10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006

Commission file number: 000-23847

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

VIRGINIA	54-1873994
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

25020 Shore Parkway, Onley, Virginia 23418

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (757) 787-1335

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.275 par value

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  ¨ Accelerated filer  ¨ Non-accelerated filer  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

On June 30, 2006, the aggregate market value of the 1,715,161 shares of Common Stock of the registrant outstanding on such date, excluding shares held by affiliates of the registrant, was approximately $29.2 million. This figure is based on the closing price of $17.01 per share of the registrant’s Common Stock on June 30, 2006.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of March 10, 2007.

Class	Outstanding at March 10, 2007
Common Stock, $0.275 par value	2,497,471

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

(1) Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be used in conjunction with the registrant’s 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated into Part III of this Form 10-K.

This Form 10-K, including information incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K, contains certain forward-looking statements. For this purpose any statements contained in this Form 10-K that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate” or “continue” or comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements by their nature involve substantial risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially depending on a variety of factors.

PART I

Item 1. BUSINESS

General

Shore Financial Corporation (the “Company”) is a Virginia corporation organized in September 1997 by Shore Bank (the “Bank”) for the purpose of becoming a unitary holding company of the Bank. The Company’s assets primarily consist of its investment in the Bank and approximately $6.0 million in cash and other investments. The business and management of the Company consists of the business and management of the Bank. The Bank is a Virginia chartered Federal Reserve member commercial bank that began business in 1961. The Company and the Bank are headquartered in Onley, Virginia.

The Bank operates out of a 19,000 square foot headquarters and operations facility and delivers its banking services through seven full-service banking centers and two investment offices located on the Eastern Shore of Virginia and Maryland, including the counties of Accomack and Northampton in Virginia and Salisbury/Wicomico County area in Maryland. The Bank has a 24.1% market share of the banking deposits in the Accomack and Northampton Counties in Virginia and 3.2% of the market share in Wicomico County Maryland, based on June 30, 2006 deposit information. At December 31, 2006, the Company had consolidated assets of $260.7 million, Bank deposits of $198.1 million and stockholders’ equity of $26.1 million. Ninety-eight dedicated employees staff the Company’s facilities.

The Bank offers a full menu of banking products and services in the communities it serves. For business customers, the Bank offers checking, cash management, credit card merchant services, Internet banking, and a variety of loan options including operating lines of credit, equipment loans, and real estate loans. The Bank is a leading real estate lender in its Virginia markets. For consumers, the Bank offers a totally free checking account, along with telephone and Internet banking services, check cards, free use of the Bank’s twenty-three ATMs and a full compliment of retail banking products. The Bank has a mortgage banking division that offers a wide variety of residential loans, which are originated on a pre-sold basis. The Bank does not securitize these loans.

The Company also offers other services that complement the core financial services offered by the Bank. The Bank’s subsidiary, Shore Investments, Inc. (“Shore Investments”), provides non-deposit investment products including stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and insurance products through the two locations and the Bank’s seven banking centers. An investment officer with over fifteen years of experience in the investment brokerage field manages Shore Investment’s Virginia office, while a Certified Financial Planner is the investment officer in its Maryland office. Shore Investments has also invested in a Virginia title insurance agency that enables the Bank to offer title insurance policies to its real estate loan customers.

Market Area

The Bank’s headquarters, operations center, and five banking centers are located in Accomack and Northampton Counties, which together form the Eastern Shore of Virginia. These two counties run approximately seventy miles from the Maryland state line south and have thousands of miles of coastline on the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries on the west and the Atlantic Ocean on the east. They represent the southern portion of the Delmarva (Delaware-Maryland-Virginia) Peninsula.

2

The Eastern Shore of Virginia is 20 miles by bridge and tunnel from Hampton Roads, Virginia (Norfolk, Virginia Beach, Chesapeake, Portsmouth, Hampton, Suffolk), one of the largest population centers in the country. Tourism and agriculture, along with poultry and seafood processing are the predominant industries on the Eastern Shore.

Northamption County, Virginia has experienced significant development in recent years, especially on the southern end of the county. A planned-unit development named Bay Creek opened in spring 2001 that includes a 3,000-unit gated community and two golf courses designed by golf legends Arnold Palmer and Jack Nicklaus.

Accomack County, Virginia is the home of NASA’s Wallops Island Space Facility and the Regional Space Port Authority, as well as the tourist destinations of Chincoteague Island and the Assateague National Wildlife Refuge that draws over one million visitors annually. Residential development has accelerated in Accomack County with pressure expected to continue in coming years. The space flight facility has recently had a successful rocket launch and plans exist for future launches and growth.

The Bank also has two banking centers in Salisbury, Maryland, the crossroads of the Delmarva Peninsula. Salisbury is the regional hub for industry, commerce, health care, recreation and the arts and is home to Perdue Farms, Peninsula Regional Medical Center, and Salisbury University, as well as a vibrant microwave and wireless communications industry. Along with a strong and diversified industrial base, wholesalers, retailers, and service firms serving ten counties in three states have made Wicomico County a regional supply center for the Eastern Shore of Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia.

Competition

In its market area, the Bank competes with regional commercial banks and independent community banks with multiple offices on the Eastern Shore. These and certain other non-bank competitors may have greater financial resources, diversified markets, and branch networks than the Bank and may be able to offer similar services at varying costs with higher lending limits. With nationwide banking, the Bank also faces the prospect of additional competitors entering its market area.

The Bank faces strong competition both in originating loans and in attracting deposits. Competition in originating loans comes primarily from commercial banks and mortgage lenders and to a lesser extent consumer finance companies, credit unions, and savings institutions. The Bank competes for loans principally on the basis of the quality of service it provides to borrowers, the interest rates and loan fees it charges and the types of loans it originates.

The Bank faces substantial competition in attracting deposits from other banks, money market and mutual funds, credit unions, insurance companies and brokerage houses. The ability of the Bank to attract and retain deposits depends on its ability to provide an investment opportunity that satisfies the requirements of investors as to rate of return, liquidity, risk, convenience and other factors. The Bank competes for these deposits by offering a variety of deposit accounts at competitive rates, having convenient business hours, and by marketing the service it provides as the only locally-owned independent bank on the Eastern Shore of Virginia, and one of four in Salisbury/Wicomico, Maryland.

Credit Policies

The principal risk associated with each of the categories of loans in the Bank’s portfolio is the creditworthiness of its borrowers. Within each category, such risk is increased or decreased, depending on prevailing economic conditions. The Bank employs extensive written policies and procedures to mitigate credit risk. The loan portfolio is managed under a specifically defined credit process. This process includes formulation of portfolio management strategy, guidelines for underwriting standards and risk assessment, procedures for ongoing identification and management of credit deterioration, and regular portfolio reviews to estimate loss exposure and to ascertain compliance with the Bank’s policies.

3

In the normal course of business, the Bank makes various commitments and incurs certain contingent liabilities that are disclosed but not reflected in its annual financial statements, including commitments to extend credit. At December 31, 2006, commitments to extend credit totaled $45.6 million.

One-to-Four Family Residential Real Estate and Land Lending. The Bank’s primary lending program has been the origination of loans secured by one-to-four family residences and land, virtually all of which are located in its market area. At December 31, 2006, one-to-four family real estate and land loans aggregated $111.8 million or 53.1% of the Bank’s gross loans. The Bank evaluates both the borrower’s ability to make principal and interest payments and the value of the property that will secure the loan. Federal law permits the Bank to make loans in amounts of up to 100% of the appraised value of the underlying real estate. Generally, loans are made with a loan to value up to 90% for conventional mortgage loans on primary residences. The Bank generally originates mortgage loans that have an adjustable rate feature in which the rate changes every one, three or five years. Most adjustable rate loans are tied to comparable maturity U.S. Treasury Bills. Where loans are not indexed, they generally have a balloon feature. However, the Bank does offer some fixed rate home equity and purchase money mortgages on a more restrictive basis and offers conforming fixed rate mortgages through its mortgage banking division. There are unquantifiable risks resulting from potential increased costs to the borrower as a result of repricing. Accordingly, it is possible that, during periods of rising interest rates, the risk of defaults on adjustable rate mortgages (“ARMs”) may increase due to the upward adjustment of interest costs to borrowers.

Construction Lending. The Bank makes local construction loans, primarily residential and small commercial loans. The construction loans are secured by the property for which the loan was obtained. At December 31, 2006, construction loans outstanding were $6.3 million or 3.0% of gross loans. The average life of a construction loan is less than twelve months and they either reprice daily based on the prime rate or are fixed during the construction period.

Commercial Real Estate Lending. The Bank also originates commercial real estate loans. Various types of commercial real estate secure these loans, including multifamily residential buildings, commercial buildings and offices, and raw land used for development. At December 31, 2006, commercial real estate loans aggregated $64.7 million or 30.7% of the Bank’s gross loans. The interest rates on commercial real estate loans are usually fixed for 1 to 5 years, generally amortize over 5 to 20 years and may have a call provision. The Bank’s commercial real estate loans are secured by properties in its market area.

In its underwriting of commercial real estate, the Bank may lend, under federal regulation, up to 100% of the security property’s appraised value, although the Bank’s loan to appraised value ratio on such properties is 80% or less in most cases. Commercial real estate lending entails significant additional risk, compared with residential mortgage lending. Commercial real estate loans may involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. Additionally, the payment experience on loans secured by income producing properties is typically dependent on the successful operation of a business or a real estate project and thus may be subject to adverse conditions in the real estate market or in the economy generally. The Bank’s commercial real estate loan underwriting criteria require an examination of debt service coverage ratios, the borrower’s creditworthiness and prior credit history and reputation, and the personal guarantees or endorsements of borrowers.

Commercial Loans. At December 31, 2006, commercial loans aggregated $9.7 million or 4.6% of the Bank’s gross loans. Commercial business loans generally have a higher degree of risk than residential mortgage loans, but have commensurably higher yields. To manage these risks, the Bank generally secures appropriate collateral and carefully monitors the financial condition of its large commercial exposures. Commercial business loans typically are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from the cash flow generated by its business and are often secured by business assets, such as accounts receivable, equipment and inventory. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial business loans may be substantially dependent on the success of the business itself. Further, the collateral for commercial business loans may

4

depreciate over time and cannot be appraised with as much precision as residential real estate. The Bank has a credit review and monitoring system to regularly review the cash flow and collateral of commercial borrowers.

Consumer Lending. The Bank offers various secured and unsecured consumer loans, including unsecured personal loans and lines of credit, home equity lines of credit, automobile loans, deposit account loans and installment and demand loans. At December 31, 2006, the Bank had consumer loans of $18.1 million or 8.6% of gross loans. Such loans are generally made to customers with whom the Bank has a preexisting relationship and are generally in amounts of under $200,000. The Bank originates virtually all of its consumer loans in its market area

Consumer loans may entail greater risk than do residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans that are unsecured, such as lines of credit, or secured by rapidly depreciable assets such as automobiles. In such cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance as a result of the greater likelihood of damage, loss or depreciation. The remaining deficiency often does not warrant further substantial collection efforts against the borrower. In addition, consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and thus are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount which can be recovered on such loans.

Employees

At December 31, 2006, the Company had 87 full-time and 11 part-time employees. The Company considers relations with its employees to be good.

Regulation and Supervision

Set forth below is a brief description of certain laws and regulations that relate to the regulation of the Company and the Bank. The descriptions of these laws and regulations, as well as descriptions of laws and regulations contained elsewhere herein, do not purport to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by reference to applicable laws and regulations.

The Company

General. The Company, as a bank holding company, is subject to regulation under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (the “BHCA”) and the regulation, supervision and examination requirements of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”). Bank holding companies are subject to extensive regulation by the Federal Reserve as set forth in Regulation Y, 12 C.F.R. Part 225. Regulation Y establishes the registration, reporting, examination, applications, acquisitions, control and divestiture, change in bank control, appraisals, and change in director and senior executive officers requirements applicable to bank holding companies. Regulation Y and the interpretations and rulings issued by the Federal Reserve thereunder identify various prohibited non-banking activities in which bank holding companies and their subsidiaries may not engage as well as various exempt activities in which a bank holding company and its subsidiaries may engage either with or, in some cases, without prior Federal Reserve approval. Regulation Y further confirms the authority of the Federal Reserve under the BHCA to impose criminal and civil penalties for violations of the BHCA and the regulations and orders issued thereunder and to issue cease and desist orders when necessary in connection therewith.

Activities Obligations and Restrictions. There are a number of obligations and restrictions imposed on bank holding companies and their depository institution subsidiaries that are designed to reduce potential loss exposure to the depositors of the depository institutions and to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance funds. For example, under a policy of the Federal Reserve with respect to bank holding company

5

operations, a bank holding company is required to serve as a source of financial strength to its subsidiary depository institutions and to commit resources to support such institutions in circumstances where it might not do so absent such policy.

Banking laws also provide that amounts received from the liquidation or other resolution of any insured depository institution by any receiver must be distributed (after payment of secured claims) to pay the deposit liabilities of the institution prior to payment of any other general or unsecured senior liability, subordinated liability, general creditor or stockholder. This provision would give depositors a preference over general and subordinated creditors and stockholders in the event a receiver is appointed to distribute the asset of any bank or savings bank subsidiaries.

Exchange Act. The Company is subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), including the filing of annual, quarterly and other reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). As an Exchange Act reporting company, the Company is directly affected by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules and regulations enacted pursuant thereto (the “SOX Act”), the corporate responsibility and accounting reform legislation signed into law on July 30, 2002.

The Bank

General. As a state chartered commercial bank, the Bank is subject to regulation, supervision and examination requirements of the Bureau of Financial Institutions of the Virginia State Corporation Commission (“SCC”). The Bank is also subject to the regulation, supervision and examination requirements of the Federal Reserve and the FDIC. State and federal laws also govern the activities in which the Bank may engage, the investments it may make and the aggregate amount of loans that may be granted to one borrower. Various consumer and compliance laws and regulations also affect the Bank’s operations. The Federal Reserve and the SCC conduct periodic examinations to test the Bank’s compliance with various regulatory requirements. The SCC completed its most recent examination in March 2007, while the Federal Reserve completed a compliance examination of the Bank during November 2002 and a safety and soundness examination during April 2005. Federal and state laws preclude the Bank from disclosing the results of these examinations.

Insurance of Accounts. The FDIC insures the deposits of the Bank up to the limits set forth under applicable law. On February 15, 2006, federal legislation to reform federal deposit insurance was enacted. The new law merged the old Bank Insurance Fund and Savings Association Insurance Fund into the single Deposit Insurance Fund (the “DIF”), increased deposit insurance coverage for IRAs to $250,000, provides for the further increase of deposit insurance on all accounts by indexing the coverage to the rate of inflation, authorizes the FDIC to set the reserve ratio of the DIF at a level between 1.15% and 1.50%, and permits the FDIC to establish assessments to be paid by insured banks to maintain the minimum ratios.

On November 2, 2006, the FDIC adopted final regulations establishing a risk-based assessment system that is intended to more closely tie each bank’s deposit insurance assessments to the risk it poses to the DIF. Under the new risk-based assessment system, which became effective in the beginning of 2007, the FDIC will evaluate each bank’s risk based on three primary factors: (1) its supervisory rating, (2) its financial ratios, and (3) its long-term debt issuer rating, if the bank has one. The new rates for most banks will vary between five and seven cents for every $100 of domestic deposits.

Applied to the Bank’s assessment base of approximately $202.2 million, this translates to an annual deposit premium estimated to be between $101,100 and $141,500. Most banks, including Shore Bank, have not been required to pay any deposit insurance premiums since 1995. As part of the reform, Congress provided credits to institutions that paid high premiums in the past to bolster the FDIC’s insurance reserves. As a result, according to the FDIC, the majority of banks will have assessment credits to initially offset all of their premiums in 2007. The preliminary assessment credit for the Bank was calculated at $126,900. The assessment credit will not be recognized up front, but recognized on a go-forward basis only to the extent the credit is used to reduce future

6

deposit premiums that would otherwise be due. Accordingly, the Company expects the reinstitution of deposit premiums by the FDIC will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows in 2007. The level of annual deposit premiums is dependent on the amount of the Bank’s deposit assessment base.

Check 21. On October 28, 2003, President Bush signed into law the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act, also known as Check 21. Check 21 gives “substitute checks,” such as a digital image of a check and copies made from that image, the same legal standing as the original paper check. Some of the major provisions of Check 21 include:

• allowing check truncation without making it mandatory;

• demanding that every financial institution communicate to accountholders in writing a description of its substitute check processing program and their rights under the law;

• legalizing substitutions for and replacements of paper checks without agreement from consumers;

• retaining in place the previously mandated electronic collection and return of checks between financial institutions only when individual agreements are in place;

• requiring that when accountholders request verification, financial institutions produce the original check (or a copy that accurately represents the original) and demonstrate that the account debit was accurate and valid; and

• requiring recrediting of funds to an individual’s account on the next business day after a consumer proves that the financial institution has erred.

This legislation will likely affect bank capital spending as many financial institutions assess whether technological or operational changes are necessary to stay competitive and take advantage of the new opportunities presented by Check 21.

Regulatory Capital Requirements. The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Generally, the Company and the Bank are required to maintain a minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets of 8%. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier I capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2006, that the Company meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject. In fact, at December 31, 2006, the Bank exceeded all of its regulatory capital requirements, with total capital to risk-weighted assets, tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and tier 1 capital to average assets ratios of 12.97%, 11.71% and 8.27%, respectively.

Capital Distributions. The Bank is subject to legal limitations on capital distributions including the payment of dividends, if, after making such distribution, the institution would become “undercapitalized” (as such term is used in the statute). For all state member banks of the Federal Reserve seeking to pay dividends, the prior approval of the applicable Federal Reserve Bank is required if the total of all dividends declared in any calendar year will exceed the sum of the bank’s net profits for that year and its retained net profits for the preceding two calendar years. Federal law also generally prohibits a depository institution from making any capital distribution

7

(including payment of a dividend or payment of a management fee to its holding company) if the depository institution would thereafter fail to maintain capital above regulatory minimums. Federal Reserve member banks are also authorized to limit the payment of dividends by any state member bank if such payment may be deemed to constitute an unsafe or unsound practice. In addition, under Virginia law, no dividend may be declared or paid that would impair a Virginia chartered bank’s paid-in capital. The SCC has general authority to prohibit payment of dividends by a Virginia chartered bank if it determines that the limitation is in the public interest and is necessary to ensure the bank’s financial soundness.

Financial Modernization Legislation. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (“GLBA”) was signed into law on November 12, 1999. The main purpose of GLBA is to permit greater affiliations within the financial services industry, primarily banking, securities and insurance. The provisions of GLBA that are believed to be of most significance to the Company are discussed below.

GLBA repeals sections 20 and 32 of the Glass-Steagall Act, which separated commercial banking from investment banking, and substantially amends the BHCA, which limited the ability of bank holding companies to engage in the securities and insurance businesses. To achieve this purpose, GLBA provides for a new type of company, the “financial holding company.” A financial holding company may engage in or acquire companies that engage in a broad range of financial services, including

• Securities activities such as underwriting, dealing, brokerage, investment and merchant banking; and

• Insurance underwriting, sales and brokerage activities.

A bank holding company may elect to become a financial holding company only if all of its depository institution subsidiaries are well-capitalized, well-managed and have at least a satisfactory Community Reinvestment Act rating. While the Company meets the requirements to become a financial holding company, it has not elected to be treated as a financial holding company under GLBA at this time.

GLBA, and certain regulations issued by federal banking agencies, also provide protections against the transfer and use by financial institutions of consumers’ nonpublic personal information. A financial institution must provide to its customers, at the beginning of the customer relationship and annually thereafter, the institution’s policies and procedures regarding the handling of customers’ nonpublic personal financial information. The privacy provisions generally prohibit a financial institution from providing a customer’s personal financial information to unaffiliated third parties unless the institution discloses to the customer that the information may be so provided and the customer is given the opportunity to opt out of such disclosure.

Many of GLBA’s provisions, including the customer privacy protection provisions, required the Federal bank regulatory agencies and other regulatory bodies to adopt regulations to implement those respective provisions. Neither the provisions of GLBA nor the act’s implementing regulations, as proposed or adopted, have a material impact on the Company’s or the Bank’s regulatory capital ratios (as discussed above) or ability to continue to operate in a safe and sound manner.

USA Patriot Act of 2001. In October 2001, the USA Patriot Act of 2001 (the “Patriot Act”) was enacted in response to the terrorist attacks in New York, Pennsylvania and Washington, D.C. which occurred on September 11, 2001. The Patriot Act is intended to strengthen U.S. law enforcements and the intelligence communities’ abilities to work cohesively to combat terrorism on a variety of fronts. The potential impact of the Patriot Act on financial institutions of all kinds is significant and wide ranging. The Patriot Act contains sweeping anti-money laundering and financial transparency laws and imposes various regulations, including standards for verifying client identification at account opening, and rules to promote cooperation among financial institutions, regulators and law enforcement entities in identifying parties that may be involved in terrorism or money laundering.

