,000	$	694,000	$	533,000

8 NOTES RECEIVABLE

Included in notes receivable is a loan of $55.1 million to Airadigm Communications, Inc. (“Airadigm”), related to the funding of Airadigm’s operations. The value of the note was directly related to the values of certain assets and contractual rights of Airadigm. As a result of changes in business strategies and other events, in 2002, management reviewed the Airadigm business plan and reviewed the fair market value of the wireless markets and concluded that the notes receivable were impaired. TDS recorded valuation allowances against the Airadigm notes receivable, reducing the carrying value by $55.1 million to zero, and charged $1.1 million of capitalized cost to expense.

9 PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

U.S. Cellular’s property, plant and equipment consists of the following:

December 31,	2004		2003
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)		(as restated)
Cell site-related equipment	$	2,006,473	$	1,778,939
Land, buildings and leasehold improvements	782,676		621,443
Switching-related equipment	617,650		460,165
Office furniture and equipment	225,236		203,145
Systems development	220,471		212,043
Other operating equipment	154,045		127,641
Work in process	126,920		252,012
	4,133,471		3,655,388
Accumulated depreciation	1,692,751		1,383,999
	$	2,440,720	$	2,271,389

During 2004, U.S. Cellular adjusted the useful lives of Time Division Multiple Access (“TDMA”) radio equipment, switch software and antenna equipment. TDMA radio equipment lives were adjusted to be fully depreciated by the end of 2008, which is the latest date the wireless industry will be required by law to support analog service. U.S. Cellular currently uses TDMA radio equipment to support analog service, and expects to have its digital radio network fully migrated to Code Division Multiple Access (“CDMA”) 1XRTT or some future generation of CDMA technology by that time. The useful lives for certain switch software were reduced to one year from three years and antenna equipment lives were reduced from eight years to seven years in order to better align the useful lives with the actual length of time the assets are expected to be in use. These changes increased depreciation by $14.9 million in 2004. The changes in useful lives reduced net income by $7.4 million, or $0.13 per share in 2004.

In 2004, certain U.S. Cellular TDMA digital radio equipment consigned to a third party for future sale was taken out of service and was written down by $17.2 million prior to its consignment, increasing depreciation expense by that amount. This writedown was necessary to reduce the book value of the assets sold or to be sold to the proceeds received or expected to be received from their disposition.

In preparation for the implementation of a fixed asset management and tracking software system, including a bar code asset identification system, U.S. Cellular conducted a physical inventory review of its cell site fixed assets in 2004. As a result of the review, U.S. Cellular charged $11.9 million to depreciation expense for the write-off of certain assets in 2004.

Useful lives generally range from six to twenty-five years for cell site-related equipment; twenty years for buildings; three to ten years, which approximates the shorter of the assets’ economic lives or the specific lease terms, for leasehold improvements; one to eight years for switching-related equipment; three to five years for office furniture and equipment; three to seven years for systems development; and five to twenty-five years for other operating equipment. Depreciation expense totaled $450.3 million, $374.9 million and $312.4 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Amortization expense on system development costs totaled $30.3 million, $34.0 million and $28.8 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

TDS Telecom’s property, plant and equipment consists of the following:

December 31,	2004		2003
(Dollars in thousands)			(as restated)
Incumbent Local Exchange Operations
Cable and wire	$	1,057,387	$	1,052,964
Central office equipment	625,111		606,894
Office furniture and equipment	111,825		109,844
Systems development	125,244		110,359
Land and buildings	82,738		82,799
Other equipment	65,928		64,502
Work in process	20,905		37,344
	2,089,138		2,064,706
Accumulated depreciation	1,242,160		1,175,370
	846,978		889,336
Competitive Local Exchange Operations
Cable and wire	55,080		74,082
Central office equipment	138,405		165,849
Office furniture and equipment	23,565		37,126
Systems development	11,446		11,296
Land and buildings	382		475
Other equipment	5,084		5,107
Work in process	4,709		3,458
	238,671		297,393
Accumulated depreciation	139,887		108,938
	98,784		188,455
Total	$	945,762	$	1,077,791

Useful lives of incumbent local exchange property generally range from fifteen to twenty years for cable and wire, eight to twelve years for central office equipment, five to ten years for office furniture and equipment, five to seven years for systems development and ten to fifteen years for other equipment. Buildings are depreciated over thirty years. The provision for depreciation as a percentage of depreciable property was 6.6% in 2004, 6.6% in 2003 and 6.2% in 2002. Depreciation expense totaled $129.7 million, $127.7 million and $128.0 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

55

Useful lives of competitive local exchange property generally range from fifteen to twenty years for cable and wire, five to twelve years for central office equipment, five to ten years for office furniture and equipment, five to seven years for systems development and ten to fifteen years for other equipment. Buildings are depreciated over thirty years. The provision for depreciation as a percentage of depreciable property was 12.0% in 2004, 9.0% in 2003 and 12.7% in 2002. Depreciation expense totaled $33.9 million, $31.2 million and $28.9 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

As discussed in Note 5 – Licenses and Goodwill, regulatory changes and competitive pressures in 2004 triggered an impairment review by TDS Telecom of its competitive local exchange carrier operations’ tangible assets. As a result of the impairment review, TDS Telecom concluded that the long-lived tangible assets of its competitive local exchange carrier operations were impaired and recorded a loss on impairment of tangible assets of $87.9 million in the Statement of Operations.

TDS reviewed the long-lived assets for possible impairment based on an estimate of related undiscounted cash flows over the remaining asset lives. TDS concluded that the undiscounted cash flows attributable to the fixed assets were less than the carrying values of the fixed assets, thus requiring the second step of the long-lived asset impairment test. Pursuant to the second step of the long-lived asset impairment test, TDS Telecom calculated the fair value of the fixed assets. The loss recognized is the difference between the fair value and the carrying value of the fixed assets. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies under the heading “Impairment of Tangible Assets” for a detailed discussion of the long-lived asset impairment test.

TDS recorded a write-down of plant assets totaling $0.4 million in the incumbent local exchange operations and a write-down of $4.6 million in the competitive local exchange operations in 2003, of which $3.3 million related to plant assets.

Corporate and other fixed assets totaled $78.9 million and $85.2 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003 with corresponding accumulated depreciation of $45.9 million and $55.7 million, respectively.  Corporate and other fixed assets consist of assets at the TDS corporate offices and Suttle Straus.  The corporate assets primarily consist of office furniture and equipment with useful lives ranging from 3 to 7 years.  Depreciation expense is computed on a straight line basis and is assessed out to U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom.  The amounts assessed out totaled $2.7 million, $3.2 million and $3.7 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002.  The Suttle Straus assets primarily consist of a building, equipment and vehicles with useful lives ranging from 31.5 years for the building and three to seven years for equipment and vehicles.  Depreciation expense is computed on a straight line basis and totaled $2.5 million, $2.4 million and $2.0 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002.

10 OPERATIONS HELD FOR SALE

There were no operations held for sale as of December 31, 2004.

On November 26, 2003, U.S. Cellular announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement to sell its southern Texas wireless markets to AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. (“AT&T Wireless”), now a subsidiary of Cingular Wireless LLC, for $96.5 million in cash. The U.S. Cellular markets sold to AT&T Wireless included 25 MHz metropolitan statistical area and rural service area licenses representing 1.3 million population equivalents, approximately 150 cell sites and 76,000 customers. The closing of the sale occurred on February 18, 2004.

The sale was accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” The Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2003 reflected assets and liabilities of the wireless properties to be sold as assets and liabilities of operations held for sale. The revenues and expenses of the markets were included in operations until the completion of the sale.

The following table summarizes the recorded value of the assets and liabilities of operations held for sale as of December 31, 2003:

Year Ended December 31,	2003
(Dollars in thousands)
Current assets	$	5,363
Property, plant and equipment, net	45,710
Licenses	63,569
Goodwill	7,565
Other assets	316
Loss on assets held for sale	(22,000		)
Assets of operations held for sale	$	100,523
Current liabilities	$	2,189
Non-current liabilities	238
Liabilities of operations held for sale	$	2,427

In 2003, U.S. Cellular recorded a loss of $22.0 million as a loss on assets held for sale (included in operating expenses) representing the difference between the carrying value of the markets to be sold to AT&T Wireless and the cash received in the transaction. In 2004, this amount was reduced by $0.7 million to finalize the loss upon closing of the transaction, for an aggregate loss of $21.3 million.

11 SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES

Following are supplemental cash flow disclosures for interest and income taxes paid and certain noncash transactions.

Year Ended December 31,	2004			2003			2002
(Dollars in thousands)
Interest paid	$	176,912		$	143,159		$	112,062
Income taxes paid (refund received)	(10,512		)	(53,112		)	77,443
Common Shares issued for conversion of Preferred Shares	—			2,940			122
Notes issued for the Chicago acquisition	$	—		$	—		$	175,000

12 ACQUISITIONS, DIVESTITURES AND EXCHANGES

TDS assesses its holdings on an ongoing basis in order to maximize the benefits derived from its operations. TDS also reviews attractive opportunities to acquire additional telecommunications companies and wireless spectrum that it believes will add value to the business.

2004 Activity

On December 20, 2004, U.S. Cellular completed the sale of its Daytona Beach Florida 20 megahertz C block personal communications service license to MetroPCS California/Florida Inc. (“MetroPCS”) for $8.5 million. TDS recorded impairment losses of $1.8 million in 2004 and $3.5 million in 2003 in gain (loss) on investments included within investment and other income (expense) on the Statement of Operations related to the Daytona license. Also included in gain (loss) on investments in 2004 was a loss of $0.3 million associated with buying out the former partner of the Daytona investment.

56

On November 30, 2004, TDS and U.S. Cellular completed the sale to ALLTEL of certain wireless properties. TDS and U.S. Cellular subsidiaries sold three consolidated properties and six minority interests to ALLTEL for $142.9 million in cash, including repayment of debt and working capital that is subject to adjustment. TDS recorded a pre-tax gain of $50.9 million related to the ALLTEL transaction representing the excess of the cash received over the net book value of the assets and liabilities sold. The portion of the gain related to the two consolidated markets included in operations of $10.1 million, was recorded in (gain) loss on assets held for sale in the Statement of Operations. The remaining portion of the gains of $40.8 million was recorded in gain (loss) on investments included within investment and other income (expense) of the Statement of Operations. TDS has included the results of operations of the markets sold to ALLTEL in the Statement of Operations through November 30, 2004.

The following table summarizes the recorded value of the assets and liabilities transferred to ALLTEL.

(Dollars in thousands)	November 30, 2004
Current assets	$	(11,897	)
Property, plant and equipment	(33,223		)
Licenses transferred	(258		)
Goodwill	(39,157		)
Investment in unconsolidated entities	(21,427		)
Other assets and liabilities	647
Current liabilities	3,417
Minority interest divested	9,924
Gain recorded on transfer	(50,923		)
Cash (received)	$	(142,897	)

On February 18, 2004, U.S. Cellular completed the sale of certain of its wireless properties in southern Texas to AT&T Wireless for $96.5 million in cash, including a working capital adjustment. The U.S. Cellular properties sold to AT&T Wireless included wireless assets and customers in six markets. An aggregate loss of $21.3 million (including a $22.0 million estimate of the loss on assets of operations held for sale in the fourth quarter of 2003 and a $0.7 million reduction of the loss in 2004) was recorded as a (gain) loss on assets of operations held for sale (included in operating expenses), representing the difference between the carrying value of the markets sold to AT&T Wireless and the cash received in the transaction. On December 31, 2003, U.S. Cellular reflected the assets and liabilities to be transferred to AT&T Wireless as assets and liabilities held for sale in accordance with SFAS No. 144. U.S. Cellular has included the results of operations of the markets sold to AT&T Wireless in the Statement of Operations through February 17, 2004.

The following table summarizes the recorded value of the southern Texas assets and liabilities sold to AT&T Wireless.

(Dollars in thousands)	February 18, 2004
Current assets	$	(4,342	)
Property, plant and equipment	(46,592		)
Wireless licenses transferred	(63,237		)
Goodwill	(7,565		)
Other assets and liabilities	1,483
Current liabilities	2,455
Loss recorded on transfer	21,275
Cash (received)	$	(96,523	)

In addition, in 2004 U.S. Cellular purchased certain minority interests in several wireless markets in which it already owned a controlling interest for $40.8 million in cash and $2.0 million to be paid in 2005. These acquisitions increased licenses, goodwill and customer lists by $5.6 million, $4.2 million and $12.9 million, respectively.

In aggregate, the 2004 acquisitions, divestitures and exchanges decreased licenses by $2.8 million and goodwill by $34.9 million. Licenses and goodwill associated with the southern Texas transaction with AT&T Wireless that closed in 2004 were included in assets of operations held for sale in 2003.

2003 Activity

During 2003, U.S. Cellular completed an exchange with AT&T Wireless along with the acquisition of two minority interests.

On August 1, 2003, U.S. Cellular completed the transfer of properties to AT&T Wireless and the assignments to it by AT&T Wireless of a portion of the licenses covered by the agreement with AT&T Wireless. On the initial closing date, U.S. Cellular also received approximately $34.0 million in cash and minority interests in six markets in which it currently owns a controlling interest. Also on the initial closing date, U.S. Cellular transferred wireless assets and customers in 10 markets in Florida and Georgia to AT&T Wireless. The assignment and development of certain licenses has been deferred by U.S. Cellular for a period of up to five years from the closing date, in accordance with the agreement. U.S. Cellular will take possession of the licenses in staggered closings over that five-year period to comply with service requirements of the Federal Communications Commission. The acquisition of the licenses in the exchange was accounted for as a purchase by U.S. Cellular and the transfer of the properties by U.S. Cellular to AT&T Wireless was accounted for as a sale. TDS capitalized $2.8 million of costs associated with the AT&T Wireless transaction.

The 15 licenses that have been transferred to U.S. Cellular as of December 31, 2003, with a recorded value of $136.6 million, are included in licenses on the Balance Sheet. The 21 licenses that have not yet been assigned to U.S. Cellular, with a recorded value of $42.0 million, are included in license rights on the Balance Sheet. TDS has included the results of operations in the Florida and Georgia markets in the Statement of Operations until the date of the transfer, August 1, 2003.

Prior to the close of the AT&T Wireless exchange, U.S. Cellular allocated $70.0 million of goodwill related to the properties transferred to AT&T Wireless to assets of operations held for sale in accordance with SFAS No. 142. A loss of $23.9 million was recorded as a loss on assets held for sale (included in operating expenses) representing the difference between the book value of the markets transferred to AT&T Wireless and the fair value of the assets received or to be received in this transaction.

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the AT&T Wireless licenses received and the recorded value of the Florida and Georgia assets and liabilities transferred to AT&T Wireless from U.S. Cellular.

(Dollars in thousands)	August 1, 2003
Current assets	$	(12,785	)
Property, plant and equipment	(88,314		)
Licenses transferred	(76,905		)
Licenses received	136,571
License rights	42,037
Goodwill	(69,961		)
Minority interests acquired	3,000
Other assets and liabilities	(717		)
Current liabilities	9,213
Loss recorded on transfer	23,908
Cash received	$	(33,953	)

In addition, in 2003, U.S. Cellular acquired the minority interest in two entities which held licenses for $2.3 million.

In aggregate, the 2003 acquisitions, divestitures and exchanges increased licenses by $59.7 million and license rights by $42.0 million and reduced U.S. Cellular goodwill by $62.4 million.

