XML 39 R26.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 30, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements
 
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
 
We mitigate the risk of fluctuations in currency exchange rates on our results of operations and financial condition by entering into foreign currency cash flow hedges. We use an income approach to value our outstanding foreign currency cash flow hedges, which consists of a discounted cash flow model that takes into account the present value of future cash flows under the terms of the contracts using current market information as of the measurement date such as foreign currency spot and forward rates.  Additionally, we built an element of default risk based on observable inputs into the fair value calculation. Due to the fact that certain inputs to fair value these derivative instruments can be observed, these derivatives are classified as Level 2.

The following table provides a summary of the fair values of our derivative financial instruments measured on a recurring basis under “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (U.S. dollars in millions):
 
 
Fair Value Measurements
 
Foreign currency hedge assets
 
December 30, 2016
 
January 1, 2016
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)
$

 
$

 
 
 
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)
5.4

 
11.9

 
 
 
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

 



Refer to Note 14, “Retirement and Other Employee Benefits” for further fair value disclosures related to pension assets. 
19. Fair Value Measurements (continued)

In estimating our fair value disclosures for financial instruments, we use the following methods and assumptions:
 
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amount of these items approximates fair value due to their liquid nature and are classified as Level 1.
 
Trade accounts receivable and other accounts receivable, net: The carrying value reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for these items is net of allowances for doubtful accounts, which includes a degree of counterparty non-performance risk and are classified as Level 2.
 
Accounts payable and other current liabilities: The carrying value reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for these items approximates their fair value, which is the likely amount for which the liability with short settlement periods would be transferred to a market participant with a similar credit standing as ours and are classified as Level 2.
 
Capital lease obligations: The carrying value of our capital lease obligations reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets approximates their fair value based on current interest rates, which contain an element of default risk.  The fair value of our capital lease obligations is estimated using Level 2 inputs based on quoted prices for those or similar instruments.
Refer to Note 11, “Long-Term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations”.
 
Long-term debt: The carrying value of our long-term debt reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets approximates their fair value since they bear interest at variable rates or fixed rates which contain an element of default risk.   The fair value of our long-term debt is estimated using Level 2 inputs based on quoted prices for those or similar instruments.
Refer to Note 11, “Long-Term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations”.
 
Fair Value of Non-Financial Assets

The following is a tabular presentation of the non-recurring fair value measurement along with the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls (U.S. dollars in millions):
 
 
Fair Value Measurements for the year ended
December 30, 2016
 
Total
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Underutilized assets in Central America
$
1.0

 
$

 
$

 
$
1.0

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Philippines plantation conversion to pineapple
0.3

 

 

 
0.3

 
$
1.3

 
$

 
$

 
$
1.3



During the second and third quarters of 2016, we recognized $1.2 million in asset impairment and other charges related to certain underutilized assets in Central America. The asset impairment consisted of a write-down of $1.2 million related to the assets with a carrying value of $2.2 million. We estimated the fair value of these assets of $1.0 million using the market approach. The fair value of these assets are classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy due to the mix of unobservable inputs utilized.


19. Fair Value Measurements (continued)

During the second quarter of 2016, we recognized $2.5 million in asset impairment and other charges as a result of our decision to convert a banana plantation in the Philippines to a pineapple plantation during the next three years. The asset impairment consisted of a write-down of $2.5 million related to the plantation with a carrying value of $2.8 million. The plantation was written down to a fair value of $0.3 million. We estimated the fair value of this asset using an income based approach, whereby our cash
flows were adjusted for a market premium risk. The fair value of the plantation of $0.3 million is classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy due to the mix of unobservable inputs utilized.

The following is a tabular presentation of the non-recurring fair value measurement along with the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls (U.S. dollars in millions):
 
 
Fair Value Measurements for the year ended
January 1, 2016
 
Total
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Guatemala banana plantation assets held for sale
$
1.8

 
$

 
$

 
$
1.8

 
$
1.8

 
$

 
$

 
$
1.8



During the third quarter 2015, we recognized a charge of $1.0 million for Guatemala property, plant and equipment valued at fair value less cost to sell. The carrying value of these assets was $2.8 million and was written down to $1.8 million. These assets related predominantly to land, land improvements and banana plantations included in other current assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets due to the fact that they are expected to be sold within one year. We estimated the fair value of the underlying assets using the market approach. The fair valuation of the assets are classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy due to the mix of unobservable information.

Refer to Note 3, “Asset Impairment and Other Charges, Net” for further discussion related to asset impairment charges.