XML 45 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.24.1.u1
Goodwill
 9 Months Ended
Mar. 29, 2024
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill Goodwill
In accordance with FASB ASC 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (“ASC 350”), the Company determines its reporting units based upon whether discrete financial information is available, if management regularly reviews the operating results of the component, the nature of the products offered to customers and the market characteristics of each reporting unit. A reporting unit is considered to be an operating segment or one level below an operating segment also known as a component. Component level financial information is reviewed by management across two divisions: Mission Systems and Microelectronics. Accordingly, these were determined to be the Company's reporting units.
The Company performs its annual goodwill impairment test in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year. The Company estimates its fair value and compares the fair value with the carrying value of its reporting units, including goodwill using an income approach based upon a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) model to calculate the present value of cash flows to estimate its implied fair value. The future cash flows for the Company’s reporting units are projected based on the Company’s estimates, at that time, of future revenues, expenses, capital expenditures, and working capital. The discount rates used in the Company’s DCF model were based on a weighted-average cost of capital (“WACC”) determined from relevant market comparisons, adjusted upward for specific reporting unit risks (primarily the uncertainty of achieving projected operating cash flows). A terminal value growth rate is applied to the final year of the projected period, which reflects the Company’s estimate of stable, perpetual growth. The Company then calculated a present value of the respective cash flows for each reporting unit to arrive at an estimate of fair value under the income approach. In addition, the Company uses the market approach, which compares the reporting unit to publicly traded companies and transactions involving similar businesses, to support the conclusions of the income approach. Finally, the Company compared its estimates of fair values to its total market capitalization to assess the reasonableness of the reporting units combined determined fair value.
The Company also assesses potential triggering events during interim reporting periods. During the third quarter ended March 29, 2024, the Company assessed events and circumstances to consider its reporting units for a potential triggering event, including: macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, financial performance and expectations of projected financial performance and cash flows, changes in the Company's stock price in relation to the carrying value of its reporting units, among other relevant factors.
As a result of the sustained decline in the Company's stock and overall market capitalization during the third quarter ended March 29, 2024, along with other qualitative considerations the Company concluded that there was a triggering event for its Mission Systems reporting unit that would require an interim impairment test. As of March 29, 2024, the Company completed a quantitative goodwill impairment analysis related to its Mission Systems reporting unit by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount. In making this assessment, management relies on a number of factors including expected future operating results, business plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows, business trends, and declines in the Company's market capitalization. The Company determined the fair value of the reporting unit by using a DCF approach. Under the DCF approach, the Company estimated the future cash flows, as well as selected a risk-adjusted WACC of 8.5% to measure the present value of the anticipated cash flows. When determining future cash flow estimates, the Company considered historical results adjusted to reflect current and anticipated future operating conditions. The Company estimated cash flows for the reporting unit over a discrete period and a terminal period (considering expected long-term growth rates and trends). The Company then used the market approach to corroborate the results of the DCF approach. Under the market approach, the Company used revenue and earnings multiples based on comparable industry multiples to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value is recognized as an impairment loss.
Based on the interim quantitative evaluation, the Company determined that the Mission Systems reporting unit had an estimated fair value in excess of their carrying value of 2.5%. The Company concluded that the Mission Systems reporting unit's goodwill was not impaired. In order to evaluate the sensitivity of the estimated fair value for Mission Systems, the Company assessed an increase of 1.0% in the WACC under the DCF approach would have a material impact to the Mission Systems reporting unit's fair value determination. If there are adverse trends in the Mission Systems reporting unit's expected future operating results, business plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows, business trends, and Company's market capitalization, then it could result in the carrying value of the Mission Systems reporting unit exceeding its estimated fair value and impairment charges.