Reporting Terrorist Activities. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) has sent, and will send, banking regulatory agencies lists of the names of persons suspected of involvement in terrorist attacks. The Bank has been

8

requested, and will be requested, to search its records for any relationships or transactions with persons on those lists. If the Bank finds any relationships or transactions, it must file a suspicious activity report and contact the FBI.

The Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”), which is a division of the Department of Treasury, is responsible for helping to ensure that United States entities do not engage in transactions with “enemies” of the United States, as defined by various Executive Orders and Acts of Congress. OFAC has sent, and will send, banking regulatory agencies lists of names of persons and organizations suspected of aiding, harboring or engaging in terrorist acts. If the Bank finds a name on any transaction, account or wire transfer that is on an OFAC list, it must freeze such account, file a suspicious activity report and notify the FBI. The Bank has appointed a security officer to oversee the inspection of its accounts and the filing of any notifications. The Bank actively checks high-risk OFAC areas such as new accounts, wire transfers and customer files. The Bank performs these checks utilizing software, which is updated each time a modification is made to the lists provided by OFAC and other agencies of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons.

Other Regulations. Interest and other charges collected or contracted for by the Bank are subject to state usury laws and federal laws concerning interest rates. The Bank’s loan operations will also be subject to federal laws applicable to credit transactions, such as:

• the federal Truth-In-Lending Act, governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers;

• the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975, requiring financial institutions to provide information to enable the public and public officials to determine whether a financial institution is fulfilling its obligation to help meet the housing needs of the community it serves;

• the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, creed or other prohibited factors in extending credit;

• the Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1978, governing the use and provision of information to credit reporting agencies;

• the Fair Debt Collection Act, governing the manner in which consumer debts may be collected by collection agencies; and

• the rules and regulations of the various federal agencies charged with the responsibility of implementing such federal laws.

In addition, the deposit operations of the Bank will be subject to:

• the Right to Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain confidentiality of consumer financial records and prescribes procedures for complying with administrative subpoenas of financial records; and

• the Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E issued by the Federal Reserve Board to implement that Act, which govern automatic deposits to and withdrawals from deposit accounts and clients’ rights and liabilities arising from the use of automated teller machines and other electronic banking services.

9

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

General economic conditions, either national or in the markets where the Company operates, may become unfavorable.

The Company is affected by general economic conditions in the United States and, in particular, the markets in which it operates. An economic downturn within the Company’s markets or the nation as a whole could negatively impact household and corporate incomes. This impact may lead to decreased demand for both loan and deposit products and increase the number of customers who fail to pay interest or principal on their loans.

Due to the limited number of markets in which the Company operates, it is less able than a larger institution to spread the risks of unfavorable local economic conditions across a large number of diversified economies. Moreover, we cannot give any assurance that we will benefit from any market growth or favorable economic conditions in our primary market areas if they do occur.

If the Company does not adjust to rapid changes in the financial services industry, its financial performance may suffer.

The Company’s ability to deliver strong financial performance and returns on investment to shareholders will depend in part on its ability to expand the scope of available financial services offerings to meet the needs and demands of its customers. In addition to the challenge of competing against other banks in attracting and retaining customers for traditional banking services, the Company’s competitors also include securities dealers, brokers, mortgage bankers, investment advisors, specialty finance and insurance companies who seek to offer one-stop financial services that may include services that banks have not been able or allowed to offer to their customers in the past. The increasingly competitive environment is primarily a result of changes in regulation, changes in technology and product delivery systems and the accelerating pace of consolidation among financial service providers.

Legislative or regulatory changes or actions, or significant litigation, could adversely impact the Company or the businesses in which the Company is engaged.

The Company is subject to extensive state and federal regulation, supervision and legislation that govern almost all aspects of its operations. Laws and regulations may change from time to time and are primarily intended for the protection of consumers, depositors and the deposit insurance funds. The impact of any changes to laws and regulations or other actions by regulatory agencies may negatively impact the Company or its ability to increase the value of its business. Additionally, actions by regulatory agencies or significant litigation against the Company could cause it to devote significant time and resources to defending itself and may lead to penalties that materially affect the Company and its shareholders. Future changes in the laws or regulations or their interpretations or enforcement could be materially adverse to the Company and its shareholders.

The Company is exposed to operational risk.

Similar to any corporation, the Company is exposed to many types of operational risk, including reputational risk, legal and compliance risk, the risk of fraud or theft by employees or outsiders, unauthorized transactions by employees or operational errors, including clerical or record-keeping errors or those resulting from faulty or disabled computer or telecommunications systems.

Negative public opinion can result from the Company’s actual or alleged conduct in any number of activities, including lending practices, corporate governance and acquisitions and from actions taken by government regulators and community organizations in response to those activities. Negative public opinion can adversely affect the Company’s ability to attract and keep customers and can expose it to litigation and regulatory action.

10

Given the volume of transactions at the Company, certain errors may be repeated or compounded before they are discovered and successfully rectified. The Company’s necessary dependence upon automated systems to record and process its transaction volume may further increase the risk that technical system flaws or employee tampering or manipulation of those systems will result in losses that are difficult to detect. The Company may also be subject to disruptions of its operating systems arising from events that are wholly or partially beyond its control (for example, computer viruses or electrical or telecommunications outages), which may give rise to disruption of service to customers and to financial loss or liability. The Company is further exposed to the risk that its external vendors may be unable to fulfill their contractual obligations (or will be subject to the same risk of fraud or operational errors by their respective employees as is the Company) and to the risk that the Company’s (or its vendors’) business continuity and data security systems prove to be inadequate.

Changes in interest rates could affect the Company’s income and cash flows.

The Company’s income and cash flows depend to a great extent on the difference between the interest rates earned on interest-earning assets such as loans and investment securities, and the interest rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities such as deposits and borrowings. These rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond the Company’s control, including general economic conditions and the policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies (in particular, the Federal Reserve). Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, will influence the origination of loans, the prepayment speed of loans, the purchase of investments, the generation of deposits and the rates received on loans and investment securities and paid on deposits or other sources of funding. The impact of these changes may be magnified if the Company does not effectively manage the relative sensitivity of its assets and liabilities to changes in market interest rates. Fluctuations in these areas may adversely affect the Company and its shareholders.

Changes in accounting standards could impact reported earnings.

The accounting standard setters, including the Financial Accounting Standards Board, SEC and other regulatory bodies, periodically change the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. These changes can be hard to predict and can materially impact how it records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, the Company could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in the restatement of prior period financial statements.

The preparation of the Company’s financial statements requires the use of estimates that may vary from actual results.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make significant estimates that affect the financial statements. Two of the Company’s most critical estimates are the level of the allowance for credit losses and the valuation of certain assets, including available-for-sale investment securities and real estate owned. Due to the inherent nature of these estimates, the Company cannot provide absolute assurance that it will not significantly increase the allowance for credit losses and/or sustain credit losses that are significantly higher than the provided allowance, nor that it will not recognize a significant loss or impairment of its investment securities and real estate owned assets. For more information on the sensitivity of these estimates, refer to the Critical Accounting Policies and Judgments section.

The Company’s stock price may fluctuate.

The Company’s stock price is publicly traded and, therefore, several factors exist that could cause the price to fluctuate substantially in the future. These factors include:

• actual or anticipated variations in earnings;

• changes in analysts’ recommendations or projections regarding bank stocks;

11

• the Company’s announcements of developments related to its businesses;

• operating and stock performance of other companies deemed to be peers;

• new technology used or services offered by traditional and non-traditional competitors;

• news reports of trends, concerns and other issues related to the financial services industry; and

• the low transaction volume of the Company’s stock.

The Company’s stock price may fluctuate significantly in the future, and these fluctuations may be unrelated to the Company’s performance. General market price declines or market volatility in the future could adversely affect the price of its common stock, and the current market price may not be indicative of future market prices.

Even though the Company’s common stock is currently traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market’s Global Market, it has less liquidity than the average stock quoted on a national securities exchange.

The trading volume in the Company’s common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market has been relatively low when compared with larger companies listed on the NASDAQ Global Market or the stock exchanges. Because of this, it may be more difficult for shareholders to sell a substantial number of shares for the same price at which shareholders could sell a smaller number of shares. Additionally, volatility of the stock price may occur on relatively small trading volumes of the Company’s stock.

The Company cannot predict the effect, if any, that future sales of its common stock in the market, or the availability of shares of common stock for sale in the market, will have on the market price of the common stock. The Company can give no assurance that sales of substantial amounts of common stock in the market, or the potential for large amounts of sales in the market, would not cause the price of its common stock to decline or impair The Company’s future ability to raise capital through sales of its common stock.

Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

There are no unresolved staff comments currently outstanding.

Item 2. PROPERTIES

The Company’s headquarters is located at 25020 Shore Parkway, Onley, Virginia, a two story colonial brick building built in 2004 that houses the Company’s corporate offices and operations center. The Bank operates seven branch banking offices (5 in Virginia and 2 in Salisbury, Maryland), owning six of them free of any encumbrances and the other the Bank owns the building free of any encumbrances, but leases the land under an agreement expiring in 2009, with two remaining five-year renewals. Currently, the Bank is leasing a temporary location under a two year lease to house one of its branches while the other location is renovated. Shore Investments leases office space under an agreement expiring in 2010, with two optional five-year renewal periods.

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In the ordinary course of its operations, the Company is a party to various legal proceedings. Based upon information currently available, management believes that such legal proceedings, in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, or results of operations of the Company.

Item 4. SUBMISSIONS OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2006.

12

PART II

Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

The Company’s common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “SHBK.” The following table sets forth the per share high and low closing prices along with dividends that were paid quarterly on the common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market for the periods indicated:

	High		Low		Cash Dividends Paid
2005
First Quarter	$	17.33	$	13.79	$	0.050
Second Quarter		15.25		13.39		0.050
Third Quarter		15.83		14.47		0.058
Fourth Quarter		15.58		13.52		0.058
2006
First Quarter	$	15.13	$	13.96	$	0.058
Second Quarter		14.67		13.75		0.058
Third Quarter		17.56		13.75		0.058
Fourth Quarter		15.90		14.50		0.070

At February 16, 2007, there were 2,497,471 shares of common stock outstanding held by 993 stockholders of record.

13

Performance Graph

The following graph compares the yearly cumulative total shareholder return on the Company’s common stock with (1) the yearly cumulative total shareholder return on stocks included in the Nasdaq composite stock index and (2) the yearly cumulative total shareholder return on stocks included in the SNL stock index for banks of with less than $500 million in total assets.

There can be no assurance that the Company’s stock performance in the future will continue with the same or similar trends depicted in the graph below.

	Period Ending
Index	12/31/01	12/31/02	12/31/03	12/31/04	12/31/05	12/31/06
Shore Financial Corporation	100.00	129.81	221.83	269.03	234.32	247.42
NASDAQ Composite	100.00	68.76	103.67	113.16	115.57	127.58
SNL <$500M Bank Index	100.00	128.07	186.94	215.79	228.47	240.01

Dividend Policy

On January 9, 2007, the Company declared a $0.07 per share quarterly cash dividend paid on February 1, 2007 to shareholders of record on January 24, 2007. The Company hopes to continue with a quarterly cash dividend on its common stock in the future. Any future determination as to payment of cash dividends will be at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors and will depend on the Company’s earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors. During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Bank paid $1,000,000 and $500,000, respectively, in dividends to the Company. During February 2007, the Bank paid $700,000 in dividends to the Company.

14

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table summarizes information, as of December 31, 2006, relating to the equity compensation plans of the Company pursuant to which grants of options to acquire shares of common stock may be granted from time to time.

	Number of Shares to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights		Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights		Number of Shares Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plan
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders (1)	137,489	(2)	$	11.25	239,500
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders	—			—	—
Total	137,489		$	11.25	239,500

(1) These plans are the Company’s 1992 Stock Option Plan and 2001 Stock Incentive Plan.

(2) Consists of options granted pursuant to the Company’s stock incentive plans.

15

Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

	Years Ended December 31,
	2006			2005			2004			2003			2002
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Income Statement Data:
Interest income	$	15,113		$	12,851		$	10,697		$	9,501		$	9,406
Interest expense		6,618			4,414			3,275			3,275			3,716
Net interest income		8,495			8,437			7,422			6,226			5,690
Provision for loan losses		59			304			419			380			335
Noninterest income		3,392			2,379			1,920			1,889			1,375
Noninterest expense		7,739			6,644			5,559			4,780			4,156
Income taxes		1,156			1,193			1,011			893			802
Net income	$	2,933		$	2,675		$	2,353		$	2,062		$	1,772
Per Share Data:
Net income—basic (1)	$	1.18		$	1.08		$	0.95		$	0.84		$	0.73
Net income—dilutive (1)		1.16			1.06			0.93			0.83			0.72
Cash dividends (1)		0.25			0.22			0.18			0.14			0.10
Book value at period end		10.46			11.39			10.64			9.80			10.73
Tangible book value at period end		10.30			11.17			10.39			9.51			10.35
Average shares outstanding (000’s) (1)		2,492			2,485			2,474			2,444			2,441
Balance Sheet Data (period end):
Assets	$	260,676		$	247,419		$	237,689		$	196,550		$	179,993
Loans, net of unearned income and allowance		207,725			192,697			175,995			140,207			116,810
Securities		30,408			32,351			38,972			40,611			47,183
Deposits		198,103			188,970			192,737			158,891			158,989
Stockholders’ equity		26,126			23,629			21,959			20,201			18,218
Performance Ratios:
Return on average assets		1.14	%		1.10	%		1.08	%		1.11	%		1.12	%
Return on average equity		11.76	%		11.74	%		11.01	%		10.64	%		10.31	%
Net interest margin		3.57	%		3.75	%		3.72	%		3.63	%		3.82	%
Efficiency (2)		63.99	%		63.54	%		59.47	%		59.70	%		59.01	%
Asset Quality Ratios:
Allowance for loan losses to period end loans		1.36	%		1.49	%		1.35	%		1.41	%		1.35	%
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans		308.59	%		267.95	%		253.05	%		362.68	%		182.37	%
Nonperforming assets to period end loans and foreclosed properties		0.44	%		0.56	%		0.53	%		0.39	%		0.74	%
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans		0.02	%		(0.08	)%		0.01	%		(0.01	)%		0.05	%
Capital and Liquidity Ratios:
Leverage (3)		10.02	%		9.55	%		9.24	%		10.28	%		10.12	%
Risk-based:
Tier 1 capital		13.77	%		13.21	%		12.74	%		14.37	%		15.02	%
Total capital		15.09	%		14.53	%		14.14	%		15.74	%		16.24	%
Average loans to average deposits		104.48	%		96.93	%		87.60	%		79.78	%		80.56	%

(1) Earnings per share, dividends per share and average share data adjusted to reflect 20% stock dividend paid by the Company during December 2003 and the six-for-five stock split effected during August 2006.

(2) Computed by dividing noninterest expense, net of nonrecurring expenses, by the sum of net interest income and noninterest income, net of security gains and losses.

(3) Computed as a percentage of stockholders’ equity to period end assets.

16

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

The Company’s strong financial performance continued during 2006 producing record earnings of $2.93 million for the year. These results represented a 9.6% increase over the $2.68 million earned in 2005 and earned our shareholders a return of $1.16 per diluted share compared to $1.06 in 2005. Many changes occurred during 2006 that affected the Company’s financial performance during the year. The Federal Reserve continued its aggressive monetary policy of interest rate tightening during the first half of 2006 before deciding to pause during the summer. Even during this period of rate tightening the Company’s real estate loan production continued to thrive within its markets. However, the affect of the Federal Reserve’s actions began to negatively impact the Company’s net interest margin early in 2006. Long-term interest rates in the financial markets began to fall which caused the yield curve to flatten and eventually invert. This occurrence along with an increasingly competitive deposit gathering market and a slowing of the loan production during the second half of 2006 resulted in a net interest margin of 3.57% during the year, compared to 3.75% in 2005.

Despite the impact that the declining net interest margin had on net interest income, the Company’s earnings benefited from several steps taken during 2005 and early 2006 to boost noninterest income. The addition of a courtesy overdraft product helped increase deposit account fees to $2.29 million during 2006, representing a 70.2% increase over the $1.34 million generated in 2005. Additionally, increased production from the Company’s investment brokers during 2006, one of which was hired during 2005 with fifteen years experience, resulted in an increase in investment brokerage commissions of 95.9% to $337,200, compared to $172,100 during 2005. The Company also took advantage of investment portfolio profits by realizing $210,000 of net gains on sales of securities during 2006, compared to $315,900 of gains on the sales of investments and real estate in 2005.

The Company’s efficiency ratio remained relatively flat during 2006 at 63.99% compared to 63.54% for 2005, with the shrinking net interest margin and an increase in noninterest expenses to $7.74 million from $6.64 million during 2005 impacting the ratio. The majority of the expense increase occurred in compensation and benefits expense, primarily resulting from increases in commissions associated with operating the Company’s investment brokerage services, the expensing of stock options granted to non-executive employees and general increases in compensation and other benefits. The Company also took on other customer service initiatives, including expansion of the Bank’s ATM network by seventeen machines, additional internet banking services and other new deposit products.

The Company’s total assets grew to $260.7 million at December 31, 2006, compared to $247.4 million at December 31, 2005, primarily resulting from a 7.7% increase in loans. Total gross loans ended the 2006 at $210.6 million, compared to $195.5 million at December 31, 2005, while total deposits ended the year at $198.1 million, compared to $189.0 million at December 31, 2005. Continued growth in the Bank’s real estate loan portfolio, specifically those secured by one-to-four family residences and land, represented the largest portion of the increase. The growth in deposits primarily occurred in the time deposit category. Aggressive competition for retail deposits in the Bank’s markets continued during 2006 making significant growth challenging. As a result of the Company’s strong 2006 earnings, total shareholders’ equity grew to $26.1 million at December 31, 2006, compared to $23.6 million in equity at December 31, 2005.

The Bank’s loan portfolio quality remained strong during 2006. The Bank experienced net loan charge-offs of $37,000 during 2006 which is 0.02% of total loans, while the level of nonperforming assets to period end loans was 0.44% at December 31, 2006. The Bank had no other real estate owned (“OREO”) or other foreclosed assets at December 31, 2006 and maintained an allowance for loan losses to period end loans of 1.36%.

17

Results of Operation

General

Net interest income is the major component of the Company’s earnings and is equal to the amount by which interest income exceeds interest expense. Interest income is derived from interest-earning assets composed primarily of loans and securities. Interest expense results from interest-bearing liabilities, primarily consisting of deposits and short-term borrowings. Changes in the volume and mix of these assets and liabilities, as well as changes in the yields earned and rates paid, determine changes in net interest income. Net interest margin is calculated by dividing net interest income by average earning assets and represents the Company’s net yield on its earning assets.

Interest Income

2006 Compared to 2005

During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company earned $15.1 million in interest income, representing a 17.6% increase over the $12.9 million earned for the year ended December 31, 2005. The Company’s net interest income benefited from growth in the its loan portfolio and improved yields on earning assets, but was negatively impacted by increasing cost of funding.

Spearheaded by 10.7% growth in average loans outstanding resulting from $82.0 million on total loan production, average earning assets were $240.2 million during 2006, representing a $13.1 million increase over 2005. Average total loans increased $19.9 million to $206.3 million during 2006 from $186.4 million during 2005. The Bank’s real estate mortgage loan portfolio experienced the most growth with an increase of 17.0% in average balances outstanding, while average commercial loans increased 4.2% and average consumer loans (including home equity lines) were flat. Real estate mortgage loan balances, which include construction loans, averaged $114.5 during 2006, while commercial and consumer loans averaged $73.5 million and $18.2 million, respectively. The Bank realized strong loan production during the first half of 2006 while production levels slowed to a more moderate pace during the second half of the year. Average securities declined by $6.6 million to $31.5 million during 2006 compared to $38.1 million during 2005. The Company used maturing securities to fund liquidity needs during 2006 due to limited opportunities in the investment market and the rising cost of funds, mostly due to a flat yield curve.

Yields on earning assets continued to benefit from the Company’s asset sensitive financial position. Total yields improved to 6.33% during 2006 compared to 5.69% in 2005. Loans yielded 6.57% during the year, compared to 6.03% during 2005, resulting primarily from the repricing of adjustable rate loans and loan growth. The maturity of lower yielding investment securities helped improve the yield on securities to 4.87% during 2006, compared to 4.21% for the year ended December 31, 2005.

2005 Compared to 2004

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company earned $12.9 million in interest income, compared to the $10.7 million earned for the year ended December 31, 2004. Growth in the Company’s loan portfolio and its asset-sensitive position during a period of rising interest rates resulted in the 20.1% increase in interest income. Additionally, the Company continued to improve its assets mix by shifting assets from the investment portfolio to the higher-yielding loan portfolio.

