XML 39 R25.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Note 17 - Equity Method Investment in Caris HealthCare, L.P.
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2018
Notes to Financial Statements  
Cost and Equity Method Investments Disclosure [Text Block]
Note
1
7
– Equity Method Investment in Caris HealthCare, L.P.
 
As of
December 31, 2018,
we have a
75.1%
non–controlling ownership interest in Caris, a business that specializes in hospice care services in NHC owned health care centers and in other settings. The carrying value of our investment is
$30,625,000
and
$34,951,000
at
December 31, 2018
and
2017,
respectively. The carrying amounts are included in investments in limited liability companies in the consolidated balance sheets. The difference between the carrying value of our investment and our capital account balance in Caris is due to the additional limited partner ownership interest the Company acquired from current and former partners. Summarized financial information of Caris for the years ended
December 31, 2018,
2017,
and
2016
is provided below
(in thousands)
.
 
   
December 31,
 
   
2018
   
2017
   
2016
 
Current assets
  $
17,539
    $
24,582
    $
23,174
 
Noncurrent assets
   
10,266
     
10,490
     
10,673
 
Liabilities
   
8,657
     
10,113
     
9,118
 
Partners’ capital
   
19,148
     
24,959
     
24,729
 
Revenue
   
56,410
     
53,586
     
53,211
 
Expenses
   
55,507
     
46,436
     
44,091
 
Net income
   
903
     
7,150
     
9,120
 
 
Consolidation Consideration
s
 
Due to our ownership percentage in Caris, we have considered whether Caris should be consolidated by NHC under the guidance provided in ASC Topic
810,
Consolidation
. We do
not
consolidate Caris because (
1
) Caris’ equity at risk is sufficient to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, (
2
) the general partner of the Partnership has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of Caris, and (
3
) the equity holders of Caris possess the characteristics of a controlling financial interest, including voting rights that are proportional to their economic interests. Supporting the assertions above is the following: (
1
) the ownership percentage of the general partner remains equally divided between NHC and another party, (
2
) the general partner manages and controls the Partnership with full and complete discretion, and (
3
) the limited partners have
no
right or power to take part in the control of the business of the Partnership, which is where our ownership percentage increases have occurred.