XML 38 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
Note 16 - Equity Method Investment in Caris HealthCare, L.P.
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Notes to Financial Statements  
Cost and Equity Method Investments Disclosure [Text Block]
Note
1
6
– Equity
Method Investment in Caris HealthCare, L.P.
 
As of
December
31,
2016,
we have a
75.1%
non–controlling ownership interest in Caris, a business that specializes in hospice care services in NHC owned health care centers and in other settings. The carrying value of our investment is
$34,717,000
and
$35,771,000
at
December
31,
2016
and
2015,
respectively. The carrying amounts are included in investments in limited liability companies in the consolidated balance sheets. The difference between the carrying value of our investment and our capital account balance in Caris is due to the additional limited partner ownership interest the Company acquired from current and former partners. Summarized financial information of Caris for the years ended
December
31,
2016,
2015,
and
2014
is provided below.
 
   
December 31,
 
   
2016
   
2015
   
2014
 
 
 
( in thousands)
 
Current assets
  $
21,973
    $
23,213
    $
20,922
 
Noncurrent assets
   
10,896
     
11,091
     
11,540
 
Liabilities
   
8,082
     
7,970
     
7,305
 
Partners’ capital
   
24,787
     
26,334
     
25,157
 
Revenue
   
52,105
     
50,464
     
51,441
 
Expenses
   
42,928
     
40,875
     
40,908
 
Net income
   
9,177
     
9,589
     
10,533
 
 
 
Consolidation Consideration
s
 
Due to our ownership percentage in Caris, we have considered whether Caris should be consolidated by NHC under the guidance provided in ASC Topic
810,
Consolidation
. We do not consolidate Caris because
(1)
Caris’ equity at risk is sufficient to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support,
(2)
the general partner of the Partnership has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of Caris, and
(3)
the equity holders of Caris possess the characteristics of a controlling financial interest, including voting rights that are proportional to their economic interests. Supporting the assertions above is the following:
(1)
the ownership percentage of the general partner remains equally divided between NHC and another party,
(2)
the general partner manages and controls the Partnership with full and complete discretion, and
(3)
the limited partners have no right or power to take part in the control of the business of the Partnership, which is where our ownership percentage increases have occurred.