Securities yielded 4.21% during the year ended December 31, 2005, compared to 4.07% for the year ended December 31, 2004. Average securities declined by $1.1 million to $38.1 million during 2005 compared to $39.2 million during 2004. This decrease resulted from loan demand continuing to absorb available liquidity, benign deposit growth and a weak investment market, partially due to a flattening yield curve.

Loans yielded 6.03% during the year ended December 31, 2005, compared to 5.71% during 2004. Average total loans increased $26.2 million, or 16.4%, to $186.4 million during 2005 from $160.2 million during 2004.

18

The bank’s average commercial loan portfolio experienced another year of significant growth with an increase of 20.2% since December 2004, while average mortgage loans (including construction loans) experienced solid growth with an increase of 17.1%. Average consumer loans (including home equity lines) were $18.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, relatively flat when compared to the $17.9 million average outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2004. Although short-term interest rates continued to rise during 2005, longer-term rates did not change significantly which allowed the real estate market to continue its expansion.

Interest Expense

2006 Compared to 2005

As the yield curve became more inverted during 2006, the Company faced the challenge of obtaining cost-effective funding to support its loan growth and other liquidity needs. During the recent period of rising rates, customers became more interest rate sensitive and began moving funds out of lower yielding accounts into higher yielding accounts. Also, the uncertainty surrounding the direction of interest rates caused customers to demand shorter term time deposits as opposed those with longer terms. As the retail deposit market became more competitive, the Company looked to the wholesale funding markets for alternative liquidity needs. Although at different points in 2006 the wholesale markets provided less expensive funding than the retail market, the funds were still costly and, accordingly, negatively impacted the Company’s interest expense.

The Company’s interest expense increased $2.2 million to $6.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to $4.4 million during 2005. Average interest-bearing liabilities increased 5.6% to $204.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2006, as compared to $193.4 million during 2005, while the cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased 96 basis points from 2.28% during 2005 to 3.24% during 2006. Total average deposits, including noninterest-bearing demand deposits, increased 2.7% to $197.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2006 from $192.3 million during 2005. The Company’s cost of funds (including demand deposits) was 2.86% during 2006, compared to 2.00% for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Average checking and savings account balances were $67.1 million during 2006 and the cost of these funds for the year was 96 basis points, representing a 18 basis point increase over the prior year. Average time deposit balances were $103.4 million and the cost of these funds increased by 93 basis points to 4.18% for the year. As part of the it’s increased reliance on wholesale funding during 2006, the Bank purchased $7.0 million of brokered deposits and average Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) borrowings increased by $5.1 million to $33.7 million during the year. Of the total FHLB borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2006, $12.5 million represent amounts with fixed terms up to seven years while the remaining balance floats based on an overnight rate. The cost of these funds increased 133 basis points to 4.92% during 2006.

2005 Compared to 2004

During 2005, an increase in the deposit market competition and a more opportunistic stock market inhibited the Bank’s ability to grow deposits. As a result, the Bank increased its reliance on wholesale funding to provide the liquidity needed to fund loan growth. Consequently, the Company’s interest expense increased $1.1 million to $4.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2005, as compared to $3.3 million during 2004. Average interest-bearing liabilities increased 12.2% to $193.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2005, as compared to $172.3 million during 2004, while the cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased 38 basis points from 1.90% during 2004 to 2.28% during 2005. Total average deposits, including noninterest-bearing demand deposits, increased 5.2% to $192.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2005 from $182.9 million during 2004. The Company’s cost of funds (including demand deposits) was 2.00% during 2005, compared to 1.68% for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Average checking and savings account balances were $79.6 million during 2005 and the cost of these funds for the year was 78 basis points, representing a 15 basis point increase over the prior year. Average time deposit balances were $85.2 million and the cost of these funds increased by 24 basis points to 3.25% for the year. The

19

Company continued to benefit from a growing number of commercial customer relationships which resulted in an increase in average demand deposits of 18.7%. As a result of the Bank also relying more on wholesale funding during 2005, average FHLB borrowings increased by $16.0 million to $28.6 million during the year. Since the majority of this funding floats based on an overnight rate, the cost of these funds increased 162 basis points to 3.59% during 2005.

Net Interest Income

2006 Compared to 2005

As previously discussed, the Company’s net interest margin was negatively impacted by the flat yield curve, resulting in a decline of 18 basis points to 3.57%. The shape of the yield curve diluted the positive impact of being asset sensitive during 2006, primarily due to the fact that funding rates, which are primarily short-term, were increasing faster than rates on interest earning assets. As a result, the Company’s net interest income was relatively flat at $8.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2006 as compared to $8.4 million in 2005.

2005 Compared to 2004

The Company’s net interest margin improved during 2005 despite a trend of declining margins in the banking industry. The Company’s net interest margin increased from 3.72% during 2004 to 3.75% during 2005. The Company continues to benefit from its asset sensitive balance sheet position which was advantageous during the period of rising rates that occurred since June 2004. However, the interest rate yield curve has flattened in recent, diluting the impact of the Company’s asset sensitive balance sheet position. As a result of being asset sensitive and the Bank’s ability to grow loans, the Company’s net interest income increased 13.7% to $8.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2005 as compared to $7.4 million in 2004.

20

The following tables illustrate average balances of total interest-earning assets and total interest-bearing liabilities for the periods indicated, showing the average distribution of assets, liabilities, stockholders’ equity and the related income, expense, and corresponding weighted average yields and costs. The average balances used in these tables and other statistical data were calculated using daily average balances.

Average Balances, Income and Expenses, Yields and Rates

	Years Ended December 31,
	2006							2005							2004
	Average Balance			Income/ Expense		Yield/   Rate		Average Balance			Income/ Expense		Yield/   Rate		Average Balance			Income/ Expense		Yield/   Rate
	(Dollars In Thousands)
Assets:
Securities (1)	$	31,504		$	1,533	4.87	%	$	38,141		$	1,607	4.21	%	$	39,192		$	1,595	4.07	%
Loans (net of unearned income):
Real estate mortgage		114,500			6,837	5.97	%		97,888			5,503	5.62	%		83,558			4,732	5.66	%
Commercial		73,529			5,207	7.08	%		70,573			4,540	6.43	%		58,693			3,480	5.93	%
Home equity lines		15,286			1,242	8.13	%		15,636			985	6.30	%		15,473			718	4.64	%
Consumer		2,962			271	9.15	%		2,319			205	8.84	%		2,476			220	8.89	%
Total loans		206,277			13,557	6.57	%		186,416			11,233	6.03	%		160,200			9,150	5.71	%
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks		2,385			109	4.57	%		2,481			81	3.26	%		2,152			25	1.16	%
Total earning assets		240,166			15,199	6.33	%		227,038			12,921	5.69	%		201,544			10,770	5.34	%
Less: allowance for loan losses		(2,873	)						(2,611	)						(2,196	)
Total nonearning assets		19,239							19,841							18,021
Total assets	$	256,532						$	244,268						$	217,369
Liabilities
Interest-bearing deposits:
Checking and savings	$	67,053		$	641	0.96	%	$	79,600		$	620	0.78	%	$	74,536		$	467	0.63	%
Time deposits		103,381			4,322	4.18	%		85,165			2,766	3.25	%		85,123			2,559	3.01	%
Total interest-bearing deposits		170,434			4,963	2.91	%		164,765			3,386	2.06	%		159,659			3,026	1.90	%
FHLB advances		33,668			1,655	4.92	%		28,601			1,028	3.59	%		12,627			249	1.97	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		204,102			6,618	3.24	%		193,366			4,414	2.28	%		172,286			3,275	1.90	%
Non-interest bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits		27,005							27,556							23,215
Other liabilities		475							554							499
Total liabilities		231,582							221,476							196,000
Stockholders’ equity		24,950							22,792							21,369
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	256,532						$	244,268						$	217,369
Net interest income (1)				$	8,581						$	8,507						$	7,495
Interest rate spread (1)(2)						3.09	%						3.41	%						3.44	%
Net interest margin (1)(3)						3.57	%						3.75	%						3.72	%

(1) Presented on a tax equivalent basis. The tax equivalent adjustment to net interest income was $86,000, $70,000 and $73,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

(2) Interest rate spread is the average yield earned on earning assets less the average rate incurred on interest-bearing liabilities.

(3) Net interest margin is derived by dividing net interest income by average total earning assets.

21

The following table describes the impact on the interest income of the Company resulting from changes in average balances and average rates for the periods indicated. The change in interest due to the mixture of volume and rate has been allocated solely to rate changes.

Volume and Rate Analysis

	Years Ended
	December 31, 2006 compared to December 31, 2005									December 31, 2005 compared to December 31, 2004									December 31, 2004 compared to December 31, 2003
	Change Due To:									Change Due To:									Change Due To:
	Volume			Rate			Increase (Decrease)			Volume			Rate			Increase (Decrease)			Volume			Rate			Increase (Decrease)
	(Dollars In Thousands)
Assets:
Securities	$	(280	)	$	206		$	(74	)	$	(43	)	$	53		$	10		$	(150	)	$	16		$	(134	)
Loans (net of unearned income):
Real estate mortgage		934			400			1,334			811			(39	)		772			798			(440	)		358
Commercial		190			477			667			704			356			1,060			1,121			(194	)		927
Home equity lines		(22	)		279			257			8			260			268			81			5			86
Consumer		57			9			66			(14	)		(1	)		(15	)		(11	)		(16	)		(27	)
Total loans		1,159			1,165			2,324			1,509			576			2,085			1,989			(645	)		1,344
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks		(3	)		31			28			4			52			56			(2	)		7			5
Total earning assets	$	876		$	1,402		$	2,278		$	1,470		$	681		$	2,151		$	1,837		$	(622	)	$	1,215
Liabilities
Interest-bearing deposits:
Checking and savings	$	(98	)	$	119		$	21		$	32		$	121		$	153		$	86		$	11		$	97
Time deposits		592			964			1,556			1			206			207			132			(372	)		(240	)
Total interest-bearing deposits		494			1,083			1,577			33			327			360			218			(361	)		(143	)
FHLB advances		182			445			627			315			464			779			119			24			143
Total interest-bearing liabilities		676			1,528			2,204			348			791			1,139			337			(337	)		—
Change in net interest income	$	200		$	(126	)	$	74		$	1,122		$	(110	)	$	1,012		$	1,500		$	(285	)	$	1,215

Interest Sensitivity

Management evaluates interest rate sensitivity periodically through the use of an asset/liability management reporting model. Using this model, management determines the overall magnitude of interest sensitivity risk and then formulates policies governing asset generation and pricing, funding sources and pricing, and off-balance-sheet commitments in order to manage sensitivity risk. These decisions are based on management’s outlook regarding future interest rate movements, the state of the local and national economy, and other financial and business risk factors.

An important element of the Company’s asset/liability management process is monitoring its interest sensitivity gap. The interest sensitivity gap is the difference between interest sensitive assets and interest sensitive liabilities at a specific time interval. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest rate sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities, and is considered negative when the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive assets during a given period. Generally, during a period of rising interest rates, a negative gap within shorter maturities would adversely affect net interest income, while a positive gap within shorter maturities would result in an increase in net interest income. Conversely, during a period of falling interest rates, a negative gap within shorter maturities

22

would result in an increase in net interest income while a positive gap within shorter maturities would have the opposite effect. This gap can be managed by repricing assets or liabilities, by selling investments available for sale, by replacing an asset or liability at maturity, or by adjusting the interest rate during the life of an asset or liability. Matching the amounts of assets and liabilities maturing in the same time interval helps to hedge the risk and minimize the impact on net interest income in periods of rising or falling interest rates.

The following table presents the Company’s interest sensitivity position at December 31, 2006. This one-day position, which continually is changing, is not necessarily indicative of the Company’s position at any other time.

Interest Sensitivity Analysis

	December 31, 2006
	Within 90 Days			91-365 Days			1 to 5 Years			Over 5 Years			Total
	(Dollars In Thousands)
Interest-Earning Assets:
Loans (1)	$	51,288		$	50,645		$	101,080		$	7,585		$	210,598
Securities (2)		2,148			6,198			18,937			2,951			30,234
Money market and other short term securities		2,267			—			—			—			2,267
Other earning assets		—			—			—			3,562			3,562
Total earning assets	$	55,703		$	56,843		$	120,017		$	14,098		$	246,661
Cumulative earning assets	$	55,703		$	112,546		$	232,563		$	246,661		$	246,661
Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
Money market savings	$	17,109		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	17,109
Interest checking (3)		—			—			24,561			—			24,561
Savings (3)		2,214			748			16,193			—			19,155
Certificates of deposit		35,791			42,713			32,374			845			111,723
FHLB advances		22,750			2,000			10,000			483			35,233
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	77,864		$	45,461		$	83,128		$	1,328		$	207,781
Cumulative interest-bearing liabilities	$	77,864		$	123,325		$	206,453		$	207,781		$	207,781
Period gap	$	(22,161	)	$	11,382		$	36,889		$	12,770		$	38,880
Cumulative gap	$	(22,161	)	$	(10,779	)	$	26,110		$	38,880		$	38,880
Ratio of cumulative interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities		71.54	%		91.26	%		112.65	%		118.71	%		118.71	%
Ratio of cumulative gap to total earning assets		(8.98	)%		(4.37	)%		10.59	%		15.76	%		15.76	%

(1) Includes nonaccrual loans of $931,000, which are spread throughout the categories.

(2) All securities without specific maturities are included in the 1 to 5 years category since they are not considered as sensitive to interest rate changes.

(3) Management has determined that interest checking and savings accounts, excluding $855,000 in savings accounts with more frequent rate adjustment terms, are not sensitive to changes in related market rates and, therefore, they are placed in the 1 to 5 years and over 5 years categories, respectively.

Noninterest Income

2006 Compared to 2005

During 2006, the Company continued to benefit in growth of noninterest income, primarily in the areas of deposit account fees and investment brokerage commissions. During the year ended December 31, 2006,

23

noninterest income increased to $3.39 million from $2.38 million in 2005, representing a 42.6% increase. The addition of a courtesy overdraft product helped increase deposit account fees to $2.29 million during 2006, representing a 70.2% increase over the $1.34 million generated in 2005. Deposit account fees consist of charges related insufficient funds, check printing, cashiers checks, service charges, ATM, check cards and others. These fees are core earnings that are not interest sensitive and have provided a stable source of income for the Bank.

Investment brokerage commissions benefited from increased production by the Company’s investment brokers during 2006, one of which was hired during 2005 with fifteen years experience. This resulted in an increase in investment brokerage commissions of 95.9% to $337,200, compared to $172,100 during 2005. The Company also experienced growth of 34.8% and 4.6% in loan fees and other income, respectively, and took advantage of investment portfolio profits by realizing $210,000 of net gains on sales of securities during 2006, compared to $315,900 of gains on the sales of investments and real estate in 2005. Loan fees primarily consist of late charges and prepayment penalties on loans and are also considered core earnings for the Bank.

2005 Compared to 2004

During the year ended December 31, 2005, noninterest income increased to $2.38 million from $1.92 million in 2004, representing a 23.9% increase. Noninterest income benefited from growth in the Company’s ancillary service sectors which include mortgage banking and investment brokerage services. The Bank’s mortgage banking division produced $173,400 in fees during 2005, while the investment brokerage subsidiary generated $172,100 in commissions during the year. During 2005, the Company’s investment subsidiary hired a new investment officer with over fifteen years of experience. The addition of this seasoned broker along with the other brokerage representatives and service offerings provided by the Company should result in additional growth in this sector. Other factors positively impacting noninterest income during 2005 include gains on sales of securities of $166,400 and a one-time gain on the sale of real estate of $149,500.

Deposit account and loan fees increased 5.0% and 40.3%, respective during 2005. Deposit account fees consist of charges related insufficient funds, check printing, cashiers checks, service charges, ATM, check cards and others, while loan fees primarily consist of late charges and prepayment penalties on loans. These fees are core earnings that are not interest sensitive and have provided a stable source of income for the Bank.

Noninterest Expense

2006 Compared to 2005

During 2006, the Company’s noninterest expenses increased to $7.74 million from $6.64 million during 2005, while its efficiency ratio remained relatively flat at 63.99% compared to 63.54% for 2005. The majority of the increase occurred in compensation and benefits expense, primarily resulting from increases in commissions associated with operating the Company’s investment brokerage services, the expensing of stock options granted to non-executive employees and general increase in compensation and other benefits. Compensation and benefits increased by 24.0% to $3.90 million during the year ended December 31, 2006, as compared to $3.14 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.

The Company also took on other customer service initiatives, including expansion of the Bank’s ATM network by seventeen machines, additional internet banking services and other new deposit products. Whiles these initiatives impacted most categories of expenses, the Company should benefit from these initiatives during 2007 and beyond. As a result of these initiatives, occupancy and equipment expenses increased 10.0% to $1.74 million during 2006, compared to $1.59 million for 2005, while data processing costs, professional fees and other expenses increased 4.8%, 26.0% and 11.7%, respectively.

2005 Compared to 2004

Noninterest expense for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased 20.0% to $6.64 million, as compared to $5.56 million during the 2004 period. The 2005 amounts reflect additional costs associated with operating the

24

Company’s new corporate headquarters for an entire year, upgrades to information systems, increases in employee compensation and benefit expense resulting from growth in core banking and ancillary services and additional professional fees, primarily resulting from costs associated with meeting the requirements of Sarbanes-Oxley. As a result, occupancy and equipment expenses increased 13.0% to $1.59 million during 2005, compared to $1.40 million for 2004, while data processing costs increased 12.0% to $762,200 during the year, compared to $680,800 for the prior year. Compensation and benefits increased by 27.8% to $3.14 million during the year ended December 31, 2005, as compared to $2.46 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, while professional fees increased 46.3% to $316,700 in 2005, as compared to $216,500 in 2004. Advertising, promotion and other noninterest expenses increased 4.4% in total to $835,000 during the year ended December 31, 2005, as compared to $800,000 for the 2004 period, primarily due to increased costs associated with growth in the Bank’s internet banking products.

Financial Condition

Loan Portfolio

The Bank’s loan portfolio is comprised of real estate mortgage loans, construction loans, commercial loans, home equity loans, and consumer loans. The primary market areas in which the Bank originates loans are the counties of Accomack and Northampton, Virginia and Salisbury/Wicomico County, Maryland.

Total loans (excluding allowances for loan losses) increased to $210.6 million at December 31, 2006, a 7.7% increase over the $195.5 million outstanding at December 31, 2005. The growth resulted from gross loan production of approximately $82.3 million, primarily in the category of residential real estate. Residential real estate (including construction and land loans) increased 11.3% during 2006, while commercial loans grew 4.0% and consumer and home equity loans were flat during the year.

The following table summarizes the composition of the Bank’s loan portfolio at the dates indicated.

Loan Portfolio

	December 31,
	2006			2005			2004			2003			2002
	(Dollars In Thousands)
Residential mortgage	$	111,890		$	97,245		$	86,537		$	72,339		$	66,637
Commercial mortgage		64,698			61,917			59,414			39,621			28,841
Commercial—other		9,682			9,590			8,673			8,568			4,921
Real estate construction (1)		6,340			9,026			5,658			4,005			2,184
Home equity lines of credit		14,743			15,293			15,581			14,951			12,905
Consumer		3,381			2,559			2,378			2,508			2,720
Total loans		210,734			195,630			178,241			141,992			118,208
Less:
Deferred loan (fees) cost, net		(136	)		(82	)		158			217			205
Allowance for loan losses		(2,873	)		(2,851	)		(2,404	)		(2,002	)		(1,603	)
Net loans	$	207,725		$	192,697		$	175,995		$	140,207		$	116,810

(1) Amounts are disclosed net of loans in process of approximately $2.8 million, $5.9 million, $4.2 million, $3.1 million and $2.3 million for 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

25

The following table sets forth the composition of the Bank’s loan portfolio by percentage at the dates indicated.

Loan Portfolio by Percentage

	December 31,
	2006		2005		2004		2003		2002
Residential mortgage	53.10	%	49.71	%	48.55	%	50.95	%	56.37	%
Commercial mortgage	30.70	%	31.65	%	33.33	%	27.90	%	24.40	%
Commercial—other	4.59	%	4.90	%	4.87	%	6.03	%	4.16	%
Real estate construction	3.01	%	4.61	%	3.18	%	2.82	%	1.85	%
Home equity lines of credit	7.00	%	7.82	%	8.74	%	10.53	%	10.92	%
Consumer	1.60	%	1.31	%	1.33	%	1.77	%	2.30	%
Total loans	100.00	%	100.00	%	100.00	%	100.00	%	100.00	%

The following table presents the maturities of selected loans outstanding at December 31, 2006.

