Note 16 - Contingencies and Guarantees	12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2018
Notes to Financial Statements
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block]	Note 1 6 – Contingencies and Guar antees Accrued Risk Reserves We are self–insured for risks related to health insurance and have wholly–owned limited purpose insurance companies that insure risks related to workers’ compensation and general and professional liability insurance claims both for our owned or leased entities and certain of the entities to which we provide management or accounting services. The liability we have recognized for reported claims and estimates for incurred but unreported claims totals $96,024,000 and $93,275,000 at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The liability is included in accrued risk reserves in the consolidated balance sheets. The amounts are subject to adjustment for actual claims incurred. It is possible that these claims plus unasserted claims could exceed our insurance coverages and our reserves, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. As a result of the terms of our insurance policies and our use of wholly–owned limited purpose insurance companies, we have retained significant insurance risk with respect to workers’ compensation and general and professional liability. We use independent actuaries to assist management in estimating our exposures for claims obligations (for both asserted and unasserted claims) related to deductibles and exposures in excess of coverage limits, and we maintain reserves for these obligations. Such estimates are based on many variables including historical and statistical information and other factors. Workers ’ Compensation For workers’ compensation, we utilize a wholly–owned Tennessee domiciled property/casualty insurance company to write coverage for NHC affiliates and for third–party customers. Policies are written for a duration of twelve months and cover only risks related to workers’ compensation losses. All customers are companies which operate in the long–term care industry. Business is written on a direct basis. For direct business, coverage is written for statutory limits and the insurance company’s losses in excess of $1,000,000 per claim are covered by reinsurance. General and Professional Liability Insurance and Lawsuits The senior care industry has experienced significant increases in both the number of personal injury/wrongful death claims and in the severity of awards based upon alleged negligence by skilled nursing facilities and their employees in providing care to residents. As of December 31, 2018, we and/or our managed facilities are currently defendants in 59 claims. Insurance coverage for all years includes primary policies and excess policies. The primary coverage is in the amount of $1.0 million per incident, $3.0 million per location with an annual primary policy aggregate limit that is adjusted on an annual basis. For 2018, the excess coverage is $9.0 million per occurrence. Additional insurance is purchased through third party providers that serve to supplement the coverage provided through our wholly–owned captive insurance company. There is certain additional litigation incidental to our business, none of which, based upon information available to date, would be material to our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. In addition, the long–term care industry is continuously subject to scrutiny by governmental regulators, which could result in litigation or claims related to regulatory compliance matters. Caris HealthCare, L.P. Investigation and Related Litigation On December 9, 2014, Caris Healthcare, L.P., a business that specializes in hospice care services in Company–owned health care centers and in other settings, received notice from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Tennessee and the Attorney Generals’ Offices for the State of Tennessee and State of Virginia that those government entities were conducting an investigation regarding patient eligibility for hospice services provided by Caris precipitated by a qui tam lawsuit. We have a 75.1% non–controlling ownership interest in Caris. A qui tam lawsuit was filed on May 22, 2014, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee by a former Caris employee, Barbara Hinkle, and is captioned United States of America, State of Tennessee, and State of Virginia ex rel. Barbara Hinkle v. Caris Healthcare, L.P., No. 3:14–cv–212 (E.D. Tenn.). On June 16, 2016, the State of Tennessee and the State of Virginia declined to intervene in the qui tam lawsuit. On June 20, 2016, the Court ordered that the complaint be unsealed. On October 11, 2016, the United States filed a Complaint in Intervention against Caris Healthcare, L.P. and Caris Healthcare, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Caris Healthcare, L.P. The United States' complaint alleged that Caris billed the government for ineligible hospice patients between June 2013 and December 2013 and retained overpayments regarding ineligible hospice patients from April 2010 through June 2013. On March 9, 2018, Caris and the United States jointly moved for a partial 90 -day stay of the case to allow the parties to finalize a settlement in principle of the action. That settlement was finalized on June 25, 2018, in which Caris agreed to pay $8.5 million plus interest for a full release associated with the alleged submission of false claims and alleged retention of overpayments from Medicare for hospice services provided between April 1, 2010, and December 31, 2013. On June 28, 2018, the District Court entered an Order in connection with the parties’ Joint Stipulation of Dismissal, which dismissed the action with prejudice as to the Hinkle and Hinkle’s bankruptcy trustee, with prejudice to the United States with respect to the conduct released by the settlement, and without prejudice to the United States with respect to all remaining claims. The District Court’s Order concludes this litigation. Nutritional Support Services, L.P., Qui Tam Litigation On June 19, 2018, a First Amended Complaint was filed naming Nutritional Support Services, L.P. (“NSS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, as a defendant in the action captioned U.S. ex rel. McClain v. Nutritional Support Services, L.P., No. 6:17 -cv- 2608 -AMQ (D.S.C.), which was filed in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. The action alleges that NSS violated the False Claims Act by reporting a National Drug Code (“NDC”) number that did not correspond to the NDC for dispensed prescriptions. On April 16, 2018, the United States filed a Notice of Election to Decline Intervention with respect to the allegations asserted in this action. NSS intends to vigorously defend itself with respect to this action. Governmental Regulations Laws and regulations governing the Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs are complex and subject to interpretation. Management believes that it is in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations in all material respects. However, compliance with such laws and regulations can be subject to future government review and interpretation as well as significant regulatory action including fines, penalties, and exclusions from the Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs. Debt Guarantees At December 31, 2018, no agreement to guarantee the debt of other parties exists.