57

2002 Activity

On August 7, 2002, U.S. Cellular completed the acquisition of the assets and certain liabilities of Chicago 20 MHz, LLC, now known as United States Cellular Operating Company of Chicago, LLC (“USCOC of Chicago” or the “Chicago market”) from PrimeCo Wireless Communications LLC (“PrimeCo”). USCOC of Chicago operates a wireless system in the Chicago major trading area. USCOC of Chicago is the holder of certain FCC licenses, including a 20 megahertz personal communications service license in the Chicago major trading area (excluding Kenosha County, Wisconsin) covering 13.2 million population equivalents.

U.S. Cellular financed the purchase price ($617.8 million) using $327.3 million of revolving lines of credit, $175.0 million in 30-year notes issued to PrimeCo, a $105.0 million loan from TDS and a $10.5 million accrued payable. TDS has included the USCOC of Chicago results of operations in the Statement of Operations subsequent to the purchase date.

The tangible fixed assets were valued at net book value. The personal communications service licenses were valued at $163.5 million. The customer list was assigned a value of $43.4 million and is being amortized based on a 30-month average customer retention period using the declining balance method.

Total goodwill attributed to the Chicago market acquisition aggregated $168.4 million. In January 2003, U.S. Cellular repurchased the $45.2 million 9% Series A notes that remained outstanding at December 31, 2002, at 90% of face value. The $4.5 million gain on retirement of the 9% Series A notes was credited to goodwill, reducing the aggregate goodwill attributed to the Chicago market acquisition to $163.9 million. Such goodwill is deductible for tax purposes and will be amortized over 15 years.

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the PrimeCo assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition.

(Dollars in thousands)	August 7, 2002
Current assets, excluding $6,984 cash acquired	$	34,081
Property, plant and equipment	235,953
Other assets	815
Customer list	43,400
Licenses	163,500
Goodwill	168,436
Total assets acquired	646,185
Current liabilities	(22,518		)
Non-current liabilities	(1,300		)
Total liabilities acquired	(23,818		)
Net assets purchased	622,367
Notes issued to PrimeCo	(175,000		)
Accrued but unpaid items	(15,500		)
Cash required	$	431,867

In addition, TDS acquired two incumbent local telephone companies, three additional personal communications service licenses and additional minority interests in majority-owned markets during 2002. In conjunction with these acquisitions, the following assets were acquired and liabilities assumed. The goodwill acquired in these acquisitions is not deductible for tax purposes.

(Dollars in thousands)	2002
	(as restated)
Current assets, excluding $3,366 cash acquired	$	6,454
Property, plant and equipment	24,640
Licenses	18,010
Goodwill-U.S Cellular	3,827
Goodwill-TDS Telecom	62,784
Other assets	2,068
Current liabilities	(5,450		)
Long-term debt	(9,767		)
Deferred credits	(3,080		)
Other liabilities	(1,627		)
Cash required	$	97,859

In aggregate, the 2002 acquisitions increased licenses by $181.5 million, U.S. Cellular goodwill by $172.3 million and TDS Telecom’s incumbent local exchange carrier goodwill by $62.8 million.

Pro Forma Operations

Assuming the exchanges and acquisitions accounted for as purchases during the period January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2004, had taken place on January 1, 2003; and the acquisitions during the period January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2002, had taken place on January 1, 2002, unaudited pro forma results of operations would have been as follows:

Year Ended December 31,	2004		2003		2002
(Unaudited, dollars in thousands,	(as restated)		(as restated)		(as restated)
except per share amounts)
Operating revenues	$	3,678,275	$	3,312,837	$	3,138,637
Interest expense (including cost to finance acquisitions)	198,706		171,391		141,673
Income (loss) from continuing operations	49,224		39,098		(980,506		)
Net income (loss)	55,586		25,701		(987,541		)
Earnings per share–basic	0.97		0.44		(16.85		)
Earnings per share–diluted	$	0.95	$	0.43	$	(16.85	)

13 GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS

The following table summarizes the components of gain (loss) on investments included in investment and other income (expense) in the Statement of Operations:

Year Ended December 31,	2004			2003			2002
(Dollars in thousands)
Gain on sale of investment interests	$	40,842		$	—		$	—
Impairment of unconsolidated interests	(2,633		)	(10,200		)	(32,716		)
Marketable equity securities other-than-temporary losses	—			—			(1,757,471		)
Notes receivable impairment	—			—			(93,978		)
Other	—			—			(4,226		)
	$	38,209		$	(10,200	)	$	(1,888,391	)

In 2004, TDS recorded a gain of $40.8 million related to the ALLTEL transaction representing the excess of the cash received over the net book value of the minority investments sold.

TDS recorded impairment losses of $1.8 million in 2004 and $3.5 million in 2003 related to the Daytona license that was sold to MetroPCS in December 2004.  Also included in gain (loss) on investments in 2004 was a $0.3 million loss associated with buying out the former partner of the Daytona investment.

Also in 2004, TDS recorded a $0.5 million impairment loss on an investment in a telephone company accounted for using the cost method.

In 2003, U.S. Cellular reduced the carrying value of one of its cost method investments by $1.7 million to its underlying equity value based on a cash flow analysis.

TDS Telecom recorded an impairment loss of $5.0 million in 2003 on a wireless market investment held by it in conjunction with its annual license and goodwill impairment testing.

In 2002, management determined that a decline in the value of marketable equity securities relative to their respective accounting cost basis was other-than-temporary and charged an aggregate $1,757.5 million loss to the Statement of Operations and reduced the accounting cost basis of such marketable equity securities by a corresponding amount.

58

TDS had certain notes receivable from Airadigm and Kington Management Corporation (“Kington”). During 2002, management concluded that the notes receivable were impaired, and accordingly, recorded a $54.8 million valuation allowance and an additional $0.3 million expense included in other income (expense), net, to reduce the Airadigm note receivable carrying value to zero, charged $1.1 million of capitalized costs to expense and reduced the Kington note receivable carrying value by $38.1 million to net realizable value.

TDS recorded additional losses in 2002 of $25.4 million related to the withdrawal from a partnership in which it had owned an investment interest, $7.3 million to the write-down of a wireless investment to fair value and $4.2 million to the reduction in value of a land purchase option.

14 NOTES PAYABLE

TDS has used short-term debt to finance acquisitions, for general corporate purposes and to repurchase common shares. Proceeds from the sale of long-term debt from time to time have been used to reduce such short-term debt. Proceeds from the sale of non-strategic wireless and other investments from time to time have also been used to reduce short-term debt.

TDS had a $600 million revolving credit facility with a group of banks at December 31, 2004, and had $3.4 million of letters of credit outstanding against the revolving credit facility, leaving $596.6 million available for use. On December 9, 2004, TDS entered into an agreement to amend the terms and conditions of this facility. The primary changes to the terms and conditions are that (i) the maturity date has been extended to December 2009 and (ii) the material adverse change condition has been removed with respect to drawdowns. Borrowings bear interest at the London InterBank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a contractual spread based on TDS’s credit rating. At December 31, 2004, the contractual spread was 30 basis points (the one-month LIBOR rate was 2.4% at December 31, 2004). The margin percentage increases by 10 basis points if more than 50% of the facility is outstanding. TDS may select borrowing periods of either seven days or one, two, three or six months. Under certain circumstances, with less than two days’ notice of intent to borrow, interest on borrowings is the prime rate less 50 basis points (the prime rate was 5.25% at December 31, 2004). TDS currently pays facility and administration fees at an aggregate annual rate of 0.11% of the total $600 million facility. These fees totaled $0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.

TDS also had $75 million in direct bank lines of credit at December 31, 2004, all of which were unused. The terms of the direct bank lines of credit provide for borrowings at negotiated rates up to the prime rate (5.25% at December 31, 2004).

On December 19, 2003, U.S. Cellular amended its $325 million revolving credit facility with a group of banks to increase the size of the facility to $700 million. At December 31, 2004, U.S. Cellular’s $700 million revolving credit facility had $30.0 million of borrowings and $0.2 million of letters of credit outstanding against it leaving $669.8 million available for use. On December 9, 2004, U.S. Cellular entered into an agreement to amend the terms and conditions of this facility. The primary changes to the terms and conditions are that (i) the maturity date has been extended to December 2009; (ii) the facility fee and certain interest rates payable on loans have been reduced; (iii) a utilization fee has been added for each day that facility usage exceeds 50% of the total facility; and (iv) the material adverse change condition has been removed with respect to drawdowns. Borrowings bear interest at the LIBOR rate plus a contractual spread based on U.S. Cellular’s credit rating. At December 31, 2004, the contractual spread was 30 basis points (the one-month LIBOR rate was 2.4% at December 31, 2004). U.S. Cellular may select borrowing periods of either seven days or one, two, three or six months. Under certain circumstances, with less than two days’ notice of intent to borrow, interest on borrowings is the prime rate less 50 basis points (the prime rate was 5.25% at December 31, 2004). U.S. Cellular currently pays facility and administration fees at an aggregate annual rate of 0.11% of the total facility. These fees totaled $1.5 million in 2004, $0.7 million in 2003 and $0.5 million in 2002.

Until December 23, 2003, U.S. Cellular had a $500 million revolving credit facility with a group of banks. This credit facility was terminated on December 23, 2003 in connection with the amendment of U.S. Cellular’s $325 million credit facility to $700 million. The terms of the revolving credit facility provided for borrowings with interest at the LIBOR rate plus a margin percentage based on U.S. Cellular’s credit rating. Interest and principal were due the last day of the borrowing period, as selected by U.S. Cellular, of either seven days or one, two, three or six months. U.S. Cellular paid facility and administration fees at an aggregate annual rate of 0.10% of the total $500 million facility. These fees totaled $0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002.

Information concerning notes payable is shown in the table that follows:

Year Ended December 31,	2004			2003
(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at end of year	$	30,000		$	—
Weighted average interest rate at end of year	4.8		%	—		%
Maximum amount outstanding during the year	$	100,000		$	627,892
Average amount outstanding during the year (1)	$	47,917		$	491,960
Weighted average interest rate during the year (1)	2.1		%	1.5		%

(1)The average was computed based on month-end balances.

The financial covenants associated with TDS’s and U.S. Cellular’s lines of credit require that each company maintain certain debt-to- capital and interest coverage ratios. In addition, the financial covenants associated with revolving credit facilities and lines of credit of certain subsidiaries require that these subsidiaries maintain certain debt-to-capital and interest coverage ratios. The covenants of U.S. Cellular’s revolving credit facility prescribe certain terms associated with intercompany loans from TDS or TDS subsidiaries to U.S. Cellular or U.S. Cellular subsidiaries.

59

TDS’s and U.S. Cellular’s interest costs on its revolving credit facilities would increase if their credit ratings from either Standard & Poor’s or Moody’s were lowered. However, their credit facilities would not cease to be available solely as a result of a decline in their credit ratings. A downgrade in TDS’s or U.S. Cellular’s credit ratings could adversely affect their ability to renew existing, or obtain access to new, credit facilities in the future. Standard & Poor’s currently rates both TDS and U.S. Cellular at A- with a Negative Outlook. Moody’s currently rates both Baa1 with a Negative Outlook.

The maturity dates of certain of TDS’s and U.S. Cellular’s credit facilities would accelerate in the event of a change in control.

The continued availability of the revolving credit facilities requires TDS and U.S. Cellular to comply with certain negative and affirmative covenants, maintain certain financial ratios and represent certain matters at the time of each borrowing. On April 19, 2004 and December 22, 2004, TDS and U.S. Cellular announced that they would restate certain financial statements. The restatements resulted in defaults under the revolving credit agreements. TDS and U.S. Cellular were not in violation of any covenants that require TDS and U.S. Cellular to maintain certain financial ratios. TDS and U.S. Cellular did not fail to make any scheduled payments under such revolving credit agreements. TDS and U.S. Cellular received waivers from the lenders associated with the credit agreements under which the lenders agreed to waive any defaults that may have occurred as a result of the restatements. As of December 31, 2004, TDS and U.S. Cellular are in compliance with all covenants and other requirements set forth in their revolving credit agreements.

As disclosed in Note 1, TDS and its audit committee concluded on November 9, 2005 to restate the Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the three years ended December 31, 2004. The restatement resulted in defaults under the revolving credit agreements and one line of credit agreement.  TDS and U.S. Cellular were not in violation of any covenants that require TDS and U.S. Cellular to maintain certain financial ratios.  TDS and U.S. Cellular did not fail to make any scheduled payments under such credit agreements.  TDS and U.S. Cellular received waivers from the lenders associated with the credit agreements, under which the lenders agreed to waive any defaults that may have occurred as a result of the restatement.

15 LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt is as follows:

December 31,	2004			2003
(Dollars in thousands)
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. (Parent)
7.6% Series A notes, due in 2041	$	500,000		$	500,000
Medium-term notes, averaging 9.8%, 9.25% to 10.0% due 2021-2025	52,200			52,200
7.0% senior notes, maturing in 2006	200,000			200,000
Purchase contracts, averaging 6.0%, due through 2021	1,097			1,097
Total Parent	753,297			753,297
Subsidiaries
U.S. Cellular
6% zero coupon convertible debentures (Liquid Yield Options Notes), maturing in 2015	—			310,749
Unamortized discount	—			(153,090		)
	—			157,659
6.7% senior notes maturing in 2033	544,000			444,000
Unamortized discount	(13,070		)	(7,171		)
	530,930			436,829
7.5% senior notes, maturing in 2034	330,000			—
7.25% senior notes, maturing in 2007	—			250,000
8.75% senior notes, maturing in 2032	130,000			130,000
Other, 9.0% due in 2009	10,000			13,000
TDS Telecom
Rural Utilities Service, Rural Telephone Bank and Federal Financing Bank Mortgage notes, various rates averaging 5.7% in 2004 and 5.9% in 2003, due through 2035	234,147			251,697
Other long-term notes, various rates averaging 6.5% in 2004 and 6.8% in 2003, due through 2006	9,891			12,326
Other Subsidiaries
Long-term notes and leases, 4.7% to 5.7%, due through 2009	15,121			13,817
Total Subsidiaries	1,260,089			1,265,328
Total Long-term debt	2,013,386			2,018,625
Less: Current portion of long-term debt	38,787			23,712
Total Long-term debt, excluding current portion	$	1,974,599		$	1,994,913

Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. (Parent)

The unsecured 7.6% Series A notes are due in 2041. Interest is payable quarterly. The notes are redeemable by TDS beginning December 2006 at 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest.

The unsecured medium-term notes mature at various times from 2021 to 2025. Interest is payable semi-annually. The medium-term notes may be redeemed by TDS at par value plus accrued but unpaid interest. As of December 31, 2004, medium-term notes aggregating $17.2 million and $35.0 million have initial redemption dates in 2005 and 2006, respectively. On December 15, 2004, TDS issued notice of its intent to redeem the $17.2 million of medium-term notes in 2005. This amount has been reclassified to current portion of long-term debt on the Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2004. TDS redeemed these notes on January 18, 2005 and February 10, 2005 at a price equal to the principal amount plus accrued interest to the redemption date. TDS redeemed medium-term notes aggregating $70.5 million in 2003. A loss of $0.8 million was recorded on the repurchase and retirement of $5.0 million of medium-term notes in 2003. The remaining medium-term notes were redeemed at par value in 2003.