Maturity Schedule of Loans

	December 31, 2006
	Due in one year		Due after one year through five years		Due after five years		Totals		After one year
									Fixed Rate		Variable Rate
	(Dollars In Thousands)
Residential and commercial mortgages	$	19,766	$	50,911	$	105,911	$	176,588	$	32,634	$	124,185
Commercial—other		3,879		3,868		1,935		9,682		1,628		4,178
Real estate construction		6,632		0		0		6,632		0		0
Home equity lines of credit		14,743		0		0		14,743		0		0
Consumer		1,640		1,469		273		3,381		1,742		0
Total	$	46,660	$	56,248	$	108,119	$	211,026	$	36,004	$	128,363

Securities

When securities are purchased, they are classified as securities held to maturity if management has the positive intent and the Company has the ability to hold them until maturity. These investment securities are carried at cost adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discounts. Unrealized losses in the portfolio are not recognized unless management of the Company believes that other than a temporary decline has occurred. Securities held for indefinite periods of time and not intended to be held to maturity are classified as available for sale at the time of purchase. Securities available for sale are recorded at fair value. The net unrealized holding gain or loss on securities available for sale, net of deferred income taxes, is included in other comprehensive income as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. A decline in the fair value of any securities available for sale below cost, that is deemed other than temporary, is charged to earnings and results in a new cost basis for the security. Cost of securities sold is determined on the basis of specific identification. The Company holds no securities classified as trading.

Investment Securities. The carrying value of investment securities (effected for all applicable fair value adjustments) amounted to $30.4 million at December 31, 2006, compared to $32.4 million and $39.0 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Decreases in securities primarily resulted from increased loan demand during 2004 through 2006, slow deposit growth during these periods, and few adequate return opportunities in the investment market. The comparison of amortized cost to fair value is shown in Note 3 of the

26

notes to the financial statements. Note 3 also provides an analysis of gross unrealized gains and losses of investment securities. Investment securities consist of the following:

Investment Securities Portfolio

	Years Ended December 31,
	2006		2005		2004
	(Dollars In Thousands)
Amortized Cost:
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agencies	$	12,942	$	17,546	$	22,208
Tax-exempt municipal bonds		6,414		3,996		3,849
Mortgage-backed securities		1,263		1,528		1,941
Corporate bonds		2,003		2,008		3,021
Adjustable rate loan funds		—		817		1,590
FHLMC stock		232		232		232
Preferred stock		2,898		1,898		1,707
Trust preferred stock		—		—		75
Other equity securities		2,039		1,757		1,666
Total available for sale securities		27,791		29,782		36,289
Other investment securities		2,443		2,461		1,733
Total securities	$	30,234	$	32,243	$	38,022

Securities Available for Sale. Securities available for sale are used as part of the Company’s interest rate risk management strategy and may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, changes in prepayment risk, liquidity needs, the need to increase regulatory capital and other factors. The fair value of securities available for sale totaled $28.0 million at December 31, 2006, compared to $29.9 million and $37.2 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The comparison of fair market value to amortized cost is shown in Note 3 of the notes to the financial statements. Note 3 also provides an analysis of gross unrealized gains and losses of securities available for sale. The following summarizes available for sale securities for the respective periods.

Securities Available for Sale

	Years Ended December 31,
	2006		2005		2004
	(Dollars In Thousands)
Fair Value:
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agencies	$	12,739	$	17,287	$	22,322
Tax-exempt municipal bonds		6,414		3,988		3,892
Mortgage-backed securities		1,221		1,492		1,938
Corporate bonds		2,022		2,060		3,177
Adjustable rate loan funds		—		797		1,569
FHLMC stock		285		275		310
Preferred stock		2,878		1,897		1,735
Trust preferred stock		—		—		171
Other equity securities		2,406		2,094		2,124
Total available for sale securities		27,965		29,890		37,238
Other investment securities		2,443		2,461		1,733
Total securities	$	30,408	$	32,351	$	38,971

27

The following table sets forth the maturity distribution and weighted average yields of the securities portfolio at December 31, 2006. The weighted average yields are calculated on the basis of carrying value of the investment portfolio and on the interest income of investments adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount.

Maturities of Investments

	Available-for-Sale
	Amortized Cost		Fair Market Value		Weighted Average Yield
	(Dollars In Thousands)
U.S. Government Agencies and other U.S. securities:
Within one year	$	4,999	$	4,932	3.48	%
After one year to five years		6,970		6,833	4.20	%
After five years		973		974	5.04	%
Total		12,942		12,739	3.99	%
Municipal Securities:
Within one year		—		—	0.00	%
After one year to five years		2,389		2,385	3.52	%
After five years		4,025		4,029	3.93	%
		6,414		6,414	3.78	%
Mortgage Backed Securities:
Within one year		—		—	0.00	%
After one year to five years		322		308	3.47	%
After five years		941		913	4.79	%
		1,263		1,221	4.46	%
Corporate Bonds:
Within one year		1,002		1,007	6.19	%
After one year to five years		1,001		1,015	6.25	%
After five years		—		—	0.00	%
		2,003		2,022	6.22	%
Other Securities:
No stated maturity		7,612		8,012	5.42	%
Total securities	$	30,234	$	30,408	4.47	%

28

Deposits

The Bank depends on deposits to fund its lending activities, generate fee income opportunities, and create a captive market for loan products. The table below presents a history of average deposits and the rates paid on interest-bearing deposit accounts for the periods indicated.

Average Deposits and Average Rates Paid

	Years Ended December 31,
	2006				2005				2004
	Average Balance		Average Rate		Average Balance		Average Rate		Average Balance		Average Rate
	(Dollars In Thousands)
Interest-bearing deposits:
Checking and savings	$	67,053	0.96	%	$	79,600	0.78	%	$	74,536	0.63	%
Certificates of deposit:
Less than $100,000		77,327	4.10	%		66,146	3.16	%		67,812	2.97	%
$100,000 and over		26,054	4.42	%		19,019	3.54	%		17,311	3.27	%
Total interest-bearing deposits		170,434	2.91	%		164,765	2.06	%		159,659	1.90	%
Noninterest-bearing deposits		27,005	0.00	%		27,556	0.00	%		23,215	0.00	%
Total average deposits	$	197,439	2.51	%	$	192,321	1.76	%	$	182,874	1.65	%

Deposits averaged $197.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2006, an increase of 2.7% and 8.0% over the $192.3 million and $182.9 million during 2005 and 2004, respectively. Interest-bearing demand deposits accounted for the largest portion of the increase, followed by noninterest-bearing demand deposits.

The following table is a summary of the maturity distribution of certificates of deposit in amounts of $100,000 or more as of December 31, 2006.

Maturities of CD’s of $100,000 or More

	December 31, 2006
	Amount		Percent
	(Dollars In Thousands)
Three months or less	$	10,382	36.34	%
Over three months to one year		8,366	29.28	%
Over one year to five years		8,938	31.28	%
Over five years		887	3.10	%
Total	$	28,573	100.00	%

Capital Resources

Capital represents funds, earned or obtained, over which banks can exercise greater control in comparison with deposits and borrowed funds. The adequacy of the Company’s capital is reviewed by management on an ongoing basis with reference to the size, composition, and quality of the Company’s resources and consistent with regulatory requirements and industry standards. Management seeks to maintain a capital structure that will support anticipated asset growth and absorb potential losses.

Banking regulations established to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier I capital to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2006, that the Company meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.

29

The following table details the components of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital and related ratios for the periods indicated.

Analysis of Capital

	December 31,
	2006			2005
	(Dollars In Thousands)
Tier 1 Capital:
Common stock	$	687		$	685
Additional paid-in capital		8,373			8,267
Retained earnings		16,953			14,632
Accumulated other comprehensive income		113			45
Total capital (GAAP)		26,126			23,629
Less: Intangibles		(402	)		(464	)
Net unrealized gain on debt and equity securities		(113	)		(45	)
Total Tier 1 capital		25,611			23,120
Tier 2 Capital:
Allowable allowances for loan losses		2,269			2,152
Net unrealized gains on equity securities		180			161
Total Tier 2 capital	$	28,060		$	25,433
Risk-weighted assets	$	185,991		$	174,986
Capital Ratios (1):
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio		13.77	%		13.21	%
Total risk-based capital ratio		15.09	%		14.53	%
Tier 1 capital to average adjusted total assets		9.93	%		9.44	%

(1) The required minimum capital ratios for capital adequacy purposes, as defined collectively by the federal banking agencies, for Tier 1 risk-based capital, total risk-based capital, and Tier 1 capital to average adjusted assets was 4.0%, 8.0% and 4.0%, respectively. To be considered “well capitalized” under federal prompt corrective action regulations, these same required ratios are 6.0%, 10.0% and 5.0%, respectively. See Note 11 of the notes to the financial statements for a detail of the capital ratios.

Asset Quality

Allowance for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses represents an amount management believes is adequate to provide for probable loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Management evaluates the allowance for loan losses on a regular basis using a methodology that considers various risk factors in accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies. This methodology includes analyzing historical loan losses, existing doubtful accounts, the experience of its lenders, growth by loan category, specific loan risk (i.e. construction loans), economic conditions and loan to value considerations. The outcome of this methodology results in range that is used to determine the Bank’s allowance for loan losses. However, risks of future losses cannot be quantified precisely or attributed to particular loans or classes of loans. Because those risks are influenced by general economic trends as well as conditions affecting individual borrowers, management’s judgment of the allowance is necessarily approximate and imprecise. The allowance is also subject to regulatory examinations and determinations as to adequacy, which may take into account such factors as the methodology used to calculate the allowance and the size of the allowance in comparison to peer banks identified by regulatory agencies.

30

Set forth below is a table detailing the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated.

Allowance for Loan Losses

	Years Ended December 31,
	2006			2005			2004			2003			2002
	(Dollars In Thousands)
Balance, beginning of period	$	2,851		$	2,404		$	2,002		$	1,603		$	1,326
Loans charged off:
Commercial		—			(29	)		(11	)		—			—
Real estate mortgage		—			—			—			(4	)		—
Consumer		(108	)		(18	)		(27	)		(24	)		(83	)
Total loans charged-off		(108	)		(47	)		(38	)		(28	)		(83	)
Recoveries:
Commercial		19			172			11			—			—
Real estate mortgage		—			—			—			—			—
Consumer		52			18			10			47			25
Total recoveries		71			190			21			47			25
Net recoveries (charge-offs)		(37	)		143			(17	)		19			(58	)
Provision for loan losses		59			304			419			380			335
Balance, end of period	$	2,873		$	2,851		$	2,404		$	2,002		$	1,603
Allowance for loan losses to loans outstanding at end of period		1.36	%		1.49	%		1.35	%		1.41	%		1.35	%
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans outstanding at end of period		308.59	%		267.95	%		253.05	%		362.68	%		182.37	%
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans outstanding during period		0.02	%		(0.08	)%		0.01	%		(0.01	)%		0.05	%

During 2006, as has been the case over the past five years, the Bank’s charge-offs continued to be minimal. Over the past five years, charge-offs have primarily occurred in the consumer loan category. During 2004, the Bank obtained possession of additional property related to a loan of which $172,000 was charged during 2001. During 2005, the Bank sold the property, recovered all deficient amounts and recognized a gain of $149,000.

Although growth in the Bank’s loan portfolio during 2006 primarily occurred in the residential real estate category, a significant emphasis has been place on growing the commercial and consumer loan categories over the last several years. Increased competition in the real estate mortgage arena and the desire to diversify contributed to this shift in lending and customer relationships. However, with this change comes increased risk associated with potential loan losses. Based on the results of management’s analysis, it believes that allowances for losses existing at December 31, 2006 are sufficient to cover any anticipated or unanticipated losses on loans outstanding in accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies.

31

An allocation of the allowance for loan losses in dollars and as a percent of the total allowance is provided in the following tables. Because all of these factors are subject to change, the allocation is not necessarily predictive of future loan losses in the indicated categories.

Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses

	Commercial				Real Estate				Consumer
	Allowance for Loan Losses		Percentage of Loan Allowance		Allowance for Loan Losses		Percentage of Loan Allowance		Allowance for Loan Losses		Percentage of Loan Allowance
	(Dollars In Thousands)
December 31,
2006	$	1,846	64.25	%	$	864	30.06	%	$	163	5.68	%
2005		1,949	68.37	%		242	8.49	%		660	23.14	%
2004		1,556	64.73	%		242	10.07	%		606	25.20	%
2003		1,175	58.69	%		278	13.89	%		549	27.42	%
2002		684	42.67	%		249	15.53	%		670	41.80	%

The following table details information concerning nonaccrual and past due loans, as well as foreclosed assets.

Nonperforming Assets

	December 31,
	2006			2005			2004			2003			2002
	(Dollars In Thousands)
Nonaccrual loans:
Commercial	$	73		$	194		$	374		$	126		$	—
Real estate mortgage		832			811			272			321			677
Home equity lines of credit		24			—			120			28			—
Consumer		2			59			184			77			202
Total nonaccrual loans		931			1,064			950			552			879
Other real estate owned		—			—			—			—			—
Total nonperforming assets	$	931		$	1,064		$	950		$	552		$	879
Loans past due 90 or more days accruing interest		—			—			—			—			—
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans		308.59	%		267.95	%		253.05	%		362.68	%		182.37	%
Nonperforming assets to period end loans and other real estate owned		0.44	%		0.56	%		0.53	%		0.39	%		0.74	%

Total nonperforming assets consist of nonaccrual loans and foreclosed properties that are not producing income for the Bank. The Bank’s policy is that whenever a loan reaches 90 days delinquent interest accruals are suspended until six months after the loan becomes current again. In recent years, the Bank has experienced strong asset quality in its loan portfolio. Low interest rates and an exuberant real estate market have created a vibrant lending environment and provided borrowers the opportunity to finance larger purchases at lower costs. Accordingly, trends in total nonperforming assets and the related ratios have been relatively positive for the periods presented.

At December 31, 2006, the Bank identified one loan totaling $3,000 as impaired as defined by generally accepted accounting principles. However, the Bank did not allocate a valuation allowance for this loan at December 31, 2006. At December 31, 2005, the Bank identified $314,000 of loans as impaired as defined by generally accepted accounting principles. Impaired loans at December 2005 had a valuation allowance allocation of $47,000. At December 31, 2004, no loans were identified by the Bank as impaired and, accordingly, no

32

specific allowances were provided with respect to impaired loans. Included in nonaccrual loans at December 31, 2003 and 2002 is one impaired loan to the same borrower with a balance of $126,000 and $368,000, respectively. The balance was partially paid and brought current during 2003. However, the borrower was unable to meet the remaining obligation and, consequently, filed for bankruptcy protection. The Bank entered into an agreement with the bankruptcy trustee to sell the collateral during the first quarter of 2004. Proceeds from these sales were sufficient to satisfy all principal and interest amounts due.

In conjunction with the methodology described above to calculate the allowance for loan losses, the Bank closely monitors individual loans that are deemed to be potential problem loans. Loans are viewed as potential problem loans when possible credit problems of borrowers or industry trends cause management to have doubts as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with current repayment terms. Those loans are subject to regular management attention, and their status is reviewed on a regular basis. In instances where management determines that a specific allowance should be set, the Bank takes such action as deemed appropriate.

As of December 31, 2006, all loans 60 days or more delinquent, including nonperforming loans, totaled $1.14 million. Additionally, other performing loans totaling $4.49 million existed that were current, but had other potential weaknesses that management considers to warrant additional monitoring. All loans in these categories are subject to constant management attention, and their status is reviewed on a regular basis. These loans are generally secured by residential and commercial real estate and equipment with appraised values that exceed the remaining principal balances on such loans.

Liquidity; Asset Management

Liquidity represents the Company’s ability to meet present and future obligations through the sale or maturity of existing assets or the acquisition of additional funds through liability management. Liquid assets include cash, interest-bearing deposits with banks, federal funds sold, investments maturing within one year, and investments that are categorized as available-for-sale. The Company’s ability to obtain deposits and purchase funds at favorable rates impacts its liability liquidity. As a result of the Company’s management of liquid assets and the ability to generate liquidity through liability funding, management believes that the Company maintains overall liquidity that is sufficient to satisfy its depositor’s requirements and meet its customers’ credit needs.

The table below summarizes the Company’s balance sheet liquidity position for the periods presented. Additionally, alternative sources of liquidity are available to the Company in the wholesale funding markets including its capacity to borrow additional funds or purchased brokered certificates of deposits. The Bank has an available line of credit with the FHLB for up to 25% of Bank assets, or approximately $64.4 million at December 31, 2006. However, the Bank may request an increase in this borrowing capacity from the FHLB. At December 31, 2006 the Bank had sufficient collateral pledged to borrow a total of approximately $77.6 million from the FHLB. The borrowing capacity is subject to certain collateral requirements as stipulated in the FHLB borrowing agreement. Additionally, the Bank maintains other available borrowing arrangements of approximately $8.4 million. Based on these factors, the Company maintains sufficient liquidity to meet anticipated needs.

Summary of Liquid Assets

	December 31,
	2006			2005			2004
	(Dollars In Thousands)
Cash and due from banks	$	9,470		$	9,176		$	9,415
Available-for-sale and other securities		30,408			32,351			38,971
Total liquid assets	$	39,878		$	41,527		$	48,386
Deposits and other liabilities	$	234,550		$	223,790		$	215,730
Ratio of liquid assets to deposits and other liabilities		17.00	%		18.56	%		22.43	%

33

Total cash and cash equivalents were $9.5 million at December 31, 2006, compared to $9.2 million and $9.4 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Net cash flows from operating activities were $3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to $3.0 million and $3.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. This fluctuation primarily resulted from net income growth and other changes in normal operating activities during the periods.

Net cash flows used for investing activities were $13.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to $11.1 million and $38.3 million during the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Steady loan growth continued with net originations of $15.1 million, $17.1 million and $36.2 million during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Other investment activities continued to be slow due to liquidity needs for loan growth.

Net cash flows from financing activities were $9.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to $7.8 million and $38.5 million during 2005 and 2004, respectively. Deposits increased $9.1 million in 2006, primarily due to growth in time deposits, compared to a decline of $3.8 million during 2005 and growth of $33.8 million in 2004. As was the case in 2005, the Bank’s deposit markets continued to be very competitive during 2006, resulting in a more challenging environment to grow retail deposits profitably. Therefore, wholesale funding sources continued to be used during 2006 to fund liquidity shortfalls. In the past, the Bank had primarily used FHLB borrowings as its main wholesale funding source. However, the Bank purchased $7.0 million of brokered time deposits during 2006 since they were a less expensive alternative funding source than FHLB advances at that time. Accordingly, net proceeds from FHLB borrowings were fairly flat at $1.2 million during 2006, compared to $12.1 million and $5.1 million during 2005 and 2004, respectively. Proceeds from wholesale funds were used to fund loan growth during 2006.

The Bank occasionally finds it necessary to borrow funds on a short-term basis due to fluctuations in loan and deposit levels. The Bank has several arrangements whereby it may borrow funds overnight and on terms. As discussed above, the Bank currently has borrowing capacity of approximately $64.4 million, provided it meets all borrowing guidelines with the FHLB. At December 31, 2006, the Bank had $35.2 million in outstanding FHLB advances, compared to $34.1 million at December 31, 2005.

The following table details information concerning the Bank’s short-term borrowings for the periods presented.

Summary of Borrowed Funds

	December 31,
	2006			2005			2004
	(Dollars In Thousands)
Actual period end balances	$	24,750		$	25,500		$	21,350
Monthly average balance of short-term borrowings outstanding during the period	$	19,542		$	21,033		$	6,915
Weighted-average interest rate on monthly average short-term borrowings		5.09	%		3.34	%		1.72	%
Maximum month-end balance of short-term borrowings outstanding during the period	$	29,150		$	28,500		$	21,350

34

Contractual Obligations, Contingent Liabilities and Commitments

The following table summarizes the Company’s significant contractual obligations, contingent liabilities and certain other commitments outstanding at December 31, 2006:

	Payments Due By Period
Contractual Obligations	Total		Less Than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More Than 5 Years
	(Dollars In Thousands)
Operating lease obligations	$	167	$	76	$	91	$	—	$	—
Other long-term liabilities reflected on the Company’s balance sheet under GAAP Federal Home Loan Bank Advances		35,233		24,750		10,000		—		483
Other commitments
Standby letters of credit		984		984		—		—		—
Commitments to extend credit		44,589		44,589		—		—		—
Total contractual obligations	$	80,973	$	70,399	$	10,091	$	—	$	483

Return on Equity and Assets

The following table summarizes ratios considered to be significant indicators of the Company’s profitability and financial condition during the periods indicated.