Note

– Contingencies

and Guar

antees

Accrued Risk Reserves

We are self–insured for risks related to health insurance and have wholly–owned limited purpose insurance companies that insure risks related to workers’ compensation and general and professional liability insurance claims both for our owned or leased entities and certain of the entities to which we provide management or accounting services. The liability we have recognized for reported claims and estimates for incurred but unreported claims totals

$96,024,000

and

$93,275,000

December 31, 2018

and

2017,

respectively. The liability is included in accrued risk reserves in the consolidated balance sheets. The amounts are subject to adjustment for actual claims incurred. It is possible that these claims plus unasserted claims could exceed our insurance coverages and our reserves, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

As a result of the terms of our insurance policies and our use of wholly–owned limited purpose insurance companies, we have retained significant insurance risk with respect to workers’ compensation and general and professional liability. We use independent actuaries to assist management in estimating our exposures for claims obligations (for both asserted and unasserted claims) related to deductibles and exposures in excess of coverage limits, and we maintain reserves for these obligations. Such estimates are based on many variables including historical and statistical information and other factors.

Workers

’

Compensation

For workers’ compensation, we utilize a wholly–owned Tennessee domiciled property/casualty insurance company to write coverage for NHC affiliates and for third–party customers. Policies are written for a duration of

twelve

months and cover only risks related to workers’ compensation losses. All customers are companies which operate in the long–term care industry. Business is written on a direct basis. For direct business, coverage is written for statutory limits and the insurance company’s losses in excess of

$1,000,000

per claim are covered by reinsurance.

General and Professional Liability

Insurance and Lawsuits

The senior care industry has experienced significant increases in both the number of personal injury/wrongful death claims and in the severity of awards based upon alleged negligence by skilled nursing facilities and their employees in providing care to residents. As of

December 31, 2018,

we and/or our managed facilities are currently defendants in

claims.

Insurance coverage for all years includes primary policies and excess policies. The primary coverage is in the amount of

$1.0

million per incident,

$3.0

million per location with an annual primary policy aggregate limit that is adjusted on an annual basis. For

2018,

the excess coverage is

$9.0

million per occurrence. Additional insurance is purchased through

third

party providers that serve to supplement the coverage provided through our wholly–owned captive insurance company.

There is certain additional litigation incidental to our business,

none

of which, based upon information available to date, would be material to our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. In addition, the long–term care industry is continuously subject to scrutiny by governmental regulators, which could result in litigation or claims related to regulatory compliance matters.

Caris HealthCare, L.P. Investigation

and Related Litigation

December 9, 2014,

Caris Healthcare, L.P., a business that specializes in hospice care services in Company–owned health care centers and in other settings, received notice from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Tennessee and the Attorney Generals’ Offices for the State of Tennessee and State of Virginia that those government entities were conducting an investigation regarding patient eligibility for hospice services provided by Caris precipitated by a qui tam lawsuit. We have a

75.1%

non–controlling ownership interest in Caris.

A qui tam lawsuit was filed on

May 22, 2014,

in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee by a former Caris employee, Barbara Hinkle, and is captioned United States of America, State of Tennessee, and State of Virginia ex rel. Barbara Hinkle v. Caris Healthcare, L.P.,

No.

3:14–cv–212

(E.D. Tenn.).

June 16, 2016,

the State of Tennessee and the State of Virginia declined to intervene in the qui tam lawsuit. On

June 20, 2016,

the Court ordered that the complaint be unsealed. On

October 11, 2016,

the United States filed a Complaint in Intervention against Caris Healthcare, L.P. and Caris Healthcare, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Caris Healthcare, L.P. The United States' complaint alleged that Caris billed the government for ineligible hospice patients between

June 2013

and

December 2013

and retained overpayments regarding ineligible hospice patients from

April 2010

through

June 2013.

March 9, 2018,

Caris and the United States jointly moved for a partial

-day stay of the case to allow the parties to finalize a settlement in principle of the action. That settlement was finalized on

June 25, 2018,

in which Caris agreed to pay

$8.5

million plus interest for a full release associated with the alleged submission of false claims and alleged retention of overpayments from Medicare for hospice services provided between

April 1, 2010,

and

December 31, 2013.

June 28, 2018,

the District Court entered an Order in connection with the parties’ Joint Stipulation of Dismissal, which dismissed the action with prejudice as to the Hinkle and Hinkle’s bankruptcy trustee, with prejudice to the United States with respect to the conduct released by the settlement, and without prejudice to the United States with respect to all remaining claims. The District Court’s Order concludes this litigation.

Nutritional Support Services, L.P., Qui Tam Litigation

June 19, 2018,

a First Amended Complaint was filed naming Nutritional Support Services, L.P. (“NSS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, as a defendant in the action captioned U.S. ex rel. McClain v. Nutritional Support Services, L.P.,

No.

6:17

-cv-

2608

-AMQ (D.S.C.), which was filed in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. The action alleges that NSS violated the False Claims Act by reporting a National Drug Code (“NDC”) number that did

not

correspond to the NDC for dispensed prescriptions. On

April 16, 2018,

the United States filed a Notice of Election to Decline Intervention with respect to the allegations asserted in this action. NSS intends to vigorously defend itself with respect to this action.

Governmental Regulations

Laws and regulations governing the Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs are complex and subject to interpretation. Management believes that it is in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations in all material respects. However, compliance with such laws and regulations can be subject to future government review and interpretation as well as significant regulatory action including fines, penalties, and exclusions from the Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs.

Debt Guarantees

December 31, 2018,

agreement to guarantee the debt of other parties exists.