The unsecured 7.0% senior notes are due August 2006. Interest is payable semi-annually. The notes are redeemable at any time at the option of TDS, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (a) 100% of the principal amount of such notes, plus accrued but unpaid interest, or (b) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest thereon discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at the Treasury Rate plus 0.25%.

60

Subsidiaries–U.S. Cellular

In June 2004, U.S. Cellular issued $330 million in aggregate principal amount of unsecured 7.5% senior notes due June 15, 2034. Interest on the notes is payable quarterly. U.S. Cellular may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, at any time on and after June 17, 2009, at redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. The net proceeds from this offering, after deducting underwriting discounts, were approximately $319.6 million.

Also, in June 2004, U.S. Cellular issued $100 million in aggregate principal amount of unsecured 6.7% senior notes due December 15, 2033, priced to yield 7.21% to maturity. The net proceeds from this offering, after deducting underwriting discounts, were approximately $92.9 million. This was a further issuance of U.S. Cellular’s 6.7% senior notes that were issued in December 2003, in the aggregate principal amount of $444 million.

The total net proceeds from the 7.5% and 6.7% senior note offerings completed in June 2004, after deducting underwriting discounts, were approximately $412.5 million. Of this amount, $163.3 million was used to redeem U.S. Cellular’s Liquid Yield Option Notes, in July 2004, at accreted value. The balance of the net proceeds, together with borrowings under the revolving credit agreement, were used to redeem all $250 million of U.S. Cellular’s 7.25% senior notes on August 16, 2004. No gain or loss was recognized as a result of such redemptions. However, U.S. Cellular wrote off $3.6 million of deferred debt expenses related to the redemption of long-term debt to other income (expense), net in the Statement of Operations in 2004.

In December 2003, U.S. Cellular sold $444 million of 6.7% senior notes due December 15, 2033, priced to yield 6.83% to maturity. Interest is paid semi-annually. U.S. Cellular may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, at any time prior to maturity at a redemption price equal to the greater of (a) 100% of the principal amount of such notes, plus accrued but unpaid interest, or (b) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest thereon discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at the Treasury Rate plus 0.30%. The proceeds were used to repay outstanding short-term debt.

In November 2002, U.S. Cellular sold $130 million of unsecured 8.75% senior notes due in November 2032. Interest is paid quarterly. U.S. Cellular may redeem the notes beginning in 2007 at the principal amount plus accrued interest.

U.S. Cellular’s $250 million, unsecured 7.25% senior notes were due 2007 and interest was payable semi-annually. U.S. Cellular redeemed the notes in August 2004 at the principal amount plus accrued interest.

On July 26, 2004, U.S. Cellular redeemed its Liquid Yield Option Notes at accreted value. The unsecured 6% yield to maturity zero coupon convertible redeemable notes were due in 2015. Each Liquid Yield Option Note was convertible at the option of the holder at any time at a conversion rate of 9.475 U.S. Cellular Common Shares per $1,000 of note. Upon notice of conversion, U.S. Cellular had the option to deliver its Common Shares or cash equal to the market value of the Common Shares. U.S. Cellular had the option to redeem the Liquid Yield Option Notes for cash at the issue price plus accrued original issue discount through the date of redemption. Holders had the right to exercise their conversion option prior to the redemption date. There were no Liquid Yield Option Notes redeemed in 2003 and 2002.

Subsidiaries–TDS Telecom

TDS Telecom’s Rural Utilities Service, Rural Telephone Bank and Federal Financing Bank Mortgage notes issued under certain loan agreements with the Rural Utilities Service, Rural Telephone Bank and Federal Financing Bank, agencies of the United States of America, are to be repaid in equal monthly or quarterly installments covering principal and interest beginning six months to three years after dates of issue and expiring through 2035. Substantially all telephone plant of the incumbent local exchange companies is pledged under Rural Utilities Service and Rural Telephone Bank mortgage notes and various other obligations of the telephone subsidiaries.

Consolidated

The annual requirements for principal payments on long-term debt, excluding amounts due on the forward contracts, are approximately $38.8 million, $222.9 million, $22.6 million, $22.5 million and $31.2 million for the years 2005 through 2009, respectively.

The covenants associated with TDS’s long-term debt obligations, among other things, restrict TDS’s ability, subject to certain exclusions, to incur additional liens; enter into sale and leaseback transactions; and sell, consolidate or merge assets. As of December 31, 2004, TDS was in compliance with all of the covenants of its debt obligations.

In addition, the covenants associated with long-term debt obligations of certain subsidiaries of TDS, among other things, restrict these subsidiaries’ ability, subject to certain exclusions, to incur additional liens; enter into sale and leaseback transactions; sell, consolidate or merge assets, and pay dividends. As of December 31, 2004, TDS’s subsidiaries were in compliance with all of the covenants of their debt obligations.

Forward Contracts

TDS maintains a portfolio of available-for-sale marketable equity securities, the majority of which are the result of sales or trades of non-strategic assets. During 2002, subsidiaries of TDS entered into forward contracts with counterparties in connection with its Deutsche Telekom, Vodafone and VeriSign marketable equity securities with proceeds aggregating $1,631.8 million. The principal amount of the forward contracts was accounted for as a loan. The collar portions of the forward contracts are accounted for as derivative instruments.

The following table summarizes certain facts surrounding the contracted securities, pledged as collateral for the forward contracts.

December 31,		2004			2003
Security	Shares	Loan Amount
(Dollars in thousands)
Deutsche Telekom	131,461,861	$	1,532,257		$	1,532,257
Unamortized debt discount		(62,192		)	(78,177		)
		1,470,065			1,454,080
Vodafone	12,945,915	201,038			201,038
VeriSign	2,361,333	20,819			20,819
Unamortized debt discount		(2,278		)	(3,175		)
		18,541			17,644
		$	1,689,644		$	1,672,762

The Deutsche Telekom forward contracts mature from July 2007 to September 2008. Contracts aggregating $1,094.3 million require quarterly interest payments at the LIBOR rate plus 50 basis points (the three-month LIBOR rate was 2.56% at December 31, 2004). Contracts aggregating $438.0 million are structured as zero coupon obligations with a weighted average effective interest rate of 4.4% per year. No interest payments are required for the zero coupon obligations during the contract period.

61

The Vodafone forward contracts mature in May and October 2007. The Vodafone forward contracts require quarterly interest payments at the LIBOR rate plus 50 basis points (the three-month LIBOR rate was 2.56% at December 31, 2004).

The VeriSign forward contract matures in May 2007 and is structured as a zero coupon obligation with an effective interest rate of 5.0% per year. TDS is not required to make interest payments during the contract period.

Forward contracts aggregating $738.7 million and $1,015.4 million mature in 2007 and 2008, respectively.

The risk management objective of the forward contracts is to hedge the value of the marketable equity securities from losses due to decreases in the market prices of the securities (“downside limit”) while retaining a share of gains from increases in the market prices of such securities (“upside potential”). The downside limit is hedged at or above the accounting cost basis thereby eliminating the risk of an other-than-temporary loss being recorded on these contracted securities.

Under the terms of the forward contracts, subsidiaries of TDS and U.S. Cellular will continue to own the contracted shares and will receive dividends paid on such contracted shares, if any. The forward contracts mature from May 2007 to September 2008 and, at TDS’s and U.S. Cellular’s option, may be settled in shares of the respective security or in cash, pursuant to formulas that “collar” the price of the shares. The collars effectively limit downside risk and upside potential on the contracted shares. The collars are typically adjusted for any changes in dividends on the contracted shares. If the dividend increases, the collar’s upside potential is typically reduced. If the dividend decreases, the collar’s upside potential is typically increased. If TDS and U.S. Cellular elect to settle in shares, they will be required to deliver the number of shares of the contracted security determined pursuant to the formula. If shares are delivered in the settlement of the forward contract, TDS and U.S. Cellular would incur a current tax liability at the time of delivery based on the difference between the tax basis of the marketable equity securities delivered and the net amount realized through maturity. If TDS and U.S. Cellular elect to settle in cash, they will be required to pay an amount in cash equal to the fair market value of the number of shares determined pursuant to the formula. TDS and U.S. Cellular have provided guarantees to the counterparties which provide assurance that all principal and interest amounts are paid when due.

TDS and U.S. Cellular are required to comply with certain covenants under the forward contracts.  On April 19, 2004 and December 22, 2004, TDS and U.S. Cellular announced that they expected to restate certain financial statements. The restatements resulted in defaults under certain of the forward contracts. TDS and U.S. Cellular were not in violation of any covenants that require TDS and U.S. Cellular to maintain certain financial ratios. TDS and U.S. Cellular did not fail to make any scheduled payments under such forward contracts. TDS and U.S. Cellular received waivers from the counterparty to such forward contracts under which the counterparty agreed to waive any defaults that may have occurred as a result of the restatement. As of December 31, 2004, TDS and U.S. Cellular are in compliance with all covenants and other requirements set forth in the forward contracts.

As disclosed in Note 1, TDS and its audit committee concluded on November 9, 2005 to restate the Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the three years ended December 31, 2004. The restatement resulted in defaults under certain of the forward contracts.  TDS and U.S. Cellular were not in violation of any covenants that require TDS and U.S. Cellular to maintain certain financial ratios.  TDS and U.S. Cellular did not fail to make any scheduled payments under such forward contracts.  TDS and U.S. Cellular received waivers from the counterparty to such forward contracts, under which the counterparty agreed to waive any defaults that may have occurred as a result of the restatement.

16 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND DERIVATIVES

Financial Instruments

Financial instruments are as follows:

	2004 (as restated)				2003 (as restated)
December 31,	Book Value		Fair Value		Book Value		Fair Value
(Dollars in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,171,105	$	1,171,105	$	940,578	$	940,578
Current portion of long-term debt	38,787		38,787		23,712		23,712
Notes payable	30,000		30,000		—		—
Long-term debt	1,974,599		2,083,826		1,994,913		2,090,446
Forward contracts	1,689,644		1,691,101		1,672,762		1,679,450
Preferred shares	$	3,864	$	3,249	$	3,864	$	3,151

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, the current portion of long-term debt and notes payable approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments. The fair value of TDS’s long-term debt was estimated using market prices for the 7.6% Series A notes, the 7.0% senior notes, the 6.7% senior notes, the 7.5% senior notes, the 8.75% senior notes and the 6% zero coupon convertible debentures, and discounted cash flow analysis for the remaining debt. The carrying amounts of the variable rate forward contracts approximates fair value due to the repricing of the instruments on a quarterly basis.  The fair value of the zero coupon forward contracts was determined using discounted cash flow analysis.

Derivatives

During 2002, subsidiaries of TDS entered into forward contracts in connection with its Deutsche Telekom, Vodafone and VeriSign marketable equity securities. The principal amount of the forward contracts is accounted for as a loan. The collar portions of the forward contracts are accounted for as derivative instruments. The following table summarizes the shares contracted and the downside limit and upside potential.

		Downside	Upside
December 31, 2004		Limit	Potential
Security	Shares	(Floor)	(Ceiling)
VeriSign	2,361,333	$8.82	$11.46
Vodafone	12,945,915	$15.07-$16.07	$20.01-$22.60
Deutsche Telekom	131,461,861	$10.74-$12.41	$14.21-$17.17

The forward contracts for the forecasted transactions and hedged items are designated as cash flow or fair value hedges and recorded as assets or liabilities on the balance sheet at their fair value. The fair value of the derivative instruments is determined using the Black-Scholes model.

62

The Deutsche Telekom and Vodafone forward contracts are designated as cash flow hedges, where changes in the forward contract’s fair value are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income until they are recognized in earnings when the forward contract is settled. If the delivery of the contracted shares does not occur, or it becomes probable that it will not occur, the gain or loss on the related cash flow hedge is recognized in earnings at that time. No components of the forward contracts are excluded in the measurement of hedge effectiveness. The critical terms of the forward contracts are the same as the underlying forecasted transactions; therefore, changes in the fair value of the forward contracts are anticipated to be effective in offsetting changes in the expected cash flows from the forecasted transactions. No gains or losses related to ineffectiveness of cash flow hedges were recognized in earnings for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003.

With regard to the forward contracts on the Vodafone shares and the Deutsche Telekom shares, transactions being accounted for as cash flow hedges, management has evaluated the expected timing of the hedged forecasted transactions to deliver the underlying shares to settle the forward contracts, and believes that these forecasted transactions are probable of occurring in the periods specified in the related hedge documentation or within an additional two-month period of time thereafter.

The VeriSign forward contract is designated as a fair value hedge, where effectiveness of the hedge is assessed based upon the intrinsic value of the underlying options. The intrinsic value of the forward contract is defined as the difference between the applicable option strike price and the market value of the contracted shares on the balance sheet date. Changes in the intrinsic value of the options are expected to be perfectly effective at offsetting changes in the fair value of the hedged item. Changes in the intrinsic value of the options are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income until they are recognized in earnings when the forward contract is settled. Changes in the time value of the options are excluded from the effectiveness assessment and are recognized in earnings each period. Changes in the time value of the options aggregating a $2.2 million gain and $3.5 million loss for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, were included in the Statement of Operations caption other income (expense).

TDS reported a derivative liability of $1,210.5 million and $712.3 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. These amounts are included in the Balance Sheet caption deferred liabilities and credits.

17 MINORITY INTEREST IN SUBSIDIARIES

The following table summarizes the minority shareholders’ and partners’ interests in the equity of consolidated subsidiaries.

December 31,	2004 (as restated)		2003 (as restated)
(Dollars in thousands)
U.S. Cellular
Public shareholders	$	467,107	$	439,702
Subsidiaries’ partners and shareholders	32,361		50,381
	499,468		490,083
Other minority interests	—		11,434
	$	499,468	$	501,517

The Board of Directors of U.S. Cellular from time to time has authorized the repurchase of U.S. Cellular Common Shares not owned by TDS. U.S. Cellular’s primary repurchase program expired in December 2003. U.S. Cellular may use repurchased shares to fund acquisitions, for the conversion of debt and for other corporate purposes. U.S. Cellular repurchased no shares during 2003.

The Board of Directors of U.S. Cellular has also authorized the repurchase of a limited amount of its common shares on a quarterly basis, primarily for use in the employee benefit plans. In 2004 U.S. Cellular repurchased 91,700 U.S. Cellular Common Shares under this authorization for an aggregate purchase price of $3.9 million representing an average per share price of $42.62 including commissions. U.S. Cellular repurchased no shares in 2003.

Under SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity,” certain minority interests in consolidated entities with finite lives may meet the standard’s definition of a mandatorily redeemable financial instrument and thus require reclassification as liabilities and remeasurement at the estimated amount of cash that would be due and payable to settle such minority interests under the applicable entity’s organization agreement assuming an orderly liquidation of the finite-lived entity, net of estimated liquidation costs (the “settlement value”). TDS’s consolidated financial statements include such minority interests that meet the standard’s definition of mandatorily redeemable financial instruments. These mandatorily redeemable minority interests represent interests held by third parties in consolidated partnerships and limited liability companies (“LLCs”), where the terms of the underlying partnership or LLC agreement provide for a defined termination date at which time the assets of the subsidiary are to be sold, the liabilities are to be extinguished and the remaining net proceeds are to be distributed to the minority interest holders and TDS in accordance with the respective partnership and LLC agreements. The termination dates of TDS’s mandatorily redeemable minority interests range from 2042 to 2100.