Return on Equity and Assets

	December 31,
	2006		2005		2004
Return on average assets	1.14	%	1.10	%	1.08	%
Return on average equity	11.76	%	11.74	%	11.01	%
Average equity to average asset ratio	9.73	%	9.33	%	9.83	%
Dividend payout ratio	21.19	%	20.16	%	19.30	%

Critical Accounting Policies and Judgments

The accounting principles followed by the Company and the methods of applying these principles conform with generally accepted accounting principles and to general practices within the banking industry. Our most critical accounting policies require management’s judgment to ascertain the valuation of assets, liabilities, commitments and contingencies. These policies require the use of subjective and complex estimates, assumptions and judgments, which are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements and are important to our reported financial condition and results of operations. Accordingly, as this information changes, our financial statements could reflect different estimates, assumptions and judgments and as such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported.

The allowance for loan losses is established and maintained at levels management deems adequate to cover losses inherent in the loan portfolio, based upon our evaluation of the risks in the portfolio and changes in the nature and volume of loan activity. Management evaluates the allowance for loan losses on a regular basis using a methodology that considers historical loan losses, existing doubtful accounts, the experience of its lenders, growth by loan category, specific loan risk (i.e. construction loans), economic conditions and loan to value considerations. Additionally, we consider the impact of economic events and other market factors, the outcome of which is uncertain. While we use the best information available in establishing the allowance, actual economic conditions differing significantly from our assumptions in determining the loan loss valuation allowance may result in future adjustments, or regulators may require adjustments based upon information available to them at

35

the time of their examinations. Although we believe that our allowance for loan losses is adequate and properly recorded in our financial statements, differing economic conditions or alternate methods of estimation could result in materially different amounts of loan losses.

The estimation of fair value is significant to several of our assets, including available-for-sale (“AFS”) investment securities and real estate owned (“REO”). AFS securities are recorded at fair value, while REO is generally recorded at the lower of cost or fair value (less estimated selling costs). Fair values can be volatile and may be influenced by a number of factors, including market interest rates, prepayment speeds, discount rates and market conditions, among others. Since these factors can change significantly and rapidly, fair values are difficult to predict and are subject to material changes, which could impact our financial condition.

Impact of Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections,” which changes the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. This statement applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principles and changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the unusual instance that the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions. This statement requires retrospective application to prior period financial statements of changes in accounting principle, unless it is impractical to determine either the period-specific or cumulative effects of the change. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

In November 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 115-1 and 124-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments. The guidance in this FSP addresses the determination of when an investment is considered impaired, whether that impairment is other than temporary, and the measurement of an impairment loss. The FSP also includes accounting considerations subsequent to the recognition of other-than temporary impairment and requires certain disclosures about unrealized losses that have not been recognized as other-than-temporary impairments. The guidance in this FSP is required to be applied to reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted, but the Company did not adopt the recognition provisions of this standard until January 1, 2006. The disclosure provisions were adopted in previous years. The adoption of this Statement did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) released Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (“SAB 108”), which provides detail in the quantification and correction of financial statement misstatements. SAB 108 specifies that companies should apply a combination of the “rollover” and “iron curtain” methodologies when making determinations of materiality. The rollover method quantifies a misstatement based on the amount of the error originating in the current year income statement. The iron curtain approach quantifies misstatements based on the effects of correcting the misstatement existing in the balance sheet at the end of the current year, regardless of the year(s) of origination. SAB 108 instructs companies to quantify the misstatement under both methodologies and, if either method results in the determination of a material error, the Company must adjust its financial statements to correct the error. SAB 108 also reminds preparers that a change from an accounting principle that is not generally accepted to a principle that is generally accepted is a correction of an error. The Bulletin is effective for annual financial statements covering the first fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006. The adoption of this Bulletin did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140.” This statement amends Statements No. 133 and 140 by: permitting fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument with an embedded derivative that

36

otherwise would require bifurcation; clarifying which interest-only strips and principal-only strips are not subject to the requirements of Statement No. 133; establishing a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation; clarifying that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives; and amending Statement No. 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose entity from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial instrument. The statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. The adoption of this standard is not anticipated to have a material impact on financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140.” This statement amends Statement No. 140 with respect to the accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. It requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability each time an obligation is undertaken to service a financial asset by entering into a servicing contract in certain situations, and requires all separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities to be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. The statement permits the choice between the “amortization method” and the “fair value measurement method” for the subsequent measurement of the servicing assets or liabilities, and allows for a one-time reclassification of available-for-sale securities to trading securities at initial adoption. The statement also requires separate presentation of servicing assets and servicing liabilities subsequently measured at fair value in the statement of financial position, and additional disclosures for all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. The statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2006. The adoption of this standard is not anticipated to have a material impact on financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement 109,” which provides guidance on the measurement, recognition, and disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, and disclosure. FIN 48 prescribes that a tax position should only be recognized if it is more-likely-than-not that the position will be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authority. A tax position that meets this threshold is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is more likely than not (greater than 50 percent) realized upon ultimate settlement. The cumulative effect of applying FIN 48 is to be reported as an adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is assessing the impact, if any, that adoption may have on its financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. While the Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, it does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In addition, the Statement establishes a fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. Lastly, SFAS No. 157 requires additional disclosures for each interim and annual period separately for each major category of assets and liabilities. The Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Management does not expect the adoption of this Statement to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans. “This Statement requires an employer that is a business entity and sponsors one or more single-employer defined benefit plans to: recognize the funded status of a benefit plan—measured as the difference between plan assets at fair value (with limited exceptions) and the benefit obligation—in its statement of financial position; recognize as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the gains or losses

37

and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost pursuant to other specified standards; measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end statement of financial position (with limited exceptions); and disclose in the notes to financial statements additional information about certain effects on net periodic benefit cost for the next fiscal year that arise from delayed recognition of the gains or losses, prior service costs or credits, and transition asset or obligation. An employer with publicly traded equity securities is required to initially recognize the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan and to provide the required disclosures as of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006. Management does not expect the adoption of this Statement to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”, which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value and also establishes fair presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is assessing the impact, if any, that adoption will have on its financial statements.

Effects of Inflation

The Company believes that its net interest income and results of operations have not been significantly affected by inflation during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.

Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company uses a third party provider to perform computer modeling methodologies that assist in determining the overall magnitude of interest sensitivity risk. Based on these methodologies, management formulates policies governing asset generation and pricing, funding sources and pricing, and off-balance-sheet commitments in order to reduce sensitivity risk. These decisions are based on management’s outlook regarding future interest rate movements, the state of the local and national economy, and other financial and business risk factors.

The modeling methodologies used measure interest rate sensitivity by analyzing the potential impact on net interest income under various interest rate scenarios. One such scenario would assume a hypothetical 200 basis point instantaneous and parallel shift in the yield curve in interest rates. Accordingly, management modeled the impact of a 200 basis point decline in interest rates and a 200 basis point increase in interest rates at December 31, 2006. The model indicates that a 200 basis point instantaneous and parallel decrease in the yield curve in interest rates would cause net interest income to increase by $14,000, while a 200 basis point instantaneous and parallel increase in the yield curve in interest rates would cause net interest income to decrease by $138,000.

The computer model uses standard algebraic formula for calculating present value. The calculation discounts the future cash flows of the Company’s portfolio of interest rate sensitive instruments to present value utilizing techniques designed to approximate current market rates for securities, current offering rates for loans, and the cost of alternative funding for the given maturity of deposits and then assumes an instantaneous and parallel shift in these rates. The difference between these numbers represents the resulting hypothetical change in the fair value of interest rate sensitive instruments.

As with any modeling techniques, certain limitations and shortcomings are inherent in the Company’s methodology. Significant assumptions must be made in the calculation including: (1) no growth in volume or balance sheet mix; (2) constant market interest rates reflecting the average rate from the last month of the given quarter; and (3) pricing spreads to market rates derived from an historical analysis, or from assumptions by instrument type. Additionally, the computations do not contemplate certain actions management could undertake in response to changes in interest rates.

38

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition

	December 31,
	2006		2005
ASSETS
Cash (including interest—earning deposits of approximately $2,267,000 and $1,775,300, respectively)	$	9,469,800	$	9,176,000
Investment securities:
Available-for-sale (amortized cost of $27,791,300 and $29,781,900, respectively)		27,965,300		29,889,900
Other investments, at cost		2,442,700		2,460,900
Loans receivable, net		207,725,200		192,696,500
Premises and equipment, net		7,044,300		7,464,600
Other assets		6,028,700		5,731,000
	$	260,676,000	$	247,418,900
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits:
Interest-bearing	$	172,548,300	$	160,105,000
Noninterest-bearing		25,554,500		28,864,700
Total deposits		198,102,800		188,969,700
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		35,233,300		34,050,000
Other liabilities		1,213,600		770,600
Total liabilities		234,549,700		223,790,300
Stockholders’ equity
Preferred stock, par value $1 per share, 500,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding		—		—
Common stock, par value $.275 and $.33 per share, respectively; 6,000,000 and 5,000,000 shares authorized, respectively; 2,497,327 and 2,074,207 issued and outstanding, respectively		686,800		684,500
Additional capital		8,372,600		8,267,400
Retained earnings		16,953,400		14,631,400
Accumulated other comprehensive income		113,500		45,300
Total stockholders’ equity		26,126,300		23,628,600
	$	260,676,000	$	247,418,900

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

39

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Income

	Years Ended December 31,
	2006		2005		2004
Interest and dividend income
Loans	$	13,556,500	$	11,232,700	$	9,150,300
Investments
Taxable interest		1,143,900		1,307,600		1,247,600
Tax-exempt interest		167,400		135,600		140,800
Dividends		244,700		174,600		158,800
Total interest and dividend income		15,112,500		12,850,500		10,697,500
Interest expense
Deposits		4,962,700		3,385,900		3,025,900
FHLB/other advances		1,654,800		1,028,100		249,300
Total interest expense		6,617,500		4,414,000		3,275,200
Net interest income		8,495,000		8,436,500		7,422,300
Provision for loan losses		58,700		303,700		418,800
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		8,436,300		8,132,800		7,003,500
Noninterest income
Deposit account fees		2,286,400		1,343,100		1,279,500
Loan fees		159,100		118,000		84,100
Mortgage banking fees		130,600		173,400		9,300
Commissions on investment brokerage sales		337,200		172,100		119,400
Gains on sales of securities		210,000		166,400		148,100
Gains on sale of real estate		—		149,500		—
Other		268,600		256,900		278,700
Total noninterest income		3,391,900		2,379,400		1,919,100
Noninterest expense
Compensation and employee benefits		3,897,600		3,144,100		2,459,300
Occupancy and equipment		1,744,300		1,586,100		1,403,200
Data processing		799,000		762,200		680,800
Professional fees		398,900		316,700		216,500
Advertising and promotion		132,300		148,200		162,300
Other		767,100		686,800		637,000
Total noninterest expense		7,739,200		6,644,100		5,559,100
Income before income taxes		4,089,000		3,868,100		3,363,500
Income taxes		1,155,900		1,192,800		1,010,700
Net income	$	2,933,100	$	2,675,300	$	2,352,800
Earnings Per Common Share:
Basic	$	1.18	$	1.08	$	0.95
Diluted	$	1.16	$	1.06	$	0.93

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

40

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

	Number of Shares	Common Stock		Additional Capital		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total
Balance, December 31, 2003	2,061,724	$	680,400	$	8,164,600	$	10,595,300		$	760,900		$	20,201,200
Common stock cash dividend declared	—		—		—		(453,700	)		—			(453,700	)
Exercise of stock options	1,560		500		13,500		—			—			14,000
Tax benefit associated with the exercise of stock options	—		—		20,900		—			—			20,900
Comprehensive income	—		—		—		2,352,800			(176,200	)		2,176,600
Balance, December 31, 2004	2,063,284		680,900		8,199,000		12,494,400			584,700			21,959,000
Common stock cash dividend declared	—		—		—		(538,300	)		—			(538,300	)
Exercise of stock options, net of 1,492 of existing shares exchanged in lieu of exercise payment	10,923		3,600		59,100		—			—			62,700
Tax benefit associated with the exercise of stock options	—		—		9,300		—			—			9,300
Comprehensive income (loss)	—		—		—		2,675,300			(539,400	)		2,135,900
Balance, December 31, 2005	2,074,207		684,500		8,267,400		14,631,400			45,300			23,628,600
Common stock cash dividend declared	—		—		—		(610,300	)		—			(610,300	)
Exercise of stock options	7,804		2,300		53,900		—			—			56,200
Compensation expense associated with the granting of stock options	—		—		40,400		—			—			40,400
Tax benefit associated with the exercise of stock options	—		—		10,900		—			—			10,900
6-for-5 Stock Split	415,316		—		—		(800	)		—			(800	)
Comprehensive income	—		—		—		2,933,100			68,200			3,001,300
Balance, December 31, 2006	2,497,327	$	686,800	$	8,372,600	$	16,953,400		$	113,500		$	26,126,300

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

41

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

	Years Ended December 31,
	2006			2005			2004
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	2,933,100		$	2,675,300		$	2,352,800
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		58,700			303,700			418,800
Depreciation and amortization		746,200			731,500			576,400
Amortization of premium and accretion of discount on securities, net		6,600			65,500			70,800
Gain on sale of investment securities		(210,000	)		(166,400	)		(148,100	)
Gain on sale of real estate		—			(149,500	)		—
Loss on disposal of fixed assets		—			6,500			700
Gain on noncash donation		(15,300	)		—			(4,000	)
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance		(147,200	)		(134,600	)		(135,500	)
Compensation expense on stock options granted		40,400			—			—
Tax benefit of stock options exercised		10,900			9,300			20,900
Changes in:
Deferred loan fees		54,000			(34,100	)		32,800
Other assets		(213,400	)		(75,000	)		(157,500	)
Other liabilities		443,000			(255,100	)		450,600
Net cash flows from operating activities		3,707,000			2,977,100			3,478,700
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of available-for-sale securities		(4,984,900	)		(3,108,400	)		(4,437,900	)
Proceeds from maturities, sales and calls of available-for-sale securities		7,194,200			9,716,600			6,481,500
Purchase of other investments		(2,804,500	)		(3,709,300	)		(638,300	)
Proceeds from maturities, sales and calls of other investments		2,822,700			2,981,300			39,900
Proceeds from sale of real estate		—			323,100			—
Loan originations, net of repayments		(15,141,400	)		(17,144,500	)		(36,240,200	)
Purchase of premises and equipment		(260,800	)		(115,200	)		(3,552,600	)
Net cash flows from investing activities		(13,174,700	)		(11,056,400	)		(38,347,600	)

42

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

	Years Ended December 31,
	2006			2005			2004
Cash flows from financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in demand deposits	$	(13,911,500	)	$	(2,177,400	)	$	21,478,200
Net increase (decrease) in time deposits		23,043,800			(1,590,000	)		12,368,200
Proceeds from FHLB advances		169,400,000			133,600,000			64,852,000
Repayments of FHLB advances		(168,216,700	)		(121,516,700	)		(59,768,600	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		56,200			62,700			14,000
Payment of dividends on common stock		(610,300	)		(538,300	)		(453,700	)
Net cash flows from financing activities		9,761,500			7,840,300			38,490,100
Change in cash and cash equivalents		293,800			(239,000	)		3,621,200
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		9,176,000			9,415,000			5,793,800
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	9,469,800		$	9,176,000		$	9,415,000
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Cash paid during the year for interest	$	6,204,300		$	4,288,700		$	3,167,200
Cash paid during the year for income taxes	$	1,220,000		$	1,158,500		$	1,010,700
Conversion of Trust Preferred Stock investment to common stock	$	—		$	72,000			75,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

43

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1—ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS

Shore Financial Corporation (the “Company”) is a Virginia corporation organized in September 1997 by Shore Bank (the “Bank”) for the purpose of becoming a unitary holding company of the Bank. The Company became a unitary holding company of the Bank on March 16, 1998. The business and management of the Company consists of the business and management of the Bank. The Bank became a Virginia chartered, Federal Reserve member, commercial bank on March 31, 1998. Previously, the Bank was a federally chartered savings bank. The Company and the Bank are headquartered on the Eastern Shore in Onley, Virginia.

The Company’s assets primarily consist of approximately $6.0 million in cash and investments and its investment in the Bank. Currently, the Company does not participate in any other activities outside of controlling the Bank. The Bank provides a full range of banking services to individual and corporate customers through its seven banking offices located on the Eastern Shore of Virginia and Maryland, including the counties of Accomack and Northampton, Virginia, and the Salisbury/Wicomico County area in Maryland. The Company’s common stock became publicly traded in August 1997, upon completing its subscription rights and initial public offerings, which included the sale of 431,250 shares of common stock.

Shore Investments, Inc. (“Shore Investments”), a subsidiary of the Bank, engages in financial activities supporting the Bank’s operations. These activities include, but are not limited to, the selling of investment and insurance products. The Bank’s subsidiary is invested in a title insurance agency and an investment company while the Company is invested in a trust company, all of which provide services to banking customers.

NOTE 2—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation and Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, the Bank and Shore Investments. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses and the valuation of real estate owned.

Advertising

The Company expenses advertising costs as they are incurred.

Investment Securities

Investments in debt securities classified as held-to-maturity are stated at cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts using the interest method. Management has a positive intent and ability to hold these securities to maturity and, accordingly, adjustments are not made for temporary declines in their market value below amortized cost. Investments in debt and equity securities classified as trading, if any, are stated at fair value. Unrealized holding gains and losses for trading securities are included in the statement of income. The Company had no such securities during the periods reported in the financial statements. All other

44

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 2—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

investment securities with readily determinable fair values are classified as available-for-sale. Unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are excluded from earnings and reported, net of tax effect, in other comprehensive income until realized.

Investments in Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, Community Bankers’ Bank and Maryland Financial Bank stock are stated at cost, as these securities are restricted and do not have readily determinable fair values.

Gains and losses on the sale of securities are determined using the specific identification method. Other-than-temporary declines in the fair value of individual held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities below their cost, if any, are included in earnings as realized losses.

Loans Receivable

Loans receivable consist of real estate loans secured by first deeds of trust on single-family residences, other residential property, commercial property and land located primarily in an area known as the Eastern Shore of Virginia and Maryland, as well as secured and unsecured consumer and commercial loans.

Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or pay-off generally are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balances adjusted for charge-offs, the allowance for loan losses, and any deferred fees or costs on originated loans. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized as an adjustment of the related loan yield using the interest method.

The Bank places loans on nonaccrual status after being delinquent greater than 90 days, or earlier, if the loans have developed inherent problems prior to being 90 days delinquent that indicate payments of principal or interest will not be made in full. Whenever the accrual of interest is stopped, a specific allowance is established through a charge to income for previously accrued but uncollected interest income. Thereafter, interest is recognized only as cash is received until six months after the loan is brought current.

The allowance for loan losses represents an amount management believes is adequate to provide for probable loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Management evaluates the allowance for loan losses on a regular basis using a methodology that considers various risk factors in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies. This methodology includes analyzing historical loan losses, existing doubtful accounts, the experience of its lenders, growth by loan category, specific loan risk (i.e. construction loans), economic conditions and loan to value considerations. However, risks of future losses cannot be quantified precisely or attributed to particular loans or classes of loans. Because those risks are influenced by general economic trends as well as conditions affecting individual borrowers, management’s judgment of the allowance is necessarily approximate and imprecise. The allowance is also subject to regulatory examinations and determinations as to adequacy, which may take into account such factors as the methodology used to calculate the allowance and the size of the allowance in comparison to peer banks identified by regulatory agencies. In the opinion of management, the present allowance is adequate to absorb reasonably foreseeable loan losses. Additions to the allowance are reflected in current operations. Charge-offs to the allowance are made when the loan is considered uncollectible or is transferred to real estate acquired in settlement of loans.

A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all principal and interest amounts according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. A performing loan may be considered

45

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 2—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

impaired. The allowance for loan losses related to loans identified as impaired is primarily based on the excess of the loan’s current outstanding principal balance over the estimated fair value of the related collateral. For a loan that is not collateral-dependent, the allowance is recorded at the amount by which the outstanding principal balance exceeds the current best estimate of the future cash flows on the loan discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Bank does not separately identify individual consumer and residential loans for impairment disclosures.

For impaired loans that are on nonaccrual status, cash payments received are generally applied to reduce the outstanding principal balance. However, all or a portion of a cash payment received on a nonaccrual loan may be recognized as interest income to the extent allowed by the loan contract, assuming management expects to fully collect the remaining principal balance on the loan.

Credit Related Financial Instruments

In the ordinary course of business, the Bank has entered into commitments to extend credit, including commitments under home equity lines of credit, overdraft protection arrangements, commercial lines of credit, and standby letters of credit. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are funded.

Transfers of Financial Assets

Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the assets have been isolated from the Bank, (2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that restrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (3) the Bank does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.

Real Estate Owned

Real estate acquired through foreclosure is initially recorded at the lower of fair value or the loan balance at date of foreclosure. Subsequently, property that is held for resale is carried at the lower of cost or fair value minus estimated selling costs. Costs relating to the development and improvement of property are capitalized, whereas those relating to holding the property are charged to expense.