The settlement value of TDS’s mandatorily redeemable minority interests was estimated to be $110.6 million at December 31, 2004 and $87.2 million at December 31, 2003. This represents the estimated amount of cash that would be due and payable to settle minority interests assuming an orderly liquidation of the finite-lived consolidated partnerships and LLCs on December 31, 2004 and 2003, net of estimated liquidation costs. This amount is being disclosed pursuant to the requirements of FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. FAS 150-3, “Effective Date, Disclosures, and Transition for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests under FASB Statement No. 150 “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity.” TDS has no current plans or intentions to liquidate any of the related partnerships or LLCs prior to their scheduled termination dates. The corresponding carrying value of the minority interests in finite-lived consolidated partnerships and LLCs at December 31, 2004 and 2003 was $30.6 million and $26.8 million, respectively, and is included in the Balance Sheet caption minority interest in subsidiaries. The excess of the aggregate settlement value over the aggregate carrying value of the mandatorily redeemable minority interests of $80.0 million and $60.4 million, respectively, was primarily due to the unrecognized appreciation of the minority-interest holders’ share of the underlying net assets in the consolidated partnerships and LLCs. Neither the minority-interest holders’ share, nor TDS’s share, of the appreciation of the underlying net assets of these subsidiaries is reflected in the consolidated financial statements under GAAP. The estimate of settlement value was based on certain factors and assumptions. Change in those factors and assumptions could result in a materially larger or smaller settlement amount.

63

18 PREFERRED SHARES

The holders of outstanding Preferred Shares are entitled to one vote per share. TDS had 38,645 Preferred Shares ($100 per share stated value) authorized, issued and outstanding at December 31, 2004 and 2003, 30,000 of which are redeemable at the option of TDS at $100 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends beginning in 2007.  At December 31, 2004 and 2003, 30,000 Preferred Shares were convertible into 54,540 TDS Common Shares, at the option of the holder.  Preferred Shares totaling 8,228 are redeemable at the option of TDS for 4.35 U.S. Cellular common shares or equivalent value in cash or TDS Common Shares.  The remaining Preferred Shares are not redeemable.  The average dividend rate was $5.23 per share in 2004 and 2003.

The following is a schedule of Preferred Shares activity.

Year Ended December 31,	2004		2003			2002
(Dollars in thousands)
Balance, beginning of year	$	3,864	$	6,954		$	7,442
Less:
Conversion of preferred	—		(2,940		)	(122		)
Redemption of preferred	—		(150		)	(366		)
Balance, end of year	$	3,864	$	3,864		$	6,954

19 COMMON STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common Stock

The holders of Common Shares are entitled to one vote per share. The holders of Series A Common Shares are entitled to ten votes per share. Series A Common Shares are convertible, on a share for share basis, into Common Shares. TDS has reserved 6,421,000 Common Shares at December 31, 2004, for possible issuance upon such conversion. See Note 24 – Subsequent Events for discussion of the potential increase in Special Common Shares authorized and the potential use of Special Common Shares. The following table summarizes the number of Common and Series A Common Shares outstanding.

				Net Common		Series A
	Common	Treasury		Shares		Common
(Shares in thousands)	Shares	Shares		Outstanding		Shares
Balance December 31, 2001	55,659	(3,868	)	51,791		6,778
Conversion of Series A Common Shares	189	—		189		(189	)
Dividend reinvestment, incentive and compensation plans	8	65		73		13
Other	13	4		17		—
Conversion of Preferred Shares	6	—		6		—
Balance December 31, 2002	55,875	(3,799	)	52,076		6,602
Repurchase of Common Shares	—	(1,961	)	(1,961	)	—
Conversion of Series A Common Shares	187	—		187		(187	)
Dividend reinvestment, incentive and compensation plans	66	65		131		25
Other	—	7		7		—
Conversion of Preferred Shares	154	—		154		—
Balance December 31, 2003	56,282	(5,688	)	50,594		6,440
Repurchase of Common Shares	—	(215	)	(215	)	—
Conversion of Series A Common Shares	37	—		37		(37	)
Dividend reinvestment, incentive and compensation plans	58	537		595		17
Other	—	4		4		1
Conversion of Preferred Shares	—	—		—		—
Balance December 31, 2004	56,377	(5,362	)	51,015		6,421

Common Share Repurchase Program

The Board of Directors of TDS from time to time has authorized the repurchase of TDS Common Shares. In February 2003, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 3.0 million TDS Common Shares through February 2006. As of December 31, 2004, TDS has repurchased 2,175,700 Common Shares under this authorization, leaving 824,300 shares available for repurchase under the authorization. Share repurchases may be made from time to time on the open market or at negotiated prices in private transactions. TDS may use repurchased shares to fund acquisitions and for other corporate purposes.

In 2004, TDS repurchased 214,800 Common Shares for an aggregate purchase price of $14.9 million, representing an average per share price of $69.15 including commissions. In 2003, TDS repurchased 1,960,900 Common Shares for an aggregate purchase price of $92.4 million, representing an average per share price of $47.10 including commissions. No shares were repurchased in 2002. TDS reissued 541,000 Common Shares in 2004, 72,000 in 2003 and 69,000 in 2002 primarily for incentive and compensation plans.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

The cumulative balance of unrealized gains (losses) on securities and derivative instruments and related income tax effects included in accumulated other comprehensive income are as follows:

Year Ended December 31,	2004			2003
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)			(as restated)
Marketable Equity Securities
Balance, beginning of year	$	732,904		$	241,559
Add (deduct):
Unrealized gains on marketable equity securities	626,609			829,083
Income tax (expense)	(247,764		)	(328,943		)
	378,845			500,140
Equity method unrealized gains (losses)	135			(489		)
Minority share of unrealized (gains) losses	(2,686		)	(8,391		)
Net unrealized gains	376,294			491,260
Recognized losses on marketable equity securities	40			168
Income tax (benefit)	(16		)	(62		)
	24			106
Minority share of recognized (losses)	—			(21		)
Net recognized losses from marketable equity securities included in net income	24			85
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on marketable equity securities in comprehensive income	376,318			491,345
Balance, end of year	$	1,109,222		$	732,904
Derivative Instruments
Balance, beginning of year	$	(438,086	)	$	(49,868	)
Add (deduct):
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments	(500,086		)	(650,586		)
Income tax benefit	198,032			257,054
	(302,054		)	(393,532		)
Minority share of unrealized losses	1,775			5,314
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments included in comprehensive income	(300,279		)	(388,218		)
Balance, end of year	$	(738,365	)	$	(438,086	)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Balance, beginning of year	$	294,818		$	191,691
Net change in marketable equity securities	376,318			491,345
Net change in derivative instruments	(300,279		)	(388,218		)
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) included in comprehensive income	76,039			103,127
Balance, end of year	$	370,857		$	294,818

64

20 DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT, INCENTIVE AND COMPENSATION PLANS

The following table summarizes Common and Series A Common Shares issued, including reissued Treasury Shares, for the employee stock purchase plans and dividend reinvestment plans described below.

Year Ended December 31,	2004	2003
Common Shares
Dividend reinvestment plan	58,000	66,000
Employee stock purchase plan	19,000	16,000
Stock-based compensation plans	518,000	49,000
	595,000	131,000
Series A Common Shares dividend reinvestment plan	17,000	25,000

Tax-Deferred Savings Plan

TDS had reserved 45,000 Common Shares at December 31, 2004, for issuance under the TDS Tax-Deferred Savings Plan, a qualified profit-sharing plan pursuant to Sections 401(a) and 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Participating employees have the option of investing their contributions and TDS’s contributions in a TDS Common Share fund, a U.S. Cellular Common Share fund or certain unaffiliated funds.

Dividend Reinvestment Plans

TDS had reserved 295,000 Common Shares at December 31, 2004, for issuance under the Automatic Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan and 79,000 Series A Common Shares for issuance under the Series A Common Share Automatic Dividend Reinvestment Plan. These plans enable holders of TDS’s Common Shares and Preferred Shares to reinvest cash dividends in Common Shares and holders of Series A Common Shares to reinvest cash dividends in Series A Common Shares. The purchase price of the shares is 95% of the market value, based on the average of the daily high and low sales prices for TDS’s Common Shares on the American Stock Exchange for the ten trading days preceding the date on which the purchase is made.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

TDS had reserved 221,000 Common Shares at December 31, 2004, under the 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which will terminate on December 31, 2008. The plan became effective April 1, 2003, and provides for eligible employees of TDS and its subsidiaries to purchase a limited number of TDS Common Shares on a quarterly basis. The per share cost to each participant is at 85% of the market value of the Common Shares as of the issuance date.

Stock-Based Compensation Plans

TDS accounts for stock options, restricted stock awards and employee stock purchase plans under APB Opinion No. 25. No compensation costs have been recognized for options granted in 2004. TDS recorded compensation expense of $0.3 million on 53,000 options granted in 2003. No compensation costs have been recognized for the remaining 615,000 options granted in 2003. No compensation costs have been recognized for the stock option plans in 2002 and employee stock purchase plans in 2004, 2003 and 2002. Compensation costs were recognized for restricted stock awards as expenses in the Statement of Operations.

TDS had reserved 4,255,000 Common Shares at December 31, 2004, for options granted and to be granted to key employees. TDS has established certain plans that provide for the grant of stock options to officers and employees. The options are exercisable over a specified period not in excess of ten years. Options vest from three months to four years from the date of grant. The options expire from 2005 to 2014 or three months after the date of the employee’s termination of employment, if earlier. Employees who leave at the age of retirement have one year within which to exercise their stock options.

A summary of the status of TDS stock option plans at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and changes during the years then ended is presented in the table and narrative that follows:

					Weighted
					Average
			Weighted		Black-Scholes
	Number		Average		Values of
	of Shares		Option Prices		Option Grants
Stock options:
Outstanding December 31, 2001
(1,031,000 exercisable)	1,391,000		$	80.37
Granted	467,000		$	59.32	$	22.62
Exercised	(41,000	)	$	43.03
Canceled	(20,000	)	$	107.25
Outstanding December 31, 2002
(1,355,000 exercisable)	1,797,000		$	75.24
Granted	668,000		$	45.80	$	17.24
Exercised	(49,000	)	$	43.51
Canceled	(63,000	)	$	82.66
Outstanding December 31, 2003
(1,762,000 exercisable)	2,353,000		$	67.32
Granted	547,000		$	65.98	$	25.73
Exercised	(518,000	)	$	49.08
Canceled	(51,000	)	$	77.07
Outstanding December 31, 2004	2,331,000		$	70.76
(1,791,000 exercisable)

At December 31, 2004, 1,791,000 options were exercisable, have exercise prices between $33.87 and $127.00 and a weighted average exercise price of $75.04. The weighted average exercise price of options exercisable at December 31, 2003 and 2002 was $70.68 and $72.09, respectively.

The following table provides certain details concerning TDS stock options outstanding at December 31, 2004:

				Weighted Average
Range of Exercise Prices	Stock Options Outstanding	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Contractual Life Remaining (Years)
$33.87-$49.99	583,000	$	42.63	5.7
$50.00-$74.99	1,067,000	$	62.18	8.4
$75.00-$99.99	166,000	$	98.36	6.4
$100.00-$127.00	515,000	$	111.44	5.5

The following table provides certain details concerning TDS stock options exercisable at December 31, 2004:

Range of	Stock Options	Weighted Average
Exercise Prices	Exercisable	Exercise Price
$33.87-$49.99	373,000	$	42.37
$50.00-$74.99	737,000	$	60.86
$75.00-$99.99	166,000	$	98.36
$100.00-$127.00	515,000	$	111.44

The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively: risk-free interest rates of 4.5%, 3.7% and 4.2%; expected dividend yields of 1.0%, 1.4% and 1.3%; expected lives of 7.3 years, 8.6 years and 8.6 years, and expected volatility of 31.8%, 31.7% and 29.9%.

U.S. Cellular has granted key employees restricted shares of stock that fully vest after three years. The number of shares granted were 86,000, 142,000 and 87,000 in the years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The weighted-average values of the shares granted were $38.65, $23.70 and $39.71 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The expenses included in operating income due to grants of restricted shares were $4.2 million, $2.8 million and $1.6 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

U.S. Cellular has established stock option plans that provide for the grant of stock options to officers and employees and has reserved 6,256,000 Common Shares at December 31, 2004 for options granted and to be granted to key employees. The options under the plan are exercisable from the date of vesting through 2005 to 2014, or 30 days following the date of the employee’s termination of employment, if earlier.

65

A summary of the status of U.S. Cellular’s stock option plans at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and changes during the years then ended is presented in the table and narrative as follows:

					Weighted
					Average
			Weighted		Black-Scholes
	Number		Average		Values of
	of Shares		Option Prices		Option Grants
Stock options:
Outstanding December 31, 2001 (200,000 exercisable)	884,000		$	50.42
Granted	869,000		$	38.80	$	19.74
Exercised	(9,000	)	$	29.45
Canceled	(201,000	)	$	47.17
Outstanding December 31, 2002 (336,000 exercisable)	1,543,000		$	45.15
Granted	1,435,000		$	23.85	$	10.99
Exercised	(2,000	)	$	24.37
Canceled	(448,000	)	$	40.18
Outstanding December 31, 2003 (496,000 exercisable)	2,528,000		$	33.87
Granted	796,000		$	37.46	$	16.27
Exercised	(220,000	)	$	27.26
Canceled	(248,000	)	$	32.97
Outstanding December 31, 2004 (883,000 exercisable)	2,856,000		$	35.44

At December 31, 2004, 883,000 stock options were exercisable, have exercise prices between $23.61 and $73.31 and a weighted average exercise price of $41.33. The weighted average exercise price of options exercisable at December 31, 2003 and 2002, was $46.22 and $46.71, respectively.

The following table provides certain details concerning U.S. Cellular stock options outstanding at December 31, 2004:

				Weighted Average
Range of Exercise Prices	Stock Options Outstanding	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Contractual Life Remaining (Years)
$23.20-$36.99	1,405,000	$	26.04	8.2
$37.00-$49.99	1,221,000	$	40.60	7.9
$50.00-$73.31	230,000	$	65.76	4.8

The following table provides certain details concerning U.S. Cellular stock options exercisable at December 31, 2004:

Range of	Stock Options	Weighted Average
Exercise Prices	Exercisable	Exercise Price
$23.61-$36.99	275,000	$	25.53
$37.00-$49.99	452,000	$	42.50
$50.00-$73.31	156,000	$	66.23

The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively: risk-free interest rates of 3.6%, 3.7% and 4.6%; expected dividend yield of zero for all years; expected lives of 6.6 years, 9.3 years and 9.4 years, and expected volatility of 36.0%, 29.4% and 39.4%.

21 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Pension Plan

TDS sponsors a qualified noncontributory defined contribution pension plan. The plan provides benefits for the employees of TDS Corporate, TDS Telecom and U.S. Cellular. Under this plan, pension costs are calculated separately for each participant and are funded currently. Total pension costs were $12.3 million, $12.1 million and $11.0 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

TDS also sponsors an unfunded nonqualified deferred supplemental executive retirement plan to supplement the benefits under the plan to offset the reduction of benefits caused by the limitation on annual employee compensation under the tax laws.

Other Post-Retirement Benefits

TDS sponsors two defined benefit post-retirement plans that cover most of the employees of TDS Corporate, TDS Telecom and the subsidiaries of TDS Telecom. One plan provides medical benefits and the other provides life insurance benefits. Both plans are contributory, with retiree contributions adjusted annually. The medical plan anticipates future cost sharing changes that reflect TDS’s intent to increase retiree contributions as a portion of total cost.

Total accumulated contributions to fund the costs of future retiree medical benefits are restricted to an amount not to exceed 25 percent of the total accumulated contributions to the pension trust. An additional contribution equal to a reasonable amortization of the past service cost may be made without regard to the 25 percent limitation.

The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of the benefit obligation and the fair value of plan assets for the other post-retirement benefit plans.

December 31,	2004			2003
(Dollars in thousands)
Change in benefit obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	43,154		$	36,007
Service cost	2,362			1,676
Interest cost	2,674			2,480
Acquisitions	—			2,581
Amendments	(4,425		)	(6,448		)
Actuarial loss	4,764			8,197
Benefits paid	(2,265		)	(1,339		)
Special termination benefits (1)	616			—
Benefit obligation at end of year	46,880			43,154
Change in plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year	16,442			14,659
Actual return on plan assets	2,084			3,076
Employer contribution	7,018			46
Benefits paid	(2,265		)	(1,339		)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year	23,279			16,442
Funded status	(23,601		)	(26,712		)
Unrecognized net actuarial loss	24,281			20,444
Unrecognized prior service cost	(10,989		)	(7,278		)
(Accrued) benefit cost	$	(10,309	)	$	(13,546	)

(1)Due to an early retirement incentive program that was offered to certain employees at TDS Telecom during 2003.

Net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 includes the following components.

Year Ended December 31,	2004			2003			2002
(Dollars in thousands)
Service cost	$	2,362		$	1,676		$	1,249
Interest cost on accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation	2,674			2,480			1,967
Expected return on plan assets	(1,776		)	(1,197		)	(1,487		)
Amortization of:
Unrecognized prior service cost (1)	(715		)	(128		)	(128		)
Unrecognized net loss (gain) (2)	949			494			—
Net post-retirement (income) cost	$	3,494		$	3,325		$	1,601

(1)Based on straight-line amortization over the average time remaining before active employees become fully eligible for plan benefits.

(2)Based on straight-line amortization over the average time remaining before active employees retire.

The following assumptions were used to determine benefit obligations and net periodic benefit cost.

December 31,	2004		2003
Discount rate	5.75	%	6.25	%
Expected return on plan assets	8.5	%	8.5	%

66

The measurement date for actuarial determination was December 31, 2004. For measurement purposes, a 12.0% annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits was assumed for 2004 and 2003. The 2004 annual rate of increase is expected to reduce to 10.9% in 2005 and then decrease to 5.25% by 2010, while the 2003 annual rate of increase was expected to remain at 12.0% in 2004 and then decrease to 5.25% by 2010.

The health care cost trend rate assumption has a significant effect on the amounts reported. A one percentage point increase or decrease in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects.

	One Percentage Point
	Increase		Decrease
(Dollars in thousands)
Effect on total of service and interest cost components	$	1,267	$	(1,011	)
Effect on post-retirement benefit obligation	$	9,481	$	(7,912	)

The following table describes how plan assets are invested.

Investment	Target Asset		Allocation of Plan Assets At December 31,
Category	Allocation		2004		2003
U.S. Equities	50	%	49.8	%	49.7	%
International Equities	15	%	15.1	%	15.1	%
Debt Securities	35	%	35.1	%	35.2	%

The post-retirement benefit fund engages multiple asset managers to ensure proper diversification of the investment portfolio within each asset category. The investment objective is to exceed the rate of return of a performance index comprised of 50% Wilshire 5000 Stock Index, 15% MSCI World (excluding U.S.) Stock Index, and 35% Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index. Historical average annual rates of return for this index exceed 8.5%, the expected rate of return used for planning.

The post-retirement benefit fund does not hold any debt or equity securities issued by TDS, U.S. Cellular or any related parties.

TDS is not required to set aside current funds for its future retiree health and life insurance benefits. The decision to contribute to the plan assets is based upon several factors, including the funded status of the plan, market conditions, alternative investment opportunities, tax benefits and other circumstances. TDS expects to fund $5.3 million in 2005 for the 2004 contribution to the plan.

The following estimated future benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, are expected to be paid:

Year	Post-retirement Insurance Paid
(Dollars in thousands)
2005	$	2,087
2006	1,871
2007	1,824
2008	1,905
2009	2,003
2010-2014	$	11,289

On December 8, 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the “Act”) was enacted. The Act expands Medicare coverage, primarily by adding a prescription drug benefit for Medicare-eligible participants starting in 2006.  The Act provides employers currently sponsoring prescription drug programs for Medicare-eligible participants with a range of options for coordinating with the new government-sponsored program to potentially reduce employers’ costs. These options include supplementing the government program on a secondary payor basis or accepting a direct subsidy from the government to support a portion of the cost of the employer’s program.

TDS has reviewed the impact of the Act on the TDS retiree medical plan, and has concluded that the plan is not expected to provide benefits which are the actuarial equivalent of the standard Medicare Part D benefit.  Therefore, TDS would not be eligible to receive the federal subsidy offered under the Act.

The FASB published guidance on the accounting for the government subsidy in FSP 106-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003,” that is effective beginning July 1, 2004.  As a result of the conclusion that the plan is not expected to qualify for the federal subsidy, TDS believes that the effect of the Act on the TDS retiree medical plan is not a significant event pursuant to paragraph 73 of SFAS No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Post-retirement Benefits Other Than Pensions,” and TDS did not remeasure plan assets and obligations as of the effective date of FSP 106-2.

TDS intends to clarify the plan’s design to advise participants that all retiree benefits will be coordinated with Medicare.  The effects of this plan clarification will be recognized in future periods after the changes are implemented and communicated to employees.

22 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Capital Expenditures

U.S. Cellular’s anticipated capital expenditures for 2005 primarily reflect plans for construction, system expansion and the buildout of certain of its personal communication service licensed areas. U.S. Cellular plans to finance its construction program using internally generated cash and short-term financing. U.S. Cellular’s estimated capital spending for 2005 is $570 million to $610 million. These expenditures primarily address the following needs:

•Expand and enhance U.S. Cellular’s coverage in its service areas.

•Provide additional capacity to accommodate increased network usage by current customers.

•Enhance U.S. Cellular’s retail store network and office systems.

U.S. Cellular’s overlay of its previously utilized technologies, primarily Time Division Multiple Access (“TDMA”), with Code Division Multiple Access (“CDMA-1XRTT”) technology was completed in 2004. U.S. Cellular will utilize CDMA-1XRTT technology in building out the licenses it has acquired and expects to acquire in the future from AT&T Wireless.

While U.S. Cellular does not expect a significant portion of its capital spending in 2005 to be related to the buildout of newly acquired licensed areas, it does expect that capital spending related to these areas could be significant in 2006 and over the following several years.

TDS Telecom’s estimated capital spending for 2005 is $150 million to $165 million. The incumbent local exchange companies are expected to spend $120 million to $130 million to provide for normal growth and to upgrade plant and equipment to provide enhanced services. The competitive local exchange companies are expected to spend $30 million to $35 million primarily to build switching and transmission facilities to meet the needs of a growing customer base. TDS Telecom plans to finance its construction program using primarily internally generated cash.

67

TDS Telecom currently has three fiber to the premises trials underway. First is a complete fiber build-out of a large subdivision in one of the incumbent local exchange carrier markets. Second is a combination fiber to the premises overbuild and asymmetric digital subscriber line deployment in one of the existing incumbent local exchange carrier markets.  Lastly is a fiber to the premises overbuild in a Regional Bell Operating Company market where TDS Telecom is currently a competitive local exchange carrier. The capital spending guidance provided above includes the impact of these projects that relates to 2005.

Lease Commitments

TDS and its subsidiaries have leases for certain plant facilities, office space, retail sites, cell sites and data processing equipment, most of which are classified as operating leases. Certain leases have renewal options and/or fixed rental increases. Renewal options that are reasonably assured are included in determining the lease term. For the years 2004, 2003 and 2002, rent expense for noncancelable, long-term leases was $111.8 million, $101.4 million and $69.7 million, respectively, and rent expense under cancelable, short-term leases was $11.5 million, $3.5 million and $14.2 million, respectively. Rental revenue totaled $12.0 million, $10.4 million and $8.7 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. At December 31, 2004, the aggregate minimum rental payments required and rental receipts expected under noncancelable, long-term operating leases were as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	Minimum Future Rental Payments		Minimum Future Rental Receipts
2005	$	96,850	$	11,492
2006	84,100		9,267
2007	68,187		7,172
2008	54,390		5,753
2009	38,715		3,584
Thereafter	$	205,397	$	3,566

Indemnifications

TDS enters into agreements in the normal course of business that provide for indemnification of counterparties. These include certain asset sales and financings with other parties. The term of the indemnification varies by agreement. The events or circumstances that would require TDS to perform under these indemnities are transaction specific; however, these agreements may require TDS to indemnify the counterparty for costs and losses incurred from litigation or claims arising from the underlying transaction. TDS is unable to estimate the maximum potential liability for these types of indemnifications as the amounts are dependent on the outcome of future events, the nature and likelihood of which cannot be determined at this time. Historically, TDS has not made any significant indemnification payments under such agreements.

TDS is party to an indemnity agreement with T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“T-Mobile”) regarding certain contingent liabilities at Aerial Communications, Inc. (“Aerial”) for the period prior to Aerial’s merger with VoiceStream Wireless. At December 31, 2004, TDS has recorded liabilities of $9.3 million relating to this indemnity.

Legal Proceedings

TDS is involved in legal proceedings before the Federal Communications Commission and various state and federal courts from time to time. Management does not believe that any of such proceedings will have a materially adverse impact on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of TDS.

23 DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

TDS is party to an indemnity agreement with T-Mobile (f/k/a VoiceStream Wireless) regarding certain contingent liabilities at Aerial Communications for the period prior to Aerial’s merger into VoiceStream Wireless Corporation in 2000. In 2004, TDS recorded a gain of $10.2 million ($6.4 million, net of income tax benefit of $3.8 million), or $0.11 per diluted share for a reduction in the indemnity accrual. The accrual was reduced due to favorable outcomes of federal and state tax audits which reduced the potential indemnity obligation, recorded as discontinued operations in the Statements of Operations.

During 2003, it was estimated that the indemnity for certain contingent liabilities would be greater than previously provided. TDS took an additional charge of $2.8 million ($1.6 million, net of income tax expense of $1.2 million), or $(0.03) per diluted share with respect to the additional liability, recorded as discontinued operations in the Statements of Operations.

24 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

U.S. Cellular is a limited partner in Carroll Wireless, L.P. (“Carroll Wireless”), an entity which participated in the auction of wireless spectrum designated by the FCC as Auction 58. Carroll Wireless was qualified to bid on spectrum which was available only to companies that fall under the FCC definition of “designated entities,” which are small businesses that have a limited amount of assets. Carroll Wireless was a successful bidder for 17 licensed areas in Auction 58, which ended on February 15, 2005. These 17 licensed areas cover portions of 11 states and are in markets which are either adjacent to or overlap current U.S. Cellular licensed areas.

On March 4, 2005, Carroll Wireless increased the amount on deposit with the FCC to approximately $26 million and filed an application with the FCC seeking a grant of the subject licenses.  The aggregate amount due to the FCC for the 17 licenses is $129.9 million, net of all bidding credits to which Carroll Wireless is entitled as a designated entity. U.S. Cellular consolidates Carroll Wireless for financial reporting purposes, pursuant to the guidelines of FIN 46R, as U.S. Cellular anticipates absorbing a majority of Carroll Wireless’ expected gains or losses.

Carroll Wireless is in the process of developing its long-term business and financing plans. As of March 4, 2005, U.S. Cellular has made capital contributions and advances to Carroll Wireless and/or its general partner of approximately $26 million. Pending finalization of Carroll Wireless’ permanent financing plan, and upon request by Carroll Wireless, U.S. Cellular may make capital contributions and advances to Carroll Wireless and/or its general partner of up to $130 million to fund the payments to the FCC and additional working capital.

On February 17, 2005, the TDS Board of Directors (the “TDS Board”) unanimously approved a proposal (the “Special Common Share Proposal”), to be submitted to TDS shareholders at a special meeting of shareholders of TDS scheduled for April 11, 2005, to approve an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of TDS to increase the authorized number of Special Common Shares of TDS from 20,000,000 to 165,000,000.

On February 17, 2005, the TDS Board also approved a distribution of one Special Common Share in the form of a stock dividend with respect to each outstanding Common Share and Series A Common Share of TDS (the “Distribution”), which is expected to be effective May 13, 2005 to shareholders of record on April 29, 2005, subject to the approval of the Special Common Share Proposal by shareholders, the effectiveness of the Amendment, and certain other conditions.

68

Following approval and effectiveness of the Special Common Share Proposal, at some time in the future TDS may possibly offer to issue Special Common Shares in exchange for all of the Common Shares of U.S. Cellular that are not owned by TDS (a “Possible U.S. Cellular Transaction”).  TDS currently owns approximately 82% of the shares of common stock of U.S. Cellular.  A Possible U.S. Cellular Transaction would cause U.S. Cellular to become a wholly owned subsidiary of TDS.  TDS has set no time frame for a Possible U.S. Cellular Transaction and there are no assurances that a transaction will occur.

25 BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION

TDS conducts substantially all of its wireless telephone operations through its 82.0%-owned subsidiary, U.S. Cellular. At December 31, 2004, U.S. Cellular provided cellular telephone service in 27 states to 4.9 million customers. TDS conducts its wireline telephone operations through its wholly owned subsidiary, TDS Telecommunications Corporation (“TDS Telecom”). TDS Telecom provides service through local telephone operations, or incumbent local exchange carrier companies and through competitive local exchange carrier companies. At December 31, 2004, TDS Telecom operated 111 incumbent local exchange telephone companies serving 730,400 equivalent access lines in 28 states, and a competitive local exchange carrier serving 426,800 equivalent access lines in five states.

U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom are billed for all services they receive from TDS, consisting primarily of information processing and general management services. Such billings are based on expenses specifically identified to U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom and on allocations of common expenses. Management believes the method used to allocate common expenses is reasonable and that all expenses and costs applicable to U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom are reflected in the accompanying business segment information on a basis that is representative of what they would have been if U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom operated on a stand-alone basis.