Management periodically performs valuations, and an allowance for losses is established by a charge to operations if the carrying value of a property exceeds its fair value minus estimated selling costs.

Premises and Equipment

Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using accelerated and straight-line methods over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Estimated useful lives are as follows:

Buildings	25 to 40 years
Furniture and equipment	5 to 15 years
Computer equipment and software	3 to 5 years
Automobiles	3 to 5 years

46

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 2—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes payable represent the cumulative tax effect from temporary differences in the recognition of taxable or deductible amounts for income tax and financial reporting purposes.

Prior to July 1, 1996, in computing federal income taxes, savings banks that met certain definitional tests and other conditions prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code were allowed, within limitations, to deduct from taxable income an allowance for bad debts based on actual loss experience, a percentage of taxable income before such deduction or an amount based on a percentage of eligible loans. The applicable percentage of taxable income used for the bad debt deduction was 8%. Effective July 1, 1996, the percentage of taxable income method and the percentage of eligible loans method for determining the bad debt deduction are no longer available. At December 31, 2006, the cumulative bad debt reserve, upon which no taxes have been paid on tax returns, was approximately $1.2 million. Of this amount, $783,000 represents that portion of the cumulative bad debt reserve for which financial statement income taxes have not been provided, in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.

Earnings Per Common Share

Basic Earnings Per Share (“EPS”) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised, converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the entity. Potential common shares that may be issued by the Company relate solely to outstanding stock options, and are determined using the treasury stock method.

Comprehensive Income

Accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income. Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the balance sheet, such items, along with net income, are components of comprehensive income.

Segment Reporting

Public business enterprises are required to report information about operating segments in annual financial statements, and selected information about operating segments in financial reports issued to shareholders. Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available, and evaluated regularly by management in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Generally, financial information is required to be reported on the basis that it is used internally for evaluating segment performance and deciding how to allocate resources to segments.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Transactions

SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, (collectively referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities. It requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial condition and measure those instruments at fair value. The Company did not hold derivatives during the periods reported on in the consolidated financial statements.

47

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 2—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

On March 13, 2002, the FASB determined that loan commitments related to the acquisition or origination of mortgage loans that will be held for sale must be accounted for as derivative instruments, effective for fiscal quarter beginning after April 20, 2002. Accordingly, the Company adopted such accounting on July 1, 2002. The Company did not hold any mortgage loans for sale during the periods reported on in the consolidated financial statements.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents include currency, balances due from banks, interest-earning deposits with maturities of ninety days or less and federal funds sold.

The Company is required to maintain reserves with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. The aggregate daily average reserves required for the final reporting period was $25,000 for each of the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, which was satisfied by the Company.

Goodwill and Other Intangibles

The Company adopted Statement of Financial Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“SFAS 142”), effective January 1, 2002. Accordingly, goodwill is no longer subject to amortization over its estimated useful life, but is subject to an annual assessment for impairment by applying a fair value based test. Additionally, under SFAS 142, acquired intangible assets are separately recognized if the benefit of the asset can be sold, transferred, licensed, rented, or exchanged, and amortized over their useful life. Branch acquisition transactions were outside the initial scope of SFAS 142 and, accordingly, intangible assets related to such transactions continued to amortize upon the adoption of SFAS 142. However, in October 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 147, Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 72 and 144 and FASB Interpretation No. 9. This statement amends previous interpretative guidance on the application of the purchase method of accounting to acquisitions of financial institutions, and requires the application of FASB Statement No. 141, Business Combinations, and FASB No. 142 to branch acquisitions if such transactions meet the definition of a business combination.

Management has evaluated the deposit acquisition that occurred in 2002. The acquisition of the Susquehanna Bank deposits in the Salisbury, Maryland market do not qualify as a business combination and the intangible asset related to this deposit acquisition will continue to be amortized over the estimated useful life of the deposits acquired.

Stock Compensation Plans

Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock compensation using the intrinsic value based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, whereby compensation cost is the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the stock at the grant date (or other measurement date) over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. Stock options issued under the Company’s stock option plans prior to January 1, 2006 had no intrinsic value at the grant date, and under Opinion No. 25 no compensation cost was recognized for them. On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS 123(r), Share-Based Payment. The standard eliminated the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions under the intrinsic value method and required that such transactions be accounted for using a fair value-based method which results in the recognition of compensation expense in the Company’s statement of income. For the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company recognized $40,300 of such expense.

48

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 2—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure—an amendment of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, was issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in December, 2002. SFAS 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results.

In accordance with SFAS 148, the Company provides disclosures as if the fair value-based method of measuring all outstanding stock options was already adopted and recognized in 2005. The following table presents the effect on net income and on basic and diluted net income per share as if the fair value-based method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards at December 31, 2005 and 2004. Since the fair-value based method was adopted in 2006, no such disclosure is necessary for the year ended December 31, 2006.

	Years Ended December 31,
	2005			2004
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Net income, as reported	$	2,675,300		$	2,352,800
Deduct:
Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects		(116,600	)		(60,200	)
Pro forma net income	$	2,558,700		$	2,292,600
Earnings per share:
Basic—as reported	$	1.08		$	0.95
Basic—pro forma	$	1.03		$	0.93
Diluted—as reported	$	1.06		$	0.93
Diluted—pro forma	$	1.01		$	0.91

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2006		2005		2004
Dividend yield	1.90	%	1.90	%	1.44	%
Expected life (years)	5.5		5.5		5.6
Expected volatility	25.00	%	25.00	%	25.00	%
Risk-free interest rate	4.65	%	4.65	%	4.30	%

Accounting for Long-Lived Assets

Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted FASB Statement No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. The statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. The statement specifies criteria for classifying assets as held for sale. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

49

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 2—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Guarantees

FASB Interpretation No. 45, Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees (“FIN 45”), requires that a liability be recognized, at inception, for the fair value of certain guarantees and for the ongoing obligation, if any, to perform over the term of the guarantee. The recognition provisions of FIN 45 are effective for certain guarantees modified or issued after December 31, 2002. The adoption of FIN 45 did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operation or financial condition.

Lease Commitments

The Company enters into lease commitments for the use of certain real estate facilities as considered necessary to conduct its operations. These commitments are often for terms of five years with additional renewal options available and generally require monthly lease payments. These leases qualify as operating leases under applicable accounting guidance and, therefore, the monthly lease payments are expensed as incurred.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications of the prior years’ information have been made to conform to the December 31, 2006 presentation.

Accounting Changes

In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections,” which changes the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. This statement applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principles and changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the unusual instance that the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions. This statement requires retrospective application to prior period financial statements of changes in accounting principle, unless it is impractical to determine either the period-specific or cumulative effects of the change. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

In November 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 115-1 and 124-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments. The guidance in this FSP addresses the determination of when an investment is considered impaired, whether that impairment is other than temporary, and the measurement of an impairment loss. The FSP also includes accounting considerations subsequent to the recognition of other-than temporary impairment and requires certain disclosures about unrealized losses that have not been recognized as other-than-temporary impairments. The guidance in this FSP is required to be applied to reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted, but the Company did not adopt the recognition provisions of this standard until January 1, 2006. The disclosure provisions were adopted in previous years. The adoption of this Statement did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) released Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (“SAB 108”), which provides detail in the quantification and correction of financial statement misstatements. SAB 108 specifies that companies should apply a combination of the “rollover” and “iron curtain” methodologies when making determinations of materiality. The rollover method

50

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 2—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

quantifies a misstatement based on the amount of the error originating in the current year income statement. The iron curtain approach quantifies misstatements based on the effects of correcting the misstatement existing in the balance sheet at the end of the current year, regardless of the year(s) of origination. SAB 108 instructs companies to quantify the misstatement under both methodologies and, if either method results in the determination of a material error, the Company must adjust its financial statements to correct the error. SAB 108 also reminds preparers that a change from an accounting principle that is not generally accepted to a principle that is generally accepted is a correction of an error. The Bulletin is effective for annual financial statements covering the first fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006. The adoption of this Bulletin did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140.” This statement amends Statements No. 133 and 140 by: permitting fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument with an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation; clarifying which interest-only strips and principal-only strips are not subject to the requirements of Statement No. 133; establishing a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation; clarifying that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives; and amending Statement No. 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose entity from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial instrument. The statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. The adoption of this standard is not anticipated to have a material impact on financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140.” This statement amends Statement No. 140 with respect to the accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. It requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability each time an obligation is undertaken to service a financial asset by entering into a servicing contract in certain situations, and requires all separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities to be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. The statement permits the choice between the “amortization method” and the “fair value measurement method” for the subsequent measurement of the servicing assets or liabilities, and allows for a one-time reclassification of available-for-sale securities to trading securities at initial adoption. The statement also requires separate presentation of servicing assets and servicing liabilities subsequently measured at fair value in the statement of financial position, and additional disclosures for all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. The statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2006. The adoption of this standard is not anticipated to have a material impact on financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement 109,” which provides guidance on the measurement, recognition, and disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, and disclosure. FIN 48 prescribes that a tax position should only be recognized if it is more-likely-than-not that the position will be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authority. A tax position that meets this threshold is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is more likely than not (greater than 50 percent) realized upon ultimate settlement. The cumulative effect of applying FIN 48 is to be reported as an adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is assessing the impact, if any, that adoption may have on its financial statements.

51

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 2—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Concluded)

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. While the Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, it does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In addition, the Statement establishes a fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. Lastly, SFAS No. 157 requires additional disclosures for each interim and annual period separately for each major category of assets and liabilities. The Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Management does not expect the adoption of this Statement to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans. “This Statement requires an employer that is a business entity and sponsors one or more single-employer defined benefit plans to: recognize the funded status of a benefit plan—measured as the difference between plan assets at fair value (with limited exceptions) and the benefit obligation—in its statement of financial position; recognize as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost pursuant to other specified standards; measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end statement of financial position (with limited exceptions); and disclose in the notes to financial statements additional information about certain effects on net periodic benefit cost for the next fiscal year that arise from delayed recognition of the gains or losses, prior service costs or credits, and transition asset or obligation. An employer with publicly traded equity securities is required to initially recognize the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan and to provide the required disclosures as of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006. Management does not expect the adoption of this Statement to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”, which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value and also establishes fair presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is assessing the impact, if any, that adoption will have on its financial statements.

52

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 3—INVESTMENT SECURITIES

A summary of the amortized cost and estimated fair values of investment securities is as follows:

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value
December 31, 2006
Available-for-sale
Debt securities:
United States government and agency obligations	$	12,942,200	$	1,200	$	(204,300	)	$	12,739,100
Tax-exempt municipal bonds		6,414,400		21,200		(21,700	)		6,413,900
Corporate bonds		2,003,300		18,600		—			2,021,900
Mortgage-backed securities		1,262,600		—		(41,300	)		1,221,300
Adjustable Rate Mortgage Fund		—		—		—			—
Total debt securities		22,622,500		41,000		(267,300	)		22,396,200
Marketable equity securities:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation common stock		232,400		52,800		—			285,200
Citigroup preferred stock		1,032,900		—		(23,900	)		1,009,000
Consolidated Edison preferred stock		271,500		6,000		—			277,500
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation preferred stock		340,400		—		(7,900	)		332,500
HBSC preferred stock		126,500		3,100		—			129,600
Goldman Sachs preferred stock		125,800		4,800		—			130,600
Virginia Savings Bank Convertible PS		1,000,000		—		—			1,000,000
Other equity securities		2,039,300		375,200		(9,800	)		2,404,700
Total marketable equity securities		5,168,800		441,900		(41,600	)		5,569,100
		27,791,300		482,900		(308,900	)		27,965,300
Other investment securities:
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock		2,075,500		—		—			2,075,500
Federal Reserve Bank Stock		124,800		—		—			124,800
Community Bankers’ Bank		63,300		—		—			63,300
Banker’s Title of Hampton Roads		13,300		—		6,700			20,000
VBA Investment Services		145,800		—		(132,500	)		13,300
Maryland Financial Bank		20,000		—		125,800			145,800
		2,442,700		—		—			2,442,700
	$	30,234,000	$	482,900	$	(308,900	)	$	30,408,000

53

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 3—INVESTMENT SECURITIES (Continued)

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value
December 31, 2005
Available-for-sale
Debt securities:
United States government and agency obligations	$	17,545,800	$	13,400	$	(272,600	)	$	17,286,600
Tax-exempt municipal bonds		3,996,300		5,800		(14,000	)		3,988,100
Corporate bonds		2,007,700		52,300		—			2,060,000
Mortgage-backed securities		1,527,500		—		(36,000	)		1,491,500
Adjustable Rate Mortgage Fund		816,800		—		(19,500	)		797,300
Total debt securities		25,894,100		71,500		(342,100	)		25,623,500
Marketable equity securities:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation common stock		232,400		42,100		—			274,500
Citigroup preferred stock		1,032,900		10,500		(9,400	)		1,034,000
Consolidated Edison preferred stock		271,500		—		(1,600	)		269,900
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation preferred stock		340,400		—		(3,300	)		337,100
HBSC preferred stock		126,500		1,300		—			127,800
Goldman Sachs preferred stock		125,800		1,700		—			127,500
Other equity securities		1,758,300		356,700		(19,400	)		2,095,600
Total marketable equity securities		3,887,800		412,300		(33,700	)		4,266,400
		29,781,900		483,800		(375,800	)		29,889,900
Other investment securities:
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock		2,093,700		—		—			2,093,700
Federal Reserve Bank Stock		124,800		—		—			124,800
Community Bankers’ Bank		63,300		—		—			63,300
Banker’s Title of Hampton Roads		13,300		—		—			13,300
VBA Investment Services		145,800		—		—			145,800
Maryland Financial Bank		20,000		—		—			20,000
		2,460,900		—		—			2,460,900
	$	32,242,800	$	483,800	$	(375,800	)	$	32,350,800

54

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 3—INVESTMENT SECURITIES (Continued)

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities at December 31, 2006 by contractual maturity are shown below:

	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Available-for-sale
Due in one year or less	$	6,001,500	$	5,938,800
Due after one year through five years		8,803,300		8,660,400
Due after five years through ten years		4,931,900		4,930,800
Due after ten years		2,885,800		2,866,200
	$	22,622,500	$	22,396,200

At December 31, 2006 and 2005, investment securities with a carrying value of approximately $974,000 and $1.6 million, respectively, were pledged as collateral for public deposits.

For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, proceeds from the sales of securities available for sale amounted to $1.4 million, $1.5 million and $1.0 million, respectively. Gross realized gains amounted to $231,000, $189,000 and $182,000, respectively, while gross realized losses were $21,000, $23,000 and $34,000, respectively. The tax provision applicable to these net realized gains and losses amounted to $77,000, $56,000 and $50,000, respectively.

The following table summarizes the Company’s investments’ gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2006.

	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
Description of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
United States government and agency obligations	$	—	$	—		$	11,765,400	$	(204,300	)	$	11,765,400	$	(204,300	)
Tax-exempt municipal bonds		2,626,500		(14,400	)		1,003,100		(7,300	)		3,629,600		(21,700	)
Corporate bonds		—		—			—		—			—		—
Mortgage-backed securities		—		—			1,221,300		(41,300	)		1,221,300		(41,300	)
Adjustable Rate Mortgage Fund		—		—			—		—			—		—
Subtotal, debt securities		2,626,500		(14,400	)		13,989,800		(252,900	)		16,616,300		(267,300	)
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation common stock		—		—			—		—			—		—
Preferred stock		505,000		(3,600	)		836,500		(28,200	)		1,341,500		(31,800	)
Other equity securities		90,000		(4,100	)		70,400		(5,700	)		160,400		(9,800	)
Subtotal, equity securities		595,000		(7,700	)		906,900		(33,900	)		1,501,900		(41,600	)
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	3,221,500	$	(22,100	)	$	14,896,700	$	(286,800	)	$	18,118,200	$	(308,900	)

55

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 3—INVESTMENT SECURITIES (Concluded)

There are a total of thirty-three securities that have unrealized losses as of December 31, 2006: twelve United States government and agency securities, three United States agency MBS securities, eight municipal securities, three preferred stock securities, seven equity securities. The debt securities are obligations of entities that are excellent credit risks. The impairment as noted is the result of interest rate market conditions and does not reflect on the ability of the issuers to repay the debt obligations. The preferred stock category represents ownership in three reputable companies whose credit ratings remain strong as measured by Moody’s and S&P. The losses in the equity securities, including the FHLMC common stock, represent normal swings in the equity markets. The impairment is the result of interest rate market conditions and there is a high probability of full recovery of investment. The Company maintains the ability and intent to hold all securities for the foreseeable future.

Other investment securities are accounted for using the cost method and are not included in the evaluation of impairment. However, these investments were reviewed by management and no identified events or changes in circumstances were identified that may have a significant adverse effect on their fair value.

NOTE 4—LOANS RECEIVABLE

Loans receivable are summarized below:

	December 31,
	2006		2005
Real estate loans:
Coventional mortgage:
Secured by one-to-four family residences	$	80,245,200	$	71,721,300
Commercial mortgages		64,698,400		61,916,600
Land		31,645,000		25,524,400
Short-term construction		9,160,600		14,966,200
Home equity lines of credit		14,742,800		15,293,100
Consumer loans		3,380,800		2,559,000
Commercial loans:
Secured		5,348,200		6,154,000
Unsecured		4,333,500		3,435,500
Total loans		213,554,500		201,570,100
Less:
Loans in process		2,820,100		5,940,600
Deferred loan fees (costs), net		136,400		82,300
Allowance for loan losses		2,872,800		2,850,700
	$	207,725,200	$	192,696,500

56

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 4—LOANS RECEIVABLE (Concluded)

The allowance for loan losses is summarized below:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2006			2005		2004
Balance at beginning of period	$	2,850,700		$	2,404,500	$	2,002,500
Provision charged to expense		58,700			303,700		418,800
(Charge-offs) recoveries, net		(36,600	)		142,500		(16,800	)
Balance at end of the period	$	2,872,800		$	2,850,700	$	2,404,500

At December 31, 2006, the Bank identified $3,000 of loans as impaired as defined by generally accepted accounting principles. However, the Bank did not allocate a valuation allowance for this loan at December 31, 2006. At December 31, 2005, the Bank identified $314,000 of loans as impaired as defined by generally accepted accounting principles. Impaired loans at December 2005 had a valuation allowance allocation of $47,000. At December 31, 2004, no loans were identified by the Bank as impaired and, accordingly, no specific allowances were provided with respect to impaired loans. For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the average recorded investment in impaired loans was $155,000, $100,000 and $30,000, respectively, and interest income recognized on impaired loans, all on the cash basis, was approximately $5,000, $15,000 and $11,000, respectively. No additional funds are committed to be advanced in connection with impaired loans. At December 31, 2006, nonaccrual loans were $931,300 and no loans existed that are past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest.

NOTE 5—PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

Premises and equipment are summarized as follows:

	December 31,
	2006			2005
Land	$	739,500		$	739,500
Buildings		6,845,900			6,845,900
Furniture and fixtures		2,322,400			2,272,400
Computer equipment & software		904,800			897,000
Automobiles		145,200			89,100
Construction in process		59,300			6,100
		11,017,100			10,850,000
Less—accumulated depreciation		(3,972,800	)		(3,385,400	)
	$	7,044,300		$	7,464,600

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 amounted to $681,200, $666,400 and $511,300, respectively.

57

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 6—DEPOSITS

Deposits accounts are summarized below:

	December 31,
	2006		2005
Demand deposits:
Noninterest-bearing	$	25,554,500	$	28,864,700
Interest-bearing:
Savings accounts		19,155,500		21,960,200
Checking accounts		24,561,300		27,343,500
Money market deposit accounts		17,108,700		25,714,900
Total interest-bearing		60,825,500		75,018,600
Total demand deposits		86,380,000		103,883,300
Time deposits		111,722,800		85,086,400
	$	198,102,800	$	188,969,700

The aggregate amount of certificates of deposit with a minimum denomination of $100,000 was approximately $28.6 million and $19.2 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Time deposits outstanding at December 31, 2006 mature as follows:

Within one year	$	78,464,200
One to two years		16,136,300
Two to three years		5,068,000
Three to four years		8,458,000
Four to five years		2,706,000
Thereafter		890,300
	$	111,722,800

58

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 7—FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The estimated fair values of the Bank’s financial instruments as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:

	Carrying Amount		Fair Value
	(in thousands)
December 31, 2006
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,470	$	9,470
Securities	$	30,408	$	30,408
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses	$	207,725	$	208,046
Accrued interest receivable	$	1,140	$	1,140
Financial liabilities
Deposits	$	198,103	$	197,590
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank	$	35,233	$	35,078
Accrued interest payable	$	594	$	594
Unrecognized financial instruments
Commitments to extend credit		N/A		N/A
December 31, 2005
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,176	$	9,176
Securities	$	32,351	$	32,351
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses	$	192,697	$	194,924
Accrued interest receivable	$	1,008	$	1,008
Financial liabilities
Deposits	$	188,970	$	188,842
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank	$	34,050	$	34,460
Accrued interest payable	$	181	$	181
Unrecognized financial instruments
Commitments to extend credit		N/A		N/A

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value.

Cash and cash equivalents

For cash and cash equivalents, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Securities

Fair values are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities. For restricted securities without readily determinable values, the carrying amount is considered a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Loan receivables

The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting future cash flows, using market rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar remaining maturities. This calculation ignores loan fees and

59

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 7—FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Concluded)

certain factors affecting the interest rates charged on various loans, such as the borrower’s creditworthiness and compensating balances, and dissimilar types of real estate held as collateral.

Deposit liabilities

The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts, and certain money market deposits is the amount payable on demand at the balance sheet date. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated by discounting remaining maturities amounts using market rates for similar replacement funding sources.

Accrued interest receivable and payable

The carrying amounts of accrued interest receivable and payable approximate their fair values.

Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank

The carrying value of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank due within ninety days from the balance sheet date approximates fair value. For those borrowings that mature beyond ninety days, the fair value of the borrowing is estimated by discounting future cash flows, using the current rates at which similar borrowings would be obtained from the Federal Home Loan Bank with similar remaining maturities.

Commitments to extend credit

The fair value of commitments is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the borrowers. For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. Because of the competitive nature of the marketplace, loan fees vary greatly with no fees charged in many cases. Therefore, management has concluded no value should be assigned.

NOTE 8—ADVANCES FROM FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK

Borrowings (“advances”) from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) are scheduled to mature as follows:

	December 31,
	2006		2005
Within one year	$	24,750,000	$	27,500,000
One to two years		3,000,000		2,000,000
More than two years		7,483,300		4,550,000
	$	35,233,300	$	34,050,000

Information regarding FHLB advances is summarized below:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2006		2005
Monthly average balance of borrowings outstanding	$	33,667,800	$	28,601,000
Maximum month-end balance of borrowings outstanding	$	42,683,300	$	37,066,700

60

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 8—ADVANCES FROM FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK (Concluded)

The weighted average interest rate on advances was 4.92%, 3.59% and 1.97% for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. These advances are collateralized by the Bank’s investment in FHLB stock, qualifying real estate loans with a principal balance of approximately $94.5 million, and government agency and mortgage-backed securities with a fair market value of approximately $8.4 million held under a specific collateral agreement. The Bank has an available line of credit with the FHLB for up to 25% of Bank assets, or approximately $64.4 million at December 31, 2006. However, the Bank may request an increase in this borrowing capacity from the FHLB. At December 31, 2006 the Bank had sufficient collateral pledged to borrow a total of approximately $77.6 million from the FHLB. The borrowing capacity is subject to certain collateral requirements as stipulated in the FHLB borrowing agreement.

NOTE 9—OTHER NONINTEREST INCOME AND EXPENSE

Other noninterest income and expense consists of the following:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2006		2005		2004
Other noninterest income
Credit life commissions	$	1,300	$	2,100	$	9,700
Income from real estate held for investment		24,100		31,600		41,400
Safe deposit box rental		20,700		21,200		21,600
Increase in BOLI cash surrender value		147,100		134,700		135,500
Gain on disposal of fixed assets		300		—		1,400
Miscellaneous fees and commissions		75,100		67,300		69,100
	$	268,600	$	256,900	$	278,700
Other noninterest expense
Education and seminars	$	65,900	$	39,200	$	30,100
Personnel costs		93,300		77,700		55,800
Travel		46,900		34,300		23,400
Courier cost		27,000		26,700		27,900
Supervisory fees		48,000		30,400		40,800
Loan costs		43,000		48,300		51,500
ATM/VISA check card fees		106,200		95,700		79,400
Internet banking fees		180,400		154,700		105,600
Insurance		41,500		36,200		36,500
Bank service charges		72,300		70,900		69,100
Deposit account write-offs		7,700		26,300		79,000
REO property expense		—		—		2,400
Loss on disposal of fixed assets		—		6,500		—
Miscellaneous		34,900		39,900		35,500
	$	767,100	$	686,800	$	637,000

61

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 10—INCOME TAXES

The provision for income taxes (benefit) is summarized below:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2006			2005			2004
Current
Federal	$	1,413,300		$	1,378,300		$	960,900
State		—			2,000			11,700
		1,413,300			1,380,300			972,600
Deferred
Federal		(257,400	)		(187,500	)		38,100
State		—			—			—
		(257,400	)		(187,500	)		38,100
Total
Federal		1,155,900			1,190,800			999,000
State		—			2,000			11,700
	$	1,155,900		$	1,192,800		$	1,010,700

	December 31,
	2006		2005
Deferred tax asset
Bad debts and other provisions	$	976,000	$	960,000
Unrealized loss on securities available for sale		—		—
Other		98,300		2,900
Total deferred tax asset		1,074,300		962,900
Deferred tax liability
FHLB stock		70,000		70,000
Depreciation		285,000		431,000
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale		59,000		36,000
Other		—		—
Total deferred tax liability		414,000		537,000
Net deferred tax asset	$	660,300	$	425,900

The differences between expected federal and state income tax expense at statutory rates to actual income tax expense are summarized as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2006			2005			2004
Federal income tax expense—at statutory rate	$	1,390,000		$	1,315,000		$	1,144,000
Tax effect of:
Tax exempt interest income		(53,000	)		(50,000	)		(57,000	)
BOLI cash surrender value increase		(50,000	)		(46,000	)		(46,000	)
Dividends received deduction		(58,000	)		(42,000	)		(38,000	)
Other, net		(73,100	)		15,800			7,700
	$	1,155,900		$	1,192,800		$	1,010,700

62

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 11—STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

The Company is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and its banking subsidiary must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and its banking subsidiary to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier I capital to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2006, that the Company and the Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

As of December 31, 2006, the most recent notification from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s category. The Company and the Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios are presented in the table.

	Actual				For Capital Adequacy Purposes				To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
	(Dollars in Thousands)
As of December 31, 2006:
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):
Consolidated	$	28,060	15.09	%	$	14,879	8.00	%	$	N/A	N/A
Shore Bank		23,471	12.97	%		14,473	8.00	%		18,091	10.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):
Consolidated	$	25,611	13.77	%	$	7,440	4.00	%	$	N/A	N/A
Shore Bank		21,180	11.71	%		7,236	4.00	%		10,855	6.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets):
Consolidated	$	25,611	9.93	%	$	10,319	4.00	%	$	N/A	N/A
Shore Bank		21,180	8.27	%		10,247	4.00	%		12,809	5.00	%
As of December 31, 2005:
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):
Consolidated	$	25,433	14.53	%	$	13,999	8.00	%	$	N/A	N/A
Shore Bank		21,500	12.54	%		13,720	8.00	%		17,150	10.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):
Consolidated	$	23,120	13.21	%	$	6,999	4.00	%	$	N/A	N/A
Shore Bank		19,345	11.28	%		6,860	4.00	%		10,290	6.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets):
Consolidated	$	23,120	9.44	%	$	9,799	4.00	%	$	N/A	N/A
Shore Bank		19,345	7.97	%		9,708	4.00	%		12,135	5.00	%

63

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 11—STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Concluded)

Federal and state banking regulations place certain restrictions on dividends paid and loans or advances made by the Bank to the Company. The total amount of dividends that may be paid at any date is generally limited to the retained earnings (as defined) for the Bank for the current and past two years, and loans or advances are limited to 10 percent of the Bank’s capital stock and surplus on a secured basis. In addition, dividends paid by the Bank to the Company would be prohibited if the effect thereof would cause the Bank’s capital to be reduced below applicable minimum capital requirements.

At December 31, 2006, the Bank’s retained earnings available for the payment of dividends was $3.3 million. Accordingly, $18.2 million of the Company’s equity in the net assets of the Bank was restricted at December 31, 2006.

During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company paid quarterly cash dividends of $0.058 per share for the first, second and third quarters and $0.07 per share for the fourth quarter. During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company paid quarterly cash dividends of $0.05 per share for the first and second quarters and $0.058 per share for the third and fourth quarters. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company paid quarterly cash dividends of $0.042 per share for the first and second quarters and $0.05 per share for the third and fourth quarters. During August 2006, the Company effected a six-for-five stock split. All 2004, 2005 and 2006 dividends per share have been adjusted to reflect the August 2006 stock split. On January 9, 2007, the Company declared a $0.07 per share quarterly cash dividend paid on February 1, 2007 to shareholders of record on January 24, 2007.

During October 2001, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a Dividend Reinvestment Plan (“DRIP Plan”) whereby shareholders may elect to have cash dividends paid by the Company reinvested in its common stock, subject to certain limitations. Shareholders may also make optional cash payments to purchase additional shares of the Company’s common stock. The DRIP Plan document details the plan and was sent to each shareholder during November 2001.

NOTE 12—EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

401k Profit Sharing Plan

The Company’s 401k Profit Sharing Plan Trust (the “Plan”) provides for retirement, death and disability benefits. An employee becomes eligible for participation in the Plan on the first day of the month following their ninety day anniversary date with the Company. However, an employee must be employed on the last day of the year to be eligible for profit sharing under the Plan.

Employees may elect to defer 2%-15% of their compensation, with the Company making matching contributions equal to 100% of the first 3% of compensation deferred, and 50% of the next 3%. Matching contributions made by the Company under the Plan totaled approximately $107,900, $87,600 and $66,300 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The Company may also elect to make discretionary contributions to the Plan. Accordingly, $120,000, $106,000 and $96,000 of such contributions were made during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Stock Option Plans

The Company currently has one stock option plan for employees in effect—the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2001 Plan”). The 1992 Stock Option Plan expired, but certain options deemed earned are still exercisable.

64

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 12—EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)

The Company’s 2001 Plan is designed to attract and retain qualified personnel in key positions, provide employees with a proprietary interest in the Company as an incentive to contribute to the success of the Company and the Bank and reward employees for outstanding performance and the attainment of targeted goals. The 2001 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options intended to comply with the requirements of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (“incentive stock options”), as well as nonqualified stock options.

The 2001 Plan, approved by the Company’s shareholders on April 17, 2001, provides up to 388,800 shares of common stock (as adjusted for the December 2003 20% stock dividend and August 2006 six-for-five stock split) for granting restricted stock awards and stock options in the form of incentive stock options and nonstatutory stock options to employees of the Company. The 2001 Plan also provides for the granting of restricted stock awards. The 2001 Plan expires on April 16, 2011.

The 2001 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee formed by the Company’s Board of Directors, each member of which is a “nonemployee director” as defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The 2001 Plan is in effect for a period of ten years from the date of adoption by the Board of Directors.

Under the 2001 Plan, the committee determines which employees will be granted options, whether such options will be incentive or nonqualified options, the number of shares subject to each option, whether such options may be exercised by delivering other shares of common stock and when such options become exercisable. In general, the per share exercise price of an incentive stock option shall be at least equal to the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date the option is granted. The per share exercise price of a nonqualified stock option shall be not less than 50% of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date the option is granted.

Stock options shall become vested and exercisable in the manner specified by the committee. In general, each stock option or portion thereof shall be exercisable at any time on or after it vests and is exercisable for periods of up to 10 years after its date of grant. Stock options are nontransferable except by will or the laws of descent and distribution.

The committee also determines which employees will be awarded restricted stock and the number of shares to be awarded. The value of the restricted stock is to be at least equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date the stock is granted. No shares of restricted stock have been awarded.

During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company did not grant incentive stock options under the 2001 Plan. During the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company granted 30,554 and 18,206 incentive stock options under the 2001 Plan at an average exercise price of $15.58 and $13.50, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company granted 10,330, 10,560 and 10,020 nonqualified stock options under the 2001 plan at an average exercise price of $14.86, $16.40 and $13.50, respectively.

65

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 12—EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)

The following table represents options outstanding under the Stock Plans:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2006							2005				2004
	Options		Weighted- Average Exercise Price			Aggregate Intrinsic Value		Options		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Options		Weighted- Average Exercise Price
Outstanding—beginning of year	136,057		$	10.85				111,479		$	8.43	86,408		$	6.53
Granted	10,380			14.86				41,114			15.79	28,226			13.50
Exercised	(8,328	)		(6.74	)			(14,898	)		6.22	(1,872	)		7.49
Forfeited	(620	)		15.19				(1,638	)		12.61	(1,284	)		11.11
Outstanding—end of year	137,489		$	11.25		$	475,300	136,057		$	10.85	111,479		$	8.43
Exercisable—end of year	136,529		$	11.25		$	477,500	134,857		$	10.84	111,479		$	8.43
Weighted average fair value of options granted			$	3.89						$	4.30			$	3.23

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $66,100, $100,800 and $11,600, respectively.

Nonvested Shares	Number of Options		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2006	1,200		$	4.30
Granted	10,380			3.89
Vested	(10,620	)		3.90
Forfeited	—			—
Nonvested at December 31, 2006	960		$	4.30

As of December 31, 2006, there was $6,365 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period 3.17 years. The total fair value of shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $40,900, $172,500 and $91,200 respectively.

Total compensation cost of share-based payment arrangements recognized in income during 2006 was $40,400. The total income tax benefit recognized in the income statement for share-based compensation arrangements was $13,700 for 2006.

Cash received from option exercises under share-based payment arrangements for 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $56,200, $47,000 and $14,000, respectively. Tax deductions from option exercises of share-based arrangements received during 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $10,900, $9,300 and $3,900, respectively. During 2004 and 2006, no outstanding shares were exchanged towards the exercise of stock options, while 1,492 outstanding shares were exchanged towards the exercise of stock options during 2005.

66

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 12—EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Concluded)

Other information pertaining to options outstanding at December 31, 2006 is as follows:

	Options Outstanding				Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices	Number Outstanding	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number Exercisable	Weighted Average Exercise Price
$  5.01 – $  8.90	61,209	4.71	$	7.01	61,209	$	7.01
$13.50 – $16.40	76,280	6.18	$	14.88	76,040	$	14.84
Outstanding at end of year	137,489				137,249

NOTE 13—RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In the normal course of business, the Bank makes loans to and receives deposits from directors, officers and other related parties. Loans to employees are made on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other borrowers, except that the interest rate is reduced by a stated amount for primary residence loans, as long as such person remains employed by the Bank. At December 31, 2006, total deposit balances outstanding of related parties were $1.4 million. A summary of related party loan activity for the periods indicated is as follows:

Balance, December 31, 2005	$	2,945,000
Originations		2,104,300
Repayments		(599,900	)
Balance, December 31, 2006	$	4,449,400

The Bank has a lease agreement with the Bank’s former Chairman of the Board of Directors to lease a lot at Four Corners Plaza, Onley, Virginia, for $2,000 per month expiring in 2009 with two five-year renewals. Each renewal will be at the option of the Bank and the leases will be based on the previous lease rate, after being adjusted for changes in the consumer price index. Shore Investments Inc. has a lease agreement with a partnership whereby the Company’s Chairman of the Board is the majority partner. The lease is for property located in Accomac, Virginia at $1,000 per month expiring in 2010 with two five-year renewal options available if the Bank chooses to exercise them. The Bank has a lease agreement with a director for two billboard signs at $400 per month each that expires in August 2007.

All related party transactions were consummated in terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm’s length transactions.

NOTE 14—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES AND OTHER RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Minimum future lease payments for these operating leases are as follows:

Years Ending December 31,
2007	$	76,000
2008		62,700
2009		22,000
2010		6,000
2011		—
	$	166,700

67

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 14—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES AND OTHER RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Concluded)

Rental expense under operating leases was $49,400, $30,600 and $47,600 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

The Company is a party to credit related financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit. Such commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s exposure to credit loss is represented by the contractual amount of these commitments. The Company follows the same credit policies in making commitments as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The Bank evaluates each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Bank upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counter party. Collateral held varies but may include single-family residences, other residential property, commercial property and land. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Bank had outstanding commitments to originate loans, including outstanding construction loan commitments, with variable interest rates of approximately $8.4 million and $15.5 million, respectively. In addition, unused lines of credit, primarily at variable rates, amounted to approximately $36.2 million and $31.3 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Standby letters of credit at December 31, 2006 and 2005 were $984,000 and $1.3 million, respectively. The distribution of commitments to extend credit approximates the distribution of loans outstanding.

In the normal course of business, the Bank has entered into employment agreements with some of its key executives. The Company may terminate the employment agreements with proper notice as specified in the agreements. Termination without cause (as defined in the agreement) entitles the executive to base salary and benefits for a specified period of time from the date of termination, depending on the agreement.

The Bank has an agreement with a service company whereby the latter furnishes data processing services to the Bank. The contract was last renewed during 2005 for an additional 60 months that is similar to the previous agreement and to those entered into by other entities in the financial institution industry. The costs represent normal operating costs to the Bank.

Shore Investments Inc. had an agreement with a registered broker-dealer to sell investment products. However, this agreement was terminated during 2003 and a new agreement was entered into with another registered broker-dealer. The terms of the new agreement are similar to those under the prior agreement. The agreement has no expiration date, but can be terminated by either party with ninety days notice.

Various legal claims also arise from time to time in the normal course of business that, in the opinion of management, will have no material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

68

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 15—EARNINGS PER SHARE RECONCILIATION

The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations.

	Years Ended December 31,
	2006		2005		2004
Net income (numerator, basic and diluted)	$	2,933,100	$	2,675,300	$	2,352,800
Weighted average shares outstanding (denominator)		2,492,100		2,485,100		2,474,900
Earnings per common share—basic	$	1.18	$	1.08	$	0.95
Effect of dilutive securities:
Weighted average shares outstanding		2,492,100		2,485,100		2,474,900
Effect of stock options		30,500		36,200		40,600
Diluted average shares outstanding (denominator)		2,522,600		2,521,300		2,515,500
Earnings per common share—assuming dilution	$	1.16	$	1.06	$	0.94

NOTE 16—PARENT COMPANY

Since its inception, the Company’s business activities have been limited to investment activities related to the Bank and its excess cash. Dividends and management fees from the Bank and investment income represent the only sources of funds for the Company. Certain restrictions exist that limit the amount of dividends the Bank may declare without obtaining regulatory approval. At December 31, 2006, the Bank had approximately $3.3 million available to declare in dividends under existing regulatory guidelines.

The Company’s primary costs consist of its employees’ compensation expense, board of director’s expenses, public reporting requirements and annual fees associated with being a public company. During the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Bank paid the Company management fees of $480,000, $431,000 and $410,000, respectively, for its proportion of operating costs.

The Company’s condensed balance sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related condensed statements of income and cash flows for years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 are provided below:

Condensed Balance Sheets

	December 31,
	2006		2005
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	682,000	$	320,000
Securities available-for-sale		5,224,000		3,943,000
Investment in Shore Bank		21,464,500		19,647,000
Other assets		169,500		140,000
Total assets	$	27,540,000	$	24,050,000
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities	$	1,414,000	$	421,000
Stockholders’ equity		26,126,000		23,629,000
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	27,540,000	$	24,050,000

69

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 16—PARENT COMPANY (Continued)

Condensed Statements of Income

	Years Ended December 31,
	2006		2005		2004
Income
Dividends from Shore Bank	$	1,000,000	$	500,000	$	—
Management Fees from Shore Bank		480,000		431,000		410,000
Investment income		239,000		171,000		162,000
Gain on sales of securities		246,000		185,000		149,000
Total income		1,965,000		1,287,000		721,000
Expenses
Compensation and benefits		441,000		412,000		418,000
Directors’ fees		81,000		93,000		77,000
Accounting and professional fees		147,000		97,000		75,000
Other		137,000		73,000		72,000
Total expenses		806,000		675,000		642,000
Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed net income of subsidiary		1,159,000		612,000		79,000
Income tax expense		—		—		—
Income before equity in undistributed net income of subsidiary		1,159,000		612,000		79,000
Equity in undistributed net income of subsidiary (1)		1,774,000		2,063,000		2,274,000
Net income	$	2,933,000	$	2,675,000	$	2,353,000

(1) Amount in parentheses represents the excess of dividends declared over net income of subsidiary.