69

Financial data for TDS’s business segments for each of the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 are as follows:

	U.S.				TDS Telecom										Other Reconciling
Year Ended or at December 31, 2004 (as restated)	Cellular				ILEC			CLEC				Other (3)			Items (1)				Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Operating revenues	$		2,808,201		$		658,330	$		226,259		$		27,269	$		(16,139	)	$		3,703,920
Cost of services and products	1,049,295				166,262			92,045				18,044			(1,718			)	1,323,928
Selling, general and administrative expense	1,088,181				177,225			124,623				5,110			(14,421			)	1,380,718
Operating income before depreciation, amortization and accretion and loss on assets held for sale and impairments (2)	670,725				314,843			9,591				4,115			—				999,274
Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense	498,202				131,665			38,349				2,515			—				670,731
Loss on impairment of intangible assets	—				—			29,440				—			—				29,440
(Gain) loss on assets held for sale	(10,806			)	—			—				—			—				(10,806			)
Loss on impairment of long-lived assets	—				—			87,910				—			—				87,910
Operating income (loss)	183,329				183,178			(146,108			)	1,600			—				221,999
Significant noncash items:
Investment income	63,758				958			—				—			184				64,900
Gain (loss) on investments	25,791				12,909			—				—			(491			)	38,209
Marketable equity securities	282,829				—			—				—			3,115,975				3,398,804
Investment in unconsolidated entities	155,519				19,721			—				—			24,278				199,518
Total assets	5,179,976				1,775,968			154,287				26,992			3,875,380				11,012,603
Capital expenditures	$	656,243			$	103,069		$	35,178			$	7,394		$	4,885			$	806,769

	U.S.				TDS Telecom											Other Reconciling
Year Ended or at December 31, 2003 (as restated)	Cellular				ILEC				CLEC				Other (3)			Items (1)				Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Operating revenues	$		2,577,754		$		653,038		$		213,800		$		26,745	$		(16,163	)	$		3,455,174
Cost of services and products	933,428				165,135				86,377				17,870			(1,832			)	1,200,978
Selling, general and administrative expense	1,007,599				180,372				115,354				4,859			(14,331			)	1,293,853
Operating income before depreciation, amortization and accretion and loss on assets held for sale and impairments (2)	636,727				307,531				12,069				4,016			—				960,343
Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense	432,499				130,036				33,363				2,438			—				598,336
Loss on impairment of intangible assets	49,595				—				—				—			—				49,595
(Gain) loss on assets held for sale	45,908				—				—				—			—				45,908
Loss on impairment of long-lived assets	—				351				4,563				—			—				4,914
Operating income (loss)	108,725				177,144				(25,857			)	1,578			—				261,590
Significant noncash items:
Investment income	51,088				875				—				—			216				52,179
(Loss) on investments	(5,200			)	(5,000			)	—				—			—				(10,200			)
Marketable equity securities	260,188				—				—				—			2,512,222				2,772,410
Investment in unconsolidated entities	166,862				19,606				—				—			24,710				211,178
Total assets	4,954,718				1,807,116				238,130				22,294			3,187,590				10,209,848
Capital expenditures	$	630,864			$	111,924			$	27,294			$	732		$	5,223			$	776,037

	U.S.				TDS Telecom											Other Reconciling
Year Ended or at December 31, 2002 (as restated)	Cellular				ILEC				CLEC				Other (3)			Items (1)				Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Operating revenues	$		2,198,875		$		626,865		$		177,166		$		24,136	$		(14,495	)	$		3,012,547
Cost of services and products	736,089				142,919				85,909				16,111			(1,040			)	979,988
Selling, general and administrative expense	831,421				186,063				124,441				4,877			(13,455			)	1,133,347
Operating income before depreciation, amortization and accretion (2)	631,365				297,883				(33,184			)	3,148			—				899,212
Depreciation, amortization and accretion expense	351,595				130,232				29,059				2,045			—				512,931
Operating income (loss)	279,770				167,651				(62,243			)	1,103			—				386,281
Significant noncash items:
Investment income	42,192				530				—				—			1,077				43,799
(Loss) on investments	(295,454			)	(95,518			)	—				—			(1,497,419			)	(1,888,391			)
Marketable equity securities	185,961				—				—				—			1,758,978				1,944,939
Investment in unconsolidated entities	158,932				18,965				—				—			25,579				203,476
Total assets	4,786,633				1,857,927				248,664				25,258			2,773,543				9,692,025
Capital expenditures	$	732,376			$	116,486			$	51,919			$	7,765		$	9,581			$	918,127

(1)Consists of the TDS Corporate operations, intercompany and intracompany revenue and expense eliminations, TDS Corporate and TDS Telecom marketable equity securities and all other businesses not included in the U.S. Cellular, TDS Telecom or Other segments.

70

(2)The amount of operating income before depreciation, amortization and accretion (and loss on assets held for sale and impairments in 2004 and 2003) is a non-GAAP financial measure. The amount may also be commonly referred to by management as operating cash flow. TDS has presented operating cash flow because this financial measure, in combination with other financial measures, is an integral part of our internal reporting system utilized by management to assess and evaluate the performance of its business. Operating cash flow is also considered a significant performance measure. It is used by management as a measurement of its success in obtaining, retaining and servicing customers by reflecting its ability to generate subscriber revenue while providing a high level of customer service in a cost effective manner. The components of operating cash flow include the key revenue and expense items for which operating managers are responsible and upon which TDS evaluates its performance.

Other companies in the wireless industry may define operating cash flow in a different manner or present other varying financial measures, and, accordingly, TDS’s presentation may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.

Operating cash flow should not be construed as an alternative to operating income (loss), as determined in accordance with GAAP, as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities, as determined in accordance with GAAP, or as a measure of liquidity. TDS believes operating cash flow is useful to investors as a means to evaluate TDS’s operating performance prior to non-cash depreciation and amortization expense, and certain other non-cash charges. Although operating cash flow may be defined differently by other companies in the wireless industry, TDS believes that operating cash flow provides some commonality of measurement in analyzing operating performance of companies in the wireless industry.

(3)Represents Suttle Straus

Year Ended December 31,	2004						2003					2002
(Dollars in thousands)	(as restated)						(as restated)					(as restated)
Total operating income from reportable and other segments	$			221,999			$		261,590			$		386,281
Investment and other income and expense		(73,386			)	(139,830				)	(1,942,935				)
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest		$	148,613			$		121,760			$		(1,556,654		)

71

Reports of Management

Management’s Responsibility for Financial Statements

Management of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. has the responsibility for preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements and for their integrity and objectivity. The statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and in management’s opinion are fairly presented. The financial statements include amounts that are based on management’s best estimates and judgments. Management also prepared the other information in the annual report and is responsible for its accuracy and consistency with the financial statements.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited these consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and has expressed herein their unqualified opinion on these financial statements.

/s/ LEROY T. CARLSON, JR.	/s/ SANDRA L. HELTON	/s/ D. MICHAEL JACK
LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr.	Sandra L. Helton	D. Michael Jack
President	Executive Vice President	Senior Vice President and Controller
(Chief Executive Officer)	(Chief Financial Officer)	(Principal Accounting Officer)

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING (AS RESTATED)

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. TDS’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the issuer; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the issuer are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the issuer; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the issuer’s assets that could have a material effect on the interim or annual consolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Under the supervision and with the participation of TDS’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, TDS conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 based on the criteria in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected.  Management identified the following material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004:

1.TDS did not have a sufficient complement of personnel with an appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience and training in the application of generally accepted accounting principles commensurate with its financial reporting requirements and the complexity of its operations and transactions.  This control deficiency contributed to the material weaknesses discussed in items 2 and 3 below and the restatement of TDS’s annual consolidated financial statements for 2004, 2003 and 2002, the interim financial statements for all quarters in 2004 and 2003, the first and second quarter financial statements for 2005, as well as adjustments, including audit adjustments, to the third quarter of 2005 and the 2005 annual consolidated financial statements.  Additionally, this control deficiency could result in a misstatement of substantially all accounts and disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to TDS’s interim or annual consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.

2.TDS did not maintain effective controls over its accounting for certain vendor contracts.  Specifically, effective controls were not designed and in place to ensure that certain vendor contracts were raised to the appropriate level of accounting personnel or that accounting personnel reached the appropriate conclusions in order to accurately and timely record the effects of the contracts in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.  This control deficiency primarily affected, network operations expense, selling, general and administrative expense, accounts payable, other deferred charges and accrued liabilities.  This control deficiency resulted in the restatement of TDS’s annual consolidated financial statements for 2004, 2003 and 2002, the interim financial statements for all quarters in 2004 and 2003, the first and second quarter financial statements for 2005, as well as adjustments, including audit adjustments, to the third quarter of 2005 and the 2005 annual consolidated financial statements.  Additionally, this control deficiency could result in a misstatement of the aforementioned accounts that would result in a material misstatement to TDS’s interim or annual consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.

72

3.TDS did not maintain effective controls over the completeness, accuracy, presentation and disclosure of its accounting for income taxes, including the determination of income tax expense, income taxes payable, liabilities accrued for tax contingencies and deferred income tax assets and liabilities. Specifically, TDS did not have effective controls designed and in place to accurately calculate the income tax expense and income tax payable, monitor the difference between the income tax basis and the financial reporting basis of assets and liabilities and to reconcile the resulting basis difference to its deferred income tax asset and liability balances. This control deficiency resulted in the restatement of TDS’s annual consolidated financial statements for 2004, 2003 and 2002, the interim financial statements for all quarters in 2004 and 2003, the first and second quarter financial statements for 2005, as well as adjustments, including audit adjustments, to the third quarter of 2005 and the 2005 annual consolidated financial statements. Additionally, this control deficiency could result in a misstatement of the aforementioned accounts that would result in a material misstatement to TDS’s interim or annual consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.

In TDS’s original Annual Report on Form 10-K, management concluded that TDS maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004.  However, in connection with the restatement discussed under the heading “Restatement” in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, management has determined that the material weaknesses described above existed as of December 31, 2004.  As a result of these material weaknesses, management has determined that TDS did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the COSO.  Accordingly, management has restated this report on internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of TDS’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.

/s/ LEROY T. CARLSON, JR.	/s/ SANDRA L. HELTON	/s/ D. MICHAEL JACK
LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr.	Sandra L. Helton	D. Michael Jack
President	Executive Vice President	Senior Vice President and Controller
(Chief Executive Officer)	(Chief Financial Officer)	(Principal Accounting Officer)

73

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TO THE STOCKHOLDERS AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC.:

We have completed an integrated audit of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.’s 2004 consolidated financial statements and of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and audits of its 2003 and 2002 consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our opinions, based on our audits, are presented below.

Consolidated financial statements

In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of other auditors, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, common stockholders’ equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the financial statements of Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership, a 5.5% owned entity accounted for by the equity method of accounting. The consolidated financial statements of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. reflect an investment in this partnership of $94,700,000 and $80,500,000 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and equity earnings of $41,800,000, $29,900,000 and $21,900,000 for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004. The financial statements of Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 were audited by other auditors whose report thereon has been furnished to us, and our opinion expressed herein, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership, is based solely on the report of the other auditors. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the report of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for asset retirement costs as of January 1, 2003. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for goodwill and other intangible assets as of January 1, 2002.

As discussed under the heading “Restatement” in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has restated its 2004, 2003 and 2002 consolidated financial statements.

Internal control over financial reporting

Also, we have audited management’s assessment, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A, that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, because of the effects of (1) the Company did not have a sufficient complement of personnel with an appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience and training in the application of generally accepted accounting principles commensurate with its financial reporting requirements and the complexity of the Company’s operations and transactions, (2) the Company did not maintain effective controls over its accounting for certain vendor contracts, and (3) the Company did not maintain effective controls over the completeness, accuracy, presentation and disclosure of its accounting for income taxes including the determination of income tax expense, income taxes payable, liabilities accrued for tax contingencies and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on management’s assessment and on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. An audit of internal control over financial reporting includes obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we consider necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

74

A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. The following material weaknesses have been identified and included in management’s assessment as of December 31, 2004:

1.The Company did not have a sufficient complement of personnel with an appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience and training in the application of generally accepted accounting principles commensurate with its financial reporting requirements and the complexity of its operations and transactions.  This control deficiency contributed to the material weaknesses discussed in items 2 and 3 below and the restatement of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements for 2004, 2003 and 2002, the interim financial statements for all quarters in 2004 and 2003, the first and second quarter financial statements for 2005, as well as adjustments, including audit adjustments, to the third quarter 2005 and the 2005 annual consolidated financial statements.  Additionally, this control deficiency could result in a misstatement of substantially all accounts and disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to the Company’s interim or annual consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.

2.The Company did not maintain effective controls over its accounting for certain vendor contracts.  Specifically, effective controls were not designed and in place to ensure that certain vendor contracts were raised to the appropriate level of accounting personnel or that accounting personnel reached the appropriate conclusions in order to accurately and timely record the effects of the contracts in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.  This control deficiency primarily affected, network operations expense, selling, general and administrative expense, accounts payable, other deferred charges and accrued liabilities.  This control deficiency resulted in the restatement of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements for 2004, 2003 and 2002, the interim financial statements for all quarters in 2004 and 2003, the first and second quarter financial statements for 2005, as well as adjustments, including audit adjustments, to the third quarter of 2005 and the 2005 annual consolidated financial statements.  Additionally, this control deficiency could result in a misstatement of the aforementioned accounts that would result in a material misstatement to the Company’s interim or annual consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.

3.The Company did not maintain effective controls over the completeness, accuracy, presentation and disclosure of its accounting for income taxes, including the determination of income tax expense, income taxes payable, liabilities accrued for tax contingencies and deferred income tax assets and liabilities. Specifically, the Company did not have effective controls designed and in place to accurately calculate income tax expense and income tax payable, monitor the difference between the income tax basis and the financial reporting basis of assets and liabilities and reconcile the resulting basis difference to its deferred income tax asset and liability balances. This control deficiency resulted in the restatement of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements for 2004, 2003 and 2002, the interim financial statements for all quarters in 2004 and 2003, the first and second quarter financial statements for 2005, as well as adjustments, including audit adjustments, to the third quarter 2005 and the 2005 annual consolidated financial statements. Additionally, this control deficiency could result in a misstatement of the aforementioned accounts that would result in a material misstatement to the Company’s interim or annual consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.

These material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the December 31, 2004 consolidated financial statements, and our opinion regarding the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting does not affect our opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Management and we previously concluded that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004. However, management has subsequently determined that the material weaknesses described above existed as of December 31, 2004. Accordingly, Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting has been restated and our opinion on internal control over financial reporting, as presented herein, is different from that expressed in our previous report.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the COSO. Also, in our opinion, because of the effects of the material weaknesses described above on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the COSO.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chicago, Illinois

March 11, 2005, except for the restatement discussed under the heading “Restatement” in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements and the matter discussed in the penultimate paragraph of Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, as to which the date is April 26, 2006

75

CONSOLIDATED QUARTERLY INFORMATION AS RESTATED (UNAUDITED)

Restatement

TDS and its audit committee concluded on November 9, 2005, that TDS would amend its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 to restate its financial statements and financial information for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 including quarterly information for 2004 and 2003, and certain selected financial data for the years 2001 and 2000. TDS and its audit committee also concluded that TDS would amend its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periods ended March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2005 to restate the financial statements and financial information included therewith.

On November 11, 2005, TDS and U.S. Cellular announced that the staff of the Midwest Regional Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) had advised both companies that it was conducting an investigation into the restatement of financial statements announced by TDS and U.S. Cellular on November 10, 2005.  TDS and U.S. Cellular intend to cooperate fully with the SEC staff in this investigation.

The restatement adjustments principally correct items that were recorded in the financial statements previously but not in the proper periods and certain income tax, interest income and consolidation errors. Correction of the errors, with the exception of income taxes discussed below, individually did not have a material impact on income before income taxes and minority interest, net income or earnings per share; however, when aggregated, the items were considered to be material. The restatement adjustments to correct income tax accounting had a material impact individually on net income and earnings per share in prior periods. The restated financial statements are adjusted to record obligations in the periods such certain obligations were incurred, correct the timing of the reversal of certain tax liabilities, correct the consolidation of an 80% owned subsidiary, and record revenues in the periods such revenues were earned.  The adjustments are described below.

•      Income taxes – In the restatement, TDS corrected its income tax expense, federal and state taxes payable, liabilities accrued for tax contingencies, deferred income tax assets and liabilities and related disclosures for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 for items identified based on a reconciliation of income tax accounts.  The reconciliation compared amounts used for financial reporting purposes to the amounts used in the preparation of the income tax returns, and took into consideration the results of federal and state income tax audits and the resulting book/tax basis differences which generate deferred tax assets and liabilities.  In addition, a review of the state deferred income tax rates used to establish deferred income tax assets and liabilities identified errors in the state income tax rate used which resulted in adjustments to correct the amount of deferred income tax assets and liabilities recorded for temporary differences between the timing of when certain transactions are recognized for financial and income tax reporting.

•Federal universal service fund (“USF”) contributions – In 2004 and 2003, Universal Service Administrative Company (“USAC”) billings to U.S. Cellular for USF contributions were based on estimated revenues reported to USAC by U.S. Cellular in accordance with USAC’s established procedures. However, U.S. Cellular’s actual liability for USF is based upon its actual revenues and USAC’s established procedures provide a method to adjust U.S. Cellular’s estimated liability to its actual liability. In the first six months of 2005 and the full years of 2004 and 2003, U.S. Cellular’s actual revenues exceeded estimated revenues reported to USAC on an interim basis.  As a result, additional amounts were due to USAC in 2005 and 2004 based on U.S. Cellular’s annual report filings.  Such additional amounts were incorrectly expensed when the invoices were received from USAC rather than at the time the obligation was incurred.  In the third quarter of 2005, U.S. Cellular corrected its accounting for USF contributions to record expense reflecting the estimated obligation incurred based on actual revenues reported during the period.  Accordingly, in the restatement, TDS has adjusted previously reported USF contributions expense by U.S. Cellular to reflect the estimated liability incurred during the period. 

•Customer contract termination fees – In the fourth quarter of 2003, U.S. Cellular revised its business practices related to the billing of contract termination fees charged when a customer disconnected service prior to the end of the customer’s contract.  This change resulted in an increase in amounts billed to customers and revenues even though a high percentage of the amounts billed were deemed uncollectible. At the time of the change in business practice, U.S. Cellular incorrectly recorded revenues related to such fees at the time of billing, as generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) would preclude revenue recognition if the receivable is not reasonably assured of collection.  In the first quarter of 2005, U.S. Cellular corrected its accounting to record revenues related to such fees only upon collection, in recognition of the fact that the collectibility of the revenues was not reasonably assured at the time of billing.  In the restatement, TDS made adjustments to properly reflect U.S. Cellular’s revenues for such fees upon collection beginning October 1, 2003.

•      Leases and contracts – TDS and U.S. Cellular had entered into certain operating leases (as both lessee and lessor) that provide for specific scheduled increases in payments over the lease term. In the third quarter of 2004, TDS made adjustments for the cumulative effect which were not considered to be material to either that quarter or to prior periods to correct its accounting and to recognize revenues and expenses under such agreements on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 13, “Accounting for Leases,” as amended, and related pronouncements. In addition, the accounting for certain other long-term contracts, for which a cumulative effect adjustment was made in the first quarter of 2005, was corrected to recognize expenses in the appropriate periods. The restatement adjustments reverse the cumulative amounts previously recorded in the third quarter of 2004 and the first quarter of 2005, and properly record such revenues and expenses on a straight-line basis in the appropriate periods.

•Promotion rebates – From time to time, U.S. Cellular’s sales promotions include rebates on sales of handsets to customers.  In such cases, U.S. Cellular reduces revenues and records a liability at the time of sale reflecting an estimate of rebates to be paid under the promotion.  Previously, the accrued liability was not adjusted on a timely basis upon expiration of the promotion to reflect the actual amount of rebates paid based upon information available at the date the financial statements were issued.  In the restatement,  TDS has corrected revenues and accrued liabilities to reflect the impacts associated with promotion rebates in the appropriate periods.

76

•Operations of consolidated partnerships managed by a third party – Historically, U.S. Cellular recorded the results of operations of certain consolidated partnerships managed by a third party on an estimated basis, and adjusted such estimated results to the actual results upon receipt of financial statements in the following quarter. However, GAAP requires that the actual amounts be used. In the restatement, TDS has corrected its financial statements to recognize results of operations in the appropriate period based on the partnerships’ actual results of operations reported for such periods.

•Investment income from entities accounted for by the equity method – Historically, U.S. Cellular recorded an estimate each quarter of its proportionate share of net income (loss) from certain entities accounted for by the equity method, and adjusted such estimate to the actual share of net income (loss) upon receipt of financial statements in the following quarter. However, GAAP requires that actual amounts be used. In the restatement, TDS has corrected its financial statements to recognize investment income in the appropriate period based on the entities’ actual net income (loss) reported for such periods.

•      Historically, TDS had not fully consolidated its 80%-owned subsidiary, Suttle Straus, to present the operating results of such subsidiary in revenues, cost of service, selling, general and administrative expenses and depreciation. Previously, the net operating results of the subsidiary were included in other income (expense).  However, the non-operating portion of the income statement of Suttle Straus was properly presented. The restatement correctly consolidated the results of Suttle Straus. Also, property, plant and equipment was corrected to properly include Suttle Straus’ fixed assets.  Previously, the balances were included in other assets and deferred charges. In addition, certain intercompany elimination entries between TDS, U.S. Cellular, TDS Telecom and Suttle Straus have been recorded.

•Revenue and cost of service accruals – TDS Telecom reviewed accruals in the first and second quarter of 2004 and determined that an adjustment was required to record unbilled revenue related to its competitive local exchange carrier that were not previously recorded.  TDS Telecom also reduced cost of service accruals related to long-distance service as a result of shifting long-distance traffic to a second provider. In the restatement, the adjustments reverse the cumulative amounts previously recorded in the first and second quarters of 2004, and record such revenues and expenses in the appropriate periods.

•      Consolidated statements of cash flows – In the restatement, the classification of cash distributions received from unconsolidated entities has been corrected to properly reflect cash received, which represents a return on investment in the unconsolidated entities, as cash flows from operating activities; previously, the cash received on such investments was classified as cash flows from investing activities. Also, the classification of certain noncash stock-based compensation expense has been corrected to properly reflect such noncash expense as an adjustment to cash flows from operating activities; previously, such expense was classified as cash flows from financing activities.

•Interest income – In the restatement, TDS corrected its accounting for recording interest income earned by its subsidiaries through a cash management agreement for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.  TDS subsidiaries participating in the cash management agreement had not recorded an accrual to increase cash and interest income for their portion of the interest income earned.  The correcting entries increased cash and interest income for each period presented.

•Other items – In addition to the adjustments described above, TDS recorded a number of other adjustments to correct and record revenues and expenses in the periods in which such revenues and expenses were earned or incurred. These adjustments were not significant, either individually or in aggregate.

The table below summaries the impact on income from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest as a result of the restatement.

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2004			Three Months Ended June 30, 2004			Three Months Ended September 30, 2004			Three Months Ended December 31, 2004
	(Increase (decrease) dollars in thousands)
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes and Minority Interest, as previously reported	$	43,345		$	81,850		$	44,185		$	(20,034	)
Federal universal service fund contributions	1,591			(1,704		)	5,132			(2,046		)
Customer contract termination fees	(151		)	(84		)	(379		)	15
Leases and contracts	(397		)	(847		)	5,739			(521		)
Promotion rebates	—			—			719			308
Operations of consolidated partnerships managed by a third party	270			(1,064		)	2,655			(678		)
Investment income from entities accounted for by the equity method	(504		)	(2,064		)	(1,262		)	462
Revenue and cost of service accruals	(3,166		)	(2,536		)	—			—
Interest income	(116		)	50			(112		)	1,276
Other items	(274		)	(58		)	1,710			(2,697		)
Total adjustment	(2,747		)	(8,307		)	14,202			(3,881		)
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes and Minority Interest, as restated	$	40,598		$	73,543		$	58,387		$	(23,915	)

77

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2003				Three Months Ended June 30, 2003					Three Months Ended September 30, 2003				Three Months Ended December 31, 2003
	(Increase (decrease) dollars in thousands)
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations Before Income taxes and Minority Interest, as previously reported	$		908		$		(182	)		$		95,692		$		34,318
Federal universal service fund contributions	—				(258			)		(2,381			)	(1,981				)
Customer contract termination fees	—				—					—				(2,992				)
Leases and contracts	(489			)	(627			)		(909			)	(853				)
Promotion rebates	—				—					—				—
Operations of consolidated partnerships managed by a third party	(633			)	1,137					163				(912				)
Investment income from entities accounted for by the equity method	(1,856			)	(656			)		1,970				(433				)
Revenue and cost of service accruals	91				1,053					1,084				1,238
Interest income	(50			)	(26			)	217					133
Other items	(1,043			)	(856			)	(1,045				)	1,938
Total adjustment	(3,980			)	(233			)	(901				)	(3,862			)
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations Before Income taxes and Minority Interest, as restated	$	(3,072		)	$	(415		)	$		94,791			$	30,456

The tables below summarize the net income and earnings per share impacts from the restatement.

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2004						Three Months Ended June 30, 2004						Three Months Ended September 30, 2004						Three Months Ended December 31, 2004
	Net Income (loss)			Diluted Earnings Per Share			Net Income (loss)			Diluted Earnings Per Share			Net Income (loss)			Diluted Earnings Per Share			Net Income (loss)			Diluted Earnings Per Share
	(Increase (decrease) dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
As previously reported	$	19,732		$	0.34		$	41,394		$	0.72		$	25,151		$	0.43		$	(37,273	)	$	(0.65	)
Federal universal service fund contributions	762			0.01			(816		)	(0.01		)	2,357			0.04			(978		)	(0.02		)
Customer contract termination fees	(70		)	—			(38		)	—			(177		)	—			6			—
Leases and contracts	(156		)	—			(434		)	(0.01		)	3,013			0.05			(251		)	—
Promotion rebates	—			—			—			—			334			—			145			—
Operations of consolidated partnerships managed by a third party	98			—			(389		)	—			965			0.02			(244		)	—
Investment income from entities accounted for by the equity method	(250		)	—			(1,025		)	(0.02		)	(626		)	(0.01		)	229			—
Revenue and cost of service accruals	(1,915		)	(0.03		)	(1,534		)	(0.03		)	—			—			—			—
Income taxes	250			—			174			—			11,409			0.20			7,088			0.13
Interest income	(70		)	—			30			—			(68		)	—			772			0.01
Other items	(127		)	—			(24		)	—			1,015			0.02			(1,607		)	(0.03		)
Total adjustment	(1,478		)	(0.02		)	(4,056		)	(0.07		)	18,222			0.32			5,160			0.09
As restated	$	18,254		$	0.32		$	37,338		$	0.65		$	43,373		$	0.75		$	(32,113	)	$	(0.56	)

78

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2003						Three Months Ended June 30, 2003						Three Months Ended September 30, 2003						Three Months Ended December 31, 2003
	Net Income (loss)			Diluted Earnings Per Share			Net Income (loss)			Diluted Earnings Per Share			Net Income (loss)			Diluted Earnings Per Share			Net Income (loss)			Diluted Earnings Per Share
	(Increase (decrease) dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
As previously reported	$	(15,834	)	$	(0.27	)	$	(5,155	)	$	(0.09	)	$	41,807		$	0.72		$	25,790		$	0.44
Federal universal service fund contributions	—			—			(53		)	—			(1,099		)	(0.02		)	(920		)	(0.02		)
Customer contract termination fees	—			—			—			—			—			—			(1,374		)	(0.02		)
Leases and contracts	(252		)	(0.01		)	(321		)	(0.01		)	(461		)	(0.01		)	(433		)	(0.01		)
Promotion rebates	—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Operations of consolidated partnerships managed by a third party	(232		)	—			413			0.01			61			—			(332		)	(0.01		)
Investment income from entities accounted for by the equity method	(923		)	(0.02		)	(326		)	(0.01		)	979			0.02			(215		)	—
Revenue and cost of service accruals	55			—			637			0.02			656			0.01			749			0.02
Income taxes	313			0.01			14			—			(292		)	—			(10,721		)	(0.19		)
Interest income	(30		)	—			(16		)	—			131			—			80			—
Other items	(496		)	(0.01		)	(407		)	(0.01		)	(502		)	(0.01		)	830			0.02
Total adjustment	(1,565		)	(0.03		)	(59		)	—			(527		)	(0.01		)	(12,336		)	(0.21		)
As restated	$	(17,399	)	$	(0.30	)	$	(5,214	)	$	(0.09	)	$	41,280		$	0.71		$	13,454		$	0.23

79

A summary of the significant effects of the restatement is as follows:

	Quarter Ended or at March 31, 2004								Quarter Ended or at June 30, 2004
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	As Previously Reported				As Restated				As Previously Reported				As Restated
Statements of Operations
Operating Revenue	$		870,512		$		870,098		$		934,588		$		929,086
Operating Expenses
Cost of service and products	311,393				321,079				317,230				322,481
Selling, general and administrative	330,643				322,053				343,058				337,558
Depreciation, amortization and accretion	155,452				156,197				164,411				165,009
(Gain) loss on assets held for sale	(143			)	(143			)	(582			)	(582			)
Total Operating Expenses	797,345				799,186				824,117				824,466
Operating Income (Loss)	73,167				70,912				110,471				104,620
Investment and Other Income (Expense)	(29,822			)	(30,314			)	(28,621			)	(31,077			)
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes and Minority Interest	43,345				40,598				81,850				73,543
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations	19,732				18,254				41,394				37,338
Net Income (Loss)	$	19,732			$	18,254			$	41,394			$	37,338
Basic Earnings per Share:
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations	$	0.34			$	0.32			$	0.72			$	0.65
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common	$	0.34			$	0.32			$	0.72			$	0.65
Diluted Earnings per Share:
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations	$	0.34			$	0.32			$	0.72			$	0.65
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common	$	0.34			$	0.32			$	0.72			$	0.65
Balance Sheets
Current Assets	$	1,600,847			$	1,604,234			$	1,959,552			$	1,960,162
Investments	5,122,926				5,138,674				5,064,948				5,078,633
Property, Plant and Equipment, net	3,328,129				3,356,182				3,368,863				3,396,635
Other Assets and Deferred Charges	85,696				54,913				94,256				63,718
Total Assets	$	10,137,598			$	10,154,003			$	10,487,619			$	10,499,148
Current Liabilities	$	675,241			$	679,816			$	1,018,165			$	1,025,167
Deferred Liabilities and Credits	2,179,928				2,205,766				2,163,271				2,186,841
Long-Term Debt	3,669,310				3,669,310				3,681,868				3,681,868
Minority Interest in Subsidiaries	481,181				480,104				490,797				488,699
Preferred Shares	3,864				3,864				3,864				3,864
Common Stockholders’ Equity	3,128,074				3,115,143				3,129,654				3,112,709
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	10,137,598			$	10,154,003			$	10,487,619			$	10,499,148