70

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 16—PARENT COMPANY (Concluded)

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

	Years Ended December 31,
	2006			2005			2004
Operating Activities
Net income	$	2,933,000		$	2,675,000		$	2,353,000
Equity in undistributed net income of subsidiary		(1,774,000	)		(2,063,000	)		(2,274,000	)
Other non-cash transactions		14,200			—			10,000
Gain on sale of securities		(246,000	)		(185,000	)		(149,000	)
Tax benefit from stock options		11,000			9,000			21,000
Compensation expense for stock options granted		40,000			—			—
Change in other assets		(29,800	)		(9,000	)		7,000
Change in other liabilities		18,000			9,000			(13,000	)
Cash flows from operating activities		966,400			436,000			(45,000	)
Investing Activities
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities		593,000			855,000			885,000
Purchase of available-for-sale securities		(1,643,000	)		(877,000	)		(598,000	)
Sale of premises and equipment		—			—			266,000
Other investing activities		—			—			—
Cash flows from investing activities		(1,050,000	)		(22,000	)		553,000
Financing Activities
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options		56,000			72,000			14,000
Proceeds from borrowings		1,000,000			—			—
Payment of dividends on common stock		(610,400	)		(538,000	)		(454,000	)
Cash flows from financing activities		445,600			(466,000	)		(440,000	)
Change in cash and cash equivalents		362,000			(52,000	)		68,000
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		320,000			372,000			304,000
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	682,000		$	320,000		$	372,000

71

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 17—QUARTERLY CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME—UNAUDITED

Quarterly Condensed Statements of Income—Unaudited

	2006 Quarters Ended
	March 31		June 30		September 30		December 31
Total interest and dividend income	$	3,495,800	$	3,774,500	$	3,852,100	$	3,990,100
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		2,102,500		2,093,900		2,045,400		2,194,500
Noninterest income		795,400		842,200		838,500		915,800
Noninterest expense		1,890,700		1,869,100		1,911,600		2,067,800
Income before income taxes		1,007,200		1,067,000		972,300		1,042,500
Net income		695,000		736,200		670,900		831,000
Earnings per common share—diluted		0.27		0.29		0.27		0.33
Dividends per common share		0.058		0.058		0.058		0.070
	2005 Quarters Ended
	March 31		June 30		September 30		December 31
Total interest and dividend income	$	3,022,900	$	3,115,200	$	3,311,400	$	3,401,000
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		1,994,900		1,964,700		2,058,900		2,114,300
Noninterest income		522,200		563,900		672,600		620,700
Noninterest expense		1,600,500		1,639,100		1,716,900		1,687,600
Income before income taxes		916,600		889,500		1,014,600		1,047,400
Net income		631,100		613,700		700,100		730,400
Earnings per common share—diluted		0.25		0.24		0.28		0.29
Dividends per common share		0.050		0.050		0.058		0.070

NOTE 18—SEGMENT INFORMATION

Management determines the Company’s operating segments and evaluates their performance by the markets in which the Bank operates. Currently, the Bank operates in two different geographical markets: Virginia and Maryland. Generally, each market possesses a different customer base and occasionally requires that management approach product pricing and promotion in different manners. However, products offered in each market are similar. Additionally, the Maryland market represents a newer market to the Bank than does the Virginia market.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The Company evaluates performance based on net interest income from operations and asset growth within the segments.

72

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

NOTE 18—SEGMENT INFORMATION (Concluded)

Since the Company derives a significant portion of its revenues from interest income and interest expense is the most significant expense, the segments are reported below using net interest income for the periods indicated. The “Other” column primarily represents the Company’s investment activities resulting from excess cash available within the individual segments. The “Elimination” column represents intersegment activities and reconciles the segments to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

	Virginia		Maryland		Other			Elimination of Intersegment Transactions			Total
	(In thousands)
Net Interest Income:
Year ended December 31, 2006	$	6,400	$	1,752	$	(377	)	$	720		$	8,495
Year ended December 31, 2005	$	6,174	$	1,690	$	590		$	(18	)	$	8,437
Year ended December 31, 2004	$	5,254	$	1,323	$	1,297		$	(452	)	$	7,422
Assets:
December 31, 2006	$	198,692	$	49,441	$	43,531		$	(30,988	)	$	260,676
December 31, 2005	$	186,922	$	46,145	$	45,042		$	(30,690	)	$	247,419

NOTE 19—BRANCH DEPOSIT ACQUISITION

On December 13, 2002, the Bank acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of the Salisbury, Maryland branch of Susquehanna Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Susquehanna Bankshares Inc. The approximate fair value of the net assets acquired and deposit liabilities assumed amounted to $50,000 and $17.5 million, respectively. The Bank realized proceeds of approximately $16.8 million from the transaction, net of a deposit premium intangible of $620,000. The Bank is amortizing this intangible over ten years. During the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Bank realized amortization expense of $62,000, $62,000 and $62,000 respectively, on this asset and the accumulated amortization for the periods then ended was $248,000, $186,000 and $124,000, respectively.

NOTE 20—COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Total comprehensive income consists of the following for the years indicated:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2006		2005			2004
Net income	$	2,933,100	$	2,675,300		$	2,352,800
Other comprehensive income (loss)		68,200		(539,400	)		(176,200	)
Total comprehensive income	$	3,001,300	$	2,135,900		$	2,176,600

The components of other comprehensive income are as follows for the years indicated:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2006			2005			2004
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period	$	316,000		$	(674,600	)	$	(127,900	)
Less: reclassification adjustment for gain included in income		(210,000	)		(166,400	)		(148,100	)
Total other comprehensive gain (loss) before tax effect		106,000			(841,000	)		(276,000	)
Tax benefit (expense)		(37,800	)		301,600			99,800
Net unrealized gain (loss)	$	68,200		$	(539,400	)	$	(176,200	)

73

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders

Shore Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Shore Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Shore Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Norfolk, Virginia

March 13, 2007

74

Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the year. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that these controls and procedures are effective. There were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.

Disclosure controls and procedures are our controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

75

PART III

Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERANCE

The following provides information on the only executive officer of the Company who is not a director of the Company and is not included in the Proxy Statement:

Name	Age	Position
Steven M. Belote	41	Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company; Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Bank

Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Other than as specified above, and pursuant to General Instructions E(3), the information called for by Part III, Items 10. through 14., are incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 17, 2007, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of December 31, 2006.

76

PART IV

Item 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

The following documents are filed as part of this report:

(a)(1) Financial Statements

The following consolidated financial statements and reports of independent auditors of the Company are in Part II, Item 8 on pages 44 thru 87:

Consolidated Balance Sheets—December 31, 2006 and 2005

Consolidated Statements of Income—Years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity—Years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules

All schedules are omitted since they are not required, are not applicable, or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

(a)(3) The following exhibits are filed as part of this Form 10-K and this list includes the Exhibit Index.

No.	Description
3.1	Articles of Incorporation of Registrant, as amended.*****
3.2	Bylaws of Registrant.*
10.1	Company’s 1992 Incentive Stock Option Plan.*
10.2	Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and Scott C. Harvard.***
10.3	Management Continuity Agreement between the Company and Scott C. Harvard.***
10.4	Company’s 2001 Stock Incentive Plan.****
10.5	Form of Employment Agreement between the Company and each of J. Anderson Duer, Jr. and Steven M. Belote.
11.0	Earnings Per Share Computation.**
13.0	2006 Annual Report to Shareholders (filed herewith).
21.0	Subsidiaries of the Registrant—Reference is made to “Item 1. Business” or the required information.
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

* Incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-35389) filed by the Company with the Commission on September 15, 1997.

77

** Information required herein is incorporated by reference from Note 15 on page 58 of the financial statements attached hereto to this Form 10-K.

*** Incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2001.

**** Incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-82838) filed by the Company with the Commission on February 15, 2002.

***** Incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company with the Commission on September 6, 2006.

78

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
	By:	/s/    SCOTT C. HARVARD
		Scott C. Harvard
		President and Chief Executive Officer
	Dated: March 20, 2007

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Capacity	Date
/s/    HENRY P. CUSTIS, JR.         Henry P Custis, Jr.	Chairman of the Board and Director	March 20, 2007
/s/    SCOTT C. HARVARD         Scott C. Harvard	President (Principal Executive Officer) and Director	March 20, 2007
/s/    STEVEN M. BELOTE         Steven M. Belote	Vice President (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)	March 20, 2007
/s/    TERRELL E. BOOTHE         Terrell E. Boothe	Director	March 20, 2007
/s/    D. PAGE ELMORE D. Page Elmore	Director	March 20, 2007
/s/    RICHARD F. HALL, III         Richard F. Hall, III	Director	March 20, 2007
/s/    LLOYD J. KELLAM, III         Lloyd J. Kellam, III	Director	March 20, 2007
/s/    L. DIXON LEATHERBURY         L. Dixon Leatherbury	Director	March 20, 2007

79

EX-13.0

Dear Stockholders;

It is with great pleasure that I report to you that your company posted its fifth consecutive year of record profits and eighth consecutive year of increased dividends paid to our stockholders. Income for 2006 reached $2.9 million or $1.16 per share on a fully diluted basis. Total assets grew to $260 million with total gross loans at year end of $210 million.

Your banking company saw two developments during the year that will impact performance over the next twenty four months. The first was a marked increase in non interest income. Shore Bank benefited from a 95% increase in revenues generated by its investment subsidiary, stable fee income generated by its mortgage brokerage operation, and significant growth in deposit fee income. Non interest income sources are typically stable core earnings and the bank intends to continue to focus on growth in these areas. The second development during the year was a declining net interest margin which drives net interest income. This decline is being driven by the movement of money from low yielding transaction accounts to higher yielding short term money market and certificate of deposit accounts. It is being exacerbated by long term interest rates being lower than short term rates, effectively keeping a lid on the return available on many types of loans. Both of these trends will impact earnings in the future and are receiving the management team’s full attention.

Loan quality remained at remarkably contained levels with non current loans to total loans at 0.89% at year end. The company had no foreclosures that resulted in losses or in real estate owned by the bank. The loan loss reserve account stood at 1.36% of total loans outstanding at year end or 303% of non performing loans.

During the last year your banking company reviewed strategic opportunities for the future. As the company grows its assets and expands in new markets the need for depth of management and operational support becomes much greater. In an effort to strengthen the team the bank added two experienced commercial bankers in the operations and lending areas. The company also determined that the internet banking platform would be a line of business on which future growth would depend. For the first time in our history electronic transactions exceeded paper check transactions during 2006. Electronic banking in all of its forms is now the expectation of banking customers. At Shore Bank we have committed human and financial resources to delivering an excellent e-banking product complimented by the largest ATM network in our markets and convenient branch banking for the personal touch.

Finally, we were pleased to announce a 6 for 5 stock split in September which increased the number of shares outstanding by twenty percent to 2.7 million total shares.

Thank you for your support in the past and for your continued support in 2007. We are committed to the long term growth of your investment.

Scott C. Harvard

President and Chief Executive Officer

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

	Years Ended December 31,
	2006			2005			2004			2003			2002
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Income Statement Data:
Interest income	$	15,113		$	12,851		$	10,697		$	9,501		$	9,406
Interest expense		6,618			4,414			3,275			3,275			3,716
Net interest income		8,495			8,437			7,422			6,226			5,690
Provision for loan losses		59			304			419			380			335
Noninterest income		3,392			2,379			1,920			1,889			1,375
Noninterest expense		7,739			6,644			5,559			4,780			4,156
Income taxes		1,156			1,193			1,011			893			802
Net income	$	2,933		$	2,675		$	2,353		$	2,062		$	1,772
Per Share Data:
Net income—basic (1)	$	1.18		$	1.08		$	0.95		$	0.84		$	0.73
Net income—dilutive (1)		1.16			1.06			0.93			0.83			0.72
Cash dividends (1)		0.25			0.22			0.18			0.14			0.10
Book value at period end		10.46			11.39			10.64			9.80			10.73
Tangible book value at period end		10.30			11.17			10.39			9.51			10.35
Average shares outstanding (000’s) (1)		2,492			2,485			2,474			2,444			2,441
Balance Sheet Data (period end):
Assets	$	260,676		$	247,419		$	237,689		$	196,550		$	179,993
Loans, net of unearned income and allowance		207,725			192,697			175,995			140,207			116,810
Securities		30,408			32,351			38,972			40,611			47,183
Deposits		198,103			188,970			192,737			158,891			158,989
Stockholders’ equity		26,126			23,629			21,959			20,201			18,218
Performance Ratios:
Return on average assets		1.14	%		1.10	%		1.08	%		1.11	%		1.12	%
Return on average equity		11.76	%		11.74	%		11.01	%		10.64	%		10.31	%
Net interest margin		3.57	%		3.75	%		3.72	%		3.63	%		3.82	%
Efficiency (2)		63.99	%		63.54	%		59.47	%		59.70	%		59.01	%
Asset Quality Ratios:
Allowance for loan losses to period end loans		1.36	%		1.49	%		1.35	%		1.41	%		1.35	%
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans		308.59	%		267.95	%		253.05	%		362.68	%		182.37	%
Nonperforming assets to period end loans and foreclosed properties		0.44	%		0.56	%		0.53	%		0.39	%		0.74	%
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans		0.02	%		(0.08	)%		0.01	%		(0.01	)%		0.05	%
Capital and Liquidity Ratios:
Leverage (3)		10.02	%		9.55	%		9.24	%		10.28	%		10.12	%
Risk-based:
Tier 1 capital		13.77	%		13.21	%		12.74	%		14.37	%		15.02	%
Total capital		15.09	%		14.53	%		14.14	%		15.74	%		16.24	%
Average loans to average deposits		104.48	%		96.93	%		87.60	%		79.78	%		80.56	%

(1) Earnings per share, dividends per share and average share data adjusted to reflect 20% stock dividend paid by the Company during December 2003 and the six-for-five stock split effected during August 2006.

(2) Computed by dividing noninterest expense, net of nonrecurring expenses, by the sum of net interest income and noninterest income, net of security gains and losses.

(3) Computed as a percentage of stockholders’ equity to period end assets.

Directors and Officers

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Henry P. Custis, Jr., Chairman

Law firm of Custis, Lewis & Dix, L.L.P.

Terrell E. Boothe

Retired

The Honorable D. Page Elmore

Maryland House of Delegates

Scott C. Harvard

President & Chief Executive Officer

Shore Financial Corporation and Shore Bank

Richard F. Hall, III

Loblolly Farms Seaside Produce

Dr. Lloyd J. Kellam, III

Eastern Shore Physicians and Surgeons

L. Dixon Leatherbury

Leatherbury Equipment Company

Wakefield Equipment Company

OFFICERS

Scott C. Harvard

President & Chief Executive Officer

Steven M. Belote

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

Lynn M. Badger

Assistant Vice President

Vonda M. Smith

Assistant Secretary

SHORE BANK

OFFICERS

Scott C. Harvard

President & Chief Executive Officer

Steven M. Belote

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

J. Anderson Duer, Jr.

Senior Vice President—Lending

Brenda L. Payne

Senior Vice President—Operations

Craig H. McConnell

President, Maryland Division

Vonda M. Smith

Corporate Secretary

Julie M. Badger

Vice President

Natalie N. Binder

Vice President

Robert J. Bloxom

Vice President

Christine R. Bouton

Vice President

Dennis J. Hebert

Vice President

Lisa M. Lentz

Vice President

Tammy V. Mason

Vice President

J. Scott Schreiber

Vice President

Donna E. Weaver

Vice President

Jacqueline L. Carpenter

Assistant Vice President

William H. Deckert, III

Assistant Vice President

Anne H. J. Dize

Assistant Vice President

Claire I. Hoff

Assistant Vice President

Martha H. James

Assistant Vice President

Dawn M. Steelman

Assistant Vice President

Jane O. Wyatt

Assistant Vice President

SHORE INVESTMENTS, INC.

Henry P. Custis, Jr.

Chairman

Scott C. Harvard

President & CEO

Steven M. Belote

Vice President/Secretary/CFO

Ann Y. Justis

Vice President

Donna E. Weaver

Vice President

Vonda M. Smith

Assistant Secretary

SALISBURY BOARD OF DIRECTORS

John Charles Seipp,

Chairman Attorney & Counselor at Law

Edward E. Henry

Retired

William E. Martin

ERA Martin & Associates

Craig H. McConnell

President, Maryland Division

Brent C. Miller

Sperry Van Ness—Miller

Commercial Real Estate

Billye Lee Sarbanes

Retired

Donald E. Williams

Advanced Property Rental.com

Dr. Donald Wood

Peninsula Cardiology Associates, P.A.

Corporate Information

CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS

25020 Shore Parkway

Onley, Virginia 23418

(757) 787-1335

Fax (757) 787-3275

MAIN OFFICE

25253 Lankford Highway

Onley, VA 23418

(757) 787-1335

BRANCH OFFICES

18426 Dunne Avenue

Parksley, Virginia 23421

(757) 665-4188

6350 Maddox Boulevard

Chincoteague, Virginia 23336

(757) 336-3144

21220 North Bayside Drive

Cheriton, Virginia 23316

(757) 331-3800

4017 Lankford Highway

Exmore, Virginia 23350

(757) 442-3911

1516 South Salisbury Boulevard

Salisbury, Maryland 21801

(410) 543-2600

100 West Main Street

Salisbury, Maryland 21801

(410) 548-7125

SHORE INVESTMENTS, INC.

OFFICES

Accawmacke Office Park

23349 Counsel Drive

Accomac, VA 23301

(888) 576-4279

100 West Main Street

Salisbury, Maryland 21801

(410) 548-4133

TRANSFER AGENT

Fulton Financial Services

One Penn Square

Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17604

SPECIAL COUNSEL

LeClair Ryan

707 East Main Street, 11^th Floor

Richmond, Virginia 23219

INVESTOR INFORMATION

Lynn M. Badger

Shore Financial Corporation

P. O. Box 920

Onley, Virginia 23418

(757) 787-1335

investorinfo@shorebank.com

MEMBER

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Federal Reserve System

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

Goodman & Company, LLP

One Commercial Place, Suite 800

Norfolk, Virginia 23514

INTERNET

Web site: www.shorebank.com

Address: shorebank.com

ANNUAL MEETING

The annual meeting of the stockholders of Shore Financial Corporation will be held at its headquarters in Onley, Virginia on Tuesday, April 17, 2007 at 2:00 p.m.

SECURITIES LISTING

The Company’s shares are traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under ticker symbol “SHBK”.

MARKET PARTICIPANTS

Anderson & Strudwick, Inc.

Automated Trading Desk Financial Services, LLC

Boenning & Scattergood, Inc.

Citadel Derivatives Group, LLC

Citigroup Global Market Holdings Inc.

Davenport & Company, LLC

E*Trade Capital markets, LLC

Ferris, Baker Watts, Incorporated

Hill, Thompson, Magid & Co., Inc.

Knight Equity Markets, L.P.

Koonce Securities, Inc.

McKinnon & Company, Inc.

RBC Capital Markets Corporation

Sandler O’Neill & Partners, L.P.

Scott & Stringfellow, Inc.

Sterne, Agee & Leach, Inc.

Susquehanna Capital Group

Thompson Davis & Company, Inc.

UBS Securities, L.L.C.

CORPORATE INFORMATION

CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS

25020 Shore Parkway • Onley, Virginia 23418

(757) 787-1335 or (800) 852-8176

BRANCH LOCATIONS

VIRGINIA

Onley Branch	Exmore Branch	Parksley Branch
25253 Lankford Hwy.	4071 Lankford Hwy.	18426 Dunne Ave.
Onley, Virginia 23418	Exmore, Virginia 23350	Parksley, Virginia 23421
(757) 787-1335 or	(757) 442-3911	(757) 665-4188
(800) 852-8176

Chincoteague Branch	Cheriton Branch
6350 Maddox Blvd.	21220 N. Bayside Dr.
Chincoteague, Virginia 23336	Cheriton, Virginia 23316
(757) 336-3144	(757) 331-3800

MARYLAND
Salisbury Route 13 Branch	Salisbury Downtown Plaza Branch
1503 S Salisbury Blvd.	100 West Main Street
Salisbury, Maryland 21801	Salisbury, Maryland 21801
(410) 543-2600	(410) 548-7125

SHORE INVESTMENTS, INC.

OFFICES

Accawmacke Office Park	100 West Main Street
23349 Counsel Drive	Salisbury, Maryland 21801
Accomac, VA 23301	(410) 548-7125
(757) 787-4279

Photos by Curtis J. Badger

Photo Courtesy of Bay Creek Resort & Club

Photo by Kathy Pusey, Salisbury University

www.shorebank.com

SHORE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

25020 Shore Parkway

P.O. Box 920

Onley, Virginia 23418

(757) 787-1335

(800) 852-8176

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Scott C. Harvard, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Shore Financial Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 20, 2007	/s/    SCOTT C. HARVARD
	Scott C. Harvard President and Chief Executive Officer

80

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Steven M. Belote, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Shore Financial Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 20, 2007	/s/    STEVEN M. BELOTE
	Steven M. Belote Chief Financial Officer and Vice President

81

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Shore Financial Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott C. Harvard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/    SCOTT C. HARVARD        

Scott C. Harvard

President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 20, 2007

This certificate accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and will not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

82

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Shore Financial Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven M. Belote, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/    STEVEN M. BELOTE        

Steven M. Belote

Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 20, 2007

This certificate accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and will not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

83