80

	Quarter Ended or at September 30, 2004								Quarter Ended or at December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	As Previously Reported				As Restated				As Previously Reported				As Restated
Statements of Operations
Operating Revenue	$		968,780		$		964,416		$		946,509		$		940,320
Operating Expenses
Cost of service and products	349,024				349,222				326,524				331,146
Selling, general and administrative	375,314				355,714				371,952				365,393
Depreciation, amortization and accretion	169,462				170,177				178,631				179,348
Loss on impairment of intangible assets	—				—				29,440				29,440
Loss on impairment of long-lived assets	—				—				87,910				87,910
(Gain) loss on assets held for sale	—				—				(10,081			)	(10,081			)
Total Operating Expenses	893,800				875,113				984,376				983,156
Operating Income (Loss)	74,980				89,303				(37,867			)	(42,836			)
Investment and Other Income (Expense)	(30,795			)	(30,916			)	17,833				18,921
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes and Minority Interest	44,185				58,387				(20,034			)	(23,915			)
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations	20,800				39,022				(39,284			)	(34,124			)
Discontinued operations, net of tax	4,351				4,351				2,011				2,011
Net Income (Loss)	$	25,151			$	43,373			$	(37,273		)	$	(32,113		)
Basic Earnings per Share:
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations	$	0.36			$	0.68			$	(0.69		)	$	(0.60		)
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common	$	0.44			$	0.76			$	(0.65		)	$	(0.56		)
Diluted Earnings per Share:
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations	$	0.35			$	0.67			$	(0.69		)	$	(0.60		)
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common	$	0.43			$	0.75			$	(0.65		)	$	(0.56		)
Balance Sheets
Current Assets	$	1,685,070			$	1,687,484			$	1,810,217			$	1,817,714
Investments	5,144,772				5,158,679				5,705,581				5,718,464
Property, Plant and Equipment, net	3,344,072				3,374,751				3,385,481				3,419,444
Other Assets and Deferred Charges	90,398				56,984				92,562				56,981
Assets of Operations Held for Sale	115,970				114,485				—				—
Total Assets	$	10,380,282			$	10,392,383			$	10,993,841			$	11,012,603
Current Liabilities	$	747,492			$	738,115			$	741,323			$	729,471
Deferred Liabilities and Credits	2,242,989				2,263,147				2,894,357				2,919,361
Long-Term Debt	3,682,499				3,682,499				3,664,243				3,664,243
Liabilities of Operations Held for Sale	4,216				4,216				—				—
Minority Interest in Subsidiaries	502,419				502,742				499,306				499,468
Preferred Shares	3,864				3,864				3,864				3,864
Common Stockholders’ Equity	3,196,803				3,197,800				3,190,748				3,196,196
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	10,380,282			$	10,392,383			$	10,993,841			$	11,012,603

81

	Quarter Ended or at March 31, 2003								Quarter Ended or at June 30, 2003
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	As Previously Reported				As Restated				As Previously Reported				As Restated
Statements of Operations
Operating Revenue	$		815,278		$		818,664		$		857,414		$		863,087
Operating Expenses
Cost of service and products	286,276				291,269				285,406				289,994
Selling, general and administrative	320,483				320,466				331,484				330,594
Depreciation, amortization and accretion	151,227				151,462				144,902				145,962
Loss on impairment of intangible assets	—				—				49,595				49,595
(Gain) loss on assets held for sale	21,561				21,561				3,500				3,500
Total Operating Expenses	779,547				784,758				814,887				819,645
Operating Income	35,731				33,906				42,527				43,442
Investment and Other Income (Expense)	(34,823			)	(36,978			)	(42,709			)	(43,857			)
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes and Minority Interest	908				(3,072			)	(182			)	(415			)
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations	(4,045			)	(5,610			)	(5,155			)	(5,214			)
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax and minority interest	(11,789			)	(11,789			)	—				—
Net Income (Loss)	$	(15,834		)	$	(17,399		)	$	(5,155		)	$	(5,214		)
Basic Earnings per Share:
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations	$	(0.07		)	$	(0.10		)	$	(0.09		)	$	(0.09		)
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common	$	(0.27		)	$	(0.30		)	$	(0.09		)	$	(0.09		)
Diluted Earnings per Share:
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations	$	(0.07		)	$	(0.10		)	$	(0.09		)	$	(0.09		)
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common	$	(0.27		)	$	(0.30		)	$	(0.09		)	$	(0.09		)
Balance Sheets
Current Assets	$	1,907,412			$	1,911,419			$	1,921,163			$	1,925,627
Investments	4,031,527				4,047,108				4,574,968				4,589,894
Property, Plant and Equipment, net	3,184,416				3,215,588				3,241,703				3,271,962
Other Assets and Deferred Charges	292,313				258,362				96,459				63,530
Assets of Operations Held for Sale	226,422				226,422				223,876				223,876
Total Assets	$	9,642,090			$	9,658,899			$	10,058,169			$	10,074,889
Current Liabilities	$	1,152,534			$	1,153,089			$	1,250,710			$	1,250,685
Deferred Liabilities and Credits	1,397,299				1,409,520				1,754,310				1,767,404
Long-Term Debt	3,300,293				3,300,293				3,231,910				3,231,910
Trust Originated Preferred Securities	300,000				300,000				300,000				300,000
Liabilities of Operations Held for Sale	9,823				9,823				9,005				9,005
Minority Interest in Subsidiaries	485,676				485,771				487,849				487,460
Preferred Shares	6,804				6,804				6,704				6,704
Common Stockholders’ Equity	2,989,661				2,993,599				3,017,681				3,021,721
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	9,642,090			$	9,658,899			$	10,058,169			$	10,074,889

82

	Quarter Ended or at September 30, 2003								Quarter Ended or at December 31, 2003
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	As Previously Reported				As Restated				As Previously Reported				As Restated
Statements of Operations
Operating Revenue	$		882,387		$		887,542		$		890,137		$		885,881
Operating Expenses
Cost of service and products	294,372				299,364				316,831				320,351
Selling, general and administrative	311,170				313,202				335,157				329,591
Depreciation, amortization and accretion	144,238				144,942				155,365				155,970
Loss on impairment of long-lived assets	—				—				4,914				4,914
(Gain) loss on assets held for sale	(1,442			)	(1,442			)	22,289				22,289
Total Operating Expenses	748,338				756,066				834,556				833,115
Operating Income	134,049				131,476				55,581				52,766
Investment and Other Income (Expense)	(38,357			)	(36,685			)	(21,263			)	(22,310			)
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes and Minority Interest	95,692				94,791				34,318				30,456
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations	43,416				42,889				25,790				13,454
Discontinued operations, net of tax	(1,609			)	(1,609			)	—				—
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax and minority interest	—				—				—				—
Net Income (Loss)	$	41,807			$	41,280			$	25,790			$	13,454
Basic Earnings per Share:
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations	$	0.76			$	0.75			$	0.45			$	0.23
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common	$	0.73			$	0.72			$	0.45			$	0.23
Diluted Earnings per Share:
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations	$	0.75			$	0.74			$	0.44			$	0.23
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common	$	0.72			$	0.71			$	0.44			$	0.23
Balance Sheets
Current Assets	$	1,489,145			$	1,494,516			$	1,504,946			$	1,508,647
Investments	4,667,623				4,684,519				5,152,958				5,169,379
Property, Plant and Equipment, net	3,279,858				3,308,911				3,350,986				3,378,648
Other Assets and Deferred Charges	88,405				55,576				83,925				52,651
Assets of Operations Held for Sale	—				—				100,523				100,523
Total Assets	$	9,525,031			$	9,543,522			$	10,193,338			$	10,209,848
Current Liabilities	$	1,031,936			$	1,033,576			$	696,945			$	699,432
Deferred Liabilities and Credits	1,704,868				1,719,221				2,240,853				2,267,195
Long-Term Debt	3,233,843				3,233,843				3,667,675				3,667,675
Trust Originated Preferred Securities	—				—				—				—
Liabilities of Operations Held for Sale	—				—				2,427				2,427
Minority Interest in Subsidiaries	502,665				501,388				502,702				501,517
Preferred Shares	6,554				6,554				3,864				3,864
Common Stockholders’ Equity	3,045,165				3,048,940				3,078,872				3,067,738
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	9,525,031			$	9,543,522			$	10,193,338			$	10,209,848

83

Selected Consolidated Financial Data (Unaudited)

Year Ended or at December 31,	2004 (as restated)				2003 (as restated)				2002 (as restated)				2001 (as restated)				2000 (as restated)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Operating Data
Operating revenues	$		3,703,920		$		3,455,174		$		3,012,547		$		2,588,618		$		2,327,675
Operating income	221,999				261,590				386,281				435,277				419,052
Gain (loss) on investments	38,209				(10,200			)	(1,888,391			)	(548,305			)	15,941
Income (loss) from continuing operations	60,490				45,519				(953,049			)	(155,603			)	114,078
Discontinued operations, net of tax	6,362				(1,609			)	—				(24,092			)	2,072,277
Cumulative effect of accounting change	—				(11,789			)	(7,035			)	—				(3,841			)
Net income (loss) available to common	$	66,649			$	31,704			$	(960,511		)	$	(180,153		)	$	2,182,010
Basic weighted average shares outstanding (000s)	57,296				57,721				58,644				58,661				59,922
Basic earnings per share from:
Continuing operations	$	1.05			$	0.78			$	(16.26		)	$	(2.66		)	$	1.90
Discontinued operations	0.11				(0.03			)	—				(0.41			)	34.57
Cumulative effect of accounting change	—				(0.20			)	(0.12			)	—				(0.06			)
Income (loss) available to common	$	1.16			$	0.55			$	(16.38		)	$	(3.07		)	$	36.41
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding (000s)	57,567				57,875				58,644				58,661				60,611
Diluted earnings per share from:
Continuing operations	$	1.04			$	0.77			$	(16.26		)	$	(2.66		)	$	1.87
Discontinued operations	0.11				(0.03			)	—				(0.41			)	34.18
Cumulative effect of accounting change	—				(0.20			)	(0.12			)	—				(0.06			)
Income (loss) available to common	$	1.15			$	0.54			$	(16.38		)	$	(3.07		)	$	35.99
Dividends per Common and Series A Common Share	$	0.66			$	0.62			$	0.58			$	0.54			$	0.50
Pro forma (a)
Net income (loss)	N/A				$	43,910			$	(962,633		)	$	(181,665		)	$	2,180,808
Basic earnings (loss) per share	N/A				0.76				(16.41			)	(3.10			)	36.39
Diluted earnings (loss) per share	N/A				$	0.76			$	(16.41		)	$	(3.10		)	$	35.97
Balance Sheet Data
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,171,105			$	940,578			$	1,301,599			$	141,594			$	101,066
Marketable equity securities	3,398,804				2,772,410				1,944,939				2,700,230				4,121,904
Property, plant and equipment, net	3,419,444				3,378,648				3,229,000				2,544,077				2,171,365
Total assets	11,012,603				10,209,848				9,692,025				8,097,122				8,686,759
Notes payable	30,000				—				461,792				265,300				499,000
Long-term debt (excluding current portion)	1,974,599				1,994,913				1,641,624				1,507,764				1,172,987
Prepaid forward contracts	1,689,644				1,672,762				1,656,616				—				—
Common stockholders’ equity	3,196,196				3,067,738				3,047,565				3,490,447				3,892,545
Capital expenditures	$	806,769			$	776,037			$	918,127			$	700,216			$	456,700
Current ratio (b)	2.5				2.2				1.7				0.8				0.5
Return on average equity (c)	1.9			%	1.5			%	(29.2			)%	(4.2			)%	3.6			%

Results from previous years have been restated to conform to current period presentation.

(a)Pro forma amounts reflect the effect of the retroactive application of the change in accounting principle for the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations” in 2003. Therefore, no pro forma amounts are required in 2004.

(b)Current ratio is calculated by dividing current assets by current liabilities. These amounts are taken directly from the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(c)Return on average equity is calculated by dividing income (loss) from continuing operations by the average of beginning and ending common shareholders’ equity. Those amounts are taken from the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Balance Sheets. The result is shown as a percentage.

84

TDS STOCK AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION

TDS’s Common Shares are listed on the American Stock Exchange (“AMEX”) under the symbol “TDS” and in the newspapers as “TeleData.” As of January 31, 2005, TDS Common Shares were held by 2,058 record owners and the Series A Common Shares were held by 87 record owners. TDS has paid cash dividends on Common Shares since 1974, and paid dividends of $0.66 and $0.62 per Common and Series A Common Share during 2004 and 2003, respectively.

The Common Shares of United States Cellular Corporation, an 82.0%-owned subsidiary of TDS, are listed on the AMEX under the symbol “USM” and in the newspapers as “US Cellu.”

MARKET PRICE PER TDS COMMON SHARE BY QUARTER

TDS’s Series A Common Shares and Preferred Shares are not actively traded and therefore, quotations are not reported for such securities. Dividends on TDS’s Preferred Shares have been paid quarterly since the dates of issue. The high, low and closing sales prices of the TDS Common Shares on the AMEX as reported by the Dow Jones News Service are as follows:

2004	1st		2nd		3rd		4th
High	$	74.52	$	72.42	$	85.07	$	85.25
Low	62.06		64.90		68.40		71.70
Quarter-end close	70.87		71.20		84.17		76.95
Dividends paid	$	0.165	$	0.165	$	0.165	$	0.165
2003	1st		2nd		3rd		4th
High	$	48.98	$	51.23	$	59.65	$	64.02
Low	35.16		40.85		49.85		56.64
Quarter-end close	40.91		49.70		56.54		62.55
Dividends paid	$	0.155	$	0.155	$	0.155	$	0.155

85

EX-23.1

Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos.  333-125000, 333-125002, 333-125003, 333-125004, 333-58127, 33-57257, 33-64035, 333-103541, 333-58121, 333-105676, 333-103540, and 333-71688), in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-125001, 33-8857, 33-59435, 33-68456, 333-38355, and 333-71632), and in the Registration Statements on Form S-4 (File Nos. 33-45570 and 33-64293) of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. of our report dated March 11, 2005,  except for the restatement discussed under the heading “Restatement” in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements and the matter discussed in the penultimate paragraph of Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, as to which the date is April 26, 2006, relating to the financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 11, 2005, except for Note 1, as to which the date is April 26, 2006, relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K/A.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chicago, Illinois

April 26, 2006

EX-23.2

Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-58127, No. 33-57257, No. 33-64035, No. 333-103541, No. 333-58121, No. 333-105676, No. 333-103540, No. 333-71688, No. 333-125000, No. 333-125002, No. 333-125003, and No. 333-125004 on Forms S-8, in Registration Statements No. 33-8857, No. 33-59435, No. 33-68456, No. 333-38355, No. 333-71632, and No. 333-125001 on Forms S-3, and in Registration Statements No. 33-45570 and No. 33-64293 on Forms S-4 of Telephone and Data Systems Inc. of our report dated March 10, 2005 (relating to the financial statements of Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Telephone and Data Systems Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

New York, New York

April 25, 2006

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

I, LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., certify that:

1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 26, 2006
	/S/ LEROY T. CARLSON, JR.
	LEROY T. CARLSON, JR.
	President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

I, Sandra L. Helton, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 26, 2006
	/s/ SANDRA L. HELTON
	Sandra L. Helton
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63

of Title 18 of the United States Code

I, LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., the chief executive officer of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., certify that (i) the annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.

/s/ LEROY T. CARLSON, JR.

LEROY T. CARLSON, JR.

April 26, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63

of Title 18 of the United States Code

I, Sandra L. Helton, the chief financial officer of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., certify that (i) the annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.

/s/ Sandra L. Helton

Sandra L. Helton

April 26, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.